Court Opinion

ID: 1027955
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:32:54.632329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:34.402904
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 08-8184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff – Appellee,

             v.

ALEX BRADLEY, JR.,

                  Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.    Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:04-cr-00088-RAJ-FBS-2)

Submitted:    February 19, 2009            Decided:   February 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alex Bradley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.   Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special   Assistant  United States   Attorney,  Newport  News,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Alex Bradley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.      United States v. Bradley, No. 4:04-cr-00088-

RAJ-FBS-2   (E.D.   Va.   Sept. 15,   2008).   We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                      2