Court Opinion

ID: 1605667
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:54:49.820549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:44:49.899038
License: Public Domain

108 Mich. App. 129 (1981)
310 N.W.2d 299
In re KARP ESTATE.
Docket No. 50910.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided July 27, 1981.
George H. Cholack and Porikos & Rodes, for Consul General of Greece.
Ivan M. Forbes, P.C., for Margaret Comas Meitron Karp.
Beier, Howlett, McConnell, Googasian & McCann, for Oakland University.
Before: BASHARA, P.J., and N.J. KAUFMAN and J.L. BANKS,[*] JJ.
J.L. BANKS, J.
Seymour Karp died on February 5, 1979, leaving a will, interpretation of which forms the basis of this appeal. Paragraph 4 of the will provides:
"I give, devise and bequeath one-half (1/2) of all the rest, residue and remainder of my property and estate, of which I may die seized or prossessed [sic], or to which I may be entitled to at the time of my death, or whatsoever kind or nature, real, personal or mixed, and wheresoever situate, including all property over which I may have the power to appoint or dispose of by my Last Will and Testament, to the Seymour and Margaret Karp Basic Religious Museum and Library, to be built in Plaka, Hania, Crete, Greece."
Attorneys representing the Greek Consul General attempted to intervene after the will was admitted to probate. After an exchange of letters, the Greek Consul sought adjournment of a hearing on a petition for construction of the will. The request for adjournment was denied. At that hearing, the probate court, without taking testimony, *131 determined that it was impossible or impracticable to carry out paragraph four of the will for three reasons:
First, the Seymour and Margaret Karp basic religious museum and library, the designated devisee, was nonexistent;
Second, that it was impossible or impracticable to cause a suitable legal entity to be created to carry out the specific purposes of paragraph four; and
Third, that the funds devised where insufficient in amount to carry out the specific purposes of paragraph four of the will.
Applying the cy pres doctrine (see Kostarides v Central Trust Co, 370 Mich. 690, 696-697; 122 NW2d 729 [1963]), the probate court awarded a devise to Oakland University to provide funds to establish a Seymour and Margaret Karp book collection on humanities and religion. Further, in an order denying rehearing, the probate court held that the nation of Greece, through its Consul General, was not an interested party in the Karp estate.
While we observe, as did the probate judge, that the library and museum were not in existence at the time that the will was construed, we find that there was an intent manifested by the testator to benefit the citizens of Plaka on the Island of Crete. The proper representative of those beneficiaries is the Greek government, by its Consul General. Kostarides v Central Trust Co, supra.
Moreover, by failing to take testimony, the probate court erred in applying cy pres. To properly apply cy pres:
1) The court must determine whether the gift creates a valid charitable trust;
2) It must be established that it is impossible or *132 impracticable to carry out the specific purpose of the trust; and
3) The court must determine whether, in creating the charitable trust, the testator (or settlor) had a general charitable intent. In re Rood Estate, 41 Mich. App. 405, 416-417; 200 NW2d 728 (1972), 2 Restatement Trusts, 2d, § 390, pp 297-307. We hold that the probate court erred in applying cy pres to the facts before it. Without taking any appropriate testimony the trial court had no basis for determining impossibility or impracticability of the specific bequest or that the amount of the bequest was not sufficient for carrying out the testator's intent.
We remand this case to the Probate Court for Oakland County for further proceedings, consistent with this opinion, in which the court shall allow the Greek Consul General to intervene. The court should receive evidence concerning the possibility of implementing the testator's bequest. We retain no jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.
NOTES
[*]  Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.