Court Opinion

ID: 9582093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:22:20.358537+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:26.486465
License: Public Domain

Jordan, Justice,
dissenting.
Findley’s complaint alleged that Sikes was the agent of the appellant in building a Kingsberry home: Interlocutory appeal was granted to consider the appellant’s contention that the trial judge erroneously denied summary judgment to it on its assertion that the relationship of principal and agent did not exist between it and Sikes. After a careful examination of the evidence on the motion for summary judgment, it is my opinion that the appellant-movant did not carry its burden of proving that there was no question of fact on the issue of agency.
I would affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment.
*367I am authorized to state that Justice Hall concurs in this dissent.