Court Opinion

ID: 9857113
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 07:16:14.093902+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:01.925159
License: Public Domain

WARREN, J.,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I agree with Judge De Muniz that the field sobriety test need not be suppressed. I agree, however, with Judge Riggs that the trial court did not err in failing to suppress the results of the breath test, because defendant never requested to talk with his attorney. The request was to have his attorney present and, as the lead opinion concedes, he was not entitled to have that request honored.
We review for error. I would hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress the field sobriety test and the breath test. I would affirm.