Court Opinion

ID: 996306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:49:06.539887+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:18.984501
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PHILLIP HENRIQUES,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-89-P, CA-97-198-3-P)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Eugean Murphy, MURPHY & CHAPMAN, P.A., Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellant.   Douglas Scott Broyles, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Henriques, Nos. CR-93-89-P; CA-97-198-3-P

(W.D.N.C. May 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2