Court Opinion

ID: 994273
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:20:30.663669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:59.954378
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-2531

JOHN A. BRINKLEY,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97-
3090-MJG)

Submitted:   February 12, 1998          Decided:     February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr., No. CA-97-3090-
MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2