Court Opinion

ID: 9963216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-24 19:03:53.332649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:43.022121
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                          Electronically Filed
                                          Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                          CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                          24-APR-2024
                                          07:57 AM
                                          Dkt. 184 SO

                       NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

              IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                     OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

                  ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION,
         an Ontario Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
      L & E RANCH LLC, a Hawaiʻi limited liability company,
            Defendant-Appellant, and HUGH JOHN COFLIN;
                   JANET DAWN STEPHENSON COFLIN;
      THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, a New York Corporation;
 DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAIʻI; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
        NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; TERRY LYNNE OHARA MOSELEY;
     ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KAI MALU AT WAILEA;
   ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF WAILEA FAIRWAY VILLAS;
         ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MAKENA SURF;
               DEAN S. ARASHIRO; MARGARET C. GARCIA;
MARGARET C. GARCIA, DDS, INC.; DEAN S. ARASHIRO, DDS, MS, LTD.;
         MAUI MIAMI AUMAKA PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                     Defendants-Appellees, and
     JOHN DOES 2-50; JANE DOES 2-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 2-50;
           DOE CORPORATIONS 2-50; DOE ENTITIES 2-50 and
             DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants.

      APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
                    (CIVIL NO. 2CC161000470)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                      SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
 (By:    Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)

            Defendant-Appellant L&E Ranch LLC (L&E Ranch) appeals

from the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit's: 1        (1) November 2,

2018 Order Granting Motion for Order Approving Report of

Commissioner, Confirming Sale of Real Property at Public

Auction, Directing Distribution of Proceeds, and for Issuance of

a Writ of Possession Filed on August 2, 2018 (Order Confirming

Sale); (2) November 23, 2018 Judgment on Order Confirming Sale

(Judgment); and (3) February 5, 2019 denial of L&E Ranch's

Nonhearing Motion for Rehearing/Reconsideration.

            L&E Ranch raises two points of error, contending the

circuit court abused its discretion when it confirmed the

foreclosure auction sale of two of its real properties

(together, Ranch Property) to Plaintiff-Appellee Romspen

Investment Corporation (Romspen) because:          (1) the bid price

from Romspen was so low that it shocks the conscience; and

(2) the circuit court did not hold an evidentiary hearing to

determine the fair market value of the Ranch Property.

            Upon careful review of the record and the briefs

submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to

     1   The Honorable Rhonda I.L. Loo presided.

                                      2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

the issues raised and the arguments advanced, we resolve the

points of error 2 as discussed below, and affirm.

            (1) L&E Ranch contends the bid price of $15,300,000.00

shocks the conscience because the Ranch Property was appraised

at $34 million in 2014 and $48 million in 2017, and it says it

received purchase offers for $22 million, $31 million, and

$32 million for the Ranch Property from other parties.

            A mortgagee is not required to obtain fair market

value when foreclosing on real property.          See Hungate v. Law

Off. of David B. Rosen, 139 Hawaiʻi 394, 408-09, 391 P.3d 1, 15-

16 (2017) (discussing nonjudicial foreclosures and recognizing

that foreclosure sales commonly fail to produce fair market

value bids), abrogated on other grounds by State ex rel. Shikada

v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 152 Hawaiʻi 418, 446, 526 P.3d 395,

423 (2023); see also Wodehouse v. Hawaiian Tr. Co., 32 Haw. 835,

852 (Haw. Terr. 1933) (stating that courts may refuse to confirm

a foreclosure bid that is "grossly inadequate") (emphasis

added).

            During a related federal bankruptcy proceeding, the

Bankruptcy Court reviewed the offers (including the $31 million

offer) L&E Ranch received prior to the hearing on the motion to

confirm sale and noted "none of these offers is a firm, binding

      2  We do not address arguments not raised as a point of error.   See
Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 28(b)(4).

                                      3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

commitment."   In lifting a stay of the foreclosure proceedings

in this case, the Bankruptcy Court ordered that the sale

confirmation hearing could not be held prior to September 4,

2018, noting if L&E Ranch "can't bring one of these transactions

together in that period of time, then it's not going to happen."

L&E Ranch does not assert it had a buyer at the time of the sale

confirmation hearing held September 6, 2018.

          Moreover, there was other evidence of the Ranch

Property's value.   The Commissioner's Report stated "public

records indicate that the 'market value' for Parcel First is

$8,538[,]900.00, the 'agricultural land value' for Parcel First

is $87,100.00 and the tax assessed value (2018) for Parcel First

is $87,100.00."   The Commissioner's Report also stated "public

records indicate that the 'market value' for Parcel Second is

$6,723,300.00, the 'agricultural land value' for Parcel Second

is $150,200.00 and the tax assessed value (2018) for Parcel

[Second] is $150,200.00"    In sum, according to the

Commissioner's Report, the market value for the Ranch Property

totaled $15,262,200.00.    No objections to the Commissioner's

Report were filed, and the circuit court "ratified, approved and

confirmed" the Commissioner's Report.

          When considering L&E Ranch's inability to find a buyer

(even at $22 million) and public records indicating the 2018

                                  4
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

"market value" was $15,262,200.00, we cannot say that the

$15,300,000.00 sales price shocks the conscience.    The circuit

court therefore did not abuse its discretion when confirming the

foreclosure sale.

            (2)   L&E Ranch contends the circuit court abused its

discretion "by refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing to

determine the true value of the subject property, allowing

Romspen to foreclose on additional collateral[.]"

            In HawaiiUSA Federal Credit Union v. Monalim, the

Hawai‘i Supreme Court adopted a new rule that a deficiency

judgment debtor may request a hearing to determine the fair

market value of the foreclosed property as of the date of the

foreclosure sale.    147 Hawai‘i 33, 36, 47-49, 464 P.3d 821, 824,

835-37 (2020).    The deficiency judgment is to be determined by

subtracting the greater of the fair market value or confirmed

bid price of the property from amounts owed by the debtor.      Id.

at 46-49, 464 P.3d at 834-37.    This new rule, however, applied

prospectively and "applie[d] only to foreclosure cases in which

a deficiency judgment is first entered after the date of this

opinion."    Id. at 54, 464 P.3d at 842.

            As L&E Ranch recognized in its opening brief, Hawai‘i

precedent when the circuit court confirmed the sale did not

require a fair market value determination hearing and, thus, we

                                   5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

conclude the circuit court did not disregard rules or principles

of law by omitting one here.        Notwithstanding Romspen's argument

to the contrary, the circuit court's Order Confirming Sale did

not establish a deficiency judgment or determine a "formula" for

determining a deficiency amount. 3

            Based on the foregoing, we affirm the circuit court's

(1) November 2, 2018 Order Confirming Sale; (2) November 23,

2018 Judgment; and (3) February 5, 2019 denial of L&E Ranch's

motion for reconsideration.

            DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai‘i, April 24, 2024.

On the briefs:                            /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
                                          Acting Chief Judge
Frederick J. Arensmeyer,
for Defendant-Appellant.                  /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                          Associate Judge
D. Scott MacKinnon,
Marguerite S.N. Fujie,                    /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
(McCorriston Miller Mukai                 Associate Judge
MacKinnon)
for Plaintiff-Appellee.

      3  We reject Romspen's argument that the circuit court's July 25, 2017
order precludes a fair value hearing in conjunction with a determination of a
deficiency judgment.

                                      6