Court Opinion

ID: 9282797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-29 14:05:15.273049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:12:58.103481
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.]

                           DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. REPP.
  [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.]
(No. 2021-0757—Submitted November 28, 2022—Decided November 29, 2022.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Judge Mark Edward Repp, Attorney
Registration No. 0058853, last known business address in Tiffin, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 9, 2021,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from
the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has complied with
that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, 165 Ohio St.3d
582, 2021-Ohio-3923, 180 N.E.3d 1128.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,
and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.
                                  _________________