Court Opinion

ID: 5812414
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:50:16.867082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:53.648052
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judg*1818ment of the Wayne County Court (Stephen R. Sirkin, J.), rendered October 16, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). The contention of defendant that County Court failed to apprehend the extent of its discretion in sentencing him is not supported by the record (see People v Moon, 43 AD3d 1379 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 1036 [2008]; People v Lee, 24 AD3d 1246 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 850 [2006]; cf. People v Schafer, 19 AD3d 1133 [2005]). To the extent that the further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his plea (see People v Barnes, 32 AD3d 1250 [2006]), it “involve[s] matters outside the record on appeal and thus [is] properly raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440” (People v Barnes, 56 AD3d 1171, 1171 [2008]; see People v Graham, 77 AD3d 1439 [2010]). Present — Martoche, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.