Court Opinion

ID: 3124340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:51:45.24018+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:19:59.538635
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00624-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

MICHAEL MARLOW,                                                                Appellant,

                                            v.

JOSE SANCHEZ,                                       Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 214th District Court
                    of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 22, 2010. On April 30,

2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly

injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been

received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
24th day of June, 2010.

                                             2