Court Opinion

ID: 1002283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:08:48.723001+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:41:16.522383
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6285

CLINTON BRINSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CR-96-197, CA-99-823-5-F)

Submitted:   July 25, 2000                 Decided:   August 25, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Brinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Clinton Brinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny Brinson’s

motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appeal-

ability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Brinson v. United States, Nos. CR-96-197; CA-99-823-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2