Court Opinion

ID: 4571571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-30 22:11:44.077199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:05.038655
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Mann, 2020-Ohio-4644.]

                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                               ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                    TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO,                                   :        MEMORANDUM OPINION

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
                                                          CASE NO. 2020-T-0045
        - vs -                                   :

LOUIS R. MANN,                                   :

                 Defendant-Appellant.            :

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2011 CR 00605.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, and Ashleigh Musick, Assistant
Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH
44481-1092 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Louis R. Mann, pro se, PID: A651-050, Lorain Correctional Institution, 2075 South
Avon Belden Road, Grafton, OH 44044 (Defendant-Appellant).

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.

        {¶1}     Appellant, Louis R. Mann, pro se, filed a motion for leave to file a delayed

appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A), and a notice of appeal, on August 5, 2020, from a

December 11, 2013 sentencing entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas.

        {¶2}     A jury found appellant guilty of counts one and two, aggravated murder

with specifications of aggravating circumstances, and count three, aggravated robbery
with a firearm specification. Count three was merged for sentencing with counts one

and two, and appellant was sentenced to serve life in prison without parole.

       {¶3}   A timely notice of appeal from the December 11, 2013 judgment was due

no later than January 10, 2014, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, this

appeal is untimely filed by nearly six years and nine months.

       {¶4}   Appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a response in opposition to appellant’s

motion for delayed appeal.

       {¶5}   App.R. 5(A)(1) provides:

       {¶6}   “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the

filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave

of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

       {¶7}   “(a) Criminal proceedings * * *”

       {¶8}   App.R. 4(A)(1) states:

       {¶9}   “* * * a party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 with 30 days of that entry.”

       {¶10} As reasons for failing to file a timely appeal, appellant asserts that the trial

court and his trial counsel failed to inform him of his right to appeal and have counsel

appointed to represent him to file an appeal. He claims that he was just made aware of

these rights on July 28, 2020, after speaking to an inmate law clerk.

       {¶11} Appellee argues that the record belies appellant’s claim where the

sentencing entry states at ¶ 7 and 8:

                                             2
       {¶12} “The Court further advised the Defendant of his right to appeal pursuant to

Criminal Rule 32(B) and his right to have appellant [sic] counsel appointed pursuant to

Criminal Rule 44.

       {¶13} “The Defendant, as well as counsel for the Defendant, on the record and

in open court, advised the Court that the Defendant wished to waive his right to appeal.

The Court then addressed counsel for the Defendant and further personally addressed

and inquired of the Defendant, on the record and in open court, of the consequences of

waiving those rights, and hereby finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently,

and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and to have counsel appointed for appellate

purposes.”

       {¶14} Upon consideration of the foregoing, we find that appellant’s reasons do

not justify an over six and one-half year delay in filing his appeal as of right. Therefore,

appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is hereby overruled.

       {¶15} Appeal dismissed.

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.

                                             3