Court Opinion

ID: 5503174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 03:03:52.871255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:59.364618
License: Public Domain

Barnard, P. J.
The court of appeals has decided that the plaintiffs have a right to an injunction in this case, prohibiting the defendants from using the word “Ideal,” as applied by the plaintiff L. E. AVaterman to fountain pens of his own manufacture. The manufacture of pens by the defendants so marked is admitted; the sale is admitted by the answer.- The facts stated in the eighth defense were held not to authorize the use of the word “Ideal,” and therefore proof of facts tending to establish the same was properly excluded. The judgment was proper, and must be affirmed, with costs.
The order for an extra allowance of $250 was properly made. The case was difficult and extraordinary. The trade-mark is proven by affidavit to have been worth $50,000 at least, and the profits from the trade-mark to bo $3,000 a year. The order for the additional allowance is fully supported by Munro v. Smith, (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 426, and should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. All concur.