Court Opinion

ID: 5871248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 01:47:46.360665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:43.060621
License: Public Domain

Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and now appeals from the resentence, contending that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and thus does not encompass his present challenge to the severity of the sentence. Although defendant validly waived the right to appeal at the plea proceeding (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), that waiver does not preclude him from challenging the sentence imposed upon resentencing (see People v Gray, 32 AD3d 1052, 1053 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 902 [2006]; People v Tausinger, 21 AD3d 1181, 1183 [2005]; see generally People v Dexter, 71 AD3d 1504, 1504-1505 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 887 [2010]; People v Rodriguez, 259 AD2d 1040 [1999]). Nevertheless, on the merits, we *1165conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, EJ., Garni, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.