Court Opinion

ID: 9832282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:47:21.946108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:45.244504
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We find no evidence that Jackson Brewing Company had any part in making The Jax Distributing Company a distributor of its beer in Fort Worth, rather than Palmer, and we find no evidence even tending to show that Jax Beer Company would profit by changing the distributor from Palmer to Jax Distributing Company.
*455The evidence, as we analyze it, does not tend to show a conspiracy entered into by any two of the named defendants to destroy Palmer’s business.
The conclusions we have reached are not in conflict with the holding's in any authority cited and relied upon by appellee.
The motion for a rehearing is overruled.