Court Opinion

ID: 2962917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:03:39.831594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:03.261498
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 3, 1994                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1314                                CESAR B. RESURRECCION,                                     Petitioner,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                     Respondent.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Boudin, Cyr and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Cesar B. Resurreccion on brief pro se.
            _____________________            Donald K. Stern,  United States  Attorney, and Timothy Q.  Feeley,
            _______________                                __________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief respondent.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.   Petitioner Cesar  B. Resurreccion  appeals
                 __________            the dismissal  by the United  States District  Court for  the            District  of  Massachusetts of  his  motion,  pursuant to  28            U.S.C.    2255, to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence.            We have  reviewed the  record in this  case, as  well as  the            parties' briefs.   Petitioner has failed  to demonstrate that            the  failure by  his counsel  to raise  any issue  below "was            sufficiently  prejudicial  to  undermine  confidence  in  the            outcome of the trial."   Singleton v. United States,  26 F.3d
                                     _________    _____________            233, 238 (1st Cir. 1994).  Therefore, his petition for relief            was properly denied.                   Affirmed.
                 ________