Court Opinion

ID: 7417559
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:38:15.245801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:17.393884
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Pi-ocedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The grounds upon which relief is sought are an attempt to review the sufficiency of the evidence.
A motion under Criminal Procedure Rule I may not be used as a substitute for an appeal upon the merits. Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 27; Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730.
Affirmed.