Court Opinion

ID: 3026277
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 22:35:28.740796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:18.148507
License: Public Domain

OPINION
 

  PER CURIAM.
 

  Michael Shemonsky appeals the District Court’s order denying his motions to proceed
  
   in forma pauperis
  
  on appeal. Shemonsky filed notices of appeal from the District Court’s order deeming his appeals from three Bankruptcy Court orders withdrawn. These appeals were docketed at C.A. Nos. 07-2784, 07-2790, and 07-2791. Shemonsky filed motions to proceed
  
   in forma pauperis
  
  in the District Court for each appeal. By order entered July 10, 2007, the District Court denied the motions without prejudice to Shemonsky filing a motion to proceed
  
   informa pauperis
  
  with this Court. Shemonsky then filed notices of appeal from the District Court’s July 10, 2007 order which were docketed at C.A. Nos. 07-3093, 07-3104, and 07-3105.
 

  By order entered July 18, 2007, the Clerk granted Shemonsky’s motions to proceed
  
   in forma pauperis
  
  in the appeals at C.A. Nos. 07-2784, 07-2790, and 07-2971. Because Shemonsky has now been granted the relief he sought in the District Court, the appeals at C.A. Nos. 07-3093, 07-3104, and 07-3105 are moot. Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeals.