Court Opinion

ID: 9423128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:06:07.840205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:42.452372
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Stewart,
concurring.
I concur in the Court’s determination that the Pennsylvania statute here in question cannot be squared with the standards of the Fourteenth Amendment, but for reasons somewhat different from those upon which the Court relies. It seems to me that, despite the Court’s disclaimer,* much of the reasoning in its opinion serves to cast grave constitutional doubt upon the settled practice of many States to leave to the unguided discretion of a jury the nature and degree of punishment to be imposed upon a person convicted of a criminal offense. Though I have serious questions about the wisdom of that practice, its constitutionality is quite a different matter. In the present case it is enough for me that Pennsylvania allows a jury to punish a defendant after finding him not guilty. That, I think, violates the most rudimentary concept of due process of law.

 See n. 8, ante.