Court Opinion

ID: 4055021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 06:21:53.605854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:05:32.535715
License: Public Domain

hom. 5b.».t>!itj kott*^
                                                                      n&WS-ol

                                                                 nn RECEIVED IH
                                                                 COURT OF CRIM|NAL APPEALS
      RE:    QUESTION OF LAW/DISCRETIONAL AUTHORITY
                                                                            0 1 2015

               DEAR to$2010 WL 546676 (Tex. App.—El Paso, Feb. 17. 2010, pet. dism'd).
          2See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (holding/?/-^ pleadings to less stringent
   standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers); see also Franklin v. Rose, 765 F.2d 82, 85 (6th Cir.
   1985) (explaining that liberal construction allows for active interpretation ofapro se pleading to
  encompass any allegation which may raise aclaim for federal relief).
                                              ATTACHMENT (A)