Court Opinion

ID: 1006844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:17:05.921942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:45.324228
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7998

GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SERGEANT LOVE; E. S. WILLIS; COUNSELOR
PARMELEE,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-385-3)

Submitted:   February 21, 2002             Decided:   March 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re-

versible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Richardson v. Love, No. CA-01-385-3 (E.D. Va.

Nov. 6, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2