Court Opinion

ID: 9592594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:15:33.558561+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:11.594156
License: Public Domain

GARTZKE, P.J.
{concurring). The commission concluded on the facts of this case that the district's *396Unilateral change in its employee health plan violated the status quo because employees must now sue their employers for redress of allegedly improper benefit denials. I do not read the commission's decision to turn on the effect of § 893.80, STATS.
For us to pursue an unnecessary examination of § 893.80, STATS., permits a nonmunicipal employer in a future case otherwise on all fours to argue that the majority decision applies only to municipalities. No reason exists for us to license that potential argument.