Court Opinion

ID: 9662961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 23:24:12.796665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:44.239676
License: Public Domain

BRYAN, Judge,
dissenting.
In her application for rehearing, Lawson argues that the cases upon which the main opinion relies in overruling Collateral Investment Co. v. Pilgrim, 421 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App.1982), are distinguishable, that this court should apply the holding in Pilgrim in the cases now before us instead of overruling Pilgrim, and that the holding in Pilgrim mandates the reversal of the trial court’s judgments in the cases now before us. Because I find those arguments persuasive, I respectfully dissent.