Court Opinion

ID: 990850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:27:52.351062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:45.847944
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6639

GRANVILLE VENEY,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden of the Maryland House
of Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF MARYLAND,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CA-95-369-HAR)

Submitted:   November 7, 1996          Decided:     November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Granville Veney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor-
ney General, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Anti-
terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Veney v. Smith, No. CA-95-369-HAR
(D. Md. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2