Court Opinion

ID: 72345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 07:29:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:22.617973
License: Public Domain

Case: 09-40681     Document: 00511085838          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2010

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2010
                                     No. 09-40681
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DERRICK TYRONE DAUGHERTY,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 1:08-CR-72-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Tyrone
Daugherty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Daugherty has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 09-40681   Document: 00511085838 Page: 2      Date Filed: 04/20/2010
                               No. 09-40681

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

                                     2