Court Opinion

ID: 754961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-18 02:49:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:07.830127
License: Public Domain

145 F.3d 1340
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ruth SCHERFENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 97-17274.D.C. No. CV-97-00517-LKK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 1998.**Decided May 18, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding.
Before SCHROEDER, TROTT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Ruth Sherfenberg appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of her action against the Internal Revenue Service under the Freedom of Information Act.  We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on October 20, 1997.

3
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3