Court Opinion

ID: 8444400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 20:37:18.803179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:52.777319
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Terence Jerome Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), in which he sought reconsideration of the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by the district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED