Court Opinion

ID: 9575745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:16:37.792476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:57.205490
License: Public Domain

Andrews, Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur because, as stated by the majority, Braddy v. State, 172 *475Ga. App. 386 (323 SE2d 219), aff’d State v. Braddy, 254 Ga. 366 (330 SE2d 338), is controlling here. I must state, however, that Braddy, as applied to the facts of this case, trivializes the “good character” defense.
Decided June 5, 1991
Reconsideration denied July 15, 1991
Chance, Maddox & Smith, David K. Smith, for appellant.
Darrell E. Wilson, District Attorney, Mickey R. Thacker, Sharon A. Moyer, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.