Court Opinion

ID: 4134500
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 01:51:02.994265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:18.514000
License: Public Domain

AUSTIN.      ‘l%XAS     78711

                                        December 5, 1961

Hon. Neal Birmingham                             Opinion No,. M-l 67
Criminal District Attorney
Cass County                                      Re: Whether the County Tax Assessor-Collector
Linden, Texas 75563                                  is required by Article 2549, Vernon’s Civil
                                                     Statutes, or other law, to deposit tax funds
                                                     in his possession in the designated county
                                                     depository pending transfer of the funds to
                                                     the County Treasurer, and related ques-
Dear Sir:                                            tions.

               By recent letter to this office you have requested an opinion in regard to the
above stated matter. Specifically you have asked the following questions:

                “(1) Is the County Tax AssessorCollector required by Article 2549
        V.A.C.S. or other authority to deposit tax funds in his possession in the des-
        ignated county depository pending transfer of such funds to the Treasurer?

                “(2) If so, how often is the Tax Collector legally required to make de-
        posits? (Does ‘as soon as collected’ mean simultaneous with the transaction,
        hourly, twice a day, daily, weekly, bi-monthly or how often)?

                 “(3) Assuming an affirmutrve answer to the first question, what action,
        if any, could be taken against the Tax Collector if he willfully deposited funds
        in an unofficial depository, providing that the funds were available and de-
        livered to the County Treasurer at the time required by law?

                “(4) Assuming that some action could be taken, who would be autho-
        rized to institute such action? (The official depository, the Commissioners
        Court, the County, the State of Texas, or some other person or body)

               “(5) Assuming all answers to the preceding questions to be unfavorable
        to the Tax Collector’s position, does the Tax Collector have any remedy to re-
        duce his risk or expense in being required by law to transport such funds?”

                 In addition, you have stated in your letter that the Commissioners Court, in its
discretion, refuses to require the county depository, which is located in the same county, but in a
different town from the county seat, to file the statement designating the place and person at the

                                              -803-
  .

Hon. Neal Birmingham, page 2, (M-167)

county seat where deposits may be received on behalf of the county under Article 2553, Ver-
non’s Civil Statutes.

               The pertinent   part of Article 2549, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, reads as follows:

               “      It shall also be the duty of the tax collector of such county to de-
       posit all taxes collected by him, or under his authority, for the State and such
       county and its various districts and other municipal subdivisions, in such de-
       pository or depositories, as soon as collected, pending the preparation of his
       report of such collection and settlement thereon. The bond of such county
       depository or depositories shah stand as security for ah such fun&. Upon such
       funds betng deposited as herein required, the tax collector and sureties on his
       bond, shall thereafter be relieved of responsibility of its safekeeping.         .”
       (Emphasis added.)

                Such statute further provides that such county depositories shall have the duty to
use due diligence and collect all checks, draftqdemands, etc.

               The other statutes concerning county depositories set out elaborate guides for set-
ting the bond of such depository by the Commissioners Court and indicates that the Legislature
intended the money to be covered either under the Treasurer’s bond or the county depository’s
bond.

              Article 7295, Vernon‘s Civil St;ltutes, sets out the duty of the tax collector in
paymg over public moneys to the County Treasurer It reads as follows:

                “All tax coltectors and other officers or appointees authorized to re-
       ceive public moneys shall account for all moneys in their hands belonging to
       their respective counties, cities or towns, and pay the same over to the re-
       speCtive county treasurers or city treasurers whenever and as often as they may
       be directed to do so by the respective county judges, or county commissioners
       courts or mayor or board of aldermen; provided that tax collectors shall have
       ten days from the date of such direction within which to comply with the
       same,,” (Emphasis added.)

                 Article 7249a, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, designates weekly payments to be made by
the tax collector to the County and State Treasurers. It reads as follows:

                “On Monday of each week each County Tax Collector shall pay over
        to the County Treasurer ninety per cent (90%) of all taxes collected for the
        County during the preceding week, and pay over to the State Treasurer ninety
        per cent (90%) of all taxes collected for the State during the preceding week.

                                               -804.
/    .     -     -

    Hon. Neal Birmingham, page 3, (M-167)

                   “The Commissioners’Court of any Countv, or the Comptroller of F’ub-
           lit Accounts, nzay at any time in their descretion call upon the Tax Collector
           for a sworn statement as to the amount of his collections made during the
           current month, and for a report as to the amount of taxes in the County De-
           pository belonging to the County or State, and direct that ninety per cent
           (90%) of those funds be transferred to the County or State Treasury. The Com-
           missioners’ Court or the Comptroller may at any time require a sworn report
           from the Depository as to the amount of funds in their hands under the control
           of the Tax Collector. Failure or refusal of a Tax CoNector to make the remtt-
           tances as provided in this Act within three (3) days from the date due, or to
           render the statements required herein, within three (3) days after receiving
           notice to do so, shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine
           not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.001. ” (Emphasis added.)

                    Article 2554, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, provides for the payment of county war-
    rants and provides, in part:

                     ‘I
                       It shall be the duty of such depository to make a detailed monthly
           statement to the Commissioners Court at each regular term of said Court show-
           ing the daily balances to the credit of each of the funds on deposit.       .”
           (Emphasis added.)

                    It is apparent from reading all of these statutes, which are in para materia, that
    the Legislature intended that tax collections be placed on deposit at least on a weekly basis to be
    available for the County Treasurer to pay such bills as may be presented. Both the county depos-
    itory and the tax collector is required to make monthly reports to the Commissioners Court. The
    language in Art. 2549 can only be reasonably construed as meaning as soon as possible and not
    less than weekly, and in contemplation of the tax collector’s monthly report. It is apparent,
    because of the bonding requirements, that such funds were intended to be protected under the
    bond of either the tax collector or the county depository. Such funds are required to be in the
    physical possession of either one or the other.

                     The answer to Question No. 1, therefore, is that the County Tax Assessor-Col-
    lector is required by Art 2549, and the other cited statutes, which are in para materia tHere-
    with, to deposit tax funds in his possession in the county depository pending transfer of the
    funds to the County Treasurer

                   The answer to Question No. 2 is that the tax collector is legally required to make
    such deposits in the county depository at least on a weekly basis, pursuant to Article 7249a

                    The answer to Question No. 3 is that action can be taken agaivst the tax collector
    under such circumstances as you describe, either under the penal provisions of Article 7249a or
    under the provisions of Article 7295.
                                                   -805-
.   .

    Hon. Neal Birmingham, page 4, (M-167)

                    The answer to Question No. 4 is that the Commissioners Court is authorrzed to
    bring a suit in court, under either of the above two cited Articles, and the District or County
    Attorney, under those Articles and other appropriate law, and in some instances the County
    Treasurer or Auditor, have the authority to bring such a suit. Attorney General’s Opinion Non,
    6929 (I 945).

                     In answer to Question No. 5, you are advised that the tax collector may, under
    appropriate procedures, request that the Commissioners Court raise the amount of his bond due
    to the additional risk involved in transporting such funds to the county depository.

                                          SUMMARY

                    The County Tax Assessor-Collector is required by Article 2549, V.C.S.,
           and other appropriate law, to deposit tax funds in his possession in the designa-
           ted county depository, pending transfer of the funds to the County Treasurer.
           The tax collector is required to make such deposits to the county depository
           at least weekly by Article 7249a, V C.S The Commissioners Court, County. or
           District Attorney, and in some cases other county ofticials, have standing to
           bring suit to require the tax collector to deposit collections timely in the
           county depository. Article 7249a, V.C.S.; Article 7295, V.C.S~

    Prepared by Pat Cain
    Assistant Attorney General

    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
    Kerns Taylor, Co-Chairman
    W. V Geppert              ,, , _.
    W. 0, Shultz       ’      *;;:
    Edward Esquivel
    John Fainter

    A., J. CARUBBI, JR.
    Staff Legal Assistant

                                                  -806-