Court Opinion

ID: 4155760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-27 16:01:17.697657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:38.599908
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        Tenth Circuit

                                 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                         March 27, 2017
                             _________________________________
                                                                            Elisabeth A. Shumaker
                                                                                Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

       Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.                                                            No. 15-1459
                                                  (D.C. Nos. 1:15-CV-02489-REB and
SHAWN LA VELLE ROLLINS,                                 1:06-CR-00240-REB-1)
                                                               (D. Colo.)
       Defendant - Appellant.

--------------------------------------

THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
FOR THE DISTRICTS OF COLORADO
AND WYOMING,

       Amicus Curiae.
                             _________________________________

                                 ORDER AND JUDGMENT
                             _________________________________

Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
                  _________________________________

        This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion

for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the

district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in

Beckles v. United States, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant

Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.

        
         This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
       Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district

court is affirmed.

       The mandate shall issue forthwith.

                                             Entered for the Court
                                             Per Curiam

                                            2