Court Opinion

ID: 6330186
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-12 22:30:25.05383+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:58.403994
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-86,421-04

                      EX PARTE JAMES MICHAEL RESER, Applicant

                ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
               CAUSE NO. 12-0702-K277D IN THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT
                          FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and unlawful restraint and sentenced to fifteen

and ten years’ imprisonment respectively. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Reser v. State, No. 03-15-00469-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 25, 2016)(not designated for

publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,

and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant has stated that he wishes to proceed with his four supplemental grounds filed by

habeas counsel. He alleges that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Applicant’s

mental health and for failing to call a material witness. He also alleges that the State misrepresented

evidence in its brief on direct appeal and suppressed evidence favorable and material to the defense.
        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims if he has not already done so. In developing the record, the

trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make claims

regarding whether or not the State engaged in misconduct or failed to disclose favorable and material

evidence. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in

response to Applicant’s claims. The trial court shall also forward to this Court the reporter’s records

of the hearings already held on this application on January 27 and February 14, 2022 where the trial

court heard witnesses related to the grounds raised in this application.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 6, 2022
Do not publish