Court Opinion

ID: 5787749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:03:43.165971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:09.723958
License: Public Domain

On May 29, 2004 the injured plaintiff William C. Morrison, Sr., was standing on the open tailgate of a pickup truck and discarding unwanted household items into a pit located at the City of Poughkeepsie Transfer Station (hereinafter the Transfer Station). He allegedly was injured when, in the process of unloading a wooden door, he lost his balance and fell into the pit. He and his wife, derivatively, commenced this action against *732the defendants, City of Poughkeepsie and Department of Public Works of the City of Poughkeepsie. The Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We reverse.
The defendants submitted evidence sufficient to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). The evidence established that the Transfer Station had been constructed in accordance with existing law. Moreover, the alleged negligence of the defendants in failing to provide a guardrail around the unloading platform was not a proximate cause of the injured plaintiffs accident (see Plowden v Stevens Partners, LLC, 45 AD3d 659 [2007]; Tutunjian v Cove Landing on Sound Homeowners Assn., Inc., 38 AD3d 531 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Miller and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.