Court Opinion

ID: 2894363
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 22:59:16.016496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:03.308006
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-04-00582-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 1, 2006

______________________________

GARY O. GARDNER, BEULAH DARLENE GARDNER,
AND HOLLISTER GARDNER, APPELLANTS

V.

LARRY PICKARD STEWART, SHERIFF OF SWISHER COUNTY, TEXAS
AND HONORABLE ED SELF, ACTING AS SWISHER COUNTY JUDGE
IN CAUSE NO. 1795, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NO. A10362-02-10; HONORABLE JACK D. YOUNG, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ. 
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
 Pending before this Court is appellee Larry Pickard Stewart's motion for continuance
on docket.  By letter of February 13, 2006, the Clerk of this Court notified pro se appellants
and counsel for Stewart that this appeal was set for submission upon oral argument on
Tuesday March 7, 2006.  No request for continuance or objection having been received,
on February 24, 2006, the docket for settings on March 7, 2006, was mailed to the parties
and appellee's counsel acknowledges receiving same on February 27, 2006.  Larry Pickard
Stewart's motion for continuance is overruled. (1)
 It is so ordered.  
							Per Curiam
1. The motion does not contain a certificate of conference as required by Rule
10.1(a)(5) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

>

	It is so ordered.  

							Per Curiam 
Do not publish.