Court Opinion

ID: 1005402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:56:07.158455+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:33.829791
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6855

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JACK TRAYNUM HOWARD,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-94-444-JFM, CA-00-3088-JFM)

Submitted:   September 20, 2001       Decided:   September 27, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Traynum Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jack Traynum Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Howard, Nos. CR-94-444-

JFM; CA-00-3088-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 21, 2001).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2