Court Opinion

ID: 989491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:42.195975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:14.370540
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6142

SCOTT E. RING,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RON ANGELONE,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-96-1-MC-R)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                   Decided:   June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott E. Ring, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary in-

junction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Ring v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1-MC-R
(W.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2