Court Opinion

ID: 3555822
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:06:53.932826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:46.735577
License: Public Domain

It would serve no useful purpose to comment upon evidence such as appears in this case.
The defendants' motions and requests were properly denied. Lyman v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 200, 204; Foss v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 256, 260; Felch v. Railroad, 66 N.H. 318, 320, 322, 323; Boothby v. Railway, 66 N.H. 342; Walker v. Railroad, 64 N.H. 414; Paine v. Railway, 63 N.H. 623; Merrill v. Express Co., 62 N.H. 514; Nutter v. Railroad, 60 N.H. 483, 485; Tuttle v. Farmington, *Page 209 58 N.H. 13, 14; Griffin v. Auburn, 58 N.H. 121, 134; Paine v. Railway,58 N.H. 611; Gilman v. Noyes, 57 N.H. 627; Sleeper v. Sandown, 52 N.H. 244; Cheshire Railroad v. Foster, 51 N.H. 490, 493; Page v. Parker, 43 N.H. 363; Palmer v. Portsmouth, 43 N.H. 365.
Exceptions overruled.
WALLACE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.