Court Opinion

ID: 8676356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:20:59.390078+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.206926
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas C. Charnock, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for injunctive relief and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00229-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. July 29, 2014). We also deny Charnoek’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.