Court Opinion

ID: 8155664
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:41:00.183242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:36.687879
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. (2) Escanaba & Lake Michigan Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 688-689; Permoli v. First Municipality, 3 How. 589, 610; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 223 U. S. 390, 401. (3) Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U. S. 294, 296; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 217.