Court Opinion

ID: 998189
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:07:23.231168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:49.239771
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7313

DONALD BRAXTON,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF MARYLAND,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-97-3511-JFM)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor-
ney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Donald Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny in

forma pauperis status, deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

Braxton v. Smith, No. CA-97-3511-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1998).    We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2