Court Opinion

ID: 9809741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:24:05.441764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:05:45.314288
License: Public Domain

Brown, J.,
concurring: It is admitted in plaintiff’s brief that this action is not brought for the purpose of asking the Court to regulate *39and fix the schedule of rates which the defendant company charges consumers, but for the sole purpose of compelling the defendant to continue to furnish plaintiffs current, and to do so without discrimination for like service to consumers similarly situated.
The defendant filed an answer to the complaint and then demurred ore terms, thereby admitting the truth of the facts stated in the complaint. Upon these facts I am of opinion that plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and that mandamus is the proper remedy. I concur in the judgment of the Court overruling the demurrer and affirming the judgment of Judge Shaw.