Court Opinion

ID: 1023874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:44:48.342505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:41.130023
License: Public Domain

Filed: October 3, 2007

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 07-6503
                           (1:06-cv-00683)

DAVID T. FELDER,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

           versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director,
Virginia Department of Corrections,
                                                Respondent - Appellee.

                              O R D E R

     The court amends its opinion filed September 14, 2007, as

follows:

     On the cover sheet, district court information, the case

number is corrected to read “1:06-cv-00683).”

                                For the Court

                                /s/ Patricia S. Connor
                                ____________________________
                                            Clerk
                            UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 07-6503

DAVID T. FELDER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00683)

Submitted:   September 7, 2007        Decided:   September 14, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David T. Felder, Appellant Pro Se.      Virginia Bidwell Theisen,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           David T. Felder seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.              The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability.        28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).          A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                 28 U.S.C.

§   2253(c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner   satisfies      this   standard    by

demonstrating    that   reasonable     jurists   would     find   that     any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable.        Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).          We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Felder has not

made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny Felder’s motion

for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                  We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                 - 2 -