Court Opinion

ID: 988339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:51:02.449788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:26.204992
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 95-6833

WILLIAM HENRY FIELDS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

         versus

WARDEN OF THE STAUNTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-94-825-R)

Submitted:   January 11, 1996            Decided:   January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Henry Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap-

peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Fields v. Warden, Staunton Correctional Ctr., No. CA-94-825-R (W.D.
Va. Apr. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2