Court Opinion

ID: 1024379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:32:33.872258+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:14.966021
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 07-7035

ROWLAND A. WHEELER,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RICHARD CONWAY, Commonwealth Attorney,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00286)

Submitted:   November 15, 2007       Decided:    November 26, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rowland A. Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Rowland A. Wheeler appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   See Wheeler

v. Conway, No. 2:07-cv-00286 (E.D. Va. filed July 2, 2007 & entered

July 5, 2007).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -