Court Opinion

ID: 9738321
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:49:48.29632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:05.377221
License: Public Domain

Clinton, J.,
dissenting.
I dissent. If this case were one of first impression not controlled by valid binding precedent, I would have no hesitancy in joining in the majority opinion. However, I believe it is controlled by our opinion in Bose v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 186 Neb. 209, 181 N. W. 2d 839. Whether the uninsured motorist coverage by which two automobiles are insured is provided in one policy or in two is not significant, and that is the only *720distinction between this case and Bose v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., supra.