Court Opinion

ID: 9513480
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:36:20.963122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:52.399008
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, Justice,
concurring in the result.
[¶ 15] The majority imposes a rather curious “remedy.” The matter is remanded to the Bureau to redo what was done right as a remedy for that which was done wrong. The remedy imposed is the one advocated by the concurring and dissenting opinion in Scott v. North Dakota Workers Comp. Bureau, 1998 ND 221, ¶¶ 26-30, 587 N.W.2d 153 (VandeWalle, C.J., concurring and dissenting), but rejected by the Scott majority. Nevertheless, I reluctantly conclude some “remedy” is better than no remedy, and I concur in the result.
[¶ 16] WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, J„ concurs.