Court Opinion

ID: 9577656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:36:49.798963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:20:59.845306
License: Public Domain

Judge WEBB
dissenting.
I dissent. I do not agree with the statement of the majority that “since defendant is not a quasi-public entity, plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to the relief prayed for, namely removal *385of the encroachment.” I believe that the rule stated in Clark v. Asheville Contracting Co., Inc., 316 N.C. 475, 342 S.E. 2d 832 (1986) governs. In determining whether to grant an injunction, the court must consider the relative convenience-inconvenience and the comparative injuries to the parties.