Court Opinion

ID: 2962220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:54:22.542412+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:31.434851
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 10, 1993                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-1537                                   JOSEPH DESFONDS,                                Petitioner, Appellant,                                          v.                            COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,                                Respondent, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                         Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.                                              ______________                                 ____________________            Richard M. Passalacqua on brief for appellant.            ______________________            Scott Harshbarger,  Attorney General, and  Elisabeth J.  Medvedow,            _________________                          ______________________        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  After carefully reviewing the parties'                      __________            briefs  and the  record, we  find that  this appeal  does not            present a substantial question.   See Local Rule 27.1.  As  a                                              ___            result,  the  judgment  of the  district  court  is summarily            affirmed  for  essentially  the  reasons  set  forth  in  its            ________            thorough Memorandum and Order dated April 9, 1993.