Court Opinion

ID: 628338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:08:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:48.764364
License: Public Domain

2 F.3d 1149
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Garland Lee GILES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 93-6495.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 16, 1993.Decided:  August 5, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge.  (CA-92-70-2)
Garland Lee Giles, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Garland Lee Giles appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion for Relief from Judgment (denying habeas corpus relief), pursuant to Fed.  R. Civ. P. 60(b).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Giles v. Murray, No. CA-92-70-2 (E.D. Va.  Apr. 26, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED