Court Opinion

ID: 8470245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 11:48:42.629785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:17.585822
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Alexander appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion to the extent that Alexander sought a resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MR (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.