Court Opinion

ID: 3088720
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:34:31.827651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:36.606101
License: Public Domain

Jf ourtlj Court of
                                           Antonio,

                                         October 27,2014

                                       No. 04-14-00151-CV

                  Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr.,
                                            Appellants

                                                v.

                             Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse,
                                             Appellees

                                  Trial Court Case No. 10-627-CCL

                                         ORDER

       The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral
argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the
cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on December 9, 2014, to the following panel:
Justice Angelini, Justice Marion, and Justice Barnard. All parties will be notified of the Court's
decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

       Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that
oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues
presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)
days from the date of this order.

       It is so ORDERED on October 27, 2014.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said
court on this October 27. 2014.