Court Opinion

ID: 3554826
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:06:13.107862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:33.003138
License: Public Domain

The plaintiffs, who are the owners of a tract of land in Crawford's Purchase, claim to recover of the estate of Sylvester Marsh a former owner, and the grantor with covenants of warranty of the plaintiffs' grantor, expenses incurred in a proceeding instituted by them to annul a tax deed of Crawford's Purchase and Chandler's Purchase, given upon a sale for taxes assessed against Marsh previous to the conveyance by him to the grantor of the plaintiffs. It appears that the suit to set aside the tax deed was instituted without notice to Marsh, and that neither he in his lifetime, nor his representative since his decease, was a party or was notified to become a party to it, and that the suit was settled by agreement of the parties by a decree that the tax deed be annulled and cancelled, and that no costs should be allowed to either party. Upon these facts the plaintiffs' claim cannot be sustained. It does not appear that there was any incumbrance upon the land when the action was commenced. The validity of the adverse tax title has never been established in any way, and Marsh's estate cannot be charged with the costs and expenses of a suit commenced, prosecuted, and settled without direction or *Page 532 
authority from him. Under these circumstances it is unnecessary to consider whether under any circumstances the plaintiffs could have maintained an action upon the covenants contained in Marsh's deed to their grantor.
Judgment for the defendant.
ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.