Court Opinion

ID: 2963942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:17:47.425236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:25.789534
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          February 22, 1996
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1470

                                  THOMAS R. MCNELL,
                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                  MAX HUGEL, ET AL.,
                                Defendants, Appellees.
                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________
                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________
                           Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges. 
                                           ______________
                                 ____________________

            Thomas R. McNell on brief pro se.
            ________________
            Gary  M. Burt  and  Wiggin &  Nourie on  brief  for  appellees Max
            _____________       ________________
        Hugel, Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, Joseph Millimet, Esquire, and
        Matthias J. Reynolds, Esquire.
            William L.  Chapman, Cordell A. Johnston,  Orr and  Reno, Katie A.
            ___________________  ___________________   _____________  ________
        Gummer and McCarter & English on brief for appellee Asbury Park Press.
        ______     __________________
            Wilbur A. Glahn,  III, McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, Andrew
            _____________________  ___________________________________  ______
        L.  Sandler, Katharine R. Stollman and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
        ___________  _____________________     _______________________________
        Flom on brief for appellee Paul L. Perito, Esquire.
        ____

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and
                 ___________

            the  record  on  appeal.   We  affirm  the  district  court's

            judgment of dismissal, essentially  for the reasons stated in

            its orders  of May  16, 1994,  July 19, 1994,  and March  31,

            1995.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________

                 Appellant's  motion  for  leave to  file  a supplemental

            appendix is granted.
                        ________

                 Appellant's "Rule  60(B)(4)(5) & (6) motion  for summary

            judgment in vacating default judgment obtained in  a fraud on

            the court in Hugel v. McNell litigation" is denied.
                         _____    ______                _______

                 The  motions  filed by  appellee  Asbury  Park Press  to

            strike appellant's  (1) objection  to its motion  for summary

            dismissal and (2) reply brief are denied as moot.
                                              _______________

                                         -3-