Court Opinion

ID: 5456597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:20:57.936052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:41.072574
License: Public Domain

Barnard, J.
According to the cases of Claflin a. Sanger (11 Abbotts' Pr., 338; S. C. at Chambers, 31 Barb., 36), Moody, a. Townsend (3 Abbotts’ Pr., 375), and Davis a. Morris (21 Barb., 152), all decided by the Supreme Court of this district, the confessions of judgment in these actions are insufficient. But, I think, the cases of Freligh a. Brink* (22 N. Y., 418), and Banning a. Carpenter (20 Ib., 447), have overruled the above cases in this district.
The principle in the above two cited cases in the Court of Appeals will sustain the judgments in these actions.
Motion denied, with $10 costs.

 The case of Freligh a. Brink, 22 N. Y., 418, reverses S. C., 30 Barb., 144, and 16 How. Pr., 272 ; and affirms S. C., 18 How. Pr., 89.