Court Opinion

ID: 9838347
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-06 06:10:06.798122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.907500
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed August 31, 2023

                                    S  In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00633-CV

                 IN RE GARY SINISE FOUNDATION, Relator

               Original Proceeding from the Collin County Probate
                              Collin County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. PB1-0352-2022

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                   Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy
                            Opinion by Justice Reichek
      Before the Court is relator’s June 28, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus

wherein relator contends the trial court has refused to rule on a motion to compel

arbitration.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition, real party in interest’s response,

relator’s reply, and the record properly before us, we conclude that relator has failed

to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Amanda L. Reichek/
                                         AMANDA L. REICHEK
                                         JUSTICE

230633F.P05

                                      –2–