Court Opinion

ID: 8452127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:54:22.775463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.583922
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Korell Battle appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. Eagleton, No. 8:07-cv-01841-GRA 2008 WL 2952349 (D.S.C. July 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.