Court Opinion

ID: 8483470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-14 00:13:08.547053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:46.022318
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-93,731-02

                     EX PARTE TIMOTHY WAYNE DUNLAP, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 007-0185-18-A IN THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT
                                FROM SMITH COUNTY

         Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

         Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle

and was sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Dunlap v. State, No. 12-18-00180-CR (Tex. App. — Tyler June 28, 2019) (not

designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07.

         Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel

advised him that if he entered an open plea, he would receive no more than forty years’

imprisonment. Applicant also alleges that trial counsel failed to object to use of the same
                                                                                                       2

enhancement allegations twice, and failed to argue that the evidence did not support an affirmative

deadly weapon finding. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v.

Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to

respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

        The trial court shall first ensure that the habeas record is supplemented with copies of the

Brooks notice of intent to seek enhanced punishment in this case, the pre-sentencing investigation

report, and transcripts of the plea and punishment proceedings. The trial court shall make findings

of fact as to whether Applicant pleaded “true” to any punishment enhancements in this case, and if

so, why the judgment does not reflect any plea or findings as to punishment enhancements. The trial

court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s performance

was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged deficient

performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate

in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
                                                                                                 3

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 09, 2022
Do not publish