Court Opinion

ID: 6347093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-06 00:00:22.614012+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:22.264749
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40669     Document: 00516343948         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/03/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                  No. 21-40669                       June 3, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Hemerson Santiesteban-Delgado,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:21-CR-890-1

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hemerson
   Santiesteban-Delgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santiesteban-Delgado has not

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40669     Document: 00516343948          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/03/2022

                                   No. 21-40669

   filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
   of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
   the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2