Court Opinion

ID: 994035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:17:01.218009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:37.210553
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7671

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

GEORGE WILLIAM MICHAEL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-91-68-JFM)

Submitted:   January 15, 1998             Decided:   January 30, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George William Michael, Appellant Pro Se. William Warren Hamel,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Michael, No. CR-91-68-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 17, 1997). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2