Court Opinion

ID: 8030351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:06:20.052633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:57.229333
License: Public Domain

On December 3, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of eight (8) years, with six (6) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession with Intent to Distribute, a felony.
On April 3, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant appeared via video conference and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 3rd day of April, 2009.
DATED this 21st day of April, 2009.
Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.