Court Opinion

ID: 9682945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:20:03.168385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:43.418341
License: Public Domain

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J.
¶ 32. {concurring). I join the majority opinion in all respects. *475However, I write separately to point out that, had Coakley either pled a defense or filed a counterclaim in the Roadster1 matter when the City originally sought the writ of assistance in Milwaukee Circuit Court, we might view differently the tolling issue presented here. The tolling provisions in Wis. Stat. § 893.13 reference Wis. Stat. § 893.14, which provides that the assertion of a defense or counterclaim tolls the time limit for commencement of an action "until final disposition of the defense or counterclaim." However, neither party has argued that § 893.14 applies here; nor has either party provided the court with any pleading that reveals that Coakley either pled a defense or filed a counterclaim in the Roadster action.

 City of Milwaukee v. Roadster LLC, 2003 WI App 131, 265 Wis. 2d 518, 666 N.W.2d 524.