Court Opinion

ID: 8426167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 02:22:56.910264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:30.789793
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Ronald Rogers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Vancamp, No. CA-03-1111-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED