Court Opinion

ID: 5260598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:41:38.293596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:04.581892
License: Public Domain

Order overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See opinions in Morrell v. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co., No. 1 [ante, pp. 1, 6, 7], decided herewith.) Mills, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur; Blackmar, J., dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Morrell v. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co., No. 1 (ante, p. 7), and thinks that the order overruling demurrer should be reversed and the demurrer sustained, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurs.