Court Opinion

ID: 7540728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:26:05.395786+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:51.310081
License: Public Domain

EHRLICH, Justice.
We review the decision of the district court in Jenkins v. State, 448 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) because of direct and express conflict with State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
The facts of the case and issues of law are set forth in the district court decision, which we approve except in one regard. The district court held that the defendant, by failure to object contemporaneously, had waived his right to appeal the trial court’s failure to enter a written order setting forth justification for retaining jurisdiction over one-third of defendant’s sentence. In State v. Snow, 462 So.2d 455 (Fla.1985), this Court held that the rule enunciated in Rhoden is applicable to retention of jurisdiction pursuant to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983). Failure to object at the time of sentencing does not *1069waive the right to appeal the trial court’s failure to strictly comply with the requirements of the statute.
The decision of the district court is approved in part and quashed in part and remanded to the trial court for resentenc-ing in compliance with section 947.16(3).
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.