Court Opinion

ID: 3114424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:24:15.747863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:55.992316
License: Public Domain

Jfotirtlj Court of Appeals'
                                     %>i\\\ fintanio,

                                          October 3. 2013

                                        No. 04-13-00194-CV

                                           Eusebio Vejil,
                                             Appellant

                                                 v.

                                            Rosita Vejil,
                                              Appellee

                                 Trial Court Case No. 2G12-CI-20I86

                                          ORDER

       The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges
have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and
tactual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 39.X. Therefore, all requests for oral
argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON I1R1KFS submission on November 6,
2013. lo the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez.       All
parlies will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. Api\ P.
48.

       Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that
oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues
presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. A!1!1. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)
days from the dale of this order.

       It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2013.

                                                             Catherine Stone. Chief Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this October 3. 2013.

                                                              E-ilh H./lottk. Clerk