Court Opinion

ID: 59699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 03:24:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:06.689533
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                  April 2, 2008
                                No. 07-11014
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CLYDE ROWE

                                            Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 3:06-CR-2-ALL

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Clyde Rowe raises arguments
that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005),
which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether
the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion
for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-11014

     2