Court Opinion

ID: 4146732
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-21 19:00:40.506063+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:40.389696
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-10626      Document: 00513882259         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 15-10626
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS MALDONADO-LANDAVERDE, also known as Jesus Maldonado, also
known as Jesus Maldonado-Andaverde,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:15-CR-14-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Maldonado-
Landaverde raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-
Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept.
29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b),
which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-10626    Document: 00513882259     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2017

                                 No. 15-10626

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2014), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of
Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d
at 672. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the
alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                       2