Court Opinion

ID: 9745707
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 10:13:53.97186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:04.235064
License: Public Domain

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2023

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-23-00366-CV

   CINDY NICHOLE KROTH AND BENJAMIN J. CORBIN, Appellants

                                        V.
      THE COMMONS OF LAKE HOUSTON PROPERTY OWNERS
                ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 127th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 2022-70631

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellants petition this court to allow a permissive interlocutory appeal of
the trial court’s May 8, 2023 order granting defendant’s traditional motion for
partial summary judgment and denying plaintiffs’ traditional motion for partial
summary judgment.

      To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would
not otherwise be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order
to be appealed involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is a
substantial ground for difference of opinion” and (2) an immediate appeal from the
order “may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Tex.
Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (e)(4);
Tex. R. Civ. P. 168. After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that
the petition does not meet the requirements for a permissive interlocutory appeal.

      Accordingly, we deny the petition for a permissive interlocutory appeal.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain.

                                         2