Court Opinion

ID: 711483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:33:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:34:48.759352
License: Public Domain

74 F.3d 1235NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Calvin Scott WEDINGTON, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-7384.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996Decided Jan. 24, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.  (CR-82-86, CA-95-2081-K)
Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.
Maury S. Epner, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and requiring Appellant to pay a filing fee on all future 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motions, unless Appellant can show good cause to the contrary.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Wedington, Nos.  CR-82-86;  CA-95-2081-K (D.Md. Aug. 11, 1995).  We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED