Court Opinion

ID: 1000684
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:44:35.485457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:16.390517
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6971

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
88-378, CA-99-1961)

Submitted:   January 20, 2000             Decided:   January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ghulam Mohammed Nasim seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Nasim, Nos. CR-88-378;

CA-99-1961 (D. Md. July 7, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2