Court Opinion

ID: 2218776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:38:54.511764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:10.064806
License: Public Domain

197 Mich. App. 174 (1992)
494 N.W.2d 829
PEOPLE
v.
BLOUNT
Docket No. 151314.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided December 7, 1992, at 9:00 A.M.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy A. Baughman, Chief of Research, Training, and Appeals, and Jeffrey Caminsky, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
*175 Roman S. Karwowski, for the defendant.
Before: HOOD, P.J., and CONNOR and TAYLOR, JJ.
HOOD, P.J.
Defendant pleaded guilty in the Recorder's Court of Detroit of second-degree murder, MCL 750.317; MSA 28.549, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2), in exchange for the dismissal of a charge of first-degree murder, MCL 750.316; MSA 28.548. Pursuant to the parties' sentencing agreement, defendant was sentenced to a term of twenty to forty years plus the mandatory two years for the firearm conviction. He appeals as of right, arguing that the sentence is disproportionate and not individually tailored. We disagree and affirm.
The sentencing guidelines recommended a minimum term of twelve to twenty-five years. The minimum imposed on defendant was within the guidelines and is therefore presumptively proportionate. People v Milbourn, 435 Mich. 630; 461 NW2d 1 (1990); People v Broden, 428 Mich. 343; 408 NW2d 789 (1987).
Further, we note and emphasize that defendant received exactly the sentence to which he previously had agreed and may not now challenge that sentence, because he has made no effort to withdraw his plea. People v Vitale, 179 Mich. App. 420; 446 NW2d 504 (1989); see also People v Nixten, 183 Mich. App. 95; 454 NW2d 160 (1990). A bargain is indeed a bargain. Further, in this case, we have no claim of ineffective assistance of counsel nor any indication that the plea was in any way tainted or that the prosecutor in any way violated the terms of the agreement.
We therefore hold that a defendant who pleads guilty and is sentenced in accordance with a plea *176 bargain and sentencing agreement waives the right to challenge the sentence unless there is also an attempt to withdraw the plea for a sound legal reason.
Affirmed.