Court Opinion

ID: 8450524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:04:14.906653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.093347
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Mark Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Johnson’s motion requesting oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.