Court Opinion

ID: 9666403
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 01:13:52.530546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:28.283571
License: Public Domain

SEARS, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the results but dissent from the majority opinion which affirms the trial court’s refusal to grant the motion to suppress. There is no evidence to show that appellant exercised any care, custody or control over the contraband. Further, except for the uncorroborated testimony of the co-conspirator, there is no evidence showing appellant had any knowledge of the existence of the contraband.
I would also sustain point of error number four. Without the uncorroborated testimony of the co-conspirator, there is no evidence of “intent to deliver.”