Court Opinion

ID: 5653685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 23:31:45.769681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:42.408411
License: Public Domain

MARKS, J.
Except for the insurance carrier and the amounts of the insurance policies involved, the facts of this case and the issues of law involved are identical with those in New York Life Insurance Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., ante, p. 747 [111 Pac. (2d) 707].
Upon the authority1 of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Barnard, P. J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 22, 1941. Shenk, J., and Edmonds, J., did not participate herein.
*0REPORTS OF CASES DETERMINED IN THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT. Hartley Shaw.......................... Presiding Judge Edward T. Bishop................................Judge B. Rey Schauer..................................Judge APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT. Franklin A. Griffin....................Presiding Judge Thomas M. Foley.................................Judge Robert L. McWilliams............................Judge APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT. Charles C. Haines L. N. Turrentine. Arthur L. Mundo. Presiding Judge ..........Judge ..........Judge 43 O. A. (2d)
*Supp. 851REPORTS OF CASES „ DETERMINED IN THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENTS OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.