Court Opinion

ID: 9397696
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-26 00:00:59.48455+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:27.050893
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10398       Document: 00516764216             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/25/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                    ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                     No. 22-10398
                                                                                     FILED
                                                                                 May 25, 2023
                                   Summary Calendar
                                   ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                     Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                           versus

   Oscar Cruz,

                                             Defendant—Appellant.
                    ______________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:21-CR-303-2
                    ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Cruz has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          _____________________
          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
   should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
   forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10398     Document: 00516764216         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/25/2023

                                  No. 22-10398

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2