Court Opinion

ID: 3125135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:04:11.824561+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:37:02.925217
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                           No. 04-12-00277-CV

               In re Green Tree Servicing, LLC as Successor Servicer for BAHS –
                              A Division of Bank of America, FSB

                                     Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:         Karen Angelini, Justice
                 Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
                 Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 16, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On May 4, 2012, Relator Green Tree Servicing, LLC as Successor Servicer for BAHS -

A Division of Bank of America, FSB, filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the

trial court erred in denying a motion to compel arbitration. Mandamus, however, will issue only

to correct a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has no adequate remedy at law. In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v.

Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code section 51.016 permits interlocutory appeals “to the court of appeals from the

judgment or interlocutory order of a district court . . . under the same circumstances that an

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10-08-49259, styled Green Tree Servicing, LLC as Successor Servicer for
BAHS - A Division of Bank of America, FSB v. Gloria T. Zarate and Rene Zarate, Jr., pending in the 79th Judicial
District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
                                                                                 04-12-00277-CV

appeal from a federal district court’s order or decision would be permitted by 9 U.S.C. Section

16.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM CODE ANN. § 51.016; CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 448-

49 (Tex. 2011) (explaining that section 51.016 provides for interlocutory appeals in Federal

Arbitration Act cases so long as “it would be permitted under the same circumstances in federal

court under section 16.”).   We, therefore, conclude Relator failed to establish he lacks an

adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

                                                   PER CURIAM

                                             -2-