Court Opinion

ID: 7142665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:30:58.414402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:52.068085
License: Public Domain

Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Miller
Reversing.
The appellants, William Hopkins and Henry Hopkins, were convicted of manslaughter, committed in October, 1914, since the present indeterminate sentence law became effective. Ky. Stats. (Ed. 1915), sec. 1136. That statute provides that if the jury find the defendant guilty, they shall fix and render against him an indeterminate sentence or judgment of imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indefinite term, stating in the verdict the minimum and maximum limits thereof, and that the court shall render a judgment in conformity with such verdict.
*296In these cases both appellants were found guilty, but ' the punishment of Will Hopkins was fixed at seven years confinement in the penitentiary, and the punishment of Henry Hopkins was fixed at twenty-one years in the penitentiary.
The judgments followed the verdicts by committing the appellants to confinement in the penitentiary for the periods of seven and twenty-one years, respectively. The defendants appeal.
It needs no explanation or discussion to show that neither the verdicts nor the judgments conform to the statute; and that the ignoring of the statute constituted a reversible error in each case. It was so decided in Biggs v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky., 103; Day v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky., 768; Adams v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 148; Gardner v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 196; Mearns v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 217; Stephens v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 265; Borders v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 344; and in Carroll v. Commonwealth, 164 Ky., 605.
The judgment in each case is reversed and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.