Court Opinion

ID: 5544148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:55:26.193904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:53.088372
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to compel delivery by sheriff to plaintiff of property which the sheriff, on plaintiff’s requisition, had taken in replevin. It appears that the defendant is a warehouseman; that he received the goods in question from one Alexander Agar on storage, and issued his receipt therefor; and that he prevented a delivery to the plaintiff by delivering to the sheriff the notice, affidavit, and undertaking required by section 1704 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The-affidavit was sufficient, for the reasons stated by the learned judge below, and we can see no merit in any of the points raised by the appellant. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.