Court Opinion

ID: 9527949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:35:45.639569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:18.495479
License: Public Domain

RATLIFF, Chief Judge,
concurring.
When Cade agreed that the testimony requested should not be replayed to the jury, he waived any alleged error in not granting the jury’s request. He thereby invited the error and may not now complain. Berry v. State (1991), Ind.App., 574 N.E.2d 960, 963, trans. denied. Neither was such error, if in fact there was any error, fundamental error. Survance v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 1076, 1084.
I agree with the majority opinion in holding any error to be invited error and not fundamental error. Having so held, there is no reason to go further. On these bases, and without expressing an opinion as to the other matters discussed by the majority, I concur.