Court Opinion

ID: 9941691
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 19:01:45.017714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:57.593435
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10662         Document: 00517066929             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/16/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10662
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                               February 16, 2024
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Joel Calzada, Jr.,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-357-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit
   Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel Calzada, Jr.,
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calzada has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10662    Document: 00517066929         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/16/2024

                                 No. 23-10662

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2