Court Opinion

ID: 2691036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:57:33.415507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:08.130220
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Brock v. Niemeyer, 130 Ohio St.3d 80, 2011-Ohio-4704.]

         BROCK, APPELLANT, v. NIEMEYER, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.
        [Cite as Brock v. Niemeyer, 130 Ohio St.3d 80, 2011-Ohio-4704.]
Complaints—Jurisdiction—Failure to invoke original or appellate jurisdiction of
        court of appeals—Dismissal of complaint affirmed.
(No. 2011-0470—Submitted September 7, 2011—Decided September 21, 2011.)
      APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hancock County, No. 5-11-03.
                                 __________________
        Per Curiam.
        {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint and denying the
motion of appellant, Dennis R. Brock, to allow his cause to proceed. Brock’s
complaint alleged violations of his civil rights pursuant to R.C. 2921.52(E).
Brock’s complaint invoked neither the original nor the appellate jurisdiction of
the court of appeals. Section 3(B)(1) and (2), Article IV, Ohio Constitution. We
also deny appellant’s motions for leave to correct and to direct the appellate court
to attach requested documents.
                                                                  Judgment affirmed.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                                 __________________
        Dennis R. Brock, pro se.
                              ______________________