Court Opinion

ID: 4147007
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-22 01:01:25.305332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:59.050394
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-20543      Document: 00513882781         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-20543
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID PONCE-GUZMAN,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:15-CR-664-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, David Ponce-Guzman raises
an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d 577
(5th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 1, 2016) (No. 16-5853). In Torres-
Jaime, we held that a Georgia conviction for aggravated assault qualifies as a
crime of violence under U.S.S.G § 2L1.2 (2014). Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d at 580-
85. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.