Court Opinion

ID: 9881130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-29 18:07:25.94915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:16.120054
License: Public Domain

STATE          OF LOUISIANA                   IN       THE                                               NO.      2023       KW      0952
INTEREST               OF    M. A.

                                                                                              SEPTEMBER                29,         2023

In      Re:             M. A.,          applying              for       supervisory             writs,            City       Court          of

                         East       St.       Tammany,              Parish       of    St.     Tammany,           Nos.       22JC3318
                         and     23JC1888.

BEFORE:                 McCLENDON,                 HESTER,          AND     MILLER,          JJ.

             WRIT       NOT      CONSIDERED.                      Counsel failed to comply with Uniform
Rules          of       Louisiana                 Courts          of    Appeal,         Rule         4- 5( C) (     6), (        8), (      9)
and (         10),       by      failing               to    include         copies       of       the                              issue,
                                                                                                          ruling            at
the      pleadings                 on        which          the    ruling        was     founded,             the      petition,             a

copy          of       any     opposition                    or    a    statement            that        no    opposition                 was

filed,             and       the     pertinent                court         minutes.           Moreover,               although             it
is      not        a    violation                 of   the        Uniform Rules,              we     note      counsel              failed
to      include     a copy of the transcript of the proceedings                                                              at          issue
and      a     copy of any exhibits introduced at the hearing.                                                               See         City
of      Baton          Rouge        v.       Plain,           433      So. 2d    710 (       La.),       cert.         denied,             464
U. S.        896,        104       S. Ct.          246,      78     L. Ed. 2d     235 (       1983).           Therefore,                 the
ruling at                issue cannot be                      reviewed.           Supplementation                    of     this         writ
application                   and/ or             an        application           for        rehearing              will          not      be
considered.                      See         Uniform          Rules         of    Louisiana             Courts          of       Appeal,
Rules          2- 18. 7 &               4-   9.         Any        future        filing        on      this         issue           should
include                the     entire              contents            of    this       application,                  the        missing
items         noted          above,           and a copy of this ruling.

                                                                       PMC
                                                                       CHH
                                                                       SMM