Court Opinion

ID: 4240327
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-30 17:11:54.247869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:36:46.101628
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  January 16, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0986. CURTIS L. SWINTON v. THE STATE.

      In 2012, Curtis L. Swinton was convicted of robbery by force, aggravated
assault, and kidnapping with bodily injury. He was sentenced to life imprisonment
plus twenty years. We affirmed his convictions on appeal in an unpublished opinion.
See Swinton v State, Case No. A15A0727 (decided June 29, 2015). In May 2017,
Swinton filed a “motion for modification for void conviction and sentence,” arguing
that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for kidnapping, the
indictment was void and defective, and his sentence was “ambiguous.” The trial court
denied the motion, and Swinton then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack
jurisdiction.
      Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year
after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,
whichever is later. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247)
(2010). Once this statutory period expires, a direct appeal may lie from an order
denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence only if the defendant raises
a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 286
Ga. 216, 217 (1) n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119
(676 SE2d 465) (2009). When a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment,
it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      Here, Swinton does not contend that his sentence exceeds the most severe
punishment allowed. Rather, he argues that his conviction for kidnapping is void
under Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696 (670 SE2d 73) (2008), which redefined the
asportation element of kidnapping. He also asserts that the trial court’s failure to
merge several of his convictions that arise out of the same criminal conduct violates
the prohibition against double jeopardy. However, these are challenges to his
convictions rather than his sentence. The Supreme Court has made clear that a motion
seeking to challenge an allegedly invalid or void judgment of conviction “is not one
of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal
case” and that an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal.
Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Thus, Swinton is not authorized
to collaterally attack his convictions in this manner.
      To the extent Swinton’s claim concerning the sufficiency of his indictment
could be construed as a motion in arrest of judgment, the motion is untimely because
it was not filed during the term of court at which the judgment was obtained. See
OCGA § 17-9-61 (b); Hammond v. State, 292 Ga. 237, 238 (734 SE2d 396) (2012).
      For the foregoing reasons, Swinton’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         01/16/2018
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                               Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                        , Clerk.