Court Opinion

ID: 9764562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 03:27:17.074713+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:58.222767
License: Public Domain

BECK, Judge,
concurring:
I join in Judge Hoffman’s Opinion which completely addresses the issues raised in this case. I also note that I still conclude the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not renounced the three-pronged jurisdictional analysis enunciated in Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co., 228 Pa.Super. 12, 19, 323 A.2d 11, 15 (1974). See Eastern Continuous Forms v. Island Business Forms, 355 Pa.Super. 352, 513 A.2d 466 (1986) (Beck, J., concurring).