Court Opinion

ID: 5890262
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:45:42.940827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:18.994420
License: Public Domain

At trial, the defendant did not specify why the charge as to alibi as given was inadequate; therefore the claimed error was not preserved for our review as a matter of law (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022, 1023). In any event, a review of the alibi charge convinces us that it did, indeed, unequivocally convey the People’s burden to disprove an alibi beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Victor, 62 NY2d 374). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Arce, 42 NY2d 179, 187). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.