Court Opinion

ID: 8456874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:16:43.038453+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.908412
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ali Swinton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Swinton v. Gum, No. 3:12-cv-01587-CMC, 2013 WL 3197077 (D.S.C. June 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *942this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.