Court Opinion

ID: 998402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:10:39.451264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:49.603273
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-6012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT G. WRIGHT,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-89-113-R, CA-98-693-R)

Submitted:   March 2, 1999                 Decided:   April 16, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert G. Wright appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider.   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.   See United States v. Wright,

Nos. CR-89-113-R; CA-98-693-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 1998).     We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2