Court Opinion

ID: 4153866
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-20 07:15:34.460429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:16.516210
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                         TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                No. 10-17-00051-CV

MARK SERVINSKY, PE
AND SERVINSKY ENGINEERING, PLLC,
                                                           Appellants
v.

CAROLINES GARDEN, LLC,
                                                           Appellee

                          From the 413th District Court
                             Johnson County, Texas
                         Trial Court No. DC-C201600332

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On February 21, 2017, appellants, Mark Servinsky, PE and Servinsky Engineering,

PLLC, filed a notice of appeal with the Johnson County District Clerk. In their notice of

appeal, appellants indicated their desire to appeal from the trial court’s December 16,

2016 order denying their motion to dismiss. Additionally, in their notice of appeal,

appellants indicated that the trial court’s December 16, 2016 order is an appealable,

interlocutory order under section 150.002(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
Code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 150.002(f) (West 2011) (“An order granting

or denying a motion for dismissal is immediately appealable as an interlocutory order.”).

        Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(a) provides that “[a]ppeals from

interlocutory orders (when allowed by statute)” are considered accelerated appeals. TEX.

R. APP. P. 28.1(a).       Moreover, Rule 28.1(b) states that accelerated appeals must be

perfected “by filing a notice of appeal in compliance with Rule 25.1 within the time

allowed by Rule 26.1(b) or as extended by Rule 26.3. Filing a motion for new trial, any

other post-trial motion, or a request for findings of fact will not extend the time to perfect

an accelerated appeal.” Id. at R. 28.1(b). Rule 26.1(b), in particular, requires that, in an

accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the

judgment or order is signed. Id. at R. 26.1(b).

        In the instant case, the trial court signed its order denying appellants’ motion to

dismiss on December 16, 2016. However, appellants did not file their notice of appeal

until February 21, 2017, which is more than sixty-five days after the trial court’s December

16, 2016 order. Thus, appellants’ notice of appeal in this matter is untimely. In any event,

on February 23, 2017, appellants filed a motion to extend the time to file their notice of

appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(2).1

        1 In their motion for extension of time to file their notice of appeal, appellants contend that they did
not receive notice of the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss until February 10, 2017.
However, in their motion, appellants incorrectly note that the thirty-day deadline for filing a notice of
appeal applied in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. As noted earlier, this is an accelerated appeal, whereby
the notice of appeal was due within twenty days after the trial court signed its order. See id. at R. 26.1(b),
28.1. Furthermore, in support of their motion, appellants included an affidavit from Anna B. Newton, a

Servinsky, et al. v. Carolines Garden, LLC                                                              Page 2
        A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. See

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. 1997). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

26.3 provides that we may extend the time to file the notice of appeal “if, within 15 days

after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal,” the party files a notice of appeal in the

trial court and a motion for extension with this Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. “Once the

period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule 41(a)(2) [now Rule 26.3 of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the

appellate court’s jurisdiction.” Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. The last day appellants could

have filed for an extension was Friday, January 20, 2017.2 As noted above, the notice of

appeal was not filed until more than a month later on February 21, 2017. Because

appellants failed to file a notice of appeal and motion for extension within fifteen days of

the last day for timely filing a notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction to grant an extension.

See, e.g., Hawkins v. Malone, No. 10-15-00265-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9048 (Tex. App.—

legal assistant for appellant’s counsel. In her affidavit, Newton states that she did not begin inquiring about
the order until January 20, 2017, which, as noted hereinafter, was the last day that appellants could have
filed a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

         Despite the foregoing, on February 28, 2017, this Court informed appellants about the untimeliness
of their notice of appeal in light of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1(b) and 28.1. See TEX. R. APP. P.
26.1(b), 28.1, 42.3, 44.3. We also informed appellants that this appeal is subject to dismissal, unless
appellants provided grounds for continuing this appeal within twenty-one days of February 28, 2017.
Appellants filed a response the next day.

        2  We note that a motion for extension may be implied if a notice of appeal is filed within fifteen
days of the last day allowed for filing. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997). However,
even if the filing of the notice of appeal on February 21, 2017 implied a motion for extension of time to file
a notice of appeal, the implied motion still would not be within fifteen days of the last day allowed for
filing a notice of appeal. See id.

Servinsky, et al. v. Carolines Garden, LLC                                                              Page 3
Waco Aug. 27, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); Dade v. Greer, No. 12-08-00014-CV, 2008 Tex.

App. LEXIS 447 (Tex. App.—Tyler Jan. 23, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam); In re

A.F.T., No. 13-04-00257-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5652 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June

29, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.); White v. Bagley, No. 06-05-00104-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS

6835 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Aug. 23, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.); Rodriguez v. Round Rock

Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 03-01-00108-CV, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2189 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr.

5, 2001, no pet.) (per curiam). Appellants have failed to perfect an appeal. Accordingly,

we dismiss appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal and this

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

                                             AL SCOGGINS
                                             Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Davis, and
       Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed March 15, 2017
[CV06]

Servinsky, et al. v. Carolines Garden, LLC                                         Page 4