Court Opinion

ID: 4367711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-14 08:35:12.245247+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:03.465749
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-88,948-02

                 EX PARTE RODERICK MARQUIS JOHNSON, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 983364-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Johnson v. State,

No. 01-06-00373-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 1, 2007).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective. Applicant has

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984);

Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional

facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),
                                                                                                       2

the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel

to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

claims are barred by the doctrine of laches. Before determining this, the trial court shall give

Applicant an opportunity to respond and explain his delay in filing this application. The trial court

shall then determine the performance of trial counsel was deficient and whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 13, 2019
Do not publish