Court Opinion

ID: 2964391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:24:59.044994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:43.894608
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

        October 10, 1996        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1579

                              IN RE CAPE COD MAIL, INC.,

                                       Debtor,

                                  ROBERT G. HAYDUK,

                                      Appellant,

                                          v.

                              PATRICK M. BUTLER, ET AL.,

                                      Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Robert G. Hayduk on brief for appellant.
            ________________
            John F. Cullen and Cullen & Cullen on brief for appellee.
            ______________     _______________

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per  Curiam.   Plaintiff-appellant  Cape  Cod Mail,
                      ___________

            Inc.,  appeals from  the  dismissal of  its summary  judgment

            appeals, the discharge of special counsel, and the imposition

            of sanctions on special counsel.  We affirm for substantially

            the reasons  stated in the  district court's April  24, 1996,

            Memorandum  and  Order.   Appellee's  Motion  to Adopt  Lower

            Court's Decision for Appellees' Brief is denied as moot.

                      Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                      ________