Court Opinion

ID: 2777316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-05 22:01:00.394785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:52:59.233875
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                             FEB 05 2015

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10577

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01105-SRB-1

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
ANGEL OCAMPO-SOTO, a.k.a. Jose
Paredes-Morales, a.k.a. Jose Peredez-
Morales,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted September 30, 2014**

Before:        HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

       Angel Ocampo-Soto appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Ocampo-Soto’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Ocampo-Soto the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro

se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Ocampo-Soto has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 63-month

sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the

appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,

986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      DISMISSED.

                                         2