Court Opinion

ID: 4300037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-01 17:05:49.492319+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:15:18.553977
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                   _____________________________

                           No. 1D17-4536
                   _____________________________

LAURI BURRIS, GREGORY F.
BURRIS, DOUGLAS O. ROWE,
RONALD E. BROWN, JR., JACOB
CHAPMAN, and MELISSA BURRIS,

    Petitioners,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Respondent.
                   _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

                          August 1, 2018

                   ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

    We grant the motion for clarification. Our prior opinion is
withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place:

     The petition for writ of prohibition is denied because
Petitioners have not demonstrated that the trial court is without
jurisdiction, or attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See
Scott v. Francati, 214 So. 3d 742, 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (noting
that “[p]rohibition is an extraordinary writ by which a superior
court may prevent an inferior court . . . from acting outside its
jurisdiction” (quoting Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850,
853 (Fla. 1992))).

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Mitchell A. Stone, Jacksonville Beach, H. Franklin Robbins, Jr.,
Orlando, and Steven G. Mason, Altamonte Springs, for Petitioners.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

                                 2