Court Opinion

ID: 9879734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 18:39:13.858317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:01.246568
License: Public Domain

EATON, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s disposition, except for those portions dealing with the evidence produced by Aubuchon to support her contract and unjust enrichment claims, from which I respectfully dissent. As to those claims, I believe that the district court erred in finding that the evidence presented did not raise triable issues of material fact, and would reverse. See Aubuchon v. Brock, No. 1 CA-CV 13-0451, 2015 WL 2383820 (Ariz. Ct. App. May 14, 2015); Aubuchon v. Brock, No. CV2011-014754 (Super. Ct. Maricopa Cty. Oct. 26, 2016).