Court Opinion

ID: 5571816
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:14:03.476062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:46.910033
License: Public Domain

Tittle, J.
1. Under the Penal Code, § 920, a person charged with crime may, under certain circumstances, be sent or committed to the jail of a county other than that in which the crime was committed, for safe-keeping. When this has been done, the person so committed is in the full care and custody of the county authorities which by statute have charge of the jail in which such person is confined, so long as he remains in such jail.
■2. An obligation is imposed by law on the county where the crime was committed, and from which such person was sent, to pay to the county in the jail of which he was confined all necessary jail fees, costs, etc., incurred in behalf of the prisoner, among which is necessary medical attention rendered to such prisoner; and if payment thereof is refused or is not made, the county incurring such expense has a right of action against the county from which such prisoner was sent, to recover the same.
.3. The law, however, creates no liability against the county from which the accused person was sent, in favor of an individual who gave medical attention to such prisoner, on the request of, and under a contract to do so, made with the keeper of the jail.
4. A county is not liable to be sued unless liability is fixed or the suit is authorized by statute.
.6. The trial judge erred in overrulingthe motion for nonsuit, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.