Court Opinion

ID: 9556630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-18 00:00:37.344763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:22.567277
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-30318         Document: 00516862216             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-30318                                    FILED
                                     Summary Calendar                            August 17, 2023
                                     ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Arthur Johnson,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                               USDC No. 2:18-CR-109-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Graves, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Arthur Johnson has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed an original brief and a supplemental brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We
   have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record

         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-30318     Document: 00516862216         Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/17/2023

                                  No. 22-30318

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2