Court Opinion

ID: 6760943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:31:27.742204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:35.688465
License: Public Domain

Douglas, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Clementi v. Wean United, Inc. (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 342, 530 N.E. 2d 909, this case should be reversed on the authority of Dent v. AT&T Technologies (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 187, 527 N.E. 2d 821. It appears to me that this case and Dent are inapposite to Clementi — but then I readily admit that I do not understand Clementi.
Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.