Court Opinion

ID: 9769584
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 14:55:01.221458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:05.366922
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The appellant has properly pointed out that the opinion in this case fails to point *736out the fact that the parties had accumulated furniture which was awarded to the appellee. The court was in error in stating that the court costs were awarded against the parties equally. Only the auditor’s fee was taxed against the parties equally. The court costs were adjudged against the appellant.
The appellant also complains that no specific mention was made of his point of error complaining that the trial court erred in disregarding the jury finding in answer to Special Issue No. three. While this point of error was not quoted, it was considered in the opinion and no additional discussion is necessary.
The inaccuracies pointed out require no additional discussion and do not require the entry of a different judgment.
The motion is denied.