Court Opinion

ID: 5803942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:33:28.04059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:39.955848
License: Public Domain

In an action on a promissory note in which plaintiff moved for summary judgment in lieu of the service of a complaint, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 15, 1975, as, upon reargument, (a) granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (b) denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) the judgment entered thereon on April 28, 1975. Judgment and order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly granted summary judgment. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Christ, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.