Court Opinion

ID: 9957844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-05 15:01:19.475347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:52.439158
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-1990   Document: 60     Page: 1   Filed: 04/05/2024

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

  SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,
                  Appellants

                            v.

                      HULU, LLC,
                        Appellee
                 ______________________

                  2022-1990, 2022-1991
                 ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
 00298, IPR2021-00304.
                  ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

    STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons,
 VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES
 CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW,
 RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG,
 KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.

    BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers
 LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also repre-
 sented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN;
Case: 22-1990     Document: 60   Page: 2   Filed: 04/05/2024

 NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San
 Francisco, CA.
                ______________________

 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

 ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

     PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit
 Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                         ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 5, 2024
   Date