Court Opinion

ID: 2278006
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:57:48.342978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:39.862032
License: Public Domain

318 S.W.3d 788 (2010)
Leland LACHANCE, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 93451.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
August 31, 2010.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

*789 ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Leland LaChance appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.[1] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.