Court Opinion

ID: 8253344
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 11:16:22.745676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:56.293652
License: Public Domain

By order of December 14, 2018, the defendant's appellate counsel was directed to file a supplemental brief. On order of the Court, the brief having been received, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the defendant's June 22, 2017 application for leave to appeal under the standard applicable to direct appeals. Appellate counsel admits that she missed the deadline for filing a direct appeal. Accordingly, the defendant was deprived of his direct appeal as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel. See Roe v. Flores-Ortega , 528 U.S. 470, 477, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000) ; Peguero v. United States , 526 U.S. 23, 28, 119 S.Ct. 961, 143 L.Ed.2d 18 (1999).
We do not retain jurisdiction.