Court Opinion

ID: 5952142
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 06:25:13.873672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:44.480445
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered April 20, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, under Indictment No. 8857/89, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court (Kay, J.), rendered July 20, 1989, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under S.C.I. No. 4580/88.
Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for *996leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.