Court Opinion

ID: 9828929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:51:58.12922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:54.981033
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.-
On considering the motion for a rehearing, we have concluded that we erred in holding, as a matter of law, that Noberta de Garza, under whom appellants claim, did not acquire title to the land in controversy, under and by virtue of the 10-year statute of limitation, prior to March 4, 1893. A more thorough consideration of the evidence upon this issue has satisfied us that it should have been submitted to the finding of the jury, and that the court erred in peremptorily instructing a verdict for the defendants. Wherefore, the motion is granted, the judgment of the district court reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.