Court Opinion

ID: 9780024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 01:11:47.491393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:51.870983
License: Public Domain

SHEPHERD, J.,
concurring.
I join.in the decision of the court on the sole ground the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to examine the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the procedure employed by the police gave rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable mis-identification. See State v. Parker, 991 So.2d 411, 414-15 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“[E]ven if we were to find that the identification procedure employed by law enforcement was unnecessarily suggestive in the instant case, we would be required to grant the State’s petition, as the trial court failed to perform the two-part test in determining whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the suggestion procedure gave rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”).