Court Opinion

ID: 989717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:11:03.259356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:42.057891
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 96-6349

JOHN NATHAN QUIDLEY,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

W. O. LEARY,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-96-141-BO)

Submitted:     June 20, 1996                 Decided:   July 2, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Nathan Quidley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Quidley v. Leary, No. CA-96-141-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2