Court Opinion

ID: 9562299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 18:25:58.346393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:17.342287
License: Public Domain

Goolsby, Judge
(concurring):
I agree with the majority that the trial court did not err in holding Douglas Cowart’s twenty-year employment contract void as a matter of public policy. I would base this decision, however, on the fact that the contract was not of a reasonable duration. See 63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 979(b) (1950) (unless the term of a municipal contract is restricted by statute or other mandate, the term of the contract is limited to a reasonable duration). I would therefore not reach the issue of whether a council of a municipal corporation that is in perpetual succession has the authority to contractually bind its successors.