Court Opinion

ID: 2920122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 01:18:18.588378+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:54.711393
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-02-539-CV
 
                             COURT OF APPEALS
 
                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                                CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
 
CITY OF HIDALGO,                                                               Appellant,
 
                                                   v.
 
HUGO
GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND 
AS
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 
MARIA CRISTINA GONZALEZ, DECEASED,                               Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
 
                        On appeal from the 92nd  District Court
                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
 
                                   O P I N I O N
 
               Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hinojosa 
Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant, CITY
OF HIDALGO, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd
District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-883-01-A.  After the clerk=s record was filed,
appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. 
In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and
appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss
the appeal.
The Court, having
considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion
that the motion should be granted. 
Appellant=s motion to dismiss is
granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 31st
day of October, 2002.