Court Opinion

ID: 747427
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 22:59:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:05.277499
License: Public Domain

127 F.3d 1106
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Allen R. TURK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James GOMEZ, Theo White, D. Greene, P.M. Scott, J. Demasa,Attorney General of the State of California,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-16234.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 1997.**Decided Oct. 24, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-93-1925-LKK;  Lawrence K. Karlton, Chief Judge, Presiding.
Before THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
This appeal from the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.  We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

3
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief.  See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995).  The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant's request for preliminary injunctive relief was moot because appellees had corrected the harms complained of.  See id.   The court's factual findings and application of legal standards are not clearly erroneous.  See id.   Accordingly, the court's order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed.

4
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed. R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4;  9th Cir.  R. 3-3(d)

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3