Court Opinion

ID: 9832038
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:34:06.256959+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:41.379592
License: Public Domain

On Motidn for Rehearing.
[3] Appellant in motion for rehearing suggests that the opinion is based upon article 5621, Revised Civil Statutes, when it should be based upon article 5639a. We are of the opinion that no lien exists under either article, under the facts of this case.
This action is against the owner of the well machinery, as shown by the original opinion. The owner1 of the oil, gas, etc., wells is not a party, but, if it had been, the same construction of article 5639a applies. See McClellan v. Haley et al., 237 S. W. 627, and authorities there cited.
The motion is overruled.