Court Opinion

ID: 9577103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:31:45.05404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:19:58.982803
License: Public Domain

WARREN, J.,
concurring.
I agree with Judge Edmonds’ dissent that a dog sniff is not a search and that State v. Juarez-Godinez, 135 Or App 591, 604-05, 900 P2d 1044 (1995), affd 326 Or 1 (1997), holding to the contrary, in which I joined, was wrongly *247decided. Because, however, we are at this point bound by our holding that a dog sniff does constitute a search, I agree with the majority that there is no principled basis to make a dog-sniff exception to the probable cause requirement.