Court Opinion

ID: 4311075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-11 00:01:20.331347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:24.155281
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-51067      Document: 00514634858         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/10/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-51067
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        September 10, 2018
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

EZEQUIEL RUEDA-SAENZ,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                                No. 4:17-CR-227-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ezequiel Rueda-

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-51067    Document: 00514634858    Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/10/2018

                                No. 17-51067

Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rueda-Saenz has not filed a response.

      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2