Court Opinion

ID: 2900730
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 16:31:31.295255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:30.907552
License: Public Domain

Criminal Case Template

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

KEVIN DEE HARDIN,

                            Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                            Appellee.
§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-03-00072-CR

Appeal from the

142nd District Court

of Midland County, Texas

(TC# CR27709)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

	This is an appeal from a revocation of probation proceeding.  Appellant was originally
placed on probation for the offense of failure to appear for felony charge.  The court revoked
Appellant's probation and assessed punishment at two (2) years' confinement in the State Jail
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a fine of $500.  We affirm.
	Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that
the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87
S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might
arguably support the appeal.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978);
Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553
(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy
of counsel's brief and the appellate record have been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant
has been advised of his right to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal
is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might
arguably support the appeal.  A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief
would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
	The judgment is affirmed.
June 30, 2003

						_______________________________________
						RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

Before Panel No. 3
Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and Chew, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)