Court Opinion

ID: 4105712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-08 17:08:46.355846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:59.897223
License: Public Domain

People v Haywood (2016 NY Slip Op 08303)

People v Haywood

2016 NY Slip Op 08303

Decided on December 8, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 8, 2016

Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Andrias, Moskowitz, JJ.

2426 1050/91

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vKelvin Haywood, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Distrit Attorney, New York (Kelly L. Smith of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered March 31, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Even assuming that defendant's correct point score is 95 rather than 105, he remains a level two offender, and we find no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying offense.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 8, 2016
CLERK