Court Opinion

ID: 9878599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 17:27:16.636361+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:06.177813
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in the substantive issues raised by Appellants and affirm the final judgment without further discussion. However, because the trial court inadvertently entered duplicate judgments,* we remand for the court to strike the later-entered judgment. See Diecidue v. Lewis, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D376, 223 So.3d 1015, 2017 WL 535447 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 10, 2017); Sound Builders of St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Hanlon, 439 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR; WINSOR, J„ CONCURRING WITH OPINION.

 The original judgment was filed with the clerk on September 8, 2016, at 11:03 a.m. and it was recorded in the official records (book 17701, pages 2137-47) on the same date. The duplicate judgment was filed with the clerk on September 8 at 2:23 p.m., but it was not recorded in the official records (book 17705, pages 535-45) until September 12.