Court Opinion

ID: 9941970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-20 11:09:34.441181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:33.130372
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                     JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2024

                                    NO. 03-23-00343-CR

                               Brian Grady Miller, Appellant

                                               v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

    APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY
        REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction.    Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s

judgment of conviction and remands the case for a new punishment hearing at which the

trial court will orally pronounce its sentence and sign a new written judgment comporting with

that pronouncement. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                     JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2024

                                    NO. 03-23-00344-CR

                               Brian Grady Miller, Appellant

                                               v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

    APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY
        REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction.    Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s

judgment of conviction and remands the case for a new punishment hearing at which the

trial court will orally pronounce its sentence and sign a new written judgment comporting with

that pronouncement. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                     JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2024

                                    NO. 03-23-00345-CR

                               Brian Grady Miller, Appellant

                                               v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

    APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY
        REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction.    Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s

judgment of conviction and remands the case for a new punishment hearing at which the

trial court will orally pronounce its sentence and sign a new written judgment comporting with

that pronouncement. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                     JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2024

                                    NO. 03-23-00346-CR

                               Brian Grady Miller, Appellant

                                               v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

    APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY
        REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction.    Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s

judgment of conviction and remands the case for a new punishment hearing at which the

trial court will orally pronounce its sentence and sign a new written judgment comporting with

that pronouncement. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                     JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2024

                                    NO. 03-23-00347-CR

                               Brian Grady Miller, Appellant

                                               v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

    APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY
        REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction.    Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s

judgment of conviction and remands the case for a new punishment hearing at which the

trial court will orally pronounce its sentence and sign a new written judgment comporting with

that pronouncement. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.