Court Opinion

ID: 4284931
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-15 18:00:20.253025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:27.753808
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-41228      Document: 00514514714        Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/15/2018

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                   No. 17-41228                               FILED
                                 Summary Calendar                         June 15, 2018
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

VALENTIN JASSO-MARTINEZ,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 1:17-CR-475-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Valentin Jasso-

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-41228    Document: 00514514714   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/15/2018

                               No. 17-41228

Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jasso-Martinez has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review.

      Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2