Court Opinion

ID: 7758502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:32:20.069558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:33.505231
License: Public Domain

"An intervenor must have a direct, substantial, and legally protectable interest in the proceeding." State Highway Dep't v. Parsons, 623 So.2d 285,290 (Ala. 1993). I am convinced that Sheila Tack, Loyce Fisher, and Katherine Nagel had no such interest in this proceeding. Therefore, I must conclude that the trial court erred in granting their Ala.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2) motion for permissive intervention. I respectfully dissent.
Moore, C.J., concurs.