Court Opinion

ID: 2924075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:55:37.359774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:59.378972
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-271-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN RE AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

 Relator, Aurora Loan Services, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and
motion for temporary relief in the above cause on April 30, 2007.  On May 1, 2007,
the Court granted the motion for temporary relief and stayed production under the trial
court's order of April 16, 2007 until twenty days after determination of this cause. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b) ("Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary
relief is effective until the case is finally decided.").  The Court requested that the real
party in interest, Doug Beard, file a response to relator's petition for writ of mandamus
on or before May 11, 2007.  Said response was duly filed.
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and response thereto is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself
entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, the stay is LIFTED and the petition for writ
of mandamus is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

 PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 16th day of May, 2007.
 

 
1.   See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).