Court Opinion

ID: 8451630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:40:09.948436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.124468
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Irvin Hannis Catlett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Catlett v. Worcester, No. 8:11-cv-00162-PJM, 2011 WL 6002044 (D.Md. Nov. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.