Court Opinion

ID: 4995110
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-28 11:14:38.182653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:16:49.612795
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                     San Antonio, Texas
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-21-00057-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LYN M. WOLFF AND JASON W. WOLFF

                     From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2019-CI-22278
                            Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
                  Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 22, 2021

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

           Appellant Lyn M. Wolff seeks to appeal the trial court’s final divorce decree signed on

November 6, 2020. A notice of appeal was due to be filed on December 7, 2020, within thirty

days after the judgment was signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline for filing a notice of

appeal may be extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).

Appellant filed a motion for new trial on December 10, 2020, more than thirty days after the

judgment was signed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a) (a motion for new trial must be filed within

thirty days after the judgment). Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial,

appellant’s notice of appeal was due no later than December 7, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on February 22, 2021. We therefore issued an order
                                                                                        04-21-00057-CV

instructing appellant to respond in writing stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack

of jurisdiction.

        Appellant responded by stating that her motion for new trial was timely e-filed on

December 4, 2020, but the file size was too large and the filing was rejected. The motion for new

trial was resubmitted and successfully e-filed on December 10, 2020. Appellant requests that we

deem the motion for new trial as timely filed on December 4, 2020 and similarly deem her notice

of appeal as timely filed. In the alternative, appellant requests that we grant an extension of time

to file the notice of appeal.

        Assuming that appellant’s motion for new trial was timely filed on December 4, 2020, her

notice of appeal would have been due on February 4, 2021. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). As noted,

appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on February 22, 2021. Rule 26.3 authorizes an appellate

court to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the appellant files both the notice of appeal and

a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline for

filing the notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. A motion for extension of time is necessarily

implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed

by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. See Verburgt v.

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But, “once the

period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no

longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Id. Here, appellant’s notice of appeal was not

filed within the fifteen-day grace period. See id. Appellant has failed to establish that this court

has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a).

                                                    PER CURIAM

                                                  -2-