Court Opinion

ID: 9902738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-27 15:22:46.186759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:22.657828
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                      Case No. 5D22-1475
                 LT Case No. 2019-CF-000375-A
                 _____________________________

STEVEN SANCHEZ,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, Daytona Beach, and Ali L.
Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R.
Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                       September 8, 2023

PER CURIAM.
       In this Anders 1 appeal, we have carefully reviewed
Appellant’s brief and the record on appeal. Finding no errors on
the face of the record as to Appellant’s adjudication of guilt and the
sentences ultimately imposed, we affirm. However, we do remand
for entry of a further amended judgment and sentence to correct
the November 28, 2022 judgment and sentence by specifically
stating that the Amended Judgment and Sentence, and all other
written sentencing orders entered on November 28, 2022, in this
case, reflect their imposition as “nunc pro tunc to May 18, 2022,
when Steven Sanchez began serving his sentence.” This remand
is to ensure that Appellant receives proper credit for all time
served in prison and in jail from May 18, 2022, when he began
serving his sentence through November 28, 2022, when he was
resentenced. Although the trial court has noted its intention to
correct the failure to note that the judgment was to be “nunc pro
tunc,” that error has not yet been corrected. Appellant need not be
present for such correction. See Rivera v. State, 638 So. 2d 148, 149
(Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

      AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, and PRATT, JJ., concur.

                  _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

    1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

                                  2