Court Opinion

ID: 9392513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-05 07:09:44.880699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:46.292878
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-23-00073-CV
                               __________________

                         JUAN E. HURTADO, Appellant

                                         V.

                             PATTI JONES, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 284th District Court
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 17-07-09255-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Juan E. Hurtado filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s February

8, 2023 Order Granting Receiver’s Emergency Motion Seeking the Deposit of Funds

into the Court’s Registry. The Clerk of the Court notified the parties that it appears

the order being appealed is neither a final judgment nor an order that may be

appealed through an accelerated appeal. The Clerk’s notice warned the parties that

the Court would dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless we received a

response that established our jurisdiction over the appeal. Neither party responded

                                          1
in writing by March 22, 2023, as required by the Clerk’s notice. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                            PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 3, 2023
Opinion Delivered May 4, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

                                          2