Court Opinion

ID: 5503809
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 03:04:54.83258+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:00.081236
License: Public Domain

BARNARD, P. J.
James McLean died in 1890, leaving a last will. By this will, after giving certain money legacies to one of his sons and to John Ordig and to James L. Wallace, and after creating a trust for a grandchild for 15,000, he gave all the remainder of his estate, real and personal, to his executors. The executors were to retain the estate as trustees, and to apply the half income thereof to each of his two sons, Cornelius and George H. McLean, during his natural life. At the end of the life estate of-each, the one half of the estate was to be paid over to the then living issue: There was a power of appointment given each son to will a certain portion of his share of the estate. The two sons survived the testator. The plaintiff- brought this action for a partition of the real property of deceased. The answer of the other son sets up the will, and it was proven in the case. The plaintiff has no legal title in the estate. .He is simply a beneficiary for life in one half thereof, the legal title being in the executors. The trust was one of the express trusts authorized by statute. 1 Rev. St. p. 728, § 55.1 The complaint was properly dismissed, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

 1 Rev. St. p. 728,§ 55,provides: “Express trusts may be created for any or either of the following purposes: * * * (3) To receive the rents and profits of lands, and apply them to the use of any person, during the life of such person, or for any shorter term, subject to the rules prescribed in the first article of this title.”