Court Opinion

ID: 4726884
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:52:29.56743+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:07:52.800073
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, C. J. —
The decree from which this appeal was taken was entered on June 22,1891, and notice of appeal was served on counsel for respondents on December 17, 1891.
The evidence introduced at the trial in -the court below is certified up to this court, but it is neither attached to, nor embodied in, any statement of facts. Indeed, no statement of facts was ever settled or signed by the judge, or even filed in the cause, and, for that reason, the respondents move this court to dismiss the appeal. Appellant, in opposition. to the motion, insists that, inasmuch as it appears that all of the evidence is in the record, the appeal ought not to be dismissed, but that the court should proceed to re-try the cause upon the record as it is. But the statute provides that in all cases the party appealing may have any *538fact or facts, not already a part of the record, made so by a statement of facts, and that, in cases like this, the statement of facts must contain, not only all the testimony on which the cause was tried below, but also all the objections or exceptions taken to the reception or rejection of the same. Code Proc., § 1423. It is evident from the foregoing provision of the code that it is necessary to have something more than the mere evidence before us before we can proceed to try a cause de novo in this court.
The testimony cannot properly be considered by this court, except it be embodied in a statement of facts certified as required by law, and there being no such statement in the record, the appeal must be dismissed.
Dunbar, Hoyt, Stiles and Scott, JJ., concur.