Court Opinion

ID: 997515
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:57:43.597197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:05.618187
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7129

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ARMON O’NEAL BEAVERS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-92-46, CA-97-815-R)

Submitted:   December 15, 1998            Decided:   January 5, 1999

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Armon O’Neal Beavers, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   United States v. Beavers, Nos. CR-92-46; CA-97-815-R

(W.D. Va. July 21, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2