Court Opinion

ID: 9624066
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 06:49:55.452879+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:05:38.413888
License: Public Domain

MB. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN and ANDEBSON:
We concur in the result reached in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Adair but not with all that is said in it.
We think there is no question of recrimination in this' ease *207since there is sufficient evidence to sustain the trial court’s finding that tbe wife and not the husband was the offender. That conclusion in our opinion takes the question of recrimination out of this case.
Finding of fact No. II is not inconsistent with the implied finding that the wife and not the husband was the offender.
MR. JUSTICE DAVIS, dissents.