Court Opinion

ID: 550999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:12.687436
License: Public Domain

918 F.2d 174Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Habibur RAHMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-7338.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CR-88-146, CA-90-734)
Habibur Rahman, appellant pro se.
Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Habibur Rahman appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*   United States v. Rahman, CR-88-146, CA-90-734 (D.Md. May 16, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 We deny Rahman's motion for appointment of counsel