Court Opinion

ID: 9682534
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 08:12:54.971177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:40.000553
License: Public Domain

ON APPELLANT’S AND APPELLEE’S MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
Appellant and appellee have each filed motions for rehearing. We find that, except as to appellee’s motion to reconsider assessment of court costs, that their motions are without merit. We agree that there has been an improper apportionment of the Court costs.
It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment in this cause be amended, and that appellant, Elwood Cluck and surety, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, pay two-thirds of the costs of the appeal and the appellee, Margaret Cluck, pay one-third of the costs of the appeal.
It is further ordered that appellant’s motion for rehearing and the appellee’s motion for rehearing, with the exception of the court costs, are overruled, and that the judgment of the court heretofore entered be affirmed as amended.