Court Opinion

ID: 9661543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:42:20.297316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:30.002525
License: Public Domain

McCORMICK, Judge,
dissenting.
In addition to joining in the dissenting opinion of Presiding Judge Onion, I write to again point out what I noted in my dissenting opinion in Ex parte Huerta (No. 69,352, January 30, 1985):
“... To conclude from this ‘record’ that applicant was misled is to elevate pleading to the status of evidence.”
As in Huerta, this cause should be remanded for a hearing where applicant may properly assume the burden which previously had been placed on persons such as this applicant.
WHITE, J., joins in this dissent.