Court Opinion

ID: 6733419
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:15:28.622814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:41.721877
License: Public Domain

BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant served upon the district attorney a proposed record on appeal on 31 March 1976. On 14 April 1976 the record on appeal was settled by agreement. The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 11(e) provides that “[w] ithin 10 days after the record on appeal has been settled . . . the appellant shall present the items constituting the record on appeal to the clerk of superior court for certification.” Appellant in this case waited until 22 June 1976 to obtain the clerk’s certification, a total of 69 days.
We state once again what was said in Ledwell v. County of Randolph, N. C. App. (filed 17 November 1976); in State v. *595Gillespie, N.C. App. (filed 17 November 1976); and in In Re Allen, N. C. App. (filed 1 December 1976) :
“The time schedules set out in the rules are designed to keep the process of perfecting an appeal to the appellate division flowing in an orderly manner. Counsel is not permitted to decide upon his own enterprise how long he will wait to take his next step in the appellate process. There are generous provisions for extensions of time by the trial court if counsel can show good cause for extension.
“The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. ‘These rules govern procedure in all appeals from the courts of the trial divisions to the courts of the appellate division; . . . ’ App. R. 1(a).”
Appeal dismissed.
Judges Parker and Hedrick concur.