Court Opinion

ID: 3081306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:56:50.470953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:51.850154
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                             FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                              ORDER

Appellate case name:       Lamar Marcell Hunter v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number:     01-14-00895-CR

Trial court case number: 12-CR-1921

Trial court:               10th District Court of Galveston County

        Appellant, Lamar Marcell Hunter, has filed an agreed motion to abate the appeal to
correct the certification of his right to appeal. Appellant pleaded guilty, without an agreed
recommendation as to punishment, to the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child.
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2014). The trial court conducted a punishment
hearing, found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault, and assessed punishment at
confinement for twenty years. The trial court executed a certification of appellant’s right to
appeal, indicating that this is not a plea-bargain case and appellant has the right to appeal
“punishment only.” By his motion, appellant contends that the record does not reflect any
bargain with the State in exchange for his guilty plea and, thus, his appeal is not limited to
“punishment only.” Appellant’s motion states that the State agrees that there was no bargain in
exchange for the guilty plea and includes a certificate of conference stating that the State agrees
to the motion.1
        The certification of right to appeal states that the case is not a plea bargain case but also
states that appellant has a right to appeal “punishment only.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2)
(setting out limitations only on plea-bargained case); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02
(West 2006). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an amended trial court’s
certification of the right to appeal correcting a defect or omission may be filed in the appellate
court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f), 34.5(c), 37.1. Further, when we have a record, we are

1
       The Written Plea Admonishments-Waivers-Stipulations that appellant executed state that
       he waives “the 30 days provided in which to file a Motion for New Trial, Motion for
       Arrest of Judgment and Notice of Appeal.” However, the record reflects that appellant
       executed the Written Plea Admonishments-Waivers-Stipulations before sentencing and
       does not indicate that a waiver was executed in exchange for some consideration from the
       State. See Ex parte Broadway, 301 S.W.3d 694, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Sims v.
       State, 326 S.W.3d 707, 711 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2010, no pet.).
obligated to review it to ascertain whether the certification is defective and, if it is defective, we
must use Rules 37.1 and 34.5(c) to obtain a correct certification. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610,
614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 37.1.
        Accordingly, we grant the appellant’s motion, abate this appeal, and remand the case to
the trial court to prepare and file a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that complies with
Rule 25.2. Generally, the rules require that a defendant sign the trial court’s certification of his
right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that certification “be signed by the
defendant”). The rules authorize us, however, for good cause, to “suspend a rule’s operation in a
particular case and order a different procedure.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Because appellant has a
right of appeal, is represented by an attorney, and has previously signed a certification, indicating
that he has received the notification required by Rule 25.2(d), we find good cause in this case to
suspend the requirement of Rule 25.2(d) that appellant sign the amended certification of the right
of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 25.2(d).

        Accordingly, we order the trial court, without the necessity of a hearing, to execute an
amended “Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal.” This certification need
not be signed by appellant.

        We order appellant’s attorney, Joseph Kyle Verret, to deliver a copy of the certification
to appellant, via facsimile, mail, or any other method reasonably calculated to provide appellant
with a copy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (requiring copy of certification be given to defendant).

       We further order the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the
amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal no later than 14 days from the date of this
order.

        The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a record that complies
with this order is filed with the Clerk of this Court.

       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
                    Acting individually       Acting for the Court

Date: March 24, 2015