Court Opinion

ID: 7506374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:32:17.695603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:20.710501
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief for the reason that the motion is legally insufficient on its face. Appellant’s allegations concerning errors in a pre-sentence investigation report did not meet the standard of specificity required by Wood v. State, 375 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
AFFIRMED.
WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.