Court Opinion

ID: 8405677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-26 20:04:49.293013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:57.031595
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

 

 

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0822

VERSUS

MCKINLEY PHIPPS, JR. OCTOBER 26, 2022

In Re: McKinley Phipps, Jr., applying for supervisory writs,
22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany,
No. 316,809.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

STAY LIFTED. WRIT DENIED. The jury unanimity rule set
forth in Ramos v. Louisiana, U.S. _, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206
L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) does not apply retroactively in Louisiana.
State v. Reddick, 2021-01893 (La. 10/21/22), __ So.3d __.

GH
WRC

Guidry, J., concurs. As a judge of an intermediate
appellate court of this state, I am constrained to concur in the
denial of retroactive application of Ramos v. Louisiana, U.S.

__, 140 8.ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020), in accordance with
the recent majority decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in
State v. Reddick, 2021-01893 (La. 10/21/22), —  So.3d __
However, I write separately to express my disagreement with
upholding unconstitutional non-unanimous convictions on
collateral review and to express my disappointment in this
state’s failure to correct the lingering legacy of
discrimination and injustice embodied in such convictions for
the more detailed reasons expressed by Justice Griffin in her
dissenting opinion to the Reddick decision.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

a sal)

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT