Court Opinion

ID: 7361014
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-27 00:00:18.770436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:34.201262
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10089     Document: 00516407702         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/26/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        July 26, 2022
                                  No. 22-10089
                                Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jorge Luis Diaz-Acosta,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:20-CR-511-1

   Before Stewart, Haynes, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Luis Diaz-Acosta has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz-Acosta has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10089     Document: 00516407702          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/26/2022

                                   No. 22-10089

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2