Court Opinion

ID: 5317635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 04:17:54.968292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:17.646264
License: Public Domain

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that the testimony shows that there was a guaranty by defendant A. Brody & Sons, Inc., of the account of Edwin S. Buckley; that such guaranty was within the Statute of Frauds,* and that there was not a direct promise to pay, based upon a new consideration. Finding of fact 10 contains an inconsistent statement of facts, and the part more favorable to appellants, and which states that a guaranty was made, should be accepted.

 See Pers. Prop. Law, § 31.— [Rep.