Court Opinion

ID: 1003616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:29:03.65015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:27.140480
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7524

ROBERT V. FUNK,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

S. K. YOUNG,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke.    James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-99-801-7)

Submitted:     February 8, 2001          Decided:    February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert V. Funk, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert V. Funk seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Funk v. Young, No. CA-99-801-7

(W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2