Court Opinion

ID: 2795557
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-22 00:00:50.043299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:37.169567
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-41025      Document: 00513013088         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/21/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 14-41025                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      April 21, 2015
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR HUGO MADRIGAL-DAVILA

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:14-CR-73-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Victor Hugo Madrigal-Davila
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge
of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C.
§ 841.      Accordingly, Madrigal-Davila’s unopposed motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.