Court Opinion

ID: 8626069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 13:35:13.437498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:38.155593
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Petitioner Paul A. Weidner, a Florida state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his federal habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed Weidner’s petition as time-barred, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), but then granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to the underlying constitutional claims raised in the petition.
A federal habeas petitioner must obtain a COA from the district court to appeal the denial of his § 2254 habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). However, “[w]hen a district court dismisses a petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate to grant a COA on the [underlying] constitutional claim.” Ross v. Moore, 246 F.3d 1299, 1300 (11th Cir.2001). As a result, in Ross we vacated the order granting a COA and remanded to the district court “for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether appellant’s habeas petition is time-barred.” Id.
Here, the facts are identical to Ross. As a result, we vacate the order granting a COA and remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether Weidner’s § 2254 petition is time-barred.
VACATED AND REMANDED.