Court Opinion

ID: 2656354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-03-12 05:27:16.900337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:24.962062
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-40925      Document: 00512556835         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/11/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 13-40925
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                          March 11, 2014
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

JUAN MARTIN PENA-GOMEZ,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:13-CR-595-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Pena-Gomez

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40925    Document: 00512556835     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/11/2014

                                 No. 13-40925

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2