Court Opinion

ID: 5768609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:27:43.939443+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:43.267459
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to compel the issuance of a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 15, 1968, which denied appellants’ motion to dismiss the petition and remanded the matter to the appellant Board of Appeals for a hearing. Judgment affirmed, with costs. If the facts alleged in the petition be true, petitioner would be entitled to the relief requested (Matter of Mandalay Constr. v. Eccleston, 9 A D 2d 918; cf. Matter of Bexson v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 28 A D 2d 848, 849, affd. 21 N Y 2d 961; Kilfeather v. Town Bd. of Town of Hempstead, 43 Misc 2d 328, 330). As indicated by Special Term, the identity or lack of it between the instant application and the prior application cannot be determined on this record. The Board of Appeals may determine that question preliminarily and either (1) close-the hearing after stating on the record its findings and conclusions as to the identity of the two applications or (2) proceed to determine the application on its merits (Matter of Shields v. Sahm, 14 Misc 2d 102, affd. 8 A D 2d 823). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.