Court Opinion

ID: 4391788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-29 19:00:20.873332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:46:01.098509
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

EDUARDO SAENZ,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2019                                         Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eduardo Saenz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Eduardo Saenz appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judicial

Notice Pursuant to Rule 201.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Saenz, No. 3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 29. 2018). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2