Court Opinion

ID: 2885762
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 18:38:04.274969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:33.210033
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-01-0235-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 29, 2001

______________________________

CAROLYN BELL THOMAS, APPELLANT

V.

BILL NEAL, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 46
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF SHERMAN COUNTY;

NO. 9395; HONORABLE LESLIE THOMAS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellee Bill Neal has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, asserting we have no jurisdiction because appellant failed to perfect her appeal within the time prescribed by the Rules of Appellate Procedure.  We grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

The judgment at issue was rendered January 4, 2001.  Appellant timely filed a motion to set aside that judgment on January 19, 2001.  On May 31, 2001, appellant filed a notice of appeal designating it a restricted appeal pursuant to appellate Rules 25.1(d)(7) and 26.1(c).   However, by virtue of Rule 30, restricted appeals are only available to parties who did not participate at trial 
and
 did not timely file a post-judgment motion.  Here, appellant’s timely January 19 motion to set aside the judgment precludes her right to a restricted appeal.  
Laboratory Corp. v. Mid-Town Surgical Ctr.
, 16 S.W.3d 527, 528 (Tex.App.–Dallas 2000, no pet. h.).  Appellant’s May 31 notice of appeal was also untimely for perfecting an ordinary appeal because it was filed beyond the 90-day period set by Rule 26.1(a).  

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b).  Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we are without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.  Accordingly, we must, and hereby do, dismiss this appeal.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.