Court Opinion

ID: 5093798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 16:26:49.288394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:43.344426
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM:
W.M. Giltner appeals from his jury conviction of trafficking drugs in the second degree, a class A felony under § 195.223.2(2), RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced Mr. Giltner to a thirty-year term of imprisonment, in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. On appeal, Mr. Giltner contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the cocaine discovered in *586his vehicle because its discovery was the result of an unconstitutional pretextual search. As his second point on appeal, Mr. Giltner alleges that the trial court erred in submitting a jury instruction of trafficking in cocaine salts because he was charged with trafficking in cocaine base. Finally, Mr. Gilt-ner contests the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction because there was no evidence that he possessed cocaine base.
None of Mr. Giltner’s points are meritorious and a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).