Court Opinion

ID: 8608952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:19:44.751503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.935114
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Ciabattino Raphael McShan seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and directing additional briefing on the remaining issues. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McShan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.