Court Opinion

ID: 8017373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:06:20.72745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:26.386443
License: Public Domain

VALLIANT, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for $4500damages for the alleged negligent killing of the plaintiff’s husband by the defendant railroad company. The appeal was taken to the Kansas City *622Court of Appeals. It was contended in that court that the plaintiff’s right of action was under section 2864, Revised Statutes 1809, wherein the amount to be recovered was fixed as a penalty at the sum of $5000. In view of that contention the Kansas City Court of Appeals held that as $5000 was the sum' in dispute it had no jurisdiction, and for that reason it transferred the cause to this court. Since the cause has been pending in this court the General Assembly has passed an act raising the limit of the pecuniary jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to $7500', but at the date of that act, June 12, 1909' (Laws 1909', p. 397), this cause had not been submitted in this court, and therefore by force of the terms of that act this court was. required to transfer this cause back to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, but that was not done then because the case was not brought to the notice of the court.
In going through the briefs we discover that the point is presented that there is a conflict in two decisions, one of the Kansas City Court of Appeals and the other in the St. Louis Court of Appeals (Marsh v. Railroad, 104 Mo. App. 577, and Casey v. Railroad, 116 Mo. App. 235) on the question of whether a pers'on can recover less than $5000' under section 2864, Revised Statutes 1899. But this case was not certified to this court under section 6 of ' the Amendment of 1884, authorizing a court of appeals to so certify a cause when, in the opinion of one of the judges, the decision is contrary to a previous decision of this court or of another court of appeals. Indeed until the Kansas City Court of Appeals had decided this case there could have been no such conflict, and no such conflict as between the two cases last named can now arise, because this court'has settled that conflict. [Casey v. Railroad, 205 Mo. 721.]
The cause of action arose in 1903 and therefore the amendment of 1905 to section 2864, Revised Statutes *6231899, whereby the penalty was fixed at not less than $2000, nor more than $10,000, has no application.
As the case now stands there is nothing in it except . a controversy over a money judgment of less than $7500, therefore this court has no jurisdiction of it. The cause is transferred to the Kansas City Court of Appeals.
All concur.