Court Opinion

ID: 9383437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-30 16:08:09.164301+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:45.511516
License: Public Domain

Matter of Sehmi (2023 NY Slip Op 01729)

Matter of Sehmi

2023 NY Slip Op 01729

Decided on March 30, 2023

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered:March 30, 2023

PM-75-23
[*1]In the Matter of Anushka Sehmi, a Suspended Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Anushka Sehmi, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5470083.)

Calendar Date:January 3, 2023

Before:

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
Whittingham Law, New York City (Kaylin L. Whittingham of counsel), for respondent.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1441 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to November 19, 2022 and the December 27, 2022 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Jie Zhang], 176 AD3d 1300, 1300 [3d Dept 2019]) it is,
ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.
Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.