Court Opinion

ID: 8608817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:12:21.704948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.719354
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
We have reviewed petitioner’s response to this court’s order to show cause. We conclude that this petition for review should be summarily denied because petitioner’s second motion to reopen, filed more than two years after the final order of removal, violated both the numerical and time limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (providing that a party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings and that motion must be filed within 90 days after the date on which a final administrative decision was filed).
DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.