Court Opinion

ID: 4539828
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-06-08 20:01:26.601627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:53.160388
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUN 8 2020
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    19-10258

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 1:01-cr-05137-LJO-3

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
DARWIN KEITH BUSH,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of California
                   Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted June 2, 2020**

Before:      LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

      Darwin Keith Bush appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release, as well as the 8-month sentence

and 24-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bush’s counsel has filed a brief stating

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Bush the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                  19-10258