Court Opinion

ID: 8448057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:43:57.446738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.818643
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Theodore Howze, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howze, No. 3:98-cr-00299-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.