Court Opinion

ID: 7685837
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:19:31.343803+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:35.835554
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellants’ convictions and sentences. The sentencing claim pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), is rejected because the consecutive habitual offender sentences were imposed for crimes which were part of separate criminal episodes. See Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 633 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 980 (Fla.1994).
ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
BENTON, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.