Court Opinion

ID: 8335991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 22:30:46.625499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:31.698887
License: Public Domain

Newburger, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury.
This action was brought on a promissory note given by the defendants. The answer is a tender. The tender was made on the 10th day of July, 1890, and the amount tendered at that time Was one hundred and fifty-three and 50-100 dollars ($153.50), which was paid into court on August 19, 1890. The deposit in *539court should have at least been accompanied by the interest up to the time the deposit was made, for the defendant had the unrestrained use of the money up to that time. Murphy v. Gold Stock Co., 3 N. Y. Supp., 804-806; 24 St. Rep., 123 ; City Court, 1889.
In the case at bar, interest to date of deposit did not accompany the deposit, therefore, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Ehrlich, Oh. J., concurs.