Court Opinion

ID: 9629950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 09:54:12.639553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:07:27.890597
License: Public Domain

NIX, Judge
(specially concurring).
Lest there be any misunderstanding, it should be pointed out that defendant did have standing to challenge the lawfulness of the search and seizure of the rifle. The applicable rule of law is set forth in Lindsey v. State, Okl.Cr., 488 P.2d 935 (1971). The question of standing and consent herein closely parallel Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). However, defendant’s failure to raise any objection until appeal constitutes a waiver.