Court Opinion

ID: 3947692
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:10:15.581894+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:31.501861
License: Public Domain

Appellant was originally charged with the theft of property of the value of $50 — consisting of two $20 bills and one $10 bill. A conviction resulted, and upon appeal the judgment was reversed, upon the theory that the facts did not show him to be a principal. He was then indicted as an accomplice. The court fixed his bond at $750. Being unable to give this, he resorted to habeas corpus proceedings to reduce the bond. Upon the hearing, the State introduced the indictment. Appellant offered evidence which showed his poverty, a lack of friends to go on his bond, the *Page 300 
fact that he was a stranger in that county, and his utter inability to give bond in the sum fixed by the court. There was no evidence offered in regard to the facts of the alleged crime. It is an admitted fact, that the State continued the case at the last term of the District Court of Bowie County. We are of opinion that the court erred in not reducing the bond; and we now fix his bond at the sum of $400, upon the giving of which in the terms of the law, to be approved by the sheriff of Bowie County, appellant will be released from custody.
Released on bond.