Court Opinion

ID: 9909058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-12 15:09:40.251463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:51.819265
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                      San Antonio, Texas
                                            December 6, 2023

                                          No. 04-23-00921-CV

                                   IN RE Maryvel SUDAY, Relator

                                          Original Proceeding 1

                                                 ORDER

        On October 16, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On October 23, 2023,
the real party in interest filed a response. On October 24, 2023, relator filed a “Motion for
Emergency Relief Pending a Ruling on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” Relator then filed a “First
Supplement” to the motion for emergency relief. After considering the petition, the response, and
all exhibits attached thereto, this court concludes relator has not shown herself to be entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a). Furthermore, relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied.

        It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2023.

                                                                   _____________________________
                                                                   Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 6th day of December, 2023.

                                                                   _____________________________
                                                                   Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 3625CCL, styled Jesus L. Suday v. Olga Tamez de Suday, pending in the
1

County Court, Val Verde County, Texas, the Honorable Stephen B. Ables presiding.