Court Opinion

ID: 4455557
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-14 01:00:23.29294+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:30.541867
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-11187      Document: 00515198093        Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/13/2019

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                    No. 18-11187                         November 13, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

JAVIER GUERRA, also known as Chop,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 3:14-CR-266-16

Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The attorney appointed to represent Javier Guerra has moved to

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11187    Document: 00515198093    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/13/2019

                                No. 18-11187

withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerra has not filed
a response.

      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2