Court Opinion

ID: 3176719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-11 16:06:23.645606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:09.803405
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

          PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.,
                   Appellant

                           v.

     SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
                    Appellee
             ______________________

                      2015-1632
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-
00473.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C.,
Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by
DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO
MUKHERJI, Boston, MA.

    JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago,
IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN
EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA
Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA.
                ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH,
Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2016                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court