Court Opinion

ID: 673672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:51:28+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:26.110565
License: Public Domain

28 F.3d 1212
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Dennis Lee WOOTEN, Petitioner Appellant,v.C.L. WOODARD;  Mike Easley;  Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.;  JimHunt, Governor, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6217.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 21, 1994.Decided June 21, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.  (CA-94-94)
Dennis Lee Wooten, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, C.J., and CHAPMAN, Sr. C.J.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Wooten v. Woodard, No. CA-94-94 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 1994).  We deny Wooten's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED