Court Opinion

ID: 1008137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:49.161562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:27.718710
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6718

TYWANN D. SMITH,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RANDALL E. LEE; MICHAEL R. MILLS; NANCY B.
HARDY; WILLIAM MAYO; LUTHER GLOVER, III; FLOYD
HENDRICKS; DANIEL JONES,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-67-5-BR)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tywann D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Buren Riley Shields, III, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tywann D. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Smith v. Lee, No. CA-01-67-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2002).       We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2