Court Opinion

ID: 5841848
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 23:19:28.363629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:47.897855
License: Public Domain

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.