Court Opinion

ID: 216645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-05-13 00:01:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:29.174377
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM
  
   **
  

  Memehua-Mixtecal claims that his December 3, 2009 group-plea hearing violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and his Fifth Amendment right to due process. The record patently demonstrates that Memehua-Mixtecal was sufficiently advised of his rights, that he af
   
   *704
   
  firmed his understanding of such rights, and that he expressly waived such rights by pleading guilty. As we have held, any Rule 11 violations from this hearing were harmless, and the hearing did not violate due process.
  
   See United States v. Escamilla-Rojas,
  
  640 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir.2011).
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   **
  

   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.