Court Opinion

ID: 3104011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:34:01.664273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:44:39.403883
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                  EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                   §
 BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE,                                              No. 08-11-00100-CV
                                                   §
                         Appellant,                                     Appeal from
                                                   §
 v.                                                                  112th District Court
                                                   §
 WARDEN II DAVID SWEETIN,                                        of Crockett County, Texas
 INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY,                              §
 ASSISTANT WARDEN RICHARD
 GUNNELS, and WILLIAM C. HAMAN,                    §

                         Appellees.

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

        This case is before the Court on our own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we will dismiss.

        Appellant, who is imprisoned, attempted to file a pleading in the district court. Although the

nature of the pleading is not entirely clear, it appears that Appellant alleged that prison officials had

committed intentional torts against him. The district court clerk responded by letter, stating that she

diligently searched her records, but was “unable to locate any previous criminal filings in this county

on you.” The clerk advised Appellant to file his “petition” in the county where he was sentenced.

There is no indication that the clerk filed Appellant’s pleading. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

        The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that there does not appear to be an appealable

order, and that the Court therefore intended to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless any

party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. Although Appellant responded to the Clerk’s
notice, the response is incomprehensible.

         This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders.

Cantu Servs., Inc. v. United Freedom Assocs., Inc., 329 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, no

pet.). In this case, there is no order from which Appellant may appeal. See Moody v. Spivey, No.

06-10-00066-CV, 2010 WL 3450351, at *1 (Tex.App.--Texarkana Sept. 3, 2010, no pet.)(mem.

op.)(dismissing appeal because no order had been entered by the trial court). Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.1

May 11, 2011
                                                                ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

        1
           W hen a district clerk refuses to file a pleading, the proper remedy is a writ of mandamus from the district
court. In re Bernard, 993 S.W .2d 453, 454 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding)(O’Connor, J.,
concurring).