Court Opinion

ID: 6215766
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-07 20:07:43.969653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:57:05.728504
License: Public Domain

Cite as 2022 Ark. 13
                   SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                                Opinion Delivered:   January 27, 2022
 IN RE VIRTUAL AND BLENDED COURT
 PROCEEDINGS, REVISED RULE 43, AND
 PROPOSED RULE 88 OF THE ARKANSAS
 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

                                        PER CURIAM

       In response to developments in modern video- and audio-transmission technology,

members of the bench and bar requested that the court consider the circumstances under

which testimony could be taken by contemporaneous transmission from a location outside

the physical courtroom. The proposed amendment to Rule 43 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil

Procedure as well as proposed Rule 88 concern such “virtual” and “blended” court

proceedings. The amendment and new rule are set out below in “line-in, line-out fashion” —

new material is underlined, and deleted material is lined through.

       We solicit your comments. Comments should be made in writing on or before March

31, 2022, and addressed to Stacey Pectol, Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court

of Appeals, 625 Marshall Street, Suite 130, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201.

Rule 43. Taking of testimony.

(a) Form. In all trials, the testimony of witnesses shall be taken in open court, unless
otherwise provided by these rules, including Rule 88 relating to Virtual and Blended
Court Proceedings, or as otherwise provided by law. The court may, for good cause
shown in compelling circumstances and upon appropriate safeguards, permit
presentation of testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a
different location.
(b) Affirmation in Lieu of Oath. Whenever under these rules an oath is required to be
taken, a solemn affirmation may be accepted in lieu thereof.

(c) Evidence on Motions. When a motion is based on facts not appearing of record, the
court may hear the matter on affidavits presented by the respective parties, or the
court may direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly on oral testimony or
deposition.

(d) Interpreters. The court may appoint an interpreter of its own selection and may fix
his reasonable compensation. The compensation shall be paid out of funds provided
by law or by one or more of the parties as the court may direct, and may be taxed
ultimately as costs, in the discretion of the court.

 Proposed Rule 88. Virtual and Blended Court Proceedings.

 (a) The court has discretion to conduct hearings or trials as “virtual” or “blended”
 proceedings as set forth in this Rule.
        (1) “Virtual proceedings” are proceedings in which all parties, counsel, the
 court reporter, witnesses, and the judge are simultaneously participating in the
 proceeding via electronic means.
        (2) “Blended proceedings” are proceedings in which at least two of the above
 individuals are participating in the proceeding from the physical courtroom and at
 least one of the above is participating simultaneously via electronic means.
 (b) Hearings or nonjury trials may be conducted as “virtual” or “blended”
 proceedings upon a determination by the court of the following:
        (1) Procedures are in place to protect the constitutional, statutory, and
 procedural rights of parties;
        (2) Means exist for taking and preserving a concurrent record;
        (3) Clear and practical procedures are in place for the consideration of
 evidence;
       (4) The technical ability exists for all necessary individuals to participate
 meaningfully; and
        (5) The public has access to any proceedings that would otherwise be open.
               (i) Public access may be satisfied by the virtual proceedings being

                                              2
simulcast in the physical courtroom upon request of any member of the public
present in the courtroom.
              (ii) No advance notice to the public that a hearing or trial will proceed
under this Rule is required.
              (iii) No additional measures are necessary for blended proceedings so
long as the audio/visual display in the courtroom is sufficient for members of the
gallery to witness the proceedings reasonably.
(c) Jury trials may be blended only as to specific witnesses or the court reporter at
the discretion of the judge, given the safeguards described under section (b) above
are met, but parties, counsel, the judge, and the jury must all be present in the
physical courtroom.
(d) Requests for “virtual” or “blended” proceedings may be raised as follows:
       (1) The parties by joint motion may manifest their agreement to “virtual” or
“blended” proceedings as set forth in this Rule.
       (2) Any party may move the court to conduct “virtual” or “blended”
proceedings as set forth in this Rule.
       (i) The motion must set forth how the safeguards in section (b) of this Rule
are to be met.
        (ii) The motion may not be granted absent an opportunity for all parties to
respond under these Rules and be heard.
       (3) The court on its own may notify the parties of its intent to conduct a
hearing or trial as “virtual” or “blended” proceedings.
       (i) The notice must set forth how the safeguards in section (b) of this Rule are
to be met.
       (ii) The court may not proceed with “virtual” or “blended” proceedings
absent an opportunity for all parties to be heard.
       (e) Virtual or blended proceedings may not be broadcast, recorded,
photographed, or otherwise published by anyone except under the conditions
described in Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 6.

                                             3