Court Opinion

ID: 2899398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 00:04:49.820727+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:53.194638
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0490-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

APRIL 29, 2009

______________________________

CERTAIN PRIMARY UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, 

LONDON OF M.E.C. &/OR MOBILE EXPRESS CORPORATION AND

CERTAIN EXCESS UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON

OF M.E.C. &/OR MOBILE EXPRESS CORPORATION , APPELLANTS

V.

HERRING BANK F/K/A HERRING NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 93,282-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

On April 27, 2009, appellants Certain Primary Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London of M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation and Certain Excess Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London of M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation filed a motion to dismiss their appeal. According to the motion, the parties reached a settlement.  In the motion, counsel for appellants states that he conferred with counsel for appellee and counsel for appellee does not oppose the motion.  Appellants further request taxation of appellate costs against them. 

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

Justice