Court Opinion

ID: 1315334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:26:49.426163+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:26:00.613865
License: Public Domain

694 S.E.2d 647 (2010)
WATKINS
v.
ANEGUNDI et al.
No. S10A0153.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 29, 2010.
Watkins, Lourie, Roll & Chance, Lance D. Lourie, Robert D. Roll, Stephen R. Chance, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Michael B. Terry, Kamal Ghali, Atlanta, for appellant.
Huff, Powell & Bailey, Daniel J. Huff, Randolph P. Powell, Jr., Erica S. Jansen, Insley & Race, Kevin P. Race, Moses Kim, McClure, Ramsay, Dickerson & Escoe, John A. Dickerson, Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney, Roger E. Harris, Gretchen H. Wagner, Atlanta, Forrester & Brim, Robert S. Lazenby, Gainesville, for appellees.
THOMPSON, Justice.
This case, in which plaintiff-appellant questions the constitutionality of OCGA § 51-1-29.5 on various grounds, is controlled adversely to plaintiff-appellant by Gliemmo v. Cousineau, 287 Ga. 7, 694 S.E.2d 75 (2010).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.