Court Opinion

ID: 1015489
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:33:51.401277+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:16.320090
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Paul Emmanuel Pelham appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pelham v. Cain,
  
  No. CA-03-134-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED