Court Opinion

ID: 4304595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-16 19:45:07.076971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:03:01.008884
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                              TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                       No. 10-18-00255-CR

CALEB GIPSON,
                                                                       Appellant
    v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                                       Appellee

                                From the 12th District Court
                                  Madison County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 17-12896

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Caleb Gipson appeals two judgments rendered on two counts in one trial court

case number. The judgments were rendered, and the sentences were imposed, on April

11, 2018. Gipson timely filed a motion for new trial and was required to file his notice of

appeal within 90 days after the day the sentences were imposed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(2). His notice of appeal1 was filed on July 18, 2018, 98 days after the sentences

were imposed.        Thus, Gipson’s notice of appeal is untimely. See id. We have no

1
 Gipson filed a notice of appeal for each count which this Court has consolidated into one appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 12.2(c) (“All notices of appeal filed in the same case must be given the same docket number.”).
jurisdiction of an untimely appeal, and this appeal must be dismissed. See Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of

appeal is untimely).2

        Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.3

                                                    TOM GRAY
                                                    Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Davis, and
       Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed August 15, 2018
Do not publish
[CR25]

2
 No motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal has been filed with the Court. A motion filed
now would not be beneficial to Gipson because when a notice of appeal is filed within the 15-day deadline,
such as in this case, but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction
to consider the appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522, 523
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

3
 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for
discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after
either the day this Court's judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was
overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).

Gipson v. State                                                                                          Page 2