Court Opinion

ID: 3189369
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-29 14:06:16.971928+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:10.580827
License: Public Domain

=================================================================
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 72 SSM 1
The People &c.,
            Respondent,
        v.
Ronnell Jordan,
            Appellant.

          Submitted by Kevin C. Adam, for appellant.
          Submitted by Amy Appelbaum, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:
          The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
          Defendant failed to preserve his contention that the
trial court discharged prospective jurors based on hardship
without conducting a sufficient inquiry (see People v King, __
NY3d __ [decided herewith]).   Defendant's remaining contentions

                               - 1 -
                     - 2 -   No. SSM 1

are without merit.

                     - 2 -
People v Ronnell Jordan
No. SSM 1

Rivera, J (dissenting):
            For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in
People v King (___ NY3d ___, [decided herewith]), I would reverse
the order of the Appellate Division on the sole ground that the
judge's jury selection process denied defendant his right to a
jury trial.
*   *   *     *   *   *   *   *    *      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Judges Pigott, Abdus-Salaam,
Stein and Fahey concur. Judge Rivera dissents in an opinion.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judge Garcia took no part.

Decided March 29, 2016

                                  - 1 -