Court Opinion

ID: 7748801
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:15:17.369715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:39.085742
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So.2d 348 (Fla.1988).
STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.