Court Opinion

ID: 9400038
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-07 08:09:23.406778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:41.816965
License: Public Domain

In the
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                   No. 06-23-00100-CR

       DENEEKO TRAVON SHAVERS, Appellant

                            V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

         On Appeal from the 102nd District Court
                 Bowie County, Texas
             Trial Court No. 22F1020-102

      Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
        Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin
                                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

           Deneeko Travon Shavers pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance in an amount

greater than four grams but less than two hundred grams.1 Pursuant to a plea bargain with the

State, Shavers was sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment.2 The trial court certified that this

was a plea-bargain case and that Shavers had no right of appeal; nonetheless, Shavers, acting pro

se, filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that we are without jurisdiction over this case due

to the plea bargain between Shavers and the State, we dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.3

           The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases.

Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:

                  (2)   . . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s
           plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the
           punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a
           defendant may appeal only:

                    (A)     those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
                            before trial,

                    (B)     after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or

                    (C)     where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court that Shavers

either (1) filed a motion that was ruled on before trial or (2) obtained the trial court’s permission

1
    TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(d) (Supp.).
2
    Shavers’s punishment range was enhanced to that of a first-degree felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §12.42(b).
3
In conjunction with the plea agreement, Shavers waived his right of appeal. In addition, Shavers’s notice of appeal
was untimely.
                                                          2
to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court’s certification of Shavers’s right of appeal indicates

that he has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s

certification indicates no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

       We informed Shavers of this apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his appeal and

afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Although Shavers

responded to our letter, his response failed to convince this Court that it has jurisdiction over this

attempted appeal.

       Because Shavers has no right of appeal due to his plea bargain with the State and because

the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we dismiss

this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                               Jeff Rambin
                                               Justice

Date Submitted:        May 31, 2023
Date Decided:          June 1, 2023

Do Not Publish

                                                  3