Court Opinion

ID: 9825368
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:46:42.367687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:45.029516
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Our attention is now called to the testimony of Clay Albright, where he says: “Earnest Crawford and myself had not been closer than a hundred yards of the still the officers tore up.” In' some way this evidence was overlooked in considering the appeal in *438the first instance. When this evidence is considered in conjunction with the excerpt from the court’s oral charge:
“There are some circumstances in this case which are not denied and no conflict in the evidence, and you are to consider them in the light and along with all the other testimony in the case, for instance, it is not denied that the defendant was present at this still,”
—the charge is error to a reversal. The error is so apparent as not to need citation of authority.
The original opinion is extended, the judgment of affirmance is set aside. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.