Court Opinion

ID: 8481165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 19:08:12.736863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.883643
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Mark David Cloud has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cloud has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cloud’s response discloses no nonfriv-olous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Cloud’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.