Court Opinion

ID: 7419193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:40:11.639296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:19.000332
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 18 March 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful propose and it is therefore dis*802pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL ánd ERVIN, JJ., concur.