Court Opinion

ID: 1026772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:11:47.314918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:18.692548
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Nathan Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or deferment of his fine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Young,
  
  No. 7:04-cr-00050-F-l (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.