Court Opinion

ID: 4692225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-02 18:00:48.749266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:53.277175
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-20302     Document: 00515883918         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/02/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                          June 2, 2021
                                  No. 20-20302                          Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                           Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Cayetano Rosales Vasquez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:20-CR-105-1

   Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cayetano
   Rosales Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rosales Vasquez has not filed a

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20302     Document: 00515883918         Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/02/2021

                                  No. 20-20302

   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2