Court Opinion

ID: 833993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 21:02:29.982345+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:33.260895
License: Public Domain

773 N.W.2d 729 (2009)
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry Lee JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 138926. COA No. 288828.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 28, 2009.

Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the *730 sentence of the Oakland Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. The sentence is invalid because the trial court scored 25 points under offense variable 13 based on crimes that were not committed during a five-year period encompassing the sentencing offense. People v. Francisco, 474 Mich. 82, 711 N.W.2d 44 (2006). This Court decided Francisco before the defendant's appellate counsel filed an application for leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals on direct appeal. Therefore, the scoring of OV 13 should have been challenged on direct appeal. On remand, the trial court shall sentence the defendant within the appropriate sentencing guidelines range, or articulate on the record a substantial and compelling reason for departing from the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v. Babcock, 469 Mich. 247, 666 N.W.2d 231 (2003). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.