Court Opinion

ID: 5106652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 05:25:32.751168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:16.765701
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of the first-degree offenses of child molestation under Section 566.067, RSMo. (2000), and statutory sodomy under Section 566.062, RSMo. *220(2000). Appellant claims that (1) his convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence, (2) the trial court admitted improper victim impact evidence in the sentencing phase of Appellant’s trial, and (3) the trial court erred by overruling his gender Batson objection. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).