Court Opinion

ID: 828770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 20:08:04.601197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:34:47.481220
License: Public Domain

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  April 25, 2011                                                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  142435                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                             Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                       Stephen J. Markman
                                                                                                       Diane M. Hathaway
                                                                                                           Mary Beth Kelly
  DOUGLAS LATHAM,                                                                                          Brian K. Zahra,
           Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices

  v                                                                 SC: 142435
                                                                    COA: 290268
                                                                    Oakland CC: 2004-059653-NO
  BARTON MALOW COMPANY,
          Defendant-Appellant.

  _________________________________________/

        On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010
  judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not
  persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the
  completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. We note that the Court
  of Appeals decision places no limits on the trial court’s discretion to allow the parties to
  conduct further discovery and/or file renewed motions for summary disposition, if
  appropriate.

                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           April 25, 2011                      _________________________________________
           t0418                                                               Clerk