Court Opinion

ID: 4208582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-03 15:16:07.317603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:08.950633
License: Public Domain

People v Habersham (2017 NY Slip Op 06886)

People v Habersham

2017 NY Slip Op 06886

Decided on October 3, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

3951/14 4549 4548

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vGuinevere Habersham, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered October 28, 2015, as amended February 3, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 3, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.