Court Opinion

ID: 3518553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:30:10.704089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:05:49.473517
License: Public Domain

As disclosed by the subjoined opinions, one of the judges is for an affirmance, while five are agreed that the decree should be reversed. But, two of the latter think that a decree for appellant should be entered here; while the other three are of the opinion that the case should be remanded for a further hearing. In such a situation none of the subjoined opinions are to be regarded as the opinion of the court further than as being sufficient to work a reversal and remand, under the authority of McNutt v. Lancaster, 9 Smedes  M. 570, 592.
Reversed and remanded.