Court Opinion

ID: 8462212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:18:31.618771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.207377
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Woods appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woods, No. 3:05-cr-00025-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.