Court Opinion

ID: 9867979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 17:20:36.882926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:35.802335
License: Public Domain

*17Parker, Ch. J., and Gray and Werner, JJ.
(dissenting), say : When this case was before the Appellate Division that court unanimously reached the conclusion that observance of the rule of store decisis required a reversal of the judgment. Perry v. Rogers (157 N. Y. 251); Capasso v. Woolfolk (163 N. Y. 472); Di Vito v. Orage (165 N. Y. 378) were some of the cases that seemed to it to compel the decision made. A re-examination of these familiar cases persuades us that both in their letter and spirit they did support and command the judgment reached.
Therefore we vote to affirm the judgment.
Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ., concur with Yann, J.; Parker, Ch. J., Gray and Werner, JJ., dissent in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.