Court Opinion

ID: 990491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:22:25.034824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:36.801381
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, a/k/a Angel,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-26-F)

Submitted:   September 20, 1996           Decided:   October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Angel Perez, Appellant Pro Se.   John Douglas McCullough,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

Appellant's motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Perez, No. CR-93-26-F (E.D.N.C. May 23,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2