Court Opinion

ID: 4206250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-09-26 16:13:11.90846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:47.008696
License: Public Domain

People v Thames (2017 NY Slip Op 06623)

People v Thames

2017 NY Slip Op 06623

Decided on September 26, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 26, 2017

Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gesmer, JJ.

4503 4613/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vTony Thames, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered April 22, 2015,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.