Court Opinion

ID: 9369527
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-09 01:00:21.286133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:15.724334
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40563        Document: 00516639324             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/08/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                     ____________                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                     FILED
                                      No. 22-40563                             February 8, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                    ____________                                     Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Martin Hernandez-Estrada,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:22-CR-451-1
                     ______________________________

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin
   Hernandez-Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Estrada has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40563    Document: 00516639324         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/08/2023

                                 No. 22-40563

   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2