Court Opinion

ID: 9883005
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-05 22:23:08.484401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:03:34.765157
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Peroli v. Medina Cty. Prosecutor, 2023-Ohio-2320.]

                               IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

 JUSTIN P. PEROLI                                       Case No. 2023-00002PQ

          Requester                                     Judge Lisa L. Sadler

          v.                                            JUDGMENT ENTRY

 MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR

          Respondent

         {¶1} In this public-records case, a Special Master has issued a Report and
Recommendation in which the Special Master recommends denial of Requester’s claims
and assessment of costs against Requester. (Report and Recommendation, 4.)
         {¶2} Neither Requester nor Respondent has filed timely written objections to the
Report and Recommendation in accordance with R.C. 2743.75(F)(2).                Pursuant to
R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects, then this Court “shall promptly issue a
final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an
error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” Upon
independent review, the Court finds that there is no error of law or other defect evident
on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Report
and Recommendation.
         {¶3} Accordingly, in accordance with the Special Master’s recommendations, the
Court denies Requester’s claims and assesses court costs to Requester. The Clerk shall
serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

                                                    LISA L. SADLER
                                                    Judge
Filed June 6, 2023
Sent to S.C. Reporter 7/7/23