Court Opinion

ID: 1002823
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:16:38.65787+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:30.991536
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-6996

LOUIS SMITH,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

                                                Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-00-188-5-HO)

Submitted:     October 17, 2000             Decided:   October 26, 2000

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Louis Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Smith v. North Carolina, No. CA-00-188-

5-HO (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2000).   We deny Smith’s motion for appoint-

ment of counsel.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2