Court Opinion

ID: 1008202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:36:44.034762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:31.745920
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PETE SMITH, a/k/a Jose,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-93-117, CA-02-265)

Submitted:   July 25, 2002                 Decided:   August 2, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se.    Scott Patrick Mebane, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Pete Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion construed as filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-93-117; CA-02-

265 (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2002).      We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2