Court Opinion

ID: 9380679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-20 22:00:28.405031+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:26.701096
License: Public Domain

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
                                       Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
                                              File Name: 23a0049p.06

                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                         FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

                                                                    ┐
 IN RE: DANNY HILL,                                                 │
                                                                     >         No. 20-3863
                                                    Petitioner.     │
                                                                    ┘

   On Petition for Leave to File a Second or Successive Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
         United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Youngstown.
                      No. 4:20-cv-01294—John R. Adams, District Judge.

                                    Decided and Filed: March 20, 2023

              Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN,
             KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN,
                       READLER, DAVIS, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.*
                                    _________________

                                                   COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Benjamin M. Flowers, Zachery P. Keller,
OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Respondent State of
Ohio. ON RESPONSE: Sharon A. Hicks, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER,
Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioner.
                                             _________________

                                                     ORDER
                                             _________________

       A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en
banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

       The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous
       opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on
       the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

       *
           Judge Murphy recused himself from participation in this decision.
 No. 20-3863                            In re Hill                                         Page 2

       Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are
vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

       The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for
oral argument as soon as possible.

                                              ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

                                              ___________________________________
                                              Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk