Court Opinion

ID: 891914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-05 18:34:25.330655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:27.442906
License: Public Domain

1   This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please
 2   see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
 3   Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated
 4   errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does
 5   not include the filing date.

 6        IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

 7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

 8          Plaintiff-Appellee,

 9 v.                                                                                   NO. 29,289

10 CHRISTOPHER ROYBAL,

11          Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY
13 Drew D. Tatum, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General
15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Nettie M. Griffin, Esq.
18 Portales, NM

19 for Appellant

20                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 KENNEDY, Judge.

22          Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

23 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
1 and the time for doing so has expired.

2       AFFIRMED.

3       IT IS SO ORDERED.

4                                          ___________________________________
5                                          RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
6 WE CONCUR:

7 ___________________________
8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

 9 ___________________________
10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

                                             2