Court Opinion

ID: 7326461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 21:59:15.647269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:03.854781
License: Public Domain

ORDER
This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to R. 1:20-10(b), following a motion for discipline by consent of ROBERT BAUMOL of TEANECK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982;
And the District VA Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 3.2(fail-*472ure to expedite litigation or treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in litigation process), RPC 8 .4(c) (misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);
And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated RPC 1.3, RPC 3.2, RPC 8.4(c) and RPC 8.4(d); and that said conduct warrants a reprimand;
And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics violations and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;
And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with R. l:20-16(e);
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that ROBERT BAUMOL of TEANECK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.