Court Opinion

ID: 3071276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:34:26.519759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:48.716864
License: Public Domain

In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                        Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
                                 ________________________

                                      No. 07-14-00337-CR
                                      No. 07-14-00338-CR
                                 ________________________

                           STACIE ANN KENEMORE, APPELLANT

                                                 V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                          On Appeal from the 108th District Court
                                   Potter County, Texas
     Trial Court Nos. 66,764-E & 66,765-E; Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding

                                        September 23, 2014

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
                      Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

      In 2013, Appellant, Stacie Ann Kenemore, was convicted of theft, a state jail

felony,1 in cause numbers 66,764-E and 66,765-E. She was sentenced to two years

confinement and assessed a $1,000 fine, suspended in favor of community supervision

for five years. On May 28, 2014, the trial court entered judgments revoking Appellant’s

      1
          TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(e)(4) (West Supp. 2014).
community supervision and assessing the original sentences of two years confinement

in each cause, with the sentences to run concurrently. The trial court entered a Trial

Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal in each cause indicating Appellant

has a right of appeal, and counsel was appointed to represent her on appeal. The

limited documents before us reflect that motions for new trial were not filed.          On

September 5, 2014, appointed counsel filed notices of appeal in each cause.             We

dismiss these purported appeals for want of jurisdiction.

       The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a

notice of appeal is not timely filed, a court of appeals has no option but to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id. When, as here, no motions for new trial were filed,

the notices of appeal were required to be filed within thirty days after the day Appellant’s

sentences were imposed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The deadline could have been

extended if, within fifteen days of the deadline, Appellant had filed the notices with the

trial court clerk and had also filed motions for extensions of time in compliance with Rule

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. This Court has no authority to invoke Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure to enlarge the time in which to file a notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 2;

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       The judgments in these appeals reflect that Appellant’s sentences were imposed

on May 28, 2014. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on or before June 27,

2014. Even applying the fifteen day extension period to the due date, the last possible

                                             2
date to file the notices was July 14, 2014.2 The notices filed on September 5, 2014, fall

outside that deadline. Appellant’s untimely filed notices of appeal prevent this Court

from acquiring jurisdiction over these appeals.3

        Consequently, these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                          Patrick A. Pirtle
                                                              Justice

Do not publish.

        2
         The fifteenth day fell on Saturday, July 12, 2014, and was extended to Monday, July 14, 2014,
per Rule 4.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
        3
         Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014).

                                                     3