Court Opinion

ID: 2874993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 05:56:29.935488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:36.711695
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00287-CV

J. D. Gulley, Appellant

v.

Philip Sueoka, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY
NO. 51,769, HONORABLE GERALD M. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

		This is an appeal from the county court at law's judgment declaring that the breach-of-contract claim brought by J.D. Gulley was barred by res judicata.  However, because it is clear
from the record that Gulley's suit originated in small claims court, we have no jurisdiction to hear
Gulley's appeal and must therefore dismiss for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. Gov't Code
Ann. § 28.053(d) (West 2004); Tex. R. App. P. 60.2(a).

DISCUSSION
		Gulley represents in his appellate brief that his initial suit was heard in justice court 
and appealed to the county court at law.  However, the clerk's record establishes that Gulley's
original petition was filed, and judgment was entered, in Small Claims Court of Precinct 1,
Bell County, Texas, which had jurisdiction over the suit.  See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 28.003
(West Supp. 2007).  The judgment is captioned "IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT" and bears the
seal of the small claims court, see id. § 28.006 (West 2004), and Gulley's petition substantially
complies with the form for actions in small claims court.  Id. § 28.012.
		Under the government code, a dissatisfied party may appeal the judgment of the small
claims court to the county court or county court at law, id. § 28.052(a) (West Supp. 2007), but the
judgment on appeal is "final."  Id. § 28.053(d) (West 2004).  The Texas Supreme Court has
interpreted this provision to mean that the judgment of a county court or county court at law is "final
and not appealable."  Sultan v. Mathew, 178 S.W.3d 747, 751 (Tex. 2005) (emphasis added).  Thus,
"under section 28.053(d) of the Texas Government Code, the courts of appeals lack jurisdiction over
cases originally filed in the small claims court."  Id. at 752; see also Lister v. Walters,
No. 06-07-00137-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 1351, at *4-5 (Tex. App.--Texarkana Feb. 22, 2008,
no pet. h.) (holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider appeal, noting that although several
documents in record were captioned "In Justice Court" and several contained seal of justice court,
plaintiff's petition was captioned "In Small Claims Court" and petition complied with form for
actions in small claims court).
		Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
 
						__________________________________________
						Diane Henson, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed:   May 9, 2008