Court Opinion

ID: 5609375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:54:18.095716+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:03.305026
License: Public Domain

Broyles, P. J.
1. A stipulation in a bill of lading issued by a common carrier, that the carrier can not be held liable for any injuries inflicted upon live stock transported by it, unless suit therefor is brought within six months aftér the right of action accrues, is not unreasonable, and is valid and binding. Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. Co. v. Harriman, 227 U. S. 657, 673 (33 Sup. Ct. 397, 57 L. ed. 690, 698); Maxwell v. Liverpool Ins. Co., 12 Ga. App. 127 (76 S. E. 1036).
2. Such a stipulation as is mentioned above takes the place of the statute of limitations and is governed by the same rules; and where fraud is relied upon to prevent the bar of the statute or the superseding stipulation from attaching, it must be such fraud as involves moral turpitude. Austin v. Raiford, 68 Ga. 201; Maxwell v. Walsh, 117 Ga. 467, *476471 (43 S. E. 704). In the instant case no such fraud was alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, nor were any facts therein shown which disclosed actual fraud of any kind.
Decided March 15, 1917.
Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. July 19, 1916.
Soscos Luke, Eubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff. Tye, Peeples & Tye, Dean & Dean, L. H. Covington, for defendant.
3. Under these rulings the court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s petition on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenhvns and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.