Court Opinion

ID: 8605083
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 02:30:41.978287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:15.176869
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Ramon Antonio Kenan seeks to appeal the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge entered June 13, 2006. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Kenan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.