Court Opinion

ID: 592483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:19.038078
License: Public Domain

977 F.2d 574
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Oscar R. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6576.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 10, 1992Decided:  October 2, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CR-87-42-NN, CA-92-25-4)
Oscar R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
Affirmed.
Before WILKINSON, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Oscar R. Smith appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Smith, Nos.  CR-87-42-NN, CA-92-25-4 (E.D. Va.  May 13, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED