Court Opinion

ID: 2645094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-12-06 16:10:56.077313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:27.444525
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

                 IN RE SUK KAN OH
          (Real Party in Interest Zinus Inc.)
                ______________________

                        2013-1321
                  ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No.
12/589,961.
                 ______________________

                       JUDGMENT
                  ______________________

    DARIEN K. WALLACE, Imperium Patent Works LLP, of
Pleasanton, California, argued for appellant. With him
on the brief was T. LESTER WALLACE.

     JAMIE L. SIMPSON, Associate Solicitor, Office of the So-
licitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and
WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and HUGHES,
                  Circuit Judges).

         AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 6, 2013               /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk of Court