Court Opinion

ID: 7385582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:16:43.19186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:20.603994
License: Public Domain

Note. — As to what circumstances will be deemed sufficient to entitle a party to a certiorari see Chambers v. Smith, post 366, Robertson v. Stowe, post 402, McMillan v. Smith & Walker, 2 Car. Law Rep. 77, Dyer v. Rich, 2 Car Law Rep. 610, Steele v. Harris, ibid. 636, Hood v. Orr, N. C. Term Rep. 151, Davis v. Marshall & Russell, 2 Hawks, 59, Mera v. Scales & McCain, ibid. 364. zThe propriety of the other part of the decision was denied by Haywood Judge, in an anonymous case, post 171.