Court Opinion

ID: 8468094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 10:31:48.224893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:15.009577
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Harrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrod v. Baumgardner, No. 8:08-cv-03299-DKC, 2009 WL 2151857 (D. Md. filed July 14, 2009, entered July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.