Court Opinion

ID: 8674463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:21:01.185775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:23.689086
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas N. Tweh seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing Tweh’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against several Defendants and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because Tweh’s claims against three Defendants remain, the orders Tweh seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Tweh’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.