Court Opinion

ID: 2896329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:42:51.144723+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:49.851476
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0363-CR
                                   NO. 07-08-0364-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL D

                                DECEMBER 8, 2008
                         ______________________________

                          DONALD ELIJAH MATTHEWS, JR.,

                                                               Appellant

                                            v.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                     Appellee
                       _________________________________

             FROM THE 47th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

            NOS. 57, 858-A and 57, 859-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING
                       _______________________________

                              Abatement and Remand
                         _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

       Donald Elijah Matthews, Jr. appeals his convictions for assault and violation of a

protective order. The clerk has filed extensions of time to file the clerk’s records, which

extensions were granted to December 17, 2008. The reporter’s record was due on

November 17, 2008. On December 1, 2008, the Court notified the reporter by letter that

the record was overdue, and in response, the reporter stated that appellant neither

submitted a request for preparation of the record nor made arrangements to pay for it.
       Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 47th District Court

of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

       1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals;

       2. whether appellant is indigent;

       3. whether the appellant is entitled to free appellate records due to his
       indigency;

       4. when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed (given the length of
       trial and size of the record) in a manner that does not unduly delay the
       prosecution of this appeal.

       The trial court shall 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing

the foregoing issues, and 2) cause to be developed supplemental clerk’s records

containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result

of its hearing in this matter.     Additionally, the district court shall then cause the

supplemental records to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 7, 2009.

Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must

be requested before January 7, 2009. Finally, appellant is informed that if he is not

indigent and fails to make arrangements or pay for the reporter’s record, the appeal will be

dismissed. Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).

       It is so ordered.

                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              2