Court Opinion

ID: 9771644
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 16:49:55.224577+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:34.233869
License: Public Domain

on appellant’s motion for rehearing
WOODLEY, Judge.
A condition of the order granting probation not mentioned in the original opinion, and not referred to in the motion of the district attorney to revoke probation, was that appellant “seek and keep gainful employment.” The agreed statement of the evidence adduced at the hearing on the question of whether the probation should be revoked contains the statement “The evidence also reveals that the defendant was not employed at the time of arrest, and had only worked 8 or 4 days over a period of months.”
The court’s order revoking the probation includes the following: “Further, the Court is of the opinion and finds that the defendant, Fred L. Felan, did violate a condition of his probation in that he failed to keep steadily employed during the time of his probation.”
For this additional reason we are unable to agree that the trial court abused his discretion in revoking probation.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.