Court Opinion

ID: 2662440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-03 12:19:58.250495+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:59:09.971312
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                              MAY 11 2012
                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy
                                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA                          Courts for the District of Columbia

KEVIN T. GIVENS,                              )
                                              )
                        Petitioner,           )
                V.                            )       Civil Action No.     12 0756
                                              )
LOFTNESS, Warden,                             )
                                              )
                       Respondent.            )

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

        This matter is before the Court on the petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis and

his prose Petition Pursuant to the All Writs Act and/or Petition Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The

Court will grant the application and dismiss the petition.

        Petitioner alleges that he erroneously "was designated [an] Armed Career Criminal," Pet. at 2,

"[e]ven though the offenses are separate in time," a "single court proceeding encompassed all of the

offenses, and the sentences were all concurrent to each other." Id. at 5. He claims to be "actually

innocent of the Armed Career Offender status," id., such that the sentencing court imposed a sentence of

"200 months in prison for an offense that had a maximum sentence of 120 months," id. at 4. Petitioner

requests "relief in the form of resentencing to the appropriate sentence." !d. at 1.

        The Court construes the petition as a challenge to the legality of the criminal sentence. A

challenge of this nature must be presented to the sentencing court in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

See Ojo v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 106 F.3d 680,683 (5th Cir. 1997). Section 2255

provides specifically that:

               [a] prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of
               Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the
               sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the

                                                                                                                             3
               United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such
               sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by
               law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which
               imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (emphasis added). This Court did not impose petitioner's sentence, and, therefore,

it lacks authority to vacate or correct it. 1 Accordingly, the petition will be denied without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

                                                       United States District Judge

        A PACER search reveals that petitioner was tried, convicted and sentenced in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Missouri. See Judgment in a Criminal Case, United States v.
Givens, No. 4:04-cr-.039 (W.D. Mo. filed June 28, 2005).