Court Opinion

ID: 8572460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 15:12:42.593634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:53:55.947112
License: Public Domain

Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
Charged with the larceny of $20.00 from a fellow officer, the accused entered a plea of guilty. The meaning and effect of the plea were explained to him by the law officer, but. he persisted in it. He was found guilty as charged and sentenced to be dismissed from the service.
On this appeal, the accused contends he was deprived of his right to appeal from a ruling of the convening authority declaring unavailable individual military counsel requested by the accused for the Article 32 investigation. See Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraphs 34c, 486. No motion for appropriate relief was made at the trial, and it nowhere appears that the accused was prejudiced at the trial by the improper action of the convening authority. Under the circumstances, there is no justification for setting aside the conviction. United States v Mickel, 9 USCMA 324, 26 CMR 104; United States v Rehorn, 9 USCMA 487, 26 CMR 267.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Judge LatimeR concurs.