Court Opinion

ID: 9450362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 16:43:35.027884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:32:15.909804
License: Public Domain

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I join in the portion of the foregoing opinion which affirms the District Court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in No. 18,640.
I dissent, however, from the majority’s action in No. 18,643 which affirms the District Court’s denial of intervention to Eastern in No. 18,640. I think Eastern should be allowed to intervene in order to protect its interests in the further proceedings in the District Court which will be had in No. 18,640 subsequent to our affirmance of the denial of a preliminary injunction.