Court Opinion

ID: 1019658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:38:56.599569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:28:21.164202
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 05-7150

MICHAEL R. SHUCK,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN BLEDSOE,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(CA-05-214-7)

Submitted:   May 10, 2006                   Decided:   June 12, 2006

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Shuck, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Michael    R.   Shuck,   a   federal   prisoner,   appeals   the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).     We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.     See Shuck v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-214-7 (W.D. Va.

July 19, 2005).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                   - 2 -