Court Opinion

ID: 845371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 23:01:37.857926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:21.074971
License: Public Domain

720 N.W.2d 749 (2006)
Michael BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, d/b/a Wixom Mobil on the Run, and Robert Pemberton, Defendants-Appellees, and
Debra Salisbury, Defendant.
Docket No. 131036. COA No. 257902.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 15, 2006.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 *750 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address: (1) whether the lower courts erred in ruling that the defendants are entitled to summary disposition on the issue of whether the defendants knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the gasoline pump; and (2) whether the Oakland Circuit Court's ruling that the jury would be instructed that it could infer that the missing videotape would be adverse to the defendants should play any role in the determination of whether summary disposition is warranted under MCR 2.116(C)(10) and, if so, how the adverse inference affects the summary disposition proceedings. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.