Court Opinion

ID: 2926912
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:42:02.985029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:19.963491
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00066-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
ALDO MARTIN NAVA, 	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee. 
_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, Aldo Martin Nava, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for
assault.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
	Sentence in this matter was imposed on October 23, 2008.  Counsel filed a motion
for new trial, and notice of appeal was filed on January 28, 2009.  On February 11, 2009,
the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely
perfected and that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten
days from the date of receipt of the Court's directive.  Appellant has not filed a response
to the Court's directive.  
 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when
notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended
in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Where
a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days
after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).  The
time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline
for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule
10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  See id. 26.3.  
 Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial.  Therefore, his notice of appeal was due
to have been filed on or before January 21, 2009.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). 
Although the notice of appeal herein was filed within the 15-day time period for filing a
motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, no such motion for extension of time
was filed.  See id. 26.3. 	
	This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed
notice of appeal.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  "When a
notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of
time is filed, the appellate court  lacks jurisdiction."  Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.   Absent a
timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the
merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.
1998).  
	Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of
habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability
of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.
art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1999).
	The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 											PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 4th day of June, 2009.