Court Opinion

ID: 9532487
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:21:49.240296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:46.303290
License: Public Domain

WELCH, Chief Justice.
Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing
In petition for rehearing it is pointed out that this decision is contrary to our former decision in the case of Lawrence v. Ayres, 206 Okl. 218, 242 P.2d 142, which opinion cited and followed our former opinion in the case of Lind v. McKinley, 196 Okl. 4, 161 P.2d 1016. In connection with this decision we have carefully examined both the former decisions above cited. We are convinced that the determination set out in this opinion is contrary to both our two former decisions above cited. However, we are convinced that the opinion in this case is correct and should stand. Therefore we hereby expressly overrule our former decisions in Lind v. McKinley and Lawrence v. Ayres, supra, insofar as they, or either of them, are contrary to the decision and opinion in this case.
CORN, V. C. J., and HALLEY, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
DAVISON and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent.