Court Opinion

ID: 7599874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:59:17.096499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:31.728074
License: Public Domain

After a thorough review of the record, the exhibits, and the briefs filed in this case, we are unable to conclude that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendants. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court based on that verdict is affirmed. See Bailey v. Avera, 560 So.2d 1038
(Ala. 1990); Watson v. McGee, 348 So.2d 461 (Ala. 1977); Chicago,Mobile Development Co. v. G. C. Coggin Co., 259 Ala. 152,66 So.2d 151 (1953); Watkins v. Roden Coal Co., 205 Ala. 367,87 So. 565 (1921).
AFFIRMED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.