Court Opinion

ID: 1002388
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:10:22.75825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:22.354920
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 00-6658

CURLY EDWARD JONES,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

W. O. FILBERT, Warden,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-2609-WMN)

Submitted:   August 30, 2000              Decided:   September 7, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curly Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Jason Frederick Trumpbour,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Curly Edward Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.    See Jones v. Filbert, No. CA-99-2609-WMN

(D. Md. Apr. 6, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2