Court Opinion

ID: 9892027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-20 07:11:16.177402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.788146
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-23-00080-CV
                               __________________

      J EDWARDS CONCRETE & CONSTRUCTION LLC, Appellant

                                         V.

             DAVID OLVERA AND SARAH OLVERA, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 22-02-02119-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      J Edwards Concrete & Construction LLC, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal

from a final default judgment, which the trial court signed on February 8, 2023.

      On June 8, 2023, the District Clerk notified the Court that Appellant is not

entitled to appeal without paying the fee for the record and Appellant had failed to

pay or to arrange to pay for the clerk’s record in the appeal. On that same day, we

notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed and we warned

Appellant that we would dismiss the appeal unless it arranged to pay the fee required

                                         1
to file the clerk’s record or it explained that it needed additional time to do so by

July 10, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant then arranged for and paid for

the clerk’s record, and the clerk’s record was filed with this Court on July 19, 2023.

      On July 20, 2023, the Court sent a notice notifying the Appellant that the

Appellant had not made arrangements to pay for and file a Reporter’s Record. On

August 22, 2023, we notified the parties that the Court had still not received a

response to the Court’s notice regarding non-payment for the reporter’s record and

we confirmed that no reporter’s record had been filed. On that same date, we also

notified the Appellant that Appellant’s brief was due on or before Thursday,

September 21, 2023. On September 22, 2023, we notified Appellant that Appellant’s

brief was past due and that if the brief of Appellant and a motion for extension of

time were not filed by Monday, October 2, 2023, the cause would be submitted to

the Court on the clerk’s record alone, and that submission without briefs may result

in dismissal for want of prosecution.

      In the absence of a brief from Appellant or a satisfactory explanation

justifying Appellant’s failure to file a brief and failure to respond to the Court’s

notices, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3, 43.2(f).

                                          2
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 18, 2023
Opinion Delivered October 19, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

                                       3