Court Opinion

ID: 9633543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 11:51:28.799766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:08:36.876026
License: Public Domain

CONCURRING OPINION OF
MIZUHA, J.
I concur only in the result since I am in total disagreement with that portion of the opinion of the court which holds that the use of a mathematical or per diem formula in argument of counsel is improper. Since nothing could be added to the numerous opinions in other jurisdictions which are against the “Botta rule,” I deem it unnecessary to do more than state my conclusion.
I concur with Justice Lewis that Defendant’s Requested Instruction No. 25 was properly refused by the trial court since there was no evidence to show that plaintiff’s neck and shoulder pain would have been alleviated by further medical care.