Court Opinion

ID: 1012670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:48:25.517761+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:13.737876
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Juan Bedios Ovalle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Ovalle,
  
  No. CR-01-130-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED