Court Opinion

ID: 9368698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-06 19:00:44.02964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:10.154759
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10712         Document: 00516635832             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10712
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 6, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Clarence Ray Hines, Jr.,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 3:20-CR-37-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Clarence Ray
   Hines, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hines has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10712    Document: 00516635832          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/06/2023

                                  No. 22-10712

   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2