Court Opinion

ID: 3119322
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 08:20:23.368658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:45:18.508700
License: Public Domain

Order issued February 26, 2013

                                    In The

                             Court of Appeals
                                   For The

                        First District of Texas
                          ————————————
                            NO. 01-10-00519-CV
                          ———————————
    OKON EYO ONYUNG, M.D., THE LAW OFFICES OF YUEN &
  ASSOCIATES, P.C., THE LAW OFFICES OF YUEN & ASSOCIATES,
              PLLC, AND XENOS YUEN, Appellants
                                      V.
   COMFORT NKASI ONYUNG, CHRISTINE ENEBONG ONYUNG,
  NNAEMEKA ODUNZE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE
   ONYUNG LIVING TRUST, ODUNZE & LAZ, L.L.P., AND VICTOR
                   IHEZUKWU, Appellees

                  On Appeal from the 434th District Court
                         Fort Bend County, Texas
                    Trial Court Case No. 04-CV-140141

                ORDER ON CONTINUING ABATEMENT

     On January 31, 2013, this court issued an opinion and judgment in this case.
On February 21, 2013, appellant Xenos Yuen informed the court that he had filed a

bankruptcy petition under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on

January 21, 2013, ten days before the issuance of the court’s opinion.*

      Section 362(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code provides that once a

petition in bankruptcy is filed, it operates as an automatic stay against the

commencement or continuation of any judicial, administrative, or other proceeding

against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. §362(a). Any actions taken in violation of the

automatic stay, including judgments or other court actions, are void. Kalb v.

Feuerstein, 308 U.S. 433, 440, 60 S. Ct. 343, 346–47 (1940); York v. State, 373
S.W.3d 32, 40 (Tex. 2012). Because an appeal is a continuation of judicial action,

it is automatically stayed if it is “against the debtor.”       11 U.S.C. § 362(a).

Generally, if the debtor was the plaintiff in the court below, the stay does not

apply; however, if the debtor was the defendant, as was the case here, any further

action is stayed. See Marcus, Stowell & Beye Gov’t Sec., Inc. v. Jefferson Inv.

Corp., 797 F.2d 227, 230 n.4 (5th Cir. 1986).

      Rule 8.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that any party

may file a notice that a party is in bankruptcy. Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure provides:

      A bankruptcy suspends the appeal and all periods in these rules from

*
      Yuen filed a bankruptcy petition United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
      District of Texas, case no. 13-30249.
                                          2
      the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court
      reinstates or severs the appeal in accordance with federal law. A
      period that began to run and had not expired at the time the
      proceeding was suspended begins anew when the proceeding is
      reinstated or severed under 8.3. A document filed by a party while the
      proceeding is suspended will be deemed filed on the same day, but
      after, the court reinstates or severs the appeal and will not be
      considered ineffective because it was filed while the proceeding was
      suspended.

TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides

that “a party may move the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by

federal law or the bankruptcy court.” It also provides that “[a] party may move to

sever the appeal with respect to the bankrupt party and to reinstate the appeal with

respect to the other parties.” TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.

      By virtue of Rule 8.2, the Court abates the entire appeal. We also withdraw

our opinion and judgment of January 31, 2013. This order does not preclude

reissuance of the same opinion and judgment once the bankruptcy stay is lifted.

See Howell v. Thompson, 839 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. 1992) (order).

      The parties are ordered to notify this court when the bankruptcy stay is

lifted, by termination of the bankruptcy or otherwise. The court will not rule on

any pending motions until the bankruptcy stay is lifted.

      It is so ORDERED.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

                                           3