Court Opinion

ID: 9939977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-13 15:13:32.476523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:10.122663
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                    San Antonio, Texas
                               MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                       No. 04-23-00999-CV

                                        Frank HERRERA,
                                            Appellant

                                                v.

                               INVERTERRA HOLDINGS, LLC,
                                        Appellee

                    From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2023CI00438
                            Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:         Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                 Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
                 Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 7, 2024

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           Appellant Frank Herrera has filed this appeal from an interlocutory order granting

Inverterra Holdings, LLC’s motion for continuance. Unless authorized by statute, an order that

does not dispose of all pending parties and claims remains interlocutory and unappealable until the

trial court signs a final judgment. See City of Houston v. Estate of Jones, 388 S.W.3d 663, 666

(Tex. 2012); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). “An order granting a

motion for continuance . . . is not a final judgment, nor is it an appealable interlocutory order.”

Am. Med. Home Health Servs., LLC v. Legacy Home Health Agency, Inc., No. 04-22-00239-CV,
                                                                                 04-23-00999-CV

2022 WL 2334557, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 29, 2022, pet. filed). We therefore issued

an order directing Herrera to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for

lack of jurisdiction. Herrera did not respond. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

                                               PER CURIAM

                                              -2-