Court Opinion

ID: 8375327
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-21 19:01:31.14435+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:31.878201
License: Public Domain

Cite as 2022 Ark. 189
               SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                     No.   D-22-613

                                              Opinion Delivered:   October 21, 2022

 ARKANSAS JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE
 AND DISABILITY COMMISSION
                    PETITIONER PETITIONER’S REPORT OF
                               UNCONTESTED SANCTION
 V.

 ROBIN CARROLL, CIRCUIT JUDGE
                  RESPONDENT

                                              SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD
                                              ORDERED TO BE FILED UNDER
                                              SEAL.

                                     PER CURIAM

      Pending before this court is Petitioner Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability

Commission’s (“Commission’s”) report of uncontested sanction following its investigation

of complaints lodged against respondent, Judge Robin Carroll of the Thirteenth Judicial

Circuit. On October 5, 2022, we ordered the Commission to file the record in this case

within fifteen days and suspended Judge Carroll without pay beginning on October 10,

2022. Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n v. Carroll, 2022 Ark. 175, ___ S.W.3d ___.

Rather than filing the record as ordered, the Commission filed an amended report of

uncontested sanction and request for expedited consideration on October 14, 2022,

claiming that the only record the Commission can submit to this court is the “Letter of

Sanction” and “Recommendation of Suspension Without Pay” that were filed with its

initial report on September 30, 2022. According to the Commission, the investigatory
records and files developed during the course of its investigation of this matter are

confidential under Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission Rule 7. While

Rule 7 may protect certain material from disclosure to the public, this court is not prohibited

from reviewing this confidential information, as we are ultimately responsible for approving,

modifying, or rejecting the Commission’s recommended sanction. See Ark. Jud. Discipline

& Disability Comm’n R. 12(D), (G). We therefore order the Commission to file forthwith

the entire record compiled in this matter, including the investigative files, with this court.

The material shall be filed under seal due to its confidential nature. If the complete record

is not filed by October 24, 2022, at 4:00 p.m., the Commission may be ordered to appear

and show cause as to why it should not be held in contempt of this court.

       Supplemental record ordered to be filed under seal.

       WOOD, J., dissents.

       RHONDA K. WOOD, Justice, dissenting. This court must amend the Rules of the

Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission to address this court’s need to have

more information before making any final determination of sanctions. As currently written,

Rule 7 gives the impression that the Commission’s files will remain confidential absent one

of the listed circumstances. And that impression certainly guides the Commission’s current

practice and judges’ interactions with the Commission. And while this court has decided to

exercise its judicial power to alter the current practice and order the files turned over, I

don’t think we should take that route in the middle of a case—especially when only two

months ago we accepted an agreed suspension without ordering the same information. See

                                              2
Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n v. Bourne, 2022 Ark. 151. I am troubled with

treating the procedural process of these cases differently.

       This court has final say both under the Rules and under Amendment 80 to determine

the appropriate sanction for a violation of judicial ethics. But currently we do not see all

relevant information to make that determination. A summary report does not provide

enough information. I would therefore amend the Rules as much as they prevent this from

happening. Otherwise, moving forward, if this court is uncomfortable with future reports

of uncontested sanctions, we should reject the agreed sanction as the Rules provide and

require the Commission to produce a full record after hearing testimony and accepting

documentary evidence.

                                               3