Court Opinion

ID: 9790178
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:48:15.466335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:39.585422
License: Public Domain

CURTIS, J., LANGDON, J., SEAWELL, J., Concurring.
We concur in the conclusion reached in the foregoing opinion. The record before us shows that other members of The State Bar participated in the transaction out of which the present charge against petitioner arose. The whole matter was gone into by the board of governors of The State Bar with the result that all persons involved therein except the petitioner were exonerated from any wrongdoing in connection with said transaction. It would be most unjust and inequitable to penalize 1¡he petitioner under these circumstances. . For this reason, we have given our concurrence to the order dismissing the petition.
Thompson, J., and Shenk, J., dissented.
Rehearing denied. Shenk., J., and Thompson, J., voted for a rehearing.