Court Opinion

ID: 8298390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 11:09:47.22183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:11.143564
License: Public Domain

LurtoN, J.
Complainants claim title to an undivided one-twenty-fourth interest in a tract of land in Polk County under a deed made by A. P. Caldwell to their ancestor, Julius Raht. A. P. Caldwell claimed title as an heir at law of John Caldwell, who died intestaté, leaving eight children, one of whom was the vendor.
John Caldwell died October 20, 1869, and ■ at the time of his death was the owner of an undivided one-third interest in this Polk County land. October 20, 1876, just seven years after the death of John Caldwell, his son, A. P. Caldwell, sold and conveyed to Julius Raht, for the recited consideration of one thousand dollars, his one-eighth interest as one of his father’s heirs in this Polk County land. In March, 1877, being after this alienation by the heir, a bill was filed in the Chancery Court of Polk County against all of the heirs of "John Caldwell, including A. P. Caldwell, by creditors of the intestate, who had in 1872 recovered judgments against the administrator, to sell the undivided interest of the intestate to pay debts of the estate. The deed from A. P. Caldwell to Julius Raht had been theretofore duly recorded, but this alienation of the share of one of the heirs of the intestate was ignored, and Julius Raht was not made a party to this creditor’s bill. Under *276this bill such proceedings were had as resulted, in 1882, in a sale of the entire one-third interest of the intestate, including the one-eighth share of A. P. Caldwell therein. At this sale Defendant Meek became the purchaser. Although this proceeding to reach the land of the heirs to satisfy debts of the ancestor was begun more than seven years after descent cast, yet it was in time, having been begun within seven' years after judgment against, the administrator. Mills v. Henry, 1 Lea, 144.
This bill is filed by complainants, who are devisees of Julius Raht, to cancel the decree and deed uuder which Defendant Meek claims as a cloud upon their title to the one undivided one-eighth interest of A. P. Caldwell.
This alienation by the heir was previous to the beginning of any s¿iit to subject the lands of the intestate to the satisfaction of debts due by the intestate. The lands of an intestate descend to the heir. They are assets only sub modo, and cannot be subjected by the creditor in the heir’s hands until it is shown that the personalty has been exhausted in the payment of debts. Lauds bona fide aliened by the heir before the bringing of a suit to subject the land to payment of debts are not liable to the creditor, but the heir in such case is answerable to the creditor for the value of .the land aliened. Code, §§1763, 1764, 2256.
The purchaser from the heir will, as against the creditor of the intestate, acquire a good and *277indefeasible title, provided be is a bona fide purchaser, but the burden is upon him, when the creditor seeks to subject such land, to show that his purchase was in good faith. This we regard as settled by the case of Gibson v. Jones, 13 Lea, 692.
The registered deed of the heir operated to convey the legal title to his vendee. This could only be defeated by the suit of a creditor to which the alienee was a party. Such a vendee had a right to show, if he could, that the personalty had not been exhausted, or that he was a bona fide purchaser. Obviously his title cannot be affected by a suit against the heir alone. The proceeding under which defendant claims to have acquired the title of A. P. Caldwell was void so far as it affected the interest previously conveyed to Julius Raht. It is immaterial now to inquire whether this alienation was bona fide. This inquiry would only be relevant in a suit by a creditor to subject alienated lands. The defendant is not such a creditor, and his title must stand or fall upon the validity of a title acquired under a proceeding to which the alienee of the heir was not a party. The alienee of the heir is not bound by such a decree, and the title of the purchaser under such a decree is invalid in so far as there had been a previous registered alienation by the heir.
Affirm the decree, with costs.