Court Opinion

ID: 9868914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 19:05:23.568377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:57.238040
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
In its motion for a rehearing seasonably filed in this court, the defendant in error expressly remits “all amounts due it except the said principal sum of $2,050 with six percent interest thereon from the 28th day of January, 1908, the date on which same was to have been *127paid, and does here now expressly waive its right to a submission of the issue of the question as to plaintiff in .error having authorized the change in the note” and asks that its motion for rehearing be granted and our judgment be reformed so as to decree to it a recovery for the sum admitted to be due, with interest from the date, January 28, 1908, when under the testimony and contention of plaintiff in error such debt, we think interest was to become due and payable. On such waiver and remittitur it logically follows that the motion should be granted and judgment so rendered.
It is therefore ordered that the motion for rehearing be and the same is hereby granted, and judgment is here rendered in favor of the Haskell National Bank, against J. L. Baldwin for the sum of $2,050, with six percent interest per annum from January 28, 1908. The costs of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals and of this writ of error to this court are adjudged against the defendant in error and all other costs are adjudged against plaintiff in error.