Court Opinion

ID: 9961750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-19 18:01:02.320421+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:46.893287
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11130     Document: 64-1      Date Filed: 04/19/2024   Page: 1 of 3

                                                    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                     In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eleventh Circuit

                           ____________________

                                  No. 23-11130
                           ____________________

       DORIS HADCOCK
                                                                 Plaintiﬀ,
       SHELLEY CARRIER,
       personal representative of the estate of
       Doris Hadcock,
                                                       Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       JEST OPERATING, INC.,
       d.b.a. Somerset,
       PATRICIA R. LEININGER,
       MERIDETH C. NAGEL,
       MERIDETH NAGEL, P.A.,
       ELIZABETH HEIMAN,
USCA11 Case: 23-11130    Document: 64-1     Date Filed: 04/19/2024    Page: 2 of 3

       2                     Opinion of the Court               23-11130

                                                  Defendants-Appellees,

       MICHAEL J. ROGERS, et al.,

                                                             Defendants.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cv-00095-JSM-PRL
                          ____________________

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              We have considered all arguments raised on appeal by Plain-
       tiff-Appellant Shelley Carrier, including that:

              I.   The district court abused its discretion in excluding
       the testimony and report of Kathryn Strodel.
             II.   The district court abused its discretion in excluding
       evidence and testimony relating to Neal Hadcock’s probate.
              III. The district court abused its discretion in excluding
       evidence of Neal Hadcock’s residency at Somerset Assisted Living
       Facility.
USCA11 Case: 23-11130     Document: 64-1     Date Filed: 04/19/2024    Page: 3 of 3

       23-11130              Opinion of the Court                        3

              IV. The district court erred in granting Defendants’ mo-
       tions for directed verdicts.
              After careful review and consideration of the briefs and the
       record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversi-
       ble error in the proceedings in the district court. Therefore, the
       judgment of the district court is
             AFFIRMED.