Court Opinion

ID: 1004044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:35:20.758953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:30.301802
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Ann M. Beaty appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s Fed.
   
   *83
   
  R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion in her civil action in which she alleges claims of employment discrimination based upon disability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Beaty v. Palmetto Bank,
  
  No. CA-99-1271-6-24AK (D.S.C. Sept. 13
  
   &
  
  Oct. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.