Court Opinion

ID: 7939531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:13:18.627645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:40.202969
License: Public Domain

Grant, C. J.
The relator and one Cyrus Johnston entered into an agreement of arbitration, under chapter 292, 2 How. Stat. Three arbitrators were chosen. The proceedings were regular, and an award was duly and legally made. Relator moved for a confirmation. Johns*36ton moved to vacate the award, upon the ground that the arbitrators exceeded their powers. Upon the hearing of the two motions, the former was denied, and the letter granted. The grounds upon which such award may be vacated are defined in the statute (2 How. Stat. § 8482). Johnston claimed before the arbitrators that he should be allowed an item of $500. . This was contested by the relator. The testimony was conflicting, and the arbitrators decided in his favor. The circuit judge reviewed this evidence, and reversed the decision of the arbitrators.
The vacation of the award involved an examination into the testimony 'iipon which the arbitrators based it. Courts do not possess this power, under the statute. Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Hughes, 28 Mich. 186. The circuit judge was in error in holding that it was in his power to vacate the award if, in his opinion, the ends of justice required it. The award is conclusive, and the court can only refuse to enter judgment confirming it for one of the reasons specified in the statute. Neither of these reasons existed. The circuit judge, and not the arbitrators, exceeded his powers. He should have confirmed the award.
The writ will issue as prayed.
The other Justices concurred.