Court Opinion

ID: 6334388
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-22 21:01:27.415591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:37.017963
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 19-1045V
                                        (not to be published)

    CHARLES SILVESTRI,
                                                                Chief Special Master Corcoran
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: March 18, 2022

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Attorney’s Fees and Costs; Hourly
                                                                Rates
                         Respondent.

Michael William Pottetti, Port Jefferson, New York, for Petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

       On July 18, 2019, Charles Silvestri filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury as a result of a
tetanus diphtheria acellular-pertussis vaccine he received on January 9, 2019. (Petition
at ¶¶ 4). On December 21, 2021, a decision was issued awarding compensation to
Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 40).

1
   Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
        Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated December
22, 2021 (ECF No. 41), requesting a total award of $14,443.30 (representing $13,163.30
in fees and $1,280.00 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for
Petitioner represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 41-1
at 2). Respondent reacted to the motion on December 22, 2021, indicating that he is
satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met
in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded at the Court’s discretion.
(ECF No. 37) 3. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

       I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s requests and find a
reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate, for the reason listed below.

                                              ANALYSIS

        The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section
15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific
billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the
service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec’y of Health
& Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee
requests hours that are “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” Saxton v.
Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v.
Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is “well within the special master’s discretion to
reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for
the work done.” Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request
sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner
notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 86
Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of
petitioner’s fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human
Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011).

       The petitioner “bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates
charged, and the expenses incurred.” Wasson v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl.
Ct. 482, 484 (1991). The Petitioner “should present adequate proof [of the attorney’s fees
and costs sought] at the time of the submission.” Wasson, 24 Cl. Ct. at 484 n.1.
Petitioner’s counsel “should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours
that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private

3
    On December 22, 2021, counsel for Respondent filed his response as a “Reply to Response to Motion”
                                                    2
practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission.” Hensley,
461 U.S. at 434.
                                     ATTORNEY FEES

       Petitioner requests compensation for attorney Michael Pottetti at the rate of $260
per hour for all time billed between 2019 – 2021. (ECF No. 41-1 at 1). This rate is not
appropriate for all relevant years’ work was performed on this matter, however. Mr.
Pottetti has previously been awarded the rate of $225 per hour for attorney work, and
$150 per hour for paralegal work time billed between 2019 – 2020. See Blaise v. Sec’y of
Health & Human Servs., No. 19-670V, 2021 WL 851086 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 26,
2020). I agree with the reasoning of the previous special master for adopting this rate,
and therefore similarly reduce Mr. Pottetti’s rates to $225 for attorney tasks and $150 for
paralegal tasks billed between 2019 - 2020. This results in a reduction of $1,125.00. 4 For
time billed in 2021, however, the requested increased attorney rate of $260 per hour and
paralegal rate of $160 per hour are appropriate and will be awarded.

                                       ATTORNEY COSTS

       Petitioner requests $1,280.00 in overall costs. (ECF No. 41-1 at 5). This amount is
comprised of the Court’s filing fee, and medical records. I have reviewed the requested
costs and find it to be reasonable and shall award it in full.

                                          CONCLUSION

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT IN PART Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and
costs. I award a total of $13,318.30 (representing $12,038.30 in fees and $1,280.00 in
costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s
counsel. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules
of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                       s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                       Brian H. Corcoran
                                                       Chief Special Master
4
 This amount consists of ($420 - $400 = $20 x 7.2 hrs = $144) + ($484 - $470 = $14 x 8.8 hrs = $123.20)
+ $267.20.
5
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice
renouncing their right to seek review.
                                                   3