Court Opinion

ID: 991967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:45:05.216083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:49.711741
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-6910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

COREY VIDEL SWAIN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-71-F, CA-96-247-5-F)

Submitted:   April 17, 1997                 Decided:   April 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Videl Swain, Appellant Pro Se. William Arthur Webb, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Swain, Nos. CR-93-71-F; CA-96-247-5-F
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2