Court Opinion

ID: 6635927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:40:00.881878+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:44.397077
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel Alengon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet lace articles like those passed on in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and embroidered wearing apparel similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.