Court Opinion

ID: 1025087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:44:14.754141+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:39.257585
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Curtis A. Beasley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Beasley’s motion was untimely filed.
  
   See
  
  Fed. R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.