Court Opinion

ID: 4128959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:45:13.015335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:33.817294
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                                 GREG         ABBOTT

                                                     January 152004

The Honorable Ray Montgomery                                   Opinion No. GA-01 36
Leon County District Attorney
Post Office Drawer 1010                                        Re: Whether a company in which the Leon County
Centerville, Texas 75833                                       Judge has a substantial interest may sell fuel and
                                                               oil products to the county (RQ-0084-GA)

Dear Mr. Montgomery:

        On behalf of the Leon County Auditor (the “Auditor”), you ask whether a company in which
the Leon County Judge has a substantial interest may sell fuel and oil products to Leon County (the
“County’).’

        The Auditor has informed you that Ryder Oil, a company in which County Judge Byron
Ryder owns a substantial interest, wishes to sell fuel and oil products to the County.* An outside
auditor, whom the commissioners court hired to audit all county offices, has requested that the
County seek an attorney general opinion on the legality of these sales. See Request Letter, supra

         ‘See Letter from Honorable Ray Montgomery, Leon County District Attorney, to Nancy Fuller, Chair, Opinion
Committee, Office of the Attorney General (July 23, 2003) ( on f 11e with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Request
Letter].

            2See Letter from Susan Pugh, Leon County Auditor, to Honorable Ray Montgomery, Leon County                  District
Attorney (July 22, 2003) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter County Auditor’s Letter]; Leon                   County
Commissioners Court minutes 8 (Jan. 13,2003) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Commissioners                Court’s
Minutes]; Affidavit by Byron Ryder (Jan. 27, 2003) (on file with Opinion Comrnittee) [hereinafter Judge                 Ryder’s
Affidavit].

           Whether Judge Ryder “owns a substantial interest” in Ryder Oil for purposes of chapter 17 1, Local Government
Code, is a question requiring the resolution of fact questions, and it therefore cannot be determined in the opinion
process. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0003 (2002) at 1 (stating generally that the opinion process does not determine
facts); Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. DM-259 (1993) at 10 (stating that whether, for purposes of chapter 171, an appraisal
district board member has a substantial interest in a business entity is a fact question that cannot be determined in the
opinion process). The commissioners court’s meeting minutes reflect Judge Ryder’s statements that “he has basically
turned Ryder Oil over to his sons.” Commissioners Court’s Minutes, supra, at 8. Nevertheless, “[a] local public official
is considered to have a substantial interest [for purposes of chapter 17 l] if the official’s child “has a substantial interest.”
TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODEANN. 8 171.002(c) (Vernon 1999); see also TEX. GOV’T CODEANN. § 573.023(c)( 1) (Vernon
1994). In addition, Judge Ryder affirms in his affidavit that he “own[s] a substantial business interest, (as that term is
defined in [section] 17 1.002, Texas Local Government Code), in RYDER OIL COMPANY.” Judge Ryder’s Affidavit,
supra, at 1.
The Honorable Ray Montgomery          - Page 2          (GA-0136)

note 1, at 1; County Auditor’s Letter, supra note 2, at 1. The County Auditor cites as particularly
relevant sections 8 1.002 and 17 1.002 of the Local Government Code. See County Auditor’s Letter,
supra note 2, at 1.

         Section 81.002 provides the official oath to which a county judge must subscribe before
undertaking official public duties. See TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 81.002(a) (Vernon Supp.
2004). In accordance with that section, an incoming county judge “must take the official oath and
swear in writing that [he or she] will not be interested, directly or indirectly, in a contract with . . .
the county except: (1) a contract . . . expressly authorized by law . . . .” Id. “Subject to . . . [clhapter
17 1,” however, a county judge “may serve as a member of the governing body of or as an officer or
director of an entity that does business with the county, excluding a publicly traded corporation or
a subsidiary, affiliate, or subdivision of a publicly traded corporation.” Id. 8 81.002(c).

         Chapter 17 1 regulates a local public official’s conflicts of interest. See id. 5 17 1.004 (Vernon
1999). Section 171.004 requires a local public official with a substantial interest in a business entity
to file with the governmental entity’s official record keeper “an affidavit stating the nature and extent
of the interest” before the governmental entity votes on or decides a matter involving the business
entity. Id. 6 17 1.004(a)-(b); see also id. 8 171.001(2) (defining the term “business entity”). In
general, the official further must abstain from participating in the matter if “the action . . . will have
a special economic effect on the business entity that is distinguishable from the effect on the public.”
Id. 5 171.004(a)( 1). But see id. 8 171.004(c) (stating that a local public official need not abstain
from participating in a matter requiring an affidavit if a majority of the governmental entity’s
members “are likewise required to file and . . . do file affidavits” on the same matter). The term
“local public official” is defined for purposes of chapter 171 to include a county officer, such as a
county judge. See id. 5 171 .OOl( 1). A local public official has a “substantial interest in a business
entity” in three circumstances:

                                (1) the person owns [ten] percent or more of
                        the voting stock or shares of the business entity or
                        owns either [ten] percent or more or $15,000 or more
                        of the fair market value of the business entity; or

                                (2) funds received by the person from the
                        business entity exceed [ten] percent of the person’s
                        gross income for the previous year.

                         (c) A local public official is considered to have a substantial
                interest under this section if a person related to the official in the first
                degree by consanguinity or affinity, as determined under [clhapter
                573, Government Code, has a substantial interest under this section.

Id. 8 171.002(a). An officer’s failure to comply with section 171.004 may result in the action being
declared voidable if the action would not have been taken without that officer’s vote.        See id.
0 171.006.
The Honorable Ray Montgomery        - Page 3         (GA-0136)

       Consistently   with the statutory directive to harmonize  statutes if possible, see TEX. GOV’T
CODEANN. 9 3 11.025(a) (Vernon 1998)’ this office has harmonized       section 81.002 and chapter 171
“by reading chapter 171 to authorize a commissioners court to enter into contracts or take actions
in which the county judge . . . has a financial interest ‘to the same extent that other local
governmental bodies may take such actions.“’ Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0090 (2003) at 3
(quoting Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. DM-279 (1993) at 4); accord Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. Nos. JC-0121
(1999) at 2, JC-0061 (1999) at 2-3. Section 8 1.002, by itself, absolutely prohibits a county judge
from having any interest in a county contract, whereas chapter 17 1 permits a county commissioners
court to take an action affecting a business entity in which the county judge has a financial interest
if the judge complies with section 171.004, and even if the judge does not comply, the
commissioners court’s action is only voidable. See TEX.LOC. GOV’T CODEANN. 5 171.006 (Vernon
1999); Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0090 (2003) at 3. As harmonized, a county judge who has a
substantial interest in a business entity that will be affected by a commissioners court’s vote or
decision must comply with section 171.004. Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0090 (2003) at 3 (quoting
TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 17 l.O04(a)( 1) (Vernon 1999)).

         Because Judge Ryder has a substantial interest in Ryder Oil Company, the company may sell
fuel or oil products to the County only if he has filed an affidavit “stating the nature and extent of’
his interest in the company and abstains from deliberating or voting on any matter that will “have
a special economic effect [on the company,] . . . distinguishable from the effect on the public.” Y&X.
LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. 0 171.004(a)( 1) (Vernon 1999). If the county is considering whether to
purchase fuel or oil products from Ryder Oil Company, the decision will, as a matter of law, “have
a special economic effect on the [corporation] that is distinguishable from the effect on the public.”
Id.; see Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. DM-279 (1993) at 7 (determining that a county’s decision to buy
materials from a corporation in which a commissioner has a substantial interest will “as a matter of
law, ‘have a special economic effect on the’ corporation”) (quoting TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN.
9 171.004(a)(l)).
The Honorable Ray Montgomery        - Page 4         (GA-0136)

                                        SUMMARY

                        A business entity in which the Leon County Judge owns a
               substantial interest may sell fuel or oil products to the County only if,
               in accordance with section 17 1.004 of the Local Governrnent Code,
               the judge has filed an affidavit “stating the nature and extent of’ his
               interest in the company and abstains from participating             in a
               deliberation or vote on any matter that will “have a special economic
               effect [on the company,] . . . distinguishable from its effect on the
               public.” T EX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 171.004(a)( 1) (Vernon
               1999).

BARRY R. MCBEE
First Assistant Attorney General

DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee

Kymberly K. Oltrogge
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee