Court Opinion

ID: 9378900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-13 22:04:40.791926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.116410
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

             COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA                                                               NO.    2022 KW       1337

VERSUS

NATE WALKER                                                                      MARCH       13,      2023

In Re:         Nate      Walker,           applying         for    1

                                                                        supervisory         writs,        23rd
                                                                    I

               Judicial          District         Court,          Parish         of    Ascension,          No.
               22852.

BEFORE:        THERIOT,        CHUTZ,      AND    HESTER,         JJ.

       WRIT    DENIED       ON   THE       SHOWING      MADE.      Relator        failed       to    include
a     file-stamped          copy      of        the     application             for     postconviction
relief,      the   district        court's        ruling       th~reon,          the    order       granting
an     evidentiary            hearing,           the        Staters         response,           bill         of
information,          pertinent           district          court : minutes,           and     any        other
portions      of   the      district        court's         record        that    might      support        the
claims       raised    in      the    writ       application.             Therefore,           this       court
cannot        adequately           review             the     ruling         at        issue         herein.
Supplementation          of      this      writ       application          and/ or     an    application
for    rehearing       will      not       be    considered.               See    Uniform        Rules       of
Louisiana       Courts      of    Appeal,         Rules      2-18. 7 &       4-9.         In    the       event
relator elects to            file     a    new    application with this                  court,       he may
do    so    without      the     necessity            of    obtairning       a    return        date.      Any
future       filing    on    this     issue       should       inc~ude       the       entire       contents
of    this    application,           the    missing         items       noted     above,       and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                      MRT
                                                      WRC
                                                      CHH

COURT      OF APPEAL,       FIRST CIRCUIT

        DEPUTY     CLERK OF COURT
               FOR THE       COURT