Court Opinion

ID: 9418071
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:07:22.961101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:34.227595
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Harlan
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case does not differ, in principle or in its facts, from Pettibone v. Nichols, just decided. Moyer was also charged with the murder of Steunenberg, and was arrested in Colorado, Upon the warrant of the Governor of that'State, and taken to Idaho, and delivered to its authorities. He was embraced in the same indictment with Pettibone, and was held in custody for trial under that indictment. He sued out a writ of habeas ,corpus from the Supreme Court of Idaho, but the writ was *222dismissed by that court, Ex parte Moyer, 85 Pac. 897, and a writ of error has been prosecuted to this court. That is case No. 266 on our present docket. He then sued out a writ of habeas corpus from the Circuit Court of the Unitéd States, and his discharge being .refused by the court, he prosecuted the present appeal.
For the reason stated in Pettibone’s case,'the final order is

Affirmed.