Court Opinion

ID: 9643277
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 20:24:31.422425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:59.004139
License: Public Domain

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice (dissenting). I vote against the issuance of the Writ of Prohibition in this case at this time. I feel that the remedy by Appeal (under § 27-2102, Ark. Stats.) is adequate; and that the case should be reviewed on appeal in the regular manner, rather than by the extraordinary writ, as is here attempted. Furthermore, even if the application for writ of prohibition be treated as an appeal — concerning the propriety of which I am in doubt — nevertheless I feel that the order of the Chancery Court should remain in force until the case is briefed and heard on its merits.