Court Opinion

ID: 2963015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:04:58.856369+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:33.995792
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          January 10, 1995      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________          No. 94-1344                                 JONATHAN R. MCNITT,                                Plaintiff - Appellant,                                          v.                                   BIC CORPORATION,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                     [Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________                     Coffin and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges.
                                          _____________________                                _____________________               David J. KillKelley for appellant.
               ___________________               Chester A. Janiak,  with whom  C. Mark Furcolo  and Burns  &
               _________________              _______________      ________          Levinson were on brief for appellee.
          ________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________

                    TORRUELLA, Chief  Judge.  After a  complete and careful
                    TORRUELLA, Chief  Judge.
                               ____________          evaluation of the record  in light of the positions raised in the          parties'  briefs and  at  oral argument,  we affirm  the district          court's  decision  on  substantially   the  same  basis  as  that          elucidated in the district  court's opinion at 846 F.  Supp. 1049          (D.N.H. 1994).                    Affirmed.
                    ________