Court Opinion

ID: 2926609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:33:22.643294+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:35.647712
License: Public Domain

NUMBERS 13-09-00412-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                   CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

UVALDO CANTU, JR. AND RUBEN M. TORRES, JR.,                             Appellants,

                                         v.

FROST NATIONAL BANK,                                Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 404th District Court
                   of Cameron County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben Torres, Jr., perfected an appeal from a

judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number

2007-07-3680-G (Ed Carey Development, L.P., et. al. v. Frost National Bank appellate

cause number 13-09-00081-CV).      This cause is presently before the Court on an
unopposed motion to partially dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and

Ruben M. Torres, Jr. Appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr., request that

this Court dismiss their appeal because they have settled their portion of the case and no

longer wish to pursue the appeal.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 6th day of August, 2009.

                                             2