Court Opinion

ID: 1562309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:46:57.377124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:52.938973
License: Public Domain

16 So.3d 317 (2009)
Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D08-5153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
September 4, 2009.
*318 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph Hwan-Yul Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Jose Rodriguez pleaded guilty to trafficking in illegal drugs, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress evidence. The State concedes that the motion should have been granted and we agree. We reverse Rodriguez's conviction and remand to the circuit court with directions to discharge him. Our resolution of this issue moots the sentencing issue Rodriguez raised in this appeal.
The illegal drugs were discovered during a patdown search of Rodriguez during a traffic stop. Rodriguez agreed to a search of his car, but he did not consent to a search of his person. The deputy who conducted the traffic stop testified that he routinely conducts a patdown of a vehicle's occupants before he begins searching the car. The deputy did not state any facts that supported a reasonable belief that Rodriguez was armed or dangerous. Such routine searches based on a generalized concern for officer safety are not constitutionally permissible. See McNeil v. State, 995 So.2d 525, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), review denied, 990 So.2d 1060 (Fla.2008).
Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge Rodriguez.
FULMER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.