Court Opinion

ID: 9653310
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 17:43:30.869052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:57.682683
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.
In our original opinion we neglected to cite two recent opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States on the question of the legality of the instant search. Since we feel that they are in point with the instant case, we now do so: Salsburg v. Maryland, 346 U.S. 545, 98 L. Ed. 281, and Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 98 L. Ed. 561.
*52Remaining convinced that we properly disposed of this case originally, appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.