Court Opinion

ID: 9831193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:53:52.092719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:32.324565
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing appellants insist that the temporary restraining order granted-by the. trial court is too broad, in that it not only restrains appellants from carrying out the contract they entered into for paving said street in front of the property of appellees abutting on Holmes street, but restrains them from carrying out the contract on any other portion of Holmes street. When the injunction order is read as a whole, we do not believe it is subject to such construction; but, in order that there may be no question in reference thereto, we modify the injunction order so as to cause it to apply only to carrying out that portion of the contract which by its terms would place a lien upon appellees’ property.