Court Opinion

ID: 4316648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-28 19:00:22.962428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:17:56.820423
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-50155      Document: 00514660570         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/28/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-50155                                 FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                    September 28, 2018
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee

versus

ROBERTO LARA,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:16-CR-318-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Lara has

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-50155    Document: 00514660570    Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/28/2018

                                No. 18-50155

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Lara has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with coun-
sel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2