Court Opinion

ID: 1003950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:34:06.339604+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.607178
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HENRY ANDRE REDFERN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-98-567, CA-00-1335-17-0)

Submitted:   March 22, 2001                 Decided:   March 29, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Andre Redfern, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Henry Andre Redfern seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Redfern, Nos. CR-98-567; CA-

00-1335-17-0   (D.S.C.   Oct.   11,   2000).     We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                 DISMISSED

                                      2