Court Opinion

ID: 9650278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 15:28:19.419554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:09.833086
License: Public Domain

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
It has been and remains my intention to dissent from the majority’s disposition of this case, principally because of my conviction that the majority sorely misconceives our proper review role in cases of this nature.
The question of the scope of our review is among the issues which now are pending before the court en banc in Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service Commission, No. 10490, D.C.App., 380 A.2d 126. It is my belief that we should not dispose of this case until the en banc case has been resolved. The majority, nonetheless, has elected to publish its opinion before the preparation of my dissent. It does so under Part VII, Paragraph G, of our new Internal Operating Procedures (from the adoption of which I dissent).
I shall write and release my dissent in this case as soon as feasible after the court’s resolution of the en banc proceeding in No. 10490.