Court Opinion

ID: 4362481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-28 20:01:08.290571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:36.468444
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-6990

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)

Submitted: January 22, 2019                                       Decided: January 28, 2019

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment

motion entitled “Motion to Question the Constitutionality of the Interstate Commerce Act

of 1887.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.       United States v, Dury, No.

1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2018).          We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED

                                            2