Court Opinion

ID: 9940293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-13 21:02:20.034247+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:44:43.672791
License: Public Domain

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

                                     Before
                           HACKEL, MIZER, and DALY
                            Appellate Military Judges

                            _________________________

                              UNITED STATES
                                  Appellee

                                         v.

                      Christopher J. DELGADILLO
                      Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy
                                 Appellant

                                 No. 202300237

                            _________________________

                            Decided: 13 February 2024

        Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
                             upon reconsideration

                                  Military Judge:
                                  Ryan J. Sears

     Sentence adjudged 2 August 2023 by a special court-martial convened
     at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting
     alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 50 days and
     a bad-conduct discharge. 1

                                  For Appellant:
                           Major Joshua P. Keefe, USMC

1   Appellant was credited with 50 days of pretrial confinement.
             United States v. Delgadillo, NMCCA No. 202300237
                 Opinion of the Court (upon reconsideration)

                           _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                           _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case,
we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct
in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. 2
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                  FOR THE COURT:

                                  MARK K. JAMISON
                                  Clerk of Court

   2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

                                         2