Court Opinion

ID: 6351252
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-21 09:11:18.058653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:32.305887
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-22-00221-CR

                                  The State of Texas, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                Sotero Hector Ramirez, Appellee

            FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY
          NO. 46,965, THE HONORABLE BARBARA MOLINA, JUDGE PRESIDING

                 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

               The State appeals from the trial court’s pre-trial order granting Sotero Hector

Ramirez’s motion to suppress certain evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. 44.01(a)(5). The

State has now filed a motion to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry

of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

               The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that “upon the request of the losing

party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential findings,” which the

court defined as “findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate court

with a basis upon which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts.” State v.

Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Those findings must be “adequate and

complete, covering every potentially dispositive issue that might reasonably be said to have

arisen in the course of the suppression proceedings,” State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 676 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2011), including “explicit credibility determination[s]” regarding the witnesses who

testified at the suppression hearing, State v. Mendoza, 365 S.W.3d 666, 673 (Tex. Crim. App.

2012). When a trial court fails to make such findings of fact and conclusions of law, we are

authorized to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of “essential

findings.” See Elias, 339 S.W.3d at 677 (citing Tex. R. App. P. 44.4).

               Before filing its notice of appeal, the State filed a request for the trial court to

issue findings of fact and conclusions of law related to its ruling on Ramirez’s motion to

suppress. The record before us does not contain findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial

court so that it may enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. A supplemental clerk’s record

containing those findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed with this Court no later

than July 18, 2022. This appeal will be reinstated once the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

               It is so ordered June 17, 2022

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 17, 2022

Do Not Publish

                                                2