Court Opinion

ID: 1024332
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:32:02.559951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:11.558869
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to modify restitution payments and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Crockett,
  
  No. 7:98-cr00798-GRA, 2007 WL 914232 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 22, 2007 & entered Mar. 23, 2007); (June 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.