Court Opinion

ID: 7003149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 03:45:43.603708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:09:58.957152
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Ball delivered the opinion of the court. A reading of the remanding order shows that nothing was left to be determined except a question of fact, namely, the identity of the notes which were contained in said envelope. The master finds them to have been : The Wartzeck note...............$1,250.00. The second Wartzeck note......... 550.00. The Gulp note................... 1,000.00. The Reimer note................. 1,000.00. $3,800.00. This finding has been approved by the chancellor. We have carefully examined the record in this case and can not say that its weight is manifestly and clearly against the finding, and that being so, we should not and will not disturb it. Siegel v. Andrews, 78 Ill. App. 611-616; affirmed, 181 Ill. 350-356. The decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.