Court Opinion

ID: 8451266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:26:20.85937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.824765
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his motion for an extension of time to file a response to the magistrate judge’s recommendation in his underlying action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Harris seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.