Court Opinion

ID: 13891
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 06:30:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:35.536837
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-10930
                           Summary Calendar

LARRY LEONARD HERRON,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

K.D. WITT,

                                          Defendant-Appellee.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:97-CV-363-Y
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                          January 16, 1998
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Texas state prisoner, Larry Leonard Herron, No. 453094,

appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action against Texas patrolman K.D. Witt.    The

district court dismissed Herron’s action without conducting a

Spears** hearing or providing Herron with a questionnaire.

     Herron’s allegation that Witt rammed the rear of Herron’s

vehicle could, through a Spears hearing or a questionnaire,

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
     **
          Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir. 1985).
                             No. 97-10930
                                  -2-

present a nonfrivolous § 1983 claim.     See Checki v. Webb, 785
F.2d 534, 538 (5th Cir. 1986)(officer’s intentional misuse of

vehicle could constitute a § 1983 claim).    The district court

therefore abused its discretion and prematurely dismissed

Herron’s complaint without affording him the opportunity to

develop his factual allegations.    See Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8,

9-10 (5th Cir. 1994).   The district court’s dismissal of Herron’s

complaint as frivolous is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for

further proceedings.

     We consider Herron’s Eighth Amendment claims dismissed by

the district court but not raised on appeal waived, and we refuse

to address his claims alleged for the first time to this court.

United States v. Valdiosera-Godinez, 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th

Cir. 1991); Gabel v. Lynbaugh, 835 F.2d 124, 125 (5th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, Herron’s motions to supplement his appeal with new

claims, to correct mistakes in the supplement, and to add new

evidence to the supplement are DENIED.

     VACATED and REMANDED.