Court Opinion

ID: 625278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-03-13 23:21:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:10.599435
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that substantial evidence supports the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission’s (“OSHRC”) finding that petitioner violated the two OSHA standards at issue in this appeal. We also find no error in the OSHRC’s legal conclusions. Aceord
   
   *320
   
  ingly, the petition for review from the May 19, 2011 OSHRC order is DENIED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.