Court Opinion

ID: 3024605
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 22:31:54.414347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:03:52.310076
License: Public Domain

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
                                   FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

                                                 ______

                                            No. 00-6023EM
                                                ______

In re:                                              *
                                                    *
Joyce A. Washington,                                *
                                                    *
         Debtor.                                    *
                                                    *
American General Finance,                           *
                                                    *
         Plaintiff-Appellee,                        *    Appeal from the United States
                                                    *    Bankruptcy Court for the
                   v.                               *    Eastern District of Missouri
                                                    *
Joyce A. Washington,                                *
                                                    *
         Defendant-Appellant.                       *

                                                 ______

                                        Submitted: May 4, 2000
                                         Filed: May 23, 2000
                                                ______

Before KOGER, Chief Judge, KRESSEL, and WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judges.
                                        ______
KRESSEL, Bankruptcy Judge.

         American General Finance filed an adversary proceeding against the debtor, Joyce A. Washington,
under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) to determine the dischargeability of a debt. On motion of the plaintiff, the
bankruptcy court1 entered a default judgment against Washington, from which she appeals. Because the
bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

         1
         The Honorable David P. McDonald, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District
of Missouri.
BACKGROUND
         Washington filed her voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on October 26, 1999. AGF filed
its complaint against Washington on January 4, 2000. In its complaint, AGF asserted that when
Washington presented AGF with a check in the amount of $501.46 to obtain a release of a deed of trust
securing a debt to AGF, she knew that the payment would not be honored by her bank due to insufficient
funds. AGF argued that the $501.46 debt is nondischargeable and requested judgment in that amount plus
interest and costs of $406.42.

        The summons and a trial order were issued on January 13, 2000. The summons, the trial order
setting trial for March 6 at 10:00 a.m., the complaint, a motion to amend complaint, and the amended
complaint were all served on Washington on January 24, 2000. Washington did not answer or otherwise
respond to the complaint within thirty days as required by the summons or thereafter.

         AGF filed a motion for default judgment on February 28, 2000. The hearing on the motion was
also set for March 6, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., and notice of the hearing was served on Washington by mail on
the 25th of February, 2000. Washington did respond to AGF’s motion.

        The trial and the hearing on AGF’s motion was held as scheduled on March 6, 2000. Washington
did not appear. A default judgment against Washington, dated March 6, 2000, was entered on March 9,
2000. Washington filed her notice of appeal on March 14, 2000.

DISCUSSION

        We review the bankruptcy court’s entry of default judgment for an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Harre, 983 F.2d 128, 130 (8th Cir. 1993); Miller v. Kasden (In re Kasden), 209 B.R. 236, 238
(B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1997).

        AGF’s complaint alleged facts that were sufficient to make out a claim under § 523(a)(2)(A).
Washington failed to file an answer, thereby failing to deny any of the factual allegations which are therefore
deemed to be admitted pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7008(a), which incorporates Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d).
In addition, as part of its motion for default judgment, AGF filed an affidavit which also contained sufficient
facts to make out a claim under § 523(a)(2)(A). Once again, Washington did not respond, did not appear,
and did not present any facts to contradict AGF’s affidavit.

                                                      2
      Thus, it can hardly be said that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in entering a default
judgment in favor of AGF. It had a sufficient factual and legal basis for its judgment.

       In her submissions on appeal, Washington attempts to present, for the first time, facts which would
perhaps create a factual issue regarding the elements under § 523(a)(2) or would, under the proper
circumstances, create grounds for relief from the default judgment.

         Clearly, we cannot consider factual allegations made on appeal and not a part of the record before
the bankruptcy court nor are we in a position to grant relief from the default judgment based on the facts,
also raised for the first time on appeal, purporting to explain the defendant’s reasons for not answering the
complaint, the motion, or appearing at trial.

                                             CONCLUSION

        Because the bankruptcy court’s decision was amply supported in the record by the facts and the
law, the judgment of the bankruptcy court is affirmed.

        A true copy.

                Attest:

                          CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE
                          PANEL, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

                                                     3