Court Opinion

ID: 3649356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:04:30.28189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:06.951114
License: Public Domain

The summons in this action was issued on 3 December, 1908, returnable to the February Term, 1909, of Sampson. On 14 December, 1908, plaintiff filed an affidavit, upon which he made a motion for a restraining order. J. S.Adams, J., holding a special term of Sampson for the trial of civil causes, issued a restraining order to defendants to *Page 241 
show cause before him on 21 December, 1908, at Clinton, in said county. Upon the return day the defendants resisted the continuance of the order, assigning, among other grounds, "That the order is irregular, because made returnable before his Honor, J. S. Adams, a judge holding a special term in Sampson County, in a case in which said judge has no jurisdiction to hear and determine, under the commission issued to him. No pleadings being filed, nor the summons, being yet returnable, there is no cause for trial, under his Honor's commission." His Honor continued the order, with permission to defendants to file bond, etc. Defendants excepted and appealed.
The statute (Rev. 814) provides that the judges of the Superior Court shall have jurisdiction to grant injunctions and issue restraining orders in all civil actions which are authorized by law, provided that a judge holding a special term in any county may grant an injunction or issue a restraining order, returnable before himself, in any case which he may have jurisdiction to hear and determine, under the commission issued to him, and the same shall be returnable as directed by the judge in the order. The only question presented, therefore, is whether Judge Adams had, by virtue of his commission to hold the special term of Sampson County, beginning 14 December, 1908, for the trial of civil cases, jurisdiction "to hear and determine" this case. Under the Code of Civil Procedure, defendant was not called upon to answer the complaint until the last day of the February Term, 1909. How, then, could Judge Adams "hear and determine" the   (295) case? The Legislature having thus limited his jurisdiction to make restraining orders returnable before himself in Sampson County, we have no power to extend the jurisdiction. He had the right to make the original order, but it should have been returnable before the resident judge of the district or the judge holding the courts of the district, either by assignment or exchange. Rev. 815; Hamilton v. Icard,112 N.C. 589. There was error in making the order returnable before himself. The order continuing the injunction will be reversed, without prejudice to the plaintiff to apply to the judge having jurisdiction for a restraining order, upon the affidavit filed, or a new one, as he may be advised. Of course, by consent, any judge may grant and continue restraining orders. There is
Error. *Page 242