Court Opinion

ID: 9386028
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-11 09:08:00.014996+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:45.038916
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 6, 2023

                                     NO. 03-21-00402-CR

                                Charles L. Sumrall, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

      APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
          BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND THEOFANIS
MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that Sumrall’s pleas to the

enhancement paragraphs were “TRUE” and that the statute for the offense was section

481.115(b) of the Texas Health and Safety Code. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.