Court Opinion

ID: 9882788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-05 22:20:02.299112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:00.391396
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Confere, 2023-Ohio-3233.]

STATE OF OHIO                     )                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                  )ss:                NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SUMMIT                  )

STATE OF OHIO                                         C.A. No.       30560

        Appellee

        v.                                            APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
                                                      ENTERED IN THE
DANA CONFERE                                          COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                                                      COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO
        Appellant                                     CASE No.   2020-02-0350

                                 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Dated: September 13, 2023

        SUTTON, Presiding Judge.

        {¶1}     Defendant-Appellant, Dana Confere, appeals the judgment of the Summit County

Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, this Court affirms.

                                                 I.

                                  Relevant Background Information

        {¶2}     Mr. Confere assaulted R.A., his 36-week pregnant live-in girlfriend, and R.A.’s

unborn child. R.A. barely survived the assault and her child died. The Summit County Medical

Examiner determined the child died when R.A.’s placenta abrupted and separated from her uterine

wall as a result of the assault. During a forensic examination by Jane Bryan, a SANE nurse, R.A.

described her relationship with Mr. Confere, and details of the attack, as follows:

        It started off as a rough day for [Mr. Confere] because he didn’t have any cigarettes
        and he was saying things like he felt like I didn’t put anything forth with the
        relationship. [Mr. Confere] thought I was lazy because he said that I didn’t do
        enough around the house. But to be specific [Mr. Confere] was screaming at me
        because he wanted me to put the pizza in the stove for both of us. I said, “Sorry I
        wasn’t trying to put it off on you.” But he wasn’t listening, he didn’t care what I
                                                  2

       had to say. That’s when he started attacking the tables with a bar. It was a black
       bar with a sharp end on it. I got really scared because this was one of the [worst]
       freak outs that I’ve seen. [Mr. Confere] started threatening me saying, “I’m actually
       going to really beat you. If you can’t help me then you’re going to pay for it.”
       When he experiences these episodes he’ll tell me to leave the room but then when
       I go to walk into the other room he gets me to where I can’t walk away. He grabs
       me by my hair. He definitely knows how to make it to where I don’t leave the
       room. Over the course of our relationship there were times when he hurt me so bad
       that I thought my life would never be good again. I felt hopeless, I wanted it to
       stop. I wanted him to get help. I’ve told him before that I want him to get help for
       his explosive intermittent disorder and that I did some research and learned that
       people with this disorder can get better after two months of group counseling but
       he said, “I’m not going to change for anybody. You have to accept the way I am.”
       When he was attacking the tables with the bar he was breaking the glass and
       flipping them over. Here’s the weird thing, I don’t remember getting off the floor.
       He kept saying, “Get up, [R.A.]. Get up, [R.A.]. I’m really worried and I don’t
       know what to do.” Then he called his work buddy, [T.J.] and said, “Please come
       here, I need your help.” I was paralyzed on the ground but I could [hear] him
       saying, “She’s not getting up [.] I’m worried about my daughter. I’m worried about
       [R.A.].” I remember lying on the floor and not being able to open my eyes. * * *
       When this all started and he began his freak out, I tried to leave at first but he yanked
       me by my hair and back into the room and said, “You’re not going anywhere.” He
       continued to verbally assault me. He ripped me all over the house by my hair.
       Some of the time and intervals are hazy a little bit. I remember him hitting me after
       he broke the tables. He hit me on the right side of my face. Right before I fell on
       the floor paralyzed is when he kicked me in the stomach. I never fell down the
       stairs. I lied to protect him. I was so startled when he kicked me in the stomach
       and I remember making a noise and that’s all I remember about that. He stood in
       front of me and kicked me in the stomach. I fell to the ground paralyzed and I
       couldn’t move. * * * Once he kicked me and saw me fall, he quit. Before I fell I
       was standing at the front door and he put his hands around my neck and strangled
       me.

    R.A. indicated her entire body was in “excruciating pain,” and that her abdominal pain was

10/10 at the time of the assault. R.A. further indicated, “[a]fter [Mr. Confere] kicked me in the

stomach I knew something was terribly wrong because I had pain in my vagina.” R.A. feared Mr.

Confere upon discharge from the hospital and stated, “[i]f he’s in jail then I’m not afraid.1”

       1
        R.A. later attempted to recant her statement that Mr. Confere kicked her in the stomach
and spoke in his favor at sentencing.
                                                 3

       {¶3}    Mr. Confere was indicted on two counts of felonious assault, in violation of R.C.

2903.11(A)(1)/(D)(1)(a), felonies of the second degree; one count of involuntary manslaughter, in

violation of R.C. 2903.04(A)/(C), a felony of the first degree; one count of domestic violence, in

violation of R.C. 2919.25(A)/(D)(3), a felony of the fourth degree; one count of domestic violence,

in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A)/(D)(5), a felony of the fifth degree; one count of violating a

protection order, in violation of R.C. 2919.27(A)(1)/(B)(2); and one count of murder, in violation

of R.C. 2903.02(A)/(D) and R.C. 2929.02(B), an unclassified felony.

       {¶4}    Ultimately, Mr. Confere pleaded guilty to two counts of felonious assault, and the

remaining charges were dismissed. The trial court sentenced Mr. Confere to consecutive sentences

with an indefinite term of a minimum of 14 years and a maximum of 18 years.

       {¶5}    Mr. Confere now appeals raising one assignment of error for our review.

                                                 II.

                                  ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR

       THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IMPOSING
       SENTENCE ON [MR. CONFERE].

       {¶6}    In his sole assignment of error, Mr. Confere argues the trial court erred in “not

sentencing him to a minimum term for the felonious assaults and by ordering the sentences to be

run consecutively.” We disagree.

       {¶7}    The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that “an appellate court may vacate or modify

a felony sentence on appeal only if it determines by clear and convincing evidence that the record

does not support the trial court’s findings under relevant statutes or that the sentence is otherwise

contrary to law.” State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, ¶ 1; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2).

“Clear and convincing evidence is that measure or degree of proof which will produce in the mind
                                                   4

of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be established.” Cross

v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, 477 (1954).

       {¶8}    A sentencing court has “full discretion to impose a prison sentence within the

statutory range” and is not “required to make findings or give their reasons for imposing * * *

more than the minimum sentence[ ].” State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, paragraph

seven of the syllabus. “[N]evertheless, * * *, the court must carefully consider the statutes that

apply to every felony case. Those include R.C. 2929.11, which specifies the purposes of

sentencing, and R.C. 2929.12, which provides guidance in considering factors relating to the

seriousness of the offense and recidivism of the offender.” State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54,

2006-Ohio-855, ¶ 38. “Unless the record shows that [a] court failed to consider the factors, or that

the sentence is ‘strikingly inconsistent’ with the factors, the court is presumed to have considered

the statutory factors if the sentence is within the statutory range.” State v. Fernandez, 9th Dist.

Medina No. 13CA0054-M, 2014-Ohio-3651, ¶ 8, quoting State v. Boysel, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2013-

CA-78, 2014-Ohio-1272, ¶ 13.

       {¶9}    In State v. Bonnell, 140 Ohio St.3d 209, 2014-Ohio-3177, ¶ 37, the Supreme Court

of Ohio explained:

       In order to impose consecutive terms of imprisonment, a trial court is required to
       make the findings mandated by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at the sentencing hearing and
       incorporate its findings into its sentencing entry, but it has no obligation to state
       reasons to support its findings. Nor is it required to give a talismanic incantation
       of the words of the statute, provided that the necessary findings can be found in the
       record and are incorporated into the sentencing entry.

Further, “as long as the reviewing court can discern that the trial court engaged in the correct

analysis and can determine that the record contains evidence to support the findings, consecutive

sentences should be upheld.” State v. Bennett, 9th Dist. Summit Nos. 28842, 28843, 2018-Ohio-

3935, ¶ 10, quoting State v. Blackert, 9th Dist. Summit Nos. 27314, 27315, 2015-Ohio-2248, ¶ 10.
                                                  5

        {¶10} R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) provides:

        If multiple prison terms are imposed on an offender for convictions of multiple
        offenses, the court may require the offender to serve the prison terms consecutively
        if the court finds that the consecutive service is necessary to protect the public from
        future crime or to punish the offender and that consecutive sentences are not
        disproportionate to the seriousness of the offender's conduct and to the danger the
        offender poses to the public, and if the court also finds any of the following:

        (a) The offender committed one or more of the multiple offenses while the offender
        was awaiting trial or sentencing, was under a sanction imposed pursuant to section
        2929.16, 2929.17, or 2929.18 of the Revised Code, or was under post-release
        control for a prior offense.

        (b) At least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of one or more
        courses of conduct, and the harm caused by two or more of the multiple offenses
        so committed was so great or unusual that no single prison term for any of the
        offenses committed as part of any of the courses of conduct adequately reflects the
        seriousness of the offender's conduct.

        (c) The offender's history of criminal conduct demonstrates that consecutive
        sentences are necessary to protect the public from future crime by the offender.

        {¶11} Here, the trial court sentenced Mr. Confere on Count 1, felonious assault, to an

indefinite term of a minimum of not less than 6 years and a maximum of not more than 9 years.

Additionally, the trial court sentenced Mr. Confere on Count 2, felonious assault, to an indefinite

term of a minimum of not less than 8 years and a maximum of not more than 12 years. The trial

court further ordered these sentences to be served consecutively for an indefinite term of a

minimum of 14 years and a maximum of 18 years.

        {¶12} In its journal entry, the trial court stated, “[t]he [c]ourt has considered the record,

statements of counsel, as well as the principles and purposes of sentencing under [R.C.] 2929.11,

and the seriousness and recidivism factors under [R.C.] 2929.12.” As to consecutive sentences,

the trial court stated:

        The court further finds, pursuant to [R.C.] 2929.14(C)(4), that consecutive
        sentences are necessary to protect the public OR to punish the offender; that
        consecutive sentences are not disproportionate to the seriousness of the offender’s
                                                 6

       conduct; to the danger the offender poses to the public, and the court further finds
       the following:

       At least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of one or more courses
       of conduct, AND the harm caused by two or more of the multiple offenses so
       committed was so great or unusual that no single prison term for any of the offenses
       committed as part of any of the courses of conduct adequately reflects the
       seriousness of the offender’s conduct.

(Emphasis in original.)

       {¶13} At the sentencing hearing, R.A.’s father and Mr. Confere’s mother testified on

behalf of the State. R.A.’s father and Mr. Confere’s mother asked for maximum imprisonment of

Mr. Confere due to the seriousness of the crimes and the belief he would hurt other people. R.A.’s

father explained, “[i]f [Mr. Confere] had the nerve to kill his own unborn daughter, he’s going to

commit another crime. It’s as simple as this.” Further, R.A.’s father stated, “[Mr. Confere] put

[R.A.] in the ICU for a whole week. [R.A.] was lucky to be alive at Akron General.” The State

provided the trial court with photographs of R.A. taken at the hospital showing significant bruising

over most of her body, and images of R.A. intubated in a coma. As to the photographs, the

prosecutor explained:

       [R.A.] has injuries to her face. She has blood in her eye. She has marks behind her
       ears. She has scratches and strangulation marks about her neck. She has deep
       bruises, deep abrasions on her shoulder. She has bruises on her abdomen. She has
       bruises on both legs. She in essence is covered in injury and covered in bruises,
       and in my career that’s about the most extensive photographs that I’ve ever been
       given in regard[] to an individual who wasn’t deceased.

The State also provided the trial court with R.A.’s medical records and indicated the doctor treating

R.A. for the placental abruption stated, “in her 30 years [of practice] she had only seen three prior

cases that involved such an intense degree of damage.” A second doctor indicated he “fully

expected [R.A.] to die that day[.]” The State acknowledged had R.A. agreed to testify truthfully

in accordance with the medical evidence, Mr. Confere would not have received a plea deal for two
                                                     7

counts of felonious assault, but would have instead faced the charge of murder. Further, the State

argued:

                                                   ***

          And so we’re here at the sentencing phase, two counts of felonious assault. Serious
          physical harm, as serious as it gets, the death of a baby from [Mr. Confere’s] violent
          assault. Serious physical harm to [R.A.]. As violent and as serious as it gets.

                                                   ***

          And I agree with the sentiments presented by [Mr. Confere’s] mother, by [R.A.’s
          father], and ask this [c]ourt to impose the maximum sentence on Mr. Confere.

          {¶14} After allowing R.A., Mr. Confere, and Mr. Confere’s attorneys to speak on Mr.

Confere’s behalf, the trial court stated:

          [B]ased on your prior history, which I agree has no felonies * * * the assault
          charges, you violated that probation, you have other minor misdemeanor offenses
          that don’t influence the [c]ourt, but that was in 2009, and then you had a domestic
          violence, two counts in 2015, and you had an assault in 2015, you know, these are
          not nonviolent offenses. These are offenses of violence. And so the [c]ourt is
          concerned that you will not be able to properly behave or comply with probation.
          I don’t think probation is the proper sentence in this case.

          In addition, I placed a no contact order on for you to not have any contact
          whatsoever with [R.A.], and I realize that was over her objection, but I do that often
          even over the victim’s objection because I want there to be a cooling off period,
          and I want to make sure there’s no attempts at influence, and you violated that
          hundreds and hundreds of times.

                                                   ***

          Taking everything into account in light of [R.A.]’s desire for leniency, I might have
          been inclined to go easier on you if it weren’t for the severity of the injuries in this
          case.

          I want to make sure [R.A.] understands she’s not at fault here.

                                                   ***

          This is the man that beat you when you were 36 weeks pregnant. You understand
          you could have gone into the hospital the day before this happened and they could
          have delivered a perfectly beautiful, healthy daughter?
                                                  8

                                                ***

       I do find that in this case consecutive sentences are necessary to protect the public
       from future crime and to punish you for this offense, and that they are not
       disproportionate to the seriousness of your conduct and the danger that you pose to
       others; and that these offenses were committed as part of a course of conduct and
       the harm caused by those multiple offenses of felonious assault against, not only
       [R.A.], but her baby, was so great and so unusual that no single prison term
       adequately reflects the seriousness of your conduct; and the fact that you do have a
       history of prior conduct, albeit misdemeanors, there are multiple.

       And you also, in the two plus years you’ve been at the jail, you might not have
       started all those fights, but you did have a lot of disciplinary issues while you were
       in there and the [c]ourt takes that into account as well.

                                                ***

       {¶15} The record in this matter indicates the trial court considered all relevant principles

and purposes of sentencing, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors. Further, the trial

court made the requisite findings for consecutive sentences and the record contains more than

ample evidence supporting the trial court’s findings in this regard. Lastly, it is undisputed that Mr.

Confere’s sentence falls within the statutory range for felonious assault, a second degree felony,

and his sentence is not contrary to law.

       {¶16} Accordingly, Mr. Confere’s sole assignment of error is overruled.

                                                 III.

       {¶17} For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Confere’s assignment of error is overruled. The

judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

                                                                                 Judgment affirmed.

       There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
                                                 9

       We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common

Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy

of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.

       Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of

judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the period

for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(C). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is instructed to

mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the mailing in the

docket, pursuant to App.R. 30.

       Costs taxed to Appellant.

                                                     BETTY SUTTON
                                                     FOR THE COURT

CARR, J.
HENSAL, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

ANGELA M. KILLE, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and JACQUENETTE S. CORGAN, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.