Court Opinion

ID: 2715418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-06 17:23:38.179407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:10:51.004931
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
                                     DIVISION ONE

                                                                                     _3       o> <-i
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
                                                   No. 70319-6-1                      5        •£"
                       Respondent,

                  v.                               UNPUBLISHED OPINION                    ^

DWIGHT LLOYD CASADY,
                                                                                              123 Wash. 2d 296, 306, 868 P.2d 835,

870 P.2d 964 (1994) (defendant does not have a constitutional right to be present

during in-chambers or bench conferences between the court and counsel on legal

matters, at least where those matters "do not require a resolution of disputed facts");

State v. Miller,    Wn. App.     , 316P.3d 1143, 1150(2014). He thus fails to

demonstrate any basis for review or relief.

       Finally Casady's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are either too

conclusory to merit discussion, RAP 10.10(c) (appellate court will not consider
additional grounds for review that do not adequately inform the court of the nature of the
alleged errors), or involve matters outside the record.

               Affirmed.

                            FOR THE COURT:

                                                              All