Court Opinion

ID: 9692542
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 15:56:58.077201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:28:03.418194
License: Public Domain

White, J.,
dissenting.
The majority, by allowing parol evidence to determine whether the notices sent the guarantors pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-504(3) (Reissue 1980) were reasonable under the circumstances, departs from the bright line approach to notice requirements adopted by this court in First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Hughes, 214 Neb. 42, 332 N.W.2d 674 (1983); Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Hi-Bo Farms, Inc., 224 Neb. 463, 398 N.W.2d 693 (1987); General Electric Credit Corp. v. Lewis, 230 Neb. 429, 432 N.W.2d 27 (1988); and American Honda Finance Corp. v. Bennett, 232 Neb. 21, 439 N.W.2d 459 (1989).
I would adhere to precedent and affirm the granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Kelleys.