Court Opinion

ID: 9374306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-22 19:00:45.926811+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:46.419778
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11915    Document: 26-1     Date Filed: 02/22/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11915
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       EDDIE D. STARKS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cr-00072-MW-MAF-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11915      Document: 26-1     Date Filed: 02/22/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-11915

       Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Richard Smith, appointed counsel for Eddie Starks in this di-
       rect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
       sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
       California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
       tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
       the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
       tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED.