Court Opinion

ID: 2876169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 06:43:12.553889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:34.137822
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-09-00260-CV

                                      Troy Rose, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  City of Brady, Texas, Appellee

 FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCCULLOCH COUNTY, 198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
        NO. 2008143, HONORABLE EMIL KARL PROHL, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               The appellant’s brief was due on July 9, 2009. On July 21, 2009, this Court notified

appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a proper motion for extension of time

by July 31, 2009, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, the

appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.1 Accordingly, we dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution.

                                             ___________________________________________

                                             Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 26, 2009

       1
         On May 11, 2009, the appellant filed a motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal.
Because the filing fee has not been paid and no certificate of conference has been filed, see Tex. R.
App. P. 10.1(a)(5), the motion remains pending and is hereby dismissed as moot.