Court Opinion

ID: 989381
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:06:19.687447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.669998
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7950

WILLIAM H. KING,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-1541-AM)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                   Decided:   May 30, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the
reasoning of the district court. King v. Thompson, No. CA-95-1541-
AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2