Court Opinion

ID: 9416488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:47:28.666828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:39.240918
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice DANIEL.
I concur in the conclusion adopted by the court in these causes (Paup et al. v. Drew, and Trigg et al. v. Drew); but Whilst I do this I cannot claim to myself the argument upon which that conclusion professes to be founded. The principles and reasonings propounded in these cases, and in that of Woodruff v. Trapnall, appear to me to place all three of the cases essentially upon the same platform, and establish no valid or sound distinction between them, but should, if those principles and reasonings be correct, have led to the same conclusion in them all.
Mr. Justice CATRON.
I concur-with my brother Daniel.