Court Opinion

ID: 7062702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 07:22:36.543041+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:14.157392
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM2
Julio Pacheco-Adame appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal entry of a deported alien. Pacheco-Adame contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), it is illegal to impose a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony not pled in the indictment nor admitted as part of the plea. PachecoAdame also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb.8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-1025 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.