Court Opinion

ID: 9942201
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-20 18:02:55.964647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:50.224575
License: Public Domain

Filed 2/20/24 P. v. S.E. CA2/5
   NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                        DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE                                                   B330149

         Plaintiff and Respondent,                           (Los Angeles County
                                                             Super. Ct. No.
         v.                                                  SJ0011A)

S.E.,

         Defendant and Appellant.

     APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los
Angeles County, Susan Ser, Judge. Affirmed.
     Sarah M. Javaheri, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance by Respondent.
      After a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court
sustained a wardship petition against then-minor S.E. pursuant
to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a). In
an order dated May 17, 2023, the court found true beyond a
reasonable doubt the allegation that S.E. committed
misdemeanor assault by means of force likely to produce great
bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4).) The court placed
S.E. home on probation and ordered certain terms and conditions
of probation.
      S.E. timely appealed the findings and order of the court.
We appointed counsel. After reviewing the record, counsel filed
an opening brief asking this court to review the record
independently pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,
441 (Wende). On January 10, 2024, we advised S.E. that she had
30 days to submit any contentions or issues she wished us to
consider. No response has been received to date.
      We have examined the entire record. We are satisfied no
arguable issues exist and that S.E.’s counsel has fully satisfied
her responsibilities under Wende. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528
U.S. 259, 279–284; Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

                                2
                        DISPOSITION
     The juvenile court’s May 17, 2023 order is affirmed.
     NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                         MOOR, J.

WE CONCUR:

           BAKER, Acting P. J.

           LEE, J.

     Judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court, assigned by
the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the
California Constitution.

                               3