Court Opinion

ID: 2964874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:32:28.623512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:59.808630
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-1313

                        EMANUEL R. GRANGE, A/K/A TEDDY MURPHY,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Emanuel R. Grange, a/k/a Teddy Murphy on brief pro se.
            _____________________________________
            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney   General,  and   Ellyn  H.   Lazar,
            __________________                              _________________
        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                  September 22, 1997
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   Appellant  Emanuel R.  Grange appeals
                      __________

            from  the district court's  dismissal of his  complaint filed

            under  42 U.S.C.     1983.    After carefully  reviewing  the

            parties' briefs and the record, we believe that the dismissal

            was  correct  for  essentially  the  reasons  stated  in  the

            district court's Order, dated January 23, 1997.

                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.    
                      ________   ___

                                         -2-