Court Opinion

ID: 998988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:19:19.639838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:10.327570
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-6444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TRACY WILLIAM COLEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-95-65-MU, CA-98-310-3-MU)

Submitted:   June 17, 1999                 Decided:   June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy William Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tracy William Coley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Coley, Nos. CR-95-65-MU;

CA-98-310-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1999).   We decline to consider on

appeal the issue Coley raises in his informal brief, because it was

not first raised in the district court.      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2