Court Opinion

ID: 988679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:55:42.468473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.444956
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-7660

VINCENT EUGENE WILLIAMS,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN P. METZGER,     III,   Chairman;   VIRGINIA
PAROLE BOARD,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-95-410)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996           Decided:    February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Eugene Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed
the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no rever-

sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magis-

trate judge. Williams v. Metzger, No. CA-95-410 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

    *
      The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988).

                                2