Court Opinion

ID: 8416884
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:53:16.331918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:17.062343
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Carlos Calderon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Calderon v. Sondervan, No. CA-02-2183-AW (D.Md. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.