Court Opinion

ID: 9864662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 14:44:31.177975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:13.908882
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
The petition to transfer this cause to the supreme court for rehearing is denied.
We do not think it was necessary to say, as intimated by the district court of appeal, that the assignment to the Carpenter and Biles company would be good against a levy made upon the fund after the assignment and before notice thereof to the debtors, the Dunhams. But if such notice to the debtors was necessary to make the assignment good against a subsequent execution levy or attachment levy, the notice given to the plaintiff, who was the trustee and holder of the fund and agent- of the Dunhams to pay it to Williamson or to his assignee, as the case might be, was a sufficient notice to the debtor, and operated to perfect the transfer of the title to the fund.