Court Opinion

ID: 9396689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-23 16:01:36.185188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:19.046784
License: Public Domain

U NITED S TATES A IR F ORCE
             C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
                          ________________________

                              No. ACM S32727
                          ________________________

                            UNITED STATES
                                Appellee
                                      v.
                      Lucas M. ANTONIEVICZ
              Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
                          ________________________

        Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
                           Decided 23 May 2023
                          ________________________

Military Judge: Christopher D. James.
Sentence: Sentence adjudged 27 April 2022 by SpCM convened at Minot
Air Force Base, North Dakota. Sentence entered by military judge on
26 May 2022: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 80 days, and for-
feiture of $500 pay per month for four months.
For Appellant: Major Kasey W. Hawkins, USAF; Major Abhishek S.
Kambli, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Thomas J. Alford, USAF; Captain
Olivia B. Hoff, USAF; First Lieutanant Deyana F. Unis, USAF; Mary
Ellen Payne, Esquire.
Before RICHARDSON, CADOTTE, and ANNEXSTAD, Appellate Mili-
tary Judges.
                          ________________________

    This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
    precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
                       ________________________
PER CURIAM:
   A special court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone convicted
Appellant, consistent with his pleas and pursuant to a plea agreement, of one
                 United States v. Antonievicz, No. ACM S32727

specification each of wrongful use of cocaine and wrongful use of ampheta-
mines (MDMA), a controlled substance, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Appellant personally raises
one issue: whether his sentence is unduly severe. We have carefully considered
this issue, and find no discussion or relief is warranted.
    The findings and sentence entered are correct in law and fact, and no error
materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of Appellant occurred. Articles
59(a) and 66(d), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d). Manual for Courts-Mar-
tial, United States (2019 ed.). Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AF-
FIRMED.

                    FOR THE COURT

                    CAROL K. JOYCE
                    Clerk of the Court

                                         2