Court Opinion

ID: 1007566
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:27:26.213519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:54.171050
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-6006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROHAN WILSON TEAGNE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-98-33, CA-01-530-7)

Submitted:   May 16, 2002                   Decided:   May 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan Wilson Teagne, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rohan Wilson Teagne seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration.    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and

find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Teagne, Nos. CR-98-33; CA-01-530-7

(W.D. Va. July 16, 2001; Oct. 16, 2001).     We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2