Court Opinion

ID: 9530308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:58:59.261056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:04.340150
License: Public Domain

Ringold, J.
(concurring)—I concur in the result.
Whether evidence is relevant is within the discretion of the trial court. There are no precise rules. Each case *246depends upon its own circumstances and the relation of such facts to the ultimate issue.
"... All facts are admissible in evidence which afford reasonable inferences or throw any light upon the contested matter. Relevancy means the logical relation between proposed evidence and the fact to be established. ..." Keisel v. Bredick, 192 Wash. 665, 74 P.(2d) 473.
Chase v. Beard, 55 Wn.2d 58, 61, 346 P.2d 315 (1959); 5 R. Meisenholder, Wash. Prac., Evidence Law and Practice, at 2 (1965).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in considering the relevancy and admissibility of the evidence to which objection is made.