Court Opinion

ID: 2648649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-01-09 16:21:05.678556+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:42.752036
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

      IN RE AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
              ______________________

                      2013-1393
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 95/001,263.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    CYRUS A. MORTON, Robins, Kaplan, Miller, and Ciresi,
L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant.
Of counsel on the brief was TIMOTHY G. NEWMAN, Larson
Newman, LLP, of Austin, Texas.

    SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, Office of
the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor Commis-
sioner for Patents. With him on the brief were NATHAN K.
KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Asso-
ciate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit
Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2014                /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                     Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court