Court Opinion

ID: 3078372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:33:52.313196+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:52:24.398286
License: Public Domain

In The

                                   Court of Appeals
                      Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                                _________________
                                  NO. 09-12-00468-CV
                                _________________

                        TRISHA WAKAT SHAFER, Appellant

                                             V.

                         JACK NEWTON SHAFER, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

                   On Appeal from the 418th District Court
                        Montgomery County, Texas
                      Trial Cause No. 10-04-03653 CV
________________________________________________________________________

                                         ORDER

       On January 15, 2013, appellant, Trisha Wakat Shafer, filed a Motion for

Determination of Inability to Pay Cost, which we read to include a motion for extension

of time to file an affidavit of indigence. Notice of appeal was filed on October 2, 2012,

and an affidavit of indigence was filed in the trial court on December 26, 2012. The

affidavit was contested and the trial court sustained the contest on January 10, 3013. A

record of the hearing on the contest has been filed with this Court.

       The trial court sustained the contest because its plenary power over the case had

expired and at the time of the hearing on the contest appellant had not obtained an

                                             1
extension of time to file the affidavit of indigence. The trial court did not consider the

merits of appellant’s claim of indigence. When an appellant fails to seek indigent status

in the manner required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal cannot be

dismissed without providing a reasonable time to correct the defect. See Tex. R. App. P.

20.1(c)(3); Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff’s Office, 193 S.W.3d 898 (Tex. 2006).

       It is, therefore, ORDERED that an extension of time for filing the declaration of

indigence is GRANTED. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(3). The appellee, the district clerk,

and the court reporter previously filed contests, but the trial court did not reach the merits

of the appellant’s claim of indigence because appellant neither filed the affidavit with her

notice of appeal nor obtained an extension of time. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a)(2), (c)(1).

We remand the case to the trial court for a determination of the appellant’s indigence.

See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i). The Rule provides that the trial court shall rule on the merits

of the contest within ten days after the trial court receives this Order. See Tex. R. App. P.

20.1(i)(2)(B). If the trial court sustains the contest, appellant must file a motion seeking

review of that order with this Court within ten days after the order sustaining the contest

is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j). All other appellate timetables are suspended while

the trial court has the case.

       ORDER ENTERED January 31, 2013.

                                                                 PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

                                              2