Court Opinion

ID: 3565522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:15:23.135997+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:03.038180
License: Public Domain

The sole and entire question in this case is whether a suit for deficiency under section 48 (3 Comp. Stat., p. 3421), upon a bond, secured by a mortgage, must be instituted within six months from the date of the public sale or from the date of confirmation of the sale.
This question has been recently, definitely, settled by this court in Wooton v. Pollock, 119 N.J. Eq. 128, requiring a reversal of the judgment under review, with costs.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14. *Page 87