Court Opinion

ID: 7475087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:47:33.812972+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:54.804478
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the special assistant public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished the appellant with a copy of the *643special assistant public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the special assistant public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.