Court Opinion

ID: 680339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:34:45+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:33.968594
License: Public Domain

37 F.3d 1496NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.David A. JAMES, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6736.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CR-88-437-JFM)
David A. James, appellant pro se.
Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's request for transcripts.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. James, No. CR-88-437-JFM (D. Md. June 15, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.