Court Opinion

ID: 7242117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 05:01:36.611458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:17:51.709165
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Saris, Chief Judge.
Aleo’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order on summary judgment (Docket No. 78) is DENIED. Section 210(g)(2) of PURPA lays out the enforcement process by “[a]ny person” against an electric utility to “enforce any requirement” established by a state regulatory authority, 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3(g)(2). There is no federal statutory provision providing a private cause of action for damages against the utility independent of the PURPA enforcement scheme. Section 210(h)(1) applies only to Commission enforcement. Id. § 824a-3(h)(1).
Parties shall file proposed form of judgment by 2/6/2017.