Court Opinion

ID: 1003452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:26:32.113822+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:18.706367
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LAMONT L. FLEMING, a/k/a Marty,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-95-41-H, CA-98-178-4-H)

Submitted:   January 18, 2001             Decided:   January 24, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont L. Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lamont L. Fleming seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Fleming, Nos. CR-95-41-H; CA-

98-178-4-H (E.D.N.C. July 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2