Court Opinion

ID: 997744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:01:11.733307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:06.204685
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7064

MICHAEL ANTHONY BROWN,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DANIEL L. STIENEKE,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-364-5-BR2)

Submitted:   January 21, 1999             Decided:   February 5, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Anthony Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certif-

icate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See Brown v. Stieneke, No. CA-98-364-5-BR2

(E.D.N.C. June 23, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2