Court Opinion

ID: 9659320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 21:40:21.553522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:06.312919
License: Public Domain

Hendry, C.J.,
concurring.
I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion; however, I write separately because of a concern relating to the issue of whether CCC exercised reasonable care in patrolling the area around the ice machine.
The only issue on further review in this case is whether CCC created the condition which caused Derr’s injury. The Court of Appeals held that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether CCC had actual notice of the condition or would have discovered the condition through the exercise of rea*545sonable care, and neither party questioned this determination. Thus, the majority’s discussion regarding the sufficiency of CCC’s patrolling efforts is not necessary to resolve the issue presented in this case.