Court Opinion

ID: 6730511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:11:34.604723+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:39.100847
License: Public Domain

MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Although it is stated in the printed record in this case that the record on appeal was filed in this court on 22 November 1971, it was not filed until 28 January 1972. This was after the time for docketing the appeal had expired. However, we treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari, allow it, and consider the matter on its merits.
The motion of the State to dismiss the appeal for failing to serve the case on appeal within the allotted time and for failing to file a brief at the appropriate time is denied.
The record shows that on 24 November 1971 the solicitor accepted service of what the defendant called the case on appeal *276and did not serve a countercase within the allotted time. The State cannot complain.
This court, ex mero motu, directed the Clerk of the Superior Court of Polk County “to certify to this court any and all portions of the record in this case having to do with defendant’s plea of guilty.” This report of the clerk containing a certified copy of the “court records” fails to show any questions asked of or statements volunteered by the defendant with respect to his plea. In Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709 (1969), it is stated that the trial judge should canvass “the matter with the accused to make sure he has a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequence.” The record in the case before us shows that the defendant’s attorney entered the plea for him but fails to show that there was an examination of the defendant by the court or anyone under its direction relating to whether the defendant understood the connotations and consequences of the plea. The volun-tariness of a plea of guilty cannot be presumed from a silent record. State v. Boykin, supra.
The plea of guilty entered herein is vacated, and the defendant is entitled to replead to the charge upon arraignment in the superior court. State v. Harris, 10 N.C. App. 553, 180 S.E. 2d 29 (1971).
Error and remanded.
Judges Morris and Parker concur.