Court Opinion

ID: 6660045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:01:05.600423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:00:07.572174
License: Public Domain

Letton, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for |74.30 in an action on a saloon-keeper’s bond. He moved the district court for a judgment for his costs. This motion was overruled, and it was ordered that each party pay his own costs. Prom this order plaintiff appeals.
The only point we think involved was settled in Rosenbaum v. Dunston, 16 Neb. 111. We are content to adhere to the rule announced therein.
The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Rose, J., not sitting.