Court Opinion

ID: 9885568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 13:07:21.682689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:55.108709
License: Public Domain

Dye, J.
(dissenting). I dissent and vote to modify the orders of the Appellate Division to the extent that the petitioners be directed to produce the documents called for by items numbered 2 and 3 of the subpoenas acquired from April 1, 1950 (which is the earliest date the commission claims the witnesses manifested an interest in Algam), to date, insofar as the same are relevant and material to the matter under investigation, and, as so modified, the orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed (see U. S. Const., 4th Amendt.; N. Y. Const., art. I, § 12; Executive Law, § 6).
.Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur; Dye, J., dissents in memorandum.
Orders affirmed.