Court Opinion

ID: 9965649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-03 00:00:46.874328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:24.324547
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40647           Document: 47-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/02/2024

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit
                                  ____________                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                   No. 23-40647                          May 2, 2024
                                 Summary Calendar
                                 ____________                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk
United States of America,

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                         versus

Adam Roy Moreno,

                                           Defendant—Appellant.
                  ______________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 2:18-CR-1375-1
                  ______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adam Roy
Moreno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno has not filed a response.

      _____________________
      *
          This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40647          Document: 47-1    Page: 2    Date Filed: 05/02/2024

                                 No. 23-40647

       During the pendency of this appeal, Moreno completed the sentence
imposed on revocation of supervised release and was released from custody.
Because he has not shown that he will suffer collateral consequences as
a result of the revocation of his supervised release and because no additional
term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal does not present
a case or controversy, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Spencer v. Kemna,
523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).
       Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

                                      2