Court Opinion

ID: 2964969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:33:38.520206+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:45.063082
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-2202

                                        IN RE:

                                    FRIEDRICH LU,

                                     Petitioner.
                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                  [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
                                                ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Friedrich Lu on brief and petition for mandamus pro se.
            ____________

                                 ____________________

                                  NOVEMBER 19, 1997
                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.   For the  reasons  stated in  the district
                 ___________

            court order, appellant's complaint properly was dismissed for

            want  of federal subject matter jurisdiction and the district

            court could not enjoin enforcement  of the state court order.

            Further, we find no basis for mandamus relief here.

                 The  judgment is affirmed, and the petition for mandamus
                                  ________

            is denied.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.  
               ______   ___

                                         -2-