Court Opinion

ID: 5463237
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:43:08.521595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:59.478646
License: Public Domain

Per curiam,
The queftion is, as to the operation of a certificate of probable caufe to ftay proceedings. The 4th rule of January, 1799, fettles, that, at the time of fervice of the order, it muft be accompanied with a notice of motion. The right of the oppofite party to notice for argument, does not take away the neceility of notice, for the mere certificate it-
*507felf is no flay. The defendant, therefore, can take nothing
by his motion, and mv.it pay the coils of the prefent appli-
cation.