Court Opinion

ID: 656384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:55.997034
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 818
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Raymond Ray JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Frederick HEINEMAN;  JoihnH. Baker;  Lee V. Bounds,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6818.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 27, 1993.Decided:  October 28, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Raymond Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Johnson v. Heineman, No. CA-93-155 (E.D.N.C. May 27, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel.   Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)