Court Opinion

ID: 4523922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-04-09 15:03:04.001292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:55.802996
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

McCABE’S MECHANICAL SERVICE                  )
INC.,                                        )
                                             )
                    Plaintiff,               )
                                             )
       v.                                    ) C.A. No. 2019-0809-SG
                                             )
SCOTT BALLWEG,                               )
                                             )
                    Defendant.               )

                                       ORDER

      WHEREAS, on February 25, 2020, Plaintiff McCabe’s Mechanical Service

Inc. (“McCabe’s”) filed a Motion to Compel Discovery (the “Motion”) from

Defendant Scott Ballweg;

      WHEREAS, McCabe’s Motion requested that Ballweg be required to retain

a third-party vendor to search his electronically stored information (ESI), including

his emails and personal text messages, and provide results to McCabe’s rather than

accepting Ballweg’s self-production;

      WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, Ballweg opposed the Motion, arguing that

his self-production was adequate and complete, and a third-party vendor was an

unnecessary expense given the scope of the claim;
      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

   1. Defendant shall provide Plaintiff with an affidavit by April 17, 2020,

      affirming under oath that he has responded fully to all relevant document

      requests, including requests for ESI.

   2. If, having received this affidavit, Plaintiff maintains that a third-party vendor

      is necessary, the parties shall confer and agree on an acceptable third-party

      vendor to conduct a search of Defendant’s ESI, with costs associated with

      the third-party vendor born by Plaintiff.

   3. If the third-party vendor’s search of Defendant’s ESI reveals either

      incomplete production or spoliation, then costs associated with the third-

      party vendor will shift to Defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Sam Glasscock III