Court Opinion

ID: 6759361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:30:01.334745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:33.022291
License: Public Domain

The motion for leave to appeal is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. I and overruled as to Proposition of Law No. II. As so allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 50016) is reversed on authority of State v. Preston (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 64, and the cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for proceedings consistent with this entry.
Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Holmes, J., dissents.
Celebrezze, C.J., not participating.