Court Opinion

ID: 568244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.339147
License: Public Domain

944 F.2d 902
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Frizell STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Wade D. BLANKENSHIP, Warden, D.L. Smith, Assistant Warden,R.L. Chewning, Officer, R.A. Young, RegionalAdministrator, E.C. Morris, DeputyDirector, Department ofCorrections,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7072.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.Decided Sept. 16, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-90-635-R)
Frizell Stephens, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denying his motion for reconsideration.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Stephens v. Blankenship, CA-90-635R (W.D.Va. Mar. 28 and Apr. 25, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.