Court Opinion

ID: 9609902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 03:33:08.903238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:53.617996
License: Public Domain

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge,
dissenting.
I do not believe that the Idaho Legislature intended to include within the ambit of “the determination of proceedings following an appeal,” a discretionary review before the United States Supreme Court by way of writ of certiorari. Rather, I perceive the thrust of I.C. # 19-4902 as confined to proceedings within the court structures of the State of Idaho insofar as triggering the one-year statute of limitations for purposes of filing a post-conviction act proceeding. A post-judgment writ of certiorari is simply not part of the normal appellate processes leading to the finality of a conviction as contemplated by the statute.
Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.