Court Opinion

ID: 1001774
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:00:40.141729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:18.837421
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6450

MAURICE VERSHAWN HOWARD,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN R. ALDERMAN,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-357-3)

Submitted:   May 25, 2000                    Decided:   June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice VerShawn Howard, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Maurice VerShawn Howard appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Howard v. Alderman, No. CA-99-

357-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2000).   We further deny Howard’s “motion

to order transcripts.”   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2