Court Opinion

ID: 989035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:01:09.991751+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:39.438996
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-8553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

COURTNEY LODIAN FULLER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CR-89-14)

Submitted:   March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Lodian Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in

part and denying in part Appellant's motion for the return of prop-

erty. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-

ing of the district court. United States v. Fuller, No. CR-89-14
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2