Court Opinion

ID: 8677162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:48:38.303665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.870626
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Gill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging violations pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gill v. United States, No. 1:15-cv-00111-RDB (D.Md. Feb. 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

AFFIRMED.