Court Opinion

ID: 9753939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 19:35:39.189298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:53.332088
License: Public Domain

*599Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen :
I cannot conclude that tbe small taking here affected tbe ingress to or egress from plaintiff’s land. On tbe contrary, tbe testimony clearly shows that tbe taking was in no way related to tbe installation of the curbing. Since there was no taking, tbe rule established in F-K Market House Co., Inc. v. Reading, 310 Pa. 493, 165 Atl. 398 (1933) applies. I would reverse and grant a new trial: Johnson’s Petition, 344 Pa. 5, 23 A. 2d 880 (1942).