Court Opinion

ID: 9705953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 01:27:40.163612+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:17.843840
License: Public Domain

ROGOSHESKE, Justice
(dissenting).
While I disagree with the district court’s conclusion that Rule 28 is constitutionally impermissible and its refusal to review the merits of the county court’s dismissal of the misdemeanor charge, I find no proper justification for addressing the basis for the district court’s conclusion, upon a theory neither espoused nor supported by either party before that court, and further in view of subsequent legislative enactments. In my opinion, we should dismiss the appeal to this court as improvidently granted. The effect would be to reinstate the county court’s dismissal of the misdemeanor charge on the ground that defendant was denied a speedy trial, a disposition surely compelled by this record.