Court Opinion

ID: 4908339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-04 00:00:35.796663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:25.520766
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40862     Document: 00516003270         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/03/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                  September 3, 2021
                                  No. 20-40862
                                Summary Calendar                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Quan Tu,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:19-CR-243-1

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Quan Tu has moved for leave to
   withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tu
   has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40862    Document: 00516003270          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/03/2021

                                  No. 20-40862

   portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2