Court Opinion

ID: 8680087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:36:51.00205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.614033
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Johnson appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED