Court Opinion

ID: 9764212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 03:15:04.513249+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:30.373531
License: Public Domain

*665BLEIL, Justice,
concurring.
I agree that the summary judgment should be reversed and the case remanded for trial.
I agree with Chief Justice Cornelius that the summary judgment evidence tending to show that the property’s value is far greater than $28,000.00 at least raises an inference that the property’s fair cash market value was grossly in excess of $28,000.00. This raises the fact question of whether the property was sold for a grossly inadequate price at the foreclosure sale. To my knowledge, no “venerable principle of the law of evidence” alters this conclusion. At the time of trial questions of what evidence is or is not admissible may be presented to the trial court.