Court Opinion

ID: 5116750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-07 16:00:54.684549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:04.874831
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 21-2461
                        ___________________________

                           Neal K. Maddox, "Scott K."

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

           Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: October 4, 2021
                              Filed: October 7, 2021
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      In this employment action, Neal Maddox appeals the district court’s1 pre-
service dismissal of his pro se complaint. After careful review of the record and

      1
       The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
Maddox’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Doe v. Cassel, 403
F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________

                                        -2-