Court Opinion

ID: 2858264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 18:58:49.13165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:49.673906
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

AT AUSTIN

 

NO. 3-92-597-CR

BOBBY JOE WALKER,

	APPELLANT

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

	APPELLEE

 

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 92-077, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING
 

PER CURIAM
	After accepting appellant's plea of no contest and hearing his judicial confession,
the district court found him guilty of possessing less than 28 grams of cocaine with intent to
deliver.  Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 1992).  The court assessed
punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for forty-five years.
	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why
there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988);
Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553

(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to
appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro
se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal
is frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

[Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith]
Affirmed
Filed:   April 7, 1993
[Do Not Publish]