Court Opinion

ID: 890923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-05 15:34:34.86425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:02.653689
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                      Docket No. 37687

STATE OF IDAHO,                                )     2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 730
                                               )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                   )     Filed: December 2, 2010
                                               )
v.                                             )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                               )
DAYLE S. WESTRA,                               )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                               )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                    )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                               )

       Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Bonner County. Hon. Steven C. Verby, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum
       period of confinement of two and one-half years, for lewd conduct with a minor
       child under sixteen years of age, affirmed.

       Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                   ______________________________________________

                    Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
                                and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Dayle S. Westra pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen years of
age. I.C. § 18-1508. In exchange for Westra’s guilty plea, the state agreed to recommend a
unified life sentence, with a minimum period of confinement of ten years. The district court
sentenced Westra to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of
two and one-half years. Westra appeals.
       Westra sexually abused his stepdaughter, M.B. for approximately nine years, beginning
when M.B. was three years old. Westra forced M.B. to perform oral sex on him, ejaculated in
her mouth, tied her to the bed with cargo straps, and anally and vaginally raped her. He video

                                              1
recorded M.B. as he raped her, told her he would kill her if she disclosed the abuse, and if she
screamed he put a sock or something in her mouth. M.B. was almost twelve years of age when
she finally disclosed the abuse to her mother, after having made a plan to run away from home.
M.B. underwent a sexual assault examination at the hospital, which revealed evidence of recent
anal penetration, evidence of recent perivaginal contact, and evidence of past hymenal
penetration--all findings that corroborated the history of ongoing sexual abuse. M.B.’s mother
advised that Westra had genital herpes and subsequent test results indicated that M.B. also tested
positive for herpes and hepatitis C.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007).
       The issue before this Court is not whether the sentence is one that we would have
imposed, but whether the sentence is plainly excessive under any reasonable view of the facts.
Toohill, 103 Idaho at 568, 650 P.2d at 710. Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case,
we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Westra’s judgment of
conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                2