Court Opinion

ID: 9804061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 16:19:21.06199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:03:55.821509
License: Public Domain

MURDOCK, Justice
(concurring in the result).
I agree that nothing in the warnings posted by Yanmar America Corporation or in the physical notices mailed by it to dealers increased the risk of harm to anyone who might have seen or received the same, much less someone in Autrey Nichols’s or Randy Nichols’s position. As a threshold matter, however, I question whether Yanmar America conceded that it understood a duty to warn any person (including Autrey and Randy) who did not happen upon its Web site postings or actually receive one of its mailings, and I am not persuaded that the evidence presented, including the testimony of Ryan Pott, supports a contrary conclusion. I therefore concur in the result.