Court Opinion

ID: 1001693
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:59:17.376803+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:24.504072
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7661

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM MARCEL BOYCE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-114, CA-97-357)

Submitted:   April 20, 2000                 Decided:   May 23, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Marcel Boyce, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

       William Marcel Boyce seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.      See United States v. Boyce, Nos. CR-91-114;

CA-97-357 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 1999).         We dispense with oral argu-

ment   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are   adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                      2