Court Opinion

ID: 990581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:23:32.955438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:45.046709
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-2746

WILLIE WALLACE,

                                                         Petitioner,

          versus

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

                                                        Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(95-779-BLA)

Submitted:   September 30, 1996           Decided:   October 9, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Wallace, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN,
STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Jeffrey Steven
Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Wallace v.
Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 95-779-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2