Court Opinion

ID: 2771092
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-19 12:24:41.437297+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:46:09.835682
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-14-00304-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                           TYLER, TEXAS

LESLIE RACHELLE DAVIDSON,                          §    APPEAL FROM THE 114TH
APPELLANT

V.                                                 §    JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE                                           §    SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

                                       MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                           PER CURIAM
        Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant
and her counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s
motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
Opinion delivered January 14, 2015.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle, J.

                                            (DO NOT PUBLISH)
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                         JANUARY 14, 2015

                                         NO. 12-14-00304-CR

                               LESLIE RACHELLE DAVIDSON,
                                         Appellant
                                            V.
                                  THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                         Appellee

                                Appeal from the 114th District Court
                         of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-0772-14)

                    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.
                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J. and Hoyle, J.