Court Opinion

ID: 36064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:36:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:33.723381
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                                     Fifth Circuit
                                                                                                    F I L E D
                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                        FIFTH CIRCUIT                                               August 11, 2004
                                    _______________________
                                                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                                       Clerk
                                              No. 03-21169
                                        _______________________

                                In The Matter Of: ANNA MARIE LUCAS

Debtor

                      ----------------------------------------

                                         BEN B. FLOYD, Trustee,
                                                                                                      Appellant,

                                                     versus

                    ASHLEIGH NICOLE LUCAS; CRYSTAL ANNA LUCAS;
                    BRANDY MARIE LUCAS; STEPHEN WADE LUCAS, JR.,

                                                                                                      Appellees.

______________________________________________________________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                                 (No. H-02-CV-4793)
______________________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

         After studying the briefs and record, we are convinced that the result in this case is

controlled by our precedent in the Matter of Simpson, 36 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 1994). We recognize

         *
              Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and
is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
that there are slight differences between the two cases, but find no meaningful basis to distinguish

Simpson. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.