Court Opinion

ID: 2876149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 06:42:58.635873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:31.477604
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00260-CV

Troy Rose, Appellant

v.

City of Brady, Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCCULLOCH COUNTY, 198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 2008143, HONORABLE EMIL KARL PROHL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

		The appellant's brief was due on July 9, 2009.  On July 21, 2009, this Court notified
appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a proper motion for extension of time
by July 31, 2009, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution.  To date, the
appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. (1)  Accordingly, we dismiss this
appeal for want of prosecution.		
___________________________________________					          Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed:   August 26, 2009
1.   On May 11, 2009, the appellant filed a motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal. 
Because the filing fee has not been paid and no certificate of conference has been filed, see Tex. R.
App. P. 10.1(a)(5), the motion remains pending and is hereby dismissed as moot.