Court Opinion

ID: 9640606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 17:09:43.190468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:31.030361
License: Public Domain

GARRETT, Associate Judge (specially concurring).
I eoneur in the conclusion reached in these consolidated eases, and am in general agreement with the statement of facts and the reasoning of the opinion. Consequently I concur specially only to state that appellant C. J. Tower & Sons, in their assignments of error, have hero questioned the constitutionality of the Anti-Dumping Act of 1921 solely upon the grounds: (a) That it provides for the taking of property without due process of law because the duties provided therein are claimed to bo penal in character, and (b) that the duties “axe not uniform throughout the land.”
1 feel that these assignments of error are not well taken, but have given no consideration to any other theories respecting the constitutionality of the act, because, as presented before tMs court, such consideration was not required.