Court Opinion

ID: 7822306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:58:59.405026+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:46.122212
License: Public Domain

Frank Holt, Justice, concurring. I would affirm based on the undisputed evidence that the sign in question adversely affects the safety of the traveling public. In City of Fayetteville v. S & H, Inc., 261 Ark. 148, 547 S. W.2d 94 (1977), we recognized that the city, through its police power, may validly require the removal of a sign where it is inimical to traffic safety. See also Fayetteville Bd. of Adj. v. Osage Oil, 258 Ark. 91, 522 S.W.2d 836 (1975). Purtle, J., joins in this concurrence.