Court Opinion

ID: 9728115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 13:59:02.499441+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:45.972286
License: Public Domain

Adams, J.
(concurring in affirmance). I concur with Justice Souris in affirmance of the trial judge for the reasons stated in sections 1 and 2 of his opinion. I do not believe it essential to decision in this case to determine that the doctrine of assumption of risk should be done away with in this State. The trial judge concluded that a charge as to assumption of risk should not be given to the jury since assumption of risk is not in the case. I agree with that analysis of the proofs. I would defer considera*60tion of the elimination of this doctrine until such time as that question is specifically before the Court.
Smith, J., concurred with Adams, J.