Court Opinion

ID: 8279471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 03:38:26.08151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:40.086295
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, employed as a butcher, sued to recover $13 for one week’s wages. The services were not denied. Defendant claimed that he had discharged plaintiff because he had been told by his cashier that plaintiff had been taking tips from customers and giving away his employer’s goods and that plaintiff had admitted these things. This the plaintiff denied. The trial judge found for defendant.
If the defendant had proved that plaintiff had disposed of goods’ ■equal in amount to the latter’s salary, defendant might have been allowed to offset the value of those goods. This, however, the defendant did not do; the only evidence offered on this head being in regard to one small purchase, amounting to 33 cents, which plaintiff swears was paid for.
The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.