Court Opinion

ID: 8836688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 16:26:54.356112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:05.410547
License: Public Domain

Sawyer, J.,
(offer stating the facts as above.") In Look Tin Sing’s Case, 10 Sawy. 353, 21 Fed. Rep. 905, after a full argument by able counsel, and careful consideration by the court, Mr. Justice Field, with the concurrence of the circuit and district judges, held that a person born in the United States, of Chinese parents not engaged in the diplomatic service of any foreign government, is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and is a citizen thereof, under the provisions of the fourteenth amendment to the national constitution. As such citizen, it was further held that he was not subject to the Chinese restriction laws, and could not be excluded from this country. I am still satisfied with this ruling; but, if I were in doubt, I should not presume to overrule Mr. Justice Field upon a question which he has so maturely considered, and decided. If the point was erroneously decided, then children of Caucasian parentage, born under similar circumstances, are not citizens; and hundreds of thousands have, for years, been, unlawfully, enjoying and exercising all the rights of citizens, civil and political. The decision in that case controls these cases, which are similar to it. The petitioners are citizens, and are not, and they cannot be, excluded from the United States under the provisions of the late act in question. They are, therefore, illegally restrained of their liberty, and must be discharged, and it is so ordered.