Court Opinion

ID: 9369494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-08 21:00:37.527733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:15.526584
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11502    Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 02/08/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11502
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       PHILIP FISHER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00251-PGB-LHP-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11502      Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 02/08/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                       Order of the Court                  22-11502

       Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEWSOM and GRANT, Cir-
       cuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Philip Fisher in this
       direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
       sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
       California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
       tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
       the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
       tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Fisher’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED.