Court Opinion

ID: 681087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:37:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:17.523173
License: Public Domain

38 F.3d 1213NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,v.James L. MILLER;  Lieutenant Walker;  Captain McCabe;  GaryDixon;  Deputy Warden French;  Mail Clerk Jones;  SergeantHarris;  Cheryl Moody;  James C. Fox, United States DistrictJudge;  Jim Hunt, Governor;  Clerk Kennedy, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6815.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted August 25, 1994.Decided October 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  W. Earl Britt, District Judge.  (CA-94-84-5-BR)
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a complaint pursuant to a pre-filing injunction.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Tucker v. Miller, No. CA-94-84-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 8, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED