Court Opinion

ID: 5410881
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:08:55.667114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:47.677466
License: Public Domain

Gildersleeve, J.
These actions were tried together. The first is for personal injuries to the plaintiff, and the second is by the husband for consequential damages alleged to have resulted to him from the injury to bis wife, The jury found *214for defendant in each case, and the plaintiff in each case appeals. The plaintiff wife testified that, when she was attempting to get on- to the car, which was stationary, the conductor rang the hell, the car started up and she was thrown to the ground and injured. Plaintiff’s sister, a witness to the accident, while differing in some unimportant details from plaintiff, substantially corroborated her in all the essential features of the accident. Dr. Pine E. Bush testified to being called shortly after the accident to give medical aid to plaintiff, and states the nature of her injuries, which seem to have been severe. There is nothing inherently improbable in this testimony; and it is absolutely unimpeached, save by such inferences as may be drawn from the fact that no report of the accident was ever made to defendant by its' conductor and motorman, and that plaintiff made no complaint until ninety-eight days after the accident. 3STo witnesses to the accident were called by defendant.
It seems to us that the judgment in each case is against the evidence, and must be reversed.
Judgment in each case reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
Seabury and Platzek, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.