Court Opinion

ID: 805832
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-08-02 18:25:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:18.307517
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 12-6659

JOEY KENNETH PRIDDY,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director;     LARRY   W.   JARVIS,   Warden;
GENNY BANDY, Operations Manager,

                Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.     Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00017-GEC)

Submitted:   July 26, 2012                  Decided:   August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey Kenneth Priddy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Joey Kenneth Priddy appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                   We

have     reviewed   the   record    and    find    no    reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.     Priddy v. Garman, No. 7:12-cv-00017 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14,

2012).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions    are   adequately    presented    in   the    materials

before    the   court   and   argument    would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                     2