Court Opinion

ID: 9553423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:29:26.333032+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:31:05.234266
License: Public Domain

GUTHRIE, C. J.,
concurs in the result.
ORDER
The court having examined the application for rehearing heretofore filed herein by appellant, and being fully advised,
It is ordered that the said application be and the same is hereby denied.
McCLINTOCK, J., not participating.
ROSE, J., wishes the record to reflect that he did not sit on the original case or participate in the decision-making process and therefore expresses no opinion as to the result reached.
However, in examining the record, the opinion, and the grounds relied upon in the petition for rehearing, he applies the Wyoming Supreme Court rule applicable to such matters as expressed and employed traditionally in this court. See Town of Glenrock v. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co., 73 Wyo. 385, 279 P.2d 894, 281 P.2d 455.
The rule is that where the only reason advanced for a rehearing is simply reargument and repetition of counsel’s views which have already received consideration, the Supreme Court will not grant a rehearing.
He finds no new facts or propositions of law relied upon in the petition for rehearing which were not originally considered by the Supreme Court in the case on appeal and therefore, for this reason and only for this reason, would deny the petition for rehearing.