Court Opinion

ID: 8462660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:32:38.712287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.675026
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Christopher Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walker, No. 3:96-cr-00123-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2008); see also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We further deny Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.