Court Opinion

ID: 2937250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 18:33:25.302688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:18.343125
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-19,721-20

CALVIN RAY HYDER, Relator

v.

BEE COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. B-05-M011-PRB IN THE 156TH  JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM BEE COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee County, but that he has not received confirmation of the
filing date or any other response from the district clerk.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District Clerk of 
Bee County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such
habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); by stating that the
nature of the claims asserted in the application filed by Relator is such that the claims are not
cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3; or stating that Relator has not filed an
application for habeas corpus in Bee County.  This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus
shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response.  Such response
shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 6, 2006
Do not publish