Court Opinion

ID: 3026619
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 22:36:18.22964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:44.091505
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 00-2656
                                    ___________

John Smart; Sota Foods, Inc., d/b/a King *
of Potatoes; John Smart &                *
Associates, Inc.,                        *
                                         *
      Plaintiffs - Appellants,           * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the
      v.                                 * District of North Dakota.
                                         *
Sunshine Potato Flakes, L.L.C.,          *   [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
      Defendant - Appellee.              *
                                   ___________

                              Submitted: May 16, 2001

                                   Filed: May 22, 2001
                                    ___________

Before LOKEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       In August 1997, John Smart, John Smart & Associates, Inc., and Sunshine Potato
Flakes, L.L.C., entered into an Exclusive Distributor Agreement containing a broad
arbitration clause. The contractual relationship ended in January 2000, and arbitration
proceedings commenced in which breach-of-contract claims and counterclaims have
been asserted. John Smart and two of his companies filed this diversity action against
Sunshine, alleging that a post-termination letter from Sunshine’s plant manager to
customers was defamatory. Responding to a motion by Sunshine, the district court1
entered an order staying the lawsuit and directing the parties to arbitrate this dispute.
The Smart plaintiffs appeal, arguing their defamation claims are not arbitrable.

       Absent a district court certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) -- and there was
no such certification in this case -- an interlocutory order staying an action and directing
arbitration is not appealable. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(b); Lebanon Chem. Corp. v. United
Farmers Plant Food, Inc., 179 F.3d 1095, 1102 (8th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellee’s motion for an award of costs
and attorneys’ fees is denied.

       A true copy.

              Attest:

                 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

       1
        The HONORABLE RODNEY S. WEBB, Chief Judge of the United States
District Court for the District of North Dakota.

                                            -2-