Court Opinion

ID: 565528
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:12:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:41.795545
License: Public Domain

940 F.2d 653Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William SPRATLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NICHOLSON, Sheriff, Deputy McGinnis, Deputy Moody,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7569.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 1991.Decided Aug. 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.  (CA-90-104-AM)
William Spratley, appellant pro se.
Archer Lafayette Yeatts, III, Maloney, Yeatts & Barr, P.C., Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
William Spratley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Spratley v. Nicholson, CA-90-104-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 20, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.