Court Opinion

ID: 993462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:08:11.772989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:48.007869
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6751

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TOMMY LINDSEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-53-7, CA-96-939-F)

Submitted:   October 21, 1997          Decided:     November 12, 1997

Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United
States Attorney, Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Lindsey, Nos. CR-93-53-7; CA-96-939-F
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2