Court Opinion

ID: 3122162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:20:06.573771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:29.690800
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00407-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 
MARSHALL SHANE HICKS,                                                        Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.
 

 
                           On
appeal from the 413th District Court 
                                      of
Johnson County, Texas.
 

 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
              Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 
Appellant,
Marshall Shane Hicks, attempts to appeal his conviction for indecency with a
child.  The trial court has certified that this Ais
a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,@ and Athe defendant has waived the right of
appeal.@  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On
August 24, 2010, this Court notified appellant=s
counsel of the trial court=s certification and ordered counsel
to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to
appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal,
or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended
certification.
On
September 14, 2010, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel=s response does not establish that the certification
currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has
a right to appeal.  
The
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if
the trial court=s certification does not show that the
defendant has the right of appeal.  Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex.
R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.  
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
 
Delivered and filed the 30th
day of September, 2010.