Court Opinion

ID: 8124920
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:04:58.578162+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:10.984502
License: Public Domain

Benedict, J.
The answer, to which exception is taken, avers that the libelants were notified of the readiness of the steamer to deliver the goods mentioned in the bill of lading sued on, and thereupon informed the owners of the steamer that they, the libelants, were not in a position to take the goods, and that Jacob D. Nordlinger was the owner of the goods. This was, in legal effect, a refusal on the part of the libelants to receive the goods. Upon such refusal the only duty attaching to the ship was to keep the goods for the owner. This duty they discharged when they delivered the goods to Nordlinger..
The exceptions to the answer must be overruled and the libel dismissed, unless libelants notice the cause for trial, and pay the costs of this hearing within 20 days.