Court Opinion

ID: 9682035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 08:03:58.803259+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:37.148281
License: Public Domain

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge
(dissenting in part).
To that portion of the majority opinion which overrules Spencer v. State, the authority relied upon by the appellant, I respectfully dissent.
If, as the majority holds, the evidence does not show an unlawful retention of appellant’s truck by Mr. Hughes the Spencer *441case is not applicable and need not be overruled. On the other hand, if the facts here are such as to call for reversal under the majority opinion in Spencer v. State the conviction for seriously threatening to take the life or inflict serious bodily injury on Mr. Hughes should be reversed.