Court Opinion

ID: 996345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:49:28.200179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.707184
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6714

ROBERT J. CAPROOD,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; WILLIAM D. CATOE; LAURIE F.
BESSINGER; THOMAS MCCANTS; VAUGHN JACKSON,

                                              Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-98-603-0-22BD)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Caprood, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caprood v. Moore,

No. CA-98-603-0-22BD (D.S.C. May 1, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2