Court Opinion

ID: 4274107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-10 16:43:55.885623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:51:20.936926
License: Public Domain

People v Armstrong (2018 NY Slip Op 03457)

People v Armstrong

2018 NY Slip Op 03457

Decided on May 10, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 10, 2018

Friedman, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

6534 3631/14 3751/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vAntonio Armstrong, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Katharine Skolnick of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Yetter of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padro, J.), rendered December 1, 2015 and a judgment of the same court (Edwina Richardson-Mendelson, J.), rendered December 14, 2016,
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MAY 10, 2018
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.