Court Opinion

ID: 9950094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-13 14:04:48.4076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:51.475615
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                                State of Florida

                         Opinion filed March 13, 2024.
        Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                              No. 3D22-1819
                      Lower Tribunal No. 18-12583 SP

    Envision Physical Therapy, Inc., a/a/o Cromwell Harris,
                                   Appellant,

                                      vs.

                GEICO General Insurance Company,
                                   Appellee.

      An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria
D. Ortiz, Judge.

      Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Chad A. Barr, and Dalton L. Gray
(Altamonte Springs), for appellant.

    Rivkin Radler, LLP, and Kristen L. Wenger, Drew Krieger,
and Salvatore T. Coppolino (Jacksonville), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Less Inst. Physicians, 344

So. 3d 557, 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Because PIP benefits were exhausted

through payment of valid claims and because Less neither pled bad faith,

nor did the trial court make a bad faith determination, USAA has no further

liability on pending claims.”); GEICO Indem. Co. v. Gables Ins. Recovery,

Inc., 159 So. 3d 151, 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“Coral Imaging only applies

where the PIP insurer exhausts benefits by improperly paying untimely

claims.”); Northwoods Sports Med. & Physical Rehab., Inc. v. State Farm

Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 137 So. 3d 1049, 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“Once the

PIP benefits are exhausted through the payment of valid claims, an insurer

has no further liability on unresolved, pending claims, absent bad faith in the

handling of the claim by the insurance company.”); Progressive Select Ins.

Co. v. Dr. Rahat Faderani, DO, MPH, P.A., 330 So. 3d 928, 931 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2021) (“Were we to write on a clean slate, and except for untimely

payments, we would hold that an insurance company's ‘improper’ payments

to another provider do not constitute bad faith sufficient to overcome the

insurance company's exhaustion of benefits defense to a provider who sues

for   payment    after   the    policy       limits   have   been exhausted.”).

                                         2