Court Opinion

ID: 9778673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 21:15:55.402182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:12.480826
License: Public Domain

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DICE, Judge.
We have again reviewed the record in light of appellant’s motion for rehearing, and remain convinced that the facts do not bring this case within the exception to the pistol law, Art. 484, supra, which excludes from its operation “the carrying of arms on one’s own premises.”
We are unable to agree that a tenant who carries a pistol upon the grass, sidewalks, driveway, and parking lot jointly used by all tenants of a large apartment complex, such as the one described herein, is on “one’s own premises,” within the meaning of the statute.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.