Court Opinion

ID: 4441787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-26 14:16:15.449759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:17.269382
License: Public Domain

In The

                               Court of Appeals

                      Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                              __________________

                              NO. 09-19-00320-CV
                              __________________

                     IN RE KAREN BEVERLY
__________________________________________________________________

                         Original Proceeding
        County Court at Law No. 3 of Montgomery County, Texas
                     Trial Cause No. 09-12-12166
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator Karen Beverly filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which she

asks this Court to compel the trial court to vacate its order granting her former

husband’s motion for reconsideration of his first amended motion or forensic

custody evaluation.

      Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or violation

of a duty imposed by law when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer,

827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). After reviewing the mandamus record and

                                        1
petition, we conclude that the relator has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion by

the trial court for which there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, we

deny the petition for writ of mandamus, and we deny the relator’s motion for

temporary emergency relief.

      PETITION DENIED; MOTION FOR TEMPORARY EMERGENCY

RELIEF DENIED.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 25, 2019
Opinion Delivered September 26, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                         2