Court Opinion

ID: 9951384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-15 21:00:41.834471+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:39:56.182360
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2102      Doc: 11         Filed: 03/14/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-2102

        TITLE OF CONSUL TORNELLO-FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        STATE OF MARYLAND (Inc); LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, a/k/a Larry Hogan;
        RICHARD DELNO FRITZ, Bar Membership # 7706010084; OPIRHORY A., (I.D.
        NO 6678); ST. MARY’S COUNTY (Inc),

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
        Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:23-cv-01229-PX)

        Submitted: March 12, 2024                                         Decided: March 14, 2024

        Before GREGORY, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Tornello Fontaine Pierce El Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Wendy Lozinsky Shiff, OFFICE OF
        THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2102      Doc: 11         Filed: 03/14/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

        complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find

        no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. El-Bey v. Maryland,

        No. 8:23-cv-01229-PX (D. Md. Sept. 18, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2