Court Opinion

ID: 1006671
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:30.575215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:47.822618
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7763

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

KENNETH EUGENE BARRON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-94-306-WMN, CA-01-2840-WMN)

Submitted:   January 31, 2002          Decided:     February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Eugene Barron, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Kenneth Eugene Barron seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Barron, Nos. CR-94-306-

WMN; CA-01-2840-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2