Court Opinion

ID: 9838346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-06 06:10:06.202039+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:32.804328
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed August 31, 2023

                                   S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00782-CV

                      IN RE LARRY K. ANDERS, Relator

          Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court
                            Collin County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. 429-05551-2018

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia
                            Opinion by Justice Garcia

      In his August 9, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from

the trial court’s order reinstating the case following a dismissal for want of

prosecution.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Dennise Garcia/
                                         DENNISE GARCIA
                                         JUSTICE
230782F.P05

                                      –2–