Court Opinion

ID: 855866
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-21 20:28:03.466745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:07.563088
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 21 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-50562

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:11-cr-01511-WQH

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
JOSE LOPEZ-ALVAREZ,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of California
                    William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted March 12, 2013 **

Before:        PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

       Jose Lopez-Alvarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 120-month sentence for importation of

heroin and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Pursuant to Anders

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Alvarez’s counsel has filed a brief

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Lopez-Alvarez the opportunity to file a pro

se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

         AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                     11-50562