Court Opinion

ID: 9831383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:02:22.104065+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:34.128592
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We find we were inaccurate in stating in the original opinion that the.state did not intervene to contest the evils complained of until after the comptroller had approved the report of the appraisers and the filing of the county judge’s calculation of the tax. The state intervened upon the filing of the appraisal with the county judge. The record does not seem to support the further finding that those chargeable had paid the amount of tax assessed against them upon said appraisal, although in its motion for rehearing the state admits that such payment was accepted by the state, without prejudice to its claim for additional tax.
With these corrections, which do not affect' the decision, appellant’s motion for rehearing will he overruled.