Court Opinion

ID: 4116728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-18 21:15:32.81685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:24.356457
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                            ____________________
                               NO. 09-16-00347-CR
                            ____________________

                           LOUIS LANDRY, Appellant

                                          V.

                        THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________

                    On Appeal from the 356th District Court
                           Hardin County, Texas
                           Trial Cause No. 23354
________________________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On November 23, 2016, we notified the parties that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the

record or the appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. The

appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to

proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no

satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                           1
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                           ________________________________
                                                  STEVE McKEITHEN
                                                       Chief Justice

Submitted on January 17, 2017
Opinion Delivered January 18, 2017
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

                                       2