Court Opinion

ID: 9445154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 21:21:17.87606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:08.847039
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
In a petition for rehearing appellee has urged that our decision be modified to give him an opportunity to present to the district court additional evidence as to the proper allocation of his expenses and net income between his two modestly remunerative activities. However, that which he seeks is a function of the administrative agency rather than the district court, which exercises a reviewing function. It may well be that evidence can be adduced to enable a more accurate allocation than has been made by the Social Security Administration. But it is not for us to say whether the administrative agency, if requested, should or would now permit the reopening of the case for such additional proof and reconsideration.
The petition for rehearing will be denied.