Court Opinion

ID: 8453722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:41:17.36001+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.917160
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM ***
William Molina-Ochoa appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Molina-Ochoa’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Molina-Ochoa the opportunity to file a pro se *783supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.