Court Opinion

ID: 7806672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-06 18:09:11.659079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:15.974752
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Perkins v. Perkins, 2022-Ohio-3116.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                           ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 GEAUGA COUNTY

JAMES R. PERKINS,                                CASE NO. 2022-G-0029

                 Plaintiff-Appellant,
                                                 Civil Appeal from the
        - vs -                                   Court of Common Pleas

STACY L. PERKINS,
                                                 Trial Court No. 2021 DC 000157
                 Defendant-Appellee.

                                        MEMORANDUM
                                          OPINION

                                    Decided: September 6, 2022
                                    Judgment: Appeal dismissed

J. Michael Drain, Jr., 147 Bell Street, Suite 202, Chagrin Falls, OH 44022 (For Plaintiff-
Appellant).

Gregory S. Costabile, 1400 Fifth Third Center, 600 Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland,
OH 44114 (For Defendant-Appellee).

MATT LYNCH, J.

        {¶1}     Appellant, James R. Perkins, through counsel, appeals a July 18, 2022

order, in which a magistrate from the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas granted

the motion in limine filed by appellee, Stacy L. Perkins.

        {¶2}     Initially, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order since

this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or orders. Noble v.

Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92, 94 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio

Constitution, a judgment of a trial court can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court
only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-

L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court

does not have jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen.

Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

       {¶3}   R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of

appealable judgment, and if the judgment of the trial court satisfies any of them, it will be

deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. Here, the July

18, 2022 order on appeal does not fit within any of the categories for being a final order

pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all the claims.

       {¶4}   Generally, a trial court’s decision to grant a motion in limine is an

interlocutory order that is not final and appealable. Gable v. Gates Mills, 103 Ohio St.3d

449, 2004-Ohio-5719, ¶ 34. Furthermore, “* * * a magistrate may enter orders without

judicial approval if necessary to regulate the proceedings and if not dispositive of a claim

or defense of a party.” See Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i). This court has held that “[a]lthough

magistrate’s orders are effective without judicial approval, they are not directly

appealable.” Arnold v. Arnold, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2021-G-0026, 2021-Ohio-4186, ¶

6. Hence, a magistrate’s order is simply interlocutory by nature. Id.

       {¶5}   In this matter, the July 18, 2022 magistrate’s order is not a final appealable

order, and this court does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal.           The order is

interlocutory. Nothing is preventing appellant from obtaining effective relief through an

appeal once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the action.

                                              2

Case No. 2022-G-0029
       {¶6}     Based upon the foregoing analysis, the order of the trial court is not a final

appealable order. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of

jurisdiction.

       {¶7}     Appeal dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.

                                               3

Case No. 2022-G-0029