Court Opinion

ID: 5574354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:19:37.727807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:52.456357
License: Public Domain

Candler, J.
1. A consent decree will not be set aside because, “ through accident and mistake,” one of the consenting parties failed to introduce evidence which was in his possession and which might, if submitted on a trial, have resulted in the rendition of a decree different from the one which was taken by consent.
2. It is not error to refuse to entertain a petition to enjoin the cutting of timber on land which, by a decree to which the plaintiff consented, has been legally adjudged to be the property of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.