Court Opinion

ID: 1001783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:00:45.025952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:20.374913
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LLOYD LENWOOD WALKER,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-95-84, CA-98-779-7)

Submitted:   May 25, 2000                   Decided:   June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Lenwood Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lloyd Lenwood Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-95-84;

CA-98-779-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2000).       We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2