Court Opinion

ID: 9787268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 00:14:08.798632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:36:54.144123
License: Public Domain

Justice EISMANN,
concurring:
I concur in the majority opinion, but write only to mention that appellants did not raise on appeal the following issues: (a) whether evidence of the alleged oral agreement to convey real property was barred by the parol evidence rule; (b) whether such oral agreement was within the Statute of Frauds; (c) whether signing the June 18th agreement could constitute part performance of an earlier oral agreement to convey real property; (d) whether equitable estoppel could even apply under the facts in this case. Therefore, this opinion should not be read as expressing any opinion on those issues.