Court Opinion

ID: 1069024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 19:32:24.525365+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:37.957484
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Humphreys
Argued at Richmond, Virginia

MUGUET S. MARTIN
                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
v.   Record No. 2740-01-2             JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR.
                                             JUNE 18, 2002
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN

             FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HENRICO COUNTY
                    Catherine C. Hammond, Judge

          Neil Kuchinsky (Kuchinsky & Yeamans, P.C., on
          brief), for appellant.

          Andrew W. Wood (Law Office of Wood & Wood,
          P.C., on brief), for appellee.

     Muguet Martin contends on appeal that the trial court erred

in striking her evidence and denying her petition for a permanent

protective order, pursuant to Code § 16.1-279.1.   For the

following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

     Code § 16.1-279.1 provides that a protective order may be

issued in cases of family abuse.   Family abuse is defined as

"any act involving violence, force or threat including any

forceful detention, which results in physical injury or places

one in reasonable apprehension of serious bodily injury and

which is committed by a person against such person's family or

     * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not
designated for publication.
household member."      Code § 16.1-228.       A family or household

member includes children and a former spouse.           Id.

                              I.    BACKGROUND

        Muguet and Christopher Martin were divorced on January 22,

1999.       Mr. Martin was awarded custody of their three-year-old

son.

        On or about April 23, 2001, Mr. Martin was convicted in the

Louisa County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court of

cursing and abusing Ms. Martin by calling her a "f---ing whore."

On May 13, 2001, Ms. Martin picked up their son for visitation.

The boy presented her with a music compact disc ("CD") as a

Mother's Day gift.      The CD had three songs "burned" on it. 1

        The jewel case in which the CD was stored bore the

handwritten words "Happy Mother's Day Zack."          On the disc were

the names of three songs, "Two Steps Behind," "Hemorrhage," and

"A Song for Mamma."      Ms. Martin testified that the handwriting

on the jewel case and the CD, with the exception of the name

"Zack," appeared to be Mr. Martin's.

        The lyrics of the two songs in question were as follows:

                                   Hemmorage

               Memories are just where you need them . . .
               Drag the waters,
               till the depths give up their dead
               What did you expect to find?
               Was it something you left behind . . .

        1
       "Burning" a CD is a method of recording music from a
compact disc or the internet to a recordable CD. "Burning" a CD
is similar to copying an audio tape.

                                     - 2 -
Don't you remember anything I said when I said
To fall away, leave me to myself
To fall away, an leave love bleedin' in my hands,
in my hands again
Leave love bleedin' in my hands,
in my hands, love lies bleedin'
I hold it now, I feel the dangers,
am I the only place that you've left to go?
She cries that life is like,
some movie in black and white,
dead actors, naked lies
Over and over and over again she cries . . . .
To fall away, leave me to myself
To fall away, leave love bleedin' in my hands,
in my hands again
Leave love bleedin' in my hands,
in my hands, love lies bleedin'
And I wanted . . . you turn away,
you don't remember . . . but I do
You never even tried . . .
To fall away, leave me to myself
To fall away, leave love bleedin'
in my hands, in my hands again
Leave love bleedin' in my hands
in my hands again
Leave love bleedin' in my hands,
in my hands again . . . . Ohhhooohhhoohhhhhhohhh
Ohhhooohhhoohhhhhhohhh . . . . . .

              Two Steps Behind

Walk away if you want to.
It's OK, if you need to.
Well, you can run, but you can never hide
from the shadow that's creepin up beside you.

And there's a magic running through your soul,
But you can't have it all.
(Whatever you do)
Well, I'll be two steps behind you
(Wherever you go)
And I'll be there to remind you
that it only takes a minute of your precious time
to turn around and I'll be two steps behind.

Yeah, yeah.
Take the time to think about it.
Just walk the line, you know you just can't fight it

                    - 3 -
          And take a look around, you'll see what you can't
          find,
          Like the fire that's burnin' up inside me.

          Yeah, yeah.
          Oh.
          Yeah, baby.
          Two steps behind
          Oh, sugar,
          Two steps behind.

     Ms. Martin interpreted the lyrics of "Two Steps Behind" and

"Hemorrhage" to be a threat from Mr. Martin.   At trial, she

described her fear:

          Q: [Ms. Martin's attorney]: Was there
          something about the words when you listened
          to the CD your son handed you that disturb
          you?

          A:   [Ms. Martin]:   Um, yes.

          Q:   What was disturbing about the lyrics?

           *       *      *       *       *    *       *

          A: Um, it bothered me because the music
          itself is not something that I have known
          Zachary to listen to. And listening to the
          words, to me, it seemed like a message that
          my ex-husband was given [sic] to me.

          He had recently remarried, and I felt safe
          going out, and I started doing so. Getting
          this was clearly a message that I'm still
          not supposed to have a life or that I'm
          still supposed to be fearful of him that
          he's still going to be there.

          Q: So far as the song, Hemorrhage, were
          there particular words in there that caused
          you bother?

          A: Um, particularly so where it says,
          "don't you remember anything I said? When I
          said to fall away, leave me to myself to
          fall away and leave love bleeding in my
          hands. In my hands again. Leave love

                                - 4 -
           bleeding in my hands. In my hands love lies
           bleeding." I just -- It bothered me.

           Q: To what extent, if any, were you made
           fearful of these songs?

           A: I mean, listening to somebody describing
           love in someone else's hands, and bleeding,
           and everything -- I mean, that's not a
           romantic song . . . .

           Q: What about the song referencing dragging
           the lake?

           A: Again, that's where you're bringing up
           something that's dead or that can't be found
           or something. It's just --

           Q: To what extent, if any, do you believe
           that was making reference to you?

            *      *        *        *      *      *      *

           A: I felt that he was still threatening me.
           That he still believes that I belong to him.
           It doesn't matter that he has gone on with
           his life, and that if he wanted to, he could
           get rid of me and throw me in a lake or
           something. I mean, that was the extent of
           our marriage and our separation and
           everything.

     Perceiving the songs as a threat, Ms. Martin obtained on

June 1, 2001, from the Henrico County Juvenile and Domestic

Relations District Court, a preliminary protective order for

family abuse.   The order prohibited Mr. Martin from contact with

Ms. Martin and their son.       On June 4, 2001, Mr. Martin moved to

amend the preliminary protective order because he had custody of

the son.   A new preliminary protective order was issued,

removing the Martins' son from the scope of the order.

                                   - 5 -
     On June 29, 2001, the juvenile and domestic relations

district court dissolved the protective order and denied Ms.

Martin's motion for a "permanent" protective order.    Ms. Martin

appealed to the trial court.     A de novo trial was held on

September 10, 2001.   The trial court took evidence and listened

to the CD.   It sustained Mr. Martin's motion to strike the

evidence and denied Ms. Martin's petition for a protective

order.   She appeals that judgment.

                           II.    ANALYSIS

     "On appeal, we view the evidence and all reasonable

inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the

prevailing party below."   Reece v. Reece, 22 Va. App. 368, 372,

470 S.E.2d 148, 151 (1996).    A factual finding by the trial

court will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly wrong

or unsupported by the evidence.     Naulty v. Commonwealth, 2 Va.

App. 523, 527, 346 S.E.2d 540, 542 (1986).

     Ms. Martin contends that because she reasonably feared for

her safety based on the threatening nature of lyrics of the

songs "burned" on the CD, the trial court erred in striking her

evidence and denying her motion for a protective order.    Under

Code § 16.1-279.1, reasonable apprehension of serious bodily

injury is an objective standard, requiring a factual

determination by the court.    The trial court found that this

standard was not met.

                                 - 6 -
      Through her son, Ms. Martin received from Mr. Martin a CD

containing three songs.   She perceived two of the songs to be a

threat.   At trial, she described what disturbed her about the

CD.   She stated:

           I felt that he was still threatening me.
           That he still believes that I belong to him.
           It doesn't matter that he has gone on with
           his life, and that if he wanted to, he could
           get rid of me and throw me in a lake or
           something.

(Emphasis added.)

      She described no reasonable fear of immediate, serious

bodily harm.   Thus, the trial court held that, taken as a whole,

the evidence did not prove an actual threat or that Mr. Martin's

conduct was abuse within the meaning of the statute.    The

evidence supports that finding.

      The trial judge observed the parties and was familiar with

the general circumstances of the case.    This circumstance

underlies the accepted standard of review and requires that we

uphold the trial court's decision.     Cudjoe v. Commonwealth, 23
Va. App. 193, 201, 475 S.E.2d 821, 825 (1996).    The judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

                                                          Affirmed.

                               - 7 -