Court Opinion

ID: 70719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 07:06:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:09.089231
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Plaintiff-Appellant Bernard Dolenz, Trustee, proceeding pro se, appeals from the Amended Final Judgment of the district court filed June 30, 2009. Our painstaking review of the extensive record on appeal in this case, and of the facts and law as set forth in the briefs of the parties, satisfies us that the district court’s judgment is, in all respects, correct and fully supported by the applicable law, and that the myriad claims and assertions of Plaintiff-Appellant Dolenz are wholly lacking in merit, to the point of frivolousness and approaching sanctionability. Therefore, for essentially the same reasons expressed by the district court, its Amended Final Judgment, and all other rulings and orders of which Plaintiff-Appellant complains, are
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.