Court Opinion

ID: 9457525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:24:31.633875+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:23.305183
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Ellis M. Brydia,* in addition to his employment as a naval engineer, devoted substantial time and resources toward serving as a religious evangelist. For the tax years 1965 and 1966 appellant deducted from his income as a naval employee his expenses incurred during the course of his work as an unpaid evangelist. The Tax Court sustained the Commissioner’s challenge to these deductions and the assessment of tax deficiencies reasoning that, in view of appellant’s express disaffirmance of any profit motive in his work as an evangelist, such activities could not constitute a “trade or business” within the meaning of section 162, Internal Revenue Code of 1954. It therefore concluded that appellant was not entitled to deduct the expenses thereof from the income derived from his nonevangelical means of employment. Taxpayers appealed.
*955Although the results may seem unfortunate in some respects, we think the reasoning of the Tax Court, as set forth in T. C. Memo 1970-147, is a correct application of law to these facts. See Lamont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 339 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1964). We are not concerned with the possible use of any of these expenses as charitable contributions.
The judgment of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

 Thelma M. Brydia is a party by virtue of the joint returns filed by the appellants for the taxable years in issue.