Court Opinion

ID: 990857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:27:55.751324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:45.849490
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GLENN MORGAN FRANCIS, SR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-90-177-R, CA-94-341-R)

Submitted:   November 7, 1996          Decided:     November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Morgan Francis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order and order on

reconsideration denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of
1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Francis, Nos. CR-90-177-R; CA-94-341-R

(W.D. Va. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2