Court Opinion

ID: 8441560
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:46:57.793471+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.725176
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we af*678firm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG, 2011 WL 1543301 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.