Court Opinion

ID: 9929739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-03 21:00:54.700945+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:35:27.512692
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1503      Doc: 21       Filed: 02/02/2024   Pg: 1 of 3

                                          UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                            No. 23-1503

        MARIE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH,

                            Movant - Appellant,

                     and

        RICHARD ALEXANDER MURDAUGH,

                            Plaintiff,

                     v.

        WASHAVA MOYE, In her official capacity as Interim Director Alvin S. Glenn
        Detention Center, Richland County Government,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00608-CMC)

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                Decided: February 2, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1503      Doc: 21         Filed: 02/02/2024    Pg: 2 of 3

        Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN
        LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1503      Doc: 21        Filed: 02/02/2024     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              Marie Assa’ad-Faltas, MD, MPH, appeals the district court’s order denying

        Assa’ad-Faltas’ motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s order granting Richard

        Alexander Murdaugh’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his action for injunctive relief. We

        have reviewed the record and discern no error by the district court. We thus affirm the

        district court’s order. Murdaugh v. Moye, No. 3:22-cv-00608-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2023).

        We deny all pending motions, including but not limited to Assa’ad-Faltas’ motions to

        appoint counsel, for an initial hearing en banc, for injunctive relief pending appeal, to

        remand to the district court, and for an immediate remote hearing. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3