Court Opinion

ID: 990855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:27:54.565881+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:45.848106
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PATRICK LAWSON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
96-145-S, CR-89-362-PN)

Submitted:   November 7, 1996          Decided:     November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lawson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Clayton White, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Lawson, Nos. CA-96-145-S;
CR-89-362-PN (D. Md. May 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2