Court Opinion

ID: 1012601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:47:41.610433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:11.229067
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 04-6018

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary; CAPTAIN NEDER;
STEVEN ROACH; JEFF NIMES; DAVID LANCASTER,
Lieutenant; STEVE ZOLLNER; WILLIAM SONDERVAN,
Doctor,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
02-3647-8-RDB)

Submitted: February 19, 2004              Decided:   February 26, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court.      See Pearson v.

Simms, No. CA-02-3647-8-RDB (D. Md. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered

Dec. 12, 2003).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                               - 2 -