Court Opinion

ID: 9830179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:57:11.372753+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:15.120536
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
[5] Appellant has called our attention to the fact that under the pleadings the trial court should have rendered judgment in his favor for the $100 paid to appellee J. J. Mitchell on contract. We think this contention must be sustained, and the judgment is therefore reformed in this particular and judgment here entered in favor of appellant against appellee J. J. Mitchell for that sum. In all other respects the motion for rehearing is overruled. The costs of appeal, however, will stand, as heretofore adjudged, against appellant, since the matter here corrected was not called to the attention of the trial court in the motion for new trial