Court Opinion

ID: 3567924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:17:28.095391+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:03.487457
License: Public Domain

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 92