Court Opinion

ID: 7619350
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 14:59:16.428503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:01.415369
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) (holding that if the return of service is regular on its face, service of process is presumed to be valid, *383and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).