Court Opinion

ID: 8476962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:18:45.273052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:27.029897
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dino Marcellus Giles appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Giles, No. 1:94-cr-00212WMN-1 (D.Md. Aug. 7, 2008); see United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 321, 175 L.Ed.2d 212 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.