Court Opinion

ID: 7216236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 01:44:55.877847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:17:01.249666
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Frederick A. Grundy appeals the district court’s judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Grundy’s supervised release. Grundy’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw based on counsel’s failure to discover any arguable issues for review. Grundy did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues.
We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.