Court Opinion

ID: 6440917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:16:57.055219+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:52:34.298730
License: Public Domain

Rugg, C. J.
This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries received by her at about 9:15 on a March evening in the store of the defendant where she was a customer. The trial judge found that the plaintiff was injured while in the exercise of due care through the defective condition of the stairway, which was known to the defendant or had existed long enough so that the defendant by the exercise of reasonable care might have known that the defect existed. Substantial damages in favor of the plaintiff were assessed.
The plaintiff testified that as she was descending stairs in the store her foot caught on a ragged metal band sticking up *321about an inch on the edge of a stairway tread. A witness who had been both a ship and a house carpenter testified that he examined the stairway immediately after the accident and found that the brass band was sticking up about one half to five eighths of an inch and looked worn; that the brass was dull, dirty, loose, ragged, and sharp. This testimony was controverted but its credibility was for the trial judge.
It was the duty of the defendant, so far as reasonably practicable, to maintain its stairs in a reasonably safe condition for the use of the plaintiff. Judson v. American Railway Express Co. 242 Mass. 269, 271. There was evidence sufficient to support a finding of a breach of that duty. The case is governed by Serota v. Salmansohn, 256 Mass. 224, and Solomon v. Boston Elevated Railway, 276 Mass. 139, and cases cited. Loudon v. Beaulieu, 277 Mass. 33.

Order dismissing report affirmed.