Court Opinion

ID: 727525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 10:29:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:47.885740
License: Public Domain

97 F.3d 1450
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Troy Donyel STANSBURY, a/k/a Tommy D. Rodriguez, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6287.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

Kevin Michael Schad, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Harvey E. Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214.   We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Stansbury, Nos.  CR-89-434-S;  CA-96-36-S (D.Md. Feb. 16, 1996).  We deny Appellant's motion to transfer this case to a formal briefing schedule and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, including Appellant's informal brief, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED