Court Opinion

ID: 2280972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:58:20.089528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:55.096669
License: Public Domain

322 S.W.3d 635 (2010)
Richard ZGIET, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94614.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
October 12, 2010.
Brocca Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Karen L. Kramer, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Richard Zgiet, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).