Court Opinion

ID: 2894474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 23:01:13.980986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:11.390862
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-05-0444-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL B

                               FEBRUARY 14, 2006
                         ______________________________

                            ADAM GRANADO, APPELLANT

                                           V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
                       _________________________________

              FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;

                     NO. 3696; HONORABLE RON ENNS, JUDGE
                        _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

                           ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

      Appellant Adam Granado has appealed his conviction and sentence following his

conviction for money laundering and assessment of punishment that includes a five year

sentence in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, which was

probated for 10 years. A copy of a notice of appeal was filed with this Court on December

8, 2005. The clerk’s record was filed on January 3, 2006 and the reporter’s record has not

been filed. David Martinez was trial counsel and no appellate counsel has been appointed.
         The court reporter’s record was due to be filed on January 2, 2006. An extension

motion was filed on January 11, 2006 indicating that appellant had not submitted a request

for preparation of the record. The clerk of this court sent a letter, dated January 11, 2006,

to the court reporter and to appellant notifying him that the record had not been filed and

he should certify to this court that he requested the reporter’s record by January 23, 2006.

That letter has been returned to this court marked “return to sender, moved left no address,

unable to forward.”

         The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent

defendants, as well as the authority to relieve or replace counsel. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC .

ANN . arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(c) (Vernon 2005 & Supp. 2005). See also Enriquez v. State, 999
S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex.App.–Waco 1999, no pet.). Accordingly, we now abate this appeal

and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. TEX . R. APP. P. 43.6.

         Upon remand the trial court shall immediately conduct such hearings as may be

necessary to determine the following, causing proper notice of any such hearing to be

given:

         1.     whether appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal and is indigent
                and entitled to appointed counsel.

         Should it be determined that appellant desires to continue the appeal, then the trial

court shall also take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective

assistance of counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If

                                               2
new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number

of counsel shall be included in the order appointing new counsel.

      The trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as

the court may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings and

conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental reporter's

record of any hearing shall also be included in the appellate record. The trial court shall

file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk

of this Court by March 14, 2006.

       It is so ordered.

                                                        Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                            3