Court Opinion

ID: 2925887
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:28:41.286797+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:16.063275
License: Public Domain

NUMBERS 13-08-00046-CR, 

13-08-00047-CR, 13-08-00048-CR, & 13-08-00049-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

_________________________________________________________

KATHERINE RODRIGUEZ,	APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	APPELLEE.
________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 347th District Court 
of Nueces County, Texas.
________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	In cause numbers 13-08-00046-CR and 13-08-00048-CR, appellant, Katherine
Rodriguez, attempts to appeal her convictions for forgery.  In cause number 13-08-00047-CR, appellant attempts to appeal her conviction for tampering with a governmental record. 
In cause number 13-08-00049-CR, she attempts to appeal her conviction for fraudulent
use or possession of identifying information.  In each of these cases, the trial court has
certified that "the defendant has waived the right of appeal."  See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(a)(2).
	On January 22, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's
certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the records; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal in these cases; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter,
counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise
this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.
	On February 6, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel's response
does not establish:  (1) that the certifications currently on file with this Court are incorrect,
or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.  
	The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.  Accordingly, these appeals
are DISMISSED.  Any pending motions are likewise DISMISSED.

							PER CURIAM
Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered 
and filed this the 21st day of February, 2008.