Court Opinion

ID: 3674282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:21:39.829313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:21:43.158890
License: Public Domain

The transcript of the record in this case is fatally defective. It does not appear from it that a court was held by a judge at the place allowed by law or, indeed, at all, or that a grand jury was drawn and charged. The appears sent up purport to be copies of some parts of a record, and are disorderly. They fail to give this Court jurisdiction to decide the question intended to be sent up for review.
The case is substantially like that of S. v. Butts, 91 N.C. 524, and we might, ex mero motu, order the writ of certiorari to issue, commanding the clerk of the Superior Court to certify to this Court a full transcript of the record. But the Attorney-General moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the appellant has not filed in this Court a *Page 473 
proper transcript, and we deem it proper to grant the motion, as in looking to the case settled upon appeal for this Court the questions intended to be raised are without merit.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is allowed.
Dismissed.
Cited: S. v. McDowell, ante, 542; S. v. Farrar, 103 N.C. 413; S. v.Preston, 104 N.C. 735; S. v. May, 118 N.C. 1205;S. v. Stafford, 203 N.C. 603.
(560)