Court Opinion

ID: 993234
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:04:31.607153+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:35.820779
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6697

TAMI GARNETT-TREADWELL,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM RHODES, in his individual capacity,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-95-1014)

Submitted:   September 25, 1997           Decided:   October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tami Garnett-Treadwell, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Christopher Sams,
Barbara Tuck Lovell, SAMS & HAWKINS, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Garnett-Treadwell v. Rhodes, No. CA-95-1014 (E.D. Va. Apr. 4,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2