Court Opinion

ID: 9795057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 03:19:01.574907+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:03.029271
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 18, 2013, 720 F.3d 285)
PER CURIAM:
Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the re*1013quest of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 7 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges King, Davis, Dennis, Elrod, Graves, and Higginson), and 8 judges voted against rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Prado, Owen, Southwick, and Haynes).