Court Opinion

ID: 9953782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-22 20:09:31.444239+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:33.686943
License: Public Domain

People v Rivera (2024 NY Slip Op 01645)

People v Rivera

2024 NY Slip Op 01645

Decided on March 22, 2024

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 22, 2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, GREENWOOD, NOWAK, AND KEANE, JJ.

199 KA 21-01661

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJOSHUA P. RIVERA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LISA GRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered August 17, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Fernandez, 218 AD3d 1257, 1257-1258 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 1012 [2023]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to his enhanced sentence (see People v Johnson, 215 AD3d 1282, 1282 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 929 [2023]), we nevertheless conclude that the enhanced sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: March 22, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court