Court Opinion

ID: 9396881
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-23 21:00:34.151324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:19.872924
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7302      Doc: 8         Filed: 05/22/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7302

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        DENISE WHITE, a/k/a Lisa Young, a/k/a Lisa White,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cr-00034-ELH-2)

        Submitted: May 18, 2023                                             Decided: May 22, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Denise White, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7302       Doc: 8         Filed: 05/22/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Denise White appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release and denying her request for an audit of

        her court-ordered restitution. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district

        court’s denial of compassionate release, see United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th

        Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review), or the denial of White’s challenge to her restitution.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.           United States v. White, No.

        1:19-cr-00034-ELH-2 (D. Md. Oct. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

                                                      2