Court Opinion

ID: 9656061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 19:33:09.59062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:27.553973
License: Public Domain

SMITH, P. J.
(dissenting). In so far as the foregoing opinion deals with the form of the conveyance, I dissent. It is my view that SDC 51.1418 controls, and the vendor was required only “ ‘to execute a conveyance in form sufficient to pass the title to the property.’ ” Boekelheide v. Snyder, 71 S.D. 470, 26 N.W.2d 74, 76. I would modify the judgment to bring it into harmony with this view, and affirm the modified judgment.
ROBERTS, J., concurs.