Court Opinion

ID: 7930078
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:03:22.127854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:19.254987
License: Public Domain

Marston, C. J.
Certiorari to review the proceedings of a drain commissioner. May 3d, 1878, an application was made to the drain commissioner to establish and open a water course through certain lands. The 7th day of May, 1878, at a certain hour and place, was fixed for examination of the application, and the commissioner returns he “ gave the notice *559required by the statutes to the parties interested in said water course.” This we have repeatedly held was insufficient, and rendered all subsequent proceedings void as against parties not waiving notice or otherwise estopped.
It farther appears from the return that no survey or plat of the proposed ditch was made until April 22d, 1879, nearly a year after the initiation of the proceedings, and no cause or excuse for the delay is given. November 13th, 1879, the parties through whose lands the ditch was to run executed a release for all claim of damages. It may be very questionable whether such a delay would not of itself render void for want of jurisdiction all the proceedings thereafter, but it is hardly necessary to pass upon this question at present.
The writ in this case was sued out August 12th, 1880, and although .the work seems to have been done, taxes collected therefor and paid upon contract some months previous thereto, yet we are of opinion the plaintiff should not be deprived of his remedy in this way. Plaintiff’s real, cause of complaint is that the opening of this ditch has lowered a lake upon the waters of which his lands fronted, changing what was a thing of beauty and afforded a safe and easy place for watering stock and other conveniences into an unsightly and sickening mud-hole, unsafe and dangerous, and that during the progress of the work he was assured the opening of the ditch would have no such effect. Under such circumstances he did not lose his rights by the delay.
The proceedings must be quashed and held for naught.
The other Justices concurred.