Court Opinion

ID: 8463777
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:06:49.145962+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:11.731182
License: Public Domain

*734MEMORANDUM *
Upon de novo review, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the alternative ground that Thomas named the wrong parties. San Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2004). Defendants did not have the authority to make the accommodations requested by Thomas. See 15 Cal.Code Regs. § 3211.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.