Court Opinion

ID: 2964624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:28:26.846456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:14.829624
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                              _________________________

          No. 96-1644

                                    SIDNEY ABBOTT,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                               RANDON BRAGDON, D.M.D.,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                              _________________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                              _________________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________

                            Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                     ____________________

                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________

                              _________________________

               David G.  Webbert and Bennett  H. Klein, with  whom Johnson,
               _________________     _________________             ________
          Webbert  &  Laubenstein and  Gay  and Lesbian  Advocates  were on
          _______________________      ___________________________
          brief, for plaintiff Sidney Abbott.
               John W. McCarthy,  with whom  Brent A. Singer  and Rudman  &
               ________________              _______________      _________
          Winchell were on brief, for defendant Randon Bragdon, D.M.D.
          ________

                              _________________________

                                    March 5, 1997
                              _________________________

                    Per  Curiam.  This is  a protective appeal,  taken by a
                    Per  Curiam.
                    ___________

          prevailing  plaintiff  as a  precaution,  should  we see  fit  to

          reverse or vacate a summary judgment entered in  her favor by the

          district  court.  We have  today issued an  opinion affirming the

          summary  judgment.   See  Abbott v.  Bragdon,  No. 96-1643.    We
                               ___  ______     _______

          therefore dismiss this appeal as moot.

          Appeal dismissed.  No costs.
          Appeal dismissed.  No costs.
          ________________   ________

                                          2