Court Opinion

ID: 3325128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:42:21.505092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:29.291694
License: Public Domain

This is a scire facias proceeding in pursuance of our garnishment statute (Gen. Stat. [1930] § 5763.) It involves that part of the statute covering "any debt, legacy or distributive share" that is or may become due to a defendant from the estate of a deceased person.
In the original action (No. 55517, Superior Court, New Haven County) this defendant was garnisheed. The defendant debtor in the original action had an interest in the estate of one Peter Corato. The defendant is his administratrix. While our court has construed the word "due" in our foreign attachment statute in the sense of "owing" rather than in the more restricted sense of "payable" (Finch vs. Great AmericanIns. Co., 101 Conn. 332, 335), nevertheless judgment on scirefacias cannot be rendered against an administrator before the time when it becomes his duty to deliver to the legatee the distributive share attached. Johnes vs. Jackson, 67 Conn. 81,91.
Under the facts here distribution was ordered after the acceptance of the account on April 19, 1941; hence it was payable. But the defendant says Corato was indebted to her in an amount greater than the amount for which distribution was ordered. We have no decisions that could be located on set-off *Page 447 
in garnishment proceedings. It is true, too, that no claim was ever pressed by this defendant against the debtor. This does not prevent the assertion of a set-off whatever effect it might have on the prosecution of an affirmative claim.
   However, until the pleading of set-off is put in the form and substance of such a claim judgment will be withheld.