Court Opinion

ID: 1010661
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:15:11.518454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:10.580870
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 03-6488

DEMARCUS M. BROWN,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BRETT EDMONDS; N. COMER; DANIEL BRAXTON,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-132-7)

Submitted:   May 15, 2003                     Decided:   May 29, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demarcus M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court.   See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-

03-132-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2