Court Opinion

ID: 9468839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 02:25:07.230411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:41:04.925160
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The appellants’ petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc has been submitted to the court. A poll of the court was requested, and in the poll an evenly divided court voted to deny rehearing en banc.
The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied.
It is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.
Entered at the direction of Judge Murna-ghan. Judge Russell, Judge Widener, Judge Hall, Judge Ervin and Judge Chapman would have granted rehearing.