Court Opinion

ID: 6916068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:41:29.989148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:39.839265
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Cashin, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 208. As to appellant’s claim of ineffective legal representation before sentence in that his counsel refused to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we also point out that a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of such a motion made after indictment. Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L.Ed. 275; Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 404, 77 S.Ct. 1332, 1 L.Ed.2d 1442.