Court Opinion

ID: 2915481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 19:32:06.825244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:33.467639
License: Public Domain

lee, elmer edward v. state                                          

NO. 12-02-00158-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DAVID CARTER MCCOY,§
		APPEAL FROM THE 
APPELLANT

V.§
		COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE§
		SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)
	This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant was convicted of the
offense of failure to appear and fined $150.00.  Thereafter, Appellant timely filed a motion for new
trial.  Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 (2) provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of
appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless
a motion for new trial is timely filed.  Where a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of
appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. 
Id.  Since Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due to have been
filed on or before May 23, 2002.  Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until June 4, 2002. 
	Rule 26.3 provides that an appellate court may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if,
within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files a notice of appeal
and a motion to extend the time for filing the notice.  Although Appellant filed his notice of appeal
within the fifteen-day time period provided in the rule, he did not file his motion to extend time until
June 10, 2002, which was more than fifteen days after his notice of appeal was due to have been
filed.  
	When a notice of appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day
period, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by
dismissing it for want of jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
Therefore, Appellant's motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal is overruled, and this
appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  

Opinion delivered June 18, 2002.
Panel consisted of Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
1.       See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.
2.       All further rule references will be to the current edition of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless
otherwise specified.