Court Opinion

ID: 8467013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:55:00.381758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.189518
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Corey Eugene Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.