Court Opinion

ID: 569573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:48.258751
License: Public Domain

946 F.2d 886
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Craig E. REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Stephen SPROUSE, Correctional Officer;  Larry H. Huffman,Warden, Augusta Correctional Center;  W.P. Rogers,Regional Administrator, VirginiaDepartment of Corrections,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7130.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.Decided Oct. 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-90-497-R)
Craig E. Reynolds, appellant pro se.
Gayl Y. Branum-Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Craig E. Reynolds appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Reynolds v. Sprouse, No. CA-90-497-R (W.D.Va. May 6, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.