Court Opinion

ID: 4636847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-24 22:51:52.24402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:58:36.403491
License: Public Domain

FILE COPY

                             Fourth Court of Appeals
                                    San Antonio, Texas
                                        November 18, 2020

                                       No. 04-20-00015-CR

                                  Bronwen Victoria MCHENRY,
                                           Appellant

                                                  v.

                                       The STATE of Texas,
                                             Appellee

                 From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
                                 Trial Court No. 18-0847-CR-A
                         Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

                                          ORDER
        Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on May 6, 2020; however, neither the brief nor a
motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed. On August 18, 2020, we abated this
appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the questions (1) whether
appellant desired to prosecute her appeal, (2) whether appellant is indigent and, if so, whether
she is entitled to appointment of new counsel, and (3) whether appointed counsel has abandoned
the appeal. The trial court held a hearing on September 3, 2020. Appellant was not present. The
trial court noted, at the hearing, that its records showed that appellant had been released on
parole from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on or about July 17, 2020. The trial court
further noted that it had sent a notice of the hearing to appellant at her last known address prior
to incarceration by certified and regular mail, but the notices were returned unclaimed.

         After the hearing, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial
court found that it had sent notices to appellant as described at the hearing. As to question one,
the trial court found:

       Appellant stated it was her desire to appeal her sentence on the record when she
       was sentenced by this Court of December 3, 2019. The Appellant has had no
       contact with this Court since her release from the Texas Department of Criminal
       Justice and did not appear at the hearing conducted on September 3.

The trial court stated that it was unable to answer question two, regarding appellant’s financial
ability to afford an attorney, because the trial court had had no contact with appellant. The trial
court found, as to question three, that appellant was proceeding pro se in her appeal and that
                                                                                          FILE COPY

appellant’s previously appointed counsel had not abandoned the appeal because she had been
ordered withdrawn.

        The trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record with our court. The record
contains an advisory from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Parole Division, stating
that appellant was released from custody on July 17, 2020. A deputy clerk of our court contacted
the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to ascertain whether appellant had provided the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice with an updated address, and the Department responded that it
had no information responsive to our request. A deputy clerk of our court also telephoned a
number that appellant had listed in a document in the clerk’s record, but the number was not
receiving calls.

        In light of the foregoing, we construe the trial court’s finding that appellant has had no
contact with the trial court since her release from custody as a finding that appellant no longer
desires to prosecute the appeal. See Lopez v. State, No. 04-18-00335-CR, 2019 WL 208564, at
*1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 16, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)
(describing the trial court’s determination that a pro se appellant had abandoned his appeal based
on his failure to attend a hearing after notice had been sent to the appellant’s last known address).
In a criminal appeal, “[i]f the trial court has found that the appellant no longer desires to
prosecute the appeal, . . . the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice
may require.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4).

        We now ORDER this appeal reinstated on the docket of our court. If appellant wishes
this court to dismiss the appeal, she should file a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 42.2(a) of
the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. If no motion to dismiss is filed on or before December
3, 2020, then we will decide her appeal based on the record alone and without briefs. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4). The clerk of this court is instructed to send a copy of this order to
appellant at her last known address.

                                                      _________________________________
                                                      Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 18th day of November, 2020.

                                                      ___________________________________
                                                      MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court