Court Opinion

ID: 2950423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:42:45.819774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:00.111663
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,364-01

                   EX PARTE DENEAL MARK SHAWN BOBO, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 54266-A IN THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM WICHITA COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance and was sentenced to twenty-four months’ state jail imprisonment. He did not

appeal his conviction.

        Applicant contends that he was denied due process, that his plea was not knowingly and

voluntarily entered, that the trial court abused its discretion by entering the plea without Applicant’s

consent, and that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
                                                                                                      2

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial

counsel shall state whether he performed an independent investigation of the facts, advised Applicant

of his options with respect to trial or a plea, and advised Applicant of the nature and consequences

of the plea.    Trial counsel shall state whether Applicant asked him to withdraw from the

representation at any time before the entry of the plea. The trial court may use any means set out in

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall first supplement the habeas record with copies of the plea documents,

including any written plea agreement, written admonishments, waivers and stipulations. The trial

court shall also supplement the habeas record with transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of

Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced

Applicant. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant expressed a desire to dismiss

trial counsel, and if so, whether the trial court addressed Applicant’s concerns. The trial court shall

make findings of fact as to whether Applicant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea

agreement. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it
                                                                                                      3

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 17, 2014
Do not publish