Court Opinion

ID: 1415711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:01:53.656834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:57:48.864869
License: Public Domain

600 S.E.2d 466 (2004)
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Marcos Antonio VALAZQUEZ.
No. 96P04.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 24, 2004.
Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Marcos Antonio Valazquez.
Thomas Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everitt, for State.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of March 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."