Court Opinion

ID: 7510308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:38:29.428699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:24.191940
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We reverse appellant’s first degree murder conviction on the ground that the defense’s proffered jury instruction concerning the privilege of non-retreat in the home should have been given because the doctrine applies to premises surrounding the home, Pell v. State, 97 Fla. 650, 122 So. 110 (1929); Danford v. State, 53 Fla. 4, 43 So. 593 (1907); Redondo v. State, 380 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1118 (Fla.1980), and to co-occupants as well as intruders, Hedges v. State, 172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965); State v. Bobbitt, 389 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
The trial court’s dismissal of the second and third counts of the indictment, display of a firearm while committing of felony, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, is also reversed upon the authority of State v. Thompson, 390 So.2d 715 (Fla.1980), holding that the state is not required to prove the lack of an exemption as an element of the offense.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.