Court Opinion

ID: 9691790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 09:10:12.688999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:25.767003
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                          TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                 No. 10-23-00241-CR

                       EX PARTE BONNIE RUTH ALLEN

                          From the U.S. District Court
                           Northern District of Texas
                       Trial Court No. 3:2023-CV-01087-B

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On August 14, 2023, Bonnie Ruth Allen, acting pro se, filed a “Request for Summary

Judgment” in this Court, complaining about the dismissal of her application for writ of

habeas corpus that she had filed in the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas. We construe Allen’s “Request for Summary Judgment” as an attempt

to appeal from the federal court’s dismissal of her application for writ of habeas corpus.

We, however, lack jurisdiction over any aspect of federal habeas-corpus proceedings. See

28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); see also Gates v. Lumpkin, No. 10-21-00345-CR, 2021 WL 6067386, at *1

(Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 22, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication);

Slagle v. State, No. 02-16-00097-CR, 2016 WL 1714124, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr.
28, 2016, no pet) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). We therefore

dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

                                                    MATT JOHNSON
                                                    Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson, and
       Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed August 23, 2023
Do not publish
[CR25]

Ex parte Allen                                                                    Page 2