Court Opinion

ID: 4467136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-23 20:00:35.906554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:54.415142
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-6955

ANDRE KING,

                    Petitioner - Appellant,

             v.

MCFADDEN,

                    Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00091-JMC)

Submitted: December 19, 2019                                Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Andre King appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend or reopen

the period to note an appeal from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

King v. McFadden, No. 1:14-cv-00091-MC (D.S.C. May 31, 2019). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED

                                            2