Court Opinion

ID: 9833295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:35:49.621663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:01.350139
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Upon further consideration on motion for rehearing, we have concluded that the evidence set out in the original opinion is such as to make a jury question of the issue of appellees’ liability. That evidence, when construed most favorably to appellant as it must he, tends to show that appellant refused to deliver the tractor to T. M. Stevens until ap-pellee agreed to pay for it, and was induced to part with it in reliance upon that promise. If a jury should resolve that issue in favor of appellant, it would entitle him to'recover of appellee for the agreed purchase price of the tractor, or, as the case may be/ for its reasonable market value. ,
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, and the judgment reversed and the cause remanded.