Court Opinion

ID: 550681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:48:01.262951
License: Public Domain

917 F.2d 878
NICKLOS DRILLING COMPANY and Compass Insurance Company, Petitioners,v.Floyd COWART and Director, Office of Workers CompensationPrograms, U.S. Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 89-4944.
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 6, 1990.

H. Lee Lewis, Jr., Griggs & Harrison, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.
Lloyd N. Frischhertz, Seelig, Cosse, Frischhertz & Poulliard, New Orleans, for Cowart.
Joshua T. Gillelan, II, Samuel J. Oshinsky, Sol., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Director.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

1
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

2
(Opinion August 9, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 907 F.2d 1552)

BY THE COURT:

3
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

4
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument.  The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.