Court Opinion

ID: 9610572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 03:43:23.59329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:02.027244
License: Public Domain

Wertz, J.
(dissenting in part): I am unable to agree with the majority opinion of the court as to the construction placed on plaintiff’s third amended petition as set forth in paragraph two of the syllabus and the corresponding part of the opinion. I adhere to the rule of law as laid down in Moseman v. Penwell Undertaking Co., cited in the majority opinion. However, I do not think the rule as there announced is applicable to the instant case under the allegations of plaintiff’s petition. I am of the opinion that defendant Mahaffey’s demurrer to the third amended petition should have been overruled.