Court Opinion

ID: 8452634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:11:05.353538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.072980
License: Public Domain

*893Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Douglas, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Douglas v. Maynard, No. 8:11-cv-00255-DKC, 2012 WL 440822 (D.Md. Feb. 9, Feb. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.