Court Opinion

ID: 2965154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:36:19.126423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:00.221899
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-2269

                                    FRIEDRICH LU,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                 HARSHBARGER, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                          Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Friedrich Lu on brief pro se.
            ____________
            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  and  Juliana deHaan  Rice,
            __________________                           ____________________
        Assistant  Attorney   General,  on   appellees'  motion  for   summary
        disposition and memorandum of law.

                                 ____________________

                                   February 2, 1998
                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.  Upon review of the record and consideration
                 __________

            of  the  arguments  raised  in  appellant's  briefs  and  the

            appellees' motion  for  summary disposition,  we perceive  no

            substantial reason to overturn the order of dismissal.

                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___

                                         -2-