Court Opinion

ID: 8272673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:37:26.109706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:34.644237
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The questions raised in this case are precisely the same as those existing in the case of Fagan v. Hoboken, 55 Vroom 226, and the judgment of the Supreme Court entered in this case will be reversed and the proceedings and resolutions under review set aside for the reasons given in that case.
For affirmance — hione.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchabu, Paeiíer, Bergen, Mintuen, Yeedenburgit, Cong-don, White, Teehune, Heppeniteimeb, JJ. 11.