Court Opinion

ID: 9404525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-23 09:11:52.704867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:15.004124
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                          TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                 No. 10-23-00063-CR

                     EX PARTE TERRY LEE EDDINGTON

                            From the 77th District Court
                             Limestone County, Texas
                              Trial Court No. 32534-A

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

       The legally significant facts and the legal issues in this appeal are not different

from those in Ex Parte Thompson, No. 10-22-00162-CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 7415 (Tex.

App.—Waco, Oct. 5, 2022, no pet.) (not designated for publication) and Ex Parte Valero,

No. 08-22-00172-CR, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 901 (Tex. App.—El Paso, Feb. 13, 2023, pet.

granted) (not designated for publication). The parties are familiar with the facts and the

issues as argued. Accordingly, there is no need to reiterate them in this memorandum

opinion. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4. The issue raised by Eddington in this proceeding is not

cognizable via a pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus. See Ex Parte Valero, 2023

Tex. App. LEXIS 901, *7-10; Ex Parte Thompson, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 7415, *8.

Accordingly Eddington’s sole issue is overruled, and the trial court’s order denying
Eddington’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

                                         TOM GRAY
                                         Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson, and
       Justice Smith
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed June 21, 2023
Do not publish
[OT06]

Ex parte Eddington                                                 Page 2