Court Opinion

ID: 6144307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:55:58.097602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:47.946724
License: Public Domain

Jones J.
The authority of Mr. Philip, in this1 action as attorney for the defendant ceased on the entry of the judgment; and therefore defendant was at liberty to employ any other attorney to take such action in relation to the judgment and cause as he desired, without any order of substitution. The motion for substitution is therefore unneccessary, and for that reason is denied. If it is designed to obtain possession of papers now in Mr. Phillips hands, that must be done by an indepennant proceeding against him.
From the papers used on the motion, I think defendant derived the impression from his conversation with plaintiff ’s friends that this action so far as the action itself was concerned was abandoned and that there was no néccessity ior further attention to it. The defualt then was taken through the excusable neglect of the defendant.
*122Defendant must be let in to answer on payment of $10 costs of opposing this motion, the disbursments included in the judgment roll, and the sheriffs fees and expenses. The judgment and levy if any to stand as security. The defendant to consent to a reference to a referee to be named by the court if the plaintiff deserves it. Answer .to be put in in ten days. If there is a levy, and defendant desires to have it removed, he may do so by bringing the amount of plaintiff ’s claim and $100 into court, to the credit of this action to abide the event thereof, the same to be applied on motion of plaintiff " on notice to defendant to the payment of any judgment the plaintiff may recover herein, and the surplus to be repaid to the defendant.