Court Opinion

ID: 3970942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:29:41.676705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:28.065268
License: Public Domain

Ludwig Klein, defendant in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment rendered against him upon the verdict of a jury in favor of S. M. Brightwell, plaintiff, for $375 as damages for the breach of an alleged contract of the defendant to sell plaintiff 40 head of beef cattle for $125 per head.
In support of his allegation that defendant contracted and agreed to sell the cattle for $125 per head, plaintiff testified that in a conversation over the telephone with Carl Klein, defendant's son, he told the latter that he would give defendant $125 per head for the cattle, and requested that the offer be communicated to defendant and that witness be informed whether or not defendant was willing to accept it; that there was then a break in the conversation, immediately following which the conversation over the telephone was resumed, and then Carl Klein reported to witness that he had communicated plaintiff's offer to defendant and that defendant had agreed to accept it.
The testimony was objected to by defendant on the ground that it was hearsay, and in overruling the objection the court committed reversible error. T.  P. Ry. Co. v. Felker, 44 Tex. Civ. App. 420, 99 S.W. 439.
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded, without reference to other questions presented in appellant's brief, which will not be discussed or determined.