Court Opinion

ID: 9512580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:16:43.731821+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:26.240143
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE RICE,
concurring.
¶49 I concur on all issues. Under Issue 1,1 would note that possession of firearm accessories has been charged, in conjunction with possession of firearms, as a violation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l). See United States v. Twenty-Eight Firearms, Assorted Firearm Ammunition, and Firearm Accessories, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88953 at *1, *5 (M. D. Term. Oct. 31, 2008). Here, the State made no argument opposing Fadness’ separate request for return of the accessories, and thus I agree with the Court’s resolution of the issue upon the authorities cited.