Court Opinion

ID: 8784016
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 13:28:04.460963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:58.954991
License: Public Domain

PRATT, District Judge.
Every exception filed by the defendant to the master’s reports, which attacks his integrity and conduct in connection with the hearings, was expressly disavowed when the matter came before me on argument, and must be stricken from the record. The clerk will promptly attend to this matter, and, if in doubt as to his dealing with any paragraph or portion of á paragraph in the ex*1017ceptions, he may ask my advice thereon. I have known the master intimately ever since my term of office began, and am shocked! that counsel could bring themselves to say such things about him, as appear in their exceptions. I should order them off the record, even if upon second thought counsel had not seen fit to disclaim them.
As to the facts with which the master’s reports deal, I learned much about them when the cases were before me on motion for injunction, and) am satisfied that the amount at which he places the damage in each case is substantially right, and I shall accept it as the basis of my finding.
It is assumed that interest on those amounts from 1905 is in the nature of damage, for the detention of payment, and, viewing it in that light, it is clear to me that it ought not to be added. In each case it is the complainant’s fault that he did not receive his just dues sooner. An opportunity was given them when the testimony was first taken in open court, to avail themselves of their equitable rights and go to a master; but they refused the offer. They pushed along in a vain endeavor to obtain an injunction, which was the main form of relief sought. They scouted the alternative remedy and fought persistently for the other up to the Supreme Court and back again. Their action has estopped them from asking or receiving any extra damage for the delay in getting what they might have had long ago.
The same principle applies to the question of costs. They are entitled to exactly their pound of flesh, which is, whatever costs can be properly charged to their effort to obtain the relief which they are now getting. They are certainly not entitled to any costs which have arisen by reason of their wild chase after a rainbow which they never reached. As an operative principle this precludes them from any costs based on their attempt to get injunction relief in this court, or in any other.
The exceptions filed by all parties, so far as they exist after the order to strike out has been enforced, are overruled, and decrees must be entered for the amounts found by the master to be due, with interest from the date of the filing of the reports, with costs taxed in the manner above outlined.