Court Opinion

ID: 9375339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-27 16:00:52.016758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:57.988847
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50513         Document: 00516653282             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/23/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-50513
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                               February 23, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Patricia De La Pena,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:22-CR-40-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Patricia De La Pena has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). De La Pena has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50513     Document: 00516653282          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/23/2023

                                   No. 22-50513

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2