Court Opinion

ID: 9905799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-30 16:02:27.655517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:59.536575
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1555
                        ___________________________

                             Marvin Lopez Gutierrez

                            lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                          v.

            Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

                           lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                    ____________

                      Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                         Submitted: November 27, 2023
                           Filed: November 30, 2023
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Guatemalan native and citizen Marvin Lopez Gutierrez petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which affirmed an immigration
judge’s denial of withholding of removal.
       Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the agency did not err in
determining that Lopez Gutierrez failed to show there was a clear probability that his
life or freedom would be threatened in Guatemala because of his membership in a
particular social group, the only protected ground he asserted. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1231(b)(3)(A); Mayorga-Rosa v. Sessions, 888 F.3d 379, 382 (8th Cir. 2018). This
court has repeatedly held that resistance to gang membership does not present a
cognizable particular social group, and Lopez Gutierrez has offered no evidence or
argument that would warrant a different result in his case. See, e.g., Tojin-Tiu v.
Garland, 33 F.4th 1020, 1024 (8th Cir. 2022); Juarez Chilel v. Holder, 779 F.3d 850,
855 (8th Cir. 2015); Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder, 662 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 2011).
Because this issue is dispositive of Lopez Gutierrez’s claim, we decline to address his
other arguments. See Uriostegui-Teran v. Garland, 72 F.4th 852, 856 (8th Cir. 2023);
Miranda v. Sessions, 892 F.3d 940, 944 (8th Cir. 2018).

      Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________

                                         -2-