Court Opinion

ID: 1613227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:56:09.427453+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:03.687038
License: Public Domain

23 So. 3d 848 (2009)
Amanda Lynn SOUTHERLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D09-332.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 11, 2009.
*849 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order revoking Southerland's probation. The trial court had the inherent authority to vacate its prior order which was entered without notice to the State. See State v. Burton, 314 So. 2d 136 (Fla.1975) (trial court had inherent authority to vacate order which was product of fraud, collusion, deceit, or mistake); State v. Brooks, 161 Ariz. 177, 777 P.2d 675 (1989) (trial court had inherent authority to vacate order purporting to terminate probation where order was entered as result of mistake or inadvertence). Furthermore, we see no reason why the trial court could not, as it did in this case, timely correct its acknowledged error where this court could have subsequently done so pursuant to a writ of certiorari. See, e.g., Rho-Sigma, Inc. v. Int'l Control and Measurements, Corp., 691 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (trial court departed from essential requirements of law where it entered discovery order without notice to aggrieved party).
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.