Court Opinion

ID: 9437433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 04:04:58.766445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:24:44.994509
License: Public Domain

LUCERO, J.,
concurring.
I join the concurrence of Judge McConnell insofar as its analysis is predicated on reasonable suspicion. Expressly, I do not join Judge Hartz’s analysis that is based on a generalized “reasonableness” standard; such a standard is contrary to the established en banc precedent of this court. United States v. Holt, 264 F.3d 1215, 1230 (10th Cir.2001) (applying Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) to the issue of whether questions in the course of a traffic stop violate the Fourth Amendment).