Court Opinion

ID: 9833068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:25:37.061123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:59.298841
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[2] Appellant grounds his complaint, both in his brief and in his motion for rehearing, upon the contention that the judgment by which he was disbarred is void upon its face, in that it appears from the record that there was no affirmative finding by the jury that he was guilty of fraudulent or dishonorable conduct or malpractice, and that such affirmative finding was essential to á judgment of *229disbarment. In deference to appellant’s apparent earnestness of belief in Ms contention, we will briefly discuss the matter.
The statutes (Rev. St. art. 325 et seq.) provide the method of procedure under which an attorney may be disbarred. It is there provided (article 325) that—
“Any attorney at law who shall be guilty 'of any fraudulent or dishonorable conduct, or of any malpractice, * * * may be suspended, or his license may be revoked by the district court,” etc.
In article 326 it is provided that, if complaint be made to the district court by a practicing attorney, etc., of such conduct or malpractice, such court shall order the offending attorney to be cited to show cause why his license should not be suspended or revoked, and articles 327, 328, and 329 provide the method by which complaint is made, service had, and trial conducted. All these articles appear to have been strictly complied with in this case. It is then provided in article 330:
“If the attorney be found guilty * * * the said court, by proper order entered on the minutes, may * * * revoke it [his license] entirely.”
In this case the verdict of the jury, under appropriate instructions, was that “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the complaint,” and judgment was thereupon rendered and entered in the minutes entirely revoking appellant’s license. It will be observed that there is no requirement that the jury specifically find the defendant guilty of fraudulent of dishonorable conduct or malpractice. In article 329 it is provided simply that the case shall be tried by a jury “in like manner as other cases,” and in article 330 it is provided that, if the attorney be found “guilty,” the court shall enter judgment thereon, revoking or suspending the license. That procedure was precisely followed in all respects in this case.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.