Court Opinion

ID: 9767810
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:27:58.898098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:33.177841
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING.
After stating in our original opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals sustained the cross assignment of the City complaining of that portion of the judgment of the trial court awarding Priolo $326.00 as temporary damages, and that Priolo assigned no error in this court to that ruling, we, nevertheless, entered an order reversing the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirming that of the trial court. Upon having the matter called to our attention on rehearing, it is apparent that our order should be modified, and the same is hereby modified, to read as follows:
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in so far as it reduced the recovery in the trial court in the amount of $326.00 is not disturbed; in other respects it is reversed and the judgment judgment of the trial court as reduced by the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.
Opinion delivered July 18, 1951.