Court Opinion

ID: 3164242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-21 16:00:59.404633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:44.107244
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Kakawi Yachting, Inc. (Kakawi) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Marlow Marine Sales, Inc., Marlow Marine Services, Inc., Marlow-Merrill-Stevens, LLC, David Marlow, Michael Canriova, Marlow Yachts, Ltd., and'Marlow Yachts Ltd., Inc. (collectively, Marlow) on all claims. Kakawi alleges that the luxury yacht it purchased from Marlow was defective because it did not meet the unrestricted navigation standards required under the purchase contract.
 

  After a review of the district court’s complete and detailed order, the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. Given our highly deferential standard of review, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion by the district court in excluding Colin Pegrum’s expert testimony and repairs estimate (Estimate) when notice was insufficient to meet disclosure obligations under Rule 26(a)(2).
  
   See
  
  Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2). Secondly, we find no error in the entry of summary judgment because Kakawi is unable to prove damages without Pegrum’s testimony and Estimate. After a searching review of the briefs, complaint, and record, we are unable to find a request by Kakawi to the court for the remedy of specific performance. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
 

  AFFIRMED.