Court Opinion

ID: 5856477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 01:05:31.674024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:17.110337
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimants, entered October 20, 1980, upon a decision of the Court of Claims (Hanifin, J.). Following a bifurcated trial, claimant Bruce Minckler was awarded a judgment of $50,000 against the State for injuries sustained as a passenger in a one-car accident on a State highway. The judgment against the State followed an interlocutory judgment finding that the State had negligently maintained the highway shoulder and apportioning liability 10% to claimant, 50% to the vehicle’s driver and 40% to the State. The State has taken this appeal and argues that the trial court mistakenly found that it owed a duty to claimant to maintain the highway shoulders for use by the traveling public. We agree. *677Under the circumstances presented by this case, in which the driver maneuvered his vehicle onto the defective shoulder solely by reason of his own negligence and not as the result of any emergency, the State owed no duty to those traveling in the car to properly maintain the highway shoulder (Rolando v State of New York, Dept. of Transp., 58 AD2d 694, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 643, app dsmd 43 NY2d 746; Guyotte v State of New York, 22 AD2d 975, mot for lv to app den 15 NY2d 483). Accordingly, any negligence by the State in regard to maintenance of the roadway’s shoulder cannot serve as the basis for an award in this case. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and claim dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.