Court Opinion

ID: 8455603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:37:45.408371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.587165
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ralph J. Curry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curry v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-00151-BEL (D. Md. filed Sept. 5, 2008 & entered Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Curry’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.