Court Opinion

ID: 2964938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:33:12.759447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:43.802389
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-1366

                                    UNITED STATES,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                      PASQUALE MUNAFO, A/K/A PAT, A/K/A FAT PAT,

                                Defendant, Appellant.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            John Wall on brief for appellant.
            _________
            Donald K. Stern, United  States Attorney, James  C. Rehnquist  and
            _______________                           ___________________
        Ernest S.  Dinisco, Assistant  United States  Attorneys, on  brief for
        __________________
        appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                   October 14, 1997
                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.   Upon careful review, we perceive  no clear
                 __________

            error in the district court's  determination of the amount of

            loss.    Further,  no improper  double  counting  occurred in

            adjusting appellant's  sentence both for  his managerial role

            in the offense under U.S.S.G.    3B1.1(b), as well as for his

            business  of receiving  and  selling  stolen  property  under

            U.S.S.G.   2B1.1(b)(4)(B).  See  United States v. Reeves,  83
                                        ___  _____________    ______

            F.3d 203, 208 (8th Cir. 1996).

                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___

                                         -2-