Court Opinion

ID: 799390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-05-07 17:10:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:59:49.018709
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  In this nearly fourteen-year-old case— which has now been appealed, in one context or another, to this court on four occa
  
   sions
  
  — we affirm the district court’s ruling that this action is barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel and that none of the reasons to the contrary asserted by the appellant provide a substantial basis to undermine that holding.
 

  Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.