Court Opinion

ID: 6348050
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-08 19:09:33.699531+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:24.528975
License: Public Domain

People v Hill (2022 NY Slip Op 03743)

People v Hill

2022 NY Slip Op 03743

Decided on June 8, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 8, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PAUL WOOTEN
JOSEPH J. ZAYAS, JJ.

2021-07507
 (Ind. No. 94/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJames Hill, appellant. 

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michael J. Yavinsky, J.), imposed September 16, 2021, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 254, 257). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see id. at 255-256).
DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court