Court Opinion

ID: 4929664
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 01:05:40.535588+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:25.401668
License: Public Domain

Shepley, C. J.
—-The demandant claims title by the levy of an execution in favor of Daniel Beale, jr., against Nath’l D. Richardson, made on January 14,1846, and duly recorded, and by a conveyance of the same premises from Beale, jr. to himself, made on September 29,1847, and recorded October 9, 1847.
The tenant claims title by conveyances from William King to Clarissa Richardson, the wife of Nathaniel D. Richardson, made on October 13, 1842, and recorded November 1, 1842. From Clarissa Richardson to Enoch Messer, made on November 21, 1846, and recorded November 4,1850. From Enoch Messer to the tenant, made on March 24, and recorded on July 14, 1852. From Clarissa Richardson to the tenant made on March 12, and recorded on June 13, 1853.
Upon examination of a copy of the record of the levy it appears to have been made for one dollar at least more than the amount of the debt, costs, interest, fees for executions, and costs of levy. It is therefore invalid.
It is insisted, that the demandant may nevertheless recover ; that Beale acquired a seizin by his levy which he conveyed to the demandant; that no one can take advant*80age of the defect in the levy and disprove the demandant’s seizin, unless he claims under the debtor.
The tenant appears to have been in possession of the premises, when this action was commenced, under the deed from Enoch Messer duly recorded.
When a person is in possession of land, he may by a possessory action protect it against all, who do not represent a superior title.
When one is not in possession, if he would by a real action obtain possession from an occupant, he must recover upon the strength of his own title; not upon the weakness of that of the tenant. Demandant nonsuit.
Tenney, Appleton and Cutting, J. J., concurred.