Court Opinion

ID: 6627765
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:35:28.086313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:58:52.080802
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Dallingeb, J.
It was stipulated that the articles in question are chiefly used on the table and in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Heemsoth v. United States (T. D. 49191) cited.