Court Opinion

ID: 5738856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:38:21.294097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:01.841122
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered October 26, 2006, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of a rear-end automobile collision, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted as to fault only, and the matter remanded for further proceedings, including the completion of disclosure as to serious injury and damages.
In opposition to the motion, defendant asserted that he was driving his vehicle within the speed limit, maintaining a 15-foot distance between his vehicle and plaintiffs in traffic that was “moving well,” when plaintiff’s vehicle suddenly stopped without warning. Absent any indication from defendant about his speed, the only permissible inference is that 15 feet was not a safe distance in traffic that was “moving well” (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a]; Johnson v Phillips, 261 AD2d 269, 271 [1999]). Defendant’s assertion that plaintiff suddenly stopped because plaintiff was tailgating a vehicle in front of him is speculation. Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.