Court Opinion

ID: 9368210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 08:10:24.471026+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:06.391060
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals

                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                                __________________

                                NO. 09-22-00369-CR
                                __________________

                     DARIO POLO-MEXICANO, Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                      Trial Cause No. 21-359332
__________________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On December 15, 2022, we notified the parties that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless the appellant arranged to file the record or

explained why she needed additional time to do so. The Court, however, received

no response to its request.

      There is also nothing in the record that shows the appellant is entitled to

proceed without paying costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. Because the appellant has

                                         1
not explained why she failed to file the record in her appeal, we dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 31, 2023
Opinion Delivered February 1, 2023
Do Not Publish

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.

                                         2