Court Opinion

ID: 7774324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:59:02.456812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:05.373499
License: Public Domain

| jFITZSIMMONS, Judge,
concurring, with reasons.
I respectfully concur. While I do not agree that this court can ignore the word “secondary” as it is used in La. R.S. 9:315.22 D, the record reasonably supports a finding that the school in question is considered by the representative of the local school board to be within the broad definition of a secondary school. However, this finding is limited to the particular facts of this case, and cannot serve as a basis for finding that all special schools may be categorized as secondary schools. If the legislature meant to extend child support for all special children enrolled in *112any type of school, the legislature should delete the word “secondary” from the statute.