Court Opinion

ID: 990311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:19:29.923738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:44.014100
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6411

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT GARFIELD MCKEITHAN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-91-106-R, CA-95-851)

Submitted:   August 22, 1996           Decided:     September 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Garfield McKeithan, Appellant Pro Se.  John Granville
Douglass, Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. McKeithan, Nos. CR-91-106-
R; CA-95-851 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2