Court Opinion

ID: 6775931
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:49:56.351218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:48.139010
License: Public Domain

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I through IV.
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on Proposition of Law No. V and remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Goldfuss v. Davidson (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 116, 679 N.E.2d 1099.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.