Court Opinion

ID: 5845005
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 23:43:01.939959+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:53.985178
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of the respondent’s uninsured motorists claim, petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 9, 1979, as, upon re-argument, denied petitioner’s application to permanently stay arbitration and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration. Order modified by deleting the third decretal paragraph thereof. As so modified, order afiirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner, and matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing on the issue of whether the respondent was in fact involved in a hit and run accident. Examination of the record reveals that there are several unresolved factual issues regarding whether there was actual physical contact with a hit and run vehicle. Such contact must be established by the respondent as a condition to arbitration of his claim (see Matter of Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. [Roberson], 64 AD2d 985; Matter of CountryWide Ins. Co. [Ihne], 61 AD2d 743). A hearing is necessary to determine the issues. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and O’Connor, JJ., concur.