Court Opinion

ID: 4421609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-31 18:50:16.491213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:48.698933
License: Public Domain

People v Baker (2019 NY Slip Op 05990)

People v Baker

2019 NY Slip Op 05990

Decided on July 31, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 31, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2017-03659

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJames Baker, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 230/16)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Charity L. Brady of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Roni Piplani of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorothy Chin-Brandt, J., at plea; Stephanie Zaro, J., at sentence), imposed March 7, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid.  It is not evident on the face of the  record that the defendant understood the nature of the right to appeal and that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; People v Ayala, 164 AD3d 815).
However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court