Court Opinion

ID: 6734609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:17:18.130651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:43.525912
License: Public Domain

Bartholomew, J.
(concurring.) I concur in the foregoing opinion, but also deem it proper to go one step further than my Brother Corliss has gone. Assuming that the territorial statutes were controlling in the matter of giving the undertaking on appeal from the original judgment in admiralty, I then think that the undertaking sued upon should be sustained as a statutory *246undertaking given to stay execution upon a judgment for the delivery of personal property. True, the judgment was not such in form, but the facts found show that it was such in its practical effect, and all the parties to the litigation so treated it. I am authorized by the chief justice to say that he concurs in this view, also.