Court Opinion

ID: 4028233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-24 23:54:22.508982+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:07.751220
License: Public Domain

*465
   

   ORDER
  

  PER CURIAM.
 

  AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
 

  In a civil trial brought on behalf of a pedestrian who was killed by a motorist, is it reversible error where the defendant motorist admits evidence of the pedestrian’s uncorroborated post-mortem blood alcohol content (BAC) by way of a toxicology expert who merely explains the uncorroborated BAC in terms of how an equivalent BAC would render an “average” person unfit to cross the street?