Court Opinion

ID: 7364154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-27 23:49:57.206131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:42.820412
License: Public Domain

SIMPSON, J.
The appellant was convicted of the offense of failing to work the streets of the city of Gadsden, or in lieu thereof, of failing to pay the amount fixed by the ordinance of said city. The agreed statement of facts shows that the defendant was- a resident of Alabama City, in this state, for .several years and up to the 23d day of May, 1907; that in accordance with the ordinances of that city he paid his street tax on the 1st day *272of May, 1907, for the year commencing on the first Tuesday in April, 1907; that on June 26, 1907 (having removed to Gadsden), he was notified to appear and work the streets of Gadsden, that he presented his receipt showing that he had paid his street tax in Alabama City.
The question raised by the record is whether one who has paid his street tax in one city in the state of Ala-' bama for a certain year can be compelled to work the streets, or to pay street tax, during the same year in another city. Street tax in the city is a substitute for road duty in the rural districts. The law provides that “no person * * * is liable * * * to work more than ten days in any one year.” — Code 1907, § 5779. This court has said that “the payment of street tax in an incorporated town or city is a substitute for the performance of road duty, and it is not the intention of the law that a man shall be liable for both for the same period.” — Taylor v. State, 147 Ala. 131, 132, 41 South. 776. According to the same rule, a person who has paid his street tax in one city is not liable to the same in another city during the same year.
The judgment of the court is reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered in favor of the appellant.
Reversed and rendered.
Dowdell, C. J., and Mayfield and Sayre, JJ., concur.