Court Opinion

ID: 2937899
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 18:57:54.134885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:11.366761
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-52,280-02

EX PARTE JERMAINE HERRON

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN CAUSE NO. 97-8-3675 FROM THE

24TH DISTRICT COURT OF REFUGIO COUNTY

Per Curiam. Price and Holcomb, JJ., dissent with note.*  Womack and Johnson, JJ.,
dissent.

ORDER

	This is a subsequent application for habeas corpus in which applicant advances an
Eighth Amendment claim,  asserting that  he might suffer pain during the administration of
the chemicals during lethal injection.
	Applicant was convicted of capital murder on April 22, 1999.  We affirmed the
conviction and sentence.  Herron v. State, 86 S.W.3d 621 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002).  After
reviewing applicant's timely filed writ of habeas corpus, we denied relief.  Ex parte Herron,
No. WR-52,280-01 (Tex.Crim.App. November 13, 2002).

 Herron   -2-
	We have reviewed this subsequent application and find that it should be dismissed, 
and the motion for stay of execution is denied.
	IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MAY, 2006
*Price and Holcomb, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in Judge Price's dissenting statement
in Ex parte Derrick Sean O'Brien, Writ No. 51,264-03.

Do Not Publish