Court Opinion

ID: 2684245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-17 16:00:41.723852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:24:58.016206
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

  HAREN S. GANDHI, JOHN VITO CAVATAIO,
ROBERT HENRY HAMMERLE, AND YISUN CHENG,
               Appellants,

                           v.

   BRIGITTE BANDL-KONRAD, ANDREAS
HERTZBERG, BERND KRUTZSCH, ARNO NOLTE,
   MARKUS PAULE, STEFAN RENFFTLEN,
 NORBERT WALDBUESSER, MICHEL WEIBEL,
 GUENTER WENNINGER, AND ROLF WUNSCH,
                 Appellees.
           ______________________

                      2014-1087
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,839.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    E. ANTHONY FIGG, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck,
P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him
on the brief was R. DANNY HUNTINGTON.

    MICHAEL H. JACOBS, Crowell & Mornig LLP, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellees.
                   ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, SCHALL and HUGHES,
                  Circuit Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                        ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

   July 17, 2014                   /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
       Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                   Clerk of Court