Court Opinion

ID: 8909857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 02:32:08.545726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:26.412695
License: Public Domain

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing of 597 F.2d 35 filed by Appellee in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.
For the reasons pointed out by Judges Rosenn and Gibbons, Judges Adams and Higginbotham believe that the issues raised in this appeal are of sufficient importance so as to command the attention of the full Court. Accordingly, they vote for rehearing.