Court Opinion

ID: 38507
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:09:20+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:31.719506
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                              June 13, 2005
                      FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                      _____________________              Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                           No. 04-50390
                      _____________________

CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN, III,
Individually and as next friend
of Charles Edward Lincoln, IV,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

                               versus

ELENA KOUREMBANA LINCOLN;
LAURIE J. NOWLIN; J. RANDALL
GRIMES; MICHAEL JERGINS, Honorable,

                                          Defendants - Appellees.

                      _____________________

                           No. 04-50402
                      _____________________

CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN, III,
Individually and as next friend
of Charles Edward Lincoln, IV,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

                               versus

WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS;
MICHAEL JERGINS, Honorable;
ELENA KOUREMBANA LINCOLN;
LAURIE J. NOWLIN; J. RANDALL
GRIMES,

                                          Defendants - Appellees.
__________________________________________________________________

          Appeals from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:03-CV-407-LY
_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

     After review of the proceedings below, the briefs and oral

argument, we find no reason to disturb the judgments of the

district court.   Accordingly, its judgments are

                                                       AFFIRMED.

     *
      Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

                                 2