Court Opinion

ID: 8453946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:47:50.5479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.104837
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chant'N. Hodge and Harold H. Hodge, Jr., appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil action and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Stephens, No. 8:12-cv-01988-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31 & Mar. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.