Court Opinion

ID: 656376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:45+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.579435
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 817
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Larry FURTICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Santee COOPER, South Carolina Public Service Authority,Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-1643.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 27, 1993.Decided:  October 13, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.  David C. Norton, District Judge.  (CA-92-1472-2-18AJ)
Larry Furtick, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Carol Brittian Ervin, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Furtick v. Cooper, No. CA-92-1472-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED