Court Opinion

ID: 1006654
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:19.906193+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:10.406968
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Nardra M. Daniels appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act with prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to particularize her complaint.
  
   See
  
  Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Finding no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Daniels v. Department of the Army,
  
  No. CA-01-513-5-2BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 2001). We modify the dismissal, however, to reflect that it is without prejudice to Daniels’s right to file a new complaint in the district court with the proper factual support. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.