Court Opinion

ID: 5299287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 03:00:35.895047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:03.138194
License: Public Domain

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The contract provisions with respect to the encroachment of the Atlantic Ocean eliminated plaintiff's objection relative to the ocean’s encroachment on the gore. The contract provisions with respect to the condemnation proceedings eliminated the question of the title to the gore, so far as the plaintiff was concerned, as the contract made the controversy between the defendants and the city, as to whether or not nominal or substantial compensation should be awarded to the defendants, one with which the plaintiff had no concern, the defendants being solely concerned in the proceeds of such property as became subject to condemnation. So much of the parcel as became subject to condemnation by the city was excluded, by the terms of the contract, from the parcel to be conveyed to the plaintiff. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this memorandum are reversed, and new findings will be made in accordance herewith. Young, Lazansky, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.