Court Opinion

ID: 4179182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-20 18:04:03.489019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:55.781549
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-40934      Document: 00514039657         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/20/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 16-40934                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      June 20, 2017
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO ARCE-ORDONES,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:16-CR-129-1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Arce-Ordones
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arce-Ordones has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Arce-Ordones’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40934   Document: 00514039657   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/20/2017

                              No. 16-40934

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.     Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

                                    2