Court Opinion

ID: 9577542
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:35:53.801056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:20:47.036300
License: Public Domain

DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J.
(,concurring). I agree with the majority in applying the public policy rationale to this case. However, my preference would have been to find that there was no credible evidence for a reasonable jury to find that Ann Tynan breached her duty with the facts in this record. See Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hosp., 99 Wis. 2d 708, 744, 301 N.W.2d 156 (1981).
I would, therefore, apply the rationale of McNeese v. Pier, 174 Wis. 2d 624, 632, 497 N.W.2d 124, 127 (1993) to this case.
*434I am authorized to state that Chief Justice Roland B. Day joins this concurring opinion.