Court Opinion

ID: 22876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:03:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:47.032757
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-40424
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO MANUEL MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. L-00-CR-39-1
                       --------------------
                         December 14, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Francisco Manuel Martinez-Hernandez ("Martinez") appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal

reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Martinez’s plea agreement provided that he waived his right to

appeal his sentence.   The district court did not make a specific

inquiry into whether Martinez understood that he was

relinquishing his right to appeal, and thus the record is not

adequate to demonstrate that Martinez knowingly and voluntarily

waived his right to appeal.   See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(C).   Under

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 00-40424
                                -2-

these circumstances, the waiver cannot be enforced against

Martinez.

     Martinez argues that his prior felony conviction was an

element of the offense of conviction.     Martinez acknowledges that

his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.

Ct. 2348 (2000).   This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-

Torres, 523 U.S. at 235.

     The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.