Court Opinion

ID: 2705464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-04 22:36:26.793555+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:04.091224
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Kosturko, 2013-Ohio-2670.]

STATE OF OHIO                     )                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                  )ss:               NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SUMMIT                  )

STATE OF OHIO                                        C.A. No.      26676

        Appellee

        v.                                           APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
                                                     ENTERED IN THE
ANDREW KOSTURKO                                      COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                                                     COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO
        Appellant                                    CASE No.   CR 11 07 1882

                                 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Dated: June 26, 2013

        CARR, Judge.

        Appellant, Andrew Kosturko, appeals the judgment of the Summit County Court of

Common Pleas. This Court affirms.

                                                I.

        On July 20, 2011, the Summit County Grand Jury returned a secret indictment charging

Kosturko with one count of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), a felony of the first degree;

one count of felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), a felony of the second degree;

one count of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(1), a felony of the fourth

degree; and one count of domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A), a misdemeanor of

the first degree. Kosturko pleaded not guilty to the charges at arraignment, and the matter

proceeded to trial. A jury subsequently found Kosturko not guilty of rape, but guilty of felonious

assault, gross sexual imposition, and domestic violence. Kosturko was sentenced to a six-year

term of imprisonment. The trial court issued its sentencing entry on September 27, 2012.
                                                2

Kosturko appeared again before the trial court on October 1, 2012, so that the trial court could

correct an error in the imposition of post-release control. A corrected sentencing entry was

journalized on October 4, 2012.

       Kosturko filed a timely notice of appeal. On October 28, 2012, the trial court appointed

appellate counsel.

                                               II.

       On March 11, 2013, appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded that there were no

assignments of error to be found in this case. Kosturko’s counsel also moved to withdraw as

counsel of record in this matter. Kosturko was served with a copy of appellate counsel’s brief,

and this Court issued a magistrate’s order affording Kosturko an opportunity to raise arguments

after review of the Anders brief. Kosturko has not responded to the brief.

       Upon this Court’s own full, independent examination of the record before us, we find that

there are not appealable, non-frivolous issues in this case. See State v. Randles, 9th Dist. No.

23857, 2008-Ohio-662, ¶ 6; State v. Lowe, 9th Dist. No. 97CA006758 (Apr. 8, 1998).

                                               III.

       The judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Appellate

counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is hereby granted.

                                                                             Judgment affirmed.

       There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
                                                 3

       We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common

Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy

of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.

       Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of

judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the

period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(C). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is

instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the

mailing in the docket, pursuant to App.R. 30.

       Costs taxed to Appellant.

                                                     DONNA J. CARR
                                                     FOR THE COURT

MOORE, P. J.
HENSAL, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

LEE A. SCHAFFER, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and HEAVEN DIMARTINO, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.