Court Opinion

ID: 1004231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:23.354706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:31.250031
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6251

MICHAEL RAY WILLIAMS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RICK JACKSON,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-170-5-F3)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                    Decided:   May 4, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ray Williams, Appellant Pro Se.     Sandra Wallace-Smith,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Ray Williams appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate

of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   Williams v. Jackson, No. CA-00-170-5-F3 (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 17, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2