Court Opinion

ID: 9571468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:32:01.914446+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:27.840586
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
MURRAY, Judge.
The appellant has filed a petition for rehearing, setting forth the reasons why appellant’s counsel did not proceed with this appeal. In substance these pertain to the problems of the (then) clerk of the district court of Burleigh County, and to the preoccupation of appellant’s counsel with other cases and office problems. Appellant’s counsel also states his version of why correspondence from the clerk of this court was not answered or complied with. Having examined the petition, we find no reason to change our original opinion. However, in order to determine whether the appellant had substantial rights which were being denied to her by our holding, we have made a thorough examination of the entire record and have come to the conclusion that a hearing on the merits would avail her nothing.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
TEIGEN, C. J., and STRUTZ, ERICK-STAD, and KNUDSON, JJ., concur.