Court Opinion

ID: 569582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:48.266846
License: Public Domain

946 F.2d 887
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Amador Alexis BRAND-MAIGUEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-6580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 1, 1991.Decided Oct. 3, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.   W. Earl Britt, District Judge.  (CR-88-35;  CA-91-38-3-7-CIV)
Amador Alexis Brand-Maiguel, appellant pro se.
Rocco Joseph deGrasse, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C., 900 F.2d 256
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Amador Alexis Brand-Maiguel appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Brand-Maiguel, CR-88-35;  CA-91-38-3-7-CIV (E.D.N.C. May 7, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.