Court Opinion

ID: 9401460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-13 14:02:13.986377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:53.283036
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-13876    Document: 20-1     Date Filed: 06/13/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-13876
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       TRENTON EDWARD WATKINS,

                                                  Defendant- Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00291-TFM-N-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-13876      Document: 20-1     Date Filed: 06/13/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-13876

       Before JORDAN, BRASHER, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Barre Dumas, appointed counsel for Trenton Watkins, has
       moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Watkins’s revocation of
       supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.