Court Opinion

ID: 4356730
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-08 14:09:12.516174+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:19:32.711522
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                       ATLANTA,____________________
                                                January 07, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0943. JEREMY HINTON v. THE STATE.

      In 2000, Jeremy Hinton was convicted of aggravated child molestation, child
molestation and false imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions on appeal.
See Hinton v. State, 253 Ga. App. 69 (557 SE2d 481) (2001). In 2017, Hinton filed
a motion to correct a void sentence. On September 21, 2017, the trial court denied
Hinton’s motion, and Hinton filed this appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
      First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order
sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice
of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.
State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Hinton filed his notice
of appeal on November 8, 2017, 48 days after entry of the trial court’s order, his
appeal is untimely.
      Second, even if Hinton’s appeal had been timely filed, this Court would still
lack jurisdiction. “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims
that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the
sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). And
a direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a void
sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact,
void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v.
State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). Hinton asserts that his sentence
is void because the trial court should have merged his conviction for child
molestation with his conviction for aggravated child molestation. But Hinton’s
merger argument is a challenge to his convictions, not to his sentence; thus, he has
failed to state a valid void-sentence claim, and his appeal is subject to dismissal. See
Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 193-194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010).
      For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         01/07/2019
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                               Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                        , Clerk.