Court Opinion

ID: 1004289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:56.102482+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:31.744664
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6054

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JANICE SYLVIA STEELE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CR-98-22, CA-00-510-3)

Submitted:   April 24, 2001                    Decided:   May 2, 2001

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janice Sylvia Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Janice Sylvia Steele seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Steele, Nos. CR-98-22;

CA-00-510-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 7, 2000; entered Nov. 8, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2