Court Opinion

ID: 1011433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:27:43.625787+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:40.181003
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6495

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ADOLFO VALDEZ,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-9-7-F)

Submitted:   August 28, 2003             Decided:   September 4, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adolfo Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Adolfo Valdez seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis filed under 28

U.S.C. § 1651 (2000).     We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s order and find no reversible error.            A writ of error coram

nobis is available only when the petitioner is not in custody. See,

e.g., United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31, 37 (1st Cir. 2001).

Because Valdez is in federal custody and has filed a prior motion

under   28   U.S.C.   §   2255   (2000),    he   may   not   circumvent   the

gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 ¶ 8 and 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000),

by filing a petition under § 1651.          United States v. Noske, 235

F.3d 405, 406 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order denying relief.            We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                     2