Court Opinion

ID: 3099223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:56:44.722393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:24:25.059208
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00621-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ELVA PEREZ,                                                                  Appellant,

                                           v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
AS TRUSTEE UNDER NOVASTAR MORTGAGE
FUNDING TRUST, SERIES 2002-2,                       Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 103rd District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      The appellant's brief in the above cause was originally due on April 4, 2011. On

August 18, 2011, this Court ordered the appellate brief to be filed on or before September

19, 2011. The order notified counsel that no further extensions would be granted and
that if the brief was not filed, the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution

under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless appellant reasonably

explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's

failure to timely file a brief.

        Appellant has failed to file her brief or otherwise respond. Accordingly, the appeal

is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
3rd day of November, 2011.

                                             2