Court Opinion

ID: 3511383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:22:08.087708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:43.603407
License: Public Domain

Upon petition for reargument it is contended that L. 1921, p. 350, c. 292, is unconstitutional as a modification of Sp. L. 1866, p. 150, c. 29, as amended by Sp. L. 1889, p. 758, c. 132. We do not regard the contention as well founded. The 1921 law is rather a repeal of part of the special law as defined in State ex rel. Stortroen v. Lincoln, 133 Minn. 178, 184,158 N.W. 50.
We adhere to our former conclusion.