Court Opinion

ID: 4050648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 01:20:47.45388+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:09.912672
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-15-00553-CR

                               COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                       CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

CYNTHIA LORENA GONZALEZ,                                               Appellant,

                                               v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
                  Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Cynthia Lorena Gonzalez, filed a notice of appeal on September 24,

2015. Appellant sought to appeal an order entered on September 23, 2015, denying her

motion to suppress.       Our review of the documents before the Court shows that

appellant’s case is still pending in the trial court.
       On November 23, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared

that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order, and

requested correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed.

Appellant has not responded to the Court’s notice.

       Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.

State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d
160, 161 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). An adverse ruling on a pretrial motion

such as a motion to suppress is not a final appealable judgment. Apolinar v. State, 820
S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appellant may challenge the denial of a

motion to suppress as part of the appeal from the conviction.

       The Court is of the opinion that we do not have jurisdiction over an appeal from the

denial of a pretrial motion to suppress. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for want

of jurisdiction.

                                                                      PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
10th day of December, 2015.

                                            2