Court Opinion

ID: 9893131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-25 21:01:03.912762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:43.193746
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6518      Doc: 11         Filed: 10/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6518

        DWAYNE PEAKS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        GANOE, Correctional Officer,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00906-PX)

        Submitted: October 19, 2023                                   Decided: October 24, 2023

        Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Dwayne Peaks, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6518      Doc: 11        Filed: 10/24/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Dwayne Peaks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his amended

        42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Peaks v. Ganoe, No. 1:22-cv-00906-PX

        (D. Md. Apr. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2