Court Opinion

ID: 19855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:28:35+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:40.318278
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 98-11244
                         Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LONNIE CHARLES SMITH,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                          (93-CR-29-19)
                      --------------------
                        February 2, 2000

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Defendant-Appellant Lonnie Charles Smith appeals the district

court’s denial of his motions for relief from judgment filed

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 60(b) following the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence.

Smith did not argue in his Rule 60(b) motions that the district

court erred in dismissing his § 2255 motion.   Rather, Smith raised

new arguments challenging the validity of his underlying criminal

conviction.    Rule 60(b) is not the proper vehicle in which to

allege additional claims that were not raised prior to judgment.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
See Behringer v. Johnson, 75 F.3d 189, 190 (5th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, Smith cannot show that the district court abused its

discretion in refusing to consider his additional claims raised for

the first time in his Rule 60(b) motion.     The district court’s

orders are

AFFIRMED.

                                2