Court Opinion

ID: 39278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:23:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:24.351931
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 17, 2005

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 03-50972
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

YASSER RIVERA,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                   USDC No. DR-03-CR-299-1-AML
                       --------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Yasser Rivera appeals from his conviction of importing five

kilograms or more of cocaine and possessing with intent to

distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine.    Rivera contends

for the first time on appeal that his sentence violated the Sixth

Amendment because it was based on over 50 kilograms of cocaine,

more than the five kilograms of cocaine alleged in the indictment

and found by the jury.

     The district court plainly erred by basing Rivera’s sentence

on the extra verdict factual finding that more than 50 kilograms

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-50972
                               -2-

of cocaine were involved in Rivera’s offense.   See United States

v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005).   However, Rivera has not

demonstrated that the result likely would have been different but

for the district court’s error, had the district court sentenced

him under an advisory guideline sentencing scheme.   See United

States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 522 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for

cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

     AFFIRMED.