Court Opinion

ID: 424848
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:31:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:52.120519
License: Public Domain

717 F.2d 492
Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Departmentof Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State ofCalifornia, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 77-2409.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1983.Decided Oct. 3, 1983.

Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner.
William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice;  Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief.
Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3291, 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (U.S.1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir.1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.