Court Opinion

ID: 8503410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 01:24:53.212005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:50:46.941757
License: Public Domain

By the court,

The motion, which the defendant has made ⅛ this case, cannot prevail. The exemption of the defend-¿.nt’s body in Massachusetts was. local, and cannot be regarded: here. 14 Johnson 346, Peck vs. Hozier.-2 do. 193, Smith vs. Spinola.—7 do. 117, White vs. Canfield.—1 D. & E 470, Maule vs. Murray.—1 Dallas 188, James vs. Allen.—2 East 453.—1 Caine’s Rep. 402.—3 Johnson 263.—11 do. 194,—1 Bos. & Puller 138, Melan vs. Fitzjames.-—5 Mass. Rep. 509.—10 do. 337.

Motion overruled,