Court Opinion

ID: 6913075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:31:01.019415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:34.229219
License: Public Domain

O’CONNELL, C. J.,
specially concurring.
Although I do not understand how the court arrives at tbe conclusion that it is “fair” to require defendant to litigate in Oregon (see my dissent in State ex rel White Lbr. Co. v. Sulmonetti, 252 Or 121 at 128, 448 P2d 571 at 574 (1968)), there is as much reason to subject defendant to Oregon’s jurisdiction in this case as there was to subject the defendant to our jurisdiction in State ex rel White Lbr. Co. v. Sulmonetti, and on that ground I concur.