Court Opinion

ID: 8916419
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 05:15:46.556542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:09:02.056474
License: Public Domain

Pursuant to the decision and remand by the Supreme Court of the United States in this case, Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. NLRB, 456 U.S. 645, 102 S.Ct. 2071, 72 L.Ed.2d 398 (1982), it is ORDERED:
1. That the opinion previously entered in these cases by this court en banc, 654 F.2d 1301 (1981) be modified as follows:
(a) The sentence beginning at 654 F.2d at 1304, right column, line 13, originally reading:
We also conclude that unions may picket or strike to obtain such agreements, but not to enforce them.
is vacated and the following is substituted therefor:
We also conclude that unions may not picket or strike to enforce such agreements.
(b) Question numbered (3) in 654 F.2d at 1307, left column, line 7, is vacated, and the following question (4) is renumbered question (3).
(c) The two paragraphs comprising the text for headnote [12] in 654 F.2d at 1323, and footnotes 41 and 42 pertaining thereto, are vacated.
As so modified, the opinion is readopted.
2. The petition of Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. for review of that portion of the Board’s decision holding that picketing to obtain a subcontractor clause does not violate § 8(b)(4) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4), is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
3. The orders of the Board are enforced in their entirety. Judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 29 of this Court.