Court Opinion

ID: 9961552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-19 13:00:51.939232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:58.396435
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10622   Document: 9-1     Date Filed: 04/19/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                              No. 24-10622
                         Non-Argument Calendar

      OPVHHJV LLC,
      d.b.a. Pathway Property Management,
      HPA II BORROWER 2021-1 LLC,
                                                   Plaintiﬀs-Appellees,
      versus
      RICHARD CORNELIUS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant,

      ANY OTHER OCCUPANTS,
USCA11 Case: 24-10622     Document: 9-1     Date Filed: 04/19/2024     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                24-10622

                                                               Defendant.

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Georgia
                    D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-06030-VMC

      Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia
      state court is not reviewable on appeal because the district court
      based its remand on a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
      See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d
      1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness,
      Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
      Further, the notice of removal did not cite 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or
      1443 as a basis for removal.
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.