Court Opinion

ID: 9665215
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:42:50.228847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:08:25.687848
License: Public Domain

Riley, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I respectfully dissent from the opinion of my colleagues in Powers, Deyarmond, Nicholson, and Schiebout for the reasons set forth by former Chief Justice Coleman in her opinion in State Farm v Ruuska, 412 Mich 321, 353; 314 NW2d 184 (1982). I would hold that the nonowned automobile exclusion is enforceable.
Thus, I would reverse the decisions of the Court of Appeals in Powers and Schiebout, and affirm the decisions of the Court of Appeals in Deyarmond and Nicholson.
Finally, I am in accord with the result reached by my colleagues in Dennison.
Boyle, J., concurred with Riley, J.