Court Opinion

ID: 5767362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:25:35.46631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:41.324506
License: Public Domain

Memorandum by the Court.
Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term as granted respondent’s motion to stay arbitration pending trial by jury of the question whether claimant’s intestate was an “innocent victim” of an accident involving an unidentified motor vehicle, within the meaning of section 600 of the Insurance Law. It has now been authoritatively determined that by “innocent” is meant “without fault”, in the sense of negligence proximately causing the injury, and hence that a finding thereon is to be made by the arbitrator and not by a court as a condition precedent to arbitration. (Matter of Nagle [MVAIC], 22 N Y 2d 165.) Order, insofar as appealed from, modified, on the law, in accordance herewith, and, as so modified, affirmed, and motion for preliminary trial of question of “ innocent victim ” status denied, with costs to appellant. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.