Court Opinion

ID: 989503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:48.80468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:15.025874
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6136

MARK ANTHONY DENNIS,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

JAMES B. HUNT, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-95-466)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                  Decided:   June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis-

trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dennis v.
Hunt, No. CA-95-466 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2