Court Opinion

ID: 9568388
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:03:07.455245+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:24:42.198062
License: Public Domain

Boyle, J.
(concurring in parí). I agree with parts I, II, ih(a), and iv of the lead opinion. Given that the par*129ties have not presented arguments involving the relationship between “disability,” “earning capacity,” and wages the employee is “able to earn,” I express no opinion regarding the remainder of part m of the lead opinion. The parties do not dispute application of § 361,1 and I therefore agree that a remand to the magistrate for application of § 361 is proper.
Mallett, J., concurred with Boyle, J.

 MCL 418.361; MSA 17.237(361).

 The WCAB substantially modified the magistrate’s opinion, but did not clearly order a remand.