Court Opinion

ID: 7354809
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 03:49:45.234643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:28.608004
License: Public Domain

GUY, J.
[ 1 ] Defendant appeals from a judgment by the court, acting without a jury, in favor of plaintiff for services of plaintiff and six *194assistant musicians, who, plaintiff alleges, were employed by defendant’s alleged agent, one Kelly, to furnish music at an entertainment given by defendant. Plaintiff proved the making of a contract with Kelly, and that on the evening in question he appeared with his assistants, tendered service, which was refused, and that he and his assistants were ejected from the premises. Kelly, called by plaintiff as a witness, merely testified to his conclusion that he had been authorized to act for defendant, but no competent proof was introduced of such authorization by the general committee of defendant or by any committee having power to act in the matter. Plaintiff then rested.
[2] Defendant called as a witness one of defendant’s general committee, who testified that no resolution had been adopted authorizing Kelly to act for defendant in the matter. At this juncture, the defendant’s case being still unfinished, the defendant having three more witnesses in court, who were subsequently called, the court interrupted the proceedings by stating, “I want to tell you I will believe Mr. Kelly’s testimony against your five witnesses,” to which statement defendant duly excepted. Three additional witnesses were then called by defendant, the case was closed, and subsequently the court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. It is clear that defendant was denied its day in court, and that the judgment cannot be permitted to stand.
The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.