Court Opinion

ID: 2980954
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-22 19:18:24.257886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:12.131883
License: Public Domain

Order filed February 12, 2015

                                      In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                   ____________

                              NO. 14-15-00062-CV
                                   ____________

               IRENE SILVA AND DAVID SILVA, Appellants

                                         V.

                     THE CITY OF PASADENA, Appellees

                    On Appeal from the 189th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2013-36912

                                    ORDER

      This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 10, 2014. The notice of
appeal was due January 8, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however,
filed his notice of appeal on January 9, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date
for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied
when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt
v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to
extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied,
appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to
support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974
S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
      Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to
file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex.
R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will
dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

                                                PER CURIAM