Court Opinion

ID: 2922904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:24:48.555876+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:15.232941
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-630-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE JOE WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION CO.

  ________________________________________________________________ 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, Joe Williamson Construction Co., filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in the above cause on November 9, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition for writ of mandamus and appendix is of the opinion that
relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition
for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

										PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 14th day of November, 2006.

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).