Court Opinion

ID: 9528742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:43:33.548999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:17.151834
License: Public Domain

BROWN, Justice, specially
concurring.
I agree with the majority of the court that the “Motion for Stay of Execution” should be denied. Petitioner’s execution date was set by the district court’s order dated May 13,1985. Petitioner waited over three months and now makes an eleventh hour appeal for a stay of execution.
Petitioner’s pleadings to invoke the jurisdiction of this court are the most defective imaginable. It appears that petitioner has deliberately flaunted and ignored well-known rules and procedures, challenging this court to act on patently defective pleadings.
I join the majority knowing that petitioner still has time to present to this court or another court a petition for relief that minimally complies with elementary rules and procedures.