Court Opinion

ID: 4423577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-07 20:00:38.599382+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:52.113846
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-14261   Date Filed: 08/07/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 17-14261
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80227-DMM-29

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

TODD JOHN REYNOLDS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (August 7, 2019)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-14261    Date Filed: 08/07/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Robert Gershman, appointed counsel for Todd Reynolds in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Reynolds’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2