Court Opinion

ID: 2963017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:04:59.67224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:27.431290
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 94-1465                                          WILLIAM V. FERGUSON, JR.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                     PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                     ____________________                              and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
                                          _____________                                 ___________________               William V. Ferguson, Jr. on brief pro se.
               ________________________                                  __________________                                  __________________

                 Per Curiam.   Pro se plaintiff  William Ferguson appeals
                 __________    ___ __            the dismissal of his third civil rights complaint against the            present defendants.   Having thoroughly  reviewed the  record            and  Ferguson's  brief  on  appeal,  we  are  persuaded  that            Ferguson's  complaint  was  properly  dismissed  as frivolous            within  the meaning of 28 U.S.C.   1915(d).  Accordingly, the            judgment of the district court is affirmed.   See Local  Rule
                                              _________   ___            27.1.                                         -2-