Court Opinion

ID: 2923000
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:25:41.205182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:07.349039
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-511-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE: JOEL GALARZA 

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and 

Verified Emergency Motion to Stay Further Proceedings

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, Joel Galarza, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on September 14, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition
for writ of mandamus with appendix and record, is of the opinion that relator has not
shown himself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
	Furthermore, relator's verified emergency motion to stay further proceedings
filed on September 14, 2006, is also denied.

								PER CURIAM

Justice Garza not participating.

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 14th day of September, 2006.
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).