Court Opinion

ID: 9828232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:13:31.188245+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:46.171024
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant complains because of the failure of this court to pass upon his twelfth, fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth, twenty-sixth, twenty-ninth, thirtieth, thirty-second, thirty-third, and 33A assignments of error. The twelfth assignment is overruled for the reasons, among others not necessary to here enter into, given in the original opinion for overruling the eleventh assignment. Under the fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth assignments complaint is made of the exclusion of the testimony of Mrs. Umberger to the effect that Mrs. Henderson received no money for a certain $5,000 note executed to the bank. As this note was a renewal of an existing note for a like amount the excluded testimony was immaterial, and the assignments are overruled. In the twenty-sixth, twenty-ninth thirty-first, thirty-second, thirty-third, and 33A assignments complaint is made of the peremptory instruction against appellant. These assignments are overruled, for the reasons given for overruling the eleventh assignment. Complaint is made that a certain check which was shown to be three years old was charged against Mrs. Henderson’s account at the bank. The check purported to be dated January 24, 1914, and was charged on the account on January 24, 1917. The undisputed evidence conclusively shows that the true date of the check was as of the latter date, and that its purported date was necessarily error. This assignment is overruled.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.