Court Opinion

ID: 2783570
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-03 17:08:12.123506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:02:48.895789
License: Public Domain

LMF-RS Contr., Inc. v Kaljic (2015 NY Slip Op 01766)

LMF-RS Contr., Inc. v Kaljic

2015 NY Slip Op 01766

Decided on March 3, 2015

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 3, 2015

Acosta, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter, JJ.

14422N 652976/12

[*1] LMF-RS Contracting, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
vNevzet Kaljic, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Andrew B. Schultz, Great Neck, for appellant.
Wenig Saltiel LLP, Brooklyn (Richard A. Rosenzweig of counsel), for Nevzet and Christina Kaljic, respondents.
Robert M. Olshever, P.C., New York (Robert M. Olshever of counsel), for 5 LLC, respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered on or about October 3, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants Nevzet Kaljic and Christina Kaljic's motion for summary judgment vacating the mechanic's lien, and denied plaintiff's motion to amend the mechanic's lien, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Summary disposition is warranted, because the evidence that the amount of the lien was wilfully exaggerated is conclusive (Strongback Corp. v N.E.D. Cambridge Ave. Dev. Corp., 25 AD3d 392 [1st Dept 2006]). Plaintiff included in its lien amount items
that are not for labor or materials, as its own itemization makes plain, and plaintiff has failed to even attempt to explain the discrepancies.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 3, 2015
CLERK