Court Opinion

ID: 566612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:12:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:26.638161
License: Public Domain

941 F.2d 1207
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Sterling THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Richard A. LANHAM, Acting Commissioner, John Himmel, QueenieStoops, Kenneth Taylor, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6603.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 1991.Decided Aug. 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Joseph C. Howard, District Judge.  (CA-91-123-JH)
Sterling Thornton, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Sterling Thornton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Thornton v. Lanham, CA-91-123-JH (D.Md. May 31, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.