Court Opinion

ID: 9387336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-17 18:00:26.165028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:12.967708
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40356         Document: 00516713545             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                                    FILED
                                                                                  April 17, 2023
                                       No. 22-40356
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar
                                                                                      Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Anselmo Picazo-Sanchez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:21-CR-1048-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anselmo Picazo-
   Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Picazo-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40356    Document: 00516713545          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/17/2023

                                  No. 22-40356

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                           2