Court Opinion

ID: 990031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:15:35.8275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:33.224595
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

HAITHAM SHURBAJI,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-461-A, CA-93-323-AM)

Submitted:   July 25, 1996                 Decided:   August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haitham Shurbaji, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Shurbaji, Nos. CR-92-461-A; CA-93-323-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2