Court Opinion

ID: 6252153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:18:36.861944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:26.975872
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
This appeal is from an order discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action was on a written instrument which contained a recital that the plaintiff, a stockholder of the company defendant, had advanced money to it to be repaid out of the first net earnings of the company and a promise to pay the principal out of the first net earnings and before any dividends were declared or paid and to pay interest quarterly. It is alleged in the statement of claim that the net earnings of the company have been more than sufficient to pay the obligation with interest thereon and that dividends have been declared and paid *519out of the net earnings. It is averred in the affidavit of defense that there have not been net earnings of the company since the date of the instrument on which suit is brought, sufficient to pay any part of plaintiff’s claim and that there have been no dividends paid out of net earnings at any time. This was a distinct and specific denial of the allegation of the plaintiff on which his right to recover was based and it was sufficient to prevent judgment.
The order is affirmed.