Court Opinion

ID: 47317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:20:28+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:52.321997
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                     FILED
                      ________________________          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                          ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              March 28, 2006
                             No. 05-15532                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                         Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                       ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 05-00135-CR-CLS-RRA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

CHARLES EUGENE PRITCHETT,
a.k.a. Mookie,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Alabama
                      _________________________

                             (March 28, 2006)

Before BIRCH, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
      Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Charles Pritchett in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pritchett’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                          2