Court Opinion

ID: 2850417
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 22:31:40.270281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:51.095693
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH 

NO. 2-05-459-CV

ETTARENE SESSION	APPELLANT

V.

FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT	APPELLEES

SCHOOL DISTRICT, CECELIA SPEER,

AND LOESTER POSEY

----------

FROM THE 48
TH
 DISTRICT 
COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM
 
OPINION
(footnote: 1) 
AND JUDGMENT

----------

On March 7, 2006, we notified appellant Ettarene Session that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by T
EX.
 R. A
PP.
 P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.  

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. 
  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  
See T
EX
. R. A
PP
. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the 
appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM 			

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 30, 2006

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4
.