Court Opinion

ID: 6564036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:18:11.792256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:39.231624
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Bailey
delivered the opinion of the court:
This action was brought by defendants in error from the district court of Montrose county, against Paul Gehr and others. While the action was pending, Paul Gehr died, and steps were taken to substitute plaintiff in error in place of deceased. Plaintiff in error did not enter his appearance in the court below.
On January 18, 1902, a decree was rendered against plaintiff in error by the judge at chambers in Delta county. In this decree the taking of evidence is recited. Certain matters of fact are found and determined and judgment rendered against plaintiff in error in the sum of $2,396.00 and costs, and the decree provides: “That the said judgment is allowed as a fourth-class claim, and the adminis*230trator is ordered to pay tlie same pro rata the same •as all other claims of the fourth class.”
This judgment cannot stand. In default cases where testimony is taken, it must be by the court or referee.: — Section 168, Code of Civil Proc.
The judge in chambers in Delta county, cannot take testimony and render a. judgment which should be done by the court in Montrose county.
The decree is also erroneous in providing that the judgment should be allowed as a fourth-class claim. This was a usurpation of the province of-the county court. — Section 4793, Mills’ Ann. Stats.
We do not deem it necessary to pass upon the other errors assigned in this case. •
For the reasons above stated, the judgment will be reversed. Reversed.
Chief Justice Gabbert and Mr. Justice Gunter concur.