Court Opinion

ID: 4519873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-26 20:00:30.305967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:51:32.350363
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-13870   Date Filed: 03/26/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-13870
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-20251-CMA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

KENNETH JOHNSON,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (March 26, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-13870     Date Filed: 03/26/2020   Page: 2 of 2

      Stuart Adelstein, appointed counsel for Kenneth Johnson in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2