Court Opinion

ID: 4665697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-08 19:00:36.993746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:06.975940
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-40826     Document: 00515769858         Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/08/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                                                         FILED
                                  No. 19-40826                       March 8, 2021
                               Conference Calendar                  Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                         Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Angel Garcia-Huerta,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:19-CR-406-1

   Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jose Angel Garcia-Huerta has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Huerta has filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-40826     Document: 00515769858          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/08/2021

                                   No. 19-40826

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as
   well as Garcia-Huerta’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
   the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2