Court Opinion

ID: 9416933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:58:38.172744+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:55.230142
License: Public Domain

*84Mr. Justice CLIFFORD, with whom concurred' Mr. Justice SWAYNE,
dissenting:-
I dissent from the judgment of the court in this case, holding that this court should adhere to its former decision, as it appears that the State statute when the bonds in that ease' were issued had not been construed by the State court.
Where the construction of a State statute is involved in a case presented here for decision, and it appears that the statute in question has not been construed by the State court, I hold that it is the duty of this court to ascertain and determine what is its true construction, and that this court, under such circumstances, will not reversé its decision in the same or a subsequent case, even though the State court may afterwards give a different construction to the same statute.