Court Opinion

ID: 9400001
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-07 06:09:20.351268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:41.440637
License: Public Domain

DENY and Opinion Filed June 5, 2023

                                     S In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00377-CV

                    IN RE NICHOLAS D. MOSSER, Relator

           Original Proceeding from the 471st Judicial District Court
                             Collin County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 471-06006-2019

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia
                        Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness
      In his April 26, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator complains that the

trial court violated the automatic stay of the bankruptcy code by setting hearings in

the underlying matter. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to

demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an

adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–

36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

      After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator

has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Robbie Partida-Kipness/
                                         ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS
                                         JUSTICE

230377F.P05

                                      –2–