Court Opinion

ID: 9626998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 08:30:36.647971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:06:38.168576
License: Public Domain

Hill, J.
(dissenting)—The writ of habeas corpus is granted in this case for reasons stated in detail in the majority opinion in the Joseph Joe Wesley case (In re Wesley v. Schneckloth (1959), ante p. 90, 346 P. (2d) 658).
As in the Wesley case, the petitioner here (Agnes Monroe) entered a plea of guilty to the charge against her (one of the Ten Major Crimes) in the superior court. It is conceded that no jurisdictional issue was raised.
The issues argued are the same as in the Wesley case. I dissent from the conclusion of the majority, and would deny the writ. My views are expressed more fully in my dissent in In re Wesley, supra.
Mallery and Finley, JJ., concur with Hill, J.