Court Opinion

ID: 999205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:22:14.448156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:29.801954
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHARLES RAY FRAZIER,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Bryson City.    Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-92-46-V, CA-96-11-2-V)

Submitted:   July 8, 1999                  Decided:    July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Ray Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Charles Ray Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Frazier, Nos. CR-92-46-V;

CA-96-11-2-V (W.D.N.C. June 30, 1998).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2