Court Opinion

ID: 174898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-09-07 23:40:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:25:32.308303
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 SEP 07 2010

                                                                            MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 09-50305

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:04-cr-00354-DSF-1

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM*
DANIEL NICHERIE, AKA Seal A,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Central District of California
                     Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted August 30, 2010**
                               Pasadena, California

Before:        KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit
               Judges.

       The district court never issued a ruling on Nicherie’s request for the funds

held in the attorney client trust accounts and the bail bond. Until it does, the matter

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
                                                                                page 2
is still pending before the district court and we have no jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (granting “jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district

courts”); Jacobsen v. U.S. Postal Serv., 993 F.2d 649, 662 (9th Cir. 1992).

      DISMISSED.