Court Opinion

ID: 2772527
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-23 07:46:16.748935+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:48.128197
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                           SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                FORT WORTH

                               NO. 02-14-00489-CR

DARRELL WAYNE PHILLIPS                                              APPELLANT

                                        V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                       STATE

                                     ----------

          FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
                      TRIAL COURT NO. 0557784D

                                     ----------

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

                                     ----------

      On June 9, 2014, the trial court denied appellant’s pro se motion

requesting DNA testing, which he filed under chapter 64 of the code of criminal

procedure. 2 After the due date for a notice of appeal but within the time period

      1
         See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
      2
         See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01–.05 (West 2006 & Supp.
2014).
for requesting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, appellant filed a

notice of appeal. 3 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3; see also Swearingen v.

State, 189 S.W.3d 779, 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“[A] DNA movant must meet

applicable filing and time requirements found in the Rules of Appellate

Procedure.”). But he did not file a timely motion to extend the time to file his

notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Later, appellant filed a “subsequent”

notice of appeal. The trial court appointed counsel to represent appellant on

appeal.

      On December 5, 2014, we sent a letter to appellant that expressed our

concern that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely.

We informed appellant that unless he filed a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal, it could be dismissed. Appellant filed a response in which

he agreed that we lack jurisdiction and conceded that dismissal is appropriate.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(b), 26.2(a), 26.3(b), 43.2(f); see also Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day

[extension] period but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate

court lacks jurisdiction.”); Brock v. State, No. 02-14-00310-CR, 2014 WL
3
        Appellant’s original notice of appeal bears a file-stamped date of July 22,
2014. His certificate of service on the notice of appeal states that he sent it to
the district clerk on July 13, 2014.

                                         2
5492730, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 30, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not

designated for publication) (applying Olivo).

                                                PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 22, 2015

                                         3