Court Opinion

ID: 8442366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:14:45.577845+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:50.682517
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
William Fernando Beard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re*439versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED