Court Opinion

ID: 3654526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:08:06.858035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:50.546479
License: Public Domain

took time to consider; and after two or three days directed the costs to be paid by the complainant. He said there had been a careless delay on the part of the complainant; and the defendant had a right to ascertain, by putting the complainant to prove, whether there had been such a contract, and whether it had been executed on (362) the side of complainant. He had therefore done nothing amiss, and should not be compelled to pay the costs.
NOTE — See White v. Thompson, 21 N.C. 493; see, also, Tindall v.Mounger, 5 N.C. 290. *Page 319