Court Opinion

ID: 9812397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 22:39:36.684056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:24:55.578925
License: Public Domain

OPINION

PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App.1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of online solicitation of a minor and sentenced to concurrent terms of two years’ imprisonment for each count.
This Court, in Ex parte Lo, held unconstitutional the online solicitation of a minor statute for which Applicant was convicted. Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex.Crim.App.2013). Applicant, through counsel, filed this habeas application based on the Lo decision and asks that his convictions be set aside. The trial court recommends granting relief. After considering the trial court’s findings and the parties’ objections and responses regarding them, this Court agrees with the trial court, and relief is granted.
The judgments for both counts in Cause No. 10-05-05347-CR in the 410th District Court of Montgomery County are set aside. Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Montgomery County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment so that the indictment may be disposed of in accordance with this Court’s opinion in Ex parte Lo. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
COCHRAN, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
KELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., joined.