Court Opinion

ID: 9683155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:23:35.107207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:20:21.520029
License: Public Domain

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice,
concurring on denial of rehearing en banc.
I write separately in response to Chief Justice Blister's dissent. Notwithstanding Judge Brister’s ruminations about matters outside the appellate record, I agree with his evaluation of events that resulted in consideration and assessment of punitive damages by a misinformed jury. However, there is no claim that the panel’s opinion conflicts with another opinion rendered by this court. The issues raised by appellant for en banc consideration do not amount to “extraordinary circumstances” prerequisite to review en banc. Tex.R.App. 41.2(c). Accordingly, I concur with the majority decision to deny rehearing' en banc.