Court Opinion

ID: 991228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:33:31.627514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:31.506078
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7288

KEITH EARL GODWIN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

ROBERT H. ANDERSON, III, Assistant Attorney
General; E. EVERETT BAGNELL, Judge; E. PRESTON
GRISSOM, Judge,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-958)

Submitted:   December 19, 1996            Decided:   January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Maryann Shea, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Godwin
v. Anderson, No. CA-95-958 (E.D. Va. July 14, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2