Court Opinion

ID: 2925803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:27:19.196907+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:41.706990
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-00521-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
RUBEN ESQUEDA, 	APPELLANT,

v.

KATHY JO ESQUEDA,	APPELLEE. 
_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 343rd District Court 
of Live Oak County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant's brief in the above cause was due on December 17, 2007.  On February
6, 2008, the Court notified appellant, who is proceeding pro se, that the appeal was subject
to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant reasonably explained
his failure to file the brief and the appellee was not significantly injured by his failure to
timely file the brief.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).  Appellant's response, filed
with this Court on February 15, 2008, fails to provide a reasonable explanation for his
failure to file the brief and further fails to request an extension of time for said filing. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See id.

							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam delivered 
and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.