Court Opinion

ID: 9880488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 19:19:26.528064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:13.556701
License: Public Domain

HORTON, J., dissenting.
*767I respectfully dissent from the Court's decision. "Where an appellate court reverses or vacates a judgment upon an issue properly raised, and remands for further proceedings, it may give guidance for other issues on remand." Urrutia v. Blaine Cnty. , 134 Idaho 353, 359, 2 P.3d 738, 744 (2000). Although the Court today holds that the discussion of the meaning of encumbrance in Regan I was dicta, I disagree. The discussion was included to provide guidance to the trial court on remand. In my view, the district court properly applied the law as explained in Regan I.