Court Opinion

ID: 989990
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:14:53.722625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:18.460186
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-7942

SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICK KEOHANE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF MARYLAND,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-95-3110-JFM)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                  Decided:   July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Rendelman v. Keohane, No. CA-95-3110-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2