Court Opinion

ID: 2879734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 05:33:26.812793+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:23.617195
License: Public Domain

i          i      i                                                                        i       i       i

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                          No. 04-09-00709-CR

                                       IN RE Josephus DUNCAN

                                    Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Rebecca Simmons, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           Relator Josephus Duncan has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel

the trial court to rule on his pro se “Motion in Limine - Enhancement Counts,” “Motion for

Quantitative Weight Analysis,” and “Motion to Set Aside Indictment.” However, Duncan is

represented by retained counsel in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is

currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v.

State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on a pro

se motion filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by

           1
         … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6325, styled The State of Texas v. Josephus Duncan,
pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.
                                                                                         04-09-00709-CR

counsel. Id. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator’s

pro se motions that relate directly to his confinement based on the criminal proceeding pending in

the trial court. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX . R. APP . P.

52.8(a).

                                                         PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                   -2-