Court Opinion

ID: 5675958
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 14:40:30.355443+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:46.039558
License: Public Domain

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated August 11, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
*456Because the prior determination upon which the order appealed from was predicated did not indicate an intention to dismiss on the merits, the order cannot be deemed a basis for the application of the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been denied. Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.