Court Opinion

ID: 1004135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:48.261301+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:30.687607
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7713

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-00-777)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     John Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying re-

lief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion

for reconsideration.   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s orders and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we af-

firm on the reasoning of the district court.    Johnson v. Brooks,

No. CA-00-777 (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 22, 2000).   We grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2