Court Opinion

ID: 9393414
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-10 06:08:34.060744+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:53.153440
License: Public Domain

DENY and Opinion Filed May 3, 2023

                                       In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00226-CV

    IN RE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON AS
    SUBSCRIBING POLICY NO. CSN0002623 (INCLUDING “TOKIO
    MARINE KILN SYNDICATE 1880” AND “TOKIO MARINE KILN
               SYNDICAE 510”), ET AL., Relators

          Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-08222

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove
                           Opinion by Justice Molberg
      In their March 10, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators complain that

the trial court abused its discretion by (1) ordering relators to produce allegedly

privileged documents without performing an in camera inspection and (2) holding

relators in criminal contempt without due process.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief generally requires relators to demonstrate that

the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that

relators have failed to show their entitlement to mandamus relief.

      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). We also lift the stay issued by our March 14, 2023 order.

230226f.p05                                /Ken Molberg//
                                           KEN MOLBERG
                                           JUSTICE

                                        –2–