Court Opinion

ID: 9882032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-04 21:00:51.34285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:18.857329
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6243       Doc: 33        Filed: 10/03/2023     Pg: 1 of 3

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6243

        STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        DR. GREGORY DELAND HAYNES; PHILLIP TOLMAN; DR. CLIFFORD
        CURTIS; ABHAY AGARWAL; DR. CHARLES A. LEWIS; EDDIE M.
        BUFFALOE, JR.,

                             Defendants - Appellees,

                      and

        STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY;
        TERRI CATLETT; GEORGE BAIDEN; LORI A. WISHART,

                             Defendants.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03150-D)

        Submitted: September 28, 2023                                   Decided: October 3, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6243      Doc: 33         Filed: 10/03/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. John David Kocher, SHUMAKER LOOP &
        KENDRICK, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jeffrey D. Keister, MCANGUS
        GOUDELOCK & COURIE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr
        McCullough, WALKER, ALLEN, GRICE, AMMONS, FOY, KLICK &
        MCCULLOUGH, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dotson Maldonado, BATTEN LEE,
        PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan Edgar Hall, PARKER POE ADAMS &
        BERNSTEIN LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bettina Jimille Roberts, NORTH
        CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6243      Doc: 33        Filed: 10/03/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              Steven Dixon Prentice, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order

        granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We

        have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

        court’s order. Prentice v. Haynes, No. 5:20-ct-03150-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2023). We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3