Court Opinion

ID: 5473397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:44:27.45142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:23.444460
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Courts have allowed, pleas in, many instances, apparently as inconsistent as thosedn the present case. In Stibbard v. Glover, (Barnes, 364.) non cepit, property in a stranger, and liberum tenementum were allowed to be pleaded together, in replevin. So, not guilty and justification may be pleaded in trespass. We se© no reason, for distinguishing the present casp, from those decided,* The motion is denied.
Motion denied.

 Com. Dig. Pleader, E. 2.