Court Opinion

ID: 9380404
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-17 22:03:50.448462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:24.732030
License: Public Domain

Electronically Filed
                                                       Supreme Court
                                                       SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                       17-MAR-2023
                                                       11:02 AM
                                                       Dkt. 5 ODDP

                         SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
________________________________________________________________

                   CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner,

                               vs.

    HPA/HAWAIʻI PAROLING AUTHORITY; EDMUND HYUN; CLAYTON HEE;
          GENE DEMELLO; and DPS/HCF STAFF, Respondents.
________________________________________________________________

                       ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                          (1PC041001534)
           ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

          Upon consideration of the petition for writ of
mandamus filed on March 13, 2023, and the record, Petitioner has
not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a
lack of alternative means to seek relief.    See Kema v. Gaddis,
91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999).
          It is ordered that the petition is denied.
          DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 17, 2023.
                              /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
                              /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
                              /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
                              /s/ Michael D. Wilson
                              /s/ Todd W. Eddins