Court Opinion

ID: 7428093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:50:16.210954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:26.131598
License: Public Domain

FRUGÉ, Judge.
For the reasons given in Wallace M. Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Company, Clifton Auzenne, Clarence Batiste, Ranger County Mutual Insurance Company and Melvin Steely, 212 So.2d 246 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), No. 2307 on our docket, consolidated herewith for trial purposes, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs.
Affirmed.
HOOD, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co., 212 So.2d 246.