Court Opinion

ID: 3251215
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:22:04.994731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:54.679731
License: Public Domain

[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Tom Moran was convicted of crime and he appeals. Affirmed.
(1) The transcript in this appeal contains no bill of exceptions, and, following the repeated holdings of this court, we cannot, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, review the written requests to charge refused to appellant. — Mitchell'sCase, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 So. 982; Clay's Case, 14 Ala. App. 664,71 So. 982; Clark's Case, 14 Ala. App. 633,72 So. 291; Dorough's Case, 14 Ala. App. 110, 72 So. 208. *Page 380 
(2) The motion for arrest of judgment is rightly set out in the record proper; but nothing appears from the record to show what, if any, action was taken by the court with reference to said motion; nor does it appear from said record when the motion was filed or made.
(3) It is not the office of a bill of exceptions to present for review the ruling of the trial court on a motion in arrest of judgment. This motion reaches only errors appearing on the face of the record. The record should show, however, some order or judgment upon the motion. — Taylor's Case, 112 Ala. 69,20 So. 848; Hampton's Case, 133 Ala. 180, 32 So. 230.
(4) A recent statute (Acts 1915, p. 598) gives an appellant automatically an exception to the adverse ruling of the court upon a written motion, assuming the motion to have been in writing, but the statute also requires the ruling of the court to be made a part of the record. Error is not presumed; it should be affirmatively shown. No ruling or order of court appears, and non constat the motion may have been filed after sentence. — Sanders' Case, 129 Ala. 69, 29 So. 841.
An inspection of the record reveals no reversible error, and the judgment below must be affirmed.
Affirmed.