Court Opinion

ID: 5876911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:04:02.686544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:53.127183
License: Public Domain

Upon examining all of the proof adduced at the trial, including the incredible testimony of plaintiff’s son that he could not photograph the dangerous condition of the steps within hours after the accident because the condition, created by an extremely prolonged period of neglect, had been remedied within those few hours, we find that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Oleksik v Jones, 41 AD2d 692). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.