Court Opinion

ID: 8118437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:48:39.199428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:53.735859
License: Public Domain

Watson, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:
That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, consists of sulfamethazine, a chemical compound appraised on the basis of American selling price as defined in Section *765402 (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, which basis of appraisement is not in dispute.
That the price, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at which competitive merchandise produced in the United States was freely sold for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, was $5.85 per kilo, less 1%.
That the appeal herein be submitted on this stipulation, limited to the merchandise described herein, and abandoned as to all other merchandise.
On the agreed facts, I find that American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question and that such value was $5.85 per kilo, less 1 percent.
Judgment will issue accordingly.