Court Opinion

ID: 49126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:55:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:33.367447
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 18, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-10964
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH CLEVELAND THIBODEAUX,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 5:06-CR-24-2
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Cleveland

Thibodeaux has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Thibodeaux filed a response and has moved for the appointment of

substitute counsel.   Our independent review of counsel’s brief,

Thibodeaux’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.      See

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 06-10964
                                 -2-

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.   The motion for the appointment of substitute

counsel is DENIED.