Court Opinion

ID: 9947425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-04 20:03:17.770383+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:26.669158
License: Public Domain

Filed 3/4/24 P. v. Lindahl CA2/6

   NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         DIVISION SIX

 THE PEOPLE,                                                  2d Crim. No. B328533
                                                           (Super. Ct. No. 2021010288)
      Plaintiff and Respondent,                                 (Ventura County)

 v.

 BLAKE AARON LINDAHL,

      Defendant and Appellant.

      Blake Aaron Lindahl appeals an order revoking probation
and committing him to jail after he pleaded guilty to two counts
of grand theft. (Penal Code, § 487, subd. (a).)1 He received a
sixteen-month lower term on the first count and a consecutive
eight-month term on a second. The charges arose from

         1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless

stated otherwise.
appellant’s theft of electronics and other merchandise from a
Simi Valley Target store.2
      The court initially released appellant on a mental health
diversion but resumed criminal proceedings when he failed to
report to his program. He pleaded guilty and received a
suspended sentence and probation. Appellant twice violated the
terms of probation and failed to remand to serve jail time
imposed by the court.
      We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.
After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues.
We advised appellant on December 18, 2023 that he had 30 days
within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he
wished us to consider. We received no response.
      We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
appellant’s counsel fully complied with his responsibilities and
that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d
436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)
      The judgment is affirmed.
      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                     CODY, J.
We concur:

      GILBERT, P. J.                 YEGAN, J.

      2 The facts are derived from the probation report because

appellant pleaded guilty to the charges.

                                 2
                   Derek D. Malan, Judge
              Superior Court County of Ventura
               ______________________________

     Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

                              3