Court Opinion

ID: 9586455
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:11:17.340035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:31:42.876798
License: Public Domain

Eberhardt, Judge,
dissenting. In addition to the reasons asserted by Judge Frankhm in his dissent, with which I concur, I dissent from so much of Division 2 of the majority opinion holding that special ground 7 of the amended motion for new trial is without merit. In that ground plaintiff in error excepts to the charge that “If she [plaintiff] proves by the evidence that the defendant committed one or more of such allegations of negligence, this would be sufficient insofar as proof of negligence is concerned.” It is the same charge dealt with in Dowis v. McCurdy, ante, and for the reasons set forth in my dissent in that case I dissent here.
I am authorized to say that Presiding Judge Bell concurs in this dissent.