Court Opinion

ID: 9594219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:28:13.07689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:29.722145
License: Public Domain

Danhof, C.J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I agree with the majority’s determination that this matter be remanded for resentencing under People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630; 461 NW2d 1 (1990).
However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that, in imposing sentences, sentencing courts are precluded from considering juvenile adjudications obtained without benefit of counsel, and I would hold otherwise. People v Covington, 144 Mich App 652, 654-655; 376 NW2d 178 (1985), *468remanded 425 Mich 853 (1986), lv den 426 Mich 866 (1986), reconsideration gtd and remanded for resentencing 431 Mich 859 (1988); People v Ristich, 169 Mich App 754, 760; 426 NW2d 801 (1988) (concurrence by Danhof, C.J.); People v Himmelein, 177 Mich App 365, 381; 442 NW2d 667 (1989), lv den 434 Mich 903 (1990), reh den 435 Mich 879 (1990), cert den — US —; 111 S Ct 985; 112 L Ed 2d 1070 (1991).