Court Opinion

ID: 1008896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:47:17.41511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:58.332532
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-7155

SAMUEL DAVID QUINN,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellant,

             versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
VIRGINIA,

                                                Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-02-840-2)

Submitted:    October 10, 2002               Decided:   October 21, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel David Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

      Samuel David Quinn appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.         We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Quinn v. Virginia, No. CA-02-840-2 (W.D. Va. July 23, 2002).

We   dispense   with   oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                    2