Court Opinion

ID: 1006059
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:05:42.220344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.645699
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-7060

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

KEITH L. HOPKINS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-95-73, CA-99-366-3)

Submitted:   November 29, 2001          Decided:     December 12, 2001

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith L. Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Keith L. Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001) and denying his motion for reconsideration.    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no re-

versible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Hopkins, Nos. CR-95-73; CA-99-366-3 (E.D. Va. June

13, 2000 & May 11, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2