Court Opinion

ID: 6639889
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:44:36.551076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:59:12.138579
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
— Suit to recover an undivided one-third interest in certain premises, and to be let into possession as a tenant in common with the defendant. Trial by court. Findings and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a’new trial.
There is no certificate contained in the record, nor does it otherwise appear, that the statement on motion for a new trial contains all the evidence had upon the trial. We are therefore precluded from making an examination into the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to justify the findings of the court. (State v. Shepphard, 23 Mont. 323, 58 Pac. 868.) This disposes of all of plaintiff’s specifications of error, except the last, wherein he specifies that the court erred in its conclusions of law deduced from the findings of adverse possession. While we doubt whether this contention has merit in it under the findings that were made, we will not examine into that question; for plaintiff failed to point out the particular defects — if any there were — in the findings made by the court, and to save his exceptions, as required by the Code. (Section 1114, Code of Civil Procedure; Haggin v. Saile, 23 Mont. 375, 59 Pac. 154; Gallagher v. Cornelius, 23 Mont. 27, 57 Pac. 447.)
Under the prevalent doctrine of implied findings, the judgment appealed from will not be reversed unless requests and exceptions were made and saved. { Vide above authorities.)
We find no error. Judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Afirmed.