Court Opinion

ID: 1001874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:02:11.09175+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:35.510290
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-1419

JACOB ROGINSKY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BRIAN H. HERLIHY, Officer; WILLIAM R. WINTERS,
Sergeant; CAROLYN A. WOODWARD, Lieutenant;
TIMOTHY D. PLUMER, Lieutenant,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-99-3267-AW)

Submitted:   June 15, 2000                 Decided:   June 21, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacob Roginsky, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., Colum-
bia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jacob Roginsky appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Roginsky v. Herlihy, No. CA-99-3267-AW (D.

Md. Mar. 21, 2000.*    We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
March 20, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on March 21, 2000. Pursuant to Rules
58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the
date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as
the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                 2