Court Opinion

ID: 537995
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:08.133537
License: Public Domain

898 F.2d 144Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James Arthur DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Kathleen S. GREEN, Acting Warden;  Thomas Kimball, ActingAssistant Warden;  R. Wilson, Captain;  LieutenantHolly, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7736.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Oct. 18, 1989.Decided:  Feb. 21, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Daniel E. Klein, Jr., United States Magistrate.  (C/A No. 88-3742-JH)
James Arthur Davis, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General;  Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
James Arthur Davis appeals the magistrate's report and recommendation that judgment be entered against him in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

2
Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders.  A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties.  It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment."   Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).

3
As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.  The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292.  Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

4
Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.  We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.

5
DISMISSED.