Court Opinion

ID: 5123946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-11-08 08:06:49.313097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:36.844135
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                          ATLANTA,____________________
                                                   October 20, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0080. IN THE INTEREST OF N. C. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

      In this dependency and legitimation case, Shantricia Robinson, who is
proceeding pro se, has filed an application for discretionary review of the juvenile
court’s order denying her motion to set aside and vacate certain orders and to enter
another and different judgment, and petition for immediate return of custody. The
order, however, is directly appealable.
      Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), “[a]ll judgments or orders in child custody
cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody” are directly
appealable. See Froehlich v. Froehlich, 297 Ga. 551, 553-554 (2) (775 SE2d 534)
(2015). The juvenile court previously issued three orders: a March 29, 2021 order
finding Robinson’s five children to be dependent, denying her motion for return of
custody, and ordering that custody remain with the Fayette County Department of
Family and Children Services; and two April 1, 2021 orders granting two different
fathers’ petitions for legitimation and awarding them temporary custody of three of
the children. Robinson timely appealed these orders, and that appeal remains pending
in this Court. See Case No. A21A1429.1
      Thereafter, Robinson filed a motion to set aside and vacate certain orders and
to enter another and different judgment, and a petition for immediate return of

      1
         Robinson’s appeal of an earlier custody order was dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction because she was represented by counsel at the time she filed that pro se
notice of appeal. See Case No. A21A0841 (Feb. 8, 2021). She is no longer
represented by counsel.
custody, in which she sought to set aside all prior judgments under OCGA § 9-11-60
(d) (2) and asked the court to immediately return full custody of the children to her.
The juvenile court denied the motion and petition in a single order, and Robinson
timely filed an application for discretionary review.
      Because Robinson seeks to challenge, among other things, the juvenile court’s
ruling regarding custody, the order is directly appealable. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11);
see also Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 45-47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017) (we look to the
“issue raised on appeal” to determine whether a party can bring a direct appeal).
      Moreover, OCGA § 5-6-34 (d) provides that
      [w]here an appeal is taken under any provision of subsection (a), (b), or
      (c) of this Code section, all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the
      case which are raised on appeal and which may affect the proceedings
      below shall be reviewed and determined by the appellate court, without
      regard to the appealability of the judgment, ruling, or order standing
      alone and without regard to whether the judgment, ruling, or order
      appealed from was final or was appealable by some other express
      provision of law contained in this Code section, or elsewhere.
Thus, even though appeals from orders denying a motion to set aside a judgment
under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) typically must be initiated by filing an application for
discretionary review, the denial of Robinson’s petition for immediate return of
custody is directly appealable, so OCGA § 5-6-34 (d) entitles Robinson to challenge
any other rulings issued below.2

      2
         However, in this case, Robinson already has an appeal pending, and “[t]he
filing of a notice of appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction to alter a judgment
while appeal of that judgment is pending.” Rocha v. State, 287 Ga. App. 446, 448 (1)
(b) (651 SE2d 781) (2007). Thus, to the extent that Robinson’s motion to set aside
and vacate certain orders and to enter another and different judgment and petition for
immediate return of custody sought to challenge the orders currently on appeal in
Case No. A21A1429, the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to alter those judgments
while the appeal is pending. Nonetheless, she is entitled to a direct appeal of the
denial of her petition for immediate return of custody. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11).
      We will grant a timely filed application for discretionary appeal if the lower
court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this
application is hereby GRANTED, and Robinson shall have ten days from the date of
this order to file a notice of appeal in the juvenile court. If she has already filed a
timely notice of appeal in the juvenile court, she need not file a second notice. The
clerk of the juvenile court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the appeal
record transmitted to this Court.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         10/20/2021
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                                Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.