Court Opinion

ID: 8620887
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 08:31:31.767681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:30.464349
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Michael Hanson has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hanson has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Hanson’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Hanson’s motion for the appointment of a new attorney and to set a briefing schedule is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.