Court Opinion

ID: 7668969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 00:49:27.430686+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:08.518786
License: Public Domain

ALLFN, P.,
concurred in the results of the opinion of the court, but not in the reasons given for it. He thought that the term “conveyance” was sufficient to embrace devises. .But he was of opinion that according to Gallego’s ex’ors v. The Attorney General, 3 Leigh 450, affirmed as that case was by The Literary Fund v. Dawson, 10 Leigh 147, and Brooke v. Shacklett, 13 Gratt. 301, the bequest was void: and that this case was not embraced in the statute.
Decree affirmed.