Court Opinion

ID: 7501640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:25:00.994221+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:16.427620
License: Public Domain

UPCHURCH, Judge,
concurring specially-
While I concur in the result, I question the logic of a rule which imposes a higher standard of proof for estoppel, Jarrard v. Associates Discount Corporation, 99 So.2d 272 (Fla.1957), than for fraud and deceit, Rigot v. Bucci, 245 So.2d 51 (Fla.1971), Blaeser Development Corporation v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Martin County, 375 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).