Court Opinion

ID: 4287284
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-22 15:01:13.987743+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:14.221429
License: Public Domain

(Slip Opinion)            Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018)                              1

                                     Per Curiam

       NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
       preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
       notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-
       ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
       that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     _________________

                                     No. 16–1017
                                     _________________

     LAITH G. COX, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES

      COURTNEY A. CRAIG, PETITIONER v. UNITED

                     STATES 

ANDREW K. LEWIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
    IAN T. MILLER, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES

   JOSEPH D. MORCHINEK, PETITIONER v. UNITED 

                   STATES 

       KELVIN L. O’SHAUGHNESSY, PETITIONER v.

                    UNITED STATES

 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF 

            APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

                                   [June 22, 2018]

  PER CURIAM. 

  The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently 

granted.
                                        It is so ordered.