Court Opinion

ID: 3098359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:50:30.31888+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:14:05.201720
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-11-00650-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

WOODFOREST GOLF CLUB, LLC,
AND WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK, N. A.,                               APPELLANTS,

                                         v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS,
MONTGOMERY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
AND MONTGOMERY CAPITAL GP,                       APPELLEES.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 410th District Court
                 of Montgomery County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
          Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellants, Woodforest Golf Club, LLC and Woodforest National Bank, N.A.,

perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 410th District Court of Montgomery

County, Texas, in cause number 08-06-05452-CV consolidated with 08-10-10046-CV.
Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the

parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences.

Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a).    Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against

the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties,

the court will tax costs against the appellant.").       Having dismissed the appeal at

appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
12th day of January, 2012.

                                           2