Court Opinion

ID: 3623136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 00:04:27.992065+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:58:47.193083
License: Public Domain

The mortgage, through the foreclosure of which the defendants derived their title, was prior to the agreement between the mortgagor and the plaintiff. The title taken by the foreclosure vested by relation as of the time mortgage was made. (Rector,etc., v. Mack, 93 N.Y. 488; Batterman v. Albright,
122 id. 484.) It does not appear that the mortgagee in any manner assented to such agreement.
In Sheldon v. Edwards (35 N.Y. 279) the arrangement that the property there in question should be treated as personal was made between the mortgagor and mortgagee.
In Tifft v. Horton (55 N.Y. 377) there was a stipulation of the mortgagee made before the sale that the legal rights of the plaintiff should not be changed by the foreclosure sale.
In Globe M.M. Co. v. Quinn (76 N.Y. 23) the plaintiff was assignee of lease of the premises made prior to the mortgage, and in Tyson v. Post (108 N.Y. 217) the mortgagee was a party to the agreement that the property in controversy there should remain personal.
I concur in affirmance.
BROWN and VANN, JJ., concur with FOLLETT, Ch. J., HAIGHT, J., concurs with BRADLEY, J. PARKER, J., dissents, and LANDON, J., does not sit.
Judgment affirmed. *Page 495