Court Opinion

ID: 9832620
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:03:38.279939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:49.615178
License: Public Domain

On Second Motion for Rehearing.
We desire to say that in our original opinion we cite the case of Cathey v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co., 104 Tex. 41, 133 S. W. 417, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 103, and use a quotation therefrom which is apparently not used in said report. However, the confusion was brought about by improper punctuation, and on account of the fact that the opinion does not show where the quotation ended, and where the language of counsel began. Therefore the said case will be omitted from the opinion in this case. However, the views expressed in the remainder of the opinion have not been altered, and in our judgment must be adhered to.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.