Court Opinion

ID: 7188400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:54:34.935047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:07.782163
License: Public Domain

Howe, J.
P. A. Boyle & Co., ordinary creditors of Isaac P. Sibley, deceased, fried an opposition to the account of tlie administratrix. Several grounds of opposition, were maintained by the court below, and as the administratrix has not appealed, or asked for an amendment of the judgment, we can not pass upon them.
The principal question before us is of the right of the administratrix, Mrs. Sibley, as usufructuary of the property of the community, which existed between her and the deceased.
Isaac P. Sibley died in 1861, leaving a plantation, with slaves^ work animals, utensils, etc., the property of the community. Mrs. Sibley, the surviving spouse, was appointed administratrix, and at the same time was entitled to the usufruct, during her widowhood, of this estate. She remained upon it until it was finally sold at succession sale in the latter part of 1867.
The opponents insist that she should charge herself in account with the revenues of the property during these six years. We are of opinion, however, that she was entitled to them as usufructuary. The fact that she was administratrix did not affect her rights as surviving spouse. 4 An. 389; 3 An. 489 ; 9 An. 107.
If the creditors wished to prevent her receiving tneso revenues they hould have pressed their claims, and compelled a sale at an earlier day.
Por the same reason she ought not to he charged with the value of the animals, tools and furniture, which perished by natural canses and use during this time. Tutorship of Davis, lately decided, 22 An. p. —.
On the whole, we think the judgment appealed from substantially correct.
Judgment affirmed.