Court Opinion

ID: 8464974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:50:44.970253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.644802
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Shidong Ni, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and review de novo claims of due process violations, Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006). We deny in the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ni’s motion to reopen claiming ineffective assistance of counsel because Ni did not satisfy the requirements set forth in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), and the alleged ineffective assistance is not “obvious and undisputed on the face of the record.” See Reyes, 358 F.3d at 597. It follows that Ni has not shown a due process violation. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.