Court Opinion

ID: 2691028
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:57:29.568682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:02.506452
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm., 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-4895.]

     THE STATE EX REL. DAIMLER CHRYSLER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL
                     COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
              [Cite as State ex rel. Daimler Chrysler v. Indus. Comm.,
                        130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-4895.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
  (No. 2009-2058—Submitted August 8, 2011—Decided September 28, 2011.)
              APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,
                           No. 08AP-1017, 2009-Ohio-5778.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Larrimer and Larrimer and Thomas L. Reitz, for appellant.
        Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A., David C. Korte, Michelle D. Bach, and Joshua
R. Lounsbury, for appellee Daimler Chrysler Corp.
        Mike DeWine, Attorney General, and LaTawnda Moore, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
                               ______________________