Court Opinion

ID: 4691495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-31 07:23:36.546373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:59.727435
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-92,586-01

                       EX PARTE JOHNNY RICHARDSON, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 1624475-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to forty

years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel was ineffective. He

also contends that he was denied the right to effective assistance of trial during the time period for

filing a motion for new trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle to relief.

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,
                                                                                                       2

the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at the hearing. See TEX .

CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court should also make findings

related to the time gap between when Applicant mailed his pro se motions and when the trial court

time-stamped these motions as filed. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions

that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed:         May 26, 2021
Do not publish