Court Opinion

ID: 9958041
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-06 10:16:33.563629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:43.464895
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00280-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

PATRICIA JOHNSTON,                                        §   APPEAL FROM THE
APPELLANT

V.                                                        §   COUNTY COURT

HON. JAMES A. TODD,
APPELLEE                                                  §   ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM
         Appellant, Patricia Johnston, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. The
motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs
are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered April 3, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                            APRIL 3, 2024

                                        NO. 12-23-00280-CV

                                     PATRICIA JOHNSTON,
                                           Appellant
                                              V.
                                     HON. JAMES A. TODD,
                                           Appellee

                                   Appeal from the County Court
                          of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14299)

                   THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellant
to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal
be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are
taxed against the party incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.