Court Opinion

ID: 8680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 05:39:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:03.026932
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                         _______________________
                              No. 95-20345
                            Summary Calendar
                         _______________________

CAROLYN W. BOYD, Pro Se,
                                                        Plaintiff-Appellant,
                                     versus
CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS and CITY
OF HOUSTON PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT,
                                                            Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                             (CA-H-94-2)
_________________________________________________________________
                               February 14, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
          The     judgment    of   the   district   court    is   affirmed   for
essentially the reasons stated in its orders entered June 3, 1994 and
April 25, 1995.     In addition, we note Boyd’s failure to comply with
this court’s briefing Rule 28.2.3, requiring page references to the
district court record.       Boyd’s inattention to this briefing rule alone
would have justified rejection of her appeal.        Moore v. FDIC, 993 F.2d
106 (5th Cir. 1993).     Further, Boyd’s brief is devoid of a coherent
legal argument for overturning the summary judgment.

    *
       Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the
limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
AFFIRMED.

            -2-