Court Opinion

ID: 9948689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-07 18:01:02.848134+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:46.217600
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-6162     Document: 010111011607       Date Filed: 03/07/2024   Page: 1
                                                                                  FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                           March 7, 2024
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-6162
                                                    (D.C. No. 5:21-CR-00077-SLP-7)
  RICHARD JACKSON, a/k/a G,                                   (W.D. Okla.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
                          _________________________________

 Before CARSON, EBEL, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges.
                   _________________________________

       Richard Jackson pleaded guilty to money-laundering conspiracy, see 18 U.S.C.

 § 1956(h), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, see id. § 922(g), and received

 a 264-month prison sentence. He has appealed from that sentence, although his plea

 agreement contains an appeal waiver. The government now moves to enforce that

 waiver under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc).

 Through counsel, Jackson states “he does not object to dismissal of this direct appeal

 pursuant to [Hahn].” Resp. at 1. In light of Jackson’s non-opposition, we grant the

 government’s motion to enforce and dismiss this appeal.

                                             Entered for the Court
                                             Per Curiam

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.