Court Opinion

ID: 4045862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-28 23:58:32.612049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:29:57.541963
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                  No. 06-15-00047-CV

            LOWELL MERRITT, Appellant

                           V.

             JAMES ANDREWS, Appellee

        On Appeal from the 170th District Court
              McLennan County, Texas
            Trial Court No. 2015-2602-4

      Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
        Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Lowell Merritt has attempted to appeal from an order entered by the 170th Judicial District

Court of McLennan County1 dismissing his lawsuit.

        A bit of background is necessary to an understanding of the issues raised by this appeal.

On October 9, 2009, Merritt (1) was declared a vexatious litigant by the 380th Judicial District

Court of Collin County, Texas, with respect to certain parties, including James Andrews, and (2)

was subjected to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies

Code with respect to any litigation filed against those certain parties, again, including Andrews.2

As the style of the case at issue suggests, Merritt filed a lawsuit against Andrews in McLennan

County. As a result of the October 2009 Collin County vexatious litigant order, Merritt was

required to obtain permission from the local administrative law judge of McLennan County prior

to filing suit against Andrews.3

1
 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas
Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We
are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Tenth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant
issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.

2
 See TEX CIV. PRAC. AND REM. CODE ANN. § 11.101 (West Supp. 2014); List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to a
Prefiling Order, TEXAS JUDICIAL BRANCH, http://www.txcourts.gov/judicial-data/vexatious-litigants.aspx (last visited
Sept. 16, 2015); Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions, Lowell Merritt v. Robert J. Davis, No. 380-1387-
2009 (380th Jud. Dist. Ct. Collin Cnty. Sept. 17, 2009), available at http://www.txcourts.gov/All_Archived_
Documents/JudicialInformation/oca/pdf/vex/LowellMerrittAmended.pdf. We take judicial notice of both the List of
Vexatious Litigants Subject to a Prefiling Order and the 380th Judicial District Court of Collin County’s order
declaring Merritt a vexatious litigant.
3
 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(a) (West Supp. 2014); Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for
Sanctions, Lowell Merritt v. Robert J. Davis, No. 380-1387-2009 (380th Jud. Dist. Ct. Collin Cnty. Sept. 17, 2009),
available at http://www.txcourts.gov/All_Archived_Documents/JudicialInformation/oca/pdf/vex/LowellMerritt
Amended.pdf.

                                                         2
           Merritt failed to obtain permission from the McLennan County administrative law judge

prior to filing suit. Technically, under Section 11.103(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, the McLennan County District Clerk should not have filed Merritt’s lawsuit in the first place

without proof that Merritt had obtained the required permission to file it.4 We note, however, that

it would be incredibly difficult for the trial court clerks of this State to police vexatious litigant

filings on the front end, and it appears that the Texas Legislature recognized this reality as well as

evidenced by Section 11.1035 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which sets forth a

procedure for handling mistaken filings.5

           After following the procedures outlined by Section 11.1035, the trial court,6 acting in its

role as administrative law judge, refused to retroactively grant Merritt permission to file his lawsuit

against Andrews and, acting in its role as the judge presiding over this matter, dismissed the lawsuit

in accordance with Section 11.1035(b).7 Merritt filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order

of dismissal.

           Section 11.1035(c) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code states, “An order

dismissing litigation that was mistakenly filed by a clerk may not be appealed.” 8 By letter dated

September 2, 2015, we informed Merritt of this statute and advised him that our jurisdiction is

4
    See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2014).
5
    See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035 (West Supp. 2014).
6
 Judge Ralph T. Strother is the McLennan County Administrative Law Judge, and he presided over this case as the
trial judge as well.
7
    See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035(b).
8
    See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035(c).

                                                         3
constitutional and statutory in nature.9 We further afforded Merritt the opportunity to demonstrate

grounds for continuing the appeal in light of the Texas Legislature’s unequivocal statement that

we are without jurisdiction to decide the matter. Merritt responded, but his response failed to

establish how we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

           Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                         Ralph K. Burgess
                                                         Justice

Date Submitted:             September 23, 2015
Date Decided:               September 24, 2015

9
    See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220 (West 2004).
                                                         4