Court Opinion

ID: 660985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:11:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:21.435809
License: Public Domain

14 F.3d 598NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Harold SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6331.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1993.Decided Dec. 23, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville.
Harold Smith, Jr., appellant pro se.
William Corley Lucius, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Smith, No. CR-85-166-6;  CA-92-2649-3-K (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED