Court Opinion

ID: 8453824
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:43:46.711114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.030152
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. IRS, No. l:13-cv-00385TSE-TRJ (ED.Va. Mar. 26, 2013). We deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*410fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.