Court Opinion

ID: 4465946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-19 19:00:18.608556+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:23.167386
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-50406      Document: 00515243275         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/19/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 19-50406
                                                                              FILED
                                                                       December 19, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

RAMON UMBERTO CORTEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                                No. 4:18-CR-910-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Cortez-

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-50406   Document: 00515243275     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/19/2019

                                No. 19-50406

Rodriguez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. Califor-
nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.
2011). Cortez-Rodriguez has not filed a response.

     We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2