Court Opinion

ID: 9945724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-28 15:04:13.854586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:39.559500
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                       Opinion filed February 28, 2024.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-2116
                     Lower Tribunal No. 21-41565 SP
                          ________________

      Indoor Environmental Restoration Now, Inc., etc.,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

            Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Chiaka
Ihekwaba, Judge.

     Tyler Law Firm, and Ryan C. Tyler, for appellant.

     Methe & Rothell, P.A., and Kristi Bergemann Rothell (West Palm
Beach), for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
     Affirmed. See § 627.7152(2)(a)7., Fla. Stat. (2021) (providing that an

assignment agreement must “[c]ontain a provision requiring the assignee to

indemnify and hold harmless the assignor from all liabilities, damages,

losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, should the

policy subject to the assignment agreement prohibit, in whole or in part, the

assignment of benefits”); id. (2)(d) (“An assignment agreement that does not

comply with this subsection is invalid and unenforceable.”); Fallstaff Grp.,

Inc. v. MPA Brickell Key, LLC, 143 So. 3d 1139, 1143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)

(reversing award of attorneys’ fees to assignee in indemnification action

where “the indemnification provision at issue does not by its terms provide

for [the assignee’s] recovery of fees and costs incurred in seeking

indemnification”); MVW Mgmt., LLC v. Regalia Beach Devs. LLC, 230 So.

3d 108, 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“[A] party to a contract cannot use an

indemnity clause to shift attorney fees between the parties unless the

language of the clause shows an intent to clearly and unambiguously shift

the fees.” (quoting NevadaCare, Inc. v. Dep’t of Human Servs., 783 N.W.2d

459, 471 (Iowa 2010))).

                                     2