Court Opinion

ID: 4674593
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-05 18:00:27.976536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:33.035353
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10214     Document: 00515807530         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/05/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                     April 5, 2021
                                  No. 20-10214
                                                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                      Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Christian Mondragon-Torres,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:17-CR-608-2

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christian
   Mondragon-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mondragon-Torres has not filed a

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10214     Document: 00515807530         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/05/2021

                                  No. 20-10214

   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.

                                       2