Court Opinion

ID: 8679787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:26:23.839103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.246118
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anton Johnson, a District of Columbia Code offender civilly committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (2012), appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02250-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 19, 2015; entered Oct. 20, 2015). Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.