Court Opinion

ID: 9807449
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 20:04:57.32206+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:37:37.105507
License: Public Domain

Connor, J.
I concur in the decision of the Court in this appeal that there was no error in the trial of this action in the Superior Court.
Upon objection by the plaintiff to testimony of a physician, who was offered as a witness by the defendant, as to matters within his knowledge which he knew by reason of his relation to the insured as his physician, the defendant moved the court to overrule the objection and admit the testimony as evidence in its behalf, in its discretion, C. S., 1798. The motion was denied, and the testimony excluded by the court, in its discretion. For that reason the ruling of the trial court is not reviewable by this Court.
The defendant did not rely upon the waiver of such objection, contained in the application of the insured for the certificate of insurance, on which the plaintiff has sued in this action. The question as to the effect of the waiver upon the statute is not presented or decided on this appeal. There was no ruling by the trial court upon this question.