Court Opinion

ID: 8418211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 18:27:18.574856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:19.741311
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Frieda Gill appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, holding that substantial evidence supported the conclusion that Gill was not entitled to widows’ benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gill seeks to estop the Commissioner from offsetting her widow’s benefits based on her government pension. Estoppel may not be used against the government as a basis for money claims. See United States v. Hatcher, 922 F.2d 1402, 1410 (9th Cir.1991). Even if a money claim were not involved, estoppel against the government applies only when the person invoking estoppel establishes “affirmative conduct going beyond mere negligence.” Id. (quotations omitted). Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that the misinformation Gill received resulted from negligence, not affirmative misconduct.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.