Court Opinion

ID: 6132176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 21:17:24.517969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:42.303425
License: Public Domain

Follett, J.:
Supplementary proceedings were instituted on a County Court judgment before the recorder of the city of Oswego, who referred the matter to a referee to take and report the evidence. The .attorney for the plaintiff in-the proceedings signed a subpoena which was tested in the name of the judge of the County Court and purported to bear the signature of the county clerk. The original ■subpoena was exhibited to the appellant and a ticket containing the substance of the original subpoena was delivered to her and her fees as a witness paid. The papers in form and the proceedings under them were sufficient to legally subpoena a witness to testify in an action pending in a County Court. The witness failed to attend, for which she was adjudged in contempt and fined thirty dollars by the recorder.
Supplementary proceedings are special proceedings. (Code Civil Pro., § 2433.) The subpoena should have issued under the hand of the referee before whom the witness was required to testify. (Code *246Civil Pro., § 854, and Throop’s note to § 2444.) A person cannot be punished for disobeying a process issued without authority.
The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Hardin, P. J., and Yann, J., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.