Court Opinion

ID: 2924825
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:08:20.703986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:44.761914
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00425-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

PRENTICE WARE,	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee.

On Appeal from the 36th District Court 
of San Patricio County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, Prentice Ware, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated robbery. 
The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO
right of appeal."  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
	On July 7, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification
and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right
to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant
has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any
amended certification.
	On September 25, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel's
response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect
or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.  
	The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED.  Any pending motions are denied as moot.
							PER CURIAM
Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 2nd day of October, 2008.