Court Opinion

ID: 8746474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 11:09:07.280158+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:00:42.202410
License: Public Domain

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Upon her own statement it is manifest that petitioner is not a citizen. The question whether or not she is an immigrant is one no longer open for determination by the courts as it was when the cases of In re Martorelli (C. C.) 63 Fed. 437, and In re Maiola (C. C.) 67 Fed. 114, were decided, where it is conceded that the person is an alien. All decisions of the inspecting officers touching the right to land, when adverse to such right, are made final, except by appeal- to the superintendent and secretary of the treasury. Act March 3, 1897. The return does not specifically set forth the facts as to her alleged landing, but, assuming them to be as alleged in. the petition, — that an inspector allowed her to go ashore, where she remained a few hours, taking a meal, and then returned to the office, before action by the board of special inquiry,— I do not think she was thereby released from the obligation of satisfying the board that she was not likely to become a public charge.
The writ is dismissed.