Court Opinion

ID: 9380936
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-21 18:00:41.03927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:28.520429
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40645         Document: 00516683028             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/21/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                                 March 21, 2023
                                       No. 22-40645
                                     Summary Calendar                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                     Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Carlos Leal,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 1:21-CR-12-4
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Leal has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leal
   has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
   portions of the record reflected therein.               We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40645    Document: 00516683028         Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/21/2023

                                 No. 22-40645

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2