Court Opinion

ID: 9364130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-18 16:03:13.62833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:35.957427
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                       Opinion filed January 18, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D21-2252
                      Lower Tribunal No. 15-124 SP
                          ________________

            United Automobile Insurance Company,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                 Gables Insurance Recovery, Inc.,
                     a/a/o Roberto Sanchez,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G.
Barket, Judge.

     Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

     The Billbrough Firm, and G. Bart Billbrough, for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Fayad v. Univ. of Miami, 307 So. 3d 114, 118 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2020) (“A trial court’s denial of a motion to amend a complaint is

generally an abuse of discretion unless (1) the privilege to amend has been

abused, (2) the amendment would prejudice the opposing party, or (3) the

amendment would be futile.”); Grove Isle Ass’n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs.,

LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081, 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (same); see also Bldg. B1,

LLC v. Component Repair Servs., Inc., 224 So. 3d 785, 789 (Fla. 3d DCA

2017) (recognizing that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190’s liberal

amendment policy diminishes as a case progresses to trial and, based on

the prejudice to the opposing party, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial

court’s decision given the lateness of the request to amend).

                                       2