Court Opinion

ID: 8480456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:32:48.457493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.948504
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03114-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.