Court Opinion

ID: 988095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:47:53.486054+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:40.146525
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7019

LEO L. MADDOX,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DAVID ODOM, Hearing Officer; MARIA BLANDSHAW,
I.A.C. Staff Coordinator, in their official
and individual capacities,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-94-1835-3-18BC)

Submitted:   December 14, 1995            Decided:   January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin
Davis McCoy, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, GRIER & HOWSER, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom,
No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2