Court Opinion

ID: 6029777
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:43:33.024838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:12.239391
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Smithtown Library Board of Trustees, dated January 21, 1997, which terminated the petitioner from his position as Director of the Smithtown Library, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered September 30, 1997, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that in a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination of an administrative board, a court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board or body it reviews unless the decision under review is arbitrary and capricious or constitutes an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231).
The determination of the respondent Smithtown Library Board of Trustees was based on several instances of misconduct by the petitioner in illegally promoting employees in contravention of the Civil Service Laws. Thus, the penalty of termination, when considered in light of all of the circumstances of this case, was not so dispproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra, at 234; Matter of Soss v Grant, 227 AD2d 494). Further, in this regard, a high degree of deference is to be accorded to an agency’s determination of the appropriate penalty to be imposed (see, Matter of Washington v Dolce, 208 AD2d 937).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.