Court Opinion

ID: 8601915
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 23:12:59.745764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:11.744056
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Petitioners’ motion to extend the time to file an opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. The Clerk shall file the opposition.
We have reviewed the opposition to the motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, and we conclude that petitioners have failed to raise a color-able constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shah continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
DISMISSED.