Court Opinion

ID: 5843624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 23:38:47.545971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:51.138839
License: Public Domain

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of defense counsel’s brief filed pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, *809therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.