Court Opinion

ID: 745999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 22:05:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:21.585579
License: Public Domain

124 F.3d 214
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Timothy L. TATE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 97-30000.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 1997.**Decided Sept. 29, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR-96-05291-JET;  Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding
MEMORANDUM*
Before HALL, BRUNETTI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1
Timothy L. Tate appeals his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.  His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Tate also filed a pro se supplemental brief.

2
Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

3
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3