Court Opinion

ID: 4643295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-15 22:12:32.960759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:06.204908
License: Public Domain

12/15/2020
                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                             AT JACKSON
                               September 15, 2020 Session

               TIMOTHY A. BAXTER v. JENNIFER D. ROWAN

                 Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Madison County
                    No. 55-48873        Larry McKenzie, Judge
                     ___________________________________

                            No. W2018-02209-COA-R3-JV
                        ___________________________________

KENNY ARMSTRONG, J., concurring separately.

        I concur in the majority’s holding that an unwed father, who previously executed a
VAP, has standing to sue for custody and visitation rights to his minor child. I also
concur in the holding reversing the trial court’s award of visitation rights to the paternal
grandmother. I write separately only to highlight my concern about the procedure used
by the unwed father in this case to obtain his visitation rights. Here, father filed his
motion to obtain visitation rights under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-301.
However, from my research, section 36-6-301 is inapplicable to custody and visitation
proceedings that involve parents who have never been married. Rather, I am of the
opinion that, in cases such as the one at bar, where the parents were never married,
Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-2-311 is the only mechanism by which visitation
rights may be obtained. Section 36-2-311 is the parentage statute that specifically
addresses a trial court’s authority to make an order determining custody and visitation
rights where unwed parents are involved. Graham v. Caples, 325 S.W.3d 578, 582
(Tenn. 2010) (citation omitted) (“Where a conflict is presented between two statutes, a
more specific statutory provision takes precedence over a more general provision.”).
Section 36-2-311 provides, in pertinent part, that, “Upon establishing parentage, the court
shall make an order declaring the father of the child. This order shall include the
following . . . [d]etermination of visitation or parental access pursuant to chapter 6 of this
title.” Because father is claiming visitation rights based on his execution of a VAP and
because mother and father were never married, I conclude that the only mechanism by
which father may seek visitation is through section 36-2-311.

                                                     s/ Kenny Armstrong
                                                  KENNY ARMSTRONG, JUDGE