Court Opinion

ID: 673657
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:51:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:05.170787
License: Public Domain

28 F.3d 1211
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Bernard Michael CONNOLLY, a/k/a Kenneth Paul Crawford,Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-6904.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 17, 1994.Decided:  June 30, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.  Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-460-CIV-2, CR-88-138-2)
Bernard Michael Connolly, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Connolly, No. CR-88-138-2;  No. CA-91-460-CIV-2 (M.D.N.C. July 14, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Appellant's motion for summary judgment and motion for appointment of counsel