Court Opinion

ID: 8650123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 20:24:31.088782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:29.693699
License: Public Domain

SULLIVAN, Chief Judge
(dissenting):
Appellant and Specialist T were assigned to different companies in the same battalion. He was married; she was not. Physical altercations between the two preceded and succeeded the challenged sexual acts. Evidence of the above was sufficient to present the question of indecency to the members for their determination. See United States v. Choate, 32 MJ 423 (CMA 1991); United States v. Hobbs, 7 USCMA 693, 699-700, 23 CMR 157, 163-64 (1957).