Court Opinion

ID: 5837903
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 22:44:10.28104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:40.574836
License: Public Domain

We agree with both parties that the court properly granted a Yellowstone injunction (see First Natl. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 NY2d 630 [1968]), and that dismissal was improper. Gold-Land, Inc. v Haskell (248 AD2d 132 [1998]), on which the court relied, presents the opposite factual scenario and gives no support for dismissal. In Gold-Land, dismissal was appropriate because Supreme Court denied Yellowstone relief. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.