Court Opinion

ID: 9608956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 03:20:07.57674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:28.692220
License: Public Domain

McCOMB, Concurring and Dissenting.
I would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by Mr. Presiding Justice Kaufman in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in People v. Dewberry (Cal.App.), 327 P. 2d 616. *561damaged when received by plaintiff. Some could not be used because they were unsuitable; for example, 22 doors shipped as replacement-bathroom doors were equipped with chimes and letter drops. Aluminum Products shipped a total of 2,604 doors before enough suitable doors were obtained, and plaintiff was engaged in handling, storing, repairing, removing and installing doors for over a year.