Court Opinion

ID: 2872018
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 04:05:56.274471+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:44.909034
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-05-00065-CV

                              Josephine Douglas-Peters, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                James Nathaniel Peters, Appellee

 FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
      NO. 01-1528-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                               DISSENTING OPINION

               While I agree with the majority’s disposition of Douglas’s other issues and Peters’s

request for damages under Rule 45, I disagree with its disposition of Douglas’s second issue and,

accordingly, respectfully dissent from the majority’s judgment of reversal. Given the absence of a

reporter’s record, the state of the clerk’s record, and the presumptions that operate in support of the

district court’s judgment in such circumstances, I would affirm.

                                               __________________________________________

                                               Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Filed: March 2, 2006