Court Opinion

ID: 1006212
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:07:51.346014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:44.595495
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6665

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AUDLEY CASANOVA, a/k/a Robert King,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-95-108, CA-99-1100-1)

Submitted:   December 20, 2001         Decided:     December 27, 2001

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Audley Casanova, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Audley Casanova seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Casanova, Nos. CR-95-108; CA-99-1100-1

(M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 21, 2001, entered Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2