Court Opinion

ID: 7682904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:14:04.896621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:33.112503
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s first conviction of direct criminal contempt is AFFIRMED, but his second conviction is REVERSED because the trial court failed to strictly comply with the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. See Hernandez v. State, 397 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla.1981). See also O’Neal v. State, 501 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
ERVIN, BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.