Court Opinion

ID: 4199540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-08-28 19:01:54.948656+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:58:04.674718
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 17-1531

BEVERLY DIGGS,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

ELAINE C. DUKE, Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-02378-PJM)

Submitted: August 24, 2017                                        Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Ann Koch, Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Beverly Diggs appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment

discrimination complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Diggs’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Diggs has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th

Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2