Court Opinion

ID: 9456659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 19:59:44.888508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:04.048107
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for rehearing and of the suggestion for a rehearing en banc;
Now, therefore, with the concurrence and approval of the other members of the panel, and in the absence of a request for a poll of the entire court as provided by Appellate Rule 35(b);
It is adjudged and ordered that the National Labor Relations Board’s petition for a rehearing is denied.
Upon consideration of Union Carbide Corporation’s petition for a rehearing addressed to the panel;
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge
(dissenting on denial of rehearing).
I see no ground for a reconsideration of Mullins’ discharge. It was found not to be an unfair’ labor practice, and properly so, I think.
To the refusal of the Court to grant the respondent a rehearing as to Moss and Withrow, I renew the dissent I noted to the first opinion in this case. I now again express disapproval of the reinstatement and backpay allowed these two employees.