Court Opinion

ID: 3215662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-22 00:01:33.200589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:11.491892
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-11126      Document: 00513556885         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/21/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 15-11126
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            June 21, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DERRICK DEON BRICE,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:14-CR-172-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Derrick Deon Brice raises
arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145-
46 (5th Cir. 2013), United States v. Luna, 165 F.3d 316, 319 (5th Cir. 1999),
and United States v. Trejo, 610 F.3d 308, 312-13 (5th Cir. 2010). In Alcantar,
we rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct.
2566 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting challenges to the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-11126    Document: 00513556885     Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/21/2016

                                 No. 15-11126

constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 146. Because § 922(j) is
substantially similar to § 922(g), the same result is reached with respect to
Brice’s challenge to it. See Luna, 165 F.3d at 319. Finally, in Trejo, we applied
the plain error standard to a factual sufficiency claim that was raised for the
first time in this court. 610 F.3d at 313.
      Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, its alternative motion for extension of time is DENIED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                        2