Court Opinion

ID: 994542
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:23.001458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:37.976101
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7627

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DENNIS M. HENDERSON,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
96-3753-DKC)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 25, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Elisabeth Ann Sachs, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

second motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Henderson, No. CA-96-
3753-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2