Court Opinion

ID: 3770857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:23:26.395369+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:12:29.568683
License: Public Domain

{¶ 45} I concur with the majority position with respect to en banc, as stated in my separate concurring and dissenting opinion in State v. Lett, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84707 and 84729.
 {¶ 46} I concur with the majority decision to affirm Atkins-Boozer's sentence, but respectfully dissent from the analysis. Instead, I concur with the analysis of Judge James J. Sweeney with regard to the application of Apprendi, Blakely and Booker to the Ohio sentencing format.