Court Opinion

ID: 4708341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-02 13:03:58.60788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:50.171955
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL MAHAFFEY and            )
PAULA MAHAFFEY,                 )
                                )                  C.A. No. K21C-06-039 NEP
          Plaintiffs,           )
                                )
     v.                         )
                                )
                                )
BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, INC., )
and LOUIS E. COSTA, D.O.,       )
                                )
          Defendants.           )

                                     ORDER

                             Submitted: July 28, 2021
                              Decided: July 30, 2021

                      Upon Review of the Affidavit of Merit
                                ACCEPTED

      1.     This matter involves a healthcare negligence suit filed by Plaintiffs
Michael Mahaffey and Paula Mahaffey (“Plaintiffs”) against Bayhealth Medical
Center, Inc. (“Bayhealth”) and Louis E. Costa, D.O. (“Dr. Costa,” and together with
Bayhealth, “Defendants”). Bayhealth and Dr. Costa have each submitted a motion
asking the Court to review the affidavit of merit filed in this case to determine
whether it satisfies 18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1) and (c). The Court has considered the
two motions together in the interest of judicial economy.
      2.     Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on June 25, 2021, alleging medical
negligence by Bayhealth and by Dr. Costa. The Complaint also asserts a claim
against Defendants for loss of consortium and a separate respondeat superior claim
against Bayhealth for the conduct of Dr. Costa.
          3.     In Delaware, a healthcare negligence lawsuit must be filed with an
affidavit of merit as to each defendant, signed by an expert, and accompanied by the
expert’s current curriculum vitae.1 The expert must be licensed to practice medicine
as of the affidavit’s date, engaged in such practice in the same or similar field as the
defendant in the three years immediately preceding the alleged negligence, and
Board certified in the same or similar field as the defendant if the defendant is Board
certified.2 The affidavit must also state that reasonable grounds exist to believe that
the applicable standard of care was breached by the defendant and that the breach
was a proximate cause of injury alleged in the complaint.3 Additionally, the affidavit
must be filed under seal and, upon request, may be reviewed in camera to ensure
compliance with statutory requirements.4                The affidavit’s requirements are
“purposefully minimal.”5 Affidavits that merely track the statutory language are
deemed sufficient.6
          4.     With regard to the affidavit of merit that was filed along with the
Complaint, the Court has performed an in camera review.

1
    18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1).
2
  Id. § 6853(c). Of course, these requirements apply only if the expert is a physician, and the
requirements regarding “same or similar field” apply only if the defendant is a physician. McNulty
v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, 2017 WL 1323711, at *2 (Del. Super. Apr. 7, 2017) (requirement
of “same or similar” Board certification does not apply where defendant is not a physician); accord
Zappaterrini v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2009 WL 1101618, at *1 (Del. Super. Apr. 22, 2019)
(“[B]ecause the defendant is not a physician, the statutory requirement of similar Board
certification is not applicable.”). Here, Plaintiff alleges negligence against Bayhealth based on
agency principles. Thus, while the statutory requirements of “same or similar field” are applicable
with respect to Dr. Costa, they are not applicable with respect to Bayhealth because it is not a
physician.
3
    18 Del. C. § 6853(c).
4
    Id. § 6853(d).
5
 Mammarella v. Evantash, 93 A.3d 629, 637 (Del. 2014) (quoting Dishmon v. Fucci, 32 A.3d 338,
342 (Del. 2011)).
6
    Dishmon, 32 A.3d at 342-43.
                                                2
      5.    Turning to the expert in question, the Court finds as follows:
            a. The expert signed the affidavit.
            b. The current curriculum vitae of the expert is attached.
            c. The expert was licensed to practice medicine as of the date of the
                affidavit.
            d. For the three years immediately preceding the alleged negligent
                conduct, the expert was engaged in the treatment of patients in the
                same or similar field as Dr. Costa and performed surgical procedures
                and provided post-operative care such as the procedures and care
                rendered by Dr. Costa to Plaintiff Michael Mahaffey, and the expert
                is Board certified by the American Board of Surgery in a similar
                field to that of Dr. Costa.
            e. The affidavit states that there are reasonable grounds to believe that
                the applicable standard of care was breached by Defendants and that
                those breaches were a proximate cause of Mr. Mahaffey’s injuries.
      WHEREFORE, in consideration of the above, the Court finds that the
affidavit of merit filed with the Court on June 25, 2021, complies with 18 Del. C. §
6853(a)(1) and (c) as to both Bayhealth and Dr. Costa.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                   /s/ Noel Eason Primos
                                                              Judge

NEP/wjs
via File & ServeXpress
oc: Prothonotary
       Counsel of Record

                                              3