Court Opinion

ID: 5222725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:37:44.835347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:32.400538
License: Public Domain

Scott, J.:
Defendant appeals from an order granting an injunction pendente lite.
The action is to enjoin -the use by defendant of its own premises in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance- as to plaintiff’s property. The rule respecting the use of one’s own premises where it unfavorably affects adjacent premises is well settled. If the úse is reasonable there can he no private nuisance, hut if the use is unreasonable and results in substantial injury an actionable nuisance exists, and whether a given use is reasonable or not is a question of fact depending on many and varied -facts. (McCarty v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40.) That, ordinarily, is a question to he determined úpon the trial and should not he determined in advance upon a preliminary motion unless the plaintiff’s right to relief is clear and practically beyond dispute, and more especially is this true where there is no doubt suggested as to the ability of the defendant to respond in damages. The order appealed from is in effect a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant to make important structural changes in its building, or to discontinue business altogether. By the order the litigation *155is in. effect determined, and gives to plaintiff the same relief which he seeks to obtain by judgment. Such orders should be granted with great caution and only under exceptional circumstances. (Maloney v. Katzenstein, 135 App. Div. 224.) This is not such a case. The defendant has already offered to remove at its own expense all cause for complaint by a method which involves the acquiescence of plaintiff, and we are by no means satisfied that plaintiff was not unreasonable, under all the circumstances, in withholding his acquiescence. This is one of the questions which can best be answered at the trial.
The order should he reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Hiller, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.