Court Opinion

ID: 9697567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:21:45.284791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:39.726038
License: Public Domain

ROBERTS, Judge
(concurring).
In my view Argo v. Goodstein, 424 Pa. 612, 228 A.2d 195 (1967), was incorrectly decided, see dissenting opinions of Bell, C. J., 424 Pa. at 617, 228 A.2d at 203, Musmanno, J., 424 Pa. at 619, 228 A.2d at 198, and Roberts, J., 424 Pa. 631, 228 A.2d at 197, and is still wrong. It should be overruled. Failing that, the present case at least repudiates some of the unfortunate implications of the language employed in Argo.