Court Opinion

ID: 6065932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:33:43.596602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:01.159048
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bárbaro, J.), rendered October 19, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10). In any event, viewing the evidence in the *433light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.