Court Opinion

ID: 4339239
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-14 04:19:12.377617+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:30.674095
License: Public Domain

DANIEL STERN AND REIZEL STERN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentStern v. Comm'rDocket No. 6024-11United States Tax CourtT.C. Memo 2012-204; 2012 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 205; 104 T.C.M. (CCH) 82; July 19, 2012, Filed*205 An appropriate order and decision will be entered.Ps, husband and wife with many children, resided in Israel at all relevant times; P-H was a U.S. citizen whereas P-W was not. None of Ps' children was born a U.S. citizen, and none became a U.S. citizen until after the close of the taxable years in issue. On their returns, Ps claimed dependency exemption deductions for their children, as well as nonrefundable and refundable child tax credits. R disallowed such deductions and credits.Held: R's summary judgment motion will be granted; Ps are not entitled to either the dependency exemption deductions or the child tax credits. SeeI.R.C. secs. 152(b)(3), 24(c)(2); Carlebach v. Commissioner, 139 T.C.    , 2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25">2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25 (July 19, 2012).Daniel Stern and Reizel Stern, Pro se.Scott A. Hovey, for respondent.ARMEN, Special Trial Judge.ARMENMEMORANDUM OPINIONARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's Motion For Summary Judgment, filed March 13, 2012, pursuant to Rule 121. 1 In his motion respondent moves for a summary adjudication in his favor as to the underlying deficiencies, additions to tax, and penalties determined by him in the notice of deficiency. Petitioners filed an Objection *206 to respondent's motion on May 9, 2012. Thereafter, by Order dated June 13, 2012, respondent's motion was assigned for disposition.As a threshold matter we must decide whether disposition of this case by summary judgment is appropriate. If so, we must then decide whether petitioners are entitled to the dependency exemption deductions and the child tax credits claimed by them on their returns for the years in issue.At the time that the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Israel.BackgroundPetitioners are a married couple and were married throughout the period at issue in this case, i.e., the taxable (calendar) years 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. During that period petitioners resided in Israel. Petitioner Daniel Stern was a U.S. citizen, whereas petitioner Reizel Stern was not.Petitioners have many children. Throughout the period at issue petitioners' children resided in Israel. None of petitioners' children was born as a U.S. citizen, and none of petitioners' children became *207 a U.S. citizen until July 14, 2008. 2Petitioners filed joint Federal income tax returns for the years in issue. 3 Petitioners filed their returns on the following dates:YearDate Filed2004June 11, 20082005Feb. 4, 20092006Sept. 18, 20082007Sept. 18, 2008On their Federal income tax returns *208 for the years in issue, petitioners claimed personal exemptions for themselves and dependency exemptions for their children as follows:Number of Exemptions ClaimedYearPersonalDependencyTotal2004279200528102006281020072911Also on their Federal income tax returns for the years in issue, petitioners reported and claimed the following items in the indicated amounts:ReportedClaimedTax Liability1AdditionalRefundYearEarned Income< CTC> CTCCTCrec'd2004$49,000$1,143-0-$5,738$5,738200555,4001,343-0-6,6576,657200656,2001,293-0-6,7076,707200755,4001,343-0-6,6576,6571 Tax liability before (<) and after (>) Child Tax Credit (CTC).In the notice of deficiency respondent disallowed the dependency exemption deductions, the child tax credit, and the additional child tax credit claimed by petitioners for each of the years in issue. 4 Respondent also determined that for each of the years in issue, petitioners were liable for the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).Petitioners timely *209 filed a petition for redetermination challenging respondent's deficiency determinations. Seesec. 6213(a). Petitioners did not challenge respondent's determinations regarding their liability for the additions to tax and the accuracy-related penalties. 5DiscussionA. *210 Summary JudgmentRule 121 provides for summary judgment. Summary judgment serves to "expedite litigation and avoid unnecessary and expensive trials." Fla. Peach Corp. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678">90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988). Either party may move for summary judgment upon all or any part of the legal issues in controversy but we may grant summary judgment only if there are no genuine issues of material fact. Rule 121(a); Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527">85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).As the moving party, respondent bears the burden of proving that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact and that respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See FPL Group, Inc. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 554">115 T.C. 554, 559 (2000). Petitioners, as the party opposing summary judgment, must do more than simply suggest that "there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts", Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574">475 U.S. 574, 586, 106 S. Ct. 1348">106 S. Ct. 1348, 89 L. Ed. 2d 538">89 L. Ed. 2d 538 (1986), but must set forth specific facts which show that a question of genuine material fact exists, seeRule 121(d); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317">477 U.S. 317, 324, 106 S. Ct. 2548">106 S. Ct. 2548, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265">91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986).Upon review of the record we are satisfied that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision *211 may be rendered as a matter of law. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow we shall grant respondent's motion.B. Dependency Exemption DeductionsIn the case of an individual, section 151(a) authorizes as deductions in computing taxable income the exemptions provided by such section. In particular, section 151(c) allows an exemption for each individual who is the taxpayer's dependent as defined in section 152. 6In order for a child to qualify as a dependent various requirements must be satisfied. Relevant here is the requirement that the child must be a citizen or national of the United States or a resident of the United States or a country contiguous to the United States. Sec. 152(b)(3).In the instant case, petitioners and their children resided in Israel during the years in issue. None of petitioners' children was born as a U.S. citizen, *212 and none became a U.S. citizen until July 14, 2008. Accordingly, none of petitioners' children qualifies as a "dependent" within the meaning of section 152, and petitioners are therefore not entitled to a dependency exemption deduction under section 151(c) for any of the years in issue. See Carlebach v. Commissioner, 139 T.C.    , 2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25">2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25 (July 19, 2012).C. Child Tax CreditSection 24(a) allows as a credit against the tax imposed a specified amount, commonly know as the child tax credit. 7Section 24(d) makes a portion of the credit refundable, and such portion is popularly known as the additional child tax credit.In order to qualify for a child tax credit, various requirements must be satisfied. Principal among these is the requirement that there be a "qualifying child". Seesec. 24(a). Such term is defined by section 24(c). Pursuant to section 24(c)(2), *213 a child is not a "qualifying child" for purposes of the child tax credit if such child is neither a citizen or national of the United States nor a resident of the United States.As previously stated, during the years at issue petitioners and their children resided in Israel. None of petitioners' children was born as a U.S. citizen, and none became a U.S. citizen until July 14, 2008. Accordingly, none of petitioners' children qualifies as a "qualifying child" within the meaning of section 24, and petitioners are therefore not entitled to a child tax credit (whether refundable or nonrefundable) for any of the years in issue. See Carlebach v. Commissioner, 139 T.C.    , 2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25">2012 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 25 (July 19, 2012).D. ConclusionIn order to give effect to the foregoing,An appropriate order and decision will be entered.Footnotes1. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and, unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue.↩2. See Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA), Pub. L. No. 82-414, sec. 301, 66 Stat. at 163, as amended, 8 U.S.C. sec. 1401 (2006) (specifying who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth); see also id. sec. 322, 8 U.S.C. sec. 1433 (2006) (permitting a parent who is a citizen of the United States to apply for naturalization on behalf of a child born outside of the United States who has not acquired citizenship automatically under INA sec. 320, 8 U.S.C. sec. 1431 (2006) (relating to children born outside of the United States and residing permanently in the United States)).Petitioners have another child, their tenth, who was born in November 2008 and became a U.S. citizen in October 2009.↩3. See generallysec. 6013 (permitting joint returns by husband and wife). Seesec. 6013(g)↩ (permitting an election to treat a nonresident alien individual as a resident of the United States).4. Other adjustments to income made by respondent in the notice of deficiency are without tax effect given our disposition of the issues discussed infra↩ in the text.5. Because petitioners did not challenge either the additions to tax or the penalties, those matters are deemed to be conceded. SeeRule 34(b)(4) ("Any issue not raised in the assignments of error shall be deemed to be conceded"); see also Funk v. Commissioner, 123 T.C. 213">123 T.C. 213, 217-218 (2004) (applying the Swain rationale to an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1)); Swain v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 358">118 T.C. 358, 364-365 (2002) (relieving the Commissioner of any burden of production under sec. 7491(c) as to the accuracy-related penalty under sec. 6662(a)↩ "[i]f an individual does not challenge a penalty by assigning error to it (and is, therefore, deemed to concede the penalty)"). Also, in their Objection to respondent's summary judgment motion, petitioners do not seek to raise any issue regarding the additions to tax or the accuracy-related penalties even though respondent argues in his motion that petitioners should be deemed to have conceded them.6. Secs. 151 and 152 were amended by the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-311, sec. 206, 118 Stat. at 1166, 1176↩, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2004. The amendments, however, do not affect our disposition of the issue before us, and the statutory references in the text apply to all four taxable years in issue.7. Sec. 24 was amended by the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, sec. 101, 118 Stat. at 1167↩, with certain amendments being effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2004. These amendments, however, do not affect our disposition of the issue before us, and the statutory references in the text apply to all four taxable years in issue.