Court Opinion

ID: 9363967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-17 22:04:11.184466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:35.035247
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA
          COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CAMILLE LANDRY AND FRANNIE                         NO.   2022 CW 1152
L. LANDRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ON [BEHALF] OF THEIR MINOR
CHILD, CAMIE LANDRY

VERSUS

PROGRESSIVE SECURITY                                JANUARY 17, 2023
INSURANCE, COMPANY, NATIONAL
SECURITY AND CASUALTY
COMPANY AND COREY J. CROCHET

In Re:     Corey J. Crochet, applying for supervisory writs, 19th
           Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
           No. 661202.

BEFORE:    THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.

     WRIT NOT CONSIDERED.     The writ application fails to comply
with Rule 4-5 (C) (10) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of
Appeal, as it does not include a copy of the pertinent court
minutes.   Further, the district court's ruling on Defendant's
evidentiary objection contained in his reply memorandum is not
clear from the writ application.       See La. C~de Civ. P. art.
966(0)(2).

     Supplementation   of  this   writ   application   and/or   an
application for rehearing will not be considered.    Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9.

     In the    event relator seeks to file a new application with
this court,    it must contain all pertinent documentation and must
comply with    Rule 2-12.2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts
of Appeal.       Any new application must be filed on or before
February 16,    2023 and must contain a copy of this ruling.

                                   MRT
                                   WRC

     Hester,      dissents and would issue
                J. ,                           a    briefing   schedule
pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(H).

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

    DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
        FOR THE COURT