Court Opinion

ID: 2950293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:39:52.076445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:40.547330
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,373-01

                       EX PARTE OWEN PASCAL WILLIS, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 51582-C IN THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM WICHITA COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty-three years’ imprisonment on each count. He did not

appeal his convictions.

        Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to investigate Applicant’s

involvement in the robberies, particularly whether he was held at gunpoint and acted under duress.

Tex. Penal Code § 8.05. The State filed a response, but the trial court failed to make findings of fact
                                                                                                       2

and conclusions of law.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim and describe her investigation of the charges.

The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions

of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial

but for counsel’s allegedly deficient conduct. The trial court shall also make any other findings of

fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s

claim for habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. The plea papers shall also be

forwarded with the supplemental record. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: July 29, 2015
Do not publish