Court Opinion

ID: 1005486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:29.337723+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:39.767073
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6976

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

COLLEEN SEXTON,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-97-9, CA-99-840)

Submitted:   October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Colleen Sexton, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Colleen Sexton seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Sexton, Nos. CR-97-9; CA-

99-840 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2001).     We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2