Court Opinion

ID: 998175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:07:15.642739+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:46.887233
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7510

LORENZO R. MCKNIGHT,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

VIRGINIA PROBATION & PAROLE DISTRICT        34;
BARBARA COOKE; LESTER WINGROVE,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-98-570-3)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo R. McKnight, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lorenzo McKnight seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

McKnight’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny McKnight’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appeal-

ability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See McKnight v. Virginia Probation & Parole District 34,

No. CA-98-570-3 (Oct. 7, 1998).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2