Court Opinion

ID: 8480188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:14:36.376321+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.689118
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carl L. Gilmore appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his “motion for a certifícate of appealability,” and “motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Gilmore v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:09-cv-00641-HEH (E.D.Va. Feb. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.