Court Opinion

ID: 9760271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 00:45:22.004778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:10.061454
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Our opinion overruling appellant’s first motion for rehearing is withdrawn. City’s second motion for rehearing insists that we should judicially know the terms of the *949City Charter, wherein it provides: “Any person in the classified civil service who has not completed the probationary period or who is serving under provisional or temporary appointment may be suspended, reduced in pay or class, or removed at any time by the City Manager or other officer having power to appoint. Notice of such action shall be given to the Personnel Director.”
After judicially knowing that provision of the Charter, there is still no proof that it applies to Condie. There was no proof that the office manager of the Tax Office is a person in the classified civil service to whom the charter provision would apply. We are not -required to judicially know the Personnel Rules, and, as discussed in the opinion, the record does not show that the trial court excluded them, and, if it did, upon what objections. City does not bring Condie within the terms of the Charter provision relied upon.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.