Court Opinion

ID: 3965444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:25:06.111011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:51.586747
License: Public Domain

The conviction is for possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in dry area. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for one day and a fine of $100.
The recognizance appearing in this record is wholly insufficient. It does not bind the appellant to do anything. It neither mentions the offense for which he was convicted or the court in which conviction was had, etc. Consequently, the appeal in this case must be dismissed. See Jenkins v. State,86 Tex. Crim. 266 (216 S.W. 183); Hurt v. State, 92 Tex. Crim. 347
(243 S.W. 989); Wheat v. State, 181 S.W. 727; Art. 831, C. C. P.
The appeal is dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
                          ON THE MERITS