Court Opinion

ID: 9307166
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:17:59.556635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:57.882919
License: Public Domain

SnOWAI/TER, Circuit Judge.
The declaration is on an agreement whereby the defendant was to pay royalties to the plaintiff. Assuming such an agreement, defendant cannot attack the patent. If there were no such agreement, either express or implied, plaintiff cannot recover. Therefore the pleas are bad. Each of the two pleas in question goes to all the counts, — the special count and the common counts, — and nonassumpsit is also pleaded to the entire declaration. Therefore, no question arises on this demurrer touching the sufficiency of the first count. A demurrer to a sjiecial plea cannot he carried back to a defective count, when the general issue or some other good plea, is also pleaded to said count; nor, where the special plea, goes to all the counts, can a demurrer to such plea he *320carried, back to one count which, is defective, the others being good. In the former case, the good plea waives a demurrer to the count; in the latter, the demurrer, if carried back, would go to the entire declaration, and, since some of the counts are good, Would of course be overruled.
A notice of defense, under the statute, is not good here, on my ruling that the declaration is in assumpsit, and not in case; on an agreement to pay royalties, and not for an infringement. The question whether there was a consideration for the promise alleged, or any other question that may be made on the first count of the declaration, is not before the court on this demurrer.