Court Opinion

ID: 4315173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-25 18:21:40.609461+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:26.308190
License: Public Domain

People v Hueston (2018 NY Slip Op 06190)

People v Hueston

2018 NY Slip Op 06190

Decided on September 25, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 25, 2018

Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

7141 1562/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vKevin Hueston, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert McIver of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond Bruce, J.), rendered October 14, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.