Court Opinion

ID: 3164372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-21 20:00:56.705503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:44.281186
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished .PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not. binding precedent in this circuit. .
 

  PER CURIAR!;
 

  Juliet Wright appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to disquálify the trial judge and magistrate judge and her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. With respect to Wright’s motion to disqualify, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Wright v. James City Cnty.,
  
  No. 4:12-ev-00153-RBSLRL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2015, entered Aug. 24, 2015).
 

  With respect to the denial of Wright’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, we confíne our appellate review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s informal opening brief.
  
   See
  
  4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wright’s informal opening brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s denial of her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, Wright has forfeited appellate review of that portion of the court’s order. Wright’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
 

  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- contentions are adequately presented -in the materials before this court and ax-gument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.