Court Opinion

ID: 8055082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:31:59.490944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:41.611552
License: Public Domain

By the Court.
We think the state of demand not sufficiently particular; it ought at least to have stated the kind of work and labor done; and also the credit is too vague.1
Judgment reversed.
Cited is Hagerty v. Vankirk, 4 Holst. 118; Farley v. McIntyre, 1 Gr. 190; Howell v. Burnett, Spenc. 265.

 Credit “ by sundries,” insufficient. Vide ante, 206, 561, 628; South. 104, 220; 4 Halst. 118.