Court Opinion

ID: 9555945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-15 18:09:19.580475+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:37:30.806183
License: Public Domain

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                  NO.    2023    KW     0601

VERSUS

RUBEN       VAN    DYKE                                                                AUGUST             23,     2023

In    Re:          Ruben        Van       Dyke,           applying       for    supervisory               writs,       19th
                   Judicial              District          Court,        Parish       of     East        Baton     Rouge,

                   No.    05- 13- 0002-.

BEFORE:            McCLENDON,             HESTER,          AND       MILLER,    JJ.

        WRIT       DENIED           ON    THE     SHOWING            MADE.     Relator        failed       to    include
a     file -stamped                 copy        of        the     application              for      postconviction

relief,           the    district           court'         s    ruling,        the    State' s           response,        if

any,        the    bill        of    information,                the     commitment            order,       the       trial

transcript,              pertinent              district              court     minutes,           and     any        other

portion           of     the        district          court           record    that        might        support        the
claims        raised           in    the        writ        application.             Therefore,            this       court

cannot            adequately                review              the      ruling        at          issue         herein.
Supplementation                 of       this        writ       application          and/ or        an    application

for     rehearing              will       not        be    considered.               See      Uniform           Rules     of

Louisiana          Courts           of    Appeal,              Rules    2- 18. 7 &         4- 9.      In    the       event

relator          elects        to    file    a       new       application       with       this     court,       he may
do     so    without           the       necessity              of  obtaining          a      return        date.    Any
future        filing       on        this    issue             should include          the         entire       contents

of    this        application,              the      missing           items    noted        above,        and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                               PMC

                                                               CHH
                                                               SMM