Court Opinion

ID: 679018
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:29:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:14.716123
License: Public Domain

36 F.3d 1094
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Wayne Maurice BYRD, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6308.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 1994Decided Sept. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.  (CR-90-350, CA-93-3969-H)
Wayne Maurice Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.
William Warren Hamel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Byrd, Nos.  CR-90-350;  CA-93-3969-H (D. Md. Mar. 9, 1994).  We deny Appellant's motion for stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED