Court Opinion

ID: 5212313
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:15:23.198084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:23.408766
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
We dh not think the* origin'*!-exhibits should1 be taken- from1 tlie custody of the plaintiffs nor that they" should'be pu-t,to the-ex-pense-of making-copies. If the exhibits? werevacfirally, as* weli-as eohstractively, iff the-possession of", the- court; the defendants? would have > to-pay the-expense" off maMng'cOpies. The plaintiffs should1 furnish the defendants reasonable opportunity to make copies) of1 tlie exhibits’, andiif; appears1 to be undisputed that) that"has1 been done. Inasmuch as the defendant’s time to serve the case on appeal has'-expired'and a. reversal1' of: the? order will)' leave4 Kim"- in- default, liis? time- to- serve the ease on appeal1 may be extended until ten daysiaf ter the service of "a copy" of11 the- order made on' this? appeal: Hirscllberg;- F. J.-, Jénks; Gayffoiy Rich and Mill ex, Jj., concurred:;. Order" reversed; with t'en, dollars: costs and! disbursements; and motion-granted; with. costS;- ten-days1',to s'er-ve.ease, after? s'ervice' o'f copy of this-order; ' ,