Court Opinion

ID: 7434289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:57:14.816201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:30.667259
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendants-appellants, and having furnished appellants with copies of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellants a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that they chose in support of their appeal, and the appellant Adams having filed his response thereto, and the appellants Johnson and Wooten having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the orders or judgments appealed are hereby affirmed.