Court Opinion

ID: 8353719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-18 00:02:42.827286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:53.208665
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651; In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St., 171, 98 *490N. E. (2d), 11 In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Stewart, 156 Ohio St., 521, 103 N. E. (2d), 551.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.