Court Opinion

ID: 996883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:57:20.86325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:28.319176
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARCUS DUKE SHELTON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-90-208-R, CA-97-287-R)

Submitted:   October 20, 1998          Decided:     November 19, 1998

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Duke Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Shelton, Nos. CR-90-208-R; CA-97-287-R

(W.D. Va. July 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2