Court Opinion

ID: 51066
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:01:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:00.717769
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  In this multi-party, multi-issue, highly contentious lawsuit, the instant appeal is a narrow one: The district court granted the summary judgment motion of Defendant-Appellee John Smithee, one of myriad defendants, including his law firm, resulting in a take-nothing judgment which the court certified as final pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). It is axiomatic that the lawsuit continues against the remaining defendants.
 

  We have sifted through pertinent portions of the record on appeal and the multitude of claims, charges, accusations, and legal theories set forth in the appellate brief of Plaintiff-Appellant, and we have concluded that the district court correctly granted the summary judgment here at issue. For essentially the same reasons explained by the district court, its judgment in favor of Smithee, pursuant to Rule 54(b), is
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.