Court Opinion

ID: 9805744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 18:14:12.39686+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:47:53.055981
License: Public Domain

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY
FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.:
I concur in the result reached by the Majority because I disagree with the suggestion that the holding in Walls v. Scheckler, 700 A.2d 532 (Pa.Super.1997), was “just plain wrong.” To the contrary, I believe a unanimous panel of this court correctly decided Walls, and allowance of appeal was denied by our Supreme Court in 1998. My research has disclosed no other appellate decision which calls into question its holding.1

. Walls was distinguished in Haines v. Jones, 830 A.2d 579 (Pa.Super.2003), based on the facts unique to the Haines case.