Court Opinion

ID: 2906640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 00:20:45.398929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:10.166110
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-08-091 CR

____________________

KEVIN JOHN KADLECEK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 9th District Court 
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-05-05673-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 On June 23, 2008, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained
why he needed time for filing the record.  The appellant did not file a response.  It appears
that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  See Tex. R. App. P.
20.2.  There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
	APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                                            __________________________________
                                                                                              CHARLES KREGER
                                                                                                         Justice

Opinion Delivered October 1, 2008
Do not publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.