Court Opinion

ID: 6690749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:37:32.914963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:06.184462
License: Public Domain

POELEY, J.
I concur in the. conclusion that the judgment entered on the 1st day of December, 1899, was void, and that the judgment appealed from ought to be reversed.
Note. — (Reported in 194 N. W. 649. See, Headnote (1), American Key-Numbered Digest, Judgment, Key-No. 519, 23 Cyc. 1065; (-2) Judgment, Key-No. 497(1), 23 Cyc. 1084 — 1924 Ann.; (3) 'judgment, Key-No. 22, 23 Cyc. 668; (4) Judgment, Key-No. 124, 23 Cyc. 760; (5) Judgment, Key-No. 497(1), 23 Cyc. 1087.
On expiration of period for revival of dormant judgment as bar to action thereon, see note in L. R. A. 1916E, 738.