Court Opinion

ID: 551391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.835038
License: Public Domain

918 F.2d 955Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Restoney ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James G. MARTIN, Governor, Judi Campbell, R. M. Jarvis,Jacob L. Safron, Robert Davis, Lacy Tyson, J.C.Pinion, Craig Hillard, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-7357.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.Decided Nov. 21, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury.  Richard C. Erwin, Chief District Judge.  (CA-88-1013-S)
Restoney Robinson, appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Restoney Robinson seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Robinson v. Martin, CA-88-1013-S (M.D.N.C. July 25, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.