Court Opinion

ID: 8429367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 05:23:04.273581+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:34.674770
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Robert Allen Bane appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bane v. Pearson, No. CA-03-295-1-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 11, 2004). We grant Bane’s unopposed motion to dismiss Ellis as a party to this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED