Court Opinion

ID: 9299316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:05:54.443995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:37.356398
License: Public Domain

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice.
After stating the above facts, the rules of law applicable to this case are, that the receipt of so much is only evidence of a payment and satisfaction, and may be explained by parol, or other evidence. This was gone into, and we find that the note was neither paid nor received as satisfaction; but, to constitute a good plea of accord and satisfaction, both should be averred. The plaintiff, then, received a note, which proved unproductive; and it is clear, that it was no satisfaction of this debt, or a discharge of the judgment, unless it were received as such, and the party agreed to run all risks; or, by his after conduct, made it his own. Rule discharged.