Court Opinion

ID: 5164266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 03:17:56.515758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:46.548175
License: Public Domain

LUMPKIN, Vice
Presiding Judge, concurring in result.
I concur in the results reached by the Court based on stare decisis. However, I continue to interpret 22 O.S.1981, § 1230 as delineated in my dissent to Solis-Avila v. State, 830 P.2d 191, 63 OBJ 1138, 1139 (Okl.Cr.1992). See also Kay v. State, 668 *426P.2d 1150, 1152 (Okl.Cr.1983). Section 1230 only requires a finding by the judge that it is likely the property will be destroyed, moved or concealed based on the totality of the evidence presented, not a pleading to that effect.