Court Opinion

ID: 9623660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 06:39:26.947307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:05:33.352550
License: Public Domain

Judge Wells
dissenting.
I am of the opinion that this appeal should not be entertained because of its interlocutory nature, it being an appeal from an order of temporary custody wherein the appellant’s only valid grounds questions the subject matter jurisdiction of the trial court, which is interlocutory, and does not affect a substantial *742right. See Latch v. Latch, 63 N.C. App. 498, 305 S.E. 2d 564 (1983). Under the circumstances, I do not agree that we should allow cer-tiorari, and I therefore vote to dismiss the appeal.