Court Opinion

ID: 9401069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-09 21:00:49.076522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:50.480795
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7210      Doc: 13         Filed: 06/08/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7210

        JOE LEE FULGHAM,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        UNKNOWN,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00637-AWA-RJK)

        Submitted: May 26, 2023                                              Decided: June 8, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7210      Doc: 13         Filed: 06/08/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a jury

        trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

        the district court’s order. Fulgham v. Unknown, No. 2:20-cv-00637-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va.

        Sept. 12, 2022). We deny Fulgham’s motion for damages. We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2