Court Opinion

ID: 40201
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:41:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:21.149092
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 14, 2005

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-10361
                         Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN FELIPE GONZALEZ-AGUILAR, also known as Juan Felipe
Gonzalez Aguilar, also known as Juan Gonzalez Cortez, also
known as Francisco Cortez Gonzalez, also known as Diego
Rafael Gonzalez,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                           --------------------
               Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 4:04-CR-149-ALL
                           --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Felipe

Gonzalez-Aguilar raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense.        The

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 05-10361
                               -2-

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.