Court Opinion

ID: 6099392
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 20:51:58.926896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:31.507712
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered October 15, 2001, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony (see People v Morgan, 309 AD2d 768 [2003] [decided herewith]).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.