Court Opinion

ID: 4374311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-06 17:04:09.340291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:14:58.840003
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 18-0675
                               Filed March 6, 2019

STATE OF IOWA,
     Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TOBY RYAN RICHARDS,
     Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Christine Dalton Ploof,

District Associate Judge, and Joel W. Barrows, Judge.

      Defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence for driving while barred

as a habitual offender. AFFIRMED.

      G. Brian Weiler, Davenport, for appellant.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sharon K. Hall, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

      Considered by Vogel, C.J., Vaitheswaran, J., and Blane, S.J.*

      *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019).
                                         2

VOGEL, Chief Judge.

       Toby Richards appeals from his conviction for driving while barred as a

habitual offender in violation of Iowa Code section 321.561 (2017). He asserts his

counsel was ineffective for failing to memorialize the terms of his plea agreement

on the record. Without a memorialized plea agreement, he claims we cannot

assess the terms of the agreement or whether he understood the agreement. He

also asserts his counsel failed to adequately explain the plea agreement and

allowed the State to violate the plea agreement in sentencing.

       “If an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim is raised on direct appeal from

the criminal proceedings, we may decide the record is adequate to decide the

claim or may choose to preserve the claim for postconviction proceedings.” State

v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 133 (Iowa 2006) (citing Iowa Code § 814.7(3) (2005)).

On this record, we affirm Richards’s conviction but preserve his ineffective-

assistance claims for possible postconviction relief so a complete record may be

developed and to afford trial counsel an opportunity to respond to the claims. State

v. Coil, 264 N.W.2d 293, 296 (Iowa 1978) (“Even a lawyer is entitled to his [or her]

day in court, especially when his [or her] professional reputation is impugned.”).

       AFFIRMED.