Court Opinion

ID: 6809522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 18:51:53.364592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:36.173080
License: Public Domain

*591OPINION.
Littleton:
The petitioner claims in his income-tax return for 1922 a deduction from gross income of $10,675.62, being the total amount of notes then held by him against J. R. Reid, which notes he asserts he ascertained in 1922 to be worthless and charged off in that year.
Petitioner and Reid were brothers-in-law; petitioner apparently prosperous and successful in his business with a commendable desire and earnest determination to help in a most indulgent and generous way his brother-in-law, who had a large family, was unfortunate in business, had practically no property and was insolvent from about 1906.
In Simon Kohn, 8 B. T. A. 547, 548, we stated:
In order for the petitioner to be entitled to the deduction claimed it is incumbent upon him to introduce evidence to show that the indebtedness was ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year. There is no evidence that the debtor was in worse financial condition in 1921 than he was in years prior thereto. Nothing occurred during that year which would indicate that it was any more uncollectible at that time than in 1920 or-at any period since 1914. The only evidence relating to the indebtedness, Insofar as the year 1921 was concerned, was the charge-off^ If the debtor had *592no assets and could not pay the debt in 1914 or 1915, or in any other year prior to 1921, and that fact was ascertained by the petitioner, he was not permitted to wait until 1921 in order to make the charge-off of the account where no additional facts were ascertained in 1921.
See, also, Thos. J. Avery, 5 B. T. A. 872; affd. 22 Fed. (2d) 6.
We are of opinion that petitioner is not entitled to the deduction claimed in 1922.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.