Court Opinion

ID: 2882859
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 16:30:34.242635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:10.749631
License: Public Domain

In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-06-00063-CR
______________________________

ANTHONY DELEON, SR., Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                                              

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court
Hunt County, Texas
Trial Court No. 21,888

                                                 

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Anthony Deleon, Sr., has filed with this Court a motion to extend the time for filing his
notice of appeal.  According to Deleon's motion, the judgment is dated December 14, 2004. 
            A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918
S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which a notice
of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case.  A defendant's
notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended
in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new
trial.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.  The motion filed does not refer to a motion
for new trial having been filed in this case.  The last date Deleon could timely file his notice of
appeal was January 13, 2005, thirty days after the day, according to his motion, the sentence was
imposed in open court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Further, no motion for extension of time was
filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.
 
 
 
 
 
 
            Deleon has failed to perfect his appeal.  Accordingly, we overrule Deleon's motion for
extension of time to file his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III
                                                                        Chief Justice

Date Submitted:          April 11, 2006
Date Decided:             April 12, 2006

Do Not Publish 

60;We have jurisdiction to determine whether we have jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d
519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
            If a certification showing that the defendant has the right to appeal is not made a part of the
appellate record, we must dismiss the case unless the record indicates that an appellant may have the
right to appeal.  See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Greenwell v.
Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth Judicial Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 
Nothing in the record indicates that the certification is in error or that Hughes has a right to appeal.
            We hold that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
 
                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III
                                                                                    Chief Justice

Date Submitted:          August 3, 2005
Date Decided:             August 4, 2005

Do Not Publish