Court Opinion

ID: 1005913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:03:24.531138+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:42.771913
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Jack Hinchman appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reimbursement. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Hinchman v. Prime Care Medical,
  
  No. CA-01-93-1 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.