Court Opinion

ID: 5118926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-18 07:17:34.464552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:10.449669
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-21-00240-CV

                               COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                       CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ROGELIO HINOJOSA RIOS,                                                            Appellant,

                                                     v.

OBDULIA BELTRAN BEZERA RIOS,                        Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina
                  Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
       Appellant, Rogelio Hinojosa Rios, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order

entered by the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. CL-21-

0857-G. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from

which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. The Clerk of this Court

notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could
be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal and then

an agreed motion to withdraw appeal.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, appellant’s agreed motion to withdraw, which

was construed as a motion to dismiss, is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a),(c).

                                                                      JAIME TIJERINA
                                                                      Justice

Delivered and filed on the
14th day of October, 2021.

                                             2