Court Opinion

ID: 1369928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:49:41.860854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:27.201442
License: Public Domain

310 S.W.3d 310 (2010)
Carl S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93517.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 18, 2010.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.
Prior report: 266 S.W.3d 343.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carl Sutherland (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).