Court Opinion

ID: 6002991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 10:06:48.114392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:12.151296
License: Public Domain

We agree with the motion court that plaintiff’s motion to stay family offense proceedings pending in Family Court and to compel arbitration of the domestic violence issues involved therein was frivolous, and deserving of the $1,000 sanction imposed on plaintiff’s former attorney. The motion should have been made in Family Court (CPLR 7503 [a]); plaintiff’s participation in the Family Court proceeding for over a year constituted a waiver of any right to arbitrate (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, 272); and the stipulation of settlement and judgment of divorce containing the arbitration provision did not specifically provide for arbitration of domestic violence issues (see, Bowmer v Bowmer, 50 NY2d 288). Under the circumstances, the motion to enforce the arbitration provision can be deemed nothing other than an attempt to further delay resolution of the Family Court proceeding in which defendant sought an order of protection against plaintiff. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.