Court Opinion

ID: 656386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:15.159780
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 818
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James Earl HOLSTON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 93-6562.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 16, 1993.Decided:  October 19, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.  (CA-92-768-BO)
James Earl Holston, Appellant Pro Se.
Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
James Earl Holston appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Holston v. State of North Carolina, No. CA-92-768-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Holston's Motion for Judicial Notice and note that the information contained in the motion would not affect the disposition of his case