Court Opinion

ID: 4683554
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-04 00:03:22.374305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:03.278509
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40207      Document: 00515845986         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/03/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                           May 3, 2021
                                  No. 20-40207                           Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Pedro Jose Alfaro,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:19-CR-1261-1

   Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Jose
   Alfaro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alfaro has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40207     Document: 00515845986          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/03/2021

                                   No. 20-40207

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2