Court Opinion

ID: 63467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 04:57:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:01.124250
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 20, 2008
                                     No. 07-51077
                                  Conference Calendar                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                              Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SALVADOR ANTONIO DAMIAN LOPEZ, also known as Salvador Cruz Guillen,
also know as Salvador Antoni Damian Lopez, also known as Don Chava, also
known as Pappy, also known as Apa

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:03-CR-2338-3

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Antonio Damian Lopez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Damian Lopez has not filed a timely response.
Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.          Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 07-51077

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2