Court Opinion

ID: 3109235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:35:22.687896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:54.219018
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00269-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
PACIFIC EMPLOYERS
INSURANCE COMPANY,                   Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
JOHN T. HANNIGAN,
C.R.N.A. AND 
FRED L. PEREZ, M.D.,                                                                 Appellees.

 ____________________________________________________________
 
                           On
appeal from the 398th District Court 
                                       of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
            
The
appellant's brief in the above cause was due on October 29, 2010.  On November
9, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of
prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within
ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained
the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's
failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been received from
appellant.  
Appellant
has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion
for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief.  Accordingly, the
appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 16th
day of December, 2010.