Court Opinion

ID: 8416182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:15:13.520147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:15.920864
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Roy Allen Thomas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Angelone, No. CA-01-783-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.