Court Opinion

ID: 9906367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-01 21:00:32.83169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:19.664127
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6296      Doc: 10         Filed: 11/30/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6296

        KRISTOPHER OWEN DANIELS,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        SHIRK, Unit Manager; USP HAZELTON MEDICAL; USP HAZELTON
        COMPOUND; LIEUTENANT PEREZ; LIEUTENANT BARBER; GABBY,
        Assistant Warden,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
        Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00111-GMG)

        Submitted: November 17, 2023                                Decided: November 30, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kristopher Owen Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6296         Doc: 10    Filed: 11/30/2023    Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Kristopher Owen Daniels appeals the district court’s order accepting the

        recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Daniels’ complaint filed pursuant

        to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

        We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

        district court’s order. Daniels v. Shirk, No. 3:22-cv-00111-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 16,

        2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                                  2