Court Opinion

ID: 6444397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:20:08.206048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:52:43.163722
License: Public Domain

Ltjmmus, J.
These are actions upon policies of life insurance issued by the several defendants to the plaintiff. The policies provided for payments to the insured each month upon due proof that the insured, as the result of bodily injury or disease originating after the issuance of the policies, had become totally and permanently disabled so as to be prevented from engaging in any occupation and performing any work for compensation or profit, and that such disability had already continued uninterruptedly for a period of at least three months.
In the Metropolitan case the defendant voluntarily made monthly payments until August 19, 1939, and in the Mutual case the defendant did so until May 4, 1939. These actions are brought to recover monthly payments falling due thereafter. It was found that the plaintiff had had tuberculosis, but that the disease had been arrested before the time when the monthly payments claimed in the declarations were to begin. The plaintiff was then and thereafter able to do light work, and to act as the keeper of a grocery store and to earn a living at that occupation.
.“A disability is total within the terms of . . . [these contracts] of insurance if it renders the insured wholly and continuously incapable of performing remunerative work of a substantial and not merely of a trifling character, or prevents him from pursuing to a substantial degree any gainful occupation as a means of livelihood.” Azevedo v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. 308 Mass. 216, 219. Within this definition, the plaintiff had no total disability.
It is unnecessary to discuss the requests for rulings, for the facts found demonstrate that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. In each case the entry will be

Order of Appellate Division ordering judgment for defendant affirmed.