Court Opinion

ID: 8028051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:52:45.174401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:52.888567
License: Public Domain

On February 6,1992, the Defendant was sentenced to forty (40) years for Mitigated Deliberate Homicide and it is the recommendation of the Court to the Parole Board that prior to eligibility for parole the Defendant shall complete the chemical dependence program, all social skills and vocational training at the Women’s Correctional Facility. Credit is given for 252 days time served.
On March 11, 1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Patricia Day-Moore, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
Hon. Thomas McKittrick, Chairman, Hon. John Warner, and Hon. James Purcell, Judges
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Patricia Day-Moore, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the defendant and to this Court.