Court Opinion

ID: 9388890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-22 00:00:30.115653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:23.708120
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10561        Document: 00516722298             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/21/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 22-10561
                                    Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                    ____________                                  April 21, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Juan Pablo Hernandez-Ramos,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:21-CR-291-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Pablo
   Hernandez-Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Ramos has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10561    Document: 00516722298         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/21/2023

                                 No. 22-10561

   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2