Court Opinion

ID: 2277611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:57:44.320555+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:37.635575
License: Public Domain

329 S.W.3d 755 (2011)
Michelle SHOULTS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94595.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
January 18, 2011.
Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michelle Shoults appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035[1] motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.