Court Opinion

ID: 2862834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:05:33.005729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:30.443019
License: Public Domain

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-0<A NAME="1">0</A>-00<A NAME="2">020</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>

<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Jonnie Peck and Estate of John Robert Peck</A>, Appellants</CENTER>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>Juanita Bishop Huertas, M.D., Michael R. Brancheau, M.D., Lawrence Chang, M.D.,</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>Marsha Staats, M.D., City of Austin d/b/a Brackenridge Hospital, and</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>Central Texas Medical Foundation, Appellees</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">TRAVIS</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">200TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">96-11840</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">LORA J. LIVINGSTON</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>

PER CURIAM

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Because Jonnie Peck and Estate of John Robert Peck have neither paid for nor made
arrangements to pay for the clerk's record, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 
<EM>See</EM> Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).</P>

<P>	The Clerk of this Court filed appellants' Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2000. 
After determining that appellants were not indigent, all parties were notified by letter dated May
12, 2000, that the record was due to be filed in this Court on or before June 12, or the appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution.  Thus far, appellants have failed to respond to this
notice.</P>

<P>	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. 
<EM>See</EM> <EM>id.</EM> 42.3(b).</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Justices Jones, Yeakel and Patterson</P>

<P>Dismissed for Want of Prosecution</P>

<P>Filed:   August 31, 2000</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>