Court Opinion

ID: 7210669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 19:36:34.385911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:49.630694
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Lisa Marie Spicknall appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp.2002) action. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spicknall v. Maryland, No. CA-01-886-MJG (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.