Court Opinion

ID: 8156706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:42:51.28497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:36.934247
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula, 309 U. S. 94, 105; James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U. S. 134, 149; General Construction Co. v. Fisher, 295 U. S. 715; Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; (2) International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 579, 588-*57289; Natural Gas Co. v. Slattery, 302 U. S. 300, 306-7.
Mr. Wm. M. Hall for appellant. Mr. Leo J. Mundt for ap-pellee.