Court Opinion

ID: 3645932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:02:07.940311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:07.858594
License: Public Domain

At November term, 1877, the defendant was indicted for the violation of the act of 1873-'74, ch. 31, in that he sold one bale of cotton upon which he had given a chattel mortgage to secure certain rent due the prosecutor. The principle on which this case was decided is the same as in State v.Pickens, 79 N.C. 652. There was no motion in the court below to arrest the judgment from which defendant appealed.
There were some exceptions taken by the defendant on the trial below, but it is only necessary to notice that taken to the form of the indictment.
The bill of indictment does not charge that the lien was in force when the bale of cotton was disposed of, nor to whom it was sold. For these reasons the bill is fatally defective, and the judgment below must be arrested. State v. Pickens, 79 N.C. 652.
There is error. Let this be certified to the superior court of Wake county that the defendant may be discharged.
PER CURIAM.                              Error. *Page 377