Court Opinion

ID: 5943104
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 05:52:21.965648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:19.666807
License: Public Domain

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants, Walter Kidde & Company, Inc. (Kidde) and Mealane Corp. (Mealane), are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the negligence and strict products liability causes of action. Plaintiff’s losses are purely economic and are, therefore, not recoverable *1052under either tort theory (see, Schiavone Constr. Co. v Mayo Corp., 56 NY2d 667, revg 81 AD2d 221 on dissenting opn [Silverman, J.]; Arell’s Fine Jewelers v Honeywell, Inc., 170 AD2d 1013; Graham v Rockwell Inti. Corp., 135 AD2d 1128; Hemming v Certainteed Corp., 97 AD2d 976, appeal dismissed 61 NY2d 758). Even assuming that plaintiff's damages are attributable to the deterioration or breakdown of the fire suppression systems, "the injury is properly characterized as 'economic loss’ and plaintiff is relegated to contractual remedies” (Hemming v Certainteed Corp., supra; see also, Arell’s Fine Jewelers v Honeywell, Inc., supra; Richman v Albert, 127 AD2d 992, Iv denied 70 NY2d 745). Because plaintiff’s negligence and strict products liability causes of action must be dismissed, the cross claims asserted against Kidde and Mealane for contribution must also be dismissed since "[t]he existence of tort liability is a prerequisite to any claim for contribution” (Arell’s Fine Jewelers v Honeywell, Inc., supra, at 1014, citing Board of Educ. v Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley, 71 NY2d 21, 27-28). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.