Court Opinion

ID: 8676709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:33:44.623307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.452004
License: Public Domain

*255Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William T. Watts, II, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watts v. Unknown Officer, No. 8:14-cv-03223-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.