Court Opinion

ID: 4216179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-31 13:01:41.84597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:28.990857
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10878   Date Filed: 10/31/2017   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 17-10878
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00348-SDM-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

HECTOR CAMIRLO ESPINOZA-GUIDO,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (October 31, 2017)

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-10878    Date Filed: 10/31/2017   Page: 2 of 2

      Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2