Court Opinion

ID: 989093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:02:00.978422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:39.510257
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7304

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JACK BLALOCK, SR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-90-394, CA-95-1662-3-6)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Blalock, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.     David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Blalock, Nos. CR-90-394; CA-95-1662-3-6 (D.S.C. July 27, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2