Court Opinion

ID: 994165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:18:35.337048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:34.121203
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

PETE SMITH, a/k/a Jose,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
District Judge. (CR-93-117, CA-95-769-2)

Submitted:   January 22, 1998             Decided:   February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Mebane, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-93-117; CA-95-769-2 (M.D.N.C. Nov.
18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2