Court Opinion

ID: 9737052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:14:11.858663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:13.713168
License: Public Domain

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶11 agree we are without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of the order granting summary judgment in favor of Appel-lee PNMCI. I also agree that Appellee USF & G did not owe Appellants coverage *182for the claims made against them. However, I do so for a reason different from that expressed by the Majority. In my view, the claim against Appellants is excluded by the plain language of the policy. The policy specifically excluded “faulty workmanship,” while including coverage for damages resulting from such faulty workmanship. USF & G Builders’ Risk Policy, 10/19/1984, at 2. The underlying claim was based on Appellants’ failure to properly perform the work for which they were hired, not for damages to persons or property resulting from poor workmanship. The costs to repair the work completed by Appellants are not covered under the USF & G policy.