Court Opinion

ID: 7422156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:43:31.444187+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:21.431099
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING GRANTED
PER CURIAM.
We granted and have heard oral argument on rehearing. After further consideration of the cause, we adhere to our decision of October 20, 1966, whereby the alternative writ of mandamus was quashed.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
JOHNSON, District Court Judge, dissents with opinion.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.
ROBERTS, J., dissents and concurs with ERVIN, J., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge.