Court Opinion

ID: 994507
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:03.382052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:08.124810
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

DERRICK DUSHAWN WILLIAMS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-92-97, CA-97-353-2)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Dushawn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.       Robert Michael
Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-92-97; CA-97-353-2 (M.D.N.C.
Nov. 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2