Court Opinion

ID: 8476442
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:01:09.173873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:26.204322
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James E. Downing appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Downing, No. 4:05-cr-00052-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense *379with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.