Court Opinion

ID: 8679513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:17:33.934508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:28.758290
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Charles Meade appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meade v. Norris, No. 2:15-cv-00319-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. July 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.