Court Opinion

ID: 9637769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 15:19:24.432429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:08.865966
License: Public Domain

BOOTH, Circuit Judge
(concurring in part). I concur in the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed as to the first and third counts. I dissent from the conclusion as to the second count.
The question whether that count was demurrable is not before the court for disposition, inasmuch as no demurrer was interposed. The motion for a bill of particulars was, in my judgment, addressed to the discretion of the court, and its decision is not subject to review. Consequently I think the judgment on the second count should be affirmed.
My views as to the proper function of a bill of particulars are set forth in a dissenting opinion in Myers v. United States (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 977, filed October 15, 1926.