Court Opinion

ID: 1035529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-30 00:00:45.843633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:29.151563
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 13-1437

WALDO FENNER,

                      Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

CITY OF DURHAM/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,

                      Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW)

Submitted:   July 25, 2013                     Decided: July 29, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waldo Fenner, Appellant Pro Se. Emmanuel Dubois McGirt, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Waldo    Fenner      appeals    the    district     court’s    order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief   on   Fenner’s    42    U.S.C.    §§ 1983,    1985,     1986    (2006)

complaint.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.     Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment,

No. 1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013).                We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately    presented   in   the   materials    before    this    court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                      2