Court Opinion

ID: 4281587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-06 15:00:40.460677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:58.717741
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                  NEOLOGY, INC.,
                     Appellant

                           v.

   KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS INC., KAPSCH
       TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP.,
                   Appellees
            ______________________

                 2017-1228, 2017-1229
                ______________________

   Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2015-00818, IPR2015-00819.
                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    ROBERT H. SLOSS, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Sa-
vitch LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also
represented by VICTOR FELIX, San Diego, CA.

    NATHAN S. MAMMEN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washing-
ton, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by GREGG
F. LOCASCIO.
                 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 6, 2018                 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                      Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court