Court Opinion

ID: 348329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:04:01+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:38:25.247511
License: Public Domain

560 F.2d 194
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Arturo Valadez TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 77-5234Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 28, 1977.

Amador C. Garcia, Corpus Christi, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
James R. Gough, U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RONEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Trevino appeals from his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (1972).  His sole contention on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction.  We affirm.

2
The appellant was a passenger in a car which was stopped at the permanent Border Patrol checkpoint seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas.  While questioning the driver, the Border Patrol Agent detected the odor of marijuana.  He had probable cause for the search and asked for the key to the trunk, but the driver said he did not have one in his possession.  During the questioning, however, a state game warden standing near the car saw the driver hand Trevino a set of keys, one of which he recognized as a trunk key.  The appellant took the keys and made a downward motion with his hand as though to hide them.  The warden then reached into the car, grabbed the keys, and opened the trunk which contained 141 pounds of marijuana.

3
Trevino's action in surreptitiously taking the key to the car's trunk after the driver had told the Agent he did not have one amply supports the inference that Trevino was aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana.

4
AFFIRMED.

*
 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I