Court Opinion

ID: 4228447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-12-13 20:21:21.208248+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:39.471983
License: Public Domain

People v Howard (2017 NY Slip Op 08688)

People v Howard

2017 NY Slip Op 08688

Decided on December 13, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 13, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-06637
 (Ind. No. 10531/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vCurtis Howard, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed May 13, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Kupershmidt, 152 AD3d 797; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133) and, therefore, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court