Court Opinion

ID: 7102958
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:17:37.187139+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:28.311221
License: Public Domain

Adams, Ch. J.
The case comes to us upon a certificate. It is not necessary to set out the certificate verbatim. The action was brought without filing a petition, and the notice claimed damages for the property “ burned by fire from an engine of the company,” and without the words “ by reason of the negligence of the company,” or words equivalent thereto. The question certified is as to whether it is necessary to aver the negligence of the company as a ground of recovery in such case. In answer to such question, we have to say that we do not think that such averment is necessary. The action is brought under a statute which provides that any corporation operating a railway shall be liable for all damages by fire that is set out or caused by operating of any such railway. (Code, § 1289.) -Under the ruling in Small v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R'y Co., 50 Iowa, 341, the negligence of the company is presumed if the fire proceeded from one of its engines, and it is not necessary for the plaintiff in the fh'st instance to prove more than the fact that it did so proceed. We think that the averments need not be greater than the required proof.
Reversed.