Court Opinion

ID: 3669153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:18:14.415423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:21.779122
License: Public Domain

Civil action heard on motion to vacate judgment confirming referee's report without more. Motion denied and plaintiffs appeal.
This is the same case that was before us at the last term, 203 N.C. 498, opinion filed 9 November, 1932. Error having been found in the judgment of the Superior Court, the cause was remanded with direction that the order of confirmation be vacated and further proceedings had according to the usual course and practice of the court.
Plaintiffs moved, upon said opinion and judgment being certified down, that the order of confirmation be vacated, without more, thus seeking to have the case tried before a jury. The court declined to sign the judgment tendered on this motion, but remanded the cause "in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court" to the referee for additional findings and supplement report. This was within his authority, the original reference having been by consent. Morisey v. Swinson,  104 N.C. 555, 10 S.E. 754;Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N.C. 515, 23 S.E. 427; Flemming v. Roberts,77 N.C. 415.
The order sending the cause back to the referee was perforce tantamount to vacating the previous order of confirmation. Of course, the plaintiffs are entitled to notice and a hearing before the referee, with right of appeal to the court in case his additional findings are adverse. As thus construed, we perceive no cause for complaint on the part of the plaintiffs.
Affirmed. *Page 480