Court Opinion

ID: 598207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:22:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:56.494591
License: Public Domain

983 F.2d 1058
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ricky Lynn KEMPER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-7064.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  November 30, 1992Decided:  December 29, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge.  (CR-89-134, CA-92-1332)
Ricky Lynn Kemper, Appellant Pro Se.
Lisa M. Griffin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER,* Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Ricky Lynn Kemper appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Kemper, Nos.  CR-89-134, CA-92-1332 (D. Md. Sept. 10, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Judge Niemeyer did not participate in consideration of this case.  The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1988)