Court Opinion

ID: 5934484
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 05:21:03.211988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:56.851968
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
On October 25, 1990, the respondent was convicted in the County Court, Suffolk County, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of conspiracy in the fourth degree, in violation of Penal Law § 105.10, which constitutes a class E felony. On March 14, 1991, the respondent was sentenced to a term of probation of five years, a mandatory surcharge of $102 or 15 days’ imprisonment, and continued in-patient drug treatment.
Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.
Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Scott Stadtman, admitted under the name Scott Daniel Stadtman, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Scott Stadtman is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, *3(3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.