Court Opinion

ID: 572138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:14:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:42.857011
License: Public Domain

948 F.2d 1337
292 U.S.App.D.C. 229
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.SCHUERMAN DEVELOPMENT CO., a corporation organized under thelaws of the State of Idaho, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al.
No. 90-5391.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 25, 1991.

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.

1
Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is

2
ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing on October 26, 1990.   The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action.   See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam);   Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.)  (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.   See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.