Court Opinion

ID: 9717872
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:11:58.85732+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:13:48.548338
License: Public Domain

Griffin, J.
I concur. However, I am compelled to observe that the logic and policies which support the Court’s decision in this instance are equally applicable in the case of a child’s claim for loss of parental society and companionship. For the reasons set forth by the Chief Justice in this case and by Justice Levin in his dissent in Berger v Weber, 411 Mich 1, 18-49; 303 NW2d 424 (1981), I would go a step further today and indicate that the inconsistent holding laid down by the four to three vote of this Court in Berger will no longer be regarded as precedent.