Court Opinion

ID: 5919745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:25:31.542089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:20.582797
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 2010, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance *1218benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant had worked as a mechanical design engineer for 29 years when his employer instituted a voluntary reduction in force program in an effort to avoid eventual layoffs. He had no information that his job would be eliminated, but nevertheless accepted the severance package out of concern that he or his coworkers would be laid off. Inasmuch as leaving a job in order to take advantage of a severance or early retirement package when continuing work is available does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause (see Matter of Keane [Commissioner of Labor], 93 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 854 [2013]; Matter of Powell [Commissioner of Labor], 79 AD3d 1507, 1507 [2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 701 [2011]). Substantial evidence further supports the Board’s finding that claimant received retirement incentives identical to those that he would have been provided had he been laid off and that, as a result, he lacked “a compelling financial incentive to leave his job” (Matter of Biedka [Hudacs], 196 AD2d 944, 944 [1993]; see Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146, 153 [1975]).
Mercure, J.E, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.