Court Opinion

ID: 2964807
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:31:24.165184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:40.396847
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                ____________________
       No. 97-1205
                                 ANA MARIA CAMACHO,
                                Plaintiff, Appellant,
                                         v.
                        FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTADO, ET AL.,
                               Defendants, Appellees.
                                ____________________
                    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
                  [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
                                ____________________
                                       Before
                              Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                ____________________
            Miguel E. Miranda on brief for appellant.
            Zaida Prieto-Rivera  on brief for  appellee Fondo Del  Seguro Del
       Estado.
                                ____________________
                                    July 7, 1997
                                ____________________

                 Per 
                    Curiam. 
                            
                            As 
                               appellant did not file a motion under Fed.
            R. Civ. P. 50 before the  district court, and as she has  not
            provided us with transcripts of the jury trial, we are unable
            to review her contention that the evidence was such that  the
            jury's 
                  verdict should be set aside.  See Hammond v. T.J. Litle
            & Co., 82 F.3d 1166,  1171 (1st Cir. 1996); Muniz Ramirez  v.
            Puerto 
                  Rico 
                      Fire 
                           Services, 757 F.2d 1357, 1358 (1st Cir. 1985).
            Moreover, our review of the documents included in appellant's
            appendix suggests that the jury may have resolved conflicting
            evidence about defendants' conduct  or other elements of  the
            claim;  in  no  event   would  we  second-guess  the   jury's
            determination
                         of the weight and credibility due that evidence.
                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                                         -2-