Court Opinion

ID: 3993146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:52:25.045008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:25.843057
License: Public Domain

Appellant was charged, by information filed in the superior court of Snohomish county, with the crime of possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same. Thereafter he was tried, convicted and sentenced, and this appeal follows.
There is but one assignment of error on which appellant relies for reversal, and that is the giving of a certain instruction which, appellant claims, does not correctly state the law.
[1] The respondent moves to strike the statement of facts for the reason that the same was not served or filed within the time permitted. The record shows that the trial took place on March 27, 1928, that the appellant was sentenced on April 9, 1928, and that on that day motion for new trial was denied and notice of appeal given in open court. The statement of facts in this case was served on January 16, 1929, and the *Page 399 
same was filed January 17, 1929. Under the repeated holdings of this court, the statement of facts must be stricken. In reRotter's Estate, 148 Wash. 285, 268 P. 866; Chelan ElectricCo. v. Wick, 148 Wash. 479, 269 P. 827.
[2] The only exceptions taken to the instructions given appear in the statement of facts, and, the statement of facts having been stricken, this court will not review the instructions in the absence of exceptions taken thereto. State v. Goddard,132 Wash. 286, 231 P. 794.
Judgment affirmed.
PARKER, MILLARD, BEALS, and MAIN, JJ., concur.