Court Opinion

ID: 9702206
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 23:00:45.773213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:10:33.743907
License: Public Domain

CIRILLO, President Judge,
concurring and dissenting:
I join in the majority’s result, as well as the majority’s analysis and disposition of the first issue. However, I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision to address appellant’s second issue — whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing appellant to two and one-half to five years confinement. Appellant’s brief simply does not comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) or Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 513 Pa. 508, 522 A.2d 17 (1987), and this court therefore has no jurisdiction to review this issue on appeal.