Court Opinion

ID: 9768882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 13:54:09.918091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:11.353594
License: Public Domain

*331ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.
In our original opinion we failed to set forth fully the testimony of toxicologist Crawford. In addition to stating that he found 1.7 milligrams of heroin in the cellophane, he stated that such quantity “would be approximately one capsule of two or two and a half per cent of pure heroin which is usable for a narcotic addict.” This is the evidence which distinguishes this case from Greer v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. Rep. 377, 292 S.W. 2d 122, and Pelham v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. Rep. 226, 298 S. W. 2d 171, relied upon by appellant.
Remaining convinced that we properly disposed of this cause originally, appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.