Court Opinion

ID: 2755724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-26 16:08:49.669323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:03.073959
License: Public Domain

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
                    REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
                    consistent with this order.'

                                                                                             J.

                                                                                             J.

                    CHERRY, J., concurring:
                                  For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
                    U.S. Bank, NA,      130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
                    that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
                    association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
                    Investments    is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
                    disposition of this appeal.

                                                                Cherry
                                                                      akarave
                    cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
                         Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
                         Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
                         Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
                         Eighth District Court Clerk

                          'The injunction imposed by our February 12, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                          2
(0) 1947A    e(r)