Court Opinion

ID: 4105373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-07 21:05:33.742648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:47:46.387174
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                       ATLANTA,____________________
                                                November 30, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0601. TRAVIS JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

      In 2010, Travis Johnson pled guilty to armed robbery, robbery, and possession
of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court imposed a 20-year
sentence on the conviction for armed robbery, a consecutive 20-year sentence on the
conviction for robbery, and a consecutive 5-year sentence on the conviction for
possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. In September 2016,
Johnson filed a motion to vacate or correct void sentence, which the trial court
denied. He now appeals. We lack jurisdiction.
      A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a
void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in
fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg
v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void
sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and
validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not
authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment
for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,
572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). When a sentence is within the statutory range of
punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      Johnson argued in his motion to vacate or correct void sentence that the trial
court lacked the authority to impose the sentence on his robbery conviction because
that conviction should have merged into his armed robbery conviction. Johnson’s
merger claim is a challenge to his convictions, not his sentences, and thus does not
state a valid void-sentence claim. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 193-194 (695
SE2d 244) (2010).
      Because Johnson has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack
jurisdiction to consider his appeal. See Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2). Moreover, to the
extent that Johnson’s motion could be construed as seeking to vacate or modify his
convictions, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an
appropriate remedy in a criminal case,” id. at 218 (1), and any appeal from an order
denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id. at 218 (2); see also
Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010).
      For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        11/30/2016
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.