Court Opinion

ID: 2825054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-11 05:46:21.239838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:53.031602
License: Public Domain

court's finding that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, had not approved the
                     agreement beyond the expired deadline is supported by substantial
                     evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Id. at 672-73, 119 P.3d at 1257; see
                     NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev.
                     222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the
                     petition. NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674,
                     677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991).
                                 It is so ORDERED.

                                                                                            J
                                                               Saitta

                                                                                             J.
                                                               Pickering

                     cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
                          Hawkins Melendrez, P.C.
                          Charles L. Geisendorf, Ltd.
                          Howard Kim & Associates
                          Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                          2
(0) 19474    7e97,