Court Opinion

ID: 9898975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-15 17:05:09.55161+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:21.626220
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                      Opinion filed November 15, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                              No. 3D23-640
                       Lower Tribunal No. 21-89 CC
                          ________________

                            Dawn E. Dubois,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                      The Affiliati Network, Inc.,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Luis Perez-
Medina, Judge.

     Dawn E. Dubois, in proper person.

    Chane Socarras, PLLC, and Ruben E. Socarras (Boca Raton); The
Law Office of Warren B. Kwavnick, PLLC, and Warren B. Kwavnick
(Pembroke Pines), for appellee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

     GORDO, J.
      Dawn E. Dubois appeals a final judgment entered after a non-jury trial

in favor of The Affiliati Network, Inc. and an order granting entitlement of

attorney’s fees.

      As to the final judgment on appeal, we have jurisdiction pursuant to

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1)(A) and we affirm the final

judgment in all respects. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377

So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the

appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as

to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence

or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can

an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived

the law as to require reversal.”); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. as

Tr., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there is no record of the

testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of

the record has not been prepared . . . a judgment which is not fundamentally

erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”).

      As to that portion of the appeal related to entitlement of attorney’s fees,

we dismiss. See Low Key Ltd., Inc. v. Annesser, 128 So. 3d 35, 36 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2012) (“As to the portion of the final judgment determining that the

parties are entitled to attorney’s fees and costs but reserving jurisdiction to

                                       2
set the amount of the fees, we dismiss the appeal . . . as a non-final

determination not yet ripe for appellate review.”).

      Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

                                       3