Court Opinion

ID: 8030526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:07:45.808332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:57.674213
License: Public Domain

On April 28, 2010, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the *63offense of Aggravated Burglary, a felony; and Count III: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Assault with a Weapon, a felony. Count III shall run concurrent with Count I, and this sentence shall run concurrent with any other sentence the Defendant is currently serving.
On August 5, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.
DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.
Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.