Court Opinion

ID: 8800833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 14:31:16.234961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:03:53.750645
License: Public Domain

DOOUNG, District Judge.
The Garden City collided with the Klamath in a dense fog, inflicting substantial injury; herself being uninjured. The owner of the Klamath filed a libel in this court alleging that the collision was due solely to the fault of the Garden City. The latter answered averring that the collision was due solely to the fault of the Klamath. There was no cross-libel. The court found that both vessels were at fault and ordered that a decree be entered for divided damages. A decree has now been presented assessing against the Garden City one-half of the damage sustained by the Kla-math. Libelant now claims full costs. Respondent contends that the 'costs, like the damages, should be divided. This contention seems to be in accord with the settled rule in such cases. The Edward Luckenback (D. C.) 94 Fed. 544; The Bermuda (D. C.) 128 Fed. 816; The Gladiator (D. C.) 223 Fed. 381.
_ The costs will therefore be divided.