Court Opinion

ID: 4244862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-14 15:25:08.405019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:27.334583
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 8, 2018

                                           S    In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                          Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                        No. 05-17-00159-CR

                                JAMES OTIS JONES, Appellant
                                            V.
                               THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                       On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court
                                    Collin County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. 380-81551-2015

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                           Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck
                                   Opinion by Justice Bridges
        James Otis Jones waived a jury and pleaded guilty to murder. During the punishment

phase, appellant pleaded not true to two enhancement paragraphs. After finding appellant guilty

and the enhancement paragraphs true, the trial court assessed punishment at life imprisonment and

a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect,

there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim.

App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel

delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response,
but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel).

       We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal.

       We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                                   /David L. Bridges/
                                                   DAVID L. BRIDGES
                                                   JUSTICE

Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
170159F.U05

                                                –2–
                                       S
                              Court of Appeals
                       Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      JUDGMENT

 JAMES OTIS JONES, Appellant                       On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District
                                                   Court, Collin County, Texas
 No. 05-17-00159-CR        V.                      Trial Court Cause No. 380-81551-2015.
                                                   Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges.
 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                      Justices Myers and Schenck participating.

       Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 8, 2018.

                                             –3–