Court Opinion

ID: 687933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:43:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:04.532170
License: Public Domain

46 F.3d 1124
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Ronald Joseph GOVOSTIS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Sewall SMITH, Warden;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-7001.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.Decided Jan. 18, 1995.

Ronald Joseph Govostis, Appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge.*  Govostis v. Smith, No. CA-93-4027-HAR (D. Md. July 29, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 Appellant attempts to raise on appeal a claim that the conviction counts were not merged as required by state law.  Because the issue was not presented to the district court, it is not properly before us.  Singleton v. Wulff, U.S. 106, 120 (1976)