Court Opinion

ID: 9826923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 16:59:10.831653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:19.413193
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
We quote as follows from appellees’ motion ' on rehearing, “Therefore, inasmuch as there may arise some doubt either on the part of the Supreme Court or on the part of counsel for appellant as to what this Honorable Court has really found and held in this respect, that is, as to whether it holds there is no evidence to require the submission to the jury of the issue of negligence, or whether it has found and held that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we urgently request that in your ruling on this application for rehearing you make it clear and definite that you have held that ‘there was no evidence to go to the jury, that is, no substantial evidence requiring that the issue of negligence be submitted to the jury’, if that be your holding, as we understand it is from a very careful reading of the opinion”; in compliance with this request we expressly find “there was no evidence to go to the jury, that is, no substantial evidence requiring that the issue of negligence be submitted.”
The motion for rehearing is in all things overruled.