Court Opinion

ID: 9419054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:45:15.025062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:31.475990
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice McReynolds,
dissenting:
I am of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be reversed" and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the bill. In the circumstances disclosed, I conclude that the District Court should have refused to interfere by injunction with the essential rights of the municipality to control its own parks and streets. Wise management of such intimate local affairs, generally at -least, is beyond the competency of federal courts, and essays in -that direction should be avoided.
*533There was ample opportunity for respondents to assert their claims through an orderly proceeding in courts of the state empowered authoritatively to interpret her laws with final review here in respect of federal questions.