Court Opinion

ID: 2961509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:44:12.862587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:59.416510
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          October 22, 1992      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________          No. 92-1505                                    JOHN R. LANE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                                 ARGEO PAUL CELLUCCI,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ___________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                      [Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                              Torruella, Circuit Judge,                                         _____________                      Brown* and Bownes, Senior Circuit Judges.                                         _____________________                                 ____________________                Matthew Cobb for appellant.                ____________                Jon  Laramore,  Assistant   Attorney  General,   Government                _____________          Bureau,  with whom  Scott Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  was on                              _________________          brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                                        ____________________          *  Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.                    Per Curiam.   Upon full  review of the  record in  this                    __________          case, and having considered  the briefs and oral argument  of the          parties,  the decision  of  the district  court  is affirmed  for          substantially the same  reasons as  are stated  in said  opinion.          See Lane v. Cellucci, No. 91-12704 (D. Mass. March 11, 1992).          ___ ____    ________                    Affirmed.  Costs to appellee.                    ________                                         -2-