Court Opinion

ID: 9366882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-29 08:11:53.459045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:55.749387
License: Public Domain

Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2023.

                                      In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-22-00801-CR

                          JESSE CHAVEZ, Appellant

                                        V.
                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Cause Nos. 1606246

                 MEMORANDUM                      OPINION

      Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years
of age and sentenced to a twenty-year term of incarceration on August 10, 2022.
Appellant has appealed from his judgment of conviction in cause number 14-22-
00605-CR, which remains pending before this court. This appeal, however, is from
an order denying appellant’s motion for new trial, signed October 21, 2022. That
order is not itself appealable. See Hernandez v. State, No. 03-11-00673-CR, 2012
WL 254606, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not
designated for publication) (collecting cases and acknowledging the court “ha[s]
found no constitutional or statutory provision granting Texas courts of appeals
jurisdiction over a trial court’s post-judgment ruling denying a motion for new
trial”). Nguyen v. State, No. 14-11-00545-CR, 2011 WL 2650737, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 7, 2011, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not
designated for publication) (“An appeal from the denial of a motion for new trial,
separate and apart from an appeal from the conviction, is . . . improper.”).

      On December 20, 2022 the parties were notified that the court would consider
dismissal of the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant demonstrated that
the court has jurisdiction. Appellant has filed no response.

      Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                          2