Court Opinion

ID: 8677541
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:02:55.136296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.324974
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alford, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Martin & Gass, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00595-LMB-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *341the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.