Court Opinion

ID: 9536369
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 06:58:34.114219+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:22.513063
License: Public Domain

SCHAUER, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I agree that the modified judgment should be reversed as to Vincent; I would, however, affirm the judgment as to Catherine. She lacked the power to forbid Vincent’s use of the car and, hence, as a matter of law she could not in any legally material sense consent to his use of it. (See Krum v. Malloy *360(1943), 22 Cal.2d 132, 135 [137 P.2d 18]; People v. Forbath (1935), 5 Cal.App.2d Supp. 767, 769 [42 P.2d 108].)