Court Opinion

ID: 8683402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 06:34:15.434168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:32.313473
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Rankins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his pro se motion to be released on personal recognizance. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rankins seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Rankins’ motions for a change of venue and for appointment of new counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED