Court Opinion

ID: 2956910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 01:44:07.502397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:13.373282
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-10-00296-CV

                   Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                  Public Citizen, Inc., Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
       NO. D-1-GN-09-003426, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

               Appellee Public Citizen, Inc., as part of its motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal

as moot, has asked in the alternative that this Court remand for the limited purpose of allowing

Public Citizen to voluntarily dismiss its claims against appellant Texas Commission on

Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in the trial court. TCEQ opposes the motion. However, it is not

apparent that Public Citizen needs permission from this Court to dismiss its own case. Under the

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a]t any time before the plaintiff has introduced all of his evidence

other than rebuttal evidence, the plaintiff may dismiss a case, or take a non-suit, which shall be

entered in the minutes.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 162. Rule 162 is applicable here because this is an

interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of TCEQ’s plea to the jurisdiction. See University

of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2006) (per
curiam). Because the trial court generally does not have discretion to refuse to dismiss a suit, Public

Citizen has the absolute right to dismiss its claims. See CTL/Thompson, LLC v. Starwood

Homeowner’s Ass’n, 390 S.W.3d 299, 299 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam).1

                Nevertheless, because Public Citizen has sought permission from this Court to

dismiss its suit below, we abate this appeal for thirty days for the sole purpose of allowing Public

Citizen to dismiss its claims against TCEQ in the trial court. Public Citizen shall file in this Court

proof of its dismissal or nonsuit on or before August 15, 2013. If such proof is not filed in this Court

by that date, this appeal will be reinstated. Having decided to abate this appeal, we do not reach

Public Citizen’s motion to dismiss at this time. Tex. R. Civ. P. 47.1.

Before Justices Rose, Goodwin, and Field

Abated

Filed: July 16, 2013

         1
          Although a nonsuit may not prejudice the rights of an adverse party to be heard on its
pending claims, TCEQ’s plea to the jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity is not a claim for
affirmative relief that survives nonsuit. See CTL/Thompson, LLC v. Starwood Homeowner’s Ass’n,
390 S.W.3d 299, 300–01 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam); University of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston
v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2006) (per curiam).

                                                   2