Court Opinion

ID: 7686945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:21:30.266241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:36.733775
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.
We grant the state’s motion for rehearing and amend the last sentence of our opinion issued on January 20,1995 to read as follows: The requirement that, while on probation, he “work diligently at a lawful occupation” is not error. Armstrong v. State, 620 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
REHEARING GRANTED; OPINION AMENDED.
COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
DAUKSCH, J., dissents without opinion.