Court Opinion

ID: 51871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:09:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:10.407770
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                                                     F I L E D
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             August 21, 2007
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                         Clerk
                               No. 06-41114
                            Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TERRICK ANTONY JOHNSON

                                         Defendant-Appellant

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Eastern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 5:05-CR-2-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
     The attorney appointed to represent Terrick Antony Johnson has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).   Johnson has not filed a response.        Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 06-41114

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                   2