Court Opinion

ID: 9945476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-27 21:01:11.304307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:30.402347
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2159       Doc: 11        Filed: 02/26/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                                No. 23-2159

        CAROLINA LANDMARK REALTY, LLC,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      and

        WARREN SLOAN GOFORTH,

                             Third Party Defendant - Appellee,

                      v.

        VINCENT LINEBERGER,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00139-KDB-DCK)

        Submitted: February 22, 2024                                  Decided: February 26, 2024

        Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Vincent Lineberger, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2159      Doc: 11         Filed: 02/26/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Vincent Lineberger appeals the district court’s order remanding the action for lack

        of subject matter jurisdiction to the state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. ∗ We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

        order. Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC v. Lineberger, No. 5:23-cv-00139-KDB-DCK

        (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

               ∗
                 Because Lineberger also sought to invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1443 in removing this action
        to federal court, we may review the district court’s remand order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).

                                                     2