Court Opinion

ID: 4809075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-21 09:33:47.99331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:32.085964
License: Public Domain

EMAS, J.,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in my dissent to the denial of motion for rehearing en banc in Geter v. State, 115 So.3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the instant case to the extent it holds that the rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct appeal. See also Falcon v. State, 111 So.3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), review granted, No. SC13-865 (Fla.2013).