Court Opinion

ID: 6638982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:43:49.840913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:59:10.315058
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING.
DeWitt, J.
Our opinion was delivered and the decision made in this case on March 16th, 1896. At that time we were informed that the case of Barnitz v. Beverly had been appealed to the United States supreme court. We, therefore, required the clerk of this court to hold the remittitur. The published report of Barnitz v. Beverly in the United States supreme court has recently reached us, and we granted a rehearing in this case of our own motion.
The United States supreme court in Barnitz v. Beverly reversed the Kansas supreme court, 16 S. C. Rep. page 1042, and also as well overruled, on principle, our decision in this case at bar, rendered on March 16th, last. We, having decided this case on a federal question solely, and our decision being in accord, on principle, with the United States supreme court, at the date of its rendition and our decision of the fed*110eral question being since directly overruled by the supreme court, shall now place ourselves in accord with the latest decision of the superior tribunal upon this subject. Therefore, the judgment of this court, instead of remaining as rendered on March 16th will now be that the judgment of the district court be reversed, and the district court be directed to issue the writ of mandamus as prayed for.

Reversed.

HuNT, J., concurs.
Pemberton, C. J., not sitting.