Court Opinion

ID: 4353682
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-21 21:49:02.690874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:31.551776
License: Public Domain

People v Burks (2018 NY Slip Op 08859)

People v Burks

2018 NY Slip Op 08859

Decided on December 21, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 21, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

1373 KA 17-00104

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vLELAND S. BURKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered December 20, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of identity theft in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of identity theft in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.80 [1]) and scheme to defraud in the first degree (§ 190.65 [1] [b]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).
Entered: December 21, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court