Court Opinion

ID: 4390647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-25 12:02:19.684923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:51:51.580144
License: Public Domain

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic
and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of
any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go
to press.

                          District of Columbia
                           Court of Appeals

No. 19-BG-147

IN RE IFEOLU A. FABAYO
                                                            2019 DDN 22
A Member of the Bar of the
District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 982634

BEFORE: Beckwith and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.

                                   ORDER
                             (FILED – April 25, 2019)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland
disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this
court’s March 5, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this
matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be
imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent
failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or her D.C. Bar R.
XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is

       ORDERED that Ifeolu A. Fabayo is hereby disbarred from the practice of law
in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller,
930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal
discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
      FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of
respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files a D.C. Bar
R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

                                  PER CURIAM