Court Opinion

ID: 9810553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:53:11.904524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:01.730748
License: Public Domain

George W. Draper III, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part
I concur with the principal opinion’s holding, except to the extent footnote 12 assumes the validity of the red light camera ordinance in Bonnie A. Roeder v. City of St. Peters, 466 S.W.3d 538 (Mo. banc 2015). In Roeder, I wrote separately to express my belief that the ordinance therein contains an implied rebuttable presumption as applied, rendering the ordinance invalid on the same grounds as those expressed in the principal opinion here. Accordingly, I concur in part and dissent in part.