Court Opinion

ID: 3284695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:59:15.428244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:29.294050
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
[1] This application is not materially different from Criminal No. 1464, wherein C.A. Stice made a similar application on behalf of Craniczny. The additional matters set forth in the petition herein could not be proved without referring to the evidence received in the trial before the recorder's court. But such evidence may not be considered in this proceeding. (In reKaster, 52 Cal.App. 454 [198 P. 1029]; In re Kaster,185 Cal. 647 [198 P. 1031].) The application for a writ is denied.