Court Opinion

ID: 9370391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-13 11:08:10.303913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.400725
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued February 7, 2023

                                      In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The

                          First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00047-CR
                            ———————————
                     IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a

petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus

directing the trial court to “[g]ive a written ruling on [his] Motion to Suppress

Evidence (Warrantless Seizure) and hold a Suppression Hearing.”1

1
      The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110,
      in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill
      presiding.
      Our review of DeBoest’s mandamus petition reflects that DeBoest has failed

to establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7,

52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly,

we deny DeBoest’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightower, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           2