Court Opinion

ID: 6674150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:14:31.402657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:00:38.744386
License: Public Domain

Haskell, A. J.
I concur in the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, upon the ground that there is a total lack of evidence to support the conclusion that the executor of Lewis, either in that character or personally, had authority to act for the mortgagees, or that the mortgagees ratified his action as to them by acquiescence or otherwise. I concur further in the opinion that such parties in interest as have not taken an appeal are bound by the Circuit decree. The mortgage, therefore, to the extent not thus affected, remains a lien on the interest held by Lewis. What that interest is,-has not been considered by the Circuit judge, for the whole case turned upon the point which is error, and the right to foreclose being thus denied, the question of partition was never reached.
In concur, therefore, in the opinion that the case should be remanded for such further proceedings in the court below as may be necessary, in conformity with the views expressed by the Chief Justice on the points above indicated.