Court Opinion

ID: 6069946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:58:34.184709+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:52.090418
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered May 4, 1999, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
*545The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his defense of justification by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hayes, 248 AD2d 635). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the People disproved the defense of justification by legally sufficient evidence. Based on the testimony of the People’s witnesses, the jury could have concluded that the victim was unarmed and that the defendant continued stabbing him even after he was lying helplessly on the floor, when the defendant no longer had a reasonable belief that he was in mortal danger (see, Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v Arlequin, 214 AD2d 747; People v Ramsay, 199 AD2d 428). Upon the same testimony, the jury could also have concluded that the defendant did not reasonably believe that the victim was committing or attempting to commit a burglary (see, Penal Law § 35.20 [3]; People v Webb, 215 AD2d 610). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Firth, 244 AD2d 420; People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86; People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84). Bracken, P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.