Court Opinion

ID: 2923048
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:26:08.402154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:05.697735
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-456-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE: WILLIAM DAVID MICK
__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, William David Mick, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above
cause on August 18, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the
petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself
entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is
denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
								PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 22nd day of August, 2006.
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).