Court Opinion

ID: 2849749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 22:14:46.36938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:49.191608
License: Public Domain

COURT
OF APPEALS
                                       SECOND
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                                   FORT
WORTH 
 
                                        NO.
2-05-406-CV
VINCENT
NEIL PINNER                                                          APPELLANT
 
                                                   V.
 
SNOWE
RAY PINNER                                                              APPELLEE
 
 
 
                                               ----------
            FROM THE 322nd
DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
                                               ----------
                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
                                               ----------
On July 21, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to
continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing
grounds for continuing the appeal.  We
have not received any response.

Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution
issue.
 
PER CURIAM               
 
 
PANEL D:   MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.
 
DELIVERED:  August 10, 2006

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.