Court Opinion

ID: 2905153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:53:49.57747+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:56.079512
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-05-373 CR

____________________

CARROLL CLARY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 248315

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
	On October 13, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for
want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant
explained why he needed time for filing the record.  The appellant did not file a response. 
It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R.
App. P. 20.2.  There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the
appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
							_____________________________
								STEVE McKEITHEN
								      Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered December 7, 2005 
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.