Court Opinion

ID: 2940838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 22:12:42.057235+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:28.374278
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-75,868 & AP-75,869

EX PARTE AARON JAMES HALL, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 915388-A AND 920802-A IN THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

 Per curiam.
 
O P I N I O N

	Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus.  Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).  Applicant was convicted of murder and
conspiracy to possess with intent to deliver 400 grams or more of cocaine and sentenced to sixty-five
and thirty years' imprisonment, respectively.  The First Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. 
Hall v. State, 137 S.W.3d 847 (Tex. App. - Houston 2004, pet ref'd).
	Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because
counsel failed to know the law concerning use of a prior juvenile conviction for enhancement and
caused a plea of "true" to be entered to a juvenile conviction that was unavailable for enhancement.
	The trial court has determined that trial counsel's performance was deficient and that this
deficient performance prejudiced Applicant.  The trial court recommends that relief be granted in
the form of new punishment proceedings.  This recommendation is supported by the record.
	Habeas corpus relief is granted.  The sentences in cause numbers 915388 and 920802 from
the 228th District Court of Harris County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of
the Sheriff of Harris County for new punishment proceedings.

Delivered: March 19, 2008
Do Not Publish