Court Opinion

ID: 991430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:36:36.709929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:40.768632
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7174

KEITH LAWRENCE WHITE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria.    Claude M. Hilton, District
Judge. (CA-96-836-AM)

Submitted:   January 14, 1997             Decided:   February 6, 1997

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Lawrence White, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White
v. Tucker, No. CA-96-836-AM (E.D. Va. June 17, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2