Court Opinion

ID: 9737798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:34:36.607696+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:01.315510
License: Public Domain

Quirico, J.
(dissenting in part). The court holds in the penultimate paragraph of its opinion that “[t]he Workmen’s Compensation Act does not bar the [wife’s claim] for loss of consortium and society.” The holding was stated in language quoted in turn from the court’s opinion of this same date in the case of Ferriter v. Daniel O’Connell’s Sons, supra, at 553. I respectfully dissent from that holding for the same reasons on which I based my dissent from the same holding in the Ferriter case. Supra at 530 (Quirico, J. dissenting).