Court Opinion

ID: 9786799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 00:02:53.107244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:36:48.767059
License: Public Domain

Maupin, J.,
concurring:
I agree that the evidence in this case should be suppressed for the reasons stated by Leavitt, J., in his majority opinion. I write separately to note that the detention in this case, having been illegally effected, was entirely different from that described in State v. Lisenbee, 116 Nev. 1124, 13 P.3d 947 (2000) (Maupin, J., concurring). I further note that whether Proferes’ resistance to the detention was itself legal or illegal, see Batson v. State, 113 Nev. 669, 676 n.3, 941 P.2d 478, 480 n.3 (1997), is not determinative *1143of whether the fruits of the improper detention and interrogation should be suppressed.