Court Opinion

ID: 4774576
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-18 11:13:46.850735+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:09:29.545298
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to McArthur’s petition we issued a writ of habeas corpus and required a return by the respondent. We have considered the matter on the petition, the return and the respondent’s reply to the return. Upon such consideration it is apparent that there is no merit to the petition. The writ of habeas corpus is discharged and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.