Court Opinion

ID: 9628361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 09:17:52.851957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:29.747966
License: Public Domain

Rosellini, J.
(concurring) — I concur in the result of Justice Horowitz' opinion. I do this not because I believe that the interpretation of the Indian treaties by the United States Supreme Court is correct, but because I am compelled to do so by the supremacy clause of the United *956States Constitution. If I were not bound by the supremacy clause, I would adopt Justice Powell's dissent in Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, 443 U.S. 658, 61 L. Ed. 2d 823, 99 S. Ct. 3055 (1979).
Brachtenbach and Hicks, JJ., concur with Rosellini, J.
Reconsideration denied April 2, 1980,.