Court Opinion

ID: 656461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:48.519615
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charlie STRINGFELLOW, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Flora B. BOYD, Warden;  Attorney General of the State ofNorth Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6767.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 18, 1993.Decided:  October 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.
Charlie Stringfellow, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Charlie Stringfellow seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Stringfellow v. Boyd, No. CA-91-3490-3 (D.S.C. July 15, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED