Court Opinion

ID: 2964644
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:28:48.194226+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:07.729398
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            United States Court of Appeals
                                For the First Circuit
                                 ____________________

          No. 96-2070

                          MANCHESTER SECURITY SERVICE, INC.,

                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

                    CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, ETC., ET AL.,

                               Defendants - Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________

                          Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                _____________________

               Andrew D. Dunn,  with whom Devine,  Millimet & Branch,  P.A.
               ______________             _________________________________
          was on brief for appellant.
               Louis M.  Rohrberg, with whom  Rohrberg & Associates  was on
               __________________             _____________________
          brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                    April 24, 1997
                                 ____________________

                    Per  Curiam.  Upon review  of the briefs  and record in
                    Per  Curiam.
                    ___________

          this  case,  we affirm  the decision  of  the district  court for

          substantially  the  same  reasons  stated in  its  opinion  dated

          August 28, 1996.

                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellees.
                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellees.
                    ________________________________________

                                         -2-