Court Opinion

ID: 8452501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:06:04.375778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.909483
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Goode appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Goode, No. 3:09-cr-00013-REP-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.