Court Opinion

ID: 5761713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:15:40.572244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:34.271118
License: Public Domain

Final order appealed from entered on February 17, 1966, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the petitions dismissed and the assessments reinstated, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. These were consolidated proceedings to reduce the real estate tax assessments for the years 1960-61 through 1965-66, on premises 205 East 63rd Street, Borough of Manhattan. The reductions allowed have no adequate support in the record. Petitioners have not shown by substantial evidence that the claimed over-valuation exist (Matter of Peterson v. Assessors of Town of Westport, 25 A D 2d 797). The building was completed during the early taxable years and was opened for occupancy in the taxable year 1962-63. Its cost of construction is a significant factor (Matter of Stewart Tenants Corp. v. Tax Comm. of City of N. Y., 25 A D 2d 623; Matter of 860 Fifth Ave. Corp. v. Tax Comm., 8 N Y 2d 29). Both the ground rents paid and the return of the property when the building was completed when capitalized at rates indisputably proper, show values in excess of the assessments. Additionally, the fire insurance coverage and mortgage loan all tend to support the property assessments. Sales in the area and the actual ground lease rental all show that the land assessments were within permissible range. Petitioners have not shown that the value is less than that fixed by the assessors (cf. Matter of *833Seagram & Sons v. Tax Comm., 18 A D 2d 109, affd. 14 N Y 2d 314). Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ. [See 27 A D 2d 807.]