Court Opinion

ID: 996905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:57:33.971923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:23.320283
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6823

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GUY ANTHONY DILLARD,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-173, CA-97-589-R)

Submitted:   November 5, 1998          Decided:     November 19, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Anthony Dillard, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Guy Anthony Dillard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Dillard v. United States, Nos. CR-93-

173; CA-97-589-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1998). We deny Dillard’s motion

for reconsideration of his motion to remand and stay the case. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2