Court Opinion

ID: 4422200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-01 17:47:50.251266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:00.954593
License: Public Domain

Matter of Simon v Annucci (2019 NY Slip Op 06045)

Matter of Simon v Annucci

2019 NY Slip Op 06045

Decided on August 1, 2019

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: August 1, 2019

528443

[*1]In the Matter of JOSEPH SIMON, Petitioner,
vANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: June 21, 2019

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Devine and Rumsey, JJ.

Joseph Simon, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging two tier III prison disciplinary determinations finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determinations have been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ack v Venettozzi, 169 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2019]; Matter of Williams v Keyser, 167 AD3d 1202, 1202 [2019]). As the record reflects that petitioner was ordered to pay a reduced filing fee of $15 and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount (see Matter of Sockwell v LaClair, 170 AD3d 1416, 1417 [2019]; Matter of Abdul-Halim v Venettozzi, 164 AD3d 1554, 1555 [2018]).
Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Devine and Rumsey, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.