Court Opinion

ID: 993568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:09:31.499225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:54.917484
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7070

DANIEL EDWARD TATE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

CALVIN WEAVER,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-96-883)

Submitted:   October 23, 1997          Decided:     November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Edward Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tate
v. Weaver, No. CA-96-883 (E.D. Va. June 3, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2