Court Opinion

ID: 32677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 18:56:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:37.513586
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                                                    F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    September 12, 2003

                                                                Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                        Clerk
                              No. 02-51108
                            Summary Calendar

DAVID ISCHY,

                                        Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. D. MILES, Warden,

                                        Defendant-Appellee.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. A-01-CV-103-JN
                          --------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     David     Ischy,   federal   prisoner   #   49020-079,    appeals      the

district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants in

his suit filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).        Ischy sued the warden of

the federal prison where he was incarcerated in his official

capacity and sought only injunctive relief.           The district court

determined that it lacked jurisdiction.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                             No. 02-51108
                                  -2-

     Although    Ischy   suggests   that    the    district   court   had

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, he does not identify a

federal    question.     Official   capacity    suits   against   federal

employees are generally treated as suits against the United States.

See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-67 (1985).              However,

suits against the United States brought under the civil rights

statutes are barred by sovereign immunity.         See Affiliated Prof'l

Home Health Care Agency v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 282, 286 (5th Cir.

1999).    Bivens actions may be brought against defendants acting in

their individual capacities only.     See id.     To the extent Ischy has

sued Miles in his official capacity, his claim is barred as a

matter of law.    The district court did not abuse its discretion

when it denied Ishcy’s motion to amend his complaint.         Briddle v.

Scott, 63 F.3d 364, 379 (5th Cir. 1995).

     AFFIRMED.