Court Opinion

ID: 664377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:26:28+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:45.256127
License: Public Domain

17 F.3d 1433NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Iszard BALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,v.D. A. SMITH, Officer;  R. Brumback, Officer;  M. Ebersole,Officer.  Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-6633.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Feb. 7, 1994.Decided:  March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-90-1782-JFM)
Iszard Ballard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Ballard v. Smith, No. CA-90-1782-JFM (D. Md. May 3, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.