Court Opinion

ID: 9397695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-26 00:00:57.150278+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:27.050338
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50768       Document: 00516764259             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/25/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                    ____________
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                     No. 22-50768
                                   Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                   ____________                                 May 25, 2023
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                        Clerk

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                           versus

   Marcus Orosco,

                                             Defendant—Appellant.
                    ______________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:22-CR-61-2
                    ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Orosco has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Orosco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          _____________________
          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
   should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
   forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-50768     Document: 00516764259         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/25/2023

                                  No. 22-50768

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2