Court Opinion

ID: 9462384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 22:39:52.429269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:37:34.085380
License: Public Domain

*939OPINION
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The reasons for the Board’s order are briefly but adequately stated in its decisions in this unfair labor practice proceeding (210 NLRB No. 117) and the underlying representation proceeding. They have support in the record and reflect a reasonable interpretation of the statute. See NLRB v. Staiman Bros., 466 F.2d 564, 566 (3rd Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co., 438 F.2d 112, 113 (9th Cir. 1971); Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 903, 908 (6th Cir. 1968); Trailmobile Division Pullman, Inc. v. NLRB, 379 F.2d 419, 423 (5th Cir. 1967).
The Board’s order will be enforced.