Court Opinion

ID: 4683947
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-05 00:00:40.881836+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:11.394099
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-51081      Document: 00515847957         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/04/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                     May 4, 2021
                                  No. 19-51081                     Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                      Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Juan Francisco Renteria-Patino,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:19-CR-436-2

   Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Juan Francisco Renteria-Patino
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Renteria-Patino has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-51081    Document: 00515847957          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/04/2021

                                  No. 19-51081

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2