Court Opinion

ID: 4581631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-10-29 04:06:20.458487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:45:15.388311
License: Public Domain

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  October 28, 2020                                                                                  Bridget M. McCormack,
                                                                                                                   Chief Justice

  160460 & (15)                                                                                           David F. Viviano,
                                                                                                          Chief Justice Pro Tem

                                                                                                        Stephen J. Markman
                                                                                                             Brian K. Zahra
  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Richard H. Bernstein
            Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Elizabeth T. Clement
                                                                                                       Megan K. Cavanagh,
                                                                                                                        Justices
  v                                                                 SC: 160460
                                                                    COA: 349804
                                                                    Wayne CC: 13-000288-FC
  SHAQUILLE JOEL SHERMAN,
           Defendant-Appellant.

  _________________________________________/

         By order of April 3, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the
  application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On
  order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is
  again considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden
  of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is
  DENIED.

                           I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           October 28, 2020
         p1021
                                                                               Clerk