Court Opinion

ID: 4644799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-18 22:01:46.473373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:47.877495
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 19-1110V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

    VICTORIA EDENS,                                         Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                         Filed: November 17, 2020
    v.
                                                            Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                            Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                       Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)

David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.

Amanda Pasciuto, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                   RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

       On July 30, 2019, Victoria Edens filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury caused in fact
by the influenza vaccine she received on November 1, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 3, 18.
Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine in the United States, that she
suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that neither she
nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her injury, alleged
as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 3, 18-19. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2
  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
        On November 17, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c)
Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is
consistent with a SIRVA injury, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 3.
Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now stands, [P]etitioner has
satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                  s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Chief Special Master

                                           2