Court Opinion

ID: 1009983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:04:38.278353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:35:30.819658
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7578

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ALFRED HEATH,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Senior District
Judge. (CR-97-240-MJP, CA-00-3266)

Submitted:   February 27, 2003            Decided:   March 12, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Heath, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alfred Heath seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Heath’s

claims are meritless.   Accordingly, he has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.        We deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2