Court Opinion

ID: 1030977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:23:37.565833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:51.180675
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-7418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff – Appellee,

             v.

EARL E. RICHARDSON,

                  Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.    James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00122-JRS-1)

Submitted:    December 10, 2009            Decided:   December 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON and      GREGORY,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl E. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Earl E. Richardson appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence.   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.   United States v. Richardson, No. 3:96-cr-00122-

JRS-1 (E.D. Va. July 2, 2009).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2