Court Opinion

ID: 8600227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 21:29:36.483322+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:09.933787
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
Gamaliel Carrillo-Maravilla (Carrillo) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sen*628tence for illegal reentry following deportation. Carrillo argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).
Carrillo’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Carrillo contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Carrillo properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.