Court Opinion

ID: 4911413
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-16 13:24:11.078866+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:11.153075
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.]

                     CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MAHIN.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3195.]
(No. 2020-0469—Submitted September 15, 2021—Decided September 16, 2021.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, John Edward Mahin, Attorney
Registration No. 0011253, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 19, 2020,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent
from the practice of law for a period of two years, with second year stayed on
condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mahin, 160 Ohio St.3d
424, 2020-Ohio-4098, 157 N.E.3d 750.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,
and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.
                                  _________________