Court Opinion

ID: 1008740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:45:02.463767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:53.100824
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7196

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JERNARD ELLIOTT RICE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-01-49-5-BR, CA-02-169-5-BR)

Submitted:   September 18, 2002           Decided:   October 10, 2002

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jernard Elliott Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jernard Elliott Rice seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).   We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning

of the district court that Rice has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.     See United States v.

Rice, Nos. CR-01-49-5-BR; CA-02-169-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2