Court Opinion

ID: 991873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:43:16.133961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:49.589405
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-7521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

ARTHUR MANSFIELD BECKNER,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-92-141, CA-96-24-R)

Submitted:   March 27, 1997                 Decided:   April 3, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Mansfield Beckner, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. United States v. Beckner, Nos. CR-92-
141, CA-96-24-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2