Court Opinion

ID: 7360447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 06:14:33.575738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:30.348037
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
[1, 2] At the end of the stenographer’s minutes in this case it appears that the justice who tried the case said: “Judgment for the plaintiff for $367.” This was evidently a mistake, as the judgment actually rendered was for the sum of $240, as appears by the judgment contained in the record, which must control. A correct computation, however, shows that the plaintiff is entitled to but $238.
Judgment modified, by reducing the amount of recovery to the sum of $238, with appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to the respondent.