Court Opinion

ID: 6730497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:11:33.527081+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:39.101325
License: Public Domain

WASHBURN, J.
Statute providing that judgments rendered by inferior courts “may be reversed, vacated, or modified by the common pleas court,” the question arose in this cáse whether or not the common pleas court has the power to affirm the judgments of such inferior courts. Summit Common Pleas held that it had such power. Error was prosecuted to the Court of Appeals which held:
1. Where a court having power to reverse, vacate or modify, decides not to reverse, vacate or modify certain judgments, its decision must take the form of a judgment, and a judgment of affirmance is the accepted form of expressing such a decision of the court.
2. The statute in question was originally in a chapter applying not only to the Common Pleas Court, but to the old District Court and to the Supreme Court, and the language used was the same in reference to all said courts.
3. In no statute was it specifically provided that any of the said courts could affirm a judgment, but from the beginning and for more than a century, all of said courts expressed their refusal to- reverse, by a judgment of affirmance, and the question now presented, apparently has never before been raised — probably for the simple reason that it was recognized by everyone that the affirmance of a judgment was simply nothing more than the refusal to reverse, vacate or modify the same. But whatever the reason, the construction of the statute is too well and firmly established to be questioned at this late day.
Judgment of Common Pleas affirmed.