Court Opinion

ID: 7336362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 23:01:50.634643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:13.176104
License: Public Domain

HARDIN, P. J.
The report of the learned referee states in his third finding the several contracts which were entered into by the parties. In his fourth finding of fact he states the sums that have been paid and allowed, as to which the defendants are entitled to credit. He finds in his fifth finding of fact, viz.: “I have computed the interest upon the balance remaining due and unpaid the plaintiff from the defendants from time to time according to the usual methods, and I find that there remains due and unpaid from the defendants to the plaintiff, at the date of this report, for said services, and under said contracts, the sum of sixty-one dollars and sixty-three cents.” He then states a general conclusion of law, and orders judgment for that amount. Inasmuch as there were specific contracts entitling the plaintiff to specific sums for his services each year, the plaintiff was *742entitled to the interest allowed by the referee. Van Rensselaer v. Jewett, 2 N. Y. 135; McMahon v. Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 463; Adams v. Bank, 36 N. Y. 255; Pursell v. Fry, 19 Hun, 598; Adams v. Fitzpatrick, 125 N. Y. 124, 26 N. E. 143. The case of Gray v. Railroad Co., 157 N. Y. 483, 52 N. E. 555, is distinguishable from the case in hand. I think the conclusion of the referee should be sustained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.