Court Opinion

ID: 4179072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-20 15:13:30.802003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:23.752287
License: Public Domain

People v Skilling (2017 NY Slip Op 05031)

People v Skilling

2017 NY Slip Op 05031

Decided on June 20, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2017

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber, Kahn, JJ.

1012/11 4335 2804/13 4334

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
v Kirk Skilling, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Shane Tela of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 24, 2012 (Richard Carruthers, J.), and May 27, 2014 (Charles Solomon, J.),
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 20, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.