Court Opinion

ID: 9615127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:31:31.61529+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:41.922082
License: Public Domain

LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in the Court's determination in this case. The United States Supreme Court held in U.S. v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340, 349, 98 S.Ct. 1834, 1841, 56 L.Ed.2d 329, 347 (1978), that a writ of habeas corpus and prosequendum is not a detainer within the meaning of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, and thus, does not trigger the application of its provisions.