Court Opinion

ID: 148562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-06-15 00:01:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:25.690990
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 14 2010

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 09-10433

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00004-ARM

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
KISHA LYN MASGA KING,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands
                  Alex R. Munson, Chief District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted May 25, 2010 **

Before:        CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

       Kisha Lyn Masga King appeals from the revocation of her supervised

release and the 9-month term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation. Pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), King’s counsel has filed a brief

stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    09-10433