Court Opinion

ID: 5084499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 13:35:08.873468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:21.857725
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of stealing over $150.00, § 570.030.3(1), RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a thirteen year prison term. He also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).