Court Opinion

ID: 9949343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-11 14:11:32.268133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:42.507047
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued March 6, 2024

                                        In The

                                Court of Appeals
                                       For The

                           First District of Texas
                              ————————————
                                NO. 01-24-00179-CV
                             ———————————
                   IN RE JUSTIN CARL PFEIFFER, Relator

             Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator Justin Carl Pfeiffer filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting

we order “the trial court to rule on Relator’s plea prior to proceeding with any merits-

based issues respecting the counterclaims and motion for sanctions,” filed by Real

Parties in Interest David H. Berg and David H. Berg & Associates PC, doing

business as Berg & Androphy.1

1
      The underlying case is Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. David H. Berg and David H. Berg &
      Associates PC, doing business as Berg & Androphy, Cause No. 2022-60439,
      We deny the petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.

      pending in the 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Cory
      Sepolio presiding.

                                         2