Court Opinion

ID: 656448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:48.447694
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Kirk Scott ROBERTS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE OF MARYLAND;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6513.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 27, 1993.Decided:  October 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-93-403-JFM)
Kirk Scott Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Roberts v. State of Maryland, No. CA-93-403-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 28, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED