Court Opinion

ID: 680240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:34:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:37.588257
License: Public Domain

37 F.3d 1493NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David S. DAVIS, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY;  R.A. Young;  R.J. Beck;  Janet Salyer;Ray Barrett, Correctional Officer;  E.C. Morris,Deputy Director, Virginia Department ofCorrections, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6681.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-426-R)
David S. Davis, appellant pro se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Davis v. Murray, No. CA-93-426-R (W.D.Va. June 2, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.