Court Opinion

ID: 8454638
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:09:09.726003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.514391
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Marion Clarence Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cooper, No. 9:95-cr-00163-SB-1 (D.S.C. May 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.