Court Opinion

ID: 9881666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-03 17:19:34.486324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:17.758587
License: Public Domain

Filed 10/3/23 P. v. Kudelka CA2/6
     NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,                                                  2d Crim. No. B327233
                                                          (Super. Ct. No. 2021013083)
     Plaintiff and Respondent,                                 (Ventura County)

v.

VINCENT PHILLIP
KUDELKA,

     Defendant and Appellant.

       In 2022, Vincent Phillip Kudelka pleaded guilty to domestic
violence after assaulting his girlfriend. (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd.
(a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed
him on three years of formal probation. As a term of his
probation, Kudelka was prohibited from possessing body armor.
       During a probation search, police arrested Kudelka for
possession of body armor. (Pen. Code, § 31360, subd. (a).)
Kudelka subsequently admitted that he had violated the terms of
his probation. The trial court revoked probation and sentenced
him to three years in state prison.
      We appointed counsel to represent Kudelka in this appeal.
After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that
raises no arguable issues. On July 20, 2023, we advised Kudelka
by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any
contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not
received a response.
      We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
Kudelka’s attorney fully complied with his responsibilities and
that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d
436, 441.)
                          DISPOSITION
      The judgment is affirmed.
      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                    BALTODANO, J.

We concur:

             YEGAN, Acting P. J.

             CODY, J.

                                2
                 Catherine M. Voelker, Judge

              Superior Court County of Ventura

               ______________________________

     Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.