Court Opinion

ID: 9943052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-22 18:01:50.427154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:00.523150
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-10278    Document: 20-1     Date Filed: 02/22/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-10278
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       HELIO ROLANDO LOPEZ-ELIZALDE,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cr-00012-AW-GRJ-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10278      Document: 20-1      Date Filed: 02/22/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-10278

       Before WILSON, JORDAN, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Richard Summa, counsel for Helio Lopez-Elizalde in this di-
       rect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
       sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal-
       ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
       record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Lopez-Elizalde’s convictions and to-
       tal sentence are AFFIRMED.