Court Opinion

ID: 9892109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-20 16:08:13.295408+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.713288
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

                                      No. 94A22

                                Filed 20 October 2023

HOLLIS L. BATSON and CAROL D. BATSON; LAWRENCE F. BALDWIN and
ELIZABETH C. BALDWIN; BALDWIN-BATSON OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC.

             v.
COASTAL  RESOURCES    COMMISSION                      and   NORTH       CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

      Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of

the Court of Appeals, 282 N.C. App. 1 (2022), vacating an order entered on 23

September 2020 by Judge Charles H. Henry in Superior Court, Carteret County, and

remanding the case. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 September 2023.

      I. Clark Wright Jr. for petitioner-appellees.

      Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Mary L. Lucasse, Special Deputy
      Attorney General, for respondent-appellant Coastal Resources Commission.

      No brief for respondent-appellee North Carolina Department of Transportation.

      PER CURIAM.

      Justice DIETZ did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting

to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands

without precedential value. See City of Charlotte v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC, 373 N.C.

325 (2020) (per curiam) (affirming by an equally divided vote a Court of Appeals
                          BATSON V. COASTAL RES. COMM’N

                                 Opinion of the Court

decision without precedential value).

      AFFIRMED.

                                         -2-