Court Opinion

ID: 9676860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 05:36:22.569836+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:51.351387
License: Public Domain

DISSENTING OPINION ON SECOND1 MOTION FOR REHEARING
GONZALEZ, Justice.
On further reflection and study, I believe that the Court’s writing on preservation of error is incorrect. For the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion, 838 S.W.2d 235, 241 (Mauzy, J., dissenting, on motion for rehearing), I would grant the motion for rehearing and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

. Ordinarily, under Rule 190(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we do not entertain second motions for rehearing in the Supreme Court. However, we may make exceptions where, as here, we withdraw a prior opinion and issue a substantially revised one in its place. Cf. TexR.App.P. 100(d) (providing for "further motion for rehearing” to complain of new judgment or opinion in the court of appeals.)