Court Opinion

ID: 5613656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:09:51.372883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:11.174579
License: Public Domain

Bloodworth, J.
The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the offense of the larceny of a hog is wholly circumstantial, and does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Conviction oil larceny of hog; from Wilcox superior court — Judge Gower. July 5, 1921.
Hal Lawson, for plaintiff in error.
J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Grantham, & Kassewitz, contra.