Court Opinion

ID: 1005494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:34.204893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:37.043066
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                 No. 01-7121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

STEVE LUCAS,

                                                   Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-99-233, CA-00-848-1)

Submitted:     October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Steve Lucas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

United States v. Lucas, Nos. CR-99-233; CA-00-848-1 (M.D.N.C. filed

Apr. 26, 2001; entered Apr. 27, 2001).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2