Court Opinion

ID: 9381240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-22 15:03:51.513624+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:30.590388
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                                State of Florida

                         Opinion filed March 22, 2023.
        Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                             ________________

                              No. 3D22-0850
                      Lower Tribunal No. 19-13416 CC
                            ________________

                         Louis Carambot, et al.,
                                  Appellants,

                                      vs.

                          Lizet Moncion, et al.,
                                  Appellees.

     An appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Chiaka
Ihekwaba, Judge.

     Victor K. Rones, P.A. and Victor K. Rones, for appellants.

     No appearance for appellees. 1

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and MILLER, JJ.

1
  By order of the court, appellees were precluded from filing an answer brief
for failure to timely file same.
      MILLER, J.

      In this landlord-tenant dispute, appellants challenge an amended final

judgment rendered following a nonjury trial. In the judgment, the trial court

denied their motion for attorney’s fees and costs, ostensibly on the basis they

were not prevailing parties because their recovery was limited to the

negligible amount of claimed damages conceded by appellees at the trial.

Given the broad discretion afforded to the trial court in determining which

party prevailed on the significant issues in the litigation, we decline to disturb

the denial of fees. See Skylink Jets, Inc. v. Klukan, 308 So. 3d 1048, 1051

(Fla. 4th DCA 2020); Sidlow v. Bowles Custom Pool & Spas, Inc., 32 So. 3d

722, 722 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Prosperi v. Code, Inc., 626 So. 2d 1360, 1363

(Fla. 1993). An award of costs, however, was required because appellants

recovered judgment.       See § 57.041(1), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The party

recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges

which shall be included in the judgment . . . .”); Arellano v. Bisson, 761 So.

2d 365, 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (noting that, under section 57.041, Florida

Statutes, entitlement to costs “is conditioned solely on recovering a

judgment”); Governing Bd. of St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Lake

Pickett Ltd., 543 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (“[S]ection 57.041

mandates that every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is

                                        2
entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs and that a trial judge

has no discretion under that statute to deny court costs to the party

recovering judgment.”); First Protective Ins. Co. v. Featherston, 978 So. 2d

881, 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (same). Accordingly, we reverse and remand

for further proceedings.

      Reversed and remanded.

                                        3