Court Opinion

ID: 8678736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:50:14.654137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.473138
License: Public Domain

*219Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders construing his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.