Court Opinion

ID: 9907509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-06 17:00:51.973913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:59:45.276902
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13403   Document: 5-1      Date Filed: 12/06/2023    Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-13403
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      KENZO ROBERTS,
                                                              Petitioner,
      versus
      U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                             Respondent.

                         ____________________

                  Petition for Review of a Decision of the
                       Board of Immigration Appeals
                         Agency No. A208-054-197
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13403     Document: 5-1     Date Filed: 12/06/2023    Page: 2 of 2

      2                     Opinion of the Court                23-13403

      Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. The 30-day statutory time limit established in the Immigra-
      tion and Nationality Act (“INA”) required Kenzo Roberts to file a
      petition for review of the September 6, 2023, decision by the Board
      of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming his order of removal on
      or before October 6, 2023. See INA §§ 101(a)(47), 240(c)(1)(A), 8
      U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(47), 1229a(c)(1)(A); INA § 242(b)(1)-(2), 8 U.S.C.
      § 1252(b)(1)-(2); see also Dakane v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269,
      1272 n.3 (11th Cir. 2005) (“[A] petitioner has 30 days from the date
      of the final order of removal to seek review in this Court.”). How-
      ever, Roberts did not file a petition for review until October 10,
      2023. Thus, the petition for review is untimely as to the BIA deci-
      sion and we lack jurisdiction to review it. See Fed. R. App. P.
      15(a)(1).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.