Court Opinion

ID: 5117419
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-09 01:00:34.490725+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:02.732200
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40132     Document: 00516049050         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/08/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                  No. 21-40132                          October 8, 2021
                                Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Eduardo De Jesus Zavala-Maravilla,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 7:20-CR-1795-2

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo De
   Jesus Zavala-Maravilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zavala-Maravilla has not filed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40132    Document: 00516049050          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/08/2021

                                  No. 21-40132

   a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of
   the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2