Court Opinion

ID: 9410558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-21 19:02:10.461774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:58.457648
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11702   Document: 19-1     Date Filed: 07/21/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                        ____________________

                               No. 23-11702
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                        ____________________

       NELSON OSWALDO LINARES,
                                                             Petitioner,
       versus
       U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                          Respondent.

                        ____________________

                  Petition for Review of a Decision of the
                       Board of Immigration Appeals
                         Agency No. A216-462-840
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11702      Document: 19-1      Date Filed: 07/21/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-11702

       Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for
       lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED. Petitioner seeks review of the
       Board of Immigration Appeals’ March 21, 2023 order affirming the
       Immigration Judge’s final order of removal. However, the petition
       for review was not filed with us until May 19, 2023 at the earliest,
       which is the date the petition was postmarked. See Fed. R. App. P.
       25(a)(2)(A)(iii). Accordingly, the petition for review is untimely
       and cannot invoke our jurisdiction. See INA § 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C.
       § 1252(b)(1) (providing that a petition for review must be filed no
       later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal); Stone
       v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995) (stating that the statutory time limit
       is mandatory and jurisdictional and not subject to equitable toll-
       ing).
            Accordingly, this petition is DISMISSED. All other pending
       motions are DENIED as MOOT.