Court Opinion

ID: 8137338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 18:00:21.29169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:27.201299
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-50981      Document: 00516465494         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/09/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                  September 9, 2022
                                  No. 21-50981
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Marcelino Medina-Rodriguez,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:13-CR-336-1

   Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Marcelino Medina-Rodriguez
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medina-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-50981    Document: 00516465494          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/09/2022

                                  No. 21-50981

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2