Court Opinion

ID: 728262
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 10:43:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:02.493866
License: Public Domain

98 F.3d 1336
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Lamark M. FOGLE, a/k/a Big Mark, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6863.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 15, 1996.Decided Oct. 15, 1996.

Lamark M. Fogle, Appellant Pro Se.  William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia;  John Granville Douglass, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, motion.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss substantially on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Fogle, Nos.  CR-96-79;  CA-96-216 (E.D.Va. May 10, 1996);  see Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.