Court Opinion

ID: 584759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:18:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:27.874694
License: Public Domain

966 F.2d 1445
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Benjamin Chevis CUMBER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6343.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 1, 1992Decided:  June 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.  W. Earl Britt, District Judge.  (CR-88-26-7-BR, CA-91-105-5-BR)
Benjamin Chevis Cumber, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Daniel Boyce, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Benjamin Chevis Cumber appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Cumber, No. CR-88-26-7-BR, CA-91-105-5BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED