Court Opinion

ID: 4708309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-02 07:21:46.433649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:49.634537
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                           OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-92,725-02

                         EX PARTE JOHN MICHAEL LYDY, Applicant

                   ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 20277-A IN THE 369TH DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM CHEROKEE COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and

sentenced to life imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lydy v.

State, No. 12-19-00021-CR (Tex. App. — Tyler Oct. 31, 2019) (not designated for publication).

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends, among other things,1 that he received ineffective assistance of trial

counsel and that he was denied his opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary review as a

       1
           This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
                                                                                                      2

result of appellate counsel’s failure to adequately notify him that if he wished to pursue discretionary

review, he would have to do so pro se.

       Applicant alleges that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to file or argue a motion

to suppress evidence on the basis of an unlawful search and seizure, and failed to present available

evidence during the punishment phase of trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle

him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims.

       Applicant also alleges that appellate counsel was aware that Applicant wanted to pursue a

petition for discretionary review, but failed to advise him that if he wanted to do so, he would have

to file the petition pro se, or of the deadlines and filing procedures for doing so. The appellate

docket reflects that appellate counsel filed a motion to extend the deadline for filing a petition for

discretionary review, but it is not clear whether he advised Applicant of the extended deadline, or

of how or where to file a pro se petition. The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claims.

       In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings
                                                                                                       3

as to whether appellate counsel timely advised Applicant that had a right to file a pro se petition for

discretionary review, and whether Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary

review but for appellate counsel's alleged deficient performance. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: July 28, 2021
Do not publish