Court Opinion

ID: 7423335
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:44:54.503646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:22.523524
License: Public Domain

• PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 23, 1967.
We find that oral'argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs leads us to conclude that *532there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.
Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent’s attorney.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.