Court Opinion

ID: 588399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:33.417156
License: Public Domain

972 F.2d 342
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Daniel R. TINSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.David A. WILLIAMS;  Attorney General of Virginia,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6201.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 12, 1992Decided:  August 7, 1992

Malcolm G. Crawford, Lexington, Virginia, for Appellant.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Daniel R. Tinsley seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Tinsley v. Williams, No. CA-91-260-R (W.D. Va.  Jan. 17, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED