Court Opinion

ID: 2938058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 19:00:26.692575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:48.645382
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 61,198-02

TIMOTHY MANNING, Relator

v.

 DISTRICT CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 
FROM HARRIS COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

 
	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus.  In it, he contends that
he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 183RD Judicial District Court of
Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been
forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District
Clerk of Harris County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the
record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which
designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1992); by stating that the nature of the claims asserted in the application filed by relator
is such that the claims are not cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc., art 11.07, § 3; or
stating that relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in Harris County.  This
application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the
respondent has submitted the appropriate response.  Such response shall be submitted within
30 days of the date of this order.

 IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2006.

DO NOT PUBLISH