Court Opinion

ID: 2848355
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 21:22:13.291549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:04.774208
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-05-012-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF

MARGARETE REITMAN, AN

INCAPACITATED ADULT

----------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM
 
OPINION
(footnote: 1) 
AND JUDGMENT

----------

On May 26, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 
38.6(a).  
See
 Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  
See
 T
EX
. R. A
PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this 
appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ. 

DELIVERED: June 23, 2005

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.