Court Opinion

ID: 8818890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 15:27:27.074013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:34.288318
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Thompson delivered the opinion of the court. 2. Customs and usages, § 11*—when custom, is controlling. A custom to be controlling so far as to affect the rights and liabilities of parties in their dealings with each other must be shown to be certain, continuous and so well known as to induce the belief that the parties contracted with reference to it. 3. Customs and usages, § 9*—customs opposed to law. A custom cannot prevail against a well settled rule of law. 4. Evidence, § 297*—foundation for introduction of books of account. Sufficient foundation is laid for the introduction of plaintiff’s books in evidence where plaintiff testifies that the books were kept by his agent, since deceased, in the usual course of trade and of his duty and employment by the plaintiff. 5. Evidence, § 315*-—evidence incompetent to verify books of account. Testimony of a party that he had compared his books of account with monthly statements' made to him by his agent and found the books to be correct, held not competent evidence to verify the books of account. 6. Principal and agent, § 242*—evidence admissible to show extent of agent’s authority. An indemnity bond given by an agent to his principal is not competent evidence to show the extent of the agency, where the bond does not purport to be the agency agreement between the parties. 7. Evidence, § 273*—when checks admissible. In an action to recover advancements or loans made by plaintiff’s agent drawing checks in favor of defendant, held, that the checks were admissible in evidence to be considered with other evidence in determining whether defendant was indebted to plaintiff. 8. Interest, § 80*—when instruction allowing rate fixed by custom erroneous. In an action to recover interest on advances made to a seller of grain, an instruction permitting plaintiff to recover seven per cent, interest thereon if the jury should believe that there was a custom of plaintiff to charge seven per cent, interest, held erroneous and misleading in view of statute which fixes the rate at five per cent, on loans unless the contract is in writing. 9. Payment, § 5*—check as evidence. A check alone is not evidence of an indebtedness of the payee to the drawer of the check but presumptively is evidence of the payment of a debt to the payee, or that money was paid for it at the time.