Court Opinion

ID: 9795932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 03:42:54.666583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:03.222415
License: Public Domain

WOLLHEIM, P. J.,
concurring.
I concur with the majority opinion’s holding that the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court erred because there are genuine *775issues of material fact that must be determined by a fact-finder. For example, there are genuine issues of material fact regarding the existence of an oral partnership agreement between plaintiffs and defendants and, if an oral partnership between the parties exists, the number of acres included therein. Because there are genuine issues of material fact, I concur with the majority opinion’s conclusion that the limited judgment must be reversed and remanded.