Court Opinion

ID: 4468082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-27 21:01:55.032432+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:13.256643
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 18-0684V
                                          UNPUBLISHED

    BONNIE MAHAYNI,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran

                          Petitioner,                           Filed: November 13, 2019
    v.

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
                                                                (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
                         Respondent.                            Related to Vaccine Administration
                                                                (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.

Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.

                                DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

       On May 15, 2018, Bonnie Mahayni filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on
September 7, 2017. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed November 13, 2019, at ¶¶ 2, 4.
Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that
she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and there has
been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result
of her condition. Petition at 1, 5-6; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies petitioner
sustained a Table SIRVA; denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged right

1  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E -
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means it will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invas ion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
shoulder injuries, or any other injury; and further denies that her current disabilities are a
sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

        Nevertheless, on November 13, 2019, the parties filed the attached joint
stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the
stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set
forth therein.

     Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following
compensation:

        A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
        Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
        damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.

       I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of
a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed
to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      2
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                           OFF[CE OF SPECJAL MASTERS

·••*••··••*•*•~*••·-·····
                                               *
BONNIE MAHAYNI,                                •
                                               •
        Petitionor,                            *
                                               Ill

v.                                             "..     No. I S.684V (ECF)
                                                       CHIRP SP.EClAL MASTBR
                                               "       BRIAN H. CORCORAN
SF..CRETARY OF HEALTH                          *
AND HUMAN SERVJCIS,                            •
        Respondent                             *
·•~***~**•*•*~-•~«$¢*~*~•

                                          $'fIPUL~'.n~
       The partie., hereby stipulate to the following mauers:

        I. Pttitionerflled a petition for vaccine compensation undertbe National Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-J0 to 34 (the ..Vaccine Program"). The petition

se&l