Court Opinion

ID: 2825292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-11 06:03:30.762174+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:44.888247
License: Public Domain

People v Hidalgo (2015 NY Slip Op 06438)

People v Hidalgo

2015 NY Slip Op 06438

Decided on August 5, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 5, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2013-08278
 (Ind. No. 2608/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vYamilette Hidalgo, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed August 5, 2013, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, SGROI, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court