Court Opinion

ID: 8609095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:31:05.667674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.043613
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jose de Jesus Coronel Velazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap*557peals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s determination regarding continuous physical presence in the United States, Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Velazquez failed to establish his continuous physical presence in the United States during the 10 years prior to service of the notice to appear on November 26, 1997. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A), (d)(1). Velazquez offered no documentary evidence of his entry or presence in 1987, and neither he nor his uncle were able to explain why they recalled that Velazquez arrived in 1987 rather than 1988. Further, on his asylum application Velazquez gave 1988 as his first entry date.
We decline to consider Velazquez’s due process contentions regarding the IJ’s hardship finding because the BIA’s physical presence finding is dispositive and the BIA did not make a ruling on the IJ’s hardship finding.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.