Court Opinion

ID: 4175723
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-08 16:15:15.200049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:11.616622
License: Public Domain

Matter of Brianna C. (Raidri C.) (2017 NY Slip Op 04561)

Matter of Brianna C. (Raidri C.)

2017 NY Slip Op 04561

Decided on June 8, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 8, 2017

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

4212 4211

[*1]In re Brianna C., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Raidri C., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.

Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Emma Grunberg of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the child.

Order of fact-finding, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about June 21, 2016, which determined, after a hearing, that respondent mother had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Family Court's finding that the mother neglected the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, as the mother misused drugs and alcohol and refused to participate in any rehabilitation program during the relevant period (see Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B]). The mother's admissions to hospital staff that she smoked marijuana on the weekends, would drink five to six alcohol beverages a day on a regular basis, would "black out" from drinking, would become violent and aggressive when intoxicated to the point of physically attacking other people, and attempted suicide while intoxicated, constituted prima facie evidence of neglect pursuant to Family Court Act § 1046(a)(iii). The mother failed to rebut the statutory presumption of neglect by presenting proof that she was voluntarily and regularly participating in a recognized rehabilitation program (see Family Ct Act § 1046[a][iii]; Matter of Keoni Daquan A. [Brandon W.—April A.], 91 AD3d 414, 415 [1st Dept 2012]). Given the statutory presumption, the agency was not required to establish the child's impairment or risk of impairment (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B]; Keoni Daquan A., 91 AD3d at 415).
Even in the absence of the application of the presumption, the evidence established that the child was at imminent risk of
harm as a result of the mother's untreated mental illness (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B]; Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.], 81 AD3d 37 [1st Dept 2010]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 8, 2017
CLERK