Court Opinion

ID: 4910880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-14 19:01:33.353584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:21.612032
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 21-6915

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff - Appellee,

              v.

KACEY HICKS, a/k/a Casey Hicks,

                     Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00279-BO-1)

Submitted: September 9, 2021                                Decided: September 14, 2021

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kacey Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney,
Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Kacey Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse

of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining

steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED

                                            2