Court Opinion

ID: 1014131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:11:46.810613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:35.191998
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 04-6565

DARRICK LAMONTE KING,

                                               Plaintiff -   Appellant,

          versus

JUANITA BAKER; MARY HARROP; KAREN PARDUE,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-825-5-BR)

Submitted:   August 12, 2004                 Decided:   August 18, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrick Lamonte King, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Darrick Lamonte King appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   See King v.

Baker, No. CA-01-825-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 2, 2004 & entered

Mar. 3, 2004).   We deny King’s pending motion for relief.      We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -