Court Opinion

ID: 9697983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:38:45.974826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:37.542776
License: Public Domain

CAPPY, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
As more specifically set forth in my original dissent in this matter, I believe that there are insufficient facts of record to support a finding that the verdict of the jury “shocks one’s sense of justice” or “shocks one’s conscience.” However, I am constrained to agree that the Majority, in its Supplemental Opinion, has now stated the correct standard by which remittitur is to be reviewed. In my view, the error lies with the trial court’s application of that standard to these facts in reaching its conclusion. ■
PAPADAKOS, J., joins in this concurring and dissenting opinion.