Court Opinion

ID: 2687607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-31 21:42:37.195087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:49.203829
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                     No. 12-1488
                                 Filed July 30, 2014

STATE OF IOWA,
     Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRIAN MICHAEL KENNEDY,
     Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Michael G.

Dieterich, District Associate Judge.

      Brian Kennedy appeals his conviction for driving while revoked.

AFFIRMED.

      R. A. Bartolomei of Bartolomei & Lange, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kyle P. Hanson, Assistant Attorney

General, Patrick C. Jackson, County Attorney, and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant

County Attorney, for appellee.

      Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Tabor and Bower, JJ.
                                          2

VAITHESWARAN, P.J.

       Brian Kennedy appeals his conviction for driving while revoked arising

from a stop on June 26, 2011. He contends:

               The district court erred in permitting the admission of the
       certified abstract of driving record and all the attachments including
       affidavits of mail service of the required notices of revocation,
       without requiring the State to produce the attesting witnesses from
       the office of driver services to testify and be subject to cross-
       examination as required under the Confrontation Clause of the
       Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and under
       Article 1, Section 10 of the Iowa Constitution.

Kennedy concedes “the issue in this case is identical to the issue in State v.

Kennedy, Court No. 11-1685,” a separate appeal from a prior driving-while-

revoked conviction.

       The Iowa Supreme Court recently resolved that appeal.           See State v.

Kennedy, 846 N.W.2d 517 (Iowa 2014). The court held the admission of the

certified abstract of Kennedy’s driving record did not violate the Confrontation

Clauses of the United States or Iowa Constitutions. Id. at 525. This holding

controls the disposition of Kennedy’s present appeal, to the extent he challenges

the admission of the certified driving record.

       With respect to Kennedy’s challenge to the admission of affidavits of

mailing, no affidavits were attached to the certified driving record admitted in this

case. Accordingly, we need not address the issue.

       We affirm Kennedy’s judgment and sentence for driving while revoked.

       AFFIRMED.