Court Opinion

ID: 4684208
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-05 19:11:01.972045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:37.719845
License: Public Domain

People v Natal (2021 NY Slip Op 02828)

People v Natal

2021 NY Slip Op 02828

Decided on May 5, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 5, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-07869

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRaymond Natal, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 164/18)

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky and Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Stephen J. Rooney, J.), imposed May 24, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court