Court Opinion

ID: 9905446
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-29 16:04:47.937483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:36.257592
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2022-2472
                 _____________________________

DARRYL EDWARD MCKNIGHT JR.,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

                        November 29, 2023

PER CURIAM.

     Appellant challenges the imposition of costs on appeal. We
affirm the imposition of costs of prosecution without further
comment. See Parks v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1524 (Fla. 1st
DCA Aug. 2, 2023). As to Appellant’s claim that the State failed to
request the FDLE costs that were imposed, the record shows
otherwise. To the extent Appellant argues that there was not
sufficient evidence to support imposition of the FDLE costs, this
issue was not preserved for appeal. See Mapp v. State, 71 So. 3d
776 (Fla. 2011) (holding that a claim that insufficient evidence was
presented to support the order for restitution was not preserved
for appeal by filing 3.800(b) motion).

    AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant
Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

                               2