Court Opinion

ID: 9398274
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-30 18:09:11.576459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:31.865111
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Douglas, 2023-Ohio-1791.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                           ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                TRUMBULL COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                     CASE NO. 2022-T-0102

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                   Criminal Appeal from the
        - vs -                                     Court of Common Pleas

DEVONTE JAMES DOUGLAS,
                                                   Trial Court No. 2021 CR 01072
                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                              OPINION

                                        Decided: May 30, 2023
                                         Judgment: Affirmed

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, and Ryan J. Sanders, Assistant
Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH
44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Edward F. Borkowski, Jr., P.O. Box 609151, Cleveland, OH 44109 (For Defendant-
Appellant).

JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.

        {¶1}     Appellant, Devonte Douglas, appeals his convictions of Aggravated Murder,

Kidnapping, and Tampering with Evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the

judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas.

        {¶2}     On December 22, 2021, The Trumbull County Grand Jury indicted Appellant

on 3 counts: Aggravated Murder, an unclassified felony in violation of R.C. 2903.01(A),

Kidnapping, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2905.01, and Tampering with
Evidence, a third-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2921.12(A)(1). Appellant pled not

guilty to all counts.

       {¶3}    On February 7, 2022, Appellant filed a Motion for Competency Evaluation

and a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. The trial court ordered a competency

evaluation and ordered the examiner to transcribe, in a competency report, her opinions,

findings, and reasons supporting her findings. Dr. Jessica Hart conducted the evaluation

and prepared a competency report. Both parties stipulated to the findings in the written

competency report, in which Dr. Hart opined that Appellant was competent to stand trial

and assist in his defense.

       {¶4}    On April 13, 2022, the court held a competency hearing. In its judgment

entry on April 13, the court journalized that: “This matter came on for hearing on April 13,

2022 on the issue of the Defendant’s competence to stand trial pursuant to ORC section

2945.371. * * * Based on the competency report and the stipulations made, the Court

finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the Defendant is capable of understanding

the nature and objectives of the proceedings against him and of assisting in his own

defense.”     It is unclear from the record whether anyone testified in person at the

competency hearing, but Dr. Hart was not present.

       {¶5}    On September 21, 2022, Appellant changed his plea to guilty on all counts.

       {¶6}    Appellant timely appeals and raises one assignment of error.

       {¶7}    Assignment of Error: “The trial court erred by failing to hold a competency

hearing.”

                                             2

Case No. 2022-T-0102
       {¶8}   Within his sole assignment of error, Appellant asserts that the trial court did

not hold a competency hearing and “merely issued a journal entry finding [Appellant]

competent.”

       {¶9}   The record here, including the court docket and the April 13, 2022 judgment

entry, demonstrates that the court held a competency hearing on April 13, 2022. The

judgment entry stated that the court held a competency hearing on April 13. There is

nothing in the record to suggest that the court did not hold the competency hearing.

       {¶10} Further, Appellant’s assertion that the court was required to hold a

competency hearing, in this instance, is also misguided. When a defendant stipulates to

findings in a competency report and the report finds the defendant competent to stand

trial, a trial court is not required to hold a hearing pursuant to R.C. 2945.37(B) because a

hearing is only needed to introduce evidence rebutting the presumption of competency

established in R.C. 2945.37(G). State v. Smith, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 95505, 2011-

Ohio-2400, ¶ 6.

       {¶11} Appellant’s assignment of error is without merit.

       {¶12} The judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,

concur.

                                             3

Case No. 2022-T-0102