Court Opinion

ID: 1008374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:39:24.195865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:00.384339
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-6852

JOHN WILLIARD HILL, a/k/a Jay Hill,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MR. CONROY; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
MARYLAND,

                                              Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-3576)

Submitted:   August 15, 2002                 Decided:   August 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Williard Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     John Williard Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Hill v. Conroy, No. CA-01-3576 (D. Md. May 21,

2002).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2