Court Opinion

ID: 3186212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-16 23:47:10.909093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:19:27.391323
License: Public Domain

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

                                     Decided: February 1, 2016

       S16Y0341. IN THE MATTER OF JAY HARVEY MORREY.

      PER CURIAM.

      This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and

recommendation of special master Matthew Tyler Smith, who recommends

acceptance of the petition for voluntary surrender of license filed by Respondent

Jay Harvey Morrey (State Bar No. 523494) after the issuance of a formal

complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In his petition, Morrey sought to resolve the

formal complaint and another matter raised in a separate grievance.

      Morrey, who was admitted to the Bar in 2002, admits that beginning in

2012 he undertook the representation of various individuals on a contingency

basis but failed to prepare formal retainer agreements, failed to provide the

clients with any writing describing his fees or expenses, and failed to maintain

adequate records regarding his fee agreements. Further, beginning in early

2014, Morrey admits that in multiple cases he appeared in court as the attorney

for a party in a garnishment action, although he had strong suspicions that the
individual he represented was not in fact the actual party to the case and that he

undertook no investigation to dispel his suspicions. Morrey asserts that no

funds were ever released improperly in these garnishment cases and that

opposing counsel brought the identity issues to the court’s attention prior to the

hearings. Morrey admits that, by the above described actions, he has violated

Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5 (c) (1). The maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.1

or 1.3 is disbarment, while the maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.5 (c)

(1) is a public reprimand.

      Morrey, who is currently on administrative suspension for failure to pay

Bar dues and failure to meet continuing legal education requirements, asserts

that the lapses discussed above resulted from his ongoing battle with depression

and certain unspecified personal, emotional issues. Although he states that he

is on the road to recovery, he admits that he is currently unable to devote the

mental and emotional energy necessary to practice law. Therefore, he seeks to

resolve the disciplinary matters by voluntarily surrendering his license to

practice law in the State of Georgia. The State Bar raised no objection to

Morrey’s petition but noted that he has a prior disciplinary history. See In the

Matter of Morrey, 287 Ga. 819 (700 SE2d 382) (2010).

                                        2
      We have reviewed the records and agree to accept Morrey’s petition for

voluntary surrender of his license, which is tantamount to disbarment. See Bar

Rule 4-110 (f). It is hereby ordered that the name of Jay Harvey Morrey be

removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of

Georgia. Morrey is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

      Voluntary surrender of license accepted. All the Justices concur.

                                      3