Court Opinion

ID: 4142890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 03:27:11.458502+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:50.048631
License: Public Domain

Honorable Compton White
County Auditor
Fre’estoneCounty
Fairfield, Texas
Dear Sir:                      Opinion No. O-3473
                               Re: Whether the commissioners’
                                    court catilegally order a-
                                    loc.5~1
                                          option election to be
                                    he,ldJune 28, 1941, date of
                                    the special senatorial
                                    election, with the same
                                    election judges and clerks;
                                    and another related question.
Your letter of April 2$th, requesting an opinion of this
Department, reads as follows:
“A petition will be presented to the commissioners’ court of
Freestone County on May 12th, 1941, to order a beer election
In’Freestone County. If this election Is ordered it would
necessarily have to be held by June 2nd, 1941. CciuLtlithe
court legally pass this petition to June 9th and order the
election held June.28th, the date set for the election of a
United States Senator, using the same election judges and
clerks to hold both elections.
In our county budget for the year 1941 I caloulated and the
commlssionersf cmrt approved funds for.holding one election
in 1941. Would it be within my power in enforoing   compliance
with the county budget to require the oommisaionersl court
to declare an emergency to pay for the beer electi;;el;othe
event it Is held before the Senatorial election?
the fact that the senatorial election has already been ordered
I sm taking the position that funds set up in our budget for
election expense are already obligated and that any other
charge against our budget for eleotion will  have to be classed
as an emergency by the commissioners’ court.   An early reply
to the above questions will be appreciated.”
Article 666-32, Vernon's     %notated   Penal code, provides:

*The ‘ommissioners   Court   of each county in the State upon its
_     -
Hon. Compton iihite,page 2, O-3473

own motion may order an election to be held by the qualified
voters in said county, to determine whether or not the sale
of liquors shall be prohibited or legalized in such county,
and such Court shall order a local option election whenever
petitioned to do so by an many as ten (10) per cent of the
qualified voters of said county, or of any justice precinct,
city or town, taking the votes for Governor at the last
preceding general election as the basis for determining the
qualified voters in any such county, or political subdivision.
After the first local option election held as provided In
this Act, in any county9 justf,ceprecinct, incorporated town,
or city, no subsequent election upon the same issue in the
same political subdivision shall be held within one (1) year
from the date of the preceding local option election in said
oountys or said political subdivision of said county."
Artfole 666-33 of said Code provides:
 "When the Commissioners Court shall order an election as
 herein provided for, it shall be the duty of said Court to
 order such election to be held at the voting places within
 such subdivision or county upon a day not less than ten (10)
 nor more than twenty '20) days from the date of said order,,
 and the.order thus made shall express the object of such elea-
'"'tion'andshall be held to be prima facie evidence that all the
 provisions necessary to give It validity or to clothe the
 Court with jurisdiction to make it valid, have been duly oom-
 plied with, provided that said Court shall appoint such offi-
 cers to hold such elections as now required to hold general
 elections."

 Article 666-34 of the Code provides that the election shall
 be held and the return-thereof made in conformity with the
 provisions of the General Laws of the State, and by the
 election officers appointed and qualified under euoh laws; and
 Article 666-36 provides that the holding of the election
 by the officers shall conform to the General Election Laws in
 force regulating elections.
  ,.
 Article 666-36 of said Code provides%
 "The officers holding such eleotion shall, in all respects
 not herein specified, conform to the General Election Laws in
 force regulating elections and after the polls are closed
 proceed to count the votes and within three (3) days thereafter
 make due report of said election to the aforesaid Court. The
 provisions of the General Election Laws shall be followed in
 calling and conducting said election where not inconsistent
 herewith."
Hon, Compton White, page 3, O-3473

Article 666-40 of the Code provides that the Commissionn&f
Court upon petition asprovided shall order as>provided in..
Article 666-32, supra, local option elections for the purpose
of determining whether alcoholic beverages of the various
types and alcoholic oontents shall be legalized or prohibited.
Under Chapter 12, Article 3088, Vernon's Annotated civil
Statutes, it is provided that every law regulating or in any
mahner governing elections or the holding of primaries in this
State shall be held to apply to each electfon of a candidate for
a United States Senator so long as they.are not in conflict
with the United States Constitution or Laws of Congress regula-
ting the election of senators or the provisions of Chapter 12.
This chapter, relating to filling the office of united States
Senator, expressly designates an electionheld for the purpose
of filling a vacancy in the Senate as a special e$e,&t4on.
In holding a local option election the commissioners' court
is required to appoint such officers to hold.~Phe&&sGtion
as now required to hold general elections. At this special
election to fill the vacancy in the United states Senate, it
is expressly provided that every law regulating or in any
manner governing elections in this State shall apply. wb find
no prohibition against the holding of a local option election on
the same day a special election to fill the vacancy in the
United States Senate is held. It has been held by this Depart-
ment that a local option election may be held on the same day
at which a general election is held. See Opinion No. O-2853,
yo,lume2, p. 330, fieportsof the Attorney General, 1940.
As to the conduet of the two elections on the same day, we
run into some difficulty. We held in a recent opinion, O-
3438, approved May 21st, 1941$ a copy of which is hereto at-
tached, that the forthcoming senatorial election to fill a
vacancy, being a special election, the proviso of Article
2938, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, which provides for the
appointment of one presiding judge, one assistant judge and
two clerks to be appointed 'by the commissioners' court, con-
trols. Such provision, however, in so far as fixing the
official's compensation, no 1onEer controls but is superseded
by Article 2943, Vernon's Annotated civil Statutes, with the
amounts fixed in the later statute controlling.
Since the 'election judges and cler$s to be appointed for the
special senatorial election are ssparate and distinct from
those authorized to conduct general elections, local option
elections and primary elections as regularly appointed under
Articles 2937 and 2938, Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, the can-
duct of both elections by the same officials, should they
be held on the same day, is not authorized. It will   further be
Hon. Compton Uhite, page 4, O-3473

noted that not only the presfding and assistant judges, but
the two clerks are to be appointed by the commissioners
court under the controlling provision.
Should both a local option election and the forthcoming sena-
torial or special election be held on the sgme day, it being
our view that separate election judges and clerks to conduct
the elections would be required, it naturally follows that
sep'arateand distinct ballot boxes should be used.
 The Texas Liquor Control Act or the above mentioned statuges
ado not require the commissioners' court to order the election
 the same day the required petition is presented. #whenthe
 court acts upon said petition, and we think the law requires
 the court to act within a reasonable time, the statutes re-
 quire a date to be set not less than ten (10) nor more than
 twent (20) days from the date of said order, (Article 666-33,
 supra?I
Article 689a-11, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, in part,
provides:

 . . . The Court shall have authority to make such changes in
the budget as in their judgment the law warrants and the
interest of the taxpayers demand. When the budget has been
finally approved by the Commissioners' Court, the budget, as
a:qprovedby the Court shall be filed with the Clerk of the
'CountyCourt, and taxes levied only in accordance therewith,
and no expenditures of the funds of the county shall thereafter
be made except in strict compliance with the budget as adopted
by the Court. 'Except that emergency expendftures, in case of
grave publfc necessity, to meet unusual and unforeseen condf-
tions which could not, by reasonably dilfgent thought and
attention, have been included in the original budget, may from
time to tSme be authorfzed by the Court as amendments to the
original budget. In all.cases where such amendment to the
original budget is made, a copy of the order of the Court
amendIng the budget shall be filed with the Clerk of-the
County Court, and attached to the budget originally adopted."
Article   689a-20, Vernones Civil Statutes, ;provides:
"Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed as precluding
the Legislature from making changes in the budget for State
purposes or prevent the County Commissioners' Court from making
changes in the budget for county purposes or-,preventthe
governing body'of any incorporated city or town from making
changes in the budget for city Furposes, or prevent the
trustees or other school governing body from making changes in
Hon. Compton White, page 5, O-3473

the budgeta for school purposes; and the duties required by
virtue of this Act of atate, County, City and School Officers
or Representatives shall be performed for the compensation now
provided by law to be paid said Officers, respectively.”
Relative to ‘yoursecond question, we held in our opinion No.&
2315, approved June 6, 1940, that the disbetion exercised
by the commissioners’ Court in declaring an emergency for amend-
ing the budget was final and should not be questioned by the
auditor except only where the question is debatable or where
the existence of an emergency is questionable.
According to your letter sufficient funda for holding an
election were set up in the 1941 budget. No importance can be
attached to th.efact that at the time suoh funds were set up
the commissioners’ court of your,county possibly anticipated a
looal option election. Should the court, exercising its
discretion, order said local option election to be held prior
to the forthcoming special senatorial election, the expense of
the first election could not be held an emergency under the
budget law with funds on hand and previously set up therein.
The ‘obligation of such funds is not determined by the priority
of the order calling an election but by the date upon which an
election is first held and expenses incurred therefore
As to your first question, it is the opinion of this .Bepartment
that it is within the discretion of the commissioners! court
to order a local option election to be held on the same date
as that upon which the forthcoming special senatori~alelection is
to be held; provided such election is authorized under the law
and is ordered within a reasonable time after the petition is
presented containing the requisite number of qualified voters.
Should the two elections be so held, the officials generally
appointed to hold a local option election could not at the s&me
time conduct the special senatorial election, the holding of
which in each voting precinct requires the appointment of a
presiding judge, as assistant judge and t,wo clerks by the
commissionerst court.
Answering your second question, it is our opinion that under the
facts presented, the county auditor could not require the com-
missioners’ court to declare an emergency to pay for a local
option election validly held previous to the special senatorial
election called and set for June 28, 1941. However, the com-
missioners' court would be empowered to declare an emergency
and amend the budget so as to provide funds for the second
election.
Hon. Compton White, page 6

                             Yours very truly,
                        ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                        s/ 'i{rn-J.
                                 R, King

                        BY
WnlK:N/cg                    Wm. J. R. King
                                 .Assistant

APPROVED MAY 26, 1941
s/ Grover Sellers
FIRST ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENiEAL

Approved opinion committee
 BY Bm, Chairman