Court Opinion

ID: 9368792
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-07 01:00:25.743326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:10.968271
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10790         Document: 00516636073             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10790
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 6, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Brad Keith,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:18-CR-295-5
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brad Keith in his
   appeal of his revocation of supervised release and resulting six-month
   sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Keith has not filed a response.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10790     Document: 00516636073          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/06/2023

                                   No. 22-10790

          During the pendency of this appeal, Keith completed the sentence
   imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from
   custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the
   instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v.
   Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is
   DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   DENIED as unnecessary.

                                        2