Court Opinion

ID: 6048097
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 14:35:04.522309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:37.259788
License: Public Domain

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Richard Gissentanner and Marcia MacEntee s/h/a Marcia Mentee appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 3, 1999, as denied their motion for *583summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff failed to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
In opposition to the appellants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). Accordingly, the appellants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.