Court Opinion

ID: 8457667
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:44:16.516872+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:05.748568
License: Public Domain

*625Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United, States v. Baker, No. 2:02-cr-00033-RGD-JEB-l (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 19, 2008). We deny Baker’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.