Court Opinion

ID: 6951840
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:32:50.871447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:06.471944
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam: This case appears to have been brought to this court upon writ of error, but whether upon the authority of the party whose name is upon the record as the plaintiff in error, does not appear. There is no praecipe, nor is the assignment of errors signed by counsel or otherwise. There is nothing to show by whom the record is brought here; and until it appears that the ostensible plaintiff is in court seeking action upon the record, we cannot entertain a motion on the part of the defendant which assumes that the plaintiff is in court. A judgment rendered in a cause in which the plaintiff in error has not brought himself within the jurisdiction of the court, could not be pleaded in bar to another writ of error, and it would be manifestly improper to permit any action which would be ineffectual in determining the rights of the parties. The defendant, however; may take a rule upon the plaintiff to bring himself under the jurisdiction of the court, and if the rule be not complied with the cause will be stricken from the docket. The counsel for the deféndant thereupon asked that such a rule be entered. ■ _ • Per Cübiam : A rule will be entered requiring the plaintiff in error to sign the assignment of errors; but notice of the rule must be given him.