Court Opinion

ID: 9411288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-26 15:04:56.496449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:06.102005
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                          Opinion filed July 26, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-526
                      Lower Tribunal No. F14-3553A
                          ________________

                           Antonio Hodgson,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                         The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

     Antonio Hodgson, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See § 775.21(4)(a)1.a., Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing that a

defendant “shall be designated as a ‘sexual predator’” upon conviction of a

“capital, life, or first degree felony violation, or any attempt thereof, of s.

787.01 or s. 787.02, where the victim is a minor, or s. 794.011, s. 800.04, or

s. 847.0145 . . . .”) See also State v. McKenzie, 331 So. 3d 666, 673 (Fla.

2021) (“The imposition of sexual predator status under section 775.21 is

related to the underlying criminal offense—but is not itself a sentence or

punishment”); § 775.21(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014) (“The designation of a person

as a sexual predator is neither a sentence nor a punishment but simply a

status resulting from the conviction of certain crimes”).

                                       2