Court Opinion

ID: 8073367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:40:39.569959+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:15.345425
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The justice was authorized to grant the "amendment, but, under the circumstances, he should have imposed the payment of costs as a condition. As the record stood before the amendment, the defendant was bound to be defeated and to be mulcted in costs, for the ground on which the reversal of the former judgment went left no other alternative. 43 Misc. Rep. 393, 87 N. Y. Supp. 474. She should not by an amendment at this late day not only defeat the plaintiffs’ claim, but also escape the payment of the costs already accrued. We cannot, however, entertain this appeal, because the order sought to be reviewed is not appealable, under the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1486, c. 580). Leavitt v. Katzoff, 43 Misc. Rep. 26, 86 N. Y. Supp. 495.
Appeal dismissed, without costs.