Court Opinion

ID: 9423989
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:09:50.433439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.363694
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Fortas,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment of the Court and in its opinion except to the extent that the opinion relies upon the Court’s opinion in the Missouri redistricting cases, Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, ante, p. 526, which I have not joined for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in those cases.
New York does not attempt to defend its plan as a good-faith effort to achieve districts of approximate equality. It argues that it devised a plan based upon the grouping of districts into regions. I agree with the majority that, for purposes of the congressional district-ing here involved, the State may not substantially or grossly disregard population or residence figures in order to recognize regional groupings within the State. See my dissent in Avery v. Midland County, 390 U. S. 474, 495 (1968).