Court Opinion

ID: 1020528
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:52:43.968681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:26.151177
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6422

PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

G. MALDONADO, JR., Warden; JOHN ASHCROFT, The
United States Attorney General,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.    Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(3:04-cv-00100-HFF)

Submitted: September 26, 2006             Decided: September 29, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

            Patrick Lamar Harris, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district    court’s   order   accepting   the   recommendation   of   the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition.     We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Harris v. Maldonado, No. 3:04-cv-00100-HFF (D.S.C.

Jan. 11, 2006).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -