Court Opinion

ID: 692552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:17:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:55.542455
License: Public Domain

51 F.3d 270
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Robert Walter WOLTZ, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.UNNAMED DOCTOR, M.D., Courthouse Court Facility;  UnnamedDoctor, D.D.S., Courthouse Court Facility;  Unnamed ChiefNurse, R.N., Courthouse Court Facility;  Warden, CourthouseCourt Facility;  Assistant Warden, Courthouse CourtFacility;  Chief of Security, Courthouse Court Facility;Shift Commander, 7-3 Shift, Courthouse Court Facility;Shift Commander, 3-11 Shift, Courthouse Court Facility;Shift Commander, 11-7 Shift, Courthouse Court Facility;Baltimore County, Maryland;  Unnamed Baltimore CountyExecutive;  County Council Persons 1-7, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7400.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 1994.Decided April 4, 1995.

Robert Walter Woltz, appellant pro se.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Woltz v. Unnamed Doctor, M.D., No. CA-94-2874-B (D. Md. Oct. 31, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.