Court Opinion

ID: 4418116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-18 20:00:28.109031+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:10.737248
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUL 18 2019
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    18-30064

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00093-TMB-1

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
SANTOS LOPEZ,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Alaska
                  Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted July 15, 2019**

Before:      SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

      Santos Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty-plea convictions and 46-month concurrent sentences for four counts of drug

distribution, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

We have provided Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                  18-30064