Court Opinion

ID: 804738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-07-19 20:14:45+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:48.869712
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUL 19 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                      No. 10-10247

               Plaintiff - Appellee,           D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02746-DCB-GEE-1

  v.
                                               MEMORANDUM *
JESUS ORLANDO HERNANDEZ-
RAMIREZ, AKA Jesus Orlando
Hernandez, AKA Jesus Hernandez-
Ramirez,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted July 17, 2012 **

Before:        SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

       Jesus Orlando Hernandez-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction

and 51-month sentence for attempted illegal reentry by a previously removed alien,

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Hernandez-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds

for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    10-10247