Court Opinion

ID: 9697357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:14:55.106773+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:32.011908
License: Public Domain

MADDOX, Justice
(dissenting).
I would grant the application for rehearing in view of the issues raised on original submission. However, I concur in the statement of the law expressed in the extended opinion on the res judicata issue.
HARWOOD, J., concurs.
PER CURIAM.
Those members of this Court joining herein, in consultation, express the view that some of the assertions appearing in appellee’s brief filed herein in support of its application for rehearing are impertinent. Such assertions have no place in briefs.
HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, HAR-WOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX. McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.