Court Opinion

ID: 2923466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:31:09.893726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:32.943126
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-095-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________                                                                
                          IN RE MARTHA L. ARANGO                              
__________________________________________________________________
 
                      On Petition for Writ of
Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez
and Castillo
                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
 

Relator, Martha L.
Arango, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on March 3, 2006.  Real
Party in Interest, John G. Garcia, filed a response on March 7, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response,
is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief
sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition
for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 10th day of March, 2006.
 

[1]
See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing
opinions and memorandum opinions).