Court Opinion

ID: 1006125
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:06:38.025425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:25.873814
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7232

MARVIN BEEACHIE GARNER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
01-517-CCB)

Submitted:   December 12, 2001         Decided:     December 20, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Beeachie Garner, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Marvin Beeachie Garner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001), construed by the district court as being

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001).    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Garner v. Maryland, No. CA-01-517-CCB (D. Md. July 6,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2