Court Opinion

ID: 718264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 07:22:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:42:18.761335
License: Public Domain

83 F.3d 1040
Victor DAY, Appellant,v.BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA;  Pill SoonSong, Appellees.
No. 95-4073NE.
United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 1996.Decided May 22, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska;  David Plester, Magistrate Judge.
James C. Zalewski, argued, Lincoln, NE, for appellant.
David R. Buntain, argued, Lincoln, NE (John C. Wiltse, on the brief), for appellee.
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
Victor Day appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Day's civil rights action.  Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F. Supp. 1228 (D.Neb.1995).   Day contends the University of Nebraska's decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights.   Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief.   Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value.   Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion.   See 8th Cir.  R. 47B.