Court Opinion

ID: 9406782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-03 18:01:01.425808+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:33.285846
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40762         Document: 00516807318             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/03/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                                             FILED
                                       No. 22-40762                                       July 3, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                            Clerkn
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jose Sustaita-Lara,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Eastern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:20-CR-224-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Elrod, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Sustaita-
   Lara has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Sustaita-Lara has not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40762    Document: 00516807318         Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/03/2023

                                 No. 22-40762

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2