Court Opinion

ID: 1006360
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:10:15.303795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:27.821310
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7263

DANIEL SCOTT HARNEY,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-
1008-MJG)

Submitted:   December 26, 2001            Decided:   January 15, 2002

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Scott Harney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Daniel Scott Harney seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. Harney v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1008-MJG

(D. Md. filed July 18, 2001 & entered July 20, 2001).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2