Court Opinion

ID: 4214395
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-25 00:01:47.275834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:59.459864
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-20105      Document: 00514207509         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/24/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-20105
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         October 24, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DENNIS ALEXIS LANZA-GUILLEN, also known as Dennis Lanza, also
known as Dennis Alexis Lanza Guillen,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:16-CR-43-1

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dennis Alexis
Lanza-Guillen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lanza-Guillen has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-20105    Document: 00514207509   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/24/2017

                               No. 17-20105

reflected therein.   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2