Court Opinion

ID: 8605607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 02:53:31.105207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:15.637997
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 25, 2006, be affirmed. Because appellant fails to allege that he has suffered an injury due to the existence of the Secret Service, the district court properly dismissed appellant’s suit for lack of standing. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.