Court Opinion

ID: 3657246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:10:02.26185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:14.640212
License: Public Domain

Civil action to recover $900.00, alleged overpayment in the purchase of a lot of land.
The case revolves around an owelty charge against said lot, existing in favor of Mrs. Sadie Lilly, which plaintiffs allege was to be considered as a part of the purchase price and adjusted accordingly. This was denied by the defendants.
From a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.
The issues submitted are not accordant with the theory upon which the case was tried, but as the result agrees with the theory of the trial and involves only a question of fact, it would apparently serve no useful purpose to remand the cause for another hearing. Pate v. Gaitley,183 N.C. 262, 111 S.E. 339.
No error. *Page 810