Court Opinion

ID: 150615
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-07-14 17:19:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:24:21.807189
License: Public Domain

Case: 09-40998       Document: 00511172376          Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/14/2010

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            July 14, 2010
                                     No. 09-40998
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

JOHNNY LYNN EDWARDS,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ELIZABETH MILLER; ANGIE CARGILLE; WESLEY PRATT,

                                                   Defendants-Appellees.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                                  No. 6:09-CV-234

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

       Johnny Edwards, Texas prisoner # 566917, appeals the dismissal of his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which re-

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 09-40998   Document: 00511172376 Page: 2         Date Filed: 07/14/2010
                                No. 09-40998

lief may be granted because the claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
Edwards alleged that prison officials acted improperly in confiscating two items
of mail on February 9, 2007. That is this date on which he became aware of the
facts that would give rise to the complaint. See Piotrowski v. City of Houston,
237 F.3d 567, 576 (5th Cir. 2001); see also Moore v. McDonald, 30 F.3d 616, 621
(5th Cir. 1994).
      As was found by the district court, Edwards is entitled to 87 days of tolling
from February 25, 2007, to May 23, 2007, during which his grievance proceed-
ings were pending. See Jackson v. Johnson, 950 F.2d 263, 265 (5th Cir. 1992);
Holmes v. Texas A&M Univ., 145 F.3d 681, 685 (5th Cir. 1998). Because he did
not file his complaint within two-years plus the 87-day tolled period of Febru-
ary 9, 2007, the complaint was untimely filed. See Stanley v. Foster, 464 F.3d
565, 568 (5th Cir. 2006). The district court did not abuse its discretion in con-
cluding that the complaint was time-barred. See Moore, 30 F.3d at 621.
      The judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                        2