Court Opinion

ID: 2958471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 03:03:46.396152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:32:55.554496
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-12-00784-CR

                              Marcus Anthony Perkins, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee

            FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
       NO. C-1-CR-12-216472, HONORABLE BRANDY MUELLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

                 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

               Appellant filed his notice of appeal on November 30, 2012, the clerk’s record was

filed January 2, 2013, and the reporter’s record was filed March 25, 2013. On August 9, after

appellant’s attorney failed to respond to a late-brief notice sent in May, we abated the appeal to the

trial court for a hearing pursuant to rule 38.8. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). On October 3, we

received a supplemental record containing the trial court’s findings in which the court stated that

counsel said he had been unable to speak to appellant but that there was “no indication that

Mr. Perkins wished to abate the appeal, however.” We reinstated the case, and on February 13,

counsel informed us that he had still had no contact from appellant but that he would file a brief on

appellant’s behalf; March 17 was set as the brief deadline. On March 24, we sent counsel another

late-brief notice, asking for a response by April 3. On April 14, counsel called to inform us that he
would be filing a motion for extension of time by April 18. To date, the brief has not been tendered,

and a motion for extension of time has not been filed.

               Because we do not have a trial-court finding that appellant no longer wishes to

prosecute his appeal, we may not proceed to consider the appeal without briefing. See id.

R. 38.8(b)(4) (appellate court “may consider the appeal without briefs” if trial court determines that

appellant “no longer desires to prosecute the appeal”). We thus must abate the appeal once again.

See id. R. 38.8(b)(2) (if brief is not timely filed, appellate court “must order the trial court to

immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal,

whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the

appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations”). The trial court shall hold a

hearing pursuant to rule 38.8 on or before June 2, 2014, and shall determine whether appellant

wishes to abandon his appeal and, if not (or if it is unclear), the date by which counsel will file

appellant’s brief. Should counsel fail to file a brief by that date, we will institute contempt

proceedings against him. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4) (based on trial court’s findings and recommendations,

appellate court “may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant’s rights are protected, including

initiating contempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel”).

               It is ordered May 2, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: May 2, 2014

Do Not Publish

                                                  2