Court Opinion

ID: 992483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:52:39.608988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:51.620850
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6986

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RANDALL BRICE HARRIS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-12-P)

Submitted:   June 19, 1997                 Decided:   June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-

tion for modification of his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Harris, No. CR-94-12-P (W.D.N.C. May 30,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2