Court Opinion

ID: 2767674
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-08 22:02:12.065068+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:18:18.276600
License: Public Domain

Filed 1/8/15 P. v. Terrell CA2/5
                  NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                     SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                  DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,                                                          B251601

         Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   (Los Angeles County
                                                                     Super. Ct. No. BA379758)
         v.

KEISHON TERRELL,

         Defendant and Appellant.

         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Craig R.
Richman, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
         Roberta Simon, under appointment of the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
         Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney
General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chung Mar and Jessica C.
Owen, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.
                                                 _______________
       Appellant Keishon Terrell was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of
willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder in violation of Penal Code1
sections 664 and 187, subdivision (a). The jury found true the allegation that in the
commission of the offense a principal personally used a handgun, personally and
intentionally discharged a handgun, and personally and intentionally discharged a
handgun causing great bodily injury within the meaning of section 12022.53,
subdivisions (b) through (e)(1). The jury also found true the allegation that the offense
was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang within the meaning of section
186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(C).
       The trial court sentenced appellant to a term of 15 years to life in prison for the
attempted murder pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision (b), plus a 25-year-to-life
enhancement term pursuant to section 12022.53, subdivisions (d) and (e)(1). The court
imposed but stayed, a 10-year gang enhancement term pursuant to section 654. The court
awarded appellant a total of 1087 days of presentence custody credit.
       Appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending the trial court
erred in imposing a minimum term of 15 years for the life sentence for the attempted
murder conviction. Appellant also contends he is entitled to two additional days of
custody credit. Respondent agrees with both contentions, as do we. We modify
appellant’s sentence and custody credits, as set forth in more detail in the disposition.
The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

                                            Facts
       On January 5, 2011, appellant drove a Range Rover into Rollin 40s gang territory.
Codefendant Marquise Turley was a passenger in the vehicle. Both men were members
of the Black P Stones gang, which is a rival of the Rollin 40s gang. Someone in the
vehicle shot Marcus Flagg as he walked down the street. Flagg was not in a gang, but he
associated with gang members.

1
       Further section references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
                                              2
                                         Discussion
       1. Attempted murder sentence
       Appellant contends the trial court erred in imposing a minimum term of 15 years
for his life sentence for the attempted murder as well as a term of 25 years to life for the
firearm enhancement. He contends that the two enhancements may only be imposed
when the jury has found that the defendant personally used a firearm, and no such finding
was made here. Appellant is correct.
       Section 12022.53, subdivision (e)(2) provides, “An enhancement for participation
in a criminal street gang . . . shall not be imposed on a person in addition to an
enhancement imposed pursuant to this subdivision unless the person personally used or
personally discharged a firearm in the commission of the offense.”
       The jury in this case found only that a principal personally used and personally
discharged a firearm. Thus, appellant was not subject to the 15-year minimum term
provided in section 186.22, subdivision (b). (People v. Valenzuela (2011) 199
Cal.App.4th 1214, 1238.) The 15-year minimum must be stayed. (Ibid.) Appellant is
subject only to a life term with a minimum term of seven years for the attempted murder
conviction.

       2. Custody credit
       The trial court awarded appellant 946 days of actual custody and 141 days of
conduct credit, for a total of 1087 days. Appellant contends he is entitled to credit for
one additional day of actual custody and one additional day of conduct credit for a total
of 1089 days. He is correct.
       A defendant is entitled to credit from the day he is processed into jail through the
date of sentencing. (§ 2900.5, subds. (a), (d); People v. Ravaux (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th
914, 919-921.)
       Appellant was arrested and taken into custody on January 6, 2011. He was
sentenced on August 9, 2013. He spent 360 actual days in custody in 2011, 366 days in

                                              3
actual custody in leap year 2012 and 221 days in actual custody in 2012, for a total of 947
days of actual custody.
       Appellant’s conduct credits were limited to 15 percent. (§ 2933.1.) Fifteen
percent of 947 is 142.

                                           Disposition
       The judgment is modified to stay imposition of the 15-year minimum parole
eligibility term pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision (b). The judgment is also
modified to award appellant 947 days of actual custody credit and 142 days of conduct
credit for a total of 1089 days of presentence conduct credit. The clerk of the superior
court is instructed to prepare an amended abstract of conviction reflecting these
modifications, and to deliver a copy to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
       NOT TO PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.

                                   GOODMAN, J.*

We concur:

       TURNER, P. J.

       KRIEGLER, J.

*
        Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
                                             4