Court Opinion

ID: 2942734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 01:37:51.952546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:40:55.059164
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                          NO. AP-76,460

                        MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN, Relator

                                                  v.

                 TARRANT COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                         CAUSE NOS. 0222921 & 0201732
                  IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER ONE
                           FROM TARRANT COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                           OPINION

       Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for a writ of habeas corpus in

Criminal District Court Number One of Tarrant County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and

that the applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court.

       On October 6, 2010, we held this mandamus application in abeyance and ordered the Tarrant
                                                                                                       2

County District Clerk to respond. On November 8, 2010, we received a response from Paula Ford,

a deputy district clerk, and copies of orders signed by the trial court and entered on September 1,

2010. These orders state that “Applicant’s three grounds for relief are DESIGNATED pending

disposition” of Ex parte Bohannan, AP-76,363 (filed and set for submission June 16, 2010).

        “Within 20 days of the expiration of the time in which the state is allowed to answer, it shall

be the duty of the convicting court to decide whether there are controverted, previously unresolved

facts material to the legality of the applicant’s confinement.” TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(c). If the trial court decides that there are unresolved facts, “it shall enter an order within 20 days

of the expiration of the time allowed for the state to reply, designating the issues of fact to be

resolved.” TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If no such order is entered within these 20

days, the district clerk has a ministerial duty to forward an applicant’s habeas application(s) to this

Court. Dejean v. Dallas County Dist. Clerk, 259 S.W.3d 183, 184 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

        The orders in Realtor’s cases were entered within the allowable time period, but they did not

designate issues of fact to be resolved. We believe that these orders are not authorized by § 3.

Accordingly, we conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct Respondent, the Tarrant County

District Clerk, to forward Relator’s habeas applications to this Court. This writ of mandamus will

issue only if Respondent fails to comply.

Filed: November 24, 2010
Do not publish