Court Opinion

ID: 6263473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 22:48:22.147539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:45.336796
License: Public Domain

ZAPPALA, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent. I would grant the petition for review and reverse the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.
The record is devoid of any evidence which would establish a reasonable basis for permitting the joinder of an additional defendant more than five (5) years after service upon the original defendant. Examination of the record before the Court demonstrates an absolute abuse of discretion by the lower court in permitting the joinder.
Furthermore, the lower court’s conclusion that the Petitioners would not be prejudiced by the joinder is belied by the record itself. The record indicates that the Petitioners’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs in the present action was granted because the statute of limitations had run prior to commencement of the litigation. *620Joinder will nevertheless expose Petitioners to financial liability in the nature of the contribution.
NIX, C.J., joins in this dissenting statement.