Court Opinion

ID: 9904967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-28 16:01:20.986234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:05.593762
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1882
                        ___________________________

                              Md Shakhawat Hossain

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                           Job Service of North Dakota

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the District of North Dakota - Western
                                   ____________

                          Submitted: November 15, 2023
                            Filed: November 28, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Md Hossain appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the

      1
       The Honorable Clare R. Hochhalter, United States Magistrate Judge for the
District of North Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
parties’ arguments, we conclude Hossain did not preserve for appeal his argument
that the district court erred in failing to rule on his motion to amend. See Becker v.
Univ. of Neb. at Omaha, 191 F.3d 904, 909 n.4 (8th Cir. 1999) (declining to address
argument plaintiff failed to preserve for appeal). We also conclude that the grant of
summary judgment was proper. See Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th
Cir. 2022) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                         ______________________________

                                         -2-