Court Opinion

ID: 9380036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-17 00:00:26.823169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:22.582029
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40468         Document: 00516679371             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/16/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                                 March 16, 2023
                                       No. 22-40468
                                     Summary Calendar                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                     Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Tyvarius Daitron Taylor,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Eastern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:20-CR-382-8
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Tyvarius Daitron Taylor has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
   developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Taylor’s claim of

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40468     Document: 00516679371          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/16/2023

                                   No. 22-40468

   ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim
   without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
   829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Taylor’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                            2