Court Opinion

ID: 7777685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:05:51.354123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:42.695791
License: Public Domain

I concur in Parts I through VIII of the main opinion and I concur in the result reached in the opinion. I do not, however, agree with the rationale in Part IX. As I understand the main opinion, the trial court is directed to vacate its rulings on the two discovery motions and to reconsider Jackson's discovery requests in light of the applicable law cited in the opinion and by applying the appropriate "good cause" standard discussed inEx parte Land, 775 So.2d 847 (Ala. 2000), and Ex parte Mack,894 So.2d 764 (Ala.Crim.App. 2003).