Court Opinion

ID: 8885768
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 21:48:03.600674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:54.472803
License: Public Domain

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
I concur in the foregoing result and in the opinion, however, I wish to state my view that the mere absence of a work preservation clause in a collective bargaining agreement is not a sufficient fact to authorize the Board to completely dispose of the case by use of a per se “right to control” test. Further, that nothing we have said concerning the absence of a work preservation clause should be construed as indicating our opinion as to the inferences to be drawn from that fact when the Board, on remand, considers all the circumstances of the case. At that time the Board should consider all the facts and come to its own conclusion after considering all possible tests of the union’s objectives.