Court Opinion

ID: 4151696
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-10 14:00:58.335874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:03.045906
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-15856   Date Filed: 03/10/2017   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 16-15856
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00020-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

WINSTON D. FOSTER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (March 10, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 16-15856    Date Filed: 03/10/2017   Page: 2 of 2

      Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Winston D. Foster in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Foster’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2