Court Opinion

ID: 4276236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-17 20:00:32.042755+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:53:00.589916
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAY 17 2018
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    17-50262

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00104-WQH

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
JAVIER MORENO-MENDOZA,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of California
                   William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before:      SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

      Javier Moreno-Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 19-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      Moreno-Mendoza argues that the district court improperly calculated the

applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. The government contends that this appeal

is barred by a valid appeal waiver. We review de novo whether a defendant has

waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Harris, 628 F.3d 1203, 1205 (9th

Cir. 2011). The court imposed a sentence below the Guidelines range

recommended by the government at sentencing. Thus, the terms of the appeal

waiver in Moreno-Mendoza’s plea agreement unambiguously encompass this

sentencing appeal. See id. at 1205-06. Accordingly, we dismiss pursuant to the

valid waiver. See id. at 1207.

      DISMISSED.

                                        2                                   17-50262