Court Opinion

ID: 5128695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-11-23 15:00:42.290863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:08.785388
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-10584      Date Filed: 11/23/2021   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-10584
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SILVIO ARBOLEDA,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Southern District of Florida
            D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-20193-KMM-2
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-10584        Date Filed: 11/23/2021     Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                21-10584

Before: WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, LUCK and LAGOA, Cir-
cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Sherri A. Romano, appointed counsel for Silvio Arboleda in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Arboleda’s conviction and sen-
tence are AFFIRMED.