Court Opinion

ID: 820613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-02-14 21:02:27.414293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:06.674299
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FEB 14 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO CORDERO-PONCE,                          No. 11-70784

               Petitioner,                        Agency No. A096-460-069

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

               Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted February 11, 2013 **

Before:        FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

       Alejandro Cordero-Ponce, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the factual findings underlying the

agency’s determination that an applicant is not eligible for CAT protection, Silaya

v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for

review.

      Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Cordero-Ponce’s CAT

claim because he failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if

returned to Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011)

(claim of possible torture speculative).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

                                           2                                    11-70784