Court Opinion

ID: 46917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:08:11+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:08.099597
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                           Fifth Circuit

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                        F I L E D
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT           December 6, 2006

                                                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                            Clerk
                            No. 06-50469
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR MANUEL VAZQUEZ-MENDOZA,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 2:05-CR-702-ALL
                       --------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Manuel

Vazquez-Mendoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense.   The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.