Court Opinion

ID: 8454002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:49:48.84762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.188474
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
David John Arevalo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and six-month sentence for making a false statement in a passport application and use thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1542. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Areva-lo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Arevalo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.