Court Opinion

ID: 7353215
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 03:08:19.526426+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:28.006262
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The question of contributory negligence and the negligence of the driver of defendant’s steam roller was one of fact. *1132and there is no sufficient reason shown for disturbing the judgment of the lower court in this respect. The evidence of the value of the use of plaintiffs taxicab during the time it was being repaired is insufficient to uphold the amount allowed therefor in the judgment. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff will stipulate, within five days after service of a copy of the order herein and notice of entry, that the judgment be modified, by reducing the same to the sum of $134.90, with appropriate costs in the court below, in which event the judgment, as modified, will be affirmed, without costs to either party of this appeal.