Court Opinion

ID: 9831343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:00:53.064783+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:33.814670
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128      Doc: 13         Filed: 08/31/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                                 No. 23-6128

        JERITON LAVAR CURRY,

                             Petitioner - Appellant,

                      v.

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Respondent - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:22-cv-00180-MOC)

        Submitted: August 29, 2023                                        Decided: August 31, 2023

        Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jeriton Lavar Curry, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128      Doc: 13        Filed: 08/31/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Jeriton Lavar Curry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

        § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings clause

        in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.     We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Curry v. United States, No. 3:22-cv-

        00180-MOC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2022). ∗ We deny Curry’s pending motions. We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

              ∗
                 Curry filed his notice of appeal on December 12, 2022, more than 60 days after
        the district court dismissed his petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). However, the
        court did not enter its final order until March 27, 2023, when it denied Curry’s pending
        motion to amend. Accordingly, we conclude that Curry’s notice of appeal was timely. See
        Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2).

                                                    2