Court Opinion

ID: 1004523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:42:28.303801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:12.310579
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT WILLIAM LAWHORN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-93-233, CA-00-555-1)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                   Decided:   May 29, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert William Lawhorn, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert William Lawhorn seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Lawhorn, Nos. CR-93-233; CA-00-

555-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2001; entered Jan. 23, 2001).    We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2