Court Opinion

ID: 9638497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 15:45:02.120631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:06.889436
License: Public Domain

*5DONNELLY, Judge,
concurring.
The garnishment in aid of execution of the judgment in the Circuit Court of Au-drain County does not, in my view, give rise to a “logical nexus between the status asserted and the claim sought to be adjudicated.” Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 102, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 1953, 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968).
However, the interests of Nicole and Kel-ea in being supported clearly are protecti-ble and I would reserve the question whether they may seek in Audrain County a modification of the child support order.
I concur in the result.