Court Opinion

ID: 899022
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-09 02:11:00.224561+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:34.664542
License: Public Domain

Filed 7/13/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 129

In the Interest of A.S., D.S., F.S., J.S., Jr., and K.S., minor children

Emeline Burkett, 		Petitioner and Appellee

v.

L.S., Mother, J.S., Father,

R.V., Father, B.R., Father, 		Respondents

L.S., Mother,                                                                                                 Appellant

Nos. 20110116-20110120

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas E. Merrick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Fredrick R. Fremgen, State’s Attorney, 511 2nd Ave. SE, Jamestown, ND 58401, for petitioner and appellee.

Erica Shively, Bismarck/Mandan Public Defenders’ Office, 314 E. Thayer Ave., Ste. 200, Bismarck, ND 58501, for appellant.

Interest of A.S., D.S., F.S., J.S., Jr., and K.S.

Nos. 20110116-20110120

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	
L.S. appealed from a juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to her children. L.S. argues the juvenile court’s finding that reasonable efforts were made to reunify her family is clearly erroneous. She also argues the juvenile court’s findings that the conditions and causes of the children’s deprivation are likely to continue and that the children would likely suffer harm absent termination are clearly erroneous. These findings are not clearly erroneous.  We affirm the juvenile court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom