Court Opinion

ID: 7491856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:11:17.252699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:08.399712
License: Public Domain

DAUKSCH, Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. While the defendant was properly tried and convicted of receiving stolen property the judgment suffers the same technical defect as the judgment in Spurlock v. State, 281 So.2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) in that it fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part. Therefore, I would remand for the entry of a new proper judgment. Brinson v. State, 345 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).