Court Opinion

ID: 6934718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:25:07.640025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:23.790010
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants, former ORS 487.540, after trial by jury. After the verdict, she petitioned for diversion under former ORS 484.445. She argues that the trial court impermissibly refused to consider her petition on the ground that the request was made after trial and that diversion could not be granted after a conviction.
It is not entirely clear from the trial record whether the court denied defendant’s diversion request because it was made subsequent to trial, as defendant argues, or on its merits. In State v. Ewen, 77 Or App 274, 712 P2d 183 (1986), we held that neither the plain meaning of ORS 484.445(4) (a) nor its legislative history justifies preclusion of a diversion petition solely because it is filed after trial. Because we cannot determine if the court denied the petition on its merits, we reverse and remand with instructions to consider the petition for diversion on its merits.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to consider the petition for diversion.