Court Opinion

ID: 3126492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:24:55.930727+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:37.211581
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00431-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________
 
HAROLD HIGGINS AND LONNIE HIGGINS,	APPELLANTS,

v.

MATAGORDA COUNTY AND VAN VLECK
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.,	      APPELLEES. 
	____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 130th District Court 

of Matagorda County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on December 4, 2009. (1)  On
January 5, 2010,  the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has
been received from appellants.  Appellee DOH Oil Company has filed a motion to dismiss
this appeal for want of prosecution.  
	Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file a brief, or file a brief.  Accordingly, appellee DOH Oil
Company's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

							PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 11th
day of February, 2010. 

 

1. 1 The brief was originally due on August 24, 2009.  This Court subsequently granted appellants three
extensions of time to file the brief, extending the due date until December 4, 2009.