Court Opinion

ID: 6350107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-15 19:00:20.238402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:29.405630
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40188     Document: 00516357605          Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/15/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                                                         FILED
                                   No. 21-40188                      June 15, 2022
                                                                    Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                         Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Alexander Galvez-Marroquin,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 2:20-CR-1229-1

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alexander
   Galvez-Marroquin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galvez-Marroquin has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40188    Document: 00516357605         Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/15/2022

                                 No. 21-40188

   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2