Court Opinion

ID: 992669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:55:58.027497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:35.297356
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARC LORENZO SLOAN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-92-188-G, CA-96-121-2)

Submitted:   July 24, 1997                 Decided:   July 31, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Lorenzo Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OF-
FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommenda-

tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Sloan, Nos. CR-92-188-G, CA-96-121-2 (M.D.N.C. June 5,

1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June

23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2