Court Opinion

ID: 8126290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:06:49.304062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:14.339088
License: Public Domain

Brown, J.
I am satisfied that the immediate cause of the breaking adrift of the canal-boat William Walker, and of the ensuing collision, was that the signal to start was passed to the respondent’s tug before both of the lines of the lighter were made fast. One small line had been fastened, the other not. In a few moments the small line parted, and the boat drifted down against the libelant’s steamer.
The respondent’s tug in this case did not assume any part of the duty of arranging or securing the three boats to be towed. Her captain, I think, plainly understood that only two boats were to be taken, not including the Walker. The work of securing the lighter was undertaken entirely by her own men, and it was they who determined the time to start, and to pass the signal, “all right,” to the tug. The blame of the faulty start must rest on the lighter, and not on the tug. The Martino Cilento, 22 Fed. Rep. 859; The Jack Jewett, 23 Fed. Rep. 927. I find nothing in The Quickstep, 9 Wall. 665, 671, to the contrary. As I must hold that the captain of the tug did not know that the Walker was attached, or designed to be attached, to the other two boats that he agreed to take in tow, I cannot find any blame resting upon the tug, and therefore must dismiss the libel, with costs.