Court Opinion

ID: 9797380
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 04:19:23.187385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:49.499840
License: Public Domain

Becker, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur with the majority analysis regarding the statute of repose. I respectfully dissent however on Davenport’s claim that Comstock Hills was negligent in failing to warn her of the alleged unsafe precipice. Davenport was a resident of Comstock Hills and was aware of the drop-off between the landscaping and the parking areas. Moreover, the drop is clearly visible to a reasonable person who might be cutting across the grass. I would affirm the granting of the summary judgment on the failure to warn claim *396since her knowledge and the open and obvious nature of the drop negates any need for a warning.