Court Opinion

ID: 8681967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:37:11.524254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.989255
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dmitry Pronin appeals the district court’s notice 'regarding his right to respond to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Pronin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED