Court Opinion

ID: 546617
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:31.503088
License: Public Domain

911 F.2d 726Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Ernest WIDENER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Paul J. DAVIS, Maceo Williams, Mrs. Ray, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6024.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 28, 1990.Decided July 31, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-2038-HM)
Ernest Widener, appellant pro se.
George Albert Eichhorn, III, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Ernest Widener appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Widener v. Davis, C/A No. 89-2038-HM (D.Md. Jan. 8, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.