Court Opinion

ID: 2905747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:25:28.830221+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:31.542042
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-176 CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.P., J.C.P., AND C.G.P.

On Appeal from the 359th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 06-01-00373 CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
 On June 15, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained
why he needed time for filing the record.  Appellant did not respond.  The appellant is not
entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.  There being no
satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Costs are assessed against appellant.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								____________________________
									CHARLES KREGER
										Justice

Opinion Delivered August 10, 2006 
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.