Court Opinion

ID: 990956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:29:28.339809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:59.985136
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6749

RICHARD WADE KENDRICK,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN B. METZGER, III; SANDRA COMBS; LINDA
PITTMAN; JOSEPH LEWIS; WINNIE DIXON,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-679-R)

Submitted:   November 21, 1996            Decided:   December 4, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Wade Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Kendrick v. Metzger, No. CA-95-679-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 16, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2