Court Opinion

ID: 9543052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:41:41.147804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:09:37.317542
License: Public Domain

SHEPARD, Chief Justice,
concurring in result.
I write to point out that whether the trial court ordered the new sentence in Count II consecutive to Count I instead of concurrent is a non-issue. On the date of the resentencing, Coble had finished his sentence on Count I and was continuing service of his 32-year sentence on Count II. Coble was entitled to credit time for his incarceration on Count II up to the date of the amended order. Thus, whether he became incarcerated for the balance of the eight years "concurrent with Count I" or "consecutive to Count I" is of no consequence.