Court Opinion

ID: 9533346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:30:49.087184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:01.499609
License: Public Domain

*1154GARRARD, Judge,
concurring.
I concur with the majority concerning issue I.
Accordingly, it is not necessary to decide issue II, although the propriety of an instruction concerning invitee-licensee status is likely to recur on retrial. I believe such an instruction correctly stating the law is appropriate if the facts in evidence establish a genuine issue as to Wesolek’s status at the time. I do not agree with the majority’s assertion that whether Wesolek made a purchase before her fall is “crucial to the determination,” although it is certainly significant evidence.
I therefore concur in the result reached.