Court Opinion

ID: 8058356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:35:16.80285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:57.311873
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beasley, C. J.
The plea, which has been demurred to, 5s not good, unless it contain facts which in law are sufficient to justify the arrest. The imprisonment of the wife of the plaintiff was legal, and consequently not actionable, if circumstances existed sufficiently suspicious to induce a discreet person to believe that she was guilty of the felony which had been committed. But these facts, constituting what in the books is called “ probable cause,” must be set out in the plea. Mure v. Kaye et al., 4 Taunt. 34. In the plea now in hand, the facts stated are, simply, that the plaintiff’s wife was near the wife of the defendant at the time the larceny was discovered, and that certain bystanders, one of whom was a police officer, asserted that there were grounds of suspicion. It will be observed, therefore, that the only circumstances relied on are the declarations of opinion by third persons, and the proximity of the party accused to the place of the discovery of the theft. Such facts do not constitute probable cause, for no prudent man, on such a groundwork, would impute crime to another. The accident of the presence of the plaintiff’s wife at the lime the money was missed, if unattended with words or conduct of a suspicious cast, was not an incident from which it was justifiable to draw any unfavorable inference, and beyond this the defendant had no ground for his conduct, so far as the facts of the transaction were concerned; for in an affair of this kind, his own suspicions, or those of others, unwarranted by the occurrence in any of its parts, must count as nothing. If the defendant had been informed by eye-witnesses to the scene, that they saw the wife of the plaintiff take the money, or do any act of a strongly suspicious nature, an entirely different case would have been presented. But the facts disclosed in this plea did not, in a legal view, warrant the arrest and im*102prisonment of the wife of the plaintiff. The issue, therefore,, on this demurrer must be decided against the defendant.
Judgment for demurrant.