Court Opinion

ID: 2741047
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-09 07:08:05.66544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:57:32.412886
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00482-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

STEPHEN FORREST MILLER,                                                      Appellant,

                                            v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 148th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
                  Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Stephen Forrest Miller, filed a letter with the Court on August 19, 2014

which was interpreted as a notice of appeal. On September 8, 2014 appellant filed a

letter explaining that he did not intend to file a notice of appeal but was merely filing a

letter of inquiry. We construe appellant’s letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the
motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS

the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                        PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
9th day of October, 2014.

                                            2