Court Opinion

ID: 9533530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:32:30.528791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:05.002393
License: Public Domain

BAXTER, J., Concurring.
Although I authored the majority opinion, I write separately to reiterate my disagreement with Mary M. v. City of Los Angeles (1991) 54 Cal.3d 202 [285 Cal.Rptr. 99, 814 P.2d 1341] (Mary M.) and to clarify that I adhere to the views set forth in my concurrence to that opinion and to those expressed by Justice George’s concurrence in the case at bar.
I also write separately because, while I agree with Justice George that Mary M. was wrongly decided and should be overruled, I do not believe this case presents the proper vehicle because the facts here are amply distinguishable.