Court Opinion

ID: 656488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:53:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:48.775643
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.George HARRIS, a/k/a G, a/k/a Mr. G, a/k/a George,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6556.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  January 15, 1993.Decided:  October 19, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CR-88-76-N, CA-92-16-N)
George Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
George Harris appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Harris, Nos.  CR-88-76-N;  CA-92-16-N (E.D. Va.  May 8, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED