Court Opinion

ID: 691861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:14:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:53.267382
License: Public Domain

50 F.3d 17
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Michael Anthony LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50399.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 7, 1995.*Decided March 13, 1995.

Before:  SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Michael Anthony Lee appeals his conviction and 70-month sentence imposed following the entry of his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a).

3
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lee's counsel submitted a brief stating the he finds no meritorious issues for review.  Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3