Court Opinion

ID: 9397228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-24 19:05:13.990955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:22.408641
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                            Electronically Filed
                                            Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                            CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                            24-MAY-2023
                                            08:26 AM
                                            Dkt. 162 OGMD

                        NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

               IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                      OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

           JEFFREY SCOTT GOOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
 HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.; HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES,
 INC.; ELIZABETH DEER; SHANA M. BUCO, Defendants-Appellees, and
     JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10;
          DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10; and
            DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

       APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                   (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

              ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
    (By:   Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)
           Upon consideration of self-represented Plaintiff-

Appellant Jeffrey Scott Goold's (Goold) May 15, 2023 Motion for

Reconsideration, the papers in support, and the record, it

appears that Goold seeks reconsideration of the May 10, 2023

Order, but Goold fails to demonstrate that the court overlooked

or misapprehended any point of law or fact.     Hawai i Rules of

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40(b).     Further, Goold states

that if the court declines his request for reconsideration, then

he requests the court to approve his proposed stipulation to

dismiss the appeal with prejudice, attached to the motion for

reconsideration, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees

and costs, under HRAP Rule 42(b).    Neither Goold nor counsel for
  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

any other party in the appeal signed or dated Goold's proposed

stipulation.    Nonetheless, the court will construe the proposed

stipulation as a motion to dismiss the appeal, under HRAP

Rule 42(b), and grant the requested relief.

          Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied, and the motion to dismiss the appeal

is granted.    The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.    The parties

shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

          DATED:    Honolulu, Hawai i, May 24, 2023.

                                      /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
                                      Presiding Judge

                                      /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                      Associate Judge

                                      /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan
                                      Associate Judge

                                  2