Court Opinion

ID: 8801440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 14:34:17.583553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:03:55.117192
License: Public Domain

SANBORN, Circuit Judge,
concurs in the affirmance on the ground that the appellee was not estopped by his original claim, his receipt of a dividend upon it, and his other acts from refunding the portion of the dividend derived from the portion of the claim based on the amount due upon the drafts and recovering the proceeds thereof. Rankin v. Tygard, 198 Red. 795, 797, 806, 119 C. C. A. 591, 593, 602, and authorities there cited; Thomas v. Taggart, 209 U. S. 385, 391, 392, 28 Sup. Ct. 519, 52 L. Ed. 845.