Court Opinion

ID: 9925328
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-19 15:03:54.759314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:59.566865
License: Public Domain

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                        STATE OF FLORIDA
                       _____________________________

                             Case No. 6D23-1412
                    Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CA-004420-O
                      _____________________________

 WILDE CYPRESS BRANCH, BOGGY BRANCH, CROSBY ISLAND MARSH, LAKE HART,
  LAKE MARY JANE, AND ALL OTHER AFFECTED ORANGE COUNTY WATERS; and
  CHARLES O’NEAL, as President of SPEAK UP WEKIVA, INC. ON BEHALF OF THE
                      WATERS OF ORANGE COUNTY,

                                   Appellants,

                                        v.

    EMILE D. “SHAWN” HAMILTON, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the
         FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, and
                   BEACHLINE SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC,

                                   Appellees.

                       _____________________________

                Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
                          Paetra T. Brownlee, Judge.

                                January 19, 2024

WOZNIAK, J.

      Appellants, Wilde Cypress Branch, Boggy Branch, Crosby Island Marsh,

Lake Hart, Lake Mary Jane, and All Other Affected Orange County Waters (“Waters

of Orange County”); and Charles O’Neal, as President of Speak Up Wekiva, Inc. on

behalf of Waters of Orange County, appeal the final order of dismissal rendered on
the motion of Appellees, Beachline South Residential, LLC and Shawn Hamilton, 1

in his official capacity as Secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental

Protection. 2 Appellants make several arguments for reversal of the trial court’s

order. We find no merit in the issues raised and affirm, but write to address

Appellants’ contention that the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that

section 403.412(9)(a), Florida Statutes (2020), is constitutional and preempts

Orange County Charter section 704.1.

      Because section 403.412(9)(a), Florida Statutes, precludes a “local

government regulation, ordinance, code, rule, comprehensive plan, charter, or any

other provision of law” from “recogniz[ing] or grant[ing] any legal rights to a plant,

an animal, a body of water, or any other part of the natural environment that is not a

person or political subdivision,” the Charter provision’s purported recognition of a

right held by water bodies within Orange County “to exist, Flow, to be protected

against Pollution and to maintain a healthy ecosystem,” 3 was correctly held to be in

conflict with the statute and preempted thereby. See Fla. Power Corp. v. Seminole

Cnty., 579 So. 2d 105, 107 (Fla. 1991) (“While the authority given to cities and

      1
        Emile D. “Shawn” Hamilton succeeded Noah Valenstein as Secretary of the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection during the course of this litigation.
Accordingly, we substitute Secretary Hamilton for Secretary Valenstein. See Fla.
R. Civ. P. 1.260(d).
      2
        This case was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeal to this
Court on January 1, 2023.
      3
        Art. VII, § 704.1(A)(1), Orange County, Fla., Charter (2020).
                                         2
counties in Florida is broad, both the constitution and statutes recognize that cities

and counties have no authority to act in areas that the legislature has preempted.”

(citations omitted)); Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Chase Fed. Hous. Corp., 737 So. 2d 494,

504 (Fla. 1999) (“If political subdivisions were able to continue actions to enforce

ordinances that conflict with general law, the political subdivisions would have the

power to frustrate the ability of the Legislature to set policies for the state.” (citation

omitted)). Without a cause of action under the Charter provision sued upon,

Appellants’ suit fails. Accordingly, we affirm.

       AFFIRMED.

STARGEL and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Roy D. Wasson, of Wasson & Associates, Chartered, Miami, and Steven M. Meyers,
of Meyers & Stanley, Maitland, for Appellants.

Judith M. Mercier and Jamie Billotte Moses, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Orlando,
Lawrence E. Sellers, Jr., of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tallahassee, and Daniel
Mahfood, of Holland & Knight LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee, Beachline South
Residential, LLC.

Justin G. Wolfe, General Counsel, and Jeffrey Brown, Complex Litigation Counsel,
of the Department of Environmental Protection, and Nicholas J. P. Meros, Deputy
General Counsel, of the Executive Office of The Governor, for Appellee, Emile D.
“Shawn” Hamilton, Secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection.

  NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
           AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

                                            3