Court Opinion

ID: 9889560
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-10 17:18:14.526825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:12.069823
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA
                                                       71

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                 NO.   2023    KW    0846

VERSUS

KELTON       L.    SPANN                                                                                         W

In    Re:          Kelton           L.    Spann,  applying for supervisory writs,   22nd

                   Judicial              District Court,  Parish of Washington, No.  22-

                   CR5- 148855.

BEFORE:            McCLENDON,             HESTER,           AND   MILLER,       JJ.

        WRIT       DENIED           ON    THE        SHOWING       MADE.    Relator          failed      to    include

a             of     the      March           20,     2023       transcript,          a   file    dated       copy     of
     copy
his    previously             filed           motion        to    quash,    a    file       dated      copy     of    his
                  for    bill            of         particulars,           and                other       pertinent
motion                                                                                any
documents           from       the        district           court      record        that    may      support        the

claims       in      the      writ        application.                  Supplementation             of    this       writ

application             and/ or           an        application          for     rehearing          will       not     be

considered.                  See     Uniform          Rules        of   Louisiana           Courts       of    Appeal,

Rules       2- 18. 7 &         4-   9.        In     the    event       relator       elects      to     file    a    new

application             with        this       court,        he may do so without the necessity
of    securing           a    return            date.          Any future filing on this issue
should           include        the        entire           contents       of    this        application,             the

missing items noted above,                             and a copy of this                 ruling.

                                                                 PMC
                                                                 CHH
                                                                 SMM

COURT       OF    APPEAL,           FIRST      CIRCUIT

IgE          PIUTY      CLERK        OF   COURT
                   FOR       THE     COURT