Court Opinion

ID: 3075298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:08:22.319386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:32.981388
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                            ____________________
                               NO. 09-13-00171-CR
                            ____________________

                    DWIGHT LEJAMES ELAM, Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                ______________

                    On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                           Jefferson County, Texas
                          Trial Cause No. 12-14928
________________________________________________________               _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Dwight LeJames Elam pleaded guilty, under a plea agreement, to the lesser

included offense of misdemeanor assault, class A. The trial court placed him on

deferred adjudication community supervision. Elam violated the terms and

conditions of community supervision set by the court. The State filed a motion to

revoke. The trial court revoked the community supervision, adjudicated Elam

guilty of the offense, and sentenced him to one year in county jail.

                                          1
      Elam’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error.

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967);

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an

extension of the time for Elam to file a pro se response. We received no response.

      We have reviewed the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and the Anders

brief, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support an

appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

      AFFIRMED.

                                        ____________________________________
                                                  DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                       Justice

Submitted on September 16, 2013
Opinion Delivered September 25, 2013
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

                                          2