Court Opinion

ID: 4431493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-21 07:04:40.148472+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:50:33.570383
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  August 13, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0849. DWAYNE ADGAR et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA.

      The City of Atlanta initiated condemnation proceedings against property
owners Dwayne and Arnold Adgar. In October 2016, the trial court condemned the
property at issue and ordered the Adgars to surrender possession. Thereafter, the
Adgars filed a motion to enjoin the City from taking possession, and in August 2017,
the trial court entered an injunction, permitting the Adgars to remain on the property
pending the outcome of the proceedings. The City filed a motion to reconsider and
modify the injunction, and on December 19, 2017, the trial court ruled that its
injunction was “overly broad,” granted the City’s motion for reconsideration, and
ordered the Adgars to vacate the property within 60 days and obtain liability
insurance on the property.1 The Adgars filed a timely notice of appeal from the
December 19, 2017 order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4), “[a]ll judgments or orders granting or
refusing applications for receivers or for interlocutory or final injunctions” are subject
to direct appeal. However, unlike orders granting or refusing injunctions, “orders
modifying or dissolving interlocutory injunctions are appealable only on an
interlocutory basis pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).” Jones v. Peach Trader Inc., 302
Ga. 504, 511 (III) (807 SE2d 840) (2017). Here, the December 19, 2017 order
modified and partially dissolved the previous injunction. As such, the Adgars were
required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure, and their failure to do so

      1
        In the same order, the trial court also disbursed to inter alia, Bank of America,
N.A., a portion of the condemnation proceeds to satisfy its interest in the property.
deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

                                     Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                            Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                      08/13/2019
                                            I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                     the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                            Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                     hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                     , Clerk.