Court Opinion

ID: 8608276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 05:33:41.253096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.387426
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The agency did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s motion to reconsider as numerically and time barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(3). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*609ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.