Court Opinion

ID: 4585268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-10 20:00:32.02952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:04.133124
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-10649      Date Filed: 11/10/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 20-10649
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00023=PGB-EJK-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

ANTHONY NICHOLAS, JR.,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                              (November 10, 2020)

Before MARTIN, NEWSOM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Roger L. Weeden, appointed counsel for Anthony Nicholas, Jr., in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
          USCA11 Case: 20-10649      Date Filed: 11/10/2020   Page: 2 of 2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Nicholas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2