Court Opinion

ID: 9906426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-02 02:00:37.844249+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:22.654422
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-30416    Document: 00516987470       Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/01/2023

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                              ____________                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                               No. 23-30416                       December 1, 2023
                             Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                             ____________                                 Clerk

   Lindsey Lee; Wayne Ballard, Jr.; Jennifer Ballard;
   Ronald Roberts, III; Kathryn Roberts; Zachary
   Russell; Lacey Russell; Luis Hinostroza; Tim Addison,
   II; Stacy Addison; Jonathan McMorris; Gilbert
   Bankston, III,

                                                        Plaintiffs—Appellants,

                                    versus

   D.R. Horton, Incorporated; D.R. Horton, Incorporated
   - Gulf Coast; Acadian Trace HOA, Incorporated;
   George Kurz; Jake Lambert; David Stanton;
   Productions Builder Services, Incorporated, doing business
   as Carter & Clark,

                                          Defendants—Appellees.
                 ______________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 3:21-CV-442
                 ______________________________
Case: 23-30416       Document: 00516987470             Page: 2      Date Filed: 12/01/2023

                                        No. 23-30416

   Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          We AFFIRM the district court’s order for the reasons stated in the
   order. However, we VACATE the dismissal with prejudice and instruct the
   district court on remand to dismiss the subject claims without prejudice. See
   Johnson v. Pettiford, 442 F.3d 917, 918–19 (5th Cir. 2006).

          _____________________
          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
   should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
   forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

                                                  2