Court Opinion

ID: 1574243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:49:19.629222+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:08.022540
License: Public Domain

224 S.W.3d 641 (2007)
Edward K. SWAIM, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88794.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 29, 2007.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen. Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Edward Swaim appeals the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).