Court Opinion

ID: 9645845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:36:55.814699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:14.612404
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
In appellant’s motion for rehearing, he complains of the court’s failure to discuss appellant’s point of error No. 7. We have carefully examined the motion and have again reviewed the authorities cited, both in the original opinion and in appellant’s brief. Appellant’s 7th point of error dealt with a general complaint of the trial court in awarding grossly excessive damages. Points of error 1, 2, 4 and 5 were more specific points complaining of the damage aspect of the case. We are of the opinion these points were adequately discussed in the original opinion and that the holdings thereunder properly disposed of appellant’s 7th point of error even though the opinion did not specifically spell out such holding.
We have examined appellant’s motion dealing with other phases of the court’s original opinion but we remain convinced a proper disposition of the case was reached.
It is therefore ordered that the motion for rehearing be overruled.