Court Opinion

ID: 6113207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-27 16:09:35.196205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:50.397354
License: Public Domain

People v Derverger (2022 NY Slip Op 00480)

People v Derverger

2022 NY Slip Op 00480

Decided on January 27, 2022

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered:January 27, 2022

112070
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vDevon Derverger, Appellant.

Calendar Date:December 30, 2021

Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

Thomas R. Villecco, Albany, for appellant.
P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered May 15, 2019, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree and purportedly waived the right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant to six years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel's brief, we disagree. We find that there is an issue of arguable merit with respect to the validity of defendant's appeal waiver that may potentially impact other issues that may be raised, such as the severity of the sentence (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Dye, 197 AD3d 1436, 1436 [2021]). Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490, 492-493 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638-639 [2001]; see generally People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).
Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.