Court Opinion

ID: 8437221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:00:23.144275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:44.508435
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Edward Martin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in part to defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Lott, No. 3:07-cv-03782-JFA, 2010 WL 547175 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.