Court Opinion

ID: 2923299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:29:01.034291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:06.416022
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-300-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_________________________________________________  _______________   
 
 
IN RE: GUIDANT CORPORATION, GUIDANT SALES CORPORATION, GUIDANT PUERTO
RICO SALES CORPORATION & CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC.
___________________________________________________   __________      
 
 
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus 
and Motion for Emergency Relief.

 
_____________________________________________________   _________    

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
         Before Chief Justice Valdez and
Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                            Memorandum Opinion
Per  Curiam
                                                    

Relators, Guidant
Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, and Guidant Puerto Rico Sales
Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., filed a petition for writ of
mandamus and motion for emergency relief on June 6, 2006.  After the petition and motion were filed,
relators filed a motion to dismiss wherein they announced that they had reached
an agreement with real parties in interest and that they no longer wish to
prosecute either the petition for writ of mandamus or the motion for emergency
relief.      The
Court, having considered the documents on file and relators= motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the
motion should be granted.  Relators= motion to dismiss is hereby granted.  Relators= petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED.  Additionally, relators= motion for emergency relief is DENIED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 7th day of June, 2006.