Court Opinion

ID: 4057734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 08:47:06.754014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:16.703697
License: Public Domain

Abel Attxs+a CleiK

PO 6<9K /Z302, dfiPxrOLSTfiTx          RECEIVED IN
       bu&k*} Ty 19111            C0URT 0F CRMNAL APP
                                        MQV 12 2015

Rt: Case. N0.0hi+-0D7Z1CA

       T/Uft L QouAT CAS?. HO, 11VH

       , X art )iv receipt'@f Mui le&x dakf
  QL\: n i 261$. AS X'FWously S-k-fec/ Xm
    MUh/A. YTie. ?>e/ss/J tkf was suppose is
    •frle my pflfc U ^^ /,& mH^Hp*** .
    he drd -bsjl me fW Me, d^n.r U'/mils'-
    had un] Fmstrtctlaly AfpheJ SkicX/aM

          X IfJlll CLl^Acd U&. A-t) total LOuAT Oof'CtAni'/i/o
     ™e. n/kWJe'. T?i^i|. l^ ^r ^ ^
         . ,                   ,2bf-FM3f£l HathJ He T^773au