Court Opinion

ID: 8151356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:33:20.277326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:35.596718
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the *717want of a properly presented federal question, Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-198; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633-635; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 362-363; and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, 247 U. S. 350, 353; Chicago Great Western Ry. v. Kendall, 266 U. S. 94, 99; Southern Ry. Co. v. Watts, 260 U. S. 519, 526-527.
Mr. James G. Martin for appellant.
Mr. Harry W. Hart for appellees.