Court Opinion

ID: 2538082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:15:11.057883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:25.289343
License: Public Domain

356 S.W.3d 881 (2012)
James BUTLER, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96365.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
January 17, 2012.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jessica P. Meredith, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Butler appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035[1], following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.