Court Opinion

ID: 9920665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-18 23:49:05.116848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:19.763556
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bárbaro, J.), rendered January 10, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.