Court Opinion

ID: 1030791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:20:24.20693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:48.282481
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-7292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

SEAN FONTAE WHITLEY,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00166-H-1)

Submitted:    November 17, 2009            Decided:   November 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Fontae Whitley, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Sean Fontae Whitley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).     We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.    See United States v. Whitley, No. 5:04-

cr-00166-H-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009).     We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                  2