Court Opinion

ID: 3669735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:18:37.939274+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:51.732716
License: Public Domain

The lessor of the plaintiff showed that the land in controversy had been patented, and then gave in evidence a sheriff's deed to himself, setting forth that he, the sheriff, sold the land for the tax due for the year 1833, amounting to 31 1/4 cents, and for charges. He also proved the defendant to be in possession. The defense relied upon was that the plaintiff's lessor had not proved that the tax of 1833 was due. His Honor intimated an opinion that the plaintiff's lessor was required to prove that the tax of 1833 was due, for the purpose of showing that the sheriff had *Page 410 
power to make the sale. Upon this intimation the lessor of the plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit and appealed.
In ordinary cases, where a party claims under a sheriff, he is compelled to produce a judgment and execution against the debtor, as well as the sheriff's deed. If the owner of the land was indebted for the taxes the lessor of the plaintiff had it in his power to show that fact from the records of the court. The law requires all persons to list with the justice their taxable property. If an owner of land neglects to attend the justice and give in his list the justice is directed to appoint a freeholder in the neighborhood to value the land on oath, and the freeholder is to return the valuation to the justice who adds it to his list and returns it into the County Court. In case of the failure of the owner and the magistrate, it then is the duty of the sheriff, within the time prescribed for collecting the taxes, to summon a freeholder to value the land on oath. A fair transcript of such valuation the freeholder is directed to send to the (522) clerk of the County Court, before the next succeeding court, and the clerk shall incorporate the return with those made by the justice. And the freeholder is also to deliver to the sheriff another transcript of the same. The tax lists thus returned are directed to be recorded by the clerk. These records, as it seems to us, are in the nature of judgments against each individual on the lists for the sums respectively set against their names. Within thirty days after the court to which the lists are returned the clerk is to deliver a copy of the lists to the sheriff and he is to collect the taxes due by distress and sale or otherwise. The certified copies of the tax lists delivered by the clerk to the sheriff are, in law, his warrants of distress, or executions against the property of each individual for the satisfaction of the money due on them. If there is no personal property to be found the sheriff is to distrain the land, and after advertising the same as the law directs, and also performing the duties prescribed by the act of 1819, 1 Rev. Stat., c. 102, ss. 52 and 53, he will sell the same, or so much thereof as shall be sufficient for the payment of the taxes due, and the costs of the sale. It seems to us, therefore, that until it be shown by competent evidence that a specific tax has been legally ascertained to be due, the authority of the sheriff to sell for a tax does not appear, and as his sale can operate to transfer title only by force of his authority, unless that authority be shown his deed passes no estate.
PER CURIAM.                                       Judgment affirmed.
Cited: Garrett v. White, 38 N.C. 134; Jordan v. Rouse, 46 N.C. 122;Fox v. Stafford, 90 N.C. 298. *Page 411 
(523)