Court Opinion

ID: 8431551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 07:29:24.801497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:37.721936
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Pete Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. CR-93-117 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.