Court Opinion

ID: 4038249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-28 21:51:55.410761+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:12.680535
License: Public Domain

ORIGINAL       COPY                                              71, r?9- 03
                                                                                o^>
                          Carlos Guadalupe Cantu 01251594
                              899 FM 632 Connally unit
                                 Kendy Texas 78119

                                                     Jan.   6,   2015
court Of Criminal Appeals
PO.    Box    12308

Capital Station
Austin       texas    78711

Dear   Clerk

  Please file this motion and bring to the attension of the
court, Applicant files this his motion in Resquest that this
court court Vacate his nule and viod life sentence,. and 99
years in Cr-3257, count one and two. and correct his judgment
to the 35 years as stated by the respondant, and so that a appeal
of the trial courts judgement may be taken.

Please bring this motion to the attension of the court for a
ruling.

                                      Carlos guadalupe Cantu

                                                                   FCfflMMM. APPEALS
                                                                  JAW 09 2015
                                  CAUSE NO. CR-3257-03-H (1)

                                  CAUSE NO. CR-3257-03-H (2)

                          In The Texas Court Of Criminal Appeals

                                          Austin Texas

                                     Carlos Gudalupe Cantu

                                                 V.

                                         State Of Texas

                 Applicant Motion In Request That This Court Correct

           judgment, Vacate Life Sentence and 99 Years, In its Entirety

   TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Now comes Carlos Guadalupe Cantu, and files this his Motion to correct judgment

in cause number CR-3257-03-H (1) and (2). The applicant               will show this court

that he had original filed an application for Writ of Habeas Corpus                Article :

11.07.    In   the   389th.    Judicial       District   Court of Hidalgo County, Texas,
challenging a Capital Life Sentence for count one and a 99 year sentence for

Attempted Capital Murder, count two-. Applicant's             plead before the court jury
was not guilty to both counts.

   The respondant filed a response to the applications requesting relief               be

denied.   This    court    then      issued   a remand order in CR-3257-H, however, did

not specificly show in        its    White    Card    sent to applicant whether it was for

count one Capital     Murder        Life sentence or count two Attempted Capital Murder

99 year sentence.
   This court then on May 27, 2009 issued a White Card stating that on this day

the court has received the             Clerks    Supplimental   Record,   in   response to the

Remand    Order       issued    by    the   court , and it has been presented to the court

Writ-71,799-01 Trial GT No.: CR-3257-03-H.

   Further on May 27, 2009 this court issued               a    second White Card now stating

that     on   this    day      the   application for 11.07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been

received and presented to the court now Writ 71,799-02 Trial Ct. No. CR-3257-

03-H (1) now count one.

   This       court    then denied applicant's Writ of Habeas based on a Supplimental

Record of the court Clerk, who failed to provide applicant with a copy of any

Supplimental Record filed on applicant's behalf. The applicant was denied by

this     court and the trial court to review or challenge any Supplimental Record

provided by the court clerk for which this court denied applicant relief of

his Capital Life Sentence             for   Capital   Murder,   and '99   year sentence for

Attempted Capital Murder, trial court Cause CR-3257-03-H count one and two.

    The applicant           then     persude with his Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254,

and the respondarit again failed to address the claims raised in his state and

federal applications, and requested the federal 2254 application