Court Opinion

ID: 7534583
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:16:22.837261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:45.502795
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the personal representative an extension to file an objection to the claim, “even though the statutory time limit [had] expired prior to the filing of the motion for extension.” In re Estate of Sale, 227 So.2d 199, 201 (Fla.1969); see also In re Estate of Oxford, 372 So.2d 1129, 1132 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.