Court Opinion

ID: 4445126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-08 19:00:27.790062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:51.361634
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-13812   Date Filed: 10/08/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-13812
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00434-AKK-JEO-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JOSE CERVANTEZ GALLEGOS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Alabama
                      ________________________

                            (October 8, 2019)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-13812    Date Filed: 10/08/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      John Douglas Lloyd, appointed counsel for Jose Gallegos in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Gallegos’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2