Court Opinion

ID: 9642808
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 18:09:36.712299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:52.632497
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Griffin
joined by Justices Smith, Culver and Calvert, dissenting.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case.
I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and in addition delete from the trial court’s judgment the word “stockholders” so that a stockholder would not be enjoined in this cause. I can see no reason why the stockholder who happens to be a lawyer should not engage in the legitimate practice of the law in preparation of the instrument in which this corporation might be interested.
Opinion delivered April 18, 1956.
Rehearing overruled July 11, 1956.