Court Opinion

ID: 2673415
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-05-10 03:14:46.461251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:18:32.567812
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 12-587V
                                       Filed: April 2, 2014
                                       Not for Publication

*************************************
KIMBERLY M. PEREZ,                           *
                                             *
               Petitioner,                   *   Attorneys’ fees and costs decision; amount
                                             *   to which respondent does not object
 v.                                          *
                                             *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                          *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                          *
                                             *
               Respondent.                   *
                                             *
*************************************
Neal J. Fialkow, Pasadena, CA, for petitioner.
Alexis B. Babcock, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

                DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

       On March 25, 2014, petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs, requesting
reimbursement for fees and costs in the amount of $26,445.54.

       On April 2, 2014, the parties informed the undersigned’s law clerk that during informal
discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. Based on
these objections, petitioner amends her request for reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs to
$20,027.79. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
redact such material from public access.
be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $20,027.79, representing reimbursement for
attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to
petitioner and Neal Fialkow, Esq. in the amount of $20,027.79.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 2, 2014                                                               s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                      Laura D. Millman
                                                                                       Special Master

2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2