Court Opinion

ID: 9352773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-09 19:02:33.606275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:13.229608
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10396         Document: 00516602098             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/09/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10396
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 9, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Lysedh Armijo,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:21-CR-155-4
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Lysedh Armijo has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Armijo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10396     Document: 00516602098         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/09/2023

                                  No. 22-10396

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate re-
   view. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2