Court Opinion

ID: 542577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:41.549224
License: Public Domain

904 F.2d 700Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charles P. GINN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Dr. FRYE;  John Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-7264.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 7, 1990.Decided:  May 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  B. Waugh Crigler, United States Magistrate.  (C/A No. 89-695-R).
Charles P. Ginn, appellant pro se.
Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va.;    Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Charles P. Ginn appeals from the magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.*   Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate.  Ginn v. Frye, C/A No. 89-695-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 17, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636