Court Opinion

ID: 7208690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 17:19:46.542763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:45.176374
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument, see United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam), we grant appellee’s motion for summary affirmance, see Brewster v. Shasta County, 275 F.3d 803 (9th Cir.2001); Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729 (9th Cir. 2001).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.