Court Opinion

ID: 9938688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:03:46.041718+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:20.048241
License: Public Domain

I concur in the result. I agree with that part of the opinion reversing the judgment on the erroneous admission into evidence of Plaintiff's Exhibit 16. I disagree, however, with the Court's holding as to Plaintiff's Exhibit 11. Apparently, the trial court overruled Defendants' objection to Exhibit 11 not on the basis of any of the recognized exceptions to the general rule prohibiting proof of subsequent repairs or procedures, but because the Defendants' counsel had made relevancy an issue by his opening statement. In this, I think the trial judge was correct. As to the remaining issues raised by Appellants, and not addressed in the opinion, I find no error.