Court Opinion

ID: 609890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:26:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:18:48.977763
License: Public Domain

996 F.2d 1211
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Albery W. PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lieutenant WATERHOUSE, Head Nurse;  Chuck Moore, JailAdministrator;  Newport News Sheriff Department;Clay Hester, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6324.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 7, 1993.Decided:  June 24, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-1789-AM)
Albert W. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert De Hardit Hicks, Martin, Hicks & Ingles, LTD., Gloucester, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Albert W. Pearson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Pearson v. Waterhouse, No. CA-91-1789-AM (E.D. Va.  Mar. 8, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED