Court Opinion

ID: 8422772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 22:57:20.859363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:26.392677
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
David Elijah Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-93-16 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED