Court Opinion

ID: 7932771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:06:16.514703+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:24.946020
License: Public Domain

Campbell, C. J.
Plaintiffs sued defendants before a justice, and obtained judgment, which included an item of $21 for a barrel of pork, and did not allow a certain small set-off. Instead of appealing, defendants brought certiorari to the circuit court of Isabella county, when the court affirmed the judgment.
So far as the set-off is concerned, there was testimony on both sides, and the justice acted upon it. His conclusion could not be disputed on certiorari.
The item of $21 was proved by entries in plaintiff’s books. He produced them, and swore that he posted the charge in the usual course from the day-book into the ledger, but that the day-book charge was made by another person in his employ, who was not sworn.
The court below declined to review this question, because, as it stood, it might better have been raised on appeal, when, if there was any dispute of fact, it could be disposed of on the merits.
It does not appear from the record that the objection now made was presented to the justice before the testimony was closed. The testimony introduced, unless objected to, proved the claim, and it does not appear to have been objected to. Whether admissible without some further proof we shall not discuss, as, if the objection had been seasonably made, it very probably would have been obviated by further proof.
Cases ought not, in fairness, to be brought up on certiorari *223for such questions of evidence as could be rectified on appeal, and the statute does not contemplate the reversal of judgments on technicalities when no injustice appears. Here, as the record comes up, there is no error, technical or otherwise, which should be considered.
The judgment must be affirmed.
The other Justices concurred.