Court Opinion

ID: 34757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:19:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:58.433009
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                       _______________________

                             No. 96-40548
                           Summary Calendar
                       _______________________

REGINALD R. GOSS,

                                                 Petitioner-Appellant,

                                versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION;
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS,

                                               Respondents-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                           (C-95-CV-556)
_________________________________________________________________

                          February 24, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

          Reginald R. Goss, Texas prisoner #684326, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for

failure to exhaust his state remedies.        Goss is now required to

obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) in order to appeal the

district court’s order.    We will not issue a COA, however, as Goss

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

    *
       Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
constitutional   right.     See    28       U.S.C.   §     2253(c)(2);     see   also

Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 756 (5th Cir. 1996).                       In the

alternative, if the district court was authorized to issue COA, we

conclude that because the state record indicates that Goss failed

to present his claim that the prosecution withheld exculpatory

evidence to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district court

did not err in dismissing Goss’ § 2254 petition for failure to

exhaust his state remedies.        See Dispensa v. Lynaugh.                847 F.2d
211, 217-18 (5th Cir. 1988).

          For    the   foregoing   reasons,          COA    is   DENIED;   and   the

judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                        2