Court Opinion

ID: 9671099
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:30:54.701357+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:08.162532
License: Public Domain

*267On Appellees’ Motion for Rehearing.
Our original opinion is corrected so as to describe the property in controversy as being the difference between 2⅜080⅛3 of the minerals in and under 445 acres of land in Coke County, Texas, subject to an existing oil and gas lease, which the Trial Court awarded appellants and 50%64oths mineral interest therein subject to such lease which appellants contend the Trial Court should have awarded them.
Judgment will he entered herein enlarging the recovery as above indicated. In all other respects appellees’ motion for rehearing is overruled.
Granted in part and in part overruled.