Court Opinion

ID: 2891051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 21:07:46.711791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:57.955656
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-03-0433-CR

                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                             AT AMARILLO

                                                 PANEL E

                                     FEBRUARY 18, 2004
                               ______________________________

                                         ROBERT JOHNSON,

                                                                   Appellant

                                                      v.

                                       THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                    Appellee
                            _________________________________

              FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

            NO. 2002-439339; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING
                        _______________________________

                                 ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                            __________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

        Robert Johnson (appellant) appeals his conviction of possession of controlled

substance of less than one gram in a drug free zone. The clerk’s record was filed on

December 23, 2003, the reporter’s record was filed on November 19, 2003, and a

supplemental reporter’s record was filed on November 24, 2003. Thus, appellant’s brief

was due on January 22, 2004. However, one was not filed on that date. On February 2,

        1
        John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Re t.), Seventh C ourt of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code
Ann. §75.00 2(a)(1) (V erno n Su pp. 2004 ).
2004, this Court notified counsel for appellant that neither the brief nor an extension of time

to file appellant’s brief had been filed. Counsel for appellant was also admonished that if

appellant did not respond to the court’s letter by February 12, 2004, the appeal would be

abated to the trial court. That date has passed, and appellant has not filed a brief or

moved for an extension. Nor has he responded to the court’s February 2nd letter.

       Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 364th District

Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following:

       1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

       2.     whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and,

       3.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
              counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate
              brief. See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35,
              83 L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is
              entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of
              right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
              submitting an appellate brief).

       We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue this appeal, is indigent, has appointed counsel, and has been denied effective

assistance of counsel, or has no counsel, then we further direct it to appoint new counsel

to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The name, address, phone number, telefax

number, and state bar number of the new counsel who will represent appellant on appeal

must also be included in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore,

the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing

                                              2
the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the

evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial

court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on

or before March 19, 2004. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the

trial court may request same on or before March 19, 2004.

       It is so ordered.

                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                             3