Court Opinion

ID: 7272612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:30:38.437255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:47.451045
License: Public Domain

CCA 1365. Review granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING THE DEFENSE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR VIOLATION OF APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL UNDER RCM 707.
II. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT’S WITHDRAWAL OF CHARGES AND RE-REFERRAL TO ANOTHER COURT-MARTIAL WAS IN VIOLATION OF RCM 604(b) BECAUSE THEY WERE PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN FOR AN IMPROPER REASON.
III. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE TWICE SUGGESTED IN FRONT OF THE MEMBERS THAT APPELLANT WAS GUILTY, FIRST BY “THANKING” A WITNESS FOR HIS EFFORTS TO PROTECT THE VICTIM, AND THEN BY ASKING DEFENSE COUNSEL BEFORE FINDINGS WHETHER A WITNESS WOULD BE SUBJECT TO RECALL AS A “SENTENCING WITNESS.”
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.