Court Opinion

ID: 989212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:03:27.700293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:15.604833
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7953

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID GARFIELD STEWART,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-90-23-A, CA-95-1204-A)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Garfield Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Louis
Cardani, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Stewart, Nos. CR-90-23-A; CA-95-1204-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2