Court Opinion

ID: 5816005
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 19:53:59.375943+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:59.940271
License: Public Domain

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The Supreme Court properly considered, among other things, the defendant’s status as a high-level member of a drug trafficking enterprise. Under the circumstances, substantial justice dictated the denial of the motion (see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 748 [2009]). Florio, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Belen, JJ., concur.