Court Opinion

ID: 991136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:32:20.451794+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:49.108728
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONNIE BUMPUS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CR-91-148, CA-94-500)

Submitted:   December 19, 1996         Decided:     December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Bumpus, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, John Castle
Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Bumpus, Nos. CR-91-148; CA-94-500 (S.D.W.

Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2