Court Opinion

ID: 7352474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 02:50:07.487873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:27.744349
License: Public Domain

GERARD, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged breach of contract for failure to deliver certain pony coats. Plaintiff claims, that he agreed to purchase from defendant 33 pony coats at $27.50 apiece, to be delivered September 15, 1912. Plaintiff claims that defendant failed to deliver the coats as agreed, and that on September 15, 1912, the value of pony coats was $35.
The judgment must be reversed, because of the charge of the learned court, who said:
“The measure of his [plaintiff’s] damages would be, as counsel stated, the difference in the price at the time of the contract and at the time when he was able to buy the goods. He has testified that the market value of the coats, after the date when he should have h&d them from the defendant, was $35, instead of $27.50, and that would be the measure of his damages. Now, that is all there is in the case. You have heard the witnesses, and seen them, and it is for you to pass upon the facts. Now, if you find for the plaintiff, the damages should be the difference between the sum of $27.50 and the price at which he could have bought them at that time.”
There was a conflict of evidence as to what the market value was, and it was therefore an error to charge the jury, as the court did, that the market value was $35, and that that would be the measure of plaintiff’s damages. Defendant’s counsel excepted to this charge.
Judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.