Court Opinion

ID: 7478087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:51:33.077681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:56.571438
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This is an election contest instituted under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420. That statute provides that when an appeal is taken in such a case the appellate court will decide the issue within 24 hours after submission. LSA-R.S. 18:420E.
After considering the facts, the law and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that there is rio error in the judgment rendered by the trial court.
In view of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420E, we have decided to render judgment at this time affirming the judgment appealed from. Reasons for that judgment will be assigned at a later date.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to defendant, Conrad Fuselier.
*392HOOD, Judge.
For the reasons which we are assigning today in Roger Dale McGee v. Conrad Fuselier et al., 330 So.2d 383 (No. 5506 on our docket), we hereby confirm the judgment which we rendered in the instant suit on April 7, 1976. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant, Conrad Fuselier.
AFFIRMED.
DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs m the decree.
WATSON, J., concurs in the result.