Court Opinion

ID: 8272007
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:35:24.868185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:33.304643
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:.
This case raises the same questions that are involved in the case between the same parties, No. 15 of the March Term. Eor the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Chancellor in that ease the judgment under review herein should be reversed.
For affirmance—None.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoori-iebs, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.