Court Opinion

ID: 2964403
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:25:08.311367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:07.624265
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1103

                                MAUREEN F. FRECHETTE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                 PAUL RUANE, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                      [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Maureen F. Frechette on brief pro se.
            ____________________
            Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and  Marci
            __________________                                           _____
        R. Gelb, Counsel, Department of Correction, on brief for appellee.
        _______

                                 ____________________

                                   DECEMBER 3, 1996
                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.    Upon a careful review of  the issues
                      __________

            and arguments in the parties' briefs and the record presented

            on appeal,  the judgment of  the district court  is affirmed.
                                                                ________

            See Loc. R. 27.1.
            ___

                                         -2-