Court Opinion

ID: 997230
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:53:27.119092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:46.736654
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

OSTER WITHERSPOON, a/k/a Little Man,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-91-288, CA-96-3536-8-2)

Submitted:   November 19, 1998            Decided:   December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oster Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Oster Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Witherspoon, Nos. CR-91-

288; CA-96-3536-8-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2