Court Opinion

ID: 9409595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-18 19:09:12.189817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:51.671510
License: Public Domain

:7j ORIGINAL                                                07/18/2023

            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA                                    Case Number: OP 23-0362

                                         OP 23-0362
                                                                         FILED
 SAUL JAMES DOOLING                                                        JUL 1 8 2023
                                                                        Bowen Greenwood
                                                                      Clerk of Supreme     Court
              Petitioner,                                                State of kno,, •nr,e.

       v.                                                             ORDER

 BOB OLSON, Warden, S.T.A.R.T.,

              Respondent.

       Saul James Dooling petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief, indicating that he
is entitled to more jail time than he received. He includes a copy of a misdemeanor
sentencing judgment and a February 8, 2023 sentence calculation from the Montana State
Prison (MSP) Records Department.' Upon review, we deem it appropriate to require a
response to Dooling's Petition. Therefore,
       IT IS ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of
Corrections is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which to prepare, file,
and serve a written response together with appropriate documentary exhibits.
       The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record; to Bob
Olson, Administrator; and to Saul James Dooling personally.
       DATED this 1181+1 day ofJuly, 2023.

I This Court observes that through appellate counsel, Dooling has an appeal of the first listed
conviction and sentence. State v. Dooling, No. DA 22-0635, Notice of Appeal filed Nov. 9,2022.
The Ravalli County criminal case does not appear to be at issue in this writ for habeas corpus
relief.