Court Opinion

ID: 9826167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 15:27:53.40966+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:54.656722
License: Public Domain

Mr.- Justice Woods.
I concur, and think this remark should be made in addition to> the reasons for affirmance stated by Mr. Justice Jones. There was evidence that the stations, including Ridge Spring, w-ere called in the usual way, and there was no evidence whatever to the contrary. It is not, therefore, to be presumed that the jury found a verdict on an issue erroneously submitted to them- not only unsupported by any evidence but opposed toi all the evidence on the subject. The presumption is that they found against the defendant bn the allegation which plaintiff offered positive evidence to sup-port, namely: that she,was misled by a special -call or direction of the conductor or brakeman to her to get off -before she reached her destination.