Court Opinion

ID: 39412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:25:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:19.556771
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 17, 2005

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 04-41728
                         Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE NARVAEZ,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 1:04-CR-597-ALL
                      --------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jose Narvaez appeals his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and (b) for illegal reentry into the United States after having

been deported after conviction for an aggravated felony.        Narvaez

asserts for the first time on appeal that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional.   The Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

controls this issue.    We must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-41728
                               -2-

and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.”

United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000)

(internal quotation and citation omitted).   Thus, this issue is

foreclosed.

     The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.