Court Opinion

ID: 1010495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:12:31.2232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:24.736285
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Richard S. Fowler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Fowler,
  
  No. CR-94-216 (D.Md. Oct. 22, 2002). We grant the motion to file an addendum to the informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.