Court Opinion

ID: 9762876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 02:33:08.75108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:38.197334
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Jacobs, J.:
I must respectfully dissent.
Appellant’s preliminary objections in the nature of a petition to dismiss for lack of venue specifically and erroneously relied upon Section 11 of the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1968), 62 P.S. §2043-13 (b) (Supp. 1975-76).1 Printed Record at 8a.
Under Section 11, the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County was a court of proper venue. On appeal to this Court, appellant relies upon Section 33 of the aforementioned Act, 62 P.S. §2043-35 (Supp. 1975-76). This section was not the specific ground relied upon below and I would therefore affirm the order of the lower court.
PRICE, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

. Act of December 6, 1972, P.L. 1365, No. 291, 62 P.S. §2043-13 (b) (Supp. 1975-76).