Court Opinion

ID: 9552289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:08:09.086736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:26:05.343746
License: Public Domain

PETERS, J.
For the reasons set forth in my concurring and dissenting opinion in In re Tahl, 1 Cal.3d 122, 138 et seq. [81 Cal.Rptr. 577, 460 P.2d 449] and my dissenting opinion in In re Mosley, 1 Cal.3d 913, 927 et seq. [83 Cal.Rptr. 809, 464 P.2d 473], I dissent in the present case. In my opinion, In re Mosley, supra, should at least be given limited retroactive effect to at least the date of the decision in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 [23 L.Ed.2d 274, 89 S.Ct. 1709].
Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied March 31, 1971. Peters, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.