Court Opinion

ID: 9389706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-26 06:07:41.492729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:29.058050
License: Public Domain

DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 20, 2023

                                S  In The
                          Court of Appeals
                   Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                            No. 05-22-01067-CV

      PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, LLC AND JAMES C. LANKFORD,
                    INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants
                              V.
                THE LAW COMPANY, INC., Appellee

                  On Appeal from the 95th District Court
                          Dallas County, Texas
                   Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762

                       MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove
                         Opinion by Justice Breedlove
      Before the Court is appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal based on

settlement. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1).

                                       /Maricela Breedlove/
                                       MARICELA BREEDLOVE
                                       JUSTICE

221067F.P05
                                   S
                           Court of Appeals
                    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                   JUDGMENT

PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, LLC                   On Appeal from the 95th District
AND JAMES C. LANKFORD,                      Court, Dallas County, Texas
INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants                    Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762.
                                            Opinion delivered by Justice
No. 05-22-01067-CV         V.               Breedlove, Justices Nowell and
                                            Goldstein participating.
THE LAW COMPANY, INC.,
Appellee

      In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

       As agreed by the parties, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of
this appeal.

Judgment entered April 20, 2023.

                                      –2–