Court Opinion

ID: 3103718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:30:31.135355+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:57.695635
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-11-0444-CR

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                    AT AMARILLO

                                       PANEL C

                                 NOVEMBER 29, 2011

                         ______________________________

                        DERRICK LYNN LEWIS, APPELLANT

                                           V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                       _________________________________

               FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY;

                  NO. 63971; HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE

                        _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                             ABATEMENT AND REMAND

      Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Derrick Lynn Lewis, was convicted of

capital murder and punishment was assessed at life without parole. On March 7, 2011,

Appellant filed his notice of appeal. The appellate record has been filed and Appellant's

brief was originally due on August 17, 2011.      After the Eleventh Court of Appeals

granted two extensions of time in which to file Appellant's brief, the brief was due on

October 10, 2011. As grounds for the first two requests for extensions, counsel cited
his work schedule as well as the transfer of this appeal from the Third Court of Appeals

to the Eleventh Court of Appeals.1 The appeal was then transferred to this Court.2 The

brief remained outstanding and by letter dated October 28, 2011, the Clerk of this Court

advised Appellant's counsel that the brief had not been filed and set a deadline of

November 7, 2011, in which to do so together with a Motion to Extend Time to File

Appellant's Brief. Counsel was cautioned that failure to timely file the brief and motion

would result in abatement of the appeal and remand of the cause to the trial court

without further notice pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. In response, on November 4, 2011, instead of filing Appellant's

brief, counsel filed a third Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief citing ”an

unusually heavy caseload."3

        By letter dated November 7, 2011, the request for a third extension was denied;

however, counsel was given until November 17, 2011, in which to file the brief with the

unequivocal admonishment that failure to comply would result in abatement and

remand. Notwithstanding this Court's letters of October 28 and November 7, counsel

filed a fourth Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief requesting additional time

to prepare the brief. As grounds, counsel asserts that he needs additional time to

1
 This appeal was originally transferred from the Third Court of Appeals to the Eleventh Court of Appeals
by an order of the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. Tex. Gov=t Code Ann.
' 73.001 (West 2005).
2
 This appeal was subsequently transferred from the Eleventh Court of Appeals to this Court by an order
of the Supreme Court due to the earlier transfer of a companion case from the Third Court of Appeals to
the Seventh Court of Appeals.
3
 This Court does not grant requests for subsequent extensions absent good cause. The normal press of
business is not considered good cause. See Curry v. Clayton, 715 S.W.2d 77, 79 (Tex.App.--Dallas
1986, no writ).

                                                   2
prepare a new point of error which was raised in the brief of Appellant's co-defendant,

Andre Hamilton, but which had not previously occurred to counsel.

       By Order of the Court, Appellant's fourth Motion to Extend Time to File

Appellant's Brief is denied. Instead, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to

the trial court to determine the following:

       1.     whether Appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
       2.     whether Appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel
              given counsel's failure to timely file the brief; and
       3.     whether Appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel.

Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue the appeal and the trial

court determines he is entitled to new appointed counsel, the name, address, telephone

number, and state bar number of the newly-appointed counsel shall be provided to the

Clerk of this Court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of law,

and shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any necessary orders to be included in a

supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by December 16,

2011. Finally, newly appointed counsel shall file Appellant's brief within thirty days after

the date of appointment.

       It is so ordered.

                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              3