Court Opinion

ID: 3671708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:19:54.99058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:41.598395
License: Public Domain

Criminal prosecution on warrant charging the defendant with unlawfully obtaining $27.81, as money advanced, "under promise to do certain work for Robert Dunn and did then and there fail and refuse to do the work or any part of it with the exception of one day's work."
The case was tried in the Recorder's Court and de novo on defendant's appeal to the Superior Court.
Verdict: "Guilty as charged in the warrant."
Judgment: Thirty days on the roads.
The defendant appeals, assigning errors.
Upon the call of the case here the defendant lodged a motion in arrest of judgment for that it is not alleged the defendant *Page 447 
obtained the advances "with intent to cheat or defraud." G.S., 14-104. The defect is fatal, and it appears on the face of the record. S. v. Foster,ante, 72; S. v. Norman, 110 N.C. 484, 14 S.E. 968. The warrant charges no offense.
The motion is well interposed and must be allowed. S. v. Morgan,226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E.2d 166.
Judgment arrested.