Court Opinion

ID: 2786425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-16 18:01:03.288333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:05:09.623380
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-20031      Document: 00512969479         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/16/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 14-20031                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                    March 16, 2015
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL SECUNDINO-DIEGO, also known as Jose Secundino-Diego, also
known as Juan Morales-Costilla, also known as Miguel Diego Secundino, also
known as Miguel Secundino Diego, also known as Diego Miguel Secundino,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:13-CR-500-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Secundino-
Diego has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Secundino-Diego has not filed a response and has been
released from custody. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-20031     Document: 00512969479     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/16/2015

                                  No. 14-20031

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED
in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States
v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

                                        2