Court Opinion

ID: 4327012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-02 00:00:19.052525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:47:12.630124
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-10343      Document: 00514707674         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/01/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-10343
                                                                                FILED
                                                                         November 1, 2018
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELVA NOEMI SALGADO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:17-CR-71-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Elva Noemi Salgado has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Salgado has filed a response.          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Salgado’s response.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-10343    Document: 00514707674    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/01/2018

                                No. 18-10343

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2