Court Opinion

ID: 7385258
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:15:08.408152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:31.282835
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the Court was now delivered by
Cameron, J.
In this case, the testator, Theophilus Hunter, devised as follows: “I give and bequeath to my grandchildren, by my daughter Jane, as follows, to-wit:—to my grandson Alfred Land, 350 acres of land, being the upper part of a tract of land of 700 acres purchased by me of Jas. Lane, lying on Crabtree Creek—Also, to my granddaughters Patsey Lane, and Jane Lane, I give and bequeath the lower part of the same tract of land, to be equally divided between them.”
The tract contains, by actual survey, 1100 acres of land, and the question is, whether the defendant is entitled to 350 *267acres, being the upper part of the tract, or to one half of the tract?
The meaning of the testator is always to prevail, when it can be fairly inferred from the words he has used, and when it does not contravene any known or established rule of law. It does not follow, because the testator describes the tract in question, as a tract of 700 acres, and devises to the defendant 350 acres, being the upper part of the same, that he intended to give him one half of the tract. Suppose the tract only contained 500 acres, could the Court say that the testator only intended that the defendant should have 250 acres, when he has expressly and specifically devised to him 350 acres?—We apprehend not.
It was decided in the case of Powel v. Liles, in this Court, that describing a tract of land, as containing a specific number of acres, did not vary the case from a description of a tract by so many acres, more or less. If the testator had described the tract to be 700 acres, more or less, no question could have been raised. In our opinion, the words he has used mean nothing more than if he said 700 acres, more or less. Wherefore, a majority of the Court are of opinion, that the defendant, Alfred Lane, is entitled under the will of the said Theophilus Hunter, to 350 acres of land to be taken from the upper part of the aforesaid tract, and that the petitioners are entitled to have the residue of said land divided between them equally.