Court Opinion

ID: 8467376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 10:11:23.181358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.453244
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Efrain Palacios Soto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Soto’s motion to reopen where Soto failed to show he was prejudiced by his former representative’s performance. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (presumption of prejudice rebutted where alien could not demonstrate plausible grounds for relief).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.