Court Opinion

ID: 4179314
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-21 00:03:50.430303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:36.993310
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-11513      Document: 00514041073         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/20/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 16-11513                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      June 20, 2017
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                              Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUDY LOPEZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:16-CR-122-12

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Rudy Lopez has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-11513      Document: 00514041073   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/20/2017

                                 No. 16-11513

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2