Court Opinion

ID: 692497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:17:01+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:51.840804
License: Public Domain

51 F.3d 268
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Harvey P. SHORT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.William SMITH, Warden;  Attorney General of The State ofMaryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-6370.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  January 31, 1995.Decided:  March 30, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-2754-H)
Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Short v. Smith, No. CA-93-2754-H (D. Md. Nov. 10, 1993 & Mar. 25, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.