Court Opinion

ID: 5558991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:46:40.471048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:24.851648
License: Public Domain

Jackson, Justice.
The plea of the defendant in this case, which we think controls it, is an arbitration and award made by arbitrators and an umpire, duly appointed by the parties. By that award the land sued for was set apart to the defendant, and the title vested in him.
The award is not impeached on any ground of fraud or illegal conduct of the arbitrators, but solely on the ground *164that the United States district court, which made the award its judgment had no jurisdiction of the case. We think it had jurisdiction thereof; but even if it had none, the award would be good under our Code, §2883, which declares that “ parties disagreeing as to their rights or liabilities may submit the matter to third persons to decide, and the award made by such arbitrators is binding on the persons submitting.” These parties disagreed as to their rights, and submitted the matter to arbitrators, who decided between them.
It bound them to abide the decision of the arbitrators without regard to any rule of any court submitting the matter or authorizing it, or the subsequent judgment of any court thereon, unless the award be attacked for fraud in the arbitrators or in the party, or there is a palpable mistake of law, or reference of the matter to chance or lot, none of which is pretended in this case. See Code, §§2890, 2892, 2893, 4225, 4226, 4227 et seq. All was done in this case that these provisions require, and the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.