Court Opinion

ID: 3216173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-22 21:01:17.294846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:40.099673
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 22 2016

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ,                         No. 14-73134

               Petitioner,                       Agency No. A095-272-049

 v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

               Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before:        BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

      Armando Hernandez-Lopez, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discretion the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

      The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Lopez’s motion,

where he failed to establish that the evidence submitted was previously

unavailable. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (requirements for motion to reopen).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

                                         2                                  14-73134