Court Opinion

ID: 2776260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-04 08:09:45.993279+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:28.140798
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                            ____________________
                               NO. 09-15-00028-CR
                            ____________________

                        IN RE ALBERT F. HAARMANN

_______________________________________________________             ______________

                                Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________             _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Albert F. Haarmann filed an original and amended petition for writ of

mandamus, asking this Court to order his trial counsel to give Haarmann his case

file in Cause Number 8843 in the 411th District Court of San Jacinto County. 1

Neither petition invoke this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code

Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (A court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus

against a judge of a district or county court in the court’s district, or issue a writ

      1
       Cause Number 8843 was affirmed on appeal and the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals subsequently denied Haarmann’s petition for writ of habeas
corpus. See Ex parte Haarmann, No. WR-74213-01, 2010 WL 3430873, at *1
(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010) (order, not designated for publication).
                                          1
that is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.). Accordingly, we dismiss

the petition for writ of mandamus.

      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                                         PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 3, 2015
Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                         2