Court Opinion

ID: 2541451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:16:58.588046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:09.565531
License: Public Domain

360 S.W.3d 303 (2012)
Tarell ADAMS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96382.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
January 17, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 23, 2012.
Andrew E. Zleit, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
*304 Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Tarell Adams, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).