Court Opinion

ID: 2889797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 20:53:10.653119+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:34.650530
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-03-0273-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL D

                                  NOVEMBER 23, 2004

                          ______________________________

                        JONATHAN LEE FLORES, APPELLANT

                                             V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

                   NO. 45,924-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

                         _______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

                              ABATEMENT AND REMAND

       Appellant Jonathan Lee Flores challenges his conviction for arson and ten-year

sentence. The appellate record, appellant’s brief, and the State’s brief have all been filed.

On July 7, 2004, this Court abated this appeal and remanded the cause to determine

whether attorney Ronald T. Spriggs should be permitted to withdraw. Following a hearing,
the trial court granted the motion to withdraw and appointed attorney Gerald D. McDougal

to represent appellant. By letter, Mr. McDougal indicated to this Court that due to the

status of the appeal, no further briefing was necessary. Upon suggestion of death of

appellant’s attorney, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.

       Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given

and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

       1. whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; and
       2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to new appointed counsel.

The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant does want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also

take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of

counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel

shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. The trial court shall execute findings

of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a

supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included

in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and

supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, January 14, 2005.

                                               2
       Should new counsel be appointed, the Clerk of the Court is instructed to accept and

file any brief or supplemental brief newly appointed counsel desires to file. Absent a motion

for extension of time, new counsel’s brief(s) shall be due within 30 days after filing of the

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records. The State’s brief will be due within 60 days

following filing of the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records or within 30 days following

the filing of new counsel’s brief(s), whichever is later. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a) & (b).

       It is so ordered.

                                                   Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              3