Court Opinion

ID: 7146000
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:34:33.038968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:59.144455
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) dismissal of his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing his adversary action, which challenged the transfer of his property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s order filed August 8, 2000.
Fikrou’s remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.