Court Opinion

ID: 6168168
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 19:28:42.166075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:42.434728
License: Public Domain

George D. Ogden, J.
Upon the complaint and notice of motion, with accompanying affidavit, it appears that the infant plaintiff herein was approximately 7 years of age at the time of the accident; his examination before trial is sought. This court has been unable to find any decided cases on the subject, except Blagburn v. Milrita Realty Corp, (204 Misc. 74). In that case *853the court held that an infant plaintiff 11 years of age (nearly 12), who was sought to be examined before trial, should appear before the court or official referee and be examined, if found qualified to testify.
As to his qualifications to testify, it appears that the infant plaintiff in the above-entitled action was of tender years at the time of the accident, and the court holds, as a matter of discretion, that he is not qualified and his testimony would not be accepted; therefore, his examination before trial is denied. The motion by defendant for such examination of infant plaintiff is, in all respects, denied, with $10 costs.
Submit order.