Court Opinion

ID: 4098869
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-16 20:11:28.935073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:01.147972
License: Public Domain

People v Suruy (2016 NY Slip Op 07685)

People v Suruy

2016 NY Slip Op 07685

Decided on November 16, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 16, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
RUTH C. BALKIN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2015-03267
 (Ind. No. 2956-13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vNelson Estuardo Chamale Suruy, appellant.

Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), imposed January 14, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).
ENG, P.J., DICKERSON, BALKIN, HINDS-RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court