Court Opinion

ID: 5583312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:46:03.107728+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:09.134754
License: Public Domain

Gilbert, J.
Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge oí the superior court did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction. Judgment affirmed.

Sll the Justices concur.

Passmore cG Forehand, for plaintiff in error,
cited: Civil Code, § 3666; Guin v. Hilton &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 487, and cit.; Smith v. Smith, 105 Ga. 111; Woodward v. Gates, 38 Ga. 206; 40 Cyc. 508.
Perry & Williamson, contra,
cited: Civil Code, §§ 3666, 3497, 5493; Gray L. Co. v. Gaskin, 122 Ga. 342; Kollock v. Webb, 113 Ga. 762; Camp v. Dixon, 112 Ga. 872; Brown v. Martin, 137 Ga. 338, and cit.; Trammell v. Johnson, 54 Ga. 340, 344; Griswold v. Greer, 18 Ga. 545; 40 Cyc. 512.