Court Opinion

ID: 9796689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 04:02:51.544844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:02.568983
License: Public Domain

BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge
(dissenting):
T8 I cannot say that this is a case of "manifest error," pursuant to rule 10(e) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Utah Supreme Court has described manifest error as error that is "obvious." State v. Menzies, 845 P.2d 220, 225 (Utah 1992). In my view, the jurisdictional error cited by TDM is not sufficiently obvious to warrant summary reversal.
T9 I would therefore deny the motion for summary reversal and defer deciding the Jurisdictional issue "until plenary presentation and consideration of the case." Utah R.App. P. 10(F).