Court Opinion

ID: 2959471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 03:58:15.899883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:20.740306
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                      JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2015

                                     NO. 03-14-00064-CR

                                Julie Ann Martinez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

        APPEAL FROM 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
        BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
                 AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                      JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2015

                                     NO. 03-14-00065-CR

                                Julie Ann Martinez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

        APPEAL FROM 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
        BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
                 AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.