Court Opinion

ID: 3087806
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:15:30.229244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:38.147928
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00047-CV

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                       CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

HR MECHANICAL, LLC,                                                              APPELLANT,

                                                v.

KRR1 CONSTRUCTION, LLC,                           APPELLEE.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 60th District Court
                  of Jefferson County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, HR Mechanical, LLC, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by

the 60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, in cause number B-184,607.1 This

appeal was abated by this Court on February 27, 2013, and the parties were ordered to

1
 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a
docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West 2005).
mediation. This cause is now before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on

grounds that the case settled at mediation. The parties request that this Court dismiss

the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby REINSTATED.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.             In

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
31st day of Octoebr, 2013.

                                            2