Court Opinion

ID: 5398506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 10:28:32.093879+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:24.744668
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs started this lawsuit by service of a summons and complaint on the corporation and four of the individual defendants on various dates between March 4 and 15, 1954. The defendants so served answered promptly, and the individual defendants demanded an examination of plaintiffs before trial. Plaintiffs also demanded pretrial examination of the defendant New York Central Railroad Company, and have already completed that examination of the corporate defendant, by its president. Now, however, plaintiffs seek to stay defendants from examining them on the ground of prematurity under our recently promulgated rule XI of the Trial Term Rules of New York County.
It is apparent that this litigation was commenced because of the pending proxy fight for control of the defendant railroad. After litigants who instituted the action have themselves sought *74and fully obtained an examination of the corporate defendant before the date of the proxy vote, they are in no position now fairly to complain about the prematurity of their own examination before trial. For them it is too late to claim delay or prematurity. Any other ruling would, in our opinion, be unfair.
We think, however, that items 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the examination should be stricken at this stage of the proceedings, especially in view of other litigation pending, without prejudice, however, to renew the application to examine on such items at an appropriate time.
The orders appealed from should be modified as aforesaid, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, to defendants-respondents.