Court Opinion

ID: 997738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:01:08.463898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:40.321696
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6233

ROBERT S. REYNOLDS,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PHILIP V. DORSEY,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-97-633)

Submitted:   January 21, 1999              Decided:   February 5, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert S. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert S. Reynolds seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998).*   We have reviewed the record and the

magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.    See Reynolds v.

Dorsey, No. CA-97-633 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14, 1998).    We deny Reynolds’

motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

     *
      Both parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

                                2