Court Opinion

ID: 2923933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:54:07.286236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:55.186170
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-423-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

 
IN RE OCTAVIO CASTANEDA D/B/A

CASTANEDA BAIL BONDS AND O. CASTANEDA BAIL BONDS

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela 

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, Octavio Castaneda d/b/a Castaneda Bail Bonds and O. Castaneda Bail
Bonds, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 2, 2007. 	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief 

sought.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App.
P. 52.8(a). 

								PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 23rd day of July, 2007.

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).