Court Opinion

ID: 2691775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:10:46.400755+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:14:13.871252
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Shenyey v. Glasgow, 124 Ohio St. 3d 237, 2010-Ohio-8.]

       SHENYEY, APPELLANT, v. GLASGOW ET AL.; STATE FARM MUTUAL
                 AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.
        [Cite as Shenyey v. Glasgow, 124 Ohio St. 3d 237, 2010-Ohio-8.]
Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed on the authority of State Farm Mut.
        Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grace.
 (No. 2009-0921— Submitted December 2, 2009 — Decided January 12, 2010.)
       APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 91713,
                                    2009-Ohio-1366.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The appeal as to appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is
dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
        {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to appellant’s
Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III on the authority of State Farm Mut. Auto.
Ins. Co. v. Grace, 123 Ohio St. 3d 471, 2009-Ohio-5934, 918 N.E.2d 135.
        MOYER,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG         STRATTON,   O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Peter F. Shenyey, pro se.
        Gallagher, Gams, Pryor, Tallan & Littrell, L.L.P., and James R. Gallagher,
for appellee.
                              ______________________