Court Opinion

ID: 6147701
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:29:25.932252+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:55.644437
License: Public Domain

Bischoff, J.
The judgment appealed from is plainly unauthorized by the evidence, and should be reversed.
Plaintiff’s recovery was upon one of the policies only, and this provided as follows: “ No obligation is assumed by the company prior to the date hereof, nor, unless upon said date, the assured is alive and in sound health.”
On the trial it appeared conclusively that for upwards of three years before the date of the policy the assured was afflicted with chronic asthma to such an extent that he was unable to pursue his usual calling, and that this ailment, accompanied by subsequent and resultant complications, led to his death.
No argument is required to demonstrate that it was the intention of the parties to the contract of insurance that the inception of defendant’s risk should be dependent upon the existence of certain conditions, to wit, that at the date of the policy the assured be alive and in sound health; and, these failing, defendant’s liability under the policy never attached.
The judgment appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Pryor, J., concurs.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.