Court Opinion

ID: 9418702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:36:21.375749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:08.064810
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Sutherland,
concurring.
I did not agree with the decision in the Anderson case, but so long as the majority of the court adheres to it, I *101am bound to follow it in similar cases; and in principle, I think, it controls here. It is true that there are differences in matters of fact between the present case and that case, but they seem to me not to be of a character to affect the pertinence of the Anderson decision and call for the application of a different rule. For that reason alone I concur in the opinion of the court just announced. Were it not for the Anderson case I should join in the dissent.
Mr. Justice'Roberts concurs in this view.