Court Opinion

ID: 4342051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-15 22:00:26.936677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:27.738974
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-10199    Date Filed: 11/15/2018   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-10199
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00009-RH-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID FIEDLER,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (November 15, 2018)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-10199    Date Filed: 11/15/2018   Page: 2 of 2

      Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for David Fiedler in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Fiedler’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2