Court Opinion

ID: 992162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:47:33.426964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:50.511146
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-2844

JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA VITAL RECORDS,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-96-870-N)

Submitted:   May 1, 1997                      Decided:   May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Carol Smith Nance, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil suit for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon
v. Virginia, No. CA-96-870-N (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 1996). We deny Ap-

pellant's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2