Court Opinion

ID: 3291517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:07:34.588835+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:00.707881
License: Public Domain

Plaintiff sued for an annulment of his marriage with Lillian E. Cohn upon the alleged ground that she was insane at the time of the marriage contract. At the time of the trial Mrs. Cohn had been adjudged insane and she appeared herein through her guardianad. litem. Plaintiff had a judgment of annulment under circumstances which thereafter appeared to her guardian to be fraudulent and her guardian moved to set aside the judgment upon that ground. This motion was denied and the guardian perfected this appeal. After her opening brief was filed, and before a reply had been made by the respondent, Mrs. Cohn died. An administratrix was thereupon appointed and she now moves for a dismissal of the appeal.
No authorities are cited in support of the motion, but the moving party rests on the mere statement that Mrs. Cohn is deceased. [1] Where fraud is practiced in annulment or divorce proceedings the death of one of the parties does not abate the proceedings to purge the record of the alleged fraud. (McGuinness v. Superior Court, 196 Cal. 222, 232-236 [237 P. 42, 40 A.L.R. 1110].)
[2] For this reason the dismissal of this appeal should not be taken as an affirmance of the order appealed from in so far as the court or other interested parties are concerned. The dismissal is limited to the single ground that the parties *Page 465 
to the record have agreed that this particular proceeding should be terminated.
Appeal dismissed.
Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.