Court Opinion

ID: 4222365
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-21 14:13:47.198949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:06.678958
License: Public Domain

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 116
The People &c.,
            Respondent,
        v.
Leroy Savage Smith,
            Appellant.

          Philip Rothschild, for appellant.
          James P. Maxwell, for respondent.
          New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.

MEMORANDUM:
          The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed
and a new trial ordered.
          Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of
assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon

                              - 1 -
                                  - 2 -                           No. 116

in the fourth degree and sentenced.        The Appellate Division
unanimously affirmed the judgment (see People v Smith, 140 AD3d
1699 [4th Dept 2016]).
            We agree with defendant that the trial court failed to
adequately inquire into his "seemingly serious request[]" to
substitute counsel (see People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]).
Defendant's request was supported by "specific factual
allegations of 'serious complaints about counsel'" (People v
Porto, 16 NY3d 93, 100 [2010], quoting People v Medina, 44 NY2d
199, 207 [1978]), and a "minimal inquiry" into "the nature of the
disagreement or its potential for resolution" was warranted
(Sides, 75 NY2d at 825).     Accordingly, the trial court abused its
discretion by failing to conduct such an inquiry.
*   *   *    *   *   *   *    *    *      *   *   *   *   *   *     *   *
Order reversed and a new trial ordered, in a memorandum. Chief
Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and
Feinman concur.

Decided November 21, 2017

                                  - 2 -