Court Opinion

ID: 6346006
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-02 13:01:43.221761+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:16.137003
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                       ATLANTA,____________________
                                                June 02, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0228. IN THE INTEREST OF A. D., A CHILD.

      Appellants Jesse and Courtenay Boland are A. D.’s foster parents. They appeal
from the juvenile court’s order terminating the parental rights of A. D.’s biological
parents and awarding permanent custody of A. D. to the Department of Family and
Children Services (“DFCS”) to be placed for adoption with a new foster family.
Appellants challenge various aspects of the juvenile court’s ruling with respect to
A. D.’s permanent disposition. However, Appellants lack standing and cannot
maintain this appeal.
      It is well settled that “only a party to the case can appeal from a judgment, or
one who has sought to become a party as by way of intervention and has been denied
the right to do so.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ford v. Reddick, 319 Ga. App.
482, 482-483 (1) (735 SE2d 809) (2012). See also OCGA § 15-11-19 (a). Here, there
is no indication in the record that Appellants were parties to the case below or that
Appellants moved to intervene in the case.
      Nor do Appellants have standing to appeal on the basis that they are
“aggrieved” by the challenged ruling. See Caruthers v. Chan, 354 Ga. App. 826, 827
(1) (841 SE2d 475) (2020) (non-party had standing to challenge judgment because
she was “directly aggrieved by the decision”); In the Interest of J.R.P., 287 Ga. App.
621, 622 (1) (652 SE2d 206) (2007) (“[A] person may only challenge a ruling which
has adversely affected his or her own rights.”) (citations and punctuation omitted).
Appellants were not awarded legal custody or guardianship of A. D., and A. D.’s
placement with Appellants for foster care did not operate to transfer custody from
DFCS to Appellants. See Dept. of Human Servs. v. Duncan, 351 Ga App. 332, 338
(831 SE2d 4) (2019) (Department of Human Services retains legal custody of children
it places in foster homes). Moreover, as foster parents, Appellants do not have a right
either to custody of or to adopt A. D. See Owen v. Watts, 303 Ga. App. 867, 869 (2)
(695 SE2d 62) (2010) (“Georgia law provides no right for foster parents to adopt.”).
      Accordingly, Appellants lack standing to maintain this appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         06/02/2022
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                                Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.