Court Opinion

ID: 71826
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 07:23:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:35.353052
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  The district court’s judgment is affirmed. That court had jurisdiction of the case with the federal claim. If an amendment had been allowed, jurisdiction would have remained. Plaintiffs made no response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the judgment was granted three months later. Plaintiffs claim no error of that.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.