Court Opinion

ID: 7590835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:44:37.392802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:39.518333
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Defendant Noble appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief as to all claims contained in the motion except the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel based upon trial counsel’s failure to file a motion for new trial. As to this claim, we remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record show*64ing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.