Court Opinion

ID: 683043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:44:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:46.125360
License: Public Domain

40 F.3d 1245
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Byron Lee WRAY, a/k/a Slick, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6847.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.Decided Nov. 3, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.  Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge.  (CR-89-127-D, CA-93-10-1)
Byron Lee Wray, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Wray, Nos.  CR-89-127-D;  CA-93-10-1 (M.D.N.C. June 9, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.