Court Opinion

ID: 5619331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:29:54.112542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:21.093751
License: Public Domain

Pee Curiam.
This case is controlled by that of Gody v. Automobile Financing Inc., 37 Ga. App. 452 (140 S. E. 634) ; and tinder the rulings there made, the court in the instant case erred in admitting the evidence which directly contradicted the express provisions of the written contract. See also Hadden v. Williams, 37 Ga. App. 464 (140 S. E. 797).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G, J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. ■ Luhe, J., dissents.