Court Opinion

ID: 3196135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-20 19:06:43.384842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:10.675644
License: Public Domain

People v Azeez (2016 NY Slip Op 02975)

People v Azeez

2016 NY Slip Op 02975

Decided on April 20, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 20, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2014-07804

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,
vMohamed Azeez, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (A. Alexander Donn of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Ellen Abbot, and Tina Grillo of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Armstrong, J.), dated August 4, 2014, which designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the People's contention, this appeal from an order designating the defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C should not be dismissed on the ground that the defendant has been deported (see People v Shim, _____ AD3d _____, 2016 NY Slip Op 01818 [2d Dept 2016]; People v Edwards, 117 AD3d 418; People v Gudino-Sanchez, 116 AD3d 565; People v Scott, 113 AD3d 491).
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level two designation. A defendant seeking to establish a downward departure has the burden of identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, and establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, facts in support of the identified mitigating factor. The defendant failed to meet this burden with respect to any of the alleged mitigating factors upon which he relies (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861; People v Correnti, 126 AD3d 681).
DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court