Court Opinion

ID: 51478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:05:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:25.924813
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit
                                                                                 F I L E D
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 19, 2007
                                                July
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                              Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                      Clerk

                                     No. 07-60083
                                   Summary Calendar

EVA QUINONES

                                                  Petitioner - Appellant
v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

                                                  Respondent - Appellee

              Appeal from a Decison of the United States Tax Court
                                  No. 1414-05

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Petitioner - appellant Eva Quinones appeals the tax court’s denial of her
motion to vacate its earlier decision. Because the tax court lacked jurisdiction
to vacate its decision after the decision became final under § 7481 of the Internal
Revenue Code, we AFFIRM.
       On February 17, 2006, the tax court dismissed Quinones’s case for failure
to prosecute and entered a decision sustaining the government’s determination
of the tax due. On March 27, 2006, Quinones filed a timely motion to vacate the

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                         No. 07-60083

decision, which the tax court denied on April 13, 2006. On October 23, 2006,
Quinones filed a motion for leave to file an untimely motion to vacate the
decision. The tax court denied that motion as well as a subsequent motion to
reconsider.
       Whether the tax court had jurisdiction to vacate a final decision is a
question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Harbold v. Comm’r, 51 F.3d 618, 621
(6th Cir. 1995). Pursuant to §§ 7481(a) and 7483 of the Internal Revenue Code,
a tax court decision becomes final once the time period for filing a notice of
appeal has expired, if no notice of appeal was filed during that time.1 I.R.C.
§§ 7481(a), 7483. The notice of appeal must be filed “with the clerk of the Tax
Court within 90 days after the decision of the Tax Court is entered.” I.R.C.
§ 7483. A timely motion to vacate the tax court’s decision extends that time to
run from the order disposing of the motion. FED. R. APP. P. 13(a)(2). As a
general rule, once a decision of the tax court becomes final, the tax court lacks
jurisdiction to vacate that decision. See, e.g., Davenport Recycling Assoc. v.
Comm’r, 220 F.3d 1255, 1259 (11th Cir. 2000).
       Quinones did not file a notice of appeal from the tax court’s February 17,
2006 decision within the time limits set forth in § 7483. As a result, under
§ 7481(a), the tax court’s decision became final on July 12, 2006, ninety days
after the April 13, 2006 order disposing of the timely motion to vacate the
decision. Because Quinones filed her second motion to vacate approximately
three months after the decision became final, the tax court lacked jurisdiction
to vacate its decision and properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we need not
reach the merits of this appeal. We AFFIRM.

       1
         I.R.C. § 7481 provides that “the decision of the Tax Court shall become final . . . [u]pon
the expiration of the time allowed for filing a notice of appeal, if no such notice has been duly
filed within such time.”

                                                2