Court Opinion

ID: 989339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:05:35.823763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.549862
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7997

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

BERNARD DUPLESSIS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-51-A)

Submitted:   April 16, 1996           Decided:    May 20, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Duplessis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Duplessis, No. CR-91-51-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2