Court Opinion

ID: 9679484
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:53:58.288192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:17:01.553264
License: Public Domain

BURGESS, Justice,
Concurring.
I concur in the result as it is a correct application of the law. While correct under the law, in my estimation, the result does not benefit either party. Appellant’s counsel stated that the property description in the original judgment partially describes property owned by a third party. Counsel recognized the original judgment would be a cloud on that title. Thus, further litigation will inevitably follow with the probability the result will mirror the judgment nunc pro tunc and a possibility that appellant may not prevail to any degree. It is cases like these which provide the critics of the legal profession with the ammunition they fling daily.