Court Opinion

ID: 9940458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-14 16:04:46.905942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:44:54.244348
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                                State of Florida

                        Opinion filed February 14, 2024.
        Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                             ________________

                              No. 3D23-1148
                        Lower Tribunal No. 14-12750
                           ________________

                            Kenton G. Findlay,
                                   Appellant,

                                      vs.

                     Star Lakes Association, Inc.,
                                   Appellee.

     An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-
Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.

     Kenton G. Findlay, in proper person.

     No appearance, for appellee. 1

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

     GORDO, J.

1
 Appellee was precluded from filing an answer brief after failing to comply
with this Court’s order.
     Kenton G. Findlay (“Findlay”) appeals a non-final order denying his

motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

     On December 6, 2017, an amended final judgment of foreclosure was

entered in favor of Star Lakes Association, Inc. (“Star Lakes”). On May 18,

2023, Findlay filed a “motion for reconsideration,” arguing grounds for

vacating the final judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b).

The trial court denied the motion. This appeal followed.

     Our jurisdiction to review non-final orders is limited to those matters

specifically enumerated in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Mid-

Continent Cas. Co. v. Flora-Tech Plantscapes, Inc., 225 So. 3d 336, 340

(Fla. 3d DCA 2017); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 (stating “[t]his rule

applies to appeals to the district courts of appeal of the nonfinal orders

authorized herein”).   Rule 9.130(a)(5) authorizes appeals of “[non-final]

[o]rders entered on an authorized and timely motion for relief from

judgment.” Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5) (emphasis added).

     In this case, the underlying motion was filed nearly six years after the

trial court entered the amended final judgment of foreclosure. Because the

motion was not timely filed, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b) (stating that a motion for relief from judgment

                                      2
based on newly discovered evidence cannot be filed more than one year

after the judgment was entered).

     Dismissed.

                                   3