Court Opinion

ID: 9498264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 17:12:38.764288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:58:43.312982
License: Public Domain

MURPHY, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I write separately only to point out the very significant difference for constitutional purposes between the necessary communications involved in supervision of a defendant on supervised release and the type of inquiry in Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420, 104 S.Ct. 1136, 79 L.Ed.2d 409 (1984), where the probation officer was informed that the defendant had admitted during sex offender treatment to committing a rape and murder, determined that the police should have this information, and subsequently set up a meeting with the defendant during which he admitted to the crimes.