Court Opinion

ID: 9784305
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 20:42:05.27218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:52.633104
License: Public Domain

BROWN, J., concurring. I concur with the majority opinion in its entirety and write separately to urge the Committee on Professional Conduct to consider adopting formal guidelines on the time period in which a formal complaint should be lodged and an attorney notified when an allegation of professional misconduct has been made against him or her. In this particular case, the time between the original complaint and the making of a formal allegation by the Committee was more than three years. Admittedly, there may be a reasonable explanation for such a delay in some cases. But the delay seemed largely unexplained in this case. According to the American Bar Association, as of 2007, the most recent year for which data is available, twelve states had adopted such guidelines.1 American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility, 2007 SURVEY ON LAWYER DISCIPLINE Systems, Chart V: Case Processing Times. In my view, the Committee should examine what other states have done and consider promulgating formal time-processing standards. Without question, in some instances, an unreasonable delay in bringing a formal complaint can prejudice the ability of a lawyer to mount a defense to the allegation.  . The states with formally-adopted time standards are Alaska, Arizona, California, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin.