Court Opinion

ID: 9381173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-22 00:00:25.373635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:30.493554
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10724         Document: 00516684277             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/21/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10724
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                                March 21, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jose Pavo Martinez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:01-CR-229-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jose Pavo Martinez has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Martinez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10724     Document: 00516684277         Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/21/2023

                                  No. 22-10724

   Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2