Court Opinion

ID: 899073
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-09 02:11:28.425237+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:52.476641
License: Public Domain

Filed 9/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 178

State of North Dakota, 		Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Grady Jackson, 		Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110063

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kelly A. Dillon, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Jackson

No. 20110063

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	Grady Jackson appeals from a district court judgment after a jury convicted him of driving while license suspended, a class A misdemeanor.  Jackson argues the district court wrongly denied him the services of an attorney.  We conclude the district court did not deny Jackson his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  
See
 
State v. Falos
, 431 N.W.2d 154 (N.D. 1988).  Jackson also argues that the district court should have provided him an evidentiary hearing on his motion to suppress and that the district court imposed upon him an excessive sentence because it relied on impermissible factors in determining his sentence.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner