Court Opinion

ID: 1258956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:15:50.212198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:32.891764
License: Public Domain

547 S.E.2d 811 (2001)
Rosalyn GLENN-ROBINSON
v.
Robert Charles ACKER; City of Durham, North Carolina.
No. 16P01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 5, 2001.
Joel M. Craig, Thomas H. Lee, Durham, for Acker.
Alexander Charns, Karen Bethea-Shields, Durham, for Glenn-Robinson.
Patrick W. Baker, Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr., Durham, for City of Durham.
Prior report: 140 N.C.App. 606, 538 S.E.2d 601.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant (Acker) in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of April 2001."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Acker) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of April 2001."