Court Opinion

ID: 8633947
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:42:06.172141+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:52.042830
License: Public Domain

WILKINS, District Judge.
When fhis case was called for hearing, the counsel for libel-ants, to sustain their case, offered to read certain ex parte depositions taken at Green Bay, Wisconsin. To this objection was raised, that the depositions were inadmissible, because the provisions of the act of congress [1 Stat. 73] were not complied with.
That part of the judiciary act providing for the taking of ex parte depositions, has ever been construed strictly. The act requires, that the witnesses “shall be carefully examined and cautioned and sworn,” &c. The act requires that the witness shall be cautioned as well as sworn. It does not appear from the certificate of the officer before whom the deposition was taken, that this was done.
The objection is sustained, and the deposition rejected. The cause will be continued, to allow the libelant to retake the deposition.