Court Opinion

ID: 3115927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:37:06.573253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:42:01.398516
License: Public Domain

02-11-178-CR

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-11-00178-CR
 
 

Dereck Jamison Smith

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

The State of Texas

 

STATE

 
 
----------
FROM THE 396th
District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1]
----------
          Appellant
Dereck Jamison Smith entered an open plea of guilty to burglary of a habitation
with intent to commit aggravated robbery and pleaded true to a prior felony
conviction alleged in the repeat offender notice.  The trial court sentenced
Smith to thirty years’ confinement at the conclusion of the punishment hearing.
 Smith’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  Counsel avers that in his
professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet
the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional
evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for
relief.  See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).  This court informed
Smith that he could file a pro se brief, but he did not do so.  The State did
not submit a brief.
          Once
an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the
ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders,
this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. 
See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays
v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). 
Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
          We
have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief.  We agree with counsel
that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the
record that might arguably support the appeal.  See Bledsoe v. State,
178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State,
206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).  Accordingly, we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
 
 
 
BILL MEIER
JUSTICE
 
PANEL: 
LIVINGSTON,
C.J.; MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ.
 
DO
NOT PUBLISH
Tex.
R. App. P. 47.2(b)
 
DELIVERED:  December 15, 2011

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.