Court Opinion

ID: 9918519
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-14 08:12:47.933126+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:14.108479
License: Public Domain

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 9, 2024

                                      In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-23-00370-CV

                          TERRY GENTRY, Appellant

                                        V.
   FREEPORT LNG EXPANSION, L.P., AND HAMILTON - RYKER IT
                 SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellees

                    On Appeal from the 234th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2020-66675

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of
appellees. The plaintiff in the underlying proceeding, Terry Gentry, died while the
case was pending in the trial court. Gentry’s daughter and heir, Kaylie Gentry,
filed a suggestion of death and proceeded in her father’s place. See Tex. R. Civ. P.
151. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and Kaylie
Gentry filed a notice of appeal.
      After the judgment was entered, but before the notice of appeal was filed,
The Galveston County Probate Court appointed Ricky Gentry as the Dependent
Administrator of Terry’s Gentry’s estate. Ricky Gentry is Terry Gentry’s son and
Kaylie Gentry’s brother.

      On August 3, 2023, upon motion of appellee, we abated this appeal and
ordered counsel for decedent-appellant’s son and independent executor of
decedent-appellant’s estate, Ricky Gentry, to appear and inform this court whether
decedent-appellant’s daughter and heir, Kaylie Gentry, has authority to proceed in
this appeal. On August 21, 2023, counsel for Kaylie Gentry file a motion to extend
the abatement period to allow for more time for counsel for Ricky Gentry and
Kaylie Gentry to determine their approach to proceed in this appeal. We granted
the motion and noted that if either counsel for Ricky Gentry or Kaylie Gentry does
not provide this court with authority to proceed in this appeal within 30 days of
that order, the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice. See Murphy
v. Muprphy, 21 S.W.3d 797, 798 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, Order);
Durham v. Durham, No. 07-14-00346-CV, 2015 WL 4930981 (Tex. App.—
Amarillo Aug. 14, 2015, Order); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (providing for involuntary
dismissal of appeal for failure to comply with court order).

      As of today, neither counsel for Ricky Gentry nor Kaylie Gentry has
provided this court with authority to proceed. On December 18, 2023, appellee
Hamilton – Ryker IT Solutions, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. On December
20, 2023, Kaylie Gentry filed a response in opposition stating that Kaylie and
Ricky have been unable to reach an agreement as to who should continue the
appeal.

      This court has given the Gentrys ample time to comply with our order to
provide authority to proceed. We grant appellee’s motion, reinstate, and dismiss

                                          2
the appeal. See Spigener v. Ray, No. 10-08-00280-CV, 2009 WL 4353751 at *1
(Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 25, 2009).

      The appeal is dismissed.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Poissant.

                                        3