Court Opinion

ID: 4349998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-13 11:45:30.31831+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:13.117475
License: Public Domain

GRANT; and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018.

                                             In The
                                Court of Appeals
                         Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      No. 05-18-00937-CV

                          IN RE JOSEPH STROFFOLINO, Relator

                 Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court
                                   Collin County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. 219-00125-2018

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION
                         Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright
                                 Opinion by Justice Boatright
       The underlying litigation involves a contract dispute between two healthcare companies,

THM and HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc. (“HealthSpring”). Relator Joseph

Stroffolino is a corporate officer of THM. On August 13, 2018, Stroffolino was arrested pursuant

to a March 23, 2018 Capias in which the trial court found Stroffolino in contempt for failing to

comply with a prior temporary restraining order and prior injunction ordering production of certain

documents and for failure to appear at the show cause hearing. In this original proceeding, relator

seeks a writ of habeas corpus ordering he be released from custody and dissolving the Capias.

Relator maintains in part that he has been denied due process because the trial court ordered

incarceration in absentia. By order dated August 17, 2018, we ordered relator released from

custody under the “Capias” dated March 23, 2018 upon relator posting a $500 bond, and we

requested a response to the petition. After reviewing the petition, HealthSpring’s response, and

the mandamus record, we conclude relator is entitled to the relief requested.
        The underlying dispute went to arbitration and resulted in an order from the arbitration

tribunal ordering THM to produce certain electronic health assessment forms known as 360 Forms.

HealthSpring sought to enforce the tribunal’s order by filing an application for temporary

restraining order and for temporary injunction in the 219th district court of Collin County. The

trial court issued an ex parte temporary restraining order on January 12, 2018 compelling THM to

turn over the 360 Forms. Five days later, HealthSpring filed a motion to show cause and sought

monetary sanctions against THM for failing to produce the 360 Forms as ordered in the temporary

restraining order. THM filed a response to the application for temporary restraining order and for

injunction and challenged the validity of the arbitration tribunal’s order. The trial court granted

the temporary injunction after the January 26, 2018 hearing on the application.

        The show cause hearing was held on January 29, 2018 and then recessed to March 23,

2018. In the order recessing the hearing, the trial court ordered a THM corporate representative

to attend the March 23, 2018 hearing and show cause for why THM should not be held in contempt

for failing to comply with the court’s orders. No THM officers appeared at the March 23, 2018

show cause hearing. The trial court found Stroffolino in contempt for failing to appear at the

hearing and for failing to comply with the prior orders. The trial court signed and issued a “Capias”

on March 23, 2018 directing Collin County Sheriff Jim Skinner to take Stroffolino into custody

until he or any THM representative complies with the court’s order “to the satisfaction of the

plaintiff in this matter.”

        Thereafter, THM challenged the arbitration tribunal’s order in federal district court.

THM’s challenge was ultimately remanded back to the 219th district court in Collin County on

June 25, 2018. An officer from the Collin County Sheriff’s Office arrested Stroffolino at his home

on August 13, 2018 pursuant to the March 23, 2018 Capias.

                                                –2–
        In Ex Parte Alloju, the Texas Supreme Court held that a “court should not try charges of

criminal, constructive contempt in the alleged contemnor’s absence, but should instead issue a

capias or writ of attachment to bring the alleged contemnor before the court.” 907 S.W.2d 486,

487 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding). The Court explained that constructive contempt is a violation

of a court order outside the presence of the court, including failure to appear for a hearing. Id. at

487. The Court granted a petition for writ of habeas corpus, reasoning that, when a party is accused

of contempt for failure to attend a hearing and is at risk for coercive incarceration, a trial court

should not proceed on the contempt charges in the contemnor’s absence without a waiver of his

right to be present. Id.

        Accordingly, we grant the writ of habeas corpus and vacate the March 23, 2018 “Capias”

issued by the 219th Judicial District Court of Collin County, Texas in cause number 219-00125-

2018, styled HealthSpring Life & Health Insurance Company, Inc. v. Texas Health Management

LLC. We order that relator Joseph Stroffolino be unconditionally released and discharged from

the custody of the Sheriff of Collin County, Texas under the March 23, 2018 “Capias” and we

vacate the March 23, 2018 “Capias” instanter. We further discharge any bond paid by relator in

accordance with this Court’s August 17, 2018 order.

                                                   /Jason Boatright/
                                                   JASON BOATRIGHT
                                                   JUSTICE

180937F.P05

                                                –3–