Court Opinion

ID: 4462853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-10 17:00:42.860642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:40.417623
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

  CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
                Appellant

                           v.

                  PANDUIT CORP.,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                 2019-1248, 2019-1250
                ______________________

    Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-
01073, IPR2017-01074.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by HANNAH
LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES,
Chicago, IL.

   JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT
GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN
STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT,
Washington, DC.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit
Judges).
             AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2019                /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
     Date                        Peter R. Marksteiner
                                 Clerk of Court