Court Opinion

ID: 3877883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:10:21.020386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:48.321148
License: Public Domain

January 13, 1925. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Action to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the purchase price of electrical machinery. The plaintiff claimed a balance due of $933.43 and interest. The defendant admitted that it was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $509.13, and interposed a counterclaim. The Circuit Judge found that the defendant's counterclaim was not sustained by the evidence and that the amount due by defendant to plaintiff was $509.13, the amount the defendant admitted to be owing.
The plaintiff appeals upon the ground that the evidence establishes by the clear preponderance thereof that the amount due and owing by the defendant is $933.43, instead of $509.13 as found. The validity of plaintiff's claim as to its right to recover this difference depends upon whether certain of the articles of equipment bought by the defendant were actually delivered. The evidence adduced in the case was taken before a referee, who merely reported this evidence to the Circuit Judge without making any findings of fact or stating any conclusions of law. The goods were shipped under a number of different bills of landings and invoices, and a fair appraisal of the merits of the contentions of the respective parties involves a review of a mass of evidentiary matter, and, to a certain extent, a statement of mutual accounts.
We have given the record as careful review and consideration as the time at our command permits, with the result that we are of the opinion that the appellant has sufficiently sustained the burden of showing that the judgment of the Circuit Court, fixing and limiting the amount of defendant's indebtedness to the plaintiff at $509.13, is not so fully supported by the preponderance of the evidence as to justify us in affirming the judgment.
We think the case is one which should be subjected to a careful review and analysis by a competent referee, under instructions to find the facts, state the accounts, and report his conclusions to the Circuit Court. *Page 379 
The judgment of the Circuit Court is accordingly reversed and the case remanded, with directions that the cause be submitted to a Special Referee for the purposes indicated.
MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and COTHRAN concur.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.