Court Opinion

ID: 7744529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:07:55.906656+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:34.582204
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 16, 2001, the Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction. Because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not authorized, rendition of the underlying order was not delayed. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Consequently, the notice of appeal was not *566timely filed. The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
MINER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.