Court Opinion

ID: 6316130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-22 01:00:25.756611+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:42.336808
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10372     Document: 00516209935         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/21/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                     February 21, 2022
                                  No. 21-10372
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Yvette Jasmine Gonzalez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:20-CR-339-6

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Yvette Jasmine Gonzalez has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10372     Document: 00516209935         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2022

                                  No. 21-10372

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Gonzalez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2. Gonzalez’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is
   DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

                                       2