Court Opinion

ID: 9751375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 16:22:49.338688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:43.895259
License: Public Domain

NIX, Justice
(dissenting).
In the instant case upon a filing of its petition the Deputy Attorney General, appellee’s counsel and the supervising judge went into an anteroom at which time the stenographer read questions asked of appellee that day during the grand jury. Appellee’s counsel was then asked to leave, but the Deputy Attorney General remained with the supervising judge for a short in camera hearing. These facts are similar to those in In re Falone, 464 Pa. 42, 346 A.2d 9 (1975), and I dissent here for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in In re Falone, supra.
EAGEN, J, joins in this dissenting opinion.