Court Opinion

ID: 9669284
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 02:47:50.081511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:55.010060
License: Public Domain

*956On Motion for Rehearing.
Careful consideration has been given to the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but we still, adhere to the views expressed in the original opinion.
It is desired to make one correction therein. The case of Cobb v. Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709 was not decided by the Supreme Court until November 14, 1945; rehearing was denied December 12, 1945. This case was not published prior to the ginning season. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the' Court of Civil Appeals which was decided December 22,' 1944, rehearing denied January 19, 1945, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W.2d 133. The Ibound volume of the Southwestern in which the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals' was reported was published prior to June, 1945.
No better way could have been devised to vest the right of control over the operation of these trucks in • appellant than to place the legal title in its name. With the title in appellant it had the legal right to operate the same' without a certificate of necessity and convenience. If it was not vested with the right of control the carriage was illegal.
The motion for rehearing is in all things overruled.