Court Opinion

ID: 2928090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-12 00:59:45.421249+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:39:26.726249
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 13, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 13, 2002.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NOS. 14-02-00105-CR &
     
14-02-00106-CR
____________
 
DERRICK THOMAS, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On
Appeal from the 174th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial
Court Cause Nos. 870,597 & 871,189
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M  O
P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses of injury
to a child and assault on a household member. 
The trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed appellant on
community supervision for five years in each case.  The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt
alleging appellant had failed to comply with the terms and conditions of his
community supervision.  After a hearing,
the trial court granted the State=s motion, found appellant guilty, and
sentenced him to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of
the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 
Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes that
the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), by
presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are
no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Opinion
filed June 13, 2002.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson,
Fowler, and Edelman. 
Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).