Court Opinion

ID: 4321898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-17 20:29:04.131076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:18.556740
License: Public Domain

People v Broderick (2018 NY Slip Op 06930)

People v Broderick

2018 NY Slip Op 06930

Decided on October 17, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 17, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2012-02839
 (Ind. No. 11256/08)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v Clifton Broderick, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed February 28, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Although the defendant has served his sentence, the question of whether the sentence imposed should be reduced is not academic, because the sentence imposed has potential immigration consequences (see People v Ayala, 142 AD3d 1095, 1095; People v Aisewomhonio, 131 AD3d 1177, 1178). Considering all the relevant circumstances of this case, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court