Court Opinion

ID: 1009751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:00:59.172995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:06.090158
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-7858

SIDNEY MABINE,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

             versus

LAWRENCE AMBROGI, Commonwealth’s        Attorney;
LUKE BOYD, Public Defender,

                                              Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-1061)

Submitted:    February 6, 2003            Decided:     February 13, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney Mabine, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Sidney Mabine appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Mabine v. Ambrogi, No. CA-

02-1061 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2002).   We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2