Court Opinion

ID: 8205470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-12 00:00:28.333122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:09.051886
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-11097     Document: 00516466166         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/09/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                                                       FILED
                                                               September 9, 2022
                                  No. 21-11097                    Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Samuel Steven Calderon-Portillo,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:19-CR-260-1

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Samuel Steven
   Calderon-Portillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calderon-Portillo has not filed a

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-11097     Document: 00516466166          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/09/2022

                                   No. 21-11097

   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2