Court Opinion

ID: 5583220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:45:46.816815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:08.993024
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The rulings on the admissibility of evidence show no cause for reversal. On conflicting' evidence the judge did not err in his judgment granting in part, and refusing in part, the temporary injunction as prayed.

Judgment affirmed on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions.

All the Justices concur.

Mayson & Johnson, for plaintiffs in error in main bill of exceptions,
cited, on width of entrance: Turner v. Thompson, 58 Ga. 268 (24 Am. R. 497), s. c. 69 Ga. 219; Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co., 55 Wash. 595; Lindbloom v. Berkman, 43 Wash. 356 (86 Pac. 567); Kitchen Hotel Co. v. Philbin, 2 Neb. Unoff. 340 (96 N. W. 487); Walker v. Clifford, 128 Ala. 67 (29 So. 588); Ward v. Robertson, 77 Iowa, 159 (41 N. W. 603); Cummings v. Perry, 177 Mass. 407 (58 N. E. 1083); Agate v. Lowenbein, 4 Daly (N. Y.), 62; Vidvard v. Cushman, 23 Hun (N. Y.), 434; Oakford v. Nixon, 177 Pa. 76 (35 Atl. 588). On signs at entrance: Salinger v. North American Woolen Mills, 70 W. Va. 151 (73 S. E. 312); Booth v. Gaither, 58 Ill. App. 263; McNair v. Ames, 68 Atl. 950 ; Lawrence v. Springer, 49 N. J. Eq. 289 (24 Atl. 933); Crosdale v. Lanigan, 129 N. Y. 604 (29 N. E. 824, 26 Am. St. R. 551); Johnson v. Stillman, 29 Minn. 95 (43 N. W. 192); Cronkhite v. Cronkhite, 94 N. Y. 323; Baker v. L. & N. R. Co., 65 Miss. 172; St. Louis Stock Yards v. Wiggins, 112 Ill. 384; Tanner v. Valentine, 75 Ill. 625; Collins v. Macey, 25 Conn. 239; Wilson v. St. Paul &c. Ry. Co., 41 Minn. 56 (42 N. W. 600, 4 L. R. A. 378); Houston v. Laffee, 46 N. H. 505; Dunneen v. Rich, 22 Wis. 524; Simpson v. Wright, 21 Ill. App. 67; Brown v. *609Woodworth, 5 Barb. 550; Kivett v. McKeithen, 90 N C. 106; Hitchens v. Shaller, 32 Mich. 496; Owen v. Field, 12 Allen, 457; Jones, Land. & Ten. § 40. On glass partitions, and light on stairway: Smyth v. Nelson, 135 Ga. 96; Holden v. Tidwell, 37 Okla. 553 (133 Pac. 54); 16 R. C. L. 709, 716, and cit.
James W. Austin and Charles T. & John L. Hopkins, contra,
cited: DeFoor v. Stephens, 133 Ga. 617; Darnell v. Columbus &c. Co., 129 Ga. 62; Asa G. Candler Inc. v. Ga. Theater Co., 148 Ga. 188, and cit.; 24 Cyc. 1045, 1046; Lidgerding v. Zignego, 77 Minn. 421 (80 N. W. 360); Edmison v. Lowry, 17 L. R. A. 275; Case v. Minot, 22 L. R. A. 536; Tremont Theater Co. v. Bruno, 225 Mass. 461 (114 N. E. 672); Flanagan v. Welch, 220 Mass. 186 (107 N. E. 979); Rojas v. Seeger, 122 La. 218 (47 So. 532); Miller v. Fitzgerald Co., 62 Neb. 270 (86 N. W. 1078) ; Gans v. Hughes, 14 N. Y. Supp. 930; O’Neill v. Breese, 23 N. Y. Supp. 526; Vinissky v. Lazovsky, 155 Ill. App. 596; Riddle v. Littlefield, 53 N. H. 503; 9 R. C. L. 754, § 21, 763, § 27, and cit.; Note to German Saving &c. Co. v. Gordon, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 331; Kelly v. Dunning, 43 N. J. Eq. 62; Toothe v. Bryce, 50 N. J. Eq. 589; Curtiss v. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 73; Morrison v. King, 62 Ill. 30; Powers v. Heffernan, 233 Ill. 597 (84 N. E. 661, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 523); National Bank v. Cunningham, 46 O. St. 575; Civil Code, § 4628.