Court Opinion

ID: 4664545
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-03 17:00:34.151759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:02.024777
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-12317    Date Filed: 03/03/2021   Page: 1 of 2

                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 20-12317
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 3:19-cr-00089-TKW-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

STEPHANNIE N. MACNEW,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.
                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (March 3, 2021)

Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 20-12317      Date Filed: 03/03/2021   Page: 2 of 2

      Sheryl Lowenthal, counsel for Stephannie MacNew in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and MacNew’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2