Court Opinion

ID: 5025997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 04:49:34.969729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:57.208568
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
In her motion for rehearing, appellee seeks to distinguish the Hulme case from her cases on the basis that the issues of waiver *322and estoppel were not involved in the Hulme case. While the opinion of the Supreme Court, 134 Tex. 539, 136 S.W.2d 602, does not disclose these issues, it will be seen -from the report of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 116 S.W.2d 459, that these issues were involved practically as in the instant case.
The motion is overruled.