Court Opinion

ID: 1006261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:08:55.056309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:44.980662
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Leroy Ragin appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to
   
   *350
   
  dismiss his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S .C. § 2241 (1994) or alternatively, his motion filed pursuant to 28 U .S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Ragin’s motion to file a supplemental brief, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Ragin v. Warden, Federal Corr. Inst.,
  
  Nos. CR-90-25-P; CA-99-367-3-4MU (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 30, 2001, entered May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.