Court Opinion

ID: 8070902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:26:13.810523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:14.751293
License: Public Domain

BLANCHARD, J.
The plaintiff, a married woman, brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries, and recovered a judgment in the sum of $249, besides costs, amounting to the sum of $269. The pleadings were oral, the complaint asking damages for personal injuries, and the answer was a general denial. On demand a bill of particulars was served by the plaintiff, and in that she set forth the items of damages as follows:
Doctor’s expense.................................................... $ 20
Medicine ........................................................... 5
Clothes Worn by the plaintiff and being torn........................... 15
Pain and suffering.........■......................................... 209
Total.................................................:.......$249
The testimony offered on the part' of the plaintiff established a cause of action. The defendant offered "no testimony whatever. The plaintiff, being a married woman, and living with her husband, was entitled to recover only for the pain and suffering she had endured. Becker v. Albany Railway, 35 App. Div. 46, 54 N. Y. Supp. 395. The evidence of the doctor as to the value of his services was clearly incompetent under the case above cited. See, also, Sweeney v. Union Railway Company, 31 Misc. Rep. 472, 64 N. Y. Supp. 453, decided by this court. There is no evidence as to the amount paid for medicine, nor is there any as to the value of the clothes worn by the plaintiff at the time of the accident, which she claims in her bill of particulars were torn.
The judgment must therefore be reduced to the sum of $209, and, as so reduced, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. All concur.