Court Opinion

ID: 9369290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-08 16:03:55.790036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:14.066925
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                          TORREVIO M. EALY,
                              Appellant,

                                     v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                               No. 4D21-3002

                            [February 8, 2023]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No.
312019CF001141A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed. See State v. Brown, 310 So. 3d 1046, 1048-49 (Fla. 5th DCA
2020) (the defendant’s “consent to separate trials obviated any double
jeopardy or collateral estoppel concerns,” and neither Burr v. State, 576
So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1991) nor State v. Perkins, 349 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1977)
stand “for the proposition that a separate Florida due process right bars
the State from referencing [the defendant’s] firearm possession [addressed
in an initial possession of firearm trial] during a second trial” addressing
the other charges arising from the same incident).

WARNER, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

                           *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.