Court Opinion

ID: 9701275
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 22:13:41.101394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:22.000941
License: Public Domain

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J„
concurring in results only.
I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the Trial Court’s judgment not to enforce the Reconciliation Agreement. The basis for my affirmance, however, would be the Trial Court’s finding of “bad faith” by the Husband with regard to the Reconciliation Agreement. I believe the record more than adequately supports the Trial Court’s finding, and I believe the Reconciliation Agreement should not be enforced for that reason. I, however, do not agree with the majority’s holding that “a reasonable time for performance had passed when Wife initiated the instant divorce action” and, therefore, the Reconciliation Agreement was no longer enforee*596able by either party. The very event contemplated by the Reconciliation Agreement, “any subsequent Divorce Suit ... ”, has come to pass after performance by both parties when they reconciled. I agree with the majority that this contract should be evaluated under general contract principles. See Minor v. Minor, 863 S.W.2d 51, 54 (Tenn.Ct.App.1997). This being so, I see no reason that the mere passage of time after performance by the parties under the contract, their reconciliation, relieves Wife from this one particular term of the Reconciliation Agreement. As stated, I do concur with the majority’s ultimate decision affirming the Trial Court’s refusal to enforce the Reconciliation Agreement.