Court Opinion

ID: 2964706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:29:55.33734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:06.362846
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [Not for Publication]
                            United States Court of Appeals
                                For the First Circuit
                                 ____________________
        No. 96-2095

                 HORIZONS HOTEL d/b/a CARIB INN TENNIS CLUB & CASINO
                        AND/OR HOTEL ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED,

                                     Petitioner,

                                          v.

                         THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

                                     Respondent.

                                 ____________________

                                ON PETITION FOR REVIEW
                        AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
            OF A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges,
                                            ______________
                            and O'Toole,* District Judge.
                                          ______________

                                 ____________________

            Wallace Vazquez Sanabria on brief for Petitioner.
            ________________________
            Corinna L. Metcalf,  Deputy Assistant  General Counsel,  Frederick
            __________________                                       _________
        L. Feinstein, General Counsel,  Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel,
        ____________                    __________
        and  Aileen A. Armstrong,  Deputy Associate General  Counsel, on brief
             ___________________
        for Respondent.
                                 ____________________

                                     MAY 19, 1997
                                 ____________________

        _____________________
        *Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation

                      Per curiam.  Having carefully reviewed the parties'
                      Per curiam.
                      __________

            briefs and  submissions, we find that  the administrative law

            judge's  findings, adopted  by  the National  Labor Relations

            Board, are  supported by  substantial evidence in  the record

            and  reflect a correct application of the law.  Therefore, we

            deny Petitioner's request for  review, and grant Respondent's

            request  for enforcement of its  supplemental order.  See 1st
                                                                  ___

            Cir. R. 27.1.  Costs to Respondent.
                           _____ __ __________

                                         -2-
                                          2