Court Opinion

ID: 6144892
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:00:21.36924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:49.350778
License: Public Domain

McAdam, J.
— The commissioners of charities and corrections, as overseers of the poor, are intrusted with an office that requires discretion, and a trust that is to be exercised for the public good. When they bring suit in the exercise of their *114powers, it is under the sanction of their oath of office, and every presumption of good faith attends the proceeding, and hence they are, in such cases, exempt from costs. But where a volunteer impugns the acts of sworn officials and brings actions in their names, founded on an allegation of their neglect of official duty, the most he can claim is that he is “ a person authorized by statute to sue.” He assumes the responsibility of costs which may be awarded against him personally (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 3246), and under the express provisions of section 3271 he may be required to give security for costs (See Board of Commissioners agt. Purdy, 36 Barb., 266).
There is no hardship in this, for if the action is well founded he will have no costs to pay; but if it should prove to be ill-founded, then the unfortunate defendant, who has been harassed by an unwarranted act of a stranger, who sets the machinery of the law in motion against him, will have some hope of obtaining at least part of the expense to which he has been subjected. The motion to require security for costs will, therefore, be granted.