Court Opinion

ID: 7577868
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:24:07.562912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:53.595432
License: Public Domain

The trial court's final judgment in this cause, declaring the City of Tuskegee's annexation ordinances 84-1, 84-2, and 86-23 invalid on the authority of City of Fultondale v. City ofBirmingham, 507 So.2d 489 (Ala. 1987), is affirmed. For the retroactive application of City of Fultondale, see City ofBirmingham v. Blount County, 533 So.2d 534, 537 (Ala. 1988). See, also, City of Birmingham v. Smith, 507 So.2d 1312 (Ala. 1987).
The jurisdiction of the trial court to adjudicate all matters relating to the terms and conditions of its order of stay pending appeal is not affected by this Court's judgment of affirmance.
AFFIRMED.
MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.