Court Opinion

ID: 992164
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:47:34.537185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:50.615785
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7511

PAUL LEE MARTIN,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DONALD GUILLORY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-95-713-R)

Submitted:   May 1, 1997                     Decided:   May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Lee Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. Martin v. Guillory, No. CA-95-713-R (W.D.
Va. Sept. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2