Court Opinion

ID: 49076
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:54:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:34.223492
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 18, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-51188
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERASMO ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ,
                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:05-CR-139-ALL
                        --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Erasmo Estrada-Rodriguez

has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Estrada-Rodriguez has not filed a response.    Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.