Court Opinion

ID: 4700651
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-02 00:00:33.321004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:27.775185
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40049      Document: 00515923226         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/01/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                            July 1, 2021
                                  No. 20-40049                            Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Damon Garnett,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:18-CR-85-2

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Damon Garnett has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Garnett has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40049     Document: 00515923226         Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/01/2021

                                  No. 20-40049

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2