Court Opinion

ID: 31853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 18:46:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:44.074736
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 25, 2003

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 03-10076
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LEE NASLUND,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:02-CR-69-1-C
                       --------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Jimmy

Lee Naslund on appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Naslund has filed no response.   Our independent review of

counsel’s brief, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 03-10076
                                 -2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.