Court Opinion

ID: 9478871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 07:01:22.553818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:46:40.581243
License: Public Domain

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge
concurring.
I concur. While it usually would be appropriate, where the district court had failed to give full attention to a basis for removal, to remand for consideration by the district court, I believe that we save judicial time and effort in this ease to reverse and hold that removal was proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1). What is really at issue here is whether Conrad’s alleged actions amounted to a violation of Robinson’s Title VII rights which clearly arise out of federal law and cannot be enforced under Ohio law. See Fox v. Eaton Corp., 48 Ohio St.2d 236, 358 N.E.2d 536 (1976).