Court Opinion

ID: 1024038
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:27:21.950107+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:29.906546
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 07-7239

ANGELO B. HAM,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (6:07-cv-01626-DCN)

Submitted:   October 18, 2007             Decided:   October 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Angelo   B.   Ham   appeals    the   district    court’s   order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.          We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.               Ham v. South

Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. 6:07-cv-01626-DCN (D.S.C. Aug.

15, 2007).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                 - 2 -