Court Opinion

ID: 9838072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-04 12:07:18.914148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.864955
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued August 29, 2023

                                      In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The

                          First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00396-CV
                            ———————————
                       RONALD CAMPBELL, Appellant
                                         V.
FAIZAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., ASIF RAZZAK, AND HARIS RASHID,
                        Appellees

             On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 1130859

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Ronald Campbell, appeals from a judgment signed on May 17,

2023. Appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and

has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed
due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a),

101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in

the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Appellant failed to respond to

our notices of June 22, 2023 (past due filing fee) and July 25, 2023 (non-payment

for clerk’s record) which advised appellant that should he not provide proof of

payment for the filing fee and for preparation of the clerk’s record or establish

indigence, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing

enforcement of rule), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record

filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

      We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

                                          2