Court Opinion

ID: 4265712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-20 00:00:22.11599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:30:53.050896
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10975      Document: 00514438626         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/19/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-10975                             FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                       April 19, 2018
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FREDDY CANTU, JR.,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:05-CR-44-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Freddy Cantu, Jr.,
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cantu has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
Cantu’s response.       We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10975   Document: 00514438626    Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/19/2018

                               No. 17-10975

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                    2