Court Opinion

ID: 4375359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-08 17:02:43.940509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:40.347581
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    GEORGIA COLLARD,1                          §
                                               §
          Defendant Below,                     §   No. 72, 2019
          Appellant,                           §
                                               §   Court Below: Family Court
          v.                                   §   of the State of Delaware
                                               §
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                         §   File No. 1712010437
                                               §   Petition No. 18-38121
          Plaintiff Below,                     §
          Appellee.                            §
                                               §

                               Submitted: March 4, 2019
                               Decided:   March 8, 2019

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

                                       ORDER

         After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to

the Court that:

         (1)    On February 19, 2019, the appellant, Georgia Collard, filed a notice of

appeal from a Family Court order dated and docketed on January 18, 2019. Under

Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or

before February 18, 2018.

1
    The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
       (2)     The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Collard to show cause

why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In response to the notice

to show cause, Collard asserts that the appeal was timely filed because February 17,

2019 was a Sunday and February 18, 2019 was Presidents’ Day. Rule 11(a) provides

that if the last day of a time period prescribed by the rules falls on a Saturday,

Sunday, legal holiday, or other day on which the Clerk’s office is closed, then the

time period shall run until the end of the next day on which the Clerk’s office is

open. As used in Rule 11(a) “‘legal holidays’ shall be those days provided by statute

or appointed by the Governor or the Chief Justice of Delaware.”2 Presidents’ Day

is not designated a legal holiday.3 Collard is correct that January 18, 2019, the day

the Family Court order was entered, is not counted in the computation of time. The

period for appeal therefore began on January 19, 2019, and, because the thirtieth day

was a Sunday, ended on Monday February 18, 2019. The notice of appeal was

untimely filed on Tuesday February 19, 2019.

       (3)     Time is a jurisdictional requirement.4 A notice of appeal must be

received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period in

2
  SUPR. CT. R. 11(a).
3
   1 Del. C. § 501 (listing legal holidays); State of Delaware 2019 Holidays, available at
https://dhr.delaware.gov/labor/holidays/2019.shtml (same). See also David A. Bramble, Inc. v.
Old Republic Gen. Ins. Corp., 2017 WL 1047247 (Del. Mar. 20, 2017) (dismissing an appeal as
untimely filed when the last day of the appeal period fell on a Sunday and the notice of appeal was
filed the following Tuesday, the day after Presidents’ Day).
4
  Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).

                                                2
order to be effective.5 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a

timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, an untimely appeal

cannot be considered.6

         (4)     Collard has not demonstrated that her failure to file a timely notice of

appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. Consequently, this case does not

fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice

of appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that the appeal is DISMISSED.

                                               BY THE COURT:

                                               /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
                                                      Justice

5
    SUPR. CT. R. 10(a).
6
    Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).

                                                   3