Court Opinion

ID: 591563
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.292476
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 726
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Daniel G. KENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD;  Clarence L. Jackson, Chairman;Lewis W. Hurst, Vice Chairman;  Gail Y. Browne,Member;  Jacqueline F. Fraser, Member;John A. Brown, Member,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6241.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 1, 1992Decided:  Sept. 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-91-588-R)
Daniel G. Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Daniel G. Kendrick appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Kendrick v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-91-588-R (W.D. Va.  Feb. 21, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED