Court Opinion

ID: 998716
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:15:11.779284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:10:47.106233
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL VERTOIN SAUNDERS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
96-204, CA-98-1493-DKC)

Submitted:   May 13, 1999                   Decided:   May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Vertoin Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Stuart A. Berman, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Vertoin Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See United States v. Saunders, Nos.

CR-96-204; CA-98-1493-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1999).   We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2