Court Opinion

ID: 9632578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 11:19:41.223619+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:07:19.039571
License: Public Domain

BAKES, Justice,
concurring in part and concurring in the result in part:
I concur in all of the majority opinion except Part I in which I concur only in the result. The results reached in Part I of the majority opinion necessarily follows from our decisions in McClure v. Nampa Highway Dist., 102 Idaho 197, 628 P.2d 228 (1981), and Gavica v. Hanson, 101 Idaho 58, 608 P.2d 861 (1980), in which the Court held that the failure to post a warning sign did not fall within the discretionary function exception set out in I.C. § 6-904(1).