Court Opinion

ID: 1028637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:44:12.592933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:26.109460
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 08-8320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

MICHAEL R. JACKSON,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:93-cr-00125-RLW-1)

Submitted:    April 23, 2009                  Decided:   May 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Michael R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).      We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.       See United States v. Jackson, No. 3:93-

cr-00125-RLW-1    (E.D.   Va.    Oct.       8,   2008).    We   deny   Jackson’s

motion   for   appointment      of   counsel.        We   dispense     with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                        2