Court Opinion

ID: 1001870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:02:08.916052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:20.668964
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ORLANDO DEMON DUGGINS, a/k/a Curley,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-93-18-WMN, CA-99-212-WMN)

Submitted:   June 15, 2000                 Decided:   June 21, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Demon Duggins, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Orlando Demon Duggins seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Duggins, Nos. CR-93-18-

WMN; CA-99-212-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1999).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2