Court Opinion

ID: 1441460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:10:37.840697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:07:44.933775
License: Public Domain

235 S.W.3d 598 (2007)
Terrye MARTIN, Movant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 89123.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
October 16, 2007.
Timothy Joseph Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Karen Louise Kramer, co-counsel, Dora A. Fichter, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and NANNETTE A BAKER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Terrye Martin appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion for ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).