Court Opinion

ID: 9660637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:17:29.652072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:21.053494
License: Public Domain

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice, concurring. I concur, but would decide this habeas corpus case on the basis of waiver as discussed in United States v. Broce,_U.S._, 109 S.Ct. 757 (1989). In that case the Supreme Court held that a defendant must raise a double jeopardy argument at the time of the alleged second conviction or else the issue is waived and, therefore, cannot be raised in a subsequent habeas corpus proceeding. I would overrule any of our cases with dictum to the contrary. Purtle, J., joins in this concurrence.