Court Opinion

ID: 9694793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 17:54:56.426515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:42.095538
License: Public Domain

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.
¶ 123. (concurring). I join Justice Roggensack's concurring opinion, with the exception of its discussion of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964). While Escobedo has, to date, never been overturned, the United State Supreme Court has since adopted the rule set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), with respect to custodial interrogation. As it is not necessary to rely upon Escobedo now to reach the correct result, I would not bring it into the discussion. In all other respects, I join Justice Roggensack's concurrence.