Court Opinion

ID: 6065191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:29:54.398569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:59.397980
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered September 16, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant insurer established its prima facie entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law by adducing proof demonstrating that it had never insured the decedent’s life, and, indeed, that the decedent would not have been acceptable to it as a standard risk. Therefore, plaintiff, the alleged beneficiary of the policy purportedly issued by defendant insuring the decedent, was required to submit, in opposition to defendant’s showing, evidentiary proof, in admissible form, demonstrating the existence of material questions of fact as to whether the alleged coverage existed (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). This plaintiff failed to do. Therefore, the IAS Court properly granted defendant’s motion. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.