Court Opinion

ID: 993470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:08:16.534931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:54.646335
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6944

BERNARD THOMAS HORTON,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ARCHIE GEE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
97-334)

Submitted:   October 10, 1997          Decided:     November 12, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Thomas Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Appellant's motion to
amend his pleadings, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Horton
v. Gee, No. CA-97-334 (D. Md. June 19, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2