Court Opinion

ID: 7349838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 01:49:20.494436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:26.688069
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The complaint for a first cause of action sets forth the failure of defendant to pay rent of an apartment leased to him, and for a second cause of action sets forth failure to pay for telephone service to the value of $3.25. At the trial the first cause of action was sharply litigated, and we agree with the trial justice that the defendant established his defense to any rent under the lease set forth in the complaint, though perhaps the plaintiff may have a cause of action under an oral lease for another apartment. The trial justice, however, overlooked the fact that near the beginning of the trial the defendant conceded his liability upon the second cause of action.
The judgment must therefore Be modified, by reversing the judgmnt in favor of the defendant, and directing judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $3.25, without costs of this appeal to either party.