Court Opinion

ID: 2922844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:24:11.311401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:30.957065
License: Public Domain

NUMBER13-06-299-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

JOSE SAUCEDO,	Appellant,

v.

PAK-MOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL.,	Appellees.
_______________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
_______________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, JOSE SAUCEDO, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the   214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 02-5385-F.  The
clerk's record was filed on June 1, 2006.  No reporter's record was filed.  Appellant's
brief was due on July 3, 2006.  To date, no appellate brief has been received.
	When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court
may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably
explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure
to timely file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
	On October 23, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was
subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  Appellant was given ten
days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief.  To
date, no response has been received.
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's
failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
prosecution.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 21st day of December, 2006