Court Opinion

ID: 8479776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 16:43:47.122591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.219474
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Leonard Olszowy and Anna Olszowy seek to appeal the district court’s order adopting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss the Olszowys’ claims against all but two Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 *308U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Olszow-ys’ seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.