Court Opinion

ID: 2906110
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:56:44.479627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:53.972299
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-07-267 CR

____________________

BRITTNEY ANTWINE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 264196

MEMORANDUM OPINION
	On July 31, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained
why she needed time for filing the record.  The appellant did not file a response.  It appears
that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  See Tex. R. App. P.
20.2.  There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
	APPEAL DISMISSED.

						_______________________________
							STEVE McKEITHEN
							         Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered September 12, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.