Court Opinion

ID: 9930417
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-06 21:00:44.392618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:33.247420
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6539      Doc: 7        Filed: 02/05/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6539

        VENTURA GARCIA, a/k/a Ventura Garcia Olvera,

                            Petitioner - Appellant,

                     v.

        WARDEN JANSON,

                            Respondent - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:23-cv-01619-JFA)

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                       Decided: February 5, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Ventura Garcia, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6539         Doc: 7     Filed: 02/05/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Ventura Garcia, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the

        recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Garcia’s 28

        U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Our review of the record confirms the district court’s holding that

        Garcia failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his § 2241 petition and

        failed to establish that exhaustion of such remedies should be excused. Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s order. Garcia v. Janson, No. 8:23-cv-01619-JFA (D.S.C.

        May 19, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

        are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2