Court Opinion

ID: 9678951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:37:13.691954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:08.997282
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing or Application to Transfer to the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM:
Prior to filing in this court any motion for rehearing or application for transfer to the Supreme Court, respondent *339on October 1, 1976, and contrary to Rule 88.02, V.A.M.R., filed in the Supreme Court his “Application for Transfer,” which court, on the same day of filing, denied said application. Thereafter on October 4, 1976, respondent filed in this court his motion for rehearing and an alternative application for transfer. In contradiction of the patent purpose of the motion, the written suggestions and a telegram accompanying it, urged this court, inter alia, to “deny a rehearing and transfer this case to the Supreme Court.” Thus, and in substance, this court was petitioned to oblige the admitted frivolousness of the motion and grant the application in a tacit overruling of the prior denial by the Supreme Court. Albeit we stand willing to accommodate respondent on the motion, we possess neither the authority nor the temerity to grant him succor on the application. Accordingly, respondent’s motion for rehearing and application for transfer are denied.
All concur.