Court Opinion

ID: 3462952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 20:28:40.474937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:04:30.500661
License: Public Domain

Dear Mr. Harris:
This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General in regard to eligibility of a member of the Board of Trustees of the State Employees Group Benefit Program to retain that position upon the retirement of that Board member who was elected pursuant to R.S. 42:872 (A)(5)(b).
Title 42 is "Public Officers  Employees" and Part IV of Chapter 12, "Group Insurance", is "State Employees Group Benefits Program". Therein R.S. 42:871 creates the Board of Trustees of the State Employees Group Benefits Program within the Department of the Treasury. R.S. 42:872 provides in paragraph "A" the Board shall be composed of thirteen members, and of the thirteen, section (5) provides as follows:
      (a) Seven members who shall be participants in the insurance program, and who, following initial selection as provided in Subsection C hereof, shall be elected by the state employees who are participants in the program.
      (b) Three of these members shall be elected, one each, from the following, namely, the Department of Transportation and Development, the Department of Health and Hospitals or the Department of Social Services, and the  division of administration, office of the governor.
      (c) In addition, one employee member shall be elected from the personnel of the public institutions in higher education in the state, one employee member shall be elected from the teacher and other personnel of the elementary and secondary education system of the state, one employee member shall be elected at large from all other employee participants in the program, and one member, a retiree employee who participated in the insurance program, shall be elected by all retired employees who participate in the program.
You indicate that Mr. Louis Amedee was elected to the Board in September 1995 to serve a four year term as a representative of the Division of Administration pursuant to R.S. 42:872 (A)(5)(b), and he retired from his job at the Division of Administration on August 1, 1996 but retained his membership on the Board and was reelected as Chairman in September, 1996, which was nearly six weeks after his retirement from state service.
You feel the law does not expressly prohibit him from continuing to serve as a Board member nor is there a statute or rule which defines "vacancy" for Group Benefits' Board members, noting that a rule which would have exempted Board members from the application of a vacancy when he no longer meets the qualifications required for his initial election was rejected by the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Committee on Appropriations.
Accordingly, the Legislative Auditor requests an opinion "as to whether the retirement of a Board member elected pursuant to R.S.42:872 (A)(5)(b) renders that Board member ineligible to serve the remaining term on the Board.
We agree with your conclusion that while the board member in question met the qualifications necessary to be a member of the Board when elected by his participation in the insurance program and an employee of the division of administration, the law does not specifically state that the position will become vacant if the elected member is no longer a member of the division from which he was elected. However, we believe the intent of the provision is that an elected member of the Board would have to continue to have the qualifications required at the time of the election to remain on the Board.
To conclude that a Board member did not have to maintain the qualifications necessary to be elected to remain on the Board but could remain if retired would mean there would be two retirees on the Board inasmuch as Paragraph (c) includes the election of a retiree by all retired employees to the Board. We do not find this would satisfy the intent of Legislature in requiring the Board members be employees in various designated divisions of state government that they represent and one retiree.
Moreover, we find this consistent with the reasoning of Atty. Gen. Op. No. 86-598 which provided "the loss of status or qualifications that are prerequisite to a person's election renders him ineligible to continue to serve".
We find the ineligibility creates a vacancy, and, in accordance with Paragraph E of R.S. 42:872, the Board shall fill the vacancy by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term, but when the unexpired portion of the term is more than two years, the appointment shall be until a successor is elected to fill the unexpired portion of the term.
We hope this sufficiently answers your inquiry, but if we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
                       RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
                       By: ____________________________ BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE Assistant Attorney General
BBR