Court Opinion

ID: 678975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:29:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:06.771158
License: Public Domain

36 F.3d 1092
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Arthur Lee GOODEN, II, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Ms. BRERETON;  Lieutenant Holloway;  Assistant WardenTaylor;  Lonnie Saunders;  N. Brant;  D. L. Cook, Trooper;Larry Huffman;  Vonda Grant;  John Doe;  Mr. Dinkle;Lieutenant Lyles;  Captain M. Taylor;  Lieutenant Boyers,Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6265.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 14, 1994.Decided:  Sept. 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-227-R)
Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appellant pro se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Gooden v. Brereton, No. CA-93-227-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 16, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED