Court Opinion

ID: 9834052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:15:48.368725+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:53:56.670910
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
We adhere to our original conclusion that the facts and circumstances shown do not satisfactorily warrant the holding that the association is estopped from claiming the forfeiture incurred. We think the evidence insufficient to sustain the plea of estoppel. We believe, however, that we were in error in tendering judgment for appellant, and instead the case should be reversed and remanded.
It seems within the range of possibility that appellee, plaintiff, may be able with ad-tional evidence to make out a proper case of estoppel under principles applicable in that respect. That it cannot be correctly held, from the admitted' or clearly established facts shown in the record before us on this appeal, that it is conclusive as a matter of law that plaintiff cannot recover on another trip.1.
Therefore it is ordered that the motion for rehearing filed by appellee be granted, and the judgment appealed from is now reversed, and the cause remanded.