Court Opinion

ID: 607358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:25:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:24.523643
License: Public Domain

993 F.2d 1536
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Richard Lamar FENSTERMACHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bruce C. MORRIS, Commonwealth's Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6155.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 3, 1993Decided:  May 27, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-24-R)
Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Richard Lamar Fenstermacher appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Fenstermacher v. Morris, No. CA-9324-R (W.D. Va.  Jan. 15, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED