Court Opinion

ID: 8602592
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 23:54:33.200943+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:12.499634
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fulgham v. Parker, No. 2:05-cv-00401-JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2006 & entered Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED