Court Opinion

ID: 5186582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 15:29:26.994778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:46.500702
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam :
This action is upon a promissory note alleged to have been made-by the defendant and delivered to the plaintiff. It is also alleged' .that at maturity the note was presented for payment, and payment ■demanded and ."refused. The demurrer was interposed, because the plaintiff failed in addition to aver subsequent non-payment.. The-demurrer is frivolous. All that was necessary to aver was. a breach of the contract evidenced by the note. It was not necessary to- add that the breach continued down to the time- of the commencement, of the action.
The judgment overruling the demurrer as frivolous was right and should be affirmed, with costs. . ,
. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, Patterson and O’Brien, JJ. .
Judgment, affirmed, with costs.