Court Opinion

ID: 9486212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 11:41:10.084934+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:35.047964
License: Public Domain

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I do not agree that we are without jurisdiction to review this sentence. It seems to me that Judge Rovner acted under the compulsion of Thomas I, the law of the case, and did not exercise her discretion.
I do, however, agree that Judge Rovner complied with the law of the case and therefore that the sentence must be affirmed on the merits. While the logic of United States v. Calle, 796 F.Supp. 853 (D.Md.1992) seems appealing, Calle does not reflect the weight *738of authority, which seems to support the analysis of Thomas I.