Court Opinion

ID: 6143091
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:45:00.094497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:44.150983
License: Public Domain

Confín, S.
The facts that only three children were in existence at the making of the will, and that three were born subsequently, are conceded. It is, therefore, claimed by the special guardian that, under the provisions of 2 Revised Statutes, 65, *118sec. 49', as am'ended by the Laws of 1869, chap. 22, that the father died intestate as to these after-born children. It is well settled that a testamentary disposition to a class include® every person answering the description at the testator’s death. That is construed by the courts to be the testator’s intention, and they are thus deemed to be mentioned. So', wheré a class is referred - to, whether there is anything devised or bequeathed to them or not, all answering the description must be deemed to be mentioned. It is not considered necessary, however, to elaborate this point, as it will presently appear that this court has no jurisdiction to determine it in this case.
Section 2624 of the Code authorizes the surrogate, where a party expressly puts in issue the validity, construction or effect of any disposition of personal property contained in a will, to determine the question. He is not here required, to determine an issue as to any clause of the will disposing of personal property solely, which he might do, but of one embracing both real and personal, and so. inseparably connected and blended as to prevent a construction as to one species of property without involving the other. As the power to construe a will on the probate is one lately conferred upon the surrogate by statute, and is so far an enlargement of his jurisdiction, he cannot be permitted to go beyond it and attempt to exercise a larger power than was intended to be conferred by the legislature. Matter of Shrader, 63 Hun, 36.
The request to construe is, therefore, refused.
Ordered accordingly.