Court Opinion

ID: 3212245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-11 03:16:23.731766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:45:57.558546
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-84,925-01

                            EX PARTE FELIX ESTRADA, Applicant

                ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
              CAUSE NO. CR-2928-14-A (1) IN THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

kidnapping and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends that his guilty plea was involuntary. He states that trial counsel induced

his guilty plea when counsel “informed [A]pplicant that, in exchange for his guilty plea, the State’s

attorney would recommend an 8-year sentence and the judge could release him on ‘shock’ probation

in 6 months,” but Applicant was not eligible for “shock” probation. According to Applicant, “Based

upon that representation, Applicant consented to plead guilty and accept the terms of the State’s

plea-bargain offer.”
                                                                                                         2

          Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. See Ex Parte

Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these circumstances, additional facts are

needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial

court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond

to Applicant’s claim that his plea was involuntary based on counsel’s advice regarding “shock”

probation. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

          If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

          The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of

law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus

relief.

          This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 8, 2016
Do not publish