Court Opinion

ID: 4012119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 11:16:11.129658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:18.920282
License: Public Domain

These five cases, here on direct appeal, are in the same condition. Records for the appeals were filed with the clerk of the district court November 9, 1935. The records were filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court January 17, 1936. In each case the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record was not filed in this court within sixty days after it was filed in the trial court, as required by statute and rule. Sec. 89-4910, R.S. 1931; Rule 35, 42 Wyo. 538.
It is shown by affidavit that, after the records were *Page 43 
filed in the district court, a stenographer was permitted to take them to Driggs, Idaho, to prepare abstracts of the records; after the abstracts were prepared the weather became so severe that for 18 days there was no mail service from Driggs, and for that reason the stenographer was unable to return the records to the clerk of the district court until about January 11, 1936, after the expiration of the time for filing the records in this court. The records were received by our clerk on January 13, but the filing fee was not paid until January 17.
Under these facts we cannot hold that the failure to comply with the rule can be excused. See Porter v. Carstensen, 44 Wyo. 49,  8 P.2d 446; Samuel v. Christensen-Garing, 47 Wyo. 331,37 P.2d 680.
Appeals dismissed.