Court Opinion

ID: 9719238
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:46:15.066762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:05.375027
License: Public Domain

CONCURRING OPINION
Emmert, J.
I agree with the result reached by the majority opinion, and the construction that the covenant for renewals did not provide for perpetual renewals. However, the lease only provided for renewals to be exercised during the lives of the landlords, the husband being still living at the time the option for renewal was exercised for the term now in litigation. This term .ended April.30, 1949, and since the surviving landlord died January 19, 1948, further options to renew were extinguished.
Note.—Reported in 103 N. E. 2d 199.