Court Opinion

ID: 7618444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 14:20:38.983327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:00.905727
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court denied Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State , 147 So.3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Luckner v. State , 979 So.2d 1121, 1121-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.