Court Opinion

ID: 2925747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:26:26.695046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:34.519661
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00166-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN RE: GARRETT PAVING & MAINTENANCE, INC.

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Motion for Stay

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion (1) Per Curiam

	Relator, Garrett Paving & Maintenance, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for stay in the above cause on March 31, 2008. 
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for stay, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief
sought.  
	Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are DENIED. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

								PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 1st day of April, 2008.
 

 
1.   See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).