Court Opinion

ID: 9942698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-21 19:01:13.151626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:28.892566
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-20320         Document: 46-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/21/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                 ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                  No. 23-20320                             February 21, 2024
                                Summary Calendar
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                ____________                                      Clerk

United States of America,

                                                                 Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                        versus

Domingo Rios-Hernandez,

                                          Defendant—Appellant.
                 ______________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 4:20-CR-362-1
                 ______________________________

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Domingo Rios-
Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rios-Hernandez has submitted a letter

        _____________________
       *
           Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 23-20320       Document: 46-1      Page: 2    Date Filed: 02/21/2024

                                No. 23-20320

to counsel that we construe as a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rios-
Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5th Cir. R. 42.2.
      As counsel asserts, however, there is a clerical error in the judgment.
The written judgment does not reflect the district court’s oral
recommendation that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) evaluate Rios-Hernandez
to determine if he should be sent to a BOP medical facility for treatment of
his health condition. Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the
clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Powell, 354 F.3d 362, 371-72 (5th
Cir. 2003).

                                     2