Court Opinion

ID: 995491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:38:10.087589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:23.375206
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6155

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

           versus

RANDELL   BRICE   HARRIS,   a/k/a   Randall   Brice
Harris,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-12-P)

Submitted:   June 18, 1998                       Decided:   July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randell Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Harris, No. CR-94-12-P (W.D.N.C. Jan. 14,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2