Court Opinion

ID: 2895973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:04:04.917603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:36.660863
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-06-0211-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 28, 2007

______________________________

ERSKINE L.T. ALLEN, JR., 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 137
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 22580; HON. CECIL G. PURYEAR, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Order Dismissing Appeal

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Erskine L.T. Allen, Jr. (appellant) filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his request for DNA testing pursuant to article 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.  However, our review of the record did not disclose a written order nor was a hearing held wherein the trial court made an oral pronouncement denying appellant’s request.  Our review did find a handwritten notation on appellant’s motions purportedly written by the trial court stating that no action would be taken.  Therefore, we abated the matter back to the trial court to determine whether a final appealable order had been rendered in this cause. 

A hearing was held by the trial court pursuant to this court’s abatement order.  Furthermore, the trial court made findings which have been filed with this court in a supplemental clerk’s record.  According to the clerk’s record, the trial court found that the handwritten notation was not a final, appealable order and that appellant’s motion for DNA testing is still pending.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.  
See McIntosh v. State, 
110 S.W.3d 51, 52-53 (Tex. App.–Waco 2002, no pet.).
 

  

Brian Quinn   

          Chief Justice

Do not publish.