Court Opinion

ID: 1005089
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:51:18.725309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:21.863338
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RODERICK EUGENE HARRIS,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-98-16, CA-00-440-1)

Submitted:   August 9, 2001                 Decided:   August 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Eugene Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Timika Shafeek, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Roderick Eugene Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-98-16; CA-00-

440-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 28, 2000; entered Mar. 29, 2001).    We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2