Court Opinion

ID: 6402070
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 00:33:56.473469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:51:04.926582
License: Public Domain

President.
This action goes not on the foundation of fraud. The evidence proves none. And your verdict, going no farther than the allegata and probata, the facts alledged in the declaration and proved by testimony, cannot establish against the defendant any charge of fraud, nor acquit him of it. Your verdict must go on another point entirely, the undertaking that the horse was found. The question then is, what was the state of the horse, at the time of the sale. If he was only overheated or foundered, and the subsequent death was the effect of being worked after over-heating and foundering; Irwin must bear the lots: for Rankin sold him as an over-heated, and a foundered horse. If, on the contrary, the horse was, at the time of the sale, unsound of a disease, of which he afterwards died; Rankin must bear the loss; allowing for the profit, if any, made of the labour of the horse subsequent to the sale.
When the jury returned, and were ready to give a verdict, the plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.