Court Opinion

ID: 999401
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:25:19.330229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:11.556541
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-6770

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

THOMAS M. SHELL,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-98-46, CA-99-1020-7-20)

Submitted:   August 5, 1999                 Decided:   August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas M. Shell, Appellant Pro Se.     Harold Watson Gowdy, III,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Thomas Shell seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Shell, Nos. CR-98-46; CA-99-

1020-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2