Court Opinion

ID: 1004521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:42:27.18504+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:33.391844
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6356

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL ANTONIO LUCAS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
91-308, CA-01-278-S)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                   Decided:   May 29, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Antonio Lucas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Antonio Lucas seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Lucas, Nos. CR-91-308;

CA-01-278-S (D. Md. filed Feb. 1, 2001; entered Feb. 2, 2001).

Lucas’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2