Court Opinion

ID: 2887751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 19:31:05.953573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:28.017378
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-01-0435-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL D

                                FEBRUARY 21, 2002
                          ______________________________

                                     ANTONE RICHIE

                                                         Appellant

                                             v.

                                 THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                Appellee
                        _________________________________

              FROM THE 180th DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

                   NO. 857,644; HON. LARRY FULLER, PRESIDING
                        _______________________________

                             ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                         _______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J. QUINN, and REAVIS, JJ.

       Antone Richie appealed, on May 24, 2001, his conviction for possession of a

controlled substance. Eventually, the clerk’s record was filed October 17, 2001 and the

reporter’s record on November 27, 2001. These circumstances, when applied to the

pertinent rule of appellate procedure, required that appellant file his brief by December 27,

2001. He did not. On January 9, 2002, we informed appellant, by letter, of the December

27th deadline and directed him to explain why he did not comply with same. So too did we
inform him that the cause would be abated pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(b) if such a response was not forthcoming within ten days. The response received

consisted of a motion to extend the deadline. Same was granted, and the deadline was

extended to February 13, 2002. Like its predecessor, that date also lapsed without

appellant complying with it or otherwise contacting the court and explaining why his

appellant’s brief was not filed.

       Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 180th District

Court of Harris County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be served upon the parties and, thereafter,

conduct a hearing to determine the following:

       1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

       2.     whether appellant is indigent; and,

       3.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due

              to counsel’s failure to timely file a brief. See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387,

              394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an

              indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the

              first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in

              preparing and submitting an appellate brief).

       The trial court is further ordered to execute findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue this appeal, is indigent, and was denied effective assistance of counsel, then we

also direct it to appoint new counsel to assist appellant in the prosecution of the appeal.

                                             2
The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new

counsel appointed to represent appellant must also be included in the court’s findings of

fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed

1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and

2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s

record reporter’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 25, 2002.

Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same

on or before March 25, 2002.

       It is so ordered.

                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              3