Court Opinion

ID: 4840987
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-23 10:14:53.514681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:35.909089
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging, if appropriate, that he does not qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender and/or as a prison release reoffen-der. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001); Hampton v. State, 941 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

May, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.