Court Opinion

ID: 5100616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 20:51:55.328559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:00.850311
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
James N. Apollo appeals from a trial court judgment denying in part and granting in part his Motion to Modify Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The judgment also granted in part and denied in part Donna Apollo’s Counter-Motion to Modify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 976 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).