Court Opinion

ID: 205192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-02-21 18:14:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:47.057558
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Plaintiff-Appellant James Edward Leaf, a tax protester, appeals the Final Judgment of the district court ordei’ing that he take nothing, that his action be dismissed with prejudice, and that the government recover costs. We affirm.
 

 
   *725
   
  The aforesaid judgment was issued on the same day that the district court issued its Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of the September 22, 2010, 2010 WL 5867790, Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge which succinctly but completely analyzed the futility, in fact and in law, of Plaintiff-Appellant’s action. We have reviewed that Report and Recommendation as well as the briefs of the parities and the record on appeal and the applicable law, as a result of which we are satisfied beyond cavil that the judgment of the district court should be — and hereby is — affirmed in all respects.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.