Court Opinion

ID: 5140910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-28 05:00:51.907966+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:26.541666
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 21-6875

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

JAY B. LEDFORD,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00465-RDB-2)

Submitted: December 21, 2021                                Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay B. Ledford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Jay B. Ledford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the

record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Ledford’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (2021) (stating standard

of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2