Court Opinion

ID: 9365145
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 21:00:41.196087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.423719
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7151      Doc: 15         Filed: 01/20/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-7151

        ROBERT WILLIAM LOSE, JR.,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        FELICIA BACORN, CPS Caseworker; CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES,
        DHHR; JENNIFER STEPHENS, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney; WESTOVER
        POLICE DEPARTMENT; JUDGE GAUJOT, Family Court Judge; ANDREW
        FRYE, Family Court Attorney,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
        Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00121-GMG-RWT)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 20, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Robert William Lose, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7151       Doc: 15         Filed: 01/20/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Robert William Lose, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without

        prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint after he failed to pay the initial partial filing fee.

        We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

        reasons stated by the district court. Lose v. Bacorn, No. 3:22-cv-00121-GMG-RWT (N.D.

        W.Va. Sept. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

                                                      2