Court Opinion

ID: 2991378
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 03:55:48.990923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:42.382039
License: Public Domain

Continuing Abatement Order filed October 13, 2011.

                                          In The

                      Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                      ____________

                                  NO. 14-11-00148-CR

                                      ____________

                      ROGERS HENRY WILLIAMS, Appellant

                                            V.

                           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                       On Appeal from the 208th District Court
                                Harris County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. 1247169

                    CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

       Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Jules L. Laird, Jr. On April 6,
2011, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no motion for extension of
time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the trial court were notified on
April 28, 2011, that no brief had been received. No response from appellant was received.
On May 12, 2011, this court abated the appeal and directed the trial court to determine why
appellant’s brief has not been filed. Appellant then advised this court that he attempted to
contact Jules Laird and was informed by family members that he was no longer practicing
law due to his ill health.        Appellant requested that new counsel be appointed.
Accordingly, on August 11, 2011, this court issued a continuing abatement order directing
the trial court to consider appellant’s request to appoint new counsel. On August 30,
2011, Jules Laird filed an affidavit advising this court that his health is improving and that
he would finalize and file appellant’s brief in thirty days. To date, more than thirty days
have passed and no brief has been filed on behalf of appellant.
       Accordingly, we continue the abatement of this appeal so that the trial court may,
pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (a copy of which is attached) immediately conduct a
hearing, at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, and state’s counsel shall participate, either
in person or by video teleconference, to determine (1) whether appellant desires to
continue the appeal, and if so, (2) whether current counsel will file a brief on behalf of
appellant or whether new counsel must be appointed to ensure effective representation of
counsel; (3) and, determine a date certain when appellant’s brief will be filed. The judge
shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of
law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a transcribed record of the hearing, a
videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video teleconference, and a
supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall
be filed with the clerk of this court on or before October 31, 2011.
       The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
supplemental records are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate
motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on
its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a
hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s
order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall
set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.
                                       PER CURIAM

                                              2
                          RULE 38. REQUISITES OF BRIEFS

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. Failure of Appellant to File Brief.
       (b) Criminal Cases.

              (1) Effect. An appellant=s failure to timely file a brief does not authorize
either dismissal of the appeal or, except as provided in (4), consideration of the appeal
without briefs.

              (2) Notice. If the appellant=s brief is not timely filed, the appellate clerk
must notify counsel for the parties and the trial court of that fact. If the appellate court
does not receive a satisfactory response within ten days, the court must order the trial court
to immediately conduct a hearing to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute
his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether retained counsel
has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations.

              (3) Hearing. In accordance with (2), the trial court must conduct any
necessary hearings, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and have a record of
the proceedings prepared, which recordCincluding any order and findingsCmust be sent to
the appellate court.

              (4) Appellate Court Action. Based on the trial court=s record, the appellate
court may act appropriately to ensure that the appellant=s rights are protected, including
initiating contempt proceedings against appellant=s counsel. If the trial court has found
that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, or that the appellant is not
indigent but has not made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief, the appellate court
may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require.

                                              3