Court Opinion

ID: 3652039
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:06:23.253345+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:53.213911
License: Public Domain

The plaintiff sues for possession of land, making the usual allegations of title in herself and wrongful possession of defendant. The answer denies these allegations and avers nothing more. On the trial the plaintiff showed title, and defendant offered to prove by a witness seven years' possession under an unregistered and lost deed, and by another that she had a deed for the premises which was lost and had not been registered, which evidence was excluded. The offer of this evidence was an admission that defendant could not make out her title in a court of law, and that she had to invoke the aid of a court of equity, as the deed was lost and had not been re-established under statutory provisions. In order to make such evidence competent, *Page 241 
it was necessary for defendant to set up the facts in her answer as a defense in a court of equity, which was not done. This would also have been notice to the plaintiff. Tripless v. Witherspoon, 74 N.C. 475; Hinton v.Pritchard, 102 N.C. 94.
Affirmed.
Cited: Patterson v. Galliher, 122 N.C. 515.
(353)