Court Opinion

ID: 7675122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 02:59:09.019733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:26.170586
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
There was no error in the trial court’s determination that its previous award of attorney’s fees in this matrimonial action was based on the wife’s needs and was therefore a debt in the nature of support which was not discharged by the husband’s bankruptcy. In *1247re Spong, 661 F.2d 6 (2d Cir.1981); In re Friedland, 18 B.R. 451, 453 (S.D.Fla.1982); Matter of Vazquez, 92 B.R. 533, 535 (S.D.Fla. 1988); cf. Scharmen v. Scharmen, 613 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Affirmed.