Court Opinion

ID: 8449664
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:39:46.355594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.417155
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-AWA-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.