Court Opinion

ID: 3652988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:07:03.846316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:19:19.427216
License: Public Domain

In this case there was no evidence that Lindsay's share of the corn and pork had been set apart for him by Atkinson, and, while so set apart, that the conveyance to the plaintiff was made. Before the plaintiff can recover he must show that the share of Lindsay had been set apart, otherwise the case would rest upon the mere contract of the parties. He must show, in the next place, that after Lindsay's share had been so set apart it was conveyed to him, and before any conversion thereof was made by Atkinson. The evidence does not support either part of the case, and the nonsuit was proper. Let the rule for a new trial be discharged.
(89)