Court Opinion

ID: 670904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:39:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:00.349431
License: Public Domain

25 F.3d 1040NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Byrd MILLER, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Joseph L. HAMILTON;  Charles M. Creecy;  Harry L. Allbrooks;Larry E. Davis;  James W. Cook;  Mrs. Thompson;Doctor Stanley, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7023.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.Submitted May 24, 1994.Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-90-521-CRT-D).
James Byrd Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Ass't Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Miller v. Hamilton, No. CA-90-521-CRT-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.  We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

AFFIRMED