Court Opinion

ID: 2690793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:52:12.65973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:14.600730
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen, 132 Ohio St. 3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]

           THE STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ALLEN, JUDGE.
                 [Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen,
                        132 Ohio St. 3d 126, 2012-Ohio-2571.]
Cause dismissed based on mootness.
       (No. 2011-1643—Submitted May 22, 2012—Decided June 13, 2012.)
                                      IN MANDAMUS.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ evidence and briefs, this cause
is dismissed based on mootness.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Graydon Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., and John C. Greiner, for relators.
        Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J.
Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
                               ______________________