Court Opinion

ID: 6952958
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:34:28.288474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:08.793285
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Lawrence delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an action brought against a constable, to recover three times the value of a cow, levied on and sold by him under an execution against the plaintiff. The case was tried by the court and judgment given for the plaintiff. We are of opinion that, in this judgment, the court erred. The plaintiff claimed the cow as exempt, but did not offer to turn out other property. It is in proof that he owned another cow and calf, two horses and a wagon, and had them in his possession. As held by this court in Cook v. Scott, 1 Gilm. 333, if he desired to claim the cow under the statute, he should have offered to turn out other property. It is said this other property was subject to a chattel mortgage, and it would have been, therefore, improper in him to have offered it to the officer. The mortgage was not produced, and we are not informed what was its amount, or what were its conditions, or whether it was so acknowledged and recorded as to make it a lien paramount to the execution. But, admitting it was, the officer, when he levied on the cow, saw the horses and wagon in plaintiff’s possession, and when the latter claimed the cow as exempt, he should have informed the constable of the mortgage, and thus have given him the opportunity of ascertain- . ing whether the lien of the mortgage was paramount to that of his execution. The constable would then have been able to act advisedly. If he had ascertained that the horses and wagon were really subject to a paramount lien, and that the plaintiff could not properly turn them out on the execution, he would probably have surrendered the cow to the claim of ' the plaintiff As the plaintiff owned other property, though }:;sjbje"ot..to„a"lien, and as the officer saw this property in his possession and was not informed of the lien, he committed no ■ liwrong in -refusing to surrender the cow on the naked demand . ,.of .the ¡plaintiff, made without an offer to turn out other pro•*'‘:'perty,■'br.Ian explanation of the reason why such offer was hot.-made. On this record, the judgment should have been for the defendant. Judgment revised.