Court Opinion

ID: 1018033
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:13:50.170732+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:31.560255
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-2030

JOSEPH BLACKBURN, SR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INCORPORATED; LEDERLE,
INCORPORATED,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-65-2)

Submitted: December 15, 2005              Decided: December 20, 2005

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Blackburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tamela Jane White, Craig
A. Komorowski, FARRELL, FARRELL & FARRELL, L.C., Huntington, West
Virginia; Jeff Chandler Woods, JACKSON KELLY, P.L.L.C., Charleston,
West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

               Joseph Blackburn, Sr., appeals a district court judgment

dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and

affirm    for    the    reasons    cited   by    the   district    court.        See

Blackburn v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., No. CA-04-65-2 (N.D.W.

Va. Aug. 24, 2005).            We dispense with oral argument because the

facts    and    legal   contentions     are     adequately   presented      in   the

materials      before    the    court   and     argument   would   not   aid     the

decisional process.

                                                                         AFFIRMED

                                        - 2 -