Court Opinion

ID: 2896220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:07:24.059004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:38:43.061506
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-06-0304-CR

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                       AT AMARILLO

                                          PANEL C

                                     JANUARY 8, 2007

                           ______________________________

                                OTIS NOBLE, APPELLANT

                                              V.

                           THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                         _________________________________

              FROM THE 227TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY;

              NO. 2005CR3879; HONORABLE PHILIP A. KAZEN, JUDGE

                          _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                               ABATEMENT AND REMAND

       Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Otis Noble, was convicted of possession,

enhanced, and sentenced to twenty years confinement. The clerk’s record was filed on

July 7, 2006, and the reporter’s record was filed on July 28, 2006. Initially, Appellant’s brief

was due on August 28, 2006. Three extensions of time were granted for appointed
counsel to have additional time to research and to complete the brief. In compliance with

Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, counsel was also notified by the

Clerk of this Court on two separate occasions that the deadlines in which to file the brief

had expired. In response to the Clerk’s second notice of November 28, 2006, counsel filed

a fourth motion for extension of time requesting another thirty days to continue his research

and prepare the brief.

       By order of the Court, the fourth motion for extension of time is denied. Instead,

we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2) and (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever

means necessary to determine the following:

       1.     whether Appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
       2.     whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and
       3.     whether Appellant has been denied effective assistance of appointed
              counsel given counsel’s failure to file the brief after being granted
              three extensions of time in which to complete his research.

       Should the trial court determine that Appellant does want to continue the appeal, is

indigent, and that present counsel should be replaced, the trial court shall appoint new

counsel to represent Appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name,

address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an

order appointing counsel. If necessary, the trial court shall execute findings of fact,

conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned

                                             2
issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing, if any, shall also be prepared. The

supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with

the Clerk of this Court on or before February 16, 2007.

      It is so ordered.

                                                Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                            3