Court Opinion

ID: 3902892
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:32:46.31344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:23.896660
License: Public Domain

The charging part of the indictment is as follows: "Jess Bales, John Connally and W.B. Prewett . . . did then and there unlawfully assemble and meet together with the intent and purpose to aid each other to repair to the vicinity of the residence of Mrs. Ann McVicker and there disturb the said Mrs. Ann McVicker, Mrs. Laura Shook and Mrs. W.L. Hudspeth, inmates thereof, by loud, unusual and unseemly noise; and they did then and there by such means disturb the said Mrs. Ann McVicker and the other inmates of such residence in the enjoyment of her and their right to peace, quiet, good order and freedom from disturbance."
Appellant moves in arrest of judgment, alleging the insufficiency of the indictment, and especially pointing out the fact that it does not allege that Mrs. McVicker had or owned the residence; that the pleading is vague and inferential. We are of opinion that the motion should have been sustained. See Follis v. State, 37 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Luter v. State, 32 Tex. Crim. 69; Blackwell v. State, 30 Tex.Crim. Rep.. It will be noticed from a reading of the indictment that it does fail to allege that Mrs. McVicker owned any residence or occupied a house as a residence, and it further fails to allege that they went to the residence of Mrs. McVicker. Under *Page 313 
the authorities cited we are of opinion that the motion should have been sustained.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
Reversed and remanded.
Brooks, Judge, absent.