Court Opinion

ID: 1046855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-08 02:40:08.441268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:23.469429
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                                 AT JACKSON

                       CRYSTAL STOOTS v. MICHAEL STOOTS

                 Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Gibson County
                         No. 19813     George R. Ellis, Chancellor

                      No. W2011-01948-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 9, 2012

        Because the order appealed is not a final judgment, we dismiss this appeal for lack of
jurisdiction.

                   Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

J. S TEVEN S TAFFORD, J., A LAN E. H IGHERS, P.J.W.S., AND D AVID R. F ARMER, J.

Marc Murdaugh and Gregory W. Minton, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Michael
Stoots.

Crystal Stoots, Trenton, Tennessee, pro se.

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

         By Order entered on December 21, 2011, this Court directed Appellant Michael Stoots
to obtain entry of a final judgment in the trial court within ten (10) days of the entry of that
Order. We noted in our Order that, pursuant to the mandates of Rule 13(b) of the Tennessee
Rules of Appellate Procedure, we had reviewed the appellate record to determine if the Court
has subject matter jurisdiction to hear this matter. After that review, it appeared to the Court
that it does not have jurisdiction, because we could find nothing in the record reflecting that
the trial court adjudicated the following: 1) the request for an award of attorney fees as set

       1
           Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee provides:

       This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse
       or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion
       would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall
       be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION”, shall not be published, and shall not be cited
       or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
forth in the “Complaint for Divorce” filed by Appellee Crystal Stoots in the trial court on
July 15, 2010; 2) the counter-complaint for divorce filed by Appellant Michael Stoots on
August 4, 2010; and, 3) the request for an award of attorney fees as set forth in the “Petition
for Contempt” filed by Appellee Crystal Stoots in the trial court on April 19, 2011. Our
Order also provided “[i]n the event that Appellant does not obtain entry of a final judgment
within the time provided herein, Appellant shall have fifteen (15) days from the entry of this
Order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to appeal an
appealable order or judgment.”

        On January 17, 2012, Appellant filed a pleading styled “Motion to Show Cause Why
This Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed and in the Alternative For Extension of Time to
Obtain Entry of a Final Judgment in the Trial Court” and a memorandum in support of the
motion. Also, on January 23, 2012, Appellant filed a motion seeking an extension of time
to file his brief.

        In his January 17, 2012 motion, Appellant stated that he “does not at this time appeal
the truly post-divorce motions and orders which address contempt of the Final Judgment of
Divorce but does appeal the denial of [his] Motion to Modify alimony based upon a change
in [his] financial condition post entry of the Final Judgment of divorce.” Also, Appellant
attempted to persuade this Court that the order appealed is a final judgment by stating that
the trial court's order “need not address each and every element of damages or relief sought
by either party where it is implicitly clear that the trial court intended to enter a final order
of divorce... .”

        We disagreed and by Order entered on January 27, 2012, we specifically directed
Appellant to obtain entry of a final judgment disposing of the following issues within twenty
(20) days of the entry of that Order: 1) the request for an award of attorney fees as set forth
in the “Complaint for Divorce” filed by Appellee Crystal Stoots in the trial court on July 15,
2010; and, 2) the counter-complaint for divorce filed by Appellant Michael Stoots on August
4, 2010. Moreover, in our Order of January 27, 2012, the Court acknowledged that this
appeal does not pertain to the contempt proceedings in the trial court and did not require
Appellant to obtain a final judgment regarding the contempt proceedings. Finally, we
directed the trial court clerk to transmit a certified, supplemental record to the Clerk of this
Court within five (5) days of the entry of the trial court's order.

        On February 10, 2012, Appellee Crystal Stoots filed a motion requesting that the
Court dismiss this appeal for Appellant's failure to comply with our previous Order. As of
this date, Appellant has not responded to the pending motion. Moreover, the trial court clerk
has not transmitted a supplemental record containing a final judgment of the trial court.
Thus, we find that Appellant has failed to comply with our Order of January 27, 2012, by
obtaining a final judgment in this matter.
       Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that if multiple parties
or multiple claims are involved in an action, any order that adjudicates fewer than all the
claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties is not final or appealable.
Except where otherwise provided, this Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over final
orders. See Bayberry Assoc. v. Jones, 783 S.W.2d 553 (Tenn. 1990). Clearly, the order
appealed is not a final judgment and thus, we must dismiss this appeal.

                                        Conclusion

        Because the trial court has not yet entered a final judgment, the appeal is dismissed
and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
Should a new appeal be filed, the Clerk of this Court shall, upon request of either party,
consolidate the record in this appeal with the record filed in the new appeal. Costs of this
appeal are taxed to the appellant, Michael Stoots, and his surety for which execution may
issue if necessary.

                                           PER CURIAM