Court Opinion

ID: 542553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:41.421465
License: Public Domain

904 F.2d 699Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Kevin Mark BOWLES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.T.N. NANCE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the City ofRichmond;  Attorney General of the Commonwealth ofVirginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 7, 1990.Decided:  May 22, 1990.Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Aug. 14, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Richard L. Williams, District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-844-R).
Kevin Mark Bowles, appellant pro se.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Kevin Mark Bowles seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Bowles v. Nance, C/A No. 88-844-R (E.D.Va. July 31, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED