Court Opinion

ID: 2939515
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 20:11:11.768989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:03.370601
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-66,577-01

NICOLAS SANCHEZ, A.K.A. NICOLAS GARCIA, Relator

v.

DALLAS DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NOS. W00-70743-S(A) AND W03-33033-S(A) IN THE 282ND JUDICIAL
DISTRICT COURT
FROM DALLAS COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in
the 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the
applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District Clerk of 
Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such
habeas corpus applications; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); by stating that the
nature of the claims asserted in the applications filed by Relator is such that the claims are not
cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3; or stating that Relator has not filed any
applications for habeas corpus in Dallas County.  This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus
shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response.  Such response
shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: January 24, 2007
Do not publish