Court Opinion

ID: 9416952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:59:06.276847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:34.379963
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice BRADLEY, with whom concurred Mr. Justice FIELD,
dissenting:
I dissent from the judgment of the court, on the ground that an action will not lie for a tax of the kind in question in this case, unless it be first entered on the assessment-roll. The assessment-roll should be regarded as conclusive as to the persons or things liable to taxation. If it is not, if the matter is left open so that any person or corporation may be prosecuted for taxes at any time, it leaves the citizen exposed to many hazards, and to the mercy of prying informers, when the evidence by which he could have shown his immunity or exemption has perished. If an action of debt without an assessment can be brought, what is the limit of time within which it must he brought?' To what statute of limitations is the government subject? It seems to me that the decision introduces a new principle in the system of taxation, dangerous to the rights of the citizen and the peace and security of society.