Court Opinion

ID: 9503407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 19:45:12.387477+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:27.980443
License: Public Domain

LEESON, J.,
dissenting.
In my view, the record in this proceeding does not demonstrate that applicant has overcome the characteristics that led to the previous misconduct. See, e.g., In re Griffith, 323 Or 99,106-07, 913 P2d 695 (1996) (applicant in reinstatement proceeding under BR 8.1(b) following disbarment has burden to show applicant has overcome characteristics that led to previous misconduct). Because doubt must be resolved in favor of protecting the public interest by denying reinstatement, id. at 106,1 respectfully dissent.
Carson, C. J., joins this dissent.