Court Opinion

ID: 1007840
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:31:21.490288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:16.897185
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Bradley Dean Bidgood appeals the district court’s margin order denying his mo
   
   *666
   
  tion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
  
   See United States v. Bidgood,
  
  No. CR-95-32 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.