Court Opinion

ID: 9622981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 06:26:01.397347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:05.096305
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Presiding Judge,
dissents in part, and concurs in part.
I concur that this conviction of Thomas Leon Harris for the offense of Murder should be affirmed. I dissent to his conviction for robbery with firearms, because he sustained this murder conviction prior to being placed on trial on the robbery charge. In the robbery charge I dissented because I believe he was twice placed in jeopardy insofar as the armed robbery charge was the premise for this murder charge.
Likewise, I feel compelled to dissent to this conviction of Floyd Carver Harris, because the State first convicted him for the same armed robbery charge. What I stated in my dissent to Harris v. State, Okl.Cr., 555 P.2d 76 (1976), is applicable to this conviction of Floyd Carver Harris.