Court Opinion

ID: 9131511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-28 00:37:53.695387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:12:25.952421
License: Public Domain

Justice Blackmun,
dissenting.
Even if I had not reached the conclusion that the death penalty cannot be imposed fairly within the constraints of our Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, 510 U. S. 1141, 1143 (1994), I could not support its imposition in this case. There is substantial evidence that William Henry Hance is mentally retarded as well as mentally ill. There is reason to believe that his trial and sentencing proceedings were infected with racial prejudice. One of his sentencers has come forward to say that she did not vote for the death penalty because of his mental impáirments. And Mr. Hance has raised a colorable claim that the trial court’s refusal to answer his jurors’ questions about sentencing options should be held and considered in light of the forthcoming decision in Simmons v. South Carolina, No. 92-9059, pending before this Court. Accordingly, I would grant the application for a stay, grant the petition for writ of certiorari, and vacate the death sentence in this case.