Court Opinion

ID: 867781
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-14 15:10:36.245367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:16.318793
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

         IN RE BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP

                ______________________

                      2012-1444
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences No.
90/008,317.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    HAL K. LITCHFORD, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Cald-
well & Berkowitz, PC, of Washington, DC, argued for
appellant. With him on the brief were SUSAN E. SHAW
MCBEE and CHESTER G. MOORE, III, of Washington, DC.

    KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria,
Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and LORE A. UNT,
Associate Solicitor.
                  ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (DYK, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 14, 2013                /s/ Jan Horbaly
   Date                       Jan Horbaly
                                  Clerk