Court Opinion

ID: 4266027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-20 15:00:50.797158+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:05.952725
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                  WI-FI ONE, LLC,
                     Appellant

                           v.

           BROADCOM CORPORATION,
                  Appellee

    ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
  COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
   AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
     PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
                  Intervenor
            ______________________

                      2015-1945
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-
00602.
                 ______________________

                Decided: April 20, 2018
                ______________________

   DONALD PUCKETT, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort
Worth, TX, for appellant. Also represented by DOUGLAS
AARON CAWLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX; PETER J.
AYERS, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX.
2                          WI-FI ONE, LLC   v. BROADCOM CORP.

   DOMINIC E. MASSA, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, for appellee. Also represented by
KEVIN GOLDMAN, KATIE SAXTON.

    NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for
intervenor.   Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN,
BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FRANCES
LYNCH; JOYCE R. BRANDA, MARK R. FREEMAN, MELISSA N.
PATTERSON, NICHOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Divi-
sion, United States Department of Justice, Washington,
DC.
                ______________________

      Before DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
              REYNA, Circuit Judge, dissents.
PER CURIAM.
    The judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is
                       AFFIRMED
REYNA, Circuit Judge, dissents for the reasons stated in
his dissenting opinion in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom
Corp., No. 2015-1944 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2018).