Court Opinion

ID: 9841210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-21 17:00:58.131874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:37.205907
License: Public Domain

FOR PUBLICATION

  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
       FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZACHARY KELSEY,                          No. 22-15557

         Petitioner-Appellant,          D.C. No.
                                     3:18-cv-00174-
 v.                                    MMD-CLB
                                        District of
TIM GARRETT; et al.,                     Nevada,
                                          Reno
         Respondents-Appellees.
                                           ORDER

              Filed September 21, 2023

 Before: GRABER, GOULD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit
                    Judges.
2                     KELSEY V. GARRETT

                           ORDER

    This case was originally argued to a panel consisting of
Judges Graber, Gould and Watford. Judge Watford resigned
from the court after the opinion was issued and before
Appellees filed a petition for rehearing. Judge Friedland was
drawn to replace Judge Watford pursuant to General Order
3.2(h). Judge Friedland has reviewed the briefs, record, and
video recording of the prior oral argument, as well as the
petition for rehearing and response.
    Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED.
The opinion filed on May 24, 2023, and published at 68 F.4th
1177, is hereby withdrawn, the case is resubmitted, and the
opinion is replaced with the memorandum disposition filed
concurrently with this order.1 Appellees’ petition for
rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.
   Future petitions for rehearing will be permitted under the
deadlines outlined in Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
35(c) and 40(a)(1).

1
  The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for
disposition without reargument. See Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(4)(A).