Court Opinion

ID: 609915
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:26:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:25.605070
License: Public Domain

996 F.2d 1212
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Scott Lewis RENDELMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Carlos ORTIZ, Warden;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6048.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  March 1, 1993.Decided:  June 29, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-92-2779-JFM)
Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Scott Lewis Rendelman appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Rendelman v. Ortiz, No. CA-92-2779-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 23, 1992).*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Because the record contains Rendelman's response to the motion to dismiss, we deny his motion to stay proceedings in this Court