Court Opinion

ID: 9499745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 17:56:45.031635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:59:42.273025
License: Public Domain

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I join the opinion of the court. I concur in the denial of Mr. Lambert’s Motion for Stay of Execution and Motion to Recall the Mandate in Lambert v. McBride, 365 F.3d 557 (7th Cir.2004), and Motion to Recall the Mandate and for Stay of Execution in Lambert v. Davis, 449 F.3d 774 (7th Cir. 2006). Although I respectfully adhere to the view set forth in my dissenting opinion in Lambert v. Davis, 449 F.3d at 779-84, I recognize that the restrictions placed on this court by AEDPA prevent us from revisiting our judgment despite the pen-dency of Holmes v. Buss, No. 06-2905, before this court and Panetti v. Quarter-man, No. 06-6407, before the Supreme Court of the United States. Any further relief must come from the Supreme Court.