Court Opinion

ID: 8462756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:34:50.306227+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.708412
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Gerald Salley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salley, No. 3:95-cr-00488-JFA-3 (D.S.C. Jan. 5 & Jan. 30, 2009); see United States v. Dun-phy, 551 F.3d 247 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.