Court Opinion

ID: 8311174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 13:48:30.680573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:44.000364
License: Public Domain

Thayer, J.,
(orally.) A clause in a contract agreeing generally to submit all of the questions that might arise under the contract to arbitration, is void; the same being against public policy, because the effect is to oust the jurisdiction of the courts. Nevertheless, it is competent for parties to stipulate in a contract that the value of property contracted to be sold or delivered shall be ascertained or fixed by arbitrators chosen for such purpose. Such special stipulations in contracts, relating to the manner in which the value of things forming the subject-matter of the contract shall be ascertained, are valid. In the latter class of cases, parties cannot ignore the stipulation and sue on the contract; they must at least make an effort to have the value of the thing ascertained according to the stipulations in the-agreement, before suit can be maintained. Motion overruled.