Court Opinion

ID: 6286695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 16:48:07.179496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:19.281548
License: Public Domain

Opinion
Per Curiam:
In accordance with Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963), and Commonwealth ex rel. Cunningham v. Maroney, 421 Pa. 157, 218 A. 2d 811 (1966), the order is vacated and the record remanded to the court below with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel on appeal. If the court finds that the right to counsel on appeal was not waived, appellant shall be permitted to appeal nunc pro tunc and counsel shall be appointed to represent appellant in prosecuting that appeal.