Court Opinion

ID: 9408544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-13 00:00:51.303854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:44.529579
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10917         Document: 00516818409             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/12/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10917
                                     Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                     ____________                                     July 12, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Luis Curiel,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-132-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Luis Curiel has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Curiel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10917    Document: 00516818409         Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/12/2023

                                 No. 22-10917

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2