Court Opinion

ID: 7075751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 08:13:32.813363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:45.711380
License: Public Domain

ORDER SUSPENDING THE RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA
On October 24, 2003, this Court ordered the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to respond to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against him. The order required that the respondent show cause in writing within 10 days of service of the order.
The Court finds that the respondent has not submitted a response to the Order to Show Cause dated October 24, 2008. Accordingly, the Court finds that the respondent should be suspended immediately from the practice of law in Indiana pursuant to Admis.Disce.R. 23(10)(f).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent, Martin H. Kinney, is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately. Pursuant to Ad-mis.Disce.R. 28(10)(f)(4), the suspension shall continue until: 1) the Executive See-retary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that he has cooperated with the investigation; 2) the investigation or any related disciplinary proceedings that may arise from the investigation is disposed; or 3) until further order of this Court.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to give notice of this action pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc.R. 23(8)(d) and to provide to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Cireuit, to the clerks of each of the United States District Courts in this state, and the clerks of the United States Bankruptey Courts in this state the respondent's last known address as reflected in the records of the Clerk of this Court.
All Justices concur.