Court Opinion

ID: 990086
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:16:07.788641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:43.357242
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6628

JOHN PATTON MCGLOTHLIN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SERGEANT RICHIE; OFFICER MARSHALL; OFFICER
BLANTON; OFFICER LEUSEUR; LARRY HUFFMAN; LISA
EDWARDS; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge. (CA-95-1290-R)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Patton McGlothlin, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,
Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McGlothlin v. Richie, No. CA-95-1290-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 12,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2