Court Opinion

ID: 576861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:48.101475
License: Public Domain

955 F.2d 43
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Timothy Lamont WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Doctor D. BARNES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-7325.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.Decided Feb. 14, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.   James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge.  (CA-91-15-AM)
Timothy Lamont Williams, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Timothy Lamont Williams filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis.   The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with  Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order.   Plaintiff appeals.   Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.