Court Opinion

ID: 9425712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:15:31.680214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:57.123518
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice White,
with whom Mr. Justice-Powell joins, concurring.
I .join the Court’s opinion, and agree that there was no constitutional necessity under Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U. S. 67 (1972), or any other-case in this Court to accord the owner-lessor of the yacht a hearing in the circumstances of this case. I add, however, that the presence of important public interests which permits dispensing with a preseizure hearing in the instant case, is only one of the situations in which no prior hearing is required.. See Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co., ante, p. 600; Arnett v. Kennedy, ante, p. 134 (White, J., concurring).