Court Opinion

ID: 3801553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:43:51.239954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:31.706096
License: Public Domain

Plaintiff in error, Edna Kiggins, and Rebecca Couch were jointly informed against for the *Page 307 
offense of petit larceny. They were jointly tried. The jury rendered their verdict finding Rebecca Couch not guilty and finding Edna Kiggins guilty as charged and assessing her punishment at a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, she appealed by filing in this court on June 15, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error in part as follows:
"Two errors occurred in the trial of the cause that we think, under the former holdings of this court, should and will reverse the same. The first one is the denial of the court to give to the jury instructions Nos. 5 and 6 requested by defendant. These instructions go to the fact that there might have been an accident or a misunderstanding that caused the hotel's property to be packed in that of the moving defendant. The other one is because the court told the jury, in instruction No. 6, that if they had a reasonable doubt as to the guilt `or innocence' of the defendant they must acquit. This instruction is contrary to the law as laid down by this court in a number of cases, the last being Findley v. State, 13 Okla. Crim. 130 [162 P. 680]. The burden must not be put upon the defendant. Recurring to the first exception herein, which we allow, we say that to have gotten said property mixed up by accident was the only theory within reach of the defendant, and she should have had the benefit of it. SeePayton v. State, 4 Okla. Crim. 316 [111 P. 666]; McIntosh v.State, 8 Okla. Crim. 474 [128 P. 735]," etc.
From a careful examination of the record, we are satisfied that the confession of error is well founded.
The judgment is therefore reversed. *Page 308