Court Opinion

ID: 9415580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:01:13.025182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:26.084839
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10781    Document: 31-1     Date Filed: 08/02/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10781
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       KLONDE DELVIUM HATTER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 2:19-cr-00466-ACA-JHE-7
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10781     Document: 31-1     Date Filed: 08/02/2023   Page: 2 of 3

       2                     Opinion of the Court                22-10781

                           ____________________

                                 No. 22-10784
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                           ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                       Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       KLONDE DELVIUM HATTER,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00131-ACA-JHE-2
                          ____________________

       Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for Klonde Hatter,
       in these consolidated direct criminal appeals, has moved to with-
       draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
USCA11 Case: 22-10781     Document: 31-1     Date Filed: 08/02/2023    Page: 3 of 3

       22-10781              Opinion of the Court                        3

       pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ-
       ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
       the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent
       examinations of both of the entire records reveal no arguable issues
       of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hat-
       ter’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.