Court Opinion

ID: 4923829
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-22 04:34:33.430277+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:12.536216
License: Public Domain

DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE,
CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶ 31; I agree with the majority’s findings of misconduct, and most of the sanction imposed. But the notion that we can remove Bill Weisenberger from office after the voters already have done so is pure fiction. Justice Coleman understandably is concerned that the bench, bar, and public should be on notice that Weisenberger’s conduct merits removal from office. But his concern would be eliminated by simply declaring that if Weisenberger still were in office, he would be removed from it. This approach would comport more closely with logic and the truth.