Court Opinion

ID: 1006859
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:17:14.176186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:45.838900
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  George L. Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Haynesworth,
  
  No. CR-00-65 (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
   
   *198
   
  the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.