Court Opinion

ID: 4173654
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-01 17:12:45.157101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:23.719785
License: Public Domain

People v Latta (2017 NY Slip Op 04370)

People v Latta

2017 NY Slip Op 04370

Decided on June 1, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.

4153 3782/07

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vDouglas Latta, Defendant-Appellant.

Feldman and Feldman, Uniondale (Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered August 8, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the fifth degree, scheme to defraud in the first degree (two counts), grand larceny in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree (four counts), attempted grand larceny in the third degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (eight counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 22 to 44 years, unanimously affirmed.
At the end of a long trial with no alternate jurors remaining, the court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to excuse a juror who had initially expressed concern that lengthy deliberations might interfere with his travel plans, but who then gave an unequivocal assurance that his ability to deliberate fairly would not be affected. There is no indication that defendant was deprived of a fair trial, and his arguments to the contrary are speculative (see e.g . People v Marchena , 303 AD2d 295 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied  100 NY2d 584 [2003]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 1, 2017
CLERK