Court Opinion

ID: 9718166
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:18:07.174361+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:57.712544
License: Public Domain

Rawlings, J.
Being unable to agree with the statements made and conclusions reached in Division II of the majority-opinion, I respectfully dissent. See Fahy v. Connecticut, 375 U. S. 85, 91, 84 S. Ct. 229, 232, 11 L. Ed.2d 171; Fay v. Noia, 372 U. S. 391, 439, 83 S. Ct. 822, 849, 9 L. Ed.2d 837; and dissent in State v. Rye, 260 Iowa 146, 157, 148 N.W.2d 632, 639, replacing former opinion reported in 145 N.W.2d 608.
Because of failure to advise defendant of his right to counsel his statements to the officers could not be used for any purpose in the trial of the case, including rebuttal.
Mason and Becker, JJ., join in this dissent.