Court Opinion

ID: 8272675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:37:26.367891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:34.645047
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The questions presented for consideration by this writ of error are identical with those discussed by us in the opinion delivered at this term in the ease of McGrath v. Bayonne, ante p. 188; and for the reasons set ont in that opinion the judgment under review in the present case will be reversed.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chibe Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 11.