Court Opinion

ID: 9744600
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 22:09:13.163694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:50.309369
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
Arterburn, J.
The appellant has asked for a rehearing in this appeal and points out an error in the statement in the opinion where we state that the appellant and appellee “took part in normal social activities together, including those in connection with the schooling of their older child.” This is a misstatement, since the child was not of school age. We should have stated that the two children of the former marriage of the appellee were the subject of the school activities.
The evidence does show that they were registered at school when they first entered under the name of their father; that thereafter the registration was changed to “Reger” because the appellant objected to the use of the father’s name in his presence. They continued to use the name Reger with the consent of the appellant during their schooling and while the appellant and appellee lived together.
The misstatement in the opinion is not material and does not change the essential facts upon which it is based.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Achor, C. J., Jackson, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.
Note. — Reported in 177 N. E. 2d 901. Rehearing denied 178 N. E. 2d 749.