Court Opinion

ID: 4516144
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-13 16:00:28.46818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:43:08.966255
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-12971   Date Filed: 03/13/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-12971
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 1:19−cr−00003−DHB−BKE−1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

CEDRIC DERRELL DAVENPORT,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                            (March 13, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-12971     Date Filed: 03/13/2020   Page: 2 of 2

      Richard Pacheco, appointed counsel for Cedric Davenport in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Davenport’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2