Court Opinion

ID: 9810603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:54:01.092797+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:04.426697
License: Public Domain

GILDEA, Chief Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent and join Justice Page’s dissent in part. I agree with Justice Page that the State did not meet its burden to prove exigency, and I join in sections I and II of Justice Page’s dissent on the exigency issue except to the extent he discusses State v. Bernard, 859 N.W.2d 762 (Minn.2015).
For the reasons set forth in my separate dissent in State v. Lindquist, 869 N.W.2d 868, 2015 WL 4928147 (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I would not apply the good faith exception in this case.