Court Opinion

ID: 2800770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-14 15:01:39.946594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:39.931762
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 14-3003
                         ___________________________

                   Amarjit Singh; Manjit Kaur; Dripinder Singh

                              lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners

                                            v.

             Loretta E. Lynch,1 Attorney General of the United States

                             lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                               Submitted: May 5, 2015
                                Filed: May 14, 2015
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and
citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

      1
       Loretta E. Lynch is substituted for her predecessor, Eric H. Holder, Jr., as the
Attorney General of the United States. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After
careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th
Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________

                                        -2-