Court Opinion

ID: 2825341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-11 06:05:27.696744+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:29.449196
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
 

  Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination that found him guilty of interfering with an employee, refusing a direct order, making threats and a movement regulation violation. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination
  
   (see Matter of Raduns v Prack,
  
  122 AD3d 995, 995-996 [2014];
  
   Matter of Harris v Prack,
  
  122 AD3d 981, 981 [2014]). In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot
  
   (see Matter of McCaskell v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision,
  
  128 AD3d 1208, 1208-1209 [2015];
  
   Matter of Bain v Annucci,
  
  127 AD3d 1533, 1533 [2015]).
 

  Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.
 

  Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.