Court Opinion

ID: 9590687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:57:35.944077+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:19.451868
License: Public Domain

Carley, Chief Judge,
dissenting.
I join Judge Birdsong’s dissent. However, I want to point out that unlike Richardson v. Palmour Court Apts., 170 Ga. App. 204 (316 SE2d 770) (1984), there were no averments in this case that, in response to the complaints by the appellant concerning the stairway, the appellee made any assurances or promises. Thus, Richardson is distinguishable and the trial court’s judgment was correct for the rea*33sons set forth in Judge Birdsong’s dissent.