Court Opinion

ID: 5412125
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:10:52.904024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:51.097400
License: Public Domain

Wheeler, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant upon a certain promissory note made and executed by it. The defendant answered. In its answer the defendant denies none of the allegations of the complaint, but sets up by way of counterclaim a cause of action growing out of an alleged breach of contract by the plaintiff to deliver at a specified point a certain quantity of cooperage stock.
*385The answer was served within time, but was not accompanied by an order directing the issues to be tried as provided by section 1778 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the plaintiff’s attorney entered judgment against the defendant “ as in case of default."
Motion is now made to set aside the judgment so entered. We think the motion should be granted, for the reason that no order directing the issues to be tried was necessary in this case. No issue has in fact been made by the answer in this case. The making and liability on the note are admitted; but, by way of offset, the defendant sets up an alleged counterclaim. No proper issue can be said to be joined until the plaintiff replies to the counterclaim. It was the manifest purpose and intent of the section in question that, when an answer is interposed to a note made by a corporation in which the note itself is involved and defended, a judge shall look into the issues tendered sufficiently to determine whether the issue has sufficient merit to entitle it to be tried. No such question is presented in this case.
We, therefore, are of the opinion that the judgment was improperly entered, and must be vacated.
Judgment vacated, without costs.