Court Opinion

ID: 2151167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:28:21.669789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:27.337393
License: Public Domain

27 Mich. App. 417 (1970)
183 N.W.2d 597
PEOPLE
v.
HOLLINGWORTH
Docket No. 9,772.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided October 27, 1970.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
George W. Schudlich (Edward P. Echlin, of counsel), for defendant on appeal.
*418 Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and HOLBROOK and T.M. BURNS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
While represented by counsel defendant tendered a plea of guilty to attempted sale of a narcotic drug, a lesser included offense in count one of the information.[1] Upon defendant's timely request appellate counsel was appointed on his behalf. A timely claim of appeal which was subsequently filed on behalf of the defendant raises one question for review. It is contended that the failure of the trial judge to examine the defendant as to the geographical location of the alleged crime, constitutes reversible error. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction on the grounds that the question presented for review is so unsubstantial as to warrant no argument or formal submission.
The information properly sets out the time and place of the crime for which defendant now stands convicted. Defendant does not dispute the accuracy of the information. He merely contends that his failure to recite these facts before the trial court during the time of the plea proceeding constitutes reversible error. This contention is fatuous.
"When an accused voluntarily pleads guilty to a charge set forth in the people's information and his plea is accepted duly by the court, he admits the charge as laid, provides all evidence requisite to sentencing, and thereby waives all previously available objections to the proceedings which led up to and became merged in the legal result of his plea." People v. Collins (1968), 380 Mich 131, 141.
The motion to affirm is granted.
NOTES
[1]  MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287), MCLA § 335.152 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1122).