Court Opinion

ID: 5942524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 05:50:42.848986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:18.524065
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), rendered May 31, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Penal Law § 220.06 [5]). Although there were some minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the principal prosecution witnesses, it is well settled that the resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.