Court Opinion

ID: 7951896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:27:44.945885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:11.036958
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
On rehearing our attention is particularly called to the fact that in the decree rendered in the circuit court and affirmed by this court (218 Mich. 106), the defendant was not allowed interest after December 27, 1918, on the amount ($4,150) at that time found to be due on its mortgage. Counsel for the defendant called attention to. this error in *664the brief filed on the original hearing, but in some way it was overlooked in our affirmance of the decree.
The mortgage in question was dated March 7, 1916, payable three years after date with interest at the rate of 7% per annum payable on December 15th of each year. On December 20, 1918, plaintiffs tendered to the president of the insurance company then holding the mortgage, and also to defendant’s cashier, the sum of $4,444.54 in full payment and discharge of the mortgage. These tenders were sufficient in amount had the principal sum then been due. On December 27, 1918, a tender was made to defendant’s cashier of $306.93 in full payment of the interest due on December 15, 1918. This tender was sufficient and should have been accepted. Interest on the amount thereof will not thereafter be allowed, but the tender of the amount of the principal of the mortgage before it became due would not affect the right of the defendant to thereafter collect interest thereon. Plaintiffs’ counsel so concede as a matter of contract right but say:
“The only reason that defendant is deprived of interest is because of its wrongful conduct after such tender was made.”
The fact that defendant, claiming there was a default in the payment of interest in that the tender thereof was insufficient, afterwards declared the principal sum also due and began foreclosure proceedings would not affect its right to collect the interest provided for in the note secured by the mortgage until it should be paid or a legal tender thereof made. Anderson v. Smith, 108 Mich. 69.
The decree will be modified to provide for payment by plaintiffs to defendant of interest due on December 27, 1918, $306.93; principal $4,150 and interest thereon from December 27, 1918, to date of payment. As the modification is substantial, appellant will recover costs of this appeal.