Court Opinion

ID: 9602464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:55:22.239252+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:03.844455
License: Public Domain

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice,
concurring in the result:
I am of the opinion that while the language of the statute is unartful, the legislative scheme for certifying psychologists can be ascertained. I do not, therefore, believe that A.R.S. §§ 32-2071 and 32-2072 are unconstitutionally vague and unconstitutionally delegate legislative authority nor that there is a denial of due process. Because the present action is mooted by repeal of the 1974 statutes, it is unnecessary to detail further my views as to the constitutionality of the former act.
I agree that since Cohen did not have a vested right in the legislative act existing at the time of his application for certification, this matter should be sent back so that he may re-apply pursuant to Ch. 99 of the 33rd Legislature, 1978 Regular Session, if he so desires.
I concur in the result only.