Court Opinion

ID: 990839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:27:45.96145+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:45.811220
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7123

GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR.,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden of Greensville,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-96-436-2)

Submitted:   November 7, 1996          Decided:     November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Samuel Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Garraghty, No. CA-96-

436-2 (E.D. Va. May 22 & July 5, 1996). We also deny Appellant's

motions for psychiatric assistance, counsel, and an evidentiary

hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2