Court Opinion

ID: 6255855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:30:35.581498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:32.779594
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for the death of her husband. The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to take off and this appeal followed.
The facts in brief are these: Adolph M. Dahl, the husband, while crossing the tracks of defendant company at a grade crossing at Verona Station, on September 16, 1920, intending to take the 7:30 a. m. train to Pittsburgh, the place of his employment, was struck and killed by an engine to which was attached a caboose car, ■preceding the train on which deceased purposed becoming a passenger. The witnesses called by plaintiff each testified they either heard the warning whistle of the approaching engine or the ringing of the bell as the engine came toward the crossing; in fact, Dahl, himself, heard the warning as he remarked to an acquaintance with whom he was conversing “That’s my train coming,” and started to cross the tracks to the station. Other witnesses who saw him on the crossing called to him to “Look out” and others said he was “within a foot of clearing the track when struck,” all of which indicates he walked in front of the train and in doing so failed to exercise reasonable care.
Although arriving and departing passengers are not under all circumstances obliged to stop, look and listen before crossing tracks at a railroad station in boarding and leaving trains (Weisenberg v. R. R. Co., 237 Pa. 33, 35) this rule does not relieve the passenger from the use of reasonable care: Lynn v. P. & L. E. R. R., 267 Pa. 41.
A careful examination of the testimony clearly establishes the contributory negligence of deceased and brings this case within the rule laid down in Lynn v. P. & L. E. R. R., supra, and cases there cited.
The judgment is affirmed.