Court Opinion

ID: 3168288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-08 21:07:04.38033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:02:05.613555
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                              AT KNOXVILLE
                                       January 8, 2016 Session

                                      IN RE AIDEN M., ET AL.

                     Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Cocke County
                  Nos. CU05074, CU05075      Brad Lewis Davidson, Judge

                 No. E2015-01241-COA-R3-PT-FILED-JANUARY 8, 2016

This is an appeal by Amanda P. from an order terminating her parental rights to her two
minor children, Aiden M. and Kaidence M. The order terminating the appellant=s parental
rights was entered on May 5, 2015. The Notice of Appeal was not filed until June 26, 2015,
more than (30) days from the date of entry of the final order. Because the Notice of Appeal
was not timely filed, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

                  Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., AND JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J.

Jessica Sue Sisk, Newport, Tennessee, for the appellant, Amanda P.

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter, and Paul Jordan Scott, Assistant
Attorney General, General Civil Division, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee
Department of Children=s Services.

Jeffery S. Greene, Newport, Tennessee, Guardian Ad Litem.

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION1

      1
          Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:

                 This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may
                 affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum
                 opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a
                 case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated
                 AMEMORANDUM OPINION,@ shall not be published, and shall not be
                 cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
       Counsel for the appellant indicated in her Notice of Appeal that she was not appointed
as appellant=s counsel until after the time for filing an appeal already had lapsed. A review of
the order appointing the attorney who filed the Notice of Appeal confirms that it was not
entered until June 8, 2015. However, the order appointing the appellant=s trial counsel stated
that counsel would represent the appellant in all phases of the case, including any appeals to
this Court, Aunless relieved of [the] appointment in a subsequent order.@ The order
terminating the appellant=s parental rights to her children did not relieve trial counsel of her
obligation to represent the appellant. As such, the appellant was still represented by trial
counsel during the entire thirty-day period for filing an appeal provided by Rule 4(a) of the
Rules of Appellate Procedure. This Court therefore directed the appellant=s counsel to show
cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based upon the
untimely filing of the Notice of Appeal.

        In response to the show cause order, counsel for the appellant sought and obtained a
limited remand from this Court for the purpose of seeking relief from the final order in the
Trial Court pursuant to Rule 60.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. See Burke v. Huntsville
NH Operations LLC, No. E2014-02068-COA-R3-CV, 2015 WL 7720360, * 3 (Tenn. Ct.
App., Eastern Division, Nov. 30, 2015) (A>The only relief that can be granted to a party who
files an untimely notice of appeal must come from the trial court, pursuant to Tennessee Rule
of Civil Procedure 60.=@) (quoting In Re Jayden B.-H., No. E2013-00873-COA-R3-PT, 2013
WL 4505389, *1 (Tenn. Ct. App., Eastern Division, Aug. 21, 2013)); see also Born Again
Church & Christian Outreach Ministries, Inc. v. Myler Church Bldg. Sys. of the Midsouth,
Inc., 266 S.W.3d 421, 425 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007) (noting that a party must seek a remand
from the appellate court following the untimely filing of a notice of appeal in order to
provide the trial court with jurisdiction to consider a Rule 60 motion for relief from the
judgment). Counsel for the appellant filed her Rule 60.02 motion for relief from the final
order on September 11, 2015. The matter was heard by the Trial Court on October 20, 2015.
 The Trial Court denied the Rule 60.02 motion by order entered on October 23, 2015. No
appeal from the denial of the Rule 60.02 motion has been filed. As a result, this Court is
without jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Tenn. R. App. P. 2; Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a); see
also Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004) (AThe thirty-day time limit for filing a
notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil cases.@).

       The appeal is dismissed on grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction. Costs on appeal
are taxed to the appellant, Amanda P., for which execution may issue if necessary.

                                                                  PER CURIAM