Court Opinion

ID: 991383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:35:50.97335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:47.523805
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-2565

GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS, SR.,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

DAVID GODWIN,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief
District Judge. (CA-96-138-7-F)

Submitted:   January 23, 1997              Decided:   January 31, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Reynold Evans, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and on his motion for re-

consideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Evans v. Godwin, No. CA-96-138-7-F
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2