Court Opinion

ID: 2887735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 19:30:55.486768+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:23.148780
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-01-0086-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

FEBRUARY 25, 2002

______________________________

BEACH EXPLORATION, INC., APPELLANT

V.

BRADFORD L. MOORE AND McGOWAN & McGOWAN, P.C., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 121st DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;

NO. 15,345; HONORABLE MARVIN MARSHALL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
ON JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND TO ABATE 

APPEAL TO PERMIT INTERLOCUTORY ORDER TO BE MADE FINAL

	By opinion dated February 13, 2002, this Court examined its jurisdiction to hear this
appeal and after concluding that the February 6, 2001 summary judgment appealed from
was interlocutory, the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Citing Iacono v. Lyons,
6 S.W.3d 715 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.), by their joint motion, the parties
acknowledge that the judgment signed February 6, 2001, is not final, and pursuant to Rule
27.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure they request that we withdraw our opinion
and judgment of February 13, 2002, and abate the appeal and remand the cause to the
trial court so that a final judgment may be rendered. 
	  Concluding that the motion should be granted, we hereby withdraw our opinion and
judgment of February 13, 2002, and abate the appeal until Friday, April 26, 2002, and
remand the cause to the trial court so that the jurisdictional defect can be cured.  Upon
rendition of a final judgment, a supplemental clerk's record containing the final order should
be prepared and filed not later than April 26, 2002.  If a supplemental clerk's record is not
filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before April 26, 2002, the appeal will be subject to
dismissal without further notice for the reasons explained in our opinion of February 13,
2002.  
	It is so ordered.
							Don H. Reavis
							     Justice

Do not publish.

lant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw.  See Johnson v. State, 885
S.W.2d 641, 645 (Tex.App.-Waco 1994, writ ref'd).  We carried the motion for
consideration with the merits of the appeal.  Having done so and finding no reversible error,
appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the trial court's judgment is
affirmed.

						Mackey K. Hancock
						        Justice

Do not publish.