Court Opinion

ID: 8276817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 02:35:07.394881+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:38.952672
License: Public Domain

DAYTON, J.
The evidence is clear that “David M. Oltarsh Iron Works, Incorporated,” employed the driver of the truck, and that the name of “David M. Oltarsh Iron Works, Incorporated,” was painted on the truck, and that at the place of business where the plaintiff called before bringing this suit was a large sign “David Oltarsh Iron Works, Incorporated.” The fact that a corporation by that name existed appeared by uncontradicted oral testimony without objection. The claimed admission of defendant that he owned the truck and employed the driver is a forced construction of language, which could not have misled plaintiff, when by inquiry he might have readily ascertained that Mr. Oltarsh was referring to his company.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.