Court Opinion

ID: 4406235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-06-13 07:49:41.50092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:39.350000
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-89,707-01

                    EX PARTE JOHN DERRECK WILLIAMS, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 10720-A IN THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM YOUNG COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance with the intent to deliver and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.

The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Williams v. State, No. 05-17-00818-CR (Tex.

App.—Dallas Jan. 29, 2018) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to timely convey to the State

that Applicant would accept a plea offer of deferred adjudication probation for five years and

mandatory treatment in a substance abuse felony punishment facility.
                                                                                                      2

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to the above claim. The trial court may use any means set out in

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether (1) the State

offered deferred adjudication probation for five years and mandatory treatment in a substance abuse

felony punishment facility; (2) if so, Applicant conveyed to counsel that he would accept this offer

before it expired; and (3) if so, counsel conveyed Applicant’s acceptance to the State before the offer

expired. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be

requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
                       3

Filed: June 12, 2019
Do not publish