Court Opinion

ID: 9556911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-19 06:10:04.230442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:26.297689
License: Public Domain

11TH COURT OF APPEALS
                                EASTLAND, TEXAS
                                    JUDGMENT

Micky Don Valverde,                          * From the 132nd District Court
                                               of Borden County,
                                               Trial Court No. 248.

Vs. No. 11-22-00352-CR                       * August 17, 2023

The State of Texas,                          * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.
                                               (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
                                               Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

     This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is
error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,
we modify the judgment of the trial court and the district clerk’s bill of costs to
delete (1) the assertion that restitution is payable to the Borden County Community
Supervision and Corrections Department and (2) the court-appointed attorney’s fees
of $600 that were ordered and assessed against Micky Don Valverde for legal
representation associated with the revocation proceeding. We further modify the
judgment and bill of costs to properly characterize the remaining “restitution”
designated by the trial court in its revocation judgment as the outstanding $660 in
reimbursement fees and $290 in court costs that the trial court assessed during
Micky Don Valverde’s original guilty plea proceeding.
     We modify the trial court’s judgment (1) to include the first allegation raised
in the State’s amended motions to revoke which states that “on or about January 9,
2022, in Callahan County, Texas, [Micky Don Valverde] did then and there
intentionally   or   knowingly    possess   a   controlled     substance,   namely,
methamphetamine, in the amount of one gram or more but less than four grams”
and (2) to recite the correct date—February 17, 2022—that Micky Don Valverde
committed the violation that is referred to in the sixth allegation of the State’s
amended motion to revoke.
     As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.