Court Opinion

ID: 623061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-17 18:21:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:03.220876
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-20023     Document: 00511761650         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/17/2012

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 17, 2012
                                     No. 11-20023
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL LOPEZ VILLEDA, also known as Manuel Lopez, also known as
Manuel Villeda Lopez, also known as Manuel L. Villeda, also known as Manuel
Lopez-Villeda, also known as Manuel Villeda-Lopez, also known as Villeda
M. Lopez, also known as Manuel Lopez-Villeoa,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:10-CR-554-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Lopez Villeda (Lopez) has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 11-20023   Document: 00511761650    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/17/2012

                                No. 11-20023

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2