Court Opinion

ID: 5283706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 00:44:39.025714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:29.111753
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Jacqueline T. Pittman appeals from the trial court’s judgment upholding the administrative revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath under Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, Section 577.020 RSMo 2006. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Velluto v. Dir. of Revenue, 383 S.W.3d 14, 17 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided *546a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).