Court Opinion

ID: 7271307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:28:39.138067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:46.786424
License: Public Domain

CCA 20081031. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.