Court Opinion

ID: 69486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:47:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:08.200186
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                FILED
                                                               October 30, 2009
                               No. 08-60874
                             Summary Calendar                Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

HOPETON GEORGE SIMPSON

                                           Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

                                           Respondent

                    Petition for Review of an Order of the
                       Board of Immigration Appeals
                             BIA No. A21 041 361

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Hopeton George Simpson petitions this court to review the decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal and affirming the
immigration judge’s (IJ) order that Simpson was ineligible for cancellation of
removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3) because he had committed an
aggravated felony. Simpson, who has been convicted in state court of possession
of controlled substances on more than one occasion since his admission to the

      *
      Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
                                  No. 08-60874

United States, contends that none of his convictions constitutes an aggravated
felony in its own right. He argues that he should not be deemed an aggravated
felon based on his recidivism because he was not convicted of a recidivist offense
in state court. Simpson also argues that the rule of lenity should be applied.
      The BIA correctly determined that Simpson had committed an aggravated
felony for immigration law purposes. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 570 F.3d
263, 266-68 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (July 15, 2009) (No. 09-60).
The rule of lenity is not applicable given this court’s interpretation of the
relevant statutory language. Id. at 268 n.7.
      Simpson’s petition for review is DENIED.

                                        2