Court Opinion

ID: 9457823
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:33:53.944712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:31.343018
License: Public Domain

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge
(concurring in the result).
I concur in the result solely because I feel reversal is required under Sicurella v. United States, 348 U.S. 385, 391-392, 75 S.Ct. 403, 99 L.Ed. 436 (1955) and Caverly v. United States, 429 F.2d 92, 95 (CA 8 1970). Specifically, it is my view that reversal is in order because it cannot be determined which of the two grounds the local board applied in denying conscientious objector status to the defendant.