Court Opinion

ID: 8942839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 08:05:51.95216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:09:46.532145
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc in case No. 85-1798 were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges Russell, Widener, Phillips, Murna-ghan, Ervin, Chapman and Wilkinson voted to rehear No. 85-1798 in banc; and Chief Judge Winter, Judges Hall and Sprouse voted against rehearing the case in banc. A majority of judges having voted to grant rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing in banc is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that No. 85-1798 shall be calendared for argument at the October session of Court.
In No. 85-2033, Judge Widener and Judge Hall voted to deny the EEOC’s motion for leave to intervene and file a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc. Judge Haynsworth voted to grant the motion for leave to intervene, but voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
Entered at the direction of Judge Hall.