Court Opinion

ID: 6469776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-26 14:12:48.869314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:53:47.270883
License: Public Domain

CARMODY, Justice (concurring specially) . Although I remain of the opinion that Wooley v. Wicker is erroneous (see my dissent, 75 N.M. 241, 247, 403 P.2d 685, 689), nevertheless the determination of the-court in that case, that § 21-9-1, N.M.S.A. 1953, does not apply to motions under Rule 60(b), is controlling unless and until Wooley is overruled. Therefore, I concur-in the result reached, that the judgment, should be affirmed.