Court Opinion

ID: 48035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:34:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:12.838693
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   February 7, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 06-10699
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NICOLAS SANCHEZ-GARCIA,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 3:04-CR-14-ALL
                       --------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Nicolas Sanchez-

Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense.    The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The motion to relieve court-appointed counsel and appoint new

counsel is DENIED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.