Court Opinion

ID: 217688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-05-27 23:02:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:43.978187
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAY 27 2011

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-10070

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:09-cr-08128-PGR

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
ALEJANDRO ENRIQUE JIMENEZ-SAN
VINCENTE,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                    Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted May 24, 2011 **

Before:        PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

       Alejandro Enrique Jimenez-San Vincente appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction and 33-month sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jimenez-San Vicente’s counsel has

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment is

AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    10-10070