Court Opinion

ID: 989687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:10:28.613427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:41.989506
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6350

BENJAMIN HENDERSON JONES,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

HOPE DENE HARRIS, Attorney,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-96-134-R)

Submitted:   June 11, 1996                 Decided:   June 25, 1996

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

(West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Harris, No. CA-96-134-R
(W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2