Court Opinion

ID: 9400909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-09 18:10:56.746079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:48.844360
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

        COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
            00

                                                                                                    NO.     2023 KW 0285
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

                                                                                                          juM        9,    2023
                                    ROMAIN,          JR.
JOSEPH ANDREW                ST.

                                                                                                                                for
                                                       St.            Romain,                  Jr.,         applying
                      Joseph             Andrew
In    Re:                                                                                                                    Court,
                                                                                Judicial                  District
                                                writs,             21st
                      supervisory
                                                                   No.     34954.
                      Parish        of    Livingston,

                                                 HESTER AND MILLER,                        JJ.
BEFORE:               GUIDRY,        C. J.,

            WRITDENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
                                                                 trial                    portions              of     the
Counselfailed                      to     include          the       relevant

                                                                                                      from       the      district
                                                      pertinent               documents
transcript              and               other
                                   any
                                                                      the          claim        that       defense         counsel
                             that        might       support
court            record
                                                                           right          to    effective             assistance
violated relator' s                       Sixth Amendment
                                                                     to       listen           to     a    taped          recording
       counsel             when     counsel           failed
of
                                                                                         motion           to     suppress          the
                 to    trial        and        failed        to      file           a
prior
                                                                                                            Supplementation
                                            identification                    of        relator.
 single           photographic

                                                                           an       application                 for       rehearing
       this           writ     application                 and/ or
 of
                                                                                                          Louisiana          Courts
            not       be    considered.                See         Uniform          Rules           of
 will
                                                                                                         counsel          elects    to
                           Rules        2- 18. 7 &         4- 9.         In     the       event
 of    Appeal,
                                                                                         the application shall be
 file a new application with this court,
                                                                                                                                this
                             before                   11,          2023.            Any    future              filing      on
 filed           on   or                    July
                                                                                                                  application,
                                                                          contents              of       this
 issue           should       include           the    entire

                                                                                                 of       this       ruling.        In
                                                                     and        a       copy
 the        missing          items        noted       above,

 all    other          respects,           the writ application is denied.

                                                                   JMG
                                                                   CHH

                                                                   SMM

     COURT        OF APPEAL,             FIRST    CIRCUIT

                 DEPUTY      CLERK        OF   COURT
                        FOR        THE    COURT