Court Opinion

ID: 9414701
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 16:00:51.982207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:57.367712
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-1483
                         ___________________________

                             United States of America,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                           v.

                                   Jamil Barhoumi,

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                        ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: July 10, 2023
                               Filed: August 2, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Jamil Barhoumi appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 12 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave to
withdraw and filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence.

      1
       The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
       Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Barhoumi. There is no indication that the court gave
significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor or committed a clear error of
judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910,
914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923
(8th Cir. 2006); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004). The
revocation prison sentence was below the statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(3).

      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
                     ______________________________

                                         -2-