Court Opinion

ID: 5490315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 02:28:12.121398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:45.028056
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. As the issue of the timeliness under CPLR 3212 (a) *1034of defendants’ summary judgment motion was not preserved in Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals lacks power to review either the Appellate Division’s exercise of its discretion to reach the issue, or the issue itself (see Hecker v State of New York, 20 NY3d 1087 [2013]). On the remaining issue presented, the Appellate Division properly held that defendants were entitled to summary judgment.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam and Fahey; Judge Stein taking no part.