Court Opinion

ID: 5387323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 09:32:05.015734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:14.759970
License: Public Domain

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the respondent wife when she was struck by a revolving door in appellant’s store, and by the respondent husband for expenses and loss of services, judgment in respondents’ favor, entered on the verdict of a jury, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Adel, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to establish negligence on the part of the appellant.