Court Opinion

ID: 9939967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-13 15:13:22.341731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:10.001957
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                      San Antonio, Texas
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                         No. 04-23-01083-CV

                                    LITTON FULLER GROUP,
                                           Appellant

                                                   v.

   Carlton CLARDY JONES as Trustee for the Jones Carlton & Shirley Family Trust Dated
 January 25, 1990, as Restated on August 8, 2006 and Shirley Mann Jones Bypass Trust Dated
                                     January 20, 2007,
                                         Appellees

                      From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                    Trial Court No. 2023CI21138
                               Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice
                  Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 7, 2024

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           On December 18, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal stating its intent “to appeal the

trial court decision, memorialized in the attached ‘Judge’s Notes,’ denying Defendant Litton Fuller

Group’s Special Appearance signed and filed on November 29, 2023.” The clerk’s record was

filed on January 4, 2024. Although the clerk’s record contains the referenced Judge’s Notes, the

clerk’s record does not contain an order denying appellant’s special appearance. See Gomez v.

Stilley, No. 04-23-00129-CV, 2023 WL 2591495, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 22, 2023,
                                                                                     04-23-01083-CV

no pet.) (mem. op.) (noting judge’s notes do not constitute an appealable order). Because the record

contained no appealable order, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded to our order explaining it did “not disagree

or contest this Court’s assessment regarding jurisdiction.”

       Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                  PER CURIAM

                                                -2-