Court Opinion

ID: 2777313
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-05 22:01:00.171511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:11.951354
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                             FEB 05 2015

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10012

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01021-GMS-1

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
MOISES HUIZAR-FLORES, a.k.a.
Moises Flores Huizar, a.k.a. Moises
Huizar, a.k.a. Moses Huizar, a.k.a. Ranato
Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar-Martinez,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted September 30, 2014**

Before:        HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

       Moises Huizar-Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Huizar-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Huizar-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro

se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

       Huizar-Flores has waived his right to appeal his reentry of a removed alien

conviction and 46-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue

as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v.

Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      DISMISSED.

                                          2