Court Opinion

ID: 3123292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:37:32.068571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:58.610476
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00252-CR

                          COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                   CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JEREMY SCHLOSSER,                                                       Appellant,

                                         v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 94th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela
                   Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Jeremy Schlosser, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he was granted a new trial on punishment and no longer

wishes to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the

case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                       PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
5th day of August, 2010.

                                            2