Court Opinion

ID: 996569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:52:49.357465+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:21.434127
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-7240

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANDREW R. SPENCE,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-88-437-JFM, CA-97-458-JFM)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998            Decided:   October 13, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Lynne
Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Andrew R. Spence seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Spence, Nos. CR-88-437-JFM;

CA-97-458-JFM   (D.   Md.   June   27,   1997).   We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                     2