Court Opinion

ID: 9940808
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-15 16:03:07.511047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:45:56.897936
License: Public Domain

Supreme Court of Florida
                             ____________

                          No. SC2024-0053
                            ____________

          IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING
                   THE FLORIDA BAR 11-1.8.

                          February 15, 2024

PER CURIAM.

     We amend, on our own motion, Rule Regulating The Florida

Bar 11-1.8 (Continuation of Practice Program After Completion of

Law School Program or Graduation). 1

     As Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 11-1.1 (Purpose) explains,

this Court adopted the rules governing the law school practice

program “[a]s one means of providing assistance to lawyers who

represent clients unable to pay for legal services and to encourage

law schools to provide clinical instruction in trial work of varying

kinds.” We now have determined that it would be beneficial to

extend the maximum term of certification for the continuation of

    1. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.; see also R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 1-12.1.
the practice program under the supervision of a Florida Bar

member after graduation from law school and to permit these

certified legal interns three opportunities to pass the Florida bar

examination before certification is terminated. This change is

intended to assist in the “avowed quest for experienced persons,

while affording protection to the public.” Fla. Bar re Amends. to R.

Regulating Fla. Bar, 635 So. 2d 968, 969 (Fla. 1994).

     Accordingly, rule 11-1.8 is amended as reflected in the

appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by

underscoring in the appendix, and the deletions are indicated by

struck-through type. The amendments are effective immediately.

Because the amendments were not published for comment

previously, interested persons shall have seventy-five days from the

date of this opinion in which to file comments with the Court. 2

       2. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before
April 30, 2024, as well as a separate request for oral argument if
the person filing the comment wishes to participate in oral
argument, which may be scheduled in this case. If filed by an
attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must
be electronically filed via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (Portal).
If filed by a nonlawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in
Florida, the comment may be, but is not required to be, filed via the
Portal. Any person unable to submit a comment electronically must
mail or hand-deliver the originally signed comment to the Florida

                                 -2-
     It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and
SASSO, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

LABARGA, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

     While I agree with the substance of the rule change extending

a law school graduate’s maximum term of certification from twelve

to eighteen months and permitting where necessary a third

administration of the Florida bar examination, I again dissent to the

Court’s adoption of this amendment on its own motion.

     Recently, I expressed my concern about this Court’s “pattern

of [sua sponte] rule amendments.” In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of App.

Proc. 9.130, 48 Fla. L. Weekly S257, S257 (Fla. Dec. 14, 2023)

(Labarga, J., dissenting). Even where, as here, a rule change is

unlikely to be controversial, I think the better practice in all but the

Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 South Duval Street,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927; no additional copies are required
or will be accepted.

                                  -3-
most urgent instances is for this Court to publish proposed rule

amendments for comment before adoption.

     I reaffirm my concern that a “retroactive comment period . . .

does not always reflect the most efficient nor the most effective way

of fully incorporating the input of relevant entities.” Id. Indeed, it is

possible that this practice has a chilling effect on the submission of

comments for the Court’s consideration, and in my experience, the

input of interested persons and entities is of great use to this Court

in considering rule amendments.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules Regulating The Florida Bar

                                  -4-
                             Appendix

RULE 11-1.8. CONTINUATION OF PRACTICE PROGRAM AFTER
COMPLETION OF LAW SCHOOL PROGRAM OR GRADUATION

     (a)-(b) [No Change]

      (c) Term of Certification. The maximum term of certification
for graduates is 1218 months from the date of graduation.

      (d) Termination of Certification. Failure to take the next
available Florida bar examination, failure of any portion of the
Florida bar examination on the secondthird administration if a
secondthird administration is required, or denial of admission to
The Florida Bar terminates certification under this rule.

     (e) [No Change]

                                -5-