Court Opinion

ID: 2963360
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:08:50.583457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:31.715081
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          May 8, 1995           [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-2001                         FUN PIER, INC., AND WILLIAM HOWARD,                                  Plaintiffs, Appellants,                                          v.                       CHARLES EDENS AND EAST COAST RIDES, INC.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                    [Hon. Hector M. Laffitte, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Harry R. Segarra on brief for appellants.
            ________________            Samuel  B. Miller and   Weller,  Miller, Carrier,  Miller & Hickie
            _________________      ___________________________________________        on brief for appellees.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.   We have carefully  reviewed the record  in
                 __________            this  case,  including the  briefs  of  the  parties and  the            opinion and  order of  the district  court, dated  August 23,            1994.   Since we find no clear  error in the court's findings            of fact, the judgment below is affirmed. 
                                           ________