Court Opinion

ID: 8474750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:09:49.385295+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:24.244722
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Lyndon Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Armstrong, No. 7:03-cr-00107-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.