Court Opinion

ID: 7114893
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:30:45.531828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:52.181235
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Shams Mouzon, a 93-year old woman, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Aeroflot Russian International Airlines, in *846her action pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1601. Mouzon alleged that defendants abandoned her during a lay-over at San Francisco International Airport (“SFO”), thereby forcing her to spend two nights in the airport without food, water or other care. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s findings of fact from a bench trial, Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc., 54 F.3d 570, 576 (9th Cir.1995), and its conclusions of law de novo, Howard v. Crystal Cruises, Inc., 41 F.3d 527, 529 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm.
The district court’s conclusion that Mouzon was contributorily negligent for the problems she suffered while waiting for her son at SFO is not clearly erroneous. See Exxon, 54 F.3d at 576. Therefore, the district court properly concluded that the negligence cause of action was barred by the terms of Aeroflot’s International Passenger Rules Tariff. See Harby v. Saadeh, 816 F.2d 436, 439 (9th Cir.1987).
We are unpersuaded by Mouzon’s remaining legal arguments.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.