Court Opinion

ID: 4247571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-22 21:15:58.080344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:01:27.807479
License: Public Domain

Filed 2/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 38

State of North Dakota, 		Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., 		Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170315

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Coleman

No. 20170315

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	
Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault—domestic violence.  Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence.
  Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte