Court Opinion

ID: 6852944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:38:31.463703+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:06.480423
License: Public Domain

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I am compelled to dissent in this ease, because I believe that, under its special facts, it is controlled by Lynch v. Turrish, 247 U. S. 221, 230, 38 S. Ct. 537, 62 L. Ed. 1087. I do not think that the facts in the case of Edwards v. Douglas et al., 269 U. S. 204, 46 S. Ct. 85, 70 L. Ed. 235, relied upon by the government, are sufficiently similar to those at bar to make that ease determinative here.