Court Opinion

ID: 5100412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 20:46:29.152481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:48.504195
License: Public Domain

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]
 ORDER
Appellant, Steven Trust, pled guilty to violating section 195.211, RSMo 2000, sale of a controlled substance, and section 195.202, RSMo 2000, misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. He now appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).