Court Opinion

ID: 9410439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-21 13:08:00.623214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:57.827600
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                               EASTERN DISTRICT

 POM OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC                          : No. 10 EAP 2023
                                                   :
                                                   :
               v.                                  :
                                                   :
                                                   :
 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                     :
 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AND CITY                   :
 OF PHILADELPHIA,                                  :
                                                   :
                                                   :
 APPEAL OF: COMMONWEALTH OF                        :
 PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF                       :
 REVENUE                                           :

                                          ORDER

PER CURIAM                                                       DECIDED: July 21, 2023
       AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2023, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See

42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of the

Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the

Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disposes

of all claims and of all parties”); Pa.R.Civ.P. 232(a) (“A discontinuance or nonsuit shall

not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a counterclaim theretofore filed.”). Cf.

Melvin v. Doe, 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n order denying a motion for summary

judgment does not terminate the litigation, and thus is not an appealable order.”).

       The Application for Leave to File Answer to Jurisdictional Statement Nunc Pro

Tunc is DISMISSED as moot.