Court Opinion

ID: 1001703
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:59:40.673261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:05.642023
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7037

CARROLL E. WADE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ED WRIGHT, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke.    James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-98-705-7)

Submitted:   December 22, 1999              Decided:   June 2, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carroll E. Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Carroll Wade seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Wade v. Wright, No. CA-98-705-7

(W.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1999).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2