Court Opinion

ID: 8456844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:16:06.329345+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.837211
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. .
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leroy Maurice Deveaux appeals from the district court’s orders granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on the crack cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines and denying reconsideration. The district court reduced Deveaux’s sentence to the minimum of the amended Guidelines range. Deveaux asserts that the district court erred in failing to further reduce his sentence. Deveaux’s argument *596is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED