Court Opinion

ID: 9412199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-28 20:08:17.273218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:30.381389
License: Public Domain

Barker v Gervera (2023 NY Slip Op 03990)

Barker v Gervera

2023 NY Slip Op 03990

Decided on July 28, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 28, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND OGDEN, JJ.

232 CA 22-00301

[*1]DAVID BARKER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
vANTHONY . GERVERA, AMANDA D. GERVERA AND FARM CREDIT EAST, ACA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.) 

LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, FAYETTEVILLE (MICHAEL J. LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (MATTHEW W. O'NEIL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ANTHONY V. GERVERA AND AMANDA D. GERVERA. 
HANCOCK & ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT FARM CREDIT EAST, ACA. 

	Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered February 17, 2022. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant Farm Credit East, ACA to dismiss the action against it and granted in part the motion of defendants Anthony V. Gervera and Amanda D. Gervera to dismiss the action against them. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion of defendant Farm Credit East, ACA, is denied, the action against that defendant is reinstated, and the motion of defendants Anthony V. Gervera and Amanda D. Gervera is denied in its entirety.
Same memorandum as in Barker v Gervera ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 28, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).
Entered: July 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court