Court Opinion

ID: 9696359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 18:45:45.330231+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:21.677973
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Wright, J.:
The factual situation in the case at bar differs from that in Commonwealth v. Carrasquilla, 191 Pa. Superior Ct. 14, 155 A. 2d 473, cited by the majority. This appeal is governed by our subsequent decision in Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 65, 195 A. 2d 177, which is not cited by the majority. I have some familiarity with these two cases since I wrote the opinion in each. In the case at bar I agree with Judge Bertolet that the evidence in the record was sufficient to go to the jury. I would therefore affirm the judgment.
Ervin, P. J., and Flood, J., join in this dissenting opinion.