Court Opinion

ID: 8883251
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 21:11:30.984601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:46.819057
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
We find no illegally “seized” evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.
On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).