Court Opinion

ID: 4550317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-07-22 20:00:31.364449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:04:43.675169
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUL 22 2020
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMIAH JAMES PETLIG,                          No. 19-35672

                Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00721-MJP

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
C. HARRAWAY, Officer,

                Defendant-Appellee,

and

SCOTT CARTER-ELDRED; et al.,

                Defendants.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Western District of Washington
                   Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted July 14, 2020**

Before:      CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

      Washington state prisoner Jeremiah James Petlig appeals pro se from the

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

inadequate medical care while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Gordon v. County of Orange, 888
F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018), and we affirm.

      The district court properly granted summary judgment because Petlig failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Harraway’s response to

Petlig’s request for immediate medical attention was objectively unreasonable. See

Gordon, 888 F.3d at 1124-25 (setting forth objective deliberate indifference

standard for Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims brought by

pretrial detainees).

      AFFIRMED.

                                         2                                     19-35672