Court Opinion

ID: 3124850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:00:08.405356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:35.602579
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00149-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
SANDRA J. ROMERO,                                                            APPELLANT,
 
                                                             v.
 
SOFIA RUIZ MARTINEZ,                                                           APPELLEE.
____________________________________________________________
 
                    On
Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 
                                       of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
              Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Sandra J. Romero, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the
County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron, County, Texas, in cause no. CL-08-2430-A.  Appellant’s notice of
appeal states she is filing an accelerated appeal of an order rendered on
February 22, 2010.  Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared
that there is no appealable order.  
The
Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be
taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3.  Appellant
was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date
of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.  Appellant failed to respond to the Court=s notice. 
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to
correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See id.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.  See id. 42.3(b),(c).
 
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
13th day of May, 2010.