Court Opinion

ID: 1002679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:14:21.834733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:23.298519
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6732

ROBERT JACK WRIGHT,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Cor-
rectional Center,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-33-3)

Submitted:   September 14, 2000           Decided:   October 2, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Jack Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Leah
Perry Macia, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert Jack Wright appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.     See Wright v. Haines, No. CA-99-33-3

(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2