Court Opinion

ID: 9365701
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-24 19:00:27.515463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:47.252040
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10491         Document: 00516621038             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/24/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-10491                                   FILED
                                                                                January 24, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Domingo Antonio Bonilla-Vela,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:22-CR-4-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Domingo
   Antonio Bonilla-Vela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bonilla-Vela has not filed a response.
   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10491     Document: 00516621038         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/24/2023

                                  No. 22-10491

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2