Court Opinion

ID: 9444025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:38:41.244889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:41.298005
License: Public Domain

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge
(concurring specially).
I concur in the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed and in the reasons given therefor. I think though that our mandate should show that the affirmance of the judgment is without prejudice to the right of the appellant, conferred by the subpoena itself in the last clause, to make timely objection to and to have excluded from the record in the inquiry all checks or other documents which are irrelevant to the inquiry. I am of the opinion that this is the effect of the judgment below and of our affirmance of it. I think, though, that our opinion or our mandate should make this clear.