Court Opinion

ID: 2964394
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:25:01.03782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:11:09.361270
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1549

                                   JUAN M COFIELD,

                                      Appellant,

                                          v.

                              JOHN O. DESMOND, TRUSTEE,

                                      Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                    [Hon. George A. O'Toole, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Juan M. Cofield on brief pro se.
            _______________
            John O. Desmond on brief pro se.
            _______________

                                 ____________________

                                   October 9, 1996
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   After carefully reviewing the  briefs
                      __________

            and  the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court

            for the  reasons stated  in its  Memorandum and  Order, dated

            April 10, 1996.   Simply,  appellant Juan M.  Cofield has  no

            standing to  pursue this appeal, having  completely failed to

            show that he is not insolvent.  See  In re El San Juan Hotel,
                                            ___  _______________________

            809  F.2d 151, 154 (1st Cir. 1987).

                      Affirmed.    Appellant's  motion  for  sanctions is
                      ________

            denied.

                                         -2-