Court Opinion

ID: 9623267
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 06:30:41.389385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:14.199328
License: Public Domain

Goolsby, Judge
(concurring):
*543I concur in the result reached by the majority. On the issue of whether the trial court should have instructed the jury regarding contributory negligence, which is treated in Part II, I would hold there is no evidence to warrant the conclusion that David Dalon was contributorily negligent. I see nothing contributory negligence about Dalon’s leaving the security officer’s presence because, as Golden Lanes argues and the majority points out, “the security officer had matters under control.” If the security officer had matters under control, then it made no difference that Dalon chose to leave the security officer’s presence and went inside the bowling alley.