Court Opinion

ID: 8441112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:29:38.384386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.244075
License: Public Domain

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, *166AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jones, J.) is AFFIRMED.
Defendant-appellant Zarrar Sheikh appeals from a March 26, 2005 judgment sentencing him principally to a 46-month concurrent sentence, following his plea of guilty without a plea agreement, on three counts of mail fraud and one count of conspiring to commit securities and mail fraud. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts in this case, its relevant procedural history, and the issues on appeal.
Sheikh’s argument that a district court violates the Sixth Amendment when it calculates an advisory Guidelines sentence, as we held it is required to do in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, 112 (2d Cir.2005), with enhancements based on facts not admitted by the defendant or found by a jury is foreclosed by our precedent. See United States v. Garcia, 413 F.3d 201, 220 n. 15 (2d Cir.2005) (noting that “judicial authority to find facts relevant to sentencing by a preponderance of the evidence survives Booker” and that, under advisory Guidelines, a sentencing court may find facts relevant to sentencing without violating the Sixth Amendment); see also United States v. Vaughn, 430 F.3d 518, 525-26 (2d Cir.2005) (rejecting claim that the Due Process Clause requires that a defendant be sentenced only in accordance with facts proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).
For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.