Court Opinion

ID: 8040319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:29:38.335918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:17.852834
License: Public Domain

Boslatjgh, J.
The defendant was charged with committing a forcible rape on August 26, 1974. While released on bond, he was charged with committing a robbery and a second rape on October 20, 1974.
The defendant pleaded guilty to the rape committed oh August 26, 1974, and was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 to 45 years. The other charges were dismissed. The defendant appeals, claiming that the sentence was excessive and he is entitled to a reduction in sentence under the terms of L.B. 23, Laws 1975.
The defendant is 20 years of age. He has a juvenile record and was committed to the Youth Development Center twice. Apparently, he is very aggressive sexually, particularly with older women.
On August 26, 1974, the defendant broke into the home of a 60-year-old woman who lived alone, and abused her physically and sexually for a period of 3 hours. When he left he took a small amount of money from her home. The charge on October 20, 1974, involved the robbery and rape of a 75-year-old woman. On this occasion he carried a gun.
The crime involved in this case was an aggravated offense which involved considerable violence and abuse of the victim. As the trial court observed, a sentence was necessary for the protection of the public. There was no abuse of discretion and the sentence imposed was not excessive.
The defendant’s contention in regard to L.B. 23 has no merit. In State v. Country, ante p. 570, 234 N. W. 2d 593, this court held L.B. 23 defined a new crime and was not an amendatory act. The doctrine of State v. Randolph, 186 Neb. 297, 183 N. W. 2d 225, is not applicable. See, also, State v. Trowbridge, ante p. 582, 234 N. W. 2d 598.
*587The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.