Court Opinion

ID: 1007926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:32:30.007402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:55.818832
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6582

CARLOS EUGENE KIPP,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-102-2)

Submitted:   June 20, 2002                 Decided:   June 27, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Eugene Kipp, Appellant Pro Se.    Daynus Jividen, Charles
Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Carlos Eugene Kipp seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court.     Kipp v. West Virginia Dep’t of

Corrections, No. CA-99-102-2 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2