Court Opinion

ID: 5801123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:28:10.969216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:35.034120
License: Public Domain

— In an action inter alia to recover for goods sold and delivered, a quantity of polyester yarn, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 9, 1974, which, inter alia, (a) granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and (b) denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered December 24, 1974, upon the said order. Order and judgment reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements; plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant’s cross motion is granted. In our opinion, there was neither physical delivery of the trailer which contained the yarn to the carrier in compliance with the purchase agreement nor delivery within the meaning of subdivision (2) of section 2-401 and section 2-509 (subd [1], par [a]) of the Uniform Commercial Code. Hence, title to and responsibility for the yarn remained with plaintiff (see Avisun Corp. v Mercer Motor Frgt., 37 AD2d 517). Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Margett and Munder, JJ., concur.