Court Opinion

ID: 9430895
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:30:49.707065+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:00.230082
License: Public Domain

Justice White,
dissenting.
I agree with Parts I and II of Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion. Although I do not join Part III, I also would overrule Weber. My understanding of Weber was, and is, that the employer’s plan did not violate Title VII because it was designed to remedy the intentional and systematic exclusion of blacks by the employer and the unions from certain job categories. That is how I understood the phrase “traditionally segregated jobs” that we used in that case. The Court now interprets it to mean nothing more than a manifest imbalance between one identifiable group and another in an employer’s labor force. As so interpreted, that case, as well as today’s decision, as Justice Scalia so well demonstrates, is a perversion of Title VIL I would overrule Weber and reverse the judgment below.