Court Opinion

ID: 5434165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 17:50:59.604137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:45.276204
License: Public Domain

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court—
Terry, C. J. concurring.
There is no merit in this appeal.
The only error assigned is, the ruling of the Court admitting in evidence certified copies of certain deeds to third persons as grantees, which deeds had been regularly acknowledged and recorded. The plaintiff below laid the foundation for their introduction by his affidavit that the originals were not under his control. By this affidavit he brought himself within the words of the Act of April 29th, 1857, (Acts, 317,) the second section of which provides, that “ duly certified copies of deeds regularly recorded upon the acknowledgment or proof of execution by the party or parties thereto, subject, however, to all legal exceptions that might be taken to the original if produced, shall be received in evidence in all the Courts of the State, without further or other proof of the execution thereof, in the same manner and with like effect, as if the originals were produced and *639proven; provided, it be shown that the said originals are not under the control of the party offering the said copies, or are lost,” and this showing is properly made by the affidavit of the party.
Judgment affirmed.