Court Opinion

ID: 9895245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-06 16:01:46.247335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:48.941299
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1355
                        ___________________________

                                Shawn Flowers-Bey

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

  Robert Webster; Tomas Cabrera; Miguel Paniagua; Bonnie Brennen; Tamara
  Anderson; Mary Chandler; Dr. Karen Rhodes; Dr. Unknown McCollum; Dr.
Unknown Kim; Tamra Crouch; Chantay Godert; Danial Redington; Dr. Unknown Lovelace

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Missouri - Hannibal
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: October 30, 2023
                            Filed: November 6, 2023
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Shawn Flowers-Bey appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of some
claims, and adverse grant of summary judgment on the remaining claims, in his pro
se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, we find that dismissal of some
claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 was appropriate, for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Kaden v. Slykhuis, 651 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam)
(standard of review). We also find that summary judgment was properly granted for
defendants on the other claims. See Hancock v. Arnott, 39 F.4th 482, 486 (8th Cir.
2022) (standard of review; deliberate indifference requires inmate to show that he
suffered from objectively serious medical need, and that defendants had actual
knowledge of that need but deliberately disregarded it); Dulany v. Carnahan, 132
F.3d 1234, 1240 (8th Cir. 1997) (in face of physician affidavit indicating care
provided was adequate, inmate cannot create question of fact by stating he felt
treatment was inadequate). We do not address the claims Flowers-Bey has waived
on appeal. See Hess v. Ables, 714 F.3d 1048, 1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (waiver of
claims).

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

                                         -2-