Court Opinion

ID: 660922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:11:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:17.611705
License: Public Domain

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.John D. SIMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY;  Attorney General of the Commonwealth ofVirginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-7128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 11, 1993.Decided Dec. 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.  (CA-92-341-R)
John D. Simpson, appellant pro se.
Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
John D. Simpson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.*  Simpson v. Murray, No. CA-92-341-R (W.D. Va.  Oct. 1, 1992).  We deny Simpson's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
 The district court dismissed the case.  However, summary judgment should have been granted because matters outside the pleadings were considered