Court Opinion

ID: 4383851
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-03 20:41:54.933138+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:46.929433
License: Public Domain

People v Acevedo (2019 NY Slip Op 02535)

People v Acevedo

2019 NY Slip Op 02535

Decided on April 3, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 3, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2018-00652
 (Ind. No. 2444/17)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vAndrew Acevedo, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (David L. Goodwin of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Roni Piplani of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gia Morris, J.), imposed November 27, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid and does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. The Supreme Court's terse colloquy failed to advise the defendant of the nature of the right to appeal and to ensure that the defendant grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133; People v Vasquez, 101 AD3d 1054, 1054-1055).
However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court