Court Opinion

ID: 8683398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 06:34:09.365664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:32.311585
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Bittinger, No. 2:15-cv-02507-JMC, 2017 WL 1044845 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2017 & May 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED