Court Opinion

ID: 2850500
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 22:34:16.558802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:12:01.268563
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-06-025-CV

FORT WORTH & WESTERN	APPELLANTS

RAILROAD AND CEN-TEX RURAL

RAIL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

V.

PEREGRINE PIPELINE COMPANY, L.P.	APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 355
TH
 DISTRICT 
COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellants’ “Motion For Voluntary Dismissal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  
See
 T
EX.
 R. A
PP.
 P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED: March 16, 2006

FOOTNOTES
1:See
 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.