Court Opinion

ID: 9380232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-17 18:00:33.527397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:23.649204
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40590         Document: 00516680214             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-40590                         FILED
                                     Summary Calendar                 March 17, 2023
                                     ____________                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Juan Antonio Carrillo-Rodriguez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:21-CR-1026-3
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Juan Antonio Carrillo-Rodriguez
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carrillo-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40590    Document: 00516680214          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/17/2023

                                  No. 22-40590

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2