Court Opinion

ID: 4443748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-03 05:19:43.985861+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:07.248023
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                            OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-90,363-01

                     EX PARTE MICHAEL UNDREA JOHNSON, Applicant

                   ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. CR14-00177A IN THE 294TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM VAN ZANDT COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to

driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal

his conviction.

        Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

resulting in an unknowing and involuntary plea. Applicant alleges that trial counsel advised him that

        1
            This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
                                                                                                       2

the State would not likely make an offer for probation, but that if Applicant paid counsel an

additional $10,000, he would get probation from the trial court. Applicant alleges that he paid

counsel the additional $10,000 but was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Specifically, trial counsel shall state what advice, if any, he provided to Applicant with regard to his

options for pleading pursuant to an agreement, entering an open plea, or going to trial on the charges.

Trial counsel shall state whether there were any plea offers extended by the State, and if there were,

whether they were communicated to Applicant. Trial counsel shall state whether he made any

promise or guarantee of probation to Applicant if Applicant paid him additional money. The trial

court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall first supplement the habeas record with copies of all documents relevant

to Applicant’s plea, including any written plea offers, written admonishments, waivers and

stipulations, pre-trial motions and orders, notice of enhancements not included in the indictment, at

transcript of the plea and punishment proceedings, and the trial court’s certification of Applicant’s

right to appeal. The trial court shall then make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether
                                                                                                      3

the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of

law as to whether Applicant’s open plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. The trial

court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and

appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 2, 2019
Do not publish