Court Opinion

ID: 9576706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:27:17.862039+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:13:02.769428
License: Public Domain

JOSEPH, C. J.,
dissenting.
As the majority says, “The question is close and the arguments for both [positions] have been ably presented by the parties. ’ ’ 110 Or App at 181. The reason for the question’s being so close is that plaintiff’s policy and the statutes read together have created ambiguity as to plaintiffs rights. Therefore, so far as I am concerned, plaintiff wins. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insur. Exch., 275 Or 407, 411, 557 P2d 478 (1976).
The trial court should be affirmed.