Court Opinion

ID: 7686521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:20:45.566629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:36.452351
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We reverse, however, the trial court’s assessments for costs of prosecution and the Hillsborough County court improvement fund. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law of Sutton.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
FRANK, C.J., and THREADGILL and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.