Court Opinion

ID: 1005201
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:52:56.404188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:28.533108
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6998

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HAROLD SMITH, JR.,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-85-166, CA-01-2287-6-13)

Submitted:   August 14, 2001                 Decided:   August 28, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Harold Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-85-166;

CA-01-2287-6-13 (D.S.C. May 25, 2001).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2