Court Opinion

ID: 4084075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-07 23:51:01.829492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:24.316915
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
           Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1177
KA 12-00727
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

                    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL A. COLLEN, ALSO KNOWN AS ALLEN COLLEN,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (JOHN E. TYO OF COUNSEL),
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (HEATHER PARKER
HINES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F.
Kocher, J.), rendered October 26, 2011. The judgment convicted
defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed.

     Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,
upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law §
120.05 [12]). Although we agree with defendant that it was improper
for the prosecutor to elicit testimony regarding whether defendant
agreed to give the police a written statement concerning the incident
(see People v De George, 73 NY2d 614, 619), we conclude that County
Court gave prompt curative instructions sufficient to cure any
prejudice to defendant (see generally People v Foster, 101 AD3d 1668,
1670, lv denied 15 NY3d 750).

     Contrary to the further contention of defendant, viewing the
evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury
(see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the
verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally
People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The victim and other witnesses
testified that defendant punched the victim without provocation, and
defendant is the only person to have testified to the contrary. In
resolving issues of witness credibility, we give great deference to
the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and
observe demeanor, and it cannot be said that the jury here failed to
give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see People v
Mohamed, 94 AD3d 1462, 1464, lv denied 19 NY3d 999, reconsideration
denied 20 NY3d 934).
                                 -2-                          1177
                                                         KA 12-00727

     Finally, we reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the
sentence.

Entered:   November 15, 2013                    Frances E. Cafarell
                                                Clerk of the Court