Court Opinion

ID: 8439789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:38:21.240641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.590468
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jovan Jordan appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jordan, No. 3:05-cr-00486-HEH-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.