Court Opinion

ID: 2865095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:50:07.252385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:37.563467
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00236-CR

Myja Kielyn Fletcher, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 50,498, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Myja Kielyn Fletcher pleaded guilty to theft of a firearm.  See Tex. Pen.
Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(C) (West Supp. 2002).  The district court deferred adjudication and
placed appellant on community supervision.  The court later revoked supervision, adjudicated
appellant guilty, and imposed sentence of ten months in state jail.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  Counsel's
motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed:   August 8, 2002
Do Not Publish