Court Opinion

ID: 8433218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 09:11:40.344313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:39.664506
License: Public Domain

SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant pleaded guilty to a one count indictment charging him with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced to a 41 month term of imprisonment, based in part on a four level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2k2.1(b)(5) for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. At sentencing, defendant objected to the enhancement based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) .
In United States v. Fagans, 406 F.3d 138 (2d Cir.2005), we recently decided that the remand procedure set forth in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), is inapplicable in cases where the error was preserved and plain error analysis therefore does not apply. Here, as the enhancement was unquestionably a violation of the Sixth Amendment, and the compulsory use of the Guidelines was erroneous under United States v. Booker, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) , and because defendant preserved his objection to the error, we REMAND to the District Court with instructions to vacate the sentence and re-sentence in conformity with Booker and this Order.