Court Opinion

ID: 9681765
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:56:14.735893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:35.772695
License: Public Domain

On Motions For Rehearing.
The statement in the original opinion that the description of the land involved in the tax case, as shown in Volume 368 at page 529 of the Deed Records of Eastland County, was not shown in the record is incorrect. The opinion is incorrect in the statement that it was shown that Mrs. Neill inherited Mr. Harvey’s community interest in the land. The record does not disclose whether Mr. Harvey died testate or intestate and, if testate, that he devised such interest to his wife.
There is evidence indicating this land was sold'under the tax judgment by the *207sheriff to Garner and that Garner discharged the judgment. If these facts were conclusively shown, nevertheless, the record does not disclose whether the sale to Garner was before or after the sale to Kimbrough.
The motions for rehearing are overruled.