Court Opinion

ID: 9889829
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-11 17:07:52.48842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:02.961289
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                     No. 22-0754
                               Filed October 11, 2023

CHARLES JONAS HASSELMANN,
    Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,
     Respondent-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Sarah Crane, Judge.

      An applicant appeals the dismissal of his application for postconviction

relief. APPEAL DISMISSED.

      Allan M. Richards, Tama, for appellant.

      Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Zachary Miller, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee State.

      Considered by Greer, P.J., and Schumacher and Ahlers, JJ.
                                          2

GREER, Presiding Judge.

       Charles Hasselmann appeals the district court’s dismissal of his application

for postconviction relief (PCR). Because Hasselmann’s notice of appeal was filed

thirty-one days after final judgment, and because he is not entitled to a delayed

appeal, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

       Hasselmann pled guilty to third-degree theft, an aggravated misdemeanor,

in violation of Iowa Code section 714.1 and 714.2(2) (2019) in August 2020.1 In

July 2021, Hasselmann filed this PCR application, challenging that guilty plea

based on equal protection grounds.            The State filed a motion to dismiss

Hasselmann’s PCR claim, and the PCR court issued its order granting the motion

on March 28, 2022.2 Hasselmann filed his notice of appeal of that order on

April 28, 2022, thirty-one days later. Our rules require an appeal of a final order in

PCR cases to be filed within thirty days of the filing of the final order. Iowa Code

§ 822.9 (2022) (applying the same deadlines for PCR actions as for appeals from

final judgments in criminal cases); Iowa R. App. 6.101(1)(b) (requiring notice of

appeal to be filed within thirty days). Thus, Hasselmann’s notice of appeal was

one day too late. Hasselmann urges us to review the merits of the appeal anyway

“based on fairness and justice.”

1 The underlying case was FECR331268.     Following Hasselmann’s guilty plea, the
district court sentenced Hasselmann to “2 years prison, concurrent to parole,
suspended, $625 fine, 15% surcharge, court costs, restitution (TBD).”
2 The PCR court reached this conclusion, largely, based on Hasselmann’s failure

to demonstrate that the State was treating “similarly situated persons differently.”
See generally Shearon v. Iowa Bd. of Parole, 872 N.W.2d 198 (Iowa Ct. App.
2015).
                                            3

        While Hasselmann’s appeal was pending, our supreme court decided

Jones v. State, 981 N.W.2d 141 (Iowa 2022). In Jones, the court held that delayed

appeals are not allowed in PCR proceedings. 981 N.W.2d at 143, 145. The court

further explained that “[o]ur rules require the notice of appeal to be filed within thirty

days.   That ends the inquiry.       This deadline imposes a limit on the court's

jurisdiction that we decline to extend . . . .” Id. at 147; see also Wright v. State, No.

22-0853, 2023 WL 3861921, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. June 7, 2023) (applying Jones

to a PCR action filed in May 2022). We are required to follow supreme court

precedent. State v. Beck, 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014) (“We are not

at liberty to overrule controlling supreme court precedent.”); State v. Hastings, 466

N.W.2d 697, 700 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990) (“We are not at liberty to overturn Iowa

Supreme Court precedent.”).         Therefore, this court is without jurisdiction to

entertain this untimely appeal, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

        APPEAL DISMISSED.