Court Opinion

ID: 4437491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-12 05:15:41.595437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:34.731210
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-90,197-01

                         EX PARTE TORRY JAMAL REED, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 41786-A-H-1 IN THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM GREGG COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                                 ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to 75 years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Reed

v. State, No. 06-17-00104-CR (Oct. 10, 2018, pet. ref’d).

        Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he provided

misleading advice and pressured Applicant into pleading guilty, so that the guilty plea was

involuntary; failed to call and discouraged two alibi witnesses; had a conflict of interest; and failed

to preserve several trial and pretrial errors.
                                                                                                        2

        The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending that this

application be denied. The court’s findings and conclusions rely in part on an affidavit filed by trial

counsel. However, no affidavit from counsel is in the record before this Court.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. If the trial court

has not already done so, the trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection.

Id.

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court has already entered findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. If appropriate, the trial court shall make any other findings of

fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s

claim for habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 60 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing trial

counsel’s affidavit and any other affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court
                                                                                                 3

reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any supplemental findings of fact and

conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 90 days of the date of this order. Any

extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 11, 2019
Do not publish