Court Opinion

ID: 543340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:10.204244
License: Public Domain

905 F.2d 1531
Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Kenneth PEEBLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;  Central ClassificationBoard, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7237.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 28, 1990.Decided May 21, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-667-AM)
Kenneth Peebles, appellant pro se.
Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Kenneth Peebles appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Peebles v. Director, Dep't. of Corrections, CA-88-667-AM (E.D.Va. Oct. 31, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.