Court Opinion

ID: 871006
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-25 02:00:59.973654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:19.925930
License: Public Domain

,Y,_.,¢~

NO. 29?6S §§
fm
”"‘”1
IN THE SUPREME C©SRT OF THE STATE OF HAWAlt §§
; W>’»'vx.<;
MlCHAEW C. TEERNKY, Petiticner, jm WH
 
vs. §§ 0
-...
orr

 

::LAY':@N FRAN:<, o:z:»;sc';:os, ntz>:iz~z‘ri»;fsn':? or
 or sAwA:‘:, r<@sp<>r~la¢~.:n

ORIGINAL PRGCEEDING
(CR. NO. 08»l*0369}

ORDER

Nakayama, Acoba, Duff and Recktenwald, JJ.

i..ty,

(By: Moon, C.J.,

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael F Tierney's

~»

January 2”, 2010 “motion for release of prisoner pending
disposition of application for habeas corpus,” it appears that
petitioner’s April l5, 2009 petition for a writ of habeas corpus

is not pending before the supreme court in the instant case

inasmuch as the petition was disposed by the April Z2, 2009 order

denying the petition without prejudice to seeking habeas corpus

relief in the circuit court. The fac that petitioner

subsequently sought and was denied habeas corpus relief in the
circuit court did not reinstate petitioner’s April l5, 2009

petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the instant case.

Therefore,
lT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “motion for release of

prisoner pending disposition of application for habeas corpus” is

The dismissal is without prejudice to seeking release

dismissed.
08~l-0869 and

pending appeal from the circuit court in Cr. No.

pursuant to

E§A??`E.`.D: i~~§c;r:»~">l.:.zfiii, ‘:Iawai.i, February l, 201.0.

YBL:‘..»<;¢¢ m 591 ."""f`-s?.h#'“~z‘;~r,,¢.} @;.i"\£¢»

‘//' 

F,<»»»»<»--'» »1‘1><»€@§€@~»

//)’/Mw /@c¢¢c'&/»».»»/({