Court Opinion

ID: 9420776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:55:57.108447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:27.026941
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The controlling claim in this case is that there was an unreasonable search and seizure of evidence, the admission of which vitiated the convictions. Before determining these issues conflicting views as to the facts in this case and the inferences to be drawn from them would have to be resolved. The Solicitor General confesses error and asks that the judgment below should be reversed as to all the petitioners, leaving of course the way open for a new trial. To accept in this case his confession of error would not involve the establishment of any precedent.
Accordingly we reverse the judgment as to all the petitioners. „ ,
„ Reversed.