Court Opinion

ID: 7943605
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:17:45.223025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:49.122134
License: Public Domain

Grant, J.
(after stating the facts). No such practice is known to the courts of this State. When defendants in a chancery suit have answered, and in their answer have inserted the usual demurrer clause, and replications have been filed, the case must go to a hearing upon the issues joined and a final decree rendered. It is neither proper nor good practice to permit parties to then take advantage of a demurrer and bring the case into this court by piecemeal. The result would be two trials, and possibly two appeals to this court to determine the issues, and great delay. We cannot sanction such a practice, even at the request of the parties litigant.
Without determining the questions raised, the order of the court will be set aside, and the case remanded for hearing upon proofs, should the parties desire to introduce any. No costs will be allowed.
McAlvay, Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred.