Court Opinion

ID: 9815315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 00:39:23.045399+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:35.649112
License: Public Domain

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
Decided February 27, 1939
BY THE COURT:
This matter is before the court on an application lor rehearing on the ground that the medical testimony was positive and not indefinite and that the case was heard without oral argument. In considering the application the court has re-examined its former decision in this matter and discovers no reason so far as die merits of the case are concerned to grant a rehearing.
One of the grounds for rehearing is that there was no oral argument. We have consistently held that the fact that the case was not orally argued does not furnish a ground for rehearing.
Application denied.
Counsel have submitted an entry which will be approved.
GEIGER & BARNES, JJ, concur.
HORNBECK, PJ, dissents.