Court Opinion

ID: 2691376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:03:23.336136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:40.760722
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 127 Ohio St.3d 1258, 2010-Ohio-6088.]

                            DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RIEK.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 127 Ohio St.3d 1258, 2010-Ohio-
                                           6088.]
   (No. 2009-2244 — Submitted November 29, 2010 — Decided December 6,
                                           2010.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT
                                   __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, F. Benjamin Riek III, Attorney
Registration No. 0022703, last known business address in Shaker Heights, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 12, 2010,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of 18 months with 12 months stayed on condition, finds that respondent
has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R.
V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the
practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 125 Ohio St.3d
46, 2010-Ohio-1556, 925 N.E.2d 980.
        BROWN,      C.J.,    and    PFEIFER,    LUNDBERG        STRATTON,      O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                               ______________________