Court Opinion

ID: 8608965
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:20:25.275938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.935991
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Martin Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. *192§ 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Virginia, No. 2:06-cv-00723-RBS (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 4, 2007; entered Jan. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.