Court Opinion

ID: 1029316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:55:27.171745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:16.089793
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-6550

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

WILLIE LEE HICKS,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.    Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00233-REP-1)

Submitted:    June 22, 2009                   Decided:   July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Willie Lee Hicks appeals the district court’s order

denying   his   motion   for    reduction   of   sentence     pursuant   to   18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).         We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error.           Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.        United States v. Hicks, No. 3:03-

cr-00233-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009).            We deny Hicks’ motion

for   appointment   of   counsel.     We    dispense   with    oral   argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                      2