Court Opinion

ID: 9550835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:43:09.461193+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:22:31.316021
License: Public Domain

Williams, J.
(concurring specially) — Ms. Emerson’s two assignments of error challenge the finding of the court as to *243what transpired and the refusal of the court to exclude the evidence of Mr. Du as a matter of public policy because the money he used to finance the five occasions was supplied by the police. As to the first assignment, there is substantial evidence to support the finding. As to the second, I believe that it was improper for the police to furnish money to be used in this way. However, rather than exclude Mr. Du’s testimony because the conduct of the police is shocking, Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 10 L. Ed. 2d 726, 83 S. Ct 1623 (1963), I believe resolution of that problem is best left to administrative or legislative action.