Court Opinion

ID: 9406913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-05 06:07:59.089158+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:34.055396
License: Public Domain

Supreme Court of Texas
                              ══════════
                               No. 21-0017
                              ══════════

                 Sarah Gregory and New Prime, Inc.,
                                Petitioners,

                                     v.

                         Jaswinder Chohan, et al.,
                               Respondents

   ═══════════════════════════════════════
              On Petition for Review from the
       Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas
   ═══════════════════════════════════════

                               JUDGMENT

      THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, having heard this cause on
petition for review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, and
having considered the appellate record, briefs, and counsels’ argument,
concludes that the court of appeals’ judgment should be reversed.
      IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s
opinion, that:
                    1)      The court of appeals’ judgment is reversed;
                    2)      The cause is remanded to the trial court for a
                            new trial; and
                   3)    Each party shall bear its own costs incurred
                         in this Court and in the court of appeals.

      Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified to
the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District and to the County Court at
Law of Dallas County, Texas, for observance.

 Justice Blacklock announced the Court’s judgment and delivered an
opinion, in which Chief Justice Hecht and Justice Busby joined in full,
 and in which Justice Bland joined except as to Parts II.C.2 and II.D.
 Justice Devine filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which
                          Justice Boyd joined.
Justice Bland filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the
                               judgment.
    Justice Lehrmann, Justice Huddle, and Justice Young did not
                   participate in the decision.
                            June 16, 2023
                              *********

                                      2