Court Opinion

ID: 2925387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:20:32.692643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:52:52.509848
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00144-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
CLAUDIA DOMINGUEZ AND EFREN DOMINGUEZ, 	Appellants,

v.

LASER VAGINAL REJUVENATION 
INSTITUTE, MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ,	Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court 
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 Appellants, Claudia Dominguez and Efren Dominguez, brought an appeal from a
judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number
C-1305-06-A-1.  Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that they
no longer desire to prosecute it.   
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a).  Appellants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.    Because the motion lacks an agreement between the parties regarding the
assessment of costs, costs will be taxed against appellants.  See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed
the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our
mandate will issue forthwith.

							PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 26th day of June, 2008.