Court Opinion

ID: 8617112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 08:26:16.7476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:25.951103
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
The immigration judge properly denied cancellation of removal because petitioners lack any qualifying relatives under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A). Petitioners have cited no authority for their equal protection argument, and Fiallo v. Bell1 and Ram v. INS2 foreclose it.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Fiallo v. Bell, 430 U.S. 787, 794, 97 S.Ct. 1473, 52 L.Ed.2d 50 (1977).

. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir.2001).