Court Opinion

ID: 4069697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-30 00:46:59.281697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:17.249423
License: Public Domain

Order entered May 18, 2015

                                            In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                          Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      No. 05-15-00074-CR

                                 RAYFORD HIGH, Appellant

                                              V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                      On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
                                   Dallas County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. F12-57938-Y

                                          ORDER
       By order entered March 26, 2015, the Court directed court reporter Catherine Vuchie

to file, within thirty days a supplemental reporter’s record of the October 23, 2014 hearing on

appellant’s amended motion to reconsider the motion to suppress. In the event no notes were

available regarding the requested hearing, Vuchie was directed to file a letter stating that the

requested supplemental reporter’s record could be filed. To date, Vuchie has not complied with

the Court’s order.

       Because the supplemental reporter’s record has not been filed within the time allowed,

the trial court is ORDERED to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been

deprived of the supplemental reporter’s record because of ineffective assistance of counsel,

indigence, or for any other reason.
       The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a

finding to that effect.

       If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the

reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall

make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to

take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include

appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine

whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

       The trial court shall next determine: (1) whether appellant requested preparation of the

reporter’s record; (2) the date such request was made; and (3) whether appellant, if not indigent,

paid or made arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.3, 37.3.

       The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of the court reporter who

recorded the October 23, 2014 hearing on appellant’s amended motion to reconsider the motion

to suppress; (2) whether the notes from the hearing are available; (3) if available, whether the

notes can be transcribed; (4) the name and address of the court reporter who will transcribe the

notes; (5) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (6) the

earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

       We ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court a supplemental clerk’s record,

containing the written findings of fact, any recommendations, any supporting documentation,

and any orders within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
       This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is

received, whichever is earlier.

       The Court will reset the due date for appellant’s brief after this appeal is reinstated.

                                                      /s/     LANA MYERS
                                                              JUSTICE