Court Opinion

ID: 724379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 08:44:45+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:15.557864
License: Public Domain

92 F.3d 1183
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Anton Wendell Dion SMITH, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6397.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 23, 1996Decided:  August 5, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Richard L. Williams, District Judge.  (CR-91-23)
Anton Wendell Dion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for return of seized property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e).  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Smith, No. CR-91-23 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 1996).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED