Court Opinion

ID: 9911509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-20 07:08:09.204214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:41.000186
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed December 18, 2023

                                       In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00984-CV

                  IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Relator

          Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-19065

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove
                           Opinion by Justice Molberg
      In its October 5, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges a trial

court’s order denying its motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Ken Molberg/
230984f.p05                              KEN MOLBERG
                                         JUSTICE

                                      –2–