Court Opinion

ID: 8024405
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:32:18.439718+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:18.775372
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Per Curiam:
Before making application for writ to this court relator should have availed himself of the remedy offered by Section 9776, *633R. C. M. 1935. This he did not do. On authority of State ex rel. Woodard, et al., v. District Court, 120 Mont. 585, 189 Pac. (2d) 998, and State ex rel. Lichte v. District Court, 121 Mont. 34, 189 Pac. (2d) 1004, the writ is denied and the proceeding here dismissed.
Mr. Joseph J. McCaffery, Jr., Esq., attorney for Relator.