Court Opinion

ID: 7172453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:27:49.6815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:46.787299
License: Public Domain

By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.
PROVOSTY, C. J.
This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,1 this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.
Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

 Ante, p. 1023.