Court Opinion

ID: 6048652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 14:38:28.352642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:38.115739
License: Public Domain

Motion for an order, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, directing the respondents, a Justice of the Supreme Court, and the County Clerk of Kings County, respectively, to subscribe and enter a proposed interlocutory judgment of annulment in a matrimonial action, denied, without costs. Under the facts and circumstances of this case mandamus does not lie. (Himmelstein v. Himmelstein, 186 Mise. 964.) (Hos. 561, 562.) In view of the- decision of motion Ho. 560, decided herewith, respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition are dismissed, without costs. Present— Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.