Court Opinion

ID: 8475175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:21:35.327344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:24.915338
License: Public Domain

SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Annapolis Shipping Company Limited appeals from a February 23, 2009 order of the District Court. While this appeal was sub judice, we decided Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 585 F.3d 58 (2d Cir.2009), in which we overruled Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPI, 310 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 2002), and held that electronic fund transfers being processed by intermediary banks are no longer subject to attachment under Rule B. In another recent decision, Hawknet, Ltd. v. Overseas Shipping Agencies, No. 09-2128-cv, 587 F.3d 127, 2009 WL 3790654 (2d Cir. Nov.13, 2009), we held that our decision in Shipping Corp. of India applies retroactively. Accordingly, we VACATE the District Court’s order and REMAND the matter to the District Court with instructions to enter an order to show cause why it should not dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction in light of these recent decisions.