Court Opinion

ID: 9858046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 16:12:58.327196+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:01:29.878437
License: Public Domain

On Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing
McGILL, Justice.
That portion of the majority opinion beginning with the paragraph in the middle of page 7 thereof [244 S.W.2d 253] “Ap-pellee’s position may be most strongly stated”, etc., to the word “whole” in the third line of page 8 thereof was inserted for the purpose of stating the views of Associate Justice SUTTON. At that time Justice SUTTON had not prepared his dissenting opinion. Since appellees -have objected to this portion of the majority opinion and Justice SUTTON has expressed his views more accurately -in his dissenting opinion, the portion of the majority opinion above referred to and the word “however” immediately following are withdrawn.
Appellee’s motion for a rehearing is overruled.