Court Opinion

ID: 4465949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-19 19:00:19.902946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:21.341091
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10090      Document: 00515243317         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/19/2019

                     CORRECTED December 19, 2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT    United States Court of Appeals
                                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                                                            November 18, 2019
                                    No. 19-10090
                                 Conference Calendar                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                    Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BAQUAVIOUS RIVERS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:17-CR-460-10

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Baquavious Rivers has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Rivers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10090    Document: 00515243317    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/19/2019

                                No. 19-10090

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
      Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2