Court Opinion

ID: 4316013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-27 14:55:18.420437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:10:13.637104
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                             ____________________
                                NO. 09-18-00197-CV
                             ____________________

                            GEERT VISSER, Appellant

                                           V.

             AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                ______________

                     On Appeal from the 284th District Court
                          Montgomery County, Texas
                        Trial Cause No. 17-05-05869-CV
________________________________________________________                _____________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Geert Visser appealed from a judgment signed May 2, 2018. On July 2, 2018,

we notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to the appellant’s

failure to pay or, to arrange to pay the District Clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. Further, the notice warned Visser that the appeal would be dismissed for

want of prosecution unless he established that the fee had been paid or additional

time was needed. On August 10, 2018, we notified Visser that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless he filed a suggestion of bankruptcy that

                                           1
complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.1 on or before August 20, 2018.

No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                             ________________________________
                                                     STEVE McKEITHEN
                                                         Chief Justice

Submitted on September 26, 2018
Opinion Delivered September 27, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                         2