Court Opinion

ID: 3895685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:27:39.518129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:54:33.728405
License: Public Domain

Case. — The second count stated an order drawn by the defendant on William Love, the plaintiff, in favor of Abner Bush, for a horse, stating that he would be security for the payment of the horse. An order was produced directed to David Love, upon which William Love, the plaintiff, delivered the horse to Bush.
Evidence of the handwriting cannot be received; Bush's testimony would be the best evidence; this is admitted at the bar. By the English practice, if a witness be beyond the reach of the process of the: court, secondary evidence may be received.1 This has not been our practice, where the evidence, of a witness is known to be in another State, his deposition ought to be taken. It is admitted that Bush is in Ohio, and the circumstance of his telling the counsel that he would not attend cannot alter the case.
 Nonsuit.
1 See 2 East, 250; 4 Johns. 461.