Court Opinion

ID: 99291
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:46:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:02.201707
License: Public Domain

248 U.S. 543
39 S.Ct. 133
63 L.Ed. 413
Frederick R. SEARS et al., plaintiffs in error,v.INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 23, 1918

Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.

1
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181, 19 Sup. Ct. 644, 43 L. Ed. 936; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243, 20 Sup. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 36 Sup. Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701.