Court Opinion

ID: 993019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:01:33.972104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:53.169982
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7708

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AUSTEN O. NWANZE,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond.     Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-4)

Submitted:   August 28, 1997           Decided:   September 19, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Austen O. Nwanze, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Nwanze, No. CR-92-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2