Court Opinion

ID: 2633861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-11-01 21:18:46.073137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:23.921103
License: Public Domain

180 P.3d 66 (2008)
218 Or. App. 432
In the Matter of M.A.F., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
M.A.F., Appellant.
070767299; A136381.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted on Record and Briefs February 1, 2008.
Decided March 12, 2008.
Liza Langford, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and ROSENBLUM, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. *67 ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant's mental illness causes her to be unable to provide for her basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state's concession to be well-founded and accept it.
Reversed.