Court Opinion

ID: 9645365
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:22:49.906133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:28.031193
License: Public Domain

CALKINS, J.,
with whom DANA and ALEXANDER, JJ., join,
concurring.
[¶ 41] I concur in the result, but I write separately because I think that it is unnecessary for the Court to determine whether 17 M.R.S.A. § 2701 or 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4302 provides a cause of action for the relief sought by the Charltons. Even assuming that there is a cause of action, there is no question that the Charltons must demonstrate that they have been damaged in order to obtain relief. The trial court found that the Charltons were not damaged, and that finding is supported by the evidence. That finding alone disposes of this case. The discussion of the availability of a cause of action is unnecessary to a disposition of this appeal.