Court Opinion

ID: 9447074
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 22:24:33.169502+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:53.201371
License: Public Domain

On the Matter of Rehearing en Banc.
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the practice of this court the opinions in this case were circulated among the members of the court who did not comprise the panel in this case to determine whether they desired rehearing, Judge Kalodner excepted since he disqualified himself. Rehearing is ordered when a majority of the court so votes.
In view of the emergent circumstances of the case the members of the court who did not sit now express their views in respect to rehearing as follows. Judge McLaughlin and Judge Staley, because of the views expressed in Judge HASTIE’s opinion, vote for rehearing en banc. Judge Forman votes against rehearing en banc because of the views expressed in the majority opinion. Since the court is equally divided there will be no rehearing.