Court Opinion

ID: 555181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:09:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:42.724962
License: Public Domain

924 F.2d 1051Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Richard Lee CREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Toni V. BAIR, C.E. Thompson, Warden, Lisa Bowes, PatriciaBlakely, W.R. Speede, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6937.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 7, 1991.Decided Jan. 31, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  James R. Spencer, District Judge.  (CA-89-649-R)
Richard Lee Crews, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Richard Lee Crews appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Crews v. Bair, CA-89-649-R (E.D.Va. Sept. 25 and Nov. 20, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.