Court Opinion

ID: 1006662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:24.685235+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:11.451947
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-7756

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES QUEEN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-98-35-WMN, CA-99-2473-WMN)

Submitted:     January 31, 2002          Decided:    February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Queen, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James Queen appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Queen, Nos. CR-98-35-WMN; CA-99-2473-

WMN (D. Md. Aug. 13, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2