Court Opinion

ID: 5976638
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:58:07.154428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:44.242009
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered April 1, 2013. The order denied the motion of defendants to vacate a default judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them. We note that defendants’ contention that the default was prematurely entered during a 30-day stay within which defendants were to obtain new counsel was raised for the first time in their reply papers in Supreme Court, and thus that contention was not properly before the court (see Mikulski v Battaglia, 112 AD3d 1355, 1356 [2013]; Zolfaghari v Hughes Network Sys., LLC, 99 AD3d 1234, 1235 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 861 [2013]; Dannasch v Bifulco, 184 AD2d 415, 417 [1992]). We reject defendants’ further contention that the court abused its discretion in denying their motion on the grounds that they failed to offer a reasonable excuse for missing a court conference and failed to establish a meritorious defense in their initial motion papers. <£[E]ven assuming that [defendants’] nonappearance at the conference was excusable . . . , [we conclude that] their belated attempt in reply papers to establish a meritorious defense was inadequate” (Contractors Cas. & Sur. Co. v 535 Broadhollow Realty, 276 AD2d 737, 738 [2000]).
Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.