Court Opinion

ID: 9426263
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:17:20.583096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:59.875696
License: Public Domain

-C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in previous opinions by himself1 and by *961Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (dis*961senting); Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 426-433 (1966) (concurring in judgment).

Mishkin v.New York, 383 U. S. 502, 515-518 (1966) (dissenting).