Court Opinion

ID: 2692085
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:17:17.186478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:59:12.784796
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 358, 2009-Ohio-1392.]

         BOOTH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. DUFFY HOMES, INC., APPELLEE.
  [Cite as Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 358, 2009-Ohio-1392.]
Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I and cause remanded
        for consideration of Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.
   (No. 2008-2258 — Submitted February 17, 2009 — Decided April 1, 2009.)
              APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,
                           No. 07AP-680, 2008-Ohio-5261.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
        {¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of
whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion
in Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 66, 2009-Ohio-1, 902
N.E.2d 10.
        MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and
CUPP, JJ., concur.
        PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.
                                 __________________
        Fusco, Mackey, Mathews & Gill, L.L.P., and Michael J. Fusco, for
appellants.
        Zeiger, Tigges & Little, L.L.P., John W. Zeiger, Stuart G. Parsell, and
Matthew S. Zeiger, for appellee.
                              ______________________