Court Opinion

ID: 546614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:48:46.080802
License: Public Domain

911 F.2d 726Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy Webber TINDER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6324.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 1990.Decided July 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge.  (CR No. 86-73-N)
Roy Webber Tinder, Jr., appellant pro se.
Susan Lynn Watt, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Roy Webber Tinder, Jr. appeals from the district court's order which denied his Rule 35(a) motion to correct his sentence.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Tinder, CR-86-73-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 1990)  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.