Court Opinion

ID: 2888424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 20:08:11.303485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:32.318813
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-03-0285-CV

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL D

                                SEPTEMBER 4, 2003
                          ______________________________

                                   FLOYD HARDEMAN,

                                                         Appellant

                                             v.

                    REGIONAL ISLAMIC CHAPLAIN TALIB, ET AL.,

                                                Appellee
                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

                NO. 48,263-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING
                        _______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

       Floyd Hardeman (Hardeman) appeals from an order dismissing his lawsuit against

Regional Islamic Chaplain Talib, Senior Islamic Chaplain Shabazz, Senior Warden of

Clements Unit Keith Price (individually and in his official capacity), Regional Director John

Gilbert (individually and in his official capacity), Director Gary Johnson (individually and

in his official capacity), Chairman of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Allan

Polunsky (individually and in his official capacity), and Clements Unit Senior Chaplain

Murphy Rory (individually and in his official capacity). We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction.

       On May 8, 2000, and July 24, 2000, the trial court signed separate orders

dismissing Hardeman’s suit against all of the defendants. He subsequently filed a notice

of appeal on February 13, 2003, wherein he asserted that he was appealing from a

dismissal order signed on or about January 24, 2003. The clerk’s record before us does

not reflect the order mentioned in the notice exists. Thus, we contacted Hardeman, via

letter dated August 11, 2003, and advised him of this situation. We also directed him to

inform us of why we had jurisdiction over his appeal, which response was due no later than

August 21, 2003. To date, a response has not been received.

       To be timely and depending upon various circumstances, a notice of appeal must

be filed within 30 or 90 days after a final order disposing of the case is signed. TEX . R.

APP . P. 26.1(a). Here, approximately two and one-half years lapsed between the dates on

which the trial court signed the dismissal orders disposing of the case and the date on

which the notice of appeal was filed. Because a timely notice of appeal is essential to

invoke our appellate jurisdiction, In re A.L.B., 56 S.W.3d 651, 652 (Tex. App.--Waco 2003,

no pet.), and Hardeman did not file one, we cannot but dismiss the appeal. Id.

       Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                 Per Curiam

                                            2