Court Opinion

ID: 998082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:05:58.965586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:07.494531
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DARRYL JAMES MCGLAMRY,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-88-136-G, CA-97-632-2)

Submitted:   February 25, 1999              Decided:   March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl James McGlamry, Appellant Pro Se.       David Bernard Smith,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Darryl James McGlamry seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. McGlamry, Nos. CR-88-136-

G; CA-97-632-2 (M.D.N.C. June 16, 1998).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2