Court Opinion

ID: 1033760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-16 00:01:13.477793+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:29.642933
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Nathaniel Allen, confined under an order of civil commitment as a violent sex offender, sued various state officials and employees for declaratory and injunctive relief. On January 30, 2013, the district court issued a thorough and persuasive seventeen-page opinion and order dismissing all claims.
 

  The district court carefully addressed all of Allen’s assertions and explained why they have no merit. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. Allen’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.