Court Opinion

ID: 4208585
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-03 15:16:07.952491+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:39.580199
License: Public Domain

People v Dorsey (2017 NY Slip Op 06896)

People v Dorsey

2017 NY Slip Op 06896

Decided on October 3, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

4561 5357/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vJaysen Dorsey, Defendant-Appellant.

Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kate Mollison of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered September 15, 2015,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 3, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.