Court Opinion

ID: 5136295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-20 08:14:55.485366+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:54.794221
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                              FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                   CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellate case name:        Buck Alan Winton v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number:      01-20-00155-CR

Trial court case number: 85805-CR

Trial court:                239th District Court of Brazoria County

         On August 13, 2020, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and remanding to the
trial court for a hearing to determine why appellant had failed to make financial arrangements for
the filing of the clerk’s record. We directed the trial court to have a supplemental clerk’s record
filed containing its findings and conclusions and a reporter’s record of the hearing filed in this
Court by September 11, 2020. No hearing record was filed and the supplemental clerk’s record
filed on September 11, 2020, contained no findings and conclusions.
        On August 31, 2020, while the case was abated, retained counsel Shawn Roberts filed a
motion to dismiss the appeal. On October 6, 2020, this Court denied the motion to dismiss without
prejudice to refile a motion in compliance with the requirement of Rule 42.2(a) to include
appellant’s signature. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). No further motion to dismiss was filed. No
clerk’s record has been filed.
        Accordingly, this Court must continue the abatement and direct the trial court to conduct a
hearing at which a representative of the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, retained
counsel Shawn Roberts, and appellant shall be present.* The trial court shall have a court reporter
record the hearing. The trial court is directed to make appropriate findings on these issues:
       (1)     whether appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal; and, if so,
       (2)     whether retained counsel Roberts has abandoned the appeal;

*      If appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing
       by closed-circuit video teleconferencing. Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video
       teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and
       interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys
       representing the State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel shall be able
       to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney
       representing the State.
       (3)   and, if so, whether appellant is presently
             (a) indigent, in which case the trial court should appoint new appellate counsel at no
                  expense to appellant and establish a date by which the clerk’s record will be filed,
                  no later than 30 days from the appointment; or
             (b) not indigent, in which case the trial court should establish a date by which
                 appellant shall retain new counsel;
       (4)   or, if retained counsel Roberts has not abandoned the appeals, make appropriate
             findings and recommendations regarding the reason that counsel has failed to make
             payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, no later than 30 days from the date of
             this order.
TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04; TEX. R. APP. P. 35.2, 35.3(a), (c)
        The trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings and
recommendations, including the name, address, telephone number, and State Bar number of any
substitute counsel, and the reporter’s record of the hearing, to be filed in this Court no later than
January 28, 2022. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified video recording
of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than January 28, 2022.

        The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket.
The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record that
complies with this order, and the reporter’s record of the hearing, have been filed in this Court.
The trial court coordinator shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the Clerk of this Court
of such date.
       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Peter Kelly______
                    Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __December 14, 2021_____