Court Opinion

ID: 5497961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 02:55:10.291148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:51.749430
License: Public Domain

Dykhan, J.
This is an action on two promissory notes, and the defense is that they never were commercial paper, and were executed by the defendant merely as vouchers for money advanced by the plaintiff and his associates, to be disbursed by the defendant for the promotion of a railroad enterprise in which all the parties were interested, and that there never was any intention or expectation that the notes would be paid. The testimony produced on the trial, and the circumstances surrounding the transaction, support the theory of the defendant, and the trial judge directed a verdict in his favor. We concur in the views expressed by the trial judge in his assignment of his reasons for directing a verdict for the defendant, and we find no necessity for any extended remarks at this time. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.