Court Opinion

ID: 4178406
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-16 19:11:27.503767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:14.028608
License: Public Domain

People v Parker (2017 NY Slip Op 05019)

People v Parker

2017 NY Slip Op 05019

Decided on June 16, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 16, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

882 KA 15-01765

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vDURVAL W. PARKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (HANNAH STITH LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered April 21, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]). Defendant's sole contention is that, under CPL 20.40 and the New York Constitution, the Erie County grand jury lacked authority and jurisdiction to indict him for the crime committed in Niagara County to which he pleaded guilty. We conclude that defendant's contention is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see generally People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 573-574). Although defendant contends that the waiver does not encompass his challenge to the geographic jurisdiction of the grand jury inasmuch as that issue was not specifically mentioned during the waiver colloquy, the court "need not expressly delineate for a defendant those appellate issues that are foreclosed by a waiver of the right to appeal, and those that survive, in order for the court to obtain a valid appeal waiver" (People v Nickell, 49 AD3d 1024, 1025). We note, in any event, that defendant's challenge to geographical jurisdiction in Erie County is foreclosed by his guilty plea (see People v Hand, 140 AD3d 636, 637, lv denied 28 NY3d 971).
Entered: June 16, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court