Court Opinion

ID: 9839867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-14 16:07:17.987185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:03.367379
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                     IN THE OFFICE OF THE
                                                                  CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
                                                                      SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
                                                                   STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                 IN THE SUPREME COURT
                 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                               2023 ND 167

Sergio Ruiz Ledezma,                               Petitioner and Appellant
     v.
State of North Dakota,                             Respondent and Appellee

                               No. 20230055

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District,
the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Amanda R. Engelstad, State’s Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and
appellee; submitted on brief.
                           Ruiz Ledezma v. State
                               No. 20230055

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Sergio Ruiz Ledezma appeals from a district court order denying his
application for post-conviction relief.

[¶2] On appeal, Ruiz Ledezma argues the district court abused its discretion
in denying his oral motions for continuance made at the post-conviction relief
hearing. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Ruiz Ledezma’s motions for continuance. We summarily affirm under
N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
     Daniel J. Crothers
     Lisa Fair McEvers
     Jerod E. Tufte
     Douglas A. Bahr

                                      1