Court Opinion

ID: 5108874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 10:30:47.549882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:23.973671
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Wingo (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-six years’ imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the remaining claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

. Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references are to RSMo 2000.