Court Opinion

ID: 8447619
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:31:01.650687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.465391
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jessie William Newton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Newton, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-18 (W.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.