Court Opinion

ID: 9720610
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 08:37:29.609445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:19.924337
License: Public Domain

Danhof, J.,
(concurring). I concur with the result reached by the majority, but because their opin*717ion perpetuates what I consider to be the erroneous philosophy expressed in People v. Hernandez (1968), 15 Mich App 141, I cannot subscribe to the same. See People v. Noble (1969), 18 Mich App 300, fn 1, p 302:
“The Court is aware of People v. Hernandez (1968), 15 Mich App 141, which by a decision of two to one considers a delay in arrest a violation of due process. This panel does not agree with the holding of that case and will not follow it until the ruling of that case is determined controlling in similar cases by the Michigan Supreme Court.”
The order of the trial judge quashing the information and discharging the defendant is reversed; the information reinstated and the defendant remanded to the trial court for trial.