Court Opinion

ID: 9365095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 11:09:54.351849+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.224159
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-22-00319-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

LEMMIE WILLIAMS,                                          §   APPEAL FROM THE 3RD
APPELLANT

V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

KIMBERLY DOUGLAS,
APPELLEE                                                  §   ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM
         Appellant, Lemmie Williams, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states
that the parties resolved their differences and Williams no longer desires to pursue the appeal.
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.
Opinion delivered January 19, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                         JANUARY 19, 2023

                                        NO. 12-22-00319-CV

                                      LEMMIE WILLIAMS,
                                          Appellant
                                             V.
                                     KIMBERLY DOUGLAS,
                                          Appellee

                                 Appeal from the 3rd District Court
                    of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DCCV22-3038-3)

               THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the
appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party
incurring same.
                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.