Court Opinion

ID: 8635677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:44:49.979506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:55.047405
License: Public Domain

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.
Upon the decision made in this cause, by the supreme court, it is altogether just that the damages sustained by the Pennsylvania should be brought into the apportionment which, by the rules of admiralty, follows when both vessels are guilty of fault which contributes to the disaster. I regard the opinion of the supreme court in the case of The Sapphire, IS Wall. [85 U. S.] 51, as a plain recognition of the competency of this court to allow the owners of the Pennsylvania to bring their damages to the attention of the court, in this stage of the proceedings, with a view to including them in such apportionment. It is just that it should be so. The mandate directs proceedings here in conformity to the opinion. The opinion finds facts upon which the damages should be divided. But, the privilege now given should not disturb the proceedings in any other respect, nor work any disadvantage to the libellants beyond the ascertainment and allowance of those damages in the apportionment. On those terms and conditions, let the answer be amended, by an averment that the Pennsylvania was injured by the collision mentioned in the libel, and let an order of reference be entered to ascertain the amount of such damages. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, such damages will be brought into the apportionment, with the damages already found to have been sustained by the libellants.