Court Opinion

ID: 2794477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-17 05:01:47.335433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:29:10.042981
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 13-405V
                                      Filed: March 25, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                            UNPUBLISHED
A.S., a minor, by her natural mother,         *
NANCY SKOW,                                   *
                                              *
                                              *            Special Master Dorsey
               Petitioner,                    *
                                              *
v.                                            *
                                              *             Joint Stipulation on Damages;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *             Varicella vaccine; Prevnar vaccine;
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *             Lipodystrophy.
                                              *
               Respondent.                    *
                                              *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et. al., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.
Julia W. McInerny, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                            DECISION1

       On June 17, 2013, Nancy Skow (“petitioner”) filed a petition on behalf of her minor child,
A.S., pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to
-34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving Varicella and Prevnar vaccines on April
5, 2011, A.S. suffered from lipodystrophy and other adverse injuries. Stipulation at ¶¶ 2, 4, 6.

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).

2
 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

                                                  1
Further, petitioner alleged that A.S. experienced residual effects of these injuries for more than six
months. Id. at ¶ 4.

        On March 24, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should
be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the Varicella and Prevnar vaccines
caused A.S. to suffer lipodystrophy or any other injury. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree
to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A.

       The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court
in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $35,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Nancy Skow,
       as guardian/conservator of A.S.’s estate. This amount represents compensation for
       all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       Id. at ¶ 8.

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                               s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Special Master

3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                  2