Court Opinion

ID: 9364282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-18 20:01:10.029155+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:37.012213
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

Defendant.

)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Vv. ) Criminal No. 21-0123 (PLF)
)
VITALI GOSSJANKOWSKI, )
)
)
)

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On September 9, 2022, defendant Vitali GossJankowski filed a Motion to
Suppress Statements. See Motion to Suppress Statements (““Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 66]. The
government filed a response on September 23, 2022, see United States’ Response in Opposition
to Defendant Vitali GossJankowski’s Motion to Suppress Statements [Dkt. No. 78], and
Mr. GossJankowski filed a reply on September 30, 2022. See Reply in Support of Motion to
Suppress Statements (“Reply”) [Dkt. No. 82]. The Court heard testimony on this motion at an
evidentiary hearing on January 11, 2023 and oral argument at a hearing on January 17, 2023.

Mr. GossJankowski’s motion sought to suppress at trial statements that he made
to law enforcement officers on January 14, January 17, and January 18, 2021 on the grounds that
these statements were “made involuntarily and obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment of
the U.S. Constitution and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).” Mot. at 1.
Mr. GossJankowski argued that his statements to law enforcement officers on January 14 and

January 17, 2021 were not voluntary and were obtained in violation of Miranda because he was

 

“not adequately apprised of his right against self-incrimination and his right to counsel prior to

undergoing custodial interrogation.” Id. at 2-3, 5. In addition, he argued that his statements to
law enforcement officers after he was arrested on January 18, 2021 were obtained in violation of
Miranda because officers continued to question him after he purportedly invoked his right to
counsel. See Reply at 6-7. Among other things, the Court found that Mr. GossJankowski was
not in custody on January 14 and January 17 and that he had not unambiguously invoked his
right to counsel on January 18. For the reasons stated on the record in open court at the
January 17, 2023 hearing, the Court denied Mr. GossJankowski’s motion in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Mr. GossJankowski’s Motion to Suppress Statements [Dkt.
No. 66] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

(Pawk Ande —

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
United States District Judge

DATE: ( | ie | 22