Court Opinion

ID: 7991984
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 01:32:15.110192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:35:24.269762
License: Public Domain

Smith, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit upon a life insurance policy issued by appellant. At the close of the evidence the court below peremptorily charged the jury to find for the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and twenty-five dollars, and there was a verdict and judgment accordingly. *664■An appeal was taken to this court, and the cause now comes on to be heard on motion of appellee to dismiss on the ground that the judgment appealed from was “a judgment by confession.” .
The judgment does not recite that it.is “a judgment by confession;” but it appears from the allegations of the motion for a new trial, and from the order by which this motion was overruled, that the peremptory instruction was granted at the request of counsel, both for plaintiff and defendant, pursuant to an agreement between them that this should be -done, and judgment be rendered for the plaintiff for one hundred and twenty-five dollars, instead of one hundred and sixty-five dollars, the amount originally demanded by him.
It may be true, as alleged in- the motion for" a new trial, that counsel for appellant agreed to this disposition of the ease solely because he was unable to secure the presence of the witness by whom he expected to support his client’s contention. Nevertheless the fact remains that the peremptory, instruction was granted at his request; ■ consequently the judgment rendered was, to all intents and purposes, “a judgment by confession,” and from such a judgment no appeal will lie. Section 33, Code 1906.
The motion will be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

■Motion sustained.

Appeal dismissed.