Court Opinion

ID: 33116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:01:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:59.846847
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   October 22, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 03-50371
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOMMIE CURTIS GOAD,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. W-02-CR-147-1
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Private counsel appointed to represent Tommie Curtis Goad

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).       Goad has filed a

response to the instant motion.    Our independent review of the

brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                     No. 03-50371
                          -2-

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.