Court Opinion

ID: 8454866
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:15:12.649795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.954688
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:05-cr-00322-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.