Court Opinion

ID: 7822024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:58:12.948599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:45.662948
License: Public Domain

Darrell Hickman, Justice, concurring. I concur in the decision because the names in this case were identical. That is, Frank Smith conceded that he was the prisoner and that is the name of the person demanded. In such a case a presumption exists that must be rebutted. Lindley v. Crider, 223 Ark. 200, 265 S.W. 2d 498 (1954); In Re: Extradition of D’Amico, 177 F. Supp. 648 (D.C. N.Y. 1959); Fernandez v. Phillips, 268 U.S. 311 (1925).