Court Opinion

ID: 6946003
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:25:41.497311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:54.902415
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of one count of assaulting a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, and one count of resisting arrest, ORS 162.315. He received an upward departure sentence of 18 months on the conviction for assaulting a public safety officer, based on a finding of persistent involvement in similar offenses. On appeal, defendant argues that the imposition of the departure sentence violated the rule of law, announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), that sentencing departure factors other than the fact of a prior conviction or facts admitted by the defendant must be found by the jury. Although defendant did not preserve his challenge, we have held that such error is apparent on the face of the record. State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005). For the reason set forth in Perez, we exercise our discretion to correct the error.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.