Court Opinion

ID: 5741423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:42:19.359684+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:04.666064
License: Public Domain

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered July 5, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.
The court providently exercised its discretion in denying, *419without a hearing, defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]), since defendant’s unsubstantiated claims were refuted by his plea allocution. Defendant submitted a standard form lacking any case-specific allegations, and his oral submission added nothing of substance (see People v Little, 37 AD3d 214 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 987 [2007]). The record establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.
Defendant did not establish any good cause for a reassignment of counsel, or any facts that warranted further inquiry by the court. The record demonstrates that counsel provided effective assistance (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.