Court Opinion

ID: 9365129
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 21:00:27.748532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.304602
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6874      Doc: 7         Filed: 01/20/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-6874

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      v.

        KEVIN MICHAEL HUFFMAN,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
        Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:19-cr-00163-1)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 20, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kevin Michael Huffman, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6874         Doc: 7     Filed: 01/20/2023    Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Kevin Michael Huffman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial

        of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble,

        992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the

        record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

        district court. United States v. Huffman, No. 2:19-cr-00163-1 (S.D.W. Va. July 20, 2022).

              We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                                   2