Court Opinion

ID: 871725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-25 02:20:59.724154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:37.364841
License: Public Domain

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JAMES SCOTT GOMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 29809.
Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.
February 25, 2010.
On the briefs:
Walter J. Rodby, for Defendant-Appellant.
Loren J. Thomas, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
NAKAMURA, C.J., FUJISE and LEONARD, JJ.
Defendant-Appellant James Scott Gomes (Gomes) appeals the judgment entered on April 28, 2009, in the District Court of the First Circuit, Kane'ohe Division (district court).[1]
Gomes was convicted of Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII), in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes § 291E-61(a) (Supp. 2009).
On appeal, Gomes contends the written complaint and oral charge were insufficient because they failed to state an essential element of the charge, i.e., that Gomes operated or assumed actual physical control of a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve Gomes's point of error as follows:
Prior to trial, Gomes moved to dismiss the charge because it failed to allege all the essential elements of the OVUII offense. The district court denied Gomes's motion. "[T]he operation of a vehicle on a public way, street, road, or highway is an attendant circumstance of the offense of OUVII, and is therefore an element of the offense." State v. Wheeler, 121 Hawai'i 383, 393, 219 P.3d 1170, 1180 (2009). The failure to allege that Gomes was driving a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway at the time of the offense rendered the charge deficient. Id.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 28, 2009 judgment of the District Court of the First Circuit, Kane'ohe Division is vacated and the matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the charge without prejudice.
NOTES
[1]  Per diem District Court Judge Philip Doi presided.