Court Opinion

ID: 9376750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-03 19:00:41.646147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:08.936793
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40620         Document: 00516665059             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/03/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-40620
                                                                             FILED
                                     Summary Calendar                    March 3, 2023
                                     ____________
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                 Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Max Majors,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Eastern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:19-CR-21-4
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Max Majors has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Majors has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40620     Document: 00516665059         Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/03/2023

                                  No. 22-40620

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
         However, there is a clerical error in the written judgment.       In
   accordance with the written plea agreement, the Government moved to
   dismiss count four of the indictment. The district court orally granted the
   motion, but the amended judgment does not reflect the dismissal.
   Accordingly, we REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical
   error in the written judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

                                           2