Court Opinion

ID: 9691160
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 20:14:16.208052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:05.351684
License: Public Domain

*705WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.
¶ 47. (concurring). I join that part of the majority opinion that holds that the Diocese is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law as to the element of notice. However, I would not reach the First Amendment issue. The court does not generally decide constitutional questions if the case can be resolved on other grounds. Labor and Farm Party v. Election Board, 117 Wis. 2d 351, 354, 344 N.W.2d 177 (1984). I state no opinion as to that issue.