Court Opinion

ID: 9899685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-17 16:01:20.046298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:47.880252
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1574
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                                   Pearson Patrick

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                                 ____________

                         Submitted: November 14, 2023
                           Filed: November 17, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Juges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Pearson Patrick appeals the 396-month sentence imposed by the district court1
after he pled guilty to child pornography offenses. His counsel has moved for leave

      1
      The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

       Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a
substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors
listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See
United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (substantive
reasonableness of sentence reviewed for abuse of discretion; abuse of discretion
occurs when district court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight
to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing
appropriate factors).

      We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                      ______________________________

                                         -2-