Court Opinion

ID: 9370324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-13 07:08:09.225755+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.097140
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                            FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                          ORDER

Appellate case name:           In re Richard A. Dunsmore
Appellate case numbers:        01-22-00943-CR and 01-22-00944-CR
Trial court case numbers:      56909 and 56910
Trial court:                   412th District Court of Brazoria County
       Richard A. Dunsmore, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ
of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motions to
recuse the Honorable Lamar McCorkle, Visiting Judge of the 412th District Court of
Brazoria County, in trial court criminal case numbers 56909 and 56910. On January 10,
2023, the Court issued an opinion denying Dunsmore’s request for mandamus relief.
       On January 30, 2023, Dunsmore filed a “request to stay” or for the “abatement of
the advancement of the memorandum opinion” issued on January 10, 2023. In his motion,
Dunsmore requests that the Court “stay” or “abate” the “issuance of the mandate in this
case until the request to the administrative judge in Houston, Texas is answered as to
getting permission to get an instrument to remove Senior Judge McCorkle from Brazoria
County cases . . . 56909 [and] 56910.”
       In original proceedings filed under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, the Court
does not issue a judgment or mandate after taking action on the petition. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8 (titled “Action on Petition”). Accordingly, this Court is unable to take any action
requested by Dunsmore’s motion.
       Dunsmore’s motion for “stay” or “abatement” is therefore denied.
       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ April Farris_________
                    Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 9, 2023_____