Court Opinion

ID: 8676574
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:28:30.047032+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.352006
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s October 3, 2014 order denying his motions to recuse and relative to his inmate trust account, dismissing three defendants, denying his motion to expedite, and requesting that the remaining defendants return waivers of service. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Roudabush seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.