Court Opinion

ID: 1001243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:52:32.328369+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:18.568743
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CREADELL HUBBARD,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh.    Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-88-40, CA-97-320-BO)

Submitted:   March 23, 2000                 Decided:   March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Creadell Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Creadell Hubbard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Hubbard, Nos. CR-88-

40; CA-97-320-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 1999).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2