Court Opinion

ID: 698856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:39:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:22.328803
License: Public Domain

59 F.3d 167NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE of Maryland;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-6259.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.Decided June 26, 1995.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se.  Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Nasim v. State of Maryland, No. CA-93-4142-B (D. Md. Feb. 2, 1995).*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
 In view of our disposition of this case, we deny Nasim's request to hold this case in abeyance pending a decision on rehearing in Nasim v. State of Maryland, 42 F.3d 1472 (4th Cir.1995)