Court Opinion

ID: 9390138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-26 21:01:04.356239+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:31.749675
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7271      Doc: 6         Filed: 04/25/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7271

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        GLENN DUBOIS,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00006-MSD-DEM-2)

        Submitted: April 20, 2023                                           Decided: April 25, 2023

        Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Glenn Dubois, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7271     Doc: 6         Filed: 04/25/2023    Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Glenn Dubois appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order

        granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States

        v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). We have

        reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We

        therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Dubois, No. 4:12-cr-00006-

        MSD-DEM-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                                   2