Court Opinion

ID: 2904886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:32:21.448091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:34.376765
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-04-214 CV

____________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF DANIEL SANCHEZ

On Appeal from the 359th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 03-08-06085-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)
	We received notice of appeal filed April 21, 2004.  We notified the parties that the
notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed.  In his response, the appellant
conceded that the motion for new trial was not filed within thirty days of judgment.  The
judgment was signed on February 5, 2004.  No motion for new trial was timely filed.  A
notice of appeal was filed on April 21, 2004, more than 30 days from the date the
judgment was signed and outside the period of time for which an extension of time to file
notice of appeal may be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3.  The Court finds
appellant failed to timely perfect an appeal.  The Court further finds that it lacks
jurisdiction over this appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.	
 
								PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered August 12, 2004 
Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.
1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.