Court Opinion

ID: 2545655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:18:30.988745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:53.925683
License: Public Domain

362 S.W.3d 487 (2012)
Timothy H. GARNETT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96701.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 20, 2012.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy H. Garnett appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).