Court Opinion

ID: 4278579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-25 16:03:25.224475+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:25.500322
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                         Nos. 1D16-5248
                              1D16-5249
                  (Consolidated for disposition)
                 _____________________________

LARRY C. GOODMAN,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                  ___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Mark Borello, Judge.

                          May 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

     AFFIRMED. See Sheppard v. State, 17 So. 3d 275, 286-87 (Fla.
2009) (agreeing that a trial court may strike pro se rule 3.170(l)
motion as a nullity unless the motion “contains specific
allegations that give rise to an adversarial relationship, such as
misadvice, affirmative misrepresentations, or coercion that led to
the entry of the plea”); Echeverria v. State, 33 So. 3d 802, 804
(Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that a defendant’s “broad, general
allegations of ineffectiveness of his counsel do not indicate
misadvice, coercion, or misrepresentation that would require a
hearing under Sheppard.”).

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
               _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox,
Assistant Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant
Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

                             2