Court Opinion

ID: 2965013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:34:11.700897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:22.790249
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-1158

                              GERMAIN RAMIREZ-FERNANDEZ,

                                Petitioner, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Respondent, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
                                          ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Germain Ramirez-Fernandez on brief pro se.
            _________________________
            Jay P.  McCloskey, United  States Attorney,  and F. Mark  Terison,
            _________________                                ________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                  December 22, 1997
                                 ____________________

                      Per  Curiam.  We have carefully reviewed the briefs
                      ___________

            and the record  on appeal.    We  affirm essentially for  the

            reasons   given  by  Magistrate   Judge  in  his  Recommended

            Decision, which was adopted by the District Court. 

                      Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                      ________

                                         -2-