Court Opinion

ID: 998760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:15:36.384628+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:30.858213
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7327

STEPHEN A. SHARP,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-97-1170-AM)

Submitted:   March 16, 1999                  Decided:   May 18, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen A. Sharp, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-

97-1170-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2