Court Opinion

ID: 40867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:55:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:51.512003
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                      March 8, 2006

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 04-40953
                           Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH NOVAK,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:04-CR-35-1
                       --------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Joseph Novak has moved to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).     Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.