Court Opinion

ID: 4168658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-05-16 16:13:02.823106+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:00.609686
License: Public Domain

People v Piersig (2017 NY Slip Op 03893)

People v Piersig

2017 NY Slip Op 03893

Decided on May 16, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 16, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Feinman, Gesmer, JJ.

4011 607/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vChad Piersig, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered October 27, 2015,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MAY 16, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.