Court Opinion

ID: 5894321
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:58:16.675942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:26.709559
License: Public Domain

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]).
However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.