Court Opinion

ID: 9443925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:34:09.626531+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:38.964532
License: Public Domain

*341ALLEN, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
I regret that I cannot agree with the judgment of reversal entered by my colleagues. In Lexington, Kentucky, where ■one of the stolen cars was recovered, Camilla was seen around September 1,1951, in company with Coneiello, who had been indicted jointly with Camilla. At the time when Coneiello was seen with Camilla in Lexington Coneiello was engaged in selling one of the stolen cars. The other stolen car was found in Fay-ette County, Kentucky, September 8, 1951, having been abandoned with the keys in it. It contained certain latent fingerprints, eight of which were stipulated by counsel to be those of Camilla. These fingerprints were on the rear view mirror. The above testimony unexplained was sufficient to require the submission of the case to the jury, which found Camilla guilty.
Its verdict and the judgment based thereon should not be set aside.