Court Opinion

ID: 994450
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:23:11.319244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:45.326746
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7421

JIMMY GARFIELD DRIGGERS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

D. SMITH, Warden; M. GILLIGAN, Officer; E. O.
TRENT, Sergeant,

                                           Defendants - Appellees,
          and

KENNY HALL; OFFICER CAMPBELL,

                                                        Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-1169-AM)

Submitted:   February 26, 1998            Decided:   March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Garfield Driggers, Appellant Pro Se. Collin Jefferson Hite,
SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Driggers v. Smith, No. CA-96-1169-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 3,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2