Court Opinion

ID: 9837928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-02 10:10:12.208618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:31:49.966035
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00169-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

GLORIA BUTLER,                                            §   APPEAL FROM THE
APPELLANT

V.                                                        §   87TH DISTRICT COURT

FRANKSTON INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT,                                          §   ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEE

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM
         Appellant, Gloria Butler, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion to dismiss is
granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the
party incurring same.
Opinion August 31, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                          AUGUST 31, 2023

                                        NO. 12-23-00169-CV

                               GLORIA BUTLER,
                                  Appellant
                                     V.
                   FRANKSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
                                   Appellee

                                Appeal from the 87th District Court
                    of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DCCV16-290-87)

                   THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party
incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.