Court Opinion

ID: 1003618
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:29:04.739404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:23.301075
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-7519

ROGER KYLE DAVIS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-603-7)

Submitted:   February 8, 2001           Decided:     February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Kyle Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen B. Martin, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Roger Kyle Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   Davis v. Warden, Buckingham Corr.

Ctr., No. CA-99-603-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2000).   Davis’ motion for

appointment of counsel is denied.    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2