Court Opinion

ID: 680632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:35:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:06.172102
License: Public Domain

37 F.3d 1507NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rafael ROJAS-ROCHA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50034.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 4, 1994.*Decided Oct. 6, 1994.

Before:  BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Rafael Rojas-Rocha appeals his 60-month sentence imposed following the entry of his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation with prior felony convictions in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326(a)-(b)(1).

3
Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rojas-Rocha's counsel submitted a brief stating the he finds no meritorious issues for review.  Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3