Court Opinion

ID: 9733950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:21:17.389127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:44.668784
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur with the majority that there is no verbatim record of the admonishment and waiver of counsel required by Rule 401(b). Reversal is, therefore, warranted on the DUI. (However, I do note that such a record would not be required had the State completely waived jail time on the offense, whether at sentencing or on revocation of supervision). However, I disagree that a Frye hearing is required on the HGN test. While the supreme court may not have spoken with one voice, the supreme court has, nonetheless, spoken. People v. Basler, 193 Ill. 2d 545, 740 N.E.2d 1 (2000).