Court Opinion

ID: 4534435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-05-14 19:08:19.43762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:36:34.667025
License: Public Domain

Serial: 231557
                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

                                  No. 89-R-99001-SCT
                                                                      FILED
IN RE: THE RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
                                                                       MAY 05 2020
                                                                   OFFICE OF THE CLERK
                                                                     SUPREME COURT
                                                                    COURT OF APPEALS
                                   EN BANC ORDER

      Before the en bane Court is the Motion to Amend M.R.C.P. 43 (Motion No. 2019-

3487), filed by the Advisory Committee on Rules.

      After due consideration, we find that the motion should be granted.

      IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Amend M.R.C.P. 43 is granted.

Rule 43 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The amendments shall be effective

on July 1, 2020.

       SO ORDERED, this the      f;    day of   a   202ru
                                             MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH,
                                             CHIEF JUSTICE
                                             FOR THE COURT

ALL JUSTICES AGREE.
                                           EXHIBIT A

                          RULE 43. TAKING OF TESTIMONY

        (a) Form and Admissibility. In all trials the testimony of witnesses shall be taken
orally in open court, unless otherwise provided by these rules or the Mississippi Rules of
Evidence.

       (b) [Ab1 ogated]

       (c) [Ab1 ogated]

       trl) ® Affirmation in Lieu of Oath. Whenever under these rules an oath is required
to be taken, a solemn affirmation may be accepted in lieu thereof.

       te1 W  Evidence on Motions. When a motion is based on facts not appearing of
record the court may hear the matter on affidavits presented by the respective parties, but the
court may direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly on oral testimony or depositions.

       ffl@ Interpreters. The court may appoint an interpreter of its own selection and
may assess fix his reasonable compensation. The compensation shall be paid out of funds
provided by law or by one or more of the parties as the court may direct and may be taxed
ultimately as costs, in the discretion of the court. However, in the event and to the extent that
such interpreters are required to be provided under the provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S. C. § 12131, et seq. or under rules or regulations promulgated
pursuant thereto, such compensation and other costs of compliance shall be paid by the
county in which the court sits, and shall not be taxed as costs.

(Amended effective January 10, 1986; amended June 5, 1997: amended effective July 1,
2020.]

                           Advisory Committee Historical Note

      Effective July 1, 2020, Rule 43 was amended to re-designate former Rule 43(d)
[Affirmation in Lieu of Oath] as Rule 43(b); to re-designate former Rule 43(e) [Evidence on
Motions] as Rule 43(c); and to re-designate former Rule 43(1) [Interpreters] as Rule 43(d).

       Effective July 1, 1998, Rule 43(f) [Interpreters] was amended in regard to compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq.

       Effective January 10, 1986, Rule 43(a) was amended to provide.that testimony may
be taken other than in open court, as provided by the Mississippi Rules of Evidence, and to

                                               2
 delete references to the admissibility of evidence; Rule 43(b) [Mode and Order of
 Interrogation], and Rule 43( c) [Record of Excluded Evidence] were abrogated. 4 78-481 So.
-2d XXVII (West Miss. Cas. 1986).

                                             3