Court Opinion

ID: 9368649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-06 16:00:42.472869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:09.902183
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11772    Document: 29-1     Date Filed: 02/06/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11772
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       VINCENT WALKER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11772     Document: 29-1      Date Filed: 02/06/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                22-11772

       Before JORDAN, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Sheryl Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Vincent Walker in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
       v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
       entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
       of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
       entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s convictions and sen-
       tences are AFFIRMED.