Court Opinion

ID: 9850499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:58:20.734469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:38.222911
License: Public Domain

Michael J. Kelly, J.
(dissenting). I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the policy’s owned/nonowned vehicle exclusion was not ambiguous or contrary to the reasonable expectations of the insureds. In Powers v DAIIE, 427 Mich 602, 617-618; 398 NW2d 411 (1986), our Supreme Court found virtually identical provisions invalid as ambiguous and contrary to the reasonable expectations of the policyholder. Although Powers was a plurality opinion, I believe it is still strong persuasive authority which should be followed by this Court. I would reverse.