Court Opinion

ID: 9779109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 21:36:28.704695+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:27.786863
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
ODOM, Judge.
The opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part on original submission, by the writer, is withdrawn.
The questions that concerned the writer regarding the constitutionality of Art. 37.-071(b)(2), V.A.C.C.P., have been laid to rest by the Supreme Court of the United States in Jurek v. Texas, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2950, 49 L.Ed.2d 929, 19 Cr.L. 3282. See also Gregg v. Georgia, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859, 19 Cr.L. 3250, and Proffitt v. Florida, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 49 L.Ed.2d 913, 19 Cr.L. 3276.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.