Court Opinion

ID: 9893680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-29 21:00:30.859449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:40.472651
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 19-4325      Doc: 76         Filed: 10/27/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 19-4325

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        KEITH DARRELL LONG,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Anderson. Donald C. Coggins Jr., District Judge. (8:17-cr-01158-DCC-1)

        Argued: September 19, 2023                                    Decided: October 27, 2023

        Before KING, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ARGUED:       Kimberly Harvey Albro, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC
        DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Kathleen Michelle Stoughton,
        OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
        Appellee. ON BRIEF: Corey F. Ellis, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
        Andrew R. de Holl, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
        ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 19-4325      Doc: 76          Filed: 10/27/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               In this appeal from the criminal judgment entered in April 2019 in the District of

        South Carolina, defendant Keith Darrell Long challenges his convictions and sentence on

        numerous grounds. Based upon guilty pleas, Long was convicted of two offenses, for

        illegal possession of a firearm and drugs. As a result, he was sentenced to 150 months of

        imprisonment, to be followed by six years of supervised release.             Upon careful

        consideration of the various issues, the record on appeal, and the briefs and oral arguments

        of counsel, we are satisfied to affirm the district court’s judgment.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                      2