Court Opinion

ID: 9406577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-01 10:11:47.548074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:31.557286
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00150-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

PHYLLIS MARTIN,                                           §   APPEAL FROM THE 402ND
APPELLANT
                                                          §   DISTRICT COURT
V.
                                                          §   WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS
MARVIN STROMBERG, DDS AND
LAKE VIEW DENTAL CENTER,
APPELLEES

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM

         Appellant, Phyllis Martin, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion
states that the parties reached a mutual agreement. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is
granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the
party incurring same.

Opinion delivered June 30, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                 COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                            JUNE 30, 2023

                                        NO. 12-23-00150-CV

                          PHYLLIS MARTIN,
                               Appellant
                                  V.
          MARVIN STROMBERG, DDS AND LAKE VIEW DENTAL CENTER,
                               Appellees

                               Appeal from the 402nd District Court
                          of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2019-292)

       THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party
incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J