Court Opinion

ID: 9487494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 12:17:44.37295+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:52:17.901654
License: Public Domain

DUBINA, Circuit Judge,
concurring specially:
I agree with Judge Hatchett that Scott did not adequately present the claim that his HAC instruction was constitutionally defective. I also agree that the district court did not err in denying Scott’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion. For these reasons, I concur in all of Judge Hatchett’s opinion. Even if, however, we determined that Scott adequately presented his HAC instruction claim, he would be entitled to no relief, as explained by Judge Anderson in Part IV.B of his opinion concurring specially. Accordingly, I concur in that part of Judge Anderson’s opinion as well.