Court Opinion

ID: 9629149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 09:38:04.283555+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:38.759596
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
*395Dwiglit L. Schwab, Prank II. Hilton, Jr., William C. McCarthy, and Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland, for the petition.
Bichard Bryson and Windsor Calkins, Eugene, contra.
Before Perry, Chief Justice, and McAllister, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.
PEB CUBIAM.
In a stipulation accompanying a petition for rehearing the plaintiff has asked this court to apply Oregon Constitution, Art VII, § 3 (Amended), to enter a modified judgment eliminating all special damages instead of requiring a new trial. Since the only substantive error below involved the allowance of special damages, this is a proper case in which to modify the judgment. Our former opinion is modified to provide *396that upon receipt of the mandate the trial court should strike out special damages and enter judgment on the verdict for general damages only. It is so ordered. Petition for rehearing otherwise denied.