Court Opinion

ID: 2785780
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-12 16:12:18.48825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:57.716261
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
                            SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

                                                                                      FILED
George J. Neilan, Petitioner Below,
                                                                                  March 12, 2015
Petitioner                                                                       RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                               SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
v.) No. 14-1340 (Nicholas County 14-D-51)                                          OF WEST VIRGINIA

Charlotte Y. Yeager, Respondent Below,
Respondent

                                  MEMORANDUM DECISION

         Petitioner, George J. Neilan, by counsel Lyne Ranson, appeals an Order of the Circuit
Court of Nicholas County, West Virginia, entered on November 19, 2014, refusing his petition for
appeal from an order of the family court entered on October 17, 2014, as interlocutory. The
October 17, 2014, family court order denied petitioner’s motion in limine to exclude any evidence
of assets of the Yeager Family Trust during the final hearing in the matter. The notice of appeal
was filed on December 19, 2014. Thereafter, on December 31, 2014, respondent, by counsel James
M. Cagle, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. On January 22, 2015, a scheduling order issued,
specifically stating that the appeal is docketed on the sole issue of whether the circuit court erred in
its finding and holding that the October 17, 2014, order of the family court is an evidentiary order
and not a final appealable order and that none of the evidentiary issues will be considered in the
appeal. Therefore, based upon that clarification of the issue to be included on appeal, the motion to
dismiss was refused. On February 24, 2015, counsel for respondent filed a motion to expedite. The
Court does hereby grant the motion to expedite.

        Having carefully reviewed the notice of appeal, the order of the family court, and the
decision of the circuit court, the Court is of the opinion that the decisional process would not be
significantly aided by briefing or oral argument. The Court therefore finds that this matter is
mature for consideration and upon application of the law, determines that a memorandum decision
summarily affirming the circuit court in this instance is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of
Appellate Procedure. In reviewing an order entered by a circuit court judge upon a review of, or
upon a refusal to review, a final order of a family court judge, we review questions of law de novo.
Carr v. Hancock, 216 W.Va. 474, 607 S.E.2d 803 (2004). The Court finds no substantial question
of law and affirms the decision of the circuit court.

        In the order dismissing the action, the circuit court noted that pursuant to West Virginia
Code Section 51-2A-14(a), the order of the family court is an evidentiary order not final for
purposes of appeal. Despite the family court’s attempt to couch its order as final by including the
statement “[T]his is a final order” and including the procedure for appellate review, the circuit
court correctly determined that the order was an evidentiary ruling and not subject to appellate
review.
       Accordingly, the order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County is affirmed, and this case is
dismissed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: March 12, 2015

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Robin Jean Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen Loughry II