Court Opinion

ID: 8421345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 21:19:22.518994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:23.485699
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from a bankruptcy court order entered on March 18, 2008. Our review of the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Homeside Lending, Inc., Nos. CA-03-319-2; BK-02-72575-DHA (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2003). We deny Broadnax’s motions to supplement the record and for judicial review and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED