Court Opinion

ID: 993119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:02:50.43527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:53.647579
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL AARON LITTLE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-87-19-C)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997       Decided:   September 24, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Aaron Little, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Horn, III, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion under old FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Little, No. CR-87-19-C (W.D.N.C. June 16, 1997). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2