Court Opinion

ID: 4365065
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-06 17:02:31.014691+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:03.573385
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                              OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                   Filed: January 9, 2019
* * * * * * * *               *   *   *   **
VICTORIA PUSATERI,                         *              UNPUBLISHED
                                           *
              Petitioner,                  *              No. 16-467V
                                           *
v.                                         *              Special Master Gowen
                                           *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *              Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
                                           *              Interim; Denial.
              Respondent.                  *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Scott William Rooney, Nemes, Rooney P.C., Farmington Hills, MI, for petitioner
Robert Paul Coleman, III, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

               DECISION ON INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

       On December 11, 2018, petitioner filed a third motion for interim attorneys’ fees and costs.
Motion for Interim Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Petitioner’s Motion”), ECF No. 87. Petitioner
previously was awarded $17,725.00 in interim costs on February 13, 2018. See Decision on
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, ECF No. 65. I denied petitioner’s second motion for interim attorneys’
fees and costs on September 24, 2018, because the request did not meet the minimum filing
requirements as stated in the Initial Order. See Decision of Special Master Denying Motion for
Interim Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, ECF No. 79.

        As a policy, I do not encourage motions for interim fees and costs, because they are often
made prematurely and divert judicial resources away from resolving the entitlement issues central
to all Program cases. I do understand the need for interim fees and costs in some situations,
particularly where the fees and costs incurred are particularly high or where the case is expected
to be particularly protracted. As stated in the Initial Order and in my previous Decision denying
petitioner’s interim fees and costs request, I do not typically award interim fees and costs when
the amount of fees requested is less than $30,000.00, or when the requested costs are less than
$15,000.00. Initial Order at 4, ECF No. 12.

       In her instant Motion, petitioner requested $22,980.00 as reimbursement for interim
attorneys’ fees and $10,181.30 as reimbursement for interim costs. Petitioner’s Motion at ¶ 15.

       As petitioner was awarded interim fees and costs within the past twelve months and the
amounts she requested for reimbursement in her instant motion do not meet or exceed the
benchmark provided in the Initial Order, petitioner’s motion is DENIED as premature. Petitioner
may request the fees and costs included in her motion at the conclusion of the case or if and when
the amounts requested meet or exceed the benchmark amounts.

                                                1
         Further, upon reviewing the instant motion, I noted that petitioner’s counsel is requesting
$350.00 per hour for all work performed on this case in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Mr. Rooney has
previously been awarded $300.00 per hour for work performed in 2016 and 2017. Mr. Rooney
recently was awarded an hourly rate of $350.00 per hour for work performed in 2018 in Thomas
v. Sec’y of Health & Human Services, No. 14-996V, 2018 WL 5725184 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Oct.
5, 2018). In that decision, Special Master Moran did not find it reasonable to retroactively increase
Mr. Rooney’s hourly rate for work performed prior to 2018. Id. at *2. In accord with Special
Master Moran in Thomas, I will not retroactively increase Mr. Rooney’s reasonable hourly rate for
the work he performed on this case in 2016 and 2017 in future motions for fees and costs. As
such, in future motions for fees and costs, petitioner’s counsel should submit billing logs that
reflect the $300 hourly rate for those years.

        Any questions about this Order or other aspects of the case may be directed to my law
clerk, Kathryn Le, at (202) 357-6361 or kathryn le@cfc.uscourts.gov.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.
                                                              s/Thomas L. Gowen
                                                              Thomas L. Gowen
                                                              Special Master

                                                 2