Court Opinion

ID: 4076433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-30 15:16:51.553005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:34.742713
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                    FILED
                                                                                September 30, 2016

JAMES R. FRYE,                                                                RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

                                                                            SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Claimant Below, Petitioner                                                      OF WEST VIRGINIA

vs.)   No. 15-1081	 (BOR Appeal No. 2050455)
                   (Claim No. 2014022480)

HUNTINGTON ALLOYS CORPORATION,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
        Petitioner James R. Frye, by Edwin Pancake, his attorney, appeals the decision of the
West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Huntington Alloys Corporation, by
Jillian Moore, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated October 7, 2015, in
which the Board affirmed an April 20, 2015, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s August 8, 2014,
decision suspending Mr. Frye’s temporary total disability benefits. The Court has carefully
reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is
mature for consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

       Mr. Frye injured his lower back on January 30, 2014, while carrying materials used to
contain an oil spill. He filed an application for workers’ compensation benefits and his claim was
held compensable for a lumbosacral sprain. Additionally, the claims administrator determined
that he was initially eligible for temporary total disability benefits from February 4, 2014,

                                                1
through February 17, 2014.1 Following the compensable injury, Mr. Frye received treatment
from Allen Young, M.D., who prescribed a course of physical therapy. On June 9, 2014, Dr.
Young documented in a treatment note that Mr. Frye’s lower back symptoms were recently
exacerbated during a physical therapy session, during which Dr. Young believed an
inexperienced physical therapist over-manipulated Mr. Frye’s spine.

        Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on June 26,
2014, and authored a report memorializing his findings on June 27, 2014. He opined that Mr.
Frye has reached maximum medical improvement with respect to the compensable injury, and
further opined that Mr. Frye can return to work without restrictions. Dr. Mukkamala also opined
that Mr. Frye suffers from pre-existing degenerative spondyloarthropathy that was documented
via diagnostic imaging, which has delayed his recovery.

        On July 29, 2014, Dr. Young submitted a request for authorization of temporary total
disability benefits in which he indicated that Mr. Frye was temporarily totally disabled from July
15, 2014, through September 15, 2014. The claims administrator suspended Mr. Frye’s
temporary total disability benefits on August 8, 2014, following its June 25, 2014, letter
indicating that Mr. Frye must provide medical evidence of his ongoing disability within thirty
days in order to continue to be eligible to receive temporary total disability benefits. In its Order
affirming the August 8, 2014, claims administrator’s decision, the Office of Judges held that the
claim was properly closed for temporary total disability benefits. The Board of Review affirmed
the reasoning and conclusions of the Office of Judges in its decision dated October 7, 2015. On
appeal, Mr. Frye asserts that the evidence of record demonstrates that he is entitled to additional
temporary total disability benefits.

        West Virginia Code § 23-4-7a (2005) states that temporary total disability benefits are
not payable after a claimant has reached maximum medical improvement, is released to return to
work, or actually returns to work, whichever occurs first. As was noted by the Office of Judges,
Dr. Mukkamala found that Mr. Frye had reached maximum medical improvement with respect to
the compensable injury as of June 26, 2014, even when taking into consideration the alleged
exacerbation of Mr. Frye’s condition which occurred during a physical therapy session in early
June of 2014. Because Dr. Mukkamala found that Mr. Frye had reached maximum medical
improvement more than one month prior to the claims administrator’s suspension of Mr. Frye’s
temporary total disability benefits, pursuant to West Virginia Code § 23-4-7a Mr. Frye is not
entitled to further temporary total disability benefits.

1
  The record is unclear regarding the duration of any additional temporary total disability benefits
that Mr. Frye may have received, although it does appear that he did receive additional
temporary total disability benefits beyond those initially awarded.
                                                 2
        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: September 30, 2016

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

                                                3