Court Opinion

ID: 4448862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-22 19:00:18.535062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:20.224656
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-7219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

QUANTAVIUS DURHAM, Quan,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:15-cr-00080-RGD-LRL-1)

Submitted: October 17, 2019                                   Decided: October 22, 2019

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quantavius Durham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Quantavius Durham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Durham, No. 4:15-cr-00080-RGD-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2019). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2