Court Opinion

ID: 9300564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:07:01.04684+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:40.195987
License: Public Domain

It appeared, on examination, that an alternative mandamus had already been granted in the case, and partially heard, and this part of the case was not now pressed, but it was intimated by Judge EMMONS that, having had occasion to examine this question, he was dear that according to the true theory of the laws bearing upon this subject, and repudiating entirely the idea that the courts of the two systems, federal and state, were in any sense to be considered foreign or antagonistic to each other, it was competent for the court to grant such a writ, and with the same freedom as if between courts of the same jurisdiction, but both judges concurred that as it appeared in this case that a transcript of the proceedings in the common pleas had been in fact filed in this court within the time prescribed by law (although filed by the defendants), the original case of Lewis v. White [Case No. 8,335] was properly entered and pending in this court, and therefore the court ordered the same to be docketed by the clerk, and that the respondents should file their answer by the first Monday in January, and the cause be proceeded with here, and that all further proceedings in the state court would, by the express terms of the act of congress, be void.