Court Opinion

ID: 6937228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:41:19.291544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:32.295895
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant pleaded no contest to sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.425. The court found him guilty, suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for five years. The court found defendant to be sexually dangerous and ordered him to complete a treatment program as one condition of probation. ORS 426.675(3)(a). Defendant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the imposition of that condition.1 We conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the court’s action.
Defendant also challenges a condition of probation requiring that he pay all costs incurred by the state in providing him a defense. No amount was specified. We agree with the state’s concession that the court’s failure to do so was error. ORS 161.665(1); State v. Tompkins, 69 Or App 258, 259, 684 P2d 629 (1984).
Probation condition requiring payment of costs vacated; remanded for reconsideration;2 otherwise affirmed.

 Because defendant was not sentenced, the issues that he raises are reviewable under ORS 138.040. State v. Donovan, 307 Or 461, 770 P2d 581 (1989).

 Before State v. Carmickle, 307 Or 1, 762 P2d 290 (1988), we would have remanded for resentencing.