Court Opinion

ID: 9819476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 06:26:10.041046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:56.860578
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE KNECHT, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. I believe the thoughtful analysis in Adamczyk v. Township High School District 214, 324 Ill. App. 3d 920, 755 N.E.2d 30 (2001), is persuasive and not at odds with Sylvester and Bubb. Adamczyk is factually consistent with this case. Not all public school property is immunized by section 3 — 106. A school parking lot is not recreational property simply because a student worker who is assisting the football team walks across it or a spectator sits in the lot to watch football practice. I would reverse. APPENDIX [[Image here]]