Court Opinion

ID: 7431533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:54:09.469812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:28.688847
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*134pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. The petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.