Court Opinion

ID: 5722918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:12:15.360094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:44.457271
License: Public Domain

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on real property, defendants appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, dated November 23, 1959 and entered December 1, 1959, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff, fixing its lien at $1,389.79 and directing foreclosure of the lien and the sale of the property. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and the action remitted to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Neither the decision nor the judgment entered thereon makes any disposition of defendants’ counterclaim. Under the circumstances, it should be remitted to the trial court for a further decision, for a statement of the facts essential to dispose of the issues raised by the counterclaim and reply, and for the entry of an appropriate judgment consistent with the facts found (cf. Pinsker v. Pinsker, 44 App. Div. 501; Cable Flax Mills v. Early, 72 App. Div. 213; La Grange v. Merritt, 88 App. Div. 279). Defendants’ contention that they were deprived of a fair trial by reason of bias of the County Judge is wholly without merit or justification. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.