Court Opinion

ID: 1010325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:10:06.473954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:08.672559
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 03-6241

GEORGE STOKES,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, a/k/a Joseph Curran,
Jr.,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-2432-PJM)

Submitted:   April 17, 2003                 Decided:   April 24, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Stokes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     George Stokes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Stokes has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.     See Stokes v. Peguese,

No. CA-02-2432-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2003).   Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                2