Court Opinion

ID: 8462763
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:34:58.03628+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.711157
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Gerald Noble appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Noble, No. 3:95-cr-00488-JFA-5 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.