Court Opinion

ID: 8465218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:57:07.935047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.762805
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hugh Epps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Epps, No. 3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.