Court Opinion

ID: 9790150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:46:57.452574+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:26.557578
License: Public Domain

PHELPS, Justice.
I concur.
I am, of course, of the view that this court erred in holding § 23-1322, A.R.S. unconstitutional in Baldwin . v. Arizona Flame Restaurant, supra. But I am bound hy that decision, and inasmuch as the trial court based its decision in this case exclusively upon that section of the statute I .-am compelled to concur in this opinion. However, I do not yield my conviction that strangers to a business concern do not have the right to picket such business unless they are able to show that they have an interest therein affected adversely by the conduct ■of the employer, which interest also adversely affects the public or a considerable ■segment thereof, which when evaluated ■outweighs the interest of the employer. Had the trial court decided this case upon the latter ground, I would unhesitatingly dissent upon the record before us.