Court Opinion

ID: 3649393
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:04:31.790515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:11.145575
License: Public Domain

This is an action to recover damages for mental anguish, alleged  (316) to have been caused by the negligent failure of the defendant to deliver a telegram. At the conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiff, his Honor entered judgment of nonsuit, upon motion of defendant, and the plaintiff excepted and appealed.
Applying the rule that, upon a motion to nonsuit, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (Mizzell v. Mfg. Co.,158 N.C. 267), and that we cannot act upon the portions of the testimony of a witness which sustains the contention of the defendant, although they may impair the force of other statements made by him (Dail v. Taylor,151 N.C. 289; Hamilton v. Lumber Co., 156 N.C. 523), we are of opinion that it was error to enter judgment of nonsuit upon the plaintiff's evidence.
It was admitted that a telegram, addressed to the plaintiff at West Durham, was delivered to the defendant at Asheboro at 7:50 o'clock of the morning of 16 September, 1911, informing him of the death of his sister at Denton in Davidson County, and requesting him to come at once, and that the defendant undertook to transmit and deliver the same.
The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove that he was well known in West Durham; that he lived within one-fourth mile of the depot; that he was about his home during the morning, and that the telegram was not delivered to him until about 12 o'clock.
In the absence of any explanation, a delay of four hours in delivering a telegram from one point to another in the State, about one hundred miles apart, is some evidence of negligence. Meadows v. Telegraph Co.,132 N.C. 41. *Page 258 
The plaintiff also offered evidence tending to prove that if the telegram had been delivered promptly, he could and would have left Durham at 10 o'clock on the morning of 16 September, and would have arrived at Denton about 4:30 o'clock P. M. of the same day, before the funeral of his sister; that after the telegram was delivered, he could not reach Denton by rail in time to attend the funeral; that his physical (317) condition was such that he could not safely go from Durham to Thomasville on a later train and drive about seventeen miles to Denton, and that he suffered mental anguish.
He testified, among other things:
Q. Had you been to see your sister at any time recently before this message? A. Somewhere about five or six weeks.
Q. Was she sick at that time? A. Yes, sir.
Q. Where was she at the time you went to see her? A. At Mr. Putnam's.
Q. Where was that? A. At Denton, N.C.
Q. What train did you go on when you went to see your sister? A. On the evening train. I left West Durham somewhere about 10 o'clock in the morning.
Q. What time did you get to Denton? A. About 4:30 in the evening.
Q. How did you go? A. I went from here to Thomasville and changed trains there and went out on the Piedmont road.
Q. From here to Thomasville, what road do you travel on? A. On the Southern.
Q. What road from Thomasville to Denton? A. Piedmont road.
Q. Was there any other railroad there? A. No, sir.
Q. Did that road run on Sunday? A. No, sir.
Q. Was there any train that you could have reached Denton on before Monday after the morning train passed West Durham on Saturday morning? A. No, sir; not until 4:30 Monday evening.
Q. State whether or not, if you had gotten the telegram on Saturday morning before the west-bound train arrived, state whether or not you would have gone? A. Yes, sir; I would have gone as quick as I could get there.
Q. Could you have gone? A. Yes, sir; by rail.
Q. Did you have sufficient money to pay your way by rail? A. No, sir; but I could borrow it, I suppose, from others.
Q. Did you have some money? A. Yes, sir.
Q. Mr. Fuller asked you about the team. You said you never made a trip over that road? A. No, sir.
Q. What else did you say about the money to hire a team? (318) A. I didn't have it, though I could borrow it. I had just about enough to make railroad fare. *Page 259 
Q. What was your condition at that time as to sleep and health? Were you able to have made the trip at night if you had been there and had money to hire a team and could have gotten one? A. Not safely. I didn't want to undertake it.
Q. You don't know whether you could have succeeded or not? A. No, sir.
Q. State whether or not your failure to get to the funeral of your sister has caused you any mental suffering or anguish? A. Yes, sir; it certainly has.
There is also evidence on the part of the plaintiff which detracts materially from the evidence we have quoted, but we are not at liberty to rest our opinion upon contradictions in the evidence, as the law commits to the jury the duty of determining the weight that shall be given to the evidence.
Reversed.
Cited: Ridge v. R. R., 167 N.C. 521; Hadley v. Tinnin, 170 N.C. 86;Barnell v. Smith, 171 N.C. 537.