Court Opinion

ID: 4866812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 02:21:34.217156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:11.216885
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 28, 2011, the Court has determined that the Amended Final Judgment is not a final order because it fails to conclude the judicial labor in the case. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as premature. The appellant’s Emergency Motion to Stay Appeal and Remand to the Trial Court; or in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of Cer-tiorari, filed on July 13, 2011, is denied.
DAVIS, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.