Court Opinion

ID: 3161043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-09 15:01:03.513114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:59:43.573783
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-11519   Date Filed: 12/09/2015   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-11519
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-20588-DMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

TIMOTHY STARKS,
a.k.a. Tim Brown,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (December 9, 2015)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11519     Date Filed: 12/09/2015    Page: 2 of 2

      Mauricio Aldazabal, appointed counsel for Timothy Starks, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks=s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                           2