Court Opinion

ID: 590460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:40.684969
License: Public Domain

974 F.2d 1332
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William R. SUGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.C. T. NULTY;  G. H. Lewis;  Henry Fisher;  M. K. Basham;  G.W. Bean, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6376.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 31, 1992Decided:  September 14, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-91-674-R)
William R. Suggs, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
William R. Suggs appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Suggs v. Nulty, No. CA-91-674-R (W.D. Va.  Mar 24, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED