Court Opinion

ID: 4459917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-27 19:00:31.285397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:29.594389
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10494      Document: 00515216497        Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/27/2019

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                    No. 19-10494                       November 27, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

SUSANN NELSON,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 3:17-CR-449-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Susann Nelson

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10494   Document: 00515216497    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/27/2019

                               No. 19-10494

moves to withdraw and files a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nelson has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant por-
tions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pre-
sents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibili-
ties herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2