Court Opinion

ID: 9652043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 17:13:01.964885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:47.144580
License: Public Domain

BRYAN, Judge,
concurring in the result.
In my opinion, it is solely the fact that the divorce judgment “unconditionally required the [former] husband to pay the mortgage in full,” Cherry v. Cherry, 422 So.2d 784, 786 (Ala.Civ.App.1982), that mandates the conclusion that the mortgage payments in this case are alimony in gross. Because the main opinion bases its conclusion not only on that fact but also on the *488fact that the wife’s right to live in the home was vested, I concur in the result.