Court Opinion

ID: 9323761
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-08 08:10:04.495439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:50.334170
License: Public Domain

In The
                                  Court of Appeals
                         Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                        No. 07-22-00149-CR
                                        No. 07-22-00150-CR

                               RINO REY ACOSTA, APPELLANT

                                                V.

                                 STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                              On Appeal from the 100th District Court
                                     Childress County, Texas
                 Trial Court Nos. 6606 & 6607, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding

                                        December 2, 2022
                       ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                    Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

       Appellant, Rino Rey Acosta, appeals from the trial court’s judgments adjudicating

him guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation.1 The appellate record was originally

due September 8, 2022. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s

record was not. We subsequently granted the reporter an extension to file the reporter’s

record. By letter of October 11, 2022, we admonished the reporter that failure to file the

       1   See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02.
reporter’s record by October 24 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, the

reporter’s record has not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication

with this Court.

       Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring

appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to

preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,

the trial court shall determine the following:

       1.     what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

       2.     why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

       3.     what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of
              those tasks; and

       4.     whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial
              court finds reasonable.

       Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January

2, 2023.

                                                 2
       Should the reporter file the reporter’s record on or before December 16, 2022, she

is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial

court shall not be required to take any further action.

       It is so ordered.

                                                           Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Quinn, C.J., not participating.

                                               3