Court Opinion

ID: 6771029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:43:52.609832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:44.365705
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the arguments and stipulations in this case and concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-101(A)(l), (2), and (3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We also agree with the recommended sanction. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.