Court Opinion

ID: 9735822
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 18:31:57.741146+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:27:01.853633
License: Public Domain

Griffin, J.
(concurring). For the reasons set forth therein, I continue to believe that Stein v Southeastern Michigan Family Project, Inc, 432 Mich 198; 438 NW2d 76 (1989) (Griffin, J., dissenting), was wrongly decided. However, in light of the position taken in Stein by a majority of the Court, I believe it would be of practical benefit now to the bench and bar to amend MCR 2.111(F)(3)(a) as proposed. Accordingly, I concur in adoption of the rule change which, as I read it, will be applied to pleadings filed after its effective date.