Court Opinion

ID: 3071481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:36:34.101776+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:48.772899
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-14-00146-CR

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                  TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                             TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD WAYNE TAYLOR,                                       §   APPEAL FROM THE 159TH
APPELLANT

V.                                                          §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE                                                    §   ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             PER CURIAM
         Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal.         No decision has been
delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
Opinion delivered July 31, 2014.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

                                              (DO NOT PUBLISH)
                                 COURT OF APPEALS

     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                            JULY 31, 2014

                                        NO. 12-14-00146-CR

                                 RICHARD WAYNE TAYLOR,
                                         Appellant
                                            V.
                                   THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                         Appellee

                               Appeal from the 159th District Court
                      of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014-0049)

                  THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the
court below for observance.

                  By per curiam opinion.
                  Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.