Court Opinion

ID: 90475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:02:34+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:30.410673
License: Public Domain

104 U.S. 441 (____)
VIGEL
v.
HOPP.
Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. Saul S. Henkle for the appellant.
There was no opposing counsel.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit in equity begun by the appellee to set aside a deed executed by her to the appellant, on the ground that the deed, though absolute on its face, was intended only as security for a debt, which has since been paid in full. There are numerous allegations of fraud, but the whole scope and purpose *442 of the suit is to establish a trust, and get back the property in that way. The answer denies every allegation of fraud and trust, and insists that the deed was intended as an absolute conveyance, and not as security. This is responsive to the bill, and before the relief can be granted which is asked, these denials must be overcome by the satisfactory testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness corroborated by circumstances which are equivalent in weight to another. 2 Story, Eq., sect. 1528. The appellee is the only witness in support of the bill, and the corroborating circumstances are not, in our opinion, sufficient to overcome the answer. It will serve no useful purpose to enter into analysis of the testimony.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the bill.