Court Opinion

ID: 9367240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-31 13:09:17.970038+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:58.464393
License: Public Domain

FILE COPY

                                  COURT OF APPEALS
REBECA C. MARTINEZ                 FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT                 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
  CHIEF JUSTICE                      CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER                   CLERK OF COURT
PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ                     300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200
LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA                    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037
IRENE RIOS                          WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX                        TELEPHONE
BETH WATKINS                                                                           (210) 335-2635
LIZA A. RODRIGUEZ
LORI I. VALENZUELA                                                                    FACSIMILE NO.
  JUSTICES                                                                             (210) 335-2762

                                          January 24, 2023

         Andrew Upton                                     Kevin J. Keith
         Mayer LLP                                        Mayer LLP
         750 N. St. Paul St., Suite 700                   750 N. Saint Paul Street Suite 700
         Dallas, TX 75201-3207                            Dallas, TX 75201
         * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *                         * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

         Honorable Norma Gonzales                         Thomas A. Crosley
         Judge, 131st District Court                      The Crosley Law Firm, P.C.
         100 Dolorosa St, 2nd Fl                          3303 Oakwell Ct.
         San Antonio, TX 78205-3028                       Suite 200
         * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *                         San Antonio, TX 78218
                                                          * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

         RE:     Court of Appeals Number: 04-22-00805-CV
                 Trial Court Case Number:    2022CI02105
                 Style: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
                        v.
                        Brooks W. Boenig and Bridget B. Connolly-Boenig

                 Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has
         issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

                 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

                                                           Very truly yours,
                                                           MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
                                                           Clerk of Court

                                                           _____________________________
                                                           Monica Rivera
                                                           Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53855
                                                 FILE COPY

cc: Coleman Proctor (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Debbie Doolittle (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Steven Nuñez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Jennafer Gayle Groswith (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Gloria A. Martinez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
William Roberts (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Ryan G. Anderson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
                                                                                      FILE COPY

                           Fourth Court of Appeals
                                  San Antonio, Texas
                                       January 24, 2023

                                     No. 04-22-00805-CV

                      UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Rasier, LLC,
                                  Appellants

                                               v.

                    Brooks W. BOENIG and Bridget B. Connolly-Boenig,
                                      Appellees

                  From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                Trial Court No. 2022CI02105
                        Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

                                        ORDER
      This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying Appellants’ motion to
compel arbitration.
       On January 10, 2023, Appellants moved this court to stay all trial court proceedings until
this court finally disposes of Appellants’ interlocutory appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE ANN. § 171.025(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3; In re Merrill Lynch Tr. Co. FSB, 235 S.W.3d
185, 195 (Tex. 2007).
       On January 18, 2023, Appellees filed their response stating they oppose the motion.
        Appellants’ motion to stay is GRANTED. We STAY all trial court proceedings pending
further order of this court or final disposition of this interlocutory appeal numbered 04-22-
00805-CV. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 171.025(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3; In re
Merrill Lynch Tr. Co. FSB, 235 S.W.3d at 195.

                                                    _________________________________
                                                    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 24th day of January, 2023.
                           FILE COPY

___________________________________
MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court