Court Opinion

ID: 2633024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-11-01 21:03:55.778748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:31.111463
License: Public Domain

184 P.3d 1163 (2008)
219 Or. App. 655
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Abraham PALFENIER, Defendant-Appellant.
C052447CR; A133430.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted April 11, 2008.
Decided May 7, 2008.
Laura Graser argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, and one count of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160. On appeal, he challenges his convictions and his sentence. We reject without discussion defendant's challenges to his convictions. On the sexual abuse convictions, defendant received mandatory minimum sentences of 100 months for each conviction, ORS 137.700(2)(a)(P), and the court ordered that those sentences be served partially consecutively to one another, over defendant's objection that the imposition of consecutive sentences required factfinding by the jury. The court imposed concurrent sentences on the remaining convictions. On appeal, defendant argues that the court erred in imposing consecutive sentences based on judicial factfinding. The state acknowledges that this issue is controlled by State v. Ice, 343 Or. 248, 260, 170 P.3d 1049 (2007), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 1657, 170 L. Ed. 2d 353 (2008). We agree.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.