Court Opinion

ID: 2964412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:25:14.653425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:11:10.039335
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1444 

                                SCOTT PHILIP BROOKER,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                 COMMISSIONER, NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________
                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Scott Brooker on brief pro se.
            _____________
            Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Stephen J. Judge, Senior
            _________________                        ________________
        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                  November 26, 1996
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   Appellant Scott  Philip Brooker  sued
                      __________

            defendants  under 42 U.S.C.    1983, alleging  that they were

            deliberately  indifferent to  his  serious medical  needs  in

            violation of the  Eighth Amendment. He  now appeals from  the

            district  court's grant  of summary  judgment  in defendants'

            favor.    After  careful  review  of  the  record, we  affirm

            substantially for the  reasons given by the district court in

            its decision dated April 1, 1996.

                      Affirmed.
                      _________

                                         -2-