Court Opinion

ID: 2959012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 03:10:27.125689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:49.519694
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-11-00317-CR

                                   Bennie Fuelberg, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY, 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. CR01015, HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                                            ORDER

PER CURIAM

               We abated this appeal and remanded this cause for a new hearing, with instructions to

address whether, under an objective reasonable-person standard, the Honorable Judge Daniel H. Mills

(1) was disqualified as an injured party from hearing this case or (2) should have been recused

because his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. See Fuelberg v. State, 410 S.W.3d 498,

510–11 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.). The district court has since filed a supplemental clerk’s

record with an order concluding that Judge Mills was not disqualified and should not have been

recused. This appeal is reinstated.

               We request supplemental briefings from the parties on the limited issue of whether

the district court erred in concluding that Judge Mills should not have been disqualified or recused.
The appellant should file his brief no later than February 6, 2014. The State’s response will be due

within thirty (30) days of the filing of the appellant’s brief.

                It is so ordered this 7th day of January 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Do Not Publish

                                                   2