Court Opinion

ID: 989102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:02:06.156285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:39.510586
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7598

WINSTON LLOYD,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Secretary of Public Safety
and Correctional Services; RICHARD A. LANHAM,
SR., Commissioner of Corrections,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
95-943-PJM)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Lloyd v. Robinson, No. CA-95-943-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 18, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2