Court Opinion

ID: 5501792
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 03:01:07.111968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:57.400504
License: Public Domain

Barnard, P. J.
This action is brought to foreclose mortgages on real property owned by the defendant Thomas Leary. The mortgages were acquired by the plaintiff by assignment from the Irving Savings Institution. The mortgages were on the property when Leary bought. The defendant Jessie Leary obtained an order to examine the plaintiff and her husband. The order was obtained before answer. The affidavit upon which the order was granted was sufficient under section 872 of the Code, subd. 4. Ho objection is made to the affidavit in any other respect than that no defense is proven to the action, and no sufficient facts and circumstances are established to justify an order for the examination. There is a defense shown, if true. Leary has conspired with the plaintiff to assert the validity of the mortgages which were acquired with Leary’s money for the purpose of cutting off the rights of his wife therein. If Howe merely holds the title to the mortgages by an assignment, when the same are paid in fact by the owner of the title, it will make a defense on the trial if proven. The husband is on ill terms with his wife; treats her with cruelty; is attempting to obtain her signature to a mortgage to cut off her dower. While he is of substantial means, he supports his wife and children with great meagerness. He threatens to cut off his wife and children froni his estate, so far as permitted by law. These facts and circumstances are sufficient to justify the order. The wife is entitled to know the particulars of the transaction so as to frame her answer. The rigid rule that, if a party do not actually know the facts which make the defense, nti order to examine can be granted, would render the section of the Code in question of little practical use. The section should have a broader scope. Where facts and circumstances are shown which justify an examination of a party, so that a pleading may be framed for the trial of the issue, the order should be granted. The notice of the defense, and the facts and circumstances to show ttiat an examination is material and necessary, are sufficiently stated, and the order should be affirmed, with costs.