Court Opinion

ID: 8210352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-29 18:00:30.359781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:49.673867
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10392     Document: 00516488873         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/29/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                  No. 22-10392                         September 29, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Rodriguez-Zarraga,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:20-CR-4-12

   Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jose Rodriguez-Zarraga has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Zarraga has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10392    Document: 00516488873          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/29/2022

                                  No. 22-10392

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2