Court Opinion

ID: 2893240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 22:39:38.924451+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:48:01.358919
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-06-0255-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL B

                                OCTOBER 19, 2006
                         ______________________________

                                FRANCISCO PERALTA,

                                                              Appellant

                                            v.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                              Appellee

                       _________________________________

            FROM THE 242nd DISTRICT COURT OF CASTRO COUNTY;

                    NO. B2696-0008; HON. ED SELF, PRESIDING
                       _______________________________

                           ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                         _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

       Francisco Peralta appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. On October 6,

2006, appellant’s retained counsel filed a motion to withdraw, claiming appellant failed to

meet his obligations pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement and failed to

provide the requested expenses to pay for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. So too has
appellant allegedly failed to make payment for a supplemental reporter’s record and

without this record, counsel posits that he is unable to prepare a brief.

       Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 242nd District Court

of Castro County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

       1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,

       2.     whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel and a
              free record on appeal.

       The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should the trial court find

that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and entitled to appointed counsel,

we further direct it to either appoint appellant’s existing counsel to represent appellant or

new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The name, address, phone

number, telefax number, and state bar number of the counsel, if any, who will represent

appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions

of law. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the

foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its

findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing

in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence

and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court

shall then file the supplemental record and reporter’s record transcribing the hearing with

the clerk of this court on or before November 20, 2006. Should further time be needed by

                                              2
the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before November 20,

2006.

        It is so ordered.

                                              Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                          3