Court Opinion

ID: 9864344
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 12:33:13.243614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:58.467771
License: Public Domain

HARTZ, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I join the panel opinion except insofar as it could be read to imply that the arrest of a person is lawful when (1) an arrest warrant for the person is not supported by probable cause; (2) the officer who executed the affidavit supporting the warrant had further information that, when considered in addition to- the information set forth in the affidavit, would establish probable cause for the arrest; but (3) that officer did not communicate the additional information, directly or indirectly, to those who executed the arrest. Here, Goad’s detention at the jail was lawful because (1) as conceded on appeal, he was not arrested and his booking was the same as it would have been based on the complaint alone, and (2) there was probable cause supporting the complaint.