Court Opinion

ID: 2845184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 19:05:09.536713+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:22.256470
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-105-CV

WILLIAM R. HURST	APPELLANT

V.

ESTATE OF ROBERT L. HAYNIE, 

DECEASED, LEAH LYNN HAYNIE, 

AND M. DAN KING, INDEPENDENT 

ADMINISTRATOR AND TRUSTEE 	APPELLEES

----------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM
 
OPINION
(footnote: 1) 
AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  
See 
T
EX.
 R. A
PP.
 P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

         DELIVERED: May 8, 2003	  

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.