Court Opinion

ID: 4001904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:58:24.425218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:33.415369
License: Public Domain

On July 26, 1924, the plaintiffs brought suit against Alfred Zaugg to recover upon certain notes. Judgment was entered against him on October 10, 1924. In June, 1925, this action was commenced to set aside a deed executed by Alfred Zaugg to his brother Ernest Zaugg on July 3, 1924, purporting to transfer Alfred Zaugg's interest in and to certain property in Grays Harbor county, and subject the same to the judgment of October 10, 1924.
After issue joined and trial had, the court set aside the deed by a decree wherein the court recited that the deed "was made without consideration, and was *Page 128 
accepted by Ernest Zaugg for the express purpose to cheat, hinder and delay and defraud the plaintiffs in the collection of their judgment." The defendants appeal.
[1] The sole question here is whether the evidence establishes fraud in the taking of the deed. There was evidence showing that the property was transferred for a fraction of its real value, at a time when respondent was pressing payment of its claim. There was also a showing that, after Alfred Zaugg had executed the deed to his brother, he had negotiated the sale of a portion of the land to a third party.
Appellant argues that the testimony of his witnesses shows that the value of the land so deeded was only about one-fourth of the amount testified to by respondents' witnesses. This goes to the weight of the testimony.
It is unnecessary to detail the evidence. There was ample evidence upon the part of respondents to support the court's decree. While there was evidence upon behalf of the appellant to verify his contention, the court chose to believe the respondents' witnesses, and, upon a careful reading of the record, we cannot say that the court was in error in so doing.
Judgment affirmed.
TOLMAN, C.J., HOLCOMB, BRIDGES, and FULLERTON, JJ., concur. *Page 129