Court Opinion

ID: 4127896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:34:14.283649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:32.465859
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                         GREG        ABBOTT

                                               June 18,2012

The Honorable Jim Jackson                              Opinion No. GA-0951
Chair, Committee on Judiciary and
      Civil Jurisprudence                              Re: Whether a private retail establishment may
Texas House of Representatives                         charge an itemized and disclosed "service fee" on
Post Office Box 2910                                   a consumer transaction (RQ-I036-GA)
Austin, Texas 78768-2910

Dear Representative Jackson:

        You ask whether Texas law permits a private retail establishment, such as a fast food
restaurant, to charge an itemized and disclosed "service fee" in connection with a consumer
purchase. i You provide an example in which the fee, in a fixed amount of 37 cents, is printed on the
customer's receipt as "Svc Fee," and a sign placed on the consumer's side of the cash register states
the following: "37¢ Service Fee on all Sales over $10." Request Letter at 1.

         A provision of the Finance Code prohibits the imposition of a "surcharge on a buyer who
uses a credit card for an extension of credit instead of cash, a check, or a similar means of payment."
TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 339.001(a) (West 2006). You do not suggest that the service fee at issue is
limited to consumers who pay with a credit card. In addition, you do not point us to any provision
of statutory or constitutional law that would prohibit the imposition of an itemized and disclosed
service fee on consumer transactions by a private retail establishment, nor have we found any such
prohibition. Moreover, the Texas Supreme Court has recognized, "[a]s a fundamental matter, [that]
Texas law recognizes and protects a broad freedom of contract." NAFTA Traders, Inc. v. Quinn,
339 S.W.3d 84, 95 (Tex. 2011). If, however, a service fee is not itemized and disclosed to the
consumer in advance of the transaction, the consumer may not be contractually bound to pay the fee.
See Effel v. McGarry, 339 S.W.3d 789, 792 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2011, pet. denied) (stating that
parties to a contract "must assent to the same thing in the same sense at the same time"; their "assent
must comprehend the whole proposition"; and "the agreement must comprise all the terms which
they intend to introduce into it"). See also Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. City of Fort Worth,
22 S.W.3d 831, 846 (Tex. 2000) (providing that "a contract is legally binding only if its terms are
sufficiently definite to enable a court to understand the parties' obligations").

        iLetter from Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Comm. on judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence, to Honorable
Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'y Gen. (Jan. 10,2012), http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").
The Honorable Jim Jackson -: Page 2                  (GA-0951)

        We conclude that no statute or constitutional provision prohibits a private retail establishment
in Texas from charging an itemized and disclosed "service fee" on a consumer transaction, provided
that the fee is not limited to the use of a credit card. If, however, the fee is not itemized and
disclosed to the consumer in advance of the transaction, the consumer may not be contractually
bound to pay it. 2

        2you do not ask, and we do not consider, whether state and local sales taxes must be collected on the "service
fee."
The Honorable Jim Jackson - Page 3             (GA-0951)

                                        SUMMARY

                       No statute or constitutional provision prohibits a private retail
               establishment in Texas from charging an itemized and disclosed
               "service fee" on a consumer transaction, provided that the fee is not
               limited to the use of a credit card. If, however, the fee is not itemized
               and disclosed to the consumer in advance of the transaction, the
               consumer may not be contractually bound to pay it.

                                               Very truly yours,

DANIEL T. HODGE
First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES D. BLACKLOCK
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

JASON BOATRIGHT
Chair, Opinion Committee

Rick Gilpin
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee