Court Opinion

ID: 4328445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-07 14:32:15.593242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:03.158765
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                  No. 06-18-00190-CR

     KEARAYAN QUINTON WILLIAMS, Appellant

                           V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

        On Appeal from the 124th District Court
                Gregg County, Texas
              Trial Court No. 47259-B

      Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
        Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION
           Kearayan Quinton Williams has filed an untimely notice of appeal from a conviction of

possession of a controlled substance. 1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

           The judgment of conviction in this matter indicates that Williams’ sentence was imposed

on July 18, 2018, and that his notice of appeal was filed on October 23, 2018. There is nothing in

the appellate record to indicate that Williams filed a motion for new trial. In the absence of a

timely motion for new trial, Williams, to perfect his appeal, was required to file his notice of appeal

within thirty days of the date sentence was imposed, or on or before August 17, 2018. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The notice of appeal, therefore, was untimely.

           We notified Williams by letter that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that

the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. We gave Williams ten days to respond

to our letter and to demonstrate how we have jurisdiction over the appeal notwithstanding the noted

defect. Counsel for Williams responded, stating that he was unaware of his appointment as

Williams’ counsel until October 23, 2018, when he received a telephone call from the official court

reporter for the 124th Judicial District Court, inquiring as to whether a reporter’s record from

Williams’ jury trial was needed for his appeal. Appointed counsel filed the notice of appeal as

soon as he received that telephone call on October 23, 2018.

           While we are not unsympathetic to this circumstance, we lack authority to create

jurisdiction where none exists. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that,

without a timely notice of appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo v.

1
    See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (West 2017).

                                                      2
State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209

n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

        Because Williams did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction.

                                             Ralph K. Burgess
                                             Justice

Date Submitted:       November 5, 2018
Date Decided:         November 6, 2018

Do Not Publish

                                                3