Court Opinion

ID: 600932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:23:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:57.598066
License: Public Domain

986 F.2d 1412
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.David BRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James N. ROLLINS, Warden;  Bernard Smith, Assistant Warden,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-7160.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  February 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-757-N)
David Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bright v. Rollins, No. CA-91-757-N (D. Md. Nov. 2, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED