Court Opinion

ID: 9350615
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-27 21:02:13.539308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:40.215968
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                          Dec 27, 2022
                                                                                          02:27 PM(CT)
                                                                                        TENNESSEE COURT OF
                                                                                       WORKERS' COMPENSATION
                                                                                              CLAIMS

               TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
              IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                                 AT GRAY

    SALVADOR ENRIQUEZ,                                ) Docket No. 2020-02-0318
            Employee,                                 )
    v.                                                )
    DEFENDER SERVICES, INC.,                          )
            Employer,                                 ) State File No. 1013152019
    And                                               )
    AMERICAN CASUALTY                                 )
    COMPANY OF READING,                               )
    PENNSYLVANIA,                                     ) Judge Brian K. Addington
            Carrier.                                  )

                                 EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

        The Court held an expedited hearing on December 15, 2022, on whether Mr.
Enriquez is entitled to past temporary disability benefits. Defender argued that Mr.
Enriquez does not qualify for these benefits because the treating physician placed him at
maximum medical improvement on June 9, 2020. For the reasons below, Mr. Enriquez is
entitled to the requested benefits.

                                            History of Claim

        On December 19, 2019, Mr. Enriquez injured his left knee when he fell at work.
Defender authorized Dr. Larry Waldrop to surgically repair Mr. Enriquez’s knee ligament.
On June 9, 2020, Dr. Waldrop placed him at maximum medical improvement, but he noted
he would likely require knee replacement surgery in the future and assigned light-duty
restrictions.1

      Mr. Enriquez had further symptoms, and on July 14, he saw Dr. Waldrop for
worsening pain. That day he ordered an MRI and removed Mr. Enriquez from work. On
November 11, Dr. Waldrop reviewed the MRI results and modified the restrictions to light

1
    Defender paid Mr. Enriquez $584.15 in weekly temporary benefits until that date.

                                                      1
duty-lifting no more than five pounds. Mr. Enriquez’s knee pain continued over the next
several months despite multiple injections.

       Dr. Waldrop completely removed Mr. Enriquez from work on July 19, 2022, and
Defender restarted temporary total disability benefits. Dr. Waldrop performed a court-
ordered left-knee replacement for Mr. Enriquez in August. Mr. Enriquez testified that he
experienced less pain and could ambulate better after his knee replacement.

       On September 1, Dr. Waldrop responded to a questionnaire, marking “no” to the
question, “was Mr. Enriquez at Maximum Medical Improvement on June 21, 2020.” Dr.
Waldrop answered “yes” when asked if Mr. Enriquez was restricted to light duty from
November 11, 2020, until July 19, 2022.

        Mr. Enriquez testified that he attempted three times to find work within his
restrictions. He said that he has not worked since June 20, 2020, because of his knee pain
and restrictions. At the hearing, he called two local employers, who testified that Mr.
Enriquez requested a construction job from them; however, neither had available work
within his restrictions. Mr. Enriquez recounted that he tried operating a string trimmer but
could not physically do it.2

       Based on Dr. Waldrop’s September 1 opinion, Mr. Enriquez asked for an accrued
award of temporary disability benefits from June 9, 2020, to July 18, 2022. This represents
temporary partial benefits for June 9, 2020, through July 13; temporary total benefits for
July 14 through November 11; and temporary partial benefits beginning November 12,
2020, through July 18, 2022.

        Defender argued that it did not owe temporary benefits because Mr. Enriquez
reached maximum medical improvement and was released to light-duty work in June 2020.
It further asserted that Mr. Enriquez has not proven his period of disability, nor that he was
unable to work light duty. Lastly, it argued that receiving treatment after the authorized
physician placed him at maximum medical improvement did not rescind that status.

                           Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

       At an Expedited hearing, Mr. Enriquez must show he would likely prevail at a
hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2022). The only issue is whether
Mr. Enriquez was entitled to temporary disability benefits.3

2
 The parties did not introduce evidence of what, if any, work Mr. Enriquez could perform for Defender.
3
 During the second expedited hearing, the undersigned held that Mr. Enriquez came forward with sufficient
evidence to show he was likely to succeed at a final hearing in showing the need for his total knee
replacement was primarily due to his December 19, 2019 injury.

                                                   2
       To be eligible for temporary benefits, Mr. Enriquez must prove: “(1) that he became
disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) that there is a causal connection
between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of
disability.” Hibbitts v. Kim Royal d/b/a Royal Guttering, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
LEXIS 10, at *6 (Mar. 23, 2021).

       In a previous expedited hearing, the Court found Mr. Enriquez’s condition primarily
related to his work injury. Further, Dr. Waldrop never released Mr. Enriquez, and his status
has remained at sedentary or no work during the period of disability in question.
Additionally, Mr. Enriquez offered testimony of two local employers who stated they did
not have construction positions to accommodate his restrictions.

       As to Defender’s assertion that he worked during the alleged period of disability,
Mr. Enriquez testified that he attempted to perform minor yard and construction work but
was unable to do so, and Defender presented no proof that Mr. Enriquez earned any income
during the period in question. The Court finds that these unsuccessful attempts to work
bolster Dr. Waldrop’s opinion concerning the work restrictions. Mr. Enriquez should not
be penalized for attempting to find work.

       Additionally, the Court rejects Defender’s argument that Mr. Enriquez was at
maximum medical improvement. Although Dr. Waldrop initially documented maximum
medical improvement and rated Mr. Enriquez’s injury, he removed Mr. Enriquez from
work less than one month later. Further, the parties were in active dispute over the knee
replacement surgery, which the Court eventually ordered. With Mr. Enriquez’s continued
treatment, knee replacement, and Dr. Waldrop’s new September 1, 2022, opinion, the
Court holds that Mr. Enriquez had not reached maximum medical improvement in June
2020.

       Considering the findings above, the Court holds that Mr. Enriquez is likely to prevail
at a hearing on the merits in showing his entitlement to the temporary benefits he seeks.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

   1. Defender shall pay Mr. Enriquez temporary partial disability benefits from June 9,
      2020, through July 13, which represents five weeks at the weekly rate of $584.15
      totaling $2,920.75.

   2. Defender shall pay Mr. Enriquez temporary total disability benefits from July 14,
      2020, through November 11, or seventeen weeks and four days at the weekly rate
      of $584.15 totaling $10,097.54.

                                             3
   3. Defender shall pay Mr. Enriquez temporary partial disability for the period of
      November 12, 2020, to July 18, 2022, at the weekly rate of $584.15 totaling eighty-
      six weeks and three days or $50,487.25

   4. Mr. Beiger is entitled to a fee of up to 20% from Mr. Enriquez from the total amount
      ordered.

   5. This case is set for a Status Hearing on February 14, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern
      time. The parties must dial 855-543-5044 to participate in the hearing.

   6. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
      with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
      of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The
      insurer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by
      email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day
      after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the
      period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For
      questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation
      Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

      ENTERED December 27, 2022.

                                           /s/ Brian K. Addington
                                         ______________________________________
                                         BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE
                                         Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

                                      APPENDIX

Exhibits:
   1. Affidavit of Salvador Enriquez
   2. Wage Statement
   3. Affidavit of Employer
   4. Employment Record
   5. Designated Medical Records
   6. Medical Records-Appalachian Orthopaedics (9/6/2022-11/15/2022)
   7. Medical Records- Physical Therapy Services, PA
   8. Dr. William Hovis IME, Medical Records and Correspondence
   9. Dr. William Hovis Deposition Transcript
   10. Transcript of Expedited Hearing (June 30, 2021)

                                            4
 11. Transcript of Expedited Hearing (March 31, 2022)
 12. Deposition Transcript of Dr. Larry Waldrop
 13. Social Security Card (for identification only)
 14. California ID (for identification only)

 Technical Record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice (2/26/2021)
    3. Dispute Certification Notice (10/8/2022)
    4. Expedited Hearing Order (4/12/2022)
    5. Expedited Hearing Order (7/7/2021)
    6. Employee’s Position Statement (7/25/2022)
    7. Hearing Request
    8. Defendant’s Expedited Hearing Brief
    9. Claimant’s Brief in Support
    10. Claimant Salvador Enriquez’s Exhibit List for the Expedited Hearing
    11. Claimant Salvador Enriquez’s Witness List for the Expedited Hearing

                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I certify that a copy of the Order was sent on December 27, 2022.

         Name             Certified    Fax    Email Service sent to:
                           Mail
Daniel Bieger,                                  X       dan@biegerlaw.com
Employee’s Attorney                                     paige@biegerlaw.com
J. Brent Moore,                                 X       bmoore@ortalekelley.com
Employer’s Attorney                                     ccaruso@ortalekelley.com

                                      ______________________________________
                                      PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
                                      wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

                                         5
                           Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

     If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

   1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
      Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the
      date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
      serve a copy upon all parties.

   2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
      calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
      any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
      alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
      website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
      completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
      result in dismissal of the appeal.

   3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
      from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
      the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
      it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
      parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
      the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
      Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
      Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
      concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
      a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

   4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
      business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
      party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
      days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
      statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
      expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
      the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
      argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
                                              NOTICE OF APPEAL
                                      Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
                                        www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
                                        wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

                                                                                  Docket No.: ________________________

                                                                                  State File No.: ______________________

                                                                                  Date of Injury: _____________________

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employee

         v.

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
                         [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties
Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
Email: __________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                           * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
Email: _________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                              * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

                                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

                                                           ______________________________________________
                                                            [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082