Court Opinion

ID: 567357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:12:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:39.833336
License: Public Domain

943 F.2d 49
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William Layton LAM, Petitioner-Appellant,v.DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Attorney General of theCommonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-7623.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.Decided Sept. 12, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-91-47-R)
William Layton Lam, appellant pro se.
Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
William Lyton Lam seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.   Lam v. Director Dept. Corr., CA-91-47-R (W.D.Va. May 24, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.