Court Opinion

ID: 2925746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:26:25.97493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:55.777809
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00166-CV

                                   COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                          CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

         IN RE: GARRETT PAVING & MAINTENANCE, INC.
____________________________________________________________

                On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
                      and Motion for Stay
____________________________________________________________

                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION

     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides
                   Memorandum Opinion1 Per Curiam

        Relator, Garrett Paving & Maintenance, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus

and motion for stay in the above cause on March 31, 2008.

        The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and motion for stay, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief

sought.

        1
          See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but
is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).
       Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay are DENIED.

See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

                                                    PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 1st day of April, 2008.

                                          2