Court Opinion

ID: 8620964
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 08:39:04.817732+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:30.584696
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Pedro Ochoa Virgen, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ochoa Virgen’s motion to reopen where he did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). See Mendez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 340 F.3d 865, 869-70 (9th Cir.2003) (“prima facie eligibility for the relief sought is a prerequisite for the granting of a motion to reopen”); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (applicant for CAT relief must prove “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.