Court Opinion

ID: 9423358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:07:15.541471+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:43.583663
License: Public Domain

Me. Justice Douglas,
concurring.
While I join the opinion of the Court, I reserve decision on one aspect of the problem concerning multi-member districts.
Under the present regime each voter in the district has one vote for each office to be filled. This allows the majority to defeat the minority on all fronts. It is suggested that in multi-member districts each person be able to vote for only one legislator, the theory being that in that way a minority, either political or otherwise, would have a chance tó elect at least one representative.
I am not sure in my own mind how this problem should be resolved. But in •'dew of the fact that appellants claim that multi-member districts of Texas are constructed in such a manner that Negroes are effectively disenfranchised, I would reserve that question for consideration when the case is once again before the District Court.
Me. Justice Claek would affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Me. Justice Harlan and Me. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment of the District Court in its entirety, on the basis of the reasoning contained in Me. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Swann v. Adams, 385 U. S. 440, 447.