Court Opinion

ID: 9842849
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 02:19:46.412459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.638055
License: Public Domain

FAHY, Circuit Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I agree that as amended the complaint is sufficient to state a cause of action and I accordingly concur in reversal of the order dismissing the amended complaint. I would go no further since the order of the District Court granting to appellee leave to amend is not before us for review.
The authorities cited by the Court on this aspect of the case do not seem to me to be very helpful. Each refers to the power of a court of first instance to alter its interlocutory order when it has not entered a final judgment. Here, in contrast, a final judgment dismissing the complaint had been entered by the District Court and it is the only judgment before us on the appeal. Furthermore, appellant never expressed to this Court any desire to secure from the District Court the incidental relief now suggested.