Court Opinion

ID: 2926220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:25:46.226906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:10.623591
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00085-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
MIRTA ZORILLA, 	Appellant,

v.

LAKE JAMES RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, INC.,	Appellee. 
	____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court  

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam	The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on April 16, 2009.  On July 8,
2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been
received from appellant.  
	Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 8th day of October, 2009.