Court Opinion

ID: 9832352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:50:43.823176+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:45.562419
License: Public Domain

.On Motions for Rehearing.
In our original opinion in this case the judgment of the trial court was reformed so as to .allow the appellant, Thelma Cooper Jackson, to recover an undivided interest' in .the surface estate of the land involved, but through inadvertence the interest was set out as an undivided 1/15 interest when the fractional portion recovered should have been a 1/40 interest. Accordingly, the opinion is corrected so as to adjudge to such appellant a recovery of an undivided 1/40 interest in the surface estate of the land described in the judgment. Also, in the motion of the appellee, E. M. Slaughter, our attention is directed to the fact that in the trial court a stipulation between the plaintiffs and E. M. Slaughter was filed in which it was stated that no recovery was sought against the said E. M. Slaughter. Therefore, it is ordered that the opinion herein show that no recovery be had against E. M. Slaughter and that he be discharged with his costs. With these corrections, the motions for re-hearing in all things respectfully are overruled.