Court Opinion

ID: 2928000
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-12 00:57:08.202778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:48.631753
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 25, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 25, 2002.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-02-00192-CR
____________
 
ENRIQUE EDUARDO PENA ARCE, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On
Appeal from the 179th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial
Court Cause No. 850,836
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M  O
P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
murder.  On February 1, 2002, the trial
court sentenced appellant to confinement for seventy years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that
the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been
filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Opinion
filed July 25, 2002.
Panel consists of Justices
Anderson, Fowler, and Edelman. 
Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).