Court Opinion

ID: 1004551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:43:01.064798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:12.423875
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Nagy,
  
  No. CA-98-951-5-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2000; entered Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.