Court Opinion

ID: 604979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:24:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:28.136313
License: Public Domain

991 F.2d 787
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lonnie M. SAUNDERS;  Edward C. Morris;  Edward W. Murray;Larry D. Huffman, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-7225.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  April 26, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-92-391)
Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.
William Rundahl Coleman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bernard v. Saunders, No. CA-92-391 (E.D. Va.  Nov. 9, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We have considered Bernard's supplemental pleadings