Court Opinion

ID: 9389390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-25 17:00:57.853012+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:27.570723
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6770      Doc: 15         Filed: 04/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-6770

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        WILLIAM A. WHITE,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
        Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:13-cr-00013-EKD-1)

        Submitted: April 20, 2023                                         Decided: April 24, 2023

        Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        William A. White, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
        STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6770      Doc: 15         Filed: 04/24/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               William A. White appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

        compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act

        of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have reviewed the

        record and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329

        (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

        United States v. White, No. 7:13-cr-00013-EKD-1 (W.D. Va. May 12, 2022). We deny as

        moot White’s motion to remand to the district court. We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2