Court Opinion

ID: 6248197
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:06:13.697513+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:21.056407
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
As evidence of her title to the land from which the appellant cut the timber the plaintiff produced and offered at the trial the assignment to her by John M. Chase, her. father-in-law, dated February 26, 1879. To repel the presumption that it had been delivered to her, appellant called B. F. Chase, a son of John M. Chase and one of his executors, who testified that after his father’s death he found the assignment in a box or the safe that had belonged to him. He was not certain whether he found it in the box or safe, but thought that most of the papers were in the safe, and the contention of the appellant is that it was there found. The witness, however, testified still further that various kinds of paper, such as contracts and insurance policies, belonging toother members of the family, were found in the safe, and added, “ Father’s safe was everybody’s safe.” There were facts and circumstances from which the *48jury' could fairly have inferred that the deceased had actually passed the title to his daughter-in-law; and the finding of the assignment in his safe after his death is entirely consistent with his delivery of it to her, in view of the explanation of the son, called by the defendant, that the safe was “ everybody’s safe,” for she may have deposited it there as other members of the family had deposited their papers in it. The question of delivery was purely one of fact for the jury and was submitted to them under proper and careful' instructions. The offer which is the subject of the third assignment of error was properly disallowed, for it was not to show that the appellee, by anything she had said or done, had estopped herself from asserting her title.
Judgment affirmed.