Court Opinion

ID: 7639648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 21:01:39.888707+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:23.622450
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.