Court Opinion

ID: 996777
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:55:27.274683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:03.778401
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LEROY HOUSTON, III,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-96-155, CA-97-1083-AM)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Houston, III, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Margaret Flint, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Houston, Nos. CR-96-155; CA-97-1083-AM

(E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2