Court Opinion

ID: 9680457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:32:04.756539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:28.480703
License: Public Domain

*460Concurring Opinion on Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing
COHEN, Justice.
Although I consider the appellant’s arguments in point of error one to be strong based on the facts of this case, I concur in the majority opinion because, as it states, we are reviewing “no evidence” points of error and, therefore, we consider only the evidence and inferences therefrom which tend to support the judgment, and disregard all evidence and inferences to the contrary. Graza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.1965). If “insufficient evidence” points of error were presented, we would consider and weigh all the evidence, which, in my opinion, might well call for a different result regarding whether Shell assumed joint responsibility for safety procedures on this project.