Court Opinion

ID: 7212821
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 22:35:31.683564+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:55.006459
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Karen Dishman Powell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Powell v. St. Paul Police Dep’t, No. CA-01-27-2 (W.D.Va. July 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.