Court Opinion

ID: 9911162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 17:00:49.496107+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:56:24.804255
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13756   Document: 17-1    Date Filed: 12/19/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-13756
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       TARA DUNCAN,
                                                   Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., et al,

                                                          Defendants,

       NCS PEARSON, INC.,

                                                 Defendant-Appellee.

                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13756      Document: 17-1       Date Filed: 12/19/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                       Opinion of the Court                  23-13756

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                     D.C. Docket No. 9:22-cv-80285-AMC
                           ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Tara Duncan appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her
       claims against NCS Pearson, Inc. (“Pearson”). We lack jurisdiction
       to review the order because it is not a final order adjudicating the
       rights and liabilities of all of the parties, as Duncan’s claims against
       the other defendants remain pending in the district court. See 28
       U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244,
       1246 (11th Cir. 2012). Moreover, the district court did not certify
       its order under Rule 54(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.