Court Opinion

ID: 655949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:47:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:13.870662
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 32
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Barry Allen MORTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-10106.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1993.*Decided Oct. 6, 1993.

Before:  FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Barry Allen Morton appeals his sentence of 150 months, imposed following his plea of guilty to eleven counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

3
Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Morton's counsel submitted a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review.   Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.   Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review.   Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3