Court Opinion

ID: 7527652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:05:40.356964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:39.694775
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
In view of the state’s affidavits filed below in this case and in the absence of the state’s concessions as made in Endress v. Coe, 433 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we cannot say that the result reached by the circuit judge herein conflicts with Endress, supra, or otherwise departs from the essen*244tial requirements of law. Therefore, this petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.