Court Opinion

ID: 993190
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:04:06.239512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:53.815724
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-92-135-R, CA-97-473-R)

Submitted:   September 25, 1997           Decided:   October 10, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel, for preparation of
a transcript at government expense, for general relief, and to pre-

clude the Assistant United States Attorney from these proceedings,

deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nance, Nos. CR-
92-135-R; CA-97-473-R (W.D. Va. July 9, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2