Court Opinion

ID: 996599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:25.75905+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:24.273951
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6419

TIMOTHY LEE SWEENEY,

                                                Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                               Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-97-873-JFM)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lee Sweeney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Timothy Lee Sweeney appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Sweeney v. Smith, No. CA-97-873-JFM (D. Md.

Feb. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2