Court Opinion

ID: 989407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:06:35.16016+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.774853
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7756

BRUCE FRANKLIN JERRETT,

                                          Petitioner - Appellant,

         versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

                                           Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-95-32-6)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                  Decided:   May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Franklin Jerrett, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jerrett v. Attorney
General of North Carolina, No. CA-95-32-6 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2