Court Opinion

ID: 8436522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:33:52.808318+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.533982
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Crawford seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to the district court in Crawford’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Crawford seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED