Court Opinion

ID: 6541101
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:15:44.610536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:50.085976
License: Public Domain

English, C. J. At the November term, 1880, of the Circuit Court of Franklin county, S. S. Bridges was indicted for selling liquor to a minor. A capias was issued to the •sheriff of Johnson county, who arrested defendant and delivered him into the custody of the sheriff of Franklin, and he released him on his executing a bail bond with sureties, for his appearance at the next term thereafter. At the appearance term, the case was called for trial, and the defendant failed to appear. His attorneys asked to be allowed to enter a plea of not guilty for him, and that he be tried in his absence. This the court declined to permit, and directed the fact of his failure to appear to be entered on the minutes; ordered an alias capias for defendant, and a •summons upon the forfeiture to his sureties in the bail-bond returnable to the next term. From this order and before any final judgment in the case, or upon the forfeiture, defendant’s attorneys prayed in'his name, and there was granted an appeal to this court. Where the indictment is for a misdemeanor, the Statute provides that the trial may be had in the absence of the •defendant. (Gantt’s Dig., sec. 1888,) and it was said in Griffin v. The State, 37 Ark., 442, that no doubt the court had the discretion to permit the trial in his absence, but as a practice it was not to be commended. The court below, in the exercise of its discretion, declined to permit appellant to be tried in his absence, and in matters of discretion, there is no review on appeal except in cases •of abuse. There was, however, no final judgment from which an appeal would lie, and the appeal must be dismissed at appellant’s costs.