Court Opinion

ID: 3958496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:19:16.506835+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:42.341360
License: Public Domain

Appellant was convicted of robbery and given forty-one years in the penitentiary.
Appellant raises a question that necessitates the reversal and dismissal of the prosecution. The indictment alleges the offense to have been committed on the 29th day of February, 1910. This is an impossible date and is not therefore a sufficient allegation of time. The statute requires that there shall be some particular date mentioned. In the case of Stephens v. State, 51 Tex. Crim. 406, this precise question came before us and it was held that the indictment was not sufficient. The indictment in the Stephens case charged the offense to have been committed on June 31, 1906. The indictment was held insufficient. The authorities are collated in the Stephens case. In the Barnes case,42 Tex. Crim. 297, the indictment charged that the offense was committed on or about the _____ day of __________, A.D. 1900. That was held fatally defective.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.