Court Opinion

ID: 9388020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-19 18:00:42.542666+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:17.250296
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40605         Document: 00516717316             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/19/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-40605
                                                                                       FILED
                                                                                   April 19, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   David Arturo Caliz-Nieto,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 1:22-CR-263-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Arturo
   Caliz-Nieto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Caliz-Nieto has not filed a response.
   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40605     Document: 00516717316         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/19/2023

                                  No. 22-40605

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2