Court Opinion

ID: 9893707
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-30 09:54:14.72986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:56.200408
License: Public Domain

In the
             Court of Appeals
     Second Appellate District of Texas
              at Fort Worth
          ___________________________
               No. 02-23-00173-CV
          ___________________________

JOSEPH MENDOZA AND VANESSA ACOSTA, Appellants

                           V.

             RACHEL LANEY, Appellee

      On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
               Tarrant County, Texas
           Trial Court No. 2023-001713-1

      Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.
          Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

      Appellants’ brief was due on September 11, 2023, but no brief was filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On September 25, 2023, we warned Appellants that we could

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, they filed a brief

and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex.

R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have

not received a response.

      Because Appellants have failed to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

                                                       Per Curiam

Delivered: October 26, 2023

                                            2