Court Opinion

ID: 3098213
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:49:52.099317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:02.568457
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-11-00723-CR

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JOSE CUELLAR,                                                           APPELLANT,

                                          v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                               APPELLEE.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 319th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
          Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Jose Cuellar, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for

aggravated robbery. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

      This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a
timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       The trial court imposed sentence in this matter on February 28, 2007. Appellant

filed his notice of appeal on November 4, 2011. On November 17, 2011, the Clerk of this

Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and that

the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the

date of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant has not filed a response to the Court=s

directive.

       Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2).

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

       Appellant=s notice of appeal, filed more than four years after sentence was

imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.          See

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

                                             2
CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988
S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

      The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                    PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed
26th day of January, 2012.

                                         3