Court Opinion

ID: 8631199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:37:56.029161+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:46.426301
License: Public Domain

NELSON, Circuit Justice.
The Florida had left pier No. 4 in the North river, and was bound for the Novelty Works, at the foot of Twelfth and Thirteenth streets, in the Bast river. The tug, with several barges in tow, the Gorman being the farthest from her on the larboard side, was also going up the East river, some distance ahead of the Florida, the latter being somewhat nearer the New York side. The witnesses on the part of the barge insist, that when the Florida overtook the tug, although there was sufficient room on either side for her to have passed clear, she passed so near to the Gor-man that her wheel struck the stern of the Gorman and occasioned the damage complained of. The witnesses on the part of the Florida insist, that when she reached within some two hundred feet of the tug, the latter suddenly sheered towards the New York side and produced the collision. The question is a close one on the proofs, and I am not inclined to revise the conclusions arrived at by the court below, which held the Florida in fault. It appears that there was a sloop at the point of collision, between the Florida and the New York shore, and she had to pass between this vessel and the tug, and it may very well be that, in attempting to avoid the sloop, to which she was quite close, she unconsciously inclined towards the tug. The river, was, as usual, filled with vessels, and great care was necessary, in moving in any direction, to avoid a collision. The Florida was going, as admitted by her hands, at the rate of nine miles an hour, which, in the place, and under the circumstances. I am inclined to think was an unreasonable speed.
Decree affirmed.