Court Opinion

ID: 3675634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:22:31.127758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:53.572462
License: Public Domain

The defendant, who did not appeal in forma pauperis, but has executed his appeal bond, refused to pay the costs of the transcript of the record on appeal. The clerk thereupon declined to send it up. The application for certiorari therefore presents the         (823) question whether, in criminal actions the clerk can require the cost of the transcript to be paid in advance. It is settled that in civil cases he can. Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N.C. 446; Bailey v. Brown,105 N.C. 127.
But in criminal actions it is otherwise. Code, sec. 3758, provides, "No officer shall be compelled to perform any services unless his fee be paid or tendered, except in criminal actions." This inhibition against requiring payment of fees in advance in criminal actions, we think, embraces all services, including that in question.
We are strengthened in this view by the fact that it has been held that the appeal bond secures only the costs of the appellee, and not of the appellant. Morris v. Morris, 92 N.C. 142, and cases cited, and, hence, when such bond is dispensed with in civil cases, by leave to appeal informa pauperis, the appellant may still be required by the clerk to pay for the cost of the transcript on appeal and his cost in this Court as well.Martin v. Chasteen, 75 N.C. 96; Andrews v. Whisnant, and Bailey v. Brown,supra.
The reason of this distinction is that section 212, allowing a party tosue as a pauper, exempts him from paying fees to any officer, but section 553, allowing an appeal in forma pauperis, is more restricted, and only exempts the appellant from giving bond to secure the appellee's costs, leaving him to pay his own costs, if exacted, if he chooses to appeal to another tribunal after having had gratuitous services from all officers in the lower courts.
If the same rule prevailed in criminal actions, it would follows that all appellants in such cases, as well as those appealing in forma pauperisas others, would be compelled to prepay the costs of the transcript and the costs in this Court, if demanded. Such is not our understanding of the statute. Code, sec. 3758.
An instanter certiorari should issue to bring up the transcript.
Motion allowed.
Cited: Broadwell v. Ray, 112 N.C. 192; Sanders v. Thompson, 114 N.C. 283;Speller v. Speller, 119 N.C. 358; S. v. Deyton, ib., 883; Caldwellv. Wilson, 121 N.C. 424; S. v. Neville, 175 N.C. 740; Dunn v. Clerk'sOffice, 176 N.C. 51. *Page 594 
(824)