Court Opinion

ID: 6348890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-10 20:21:53.648258+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:25.809999
License: Public Domain

People v Mobley (2022 NY Slip Op 03839)

People v Mobley

2022 NY Slip Op 03839

Decided on June 10, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 10, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

464 KA 19-02336

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJAMAL D. MOBLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

KATHLEEN E. CASEY, BARKER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered October 2, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree and criminal contempt in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]) and criminal contempt in the second degree (§ 215.50 [3]). We affirm. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Alls, 187 AD3d 1515, 1515 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: June 10, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court