Court Opinion

ID: 9831934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:29:24.484458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:39.602534
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
At the next preceding term of this court, the judgment in this ease was reversed, and the cause remanded for errors in the charge, as pointed out in the ninth and tenth assignments of error. All of the other assignments of error were overruled.
Upon motion for rehearing, we certified to the Supreme Court the questions presented by those assignments. Having some doubt *1184also as to the correctness of our conclusion in holding that the trial court did not err in submitting the issue of assumed risk, it being insisted by appellant that under the undisputed evidence, particularly the testimony of appellee, he assumed the risk of danger of the accident by which he suffered the injury complained of,- this question was also certified. In an opinion announced by the Supreme Court November 6, 1912, it was held by the Supreme Court that the trial court did not err in those portions of the charge complained of by the ninth and tenth assignments of error, and further that there was no error in submitting the issue of assumed risk. It is not necessary that we do more than refer to the opinion of the Supreme Court, from which, in connection with our original opinion (delivered January 30, 1911). it follows that there is no error in the record authorizing reversal of the judgment of the trial court.
The motion for rehearing is granted, the former judgment of reversal set aside, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.