Court Opinion

ID: 4024307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-15 15:35:01.981257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:02.617336
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                              _________________
                               NO. 09-16-00181-CV
                              _________________

                        IN RE GARY RAY SANGSTER

________________________________________________________________________

                              Original Proceeding
              410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas
                       Trial Cause No. 12-11-11562-CV
________________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      The relator, Gary Ray Sangster, filed a petition for writ of mandamus to

compel the trial court to rule on motions that Sangster filed in a civil suit. We were

subsequently notified that the motions were set by submission and the case had

been set for a non-jury trial. The real party in interest, Jarrod L. Walker, filed a

response suggesting that the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus have

been mooted by the subsequent developments in the trial court. Sangster did not

object to the suggestion of mootness. The petition for writ of mandamus is

                                          1
dismissed as moot without reference to the merits of the issues presented in the

petition.

      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                                       PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 10, 2016
Opinion Delivered August 11, 2016

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                       2