Court Opinion

ID: 9404967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-26 20:04:05.804464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:18.348023
License: Public Domain

Filed 6/26/23 P. v. Ingram CA3
                                           NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                       (Tehama)
                                                            ----

    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                C097608

                    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                     (Super. Ct. No. NCR68870)

           v.

    JESSICA ASHLEY INGRAM,

                    Defendant and Appellant.

         Defendant Jessica Ashley Ingram appeals the trial court’s denial of her petition for
resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable
issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 and requested we exercise our
discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

1 Defendant filed this petition under former Penal Code section 1170.95. The
Legislature amended Penal Code section 1170.95 effective January 1, 2022, under Senate
Bill No. 775 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2021, ch. 551). Further, effective June 30,
2022, the Legislature renumbered Penal Code section 1170.95 to section 1172.6, without
substantive change (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10).

                                                             1
       On April 4, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief indicating
no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order
denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or an independent
review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo,
defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument
she wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we did not receive
a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned.
More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from
defendant.
       We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
(People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
                                      DISPOSITION
       The appeal is dismissed.

                                                     /s/
                                                 BOULWARE EURIE, J.

We concur:

    /s/
KRAUSE, Acting P. J.

    /s/
MESIWALA, J.

                                             2