Court Opinion

ID: 4635646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-24 16:00:33.105626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:58:25.558074
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 19-14951    Date Filed: 11/24/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 19-14951
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00507-WFJ-AEP-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

WILLIAM JONES,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.
                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                           (November 24, 2020)

Before MARTIN, LUCK and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 19-14951      Date Filed: 11/24/2020   Page: 2 of 2

      H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for William Jones in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Jones’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2