Court Opinion

ID: 9389818
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-26 15:04:07.903433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:29.924952
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 26, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                              No. 3D22-273
                        Lower Tribunal No. 21-6474
                           ________________

                            Noham Kilinsky,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                      Bank Leumi Le-Israel, Ltd,
                                  Appellee.

    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William
Thomas, Judge.

     Law Offices of David S. Cohen, LC, and Lee N. Bernbaum and David
S. Cohen (Orlando), for appellant.

     The Lieberman Law Firm, P.A., and Mendy Lieberman, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and MILLER, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed.    See § 55.606(1)(b)(3), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing in

pertinent part: “The out-of-country foreign judgment shall not be refused

recognition for lack of personal jurisdiction if . . . [t]he defendant, prior to the

commencement of the proceedings, had agreed to submit to the jurisdiction

of the foreign court with respect to the subject matter involved. . .”); Kramer

v. von Mitschke-Collande, 5 So. 3d 689, 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (once a

judgment creditor presents a foreign judgment which on its face awards a

monetary sum certain and is final, conclusive, and capable of enforcement,

the burden shifts to the judgment debtor to specify and establish a ground

for non-recognition of that foreign judgment).           See also Vuillermin v.

Mitsubishi Elec. Europe BV, 233 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding a

defendant “may not avoid the foreign judgment based on lack of personal

service [where] he failed to raise the issue initially in the foreign court of

competent jurisdiction”).

                                         2