Court Opinion

ID: 8425661
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 01:49:56.114271+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:30.557291
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Daniel Staley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Staley v. Harmon, No. CA-03-3390-9-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED