Court Opinion

ID: 27124
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:04:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:36:53.828882
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                   ______________________________

                            No. 01-31130
                          Summary Calendar
                   ______________________________

BARBARA M. JACKSON,

            Plaintiff-Appellant

VERSUS

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION,

            Defendant-Appellee

         ___________________________________________________

             Appeal from the United States District Court
                 For the Middle District of Louisiana
                             (99-CV-864-D)
         ___________________________________________________
                            March 18, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Barbara M. Jackson, a current ExxonMobil employee who has

worked in an administrative/clerical role for the company since

1980, asserts racial discrimination and retaliation claims against

ExxonMobil for violations of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.   Ms.

     *
     Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

                                  1
Jackson complains of approximately 33 separate employment actions.

Her complaints can be generally categorized as claims for (i) job

erosion;   (ii)   elimination   of   overtime;   (iii)   attendance,

performance, and miscellaneous issues; and (iv) failure to transfer

or promote her to other jobs on numerous occasions.

      The district court granted summary judgment in favor of

ExxonMobil on all Jackson’s claims. Ms. Jackson appealed the

district court’s rulings.

     After considering the record excerpts and briefs, we hereby

AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its summary

judgment orders of May 16 and August 21, 2001.

     AFFIRMED.

                                 2