Court Opinion

ID: 4700319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-01 15:00:40.379817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:05.130920
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40545      Document: 00515920784         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/30/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                  United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                                                             June 30, 2021
                                  No. 20-40545                              Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Hugo Paz-Gonzalez,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:19-CR-29-1

   Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Hugo Paz-
   Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Paz-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40545    Document: 00515920784          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/30/2021

                                  No. 20-40545

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2