Court Opinion

ID: 4359351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-16 20:36:59.766392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:33.574699
License: Public Domain

People v Gomez (2019 NY Slip Op 00300)

People v Gomez

2019 NY Slip Op 00300

Decided on January 16, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 16, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-12199

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vPiero Gomez, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 10337/16)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Alice R. B. Cullina of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne Melendez, J.), imposed October 24, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid because the Supreme Court's oral colloquy improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights that are automatically forfeited by a plea of guilty (see People v Johnson, 165 AD3d 702; People v Ortizcora, 163 AD3d 1001, 1002). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court