Court Opinion

ID: 4244555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-13 16:00:38.138569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:46.364583
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-13466   Date Filed: 02/13/2018   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 17-13466
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00253-CEM-TBS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

MICKELLE DEANGELO BULLOCK,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (February 13, 2018)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-13466    Date Filed: 02/13/2018   Page: 2 of 2

      Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for Mickelle Bullock in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bullock’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2