Court Opinion

ID: 7613456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 11:19:54.520456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:55.957389
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
A simple addition error on appellant's sentencing scoresheet led the state, defendant, and the trial judge to believe that appellant's lowest permissible sentence was 99.45 months instead of 57.45 months. The scoresheet error is not harmless because the record does not conclusively show that the judge would have sentenced the defendant to the same 99.45 month prison term, having stated that he was not *1130inclined to "go against" the scoresheet. See Brooks v. State , 969 So.2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007) ("When scoresheet error is presented ... any error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet.") (emphasis in original). We therefore reverse and remand to the circuit court for resentencing.
Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.