Court Opinion

ID: 9381422
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-22 20:04:23.213051+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:32.485829
License: Public Domain

NOTICE               2023 IL App (4th) 220852-U
 This Order was filed under
                                                                                     FILED
 Supreme Court Rule 23 and is            NO. 4-22-0852                             March 21, 2023
 not precedent except in the                                                        Carla Bender
 limited circumstances allowed                                                  4th District Appellate
 under Rule 23(e)(1).
                                 IN THE APPELLATE COURT                               Court, IL
                                         OF ILLINOIS

                                      FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAWNNA S. W.,                                             )      Appeal from the
            Petitioner-Appellee,                           )      Circuit Court of
            v.                                             )      Woodford County
ERIC D. W.,                                                )      No. 17D46
            Respondent-Appellant.                          )
                                                           )      Honorable
                                                           )      Charles M. Feeney III,
                                                           )      Judge Presiding.

                JUSTICE KNECHT delivered the judgment of the court.
                Justices Cavanagh and Harris concurred in the judgment.

                                            ORDER

¶1     Held: The appellate court affirmed the denial of a petition for an order of protection
             under the Domestic Violence Act of 1986. The trial court’s determination
             instances of conduct alleged in the petition were not abuse and were caused by a
             medical issue that had since resolved was not against the manifest weight of the
             evidence.

¶2              On November 15, 2021, the trial court entered an emergency order of protection

under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 (Act) (750 ILCS 60/101 et seq. (West 2020))

in favor of respondent, Eric D. W., against petitioner, Shawnna S. W., prohibiting Shawnna from

contacting Eric or their minor children. The order arose from an incident on September 21, 2021,

during which Shawnna behaved erratically and was transported to a local hospital for a mental-

health evaluation. On November 15, 2021, the trial court granted an emergency order of

protection, which it extended multiple times without objection. On August 23, 2022, the court
denied Eric’s request for a plenary order of protection, finding no abuse occurred and Shawnna’s

behavior arose from a medical condition that had since been identified and resolved. We affirm.

¶3                                     I. BACKGROUND

¶4             In September 2021, operating under a joint parenting plan, Shawnna was the

primary residential parent of the parties’ two daughters, S.W., then 13 years old, and E.W., then

11 years old. On November 3, 2021, Shawnna filed a petition for a finding of abuse of allocated

parenting time alleging, since September 21, 2021, Eric refused to return the children to her or

comply with the parenting plan. The record shows Shawnna also has a son, Kadin, then age 22,

fathered by another man, and a young child, N.F., fathered by Shawnna’s then boyfriend

Brandon. Throughout the proceedings, the parties disputed whether Brandon was still Shawnna’s

boyfriend.

¶5             On November 15, 2021, Eric filed a petition for an order of protection alleging,

on September 21, 2021, the police went to Shawnna’s home to conduct a welfare check. He

alleged Shawnna was in a state of fear and hysteria and behaving erratically, which had a

profound effect on the children. Emergency medical services (EMS) transported Shawnna to a

local hospital for a mental-health evaluation, and emergency responders told him the children

were not safe at home with Shawnna in her current state of mind. Eric also alleged Shawnna

exhibited erratic and odd behavior, raising mental-health concerns, on various dates beginning in

April 2021. He alleged, after September 21, 2021, he attempted supervised parenting time,

during which Shawnna “yelled” and “screamed,” and Shawnna further harassed him by text

messages and came to his house “four to five times a week,” “screaming and acting erratic.”

                                               -2-
¶6              The trial court entered an emergency order of protection, placing primary care of

the children with Eric and prohibiting Shawnna from communicating with Eric or coming within

500 feet of him. The court reserved a determination of parenting time until a later hearing.

¶7              On November 22, 2021, the trial court entered an interim order of protection,

allowing Shawnna telephone or video calls with the children three days per week and attendance

at extracurricular activities, provided she had no communication with Eric. The court set the

order to expire on January 4, 2022. Beginning on January 4, 2022, the court extended the interim

order multiple times, either by agreement of the parties or without objection from Shawnna. The

order also allowed supervised visitation as recommended by the children’s counselor.

¶8              In March 2022, Eric filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence not disclosed

during discovery. The trial court granted the motion. Eric also moved to modify child support.

On April 29, 2022, Shawnna filed a response to the petition for an order of protection, admitting

“on September 21, 2021, she experienced a psychological episode due to a dangerously low

potassium level, due to a recent COVID 19 illness.” She admitted she was held in psychiatric

care until her potassium levels were brought back to normal. She generally denied the remaining

allegations of Eric’s petition and alleged Eric interfered with her visitation with the children.

¶9              On April 29 and June 27, 2022, the trial court held a hearing on the merits. There

is no transcript of the hearing in the record, but the trial court certified a bystander’s report of the

proceedings. Thus, the following facts are derived from the bystander’s report.

¶ 10            The police report, ambulance report, and photos of Shawnna’s home from

September 21, 2021, were admitted into evidence by stipulation in lieu of testimony. The trial

court admitted a document concerning Shawnna’s hospital admissions without objection. The

court also admitted various medical records.

                                                  -3-
¶ 11           The police report of September 21, 2021, prepared by officer Daniel Boles,

showed, on September 21, 2021, at around 5 p.m., officers were dispatched to Shawnna’s home

for a welfare check. Upon arrival, several individuals starting running away from the house and

waving to the officers to come to them. The individuals broke up into two groups; one group

consisted of Kadin, his girlfriend Taylor, S.W., and E.W. The other group consisted of Shawnna,

Brandon, and N.F. Brandon told Boles there was a problem between Shawnna and Brandon

concerning a safe, which had been removed from the home and was lying on a sidewalk in the

yard. There was a verbal exchange between the two groups, with each placing the blame for the

incident on each other. Boles also wrote there was clear hostility between Shawnna and Taylor,

whom Shawana believed was responsible for calling the police.

¶ 12           Boles spoke with Shawnna. Her speech was frantic, and her story was expansive

and whimsical. She spoke of a man who was in her home a few nights prior to retrieve items

from a safe and stated she pulled out a cold beer, left it on the counter, and begged him not to

hurt her and her child. She told Boles she did not call 911 because she was ashamed of the

condition of the home and did not want anyone to see it. Shawnna then told Boles about a recent

drive to Elmwood, Illinois, where she encountered the funeral procession of a man who died in a

motorcycle accident. Shawnna said she let the car do the driving and was supernaturally drawn to

the man in the casket of the hearse. Shawnna also spoke about visions and said, on her recent car

ride to Elmwood, she encountered the devil in snake form while N.F. was urinating on the side of

the road. Boles described Shawnna’s body as constantly in motion. Shawnna indicated she

needed money to get away from Brandon and told Boles Brandon had installed a tracker on her

vehicle. Boles noted it was apparent Shawnna was in distress and, as her level of fear and

hysteria worsened, it had a profound effect on the children who were present.

                                               -4-
¶ 13           Jim Dotter, an intake specialist for mental-health services, arrived and

recommended transport to a hospital for a mental-health evaluation. EMS arrived, and paramedic

Tim Strong opined the children were not safe at home with Shawnna in her current state of mind.

Shawnna was unwilling to release her embrace of N.F. and resisted getting into the ambulance.

However, after some time and encouragement, she complied, and N.F. was picked up by Cheryl

Thomas, N.F.’s grandmother. S.W. and E.W. left with Kadin. After Shawnna left in the

ambulance, Boles checked the house. He did not find any forced entry, but the entire area was

chaotic. Items were strewn throughout the house. Photographs in the record confirm Boles’s

observations about the condition of the home.

¶ 14           Strong reported he came to the scene in response to a behavioral emergency.

Shawnna was uncooperative and agitated. She denied thoughts of self-harm. EMS transported

Shawnna to a hospital, where staff noted she was delusional and hallucinating and diagnosed her

with unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition,

hypokalemia (low potassium), and suspected exposure to COVID-19. The hospital prescribed

acetaminophen, potassium chloride, and olanzapine. The record also indicates Shawnna was

prescribed Haldol and Ativan.

¶ 15           On September 23, 2021, Shawnna was admitted to inpatient behavioral healthcare

at another hospital and released the same day. Shawnna reported she did not know why she was

there and stated she thought she was perhaps a little more paranoid than normal because her

potassium was low. The consultation notes for Shawnna’s visit described her as a female patient

with an unknown previously diagnosed psychiatric history who was admitted to inpatient

psychiatric treatment for acute stabilization. The notes stated she did not exhibit any acute

symptoms of acute psychosis following repletion of “K+.” The report further stated Shawnna did

                                                -5-
not require current psychotropic medication. However, the notes also stated Shawnna remained

an acute risk to harm herself, and the hospital discharged her to her mother with plans for an

outpatient psychotherapy follow-up.

¶ 16           S.W. testified Shawnna had “been acting weird for a long time” and stated she did

not feel safe with her. S.W. testified about various instances in which Shawnna scared her or

made her uncomfortable. For example, S.W. testified about events during which Shawnna

“would just drive around with no point.” S.W. would ask where they were going, and Shawnna

would say, “just trust her,” and they would “not end up really going anywhere.” Instead, they

would just “end up back home, after taking turns and turns for 30 to 45 minutes driving in the

country.” S.W. also recounted when they crossed a bridge, Shawnna said, “I bet you girls wish I

would jump off this bridge.” S.W. testified Shawnna also spoke about Satan and death and would

say she saw the devil in snake form, scaring S.W. and E.W. A few weeks before September 21,

2021, Shawnna texted S.W. and asked her to make sure she locked the doors because Shawnna

had a bad feeling something was going to happen to them. S.W. described another incident,

possibly in August 2021, where Shawnna laid on the bed all day in only a towel saying things

like, “please don’t take him away.” Between June and September 2021, Shawnna said she heard

someone break into the basement and said she was too scared to look.

¶ 17           S.W. stated she did not like Brandon and said he and Shawnna fought constantly.

Although she had never seen Brandon be physical with Shawnna, S.W. recounted an incident

where she saw Brandon grab Kadin by the throat. During the summer of 2021, Kadin removed a

tracking device from Shawnna’s car that Brandon had placed on it. S.W. also testified about

other incidents in which Brandon made her feel uncomfortable.

                                               -6-
¶ 18            Regarding September 21, 2021, S.W. testified Shawnna picked up her and E.W.

after school and drove to the doctor’s office so S.W. could have a physical exam for school.

After leaving the doctor’s office, S.W. asked Shawnna if they could get food from McDonald’s,

but Shawnna said no, because, “[w]e have to do something. Just trust me.” Shawnna then drove

to a bank to make a money transaction. Afterward, Shawnna drove to another bank in another

town to make another money transaction, which S.W. thought did not make sense. S.W. texted

Kadin’s girlfriend, Taylor, that Shawnna was acting strange. When they arrived at Shawnna’s

house, Shawnna went inside and got a pair of earrings belonging to Kadin’s daughter and took

them over to the neighbor’s house. Kadin arrived with Taylor, and S.W. and E.W. immediately

got into Taylor’s car. Meanwhile, Kadin saw a safe sitting by the front door and went to help

Shawnna to move it to the curb. The police then arrived. Shawnna began yelling at Kadin and

Taylor, telling them, “this is all your fault.” She then started yelling about a battery on the

ground that had fallen from the safe, telling everyone to get away from it because it was going to

explode. When the police placed the battery in a garbage can, Shawnna yelled the garbage was

going to explode and stated, “[t]his is my [v]ision. Run away from the house.” S.W. and E.W.

were scared and ran to the side of the road by Taylor. S.W. testified Shawnna was not making

sense, and she was scared and confused about it. She and E.W. left with Kadin and drove to

Eric’s house.

¶ 19            From September 21, 2021, to the issuance of the order of protection, Shawnna

attempted to see S.W., and S.W. refused. Eric supported that decision. When asked about events

after September 21, 2021, S.W. stated that things were not going well. She said there was a lot of

tension at meetings with Shawnna. At the first meeting, in the fall of 2021, Shawnna pretended

like nothing happened. S.W. said when she and E.W. tried to talk to Shawnna about the incident,

                                                 -7-
Shawnna said she would talk to them about it at a proper time and accused Eric of brainwashing

S.W. At a meeting one week later at a coffee shop, Shawnna told S.W. and E.W. to get off their

phones and asked Eric to take the phones from them. S.W. did not want to give up her phone

because otherwise she would have to talk to Shawnna. S.W. stated she still did not feel safe

around Shawnna and would not feel safe again unless Shawnna apologized for the events, took

responsibility for them, and got help. She said she would like a relationship with “pre-Brandon”

Shawnna.

¶ 20           On cross-examination, S.W. acknowledged she always calls Shawnna by her first

name, stating she does not feel like Shawnna deserves to be called “Mom” because of all the

things they have gone through. S.W. testified she and E.W. are afraid to be alone with Shawnna.

She said Shawnna continuously tries to have a relationship with her, but S.W. does not want one

and does not want to talk to Shawnna on the phone. During 2022, she had been seeing Shawnna

and N.F. every Sunday but said she tries not to talk to Shawnna and spends the time with her

sister instead. She admitted there were things they did during the summer of 2021 that were fun

and during which she was not afraid of Shawnna.

¶ 21           Kadin testified his relationship with Shawnna had gone drastically downhill due

to her relationship with Brandon. On September 21, 2021, Kadin said he was at work and learned

Shawnna gave away earrings to a neighbor that she was supposed to be keeping for his daughter

when she got older. When he arrived at Shawnna’s house with Taylor, the girls immediately got

into the car. Shawnna approached Kadin and said, “[t]ime is coming, the [e]nd is [n]ear.” Both

Taylor and Shawnna’s mother called the police. Kadin went to get the earrings back from the

neighbor and then helped Shawnna take the safe out of the house. As they exited the house and

started going down the porch stairs, Shawnna changed her mind about removing the safe and

                                              -8-
wanted to bring it back into the house. Kadin testified Shawnna jumped on the safe and it fell

down the porch stairs onto the concrete, broke, and a battery from the locking system fell out.

Shawnna then started yelling the battery was going to explode, and the police arrived. Kadin

testified it was chaotic, and the girls were scared and upset. On cross-examination, Kadin

admitted he also retrieved an air compressor from the garage and used it to “bash” the safe and

“snapped” fishing poles during the incident. He acknowledged Shawnna did not ask him to break

into the safe and said his frustration was boiling over. He further admitted his behavior “freaked

his sisters out” and said he could not defend his actions that day.

¶ 22           Kadin testified he witnessed other incidents. For example, a week earlier,

Shawnna texted him late one evening stating she heard a noise in the basement and believed

someone had broken into the home. During the summer of 2021, Shawnna also acted very

strange at family dinners. Kadin believed Shawnna was acting strange because of her issues with

Brandon. He testified he knew Brandon had placed a tracking device on Shawnna’s vehicle,

which Kadin discarded in a dumpster behind Walmart. Kadin testified about his poor relationship

with Brandon and described an incident in approximately January 2020, during which Brandon

put his hands around Kadin’s throat. Kadin said the girls were present when it happened, and

S.W. witnessed it.

¶ 23           Kadin testified he was concerned for his sisters. He said Shawnna was not the

same mother she used to be. Kadin had not talked to Shawnna about the events of September 21,

2021. He testified he does not want a relationship with Shawnna moving forward. Kadin did not

agree Brandon had moved out of Shawnna’s house. However, he also said he knew Brandon was

not living at Shawnna’s house in September 2021, and he had changed the locks on Shawnna’s

door at her request in order to lock Brandon out.

                                                -9-
¶ 24           Eric testified, between June and September 2021, S.W. and E.W. told him about

Shawnna’s behavior and the incidents S.W. testified about. On September 21, 2021, he met

Kadin and the girls at his home. He said everyone was upset, with S.W. in tears and E.W. so

upset she was stuttering. A Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) investigator

contacted him the next day and said, until they investigated the situation, Eric should not let the

girls go back with Shawnna. An investigator met with the girls at school the following week.

Eric said the DCFS investigator told him the girls needed a period to “cool off’” and to get

counseling. With counseling, the girls could work through their fears and ease back into

Shawnna’s house over time, starting with supervised visitations. The investigator said his report

would be completed and sent out in the mail, but Eric never received the report and his attempts

to contact the investigator were unsuccessful. Eric stated, although he had not heard back from

DCFS, Shawnna kept texting him stating she was “cleared” and demanding to see the girls. Eric

testified Shawnna also continuously showed up at his house and would yell and say nasty things

about him, which continued until he filed for the order of protection.

¶ 25           Eric said he took the girls to weekly visits with Shawnna and would try to give

space to them. He was not always able to hear what was being said but agreed it appeared to be

much like S.W. described. He said he made the girls keep trying to meet with Shawnna when

they refused. Regarding the meeting at the coffee shop, Eric testified Shawnna yelled and blamed

him for the situation, causing the girls to become upset and start crying. Because the meetings

were getting progressively worse, he decided to give the girls a break from the meetings. When

asked if the girls had gotten counseling, Eric stated they were in individual counseling, but he

said it was “not helpful to the family dynamic.” He had attempted family counseling but was told

to wait, and Shawnna was not cooperative.

                                               - 10 -
¶ 26           Eric testified the current weekly meetings were not going well. He said since

September 21, 2021, Shawnna consistently badgered him at his home to see the girls, ringing the

doorbell and yelling through the door, and she texted him about S.W.’s behavior. He also said

the girls did not feel safe and are not healing. Eric stated he encourages the girls to talk to

Shawnna and disciplines them when they are disrespectful.

¶ 27           Shawnna testified, when she arrived home on September 21, 2021, Kadin was

there and started searching through her van. Shawnna told him there was not another tracker on

it. Kadin then went up the porch steps to the house and started pulling a safe out of the house.

Shawnna told him to leave the safe there because Brandon was going to get it. However, Kadin

said he did not care if he had to roll it, it was going to the curb. Shawnna said she begged Kadin

to stop. Once the safe reached the steps, Shawnna jumped on top of it to stop Kadin from pulling

it, but Kadin pulled Shawnna and the safe down the steps. Kadin next went into the garage,

where he snapped one of Brandon’s fishing poles over his knee and then came out with an air

compressor. Kadin started bashing the safe with the air compressor so hard parts of it broke,

including the safe’s battery, which was damaged and spilling acid.

¶ 28           Shawnna testified “things got really crazy then.” She said she felt nervous and

anxious, and she worried the battery acid being near the compressed air could cause an

explosion. She admitted it was an irrational worry. Taylor started to scream and cry, and people

started coming out of their homes to see what was going on. When the police arrived, Shawnna

was taken to one side of the yard and Kadin, Taylor, S.W., and E.W. to other areas for

questioning by the police.

¶ 29           Shawnna stated she remembered everything from September 21, 2021. She denied

hallucinating, but she admitted she said irrational things. She said she had never felt that way

                                                - 11 -
before and was “not of her baseline” at the time. She was more anxious than normal because

there was a lot going on. She had trouble sleeping during that time and had been sick with

COVID-19 in August, during which she had a fever for two weeks and lost 12 pounds.

¶ 30           Shawnna also denied having any of the other visions or episodes that S.W.

attributed to her. She said there was some truth to the things in the police report, but most of the

information was out of context. Shawnna denied seeing Satan in snake form. She testified S.W.

and E.W. kept using words like “stupid” and “butthole” around N.F. Shawnna told S.W. and

E.W. they needed to get back to church and act more consistently with what God would want

and not what the devil would want. She told the girls, “as a Christian, Satan is real.” Shawnna

said the conversation had been about being nice to each other and using appropriate words.

Shawnna testified she was concerned something might be in the safe after she heard a sound in

the basement that scared her, but it turned out to be a fallen ceiling tile. When asked about giving

away expensive earrings to a neighbor, Shawnna said she liked to do nice things for people and

the neighbor had helped her out recently. Shawnna admitted she sometimes would drive around

without a specific place to be. Regarding the incident with the funeral procession, Shawnna

denied she felt supernaturally drawn to a man in the casket of the funeral procession. Instead, she

told a police officer about a car ride in which she had passed a funeral procession and the name

of the funeral home stuck in her mind. She said nothing else occurred. Shawnna stated her home

was in disarray at the time because of renovations. It was clean and orderly before the

renovations and in good condition as of the date of the hearing.

¶ 31           Shawnna stated, on September 21, 2021, her potassium levels were dangerously

low, and she received six doses of potassium to attempt to bring the levels back up. She denied

taking any medication other than the potassium given by the hospital. She clarified the other

                                                - 12 -
medications were “standing orders, not medications that she had taken.” Shawnna testified her

primary doctor monitored her potassium levels very carefully after she left the hospital. There

was a significant drop in her potassium levels about a week later. Shawnna started taking

potassium supplements daily until her appetite started to resume and she started gaining weight

again, at which point the potassium levels were consistently stable and the supplements were

discontinued.

¶ 32            Shawnna said she previously had a problem with low potassium about eight years

ago. She had been very sick, and her potassium levels dropped after the illness. Shawnna’s chest

got very tight and heavy, and she felt like she was having a heart attack. She went to the

emergency room, where she was given potassium supplements and released. She said her

potassium levels were even lower on September 21, 2021, and the symptoms manifested

differently this time. She knew she did not feel right, but she also did not realize her body was in

a medical crisis, or she would have sought treatment.

¶ 33            Shawnna stayed with her mother after her release so she could stay with N.F. until

she met with DCFS. Shawnna had a mental-health evaluation in June 2022, and she did not

receive any diagnosis of mental illness or recommendations for treatment. The bystander’s report

indicates the written report of evaluation was not allowed into evidence based on Eric’s previous

motion in limine.

¶ 34            Regarding Brandon, Shawnna testified he was not physically abusive. She

suspected Brandon was using steroids, and she previously demanded he open the safe to prove

there were no drugs on her property. When steroids were found inside, Shawnna made him leave

with the steroids immediately.

                                               - 13 -
¶ 35           When asked about allegations Shawnna had continuously texted Eric demanding

to see the girls and went to his house repeatedly, she testified the DCFS caseworker told her it

was fine for N.F. to stay with her at home alone and confirmed she was free to resume the court-

ordered parenting plan for S.W. and E.W. However, Eric refused and said DCFS told him she

could not see them. Shawnna texted the DCFS caseworker to inform him Eric was continuing to

withhold visitation, and the DCFS caseworker stated he did not have anything to do with the

visitation at that point. A motion by Eric’s counsel to strike that statement as nonresponsive was

denied.

¶ 36           Shawnna stated she attempted to pick up the girls at Eric’s house only on her

parenting time, and she always texted him in advance that she would be there to pick them up.

Shawnna stated most of the time nobody was there, or nobody would answer the door. Shawnna

would ring the doorbell, but she denied screaming for the girls to come with her.

¶ 37           Shawnna testified when visitation occurred at the coffee shop, Eric arrived with a

new girlfriend, which she felt was inappropriate. Shawnna said it upset her because S.W. and

E.W. “were putting on a big show for the girlfriend” by ignoring her. Shawnna asked the girls to

come with her and N.F. outside so they could spend some time together, and they refused. S.W.

called Shawnna by her first name and said she and E.W. did not feel safe and they hated her and

never wanted to see her again. S.W. said Shawnna was a monster, crazy, a horrible mom, and

that she was going to live with Eric. Shawnna testified Eric put his arm around S.W. “very

arrogantly” and said, “I understand, I understand.” Shawnna was irritated by Eric’s actions and

asked him, “What is it that he understands? He understands that it is okay for a child to call her

mom by her first name and say she hates her and does not love her and act disrespectful, and that

                                               - 14 -
is okay?” Shawnna said Eric did not comment, and E.W. “took off walking away and crying.”

Shawnna and N.F. then left.

¶ 38           Regarding the current weekly visitation, Shawnna testified she did not recognize

the behaviors of her children. Shawnna stated the girls were very hateful towards her and made a

lot of comments about Shawnna being in a relationship with Brandon. However, according to

Shawnna, Brandon “had been gone” for 10 months at the time of the September 21, 2021,

incident, and they had not been together for 1.5 years at the time of the hearing on the order of

protection. Shawnna stated she does meet with him in public so he can spend time with N.F.

Shawnna testified she attends the girls’ extracurricular activities and games and then leaves

following, not causing any issues.

¶ 39           On June 27, 2022, the trial court declined to extend the order of protection. The

court stated the situation was the result of a medical condition. The court further stated Kadin

acted like a fool on September 21, 2021, and scared the girls likely just as much if not more than

Shawnna had. The court further commented it was reprehensible for one parent to allow children

to show disrespect to the other parent, and it was even more reprehensible that the basis for

allowing the disrespect was to take advantage of a medical condition. The court continued the

matter for further consideration.

¶ 40           On August 23, 2022, the trial court denied the petition for an order of protection.

The court noted the Act provides for the issuance of an order of protection if the court finds

abuse, and it defines abuse to mean “physical abuse, harassment, intimidation of a dependent,

interference with personal liberty or willful deprivation but does not include reasonable direction

of a minor child by a parent or person in loco parentis.” The court did not find any evidence of

physical abuse or acts otherwise meeting the definition of abuse.

                                               - 15 -
¶ 41           The trial court further stated harassment was defined as “knowing conduct which

is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the circumstances; would cause

a reasonable person emotional distress; and does cause emotional distress.” The court found

Shawnna’s conduct was not knowing because it resulted from her medical condition. The court

stated the medical condition caused her to act inconsistently with her usual manner of behavior.

Further, once the medical problem was addressed, any need for an order of protection was

eliminated because Shawnna no longer posed a threat to act in such a manner.

¶ 42           The trial court acknowledged Shawnna’s behavior was bizarre and erratic, and it

was clearly frightening to the girls. However, the court repeated the behavior flowed from a

medical condition, low potassium, over which Shawnna had no control. The judge stated he had

a family member who was oxygen-deprived, which caused hallucinations. Upon receiving

oxygen, the family member’s behavior returned to normal. The bystander’s report does not note

any objection to that statement. The court further found Kadin, by his own admission, reacted

poorly on September 21, 2021, and did as much if not more to inflame the situation and upset the

girls than anything Shawnna did on that day. The court denied Eric’s motion for leave to amend

the petition to allow for modification of child support.

¶ 43           This appeal followed.

¶ 44                                      II. ANALYSIS

¶ 45           On appeal, Eric contends the trial court’s determination denying a plenary order

of protection was against the manifest weight of the evidence. He argues the court erred in

determining Shawnna’s conduct was not abuse, harassment, or intimidation of a dependent under

the Act. He also argues the court erred in considering nonresponsive or hearsay evidence and by

relying on irrelevant personal experience.

                                               - 16 -
¶ 46           We note this case has been designated as accelerated pursuant to Illinois Supreme

Court Rule 311 (eff. July 1, 2018). Rule 311 states in relevant part that, “[e]xcept for good cause

shown, the appellate court shall issue its decision within 150 days after the filing of the notice of

appeal.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 311(a)(5) (eff. July 1, 2018). Here, petitioner’s notice of appeal was filed

on September 23, 2022. As a result, a disposition would otherwise be required by February 19,

2023. That filing deadline has passed. However, respondent requested, and was granted, separate

extensions of time to file a brief. Respondent’s brief was filed on December 20, 2022, and his

reply brief was not filed until January 17, 2023. Given ’respondent’s motions, we conclude good

cause exists for issuing this decision after the 150-day deadline.

¶ 47           A. Forfeited Issues of Hearsay and Reliance on Personal Experience

¶ 48           We first note Eric has forfeited his arguments concerning nonresponsive or

hearsay evidence and also his argument the trial court erred by relying on personal experience

when it denied the petition for an order of protection.

¶ 49           In his brief on appeal, Eric failed to provide any legal argument or citation to

authority for his argument concerning hearsay and the trial court’s statements about personal

experience. Instead, he notes various objections made at trial, includes portions of testimony not

objected to, and then simply asserts in one sentence, “the above ruling appear [sic] arbitrary, and

certainly affected the outcome of the case.” “[T]he failure to cite legal authority in the argument

section of a party’s brief forfeits the issue for review.” In re Marriage of Parr, 345 Ill. App. 3d

371, 380, 802 N.E.2d 393, 401 (2003). Further, while Eric notes various times hearsay objections

were overruled, the bystander’s report does not show there were objections to some of the

testimony he contends was problematic. In particular, he has not shown an objection to the

court’s statement based on personal experience. “Where a party fails to make an appropriate

                                                - 17 -
objection in the court below, he or she has failed to preserve the question for review and the

issue is [forfeited].” In re April C., 326 Ill. App. 3d 225, 242, 760 N.E. 2d 85, 98 (2001).

Accordingly, we find those arguments forfeited.

¶ 50                                 B. Application of the Act.

¶ 51           Eric next contends the trial court’s denial of the plenary order of protection was

against the manifest weight of the evidence because Shawnna’s behavior constituted abuse,

harassment, and intimidation of a minor under the Act and, applying the purpose of the Act, a

plenary order of protection was necessary to prevent further harm or abuse.

¶ 52           The Act provides for the entry of (1) an emergency order of protection (750 ILCS

60/217 (West 2020)), (2) a 30-day interim order of protection (750 ILCS 60/218 (West 2020)),

and (3) a plenary order of protection lasting up to two years (750 ILCS 60/219 (West 2020)). If

the trial court finds a petitioner has been abused by a family or household member, an order of

protection prohibiting the abuse shall issue. 750 ILCS 60/214(a) (West 2020).

¶ 53           The primary purpose of the Act is to aid victims of domestic violence and to

prevent future violence. See Radke ex rel. Radke v. Radke, 349 Ill. App. 3d 264, 268, 812 N.E.2d

9, 13 (2004). The “central inquiry” in such a proceeding is “whether the petitioner has been

abused,” which involves “an issue of fact that must be proven by a preponderance of the

evidence.” Best v. Best, 223 Ill. 2d 342, 348, 860 N.E.2d 240, 244 (2006). “Abuse” is defined as

“physical abuse, harassment, intimidation of a dependent, interference with personal liberty[,] or

willful deprivation.” 750 ILCS 60/103(1) (West 2020). “Harassment,” in turn, means “knowing

conduct which is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the

circumstances; would cause a reasonable person emotional distress; and does cause emotional

distress to the petitioner.” 750 ILCS 60/103(7) (West 2020). “Intimidation of a dependent” is

                                               - 18 -
defined as “subjecting a person who is dependent because of age, health or disability to

participation in or the witnessing of: physical force against another or physical confinement or

restraint of another which constitutes physical abuse *** regardless of whether the abused person

is a family or household member.” 750 ILCS 60/103(10) (West 2020).

¶ 54           The Act requires a trial court, in determining whether to grant a specific remedy,

to consider relevant factors that include, but are not limited to, the nature, frequency, severity,

pattern, and consequences of the past abuse, and the likelihood of danger of future abuse,

neglect, or exploitation. 750 ILCS 60/214(c)(1)(i) (West 2020).

¶ 55           This court has previously reviewed a trial court’s findings concerning an order of

protection for an abuse of discretion. Stapp v. Jansen, 2013 IL App (4th) 120513, ¶ 16, 988

N.E.2d 234, 237-38 (citing Lutz v. Lutz, 313 Ill. App. 3d 286, 289, 728 N.E.2d 1234, 1237

(2000)). However, our supreme court has since clarified such findings should be reviewed under

the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard of review. See Best, 223 Ill. 2d at 349-50. “ ‘A

finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence only if the opposite conclusion is clearly

evident or where a decision is unreasonable, arbitrary, and not based on any evidence.’ ” Stapp,

2013 IL App (4th) 120513, ¶ 16 (quoting Quinlan v. Stouffe, 355 Ill. App. 3d 830, 836, 823

N.E.2d 597, 602 (2005)).

¶ 56           Here, the trial court’s determination was not against the manifest weight of the

evidence. The court found no abuse occurred. While Shawnna’s conduct certainly scared the

girls, the court, after hearing the evidence and observing the witnesses, found no physical abuse

occurred and declined to find harassment or other forms of abuse because Shawnna’s conduct

was not knowing. In particular, the court specifically court found Shawnna’s behavior was

caused by a medical condition, low potassium, which had resolved. Thus, her behavior was not

                                                - 19 -
intentional, knowing, or likely to recur. That finding was supported by the medical reports and

Shawnna’s testimony. Further the record supports the determination Shawnna’s erratic behavior

was limited to a narrow time in 2021. Accordingly, even if abuse, harassment, or intimidation of

a dependent were found, under the Act, the nature, frequency, severity, and pattern of the

behavior was limited, and the likelihood of future abuse was low. Under those circumstances, the

court did not err in finding Eric failed to show the necessity of continuing the interim order of

protection or entering a plenary order of protection.

¶ 57            Eric takes issue with the trial court’s findings, noting Shawnna’s irrational

behavior on multiple occasions on and before September 21, 2021, that scared the girls. He

argues her conduct was reckless and created an immediate risk of physical harm. He also argues

Shawnna harassed him and the girls because she “should have known” her conduct would not

accomplish a reasonable purpose and would cause a reasonable person emotional distress.

However, the Act specifically requires “knowing conduct” to find harassment. 750 ILCS

60/103(7) (West 2020). As noted, the court specifically found Shawnna’s behavior was

unknowing and unintentional, caused by a temporary medical issue that had since resolved. Any

other instances of arguable abuse, such as intimidation of a dependent, were also limited and no

longer at issue.

¶ 58            To reverse based on Eric’s arguments, we would be required to disregard the

evidence supporting the trial court’s determination. We will not do so. “We defer to the trial

court as the finder of fact because it is in the best position to observe the conduct and demeanor

of the parties and witnesses.” Stapp, 2013 IL App (4th) 120513, ¶ 17 (citing Best, 223 Ill. 2d at

350). “Where a conflict in the witnesses’ testimony exists, a reviewing court will not substitute

its judgment for that of the trier of fact, whose function it is to determine the credibility of the

                                                 - 20 -
witnesses’ testimony and the inferences to be drawn therefrom.” Stapp, 2013 IL App (4th)

120513, ¶ 17 (citing Best, 223 Ill. 2d at 350-51). “A reviewing court should not overturn a trial

court’s finding of fact merely because it might have reached a different decision.” Stapp, 2013 IL

App (4th) 120513, ¶ 17.

¶ 59           We are not in a position to observe the witnesses and reassess their credibility

and, based on the evidence presented in the bystander’s report, we find the trial court’s ruling

was reasonable. We also disagree the cases Eric relies on would require us to find otherwise, as

they are distinguishable or inapplicable. See People v. Holtorf, 397 Ill. App. 3d 805, 811, 922

N.E.2d 1173, 1178 (2010) (finding knowingly and routinely shoplifting with children or leaving

them in a running car while shoplifting constituted abuse); In re T.H., 354 Ill. App. 3d 301, 310

820 N.E.2d 977, 985-96 (2004) (finding multiple instances of abuse when child’s mother

involved the child in acts of prostitution and had the child beg for money and steal food),

overruled on other grounds by Best, 223 Ill. 2d at 350; People v. Reynolds, 302 Ill. App. 3d 722,

728, 706 N.E.2d 49, 53 (1999) (requiring intentional acts to find harassment occurred). Here, the

opposite conclusion of the trial court is not clearly evident, and its decision was not

unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on any evidence. Stapp, 2013 IL App (4th) 120513, ¶ 16.

Accordingly, it was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

¶ 60                                    III. CONCLUSION

¶ 61           The trial court’s denial of the petition for an order of protection was not against

the manifest weight of the evidence. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, we affirm.

¶ 62           Affirmed.

                                                - 21 -