Court Opinion

ID: 8682049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:40:55.079416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:31.026037
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Eberth Castaneda-Benitez has moved for *203leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011), Castaneda-Beni-tez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *203published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.