Court Opinion

ID: 9793173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:43:57.212568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:32.465930
License: Public Domain

PETERSON, J.,
specially concurring.
I agree with the foregoing opinion with this caveat: The theory of recovery pleaded in this case was that the Alhadeffs were negligent in selling liquor to Miller and Kolibaba. Analysis of a potential civil tort action based upon some other theory is unnecessary to the result. I therefore question the necessity, in this negligence case, of discussing the application of a theory of recovery based upon Restatement (Second) of The Law of Torts § 874A, relative to the statements contained on pages 277-279 of the opinion discussing such potential civil tort action.