Court Opinion

ID: 6067214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:41:12.637688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:45.187683
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D. Friedman, J.), rendered June 18, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation were improper is unpreserved for appellate review since he raised only general objections to the challenged remarks, did not request curative instructions when his objections were sustained, and did not move for a mistrial (see, People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818; People v Davis, 277 AD2d 248 [case No. 1]; People v Feliciano, 254 AD2d 496; People v Oreckinto, 253 AD2d 896; People v Scotti, 220 AD2d 543). In any event, most of the challenged remarks either constituted fair comment, or were made in response to the defense counsel’s arguments on summation, and none was so prejudicial as to require reversal (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Davis, supra; People v Jones, 255 AD2d 600; People v Feliciano, supra). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.