Court Opinion

ID: 1007358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:24:31.074668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:04.592710
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-2485

JOHN NEILL,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

PAUL H. WEINSTEIN, Administrative            Judge,
Circuit Court of Montgomery County,

                                                  Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-2333-AW)

Submitted:    April 25, 2002                      Decided:   May 1, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Neill, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Melville Andrew, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     John Neill appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.      We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Neill v. Weinstein, No. CA-01-2333-AW (D. Md.

filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Nov. 15, 2001).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2