Court Opinion

ID: 9739102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:08:46.435131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:10.021022
License: Public Domain

KALITOWSKI, Judge
(concurring in part, dissenting in part).
I concur in the majority’s determination that the trial court erred in refusing to hear appellant’s claim on the basis of res judicata. However I reach this conclusion for a different reason. I would hold res judicata does not apply on the limited grounds that appellant’s circumstances have changed because she has now filed an attestation of no further information.
I respectfully dissent concerning the relief granted appellant. I believe this matter should be remanded to the Commissioner for a determination of appellant’s cooperation in light of both her attestation of no further information and the provisions of 45 C.F.R. § 232.12(b) (1991).