Court Opinion

ID: 2797118
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-28 21:00:59.390489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:07.928355
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                          APR 28 2015

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10239

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00727-JGZ

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
EDUARDO PENALOZA-CARLON,
a.k.a. Eduarto Carlon Penaloza,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                    Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted April 22, 2015**

Before:        GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

       Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the time-served sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Penaloza-Carlon’s counsel

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Penaloza-Carlon the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     14-10239