Court Opinion

ID: 1423892
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:04:07.675417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:06:32.383907
License: Public Domain

219 S.W.3d 784 (2007)
Kenneth BARRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88379.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 17, 2007.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
*785 Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Prior report: 157 S.W.3d 769.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Barry ("movant") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).