Court Opinion

ID: 998858
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:17:06.84849+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:50.528996
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM CALVIN JOHNSON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-128-A, CA-98-1651-AM)

Submitted:   May 25, 1999                   Decided:   June 2, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Calvin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.   John Thomas Martin,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William Calvin Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See United States v. Johnson, Nos.

CR-94-128-A; CA-98-1651-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 1998).*   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
November 25, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on November 27, 1998.      Pursuant to
Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is
the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we
take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See
Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                 2