Court Opinion

ID: 8428980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 05:02:17.829394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:34.573018
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Darlene P. Lumpkin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lumpkin v. Torres, No. CA-02-792-3 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.