Court Opinion

ID: 3692510
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:34:23.93771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:50.742311
License: Public Domain

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} On December 10, 2003, relator filed a complaint in mandamus with the Ross County Clerk of Courts seeking to compel respondent to credit him with an additional 105 days of jail-time credit on his sentence being served at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution. Subsequently, we discovered that the respondent was a judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County. By entry of January 28, 2004, we found that venue was improper in Ross County and ordered the case transferred to Lawrence County.
 {¶ 2} On February 20, 2004, an answer and motion to dismiss was filed on behalf of the Lawrence County common pleas court. Attached to each was a copy of entry filed February 12, 2004, signed by Judge Frank J. McCown of that court, crediting relator with a total of 188 days jail-time credit, more than he sought in his complaint. Because the motion to dismiss presented matters outside the pleadings, we converted it to a motion for summary judgment, gave notice to the parties, and ordered relator to file his evidence and brief by April 6, 2004. He has not filed anything.
 {¶ 3} It appears that the relief relator sought has been granted. Mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed, State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983),6 Ohio St. 3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163, applied to a complaint seeking a writ for additional jail-time credit, State ex rel. Dozier v. Friedman
(Sept. 25, 1997), Cuyahoga App. No. 72889.
 {¶ 4} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and a writ of mandamus is DENIED. Costs are taxed to relator. SO ORDERED.
Harsha, J., concurs.
Evans, J., not participating.