Court Opinion

ID: 9606538
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 02:50:42.523069+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:22.556855
License: Public Domain

JOHNSON, Vice Presiding Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur specially with the majority herein. See my Special Concurrance in Salazar v. State of Oklahoma, 852 P.2d 729.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

NOW on this 14th day of September, 1993, having examined the Petition for Rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause, and being fully advised in the premises, this Court finds that it should be, and the same hereby is DENIED. The reasons raised by the State as justification for the present petition were addressed in detail in Salazar v. State, 852 P.2d 729 (Okl.Cr. 1993). The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/Gary L. Lumpkin
GARY L. LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge
/s/Charles A. Johnson
CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Vice Presiding Judge
/s/James F. Lane
JAMES F. LANE, Judge
/s/Charles S. Chapel
CHARLES S. CHAPEL, Judge
/s/Reta M. Strubhar
RETA M. STRUBHAR, Judge