Court Opinion

ID: 665044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:29:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:57.987966
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 11
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Steven H. OKEN, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Sewall B. SMITH, Warden, Defendant Appellee.
Nos. 93-6872, 93-6938.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.Decided March 7, 1994.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.  (CA-93-2165-S)
Steven H. Oken, appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that these appeals are without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Oken v. Smith, No. CA-93-2165-S (D. Md. Aug. 11, 1993;  Aug. 20, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.