Court Opinion

ID: 8652391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 20:59:42.170462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:35.353696
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Paul Crawford appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court’s judicial fact findings in support of the revocation sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. As Crawford acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 545, 166 L.Ed.2d 403 (2006).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.