Court Opinion

ID: 9677878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:03:09.912161+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:59.406341
License: Public Domain

On Petition to Reheae
This is an opinion on petition to rehear. Appellant, Daniel C. Hale, Jr., has filed a petition to rehear in this cause. Appellant’s argument has been read and con*657sidered. It appears, that appellant is confusing lack of notification, averred in his bill, with lack of knowledge. This is erroneous because these two terms are in no way synonymous. Where an employer is charged with knowledge of the provisions of the group policy, as here, lack of notification is of no consequence.
This Court is of opinion that it has not overlooked any material allegation in the original bill and that its decision is not in error.
The petition to rehear is denied.
Dyeb, Chief Justice, and ChattiN, Humphreys and McCaNuess, Justices, concur.