Court Opinion

ID: 5828420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 21:35:06.409503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:22.150109
License: Public Domain

Contrary to the contentions of the defendant, who had not yet completed his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including *544the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Burgos, 84 AD3d 975 [2011]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.