Court Opinion

ID: 4708855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-04 00:00:54.960099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:53.507097
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40793      Document: 00515964249         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/03/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                       August 3, 2021
                                  No. 20-40793                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Raul Silva-Rosas,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:20-CR-289-1

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Silva-Rosas
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva-Rosas has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40793     Document: 00515964249          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/03/2021

                                   No. 20-40793

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2