Court Opinion

ID: 1005516
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:47.159521+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:39.706858
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6967

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAMION NELSON, a/k/a Griz, a/k/a Grizzle,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-95-51, CA-01-390-7)

Submitted:   October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damion Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Damion Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     United States v. Nelson, Nos. CR-95-51; CA-01-390-7 (W.D.

Va. May 29, 2001).      We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                   2