Court Opinion

ID: 5543896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:54:57.493675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:52.809212
License: Public Domain

Dugro, J.
The general term of this court recently held in Pappenheim v. Railway Co., 7 N. Y. Supp. 679, that findings of fact such as appear in the decision of this case are in irreconcilable conflict. Adopting this as a proper conclusion, it seems that it is impossible, from the record before us, to say *425which of the conflicting findings is correct. The error sought to be remedied by the order appealed from is therefore judicial, and cannot be corrected after judgment upon a motion made at a term other than that at which the judgment was rendered. Rockwell v. Carpenter, 25 Hun, 529; McLean v. Stewart, 14 Hun, 472; Gardiner v. Schwab, 34 Hun, 583; Freem. Judgm. §§ 70, 101. The order should be reversed.