Court Opinion

ID: 9442852
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:01:56.167676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:15.644206
License: Public Domain

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
The motion to dismiss this appeal is overruled. Adkins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, 335 U.S. 331, 69 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed. 43, 11 A.L.R.2d 599.
We think that the district court erred in granting a summary judgment against the appellant with prejudice; but that the error may be corrected and substantial justice done by modifying the summary judgment so as to provide that the same be without prejudice, and that the cost of this appeal be paid by the City of West Palm Beach, Florida, one of the appellees. It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment appealed from be modified accordingly, and that the cost of this appeal be taxed against the City of West Palm Beach, Florida.
What we have stated above applies to the appellant Herbert Whisenant with this exception: His suit to obtain a city permit or license to do work as a master plumber, in the City of West Palm Beach, Florida, was not a true class action, and the motion to dismiss his suit in this respect summarily was properly sustained with prejudice, but the judgment to that effect should have been without prejudice to Whisenant’s right to sue individually to establish his claim to such- a permit or license by suit in any court of competent jurisdiction. Let the judgment appealed from be modified as to Whisenant to this extent and, as so modified, affirmed; the cost of appeal in this *430court to be taxed against the City of West Palm Beach, Florida.
Affirmed.