Court Opinion

ID: 3182416
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-03 17:23:30.018076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:59.016357
License: Public Domain

People v Haney (2016 NY Slip Op 01564)

People v Haney

2016 NY Slip Op 01564

Decided on March 3, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 3, 2016

Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, JJ.

393B 3107/13 263/14 60/14 393A 393

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
vRichard Haney, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Brittany Francis of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathan Krois of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered July 17, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 3, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.