Court Opinion

ID: 8454878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:15:31.342379+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.957198
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph Copes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Copes v. Clem, No. 1:12-cv-00441-JFM, 2013 WL 1010362 (D.Md. Mar. 13, 2013). We deny Copes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.