Court Opinion

ID: 2950547
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:45:04.039977+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:47.746160
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-74,676-03

                        EX PARTE JASON EARL WOOLEY, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 997,161 IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Wooley v. State, 223 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. granted). This Court

reversed and remanded the case. Wooley v. State, 273 S.W.3d 260 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Following remand, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals again affirmed Applicant’s conviction. Wooley

v. State, 14-06-00088-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 22, 2009)(not designated for
                                                                                                       2

publication).

        Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to inform Applicant

that he had a right to file a petition for discretionary review.

        Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. The trial court has entered findings

of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel was not deficient. The trial court’s findings are

not supported by the record. Based on this Court’s independent review of the entire record, this

Court finds that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been

affirmed and failed to provide Applicant notice of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary

review. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

        We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-06-

00088-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 997,161 from the 176th District Court of Harris

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: April 29, 2015
Do not publish