Court Opinion

ID: 614740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-10-04 23:25:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:31.036416
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Mary Miller sued her employer for sex
   
   *974
   
  and pregnancy discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the employer.
 

  The district court explained its ruling in a comprehensive Memorandum Opinion dated May 2, 2011, 2011 WL 1655920. The court concluded,
  
   inter alia,
  
  that no similarly-situated employee was treated more favorably than was plaintiff. The court also concluded that, even if a
  
   prima facie
  
  case had been established, the employer brought forth a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to prohibit Miller from working at a particular facility because of her disruptive behavior.
 

  The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
    
    *974
    
   published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.