Court Opinion

ID: 9442419
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 18:46:31.235013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:05.522912
License: Public Domain

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge
(specially concurring) .
It must be conceded that the motion of May 27, 1948, referred to in the opinion, is not denominated or clearly phrased as a motion to set aside a judgment. However, *119the relief actually sought was to set aside the prior order of dismissal, and this was recognized by the trial Court in his order overruling the motion. I think it should be considered and disposed of in accordance with the manifest intention of the movant. From this would result that the order overruling it was a final judgment. However, the motion presents no meritorious ground, and the order overruling it should be affirmed.