Court Opinion

ID: 8097597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:21:20.945592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:35.001633
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Lawrence, J.
At the hearing it was agreed between the parties that the merchandise in controversy consisted of aluminum nonferrous ore manufactures and did not consist of ores or concentrates or other crude substances. Uncontradicted evidence was introduced to the effect that the articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and that they have been used in remanufacture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.