Court Opinion

ID: 9392383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-04 18:00:23.41824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:45.646071
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10939         Document: 00516738114             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/04/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-10939
                                                                                        FILED
                                                                                      May 4, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                           Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Carlos Daniel Torres-Diaz,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:21-CR-421-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Daniel Torres-Diaz has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Torres-Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10939      Document: 00516738114          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/04/2023

                                    No. 22-10939

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review.
            Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the
   district court for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to include 18
   U.S.C. § 2 in the list of violated statutory provisions. See Fed. R. Crim.
   P. 36.

                                             2