Court Opinion

ID: 752779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-18 01:51:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:49.027501
License: Public Domain

139 F.3d 908
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rozell ASH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50414.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1998.Submitted Feb. 9, 1998**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before PREGERSON, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Rozell Ash appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to five counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).  Ash's attorney has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Ash has submitted a pro se supplemental brief, which we have considered.  Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

3
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3