Court Opinion

ID: 8261719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 15:55:04.85615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:12.246143
License: Public Domain

Bond, J.
This action is upon an indemnity bond to recover the value of certain property claimed by relator in an attachment brought by the defendants against third parties. After issue joined defendants took the deposition of plaintiff and two other witnesses, a special commissioner having been appointed for that purpose. On the trial the deposition of plaintiff alone was introduced in evidence. It is conceded that all the deponents were residents of the city of St. Louis, in good health, and not expecting to leave the city, and amenable to the process of the courts. At *640the conclusion of the evidence plaintiff took a voluntary nonsuit. The clerk taxed against her the costs of the three depositions, embracing the fees of the special-commissioner and the stenographer, amounting to $74.40, which she paid under protest, and moved the court to retax this cost, which motion was sustained and the cost ordered taxed against defendants, and the amount refunded to plaintiff which had been paid by her to the sheriff. Defendants have appealed.
' TcSte-°d"PMicommissioner^ stenographer's The depositions taken in this case were not used as evidence on the trial, beyond the reading of the deposition of plaintiff as an admission on her part. R. S. 1889, sec. 4461; Bogie v. Nolan, 96 Mo. 85. Still, they were legally taken by a special commissioner appointed at the instance of plaintiff, under the power given to suitors by the terms of the statute. R. S. 1889, secs. 4434-4440. The depositions thus-taken and filed in the cause became the common property of the adversary litigants, and might have been used by either party, if the statutory conditions, entitling them to be read, arose. Watson v. Race, 46 Mo. App. loc. cit. 552; R. S. 1889, sec. 4461. There is no evidence that the depositions were immaterial to the issues or that they were taken to oppress the plaintiff by increasing the costs. We have recently ruled that the costs of taking depositions filed in the cause by a special commissioner, were taxable under sections 2920 and 2946. Watkins v. McDonald, 70 Mo. App. 357. The amount to be allowed such commissioner to be a reasonable one, under the facts and circumstances attending the performance of his duties, but not less than the sum fixed by statute as the fees of justices of the peace and notaries for taking depositions, and no.t greater than the statutory compensation of referees. To this extent the trial court should have taxed the *641costs of taking the depositions in question against the losing party, but no taxation of stenographer’s fees should have been made against such party, since the record wholly fails to show that a stenographer was employed by consent of parties or that any stipulation as to his fees was made, and the statute does not otherwise warrant any allowance for costs of a stenographer. The judgment herein will be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to tax the costs in conformity with this opinion.
Judge Bland concurs; Judge Biggs dissents.