Court Opinion

ID: 5731212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:24:42.98327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:53.001866
License: Public Domain

The complaint violates the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act in failing to contain a plain and concise statement of the material facts. Instead it contains a detailed recital of the evidentiary facts upon which, presumably, plaintiff intends to rely. Moreover, the complaint in alleging in its twenty-third paragraph that plaintiff denies liability under its policy upon grounds, “ among others ”, that defendant Paul Hodgkinson was not a resident of the household of the named insured fails to tender an issue which would be determinative of the liabilities between the parties. This does not satisfy the requirements in an action for declaratory judgment (Smith v. Western Union Tel. Co., 276 App. Div. 210, 213, affd. 302 N. Y. 683). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.