Court Opinion

ID: 1000929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:48:21.35898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:17.206999
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RODERICK WILLIAMS, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CR-97-41-3, CA-99-3-4)

Submitted:   February 24, 2000             Decided:   March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Roderick Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.      See

United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-97-41-3; CA-99-3-4 (E.D. Va.

Sept. 22 & Oct. 25, 1999).   We deny leave to appeal in forma pau-

peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2