Court Opinion

ID: 3954120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:15:37.303972+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:37.044852
License: Public Domain

Mrs. Shelton, the appellee, brought this suit against appellant Roy Bible in the form of trespass to try title to two tracts of land, aggregating 460 acres. The plaintiff sued out a writ of sequestration, and the defendant gave a replevy bond. The defendant Bible first filed a general denial and plea of not guilty, but afterwards filed a disclaimer of title, and alleged that he was merely a tenant of the plaintiff, and asked for judgment for his costs. There was a jury trial, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the land in controversy, and for $300 with 6 per cent, interest thereon, for the rental value of the land; and the defendant Bible and the surety on his replevy bond have appealed.
We sustain the fifth assignment of error, which complains of the action of the trial court in rendering judgment against the surety on the replevy bond for the entire rental value of the premises during the year 1920, although the bond was not executed and approved until the 13th day of February, 1920. Sureties on such bonds are liable only for such damages, or for liability on behalf of the principal, which accrue after the execution of the bond. Bateman v. Hip, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 405,111 S.W. 971; Wandelohr v. Grayson County Natl. Bank (Tex.Civ.App.)106 S.W. 413, affirmed by the Supreme Court, 102 Tex. 20, 108 S.W. 1154, reversed in part by the Supreme Court on another point, 102 Tex. 20,112 S.W. 1046.
It does not appear from the testimony that the rental value of the property during the portion of the year 1920, which elapsed after the execution of the bond, was as much *Page 249 
as its rental value for the entire year, nor does the testimony show what the difference in such rental value would be. Hence we conclude that the surety is entitled to have the case reversed; and this we think renders it necessary to reverse and remand the entire case.
Many of the other assignments of error relate to questions of pleading, and we do not think they point out reversible error. At any rate, the pleadings can be amended, and the questions referred to eliminated upon another trial. Assignments presenting other questions are overruled.
For the reasons stated, the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.