Court Opinion

ID: 558269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:10:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:48.309740
License: Public Domain

929 F.2d 694Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Eddie SIZEMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.David L. SMITH, Assistant Warden;  K.M. Payne, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6506.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 4, 1991.Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-90-206-R)
Eddie Sizemore, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanette Dian Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Eddie Sizemore appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Sizemore v. Smith, CA-90-206-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 7, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED