Court Opinion

ID: 9433254
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:39:33.946458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:40.311276
License: Public Domain

Justice Stevens,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
While I join Parts I, II-A, and II-C of the Court’s opinion, and while I also agree with the Court’s reasons for concluding that § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not create an implied partial repeal of the Full Faith and Credit Act, I join neither Part II-B nor the Court’s judgment because I agree with Justice Ginsburg that the question of Delaware law should be addressed by the Court of Appeals in the first instance, and that the Ninth Circuit remains free to consider whether Delaware courts fully and fairly litigated the adequacy of class representation.