Court Opinion

ID: 660989
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:11:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:17.396548
License: Public Domain

14 F.3d 598NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert TEACHEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Robert Teachey, pro se.
Stephen Scott Zimmerman, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM
OPINION

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Teachey, Nos.  CR-90-377-S;  CA-93-2381-S (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED