Court Opinion

ID: 2906658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 00:20:58.005708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:58.194260
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-08-304 CR

____________________

DENARIUS DARTIZ GUILLORY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 94533

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 On July 24, 2008, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from
the notice of appeal, and notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction unless we received a response from showing grounds for continuing the appeal. 
Appellant filed a response in which he addresses the merits of his appeal without establishing
this Court's jurisdiction.

	The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the trial court's order denying appellant's motion
for judgment nunc pro tunc.  See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco
2002, pet. ref'd) (Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying
a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.).  Accordingly, we hold that the order from which
appellant appeals is not appealable.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

							_________________________________
								    HOLLIS HORTON
									    Justice								

Opinion Delivered September 10, 2008							
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.