Court Opinion

ID: 9406725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-03 16:00:37.670766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:32.791093
License: Public Domain

FOR PUBLICATION

   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
        FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE                      No. 18-16700
ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ;
BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually             D.C. No. 4:16-
and as Administrator of the Estate of      cv-03282-DMR
Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE
HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ;
PAUL GONZALEZ,

            Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v.

GOOGLE, LLC,

            Defendant-Appellee.

      On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

                      Filed July 3, 2023

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan
               Christen, Circuit Judges.

                            Order
2                      GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE

                          SUMMARY *

                      Anti-Terrorism Act

    The panel remanded this case to the district court for
further proceedings consistent with Gonzalez v. Google
LLC, 143 S. Ct. 1191 (2023) (per curiam).

                           COUNSEL

Keith L. Altman (argued), The Law Office of Keith Altman,
Farmington Hills, Michigan; Daniel W. Weininger, Excolo
Law, Southfield, Michigan, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Reynaldo Gonzalez.
Robert J. Tolchin (argued) and Meir Katz, The Berkman
Law Office LLC, Brooklyn, New York, for Plaintiffs-
Appellants the Estate of Nohemi Gonzalez, Beatriz
Gonzalez, Jose Hernandez, Rey Gonzalez, and Paul
Gonzalez.
Brian M. Willen (argued), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati New York, New York; David H. Kramer and Kelly
M. Knoll, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto,
California; Lauren Gallo White, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, San Francisco, California; Paul Harold and Steffen
N. Johnson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Washington, D.C.; for Defendant-Appellee.

*
 This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has
been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
                   GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE                   3

Aaron D. Mackley and Sophia Cope, Electronic Frontier
Foundation, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae
Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Yavar Bathaee, Bathaee Dunne LLP, Austin, Texas; Brian J.
Dunne, Bathaee Dunne LLP, Los Angeles, California; for
Amici Curiae Artificial Intelligence Law and Policy
Institute.

                        ORDER

   This case is REMANDED to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme
Court’s opinion in Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 143 S. Ct. 1191
(2023) (per curiam).