Court Opinion

ID: 5758087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:09:48.879179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:28.370851
License: Public Domain

Per Curimn.

Appeal by the State from a judgment awarding damages for the appropriation for highway purposes of 1.746 acres plus a pemanent easement. The award was of $1,425 and interest from October 9, 1952. The State questions (1) the amount of the award and (2) the period for which interest was computed. Despite allusions to probable zoning changes, without support in any relevant evidence, voiced by claimant’s expert and by the court, it is evident that ultimately the court quite properly awarded damages on the basis of residential use, but at an amount slightly in excess of claimant’s highest estimate, which estimate the State now accepts; and the award must be reduced accordingly. In respect of the State’s contention as to interest, the insufficient record before us does not permit intelligent review. In adducing no proof and relying solely upon a supposed stipulation referred to in the findings but not otherwise appearing in the record, the State did not sustain the burden of proving offsetting factors; and, in any event, the stipulation, as described in the findings, is unclear as regards intent and scope and certainly incomplete and insufficient to establish a sound basis for the State’s contention. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reduction of the award to $1,220, with interest from October 9, 1952 to August 31, 1964, and. as so modified, affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.