Court Opinion

ID: 9805446
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 17:55:29.422575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:45:13.196165
License: Public Domain

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.
¶ 42. (concurring).
The instant case is part of a trilogy of cases examining the constitutionality of warrantless, nonconsensual blood draws performed on persons suspected of driving under the influence of an intoxicant in light of *481Missouri v. McNeely, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013). The other two cases in this trilogy are State v. Tullberg, 2014 WI 134, 359 Wis. 2d 421, 857 N.W.2d 120, and State v. Foster, 2014 WI 131, 360 Wis. 2d 12, 856 N.W.2d 847. For a discussion of these three opinions, including the instant case, and the issues arising therein, see my dissenting opinion in State v. Foster, 2014 WI 131, 360 Wis. 2d 12, 856 N.W.2d 847.