Court Opinion

ID: 1022887
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:29:38.345723+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:06.090260
License: Public Domain

*275
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Williams, Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Williams v. Starling,
  
  No. 1:02-cv-00014 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.