Court Opinion

ID: 6013312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 11:03:09.05643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:26.869627
License: Public Domain

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondents are not submitting a brief and requests that this proceeding be dismissed as moot, inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and ex-pungement has been directed. Because petitioner has received all the relief that he is entitled to, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.