Court Opinion

ID: 9919529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-18 18:01:35.86084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:28.936170
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-10259    Document: 30-1     Date Filed: 01/18/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-10259
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       MICHAEL LUMPKIN,
       a.k.a. Jamari,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00216-KKM-JSS-1
USCA11 Case: 23-10259      Document: 30-1     Date Filed: 01/18/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-10259

                            ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Michael Lumpkin in
       this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on ap-
       peal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386
       U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record re-
       veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
       correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re-
       veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
       GRANTED, and Lumpkin’s convictions and sentences are
       AFFIRMED.