Court Opinion

ID: 1002600
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:13:18.941131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:23.018973
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6980

DAVID E. COOPER,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

D. SCOTT DODRILL,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-426-5-HC)

Submitted:   September 21, 2000        Decided:   September 29, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David E. Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Cooper v. Dodrill, No. CA-00-426-5-HC (E.D.N.C. June

26, 2000).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2