Court Opinion

ID: 1005924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:03:30.997986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:42.772480
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EDDIE C. RASBERRY, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-00-76, CA-00-76-2)

Submitted:   November 8, 2001          Decided:     November 19, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie C. Rasberry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Eddie C. Rasberry, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Rasberry, Nos. CR-00-76;

CA-00-76-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2001; entered Aug. 1, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2