Court Opinion

ID: 999202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:22:12.778951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:51.393348
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARIAM ZAMZAM,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CR-96-44-A, CA-98-617-7)

Submitted:   July 8, 1999                  Decided:    July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Shapiro, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Rick A.
Mountcastle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mariam Zamzam seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Zamzam, Nos. CR-96-44-A; CA-98-

617-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 27, 1999).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2