Court Opinion

ID: 5245359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 17:57:25.437904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:51.480957
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam :
1. The power of the Governor to appoint extraordinary terms of the Supreme Court is well settled. (Judiciary Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 30; Laws of 1909, chap. 35], § 153; People v. Gillette, 191 N. Y. 107; People v. Neff, Id. 210.)
2. We cannot say that there was no public interest to justify such appointment, even if that question is open for our consideration, which we need not decide.
3. The Governor has not the power, and it was not intended by his proclamation, to limit the power of the Supreme Court, and whether the motions for new trials in the actions therein referred to may be heard at said term, and, in the event of new trials, whether the issues may be tried thereat, are questions for the judiciary, and should, in the first instance, be determined at Special or Trial Term and not by the Appellate Division upon the application for a writ of prohibition. (People ex rel. Ballin v. Smith, 184 N. Y. 96; People ex rel. Whitman v. Woodward, 150 App. Div. 770.)
All concurred.
Application for writ of prohibition denied.