Court Opinion

ID: 2891495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 21:42:48.451414+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:44.639792
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-05-0343-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 8, 2005

______________________________

KERWIN GIBBS, APPELLANT

V.

ALLSUP’S CONVENIENCE STORES, INC. AND

FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERATED

INSURANCE AN ASSUMED NAME OF FEDERATED MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY AND/OR FEDERATED SERVICES

INSURANCE COMPANY AND DAWN WILLEFORD, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-597,010; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By letter dated October 24, 2005, this Court directed appellant Kerwin Gibbs to pay the required filing fee of $125 by November 3, 2005, before any further action could be taken in this appeal, noting that failure to do so might result in dismissal.  Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing.  
See 
Tex. R. App. P. 5 and 12.1(b).  Although the filing of a notice of appeal invokes this Court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b).  Thus, because the filing fee of $125 remains unpaid, we must dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and with a notice from the Clerk requiring payment of the filing fee within ten days.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Mackey K. Hancock

    	         Justice

being filed.  The Court notified appellant on May 6, 2003, that the brief was past due and that failure to reasonably explain the reasons therefor by May 16, 2003, could result in dismissal.  That deadline has passed without appellant filing a brief, a motion to extend the deadline, or a response of any sort.  

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  
See 
Tex. R. App. P. 
38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Per Curiam