Court Opinion

ID: 9885697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 13:11:14.06596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:55.572746
License: Public Domain

Kupferman, J. (dissenting).
While I would affirm on the decision of Special Term (Asch, J.) as a matter of the proper exercise of discretion, I think it should be pointed out that this court, in reversing, takes a most contradictory position. It first decides that the matter is one for the arbitrator and not for the court. It then inserts itself into the controversy coming to seeming conclusions, albeit erroneously on both counts, about the merits.
Stevens, P. J., Markewich and Lupiano, JJ., concur with Nunez, J.; Kupferman, J., dissents in an opinion.
*126Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 25, 1975, reversed, on the law, and vacated, and the application to stay arbitration denied. Appellant shall recover of respondents $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal.