Court Opinion

ID: 9537877
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 07:26:14.483557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:07.723909
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING HENDLEY, Judge. Defendant filed a Motion for Rehearing"' and plaintiff answered. Defendant’s Mo- • tion for Rehearing was denied. Plaintiff now calls our attention for failure to award attorneys fees on the Motion for Rehearing pursuant to Kendrick v. Gackle Drilling Company, 71 N.M. 113, 376 P.2d 176 (1962). We have considered plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees, and being sufficiently advised in the premises,  It is ordered that plaintiff be and is hereby awarded an additional sum of $250.00 as and for his attorneys fees on said Motion for Rehearing; said attorneys fees to be in addition to any other attorney fees which were heretofore awarded on the appeal. It is so ordered. SPIESS, C. J., concurs. LaFEL E. OMAN, Justice, Supreme Court, dissents.