Court Opinion

ID: 1017022
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:58:18.810678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:56.423798
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 05-6496

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM LARNELL ECKLES, JR.,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-00-46-V; CA-04-199-5-2-V)

Submitted:   August 25, 2005              Decided:   September 1, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Larnell Eckles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          William Larnell Eckles, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).   We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Eckles has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).        Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                              - 2 -