Court Opinion

ID: 1081192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 20:47:04.5632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:12.834265
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

                                       AT JACKSON

LAMAR FLETCHER,                             )
                                            )
       Petitioner,                          ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9902-CC-00046
                                            )
vs.                                         ) LAUDERDALE COUNTY
                                            )
STATE OF TENNESSEE,                         ) No. 5138

       Respondent.
                                            )
                                            )
                                                                FILED
                                                                    July 7, 1999

                                         ORDER                 Cecil Crowson, Jr.
                                                              Appellate Court Clerk

              This matter is before the Court upon motion of the state to affirm the

judgment of the trial court by order rather than formal opinion. See Rule 20, Rules of

the Court of Criminal Appeals. This case represents an appeal from the trial court’s

dismissal of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is currently

serving a life sentence, having been found to be an habitual criminal in 1985. In his

present petition, the petitioner claims that his conviction is void because his trial

attorney worked as a Public Defender and Assistant District Attorney at the same time.

The trial court found that the petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief and

dismissed the petition.

              Habeas corpus relief is available in Tennessee only when “it
              appears upon the face of the judgment or the record of the
              proceedings upon which the judgment is rendered” that a
              convicting court was without jurisdiction or authority to
              sentence a defendant, or that a defendant’s sentence of
              imprisonment or other restraint has expired.

Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993) (emphasis added). The petitioner’s

sentence has not expired. The petitioner does not allege the trial court lacked

jurisdiction. The petitioner’s claim, if meritorious, would merely make the judgment

voidable, not void. See Passarella v. State, 891 S.W.2d 619 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

Accordingly, the trial court properly determined the petitioner is not entitled to relief in

this instance. Moreover, this issue has previously been decided against petitioner in a

prior post-conviction proceeding. See Fletcher v. State, No. 02C01-9409-CR-00188
(Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

             For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED that the state’s

motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule

20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs of this appeal shall be taxed to the

state.

                                         ______________________________
                                         JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

                                         ______________________________
                                         DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

                                         ______________________________
                                         JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE

                                            2