Court Opinion

ID: 9929112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-01 19:00:46.966306+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:15:31.769614
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10747         Document: 00517052286             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/01/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10747
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                               February 1, 2024
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Montray Lorenzo Cato,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:12-CR-194-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Montray Cato
   has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
   738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cato has
   not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10747    Document: 00517052286          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/01/2024

                                  No. 23-10747

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2