Court Opinion

ID: 3192622
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-08 19:02:55.05024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:08.264839
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
ETC.,

               Appellant,

 v.                                                     Case No. 5D15-2928

MICHAEL W. MARTINEZ,
ET AL.,

               Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 1, 2016

Non-Final Appeal from the
Circuit Court for St. Johns
County,
John M. Alexander, Judge.

Nancy M. Wallace, of Akerman LLP,
Tallahassee, William P. Heller, of Akerman
LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Eric M. Levine,
of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for
Appellant.

Allyson B. Currie, of Upchurch, Bailey
and Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, for
Appellee Judas M. Riley-Martinez.

No Appearance for remaining Appellees.

EVANDER, J.

       U.S. Bank National Association, etc. (“the Bank”), appeals the trial court’s denial

 of its motion to set aside an order dismissing its foreclosure action. The trial court
dismissed the Bank’s action because of the failure of its counsel to appear at a case

management conference. In its motion to set aside the dismissal, the Bank asserted

that counsel’s failure to appear was because either the notice for the case management

conference had not been received or, alternatively, the notice had not been calendared.

A supporting affidavit was attached to the motion.          The Bank’s motion was denied

without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse.

       Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.200(c) provides that if a party fails to attend

either a pretrial or case management conference, the court may “dismiss the action,

strike the pleadings, limit proof or witnesses, or take any other appropriate action.”

However, the sanction must be commensurate with the offense. Drakeford v. Barnett

Bank of Tampa, 694 So. 2d 822, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Because dismissal of an

action is “the harshest of all sanctions,” the trial court must explicitly find that the party’s

actions were willful, flagrant, deliberate, or otherwise aggravated.               Perkins v.

Jacksonville Hous. Auth., 175 So. 3d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); see also Petersen &

Hawthorne, P.A. v. EMI Enters., Inc., 115 So. 3d 1064, 1064-65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013);

Fugnole v. Crumbly Bros., Inc., 899 So. 2d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). In the

instant case, no such findings were made. Additionally, the Bank’s motion set forth

prima facie grounds to set aside the dismissal. See Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v.

Brogdon, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D336, D337 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 5, 2016) (reversing trial

court’s dismissal of foreclosure complaint without prejudice, where counsel’s failure to

appear at hearing due to inadvertent secretarial error amounted to excusable neglect

under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)). Accordingly, it was error for the trial

court to summarily deny the Bank’s motion.

                                               2
      REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

                                   3