Court Opinion

ID: 9553376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:28:41.141442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:30:57.685924
License: Public Domain

*198RICHARDSON, J.
For the reasons stated in and dissenting opinion in People v. Wingo, ante, p. 169 [121 Cal.Rptr. 97, 534 P.2d 1001], I concur in the judgment in this case, but do not join the majority in imposing upon the Adult Authority an obligation to fix irrevocably a prisoner’s maximum term of imprisonment “within a reasonable time” after the prisoner has. “challenged” his sentence as cruel or unusual punishment.
McComb, J., concurred.
Respondent’s petition for a rehearing was denied June 4, 1975. Clark, J., and Richardson, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.