Court Opinion

ID: 6757805
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:28:54.962196+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:30.132887
License: Public Domain

Clifford F. Brown, J.,
concurring. Because the per curiam opinion recognizes the continuing validity of 'the enigmatic “some evidence” rule (see dissents in State, ex rel. Kilburn, v. Indus. Comm. [1982], 1 Ohio St. 3d 103, at 105-106; State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. [1982], 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, at 399-400 [23 O.O.3d 358]; State, ex rel. Teece, v. Indus. Comm. [1981], 68 Ohio St. 2d 165, at 170-174 [22 O.O.3d 400]), I concur in the judgment only.