Court Opinion

ID: 7799103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-09 13:03:50.837971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:54.647757
License: Public Domain

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

                                                    Decided: August 9, 2022

       S22Y0917. IN THE MATTER OF AMBER HOLLY BUNCH.

        PER CURIAM.

        This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and

recommendation                 of     Special         Master         Delia        T.     Crouch,          who

recommends that the Court accept the petition for voluntary

surrender of license filed by Amber Holly Bunch (State Bar No.

994313), after the filing of a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227

(c).     In her petition, Bunch requested that she be allowed to

voluntarily surrender her license for her admitted violations, in two

separate but related matters, of Rules 1.3, 1.15 (I) (a), 1.15 (I) (c),

1.15 (II) (a), 1.15 (II) (b), and 3.2 of the Georgia Rules of Professional

Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). While one of the matters has

not yet been docketed with this Court, is considered confidential,

and was not before the Special Master, Bunch waived confidentiality
and requested that the Special Master also consider the admissions

of fact and rule violations in that matter as part of her petition.

     In her petition, Bunch, who has been a member of the State

Bar since 2016, admitted the following facts. With regard to State

Disciplinary Board Docket (“SDBD”) No. 7462, Bunch admitted that

in December 2017, a client retained her for a personal injury action

arising from an accident. Bunch eventually settled the client’s claim

against the defendant for the policy limit of $100,000 in April 2018

and deposited the settlement check into her IOLTA account.

However, Bunch failed to safeguard the settlement funds and

allowed the balance in her trust account to fall below the amount

she should have held for the client, and she also failed to maintain

records reflecting the balance held for her client in the IOLTA

account.   In addition, Bunch maintained personal funds in her

IOLTA account during the same time she held funds for the client;

she withdrew funds for her personal use; and she did not deliver the

settlement funds to her client until January 2021. She further

admitted that she used personal funds to disburse the settlement

                                   2
funds to her client and that she did not disburse the settlement

funds from her IOLTA account. During the litigation of her client’s

lawsuit, Bunch also failed to adequately respond to discovery sent

by the uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier on behalf of the

client, and the uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier filed

several motions to compel discovery, but Bunch failed to file a

response to those motions either. With regard to SDBD No. 7508,

the undocketed matter, Bunch admitted that from September 2018

to March 2020, she maintained personal funds in her IOLTA

account; she failed to keep records showing the exact balance held

for each client; and she failed to safeguard client funds.

     Based on her conduct in SDBD No. 7462, Bunch admitted

violating Rule 1.3 by failing to respond to motions on behalf of her

client. In addition, she admitted violating Rules 1.15 (I) (a) and 1.15

(I) (c) by failing to safeguard the client’s settlement funds,

commingling personal and client funds, failing to keep complete

records of the client’s funds, failing to properly account for the

client’s funds, and failing to promptly deliver the settlement funds

                                  3
to the client. Next, Bunch admitted that she violated Rules 1.15 (II)

(a) and 1.15 (II) (b) by failing to administer client funds from a trust

account, by failing to maintain records reflecting the balance held

for her client, and at times having a lower balance in her trust

account than the amount she should have been holding for her

client. Bunch also admitted that she could not ascertain from her

existing records when the client’s money had been withdrawn and

for what purpose. Next, Bunch admitted that she violated Rule 3.2

by failing to respond to discovery and motions filed against the client

in order to expedite the litigation consistent with the client’s

interests. Finally, as to SDBD No. 7508, Bunch admitted that based

on her conduct she violated Rules 1.15 (I) (a) and 1.15 (II) (b) by

failing to safeguard client funds, by commingling client and personal

funds in her trust account, and by failing to keep records of client

funds, including the exact balance held for each client.           The

maximum penalty for a violation of each of these Rules is

disbarment, except Rule 3.2, for which the maximum penalty is a

public reprimand.

                                   4
     After the State Bar responded and recommended that the

Special Master accept Bunch’s petition for voluntary surrender of

license, the Special Master issued her report, recommending that

this Court accept the petition for voluntary surrender of license. In

a thorough report and recommendation, the Special Master agreed

that Bunch’s admitted conduct as outlined in her petition supported

violations of Rules 1.3, 1.15 (I) (a), 1.15 (I) (c), 1.15 (II) (a), 1.15 (II)

(b), and 3.2. The Special Master further determined that, although

relatively inexperienced in the practice of law, Bunch demonstrated

personal conduct that was antithetical to the standards required of

those licensed to practice law in this state and that warranted and

compelled       disbarment.      Accordingly,      the   Special    Master

recommended that this Court accept Bunch’s petition for voluntary

surrender of license, which is tantamount to disbarment. See Bar

Rule 1.0 (s).

     Having reviewed the record, we agree to accept the Special

Master’s recommendation, which is consistent with prior, similar

cases. See In the Matter of Sims, 313 Ga. 117, 119 (868 SE2d 192)

                                     5
(2020) (accepting voluntary surrender of license on recommendation

of Special Master where attorney committed multiple trust account

violations); In the Matter of Flit, 309 Ga. 440, 441 (846 SE2d 403)

(2020) (accepting voluntary surrender of license on recommendation

of Special Master where attorney failed in two separate matters to

give accounting of settlement proceeds or deliver funds to clients);

In the Matter of Dabney-Froe, 302 Ga. 746, 746-747 (808 SE2d 649)

(2017) (accepting voluntary surrender of license where attorney

failed promptly to disburse funds or provide accounting of funds).

Accordingly, it is ordered that the name of Amber Holly Bunch be

removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the

State of Georgia. Bunch is reminded of her duties pursuant to Bar

Rule 4-219 (b).

     Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.

                                  6