Court Opinion

ID: 9964632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-30 16:00:38.235677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:38.121756
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-1413     Document: 010111040569       Date Filed: 04/30/2024    Page: 1
                                                                                   FILED
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                           April 30, 2024
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-1413
                                                 (D.C. No. 1:23-CR-00031-GPG-JMC-1)
  CLINT WHITEFEATHER LANER,                                    (D. Colo.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                          _________________________________

 Before MORITZ, CARSON, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.
                   _________________________________

       Clint Whitefeather Laner pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a

 convicted felon, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and received a 48-month prison sentence.

 He then appealed from that sentence. His plea agreement contains an appeal waiver

 which the government now moves to enforce under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d

 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc). In response, Mr. Laner’s counsel states he

 “has fully discussed the government’s Motion with Mr. Laner, including his rights

 and options in responding to it,” and “Mr. Laner does not object to the government’s

 Motion.” Resp. at 1.

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Appellate Case: 23-1413   Document: 010111040569       Date Filed: 04/30/2024   Page: 2

       In light of Mr. Laner’s non-opposition, we grant the government’s motion to

 enforce and dismiss this appeal.

                                          Entered for the Court

                                          Per Curiam

                                          2