Court Opinion

ID: 999897
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:32:30.108615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:22.053692
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL TROY DAVIS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-313, CA-98-275-1)

Submitted:   September 30, 1999           Decided:   October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Troy Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Troy Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)

and his motion for reconsideration.        We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court.       See United States v. Davis, Nos.

CR-95-313; CA-98-275-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 1999, and May 6, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                             DISMISSED

                                   2