Court Opinion

ID: 2756094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-27 16:04:27.722302+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:20.528927
License: Public Domain

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
                REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
                consistent with this order.

                                                                                    ,J.
                                                             Hardesty

                                                             Douglas

                CHERRY, J., concurring:
                            For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
                U.S. Bank, N.A.,   130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
                that respondent Deutsche Bank lost its lien priority by virtue of the
                homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
                however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
                concur in the disposition of this appeal.

                                                                                     J.

                cc:   Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
                      Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
                      Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
                      Kravitz, Schnitzer & Johnson, Chtd.
                      Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                      2
(0) 1947A