Court Opinion

ID: 2925675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:25:14.913737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:49.676490
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-00638-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
JEFFREY J. WEBB, 	Appellant,

v.

BRANDEE N. WEBB,	Appellee.
	____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court 
of San Patricio County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on December 17, 2007.  On
January 30, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  Appellant has not
responded to this notice.  Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file
a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief.  
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to file
his brief, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 17th day of April, 2008.