Court Opinion

ID: 996845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:56:39.762753+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:19.880736
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6489

THOMAS EUGENE LANGSTON,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN, MECKLENBURG CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-97-1359-AM)

Submitted:   October 27, 1998          Decided:     November 13, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Eugene Langston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Thomas Eugene Langston seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Langston v. Warden, No. CA-97-

1359-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2