Court Opinion

ID: 9735264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 18:07:10.510098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:56.388417
License: Public Domain

BECK, Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the result. While I am persuaded that the instant case is correctly decided, I find the majority’s attempt to distinguish Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. Weiner, 431 Pa.Super. 276, 636 A.2d 649 (1993), unsuccessful.
I do not agree that the acts alleged in Weiner were accidental. They appear to have been as intentional as the acts alleged in this case, where the majority correctly concludes *65that the insurance company does not have a duty to defend because the acts complained of were intentional.