Court Opinion

ID: 9371549
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-16 17:00:24.556219+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:29.407815
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 22-3223
                         ___________________________

                             United States of America,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                           v.

                             Davion Lashaun Trawick,

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                        ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: February 9, 2023
                             Filed: February 16, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Davion Trawick appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 10 months in prison and an additional term of supervised

      1
       The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the
revocation sentence is unreasonable.

       We conclude that Trawick’s sentence was not unreasonable, as there is no
indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight
to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th
Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th
Cir. 2006); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004); see also
United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014).

      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
                     ______________________________

                                          -2-