Court Opinion

ID: 990141
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:16:39.122216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:05.432733
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6388

RALPH ALEXANDER-EL,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WARREN, Correctional Dietary Sergeant; FOSTER,
Correctional Dietary Sergeant,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-96-459-AW)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Alexander-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Alexander-El v. Warren, No. CA-96-459-AW (D. Md. Feb. 26,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2