Court Opinion

ID: 9961940
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-22 08:10:29.482304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:19:34.704718
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued April 18, 2024

                                      In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The

                          First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00662-CV
                            ———————————
           IN RE YOLTZIN MARIELLA HOLLIBAUGH, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator Yoltzin Mariella Hollibaugh filed a petition for writ of mandamus

challenging a temporary order entered by the trial court on August 25, 2023. 1 The

temporary order was entered in a modification suit and prevented relator from

moving with the minor child to Mexico. On December 1, 2023, real party in

interest David Michael Wise filed a motion to dismiss the mandamus petition as

1
      The underlying case is In the Interest of [name redacted], A Child, cause number
      2018-00554, pending in the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the
      Honorable Angela Harrington presiding.
moot. On December 4, 2023, Wise filed an amended motion to dismiss. Wise

stated in the motion’s certificate of conference that, after conferring with relator’s

counsel, he understood that relator’s counsel and the amicus attorney agree with

the motion. No opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed.

      A case becomes moot if there is no longer “a justiciable controversy

between the parties—that is, if the issues presented are no longer ‘live,’ or if the

parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Heckman v. Williamson

Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). “If a proceeding becomes moot, the court

must dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction.” In re Salverson, No. 01-12-

00384-CV, 2013 WL 557264, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 14,

2013, orig. proceeding) (citing Heckman, 369 S.W.3d at 162)).

      Wise states that the trial court held a trial of the underlying case from

November 6–8, 2023 and rendered a ruling as shown by the attached docket sheet.

Moreover, the Court notes that relator has now filed an appeal from the trial court’s

final judgment signed on January 3, 2024.

      We grant the motion and dismiss the mandamus petition. Any other pending

motions are also dismissed as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.

                                          2