Court Opinion

ID: 5419474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:25:06.270986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:10.371103
License: Public Domain

Delehanty, J.
The action was brought to take and state an account. On the trial the complaint was dismissed on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter. The costs were taxed at sixty-five dollars based on the amount set forth in the summons. That a court has the power to award' costs where the action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction is beyond question. (Day v. Sun Insurance Office, 40 App. Div. 305; affd., on opinion below, 167 N. Y. 543; Seacoast Trust Co. v. Mugman, 184 App. Div. 895.)
A dismissal of the case at the trial for lack of jurisdiction was a trial within the purview of subdivision 7 of section 164 of the New York City Municipal Court Code and the statutory costs therein provided followed as matter of course. The court below, therefore, erred in striking out the costs as fixed in the judgment.
The order should be reversed and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and motion denied.
All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.