Court Opinion

ID: 7354400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 03:40:43.486203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:28.448371
License: Public Domain

POUND, J.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for plaintiffs in terms provides for “plaintiffs’ bill of taxable costs, amounting' to the sum of $205.41, which the court in its discretion hereby awards and grants to the plaintiffs against all of the defendants according to the rate allowed by law in an action brought to foreclose a real property.”
The clerk on taxation of costs disallowed an item in plaintiffs’ bill of costs for “allowance by statute $41.50,” being the percentages under section 3253 of the Code of Civil Procedure allowed to' plaintiff when he recovers costs in an action brought to foreclose a mortgage upon real property.
“As a matter of experience and investigation, I think it quite customary in cases of this sort, when costs are awarded to either party, to fix the amount at the same figures as would be awarded in a mortgage foreclosure action.” Hazard, Co. J., in Salerno v. Vogt, 78 Misc. Rep. 64, 66, 138 N. Y. Supp. 664, 665.
The court in its discretion having specifically made an allowance of costs to the plaintiffs “at the rate allowed by law in an action brought to foreclose a mortgage upon real property,” the only question for the clerk, as the taxing officer of the court, or for the court on this motion, to determine, is whether such percentages are allowed in a mortgage foreclosure action. Clearly they are so allowed.
As the only explanation that suggests itself for the disallowance of this item by the clerk is that the parties lost sight of the terms of the judgment and sought to raise the question of the items of costs properly taxable on the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien where “costs to be taxed” are allowed, the motion allowing the item is granted, without costs.