Court Opinion

ID: 9601373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:42:49.256712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:53:43.769367
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
*589Robert Neil Gygi and Keane, Haessler, Bauman and Harper, Portland, for the petition.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Lusk, Justices.
GOODWIN, J.
 In a petition for rehearing the taxpayers have objected to our citation of Alsos v. Kendall et al, 111 Or 359, 366, 227 P 286 (1924) for dictum to the effect that Oregon Constitution, Art I, § 20, does not purport to deal with the rights of nonresidents. The statement was not necessary to the decision in Alsos v. Kendall, and it is not necessary to the decision in the case at bar. The statement admits of a construction that is broader than we intended to give to it, and it should be withdrawn. In all other respect we adhere to our former opinion.
Rehearing denied.