Court Opinion

ID: 1006581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:13:19.280868+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:38.229531
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTHONY EDWARD ZELLNER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CR-99-164, CA-01-311)

Submitted:   January 31, 2002             Decided:   February 6, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Edward Zellner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Anthony Edward Zellner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Zellner, Nos. CR-99-164;

CA-01-311 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2001).    We also deny Zellner’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motion to file a supple-

mental pro se formal brief and for a sentencing transcript.       We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2