Court Opinion

ID: 1016999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:57:47.431583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:46.943161
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Edward W. Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his civil action for failure to timely serve process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Anderson v. City of Rock Hill,
  
  No. CA-04-22892-0 (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED