Court Opinion

ID: 2928582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-12 02:10:59.851583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:39:30.715486
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 21, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 21, 2003.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-03-00269-CR
____________
 
JOEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 861,121
 

 
M
E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
aggravated robbery without an agreed recommendation from the State.  On February 28, the trial court sentenced
appellant to confinement for 30 years in the Institutional Division of the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), by
presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are
no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se
response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Opinion
filed August 21, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates,
Hudson, and Fowler. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R.
App. P. 47.2(b).