Court Opinion

ID: 5366655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 07:50:34.878353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:57.590141
License: Public Domain

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The Special Term was vested with discretion to deny *878plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue his action on payment of costs. (See Carleton v. Darcy, 75 N. Y. 375; Matter of Lasak, 131 id. 624.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to discontinue the action upon payment of taxable costs to date.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [171 Misc. 1001.]