Court Opinion

ID: 724335
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 08:44:28+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:03.689396
License: Public Domain

92 F.3d 1182
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Clement CHAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6755.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 1996.Submitted:  July 23, 1996.Decided:  August 6, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.  (CR-87-61, CA-96-184-5)
Clement Chavis, Appellant Pro Se.  Fenita Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217.   We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Chavis, Nos.  CR-87-61;  CA-96-184-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 1996).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED