Court Opinion

ID: 9381141
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-21 21:01:20.124152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:30.310748
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2178      Doc: 42         Filed: 03/20/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 21-2178

        BARBARA ANN KELLY,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        OFFIT KURMAN, P.A.,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-03668-CCB)

        Submitted: March 16, 2023                                         Decided: March 20, 2023

        Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Barbara Ann Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Russell Hodges, ECCLESTON & WOLF,
        PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2178      Doc: 42         Filed: 03/20/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Barbara Ann Kelly appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying her motion to

        disqualify Defendant’s counsel and granting Defendant’s motions to strike the suggestion

        of bankruptcy, strike the amended complaint, and dismiss her complaint; and (2) denying

        her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Offit Kurman,

        P.A., No. 1:17-cv-03668-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 23, 2021; Sept. 21, 2021). We dispense with

        oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2