Court Opinion

ID: 8438012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:30:39.597122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.705869
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr-00402-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*450terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.