Court Opinion

ID: 9554296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-08 17:04:03.251011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:24:01.521671
License: Public Domain

Filed 8/8/23 P. v. Abner-Decker CA3
                                           NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                        (Placer)
                                                            ----

 THE PEOPLE,                                                                                   C097368

                    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                     (Super. Ct. No. 62172438B)

           v.

 MILYNN C. ABNER-DECKER,

                    Defendant and Appellant.

         Appointed counsel for defendant Milynn C. Abner-Decker filed an opening brief
that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine
whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d
436.) After reviewing the entire record, we affirm the judgment.
         We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of
the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

                                                             1
                                     BACKGROUND
       Defendant conspired with a codefendant to burglarize a vacant home, which was
listed for sale, and she and her codefendant took several appliances and caused property
damage. Defendant pled no contest to second degree burglary of a building (Pen. Code,
§ 459). At sentencing on May 3, 2021, in accordance with the plea agreement, the trial
court suspended imposition of sentence, placed defendant on two years formal probation,
ordered her to serve a 180-day jail term with one day credit, and allowed her to apply for
alternative sentencing. The court dismissed the remaining count and reserved the matter
of victim restitution. The court assessed a $300 restitution fine, a $300 probation
revocation fine, a $40 court operations assessment, and a $30 criminal conviction
assessment.
       At the August 22, 2022, restitution hearing, the parties stipulated to restitution for
some of the damages related to the burglary. The trial court then heard testimony about
other losses incurred by the property owner and subsequently ordered additional
restitution in the amount of $35,208.00 to be paid jointly and severally by defendant and
her codefendant.
       Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal but did not include a certificate of
probable cause.
                                       DISCUSSION
       We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening
brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to
review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal.
(People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of her right
to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed.
More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.

                                              2
       Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, we find
no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.
                                      DISPOSITION
       The judgment is affirmed.

                                                      /s/
                                                  HORST, J.

We concur:

    /s/
EARL, P. J.

   /s/
DUARTE, J.

 Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

                                              3