Court Opinion

ID: 9964986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-01 15:03:33.205425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:51.946575
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                          Opinion filed May 1, 2024.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1507
                       Lower Tribunal No. 18-29043
                          ________________

                       Robert P. Charbonneau,
                         Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

                                     vs.

                        Patricia Charbonneau,
                         Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby
Cynamon, Judge.

      Jam Law PLLC, and Jason A. Martorella (Fort Myers), for
appellant/cross-appellee.

      Lauri Waldman Ross, P.A., and Lauri Waldman Ross; Raquel A.
Rodriguez & Associates, and Raquel A. Rodriguez, for appellee/cross-
appellant.

Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Robert Charbonneau (“Former Husband”) appeals from a final

judgment of dissolution, specifically the amount of income imputed to the

Wife, the amount of alimony, maintenance of life insurance to secure alimony

and the disposition of an income tax refund. Patricia Charbonneau (“Former

Wife”) cross-appeals the trial court’s refusal to clarify the final judgment to

allocate responsibility for mortgage payments and included expenses, and

to make necessary adjustments of credits and setoffs.

      We affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects. As to the

Former Wife’s cross-appeal, we similarly affirm. The Former Wife benefitted

from occupancy of the marital home from the date of the final judgment until

sale of the marital home. The marital home, and the Former Wife’s ability to

remain in residency until its sale, are benefits derived from a marital asset to

which both parties held equal interest. No clarification of the parties’ post-

sale credits is necessary.

      Affirmed.

                                       2