Court Opinion

ID: 9958085
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-07 07:13:31.261123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:45.387162
License: Public Domain

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2024.

                                        In The

                      Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                                NO. 14-24-00034-CR

                           BETTY RUNYON, Appellant

                                           V.
                        THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                     On Appeal from the 424th District Court
                             Burnet County, Texas
                          Trial Court Cause No. 54748

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, less than
one gram, and sentenced to five years’ incarceration on November 16, 2023. No
timely motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was
due by December 16, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

      A court of appeals may grant an extension of time if, within 15 days after the
deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files (a) the notice of appeal in the
trial court, and (b) a motion for extension of time in the court of appeals. See Tex.
R. App. P. 26.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2) (governing motion for
extension of time to file notice of appeal). The fifteenth day after December 16,
2023 was December 31, 2023.

      Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was dated by hand on December 20,
2023 and filed December 27, 2023, within 15 days of the due date. Appellant,
however, did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

      A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). When a notice of
appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the 15-day period, the
court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. See id

      On February 28, 2024, the parties were notified that the appeal would be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has
jurisdiction. No response has been received.

      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                          2