Court Opinion

ID: 3898840
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:30:04.831654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:56:46.974958
License: Public Domain

Honorable Charles Evans Chairman, Committee on Government Organization House of Representatives Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Validity of taxing entities granting permissive freezes on ad valorem taxes for persons over the age of 65
Dear Representative Evans:
In 1979, the Texas Legislature enacted the Property Tax Code. Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 841, as amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 302, art. II, § 1 at 697. Section 11.26 of the code freezes the amount of ad valorem taxes which a school district can impose on residence homesteads of individuals over the age of 65 at the amount imposed the first year the homestead qualified for the exemption afforded by section 11.13(c). You ask whether taxing entities other than school districts may determine to freeze ad valorem taxes of persons over the age of 65.
In City of Beaumont v. Fertitta, 415 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. 1967), the Texas Supreme Court observed that `the Legislature does not need any constitutional authority to exempt property from taxation that is not required by the Constitution to be taxed.'415 S.W.2d at 910. Conversely, the legislature does need constitutional authority to exempt property from taxation if the constitution does require such property to be taxed. See also Dickson v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, 280 S.W.2d 315
(Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1955, writ ref'd). Article VIII, section 1 of the Constitution of Texas provides that all real and tangible personal property `shall be taxed in proportion to its value.' (Emphasis added).
Article VIII, section 1 further provides that `the Legislature . . . may exempt all or part of the personal property homestead of a family or single adult.' Sections 1-b(a) and 1-b(b) of article VIII exempt portions of the assessed taxable value of residence homesteads from ad valorem taxation. Section 1-b(c) provides that $5,000 of the market value of the residence homestead of an adult is exempt from ad valorem taxation for `general elementary and secondary public school purposes' and that the legislature may exempt up to $10,000 of the market value of the residence homestead of persons 65 years of age or older from ad valorem taxation for such purposes. Finally, section 1-b(d) provides that:
  Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, if a person receives the residence homestead exemption prescribed by Subsection (c) of this section for homesteads of persons sixty-five (65) years of age or older, the total amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on that homestead for general elementary and secondary public school purposes may not be increased while it remains the residence homestead of that person or that person's spouse who receives the exemption. However, those taxes may be increased to the extent the value of the homestead is increased by improvements other than repairs or improvements made to comply with governmental requirements. (Emphasis added).
The tax freeze which was first embodied in House Bill 1060, Acts 1979, 66th Legislature, chapter 302, article 7, section 7, at 691, and which now finds expression in section 11.26 of the Property Tax Code, is specifically authorized by article VIII, section 1-b(d) of the constitution.
We can find no constitutional authority that would permit taxing entities other than school districts to freeze the amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on residence homesteads of individuals over the age of 65. The constitutional provisions previously cited provide for across-the-board exemptions of portions of the assessed taxable value of residence homesteads from ad valorem taxes thereafter levied by the taxing entity. However, exempting a portion of the assessed taxable value of a homestead from taxes that may thereafter be levied is quite different from freezing those taxes at a certain figure for certain individuals. The underlined portion of article VIII, section 1-b(d), cited above, clearly indicates that constitutional authority exists only for freezes upon ad valorem taxes imposed for public school purposes, i.e., those collected by school districts. Because this is the only constitutional provision that permits freezes upon the taxes levied by a taxing entity, we conclude that taxing entities other than school districts are without constitutional authority to grant such freezes. If such tax freezes were permitted on selected classes of property without constitutional authority, an equal and uniform problem would arise. See Tex. Const. art. VIII, § 2.
We note, however, that article 7329a, V.T.C.S., prohibits cities and school districts from filing suit to collect delinquent ad valorem taxes on the residence homestead of persons sixty-five years or older. See Attorney General Opinion H-364 (1974). The uncollected taxes, penalties, and interest remain a first priority lien upon the land until paid.
 SUMMARY
Taxing entities other than school districts have no authority under the Constitution of Texas to freeze the amount of ad valorem taxes imposed upon the residence homesteads of persons 65 or older.
Very truly yours,
  Mark White Attorney General of Texas
  John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
  Richard E. Gray III Executive Assistant Attorney General
  Prepared by Jon Bible Assistant Attorney General