Court Opinion

ID: 9685227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 14:26:41.420542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:03.382555
License: Public Domain

M. J. Kelly, J.
(concurring in result). This opinion is written subsequent to those of my colleagues.
Both of my brothers agree that the case must be reversed for error in granting accelerated judgment based upon the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131). Since I join in that ruling but am unwilling to go further I believe the law of this case is that the circuit court is reversed, the matter is remanded for further proceedings and there is little doubt that the court on remand will be greatly aided by the continuing flow of decisions coming out of this Court on the constitutionality issues and probably by Supreme Court decision in O’Donnell v State Farm Ins Co, 70 Mich App 487; 245 NW2d 801 (1976), lv *232granted, 397 Mich 848 (1976), Shavers v Attorney General, 65 Mich App 355; 237 NW2d 325 (1975), lv granted 396 Mich 869 (1976).