Court Opinion

ID: 9791734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:16:46.61261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:38.180348
License: Public Domain

HENRIOD, Justice
(concurring).
I concur, but wish to make the observation that plaintiff’s complaint is bottomed on a sales agency contract signed only by Mr. Hodson, not Mrs. Hodson. To attempt to bind Mrs. Hodson to such contract by referring to some other contract between the sellers and buyers, in my opinion, would be to compound an error that I believe we indulged in Ney v. Harrison, 5 Utah 2d 217, 299 P.2d 1114 (1956), where in a dissent, I unsuccessfully attempted to *118point out the distinction in the two different contracts as they related to the statute of .frauds. Since that case was referred to and discussed here, I take the liberty of at least suggesting that it might be opportune in the instant case to take a second look at that case with an eye for its renunciation.