Court Opinion

ID: 4828596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-22 15:58:15.631833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:20.553758
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises a number of issues, all of which we affirm except as to the claim that his dual convictions for dealing in stolen property and grand theft (of $10,000 or more but less than $20,000) violate principles of double jeopardy. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (2014); Blackmon v. State, 121 So.3d 585, 547-49 (Fla.2013). We agree with Appellant, and remand with instructions to vacate the grand theft charge.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.