Court Opinion

ID: 8480612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:42:45.576515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.092223
License: Public Domain

*93Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric Childress appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Childress v. Pettiford, No. 4:08-cv-01001-SB, 2010 WL 412547 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.