Court Opinion

ID: 571776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:14:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:15.119005
License: Public Domain

948 F.2d 1283
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Clayton BELL, a/k/a Buddy Bell, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7605.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 1991.Decided Nov. 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville.   Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.  (CR-88-54-3)
James Clayton Bell, appellant pro se.
Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
James Clayton Bell appeals from the district court's order denying Bell's Motion for a New Trial.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Bell, No. CR-88-54-3 (E.D.N.C. May 24, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.