Court Opinion

ID: 2682465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-10 14:00:33.785381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:08.811694
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-15098   Date Filed: 07/10/2014   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-15098
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

MICHAEL D. NEELY,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (July 10, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-15098     Date Filed: 07/10/2014   Page: 2 of 2

      Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael D. Neely in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Neely’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                          2