Court Opinion

ID: 9827247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 17:19:28.937398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:27.504579
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION EOR, REHEARING.
By some unaccountable oversight we held that limitation barred appellant’s action on some of the interest coupons sued on, and neglected to apply it to others in exactly the same condition. We intended to hold that limitation barred all the coupons sued on which matured on April 10, 1894. Applying this rule, we hold that the three interest coupons of bonds numbered 8, 9, and 10, which matured April 10, 1894, and also the two coupons of bonds numbered 22 and 23 which matured at the same time, for which judgment was given below, and to which action ap*648pellee malees a cross-assignment of error in his brief in this court, are each and all barred by limitation of four years, the same as all coupons from bonds numbered 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, and 50, which matured April 10, 1894.
We therefore order that the judgment herein be corrected as above indicated, and that in all other respects the motion for rehearing be overruled.

Overruled.

Writ of error refused.