Court Opinion

ID: 6697555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:57:57.846518+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:17.990306
License: Public Domain

Brogden, J.
Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.
Reversed.