Court Opinion

ID: 5112638
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 16:33:20.153828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:39.257304
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this original proceeding, we denied mandamus relief in an opinion and a judgment dated December 12, 2012. In re State ex rel Weeks, 392 S.W.3d 280, 2012 WL 6218205 (Tex.App.-Waco 2012, orig. proceeding). Relator then sought mandamus relief in the Court of Criminal Appeals.
In an opinion dated January 16, 2013, the Court of Criminal Appeals conditionally granted mandamus relief and ordered us “to grant mandamus relief directing Judge Keeling to submit the § 7.02(a)(2) theory of party liability in the jury charge and to submit the § 7.02(b) theory without requiring the State to show that Falk should have anticipated the particular method by which the murder was carried out.” In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 125-26, (Tex.Crim.App.2013) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we vacate our December 12, 2012 judgment. We conditionally grant mandamus relief and order Respondent “to submit the § 7.02(a)(2) theory of party liability in the jury charge and to submit the § 7.02(b) theory [in the jury charge] without requiring the State to show that Falk should have anticipated the particular method by which the murder was carried out.” Id. The writ of manda*340mus will issue only in the event that Respondent fails to comply with this order.