Court Opinion

ID: 9687491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 16:32:16.689924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:28.153872
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
BRADLEY, Judge.
Appellant, in his application for rehearing, presents no new matter which was not carefully considered in the original opinion.
However, we must take this opportunity to recognize an omission in our quotation of the case correctly cited as Gould v. Gould, 55 Ala.App. 379, 316 So.2d 210, cert. 294 Ala. 757, 316 So.2d 214. Our quotation should have included:
“Fourth, where the children are of tender years, the mother is generally considered better fitted to exercise custody unless she is unfit for the trust. Lansdell v. Snoddy, 269 Ala. 344, 113 So.2d 151.”
The omission was unintentional and does not alter our holding in any detail. We include the omitted portion here to affirm our intention to quote the entire passage in our original opinion.
In view of the finding that all matters raised by the petition for rehearing had been properly considered previously, we deny the petition.
Opinion extended.
Application for rehearing overruled.
WRIGHT, P. J., and HOLMES, J., concur.