Court Opinion

ID: 5432860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 17:48:45.118994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:41.960504
License: Public Domain

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion Of the Court.
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The endorsements of the notes sued on are not denied with sufficient certainty by the answer; if they were, the defendants ought to have objected to their introduction in evidence.
*138As no such objection was made, the plaintiffs were warranted in supposing it was waived, and the subsequent motion for nonsuit was a surprise upon them which the Court should have relieved, by admitting further testimony.
The power of opening tip a case after it has been once submitted, rests in the sound discretion of the Court hearing the cause, which we will not as a general rule attempt to revise. In this case, however, the plaintiffs have beejMfc^l by the acts of the defendants, and justice requires that a ne^^HBmould be granted*
Ordered accordingly.