Court Opinion

ID: 5614619
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:13:07.248869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:12.587569
License: Public Domain

Broyles, O. J.
The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and the court therefore erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the special grounds of the motion.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Thomas & Walker, Benton Odom, for plaintiff in error,
cited: 16 Ga. App. 216; 22 Ga. App. 274; 26 Ga. App. 421; Id. 426 (3).
James R. Thomas, solicitor, W. B. Gills, contra.