Court Opinion

ID: 4196218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-08-16 15:05:26.769207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:18.860840
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                          VICTOR H. CONCHA,
                              Appellant,

                                     v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                               No. 4D16-2046

                            [ August 16, 2017 ]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No.
562015CF002703A.

    Vincent James Benincasa of the Benincasa Law Firm, P.A., Vero Beach,
for appellant.

   Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

    Victor Concha appeals his sentence for ten counts of possession of child
pornography. Concha argues that the trial judge committed fundamental
error when he implied that he would not, as a general policy, consider
Concha’s mental health needs as a basis for downward departure. We
reverse and remand for resentencing before a different judge, because the
trial judge’s comments in this case are substantively indistinguishable
from those we found to constitute fundamental error in Fraser v. State,
201 So. 3d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

   Reversed and Remanded.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

                           *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.