Court Opinion

ID: 711415
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:33:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:56.704634
License: Public Domain

74 F.3d 1232NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marcus A. JOSEPH, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.R.C. PETERSON;  Nancy Bloom;  Bill Austin, individually andin their official and professional capacities,Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7575.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Marcus A. Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

1
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

2
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Joseph v. Peterson, No. CA-95-2457-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED