Court Opinion

ID: 858851
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-04-23 19:20:48.070597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:13.624506
License: Public Domain

*154
   
  Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s order denying him a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
  
   *
  
  We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion to place this appeal in abeyance, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v.
  
  Williams, No. 5:03-cr-00004-RLV-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   Although the district court indicated that it entered the order upon motion of the defendant, we note that the court entered the order upon its own motion. Because Williams is not entitled to a sentence reduction, however, we conclude that remand to correct this error would be pointless.