Court Opinion

ID: 9422208
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:01:39.637976+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:34.791328
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Clark,
concurring in part and dissenting in part as to the opinion of The Chief Justice.
Although I join in the specific overruling of Commissioner v. Wilcox, 327 U. S. 404 (1946), in The Chief Justice’s opinion, I would affirm this conviction on either of two grounds. I believe that the Court not only devitalized Wilcox, by limiting it to its facts in Rutkin v. United States, 343 U. S. 130 (1952), but that in effect the Court overruled that case sub silentio in Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U. S. 426 (1955). Even if that not be true, in my view the proof shows conclusively that petitioner, in willfully failing to correctly report his income, placed no bona fide reliance on Wilcox.