Court Opinion

ID: 8681344
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:17:49.096509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.545489
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Eagleton, No. 4:14-cv-02444-RBH, 2016 WL 859360 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016). We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED