Court Opinion

ID: 2803805
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-27 19:12:19.642037+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:51:47.792065
License: Public Domain

People v Pinchupa (2015 NY Slip Op 04514)

People v Pinchupa

2015 NY Slip Op 04514

Decided on May 27, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 27, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2013-05919
 (Ind. No. 2468/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vPaul H. Pinchupa, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Modica, J.), imposed May 7, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., BALKIN, CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court