Court Opinion

ID: 9353463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-11 21:00:21.146386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:29.323001
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1907      Doc: 17         Filed: 01/10/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 21-1907

        MARIO E. CASTRO; MAGDALENA CASTRO,

                             Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                      v.

        BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; CHARLES W. SCHARF; AKERMAN LLP;
        NATSAYI MAWERE; JOSEPH DEFAZIO; NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint
        Mortgage Servicing; JACK NAVARRO; REAL TIME SOLUTIONS; ERIC C.
        GREEN; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; BRIAN MOYNIHAN,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00264-MOC-DSC)

        Submitted: December 30, 2022                                      Decided: January 10, 2023

        Before HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Mario E. Castro, Magdalena Castro, Appellants Pro Se. Bryan G. Scott, AKERMAN LLP,
        Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1907      Doc: 17         Filed: 01/10/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Mario and Magdalena Castro appeal the district court’s order denying for lack of

        jurisdiction, or, alternatively, denying on the merits, their motion for relief from judgment

        under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Castro v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, No. 3:20-

        cv-00264-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. July 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2