Court Opinion

ID: 8450956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:17:52.111408+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.530101
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Rodney Morris Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:05-cr-00506-JCC-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 28, 2011). Jones’ motion for *164appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.