Court Opinion

ID: 8267394
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:11:34.060088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:24.610410
License: Public Domain

Bedle, J.
The question on this appeal is purely of fact- — -Whether the deed sought to be set aside was in fraud of creditors ? *583The transaction is very suspicions, but the evidence fails to sufficiently satisfy us that it was fraudulent. The decree of ■¡he Chancellor must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Eor affirmance — Beasley, C. J., Bedle, Clement, Dalkimele, Deetje, Dodd, Ogden, Scudded, Van Syckel, WOODIIULL. 10.
For reversal — None.