Court Opinion

ID: 2963985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:18:31.891057+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:32.676099
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          March 29, 1996
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-2000

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                              EX. REL. JONATHAN R. REES,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                            YOLANDA LUGO-RAMIREZ, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

                  [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
                                               ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Johathan R. Rees on brief pro se.
            ________________

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  Appellant's argument that the district
                      __________

            court erred in failing  to hold an evidentiary  hearing which

            it had scheduled  on demand by appellant and  which appellant

            then  refused  to attend,  is  frivolous.   After  a  careful

            review, the judgment  of the district  court is affirmed  for
                                                            ________

            substantially  the reasons  stated in  its order  of July  7,

            1995.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
                   ___

                                         -3-