Court Opinion

ID: 8431695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 07:38:23.117056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:37.862931
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Carson Darrell Rodgers appeals from a district court order adopting the magistrate judge’s order to deny Rodgers leave to exceed that court’s twenty-page limit on his brief in support of his § 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED