Court Opinion

ID: 2958085
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 02:58:18.832529+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:11.402472
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                        NO. 03-13-00543-CR

                                     Billy Ray Byers, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                     The State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
       NO. D-1-DC-11-302268, THE HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               A jury convicted appellant Billy Ray Byers of murder, see Tex. Penal Code

§ 19.02(b)(1), and assessed his punishment at confinement for life in the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice, see id. § 12.32.

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988).
               Appellant’s counsel sent appellant a copy of the brief along with a letter advising

appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S.

at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.

               We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error.

See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious

grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial

court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

                                              __________________________________________
                                              J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Affirmed

Filed: July 23, 2014

Do Not Publish

                                                 2