Court Opinion

ID: 8675887
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:01:42.162058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.927666
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
George Porterfield appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Porterfield v. Byars, No. 9:13— cv-00497-JMC, 2014 WL 811545 (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2014). Porterfield’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.