Court Opinion

ID: 6506364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:18:31.089478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:44.573372
License: Public Domain

STONE, J.—
In considering the motion to enter judgment nunc pro tunc, the primary court should have regarded only the record evidence.—Thompson v. Miller, 2 Stew. 470.
The evidence adduced was record evidence, and it authorized the correction of the judgment nunc pro nunc. Thompson v. Miller, supra; Brown v. Bartlett, 2 Ala. 29; Spence v. Rutledge, 11 Ala. 590,
The judgment being regular, and that judgment relating back to the time it was first rendered, it must be affirmed.