Court Opinion

ID: 7157227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:12:38.53002+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:16.258859
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Pryor :
The condition of this record renders it difficult to settle any of the questions raised by the pleadings or the evidence; in fact, what evidence was heard does not appear, and on the motion to redocket the case facts may have been developed that justified the court in refusing to sustain the motion. The practice in regard to filing away civil cases, although indulged in frequently, is not authorized by the provisions of the code. If for any reason the parties fail to prosecute their action, or refuse to prosecute it, the court, if the *1064laches is attributable to the plaintiff, should dismiss the action for want of' prosecution or dismiss it without prejudice. A filing away of the action under the former practice embraced the right of the plaintiff to redocket the case on notice and motion to that effect, and was never considered a final disposition of the matters involved. Upon a proper presentation of appellants’ right to do so, we see no reason why the motion should not be entertained; and the refusal heretofore to redocket the case is not a bar to a subsequent proceeding of the same character. Entertaining this view of the question the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.

Hargis & Eastin, W. H. Cord, for appellants.

R. Gudgell & Son, for appellees.