Court Opinion

ID: 1004653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:44:20.402398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:13.711890
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6363

ALEXANDER S. ROUNDTREE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DOUG CATOE, Director; CHARLES M. CONDON, At-
torney General of the State of South Carolina,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-848-0-24BD)

Submitted:   May 31, 2001                  Decided:   June 11, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander S. Roundtree, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alexander S. Roundtree seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).       We have reviewed the record and the

district   court’s   opinion   accepting   the   recommendation   of   the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error.          Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court.       Roundtree v. Catoe, No. CA-00-

848-0-24BD (D.S.C. filed Jan. 30, 2001; entered Feb. 1, 2001).          We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                              DISMISSED

                                   2