Court Opinion

ID: 7421995
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:43:20.459877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:21.220210
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross-petition we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 23, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The cross-petition is denied.
The Petitioner’s petition for attorney’s fees is also denied. The petition filed by Petitioner for defending against the cross-petition is granted in the amount of $250.00.
THORNAL, C. J., and TPIOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.