Court Opinion

ID: 8066845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 10:51:36.333781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:12.726975
License: Public Domain

LAUGHLIN, J.
The injunction order for the violation of which appellant has been adjudged guilty of contempt is the one considered on the appeal decided herewith. 74 N. Y. Supp. 1072. After that order was granted and served, appellant issued and mailed a circular to retail dealers in honey,' beeswax, maple sugar, and maple sirup, announcing the death of Henry P. Hildreth, which occurred several weeks before, and stating that he, as survivor,was the sole owner of the-business carried on at Nos. 120 and 122 West Broadway. It appears, by an affidavit, which is, however, controverted by the defendant,, that in one instance, at least, this circular was inclosed in an envelope.upon which was originally printed:
“After 5 days return to
Hildreth, McCaul Co.,
Jos. M. McCaul, prop.
120 & 122 West Broadway,
New York.”
—And upon which the name Hildreth was left plainly legible, although some blue ink had been spread over it. The court was justified in finding that this circular thus issued was calculated and intended to continue the deception which it was the design of the injunction order to prevent, and the defendant was properly adjudged guilty of contempt. Devlin v. Devlin, 69 N. Y. 212, 25 Am. Rep. 173.
The order should therefore be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.