Court Opinion

ID: 2815258
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-08 15:13:30.598092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:57.263710
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                       FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

KEVIN BROOME,                          NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                       FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                     CASE NO. 1D14-4566

STATE OF FLORIDA,

      Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public
Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jessica Judith DaSilva, Assistant Attorney
General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

      In this appeal from his conviction for felony battery, appellant claims the

trial court committed reversible error in denying his request for a jury instruction

on the justifiable use of nondeadly force. A defendant is entitled to have the jury

instructed on the law applicable to his theory of defense if there is any evidence to
support such a theory, even if the only evidence comes from the defendant’s own

testimony. Bozeman v. State, 714 So. 2d 570, 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Although

appellant did not request the instruction at the charge conference, the request was

still timely when it was made after closing arguments and renewed before the jury

retired to deliberate. See Curington v. State, 704 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA

1998); Ramsaran v. State, 664 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Rogers v.

State, 626 So. 2d 339, 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 597 So. 2d 377,

379 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Bunn v. State, 363 So. 2d 16, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Based on his trial testimony, appellant was entitled to have the jury instructed on

the justifiable use of nondeadly force. See Gregory v. State, 937 So. 2d 180, 182

(Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction for felony

battery and remand for a new trial.

      REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

RAY, SWANSON, MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

                                        2