Court Opinion

ID: 2926758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:37:50.224141+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:27.971370
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00683-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ROBERT BECHO,                                                                Appellant,

                                           v.

ARACELI RAMIREZ,                                    Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 138th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

                   Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss this

appeal. According to the motion, the parties have remarried and reached an agreement

to settle and compromise their differences. They ask this Court to render judgment

effectuating the parties’ agreement. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).
       The parties have agreed that appellee confesses error in the judgment below of the

trial court’s grant of a permanent injunction against appellant; that appellee confesses error

in the judgment below of the trial court’s order that appellant owes retroactive child support;

that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for a permanent injunction;

and that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for retroactive child

support. The parties’ remarriage renders moot the issues concerning conservatorship,

possession, and access.

       We GRANT the joint motion to dismiss. We RENDER judgment effectuating the

parties' settlement agreement, and DISMISS the appeal.              In accordance with the

agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d).

                                                                 PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 2nd day of July, 2009.

                                              2