Court Opinion

ID: 7433904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:56:49.597324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:30.434223
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 4, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that *808there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly, the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.