Court Opinion

ID: 5651204
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 23:06:05.176012+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:35.537842
License: Public Domain

BARNARD, P. J.
From the certificate of the county clerk on file herein it appears that notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 1933; that no bill of exceptions has been filed under section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no transcript has been filed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no request for a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed; that no additional time in which to prepare and serve a bill of exceptions has been allowed; that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or a transcript is pending in the trial court; and that the time within which a record might be prepared under either method has expired. Respondents’ motion to dismiss should, therefore, be granted (General Motors etc. Co. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981] ; Union Trust Co. of San Diego v. Novotny, 125 Cal. App. 417 [13 Pac. (2d) 974]).
The appeal is dismissed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.