Court Opinion

ID: 9595248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:37:27.399238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:33:12.268313
License: Public Domain

Quillian, Judge,'
concurring specially as to Division 2 and the judgment of affirmance. The appellant enumerates as error a portion of the trial judge’s charge to which the following objection was offered: “Your Honor charged that there is no statute in Georgia requiring the operator of an automobile to stop prior to crossing a railroad, and I have to say that I except to that charge.”
The appellant failed to state distinctly the grounds of his objection as required by Code Ann. § 70-207 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 493, 498). Thus, this enumeration of error presents nothing for review. Georgia Power Co. v. Maddox, 113 Ga. App. 642 (2) (149 SE2d 393); Crider v. State, 114 Ga. App. 523 (5) (151 SE2d 792).