Court Opinion

ID: 609937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:26:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:42.336432
License: Public Domain

996 F.2d 1213
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Amos Lee VAUGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,andWilliam Thomas Bland;  Roy Everett Bruce;  ShellyWashington;  Willie Wooten;  Nicholas SandersMoore;  Linwood Roger Riggs;  RogerLittles, Plaintiffs,v.Ernest R. SUTTON, Superintendent;  D. Nusemyer;  S. Johnson;Captain Hibbert;  Officer Shoupe;  OfficerSimmons, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6465.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 7, 1993.Decided:  June 29, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.  (CA-90-399)
Amos Lee Vaughan, Appellant Pro Se.
Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Amos Lee Vaughan appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Vaughan v. Sutton, No. CA-90-399 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED