Court Opinion

ID: 3091504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:02:38.780359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:58.105070
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-12-00639-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JOHN EDWARD DIMAS,                                                        Appellant,

                                          v.

NOE IBARRA PUENTE,                                  Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 370th District Court
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes
                  Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, John Edward Dimas, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by

the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2649-12-G. The

parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have

reached an agreement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request
that this Court dismiss this case without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the

validity of the temporary injunctions in any contempt proceeding.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss

without prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed

without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the validity of the temporary injunctions in

any contempt proceeding. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are

taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

       The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate.             See TEX. R. APP.

P.18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the

mandate immediately.

                                                   PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
29th day of November, 2012.

                                               2