Court Opinion

ID: 9895608
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-07 22:01:09.585524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:39.856060
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13122   Document: 20-1    Date Filed: 11/07/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-13122
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       In Re: ELLINGSWORTH          RESIDENTIAL       COMMUNITY
       ASSOCIATION, INC.,
                                                              Debtor.
       ________________________________________________
       ALICE GUAN,
                                                   Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       ELLINGSWORTH            RESIDENTIAL            COMMUNITY
       ASSOCIATION, INC.,

                                                Respondent-Appellee.
USCA11 Case: 23-13122      Document: 20-1     Date Filed: 11/07/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-13122

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                     D.C. Docket No. 6:22-cv-00699-WWB
                           ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Alice Guan, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district
       court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her appeal from a
       bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion for summary judg-
       ment. The district court’s order is not final and appealable, how-
       ever, because the bankruptcy court’s decision below did not com-
       pletely resolve all issues pertaining to Guan’s claim. See Mich. State
       Univ. v. Asbestos Settlement Tr. (In re Celotex Corp.), 700 F.3d 1262,
       1265 (11th Cir. 2012).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.