Court Opinion

ID: 4477372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-16 21:12:30.143564+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:31.961661
License: Public Domain

Murdock, /., dissenting: The legislative history of section 117 (k) indicates clearly that Congress was trying to give capital gains treatment to timber owners when they disposed of their timber. See Helga Carlen, 20 T. C. 573. This taxpayer seems to come precisely within the terms of section 117 (k) (2) and, therefore, is entitled to its benefits. I also have doubt on the depletion issue. The facts in regard to the true content were reasonably ascertainable during the taxable year, and under such circumstances a reasonable allowance for depletion could be based on such ascertainable facts.