Court Opinion

ID: 9725561
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 11:52:51.737946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:16.634698
License: Public Domain

BOSLAUGH, J.,
dissenting.
The provision in the lease which preserved the lessor’s action for damages for breach of the lease in the event of termination was not unusual or illegal. See, 49 Am. Jur. 2d Landlord and Tenant § 1056 (1970); Central Trust Co. v. Wolf, 255 Mich. 8, 237 N.W. 29 (1931); Annot., 99 A.L.R. 42 (1935); Restatement (Second) of Property § 12.1, Comment g (1977). It was not ambiguous and the construction of the lease presented only a question of law.