Court Opinion

ID: 994641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:25:55.183264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:38.008151
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6138

OLADAYO OLADOKUN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-97-3957-AW)

Submitted:   March 26, 1998                 Decided:   April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se.    Ranganath Manthripragada,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. According-

ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States
v. Oladokun, No. CA-97-3957-AW (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2