Court Opinion

ID: 9866530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 13:10:59.978715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:57.950197
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                       San Antonio, Texas

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                           No. 04-23-00762-CV

                 IN RE Colby Jay THIENPONT and Cheryl M. Broussard, Relators

                                           Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:         Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                 Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 20, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On August 17, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an

extraordinary remedy, available only when relators can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its

discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal.

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relators did not show they are entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

                                                       PER CURIAM

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022-CI-23588, styled Sheridan Marie Santens v. Colby Jay Thienpont and
Cheryl M. Broussard, pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie
Alvarado presiding.