Court Opinion

ID: 5094578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 16:40:04.811805+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:44.940668
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).