Court Opinion

ID: 6417977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 11:57:35.843101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:51:38.952970
License: Public Domain

Endicott, J.
The facts of the case appear in the papers and the auditor’s report. The auditor finds that the lease was executed by the defendant, then a married woman, with her husband, Zabdiel S. Sampson, as the subscribing witness. No objection was taken before him or in the court below to the form of the answer, and the case was argued before us on the merits.
The point taken by the defendant, that the attestation of the lease by the husband is a sufficient assent within the statute, is decisive of the case. It must be presumed that a husband, so signing his name as witness to the execution of the lease by his wife and the plaintiff, must have known the character of the instrument ; and his attestation thereto is a sufficient assent in writing. Gen. Sts. c. 108, § 3. It was an assent contemporaneous with the execution of the instrument, and delivered as an operative part of it. Melley v. Casey, 99 Mass. 241.
In Hills v. Bearse, 9 Allen, 403, the husband signed the deed with the wife, and there were no words, bearing on the question of his assent, except the words “ In witness whereof,” in the testimonium clause. These the court held to mean in substance that he had signed and sealed it in witness that his wife had executed it, thereby giving his assent.
In a recent case, a wife made a mortgage of her real estate, and the husband did not join in or sign the mortgage deed; but did sign as guarantor the mortgage note, upon which was a memorandum that it was secured by mortgage on her land; and it was held that he thereby gave his assent in writing to the mortgage. Cormerais v. Wesselhoeft, 114 Mass.
As the lease was therefore valid, the entry must be

Verdict set aside.

*

 By the St. of 1874, c. 184, § 1, a married woman may lease her real property in the same manner as if she were sole.