Court Opinion

ID: 5952553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 06:26:35.277614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:46.233825
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered May 28, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84). Its determination is to be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.