Court Opinion

ID: 994681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:26:18.623169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:18.782041
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-6628

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

JULIEN K. DILKS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-93-91, CA-96-545-R)

Submitted:   March 26, 1998                 Decided:   April 6, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julien K. Dilks, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Dilks, Nos. CR-93-91; CA-96-545-R (W.D. Va.
Mar. 31, 1997). We deny Appellant's motions to stay case and sup-

plement the record and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2