Court Opinion

ID: 9931324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-08 19:04:13.888403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:18:08.131232
License: Public Domain

Filed 2/8/24 In re A.G. CA2/6
     NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         DIVISION SIX

In re A.G., a Person Coming                                  2d Crim No. B326762
Under the Juvenile Court Law.                             (Super. Ct. No. 22JV-00206)
                                                           (San Luis Obispo County)

THE PEOPLE,

     Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MARIA B.,

     Defendant and Appellant.

      Maria B., legal guardian of minor A.G, appeals an order of
the juvenile court granting the San Luis Obispo County
Probation Department the authority to make medical decisions
on A.G.’s behalf.
      In August 2022, the prosecutor filed a petition pursuant to
Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging that A.G.
committed battery and vandalism, among other offenses. The
juvenile court later released A.G. to return to Maria B.’s care on
home supervision. Four days later, A.G. was arrested after
stealing Maria B.’s vehicle and crashing it.
       At the October 27, 2022, disposition hearing, the juvenile
court declared A.G. a ward of the court and committed A.G. to
Coastal Valley Academy for one year. A.G.’s counsel agreed and
later filed a petition requesting an order granting the probation
department the authority to arrange gender affirming medical
care for A.G. The court scheduled a hearing regarding the
petition and received three psychological evaluations or opinions
concerning A.G.’s transgender status. The court considered the
evaluations and Maria B.’s objections, and then granted the
petition to permit the probation department medical decision
making authority.
        We appointed counsel to represent Maria B. in this appeal.
After counsel’s examination of the record, counsel filed an
opening brief raising no issues.
       On September 29, 2023, we advised Maria B. that she had
30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or
issues that she wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a
response.
       We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
Maria B.’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities
and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25
Cal.3d 436, 441.)

                                2
                       DISPOSITION
     We affirm the judgment.
     NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                 GILBERT, P. J.
We concur:

             BALTODANO, J.

             CODY, J.

                             3
                     Brian R. Aronson, Judge*

            Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

                 ______________________________

     Jesse McGowan, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* (Retired Judge of the Sutter Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief

Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Calif. Const.)

                                  0