Court Opinion

ID: 9832244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:45:19.402602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:44.747171
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We did not discuss the allowing of attorneys’ fees against a foreign corporation. The group policy issued to appellee’s employer is claimed to have been consummated beyond the bounds of Texas. The policy issued to the appellee under and as a part of said group policy and without which appellant did not insure appellee, was issued in Forth Worth, Tex., and there ‘delivered. Such policy so delivered to ap-pellee is subject to the laws of Texas providing for attorneys’ fees. This rule was fully discussed by us in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Worton, 70 S.W.(2d) 216, and writ was refused by the Supreme Court.
The motion is overruled.