Court Opinion

ID: 6251134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:15:23.282733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:25.371537
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
This action was to recover damages for the loss of crops and growing timber by fire alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence. There was testimony tending to show that the fire was caused by cinders of an unusual size and so large that they could not have escaped from the smoke stack of a properly equipped locomotive. The question thus raised together with that of the plaintiff’s negligence in not making a reasonable effort to extinguish the fire and save the property from destruction was clearly for the jury and were properly submitted.
The measure of damages was not the value of the wood destroyed, but the injury to the farm as a whole by the destruction of the timber. Much of the timber was young and not marketable and had no value as wood. It was growing into value and added to the value of the land it covered, and the whole of it added to the value of the farm of which it was a part. The ruling on the subject was in accordance with the opinion in Mahaffey v. Railroad Co., 229 Pa. 285.
The judgment is affirmed.