Court Opinion

ID: 11010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 05:58:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:51.794520
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 96-10196

                        BENJAMIN W. MCKEE,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

                              VERSUS

        WILLIAM PERRY, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

                                          Defendant-Appellee.

          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                        (3:95-CV 0327-T)

                         December 4, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     McKee challenges the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to the defendant rejecting McKee’s action for loss of

employment opportunity because of age discrimination.

     For essentially the reasons stated by the district court in

its thorough order of December 26, 1995, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. Although the plaintiff, who was 54 years of age,

established a prima facie case, the defendant produced evidence the

plaintiff was not as qualified as applicants who were accepted in

     *Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
the program McKee sought to join.     This was a non-discriminatory

reason for the challenged action.      McKee then failed to produce

sufficient evidence to show that the employer’s stated reason for

refusing to select McKee into the program was untrue or pretextual.

McKee’s retaliation claim must fail for the same reason.         Because

McKee failed to show that the proffered reason for the employer’s

action   (superior   qualifications   of   other   candidates)    was   a

pretextual reason for not selecting McKee, no inference arises that

the employer failed to select McKee for the program because he

filed an EEOC complaint.

     AFFIRMED.

                                  2