Court Opinion

ID: 4304227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-16 00:00:20.163914+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:54.477796
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-20053      Document: 00514601451         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/15/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-20053                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                    August 15, 2018
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MORRIS BROWN OKOLO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:01-CR-765-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Morris Brown Okolo has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Okolo has not filed a response. Although Okolo remains subject to a term of
supervised release, he has completed the revocation term of imprisonment. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-20053    Document: 00514601451     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/15/2018

                                 No. 17-20053

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R.
42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337,
340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

                                       2