Court Opinion

ID: 8670325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:58:33.093304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:17.874941
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Dana Ross appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 1:05-cr-00009-jpj-pms-1, 2008 WL 750590 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 17, 2008; entered Mar. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.