Court Opinion

ID: 5901738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 03:23:20.08316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:41.790403
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), imposed July 23, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 926 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.