Court Opinion

ID: 5112264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 16:05:27.336061+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:37.927057
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Jarrod L. Gill appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0851 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *599affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.