Court Opinion

ID: 5879608
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:12:42.97664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:58.168212
License: Public Domain

Motion for reargument granted to the extent that the first sentence of the memorandum decision dated March 1, 1985 (109 AD2d 1084) amended to read as follows: "Defendant’s two consecutive sentences of 2-1/3 to 7 years on convictions of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny and possession of burglar’s tools for a minimum term of 4-2/3 and a maximum term of 14 years, were not excessive.” Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.