Court Opinion

ID: 4689725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-25 15:01:26.163832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:04:55.887132
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                       ____________
No. 20-5246                                                  September Term, 2020
                                                                       1:20-cv-00867-UNA
                                                        Filed On: May 25, 2021
Scott Sattler,

                 Appellant

       v.

United States Department of Justice, et al.,

                 Appellees

            ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

       BEFORE:         Pillard and Walker, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit
                       Judge

                                      JUDGMENT

        This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant, which includes a motion
to appoint counsel. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

        ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. In civil cases,
appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated
sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is

        FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders entered
June 9, 2020, and July 21, 2020, be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district
court erred in dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant’s
complaint did not set forth “a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s
jurisdiction” or “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is
entitled to relief.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)
(A complaint that offers only “labels and conclusions” that are not supported by factual
allegations does not satisfy Rule 8(a)'s pleading requirements.). Additionally, appellant
failed to plead facts to establish his standing to sue, and “the defect of standing is a
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 20-5246                                                September Term, 2020

defect in subject matter jurisdiction.” Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir.
1987). Appellant has failed to establish standing because he has not pled any actual or
imminent injury aside from, at best, a generalized grievance. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S.
490, 499 (1975) (“When the asserted harm is a ‘generalized grievance’ shared in
substantially equal measure by all or a large class of citizens, that harm alone normally
does not warrant exercise of jurisdiction.”).

        Moreover, appellant has failed to present any argument on appeal challenging
the district court’s denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment and has therefore
forfeited any such argument. See, e.g., U.S. ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380
F.3d 488, 497 (D.C. Cir 2004).

        Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

                                       Per Curiam

                                                         FOR THE COURT:
                                                         Mark J. Langer, Clerk

                                                 BY:     /s/
                                                         Daniel J. Reidy
                                                         Deputy Clerk

                                          Page 2