Court Opinion

ID: 677500
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:23:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:22.243929
License: Public Domain

34 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Robert Lee HOOD, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Charles HILL;  Officer Edward;  Officer Cherry, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 1994Decided Aug. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.  (CA-94-100)
Robert Lee Hood, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Hood v. Hill, No. CA-94-100 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED