Court Opinion

ID: 6105387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-20 22:00:39.480898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:18.275034
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10759      Document: 00516173549         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/20/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                  United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                  No. 21-10759                             January 20, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Noel Mandujano,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:20-CR-15-2

   Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Noel Mandujano has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Mandujano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10759    Document: 00516173549         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/20/2022

                                 No. 21-10759

   the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2