Court Opinion

ID: 9322287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 18:21:29.889134+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:41.092226
License: Public Domain

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
[1] The plaintiff offered the defendant a contract to employ him for certain specified periods at a fixed compensation on condition that it should have the right to discharge him upon ten days’ notice, and the defendant accepted that offer in writing. This made a valid and binding contract, especially after the defendant entered upon the performance of the contract and received the compensation there specified during a part of the term. The plaintiff’s contract and the payment of the wages for this part of the term constitute a valuable consideration for the agreement. It is a settled rule of law that where a person agrees to render services that are unique and extraordinary, and which may not be rendered by another, and has made a negative covenant in his agreement whereby he promises not to render such service to others, the court may issue an injunction to prevent him from violating the negative covenant in order to induce him to perform his contract. The facts of this case seem to me to bring it under this rule.
[2] Another established rule of equity is that, where the refusal of an injunction may, and probably will, inflict great damage upon the plaintiff which is likely to be irreparable if the injunction is refused, while by a bond or otherwise the defendant may be saved from loss *270or injury if it is granted, an injunction may be and ought to be granted to hold the parties' and the situation in the same condition in which it was at the time of the attempted breach of the contract until there may be a trial of the issues the suit presents. This case falls under this rule of law, and the order of the court will be that an injunction issue against the defendant forbidding him from rendering his services as a hall player to any one other than the complainant until the final decision
that the plaintiff gives a bond in the sum of $13,000 with ample security to pay any damages that may result to the defendant from the issue of this injunction.
Let the order for the injunction and the injunction also provide that they shall cease to have effect and become dissolved whenever the complainant and pay the defendant according to its terms.