Court Opinion

ID: 2964353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:24:28.33333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:43.948207
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1383

                                  STEPHEN C. TWOMEY,

                                Petitioner, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Respondent, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                          Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Paul  Twomey  and  Twomey  &  Sisti   Law  Offices  on  brief  for
            ____________       _______________________________
        appellant.
            Donald K. Stern, United  States Attorney, and  Timothy Q.  Feeley,
            _______________                                __________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                   October 28, 1996
                                 ____________________

                                         -2-

                      Per  Curiam.   Stephen T.  Twomey appeals  from the
                      ___________

            district  court's dismissal  of his  petition pursuant  to 28

            U.S.C.    2255.    We summarily  affirm  for essentially  the
                                  _________  ______

            reasons stated by the  district court.  See United  States v.
                                                    ___ ______________

            Blais, No. 95-1093, slip op. (1st Cir. August 28, 1996).
            _____

                      Appellant's   2255 petition is denied.  See Loc. R.
                                                     ______   ___

            27.1.

                                         -3-