Court Opinion

ID: 4432228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-22 19:00:22.963702+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:58.156766
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-1269

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00369-REP)

Submitted: August 20, 2019                                        Decided: August 22, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion to amend his

complaint.   We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v.

U.S. Dep’t of Defense, No. 3:18-cv-00369-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2019). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             DISMISSED

                                            2