Court Opinion

ID: 5558244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:45:19.749248+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:23.558638
License: Public Domain

Bleckley, Judge.
The law of the case is presented with sufficient fullness in the notes read from the bencii. The plaintiff in error cited Story on Prom. Notes, section 63; 1 Parsons on Notes and Bills, 161; 39 Georgia Reports, 130 ; McFarlin vs. Stinson, 56 Ibid., 396; Acts of 1869, p. 133; 51 Georgia Reports, 107; 50 Ibid., 382 ; Galloway vs. West, July Term, 1876 ; 49 Ibid., 431; 50 Ibid., 382; Code, section 2915; 16 Georgia Reports, 382 : 29 Ibid., 700 ; Code, section 5 ; 12 Georgia Reports, 459; 44 Ibid., 128; Code, section 2724. The defendant in error cited 1 Ves. Sen’r., 126 ; 3 Bur. 1890; 2 Williams on Executors, 1512, 1514; 1 Saunders, 210: 9 Wend., 273.
Judgment reversed.