Court Opinion

ID: 6347023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-03 20:09:43.990807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:22.000631
License: Public Domain

People v Coyle (2022 NY Slip Op 03646)

People v Coyle

2022 NY Slip Op 03646

Decided on June 3, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 3, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

462 KA 19-00891

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vSCOTT A. COYLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

ROBERT M. GRAFF, LOCKPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. JORDAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered March 18, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (two counts). 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Alls, 187 AD3d 1515, 1515 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: June 3, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court