Court Opinion

ID: 9000869
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 13:02:29.05431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:11:09.620884
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Bernard J. Peters, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Gerard L. Goettel, Judge, affirming a judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Howard Schwartzberg, Judge, which held that fees owed to attorney Hennenhoeffer for his representation of Peters’ son were in the nature of support and thus nondischargeable debts within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5) (1988). Substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Goettel’s opinion, 133 B.R. 291 (S.D.N.Y.1991), including his reliance on In re Spong, 661 F.2d 6, 9 (2d Cir.1981) (“An award of attorney’s fees may be essential to a spouse’s ability to sue or defend a matrimonial action and thus a necessary under the law. ... [Djischargeability must be determined by the substance of the liability rather than its form.”), we affirm.