Court Opinion

ID: 23840
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:14:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:10.556490
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                        _______________________

                              No. 00-60841
                            Summary Calendar
                      Civil Docket # 3:00-CV-94-B
                        _______________________

            In The Matter Of: U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT;
          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JIMMY W. CROSS;
                 F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,

                                                                   Debtors.
                         ______________________

                             HENRY BOYD, JR.,

                                                                 Appellant,

                                  versus

    U.S.A./RURAL DEVELOPMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE;
        JIMMY W. CROSS; F. WOODROW BROWN; WILLIAM SIMPSON,

                                                       Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Northern District of Mississippi
_________________________________________________________________
                           April 4, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

           Appellant Boyd has taxed the courts’ patience too long in

his attempts to circumvent the effects of foreclosure on his home

a dozen years ago and payments required to be made to FMHA under a

Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan.         The instant appeal of yet another

     *
            Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
dismissal of a frivolous claim is indecipherable.     Boyd raises no

legal or factual issues that make sense.   He has been warned before

about frivolous appeals.     See Boyd v. Barkley, 166 F.3d 341 (5th

Cir. 1998) (unpublished).

          We now dismiss this appeal as frivolous and impose

sanctions.    Boyd may not file any more appeals or related papers in

this court unless he obtains prior written consent of a judge of

this court.

          Appeal DISMISSED; Sanctions Imposed.

                                  2