Court Opinion

ID: 623517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-24 01:02:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.555861
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              FEB 23 2012

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 11-10146

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00204-JCM

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
JOSE ALVIDREZ-UBANDA,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Nevada
                     James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted February 21, 2012 **

Before:        FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

       Jose Alvidrez-Ubanda appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month

sentence for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvidrez-Ubanda’s counsel has filed a brief

stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

         Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

         DISMISSED.

                                          2                                    11-10146