Court Opinion

ID: 156914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 04:49:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:53:46.503670
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Tenth Circuit
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                           SEP 22 1998
                             FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      PATRICK FISHER
                                                                               Clerk

    HENRY LEE McCONE,

                Petitioner-Appellant,

    v.                                                   No. 97-8104
                                                      (D.C. No. 97-CV-9)
    WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL;                             (D. Wyo.)
    WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, in her
    official capacity, a/k/a Judy Uphoff,

                Respondents-Appellees.

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT          *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

         After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

*
      This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

       Petitioner Henry McCone was convicted of four counts of making

terroristic threats in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-505. The Wyoming

Supreme Court affirmed the convictions on direct appeal.       See McCone v. State ,

866 P.2d 740 (Wyo. 1993). Petitioner then filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus challenging his convictions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 that was

dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.      See McCone v. Uphoff ,

No. 95-8017, 1996 WL 194850 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 1996) (unpublished).

On January 14, 1997, petitioner filed the habeas petition that is the subject of this

appeal. Without ordering a response from the state, the district court determined

that petitioner had not shown he was entitled to relief, and it denied the petition.

Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. The district court denied his requests to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and for a certificate of appealability.

Petitioner has renewed these requests in this court.

       To be entitled to a certificate of appealability, petitioner must make

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). Petitioner seeks a certificate of appealability on the same eleven

issues he raised in his petition in the district court, which are the same eleven

issues that he raised in his unsuccessful direct appeal.    See McCone , 866 P.2d

                                             -2-
at 743-44.   1
                 Indeed, the briefs he filed in the district court and on appeal appear

to be his direct appeal brief prepared by counsel with a new signature page

indicating that petitioner submitted the briefs pro se.

      We have fully considered petitioner’s arguments and reviewed the record,

and we find his claims of error unpersuasive for substantially the same reasons

as the district court stated in its order denying the petition. We conclude that he

1
      The eleven issues on which McCone seeks review are as follows:

      I Whether Wyoming Statute § 6-2-205 [sic] is unconstitutional
      because it is vague and overbroad. [The correct statute is § 6-2-505.]
       . . . II Whether the Second Judicial District Court had jurisdiction
      and was proper venue . . . . III Whether Appellant was denied due
      process when witnesses identified his voice from unnecessarily
      suggestive procedures . . . . IV Whether Appellant was denied
      a fair trial when the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury on the
      law of the case . . . . V Whether the district court denied Appellant
      the right to a fair trial when it refused to instruct the jury on the
      lesser-included offense of threatening telephone calls . . . . VI
      Whether witness testimony concerning the credibility and
      truthfulness of the appellant was error per se . . . . VII Whether the
      prosecution violated Wyoming Rules of Evidence 401 and 403 by
      eliciting improper victim impact testimony at trial . . . . VIII
      Whether the trial court erred when it allowed evidence of Appellant’s
      other bad acts under Wyoming Rules of Evidence 404(b) . . . . IX
      Whether the trial court erred when it ruled that Officer Marti’s report
      was inadmissible under W.R.E. 803(6), the business records
      exception to the hearsay rule . . . . X Whether Appellant was
      denied his right to a fair trial when the prosecutor made improper
      remarks in closing arguments . . . . XI Whether the evidence
      produced at trial was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
      that Appellant committed terroristic threats.

McCone , 866 P.2d at 743-44.

                                             -3-
has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and that

he is therefore not entitled to a certificate of appealability.

      Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and

the appeal is DISMISSED. Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis

is DENIED. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.

                                                       Entered for the Court

                                                       John C. Porfilio
                                                       Circuit Judge

                                           -4-