Court Opinion

ID: 1004127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:43.435714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:35.050264
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Calvin Angelo Coward appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to file a belated notice of appeal in his criminal case. We have reviewed the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Although the district court erroneously analyzed Coward’s motion under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) (addressing the appeal periods in civil cases), its ultimate conclusion that it lacked the authority to extend the appeal period was correct.
  
   See
  
  Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1), (4) (allowing the district
   
   *116
   
  court to extend the ten-day criminal appeal period by an additional thirty days). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order on other grounds.
  
   See United States v. Coward,
  
  No. CR-90-52-4-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED ON OTHER GROUNDS.