Court Opinion

ID: 4708547
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-03 00:00:23.961525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:00.728582
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10789      Document: 00515961517         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/02/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                                                             August 2, 2021
                                  No. 20-10789                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                                  Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Anthony Orona,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:19-CR-200-1

   Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Orona has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Orona has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10789     Document: 00515961517         Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/02/2021

                                  No. 20-10789

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2