Court Opinion

ID: 6100809
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 21:51:12.647213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:34.222754
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), rendered June 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford plea. We reject that contention. Here, the record establishes that “defendant’s Alford plea was ‘the product of a voluntary and rational choice, and the record before the court contains strong evidence of actual guilt’ ” (People v Smith, 26 AD3d 746, 747 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 763 [2006]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, there is no dispute that the crime occurred in Steuben County, and nothing in the plea colloquy cast doubt on the State’s power to prosecute the case (cf. People v Harvey, 124 AD3d 1393, 1394 [2015]).
Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Curran, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.