Court Opinion

ID: 4281023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-04 19:47:00.679626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:02.932085
License: Public Domain

[Cite as In re D.A.S.H., 2018-Ohio-2141.]

                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                            TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

                                            WARREN COUNTY

IN THE MATTER OF:                                 :        CASE NO. CA2018-01-013

                D.A.S.H.                          :               DECISION
                                                                    6/4/2018
                                                  :

                                                  :

             APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                             JUVENILE DIVISION
                             Case No.15-D000105

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice
Drive, Lebanon, OH 45036, for appellee

Aaron Aldridge, 130 East Mulberry Street, Lebanon, OH 45036, for appellant

        Per Curiam.

        {¶1}    This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript

of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the

Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by

appellant's counsel.

        {¶2}    Counsel for appellant, A.T., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
                                                                       Warren CA2018-01-013

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

       {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

       S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.