Court Opinion

ID: 9367525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-01 01:00:20.480481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:00.979107
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10704         Document: 00516629800             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/31/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                                      FILED
                                       No. 22-10704                             January 31, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   William Lamar Smith,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:22-CR-12-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent William Lamar Smith has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10704    Document: 00516629800         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/31/2023

                                 No. 22-10704

   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2