Court Opinion

ID: 2923194
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:27:44.583846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:23.553628
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-389-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
 
                          IN RE: EUGENE X.
MERCIER   
__________________________________________________________________
 
 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for
Emergency Hearing 
                      on Petition for Writ of
Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
         Before Chief Justice Valdez and
Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                            Per Curiam
Memorandum Opinion[1]
 
Relator, Eugene X. Mercier, filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in the above cause on July 10, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition for writ of mandamus, its record and its
"clerk's record," is of the opinion that relator has not shown
himself entitled to the relief sought. 
Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Furthermore, relator's motion for emergency hearing on petition for
writ of mandamus filed on July 10, 2006, is also denied.
 
PER
CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion
delivered and 
filed this 11th day of
July, 2006.

[1]
See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing
opinions and memorandum opinions).