Court Opinion

ID: 120990
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 17:21:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:48.252674
License: Public Domain

535 U.S. 1110
MULAZIMv.MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL.
No. 01-9451.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 3, 2002.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 28 Fed. Appx. 470.

1
(For opinion of Justice Scalia dissenting from grants of applications for stays of execution in No. 01A834, ante, p. 1044, and No. 01A853, ante, p. 1050, see ante, p. 1044.)