Court Opinion

ID: 9915036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-04 15:00:49.023957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:16:55.826598
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13705   Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 01/04/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-13705
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      WILLIAM JACKSON,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      DORIS CHAPPELL JACKSON,

                                                   Defendant-Appellee.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-04174-ELR
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13705      Document: 7-1     Date Filed: 01/04/2024      Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-13705

      Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. William Jackson, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district
      court’s order remanding to state court a divorce action. We lack
      jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on
      the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
      § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports &Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96
      (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Hu-
      mana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.