Court Opinion

ID: 1875914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:41:45.181866+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:00.652637
License: Public Domain

260 S.W.3d 426 (2008)
Ronald WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90252.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
August 12, 2008.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen. Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW and KURT S. ODENWALD, JJ.
Prior report: 209 S.W.3d 10.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Ronald Williams, appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion *427 would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order and judgment denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).