Court Opinion

ID: 9738395
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:51:52.60493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:05.636122
License: Public Domain

Ryan, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the conclusion of the per curiam opinion that 1975 PA 227 is unconstitutional as violative of art 4, § 24 of the Constitution of 1963. I dissent from that portion of the opinion which states an intention to issue later a second opinion dealing with other raised constitutional issues, because I am persuaded that today’s determination of unconstitutionality terminates the statutory life of 1975 PA 227 and thus there remains no legisla*134tion upon which this Court may later express an opinion of constitutionality under Const 1963, art 3, §8.