Court Opinion

ID: 4317582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-02 20:24:56.753328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:35.947829
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
  
  .
 

   AND NOW,
  
  this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
  
   GRANTED.
  
  The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
 

  Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?