Court Opinion

ID: 997506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:57:38.437918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:05.563032
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CARLOS TREVINO,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CR-94-78-F, CA-98-295-F)

Submitted:   December 17, 1998            Decided:   January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Trevino, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Carlos Trevino seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. We also deny Trevino’s motion for reconsid-

eration. See United States v. Trevino, Nos. CR-94-78-F; CA-98-295-

F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2