Court Opinion

ID: 8678405
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:37:25.949763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.612497
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald McKinnon appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKinnon, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.