Court Opinion

ID: 1007916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:32:24.087337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:18.834208
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CLEVON TYRONE JOHNSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-
97-309-JFM, CA-02-336-JFM)

Submitted:   June 20, 2002                 Decided:   June 27, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Michael Schad, SCHAD & COOK, Indian Springs, Ohio, for
Appellant.   Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Kevin Michael Schad seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-97-309-JFM;

CA-02-336-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2