Court Opinion

ID: 8459433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 05:45:20.794951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:07.446921
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner does not have a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal. The BIA correctly concluded that petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.