Court Opinion

ID: 8677445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:59:42.992014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.248463
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to strike documents she filed in her closed case. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Miskell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Miskell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.