Court Opinion

ID: 4259177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-28 22:56:02.443721+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:30.331599
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-87,600-01

                      EX PARTE JUAN FRANCISCO PEREZ, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
               CAUSE NO. 16CR1088-83-1 IN THE 56TH DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of tampering with

a government record and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

        This application was previously remanded to the trial court to resolve a factual issue that was

not addressed in counsel’s first affidavit. Counsel, it appears, filed a second affidavit, but it is not

signed or notarized. The trial court’s findings rely on the second affidavit in resolving the disputed

factual issues. However, because of the deficiency in the affidavit, the disputed issues remain

unresolved.
                                                                                                      2

       The application is remanded a second time for the trial court to resolve whether counsel

discussed with Applicant that his plea agreement was for him to go to prison for two years, not

deportation or removal from the United States after which he would be required to stay out of the

country for two years. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

         The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 28, 2018
Do not publish