Court Opinion

ID: 8480728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:49:07.97893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.210690
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dana Amile Capehart appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Capehart, No. 2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.