Court Opinion

ID: 9831296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:00:21.023857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:39.326870
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2282      Doc: 20         Filed: 08/31/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2282

        WILLIAM WHITTMAN,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        PPE CASINO RESORTS MARYLAND, LLC, d/b/a Live Casino & Hotel; THE
        CORDISH COMPANIES, INC.,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01547-SAG)

        Submitted: August 29, 2023                                        Decided: August 31, 2023

        Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        William Whittman, Appellant Pro Se. Todd M. Reinecker, PILIEROMAZZA PLLC,
        Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2282      Doc: 20         Filed: 08/31/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               William Whittman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to

        dismiss and dismissing without prejudice his complaint raising claims under Title II of the

        Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, and state law. * We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Whittman v.

        PPE Casino Resorts Md., LLC, No. 1:22-cv-01547-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 13, 2022). We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

               *
                 The district court’s order is a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See
        Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).

                                                     2