Court Opinion

ID: 8671131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 22:39:01.244297+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:20.184560
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
William M. Jackson Bailey appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bailey, No. 5:98-cr-30001-JPJ-2, 2008 WL 723753 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 13, 2008 & entered Mar. 14, 2008; Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.