Court Opinion

ID: 9712721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:58:44.938476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:13.882300
License: Public Domain

PRESIDING JUSTICE HARRISON, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. It seems to me that the issue of appeal in this case has been decided adversely to the defendant by our supreme court in People v. Tammen (1968), 40 Ill. 2d 76, 237 N.E.2d 517. Implicit in the supreme court’s ruling in People v. Tammen is the determination that the right to request a bill of particulars affords adequate protection to the defendant. People v. Domovich (1980), 91 Ill. App. 3d 870, 414 N.E.2d 290.