Court Opinion

ID: 4450854
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-28 20:02:03.286707+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:50:45.014524
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 17-1751V
                                     Filed: August 16, 2019
                                         UNPUBLISHED

    DIANA L. MITCHELL,

                        Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                                                             Interim Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.

Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Sands Anderson, P.C., Richmond, VA, for petitioner.
Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.

                DECISION ON INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On November 8, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (SIRVA) resulting in “debilitating pain and limited mobility in her left
shoulder and arm” resulting from her November 14, 2014 influenza (“Flu”) vaccine.
Petition at 1.

1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       On June 11, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for interim attorneys’ fees and costs.
ECF No. 44. Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $22,813.20 and
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $685.16. Id. at 10-11. Thus, the total amount
requested is $23,498.36.

        The requested fees include work performed and costs incurred through July 14,
2017, when Petitioner’s counsel of record Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, was employed
at the Rawls Law Group (“RLG”). Id. at 7. Petitioners argue that an award of interim
fees and costs is appropriate in this case for two reasons. First, petitioners argue that
their claim satisfies the good faith and reasonable basis criteria. Id. at 6. Second, they
argue that the legal work in this matter has been ongoing since January 2015 and
“[b]ecause RLG employees are no longer involved in this case[,] RLG is experiencing
financial hardship and delay for work” performed by Ms. Muldowney while she was
employed at RLG. Id. at 7.

        Respondent filed his response to petitioner’s motion on June 24, 2019. ECF No.
47. Respondent did not provide any objection to petitioner’s request. Id. at 2. Instead
“respondent respectfully recommends that the Special Master exercise [her] discretion
and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. at 3. Respondent
noted, however, that he “defers to the Special Master to determine whether or not
petitioner has met the legal standard for an interim fees and costs award.” Id at. 2.

       For the reasons stated by petitioner, lack of objection by respondent, and
because the amounts requested are substantial and the proceedings within this court
have been pending for over three years, the undersigned GRANTS the motion for
interim attorneys’ fees and costs. See Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Humans Servs., 515
F. 3d. 1343, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

       Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $23,498.363 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and former counsel for
petitioner, Rawls Law Group.

          The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                            s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                            Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                            Chief Special Master

3   This amount is intended to cover fees and costs as set forth in this motion.

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                       2