Court Opinion

ID: 4015671
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-14 14:18:47.355741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:05:40.826229
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-16-00184-CV

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                        CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

GIOVANNY LAGUAN,                                                                    Appellant,

                                                v.

2013 PLACE LLC,                                     Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                  of Fort Bend County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Giovanny Laguan, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered

against him in favor of appellee, 2013 Place LLC.1 On June 8, 2016, the Clerk of this

        1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston

pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE
ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.).
Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on

June 7, 2016, and that the deputy district clerk, Jaqueline Avila, had notified this Court

that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk

of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the

defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised

that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice,

the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
14th day of July, 2016.

                                              2