Court Opinion

ID: 5916437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:13:17.074633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:12.579900
License: Public Domain

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.21) and conspiracy in the second degree (Penal Law § 105.15) based upon his constructive possession of 15 ounces of heroin found in a locker at a bus station in downtown Buffalo. The principal prosecution witness at defendant’s trial was John Glenn, the courier who transported the heroin from Los Angeles to Buffalo. At trial, the court was informed that defendant’s trial attorney had previously represented Glenn on criminal charges arising out of possession of this same contraband. Despite being made aware of this fact, from which *969an apparent conflict of interest could be inferred, the court failed to conduct an inquiry to ascertain whether defendant was aware of the potential risks involved in the apparent conflict and whether he had knowingly chosen that course (see, People v Maceróla, 47 NY2d 257, 263; People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307, 313-314). The court’s failure to make inquiry and obtain the informed consent of defendant denied defendant his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel (People v McDonald, 68 NY2d 1, 8; People v Mattison, 67 NY2d 462, 468-469). Accordingly, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and a new trial granted.
In view of our decision, we do not reach the other issues raised on appeal. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — criminal possession of controlled substance, first degree; conspiracy, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.