Court Opinion

ID: 9440686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 17:03:16.393211+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:52.443964
License: Public Domain

PROST, Circuit Judge, with whom GAJARSA, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.
DYK, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Defendants-Appellees, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on March 7, 2011.