Court Opinion

ID: 996310
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:49:08.824073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.625418
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6946

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HERBERT COUNCIL,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-97-P, CA-97-208-P)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Herbert Council seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Council’s motion

for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Council, Nos. CR-92-97-P; CA-97-208-P (W.D.N.C.

Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2