Court Opinion

ID: 5629440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 05:13:42.01223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:44.677160
License: Public Domain

Nichols, J.
The evidence introduced on the trial of the case did not support the defendant’s plea of no consideration, and therefore, the trial court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold, 52 Ga. App. 304 (183 S. E. 104); Hall v. Beavers, 78 Ga. App. 722 (2) (51 S. E. 2d 879); Ray v. Marett, 84 Ga. App. 86 (65 S. E. 2d 646).

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.