Court Opinion

ID: 9647550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:39:47.8111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:54.444127
License: Public Domain

DONNELLY, Judge,
dissenting.
In State ex rel. Morasch v. Kimberlin, 654 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Mo.banc 1983), this Court held that prohibition will lie to prevent an excess of jurisdiction but “that we should not continue the unfettered use of the writ of prohibition to allow interlocutory review of trial court error.”
In State ex rel. McNary v. Hais, 670 S.W.2d 494, 497 (Mo.banc 1984), this Court held that prohibition will lie where “[r]ela-tors do not have adequate remedy by way of appeal.”
In this case, the trial court has jurisdiction and there is an adequate remedy by way of appeal. In my view, prohibition does not lie.
I respectfully dissent.