Court Opinion

ID: 23220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:07:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:32.029288
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-10889
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 3:00-CR-120-1-D
                       --------------------
                         February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Cesar Mendoza-Hernandez (“Mendoza-Hernandez”) appeals his

sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry

following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

(b)(2).   He argues that a prior felony conviction must be alleged

in the indictment because it is an element of the offense, rather

than a mere sentence enhancement.

     Mendoza-Hernandez acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 00-10889
                                 -2-

Court review in the light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000).   Indeed, Mendoza-Hernandez’ argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres.    See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979,

984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Jan. 26,

2001)(No. 00-8299).

     AFFIRMED.