Court Opinion

ID: 9418072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:07:22.965094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:36.606237
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice McKenna
dissents.
The final order of the Circuit Court of the United States for Idaho, in Haywood v. Nichols, No. 251, on appeal, is affirmed on the authority of Pettibone v. Nichols, ante, p. 192, from which, as to the facts or the questions involved, it does not differ. The orders in Pettibone v. Whitney, No. 265, Morey v. Whitney, No. 266, and Haywood v. Whitney, No. 267 — each of which cases is here upon writ of error to the Supreme Court of Idaho — involve the same questions as those determined in Pettibone v. Nichols, and by agreement is to depend upon the judgment in that case, must also be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Mr. Justice McKenna dissents.