Court Opinion

ID: 9364159
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-18 16:03:47.129741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:36.175782
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                           LEONARD KORETS,
                               Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,
                                Appellee.

                               No. 4D22-828

                            [January 18, 2023]

   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 17-007162CF10A.

   Leonard Korets, Lake City, pro se.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Leonard Korets appeals an order summarily denying his Florida Rule
of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. In his
postconviction motion, Korets raised six grounds for relief. We affirm
grounds two through six without comment. We write to address only
ground one, on which we reverse.

   On the first ground, we ordered the State to file a response “limited to
appellant’s claim in ground one that trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to object to the jury being instructed on aggravated battery with a deadly
weapon as a lesser-included offense of attempted first-degree murder as
charged in count one of the amended information.”

   In its response to our order, the State agrees that the jury should not
have been instructed on aggravated battery with a deadly weapon as a
lesser-included offense because the amended information did not allege
that Korets used a deadly weapon.
    So we reverse the court’s order summarily denying ground one of
Koret’s motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on that claim, or for
the attachment of additional records conclusively refuting the claim. We
affirm the court’s denial of grounds two through six of the postconviction
motion.

   Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

                           *        *        *

    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                    2