Court Opinion

ID: 7906679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 22:01:16.244877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:32:26.463365
License: Public Domain

Burch, J.
(concurring specially):. I concur in the result, for the following reasons: The lumber company sold the lumber for the building to its mortgagor. When the lumber company took its mortgage it was charged with notice of what the record revealed and suggested regarding the mortgagor’s land title. The record disclosed the mortgagor did not have title until long after he purchased the lumber and erected the building. This fact suggested some kind of arrangement under which the building was placed on the land. Inquiry would have revealed the building was a chattel when erected, and was covered by chattel mortgage when title was taken.