Court Opinion

ID: 7777789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:06:05.993501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:09.129739
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bolender v. State, 658 So.2d 82 (Fla.1995); Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGee v. State, 684 So.2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
As this court did in Alexander, we certify the same question of great public importance:
ARE ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ABOUT THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT’S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION COGNIZABLE AS AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM?
Affirmed; question certified.
CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.