Court Opinion

ID: 7694666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 18:44:19.940456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:46.782473
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The order under review, which denied a motion to set aside a clerk’s default, is reversed because the default was improperly secured without notice after the plaintiff became aware that the defendant was or would be represented by counsel and desired actively to defend the case. Sklar v. Brawley, 651 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Ole, Inc. v. Yariv, 566 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).