Court Opinion

ID: 681919
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:39:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.947167
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1177
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Bob JASZENKO, Petitioner Appellant,v.Joseph P. SACCHET, Warden;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6297.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.Decided Oct. 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-619-HAR)
Bob Jaszenko, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sarah Elizabeth Page, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Jaszenko v. Sacchet, No. CA-93-619-HAR (D. Md. Mar. 1, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED