Court Opinion

ID: 6023180
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:03:41.314329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:52.552866
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), rendered March 13, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review.
Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.