Court Opinion

ID: 2925316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:19:06.563705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:34.885703
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00098-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
HARROD'S PROPERTIES, INC. 
D/B/A HOLIDAY INN, LTD.,
 	Appellant,

v.

HELDT ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A 
RAINBOW INTERNATIONAL CLEANING
AND RESTORATION,	Appellee.
	____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court 
of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 20, 2008.  On April 2,
2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). 
Appellant failed to respond to this Court's notice.
	On March 25, 2008, the Clerk further informed appellant that it was delinquent in
remitting a $175.00 filing fee due in our Court for the filing of the notice of appeal on
February 19, 2008, and noted that it had previously been notified that this filing fee was
due.  The Clerk notified appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was
not paid within ten days from the date of this notice.  See id. 42.3(c).  Appellant failed to
pay this fee. 
	Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief.  Appellant has further failed to
pay required fees as directed by the Clerk of this Court.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c). 

									PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 3rd day of July, 2008.