Court Opinion

ID: 2962709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:00:58.553355+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:36.978455
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          June 22, 1994         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                                                                      ____________________        No. 93-1556                                     GARY GROWE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                            MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC.,                           FORSTER MANUFACTURING CO., INC.                               AND FRASER PAPER, LTD.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                                                                      ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                                                                      ____________________                                Selya, Cyr and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                                                                      ____________________             Paul O. Taylor, Alan D. Harris and Harris & Taylor,  on brief for             ______________  ______________     _______________        appellant.             John J. O'Leary, Jr., James M. Saffian, Pierce, Atwood, Scribner,             ____________________  ________________  _________________________        Allen, Smith  & Lancaster,  Joseph Michael Roberts,  Grove, Jaskiewicz        _________________________   ______________________   _________________        and Cobert, on brief for appellees.        __________                                                                                      ____________________                                                                                      ____________________                    Per  Curiam.   In view  of the  opinion entered  by the                    Per  Curiam.                    ___________          United  States Supreme Court in Security Services, Inc. v. K-Mart                                          _______________________    ______          Corp., No. 62 U.S.L.W. 4329 (May  16, 1994), the decision of  the          _____          United  States District Court for  the District of  Maine is sum-          marily affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.                            ___                                          2