Court Opinion

ID: 8416759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:46:42.778384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:16.747384
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Charles Millard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Millard v. Tuminelli, No. CA-03-970-8-AW (D.Md. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.