Court Opinion

ID: 7806662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-06 18:00:30.525299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:16.061981
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-11146      Document: 00516460155         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/06/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                   September 6, 2022
                                  No. 21-11146
                                Summary Calendar                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Alfredo Lopez-Enciso,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:21-CR-149-4

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Alfredo Lopez-Enciso has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Lopez-Enciso has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-11146     Document: 00516460155          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/06/2022

                                   No. 21-11146

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Lopez-Enciso’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2