Court Opinion

ID: 67310
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:20:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:22.380818
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            July 23, 2009
                                     No. 08-40737
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID LLOYD RUTKOSKE,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:06-CV-4

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Lloyd Rutkoske
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).            Rutkoske has filed a response.             Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rutkoske’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.