Court Opinion

ID: 9691533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 20:37:42.303211+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:22.232561
License: Public Domain

EN BANC ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Harris County, has filed a motion for rehearing in this case. Tex. R.App. P. 49.1. After considering the record and the arguments presented, we hold that the motion is without merit. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is denied. Id. 49.3.
It is so ORDERED.
The motion was considered by the en banc Court, consisting of Chief Justice RADACK and Justices HEDGES, TAFT, NUCHIA, JENNINGS, KEYES, ALCALA, HANKS, and HIGLEY. Tex.R.App. P. 49.3.
A majority of the en banc Court voted to deny the motion. Id.
*293Justice KEYES, dissenting, joined by Justices TAFT, ALCALA, and HIGLEY. Tex.R.App. P. 47.5.