Court Opinion

ID: 9404387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-22 21:03:27.351934+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:13.565988
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048      Doc: 16         Filed: 06/21/2023     Pg: 1 of 3

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6048

        OFFIE CURTIS BROWN, JR.,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; JOE BIDEN; UNITED STATES
        DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
        ADMINISTRATION; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CRAVEN
        COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; CENTRAL PRISON; MAURY
        CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; CHERRY HOSPITAL; NEW BERN POLICE
        DEPARTMENT; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DORTHEA DIX HOSPITAL;
        CRAVEN COUNTY JAIL,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03165-FL)

        Submitted: June 15, 2023                                          Decided: June 21, 2023

        Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Offie Curtis Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048      Doc: 16         Filed: 06/21/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048      Doc: 16        Filed: 06/21/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              Offie Curtis Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

        § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v.

        N.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 5:22-ct-03165-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2022). We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3