Court Opinion

ID: 2820527
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-27 19:02:38.098447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:53.982393
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 15-1509

TOD JACK,

                       Plaintiff – Appellant,

            v.

JESSE PANUCCIO, Executive Director, Reemployment Assistance
Program,

                       Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge.
(2:15-cv-00102-MSD-LRL)

Submitted:   July 23, 2015                  Decided:   July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tod Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

     Tod Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012) his complaint.                We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.               Jack v.

Panuccio, 2:15-cv-00102-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. filed on Apr. 16 &

entered on Apr. 17, 2015).     We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before   this   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                    2