Court Opinion

ID: 7086764
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 11:17:51.891192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:00.025308
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed a portion of the alimony deductions Alan Zinsmeister claimed on his 1994, 1995, and 1996 tax returns and assessed deficiencies. Zinsmeister petitioned for redetermination of the deficiencies. The Tax Court1 upheld a portion of the disallowed deductions but ruled that Zinsmeister could not deduct as alimony certain payments he had been ordered to make under temporary support orders and a divorce decree, namely, one-half of the payments made on the family home for a period when he and his ex-wife were co-owners, all payments on a second mortgage on the home, and fees paid to his ex-wife’s attorney for services during the divorce proceedings. Zinsmeister appeals, arguing that all the payments should be deductible as alimony under § 71(b)(1) of *530the Internal Revenue Code. After careful review of the record and the contentions made by Zinsmeister on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Tax Court’s thorough Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion filed November 30, 2000. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

. The HONORABLE CAROLYN MILLER PARR, United States Tax Court Judge.