Court Opinion

ID: 8452977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:19:45.341795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.440316
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Jones appeals .the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the-record and find no reversible error, given that Jones is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 3:06-cr-00044-REP-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.