Court Opinion

ID: 1061532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 19:05:45.626514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:43:52.921811
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner

CHARLIE BELLFLEUR YAMBA TAKA
                                                                          MEMORANDUM OPINION *
v.      Record No. 1743-11-4                                                  PER CURIAM
                                                                              MAY 15, 2012
ALFRED SCOTT McLAREN, JR.

                      FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STAFFORD COUNTY
                                   Charles S. Sharp, Judge

                  (Abu Bakarr Kalokoh, on brief), for appellant.

                  (Peter M. Fitzner; Matthews, Snider & Fitzner, on brief), for
                  appellee.

        Charlie Bellfleur Yamba Taka (wife) appeals from the final order of her divorce from Alfred

Scott McLaren, Jr. (husband). Wife argues the trial court abused its discretion in granting primary

residential custody of the parties’ minor child to husband without considering all the factors

required by Code § 20-124.3. Wife also contends the trial court abused its discretion in failing to

consider all the factors required by Code § 20-107.1 in determining spousal support. 1

        Wife did not file a transcript or written statement of facts pertaining to the evidence

presented in the trial court. See Rule 5A:8 (stating that “[t]he transcript of any proceeding is a part

of the record when it is filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within 60 days after entry of

        *
            Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
        1
          Wife acknowledges that she did not raise either issue in the trial court, but asks this
Court to invoke the ends of justice exception to Rule 5A:18 and consider the assignments of
error on appeal. Because we summarily affirm the trial court’s decision without consideration of
the assignments of error, we need not consider whether the ends of justice exception is applicable
in this instance.
the final judgment”). The appellate record contains only an excerpt of the transcript reflecting the

trial court’s ruling.

        We conclude that a transcript or written statement of facts of the evidence is indispensable to

a determination of the assignments of error raised on appeal. See Anderson v. Commonwealth, 13

Va. App. 506, 508-09, 413 S.E.2d 75, 76-77 (1992); Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96,

99-100, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). We further conclude that this defect is significant. See Jay

v. Commonwealth, 275 Va. 510, 520, 659 S.E.2d 311, 317 (2008) (“[T]he Court of Appeals

should . . . consider whether any failure to strictly adhere to the requirements of [the Rules of

Court] is insignificant.”). Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of the trial court.2 See

Rule 5A:27.

                                                                                            Affirmed.

        2
         We deny husband’s request for an award of attorney’s fees incurred in the process of
this appeal.
                                            -2-