Court Opinion

ID: 9965236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-01 21:00:39.999724+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:50.667016
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6551      Doc: 45         Filed: 04/30/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-6551

        DARYLL KEITH SHUMAKE,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
        Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:18-cv-00264-MFU-RSB)

        Submitted: March 18, 2024                                         Decided: April 30, 2024

        Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Daryll Keith Shumake, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6551         Doc: 45      Filed: 04/30/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Daryll Keith Shumake appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to

        reconsider the district court’s prior order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and to

        amend his complaint to include additional claims. We have reviewed the record and find

        no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motions and affirm the district

        court’s order. * See Shumake v. Virginia, No. 7:18-cv-00264-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Apr. 8,

        2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

               *
                To the extent Shumake seeks to assert new claims in his motions filed on appeal,
        our denial is without prejudice to any right he may have to assert such claims in a new civil
        action. We are a “‘court of review, not first view.’” United States v. Frank, 8 F.4th 320,
        333 (4th Cir. 2021). We express no view on the merits or viability of any such claims.

                                                     2