Court Opinion

ID: 2945960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 03:57:51.218814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:22.611958
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

NO. WR-77,685-01

EX PARTE PERRY LEE WOOTEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 910847-A
IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus.  Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).  Applicant was convicted of theft by a public
servant and was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. 
	On April 12, 2012, the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law that were
based on a writ hearing and the record before the court.  The trial court recommended that relief be
granted on Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for his failure to request an
accomplice witness instruction.
	This Court does not believe that the trial court's recommendation is supported by the record.
There was substantial non-accomplice evidence presented that corroborated the accomplice evidence. 
Based on the entirety of the evidence and proceedings against him, Applicant does not show that had
the jury been given the accomplice witness instruction, there is a reasonable probability that the
result of the proceeding would have been different.  Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694
(1984); Davis v. State, 278 S.W.3d 346 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).  Based on this Court's independent
review of the entire record, we deny relief on all grounds presented in the application.

Filed: October 10, 2012
Do not publish