Court Opinion

ID: 9942460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-21 07:11:33.066636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:08.861281
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed February 15, 2024

                                      In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-24-00119-CV

  IN RE TEXAS CAPITAL BANK F/K/A TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A.,
                          Relator

          Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-07128

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                 Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove
                           Opinion by Justice Molberg
      Before the Court is relator’s February 6, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus.

Relator challenges the trial court’s January 19, 2024 Order Granting Defendant’s

Motion to Compel the Deposition of Rob Holmes.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

240119f.p05                              /Ken Molberg//
                                         KEN MOLBERG
                                         JUSTICE

                                      –2–