Court Opinion

ID: 5547625
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 21:22:09.173393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:57.623564
License: Public Domain

The Chancellor :—This cause is now submitted for a final decree. The defendant asks that the bill against her may be dismissed with costs; that the moneys furnished by her friends for the expenses for her defence may be paid by the complainant; and that she may be paid the arrears of the alimony up to the time of the final decree, at the rate of $25 per month, as allowed by the first order.
The complainant insists he ought not to pay any more for costs and expenses, and that the alimony in arrear ought not now to be paid; at all events, only to the time of the last trial, and at the rate of $10 per month, as fixed by the last order.
In relation to the costs, and all reasonable expenses of her defence, I have no doubt as to the propriety of the allowance. The complainant has caused those expenses by an unjust prosecution against her; and she has drawn the amount from the liberality of her friends and relations, for the defence of her reputation. It is therefore perfectly equitable and just, that all those disbursements and expense should be paid by him.
*85As to the alimony, I think the defendant is entitled to it up to the termination of the suit by a final decree. She could not be required to return to the roof of her husband until this suit was fully ended. And it is his own neglect that he has not sooner brought it to a final hearing.
The case of Loveden v. Loveden, (1 Phil. Rep. 208,) shows it to be the practice of the ecclesiastical courts in England, in such cases, to allow alimony until the final determination of the suit. Under the circumstances of this case, I regret it is not in my power to allow to her the highest sum asked. But as she rested contented under the second order, without attempting to disturb it during the real litigation, the arrears of alimony at the rate of $10 per month, is all that can be allowed.