Court Opinion

ID: 7421782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:43:05.322056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:21.076617
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A
ALLEN, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.