Court Opinion

ID: 9916787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-10 18:01:31.365371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:04.215141
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JAN 10 2024
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    23-50043

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No.
                                                3:13-cr-03954-BEN-1
 v.

MELVIN WARREN RIVERS, AKA Juice                 MEMORANDUM*
Lee,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of California
                   Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted January 8, 2024**
                               Pasadena, California

Before: CHRISTEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,*** Judge.

      Melvin Rivers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for early

termination of supervised release that followed his 2014 conviction for conspiracy

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      ***
             The Honorable Gary S. Katzmann, Judge for the United States Court
of International Trade, sitting by designation.
                                           1
to commit sex trafficking of a juvenile in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal as untimely.

      A defendant must file a notice of appeal within fourteen days of the order

being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). Rivers’s motion for early

termination of supervised release was denied on January 9, 2023. Rivers filed a

notice of appeal on February 28, 2023, which specified that he was appealing the

January 9 order denying the motion. Rivers’s notice of appeal was filed fifty days

after the order denying his motion, making it untimely. “Because the government

properly raised the untimeliness argument in the instant case . . . we are required to

dismiss [Rivers]’s appeal.” United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 942 (9th Cir.

2007).

      DISMISSED.

                                          2