Court Opinion

ID: 999343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:24:11.145987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:10.855598
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-6725

DAVID GARCIA,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. M. VANYUR, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-110-5-F(3))

Submitted:   July 22, 1999                 Decided:    July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Garcia, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David Garcia appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Garcia v. Vanyur, No. CA-99-110-5-F(3) (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2