Court Opinion

ID: 663107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:21:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:43.080672
License: Public Domain

16 F.3d 704
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Edward M. CZUPRYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-1079.
United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1994.

Before:  MERRITT, Chief Judge;  KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
Prior report:  8 F.3d 1113.

2
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc.  Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

3
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

4
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

5
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.