Court Opinion

ID: 7757086
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:29:52.709636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:47.499232
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court acted well within its discretion in ruling that the appellant former husband must reimburse the appellee former wife for attorney’s fees expended in compelling compliance with the final judgment and ruling that these fees will come from the former husband’s share of the proceeds of the sale of the parties’ home. See Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697, 700 (Fla.1997); Meloan v. Coverdale, 525 So.2d 935, 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Affirmed.