Court Opinion

ID: 2692111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:17:49.687766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:36.745681
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Derov, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1111.]

             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DEROV, APPELLEE.
          [Cite as State v. Derov, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1111.]
Judgment of the court of appeals reversed in part and appeal dismissed in part as
        improvidently accepted — Notice of certified conflict dismissed for want of
        a conflict.
   (Nos. 2008-0853 and 2008-0858 — Submitted February 4, 2009 — Decided
                                     March 18, 2009.)
   APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County,
               No. 07 MA 71, 176 Ohio App.3d 43, 2008-Ohio-1672.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The record in the trial court concerning the portable breathalyzer
test used in this case is not sufficient to support either the statements in the
opinion of the court of appeals regarding the use of the portable breathalyzer and
the value of its test results or the judgment that the trial court should not have
considered the results of the portable breath test. Accordingly, that portion of the
judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the
court of appeals for further proceedings.
        {¶ 2} In view of the foregoing disposition of appellant’s Proposition of
Law No. II, the notice of certified conflict is dismissed for want of a conflict.
        {¶ 3} Sua sponte, the appeal is dismissed as to appellant’s Proposition of
Law Nos. I and III as having been improvidently accepted.
        {¶ 4} The opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority
except by the parties inter se.
        MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and
CUPP, JJ., concur.
                            SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

       PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent in part and would dismiss the cause
as having been improvidently accepted.
                              __________________
       Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ralph M.
Rivera, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
       Robert C. Kokor, for appellee.
       Lamkin, Van Eman, Trimble, Beals & Dougherty, L.L.C., and Timothy L.
Van Eman, urging reversal for amicus curiae Mothers Against Drunk Driving.
       Joseph R. Macejko, Youngstown City Prosecutor, urging reversal for
amicus curiae city of Youngstown.
       Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General,
and Jason Patrick Small, Deputy Solicitor, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio
Attorney General.
       Timothy Huey; and Atway & Cochran, L.L.C., and Scott R. Cochran,
urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense
Lawyers.
                           ______________________

                                         2