Court Opinion

ID: 1006025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:05:03.393679+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.569378
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-1917

BONNIE LEE DAYE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

ANTHONY M. BRANNON, in his individual capacity
as State Official; E. C. BRYSON, in his indi-
vidual capacity as Counsel for Defense, his
estate as real parties in interest,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-592-1)

Submitted:   November 29, 2001            Decided:   December 5, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bonnie Lee Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Bonnie Lee Daye appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Daye v. Brannon, No. CA-00-592-1 (M.D.N.C. May

22, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2