Court Opinion

ID: 5621571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:37:54.693024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:26.615337
License: Public Domain

Luke, J.
The court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of burglary; but since the verdict was demanded by the evidence, such error, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, will not require a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Frank T. G-rizzard, H. F. Sharp, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, E. A. Stephens, contra.