Court Opinion

ID: 9588722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:37:29.278132+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:59.458291
License: Public Domain

Chief Judge VAUGHN
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the majority opinion holding that the evidence was sufficient to take the case to the jury.
For the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Massey, No. 8221SC938, filed 3 May 1983, I dissent from that part of the opinion remanding the case for resentencing. In addition to the reasons I set out in Massey, I must also observe that the question is not even before us in this case. As the majority correctly notes at the outset, the only question raised on appeal is the question of whether the judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for non-suit. Our scope of review in this case is confined to consideration of exceptions set out and made the basis of assignment of error in the record on appeal. Rule 10(a), Rules of Appellate Procedure.