Court Opinion

ID: 9363488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-16 00:11:37.224433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:32.178155
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2023.

                                      In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-21-00683-CR

                   KEVIN JERMAIN BURRELL, Appellant
                                        V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 248th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Cause No. 1568829

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for invasive visual recording.
See Tex. Penal Code § 21.15(b)(2). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting
a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978).
      A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who filed a pro se
response, but the response provides no arguable grounds for appeal. Instead, the
response refers to factual matters outside of the record, and indicates that appellant
is seeking other relief through an application for writ of habeas corpus.

      We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s
response and we agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we
find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim
raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no
arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005).

      The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

                                              PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                          2