Court Opinion

ID: 5777853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:44:53.030309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:55.051633
License: Public Domain

Herlihy, P. J. (dissenting).
The present record, albeit vague and indefinite, demonstrates beyond peradventure that part of the property was used for the purposes contemplated and within the purview of section 420 of the Beal Property Tax Law.
Reynolds and Cooke, JJ., concur with Greenblott, J.; Simons, J., dissents in an opinion in which Herlihy, P. J., concurs; Herlihy, P. J., dissents in a separate memorandum.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.