Court Opinion

ID: 226271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:28:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:12.998660
License: Public Domain

186 F.2d 120
TIVOLI REALTY, Inc.v.PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc.,and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants.TIVOLI REALTY, Inc.v.PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.;Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.;Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.; WarnerBros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures DistributingCorp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia PicturesCorp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., andUniversal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants.I. B. ADELMANv.PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Interstate Circuit, Inc.and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., appellants.I. B. ADELMANv.PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.;Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Lowe's Inc.;Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp.; RKO Radio Pictures, Inc,; WarnerBros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures DistributingCorp.; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.; Columbia PicturesCorp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., andUniversal Film Exchange, Inc., appellants.
Nos. 10191-10194.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 3, 1950.Decided Dec. 6, 1950.

Robert E. Sher, Washington, D.C., Roy McDonald, New York City (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Hastings, Stockly, Walz & Wise, Wilmington, Del., Morris Steel, Nichols & Arsht, Wilmington, Del., Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellants.
Thurman Arnold, Washington, D.C.  (Killoran & VanBrunt, Wilmington, Del., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D.C., Thompson, Meek & Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
The order complained of is not appealable under Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated.  See the opinion filed concurrently with this in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, 186 F.2d 111, petitions for mandamus.

2
The appeals will be dismissed.