Court Opinion

ID: 806242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-08-08 19:30:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:35.962639
License: Public Domain

N(j)’l‘l+;: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET
MARIE CURIE,
App€llamf,

V.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECT()R,
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE,

Appell€€,

AND

PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
Appellee.

2(`)12-1484
(Reexarninatic)n N<). 95/0()(),427)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Bc)ard of Patent Appeals and Interfcrences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET
MARIE CURIE,

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE V. KAPPOS 2

Appellant,

V.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR,
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
Appellee.

2012-1485
(Reexamination N0. 95/000,443)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Offlce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET
n MARIE CURIE,
Appellant,

V.

DAV`ID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR,
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.,

INSTITUT PASTEU'R & UNIVERSITE V. KAPPOS

Appellee.

2012- 1486
(Reexamination No. 95/000,490)

Appeal from the United States Patent; and Trademark
Offlce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT _PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET
MARIE CURIE,
Appellant,

V.

DAV'ID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR,'
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.,
Appellee.

2012-1487
(Reexamination No. 95/000,491)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE v. KAPPos 4
0N MOTION

ORDER

lnstitut Pasteur & UniVersite Pierre Et Marie Curie
moves to consolidate appeal nos. 2012-1484, 2012-1485,
2012-1486, and 2012-1487 for briefing and argument.

Upon consideration thereof,
IT ls ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted in part to allow consolidated
briefing The parties should file consolidated briefs, with
the covers of their briefs including all four captions. The
cases will be treated as companion cases for purposes of
oral argument, so that they will be heard by; the same
merits panel on the same oral argument calendar.

FoR THE COURT

 

AUG 0 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbal
Date J an Horbaly
` Clerk

cc: Thomas H. Jenkins, Esq.
Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

Michael J ames Twomey, Esq. 5¢\1,$!-‘03
26 "»a‘=s§§'§lt.s.,,,
s

AUG 082012

JAN HURBA|.Y
CLEHK