Court Opinion

ID: 2849748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 22:14:45.593195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:57:33.652504
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-05-406-CV

VINCENT NEIL PINNER	APPELLANT

V.

SNOWE RAY PINNER	APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 322
nd
 DISTRICT COURT 
OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM
 
OPINION
(footnote: 1) 
AND JUDGMENT

----------

On July 21, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by T
EX.
 R. A
PP.
 P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  
See
 T
EX
. R. A
PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this 
appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED:  August 10, 2006

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.