Court Opinion

ID: 997800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:02:02.544546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:38.747433
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7250

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTHONY WILLIAMSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-94-37, CA-97-405-R)

Submitted:   January 21, 1999             Decided:   February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Harold Jenkins, Jr., MOLININI, JENKINS & DAMMAR, Bronx, New
York, for Appellant.    Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United
States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Anthony Williamson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Williamson, Nos. CR-

94-37; CA-97-405-R (W.D. Va. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2