Court Opinion

ID: 3105571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:47:59.029487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:40.830887
License: Public Domain

02-12-363-CV

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-12-00363-CV
 
 

Ruby Lucille Hall

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box, and
  Jack in the Box, Inc.

 

APPELLEES

 
 
------------
 
FROM THE 141st
District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1] AND
JUDGMENT
------------
 
We
have considered “Appellant's Motion To Dismiss All Claims Against Jack In The
Box, Inc.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted;
therefore, we dismiss the appeal against Jack in the Box, Inc. only.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).  This case shall hereafter be styled Ruby
Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box.
          Costs
of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
 
                                                                             PER
CURIAM
PANEL: 
MEIER,
GARDNER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

 
DELIVERED:
 February 14, 2013

 

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.