Court Opinion

ID: 9473361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 04:27:56.680136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:43:29.343013
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Fed*88eral Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GAR-WOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.