Court Opinion

ID: 3227807
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:04:02.388852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:08.130980
License: Public Domain

Appellant brought this suit against the appellees as guarantors for the performance of a certain written contract entered into between appellant and one William W. McNeil.
As a defense to the suit defendants interposed plea "A", which appears in the report of the case. This plea was rested upon the fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of the principal obligor. But the plea fails to aver that plaintiff, the guarantee, participated in or had any knowledge of any such alleged fraudulent representations.
Apt grounds of demurrer take the point, and under the decisions of this court (J. R. Watkins Medicine Co. v. Hargett,209 Ala. 165, 95 So. 811; Furst  Thomas v. Sandlin, 208 Ala. 490,94 So. 740; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Daniel, 228 Ala. 399,153 So. 771) in harmony with the current of authority elsewhere (71 A.L.R. 1278 et seq.; 28 C. J. 927) the demurrer was due to be sustained.
The action of the court in overruling the demurrer to plea "A" superinduced the nonsuit and was error to reverse. In view of that conclusion a consideration of the ruling on plaintiff's replication becomes unnecessary.
For the error indicated let the judgment stand reversed.
Reversed and remanded.
BOULDIN, FOSTER, and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.