Court Opinion

ID: 6760348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:30:47.54933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:35.015222
License: Public Domain

Douglas, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. It has long been the policy of this court not to disturb a decision of the BTA regarding valuation unless the decision of the BTA is unreasonable or unlawful. Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52, 44 O.O. 2d 30, 239 N.E. 2d 25.1 do not find from the record that the decision of the BTA fails either test. I would affirm the decision of the BTA.
Moyer, C.J., and Sweeney, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.