Court Opinion

ID: 9750904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 15:46:25.674153+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:28.414951
License: Public Domain

KING, Associate Judge,
concurring in the result:
Because the possible relevance of the complaint filed by Miles with the Civilian Complaint Review Board was first raised by appellate counsel1 in the brief on appeal, there is nothing in the record relating to the question of whether that complaint might be producible under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Therefore, I do not object either to a remand to permit an appropriate record to be made *891on that point or to a direction to the trial court to appoint new counsel.

. The same counsel also represented appellant in the D.C.Code § 23-110 hearing.