Court Opinion

ID: 543287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:48.712477
License: Public Domain

905 F.2d 1529Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Elmer HARRELSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Randy E. LEE;  Attorney General of North Carolina,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6009.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 1990.Decided May 9, 1990.Rehearing Denied June 7, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.  Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-585-G)
Elmer Harrelson, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Elmer Harrelson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 on the grounds of non-exhaustion in state courts.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Harrelson v. Lee, CA-89-585-G (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.