Court Opinion

ID: 9892335
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-23 17:01:18.347036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:04:40.435776
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-13002    Document: 42-1     Date Filed: 10/23/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-13002
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       YURI MAIKEL HERNANDEZ PEREZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Alabama
                    D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-00039-JB-B-2
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-13002     Document: 42-1      Date Filed: 10/23/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                22-13002

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Arthur J. Madden III, appointed counsel for Yuri Maikel Her-
       nandez Perez in this appeal following his convictions on one count
       of conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of methampheta-
       mine and one count of possession with intent to distribute more
       than 50 grams of methamphetamine, and his resultant total sen-
       tence of 85 months’ imprisonment, has filed a motion to withdraw
       on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. Cal-
       ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
       record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to with-
       draw is GRANTED, and Perez’s convictions and sentences are
       AFFIRMED.