Court Opinion

ID: 8678318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:34:27.530127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.089589
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James A. Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) actions without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henson v. Wilt, Nos. 1:14-cv-03724-RDB; 1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB (D.Md. Jan. 4, 2015). We deny Henson’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.