Court Opinion

ID: 2542978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:17:53.706518+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:46.505065
License: Public Domain

339 S.W.3d 377 (2007)
In re the SOMERVILLE RAILROAD TIE TREATMENT PLANT.
No. 07-0380.
Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
July 10, 2007.

THE MOTION FOR TRANSFER IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS FOLLOWS:
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the materials filed by the parties in the captioned matter, the *378 panel is not persuaded that the two trial judges handling these cases in Tarrant and Burleson Counties have made significant inconsistent rulings or failed to protect witnesses or parties from inconvenience or duplicative discovery or that such rulings are likely in the future. The motion for transfer is therefore denied without prejudice to file a second motion if the judges issue inconsistent rulings on significant issues or if they do not protect witnesses and parties from duplicative discovery demands or other inconvenience.