Court Opinion

ID: 808577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-09-14 20:28:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:03.089793
License: Public Domain

FILED
                           NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              SEP 14 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-10354

              Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 4:10-cr-03315-DCB-
                                                 JJM-1
  v.

JOSE ROSAS-UZAGARRA, AKA Jose                    MEMORANDUM *
Jesus Rosas-Uzagarra,

              Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

       Jose Rosas-Uzagarra appeals his conviction by guilty plea and 51-month

sentence for attempted re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rosas-Uzagarra’s attorney

        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
        **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     11-10354