Court Opinion

ID: 5171508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 04:56:19.177086+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:06.664473
License: Public Domain

MCCARTHY, J.
This is an action in claim and delivery for the recovery of certain personal property and to restrain the defendant, sheriff of Camas county, from selling it on execution. Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment.
The only proof of service of the notice of appeal is the return of the sheriff through his deputy. It is *the duty of the sheriff to serve all notices, as well as process, when requested. (C..S., sec. 3596, subd. 8.) His return is prima facie evidence. (C. S., see. 3598.) The coroner must perform the duties of sheriff when the sheriff is an interested party or otherwise incapacitated from servieé. (C. S., sec. 3680.) In this case the sheriff was disqualified from performing the duties of that office because a party. It follows that Ms deputy was disqualified to perform such duties. The return of the sheriff is not effective when he is disqualified to perform the official act to which he certifies. Therefore, the return is no proof of service. It is not necessary to decide whether service by him or his deputy as an individual, supported by affidavit as in the case of service by any other individual, would be valid, as there is no such affidavit in the record. The unsworn. statement of a private individual is no proof of service. There being no proof of service of the notice of appeal, the record does not show jurisdiction in this court, and the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered. Costs awarded to . respondents.
Rice, C. J., and Budge, Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.