Court Opinion

ID: 997784
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:01:53.345158+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:08.023221
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7597

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DINO GILES,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-94-212-WMN, CA-97-4021-WMN)

Submitted:    January 19, 1999          Decided:    February 10, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dino Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dino Giles seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Giles, Nos. CR-94-212-WMN; CA-

97-4021-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2