Court Opinion

ID: 8082724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:02:19.716825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:25.084236
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Oliver, P. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Whistling balloons, rubber balloons, and noisemakers in part of bamboo like those the subject of Abstract 40493 at 45 percent under paragraph 409; (2) rubber mice in part of bamboo similar to those the subject of Abstract 40389 at 45 percent under paragraph 409; and (3) siren whistles similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397.