Court Opinion

ID: 9551216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:49:24.719252+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:20.256826
License: Public Domain

ROONEY, Justice,
concurring.
I concur with that said in the majority opinion. I agree that marks or charges on a holographic will other than in the testator’s handwriting invalidates it only if made with the knowledge or consent of the testator. Whether or not' the knowledge and consent existed is a question of fact. In this case, the fact finder found such to have existed, and there was evidence to support the findings. They were not clearly erroneous or contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Herman v. Speed King Manufacturing Company, Wyo., 675 P.2d 1271 (1984); Scherling v. Kilgore, Wyo., 599 P.2d 1352 (1979).