Court Opinion

ID: 9833968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:11:31.371787+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:09.959847
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In the original opinion we held there'was no assignment of error in appellant’s brief *443which properly raised the question of the want of evidence to support the judgment of the trial court, and for that reason we refused to pass on that question. Appellant has filed his motion for rehearing, and insists therein that the second assignment in his brief was sufficient to raise the issue.
After a review of the second assignment, we have concluded to consider the same, and after a careful examination of the facts, and all the facts proven, we have reached the conclusion that such facts are wholly insufficient to support the judgment rendered in favor of Haymes against Dixon. We therefore grant the motion for rehearing, and now set aside so much of our former judgment as affirmed that portion of the judgment of the trial court above mentioned, and it is now ordered that so much of the judgment of the trial court as is in favor of T. L. Haymes against W. N. Dixon be reversed, and that judgment be here rendered for appellant, Dixon.