Court Opinion

ID: 9948707
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-07 19:01:32.757182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:48.236327
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40588           Document: 45-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/07/2024

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                  ____________                                     FILED
                                                                               March 7, 2024
                                   No. 23-40588                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Summary Calendar                                  Clerk
                                 ____________

United States of America,

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                         versus

Leopoldo Martinez-Rubio,

                                           Defendant—Appellant.
                  ______________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 1:23-CR-323-1
                  ______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leopoldo
Martinez-Rubio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Rubio has not filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

      _____________________
      *
          This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40588      Document: 45-1     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/07/2024

                              No. 23-40588

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                   2