Court Opinion

ID: 9662069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:58:43.620667+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:36.592210
License: Public Domain

*373RUDOLPH, J.,
(dissenting). The jury could reasonably find that when plaintiff discovered it could not obtain the three locations for billboards as provided in the written contract and so informed the defendant that the written contract was then abandoned. It was not until several weeks after this discovery that defendant and plaintiff’s representative made the trips into the country and finally agreed upon locations for billboards. At this time nothing was said about the written contract or the period of time for payments. Defendant testified that these locations were not substitute locations for those in the written contract. Whether the oral agreement was for a substitution of the locations provided in the written contract or a new agreement between the parties, I believe was a question for the jury.