Court Opinion

ID: 3008989
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-09 13:15:14.432533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:03:19.768125
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-15-00369-CR

                                    Dacious Parker, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                     State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
      NO. D-1-DC-12-600094, HONORABLE P. DAVID WALHBERG, JUDGE PRESIDING

                 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

               Appellant Dacious Parker pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated

assault-enhanced and the district court placed him on deferred-adjudication community supervision

for a period of ten years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to proceed with an adjudication of

guilt. Parker pleaded “not true” to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate and was sentenced to

twenty years’ imprisonment. This appeal followed.

               The rules of appellate procedure require a trial court to “enter a certification of the

defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.”

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The certification in this cause indicates that this is a plea-bargain case

and the defendant has no right of appeal, but the record indicates that Parker did not plead guilty or

nolo contendere but “not true” to the allegations in the State’s motion to adjudicate. See
Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (concluding that “when the

defendant appeals from the proceeding on the motion to adjudicate guilt, Rule 25.2(a)(2) will not

restrict appeal”).

                In light of the apparent discrepancy between the certification and the record, we abate

the appeal and remand the cause to the district court for entry of an amended certification addressing

Parker’s right of appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610,

614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (concluding that appellate courts may examine certification for

defectiveness and use Appellant Rules of Procedure 37.1 and 34.5(c) when appropriate to obtain

another certification and noting that “[Rule 25.2(a)(2)] refers only to plea bargains with regard to

guilty pleas, not pleas of true on revocation motions”).

                Once entered, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and

filed with this Court no later than October 29, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Abated and Remanded

Filed: October 9, 2015

Do Not Publish

                                                  2