Court Opinion

ID: 628349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:08:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:39.341796
License: Public Domain

2 F.3d 1149
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Phillip Charles BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST;  United States Attorney WitnessExpert; United  States Court of Maryland atBaltimore, Maryland,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6541.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 16, 1993.Decided:  August 5, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  M. J. Garbis, District Judge.  (CA-93-1167)
Phillip Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Phillip Charles Brown appeals from the district court's order sua sponte dismissing his Bivens-type* action for damages filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Brown v. Unknown Psychiatrist, No. CA-93-1167 (D. Md. May 12, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.  Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)