Court Opinion

ID: 1028725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:45:18.941657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:26.489205
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 09-6003

JAMES ARTIS JOHNSON,

                  Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

JEFFREY J. CRUDEN; RUDY E. RENFER,

                  Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03082-BO)

Submitted:    April 16, 2009                 Decided:   April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Artis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            James Artis Johnson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                    We

have     reviewed   the   record    and    find    no    reversible     error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.     Johnson v. Cruden, No. 5:08-ct-03082-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec.

17, 2008).      We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions    are   adequately    presented    in   the    materials

before    the   court   and   argument    would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                     2