Court Opinion

ID: 3108372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:20:05.03189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:45.022352
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00622-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
JULIO LUIS NARANJO
IGLESIA A/K/A
JULIO LUIS NARANJO
IGLESIAS,                                               Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                  Appellee.

____________________________________________________________
 
                             On
Appeal from the 430th District Court 
                                        of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
            Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 
Appellant,
Julio Luis Naranjo Iglesia a/k/a Julio Luis Naranjo Iglesias, attempted to
perfect an appeal from a conviction for possession of marihuana.  We dismiss
the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence
in this matter was imposed on June 30, 2010, counsel filed a motion for new
trial on July 29, 2010, and notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 2010. 
On November 9, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it
appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and that the appeal would be
dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of
receipt of the Court=s directive.  Appellant has not filed
a response to the Court=s directive.  
Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when
notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed
or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Where a
timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed
within ninety days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).  The time
within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after
the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a
motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
Appellant
timely filed a motion for new trial.  Therefore, his notice of appeal was due
to have been filed on or before September 28, 2010.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).  Although the notice of appeal herein was filed
within the fifteen day time period, appellant did not file a motion for
extension of time to file his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.  See id.

This
Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed
notice of appeal.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App.
1996).  Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not
obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and
can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Slaton
v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  Appellant may be
entitled to an out‑of‑time appeal by filing a post‑conviction
writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;
however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this
Court.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
Ann. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex
parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
The
appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.                                                                                                                                     PER
CURIAM
 
Do not publish.
See Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 
10th day of February, 2011.