Court Opinion

ID: 9856209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 06:40:59.39104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:26:34.211554
License: Public Domain

PARKER, J.,
concurring in result.
A study of the uncontr'adicted facts in this case leads me. to' the conclusion that Stancil is a common carrier, and that there is no error in that part of the charge that Stancil owed to Smith and Taylor the duty of exercising the highest degree of care 'for, their safety', consistent with the practical operation of his business, for which a new trial is awarded.
However, in my opinion, a new trial should be allowed because of the hypothetical questions and the answers thereto mentibned in the majority opinion. v- ■
Therefore, I concur in the result.