Court Opinion

ID: 2918636
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 23:25:52.177272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:38:26.828840
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-09-00084-CR

NO. 12-09-00085-CR

NO. 12-09-00086-CR

NO. 12-09-00087-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EDDIE LAMON BLACK,§
	APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
APPELLANT

V.§
	JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE§
	SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

	These appeals are being dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant pleaded guilty to
aggravated robbery in four cases.  Sentence was imposed in each case on January 29, 2009.
	Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of
appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless
a motion for new trial is timely filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Where a timely motion for new
trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the sentence is imposed
or suspended in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).  Appellant did not file a motion for new trial
in any of the four cases.  Therefore, his notices of appeal were due to have been filed on or before
February 28, 2009.  However, Appellant did not file his notices of appeal until March 24, 2009 and
did not file a motion for extension of time to file his notices of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule
of Appellate Procedure 26.3.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 (appellate court may extend time for filing
notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after deadline for filing notice of appeal, appellant files notice
of appeal in trial court and motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) in
appellate court).
	On March 25, 2009, this court notified Appellant that the information received in these
appeals does not reflect that his notices of appeal were timely filed or that he filed a motion for an
extension to time to file the notices of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2, 26.3.  Appellant was notified
further that the appeals would be dismissed unless the information in the appeals was amended on
or before April 6, 2009 to show the jurisdiction of this court.  The deadline for amendment has
passed, and Appellant has neither complied with our notice or otherwise responded to it.
	Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except as
provided by Rule 26.3, the appeals must be dismissed.  See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210
(Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Accordingly,
the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  
Opinion delivered April 8, 2009.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

 

 
(DO NOT PUBLISH)