Court Opinion

ID: 4258919
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-28 15:11:21.621843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:52:10.155339
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                                State of Florida

                           Opinion filed March 28, 2018.
          Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                ________________

                                No. 3D17-1963
                         Lower Tribunal No. 14-21972A
                             ________________

                                 Juan Alvarez,
                                     Petitioner,

                                           vs.

                             The State of Florida,
                                    Respondent.

      A Case of Original Jurisdiction—Petition for Belated Appeal.

      Juan Alvarez, in proper person.

     Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney
General, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LUCK, JJ.

      LAGOA, J.

      The Petitioner, Juan Alvarez (“Alvarez”), filed a petition seeking a belated

appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).              For the

following reasons, we deny the petition.
      On November 22, 2017, this Court appointed a commissioner to hold a

limited evidentiary hearing in order to determine whether Alvarez requested that

his counsel file an appeal from his plea and sentence. See Alvarez v. State, 230

So. 3d 625, 626 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). On December 21, 2017, the commissioner

held an evidentiary hearing where both Alvarez and his former counsel, Alejandro

Zamora (“Zamora”), testified. The State proceeded to file the Commissioner’s

Report from that hearing with this Court.

      The commissioner made several factual findings. Specifically, the

commissioner found that “Defendant’s attorney, Mr. Zamora, took detailed notes

at the time of the plea” and that “Zamora credibly testified the Defendant did not

ask him to file an appeal nor was it referenced in his detailed notes.”       The

commissioner further found that Alvarez was “not credible” and that various

statements he made during the evidentiary hearing were “in fact refuted by the

prior record,” including the Order of Probation as well as the February 10, 2017,

plea and sentencing hearing transcript. Based on these findings, the commissioner

found that Alvarez did not request for his attorney to file a direct appeal. We

accept the commissioner’s recommendation and deny Alvarez’s petition for

belated appeal. See Svoboda v. State, 932 So. 2d 545, 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

      Petition denied.

                                            2