Court Opinion

ID: 5129518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-11-25 00:03:10.259238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:12.365124
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                            Electronically Filed
                                            Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                            CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                            24-NOV-2021
                                            07:58 AM
                                            Dkt. 18 ODSLJ
                        NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

               IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                      OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

                  IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF LI

        APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                       (FC-A NO. 21-1-6112)

    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
   (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)
           Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack
jurisdiction over the appeal by Aunt-Intervenor-Appellant (Aunt)
from the Family Court of the First Circuit's (family court)
September 10, 2021 Findings and Order Setting Further Hearing
(Order), because the family court has not entered a final,
appealable order or judgment, and the Order is not independently
appealable.
          In general, appeals in family court cases, as in other
civil cases, may be taken only from (1) a final judgment, order,
or decree, see Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 571–54 (2018),
641–1(a) (2016), or (2) a certified interlocutory order. See HRS
§ 641–1(b) (2016). The very nature of a family court chapter 587
proceeding entails "an on-going case which does not result in a
'final' order, as that term is generally defined[,]" In re Doe,
77 Hawai#i 109, 114, 883 P.2d 30, 35 (1994) (citation omitted),
because, under HRS chapter 587, the family court retains
continuing jurisdiction over the case to prevent future harm or
threatened harm to a child. Thus, in such family court cases,
the court considers whether the particular order appealed from
  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

contains a sufficient "degree of finality" to establish appellate
jurisdiction. Id. at 115, 883 P.2d at 36. A "final order" means
an order ending the proceeding, leaving nothing further to be
accomplished. Familian Nw., Inc. v. Cent. Pac. Boiler & Piping,
Ltd., 68 Haw. 368, 370, 714 P.2d 936, 937 (1986).
          Here, it appears that the Order does not contain a
sufficient degree of finality to establish appellate jurisdiction
because although it finds that it is in LI's best interest to be
adopted by Resource Caregiver-Petitioner-Appellee (RCG) and
schedules an adoption hearing for September 29, 2021, it does not
finalize adoption of LI by RCG. Further, it appears that the
Order is not appealable under the collateral-order doctrine
because it does not fully resolve a matter completely separate
from the main issue, and Aunt may appeal from the Order once the
family court enters a final, appealable order or judgment
granting a petition for adoption by RCG. See Greer v. Baker, 137
Hawai#i 249, 254, 369 P.3d 832, 837 (2016) (setting forth the
requirements for appealability under the collateral-order
doctrine).
           Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal in
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX is dismissed.
           IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
dismissed.
           DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 24, 2021.

                                      /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
                                      Presiding Judge

                                      /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
                                      Associate Judge

                                      /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                      Associate Judge

                                  2