Court Opinion

ID: 2831639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-27 18:00:54.364532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:25.775080
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-41416      Document: 00513171797         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/27/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 14-41416
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                          August 27, 2015
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

JOSE MICHEL SALAS-OLVERA,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:14-CR-1059

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Salas-Olvera
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-41416   Document: 00513171797    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/27/2015

                               No. 14-41416

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salas-Olvera has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2