Court Opinion

ID: 9883037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 01:35:45.691677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:20.769782
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD
dissenting.
I dissent from the judgment of the court in this ease, and that is all I think it necessary to say in reply to several of the prominent topics discussed in the opinion of a majority of the court. But there are three propositions laid down in the opinion to which I desire specially to refer as not receiving my assent, because I think they are of some practical importance.
1. The Circuit Coui’t admitted the church record, or evidence of its contents, after proof of its loss. The effect of the decision here is that it was not admissible. Unless I am greatly deceived, the ruling of the Circuit Court is sustained by all the authorities upon the subject. Apart from authorities if seems to me that it was correct in principle, as evi denced by the general course of practice.
2. Second proposition referred to has respect to the testi*196mony of the attorney. I think it was properly excluded as falling within the rule of privileged communication; and I am also of the opinion that the suggestion of waiver is utterly without foundation or just pretence.
3. Reference is made in the third place to the construction given to the charge of the Circuit Court. Rightly interpreted, the charge, as it seems to me, is correct; but the opinion of the majority of the court places a construction upon it which I think does great injustice to the judge who presided at the trial.
Having stated the three propositions to which I dissent, I do not wish to add anything to the statement.