Court Opinion

ID: 7861692
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 17:55:35.157418+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:29:11.639091
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The habeas court denied the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his petition for certification to appeal to this court. After a careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); see also Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 432, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991).
The appeal is dismissed.