Court Opinion

ID: 9956015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-30 09:15:53.806926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:03.606093
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00298-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

EAST TEXAS RANCH, LP,                                     §   APPEAL FROM THE 173RD
APPELLANT

V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ARLIS A. JONES,
APPELLEE                                                  §   HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM

         Appellant, East Texas Ranch, LP, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal in which it states
that it no longer desires to pursue the appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered March 28, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                 COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                          MARCH 28, 2024

                                        NO. 12-23-00298-CV

                                   EAST TEXAS RANCH, LP,
                                          Appellant
                                             V.
                                      ARLIS A. JONES,
                                          Appellee

                               Appeal from the 173rd District Court
                    of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV20-0498-173)

                   THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party
incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J