Court Opinion

ID: 9889788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-11 17:01:47.523988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.164631
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12666     Document: 15-1      Date Filed: 10/11/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                     In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eleventh Circuit

                           ____________________

                                  No. 23-12666
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                           ____________________

       EDWIN TERRY WINFORD,
                                                       Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       JJTA REAL PROPERTIES LLC,
       as manager for people choice apts,
       PEOPLE CHOICE APTS,
       SHARI BOYD,
       Manager,
       CAITLIN COUGHLIN,
       Junior Digital Marketing Specialist,
       DLP REAL ESTATE,
USCA11 Case: 23-12666     Document: 15-1      Date Filed: 10/11/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                23-12666

                                                     Defendants-Appellees.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                    D.C. Docket No. 3:23-cv-00100-BJD-JBT
                           ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. It is unclear what Edwin Winford, pro se, seeks to challenge
       in his notice of appeal. In any event, the only order the district
       court has entered in this case is an order striking a case manage-
       ment report. Because this is not a final or appealable order, we lack
       jurisdiction to hear the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp.,
       Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.