Court Opinion

ID: 3077325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:26:20.33794+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:50.664283
License: Public Domain

In The

                              Court of Appeals
                   Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                          ____________________
                             NO. 09-12-00476-CR
                          ____________________

                 SARAH ELIZABETH WEEKLY, Appellant

                                      V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________        ______________

                   On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                          Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. 09-07377
________________________________________________________        _____________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Sarah Elizabeth Weekly pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to forgery.

The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, placed her on unadjudicated

community supervision for three years, and assessed a $500 fine. After the State

filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found Weekly violated a term of the

community supervision, adjudicated her guilt, and sentenced her to twenty months

in state jail.

                                       1
      Weekly’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error.

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967);

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an

extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response

from the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with

counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-

brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

      AFFIRMED.

                                               ________________________________
                                                        DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                             Justice

Submitted on March 21, 2013
Opinion Delivered April 3, 2013
Do Not Publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

                                           2