Court Opinion

ID: 9581309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:13:34.152208+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:50.579471
License: Public Domain

Boslaugh, J.,
concurring in the result.
I concur in the judgment of the court in this case.
The review provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 19-1808 (Reissue 1977) is very limited. The statute provides that the appeal “shall be confined to the determination of whether or not the judgment or order of . . . the commission, was made in good faith for cause. No appeal to such court shall be taken except upon such ground or grounds(Emphasis supplied.)
The only issue raised by the appellant in this case related to the “constitutional sufficiency” of the notice served upon him. Such an issue cannot be determined in the limited appeal provided by § 19-1808, but may be determined in another proceeding in which the limitations prescribed in § 19-1808 are not applicable.
Although I do not disagree with the conclusions reached in the majority opinion, the sole issue raised by the appellant cannot be determined in an appeal under § 19-1808. If the majority opinion is correct, the limitations imposed by the Legislature in that section have become meaningless.
Hastings and Caporale, JJ., join in this concurrence.