Court Opinion

ID: 8681851
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:32:35.736785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.854468
License: Public Domain

*320Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX, 2016 WL 3997315 (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED