Court Opinion

ID: 3644888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:01:22.57242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:06.191096
License: Public Domain

Plaintiffs alleged that defendant had agreed, in consideration of the conveyance to him by the plaintiffs of their equity of redemption in described lands, to pay off the mortgage debt thereon and hold the lands subject to their option to repurchase upon repayment to him of the debt, interest, and taxes, within three years; and plaintiffs further alleged that within the time limited, plaintiffs had tendered the amount to the defendant who refused to convey. Defendant in his answer admitted that he made an agreement substantially as alleged, but specifically denied that any tender of repayment of the debt and interest was made to him within the time limited or at any time.
The court, upon consideration of the pleadings and "upon the admissions of the parties," found as a fact that within two years the money advanced by defendant to pay off the mortgage, interest, and taxes, was tendered to the defendant, and thereupon adjudged that equity raised a constructive trust, and that defendant held the land as trustee for the plaintiffs, and directed that he reconvey said lands to them upon the payment of the amounts advanced by him.
Defendant appealed.
The record does not disclose what admissions, if any, were made at the hearing in the court below, and there being no waiver of jury trial or agreement as to facts nor evidence offered, the court was without power to decide a controverted issue of fact raised by the *Page 391 
pleadings. Doubtless the effort to end an unseemly controversy between members of the same family led the learned judge into error.
The case must be remanded for the proper determination of the material issues.
Error and remanded.