Court Opinion

ID: 3967121
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:26:31.10352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:19:39.986571
License: Public Domain

The appeal was dismissed at a former term, but later reinstated. The case is now considered on its merits.
Operating under a search warrant, officers discovered a large quantity of whisky in a house occupied by appellant.
Appellant interposed objection to the testimony of the officers touching the result of the search on the ground that the place searched was the private residence of appellant and that the affidavit for the search warrant was made by only one person. The bills of exception attacking the affidavit and admission of the testimony touching the result of the search fail to set out the affidavit in substance or in detail. It is stated, as a ground of objection, that the affidavit was made by one person and that the place searched was appellant's private residence. A mere statement of a ground of objection in a bill of exception is not a certificate of the judge that the facts which form the basis of the objection are true; it merely shows that such an objection was made. Branch's Annotated Penal Code, Section 209; Jenkins v. State, 24 S.W.2d 1092; Fisher v. State, 1 S.W.2d 301; Buchanan v. State, 298 S.W. 569; Coleman v. State, 10 S.W.2d 559. This court must indulge the legal presumption that the ruling of the trial court was correct, unless the bill of exception shows otherwise. Buchanan v. State, supra.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
                    ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.