Court Opinion

ID: 989666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:10:15.249633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:41.973679
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-6185

PAUL KEITH CREECH,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

M. B. WOODALL; WILL R. CROCKER; SHELIA W.
ADAMS; BETSY Y. JUSTUS,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
(CA-96-4-5-CT-BR)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                  Decided:   June 27, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Keith Creech, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap-

peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Creech v. Woodall, No. CA-96-4-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan 23, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2