Court Opinion

ID: 4147919
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-23 18:09:19.083915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:28.078964
License: Public Domain

People v Rosario (2017 NY Slip Op 01453)

People v Rosario

2017 NY Slip Op 01453

Decided on February 23, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 23, 2017

Friedman, J.P., Richter, Kapnick, Kahn, JJ.

3185 5038/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vMarvin Rosario, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Joshua L. Haber of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered May 20, 2015,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: FEBRUARY 23, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.