Court Opinion

ID: 4380955
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-26 16:34:39.830207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:16.108770
License: Public Domain

People v Cherry (2019 NY Slip Op 02288)

People v Cherry

2019 NY Slip Op 02288

Decided on March 26, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 26, 2019

Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, Gesmer, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

8803 1205/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vEmmanuel Cherry, Defendant-Appellant.

Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Eunice C. Lee of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell-Urban of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered June 24, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations, including its resolution of any discrepancies in the four eyewitnesses' testimony. Defendant's intent to cause physical injury could be readily inferred from his conduct.
Defendant's arguments concerning the People's summation are unpreserved (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 911 [2006]; People v Heide, 84 NY2d 943, 944 [1994]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1st Dept 1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]). Any improprieties in the challenged remarks by the prosecutor were not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114 [1st Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 26, 2019
CLERK