Court Opinion

ID: 6722021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 22:56:17.816566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:34.613368
License: Public Domain

KUNKLE, J.
Epitomized Opinion
Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract
This was an action brought by the Attorney General against DeWitt upon an award of the Industrial Commission of Ohio made in her behalf on account of the death of her husband. The evidence disclosed that DeWitt and others were in the straw business and that they had contracted with one Watson to bail their straw. Watson employed five or more workmen in the bailing of the straw, among whom was the decedent, and Watson failed to comply with thq provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
As the court took the major portion of the case from the jury, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants. In reversing this judgment, the Court of Appeals held:
1. 1465-61 GC. (107 OL. 159),° which provides that a person in the employ of an independent contractor or subcontractor who fails to comply with the Workmen’s Compensation Act, shall for the purpose of workmen’s *745compensation, be deemed the employe of the principal who has entered into such independent contract or subcontract, is constitutional.
Attorneys — John G. Price, R. R. Zurmehly, R. R. Maddox and Rankin and Rankin, fox-state; Hidy & Sanderson, fox- DeWitt et al.
2. A principal Who extensively purchases, sells and handles hay and straw, the bailing whereof is one of the incidents of such business, is liable under above act for an injury to a workman employed by a contractor engaged in bailing hay for such principal, even although such principal has a contract for such bailing at a specified rate per bale, which contract stipulates that such contractor will employ and pay the necessary labor.