Court Opinion

ID: 9516010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:17:52.805633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:42.729495
License: Public Domain

OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Albert Rhymer sued his former employer, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), un*89der Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185. Rhymer does not allege that his union breached its duty of fair representation. Rhymer nonetheless argues that he has standing to sue because he claims that UPS engaged in fraud during arbitration proceedings relating to his discharge. The district court dismissed Rhymer’s suit. The court held that Rhymer lacked standing because he does not allege that his union breached its duty of fair representation. In the alternative, the court dismissed the suit because Rhymer could have discovered the fraud prior to the arbitration proceedings. After considering the briefs, the joint appendix, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude that the district court reached the correct result. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhymer v. United Parcel ' Service, Inc., No. 1:98CV00869 (M.D.N.C. Apr.10, 2000).

AFFIRMED.