Court Opinion

ID: 3178124
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-18 01:04:11.246966+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:29.637923
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-10215      Document: 00513382849         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/17/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 15-10215
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 17, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Chivo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:14-CR-236-4

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Martin Rodriguez Martinez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011).    Rodriguez Martinez has filed a response.              We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Rodriguez Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-10215   Document: 00513382849    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/17/2016

                               No. 15-10215

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

                                     2