Court Opinion

ID: 1022842
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:28:51.866403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:52.805876
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-7930

ANTHONY BERNARD BURNSIDE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

E. GORE, Major

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:06-cv-02207)

Submitted: June 15, 2007                      Decided:   June 20, 2007

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Bernard Burnside, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Anthony Bernard Burnside appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.        We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.        Burnside v.

Gore, No. 6:06-cv-02207 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006).        We dispense with

oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -