Court Opinion

ID: 2844451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 18:53:38.091671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:33.400722
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 2-02-482-CR

2-02-483-CR

FRANK THOMAS PIRTZ                     					APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL
 DISTRICT 
COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw And Dismiss The Appeal.”  Although appellant has not signed the motion in compliance  with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, appellant stated at an abatement hearing held in the trial court on August 4, 2003, that he no longer wishes to pursue his appeal. 
Tex. R.
 
App
. P. 42.2(a).  Because the record of that hearing is before us, we suspend rule
 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal.  
Id.;
 
see
 
Tex. R. App. P.
 2.  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 
See
 
Tex. R. App. P.
 43.2(f). 																	

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	
DAY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 
47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 2, 2003							

FOOTNOTES
1:See
 
Tex. R. App. P.
 47.4.