Court Opinion

ID: 6136027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 21:42:06.939365+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:30.703075
License: Public Domain

Monell, J.
By section 121 of the Code it is provided that no action shall abate by the death of a party; but the court, on motion, at any time within one year thereafter, or afterwards, on a supplemental complaint, may allow the action to be continued by the representative. The death of a sole plaintiff, although it does not, in the language of the Code, “ abate ” the action, suspends all further proceedings until there is a revival by the personal representative of the deceased; so that no step can be taken in the further prosecution of the action until it has been continued by the order of the court. It is the duty of the plaintiff’s representative to apply to the court for leave to continue the action; and in default of his doing so, the defendant may obtain an order to compel such action on the part of the plaintiff’s representative. He cannot move to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. This is in analogy to the practice of the late Court of Chancery (1 Barb. Ch., 244, 676), where it was held that an order dismissing the complaint for want of prosecution, was irregular.
The course of the defendant, if he wishes to proceed with the case, is, to obtain an order requiring the action to be continued in the name of the personal representative of the plaintiff, or to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed. The dismissal of the complaint, therefore, in this action, was irregular, and must be set aside. But as it appears by the affidavit of *48the defendant’s attorney, that he was not aware of the plaintiff’s death, when he moved the dismissal of the complaint, the motion is granted without costs.