Court Opinion

ID: 2066579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:13:40.108536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:49.269126
License: Public Domain

957 A.2d 1175 (2008)
LISS & MARION, P.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents
v.
RECORDEX ACQUISITION CORP. d/b/a Sourcecorp Healthserve and Sourcecorp Incorporated, Petitioners.
No. 725 EAL 2007.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 24, 2008.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal *1176 is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioners, are:
a. Does a private cause of action for breach of an implied contract arise out of a violation of the Medical Records Act?
b. Does the Medical Records Act require that copying of any records other than those stored on microfilm be billed at the rate specified for copying records stored on paper?
c. Do common issues of fact and law predominate among members of the class certified by the trial court?