Court Opinion

ID: 1003713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:30:35.590923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:27.648176
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Jamie Ray Everett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return
   
   *153
   
  of the appeal fee. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Everett v. Ray,
  
  No. CA-99-1882-13D (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.