Court Opinion

ID: 9529793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:54:18.017405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:55.138116
License: Public Domain

HALL, Chief Justice,
concurring in the result:
I concur in the result only because I am not persuaded that the 1977 statutory amendments1 in any way supersede the ruling of this Court in Mecham v. Mecham.2 Nor am I convinced that the amendments otherwise relieve the res judicata effect of the divorce decree on the Department’s belated effort to seek reimbursement.
STEWART, J., concurs in the concurring opinion of HALL, C.J.

. U.C.A., 1953, § 78-45-1, et seq.

. Utah, 570 P.2d 123 (1977).