Court Opinion

ID: 9909457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-13 16:01:29.477712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:29.009192
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-2126     Document: 010110967861       Date Filed: 12/13/2023    Page: 1
                                                                                   FILED
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                        December 13, 2023
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-2126
                                                    (D.C. No. 2:22-CR-01378-KG-1)
  MARK ANTHONY CALZADA,                                        (D. N.M.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                          _________________________________

 Before PHILLIPS, KELLY, and CARSON, Circuit Judges.
                    _________________________________

       Mark Anthony Calzada pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm and ammunition

 as a felon. He received a 108-month sentence. He appeals even though his plea

 agreement contained an appeal waiver. The government moves to enforce the

 waiver. Mr. Calzada concedes that, on this record, he cannot “show that enforcement

 of the waiver is not warranted.” Resp. at 1.

       Based on the parties’ positions and our independent review of the record, we

 grant the government’s motion. We dismiss this appeal. This dismissal is without

 prejudice to any rights under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 that survive the plea agreement.

                                             Entered for the Court
                                             Per Curiam

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.