Court Opinion

ID: 9407703
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-08 00:01:15.229189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:39.742502
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11197         Document: 00516813018             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/07/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11197
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                     July 7, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   Alvin S. Carter,                                                                    Clerk

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellant,

                                             versus

   The State of Texas,

                                                Defendant—Appellee.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:22-CV-2120
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          Alvin S. Carter appeals the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of his
   civil suit relating to his Texas conviction for theft. Carter offers no coherent
   legal argument that the district court erred by dismissing his case as frivolous.
   See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.
   1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.