Court Opinion

ID: 3072637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:48:59.909188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:08.139142
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued June 2, 2015

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                            ————————————
                              NO. 01-15-00024-CV
                           ———————————
                       COREY L. ROBERTS, Appellant
                                        V.
                   CELIA CLANTON ROBERTS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the County Court at Law
                            Orange County, Texas
                      Trial Court Case No. C-140473-D

                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Corey L. Roberts appeals from a default divorce judgment

rendered in favor of appellee Celia Clanton Roberts. In two issues, Corey contends

that (1) the trial court erred by granting default judgment because the record does

not affirmatively show that he was served with citation in strict compliance with
the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by

naming Celia sole managing conservator of the couple’s two children because

Celia did not request such relief in her pleadings. We reverse and remand. 1

      A default judgment can only be sustained on direct attack if the record

affirmatively demonstrates that the defendant was served with citation in strict

compliance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Primate Constr., Inc. v.

Silver, 884 S.W.2d 151, 152 (Tex. 1994); Paramount Credit, Inc. v. Montgomery,

420 S.W.3d 226, 231 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no pet.) (“We cannot

affirm a default judgment unless it is clear from the face of the record upon whom

the attempted service of process was made, where, when, how, and in what

capacity.”). Pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 107(h), a default judgment may

only be obtained if the return of service has been on file with the court’s clerk for

ten days. TEX. R. CIV. P. 107(h). The lack of strict compliance with Rule 107(h)

precludes the granting of default judgment. See Midstate Envtl. Servs., LP v.

Peterson, 435 S.W.3d 287, 290–91 (Tex. App.—Waco 2014, no pet.).

      In this case, the return of service filed on August 19, 2014. indicates that

Corey was served with citation on July 31, 2014. The trial court granted default

judgment in Celia’s favor on August 26, 2014—seven days after the return of

1
      This appeal, originally filed in the Ninth Court of Appeals, Beaumont, Texas, was
      transferred to the First Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE
      ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013) (authorizing transfer of cases).

                                          2
service was filed with the clerk. Thus, the record affirmatively demonstrates that

the default judgment is invalid because it was granted less than ten days after the

return of service was filed with the clerk’s office. See id.

      Because the record affirmatively shows a lack of strict compliance with the

Rules of Civil Procedure, we sustain Corey’s first issue. Having sustained Corey’s

first issue, we need not consider his second issue.

                                     Conclusion

      We reverse the default judgment and remand this case for further

proceedings.

                                               Russell Lloyd
                                               Justice

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd.

                                           3