Court Opinion

ID: 9712174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:48:10.691516+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:10.571809
License: Public Domain

RODGERS, Senior Judge,
Dissenting.
I respectfully dissent only from that portion of the majority opinion holding that counsel for Concern can never waive the attorney-client privilege by failing to timely file objections. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc., 727 A.2d 1144 at 1164 (Pa.Super.1999) (issue of confidentiality waived due to failure to object to discovery). See also Nissley v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 435 Pa. 503, 259 A.2d 451 (1969). The holding by the majority allows the issue to be raised at any time, even after trial and appeal.
Thus, I would affirm the trial court’s order denying Concern’s motion for a protective order.