Court Opinion

ID: 8478257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:54:33.1186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.539476
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marlin Rainey appeals the district court’s order denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.