Court Opinion

ID: 3155629
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-11-18 16:04:19.072526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:53.849067
License: Public Domain

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 664

                 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
                                         DIVISION I
                                        No. CV-15-511

                                                   Opinion Delivered   November 18, 2015
MARY COLLINS
                                APPELLANT          APPEAL FROM THE RANDOLPH
                                                   COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V.                                                 [NO. CV-2010-156]

AVA LEUTHOLT AND RICHARD                           HONORABLE HAROLD S. ERWIN,
LEUTHOLT, INDIVIDUALLY, AND                        JUDGE
LEUTHOLT PROPERTIES, LLC
                    APPELLEES                      DISMISSED

                             M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge

       Appellant Mary Collins appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of appellees Ava and Richard Leutholt and Leutholt Properties. We

cannot reach the merits of the appeal because there is not a final order. Therefore, we

dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

       Appellant filed suit against appellees, alleging conversion of insurance proceeds after

the house she was purchasing from appellees was destroyed by fire. Appellees filed a

counterclaim for quiet title, alleging that appellant had breached the contract for sale and that

appellees were the record title owners of the property. Appellees subsequently moved for

summary judgment on appellant’s complaint. Following a hearing, the trial court entered

an order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s

complaint. Appellant timely appealed but later filed a motion with this court after noticing

that the order on appeal was not final due to the unresolved counterclaim. This court
                                  Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 664

dismissed the appeal.

       Appellant subsequently moved for the trial court to amend its order and deny

summary judgment.        Appellees filed a motion to dismiss their counterclaim without

prejudice. The trial court entered an order dismissing the counterclaim without prejudice,

and appellant filed another notice of appeal.

       Pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 2(a)(1), a party may appeal

from a final judgment or final decree of the trial court. Absent a certificate from the trial

court directing that the judgment is final, “any judgment, order, or other form of decision,

however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities

of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties.”

Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(2).

       When a defendant’s compulsory counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice and the

trial-court order addresses only the plaintiff’s claims, we have held that the order is not a final,

appealable order. Horne v. Henson, 2014 Ark. App. 687. The voluntary nonsuit of a

compulsory counterclaim does not operate to make an order final and appealable because the

counterclaim can be refiled. Crockett v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc., 2010 Ark. 90, 361 S.W.3d
262. Appellees’ compulsory counterclaim was dismissed by the trial court without prejudice.

Thus, there remains a dangling issue that has yet to be decided, and the summary-judgment

order is not a final, appealable order. Id.

       Although the trial court may certify an otherwise nonfinal order for an immediate

appeal by executing a certificate pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(1), no such certification

                                                 2
                                 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 664

was made in this case. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal without

prejudice for lack of a final order.

       Dismissed.

       GLADWIN, C.J., and ABRAMSON, J., agree.

       Murphy, Thompson, Arnold, Skinner & Castleberry, by: Casey Castleberry; and Grider Law
Firm, by: M. Joseph Grider, for appellant.

       James, House & Downing, P.A., by: Richard C. Downing, for appellees.

                                             3