Court Opinion

ID: 3113495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:15:24.6626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:09.056449
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                  San Antonio, Texas
                                       November 4, 2013

                                      No. 04-13-00583-CV

                 THE ESTATE OF WILLIE R. FORISTER, DECEASED,

                         From the County Court, Karnes County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 5795-12
                            Honorable Jim Scanlan, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER
        On October 4, 2013, we ordered the appellants to provide written proof that the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record had been paid. On October 8, 2013, appellants filed written proof
that the clerk’s fee had been paid. On October 30, 2013, the reporter’s record was filed. On
October 31, 2013, the clerk’s record was filed.

         The clerk’s record shows the trial court signed a final judgment on May 24, 2013.
Appellants filed a timely motion for new trial June 21, 2013. Therefore, the notice of appeal was
due to be filed on August 22, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time
to file the notice of appeal was due on September 6, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.3. Appellants’
notice of appeal was filed on August 26, 2013, which was within the fifteen-day grace period
allowed by Rule 26.3; however, appellants did not file a motion for extension of time within this
time period. Appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their notice of appeal on
September 10, 2013.

         A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for
extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing
to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

        Here, appellants’ motion for extension of time to file their notice appeal provides a
reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. In the motion,
appellants’ attorney explains that he erroneously calendared the deadline for filing the notice of
appeal for August 23, 2013, and that he mailed the notice of appeal on August 23, 2013. “[A]ny
plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to file . . . was not deliberate or
intentional, but was the result of inadvertance, mistake, or mischance, [would] be accepted as a
reasonable explanation.” Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989); see
also Dimotsis v. State Farm Lloyds, 966 S.W.2d 657, 657 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no
pet.). Any conduct short of deliberate or intentional noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence,
mistake or mischance, even if that conduct can also be characterized as professional negligence.
Garcia, 774 S.W.2d at 670; Dimotsis, 966 S.W.2d at 657. We, therefore, GRANT appellants’
motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal and ORDER this appeal retained on the
court’s docket. We further ORDER that appellants’ brief is due on December 1, 2013.

                                                   _________________________________
                                                   Karen Angelini, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 4th day of November, 2013.

                                                   ___________________________________
                                                   Keith E. Hottle
                                                   Clerk of Court