Court Opinion

ID: 8910526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 02:48:32.580536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:29.284889
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The opinion heretofore filed, 9 Cir., 600 F.2d 1317, is amended by deleting the following language at page 2573, at the end of the first full paragraph in the right-hand column of the printed slip opinion [600 F.2d at 1322.]:
“Since Cohn’s conversations must be suppressed, his conviction must be reversed for insufficient evidence. Because Cohn cannot be retried (Greene v. Massey (1978) 437 U.S. 19, 98 S.Ct. 2151, 57 L.Ed.2d 15), we need not reach the question whether his right to a speedy trial was violated.”
Footnote 2 is inserted following the words “traffic with Paul Harmon” in the same paragraph.
The text of footnote 2 shall read as follows:
“We have examined Cohn’s speedy trial claim and are satisfied it does not meet the four-part test laid down by the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo (1972) 407 U.S. 514, 530-33, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101.”
The Government’s petition for rehearing is denied.