Court Opinion

ID: 9467491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 01:50:15.831089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:40:22.620676
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing
In its rehearing petition, the Union expressed uncertainty regarding the effect of the court’s decision in this case, particularly whether the decision permits further arbitration pursuant to the Warns’ award, or whether any future arbitration regarding the VDT system must begin anew. This court clearly invalidated both Parts 2 and 3 of the Warns’ award. Thus, the Warns’ award contains no valid bargaining directive which would require bargaining or further arbitration pursuant to that particular award.
On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed in the above-entitled cause by Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23, plaintiff-appellee, a majority1 of judges have voted to deny rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny a rehearing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

. Chief Judge Fairchild and Judges Swygert and Cudahy would have granted the en banc rehearing request.