Court Opinion

ID: 989457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:22.800418+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.869173
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6444

RONALD SMITHERMAN,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NEUSE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-133-5-F)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                   Decided:   June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Smitherman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smitherman v. Neuse Correctional Institute, No. CA-96-133-5-
F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2