Court Opinion

ID: 7480906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:55:34.641059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:59.145234
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The only meritorious point raised on appeal is whether the testimony by a state’s witness that appellant did not make a statement to the police officer after he was advised of his rights constituted fundamental error. There was no objection to the testimony at trial. On the basis of Clark v. State, 386 So.2d 468 (Fla.2d D.C.A.1976), we hold that it was not fundamental error.
AFFIRMED.
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.