Court Opinion

ID: 8475085
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:18:57.146108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:24.751755
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Simmons appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Simmons, No. 3:07-cr-00041-JPB-DJJ-2, 2009 WL 2877236 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.