Court Opinion

ID: 9740640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:39:17.475329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:19.296548
License: Public Domain

Griffin, J.
(dissenting). I share the dissenting view of Justice Levin that authority for a city to promulgate an amortization provision cannot be found in the language of § 4i(5) of the home rule act, MCL 117.4i(5); MSA 5.2082(5). Nor can such authority be inferred, particularly in light of De Mull v City of Howell, 368 Mich 242; 118 NW2d 232 (1962). Without intimating disagreement concerning part hi of Justice Levin’s opinion, I shall reserve judgment as to questions of constitutionality until they are before this Court for decision.