Court Opinion

ID: 8673492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:55:52.53017+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.803834
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 29, 2008, be affirmed. The Attorney General of the United States has absolute discretion in deciding whether to investigate claims for possible civil or criminal prosecution. See Wayte v. U.S., 470 U.S. 598, 607, 105 S.Ct. 1524, 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985). Such discretionary decisions are not generally subject to judicial review. See Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Reno, 56 F.3d 1476, 1480-81 (D.C.Cir.1995) (and cases cited therein).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.