Court Opinion

ID: 9902704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-27 15:22:01.862968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:59.232745
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                       Case No. 5D23-670
                 LT Case No. 2021-CF-000745-A
                 _____________________________

BRAYANT ELWYN MCCULLOUGH,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M.
Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                       September 15, 2023

PER CURIAM.

     In this Anders 1 appeal, after careful review of the record, we
affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences on all counts and in

    1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
all respects, except as to the $150 cost of prosecution imposed in
the written judgment. Although the State requested the sum of
$150, it offered no proof that costs in excess of $100 had been
incurred, thereby failing to comply with section 938.27(2)(c)(8),
Florida Statutes (2022). Furthermore, the trial court, during
sentencing, orally stated that $100 cost of prosecution would be
assessed. “Where a conflict exists between the oral pronouncement
of sentence and written sentencing documents, the oral
pronouncement controls [including as to assessment of costs].”
Chrystie v. State, 95 So. 3d 1027, 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

     Accordingly, we remand for entry of an amended judgment
imposing $100 as the cost of prosecution, but otherwise affirm.

    AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of an amended judgment.

EDWARDS, C.J., JAY, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

                                2