Court Opinion

ID: 1007444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:25:39.285671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:06.849467
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-6449

JAMES JUNIOR PATILLO,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES   HANNAH,    Officer;    RICHMOND     POLICE
DEPARTMENT,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-114-2)

Submitted:   April 25, 2002                      Decided:   May 8, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Junior Patillo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James Junior Patillo, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001).     We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court.   See Patillo v. Hannah, No.

CA-02-114-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2