Court Opinion

ID: 2939606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 21:50:17.452179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:49.006028
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR-51,047-03

EX PARTE MICHAEL ROY TONEY

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 
CAUSE NO. 0676220D IN THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT
TARRANT COUNTY

 Per Curiam.  MEYERS, J., dissents.  
 

O R D E R

	This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the
provisions of Article 11.071, Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
	On May 25, 1999, Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder.  The jury
answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Article 37.071, Tex. Code Crim. Proc.,
and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death.  This Court affirmed Applicant's
conviction and sentence on direct appeal.  Toney v. State, No. AP-73,535 (Tex. Crim. App.
May 22, 2002).  In Applicant's initial writ, Ex parte Toney, No. WR-51,047-01, relief was
denied on June 26, 2002.  Applicant's first subsequent application, Ex parte Toney, No. WR-51,047-02, was dismissed on October 27, 2004. 
 Applicant presented seven allegations in his application.  We held that these
allegations satisfied the requirements of Article 11.071, section 5, of the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure, and we remanded them to the trial court for consideration.  After
remand, the trial court signed "Agreed Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law"
recommending that relief be granted on Applicant's Brady claims.  Brady v. Maryland, 373
U.S. 83 (1963).  Accordingly, Claims One through Five are filed and set, and relief is granted
in a separate opinion. See Ex parte Toney, AP-76,056 (Tex. Crim. App. December 17, 2008). 
Claims Six and Seven are denied.     
	IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008.

Do Not Publish