Court Opinion

ID: 8434508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 10:46:05.412179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:41.001830
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM ***
Enesri Mohammed Abdulkerim petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (the “Convention”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
Where, as here, the BIA conducted a de novo review of the record and made an independent determination of whether relief is appropriate, this court reviews the decision of the BIA. Molinos-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001). The BIA’s finding that Abdulkerim submitted a fraudulent birth certificate supports an adverse credibility determination because it goes to Abdulkerim’s identity, a key element of his asylum claim. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003) (upholding adverse credibility finding where inconsistencies went to key elements of the asylum application, including identity and membership in a social group). Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination. See Akinmade v. INS, 196 F.3d 951, 956 (9th Cir.1999).
Because Abdulkerim failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).
Abdulkerim has waived his claim for protection under the Convention by failing to raise any arguments in the opening brief challenging the denial of this claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.