Court Opinion

ID: 8065874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 05:39:39.56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:12.058175
License: Public Domain

Houghton, J.:
The order should be affirmed on the authority of Dieterlin v. Miller (114 App. Div. 40); in which, on submission of controversy, plaintiff was relieved from his agreement to purchase premises sub-pet to a covenant less broad than that with -which the premises in ■<j lestion are incumbered. The fair interpretation of the terms of sale,'aside from the fact that it was a judicial sale, is that there were no other incumbrances' upon the premises than those specifically mentioned.
O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham and Clarke, JJ., concurred; Scott, J., dissented.