Court Opinion

ID: 4259095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-28 19:44:37.988592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:45.797837
License: Public Domain

People v Castillo (2018 NY Slip Op 02184)

People v Castillo

2018 NY Slip Op 02184

Decided on March 28, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 28, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2016-07089
2016-07090

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRichard Castillo, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 3365/14, 7929/14)

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel; Peter Keffer on the memorandum), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Masha Simonova on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), both imposed June 20, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Chambers, 142 AD3d 672), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, BARROS, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court