Court Opinion

ID: 9852064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:23:51.556663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:21.596221
License: Public Domain

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:
It has come to our attention that in our opinion of February 1, 1977, we failed to consider the appellant’s Proposition VI which was a request for a remittitur of the interest on the additional income tax.
Because of the closeness of that determinative question of law involved, we have decided to allow the request for remittitur of the interest and it is so ordered. Rogers v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Oki., 466 P.2d 650; 68 O.S.1971, § 220.
*632DAVISON, IRWIN, BERRY, BARNES, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.
HODGES, C. J., dissents.