Court Opinion

ID: 8311565
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 15:49:47.084814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:44.941716
License: Public Domain

THE COURT refused to consider the answer as sufficiently certified, and refused to dissolve the injunction. The court cited the cases of Wright v. West, [Case No. 18.102,] and Lloyd v. Lund, [Id. 8,433,] at Alexandria, March, 1806; Watson v. Tapscot, [Id. 17,290,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Potts v. Ghequere, [Id. 11,346,] Alexandria, March, 1805; Wilson v. Stewart, [Id. 17,837,] Alexandria, June, 1803; Mandeville v. Ringgold, [Id. 9,015,] Alexandria; and Tibbs v. Parrott, [Cases 14,-022, 14,023,] Washington, June, 1806.