Court Opinion

ID: 9772486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 17:19:36.111842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:44.829764
License: Public Domain

CULVER, Justice
(dissenting in part).
I agree with the Court of Civil Appeals that the findings of the jury, to wit, that Beaty was in possession of facts that would have put an ordinarily prudent person upon inquiry that if diligently, pursued, .would have led to the discovery, prior to May 28, 1946, that the agreements as written did terminate its purchase rights with respect to the two tracts, and that Beaty failed to exercise reasonable diligence to discover the legal effect of the agreeement and would have done so by the exercise of reasonable diligence, are supported by the evidence.
I therefore dissent in part.