Court Opinion

ID: 8908540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 02:17:18.056168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:22.242297
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
The Decision and Order of the Board is reported at 233 NLRB No. 82.
The underlying facts giving rise to the controversy are carefully explored in the decision of Administrative Law Judge Jenson. In our opinion, there was more than ample evidence to support the conclusion that the Union illegally discriminated against its involved member, violating § 8(a)(3) of the Act, and thus engaged in grossly unfair labor practices, as to the involved employee, within the meaning of § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) and § 2(6) and (7) of the Act. Accordingly, we reject the contentions made by the Union in its Petition to Review and grant the Board’s Cross-Application for the enforcement of its Order. The Board’s Order will, by this Court, be
ENFORCED.