Court Opinion

ID: 8475855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:39:30.501477+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:25.552514
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this case back to state court. Because the remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir.2008); Borneman v. United States, 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th Cir.2000).
Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal, deny Muhammad’s motion for stay pending appeal and motion to strike, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.