Court Opinion

ID: 9838333
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-06 00:00:29.665351+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.887818
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10058         Document: 00516883851             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/05/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10058
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                              September 5, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Thomas Joseph Banno,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:21-CR-480-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit
   Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Joseph Banno has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Banno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10058     Document: 00516883851          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/05/2023

                                   No. 23-10058

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2