Court Opinion

ID: 9368183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 01:00:27.65333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:06.217036
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50515         Document: 00516633352             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/02/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50515
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 2, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   David Olmos,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 1:21-CR-146-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Olmos has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Olmos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50515     Document: 00516633352          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/02/2023

                                   No. 22-50515

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2