Court Opinion

ID: 1395890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:57:09.090705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:32.860404
License: Public Domain

117 Ga. App. 744 (1968)
161 S.E.2d 922
C & A LAND COMPANY
v.
WILSON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.
CHATHAM
v.
WILSON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.
43543, 43544.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Submitted April 3, 1968.
Decided May 3, 1968.
Harvey A. Clein, Schwall & Hewett, Emory A. Schwall, for appellants.
Claude E. Hambrick, Swertfeger, Scott & Pike, L. Jack Swertfeger, W. Fred Orr, for appellee.
DEEN, Judge.
Code Ann. § 81A-156 (h) (Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 238), invoked by the appellee in its motion to dismiss the appeal, states in part: "An order denying summary judgment is not subject to review by direct appeal or otherwise, unless within 10 days of the order of denial the trial judge certifies that the order denying summary judgment as to any issue or as to any party should be subject to review, in which case such order shall be subject to review by direct appeal." Such certification was not made in this case. See Davis v. Holt, 224 Ga. 55 (159 SE2d 403). As a matter of fact it should be made use of only sparingly in close cases where real doubt exists as to the merits of the motion. Otherwise, routine certification by trial courts of the appealability of orders denying motions for summary judgment might well annul the legislative *745 intent as to Section (h), the purpose of which was to do away with unnecessary delay and to assist the flow of cases toward a trial on their merits.
Appeal dismissed. Jordan, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.