Court Opinion

ID: 5000898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 01:17:38.904885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:42.687840
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
MORROW, P. J.
The fact that the record may have been filed in this court more than 90 days after adjournment is not available as a matter of which the appellant can complain. The statement in the motion for rehearing that in the verdict questions Nos. 1 and 2 were not answered “No” is not intelligible, in the absence of some explanatory matter by way of a bill of exceptions. The verdict as found in the record seems perfectly formal. It found the appellant guilty, and assessed against him a punishment of confinement in the penitentiary for one year. The case was tried upon a plea of guilty. The motion for rehearing is overruled.