Court Opinion

ID: 3166460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-30 20:06:38.098309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:45.965103
License: Public Domain

People v Sunderland (2015 NY Slip Op 09704)

People v Sunderland

2015 NY Slip Op 09704

Decided on December 30, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 30, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2014-06381
 (Ind. No. 2304-12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJeremy Sunderland, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Marcia R. Kucera of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed December 18, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Santana, 122 AD3d 949, 949; People v Lian Qiu, 121 AD3d 918, 919), and, thus, does not preclude review of his claim that his sentence is excessive. The sentence, however, is not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN, ROMAN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court