Court Opinion

ID: 6619883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:28:24.754818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:58:40.038652
License: Public Domain

ELLISON, J.
This action was brought against defendants as receivers of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Ee Railroad for killing a cow belonging to plaintiff. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court. The case was here on a former appeal (72 Mo. App. 243).
Defendants were appointed receivers by the federal court for the western district of Missouri, and at the last trial they set up their discharge as such receivers and claimed that the case should abate as to them. The trial court ruled the point' adversely and this is the principal error assigned.
In our opinion, the discharge of the receivers by the federal court ends the case as to them and unless some other party, or parties, defendant are brought in, the case should be dismissed. The receivers are only liable for the damage alleged, in their official capacity and the judgment rendered would necessarily be paid from the funds in their hands as such *348officials. If they have been, discharged ■without reservation, it follows that they are not any longer proper defendants. Brown v. Gay, 76 Texas 444; Telegraph Co. v. Jewett, 115 N. Y. 166; Bond v. State, 68. Miss. 648; Fordyce v. DuBose, 87 Texas 78; Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Railway, 7 Fed. Rep. 537. In Ryan v. Hays, 62 Texas 42, it is said that:
“The sole liability of a receiver, except in cases in which he is personally at fault, is official; and when his official character ceases, and the property, through which alone his official liability may be discharged has passed from his hands, and he has been by that court discharged from his trust, then no judgment can be rendered against him; for with the termination of his official existence ends his official liability.”
It appears that the receivers were discharged without reserve. If they had been discharged yet with jurisdiction retained over them and the funds and properties in their hands until all pending controversies were settled, it would have presented a different question.
We will not undertake to say, in advance, what proceeding should be taken by plaintiff. The supreme court of Texas has repeatedly held that damages, such as suffered by plaintiff,were payable out of the current earnings of the railroad while operated by the receiver and that if these earnings had been used in betterments upon the property, the corporations receiving the property back from the receiver was liable after the discharge of the receiver. Texas Pac. Ry. v. Johnson, 76 Texas 421; Boggs v. Brown, 82 Texas 41; Texas Pac. Ry. v. Comstock, 83 Texas 537. Conceding, without deciding, that a liability exists against the railway company in this case we see no difficulty in filing an amended petition making such company a party defendant and setting up the facts of the case as they have developed.
The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
All .concur.