Court Opinion

ID: 7558993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:54:31.364565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:09.375996
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellant raises two points in this appeal. We reject the point relating to the validity of the plea herein. However, we find merit in the appellant’s claim of lack of notice as to assessment of costs. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the award of costs is stricken. Should the state wish to tax costs it may proceed on remand in accordance with Jenkins.
DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.