Court Opinion

ID: 244440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:33:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:35.267521
License: Public Domain

252 F.2d 959
John CAVANAUGH, Appellant,v.Charles J. LONG, Appellee.
No. 15530.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
February 24, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; John R. Ross, Judge.
Grubic, Drendel & Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant.
Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Franklin P. R. Rittenhouse, U. S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.
Before HEALY, LEMMON, and BARNES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM.

1
The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 555.