Court Opinion

ID: 4115926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-16 08:22:04.841089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:46:15.661641
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-85,920-01

                    EX PARTE JERREL ANTHONY MARTIN, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 1443272-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest

and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. His appeal was dismissed. Martin v. State, No. 01-15-

00015-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 10, 2015) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because, among other

things, counsel mis-advised him about the potential punishment range.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). Applicant’s
                                                                                                      2

attorneys filed responses to his claims, but in these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to provide a

supplemental response to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel specifying the factual

basis for advice that Applicant could face imprisonment for between twenty-five and ninety-nine

years or life in this case. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

Applicant could have faced the habitual offender punishment range in this case. TEX . PENAL CODE

§ 12.42(d) (West 2014). Should the court determine that counsel erred, it shall make specific

findings determining whether counsel’s deficient performance caused Applicant’s decision to plead

guilty to be involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions

of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas

corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
                                                                         3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 11, 2017
Do not publish