Court Opinion

ID: 8674862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:32:32.2177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:23.970149
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Gastelum Rascón has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). *332Gastelum Rascón has filed a response and requested the appointment of new counsel. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Gaste-lum Rascon’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Gastelum Rascon’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Gastelum Rascon’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.