Court Opinion

ID: 9370560
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-14 01:00:26.915909+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:22.237523
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-20227        Document: 00516644159             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/13/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-20227
                                                                                       FILED
                                                                                February 13, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                          Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Warren D. Brown,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:17-CR-81-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Barksdale, Higginson, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         Challenging the sentence imposed following revocation of his
   supervised release, Warren D. Brown contended on appeal, and the
   Government agreed, that the written judgment needed to be corrected
   because it contained three conditions of supervised release that conflicted

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-20227      Document: 00516644159          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/13/2023

                                    No. 22-20227

   with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence at the revocation
   hearing.
          After briefing concluded, however, Brown filed a 24 January 2023
   letter under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j), informing our court:
   at a hearing the day before, his supervised release was subsequently revoked
   pursuant to a term of supervision he did not contest; and, because the district
   court did not impose an additional term of supervision, he is no longer subject
   to the challenged conditions. Accordingly, as he concedes in his Rule 28(j)
   letter, this appeal is moot. See United States v. Perfecto-Mendoza, 583 F.
   App’x 421, 422 (5th Cir. 2014) (holding moot where “[t]he term of
   supervised release at the heart of [the] appeal [was] revoked, and no new term
   [was] imposed”).
          DISMISSED.

                                         2