Court Opinion

ID: 9675597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:58:46.325418+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:35.785943
License: Public Domain

*861On Motion for Rehearing.
Plaintiff, Gonzalez, by his motion for rehearing, properly objects to our comments about Santos’ admissions that he took or spent some of the money, as well as his failure to appear and defend himself against the misapplication of the funds. Plaintiff correctly argues that these were matters for the jury to interpret, and that we can not substitute our evaluation for the jury’s. Plaintiff also calls our attention to the fact that Santos used the $300.00 to buy a cantina in December, before the date of the bond issued by defendant, but that plaintiff did not discover it until after he and Santos made their contract on December 30. We make these factual corrections, but the record still fails to show, in dollars and cents, how much, if any, Gonzalez misapplied.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.