Court Opinion

ID: 506819
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:55:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:20.896452
License: Public Domain

848 F.2d 188
Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.Douglas D. BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-2192.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 5, 1988.

Before LIVELY, MERRITT and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
The plaintiff moves to strike counsel for the defendant and the defendant's brief on appeal from the district court's judgment dismissing this civil rights case.  42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  The appeal has been referred to panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.  After an examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2
In the plaintiff's motion to strike, he argues that the defendant failed to file an answer in the district court and, therefore, is not entitled to defend this appeal.  The defendant did file a motion to dismiss in the district court.  Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction should be filed before an answer is filed.  Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to defend this appeal.

3
In his complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant illegally repossessed the plaintiff's truck without a prior judicial hearing.  The district court entered an opinion holding that the defendant did not act under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.   See Gary v. Darnell, 505 F.2d 741, 742 (6th Cir.1974);  Turner v. Impala Motors, 503 F.2d 607, 611 (6th Cir.1974).  We agree with the conclusions of the district court for the reasons stated in its opinion.

4
The motion to strike is denied.  The judgment of the district court is affirmed under Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, because the issues are not substantial and do not require oral argument.