Court Opinion

ID: 5469998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:31:52.534351+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:11.410436
License: Public Domain

The order was affirmed at general term, and the following opinion delivered:
Rosekrans, J.
The statute in relation to the election of trustees or directors of corporations provides that any person or body corporate that may be aggrieved by or may complain of any election, or any proceeding, act or matter in or touching the same, may make application, on notice to those who are to be affected thereby, to the supreme court, to inquire into the cause and matter of complaint; and the court, upon hearing the parties, may establish the election complained of, or order a new election. (1 R. S. 603, marg., § 5.)
The Pioneer Paper Company was one of the parties which instituted the complaint in this case, and set forth in the affidavits all the proceedings relating to the election, *113including the offers to vote upon certain stock. The objections to the votes being received, and the rejection of such votes, as the grounds of complaint, I think the company had the right under the statute to be heard on its application for the puipose of establishing the election of its trustees who were declared elected, or to have'the election set aside and a new election ordered.
The joinder in the complaint of the trustees declared elected did not affect the rights of the company to institute the proceedings. I do not deem it necessary to determine whether the trustees declared elected could complain or be regarded as aggrieved by proceedings in which they were successful in every particular. The papers disclose the fact that the original stock ledger of this company, and the book of certificates of stock issued, containing merely the stubbs attached originally to the certificates issued, and upon which stubbs were entries of the names of the parties to whom the certificates were issued, the number of shares named in the certificates, and the dates of the certificates, were lost at the time of the election complained of, and could not be produced.' It also appears that after such loss, and just before the election, the company had obtained a new stock ledger upon which the secretary of the company had entered the names of the stockholders and the number of shares to which the stockholders were entitled, and that this book was produced at the election.
The entry in the book in relation to 19S shares of the stock of the company, which originally was issued to S. A. Parks & Co., was that the stock belonged to Coe S. Buchanan and Elisha Comstock. Eighty-five shares of the stock was at the time of the election represented by two certificates issued to S. A. Parks & Co., and 113 shares by certificates issued to Coe S. Buchanan alone, in December, 1859. This certificate was obtained by Buchanan upon a surrender of certificates to S. A. Parks & Co., and the stock was placed in his own name without the consent of Parks.
*114In June, 1863, Parks assigned his interest in the 198 shares of stock to Comstock; and in an action by Comstock against Buchanan and the Pioneer Paper Company, to set aside the transfer of the 113 shares to Buchanan, it was adjudged, on the 22d day of March, 1864, that the surrender of the certificates for the 113 shares of stock by Buchanan-, and the transfer of the stock to niinself and the issuing of scrip to himself therefor, were fraudulent and void, and that. Comstock was the owner of all Parks’ interest in said stock, subject to all equities between Parks and Buchanan in regard thereto, and that Comstock and Buchanan, since Parks made the transfer to Comstock, were joint owners of said stock, subject to such equities, and the Pioneer Paper Company were required by its officers to issue scrip for said stock to Buchanan and Comstock jointly. This judgment was presented at the time of the election, and, as Comstock and Buchanan did not agree as to the manner of voting on this stock, the vote was rejected. I do not see how the chairman of the meeting of stockholders could have decided otherwise in relation to this stock. The judgment was unreversed, and as it declared the ownership to be in Buchanan and Comstock jointly, it necessarily controlled the effect of the certificates which were declared void. The appeal from the judgment which Buchanan had taken had no effect upon it, except to stay its execution so far as it had not already been executed. (18 How. Pr. R. 124; 3 Barb. R. 194.)
It did not impair the effect of that part of .the judgment declaring Buchanan and Comstock joint owners of the stock. This adjudication was founded upon the assignment by Parks to Comstock; and as the 85 shares were claimed by the same assignment, such assignment was properly decided by the chairman of the meeting of stockholders to pass the title to one-half of those shares to Comstock, to the same extent as it passed to him the title to one-half of the 113 shares.
The assignment and judgment showed that Buchanan and *115Comstock were joint owners of the 198 shares of stock, and as Comstoek was in favor of the ticket containing the names of the trustees elected, and Buchanan was in favor of the defeated ticket, the rejection of the entire vote did not affect the result of the election.
Upon the whole case, I am satisfied that there was no error committed in the election, and that the special term properly ordered that Wilson, Elisha Comstock and Marcus W. Comstock were duly elected, and were the trustees of the Pioneer Paper Company, and that its order should be affirmed, with costs.