Court Opinion

ID: 9902320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-25 11:11:29.329374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:49.105937
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00190-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

MICHAEL D. BALLARD AND ROBIN                              §   APPEAL FROM THE 7TH
J. BALLARD,
APPELLANTS

V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANDY JUNEY REDMOND AND
PRECISION SPINE CARE,
APPELLEES                                                 §   SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM

         Appellants, Michael D. Ballard and Robin J. Ballard, filed an unopposed motion to
dismiss this appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered November 21, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                 COURT OF APPEALS

     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                       NOVEMBER 21, 2023

                                        NO. 12-23-00190-CV

                 MICHAEL D. BALLARD AND ROBIN J. BALLARD,
                                 Appellants
                                    V.
               ANDY JUNEY REDMOND AND PRECISION SPINE CARE,
                                 Appellees

                                 Appeal from the 7th District Court
                         of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 20-0087-A)

                   THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the
Appellants to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal
be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are
taxed against the party incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J