Court Opinion

ID: 1003447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:26:29.098269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:18.416463
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Arnold Murdock appeals the district court’s order denying him an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal of his conviction and sentence.
  
   *
  
  We have
   
   *336
   
  reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Murdock’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motion for a certificate of appeal-ability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Murdock,
  
  No. CR-92-301-S (D.Md. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   DISMISSED.
  

   *
  

   Final judgment was entered in Murdock’s case in 1993. Therefore, the district court construed Murdock’s notice of appeal, filed July 31, 2000, as a motion for extension of time to file an appeal,