Court Opinion

ID: 9782651
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 19:01:42.210586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:47.838263
License: Public Domain

DEITS, S. J.,
dissenting.
I agree with the lead opinion that the stop in this case did not occur until Deputy Gerba contacted dispatch. However, I do not agree that suppression is required here. As discussed in the concurrence, the only inculpatory information that was obtained from defendant by questioning, consent, or observation was his name and date of birth. That information was obtained before Gerba made the contact with dispatch and consequently, in my opinion, before the stop occurred. Accordingly, for the reasons explained in the concurrence, defendant suffered no constitutionally cognizable detriment from the stop that requires suppression. 231 Or App at 640-42 (Haselton, P. J., concurring). I would affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.