Court Opinion

ID: 9939223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:07:54.29852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:06.491112
License: Public Domain

ON RETURN TO REMAND
We remanded this case for a review by the trial court applying the principles of Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala. 1987), and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712,90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial court meticulously applied theBranch guidelines and carefully ascertained the reasons given for each peremptory strike. We are reasonably satisfied that there were race-neutral reasons for each strike. We find no error, but, rather, a full compliance with the rule in Batson.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur. *Page 119