Court Opinion

ID: 8841803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 16:44:10.521175+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:13.689032
License: Public Domain

Benedict, J.
I am unable to discover any ground upon which the Panama can be relieved from responsibility for the collision which gave rise to this action. If the movements of the Kanawha were as testified to by those who directed her movements, the liability of the Panama is conceded; and, if the movements of the Panama were as testified to by those who directed her movements, and the movements of the Kanawha were as testified to by these same witnesses, a similar result must follow; for the case sought to be made by the Panama is this: The steam-ship Panama and the steam-ship Kanawha were approaching nearly head on, upon opposite courses. The law required the vessels to pass port to port. The Panama determined to pass starboard to starboard. Accordingly she blew a signal of two whistles to the Kanawha, and, without waiting for the assent of the Kanawha, starboarded her wheel, and swung to the eastward. Soon she observed that the Kanawha, instead of star-boarding her wheel, had ported. The Panama then ported, but it was too late to avoid collision. This makes a case of fault on the part of the Panama. Contrary to the rule, she starboarded her helm, and swung to the eastward, without any assent from the Kanawha to that method of passing. Not receiving assent, she changed again, and ported, but then it was too late. The time lost in the attempt to pass starboard to starboard made the porting, when it occurred, too late to avoid collision. The libelant must have a decree, with an order of reference.