Court Opinion

ID: 9367070
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-30 19:08:35.544519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:56.472783
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Dean, 2023-Ohio-268.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                           ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                PORTAGE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                   CASE NO. 2022-P-0079
CITY OF RAVENNA,

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,             Criminal Appeal from the
                                                 Municipal Court, Ravenna Division
        - vs -

RANDY KENNETH DEAN,                              Trial Court No. 2022 CRA 00293 R

                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                          MEMORANDUM
                                            OPINION

                                     Decided: January 30, 2023
                                    Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna,
OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Randy Kenneth Dean, pro se, 4618 State Route 43, Kent, OH 44240 (Defendant-
Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.

        {¶1}     This matter is before this court on the pro se notice of appeal and motion

for leave to file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A), filed by appellant, Randy

Kenneth Dean, on December 7, 2022.

        {¶2}     In the trial court, appellant was charged with burglary. Appellant’s notice of

appeal indicates that he is appealing a February 23, 2022 entry; however, the final

judgment in this case is the March 4, 2022 entry, which dismisses the burglary charge.
       {¶3}   A timely notice of appeal from the March 4, 2022 entry was due no later

than April 4, 2022, which is not a weekend or a holiday. Thus, appellant’s appeal is

untimely by approximately eight months.

       {¶4}   No brief or memorandum in opposition to appellant’s motion has been filed.

       {¶5}   App.R. 4(A)(1) states, in part:

       {¶6}   “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of that entry.”

       {¶7}   In criminal cases, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of an

appellate court after the appeal time has run. App.R. 5(A).

       {¶8}   An appellate court is limited to the review of final orders from lower courts.

Section 3(B)(2), Article IV, Ohio Constitution; R.C. 2953.02.

       {¶1}   Under R.C. 2505.02(B), there are seven categories of “final orders,” and if

a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of one of them, it will be considered a “final order”

which can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals. Germ v. Fuerst,

11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3.

       {¶2}   The trial court’s March 4, 2022 entry dismissing the charge against

appellant does not fall under any of the categories in R.C. 2505.02 for being a final

appealable order. Because the charge was dismissed, appellant was placed in the same

position as he was in prior to the filing of the charge against him. Thus, the entry is not a

final appealable order. See State v. Barna, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2021-P-0092, 2021-

Ohio-3794; State v. Nixon, 11th Dist. Portage App. Nos. 2021-P-0075, 2021-P-0076,

2021-P-0082, and 2021-P-0083, 2021-Ohio-3291; City of Hudson/State v. Harger, 9th

Dist. Summit No. 26208, 2012-Ohio-2604, ¶ 8.

                                                2

Case No. 2022-P-0079
       {¶3}   Accordingly, appellant’s motion is overruled as moot, and the appeal is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.

                                          3

Case No. 2022-P-0079