Court Opinion

ID: 2809008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-06-17 00:01:22.357483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:40.557849
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-20708      Document: 00513079121         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/16/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 14-20708
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            June 16, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OLIVERIO VALENCIA-GARCIA, also known as Oliverio Garcia Valencia, also
known as Oliverio Garza Valencia, also known as Oliverio Valencia Garcia,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:14-CR-203-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oliverio Valencia-Garcia
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-
Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013), which rejected the argument that the
Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic,
contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-20708    Document: 00513079121     Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/16/2015

                                 No. 14-20708

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person
with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly,
the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.

                                       2