Court Opinion

ID: 995907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:43:43.609704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:21.778263
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7715

RONALD DARRELL NEELY, #201237,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-0720-R)

Submitted:   June 9, 1998                 Decided:   August 14, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Darrell Neely, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald Darrell Neely seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration of

that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Neely v. Director, Virginia Dep’t of Cor-

rections, No. CA-97-0720-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24 & Nov. 13, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2