Court Opinion

ID: 7414754
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:34:56.321489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:15.324564
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.