Court Opinion

ID: 9382019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-24 16:04:50.729313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:36.614450
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISl'ANA
          COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
KARLA BURGESS                                     NO.   2022 CW 1381
VERSUS
STEVEN E. WARD AND
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, GEICO
INSURANCE COMPANY, SALLY                           MARCH 24, 2023
GORDON, AND USAA INSURANCE

In Re:      United  Services  Automobile  Association  and  Sally
            Gordon, applying for supervis9ry writs, 19th Judicial
            District Court,   Parish of East Baton Rouge,     No.
            683067.

BEFORE:     McCLENDON, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.

      WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the November 22,
2022 judgment of the trial court ordering defendants, United
Services Automobile Association and Sally Gordon, to accept the
authorization     and   disclosure    and   use   forms   submitted   by
plaintiff, Karla Burgess, as edited or provide authorization and
disclosure and use forms that are prepared specifically for
additional medical examination purposes only,             and not for
treatment purposes,       and that limits the authorization and
disclosure and use to purposes appropriate for an additional
medical examination, is reversed. Once the court finds that the
party seeking an additional medical examination has established
good cause     for    same,   the court should presume that          the
examination will be conducted in a reasonable manner.            If the
opposing party seeks to have restrictions placed on said
examination,    the burden shifts to that party to establish
special    circumstances     justifying    the   imposition   of    said
restrictions.     In meeting this burden, one may not rely on mere
allegations    or    speculation,    but   should    produce  competent
evidence establishing the need for the restrictions and the harm
which could result without same. We find that plaintiff failed
to    produce    competent    evidence    establishing    a  need    for
restrictions on her completion of the forms required for the
additional medical examination and what harm might result if
such restrictions were not imposed. See Augustine v. Safeco
Insurance Company of Oregon,         2021-01753 (La. 10/21/22), 351
So. 3d 353.     Accordingly, we order plaintiff to complete Dr.
Robert's forms as provided, without any edits, changes, or
additions.

                                  PMc
                                  AHP
                                  WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

         o\.C J)
    DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
        FOR THE COURT