Court Opinion

ID: 9744782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 22:16:05.045206+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:51.726720
License: Public Domain

*199On Petition for Rehearing
Buchanan, P.J.
Defendant-Appellant Sacks filed a Petition for Rehearing on March 4, 1977, and then an Amended Petition for Rehearing on March 9, 1977, to our decision rendered February 15,1977.
His Amended Petition for Rehearing was filed twenty-two (22) days after our decision. Appellate Rule 11(A) requires a Petition for Rehearing to be filed within twenty (20) days1 of the appellate decision, with no extensions of time.2 Sacks’ Amended Petition for Rehearing was therefore not timely and he has preserved for possible error only two sections of our decision as raised in his original Petition for Rehearing, to-wit, ISSUE THREE, mistrial due to juror knowledge of media publicity, and ISSUE FOUR, sufficient evidence of theft by receiving stolen goods.
Petition for Rehearing denied.
Sullivan, J. and Staton, P.J. (by designation), concur.
Note. — Reported at 361 N.E.2d 190.

. The only exception would be if the twentieth (20th) day fell on a weekend or a holiday, AP. 13, which is not the case here as the twentieth (20th) day was Monday, March 7, 1977.

. AP. 11(A), 14(A).