Court Opinion

ID: 9864700
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 15:00:59.48704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:07.634262
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12546   Document: 3-1     Date Filed: 09/25/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-12546
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      JERMAINE TERRELL BOUIE,
                                                  Petitioner-Appellant,
      versus
      HARRY JAY ALTMAN,
      JENNIFER CROCKET,
      DR. OSCAR JACKSON, JR.,
      DETECTIVE TIM ROBERTS,
      JAMES E. HARDY, et al.,

                                               Respondents-Appellees.

                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12546      Document: 3-1       Date Filed: 09/25/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                       Opinion of the Court                   23-12546

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Georgia
                  D.C. Docket No. 7:23-cv-00001-WLS-TQL
                          ____________________

      Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Jermaine Bouie, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the
      district court’s June 1, 2023, order dismissing his amended motion
      for writ of mandamus and denying his amended motion for sum-
      mary judgment. The statutory time limit required him to file his
      notice of appeal on or before July 3, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a);
      Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). The notice of appeal,
      deemed filed on July 18, 2023, is therefore untimely, and we lack
      jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United States, 748
      F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d
      1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.