Court Opinion

ID: 4267469
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-24 00:02:35.17895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:08.661027
License: Public Domain

Heddon v. Town of Hinesburg, No. S0213-03 CnC (Norton, J., Sept. 28,
2004)

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been
reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the
accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is
not guaranteed.]

STATE OF VERMONT                                    SUPERIOR COURT
Chittenden County, ss.:                         Docket No.S0213-03 CnC

HEDDEN

v.

TOWN OF HINESBURG

                            Findings of Fact

       Case came forward on the merits on September 10, 2004. Evidence
disclosed the following facts adopted by the court.

       Robert Hedden appeals the January 21, 2003 Hinesburg
Selectboard’s decision to re-classify Boutin Road South from a Class 3 to
Class 4 road. Boutin Road South in Hinesburg is also known as T.H. 13. It
was first classified as a town road in 1974. Hedden owns a 10.1-acre
parcel, home, and attached garage, with outbuildings. Hedden’s is the only
residence served by Boutin Road South; his address is 526 O’Neil Road,
which runs perpendicular to Boutin Road South.

       Hedden purchased his home on October 17, 2002, believing his
home would be serviced by a Class 3 town highway, which would be
plowed in the winter, as it had since Tom Myers moved there in 1973.
Tom Myers and his wife had purchased the lot on Boutin Road South in
1973, and they had made an agreement with the Town of Hinesburg to
improve the road. During the 29 years that Myers owned the property, no
one from the Town spoke to him about reclassification, and he did not warn
Hedden about the possibility. Thirteen days after the closing, Hedden
received notice from the town that the Selectboard was going to hold a
hearing on whether to continue plowing his road. The notice was dated
October 30, 2002.

        Myers testified that when he bought the property in 1973, the road
had been a “lane” used by his farmer-grantor, and historically was an old
stagecoach road. When Myers was building his house at the top of a steep
hill, he met with Ted Palmer, Hinesburg Road Commissioner. They agreed
to have Myers remove trees, blast off the crown of the hill, and install a
drain, while the town graded and filled in the road. Eventually, the road
was a traveled way, 15–20 feet wide. Myers removed more trees near his
house so the town would have a turn-around for the plows; all was graveled
and hard packed.

      Since 1973, the town plows the road every year. If there was a
washout, Myers and the town would grade again. The town’s agreement to
maintain and plow was never reduced to writing.
        Prior to selling to Robert Hedden, Myers learned from Rocky Martin
that the town was “thinking of discontinuing some services,” but Myers
did not “really discuss” it with Hedden. He did tell Hedden of the
gentleman’s agreement with the town for winter maintenance and
regrading.
        At sale, Boutin Road South ran 0.08 miles from O’Neil Road to the
Myers’s house, the only home on the road. Myers said it has become a
much better road in recent years, smooth enough for a motorcycle.

       Hedden testified that he had no reason to suspect the town was going
to change Boutin Road South’s classification from Class 3 to Class 4. The
town continues to plow and grade in the summer at plaintiff’s request since
the reclassification and while the case is on appeal. Hedden testified that if
the Class 3 status is given up, then he would prefer the road be discontinued
so he could limit any traffic on the road and maintain it himself.

       Martin testified that Boutin Road South is a short, gravel road off
O’Neil, about 500 feet long and 12–14 feet in width. It is flat at first and
then steeply goes up to the Hedden home. He stated that the road is not up
to town standards, which would require widening it to 18 feet, building
ditches on either side, and adding a greater depth of packing material.

        Maintenance is currently twofold, grade twice in summer and plow
and sand in winter. Martin described this work as a difficult because it is a
small section of road where sand-laden trucks can not get up the hill and
had become completely stuck on two occasions. Such incidents, Martin
felt, create a drain on crew and equipment and disrupt services to main
roads. The town has four vehicles for snow removal, three plows and one,
one-ton pickup. When the town needs to rescue a stranded truck, one-half
of the fleet is involved and all snow removal is “thrown off.” Martin
testified that this problem also presented a threat to staff and vehicles. He
believes that the slope and width would require further blasting and fill to
bring up to standard.

       In its decision to re-classify, the Selectboard found that the roads
discontinued do “not meet Hinesburg Road Standards. In addition, the
narrowness of and the lack of turn-arounds on these roads have caused
accidents in the past and pose a continuing safety hazard to Town
employees, property, and the public.” The reference to “accidents” did not
apply to Boutin Road South, but rather to the other two road segments
discontinued at the same time. Boutin Road South has a turn-around at its
end.

       The board also found that, since these roads “may provide future
connections for recreational corridors, discontinuance of the [road
segments] is not prudent.” This was also a reference to other road segments
discontinued in January 2003 and not Boutin Road South.

      Hedden appealed the decision of the Selectboard to the Superior
Court pursuant to V.R.C.P. 75, the appellate choice of those objecting to
board decisions, which are not appealable by statute.

                             Conclusions of Law

        The Town of Hinesburg’s authority to reclassify roads comes from
statute. 19 V.S.A. §§ 302, 303, 708. Accordingly, the Hinesburg
Selectboard may initiate proceedings and reclassify a highway based on the
criteria that the change is in the public good, there is a necessity, and it is a
convenience of the inhabitants of the town. 19 V.S.A. § 710. Here the
Town Selectboard followed the statutory procedures and made findings that
the reclassification was required by each of the three criteria.

       The court’s review of this decision on appeal is guided by the same
standards. Hansen v. Town of Charleston, 157 Vt. 329, 332, 335–36
(1991). This review is an appellate level review and is not bound by
“technical rules” but exercised in a practical manner. Id. at 335–36.
       In this case, the Selectboard’s findings are echoed by the findings of
this court. Maintaining the road at a Class 3 status was shown to be
difficult and time-consuming. It posed a safety risk to the road crew and
their equipment. This in turn led to delays in plowing the busier roads,
therein creating a larger threat to public safety. Functionally, this road is a
driveway to the Hedden’s home, and the expenditure of resources outstrips
the number of people served by the Town’s efforts. We conclude that the
Town’s decision meets the three criteria in that it benefits everyone in the
Town, even, albeit to a lesser extent, Hedden as a member of the
community.

       This appeal also lacks any evidence that the Town’s decision was
arbitrary and discriminatory. Id. at 335. As an alternative ground to
denying a reclassification, the court may reverse the Selectboard if it has
applied its power in an uneven manner, that singles out a road or roads.
See Catlin v. Town of Hartland, 138 Vt. 1, 2 (1979). Here, the
reclassification of Boutin Road South was one of three roads reclassified to
reduce the town’s expenses and preserve their resources from potential
harm. There is no evidence that the road was singled out or that Hedden
was targeted by the Town’s decision.

       Finally, Hedden urges the court to modify the Town’s
reclassification to downgrade the road into a private way that he may
control the in-flow of traffic, especially ATVs and snowmachines, onto the
road. This argument proposed by appellant has an air of equity, but this
belies the true nature of the reclassification. By downgrading Boutin Road
South, the Town does not strip Hedden of any personally held property
right derived as an abutting landowner. Perrin v. Town of Berlin, 138 Vt.
306, 307 (1980). Rather, the right affected is a public right held in common
by all taxpayers and citizens. Therefore, Hedden is not losing any right that
equity can repair. Certainly, he is suffering a certain loss of convenience,
having the town regularly re-grade and plow the essentially private road to
his house. Yet, this was a collateral benefit, much in the way that a
homeowner might benefit from living next door to a fire station. If the
Selectboard decides to move the fire station to the other side of town, this
neighbor suffers a loss of convenience, but it is not a loss to which there is
a remedy at law or equity.

       While Hedden has demonstrated that some of the Town’s reasons for
continuing the downgraded roads as Class 4 do not apply to Boutin Road
South, he has not established a compelling reason why the Town should be
forced to forfeit its interest in Boutin South Road as a public way. The
benefits of such a result are clear to Hedden, but it is not clear what public
good, necessity, or convenience would be served by the complete closing of
this public way.

       Mr. Hedden’s argument that the road is of no benefit to the Town is
not supported by the evidence; his argument is that the road is of such little
value to the Town and of such great value to him that it should be made a
private way. The criteria, however, is not what is in Mr. Hedden’s interest
but the public’s good, necessity, and convenience. In this case there was no
proof that Boutin Road South as a Class 4 road is of no use to the Town or
that Hedden’s individual concerns outweigh the public good. Even if there
is no articulate reason for keeping Boutin Road South, there is no reason to
privatize it either. As Ambrose Bierce argued against suicide: “What’s not
worth having cannot be worth taking,” the same can be said for Boutin
Road South.

        More importantly, neither the record nor the testimony was clear that
this argument was made to the Selectboard during the original hearing. It is
therefore, more in line with 19 V.S.A. § 708, which allows citizens to
petition for reclassification, to affirm the Selectboard’s reclassification and
leave it open for Hedden to petition the Town to further reclassify the road.
This will allow the Town to study the issue and make its own conclusions
before granting or denying the petiton. The Town may even decide to sell
Hedden their easement altogether. Any way is superior to a decision from
the court that does not have evidence to evaluate how a further re-
classification would impact the Town’s greater good.

                                 Order
      Based on the foregoing, the court affirms the reclassification of
Boutin Road South and rejects Robert Hedden’s appeal.

       Dated at Burlington, Vermont________________, 2004.

_________________________                                                         ____________
Assistant Judge                                                                   Judge