Court Opinion

ID: 4270812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-27 20:42:24.760764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:45.035453
License: Public Domain

People v Jones (2018 NY Slip Op 03034)

People v Jones

2018 NY Slip Op 03034

Decided on April 27, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 27, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

554 KA 16-00128

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vTORRIE JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (MICHAEL S. DEAL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), rendered January 7, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. We reject that contention inasmuch as "[t]he plea colloquy and the written waiver of the right to appeal signed [and acknowledged in court] by defendant demonstrate that [he] knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal" (People v Farrara, 145 AD3d 1527, 1527 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 997 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court "was not required to explain that the waiver of the right to appeal would specifically encompass the court's discretionary determination on youthful offender status" (People v Saraceni, 153 AD3d 1559, 1560 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 913 [2018]; see generally People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). Thus, defendant's "valid waiver of the right to appeal . . . forecloses appellate review of [the] sentencing court's discretionary decision to deny youthful offender status" (People v Pacherille, 25 NY3d 1021, 1024 [2015]).
Entered: April 27, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court