Court Opinion

ID: 9283546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-29 16:06:43.90791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:12:58.784333
License: Public Domain

To set aside a decree of divorce.
Denied Nov. 7, 1894, with costs.
Relator filed a bill for divorce. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, to which complainant answered. Defendant was granted a decree March 21, 1894. The cross-bill was verified, but the verification did not contain the averment negativing collusion. June 29, 1894, relator filed a petition asking that the decree be set aside, because (1) no replication to complainant's answer to the cross bill had been filed; (2) defendant's cross-bill was not properly verified; (3) the testimony was taken within four months after the filing of the cross-bill, and (4) the decree was entered within the same time.