Court Opinion

ID: 3122925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:33:40.485275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:14:29.762271
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-08-00549-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
BANK OF SOUTH TEXAS,                                                           Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
OFELIA A. SOLIS &
JOSE H. SOLIS 
D/B/A JHS COMPANY,                                                                Appellees.
____________________________________________________________
 
                           On
appeal from the 275th District Court 
                                       of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                        Before
Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Bank of South Texas, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th
District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1282-08-E. 
Appellant has filed a notice of dismissal of bankruptcy filing and motion to
dismiss the appeal on grounds that the bankruptcy court has entered an order
dismissing the bankruptcy, and all matters in controversy between the parties
have been resolved.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
On
February 12, 2009, this Court abated the case due to the bankruptcy of one of
the parties to this appeal.  See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8.  On May 7, 2010, the bankruptcy court
issued an order of dismissal.  Accordingly, the case is hereby REINSTATED.  
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that
the motion should be granted.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed
against the party incurring same. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court
will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at
appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our
mandate will issue forthwith.  Any
pending motions are
dismissed as moot.   
 
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 27th

day of August , 2010.