Court Opinion

ID: 9479643
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 07:24:15.503815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:47:10.532381
License: Public Domain

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
Based on the evidence in this case, it seems clear to me that Martinez was dealing only with Amar, that he knew perfectly well he was dealing only with Amar, and that his attempt to hold Arrow liable is nothing more than a convenient afterthought. More importantly, an experienced and able district judge, intimately familiar with the case, reviewed the evidence and reached a similar conclusion. Because I do not believe the district court erred in concluding that on this evidence a reasonable jury could not find Arrow liable to Martinez, I respectfully dissent from our Court’s decision reversing the district court’s grant of Arrow’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.