Court Opinion

ID: 8118855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:49:12.952088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:54.198684
License: Public Domain

Ford, Judge:
The cases listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:
, That the items marked “A”, and checked HM (Import Spec’s Initials) by Import Specialist Harry Menchenfreund (Import Spec’s *132Name) on. tbe invoices covered by the protests enumerated above, consist of plastic boxes, assessed with duty at 27% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1211 of the Tariff Act of 1980, as modified, and paragraph 1559, as amended, on the basis that said boxes are containers for fishing lines, and an additional duty of 19 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397, as modified, and paragraph 1559 as amended of said Act, and in accordance with Section 501 of said Act on the basis that said boxes were unusual containers.
That said plastic boxes are not containers for fishing lines, but are in fact separate articles of commerce and as such are not subject to duty under paragraph 1211 and Section 504, but dutiable at 19 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930l as modified, and paragraph 1559 as amended.
That the matters herein be remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for a determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law.
That the protests be deemed submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked with the letter “A”,, as aforesaid.
Accepting the foregoing stipulation of fact, we find and hold that there were no separate appraisements for the accompanying plastic boxes and fishing lines. Since it has been agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties that the plastic boxes and fishing lines are separate articles of commerce, the appraisement and liquidation are void.
Accordingly, said protest filed against such void liquidation is premature, and the involved protests are hereby dismissed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings to a single judge sitting hi reap-praisement for determination of the separate value of the plastic boxes and fishing lines in the manner provided by law.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.