Court Opinion

ID: 103057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:54:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:14.136167
License: Public Domain

304 U.S. 548
58 S. Ct. 1047
82 L. Ed. 1520
John M. HUGHES, appellant,v.WISCONSIN TAX COMMISSION, F. V. Haboeck, Assessor of  Income, et al.
No. 996.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 23, 1938

Mr. S. W. Jensch, of Hudson, Wis., for appellant.
Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt, of Madison, Wis., for appellee.
For opinion below, see 278 N.W. 403.
PER CURIAM.

1
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Power Co., 252 U.S. 341, 344, 40 S. Ct. 330, 331, 64 L. Ed. 601; Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357, 360, 47 S. Ct. 641, 642, 71 L. Ed. 1095; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U.S. 692, 700, 49 S. Ct. 457, 460, 73 L. Ed. 903; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U.S. 642, 58 S. Ct. 58, 82 L.Ed. ——. (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U.S. 276, 279-281, 52 S. Ct. 556, 557, 76 L. Ed. 1102, 87 A.L.R. 374; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 U.S. 308, 313, 57 S. Ct. 466, 467, 81 L. Ed. 668, 108 A.L.R. 721.

2
Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 58, 83 L.Ed. ——.