Court Opinion

ID: 989619
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:09:48.168093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:41.860536
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-1323

MELANIE WOODEN,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIE MAE OLIVER; CITY OF NORFOLK,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-96-244-2)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                 Decided:   June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melanie Wooden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her multiple civil claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Wooden v. Oliver, No. CA-96-244-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2