Court Opinion

ID: 8423927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 00:07:29.816544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:28.309185
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.*
Jesus Coronado-Pineda appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. For the first time on appeal, CoronadoPineda argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Coronado-Pineda acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.