Court Opinion

ID: 999254
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:23:00.873511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:11.029320
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7276

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-66-N)

Submitted:   July 6, 1999                  Decided:    July 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.

R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial.   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Keating, No. CR-93-66-N (E.D. Va Aug. 7, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2