Court Opinion

ID: 9670935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:28:26.362919+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:52:21.456743
License: Public Domain

D. F. Walsh, J.
(dissenting). I must respectfully dissent. My review of the record persuades me that the trial judge considered only those convictions which were not denied by the defendant at the time of sentencing. Moreover, since the defendant failed to follow the procedure mandated by the Supreme Court in People v Moore, 391 Mich 426, 440; 216 NW2d 770 (1974), remand for a Tucker hearing is not required.11 would affirm.

 United States v Tucker, 404 US 443; 92 S Ct 589; 30 L Ed 2d 592 (1972).