Court Opinion

ID: 8450769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:11:30.207367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.349252
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony Hough appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hough, No. 4:02-cr-00471-TLW-3 (D.S.C. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.