Court Opinion

ID: 6026657
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:24:49.395873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:02.821567
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered September 19, 1996, convicting him of menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.