Court Opinion

ID: 3126888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:29:13.995165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:33.309744
License: Public Domain

NUMBERS 13-09-00337-CR
                                    13-09-00338-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

PATRICK HUGHES,                                                         Appellant,

                                         v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 148th District Court
                    of Nueces County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Patrick Hughes, attempted to perfect appeals from a conviction for

possession of cocaine and tampering with or fabricating physical evidence. We dismiss

the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
       The trial court imposed sentences in these matters on March 20, 2009. Appellant

filed notices of appeal on May 19, 2009. On October 15, 2009, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellant that it appeared that the appeals were not timely perfected and that the

appeals would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date

of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not filed a response to the Court’s

directive.

       Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2).

The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the

deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

       Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due

to have been filed on or before April 20, 2009. See TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant

did not file a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 and did not file his notice of appeal until May 19, 2009.

       This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

                                              2
jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant’s

notice of appeal was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

       Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability

of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . ANN .

art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1999).

       The appeals are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                         PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
14th day of January, 2010.

                                             3