Court Opinion

ID: 1007846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:31:24.850269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:16.919354
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6528

BO LIN,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-02-
37-L)

Submitted:   June 13, 2002                 Decided:   June 19, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bo Lin, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Bo Lin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Lin v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-37-L (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2