Court Opinion

ID: 4567249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-21 07:15:29.709003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:30.747744
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-21,310-05

                          EX PARTE RICHARD GROSS, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 32004-A IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment.

The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gross v. State, No. 12-15-00280-CR (Tex.

App.—Tyler July 20, 2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a

writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends in three grounds that Mark Cargill, trial and appellate counsel, was

ineffective. On July 15, 2020, the habeas judge entered a timely order designating issues.1 The

       1
         The following day, the habeas judge signed an order of recusal and requested that the
Presiding Administrative Judge assign a judge to this proceeding.
                                                                                                 2

district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before findings of fact and

conclusions of law were made. We remand this application so the habeas judge who is assigned to

this proceeding can complete an evidentiary investigation and make findings and conclusions.

       The habeas judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the habeas

judge’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other

things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts

from hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be

requested by the habeas judge and obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish