Court Opinion

ID: 8447102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:08:05.480668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:55.954318
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner’s third motion to reopen exceeds the statutorily established numerical limit and does not raise one of the statutory exceptions thereto. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Judge Rymer concurs in the result.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.