Court Opinion

ID: 2926783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:38:39.374509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:42.353544
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00323-CV

                                  COURT OF APPEALS

                      THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

DELIA GORENA,                                                                             APPELLANT,

                                                     v.

BETRESSA BLACKWELL AND
JESSICA LYNN BLACKMAN,                           APPELLEES.
_____________________________________________________________

               On Appeal from the 36th District Court
                   of San Patricio County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                          Before Justices Yanez, Garza, and Vela
                            Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        Appellant, Delia Gorena, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against her

in favor of appellee, Betressa Blackwell and Jessica Lynn Blackman.1 On May 20, 2009,

        1 On October 16, 2008, this Court issued a m em orandum opinion dism issing this appeal. See
Gorena v. Blackwell, No. 13-08-00323-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7893 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi Oct. 16,
2008, no pet.). On February 9, 2009, this Court issued an order granting appellant’s m otion for rehearing and
withdrawing our previous opinion and judgm ent issued in this cause. The appeal rem ains pending before the
Court.
the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on June 5, 2008, and that the deputy clerk, Ernestina Roblez, had notified

this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.

The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to

correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was

advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this

notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered
and filed this the 2nd day of July, 2009.

                                              2