Court Opinion

ID: 6806908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 18:48:21.697695+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:29.718667
License: Public Domain

Anderson, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Upon the authority of Williamson v. Crawford, 7 Gratt. 202, which is recognized in a later case—Bobauz and al. v. Commonwealth, 24 Gratt. 38—as accurately expounding the law of this State, the court is of opinion that there is no error in the judgment of the court below. Upon a scire facias to revive a judgment, neither a declaration nor rule to plead is necessary. And if the writ is made returnable to rules, as it was in this case, and the defendant makes default, it is unnecessary to give him a rule to plead, but there should be an award of execution, which, if not set aside at the next term, becomes a final judgment as of the last day of the term. There was, consequently, no error in the judgment of the court, which overruled the motion of the defendant below to send the case to rules; nor in .the judgment that the plaintiff have execution against the defendant, &c. Such order was unnecessary, as the judgment at rules, awarding execution, not having been set aside, would, by operation of law, have become a final judgment as of the last day of the term, and the judgment or action of the court, having the same effect, has not been to the prejudice of any right of the plaintiff here.
The court is of opinion, therefore, to affirm the judgment of the court below, with costs and damages.
Judgment aeeirmed.