Court Opinion

ID: 8029998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:03:49.39228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.388929
License: Public Domain

On December 6,2005, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment of five (5) years to the Department of Corrections, to run consecutively with the sentence received in Cause No. DC-97-0623, for the offense of Count II: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs (Percocet), a felony.
On April 7, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Brandon Hartford. The state was represented by Rod Souza.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
*39DATED this 14th day of April, 2006.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 7th day of April, 2006.
Chairperson, Hon. John Whelan, Member, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding and Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin.