Court Opinion

ID: 9650938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 15:56:44.827562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:27.590694
License: Public Domain

GRONER, Associate Justice
(concurring).
I concur on the ground that the Nevada court never obtained any jurisdiction of the wife; that her answer filed in the Nevada suit was obtained by the fraud of her husband, and therefore was without effect. German Sav. & Loan Soc. v. Dormitzer, 192 U. S. 125, page 128, 24 S. Ct. 221, 48 L. Ed. 373; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61-65, 25 L. Ed. 93.
But I think the ground of collusion in the Nevada proceeding, on which the opinion is made to rest in part, may not be examined in this cause. United States v. Throckmorton, supra, 98 U. S. 61, at page 65, 25 L. Ed. 93; Lanktree v. Lanktree, 42 Cal. App. 648, 183 P. 954, 955; Holmes v. Holmes, 189 Iowa, 256, 264, 176 N. W. 691; Sudbury v. Sudbury, 179 Iowa, 1039, 162 N. W. 209, 212; Littlefield v. Paynter, 111 Kan. 201, 204, 206 P. 1114.