Court Opinion

ID: 9402771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-16 19:04:08.19264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:02.499226
License: Public Domain

Electronically Filed
                                                               Supreme Court
                                                               SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                               26-MAY-2023
                                                               08:07 AM
                                                               Dkt. 14 ODMR

                              SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
________________________________________________________________

                      IN RE RONALD CARLSON
________________________________________________________________

                           ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

              ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
          (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.) 1

      Upon consideration of the document filed on May 24, 2023,
which we construe as a motion for reconsideration, the motion is
untimely because it was filed more than ten days after this
court’s January 20, 2023 order dismissing the petition.             See
Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40(a).
      Even if the motion were timely, this court has not
overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact.            See HRAP
Rule 40(b).
      It is ordered that the motion is denied.
            DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 26, 2023.
                                    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
                                    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
                                    /s/ Todd W. Eddins

1     Associate Justice Paula A. Nakayama and Associate Justice Michael D.
Wilson, who were members of the court when the case was decided, retired from
the bench on April 21, 2023, and March 31, 2023, respectively.