Court Opinion

ID: 3163234
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-16 19:03:08.383978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:43.296347
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                          OF FLORIDA

                                          SECOND DISTRICT

J-H HOME MORTGAGE RESCUE,        )
LLC, as trustee of the 4661 Carson
                                 )
Land Trust dated 11/30/90,       )
                                 )
           Appellant,            )
                                 )
v.                               )             Case No. 2D14-3398
                                 )
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE        )
ASSOCIATION,                     )
                                 )
           Appellee.             )
________________________________ )

Opinion filed December 16, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Pinellas County; Lorraine Kelly, Acting
Circuit Judge.

Timothy W. Weber of Weber, Crabb &
Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Elizabeth T. Frau of Ronald R. Wolfe &
Associates, P.L., Tampa, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

              J-H Home Mortgage Rescue, LLC, appeals a final judgment of foreclosure

in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). We reverse because

the record lacked competent, substantial evidence to show that Fannie Mae was

entitled to enforce the note.
              In 2011, SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., filed a foreclosure complaint and

alleged that Fannie Mae was the owner of the note but that SunTrust was the servicer

and holder of the note. In the original note and mortgage, SunTrust was identified as

the lender. The note contained a blank indorsement, but it was stamped "VOID."

SunTrust's complaint and amended complaint were dismissed. In the second-amended

complaint, SunTrust was alleged to have been the former servicer and Fannie Mae was

alleged to be the real party in interest.

              At trial, testimony was presented by a representative of the new servicer,

Seterus, Inc. The witness testified that Fannie Mae acquired the loan in October 2007.

He based his testimony simply on a screen shot taken from his company's computer

system. This image reflected two different loan numbers—one attributed to Fannie Mae

and one attributed to Seterus, the current servicer. There was no assignment, no

allonge, nor any other evidence that Fannie Mae had standing.

              "A plaintiff who is not the original lender may establish standing to

foreclose a mortgage loan by submitting a note with a blank or special indorsement, an

assignment of the note, or an affidavit otherwise proving the plaintiff's status as the

holder of the note." May v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 150 So. 3d 247, 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)

(quoting Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So. 3d 308, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)).

There was no indorsement or assignment, in blank or to Fannie Mae, and the screen

shot was not competent, substantial evidence of its acquisition.

              Reversed.

CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

                                            -2-