Court Opinion

ID: 9908889
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-12 01:00:40.842707+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:34.937628
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-50089         Document: 00516996946             Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/11/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                      ____________                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                                        FILED
                                       No. 23-50089                             December 11, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Marvin Alexander Tut-Cucul,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-671-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Marvin Alexander Tut-Cucul
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tut-Cucul has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-50089    Document: 00516996946         Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/11/2023

                                 No. 23-50089

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2