Court Opinion

ID: 1004975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:49:33.777018+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:17.760715
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6032

STEVEN FORSLUND,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DAVID ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional
Center,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-1388-AM)

Submitted:   July 26, 2001                 Decided:   August 2, 2001

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Forslund, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Steven Forslund seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court.       Forslund v. Robinson, No. CA-99-

1388-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 29, 2000).        We deny Forslund’s motion for

preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                             DISMISSED

                                   2