Court Opinion

ID: 2234213
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:45:23.067838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:33.191798
License: Public Domain

777 N.W.2d 238 (2010)
Maria (Dunahoo) OLLIKKALA, Relator,
v.
RSI, INC., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, L.L.C., Respondents.
No. A09-1638.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 29, 2010.
David R. Vail, Soderberg & Vail, L.L.C., Minneapolis, MN, for relator.
Timothy P. Jung, Peter L. Gregory, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 11, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Lorie S. Gildea
Associate Justice
*239