Court Opinion

ID: 9961119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-17 21:01:09.84768+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:18.681512
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7276      Doc: 14         Filed: 04/16/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-7276

        TIMOTHY ALLEN HONEA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        FRED WEBB, Attorney, sued in their individual and official capacities; BOB
        BOYKIN, Private Investigator, sued in their individual and official capacities;
        ROBERT SHARPE, Director of Capital Defender Office, sued in their individual
        and official capacities; C. WINSTON GILCHRIST, North Carolina Superior Court
        Judge, sued in their individual and official capacities,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
        Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00829-LCB-JEP)

        Submitted: April 11, 2024                                         Decided: April 16, 2024

        Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Timothy Allen Honea, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7276      Doc: 14         Filed: 04/16/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Timothy Allen Honea appeals the district court’s order accepting the

        recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Honea’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983

        complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Honea v. Webb, No.

        1:23-cv-00829-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2