Court Opinion

ID: 4454634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-08 21:07:21.260303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:09.978536
License: Public Domain

Matter of Riggins v Downing (2019 NY Slip Op 08081)

Matter of Riggins v Downing

2019 NY Slip Op 08081

Decided on November 8, 2019

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 8, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

1065 CAF 18-00963

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF TRACY A. RIGGINS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
vCLINTON J. DOWNING, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
CHRISTINE F. REDFIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (James A. Vazzana, J.), entered October 25, 2017 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order, among other things, directed respondent to stay away from petitioner. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of protection issued upon a finding that he committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.26 (1). We affirm. Contrary to respondent's contention, petitioner established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed harassment in the second degree (see Matter of Joan WW. v Peter WW., 173 AD3d 1380, 1381-1382 [3d Dept 2019]; cf. Matter of Shephard v Ray, 137 AD3d 1715, 1716 [4th Dept 2016]). We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and conclude that none warrants reversal or modification of the order of protection.
Entered: November 8, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court