Court Opinion

ID: 3168364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-11 08:03:09.147637+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:12.465140
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  January 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0500. MELVIN I. TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

      Melvin I. Taylor was convicted of several offenses including rape and incest,
and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. See Taylor v. State, 268 Ga. App. 333
(601 SE2d 815) (2004). Boyd subsequently filed a pro se motion to vacate his
allegedly void sentence, which the trial court denied. Boyd then filed this appeal.
We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate
remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)
(2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be
dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150)
(2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct
a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence
is, in fact, void. See Harper, supra at 217 n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119
(676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to
claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the
sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Thus,
when a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. Jones v.
State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      In his motion, Taylor did not argue that his sentence fell outside the permissible
statutory range; rather, he contended that his indictment process was flawed. This is
not a valid void-sentence claim. See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 493 (1) (659
SE2d 875) (2008). Because Taylor has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim,
this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Roberts, supra.

                                     Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                                                          01/06/2016
                                            Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                            I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                     the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                            Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                     hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                     , Clerk.