Court Opinion

ID: 5271115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 21:23:42.587641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:14.243427
License: Public Domain

Order granted August 23, 1920, confirming report of referee, as resettled by order granted October 18, 1920, reversed on the law and facts, and matter remitted to the County Court of Erie county to name a new referee in the surplus money proceeding, with costs to the appellant. The record in this proceeding is in such condition that we are unable to determine what rights, if any, the appellant may have. The proceeding was irregular in its inception. Rule 32 of the Rules of Civil Practice was not complied with. The judgment and pleadings in the foreclosure action are not in the record. The referee appointed by the County Court occupied an office with the plaintiff’s attorney and it was improper for him to act as referee under the circumstances. On account of that fact and the condition of the record, the ends of justice require that there should be another hearing in this proceeding. The order granted September 23, 1920, denying the application to require the return of the money to the county treasurer is also reversed, and the County Court is directed to make an order requiring the return of all moneys to the county treasurer, pending the determination of the proceeding. All concur.