Court Opinion

ID: 8331653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 21:07:27.39685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:28.534359
License: Public Domain

Dykman, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover for board and attendance furnished to the defendant, who is his brother.
The cause was tried at the circuit, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant has. appealed from the judgment. There was no motion for a new trial, and there is no appeal from any order refusing a new trial.
The appeal, therefore, brings to our consideration questions of law only, and as there was evidence sufficient to sistain the verdict, there is but one question of law to bo considered.
There was no motion for a non-suit, and no exceptions talen upon the trial.
Ihe following extract will show how the question came in tie case, and what it is :
“The-Court—Gentleman: When you adjust the .balance if you find the balance in favor of the defendant, of course you will take out of that any sum that you shall find rom the evidence in the case has been paid to the defenlant outside of this board. There are some such items. There is $200 to Tracy, and there are several other things’.’
Then, upon an intimation from the defendant’s counsel that thg last portion of the charge was not understood by him,its substance was repeated, and then the counsel said:
“We ake an exception to that.”
It will be seen that this portion of the charge was to *506control the jury if the finding was for the defendant, but as the jury found for the plaintiff, the charge had no application and no effect. Besides that, it was evidently right and laid down the true role for the deduction of credits, to which the plaintiff was entitled if the jury found for the ■defendant.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.