Court Opinion

ID: 8870054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 18:23:19.675141+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:08.632499
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
This administrative proceeding has been before this court on three prior occasions. Securities & Exchange Com’n v. R. A. Holman & Co., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 323 F.2d 284, cert, denied, 375 U.S. 943, 84 S.Ct. 350, 11 L.Ed.2d 274 (1963); R. A. Holman & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 299 F.2d 127, cert, denied, 370 U.S. 911, 82 S.Ct. 1257, 8 L.Ed.2d 404 (1962); R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 18300, petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition denied by order, January 28, 1964. For the reasons stated by this court in the two opinions cited, this present proceeding should be dismissed for failure of the appellant to exhaust its administrative remedies. ’
. It is so ordered.