Court Opinion

ID: 4505346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-02-06 19:00:24.33459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:22.182298
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-40142      Document: 00515300487         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/06/2020

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                      February 6, 2020
                                    No. 19-40142
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Conference Calendar                        Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TAVORI TERRELL JACKSON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:18-CR-142-2

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Tavori Terrell Jackson has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Jackson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40142    Document: 00515300487    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/06/2020

                                No. 19-40142

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2