Court Opinion

ID: 4950666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 12:58:53.970083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:00:17.495601
License: Public Domain

[1] ORDER
[2] This case came before a hearing panel of this court for oral argument October 18, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why this appeal should not be summarily decided.
[3] The defendant, Gabriel Saback, has appealed from a Family Court order requiring him to pay the attorney's fees of the plaintiff, Theresa Saback. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we conclude that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be summarily decided.
[4] It appears that the trial justice certainly had the power to award counsel fees even though one of the parties was deceased.Centazzo v. Centazzo, 556 A.2d 560 (R.I. 1989). However, the counsel fee was ordered by the trial justice without analyzing or examining the ability of each party to pay. *Page 1222 
There was no consideration of the extent of plaintiffs assets at the time of her death.
[5] Consequently, this case is remanded to the Family Court with directions to consider the ability of each party to pay counsel fees. Whereupon an order respecting counsel fees may be issued in the discretion of the trial justice.
[6] MURRAY, J., did not participate.