Court Opinion

ID: 544918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:47:39.630732
License: Public Domain

908 F.2d 966Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Julius A. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Eric SOHR, In his own behalf;  Vanessa Holley, In her ownbehalf, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6791.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 4, 1990.Decided:  June 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-291-PN).
Julius A. Baxter, appellant pro se.
Gertrude Catherine Bartel, Aron Uri Raskas, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md.;    John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Julius A. Baxter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Baxter v. Sohr, C/A No. 89-291-PN (D.Md. Feb. 13, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.