Court Opinion

ID: 9411882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-28 09:10:27.658775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:16.460670
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                          TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                  No. 10-23-00183-CR

ELIAS MARTINEZ-VARGAS,
                                                              Appellant
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                              Appellee

                            From the 19th District Court
                             McLennan County, Texas
                            Trial Court No. 2020-700-C1

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Elias Martinez-Vargas appeals his conviction of three counts of Aggravated Sexual

Assault of a Child. The judgments were signed on June 2, 2022. Martinez-Vargas’ notice

of appeal was due July 5, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). It's filing on June 21, 2023,

is untimely.

       Martinez-Vargas also presented a motion for an extension of time to file his notice

of appeal. It is untimely as well. See id. 26.3. When both the notice of appeal and the

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal are untimely, we have no
jurisdiction to grant an out of time appeal; that authority belongs exclusively to the Court

of Criminal Appeals through a writ of habeas corpus. See Parr v. State, 206 S.W.3d 143,

144-45 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.).

        We have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal, and this appeal must be dismissed.

See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction

where notice of appeal is untimely). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.1

        Martinez-Vargas’ motion for leave and motion for extension of time are also

dismissed.

                                                 TOM GRAY
                                                 Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson, and
       Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Motions dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed July 26, 2023
Do not publish
[CR25]

1
  Even if Martinez-Vargas’ notice of appeal was timely, this appeal would still be dismissed because
Martinez-Vargas pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain and the trial court's certificate of right of appeal
indicates Martinez-Vargas has no right to appeal and has waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(d) ("The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal
has not been made part of the record under these rules."); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2006) (plea bargain); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (waiver of appeal).

Martinez-Vargas v. State                                                                            Page 2