Court Opinion

ID: 9544346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:54:55.186748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:12:48.312105
License: Public Domain

SUTIN, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the conviction for rape. I dissent on the sodomy charge because § 40A-9-6, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6) is unconstitutional. Dissenting opinions, State v. Trejo, 83 N.M. 511, 494 P.2d 173 (Ct.App.1972) ; State v. Armstrong, 85 N.M. 234, 511 P.2d 560 (Ct.App.), decided May 23, 1973.