Court Opinion

ID: 5629645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 05:14:44.874216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:45.188566
License: Public Domain

Gardner, P. J.
Counsel for the plaintiff in error complied with Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-908.1 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 735), in accord with the rule requiring notice and an opportunity to be heard. However, this was not an acknowledgment of service or waiver of service of the bill of exceptions, as provided by Code §§ 6-911 and 6-912. It follows that this court is without jurisdiction of the writ of error and it must be dismissed. See Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123 (45 S. E. 2d 818); Carter v. State, 204 Ga. 242 (49 S. E. 2d 492); Henry v. Gillis, 204 Ga. 397 (50 S. E. 2d 73); State of Georgia, ex rel. Dawson, v. Denmark, 204 Ga. 464 (49 S. E. 2d 898); Irwin v. LeCraw, 206 Ga. 702 (58 S. E. 2d 383); Conley Housing Corp. v. Coleman, 210 Ga. 219 (78 S. E. 2d 503); and Nichols v. Nichols, 210 Ga. 232 (78 S. E. 2d 513).

Writ of error dismissed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.