Court Opinion

ID: 9400069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-07 14:10:11.09352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:42.003170
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Waterhouse v. Summit Cty. Common Pleas Court, 2023-Ohio-1878.]

STATE OF OHIO                    )                        IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                 )ss:                     NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SUMMIT                 )

STATE EX REL. RICHARD L.
WATERHOUSE

        Petitioner                                        C.A. No.        30565

        v.

SUMMIT COUNTY COMMON PLEAS                                ORIGINAL ACTION IN
COURT                                                     HABEAS CORPUS

        Respondent

Dated: June 7, 2023

        PER CURIAM.

        {¶1}    Richard Waterhouse petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his

release from custody. Respondent moved to dismiss. Because Mr. Waterhouse has been released

from custody, the claim is moot and this Court dismisses the petition.

        {¶2}    When Mr. Waterhouse filed this action, he was incarcerated in the Summit County

Jail. After this action, and the motion to dismiss, were filed, Mr. Waterhouse resolved his criminal

cases. This Court may consider evidence outside the petition to determine that an action is moot.

State ex rel. Nelson v. Russo, 89 Ohio St.3d 227, 228 (2000).

        {¶3}    According to the docket for his criminal cases, he entered pleas, was sentenced, and

was released from custody. When a petitioner has been released from incarceration, the prisoner’s

habeas corpus claim is moot. State ex rel. Johnson v. Foley, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3634,

¶ 4.
                                                                                       C.A. No. 30565
                                                                                           Page 2 of 2

       {¶4}    Because Mr. Waterhouse has been released from custody, his petition is moot. This

case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Mr. Waterhouse.

       {¶5}    The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice

of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58.

                                                      JENNIFER L. HENSAL
                                                      FOR THE COURT

CARR, J.
STEVENSON, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

RICHARD L. WATERHOUSE, Pro Se, Petitioner.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and JACQUENETTE S. CORGAN, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.