Court Opinion

ID: 8890628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 23:07:10.136982+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:11.124968
License: Public Domain

RICH, Judge
(dissenting).
I would affirm on the unanimous opinion of the board, 167 USPQ 563 (1970). The board considered the voluminous sales under the JIFFY mark which, no doubt, have made it well known. The better known it is, the less likelihood of confusion there would be, in my opinion, assuming concurrent use of JIF-LOK. Compare Lever Brothers Co. v. Producers Chemical Service, 283 F.2d 879, 48 CCPA 744 (1960), and In re General Electric Co., 304 F.2d 688, 49 CCPA 1186 (1962).