Court Opinion

ID: 2750608
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-12 20:20:34.020941+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:35:20.802873
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                             November 12, 2014
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
AUDRA GRAHAM,                                                                 OF WEST VIRGINIA

WIDOW OF BOBBY GRAHAM,
Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 13-1059	 (BOR Appeal No. 2048253)
                   (Claim No. 840069331)

WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Below, Respondent

and

APOGEE COAL COMPANY,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
      Petitioner Audra Graham, pro se, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’
Compensation Board of Review. The West Virginia Office of the Insurance Commissioner, by
Noah Barnes, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated September 23, 2013, in
which the Board affirmed a March 6, 2013, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s January 6, 2011,
decision denying Ms. Graham’s request for dependent’s benefits. The Court has carefully
reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is
mature for consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.
                                                1
         Ms. Graham filed a claim for dependent’s benefits following the August 21, 2005, death
of her husband, Bobby. Prior to his death the decedent underwent treatment for small cell
carcinoma of the lung, which eventually metastasized to his brain. A death summary issued on
August 21, 2005, indicated that the decedent’s final diagnoses were uncontrolled pain, anemia,
shortness of breath, small cell lung carcinoma, and brain metastasis. The decedent’s death
certificate lists the immediate cause of death as cancer of the lung with a reoccurrence and lists
the secondary causes of death as brain metastasis, status-post chemotherapy, and malnutrition.
An autopsy of the lungs was performed and a report was issued on September 8, 2005. The
autopsy report noted the presence of small cell carcinoma in the right main bronchus, with spread
to the right upper and middle lobes and metastases to the hilar lymph nodes and left lower lobe; a
right hydrothorax; pleural adhesions; panacinar emphysema; and mild anthracosis with no coal
nodules present on microscopic examination. On December 16, 2010, the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board concluded that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially
contribute to the decedent’s death. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board noted that the
decedent had received a lifetime award of 5% for occupational pneumoconiosis, and determined
that x-rays obtained on December 2, 1988, although initially interpreted as positive for the
presence of occupational pneumoconiosis, revealed minimal changes at best. On January 6,
2011, the claims administrator denied Ms. Graham’s application for dependent’s benefits.

        At a hearing on January 9, 2013, the members of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis
Board testified that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to the decedent’s
death. Jack Kinder, M.D., testified on behalf of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board that
there are numerous reports in the evidentiary record identifying the decedent’s main cause of
death as carcinoma of the lung, and opined that metastasis to the decedent’s central nervous
system was the ultimate cause of his death. Dr. Kinder further testified that because coal nodules
were not identified during the autopsy, the autopsy did not uncover evidence of coal worker’s
pneumoconiosis and the decedent’s death therefore cannot be attributed to coal dust exposure.
Finally, Dr. Kinder testified that the autopsy report, death summary, and death certificate all
support the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s conclusion that occupational pneumoconiosis
did not materially contribute to the decedent’s death.

       In its Order affirming the January 6, 2011, claims administrator’s decision, the Office of
Judges held that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to the decedent’s
death. On appeal, Ms. Graham requests an award of dependent’s benefits.

       In Bradford v. Workers’ Compensation Comm’r, Syl. Pt. 3, 185 W.Va. 434, 408 S.E.2d
13 (1991), this Court held that in order to establish entitlement to dependent’s benefits, a
claimant must show that an occupational disease or injury “contributed in any material degree to
the death.” The Office of Judges found that the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s
conclusion that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to the decedent’s
death is credible. In particular, the Office of Judges took note of the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board’s finding that numerous reports list carcinoma of the lung as the
immediate cause of death, and further noted the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s finding
that metastasis to the decedent’s brain ultimately caused his death. Finally, the Office of Judges
                                                2
relied on the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s conclusion that an autopsy did not produce
evidence of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis but did confirm the presence of small cell lung
carcinoma. The Board of Review reached the same reasoned conclusions in its decision of
September 23, 2013. We agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review. The
evidence of record does not support a finding that occupational pneumoconiosis materially
contributed to the decedent’s death.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: November 12, 2014

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

                                                3