Court Opinion

ID: 3646216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:02:20.298595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:06.225456
License: Public Domain

Civil action for damages arising ex contractu and ex delicto.
Demurrer interposed on the grounds (1) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and (2) for misjoinder of parties and causes.
From a judgment overruling the demurrer, the defendants appeal. *Page 831 
This is the same case that was here at the Spring Term, 1932, on a question of venue, reported in 203 N.C. 12.
The second ground of the demurrer seems to have been abandoned, and it was properly overruled on the first. The complaint contains allegations of damages arising ex delicto, which may have been overlooked, as they are not debated on brief; and a demurrer will be overruled unless the complaint is wholly insufficient. Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N.C. 212, 56 S.E. 874.
The question of the measure of plaintiff's allowable recovery is not presently presented. Pemberton v. Greensboro, 203 N.C. 514,166 S.E. 396.
Affirmed.