Court Opinion

ID: 8477133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:25:31.184487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:27.206872
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony A. Blagrove appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blagrove, No. 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 24, 2009). We further deny Blagrove’s motion for documents in his brother’s district court case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.