Court Opinion

ID: 7359218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 05:42:57.990261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:29.952032
License: Public Domain

MANNING, J.
The petitioner is a painter employed in the department of bridges, who was suspended by the commissioner owing to the lack of funds wherewith to pay him. He is an honorably discharged veteran of the Spanish-American War, and claims that his dismissal was illegal, because, as such, he is entitled to a preference in retention over painters who- are not veterans.
His contention is not sound. Where the discharge is for lack of funds, and in the judgment of the commissioner a reduction of the force'is necessary, because he has no money to- pay the men, a veteran is not entitled to' any preference. It further appears that the petitioner has not in fact been discharged, but merely suspended from duty owing to the lack of funds, and his name has been placed upon the pre*295ferred eligible list in accordance with the provisions of the charter, that he may again be assigned to duty as soon as there is money enough to justify the employment of more help of his class. This is all he can expect under the law.
Motion for mandamus denied, without costs.