Court Opinion

ID: 799722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-05-11 15:12:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:30.331532
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

IN RE MIKE O’DONNELL and ANDREW CAMERON
              ____________________

                      2011-1610
                (Serial No. 09/245,798)
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   TIMOTHY E. SIEGEL, Timothy E. Siegel Patent Law,
PLLC, of Bellevue, Washington, argued for appellants.

    FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of
the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on
the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and JOSEPH G.
PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor.

                ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit
Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 11, 2012                /s/ Jan Horbaly
    Date                         Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk