Court Opinion

ID: 9507268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 21:20:44.039974+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:17.322209
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE SHEEHY
specially concurring:
I concur in the result, especially in the light of Luebeck v. Safeway Stores, Inc. (1968), 152 Mont. 88, 446 P.2d 921. I think in a proper case we should re-examine the fiction that different rules should apply on the duty owed to persons lawfully on another’s premises, based on their economic relationship to the possessor of the premises. In other words, I see no reason for differentiating be*173tween invitees and licensees because of the economic difference in their reasons for going upon another’s property, but that is another case.