Court Opinion

ID: 8505185
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 01:26:23.068431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:50:51.280990
License: Public Domain

Wilcox, J.
A plea denying a demand to assign dower is pleaded as a bar to the present action, but does not deny the demandant’s title to dower. Some question has been made whether a want of previous demand should not be pleaded in bar of the damages only. But however this may be, a demand is no part of the demandant’s title. It is only required to apprise the tenant of the claim made upon him, and to give him an opportunity to investigate the claim, and assign dower without a suit, if he chooses. It should, therefore, be made with reasonable certainty, so as to apprise the tenant of the claim that is made.
A demand of dower in all the lands whereof the husband was seized during coverture, or of all lands in which she had a right of dower, would not probably be sufficient. But • here she claims dower in the whole of “ Lot 89,” giving its boundaries. That would undoubtedly be sufficient, if she was entitled to dower in the whole lot, and we think the demand is not vitiated by the fact that it appears that she is not entitled to dower in some portions of the lot, or by the fact that the defendant was not seized of a part of it. The demandant might be mistaken about the extent of the tenant’s title, or of her own. That is no reason why she should not recover, so far as her title is sustained, and so far as the tenant is bound to assign her dower. He has had reasonable notice of the claim. He might ascertain, as well as the demandant, the true state of the title. If he admitted her right in any part of his lands, he should have assigned the dower. For her dower in the forty-one acres there should be ■

Judgment for the demandant.