Court Opinion

ID: 2754985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-25 16:06:28.566299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:59.003777
License: Public Domain

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
                 REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
                 consistent with this order.

                                                                                         J.
                                                           Hardesty

                                                                                         J.

                 CHERRY, J., concurring:
                             For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
                 U.S. Bank, N.A.,   130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
                 that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
                 association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
                 Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
                 disposition of this appeal.

                                                                                         J.

                 cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
                      Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC
                      Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
                      Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                     2
(0) 194,A    e