Court Opinion

ID: 6739222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:20:43.516454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:54.071882
License: Public Domain

Christianson, Cb. J.
(concurring). Tbe contention of tbe appellant is: (1 )That its motion for a directed verdict should have been granted; (2) that tbe court erred in its instructions; and (3) that tbe verdict is excessive.
In my opinion tbe questions of negligence, contributory negligence, *467and proximate cause were for, and properly submitted to, tbe jury. I find no prejudicial error in tbe instructions; and I do not believe tbat tbe verdict can be said to be excessive as a matter of law. Hence, I concur in an affirmance.