Court Opinion

ID: 8437914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:26:11.585507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.608247
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius R. Woods seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying without prejudice Woods’ motion for appointment of counsel in this Bivens* action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and *236certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Woods seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).