Court Opinion

ID: 4731308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:55:59.42559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:08:03.707369
License: Public Domain

Dunbar, C. J.
(concurring) — While I have no fault to find with the doctrine announced by Judge Chadwick, I think it conclusively appears for another reason that the action of the court in regard to the rejection of testimony was without prejudice. It is not contended by the appellant that the verdict was excessive. In fact, it was candidly announced by the attorney for the appellant in Ms argument that no question was raised as to the excessiveness of the verdict. That being true, the testimony offered was entirely without materiality, and therefore its rejection was without prejudice.
I therefore concur in the result.