Court Opinion

ID: 588359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:45.066487
License: Public Domain

972 F.2d 341
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Eloise RASNICK, attorney in fact for Bernard Rasnick, Petitioner,v.BISHOP COAL COMPANY;  Director, Office of Workers'Compensation Programs, United States Department ofLabor, Respondents.
No. 91-1251.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  April 20, 1992Decided:  August 14, 1992

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
Bernard Rasnick, Petitioner Pro Se.
Ann Brannon Rembrandt, JACKSON & KELLY;  Deborah Elaine Mayer, Barbara J.  Johnson, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, for Respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Bernard Rasnick seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1991).  Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.  Rasnick v. Bishop Coal Co., No. 88-3977-BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 3, 1991;  Dec. 21, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED