Court Opinion

ID: 8460547
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 06:25:05.029917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:08.652638
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ramona Pena Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that Petitioner failed to show the requisite hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
Petitioner’s contention that the agency deprived her of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of her case does not state a colorable due process claim. See id.
*612Petitioner’s contention that the IJ erred in finding that her husband would accompany her to Mexico is not supported in the record.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.