Court Opinion

ID: 8582210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 15:23:14.133738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:54:09.570921
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.
Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $322,005.69 for medical services rendered to an inmate in the custody of respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim in the sum of $315,427.47, rather than the amount claimed of $322,005.69. Claimant is in agreement, with respondent in its assessment that the correct amount of the claim is $315,427.47. Further, respondent states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.
While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).
Claim disallowed.