Court Opinion

ID: 8433971
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 10:04:01.625292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:40.428924
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM ***
Istvan Csutai, a native and citizen of Hungary, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. The BIA offered specific, cogent reasons for the decision based on inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony, asylum application, and documentary evidence, including with regard to his arrests and injuries. See id. at 1043; Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1151-53 (9th Cir.1999).
Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he is eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).
In addition, substantial evidence supports the denial of relief under CAT. See id. at 1157.
The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.