Court Opinion

ID: 52633
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:17:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:20.080671
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                   FILED
                                                                 October 3, 2007
                                 No. 06-51698
                              Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL SERNA

                                            Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Texas
                         USDC No. 5:06-CR-301-ALL

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Michael Serna presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d
240, 242-44 (5th Cir. 1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the
felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States
v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). Although Serna argued in a
supplemental brief that his prior Texas convictions for delivery of cocaine are not

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                               No. 06-51698

controlled substance offenses, he has since supplemented the record with
documents that he concedes establish that the convictions are controlled
substance offenses.   The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                    2