Court Opinion

ID: 746628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 22:34:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:32.154160
License: Public Domain

125 F.3d 860
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Man Chu YI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-10322.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 1997.*Decided Sept. 24, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam, No. CR-95-00176-JSU.   John S. Unpingco, District Judge, Presiding.
Before:  HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Man Chu Yi appeals his conviction following a jury trial and his sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) (reentry of a deported alien convicted of a felony).  Yi's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which this court construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel.  Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

3
AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3