Court Opinion

ID: 5576832
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:26:50.95928+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:57.694251
License: Public Domain

Lumpkin, J.
1. Generally, in the' absence of fraud, the assignee of a bond for title acquires all the rights and equities to which the assignor was entitled thereunder. Walker v. Maddox, 105 Ga. 253 (31 S. E. 165).
2. Where an owner of land made a conveyance of it to secure a loan, taking bond for reconveyance upon payment, and- transferred the bond to another, in the absence of fraud, one who subsequently obtained judgment against the assignor of the bond, and who was not shown to have been a creditor when the transfer was made, did not have the right to subject the land after the payment of the secured debt by the transferee of the bond, the cancellation of the security deed, and the subsequent making of a quitclaim deed by the secured creditor to the transferee. Civil Gode,(§2774.
(a) In Huie v. Loud, 38 Ga. 191, the judgment was against one who purchased land, took bond for title thereto, erected valuable improvements, and sold it to another who, in addition to paying him a sum of money, also paid the balance of the original purchase-money. A deed' was made by the original vendor to the debtor, and one by him to the purchaser *853under him. The judgment was obtained prior to the.sale by the holder of the bond for title to the third person.
Argued February 5,
Decided June 28, 1909.
Claim. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. May 4, 1908.
Ilenry Walker, for plaintiff.
Seaborn & Barry Wright, contra.
3. All questions of fact as well as of law were submitted by consent to the presiding judge without the intervention of a jury; the question of bona fides, the cancellation of the security deed, the meaning of the entry of “satisfied and surrendered” on the bond for title, when it was made relatively to the cancellation of the deed, and who paid the secured debt, were for the judge, and legitimate inferences drawn by him were entitled to the same effect as though found by a jury. It can not he held, as matter of law, that he erred1 in his finding.

Judgment affirmed.

Ail the Justices concur.