Court Opinion

ID: 5699136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:37:59.195771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:17.748606
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion to restrain the picketing of its premises pendente lite and denying appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Metzger Co. v. Fay, 4 A D 2d 436.) Palermo v. Motto (283 App. Div. 746), relied on by appellants, is readily distinguishable on its facts. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [8 Misc 2d 538.]