Court Opinion

ID: 9809289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:07:10.901823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:49.450704
License: Public Domain

Hewdersoñ, Chief-Justice
disseni/enfe. — Í most fully concur with the court, that the amendment should be *206ma(]e — for it presents no new statement of issuablefucts. ^or ^iavc ^ the £ea-st doubt, that this, a substantial amend-. ment, falls under the meaning of the act of 1790. But I think, that the amendment should be made without giving the defendant costs. For I cannot consent to give that, which the defendant, cannot with a safe conscience,, receive.
Per Curiam. — Judgment aeeirmed.