Court Opinion

ID: 2925844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:27:57.511103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:13.626699
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-004-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL S. MOSES

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, Stephen Moses, attempts to appeal a judgment of contempt entered
against him on December 17, 2007.  This court does not have jurisdiction to review
contempt orders by direct appeal.  See Norman v. Norman, 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex.
1985); Tracy v. Tracy, 219 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2007, no pet.).  Contempt
orders may be reviewed only by an application for a writ of habeas corpus, if the contemnor
has been confined, or by a petition for a writ of mandamus, if the contemnor has not been
confined.  See Rosser v. Squier, 902 S.W.2d 962, 962 (Tex. 1995); Ex parte Williams, 690
S.W.2d 243, 243 (Tex. 1985); Tracy, 219 S.W.3d at 290.
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Accordingly, the
appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.  See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(a), (c). 
									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 6th day of March, 2008.