Court Opinion

ID: 9929741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-03 21:00:56.731834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:44:44.901771
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110      Doc: 5        Filed: 02/02/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-2110

        JERMALL BROWN,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ.; MARTIN / ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY;
        MAGISTRATE SUMLIN; JUDGE RUBIN; JUDGE PHILIP JACKSON; JUDGE
        KENDRA AUSBY; JUDGE J. SCHIFFER; JUDGE MIDDLETON; SPECIAL
        COUNSEL KIM TAM; JUDGE WILLIAMS.; JUDGE MICHAEL DIPIETRO;
        JUDGE TANNER; CHAUTAUQUA D. HOOKER,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-01317-LKG)

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                       Decided: February 2, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jermall Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110       Doc: 5         Filed: 02/02/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Jermall Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under

        28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) without prejudice. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v. BOCSE

        McGuire, Esq., No. 1:23-cv-01317-LKG (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

               ∗
                 The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the district
        court dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th
        790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).

                                                      2