Court Opinion

ID: 1003675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:29:56.38876+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:27.359350
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7139

CURTIS JAMES CHANCY,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL T. W. BELL,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-846-5)

Submitted:   February 6, 2001          Decided:     February 20, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis James Chancy, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Porter Babb, Sr.,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Curtis James Chancy appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Chancy v. Bell, No. CA-99-846-5 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3,

2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2