Court Opinion

ID: 993982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:15:53.567162+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:37.152564
License: Public Domain

Filed:    January 13, 1998

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-1894
                          (CA-97-224-5-BR-2)

Monika Gonzalez,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

           versus

James Askins, etc., et al,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

                              O R D E R

    The Court amends its opinion filed November 7, 1997, as

follows:
    On the cover sheet, section 6 -- The status line is corrected

to read "Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion."

                                       For the Court - By Direction

                                          /s/ Patricia S. Connor

                                                      Clerk
                            UNPUBLISHED
                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-1894

MONIKA GONZALEZ,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES ASKINS, Dr.; STANLEY K. GILBERT, Dr.;
WILLIAM S. BRITT,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh.     W. Earl Britt, District
Judge. (CA-97-224-5-BR-2)

Submitted:   October 20, 1997             Decided:   November 7, 1997

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monika Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

                                 2
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434
U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.
220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judg-

ments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions
to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
     The district court entered its order and judgment on April 23,

1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 8, 1997, which

is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note

a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appel-

lant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  3