Court Opinion

ID: 4452538
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-02 00:00:19.245373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:45.244418
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-60736      Document: 00515183957         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/01/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-60736
                                                                            FILED
                                                                     November 1, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR ALFREDO BURGON-URREA, also known as Oscar Alfredo Burgos-
Urrea, also known as Oscar Alfredo Burgos Ureea, also known as Oscar Alfredo
Burgos, also known as Oscar Alfrdo Burgos, also known as Oscar Alfredo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Mississippi
                              USDC No. 1:18-CR-9-1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Alfredo Burgon-Urrea has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Burgon-Urrea has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-60736    Document: 00515183957    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/01/2019

                                No. 18-60736

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2