Court Opinion

ID: 7065130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 07:25:11.394492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:21.074051
License: Public Domain

Roby, J.
This case is affirmed on the authority of Axtell v. State (1909), ante, 131. The records in the eases are identical, except that the recognizance bond in this case was to secure the appearance of Charles Hegwood to answer to a charge of rape on the person of Iva York Hegwood on June 1, 1905, and the bond in Axtell v. State, supra, was io secure Ilegwood’s appearance to answer to a charge of the same crime on the person of Bessie York Hegwood on October —, 1904.