Court Opinion

ID: 4238925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-24 20:00:22.9024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:03.765745
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:'
 

  Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying three post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Westat, No. 8:16-cv-00158-RWT (D. Md. July 6 & 31, 2017; Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
 

  AFFIRMED