Court Opinion

ID: 2962247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:55:16.697135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:50.103979
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          December 20, 1993     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                              _________________________          No. 93-1530                       SYSTEMS EXPERIENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                             INFORMATION BUILDERS, INC.,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                              _________________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                    [Hon. Hector M. Laffitte, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                              _________________________                                        Before                     Torruella, Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                                 ______________                              _________________________               Patrick D. O'Neill, with whom Martinez, Odell & Calabria was               __________________            __________________________          on brief, for appellant.               Joseph  H. Einstein  with  whom  Irwin  Zemen  and  Goodkind               ___________________              ____________       ________          Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow were on brief, for appellee.          _________________________                              _________________________                              _________________________                    Per  Curiam.   We have  indicated before  that, when  a                    Per  Curiam.                    ___________          district  court produces  a scholarly  opinion  that reaches  the          correct  result, a  reviewing court  should not  write  at length          merely to put  matters in its  own words.  See,  e.g., In re  San                                                     ___   ____  __________          Juan Dupont Plaza  Hotel Fire Litig., 989  F.2d 36, 38 (1st  Cir.          ____________________________________          1993).   So it is here.   We agree with  the court below that, in          this case, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and          that plaintiff's case fails as  a matter of law.  We,  therefore,          summarily affirm the judgment below for substantially the reasons          articulated  in  the  district court's  comprehensive  and  well-          reasoned  rescript,  see   Systems  Experience  Int'l,  Inc.   v.                               ___   _________________________________          Information Builders,  Inc., Civ.  No. 91-1834  (D.P.R. Apr.  15,          ___________________________          1993).          Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.          ________   ___                                          2