Court Opinion

ID: 5744450
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:47:02.035126+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:07.891864
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J), rendered April 27, 2001, convicting him of gang assault in the first degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the defendant voluntarily made incriminating statements to police detectives after knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waiving his Miranda rights (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]). Accordingly, the hearing court correctly refused to suppress those statements (see People v Valverde, 13 AD3d 658, 659 [2004]).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find *703that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Lifson, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.