Court Opinion

ID: 5512870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 04:25:22.025093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:12.429045
License: Public Domain

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.
The plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Though the fee of the premises was in another, the plaintiff was in possession under a contract of purchase, had made a payment of interest in pursuance thereof and" had made valuable improvements. He, therefore, had an insurable interest in the premises. The omission of disclo*87¡sure of title is not presented by the bill of exceptions as a point raised at the trial, and cannot now be considered.
UTICA, Aug. 1828. Van Nest v. 'Y. eomans.
Judgment for plaintiff.