Court Opinion

ID: 9963883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-26 15:01:07.044804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:04.722596
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-3058
                         ___________________________

                                   James Paul Aery

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

  Robert Billings, Sgt. Deputy; Individual & Official capacities; Ben Dickinson,
Jailer; Individual & Official Capacity; Tate, Jailer; Individual & Official Capacity;
    Beltrami County; Patricia Grimsely, Beltrami County Deputy; Individual &
  Official Capacity; Colandra Allen, Captain Beltrami County Jail; Individual &
                                 Official Capacity

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

       MEND, Medical Provider at Beltrami County Jail; Todd A. Leonard,
                          Doctor/Owner of Mend

                             lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
                                     ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                          for the District of Minnesota
                                  ____________

                             Submitted: April 18, 2024
                               Filed: April 26, 2024
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________
PER CURIAM.

       James Aery appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment as
to claims against certain parties in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After careful
review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal because the
order granting summary judgment is not final and appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(appellate jurisdiction over final decisions of district courts); Thomas v. Basham, 931
F.2d 521, 523 (8th Cir. 1991) (stating that appellate court has obligation to raise
jurisdictional issues sua sponte; appealable order typically ends litigation on merits
and leaves nothing for court to do but execute judgment). There is no final judgment
because claims against other parties, which were stayed pending bankruptcy
proceedings, remain unresolved in the district court. See Kramer v. Cash Link Sys.,
652 F.3d 840, 841 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where
claims subject to stay remained pending after entry of judgment on other claims).

        While Mr. Aery could have moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) for a
certification from the district court to appeal less than all claims on the grounds that
there was “no just reason for delay,” he made no such motion. And, there is no
indication on this record that the district court intended to certify the summary
judgment for appeal. Our precedent establishes that “there should be no doubt as to
the district court’s intention to certify.” Sargent v. Johnson, 521 F.2d 1260, 1263 n.4
(8th Cir. 1975). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because
it is premature.
                         ______________________________

                                          -2-