Court Opinion

ID: 7216382
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 01:53:18.536376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:17:01.542858
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jose A. Luna appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Luna contends that the district court erred in applying an upward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4 for the use of a minor to commit a crime, without making any specific findings during the sentencing hearing as to its application. We review de novo, United States v. Houston, 217 F.3d 1204, 1206 (9th Cir.2000), and we conclude that the district court erred by not making specific findings resolving Luna’s objection to this upward adjust*229ment. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1) (requiring that the court “must rule on any unresolved objections to the presentence report ... [and] for each matter controverted, the court must make either a finding on the allegation or a determination that no finding is necessary”); Houston, 217 F.3d at 1207-09 (requiring “strict compliance ■with Rule 32”).
Accordingly, we vacate Luna’s sentence and remand for further fact finding and resentencing. United States v. Levya-Franco, 311 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (vacating and remanding for resentencing where the sentencing court failed to resolve a disputed issue as required under Rule 32(c)(1)).
VACATED and REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.