Court Opinion

ID: 4947203
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 12:29:09.516377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:08.832784
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
We affirm appellant’s conviction for receiving stolen property (felony), D.C.Code § 22-2205 (1981) — as we conclude we must, see M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971) — on the basis of the second holding of Barkley v. United States, 455 A.2d 412, 415-16 (D.C.1983). However, because we find Barkley unpersuasive authority, and a majority of this division would reverse if free to do so, we express our views in the separate “concurring” opinions below.