Court Opinion

ID: 7740928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:01:55.655638+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:31.242283
License: Public Domain

HOUSTON, Justice
(concurring specially).
I go with the flow.
I concurred in Sisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plastering Co., 775 So.2d 759 (Ala.2000). If, as the dissenting Justices contend, Sisters of the Visitation is precedent for granting these mandamus petitions, then I misunderstood what I was voting on in Sisters of the Visitation and I should have concurred only in the result in that case. In my opinion, neither the words nor the reasoning of the majority opinion in Sisters of the Visitation has any precedential value in a case involving an activity in which the flow of commerce must continue in order to fulfill the purpose of the activity.