Court Opinion

ID: 4652130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-01-19 15:02:55.598975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:45.617468
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  January 19, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21I0108. UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL                      GASES,       INC.    v.   ACTION
     INDUSTRIES, INC. et al.

      Plaintiff Universal Industrial Gases, Inc. sued defendants Action Industries,
Inc. and Allegheny Casualty Company for breach of contract and related claims, and
the defendants moved to dismiss Universal’s complaint. In a single order, the trial
court granted the motion as to both defendants, on the ground that the complaint is
barred by OCGA § 14-11-711 (a).1 A counterclaim by Action Industries remains
pending before the trial court. After the trial court issued a certificate of immediate
review, Universal filed this timely application for interlocutory review, seeking to
appeal the dismissal of its complaint.
      In its order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss, the trial court expressly
directed the entry of a final judgment and determined there is no just reason for delay
as to the dismissal of Universal’s claims against Allegheny Casualty. See OCGA § 9-
11-54 (b) (“When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as
a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are
involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but
fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there
is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.”).

      1
         That statute provides: “A foreign limited liability company transacting
business in this state may not maintain an action, suit, or proceeding in a court of this
state until it is authorized to transact business in this state.”
As a result, the order is directly appealable and not subject to the interlocutory appeal
requirements as to those claims. See Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton Co., 242 Ga. 242,
243 (248 SE2d 641) (1978); Sam’s Wholesale Club v. Riley, 241 Ga. App. 693, 695
(1) (527 SE2d 293) (1999). Moreover, the dismissal of Universal’s claims against
Action Industries – in the same trial court order and on the same grounds as the
dismissal of its claims against Allegheny Casualty – may also be raised as part of
such a direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d); see also generally Southeast Ceramics,
Inc. v. Klem, 246 Ga. 294, 295 (1) (271 SE2d 199) (1980) (“[W]hen a direct appeal
is taken, any other judgments, rulings or orders rendered in the case and which may
affect the proceedings below may be raised on appeal and reviewed and determined
by the appellate court.”); Southwest Grease & Oil, Inc. v. Clarkson Power Flow, Inc.,
243 Ga. 140, 140 (252 SE2d 513) (1979) (explaining that Code Ann. §§ 6-701 (a) (1)
and 81A-154 (b) – the predecessors to OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (a) (1)2 and 9-11-54 (b),
respectively – “are to be construed together so that a determination of finality under
the latter satisfies the finality requirement of the former”).
      “This Court will grant a timely application for interlocutory review if the order
complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed
a notice of appeal.” Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486 n. 1 (602 SE2d 246)
(2004). Accordingly, this application for interlocutory review is hereby GRANTED.
Universal shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in
the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). If Universal already has filed a notice of
appeal in the trial court, then it need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial

      2
       OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) authorizes direct appeals to be taken from “[a]ll final
judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below,
except as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” This action does not fall within the
categories of cases governed by OCGA § 5-6-35.
court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the
Court of Appeals.

                                     Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                            Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                      01/19/2021
                                            I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                     the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                            Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                     hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                     , Clerk.