Court Opinion

ID: 6327830
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-29 19:00:22.072404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:32.794634
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 21-7481

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff - Appellee,

              v.

TIMOTHY ALAN OVERCASH,

                     Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cr-00260-RJC-DSC-1)

Submitted: March 24, 2022                                         Decided: March 29, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Alan Overcash, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Timothy Alan Overcash appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of

a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble,

992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the

record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently

explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th

Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release

motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2