Court Opinion

ID: 9687992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 16:56:21.923272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:33.957485
License: Public Domain

Clinton, J.,
concurring.
I concur in the result and in the opinion of the court, but I would deal with the issues raised by the “receipt” as follows. The recital in the “receipt” re “the only oral promise” was at most merely an admission against interest. In any event it is ambiguous on its face as to whether it pertains to the transaction which is the basis of the suit. Dunn v. Alexander, 104 Neb. 628, 178 N. W. 215, governs. The receipt raised only a jury question and the jury found for Arthur.