Court Opinion

ID: 4304224
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-16 00:00:18.360197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:50.847004
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-40201      Document: 00514601275         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/15/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-40201                       United States Court of Appeals

                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                        August 15, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SETH DEANDRE TURNER, also known as Boonie,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:15-CR-119-9

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Seth Deandre Turner has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Turner has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
us to make a fair evaluation of Turner’s claim of ineffective assistance of

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40201    Document: 00514601275     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/15/2018

                                 No. 17-40201

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Turner’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, Turner’s motion for appointment of new
counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2