Court Opinion

ID: 993132
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:02:57.993796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:22.645353
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6888

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

SHERRELL GARY BRINKLEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-131-P, CA-97-242-3-P)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997       Decided:   September 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherrell Gary Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.    Brian Lee Whisler,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997),

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Brinkley, Nos. CR-91-131-P; CA-97-242-3-P (W.D.N.C. Apr.

30 and May 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2