Court Opinion

ID: 6317548
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-25 15:06:11.148082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:31.664370
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA
            COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CAMSOFT          DATA       SYSTEMS,          INC.                                                 NO.         2021    CW    1578

VERSUS

SOUTHERN ELECTRONICS                         SUPPLY,
YNC.      AND ACTIVE             SOLUTIONS,
LLC                                                                                                FEBRUARY           25,    2022

In    Re:             MMR    Group,           Inc.,       MMR      Offshore                  Services,          Inc.        and    MMR
                      Constructors,                Inc.        d/ b/ a        MMR        Communications,              applying
                      for       supervisory             writs,               19th       Judicial              District  Court,
                      Parish       of    East         Baton     Rouge,             No.       582741.

BEFORE:               WHIPPLE,          C. J.,        PENZATO        AND       HESTER,            JJ.

          WRIT        NOT    CONSIDERED.                 This writ application fails to comply
with        Uniform             Rules        of       Louisiana               Courts              of     Appeal,        Rule        4-
5( C)(    6).        Relators,          MMR       Group,        Inc.,          MMR        Offshore             Services,          Inc.
and      MMR     Constructors,                   Inc.        d/ b/ a         MMR    Communications,                   failed        to
include          a    signed           copy      of     the     judgment                or                     complained
                                                                                                 ruling                            of.

Additionally,                the       writ      application                 does        not      contain        a    transcript
of       the     contradictory                 hearing           on          relators              motion        for        partial

summary          judgment,             and    the       trial        court'         s    reasons
                                                                                                              for denying the
motion          are    not       otherwise            evident           from        the          writ        application.          See
La.       Code        Civ.        P.      art.          966( D)(       4).              Accordingly,                 this     court

requires a copy of the transcript of the pertinent hearing.

          Supplementation                     of         this          writ              application                 and/ or        an
application             for      rehearing              will       not        be    considered.                 Uniform       Rules
of    Louisiana             Courts       of Appeal,             Rules          2- 18. 7 &          4-    9.

          In     the       event       relator          seeks          to      file          a   new         application          with
this        court,         it    must        contain                                             items,
                                                               all       required
                                                                                                               including           the
missing         documentation                 noted          above,           and       must      comply        with        Rule 2-
12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.                                                                   Any new
application             must       be     filed         on    or     before             March          28,    2022,     and       must

contain a copy of this ruling.

                                                                VGW
                                                                AHP
                                                                CHH

COURT       OF APPEAL,            FIRST       CIRCUIT

         DEPUTY       CL    RK    OF    COURT
                FOR    THE       COURT