Court Opinion

ID: 8031176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:13:04.768195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:58.799892
License: Public Domain

DECISION
On November 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced the Department of Corrections for a commitment of three (3) years, for the offense of Count I: Escape, a Felony. This sentence was ordered to run consecutive to DC-11-0734.
On April 8, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).
The Defendant was present and was represented by Peter Ohman, of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.
Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).
*32Done in open Court this 8th day of April, 2016.
DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016.
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.
Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.