Court Opinion

ID: 7401065
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:01:39.948553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:57.732488
License: Public Domain

II. REMAINING ISSUES
Based on our finding Quicken did not violate the attorney preference statute, we decline to address its remaining arguments.
**582See Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 613, 518 S.E.2d 591, 598 (1999) (stating an appellate court need not address remaining issues when a decision on a prior issue is dispositive).
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the order on appeal is
REVERSED.
HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.