Court Opinion

ID: 1009747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:00:56.697432+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:31.088524
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6049

KENNETH STUDWELL,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

             versus

CHIEF WARDEN; PAGE TUNR; UNIT           WILMOUTH;
COUNSELOR MCLAURAN; DR. HOLARAN,

                                              Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-02-928)

Submitted:    February 6, 2003            Decided:     February 13, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Studwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Kenneth Studwell appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Studwell v. Chief Warden,

No. CA-02-298 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2002).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2