Court Opinion

ID: 9891835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-19 18:08:07.053825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.760567
License: Public Domain

People v Sanchez (2023 NY Slip Op 05329)

People v Sanchez

2023 NY Slip Op 05329

Decided on October 19, 2023

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 19, 2023

Before: Kapnick, J.P., Singh, Friedman, González, Shulman, JJ. 

Ind No. 2810/14 Appeal No. 852 Case No. 2017-1020 2020-00388 

[*1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent, 
vDavid Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

Caprice R. Jenerson, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Rachel Lindy of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Brent Yarnell of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered November 20, 2019,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 19, 2023
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.