Court Opinion

ID: 3920334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:47:30.424413+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:28.866327
License: Public Domain

The grounds of appellee's motion, for the purpose of striking the statement of facts from this record, are the same grounds, literally recited in the same language, as were considered by us in the opinion on the motion in the case of Security Trust  Life Insurance Company v. R. T. Stuart (No. 525) 160 S.W. 108, decided at this term. The statement of facts in this record is one prepared by the county judge on account of the disagreement of counsel, and the only recognition in this record of a stenographer appearing in the case in that capacity is in the certificate of the county judge, wherein he states that, the parties having "failed to agree on a *Page 290 
statement of facts in this case, having submitted to me their respective statements, I have from their statements and the stenographer's notes,
and from my recollection, prepared the above and foregoing statement," etc. It will be remembered that the county judge appoints and qualifies the official stenographer upon the application of either party to the suit. This stenographer may have been an official stenographer or a private stenographer whose notes were used by the court. We are inclined to the opinion that the recitation in the certificate is not a sufficient statement of a recorded fact that an official stenographer was appointed, and served as such in this cause; and, if that is true, the opinion in the case of Security Trust  Life Insurance Company v. Stewart, above mentioned, in all things controls.
The motion to strike the statement is overruled.
HALL, J., not sitting.