Court Opinion

ID: 9809705
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:22:20.578748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:39.338448
License: Public Domain

ORDER DENYING REHEARING
{1 The Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission (Commission) filed for rehearing from this Court's opinion filed on June 80, 2015. "Generally, rehearing is granted: (1) to correct an error or omission; (2) to address an unresolved jurisdictional issue; or (8) to clarify the opinion." Tomahawk Res., Inc. v. Craven, 2005 OK 82, 130 P.3d 222, supp. opinion on reh'g, 1 1 (internal citations omitted). We carefully consider the arguments of the Commission and find no merit warranting a grant of rehearing. The petition for rehearing of Appellee, Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission, is denied,
REIF, C.J. (by separate writing), and KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON (by separate writing), TAYLOR (by separate writing with whom GURICH, J. joins), and GURICH (by separate writing), JJ.
COMBS, V.C.J. (by separate writing), and COLBERT, J.