Court Opinion

ID: 7337124
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 23:15:18.439552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:13.475003
License: Public Domain

CULLEN, J.
This proceeding was instituted by the purchaser at a sale on a judgment in a foreclosure action to remove a tenant in possession of the mortgaged premises, who had been made a party to the action. These proceedings are statutory, in derogation of the common law, and there is no jurisdiction to entertain them except in the cases provided by statute. Benjamin v. Benjamin, 5 N. Y. 383. Whatever may have been the case under the act of 1874 (chapter 208), now, by the express terms of subdivision 2 of section 2232 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the remedy of summary proceedings is confined to foreclosures under title 9, c. 17, of that Code, which relates only to foreclosures by advertisement. On this ground it was held in People v. Burdick (Sup.) 5 N. Y. Supp. 363, that summary proceedings would not lie on a foreclosure of a mortgage made to the loan commissioners. The respondent’s remedy is by application in the foreclosure suit for an order in the nature of a writ of assistance. Code, § 1675.
The final order should be reversed, with costs. All concur.