Court Opinion

ID: 7271509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:28:54.095663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:46.891931
License: Public Domain

CCA 20081163. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is vacated. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]