Court Opinion

ID: 9501930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 08:09:45.110521+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:27.345810
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 3, 2023.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                             NO. 14-22-00314-CR
                             NO. 14-22-00315-CR
                             NO. 14-22-00320-CR
                             NO. 14-22-00321-CR

                        DANIELLE POPE, Appellant

                                       V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                  On Appeal from the 174th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
         Trial Court Cause Nos. 1706082, 1706083, 1706085, 1706087

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Danielle Pope appeals his convictions for two charges of
aggravated assault of a public servant, aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon,
and possession of a firearm by a felon. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.02, 29.03,
& 46.04. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation
of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.
See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

      A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60
days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

      We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief
or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

      The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

                                             /s/ Jerry Zimmerer
                                             Justice

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                         2