Court Opinion

ID: 8681969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:37:15.981999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.990367
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lewis Thomas Cornell appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on an amendment to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s *144order. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (a district court has no authority to reconsider its decision on a sentence reduction motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED