Court Opinion

ID: 1004744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:45:50.561796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:34.762193
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6154

EDDIE DEAN MEEKS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-932-5-BR)

Submitted:   June 21, 2001                  Decided:   June 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Dean Meeks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Eddie Dean Meeks seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.         We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district   court.   Meeks   v.   United   States,   No.   CA-00-932-5-BR

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                               AFFIRMED

                                   2