Court Opinion

ID: 807478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-08-27 19:14:01+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:41:07.196579
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 12-6951

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)

Submitted:   August 22, 2012                 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Arthur   Bradley  Parham,   Assistant   United States  Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).        We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.           United States v.

Chestnut, No. 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 2012).           We

dispense   with   oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                    2