Court Opinion

ID: 9774677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 18:29:26.703527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:26.328870
License: Public Domain

BURGESS, Justice,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. The majority holds, under point of error number three, that there were no factual issues raised under appellant’s counterclaim. I disagree. The counterclaim was not pending at the time the motion for summary judgment was filed. The counterclaim plead that the letter agreement was induced by fraud. Appellee never filed an amended motion addressing this issue. Thus, this summary judgment did not dispose of all the issues and is not appealable. Teer v. Duddlesten, 664 S.W.2d 702, 704 (Tex.1984). I would dismiss the appeal. Since the majority does not, I respectfully dissent.