Court Opinion

ID: 3279636
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:53:13.461432+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:54.537784
License: Public Domain

In this action for rent, plaintiff leased certain premises to the defendants, Moran and Nelson, to be used as a saloon, defendant Brewing Company being surety on the lease. One of the clauses of the lease reads as follows: "It is further agreed that the premises are now in a tenantable and good condition, and are fit for the purposes for which they are hereby leased, and that they shall be kept in good condition by and at the expense of the lessees, during the term of this lease. . . ." The answer did not deny that the rent sued *Page 215 
for was due, but alleged the existence of a latent defect in the premises which was not known to the defendants at the time that the property was leased. There is absolutely no showing in the answer that the defect referred to might not have been discovered prior to the making of the stipulation above quoted, and there is no attempt in the pleadings to reframe the lease on the ground of mistake or fraud. Under these circumstances it is clear that the defendants are bound by their stipulation and that the lower court properly gave its judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings.
Judgment affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 11, 1918.