Court Opinion

ID: 7272852
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:31:01.544126+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:47.514274
License: Public Domain

CCA 201200427. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVISTS, SUBJECT TO PUNISHMENT UNDER THE UCMJ, ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTIONS OF ARTICLE 31(b) WHEN QUESTIONED BY SENIOR SERVICE MEMBERS ABOUT SUSPECTED MISCONDUCT COMMITTED ON ACTIVE DUTY.
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT APPELLANT’S STATEMENTS WERE ADMISSIBLE UNDER ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, AND MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 305.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.