Court Opinion

ID: 8466966
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:53:56.952311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.157309
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kali A. Hill appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.