Court Opinion

ID: 2805350
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-06-03 19:13:18.059209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:37.026152
License: Public Domain

People v Sattan (2015 NY Slip Op 04671)

People v Sattan

2015 NY Slip Op 04671

Decided on June 3, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 3, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
PETER B. SKELOS
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
SHERI S. ROMAN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2013-02707
 (Ind. No. 7524/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vJimmy Sattan, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 20, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137-138; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., SKELOS, LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court