Court Opinion

ID: 8770769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 12:43:22.423139+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:12.009487
License: Public Domain

WARD, Circuit Judge.
The libelants are the owners of a floating dry dock attached to the north side of the pier at the foot of Fourth street, East River. It consists of a pontoon, with bulkheads extending 200 feet on each side; the one on the pier side having four wooden collars or saddles, about 50 feet apart, which run up and down on four 20x20 oak spuds driven 16 feet into the bottom, their upper ends being clamped to the pier. This system allows the dock to slide up and down on the spuds with the tide, or as it is pumped out or filled with water.
On the morning of July 11, 1905, the dock, containing about 3,400 tons of water, was caused to surge to and from the pier, as well as forward and backward, to such an extent that the innermost and outermost spuds were strained, so that they were cracked lengthwise, their saddles parted, and the saddles of the middle spuds loosened. The District Judge rightly found that this extraordinary motion was caused by the displacement waves of the respondent’s steamer, William G. Payne, coming down the river on a flood tide at an excessive rate of *286speed. But he also found the libelants at fault as to the construction of the dock, in that they should have given the saddles on the innermost and outermost spuds more play; the movement of the dock being greater there than at the middle spuds. Inasmuch as the dock had been used at this same place continuously for five years without sustaining damage of any consequence from passing steamers, ■ we think the libelants cannot be fairly charged with lack of care or skill in its construction.
The decree is reversed, and the court below directed to enter a decree for the libelants for the full amount of the damage .sustained, with interest and costs of both courts.