Court Opinion

ID: 2863795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:53:15.815685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:08:07.348818
License: Public Domain

<HTML> 

<HEAD> 

<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9"> 

<TITLE></TITLE> 

</HEAD> 

<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0"> 

 

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%"> 

</STRONG></P> 

<CENTER>NO. 03-0<A NAME="1">1</A>-00<A NAME="2">004</A>-CR</CENTER> 

 

 

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%"> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

 

 

<CENTER><A NAME="3">Robert Scott Paradise</A>, Appellant</CENTER> 

 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3"> 

</STRONG></P> 

<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="4">TOM GREEN</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="5">119TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER> 

</STRONG></SPAN> 

 

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="6">B-99-0393-S</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="7">BEN WOODWARD</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3"> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

 

 

Robert Scott Paradise appeals from an order revoking community supervision.  The 

underlying offense is burglary of a building.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. Penal Code Ann.  30.02 (West Supp. 2001).  

The sentence is incarceration in a state jail for one year. 

 

<P>Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is 

frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of <EM>Anders v. California</EM>, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no 

arguable grounds to be advanced.  <EM>See also</EM> <EM>Penson v. Ohio</EM>, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); <EM>High v. State</EM>, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); <EM>Currie v. State</EM>, 516  S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); 

<EM>Jackson v. State</EM>, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); <EM>Gainous v. State</EM>, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised 

of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.</P> 

 

<P>We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous 

and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.</P> 

 

<P>The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.</P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P>				__________________________________________</P> 

 

<P>				David Puryear, Justice</P> 

 

<P>Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear</P> 

 

<P>Affirmed</P> 

 

<P>Filed:   August 9, 2001</P> 

 

<P>Do Not Publish</P> 

 

</BODY> 

</HTML> 

<HTML> 

<HEAD> 

<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9"> 

<TITLE></TITLE> 

</HEAD> 

<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0"> 

 

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%"> 

</STRONG></P> 

<CENTER>NO. 03-0<A NAME="1">1</A>-00<A NAME="2">004</A>-CR</CENTER> 

 

 

<P><STRONG><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%"> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

 

 

<CENTER><A NAME="3">Robert Scott Paradise</A>, Appellant</CENTER> 

 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><CENTER>The State of Texas, Appellee</CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3"> 

</STRONG></P> 

<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="4">TOM GREEN</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="5">119TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER> 

</STRONG></SPAN> 

 

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="6">B-99-0393-S</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="7">BEN WOODWARD</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING</STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3"> 

</STRONG></P> 

 

 

 

Robert Scott Paradise appeals from an order revoking community supervision.  The 

underlying offense is burglary of a building.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. Penal Code Ann.  30.02 (West Supp. 2001).  

The sentence is incarceration in a state jail for one year. 

 

<P>Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is 

frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of <EM>Anders v. California</EM>, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no 

arguable grounds to be advanced.  <EM>See also</EM> <EM>Penson v. Ohio</EM>, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); <EM>High v. State</EM>, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); <EM>Currie v. State</EM>, 516  S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); 

<EM>Jackson v. State</EM>, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); <EM>Gainous v. State</EM>, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised 

of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.</P> 

 

<P>We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous 

and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.</P> 

 

<P>The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.</P> 

 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2"> 

<P>				__________________________________________</P> 

 

<P>				David Puryear, Justice</P> 

 

<P>Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear</P> 

 

<P>Affirmed</P> 

 

<P>Filed:   August 9, 2001</P> 

 

<P>Do Not Publish</P> 

 

</BODY> 

</HTML>