Court Opinion

ID: 9828448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:22:42.827251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:48.213698
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In our judgment we said: “Pending the suit Brooking made a deed to his wife.” That statement is erroneous. The record shows the deed from Brooking to his wife is dated December 12, 1928, and was filed for record July 23, 1929, .and recorded July 26, 1929, and that appellee’s writ' of attachment was levied upon the property on, July 2, 1929. At the time the attachment was levied the record title was in Brooking.
We are not prepared, under the pleading and evidence, to find from the record that Brooking made a parol gift of the property to Mrs. Brooking in 1914, as requested by appellant in her motion.
We think also that Mrs. Brooking was at all times a necessary party to the suit, both individually and as executrix of the estate.
We hold, as in the opinion, that no reversible error is shown in instructing the verdict.
The motion is oyerruled.