Court Opinion

ID: 9407829
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-10 15:01:47.228276+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:40.399488
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-1357
                         ___________________________

                             United States of America,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                           v.

                              Jesus R. Sanchez-Meza,

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                        ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                     for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
                                 ____________

                             Submitted: June 21, 2023
                               Filed: July 10, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Jesus Sanchez-Meza appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
pleaded guilty to a drug offense pursuant to a binding plea agreement that contained

      1
      The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that enforcing the appeal waiver
would result in a miscarriage of justice, and that the sentence was unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and
applicable to the issues raised in this appeal, and that no miscarriage of justice would
result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92
(8th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

       We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope
of the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                       ______________________________

                                          -2-