Court Opinion

ID: 8847271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 17:01:12.71783+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:22.876085
License: Public Domain

GKEEN, District Judge.
This claim is a meritorious one, and should be paid. The services for which wages are claimed by the libelant were faithfully performed, and should be compensated for. But, unfortunately for the libelant, he has mistaken his remedy for the wrong done Mm. The libelant was employed simply as a ship-keeper or watchman of the dredge America, a domestic vessel, while she was lying in port. Such employment, and the consequent services rendered, are not maritime, and cannot be the basis of a maritime lien. The E. A. Barnard, 2 Fed. Rep. 712; The Island City, 1 Low. 375. The libel must therefore be dismissed.
In this case, however, the claimant has been guilty of laches. The libel was- duly tiled, and the cause proceeded regularly, to a decree pro confesso, and an order for sale of the dredge. Then, for the first time, does the claimant intervene, and asks the indulgence of the court, seeking to open the decree pro confesso, and to interpose the defense which has been made. Had the defense been different in character, it is very doubtful .whether the court would have interfered. But, having felt constrained to permit the defense to be made, it grants such permission to the claimant, but only upon the terms that the claimant shall pay all taxable costs thus far incurred by the libelant in the cause.
Upon payment of these costs, let the libel be dismissed.