Court Opinion

ID: 9890665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-13 21:00:43.247338+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:39.800917
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7165      Doc: 24         Filed: 10/12/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7165

        DOUGLAS WILLIAM ARNOLD,

                            Petitioner - Appellant,

                     v.

        HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections,

                            Respondent - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
        Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00417-JPJ-PMS)

        Submitted: October 5, 2023                                    Decided: October 12, 2023

        Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Douglas William Arnold, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7165      Doc: 24         Filed: 10/12/2023      Pg: 2 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Douglas William Arnold seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on

        his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

        issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of

        appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

        right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a

        prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the

        district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.

        Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural

        grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is

        debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional

        right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529

        U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

               Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Arnold’s informal brief, we

        conclude that he has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also

        Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important

        document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that

        brief.”). Reasonable jurists could not find either the district court’s procedural rulings or

        its rejection of Arnold’s claims on their merits to be debatable or wrong. And we decline

        to address the new argument Arnold seeks to raise on appeal. See Garey v. James S. Farrin,

        P.C., 35 F.4th 917, 928 (4th Cir. 2022) (“It is well established that this court does not

        consider issues raised for the first time on appeal, absent exceptional circumstances.”

                                                     2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7165         Doc: 24     Filed: 10/12/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

        and dismiss the appeal. We deny Arnold’s motions for a certificate of appealability, for

        appointment of counsel, and for production of a transcript at government expense, and we

        deny as moot his motion for bail or release pending appeal.

              We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                   DISMISSED

                                                    3