Court Opinion

ID: 9855079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 06:19:10.922352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:39.904608
License: Public Domain

Dethmbrs, J.
(dissenting). In School District for the City of Holland v. Holland Education Association (1968), 380 Mich 314, Mr. Justice Kelly wrote that the Hutchinson act  was constitutional, that the *581teachers involved were public employees subject to the act’s no-strike provisions, and that the courts have jurisdiction to restrain prohibited strikes by public employees. He held that the act had been violated, that this was properly enjoined, and that the order of the circuit court for injunction should be affirmed. I agreed with Justice Kelly’s opinion then. I do now. It applies here. Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court should he affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
Kelly, J., concurred with Dethmers, J.