Court Opinion

ID: 6145740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:25:31.328831+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:51.372814
License: Public Domain

But the Court of Errors held, (Kent, Chancellor, delivering the opinion of the court,) 1. That the Indians within the state of New York were not even quasi citizens, but are distinct tribes or nations, permitted to live in the state, and under its protection.
2. That a patent of land to J. S., an Oneida Indian, and to his heirs and assigns forever, is to him and his Indian heirs, whatever their civil condition or character may be, whether aliens or citizens, and that such a patent is to be taken as issued by due authority, and as equivalent to a legislative grant to J. S., and his Indian heirs.
3. That a deed executed in 1797, by the son and heir of such an Indian patentee of land, to a citizen in the usual form, without the assent of the legislature, was illegal and void, before the act of 1801.
Judgment of reversal.
SCr* S. P. in Lee v. Glover, 8 Cow. 189, where the deed *232was held void, whether the Indian grantor reside with his tribe or not, if he reside in the state; and that, being void, no act of disaffirmance was necessary to render it invalid and unavailable to the grantee. Also held, that a patent from the people does not alter the rights or disabilities of the parties.