Court Opinion

ID: 6345861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-01 19:07:44.598903+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:20.799433
License: Public Domain

People v Allen (2022 NY Slip Op 03524)

People v Allen

2022 NY Slip Op 03524

Decided on June 1, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2021-04136
 (Ind. No. 8281/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vDivine Allen, appellant. 

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Michael Bierce of counsel; Darci Siegel on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Evelyn J. Laporte, J.), imposed May 13, 2021, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the portion of the sentence imposing a period of three years of probation plus 20 sessions with the Brooklyn Justice Initiatives program was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court