Court Opinion

ID: 9588224
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:31:32.387324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:15.727464
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Judge
(concurring in part; dissenting in part) :
I concur in that part of this decision that under the facts and circumstances in this case there was sufficient evidence to warrant the revocation of the suspended sentence, i. e., intoxication and disturbing the peace at midnight in the manner indicated.
However, I dissent to that part of the Opinion which states: “All cases to the contrary are expressly overruled.” In my opinion, each case concerning the revocation of probation must be considered on its own merits. Such a blanket statement is too likely to be misconstrued; so, I therefore respectfully dissent to that part of this decision.