Court Opinion

ID: 2741531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-10 15:01:27.720562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:01:13.748711
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
           ______________________

           PHIL-INSUL CORP.,
      doing business as IntegraSpec,
            Plaintiff-Appellant,

                      v.

    REWARD WALL SYSTEMS, INC.,
         Defendant-Appellee,

                    AND

      NUDURA CORPORATION AND
        POLYFORM A.G.P INC.,
       Defendants-Cross-Appellants,

                    AND

 BUILDBLOCK BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC,
          Defendant-Appellee,

                    AND

         AMVIC CORPORATION,
            Defendant-Appellee.
          ______________________

              2014-1078, -1098
           ______________________
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District of Nebraska in No. 8:12-CV-00091, Chief Judge
Joseph F. Bataillon.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    PAUL ADAMS, The Adams Law Firm, of Albuquerque,
New Mexico, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on
the brief were MICHAEL T. COOKE and BRETT M. PINKUS,
Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas.

    RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Min-
neapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-cross-
appellants Nudura Corporation, et al. With her on the
brief were CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, AARON M.
JOHNSON, and KATHERINE E. MULLER.

   KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI, Brinks Gilson & Lione, of
Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Amvic
Corporation. With her on the brief was JAMES ROBERT
SOBIERAJ.

    MICHAEL R. ANNIS, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Lou-
is, Missouri, for defendant-appellee Reward Wall Sys-
tems, Inc. Of counsel was ANDREW RICHARD GILFOIL. On
the brief for defendant-appellee Buildblock Building
Systems, LLC, were DAVID M. SULLIVAN and HARVEY D.
ELLIS, JR, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. Of counsel was TYNIA A. WATSON.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
    PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO,
Circuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 10, 2014               /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court