Court Opinion

ID: 9865567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 19:01:06.537832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:50:04.336079
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11026   Document: 16-1    Date Filed: 09/25/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-11026
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       In re: ALBERTO SOLAR SOMOHANO,
                                                              Debtor.
       ________________________________________________
       ALBERTO SOLAR-SOMOHANO,
                                                   Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,

                                                 Defendant-Appellee.
USCA11 Case: 23-11026      Document: 16-1     Date Filed: 09/25/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-11026

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                     D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-20299-RNS
                           ____________________

       Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The district court’s order denying as moot Alberto Solar-So-
       mohano’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is not a
       final, appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Gomez v. United States,
       245 F.2d 346, 347 (5th Cir. 1957) (stating that an order denying a
       motion to appeal in forma pauperis is not a final, appealable order).
       The proper procedure for review of such an order is to renew the
       motion before this Court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) & advisory
       committee notes (1967).
             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
       hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.