Court Opinion

ID: 2642092
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-11-14 01:02:59.078679+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:56:34.938373
License: Public Domain

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 680

                ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
                                      DIVISION IV
                                      No. CV-13-77

                                                 Opinion Delivered   November 13, 2013

CHERLE MARIE DUNCAN and                          APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND
LLOYD LEO DUNCAN                                 COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
                             APPELLANTS          [NO. CV-06-1443-2]

V.                                               HONORABLE VICKI SHAW COOK,
                                                 JUDGE
DR. ROBERT OLIVE
                              APPELLEE
                                                 REMANDED FOR
                                                 SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE
                                                 RECORD; SUPPLEMENTATION OF
                                                 THE ADDENDUM ORDERED

                           WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

       Appellants appeal the circuit court’s grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

On appeal, appellants argue that (1) appellants’ requests for admissions should not have been

deemed admitted, and (2) summary judgment was improper because even if the requests for

admission were properly deemed admitted, the court should have allowed the admissions to

be withdrawn. We are unable to reach the merits of these arguments. Because appellants failed

to include a pertinent order in the record in violation of Arkansas Rule of Appellate

Procedure–Civil 6(e) and have submitted a brief without a proper addendum in violation of
                                 Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 680

Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i), 1 we order appellants to submit a supplemental record and

supplemental addendum.

       On November 29, 2006, appellants filed a medical-malpractice complaint against

appellee, Orthopedic Associates of Hot Springs, Darlene Abernathy, and two Jane Does. The

named defendants timely filed their joint answer on December 14, 2006, contending that the

complaint was without merit.

       Appellants filed a motion to nonsuit their claims against Orthopedic Associates of Hot

Springs and Darlene Abernathy, without prejudice, on August 29, 2012. Appellee stated the

same in his motion for summary judgment, filed August 31, 2012. A formal order granting

the summary judgment was entered on October 19, 2012.2 Though appellants’ draft order of

dismissal for the aforementioned parties was included in the record, appellants failed to include

the circuit court’s signed order granting their motion to nonsuit in the record.3

       Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e) states that if anything material to

either party is omitted from the record, the appellate court, on its own initiative, may direct

that the omission shall be corrected and that a supplemental record be certified and

       1
        (2012).
       2
        Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b)(5) states that “[a]ny claim against a named but
unserved defendant, including a “John Doe” defendant, is dismissed by the circuit court’s final
judgment or decree.” Because Jane Doe 1 and 2 remained unknown at the time of entry of
the court’s order granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment, Jane Doe 1 and 2 were
effectively dismissed by the court’s order. The circuit court had previously issued a letter
opinion detailing the same contents of the order, on October 9, 2012.
       3
       Neither the motion, nor the draft, was included as separate documents, but they were
included in the record as exhibit attachments to appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

                                               2
                                    Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 680

transmitted.4 The circuit court’s order granting appellants’ motion to nonsuit and dismissing

Orthopedic Associates of Hot Springs and Darlene Abernathy as parties is material to this

court’s ability to verify its jurisdiction as it is essential to determining the finality of the circuit

court’s October 19, 2012 order. Therefore, we remand for supplementation of the record,

correcting the above-referenced deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this order.

        Because the circuit court’s order of dismissal was not included in the record, it also was

not included in the addendum. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4–2(a)(8) requires appellants

to submit an addendum containing “any order adjudicating any claim against any party with

or without prejudice.”5 Accordingly, we order appellants to submit a supplemental addendum

correcting the above-referenced deficiencies within fifteen days from the date on which the

supplemental record is filed. We encourage appellants to review Rule 4–2 of the Rules of the

Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals to ensure that the supplemental addendum

complies with the rules and that no additional deficiencies are present. After service of the

supplemental record and addendum, appellee shall have an opportunity to revise or

supplement his brief in the time prescribed by the clerk, or to rely on the brief that he

previously filed in this appeal.

        Remanded for supplementation of the record; supplementation of the addendum

ordered.

        WALMSLEY and HIXSON, JJ., agree.
        Michael R. Lipscomb, for appellants.
        Malcom Law Firm, by: J. Phillip Malcom and Glenn Ritter, for appellee.

        4
        (2012).
        5
        (2012).

                                                   3