Court Opinion

ID: 9363621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-17 14:06:04.861655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:33.006228
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Burgess, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2023-Ohio-65.]

                     CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. BURGESS.
 [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Burgess, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2023-Ohio-65.]
   (No. 2019-1457—Submitted January 11, 2023—Decided January 13, 2023.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Andrew Thomas Burgess, Attorney
Registration No. 0094128, last known address in Bothell, Washington.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 30, 2021, wherein
the court terminated the November 22, 2019 interim default suspension imposed
against respondent and ordered that respondent’s reinstatement to the practice of
law be conditioned upon his applying for reinstatement, demonstrating that he has
complied with this court’s November 22, 2019 interim default suspension order,
and submitting additional proof that he (1) had undergone an Ohio Lawyers
Assistance Program (“OLAP”) evaluation, (2) had followed any treatment or
counseling recommendations resulting from that evaluation, and (3) had paid the
costs of these proceedings, finds that respondent has complied with that order and
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). Therefore, it is ordered by this court that
respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 3} It is further ordered, consistent with this court’s June 30, 2021
opinion, that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one
year, fully stayed on the conditions that he (1) complete a one-year period of
monitored probation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(21) with monitoring focused on
law-office management, client communication, case management, and compliance
with any treatment or counseling recommendations arising from the OLAP
evaluation, (2) complete at least six hours of continuing legal education on office
                             SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

management, client communication, and case management, in addition to the other
requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and (3) refrain from any further misconduct. It is
further ordered that if respondent fails to comply with any condition of the stay, the
stay will be lifted and he will serve the full one-year suspension.
       {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Office of Attorney Services shall not issue
a certificate of good standing to respondent during any period of suspension,
including any stayed period of suspension.
       {¶ 5} It is further ordered that on or before thirty days from the date of this
order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will
serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is
further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file
with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the
probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.
       {¶ 6} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period
respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R.
V(21). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until
(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with
Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued
by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar
of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that
respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders
that the probation be terminated.
       {¶ 7} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
       {¶ 8} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Burgess, 165 Ohio St.3d
274, 2021-Ohio-2187, 178 N.E.3d 476.

                                          2
                           January Term, 2023

       KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER,
and DETERS, JJ., concur.
                           _________________

                                   3