Court Opinion

ID: 4117964
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-24 17:10:06.69934+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:18.755307
License: Public Domain

Matter of Brooks v Vance (2017 NY Slip Op 00448)

Matter of Brooks v Vance

2017 NY Slip Op 00448

Decided on January 24, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 24, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

2860 1184/14 -4137

[*1]In re Calvin Brooks, Petitioner,
vCyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., et al., Respondent.

Calvin Brooks, petitioner pro se.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. Ellen Biben, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 24, 2017
CLERK