Court Opinion

ID: 9639136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 16:05:41.399583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:12.919191
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for rehearing is overruled. In deference however, to the just criticism of the statement in the opinion, “The Louisiana cases cited dealt with the effect, not of dissolution, hut of receivership, and correctly denied to a receivership in another state the effect of á dissolution there,” we withdraw the sentence, substituting therefor the following:
Neither of the Louisiana cases cited dealt with the effect of insolvency proceedings in another state, upon the suability of the company in Louisiana in a suit purely in person-am, but only with the contention unsuccessfully made in the State of Washington Case, supra, that the proceedings had revoked the designation. It was not contended in the Pair Case that the proceedings in Pennsylvania had effected the civil death of the company.
There was, too, in the Pair Case an attachment upon property as well as service upon the insurance commissioner. In the Federico Co. Case, the point argued and decided was whether insolvency proceedings in another state, of which the insured had no notice, bad operated, as to an after-occurring loss, to eaneel a policy upon which the insured had been relying-as in force.