Court Opinion

ID: 3118137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:57:50.205467+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:52:57.438753
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-10-0001-CV
 
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
 
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
AT AMARILLO
 
PANEL C
 
 JANUARY 7, 2010
 
______________________________
 
 
IN RE: ROBERT PAT WHITEAKER AND WHITEAKER RANCHES, INC.

_________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF

          Relators, Robert Pat Whiteaker and Whiteaker Ranches, Inc., have filed a petition
for writ of mandamus alleging an abuse of discretion by the trial court in the signing of an
order approving the sale of receivership property and authorizing and directing the
Receiver, Wayne Cogdill, to complete the sale pursuant to the terms of a certain Farm and
Ranch Purchase Contract between Whiteaker Family Ranches Limited Partnership as
seller and Doug Lathem as buyer (hereinafter referred to as the Lathem Contract). 
Additionally, Relators have filed an emergency motion for temporary relief requesting this
Court to stay the effectiveness of that order pending disposition of their original petition. 

          An appellate court, pursuant to Rule 52.10(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure, may without notice grant any “just relief” pending the disposition of the original
petition.  Just relief may include staying the enforcement of an order for purposes of
protecting the jurisdiction of the appellate court by maintaining the status quo of the
underlying proceeding while the court considers the merits of the mandamus action.  In re
Kelleher, 999 S.W.2d 51, 52 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1999, orig. proceeding); In re Reed, 901
S.W.2d 604, 609 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1995, orig. proceeding).
           Having reviewed the emergency motion for temporary relief and the petition for writ
of mandamus, this Court is of the opinion that the underlying issue here is whether the
Lathem Contract is a valid and enforceable obligation of the Whiteaker Family Ranches
Limited Partnership and whether the Receiver should be ordered to complete the sale
pursuant to the terms of that contract.  Because the order in question directly bears upon
those issues, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, we grant Relators’ request for
temporary relief and stay the enforcement of the trial court’s order of January 4, 2010.
          CONCLUSION
          Relators’ motion for emergency relief is granted.  The trial court’s order of January
4, 2010, is stayed pending disposition of Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus.  The
Court further orders that the original plaintiffs, Martha Lane Clark, Debra Carol Horn, Travis
Wayne Horn, Travis Lee Parker, Otis Brandon Parker, and Monica Carol Parker; the
Receiver, Wayne Cogdill; the Intervenor, Doug Lathem; and the Intervenors, Kevin
Spielman and Kay Spielman, d/b/a Kevin Spielman Farms and d/b/a Spielman Cattle
Company, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by January 18, 2010.
 
                                                                           Per Curiam