Court Opinion

ID: 9389388
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-25 17:00:55.917148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:26.836503
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7021      Doc: 15         Filed: 04/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7021

        WAYNE RESPER,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        YESCARE CORP., fka Corizon Health, Inc.; HOLLY HOOVER, NP; SUSAN
        PRYOR; JANICE ROBINSON, R.N.; BRITTANY            HAMLETT; AMY
        BERKEBILE, RN; WILLIAM “BO” RAYNOR, RN; WILLIAM “BILL”
        BEEMAN, RN,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00378-SAG)

        Submitted: April 20, 2023                                         Decided: April 24, 2023

        Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, MARKS, O’NEILL,
        O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7021      Doc: 15         Filed: 04/24/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Wayne Resper initially filed a complaint in state court. Defendants removed the

        case to federal court based upon the federal questions raised. Resper now appeals the

        district court’s order dismissing his federal claims and remanding his state claims to state

        court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

        for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. YesCare Corp., No. 1:22-cv-00378-

        SAG (D. Md. filed Aug. 16, 2022 & entered Aug. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     2