Court Opinion

ID: 998807
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:16:19.744955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:14.680755
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DENNIS CARL HARRIS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-92-113-N, CA-97-389-2)

Submitted:   May 18, 1999                   Decided:   May 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Edward Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Laura
Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dennis Carl Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-92-

113-N; CA-97-389-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 1998; July 15, 1998).     We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2