Court Opinion

ID: 8676970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:41:56.04298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.737562
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Holder, No. 7:14-cv-00215-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.