Court Opinion

ID: 998296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:09:02.566109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:08.251390
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MORRIS EUGENE HAYES, a/k/a Easy,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-94-163, CA-98-366)

Submitted:   February 23, 1999             Decided:   April 1, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Eugene Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Morris Eugene Hayes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Hayes, Nos. CR-94-163;

CA-98-366 (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2