Court Opinion

ID: 9726663
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 13:02:47.358324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:13:10.238145
License: Public Domain

R. B. Burns, J.
(dissenting). Reluctantly, I must dissent. In my opinion we are bound by Mielis v Everts, 264 Mich 363; 249 NW 875 (1933). Mielis has not been overruled, but has been acknowledged in Wallich Lumber Co v Golds, 375 Mich 323; 134 NW2d 722 (1965), and J Altman Companies, Inc v Saginaw Plumbing & Heating Supply Co, 42 Mich App 747; 202 NW2d 707 (1972).
I do not think it appropriate for an intermediate court to decide cases contrary to established precedent of the Supreme Court.