Court Opinion

ID: 7290865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 20:33:45.211909+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:19:17.095867
License: Public Domain

Per Cijriam.
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
Stillman v. Johnson—
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.
For reversal — None.
Freshmuth v. Johnson—
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.
For reversal — None.