Court Opinion

ID: 9793529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:49:14.517535+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:51.234609
License: Public Domain

DOOLING, J.
I concur. If I felt free to do so I would be inclined to hold the expert from Reno sufficiently qualified, but the trend of recent decisions culminating with Huffman v. Lindquist, 37 Cal.2d 465 [234 P.2d 34], indicates too clearly ■ an opposite view in a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court for me to feel free to do other than concur.
A petition for a rehearing was denied November 8, 1952, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 8, 1952. Carter, J., and Schauer, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.