Court Opinion

ID: 993017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:01:32.843937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.299886
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6231

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GARY LYNN WALLACE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-278, CA-96-395-1)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997       Decided:   September 19, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Franklin Loflin, III, LOFLIN & LOFLIN, Durham, North Caro-
lina, for Appellant. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States
Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Wallace, Nos. CR-92-278; CA-96-395-1 (M.D.N.C.
Dec. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2