Court Opinion

ID: 7824704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 18:04:07.922782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:49.667050
License: Public Domain

Robert L. Brown, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision. Our rules clearly state that if our action under Rule 9 is unduly harsh, we may allow the appellant to reprint his brief at his own expense to conform to Rule 9(d), and we may further assess the expense for any revision of appellee’s brief against appellant. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9(e)(2). The result in this case is unduly harsh, and the appellant should be allowed to refile his brief as provided under Rule 9(e)(2). I would grant the petition in accordance with this. Corbin, J., joins.