Court Opinion

ID: 5774002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:37:31.692526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:50.675761
License: Public Domain

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the amended order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
“Custody determinations depend to a great extent upon the hearing court’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and of the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties. Where, as here, a hearing court has conducted a complete evidentiary hearing, its finding must be accorded great weight, and its award of custody will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record” (Matter of Francis v Cox, 57 AD3d 776, 776-777 [2008]; Matter of Manfredo v Manfredo, 53 AD3d 498, 499-500 [2008]). Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court had a sound and substantial basis in the record to support its determination that awarding him sole legal custody of the subject child was not in the child’s best interest.
The mother’s cross appeal must be dismissed as academic because the challenged makeup visits were scheduled to take place in 2008. Fisher, J.E, Miller, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.