Court Opinion

ID: 4703069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-13 13:00:39.374394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:48.694036
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-14496    Date Filed: 07/13/2021   Page: 1 of 2

                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 20-14496
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cr-00006-CEH-JSS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

VICTOR HUGO BRAVO ARMENDARIZ,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (July 13, 2021)

Before MARTIN, BRANCH and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 20-14496      Date Filed: 07/13/2021   Page: 2 of 2

      Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Victor Armendariz in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Armendariz’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2