Court Opinion

ID: 5249145
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:08:13.651662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:51.325720
License: Public Domain

People v Romero (2022 NY Slip Op 00054)

People v Romero

2022 NY Slip Op 00054

Decided on January 06, 2022

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: January 06, 2022

Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Oing, Moulton, Kennedy, JJ. 

Ind No. 2058/15 Appeal No. 14964 Case No. 2018-04332 

[*1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent, 
vEliu Romero, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Benjamin Rutkin-Becker of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Christopher Michael Pederson of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Shari Ruth Michels, J.), rendered October 23, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: January 6, 2022
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.