Court Opinion

ID: 815941
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-01-25 02:47:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:21.389184
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          FILED
                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                            JAN 23 2013

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FRANCISCA AGUILAR ROCHA,                          No. 08-73813

                Petitioner,                       Agency No. A078-638-837

   v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM*
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

                Respondent.

                       On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals

                              Submitted January 18, 2013**
                                San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

        Rocha petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s denial of

her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) and we deny

the petition.

         *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
         **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      The Board did not abuse its discretion because it gave a reasoned basis for

its decision by stating correctly that Rocha had submitted no evidence showing that

she had a well-founded fear of persecution or that she faces a clear probability of

torture. See Konstantinova v. I.N.S., 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir. 1999).

      PETITION DENIED.

                                          2