Court Opinion

ID: 9674376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:27:55.705157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:27.299555
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
While we did comment on the factual issues as to whether plaintiff was a guest or passenger on the truck, making some observations as to our impression of the evidence and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, we did not intend to hold that as a matter of law under the evidence plaintiff was a passenger.
The tendencies of the evidence presented an issue for the jury to say whether plaintiff while on the truck was a guest or a passenger.
Opinion extended. Application for rehearing overruled.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.