Court Opinion

ID: 9656373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 19:47:16.08882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:32.079409
License: Public Domain

WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.
(concurring). Although I concur in the result reached in this case, I do not do so on the basis of the majority analysis in Tift v. Forage *112King Industries, Inc., 108 Wis. 2d 72, 322 N.W.2d 14 (1982). The facts of this case do not fit under any exception to the sound intercorporate theory of nonlia-bility of a successor corporation. In accordance with my dissenting opinion in Tift, I concur in the result reached in this case.