Court Opinion

ID: 4797233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-20 21:07:42.080455+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:01.641877
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.2004) (“Under the circumstances of this case, a defendant would be required to allege what testimony defense counsel could have elicited from witnesses and how defense counsel’s failure to call, interview, or present the witnesses who would have so testified prejudiced the case.”).