Court Opinion

ID: 1014165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:12:08.550336+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:18.894986
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Richard Enriquez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to clarify the court’s intention as to the concurrent nature of his sentence.
  
   *
  
  We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Enriquez,
  
  No. CR-97-173-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED
  

   *
  

   Contrary to the government’s assertion, Enri-quez timely filed his notice of appeal.
   
    See
   
   Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), 26(a)(2).