Court Opinion

ID: 9684523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:59:41.459741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:56.647882
License: Public Domain

ROBERTS, Judge
(dissenting).
The majority overrules the appellant’s motion for rehearing without written opinion.
I cannot agree with the majority’s disposition of the extraneous offense issue. The subsequent extraneous offense fails to meet the standards of admissibility established by this Court. See Ford v. State, 484 S.W.2d 727 (Tex.Cr.App.1972) and Newman v. State, 485 S.W.2d 576 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). Further, I object to the Court’s holding that appellant “waived” his right to complain about the admission of this testimony. I would grant the appellant’s motion for rehearing.