Court Opinion

ID: 2811290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-06-24 19:01:35.681514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:08.939291
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-14995   Date Filed: 06/24/2015   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-14995
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00008-CDL-MSH-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

BRADFORD FORD,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                             (June 24, 2015)

Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-14995     Date Filed: 06/24/2015   Page: 2 of 2

      David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Bradford Ford, has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Ford’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2