Court Opinion

ID: 9903445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-27 15:36:28.6994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:16.325733
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                      FIFTH DISTRICT

                                    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EDMOND SANTIAGO,

            Appellant,

 v.                                         Case No. 5D22-2370
                                            LT Case No. 2020-DR-11282

SHAYNNA LEANNE POSEY,

          Appellee.
________________________________/

Opinion filed March 2, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Brevard County,
Nancy Maloney, Judge.

Quoc Van, Sanford, for Appellant.

Heather C. Harris, of The H. Harris
Law Firm, Merritt Island, for Appellee.

LAMBERT, C.J.

      The final judgment dismissing Appellant’s petition to determine

paternity is affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Rev. v. Cummings, 930 So. 2d 604,

605 (Fla. 2006) (holding that the legal father is an indispensable party in an
action to determine paternity unless it has been conclusively established that

the legal father’s rights to the child have been divested by some earlier

judgment). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant bringing an

action for paternity that includes the legal father of the subject minor child as

a party.

      We next address Appellee’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees and

costs incurred in this appeal. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b)

provides, in pertinent part, that “a motion for attorneys’ fees shall state the

grounds on which recovery is sought.” A motion filed under this rule must

identify the particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis for an

award of attorney’s fees on appeal. See United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Phillips,

775 So. 2d 921, 922 (Fla. 2000) (interpreting rule 9.400(b) to require that a

party’s motion seeking appellate attorney’s fees “provide substance and

specify the particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis for an

award of fees on appeal”).

      The sole basis identified in Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees is

section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2022). This statute authorizes an award of

appellate attorney’s fees in the context of dissolution of marriage

proceedings, not in paternity proceedings. The statutory basis for an award

of attorney’s fees in a paternity proceeding is section 742.045, Florida

                                       2
Statutes, which has not been pled.         Accordingly, Appellee’s motion for

appellate attorney’s fees is denied.

      Lastly, we strike that part of Appellee’s motion seeking an award of

appellate costs, without prejudice to Appellee timely filing the motion in the

circuit court following the issuance of our mandate. See Fla. R. App. P.

9.400(a) (“[Appellate c]osts shall be taxed by the lower tribunal on a motion

served no later than 45 days after rendition of the [appellate] court’s order.”);

In re Guardianship of Bloom, 251 So. 3d 1026, 1029 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)

(“Generally, if a party to an appeal files a motion in this court for an award of

costs on appeal, this court will strike the motion because such costs are

properly sought in the first instance in the trial court.” (footnote omitted));

Garcia v. Collazo, 178 So. 3d 429, 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (striking a motion

for costs on appeal without prejudice to the moving party filing a timely

motion under rule 9.400(a) in the circuit court).

      AFFIRMED; APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY’S

FEES DENIED; APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR APPELLATE COSTS

STRICKEN, without prejudice.

MAKAR and JAY, JJ., concur.

                                       3