Court Opinion

ID: 9830955
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:39:18.579883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:28.573068
License: Public Domain

*6550⅛ Motion of Appellant for a Rehearing.
It is insisted the statement in the opinion affirming the judgment that it appeared from testimony of jurors on the motion for a new trial that the matter of attorney’s fees was mentioned by one of their number, but “further appeared that there was no discussion of such matter,” was “not only not supported by the record, but is in direct conflict with undisputed testimony.” The statement was inaccurate. It should have been that in passing on the motion the trial court had a right to conclude from the testimony that the matter of attorney’s fees was not discussed.
The motion is overruled.