Court Opinion

ID: 708122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:18:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:52.239443
License: Public Domain

70 F.3d 637
315 U.S.App.D.C. 76, 76 A.F.T.R.2d95-7124, 95-2 USTC  P 50,592
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.William A. CARNAHAN, Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee.
No. 94-1682.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 13, 1995.

Before:  BUCKLEY, GINSBURG and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

1
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs of counsel.  The court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the case does not call for further opinion.  See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b).

2
It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision from which this appeal has been taken be AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in the Tax Court's memorandum opinion of April 18, 1994.

3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.  See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(2).  This instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party at any time to move for expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.