Court Opinion

ID: 7422803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:44:15.452927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:21.970617
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.
Affirmed.