Court Opinion

ID: 3197870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-26 19:00:56.806606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:11.886398
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Michael Anthony Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion requesting copies of certain documents at the government’s expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Richardson,
  
  No. 3:13-cr-00115-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense'with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.