Court Opinion

ID: 1013296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:58:51.424624+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:12.642920
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 04-6564

PERRY L. CRAWFORD,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES M. TURPIN; SUSAN MCNEELY; MARY STEINS,

                                           Defendants - Appellees,

          and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE
UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD,

                                                           Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-40-1)

Submitted: May 13, 2004                         Decided:   May 20, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh,
North Carolina; Roy Asberry Cooper III, Marry S. Mercer, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

                             - 2 -
PER CURIAM:

           Perry L. Crawford appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.           We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we

affirm   for   the   reasons   stated   by   the   district   court.   See

Crawford v. Turpin, No. CA-01-40-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2004).            We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                  - 3 -