Court Opinion

ID: 9652587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 17:27:16.55203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:52.608232
License: Public Domain

KENNEDY, District Judge
(concurring).
I concur fully in the opinion of Judge PHILLIPS, but may add that after all the matter before us is whether or not the trial court erred in refusing to allow the appellant to file its supplemental bill in the nature of a bill,of review which seeks to present matters pertinent to, but not presented by the issues as framed when the case was before the trial court or the appellate court, and wo are not now directly concerned with what disposition the trial court may make of the case upon those issues when and if joined; and, next, the matter to be determined seems important, because tho situation, suggests the taking of $50,000 from one litigant and giving it to another without .consideration and in the absence of terms of the original assignment being satisfied, which important and serious question will otPior-wise be disposed of merely upon the attempted analysis of voluminous and complex pleading’s.