Court Opinion

ID: 9399105
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-01 21:00:52.092181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:38.869968
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7439      Doc: 12         Filed: 05/31/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7439

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        DAVID HILL,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

        Submitted: May 25, 2023                                           Decided: May 31, 2023

        Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7439      Doc: 12         Filed: 05/31/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               David Hill, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order issuing a prefiling

        injunction in his criminal proceeding. Upon review of the record in conjunction with the

        arguments pressed on appeal, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in

        issuing the injunction. See Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817-18 (4th

        Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review and providing four-factor test). Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D.

        Va. Nov. 30, 2022).      We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2