Court Opinion

ID: 2509163
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:01:59.795156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:34:27.240105
License: Public Domain

709 S.E.2d 767 (2011)
289 Ga. 101
BASS
v.
The STATE et al.
No. S11A0158.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
April 18, 2011.
*768 Patrick Bass, pro se.
Robert Nicholas Peterkin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Peter J. Skandalakis, District Attorney, for appellees.
THOMPSON, Justice.
Bass was indicted for aggravated assault and escape prior to conviction. He pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years on probation for the escape charge. Bass filed a petition for habeas corpus raising various claims, including a claim that the sentence for escape was invalid because it was outside the statutory range. The habeas court denied the petition and Bass applied to this Court for a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We granted Bass' application and posed this question: Did the habeas court err in holding that petitioner's sentence of ten years on probation for escape fell within the statutory range?
Because Bass was charged with escape from lawful custody prior to conviction of any offense, the maximum sentence was five years. OCGA § 16-10-52(b)(2). It follows that the sentence imposed on Bass, ten years on probation, was illegal and void. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611(1), 409 S.E.2d 517 (1991) (sentence is void if it imposes punishment the law does not allow). See also Zipperer v. State, 299 Ga.App. 792, 794(2), 683 S.E.2d 865 (2009) (because an illegal sentence is tantamount to no sentence, a defendant's acquiescence to such a sentence, either through plea negotiations or a failure to object, cannot render the sentence valid). The habeas court erred in failing to rule accordingly.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.