Court Opinion

ID: 3925463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:51:44.792872+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:49:50.217416
License: Public Domain

The complaint in the motion of the reception by the court of evidence showing that the appellant, at the time of his arrest, had $61.65 upon his person is not available as a ground for reversal for the reason that the same fact was proved by the appellant's own testimony without objection. See Wood v. State, 109 Tex.Crim. Rep., 5 S.W.2d 146; Sherow v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. Rep., 9 S.W.2d 353; Bevers v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. Rep., 9 S.W.2d 1040; Tate v. State,111 Tex. Crim. 156, 12 S.W.2d 210; Bonilla v. State,108 Tex. Crim. 603, 2 S.W.2d 248; Frey v. State,109 Tex. Crim. 168, 3 S.W.2d 459; McLaughlin v. State, 109 Tex.Crim. Rep., 4 S.W.2d 54; Sifuentes et al. v. State, 109 Tex.Crim. Rep., *Page 616 5 S.W.2d 144; Houston v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. Rep.,  16 S.W.2d 119; Diaz v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. Rep.,  16 S.W.2d 240; Brookshire v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. Rep.,16 S.W.2d 1082; Herman v. State, 112 Tex.Crim. Rep.,18 S.W.2d 170; Aggers v. State, 114 Texas Crim Rep., 391,24 S.W.2d 838; Grogan v. State, 114 Tex.Crim. Rep.,24 S.W.2d 1096; Bonin v. State, 117 Tex.Crim. Rep.,33 S.W.2d 444; Benoit v. State, 117 Tex.Crim. Rep.,36 S.W.2d 168; Johnson v. State, 118 Tex.Crim. Rep.,42 S.W.2d 421; Reusch v. State, 119 Tex.Crim. Rep.,45 S.W.2d 209; Spicer v. State, 119 Tex.Crim. Rep.,46 S.W.2d 707.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.