Court Opinion

ID: 9384491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-04 00:00:20.392658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:53.958240
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40640        Document: 00516698762             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/03/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-40640                          FILED
                                    Summary Calendar                     April 3, 2023
                                    ____________                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Manuel Orozco-Ambriz,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:21-CR-1172-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Orozco-Ambriz has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Orozco-Ambriz has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40640        Document: 00516698762       Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/03/2023

                                   No. 22-40640

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
          The record reflects that Orozco-Ambriz pled guilty to count one of
   the indictment, which charged him with conspiring to possess with intent to
   distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing a
   detectable amount of methamphetamine. The judgment recites, however,
   that Orozco-Ambriz pleaded guilty of “[c]onspiracy to possess with intent to
   distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing
   methamphetamine and more than one kilogram of a mixture or substance
   containing heroin.”     Because Orozco-Ambriz did not plead guilty of
   conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than one kilogram of a
   mixture or substance containing heroin, the case is REMANDED for the
   limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the written judgment. See
   Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; see also United States v. Brune, 991 F.3d 652, 664 n.39
   (5th Cir. 2021).

                                            2