Court Opinion

ID: 4238158
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-22 20:00:24.877412+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:03.215393
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 17-7144

ROSCOE ARTIS,

                     Plaintiff - Appellant,

              v.

EARL H. STRICKLAND; NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR,

                     Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03065-BO)

Submitted: January 18, 2018                                       Decided: January 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roscoe Artis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Roscoe Artis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Artis v. Strickland, No. 5:17-ct-03065-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED

                                            2