Court Opinion

ID: 9571509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:32:18.874785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:31.454024
License: Public Domain

Dethmers, J.
(dissenting). The circuit court’s order in this case holding claimants disqualified from receiving the unemployment compensation benefits sought by them, was affirmed on this case’s previous visit to this Court. Reasons for affirmance appear in the opinion of this writer as reported in 376 Mich 135.
Since then, nothing has happened to change the result except this Court’s amendment, on October 4, 1965, of GrCR 405.3(2) relating to disqualification, of a judge for ownership of stock in a corporation party to a case, “thereby”, as noted in a footnote in Mr. Justice Souris’ opinion, “removing the bar which prevented two of the three nonparticipating Justices from participating in the first decision herein” and the immediate granting thereafter, on that same date, of this rehearing by action of what had thus become a majority vote of this Court. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this writer’s said opinion, affirmance again should be ordered on this rehearing.
Kelly and O’Hara, JJ., concurred with' Dethmers, J.
Adams, J., did not sit.