Court Opinion

ID: 9583103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:34:50.724939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:14.329628
License: Public Domain

HANSCUM, District Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the affirmance of the order dismissing Cranstons’ claim against WCWPB on the basis of this court’s prior rulings on the technical grounds of defective notice. In light of this court’s consistent position requiring strict compliance, I subscribe to the majority’s reasoning to reach this rather harsh result.
Hesitating, I have to concur in the reversal of the order dismissing Cranstons’ amended complaint against the Weston County Board of Commissioners, only on the basis that the record is devoid of evidence that the insurance policy could not provide coverage for the claim at issue here. I suspect that is the case based on reasonable interpretations of the record and the trial court’s observations on that point, but that is a matter for another day in the trial court.