Court Opinion

ID: 3515051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:26:14.448172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:55.326944
License: Public Domain

The sole question for determination in this case, as stated by both sides in the trial court and as recited in the decree, is whether interest is recoverable on the bonds and interest coupons of the drainage district after maturity and until paid. This question was answered in the affirmative in the recent decision in City of Indianola v. Gates, 181 Miss. 145, 179 So. 284, in respect to municipal bonds, and we see no sound reason for any distinction between municipal bonds and those of other political or taxing districts of the State, such as drainage districts.
If it could be supposed that as to any of the subdivisions of the State, whether of counties, municipalities or districts, no interest after maturity could be recovered on their bonds issued for borrowed money, such bonds would be unsalable at any advantageous price; and we must assume that the legislature never for a moment thought that the statutes would be fairly capable of any such an interpretation as would bring about that self-destructive result.
Reversed and remanded.