Court Opinion

ID: 9825061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:00:47.032643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:17.709893
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
[5] The questions propounded to the-witnesses Thorne and Oliver by the defendant’s counsel as to what the defendant said at the dray stand while the defendant still had the stolen meat in his possession called for testimony that may or may not have been relevant. The court therefore cannot be put in error for sustaining. the state’s objection to. the questions -in the absence of a statement from defendant’s counsel as to the purpose of the questions, showing the relevancy of the answers sought to be elicited.
The other questions insisted upon in brief of appellant in application for rebearing are expressly and fully passed upon in the original opinion.
Application overruled.