Court Opinion

ID: 8448661
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:04:45.015097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:57.388232
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joe Nathan Darby appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason stated by the district court. United States v. Darby, No. 4:05-cr-00465-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.