Court Opinion

ID: 4378295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-19 13:00:26.946792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:19:27.122651
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-10358   Date Filed: 03/19/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-10358
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00019–RH-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

WILLIAM STANLEY, JR.,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (March 19, 2019)

Before MARCUS, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-10358    Date Filed: 03/19/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Robert Harper III, appointed counsel for William Stanley, Jr. in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Stanley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2