Court Opinion

ID: 8465519
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:08:47.609152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.993933
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Abernathy, No. 8:08-cv-00517-HMH, 2009 WL 799652 (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.