Court Opinion

ID: 9788648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:14:01.771551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:15.597044
License: Public Domain

OPALA, J.,
dissenting from petitioner's unconditional reinstatement.
1 1 This is a proceeding for de novo review of a Professional Responsibility Tribunal's recommendation that petition for reinstatement be conditionally granted. The conditions are described in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Trial Panel's report.
1 2 The Tribunal recommends (1) that "petitioner must agree [to] and more adequately disclose this restricted nature of the representation" he provides in prelitigation stage for clients injured in car wrecks and (2) that the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association be satisfied that petitioner has demonstrated "satisfactory knowledge of Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.8, 7.1 and 7.2 of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct."
[ 3 I would condition petitioner's reinstate ment as an active member of the Bar in the manner proposed by the Trial Panel's Report.