Court Opinion

ID: 2868721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 02:28:05.619313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:30.086189
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00548-CR

Bradley Doan, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. B-03-0150-S, HONORABLE BARBARA ANN L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant Bradley Doan pleaded guilty to an indictment accusing him of sexual
assault.  See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.011 (West Supp. 2004).  The district court adjudged him
guilty and imposed a fifteen-year prison sentence.
Doan's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d
807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.
State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.
1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Doan, who was advised of his right to examine
the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton
Affirmed
Filed:   March 4, 2004
Do Not Publish