Court Opinion

ID: 4060459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 19:48:53.450407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:00.811480
License: Public Domain

5`\_7_\{§-_01,02,L)L4
' @E©EWE®UN

©MTOFCW¢NNAPPEALS

'TEXAS cnuRT UF BRIMINAL APPEALS ‘ ’ '~
ABLE ABDSTA, BLERK , rt ,'OCT 19 2015
e.u. an 12303, cAPITAL sTATIoN ~ '
AUSTIN, Tl-:)<1569 ,
Houston, TX_77251

,Respectfully submitteiy/

. _(,o / -/

%M/§:S//)M/ 5 f
Larry ores #817087 . »

Ellis unit -`_1697 FM 930
Huntsville, TX 773#3

a

C.E. Filed L.F.

EAusE No. 756276‘
51 .219.01.(02)(03)

 

IN THE TEXAS
EDURT UF ERIMINAL APPEALS

I_ARRY FLURES @RE©EHVED DHN

 

E>< F'arte ’ ‘ . ©©URTOFCR”WNM QPPEALS
_________ 4 OCT 19 2015
1771H DIsTRIl:T couRT RooM ' Ab@%@@§?@,@f?@i£¢

HARRIS EUUNTV, TEXAS
HUUSTDN, TEXAS
EAUSE ND. 756276

 

PETITIUN TU THE EUURTB UNDER
TEXAS RULE DF APPELLATE PRUCEDURE, RULE 4&.1(a),(1),(2)

TU THE HUNURABLE JUDGES DF TEXAS EDURT DF CRIMINAL APPEALS: _
EUMES NUM, LARRV FLURES, presenting his petition to the Eourts under Tex.

Rule App. Proc., Rule hh. 1 (a), (1), (2),_The Bonstitutional error. The above

 

cause number has not been presented to the r¢TEXJAS j Eourt of Appeals correctly

   

on QA(,\ S_El__ g~..`leQ.`\b bolt §§\_'ALM -,The tiling of the Mo.tion To Dismiss in Bause
No. 756276, Exhibit (A), and the l77th District Eourt, Eourt Urder, For The f

r

Eomplaint Dismissed; Return Capias; and Release BF DeFendant, Exhibit (B),
filed Dctober 09, 1997 with Harris Eounty District Blerk, in Cause No. 756276.

The District Eourt has dismissed the Eause No. 756276. Furthermore, The

 

§ourt of Appeals does not have jurisdiction on the above cause number,
§ ‘i;;@ng@xg[(©§);_s back to the trial court.

The Urder shall be made For the district trial courts to tollow the original
Urder by 1B U.S.E.S. 3731.

    

and shall Reverse this‘&$@§

 

 

PRAVER

where Premises Eonsidered, Larry Flores, EX Parte, respectfully request
the \‘>T€)Qp,§ Court of F\ppeals, reverses the appeal back to the district ‘
trial court, and order relief on the Eause No. 756276. The Dismissal has been

Granted, and Court Urder has been Made To-Release Larry Flores from custody.

EERTIFICATE UF SERVIEE

I, Larry Flores; do hereby&certify that a true and correct copy of the
above and Foregoing Petition To The Eourts under Texas Rule of Appellate
procedure, Rule Ah.1 (1), has on {S§R _day oF ()tzkjgiy ,2015 has been served
upon the Following individual by depostiting same in a receptance of the
United States Postal Service, properly wrapped;jpestage and addressed as
Following: Elerk, Able Acosta, Texas Eourt of Eriminal Appeals, PjD. Box 12308,
Eapital Station, Austin, Texas 78711.

Respectfully submitted,

UM//`\£/jzp,@ lé/Y/§`

LARRY %RES #9171179
Ellis unit - 1697 FM 960
Huntsville, TX 77543

(L_L.\;~\\€c\ \_.V.

611\\1%\`1 LL\
N\®`"\ \©L\`\Q» \X\§N\\§X

 

.. min-111 1\111111111-!"|\£.1£1\|\\'\ - P’IUP l {`11` l

111

 

ol-‘FENSE; C/i./p M(/M/M_ § CAUSENO "7§@ 170 607 5)
- couNrNo:J*___

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE / 73

 

olsTRicT COURT
vs. ~oF
La}/}"Zj F/ 6)/@§ HARRis- CoUNTY, TEXAS
§ MorloN To Drless

To Tm; HoNoRA.BLE JUDGE oF sAID couRT;

NOW COMES the State ofTexas by and through her District Attorney and respectfully requests the Court to
dismiss the above entitled and numbered criminal action for the following reason.

" 'l he Dei`endant was convicted in another case or count.

In custody elsewhere

Old case .no arrest.

Missing witness.

Request of complaining witness.

Motion to suppress granted

Co- Defendant tried, this Defendant testify

lnsuf`f`¢cient evidence.

Co- Def`endant convicted insufficient evidence this Defendant.
Case re1`1led.

§ Other.

@UUUHHUDHH

EX_PLANAT|ON;

CT_./_l/\)as )1/1011'€+@1 ‘ 1 » § -'

RECORDER’S NiENiORANDUM.
This instrument is 01 poor quality

/

SE
Ch” R'!cu_$m?¢?£§ls _ Respectfu|ly submitted.

ncr 0 9 1997 U?\L A//\M/\/
’l'\me: ,_\_&_\S_-§ y
"` “D°"‘y’ kde _ 1 Assistant District Attorney
By§¢____a _ ' Harris County, Tcxas
Deputy l _ .
ORDER QBT _ 9 w

The foregoing motion having been presented to me on this the ____ day of

A. D. 19 ,and the same having been considered it is therefore, ORDE,REDy ADJUDGED and_ DECREED that said
above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby dismissed

%%M%%;__f@

JUDGE

 

 

/ \ j /7 v' ‘I')>ISTRICT-COURT.

 

` HARRiS coUN'rY, TEXAS

 

 

m ¢,-`D..,,`°.,R ' -Original- Whitc:~ Scatc`s Copy - Pink: Sherif{"s Copy - Yc|low _ _ w

¢c_'
and not satisfactory for photographic
recordation; and/or alterations were '\
present at the time of fi|ming. |'\i ‘
1 O_> ‘
.Oc, .
1 _:_
§ § - ~ ' ' § ' ' ~ C) \.
VVHEREFORE PREMISES CONSlDERED, it is requested that the above entitled and numbered cause'be dis_- .~<_JH .
missed. ' ' . 1 G> .
F § L - E D cia

~»\1<1»11-»_;!.1_ __. _.

 

- ' .-'-",`\';OY,_.B.§F’?>
6>0 ...... `4~\. .
1‘1

v .'
~
a ¢'
"""""""

l, C`-htis Daniel: District Clerl; ofHan'is

`i:»,

C`.ount_\; Te:~;as certify that this is a true and
correct copy of the original record filed and or
recorded in my oftlce: electronicall_\»' or hard

cop_\~': as it appears on this date_

\\"ttness rn_\_-' oft`tcial hand and seal of office

this Se.gtetnber ZS. 3015

Certit`ied Document Number; 6445.1535.

Chris Daniel_. DISTRICT CLERK
H.=tRP.ts coU;\’TY: rims `

In accordance with Teias Go\'et'nment Cotle 406.013 electronically transmitted authenticated

documents at'e'~\'alicl. I.f there is a question regarding the validity of this document and or seal

' . ‘/_`; ' " ` 1
please e-matl suppot tg_;_hccltstiictcleil\.com

 

.~;;‘~.~',., ».<\..1. c M._.._`-.., ~..

\§1\§\ ts\_\' t is\
&Qo@v Qttcs\€,t

 

 

  

 

;~ ~- .¢nt dl\
l
:e/ mt 
whoeus, camnv
To THe SHEHIFF oF HARRIS couNtY, Tcxes= owecrtmo$.
inv woman oF two count nw twa 09 nor or ocrooen , A- n. 1?9/ twa
FoLmetNo ection 13 otRacTEn tm THE.ABUVE STYLEn ANn Nomn&wen`ceuse=
\ ' ' _