Court Opinion

ID: 1009746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:00:56.135557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:35:42.953297
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7860

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HOSEA FANADISE HAMPTON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham.   Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-99-320, CA-02-324-1)

Submitted:   February 6, 2003          Decided:     February 13, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hosea Fanadise Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Hosea Fanadise Hampton seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Hampton has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.     See United States v.

Hampton, Nos. CR-99-320; CA-02-324-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2