Court Opinion

ID: 747485
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 23:00:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:34.499249
License: Public Domain

127 F.3d 1107
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Francisco RANGEL-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-30053.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 1997.**Decided Oct. 24, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding
Before:  THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Francisco Rangel-Navarro appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation for an aggravated felony.  His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

3
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3