Court Opinion

ID: 4803084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-21 02:44:21.984151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:16.717887
License: Public Domain

EMAS, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
For the reasons expressed in my dissent to the denial of motion for rehearing en banc in Geter v. State, 115 So.3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in the instant case to the extent it holds that the rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct appeal.