Court Opinion

ID: 999293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:23:43.056774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:54.225383
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7717

ROY GAREY LINDSEY,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-96-126-10-21BD)

Submitted:   March 31, 1999                 Decided:   July 29, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Garey Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Eric
Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald Roberts, SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.       See Lindsey v. Moore, No. CA-96-

126-10-21BD (D.S.C. July 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                   2