Court Opinion

ID: 7132282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:20:06.009415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:30.839511
License: Public Domain

JUDGE HOLT
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The Marion County Court, for the years 1882-3-4, levied an ad valorem tax for county purposes of thirty, forty and fifty cents, respectively, upon each one hundred dollars in value of taxable property in *536the county. It also levied for each of said years a like tax of seventy cents upon each hundred dollars in value of taxable property to pay the interest on the bonds it had issued in payment of its three hundred thousand dollars subscription to the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad, and to create a sinking fund for the payment of the principal of them. About twenty-eight miles of the Knoxville branch of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad lies within the county, as does about thirteen miles of what is now the Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad. The latter road was chartered in 1869. The county made its said subscription to it, and in 1871 adjusted it by delivering to the company bonds payable to bearer at the end of twenty years. The road being incomplete, the company being without means or credit to proceed with the work, and the time fixed in the charter for its completion being about to expire, the Legislature, in 1878, amended the charter so that the company could, and it did, by agreement of the stockholders, Marion county consenting thereto, divide itself into two distinct corporations, called the Northern and Southern Divisions of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad Company. Under this arrangement a certain portion of the road, and which included that part in Marion county, became the Southern Division, and the property of the stockholders south of a certain point, Marion county being one of them. Soon after this the Southern Division leased its uncompleted line to the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company for twenty-five years, Marion county voting its three hundred thousand dollars of stock subscribed to the Cumberland and Ohio Rail*537road Company in favor of such lease. By its terms the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company was. to complete and equip the road, it being secured in the necessary expenditure, and any debts of the Southern Division it might pay, by mortgage bonds-of the road to the amount of three hundred thousand, dollars, two-thirds of the net earnings to go to the-Southern Division and one-third to the lessee; provided, however, if the mortgage bonds did not repay the Louisville and Nashville Road its expenditure above-named, then the net earnings were to be applied for that purpose. The lease also' provided that all taxes legally assessed upon the leased property should be paid out of the gross earnings of the road. The road was, under this contract, completed through Marion county, and to a point beyond, and the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company has since been operating it.
The portion in Marion county of the two roads was duly assessed by the Board of Railroad Commissioners, and the assessment certified by the Auditor to its county clerk. The appellant paid a portion of the tax levied for county purposes for the years 1882-4. It also made payments upon the railroad tax for the same years, and if the portion of the Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad lying in Marion county was not liable for this last-named tax, as is claimed, but only so much of the Knoxville branch as is in the county, then the appellant overpaid this tax for the year 1882 by about five hundred dollars. This action was- brought to recover the balances of the tax for county purposes for 1882-4, and for that *538of 1883; also a balance of the railroad' tax for 1882, as the county, claims both, roads are liable to it; a balance for 1884, and for the tax of 1883. Interest was claimed upon all these amounts.
The lower court held the county levies to be invalid; that the Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad was not subject to the railroad tax, and rendered a judgment for so much of this tax for the year 1883 as had been assessed against the Knoxville branch of the appellant, with interest from October- 1, 1883; and also for the year 1884, with interest from October 1, 1884, less what the appellant had paid on its railroad taxes for the last-named year. It refused to take any account of the overpayment by the appellant on its railroad taxes for 1882. The railroad company now complains of this refusal, and also because of the allowance of interest in the judgment. The county, upon the other hand, by' a cross-appeal, seeks to reverse the ruling below as to the taxes for county purposes, and the alleged non-liability of the Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad for the railroad taxes.
Taxes are not debts within the legal meaning of the term. They are not based upon contracts, either express or implied. They come upon the tax payer in inmtwm. Their payment is a duty which the citizen owes to the State in return for the protection it affords him and his property. Interest is not allowable upon them by the general law. The power to impose it must come , from a statute. Although they are payable at a certain time, they do not carry interest unless the statute says so. It, upon the contrary, provides fixed penalties for their non-payment.
*539It was said by this court in the case of Ormsby v. City of Louisville, 79 Ky., 197, that interest is not .allowable upon taxes by way of damages, and this rule has since been followed in Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Hopkins County, 87 Ky. Rep., 605; Kentucky Central Railroad Company v. Pendleton County, &c., 8 Ky. Law Rep., 517, and other cases.
If credit were given to the appellant upon the railroad taxes for 1888 for the amount overpaid on those ■ of 1882, it would practically be a recovery of taxes voluntarily paid by the appellant under a mistake.of law. These taxes could only be recovered by suit. Resort .to judicial proceedings was necessary. The •statute provides this mode of collection. If the appellant declined to pay, it necessarily followed. that it Avould have its day in court, where it could raise the question of its liability for them. It is a general rule that a voluntary payment by the tax-payer leaves Mm remediless. If, however, distraint or a summary mode of collection may be adopted, then the payment will not be regarded as voluntary, and the tax-payer may sue to recover taxes collected, without legal authority. A distinction is to be taken between cases where their collection can be enforced summarily, and those where resort must be had to the courts. In the • one case the tax-payer must submit to a levy upon his property or pay the money. In the other he has the opportunity to contest the demand in court, and if he does not choose to do so, and voluntarily pays it, he is remediless. Considerations of public policy require this rule, and the tax-payer can not complain *540with grace, because lie has, by his own neglect, missed, thg opportunity afforded him by law for his protection. This view is supported by the cases of the City of Louisville v. Anderson, &c., 79 Ky., 334, and Railroad Company v. Hopkins County, supra.
It has been repeatedly held by this court that a railroad can not be taxed by a county to pay the subscription of the same county to aid in its construction. (Clark County Court v. E., L. & B. S. R. R. Co., 7 Ky. Law Rep., 761; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Hopkins County, supra.) If this could be done, it would result that the county would only pay a portion of its debt. It would be quasi repudiation. The creditor would be made by its debtor to pay a part of its own demand. The railroad would, in fact, get but a part of the sub scription, and the obligation of the contract would pro tanto be impaired. It matters not that the county issued bonds in payment of the subscription. It now proposes to tax the road to pay these bonds. This is the same as if it proposed to tax the road to pay the subscription. It would be doing it in effect. The Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company is not the owner of this Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio RaiUoad. If it had purchased it, and then completed or added to it, a different case would be presented.' As this record shows, however, it is merely its creditor, and is operating it under a lease. The road, including all the improvements which have been put upon it, belongs to the Southern Division of the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad Company. It is true the county subscription was to *541the Cumberland and Ohio Railroad Company. What is now, however, the Southern Division can not be regarded, so far as the subscription is concerned, as a new or distinct company. The Legislature merely divided the old company into two distinct companies by consent of all the stockholders, Marion county in•cluded, it becoming, by virtue of the charter of the original company and the subsequent legislation, a stockholder to the extent of its subscription in the Southern Division, and its tax-payers, upon the payment of their taxes, stockholders therein, pro tanto, the county stock thereupon decreasing to that extent. The .equity which the old company had to the exemption from taxation to pay the subscription to it passed to the new company. The latter is not a pur•cliaser. The old company being merely divided by the Legislature, and the new one being invested by the act of the Legislature creating the two divisions, with all the rights and powers of the old company, Avas not divested of the exemption from taxation in ■aid of the subscription to build the road. To so hold Avould not only be inequitable, but unreasonable.
There is no law authorizing an ad valorem tax for county purposes generally. The law provides for a head tax only for these purposes. Nor is there any act of the Legislature to this effect as to Marion •county. It is only allowable for specific purposes. If a municipal corporation imposes taxes, it must be able to show due authority to make the demand. If a tax be levied for a specific purpose, it must appear that it was levied for that purpose. (Price v. Trustees of Bellevue, 1 Ky. Law Rep., 276.) The tax*542payer, when he pays an ad Valorem county tax, has a right to know the purpose intended, and how it is-to be applied. The orders for the county levies, aside-from those relating to the railroad tax, failed in Lototo show the object to which they were to be applied, and they are not aided by any sufficient pleading in this respect, even conceding that this were possible.
The judgment upon the main appeal is reversed, so-far as it allows interest. It is affirmed upon the cross-appeal, and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.