Court Opinion

ID: 4994860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-27 07:22:40.755577+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:16:47.652863
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-21-00296-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MARTIN PEREZ LEAL,                                                           Appellant,

                                            v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                           Appellee.

                    On appeal from the 24th District Court
                         of De Witt County, Texas.

                                     ORDER
             Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina
                             Order Per Curiam

      Appellant, Martin Perez Leal, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his

conviction in trial court cause number 21-07-13,626. The trial court’s certification of the

defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an

appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of
appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The

purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non-

appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered

while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and expense associated with non-

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d

645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 912

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

      Within thirty days of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Travis Berry,

is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a

right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether

appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any

amended certification.

      If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is

further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice,

identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be

modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not

addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case

law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See

Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614–15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in

the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record

                                            2
documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.

                                                                  PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered and filed on the
20th day of September, 2021.

                                          3