Court Opinion

ID: 4248754
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-28 01:00:22.070064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:45.890408
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-40573      Document: 00514365103         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/27/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 17-40573
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                    February 27, 2018
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                    Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE JAVIER GUTIERREZ-MATAMOROS, also known as Mario Roberto
Gutierrez-Moros,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:17-CR-20-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Javier
Gutierrez-Matamoros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez-Matamoros has not filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40573   Document: 00514365103    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/27/2018

                               No. 17-40573

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2