Court Opinion

ID: 9570970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:27:55.944956+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:16.745195
License: Public Domain

*625Clinton, J.,
concurring.
I concur in the opinion of McCown, J. However, I believe a further comment with reference to the language of section 28-834, R. S. Supp., 1972, which constituted the fourth paragraph of instruction No. 10, is required. Such language is totally inappropriate for incorporation in a jury instruction. That language is so abstruse that, if it means anything at all, the meaning is not susceptible of ready understanding. It is at best an abstract statement of policy that could not be helpful to a jury in any determination it must make. I cannot imagine any circumstances under which it should be incorporated in a jury instruction.