Court Opinion

ID: 8030215
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:04:51.825035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.778833
License: Public Domain

On September 8, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Sexual Assault on a Minor, a felony. The sentence shall run consecutively to the sentence in Cause No. DC-06-19. The Defendant shall complete sex offender Phases I and II while in prison.
On August 2, 2007, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was represented by John Petak.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Done in open Court this 2nd day of August, 2007.
DATED this 14th day of August, 2007.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Chairperson, Hon. Randal Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler.