Court Opinion

ID: 9480964
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 08:03:49.576122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:48:01.260681
License: Public Domain

KING, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
Provided that the plaintiff’s state and federal habeas proceedings have been concluded by the majority’s action in the related case of Young v. Herring, slip op. at 910, 917 F.2d 864 (5th Cir.1990), I concur in the opinion and judgment in this case. For the reasons noted in my dissenting opinion, I would have affirmed the judgment of the district court denying the writ in Young. See Young, 917 F.2d at 864-65 (King, J., dissenting). Under the scenario of either the majority or the dissent in Young, however, Young’s habeas petition relating to the conviction at issue here would have been fully adjudicated.