Court Opinion

ID: 674856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:55:23+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:34.537234
License: Public Domain

30 F.3d 132
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James G. WALLACE, Petitioner Appellant,v.William SMITH;  Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland,Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6310.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 28, 1994.Decided:  July 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-3009-HAR)
James G. Wallace, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Wallace v. Smith, No. CA-93-3009-HAR (D. Md. Mar. 16, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel