Court Opinion

ID: 4226191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-12-06 15:00:38.639874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:38.073056
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10706   Date Filed: 12/06/2017   Page: 1 of 2

                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 17-10706
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00366-SDM-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

OCTAVIUS HENDERSON,
a.k.a. Octavious Henderson,
                                                            Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                               (December 6, 2017)

Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      William Sansone, appointed counsel for Octavius Henderson in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 17-10706    Date Filed: 12/06/2017   Page: 2 of 2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Henderson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2