Court Opinion

ID: 9404799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-26 07:09:37.118733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:17.538944
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued June 20, 2023

                                         In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                                         For The

                            First District of Texas
                               ————————————
                                 NO. 01-22-00775-CR
                              ———————————
         EX PARTE BENJAMIN EDUARDO SANCHEZ, Appellant

                     On Appeal from the 207th District Court
                              Comal County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. C2022-1206X

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Benjamin Eduardo Sanchez appeals from the trial court’s denial of

his application for writ of habeas corpus.1 The State of Texas has filed a motion to

1
      The Texas Supreme Court transferred this appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Third
      District of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 73.001 (authorizing transfer of cases between
      courts of appeals).
dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is moot. Appellant has not filed a response

to this motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

      On July 25, 2022, appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas

corpus seeking bail reduction. Appellant alleged that he was illegally confined in

lieu of a bond in the amount of $22,000.00, which appellant claimed was excessive,

oppressive, and beyond his financial means in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth

Amendments to the United States Constitution, of the Texas Constitution, and of

Articles 1.09 and 17.15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Appellant

contends that his release was denied on August 2, 2022, but the clerk’s record does

not contain a copy of the trial court’s order.

      On November 8, 2022, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot.

The State claimed that appellant’s counsel advised the State that appellant was

released from pretrial confinement on a personal recognizance bond on or about

November 4, 2022. The State attached a System Printout and a Comal County

Jailing Record supporting the claim that appellant was released on a personal

recognizance bond.

      If ‘“the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent

developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are moot.”’ Ex parte Guerrero, 99

S.W.3d 852, 853 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (quoting Bennet

v. State, 818 S.W.3d 199, 200 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). In

                                           2
Guerrero, the appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking

a bond reduction, but the trial court subsequently reduced the bond and appellant

posted bond. See Guerrero, 99 S.W.3d at 853. The State filed a motion to dismiss

the appeal as moot and the appellate court agreed, dismissing the appeal as moot.

See id.

      Here, the documents attached to the State’s motion to dismiss indicate that

appellant was released on November 4, 2022 on personal recognizance bonds set by

the trial court. Accordingly, the issues raised in the appeal from the denial of

appellant’s writ of habeas corpus are now moot because appellant has been released

on personal recognizance bonds.

      We dismiss the appeal as moot. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           3