Court Opinion

ID: 282377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:44:23+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:57:14.460647
License: Public Domain

403 F.2d 717
160 U.S.P.Q. 453
ALLEN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and ColonialRubber Works, Inc., an Indiana Corporationv.NATIONAL SPONGE CUSHION CO., Inc., a California corporation,Appellant.
No. 17164.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 10, 1968.Decided Nov. 27, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 31, 1968,Certiorari Denied March 24, 1969, See 89 S.Ct.1194.

Louis M. Welsh, San Diego, Cal., Pendleton, Neuman, Seibold & Williams, Chicago, Ill.  (Sidney Neuman, Chicago, Ill., Philip J. Albert, Trenton, N.J., William J. Birmingham, Chicago, Ill., Welsh & Gibson, San Diego, Cal., Levy, Levy, Albert & Marcus, Trenton, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.
Don K. Harness, Detroit, Mich., Backes & Backes, Trenton, N.J.  (Richard E. Dibner, Detroit, Mich., Robert M. Backes, Trenton, N.J., Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting plaintiff's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following a jury trial and verdict for defendant.  Appellant contends that there were conflicts of fact necessary for the jury to resolve; and that there was no showing that reasonable men could not have reached the verdict returned by the jury and thus, in granting the motion, the district court usurped the function of the jury to find the facts.

2
We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.  We will affirm the order of the district court on its thorough and well-reasoned opinion, Allen Industries, Inc. v. National Sponge Cushion, Inc., 292 F. Supp. 504 (D.N.J.1967).