Court Opinion

ID: 9498512
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 17:19:41.222809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:58:52.844037
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
On January 24, 2005, petitioner filed a motion to remand his previously denied petition for writ of habeas corpus. The motion sought substantially the same relief as requested in the motion presently before the court. We construed the pleading as a second or successive habeas petition and denied the motion on February 9, 2005, for failure to meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).
Now before the court is petitioner’s further motion for stay of execution, and motion for leave to file a successive habeas corpus petition again asserting substantially the same relief as previously requested. Because petitioner cannot satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), we deny the motions.