Court Opinion

ID: 9929857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-05 16:01:59.005065+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:58:11.064736
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-2345
                         ___________________________

                         Kyle Greene; Krystle Lynn Greene

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

                                            v.

              Meeker County Department of Human Services (DHS)

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                          for the District of Minnesota
                                  ____________

                             Submitted: January 31, 2024
                               Filed: February 5, 2024
                                    [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Kyle and Krystle Greene appeal the district court’s1 denial of their Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of their pro se complaint.

      1
      The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we
conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b)
motion. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of
review); Chester v. St. Louis Hous. Auth., 820 F.2d 259, 260 (8th Cir. 1987) (per
curiam) (stating that Rule 60(b) provides for relief only under exceptional
circumstances and is not intended to substitute for a timely appeal). Accordingly, we
affirm and deny the Greenes’ motion to modify the caption as moot. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
                       ______________________________

                                         -2-