Court Opinion

ID: 9659380
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 21:43:05.797855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:07.380187
License: Public Domain

FRANK, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I agree with all but one paragraph of the foregoing. It seems to me that the Commission’s third reason was also, independently, a sufficient ground for its order. For I think it within the province of the Commission to make case-to-case determinations of the adequacy of the applicant’s arrangements necessary to insure that the applicant will have a competent staff, if its application is granted. I think that the Commission could properly hold that the testimony of Murray Mester, to which my colleagues refer, gave insufficient assurance on that score, and that such a conclusion is not subject to judicial scrutiny.