Court Opinion

ID: 6545806
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:19:28.205008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:57.797946
License: Public Domain

Battle, J. On the 21st day of August, 1903, Jane Cantwell purchased a ticket of the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad Company for transportation over its road from Mansfield in Arkansas to Holdenville in the Indian Territory. She was on the depot platform with her three children, ready to take the train when it arrived. It remained from five to ten minutes. She succeeded in getting the eldest child, a little girl, on the train, when it moved out and left her and the other two children at the depot. Upon discovering the little girl on board, the trainmen stopped about one or two hundred yards from the depot and put her off. They made no effort to run the train back to the depot. To have done so, it would have been necessary to send a brakeman back about a half mile with a flag to protect against collisions and delayed the train until it would have missed connections with other trains. Mrs. Cantwell made no effort and showed no disposition to get to the train when it stopped, and it moved on. The railway company filed an offer in court to confess judgment in favor of Mrs. Cantwell for the sum of ten dollars, which exceeded her actual damages, and she refused to accept it. The jury in the case returned a verdict in her favor for $150, and in it included exemplary damages to which she is not entitled; for the evidence shows that the servants and employees of the railroad company were guilty of nothing more than negligence; and “negligence, however gross, will not justify a verdict for exemplary damages, unless the negligent party is guilty of willfulness, wantonness, or conscious indifference to consequences from which malice will be inferred.” Railway v. Hall, 53 Ark. 7; St. Louis, I. M. & So. Railway Co. v. Wilson, 70 Ark. 136; Arkansas & Louisiana Ry. Co. v. Stroude, 77 Ark. 109. If Mrs.’ Cantwell will remit $140, her judgment will be affirmed as to $10; otherwise the judgment will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded for a new trial. Him,, C. J., did not participate.