Court Opinion

ID: 6341475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-17 17:02:11.100817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:22.028115
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 16-1575V
                                       Filed: April 22, 2022
                                          UNPUBLISHED

    MELISSA HOWIE,
                                                              Special Master Horner
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                        Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Decision

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                        Respondent.

Braden Andrew Blumenstiel, The Law Office of DuPont & Blumenstiel, Dublin, OH, for
petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                 DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

       On July 1, 2021, petitioner moved for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in
this compensated case. (ECF No. 117.) Petitioner requests a total award of
$80,052.80 2 for her counsel and confirms pursuant to General Order 9 that she herself
did not incur any expenses in prosecution of her claim. (Id. at 3.) In response,
respondent confirms that the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and
costs is met in this case but otherwise defers to the special master regarding the
1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, it will
be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, it will be
redacted from public access.
2 When the case was initially filed, petitioner was represented by James Blumenstiel, who retired
subsequently retired. Braden Blumenstiel became counsel of record on January 2, 2018. Petitioner
requests attorneys’ fees and costs be awarded to each counsel separately. The fees and costs
breakdown as follows: $26,842.50 in attorneys’ fees and $966.29 in costs to James Blumenstiel and
$42,518.38 in attorneys’ fees and $9,824.30 in costs to Braden Blumenstiel. Petitioner’s motion actually
misstates the amounts at issue. Whereas Braden Blumenstiel’s billing records reflect $42,518.38 in
attorneys’ fees, the motion states the total as $42,420.00. (Compare ECF. No. 117-5, p. 10 and ECF No.
117, p. 3.) Whereas James Blumenstiel’s billing records reflect $966.29 in costs, the motion states that
he incurred $966.00 in costs. (Compare ECF No. 117-2, p. 4 and ECF No. 117, p. 3.)

                                                       1
amount of the award. (ECF No. 118.) No reply was filed. I have reviewed petitioner’s
application in its entirety and award attorneys’ fees and costs in the reduced amount of
$63,202.72 for the reasons discussed below.

        James Blumenstiel’s billing records include the following entries that require
adjustment. In July of 2016, Mr. Blumenstiel billed at his full rate for a total of 5 hours of
travel time. (ECF No. 117-2, p. 1.) This will be reduced by half. 3 Additionally, he
included several activities that are best described as secretarial in nature. These will
not be compensated. 4 Specifically, the following reductions are made: 9/26/2016 –
“scan as exhibits 1200 pages of records” (2.15 hours); 11/28/2016 – “prepare all docs.
For electronic filing and filed petition” (2.6 hours); 1/16/2017 – “BATES
STAMP/SCAN/MARK EXH. ALL MED.RECS.&AFFS./file” (5.75 hours); 5/2/2017 –
“copy and address envelope to Resp. Att. For mailing Notice of Change of Address” (.25
hours); 6/20/2017 – “scan/burn exh. #13 on 3 discs for Court and Resp., draft and file
notice of intent to file CD” (1.8 hours); 8/10/2017 – “mark, scan, draft notice of filing
exhibits and finalize file” (1.2 hours); 8/17/2017 – “burn exhibits on 2 CD’s for sending
with letter of engagement” (1.75 hours); 8/18/2017 – “scan exh. #13 at Staples for
burning to a disc” (1.6 hours); 8/18/2017 – “copy certain exhibits to mail with expert
letter” (.7 hours); 12/26/2017 – “copy pertinent documents for transfer file to Braden”
(.75 hours). (See ECF No. 117-2, pp. 1-4.) In total, these reductions total $4,736.25
(21.05 hours x $225 per hour).

       Braden Blumenstiel asserts a rate of $350 per hour which he suggests is
consistent with a forum rate for an attorney with 16 years of overall legal experience and
12 years of experience handling Vaccine Act cases. (ECF No. 117-4, p. 1.) However,
Mr. Blumenstiel has previously been awarded (and billed at) $225.00 per hour for all
work performed in 2017 to 2021. See, e.g., Lawrence v. Sec’y of Health & Human
Servs., No. 14-835V, 2021 WL 5410246, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Oct. 27, 2021);
Bailey v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-1417V, 2021 WL 4270225, at *2
(Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Aug. 18, 2021); King v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 17-
625V, slip op. at 3 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jun. 10, 2020). Apart from citing $350 as a
“standard” rate for an attorney with his level of experience, Mr. Blumenstiel does not
specifically address or substantiate a departure from what he has previously billed and
been awarded. Nor do I find that his performance specific to this case could warrant
any upward adjustment. 5 The undersigned will apply the previously awarded hourly rate

3 Travel time in this program is usually billed at 50% of an attorneys’ typical rate. E.g. O’Neill v. Sec’y of
Health & Human Servs., No. 08-243V, 2015 WL 2399211, at *7 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. April 28, 2015)
(explaining that there is no bright line rule, but that the Vaccine Program commonly awards attorneys half
their established billing rate for time travelling). Although this is technically a rate reduction, for ease of
calculation I will reduce the hours by 50%, an equivalent reduction.

4This program does not pay for tasks which are secretarial in nature. Guy v. Sec'y of Health & Human
Servs., 38 Fed. Cl. 403, 408 (1997) (denying compensation for office overhead including office supplies,
administrative or clerical staff, and secretarial support.)
5In an order to show cause issued September 19, 2019, I warned that: “Unfortunately, due to petitioner’s
counsel’s performance, this case is in danger of dismissal for failure to prosecute for the third time since
Mr. Braden Blumenstiel became counsel of record. Petitioner’s counsel has made excessive requests for

                                                       2
of $225.00 per hour to the 97.7 hours billed by Mr. Blumenstiel in this matter, 6 resulting
in a reduction of $12,212.50. 7

       Based on my review, the remainder of the fees and costs requested are
reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and
costs in a reduced amount of $63,202.72.

      In light of the above, petitioner’s application for interim attorneys’ fees and costs
is GRANTED with reductions and petitioner is awarded $63,202.72 as follows:

            •   a lump sum in the amount of $23, 072.54, representing
                reimbursement for $22,106.25 in attorneys’ fees and $966.29 in
                attorneys’ costs, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner
                and her counsel, James Blumenstiel, Esq.; and

            •   a lump sum in the amount of $40,130.18, representing $30,305.88 in
                attorneys’ fees and $9,824.30 in attorneys’ costs, in the form of a
                check made payable to petitioner and her counsel, Braden
                Blumenstiel, Esq.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the
clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                          s/Daniel T. Horner
                                                          Daniel T. Horner
                                                          Special Master

additional time to complete necessary filings and has allowed deadlines to lapse on four separate
occasions without filing anything on behalf of petitioner.” (ECF No. 90, p. 3.)
6In her motion, petitioner indicates that Mr. Braden Blumenstiel billed 121.2 hours in this case (ECF No.
117, p. 3); however, based on the billing records filed this total includes paralegal time (ECF No. 117-5.)

7 Because Mr. Blumenstiel’s billing records do not provide separate hour tallies for attorney and paralegal
time, this reduction was calculated as follows: The differential between the requested and awarded
hourly rate is $125 per hour. Multiplied by the 97.7 hours of attorney time tallied by the undersigned, this
equals a reduction of $12,212.50.
8
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Vaccine Rule 11(a).

                                                      3