Court Opinion

ID: 6019487
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 11:40:27.112381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:42.890758
License: Public Domain

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the jury’s award for past and future pain and suffering is excessive. The award does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Harvey v Mazal Am. Partners, 79 NY2d 218, 225). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.—Damages.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.