Court Opinion

ID: 9516888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:55:07.384737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:47.057534
License: Public Domain

On Application for Rehearing.
Per Curiam:
Defendants move for rehearing, contending that, as appears from our opinion herein, we have, on appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ bill of complaint, *276disposed of tlie ease on tlie merits. Particular reference is made to the statement in the opinion that plaintiffs have shown that they were and are ready to pay the correct amount of tlie purchase price and are entitled to a deed upon payment thereof into court. That statement and the entire opinion are to be viewed not as a final finding of facts or conclusive determination of plaintiffs’ right to the relief prayed, but, rather, as an acceptance of the well-pleaded allegations of plaintiffs’ bill of complaint as true only for purposes of considering the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ bill and the order dismissing, which we reversed. The cause is remanded for filing of such further pleadings as may be necessary and proper and trial on the merits.
Rehearing denied.
Dethmers, Butzel, Carr, Bushnell, Sharpe, Boyles, and Reid, JJ., concurred.
The late Chief Justice North took no part in the decision of this case on application for rehearing.