Court Opinion

ID: 8680229
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:41:52.09439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.786130
License: Public Domain

*137• Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larnell Hendrick appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrick v. Booth, No. 8:14-cv-04021-TDC, 2015 WL 8055172 (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.