Court Opinion

ID: 9927555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-29 14:07:57.099886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:19.490829
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Estadt, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024-Ohio-273.]

                         DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ESTADT.
 [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Estadt, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024-Ohio-273.]
   (No. 2023-0177—Submitted January 25, 2024—Decided January 26, 2024.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, John Robert Estadt, Attorney
Registration No. 0016397, last known business address in St. Clairsville, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 12, 2023, wherein
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the
practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has complied with
that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Estadt, __ Ohio St.3d __,
2023-Ohio-2347, __ N.E.3d __.
        KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER,
and DETERS, JJ., concur.
                                  _________________