Court Opinion

ID: 9647978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:57:46.068595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:55.094279
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Ground 6 of appellants’ motion reads:
“The Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the trial court which was based upon issues submitted in a divisible manner regarding the damages sustained by the appellee, which issues inquired of the damages sustained by the ap-pellee as a result of the actions of the four respective loan offices, whereas the proper issue was what was the total damages sustained by the appellee, as held by the Supreme Court of the State of Texas, in the case of Riley v. Industrial Finance Service Company, Tex.1957, 302 S.W.2d 652.”
Thus attempted to be raised for the first time is a point not heretofore presented in trial court or on appeal. Appellants have wholly failed up to this juncture to assert error with respect to the matter in question. Specific instances of such failures are: In second amended original answer; in exceptions to the charge (not made part of the record by appellants) ; in their amended motion for new trial; and lastly in.the brief of appellants filed in. this Court. They are therefore not entitled to now complain of manner of submission of the damage issues on motion for rehearing.
Said motion, upon consideration, is in all things overruled.