Court Opinion

ID: 9422175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:01:33.044962+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:34.684791
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Stewart,
concurring.
I agree that the judgment must be reversed, but I reach that conclusion by a route much more direct than the one traveled by the Court. In upholding Eagle’s right to deny service to the appellant solely because of his race, the Supreme Court of Delaware relied upon a statute of that State which permits the proprietor of a restaurant to refuse to serve “persons whose reception or entertainment by him would be offensive to the major part of his customers . . . .” * There is no suggestion in the record that the appellant as an individual was such a person. The highest court of Delaware has thus construed this *727legislative enactment as authorizing discriminatory classification based exclusively on color. Such a law seems to me clearly violative of the Fourteenth Amendment. I think, therefore, that the appeal was properly taken, and that the statute, as authoritatively construed by the Supreme Court of Delaware, is constitutionally invalid.

24 Del. Code, § 1501. The complete text of the statute is set out in the Court opinion at note 1.