Court Opinion

ID: 6600391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:07:08.510932+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:57:59.680039
License: Public Domain

Dixon, C. J.
On argument of demurrer, judgment will he against the party whose first pleading is bad in substance. The complaint in this case is defective in not showing that the plaintiff had a right to redeem the land from taxes at the time it is alleged that he did so. The complaint is under chapter 22, Laws of-1859, upon a tax deed executed December 31, 1867, to one H. Eugene Eastman, in pursuance of a sale of the land recited to have been made in the year 1840. The plaintiff claims title under Eastman, by deed dated October 16, 1868. The redemption of the land from tax sales, for which the plaintiff claims a lien, is charged to have been made by him in 1863. The complaint fails to show, therefore, that the plaintiff had, at the time of such alleged redemption, any interest in or lien upon the land which would authorize him to redeem; and it consequently appears that the certificates for the same tax sales in the hands of the defendant and owned by him, as averred in that part of the answer demurred to, are valid as against the lien or claim of the plaintiff with respect thereto set up in the complaint. With no title to or interest in the land at the time, the plaintiff could not redeem, so as to deprive the defendant of his lien or interest acquired by virtue of the certificates.
By the Court. — Order affirmed.