Court Opinion

ID: 2837012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-02 21:47:56.133732+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:37.789431
License: Public Domain

Opinion October 28, 2004

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-04-00975-CR
____________

RENE SERNA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 959146

 
MEMORANDUM  OPINION
               We lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal.  The trial court sentenced appellant,
Rene Serna, and signed a final judgment in this case on June 21, 2004.  Serna did not
file a motion for new trial, and therefore the deadline for filing a notice of appeal was
July 21, 2004, 30 days after sentencing.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). 
               Serna’s pro se notice of appeal was deposited in the mail on July 22, 2004,
according to the postmark on the copy of the envelope included in the clerk’s record. 
Because the notice of appeal was mailed after the filing deadline, it did not comply
with Rule 9.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the “mailbox rule.”  See
Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b).  Although the notice of appeal was filed within the 15-day
time period for filing a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, no such
motion for extension of time was filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
               An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest the appellate court with
jurisdiction to hear the case.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Douglas
v. State, 987 S.W.2d 605, 605-06 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.).
               We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes and Alcala.
Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).