Court Opinion

ID: 2891020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 21:07:05.987915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.280440
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-04-0049-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL B

                                 FEBRUARY 23, 2004

                         ______________________________

                           SHANNON HAYES, APPELLANT

                                           V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                       _________________________________

           FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

            NO. 2003-401754; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

                         _______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Shannon M. Hayes, appellant, pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary of a

habitation and on March 5, 2003, the trial court sentenced him to five years confinement

in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The court

suspended his sentence and placed him on community supervision. He filed a pro se

notice of appeal with this court on February 9, 2004.
       Our appellate jurisdiction over a criminal appeal is triggered through a timely notice

of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In the absence of

a notice of appeal timely filed in compliance with the requirements of Rule of Appellate

Procedure 26, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the

appeal in a criminal case, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). As applicable here, Rule of Appellate

Procedure 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 30 days after

the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within 90 days after imposition

of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed.

       Here, the court imposed and then suspended Hayes’ sentence on March 5, 2003.

The record before us does not indicate whether he filed a motion for new trial. In any event,

his notice of appeal, filed over ten months later, was untimely. Appellant’s failure to file a

timely notice of appeal prevents this court from having jurisdiction over his appeal.

       Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                    James T. Campbell
                                                        Justice

Do not publish.

                                              -2-