Court Opinion

ID: 3124847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:00:07.092046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:21.933992
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-09-00697-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
SHINER MOSELEY AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. 
AND HDR ENGINEERING,
INC.,                                                Appellants,
 
                                                             v.
 
W.O.H. ENTERPRISES,
L.L.C.,                                                    Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
 
                     On
appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
                                       of
Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
      Before Chief
Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellants,
Shiner Moseley and Associates, Inc. and HDR Engineering, Inc., perfected an
appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County,
Texas, in cause number 08-62284-3.  Appellants have filed an agreed motion to
dismiss the appeal with prejudice on grounds that the parties have reached an
agreement to settle and compromise their differences.  Appellants request that
this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ agreed motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). 
Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are
taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the
parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having
dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
13th day of May, 2010.