Court Opinion

ID: 9825444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 13:00:50.351762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:49.988258
License: Public Domain

MAYFIELD, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ.
(dissenting), do not feel that it is necessary to indorse the foregoing opinion or to disapprove the opinion of the Court of Appeals, as they think that the writ should be denied for the reason that the question upon which the Court of Appeals is - reversed was not so reserved or presented as to authorize the reversal of the • trial court. The majority not only think that it was so presented, but, even if it was not, the Court of Appeals did not act' upon this theory, but unqualifiedly approved the oral charge as excepted, to and laid down unsound legal principles in doing so.