Court Opinion

ID: 9698762
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:59:31.444784+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:43.174787
License: Public Domain

KELLY, Judge,
concurring.
In light of the plethora of state and federal authorities collected by the majority which unequivocally establish that the content based prior restraint imposed in this case violat*468ed both the federal and Pennsylvania constitutions, I see no need to ground our decision on the fractured plurality decision in Willing v. Mazzocone, 488 Pa. 377, 393 A.2d 1155 (1978) (per Manderino, J.; Roberts, J., concurring, O’Brien, J., joins; Pomeroy, J., concurring; Eagen, C.J., dissenting; Nix and Larsen, JJ., noting dissent). I nonetheless, concur in the result.