Court Opinion

ID: 4827837
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-22 15:07:53.660464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:18.280809
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying the defendant’s motion for re-sentencing following Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). But see Howard v. State, 180 So.3d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (Altenbemd, J., concurring); Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), review granted 160 So.3d 892 (Fla.2014).