Court Opinion

ID: 9516456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:42:52.16034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:19.310503
License: Public Domain

FINE, J.
{dissenting). Although I agree that the definition of "unit" in § 703.02(15), STATS., encompasses condominium property on which there has been no construction, I dissent because the condominium agreement does not shield the fifteen units owned by Aluminum Industries from the assessment required by § 703.16(2), STATS. Indeed, as the majority recognizes, the agreement burdens each unit with "l/105th" of the costs attributable to the common areas. Majority op. at 590. Yet, under the majority's analysis, fourteen percent (15 105) of those costs cannot be collected from anyone. This is a bizarre result and is contrary to both the language and the obvious intent of the condominium agreement.