Court Opinion

ID: 9368524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-04 19:08:58.159151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:08.968876
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-22-00437-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

ROBERT CORDER,                                                             Appellant,

                                              v.

OVATION SERVICES, LLC,                                                      Appellee.

                   On appeal from the 214th District Court
                         of Nueces County, Texas.

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva
              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

      On September 29, 2022, appellant filed an amended notice of appeal. On October

6, 2022, and on November 9, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his

amended notice of appeal was not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b). Appellant was also advised in both notices, if the
defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of the notice, the appeal would

be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

       Furthermore, on November 1, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that

the clerk’s record in the above cause was due on October 31, 2022, and that the district

clerk, Ms. Angela Garcia, had notified the Court that appellant failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant

of this failure so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b), (c). Appellant was advised that, if arrangements to pay for

the clerk’s record and proof of payment were not made and filed within ten days from the

date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       Appellant has failed to correct the defects in his amended notice of appeal and has

otherwise not responded to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action

within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

See id. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                               NORA L. LONGORIA
                                                               Justice

Delivered and filed on the
2nd day of February, 2023.

                                             2