Court Opinion

ID: 2922994
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:25:38.871289+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:32.137039
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-466-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE: MONICA MICHELENA AND FELA B. OLIVAREZ 

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relators, Monica Michelena and Fela B. Olivarez, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in the above cause on August 23, 2006.  Real party in interest, Robert
Michelena, filed a response on September 20, 2006.  The Court, having examined and
fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with exhibits and the response with
appendix, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the
relief sought.  Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 52.8(a).
									PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 22nd day of September, 2006.

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).