Court Opinion

ID: 9365002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-20 21:00:34.106668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:41.887292
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2116      Doc: 12         Filed: 01/19/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2116

        SARIA WALKER, United States of American Citizens,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS,
        INCORPORATED; PRISMA HEALTH; SAINT FRANCES DOWNTOWN;
        SAINT FRANCES EASTSIDE; THE CAROLINA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL
        HEALTH; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES;
        GREER POLICE DEPARTMENT; GREENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT;
        GREENVILLE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Clerk of Court;
        GREENLINK; GREENVILLE LIBRARY SYSTEM, Downtown and Anderson
        Road Branches,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:22-cv-02946-HMH)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 19, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Saria Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2116         Doc: 12      Filed: 01/19/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Saria Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s October 20, 2022, order adopting

        the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice Walker’s

        42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

        28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.

        R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The

        order Walker seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

        collateral order. On October 24, 2022, the district court granted Walker’s motion to reopen

        the case and provided Walker 14 days to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s report.

        See Walker v. U.S. Fed. Gov’t, No. 6:22-cv-02946-HMH (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2022). The case

        remains pending in the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

        jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                       DISMISSED

                                                     2