Court Opinion

ID: 9688604
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 17:57:54.607592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:40.575561
License: Public Domain

Quinn, P. J.
(dissenting). I can agree with the majority opinion in this case on all points except. *419the determination that the movie referred to is constitutionally obscene. After viewing the film, I am unable to find that it meets the tests announced in Roth v. United States (1957), 354 US 476 (77 S Ct 1304, 1 L Ed 2d 1498) and reaffirmed in Redrup v. New York (1967), 386 US 767 (87 S Ct 1414, 18 L Ed 2d 515). I therefore vote to reverse.