Court Opinion

ID: 6112841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-26 19:00:29.150626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:18.527229
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40413      Document: 00516180674         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/26/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                    January 26, 2022
                                  No. 21-40413                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                           Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Salvador Zirate-Urenda,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:19-CR-909-1

   Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador Zirate-
   Urenda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zirate-Urenda has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40413    Document: 00516180674          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/26/2022

                                  No. 21-40413

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2