Court Opinion

ID: 3112995
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:12:46.857865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:21.432350
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                                FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                         ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:             01-13-00842-CV
Style:                    In re Courtney Nixon

Date motion filed*:       October 18, 2013
Type of motion:           Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Party filing motion:      Real Party In Interest
Document to be filed:     Real Party In Interest’s Response

Is appeal accelerated?       No

If motion to extend time:
       Original due date:                  October 18, 2013
       Number of prior extensions:          0          Current Due date: October 18, 2013
       Date Requested:                     October 25, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

             Granted
              If document is to be filed, document due: October 25, 2013
                      The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
             Denied
             Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
             Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature:/s/ Sherry Radack
                
Panel consists of                  ____________________________________________

Date: October 21, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision