Court Opinion

ID: 806488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-08-13 18:10:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:40.889606
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-30003     Document: 00511953841         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/13/2012

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 13, 2012
                                     No. 12-30003
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY BELVIN,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 2:11-CR-115-1

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Belvin has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Belvin has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Belvin’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.