Court Opinion

ID: 1314706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:26:41.168872+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:55:46.450596
License: Public Domain

61 S.E.2d 335 (1950)
232 N.C. 518
JONES et al.
v.
JONES et al.
No. 305.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 18, 1950.
Russell W. Whitener, Newton, for plaintiff appellees.
Fred D. Caldwell, Maiden, and Childs & Childs, Lincolnton, for John Jones and wife, Cora Jones, appellants.
BARNHILL, Justice.
This cause was heard at the January Term, 1950, Catawba Superior Court, and the judge entered judgment on 27 January 1950. At the same time, the cause having been disposed of on the record, the court fixed the case on appeal and also allowed time in which to serve the same. The appeal reached the office of the Clerk of this Court 30 March 1950, after the Spring Term call of cases from the Sixteenth District. The Clerk of this Court was authorized or directed to docket the appeal for the Fall Term 1950. Appellants' brief was filed 29 September 1950. On this showing, the appeal must be dismissed.
The judge fixed the case on appeal at the time judgment was entered. Service thereof was not required. Privette v. Allen, 227 N.C. 164, 41 S.E.2d 364.
It was the duty of appellants to docket their appeal at the Spring Term 1950 of this Court, fourteen days before the call of the docket of the Sixteenth District to which this case belongs. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546.
This rule is mandatory and cannot be abrogated by consent or otherwise. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. Failure to docket as thus required results in the loss of the right of appeal and necessitates dismissal. Pruitt v. Wood, supra; State v. Watson, 208 N.C. 70; 179 S.E. 455; State v. Presnell, 226 N.C. 160, 36 S.E.2d 927.
This disposition of the appeal is not due to arbitrariness on our part but is in the enforcement of a rule essential to the prompt administration of justice. Pruitt v. *336 Wood, supra. We may note, however, that, on this record, the dismissal of the appeal works no injury to any of the parties. Whatever the procedure which might be adopted in the trial of this cause in the court below, the final result would be the same.
Appeal dismissed.