Court Opinion

ID: 9611488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 03:57:19.265118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:14.566598
License: Public Domain

BRYSON, J.,
specially concurring.
I concur in the majority opinion because I dissented in Wiener v. Gamma Phi, ATO Frat., 258 Or 632, 644, 485 P2d 18 (1971). I believe we should overrule Wiener rather than distinguish that case from the one at bar.
The complaint in Wiener alleged that defendants knew that minors, including Blair, a minor and driver of the car, would be attending the party and would be served intoxicating beverages; that Kienow, a member of the defendant fraternity, knew of the party and of the minors attending when he delivered the alcoholic beverages to the Country Squire Recreation Ranch to be consumed by minors, including Blair. I fail to distinguish any difference between the facts of the two cases.