Court Opinion

ID: 681846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:39:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:00.638933
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1175
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James M. Bivens, Plaintiff Appellant,v.ROANOKE COUNTY SALEM JAIL;  Deputy Martin;  Deputy Purdue,Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6300.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 31, 1994.Decided Nov. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-110)
James M. Bivens, Appellant Pro Se.  Victor O. Cardwell, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny the motion to appoint counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bivens v. Roanoke County Salem Jail, No. CA-93-110 (W.D.Va. Feb. 14, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED