Court Opinion

ID: 8676427
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:23:16.557848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.252891
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathon Earl Marshall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Marshall has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Marshall completed the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, this appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.