Court Opinion

ID: 988064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:47:35.763693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:08.678916
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7032

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOHNNY THOMAS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CR-94-75, CA-94-246-5-F)

Submitted:   December 14, 1995            Decided:   January 5, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Franklin Askins, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Thomas, Nos. CR-94-75; CA-94-246-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 29, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2