Court Opinion

ID: 994540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:21.925812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:23.066126
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7615

CARL TOWNES,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CORREC-
TIONAL OFFICER MEREDITH,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-495-AM)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 25, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Townes, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Townes
v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-96-495-AM (E.D. Va. Oct.

24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2