Court Opinion

ID: 2763953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-12-23 16:07:33.409419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:30:15.829580
License: Public Domain

Having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that
                our intervention is unwarranted at this time.     Id. Thus, while we deny
                petitioner's writ petition, this order should not be construed as precluding
                petitioner from arguing in district court whether real party in interest's
                new complaint was procedurally proper under NRCP 15(d) and NRCP
                25(c).
                              It is so ORDERED.

                Pickering

                cc:      Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge
                         Karl J. Andersen
                         Smith Larsen & Wixom
                         Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT
        OF
      NEVADA
                                                        2
(0) 1.947A