Court Opinion

ID: 933592
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-26 19:17:48.116343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:05.774553
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  William Joe Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Johnson,
  
  No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be
   
   *306
   
  fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.