Court Opinion

ID: 6275472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 15:58:12.504922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:02.805057
License: Public Domain

Pee Cueiam,
This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why service of the subpoena in divorce should not be set aside. Such order is clearly interlocutory, and not the subject of an independent appeal: Lycoming Fire Insurance Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. v. Snowdon, 161 Pa. 201; Platt v. Belsena Coal Mining Co., 191 Pa. 215. Therefore the motion to quash the appeal must be sustained.
Appeal quashed, the costs to be paid by the appellant.