Court Opinion

ID: 9366875
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-29 08:11:48.423742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:55.653003
License: Public Domain

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 26, 2023.

                                      In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-22-00563-CV

                     D & R ENTERPRISE, INC., Appellant

                                         V.

   SCF RC FUNDING IV, LLC; ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY
    TRUST, LLC (A/K/A) SCF REALTY CAPITAL LLC AND MESA
 FORTUNE, INC.; US ASSETS ACQUISITIONS, LLC D/B/A US ASSETS,
 LLC; US ASSETS, INC.; JEFFEREY LOVE A/K/A JEFF LOVE; DAVID
            FETTNER; AND GREG SEIBERT, Appellees

                   On Appeal from the 152nd District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2021-47415

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This appeal is from three interlocutory orders signed June 24, 2022; June 28,
2022; and July 13, 2022 respectively dismissing claims pleaded against appellee
David Fettner, denying a request to dismiss affirmative defenses pled by David
Fettner; and denying reconsideration of the first two orders. No final judgment is in
the appellate record, and the interlocutory orders lack any apparent basis for being
immediately appealable. Although the record reflects appellant sought permission
from the trial court to take an immediate interlocutory appeal from those three orders
pursuant to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(d) and Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 28.3, there is no written order in the record in which the trial
court grants permission for any such appeal. Such an order is required for this court
to be able to exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. See Hebert v. JJT Constr., 438
S.W.3d 139, 142 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.).

      On January 9, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was
subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction unless any party
demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). The parties
filed no response.

      Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

                                          2