Court Opinion

ID: 9660429
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:13:20.850529+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:19.454875
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Judge.
Appellant, if we understand his position correctly, contends that the evidence did not overcome the outstanding hypothesis that Orby Arthur and not he possessed the intoxicants. We call attention to the fact that the record shows that Arthur’s trailer house, located some 75 yards from appellant’s house, was searched .and no intoxicants or evidence thereof were found and the record fails to reflect that any trails were found leading from such trailer *534house to any of the concealed intoxicants, while the trails were shown to lead from appellant’s house to the places where the intoxicants were found. See Stewart v. State, 127 Texas Cr. Rep. 147, 74 S.W. 2d 1003.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.