Court Opinion

ID: 9411927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-28 16:01:52.956287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:18.860984
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
        For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________

            No. 23-1006
    ___________________________

               Michael Fiorito

   lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

                       v.

               Warden J. Fikes

   lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
      ___________________________

            No. 23-1007
    ___________________________

               Michael Fiorito

   lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

                       v.

            Lele June, Wardens

   lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
      ___________________________

            No. 23-1008
    ___________________________

               Michael Fiorito

   lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant
                                          v.

                                  Warden Thomas

                       lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
                                       ____________

                    Appeals from United States District Court
                          for the District of Minnesota
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: July 25, 2023
                                Filed: July 28, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In these consolidated appeals involving three separate 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas
proceedings, Michael Fiorito challenges the district court’s1 November 2, 2022 order
denying his petitions, all of which asserted claims related to his confinement at the
Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minnesota, between September 2021
and May 2022. Having carefully reviewed the record, including Fiorito’s current
position that his conditions-of-confinement claims and his claims related to his
confinement in the Special Housing Unit are moot, we dismiss Appeal Nos. 23-1006
and 23-1007. As to Appeal No. 23-1008, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons
explained by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot Fiorito’s
pending motion to supplement the record.
                        ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota.

                                          -2-