Court Opinion

ID: 7796681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-01 15:10:37.596677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:30.164436
License: Public Domain

81036: Case View
	
	
	
	
	
		

	
	
	
	

	
		
	
	
	
     

	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	

	
	
	 
	

	

Nevada
Appellate Courts

Appellate Case Management System

C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts

			
			
				
				
					Case Search
				
			
				
				
					Participant Search
				
			
			
		

Cases

							
								Case Search
							
						

							
								Participant Search
							
						

22-18412: This document is currently unavailable. If you need a copy of this document, please contact Clerk's Office at (775)684-1600.	

Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.Only filed documents can be viewed.  Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 81036

Short Caption:CITY OF BOULDER CITY VS. BFE, LLCCourt:Supreme Court

Related Case(s):81718

Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A805287Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other

Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed

Replacement:Panel Assigned:
					En Banc
					

To SP/Judge:04/23/2020 / Tanksley, ThomasSP Status:Completed

Oral Argument:02/07/2022 at 1:30 PMOral Argument Location:Las Vegas

Submission Date:02/07/2022How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+
						Party Information
					

RoleParty NameRepresented By

AppellantBoulder City Fire DepartmentCynthia Lynn Alexander
							(Dickinson Wright PLLC)
						Steven L. Morris
							(Boulder City Attorney)
						Anjali D. Webster
							(Dickinson Wright PLLC)
						

AppellantCity of Boulder CityCynthia Lynn Alexander
							(Dickinson Wright PLLC)
						Steven L. Morris
							(Boulder City Attorney)
						Anjali D. Webster
							(Dickinson Wright PLLC)
						

RespondentBFE, LLCMatthew T. Dushoff
							(Saltzman Mugan Dushoff)
						Jonathan W. Fountain
							(Former)
						
							(Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC)
						William A. Gonzales, II
							(Saltzman Mugan Dushoff)
						Steven E. Kish
							(Former)
						
							(Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC)
						Ryan T. O'Malley
							(Former)
						
							(Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC)
						Cami M. Perkins
							(Former)
						
							(Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC)
						Jordan D. Wolff
							(Saltzman Mugan Dushoff)
						

Docket Entries

DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document

04/21/2020Filing FeeAppeal Filing Fee Waived.  State/County/Municipality. (SC)

04/21/2020Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) (SC)20-15049

04/21/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program.  Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. (SC)20-15051

04/23/2020Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program.  Settlement Judge: Thomas J. Tanksley. (SC)20-15375

05/11/2020Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. (SC)20-17887

05/12/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Provide Proof of Service on Settlement Judge. (SC)20-18019

05/18/2020Notice/IncomingFiled Appellant's Proof of Service to Settlement Judge. (SC)20-18930

05/27/2020Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Other. The premediation conference is continued because SJ has had several communications with each side, but it is a dynamic situation still in early stages of litigation and dispute. Request to June 22, 2020, for ECA. (SC).20-20013

06/22/2020Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Other. The premediation conference is continued because SJ has had mutliple conversations with counsel and this remains a dynamic situation with procedurally young dispute still with complexities. SJ will postpone ECA until mid-August, unless updates from counsel compel otherwise. (SC)20-23033

07/08/2020Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Association of Counsel. Cynthia L. Alexander for Appellants. (SC)20-25160

07/08/2020Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Provide Proof of Service on Settlement Judge (Notice of Association of Counsel). (SC)20-25252

07/15/2020Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service (Notice of Association of Counsel served on settlement judge). (SC).20-26030

09/04/2020Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Other. The premediation conference is continued as the settlement judge will give another month to see if case is appropriate. (SC)20-32707

09/17/2020Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Other. The premediation conference is continued.  Due to dynamic events related to the underlying dispute and/or the parties, the Settlement Judge requests at least until October 20, 2020 for further input and evaluation. Case Nos. 81036/81718. (SC)20-34357

10/17/2020Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Other. Settlement Judge requests maximum extension to file final report as situation is and has been dynamic. Case Nos. 81036/81718. (SC).20-38202

10/20/2020Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Extension of Time for Status Report. The time for filing a Final Settlement Conference Status Report is extended to January 18, 2021.  Case Nos. 81036/81718. (SC)20-38329

01/19/2021Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Not Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is not appropriate for mediation. Case Nos. 81036/81718.  (SC).21-01574

01/21/2021Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. This appeal is removed from the settlement program.  Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 90 days opening brief.  (SC)21-01767

02/04/2021Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 3/4/20.  To Court Reporter: Peggy Isom. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 2/4/21) (SC)

02/04/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Deficient Transcript Request. (SC)21-03466

02/05/2021Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 3/4/20. To Court Reporter: Peggy Isom. (SC)21-03537

02/05/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Appellants' Notice of Appearance for Anjali D. Webster. (SC)21-03567

02/23/2021TranscriptFiled Notice from Court Reporter. Peggy Isom stating that the requested transcripts were delivered.  Dates of transcripts: 03/04/20. (SC)21-05302

03/29/2021Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's opening brief and appendix due: May 5, 2021. (SC)21-08834

04/07/2021Transcript RequestFiled an Additional Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 4/9/20. To Court Reporter: Peggy Isom. (SC)21-10029

05/05/2021BriefFiled Appellants' Opening Brief. (SC)21-12853

05/05/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 1. (SC)21-12856

05/05/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 2. (SC)21-12857

05/05/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 3. (SC)21-12860

05/05/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 4. (SC)21-12861

06/03/2021MotionFiled Stipulation Extending Time for Respondent's Answering Brief. (SC)21-15858

06/03/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved.  Respondent's Answering Brief due: July 6, 2021. (SC)21-15949

07/02/2021MotionFiled Stipulation Extending Time for Respondent's Answering Brief. (SC)21-19165

07/16/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order.  Respondent's Answering Brief due:  August 4, 2021.  (SC)21-20619

08/04/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Motion for Judicial Notice, for Order to Show Cause Why Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed as Moot, and For Attorneys' Fees. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 8/5/21) (SC)

08/04/2021BriefFiled Respondent's Answering Brief. (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 8/5/21)(SC)

08/05/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Of Rejection - No Notice Of Appearance for Jonathan W. Fountain. (SC)21-22712

08/05/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance of Jonathan W. Fountain (Jonathan W. Fountain of the law firm Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent BFE, LLC.). (SC)21-22738

08/05/2021Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance of Steven E. Kish III (Steven K. Kish III, of the law firm Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC, hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent BFE, LLC.) (SC)21-22743

08/05/2021MotionFiled Respondent BFE, LLC's Motion for Judicial Notice, for Order to Show Cause Why Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed as Moot, and for Attorneys' Fees. (SC)21-22744

08/05/2021BriefFiled Respondent's Answering Brief. (SC)21-22745

08/09/2021Order/Clerk'sFiled Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellants' response to Motion for Judicial Notice, for Order to Show Cause Why Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed as Moot, and for Attorneys' Fees due: August 26, 2021. (SC)21-23149

08/26/2021MotionFiled Stipulation Extending Time for Appellant's Reply Brief (First Request). (SC)21-24845

08/26/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved.  Appellants' Reply Brief due: October 7, 2021. (SC)21-24848

08/26/2021MotionFiled Appellant's Response to Respondent BFE, LLC's Motion for Judicial Notice, for Order to Show Cause Why Appeal Should Not be Dismissed as Moot, and for Attorneys' Fees. (SC)21-24858

09/02/2021MotionFiled Respondent's Reply in Support of Motion for Judicial Notice, for Order to Show Cause, and for Attorneys' Fees. (SC)21-25668

10/04/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondent has filed a motion for judicial notice, an order directing appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot, and attorney fees.  Appellants oppose the motion and respondent has filed a reply. Having considered the documents before this court, this court concludes that the motion is best resolved in conjunction with the disposition of this appeal.  Accordingly, this court defers ruling on the motion.  (SC)21-28363

10/07/2021BriefFiled Appellants' Reply Brief. (SC)21-28824

11/02/2021Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening. (SC)

01/10/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument.  Oral argument is scheduled for February 7, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in Las Vegas.  Argument shall be limited to 30 minutes.  (SC)22-00904

01/24/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. (SC)22-02436

02/07/2022Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the Court En Banc. (SC).

03/22/2022Notice/IncomingFiled Respondent's Substitution of Attorneys from Howard & Howard Attorneys to Matthew T. Dushoff, Jordan D. Wolff, and William A. Gonzales of the Law Firm Saltzman Mugan Dushoff. (SC)22-08990

03/25/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Regarding Counsel.  The clerk shall add Matthew T. Dushoff, Jordan D. Wolff, and William A. Gonzalez of Saltzman Mugan Dushoff  as counsel of record for respondent and remove Cami M. Perkins, Jonathan W. Fountain, and Steven E. Kish of Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC.  (SC)22-09338

06/09/2022Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Reversal. "ORDER the judgement of the district court REVERSED." EN BANC. (SC)22-18412

07/05/2022RemittiturIssued Remittitur.  (SC)22-20961

07/05/2022Case Status UpdateRemittitur Issued/Case Closed.  (SC)

Combined Case View