Court Opinion

ID: 9554193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-08 00:00:28.742487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:18.918541
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11046         Document: 00516848944             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/07/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11046
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                 August 7, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Rudolfo Camacho,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-150-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Defendant-
   Appellee Rudolfo Camacho has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Camacho has not filed a
   response. We reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-11046     Document: 00516848944          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/07/2023

                                   No. 22-11046

   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.
         There is, however, a clerical error in the judgment. Camacho pleaded
   guilty to possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in
   violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. However, the judgment states that he also
   pleaded guilty to violating 21 U.S.C. § 846, which governs inchoate offenses.
   Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of
   correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

                                            2