Court Opinion

ID: 8211812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-05 06:10:37.961746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:06.141462
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                   No. 06-22-00090-CR

            RICHARD LYNN KEY, Appellant

                            V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

         On Appeal from the 52nd District Court
                Coryell County, Texas
              Trial Court No. 21-26855

      Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.
                                              ORDER

           Richard Lynn Key has appealed from his conviction of the manufacture or delivery of a

controlled substance and the resulting fifty-year sentence. On September 14, 2022, the court

reporter advised this Court and the parties to this appeal that, due to a malfunction of her

stenographic machine, the sentencing hearing was not saved to the SD card or to the machine

memory. As a result, the reporter has been unable to produce the sentencing hearing portion of

the reporter’s record. The court reporter has represented to this Court and to the parties that the

sentencing hearing consisted of the trial court’s “ruling on guilt/innocence, attorneys’ arguments

and the Court’s ruling on punishment.”

           After learning that the sentencing portion of the reporter’s record was not available for

transcription, Key filed a motion to abate this appeal to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing

in accordance with Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(f).

           Because this case involves issues regarding the existence and extent of a reporter’s

record, we hereby abate this matter to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant

to Rule 34.6(f) to determine:

           (1)    if the appellant has timely requested a reporter’s record;

           (2)    if, without the appellant’s fault, a significant exhibit or a significant
           portion of the court reporter’s notes and records has been lost or destroyed or—if
           the proceedings were electronically recorded—a significant portion of the
           recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible;

           (3)    if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record . . . is
           necessary to the appeal’s resolution; and

                                                    2
          (4)    if the lost, destroyed or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record cannot be
          replaced by agreement of the parties . . . .

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

          We instruct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing within fifteen days of the

date of this order and to enter findings regarding the following:

          1.     Precisely what portions of the record, if any, are non-existent, lost, destroyed, or

inaudible.

          2.     For each portion of the reporter’s record that is determined to be non-existent,

lost, destroyed, or inaudible, if any, the trial court is instructed to take evidence on and enter

findings regarding each of the four factors set out in Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure and to enter recommendations regarding whether the appellant is entitled to a new trial

as a result of the lost or destroyed exhibit or portion of the record.

          3.     We also request that the trial court make any additional findings that it believes

will be helpful to this Court in fully and finally resolving all issues related to the record in this

matter.

          The trial court’s findings, as set forth above, shall be entered into the record of the case

and filed with this Court as a supplemental clerk’s record within ten days of the date of the

hearing. The reporter’s record of the hearing and any certified corrections to the reporter’s

record under Rule 34.6(e)(2) shall be filed in the form of a supplemental reporter’s records

within ten days of the date of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(2).

                                                   3
       Our jurisdiction over this case will automatically resume upon our recipt of the

supplemental record contemplated by this order. We withdraw Key’s current briefing deadline

and will establish a new briefing schedule once the case is returned to our jurisdiction.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      BY THE COURT

Date: September 28, 2022

                                                 4