Court Opinion

ID: 9827640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 17:43:27.791485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:27.267987
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Our attention has been called to the testimony given by Mrs. Mattie Farr in which she relates a conversation she had with Mr. Moreland in 1942 in an effort to get a settlement shortly prior to filing suit. According to her testimony when she stated to him “he had already handed the land back and I thought that the matter had been settled, he said, well, it had at one time, but he had changed his mind.” This testimony of Mrs. Farr, when considered with the alleged contents of the correspondence mentioned in the original petition, prevents the conclusion that as a matter of law a jury issue of the alleged mutual rescission had not been raised. 3 Tex.Jur., Appeal and Error, Sec. 744; 17 Tex.Jur. p. 910.
*389Our former affirmance of the judgment is set aside and the judgment of the lower court with respect to intervenors is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.