Court Opinion

ID: 993030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:01:40.168274+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.315543
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7040

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JIMMIE LEE SWANN,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief
District Judge. (CR-89-140, CA-95-9-1-V)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997        Decided:   September 18, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Lee Swann, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court.   United   States   v.    Swann,   Nos.   CR-89-140;   CA-95-9-1-V

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996).       See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997
WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                     2