Court Opinion

ID: 8682658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 06:03:47.673445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:31.750055
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan E. Wilson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and denying without prejudice his motion regarding mediation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wilson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED