Court Opinion

ID: 5455984
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:19:30.173436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:39.510522
License: Public Domain

Davies, J.
In this case the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals, and by an order made in that court on the 28th of September, 1858, the said appeal was dismissed with costs. That order or judgment has been made the judgment of this-court, with the further order that the defendant have execution for his costs when taxed by the clerk.
Upon this state of facts the clerk has adjusted the costs at $28.78, being $25 as allowed for costs on appeal to the Court of Appeals before argument, and $3.78 for disbursements. A motion is now made to correct this adjustment. The case in 2 Sandf., 741, which seems to have been well considered, holds,, that in a case where the appeal is dismissed, the respondent is entitled to $25 and disbursements. The court say he is entitled to that or nothing. So in this case, the Court of Appeals have said that the appeal is dismissed with costs; and when we turn to the Code to see what costs, we find it to be $25 (§ 307). If the Court of Appeals had intended to fix the costs at $10, it should have said so. This court has. no authority to alter, or in any-*261respect modify the judgment of that court. Having allowed uosts, we can see no other costs can be meant than those given hy section 307 of the Code.
The motion for readjustment is denied, with §7 costs.