Court Opinion

ID: 3911432
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:40:03.201234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:37.444297
License: Public Domain

This suit originated in justice court, where judgment was entered in favor of appellee. On appeal to county court, judgment was again entered in favor of appellee.
Appellant's first assignment of error is that the case was tried in county court without any pleadings by appellee. Appellant called this omission to the attention of the trial judge by special exception. This exception was overruled, and the bill of exception reserving this point contains this statement:
"There were no notations on the transcript showing any pleadings in justice court, and there were no pleadings filed by the plaintiff or stated by him orally in the county court as required by law."
This ruling by the court was error.
"In the justice court pleadings are as essential to make an issue as in the district court." Alvis v. John G. Harris Hardware  Furniture Co.,218 S.W. 538.
We also sustain the assignment that the verdict of the jury was not supported by the evidence. The appellee testified that his horse traveled 200 or 300 yards from where it was struck "on the railroad," but there was no testimony to the effect that this railroad near which the horse was found dead belonged to appellant. In fact, we find no reference to appellant in any of the testimony.
For the errors discussed, this cause is reversed, and remanded for a new trial.