Court Opinion

ID: 8673607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:58:22.749742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.847832
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Howard Charles Hudson appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:93-cr-00156-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 25 & entered Apr. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.