Court Opinion

ID: 9941236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 12:01:59.457367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:25.200595
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRAD ANDREWS, EUGENIO                        §
BALLESTEROS, RICHARD                         §
BEDDOW, LOREN BENDER,                        §
DANIEL BROWN, NORBERT DEAN,                  §   No. 222, 2023
DANIEL DECKER, HOWARD                        §
DEMSKY, ROI EWELL,                           §
THIRUNELLAI GANESHAN,                        §
STEVEN GLASHOWER, DAVID                      §   Court Below: Court of Chancery of
HAMMER, MICHAEL HARTMAN,                     §   the State of Delaware
SCOTT HELMSTEDTER, RONALD                    §
LOIDA, DONALD MILLS, TERRY                   §
PRATHER, ROY RIEVE, and                      §
CHARLES WETESNIK,                            §   C.A. No. 2020-0955
                                             §
                   Defendants Below,         §
                   Appellants,               §
                                             §
      v.                                     §
                                             §
SEAWORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,                §
                                             §
                  Plaintiff Below,           §
                  Appellee.                  §
                                             §

                           Submitted: February 14, 2024
                           Decided: February 15, 2024

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

                                     ORDER

      This 15th day of February, 2024, after careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in the Letter Opinion dated May 19, 2023, and the Order dated May

26, 2023 granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to

Dismiss Counterclaims.

      NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

                                           BY THE COURT:

                                           /s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
                                           Justice

                                       2