Court Opinion

ID: 1003621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:29:06.385896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:27.140970
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7352

LARRY WAYNE BOGGS,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; DANNY HUGHES,
Superintendent, Alamance Correctional Center,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-379-1)

Submitted:   February 8, 2001          Decided:     February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Wayne Boggs, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Larry Wayne Boggs appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   Boggs v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-99-

379-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2000); Vick v. Williams, 233 F.3d 213 (4th

Cir. 2000).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2