Court Opinion

ID: 9902383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-26 23:02:10.858607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:49.729848
License: Public Domain

Filed 11/22/23 Kingdom of Sweden v. Mehmandoost CA4/3

                      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                     FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                DIVISION THREE

 KINGDOM OF SWEDEN,

      Plaintiff and Respondent,                                        G061798

           v.                                                          (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020-01153336)

 ZAHRA MEHMANDOOST,                                                    OPINION

      Defendant and Appellant.

                   Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, David A.
Hoffer, Judge. Affirmed.
                   Zahra Mehmandoost, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
                   Law Offices of Ernest Mooney and W. Ernest Mooney for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
              Defendant Zahra Mehmandoost appeals from the judgment entered after the
trial court granted plaintiff Kingdom of Sweden’s motion for summary judgment. We
must affirm because Mehmandoost has failed to designate an adequate record necessary
for us to review the order granting summary judgment.
              It is the appellant’s burden on appeal to provide an adequate record to
assess error and an appellant’s failure to do so warrants affirmance of the judgment.
(Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1140–1141.) “‘On review of an order
granting or denying summary judgment, we examine the facts presented to the trial court
and determine their effect as a matter of law.’ [Citation.] We review the entire record,
‘considering all the evidence set forth in the moving and opposition papers except that to
which objections have been made and sustained.’” (Regents of University of California
v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 618.)
              Here, our record is essentially limited to a copy of the judgment entered in
favor of Kingdom of Sweden and against Mehmandoost “for the sum of $119,482.00, the
U.S. dollar equivalent of 1,223,209 Swedish Crowns, and post-judgment interest on the
foregoing sum at the legal rate.” The judgment states it was precipitated by the trial
court’s order granting Kingdom of Sweden’s motion for summary judgment on the
ground no triable issues of material fact existed as to Kingdom of Sweden’s single claim
                       1
against Mehmandoost. Our record does not include the court’s order granting summary
judgment, any pleading, Kingdom of Sweden’s moving papers, Mehmandoost’s opposing
papers, if any, or the evidence offered in connection with that motion.
              Self-represented litigants such as Mehmandoost must follow the rules of
procedure and are not entitled to “exceptionally lenient treatment.” (Rappleyea v.

1
  The record also contains the register of actions, Mehmandoost’s notice of appeal, and
her designation of the record on appeal in which she requested the preparation of a
clerk’s transcript, but did not request that the clerk include any particular documents in
that transcript.

                                             2
Campbell (1994) 8 Cal.4th 975, 984; Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1247.)
As Mehmandoost failed to designate an adequate record that would enable us to evaluate
any contention of error in the granting of the motion for summary judgment, we must
affirm. (Ketchum v. Moses, supra, 24 Cal.4th at pp. 1140–1141.)

                                    DISPOSITION
             The judgment is affirmed. Respondent to recover costs on appeal.

                                               MOTOIKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

GOETHALS, ACTING P. J.

SANCHEZ, J.

                                           3