Court Opinion

ID: 2815463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-08 19:37:30.62977+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:49.970378
License: Public Domain

People v Rosas (2015 NY Slip Op 05967)

People v Rosas

2015 NY Slip Op 05967

Decided on July 8, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 8, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2013-05033
 (Index No. 6321/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v Jonathan Rosas, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Adam M. Koelsch of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed March 18, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., RIVERA, HALL, HINDS-RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court