Court Opinion

ID: 9352728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-09 17:01:00.207662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:58:14.829994
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-1227    Document: 69      Page: 1    Filed: 01/09/2023

            NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                   ______________________

                     IOENGINE, LLC,
                        Appellant

                              v.

                     INGENICO INC.,
                        Appellee

  KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Com-
 merce for Intellectual Property and Director of the
    United States Patent and Trademark Office,
                      Intervenor
                ______________________

              2021-1227, 2021-1331, 2021-1332
                  ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-
 00416, IPR2019-00879, and IPR2019-00929.
             -------------------------------------------------

                     INGENICO INC.,
                        Appellant

                              v.

                     IOENGINE, LLC,
                         Appellee
Case: 21-1227    Document: 69      Page: 2     Filed: 01/09/2023

 2                             IOENGINE, LLC   v. INGENICO INC.

  KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Com-
 merce for Intellectual Property and Director of the
    United States Patent and Trademark Office,
                      Intervenor
                ______________________

                   2021-1375, 2021-1376
                  ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-
 00879, and IPR2019-00929.
                  ______________________

                      ON MOTION
                  ______________________

                         ORDER
     Ingenico, Inc. moves without opposition to voluntarily
 dismiss its cross-appeals, Appeal Nos. 2021-1375 and 2021-
 1376, in the above consolidated action, confirming that the
 parties agree to each bear their own costs relative to the
 cross appeals.
     Upon consideration thereof,
     IT IS ORDERED THAT:
      (1) Ingenico’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the cross-
 appeals is granted. The revised official captions are re-
 flected above.
     (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
     (3) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this or-
Case: 21-1227      Document: 69     Page: 3   Filed: 01/09/2023

 IOENGINE, LLC   v. INGENICO INC.                           3

 der to the merits panel assigned to this case.
                                     FOR THE COURT

  January 9, 2023                    /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
       Date                          Peter R. Marksteiner
                                     Clerk of Court

 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to only Appeal Nos. 2021-
 1375 and 2021-1376): January 9, 2023