Court Opinion

ID: 3949770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:11:58.95073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:32.868935
License: Public Domain

For the first time on motion for rehearing appellant complains that the purported charge of the court as found in the record does not bear the signature of the trial judge. No complaint was made of this in the court below. Allen's case265 S.W. 580, is conclusive against the contention.
We think the case was properly decided on original submission. Under the facts, in view of appellant's own evidence given on the trial, we would not feel called upon to reverse although some of the special charges refused might have been pertinent. (Art. 743, C. C. P.)
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.