Court Opinion

ID: 9963149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-24 17:04:29.122209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:41.460461
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  April 24, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1128. CURTIS HAYES v. LARKIN STREET HOMES, LLC.

      This case arose from a dispossessory suit that Larkin Street Homes, LLC filed
in magistrate court against Curtis Hayes. After Hayes raised equitable claims in his
answer and counterclaim, the magistrate court transferred the case to superior court.
Larkin then moved to dismiss Hayes’s defenses and counterclaim, compel payment
of rent into the court, and remand the case to the magistrate court. In October 2023,
the superior court granted Larkin’s motion and issued a writ of possession against
Hayes. Hayes filed a notice of appeal from that order, and Larkin filed a motion to
dismiss the appeal in the superior court, arguing that Hayes had failed to pay costs and
that its claim for unpaid rent remained pending. In February 2024, the court granted
Larkin’s motion, and dismissed the appeal. From that order, Hayes appeals. This
Court, however, lacks jurisdiction.
      Under Georgia law, “a trial court’s order dismissing a properly filed direct
appeal is itself subject to a direct appeal.” American Med. Security Group v. Parker, 284
Ga. 102, 103 (2) (663 SE2d 697) (2008). However, “a trial court’s order dismissing
an improperly filed direct appeal should be considered an interlocutory order and is
not subject to a direct appeal.” Id. Here, as the dismissal order makes clear, though
the court had entered a writ of possession, the issue of monetary damages remained
pending. Because the case was still pending, Hayes was required to file an application
for interlocutory review under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to appeal the order. See generally
Howard v. Collins, 170 Ga. App. 362, 362-363 (317 SE2d 630) (1984) (when a claim for
rent remained pending, the issuance of a writ of possession was an interlocutory order
which was appealable only under the procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)). In
this case, the October 2023 order was not a final order, thus the trial court’s February
2024 order dismissing Hayes’ s appeal is not subject to direct appeal. See id.
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                          Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                      04/24/2024
                                                   I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                                   Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                          , Clerk.