Court Opinion

ID: 575445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:23.253584
License: Public Domain

953 F.2d 637
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Dwayne Robinson BOLLING, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.D. SMITH, Warden;  Bobby Soles;  Captain Barksdale;Lieutenant Yates;  Sergeant Staten;  M.A. Shupe;Ms. McCoy, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7690.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 1992.Decided Jan. 31, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-91-384-R)
Dwayne Robinson Bolling, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Dwayne Robinson Bolling appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Bolling v. Smith, No. CA-91-384-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 17, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.