Court Opinion

ID: 7862134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 17:59:04.765501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:17.959840
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991); Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994).
The appeal is dismissed.