Court Opinion

ID: 6789977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 01:09:17.375558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:01.941259
License: Public Domain

Pfeifer, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 6} I continue to believe that a dual filing requirement such as that contained in R.C. 5717.04 should not be part of our rules. See Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 4-5 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). I believe this case should be heard on the merits. I dissent and would deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.