Court Opinion

ID: 9768715
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 13:45:54.739053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:43.824663
License: Public Domain

David Newbern, Justice, concurring. The majority opinion is correct. I agree with all of it, and I write only to make clear that the problem here was caused by the erroneous determination that Ms. Kossman was not the real party in interest. The real party in interest is the one who can discharge the claim. Gladden v. Bucy, 299 Ark. 523, 722 S.W.2d 612 (1989); House v. Long, 244 Ark. 718, 426 S.W.2d 814 (1968). That was Ms. Kossman. Summerhill v. Shannon, 235 Ark. 617, 361 S.W.2d 271 (1962).