Court Opinion

ID: 5743896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:46:11.499051+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:07.039032
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered March 25, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Grosso, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress lineup identification evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress lineup identification evidence (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]; People v Arroyo, 38 AD3d 792, 793 [2007]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not the only one in the lineup wearing a black T-shirt. Moreover, the defendant’s clothing did not figure prominently in the complainant’s description of him, and there was no testimony adduced at the Wade hearing (see United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967]) that the complainant relied on clothing in identifying the defendant in the lineup (see People v Tinnen, 238 AD2d 615, 616 [1997]).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Andolina, 23 AD3d 573 [2005]; People v Cannon, 1 AD3d 606 [2003]; People v Brown, 309 AD2d 871 [2003]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.