Court Opinion

ID: 8679106
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:02:54.710909+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:28.088111
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Ernest Coward appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coward, No. 7:07-cr-00069-GEC-3 (W.D.Va. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.