Court Opinion

ID: 9374833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-24 08:08:07.082085+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:53.428240
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-23-00027-CV
                               __________________

                        IN RE LONNIE KADE WELSH

__________________________________________________________________

                           Original Proceeding
           435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas
                    Trial Cause No. 15-01-00659-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Lonnie Kade Welsh has been declared a vexatious litigant and is prohibited

from filing pro se any new litigation in a court of this State without first obtaining

permission from the local administrative judge. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code

Ann. §§ 11.102(a), 11.103(a). Welsh filed his mandamus petition without first

obtaining the required permission.

      A clerk of a court may not file litigation presented, pro se, by a vexatious

litigant who is subject to a prefiling order unless the litigant obtains an order from

the local administrative judge permitting the filing. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem Code

                                          1
Ann. § 11.103(a). On February 3, 2023, we notified the parties that Welsh is a

vexatious litigant and warned that the mandamus proceeding would be dismissed

unless we received an order from the local administrative judge. See Tex. Civ. Prac.

& Rem. Code Ann. § 11.102(a). We have not received notice that the local

administrative judge has permitted the filing of litigation by Welsh. Accordingly,

the petition is dismissed without prejudice.

      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 22, 2023
Opinion Delivered February 23, 2023

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.

                                          2