Court Opinion

ID: 9834384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:33:01.216512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:14.427447
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In the motion for rehearing, relators insist, among other things, that we erred, in denying the application under consideration in advance of a review and determination of the appeal from the order of the Ninety-Sixth district court, which had granted a temporary writ of injunction, as was in that proceeding sought.
 It is to be noted, however, that th& appeal referred to had not been fully perfected by filing in this court the transcript and statement of facts, and hence the order in that proceeding was not before us for determination. Moreover, the district court permitted the filing -of a supersedeas bond which had the effect of suspending its order. Houtchens v. Mercer (Tex. Com. App.) 29 SW.(2d) 1031, 69 A. L. R. 1103, and the application herein involved is an original one, in no wise affected by the action of the district court.
Other questions we think are sufficiently disposed of in our original opinion, and the motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.