Court Opinion

ID: 1016424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:49:01.442377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:58.572135
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 04-7845

MICHAEL A. WHITE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Unknown
Defendant; RUEBEN GREENBERG,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-03-382-8-27)

Submitted:   March 30, 2005                 Decided:   June 22, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. White, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Patrick Corrigan, III,
GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Michael A. White appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.        See White v.

Greenberg, No. CA-03-382-8-27 (D.S.C. Oct. 22, 2004).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -