Court Opinion

ID: 9366031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-25 19:01:01.875726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:48.956239
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10651         Document: 00516622419             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/25/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10651
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 25, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Angel Nicole Gonzales,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 5:21-CR-72-7
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Angel Nicole Gonzales has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzales has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10651     Document: 00516622419          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/25/2023

                                   No. 22-10651

   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
          However, there is a clerical error in the written judgment. The
   judgment refers to the offense of conviction as “possession with intent to
   distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine,” but the record reflects
   that Gonzales pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 50 grams
   or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of
   methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii). Accordingly,
   we REMAND for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the
   written judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

                                        2