Court Opinion

ID: 173506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-17 18:36:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:25:25.758644
License: Public Domain

Case: 09-11206     Document: 00511205835          Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/17/2010

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                           August 17, 2010
                                     No. 09-11206
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUGO CAMPOS-NAVA, also known as Alfonzo Loya-Nava, also known as
Alfonso Loya-Nava, also known as Daniel Fierro,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:09-CR-98-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo Campos-Nava
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Campos-Nava has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 09-11206   Document: 00511205835 Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/17/2010
                               No. 09-11206

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

                                    2