Court Opinion

ID: 9384834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-05 08:09:21.376913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:56.744404
License: Public Domain

In the
                   Court of Appeals
     Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                       No. 06-23-00009-CV

                  EVERICK L. MONK, Appellant

                                 V.

           OFFICER MASSEY, LT. VONN, SGT. PREE,
   BOWIE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, ET AL., STEVE BURTON,
KEITH CLARK, BRANDON HARVEL, JOSHUA LATHAM, ALAN OWENS,
                  AND S. HODGE, Appellees

              On Appeal from the 202nd District Court
                      Bowie County, Texas
                  Trial Court No. 22C0548-202

           Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
            Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Everick L. Monk is an inmate at the Bowie County Correctional Center. On May 31,

2022, he sued “Officer Massey, Lt. Vonn, Sgt. Pree, Warden Wilson, Officer Philson, Sheriff

Neal,” the Bowie County Detention Center, and inmates Steve Burton, Keith Clark, Brandon

Harrell, Joshua Latham, Alan Latham, and “Inmate[] Hodge” for alleged assault and coercion.

Monk filed a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. On December 16, 2022,

Monk filed an amended complaint adding additional defendants and seeking damages and

injunctive relief. On December 30, 2022, the trial court entered an order dismissing Monk’s

lawsuit for failure to comply with the mandates of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.001–.014. Monk appeals the

trial court’s order of dismissal. Because Monk did not comply with the requirements of Chapter

14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code in this Court, we dismiss this appeal.

       Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the clerk of this Court is required to

collect filing fees set by statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b). An inmate who files an affidavit or a declaration of inability to pay

costs in an appeal must also comply with Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002(a). Failure to do so is grounds for dismissal. See

McLean v. Livingston, 486 S.W.3d 561, 562 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam).

       Section 14.004 requires an inmate plaintiff to file an additional affidavit or declaration

identifying each prior lawsuit filed by the inmate without the benefit of legal representation,

except for suits filed under the Texas Family Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

                                                2
§ 14.004(a). The affidavit or declaration of previous filings must be accompanied by a certified

copy of the plaintiff’s inmate trust account statement reflecting the balance of the account at the

time the appeal was filed and all account activity during the six months preceding the date the

appeal was filed. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.004(c), 14.006(f); see Frey v.

Foster, No. 06-13-00086-CV, 2014 WL 1004494, at *3 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Mar. 14, 2014,

pet. denied) (mem. op.). This procedural prerequisite is “designed ‘to curb the constant, often

duplicative, inmate litigation, by requiring the inmate to notify the trial court of previous

litigation and the outcome.’” Shirley v. Butcher, No. 06-16-00089-CV, 2017 WL 1538164, at *2

(Tex. App.—Texarkana Apr. 27, 2017, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (quoting Frey, 2014 WL

1004494, at *2).

       Because Monk did not file an affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings or a

certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, by letter dated February 28, 2023, we

provided him with ample notice and an opportunity to cure those defects. Our letter also warned

Monk that failure to comply with Chapter 14’s requirements by March 30, 2023, would result in

dismissal of his appeal. In response to our letter, Monk filed an affidavit of previous filings that

did not set forth the operative facts of each case. He also did not comply with our directive to

file a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement.

                                                  3
       Because Monk failed to meet the requirements of Sections 14.004 and 14.006(f) after

having been provided an opportunity to cure the defects, we dismiss this appeal.

                                            Charles van Cleef
                                            Justice

Date Submitted:       March 30, 2023
Date Decided:         March 31, 2023

                                                4