Court Opinion

ID: 4375646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-11 13:38:48.685971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:12.047295
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-820.]

                        DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SKOLNICK.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-820.]
     (No. 2017-1735—Submitted March 7, 2019—Decided March 11, 2019.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Howard Evan Skolnick, Attorney
Registration No. 0061905, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 1, 2018,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent
from the practice of law for a period of one year, with the final six months stayed
on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick, 153 Ohio
St.3d 283, 2018-Ohio-2990, 104 N.E.3d 775.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,
and STEWART, JJ., concur.
                             ________________________