Court Opinion

ID: 4949799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 12:52:31.265911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:00:12.396324
License: Public Domain

[1] ORDER
[2] This case came before a panel of the Supreme Court on February 15, 1994, pursuant to an order directing the plaintiff to appear and to show cause why her appeal should not be summarily decided.
[3] The plaintiff appeals the denial in Superior Court of her motion for a new trial and/or additur on the issue of damages in a motor vehicle accident involving the parties.
[4] After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown.
[5] After trial, the jury returned a verdict in plaintiff's favor and awarded damages in the amount of $2,260, which plaintiff alleges inadequate.
[6] This court affords great weight to a trial justice's ruling on a motion for a new trial, and such a ruling will not be disturbed unless the trial justice has misconstrued or overlooked material evidence or was otherwise clearly wrong. Connors v.Gasbarro, 448 A.2d 756, 759 (R.I. 1982). Our review of the evidence supports the decision of the trial justice. The jury's verdict was not clearly wrong, and the trial justice was within his discretion to uphold their decision.
[7] Consequently, we deny and dismiss the appeal, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
[8] WEISBERGER, Acting C.J., did not participate. *Page 1056