Court Opinion

ID: 9363599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-16 19:00:34.811497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:32.791226
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10589         Document: 00516611649             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/16/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10589
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 16, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Sofio Nieto, Jr.,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:21-CR-425-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Sofio Nieto, Jr., has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Nieto has not filed a response but has moved for appointment of new counsel.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10589      Document: 00516611649           Page: 2    Date Filed: 01/16/2023

                                     No. 22-10589

   That motion is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d
   901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.
          The record, however, reflects a clerical error in the written judgment.
   The written judgment states that Nieto is to serve a three-year term of
   supervised release.     Instead, at sentencing, the district court orally
   pronounced that Nieto would serve a one-year term of supervised release.
   Accordingly, we REMAND for the entry of a corrected written judgment in
   accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See Fed. R.
   Crim. P. 36; see also United States v. Illies, 805 F.3d 607, 610 (5th Cir. 2015).

                                          2