Court Opinion

ID: 8480997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 19:03:06.135906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.587000
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
The district court properly dismissed Patsy N. Sakuma’s (“Sakuma”) action as moot because her condominium had been sold and there was no longer a controversy as to which effective relief could be granted. See Vill. of Gambell v. Babbitt, 999 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir.1993).
*287Sakuma’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.