Court Opinion

ID: 2355543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:13:41.503598+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:47.670274
License: Public Domain

239 S.W.3d 130 (2007)
Jerry Lee GODDARD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 89156.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
November 20, 2007.
*131 Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Jerry Lee Goddard, appeals the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order and judgment denying the movant's Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).