Court Opinion

ID: 1003584
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:28:45.286783+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:21.214042
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7715

JOHN T. SCOTT,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DOCTOR SWANN,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-711-5-BO)

Submitted:   February 8, 2001          Decided:     February 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John T. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     John T. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   Scott v. Swann, No. CA-00-711-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov.

13, 2000).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2