Court Opinion

ID: 9442985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:05:58.521937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:18.931402
License: Public Domain

POPE, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I approve the judgment of the court as announced in the majority opinion, and agree that upon a petition of this kind we should carefully examine the record for the purpose of determining that the Board had jurisdiction to make its order and that it has *700not “traveled outside the orbit of its authority”. Such procedure is in conformity with the ancient practice of courts of equity when asked to enter a default decree.
With respect to other matters stated or suggested by the opinion', I do not think that the rule of National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 66 S.Ct. 553, 90 L.Ed. 739, has been modified either by the language of the statute or by anything said in Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, or in Labor Board v. Pittsburg SS. Co., 340 U.S. 498, 71 S.Ct. 453. The language of § 10(e) of the Act quoted and relied upon in the Cheney Lumber Company case has not been changed in the later Act.