Court Opinion

ID: 2950209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:20:52.367362+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:42.254855
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

NO. WR-51,831-02

IN RE KENNETH LEON CRAFT, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. CR22080 D IN THE 142ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM MIDLAND COUNTY

            Per curiam.

O R D E R

            Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 142nd District Court of Midland County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the
application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.  Although Relator alleges that the trial court
entered an order designating issues on July 10, 2013, this Court has no record of such order and
Relator does not provide a copy of the order with his application.
            In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  Respondent, the District Clerk of
Midland County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such
habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Midland County.  Should the
response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was
served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response.  This application for
leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the
appropriate response.  Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: January 15, 2014
Do not publish