Court Opinion

ID: 9396211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-19 20:04:18.16257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:14.869826
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                            Electronically Filed
                                            Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                            CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                            19-MAY-2023
                                            08:16 AM
                                            Dkt. 24 ODSD
                          NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

                 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                        OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

  LIGAYA NAVASCA and RAYMOND SEBASTIAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
               ROBERT ROSS, Defendant-Appellant, and
 PAUL HAYCRAFT; DAVID YAMADA; WALTER SERGENT; and GENE SORDILLA,
                        Defendants-Appellees

        APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                         HONOLULU DIVISION
                     (CIVIL NO. 1DRC-21-10106)

                        ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
        (By:    Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)
             Upon review of the record, it appears that:
             (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief
were due on or before November 21, 2022, and December 19, 2022,
respectively;
             (2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant Robert Ross
(Ross) failed to file either document, or request an extension of
time;
             (3) On January 20, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a
default notice informing Ross that the time for filing the
statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the
matter would be called to the court's attention on January 30,
2023, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of
the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)
Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Ross could request relief from default
by motion;
  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

             (4) The appellate clerk mailed the notice of entering
case on calendar and the default notice to Ross at his addresses
on record in this appeal and they were returned as undeliverable;
             (5) HRAP Rule 25(f) requires a self-represented party,
within 10 days of any change in mailing address, to file a notice
of change of address with the appellate clerk; and
             (6) Ross has not filed a notice of change of address,
and Ross took no further action in this appeal.
             Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed.
             DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai i, May 19, 2023.

                                        /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
                                        Chief Judge

                                        /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                        Associate Judge

                                        /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan
                                        Associate Judge

                                    2