Court Opinion

ID: 9929898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-05 18:01:07.992655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:52:50.996705
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 22-6197     Document: 010110994811       Date Filed: 02/05/2024    Page: 1
                                                                                  FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                         February 5, 2024
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 22-6197
                                                    (D.C. No. 5:20-CR-00332-SLP-1)
  JOSHUA DECKER,                                              (W.D. Okla.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
                          _________________________________

 Before HOLMES, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
                    _________________________________

       The government moves to enforce Joshua Decker’s appeal waiver. Through

 counsel, Mr. Decker “acknowledges that his appeal waiver is enforceable under the

 standard set out in United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc).”

 Resp. at 1. Based on the parties’ positions and our independent review, we grant the

 motion to enforce the appeal waiver. We dismiss this appeal. This decision does not

 diminish any postconviction rights that Mr. Decker retained in his plea agreement.

                                             Entered for the Court
                                             Per Curiam

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.