Court Opinion

ID: 8099974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:24:22.229478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:37.637964
License: Public Domain

*331Opinion by
Rao, J.
It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, supra; and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.