Court Opinion

ID: 2930965
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:02:43.791687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:33.892491
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29,
2005.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-05-00016-CR
____________
 
DENWITE ZACK
WILLIAMS, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 338th District
Court
Harris County,
Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
993,193
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
possession of less than one gram of cocaine. 
On December 8, 2004, after completion of a Presentence Investigation
Report, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for three years in
the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely, written notice of
appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal
is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, more than forty-five days have elapsed and no pro se response has been
filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed September 29, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice
Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).