Court Opinion

ID: 9641299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 17:27:55.198479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:50:22.820545
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellants interpret us as stating in our original opinion that in overruling their “insufficient” evidence points Nos. 5 and 6, we considered only that evidence which was favorable to the verdict and disregarded that which was contrary thereto. If the language used be subject to such interpretation, we did not so intend. At any rate, in order to clarify the matter we might add that we have again reviewed the record and after considering and weighing all of the evidence, both that in favor of as well as that against the verdict, we are of the opinion that the jury findings attacked by the appellants are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence so as to be manifestly wrong and unjust.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.