Court Opinion

ID: 6403691
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 11:47:13.290502+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:42.825228
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

There can be no doubt that these stoves were a part of the house, and passed with it to the plaintiff by the levy of his execution; and so it appears the appraisers considered them The defendant, then, had no right to sever them from the freehold; and in doing it he was a mere trespasser, (a)

Judgment on the verdict. 
(2)

 [There can be no doubt that the stoves were not fixtures. — Ed.]

 Vide 4 Co. 62, Herlakenden’s case.—1 Salk. 368, Poole’s case