Court Opinion

ID: 9961183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-18 08:15:31.440388+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:25.142295
License: Public Domain

In The
                             Court of Appeals
                    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                  No. 07-24-00059-CV

                        ER PROPCO CRAIG, LLC, APPELLANT

                                          V.

                YULANDA SHNELL CAMPBELL, ET AL., APPELLEES

                          On Appeal from the 108th District Court
                                   Potter County, Texas
         Trial Court No. 111370-E-CV, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding

                                    April 17, 2024
                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
                 Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

      Appellant, ER Propco Craig, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s order denying its

motion to dismiss pursuant to section 74.351 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

Now pending before this Court is Appellant’s motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the

appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party

from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court

has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the
motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs,

costs will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                       Per Curiam

                                            2