Court Opinion

ID: 9892374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-23 18:00:52.026347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:17.294417
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-20498         Document: 00516940025             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/23/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                               Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                                           FILED
                                                                                      October 23, 2023
                                       No. 22-20498
                                      ____________                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                             Clerk
   Pamela Love,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellant,

                                             versus

   University of Saint Thomas,

                                                Defendant—Appellee.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:20-CV-176
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Graves, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          Pamela Love appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment
   to the University of Saint Thomas in Houston, her former employer, in her
   action for discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights
   Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. This court has considered this appeal on
   the basis of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-20498     Document: 00516940025         Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/23/2023

                                  No. 22-20498

   the judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the district
   court’s order. AFFIRMED.

                                       2