Court Opinion

ID: 222249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-01 18:44:54+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:09.306912
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 11-1198

GREG GIVENS,

                      Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.;
JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I,

                      Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH)

Submitted:   July 28, 2011                 Decided:   August 1, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

              Greg    Givens   appeals       the   district     court’s   order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).        We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.         Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH

(E.D.   Va.    Jan.   10,   2011).   We       dispense   with   oral   argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                         2