Court Opinion

ID: 2945742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 03:55:00.371955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:00.684887
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,927

EX PARTE ERIC DEMOND DOUGLAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1122749 IN THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

	Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of
cocaine as a habitual felony offender and was sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment.  The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Douglas v. State, No. 14-08-01177-CR (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] del. Jan. 29, 2009).  
	Applicant contends he was denied his right to a direct appeal, and the trial court finds the
reason the appellate court lacked jurisdiction was because appellate counsel was not timely
appointed even though Applicant timely expressed his desire to appeal. Where there has been a
breakdown in the system, this Court has held due process requires that an applicant be permitted to
exercise his statutory right to the appellate proceeding. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900

(Tex.Crim.App. 2006); see also Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). 
	Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of
conviction in Cause No. 1122749 from the 174th District Court of Harris County. Applicant is
ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then,
with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion,
the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to
be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent
Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed
on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to
prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court
within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed
without prejudice.
	Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 
Delivered: December 5, 2012
Do not publish