Court Opinion

ID: 1022905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:29:49.882251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:17.268470
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  David A. Babb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to return seized money, and quieting title to the money in favor of the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
   
   *263
   

   Babb v. Drug Enforcement Admin.,
  
  No. 6:97-cv-01553-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.