Court Opinion

ID: 8330798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 20:57:50.800594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:27.047002
License: Public Domain

McAdam, C. J.
The defendants are not united in interest, interposed separate answers by different attorneys, and there is no evidence that the several appearances were in bad faith, and for the purpose of incurring costs. The defendants were, therefore, entitled to separate bills of costs (Lane v. Van Orden, 11 Abb. N. C., 228; Royce v. Jones, 23 Hun, 452; Delaware L. and W. R. R. Co. v. Burkhard, 2 N. Y. State R., 184, Code, § 3229), and the order limiting them to one bill must be reversed, with costs.
Nehrbas and Hyatt, JJ., concur.