Court Opinion

ID: 2397802
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:21:22.365177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:24:38.876436
License: Public Domain

374 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2005)
In re IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN DETAINEES LITIGATION
No. MDL 1686.
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
June 17, 2005.
*1357 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL[*] and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.

TRANSFER ORDER
WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.
This litigation currently consists of four actions pending, respectively, in the District of Connecticut, Northern District of Illinois, District of South Carolina, and Southern District of Texas as listed on the attached Schedule A. Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, brought by plaintiffs[1] in the four actions for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of these actions in the Southern District of New York or, in the alternative, the District of Connecticut or the Northern District of Illinois. The United States and the individual defendants[2] oppose the motion; if the Panel orders transfer, they would favor the Eastern District of Virginia as the transferee district.[3]
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these four actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the District of District of Columbia will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All MDL-1686 actions present common, complex legal and factual questions concerning allegations that the defendants authorized and implemented a policy, pattern or practice of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in detention centers in Iraq and/or Afghanistan and also failed to respond to reports of such abuses. Centralization under Section 1407 is thus necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.
In selecting the District of District of Columbia as transferee district, the nation's capital provides a particularly appropriate forum for lawsuits brought against the Secretary of Defense and three senior military officers for conduct that allegedly transpired in connection with their work for the United States. We observe that Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan, to whom we are assigning this litigation, is an experienced Section 1407 transferee judge, and we are confident that we are entrusting this important assignment to an able jurist.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A are transferred to the District of District of Columbia and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Thomas F. Hogan for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.

SCHEDULE A
MDL-1686  In re Iraq and Afghanistan Detainees Litigation
District of Connecticut
Arkan Mohammed Ali, et al. v. Thomas Pappas, C.A. No. 3:05-371
*1358 Northern District of Illinois
Arkan Mohammed Ali, et al. v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, C.A. No. 1:05-1201
District of South Carolina
Arkan Mohammed Ali, et al. v. Janis Karpinski, C.A. No. 9:05-654
Southern District of Texas
Arkan Mohammed Ali, et al. v. Ricardo Sanchez, C.A. No. 7:05-65
NOTES
[*]   Judge Vratil took no part in the decision of this matter.
[1]  Arkan Mohammed Ali, Thahe Mohammed Sabbar, Sherzad Kamal Khalid, Ali H., Mehboob Ahmad, Said Nabi Siddiqi, Mohammed Karim Shirullah, and Haji Abdul Rahman.
[2]  Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez, Colonel Janis Karpinski, and Colonel Thomas Pappas.
[3]  The United States, which is not a named defendant, initially responded on behalf of the defendants in their official capacities and suggested the District of South Carolina as an alternative to the Eastern District of Virginia.