Court Opinion

ID: 992249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:49:16.339592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:34.845149
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6065

STEPHEN LOVE PRESTON,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-88-111, CA-96-413-R)

Submitted:   May 15, 1997                   Decided:   May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Love Preston, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OF-
FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Preston v. United States, Nos. CR-88-111; CA-96-413-R (W.D.
Va. Dec. 17, 1996). The Government's motion to dismiss is denied as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2