Court Opinion

ID: 9505483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 20:05:27.304263+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:31.832080
License: Public Domain

DICKSON, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent, believing that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals correctly decided this case. In addition, I continue to believe that we incorrectly decided Ind. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Carlberg, 694 N.E.2d 222 (Ind.1997), and Ind. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc. v. Reyes, 694 N.E.2d 249 (Ind.1997), upon which today's majority opinion rests.
It should be noted that today's decision does not address whether the IHSAA's "hardship rule" or its "restitution rule" may be invalid or unlawfully applied in light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Brentwood Acad. v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 531 U.S. 288, 121 S.Ct. 924, 148 LEd.2d 807 (2001), which was decided after the decision of the Court of Appeals.
RUCKER, J., concurs.