Court Opinion

ID: 994368
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:22:03.755206+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.796854
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MITCHELL LOCKLEAR,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-92-42, CA-97-146-5-H)

Submitted:   February 3, 1998             Decided:   March 12, 1998

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mitchell Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Locklear, Nos. CR-92-42; CA-97-146-5-H
(E.D.N.C. June 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2