Court Opinion

ID: 992905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:59:29.953101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:47:45.656111
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6808

LANDON FUNDERBURK,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden; MARK HENRY;
ED CROSLEY,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-97-234-5-F)

Submitted:   August 14, 1997              Decided:   August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funderburk v. Reno,

No. CA-97-234-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 21, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

       *
         Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

                                2