Court Opinion

ID: 4185187
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-07-11 19:01:14.011284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:20.954188
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Daniel H. King appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to vacate his civil commitment and dismiss his case for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. King,
  
  No. 5:10-hc-02009-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED