Court Opinion

ID: 9829562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:25:59.655906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:02.991710
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The reversal of the judgment of the lower court Was not intended to set aside the judgment obtained by appellants against the defendant Sioux Oil & Refining Company. That *431defendant did not appeal from the judgment against it, and that portion of the judgment is not disturbed by the reversal.
The appellant interveners MeVittie, Schroek, Page, and Dwyer did not intervene herein until December 5, 1928, Their demands, were then barred by limitation, and the exception of the Banner Company to that effect should have been sustained as to those interveners. We perhaps erred in stating that none of the appellants were parties to the foreclosure suit filed May 15,1924, in the district court of Stephens county. We find that W. N. Reddick and Herman Rein-hold were parties plaintiff to that suit. It may be these are the same parties as the appellant inter-veners W. A. Reddick and Herman Reinhold.
In the state of the pleadings we are not called upon to determine whát effect, if any, such joinder has upon the right of foreclosure here asserted by Reddick and Reinhold against the Banner Company. This is true for the reason that the pleading of the Banner Company presents no issue with respect to such joinder.