Court Opinion

ID: 5474454
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:45:54.658714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:25.960654
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

This case is sui generis, and distinguishable from the ordinary case, where a party is ordered to pay costs. The defendant asked for a favour, which was granted to him, upon the payment of costs. That was the condition on which the trial of the cause was put off; and it ought to have been, performed by the defendant, without any previous demand or request of the plaintiff. The costs ought to have been paid instanter ; and it was the duty of the defendant to seek the plaintiff, and tender the costs, without waiting for a formal demand of them. The costs were regularly taxed, and payment of the bill demanded of the defendants’ attorney, who attended the taxation, having been previously served with a copy of the bill, and notice of the taxation. The case of Jackson, ex dem. Lewis, v. Lowry, (2 Johns. Cases, 114.) is in point, to show that the demand of the costs of the attorney was regular, and that an attachment will lie in this case.
Rule granted.