Court Opinion

ID: 9468250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 02:09:18.701179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:40:46.823826
License: Public Domain

*856TAMM, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the result:
Although the court’s holding may be “very narrow,” at 855, I question the creation of a rich vein of dicta for the delight of future prospectors of the law. I concur in the result reached by the court.
On Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc (D.C. Civil Action No. 76-1404).
Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, MacKIN-NON, ROBB, and WILKEY, Circuit Judges
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc, the letter received from counsel for appellee (Justice) pursuant to Rule 28(j), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and appellant’s supplemental memorandum in support of its suggestion for rehearing en banc, having been transmitted to the full Court and no judge in regular active service having requested a vote with respect thereto, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, en banc, that appellant’s aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.