Court Opinion

ID: 9381512
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-23 07:09:17.933605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:32.965655
License: Public Domain

In The
                                   Court of Appeals
                          Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                          No. 07-22-00290-CR

                           MARTIN CHARLES WILSON, APPELLANT

                                                   V.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                              On Appeal from the 213th District Court
                                       Tarrant County, Texas
                    Trial Court No. 1600734D, Honorable Chris Wolfe, Presiding

                                           March 17, 2023
                        ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                     Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

        Appellant, Martin Charles Wilson, appeals his conviction for murder1 and sentence

to life imprisonment.2 The appellate record was originally due January 4, 2023. The

clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was not.                        We

subsequently granted the reporter two extensions to file the reporter’s record due to her

        1   See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(c).
        2Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
caseload. By letter of February 7, 2023, we admonished the reporter that failure to file

the reporter’s record by March 6 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. The reporter

has since requested a third extension to file the reporter’s record due to her caseload.

        We deny the request, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring

appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to

preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,

the trial court shall determine the following:

        (1)    what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

        (2)    why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

        (3)    what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those

               tasks; and

        (4)    whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court

               finds reasonable.

        Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 17,

2023.

                                                 2
       Should the reporter file the record on or before March 31, 2023, she is directed to

immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not

be required to take any further action.

       It is so ordered.

                                                           Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                               3