Court Opinion

ID: 4461262
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-04 21:02:31.197758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:03.250985
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                               OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                    Filed: October 28, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
RAMI HATTER,                                  *      No. 15-245V
                                              *
                 Petitioner,                  *      Special Master Sanders
                                              *
v.                                            *
                                              *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *      Stipulation for Award; Influenza (“flu”)
                                              *      Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”);
                                              *      Multiple Sclerosis (“MS”).
          Respondent.                         *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                                           DECISION 1

        On March 10, 2015, Rami Hatter (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant
to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012).
Petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on December 9, 2013, caused him
to develop Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”) and caused or significantly aggravated his multiple
sclerosis (“MS”). See Stip. at 1, ECF No. 90. Petitioner further alleged that he experienced the
residual effects of his injury for more than six months. Id.

        On October 25, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation to Petitioner. Id. at 2. Respondent denies that the flu
vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged GBS, MS, or any other injury. Id. Nevertheless, the parties
agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. I find the stipulation reasonable and
adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

1
  This decision shall be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913
(codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). This means the Decision will be
available to anyone with access to the Internet. As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party
has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that
is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2)
that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
       The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

               1. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity, paid to the life
                  insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased; and

               2. A lump sum of $331,155.00 in the form of a check payable to
                  [P]etitioner.

                   These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would
                   be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

       I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award
should be made consistent with the stipulation.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of
Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                     s/Herbrina D. Sanders
                                                     Herbrina D. Sanders
                                                     Special Master

3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                2