Court Opinion

ID: 9438827
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 06:05:43.643213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:25:56.978360
License: Public Domain

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge,
dissenting:
I agree with the majority’s conclusions that Petitioner Iris Dervin’s physical impairments are not disabling and that she is disabled due to a psychiatric impairment, but I dissent from the remainder of the majority’s decision. I would affirm the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Dervin was not entitled to a waiver of the overpayment of Social Security benefits payments because she was “at fault” for the overpayments. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.506 & 404.507. In my view, substantial evidence supported this decision. Because the majority would reverse on this issue, I dissent.