Court Opinion

ID: 9905027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-28 18:02:43.820575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:25.377301
License: Public Domain

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

                                   Before
                       HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and DALY
                          Appellate Military Judges

                           _________________________

                             UNITED STATES
                                 Appellee

                                         v.

                        Samuel P. ROSBERG
                 Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
                               Appellant

                                No. 202300123

                           _________________________

                          Decided: 28 November 2023

     Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                                 Military Judge:
                               Benjamin A. Robles

   Sentence adjudged 03 March 2023 by a special court-martial convened
   at Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, consisting of a
   military judge sitting alone. 1 Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduc-
   tion to E-1, confinement for 85 days, forfeiture of $1,278.00 pay per
   month for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 2

   1 Appellant was initially sentenced on 18 January 2023, however a post-trial 39(a),

UCMJ, hearing was held to address issues concerning what Appellant pleaded to at
the initial hearing and to correct the amount of forfeitures awarded.
   2 Appellant received 61 days of confinement credit.
              United States v. Rosberg, NMCCA No. 202300123
                            Opinion of the Court

                             For Appellant:
                   Commander Kyle C. Kneese, JAGC, USN

                           _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                           _________________________

PER CURIAM:
     After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case,
we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct
in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. 3
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                  FOR THE COURT:

                                  MARK K. JAMISON
                                  Clerk of Court

   3 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

                                         2