Court Opinion

ID: 6497136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-01 05:11:59.901376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:44.744299
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-21-00390-CR
                               __________________

                    JEREMY C. MACDONALD, Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 435th District Court
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 21-03-03529-CR
__________________________________________________________________

                                      ORDER

      The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed January

28, 2022, and the reporter’s record was filed January 26, 2022. The appellant, Jeremy

C. MacDonald, represented himself at trial with the assistance of Jarrod Walker, as

appointed stand-by counsel. On May 4, 2022, the Court granted a third extension of

time to file the appellant’s brief, noting that the extension was a “final extension.”

On May 31, 2022, the appellant requested an additional extension. On June 1, 2022,

we notified the appellant that the motion for a fourth extension had been denied and

                                          1
that the brief must be filed by June 7, 2022. Notwithstanding this Court’s previous

notices that the brief was late, and the notice that the Court would not grant

additional extensions, the appellant’s court appointed stand-by counsel requested

additional time to prepare a brief because of health reasons.

      We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing

at which a representative of the State, stand-by counsel Jarrod Walker, and the

appellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). If the appellant

is not incarcerated but fails to appear at the hearing after having been notified to do

so, or after reasonable attempts to notify him have been made, then the trial court

may enter a finding that the appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and send

said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If the appellant appears

at the hearing, we direct the trial court to determine whether the appellant desires to

pursue his appeal, and if he does, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief

of the appellant has not been filed, whether the appellant is represented by appointed,

retained, volunteer, or stand-by counsel, and determine why the appellant has not

adequately responded to late notices from this Court, and whether good cause exists

for stand-by counsel Jarrod Walker to be relieved of his duties and replaced by

substitute stand-by counsel. If the appellant desires to continue with his appeal and

represent himself on appeal, we direct the trial court to admonish appellant as to the

dangers of self-representation on appeal and determine whether appellant’s apparent

                                          2
decision to relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is

knowingly and intelligently made.

      The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court

judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The supplemental reporter’s

record of the hearing and the supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders and

recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or before July 27, 2022.

      ORDER ENTERED June 27, 2022.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

                                         3