Court Opinion

ID: 5876927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:04:05.513148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:53.155568
License: Public Domain

We agree with the trial court’s determination, after a Huntley hearing, that defendant’s oral admissions of guilt and a written statement made to the police were admissible in evidence. There *651is no evidence in the record to indicate that the statements were obtained by the police in violation of defendant’s rights (People v Huffman, 41 NY2d 29, 34; People v Burnett, 99 AD2d 786, 787; People v Winchell, 98 AD2d 838).
Also, the sentencing court exercised sound discretion in imposing upon defendant an indeterminate term of from 8Vs to 25 years’ imprisonment. Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb its determination (People v Colon, 91 AD2d 641; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.