Court Opinion

ID: 338577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:01:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:37:54.155166
License: Public Domain

540 F.2d 1022
Bob LOKEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.H. L. RICHARDSON, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-1256.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 9, 1976.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen. of Cal., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
ORDER
Before BROWNING, ELY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

1
Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case in light of Montanye v. Haymes, --- U.S. ----, 96 S. Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), and Meachum v. Fano, --- U.S. ----, 96 S. Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F.2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 96 S. Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d ---, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.