Court Opinion

ID: 9767820
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:28:59.993364+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:33.308768
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
On motion for rehearing appellant calls our attention to the fact that in discussing special issue number 19 we attributed to Mr. Tilley’s testimony that the firewall around the north or Woodward tank battery was torn down in exchanging tanks within the battery when in truth and in- fact the testimony referred to was directed to the Thomas or south tank battery. We have examined the record and find that appellant’s contention in this respect is well tak*732en. However, we remain of the opinion that the evidence in the case supports the finding of the jury in answer to special issue number 19 and that the court did not err in overruling appellant’s objections thereto and in overruling his motion for an instructed verdict
Appellants motion for a rehearing is overruled.