Court Opinion

ID: 6317470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-25 01:00:35.587297+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:35.988810
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-50510     Document: 00516216558         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/24/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                       February 24, 2022
                                  No. 21-50510                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Henry Dewaine Miller,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:21-CR-16-1

    Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Henry Dewaine Miller has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Miller has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-50510     Document: 00516216558          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/24/2022

                                   No. 21-50510

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2