Court Opinion

ID: 692472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:16:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:39.344634
License: Public Domain

51 F.3d 268
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.Michael Sewell SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 94-7002, 94-7003, 94-7004.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 21, 1995.Decided April 4, 1995.

Michael Sewell Smith, appellant pro se.  Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Smith v. Angelone, Nos.  CA-91-503-N;  CA-91-504-N;  CA-91-505-N (E.D. Va.  Sept. 8, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.