Court Opinion

ID: 2964594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:28:01.844137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:51.624434
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-2212

                                 RENALDO ALAN BROWNE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. TREASURY, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Robert B. Collings, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
                                             _____________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                        _____________
                              Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                   ____________________
                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
                                          _____________

                                 ____________________

            Renaldo Alan Browne on brief pro se.
            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                    March 27, 1997
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his
                      __________

            complaint  as "frivolous"  under former  28 U.S.C.    1915(d)

            (now codified at  28 U.S.C.   1915(e)(2)(B)).   Reviewing the

            dismissal  de  novo, and  upon  consideration of  plaintiff's
                       __  ____

            brief, we see no basis  for disagreeing with the magistrate's

            reasoning and  conclusion.  The  judgment is  affirmed.   See
                                                          ________    ___

            Loc. R. 27.1.

                                         -2-