Court Opinion

ID: 9496364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 16:24:35.27623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:57:31.635854
License: Public Domain

Order; Special Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI
ORDER
In United States v. Cabaccang, 332 F.3d 622, 637(9th Cir.2003), we remanded Roy Cabaccang’s conviction on Count I for reconsideration in light of our holding that he did not violate 21 U.S.C. § 952. We now GRANT appellants’ motion for clarification as to Count VI, and we remand that count to the district court. If the district court affirms Roy Cabaccang’s conviction on Count I, his conviction and sentence on Count VI shall stand. If the district court reverses the conviction on Count I, it shall reconsider Roy Cabaccang’s sentence on Count VI. We DENY appellants’ motion to remand the remaining counts, including Count II, to the district court.