Court Opinion

ID: 5894044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:57:25.504098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:26.125999
License: Public Domain

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated August 29, 1985, which denied their motion to compel examinations before trial of the municipal defendants and imposed a sanction of $100.
Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed a sanction of $100. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.
The plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 for court-ordered depositions was properly denied because no showing was made of a previous demand for pretrial examinations (see, Wiseman v American Motors Sales Corp., 103 AD2d 230). The sanction, however, cannot be imposed because there is neither *668a statute nor a court rule authorizing its imposition (see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.