Court Opinion

ID: 4558106
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-24 07:15:47.74483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:50.592879
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                            NOS. WR-88,349-03 AND WR-88,349-04

                       EX PARTE JEREMY CHAD BRAUN, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NOS. W-069062-B-02-WR AND W-069063-B-02-WR
                           IN THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM POTTER COUNTY

         Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

         Applicant was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon in the -03 case, and

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in a drug free zone in the -04 case. He was

sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment in the -03 case, and seventy years’ imprisonment in the -04

case, to run consecutively. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Braun v. State,

Nos. 07-15-00351-CR and 07-15-00352-CR (Tex. App. — Amarillo Aug. 11, 2017) (not designated

for publication). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07.
                                                                                                       2

        Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to seek dismissal

of the -04 charges on the basis that the indictment was not timely, failed to challenge the grand jury

process, failed to consult with and present testimony from a civil engineer or licensed surveyor to

show that Applicant did not possess the drugs within 1,000 feet of a playground, failed to challenge

the qualifications or methodology of the police officer who testified that Applicant’s residence was

within 1,000 feet of the playground, and failed to object to Applicant’s sentences in both cases as

being disproportionate to the gravity of the offenses based on the facts presented at trial.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. Specifically, trial counsel shall state when he was retained

or appointed to represent Applicant, and whether the indictments in either or both cases had been

returned at that time. If Applicant had not yet been indicted in the -04 case at the time trial counsel

was retained or appointed, trial counsel shall state whether he considered filing a motion to dismiss

the prosecution for failure to timely indict, pursuant to Article 32.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. Trial counsel shall state whether he believed that there existed any basis upon which to

challenge the grand jury proceedings in either case. Trial counsel shall state whether he considered

using an expert to challenge the drug free zone allegation, and whether he challenged the

qualifications of or the methods used by the police officer who testified at trial that the location

where the drugs were found was within 1,000 feet of a playground. Finally, trial counsel shall state

whether he considered objecting to the sentences assessed by the jury on the basis that they were

disproportionate to the gravity of the offenses for which Applicant was on trial.
                                                                                                       3

        In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 19, 2020
Do not publish