Court Opinion

ID: 9736747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:05:11.125881+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:27:08.628868
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Reargtjment.
Per Curiam.
After our decision in the above case the petitioner asked and received permission to file a motion for reargument. Pursuant to this permission she has filed such a motion, setting out therein the grounds upon which she bases her contention that justice requires a reargument of the case.
It should be noted that our opinion was confined solely to the issues as they were related to the petition to review the preliminary agreement, and was without prejudice to any issue under any proper proceeding under the act apart from such petition. With that in mind we have carefully considered the grounds of the motion and we are of the opinion that they do not warrant a reargument of the case.
Motion denied.