Court Opinion

ID: 9377047
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-06 19:00:38.982834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:11.613501
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40504         Document: 00516666170             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                      ____________                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                      FILED
                                       No. 22-40504                               March 6, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                     Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jefferson Riascos-Aspirlla,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:22-CR-212-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jefferson
   Riascos-Aspirlla has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Riascos-Aspirlla has not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40504      Document: 00516666170            Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/06/2023

                                      No. 22-40504

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review.
          Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is ex-
   cused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                              2