Court Opinion

ID: 9365004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-20 21:00:35.544028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.158078
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1916      Doc: 5        Filed: 01/19/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-1916

        ROSE B. MOUMOUNI,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        WENDELL SUMTER; DANIEL PFIEFFER; DANA COLTER-WILLIAMS; DR.
        JEANIE LIGON; DR. ANTWON SUTTON; DEMORRIOUS ROBINSON,

                            Defendants - Appellees,

                     and

        CHESTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

                            Defendant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
        Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:22-cv-01697-MGL-SVH)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 19, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Rose B. Moumouni, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1916      Doc: 5        Filed: 01/19/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Rose B. Moumouni seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate

        judge’s recommendation and dismissing some, but not all, Defendants from her civil case.

        This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain

        interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

        Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Moumouni seeks

        to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

        Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     DISMISSED

                                                    2