Court Opinion

ID: 6919029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:53:49.516594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:44.702008
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
In an action filed by the appellants on behalf of a young boy three years of age against the appellee, the manufacturer of a toy spinning top, seeking damages for the loss of an eye alleged to have been caused by the negligent manufacture of the top, and tried to the Court without a jury, the District Judge found that the evidence failed to prove negligence on the part of the appellee, and dismissed the action.
The Court, being of the opinion that the finding is supporting by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., See: Graffius v. Weather-Seal, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 782.
It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.