Court Opinion

ID: 8671780
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 23:29:27.032218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:20.996760
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ricky Dodd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a *556sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dodd, No. 2:96-cr-00153-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 21, 2008; entered May 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.