Court Opinion

ID: 815180
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-01-11 16:05:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:30.016892
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                IN RE FINJAN, INC.
                ______________________

                      2011-1542
            (Reexamination No. 90/008,684)
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant.
With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and JAMES R.
HANNAH.

    NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN,
Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J.
MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.
                ______________________
THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON,   AND   O’MALLEY, Circuit
Judges).

          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 January 11, 2013            /s/ Jan Horbaly
      Date                      Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk