Court Opinion

ID: 992474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:52:34.516828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:51.581624
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7698

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GARY ELLIOTT HOKE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District
Judge. (CR-91-1-MU)

Submitted:   June 19, 1997                 Decided:   June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Elliott Hoke, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel-

lant's motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hoke, No. CR-91-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2