Court Opinion

ID: 7803207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-24 18:00:32.81924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:29:35.948257
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10184      Document: 00516445510         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/24/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                      August 24, 2022
                                  No. 22-10184
                                Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Ruben Vences-Enciso,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:21-CR-149-5

   Before Davis, Smith, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Vences-Enciso has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Vences-Enciso has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10184     Document: 00516445510          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/24/2022

                                   No. 22-10184

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2