Court Opinion

ID: 3898338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:29:50.283033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:56:45.244949
License: Public Domain

Honorable F. Duncan Thomas District Attorney P.O. Box 441 Greenville, Texas 75401
Re: Whether certain fees may be charged by a district clerk
Dear Mr. Thomas:
You ask about the fees a district clerk may charge in connection with a lawsuit filed in district court. At the time a suit is filed in district court a fee of $75.00 is due and payable. Gov't Code § 51.317(b)(1) (formerly V.T.C.S. art. 3927, § 1; amended by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 239, at 2038); Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 480, at 3932 (bill adopting Gov't Code). A catchall provision authorizes district clerks to charge reasonable fees for the performance of duties for which the legislature has set no fee. Gov't Code § 51.319(5) (formerly V.T.C.S. art. 3928, § 5). You ask whether the catchall provision authorizes a district clerk to charge, in addition to the initial $75.00 filing fee, reasonable fees for filing each order and judgment in a suit. You inform us that the Office of Court Administration takes the position that the initial $75 fee covers all clerical services in a suit except those for which additional fees are expressly provided. We think that the Office of Court Administration has interpreted the statute correctly.
We base our conclusion on the structure and language of the applicable fee statutes. Gov't Code §§ 51.317-51.319. The legislature has provided for fees to be charged by the clerk at the time a suit is filed in district court. Gov't Code §51.317(b)(1). The legislature has also set fees to be charged for the performance of certain services by a district clerk at the time of performance or request for performance and has provided that any such fee is "in addition to a fee under Section 51.317." Gov't Code § 51.318(a). That language implies that other duties performed by a district clerk in connection with a lawsuit are covered by the initial fee.
A 1980 case supports our reading of section 51.317(b)(1). Rodeheaver v. Aldridge, 601 S.W.2d 51 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.). In Rodeheaver the court dealt with the following language:
  For each adverse action or contest, other than the filing of a claim against an estate, in a cause or docket in a probate court, a fee to be due and payable and to be paid by the party or parties starting or initiating such adverse action or contest, but excluding other items listed in Paragraphs A, B, C, and D of this Section 1, of $25.00.
V.T.C.S. art. 3930(b), § 1B(1)(c). The court concluded that the $25 fee covered various duties performed by the county clerk during the course of the suit:
  A reading of Article 3930(b) shows that the $25.00 fee which the county clerk is to collect for each filed adverse action or contest covers not only the clerk's services for the initial filing of the action but also many other services which will accrue during the processing of the suit. Thus, the statutory fee is, in effect, an advance payment for the cost of services which have not been rendered at the time the fee is collected.
Rodeheaver, 601 S.W.2d at 54. We think section 51.317(b)(1) must be read in the same way.
Because the legislature has set a $75 fee1 that covers the filing of orders and payments in a suit, the catchall provision is inapplicable to such filings since it applies only when the legislature has not set a fee to cover the clerk's performance of a duty.
 SUMMARY
The initial fee of $75.00 for filing a suit in district court covers the services performed by the district clerk during the course of the suit except for the service for which a fee is expressly provided. Gov't Code § 51.317.
Very truly yours,
  Jim Mattox Attorney General of Texas
Jack Hightower
First Assistant Attorney General
  Mary Keller Executive Assistant Attorney General
  Robert Gray Special Assistant Attorney General
  Rick Gilpin Chairman, Opinion Committee
  Prepared by Sarah Woelk Assistant Attorney General
1 The Sixty-ninth Legislature amended article 3927 to increase the initial filing fee for a suit in district court from $25.00 to $75.00. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 239 at 2038. The text of the Government Code, which was adopted in the same legislative session, states that the initial filing fee is $25.00. Gov't Code § 51.317(b)(1), Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 480, at 3932. The same bill that enacted the Government Code repealed article 3927. Id. at 4088. The increase in the filing fee is effective, nonetheless, because the repeal of a statute by a code does not affect an amendment of the statute by the same legislature that enacted the code. V.T.C.S. art. 5429b-2, § 3.11(c). And the codification was not intended to effect a substantive change in the law. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 480, § 27, at 4090.