Court Opinion

ID: 6545838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:19:29.689241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:57.862883
License: Public Domain

Battle, J. This action was brought by Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Company against the Louisiana & Northwest Railroad Company for the damages sustained by it on account of the loss of parts of machinery shipped in the year 1899 over the defendant’s railroad as the last of a line of three connecting carriers. It alleged in its complaint that the defendant undertook to ship certain machinery from McNeil, Arkansas, to State Line, a station on its road, in the State of Louisiana, but negligently failed to carry and safely deliver all of the same to the consignees, J. T. DeLoach & Bro., and lost certain parts thereof, to the damage of the plaintiff in the sum of $155.34. On the second day of September, 1902, in open court, the defendant filed its answer, and denied therein that the machinery was delivered to it, and that it undertook to carry and safely deliver the same to the consignee at its place of destination, and that by reason of its negligence any part thereof was lost. On the 2d day of September, 1903, the issues in the case came on to be tried before a jury. After the evidence was closed and the witnesses in the case were discharged, the defendant was allowed to amend its answer so as to allege that it was stipulated in the bill of lading given for the shipment of the machinery that “claims for damages must be reported by the consignee in writing to the delivery line within thirty-six hours after the consignee had been notified of the arrival of the freight at the place of delivery,” and that if spch notice was not given the defendant should not be liable, and to allege that such notice was not given. The plaintiff thereupon moved for a continuance in order to prepare to meet the new defense, and the court overruled the motion. The court, over the objection of the plaintiff, instructed the jury, in part, at the request of the defendant, as follows: “3. The court instructs the jury that if they find from the bill of lading introduced as evidence in this cause that it contains a stipulation that claims for damages must be reported by the consignee in writing to the delivery line within thirty-six hours after the consignee has been notified of the arrival of the freight at the place of delivery, they will find for the defendant, the Louisiana & Northwest Railroad Company, unless they further find from the evidence that the said J. T. DeLoach & Bro. reported said damages in writing to the defendant within thirty-six hours, as therein stipulated, provided thirty-six hours was a reasonable time, as defined in another instruction given by the court.” The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. After the answer remained on file for one year without amendment the plaintiff had reason to believe no new or additional defense would be pleaded by the defendant. It was guilty of no negligence in failing to be ready to meet the new issue. It was not reasonable to presume that it would be prepared to do so, as it was not, especially after the discharge of the witnesses.. Whether it could have done so, it was not allowed the time or opportunity to make the necessary inquiries for information. It was. certainly just and right that it should have been allowed the privilege to do so. The court erred in denying it the privilege. Beverse and remand for a new trial.