Court Opinion

ID: 5572161
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:14:46.978945+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:47.498886
License: Public Domain

Candler, J.
No complaint is made that the court below committed any error of law. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for anew trial, which was based only on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except'Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Complaint. Before Frank Harwell, judge pro hac vice. City court of LaG-range. June 30, 1902.
Dorsey, BrevMer & Howell and A. H. Thompson, for plaintiff in error. E. T. Moon, contra.