Court Opinion

ID: 592416
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:00.654496
License: Public Domain

977 F.2d 572
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Anthony CROWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.R. A. YOUNG;  David A. Garraghty;  L. E. Nelson,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6477.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 24, 1992Decided:  October 20, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Anthony Crowell, Appellant Pro Se.
William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Anthony Crowell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Crowell v. Young, No. CA-91-460-N (E.D. Va.  Apr. 22, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED