Court Opinion

ID: 8201471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 23:32:41.469131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:40:56.293226
License: Public Domain

Wilkie, J.
(concurring). I would hold that Hawkins had a state constitutional right to legal counsel at the probation revocation hearing. This is the position taken by Mr. Chief Justice Hallows in his dissenting opinion in State ex rel. Cresci v. H&SS Department,1 with which opinion I joined. However, in the instant case there was a waiver of the right to counsel by Hawkins, and I would, therefore, concur in the result reached.

 (1974), 62 Wis. 2d 400, 415, 215 N. W. 2d 361.