Court Opinion

ID: 992658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:55:34.337897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:12.423898
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7857

DEE DEIDRE FARMER,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-96-699-H)

Submitted:   July 10, 1997                 Decided:   July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dee Deidre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer
v. North Carolina State Bar, No. CA-96-699-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22,

1996). Appellant's motion for injunction is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2