Court Opinion

ID: 1005693
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:00:06.737155+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:56.497738
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

YUL CARTER,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-90-41, CA-00-948-2)

Submitted:    October 18, 2001             Decided:   October 25, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yul Carter, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III, HOLLAND &
KNIGHT, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Yul Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     See United States v. Carter, Nos. CR-90-41; CA-00-948-2

(S.D.W. Va. Apr. 4, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2