Court Opinion

ID: 8029038
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:58:44.462801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:54.478273
License: Public Domain

On April 10, 1997, the defendant was sentenced to a ten (10) year commitment to the Department of Corrections, with five (5) years ■suspended. This sentence shall run concurrently to the sentence imposed in ADC-97-24.
On April 14, 2000, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Peter Bovingdon. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive."
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Chairman, Hon. Marge Johnson, Member, Hon. David Cybulski, Alt. Member, Hon. Robert Boyd.