Court Opinion

ID: 9660960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:24:57.766182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:10.420267
License: Public Domain

ARCHER, Chief Justice
(concurring).
I concur in the judgment in this case but I disavow any purpose to create or the creation of a “judicial monster” or even a “catch penny contrivance” in the decision *460by the majority of this Court in this case, but that the judgment of the Trial Court was believed to be a correct one.
This explanation is written because of statements made in a dissenting opinion. The Legislature enacted the Summary Judgment Statute and it is its responsibility to repeal it if it is so obnoxious as to become a device to trap the unwary.
If one’s logic and reasons are valid, there is no need to decide the question by sharp words or insinuations with respect to the trial of a case, or a review of such case on appeal.