Court Opinion

ID: 5165556
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 03:30:40.86672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:12.604052
License: Public Domain

[1] ORDER
[2] Appellee's motion to dismiss is denied. This appeal was timely commenced within 30 days of the filing of an order prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3[12-696.3], 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 990A[12-990A]. The trial court's March 1 ruling was not prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3[12-696.3], Mansell v. City ofLawton, 877 P.2d 1120 (Okla. 1994).
[3] HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., and ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.
[4] SIMMS, HARGRAVE and OPALA, JJ., dissent.