Court Opinion

ID: 4211013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-12 13:12:19.972793+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:41:03.426739
License: Public Domain

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 137 SSM 16
Rosemarie A. Herman, &c., et al.,
            Respondents,
Avon Bard LLC, et al.,
            Plaintiffs,
        v.
Julian Maurice Herman, et al.,
            Appellants,
Michael Offit, et al.,
            Defendants.
(And a Third-Party Action.)

            Submitted by John Siegal, for appellants.
            Submitted by Natasha Shishov, for respondents.

*   *   *     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,
order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in
the affirmative. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in
precluding defendant Julian Maurice Herman from participating in
the inquest to assess damages against him.   Moreover, the denial
of that defendant's cross motion was proper. Chief Judge DiFiore
and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge
Feinman took no part.

Decided October 12, 2017