Court Opinion

ID: 988687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:55:47.080925+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.457042
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7808

STUART SANDERS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RONALD
ANGELONE, Director; MR. CUMMINS, Counselor;
MR. WRIGHT, Warden of Work Release Unit,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-94-796)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sanders v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-796
(E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2