Court Opinion

ID: 6104032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-17 08:16:59.419262+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:41.908566
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                               NOS. WR-93,387-01 & WR-93,387-02

                      EX PARTE MARK EUGENE FULLER, Applicant

                ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
                           CAUSE NOS. 10663-A & 10665-A
                        ST
               IN THE 31 DISTRICT COURT FROM GRAY COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child, sentenced to sixty years’

imprisonment, and indecency with a child, sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. He filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant alleges that counsel was ineffective during the revocation hearing for, among other

things, not allowing him to testify and failing to protect a five year plea bargain agreement which

was reached between the parties. Applicant also contends that he was denied his right to an appeal

because counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true,

might entitle him to relief.   Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Axel, 757
                                                                                                       2

S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to

respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact regarding whether counsel prevented Applicant

from testifying in his own defense and whether a five year plea offer was made and accepted, and

if so, how that deal did not move forward. The trial court shall also make findings of fact and

conclusions of law as to whether Applicant was denied his right to an appeal because trial counsel

failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions

that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: January 12, 2022
Do not publish