Court Opinion

ID: 9400748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-09 09:11:15.338919+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:47.639393
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                          TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                 No. 10-18-00221-CR

DARYL JOE,
                                                            Appellant
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                            Appellee

                           From the 13th District Court
                             Navarro County, Texas
                           Trial Court No. D37693-CR

                    DISSENTING OPINION ON REMAND

      I am unable to identify a legally appropriate distinction between the facts and legal

analysis in the majority and concurring opinions in Lang v. State, 561 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.

Crim. 2018), from the relevant facts and appropriate legal analysis that would, therefore,

apply and bind us in this appeal. Applying Lang, we should move to requiring the parties

to brief the appropriate remedy. I respectfully dissent.

                                         TOM GRAY
                                         Chief Justice

Dissenting opinion delivered and filed June 7, 2023