Court Opinion

ID: 8650521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 20:25:17.156618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:30.971688
License: Public Domain

CRAWFORD, Judge
(concurring in the result):
I concur with the principal opinion’s conclusion that this was a valid gate search under Mil.R.Evid. 314(c), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, based on waiver of the requirements for a command authorization because of an “unfocused objection.” 37 MJ at 130 (Gierke, J., concurring). See Mil.R.Evid. 311(d)(2)(A) and (3). I believe we need not go any further in deciding this case.