Court Opinion

ID: 5618748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:27:48.283217+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:19.921339
License: Public Domain

Luke, J.
A bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial in a criminal ease where the only trial had was upon the issues raised by a plea in abatement, the verdict being against the plea. There is no difference in principle between a verdict finding against a plea in abatement, and a finding against such a plea by the judge (where, by consent, he passes upon the plea without the intervention of a jury), and it is well settled that the striking of a plea in abatement is not a “final” judgment within the meaning of section 6138 of the Civil Code of 1910. McElroy v. State, 123 Ga. 546 (51 S. E. 596); W. & A. R. Co. v. Williams, 146 Ga. 27 (90 S. E. 478); English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 745 (105 S. E. 292). A plea of res judicata is a plea in abatement.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur. .