Court Opinion

ID: 3673144
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:20:51.462896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:44.469494
License: Public Domain

Civil action by consignor to recover of consignee and delivering carrier $181.73 value of three interstate shipments of goods.
On 8 March, 1935, on 5 September, 1935, and again on 3 February, 1936, the plaintiff delivered to the Nashville, Chattanooga  St. Louis Railway Company at Nashville, Tenn., a shipment of goods consigned to B. D. Pridgen, Wilson, N.C. taking therefor on each occasion a uniform straight bill of lading.
There is evidence tending to show that the delivering carrier tendered the goods to the consignee, who rejected them, and the record is silent as to what became of the shipment.
This action was instituted 7 September, 1937, without any prior notice or claim of loss having been filed with the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, as required by the bills of lading.
In the court of first instance, the plaintiff was awarded judgment against the carrier and a nonsuit entered in favor of the consignee. *Page 248 
From this judgment, the carrier appealed to the Superior Court, where "a voluntary nonsuit was taken as to B. D. Pridgen," and the court sustained a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit in favor of the A. C. L. Railroad Company.
From this latter judgment, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.
As plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of notice set out in each bill of lading and designated "as a condition precedent to recovery," its action against the carrier was properly dismissed. St. Sing v. ExpressCo., 183 N.C. 405, 111 S.E. 710; Culbreth v. R. R., 169 N.C. 723,86 S.E. 624.
Affirmed.