Court Opinion

ID: 1022379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:21:28.185274+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:21.091719
License: Public Domain

*159
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  Benjamin S. Pace, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As a preliminary matter, we deny Appellees’ motions to dismiss, to strike, and for sanctions. We have also reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pace v. Smith,
  
  No. 5:05-cv00188-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.