Court Opinion

ID: 654890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:42:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:32.461060
License: Public Domain

7 F.3d 226
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Eric SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND;  Sewall B.Smith, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6698.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 20, 1993.Decided:  September 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Eric Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Kathryn Grill Graeff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, for Appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Eric Smith seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Smith v. Attorney General, No. CA-93-1220-JFM (D. Md. June 24, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED