Court Opinion

ID: 4152024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-13 15:01:14.862084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:16.483992
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

    EVIDEO OWNERS, MAURO DIDOMENICO,
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE
  SIMILARLY SITUATED, DOUGLAS BUERGER,
CRAIG LINDEN, REALVIRT LLC, PAUL BAROUS,
              Plaintiffs-Appellants

                            v.

                   UNITED STATES,
                   Defendant-Appellee
                 ______________________

                       2016-2149
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00413-LKG, Judge Lydia Kay
Griggsby.
               ______________________

                Decided: March 13, 2017
                ______________________

    PATRICK RICHARD DELANEY, Ditthavong & Steiner,
P.C., Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

    NICOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United
States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued
for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARK R.
FREEMAN, BENJAMIN C. MIZER; NATHAN KELLEY, Office of
2                                     EVIDEO OWNERS   v. US

the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
Alexandria, VA.
                  ______________________

    Before MOORE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    For the reasons articulated in the decision by the
United States Court of Federal Claims, we affirm. We
order Appellants to show cause within fifteen days why
sanctions should not be imposed for a frivolous appeal
pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.
                           AFFIRMED
                             COSTS
      Costs to Appellee.