Court Opinion

ID: 6916815
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:44:20.988939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:40.833304
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order dismissing his complaint because of his wilful failure to appear for the taking of his deposition. The facts are summarized in Judge Sugarman’s memorandum decision. His discretionary power to make the order is clear. Rule 37(d), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S. C.A. As this court stated in Gill v. Stolow, 2 Cir., 240 F.2d 669, 670, the proper disciplining of a party under circumstances of default must usually be left to the control of the trial judge.1 We see no abuse of discretion under the circumstances disclosed by the record. The judgment is affirmed.

. See also First Iowa Hydro Elec. Coop. v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & E. Co., 8 Cir., 245 F.2d 613, 628, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 871, 78 S.Ct. 122, 2 L.Ed.2d 76.