Court Opinion

ID: 3923634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:50:13.99705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:54.820750
License: Public Domain

This case was set for submission on April 1st. Appellant filed his briefs in this court on March 23d, and delivered a copy thereof to attorneys for appellees on March 24th. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of appellant's failure to comply with the rules with reference to filing briefs, alleging that they have not been given sufficient time in which to answer appellant's brief. When the appellee insists upon the enforcement of the rules, and the court cannot say that it is evident that ample time remains to appellee in which to answer, the appeal should be *Page 1195 
dismissed. Hamilton v. McLane, 147 S.W. 284, and cases cited.
We have examined the brief, and, after considering the same, and the facts shown by the motions, we conclude that it was not incumbent upon appellees to undertake to brief the case in the limited time left them after receipt of appellants' brief. We have been exceedingly liberal in passing upon questions of this kind, in order to prevent dismissals, but the practice appears to be growing steadily among the members of the bar of filing briefs after the time prescribed by the rules, and this court is continually called upon to pass on motions to dismiss. Too much of the time of this court is taken up in deciding questions of this kind, and in waiting on appellees to file briefs after motions to dismiss have been overruled.
The motion is granted, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, and appellant is permitted to withdraw transcript