Court Opinion

ID: 1007937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:32:36.106633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:19.203325
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6160

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RODNEY ALLEN HAYNES,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
Chief District Judge. (CR-98-27, CA-00-962-2)

Submitted:   June 20, 2002                 Decided:   June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Abell, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Michael Lee
Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rodney Allen Haynes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Haynes, Nos. CR-98-27; CA-00-962-

2 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2001).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2