Court Opinion

ID: 9398478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-31 15:06:15.793445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:33.915808
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                          Opinion filed May 31, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-443
                      Lower Tribunal No. F20-11306
                          ________________

                               Adila Rivera,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                          The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen
Cabarga, Judge.

      Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.

    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.

     LOGUE, J.
     Adila Rivera appeals her conviction for unlicensed carrying of a

concealed firearm, contending that the trial court erred in denying her motion

to suppress. We affirm the conviction.

      The relevant facts are not in dispute: On August 20, 2020, officers were

dispatched to investigate a “Shotspotter” alert.1 Upon arriving at the scene,

the officers found bullet casings in the curtilage of a house and observed

bullet holes near the front door. Ms. Rivera subsequently appeared at the

scene and voluntarily approached the officers. She appeared intoxicated and

smelled of alcohol. She told the officers her boyfriend resided at the house,

and that she had been having problems with him, repeating at various time

that he had been unfaithful.

      During the exchange, Ms. Rivera spontaneously stated that she had a

firearm in her bag. One of the officers then stated, “Do me a favor. Hand me

your bag. Just for safety reasons.” The officer testified at the suppression

hearing that she sought to secure Ms. Rivera’s bag based on a totality of the

circumstances, including (1) the officers were responding to a report of shots

fired, (2) they found bullet casings at the scene, and (3) Ms. Rivera appeared

intoxicated and smelled of alcohol. After taking the bag from Ms. Rivera, the

1
 A “Shotspotter” is a type of technology that alerts to the sound of gunshots
and dispatches police officers to the location.

                                      2
officer asked her if she could remove the gun from the bag to safely secure

it. Ms. Rivera consented.

      Based on these circumstances, the officers had a reasonable

suspicion that Ms. Rivera violated section 790.151, Florida Statutes. Section

790.151 makes it unlawful for any person who is under the influence of

alcoholic beverages to use a firearm. See also Brinegar v. State, 327 So. 3d

1274, 1275-76 (Makar, J., concurring) (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (stating

circumstantial evidence including police officers’ observations that defendant

had slurred speech and reeked of alcohol was sufficient to support jury

finding that defendant used firearm while under the influence). Accordingly,

the trial court properly denied Ms. Rivera’s motion to suppress.

      Affirmed.

                                      3