Court Opinion

ID: 9401087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-10 00:00:45.467782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:50.735490
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10842         Document: 00516781755             Page: 1      Date Filed: 06/09/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10842
                                     Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                     ____________                                     June 9, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jose Hugo Gonzalez Hernandez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:21-CR-305-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jose Hugo Gonzalez Hernandez
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez Hernandez has filed a response. The record is
   not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Gonzalez

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10842     Document: 00516781755           Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/09/2023

                                    No. 22-10842

   Hernandez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline
   to consider them without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v.
   Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez Hernandez’s response. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                               2