Court Opinion

ID: 2905713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:24:21.784034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:11.567278
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-272 CV

____________________

KIMBERLY SCHMIDT, Appellant

V.

MARK LAIR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 284th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 99-10-06301-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION
	On July 20, 2006, the Court notified the parties that the appeal appeared to be
interlocutory because the order did not dispose of all of the claims in controversy.  No
response has been filed.
	The Court finds no final judgment has issued.  Subject to certain statutory exceptions
not applicable in this case, only final judgments are appealable.  Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code Ann. §§ 51.012, 51.014 (Vernon 1997 & Supp. 2006).  Accordingly, we hold the
jurisdiction over this case is still vested in the trial court.  The appeal is dismissed for want
of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.		
 

								____________________________
									HOLLIS HORTON
										Justice

Opinion Delivered September 7, 2006 
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.