Court Opinion

ID: 2923544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:31:59.819641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:55:41.564848
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-03-449-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
 
 
IN
THE INTEREST OF TRAVIS JAMES DILLON WARREN, 
A
MINOR CHILD,
____________________________________________________________
 
                              On
appeal from the 36th District Court
                                        of
Aransas County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
         Before
Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez
                                 Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 
Appellants, James
Warren and Lynn Warren, perfected an appeal from a judgment
entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas
County, Texas, in cause number A-93-0285-CV-A.  No clerk=s record has been filed due to appellants= failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the
clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record.  

If the trial
court clerk fails to file the clerk=s record because the appellant failed to pay or make
arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without
payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Notice was given
to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellants were given ten days to explain why
the cause should not be dismissed. 
Appellants responded to this Court=s notice; however, said response fails to establish
that appellants are entitled to proceed without payment of costs.
The Court, having
examined and fully considered the documents on file,  is of the opinion that the appeal should be
dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 26th day of January,
2006.