Court Opinion

ID: 3067323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-15 22:35:31.329948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:55.426973
License: Public Domain

Order entered October 23, 2014

                                             In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                          Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      No. 05-14-01317-CV

                          RICKEY WAYNE TOLBERT, Appellant

                                               V.

                              GEORGE A. OTSTOTT, Appellee

                      On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1
                                 Kaufman County, Texas
                            Trial Court Cause No. 89868-CC

                                           ORDER
       Before the Court is appellant’s motion for leave to file second appeal. From a review of

the documents attached to the motion, it appears appellant first filed a notice of appeal with the

Waco Court of Appeals on August 14, 2014. That appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction

September 11, 2014. See No. 10-14-00240-CV, 2014 WL 4635706 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 11,

2014, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). Appellant then filed his notice of appeal in this Court, along with

his motion for leave, on September 29, 2014. However, neither the opinion dismissing the

appeal in the Waco Court of Appeals nor the notice of appeal filed in this Court state the date of

the appealed judgment or whether a motion for new trial or motion to modify judgment was

timely filed. These dates are necessary to determine whether the notice of appeal filed in this

Court is timely, we have jurisdiction over the appeal, and appellant’s motion for leave should be
granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1. Accordingly, we requested a copy of the trial court’s

docket sheet. The docket sheet we received from the trial court clerk reflects the judgment was

signed July 11, 2014 and no motion for new trial or motion to modify judgment was filed. Given

that date and the lack of a post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal needed to be filed in this

Court no later than August 10, 2014 to be timely under rule of appellate procedure 26.1 and

confer jurisdiction. See id. 25.1(b), 26.1; Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 233

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

       Because the notice of appeal filed in this Court was filed after August 10th, it appears

untimely and it appears we lack jurisdiction over the appeal and should deny the motion.

Pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 42.3, we ORDER appellant to file a letter brief

addressing the timeliness of the notice of appeal no later than November 3, 2014. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3. Appellee may file a response within ten days of appellant’s letter brief. If any

party relies on documents not before the Court, that party must obtain a clerk’s record containing

that documentation.

       Once the Court has received the letter brief(s), the Court will either (1) grant the motion

for leave and notify the parties of any pending deadlines or (2) deny the motion and dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant is cautioned that failure to file the letter brief may

result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

                                                      /s/   ADA BROWN
                                                            JUSTICE