Court Opinion

ID: 3008744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-08 16:00:59.714183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:26.243060
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 15-1785
                    ___________________________

                             Robert W. Orlick,

                  lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                      v.

Grand Forks Housing Authority; Homestead Place, Inc.; Terry Hanson; Liz
Simpson; Brad Hillebrand; Sherrie LeQuire; Nancy Brandner; Matt Martin,

                 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees,

                         ------------------------------

                             Robert W. Orlick,

                  lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                      v.

                           Mr. Warren Hanson,

                  lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
                                  ____________

               Appeal from United States District Court
                for the District of North Dakota - Fargo
                             ____________

                     Submitted: September 30, 2015
                        Filed: October 8, 2015
                            [Unpublished]
                                    ____________

Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Robert Orlick appeals after the district court1 dismissed one of his pro se civil
actions as barred by res judicata, and dismissed another of his pro se civil actions for
failure to state a claim. He has filed an “emergency motion” on appeal. After careful
de novo review, see Laase v. Cty. of Isanti, 638 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir. 2011); Levy
v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007), we conclude that Orlick’s complaints were
properly dismissed for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The pending motion is denied.
                          ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge for the
District of North Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

                                          -2-