Court Opinion

ID: 9829318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:12:00.2082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:59.843761
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
It appears from the transcript the judgment in this case was rendered on the 15th day of July, 1947, that an amended motion for a new trial was filed on August 5, 1947. No leave, for filing this amended motion appears in the transcript. The date of filing of the original motion does not appear. This amended motion was never called to the attention of the trial court. If overruled it was by operation of law by the lapse of time. Whether or not the original motion was filed in conformity with Section (k) of Rule 330 does not appear. It is thought that error may not be assigned on an amended motion for a new trial upon which the trial court *149has never ruled unless a timely filing of the original motion be shown. Error may not be assigned on an amended motion for a new trial upon which the trial court has never ruled unless it appears that leave to file same was granted by the trial court. Error is not shown by the record before this court.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.