Court Opinion

ID: 183820
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-01-28 18:21:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:26:05.251237
License: Public Domain

Case: 09-51088 Document: 00511364601 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2011

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          January 28, 2011
                                     No. 09-51088
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

CAESAR HUMBERTO SALINAS,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 6:08-CR-4-7

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Caesar Humberto Salinas has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salinas has not filed a response. We do not
enforce the appeal waiver in light of the district court’s failure to admonish
Salinas of its consequences. Nevertheless, our independent review of the record
and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 09-51088 Document: 00511364601 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2011

                               No. 09-51088

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.

                                     2