Court Opinion

ID: 2687148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-31 21:37:02.263909+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:48:20.094640
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                                 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                                 OF FLORIDA

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT M. FOX, JR.,                )
                                   )
             Petitioner,           )
                                   )
v.                                 )                   Case No. 2D13-5031
                                   )
SAM JOHNSON, Chairman Polk County  )
Commissioners; GRADY JUDD, Sheriff )
of Polk County; POLK COUNTY        )
SHERIFF'S OFFICE; and POLK COUNTY )
COMMISSIONERS,                     )
                                   )
             Respondents.          )
                                   )

Opinion filed July 2, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit
Court for the Tenth Judicial Circuit for Polk
County; sitting in its appellate capacity.

Robert M. Fox, Jr., pro se.

Janet A. McDonald, Assistant County
Attorney, Polk County Attorney's Office,
Bartow, for Respondent Polk County.

Mario J. Cabrera, Polk County Sheriff's
Office, Winter Haven, for Respondent Polk
County Sheriff's Office.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

              Robert M. Fox, Jr., seeks a writ of certiorari with respect to the circuit

court's order denying his amended petition for writ of mandamus. In his amended
petition, Mr. Fox, in essence, claimed that he was entitled to "statutory gain time" for

time he was in county jail in Polk County Circuit Criminal Case Numbers CF93-4441A1-

XX and CF94-3348A1-XX prior to being sentenced to prison on the revocation of his

probation in those cases. He sought a writ of mandamus to require the Polk County

Sheriff's Office and the Polk County Board of Commissioners to award him gain time

pursuant to section 951.21(1), Florida Statutes (1993), which concerns gain time for

good conduct for county prisoners. At the time Mr. Fox sought this relief in these cases,

he was no longer a county prisoner. He had already been sentenced to prison and

committed to the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections to serve his prison

sentences, and neither the Sheriff's Office nor the County Commissioners had the

indisputable legal duty, or even the power, to award him section 951.21(1) gain time

against his DOC sentences. See, e.g., Haines v. Broward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 695

So. 2d 818, 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (affirming denial of petition for writ of mandamus

that had been sought to require sheriff and county commissioners to award defendant

gain time pursuant to section 951.21, Florida Statutes (1995), for time the defendant

was in temporary custody of the sheriff, court explained "[a]fter a state prison sentence

has been imposed, a defendant's entitlement to any gain time, even for a temporary

stay in county jail, is a decision that rests with the Department of Corrections").

              Accordingly, we deny Mr. Fox's petition for writ of certiorari.1

              1
               Mr. Fox was adjudicated guilty of two counts each of lewd act upon a
child under sixteen and contributing to the delinquency of a minor and one count of
attempted sexual battery on a child under twelve in Polk County Circuit Criminal Case
Numbers CF93-4441A1-XX and CF94-3348A1-XX. A portion of his sentences for those
offenses included probation, which was subsequently revoked. Mr. Fox has initiated
numerous proceedings with this court, most of which appear to have been filed after the
revocation proceedings were commenced and all of which have merited no relief. See

                                            -2-
             Petition denied.

KELLY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Fox v. State, No. 2D14-2572 (Fla. 2d DCA June 10, 2014) (denying petition for writ of
mandamus by order reported at ---- WL -----); Fox v. State, No. 2D14-294 (Fla. 2d DCA
Jan. 29, 2014) (denying petition for writ of prohibition by order reported at 2014 WL
1789105); Fox v. State, No. 2D13-4957 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 17, 2013) (denying petition
for writ of habeas corpus by order reported at 2013 WL 7095379); Fox v. State, No.
2D13-4849 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 17, 2013) (denying amended petition for writ of habeas
corpus by order reported at 2013 WL 7095382); Fox v. State, 122 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2013) (dismissing petition for writ of prohibition by order in case number 2D13-
4079 as duplicative of case number 2D13-3869); Fox v. State, No. 2D13-3869 (Fla. 2d
DCA August 15, 2013) (denying petition for writ of prohibition by order reported at ----
WL -----); Fox v. State, 115 So. 3d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing appeal in case
number 2D13-2774 by order in summary Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800
case); Fox v. State, 114 So. 3d 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (affirming per curiam in case
number 2D13-744 in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 case); Fox v. State, 114
So. 3d 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (affirming per curiam in case number 2D12-5724
summary rule 3.800 appeal); Fox v. State, No. 2D12-3696 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2013)
(affirming per curiam summary rule 3.800 appeal reported at 2013 WL 2278240); Fox v.
State, No. 2D12-3694 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2013) (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2013)
(affirming per curiam summary rule 3.800 appeal reported at 2013 WL 2278243); Fox v.
State, 92 So. 3d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (affirming per curiam with citations in case
number 2D11-6121 summary rule 3.800 appeal); Fox v. State, 90 So. 3d 285 (Fla. 2d
DCA May 30, 2012) (affirming per curiam with citations in case number 2D12-2025
summary rule 3.800 appeal); Fox v. State, 30 So. 3d 500 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (affirming
per curiam with citations in case number 2D09-5319 summary rule 3.800 appeal). In
conjunction with the foregoing proceedings, Mr. Fox has made a multitude of filings,
including motions for rehearing that were entirely frivolous.
               Mr. Fox has also initiated at least two proceedings with the First District
Court of Appeal that merited no relief. See Fox v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 136 So. 3d 1217
(Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (denying petition for writ of certiorari on the merits in case number
1D13-4006); Fox v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 133 So. 3d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (denying
petition for writ of certiorari on the merits in case number 1D13-2603).
               Finally, at present Mr. Fox has one undecided proceeding pending with
this court. See Fox v. State, No. 2D13-5256 (Fla. 2d DCA filed Oct. 23, 2013)
(appealing order imposing sanctions and prohibiting Mr. Fox from filing any further
pleadings without the assistance of counsel).
               We intend to direct Mr. Fox, by separate order, to show cause why this
court should not direct the clerk of the court to reject all appeals and original
proceedings filed in this court related to circuit court case numbers CF93-4441A1-XX
and CF94-3348A1-XX, unless the filing is submitted by a member in good standing of
The Florida Bar pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

                                           -3-