Court Opinion

ID: 8606309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 03:29:44.292316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:16.357139
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Jacobo Lomeli-Avalos appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court properly held that Lomeli-Avalos’s 2002 conviction for assault with a deadly weapon was pursuant to a statute that satisfies the definition of an aggravated felony provided by 18 U.S.C. § 16. The deadly nature of the weapon with which the assault is committed1 necessarily implies the danger of physical force.2 The intent requirement in the statute3 insures that a defendant intends to evoke the victim’s fear. Accordingly, the district court properly rejected Lomeli-Avalos’s collateral attack on the 2003 deportation and, correspondingly, properly denied his motion to dismiss the indictment.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. Nev.Rev.Stat. § 200.471(2)(b).

. Cf. United States v. Hernandez-Castellanos, 287 F.3d 876, 880-81 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that a statute covering conduct that does not necessarily involve the risk or use of force did not categorically satisfy the definition of an aggravated felony).

. Nev.Rev.Stat. § 200.471(l)(a).