Court Opinion

ID: 8223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 05:35:24+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:42.921870
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                        _____________________

                             No. 94-50264
                           Summary Calendar
                        _____________________

                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                versus

                        JAIME HELEDORO-RIVERA,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       (USDC No. DR-94-CR-18)
_________________________________________________________________
                          November 28, 1995
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's pro se

motion   entitled   "Modification   of   Sentence   Under   18   U.S.C.   §

3582(b)(2)", which the district court apparently treated as a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.      Appellant argues that his guilty

plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and that his

counsel was ineffective.    We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm the district court's

dismissal of the motion.

     AFFIRMED.

*
     Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that
have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published.