Court Opinion

ID: 8211518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-04 12:10:23.197828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:03.417671
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                   San Antonio, Texas
                                       September 29, 2022

                                      No. 04-22-00605-CR

                                    Kristine Dawn MARTIN,
                                            Appellant

                                                v.

                                      The STATE of Texas,
                                            Appellee

                From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
                                Trial Court No. 18-0059-CR-B
                          Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER
        Appellant Kristine Dawn Martin entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to
which she pleaded guilty to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence on July 7,
2021 in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s
record includes the written plea bargain agreement. See id. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an
appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part
of the record.” Id. The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed
the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id.
25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does
not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding
court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is
accurate).

        The record further shows Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, a notice
of appeal was due August 6, 2021, or the notice and a motion for extension of time to file, were
due fifteen days later on August 21, 2021. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. The record contains a
notice of appeal file stamped September 12, 2022. See id. 26.3.

        Having reviewed the record, it appears appellant does not have the right to appeal and the
notice of appeal was untimely filed. We therefore order appellant to file a response, by October
19, 2022, establishing: (1) the notice of appeal was timely filed and (2) an amended certification
showing she has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

        If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show the appeal is timely and appellant has
the right to appeal, appellant must request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and
file a copy of the request with this court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order
within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed.

        We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further
order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court
reporter.

                                                      _________________________________
                                                      Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 29th day of September, 2022.

                                                      ___________________________________
                                                      MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court