Court Opinion

ID: 9624068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 06:49:55.731676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:05:38.418758
License: Public Domain

NELSON, District Judge
(concurring in the result).
I do not subscribe to all that Mr. Chief Justice McDONOUGH has said on the subject of inference, nor do I agree with the conclusion that he apparently has reached on that subject.
I do agree, however, that under the evidence received in this case, the defendant’s negligence or lack of negligence was properly a question of fact for the jury, as were the questions relating to damages.
I concur in the decision, “The judgment upon the directed verdict is set aside and the judgment upon the jury verdict is reinstated. Costs to appellant.”