Court Opinion

ID: 4420635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-26 18:00:22.664115+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:48.321450
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-50531      Document: 00515051001         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/26/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 18-50531                           FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   July 26, 2019
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                           Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELIJAH EMMANUEL DICKERSON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:17-CR-237-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Elijah Emmanuel Dickerson has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Dickerson’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time response is
GRANTED, and he has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Dickerson’s

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-50531    Document: 00515051001     Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/26/2019

                                 No. 18-50531

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2