Court Opinion

ID: 3671874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:20:01.542621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:08.202763
License: Public Domain

It is alleged in the complaint that in the course of negotiations between W. B. Blades and the defendant the parties agreed that the plaintiffs should convey to the defendant a certain lot in the city of New Bern for the purpose of securing the payment of $20,000 with interest, and that upon payment of this amount the defendant should reconvey the lot to the feme plaintiff. The complaint and the answer raise issues of fact which, nothing else appearing, would require the intervention of a jury; but the defendant alleges that the plaintiffs' cause of action is invalid because a parol trust cannot be created by agreement of the parties in favor of the grantors in the deed or either of them. We may say without debating this question that it does not *Page 445 
necessarily appear from the record that the creation of the alleged trust is to be established, if at all, by oral testimony; and upon the facts as disclosed by the record we find no sufficient cause for reversing the judgment. The judgment contains the recital that a continuance of the restraining order will not irreparably harm the defendant and that a dissolution of it might cause great injury to the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.