Court Opinion

ID: 9460982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 22:03:39.749911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:50.896512
License: Public Domain

. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROBB, Circuit Judge:
In their motion for rehearing the appellants claim the prosecutor “misinformed” the trial court as to the contents of the affidavit supporting the warrant for the arrest of Mrs. Gibson. This contention is now made for the first time by the appellants. According to them the prosecutor erroneously said the affidavit stated that a description of Mrs. Porter’s rings, given by the informant before the arrest, was corroborated by Mrs. Porter’s relative. The appellants say they “are unable to find any of this matter in the affidavit, which is in the court record.”
The appellants cite a colloquy appearing on pages 233 and 234 of the trial transcript which they say reflects the prosecutor’s misrepresentation.
*443In the colloquy cited by the appellants the prosecutor was speaking of the affidavit in support of a search warrant for Mrs. Gibson’s apartment. This affidavit, which is in the record as Court’s Exhibit 6, does contain the matter referred to by the appellants. The arrest warrant was supported by a separate affidavit, Court Exhibit 7. There was no misrepresentation by the prosecutor.
The motion for rehearing is denied.