Court Opinion

ID: 2891550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 21:43:22.583653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:45.421760
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-05-0222-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 1, 2005

______________________________

RANDY BRAZEAL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 47
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 16,715-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant, Randy Brazeal, appeals his theft conviction.  However, the record does not contain a certification of his right to appeal as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).  By letter dated September 9, 2005, this court notified the trial court, the district clerk, the district attorney and appellant’s attorney of this omission and the need for the certification.  More than 45 days have lapsed since all were notified of these circumstances, and the certification has yet to be filed.  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.  
See
 
Tex. R. App.
 
P. 
25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right to appeal has not been made part of the record).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.