Court Opinion

ID: 8441135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:30:20.735145+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.260640
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jean-Claude Rinehart appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rinehart v. Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03019-D, 2011 WL 52360 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2011). We further deny Rinehart’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.