Court Opinion

ID: 9674623
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:31:58.875607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:28.608570
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Judge.
Appellant again contends that the trial court erred in failing to find him not guilty because the traffic engineer’s report was not filed in accordance with Section 41-6, Code of Ordinances, City of Houston.
In addition to what we said on original submission, we note that Section 41-6, supra, which is before us as appellant’s Exhibit #1, provides that the traffic engineer’s report “pursuant to the authority granted in this chapter shall, unless othenvise provided herein” be filed with the city secretary.
The entire Code of Ordinances was not introduced in evidence, and, not being before us, we are unable to determine whether the filing of the traffic engineer’s report with the city secretary constitutes the sole method provided therein for giving notice of the contents of such report.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.