Court Opinion

ID: 2964430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:25:32.557563+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:11:10.216179
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1593

                                  LJUBICA RAJKOVIC,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                           LAVERDE'S MARKET, INC., ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Ljubica Rajkovic on brief pro se.
            ________________
            John  Foskett, Marnie  J. Wortzman,  and Deutsch  Williams  Brooks
            _____________  ___________________       _________________________
        DeRensis  Holland &  Drachman,  P.C. on  brief for  appellee Laverde's
        ____________________________________
        Market, Inc.

                                 ____________________

                                  November 14, 1996
                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the record in  this case,
                 __________

            including the briefs of the parties and the memorandum of the

            district  court.   We  agree  with  the district  court  that

            plaintiff/appellant  has failed to allege sufficient facts to

            support   her  allegations   that  she   suffered  employment

            discrimination.     Hence,   her  complaints   were  properly

            dismissed.

                 Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________  ___

                                         -2-