Court Opinion

ID: 9390914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-28 20:06:54.092875+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:38.093406
License: Public Domain

People v Bishop (2023 NY Slip Op 02242)

People v Bishop

2023 NY Slip Op 02242

Decided on April 28, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

365 KA 22-00342

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJOSEPH BISHOP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY W. OASTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Stephen J. Dougherty, J.), rendered February 15, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [a]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable and his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that the waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable, we perceive no basis in the record for us to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see  CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
Entered: April 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court