Court Opinion

ID: 1417075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:02:13.586764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:22.777395
License: Public Domain

228 S.E.2d 457 (1976)
290 N.C. 666
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joyce Marie WATLINGTON.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
September 1, 1976.
A. Carl Penney, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Norma S. Harrell, Associate Atty., for the State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, N.C.App., 226 S.E.2d 186. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question. Allowed.