Court Opinion

ID: 9303449
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:14:30.306619+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:46.896701
License: Public Domain

NEWMAN, District Judge.
The question raised on the motion to remand in this case is that of the jurisdictional amount. It is a suit by the Southern Cash Register Company; which sells the Hailwood Cash Register, against Hugh Montgomery, as the agent and representative of the National Cash Register Company. The declaration has two counts, and possibly it may be said to have three, each claiming $1,900 by way of damages for interference in different ways with its business. The petition for removal sets out the amount in controversy is $3,800, and this is true, independently of anything else contained in the declaration, by paragraph 7. This paragraph, which concludes the petition, except the prayer for process, is as follows:
“Petitioners show that by and because of the aforesaid willful, malicious, Illegal, fraudulent, and false statements, acts, conduct, and doings of said defendant, petitioners were injured and damaged in their present and accrued sales and business in the sum of $1,900, and that for said causes and in like manner said petitioners were and are injured and damaged in their future sales, character, reputation, and business in the aforesaid sum of $1,900.”
*701• It seems from this that plaintiff would have the right to recover, if it has any right to recover at all, $1,900 for injury to its business up to the time of bringing its suit, and $1,900 injury and damage thereafter, making the total sum $3,800. Certainly this is claimed in the declaration.
It appears to me that the necessary jurisdictional amount is involved in this case, and the motion to remand on the ground that it is not so involved will be denied.