Court Opinion

ID: 2671438
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-29 00:00:51.635776+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:33.088386
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Raymond 0. Leech appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, in which he attempted to collaterally challenge his criminal conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Leech,
  
  No. l:06-cr-00427-WDQ-2 (D.Md. Oct. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.