Court Opinion

ID: 5533671
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:15:13.655601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:39.024064
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, by providing that the arbitration proceed under the terms of the arbitration clause in the insurance policy, and, as so modified, affirmed.
Generally, arbitration is to proceed according to the provisions in the contract (see Matter of Siegel [Lewis], 40 NY2d 687; Matter of Astoria Med. Group [Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y.], 11 NY2d 128; Matter of Lipschutz [Gutwirth], 304 NY 58). Under the contract here, one arbitrator is chosen by each party and these two then choose a third. The contract provides further only that arbitration is subject to “[l]ocal rules of law as to procedure and evidence.” However convenient the procedures of the American Arbitration Association may be, New York law does not mandate and the out-of-State policy does not authorize the court to direct proceedings before that body.
*842Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order modified, with costs to appellant, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.