Court Opinion

ID: 9670898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:27:54.320402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:07.116392
License: Public Domain

Ryan, J.
I dissent.
My examination of the extradition documents satisfies me that the requisite jurisdictional fact in question, that the plaintiff is alleged to have performed acts in Michigan "intentionally resulting in a crime” in Maryland, is adequately alleged. That allegation appears explicitly in the Maryland state’s attorney’s application for requisition and in the Michigan Governor’s warrant. The absence of that explicit assertion in the Maryland Governor’s extradition request, and in the affidavit of the Maryland state police officer, is not, in light of the foregoing, jurisdictionally fatal to the Michigan Governor’s unreviewable discretionary decision to order the plaintiffs extradition.
Boyle, J., concurred with Ryan, J.