Court Opinion

ID: 7518623
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:50:38.223183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:30.804167
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court here held that Sections 627.736(1) and 627.737(1) and (2) of the Florida Statutes (1979) are unconstitutional because they violate the “right to redress” clause of Article I, Section 21 of the Florida Constitution.
On the authority of Chapman v. Dillon, 415 So.2d 12 (Fla.1982), we reverse.
This cause is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and BER-ANEK, JJ., concur.