Court Opinion

ID: 994652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:26:01.205603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:57.746979
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-1071

GAIL W. GODWIN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JUMBO SPORT, formerly known as Richmond Sports,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-97-669-3)

Submitted:   March 26, 1998                 Decided:   April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gail W. Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr.,
WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CHRISTIAN & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

claims of harassment and religious discrimination. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Godwin v. Jumbo Sport, No. CA-97-669-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2