Court Opinion

ID: 3805539
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:46:17.448936+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:17.779306
License: Public Domain

We have carefully considered the petition for rehearing in the above cause in view of the allegation of conflict with the case of Newland v. Hatten, 92 Okla. 207, 218 P. 822, We are of the opinion that there is no conflict with the principles laid down in said case, and we adhere to the advisory opinion heretofore adopted, and the petition for rehearing is denied.
McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. PHELPS, J., absent.