Court Opinion

ID: 9393630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-10 19:06:45.904111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:54.518778
License: Public Domain

People v Arjun (2023 NY Slip Op 02532)

People v Arjun

2023 NY Slip Op 02532

Decided on May 10, 2023

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 10, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2019-06975
 (Ind. No. 2026/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vShamdai Arjun, appellant.

Stephen N. Preziosi, New York, NY, for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Amanda Iannuzzi of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 25, 2020 (People v Arjun, 188 AD3d 1235), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 3, 2019.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
LASALLE, P.J., MALTESE, CHRISTOPHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court