Court Opinion

ID: 3771665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:23:56.221504+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:48:24.665671
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On June 13, 2005, Appellant, American Arbitration Association, filed a notice of appeal from a May 11, 2005 judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. In that judgment, the trial court denied Appellant's Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
 {¶ 2} The general rule is that the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final appealable order. Lakewood v. Pfeifer (1992),83 Ohio App. 3d 47, 50. R.C. 2744.02 specifically declares that the denial of a motion to dismiss when sovereign immunity is alleged by the defendant is an exception to the general rule. In that scenario, the denial of a motion to dismiss based upon sovereign immunity is immediately appealable. Oliver v. Phelps, 11th Dist. No. 2003-T-0184,2004-Ohio-2787.
 {¶ 3} However, by the language used in R.C. 2744.02(C), it is clear the abovementioned exception only applies when the trial court's order denies "a political subdivision or an employee of a political subdivision the benefit of an alleged immunity from liability." In the present case, the motion to dismiss had been filed by Appellant, American Arbitration Association. Thus, the exception set forth in R.C. 2744.02(C) does not apply to this case.
 {¶ 4} This appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.
Grendell, J., Rice, J., concur.