Court Opinion

ID: 3114408
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:24:10.75121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:52:51.289579
License: Public Domain

02-11-405, 407-412, 414-CV

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-11-00405-CV
 
 

Willie Lavan

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00407-CV
 
 

Leroy Ross

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00408-CV
 
 

Floyd Townsend

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE 

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00409-CV
 
 

Gilbert McNeil

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE 

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00410-CV
 
 

Charles King

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE 

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00411-CV
 
 

Thomas Jackson

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00412-CV
 
 

Ted Flemings

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE

 
AND
 
NO. 02-11-00414-CV
 
 

Charles Booker

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

 

APPELLEE

 
 
------------
 
FROM THE 96th
District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1] AND
JUDGMENT
------------
 
On
the court=s own motion, the above causes are
hereby consolidated in this court.  Each cause shall continue to bear its
respective case number.
          On
January 13, 2012, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible
for preparing the record in the above appeals informed the court that payment
arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  See Tex. R. App. P.
35.3(a)(2).  We stated that we would dismiss these appeals for want of
prosecution unless appellants made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record
and provided this court with proof of payment.
          Because
appellants have not made payment arrangements for the
clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that these appeals should be
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellants
shall pay all costs of the appeals, for which let execution issue.
 
PER CURIAM
 
PANEL: 
LIVINGSTON,
C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
 
DELIVERED: 
February 23, 2012

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.