Court Opinion

ID: 1032569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-09 18:48:13.503204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:44.460083
License: Public Domain

MICHAEL STEVE COX,                                          No. 62079
                Petitioner,
                vs.
                THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN
                AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE,
                Respondent.
                MICHAEL STEVE COX,                                          No. 62080
                Petitioner,
                vs.
                THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN
                AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE,
                Resnondent.

                                  ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS

                            These are seven original proper person petitions for
                extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated.
                            Having considered these petitions and supporting documents,
                we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our
                intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly,
                we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c).
                            Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has
                filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking
                extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly
                meritless appeals in this court.   See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056,
                Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637,
                Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing
                of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his
                ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. See Jordan v. State,
                Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety,    121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005),
SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                      2
(0) 1947A

   KlEEZZI
                   abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas,   124
                   Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008).
                               It is so ORDERED. 1

                                                               Hardesty

                                                               Parraguirre

                   cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
                        Michael Steve Cox
                        Attorney General/Carson City
                        Carson City Clerk
                        White Pine County Clerk
                        Eighth District Court Clerk

                         'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's
                   requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this
                   court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket
                   No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19,
                   2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket
                   No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November
                   20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion
                   in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in
                   forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on
                   these motions.

  SUPREME COURT
         OF
      NEVADA
                                                        3
 (0) 1947A

SINEEMEZMMEEMEIN                    11EMESEM-11UMMEMEMEEtiaidiEM
                                            -