Court Opinion

ID: 2722360
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-30 05:00:27.7736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:02:50.642629
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-20002      Document: 00512751814         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/29/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 14-20002
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                          August 29, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAID OCTAVIO FLORES MARQUEZ, also known as Said Flores, also known
as Said Flores Marquez, also known as Said Octavio Flores-Marquez, also
known as Said Obdulio Flores, also known as Said, also known as Flores Said,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:13-CR-479-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Said Octavio Flores
Marquez (Flores) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-20002    Document: 00512751814     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/29/2014

                                 No. 14-20002

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2