Court Opinion

ID: 2965157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:36:20.123201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:03.121330
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-2127

                               JOSEPH M. CRAVEIRO, JR.,

                                Petitioner, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Respondent, Appellee.
                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                  [Hon. Robert W. Lovegreen, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
                                             _____________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Joseph M. Craveiro on brief pro se.
            __________________
            Sheldon  Whitehouse,  United  States  Attorney,  and  Margaret  E.
            ___________________                                   ____________
        Curran, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
        ______

                                 ____________________

                                   February 3, 1998
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   After carefully reviewing  the record
                      __________

            and the parties' briefs, we  summarily affirm the judgment of

            the district court on the basis of United States v. Estrella,
                                               _____________    ________

            104 F.3d  3 (1st Cir.),  cert.denied, 117 S. Ct.  2494 (1997).
                                     ___________

            As  for the  claim  of  ineffective  assistance  of  counsel,

            petitioner  has waived  it by  not  presenting it  in his  28

            U.S.C.   2255 motion.  See Dziurgot v. Luther, 897 F.2d 1222,
                                   ___ ________    ______

            1224 (1st Cir. 1990) (per curiam).

                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                      ________   ___

                                         -2-