Court Opinion

ID: 8621297
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 09:07:46.106706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:31.047852
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Lauro Placido Balbuena and Eva Placido seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003).
We do not consider petitioners’ contention regarding physical presence because their failure to establish hardship is dis-positive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.