Court Opinion

ID: 7799510
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-10 15:04:18.749549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:57.586993
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                     DESHONE Q’MAR COPELAND,
                            Appellant,

                                     v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                              No. 4D21-1651

                             [August 10, 2022]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562015CF000189A
and 562012CF003648A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   We affirm the revocation of the defendant’s probation and resulting
sentences in all respects, except for the trial court’s imposition of $50 in
investigative costs and $200 in prosecution costs. We accept the state’s
concession of error as to the imposition of these costs because the state
did not request that the investigative costs be imposed on behalf of the
investigating agency pursuant to section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes
(2019), and the prosecution costs exceed the maximum amount that can
be imposed without “a showing of sufficient proof of higher costs incurred”
as required by section 938.27(8), Florida Statutes (2019).

   As to the investigative costs, “[t]rial courts cannot impose investigative
costs ‘where the record does not demonstrate that the state requested
reimbursement for these costs.’ If these costs are not requested by the
state, they must be stricken and cannot be imposed on remand.”
Bartolone v. State, 327 So. 3d 331, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (quoting
Desrosiers v. State, 286 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019); see also §
938.27(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“investigative costs incurred by law
enforcement agencies” may be imposed only “if requested by such
agencies” (emphasis added)). Thus, we strike the imposition of $50 in
investigative costs.

    As to the prosecution costs, the “[c]osts for the state attorney must be
set in all cases at no less than . . . $100 per case when a felony offense is
charged,” and “[t]he court may set a higher amount upon a showing of
sufficient proof of higher costs incurred.” § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2019).
As we did in Bartolone, “[w]e therefore reverse the prosecution costs and
remand for the trial court to impose $100 in accordance with statute, or
to impose additional costs if sufficient findings are made.” 327 So. 3d at
336 (quoting Guadagno v. State, 291 So. 3d 962, 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)).

   Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WARNER, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

                            *        *         *

    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                     2