Court Opinion

ID: 3944076
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:07:15.682244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:26.670272
License: Public Domain

Appellee sued appellant in Justice Court for $19.75 damages for killing a cow. Appellant filed in same court a written plea in reconvention for $130 damages for driving the cow on its track in front of its engine, and thereby delaying its passenger train, and expense of burying the cow. No exception was filed to this last plea, nor was it attacked as being a fraudulent attempt to confer jurisdiction upon the court, nor was any note made on his docket by the justice of the pleadings of either party. Judgment was rendered by the justice in favor of appellee for the $19.75 claimed by him, from which appellant *Page 89 
prosecuted an appeal to the County Court, in which its appeal was, on motion of appellee, dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and from this judgment of dismissal this appeal is prosecuted.
We think the County Court erred in dismissing the appeal to it. The amount in controversy in the Justice Court was the damages claimed in appellant's plea in reconvention as well as the amount sued for by appellee, and this being more than $20, the County Court had jurisdiction on appeal. Roberts v. McCamant, 70 Tex. 743
[70 Tex. 743]; Railway v. Tacquard, 3 Willson's C.C., 250. The pleading in the Justice Court being in writing, was sufficient to apprise the County Court of the matters litigated there, although the justice may have failed to do his duty in not making a note of the pleadings of the parties on his docket, as required by the statute. Whittington v. Eppstein, 3 Willson's C.C., 369; Maas v. Solinsky, 67 Tex. 290
[67 Tex. 290]. We do not think the failure of the justice to make this entry on his docket has ever been held ground for dismissing an appeal in the County Court when the pleading is entirely oral. On the contrary, it has been strongly intimated that an entry made on the docket of that court would enable the Supreme Court to review the case when appealed to. Moore v. Jordan, 67 Tex. 394.
The judgment of the County Court should be reversed, and the cause remanded, to be there tried de novo on it merits.
Reversed and remanded.