Court Opinion

ID: 9370677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-14 16:01:06.480543+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:23.024124
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 20-5297                                                   September Term, 2022
                                                              FILED ON: FEBRUARY 14, 2023
JOHN DOE, M.D., PH.D.,
                    APPELLANT

JOHN DOE, M.D., PH.D., P.L.L.C.,
                    APPELLEE

       v.

JUDITH RODGERS, M.H.A. AS SENIOR ADVISOR IN DIVISION OF PRACTITIONER DATA BANKS, ET
AL.,
                   APPELLEES

                           Appeal from the United States District Court
                                   for the District of Columbia
                                       (No. 1:12-cv-01229)

       Before: HENDERSON and RAO, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.

                                        JUDGMENT

       The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not
warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). It is:

       ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinions signed on June
17, 2015, and September 10, 2020.

       The Clerk will withhold the mandate until seven days after any timely petition for rehearing
or rehearing en banc is resolved. See FED. R. APP. P. 41(b); D.C. CIR. R. 41(a)(1).

                                                                     FOR THE COURT:
                                                                     Mark J. Langer, Clerk

                                                             BY:     /s/
                                                                     Daniel J. Reidy
                                                                     Deputy Clerk