Court Opinion

ID: 2557747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:21:21.011912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:36:10.017435
License: Public Domain

8 N.Y.3d 1003 (2007)
In the Matter of PRITPAL KAINTH, Appellant,
v.
INDER KAINTH, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted April 2, 2007.
Decided June 7, 2007.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).