Court Opinion

ID: 844562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 22:51:38.871646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:56.802825
License: Public Domain

723 N.W.2d 840 (2006)
Joseph NOSAL and Christina Nosal, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF POTTERVILLE, Defendant-Appellee, and
Potterville Sewer District, Defendant.
Docket No. 131989. COA No. 268647.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 29, 2006.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.