Court Opinion

ID: 6834408
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:01:29.790306+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:04:39.458148
License: Public Domain

ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing an application for reissue of a patent, relating to erossheads for locomotive engines, with broader claims; the application having been filed almost five years after the grant of the patent.
Two reasons for the allowance of this application are advanced: First, that applicant’s delay was due to the fact that he was employed by the American government as chief locomotive inspector on new railway locomotives for the United States Railroad Administration, during the World War; and, second, that the provisions of the so-called Nolan Act (41 Stat. 1313), being Comp. St. §§ 9431a-9431h, are applicable.
As to the first reason, the Commissioner said: “Appellant was merely a civil employee of the government for a short time, and was in this country at all times. The nature of his employment in no way interfered with his giving attention to his patent and to what it covered, , and discovering the reasons now presented in support of broad*686ened claims.” This ruling constituted no abuse of discretion. In re Lees, 50 App. D. C. 163, 269 F. 679, and cases there cited.
As to the second reason, sections 1 and 6 of the Nolan Act (Comp. St. §§ 9431a-9431f) are relied upon. We agree with the Patent Office that the Nolan Act does not apply here. Section 1 relates to questions of priority, while section 6 is applicable only to applications which became abandoned or forfeited during the time the applicant was serving abroad with the forces of the United States.'
The decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.