Court Opinion

ID: 8679004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:58:21.640771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.888536
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Avenger Don Ridgeway appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(2012). We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ridgeway v. Warren, No. 5:15-ct03063-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2015). We deny Ridge-way’s motion for an expedited hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.