Court Opinion

ID: 9962245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-23 14:00:50.380211+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:18.067571
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10701   Document: 16-1    Date Filed: 04/23/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 24-10701
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       JOHN DOE,
       a pseudonym,
                                                   Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       GUTTERIDGE JEANCHARLES, M.D., P.A.,
       a Florida Corporation,
       GUTTERIDGE JEAN-CHARLES,
       an individual,

                                               Defendants-Appellees.

                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-10701      Document: 16-1      Date Filed: 04/23/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  24-10701

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 6:24-cv-00034-WWB-RMN
                           ____________________

       Before BRANCH, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Appellant John Doe appeals directly from the magistrate
       judge’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed pseudony-
       mously. We lack jurisdiction to directly review a magistrate
       judge’s order, and an appeal from such an order must be taken to
       the district court first. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota
       Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982); United States v.
       Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.