Court Opinion

ID: 5909883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 03:49:34.675501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:58.780809
License: Public Domain

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered July 8, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the People failed to prove his guilt of burglary in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. The People presented evidence that the defendant entered the complainant’s apartment without her permission and was seen carrying her portable television towards a half-open window.
The defendant also contends that the complainant’s testimony should not have been believed by the jury. However, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.