Court Opinion

ID: 813735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-12-17 18:22:11+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:49.689770
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-20837       Document: 00512085451         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/17/2012

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        December 17, 2012
                                     No. 11-20837
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EPIFANIO NINO NINO, also known as Epifanio Nino, also known as Epifanio
Nino Nino Nino, also known as Pual Romero, also known as Epifanio Nino-Nino,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-434-1

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Epifanio Nino Nino
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Nino has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Nino’s response. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 11-20837   Document: 00512085451    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/17/2012

                               No. 11-20837

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2