Court Opinion

ID: 29518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:39:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:35.946215
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-50275
                          Conference Calendar

TOMAS NORDELO CASAS,

                                      Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE BASTROP,

                                      Respondent-Appellee.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. A-01-CV-393-JN
                          --------------------
                            October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Tomas Nordelo Casas, a federal prisoner (# 44811-079), has

filed a motion requesting leave to appeal in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) following the denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2241

habeas petition as an abuse of the writ.        See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244 (a).    This court may authorize Casas to proceed IFP on

appeal only if he is economically eligible and his appeal is not

frivolous.     Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261

(5th Cir. 1986).    Casas’ failure to brief the abuse-of-the-writ

issue, the basis of the denial of his habeas petition, is the

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 02-50275
                                 -2-

same as if he had not appealed the judgment.    See Brinkmann

v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748

(5th Cir. 1987).    Accordingly, the appeal is without arguable

merit, and we DENY IFP and DISMISS THE APPEAL AS FRIVOLOUS.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983);

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.