Court Opinion

ID: 2932292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:55:13.454295+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:40:00.463684
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 1, 2006

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 1, 2006.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-05-01080-CR
____________
 
KENNY EARL CALLIHAM,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 180th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
950,522
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant was charged with capital murder.  He entered a plea of nolo contendere to the
lesser offense of aggravated robbery and the trial court deferred adjudication
of guilt.  Appellant was placed under
community supervision for a period of ten years.  Subsequently, the State filed a motion to
adjudicate guilt.  The trial court found
the allegations in the motion to be true and found appellant guilty of
aggravated robbery.  The trial court
sentenced appellant to confinement for forty-five years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of
$1,500.  Appellant filed a notice of
appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed June 1, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson,
Fowler, and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).