Court Opinion

ID: 9827724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 17:48:18.988457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:35.327818
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In original opinion, it is stated that the suit was to recover rents from April 10, 1915, to June 14, 1917. This is an erroneous statement. The suit was to recover the rents from April 10, 1915, to February 8, 1916.
Appellee earnestly insists that the opinion of this court is in conflict with Rackley v. Fowlkes, 89 Tex. 613, 36 S. W. 77. We do not so regard it. On the contrary, that case is regarded as decisively supporting the conclusion of this court that the former suit-does not bar a recovery of the rents from April 10, 1915, to February 8, 1916.
Motion for rehearing overruled.