Court Opinion

ID: 9669768
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:09:09.857128+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:00.195126
License: Public Domain

Roberds, P. J.
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I was not in accord with the original opinion in this case. In the opinion on Suggestion of Error the majority has eliminated emotions and individual personal traits as factors to be considered in determining liability of employers. I agree with that conclusion. However, I am yet of the opinion that the evidence in this case fails to establish a compensable claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. In my opinion a realistic view of the evidence reveals nothing more than a case where the degenerative diseases of the claimant developed to the point of disablement while she was on duty and that there is no substantial evidence of causal connection between her duties and her disability.
Gillespie, J., Concurs in the views expressed herein.