Court Opinion

ID: 7808687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:09:46.9983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:24.254459
License: Public Domain

Humphreys, J. On the 17th day of June, 1911, appellants bought lots 4 and 5, in block 2 of Borden’s addition to the town of Neelyville, Missouri, from C. W. Jones, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of J. M. Hawks. These lots were included with other property in a mortgage given prior to this time by the bankrupt, J. M. Hawks, to Allen-West Commission Company, to secure a large indebtedness' owed by Hawks to said commission company. In the bankrupt proceedings, other creditors had attacked the validity of said mortgage, and by consent of Allen-West Commission Co., the bankruptcy court ordered the lots sold and the proceeds deposited with the clerk subject to the order of the court. The sale was made, reported and confirmed. Appellants took possession of said lots and collected the rents until the building burned, at which time they collected $1,600.00 insurance. Appellants executed notes for the unpaid purchase money and the last note so executed is the basis of this action. At the time of the sale, the trustee stated the lots were being sold free from incumbrance. After the indebtedness became due, he tendered a trustee’s deed and release to appellants and demanded payment of said note. Appellants objected to the form of the release by Allen-West Commission Company, and declined to accept the deed and pay the note. C. W. Jones died and T. J. Crowder was appointed trustee of J. M. Hawks, bankrupt. He offered to make a deed and give a release to appellants, who declined to carry out the contract. Thereupon, he instituted this suit and in the complaint tendered a trustee’s deed to appellants for said real estate. Appellee obtained a judgment on the note; proper steps were taken and the cause is here on appeal. Appellants contend that the judgment should be reversed because appellee never tendered a release sufficient in form from Allen-West Commission Company. In support of this contention sections 2844 to 2851, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1909, describing the method by which mortgages and deeds of trust are released in Missouri, are cited by appellant. These statutes have no application to the facts in this ease, for under appellant’s own evidence, no contract or promise was made by the trustee at the time of the sale to have Allen-West Commission Company release its mortgage in accordance with the statutory form required in Missouri. The order of sale gave the trustee no such authority. The statement made by him at the time of the sale was that the property was being sold free of encumbrance. The sale was made at the instance of the creditors of the bankrupt by and with the consent of the mortgagee, Allen-West Commission Company. In bankruptcy proceedings, the court and referee may, in proper cases, order the property of the bankrupt sold “free and clear from mortgages or other liens, and preserve such liens by transferring them to the funds which are the proceeds of the sale.” 5 Cyc. 383, and cases cited in support of the text. The mortgagee consented that this should be done, and therefore waived all right under the mortgage to his lien. The mortgagee’s lien was as effectively wiped out by this sale as if it had been sold under the mortgage. No release, therefore, was necessary. An objection is made that the deed was not tendered until after this suit was instituted. We do not so understand the facts. Jones, as trustee, tendered a deed in his lifetime. Appellee, as trustee, tendered both a deed and release, to which no objection was made on account of form, but refused because appellants had decided not to carry out the contract. Appellee offered in his complaint to make a deed. No authorities are cited in support of the contentions made by appellant for reversal of the judgment, nor do the record facts support the contentions advanced. Under the undisputed evidence in the case, the court was correct in instructing a verdict on the note. The judgment is affirmed.