Court Opinion

ID: 3240987
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:14:24.360687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:36.837996
License: Public Domain

This is a companion case to 172 So. 284, (3 Div. 191)1 between the same parties, involving the same subject matter, the same legal questions, and looking to the same relief.
No. 191 was a mandamus proceeding, while this is under the Declaratory Judgment Act. Both were submitted and argued together.
This cause is affirmed on the authority of the decision in172 So. 284,1 this day rendered.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
1 Ante, p. 411.