Court Opinion

ID: 2905244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:56:00.359231+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:41.258544
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-05-164 CV

____________________

R. L. RANDOLPH AND PATRICIA RANDOLPH, Appellants

V.

PILGRIMS PRIDE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 159th District Court
Angelina County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV-37314-04-04

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 On June 23, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for
want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellants
explained why they needed time for filing the record.  Appellants did not respond.  The
appellants are not entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. 
There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Costs are assessed against
appellants.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								__________________________
								      STEVE McKEITHEN
									   Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered August 25, 2005
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.