Court Opinion

ID: 52139
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:12:34+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:12.771939
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit
                                                                       F I L E D
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             August 8, 2007
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                   Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                           Clerk
                                 No. 07-40140
                              Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUSEBIO RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA

                                            Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 1:06-CR-930-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eusebio Rodriguez-Mendoza
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.