Court Opinion

ID: 7745672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:09:53.705222+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:36.724810
License: Public Domain

1 The defendant's postconviction petition is styled RufusWalker v. State. The case action summary is entitled Rufus Walkerv. State. The related case in the Supreme Court spelled his nameRuffus Walker.
 After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in Ex parte Walker,800 So.2d 135 (Ala. 2000), the judgment as it relates to Walker's claim alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is due to be reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with that opinion. On remand, the circuit court may conduct such further proceedings or take such evidence as it deems necessary. The circuit court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this Court at the earliest possible time and within 56 days of the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include the circuit court's written order and a transcript of the remand proceedings conducted by the circuit court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS*.
Long, P.J., and McMillan, Cobb, and Baschab, JJ., concur.
* Note from the reporter of decisions: On December 1, 2000, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion. On January 12, 2001, that court denied rehearing, without opinion. On May 4, 2001, the Supreme Court denied certiorari review without opinion (1000725). *Page 140