Court Opinion

ID: 9681079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:43:36.114135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:32.131986
License: Public Domain

FINCH, Judge
(dissenting).
This appeal involves the question of whether the conversion of U. S. Route 67 to a limited access highway caused Respondent Anna Pitti to lose her pre-existing right of access to U. S. Route 67 or whether the construction of an outer roadway preserved her right of access and prevented consideration of loss of access in determining her damages. I find myself unable to concur in the majority opinion for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion filed in the case of State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Brockfeld, et al., Mo., 388 S.W.2d 862, decided simultaneously with this case.
I would affirm the judgment.