Court Opinion

ID: 8651150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 20:26:03.825496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:32.811340
License: Public Domain

SULLIVAN, CMef Judge
(concurring):
Evidence was admitted that the substance of the transaction in tMs ease was that appellant bought and then delivered drugs to Mike *169on base on January 11, 1989. Cf. United States v. Dayton, 29 MJ 6, 12 (CMA 1989). He was not a conduit between Burke and Mike but between the Chicago dealer and Mike. I see no lawful distribution in this context. Cf. United States v. Hill, 25 MJ 411 (CMA 1988); United States v. Bretz, 19 MJ 224 (CMA 1985).