Court Opinion

ID: 5404865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 15:58:52.59491+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:33.093486
License: Public Domain

Giegerich, J.
The record shows that the defendant did not deny any of the allegations of the complaint, but set up affirmative defenses. Hence, when the case was called for trial, nothing remained for the plaintiff to prove. It is to be conceded that defendant’s admissions upon the trial did not affect the right to the affirmative, but under the state of the pleadings, as disclosed by the return, the affirmative was with the defendant. Under the circumstances, it was reversible error for the trial justice to refuse, as he did, the latter’s request made at the opening of the trial, to *526open and close the case. Conselyea v. Swift, 103 N. Y. 604; Trenkmann v. Schneider, 23 Misc. Rep. 336, and citations.
The judgment must, therefore, he reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Beekman, P. J., and Gildersleeve, J., concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.