Court Opinion

ID: 1016818
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:54:59.338986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:24.605727
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  H. Daniel Pollock appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on his action challenging his removal as the building code official for the City of Roanoke. Our review of the record and the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pollock v. City of Roanoke,
  
  No. CA-01-1018-JCT (W.D.Va. Aug. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED