Court Opinion

ID: 4249107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-28 20:00:22.289854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:11.321204
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 17-7323

RONALD MCCLARY,

                     Plaintiff - Appellant,

              v.

LIEUTENANT CROSSON; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER
WALLS,

                     Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03259-D)

Submitted: February 22, 2018                                  Decided: February 28, 2018

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Crosson, No. 5:15-ct-03259-D (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2