Court Opinion

ID: 989149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:02:51.482819+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:42.161310
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-6164

MILTON C. INCIARTE,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN HAHN, Warden,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
Judge. (CA-95-1490-A)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                   Decided:   May 3, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton C. Inciarte, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

reconsideration of an order denying Appellant's motion for a pre-

liminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Inciarte v. Hahn,
No. CA-95-1490-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2