Court Opinion

ID: 4395366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-09 16:01:50.772889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:46.897949
License: Public Domain

United States Navy-Marine Corps
           Court of Criminal Appeals
                          _________________________

                            UNITED STATES
                                Appellee

                                       v.

                            Kyle M. INES
                         Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy.
                               Appellant

                              No. 201900013

     Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
                            Decided: 17 April 2019.
                              Military Judge:
                 Captain Jonathan T. Stephens, JAGC, USN.
   Sentence adjudged 6 September 2018 by a general court-martial con-
   vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
   judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: reduc-
   tion to E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 6
   years, 1 and a dishonorable discharge.
                             For Appellant:
                 Commander Robert D. Evans, JAGC, USNR.
                                For Appellee:
                             Brian K. Keller, Esq.
                          _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
                          _________________________

   1The   Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 36 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
                     United States v. Ines, No. 201900013

               Before FULTON, HITESMAN, and GERDING,
                        Appellate Military Judges.

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
  The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.

                                FOR THE COURT:

                                RODGER A. DREW, JR.
                                Clerk of Court

                                       2