Court Opinion

ID: 6782014
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:57:11.240798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:53.036852
License: Public Domain

On October 5, 2000, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for this court to issue an order requiring respondent, Ralph L. Marzocco, to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective November 28, 2000, that the motion be, and hereby is, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.