Court Opinion

ID: 8424472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 00:42:29.913048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:28.829692
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Stanley M. Ballenger seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for appointed counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ballenger seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED