Court Opinion

ID: 686962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:37:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:41:26.234772
License: Public Domain

45 F.3d 428NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Charles Courtland SMITH, a/k/a Deanie Smith, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted November 15, 1994.Decided January 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CR-89-424-H, CA-93-2619-H)
Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Gerald T. Zerkin & Associates, Richmond, VA;  Robert Kline, Freedman & Kline, Reistertown, MD, for appellant.  James G. Warwick, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Smith, Nos.  CR-89-424-H;  CA-93-2619-H (D. Md. Feb. 23, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED