Court Opinion

ID: 6031751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:55:17.980779+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:17.738408
License: Public Domain

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 9, 1997, as granted the motion of the defendants M&S Deli and Mun Taek Oh d/b/a M&S Deli to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The complaint was automatically dismissed against the defendants M&S Deli and Mun Taek Oh d/b/a M&S Deli when the plaintiffs failed to file proof of service, and there was no appearance by either defendant within 120 days after the date of filing of the summons and complaint (see, CPLR former 306-b; Cerrito v Galioto, 216 AD2d 265). Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the plaintiffs’ argument that the defendant M&S Deli appeared in this action is without merit (see, Simkins v Gruenspan, 118 Misc 2d 107, 109; cf., Nardi v Hirsch, 253 AD2d 575).
In light of our determination herein, it is unnecessary to *318reach the appellants’ remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.