Court Opinion

ID: 1008100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:27.675603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:56.524770
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6438

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM GERARD PARSONS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.   Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CR-97-819, CA-00-2988-2-23)

Submitted:   July 17, 2002                 Decided:   July 25, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Gerard Parsons, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William Gerard Parsons seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Parsons, Nos. CR-97-819; CA-

00-2988-2-23 (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2