Court Opinion

ID: 1000501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:41:41.082051+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:44.230345
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RAMON ACOSTA, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-247, CA-98-588-1)

Submitted:   December 16, 1999         Decided:     December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramon Acosta, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Patrick Auld, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ramon Acosta, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     See United States v. Acosta, Nos. CR-95-247; CA-98-588-1

(M.D.N.C. June 18, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2