Court Opinion

ID: 1023748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:42:31.665905+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:11.109185
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 07-7051

HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

EARNESTINE M. PEPPER,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:07-cv-01116-HMH)

Submitted: August 30, 2007             Decided:     September 11, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.         We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.           Martin v. Pepper,

No. 6:07-cv-01116-HMH (D.S.C. June 25, 2007).           We dispense with

oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal    contentions   are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -