Court Opinion

ID: 4643533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-16 17:04:18.160486+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:40.460287
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 19-0394
                            Filed December 16, 2020

STATE OF IOWA,
     Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MANDELL CLARK,
     Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Story County, Steven P. Van Marel,

District Associate Judge.

      Defendant appeals from his guilty plea, claiming ineffective assistance of

counsel. AFFIRMED.

      Gary Dickey of Dickey, Campbell & Sahag Law Firm, PLC, Des Moines, for

appellant.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Zachary Miller, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

      Considered by Tabor, P.J., Greer, J., and Vogel, S.J.*

      *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206

(2020).
                                          2

VOGEL, Senior Judge.

       On January 22, 2019, Mandell Clark pleaded guilty to first-degree

harassment in violation of Iowa Code section 708.7(1), (1)(a)(1), and (2)(a)(1)

(2018); stalking in violation of Iowa Code section 708.11(2) and (3)(b)(1); and

assault causing bodily injury in violation of Iowa Code sections 708.1(1) and

708.2(2). The district court accepted his plea and imposed sentence on March 1.

Clark appeals, asserting his counsel was ineffective by failing to exclude a

witness’s testimony from the minutes of evidence after the witness did not comply

with the deposition subpoena.1

       We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. State v.

Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 133 (Iowa 2006).

       It has long been established that “[w]ith limited exceptions . . . a guilty plea

taken in conformity with Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure [2.8(2)(b)] waives all

defenses and objections.” State v. Antenucci, 608 N.W.2d 19, 19 (Iowa 2000).

Even when brought as a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, those “limited

exceptions” are those that are intrinsic to the plea, that is, when a plea is not

knowingly or voluntarily entered. State v. Carroll, 767 N.W.2d 638, 641 (Iowa

2009). Clark does not claim his plea was either involuntarily or unknowingly

entered. Accordingly, his assertion on appeal that plea counsel should have

insisted the witness be deposed prior to entry of his plea is waived.

       Therefore, we affirm Clark’s conviction and sentence.

       AFFIRMED.

1Because Clark’s judgment and sentence were entered prior to July 1, 2019, when
new legislation took effect that prohibited ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
“on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings,” we may proceed with the issue
raised. 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140, § 31 (codified at Iowa Code § 814.7 (Supp. 2019)).