Court Opinion

ID: 9832296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:47:40.498704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:45.364384
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The statement in the first part of the quotation from the agreed statement of facts, brought forward in the original opinion, that appellees’ property — the property in controversy — -was “located several miles from the City of Port Arthur, and near the Port Arthur-Orange Highway,” supports our fact conclusion that appellees’ property did not adjoin the corporate limits of the City of Port Arthur. Appellants’ assignment against this fact conclusion is overruled.
The map attached by appellants to their motion for rehearing has no place in the record and, for that reason, is ordered stricken from the motion for rehearing.
Motion for rehearing is in all things overruled.