Court Opinion

ID: 1007116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:20:39.726252+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:57.880259
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-6102

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

KAY OLDHAM MILLER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-98-97, CA-01-149)

Submitted:   March 14, 2002                 Decided:   March 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kay Oldham Miller, Appellant Pro Se.     Paul Alexander Weinman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Kay Oldham Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).     We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-98-97; CA-01-149

(M.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2