Court Opinion

ID: 8462646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:32:23.729538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.672226
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Jerome Pigford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pigford, No. 7:00-cr-00133-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.