Court Opinion

ID: 4034207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-16 03:03:47.563952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:13.288620
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
 

  Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that such determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. In view of this, the petition must be dismissed as moot
  
   (see Matter of Williams v Venettozzi,
  
  140 AD3d 1508, 1508 [2016];
  
   Matter of Robinson v Prack,
  
  137 AD3d 1452, 1452 [2016]). Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to this relief (see
  
   Matter of Thompson v Annucci,
  
  140 AD3d 1521, 1521 [2016];
  
   Matter of Khudan v Annucci,
  
  139 AD3d 1198, 1198 [2016]). We note, however, that any loss of good time that was imposed as part of the penalty should be restored to petitioner (see
  
   Matter of Zoccoli v Annucci,
  
  140 AD3d 1512, 1513 [2016];
  
   Matter of Clark v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision,
  
  138AD3d 1331, 1332 [2016]).
 

  Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.