Court Opinion

ID: 5869126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 01:42:19.908682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:39.460828
License: Public Domain

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of defense counsel’s brief filed pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and we have also reviewed the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.