Court Opinion

ID: 2691406
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:04:08.568273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:44.521170
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Murphy, 127 Ohio St. 3d 120, 2010-Ohio-5271.]

            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MURPHY, APPELLANT.
         [Cite as State v. Murphy, 127 Ohio St. 3d 120, 2010-Ohio-5271.]
Cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Rohrbaugh.
 (No. 2009-1309 — Submitted August 10, 2010 — Decided November 2, 2010.)
 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County, No. CT2008-0067,
                                    2009-Ohio-2690.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of
our decision in State v. Rohrbaugh, 126 Ohio St. 3d 421, 2010-Ohio-3286, 934
N.E.2d 920, including a determination of whether the three conditions set forth in
the syllabus of State v. Rohrbaugh were present with regard to appellant’s guilty
plea to the amended indictment.
        BROWN,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG         STRATTON,   O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        David A. Sams, for appellant.
                              ______________________