Court Opinion

ID: 996791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:55:35.589178+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:18.415905
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6947

CHARLES EDWARD ELLIS, JR.,

                                                Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

FRANK SIZER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                               Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
97-3945-CCB)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Ellis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,
Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney
General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARY-
LAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Ellis v. Sizer, No. CA-97-3945-CCB (D. Md. June 17,

1998). We also deny Appellant’s motion for transcript at government

expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2