Court Opinion

ID: 9882330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-05 20:01:16.613494+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:26.785768
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-13887    Document: 48-1     Date Filed: 10/05/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-13887
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       CODY DILLON HOGAN,
       a.k.a. Stonetelephone,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00143-BJD-MCR-1
USCA11 Case: 22-13887      Document: 48-1      Date Filed: 10/05/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  22-13887

                            ____________________

       Before GRANT, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Jenny Devine, appointed counsel for Cody Hogan in this di-
       rect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
       sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal-
       ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
       record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Hogan’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED. Hogan’s motion to withdraw his prior motions and
       supplement his brief is GRANTED, and his motions to supplement
       his brief are DENIED AS MOOT.