Court Opinion

ID: 591539
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:32.387166
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 725
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SPROUSE;  Mark R. Davis, individuallyand as employee of the Commonwealth of Virginia;Unknown Defendants, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6475.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 31, 1992Decided:  Sept. 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-92-316-R)
Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Frank Altizer appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Altizer v. Sprouse, No. CA-92-316-R (W.D. Va., Apr. 13, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED