Court Opinion

ID: 1004525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:42:29.492748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:33.392445
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6323

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID FURTADO GRAY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-95-
364-AMD, CA-99-575-AMD)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                   Decided:   May 29, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Furtado Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David Furtado Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Gray, Nos. CR-95-364-AMD;

CA-99-575-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2000, Feb. 8 & 27, 2001).    We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2