Court Opinion

ID: 8438746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:57:09.865774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.551471
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chestnut’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.