Court Opinion

ID: 8471326
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 12:29:51.120678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:19.486289
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Michelle Wing appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking her supervised release and imposing a 3-month sentence of imprisonment, plus a new 33-month term of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Wing’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No *420pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.