Court Opinion

ID: 9643031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 18:16:08.316852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:55:56.534731
License: Public Domain

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
The district judge also found that the TVA board had very far-reaching plans for social experimentation which he thought beyond the constitutional limits of the federal power. This case is not to be decided by the purposes and plans of the board, but by the validity of what is about to be done under the attacked contracts. The contracts deal only with surplus power arising at the Wilson Dam which may, as we hold, be disposed of by Congress. The manner of the disposal of public property and the extent to which it may be allowed to affect private business are within the discretion of Congress. An exercise of legislative discretion is reviewable at the ballot box rather than in the courts.