Court Opinion

ID: 9838732
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-07 18:01:10.327892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:33.083267
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12525   Document: 5-1      Date Filed: 09/07/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-12525
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      BENJAMIN D. LOLLIS,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      CITY OF ATLANTA,

                                                   Defendant-Appellee.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cv-04244-TCB
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12525      Document: 5-1     Date Filed: 09/07/2023      Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-12525

      Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Benjamin Lollis, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s
      April 7, 2022, final order and judgment. The statutory time limit
      required Lollis to file a notice of appeal on or before May 16, 2022,
      30 days after the district court denied his motion to reconsider. See
      28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).
      However, Lollis did not file his notice of appeal until August 1,
      2023.
             Additionally, there is no basis for relief under Federal Rules
      of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Lollis did not
      move for relief under either Rule until more than a year after the
      entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). Accordingly,
      the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate
      jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300
      (11th Cir. 2010).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.