Court Opinion

ID: 6870333
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 21:00:09.978848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:23.738511
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.