Court Opinion

ID: 9945893
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-28 19:01:29.615584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:23:23.994772
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 28 2024
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS,                       No. 23-15768

                Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01954-TLN-CKD

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A.; CHASE
HOME FINANCE LLC; MERSCORP, INC.;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC; LEE
SEALE; K. LEON; KATHLEEN DIPPERT;
SCOTT JONES,

                Defendants-Appellees.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of California
                    Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before:      FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

      Mary Alice Nelson Rogers appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s sua sponte

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar v. Sea-Land

Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

      The district court properly dismissed Rogers’s action because Rogers failed

to allege facts sufficient to state a claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678

(2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter,

accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)).

      We reject as unsupported by the record Rogers’s contention that defendants

or the district court violated her constitutional rights.

      All pending motions are denied.

      AFFIRMED.

                                            2                                      23-15768