Court Opinion

ID: 1013524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:02:32.805385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:13.340105
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 04-1394

RONALD E. JARMUTH,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-80-1)

Submitted:   June 2, 2004                   Decided:   June 16, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald E. Jarmuth, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ryan Goodwin, GOODWIN
& GOODWIN, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

              Ronald E. Jarmuth appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for Charles Schwab on his action filed

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (2000).

We   have     reviewed    the   record    and    find   no    reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Jarmuth v. Charles Schwab & Co., No. CA-03-80-1 (N.D.W.

Va. Mar. 3, 2004).          We dispense with oral argument because the

facts   and    legal     contentions     are    adequately     presented    in   the

materials      before    the    court    and    argument     would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED

                                        - 2 -