Court Opinion

ID: 8143077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:17:25.408986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:33.270397
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. Mc*648Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.
No. 366.
No. 368.
No. 369.
No. 370.
No. 371.
No. 372.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.
Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.