Court Opinion

ID: 2905032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:35:52.578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:30.492924
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-04-061 CR

____________________

EX PARTE JOHN MARTIN

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 1997

MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)
	On December 22, 2003, the trial court denied John Martin's application for writ of
habeas corpus without conducting an evidentiary hearing or issuing the writ of habeas
corpus.  We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal.  In response, John Martin filed
a brief in which he argues the merits of his application for writ of habeas corpus for denial
of Martin's constitutional right to a speedy trial.
	No appeal lies from the refusal to issue writ of habeas corpus unless the trial court
conducts an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the application. Ex parte Hargett, 819
S.W.2d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Noe v. State, 646 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. Crim. App.
1993).  The trial court did not issue a writ of habeas corpus, nor did the court conduct an
evidentiary hearing on the application for the writ.  Compare Ex parte Silva, 968 S.W.2d
367 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App.
1998).  We hold we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.  Accordingly, it is ORDERED
that the appeal be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
									PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered March 18, 2004 
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.
1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.