Court Opinion

ID: 1004269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:45.133203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:40.861916
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TRACY EDGAR KNOX,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CR-98-13, CA-00-115)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                    Decided:   May 3, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy Edgar Knox, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tracy Edgar Knox seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Knox, Nos. CR-98-13; CA-

00-115 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2000).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2