Court Opinion

ID: 4223057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-22 16:07:57.008709+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:56.943309
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                                FOURTH DISTRICT

                                TYLER MOOK,
                                  Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,
                                Appellee.

                                No. 4D16-2179

                           [November 22, 2017]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-
001493CF10A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

  Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T.
Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

    We affirm appellant’s conviction for attempted second degree murder.
We reverse the award of costs to the state for bringing two witnesses from
Tennessee to testify at appellant’s sentencing.          The circuit court
determined that the witnesses’ proposed testimony was inadmissible and
did not permit them to testify. The award of costs was an abuse of
discretion because the costs were not “reasonably and necessarily related
to the prosecution of the crime for which appellant was convicted.” Diodato
v. State, 150 So. 3d 867, 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Leyritz v. State,
93 So. 3d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)); see also § 938.27(1), Fla. Stat.
(2015).

   Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

                            *            *        *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               2