Court Opinion

ID: 660845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:11:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:09.971313
License: Public Domain

14 F.3d 594
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Wallace S. DAVIS, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Glynis SMITH;  Paramount Studios;  Jefferson PilotBroadcasting Company, Channel 12;  James Berry,Sergeant;  Virginia Department ofCorrections, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7210.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.Decided Jan. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.
Wallace S. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA;  Ira C. Wolpert, Foley & Lardner, Washington, D.C.;   James LeRoy Banks, Jr., Christian, Barton, Epps, Brent & Chappell, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his claims for civil rights violations, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988), and copyright infringement, 17 U.S.C.A. Sec. 501 (West 1977 & Supp.1993).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Davis v. Smith, No. CA-91-747-AM (E.D. Va.  Oct. 21, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.