Court Opinion

ID: 9627786
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 08:54:25.66323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:48:07.102855
License: Public Domain

SPENCE, J.
I dissent.
I am of the opinion that the trial court properly entered judgment for defendant, and that said judgment is in accord with the decision in Kahn v. Kahn, 123 Cal.App.2d 819 [268 P.2d 151]. I would not disapprove the Kahn ease, as does the majority opinion; and while the case of Worthley v. Worthley, 44 Cal.2d 465 [283 P.2d 19], cited in the majority opinion, is not directly in point, I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in that case.
I would affirm the judgment.
Shenk, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.
Respondent’s petition for a rehearing was denied March 28, 1956. Shenk, J., Spence, J., and Schauer, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Dooling, J. pro tern., participated therein in place of McComb, J.