Court Opinion

ID: 9756027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 21:03:54.410588+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:13.978218
License: Public Domain

SPAETH, Judge,
concurring:
Whether appellant’s suit was governed by the principles in Vento v. Vento, 256 Pa.Super. 91, 389 A.2d 615 (1978), or by 68 P.S. §§ 501 et seq. (1965), repealed in part by the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 20002(a) [1092] (1979 Pamphlet), the result is the same. Dorothy Reeping was not and could not be a party to appellant’s partition suit. Furthermore, Dorothy Reeping was not entitled to the proceeds from the foreclosure sale of the parties’ realty, for she failed to show that she had a lien on the proceeds. I therefore concur in the result reached by the majority.