Court Opinion

ID: 1006860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:17:14.732961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:45.953333
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RODNEY CURTIS HAMRICK,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-91-56, CA-99-90-5)

Submitted:   February 21, 2002             Decided:   March 5, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Curtis Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. David Jonathan Horne,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Dayton, Ohio; David Earl
Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rodney Curtis Hamrick seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Hamrick, Nos. CR-91-56; CA-99-90-5

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 13, 2001).      We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2