Court Opinion

ID: 9512294
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:13:05.081038+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:20.972184
License: Public Domain

CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶44 I concur in the Court’s opinion that under the circumstances of this case the admission of drug use at Sage’s house was not harmless error and, thus, the conviction should be reversed.
¶45 However, I dissent from the Court’s holding regarding the photographs. Because the Court has reversed the conviction based on the marijuana evidence, it was not necessary to address the admission of the photographs. I would not reach this issue.
¶46 Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.