Court Opinion

ID: 9770838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 16:22:53.086332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:21.198806
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
WOODLEY, Judge.
Objections addressed to the court’s charge which were not in the record when the original opinion herein was delivered are now before us.
The instrument filed does not, however, show that such objections were called to the court’s attention or that the court ruled upon the objections to the charge.
In the absence of a showing in the record over the signature of the judge that the objections were timely presented and overruled and that appellant excepted to such ruling, we are unable to agree that appellant “excepted” to the charge given in addition to requesting special charges.
Being a misdemeanor case, it was incumbent upon appellant to reserve timely exceptions to the charge given as well as to *616request the giving of a properly prepared charge on the subject. See Crispi v. State, 90 Tex. Cr. R. 621, 237 S.W. 263; 4 Tex. Jur. 75, Sec. 47.
The case having been properly disposed of on original submission, appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
Opinion approved by the court.