Court Opinion

ID: 5829916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 21:58:22.276933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:25.130695
License: Public Domain

The court properly admitted the unredacted “aided report” because there was sufficient evidence that plaintiff was the source of the information therein, including the location of the accident (see Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth., 41 AD3d 174, 175 [2007]; see also McDermott v Barker, 20 AD2d 546 [1963]). In light of this and the other evidence presented at trial, the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Concur— Andrias, J.P, Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.