Court Opinion

ID: 8627742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 14:49:56.346793+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:40.152270
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Charles Tyson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying *262relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tyson v. Eagleton, No. 6:06-cv-01686-PMD, 2007 WL 2477337 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.