Court Opinion

ID: 684489
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:51:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:59.337357
License: Public Domain

42 F.3d 1386
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.John B. KOTMAIR, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-1963.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted November 17, 1994.Decided December 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.  (CA-94-721)
John B. Kotmair, Jr., appellant pro se.  Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment on his claims filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 (1988) and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552a (West 1977 & Supp.1994).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Kotmair v. Department of Justice, No. CA-94-721 (D. Md. July 12, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED