Court Opinion

ID: 8609577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 07:03:31.054828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.467752
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Heriberto Ambrocio Hernandez Castillo and his wife, Araeeli Lopez-Avalos, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).
Petitioners’ contention that the agency disregarded their evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not amount tó a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.