Court Opinion

ID: 654974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:43:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:44.626927
License: Public Domain

7 F.3d 228
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Stanley E. WILLIAMS-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.David SMITH;  Clarence L. Jackson, Jr., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-7350.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  December 4, 1992.Decided:  October 12, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, District Judge.  (CA-91-287-R)
Stanley E. Williams-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Gayl Y. Branum-Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Stanley E. Williams-Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Williams-Bey v. Smith, No. CA-91-287-R (W.D. Va.  Oct. 30, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED