Court Opinion

ID: 9904311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-27 16:32:22.938253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:21.871360
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                     FIFTH DISTRICT

DALE B. GREEN,

           Appellant,

v.                                              Case No. 5D22-815
                                                LT Case No. 2008-CF-1908

STATE OF FLORIDA,

         Appellee.
________________________________/

Opinion filed July 29, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Putnam County,
Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge.

Dale B. Green, Graceville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock
McGuigan,    Assistant   Attorney
General, Daytona     Beach, for
Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

     Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,

repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and

sentence in Putnam County Circuit Court Case Number 2008-CF-1908, this
Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not

be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d

47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it

fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that

Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further

pro se filings.

      In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from

filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Putnam County

Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-1908. The Clerk of this Court is directed

not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The

Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case

unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v.

State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The

Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the

appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See §

944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019).

      APPELLANT PROHIBITED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.

                                     2