Court Opinion

ID: 9388517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-20 19:02:30.080533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:20.892290
License: Public Domain

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
 UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
                 AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

                                    IN THE
             ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
                                DIVISION ONE

                     STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

                                        v.

                  CHEYENNE DEAN MOORE, Petitioner.

                         No. 1 CA-CR 22-0401 PRPC
                             FILED 4-20-2023

     Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County
                         No. S8015CR201800830
           The Honorable Douglas Camacho, Judge Pro Tempore

                  REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

                                   COUNSEL

Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Kingman
By Jacob Cote
Counsel for Respondent

Cheyenne Dean Moore, Florence
Petitioner

                       MEMORANDUM DECISION

Vice Chief Judge David B. Gass, Judge Brian Y. Furuya, and Judge Andrew
M. Jacobs delivered the decision of the court.
                             STATE v. MOORE
                            Decision of the Court

PER CURIAM:

¶1             Petitioner Cheyenne Dean Moore seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is
petitioner’s seventh petition.

¶2             Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is
petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by
denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz.
537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of
establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3            We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for
review, and the response. We find that petitioner has not established an
abuse of discretion.

¶4            We grant review and deny relief.

                         AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
                         FILED: AA

                                         2