Court Opinion

ID: 4578688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-10-20 18:00:18.33737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:16.106733
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10274     Document: 00515607806         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/20/2020

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                 October 20, 2020
                                  No. 20-10274
                                                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                      Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Javier Guizar-Hernandez, also known as Jorge Hernandez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:17-CR-468-6

   Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Javier Guizar-Hernandez has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Guizar-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10274    Document: 00515607806          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/20/2020

                                  No. 20-10274

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.

                                       2