Court Opinion

ID: 9547334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:45:53.968852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:17:37.408674
License: Public Domain

*315HUNTLEY, Justice,
concurring specially.
Although I concur in the majority opinion, were there a proper factual basis in this record to raise the issue of whether the classification of I.C. § 5-219 is constitutional I would join the dissent of Justice Bistline. That is to say, I agree with the dissent that the legislature’s limitation of the application of the “discovery rule” to foreign objects violates the “equal protection clause.” However, this record reflects that the plaintiff did not file her claim within one year of the date she knew or reasonably should have known of her cause of action. Therefore the issue is not presented.