Court Opinion

ID: 4400996
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-28 19:00:18.556187+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:02.233667
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-2422

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00543-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: May 23, 2019                                           Decided: May 28, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motions for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. U.S. Dep’t of

Defense, No. 1:18-cv-00543-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2