Court Opinion

ID: 4708367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-02 16:00:31.375961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:53.098810
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 21-1152
                      ___________________________

                             Rosalind A. Clayton

                     lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service; American Postal
                         Workers Union, AFL-CIO

                    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                       ___________________________

                              No. 21-1153
                      ___________________________

                              Rosalind A. Clayton

                     lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service; American Postal
                         Workers Union, AFL-CIO

                    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                     ____________

                  Appeals from United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                ____________
                               Submitted: July 28, 2021
                                Filed: August 2, 2021
                                    [Unpublished]
                                    ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In these consolidated appeals, Rosalind Clayton challenges orders entered by
the district court1 in her employment action. After careful review of the record and
the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal as to the district court’s
dismissal of some of Clayton’s claims, see Coons v. Mineta, 410 F.3d 1036, 1039
(8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review); adverse grant of summary judgment as to her
remaining claims, see Denson v. Steak ’n Shake, Inc., 910 F.3d 368, 370 (8th Cir.
2018) (standard of review); and denial of her post-judgment motions, see Innovative
Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Assocs., 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir. 1998)
(standard of review for denial of motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)); see also Bell
v. Pulmosan Safety Equip. Corp., 906 F.3d 711, 714-15 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of
review for denial of motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4)). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                         ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

                                           -2-