Court Opinion

ID: 9747929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 15:43:46.926648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:28.969015
License: Public Domain

HENRY, Senior Judge,
dissenting in part and concurring in part:
I respectfully dissent from so much of the majority opinion as would vacate the judgment and opinion of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. Kiesel and remand for consideration of mandamus relief. While I agree with the majority’s well-written explanation of the application of the writ, I am of the opinion that in this particular case the appellant’s claims relating to such relief are purely speculative, simply restate the alleged retrospective harms, and do not rise to the extraordinary level necessary to justify the issuance of a writ. Accordingly, I would affirm the opinion and judgment of the trial court in its entirety.