Court Opinion

ID: 1367884
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:49:17.504033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:20.343478
License: Public Domain

475 P.2d 92 (1970)
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Donnie Ray GARDNER, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.
Argued and Submitted September 28, 1970.
Decided October 2, 1970.
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
*93 Jacob B. Tanzer, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and BRANCHFIELD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a plea of guilty. Having originally plead not guilty, defendant went to trial before a jury on a charge of burglary not in a dwelling. He was represented by counsel. After hearing the evidence against him he withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty. He now argues that the court should not have permitted him to so do.
On appeal from a judgment entered on a plea of guilty:
"* * * [T]he appellate court shall only consider the question whether an excessive fine or excessive, cruel or unusual punishment not proportionate to the offense has been imposed * * *." ORS 138.050.
See State v. Brudos, Or. App., 90 Adv.Sh. 1813, 471 P.2d 861 (1970).
Affirmed.