Court Opinion

ID: 107867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 17:11:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:22.851910
License: Public Domain

394 U.S. 102
89 S.Ct. 926
22 L.Ed.2d 112
Eugene HOLDEN et al.v.Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al.
No. 945.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 3, 1969

Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

1
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.