Court Opinion

ID: 9832622
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:03:48.765437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:49.647479
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Behearing.
Both appellee Ed Mulligan and appellant, Omar Gasoline'Company, filed motions for rehearing. We have considered appellee Ed Mulligan’s motion, and conclude that our former judgment in reversing and remanding his cause of action is justified. Therefore the motion is overruled.
Appellant files a motion for rehearing, contending that the judgment should be reversed as to both appellees, and Chief Justice CON-NEB and Associate Justice DUNKLIN have concluded that its motion must' be granted. I respectfully dissent, for the reasons stated in the opinion on original hearing. Motion is granted by the majority; B. H. BUCK, Associate Justice,, dissen ting.