Court Opinion

ID: 6542468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:16:51.657576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:52.305824
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.  Mortgage.  The mortgage offered in evidence sufficiently described the subject mortgaged (Johnson v. Grisard, 51 Ark., 410) and the parties named as mortgagees. Perciful v. Platt, 36 Ark., 456; Kellogg v. Olsen, 34 Minn., 103; Morse v. Carpenter, 19 Vt., 613; Sherry v. Gilmore, 58 Wisc., 332—3; Chicago Lumber Co. v. Ashworth, 26 Kan., 212; Newton v. McKay, 29 Mich., 1; Beaman v. Whitney, 20 Me., 413; Hoffman v. Porter, 2 Brock, 156; Murray v. Blackledge, 71 N. C., 492. The court erred in refusing to admit the mortgage in evidence. Reverse and remand for a new trial.