Court Opinion

ID: 5438180
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 17:57:36.450044+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:55.077215
License: Public Domain

By the Court:
There is evident error in the latter portion of the- sixth instruction given at the request of the prosecution. The jury were told that it was their duty to convict if they should “ he satisfied of the guilt of the defendant to such a moral certainty as would influence the minds of the jury in the important affairs of life.”
The judgment of a reasonable man in the ordinary affairs of life, however important, is influenced and controlled by the preponderance of evidence. Juries are permitted and instructed to apply the same rule to the determination of civil actions involving rights of property only. But in the decision of a criminal case involving life or liberty, something further is required. There must be more than a preponderance of evidence. There must be in the minds of the jury an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge, derived from a comparison and consideration of the evidence. They must be entirely satisfied of the guilt of the accused.
Por the error of this instruction the case must be remanded for a new trial; and we do not deem it necessary to notice the other points made by appellant.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.