Court Opinion

ID: 5419686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:25:34.79299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:39.911652
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding. .
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.