Court Opinion

ID: 8335241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 22:17:09.942982+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:31.129415
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
We do not disturb the discretion of the court below in allowing service of amended answer, but think more stringent terms should have been imposed. An amended answer had already been served. On a demurrer to part of the amended answer leave had been given to serve an amended answer. The defendant paid costs but did not act upon the leave. These proceedings did not involve the new matter in the answer which the defendant was permitted to serve. But they were warnings to attend to the sufficiency of the answer as embracing all defenses. The motion below was made just as the case was to be brought on trial. The order below should have as a condition imposed beside what was imposed the taxable term fees, from the time the first amended answer was served. It will be taken that there were five term fees.
The order appealed from is modified by imposing the payment of seventy dollars as a condition of leave and' also that defendant shall file and serve an affidavit of merits. Order, modified and as modified affirmed, without costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.