Court Opinion

ID: 3221973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 15:58:30.324862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:55.145949
License: Public Domain

There was found in the possession of defendant, at his filling station, a lot of beer. This beer was in pint bottles and labeled by the manufacturer, but there is nowhere in the testimony or on the labels on the bottles any evidence tending to show that the beer contained alcohol in any amount. This court cannot assume that it' did. Anderson v. State,20 Ala. App. 154, 101 So. 162; Sharp v. State, 22 Ala. App. 562,118 So. 238.
Section 4615 of the Code is still the law except as it is modified by Act of the Legislature 1932, Ex. Sess., p. 56, which permits the possession of cereal beverages containing not more than one-half of 1 per cent. alcohol. One of the elements of the offense charged is that the beer should contain an alcohol content of more than one-half of 1 per cent. The burden of proving this is on the State, and this burden, under the evidence in this record, it failed to carry. Allbright v. State, ante, p. 2, 165 So. 259, certiorari denied, 231 Ala. 372,165 So. 260.
The defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge.
It is but fair to say that in this conclusion the Attorney General concurs.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.