Court Opinion

ID: 9353518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-12 01:00:19.479247+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:19.067940
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40382        Document: 00516607362             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/11/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-40382
                                                                                        FILED
                                                                                 January 11, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                          Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Carlos Alberto Maradiaga-Larios,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:22-CR-51-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alberto
   Maradiaga-Larios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maradiaga-Larios has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40382    Document: 00516607362         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/11/2023

                                 No. 22-40382

   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2