Court Opinion

ID: 8469761
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 11:29:57.650735+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:17.275251
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
The district court properly admitted testimony relating to financial gain. Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). The Government’s characterization of the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in closing argument, if error, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Perlaza, 439 F.3d 1149, 1171 & n. 25 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.