Court Opinion

ID: 5583783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:47:27.244933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:10.009178
License: Public Domain

Pee Curiam
1. Under the facts stated in the question, the term “ accusation ” in the recognizance is broad enough to include the term “warrant.” See Cleveland v. Brown, 141 Ga. 829 (82 S. E. 243); Foole v. Gordon, 87 Ga. 277 (13 S E. 512).
2. Accordingly it should be presumed that the obligors in the bail-bond understood when they executed it that the term “ accusation ” therein referred to a “ warrant.”

All the Justices concur, except