Court Opinion

ID: 9744040
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 21:52:29.688373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:46.330934
License: Public Domain

ROBERTSON, Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the reason that I believe a genuine issue of material fact exists and that summary judgment is not appropriate.
The doctrines of continuing wrong and fraudulent concealment are extremely fact sensitive in my opinion. Montgomery v. Crum (1928), 199 Ind. 660, 161 N.E. 251 clearly held that the question of a continuing wrong is one for the jury. Frady v. *332Hedgcock (1986), Ind.App., 497 N.E.2d 620, which relies upon the authority in Montgomery, held that summary judgment was not proper because the trial court did not liberally construe the facts in favor of the nonmoving party. I am of the opinion the same thing has occurred in this case.
I would reverse the trial court’s granting of summary judgment.