Court Opinion

ID: 7588996
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:41:44.319212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:37.934479
License: Public Domain

LETTS, Judge,
dissenting.
The repeated references to insurance, subrogation rights and the relative personal finances (and even ages) of the participants became a feature of this trial. I would reverse upon the authority of Tito v. Potashnick, 488 So.2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Levin v. Hanks, 356 So.2d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Pierce v. Smith, 301 So.2d 805 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 193 (Fla.1975).