Court Opinion

ID: 4911506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-16 18:00:35.338341+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:32.695892
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40127      Document: 00516016883         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/16/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                  No. 21-40127                      September 16, 2021
                                Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Juan Romero-Gonzalez,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:20-CR-1590-1

   Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Romero-
   Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Romero-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40127     Document: 00516016883         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/16/2021

                                  No. 21-40127

   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2