Court Opinion

ID: 2922055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:51:48.716553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:17.626866
License: Public Domain

CAUSE NUMBER 13-05-00656-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
 
                                           IN
RE: DAVE TODD, III
____________________________________________________________
 
                                  On
Petition for Writ of Mandamus
 ____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                     Before
Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez 
                                Per
Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
 
Relator, Dave Todd, III, filed a petition for writ
of mandamus in the above cause on October 24, 2005.  The Court requested that the real party in
interest, the State of Texas by and through the District Attorney in and for
Nueces County, Texas, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on
or before November 14, 2005.  The
response was filed on November 10, 2005. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the
petition for writ of mandamus and response, is of the opinion that this
original proceeding should be DENIED as moot. Accordingly, the petition for
writ of mandamus is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 
 
PER CURIAM
 
 
Do
not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
 
Memorandum
Opinion delivered and filed
this
22nd day of November, 2005.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[1]
See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may
hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum
opinions).