Court Opinion

ID: 5101626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 21:47:19.4641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:03.061319
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jesse Jackson, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea attorney provided ineffective assistance, which rendered his guilty plea involuntary. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).