Court Opinion

ID: 8480046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:03:23.449859+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.505681
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Claudio Otero, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Otero, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-6 (W.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2008 & July 15, 2009). We deny Ote-ro’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.