Court Opinion

ID: 5670655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 14:12:05.710334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:35.733394
License: Public Domain

Daniels, J.
The answer of the defendant in this action was served on the 17th of November, 1888, and the notice of motion to make the complaint more definite and certain was not given until the latter part of January, 1889. This entitled the plaintiff to a denial of the motion, for, by rule 22 of the general rules of practice, a motion of this description is required to be made before the service of a demurrer or an answer. The order, accordingly, should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and also the disbursements.
Van Brunt, Ch. J., and Barrett, J., concur.