Court Opinion

ID: 1004467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:41:37.851298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:11.372707
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7508

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

STEPHEN PETERSON, a/k/a Anthony L. Lewis,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.   Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CR-96-679, CA-00-1781-3-19)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                   Decided:   May 22, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Stephen Peterson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Peterson, Nos. CR-96-679;

CA-00-1781-3-19 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2000).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2