Court Opinion

ID: 1003949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:34:05.802734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:29.486897
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Edward Otis Rutland appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have re
   
   *202
   
  viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Rutland,
  
  No. CR-91-132 (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.