Court Opinion

ID: 4109109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-20 21:01:29.689176+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:09.306929
License: Public Domain

*205
   
  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Rodger Hanson appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motions for summary judgment in this civil rights action, denying Hanson’s motion to appoint counsel, and denying his motiop to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hanson’s motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hanson v. Owens, No. 5:14-ct-03078-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2014; Feb. 10, 2015; Oct. 16, 2015; June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

  AFFIRMED