Court Opinion

ID: 9430973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:31:02.497359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:26.559949
License: Public Domain

Justice Brennan,
with whom Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun join, concurring.
I find nothing in today’s opinion that would limit Andrus v. Allard, 444 U. S. 51 (1979), to its facts. Indeed, largely for reasons discussed by the Court of Appeals, I am of the view that the unique negotiations giving rise to the property rights and expectations at issue here make this case the unusual one. See Irving v. Clark, 758 F. 2d 1260, 1266-1269, and n. 10 (CA8 1985). Accordingly, I join the opinion of the Court.