Court Opinion

ID: 4107897
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-16 14:04:20.909208+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:42.898108
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                   NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                   FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                   DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DONALD R. LEGRANDE,

              Appellant,

 v.                                                        Case No. 5D16-1606

STATE OF FLORIDA,

              Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 9, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Orange County,
Keith A. Carsten, Judge.

Donald R. Legrande, Lowell, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

       Donald R. LeGrande appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction

relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds

One, Four, and Five.       However, because the record does not conclusively refute

LeGrande’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion for new trial and

failing to request a limiting jury instruction indicating that the “principals” instruction did
not apply to conspiracy, we reverse the summary denial of Grounds Two and Three and

remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting those claims or for

an evidentiary hearing. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (“[A]

defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1)

the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to

no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient.” (citing Maharaj v.

State, 684 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1996))). As two of LeGrande’s claims require reversal for

attachment of the record or evidentiary hearing, we also remand Ground Six, which

alleges cumulative error, for further consideration.

       AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.

                                              2