Court Opinion

ID: 9957624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-04 18:00:54.266409+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:30.879505
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40569            Document: 42-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/04/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                   ____________                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 23-40569
                                                                            FILED
                                                                         April 4, 2024
                                  Summary Calendar
                                  ____________                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
United States of America,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Danny Lee Villezcas,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:16-CR-84-1
                   ______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Danny Lee
Villezcas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villezcas has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40569        Document: 42-1        Page: 2    Date Filed: 04/04/2024

                                  No. 23-40569

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.
       There is a clerical error in the revocation order. The order does not
accurately reflect that the district court imposed his 24-month term of
imprisonment to run consecutively with his six-year state sentence.
Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the
revocation order in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.
See United States v. Illies, 805 F.3d 607, 610 (5th Cir. 2015).

                                        2