Court Opinion

ID: 3962433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:22:38.201526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:47.171726
License: Public Domain

There are two applications for writs of error in this case — one by the appellant in the Court of Civil Appeals, and the other by two of the appellees.
The suit was brought by the wife, the father and the mother of A.G. Lee to recover of the defendant cement and lime company for injuries resulting in his death. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdice and judgment in favor of the wife, Pearl Lee, for $2500, and in favor of the father, A.G. Lee, and the mother, Mary Lee, each for $500. *Page 237 
The Court of Civil Appeals first determined that the judgment as to Pearl Lee should be affirmed, but that as to A.G. Lee and Mary Lee it should be reversed and the cause remanded, unless they should remit the whole amount adjudged to them. Thereupon the attorneys for these two appellees filed a motion for a rehearing in which they prayed the court to reverse its ruling and to affirm the judgment as to them, and also requested the court, in case this should not be done, to render the judgment against them, to the end that they could have the ruling revised by this court. The Court of Civil Appeals thereupon granted the motion and rendered judgment that the parties last named take nothing by their suit.
We find no error in the proceedings pointed out in the application of the defendant company, and its application is therefore refused.
The application of A.G. Lee and Mary Lee is also refused, but for another reason. Having asked the court to render a judgment against them, they can not now complain that it is erroneous. We say this much merely for the purpose of having it understood that we do not pass upon the question decided by the Court of Civil Appeals adversely to the father and mother of the deceased — namely, whether there was any evidence to support a judgment in their favor.
Both applications are refused.
Applications refused.