Court Opinion

ID: 5983977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 08:29:30.664616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:34.135844
License: Public Domain

—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 30, 1992, which, upon a finding that there was no probable cause, dismissed the complaint.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The Supreme Court should have decided the instant proceeding on the merits and erred in transferring it to this Court (see, Executive Law §298). However, this Court will resolve the matter in the interest of judicial economy.
The determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing the petitioner’s complaint alleging sex discrimination for lack of probable cause was supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole and had a rational basis (see, Executive Law § 297 [2] [a]; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 215; Frederique v Great Neck Pub. School UFSD No. 7, 140 AD2d 667; Masserman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 138 AD2d 464). O’Brien, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.