Court Opinion

ID: 3930583
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:56:00.058264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:03.001876
License: Public Domain

Appellant was convicted for operating an automobile on a public road in said county at a greater rate of speed than eighteen miles per hour.
The statute is, no automobile shall be driven or operated upon any public road at a greater rate of speed than eighteen miles an hour. (P.C., art. 815.)
There are but two questions necessary to be passed upon. The first, appellant claimed the evidence was insufficient to identify him as the party who operated the machine at the time and upon which this prosecution was based. We have read the evidence carefully and in our opinion the evidence was amply sufficient to show this. The other question is, appellant claims that there was no proof showing that the road upon which the automobile was run was a public road. As stated, we have carefully read the evidence. In our opinion the evidence is insufficient to show that it was a public road. Judge White, in section 796 of his Penal Code, correctly states how a road can be shown to be a public road and cites the cases.
Because the evidence does not establish that the automobile was operated upon a public road, this case must be reversed and remanded.
Reversed and remanded.