Court Opinion

ID: 9612876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:11:58.521741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:53.249644
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On October 6, 2006, the Clerk of this Court received several documents from Relator Carl Long in the above-referenced original proceedings.
In No. 10-06-239-CV, the Clerk received and filed Long’s “Motion to Show Relator Complies with Order Issued and Exhibit as Proof.” The Court will treat this document as a supplemental record. Tex.R.App. P. 52.7(b).
In No. 10-06-235-CV, the Clerk received, but inadvertently did not file, Long’s “Motion to Submit Exhibits to Support Application for Mandamus and Order Issued by This Court.”1 The Clerk is ordered to file this document as a supplemental record, and the Court will treat it as such. Tex.R.App. P. 52.7(b).
The Clerk marked as “received” the cover letter accompanying Long’s Affidavit of Indigence and his inmate trust fund account print-out. The Clerk is ordered to file these documents in both No. 10-06-235-CV and No. 10-06-239-CV.
With regard to the above documents, we suspend the rule for proof of service (Tex.R.App. P. 9.5) under these circumstances. See Tex.R.App. P. 2; see also Jones v. State, No. 10-06-00289-CR, slip op. at 3, 2006 WL 3438574 (Tex.App.-Waco Nov.22, 2006, no pet. h.) (Gray, C.J.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (suspending proof of service requirement in appeal involving incarcerated, pro se appellant). The Clerk shall mail copies of the above documents to Respondent on the *337date of this order. Any supplemental responses to the petitions for writ of mandamus shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of this order.

. The dissent mischaracterizes a confidential, internal note that discusses not circulating internally Long's documents that are at issue in this order (his supplemental appendices) until the Respondent has filed responses to the petitions.