Court Opinion

ID: 8679107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:02:56.319645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:28.088442
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for re*591duction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 3:00-cr-00244-REP-1 (ED.Va. Oct. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.