Court Opinion

ID: 991024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:30:40.253554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:40.330799
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

DAVID A. BABB,

                                           Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-92-376, CA-96-958-6-20)

Submitted:   December 12, 1996        Decided:     December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Babb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and Appellant's motion for produc-

tion of documents. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Babb, Nos. CR-92-376; CA-96-958-6-

20 (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2