Court Opinion

ID: 8451207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:24:53.56417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.807612
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael F. Schulze appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schulze v. Ratley, No. 6:ll-cv-00941-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2012; Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.