Court Opinion

ID: 8473122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 13:22:36.990945+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:22.199113
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Horton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Horton, No. 7:04-cr-00078-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009). We deny Horton’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.