Court Opinion

ID: 8672564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:22:43.924398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:21.917313
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Santiago Alcantar-Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release, and the 16-month sentence imposed.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Alcantar-Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.