Court Opinion

ID: 9863283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 03:20:26.435626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:40:33.975497
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of, among other things, burglary of a habitation and escape. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s convictions. Francis v. State, 896 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995) (not yet reported). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ holding that a police officer’s initial seizure of appellant was “a classic example of a valid temporary investigative detention.”
We now find that our decision to grant appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. See Tex.RApp.Pro. *177202(k). Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
CLINTON, J., dissents.