Court Opinion

ID: 4466709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-20 21:07:53.783818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:54.371506
License: Public Domain

People v Alverado (2019 NY Slip Op 09221)

People v Alverado

2019 NY Slip Op 09221

Decided on December 20, 2019

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

1304 KA 15-00358

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vMARIO ALVERADO, ALSO KNOWN AS MARIO ALVERADO-MATEO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered February 10, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) and sodomy in the first degree (former § 130.50 [1]), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel as a result of defense counsel's failure to make a motion to dismiss the indictment as time-barred (see CPL 30.10 [2] [former (a)], [b]). The record on appeal, however, "is inadequate to enable us to determine whether such a motion would have been successful and whether defense counsel's failure to make that motion deprived defendant of meaningful representation" (People v Youngs, 101 AD3d 1589, 1589 [4th Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1105 [2013]). Thus, we conclude that "defendant's contention is appropriately raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440" (id.).
Entered: December 20, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court