Court Opinion

ID: 7388721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:50:41.064379+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:37.203815
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that, without considering or approving any other ground, the plaintiff’s right to a decree was barred by the statute of limitations, which began to run against the alleged fraud from the defendant’s purchase ; (see Thrower vs. Cureton, 4 Strob. Eq. 155, and McDonald vs. May, 1 Rich. Eq., 91), and that the bill was rightly dismissed.
JohnstoN, Dunkin, Dargan and Wardi,aw, CC., concurring.

Appeal dismissed.