Court Opinion

ID: 9353011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-10 19:00:48.811229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:17.828192
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10548         Document: 00516604268             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/10/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-10548
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                                January 10, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Terrence Rashard Hill,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:12-CR-136-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrence
   Rashard Hill has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hill has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10548    Document: 00516604268          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/10/2023

                                  No. 22-10548

   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2