Court Opinion

ID: 9905150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-28 21:01:26.067603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:45.128007
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1759      Doc: 9        Filed: 11/27/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1759

        SAMUEL A. LYONS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        ILEEN M. TICER GREENE, Former Lead Counsel for PMA Indemnity Insurance,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Albert David Copperthite, Magistrate Judge. (1:23-cv-00359-ADC)

        Submitted: November 21, 2023                                Decided: November 27, 2023

        Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Samuel A. Lyons, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas A. Datt, KIERNAN TREBACH LLP,
        Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1759      Doc: 9        Filed: 11/27/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Samuel A. Lyons appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting Ileen M. Ticer

        Greene’s motion to dismiss Lyons’ amended complaint. * We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. Lyons v.

        PMA Indem. Ins., No. 1:23-cv-00359-ADC (D. Md. July 11, 2023). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

               *
                The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
        § 636(c).

                                                    2