Court Opinion

ID: 4255248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-15 20:30:18.556192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:17:18.280194
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                              _________________
                               NO. 09-18-00093-CV
                              _________________

                          IN RE THOMAS RETZLAFF

________________________________________________________________________

                              Original Proceeding
                172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. B-199,953-A
________________________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Thomas Retzlaff, a vexatious litigant, filed a petition for issuance of a writ of

mandamus and a motion for temporary relief from the local administrative judge’s

denial of leave to file an intervention. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §

11.102(f) (West 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). The relator has not shown

that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the mandamus petition and

motion for temporary relief are denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). The motion to

dismiss filed by the real parties in interest, Klein Investigations and Consulting, a

Division of Klein Investments, Inc., and Klein Investments, Inc., is denied. Relator’s

                                           1
 
 
 

motion to strike Klein’s response and Amended Motion for Emergency Stay are also

denied.

      PETITION DENIED.

                                                       PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 12, 2018
Opinion Delivered March 13, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.

                                          2