Court Opinion

ID: 1950272
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:53:54.996034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:03.192451
License: Public Domain

398 Pa. 546 (1960)
Commonwealth
v.
Soudani, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Appeal allowed March 28, 1960.
March 28, 1960.
Before JONES, C.J., BELL, MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, BOK and EAGEN, JJ.
Marjorie Hanson Matson, for appellant.
*547 Eugene G. Kitko, Assistant District Attorney, with him Joseph S. Ammerman, District Attorney, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, March 28, 1960:
Appellant, Sami H. Soudani, was found guilty in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Clearfield County and sentenced to 1 1/2 to 3 years on a charge of aggravated assault and battery (misdemeanor) and sentenced to 3 1/2 to 7 years on a charge of assault with intent to kill (felony), both sentences to run concurrently. In addition, a fine of $1,000 was imposed on the second count. Both judgments of sentence and fine were affirmed by the Superior Court. Since both charges arise out of the same transaction, differing merely in degree,[1] only one penalty can be imposed after conviction of both. Commonwealth v. McCusker, 363 Pa. 450, 70 A.2d 273 (1950). To hold otherwise would contravene the intent of the legislature and impose double *548 punishment for the same crime.[2] The sentence of relator on his conviction of aggravated assault and battery is set aside. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.
NOTES
[1]  Where grievous bodily harm has resulted from an assault, as it has in this case, a charge of aggravated assault and battery (Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 709, 18 P.S. § 4709) is a lesser included offense within a charge of assault with intent to kill. (Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 710, 18 P.S. § 4710). The general rule is well-settled that upon an indictment charging a particular crime, the defendant may be convicted of a lesser offense included within it. This is so even though the greater offense charged be a felony and the lesser included offense a misdemeanor. Hunter v. Commonwealth, 79 Pa. 503 (1875). The exception to this rule is that on an indictment for murder, the jury is not permitted to return a verdict either for involuntary manslaughter or for any degree of assault and battery. See Commonwealth v. Comber, 374 Pa. 570, 97 A.2d 343 (1953); Commonwealth v. Komatowski, 347 Pa. 445, 453, 32 A.2d 905 (1943); Commonwealth v. Adams, 2 Pa. Super. 46 (1896). Thus, even without joinder of the count for aggravated assault and battery, the jury would be permitted to convict defendant on this lesser included charge.
[2]  For other cases so holding, see Commonwealth ex rel. Shaddock v. Ashe, 340 Pa. 286, 17 A.2d 190 (1940) (counts of assault and battery with intent to commit rape and aggravated assault and battery held included within a count of rape); Commonwealth ex rel. Russo v. Ashe, 293 Pa. 322, 142 A. 317 (1928) (count of assault with intent to maim held included within count of assault with intent to murder); Commonwealth ex rel. Tokarchik v. Claudy, 174 Pa. Super. 509, 102 A.2d 207 (1954) (count of aggravated assault and battery held included within count of assault with intent to ravish).