Court Opinion

ID: 995030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:31:29.940008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:29.905739
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6686

CARL PETER ANTONI,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DOCTOR SAATHOFF,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-96-649-R)

Submitted:   May 14, 1998                   Decided:   May 21, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Peter Antoni, Appellant Pro Se.     Gene Rodney Young, II,
WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Antoni v. Saathoff, No. CA-96-649-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 13,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2