Court Opinion

ID: 7361013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-27 00:00:18.129964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:34.202005
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10071      Document: 00516408134         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/26/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                    July 26, 2022
                                  No. 22-10071                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jessica Medina,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:21-CR-36-1

   Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Stewart and Willett, Circuit
   Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jessica Medina
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medina has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10071     Document: 00516408134          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/26/2022

                                   No. 22-10071

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2