Court Opinion

ID: 3568168
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:17:41.693806+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:03.555147
License: Public Domain

[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 265 
[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 266 
[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 267 
The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Egan in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.
For reversal: None. *Page 268