Court Opinion

ID: 2926833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:39:50.865651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:02.892053
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00721-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
MIRTA ZORILLA, 	Appellant,

v.

THE HOMEOWNERS OF PLAZAS 
DEL LAGO, INC., ET AL.,	Appellees. 
	____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 

	The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on April 24, 2009.  On May 14, 
2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been
received from appellant.  
	Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 18th day of June, 2009.