Court Opinion

ID: 8677868
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:17:15.25171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.611063
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Lee Pritchett appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pritchett, No. 4:03-cr-70162-JLK-1 (W.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2015); see United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir.2013) (reviewing the disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.