Court Opinion

ID: 1017390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:04:15.094033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:13.043494
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-6255

JIMMY LOCKLEAR,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-936)

Submitted:   September 30, 2005           Decided:   October 21, 2005

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

            Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).

We   have   reviewed   the   record   and   find   no    reversible   error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.      See   Locklear   v.   Stansberry,   No.     CA-04-936   (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 27, 2005).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                    - 2 -