Court Opinion

ID: 8798913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 14:23:37.336869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:03:47.531666
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
A majority of the judges are of opinion that lie proximate cause of the injury resulting in the death of James C. Cla le was the defective topping lift, for which the ship was responsible, í id that James C. Clarke was not chargeable with contributory neglige: ;e in the matter of his injury.
All the judges agree that the cause of action arising on the stea u-ship Chiswick was a maritime tort, and as it resulted in the death )f said Clarke within 20 to 30 minutes after his removal from the si: p, the right to recover damages for such tort given by section 3145, G a. St. Fla. 1906, could be enforced, and relief given in admiralty.
As the lower judge rendered no written opinion, we are not inforn d as to the basis upon which he calculated and assessed the damaj :s allowed in the decree rendered. We infer that he followed the r .e of damages as given in article 3146, Gen. St. Fla. 1906. From c ir examination and consideration of the evidence, we are not prepared o say that the damages awarded respondent were excessive.
No one of the assignments of error being well taken, the decree i )~ pealed from is affirmed.
Amendment of Decree.
On further consideration of this case, the decree heretofore rendered is amended so as to provide that the costs, including costs of transcript, sb 11 be divided equally between the appellants and appellees.