Court Opinion

ID: 571702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:14:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:52.435057
License: Public Domain

948 F.2d 1281
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Gregory MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Sewall SMITH;  Attorney General of the State of Maryland,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7658.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.Decided Nov. 18, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-91-1375-JFM)
Gregory Marshall, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Gregory Marshall appeals from the district court's order dismissing his petition without prejudice to his right to refile under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) on the appropriate forms.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Marshall v. Smith, No. CA-91-1375-JFM (D.Md. June 3, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.