Court Opinion

ID: 9379599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-15 20:07:54.241375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:49.936552
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                              EASTERN DISTRICT

 IN THE INTEREST OF: N.E.M. PETITION             : No. 288 EAL 2022
 OF : N.E.M., A CHILD IN CUSTODY                 :
                                                 :
                                                 : Petition for Allowance of Appeal
                                                 : from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF : N.E.M. PETITION             : No. 289 EAL 2022
OF : N.E.M., A CHILD IN CUSTODY                  :
                                                 :
                                                 : Petition for Allowance of Appeal
                                                   From the Order of the Superior Court

                                         ORDER

PER CURIAM

       AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below.            Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

       Did not the Superior Court err in denying the petition for specialized review
       under Pa.R.A.P. 1612 without issuing a memorandum opinion where
       petitioner had a right to review, such review falls under the abuse of
       discretion standard, and the juvenile court failed to make a record of its
       reasons or issue an opinion for the Superior Court to review?