Court Opinion

ID: 9832926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:18:35.871212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:55.673278
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We have delayed passing on the motion for rehearing inasmuch as one of the questions involved was a construction of subdivision 14, art. 1969a, Rev. Civ. Stats., and the Supreme Court had that question before it in the Diamond Ice and Cold Storage Co. v. Strube Case, 284 S. W. 935, on certified question. On June 9th, the Supreme Court answered the question, and held, in effect, that the trial court had authority to determine an amended motion for new trial more than 45 days after the filing of the original motion for new trial. This action of the Supreme Court answers one of the questions involved In this case against the contention of appellants.
We have carefully read and considered other questions urged in the motion, hut do not think we erred in our disposal of them on original hearing.
Therefore the motion is overruled.