Court Opinion

ID: 4326893
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-01 17:51:01.951117+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:58:53.002165
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                       San Antonio, Texas
                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                          No. 04-17-00635-CR

                                       Juan Guzman ZUNIGA Jr.,
                                               Appellant

                                                     v.

                                          The STATE of Texas,
                                                Appellee

                      From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                    Trial Court No. 2006CR5239
                             Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2018

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           This is an attempted appeal from the trial court’s failure to rule on an untimely-filed motion

for new trial.

           Appellant Juan Guzman Zuniga Jr. was convicted of sexual assault in September 2007, and

this court affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. See Zuniga v. State, No. 04-07-00729-CR, 2008
WL 4163224 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2008, pet. stricken) (not designated for

publication). In September 2016, Zuniga filed a motion for forensic DNA testing and a motion to

appoint counsel. The trial court denied the request for counsel on March 14, 2017, and denied the
                                                                                         04-17-00635-CR

motion for post-conviction DNA testing on April 17, 2017. Zuniga timely appealed, and this court

subsequently affirmed the trial court. See Zuniga v. State, No. 04-17-00370-CR, 2018 WL 280521

(Tex. App.—Jan. 3, 2018, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). On June 2, 2017,

while the appeal was pending, Zuniga filed an untimely motion for new trial in the trial court,

asking the court to reconsider its rulings on his request for counsel and DNA testing. The trial

court did not rule on the motion, and Zuniga filed the instant notice of appeal in September 2017,

complaining of the court’s failure to rule.

       A defendant in a criminal action has a right to appeal a final judgment of conviction and

orders made appealable by statute. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App.

2008). The appealable order in Zuniga’s post-conviction DNA proceeding was the order denying

the motion for post-conviction DNA testing, which was the subject of Appeal No. 04-17-00370-

CR. There is no further final judgment or appealable order in that proceeding that Zuniga may

appeal, and he has therefore failed to properly invoke the jurisdiction of this court.

       We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                  PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                 -2-