Court Opinion

ID: 9729269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 14:30:32.918039+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:20:57.317687
License: Public Domain

WIEAND, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result achieved by the majority and join that portion of the majority opinion which holds that Ols-son’s act of signalling to Zeller, as a matter of law, was not the legal cause of Askew’s injury. In light of the majority’s resolution of the causation issue, however, I find it unnecessary to determine whether Olsson owed any duty of care to Askew, who was not the driver of the crossing vehicle to whom the signal was given, and who was operating his motorcycle on the shoulder of the road and passing stopped vehicles on the right. Therefore, I do not join the portion of the majority opinion which seeks to address this issue.