Court Opinion

ID: 5662348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 01:08:21.863441+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:05.076002
License: Public Domain

WALLIN, J., Concurring.
This opinion presents the second opportunity for our court to review the adequacy of a Miranda warning in *665light of United States v. Noti (9th Cir. 1984) 731 F.2d 610 [77 A.L.R.Fed. 111]. In the first case I reluctantly agreed to follow Noti and concurred in a result holding a warning similar to the one given to Valdivia was insufficient. I now note my previous reluctance to accept Noti mirrors the view of Justice Crosby. Since the Supreme Court, without explanation, decertified our prior opinion which followed Noti, I assume my original reluctance is shared by others and concur in affirming this judgment.