Court Opinion

ID: 2731113
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-09 05:00:28.621851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:01:18.204996
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20689      Document: 00512760438         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/08/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                    No. 13-20689
                                                                          September 8, 2014
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE LOPEZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Guadalupe
Lopez, also known as Jose Guadalupe Alvarez Lopez, also known as Jose
Guadalupe Lopez Alvarez, also known as Jose G. Lopez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:13-CR-477-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe
Lopez-Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Alvarez has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20689    Document: 00512760438   Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/08/2014

                               No. 13-20689

reflected therein.   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2