Court Opinion

ID: 9839367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-12 21:00:45.768538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:33.308294
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1744      Doc: 20         Filed: 09/11/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 21-1744

        AMRO ELSAYED; LOLA SALAMAH,

                            Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                     v.

        FAMILY FARE LLC; M.M. FOWLER INC.; LEE BARNES, JR., Individually and as
        president of Family Fare LLC. and M.M. Fowler Inc.; DONALD PILCHER, Individually,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
        Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, Catherine C. Eagles, District Judges; L. Patrick Auld,
        Magistrate Judge. (1:18-cv-01045-CCE-LPA)

        Submitted: June 29, 2023                                    Decided: September 11, 2023

        Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Amro Elsayed, Lola Salamah, Appellants Pro Se. William Sutton Cherry, III, Jessica Blair
        Vickers, MANNING, FULTON & SKINNER, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1744      Doc: 20         Filed: 09/11/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Amro Elsayed and Lola Salamah appeal several of the district court’s orders entered

        in this action which alleged claims arising out of the termination of a franchise agreement.

        We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

        district court’s orders. Elsayed v. Family Fare LLC, No. 1:18-cv-01045-CCE-LPA,

        (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2020; Aug. 10, 2020; Aug. 25, 2020; Feb. 9, 2021; June 4, 2021). We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     2