Court Opinion

ID: 4386015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-11 07:44:14.810729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:33.397853
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,285-02

                    EX PARTE DARRYL EARL DANIELS, JR., Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                CAUSE NO. 114-0391-13-C IN THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT
                                FROM SMITH COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals dismissed his

appeal. Daniels v. State, No. 12-15-00023-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler Feb. 11, 2015) (not designated for

publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to an appeal. We

remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court

has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find that Applicant is
                                                                                                        2

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in cause

number114-0391-13 from the 114th District Court of Smith County. Applicant is ordered returned

to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of

counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court

shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct

appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which

the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he

must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

        Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered:       April 10, 2019

Do not publish