Court Opinion

ID: 6774152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:47:41.066579+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:46.568847
License: Public Domain

On May 6, 1996, respondent Paul Pagac III filed a motion requesting that this court amend its decision of June 28, 1995. Respondent’s motion is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration and, as such, is not timely under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI. Whereas S.CtPrae.R. XI prohibits the filing of untimely motions for reconsideration,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken, effective May 10,1996.