Court Opinion

ID: 989238
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:03:42.584911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:13.113062
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7928

MELVIN P. DEUTSCH,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED
STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-95-408-2)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin P. Deutsch, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th
Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and appellant

appealed. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Deutsch v. United States
Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-408-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1995) We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2