Court Opinion

ID: 9368184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 01:00:28.251834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:06.120244
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50241        Document: 00516633353             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/02/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-50241
                                                                                     FILED
                                                                               February 2, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                     Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Freeman Lamont Brooks,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Western District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:21-CR-231-4
                     ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Jones, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Freeman
   Lamont Brooks has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brooks has not filed a response. We
   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50241     Document: 00516633353         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/02/2023

                                  No. 22-50241

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2