Court Opinion

ID: 9663820
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 23:52:12.103251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:57.603536
License: Public Domain

*670aThe following memorandum was filed February 1, 1968.
Per Curiam (on motion for rehearing). The motion for rehearing raises the question of issues affecting the plaintiff and his burden of proof upon the new trial. We have determined that the questions of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence and his damages have been resolved and need not be retried.
The plaintiff’s complaint alleges causal negligence on the part of both the defendant, Sandra Seal, and the employees of the defendant, Stokely-Van Camp. Both defendants have cross-complained against each other. At the new trial the plaintiff will have the burden to prove negligence on the part of any or all of the defendants, as he chooses, and the defendants will have the burden to prove the allegations of their respective cross complaints.