Court Opinion

ID: 5203366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 15:56:50.467882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:14.287923
License: Public Domain

Clarke, J.;
This action was tried before the same refere'e and at the same time as actions Nos. 2 and 3*, opinions wherein are herewith handed ¡down, and presented' the same general features, the mortgage foreclosed being upon a house, adjacent to the two covered by the former actions. -
In this case the referee excluded all the documentary evidence and made similar findings to those considered in the two prior cases, including the finding as to the appointment and qualification of ■ Preston as receiver, the evidence to establish which he had excluded.
This judgment must also be reversed and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Ingba-ham, Lahghlin, Scott and Lambert, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed, new trial ordered before another referee, costs to appellant to abide event. Settle order on notice.

 Preston v. Albee, No. 2 (120 App. Div. 89); Preston v. Arthur, No. 3 (Id. 93)—[Rep.