Court Opinion

ID: 8608283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 05:34:16.01952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.392642
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s fourth motion to reconsider as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (stating numerical limits on motions to reconsider); Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 895-96 (9th Cir.2003).
Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.