Court Opinion

ID: 988681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:55:43.537544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.451709
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7718

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HENRY SMALLS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-91-288-2, CA-94-3508-2-8)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Smalls, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin A. Hagood, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smalls, Nos.
CR-91-288-2; CA-94-3508-2-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 1995). We deny Appel-

lant's motion for counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2