Court Opinion

ID: 9433424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:40:08.642575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:41.392697
License: Public Domain

Justice Scalia,
concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I agree with the Court that “the purposes underlying the Treasury Amendment are most properly fulfilled by giving effect to the plain meaning of the language as Congress enacted it,” ante, at 474, which includes options to buy or sell foreign currency. This principle is contradicted, however, by the Court’s extensive discussion of legislative history, see ante, at 471, n. 8, 473-474, 478-479, as though that were necessary to confirm the “plain meaning of the lan*481guage,” or (worse) might have power to overcome it. I join all except those portions of the opinion, which achieve nothing useful and sow confusion in the law.