Court Opinion

ID: 1010329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:10:08.839526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:01.417900
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 03-6300

HENRY LEE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
4203-MJG)

Submitted:   April 17, 2003                 Decided:   April 24, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Henry Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.    See Lee v. Warden, No. CA-

02-4203-MJG (D. Md. filed Jan. 6, 2003 & entered Jan. 7, 2003).   We

deny Lee’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2