Court Opinion

ID: 7171387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:26:48.896752+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:44.461392
License: Public Domain

On Application for Rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
As appears from the opinion, it was the intention of the court to give judgment in favor of plaintiff for nine months’ salary, at $150 per month, plus $55, balance due for salary for the month of March, 1915. By error of calculation, patent on the face of the opinion, the amount awarded was $1,305. It should have been $1,405.
It is therefore ordered that the decree as handed down be amended, by substituting $1,405 in place of $1,305, and otherwise affirmed.
Defendant’s application for rehearing is refused.