Court Opinion

ID: 9668361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 02:10:28.668729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:44.875542
License: Public Domain

VANDE WALLE, Justice,
concurring in the result.
I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion and with most of the rationale used to arrive at that result. I write separately only to note that I adhere to my position in Mandan Sec. Bank v. Heinsohn, 320 N.W.2d 494, 501 (N.D.1982) (VandeWalle, J., dissenting), i.e., that after having executed a note and mortgage as partners, the individual partners cannot be proceeded against on the basis of their individual guaranties under our antidefici-ency statutes. Therefore, I believe that not only is Mandan Sec. Bank v. Heinsohn distinguishable, I believe it was wrongly decided and should be reversed when an appropriate case involving a partnership is before us.
MESCHKE, J., concurs.