Court Opinion

ID: 4659252
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-02-10 20:09:04.173249+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:02.590369
License: Public Domain

People v Velez (2021 NY Slip Op 00884)

People v Velez

2021 NY Slip Op 00884

Decided on February 10, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 10, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-12444
 (Ind. No. 1821/17)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRodney Velez, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Ronald Alfano of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew D'Emic, J.), imposed September 7, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see  CPL 470.15[6][b]; People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., BARROS, CONNOLLY, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court