Court Opinion

ID: 5162385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 02:59:08.867855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:41.201216
License: Public Domain

PARKS, Judge,
specially concurring:
The majority concedes that defense counsel’s motion for a directed verdict was based on the fact that the prosecutor failed to read the second page of the Information as mandated by 22 O.S. 1981, § 860(b), but then finds that the issue was not properly preserved for review on appeal with a specific objection. While I disagree with this rationale, the record shows that the trial court quoted the second page of the Information in his instructions to the jury during the second stage. (O.R. 58) I believe this was sufficient to preclude a finding of reversible error here. Thus, I concur in the result reached by the majority.