Court Opinion

ID: 8453148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:25:08.337566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.521258
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. Scarantino, No. 5:10-cv-00095, 2011 WL 1229994 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.