Court Opinion

ID: 9472637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 04:06:09.789765+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:43:03.040342
License: Public Domain

JENKINS, District Judge,
concurring:
T . ,, . . , „ ,, I concur m the mdgment of the court, The principle m this case is the same as that get forth in United States v. Neal, 743 F.2d 1441 (10th Cir.1984) entered this day. Ag suggested in my concurring opinion in ^ before one may apply an exception to & rule against the disclosure of a confiden- ^ marital communication one must first decide that the disclosure is in fact such a ... T communication. In my opinion the testimo- . , n ny received m this case is not such a disclon ,7 ,. „ ~ 7 sure and thus the question of Crime/Fraud ,. , . , , . exception need not be reached.
. fl ... ,As to ^he remaining issues, I concur m ^ e cour^ s °Pmion-