Court Opinion

ID: 2961993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:50:59.120544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:13.125266
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          May 25, 1993          [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 93-1152                                              JOSEPH R. GLIDDEN,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]                                          ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                               Selya, Boudin and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ___________________               Perry O'Brian on brief for appellant.               _____________               Jay  P. McCloskey,  United States  Attorney, and  Michael M.               _________________                                 __________          DuBose, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.          ______                                  __________________                                  __________________                      Per  Curiam.    We  have reviewed  the  record  and                      ___________            conclude that the district  court's findings were not clearly            erroneous.   Counsel  adequately  informed appellant  of  the            government's proposed plea offer and of the likely sentencing            benefit of  cooperating with the government.  The judgment is            summarily affirmed pursuant to First Circuit Rule 27.1.                                         -2-