Court Opinion

ID: 1019501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:36:20.57323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:25.550194
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-1059

TIMOTHY R. GEORGE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARY HANNAH; ANY AND ALL DOES, each in their
individual capacity,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-74-F-5)

Submitted: May 16, 2006                          Decided: May 22, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy R. George, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Mary
Roccapriore Pelletier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Timothy R. George appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).         We

have   reviewed   the   record   and     find   no   reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

George v. Hannah, No. CA-05-74-F-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2005).           We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                 - 2 -