Court Opinion

ID: 2954619
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 00:23:01.218813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:37.515848
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00320-CR

Dennis Mitchell Alford, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. CR2011-284, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM
		Appellant's brief was originally due July 5, 2012.  After appellant's court-appointed
attorney, Joe Garcia, failed to respond to this Court's notice that the brief was overdue, we abated
the appeal on September 20, 2012 with instructions to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine
whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether appointed counsel has
abandoned the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2) (providing that if counsel for criminal
appellant fails to file brief, appellate court should order trial court to conduct hearing on whether
appellant wishes to prosecute appeal, is indigent, or has abandoned appeal).
		Following the hearing, the trial court forwarded its findings and recommendations
to this Court, recommending that counsel be granted an extension until October 31, 2012 to file
either a brief or motion to dismiss the appeal.  This Court granted an extension and notified Garcia 
that this Court expected appellant's brief or a motion to dismiss the appeal to be filed on or before
November 9, 2012.  No brief or motion to dismiss was filed.  Further, Garcia has failed to respond
to this Court's subsequent notice that the brief is overdue.
		We therefore order Garcia to file appellant's brief or a motion to dismiss no later than
January 11, 2013.  Failure to do so by that date will result in counsel being called before this Court
to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for violating this order, and the cause will
be abated with instructions to the trial court to appoint substitute counsel to represent appellant on 
this appeal.
		It is so ordered on this the 21st day of December, 2012.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin