Court Opinion

ID: 4093202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-27 06:17:48.305375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:54.967751
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion Filed October 21, 2016

                                        S   In The
                                Court of Appeals
                         Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                     No. 05-11-01389-CV

               ROBERT WEBB AND RKW FAMILY FARM, LP, Appellants
                                    V.
                ERIC TOMBAUGH AND DENISE TOMBAUGH, Appellees

                       On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court
                                    Collin County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. 296-01080-2011

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION
                  Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang, and Justice Brown
                                Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
       Robert Webb and RKW Family Farm, LP appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their

breach of restrictive covenant suit against Eric and Denise Tombaugh and imposing sanctions on

Webb. Webb and RKW contend the trial court erroneously concluded they lacked standing to

sue, and Webb further asserts the imposition of sanctions was an abuse of discretion. The

Tombaughs respond the appeal is without merit and request Webb be sanctioned further for

filing a frivolous appeal. We affirm the trial court’s order and deny the Tombaughs’ request for

appellate sanctions.

                                       BACKGROUND

       This suit stems from the construction of an “outbuilding” by the Tombaughs on their

property, located in Glenbrook Estates, a subdivision subject to the “Declaration of Covenants
and Assessments for Glenbrook Estates” and mandatory membership in the Glenbrook Owners’

Association. At the time construction began in 2007, Webb owned the adjoining property; at the

time suit was filed in 2011, RKW owned that property.

        In their suit, Webb and RKW alleged the outbuilding violated certain covenants in the

Declaration. Webb, suing as the owner of the adjoining property at the time construction of the

outbuilding began, and RKW, suing as the current owner of the adjoining property, alleged the

violations constituted “irreparable harm.” As relief, they sought removal of the outbuilding, civil

damages under Texas Property Code section 202.004(c), attorney’s fees, and costs.

        The Tombaughs answered the suit asserting, in part, res judicata as an affirmative

defense. According to the Tombaughs, Webb had previously filed a similar suit and “lost.” The

Tombaughs also filed a plea to the jurisdiction seeking dismissal of the suit, alleging Webb and

RKW lacked standing to bring the suit because (1) section 202.004 of the property code

conferred standing to sue to enforce a restrictive covenant only on property owners’ associations

or representatives designated by property owners; and (2) under the Declaration, Webb and

RKW designated the Glenbrook Owners’ Association as their representative to enforce the

covenants. Additionally, the Tombaughs asserted Webb lacked standing because he no longer

owned the property adjoining theirs.

        The trial court granted the Tombaughs’ plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed Webb and

RKW’s claims in their entirety. Subsequently, on the Tombaughs’ post-judgment motion and

following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court assessed sanctions against Webb in the amount

of $19,250. In assessing sanctions, the trial court found Webb’s claim was groundless, filed in

bad faith, and brought for an improper purpose and for the purpose of harassment. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 10.001, 10.004 (West 2002); TEX. R. CIV. P. 13. In relevant part,

the trial court also found:

                                               –2–
       •This suit was filed shortly before the trial setting in Cause No. 219-0059106, a
       matter in which Denise Tombaugh was identified and scheduled to be a witness
       adverse to Robert Webb.

       •Webb admits he is not the record owner of any property within the boundaries of
       the Glenbrook Owners’ Association, and was not at the time of filing this suit.
       Webb lacks any standing to bring the claims he has asserted against the
       Tombaughs.

       •This is not the first time Webb has brought suit against Denise Tombaugh.
       Webb previously joined in a suit against Ms. Tombaugh and others in Cause No.
       219-00025-2008. The claims in the present suit are substantially similar to the
       claims made in Cause No. 219-00025-2008, and the present claims should have
       been brought in the prior suit.

                                            DISCUSSION

       We begin with Webb’s challenge to the sanctions order. We review such an order for an

abuse of discretion. See Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d 609, 614 (Tex. 2007). This standard of

review presumes a trial judge acted within his discretion and places the burden on the appellant

to bring a reporter’s record affirmatively showing an abuse of discretion. See Willms v. Ams.

Tire Co., Inc., 190 S.W.3d 796, 803 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, pet. denied); Marion v. Davis,

106 S.W.3d 860, 869 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, pet. denied). Without a reporter’s record, an

appellate court cannot determine if an abuse of discretion occurred. Willms, 190 S.W.3d at 803.

       Although Webb bore the burden of bringing the record of the sanctions hearing, he failed

to do so. Accordingly, we must presume the trial court’s findings in support of the award of

sanctions are supported by sufficient evidence, and those findings stand. See id. We decide

Webb’s second issue against him.

       In light of the binding findings of res judicata, we need not address Webb and RKW’s

first issue regarding standing. See Tex. Parks & Wildlife Dept. v. EE. Lowrey Realty, Ltd., 235

S.W.692, 694 (Tex. 2007) (dismissal rather than remand appropriate where remand would serve

no legitimate purpose). We deny the Tombaughs’ request for appellate sanctions.

                                              –3–
      Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Webb’s and RKW’s claims and

imposing sanctions on Webb.

                                                 /Carolyn Wright/
                                                 CAROLYN WRIGHT
                                                 CHIEF JUSTICE

111389F.P05

                                           –4–
                                     S
                              Court of Appeals
                       Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                     JUDGMENT

ROBERT WEBB AND RKW FAMILY                     On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District
FARM, LP, Appellants                           Court, Collin County, Texas
                                               Trial Court Cause No. 296-0180-2011.
No. 05-11-01389-CV       V.                    Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
                                               Justices Lang and Brown participating.
ERIC TOMBAUGH AND DENISE
TOMBAUGH, Appellees

      In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s
judgment.

       We ORDER appellees Eric Tombaugh and Denise Tombaugh recover their costs of this
appeal from appellants Robert Webb and RKW Family Farm, L.P.

Judgment entered October 21, 2016.

                                         –5–