Court Opinion

ID: 9413425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 23:05:51.424327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:45.959287
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
March 9, 1993
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED.
In our opinion, we observed that “the firm did not advance any funds to the Coutees; therefore, the statutory privilege does not apply.” By necessity we there referred only to funds discussed in the stipulations in the record. Those stipulations involved the loan made to the Coutees by the bank, and the funds paid through the firm by the Coutees to the bank as repayment of that loan. We express no opinion regarding other funds that the firm may have advanced to the Coutees, nor the firm’s status regarding any such advances.