Court Opinion

ID: 2739270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-02 15:03:22.210891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:43.221318
License: Public Domain

Supreme Court of Florida
                                  ____________

                                  No. SC13-2381
                                  ____________

    IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL
       ADMINISTRATION; THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL
      PROCEDURE; AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE
         PROCEDURE—CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION RULES.

                                [July 3, 2014]
                            CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

      This matter is before the Court for consideration of amendments to the

Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, proposed by the Capital

Postconviction Proceedings Subcommittee of the Criminal Court Steering

Committee. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

      This Court has previously stated a specific goal that capital postconviction

proceedings in the trial court be concluded within two years from the filing of an

initial postconviction motion. See In re: Circuit Court Death Penalty

Postconviction Proceedings—Reporting and Processing Requirements, Fla.

Admin. Order No. AOSC11-32 (Sept. 14, 2011). Consistent with this objective,
the Capital Postconviction Proceedings Subcommittee undertook to determine the

causes of delay in existing capital postconviction procedures and recommend

solutions. Its proposed rule amendments in this case are intended to improve the

overall efficiency of the capital postconviction process through, among other

things, case management tools, new minimum qualifications for the lead attorney

representing a defendant in a capital postconviction case, a new requirement that

defendants in postconviction cases be represented by an attorney, and the

application of realistic, meaningful time frames and deadlines. The proposals are

also intended to encourage chief judges in each circuit, and trial judges assigned to

capital postconviction cases, to engage in proactive case management, and to

provide those judges with the tools to effectively manage capital cases.

                                 BACKGROUND

      In conjunction with the Florida Legislature’s enactment of the Timely

Justice Act during the 2013 legislative session, see ch. 2013-216, Laws of Fla., on

March 22, 2013, the Court established the Capital Postconviction Proceedings

Subcommittee (Subcommittee). See In re: Subcommittee on Capital

Postconviction Proceedings, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC13-11 (Mar. 22, 2013).

The Subcommittee was directed to “undertake a comprehensive review of capital

postconviction proceedings, including Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851,

and to make recommendations to the Court whether that rule, or any other rule,

                                        -2-
should be amended to improve the overall efficiency of the capital postconviction

process.” Id. at 1.

      Consistent with the Court’s direction, the Subcommittee has filed a petition

to amend six rules impacting capital postconviction cases. According to the

petition, the Subcommittee held several meetings and sought input from specific

stakeholders identified in AOSC13-11—the Criminal Court Steering Committee,

the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, the Office of Capital Collateral Regional

Counsel, and the Office of the Attorney General. The Subcommittee surveyed

twenty-six circuit court judges with significant experience in capital postconviction

cases. It also heard input from the Appellate Court Rules Committee, the Florida

Prosecuting Attorneys Association, the Florida Public Defender Association, the

Florida House of Representatives, the Governor’s Office, and the Clerk of the

Florida Supreme Court. The Subcommittee indicates that the overwhelming

consensus from these groups is that the existing rules governing the capital

postconviction process generally work well, and that a complete overhaul of those

rules is not necessary. It recommends amendments to six rules: Florida Rules of

Judicial Administration 2.215 (Trial Court Administration) and 2.535 (Court

Reporting); Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.112 (Minimum Standards for

Attorneys in Capital Cases), 3.851 (Collateral Relief After Death Sentence has

been Imposed and Affirmed on Direct Appeal), and 3.852 (Capital Postconviction

                                        -3-
Public Records Production); and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142

(Procedures for Review in Death Penalty Cases). The Subcommittee also proposes

four new case management orders to assist circuit court judges in managing capital

postconviction cases.

      After the Subcommittee filed its petition, the Court published the proposed

amendments for comment. The Court received comments from six groups: the

Florida Attorney General; the Criminal Law Section of The Florida Bar; the

Criminal Procedure Rules Committee; the Florida Prosecuting Attorneys

Association; Capital Collateral Regional Counsels for the Southern and Middle

Regions of Florida; and the Florida Public Defender Association. The

Subcommittee also received an additional comment from Judge Chris W.

Altenbernd, of the Second District Court of Appeal. The Subcommittee filed a

response addressing all seven comments; in some instances, the response includes

revised rule proposals.1 The Court heard oral argument on the proposed

amendments.

      We have considered the Subcommittee’s proposals and revised proposals,

the comments provided, and the issues raised at oral argument. As discussed in

      1. The Court also received a supplemental comment and a Notice of
Supplemental Authority from Capital Collateral Regional Counsel South. The
Subcommittee filed a response to the supplemental comment.

                                       -4-
this opinion, we defer to the expertise of the Subcommittee and adopt most of the

proposed amendments, with some modifications. However, we decline to adopt

the proposed amendment to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851(d)(2) (Time

Limitation). We discuss the more significant rule amendments below.

                                  AMENDMENTS

                  The Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

      First, Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215 (Trial Court Administration) is

amended to provide that the chief judge in a circuit shall monitor the status of all

postconviction or collateral relief proceedings for defendants sentenced to death,

beginning at the time this Court issues the mandate affirming the death sentence.

Additionally, capital postconviction cases are added to the list of “priority cases” in

subdivision (g) (Duty to Expedite Priority Cases) that should be expedited to the

extent reasonably possible.

      We also amend Rule of Judicial Administration 2.535 (Court Reporting), as

proposed, to prohibit the use of digital court reporting as the primary court

reporting system in trials where the state seeks the death penalty or in capital

postconviction proceedings. The Subcommittee indicates its goal is that the circuit

courts will use real-time transcription services to the extent possible.

                                         -5-
                    The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

      In the Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 3.112 (Minimum Standards for

Attorneys in Capital Cases), is amended to add new subdivision (k) (Qualifications

of Lead Counsel in Capital Postconviction Proceedings), which provides minimum

qualifications for the attorney serving as lead counsel for the defendant in a capital

postconviction case. Specifically, the lead attorney must have been a member of

any state Bar for at least five years, and must have at least three years of

experience with postconviction litigation. Additionally, the lead counsel must

have participated in a total of five proceedings in any of the following categories:

(a) capital trials; (b) capital sentencings; (c) capital postconviction evidentiary

hearings; (d) capital collateral postconviction appeals; or (e) capital federal habeas

corpus proceedings. At least two of the five proceedings must have been capital

postconviction evidentiary hearings or postconviction appeals, or federal habeas

proceedings.

      With regard to these new minimum qualifications, Capital Collateral

Regional Counsel urges the Court to require that the lead postconviction attorney

have experience in handling federal habeas petitions. While we share Capital

Collateral Regional Counsel’s concern that a significant number of attorneys in

Florida have apparently failed to meet federal filing deadlines in recent years, we

ultimately defer to the Subcommittee and adopt new subdivision (k) as proposed.

                                          -6-
We believe the Subcommittee’s proposal strikes the appropriate balance between

requiring that attorneys have relevant experience, and adopting qualifications

standards so stringent that it may prove difficult to find qualified lead counsel in

some circuits.

      We also note that the qualifications in rule 3.112(k) are intended to apply

only to the lead attorney handling a defendant’s postconviction case; attorneys that

do not meet the new requirements are still permitted to assist the lead attorney in

the representation. As provided in rule 3.112(c) (Applicability), the requirements

in new subdivision (k) will apply to attorneys who are appointed or retained on or

after April 1, 2015.

      Next, we make a number of amendments to Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.851 (Collateral Relief After Death Sentence has been Imposed and Affirmed on

Direct Appeal).

      First, and perhaps most significantly, we add new subdivision (b)(6)

(Appointment of Postconviction Counsel) to rule 3.851 to provide that a defendant

who has been sentenced to death may not represent himself or herself in a capital

postconviction case in state court; he or she must be represented by an attorney.

Indeed, the only basis on which a defendant may seek to dismiss counsel is

pursuant to statute due to an actual conflict, or pursuant to rule 3.851(i) (Dismissal

of Postconviction Proceedings). A defendant sentenced to death does not have a

                                         -7-
right to self-representation on direct appeal under either the United States or

Florida Constitutions, and we have previously held that we will not accept pro se

filings in direct appeals in capital cases. See Davis v. State, 789 So. 2d 978,

980-81 (Fla. 2001); see also Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., 528 U.S. 152

(2000). We have also held that defendants sentenced to death may not appear pro

se in any postconviction appeals. See Gordon v. State, 75 So. 3d 200, 202 (Fla.

2011). In adopting the Subcommittee’s proposal, we now extend the prohibition

against self-representation to include postconviction proceedings in the trial court.

We agree with the Subcommittee that this change is consistent with our

overarching goal to provide a fair and reliable postconviction process. As we

stated in Gordon, “[w]e recognize that ‘we have a constitutional responsibility to

ensure the death penalty is administered in a fair, consistent and reliable manner, as

well as having an administrative responsibility to work to minimize the delays

inherent in the postconviction process’ ” and we believe these principles are best

served when defendants in postconviction proceedings are represented by counsel.

Id. (citing Arbelaez v. Butterworth, 738 So. 2d 326, 326-27 (Fla. 1999)). This new

provision shall apply to all postconviction motions filed on or after January 1,

2015.

        Next, subdivision (c)(1) (Preliminary Procedures; Judicial Assignment and

Responsibilities) of rule 3.851 is amended to provide that the judge assigned to a

                                         -8-
capital postconviction case is responsible for case management in order to ensure

compliance with statutes, rules, and administrative orders that impose processing

steps, time deadlines, and reporting requirements. Beginning from the time of the

assignment, the judge must issue case management orders for every step of the

capital postconviction process. We also amend subdivision (c)(4) (Preliminary

Procedures; Duties of Defense Counsel) to require a defendant’s trial attorney to

provide postconviction counsel with a copy of his or her original file, including all

work product not otherwise subject to a protective order and all information

pertaining to the case that was created and obtained during the representation. As

we stated in Long v. Dillinger, 701 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 1997), an attorney’s

original file is the property of the attorney, and the attorney is not required to

surrender the original file to collateral counsel. However, collateral counsel is

permitted to view and inspect the trial attorney’s entire original file, and may

obtain a copy of the file, at collateral counsel’s expense.

      In subdivision (d)(2) (Time Limitation) of rule 3.851, the Subcommittee

proposed new time limits to bring successive postconviction motions alleging

newly discovered evidence or claims involving retroactive application of a newly

announced rule of constitutional law. Currently, our case law provides that

successive postconviction motions alleging newly discovered evidence must be

filed within one year after the new facts were discovered. See, e.g., Jimenez v.

                                          -9-
State, 997 So. 2d 1056, 1064 (Fla. 2008) (“To be considered timely filed as newly

discovered evidence, the successive rule 3.851 motion was required to have been

filed within one year of the date upon which the claim became discoverable

through due diligence.”). The Subcommittee’s revised proposal would require that

these claims be raised within 180 days; it would also require that claims based on a

new fundamental constitutional right must be brought within 180 days after

issuance of the mandate of the decision announcing retroactivity. Capital

Collateral Regional Counsel objects to the new time frames, arguing that the time

limits are too restrictive and will place a significant strain on their resources.

Based on these comments, and the discussion at oral argument, we decline to adopt

the Subcommittee’s new time frames in subdivision (d)(2).

      Subdivision (e) (Contents of Motion) of rule 3.851 is amended to provide

new requirements for organizing an initial postconviction motion. We have

modified the Subcommittee’s revised proposal to provide that each claim or

subclaim in the motion shall be separately pled and sequentially numbered. Also

in subdivision (e), we eliminate the requirement that capital postconviction

motions be filed under oath. The rule now requires that the postconviction motion

contain a certification from the attorney filing it that he or she discussed the

contents of the motion fully with the defendant, that the attorney has complied with

                                         - 10 -
Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.4,2 and that the motion is filed in good faith.

We agree with the Subcommittee that this provision should be sufficient to ensure

that postconviction motions will be presented in good faith, and contain no

frivolous or meritless claims.

      Next, we amend subdivision (f) (Procedure; Evidentiary Hearing;

Disposition) of rule 3.851 to: require that a motion to amend a postconviction

motion must be filed at least forty-five days before the evidentiary hearing; provide

that the trial judge shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on a successive

postconviction motion within ninety days (rather than sixty days) after a case

management conference; authorize the trial court to take witness testimony at the

hearing by “contemporaneous video communication equipment,” with or without

the consent of any party; and direct that the transcripts of the evidentiary hearing

shall be filed within ten days if real-time transcription was used, or forty-five days

if real-time transcription was not used. We also amend subdivision (f) to authorize

the trial court to accept written closing arguments from the parties. The written

       2. Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.4 requires a lawyer to promptly
inform the client of any decision or circumstance that requires the client’s
informed consent; to reasonably consult with the client about how to accomplish
the client’s objectives; to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of
the case; to promptly comply with the client’s reasonable requests for information;
to consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct;
and to explain a matter to the client to the extent necessary to permit the client to
make informed decisions.

                                        - 11 -
arguments must be filed by both parties within thirty days of the filing of the

transcript, they shall conform to the requirements for a brief, they shall not exceed

sixty pages in length without leave from the trial court, and they shall include

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. If the trial court does permit

written closing arguments, it shall render its final order within thirty days after the

filing of the last written closing argument, and no later than sixty days from the

filing of the transcript; if the court does not permit written closing arguments, the

final order shall be rendered within thirty days after the filing of the transcript.

Subdivision (f) is further amended to require that all expert witnesses who will

testify at the evidentiary hearing must submit written reports that will be disclosed

to opposing counsel. Additionally, the subdivision is amended to provide that the

trial court shall enter an order on any motion for rehearing within thirty days

(rather than fifteen days); if the court does not render an order on rehearing in

thirty days, the motion is deemed denied.

      Lastly in rule 3.851, we add a new subdivision (j) (Attorney General

Notification to Clerk), which requires the Attorney General to notify the Clerk of

this Court when it believes a defendant has completed his or her direct appeal,

initial postconviction proceedings in state court, and habeas corpus proceedings

and appeal in federal court, and to serve a copy of the notification on the

                                         - 12 -
defendant’s counsel. This new rule is intended to assist the Clerk of this Court in

complying with section 922.052, Florida Statutes (2013).3

      Turning next to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.852 (Capital Postconviction

Public Records Production), we amend the rule as proposed by the Subcommittee,

with some modifications, in an effort to streamline the public records production

process. In subdivision (d) (Action Upon Issuance of Mandate), we have revised

the Subcommittee’s proposed amendment to provide that the Attorney General

shall make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production of public records.

Similarly, we have revised the Subcommittee’s proposal in subdivision (e) (Action

Upon Receipt of Notice of Mandate) to require the state attorney to make a good

faith effort to assist in the timely production of public records.

      Also in rule 3.852, new subdivision (f)(3) (Exempt or Confidential Public

Records) requires collateral counsel to file a motion for an in camera inspection of

sealed records within thirty days after receiving notice of delivery of the records to

the central records repository. If the motion is not timely filed, the in camera

inspection will be deemed waived. We also amend subdivision (g) (Demand for

      3. In the Timely Justice Act, the Florida Legislature amended section
922.052, Florida Statutes, to require the Clerk of this Court to inform the Governor
when a person convicted and sentenced to death has completed his or her direct
appeal and initial postconviction proceedings in state court, as well as his or her
habeas corpus proceedings and appeal in federal court. See Ch. 2013-216, § 12,
Laws of Fla.

                                         - 13 -
Additional Public Records) to provide that the trial court shall hear and rule on any

objection to a demand for additional public records no later than the next ninety-

day status conference.

                    The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

      We amend Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142(a)(1)(B) (Procedures

for Review in Death Penalty Cases; Procedure in Death Penalty Appeals; Record)

to provide that the clerk of the trial court shall retain a copy of the complete record

when it transmits the record to this Court on appeal.

                             Case Management Orders

      As noted, the Subcommittee also proposes four new form case management

orders. Each of the four orders outlines the responsibilities of the relevant

participants and the actions each is required to take. The first order is to be used

following the chief judge’s assignment of a trial judge to preside in a capital

postconviction proceeding; the second order would be used following the United

States Supreme Court’s disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari, or after

expiration of the time to file a certiorari petition; the third order is designed for use

after the defendant files his or her initial postconviction motion; and the fourth

order is to be used following the case management conference. While we

authorize these four form orders for use, we express no opinion as to their

correctness. The Subcommittee indicates that the orders will be posted to the

                                         - 14 -
Court’s Educational Resources for Judges and Lawyers website, and distributed to

judges at the annual “Handling Capital Cases” course and refresher course.

                                  CONCLUSION

      We wish to thank the Subcommittee for its diligent and thorough work to

improve the quality and efficiency of the capital postconviction process in this

state. We also thank those who submitted comments in this matter for their

valuable input. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge the excellent work of

the trial courts, which have taken steps to ensure that capital postconviction cases

are timely processed, consistent with the goals stated in In re Circuit Court Death

Penalty Postconviction Proceedings—Reporting and Processing Requirements,

Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC11-32.

      Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by

underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments

shall become effective on January 1, 2015, at 12:01 a.m., except that the new

minimum qualifications in Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.112(k) will apply to

attorneys appointed or retained on or after April 1, 2015.

      It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., concurs with an opinion.

                                        - 15 -
CANADY, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion in which
POLSTON, J., concurs.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

LEWIS, J., concurring.

      I agree with the adoption of these rules, but I continue to have multiple

concerns. First, we must be vigilant to make certain that qualified postconviction

counsel is both available and engaged in this process as the system moves forward.

The process must be effectively monitored for the proper functioning of the

process guided by counsel.

      Second, the entire judicial system seems somewhat uncertain with regard to

court reporting because within the last few years, we have attempted to manipulate

the type of court reporting among different approaches. From time to time, it

seems, types and models of court reporting move to and from favor to disfavor.

Employee models, independent contractor models, digital, computerized, real-time

and otherwise seem to flow into and out of favor. We must have a solid court

reporting system to support a level of comfort with the entire criminal justice

process.

      Finally, I continue to believe that we can only overcome unconscionable and

unacceptable systemic delays that undermine justice if we begin the discussion and

analysis as to the proper roles of the respective State Attorney offices for the direct

                                         - 16 -
trial proceedings, and the Attorney General offices for postconviction collateral

review proceedings. As in civil litigation, we have clearly understood and placed

the burden of moving cases forward to justice on the shoulders of the party

prosecuting the action so there must be some proper responsibility on the shoulders

of the State in this area as the party ultimately responsible for prosecution of the

underlying action.

CANADY, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

      I would not adopt the amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.851(b)(6) prohibiting defendants in capital postconviction proceedings from

representing themselves. I would, however, adopt the proposed amendment to

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851(d)(2) imposing a time limitation of 180

days with respect to the filing of successive capital postconviction motions alleging

newly discovered evidence or seeking retroactive application of the newly

announced rule of constitutional law. Otherwise, I concur with the majority’s

decision.

POLSTON, J., concurs.

Original Proceedings – Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of
Criminal Procedure and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Kevin Emas, Judge, Third District Court of Appeal, Chair, Criminal Court Steering
Committee, Miami, Florida, and Bart Schneider, Office of the State Courts
Administrator, General Counsel’s Office, Tallahassee, Florida,

      for Petitioner

                                        - 17 -
Julianne M. Holt, President, Florida Public Defender Association, Public Defender,
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Tampa, Florida; Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender,
and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit,
Miami, Florida; Susan Odzer Hugentugler, Chair, The Florida Bar Criminal Law
Section, Office of the State Attorney, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; James Vincent
Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-Middle, Tampa, Florida, and
Neal Andre Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-South, and Suzanne
Myers Keffer, Chief Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-South, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida; Arthur Ivan Jacobs and Tyler Stubbs of Jacobs, Scholz &
Associates, LLC, Fernandina Beach, Florida, on behalf of the Florida Prosecuting
Attorneys Association; Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Carolyn Marie
Snurkowski, Associate Deputy Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and
Katherine Maria Diamandis, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, on
behalf of the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General; Melanie L. Casper,
Chair, Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, West Palm Beach, Florida, and John
F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Heather Savage Telfer, Staff Liaison, The
Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

      Responding with comments

                                      - 18 -
                                    APPENDIX

        THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

RULE 2.215.         TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION

      (a)    [No change]

      (b)    Chief Judge.

             (1) – (6)    [No change]

              (7) The chief judge shall regulate the use of all court facilities,
regularly examine the dockets of the courts under the chief judge’s administrative
supervision, and require a report on the status of the matters on the dockets. The
chief judge may take such action as may be necessary to cause the dockets to be
made current. The chief judge shall monitor the status of all pending
postconviction or collateral relief proceedings brought byfor defendants who have
been sentenced to death from the time that the mandate affirming the death
sentence has been issued by the supreme court and shall take the necessary actions
to assure that such cases proceed without undue delay. On the first day of every
January, April, July, and October, the chief judge shall inform the chief justice of
the supreme court of the status of all such pending cases.

             (8) – (13)   [No change]

      (c) – (f)     [No change]

       (g) Duty to Expedite Priority Cases. Every judge has a duty to expedite
priority cases to the extent reasonably possible. Priority cases are those cases that
have been assigned a priority status or assigned an expedited disposition schedule
by statute, rule of procedure, case law, or otherwise. Particular attention shall be
given to all juvenile dependency and termination of parental rights cases, cases
involving families and children in need of services, and challenges involving
elections and proposed constitutional amendments, and capital postconviction
cases. As part of an effort to make capital postconviction cases a priority, the chief
judge shall have the discretion to create a postconviction division to handle capital

                                        - 19 -
postconviction, as well as non-capital postconviction cases, and may assign one or
more judges to that division.

      (h) – (i)    [No change]

                                 Committee Notes

                                    [No change]

                               Court Commentary

                                    [No change]

                   Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

       2014 Amendment. Capital postconviction cases were added to the list of
priority cases.

RULE 2.535.        COURT REPORTING

      (a) – (h)    [No change]

       (i)    Court Reporting Services in Capital Cases. The chief judge, after
consultation with the circuit court judges in the circuit, shall enter an
administrative order developing and implementing a circuit-wide plan for court
reporting in all trials in which the state seeks the death penalty and in capital
postconviction proceedings. The plan shall prohibit the use of digital court
reporting as the primary court reporting system and shall require the use of all
measures necessary to expedite the preparation of the transcript, including but not
limited to:

             (1) where available, the use of an approved court reporter who has
the capacity to provide real-time transcription of the proceedings;

            (2) if real-time transcription services are not available, the use of a
computer-aided transcription qualified court reporter;

                                       - 20 -
            (3) the use of scopists, text editors, alternating court reporters, or
other means to expedite the finalization of the certified transcript; and

             (4) the imposition of reasonable restrictions on work assignments
by employee or contract approved court reporters to ensure that transcript
production in capital cases is given a priority.

      (j)    [No change]

                                   Committee Note

                                     [No change]

            THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

RULE 3.112.         MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEYS IN
                    CAPITAL CASES

      (a) – (b)     [No change]

       (c) Applicability. This rule applies to all defense counsel handling
capital trials and capital appeals, who are appointed or retained on or after July 1,
2002. Subdivision (k) of this rule applies to all lead counsel handling capital
postconviction cases, who are appointed or retained on or after April 1, 2015.

      (d) – (e)     [No change]

       (f)   Lead Trial Counsel. Lead trial counsel assignments should be given
to attorneys who:

             (1) are members of the bar admitted to practice in the jurisdiction or
admitted to practice pro hac vice; and

              (2) are experienced and active trial practitioners with at least five
years of litigation experience in the field of criminal law; and

              (3) have prior experience as lead counsel in no fewer than nine state
or federal jury trials of serious and complex cases which were tried to completion,

                                         - 21 -
as well as prior experience as lead defense counsel or cocounsel in at least two
state or federal cases tried to completion in which the death penalty was sought. In
addition, of the nine jury trials which were tried to completion, the attorney should
have been lead counsel in at least three cases in which the charge was murder; or
alternatively, of the nine jury trials, at least one was a murder trial and an
additional five were felony jury trials; and

              (4) are familiar with the practice and procedure of the criminal courts
of the jurisdiction; and

            (5) are familiar with and experienced in the utilization of expert
witnesses and evidence, including but not limited to psychiatric and forensic
evidence; and

             (6) have demonstrated the necessary proficiency and commitment
which exemplify the quality of representation appropriate to capital cases,
including but not limited to the investigation and presentation of evidence in
mitigation of the death penalty; and

             (7) have attended within the last two years a continuing legal
education program of at least twelve hours’ duration devoted specifically to the
defense of capital cases.

      (g) – (j)     [No change]

      (k) Qualifications of Lead Counsel in Capital Postconviction
Proceedings. In order to serve as lead counsel, as set forth in rule 3.851, for the
defendant in a capital postconviction proceeding, an attorney shall have:

             (1)    been a member of any bar for at least 5 years; and

              (2)   at least 3 years of experience in the field of postconviction
litigation; and

             (3) prior participation in a combined total of 5 proceedings in any
of the following areas, at least 2 of which shall be from subdivision (k)(3)(C),
(k)(3)(D), or (k)(3)(E) below:

                    (A)   capital trials;

                                            - 22 -
                    (B)   capital sentencings;

                    (C)   capital postconviction evidentiary hearings;

                    (D)   capital collateral postconviction appeals;

                    (E)   capital federal habeas proceedings.

       (kl) Exceptional Circumstances. In the event that the trial court
determines that exceptional circumstances require appointment of counsel not
meeting the requirements of this rule, the trial court shall enter an order specifying,
in writing, the exceptional circumstances requiring deviation from the rule and the
court’s explicit determination that counsel chosen will provide competent
representation in accord with the policy concerns of the rule.

                               Committee Comments

                                     [No change]

                    Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

       2014 Amendment. The Steering Committee added minimum requirements
for lead counsel in capital postconviction proceedings to ensure a requisite level of
expertise in capital postconviction cases and to permit the State the opportunity to
seek opt-in treatment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2261-2266.

RULE 3.851.         COLLATERAL RELIEF AFTER DEATH SENTENCE
                    HAS BEEN IMPOSED AND AFFIRMED ON DIRECT
                    APPEAL

       (a) Scope. This rule shall apply to all postconviction proceedings that
commence upon issuance of the appellate mandate affirming the death sentence to
include all motions and petitions for any type of postconviction or collateral relief
brought by a prisonerdefendant in state custody who has been sentenced to death
and whose conviction and death sentence have been affirmed on direct appeal. It
shall apply to all postconviction motions filed on or after October 1, 2001January
1, 2015, by prisonersdefendants who are under sentence of death. Motions pending

                                        - 23 -
on that date are governed by the version of this rule in effect immediately prior to
that date.

      (b)    Appointment of Postconviction Counsel.

             (1)   [No Change]

             (2) Within 30 days of the issuance of the mandate, the Capital
Collateral Regional Counsel or Registry Counsel shall file either a notice of
appearance in the trial court or a motion to withdraw based on a conflict of interest
or some other legal groundin the trial court. Motions to withdraw filed more than
30 days after the issuance of the mandate shall not be entertained unless based on a
specific conflict of interest as set forth in section 27.703, Florida Statutes.

             (3)   [No Change]

             (4) In every capital postconviction case, one lawyer shall be
designated as lead counsel for the defendant. The lead counsel shall be the
defendant’s primary lawyer in all state court litigation. No lead counsel shall be
permitted to appear for a limited purpose on behalf of a defendant in a capital
postconviction proceeding.

             (5) After the filing of a notice of appearance, Capital Collateral
Regional Counsel, Registry Counsel, or a private attorney shall represent the
defendant in the state courts until a judge allows withdrawal or until the sentence is
reversed, reduced, or carried out, regardless of whether another attorney represents
the defendant in a federal court.

             (6) A defendant who has been sentenced to death may not represent
himself or herself in a capital postconviction proceeding in state court. The only
bases for a defendant to seek to dismiss postconviction counsel in state court shall
be pursuant to statute due to actual conflict or subdivision (i) of this rule.

      (c)    Preliminary Procedures.

             (1) Judicial Assignment and Responsibilities. Within 30 days of
the issuance of mandate affirming a judgment and sentence of death on direct
appeal, the chief judge shall assign the case to a judge qualified under the Rules of
Judicial Administration to conduct capital proceedings. The assigned judge is
responsible for case management to ensure compliance with statutes, rules, and

                                        - 24 -
administrative orders that impose processing steps, time deadlines, and reporting
requirements for capital postconviction litigation. From the time of assignment, the
judge must issue case management orders for every step of the capital
postconviction process, including at the conclusion of all hearings and conferences.

             (2)   [No Change]

             (3) Prisoner’sDefendant’s Presence Not Required. The
prisoner’sdefendant’s presence shall not be required at any hearing or conference
held under this rule, except at the evidentiary hearing on the merits of any claim
and at any hearing involving conflict with or removal of collateral counsel.

             (4) Duties of Defense Counsel. Within 45 days of appointment of
postconviction counsel, the defendant’s trial counsel shall provide to
postconviction counsel a copy of the original file including all work product not
otherwise subject to a protective order and all information pertaining to the
defendant’s capital case which was created and obtained during the representation
of the defendant. Postconviction counsel shall maintain the confidentiality of all
confidential information received. Postconviction counsel shall bear the costs of
any copying. The defendant’s trial counsel must retain the defendant’s original file.

             (5) Record on Direct Appeal. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall
retain a copy of the record for the direct appeal when the record is transmitted to
the Supreme Court of Florida. The Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida shall
promptly deliver the record on appeal to the records repository within 30 days after
the appointment of postconviction counsel.

      (d)    Time Limitation.

             (1) Any motion to vacate judgment of conviction and sentence of
death shall be filed by the prisonerdefendant within 1 year after the judgment and
sentence become final. For the purposes of this rule, a judgment is final:

                    (A) on the expiration of the time permitted to file in the
United States Supreme Court a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the
Supreme Court of Florida decision affirming a judgment and sentence of death (90
days after the opinion becomes final); or

                   (B) on the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari by
the United States Supreme Court, if filed.

                                       - 25 -
             (2)   [No Change]

             (3) All petitions for extraordinary relief in which the Supreme
Court of Florida has original jurisdiction, including petitions for writs of habeas
corpus, shall be filed simultaneously with the initial brief filed on behalf of the
death-sentenced prisonerdefendant in the appeal of the circuit court’s order on the
initial motion for postconviction relief filed under this rule.

              (4) The time limitation in subdivision (d)(1) is established with the
understanding that each death-sentenced prisoner will have counsel assigned and
available to begin addressing the prisoner’s postconviction issues within the time
specified in this rule. ShouldIf the governor signs a death warrant before the
expiration of the time limitation in subdivision (d)(1), the Supreme Court of
Florida, on a defendant’s request, will grant a stay of execution to allow any
postconviction relief motions to proceed in a timely and orderly manner.
Furthermore, this time limitation shall not preclude the right to amend or to
supplement pending pleadings under these rules.

              (5) An extension of time may be granted by the Supreme Court of
Florida for the filing of postconviction pleadings if the prisoner’sdefendant’s
counsel makes a showing of good cause for counsel’s inabilitythat due to
exceptional circumstances, counsel was unable to file the postconviction pleadings
within the 1-year period established by this rule.

      (e)    Contents of Motion.

               (1) Initial Motion. A motion filed under this rule is an initial
postconviction motion if no state court has previously ruled on a postconviction
motion challenging the same judgment and sentence. An initial motion and
memorandum of law filed under this rule shall not exceed 75 pages exclusive of
the attachments. Each claim or subclaim shall be separately pled and shall be
sequentially numbered beginning with claim number 1. If upon motion or upon the
court’s own motion, a judge determines that this portion of the rule has not been
followed, the judge shall give the movant 30 days to amend. If no amended motion
is filed, the judge shall deem the non-compliant claim, subclaim, and/or argument
waived. Attachments shall include, but are not limited to, the judgment and
sentence. The memorandum of law shall set forth the applicable case law
supporting the granting of relief as to each separately pled claim. This rule does not
authorize relief based upon claims that could have or should have been raised at

                                        - 26 -
trial and, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence. If
claims that were raised on appeal or should have or could have been raised on
appeal are contained in the motion, the memorandum of law shall contain a brief
statement explaining why these claims are being raised on postconviction relief.
The motion shall be under oath and need not be under oath or signed by the
defendant but shall include:

                   (A) a description of the judgment and sentence under attack
and the name of the court that rendered the same;

                    (B)    a statement of each issue raised on appeal and the
disposition thereof;

                    (C)    the nature of the relief sought;

                  (D) a detailed allegation of the factual basis for any claim for
which an evidentiary hearing is sought; and

                    (E) a detailed allegation as to the basis for any purely legal or
constitutional claim for which an evidentiary hearing is not required and the reason
that this claim could not have been or was not raised on direct appeal; and.

                    (F) a certification from the attorney that he or she has
discussed the contents of the motion fully with the defendant, that he or she has
complied with Rule 4-1.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and that the
motion is filed in good faith.

               (2) Successive Motion. A motion filed under this rule is successive
if a state court has previously ruled on a postconviction motion challenging the
same judgment and sentence. A claim raised in a successive motion shall be
dismissed if the trial court finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for
relief and the prior determination was on the merits; or, if new and different
grounds are alleged, the trial court finds that the failure to assert those grounds in a
prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure; or, if the trial court finds there
was no good cause for failing to assert those grounds in a prior motion; or, if the
trial court finds the claim fails to meet the time limitation exceptions set forth in
subdivision (d)(2)(A), (d)(2)(B), or (d)(2)(C).

            A successive motion shall not exceed 25 pages, exclusive of
attachments, and shall include:

                                         - 27 -
                   (A) – (B)     [No Change]

                   (C) if based upon newly discovered evidence, Brady v.
Maryland Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), or Giglio v. United States
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), the following:

                         (i)    the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all
witnesses supporting the claim;

                          (ii) a statement that the witness will be available,
should an evidentiary hearing be scheduled, to testify under oath to the facts
alleged in the motion or affidavit;

                         (iii) if evidentiary support is in the form of documents,
copies of all documents shall be attached, including any affidavits obtained; and

                         (iv) as to any witness or document listed in the motion
or attachment to the motion, a statement of the reason why the witness or
document was not previously available.

      (f)    Procedure; Evidentiary Hearing; Disposition.

             (1) – (2)    [No Change]

             (3)   Answer.

                      (A) Answer to the Initial Motion. Within 60 days of the
filing of an initial motion, the state shall file its answer. The answer and
accompanying memorandum of law shall not exceed 75 pages, exclusive of
attachments and exhibits. The answer shall address the legal insufficiency of any
claim in the motion, respond to the allegations of the motion, and address any
procedural bars. The answer shall use the same claim numbering system contained
in the defendant’s initial motion. As to any claims of legal insufficiency or
procedural bar, the state shall include a short statement of any applicable case law.

                    (B) Answer to a Successive Motion. Within 20 days of the
filing of a successive motion, the state shall file its answer. The answer shall not
exceed 25 pages, exclusive of attachments and exhibits. The answer shall use the
same claim numbering system contained in the defendant’s motion. The answer

                                        - 28 -
shall specifically respond to each claim in the motion and state the reason(s) that
an evidentiary hearing is or is not required.

               (4) Amendments. A motion filed under this rule may not be
amended up to 30 days prior to the evidentiary hearing upon motion and unless
good cause is shown. The trial court may in its discretion grant a motion to amend
provided that the motion sets forth the reason the claim was not raised earlier and
attaches a A copy of the claim sought to be added must be attached to the motion
to amend. The trial court may in its discretion grant a motion to amend provided
that the motion to amend was filed at least 45 days before the scheduled
evidentiary hearing. Granting a motion under this subdivision shall not be a basis
for granting a continuance of the evidentiary hearing unless a manifest injustice
would occur if a continuance was not granted. If amendment is allowed, the state
shall file an amended answer within 20 days after the amended motion is filed
judge allows the motion to be amended.

             (5)   Case Management Conference; Evidentiary Hearing.

                   (A)    [No Change]

                      (B) Successive Postconviction Motion. Within 30 days after
the state files its answer to a successive motion for postconviction relief, the trial
court shall hold a case management conference. At the case management
conference, the trial court also shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing
should be held and hear argument on any purely legal claims not based on disputed
facts. If the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the
movant is entitled to no relief, the motion may be denied without an evidentiary
hearing. If the trial court determines that an evidentiary hearing should be held, the
court shall schedule the hearing to be held within 6090 days. If a death warrant has
been signed, the trial court shall expedite these time periods in accordance with
subdivision (h) of this rule.

                   (C)    [No Change]

                     (D) Taking Testimony. Upon motion, or upon its own
motion and without the consent of any party, the court may permit a witness to
testify at the evidentiary hearing by contemporaneous video communication
equipment that makes the witness visible to all parties during the testimony. There
must be appropriate safeguards for the court to maintain sufficient control over the
equipment and the transmission of the testimony so the court may stop the

                                        - 29 -
communication to accommodate objections or prevent prejudice. If testimony is
taken through video communication equipment, there must be a notary public or
other person authorized to administer oaths in the witness’s jurisdiction who is
present with the witness and who administers the oath consistent with the laws of
the jurisdiction where the witness is located. The cost for the use of video
communication equipment is the responsibility of either the requesting party or, if
upon its own motion, the court.

                     (DE) Procedures After Evidentiary Hearing. Immediately
following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court shall order a transcript of the
hearing, which shall be filed within 30 days. Within 30 days of receipt of the
transcript, the court shall render its order, ruling on each claim considered at the
evidentiary hearing and all other claims raised in the motion, making detailed
findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to each claim, and attaching or
referencing such portions of the record as are necessary to allow for meaningful
appellate review. The order issued after the evidentiary hearing shall resolve all the
claims raised in the motion and shall be considered the final order for purposes of
appeal. The clerk of the trial court shall promptly serve upon the parties and the
attorney general a copy of the final order, with a certificate of service.10 days if
real-time transcription was utilized, or within 45 days if real-time transcription was
not utilized. The trial judge may permit written closing arguments instead of oral
closing arguments. If the trial court permits the parties to submit written closing
arguments, the arguments shall be filed by both parties within 30 days of the filing
of the transcript of the hearing. No answer or reply arguments shall be allowed.
Written arguments shall be in compliance with the requirements for briefs in rule
9.210(a)(1) and (a)(2), shall not exceed 60 pages without leave of court, and shall
include proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law, with citations to
authority and to appropriate portions of the transcript of the hearing.

                     (F) Rendition of the Order. If the court does not permit
written closing arguments, the court shall render its order within 30 days of the
filing of the transcript of the hearing. If the court permits written closing
arguments, the court shall render its order within 30 days of the filing of the last
written closing argument and no later than 60 days from the filing of the transcript
of the hearing. The court shall rule on each claim considered at the evidentiary
hearing and all other claims raised in the motion, making detailed findings of fact
and conclusions of law with respect to each claim, and attaching or referencing
such portions of the record as are necessary to allow for meaningful appellate
review. The order issued after the evidentiary hearing shall resolve all the claims
raised in the motion and shall be considered the final order for purposes of appeal.

                                        - 30 -
The clerk of the trial court shall promptly serve upon the parties and the attorney
general a copy of the final order, with a certificate of service.

              (6) Mental Health Experts and Other Witnesses. All expert
witnesses who will testify at the evidentiary hearing must submit written reports,
which shall be disclosed to opposing counsel as provided in subdivision (f)(5)(A).
If the defendant intends to offer expert testimony of his or her mental status, the
state shall be entitled to have the defendant examined by its own mental health
expert. If the defendant fails to cooperate with the state’s expert, the trial court
may, in its discretion, proceed as provided in rule 3.202(e). Reports provided to
either party by an expert witness shall be disclosed to opposing counsel upon
receipt.

              (7) Rehearing. Motions for rehearing shall be filed within 15 days
of the rendition of the trial court’s order and a response thereto filed within 10 days
thereafter. A motion for rehearing shall be based on a good faith belief that the
court has overlooked a previously argued issue of fact or law or an argument based
on a legal precedent or statute not available prior to the court’s ruling. The trial
court’s order disposing of the motion for rehearing shall be rendered not later than
1530 days thereafterfrom the filing of the motion for rehearing. If no order is filed
within 30 days from the filing of the motion for rehearing, the motion is deemed
denied. A motion for rehearing is not required to preserve any issue for review.

             (8) Appeals. Any party may appeal a final order entered on a
defendant’s motion for rule 3.851 relief by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk
of the lower tribunal within 30 days of the rendition of the order to be reviewed.
Pursuant to the procedures outlined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142,
a prisonerdefendant under sentence of death may petition for a belated appeal.

      (g)    Incompetence to Proceed in Capital Collateral Proceedings.

               (1) A death-sentenced prisonerdefendant pursuing collateral relief
under this rule who is found by the court to be mentally incompetent shall not be
proceeded against if there are factual matters at issue, the development or
resolution of which require the prisoner’sdefendant’s input. However, all collateral
relief issues that involve only matters of record and claims that do not require the
prisoner’sdefendant’s input shall proceed in collateral proceedings notwithstanding
the prisoner’sdefendant’s incompetency.

                                        - 31 -
              (2) Collateral counsel may file a motion for competency
determination and an accompanying certificate of counsel that the motion is made
in good faith and on reasonable grounds to believe that the death-sentenced
prisonerdefendant is incompetent to proceed. The motion and certificate shall
replace the signed oath by the prisonerdefendant that otherwise must accompany a
motion filed under this rule.

              (3) If, at any stage of a postconviction proceeding, the court
determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a death-sentenced
prisonerdefendant is incompetent to proceed and that factual matters are at issue,
the development or resolution of which require the prisoner’sdefendant’s input, a
judicial determination of incompetency is required.

              (4) The motion for competency examination shall be in writing and
shall allege with specificity the factual matters at issue and the reason that
competent consultation with the prisonerdefendant is necessary with respect to
each factual matter specified. To the extent that it does not invade the lawyer-client
privilege with collateral counsel, the motion shall contain a recital of the specific
observations of, and conversations with, the death-sentenced prisonerdefendant
that have formed the basis of the motion.

              (5) If the court finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe
that a death-sentenced prisonerdefendant is incompetent to proceed in a
postconviction proceeding in which factual matters are at issue, the development or
resolution of which require the prisoner’sdefendant’s input, the court shall order
the prisonerdefendant examined by no more than 3, nor fewer than 2, experts
before setting the matter for a hearing. The court may seek input from the death-
sentenced prisoner’sdefendant’s counsel and the state attorney before appointment
of the experts.

             (6)    [No Change]

             (7) Counsel for both the death-sentenced prisonerdefendant and the
state may be present at the examination, which shall be conducted at a date and
time convenient for all parties and the Department of Corrections.

             (8) On appointment by the court, the experts shall examine the
death-sentenced prisonerdefendant with respect to the issue of competence to
proceed, as specified by the court in its order appointing the experts to evaluate the
prisonerdefendant, and shall evaluate the prisonerdefendant as ordered.

                                        - 32 -
                     (A) The experts first shall consider factors related to the issue
of whether the death-sentenced prisonerdefendant meets the criteria for
competence to proceed, that is, whether the prisonerdefendant has sufficient
present ability to consult with counsel with a reasonable degree of rational
understanding and whether the prisonerdefendant has a rational as well as factual
understanding of the pending collateral proceedings.

                    (B) In considering the issue of competence to proceed, the
experts shall consider and include in their report:

                          (i)    the prisoner’sdefendant’s capacity to understand
the adversary nature of the legal process and the collateral proceedings;

                           (ii) the prisoner’sdefendant’s ability to disclose to
collateral counsel facts pertinent to the postconviction proceeding at issue; and

                          (iii) any other factors considered relevant by the
experts and the court as specified in the order appointing the experts.

                   (C)    [No Change]

              (9) If the experts find that the death-sentenced prisonerdefendant is
incompetent to proceed, the experts shall report on any recommended treatment for
the prisonerdefendant to attain competence to proceed. In considering the issues
relating to treatment, the experts shall report on:

                   (A)    the mental illness or intellectual disability causing the
incompetence;

                     (B) the treatment or treatments appropriate for the mental
illness or intellectual disability of the prisonerdefendant and an explanation of each
of the possible treatment alternatives in order of choices; and

                    (C) the likelihood of the prisonerdefendant attaining
competence under the treatment recommended, an assessment of the probable
duration of the treatment required to restore competence, and the probability that
the prisonerdefendant will attain competence to proceed in the foreseeable future.

                                        - 33 -
             (10) Within 30 days after the experts have completed their
examinations of the death-sentenced prisonerdefendant, the court shall schedule a
hearing on the issue of the prisoner’sdefendant’s competence to proceed.

             (11) If, after a hearing, the court finds the prisonerdefendant
competent to proceed, or, after having found the prisonerdefendant incompetent,
finds that competency has been restored, the court shall enter its order so finding
and shall proceed with a postconviction motion. The prisonerdefendant shall have
60 days to amend his or her rule 3.851 motion only as to those issues that the court
found required factual consultation with counsel.

             (12) If the court does not find the prisonerdefendant incompetent,
the order shall contain:

                   (A)    findings of fact relating to the issues of competency;

                   (B)    copies of the reports of the examining experts; and

                  (C) copies of any other psychiatric, psychological, or social
work reports submitted to the court relative to the mental state of the death-
sentenced prisonerdefendant.

             (13) If the court finds the prisonerdefendant incompetent or finds the
prisonerdefendant competent subject to the continuation of appropriate treatment,
the court shall follow the procedures set forth in rule 3.212(c), except that, to the
extent practicable, any treatment shall take place at a custodial facility under the
direct supervision of the Department of Corrections.

      (h)    After Death Warrant Signed.

             (1) – (7)    [No change]

              (8) Procedures After Hearing. The court shall obtain a transcript
of all proceedings and shall render its order in accordance with subdivision
(f)(5)(D) of this rule as soon as possible after the hearing is concluded. A copy of
the final order shall be electronically transmitted to the Supreme Court of Florida
and to the attorneys of record.

             (9)   [No change]

                                        - 34 -
      (i)    Dismissal of Postconviction Proceedings.

             (1) This subdivision applies only when a prisonerdefendant seeks
both to dismiss pending postconviction proceedings and to discharge collateral
counsel.

             (2) If the prisonerdefendant files the motion pro se, the Clerk of the
Court shall serve copies of the motion on counsel of record for both the
prisonerdefendant and the state. Counsel of record may file responses within 10
days.

              (3) The trial judge shall review the motion and the responses and
schedule a hearing. The prisonerdefendant, collateral counsel, and the state shall be
present at the hearing.

             (4) The judge shall examine the prisonerdefendant at the hearing
and shall hear argument of the prisonerdefendant, collateral counsel, and the state.
No fewer than 2 or more than 3 qualified experts shall be appointed to examine the
prisonerdefendant if the judge concludes that there are reasonable grounds to
believe the prisonerdefendant is not mentally competent for purposes of this rule.
The experts shall file reports with the court setting forth their findings. Thereafter,
the court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing and enter an order setting forth
findings of competency or incompetency.

             (5) If the prisonerdefendant is found to be incompetent for
purposes of this rule, the court shall deny the motion without prejudice.

               (6) If the prisonerdefendant is found to be competent for purposes
of this rule, the court shall conduct a complete (Durocher/Faretta)
(Durocher/Faretta) inquiry to determine whether the prisonerdefendant
knowingly, freely and voluntarily wants to dismiss pending postconviction
proceedings and discharge collateral counsel.

             (7) If the court determines that the prisonerdefendant has made the
decision to dismiss pending postconviction proceedings and discharge collateral
counsel knowingly, freely, and voluntarily, the court shall enter an order
dismissing all pending postconviction proceedings and discharging collateral
counsel. But if the court determines that the prisonerdefendant has not made the
decision to dismiss pending postconviction proceedings and discharge collateral

                                        - 35 -
counsel knowingly, freely, and voluntarily, the court shall enter an order denying
the motion without prejudice.

             (8)    If the court grants the motion:

                   (A) a copy of the motion, the order, and the transcript of the
hearing or hearings conducted on the motion shall be forwarded to the Clerk of the
Supreme Court of Florida within 30 days; and

                     (B) discharged counsel shall, within 10 days after issuance of
the order, file with the clerk of the circuit court 2 copies of a notice seeking review
in the Supreme Court of Florida, and shall, within 20 days after the filing of the
transcript, serve an initial brief. Both the prisonerdefendant and the state may serve
responsive briefs. Briefs shall be served as prescribed by rule 9.210.

             (9) If the court denies the motion, the prisonerdefendant may seek
review as prescribed by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142(b).

       (j)   Attorney General Notification to Clerk. The Office of the Attorney
General shall notify the clerk of the supreme court when it believes the defendant
has completed his or her direct appeal, initial postconviction proceeding in state
court, and habeas corpus proceeding and appeal therefrom in federal court. The
Office of the Attorney General shall serve a copy of the notification on defendant’s
counsel of record.

                                       Repeal

                                    [No Change]

                                     Readoption

                                    [No Change]

                                Court Commentary

                                     [No change]

                                        - 36 -
                    Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

        2014 Amendment. The rule was amended to comply with the “Timely
Justice Act of 2013,” chapter 2013-216, Laws of Florida, and to preclude extended
postconviction litigation. Because the Sixth Amendment does not apply to
postconviction proceedings, the Steering Committee concluded that a defendant
has no constitutional right to self-representation in postconviction matters. The
Steering Committee also concluded that the capital postconviction process would
function more effectively if a defendant were represented by an attorney, unless the
defendant seeks to dismiss postconviction proceedings and discharge counsel
pursuant to subdivision (i). The Steering Committee concluded that the lead
attorney should not be allowed to participate in capital postconviction litigation on
a limited basis and that the lead attorney should remain in the case until the
litigation is concluded or until the court allows withdrawal. The Steering
Committee also determined that the postconviction process would not work
efficiently unless the trial judge was responsible for case management. Case
management orders are required throughout the postconviction process in order to
maintain a capital postconviction computer database.

       Under the amended rule, the clerk of the trial court is required to retain a
copy of the record so that it will be available for postconviction litigation,
especially following issuance of the death warrant. Additionally, the Steering
Committee added provisions to the pleading requirements for motions and created
a provision that allows for written closing argument memoranda, formalizing by
rule a practice that is already utilized throughout the state in capital postconviction
proceedings. In an effort to prevent delay, the amended rule requires written
reports from experts who will testify at the evidentiary hearing, and allows for
witnesses to testify via videoconferencing, even over the objections of the parties.
Finally, the amended rule requires the Attorney General to inform the Clerk of the
Florida Supreme Court and the defendant’s counsel of record when a defendant has
completed his or her litigation in order for the Clerk to report to the Governor
pursuant to Florida Statute 922.052.

RULE 3.852.         CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PUBLIC RECORDS
                    PRODUCTION

      (a) – (c)     [No change]

      (d)    Action Upon Issuance of Mandate.

                                        - 37 -
               (1) Within 15 days after receiving written notification of the
Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming the sentence of death, the attorney
general shall file with the trial court a written notice of the mandate and serve a
copy of it upon the state attorney who prosecuted the case, the Department of
Corrections, and the defendant’s trial counsel. The notice to the state attorney shall
direct the state attorney to submit public records to the records repository within 90
days after receipt of written notification and to notify each law enforcement agency
involved in the investigation of the capital offense, with a copy to the trial court, to
submit public records to the records repository within 90 days after receipt of
written notification. The notice to the Department of Corrections shall direct the
department to submit public records to the records repository within 90 days after
receipt of written notification. The attorney general shall make a good faith effort
to assist in the timely production of public records and written notices of
compliance by the state attorney and the Department of Corrections with copies to
the trial court.

              (2) Within 90 days after receiving written notification of issuance
of the Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming a death sentence, the state
attorney shall provide written notification to the attorney general and to the trial
court of the name and address of any additional person or agency that has public
records pertinent to the case.

              (3) Within 90 days after receiving written notification of issuance
of the Supreme Court of Florida’s mandate affirming a death sentence, the
defendant’s trial counsel shall provide written notification to the attorney general
and to the trial court of the name and address of any person or agency with
information pertinent to the case which has not previously been provided to
collateral counsel.

              (4) Within 15 days after receiving written notification of any
additional person or agency pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this rule, the
attorney general shall notify all persons or agencies identified pursuant to
subdivisions (d)(2) or (d)(3), with a copy to the trial court, that these persons or
agencies are required by law to copy, index, and deliver to the records repository
all public records pertaining to the case that are in their possession. The person or
agency shall bear the costs related to copying, indexing, and delivering the records.
The attorney general shall make a good faith effort to assist in the timely
production of public records and a written notice of compliance by each additional
person or agency with a copy to the trial court.

                                         - 38 -
      (e)    Action Upon Receipt of Notice of Mandate.

              (1) Within 15 days after receipt of a written notice of the mandate
from the attorney general, the state attorney shall provide written notification to
each law enforcement agency involved in the specific case to submit public records
to the records repository within 90 days after receipt of written notification. A copy
of the notice shall be served upon the defendant’s trial counsel and the trial court.
The state attorney shall make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production
of public records and a written notice of compliance by each law enforcement
agency with a copy to the trial court.

             (2) Within 90 days after receipt of a written notice of the mandate
from the attorney general, the state attorney shall copy, index, and deliver to the
records repository all public records, in a current, nonproprietary technology
format, that were produced in the state attorney’s investigation or prosecution of
the case. The state attorney shall bear the costs. The state attorney shall also
provide written notification to the attorney general and the trial court of
compliance with this section, including certifying that, to the best of the state
attorney’s knowledge or belief, all public records in the state attorney’s possession
have been copied, indexed, and delivered to the records repository as required by
this rule.

              (3) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of the
mandate from the attorney general, the Department of Corrections shall copy,
index, and deliver to the records repository all public records, in a current,
nonproprietary technology format, determined by the department to be relevant to
the subject matter of a proceeding under rule 3.851, unless such copying, indexing,
and delivering would be unduly burdensome. In addition, the department shall
provide a copy of the defendant’s medical, psychological, and psychiatric records
to the defendant’s counsel of record. The department shall bear the costs. The
secretary of the department shall provide written notification to the attorney
general and the trial court of compliance with this section certifying that, to the
best of the secretary of the department’s knowledge or belief, all such public
records in the possession of the secretary of the department have been copied,
indexed, and delivered to the records repository.

              (4) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of the
mandate from the state attorney, a law enforcement agency shall copy, index, and
deliver to the records repository all public records, in a current, nonproprietary

                                        - 39 -
technology format, which were produced in the investigation or prosecution of the
case. Each agency shall bear the costs. The chief law enforcement officer of each
law enforcement agency shall provide written notification to the attorney general
and the trial court of compliance with this section including certifying that, to the
best of the chief law enforcement officer’s knowledge or belief, all such public
records in possession of the agency or in possession of any employee of the
agency, have been copied, indexed, and delivered to the records repository.

               (5) Within 90 days after receipt of written notification of the
mandate from the attorney general, each additional person or agency identified
pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this rule shall copy, index, and deliver to
the records repository all public records, in a current, nonproprietary technology
format, which were produced during the prosecution of the case. The person or
agency shall bear the costs. The person or agency shall provide written notification
to the attorney general and the trial court of compliance with this subdivision and
shall certify, to the best of the person or agency’s knowledge and belief, all such
public records in the possession of the person or agency have been copied,
indexed, and delivered to the records repository.

      (f)    Exempt or Confidential Public Records.

             (1) – (2)    [No Change]

             (3) Collateral counsel must file a motion for in camera inspection
within 30 days of receipt of the notice of delivery of the sealed records to the
central records repository, or the in camera inspection will be deemed waived.

      (g)    Demand for Additional Public Records.

              (1) Within 240 days after collateral counsel is appointed, retained,
or appears pro bono, such counsel shall send a written demand for additional
public records to each person or agency submitting public records or identified as
having information pertinent to the case under subdivision (d) of this rule, with a
copy to the trial court. However, if collateral counsel was appointed prior to
October 1, 2001, then within 90 days after collateral counsel is appointed, retained,
or appears pro bono, such counsel shall send a written demand for additional
public records to each person or agency submitting public records or identified as
having information pertinent to the case under subdivision (d) of this rule.

                                        - 40 -
               (2) Within 90 days of receipt of the written demand, each person or
agency notified under this subdivision shall deliver to the records repository any
additional public records in the possession of the person or agency that pertain to
the case and shall certify to the best of the person or agency’s knowledge and
belief that all additional public records have been delivered to the records
repository or, if no additional public records are found, shall recertify that the
public records previously delivered are complete. To the extent that the additional
public records are the defendant’s Department of Corrections’ medical,
psychological, or psychiatric records, the department shall also provide a copy to
the defendant’s counsel of record. A copy of each person’s or agency’s
certification shall be provided to the trial court.

               (3) Within 60 days of receipt of the written demand, any person or
agency may file with the trial court an objection to the written demand described in
subdivision (g)(1). The trial court shall hold a hearing and issue a ruling within 30
dayshear and rule on any objection no later than the next 90-day status conference
after the filing of anythe objection, ordering a person or agency to produce
additional public records if the court determines each of the following exists:

                    (A) Collateral counsel has made a timely and diligent search
as provided in this rule.

                     (B) Collateral counsel’s written demand identifies, with
specificity, those additional public records that are not at the records repository.

                    (C) The additional public records sought are relevant to the
subject matter of a proceeding under rule 3.851, or appear reasonably calculated to
lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

                 (D) The additional public records request is not overly broad or
unduly burdensome.

      (h) – (i)     [No change]

      (j)    Copying of Public Records. Collateral counsel shall provide the
personnel, supplies, and any necessary equipment to copy records held at the
records repository.

                                         - 41 -
       (kj)   Authority of the Court. In proceedings under this rule the trial court
may:

              (1)   compel or deny disclosure of records;

              (2)   conduct an in-camera inspection;

              (3)   extend the times in this rule upon a showing of good cause;

             (4) require representatives from government agencies to appear at
status conferences to address public records issues;

              (45) impose sanctions upon any party, person, or agency affected by
this rule including initiating contempt proceedings, taxing expenses, extending
time, ordering facts to be established, and granting other relief; and

             (56) resolve any dispute arising under this rule unless jurisdiction is
in an appellate court.

       (lk)   Scope of Production and Resolution of Production Issues.

              (1) – (2)    [No Change]

             (3) The trial court may order mediation for any controversy as to
public records production pursuant to this rule in accord with Florida Rules of
Civil Procedure 1.700, 1.710, 1.720, 1.730, or the trial court may refer any such
controversy to a magistrate in accord with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490.

       (ml) Destruction of Records Repository Records. Sixty days after a
capital sentence is carried out, after a defendant is released from incarceration
following the granting of a pardon or reversal of the sentence, or after a defendant
has been resentenced to a term of years, the attorney general shall provide written
notification of this occurrence to the secretary of state with service in accord with
subdivision (c)(1). After the expiration of the 60 days, the secretary of state may
then destroy the copies of the records held by the records repository that pertain to
that case, unless an objection to the destruction is filed in the trial court and served
upon the secretary of state and in accord with subdivision (c)(1). If no objection
has been served within the 60-day period, the records may then be destroyed. If an
objection is served, the records shall not be destroyed until a final disposition of
the objection.

                                         - 42 -
                                       Repeal

                                    [No Change]

                                    Readoption

                                    [No Change]

                    Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

       2014 Amendment. The rule is amended to require the state attorney and
attorney general to manage compliance with the public records process.

            THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

RULE 9.142.        PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW IN DEATH PENALTY
                   CASES

      (a)    Procedure in Death Penalty Appeals.

             (1)   Record.

                   (A)    [No Change]

                    (B) The complete record in a death penalty appeal shall
include all items required by rule 9.200 and by any order issued by the supreme
court. In any appeal following the initial direct appeal, the record that is
electronically transmitted shall begin with the most recent mandate issued by the
supreme court, or the most recent filing not already electronically transmitted in a
prior record in the event the preceding appeal was disposed of without a mandate,
and shall exclude any materials already transmitted to the supreme court as the
record in any prior appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall retain a copy of the
complete record when it transmits the record to the Supreme Court.

                   (C)    [No Change]

             (2) – (5)    [No Change]

                                        - 43 -
     (b) – (d)   [No change]

                               Committee Notes

                                 [No change]

                  Criminal Court Steering Committee Note

      2014 Amendment. Rule 9.142(a)(1)(B) was amended for the clerk of the
lower court to retain a copy of the complete record for use in a subsequent
postconviction proceeding.

                                    - 44 -
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE (enter circuit number) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
          IN AND FOR (enter county name) COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA,                               FELONY DIVISION
                                                CASE NO. (enter case number)
vs.

(enter defendant’s name),

             Defendant.
                                /

       FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AFTER ASSIGNMENT OF
                 THE POSTCONVICTION JUDGE,
              APPOINTING COURT REPORTER, AND
             NOTICE OF FIRST STATUS CONFERENCE

      This capital postconviction case came before the court on its own motion for

case management on (enter date judge assigned to case) when the undersigned

judge was assigned to this case. The appellate mandate was issued on (enter date

of mandate). It is the court’s intent to implement case management procedures

that comport with the timeframes specified in Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

3.851 and 3.852, and Florida Statute, section 27.7081; to enable the timely entry of

                                       - 45 -
a final order within two years after the initial motion is filed. To accomplish this

goal, the court finds and orders as follows.

The court will

 conduct the first status conference within 90 days after the judicial assignment,

   and subsequent status conferences every 90 days thereafter.

 appoint a court reporter by this order.

 require that pleadings be e-mailed to the parties and staff attorney in addition to

   filing and normal service, or use e-filing procedures when implemented.

 e-mail orders to the parties and staff attorney in addition to filing and normal

   service, or use e-filing procedures when implemented.

 dispose of motions or objections requiring a hearing no later than the next

   regularly scheduled status conference.

 report the quarterly planning and status of case activities to the chief judge or

   person designated for reporting to the supreme court every January 1, April 1,

   July 1, and October 1, from the date of the mandate.

 conduct all non-evidentiary hearings in (enter name of county where judge is

   assigned) where the judge is assigned absent objection by the parties, and will

   conduct the evidentiary hearing in (enter name of county where trial

                                        - 46 -
   conducted) where the trial was conducted unless stipulated otherwise by the

   parties. [include this section for decentralized circuits only]

 avoid setting hearings during the first full week of the month when the supreme

   court may schedule oral argument on other capital cases involving the same

   attorney general and collateral counsel.

 determine the availability and accessibility of the trial transcripts and the trial

   appellate record as soon as practical.

The attorney general will

 notice the mandate and public records requirements to the state attorney, the

   department of corrections, and trial counsel by (calculate and enter date =

   mandate + 15 days).

 make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production of public records and

   written notices compliance by the state attorney and the department of

   corrections by (calculate and enter date = mandate + 105 days).

 notify additional persons or agencies identified by the state attorney and trial

   counsel of public records requirements by (calculate and enter date = mandate

   + 120 days).

                                         - 47 -
 make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production of public records and

   written notices of compliance by additional persons or agencies identified by

   the state attorney and trial counsel by (calculate and enter date = mandate +

   210 days).

The state attorney will

 notice law enforcement agencies of public records requirements by (calculate

   and enter date = mandate + 30 days).

 notify the attorney general of additional persons or agencies with information

   pertinent to the case which has not previously been provided to collateral

   counsel by (calculate and enter date = mandate + 105 days).

 make a good faith effort to assist in the timely production of public records and

   written notices of compliance by the law enforcement agencies by (calculate

   and enter date = mandate + 120 days).

Trial counsel will

 provide a copy of the original file including all work product not otherwise

   subject to a protective order to collateral counsel and file a notice of compliance

   by (calculate and enter date = mandate + 45 days).

                                        - 48 -
 notify the attorney general of additional persons or agencies with information

   pertinent to the case which has not previously been provided to collateral

   counsel by (calculate and enter date = mandate + 105 days).

Collateral counsel will

 enter a notice of appearance or a motion to withdraw by (calculate and enter

   date = mandate + 30 days).

 notify the court and the parties within 20 days of the date and disposition of the

   USSC petition for writ of certiorari, or the decision not to file a petition.

 file a motion to compel production of public records within 20 days of any

   missed agency deadline and notice the agency to comply or appear at the next

   regularly scheduled status conference.

 file a motion for in camera inspection within 30 days of receipt of a notice from

   the central records repository of the delivery of sealed records to the clerk, or

   the in camera inspection will be deemed waived.

 file additional demands for public records by (calculate and enter date =

   mandate + 240 days).

 file postproduction demands for public records as soon as practical.

                                         - 49 -
   A second case management order will be entered after disposition of the USSC

petition for writ of certiorari, or 90 days after issuance of the mandate if no petition

is filed.

Appointment of Court Reporter

       It is ORDERED THAT (enter name of court reporting agency, assign trial

court reporter if possible), a court reporter from the list maintained by the Trial

Court Administrator, is hereby appointed to take all proceedings in this

postconviction matter.

Notice of First Status Conference

       The first status conference is set on (enter date and time), in (enter courtroom

number and address). [(enter amount of time set aside for hearing) has been

reserved for the hearing.] Parties may appear in person or by telephone. If appearing

by telephone, (enter telephone conferencing arrangements.)

       DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in (enter chambers city), Florida, on

(enter date and year).

                                        (enter judge’s name)
                                        CIRCUIT JUDGE

                                         - 50 -
                                      NOTICE
 If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
 of certain assistance. Please contact (enter contact information) at least 7 days
  before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this
  notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if
                    you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.

                                       - 51 -
                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above order, including any
attachments, have been sent to the following addressees by U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid or by courthouse box delivery where indicated, to the following persons, on
(enter date and year).

Copies to: (enter names and                     (enter name and title of person
addresses for the following)                    serving copies)

Trial Counsel

Collateral Counsel

Attorney General                                By:___________________________

State Attorney

Central Records Repository

Court Reporter

Clerk of the Court

Court Security

Chief Judge

Staff Attorney

                                       - 52 -
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE (enter circuit number) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
          IN AND FOR (enter county name) COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA,                                FELONY DIVISION
                                                 CASE NO. (enter case number)
vs.

(enter defendant’s name),

             Defendant.
                                 /

               SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
        FOLLOWING DISPOSITION OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF
         CERTIORARI BY UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
          [OR EXPIRATION OF TIME FOR FILING PETITION]

      This capital postconviction case comes before this Court for case

management following the United States Supreme Court’s disposition of the

Defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari [or expiration of time for filing

petition]. [The petition was disposed of on (enter date cert. disposed).] [or The

time for filing a petition expired on (calculate mandate + 90 days).] Various

timeframes contained in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 are triggered

                                        - 53 -
from the date of the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari [or expiration

of the time for filing petition].

       It is this Court’s intention to establish a schedule of conferences and

hearings in conformity with the timeframes contained in rule 3.851, so that a final

order on defendant’s capital postconviction motion can be rendered no later than

(date = three years from date certiorari was disposed of or expiration date for

filing petition), which is within two years after the initial capital postconviction

motion is filed. To accomplish this, it is hereby ORDERED:

Defendant’s capital collateral counsel shall:

 File the initial rule 3.851 motion by (date = one year from date USSC
  certiorari disposition or expiration date for filing petition).

The Office of State Attorney shall:

 File its answer to the initial rule 3.851 motion by (date = initial motion filing
  date above + 60 days).

The Court will:

 Schedule hearings, conferences and other proceedings within the following
  tentative timeframes absent the filing of an amended initial motion:

       o Conduct the case management conference no later than (date = answer
         filing date above + 90 days).

       o Order capital collateral counsel to produce, at the case management
         conference, all documentary exhibits, and to file at the conference an
                                         - 54 -
         exhibit list and a witness list. All expert witnesses shall be specifically
         designated on the witness list, and all expert reports shall be attached to
         the witness list.
       o Order the State to produce no later than (date = case management
         conference date above + 60 days) all documentary exhibits, and to file an
         exhibit list and a witness list. All expert witnesses shall be specifically
         designated on the witness list, and all expert reports shall be attached to
         the witness list.

       o Conduct the evidentiary hearing no later than (date = case management
         conference date above + 150 days).

       o Order the court reporter to produce the evidentiary hearing transcript no
         later than (date = evidentiary hearing date above + 10 days if real-time
         transcription or + 45 days for other transcription).

       o Order capital collateral counsel to file a simultaneous written closing
         arguments no later than (date = transcript production date above + 30
         days).

       o Order the state to file a simultaneous written closing argument no later
         than (date = transcript production date above + 30 days).

       o Enter the final order by (date = transcript production date above + 60
         days).
•   Commence quarterly chief judge reporting to the chief justice pursuant to
    AOSC11-32 after (date = initial motion filing date + 18 months), when the
    initial motion has been pending for 18 months.

 Note that, pursuant to Florida Statutes, section the clerk of the supreme court
  will report, to the legislature, the status of this case and the name of the
  assigned judge to the legislature after (date = initial motion + 3 years), when
  the initial motion has been pending for more than 3 years.

                                       - 55 -
      A third case management order will be entered after the initial capital

postconviction motion is filed.

      DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in (enter chambers city), Florida, on
(enter date and year).

                                        (enter judge’s name)
                                        CIRCUIT JUDGE

                                      NOTICE
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of
certain assistance. Please contact (enter contact information) at least 7 days before
your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this notification if
the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or
voice impaired, call 711.

                                         - 56 -
                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above order, including any
attachments, have been sent to the following addressees by U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid or by courthouse box delivery where indicated, to the following persons, on
(enter date and year).

Copies to: (enter names and                     (enter name and title of person
addresses for the following)                    serving copies)

Capital Collateral Counsel

Attorney General

State Attorney

Court Reporter

Clerk of the Court

Court Security

Chief Judge

Staff Attorney

                                                By:___________________________

                                       - 57 -
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE (enter circuit number) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
          IN AND FOR (enter county name) COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA,                                  FELONY DIVISION
                                                   CASE NO. (enter case number)
vs.

(enter defendant’s name),

             Defendant.
                                  /

                  THIRD CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
       ON FILING OF INITIAL POSTCONVICTION MOTION AND
          NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

      This capital postconviction case came before the court on its own motion for

case management on the defendant’s initial postconviction motion filed on (enter

date initial motion filed). Timeframes in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.851 are derived from this date. It is the court’s intent to set activities in

timeframes that comport with the rule; to enable the timely entry of a final order by

(calculate and enter date = two years from date initial motion filed above), two

years after the initial motion is filed. To accomplish this goal, the court finds and

orders as follows.

                                          - 58 -
The court will

 determine from collateral counsel whether leave to file an amended motion is

   requested, and if so whether the case management conference will be continued

   until after an amended answer is filed.

 set the case management conference below, within 90 days after the answer is

   filed; or after the amended answer is filed, if required.

Collateral counsel will

 file an amended motion by (enter date negotiated with the court, typically 60

   days after all public records are received), if requested.

 produce exhibit and witness lists, and experts reports at the case management

   conference, set below.

The state will

 file an answer by (calculate and enter date = initial motion filing date above +

   60 days).

 file an amended answer by (calculate and enter date = amended motion filing

   date above + 20 days), if required.

 produce exhibit and witness lists, and expert reports by (calculate and enter

   date = case management conference date below + 60 days).

                                         - 59 -
Notice of Case Management Conference

      The case management conference is set on (enter date and time), in (enter

courtroom number and address). [(enter amount of time set aside for hearing) has

been reserved for the hearing.] Parties may appear in person or by telephone. If

appearing by telephone, (enter telephone conferencing arrangements.)

      A fourth case management order will be entered after the case management

conference is conducted.

      DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in (enter chambers city), Florida, on

(enter date and year).

                                       (enter judge’s name)
                                       CIRCUIT JUDGE

                                      NOTICE
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
of certain assistance. Please contact (enter contact information) at least 7 days
before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this
notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if
you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.

                                       - 60 -
                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above order, including any
attachments, have been sent to the following addressees by U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid or by courthouse box delivery where indicated, to the following persons, on
(enter date and year).

Copies to: (enter names and                     (enter name and title of person
addresses for the following)                    serving copies)

Collateral Counsel

Attorney General

State Attorney                                  By:___________________________

Court Reporter

Clerk of the Court

Court Security

Chief Judge

Staff Attorney

                                       - 61 -
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE (enter circuit number) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
          IN AND FOR (enter county name) COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA,                                 FELONY DIVISION
                                                  CASE NO. (enter case number)
vs.

(enter defendant’s name),

             Defendant.
                                 /

               FOURTH CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
           FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
                             AND
                NOTICE OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING

      This capital postconviction case came before this Court at the case

management conference conducted on (enter date of case management

conference). Various timeframes contained in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.851 are triggered from the date of the filing of the initial motion for

postconviction relief.

      It is this Court’s intention to establish a schedule of conferences and

hearings in conformity with the timeframes contained in rule 3.851, so that a final

                                         - 62 -
order on defendant’s capital postconviction motion can be rendered no later than

(date = three years from date cert denied by USSC), which is within two years

after the initial capital postconviction motion is filed. To accomplish this, it is

hereby ORDERED:

             At the case management conference, the court heard argument on

whether claims raised in the motion/amended motion require a factual

determination at an evidentiary hearing. The court granted an evidentiary hearing

on the following claims:

      (enter claim numbers and/or description of claims requiring a factual

determination).

      The court denied an evidentiary hearing on the following claims:

      (enter claim numbers and/or description of claims not requiring a factual

determination).

      The parties estimated that (enter total estimate of hearing days) days will be

required for those claims for which evidentiary hearing was granted; [defense

(enter estimate of days for defense case) days and state (enter estimate of day for

state case) days].

                                         - 63 -
Notice of Evidentiary Hearing

      An evidentiary hearing is set from (enter evidentiary hearing start date and

time, which should be a date within 150 days of case management conference date

above) through (enter evidentiary hearing end date), in (enter courtroom number

and address). The Defendant shall be present for the evidentiary hearing.

      The following shall be done prior to the evidentiary hearing:

Defendant’s capital collateral counsel shall:

 No later than (enter date negotiated with the court) submit transport orders to
  chambers for the Defendant and any Florida inmate witnesses.

 No later than (enter date negotiated with the court) submit a writ of habeas
  corpus ad testificandum to compel the appearance of any federal or out-of-state
  inmate witness.

 No later than (enter date negotiated with the court) submit certificates of
  materiality and other documentation necessary to secure attendance of out-of-
  state witnesses to chambers or to compel the appearance of any out-of-state
  witness.

The parties shall:

 No later than (enter date negotiated with court), make arrangements with Court
  Technology for the appearance of any witnesses appearing by video conference.

 No later than ten days before the start of the evidentiary hearing, meet in a good
  faith effort to narrow the issues in dispute by stipulating in writing to as many
  facts as possible and to stipulate to the admissibility of as many exhibits as
  possible.

                                       - 64 -
 No later than two business days before the start of the evidentiary hearing, meet
  with the clerk to pre-mark exhibits.

      During the evidentiary hearing:

The Court will:

 Set the daily hearing schedule from (enter start time) a.m. to (enter stop time)
  p.m. with lunch from (enter start lunch time) to (enter stop lunch time, 90
  minutes enables parties to handle issues that arise during the hearing).

      Following the evidentiary hearing:

The court reporter shall:

 Produce the evidentiary hearing transcript by (date = evidentiary hearing date
  above + 10 days if real-time transcription or + 45 days for other transcription).

Defendant’s capital collateral counsel shall:

 Submit and serve a simultaneous written closing argument no later than (date =
  transcript production date above + 30 days).
The State shall:

 Submit and serve a simultaneous written closing argument no later than (date =
  transcript production date above + 30 days).
The Court will:
 Enter the final order no later than (date = transcription production date above +
  60 days).

                                        - 65 -
      DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in (enter chambers city), Florida, on

(enter date and year).

                                       (enter judge’s name)
                                       CIRCUIT JUDGE

                                     NOTICE

If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
of certain assistance. Please contact (enter contact information) at least 7 days
before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this
notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if
you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.

                                       - 66 -
                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above order, including any
attachments, have been sent to the following addressees by U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid or by courthouse box delivery where indicated, to the following persons, on
(enter date and year).

Copies to: (enter names and                     (enter name and title of person
addresses for the following)                    serving copies)

Collateral Counsel

Attorney General

State Attorney

Court Reporter

Clerk of the Court

Court Security

Chief Judge

Staff Attorney

                                                By:___________________________

                                       - 67 -