Court Opinion

ID: 1008594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:42:41.013821+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:55.267026
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Charles H. Roane appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his medical malpractice action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Roane v. Washington County Hosp.,
  
  No. CA-98-3191-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.