Court Opinion

ID: 9833658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:55:36.753173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:05.657431
License: Public Domain

*459ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
We overrule appellants’ motion for rehearing, but will comply with their request for additional findings of fact. We find that the regular terms of the County Court of Travis County were begun on the first Mondays in January, April, July and October, and continued until the business was disposed of; that there was not time to probate the will at the July term, 1906, but Huppertz wrote Wickes that he had plenty of time for the October term. The first Monday in July, being on the 2d day of July, 1906, the first Monday in October, 1906, was on October 1; that the County Court at the end of each term would set apart the days for probate business for the following term, and that Saturday of each week of the term was set apart for probate business; notwithstanding this setting the court frequently took up and transacted probate business on other days than Saturdays. That appellee returned to Austin from Tennessee about September 15, 1906.
Motion for rehearing overruled.

Overruled.

Writ of error refused.