Court Opinion

ID: 5613514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:09:21.824861+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:10.898147
License: Public Domain

Bloodworth, J.
The petition in this ease sets out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

The demurrer was on the grounds: (1) No cause of action is set out. (2) The allegations of paragraph 6, as to the manner in which the forge was upset, are too vague and indefinite. (3) It is not shown what caused the forge to become upset and fall on the plaintiff. (4) There are no facts alleged that show that negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury.
Hitch & Denmark, David S. Atkinson, for plaintiff in error,
cited: 140 Ga. 459-60; 21 Ga. App. 412; 25 Ga. App. 794; 21 Ga. App. 379 (1), and cit.; 146 Ga. 300; Civil Code (1910), § 4509; 103 Ga. 847-9; 12 Ga. App. 286, 290; 6 Ga. App. 30G; 17 Ga. App. 707; 22 Ga. App. 557; 23 Ga. App. 753; 114 Ga. 390; 131 Ga. 791 (2); 115 Ga. 1009.
Gignilliat & O’Neal, J. S. Harrison, Thomas F. Walsh Jr., contra,
cited: 87 Ga. 692; 29 Cyc. 630 (III); 116 Ga. 152; 80 Ga. 114; 108 Ga. 805; 62 Ga. 685; 105 Ga. 135; 118 Ga. 651; 92 Ga. 727; 2 Ga. App. 79.