Court Opinion

ID: 9910879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-18 19:01:03.905072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:48.378075
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       DEC 18 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA M. ALEXANDER; LIVE                        No. 22-36019
VICTORIOUSLY MINISTRIES,
                                                D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05110-TOR
                Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v.                                             MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF RICHLAND, A Municipal
Corporation,

                Defendant-Appellee.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Eastern District of Washington
                    Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted December 12, 2023**

Before:      WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

      Linda M. Alexander appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. United States, 330 F.3d 1186, 1187

(9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

      The district court properly dismissed Alexander’s action because Alexander

failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

      All pending requests are denied.

      AFFIRMED.

                                            2                                      22-36019