Court Opinion

ID: 7186464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:52:49.730549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:05.056543
License: Public Domain

Land, J.
The plaintiff sues for the balance of account, for timber furnished by him to the defendants, under a special contract.
The answer contains a demand in rcconveution, consisting of various items, which exceed the balance of account.
There was judgment in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed ; and as the former have not prayed for an amendment of the judgment, only one question is submitted for our decision, and that is, whether the item of $288 46, *188for loss on timber furnished from the Bayou St. John, and which constituted a part of the defendants’ claim in reconvention, was properly allowed. The plaintiff stipulated to deliver the timber, (which -was intended for the construction or repair of wharfs, in the first district of this city,) at the depot of the New Orleans and Jackson Railroad; and further stipulated, in case of accident to the railroad, to deliver it in the Bayou St. John, at a price equal to that at the depot.
The evidence shows that timber cost more when delivered in the bayou, than at the railroad depot, and it is for this alleged difference, under the contract, that the defendants claimed the aforesaid sum of $288 46 in their rcconvcntional demand.
The delivery of the timber under the contract, was to commence on the 1 »1h of June, 1857, but the defendants have failed to prove that they purchased timber at the bayou after that date ; and as far as the evidence discloses the date of the. purchase, it was prior thereto, to wit, the loth of June, 3 857. The plaintiff is certainly not liable for the difference in the price of timber delivered at the railroad depot, and at the Bayou St. John, before he was under a legal obligation, by virtue of his contract, to maleo a delivery at cither place.
The District Judge erred in allowing' this item ; and its allowance left a. balance in favor of the defendants, under the judgment of the lower court, of $7 f)6, when there should have boon a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $280 50.
It is, Iherefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be reversed : and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, in solido, the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars 'and fifty cents, (the balance due him, after allowing the defendants the sum of thirty-four dollars and fifty-five cents on their rcconvcntional demand,) with interest at the rate of five per cent, per annum, from the 17th day of May, 1858, and cosía in both courts.