Court Opinion

ID: 9780273
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 01:44:34.67894+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:34:01.580472
License: Public Domain

KUHN, J.,
dissenting.
hi respectfully disagree with the majority’s implicit conclusion that the judgment granting partial summary judgment in favor of GECF is appealable. I do not believe the judgment is appealable under La. C.C.P. art. 1915 A(3). I point out that the judgment does specify the amount owed on the debt, expressly requiring that the parties return to court to have an amount set. This deficiency is underscored by the fact that the judgment creates a judicial mortgage — required to be recorded in the mortgage and conveyance records — but without a decree of the amount. Lastly, I note that the judgment reserves rights against unnamed parties thereby demonstrating the interlocutory nature of the decree. Because 1 agree that trial court correctly ruled upon those matters before it, if this court were to convert the appeal to a writ application, I would deny the writ.