Court Opinion

ID: 9901897
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-22 18:00:52.212429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:41.307046
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                          FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       NOV 22 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MYNOR HUMBERTO ANDRADE,                         No. 22-1620
                                                Agency No.
             Petitioner,                        A073-921-459
 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,

             Respondent.

                     On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                         Board of Immigration Appeals

                           Submitted November 14, 2023**

Before:      SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

      Mynor Humberto Andrade, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We dismiss the petition for review.

      Our jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen or

reconsider proceedings sua sponte is limited to contentions of legal or

constitutional error. See Lona v. Barr, 958 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2020). We

find no legal or constitutional error on the face of the BIA’s decision.

      The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

                                         2                                 22-1620