Court Opinion

ID: 988993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:00:27.657668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:13.293016
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7927

ROBERT LEE BROCK,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Judge,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter E. Hoffman, Senior District
Judge. (CA-95-40-2-MC)

Submitted:   March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

attempt to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Smith,
No. CA-95-40-2-MC (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2