Court Opinion

ID: 4909468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-09 00:29:55.848892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:20.477745
License: Public Domain

Opinion.— As to the immediate transaction there is a contrariety of evidence. Three persons had been pointed out to the conductor as suspicious persons by a watchman at the depot, who informed the conductor that it was thought that they were following a gentleman then on the train, with a view of robbing him. The conductor thought *307appellee was one of the three men pointed out to him as suspicious persons, and was engaged, in watching him and two others to prevent them robbing the passengers. Held, it may be assumed that the conductor was mistaken in the men pointed out and wasdaboring under a misapprehension as to appellee’s intentions and the purport of his act, yet such mistake would not excuse the company nor exempt it from liability for the actual damage resulting to appellee^ from the wrongful acts of the conductor, which would include all damages resulting as a natural consequence from the wrong, including mental and physical suffering. Two thousand dollars actual damages is held not to be excessive, and as the exemplary damages have been remitted, the judgment is reversed and here rendered for same amount.
Reversed and sendereo.