Court Opinion

ID: 4208704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-03 19:01:01.739209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:39.686399
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Elizabeth Rushing appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Rushing,
  
  No. 3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED