Court Opinion

ID: 3113741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:18:19.151438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:56.626800
License: Public Domain

02-11-331-CV

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-11-00331-CV
 
 

William Mayo

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Technical Transportation

 

APPELLEE

 
 
------------
 
FROM THE 352nd
District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1] AND
JUDGMENT
------------
 
We
have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Remand.”  The motion is GRANTED. 
We set aside, without regard to the merits, the trial court=s
judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in
accordance with the parties’ agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P.
42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387,
388 (Tex. 1995); In re Ortega, 225 S.W.3d 610, 610–11 (Tex. App.––El
Paso 2006, no pet.).
Costs
of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let
execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
 
                                                                             PER
CURIAM
PANEL: 
DAUPHINOT,
GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

 
DELIVERED:
 March 15, 2012

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.