Court Opinion

ID: 4273925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-10 12:04:05.16397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:40.541157
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 16-1373V
                                    Filed: October 19, 2017
                                        UNPUBLISHED

    NEELY H. COOKE,
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                        Petitioner,                          Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
    v.

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.

Temple Witt Cabell, Cabell Law Firm, P.C., Richmond, VA, for petitioner.
Kathryn Ann Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On October 20, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an October 24, 2013 influenza (“flu”) vaccination.
On March 30, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to
petitioner based on respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 22.)

       On July 31, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
No. 28.) Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $18,600.00 and attorneys’
costs in the amount of $1,190.94. (Id. at Petitioner’s Exhibit D and E.) In accordance

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
with General Order #9, petitioner's counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-
pocket expenses. Thus, the total amount requested is $19,790.94.

        On August 31, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF
No. 30-1.)3 Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.” Id. at 2. Respondent “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special
Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees
and costs.” Id. at 3.

        Petitioner has filed no reply.

       The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested rates. However, some costs and
tasks are found to be unreasonable.

       Mr. Cabell billed a total of 6.0 hours for travel at a rate of $400 per hour on
October 20, 2016, to “Deliver Petitioner to USFC in Washington, DC and return travel to
Richmond” resulting in a requested amount of $2,400.00. (ECF No. 28-4 at 1). Mr.
Cabell also seeks $146.50 in costs associated with this travel. (ECF No. 28-5 at 1).
The undersigned find this charge unreasonable, in part because traveling six hours to
deliver a petition to the Court when multiple alternative, more efficient, avenues are
available, including electronically filing the petition or opting for overnight delivery. This
results in a reduction of $2,546.50.

      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

      Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $17,244.444 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
Temple W. Cabell.

3
  Respondent’s response was filed on August 31, 2017, in conjunction with an Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Fee Response Out of Time. (ECF No. 30.)
4
  This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

                                                      2
        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                          Chief Special Master

5
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                     3