Court Opinion

ID: 9797558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 04:24:05.797736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:57:10.390626
License: Public Domain

UPON PETITION FOR REHEARING
So far as we can tell from the record before us, in his petition for rehearing Denny contends for the first time in the case that his offer had lapsed by the time the parties talked over the phone on June 27, 2002. Because this contention was not raised in either of Denny’s briefs, we consider it not properly before us and, consequently, do not address it. See Elrick v. Merrill, 10 P.3d 689, 696 (Colo.App. 2000); Kelly v. Cent. Bank & Trust, 794 P.2d 1037, 1044-45 (Colo.App. 1989).
Denny’s petition for rehearing is denied.
Judge HAWTHORNE and Judge FURMAN concur.