Court Opinion

ID: 2926673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:35:29.886887+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:35.694157
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00064-CV

                                    COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                          CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

              IN THE INTEREST OF J. J. L., A CHILD
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
                   of Calhoun County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

                     Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
                         Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        The parties to this appeal have filed an “Agreed Motion to Vacate Trial Court

SAPCR Order on Appeal, Reverse Venue Ruling, and Render Judgment Transferring

Case.” According to the motion, the parties have mutually agreed to the relief requested.

        The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court’s opinion that the motion

should be granted in part and denied in part.1 Accordingly, without regards to the merits,

        1
         Rule 42.1(a)(2) perm its the Court to render judgm ent effectuating the parties’ agreem ents or to
vacate the trial court’s judgm ent and rem and the case to the trial court for rendition of judgm ent in accordance
with the agreem ent; we cannot do both. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B).
we vacate the trial court’s SAPCR Order entered January 29, 2009 and remand the case

to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement

agreement. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d). In accordance with the agreement

of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX . R. APP. P.

42.1(d).

                                                      PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 23rd day of July, 2009.

                                           2