Court Opinion

ID: 7028340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 06:03:56.294292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:10:51.477620
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Rodrick Bernard Chatman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for civil or criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chatman v. McVey, No. CA-95-1285-7 (W.D.Va. Sept 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.