Court Opinion

ID: 858655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-04-22 19:13:05.873983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:12.782448
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 13-1027

RICHARD GRAVELY,

                      Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

                      Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston.  John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:12-cv-05444)

Submitted:   April 18, 2013                 Decided:   April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Richard   Gravely    appeals   the   district   court’s    order

accepting     the   recommendation    of   the    magistrate   judge    and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006).       We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.          Gravely v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, No.

2:12-cv-05444 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 26, 2012).          We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                     2