Court Opinion

ID: 9513448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:35:42.679186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:51.821406
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, Justice,
concurring in the result.
[¶ 44] I write separately to note in Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), the defendant made incriminating admissions in the initial interview. Here, there were none. Indeed, the sexual molestation — the subject of this case — was not an issue in the first interview, which occurred after Syvertson’s arrest on unrelated charges.
[¶ 45] Dale V. Sandstrom