Court Opinion

ID: 6415184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 11:55:38.420392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:51:31.298387
License: Public Domain

Bigelow, C. J.
There was no joint liability on the part of the defendant with the subsequent indorsers. The indorsers on the draft were all liable to the holders of the draft for value on their several contracts of indorsement. There was no agreement between the parties, when the draft was made and indorsed, that they should hold any other relation towards each other than that which would result from their being successive indorsers on the draft for the accommodation of the drawer. If the last indorser paid the draft to the holder for value, he would succeed to the right of such holder, and could look to his prior indorser for payment of the amount paid by him. Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass. 615. Such payment was in fact made by the second indorsers, from whom the plaintiff derives his title to the draft. The relations of the parties to the draft can in no sense be regarded as creating a contract of joint guaranty and suretyship. The rights *216and duties of the several parties to an accommodation note or bill of exchange are the same in all respects as upon notes given for value. The legal effect of the contract into which they respectively enter by becoming parties to negotiable paper is that which .appears on the face of the bill or note. It follows that, if an accommodation indorser is obliged to take up the draft in the hands of a holder for value, he can look to his prior indorser for payment. Church v. Barlow, 9 Pick. 547. Clapp v. Rice, 13 Gray, 403. Howe v. Merrill, 5 Cush. 80.

Exceptions overruled.