Court Opinion

ID: 4919654
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-22 00:15:34.737026+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:00.701796
License: Public Domain

Whitfield, J.
Wetherford was tried in the Criminal Court of'Becord for Hillsborough County upon an information filed January 4, 1918, charging in one count that on February 15, 1916, in said county he did unlawfully and feloniously desert and abandon Ms wife and minor daughter; and in another count that he did unlawfully and feloniously withhold the means of support from his wife and minor child. He was convicted under the latter count and took writ of error.
The statute, Section 1, Chapter 6483, Acts of 1913, contains a provision that any man who shall in this State withhold from his wife and child, or either of them, the means of support, shall be punished as stated therein, with a proviso that no husband shall be prosecuted under this Section for withholding from his wife where there is existing, at the time- of such desertion, such cause or causes as are recognized as ground or grounds for divorce, by Statute, in this State.
There is evidence that a cause of divorce existed. The court charged the jury that if they found from the evidence that' the defendant withheld from his . daughter means of support, they should convict him, stating “you see each count embraces both parties, but if he is guilty of any charge made in either-count, he is guilty under that count; if he is not guilty under either charge in either count, then he is not guilty under either count and you would acquit him.” And refused a requested charge *344that “if you find that the defendant deserted or withheld the means of support from the minor child, the form of your verdict will be: ‘We, the jury, find that the defendant deserted and withheld the means of support from the minor- child.’ ”
The charges given were confusing and harmful to the defendant, since on the evidence the jury may have found the defendant not guilty as to the wife, but guilty of withholding support from the daughter, in which case the jury should so state in the verdict.
Reversed.
Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.