Court Opinion

ID: 7875540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:08:03.692412+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:31:22.635263
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court determined that A.G. was an “unruly child” under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02 for habitual truancy because she was kept from school for a home learning program supervised by her parents. Our recent decision, In the Interest of C.S., 382 N.W.2d 381 (N.D.1986), held that a child cannot be found “unruly” in these circumstances. That decision is controlling and dispositive. Reversed.
ERICKSTAD, C.J., and MESCHKE, LEVINE, VANDEWALLE and GIERKE, JJ., concur.