Court Opinion

ID: 9554522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-09 14:11:38.897266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:35:29.362430
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed August 9, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-0571
                      Lower Tribunal No. F14-15090
                          ________________

                             Anzagen Black,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                          The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

     An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C.
Areces, Judge.

      Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger,
Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

      Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Soliz v. State, 18 So. 3d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)

(concluding probationer willfully violated probation terms when evidence

submitted   established    probationer     “had   twenty-one   ‘bracelet    gone

notifications’ and ten insufficient battery alarms”); Palma v. State, 830 So. 2d

201, 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (affirming trial court’s finding that defendant

willfully violated probation where, despite her allegations of mental illness,

defendant had history of violating her probation); see also Harris v. State,

898 So. 2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (determining competent,

substantial evidence supported trial court’s finding of willful probation

violation notwithstanding defendant’s limited intellectual capabilities).

                                       2