Court Opinion

ID: 1366803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:48:56.613478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:14.817291
License: Public Domain

871 P.2d 486 (1994)
127 Or. App. 83
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Ronald Wayne BIVENS, Appellant.
91CR1989FE; CA A75540.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted February 25, 1994.
Decided March 23, 1994.
David K. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause, for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Diane S. Lefkow, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause, for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.
Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.
De MUNIZ, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of intentional murder with a firearm and burglary in the first degree with a firearm, ORS 163.115; ORS 164.225; ORS 161.610, after he killed his estranged wife. Defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense after she stabbed him.
Defendant assigns error to the admission of statements that he made to a detective in a hospital room. He contends that "[t]he type of warnings contemplated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)," were required because the circumstances were "compelling," and he was in "full custody." He argues that the statements, which were made without warnings, undermined his claim of self-defense. The error, if any, was harmless. The evidence against defendant was overwhelming. Excluding the statements would not likely have changed the outcome of the trial. See State v. Hansen, 304 Or. 169, 180, 743 P.2d 157 (1987).
On the murder conviction, the trial court imposed a life sentence with a 25-year minimum term pursuant to ORS 163.115. Defendant objected, arguing that the sentence should be imposed under the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a life sentence, State v. Morgan, 316 Or. 553, 856 P.2d 612 (1993), but contends that only a corrected judgment, not resentencing is required. We agree that defendant need not be present for the entry of an amended judgment. See State v. Lyons, 124 Or.App. 598, 612 n. 16, 863 P.2d 1303 (1993). We remand for entry of a corrected judgment deleting the life sentence and imposing post-prison supervision for the remainder of defendant's life under OAR 253-05-004. The 25-year minimum term is lawful.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for entry of corrected judgment.