Court Opinion

ID: 8460761
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 06:34:58.809132+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:08.718156
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Toreano Josephus Browning appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the sentence imposed following revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Browning’s counsel has filed a brief *744stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.