Court Opinion

ID: 8517665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 08:52:50.299123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:51:22.777834
License: Public Domain

Geoghegan, J.
By consent of counsel this matter was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury.
The cause of action set forth in the petition is one to recover the sum of $790.64 on an account for gas furnished to the village of Hartwell for street illuminating purposes and the re-location of one of the iamps in said village.
The only evidence offered in support of this claim is the record of the annexation proceedings whereby the village of Hartwell *616was annexed to tbe city of Cincinnati, and in which the city of Cincinnati assumed to pay all and singular the legal and valid obligations and liabilities of said village of Hartwell. No evidence is offered of any contract between the village of Hartwell and the plaintiff for the furnishing of this service, nor any ordinance of the village of Hartwell authorizing any one to contract for these services and to pay for them. In fact, it is conceded by counsel for plaintiff that the contract for illuminating the streets of the village of Hartwell had expired prior to the rendition of these services.
Therefore, from all the evidence before the court, it is clear that the recovery sought for can not be had for the reason that a municipal corporation is not liable on a quantum, meruit for services rendered, and that in order that a recovery may be had for such services it must be shown that they were rendered under and by virtue of a contract, agreement, obligation or appropriation made and entered into according to statute. City of Wellston v. Morgan, 65 Ohio St., 219; McCormick v. City of Niles, 81 Ohio St., 246; Village of Pleasant Ridge v. Dayton Limestone Company, 17 C.C. (N.S.), 498.
Judgment will be entered for the defendant.