Court Opinion

ID: 5413926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:13:55.514731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:55.534077
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

The municipal ordinance in evidence;, among other things, provides:
“ Sec. 388. No person shall sell or offer for sale any commodity or article of merchandise in any market or in the public streets or in any other place in The City of New York, at or for a greater weight or measure than the true measure or weight thereof * * *. No person shall violate any of the provisions of this section under a penalty of one hundred dollars for each offense.”
Defendant, conducting a delicatessen store, in the borough of Queens, sold and delivered to one of two inspectors of the bureau of weights and measures a pound of butter, which, upon being immediately and in his presence reweighed, was found to contain but fourteen and one-half ounces.
The fact that the purchaser and her male companion were such inspectors, of itself, raised no presumption against the credibility of their testimony and there is no evidence showing interest or bias on the part of either of them.
The proofs are convincing and clearly preponderate as to the sale by short weight of the butter, and defendant’s violation of the ordinance in the short weight sale of the butter, especially, was seemingly so well established that the conclusion of the trial justice to the contrary was unreasonable and against the weight of evidence.
Present: Maddox, Blackmar and Putnam, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.