Court Opinion

ID: 4390966
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-25 18:00:31.926217+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:42.508619
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-14543   Date Filed: 04/25/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-14543
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00036-MSS-SPF-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

WILLIAM PATRICK KING,
a.k.a. Billy King,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 25, 2019)

Before MARCUS, ROSNEBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-14543    Date Filed: 04/25/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for William King in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and King’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2