Court Opinion

ID: 6275448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 15:58:08.175398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:02.741999
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
The single matter assigned as error is the refusal of the court to charge, as requested in the defendant’s point, that under all the evidence in the ease the verdict should be for the defendant. Therefore it became necessary for the appellant to bring the evidence upon the record by bill of exceptions taken in the established form, or to have the same certified .by the judge in the mode prescribed in section 2, rule VI. But there is neither bill of exceptions sealed, nor certificate signed, by the judge. On the contrary, the judge, upon the appellee’s objection, refused to certify the transcript of the notes of testimony furnished by the official stenographer, because the application for such certificate was not made within the time prescribed by the rule of his court for the presentation of bills of exceptions. It is apparent, therefore, that in the present state of the record there is nothing before us to review, and that appellee’s motion to quash the appeal must prevail.
The appeal is quashed.