Court Opinion

ID: 5109587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 12:45:29.032358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:27.444961
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
L.R. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to A.D.R. and C.L.R. (“Children”). We find that the *488trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mother’s motion to continue. We also find that the trial court did not err in finding statutory grounds for termination existed under section 211.447.5(6) RSMo Supp.2011. Finally, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that termination was in the best interests of Children.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).