Court Opinion

ID: 8072721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:38:27.26623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:15.247449
License: Public Domain

SCOTT, J.
Upon the evidence as disclosed by the return the plaintiff failed to make out a case against this appellant because he did not prove service of notice of dishonor, an affidavit of non-service having'been filed with the answer. Code Civ. Proc. § 923. The respondent protests that the return does not contain certain evidence, which, as he says, would supply the defect of proof, and he submits with his brief what he declares to #>e a transcript of the omitted testimony. Of course, we cannot look beyond the return for the purpose of determining this appeal; but, if it were allowable to consider what is alleged to be the omitted testimony, it would be found that the defect in evidence is not supplied thereby, so far as this appellant is concerned. We think that justice will be best served if this cause be sent back for a retrial.
Judgment reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.