Court Opinion

ID: 1019035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:29:28.504465+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:19.255942
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6025

RANDY L. VALENTINE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. T. BURGESS, Detective,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.    Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-05-1157)

Submitted: March 30, 2006                     Decided: April 10, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se.    W. Howard Boyd, Jr.,
Jennifer D. Eubanks, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Valentine v. Burgess, No.

CR-05-1157 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2005).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -