Court Opinion

ID: 988089
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:47:50.30937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:36.435477
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-6985

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DARREN ANDREW DICKERSON,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-163, CA-95-118-2)

Submitted:   December 14, 1995            Decided:   January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darren Andrew Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se.     Rebecca A. Betts,
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dickerson,
Nos. CR-92-163; CA-95-118-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 26, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2