Court Opinion

ID: 3691943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:34:03.707322+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:09:36.091101
License: Public Domain

{¶ 17} I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion. In this case, I do not find that sufficient evidence was presented at trial to show appellant entered into a demand note with the decedent, rather than a promissory note. It is clear from the evidence provided on behalf of the appellee that appellant entered into a promissory note with his deceased mother, thus, a fifteen-year statute of limitations should apply.
 {¶ 18} In addition, I find appellant's complete inability to provide any evidence of repayment to be a direct comment on the integrity of his argument. Accordingly, I believe the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and appellant should be ordered to repay the debt that rightfully belongs to his deceased mother's estate. *Page 1