Court Opinion

ID: 8210477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-30 00:00:35.741775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:51.641150
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50133     Document: 00516490156         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/29/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                September 29, 2022
                                  No. 22-50133
                                                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Villasana-Hernandez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 5:20-CR-567-1

   Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Villasana-
   Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villasana-Hernandez has not filed a

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-50133     Document: 00516490156         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/29/2022

                                  No. 22-50133

   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2