Court Opinion

ID: 4565867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-16 14:04:07.264599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:55.487400
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                             FOURTH DISTRICT

                         JERRY A. RIGGS, SR.,
                              Petitioner,

                                    v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, AS SUCCESSOR-
    IN-INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, AS
      SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL
 ASSOCIATION, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF
THE ACCREDITED MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-3 ASSET BACKED
                          NOTES,
                        Respondent.

                             No. 4D20-1681

                          [September 16, 2020]

   Petition for writ of mandamus/certiorari to the Circuit Court for the
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge;
L.T. Case No. CACE 14-020167.

   Samuel D. Lopez of Samuel D. Lopez, P.A., Southwest Ranches, for
petitioner.

   Allison Morat of Bitman O’Brien & Morat, PLLC, Lake Mary, for
respondent.

MAY, J.

   The borrower petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus or
alternatively, certiorari. He sought review of an order entered on his
motion for reconsideration entered without a hearing and to compel the
court to conduct a hearing.

   “In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus the petitioner must have
a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an
indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner
must have no other adequate remedy available.” Huffman v. State, 813
So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).
   Denial of a mandamus petition is the correct disposition when a
petitioner fails to show that the respondent has a ministerial duty to
perform the requested action. See, e.g., id.; see also Campbell v. State, No.
SC12-798, 2012 WL 2685023, at *1 (Fla. July 3, 2012) (“Because
petitioner has failed to show that the respondent has a ministerial duty to
order reinstatement of any motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.850, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.”).
Here, the petitioner has failed to show that the trial court had no
ministerial duty to hold a hearing on the motion for reconsideration.

   The request for mandamus relief lacks merit and is denied.

    As for the request for certiorari relief, the petition fails to demonstrate
that the order causes material injury that cannot be corrected on
postjudgment appeal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to grant certiorari
relief from the nonfinal order. Williams v. Oken, 62 So. 3d 1129, 1132–33
(Fla. 2011); Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA
1996).

    Petition for writ of mandamus denied.

WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

                             *        *         *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                      2