Court Opinion

ID: 5120439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-22 16:07:56.310929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:17.750498
License: Public Domain

KEY, Associate Justice.
Fred Emerson brought this suit against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company and four other railroad companies, to recover damages on account of alleged injuries and overcharges in freight in the transportation of certain live stock from Mount Sterling, Kentucky, to McKinney, Texas.
It was alleged in plaintiff’s petition that the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company was a corporation incorporated under the laws of Kentucky, and had its office and place of business at Louisville, Kentucky. No citation was served on the defendant, or any of its agents in this State, but a notice was issued and served upon it in the State of Kentucky, in conformity with articles 1230 to 1233 of the Revised Statutes. That defendant filed no answer.
By agreement between the plaintiff and all the other defendants, the plaintiff took judgment against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, and dismissed his suit as against all the other defendants, except the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, against which defendant judgment was rendered for $200,
*297The last named defendant has brought the case to this court by writ of error, and seeks a reversal upon the ground that the notice served upon it in the State of Kentucky was ineffectual to confer jurisdiction authorizing a personal judgment against it. We sustain that contention. That defendant being a nonresident, and not having been served with citation within the limits of this State, and not having filed an answer, the court below had no jurisdiction to render a personal judgment against it. (Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S., 565; Wilson v. Seligman, 144 U. S., 45; York v. State, 73 Texas, 640; Maddox v. Craig, 80 Texas, 600.) The rule referred to is applicable to a nonresident corporation as well as a nonresident individual. (Mexican Central Ry. Co. v. Pinkney, 149 U. S., 194; Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Koonts, 104 U. S., 643.)
The averment in the petition that the -defendant did business within this State, and had contracted to deliver the property in the county where the suit was brought, did not authorize the service of process outside of the State of Texas. As between the plaintiff Fred Emerson and the Louisville & Nashville-Railroad Company, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded; but as between the other parties, and in all other respects, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed in part, and in part reversed and remanded.