Court Opinion

ID: 1008402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:39:40.223597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:37.521761
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Patrick Edwin Rudd appeals the district court’s judgment granting in part the Government’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Rudd’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauper-is and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Rudd,
  
  CA-01-730 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.