Court Opinion

ID: 7095755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:10:47.977647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:14.552599
License: Public Domain

Cole, J.
It appears by the affidavits of the jurors that the jury stood eight for plaintiff and four for defendant, and being unable to otherwise agree, they prepared twenty-four slips of paper, and wrote ‘ plaintiff’ on twelve of them, and ‘ defendant ’ on the other twelve, and put them all in a hat; one of their number was then blindfolded, and drew from the hat twelve of the papers, upon seven of which there was the word (plaintiff,’ and on five, was the word ‘ defendant.’ Thereupon the jury wrote out and returned the verdict for plaintiff. It also appears that all the jurors, except two, agreed in advance to be bound by the result of such drawing, and that it was at once accepted by all. Whether the two who did not agree in advance to be bound by the drawing, were, before it, for plaintiff or defendant, does not appear. But, in any event, the effect of the drawing was to preclude discussion and further consideration by at least two of the four jurors, who were prior to it, for the defendant, and had agreed in advance to be bound by the drawing. This is sufficient to taint and vitiate the Verdict. Nothing short of a free and deliberate finding, made upon a conscientious conviction of the judgments of all the jurors, will satisfy the law.
Reversed.