Court Opinion

ID: 9497020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 16:41:41.853592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:57:57.586710
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Appellant filed a petition for rehearing en banc.
A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority- of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc.
Judges Luttig, Michael, Motz and King voted to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins and Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Williams, Traxler, Gregory, Shedd and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc. Judge Williams wrote an *798opinion respecting the denial of rehearing and Judge Luttig wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing.
The Court denies the petition for rehearing en banc.
Entered at the direction of Judge Williams.