Court Opinion

ID: 5710138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:52:51.26127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:29.973911
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Nassau University Medical Center, dated June 21, 2005, not to renew the petitioner’s contract for a fifth-year surgical residency position, the *703petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated August 16, 2005, which granted the motion of Nassau University Medical Center and Nassau Health Care Corporation, in effect, to dismiss the proceeding for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A resident physician seeking to have his contract to a hospital residency program renewed cannot circumvent the grievance process of Public Health Law § 2801-b (see Indemini v Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 4 NY3d 63, 68-69 [2005]; Gelbard v Genesee Hosp., 87 NY2d 691, 696 [1996]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion, in effect, to dismiss the proceeding because the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies (see Matter of Podolsky v Daniels, 21 AD3d 559, 560 [2005]; Matter of Hammond v Village of Elmsford, 8 AD3d 484, 485 [2004]). Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.