Court Opinion

ID: 9757329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 22:33:12.573016+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:38.211364
License: Public Domain

Duncan, J.,
dissenting: The record in this case contains no finding, and in my opinion would support no finding, of the existence of any “special conditions” (RSA .31:72 III) with respect to the residential premises in question which would justify the granting of a variance for the proposed business use, in a residential zone, where residential uses prevail, at least in the immediate neighborhood. Cf. Bouley v. Nashua, 106 N. H. 79, 84. See St. Onge v. Concord, 95 N. H. 306, 310 (dissenting opinion); RSA 31:60-62.