Court Opinion

ID: 3807713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:47:39.003446+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:04.735812
License: Public Domain

This action was commenced in the district court of Pittsburg county by the Palmer Clothing Company, plaintiff in error, against W. O. Britt and A. E. Britt, doing business under the name and style of Britt-Sheffield Company, defendants in error, for $881 due upon two promissory notes and an unpaid check. Judgment for defendants in error, and plaintiff in error appeals.
It was admitted by counsel for both parties in oral argument and in their briefs that the issues made up by the pleadings and the decisive facts in this case are the same as in the case of Doyle Dry Goods Company v. W. O. Britt and A. E. Britt, No. 15256, just decided by this court, 110 Okla. 35, 235 P. 1077, except in the name of the plaintiff in error and the amount involved. Upon said issues, facts and the legal propositions applicable, the decision in the instant case must follow the decision in the case, supra, which opinion is adopted as the opinion in this case and the syllabus of that case is also adopted and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.