Court Opinion

ID: 2926834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:39:52.574276+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:02.892225
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00721-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

MIRTA ZORILLA,                                                                 Appellant,

                                            v.

THE HOMEOWNERS OF PLAZAS
DEL LAGO, INC., ET AL.,                            Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

               On Appeal from the 139th District Court
                     of Hidalgo County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on April 24, 2009. On May 14,

2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly

injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been

received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 18th day of June, 2009.

                                             2