Court Opinion

ID: 2538781
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:15:24.736305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:27.676610
License: Public Domain

353 S.W.3d 450 (2011)
Johnny L. McKINNEY, Sr., Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96279.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
November 29, 2011.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Johnny L. McKinney, Sr., appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the *451 motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).