Court Opinion

ID: 1006621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:13:41.557395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.090955
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7685

RONALD HAMMOND,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. R. HUNT, JR.,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-761-5-BO)

Submitted:   January 16, 2002             Decided:   February 4, 2002

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appleton Reeves, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   Hammond v. Hunt, No. CA-00-761-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

filed Sept. 18, 2001; entered Sept. 19, 2001).   We also deny Ham-

mond’s motion for appointment of counsel.    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2