Court Opinion

ID: 5371983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 08:17:00.876399+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:01.625468
License: Public Domain

— Action at law. The complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only. Defendant-respondent in his answer pleaded an equitable counterclaim, which he also invoked as a defense. Order dated December 4, 1941, denying motion of plaintiff-appellant for a prior and separate trial of defendant-respondent’s equitable counterclaim, and order dated January 27, 1942, denying a similar motion made by defendant-appellant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.