Court Opinion

ID: 3320839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:38:26.951804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:02.464306
License: Public Domain

In my opinion, the evidence of the appearance of the defect at the time of the accident was entirely inadequate to justify an inference of constructive notice. There was no other *Page 479 
evidence. The case resembles Burgess v. Plainville,101 Conn. 68, 72, 124 A. 829, Burlant v. Hartford,111 Conn. 36, 149 A. 132, and Anderson v. Bridgeport,111 Conn. 681, 151 A. 188, rather than Linn v. Hartford,135 Conn. 469, 66 A.2d 115. I think there was no error.
In this opinion CORNELL, J., concurred.