Court Opinion

ID: 4164495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-04-28 19:04:24.544661+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:55.413096
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 17-1324

CHARLES BAILEY,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

WARFIELD & ROHR,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03255-RDB)

Submitted: April 25, 2017                                         Decided: April 28, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Jay Swerdlin, Parker Engle Thoeni, SHAWE &
ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Charles Bailey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment

discrimination complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bailey’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bailey has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th

Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2