Court Opinion

ID: 9911449
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 21:07:35.87971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:58:08.763850
License: Public Domain

People v St. John (2023 NY Slip Op 51375(U))

[*1]

People v St. John (Arnott)

2023 NY Slip Op 51375(U)

Decided on December 18, 2023

Appellate Term, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 18, 2023
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: Hagler, P.J., Brigantti, Tisch, JJ.

570271/19

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
againstArnott St. John, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Jeffrey M. Zimmerman, J.), rendered March 15, 2019, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of driving while impaired, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Jeffrey M. Zimmerman, J.), rendered March 15, 2019, affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's contention that the arresting officer's testimony was "suspect" and unworthy of belief is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not raise this argument at the suppression hearing (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Britton, 113 AD3d 1101, 1102 [2014], lv denied 22 NY3d 1154 [2014]). We decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. Since we do not find the officer's testimony to be manifestly untrue, contrary to common experience, self-contradictory, or tailored, we decline to disturb the court's conclusion that the testimony was credible (see People v Garland, 155 AD3d 527, 529 [2017], affd 32 NY3d 1094 [2018], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2525 [2020]; People v Sanchez, 248 AD2d 306, 307 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 928, 930 [1998]). The officer's observation of a traffic infraction and erratic driving, including defendant swerving into the lane of oncoming traffic while making a wide turn, provided probable cause for the stop of defendant's vehicle (see People v Hinshaw, 35 NY3d 427 [2020]; People v Sullivan, 160 AD2d 824 [1990]). 
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concurDecision Date: December 18, 2023