Court Opinion

ID: 3107425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:13:17.610948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:25.123365
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00662-CV

                                    COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                           CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

               IN THE INTEREST OF S.M., A CHILD
____________________________________________________________

          On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        Appellant, S.F.1, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at

Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 09-60992-5. Appellant has filed

an amended unopposed motion to withdraw the appeal without prejudice.

        The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed

motion to withdraw the appeal without prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should

        1
          In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure
require the use of an alias to refer to a minor, Aand if necessary to protect the minor=s identity, to the minor=s
parent or other family member.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8.
be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s amended motion to withdraw the

appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                         PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
10th day of March, 2011.

                                            2