Court Opinion

ID: 2962970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:04:20.625363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:01.520903
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

        December 12, 1994       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1804                                   RICHARD BARBER,                                Petitioner, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                Respondent, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                        _____________                         Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and
                                   ____________________                                Boudin, Circuit Judge.
                                        _____________                                 ____________________            Richard I. Barber on brief pro se.
            _________________            Donald  K.  Stern,  United  States  Attorney,  and Kevin  O'Regan,
            _________________                                  ______________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________

                      Per  Curiam.    The  denial of  appellant's  motion
                      ___________            pursuant  to 28 U.S.C.   2255 is affirmed for essentially the
                                             ________            reasons  contained in  the  district court's  Memorandum  and            Order dated July 12, 1994.                                           -2-