Court Opinion

ID: 12546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 06:18:39+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:27.311035
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 96-30097
                         Summary Calendar

EVARISTUS MACKEY,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER ET AL.,

                                          Defendants-Appellees.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Louisiana
                         USDC No. 93-CV-965
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                            July 22, 1997
Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Prisoner-appellant, Evaristus Mackey, Louisiana inmate

#317335, filed a notice of appeal in this § 1983 action before

the effective date of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).

In Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional facility,1 this court

held that “prisoners whose appeals were pending on the effective

date of the PLRA must refile to this court in conformity with the

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
     1
          105 F.3d 972 (5th Cir. 1997).
                          No. 96-30097
                              - 2 -

amended statute before we consider their appeals on the merits”.2

The financial affidavits filed by Mackey in the district court do

not comply with the requirements for seeking in forma pauperis

(IFP) status under the PLRA.   Mackey has filed no documents in

this court in support of his economic eligibility to proceed IFP.

Mackey has a choice: he may refile this appeal in accordance with

the PLRA, or he may drop the appeal.   We will not consider

Mackey’s appeal “filed” for the purposes of § 1915(b), as

amended, unless he refiles.3

     Mackey has 30 days from the date of this order to comply

with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915.   This appeal is held in

abeyance until Mackey complies herewith, or until the expiration

of 30 days, whichever comes first.   If Mackey does not comply

within the 30 days, the clerk of this court is to dismiss the

appeal for lack of prosecution.4

     2
          Id. at 974.
     3
          Id. at 976.
     4
          See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3.