Court Opinion

ID: 2791657
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-07 13:04:59.868847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:52:28.380263
License: Public Domain

=================================================================
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 102 SSM 8
In the Matter of Anthony J.
Russo,
            Respondent,
        v.
New York City Department of
Education,
            Appellant.

            Submitted by Kathy Chang Park, for appellant.
            Submitted by Anthony J. Russo, respondent, pro se.

*   *   *    *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,
order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, New York
City Department of Education's cross motion to dismiss the
petition granted in its entirety, and certified question answered
in the negative. We cannot say that "the penalty of
[termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience" (Matter of
Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board
of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale &
Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-
Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided April 7, 2015