Court Opinion

ID: 8507481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 08:07:41.408632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:50:57.205471
License: Public Domain

Walker, J.
This suit is brought by the plaintiffs against John Ryan & Co., contractors, Long and Eiedeldey their sureties, and the city of Cincinnati, for injuries to horses, wagon, and harness, through the want of proper guards to an excavation for a sewer which they were constructing.
Long, one of the sureties, demurs on the grounds of misjoinder of parties, and that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
There is, evidently, a misjoinder, for supposing it to be a case for the application of the maxim of respondeat superior, and that the city was1 the master, and Ryan & Oo. the servant, in the execution of the work, which is the best point of view for the plaintiff’ the master and servant can not both be sued in the same action. Clarke v. Fry, 8 Ohio St. 358.
Long and Eiedeldey were sureties to the city of Cincinnati for the faithful performance of this contract. The plaintiff* is not in privity with the city, and can not in any way, that I can discover, directly avail himself of this bond which is to the city only.
The demurrer will therefore be sustained as to Long and *159Eiedeldey, and the plaintiff may have ten days to elect whether lie will pursue Ryan & Co., or the city, and the other party will then be stricken out.