Court Opinion

ID: 1001750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:00:26.338591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:05.886731
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6353

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; UNITED
STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-96-332-2)

Submitted:   May 25, 2000                     Decided:   June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Haywood Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-

nying his motion for reconsideration.   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Williams v. Office of the United States Attorney, No. CA-96-332-2

(E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2