Court Opinion

ID: 7326530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 21:59:21.517435+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:03.951891
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-194/195 concluding that CHARLES MORRONE of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating R. l:21-l(a) (failure to maintain bona fide office) and RPC 5.5(a) (practice of law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction);
And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded that the charge of violating RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter should be dismissed;
*67And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that CHARLES MORRONE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the charge of violation of RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter is dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.