Court Opinion

ID: 1001797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:00:53.629847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:51.793032
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6045

HENRY LOTSON SPENCE, SR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-807)

Submitted:   May 25, 2000                     Decided:   June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order

conditionally filing his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.    This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).      The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

     We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory and deny Spence’s

motion to appoint counsel.   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2