Court Opinion

ID: 9933257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:41:48.306088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:08:43.259286
License: Public Domain

The excessiveness of the verdict was not an issue presented to this Court for review. *Page 226 
If it had been, I would have voted to remand for reconsideration of the remittitur issue in compliance with the standards set forth in Hammond v. City of Gadsden,493 So.2d 1374 (Ala. 1986); Harmon v. Motors Insurance Corp.,493 So.2d 1370 (Ala. 1986); Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Casualty InsuranceCo. v. Griffin, 493 So.2d 1379 (Ala. 1986) (on rehearing);Reinhardt Motors, Inc. v. Boston [Ms. October 3, 1986] (Ala. 1986).