Court Opinion

ID: 4089290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-13 15:01:34.902572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:08.460863
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

         DATATREASURY CORPORATION,
                  Appellant

                           v.

                    FISERV, INC.,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                 2016-1229, 2016-1230
                ______________________

   Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
CBM2014-00087, CBM2014-00088.
               ______________________

               Decided: October 13, 2016
                ______________________

   EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX,
argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD
GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX;
CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX.

    DAVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis,
MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH
C. CARVER, EMMA CATHRENE HARTY, NICK E. WILLIAMSON;
ROBERT GERARD LANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA.
                ______________________
2                DATATREASURY CORPORATION   v. FISERV, INC.

    Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in
DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No.
16-1046.