Court Opinion

ID: 6533248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 21:21:22.680566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:26.891963
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
*453Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm (Count 1), unlawful use of a weapon (Counts 2 and 3), and menacing (Counts 4 and 5). He assigns error to the trial court's entry of judgment designating Counts 2, 3, and 4 as crimes "constituting domestic violence," ORS 132.586.1 The state concedes that the trial court's insertion of the phrase "constituting domestic violence" in Counts 2 through 4 was error because the state never alleged that Count 3 was a crime constituting domestic violence and because the state decided not to pursue proof of that element with regard to Counts 2 and 4. We agree, accept the state's concession, and remand for entry of a corrected judgment that deletes all references to the "constituting domestic violence" element from the judgment of conviction. See State v. Neighbors , 283 Or. App. 488, 489, 388 P.3d 1250 (2017). We otherwise affirm defendant's judgment of conviction.2
Remanded for entry of a corrected judgment deleting all references to "constituting domestic violence"; otherwise affirmed.

ORS 132.568 provides, in part:
"(2) When a crime involves domestic violence, the accusatory instrument may plead, and the prosecution may prove at trial, domestic violence as an element of the crime. When a crime is so pleaded, the words 'constituting domestic violence' may be added to the title of the crime."

Defendant also assigns error to the trial court's jury instruction allowing nonunanimous guilty verdicts. We reject that assignment of error without published discussion.