Court Opinion

ID: 9515200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:54:32.156325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:26.100445
License: Public Domain

SABERS, Justice
(concurring).
[¶ 19.] I concur.
[¶ 20.] I agree with the determination of an easement for ingress and egress of an undetermined width. I write specially to make clear such easement is limited to one vehicle at a time.
[¶ 21.] In my view, the position of the Scott Trust could only be sustained if there was evidence that Scott and its predecessors drove three vehicles side by side in and out at least annually over the required period. There is no such evidence and such evidence is required before obtaining a 22' wide easement on someone else’s property. In fact, there is no evidence that on even one occasion two vehicles entered or exited simultaneously.