Court Opinion

ID: 8453246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:27:59.381394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.604209
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Earl Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-4 (W.D.Va. May 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.