Court Opinion

ID: 1006473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:11:59.40317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:51.564393
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RUDOLPH ALI CHAMBLEE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-140, CA-01-466)

Submitted:   January 17, 2002             Decided:   January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rudolph Ali Chamblee, Appellant Pro Se.     Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rudolph Ali Chamblee seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Chamblee, Nos. CR-96-140;

CA-01-466 (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2001; entered July 12, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2