Court Opinion

ID: 9380424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-18 00:00:23.209497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:24.926007
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10818         Document: 00516681103             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-10818                                   FILED
                                     Summary Calendar                            March 17, 2023
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ikekeem Leotis Curtis,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:21-CR-287-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Wilson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The attorney appointed to represent Ikekeem Leotis Curtis has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Curtis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10818     Document: 00516681103         Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/17/2023

                                  No. 22-10818

   Curtis’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2