Court Opinion

ID: 996052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:45:44.081854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:01.750633
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANDREW COMO,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-95-495, CA-97-3477-7-20)

Submitted:     July 30, 1998                 Decided:   August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Como, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Andrew Como seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability, deny Como’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Como, Nos. CR-95-495; CA-97-3477-7-20 (D.S.C. Mar. 4,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2