Court Opinion

ID: 1005385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:55:56.72112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:32.725407
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Leverne Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying Wilson’s motion to schedule restitution payments. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Wilson,
  
  No. CR-99-653 (D.S.C. June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.