Court Opinion

ID: 3283983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:58:21.240203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:35.446662
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM CASES.
[1] This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff's motion to tax costs and with two minor exceptions the facts appearing from the transcript are the same as those in City ofLos Angeles, Plaintiff, v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, JuliaFanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [299 P. 807], this day decided. The two exceptions are: (1) The motion to tax costs was based upon three grounds only, the fourth ground, that of attorneys' fees being excessive, being omitted in the instant cause, and (2) the motion was not supported by an affidavit such as is found in the Fanta case, supra. The points of *Page 757 
law urged by the appellant, however, are identical and this appeal is determined by the opinion therein.
Order affirmed.
Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.