Court Opinion

ID: 988870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:59:00.813562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.883967
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 95-7658

JAMES THOL,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-95-76)

Submitted:    March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thol, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Thol v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-76 (E.D.
Va. Sept. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2