Court Opinion

ID: 9426253
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:17:19.067482+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:59.865622
License: Public Domain

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those *899of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

 Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (dissenting); Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 426-433 (1966) (concurring in judgment); Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, 491-492 (1966) (dissenting); Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (dissenting).

 Ginzburg v. United States, supra, at 476 (dissenting); Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502, 515-518 (1966) (dissenting).