Court Opinion

ID: 805289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-07-26 19:08:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:15.324356
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 to correct a clerical error in the judgment of conviction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Muhammad,
  
  No. 3:91-cr-00114-2 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.