Court Opinion

ID: 9633670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 11:56:25.702528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:42.742513
License: Public Domain

McInturff, C.J.
(concurring) — I concur in the majority's opinion, but I wish to note further that H & S's position was substantially different from that of the claimant in Hasek v. Terrene Excavators, Inc., 44 Wn. App. 554, 723 P.2d 1153 (1986). Mr. Hasek held a recorded materialmen's lien on this same property, i.e., his interest arose out of his work and the materials he incorporated in the property. In contrast, H & S's judgment lien was limited to its debtor's interest in the property. The foreclosure action determined that the debtor had no interest left after satisfying the various materialmen's liens.
Reconsideration denied March 15, 1988.