Court Opinion

ID: 2953769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 23:26:43.957649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:50.269286
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                               ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

                                       NO. 03-11-0067-CV

                                    Ruth Wheeler, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                 John Collier Hinson, Appellee

               FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
        NO. C-1-CV-10-00825, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               We withdraw the opinion and judgment issued herein on May 19, 2011, and substitute

the following opinion in place of the earlier one.

               Appellant Ruth Wheeler field her notice of appeal on February 7, 2011. On

February 22, 2011, this Court received notice that although Wheeler was found not indigent, she

continued to request the district clerk’s office of Travis County to prepare a free record. On

February 23, 2011, this Court received a copy of a district court order sustaining a contest to

Wheeler’s affidavit of inability to pay costs. Wheeler has not challenged this order.           On

April 26, 2011, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Wheeler requesting that she make arrangements

for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal. The Clerk also notified

appellant that her appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution if she did not respond to this

Court by May 6, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b) (appellate court may dismiss appeal for want of
prosecution if appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the

clerk’s record unless appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs). On May 6, 2011,

Wheeler filed a letter with this Court stating that she has not made arrangements for the clerk’s

record and suggesting that she does not intend to unless this Court assures her that it has jurisdiction

to address the merits of her appeal. Because Wheeler has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay

the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record and is not entitled to proceed without payment of

costs, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                                _____________________________________________

                                                J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution on Motion for Rehearing

Filed: July 13, 2011

                                                   2