Court Opinion

ID: 9513312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:34:12.005575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:49.147548
License: Public Domain

*658NEUMANN, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
[¶31] I concur in the first parts of the majority’s opinion reversing suppression of the evidence discovered in the searches of the passenger compartment and the trunk of Olson’s automobile. I dissent, however, from part III.B., holding the agent’s affidavit demonstrated a sufficient nexus with Olson’s motel room to support issuing a warrant for its search. I do not think a nexus was shown. In my opinion, this case is more of a Mische than a Metzner. I would affirm suppression of the evidence seized in the search of the motel room.
[¶ 32] William A. Neumann