Court Opinion

ID: 7943858
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:18:00.483597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:50.314097
License: Public Domain

Moore, J.
The plaintiff commenced two proceedings for the purpose of recovering taxes paid by him on a description of real estate owned by his wife, but assessed to him, which description included a small parcel of real estate owned by the late Ralph Phelps.
The first of these cases is Bateson v. City of Detroit. The other is the case at bar. In the first of these cases an opinion was handed down which may be found in Bateson v. City of Detroit, 148 Mich. 582. The facts are precisely alike in both cases, and it is not necessary to repeat them here.
The circuit judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant for two reasons, first, because the assessment was invalid, and second, because the payment by Mr. Bateson was a voluntary one.
*606The record discloses that the taxes, for the recovery of which this proceeding is brought, were paid by the plaintiff upon real estate which was not owned by, though it was assessed to, him. It is doubtless true that these payments were made by mistake, and it may be that in equity the plaintiff should be reimbursed for the amount so paid, but with the facts as they are, we think these payments must be held to have been voluntary ones, and that the circuit judge was right in directing a verdict. See 2 Cooley on Taxation (3d Ed.), p. 1495. Keener on Quasi-Contracts, p. 388. Bateson v. City of Detroit, supra.
Judgment is affirmed.
Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.