Court Opinion

ID: 9581624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:16:53.579329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:08.435984
License: Public Domain

Bell, Presiding Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the judgment of reversal, but, for the reasons given by Justice Sears-Collins in the second paragraph of her opinion, I disagree with Division 2 (b) of the opinion of the Court, Taylor v. State, 262 Ga. 584, 585 (2b) (422 SE2d 430) (1992), insofar as it holds that the trial court’s use of the term “duty” did not prevent the jury from considering the issue of provocation.