Court Opinion

ID: 4368437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-15 15:36:56.926078+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:32.539207
License: Public Domain

In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                        Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                         No. 07-19-00045-CR

                                ALISHIA MORRIS, APPELLANT

                                                   V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                            On Appeal from the 364th District Court
                                    Lubbock County, Texas
           Trial Court No. 2016-409,491, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding

                                         February 13, 2019

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
                     Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.

        Appellant Alishia Morris, proceeding pro se, appeals the trial court’s order for an

incompetency examination pursuant to article 46B of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.1

          1 On April 13, 2018, we dismissed appellant’s appeal from the trial court’s “Agreed Judgment of

Commitment Following Competency Exam Incompetent But Likely to Regain Competency” for want of
jurisdiction. See Morris v. State, No. 07-18-00061-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 2638 (Tex. App.—Amarillo
Apr. 13, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
       Appellant was indicted for aggravated assault causing bodily injury to a family

member by use of a deadly weapon.2 On January 14, 2019, the trial court issued an

“Amended Order for Examination Regarding Incompetency and Order to Turn Over

Discovery and Order for Protective Order,” appointing an expert to examine appellant to

determine whether she is incompetent to stand trial and directing appellant to submit to

the examination. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 46B.005(a) (West 2018), 46B.021

(West 2018). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal from the order.

       Generally, this court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal

defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d
160, 161 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam). We do not have jurisdiction

to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.

See Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Abbott v. State, 271
S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

       The trial court’s order for an incompetency examination is not a judgment of

conviction. And, there is no statutory or constitutional provision allowing an interlocutory

appeal from the order. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 46B.011 (West 2018)

(“Neither the state nor the defendant is entitled to make an interlocutory appeal relating

to a determination or ruling under Article 46B.005.”); Johnson v. Hays Cty. Dist. Attorney’s

Office, Nos. 03-16-00228-CV, 03-16-00229-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6442, at *1-2

(Tex. App.—Austin June 17, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal from trial

court’s order for an incompetency examination for want of jurisdiction).

       2   TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(b)(1) (West 2011).
                                                   2
      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                      Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                           3