Court Opinion

ID: 4220034
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-14 09:10:23.631444+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:05.345170
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 November 01, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0484. CRAIG SIMMONS v. THE STATE.

      In 2003, Craig Simmons pled guilty to two counts of armed robbery, two
counts of kidnapping, burglary, and financial identity fraud. In 2016, he filed a
motion to correct illegal and void sentence, arguing that he was charged with two
counts of kidnapping the same victim and that “Georgia’s proscription against double
jeopardy prohibits dual conviction of the kidnapping of the same victim.” The trial
court dismissed Simmons’ motion because it was a challenge to his conviction, and
Simmons filed this notice of appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year
after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,
whichever is later. Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010).
Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void sentence. Id.
Moreover, a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of a motion to modify a
sentence filed outside the statutory time period unless the motion raises a colorable
claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. Id. And a sentence is void only if the court
imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670
(604 SE2d 483) (2004).“Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to
claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the
sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013).
      Here, Simmons does not contend that his sentence exceeds the most severe
punishment allowed. Rather, although Simmons captioned his motion as a challenge
to his sentence, he actually challenges his convictions and asserts that his sentence
should be changed accordingly. See Nazario v. State, 293 Ga. 480, 487 (2) (c) (746
SE2d 109) (2013). “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction” which,
in substance, is what Simmons filed here, “is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal
case” and any appeal from an order denying such a motion must be dismissed. Harper
v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1)-(2) (686 SE2d 786) (2009); see also Roberts v. State,
286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Because Simmons is not permitted to
collaterally attack his conviction in this manner, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        11/01/2017
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.