Court Opinion

ID: 5853511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 00:33:52.118617+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:10.908876
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determi*1311nation of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with the use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge with the explanation that he was exposed to heavy secondhand smoke as a result of other inmates smoking in the dorm showers. The Hearing Officer rejected petitioner’s defense and found him guilty of the charged rule violation. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Petitioner is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination of guilt by virtue of his plea of guilty with an explanation to the charge (see Matter of McMoore v Bezio, 67 AD3d 1218 [2009]; Matter of Singleton v Dubray, 61 AD3d 1223, 1224 [2009]). Furthermore, petitioner’s procedural challenges, including that the Hearing Officer refused to consider his defense, are unpreserved for our review given his failure to raise them at the hearing (see Matter of Shannon v Fischer, 73 AD3d 1373, 1374 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 708 [2010]; Matter of Perez v Goord, 304 AD2d 939, 939 [2003]).
Peters, PJ., Spain, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.