Court Opinion

ID: 9310456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:38:44.088384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:07.484853
License: Public Domain

By force of the'United States laws the rates of freight between points in the state of Alabama and Cincinnati are fixed and are not the subject of contract. The railroad company can neither charge more nor accept less than the fixed rate. In the present ease the railroad company by mistake accepted less than the fixed rate from the shipper. It supposed it was receiving from the *306shipper the exact amount of the fixed rate and did not attempt to contract to. carry the goods for less than the fixed rate. The railroad company had a lien on the goods for the balance of this freight charge, and the law made it the duty of the company to collect it. Not to do so would in effect amount to a rebate which would violate the statute. The mistake was discovered by the company before it delivered the goods and the Magnus Company were notified that the amount of the error was charged against the goods. The Magnus Company, under an agreement with the railway company, were allowed to receive all freight consigned to them and pay the charges at stated periods, the Magnus Company being on what is known as the credit list. On the facts we think the Magnus Company is liable for the balance due ‘on the frieght the same as if no freight had been paid.
Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.