Court Opinion

ID: 7576406
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:21:56.103003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:36:21.307417
License: Public Domain

Eddie Hart was convicted, along with Grady Gibson, of the murder of Mrs. Dana Hart, Eddie Hart's wife. Hart and Gibson were tried jointly. For purpose of appeal, their convictions were consolidated and are now under submission in this court inEddie Hart v. State, 3 Div. 873, and Grady Gibson v. State, 3 Div. 823.
This is an appeal from the circuit court's denial of Hart's petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 20, Ala.R.Crim.P.Temp. Rule 20 proceedings are an outgrowth *Page 1196 
of the old coram nobis proceedings. The rule has long been that a coram nobis does not lie if a direct appeal is presently pending in the appellate court. Robinson v. State,396 So.2d 1089 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981); Summers v. State, 366 So.2d 336
(Ala.Cr.App. 1978), cert. denied, 366 So.2d 346 (Ala. 1979). We hold that this rule also applies to Rule 20 proceedings. Accordingly, the Rule 20 proceeding does not lie, and this appeal is due to be dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
All the Judges concur.