Court Opinion

ID: 9534171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:37:20.533973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:28.843252
License: Public Domain

Ryan, J.
(concurring). I concur with Justice Levin that the evidence obtained as a result of the electronic participant monitoring in these cases was not obtained unconstitutionally despite the holding in People v Beavers, 393 Mich 554; 227 NW2d 511 (1975), because Beavers, having prospective application only, is inapplicable to these cases.
I am of the view as well that the evidence was not obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States for the reasons announced by Mr. Justice White in his lead opinion in United States v White, 401 US 745, 746; 91 S Ct 1122; 28 L Ed 2d 453 (1971).
For the foregoing reasons alone I concur in the majority’s disposition of these cases.
Coleman, J., concurred with Ryan, J.