Court Opinion

ID: 6945783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:25:28.224875+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:54.607618
License: Public Domain

Wilson, Chief Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: The material facts set out in the complainant’s bill, are, that in 1831 they obtained a judgment in the Randolph Circuit Court against J. Edgar, for #839 ; that in 1833, an execution issued on this judgment, which was replevied with R. Morrison as surety. Other executions afterwards issued, which were returned unsatisfied. The bill further sets out that Edgar died insolvent, but that at the time of the rendition of the judgment, he was the owner of lands in the counties of Randolph, Jackson, and Perry, all of which were sold to persons who are made defendants to the bill of complaint, subject however, to the judgment of the complainants ; and concludes with a prayer that the lien may be perpetual, and the land sold to satisfy their judgment. To this bill the defendants demurred; the Court sustained the demurrer; and the decision of the Court sustaining the demurrer, is the error assigned for the reversal of the judgment below. It is clear that the complainants have mistaken their remedy, and the effect of their judgment. It is not the province of a court of chancery to carry into effect the judgments of á court of law. The powers of a court of law are amply sufficient to carry into effect its own adjudications. The statute makes judgments of the Circuit Court a lien upon all the lands of the defendant within its jurisdiction. No sale or transfer of those lands after judgment, will exempt them from the operation of an execution at any time within seven years, since the act of 1835.(1) In this case, according to the complainant’s own showing, the lands were sold subject to their judgment. The party, then, have mistaken their remedy, in applying to a court of chancery to enforce their judgment, instead of availing themselves of the process of the Court by which it was rendered. If by the lapse of time, and their own laches, they have lost their lien, a court of chancery cannot aid them, by extending the lien beyond the period limited by law; neither can it make the judgment of the Randolph Circuit Court a lien upon the land lying in the counties of Jackson and Perry. The judgment of a Circuit Court creates no lien upon land beyond the limit of its jurisdiction, to wit, the county in which such judgment is rendered. The judgment of the Court below is affirmed with costs. Judgment affirmed.   R. L. 371; Gale’s Stat. 389.