Court Opinion

ID: 1005237
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:53:38.998533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:29.776045
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DENNIS AINSWORTH MCCARTHY,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-98-26-R, CA-00-73-7)

Submitted:   August 23, 2001              Decided:   September 5, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Ainsworth McCarthy, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dennis Ainsworth McCarthy appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. McCarthy, Nos. CR-98-26-

R; CA-00-73-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2001).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2