Court Opinion

ID: 4357303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-09 20:00:36.925775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:15:36.873373
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-40614      Document: 00514786049         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/08/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-40614                             FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   January 8, 2019
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL HOLGUIN-BARRAZA, also known as Juan Manuel
Barraza-Mendez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:18-CR-257-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel
Holguin-Barraza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).            Holguin-Barraza has not filed a

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-40614   Document: 00514786049    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/08/2019

                               No. 18-40614

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2