Court Opinion

ID: 998916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:17:57.342308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:10.171523
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARK CHRISTOPHER POE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-144, CA-97-933-2)

Submitted:   May 25, 1999                   Decided:    June 8, 1999

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Christopher Poe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Francis Porcarelli,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mark Christopher Poe seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.    See United States v. Poe, Nos. CR-93-144;

CA-97-933-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 1998).   We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2