Court Opinion

ID: 5117658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-12 11:14:44.323184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:31.289075
License: Public Domain

FILE COPY

                            Fourth Court of Appeals
                                    San Antonio, Texas
                                          October 5, 2021

                                       No. 04-21-00369-CV

      IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.B, J.A.B, J.A.B, A.J.B., AND B.B.L., CHILDREN

                   From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                 Trial Court No. 2020PA01007
                        Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

                                          ORDER
       This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s July 31, 2021 judgment terminating
A.N.L. and J.J.B.’s parental rights to their children. This court must dispose of this appeal within
180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2.
Appellate Jurisdiction
       On September 27, 2021, we ordered appellant A.N.L. to file, on or before October 4,
2021, a response explaining why this court has jurisdiction to consider her appeal. We also
ordered appellant J.J.B. to file, on or before October 4, 2021, a response presenting a reasonable
explanation for his failure to file his notice of appeal in a timely manner.
        Appellant A.N.L. timely filed a response which demonstrates that her notice of appeal
was in fact timely filed on August 20, 2021. See NA Land Company v. State, 624 S.w.3d 671,
674 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, no pet.) (“Under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
an electronically filed document is ‘deemed filed when transmitted to the filing party’s electronic
filing service provider.’”) (quoting TEX. R. CIV. P. 21(f)(5)).
        Additionally, because A.N.L.’s notice of appeal was timely filed, appellant J.J.B.’s notice
of appeal, filed on August 27, 2021, was also timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(d) (providing
when any party timely files a notice of appeal, another party may file a notice of appeal within
the time periods set out in Rule 26.1 or fourteen days after the first filed notice of appeal,
whichever is later). Therefore, we conclude this court has jurisdiction over both A.N.L. and
J.J.B.’s appeals and we retain their appeals on this court’s docket.
Appointment of Appellate Counsel for J.J.B.
       The clerk’s record and the supplemental clerk’s record show that the trial court appointed
counsel for J.J.B. at the inception of this case. Thereafter, appellant J.J.B. retained trial counsel
who represented him at trial. After the trial court rendered judgment, appellant J.J.B. filed a
statement of inability to pay court costs in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. Additionally,
appellant’s retained counsel filed a motion to withdraw and substitute counsel. To date, the trial
                                                                                        FILE COPY

court has not ruled on retained counsel’s motion to withdraw or appointed new counsel to
represent appellant on appeal. See In re J.F., 589 S.W.3d 325, 332 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2019,
no pet.) (noting that because there is no deadline for parents to file the necessary documents for
them to establish their indigence and that, given the seriousness of the rights at stake, the trial
court should address a parent’s affidavit of indigence as soon as possible and before the next
critical stage in the proceedings).
        Here, the record shows that under Rule 145 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and
section 107.013 of the Texas Family Code, appellant J.J.B. is entitled to court-appointed
appellate counsel. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013 (d),(e) (“If a court determines the parent
is indigent, the court shall appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the parent.”) (“A parent who
the court has determined is indigent for purposes of this section is presumed to remain indigent
for the duration of the suit and any subsequent appeal….”); cf. In re D.T., 625 S.W.3d 62, 71
(Tex. 2021) (concluding that section 107.013 “evidences the Legislature’s intent to afford all
parents appearing in opposition to state-initiated parental-rights termination suits the right
to effective counsel regardless of whether counsel is appointed or retained.”).
        This appeal is therefore abated to the trial court. The trial court is ORDERED to appoint
new appellate counsel to represent appellant J.J.B. in this appeal on or before October 11, 2021.
The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial
court’s order on or before October 13, 2021.

                                                     _________________________________
                                                     Irene Rios, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 5th day of October, 2021.

                                                     ___________________________________
                                                     MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court