Court Opinion

ID: 3704957
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:42:05.25286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:10.163385
License: Public Domain

{¶ 4} For the reasons stated in my separate opinion when this case was initially before us, I do not believe the trial court abused its discretion in finding that there was insufficient corroborating evidence supporting Delmar Carlisle's alleged confession. See State v.Swann, 171 Ohio App.3d 304, 2007-Ohio-2010, 870 N.E.2d 754, at ¶ 44-49 (Sadler, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). According, I respectfully dissent. *Page 1