Court Opinion

ID: 9887183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 17:14:02.32143+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:34.037925
License: Public Domain

Johnson, J., concurring:
I concur for the reasons set out in my dissent in State v.Sandoval , 308 Kan. ----, 366 P.3d 665 (No. 113,299, this day decided) (Johnson, J., dissenting), slip op. at 10. A district judge who pronounces sentence after a probation revocation inevitably sentences anew. Even if the original sentence was illegal, it no longer exists and cannot be corrected by a State motion filed under K.S.A. 22-3504(1).
Rosen, J., joins in the foregoing concurring opinion.