Court Opinion

ID: 9464399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 23:31:56.605336+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:38:36.044743
License: Public Domain

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge
dissenting:
I would reverse this case and remand it to the district court with directions to remand the factual issue to the trustees, following the rule of Danti v. Lewis (D.C.Cir. 1962) 312 F.2d 345, 349-50. I cannot join in my brothers’ conclusion that the trustees could have reached only one conclusion about Hicks’ disqualification under the language of Plan I. Especially is this true because Hicks alleged, and offered evidence to prove that the trustees had reached a contrary conclusion in respect of others who were identically situated to him.