Court Opinion

ID: 995575
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:39:17.234722+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:59.934833
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6516

ROBERT LEWIS CAIN,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-97-342-3)

Submitted:   June 23, 1998                 Decided:   July 13, 1998

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lewis Cain, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. Cain v. Angelone, CA-97-342-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1998).

We also deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. In

addition, we deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing with a sugges-

tion for rehearing in banc. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2