Court Opinion

ID: 4060469
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 19:49:03.683375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:00.216176
License: Public Domain

In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                        Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
                                 ________________________

                                      No. 07-15-00246-CR
                                      No. 07-15-00286-CR
                                 ________________________

                               RICKY DAN ALLEE, APPELLANT

                                                  V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                             On Appeal from the 47th District Court
                                     Randall County, Texas
                   Trial Court No. 17,197-A; Honorable Dan Schaap, Presiding

                                          October 16, 2015

          ORDER ON COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW
      AND ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND ON INDIGENCY

                     Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

       Appellant, Ricky Dan Allee, was charged with possession of a controlled

substance in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 in a drug-free zone1

       1
          TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(d) (West 2010). The offense is a second degree
felony with punishment increased by five years when committed in a drug-free zone. Id. at § 481.134(c).
and possession of marihuana in an amount of five pounds or less but more than four

ounces in a drug free-zone.2 In exchange for pleas of guilty, the trial court placed

Appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision.                  The State subsequently

moved to adjudicate Appellant guilty of both offenses for violating the conditions of

community supervision. The trial court granted the State’s motion and entered a finding

of guilt as to each offense. Punishment was assessed at eight years confinement and a

$1,500 fine as to the possession of controlled substance case and eight years

confinement as to the possession of marihuana case.

        Appellant retained counsel to pursue these appeals. Pending before this court is

counsel’s Motion to Withdraw in which he represents that Appellant has failed to pay his

agreed-upon fee and did not make a deposit for payment of the reporter’s record.3

Pursuant to Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted and he is hereby relieved as Appellant’s appellate attorney of

record.

        By the motion to withdraw, counsel further requests that new counsel be

appointed to represent Appellant in this appeal “because he is indigent and cannot

afford to employ counsel.” Typically, such a request comes from an appellant—not his

attorney. Furthermore, the trial court has the authority to appoint counsel for eligible

indigent defendants for appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(d)(1) (West

        2
          TEX. HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.121(b)(3) (West 2010). The offense is a state jail
felony with punishment increased to that of a third degree felony when committed in a drug-free zone. Id.
at § 481.134(d).
        3
          As a result of non-payment of the reporter’s record, by letter dated September 29, 2015, the
reporter’s record was deemed filed and the deadline for filing Appellant’s brief was set for October 29,
2015. By virtue of this order, that deadline is suspended.

                                                   2
Supp. 2014). Some of the factors the trial court may consider in determining indigency

include a defendant’s income, source of income, assets, property owned, outstanding

obligations, necessary expenses, the number and ages of dependents, and spousal

income that may be available. Id. at art. 26.04(m). Consequently, we now abate this

appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

      Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to

immediately determine the following:

      1.     whether Appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal; and

      2.     whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel to pursue

             this appeal.

Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue the appeal and the trial

court determines he is entitled to appointed counsel, the name, address, telephone

number, email address, and state bar number of appointed counsel shall be provided to

the clerk of this court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact and conclusions of

law, and shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any necessary orders to be included

in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the clerk of this court by November 20,

2015. If new counsel is appointed to represent Appellant, his brief shall be due thirty

days following the date of appointment.

      Should the trial court determine that Appellant is not indigent, Appellant may

proceed pro se in this appeal or retain new appellate counsel to prosecute this appeal.

                                            3
Appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days from the date the supplemental clerk’s record is

filed with the clerk of this court.

       It is so ordered.

                                                 Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                             4