Court Opinion

ID: 7185782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:52:15.998273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:03.975954
License: Public Domain

Laud, J.
Antoine Gassen died in July, 1848, leaving a widow in community, five children, and a succession inventoried at over $19,000, including- several slaves.
One of his children, J. B. Gassen, was of age, another, Cothilde, was emancipated by marriage to Louis Gordon, and the other three, Jeannette, Adelaide and Antoine, were minors.
In August, 1848, tho widow, the natural tutrix of the minors, retaining the possession and administration of the property of the succession, entered into a partnership with her son, J. B. Gassen, and her son-in-law, Louis Gordon, for the *6purposes of keeping a ferry, running a schooner, and carrying on respectively the business of a cigar manufactory, grocery, and the keeping' of horses at livery.
Three of the slaves belonging to the succession were constantly employed by the partnership in keeping the ferry, up to the time of the death of the widow, in July, 1852.
This suit is' brought by the minor heirs, to recover from the surviving partners, J. B. Gassen and Louis Gordon, the value of the services of these slaves and the fruits and revenues of other property belonging to the succession, during the continuance of the partnership, so far as they were entitled to the same, as heirs at law of Antoine Gassen, deceased.
The defendants excepted to the plaintiffs’ demands, on the ground that the matters and facts contained in their petition, pertain to a partnership formerly existing between themselves and the widow of Antoine Gassen, and can only be adjudicated upon, on a settlement of the partnership affairs.
The exception was overruled, and the defendants pleaded a general denial, admitting however the partnership.
The question therefore presented, is, whether the plaintiffs, heirs at law at the time of the institution of this suit, of both Antoine Gassen and his widow, can recover a debt due by the partnership, from the surviving partners, before a final settlement and liquidation of its affairs.
The plaintiffs were not members of the partnership, nor had their natural tutrix the right to make them such, and subject their interests in the succession of their father to the hazards of trade or speculation. The widow was a partner in her individual capacity, and on her personal responsibility, and not as the tutrix or representative of the minors. And the partnership could as validly have become the debtors of the minors, by the use and appropriation of their property, as they could have become the debtors of other parties.
The minors were third persons as to this partnership, and have a right to sue for a debt due them, before a final settlement and liquidation of its affairs.
The plaintiffs are the beneficiary heirs to the succession of their mother, and are only liable for her debts, to the amount of assets that may come from her succession into their hands, These assets are subject to the demands of the defendants, if, on a final settlement of the partnership affairs, the widow should be indebted to them; but beyond the amount of these assets, the defendants can have no recourse against her heirs, and are bound to pay the debts sued for, although the succession of the widow Gassen should be insolvent.
The debt sued for is not an asset of the mother’s succession.
It is, therefore, clear, that there can be no legal reason for the suspension of the plaintiffs’ demand until a settlement of the partnership affairs.
The remaining question, therefore is, what interest had the minors in these slaves, and what amount the surviving partners owe for their services during the continuance of the partnership.
The widow was the owner of an undivided half interest, by virtue of her community rights; /. B. Gassen and the wife of Louis Gordon were owners of two-fifths of the other half, and the plaintiffs the remaining three-fifths.
The evidence sufficiently shows, that the services of the slaves were worth $600 per annum, and that the partnership enjoyed the benefit of their labor for four years. Of this amount, the widow was entitled to $1200 ; /. B. Gassen and Mrs. Gordon were entitled each to $240, leaving due to the plaintiffs, from the partnership, $720.
*7This debt was due by the partners in solido ; but the plaintiffs having become heirs at law to the widow Gassen, one-third of this debt became extinguished by confusion, to the benefit of which her co-partners are entitled. 0. 0., Art. 2215 ; Potliier on Obligations, p. 332.
It, therefore, appears, that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs, as heirs of Antoine Gassen, for a partnership debt, in the sum of $480.
The plaintiffs also claim of the defendants the value of the services of the same slaves, and the fruits and revenues of other property, after the dissolution of the partnership. The evidence is, however, insufficient to enable the court to render a judgment on this part of their demand. Their rights, however, will be reserved.
The plaintiffs failed to prove that the partnership enjoyed the fruits and revenues of any other property belonging to the succession of Antoine Gassen, except the labor and services of the three slaves.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be reversed, and that the plaintiffs, as heirs at law of Antoine Gassen, recover of the defendants in solido, the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars, with legal interest from judicial demand; and that defendants pay the costs of the lower court, and the plaintiffs pay the costs of this appeal. And it is further ordered and decreed, that' the rights of the plaintiffs, as heirs of Antoine Gassen, against the defendants, accruing subsequently to the dissolution of the partnership between the widow Gassen and said defendants, be reserved ; and that the rights of plaintiffs as heirs of the widow Gassen, be reserved generally against the defendants, so far as they have not been determined in this suit.