Court Opinion

ID: 592474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:00.848060
License: Public Domain

977 F.2d 574
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Stephen Warren SETLIFF, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6575.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 27, 1992.Decided Sept. 28, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem, Nos.  CR-87-244-WS, CA-91-280-6;  Richard C. Erwin, Chief District Judge.
Stephen Warren Setliff, appellant pro se.
Douglas Cannon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, N.C., for appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Stephen Warren Setliff appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Setliff, Nos.  CR-87-244-WS, CA-91-280-6 (M.D.N.C. May 7, 1992).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.