Court Opinion

ID: 2899228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 00:00:25.469121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:30.528057
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-09-0030-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL B

                                   JUNE 3, 2009
                          ______________________________

                                 JASON EARLE WELLS,

                                                                Appellant

                                             v.

                                 THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                Appellee

                        _________________________________

           FROM THE 26th DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY;

          NO. 05-1399-K26; HON. BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, PRESIDING
                      _______________________________

                           ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                         _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

        Jason Earle Wells (appellant) appeals from his conviction for burglary of a

habitation. He filed his notice of appeal on October 27, 2008. The reporter’s record was

filed on February 2, 2009, and the clerk’s record on March 4, 2009. Appellant’s brief was

due on April 3, 2009. Neither a brief nor a motion for extension was filed by that date,

however. On April 13, 2009, the court sent a letter to appellant notifying him that the brief
was overdue and that it or response was due on April 23, 2009. On April 20, 2009,

appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief. It was granted, and the

deadline was extended to May 4, 2009. On May 11, 2009, this Court received appellant’s

second motion for extension of time and extended the deadline to May 26, 2009. At that

time we also told him that if the brief was not filed by that date, the appeal would be abated.

To date, no brief has been filed.

       Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 26th District Court

(trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause

notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the

following:

       1.     whether appellant is indigent;

       2.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

       3.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel
              due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief. See
              Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L.
              Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled
              to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right
              and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
              submitting an appellate brief).

       We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we

further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The

name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,

if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings

                                               2
of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be

developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions

of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s

record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before July 3, 2009. Should additional

time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before July

3, 2009.

       It is so ordered.

                                                 Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                             3