Court Opinion

ID: 1015973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:41:35.343046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:36.791055
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Michael J. Sindram appeals a district court order denying his motion to reconsider and vacate a 1990 order establishing a pre-filing review procedure. The district court denied the motion finding Sindram failed to articulate a reason as to why the 1990 order should be vacated. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Sindram v. Wallin,
  
  No. CA-90-800-1-FNS (D. Md. filed May 24, 2004; entered May 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED