Court Opinion

ID: 3152039
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-11-04 20:00:57.874424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:26.644099
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 15-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

ERNEST MELVIN TUCKER, a/k/a Sonny Tucker,

                Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1)

Submitted:   October 30, 2015             Decided:   November 4, 2015

Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Melvin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

     Ernest   Melvin   Tucker   appeals   the   district   court’s   order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.   United States v. Tucker, No. 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-

1 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 7, 2015).          We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                   2