Court Opinion

ID: 811495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-11-07 20:08:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:10.462780
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 12-6980

HOMER AVERY WOOD,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

DR. DONALD V. MICKLOS; LINDA PADGETT, RN; R. MEADOW; CYNTHIA
A. HESTER,

                Defendants - Appellees,

          and

BETH CHADWICK; DR. JOHN B. SMITH,

                Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03039-D)

Submitted:   November 2, 2012               Decided:   November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Homer Avery Wood, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough,
Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh,
North  Carolina;   Yvonne   Bulluck  Ricci,   Assistant Attorney
General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Homer Avery Wood appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                   We

have     reviewed   the   record    and    find    no    reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.     Wood v. Micklos, No. 5:10-ct-03039-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27,

2012).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions    are   adequately    presented    in   the    materials

before    the   court   and   argument    would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                     2