Court Opinion

ID: 5150779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 01:54:47.627469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:52:20.380821
License: Public Domain

[1] ORDER
[2] Now on the 21st day of June 1973, this matter comes on for consideration by this Court. After having been first advised that pursuant to Article X, Section IV of The Rules Creating and Controlling the Oklahoma Bar Association that a complaint was filed by the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association on February 27, 1973 against the respondent, alleging acts of professional misconduct and that on May 18, 1973 the respondent filed a Stipulation in this matter in which he stated that he did not desire to offer a defense to said complaint and is willing to accept an Order of Suspension from the practice of law in this state for a period of two years and three months as a result of his professional misconduct and, it further appears to this Court that this Stipulation has been approved by the Board of Governors of said Association.
[3] Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the respondent, David D. Brunson, is suspended from the practice of law for professional misconduct as alleged in the complaint hereto referred to for a period of two years and three months from the date of this decree and that he will be reinstated to the practice of law in this State only if he complies with the requirements as are set forth in Article X, Section 18 of the Rules Creating and Controlling the Oklahoma Bar Association.