Court Opinion

ID: 8679949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:31:35.820384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.433557
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Teresa Oxendine Bell appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits.* Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See. Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s judgment. Bell v. Colvin, No. 7:13-cv-00261-RN, 2015 WL 1186344 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.