Court Opinion

ID: 6319431
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-02 19:00:37.071832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:39.273529
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10621      Document: 00516221199         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/02/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  No. 21-10621                           March 2, 2022
                                Summary Calendar
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Devundre Ghoston,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:18-CR-395-2

   Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Devundre Ghoston has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Ghoston has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10621     Document: 00516221199          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/02/2022

                                   No. 21-10621

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. However, we disagree with counsel’s assertion that the
   judgment should be modified to correct a purported clerical error in the
   judgment. Consistent with the oral pronouncement, the written judgment
   includes a statement that the district court intends for Ghoston’s federal
   sentence to run “fully concurrent with any future state sentence(s)
   imposed.”     Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2