Court Opinion

ID: 5712241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:55:40.667465+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:32.353480
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), dated June 6, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing *663evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The County Court properly assessed 15 points for the defendant’s history of alcohol abuse in light of the defendant’s admissions, as reflected in the presentence report, that he consumed a six-pack of beer before the commission of one of the offenses, had been drinking alcohol since he was 17 years of age, and had been able to consume up to three six-packs at a time (see People v Perser, 29 AD3d 767 [2006]). He also ignored the advice of his therapist to stop drinking (see People v Masters, 19 AD3d 387 [2005]). The defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of the existence of special circumstances to warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364, 364-365 [2006]; People v Vaughn, 26 AD3d 776, 776-777 [2006]). Miller, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.