Court Opinion

ID: 4095905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-05 16:27:10.204802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:45:18.663617
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-85,337-01

                            EX PARTE MAURICE SPAIN, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 731290-A IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of tampering or

fabricating physical evidence and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. While on

supervised release for this conviction, Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver

a controlled substance. He was sentenced to a concurrent term of ten years’ imprisonment, and the

supervised release for the tampering sentence was revoked.

        Applicant argues that prison officials must release him to non-discretionary mandatory
                                                                                                          2

supervision on the 25-year tampering sentence imposed in 1997. TDCJ has responded as follows:

“[T]o be released to mandatory supervision, an offender must be eligible to be released on all

offenses. [The tampering sentence] is eligible for ‘mandatory supervision’ and [the concurrent drug

sentence] is eligible for ‘discretionary mandatory supervision.’ TDCJ calculates the projected

mandatory supervision release date on the controlling mandatory supervision eligible offense, in this

case [the tampering sentence].” The Board continues, “Applicant will be released to mandatory

supervision on [the 25-year tampering sentence], when he is approved for either parole or

discretionary mandatory supervision by the Board on [the 10-year drug sentence] or when he

discharges [that drug sentence in flat time] on 07/15/2017.”

        We order that this application be filed and set for submission to examine the legality of the

policy of not “releasing” a prisoner to mandatory supervision on one concurrent sentence until the

prisoner is “eligible for release” on all concurrent sentences. The parties are invited to brief the issue.

The Office of General Counsel of TDCJ is also invited to file a brief.

        The trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant.

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date

of this order, a supplemental transcript containing either the order appointing counsel or a statement

that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court within 90 days of the date of

this order.

Filed: November 2, 2016
Do not publish