Court Opinion

ID: 8677301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:53:48.658416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.119281
License: Public Domain

*213Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael B. Lesane appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lesane v. Byers, No. 2:12-cv-00508-JMC, 2014 WL 5590904 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2014). We deny Lesane’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.