Court Opinion

ID: 9772798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 17:30:19.787536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:48.545717
License: Public Domain

BURGESS, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
I concur in the denial of the writ of mandamus.
I dissent to that portion of the majority opinion relating to the production of maintenance documents. If the matter was impliedly ruled upon in the trial court’s order, then relator has not shown any abuse of discretion. If the matter was left unresolved, it seems highly inappropriate, in my opinion, for this intermediate appellate court to “suggest” to the trial court how the discovery should be accomplished and how the costs should be taxed. This is solely the function of a trial court and should be left to the trial judge without any “suggestions” from this court.
For the reasons herein expressed, I concur in part and dissent in part.