Court Opinion

ID: 9412368
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-29 21:00:57.325802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:08.540797
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1318      Doc: 19         Filed: 07/28/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1318

        LISA RENIA CYPRESS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        PNC BANK, N.A.; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00373-EWH-RJK)

        Submitted: July 25, 2023                                          Decided: July 28, 2023

        Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Lisa Renia Cypress, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Anthony Hatfield, Daniel J. Tobin,
        BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Michelle Workman Clayton,
        NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Eastville, Virginia, for
        Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1318      Doc: 19        Filed: 07/28/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Lisa Renia Cypress appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action

        against Defendants PNC Bank and the Northampton County Board of Supervisors. We

        have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

        court’s order. Cypress v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 2:21-cv-00373-EWH-RJK (E.D. Va.

        Mar. 17, 2023). We deny Cypress’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2