Court Opinion

ID: 8480182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:14:22.00903+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.686907
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joe Rangel, a federal prisoner, appeals the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Rangel v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00782-MHL, 2010 WL 114925 (E.D.Va., Jan. 12, 2010). We deny Rangel’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).