Court Opinion

ID: 905243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-21 20:36:00.172622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:41.025593
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 JUN 21 2013

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 12-10359

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00353-SRB

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM*
ISRAEL CORONA,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted June 18, 2013**

Before:        TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

       Israel Corona appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for transportation of illegal aliens for

profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(A)(v)(II), and

(a)(1)(B)(i). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Corona’s

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Corona the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     12-10359