Court Opinion

ID: 6572117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:30:41.779798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:56.553958
License: Public Domain

Redfield, J.
dissenting, on the ground that the offer by the plaintiff to show an adverse possession was admissible, and that that fact, if proved, would have shown the deed not to-have been a “ good authentic” deed, but would have ren-. dered it wholly inoperative ; and that, as the defendant was bound by the award, not only to execute the deed but to. deliver possession, the terms “ good authentic deed” should be construed to imply, at the least, a deed, operative to con-, vey the title, which the defendant had at the time the award was made,