Court Opinion

ID: 657194
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:55:01+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:51.992571
License: Public Domain

9 F.3d 477
Russell AIKEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 92-6154, 92-6159.
United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 3, 1994.

Before:  MERRITT, Chief Judge;  KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc.  Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.