Court Opinion

ID: 8461731
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:05:06.922858+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:09.561167
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kennita Howard appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 1:06-cr-00106-IMK-JSK-l (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.