Court Opinion

ID: 9517243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:11:06.709861+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:00.867270
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER

PER CURIAM.
In its Motion for Rehearing, Mihlfeld states that “this Court holds that the permanent injunction entered by the trial court should have been limited to the three year time period agreed to in the employment agreement, and that the restrictive covenant expired March 20, 2009.” Such characterization reads the holding too broadly. As stated in the opinion, Rootes challenged only the non-solicitation time period in the permanent injunction as violating the three-year period as agreed by the parties in the employment agreement. This Court found merit in that challenge, reversed that portion of the judgment granting a permanent injunction, and remanded the cause to the trial court “with directions to enter an injunction with a temporal limit consistent with the restriction in the employment agreement.” Because this Court considered and ruled upon only a challenge to the time period of the non-solicitation provision in the permanent injunction, our holding is so limited.
Mihlfeld’s Motion for Rehearing and Application for Transfer to Supreme Court are denied.