Court Opinion

ID: 996651
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:56.702425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:42.288460
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7051

EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLES M. CONDON,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-98-142-3-17BC)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998           Decided:   October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ephrain Reliford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for recon-

sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Reliford v. Moore, No. CA-98-142-3-17BC (D.S.C. June 5 &

July 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2