Court Opinion

ID: 1004548
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:42:59.428034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:12.413833
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Melvin Sumler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Sumler,
  
  No. CR-96-116 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
   
   *321
   
  in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.