Court Opinion

ID: 9834585
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-02 01:03:19.190382+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:34.570818
License: Public Domain

Upon petition for rehearing:
In its final order the circuit court held “that said paving was not a benefit to said property; and the court is further *332of opinion, that upon the several questions of law presented herein, the plaintiff has failed to show that the assessment was legally and lawfully laid, or that paving certificates were legally and lawfully issued against the property of the defendant, *' * * and has failed to show that a lien was legally and lawfully perfected against the property of said defendant, and has failed to show that said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $14,480.96, together with interest thereon * *
Being of opinion that the matters hereinabove discussed are determinative of the case on this review, it has not been necessary that we consider the matter of benefits. Independently of that matter, for reasons above set forth, we affirm the trial chancellor’s decree dismissing the plaintiff’s bill.