Court Opinion

ID: 2691713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:09:35.826272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:57:46.498444
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Satterfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 474, 2010-Ohio-725.]

           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SATTERFIELD, APPELLANT.
          [Cite as State v. Satterfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 474, 2010-Ohio-725.]
Court of appeals’ judgment reversed in part on the authority of State v. Singleton.
   (No. 2008-1424 — Submitted January 13, 2010 — Decided March 4, 2010.)
               APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County,
                              Nos. C-070414 and C-070415.
                                   __________________
          {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of
appeals’ holding on the retrospective application of H.B. 137 on the authority of
State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958. R.C.
2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.
          MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ.,
concur.
          LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in
the dissenting opinion of LANZINGER, J., in State v. Singleton.
                                   __________________
          Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E.
Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
          Roger W. Kirk, for appellant.
                                ______________________