Court Opinion

ID: 604533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:24:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:02.817731
License: Public Domain

990 F.2d 1261
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Julieo ALBERTO-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-50184.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 23, 1993.Decided April 7, 1993.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Julieo Alberto-Gutierrez appeals his conviction and sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B).

3
Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alberto-Gutierrez's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review.   Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.   Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

4
The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3