Court Opinion

ID: 627555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:00:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:53.431467
License: Public Domain

1 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Wayne E. JOYNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James DUNNING, Sheriff;  Richard R. Ruscak, Undersheriff;Debra L. Pierson, Captain of Security;  John L. Griggs,Captain for Inmate Services;  John Williams, ProgramCoordinator, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6047.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 18, 1993.Decided:  July 30, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-92-774-R)
Wayne E. Joyner, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Wayne E. Joyner appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Joyner v. Dunning, No. CA-92-774-R (E.D. Va.  Dec. 2, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Joyner's motion for oral argument