Court Opinion

ID: 8416183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:15:15.897599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:15.930149
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Demetric Gray Pearson seeks to appeal a district court order requiring him to assist the court in effecting service of process. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 *224(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Pearson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.