Court Opinion

ID: 1004052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:35:43.222279+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:30.662316
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6055

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT DANIEL HELMS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CR-99-4, CA-00-575-3)

Submitted:   March 23, 2001                 Decided:   April 12, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Daniel Helms, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, OF-
FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert Daniel Helms appeals the district court’s order dis-

missing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Helms, Nos. CR-99-4; CA-

00-575-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Dec. 6, 2000; entered Dec. 12, 2000).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2