Court Opinion

ID: 905232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-21 20:35:59.310113+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:35.202721
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 21 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-10328

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02258-CKJ

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
MARIA ESTHER FIGUEROA-
SALINAS,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                    Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted June 18, 2013**

Before:        TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

       Maria Esther Figueroa-Salinas appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 40-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Figueroa-Salinas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Figueroa-Salinas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      The court is in receipt of Figueroa-Salinas’s letter dated May 30, 2013.

Insofar as the letter can be construed as a motion for substitute counsel, that motion

is denied.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    12-10328