Court Opinion

ID: 9407787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-10 11:06:47.374562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:40.256756
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued July 6, 2023

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                            ————————————
                              NO. 01-22-00960-CR
                           ———————————
                   LANCE TYLER CAMPBELL, Appellant
                                        V.
                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 174th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 1635723

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Lance Tyler Campbell appeals from his conviction by a jury.

Appellant was sentenced to seven years in the Correctional Institutions Division of

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
      During a hearing held on December 20, 2022, appellant’s trial counsel stated

that appellant did not wish to appeal and did not request counsel on appeal.

Appellant’s trial court moved to withdraw and the trial court granted this motion,

leaving appellant pro se. Although a clerk’s record was filed, the court reporter

stated that no appellate record had been requested.

      The Court issued an order on March 21, 2023, abating the appeal and

remanding to the trial court for a hearing to determine if appellant wished to pursue

his appeal, and if so, whether appellant was indigent and entitled to appointment of

counsel and a reporter’s record at no cost to appellant. A supplemental clerk’s

record was filed on April 28, 2023, containing a finding in the trial court’s docket

sheet that appellant appeared at the hearing by zoom and stated that he no longer

wished to pursue his appeal. A hearing record filed on April 21, 2023 contained

appellant’s statement that he does not want to appeal his conviction.

      Appellant has not filed a motion to withdraw the appeal or to dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon appellant’s testimony at

the hearing, appellant does not want to continue his appeal.            Based on this

testimony, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend operation of Rule 42.2(a)

in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2; Jeffery v. State, No. 14-13-00987-CR, 2014

WL 2039981, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 15, 2014, no pet.)

                                         2
(based on appellant’s testimony, court suspended operation of Rule 42.2(a) and

dismissed appeal).

      We dismiss the appeal. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           3