Court Opinion

ID: 5910714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 03:52:24.048747+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:00.422134
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme *704Court, Kangs County (Walsh, J.), imposed February 4, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.