Court Opinion

ID: 7273367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:32:01.836397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:47.703336
License: Public Domain

CCA 201400379. On further consideration of the record and the pleadings, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF THE CRIME CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY,” WHERE SUCH AN INSTRUCTION IS IN VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES v. MARTIN LINEN SUPPLY CO., 430 U.S. 564, 572-73 (1977), AND THERE IS INCONSISTENT APPLICATION BETWEEN THE SERVICES OF THE INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO WHEN MEMBERS MUST OR SHOULD CONVICT AN ACCUSED.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.