Court Opinion

ID: 3848190
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:24:38.331482+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:47.884969
License: Public Domain

Submitted May 26, 1924.
At a municipal election held November 6, 1923, appellant was an unsuccessful candidate for school director in Parsons Borough; she filed a petition in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Luzerne County, praying that the ballot box be opened and the votes for the office in question recounted; relief was refused and this appeal followed.
Though the phrase about to be quoted is used in a general way by the petitioner, yet her averments of fact, if taken as true, do not present an instance of "palpable fraud or mistake" within the meaning of section 13 of the Act of May 19, 1923, P. L. 267; besides, petitioner fails to aver that the result of the election was in any way affected by the alleged errors of which she complains. Moreover, the real point which appellant desires reviewed, namely, whether ballots marked in a described *Page 207 
manner should, "as a matter of law," have been counted for certain persons, presents a question for an election contest (Pfaff v. Bacon, 249 Pa. 297, 304), and the petition lacks sufficiently specific averments of fraud, connected with this question, to render it one proper for consideration in a computation proceeding. In Plains Township Election Returns,280 Pa. 520, we recently examined the general subject here involved.
Under these circumstances, there is no necessity for discussing the jurisdiction of the court below or other points suggested by the record.
The appeal is dismissed.