Court Opinion

ID: 5149195
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 01:48:54.256669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:57.241415
License: Public Domain

[1] This is an appeal from the denial of postconviction relief in the District Court of Kay County, Case No. 3983, wherein the trial court, after reviewing the records made findings of fact and conclusions of law which findings of fact and conclusions of law are supported by the record and adopted by this Court and appended hereto.
[2] For the reasons therein stated, the trial court's denial of post conviction relief is affirmed.
[3] BRETT and NIX, JJ., concur.
 APPENDIX
 In the District Court in and for Kay County, State of
 Oklahoma
The State of Oklahoma, |
 Plaintiff, |
 -vs- No. 3983
 Timothy Lee, |
 Defendant. |
 JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
 This cause coming on for hearing upon the Application of
Timothy Lee for post-conviction relief; The State of Oklahoma
appears by the Assistant District Attorney, Donald C. Welch; and
the applicant
 *Page 366 
herein in appears by his court-appointed attorney,
Leslie Page.
 The Court, having examined the files and being fully advised in
the premises, finds that the defendant based his claim for
post-conviction relief on the allegation that a witness testified
in violation of the rule as to sequestration of witnesses. The
court finds that Jean Daniels did testify in the cause but that
the rule with respect to sequestration of witnesses was not
applied to her for the reason that she was a rebuttal witness
only. The Court finds that the application for Post-Conviction
Relief should be denied.
 It is, therefore, by the Court considered, ordered, adjudged
and decreed that the Application for Post-Conviction Relief of
Timothy Lee is hereby denied; to which ruling and judgment of the
court the defendant excepts, and exception is allowed.
 Done in open court this 24th day of June, 1971.
 /s/ Lowell Doggett
 Associate District Judge
 Kay County, Oklahoma