Court Opinion

ID: 7375779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-28 23:47:26.845293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:12.367847
License: Public Domain

The Court
decided, 1. That the motion might be sustained in the name of Fendall, altHough he had taken the insolvent oath; 2. That the sergeant could not levy the execution of Deneale v. Fendall on the money in his own hands made on the fi. fa. of Fendall v. Toiuers, and that such return was not good.
Judgment for the amount made on the fi.fa., and fifteen per cent, per annum damages.
Affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 1 Cranch, 117.