Court Opinion

ID: 5098545
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 19:50:55.679071+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:55.001517
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Movant Daniel W. Loehr (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts the trial court erred in failing to render findings on his challenge to the state’s breach of the jury-waiver agreement. Movant also asserts the trial court erred in failing to grant an evidentiary hearing on the state’s breach of the jury-waiver agreement. Finally, movant contends the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing on post-conviction counsel abandonment.
*662We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).