Court Opinion

ID: 4401461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-29 19:42:53.914669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:44.978140
License: Public Domain

People v Kelley (2019 NY Slip Op 04202)

People v Kelley

2019 NY Slip Op 04202

Decided on May 29, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 29, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-10830

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRaya Kelley, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1502/17)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Sean Nuttall of counsel), for appellant.
John M. Ryan, Acting District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Christopher Blire-Koessler of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J.), imposed August 3, 2017, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid because the Supreme Court's colloquy conflated the right to appeal with the rights that are automatically forfeited on a plea of guilty (see People v Johnson, 165 AD3d 702; People v Ortizcora, 163 AD3d 1001; People v Resnick, 159 AD3d 724). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.
However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court