Court Opinion

ID: 9553761
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:34:47.248261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:32:13.711160
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
(dissenting in part).
I concur in the result but not with all that is said in the foregoing opinion; I do not agree that the proceedings complained of were void from their inception or that the findings of fact and conclusions of law should be ordered expunged from the records.
I. think a district judge is within his rights in expressing the reasons for his actions and that is the effect of his findings. Furthermore if and when a further application be made pursuant to' the order of the trial judge declaring that his ruling *372is without prejudice, then the findings complained of become functus officio in later proceedings.