Court Opinion

ID: 5245387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 17:57:29.17438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:51.580568
License: Public Domain

Davis, J.:
Among other matters the order for examination provides “that John J. Wise, the managing agent of the said defendant company be examined as the adverse party herein * * * and submit to an examination concerning the matters relevant to the issue in this action.” The order then goes on to provide that he produce all the books, etc., of the defendant corporation. This order is improper in form in the following respects: It does not provide in terms for an examination of the corporation as an adverse party. The alleged managing agent is designated as the adverse party to be examined and he is not a party to the action, adverse or otherwise. Then again the order is too broad in that it provides for the examination of the witness “ concerning the matters relevant to the issue in this action.” The issues in the action are not only the issue raised by defendant’s denial of plaintiff’s allegations in his complaint, but also the issues raised by defendant’s affirmative defenses of ultra vires and lack of consideration for the note sued upon. An order giving the plaintiff a right to examine an adverse party as to its defenses cannot be sustained. And finally the affidavits upon which the order for examination was granted are clearly insufficient to warrant the making of the order. The absence therefrom of material allegations is so apparent that it is unnecessary to point them out in detail.
The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for examination granted, with ten dollars costs.
Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.