Court Opinion

ID: 2825214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-11 05:58:03.966304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:41.226924
License: Public Domain

pro se plaintiffs are not excused from holding a case conference). Given
                   these undisputed facts, 1 the district court was within its discretion when it
                   found that compelling and extraordinary circumstances did not exist to
                   justify an extension of NRCP 16.1(e)'s 180-day time frame We therefore
                               ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

                                                                  arraguirre

                                                                Douglas

                                                                   OnnA,                       J.

                   cc:   Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge
                         Ronald Alex Stevenson
                         Attorney General/Carson City
                         Pershing County Clerk

                         'Because these facts were undisputed, they were not "contentions"
                   needing the support of an affidavit under DCR 13(6).

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                         2
(0) 1947A    es.