Court Opinion

ID: 9833198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:31:19.336323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:14:10.358768
License: Public Domain

*988On Rehearing.
We were in error in stating that the Jackson and other cases cited were cases resulting in death; so this expression is withdrawn.
We simply intended to note the fact that, under the testimony of the expert witnesses, certain sections of the Mexico Codes applied to railway companies and others to other industrial enterprises in cases of torts, and that those applicable to the latter permit a recovery to persons negligently injured, and that under the evidence it became a question of fact whether the laws in evidence permit a recovery in this case, and that, the question not having been submitted nor requested to be submitted, we must presume, under our statute, that it was resolved in favor of the judgment.
The motion is overruled.