Court Opinion

ID: 5255992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:28:05.459023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:00.619455
License: Public Domain

Woodward, J.:
The order of the surrogate appealed from is a discretionary-one and ought not to be disturbed unless the record shows that the discretion was unwisely exercised. We have nothing to guide us but the record, which discloses that the petitioners August Zimdahl and Johanna Zimdahl, of the city of Elmira, were the parents of Henry H. • Zimdahl, deceased; that Henry H. Zimdahl in his lifetime was married to Alice Thornton; that the fruit of that marriage was a son, Walter T. Zimdahl; that Henry H. Zimdahl contracted the marriage with Alice Thornton under circumstances displeasing, and justly so, to his parents; that for a short time after said marriage the couple lived with the wife’s mother, and then for a longer period with the husband’s parents, after which they lived by themselves and kept house. The wife fell ill and was taken to a hospital, where she died February 18, 1919, leaving the infant son, then a little over a year old. The father took the child with him to live with his parents, and there they remained until the father’s death, which occurred soon after. The child has continued to live with his father’s parents, and they seek the appointment of one or both of them as guardians of both the person and estate of this infant grandchild. It seems to me their claims are paramount and that one or both should be so appointed, unless some very serious reason prevents it.
The grandfather is sober, industrious, thrifty and respectable. The same is true of the grandmother. The grandfather has, except for a short interval, been in the employ of the same company for a quarter of a century. During that time he has saved enough to become the owner of a good home which he holds free from incumbrance. He is about fifty-five years of age; his wife about fifty. So they are not aged people. It is not urged that the infant’s maternal grandmother is a suitable person to appoint as guardian of either the person or estate of the infant. The surrogate has appointed her sister, Mrs. Elma Hillman, a great aunt of the infant, *56guardian of the person, and the Chemung Canal Trust Company, guardian of the property.
The record fails to tell us anything about Mrs. Hillman’s age; her circumstances; her method of living; her moral character, or occupation; whether she has a husband living or is a widow; whether she boards or has a home of her own. The record is binding on us. We think that everything else being equal these grandparents would have a claim to guardianship superior to the great aunt. In addition the evidence all preponderates in their favor.
We also think this grandfather has demonstrated his capacity to care for the $1,700 estate of the infant, and that it is likely to be more profitably managed by him than by any one else. He is prepared to give a bond.
The order of the surrogate should be modified by substituting August Zimdahl as guardian of the person, in the place of Elma Hillman, and as guardian of the property in place of the Chemung Canal Trust Company, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants.
All concur, except Lyon and Cochrane, JJ., dissenting.
Order of the surrogate modified by substituting August Zimdahl as guardian of the person, in the place of Elma Hillman, and as guardian of the property in place of the Chemung Canal Trust Company, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants.