Court Opinion

ID: 8479856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 16:46:44.876727+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.244457
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Donnell Rudisill appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048-MR-7 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.