Court Opinion

ID: 5590131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 02:07:09.252005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:24.878228
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to support the verdict. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices cononr, except Russell, G. J., and Sutcheson, J., who dissent.

'■ M. J. Yeomans, allorney-general, W. O. Forehand, solicitor-geneneral, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant attorneys-general, Philip Newbern, and Levy Rogers, contra.