Court Opinion

ID: 1007811
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:31:02.097375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:16.474949
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7527

ANTHONY MORALES,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

BOGDEN, Acting Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
01-2440-JFM)

Submitted:   June 6, 2002                  Decided:   June 21, 2002

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Morales, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Anthony Morales appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Morales v. Bogden, No. CA-01-2240-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 29,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2