Court Opinion

ID: 2662023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-03 11:39:55.89767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:58:09.348966
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)
CARMEN JEAN-BAPTISTE, )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) civil A¢¢ion No. 11-1537 (RCL)
)
D[STRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) F I L E o
Defendant. § AUG l 0 
C\ k, U.S. District and
vERDlcT FoRM bankruptcy courts

A. TITLE VII and DC HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM
AGAINST DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Al. Do you find it more likely than not that Rodney Weaver Subjected the plaintiff to
unwelcome verbal or physical conduct?

YES NO

If you answered NO, then your verdict must be in favor of the defendant. If you
answered YES, then:

A2. Do you find the conduct was sufficiently severe or pervasive such that it created a
hostile work environment by changing the terms and conditions of plaintiffs
ernployment?

YE§ NO

lf you answered NO, then your verdict must be in favor of the defendant. If you
answered YES, then:

A3. Do you find that the defendant exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct
promptly any sexually harassing behavior in the workplace and that the plaintiff
unreasonably failed to take advantage of the preventive or corrective opportunities
provided by the defendant to avoid or correct the harm, or otherwise failed to exercise
reasonable care to avoid harm?
/X\

YES NO

If you answered YES to Question A3, then your verdict on this claim must be in favor of
the defendant.

B. TITLE VII AND DC HUMAN RIGHTS ACT RETALIATION CLAIM AGAINST
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Bl. Has plaintiff proven by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff s complaint(s)
was/were a substantial or motivating factor in the District of Columbia deciding not to
offer plaintiff permanent employment or deciding to terminate her?

_X_

YES NO

If you answered NO to Question Bl, then your verdict on this claim must be in favor of
the defendant.

C. DC WHISTLEBLOWER’S PROTECTION ACT CLAIM AGAINST DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA

Cl. Do you find it more likely than not that the plaintiff engaged in a protected activity?

ah

YES NO

If you answered NO, then your verdict must be in favor of the defendant. If you
answered YES, then:

C2. Do you find that the defendant took a prohibited personnel action against the
plaintiff?

YES § NO

If you answered NO, then your verdict must be in favor of the defendant. If you
answered YES, then:

C3. Do you find that the plaintiffs protected activity was a substantial or motivating
factor that prompted the District of Columbia to decide not to offer plaintiff permanent
employment or deciding to terminate her?

YES NO

If you answered NO to Question C3, then your verdict on this claim must be in favor of
the defendant.

D. DAMAGES

If your answer to Question A3 is NO, or if your answer to Question Bl is YES, or if your
answer to Question C3 is YES, what amount of damages do you award plaintiff?

$ 35 m.`//`¢W\

£Zz./i z»»/; __

Date Jli?/Forepersoil

FILED /J¢, ,/o/ za/z.
Aus 102012 3

W@ jj d f °'z':,»r/_~Vr~t€;se::::£ Vmm \/:“M /Ea)méh[e f
s//a,:/z`,%£ 7//. D/zv<»ev¢.»f F¢/¢/-é'<~,

 /cj ec?[£// /’£Cd?»¢-tm€m¢»/S
7%¢ A//@'z,./r.,?zj 2:/ /7»<£»5<>¢,9 as //a\/?#

4 ¢70 5/»,¢,¢4 ~e.s dq;a.rc/€c»/ /`h 7¢£»"$ 0¢'5€.'

, ""777€ @/c>/éwa/¢»¢J¢` p»??¢‘<=ll`o)c('°/~""f""’~
A_/¢,¢¢/§//  an  7{’4¢'}»¢/)1\? /f`¢'» I"@»W\

__»A{ Q///?i//D{zf»{¢:.j€fj a/v'~v/A/[A,/@€  ]¢34§¢,_'/¢5,

ia/a.*/aé/e 76 Q// new M@~Acjffs / m@A»a//)?

)5,,¢ war ar owner made ~¢r.r '
_ z¢lzle_g  re.~¢¢)»»e a,¢»¢é-’ _uf `4`$
 550 
. /.@ce'.§§¢’._s Q/p¢¢/ ¢’/¢,ri,r§i  6/é 3 /%¢/57£`
,jg /é¢é€u /’>c 4a /`))¢/»¢.'»" 4 d ‘¥"‘
250 c /@-»>-%- 6
v '/z e%:`,‘_j;...//é /p(t/§/L /`L¢/?§`c¢}é 4 '”€l/J`~€u)
 q¢,sézv¢,s/ d‘;/  -»7[¢¢0)£'1»\_, 
ha j»r‘// 2397/§ / eps ¢=-»H 7;,&>¢~. ;;>/;@//¥,/a%c. paz/vw
MWW -Z@dé» 7/“>:§4 \/»¢»'1~-/ 7~@@7. z€
i/eu)ao ;lW/¢/ 5a am /@¢¢-¢/ é/ a /e»g»~»» w
/z;.<=.»sm-S m'%(, 7% /@wew  /35¢)& <=\ ref.)[°