Court Opinion

ID: 9366711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-27 19:00:37.36429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:54.819800
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10779         Document: 00516625461             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/27/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                      ____________                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                      FILED
                                       No. 22-10779                            January 27, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                                                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________
                                                                                     Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   John Alex Vigil,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 3:21-CR-83-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John Alex Vigil
   seeks to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Vigil has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10779    Document: 00516625461         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/27/2023

                                 No. 22-10779

   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2