Court Opinion

ID: 9902081
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-22 21:00:51.62467+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:45.062087
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321      Doc: 20         Filed: 11/21/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1321

        ALLISON BLANCHARD,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00649-TSE-IDD)

        Submitted: November 16, 2023                                Decided: November 21, 2023

        Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Kristen J. Farr, THE SPIGGLE LAW FIRM, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for
        Appellant. Heather K. Bardot, MCGAVIN, BOYCE, BARDOT, THORSEN & KATZ,
        P.C., Fairfax, Virginia; Virginia M. Sadler, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington,
        Virginia, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321      Doc: 20         Filed: 11/21/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Allison Blanchard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary

        judgment on Blanchard’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title

        VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; the American with

        Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213; and the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29

        U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Blanchard v. Arlington Cnty., Va., No.

        1:21-cv-00649-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2