Court Opinion

ID: 4164475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-04-28 19:04:09.278788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:53.237771
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anderson’s motion for an order of protection or restraining order, deny his motion for a subpoena, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Anderson v. Greenville Health Sys.,
  
  No. 6:16-cv-01051-MGL, 2016 WL 6405751 (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED