Court Opinion

ID: 3641484
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 05:58:59.622288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:19:21.232784
License: Public Domain

The evidence tended to show that on the night of 5 November, 1928, the plaintiff was a passenger in a Buick automobile, traveling along the Greenville highway toward Ayden, North Carolina, and that said automobile collided with an unlighted log truck and trailer standing upon the highway. The truck and trailer was loaded with logs, and there was testimony to the effect that one of the logs extended out about four feet beyond the trailer in a crosswise or diagonal manner, and by reason thereof when the car in which plaintiff was riding, was turned to the left to avoid the truck it struck this log protruding across the highway and resulted in serious injuries.
At the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence there was judgment of nonsuit and the plaintiff appealed.
The Veneer Company offered no evidence, and it does not appear what the relationship was between the Veneer Company and defendant, Roy Moye, who was driving the truck and trailer at the time *Page 590 
of the injury complained of. It was admitted in the answer of defendant Veneer Company "that the National Veneer Company, Inc., was to load all logs on the truck, or other means of conveyance, of said Roy Moye, with the assistance of Roy Moye in loading said logs." This admission was offered in evidence.
It is obvious that, if a truck and trailer operated upon a populous highway in the nighttime and without light, is so loaded as to allow logs or other objects placed in the truck to project beyond the line of the truck and trailer and over the highway, such loading, under the circumstances, would be a negligent act. The evidence discloses that the agents and employees of defendant Veneer Company assisted in loading the truck with knowledge that it was to be operated over and upon a populous highway and with the further knowledge that projections extending over the highway would be a present and imminent menace to travelers.
Therefore, the Court is of the opinion that the cause should have been submitted to the jury with proper instructions.
Reversed.