Court Opinion

ID: 4066306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 22:36:45.015679+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:30.787409
License: Public Domain

\F\\”D”l@”@j

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 007-0396-03

TRIAL COURT WRIT NO. OO7-O396-O3-B

EX PARTE
WILLIE RAY

 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT
"WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS
WITH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT"

MoT\@N DEN\ED
nAnaf%J;kl§»-
BY:___,__.¢._§./..--¢------*--=="=1

M§M§P..&§§

mrs 19 2915

mw@\&@@sia,©@@v%@

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 007~0396-03
TRIAL COURT WRIT NO. 007-0396-03-B

EX PARTE
WILLIE RAY

 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT "WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS"
WITH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, WILLIE RAY, PRO SE MOVANT, IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED AND NUMBERED
CAUSES/ AND WOULD RESPECTFULLY REOUEST LEAVE TO PRESENT HlS "WRIT OF ERROR
CORAM NOBIS" WITH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT; AND WOULD OFFER THE FOLLOWING:

I.
JURISDICTION

THIS COURT HAS THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY TO HEAR AND cONSIDER HIS
IN-STANT'WRI.T PURSUANT TO THE "ALL wRITS ACT 28 U.S.~C. §1651(a)."

II.
STATEMENT OF FACTS

THE SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK RECORDS IDENTIFIES; "THE MOVANT FILED
HIS INSTANT WRIT WITH THE COURT WITH MEMORANDUM AND EXHIBITS MARCH 27/2015
/ [SEE ACCOMPANYING "WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS WITH MEMORANDUM AND ATTACHED EX-

HIBITS].

THE CLERKS RECORDS FURTHER IDENTIFIES THAT THE CLERK OF SMITH COUNTY/
FORWARDED THE WRIT TO THIS "COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS/" APRIL 08/2015/ [SEE

EXHIBIT-l ATTACHMENT]

THE CLERK'S RECORDS FOR THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK/"ABEL ACOSTA"
, IDENTIFIES, JULY 7,2015/ THAT/ "THE ONLY WRIT EVER RECEIVED BY THIS COURT
WAS, 'WRIT NO. WR-61-390-O4'“, AN ART. §11.07 APPLICATION. THAT NO "WRIT OF
CORAM NOBIS," WAS EVER RECEIVED BY THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK AT
ANY TIME BEFORE,OR AFTER APRIL 08,2015 AS ATTACHMENT EXHIBIT-l IDENTIFIES TO
THE MOVANT, THAT THE SMITH COUNTY CLERK/ LOIS ROGERS/ FALSELY PURPORTS ON A

STATE GOVERNMENTAL DOCUMENT.

ARGUMENTS:

THE MOVANT ARGUES THAT, THIS COURT SHOULD CONSTRUE THE SMITH COUNTY CLERK
AS "INENTIONALLY, KNOWINGLY/WILLINGLY OR RECKLESSLY"ATTEMPTING TO MISLEAD
AND CAUSE INJURY TO THE MOVANT BY STATING THAT SHE HAS PERFORMED AN ACT
THAT SHE HAS NO INTENTION ON PERFORMING (FORWARDING THE WRIT TO THE COURT
OF CRIMINAL APPEALS), SO THAT THE MOVANT MAY RECEIVE THE RELIEF HE IS ENTITLED
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE ALL WRITS ACT. AS WELL AS A COMPLETE DISREGARD

FOR HER PUBLIC SERVICE DUTIES AND OATH AS A CLERK/ UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.

THIS HONORABLE COURT SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT/ 'ON JULY 147
2015/ THE MOVANT AS WELL FILED A MOTION TO 7th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OFSMITH
COUNTY, TEXAS (i.e.'A MOTION TO COMPEL THE CLERK TO PERFORM DUTIES AND DELIVER
THE WRIT TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AS SHE INDICATED SHE DID). HOWEVER,
THE 7tH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT REFUSES TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION PRESENTED,
WHICH THE MOVANT' HAS A GOODFAITH REASON TO BELIEVE THE COURT IS ATTEMPTING
TO AID AND ASSIST THE BADFAITH CONDUCT OF THE CLERK, BASED ON THE REASONABLE

FACTS AS DISCLOSED TO THIS COURT HEREIN.

WHEREFORE/ WITH THE FACTS AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED BEING FIRMLY ESTABLISHED
ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD, THE MOVANT "WILLIE RAY" WOULD PRAY AND URGE THIS

2

GRANT HIS INSTANT MOTION IN THEINTERESTTHAT JUSTICE BE SERVED.

~ AND WOULDEURTHERDKNE THIS COURT, "HOLD THE CLERK AND THE DISTRICT COURT IN

CONTEMPT OF THEIR DUTIES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 18 U.S.C.§l§Ol." IN VIOLATION
OF THE "PRESUMPTIONCD`THEIR PUBLIC SERVICE DUTIES AND OATHS/" AND ACCEPT JURIS-

DICTION OF HIS WRIT.

RESPECTFULLY SU T ED
WILLIE RAY #121 91
POWLEDGE UNIT

1400 FM 3452

PALESTINE TX. 75803

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I, WILLIE RAY #1210691, DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE FOREGOING_ MOTION AND
ACCOMPANYING "WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS WITH MEMORANDUM AND EXHIBITS/" HAS BE*
EN SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ON THE FOLLOWING DATE, BY PLACING THE SAME IN THE
INTERNAL MAIL SYSTEM(N?THE TDCJ-CID/POWLEDGE UNIT MAIL:

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX. 12548

CAPITAL STATIONK
AUSTIN TX. 78711

AUGUST 14 , 2015

 

DECLARANT _
WILLlEi RAY #1210691

CC FILE

EXHIBIT~]_

 

smith county oourthouse Lois Roge rs (903) 590-1675

100 N. Broadway, Room 204 _ _ _ Fax (903)590-16613
Tvler, wan 75702 Sm lth Cou nty Dlstrlct Clerk TTY/rDD <903) 535-0675

Apri| 08, 2015

W|LL|E RAY

Powledge Unit #1210691
1400 Fm 3452
Palestine, Texas 75803

Re: Cause No.: 007-0396-03-B
Your Writ of COR|\/| NOB|S has been not-Qrocessed. lt is this day being
forwarded to the Court of Crimi_na| Appea|s in Austin.

This letter should be kept With your records.

Sincere|y,

Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk

By: W;QMQW '

Linda Ruth Rhymes, Deputy

b Tab|e of Contents
WR|T OF CORA|VI NOB|S
EX PARTE: WlLLlE RAY

Vo|ume 1 OF 1
Cause No. 007-0396-03
WR|T NO: 007-0396-03-B

WR|T OF CORAI\/| NOB|S 03-27-15

|ND|CTl\/|ENT 03-06-03 v

JUDGl\/|ENT 09-11-03

PLEA PAPER 09-11-03

LETTER TO DEFENDANT WR|T BE|NG SENT TO CR||\/|lNAL COA 04-08-15
Wl/-\VER OF SERV|CE TO D|STR|CT ATTORNEY 03-27-15 l

REC|EPT FOR COPY OF WR|T TO DlSTRICT ATTORNEY 03-27;15

CR|M|NAL DOCKET SHEET

28

30

32

34

35

36

Application for Writ of CORAM NOBIS
From Smith County

Ex Pane vviLLiE RAY
(Name of Applicant)

7th Judicial District Court

TR|AL COURT WRlT NO. 007-0396-03-3
CLERK'S SUMMARY SHEET

Applicant's Name: W|LLlE RAY
(As reflected on the Judgment)

Offense: AGG ASSAULT CAUSES SB|

(As reflected on the Judgment)

Cause No: 007-0396-03

(As reflected on Judgment)

Plea: Gui|ty

(As reflected on Judgment)

Sentence: 45 Years 00 / Texas Department of Criminal Justice
(Terms if years reflected in Judgment)

Tria| Date: 09/11/03

(Date upon which sentence was imposed)

Judge'$ Name: KERRY L. RUSSELL
(Judge presiding at trial)

Appeal No: 12-12-00420-CR
(lf applicab|e)

Citation to Opinion: MS.W$d M
(lf applicable)

Hearing Held: NO

(Pertaining to the application for writ)

»Findings and Conc|usions Filed:

NONE .
YEs No

Recommendation: NA
(Trial coun's recommendation regarding application for writ of habeas corpus)

Judge's Name: KERRY RussELL

(J udge presiding over habeas proceedings)

NAlV|E OF COUNSEL NONE

(lf Applicant is Represented by Counsel)

 

 

IN 'I_'HE COURT OF` CRIMINAL APPEALS

oF ms 3{;;15)1;19\27 F.., _,, m
STATE _QF'IEXAS sir co:_r\:n,’ roots
v; BY` .`_
. r):.-:eurv
w#,ILLI`E RAY 1

CAUSE NO . 007-0396'-.03

IN THE 7TH JUDIC__IAL DISTRICT ooURT
Fo_R SMITH coUN'IY-,-TEXAS

MOTION EOR LEAVE TO FILE A WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS

WI'I`H MEMORANDUM m SUPPOR'I`
IN THE UNITE_D S'I§TES DISTRIC'].` COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRIC'I`. OF TEXASMER!DIV$STON

TO Tl-l_E`. HONOR`ABLE .JUST_ICES ,OF SAID COURT:

cows Now, w'mI~E RAY_, PRo.-~`S'E MOVAN_T., IN THE ABOVE ENTI'ILED cAUsE,AND
on_Lp _RESPECTFULLY MOVE THIS HONORABLE COURT ALLo_i;frl H`IM To FILE HI_s M_orIoN FoR
w_RIT oF coRAM NoBIs wII'H THE F-EDERAL DIS`TRICI coURT', PURSUANT To THE ALL wRIT_s;

ACT 28 U.S.C.

§1651(@). ma MovANT sEE__if<;s P`ERMISSION IN THE INI'EREST mr ws-
TICE BE PRoPi;RL-Y sERvED IN HI»__s INSTAN'L.T cAsE.

j?!%l/La/£` 23 ,_2015

idee;temle§r

WILLIE RAY #121069

eli_eu
1015 noez§as
pis"z"'f':z('<21`101-
ING UNIT_ED 5111135 v_. MAYER, 235 U. s. 55, 69 ,35 s. ct. 16 ,19- 20, 59 L.Ed.129 (1912)

 

l.

; 555 5150 5551_05:_»:5550552 v; 051_155 515115_5., 548 5;.-3¢1' 327 (515 015.
2008). 155 5511' 15 ALLowED 10 0055501 "5551~5551 1510511-055." 5_55_5_1;
v. :0_5;11555_1_5155, 475 F..zd 125 (.515 cir. 1973>... 15 155 MQRGAN 0555
155 .00551 5510, "155 01515-101 00051 555 155 _PowE_R UNDER 155 515 wR-'
115 501 28 U..5f.0.. §1651(a), 10 155-115 A `5-511 05 55505 coRAM N0515- 10
vAc-ATE 150055515. 05 155 050550 1551 155 DEFENDANT 550 5555 DEPRIVED
05 0,005551'." 51150_005 1515 5511 15 AN EXTRAORDINARY 55551)1‘ [AvA1-LAB-
15] 0511 UND'ER 015-00551.55055 0051>511-150 5005 AcTI-oN 10 505_15'\/5 1055
110,-"5;.‘4 <341 U`._5». 51 5.11>... 1115 0150_1`15-51550'5-5 11555` IN 1115 MOVANT;S
0555 55051.0 0014555 1115 1~5555-505 05 1515 11511.

l 1115 5511 15- AN 5")<:0'5’51)1`5011 "555505 551151)1," APPROPRIA15 oNLY 5555 "'15555 111-
1515 55015 55105 15 1505 1<5055 10 155 00551 15105 10_155 55511105 05 155 1000-
55111, 5001.0 HAVE 555v55150 115 5551)11105,. AND 1151<5, 1550005 50 5501.105505 05
FAULT 05 1115'0515555515 555 501 55000111 5055551) 555055 1115 555511105 05 155

T`l?-"RROR_‘S O.F FUNDNENI`AL UARAC»'_I'ER

`15'5"55 055

"NON-wAIvABLE" FUNDAm\JTALLY DEFECIIVE
"1>5055515 05055 AFF-1DAV1 "

'1_55'05 1110

"NoN_-.wAIvABLE STRUCI`URAL 5550_55" 05 FUNDAMENTAL cHARACIER;_
ACIUAL 05 coNsI'RUcIIvE DENIAL 05 coUNSEL
"'05111051 51A055 05 155 PROCEEDINGS-,~" AND 05
015501 APPEAL

2

STATM:'I`QT oF <:ASE

THIS IS A wRIT oF coRAM NOBIS BROUGHI BY A sT'A`TE P`RISONBR .IN cUSTODY, HE
BRINGS mrs wR-IT cHAlLENGING ERROR/DEFEC_I GF- THE Mos'r FUNDAMENTALIST oF NATURE-,
'CHALLE\IGING THE sUBJjEcr-MAIIER JURI~S`DICTION AND JURISDICI'I_ON OVER HIS PERSON,, D`UE
Ir> A NoNawAn/_'ABLE- "SU`B$TANTIVE DEFECI" IN ma PROBABLE cAUSE AFF_IDAVIT 0'F THE AL-
LEQED'\'IICTI`M ,IN IHIS cAsE,. THAT coNcEEDS No JURISD;GIION UNDER moss LAw, AND cAN-
NOJ: B:~: wAIVED 0R FORF_'EIIED UNDER T'Ex-AS lA`w, FOR THE FAILURE '£0. BRING THE DEEECI-' .'
;N 'I_HE' AFFI'DAVIT Tb THE TRIAL GOURT"s AITENTION'. ma MOVA_N_T LN TH`IS wRIT onLD,
RE_S'PECFFULLY INcoRPORATE HIs INEFFECTIVE AssI_s_‘»rANcE of TRJ`;AL AND APPELLATE coUN'-»
S`EL-'s mo IssuE oNE .FOR- m commch oF THIS :REVIEWING coUR:r.

ISSUE ONE

"NoN~wAIvABLE"' FUNDAMENTAL DEFECIIVE
"PRQBABLE cAusE AFEIDAv-IT"

FEDERAL QUESTION_S»:~

1) Dm'ima PROBABLE cAUsE AFFIDAVIT coNsTRUcn:D AGAINST THE
DEFENDANT FAI-L m PURPORT oN ITS FA;:E A "NOTARY sEAL"' To
SUPPORT SPECLAL APPEARANCE OF- THE SUBJECr-MATFER (F-Acrs_)
OFF.ENSE;?

_`2)_ ABSENT THE AFFIANTS PERSONAL_LY APPEARI`N`G BEFORE A NUIARY
AND BEING DULY' sw'<)RN UPON QATH AND s`IGNA'rURE, "Is IT A
'suBsrANrIvE nEFEcr' mm <;_AN NEVER BE wAIVED BY FAILING
To BRING 10 THE TRIAL coUR"r'S AITENTION?"AND

3). ABSEN_J; THE NOTARY sFAL MAl<-ING .'LHE mem LEGAL, "DID
I_HE SIATE oR' THE coURT'S (GRAND JURY AN_D TBLAL) HAVE` THE
POWER, AUIHOR`HY QR JUR‘ISDICHON To P`ROCEED AGAINST THE
DEFENDANI~, ABSENT A P.ROBABLE <:AUSE AFFIDAVI.T?- I_N A_D_DI'_.

I'I_oN;

4) wAs THE DEFENDANT AGIUALLY oR GONSIRUCIIVE:LY DENIED coU'N-¢
sF.L AT cRITIcAL _PRETRIAL SUPPRESSION HEAR-ING,'AND APPELL;:
A'IE' OOUNSEL wHEN APPH,LA'U~: GOUNSEL FILED A FRIVOLDU_S A_P-
PELLANT'S BR‘IEF? (_ISSUE INCORPOBA_TED mm IS_SU`E oN`E).

T_H_E M'C`)`vAN_T ANSWERS THE ABOVE QUESTIONS v11.-4.1’,130VE; 1) YES; 2~) YES; 3) No;» y
AND 4) YES, AS A FACIUAL:MA'ITER- AND A mm oF LAw., AND onLD sU_;'=Pc)_Rj§ THE
ABGVF. wm THE munme "FAcIS' F:n~n)mc;s AND coNcLUSIo_NS oF Lsz

. HROUGH No FAULT oR NEGL_IGEN@E 0§‘ m Mc)\"zANr's~, BUT wm 0F THE S"J:ATE Gov-
ERNMH\TTS (SMITH coUNTY PROSECUPORS GFFICE), THROUGH THE APPomM:NT QF cOUNSE;L
To THE DEFENDANT, wHo 'wAs cl-;EARLY H~IE,FFECTIVE, 'W.A$ THE DEFENDANT ABLE 10 BR-ING
ALL THE FA<-:ljs RA_;_stD I_N H_I,S IS.SUES' oN_E AND mo, To THE TRIAL ooLm"s 0R APPELL-
ATE_ GQURT’_S ATI‘I'EN`TION_ PRloR m THE RENDITION. op THE JUDGMBNTS', i.e. THE sTA-
TE' BE~ING IMPUIED mm THE.RESPONSIBILHY oF THE INEEFECFIVH\:ESS oF coUNsm.'~s A_T
IRIAL AND 0N F_IRST APPEAL, uNDER IHE FOURTEEN_TH AMENDME:NT`S tro m UNITED sums
coNS-rlrli_r_lc)_'m, ljs A SIATE cREATED MEDIMENT. cUYLER v. SUILIVAN, 466 U.s. 335.

WH'ILE ms sIATE comm MAY BE GCRRE_<:I THA.'£, "TI_HE MOVANT <:AN 0N_LY FILE GNE
HABEAS PEHTION A-TIACKING HIS c'oNvlcTI_o_N, x__'r FAILS To TAI'<'E IN'LO AcooUNT mr RE»
LIEF Is' AvAlmm UN_DER THE AL_L mrs A_cT 23 U,;S;.-C}~. §‘165'1(a) (1982). IT rs wELL
ESFABLIS_HED T_HA_T BY VIR_IUE 0F `I`HE: ALLL wRITs Acr, THE wRIT oFv coRAM NOBIS is
AVAILABLE wITH RESPECI. m ’_JUDGMENTS' 'IN cRIMINAL MA'ITERS." SEEv MORGAN,-SUPRA.
fld., AT p.l, THIS Doc]. '

HERE MOVANI (RAY) Ess§m‘lALLY 'SUGGESTS mm HIS .TRIAL coUNSEL’s PERFORMANCE
AT cR`m':'mAL sTAGEs- oF THE PROCEF.DLNGS, wAs' so DEFICIENT_,(_. spain sums wEREANn AR'E "SUBSTANJ?IVELY DEFECI'IVE" As A MA_TTER oF m-
AS lAw, FOR THE wAN'r oF A SHOWING O_F A NOTARY SFAL. (ia.e. EAC_LALLY voI`D IN--
Smmms). MOVANT (RAY> mm `SU.G_GESTS, IHAT HIS APPELLAI§E coUN'S`EL's PERFORMAN.-
on wAs As wE:L_L cowST`irUIIONAu-.YDEFICIENT m HI_S _FAILnRE To RAISE THE "sUBSTAN.-_
TIVE DEFE<:`TS' m THE AFFIDAVHS ("\'S.T;A'rmu~r_rs"), B'UT kamm- FILING A FRIvol_._ous A'P~
PE_:LIANT'S BRIEF, coNSTITnI.ING, No'r 'MER_E I`NEFFRECTIVEI\IESS~, BUT RAum_a, AGTUAL 0R
GONSTRUCTIVE vnuNuaL oF c_jc)UNS'E:c;a AT FIRST APPEAL, AND Is -As wE_LL m'P'UJ:En 'ro THE
sTA'u_as_ RE`sP<`)'Ns"I"B-'u.m uNDER THE FOURTEEMH AM§NDMENF cmaER, suPRA. [Id., Ar'r p_.
3, mrs noc..]. THE sTAIu, 'LHEREFQP;_E, BY 'IHE APPOINum oF coUNSEL's (IRIA`L AND
APPEAL) H_As UL_TMT_EL_Y QAUSED um PRocEnURAL EXIMUST_LON BEQUIRH~IENT ERRoR, To
BRI`NG To THE TRIAL coURT'S AND APPELLATE oomzjr'S ATIENTION, BY Tm:lR FAILUR£__S ',ro
PRES_ERVE. ute ISSUES F.oR THE FEnERAL HABE'AS <:'oRP.US RE\"/Im. muFQRE, BEING um .
THE ERRORS ARF. oF THE Mosr 4FUNDAME:NTAL IN cHARAGFER, mEPt)RE GAUSING ma DEFEND-
'ANT To LosE- RJ:GHIS AND BENEFITS THAT HE womn _HAV'E ourERwIsE BEEN ENTHLED To-,
BUT FOR uu; coUNSEL's INEFFECJ:IVENESS, cAUSING HIM To FORFEISI _H_I`S RLGHT 10 RAISE
ma IssuEs AT AF'EDERAL HABEAS coRP.Us LEVEL 0F ura APPELLATE PRoCEss, FoR THE LA<:L<
oF mmUSTION A_T Ein=a'Y AVAH.ABE: vsTATI~: RuvIEDY. AS SUCH, THE MOVANT IN THIS PARIICU-
lAR cAsE SHOU`I'.D NOT BE BARRED ~FROM THE `F`ILI'NG oF IHIS DCI'RAORDINARY 'wRI`T, DUE 10
THE STAua cREAIED MEDIMENT UND.ER 'IHE oo`lamN;:.DochNE SEE cQL_EP/lAN \_r,_ _IHQMPSON,
501 U.s. 735. cQUnTING MU;§RAY\; QARRIER, 477 U.s'. 478,488 Sa-c':t. 2639 (1986)(THE
GovERNMmTAL INTERFERENCE o'a'? "-SUPPLYING THE MOVANT (DEFEN'DANT) wm couNSEL"s
THAT wm coNS'-II_I'LJ'ITIQNALLY IN_EFFE<:HVE,"- MADE anomach mm ma coNFEbQER_ON-
tons GBJE£:I_ION AND EXHAUSTION RULES MRAQI_ICABLE F.oR THE MovANT To EUAU$T H`IS
STATE Ru~unlm).. Hls -APPELLAIE CoUN`SEL's FILING oF uIE'FRJ_'Vou)US APé`El-aLANT's BRI-
EF` oN DIRECT APPFA_L INSTEAD oF RALSmG mg CLEAR sUBS'rANrIvaa DEFEcrs, ULTmA'rE:LY
cAusEn THE AFFIRMING oF A coN\'_/Ic'T_IoN THAT womn usz oufE:RwIsE BEE`:`N oVERTURNEn.

5

BY was oouwswr.‘s wmawa To wAl_sw uaw CaawARLY owvaous DwAn-BANG waNNING Iss'a'aws
uaAT uaw MCVANT RAI-sw's `a_awww;u\_a,('a_awwA_USw a_`T as chAw 0N uaw FAcw o_F uaw Rw'co__wa)
aaswaaw uaAT uaw sTATw»awNTs saaPPoaaa: No APPwARANcw oaa uaw vacaaa~a, aaauawss oaa uaw
sTAww, BEFORE ANY PRoCI-:EDINGS) sww anMwARD y‘.__a_'aaaAUGaa,' 868 F`.`zdaza?§ (Sch cir~...19
89')`(w_aawa'a amusij Fuws A. wwavoaaous APPwa.aAaES BRI.EF, IT AMOUNTs m No coUNswL 'AT
ALL, wauaww AquAa. c)Rl CoNsawa_ac_a-_a“avw nwaauaa. o`a‘ oouwswa., AND uaw waaaaa_)acw PRON`G

oF uaw smacawwaua)_acw PRO'NG OF uaw srwacaaaAND Twsa‘ <466
U.s. 687-88> .aN.Rwawwwaac._w wo 'a'a_a's awaAL_coUN`swL.'-s INcoaaPauwaars oaa a<_;_aaowaaaacw ow
uaw FAcas Aca_n uaw LAa_a_s TH'AT APjPa-.awn un uaw MOVANT"S CASE_ IHAT womn aaAvw wNaIT-
Lwn aaua ao aawaaa'ww. aaA`n was T_wuaa. couNswL Mwwwaaaa wwva'wwwa) uaw aawaa)aLY AvAquL'w
“-sTA~'aj‘_w»auaTs" nw uaw vacra'aa AND uaw wafaijss-, aaa QUw`sTaoN, AND APPLIwn uaw AP_PL_I-
koa.w.sTATuwws_ AND Avuagw~mws- To ~sU'caa As uaw MovANa news aawwwua, w_Y umwch
ow uaw F_Ac~_auAL suwsaANwavw. nwwwc'a‘s, AND wwoucaar saacaa ao uaw ua`aAa. couwa"s‘ AND
APa>wa;LA'aw GQURT's ATIwa~aTaoN Pwaow' ao uaw wuaua"a*aoaa ow uaw Juncaawaa's ANnMoku
uaw couwa'.s u) nasaaass 0R QUASH THE A`ww`a`nAvaTs AND uaw chwa;aNca lunacuawa~aa: sw-
cuww wwoM uaw a_aaa`Qwa~aATanN awiuaw sums (`"Uvawm_wa) u) B'Y A NOIARY")', Mov-
` ING uaw co'UwT'-s ua nuaass 'ALL caaARGws ATA suPPRwS_SaoN aawawuac~, (uaaaw was Nwa_rww
CoNDUca'wn Now wAs A PRoBABa._w cAU_s_`w aawAw'aNe, AND MovaNG uaw 00an u) vAcAa'w uaw
CHch;ws wow wANa ow uaw A_PPEARAN_CE ow uaw squwcaa-.MA_aTww Jaaa'aasnacraow AND/oaa
JUwasDacraoN oVER THE DEFwanANa"s wasoNa, wow uaw wANa' oaa uaw suarwaan Pwoa
vanwn waua A; VALID PRO`BABLE cAUsw AFwaa)A\/'IT UNnER`/ow- PaawsaaANT ua wa. conw caa.ua.
PRO.‘. Aw'-a‘. §,_2_1`. 22 AND §;a,~O_e_, No'r wwaNG swoRN an BE_FO_RE_ A NUIARY P.UwsuANT u) wa.
Govr. coa)w §312-;.011(:1). (vwwNoN 1___998), uaw 00an 13me woan auwa was Puwaaa'c -sww-
vacw DUTY' AND o_Aua~, wadman aaAvw, As A "'MATa'waa ow LAw'»'., Bwau 130an To nasMass ALL
oaaAaaGws oaa wwwN aN wwaz_ow wmswaaw, wow Nc`aa Aca_aNG U'PON uaw sTATws "PRosEcUmR_aAL
FwAaaa)w"" PaAaaaa.Y wxa>oswa) oaa-uaw wAc`w- ow uaw wwco`wa),' nUw `u) uaw mcf uaAT uaw uN-
' ' 6

NoaAaaazwn ~s'aATwaNas`, auwa TwaaAs` ALw -Q`oa\acwa)_wn a\_ao aaawasnacaaoNAaa waGw-a`s UPON uaw
sa‘ATw u) Pwo_cwwn AGA-aa`~asa uaw aMovAa\aT'. JURasnacaaoa\a "CAN 0NLY ww aNVoaaawAL aAw)`... uawww wAs No oa.=wRAaa<)N ow uaw Paaocwa)-
URAL LAws aaa uaas cAsw, waawaa uaw smaw\awa'as nan Noa' wva Mwwa uaw wsswaaaaAL wa-
RwQUasau:s 0F uaw waAs PRocwDURAL aAw oa‘ uaw awas saAuaaw §§az.oaa(a)(waNQN
1»993). aawaaw aaa uaw aaovAN_'as cAsw, uaw suaaw- vaww a'aAD uaw LAwFUL Aa`auataaaa"a'a Poss-
E.saswn BY was owwacw 0F uaawGR-aua u) nwa.avwaa-, PASS oaa Oaaawwwasw UI'I'ER A "SmUaAT-

I`NG LEGAL PROCFSS" IN V]'.OLATION OF. CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW OF 'l_`EX PEN. CODE SEC.

§'3_2.¢8 (wa_ua oaa wwaajaoaaa AN QwacaaaQaa Bw'aNG aaA_aswn wY uaw 'n'wwwaasw couaaswa., AND
nwwwc`a cANNaaa aaw-_aaAavw'a), chAusw' a"‘a cAuswn uaw GwANn umw coaawa AND uaw uaaAa.
a couwa u) ww manuean ao 'aAaosww_a_)
A<;Aaa\asa uaw MovAN'a wow ANY cwuaaNAL Puwa>osw. As sucaa, As A "FAC'RLAL AN_n awch 1 -
maawaa, umw as wo vAa'aa) umcaawaaa: <-.a.e. uaw mm as aauaa. aaw_a) voa_D>-, aaaoaajaawG No FAcaas ug APP`wAw wwa="oaaw A GRAND J`URY oaa AN`Y cauaww 00URT, sUP-
»Pa'a_owawa~.w- cA_a'asw u)_ no so.
a.e., wmaan uaw LAaawua. AUaaat)`waTa` AND oaa -wwa.`aww ua`Aa uaw _s'aAa'wGokuNMwwa coul,n
' .waaaw<; Awoua A "Jaasa Rwsuaaa (oowvaca‘aoaa oaa JUDQaENT`)""` oaa uaw wAsas' nw uaw "sa_M-
ULA'aaNG awGAL Pwo'cwss." sww wxaao waaw<_;jawa_c c_o_. a:a_nv. gfa;wwao-,- 142 s~.w;. 3d AT 3_0;7.
uaw coaaaaa aawa.ag aaa DAaasagaa-Aaas'raw,- uaA__a, AN Uaavwwaw`a`wn APa='wAwANcw news Noaa "coN-
CEDE JURasa)ac-.'raoaaa" <968 s.w.zd 319-,-322 ('a'wx. 1.998). uaw sua>ww~'aw.~couw:r aaaaNa oaa
"a‘o aaoLn aaa uaw coram cAsw uaAa, "'nwa'wcas aaa sUBchr-MA'I-T-ww Jaawasaaawaaow, cAN 'Nw-
vwaa Bw wAavwn oaa woaawwaawag; wa_wca‘s waanw coaawwa;'a_ao_aa aawGARangss waawuaww RAaswn
IN nasawaca coUwa_." sww__ aaa\a_aaw_ag sa;Aa_ws v <_:Qa_"aagw, 535 aa.s. 625,63_0 (2002).; As wwa.a.
, saNcw Awsw_swwc_wa JaaR-asa)acaa°"`a'oa`a wawavws A GOURT OF a'a`s Poaaww ao .Pwocwwa) To Aagau~

 

 

DICAIE THE RIGHI"_S CF THE PARTIES, _IS A FUNDAMENTAL DEFECT IN NA'»IURE` AND CAN BE
RAI'S}E`.Dl A'I` "ANY PLACE AND AT ANY TM." GONZALES, 545 U.S. AT 528 (ZOOS)(CI'I`ING
Sg'I'EEL CO. v-. CI'I`IZENS FOR A BEITER ENVIRONIVIE;[\IT, 523 U.S. 83,94,101,'118 S‘.Ct. 10

 

03 (1_99'8); Fowauaoa v~. .saATw-, 932 -s._w~'.-;fzd 185. Acoownaa\ac; ao uawsoN-Ausaua, sUPaaA.
, saAan..Fow uaw Pwocwa)URAL RULw, uaAT JURIDICI'ION CAN QNLY BE owTAu_a"wD' uawoaac`aa
uaw PRQBA_BLE wA_Usw AFFaDAViT, CaaARGa`N'G AN owwwN`sw, AND FAaanw nw uaw sa'Aa'w u)

oBTA~aN saacaa AND uaw uaw agwaz'wNDANa ANYwAaas as 'a-'a=wwnn 0N uaw can_aT‘s", AN_a_g uaw ag'w-
s

F'HaDANT cAa\aa\ac'a ww aawa.n wwsPONsaBa.w Uanw uaw nuw~ nuacuacw wua.w wow uaw sTAaij
"FROSECUu)waAL a=aaAUnS-' 0N uaw COUR"I',S,, FOR_ uaw wmst _FAILwa ao Anaawaaw T`o las
owN Pwocwn_uwAa_, wnL_w__s 0F uaw MANDATORY wawaUasaaws ao A aaALan J'Uwasnacaaoaa ow
A vALan sa'TAwaNa. VaoLATaoN »0w- uaw saAaws"P_RncwnUwAL waaLw wY uaw saATw woman
Bw A s`TA"aw CRwATwn aaannaMwaa'a Uanw uaw occuan 0F cnawaaAN 501 U. s AT 750.
uaw eoa.wa~maa nocawuaw, auswa_s ua_A_T uaas arwnwwAL 001-ma cavws Paaoa>ww Rwstca an
uaas sTAaw PRocwnamAL RuLw-, uaAT aa&)`a'aa.n ww NoN-wAavAwaw ANn vaww wowww-aawn.
Ga.ovww va _cAa'N, 128 F.3. ' …

AN AwwanAvIT as nwwaa\awn As A "s'aAa.'wwwNT ww.uAcT Ow FAcTs"-, suaan BY uaw wasoN
MAa221
F.3d 711 (5111 011. 2000), 055_'1. 0151»1'0, 531 U.5.1131 (2001)..1115 FUNDAMENTAL
MISCARRIAGE 05 J1151_105-_. 15 0011511\11_0 10 0A555 111155"5 1115 DEFENDANT CAN MAKE 'A FAc-'
1110 5110111110 1511 A_s A 5101110 1111155 115 010 1101 001111111‘ A 0511»15.51151101 v. AN-
055_501\1 185 5 3a 635, 644 (Srh 01;.1999).11555_,11115 00051 550111.0 1111/5 110 01551-
0111.11' 511101'110 1511 1555111 1115 550505 011_155 15510111111551_110 UNNGI‘ARIZED, 15 1101
cI)MPErmT 55005 05 ANY 05mm0 101 0001`15-11110, AND SUPPPOR”LS Nfo APPEARANCES 05
SUBJ501-111115R 551.0_55 ANY 001111.. 511 0011'11115:1-1, 111510111111 001151.1-111__5 1101 05 5550115
111 1510 551 11111155, ERRORS AT- 555'151-_0 521/1055 10 515UR`_5- THAT .“PROB`ABLE 01055 Ex-
151'50 10 550055_0 10 1510 111-.‘11115 0155, 10 5010 111110111111 0501 05551\1_5`5-. M

10

 

11

sTATEs v. MACHANI_G:;, 475 U'.s. 66 _(.1.-'986). 1113 MOVANI ARGUES 315 cAsE mm 3333 if
"'IHERE wAS No PROBABLE cAusE,=ABsENr 1113 UN$w'cf)'R_N A_FFIDAVITS 03 1113 ALIEGE:D v10-
1111 AND 1113 w1111353 GwENDoLYN YOUNG." (.EMPHASIS ADDED). AND IN A.vE_RY REAL sENS'E
, 1113 »$1A13 comm 011 1113 000111 IN 11115' cAsE NEV_P_:_R 3va E)'<`ISTED ABSENr 1113
JU_R_ISD:cTIoN. ANS‘ As' A "'FAcrUAL AND LEQAL 'MATI°ER;," 1113 31313v 1110 110 FAcrs 333033
IT 10 EVEN PRESENT 10 THE Gzz_AND J_URY, AB_`SEN`T 1113 PROBABLE' cAUSE'. THUS MAK_ING 1113
UARGING mSFRUMAN'r FUN,DAMEI\JTALLY N`ULL AND voID 03 ANY POWER 011 AUT_HGRHY 03 JUR'-.
ISDICI'IONA_L vAL_U_E 10 BR,`IN.G ABOUT»ANY mI'RY oF JUD'3003301`305. 1`<_1_11»_11;_11333 v. .30131503, 477 0.5. 36'5,»479.

 

THE MOVANT 330035`13A1 1315 00031 530010 AP_PLY THE PLAIN 3111011 51A303110 10 315
CASE 3313, 1311 133 51A13 AND 133 00031 3333 3013 33010A11.-Y 1130 130311.1 135331
JUR.15010'1103 0v13 315 333503 03 133 503J301-_MATIEK AS DI-SCLOS`ED 13 AN 03530113 10
51A1'311131 03 3A015 As 0331§330 3051 33 03'0'31 ART §21.22 03 133 0003 0113-. 330;.~~,~
A5 APPL_110 03031'_1 133 00`1103 '0A53;~'> £011130 01330, 501=113. ~.

1. 1311 13333 wAs 33103_. 1331 335 01331_1 AND 03v`1005 030311 0033331 mw,
2. 1331 A3330130 133 50351A311v3- 15310315 03 133 MovANr, AND

3. 5331005'11 0303331330 133 3A1113355, 1313031'_£"!' AND REPUl‘ATIoN 03 133
3300311)1305. 533 01330, 507 0;.,5*. 31 7"34,

133*30vA31~A10035 1131 133 5131.3 03v1A130 1303 133 LEGAL 3013 03 110 MANDA-
1011.03 115 3303, A5 AN 355331131 3331300151-13 03 133 133 FROBABLE 0A053 A3310Av-
11 331‘3'0 5_0033 10 3330113 A 301ARY, AND TH_AI ER`ROR I~S .013AR-A30 031/1005-, 33130 'x'
1331 11 15 03 133 1130030 AND 03033 001_13331 LAw_._ 1`3AT 133 51A13 GAVERNM_331 3051 -
A03333 10. 01330, 31 130; 031130 513'1_3_5__\11 11310., 610 3.3<'1 308,4319 0513 011, 20
'10).. 1310 00v1. 00le §131~2.011£1). 15 030311 0013131 133, A PROCEDURAL 3013 1131 .'
. 51330 301 133 1013 1331_.~ 30 3305300.1103 01 3Ac_1_5 0AN 33 0530 30A1351 133 MOVANJ:
ABSE:NT 133 A3310A311 _(51A11143\11).___33-130 3013111230. 313301130~133~ MQVANTS "-5035`11\3-
1103 11031_5,'-' 533 _0_1A30 507 0.5.31 734¢; 10335,, 537 0'.5. 31 394-951;. 031130 51A1-_

35 v:.w DIAZ, 637 3.3<1 592,601-02 (513 cir. 2011).
' 13

114

5411055 10 455551 14 510111 0501111 5550115_- 11 ;4_ 50555_`11055, 501 11511'555'05
MITIGATES 3051501 520 U. .5.v 461, 465 (1997).0011VERSELY. 1115 MOVANT 14500`55 111/41
A "5`1500105141 055501" 145 55501-1`50 11555. 1115 011‘501 -145010 111111 1115- _1155550~:
11151555 01 000151:1._' 5 141 1501 1410 141>1=541, 501014115114111 01055111150 1115 551.114-
B'ILI’IY: AND FAIRNESS 01 1115 114-1141 1110 141111141‘5 1500555 550015110 141 14010111-1'10
REVERSAL. 5111111413 499 0 s. 141 310.(511150010541 555055,11\101055 0515015_ 11

'I_H_E FUNDAMENTAL FRAMEWDRK BY WHIC_H TR_IA_§ COURT S ASSESS GUI§T) HERE~, __I_N THE MO- _

VANT .s: 01455-, 1115 550050 5110115 1111 115 wAS 0015150011\/'51_11 551150 0001551. 141 05111-
641-514055 01 1115 15005501105 (155151_141 1410 APPEHAT'E') , 01 1115 '0001511'5' 1411055
10 5_'1111>11 11v55110115 11155'5005050 5401`5 1410 511.5ANY PREIR'~IAL MOFION_S 05 501155-
55101 11 1111_011 14 0011551`11`\11._ 41105151 .10010 11 1115 B_E_Sl_` INTERIDT` 01 515 1115115'
5005114111v5 5101115, 1411401<110 1115 1741;101~11 05 1115 0150051 10 .AFFIDAVITS (51A15-
MENIS> ADVERSARIALLY 1551110 1115 515111011105 1115 5114155 01455 555055 11 5v11 150-
_ 055050 10 151141-,- 11 555511'5105 10 1115 11.411 555055.11_15 001'51'1400115 0111141 01'00:-
01551' 5 45550150 1115 54151555 AND 111505111 05 1115 511155 1500550110`5 1410 5550'1.1-4
50 11 "55A00 0101 1115 00051' s" 51 1115 511415, 05110 14 51.415 055141_50 1111>50111511,
151011 10010 _55501_1 11 551155 551110 05A1150 10550141_1 101115_ 550.5.011/.1=. 501.5 60
(bj)(3') AND (6). ll'1,.~@.'51¢400 01>_011115v 00051" 1145 10 015- 55145 111111111_101' 01055
11151'50514101\/115015 "1115011\11ALOF 0001551.5111550ANNEV5555115104511AR11-
LESS ERROR, BEC.AUSE I~'I` CASTS 'DO MUCH DO_UB'I`. ON THE PROCESS_ES THEM _S§§VES .. SEE
145150114- v.1'1111111.115 499 0 s-. 279 309 10 (1994), 555 1415`0 5111551111115 v.15145,
456 0. 5 2491,155.-57 (1955) A01UAL 05 0015150011115 051141 05 0001511,15550115_0
105151010.410 v-. 111511-110101_, 466 0.. 5 655 6_92 ('1954) 01`114-1_111411/. 0141.110511.4 356

 

 

 

 

THIS COURT WHERE COUN._S_E§' S PERFORMANCE MAY BE` SO INADEQUA'I§ THAT. IN AEFEEI`., NO
§SSISI`ANGE O_F COUNS§§ §§ PROVIDED. CRONI§, 466 U. S_. 548 (QUOTINQ WAINWR-IGI-H` V.
_S_'IKE§ 433 US.. 7_2. .-,99 97 S. Ct-. 2497)_.; C§EAR§YIN SUCH CASES THE SD('IH AMEI\TUMENT

114

015

'RlGHI lb CCU_NSEL,IS DENIED. wm THE MovANl HERE l_`s, l`NNocENl cANNol BE DEIER~
llle FROM A PROCEEDING wH'IcH A,S‘HERE, DENIAL 0F coUNS'EL A_T c'Rl`TchL PREIRIAL`
STAGES, AND A'l P<)S'r GQNvlc`l'lQN,_ STAGES, HAS MADE ll mPQSSl_BLE lo OONCLUDE wllw A
SAlls_FAclol§Y DE<";'REE- OF cERTlAN'l-¥,~ lHAT THE MovANfr's CASE wAs ADEQUATELY PRESEMED;
s_EE- game v. BRADY~, 316 u,s, 455,478{,62 -s.-ct;.` 1252 (1942).

MOVANr AS mall ARGUES l_HAT Hf'l_s APPEllATE coUNSEL'S PER£QRMANCE» `lN_ Hls FAILURE
..To .RAlsE THE lSSUE_S HERE`IN AT DIRl-:c'l STATE APPEAL/OR- MERE'LY PRESERVE THE lSSUES
(_DEAD-.BANG wlNNERS), coNs'llTUl'Es ACIUAL oR coNSIRUGrlvE DENIAL oF couNsEL_.AND
ES`IABLISHES THE cAUSE FQR H_lS FAI`LURE (mVANT’ So lo BE ABL_E T'o PRESENT THE ISSUES
lN A FEDERAL HAB_EA$ PiEr`lTloN, UNI@$HTB_ .v_. v_cool<,~ 45 F-._3d` 388 (loth cir. 1995);.
BE<;AU`SE 0F mla .APPEl~.lATE cOUNS_EL"-S,FILING OF THE FRlVomUs APPELLANl's BRIEF, AMO-
UNT."s lo coNisU¢llvE 03 AC`IUAL Dll\I_LAL 08 OOUNSF.L Al Fl__RS`T APPEAL, AND THE mg
chE PRON o_F. ma SI'R"ICKLAND TEST. ls _Nol REQUIR`ED. sEE LOM§ARD v.. LYNAUGH_. 868 1=.2¢l

1475 (Sth `Ci'r. .1-9,89). REINSTATEl\'IEI\J'_I` OF _APPEAL IS APPROPRIATE RFMEDY. DUE PROCESS
GUARANI`EES 'IHE MOVANl` THE EI‘FEC'I`IVE ASSISTANCE OF C_OUNS_EL, ON FIRST AFPFAL. EYITI_`~_S

 

v. lUc-‘.EI. 469 U..~s. 387,105' s.,cc. 830 (_1__985);: LOFTON v. leTLEY, 905 F.zd 885 (Sch
Cir'~. 1990).

TRlAL AND APPEllATE coUNs_EL'S FERFORMANCES wERE coNS'Il_lUllONAllY DEFICIENT wHEN
l-HEY FAILI.D THEIR oBLlGAljlc')wa To leEsllGAle (_INSPECI THE READILY AvAllABl.E KE-
coRDs) "UNNGJ?ARIZED AFFIDAVITS_." THAT coNcEDED "'No J`URISDICFION cl THE slAl’E `To
PROSE<;UTE THE oFFENsE."' HERE_.; lN THE M§)vAN_T~"s S~lTUlATlow, IHER.E wAS N.O s'IRATE~
Glc.NE`SS oR TAclchL RF.ASONlNG.lU ovl;R Lool< S_U_cH A "'SUBSTANTIVE. DEFEC'I_." D_UE m 'IHE
FAcl mar ll ls .sucH-A "SUBSIANTIVE~ DEFECI,."' THAT PR`EJUDICE LS _AUll)MATchl.LY PRE=
-SUMI~:D, BECAUSE ll DEPRIVED THE sTA'IE GovERm_b;N'r .0F THE POwER oR AUIHTOR?L_TY 10 Ev-
EN PROCE"ED AGAINST lHE DE:FENDANT.'¢MANDATING A REVERSAL oR- VAQATING oF THE JUDGME:NT
, AND DISMISSAL oF THE INDICMM._AND -cHARGES ALL-T_OGE`IHER. HAD coUNSEL_'s MEREL'Y
`: 15

16

leFsrlGATED m REQ'o_RD (THE UNSwoRN lo .AFFlDAvlTs') 0F THE wllN_Es_SEs THEY onLD
HAVE NCm~:D lms mammals cON'lAl`NED ,N0 NOTARY SEAL,_ AND c;<;)UL'l)l wsz REASONABLY‘ P.Rl_:-.
SENFED THE FA€`~l "l‘0l HE IRIAL coURl AND APPEllA_lE COURT, AND MADE Mollows "00 vA-
C_ATE` A`LLTI'HE cHARGEs FOR wANT 05 vALID l>RoBABLE cAUSE'. THE collar BouN_l") lN lTs mm
NOULD HAVE AuroMAl-chll.Y AvC_AlED- lHE GHARGES AND THE JDQENT, AND THE REsuLTS 0F
THE PROCEEDI_NGS woul.n HAVE GERTAINLY BEE:N _DIFFERM. A's sUc'H__, sur FoR THE .DEFlc_l, .
ENT PERFORMANCE 0F 000NsEl-."S lliE 'RESULIS 0F THE PROCEE:I)INGS mm HAVE HAD A DlF-
F.F.RENT GUTCOME. .A_s SUGH COUN`_SEL'S FAll.URE To{AcHlEVE, A BA.Slc RUDlMANl'ARY UNDER-
slANDlNG 0F line FA<-."'ls AND THE lAw ;IHAT APFLlED lo THE AFF_lDAvlls HERE, l_HEY NEG- .
LECITED IHE CEN"IRAL AND Mosl lMPoRlAN'l PAR'-l 0'Fl THE ADVERSARIAL TEszr;lNc REQUIRED BY
coUNs`EL's lN DEFHQDING m DEFENDAN§J:~'$¢. cAsl: FROM AN UNLAwFUL JuRl__Slecl'loN UNDER
THE Tm,s GOVERNMENT 0008 AND THE 0008. 0F chMlNAL PROCEDURES l'N lwls leTANT cASE
, FAlLlN<; lr) mlRODUCE FAcT AND lAw THAT' woul.D HAVE` P.RODUCED A FACFU_AL SHowl`N`G" ~
THAT THE DEFENDANT wA's Ac__lUAlLY INN0013NT oF THE chM_E ABS‘ENT THE LAwFUL .JURIS+
chrlow (FAclwAllY lNNocll\ll) FoR wAN'r 0F mloA_lclloN ovER. THE DEFEQDANT-'~S PERSON
As wl:_l_l,__. BEcAUsE 08 THE coUNSE‘.-S I~JSAFPREHENSION oF ma LAw, ls A cLsSlc EXAMPLE
oF l'_laE nm‘lcENcY oF' couNsEl.. :lel'_H _v. DREIKE-, 417 F.3d AT 442 (5;h cir-.‘ 2005)(cl'r_.
lNG wll,LlAMs v lAYLQR-.- 529 U.~S. 386~2,120 s.c'n. 1495 (2000). small MISUNDERSTAND,
ING coull) H'A_vE B'EEN coRRECTED wm THE MlN_'mAL AMO_UNT 0F LEGAL RESEARU. YEl, ll
CAN HARDLY BE HELD As DOUBTE_D lHAT TRlAl. AND APPELLATE cOUN`SEL llsz AN OBLlGA--
TIQN lo .leEsTlGAl'E AND UND_ER$ATAND THE FAcrs AND lAw S'URROUNDING ma cASE.j_l__L-__
M, 528 u.s. AT 395,-1_20 sgct. 1495.

BElNG mr THE '~'-suB$lANTll/E DEFEcls"" lN QUESTIQN ARE N0r wAlvER lsSUE.s-, UNDER
TEXAS lAw, OQUNSR cOUll) HAVE REASONABLY USE'D SI'JCH 10 Hls’ com ADVANTAGE lN
THE s~EcUR-'ING THE MOVANT’S INNOCENCE. lllAT lecH ANY REASQNABLE, PROFESSIONAL
OOUNSEL woull) HAVE DONE lN lle BEST INTEREST 0F HTls cllENrS DEFlms;~:-.

16

17

APIENDMT 'I`O THIS WRIT

lssUE m
"OONSTRUCTIVE Amboll\ll“'
10 ma I_NDICIME`NTS GHARGE

FEDERAL QUESTIONS=,

\

1) wAs THE mchle commuchva AMENDED To GQNFORM 10 ms
NEccEsslTl-Es oF ;lHE PROS_ECU'IORS <:ASE,. BY THE QFFERLNG 0F Plz'ooF
SHOwlNGA DlFFERENT PERS<)NS NAM;E: lllEN THE ANME APPEARlN<; 'lN
I-HE GRAND_ JURY~'s GLARGES.?

2) 010 THE slATE co`uRT HAvE mlsplcll_c`)'w' ovl:R THE ("s,UBJEcl-
MATFER")-' "NAME 0F A mm wATsoN'_ As THE 'ALLEG_ED vlclm,`
wm ms l`NchlMENTS cHARGl;_S 02me THE NAME 20 BE A 'PATRICK
loF`r`ls~' wll'H No ALIAS CHARGED ~As 'GRAY wAl?'soN?'"

3`) wAs Movm (RAY_) -ACTAULLY O_R C,DNSIRUCIIVELY' DENIED l'RlAl. 00-
UNS]E_L AND APPEL,lATE couNs_EL BY .lHElR coNsTll'UllowAllY DEFlclENT
PERFORMANCES, wH_E_N THE TRIAL coUNsEL FAl_`LED 10 MovE THE cpuRT
10 QwAsH 'IHE ‘lwplc:lmvl~ AT chTchl. PREIRIAL slAGEs 000 lot THE
8lech sHmNG-`llm A PlAlNTlF_F's- NAME wAs 131me lN THE
EvlmBEr@E2 lHAN .lN ml lNl)l_clMll\r'ls' GHARGES, AND APPEu.AlE coUNSEL
log H'ls FAlLuRE 10 lDENTlFY me elmle lssu'E m THE APPEllAT_Es
BRLEF...

STA_NDARD OF REVIEW:

THE uN~lTEp SlAT_Es SUPRFME QOURT AND m F'lFm cmcull collar 0F AP.PM$ 808 -

"17

18

HAVE 0008181AN1LY 1181__0 111818 001‘181800'1‘11_78»8_1811011011 0000888 1088 1118 81A18
001/8881»181\11 08 00081 1818811111._1 Al1_88_8 08 880A0808 1118 ESSENTIAL LANGUAGE 08
1118 0881\10 8181'8 011,1.808 10 00080811 10 1118 le_ws 08 "1118`)1800888111 08"1118 0188,
4 lN wHIC_H UE SIA_TE` _w_l`ll. 08888 88008.

11 1118 _08`111 A 1000 1010 PRlNclPl-E 08 008 CRMNA_L -JU`ST<_:I'E- 81`81'88 THAT: (1) TPE`
DEFENDANT 801'10 1800 1118 1118 -810111 10 88 80118`180 08 1118 011A8088 AGAINST 11111_.
81 A 08AND 3081 0101<:100`11 PRES`_`ENTED 10'1118 00081., AND (2')~1,11188 1118180101818111
18 88108880 AND 1118 TRl`Al. 0001118, 1118 0118801110 LANGUAG_E AND 188118 08 1118 10ch1-
M`EM MAY 801 88 818880 08 080A08080 88081>1 01 1118 GRAND 81814 11881.8, 81 88808-
111881011 08 1118 0888 10 1118 08A1_10 8081, AND ANY 80011 18010181801 01811080 18 v01'0.
888 88 PA81'8 BAlN, 121 0. 8. 1, 7 8.01: 781 (1887); 8118008 v. 0111180 81A1'88, 361
0. 8. 212 90 8. ..cc 270 (1960)~;~0111180 81A18_8 v__. ADAM8, 778 8 2<1 1117 (5111 cir.

 

1085); EX PARTE SLED§E 391 S. W. 3d 104,198 (IEX. CRIM. APP. 2003); EX PARTE Mc-

 

 

_CAIN 67 F.3d 204, 207 n 6 (TEX. CRIM. APP. 2003).

lN 11118 00081"8 881/180.'88180 1181 1"1 ls"- 1101 08A1.11\10 1001 11888 sNIVEL-_ING 18-
808'8, 001 8811188_ 188088 08 FUNDAMmAL 011ARA0188,_A 8818088'10 00881088 1018
001111 w001.0 88801_1 18 A 808001811181 11180888_0108 08 3081018,`11111 1118 11188101 88.__-
801.1'80: 88011 1118 8011'88 080011811101100AL 008000'1`, 1101 1118 00881181110081. 88'808
11888. 1118 88801.180 10111810001_181110801180110 18.8010111.81 188001111, 080881118
DOCrRlNE 08 CDLmAN_. 001011 811_8"0888~11111 1118 88088A100081‘-S 01V8 1118 PROPER 88-
88801 10 1§1'11-8 808088811011. 801.8 08 lAw 18 00881108 1188818. 010v88 _v. 0118, 128
8-.3_<1 900 902.11188,1118 81A1'88 8A11.088 10 A011888 10 1118 HJNDAMNTAL 8018, wAlv»
80 1118 810111 10 181 1118 MovANT=

£1_) 010 1118 81A18 8808800108 ='001\18180011v8LY 111880 1118 11101'00~1811`18
CH`ARGlNc 888 0 81 101<1_081"18 81 1118 888880111`10 08 8A018 AND
8v108008 88001__80 0101188 888800 "08AY w 818011" 1101 01188080 18 1118

18

219

`811'18110 88801A1108 08 1118 8181'8. AND 1118 0008_1,11Av.8 8881 888-100811 00111=80111880
01108_8 ._0`1.A11_0, 507 0.8. 72~5',731, 13808088 (1.) 11188'8 1188 88808 08~'880118110'1_1\11 1881
1188 :cLEAR 1180 08v1008; (z) 1881 88880180 1118 SUNSTANTIVE 8-101118 08 1118 MOVANT,
AND (3) 11111A8880180 1118 101808111 AND 881>01A11011 08 1118 880088011108, AND 1_1_1_A_1
1'1"1118v 8801 1118 8800`0111 10 1118..00081'8 A1181111011 110010 HA`V`E~ 881108880 1118;1_000~.
118111 v010-, A`1`10 01181108.0 1118 00100'818~ 08 1118 88008801_1~_`108 88080881'118 00081 0001.0
1101 1'1AvE A11.01180 1118 1081 10 8010 00181 888__80 011-1181 8A08 08 881'108880 A 8100-
MENT 111 FAVOR. 08 1118 81818-. A 8180010881. 88808 1018 88801.180 AND AN_AU101~18110 88-
vER;SAL 18 88001880 IN ’IHI__S CASE.

1118'1~11)118111?'$ GO.U_NSEL'S PERF08MAN<:88 11888 801101111111181.1¥ DEFICIENT, BECAUSE 1180
11181_1 00111>81811111 8800011_1 8001'1 8008A1A8111/8 88808 10 1118 '00081"'.8' 8118'1`1`11011 (181AL
AND 1188me 00081~'-8) 111888 onLD 001 1181/8 138811 A 3000118111 881108880, 88'780811,'
001 808 1118 088101~8111 88880811ANCE 08 1118 00011881'8 1118 88801.18 08 1118 8800880- -
11108 11001.0 1181/8 08811 810NI_810AN1'LY 0188881011.8001'1 888100108 11888 88001.0 1101 00
01111011080 811 11181__8 00081.111 118 88v1-8w 880 080`181011.

CONCLUS ION

11111`1 1118 8A018 AND 8171081108 881110 FMY SECURED 011 1118 8A08 08 1118 880080
A110 111 8Av08 08 1118 1101181118 808111011_. IHI.S 00081 811001.0 111v8 110 01881001.1188 1_'1'1
1101:01110 1181 1118 MO`vANT 18 1118801 811111180 10 1118 881.'_18`8 8000111. As~ A. MA1188 08
LAw_, 808 1118 1881 08 1118 81A18 01188 1118 8001801'-1181'1'88 08881188 1118 81_A11'11`188' 8
8888011 As NA1180 111 1118 18010111881, 881110 8v8_1_08110_8' wAs 0888880 88011`1'110 1881
1118 8888011 NAMED 010 1101 001180811 10 1118 1:v`1081108 0888880 880 808 1118 1881 08

A vALID "8808881`_8 08088 AFFIDAV;T,",‘.IN 11111011 10 '8808813018 1118 MOVANT.

RF-LI.'.EF
2'0

20

1.. vAcAT_E. THE JUD@ENT"S OF THE IRIAL AND APPE;L.lAI"E .GO_URT'S
AND 01_>;1;1_=;3 A RmAND, oRDERING THE <;HARG`ES To BE DmIsSED
wITH` PREJUDICE, FOR- THE sIA'LiES wANT oF JUISDI@ION, AND

\2`. oRDBR THE MOVANT REIURNED 10 THE STATE APPELLATE cOURT'.S
JURISD_ICHON `FOR. A ouT-oF-T-IME APPEAL NIU~):N 30 DAYS, AND
IF. NjoT cum HIM Rm:AsED FRQ'M cus"-IUDY.

WHEREFORE, ALL PREMISE_S CONSIDERED IN THIS CASE`, THE MOVANT RESPECI`FUI.LY
ORGES TH_I_S HQNQRABLE COURT GRANT H~IS WRI'I` O_F ERROR CORAM NOBIS A_ND THE RELIEF
SOUG_HI`_, IN THE INTEREST 'I'f-IA_T JUSTICE BE SERVED AS A MATI'ER OF _DUE C_OURSE.

 

PAI..EST]NE 'IX». 75303

DECLARATION`

I IDREBY DECLARE THAT THE FOREGOING INFO`RMATION IS IRUE' AND cORRECT UNDER
PENAL;IY oF PERJURY. AND HA`S BEEN S_`ERVED 0N m FoLLowING PARTIES- QN.

E)(

 

 
  

Subsc_r_i_`qu and sworn _to before nie, the undei‘signed authofity, on this the Q .d'.ll. _

day o`f ` A¢D.-'.' g£_\l`}__ _ .
_ _. . 00.00&,
\/.~ M¢A/ _ __._ _

jose O-Ecer, Sniiih Co., Tex_a_s' 2 4

 
 

_ _ ' PAGE g oFL__.__
g voLuNj~'rAnY

sTATEME-NT QF.__ _ -

 

'CASE #._‘_’-Ls_:_z_

61 T\\:s_ \sj~.\~< A-._v.-gog-\_R -__\'o +k< keyng knowledge L¢~.il\_
,._~l:_zs:h"!_\¢_nm_¢_gr~_*_ C'_`¢

 

 

 

~ Subs_cribe_d and sworn to before me the undersigned amboiity,_ on thisthe z____.
day of §n.._~aq ,_ __ A'- D __&n_j'____

`r»_ /’76{»-'

_/_Eq¢€eOffic¢r.Shiiti\ CO-,.T¢XHS- . 25

oooow g

.\_/

sTATEMEN'r Ca§¢: at -§.~)3 _ _

   

IHE mm vfr-mms ` ' Pa¢_._»_m_ ' \

COUNTY oF sMrm " ~
aurora me, the mmigned authority on this ._z_.¢. day of ‘ ~- A.D.-, ;za,; ,

personally appeared ' c __ - who after bé_in`,zby me dwime

deposes and Sa`ys:-

'M_Z'Y`m€ i`S &ncx` __é¢hz\ __ _ " d I am_$i_ years of age. I was
bent on.»Z_¢£_/¢&&' ._ I have a _.IZ__ ' " ' numbered ¢£:;'_ ~/§57,3 ., My
Soci`al Seam;itynumbar`is .r._. 4 ' . '° ' `

- IHV¢ at . 30_

  

 

Engushlmguage. Iha'v¢ b¢.;p'mformed by " ' " ` ofth Tyie_r-Poii¢¢

. Depa`x_ttnent that under th`e_ Pe_nal- Code of dth'a State of Texas Secii_bn 37.08: A person

commits tha'offensa of.Fals`aRapart to a Pcaca OHi_car tf, with intent

to decaive, a person

  
 

Mm£¢vs Azz ____
:`zz 41#>` A'f
. Y'

 
      

 

 

 

     

F~ QQ§:L{Y_-_/.> kIZ( .:{¢IU FS_R_Z_M' flra J/YL -_R.z_ &¥ ,,
A~.')EJA¢ A~L ¢a.e'.'a.. g _ oz m' h' c
/_n;~:. Ace..u_. ny .ea'aa%¢.cm/ 4 ¢/~1&:, iy_" .)m.,.-p/J '

 

  
 
   
   

___ /a/§ _ 4 /§)r a¢@_¢,;_ a,a:z-r_- ¢u. .r_¢:_a;, -'m;»/
' ~ ‘ _ ‘ ..¢~r 5 " ‘

73@»¢/53"" 722 m 4_¢__.;,~ mei ~.7_.2 M aaf'._a/C'na_czz@g&
.~ &'~,v__ é,__ __ - _: a-_ .,¢v$ '_. _ o ..-I/ _!‘fueu .
' 1_3:/:' (-
C ".\. `£'

 

      

 

 

l

- I' c ~» rf ~l~.A'-. L! 0 5 .~ 2 ~14.._ `
~6'-`/\;/- _/_"m¢é A~h f;/Vm;»~@-v£.l'hm:-“,_{…`

4

 

'I=have read this statementwhtah consists af z page(s). I_agx"ee.that this statement

   
 

is true and correct to the best af my knowledge I
necessary . - ' -_ ,.

_ ti.fy to s"uch i_n court if
x _ _
Sub'scn"b_`a_d and swarn.to befare me, the tmdersignad ailtharity, on this the z) . _ §
" ` ;-,,_. _- /!7»/!_ - _

,e»a¢¢.oaiger, Smith cbaa_ty, rem 26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_I have read this statement which consists o'i'_ _ z page(s). I agreethat this-Si§ltement

is true and correct to tiie best of,t_n_y lmowledg`e. I will testify to such in court if -
necessary4 . . z ~ . v /

 
 

Subscribad and sworn to before me, the nn ’gned authoth on'this the l l 00 00 é”

day`Of za~¢m&r ,_ A.D_., M_. ' _
. . n r»-_- _/47'¢¢"' ,.
_ M:Omcer, Smith Cou‘m'y, rem 27

 

0 INDICTMENT §
rid CD' -O:Qibv_
CHARGE: Aggravafed Assault _ ART|CLE__ 22.02 CONTROL #_ 03-01263

 

IN THE NAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
. THE GRAND JURORS, duly selected, organized, sworn and impaneled as such for the County of Smith,

State' of Texas, at the January - June Term, 2003l of the 7th Judicia| District Court in and for said County,

_ _ a quorum thereof being present, upon lheir oaths present in and to said Court that on or about the 19th
_ _ day of January, 2003l and anterior to the presentment of this Indictment, in the County of Smith and State
of Texas, Wil_LlE RAY did then and there intentionally, knowingly. or recklessly cause bodily injury to
Patrick Loftis by cutting Patrick Loftis, and the defendant did then and there use or exhibit a deadly

weapon, to-wit: a knife, during the commission of said assault

 

And it is further presented in and to said Court that during the commission of each of the above described
_felony offenses, the said W|LL|E RAY did use and exhibit a deadly weapon. to-wit: a knife, that in the
manner of its use and intended use was capable of causing death and serious bodily injury;'

And it is further presented in and to said Court that, prior to the commission of the aforesaid offense,
WlLLIE RAY on the 7th day of March 1990, in cause 7-89-47 in the 7"1 District Court of Smith County,
Texas, the defendant was convicted of the felony offense of Bur§lary of a Hab'rtation;

Andl it is further presented in and to said Court that, prior to the commission of the primary offense. and
after the conviction in cause number 7-89-47 was fina|, the defendant committed the felony offense of
Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Felon and was convicted on the 26th day of February, 1996, in
cause number 7-95-584, in the 7'h District Court of Smith County, Texas.

AGAINST THE PEACE AND DICNI'I`Y OF` THEM

  

 

Origina|-Pink State’s Copy~Green

 

7

THE STATE 0F TEXAS b o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNTY OF SMITH
I, Lois Rogers, Clerk of the District Court within and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify
that the foregoing contains a true and correct copy of the Indictment in Cause No. , of the
State of Texas vs
as now on~t`ile in this office
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF l hereto set my hand and seal, this day
or ' v .A.l). 20 ' ' `
LOIS ROGERS
By . \ Clerk of the District Court
Deputy ` § Smith County, Texas
/`3.\`
m >~ 5 § ‘=
°" \-> :
§ 9 § § 'c 8 §
ca Z c s o _1 § ... v-
i“ m a *i < ‘“ a as § a f~
‘5 2 m 5 33 r- m o a ,__ d 33 n §
m Z =“ E = el -= -- o o Q I= =_
m > 9 m _"¢ § = : *" ha >d m § 0
E"‘ U ““ m 'ci ° ca “6 2 s m " ° n
- <¢ L=. _~¢ U [__ -c »-. r£ U
0 5a i-‘ o §§ 75 .= § °° <:> ... .<:
_ z m g , _, _a .‘§ urt.
the said verdict being a`s foilc`)ws: "We, the J.u`ry, find the Defe`njd_ant Gui|ty as charged i_`n the indictment /s/
Ken Dunn, For'ernan. Wher`eupOU. the De`fefnd_'ant having d_u_ly and timely elected t_o have his punishment
affixed by th_`e J_u`r`y, after punishment hearing held on J;i_t_h_ day of vSe'pt`ember, 2_003, t_he Jury as_`s;essed'thje
De`_fehdajnt's'punish:r_nent at a fine of~§_O. and For_ty. ,five.(45).years qdn_n_nerhent_ in the Tex`as.Degartme`nt of
Criminal .-lu'stice=.-.institutional/Division with credit for time served

30

_ _ l`_[ IS THEREFORE CU_NS|DERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGES the.Jur_y that the Defendant
WILL|E RAY_is Guil_ty of the Off_e'nse of A'gg` 'r`g`\`/ated Az`;sag|t a felony, as charged'in the indictment herein, as
fgu_n_d b`y the-J_liry, and th_at_~h'e be punished by a` fine o`f$_O,and Fogy+frve (45)years confinement in the Texas_
De artrnent of Criminal..lu’st[ca:-.ln'stitutidnal Divisio`n with credit for time seNed, and the»S`tate of Texas did
have and recover of th_e said defendant `a`_|i cbéts é'f this pr`o`secution expended,.for all of which let.execution
issue. and thatithe said defendant be remanded to-await further orders of the ourt~.here`in.

 

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/ l _ _
, siding Judge
night Thumb court
. -» asi
67 " /)-'O
'DateSign__ed n wl w ` "
/

31

THE STATE OF TEXAS

“VS

__M-l__,"l_ lie ~ gag

‘AUSE No. 007"' 0 395 - g

 

OF

mcmcmcooém

`EXAS

 

 

_'IM_L COURT’S. c_ERTIFICATION 0F m

RIQ HT QF API_’EAL

I, KERRY _L_. RUSSELL, certify this criminal case:

 

 

 

 

is net a plea-bargain c`a'se, and the~Defendant has the right of appeal _(o'r)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ill i_s a plea»barg`ain case, birt matters were raised by Written motian filed and ruled on before trial and not
withdrawn and Waived, and the Defendanthas the right of appeal (or)
ij i_s a_ plea-bargain case, bL'l`t the trial eour't has given permission to appeal, and the Defendant has the right of
appeal (or)
ill is a plea¢b`arga`in case, and th_e Defendant.has N 0 right of a ,- ..
l:l the Defendant has waived the right ofappeal~.
4 . _ /0 '-/O» 0 3
Date Signed
I, have received a copy of this certification:
Defejndan`t (zfnot represented by counsel) Defehdant’s Cuouns'el_
\/Iailing address:- State Barof‘l`e)_c_as ID # 00 73 7 ?3>‘3
Mailing Addres : '
_ _ 7 v _ . /@71 § /O= okay 574=. 333
telephone No. _ _ _' __ _ W/€/'7;r 75/703 z l
"ax N0.-(if any) __ _. Telepho,l_ie NO. lj.o§) 5 ? _3-5’0 1710 "

 

 

FaxNo.(ifany) C?@z/ 573»?`5"7?`7
, ' 32‘

 

Smith county Courthouse ' Lois Rogers (903) 590-1675
100 N. Broadway, Room 204 t

F 903 590-16613
Tv'er,TeXaS?S?OZ - Smith County District Clerk TTYafFI§D<@)Os)SSS-G@?S

Apri| 08, 2015

_W|LL|E RAY

Powledge Unit #1210691
1400 Fm 3452

Pa|estine, Texas 75803

Re: Cause No.: 007-0396-03-B-

Your Writ of CORl\/l NOB|S has been not grocessed. lt is this day being
forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin.

This letter Shou|d be kept With your records.

Slncere|y,

Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk

Bt/; U\SM£ Q¢¢W/ JW

Linda Ruth Rhymes, Deputy

33

WA|VER OF SERV|CE

|, LlNDA RHYl\/IES, received the Writ of Coram Nobis that Was filed in
the District Clerk’s Office on the 27th day of March, 2015.

lt Was hand delivered to the District Attorney’e Office on the

27th day Of MARCHl 2015.

 

File Name: RAY, W|LLIAM JEROME
Cause No.: 007-0396-03
Writ No.: _Q______O?- 0396- 03- B

(j£é/Mjé QA¢Z// Jée|ivered By
W'“_/

 

Delivered To

Office of the District Clerk
Smith County Courthouse
100 North Broadway
Tyler, Texas 75710

34

 

Smith County Courthouse ’ Lois Rogers (903) 590-1675
100 N. Broadway, Room 204

F 903 590-16613
Tv'er,T@XaSWOZ Smith'COunty District Clerk TTY#L(>D<$Os)SSS-O€?S

April 08, 2015

W|LLIE RAY

Powledge Unit #1210691
1400 Fm 3452

Pa|estine, Texas 75803

Re: Cause No.: 007-0396-03

Your Writ of CORl\/l NOB|S has been not grocessed. lt is this day being
forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appea|s in Austin.

This letter should be kept With your records.

Sincerely,

Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk

By: HW/L Q¢¢Z/; J%chg

Linda Ruth Rhymes, Deputy

35

 

 

 

535 »¢z §§

 

§.~.3 §§ u§§..§ 2_¢,_~=£2_ MQSN w m_ CL<_

 

movie §§ ben od_Cr…WU M@ mw_ md

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Qrv_\__, \S<_ _
54
§§ d§ _ ore
_ _ em:m£§_mom§nz§_nz<¢e S._£§
_ E§Ez~ greene
HO¢.~ .AQ> u. _ . .. _ ._3>`?§.=¢2
§§ amoco § eo m¢ae¢e ease

 

..QU Q_ZQH _
_ _.ZC~B_§¢.QE mZOEQZOU`_>? ==_11 ._25 mma ._.HE< Q__ZO& .

.. _ . ucva § §§

ho _E<.,Q

 

 

3 . W d<_. §oo sense

 

me$o_.h¢. vouch ~mo.~.~,<

 

 

 

as@s

 

 

 

 

 

 

_n=ro_mn:.._>:__= .D_Z HD_D<.J _. _=_:_JS_Q J:_v=)

a S-a :. .oaas._éo wide ,S_So_

_ S-§_.S Eazme§.< miami ao m§oEouw ¢§ won §.=_ca.. ca mn§.: |l.l..l..|l||>§:o:.\ 7_
5§~ vooc:occc Edemm&m _.H_.. ___ __L _ . 3
95 §§23 of ..§Emo 3 590 w 3§5 2 §§ w §a__._p_ ___..,
esm .._…£_ …E.. nu,m.,__=§_§:o ~§£ A>c.Q._w.w 55 §§me ES=S§

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

§ §

 

 

 

 

     

>m_,:c.~w E_Zo… EmEmoe=occw ca mas_.c___...l¢,!! . _B _

>,._…wf.~$n_ww: kon F...._.___... §§, ima §§
___ _ _~ 2 _. . h_mmw§o»o&:woww§=£ ._ o. m
saw 2=. _.2_, 32._§_=2¢ § gmva FS.MM¢__H _

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_ _ § m w §
Hmv¢h_ ¢~Q> . _ _ _ < 1 , .\ _. . _\ h
§|ll\§_ _ ._ _ _ .~.-.DOU m=.~,~. rio QMHD¢O _ m¢~uuvadhmw`%wwda

 

 

 

Q»:§§~,_,_ 9 .:: done

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

§ m - am

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

.r l_».fw¥=.;o¢mm. bon FYWL.BS§§ .§ B__..a»&.m 336
C,, A.U ,_ Q.Q.¢E... . , . ..
_. _ . ..- . . n.,§Bw&._\..,.Q..§“M 22 T %<.
mci ...o> _ .

..¢o>`mae£=o£
l|.|.ll|¢l w mv- Q
§ 4 v .E:ou ,,.E:o_m~_wn¢o . §

howh.¢°

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

W .m>
E<.B . .E. ..zw§m zu<_. , v m
MOCM N,E_ ~Z~E

 

 

 

. .~3»§¢&£==2
_ m¢w§o.m©.n.=.<¢

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

i§§§§§§§§@

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<¢

 

 

 

 

Hw

 

 

 

 

 

 

v:ug N.=~Z_E

 

w+€.xz.d..q.§§\q

 

 

 

 

 

Q._K§ § w

 

§E».EB.§E .
B_w=zo mo §§ w

 

 

 

 

mow

3§@-§@ .

O_Z Hmaw-# `.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

§§ § \§§ ai\§ § § §

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

§ S\N§§§\N§ §§§ . y , §r_ b §
§§ §§ § § § ….
www§wz_w» _ _ ,E:oo §§ mo m§::_o _ §

 

 

 

5\… _. _. . . _ .oz,mm;