Court Opinion

ID: 9385800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-10 08:08:31.306993+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:40.473950
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued April 6, 2023

                                     In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                    For The

                         First District of Texas
                           ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00114-CV
                           ———————————
                         JASON GARCIA, Appellant
                                       V.
            OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 25th District Court
                         Colorado County, Texas
                       Trial Court Cause No. 25,678

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Jason Garcia, filed an amended notice of restricted appeal from

the trial court’s September 26, 2022 judgment, September 26, 2022 order

confirming arrears and foreclosing lien, and November 23, 2022 order of sale. On

March 17, 2023, appellant filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the parties had
“resolved all issues leading to th[e] appeal” and the “appeal [was] no longer

necessary.”

      No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of

conference that states that appellant conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to

confer with appellee, the Office of the Attorney General, regarding the relief

requested in the motion.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten

days have passed, and no party has expressed opposition to appellant’s motion.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).

      Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

                                    PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

1
      Appellant’s motion states that “a [c]ertification of [c]onference is not necessary in
      this matter as the appeal is being dismissed pursuant to a [r]ule 11 settlement
      agreement.” But see TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5).

                                            2