Court Opinion

ID: 9825914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 14:19:45.807595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:29.105689
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing Bobins, J., on rehearing.' In its petition for rehearing appellee insists that our direction for modification of its certificate of authority so as to require some rail movement on all traffic handled by it is erroneous. On the record before us we conclude that our order was proper; but, as this particular phase of the matter may not have been fully developed in the hearing before the Commission, we amend our former order so as to permit appellee, if it be so advised, to apply, in the regular manner, to the Commission for another hearing as to the propriety of the requirement for part rail haul as fixed by us, and to permit the Commission, should it find such order fair to all concerned and in the public interest, to amend or eliminate the requirement that all traffic handled by appellee have some rail haul; any such order, of course, to be subject to appeal in the manner provided by statute.