Court Opinion

ID: 8441142
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:30:32.271104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.262535
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.