Court Opinion

ID: 9830331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:07:12.114104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:19.481960
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[6] In its motion for rehearing appellant has called our attention to the fact that, while our former judgment reduced the trial court’s judgment against it from $5,400 to $815, the costs of the appeal were taxed against it. This should not have been, and our judgment will accordingly be here so modified as to tax the costs of this appeal against appellees instead of against appellant. But in all other respects, although the motion for rehearing has been carefuHy considered, we are unconvinced that any error has been committed, and our former judgment will be adhered to.
Granted in part, and in part refused.