Court Opinion

ID: 4827690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-22 14:58:28.270011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:17.906926
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm, in part, the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the appellant’s designation as a sexual offender for count II (unlawful use of a two-way communications device) on the written judgment and sentence, as that offense does not qualify for sexual offender designation under section 943,0435(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2012). Because it is a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Bauder v. State, 983 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part with directions.
ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., concur.