Court Opinion

ID: 4453812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-07 16:00:55.920387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:52.825843
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10284   Date Filed: 11/07/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-10284
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00004-LGW-BKE-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

HOSEA G. SHERROD,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                            (November 7, 2019)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, BRANCH and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-10284    Date Filed: 11/07/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Attilio J. Balbo, appointed counsel for Hosea Sherrod in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Sherrod’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2