Court Opinion

ID: 680247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:34:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:05.296053
License: Public Domain

37 F.3d 1493NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gerald Davis FULLER, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Richard LANHAM, Sr.;  Kenneth E. Taylor;  John Peterson;J.M. Dean;  R. Richie;  Brian Irwin;  LarryStewart;  Doris Wyatt, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7030.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Jan. 19, 1994.Decided:  Oct. 12, 1994.

Gerald Davis Fuller, appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Fuller v. Lanham, No. CA-93-102-WN (D. Md. Sept. 17, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED