Court Opinion

ID: 9409432
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-18 12:08:19.270204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:50.379573
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-23-00305-CV

                                  In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

                      ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s

failure to set for hearing his plea to the jurisdiction. Having reviewed the petition and the record

provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also

Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); In re Smith, No. 03-14-00478-CV, 2014 WL 4079922, at *2

(Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 13, 2014, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus relief when relator

failed to provide sufficient record from which to evaluate claim for mandamus relief); In re

Halley, No. 03-15-00310-CV, 2015 WL 4448831, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 14, 2015)

(orig. proceeding) (concluding that a six-month delay did not constitute an unreasonable length

of time under “failure to rule” analysis).

                                              __________________________________________
                                              Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: July 13, 2023