Court Opinion

ID: 9702941
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 23:33:35.738958+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:12:17.149484
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion by
COLVILLE, J.:
¶ 1 Appellee’s challenge must fail because he did not retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the videos contained in the computer after delivering it to Circuit City. There being no reasonable expectation of privacy, I would not engage in the Majority’s plain view analysis. See Commonwealth v. Viall, 890 A.2d 419, 422 (Pa.Super.2005) (holding that a defendant cannot prevail in a challenge to the search and seizure of evidence if the defendant does not have a legally cognizable expectation of privacy in the property searched).
¶2 For these reasons, I concur in the result.