Court Opinion

ID: 7156372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:09:52.68344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:15.038588
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Hargis:
The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of wilful and malicious cutting and wounding with intent to kill, and sentenced to the penitentiary for the period of one year. From this sentence he appealed.
The serious error committed against his substantial rights was in giving the first instruction, by which the jury were told if the appellant wilfully and maliciously cut and wounded James A. Wathen with a knife, etc., they should find him guilty,-etc. The acts set forth in the instruction did not constitute the statutory offense with which appellant was charged. It is a felony under our statute (Gen. Stat. [1881] Ch. 29, Art. 6, Sec. 2) to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab another with intent to kill, but it is not a felony to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab without such intent where death does not ensue; hence the instruction ought to- have contained the additional words “with intent to kill” or their equivalent. The jury were authorized to find appellant guilty of a felony on facts which constituted a misdemeanor only, and which did not constitute the offense for which he was indicted.
For these- reasons the instruction was erroneous and the judgment is reversed and cause remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial.