Court Opinion

ID: 9392697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-05 20:06:57.879771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:48.227836
License: Public Domain

People v Weaver (2023 NY Slip Op 02430)

People v Weaver

2023 NY Slip Op 02430

Decided on May 5, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 5, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ.

323 KA 21-00660

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vDANIEL WEAVER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

NICHOLAS B. ROBINSON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (THERESA L. PREZIOSO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. JORDAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered March 11, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid, we perceive no basis in the record for us to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see  CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
Entered: May 5, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court