Court Opinion

ID: 3074247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:00:24.452688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:44.922048
License: Public Domain

In The

                               Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                               _________________

                              NO. 09-13-00483-CR
                              _________________

                       IN RE DAVID LEE VICTORICK

__________________________________________________________________

                         Original Proceeding
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator David Lee Victorick filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this

Court. In three issues, Victorick complains that the presiding judge of the Second

Administrative Judicial Region denied his motion to recuse the trial judge.

      On the record before us, we conclude that we lack mandamus authority over

the presiding judge’s denial of the motion to recuse the trial judge. See Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); In re ES Energy Solutions, LP, No. 05-10-

01158-CV, 2010 WL 3720219, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 24, 2010, orig.

proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Davidson, No. 09-07-380 CV, 2007 WL 2324321, at

*1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 16, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, we dismiss Victorick’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                                         1
      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                                 PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered November 6, 2013
Do not publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                       2