Court Opinion

ID: 9397857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-26 19:00:47.501796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:28.271870
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11257     Document: 13-1       Date Filed: 05/26/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                      In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eleventh Circuit

                            ____________________

                                    No. 23-11257
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                            ____________________

       LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
                                                        Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       ROBIN C. LEMONIDIS,
       LORI TODD,
       Oﬃcial Capacities,
       F. BARBERI,
       Oﬃcer, Oﬃcial Capacity,
       E. MCKINNON,
       DAVID GILLESPIE,
       Oﬃcial Capacities, et al.,
USCA11 Case: 23-11257     Document: 13-1      Date Filed: 05/26/2023    Page: 2 of 3

       2                      Opinion of the Court                23-11257

                                                    Defendants-Appellees.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01783-RBD-DCI
                           ____________________

       Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to ﬁle a no-
       tice of appeal on or before June 20, 2022, which was the next busi-
       ness day after 30 days following the date judgment was deemed
       entered on the district court’s December 20, 2021 dismissal order.
       Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). How-
       ever, Lindberg did not ﬁle a notice of appeal until April 8, 2023.
              Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
       Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
       ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
       pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
       1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
       appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
       entertain an appeal that is out of time).
USCA11 Case: 23-11257    Document: 13-1     Date Filed: 05/26/2023   Page: 3 of 3

       23-11257             Opinion of the Court                      3

             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
       hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.