Court Opinion

ID: 6001292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:56:16.415665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:08.192252
License: Public Domain

Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]).
All concur except Lawton and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050, 1051 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Denman, P. J., Law-ton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.