Court Opinion

ID: 9365798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-25 07:11:00.401037+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:47.675503
License: Public Domain

Order entered January 20, 2023

                                     In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                              No. 05-22-01303-CR

                          AL PATTERSON, Appellant

                                        V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

              On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3
                           Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. F20-76751-J

                                     ORDER

      Before the Court is appellant’s motion to substitute counsel.      When an

attorney substitutes for a withdrawing attorney, Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(d)

requires the withdrawing attorney to comply with Rule 6.5(b), which provides,

“The motion must be delivered to the party in person or mailed–both by certified

and by first-class mail–to the party at the party’s last known address.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 6.5(b).    The motion does not show compliance with Rule 6.5(b).

Accordingly, we DENY the motion to substitute counsel without prejudice to the
filing of a motion that complies with Rule 6.5. We DIRECT the Clerk to list

Kristen R. Brown and Meredith Belgooy as counsel of record for appellant. All

future correspondence shall be sent to Ms. Brown and Ms. Belgooey at the

addresses on file with the Court.

      The reporter’s record is due FEBRUARY 9, 2023.

                                         /s/   ERIN A. NOWELL
                                               JUSTICE