Court Opinion

ID: 6093813
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 20:11:52.238152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:38.967385
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered December 14, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 20-21 [1995]; People v Santos, 86 NY2d 869, 870 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence. Florio, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.