Court Opinion

ID: 8479712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 16:41:31.797973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.108658
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. South Carolina, No. 2:09-cv-03148-HMH-SC (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the *375decisional process. The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

AFFIRMED.