Court Opinion

ID: 996481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:51:40.584576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:57.638589
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6336

FLETCHER LEWIS FARRAR,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; TOM C. MARTIN,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-97-313-2)

Submitted:   September 22, 1998           Decided:   October 7, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fletcher Lewis Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Fletcher Lewis Farrar appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Farrar v. North Carolina Attorney General, No.

CA-97-313-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2