Court Opinion

ID: 1006670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:30.012837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:14.262645
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-7887

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES WILLIAM BEASLEY, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-97-988, CA-01-3516-7-20)

Submitted:   January 31, 2002            Decided:   February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James William Beasley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.    Elizabeth Jean
Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James William Beasley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See United States v. Beasley, Nos.

CR-97-988; CA-01-3516-7-20 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2001).     We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2