Court Opinion

ID: 2678130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-06-12 14:11:18.183257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:27.062766
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               June 11, 2014
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
CHARLES R. VARNEY II,                                                         OF WEST VIRGINIA

Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 11-1483 (BOR Appeal No. 2045818)
                    (Claim No. 2009079470)

BRODY MINING, LLC,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
       Petitioner Charles R. Varney II, by Reginald D. Henry, his attorney, appeals the decision
of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Brody Mining, LLC, by
Matthew L. Williams, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated September 29, 2011, in
which the Board reversed an April 7, 2011, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges reversed the claims administrator’s October 13, 2009,
decision granting Mr. Varney a 3% permanent partial disability award. The Court has carefully
reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is
mature for consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

        Mr. Varney worked as a shuttle car operator for Brody Mining, LLC. On January 5, 2009,
he was injured when he was bounced while operating a shuttle car causing him to hit his head on
the canopy of the machine. The claims administrator held the claim compensable for
sprain/strain of the neck and contusion of multiple sites and granted Mr. Varney a 3% permanent
partial disability award. On April 7, 2011, the Office of Judges reversed the claims
administrator’s decision and granted an 8% permanent partial disability award in addition to the
previous 5% permanent partial disability award.
                                                1
        The Board of Review reversed the Office of Judges’ Order and reinstated the claims
administrator’s decision that granted a 3% permanent partial disability award. On appeal, Mr.
Varney disagrees and asserts that the Board of Review erred in determining that a deduction of
prior permanent partial disability awards should be made after an evaluator has applied West
Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20 (2006) because otherwise his impairment would be
underestimated. Brody Mining, LLC maintains that the Board of Review correctly applied West
Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20 because it is clearly established that prior permanent partial
disability awards should be deducted after applying West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20.

        The Board of Review concluded that the Office of Judges’ erred in relying on the
recommendation of Bruce A. Guberman, M.D., for an 8% permanent partial disability award.
The Board of Review discredited Dr. Guberman’s recommendation because he deducted Mr.
Varney’s prior permanent partial disability award from his range of motion impairment rating
before utilizing West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20. William Hoh, M.D., found that Mr.
Varney had an 8% impairment for the cervical spine under West Virginia Code of State Rules §
85-20. He did not make a deduction for Mr. Varney’s prior permanent partial disability award.
Randall L. Short, D.O., found that Dr. Hoh properly recommend an 8% whole person
impairment under West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20 but did not deduct for Mr.
Varney’s prior award. Dr. Short concluded that the deduction of prior permanent partial
disability awards should be made after an evaluator has applied West Virginia Code of State
Rules § 85-20. Dr. Short deducted Mr. Varney’s prior 5% permanent partial disability award
from the 8% whole person impairment and recommended that Mr. Varney receive a 3%
permanent partial disability award for this claim. The Board of Review concluded that the
deduction of prior permanent partial disability awards should be performed after an evaluator
applied West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20 and reinstated the claims administrator’s
decision granting Mr. Varney a 3% permanent partial disability award. We agree with the
reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: June 11, 2014

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II
                                                2