Court Opinion

ID: 1007286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:23:29.25392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:01.052729
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and rec
   
   *104
   
  ommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his coram nobis petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Gravely,
  
  No. CR-94-82 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.