Court Opinion

ID: 1000095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:35:13.83991+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:46.989445
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CAROL BRAMWELL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-429)

Submitted:   October 21, 1999             Decided:   October 27, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Carol Bramwell appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) (1994) and 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3582 (West 1985 & Supp. 1999).       We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Bramwell, No. CR-91-429 (E.D. Va. June 2, 1999).     We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                   2