Court Opinion

ID: 4150501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-07 14:01:02.112317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:39.734866
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-11126   Date Filed: 03/07/2017   Page: 1 of 2

                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 15-11126
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 9:06-cr-80038-DTKH-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

ADRIAN CHAVERS,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (March 7, 2017)

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
              Case: 15-11126    Date Filed: 03/07/2017   Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

      Adrian Chavers appeals the district court’s denial of his motion -- based on

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines -- to reduce his sentence, pursuant to

§ 3582(c)(2). The district court correctly concluded that Chavers was ineligible for

a sentence reduction. Amendment 782 did not lower his guidelines range.

Amendment 782 only impacts on the guideline ranges under § 2D1.1(c). Chavers

was sentenced using the guideline provisions in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(d), § 2A1.1, and

§ 5G1.2(a).

      AFFIRMED.

                                         2