Court Opinion

ID: 204803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-02-15 18:33:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:45.835950
License: Public Domain

Case: 10-20376 Document: 00511382351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          February 15, 2011
                                     No. 10-20376
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTURO LERMA TENIENTE, also known as Arturo Lerma, also known as
Arturo Lerma-Teniente,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:10-CR-55-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Lerma
Teniente has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).                Teniente has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.          Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-20376 Document: 00511382351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2011

                                No. 10-20376

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

                                     2