Court Opinion

ID: 8422632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 22:50:08.130664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:26.196363
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Mark A. Ward seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for sanctions, delineating discovery, and granting the defendant’s motion for a protective order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ward seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED