Court Opinion

ID: 7505623
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:31:04.596254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:19.891244
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his- motion is affirmed. See: State v. Reasbeck, 359 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Rule 3.170(g), Fla.R.Crim.P.