Court Opinion

ID: 9890696
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-14 00:00:27.052381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.597931
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40022         Document: 00516930886             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/13/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                               Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                             FILED
                                                                                      October 13, 2023
                                       No. 23-40022
                                     Summary Calendar                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ivan Villegas,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Eastern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:19-CR-276-3
                      ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Villegas has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Villegas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40022     Document: 00516930886          Page: 2    Date Filed: 10/13/2023

                                   No. 23-40022

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
          Our review reveals a clerical error in the written judgment, which does
   not reflect the district court’s dismissal of Count Two of the superseding
   indictment on the Government’s motion. The case is REMANDED for the
   limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment in accordance
   with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

                                         2