Court Opinion

ID: 9825037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 11:57:55.431548+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:21.425230
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The appellee insists, among other things, that the value of the property covered by the Allgood mortgage which appellant has received should be taken into account by the register in appbrtioning the claim for rent ratably on the funds and property covered by the lien. We are of opinion that this contention should be granted, and the decree of reference is therefore modified, in this respect, and the register is ordered to ascertain the amount of rent due and owing to apx>el-lee; that the register also ascertain the value of the property received or taken over by appellee from said Edwards, and which was covered by the lien for rent, and also ascertain the amount of money received by appellant from the sale of the fixtures and other property, and which was covered by her mortr gage and the rent lien, and apportion the rent against the funds of each of said two named parties ratably, and to that and each of said two funds and property is charged ratably with the payment of said rent claim; that the ■ entire amount due for rent is charged against all the property taken over by or decreed to the said appellant and appellee; and the interest of each of said parties in said funds must contribute ratably to the payment thereof as above directed.
.■ The application is otherwise overruled.
ANDERSON, C. J.,' and THOMAS, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.