Court Opinion

ID: 8600758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 22:05:16.864654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:10.569275
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Victor Lopez-Flores, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and *663protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), we deny the petition for review.
The agency based its adverse credibility determination on significant omissions from Lopez-Flores’s asylum application and direct testimony regarding the basis for his claims of persecution and torture in Peru. For example, Lopez-Flores testified at the conclusion of his hearing that he was kidnaped and held by guerrillas for three months, and that he had been pressured to attend several Shining Path meetings, at which he was threatened, but did not mention these incidents in his application or primary testimony. The agency also relied on Lopez-Flores’s admission that he told immigration officials that he had no fear of returning to Peru and wished to voluntarily return. The record does not compel the conclusion that Lopez-Flores is credible. See id. at 962-63.
Accordingly, Lopez-Flores is not entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the CAT. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.