Court Opinion

ID: 8043821
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:46:36.779646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:25.045151
License: Public Domain

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we *419need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).
Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.