Court Opinion

ID: 8478258
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:54:35.954951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.521692
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Copeland, No. 8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15 (D.Md. Aug. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.