Court Opinion

ID: 3122219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:20:47.813293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:42:18.761886
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued August 9, 2012

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                    For The

                          First District of Texas
                           ————————————
                              NO. 01-12-00283-CV
                           ———————————
                    ROBERT THOMAS ZACH, Appellant
                                       V.
                    KELLY MARULLO ZACH, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 247th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 2006-10971

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Robert Thomas Zach, has neither paid the required filing fee for

this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs

must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required
by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), §

51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app.

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on April 9, 2012.

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the

filing fee, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing

enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant

was again notified on June 8, 2012, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for

failure to pay the filing fee. After being notified a second time that this appeal was

subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee, appellant did not adequately

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

      We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

                                           2