Court Opinion

ID: 8529131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 10:59:22.62659+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:51:43.311132
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Wole
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellant appeared as the purchaser of a piece of property, with a right of redemption in the vendor, before a notary and recited that he had been paid back the purchase price and hence wished to cancel the record. The alleged cancellation was denied by the Registrar of Oaguas on the ground that section 16 of the Mortgage Law required that performance of conditions subsequent or conditions involving rescission should appear by means of a new record.
Appellant maintains that the owner and vendor has disappeared and that he has no other way of ridding himself of the title. We think the purchaser, if he finds it necessary, might perhaps accomplish his purpose by suit, but in any event the provisions of section 16, supra, are manda*973tory and the registrar is not authorized to make an exception. Section 82 of the Mortgage Law allows a cancellation where a right is completely extinguished, but section 16 provides the manner in which records of resolutory conditions are made in the registry and we have no discretion to change the law.
The note must be

Affirmed.

Chief Justice Del Toro and Justices Aldrey, Hutchison and Franco Soto concurred.