Court Opinion

ID: 51215
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:03:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:13.958034
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             JAN 12, 2007
                              No. 05-16939                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 05-00199-CR-T-30TBM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

VIRGILIO ANTONIO RODRIQUEZ POMARE,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                             (January 12, 2007)

Before MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare
("Rodriguez") in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.