Court Opinion

ID: 4107655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-15 17:08:34.421274+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:08.262080
License: Public Domain

Matter of Pedro H. (2016 NY Slip Op 08461)

Matter of Pedro H.

2016 NY Slip Op 08461

Decided on December 15, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 15, 2016

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.

2494

[*1]In re Pedro H., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Michelle R. Duprey of counsel), for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ellen Ravitch of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a firearm, and committed the act of unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and imposed a period of enhanced supervision probation, which was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant's needs and the community's need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W ., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). A six-month adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would not have provided a long enough period of supervision, given the seriousness of the offense, which involved possession of a revolver under suspicious surrounding circumstances indicating that appellant may have been involved in additional criminal activity while acting in concert with others, and given appellant's poor record in school and while in custody.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 15, 2016
CLERK