Court Opinion

ID: 9392924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-08 18:04:47.99598+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:49.878873
License: Public Domain

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                            NO.      2023       KW    0267

VERSUS

JAMES       BERNARD       HOLTS

In    Re:          James       Bernard             Holts,     applying         for     supervisory               writs,

                   22nd    Judicial                District       Court,       Parish      of       St.        Tammany,
                  No.     459880.

             IT   DENIED       ON       THE    SHOWING       MADE.         Relator      failed            to    include
the    memorandum          in       support          of    the    application          for      postconviction
relief,          the    state'      s    response,          the    district          court'     s    ruling,          and

any     other          portions          of        the    district         court       record         that          might

support          the    claims          raised       in    the    application          for      postconviction
relief.            In    addition,             relator'      s    brief     in     support          of     the       writ

application             does    not          set    out     the   issue( s)       presented           for        review

or     assign           error           to     the        judgment        of     the     district                court.

Supplementation                of       this       writ     application          and/ or      an     application

for     rehearing          will          not       be     considered.            See    Uniform            Rules        of

Louisiana  Courts     Appeal,  Rules
                                 of  2- 18. 7 &   4- 9.   Any                                                    future
filing     this issue should include the entire contents
             on                                                                                                of    this
application,  the missing items noted above,    and   a copy                                                   of    this
ruling.

                                                            11

COURT       OF APPEAL,         FIRST         CIRCUIT

              qTY CLERK OF COUR;(
                                               U
                  FOR THE       COURT