Court Opinion

ID: 9914100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-29 17:00:40.231473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:11.062584
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-3261     Document: 010110976028        Date Filed: 12/29/2023      Page: 1
                                                                                  FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                        December 29, 2023
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-3261
                                                   (D.C. No. 6:23-CM-60025-EFM-1)
  JESUS AARON BELTRAN-DEL RIO,                                  (D. Kan.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                          _________________________________

 Before HARTZ, CARSON, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.
                   _________________________________

       In this bail appeal, the parties have filed a joint motion to remand for the

 district court to hold a detention hearing. We grant the parties’ motion. We remand

 for the district court to hold a detention hearing. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

                                             Entered for the Court

                                             Per Curiam

       *
         After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
 unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of
 this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore
 ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding
 precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral
 estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with
 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.