Court Opinion

ID: 217423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-05-25 17:21:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:42.650830
License: Public Domain

Case: 10-20182 Document: 00511488454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2011

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            May 25, 2011
                                     No. 10-20182
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH E. WILSON,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:08-CR-65-2

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Joseph E. Wilson has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Wilson
has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-20182 Document: 00511488454 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2011

                               No. 10-20182

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.

                                     2