Court Opinion

ID: 2964242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:22:39.484256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:06.408988
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          July 16, 1996
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1130

                                 GERALD M. CIARDELLO,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                    MAXFLI, A DIVISION OF DUNLOP/SLAZINGER CORP.,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                   [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                       __________________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                          Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Gerald M. Ciardello on brief pro se.
            ___________________
            Kevin  M. Leach, Arthur  G. Greene  and McLane,  Graf, Raulerson &
            _______________  _________________      __________________________
        Middleton, Professional Association on brief for appellee.
        ___________________________________

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and
                 ___________

            the  record on appeal.  We affirm essentially for the reasons

            stated in the district court's order of December 19, 1995.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________

                                         -3-