Court Opinion

ID: 565531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:12:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:01.828317
License: Public Domain

940 F.2d 654Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Edward S. WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7542.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 19, 1991.Decided July 30, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  John R. Hargrove, District Judge.  (CR-88-428-HAR)
Edward S. Watson, appellant pro se.
David Paul King, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Edward S. Watson appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion for Correction of Illegal Sentence," which he filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Watson, CR-88-428-HAR (D.Md. Mar. 4, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.