Court Opinion

ID: 7765801
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:44:35.849411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:56.700239
License: Public Domain

WELLS, Judge.
In this petition for writ of certiorari, the City of Miami challenges a decision of the circuit court appellate division that found the City’s vehicle impoundment ordinances unconstitutional. For the following reasons, we grant the petition.
The City impounded Respondent Gayle Sinopoli’s car under sections 42-120 through 42-125 of the City of Miami Code. Respondent Sinopoli challenged the im-poundment in an administrative proceeding. After losing before the hearing officer, Sinopoli appealed to the circuit court appellate division on the sole basis that the vehicle impoundment ordinances were unconstitutional. The circuit court agreed, finding that sections 42-120 through 42-125 of the City of Miami Code violated the eighth amendment of the United States Constitution.
The City files this petition for writ of certiorari claiming that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law and denied the City due process by declaring the ordinances unconstitutional. We agree. Respondent Sinopoli could not challenge the constitutionality of the ordinances on appeal to the circuit court. Miami-Dade Co. v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc., 863 So.2d 195 (Fla.2003)(finding that “a petition seeking certiorari review is not the proper procedural vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance”). Instead, the constitutionality of the ordinances must be determined in original proceedings before the circuit court. Id.
Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the decision of the circuit court appellate division, and remand this cause to the circuit court for a determination consistent with this court’s recent opinion in City of Miami v. Wellman, No. 01-3050, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 231192 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 4, 2004).