Court Opinion

ID: 9953482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-22 07:13:26.897825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:14.912979
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals

                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-23-00396-CV
                               __________________

                MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant

                                          V.

                    ERIKA NAVARRO-AGUILAR, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 284th District Court
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 22-09-11491-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On December 2, 2023, the trial court signed an order denying Montgomery

County’s plea to the jurisdiction. After Montgomery County perfected an

accelerated appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory order, the trial court granted

the motion for nonsuit of the Real Party in Interest, Erika Navarro-Aguilar, and

dismissed the case in an order that disposed of all claims and all parties.

      On February 21, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that a

supplemental clerk’s record included an order granting the motion for nonsuit and

                                          1
informed the parties that we would dismiss the accelerated appeal unless on or before

March 4, 2024, we received a response explaining why the appeal should not be

dismissed as moot. Montgomery County filed a response in which it agreed the

appeal is moot. Navarro-Aguilar did not object or file a response to the Court’s

suggestion of mootness.

      For the reasons explained above, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
43.2(f).

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 20, 2024
Opinion Delivered March 21, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

                                         2