Court Opinion

ID: 8453737
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:41:38.173238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.952301
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Janice Marie Carter appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying her motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not alter Carter’s Guidelines range. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010). We also conclude that the district court correctly determined that it lacked authority to entertain Carter’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.