Court Opinion

ID: 9424497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:11:46.926114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:50.572906
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice White,
with whom Mr. Justice Black-mun joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The first provision in the decree prohibiting the union from giving or furnishing legal advice to its members or their families is overbroad in light of United Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn., 389 U. S. 217 (1967), and should be narrowed to prohibit only legal advice by nonlawyers. Also, I agree with the Court that the portion of the decree forbidding the setting of fees by union-lawyer agreement cannot stand. Otherwise, however, I do not read the decree as being inconsistent with our prior cases and I would not now extend them to set aside this decree in its entirety.