Court Opinion

ID: 4157202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-31 19:11:25.372697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:51:35.010904
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

263
CA 15-01920
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

TIME CAP DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

                      V                             MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
ET AL., DEFENDANT.
----------------------------------------------
COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

                      V

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY
DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
(APPEAL NO. 1.)

MELITO & ADOLFSEN P.C., NEW YORK CITY (S. DWIGHT STEPHENS OF COUNSEL),
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (KEVIN R. VANDUSER OF COUNSEL), FOR
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

RIVKIN RADLER LLP, UNIONDALE (FRANK MISITI OF COUNSEL), FOR
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme
Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered July 21, 2015.
The order and judgment, among other things, denied the cross motion of
defendant-third-party plaintiff seeking a declaration that third-party
defendant is a coinsurer for plaintiff on a 50/50 basis in the
underlying action.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from
is unanimously affirmed without costs.

     Same memorandum as in Time Cap Dev. Corp. v Colony Ins. Co.
([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 31, 2017]).

Entered:    March 31, 2017                       Frances E. Cafarell
                                                 Clerk of the Court