Court Opinion

ID: 6763506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:34:05.801171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:39.365884
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also agree that suspension with a conditioned probation is the appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. However, the suspension will be stayed in favor of a two-year moni*79tored probation period during which respondent must comply with the conditions imposed by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.