Court Opinion

ID: 9837986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-02 21:01:04.425538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.700833
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6305      Doc: 10        Filed: 09/01/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6305

        MARVIN EDUARDO LUNA GOMEZ,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        L. FIELDS, Unit Manager; J. WEBB, Grievance Coordinator; A. BUCKLEN,
        RNCA,

                            Defendants - Appellees,

                     and

        KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; A. DAVID ROBINSON;
        STEVE HERRICK; C. DAVIS, Warden; K. MCCOY, Assistant Warden; R.
        WHITT, Chief of Housing and Programs; UM COLLINS; E. WHITED, RNCB
        (Medical) ADA Coordinator; C. SHELTON, Unit Manager,

                           Defendants.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
        Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:20-cv-00726-MFU-JCH)

        Submitted: August 29, 2023                                Decided: September 1, 2023

        Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6305      Doc: 10         Filed: 09/01/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6305      Doc: 10         Filed: 09/01/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              Marvin Eduardo Luna Gomez appeals the district court’s order granting summary

        judgment to Defendants in Gomez’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action because Defendants

        demonstrated that Gomez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed

        the record and conclude that the district court did not err in finding that Gomez failed to

        properly exhaust his administrative remedies, and that Gomez did not show that such

        remedies were unavailable to him. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    3