Court Opinion

ID: 9480448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 07:48:15.531931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:47:41.759619
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before BAUR, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.
On consideration of the Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc filed in this case by Charles Silagy, a vote of the active members of the court was requested, and a majority of the active members of the court have voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Cudahy and Judge Ripple have submitted dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc.
All of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby DENIED.