Court Opinion

ID: 996875
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:56:57.658374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:20.025364
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7010

WILBER LEE BARKER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

GEORGE DEEDS,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-96-1488-AM)

Submitted:   October 20, 1998          Decided:     November 10, 1998

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilber Lee Barker, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Barker v. Deeds, No. CA-96-1488-AM (E.D. Va.

June 9, 1998). In addition, issues raised for the first time on ap-

peal will not be reviewed. See Satterfield v. Zahradnick, 572 F.2d

443, 446 (4th Cir. 1978). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2