Court Opinion

ID: 7343257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 00:15:16.312955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:16.887826
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This is an action by real estate brokers to recover commissions for effecting a sale of property belonging to the defendant. At the close of the evidence in behalf of the plaintiffs, a motion to dismiss the complaint was made and granted. We think that this disposition of the case was correct, inasmuch as the plaintiffs had failed to prove that they were the procuring cause of the sale. It was error, however, to render a judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits. The New York Municipal Court Act provides that, where the plaintiff does not prove his cause of action, the judgment must be that the action be dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to a new action. Laws 1902, p. 1561, c. 580, § 248. A judgment of dismissal on the merits can be granted only where, at the close of the whole case, the court is of opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover as matter of law, or where the court sustains a demurrer and no leave to plead over is granted. Id. § 249.
The judgment must be modified by striking out the words “on the merits,” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “without prejudice to a new action,” and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.