Court Opinion

ID: 3006231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-30 20:08:56.297262+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:19.339447
License: Public Domain

Matter of Barbagallo v Cotto-Donis (2015 NY Slip Op 07024)

Matter of Barbagallo v Cotto-Donis

2015 NY Slip Op 07024

Decided on September 30, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2014-08961
 (Docket No. O-25249-13)

[*1]In the Matter of Vivian Barbagallo, appellant, 
vErick Cotto-Donis, respondent.

Heath J. Goldstein, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant.
Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated September 15, 2014. The order of disposition, after an inquest, dismissed the family offense petition.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the petition.
The petitioner commenced this family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. After the respondent failed to appear on a scheduled court date, the matter proceeded to an inquest. At the conclusion of the inquest, the Family Court dismissed the petition for failure to establish a prima facie case, on the ground that the acts complained of occurred more than eight months prior to the filing of the family offense petition.
In 2010, the Legislature amended Family Court Act § 812(1) to provide that in any "proceeding pursuant to this article, a court shall not . . . dismiss a petition . . . solely on the basis that the acts or events alleged are not relatively contemporaneous with the date of the petition" (L 2010, ch 341, § 5). The Family Court thus erred in dismissing the petition on this basis. Accordingly, we reverse the order of disposition, reinstate the petition, and remit the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the petition.
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court