Court Opinion

ID: 9897517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-14 19:15:30.402976+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:17.930662
License: Public Domain

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                              SUPREME COURT

     In Case No. 2022-0207, State of New Hampshire v. Richard
Mooney, the court on September 14, 2023, issued the following
order:

       The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on
appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct.
R. 20(2). The defendant, Richard Mooney, appeals an order of the Superior Court
(Kissinger, J.), issued following a hearing, requiring him to pay restitution in the
amount of $43,469.72. See RSA 651:63 (Supp. 2022). The defendant argues
that the evidence was insufficient to support the amount of restitution ordered.
As the appealing party, the defendant has the burden of demonstrating reversible
error. Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014). Based upon our review of the
trial court’s well-reasoned order, the defendant’s challenges to it, the relevant
law, and the record submitted on appeal, we conclude that the defendant has not
demonstrated reversible error and affirm the court’s decision. See id.; Sup. Ct. R.
25(8).

                                                   Affirmed.

     MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

                                                   Timothy A. Gudas,
                                                        Clerk