Court Opinion

ID: 3156167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-11-19 19:02:25.720499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:57:28.474536
License: Public Domain

Filed 11/19/15 P. v. Fischer CA6
                      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                      SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,                                                          H041884
                                                                    (Santa Cruz County
         Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   Super. Ct. No. F24689)

             v.

ERIN HOWARD FISCHER,

         Defendant and Appellant.

         Erin Howard Fischer appeals from an order declaring him incompetent and
transferring him to Atascadero State Hospital (Atascadero) until his mental competency
is restored. (Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (a)(1).) In May 2013, after appellant was stopped
by a police officer and found to have weapons in his vehicle and home, the Santa Cruz
County District Attorney charged him with one count of carrying a loaded firearm in a
vehicle by a felon, (Pen. Code, § 25850, subd. (c)(1)), and one count of possession of a
firearm by an ex-felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1)).
         While the case was pending, in July 2013, appellant was deemed incompetent and
spent nearly one year at Atascadero prior to being deemed restored to competency. Then
again in 2014, appellant’s counsel declared a doubt as to appellant’s competence, but
after an evaluation, appellant was found to be competent. Appellant then plead no
contest to one count of carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle by a felon (Pen. Code,
§ 25850, subd. (c)(1)), on the condition that the other count be dismissed. On
November 12, 2014, the date set for sentencing, the trial court declared a doubt as to
appellant’s competency. Dr. Gretchen White examined appellant on November 13, 2014,
and found him not competent. Dr. White noted that appellant had previously been
“floridly delusional” and had been declared incompetent on July 22, 2013 and sent to
Atascadero, for treatment. Although she found him improved as a result of his previous
stay at Atascadero and his taking of prescribed medication, she found him still “peppered
with delusional material familiar from earlier reports.” Many of his delusions center
around his neighbors causing harm to him and others, including hitting him in the head
with a Mag Light, shooting him, covering his girlfriend with hornets causing anaphylactic
shock, and raping and killing his girlfriend and roommate.
       On December 9, 2014, the parties submitted the issue of competency on
Dr. White’s report and the court found him incompetent. The matter was set for a
placement hearing. On December 19, 2014, the court ordered appellant committed to
Atascadero, with a maximum term of 4 years 4 months, with credit for 647 days.
Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, and, subsequently, appellate counsel filed an
amended notice of appeal.
       On appeal, we appointed counsel to represent appellant in this court. Appointed
counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no
specific issues. (Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 543-544 (Ben C.);
People v. Taylor (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 304.) Pursuant to Ben C., on June 15, 2015, we
notified appellant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within
30 days.
       On June 29, 2015, we received a hand-written letter from appellant. In his letter,
appellant addresses issues relating to the underlying charges and his prior conviction, but
does not address any issues related to the order of commitment which is the subject of the
instant appeal. The appellant having failed to raise any issue on appeal, we have no
alternative but to dismiss the appeal. (Ben C., supra, 40 Cal.4th 529.)
                                             2
                           DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.

                                3
                                    _____________________________________
                                               RUSHING, P.J.

WE CONCUR:

_________________________________
      PREMO, J.

_________________________________
      ELIA, J.

People v. Fischer
H041884

                                      4