Court Opinion

ID: 2875089
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 05:57:30.660709+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:09.340287
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00445-CR

Wendel Glenn Klotz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 06-1426-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M    O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Wendel Glenn Klotz guilty of felony driving while intoxicated. 
See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a) (West 2003), § 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2007).  The jury
assessed punishment, enhanced by two previous felony convictions, at seventy years' imprisonment.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right
to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See
Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Diane Henson, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Affirmed
Filed:   April 23, 2008
Do Not Publish