Court Opinion

ID: 998634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:13:48.260353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:09.281370
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7775

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES ALLEN BULLOCK, a/k/a Man,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-194-D)

Submitted:   April 29, 1999                   Decided:   May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Allen Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James Allen Bullock appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See United States v. Bullock, No. CR-92-194-D

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2