Court Opinion

ID: 8809912
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 15:00:01.080968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:14.921441
License: Public Domain

WADDILD, District Judge.
I concur in the conclusions of the majority of the court, as stated in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, and dissent from the conclusions in paragraphs 1 and 2, though I am strongly inclined to the view that’the complainant, as between itself and the defendants, is not entitled to the relief prayed for, respecting the sale of its ice cream in the city of Baltimore, because of laches in the prosecution of its suit, if, in fact, it was not estopped by the dismissal of the suit instituted in the state court at Baltimore against the defendants to prevent them from infringing the complainant’s trademark, and unfairly competing with it in its ice cream business; said defendants having duly appeared in said cause.