Court Opinion

ID: 7600487
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 07:00:28.438074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:47.585432
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals his revocation of probation and resulting ten year prison sentence. We find no merit in the appellant’s claim that the trial court was without jurisdiction to revoke probation and thus affirm as to the revocation.
On revocation of probation, the trial court in sentencing the appellant departed upward more than one cell based on the appellant’s having had multiple violations of probation. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held that multiple violations of probation are not a proper reason for a guidelines departure. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 284 (Fla.1992). Williams also held, however, that “where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation.” Therefore, the sentence in this case is set aside and the cause remanded for resentencing consistent with Williams. See also O’Keefe v. State, 595 So.2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and BLUE, JJ., concur.