Court Opinion

ID: 6323878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-16 19:01:57.267685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:45.071437
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 21-4047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff - Appellee,

              v.

DIQUELLE SWEET,

                     Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cr-00042-D-2)

Submitted: March 9, 2022                                          Decided: March 16, 2022

Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Deborrah L. Newton, NEWTON LAW, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellant. David A. Bragdon, Kristine L. Fritz, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United
States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Diquelle Sweet seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. The Government has

moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. In criminal cases, a defendant’s notice of appeal

must be filed within 14 days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With

or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court

may grant an extension of up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4).

       Although the appeal period in a criminal case is not a jurisdictional provision, but

rather a claim-processing rule, United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009),

“we must dismiss” the appeal “[w]hen the Government promptly invokes the rule in

response to a late-filed criminal appeal,” United States v. Oliver, 878 F.3d 120, 123 (4th

Cir. 2017). When the Government moves to dismiss the appeal within the time required

by Local Rule 27(f), * this court will grant the motion. United States v. Hyman, 884 F.3d

496, 500 (4th Cir. 2018).

       The district court entered judgment on August 17, 2018. Sweet filed the notice of

appeal, at the earliest, on February 3, 2021. Because Sweet failed to file a timely notice of

appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, and the Government has promptly

invoked the appeal’s untimeliness, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss and

dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

       *
        Local Rule 27(f)(2) requires that motions to dismiss be filed within the time
allowed for filing a response brief. Here, the Government complied with that rule.

                                             2
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             DISMISSED

                                            3