Court Opinion

ID: 6132621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 21:21:32.081416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:48.005229
License: Public Domain

BabNAbd, P. J.:
The defendant can only test the actionable quality of the words by the demurrer. If they are ambiguous, or if the sense in which they were used is doubtful and uncertain, but they are capable of a construction which would make them actionable even if an innocent sense could be placed upon them, a question is presented for a jury. Under this rule the demurrer is not well taken.
The plaintiff is a physician. He prescribed for a child of one Alfred Lawrence. The article charges that “ soon after taking the dose the child was seized with convulsions. Two other physicians who were sent for remarked that there was something wrong either in the prescription or its preparation.”
*370The second cause of action is contained in an article which, states that “ the little son of Alexander C. Lawrence who was seized with convulsions a few days ago, immediately after taking some medicine prescribed by Dr. Patch, died on Sunday. Dr. Miller refused to give a certificate as to the cause of death; then Dr. Patch declined to give one. Finally Dr. Miller consented to give one, but stated that if he did so it would be unfavorable to Dr. Patch, so that a coroner’s investigation will probably be made.”
The tendency of the first article is of such a character as to make possible an inference from it that the plaintiff had either mixed the proper medicines improperly, or had prescribed an improper kind of medicine.
The second publication is so framed that it is possible for a jury to find, that the intent of the article is that the plaintiff caused the death of a child by negligence or lack of skill, and_ that on this • account a physician, Dr. Miller, had refused to give a certificate of the cause of death, stating that it would be unfavorable to the plaintiff, and that as a consequence the cause of death would have to be investigated by a coroner. If so found to be, in spirit and intent, the words are actionable, being spoken of a physician.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer, on payment of costs, in twenty days.
PRATT, J., concurred; DtumaN, J., not sitting.
Judgment overruling demurrer to complaint affirmed, with costs, defendant to have leave to answer, on payment of costs, in twenty days.