Court Opinion

ID: 2963791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:15:14.996825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:06.578920
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 17, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                           

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1340 

                               GERALD MASTRACCHIO, SR.,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              GEORGE VOSE, JR., ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                       [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                          Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Gerald Mastracchio on brief pro se.
            __________________
            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department
            _________________
        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  We  have carefully reviewed the record
                      __________

            and  briefs.  Plaintiff was not prejudiced by the magistrate-

            judge's refusal to continue the  hearing and order the return

            of  plaintiff's  legal  papers   because  it  is  clear  that

            plaintiff  had no liberty interest in his prison job.  Sandin
                                                                   ______

            v. Conner,  115 S. Ct. 2293  (1995); Bulger  v. United  States
               ______                           ______     ______________

            Bureau of Prisons, 65 F.3d 48, 50 (5th Cir. 1995).
            _________________

                      Affirmed.
                      ________

                                         -3-