Court Opinion

ID: 8606756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 03:54:57.067648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:16.838980
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). The Immigration Judge correctly found that petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal because she does not have a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1094 (9th Cir.2002)
Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.
All pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.