Court Opinion

ID: 493754
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:51:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:47.266229
License: Public Domain

828 F.2d 18published Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Ronald L. SUTPHIN, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Olivia J. GARLAND, H.G. Ozinol, M.D., Kurt Fox, M.D., LindaDeola, R.N., and Wayne Rankin, P.A., Defendant--Appellee.
No. 87-6042
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 8, 1987.Decided August 18, 1987.

Ronald L. Sutphin, appellant pro se.
Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Garland.
Elizabeth Morrell Allen, Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees Ozinol, Fox, Deola and Rankin.
Before K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.  Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.  Sutphin v. Garland, C/A No. 85-14-H (E.D. Va., Mar. 3, 1987).

2
AFFIRMED.