Court Opinion

ID: 8145008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:21:32.834346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:33.960603
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Newark v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 192; Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U. S. 608; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., 258 U. S. 604; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178.