Court Opinion

ID: 2950893
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:50:36.473398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:48.513215
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-82,014-01

                         EX PARTE CRISTIAN AGUILAR, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 1388321-A IN THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of attempted

evading detention and sentenced to 180 days in the county jail. He did not appeal his conviction.

        Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to properly advise him of the deportation

consequences of his guilty plea. See Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). The trial court made

findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we set aside Applicant’s conviction.

The State agreed. We believe that the record is not adequate to resolve Applicant’s claim.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
                                                                                                      2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

       Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.

TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

removal proceedings have been initiated in Applicant’s case and his conviction is a deportable

offense. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 14, 2015
Do not publish