Court Opinion

ID: 4449212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-23 15:04:04.937448+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:24.522178
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                       JAMES MARK BRANHAM,
                             Appellant,

                                      v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                                 No. 4D19-744

                           [October 23, 2019]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox and Dan L. Vaughn, Judges; L.T.
Case No. 312011CF001411A.

   Mark H. Klein of MHK Legal, PLLC, Coral Springs, for appellant.

   No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

    The order dismissing Appellant’s amended motion for postconviction
relief as untimely is affirmed. Appellant’s argument that the untimely
filing should be excused because he retained an attorney who failed to
timely file the amendment was not raised below and is not preserved for
appeal. The proper avenue for presenting such a claim is through a sworn
filing in the trial court, which can conduct an evidentiary hearing on the
issue if necessary. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(3); Steele v. Kehoe, 747
So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1999). Within the time remaining under the rule,
Appellant may file a properly sworn motion in the trial court seeking leave
to belatedly file the amended motion pursuant to rule 3.850(b)(3) and
Steele.

   Affirmed without prejudice.

LEVINE, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

                           *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.