Court Opinion

ID: 2923713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:51:40.883326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:52:00.815635
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-523-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ARTURO OCHOA GONZALES,	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, ARTURO OCHOA GONZALES, attempts to appeal a conviction for
unauthorized use of a vehicle.  The trial court has certified that "the defendant has waived
the right of appeal."  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
	On August 29, 2007, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant
has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to
whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
	On September 24, 2007, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel's
response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is
incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.  
	The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed.  Any pending motions are denied as moot.

						PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 11th day of October, 2007.