Court Opinion

ID: 719915
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 07:49:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:39.682805
License: Public Domain

86 F.3d 1150
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Steven E. HESTER, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Jack GEISE, U.S. Attorney;  Bonnie Greenberg, U.S.A.;  LauraGwinn, States Attorney;  S.P. Stowe, FBI;  Ed Ryan, FBI;Mark Valderez, FBI;  Maurice Hicks, P.G. Police;  DetectiveBabcock, P.G. Police, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-8600.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 3, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Andre M. Davis, District Judge.  (CA-95-3552-AMD)
D.Md. SY AFFIRMED.
Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

2
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.   We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Hester v. Geise, No. CA-95-3552-AMD (D.Md. Dec. 7, 1995).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED