Court Opinion

ID: 9951430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-16 06:16:02.066579+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:40:25.692505
License: Public Domain

Opinion filed March 14, 2024

                                      In The

        Eleventh Court of Appeals
                                    __________

                               No. 11-24-00050-CR
                                    __________

                    IN RE LIVAN OTERO RODRIGUEZ

                                Original Proceeding

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
      Relator, Livan Otero Rodriguez, has filed this original proceeding pro se
seeking relief against the Ector County District Attorney’s Office (Respondent).
According to Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, he was indicted by an Ector
County grand jury for various offenses on July 13, 2015, and November 6, 2017.
Relator requests this court “to order the District Attorney’s Office of Ector County,
Texas to disclose” or produce “the Grand Jury panel composition and sequence of
the Indictments.”
      To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must establish that: (1) the act
sought to be compelled is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial
decision; and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law to redress the alleged harm. In
re Meza, 611 S.W.3d 383, 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (orig. proceeding).
      This court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See TEX.
CONST. art. V, §§ 5, 6 (intermediate courts of appeals only have original jurisdiction
as prescribed by law); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2023) (limited
writ powers granted to courts of appeals). We do not have writ jurisdiction over a
district attorney’s office unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction in another
proceeding. GOV’T CODE § 22.221.
      Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here, or that
the Ector County District Attorney’s Office is a party against whom we may issue a
writ under the circumstances. Because Relator’s requested relief does not involve
matters that are necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction, we do not have mandamus
jurisdiction over the District Attorney’s Office in this proceeding. As a result, we
have no jurisdiction as an intermediate appellate court to address this original
proceeding. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                               W. BRUCE WILLIAMS
                                               JUSTICE

March 14, 2024
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

                                           2