Court Opinion

ID: 3337198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:50:06.51428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:10.331019
License: Public Domain

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
It may be, as the plaintiff claims, that the defendant's son committed the acts complained of in November, 1997. However, there is no evidence that the son was the agent of the mother in s doing in November, and the law provides that he is not necessarily his mother's agent. Carrier v. Donovan, 88 Conn. 37,40, 89 A. 894 (1914). If the plaintiff's personality was removed in November, 1997, she has not shown that there is probable cause that the defendant removed it. The personality that was removed on CT Page 5430 and after December, 1997 was removed after the plaintiff had abandoned or vacated the premises.
The court finds that the plaintiff has not shown that there is probable cause that a judgment will be rendered in her favor, the application for a prejudgment remedy is denied.
BY THE COURT,
Bruce L. Levin Judge of the Superior Court