Court Opinion

ID: 9672580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:57:32.19678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:17.339119
License: Public Domain

Hoekstra, J.
(concurring). Because I am required by MCR 7.215(H) to follow the flat-bar rule adopted by this Court in Romska v Opper, 234 Mich App 512; 594 NW2d 853 (1999), I concur with the result of the majority opinion. For the reasons stated in my concurrence in our original decision in this case and my dissent in Romska, I remain convinced that the intent rule is the better-reasoned rule and is more consistent with the case law and statutes of Michigan.