Court Opinion

ID: 7346388
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 00:56:20.300352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:21.324067
License: Public Domain

PAGE, J.
The plaintiff, as beneficiary of John Wagner, deceased, brought this action to recover $500 from the defendant as a death benefit. John Wagner had, some time prior to his death, attempted to commit suicide, and a charge to that effect was preferred against him *630in the lodge of defendant’s order of which he was a member, and a committee was appointed to investigate the charge. The committee found the charge true, but on the signing by himself and the plaintiff of agreements that in the event of the suicide of John Wagner they each renounced all claim to benefits which may arise by said death which otherwise would become payable to the plaintiff herein, thereupon John Wagner was reinstated. He died on October 28, 1910, at Bellevue Hospital.
[1] On the trial of the action plaintiff’s attorney called Frederick W. E. Engel as a witness (Mr. Engel had acted as undertaker at the funeral of John Wagner, and was also president of the defendant), who testified that he obtained for this plaintiff a certified copy of the proof of death from the board of health, for which service plaintiff paid him 50 cents. Thereupon plaintiff’s attorney called upon defendant to produce this copy, and it was offered in evidence; the attorney stating that he offered it for the purpose of showing the fact of the death of John Wagner, which was unneccessary to prove, as it was specifically admitted by the answer. Engel further testified that he sent the certificate to the financial secretary of the order. Plaintiff adopted this as his proof of death, which was required by article 7, subdivision 1, of the by-jaws of the defendant. This death certificate contained the statement that the cause of death was: “Suicide. Hemorrhage of medium basilic vein.” The only questions in the case arise from the admission in evidence of this certificate. A great deal of time was consumed in the court below upon attempting to solve the question whether Engel was acting as the agent of the plaintiff when he delivered this certificate, or whether he was acting as president of the defendant. As the plaintiff adopted his act, and predicated his demand against the defendant upon this certificate, as due notification and proof of John Wagner’s death, according to the defendant’s constitution and by-laws, it became immaterial in what capacity Engel was acting when he filed the certificate.
It has been repeatedly held that such a certificate is not competent evidence to prove the cause of death, when it is offered by the defendant. Beglin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 N. Y. 374, 376; 66 N. E. 102, and cases cited. [2] In this case, however, the plaintiff offered the certificate, and relied upon it as his proof of death; for no other proof of death was shown to have been given to defendant, without which plaintiff could not establish his cause of action. Therefore the plaintiff, relying upon this certificate as his proof of death, adopted the statement that suicide was the cause of John Wagner’s death, and it became an admission against him. Hanna v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 150 N. Y. 526, 44 N. E. 1099. Therefore the learned trial judge erred in directing judgment for the plaintiff; for, if John Wagner committed suicide, under the agreement made by John Wagner and plaintiff, all benefits by reason of his membership in the defendant order had been renounced. As there is to be a new trial of this case, we would suggest to counsel that there must be competent common-law proof of the causé of John Wagner’s death, and it should be produced. „ „ _
_ Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.