Court Opinion

ID: 9906027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-30 20:01:04.315616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:05.505022
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13316    Document: 12-1     Date Filed: 11/30/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-13316
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       DONELL HATCHER,
       a.k.a. Big Al,
       a.k.a. Daryl Richardson,
       a.k.a. Darryl Wayne Richardson,
       a.k.a. Alan Richardson,
       a.k.a. A Richardson,
       a.k.a. Al,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.
USCA11 Case: 23-13316      Document: 12-1     Date Filed: 11/30/2023     Page: 2 of 3

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-13316

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Alabama
                   D.C. Docket No. 2:07-cr-00144-KOB-JHE-1
                           ____________________

       Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Donell Hatcher appeals from both the district court’s July 22,
       2021, order denying a writ of error coram nobis and its April 19,
       2023, order denying reconsideration of the July 22, 2021, order. Be-
       cause Hatcher’s motion for reconsideration was not timely to toll
       the time to appeal the July 22, 2021, order, the 60-day statutory
       time limit required him to file a notice of appeal from that order on
       or before September 20, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App.
       P. 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(1)(C), 4(a)(4)(A). Similarly, the 60-day statutory
       time limit required Hatcher to file a notice of appeal from the dis-
       trict court’s April 19, 2023, order on or before June 20, 2023. See 28
       U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), 26(a)(1)(C). However,
       Hatcher did not file a notice of appeal until October 6, 2023, past
       both deadlines. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and
       cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood
       Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017).
USCA11 Case: 23-13316     Document: 12-1     Date Filed: 11/30/2023   Page: 3 of 3

       23-13316              Opinion of the Court                       3

             All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for
       rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.