Court Opinion

ID: 1791133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:27:17.473804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:50.600595
License: Public Domain

211 S.W.3d 165 (2007)
Movina SMITH, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 87602.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
January 9, 2007.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Movina Smith, appeals the motion court's order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order denying the movant's Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).