Court Opinion

ID: 5596263
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 02:38:25.152658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:36.665041
License: Public Domain

Ingram, Justice,
dissenting.
Certiorari was originally granted to consider the correctness of this court’s decision in Hatch v. O’Neill, 231 Ga. 446 (202 SE2d 44) (1973), which was followed by a closely divided Court of Appeals in this case.
I dissent to the dismissal of the writ of certiorari as I think Hatch v. O’Neill, supra, is wrong and should be overruled by this court. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the Court óf Appeals in this case and affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.