Court Opinion

ID: 4560430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-26 21:02:10.980213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:15:52.132143
License: Public Domain

FILED
Aug 09, 2019
02:41 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS

 

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE
RASHELLE NIGMATYANOV, )
Employee, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2320
)
V. ) State File No. 67955-2018
)
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC., ) Judge Joshua D. Baker
Employer. )

 

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

 

The Court convened an expedited hearing on July 17, 2019, to consider whether
Ms. Nigmatyanov is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits for her alleged,
work-related right-shoulder injury. For the reasons below, the Court finds she is likely to
prevail in proving entitlement to additional medical benefits. The Court denies her
request for temporary disability benefits at this time.!

Claim History

On September 4, 2018, Ms. Nigmatyanov alleged disabling pain in her right
shoulder from lifting heavy bags of mulch, rock, and soil for Lowe’s customers. She had
prior right shoulder problems, including a rotator cuff repair roughly ten years before and
a 2017 work injury at Lowe’s for which she treated with an orthopedic specialist.

When the 2018 accident occurred, Lowe’s prepared a First Report of Injury
indicating Ms. Nigmatyanov reported a lifting injury. Instead of providing a panel, she
testified Lowe’s directed her to Dr. Paul Niner because her treating physician from 2017
was unavailable.

 

' Ms. Nigmatyanov presented medical bills and records at the hearing. Lowe’s objected to their
admissibility due to the untimeliness of the submission. See Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-21-.14
(1)(a)-(c). The Court sustained the objection and admitted the documentation for identification purposes
only.
Dr. Niner documented that he suspected “an arthritic type process,” treated her
conservatively over a few weeks, and restricted her from pushing or pulling more than
fifteen pounds from September 14 until October 22. During her last visit, he maintained
her restrictions until a follow-up appointment on October 22.

Ms. Nigmatyanov did not see Dr. Niner again because Lowe’s denied her claim
based upon Dr. Niner’s causation responses to questionnaires. He initially suggested that
Ms. Nigmatyanov’s repetitive lifting at Lowe’s aggravated a pre-existing, degenerative
condition. When asked if her need for treatment was primarily related to increased pain
from the work accident, he responded under “Yes” by writing, “Possibly — But root cause
is likely degenerative and aggravated by repetitive movement.” Dr. Niner also stated,
“[R]epetitive work/movements and age could be an aggravating factor.”

Following Dr. Niner’s initial response, Lowe’s sent a second questionnaire, which
relayed the statutory definition of an injury as one where employment contributed more
than fifty percent to the injury considering all causes. When asked if the primary cause
of Ms. Nigmatyanov’s degenerative condition was her current work injury, former work
injury, or the rotator cuff repair, Dr. Niner responded that the primary cause of her
shoulder’s degeneration was “age, surgery.” He wrote, “It is most likely that her issues
are not a direct result of her job but only an aggravating factor due to lifting — repetitive
lifting will likely keep aggravating her prior issues.” Regarding restrictions, he wrote,
“Without further eval. from ortho — I will not be able to give an accurate assessment.”

Nearly a year later, Lowe’s sent Dr. Niner a third questionnaire asking if his
orthopedist referral was primarily related to the rotator cuff repair rather than to her work
at Lowe’s. He marked, “Yes.”

During this period, Ms. Nigmatyanov stated that Lowe’s refused her attempts to
work because she could not lift at least thirty-five pounds.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To prevail at an expedited hearing, Ms. Nigmatyanov must provide sufficient
evidence to show that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code
Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). Here she must prove she would likely prevail in proving
entitlement to additional medical benefits and temporary disability benefits. The Court
holds she presented sufficient evidence to prove entitlement to additional medical
benefits but failed to present sufficient evidence to support her claim for temporary
disability benefits.

The question of medical benefits concerns whether Ms. Nigmatyanov suffered a
workers’ compensation injury. Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, an “injury”
means “an injury by accident . . . arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of

2
employment, that causes death, disablement, or the need for medical treatment of the
employee[.]” The injury must be caused “by a specific incident, or set of incidents,
arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.” “An injury arises
primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, if “the employment
contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury, considering all causes[.]”
An injury includes an aggravation of a preexisting condition if the aggravation arose
primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment. See Tenn. Code Ann. §50-
6-102(14).

Here, Ms. Nigmatyanov testified she hurt her shoulder while lifting heavy
landscape and gardening items for Lowe’s customers. She reported her injury as a new
one rather than a reoccurrence of her previous condition. Based on these facts, the Court
finds Ms. Nigmatyanov reported a specific incident or set of incidents that arose
primarily out of her employment.

When Ms. Nigmatyanov reported her injury, the Court finds that triggered Lowe’s
duty to provide a panel of physicians. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-01-.25(1); see
also, Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A) (“Upon notice of any workplace injury, other
than a minor injury for which no person could reasonably believe requires treatment from
a physician, the employer shall immediately provide the injured employee a panel of
physicians that meets the statutory requirements for treatment of the injury.”). Ms.
Nigmatyanov testified she never received a panel. Instead, Lowe’s directed her to Dr.
Niner. The Court holds that Lowe’s, by its action, prevented Ms. Nigmatyanov from
exercising her right to choose an authorized treating physician. The Court finds Lowe’s
action ran afoul of the rules governing provision of medical benefits and refers this claim
to the Compliance Program to consider imposition of penalties

As noted, although Lowe’s failed to provide Ms. Nigmatyanov a panel, it did pay
for treatment with Dr. Niner. As the only physician who treated her, the Court must
consider his opinion. Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS
32, at *10 (May 18, 2017) (“While we acknowledge that this opinion was rendered by
Employer’s physician rather than an authorized physician chosen from a panel, it is,
nonetheless, the only medical opinion upon which we can rely[.]”). As explained further
below, however, the Court finds Dr. Niner’s opinion insufficient to determine medical
causation.

The usefulness of Dr. Niner’s opinion is limited both by the questions posed to
him and by the narrow slip of a foundation on which he based his opinion. His initial
response to Lowe’s was based on perhaps one physical exam and x-rays because Lowe’s
denied her claim. Further, Lowe’s relayed to him the statutory definition of an injury, not
an aggravation when requesting the opinion. In other words, he did not have the correct
legal standard for determining an aggravation of a preexisting condition.
Even so, Dr. Niner’s responses indicate that Ms. Nigmatyanov “possibly” suffered
an aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Unfortunately, as noted above, he did not
have a wealth of diagnostic information or the correct legal standard with which to
determine or explain by what degree her employment aggravated her condition.
Furthermore, Dr. Niner noted in his response to the initial causation letter from Lowe’s
that Ms. Nigmatyanov should see an orthopedic specialist.

While Dr. Niner’s opinion is too inexplicit to support a preponderance of the
evidence standard, the Court finds it corroborates and supports Ms. Nigmatyanov’s
account that lifting heavy bags at Lowe’s aggravated her right shoulder and caused
disabling pain. When coupled with her testimony, the Court finds Dr. Niner’s opinion is
sufficient to support her claim for additional medical treatment. The Court holds Lowe’s
must provide Ms. Nigmatyanov a panel of orthopedic physicians from which she shall
select one to serve as the authorized treating physician.

Next, the Court addresses Ms. Nigmatyanov’s claim for temporary disability
benefits. She is eligible for these benefits if: (1) she became disabled due to a work
injury; (2) a causal connection exists between her work injury and inability to work; and
(3) she proved the duration of her disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015
TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). At this time, Ms.
Nigmatyanov’s claim for temporary disability benefits must fail because no physician has
definitively linked her condition to her work for Lowe’s.

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Nigmatyanov’s claim for medical benefits is granted. Lowe’s shall offer a
panel of three orthopedists from which Ms. Nigmatyanov shall select a physician
for medical treatment.

2. The Court denies Ms. Nigmatyanov’s claim for temporary disability benefits at
this time.

3. This case is referred to the Compliance Program to consider imposition of
penalties against Lowe’s for its failure to provide a panel of physicians.

4. This matter is set for a scheduling hearing on Monday, September 23, 2019, at
3:00 p.m. (CDT). The parties must call 615-741-2113 to participate in the
Hearing. Failure to call might result in a determination of issues without the
party’s participation.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of this Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

4
The employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the
Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh
business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary
confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment
for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the
Workers’ Compensation Penalty Unit by email at
WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED AUGUST 9, 2019.

st

Jéshna Davis Baker, Judge
ourt of Workers’ Compensation Claims
APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1.

ee eo ee

Medical Records, including questionnaire responses of Dr. Paul Niner dated
September 21 and October 16, 2018

Affidavit of Rashelle Nigmatyanov

Questionnaire Response of Dr. Paul Niner dated July 2, 2019

Wage Statement

First Report of Injury

Notice of Denial dated October 18, 2018

Medical Records from Northcrest Physician Services, Bills and Receipts, for
identification purposes only

Notice of Denial dated October 30, 2018

Technical Record:

1.

COON AARWY

Petition for Benefit Determination
Dispute Certification Notice
Request for Expedited Hearing
Employee’s Motion to Continue
Order Granting Continuance
Employer’s Motion to Continue
Order Granting Continuance
Employee’s Motion to Compel
Employer’s Exhibit List

10. Order Granting Motion to Compel

11.Employer’s Motion to Alter or Amend Order Compelling Discovery
12.Employee’s Exhibit List

13.Employee’s Response to Employer’s Motion to Alter or Amend Order
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on August 9, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:

Mail
Rashelle Nigmatyanov, Xx Shelme2222@gmail.com
Employee
Carolina Martin, X Carolina.martin@leitnerfirm.com
Employer’s Attorney

 

 

 

 

 

Lire ll ae

Penlny Shrus, Court Clerk
Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

 
 

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the
form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven
business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice
of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
LB-1099

 

EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL
Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation
www. tn.gov/labor-wid/weomp.shtml
wce.courtclerk@tn.gov
1-800-332-2667

 

Docket #:
State File #/YR:

 

Employee

Vv.

 

Employer
Notice
Notice is given that

 

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at

to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals

 

Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]

Judge

Statement of the Issues
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

 

 

 

Additional Information
Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

L] Temporary disability benefits
L] Medical benefits for current injury
LC Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties
Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee

Address:

 

Party’s Phone: Email:
Attorney's Name: BPR#:
Attorney’s Address: Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code:

 

Attorney’s Email:

 

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
Employee Name: SF#: DOI:

Appellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]JEmployer LJEmployee

 

Appellee’s Address:

 

 

 

Appellee’s Phone: Email:
Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
Attorney’s Address: Phone:

 

Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:

 

Attorney’s Email:

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,
Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules
of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20

, certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

 

LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
 

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
220 French Landing Drive, I-B
Nashville, TN 37243-1002
800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that
because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be
waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name: 2. Address:

 

 

3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:
5. Names and Ages of Ail Dependents:

Relationship:

 

 

Relationship:

 

 

Relationship:

 

 

Relationship:

 

 

6. lam employed by:

 

My employer’s address is:

 

My employer’s phone number is:

 

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFDC $ per month beginning
ssl $ per month beginning
Retirement $ per month beginning
Disability $ per month beginning
Unemployment $ per month beginning
Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning
Other $ per month beginning

 

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
9. My expenses are:

 

 

 

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: )
10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ __ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

 

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

 

 

 

 

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete
and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

 

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

 

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082