Court Opinion

ID: 6146567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:26:49.491717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:53.167221
License: Public Domain

Church, S.
The evidence in this case shows that the testator had for many years been addicted to the use of intoxicating liquors and that, at the time of the making of this will, he was in bad physical shape. This evidence, standing alone, would call for a very close scrutiny of the circumstances attending the execution of the will.
It is a well-established principle that, where the alleged incompetency results from the use of intoxicants rather than from any mental infirmity, it is necessary, in order to warrant a refusal of probate to a will, to establish that, at the time of the making of such will, the testator was so much under the influence of the intoxicant as to be unable to bring to its execution the calm judgment which the law requires. This fact has not only not been shown, but, on the contrary, the will has been *165shown to have been drafted and executed under the direction of an attorney of this court who has for many years borne an excellent reputation. He explains in minute detail the character of the testator and the nature of the instructions given, in all of which he is corroborated by other witnesses, and his evidence appeals to me as entirely truthful and natural. Under these circumstances, therefore, the will should be admitted to probate.
Probate decreed.