Court Opinion

ID: 7985752
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 01:25:20.691142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:35:11.789422
License: Public Domain

Cooper, J.,
delivered the opinion of. the court.
This is an application to file and docket a record in this case, the clerk of this court having declined to file the papers presented as the record. They are now submitted to the court by counsel for the appellant, as constituting a sufficient record under rule four which is as follows : “ By agreement of parties or their attorneys, made in writing and attested by the clerk of the court in which any cause may be pending or record existing (which agreement shall be filed and made a part of the transcript of such record), such parts of the record and proceedings as shall be so agreed shall constitute the transcript of the record to be brought to this court; and shall be certified as' such and be considered a full transcript in this court for the consideration and final adjudication of the cause here.”
*46The record now presented contains what purport to be copies of papers, proceedings, judgments, and orders of the lower court, together with a bill of exceptions, containing all the testimony ofFered on the trial in that court. Attached to these appears an agreement signed by the counsel of both parties that the same shall» be filed in this court, “ and treated as a full and perfect transcript of the record in this case, appellees waiving citation and petition for appeal and all like informalities, and hereby entering their appearance in said case.” The authentication consists of a certificate by the circuit clerk under the seal of said court as follows: “Personally appeared * * * L. Brame and J. B. Harris, counsel for plaintiff and defendants respectively, in the above entitled cause lately pending in the Circuit Court of the First District of Hinds County, and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing agreement as to the transcript of the record on appeal in said cause, and I do hereby attest and authenticate the same.”
The object of the rule is to prevent unnecessary costs and labor in preparing a record for this court, by relieving the appellant, with the consent of the appellee, from the necessity of preparing a full transcript, when the point to be decided here may be presented by a consideration of a part only of the record as it remains in the lower court. It is, however, still required that the transcript shall be of a part at least of a record remaining in the lower court, and certified as such by the clerk of the court in which it remains. It is not sufficient that the parties or their counsel agree that certain papers shall be considered and treated as a record ; it is necessary for the clerk of the lower court to certify that the transcript, as far as it goes, is a transcript of the record remaining in his office. The agreement of counsel can neither create a record nor take the place of the authentication by the proper officer; it can only serve as a sufficient explanation of the omission of some part of the record.
Motion denied.