Court Opinion

ID: 5806862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:39:01.344359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:44.469894
License: Public Domain

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The defendant and his attorney were personally served with the statement as to the predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21. Upon sentence counsel for the defendant by a statement to the court indicated that he was fully informed of the facts concerning the prior felony conviction and his only objection to the sentencing of defendant as a second felony offender was his contention that the predicate felony statute is unconstitutional. In these circumstances there was substantial compliance with the statute, CPL 400.21 (subd 3). (See People v McClain, 35 NY2d 483; People v Carter, 31 NY2d 964; People v Bryant, 47 AD2d 51, 63.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court convicting defendant of attempted burglary, third degree.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.