Court Opinion

ID: 9669943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:11:25.467283+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:01.293157
License: Public Domain

TEIGEN, Judge.
I concur for the reason that the trial court did not, in my opinion, abuse its discretion. I am still of the opinion that a determination by the trial court of the right of visitation, alimony, and support payments are not “findings of fact subject to test by the “clearly erroneous rule” under Rule 52(a) N.D.R.Civ.P. See my special concurrence in Silseth v. Levang, N.D., 214 N.W.2d 361-365.
KNUDSEN, Judge.
I agree with the special concurrence of Judge Teigen.