Court Opinion

ID: 9600261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:25:28.743003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:47.951559
License: Public Domain

WADE, Justice
(concurring).
I concur with Mr. Justice HENRIOD’s opinion. However, I do not want to be understood as holding that the evidence here was not sufficient to support a finding that all of the officers participated in this sale. I think that the fact that the trial court found that Hall, the secretary, participated in this sale, and that the other officers did not, when the only thing which he did different than the other officers was to receipt for the purchase price arid issue the stock certificate, indicates that the trial court considered that those additional acts made him a participant in the sale. Since such acts were only ministerial, they do not show that the secretary was a participant in the sale, although the other officers were not.