Court Opinion

ID: 9377531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-08 07:08:56.499536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:14.813565
License: Public Domain

VACATE AND DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 6, 2023

                                    S   In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-22-01236-CV

                          PORESHA POLK, Appellant
                                   V.
                         LA HACIENDA APT., Appellee

                On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                            Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02474-D

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                    Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Garcia
                            Opinion by Justice Reichek
      We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal in the underlying forcible

detainer lawsuit because it appeared the appealed judgment was signed outside the

trial court’s plenary power. We directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing

the jurisdictional issue. Appellant filed a letter brief. Appellee did not.

      On July 7, 2022, the trial court dismissed the case. One hundred and twenty-

three days later, on November 7, 2022, well after its plenary power expired, the

trial court vacated the dismissal order and reinstated the case. See TEX. R. CIV. P.
329b.     The trial court signed the appealed judgment on November 17, 2022

awarding possession of the premises, past-due rent, and attorney’s fees to appellee.

        A judgment signed after the trial court’s plenary power has expired is void.

See State ex. rel Latty v. Owens, 907 S.W.2d 484, 486 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam).

When an appeal is taken from a void judgment, an appellate court cannot reach the

merits of the appeal but can only vacate the void judgment and dismiss the appeal.

See id.

        Although appellant filed a letter brief, her arguments are difficult to

decipher. She appears to assert that the trial court’s November 17th judgment is

void and the July 7th dismissal order is the final judgment. We agree.

        Because the appealed judgment was signed outside the trial court’s plenary

power, we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal. Accordingly, we

vacate the November 17th judgment and dismiss the appeal. See id. The July 7th

dismissal order is the final judgment in the case.

                                               /Amanda L. Reichek/
                                               AMANDA L. REICHEK
                                               JUSTICE

221236F.P05

                                         –2–
                                 S
                           Court of Appeals
                    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                JUDGMENT

PORESHA POLK, Appellant                     On Appeal from the County Court at
                                            Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-22-01236-CV        V.                Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02474-
                                            D.
LA HACIENDA APT., Appellee                  Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek.
                                            Justices Nowell and Garcia
                                            participating.

     In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s
November 17, 2022 judgment is VACATED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 6th day of March 2023.

                                      –3–