Court Opinion

ID: 9929738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-03 21:00:53.641187+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:46:32.707475
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1352      Doc: 18         Filed: 02/02/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1352

        MINDY HILL,

                            Petitioner,

                     v.

        FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF
        AMERICA,

                            Respondents.

        On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission.

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                       Decided: February 2, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Mindy Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. Pamela Louise Smith, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
        COMMISSION, Washington, D.C.; Robert B. Nicholson, UNITED STATES
        DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1352      Doc: 18         Filed: 02/02/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               On April 3, 2023, Mindy Hill filed a petition for review of the Federal

        Communications Commission’s (FCC) January 9, 2017, email closing her informal

        complaint. To the extent this is an order subject to review in this court, the request for

        review was untimely filed over six years after the filing deadline. See 28 U.S.C. § 2344

        (stating petition for judicial review of FCC order must be filed within 60 days); see also

        Cellular Telecomm’n v. FCC, 330 F.3d 502, 508 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (finding 60-day statutory

        deadline jurisdictional). As such, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                       DISMISSED

                                                     2