Court Opinion

ID: 3088465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:24:20.025041+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:08.190546
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00192-CV

                                    COURT OF APPEALS

                        THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                           CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

TED W. KARAM AND
GREGORY SCOTT SMITH,                                                                       Appellants,

                                                      v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 345th District Court
                    of Travis County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria
                        Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

          Appellants, Ted W. Karam and Gregory Scott Smith, perfected an appeal from a

judgment entered by the 345th District Court of Travis County, Texas, in cause number

D-1-GV-11-000640.1 Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal

1
    This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket
on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their

differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.        Costs will be taxed against appellants.        See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                                         PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
5th day of September, 2013.

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West
2005).

                                               2