Court Opinion

ID: 6163923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 18:24:37.380264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:33.330757
License: Public Domain

Van Wyck, J.
In the warehouse of defendant there were hatches or openings in each floor directly over each other, for the purposes of raising and. lowering merchandise. The contention of plaintiff is that Peter McCoy fell from the upper floor through these hatches," and thus was killed. Plaintiff insists that the fact that the doors or covers had not been placed over the hatches the night before was such negligence as rendered the defendant liable for the death of Peter McCoy. The evidence overwhelmingly establishes that it was the duty of Peter McCoy, James O’Eeil, and Antony Flaherty, three-employes of defendant, to cover the hatches in .question at the end of each day, which duty they failed to perform, though they were employed for that purpose, and were directed to do so. It is manifest that their neglect in that respect does not devolve upon defendant, their employer, liability to them, or either of them, for injuries caused thereby. The nonsuit was properly granted, and the judgment herein must be affirmed, with costs.