Court Opinion

ID: 8447013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:03:08.317661+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:55.862960
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
David Harold Carr appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carr v. Head, No. 1:07-cv-00180-GCM, 2008 WL 305481 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2008). We deny Carr’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.