Court Opinion

ID: 9825370
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:46:54.872377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:45.153369
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
[4] Refused charge 7 has met with the approval of the Supreme Court in a long line of decisions from Bluett’s Case, 151 Ala. 41, 44 South. 84, down to the present; the latest being Teel v. State (Ala. App.) 92 South. 518,1 wherein this court followed the holding of the Supreme Court, and, on appeal by the state, the Supreme Court again gave its approval of such a charge. Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, 207 Ala. 349, 92 South. 606.
Upon a reconsideration of the court’s oral charge, we are unwilling to declare that it fairly and substantially covers the matters set out in charge 7, and for this reason the application for rehearing is granted, judgment of affirmance is set aside, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.

 Ante, p. 405.