Court Opinion

ID: 7798591
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-08 00:15:28.775265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:50.223062
License: Public Domain

Opinion filed August 4, 2022

                                     In The

        Eleventh Court of Appeals
                                  __________

                               No. 11-21-00166-CR
                                   __________

                      JOSE ANGEL SILVA, Appellant
                                       V.
                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                     On Appeal from the 70th District Court
                              Ector County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. A-20-1131-CR

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
      The jury convicted Appellant, Jose Angel Silva, of the offense of continuous
sexual abuse of a young child. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.02 (West Supp.
2021). The jury assessed Appellant’s punishment at imprisonment for life, and the
trial court sentenced him accordingly. We affirm.
      Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to
withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and
conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of
the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record
and the reporter’s record. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to review the record
and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to
file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed
counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252
S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1991).
        Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the
procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the
record, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.1
        We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the
trial court.

                                                                 PER CURIAM

August 4, 2022
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

        1
         We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68
of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

                                                    2