Court Opinion

ID: 5691391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:27:28.497377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:09.022145
License: Public Domain

Crew III, J.E
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered August 1, 2003 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
Defendant was observed on Dana Avenue in the City of Albany drinking beer from a bottle. He was arrested for violating the City of Albany’s open container ordinance, and a subsequent search of his person revealed nine pieces of crack cocaine. As a consequence, defendant was indicted and charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees. Following a Dunaway/Mapp hearing, where defendant unsuccessfully sought to suppress the cocaine, he pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of SVa to 7 years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, where, as here, the police arrest a person for an offense committed in their presence, they are justified in conducting a search incident to that arrest (see People v Pantusco, 107 AD2d 854, 855-856 [1985] [search incident to arrest for violation of open container ordinance]).
Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.