Court Opinion

ID: 4597350
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-20 19:19:00.076147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:51:46.924517
License: Public Domain

Ida B. Lewis v. Commissioner. George W. Lewis v. Commissioner. George W. Lewis and Ida B. Lewis v. Commissioner.Lewis v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 51599-51601.United States Tax CourtT.C. Memo 1958-23; 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207; 17 T.C.M. 103; T.C.M. (RIA) 58023; February 19, 1958Aaron S. Resnik, Esq., for the respondent.  LEMIRE Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion LEMIRE, Judge: These consolidated cases involve deficiencies and additions to the tax as follows: DocketAdditions to TaxYearNo.PetitionerDeficiencyunder Sec. 293(b)194651599Ida B. Lewis$ 60,369.07$31,351.19194751599Ida B. Lewis179,875.6589,937.83194251600George W. Lewis7,068.613,534.31194351600George W. Lewis957.89 *478.95194451600George W. Lewis20,674.2610,337.13194551600George W. Lewis35,615.4917,807.74194651600George W. Lewis62,517.1231,258.56194751600George W. Lewis180,309.8590,154.93194851601George W. Lewis and IdaB. Lewis179,140.5489,570.271958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*208 The petitioners are husband and wife and reside at San Anselmo, California. Petitioner, George W. Lewis, filed separate returns for the years 1942 to 1945, in the District of Maryland. For the years 1946 and 1947, petitioners filed separate returns on the community property basis. For the year 1948, a joint return was filed. The various returns of petitioners for the years 1946 to 1948, inclusive, were filed with the collector or district director at San Francisco, California. Petitioners executed a consent fixing the period of limitations to June 30, 1954, for each of the years 1945 to 1948, inclusive. The statutory notice in each docket number was issued on November 10, 1953. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. At the hearing the respondent conceded the absence of fraud with reference to petitioner, Ida B. Lewis, docket No. 51599, as to the years 1946 and 1947. Absent any evidence on the part of petitioners, the deficiencies determined by the Commissioner are approved for lack of prosecution and failure of proof. There remains for determination the question whether the deficiencies determined in docket Nos. 51600 and1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*209  51601, or any part thereof, were due to fraud with intent to evade tax under section 293(b) of the 1939 Code. The burden is upon the respondent to establish fraud by clear and convincing evidence. Section 1112, I.R.C. of 1939. The record shows that George W. Lewis, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, was engaged in some legitimate businesses and was considerably involved in gambling. Petitioners maintained no proper books and records and refused to make available to the examining revenue agents any records or receipts they may have possessed. After an investigation covering a period of approximately three years, during which time the agents interviewed about 50 witnesses, the tax liability of petitioners was determined on the net worth and expenditures method. The net income reported on the returns of petitioners and the net income as determined by the respondent is shown in the following schedule: Net IncomeShownAs DeterminedYearPetitioneron Returnsby Respondent1942George W. Lewis$ 15,066.35$ 28,269.641943George W. Lewis21,450.0023,118.591944George W. Lewis23,667.0353,317.721945George W. Lewis47,595.5591,069.071946George W. Lewis17,477.87105,411.721946Ida B. Lewis17,477.87105,411.721947George W. Lewis9,483.25239,640.151947Ida B. Lewis11,543.09239,640.151948George and Ida Lewis115,153.06348,034.861958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*210  A summary of the net worth statement reflecting the net worth increase and understatement of income is shown in the following schedule: SUMMARY NET WORTH STATEMENTREFLECTING NET WORTH INCREASE AND UNDERSTATEMENTOF INCOME OF PETITIONERSYears Ended12/31/4112/31/4212/31/4312/31/44Total Assets$ 50,926.87$ 79,007.66$ 95,168.15$ 166,740.88Total Liabilities750.0023,700.00Net Worth Increase28,830.7916,160.4947,872.73Understated Income13,232.221,668.5929,650.69SUMMARY NET WORTH STATEMENTREFLECTING NET WORTH INCREASE AND UNDERSTATEMENTOF INCOME OF PETITIONERSYears Ended12/31/4512/31/4612/31/4712/31/48Total Assets$232,757.25$411,095.86$868,502.26$1,199,769.88Total Liabilities9,400.00Net Worth Increase80,316.37187,738.61457,406.40331,267.62Understated Income43,473.52175,867.70458,253.97231,614.68The investigation by the revenue agents disclosed 4 principal sources which produced unreported income, to-wit: Personal gambling activities, bookmaking activities, manipulation of pari-mutuel funds, and income from1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*211  various legitimate enterprises, in which petitioner had an interest. The examination also disclosed that during the taxable years involved petitioner maintained two safety-deposit boxes in fictitious names. The record shows that petitioner in each of the years 1943 to 1948, inclusive, omitted certain specific items of income, as follows: 1943Partnership income - AlhambraBowling Alley$ 6,668.591944Partnership income - AlhambraBowling Alley1,333.681945, 1946 and1947Income from the Unusual Clean-ers & Dyers in each year inthe amount of600.001948Income from partnership inLaurel Pottery Mfg. Co.43,198.44On May 13, 1954, petitioner was found guilty of willfully and knowingly attempting to defeat and evade a large part of income tax for the years 1947 and 1948 in violation of section 145(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and was setenced to serve one year and to pay a fine of $24,000. Upon the entire record, we are convinced that the respondent has shown by clear and convincing evidence that a part, if not all the deficiencies determined against petitioner, George W. Lewis, for each of the taxable years 1942 to 1948, 1958 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 207">*212  inclusive, was due to fraud with intent to evade tax and we so hold. Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.  Footnotes*. Income and Victory tax.↩