Court Opinion

ID: 7340723
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 23:51:11.398731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:15.713907
License: Public Domain

BIJUR, J.
Defendant, in February, 1903, being in arrears for rent of plaintiff’s piano, purchased it for $100, payable at the rate of $6 per month. She made occasional payments on account of this purchase, aggregating $23, up to December, 1903. All the circumstances surrounding the sale indicate that it was intended to be merely conditional. Costello v. Herbst, 16 Misc. Rep. 687, 38 N. Y. Supp. 1123, affirmed 18 Misc. Rep. 176, 41 N. Y. Supp. 574, and Smith v. Lynes, 5 N. Y. 41.
Section 139 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580) does not forbid the entertainment of an action in replevin on this contract, because the inhibition is confined to written contracts of conditional sale, and the contract in the case at bar was oral, although a memorandum thereof was signed by the plaintiff.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.