Court Opinion

ID: 1003642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:29:18.899468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:24.380129
License: Public Domain

*107
   
  PER CURIAM.
 

  Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Armstrong v. Osteen,
  
  No. MISC-00-108-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.