Court Opinion

ID: 7543203
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:30:15.957324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:53.636870
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT
PER CURIAM.
We deny the motion for rehearing.
In affirming by adhering to the authority of State v. Akers, 367 So.2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), we continue to be in conflict with Ramsey v. State, 442 So.2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
RYDER, C.J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.