Court Opinion

ID: 3190411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-31 16:05:08.880131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:06.142920
License: Public Domain

People v Liranzo-Marte (2016 NY Slip Op 02546)

People v Liranzo-Marte

2016 NY Slip Op 02546

Decided on March 31, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 31, 2016

Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Gesmer, JJ.

697 919/11

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
vJohan Liranzo-Marte, Defendant-Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Alejandro B. Fernandez of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered April 26, 2012,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 31, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.