Court Opinion

ID: 802558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-19 17:24:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:04.655084
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-20809     Document: 00511891259         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/19/2012

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 19, 2012
                                     No. 11-20809
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS ARTURO JUAREZ-MARTINEZ, also known as Jesus Arturo-Juarez,
also known as Jesus Jaurez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:08-CR-406-1

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Arturo Juarez-
Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Juarez-Martinez has filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein,
as well as Juarez-Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.