Court Opinion

ID: 7381412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:07:02.653308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:23.414194
License: Public Domain

Judge IIobkrtsoh
delivered the opinion of the Court.
William S. Bla'ir was a necessary party in this case. The record does not show that he was ever made a defendant.
It would-,therefore, have been right to dismiss the bill without prejudice, if the complainant had equity.
But his equity, if he showed any, was very questionable, and was of such a character as not to be entitled to the favor of the chancellor.
Moreover, the plaintiff has not complained that the bill was dismissed absolutely, instead <£>f being dismissed Without prejudice.
Denny, for plaintiff; Mills and Brown, for defendant.
He has assigned no error which can embrace this point.
Wherefore) the decree is affirmed.