Court Opinion

ID: 1001191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:52:02.962027+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:41.392569
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-6114

LEOPOLDO ALLEN,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN D. MULLER, Superintendent,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-224-5-BR)

Submitted:   March 23, 2000                 Decided:   March 31, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leopoldo Allen, Appellant Pro Se.    Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Leopoldo Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny Allen’s

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.    See Allen v. Muller, No. CA-

99-224-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2000).    We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2