Court Opinion

ID: 7545328
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:33:29.355605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:55.494746
License: Public Domain

McDONALD, Justice,
concurring.
Believing that our holding in Raisen v. Raisen, 379 So.2d 352 (Fla.1979), should be modified to allow one spouse to maintain an action against the other to the extent of available liability insurance coverage, I dissented in Snowten v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., no. 64171 (Fla. Aug. 29, 1985). However, Snowten obtained the majority approval of the Court and I therefore feel obliged to follow it in this case where the issue is identical.