Court Opinion

ID: 1003142
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:22:05.680799+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:24.630229
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-98-150, CA-99-705-3)

Submitted:   December 14, 2000         Decided:     December 22, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, John
Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Lightfoot, Nos. CR-98-

150; CA-99-705-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2