Court Opinion

ID: 5996086
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:28:49.186079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:05.493814
License: Public Domain

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered December 6, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 31h to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The trial court properly declined to charge assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree, there being no reasonable view of the evidence that the braided belt used to pummel the victim was not a dangerous instrument within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (13) (see, People v Carter, 53 NY2d 113; People v Rollins, 120 AD2d 896, Iv denied 68 NY2d 773) or that defendant did not use the belt in repeatedly striking the victim.
Defendant’s objection to the relevance of the box cutter was *238insufficient to preserve his appellate claim that its prejudicial effect outweighed its probative value (see, People v Pettigrew, 208 AD2d 365, Iv denied 85 NY2d 912), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, we find no error since there was no argument that this was the same box cutter used in the attack and in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s participation in the assault (see, People v Sims, 209 AD2d 192, Iv denied 84 NY2d 1015). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.