Court Opinion

ID: 9352963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-10 17:00:23.526068+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:13.158335
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 22-2985
                       ___________________________

                               Jeffrey Alan Olson

                      lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                         v.

                                Hennepin County

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                     ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                        for the District of Minnesota
                                ____________

                         Submitted: December 12, 2022
                            Filed: January 10, 2023
                                 [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Minnesota resident Jeffrey Olson appeals following the district court’s1
dismissal of his pro se civil action and denial of his postjudgment motions. We

      1
       The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration,
as Olson did not present a basis for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)
or 60(b), see Peterson v. Travelers Indem. Co., 867 F.3d 992, 997 (8th Cir. 2017), or
in denying leave to amend, see United States v. Mask of Ka-Nefer-Nefer, 752 F.3d
737, 743 (8th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

                                          -2-