Court Opinion

ID: 4171884
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-05-25 19:04:52.439199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:06.025623
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s (Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ, P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc.,
  
  No. 1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED