Court Opinion

ID: 319223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:55:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:42.448232
License: Public Domain

496 F.2d 1197
86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3056, 74 Lab.Cas.  P 10,149
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.MISSION RUBBER COMPANY, INC., Respondent.
No. 73-1703.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 19, 1974.

A. Bashir (argued), Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
A. Patrick Nagel (argued), Stephen C. Drummy, of Nagel, Regan & Davidson, Newport Beach, Cal., for respondent.
Before DUNIWAY the GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,1 District judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
The petitioning Board's decision and order are published at 202 N.L.R.B. No. 17, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 1801 (1973).  The Board's findings that Mission Rubber violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(1) and 158(a)(3), are supported by substantial evidence.  See NLRB v. Miller Redwood Co., 407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969).  Accordingly, the Board's order will be enforced.

1
 The Honorable Otto R. Skopil, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation