Court Opinion

ID: 665054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:29:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:26.286390
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 11
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Casto ORTIZ, Plaintiff Appellant,v.L. REYNOLDS;  D. Dwisher;  M.C. Millard, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7291.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Jan. 20, 1994.Decided:  Feb. 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Cuort for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
Casto Ortiz, appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Ortiz v. Reynolds, No. CA-93-150 (W.D. Va.  Oct. 28, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED