Court Opinion

ID: 1000106
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:35:20.068237+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:15.787169
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6651

WARREN FLETCHER-EL,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; FRANK C. SIZER,
JR., Warden,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-98-4088-WMN)

Submitted:   October 21, 1999             Decided:   October 27, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Fletcher-El, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.    We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Fletcher-El v. Lanham, No. CA-98-4088-WMN (D.

Md. Apr. 30, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2