Court Opinion

ID: 3630793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 00:10:24.787983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:26.497350
License: Public Domain

[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 648 
[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 649 
REYNOLDS, C., reads for reversal and new trial; LOTT, Ch. C., and GRAY, C., concur.
EARL, C., reads for affirmance; JOHNSON, C., concurs.
LOTT, Ch. C., for reversal, on ground that the written contract could not be enlarged by an oral agreement, and that there was no acceptance of leather under the oral agreements.
Judgment reversed; EARL and JOHNSON, CC., dissenting.