Court Opinion

ID: 5152751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 02:04:05.29842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:53:24.852146
License: Public Domain

ORDER ¶ 1 On de novo examination of the paperwork on file and of the transcript and record *Page 856 
of proceedings before the Professional Responsibility Tribunal's assigned trial panel, the court finds that the applicant established by clear and convincing proof that:
 ¶ 2 (1) he is a person of ethical fitness,
 ¶ 3 (2) he has not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law since 8 September 2003, when his name was stricken from the Roll of Attorneys for noncompliance with mandatory continuing legal education requirements and for non-payment of dues, and
 ¶ 4 (3) the applicant has completed the Professional Responsibility Tribunal's recommended hours of continuing legal education and is sufficiently abreast of intervening changes in the law to qualify for reinstatement without examination.
 ¶ 5 The applicant's license to practice law in the State of Oklahoma shall stand reinstated upon payment of the assessed costs of this proceeding in the sum of $727.51.
 ¶ 6 WATT, C.J., WINCHESTER, V.C.J. and LAVENDER, OPALA, KAUGER, EDMONDSON, TAYLOR and COLBERT, JJ., concur.
 ¶ 7 HARGRAVE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.