Court Opinion

ID: 7788437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:27:43.786506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:19.786650
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s postconviction relief claim that prior to entering Ms plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh’g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that “[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences”).

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.