Court Opinion

ID: 543364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:41.467547
License: Public Domain

905 F.2d 1532
Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rondell Herbert GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-7147.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 1990.Decided May 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge.  (CR No. 85-405-H)
Rondell Herbert Garrison, appellant pro se.
Catherine Curtis Blake, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Rondell Herbert Garrison appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Garrison, CR-85-405-H (D.Md. Feb. 28 and Apr. 18, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.