Court Opinion

ID: 997933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:03:56.509682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:07.066947
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7330

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-98-580-5)

Submitted:   February 11, 1999         Decided:     February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order dis-

missing his action seeking return of property under Fed. R. Crim.

P. 41(e).     We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we grant Maxwell’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis, but affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.     See United States v. Maxwell, No. CA-98-580-5

(S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2