Court Opinion

ID: 7194324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 17:00:36.692518+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:16.676730
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the Court, was delivered by
PochJs, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rejecting her demand for a decree of separation from bed and board from her husband, and for the custody of one of the children born of the marriage. Her complaint contains charges of cruel treatment and other causes, including blows and an attempt to take her life, against, the husband,
The defense consists mainly of counter-charges of faults and excesses on the part of the wife.
The testimony goes to some extent to prove mutual wrongs between the spouses, but they are not of the same nature, and we leave the record with the clear conviction that the faults proved against the wile ¡we the natural consequences and the inevitable outgrowth of the systematic, continuous and insupportable persecution which for years she received at the hands ef her brutal husband.
It is in proof that lie daily ill-treated and grossly insulted her, by applying vile epithets to her, ordering her to leave his house, in the presence of their children, of the servants and of visitors who happened to be in the house; that lie frequently struck her with his flat; *476that on two occasions he inflicted bodily harm on her person by means of things which he threw at her during his anger, and that on one occasion he shot at her with a pistol.
Her greatest wrongs, as shown by ihe record, consisted in retaliating vile epithets at him, and on one occasion during the pendency of a previous suit for separation in which she was non-suited owing to the withdrawal of her counsel, it appears that she broke and destroyed some furniture which officers of the law were about to seize and to remove from her premises at the instance of the husband.
Our examination of the evidence leaves no doubt on our minds as to her right to claim the protection of the law from the excesses of a man whose brutality has gone so far as to endanger her life. Thomas vs. Taillieu, 13 Ann. 127; Dillon vs. Dillon, 32 Ann. 643.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided and reversed, and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, that plaintiff do have and recover judgment against the defendant, her husband, decreeing a separation of bed and board between them, and granting to plaintiff the permanent custody of the daughter, Lena Bonet, issue of the marriage, and condemning the defendant to pay costs in both courts.