Court Opinion

ID: 9686795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 16:06:44.001285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:22.073939
License: Public Domain

Saad, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in *15part). I concur in the majority opinion with regard to Scott but I dissent from the majority’s decision to remand with regard to McCray for an evidentiary hearing concerning the propriety of the arrest and the delay in arraignment. Defendant McCray has not properly preserved these issues for appeal, and I am not convinced that manifest injustice resulted from the admission of McCray’s noncoerced inculpatory statement. People v Stimage, 202 Mich App 28, 29; 507 NW2d 778 (1993).