Court Opinion

ID: 670843
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:39:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:05.726220
License: Public Domain

25 F.3d 1038NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Karl Thomas BELFIELD, a/k/a Karl X. Belfield, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.;  Lewis W. Hurst;  John A. Brown;Gail Y. Browne;  Jacqueline F. Fraser;  EdwardMurray, Director of Department ofCorrections, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6258.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  April 21, 1994.Decided:  May 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, District Judge.  (CA-94-94-R)
Karl Thomas Belfield, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Belfield v. Jackson, No. CA-94-94-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 16, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED