Court Opinion

ID: 4501403
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-24 20:00:27.445669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:23.540388
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 19-7695

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Petitioner - Appellee,

              v.

JERRY SPRINGSTEEN,

                     Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:15-hc-02081-BR)

Submitted: January 21, 2020                                       Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Springsteen, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Jerry Springsteen appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motions for

relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Springsteen, No. 5:15-hc-

02081-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                            AFFIRMED

                                           2