Court Opinion

ID: 2942351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 23:31:22.588209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:24.399056
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                         NO. AP-76,112

                EX PARTE MICHAEL JOSEPH BENNETT, Applicant

    ON AN ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
           CAUSE NO. 43,922-C IN THE 89th DISTRICT COURT
                     FROM WICHITA COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                         OPINION

       The Applicant has filed an original application for writ of habeas corpus with this Court

seeking relief in the form of an out-of-time petition for discretionary review.1 The Applicant filed

a pre-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus with the district court seeking relief from

being placed in double jeopardy by a re-trial in this cause. The trial court denied relief, and the

       1
          Article 1, Section 12 of the Texas Constitution states that, “The Writ of habeas corpus is
a writ of right, and shall never be suspended. The Legislature shall enact laws to render the
remedy speedy and effectual.” The authority of the Court of Criminal Appeals to grant and issue
original writs of habeas corpus is set out in the Texas Constitution Article 5, subsection (c). This
authority is also set out in Article 4.04(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
                                                                                                     2

Applicant appealed the trial court’s ruling to the Second Court of Appeals. The Second Court of

Appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial of Applicant’s pre-conviction application for writ of habeas

corpus. Ex parte Bennett, 245 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 2008, pet. dism’d).

       Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed.

       Appellate counsel filed an affidavit which is included in the record before this Court. Based

on that affidavit, we find that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction

had been affirmed, and that relief should be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time

petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in Cause No. 02-

07-00104-CR that affirmed the trial court’s denial of his pre-conviction writ in Case No. 43,922-C

from the 89th Judicial District Court of Wichita County. Applicant shall file his petition for

discretionary review with the Second Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: MARCH 11, 2009
Do not publish