Court Opinion

ID: 997930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:03:54.882029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:42.313496
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7638

RUSSELL D. RHYNE,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

CHARLES CREECY,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-98-333-3-2-MU)

Submitted:   February 11, 1999          Decided:     February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell D. Rhyne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Russell Rhyne seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Rhyne v. Creecy, No. CA-98-333-

3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2