Court Opinion

ID: 5165758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 03:32:40.226291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:15.390545
License: Public Domain

[16] I concur in the Court's analysis of the Sixth Amendment issue concerning appointment of counsel for a motion for a new trial in Oklahoma. However, I find merit in Runnel's Proposition II. AJackson v. Denno1 hearing should have been held outside the presence of the jury. Brewer v. State, 414 P.2d 559, 563 (Okla. Cr. 1966).
1 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964).