Court Opinion

ID: 8427295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 03:30:23.804823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:32.638408
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Tracy Woody seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing all but two of the defendants named in the underlying civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Woody seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED