Court Opinion

ID: 4468822
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-01 01:00:22.209059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:47.666636
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-20147      Document: 00515253827         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/31/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                        December 31, 2019
                                    No. 19-20147                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Conference Calendar                            Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LAWRENCE BENJAMIN GORDON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:18-CR-22-2

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Lawrence Benjamin Gordon has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Gordon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-20147    Document: 00515253827    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/31/2019

                                No. 19-20147

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2