Court Opinion

ID: 7217205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 02:36:34.340912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:17:03.568237
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Lindsay Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to quash a John Doe summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, and denying her motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Does, No. CA-02-42-MC (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 20, 2002; entered Dec. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.