Court Opinion

ID: 7432747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:55:33.943087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:29.665480
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 12, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent cross-petitioner is granted in the amount of $250.00.
ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.