Court Opinion

ID: 2682569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-10 21:00:43.185094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:30.290633
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 JUL 10 2014

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10126

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01867-RCC-
                                                 HCE-1
  v.

EDUARDO MARTINEZ-GLORIA,                         MEMORANDUM*

               Defendant - Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Arizona
                  Raner C. Collins, Chief District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted April 22, 2014**

Before:        HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

       Eduardo Martinez-Gloria appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 50-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Gloria’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Martinez-Gloria the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Martinez-Gloria has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 50-month

sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the

appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,

986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      DISMISSED.