Court Opinion

ID: 5283856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 01:14:33.76114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:29.662480
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM
M.A.H.S. (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying a custody decree awarding M.J.H. (“Father”) sole physical and legal custody of the couple’s son, A.H., age 11 at the time of the judgment, and restricting Mother’s visitation with A.H. to four consecutive hours of supervised visitation every other weekend.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).