Court Opinion

ID: 6639396
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:44:11.789568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:59:11.212534
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Through lack of proper timbering, the roof of the mine where they were working so collapsed that Mullins Bros, were unable to continue their contract with the mining company, by which they were to receive a ton price for removing the pillars in No. 2 mine and delivering the coal on track above ground. -They were to set the timbers; the company was to furnish them. They had judgment in this suit for their damages for the loss of their contract. The substantial trial dispute was whether the breach was theirs in not setting, or the company’s in not furnishing, the necessary and fit timbers. This question was fairly submitted, and found for plaintiffs.
The only error saved and assigned is that the court refused to treat the timber-furnishing duty as governed by Kentucky Statutes, § 2726—5, which provides that the workmen must give the mine foreman certain specific notice as to timbers. This statute declares the duties of the mine operator, by nonperformance of which he would become subject to the penalties imposed, and it affects the rights of the miners in ease of accident. It does not directly touch the relations between a general operator and a subcontractor who employs Ms own workmen, and it should not be imported into a contract between them, which undertook to cover that subject. It was the company’s contract duty to furnish, even without notice, timbers which it knew were necessary, and in its pleadings it had claimed that it had furnished all proper timbers, but plaintiffs had failed to set them.
Judgment is affirmed.