Court Opinion

ID: 1201171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 04:57:51.754027+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:06.280463
License: Public Domain

686 S.E.2d 903 (2009)
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Robert Paul RAINEY.
No. 371P09.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 5, 2009.
James N. Freeman, Elkin, for Robert Rainey.
Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 680 S.E.2d 760.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant-Appellant on the 7th of September 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of September 2009 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."