Court Opinion

ID: 9705167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 00:58:33.775324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:07:13.622021
License: Public Domain

WOLLMAN, Justice
(concurring specially)-
I join in reversing the denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that because the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, and Nachtigall v. Erickson, 1970, 85 S.D. 122, 178 N.W.2d 198, especially with respect to establishing a factual basis for the plea, defendant’s post-plea assertion of innocence, coupled with any lack of prejudice to the state, was a sufficient basis upon which to require the trial court to grant the motion. I would go no further than this.