Court Opinion

ID: 992156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:47:30.143735+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:35:11.189931
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7308

TODD SMITH,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; STATE OF SOUTH CARO-
LINA; CHARLES E. CONDON, Attorney General of
South Carolina,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-95-2191-3-6BC)

Submitted:    May 1, 1997                    Decided:   May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. Smith v. Ward, No. CA-95-2191-3-6BC (D.S.C. Aug. 9,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2