Court Opinion

ID: 2894003
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 22:54:07.249368+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:38.060641
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-05-0284-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL A

                                       MAY 5, 2006

                          ______________________________

                           JOSHUA STOCKER, APPELLANT

                                             V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

                   NO. 15,307-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE
                        _______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

                       ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

       Appellant Joshua Stocker has given notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction

and sentence for the offense of capital murder. The appellate court clerk received and

filed the trial court clerk’s record on September 21, 2005. The trial court reporter’s record

was filed on September 19, 2005.

       This Court has received and granted four extensions from appellant’s counsel to file

the appellant’s brief since November 17, 2005.        By letter dated April 17, 2006, the
appellate clerk reminded counsel for appellant that appellant’s brief was due on April 10,

2006, and that neither the brief nor a motion for a further extension of time had been

received. Counsel for appellant was further advised by such letter that if no response to

the letter was received by April 27, 2006, the appeal would be abated to the trial court for

hearing pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b). Counsel for appellant responded

to that letter by filing a fifth extension of time to file the appellant’s brief.

       Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court. TEX .

R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately

cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine:

       (1)     whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal;
       (2)     if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, then whether appellant
               is indigent, and if not indigent, whether counsel for appellant has
               abandoned the appeal;
       (3)     if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant’s
               present counsel should be replaced; and
       (4)     what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of
               appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal
               if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant
               desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be
               diligently pursued.

If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the

court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar

of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney.

       In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

                                                 2
record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental

reporter’s record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court

no later than June 5, 2006.

                                                 Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                            3