Court Opinion

ID: 2950251
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:38:27.969097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:01.329483
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,531-01

                    EX PARTE PAUL ARRON LANDRENEAU, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 1400711-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance with the intent to deliver and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did

not appeal his conviction.

        Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because a post-guilty

plea laboratory report found no controlled substances in the seized evidence. The trial court adopted

Applicant’s and the State’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that
                                                                                                       2

we grant relief. The trial court found that the laboratory analysis in Applicant’s case did not indicate

the presence of any controlled substance or dangerous drug. According to the report forwarded with

the record, however, 26.71 grams of methamphetamine were found.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443
S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334
S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

26.71 grams of methamphetamine mentioned in the laboratory report were the basis for Applicant’s

conviction in cause number 1400711. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
                               3

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 16, 2015
Do not publish