Court Opinion

ID: 3034922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 22:51:48.105944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:50.449514
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              MAR 12 2010

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ALBERT RICHARDSON,                          No. 08-55201

              Petitioner - Appellant,            D.C. No. CV-04-01193-RGK

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
P.L. VASQUEZ, Warden,

              Respondent - Appellee.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Central District of California
                    R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

                      Argued and Submitted February 11, 2010
                               Pasadena, California

Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, ** Chief
District Judge.

       John Albert Richardson appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. §

2254 habeas petition asserting that his California three strikes sentence of 28 years

        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
       **
             The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the
District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
to life violates the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1291 and 2253 and reverse and remand with instructions to grant the petition.

      We review the district court de novo and the California Court of Appeal’s

decision to determine if it is contrary to, or an unreasonable application of clearly

established Supreme Court law. Gonzalez v. Duncan, 551 F.3d 875, 879 (9th Cir.

2008). We apply clearly established Supreme Court authority existing when the

California Court of Appeal issued its decision in 2004. Lockyer v. Andrade, 538

U.S. 63, 71-72 (2003). The jury found Richardson guilty of failing to register

either a change-of-address or a new second address in violation of Cal. Penal Code

§ 290(a)(1)(A) or (B). A sentence of 28 years to life for a § 290 violation of this

nature is grossly disproportionate to the offense and therefore, runs afoul of the

Eighth Amendment. See Gonzalez, 551 F.3d at 877.

      REVERSED AND REMANDED.

                                           2