Court Opinion

ID: 4122418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-01 20:09:29.113232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:18.629010
License: Public Domain

People v Robinson (2017 NY Slip Op 00666)

People v Robinson

2017 NY Slip Op 00666

Decided on February 1, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 1, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
L. PRISCILLA HALL
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2014-08911
 (Ind. No. 1672/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRashun Robinson, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed September 3, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, HALL, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court