Court Opinion

ID: 7601093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 07:01:42.382746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:19:13.591237
License: Public Domain

ON RETURN TO REMAND
We remanded this case so that the trial court could make specific findings as to the reasons it relied on in revoking the appellant's *Page 637 
probation 599 So.2d 635. The trial court has fully complied with our instructions, thereby fulfilling the requirements ofMorrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593,33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778,93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). The appellant's probation was revoked because he violated two conditions of his probation. The revocation of appellant's probation is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.