Court Opinion

ID: 9546193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:26:02.103347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:16:07.428438
License: Public Domain

HUNTLEY, Justice,
dissenting.
When this case was decided on summary judgment in the district court, the judge and parties were not aware of Chapter 12, Title 6, Idaho Code.1 This statute is particularly applicable to the facts of this case, but was not addressed or argued by the parties on motion for summary judgment. In this unique situation I would vacate the summary judgment and remand to the district court to reconsider the motion for summary judgment in light of Chapter 12, Title 6, Idaho. The issue on remand would be whether any material facts are in issue as to whether Sun Valley's guide[s] violated the duty “to conform to the standard of care expected of members of his profession.”
BISTLINE, J., concurs.

. Defendant’s counsel claimed at oral argument that this chapter was not indexed in the Idaho Code. We have verified that claim and note that the chapter was not included in the index until the latest index volume, received by this Court in July, 1984.