Court Opinion

ID: 5134248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-13 08:19:14.137841+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:42.531830
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-21-00093-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

               TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                          TYLER, TEXAS

ALLEN DWIGHT SHEPPARD,                                  §        APPEAL FROM THE 114TH
APPELLANT

V.                                                      §        JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE                                                §        SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                          PER CURIAM
       A jury found Allen Dwight Sheppard “guilty” of aggravated assault with a deadly
weapon.    Appellant entered a plea agreement on sentencing and the trial court sentenced
Appellant to twenty years in prison in accordance with the agreement. Appellant appealed.
       The clerk’s record has been filed and the trial court’s certification states that Appellant
waived the right of appeal. The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(d). The record reflects that after Appellant reached an agreement with the State, the
trial court asked what Appellant decided to do regarding an appeal. Appellant replied, “I’m
good.” Appellant’s counsel subsequently stated, “He just said he did not want to appeal.” The
record contains no written waiver of appeal. Because the record was not entirely clear as to
whether Appellant waived the right of appeal as to punishment only, this Court requested
clarification of the trial court’s certification. After a hearing on November 19, the trial court
filed findings of fact, including the following:

       At his jury trial, after being found guilty but before the punishment phase began, Mr. Sheppard
       entered into an agreed sentence with the State.

       A condition of that agreement was the waiver of his right to appeal any phase of his case.
         Mr. Sheppard consented to the agreement and was sentenced by the court to terms consistent with
         the same.

         At the time he was sentenced, Mr. Sheppard and his attorney represented that they understood
         there was to be no appeal as part of the agreement and Mr. Sheppard stated he was “good” with
         that requirement.

         That this was the understanding of the parties and Mr. Sheppard was confirmed by all at the
         hearing held on 19 November….

         When the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification
of the defendant’s right of appeal. Id. This Court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that
shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. Based on
our review of the record, including the trial court’s recent findings, the trial court’s certification
appears to accurately state that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record
to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). Because the trial court did not grant
Appellant the right to appeal his conviction, we dismiss the appeal.
Opinion delivered December 8, 2021.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

                                             (DO NOT PUBLISH)

                                                          2
                                   COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                         DECEMBER 8, 2021

                                         NO. 12-21-00093-CR

                                  ALLEN DWIGHT SHEPPARD,
                                          Appellant
                                             V.
                                    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                          Appellee

                                Appeal from the 114th District Court
                         of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-0804-20)

                    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
                    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
below for observance.
                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.