Court Opinion

ID: 3666165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:16:09.438026+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:07.450066
License: Public Domain

Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury, tried at the March Term, 1932, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant, affirmed on appeal, 203 N.C. 555. *Page 572 
Thereafter, at the next succeeding term of the Superior Court of Union County, following affirmance of judgment on appeal, the plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Motion allowed and defendant appeals, for that, the showing made by plaintiff on the hearing of said motion was not sufficient to warrant favorable action on the part of the court.
No appeal lies to this Court from the discretionary determination of an application for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. S. v.Lea, 203 N.C. 316. But where the applicant fails to make out a showing of "newly discovered evidence," as this phrase is defined in the law (S. v.Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81), no occasion arises for the exercise of the court's discretion. Stilley v. Planing Mills, 161 N.C. 517,77 S.E. 760. We agree with the defendant that plaintiff's showing on his application for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was insufficient to invoke a discretionary ruling in his behalf. Stilley v.Planing Mills, supra.
Error.