Court Opinion

ID: 3085688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:43:08.385864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:55.834232
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00641-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JOSE ALFREDO GARCIA,                                                    Appellant,

                                         v.

CARLOS ABREGO,                                      Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 404th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Jose Alfredo Garcia, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment

entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron, County, Texas, in cause no. 2011-DCL-

4788-G. Appellant’s amended notice of appeal states he is appealing a judgment dated

October 30, 2013.
      Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there is no final

appealable judgment dated October 30, 2013. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant

of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected

within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s notice, the appeal would be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant has responded by providing a copy of a final

judgment issued in cause no. 2011-DCL-4788-G, signed May 7, 2012.

      Based on the Court’s review of another appeal involving the same parties, Garcia

v. Abrego, Cause No. 13-12-00390-CV, 2013 Tex. App. WL 4033969 (Tex. App.—Corpus

Christi Aug. 08, 2013, no pet.)(per curiam), the matter subject to appeal herein has

already been addressed.

      Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id.

42.3(a),(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

                                                                     PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
17th day of April, 2014.

                                            2