Court Opinion

ID: 7137773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:25:50.442802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:41.509225
License: Public Domain

Nunn, J.
I dissent for the reason that there was evidence that the bell was not rung and the train was being run very fast as it approached the child and in a city when it was the duty of appellant to ring the bell or blow the whistle and keep a lookout for persons, and to have the train under control so as to prevent injury to persons. See I. C. R. R. Co. v. Murphy’s Adm’r, 123 Ky. 787, 97 S. W. 729, 30 Ky. Law Rep. 93, 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 352.