Court Opinion

ID: 3095628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:31:43.641137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:50.030014
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                          SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                               FORT WORTH

                              NO. 02-13-00098-CV

DEBRA PEMBERTON                                                      APPELLANT

                                        V.

ROBERT PEMBERTON                                                       APPELLEE

                                     ----------

          FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

                                     ----------

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION1

                                     ----------

      Following a bench trial, the trial court signed a final decree of divorce. In

the final decree, the trial court ordered that the parties’ unimproved lake lot be

sold to pay attorneys’ fees. Page nine of the final decree states:

           The net proceeds derived from the sale after costs of sale and
      payment of the receiver’s fee shall be as set out hereinbelow:

      1
       See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
       1.    The delinquent Homeowner’s Association              dues    and
             assessments paid in full off the top;

       2.    The balance of the net proceeds shall be divided 50/50
             between the attorneys for Petitioner, Mark J. Rosenfield, and
             the attorneys for Respondent, Michael Tresidder.

       3.    IT IS ORDERED that DEBRA PEMBERTON shall pay in full
             the ad valorem taxes, interest, and penalty due and owing on
             the said lake lot, as sanctions for Respondent’s prior discovery
             sanctions which were ordered and which were not paid by
             Respondent. [Interlineations included in original.]

       In their briefs, Appellant Debra Pemberton and Appellee Robert

Pemberton agree that there is an error in the final decree of divorce because it

fails to limit the award of attorneys’ fees to the amount of attorneys’ fees owed

and, depending on the value of the property at the time of the sale, could award

attorneys’ fees in excess of the amounts that were proven at trial. The parties

agree that a provision should be added to the final decree of divorce that any net

sales proceeds from the lake lot sale shall be divided equally between the parties

after the payment of attorneys’ fees. We agree and sustain Debra’s sole issue.

       Having sustained Debra’s sole issue, we modify the provision on page nine

of the final decree of divorce to contain the language agreed to by the parties:

“2.   The net sales proceeds shall be divided equally between Petitioner and

Respondent after payment of the attorneys’ fees that were proved at trial.” As

modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.     See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b)

(providing that appellate court may modify judgment and affirm as modified).

                                         2
                                        SUE WALKER
                                        JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 9, 2014

                                3