Court Opinion

ID: 8621291
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 09:07:12.44991+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:31.044022
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ernesto Castillo Lopez, Jr. appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Castillo Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Castillo Lopez has not filed a pro se brief, and the Government has not filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.