Court Opinion

ID: 9881557
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-03 13:09:00.531284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:17.484335
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                     San Antonio, Texas
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                               Nos. 04-23-00782-CR, 04-23-00783-CR

                                      Juan Isabel MARTINEZ,
                                              Appellant

                                                  v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                    From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas
                        Trial Court Nos. 21-01-0006-CRA, 21-01-0007-CRA
                           Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Irene Rios, Justice
                  Beth Watkins, Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of a court of appeals.

Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “A defendant’s notice of appeal is

timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended, or within ninety

days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1)).

           The trial court imposed sentences in the underlying causes on February 27, 2023. Because

appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 29,
                                                                    04-23-00782-CR; 04-23-00783-CR

2023. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was

due on April 13, 2023. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant, however, did not file his notice of appeal

until July 31, 2023, and did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely.

       On September 13, 2023, we ordered appellant to show cause why these appeals should not

be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In his response, appellant concedes the notice of appeal is

untimely. Further, the response does not establish that we have jurisdiction over these appeals.

Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                   PER CURIAM

Do not publish

                                                  -2-