Court Opinion

ID: 6329778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-12 22:11:08.181836+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:56.625845
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

                         COURT OF APPEAL

                           FIRST CIRCUIT

                          NO. 2021 CA 0944

                        VILLAS ST. FRANCIS

                              VERSUS

                        HENRY L. MONTRELL

                                    Judgment Rendered:
                                                         APR 0 8 2022

   APPEAL FROM THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
          IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE
                         STATE OF LOUISIANA
                        DOCKET NUMBER 706942

       HONORABLE TIMOTHY E. KELLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING

Thomas R. Temple, Jr.               Attorneys for Plaintiff -Appellee
Joseph J. Cefalu, III               Villa St. Francis
Alexa Candelora
Baton Rouge, LA

Henry L. Montrell                   Defendant -Appellant
Baton Rouge, LA                     In Proper Person

            BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.
McDONALD, J.

      This is an appeal from a judgment of eviction. After review, we dismiss the

appeal.

                     FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

      Henry L. Montrell was a resident of Villa St. Francis, a housing apartment

complex for the elderly in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.     After Mr. Montrell engaged in

disruptive and threatening behavior that violated the lease on numerous occasions,

Villa St. Francis notified Mr. Montrell by hand -delivered and certified mail on

March 31, 2021, that the lease was terminated for cause, which included altercations

with the Villa St. Francis property management staff, and that he had to vacate the

premises by April 7, 2021.     On April 9, 2021, after Montrell had not moved out,

Villa St. Francis filed a petition for eviction with the Justice of the Peace Court.

      The matter was heard on April 19, 2021 and Mr. Montrell was present with

his counsel.    After the hearing, the Justice of the Peace granted the petition for

eviction, ordering Mr. Montrell to vacate the premises by May 1, 2021.    Mr. Montrell

appealed the eviction by filing a petition in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.

Villa St. Francis answered the petition, maintaining that the eviction was proper and

lawful as Mr. Montrell had engaged in repeated disruptive,           intimidating,     and

threatening behavior that violated the terms of his lease and posed a safety risk to

other tenants, visitors, and staff.

      The matter was tried de novo at the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.

Thereafter, the district court affirmed the eviction and ordered Mr. Montrell to vacate

the premises at Villa St. Francis on or before May 31, 2021.     Mr. Montrell vacated

the premises by May 31, 2021. Mr. Montrell appealed the trial court judgment to

this court.   Villa St. Francis filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, maintaining that

Mr. Montrell was not entitled to another appeal.      Alternatively, Villa St. Francis

maintains that the judgment should be affirmed.

                                           2
                                     DISCUSSION

      Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 4924 provides that:

      A. Appeal from a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace court or
          a clerk of court shall be taken to the parish court or, if there is no
          parish court, to the district court of the parish in which the justice of
          the peace court is situated.

      B. The case is tried de novo on appeal. However, a trial de novo, in the
           district court from the justice of the peace court, is not subject to the
          jurisdictional limit of the justice of the peace court.

      C. No further appeal from the judgment of the parish or district court
         is allowed.

      D. Supervisory jurisdiction of the proceedings in the parish or district
         court may be exercised by the court of appeal which otherwise
          would have had appellate jurisdiction

      Pursuant to La. C. C. P. art. 4924, Mr. Montrell exercised his right to an appeal

from the judgment of the Justice of the Peace to the Nineteenth Judicial District

Court. No further appeal is allowed. La. C. C. P. art. 4924( C). Thus, we dismiss the

appeal.

                                    CONCLUSION

      For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed.       Costs of this appeal are

assessed against Henry L. Montrell.

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                             3