Court Opinion

ID: 9905155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-28 21:01:40.537889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:07.771817
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1084      Doc: 18        Filed: 11/27/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1084

        MADHU VERMA; RAVI GOGNA,

                            Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                     and

        KAMAL MUSTAFA,

                            Third Party Plaintiff,

                     v.

        JACQUES FRANCOIS; NADIA ALLEN,

                            Defendants - Appellees,

                     and

        REBECCA ANNE HERR,

                            Trustee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
        Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:22-cv-00452-DKC)

        Submitted: November 21, 2023                              Decided: November 27, 2023

        Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
        Judge.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1084      Doc: 18         Filed: 11/27/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Madhu Verma and Ravi Gogna, Appellants Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1084      Doc: 18        Filed: 11/27/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Madhu Verma and Ravi Gogna appeal the district court’s order denying their motion

        for default judgment and affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their adversary

        proceeding and remanding to the state court the wrongful detainer action that they removed

        to the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Verma v. Francois, No. 8:22-cv-00452-

        DKC (D. Md. Dec. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3