Court Opinion

ID: 9394349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-13 21:00:19.225153+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:59.106417
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1719      Doc: 41        Filed: 05/12/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 21-1719

        ADEL M. ABDELHAMID,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy,

                            Defendant - Appellee,

                     and

        OMAR R. LOPEZ, Director; NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE,
        Agency; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Agency,

                            Defendants.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00408-LMB-TCB)

        Submitted: April 3, 2023                                       Decided: May 12, 2023

        Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Ellen K. Renaud, ALAN LESCHT AND ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington,
        D.C., for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Meghan Loftus, Assistant
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1719      Doc: 41         Filed: 05/12/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,
        Virginia, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1719         Doc: 41     Filed: 05/12/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              Adel M. Abdelhamid appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment

        to the Secretary of the United States Department of the Navy in Abdelhamid’s civil action

        under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to

        2000e-17, in which he raised claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work

        environment. Abdelhamid also appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.

        P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

        Abdelhamid v. Sec’y of the Navy, No. 1:20-cv-00408-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2021;

        Apr. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

        are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3