Court Opinion

ID: 9299804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:06:19.657536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:38.409897
License: Public Domain

SAWYER, Circuit Judge.
There can be no doubt that the services rendered by the steam-tug Astoria and her crew, out of which this case arose, was a salvage service. Besides the respondents’ claim of $5000 was presented and allowed as for a salvage service, and I do not think they can now be heard to deny the service to be of this character.
The principal question discussed at the hearing of the appeal was, whether the $5000 was claimed and allowed for the entire salvage service, including the services of the crew, or only for the portion of the service to which the owners of the steam-tug were entitled. The crew had not authorized the owners to put in any claim on their behalf, nor had they at the time themselves made any formal claim. It does not even appear that they were aware that the own ere contemplated making a claim for salvage. The owners did, however, present a claim against the vessel saved, in the language, “To steam-tug Astoria and owners, Dr., to salvage services, etc., $5000,” which was allowed. There was a general and particular average, the vessel saved and the cargo contributing. I am satisfied, under the circumstances shown, that this claim covered the entire salvage service. It must have been so understood by the owners of the vessel, and of the cargo liable to contribute. It was necessary that all demands should be known, in order that a proper adjustment should be made, while the vessel and property were in a condition to be made to contribute each its proper share. The owners of the vessel rendering salvage service have the general charge and oversight in such proceedings. They would be likely to see that all just claims are presented in order to protect themselves. And the bill presented in the name of the “steam-tug Astoria and owners, for salvage services,” must be construed as covering all adjuncts to the vessel contributing to the service under the directions of the officers in command. The vessel alone did not perform the service independent of the acts of the crew.
*1104It was the vessel with its machinery, manned with its crew, worked under the direction of its commander, all co-operating together as one efficient agency, that saved the brigantine and its cargo. And as there is nothing in the bill presented and allowed that indicates an intent or understanding of the parties interested to limit the claim to that part of the compensation due to the owners of the vessel as separate claimants, it must be held to cover the entire service.
Upon ascertaining that a claim for the salvage service of $5000 had been presented by the owners of the steam-tug Astoria, allowed and paid, the libellants being members of the crew acquiesced in the amount, and now claim their proper share. I think they are entitled to recover it
The only other questions are, as to whether the salvage money has been properly distributed by the district court. Upon this point, after a careful examination of the case, I cannot say that error is sufficiently apparent to my mind to justify disturbing the decree. There is no exact rule upon the subject applicable to all cases. The distribution must depend largely upon the sound discretion of the judge, guided by the circumstances of the case, and there is room for an honest difference of opinion. Upon the whole, I think the decree should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.