Court Opinion

ID: 2959276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 03:54:54.775945+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:42:15.323348
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-14-00575-CR

                                 Ex parte Kelly James McCarty

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. 30842B, HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

                               DISSENTING OPINION

                 Article 11.072 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the statute pursuant to which

McCarty filed his application for writ of habeas corpus, explicitly states that the application “must”

challenge the legal validity of either the conviction for which community supervision was imposed

or the conditions of community supervision.1 McCarty’s application challenges neither—instead,

he seeks only an out-of-time appeal. The Court of Criminal Appeals, in the context of an application

for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to article 11.07, has characterized a request for an

out-of-time appeal as seeking “only an opportunity to appeal.”2 Such a request is not, according to

the high court, “a challenge to the conviction” and does not “concern the validity of the prosecution

or the judgment of guilt.”3 Following the same logic, this Court has previously held (albeit in an

unpublished opinion) that a complaint concerning the denial of a right to appeal, including a request

       1
           Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.072, § 2(b).
       2
           Ex parte McPherson, 32 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
       3
           Id.
for an out-of-time appeal, is “not a valid claim under article 11.072.”4 Unless and until the Court

of Criminal Appeals instructs us otherwise, I would rely on the same logic today.

                Whether McCarty has, or ought to have, some remedy in his circumstances may

be another matter, but he has invoked only article 11.072, and courts are bound to construe

and apply the statute as the Legislature has given it to us. I cannot conclude that the trial court

abused its discretion in denying McCarty’s request for an out-of-time appeal on the ground that

article 11.072, as written and as applied to this record, does not authorize such relief. Accordingly,

I respectfully dissent.

                                               __________________________________________

                                               Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Filed: April 29, 2015

Do Not Publish

        4
         Ex parte Sheikh, No. 03-10-00370-CR, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 7098, at *41-43
(Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 17, 2012, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

                                                  2