Court Opinion

ID: 4239050
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-25 01:00:22.318123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:39.127989
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10307      Document: 00514320694         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/24/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-10307                              FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                     January 24, 2018
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ORTEGA, also known as Tachis,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:16-CR-286-11

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Jose Ortega has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortega
has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ortega’s response. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10307    Document: 00514320694    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/24/2018

                                No. 17-10307

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2