Court Opinion

ID: 8476461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:01:38.047895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:26.208825
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clinton Mitchell, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 7:97-cr-00057-BR-1, 2009 WL 3348284 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 14, 2009 & entered Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense *397with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.