Court Opinion

ID: 8674656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:26:05.653863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.852295
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s January 17, 2014, order denying his motion to file a second amended complaint. Because we affirmed the dismissal of his previous complaint, the time period for filing an amended complaint had expired. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Jarvis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellee’s motion to designate Jarvis as a “vexatious litigant,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.