Court Opinion

ID: 1006470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:11:57.787807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:51.305427
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7669

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.   C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
(CR-94-297, CA-98-2795-4-12)

Submitted:   January 17, 2002             Decided:   January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Patrick Lamar Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion.   We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

United Stats v. Harris, Nos. CR-94-297; CA-98-2795-4-12 (D.S.C.

Aug. 17, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2