Court Opinion

ID: 8474744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:09:40.633731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:24.241635
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lashon Maurice Gaither appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gaither, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-10 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2009); see United, States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-36 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 321, 175 L.Ed.2d 212 (2009). We deny Gaither’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.