Court Opinion

ID: 9364356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-19 01:00:31.336453+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:37.618309
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10626         Document: 00516615512             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/18/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10626
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                                                                January 18, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Kelsey Marie Applegate,

                                                                  Defendant—Appellant.

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-29

   Before Smith, Southwick and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Kelsey Marie Applegate has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Applegate has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10626    Document: 00516615512         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/18/2023

                                 No. 22-10626

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2