Court Opinion

ID: 8070045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:19:32.797586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:14.410786
License: Public Domain

BISCHOFF, J.
Notwithstanding the omission to serve the defendant Charlotte Kirchner with process, both defendants were properly before the court, as appears from the return and from the minutes of the trial; the correctness of the latter being supported by the stipulation of the parties. There was ample evidence to charge both defendants upon the contract for services, and the justice in the judgment rendered has appropriately fixed their personal liability (Code, §§ 3404, 3408), while also establishing the lien. The notice of lien, however, was defective, because of the alternative statement of the “agreed price or value” of the labor performed. Bradley & Currier Co. v. Pacheteau, 71 App. Div. 148, 75 N. Y. Supp. 531. But, while the defect defeats the lien, a personal judgment (Code, § 3412) is properly to be rendered in such a case, and a dismissal of the action is not to be the result. 175 N. Y. 492, 67 N. E. 1080.
The judgment appealed from will be modified so far as to direct personal judgment against the defendants, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs. All concur.