Court Opinion

ID: 669791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:32:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:20.159832
License: Public Domain

23 F.3d 1497
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
May 4, 1994.

J. Frank McCabe, Goorjian & McCabe, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Pitner.
Juliana Drous, Tamburello, Hanlon & Brescianai, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant David Hanson.
Eric J. Swenson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before:  HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* Senior District Judge.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Supreme Court's decision in Pitner v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), and Hanson v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), we hereby withdraw the opinion, see 979 F.2d 156 (9th Cir.1993), and unpublished memorandum, see Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318 (9th Cir.  Nov. 2, 1992), in the above-captioned cases.
Further, we reverse and remand the appellants' cases for a new trial consistent with Ratzlaf v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).
REVERSED and REMANDED.

*
 The Honorable James M. Burns, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation