Court Opinion

ID: 4517087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-17 19:00:18.112273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:22:15.701247
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 19-7483

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

BRIAN DAVID HILL,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:13-cr-00435-TDS-1)

Submitted: March 12, 2020                                         Decided: March 17, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to stay

the judgment pending appeal and his pro se motion for recusal related to revocation of

supervised release proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hill,

No. 1:13-cr-00435-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2