Court Opinion

ID: 6795655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 01:27:02.927404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:05.922873
License: Public Domain

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237, 934 N.E.2d 913, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.
Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.