Court Opinion

ID: 8679939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:31:21.028256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.429514
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Harshaw, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C, § 3682(c) (2012), and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harshaw, No. 5:14-cr-00027-1 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,