Court Opinion

ID: 995391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:36:51.709664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:39.424459
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-7555

ANNETTA J. PUGH,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JANET BULLOCK,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-97-202-5-F-3)

Submitted:   June 18, 1998                  Decided:   July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lyle Joseph Yurko, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. David
Fred Hoke, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

      Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of   the   district   court.   Pugh   v.   Bullock,   No.   CA-97-202-5-F-3

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                      2