Court Opinion

ID: 627573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:00:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:45.077710
License: Public Domain

1 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.George Lee SAUNDERS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 93-6455.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 16, 1993.Decided:  August 4, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-92-975)
George Lee Saunders, Petitioner Pro Se.
Oliver Lewis Norrell, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Respondent.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
George Lee Saunders seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Sec. 2254 (1988).1  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Saunders v. Murray, No. CA-92-975 (E.D. Va.  Apr. 19, 1993).2  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

1
 The court also denied Saunders's request to present new evidence, his motion for appointment of counsel, and his motion for trial transcripts

2
 We deny Saunders's motion for summary disposition