Court Opinion

ID: 9443108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:11:14.514637+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:22.585778
License: Public Domain

MILLER, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
The respondent has filed a motion in this court under the provisions of Section 10 (e) of the Act, Section 160 (e), Title 29 U.S.C.A. for leave to adduce additional evidence as to compliance by the Union with Sections 9(f), (g) and (h) of the Labor Management Relations Act, Sections 159(f), (g) and (h), Title 29 U.S.C.A., which motion is supported by the affidavit of the employee relations representative of the respondent.
A similar motion was filed before the Board and denied by it. The Board held that the motion lacked specificity, did not contain a showing sufficient to warrant reopening the record, and that no satisfactory explanation was given for not having offered the evidence at the time of the original hearing. The supporting affidavit for the present motion meets those objections. I am of the opinion that the motion, should be now sustained and such evidence considered before the case is finally disposed of. N. L. R. B. v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, 63 S.Ct. 394, 87 L.Ed. 579.