Court Opinion

ID: 8456376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:04:31.252876+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.374469
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court order requiring Emrit to particularize his employment diserimina*199tion complaint by providing a copy of a right to sue letter. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.