Court Opinion

ID: 4248606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-27 20:00:31.317913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:10.717173
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 17-7328

MAJIED LEWIS,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

CHESAPEAKE POLICE, K9 Unit Boomer,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00098-MHL-RCY)

Submitted: February 22, 2018                                 Decided: February 27, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Majied Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Majied Lewis appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to compel

discovery. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lewis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the

court’s disposition, Lewis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.       See

Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the magistrate judge’s order. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             AFFIRMED

                                            2