Court Opinion

ID: 9733937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:20:55.879547+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:44.519669
License: Public Domain

TAMILIA, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result. I would join the majority except that I disagree with the manner in which it deals with the issue relating to the discretionary aspects of the sentence. The Commonwealth has not objected to appellant’s raising this issue so I would consider it. Upon review of the sentencing transcript, appellant’s objection to the failure of the court to order a presentence report is without merit, as the information obtained there was adequate for sentencing purposes. The excessiveness of sentence allegation is also *547without merit in light of the facts of this case and the consideration given to that aspect of the case by the sentencing judge. Notwithstanding, any illegality of sentence is corrected by the majority in its disposition of this case.