Court Opinion

ID: 9964871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-01 06:10:47.887968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:46.051560
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed April 25, 2024

                                      SIn The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-24-00483-CV

                       IN RE MARK MILLIGAN, Relator

          Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. F-1127465

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                  Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
                          Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
      Before the Court is relator’s April 23, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus

challenging certain orders as void.

      Upon review, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re

Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July

14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a) (requiring

complete list of parties and names and addresses of counsel), 52.3(b) (requiring table

of contents), 52.3(c) (requiring index of authorities), 52.3(f) (requiring issues or

points presented), 52.3(j) (requiring certification that relator has reviewed petition
and concluded every factual statement in petition is supported by competent

evidence included in the appendix or record), 52.7(a) (requiring sufficient record).

      Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

      240483F.P05                          /Bill Pedersen, III/
                                           BILL PEDERSEN, III
                                           JUSTICE

                                        –2–