Court Opinion

ID: 4810123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-21 10:41:52.979291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:34.880136
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling, but reverse the judgment for grand theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish the value of the items at the time of the theft. Smith v. State, 955 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). We, therefore, remand for entry of a judgment for petit theft pursuant to section 812.014(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.