Court Opinion

ID: 6530533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 20:16:46.713993+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:21.013351
License: Public Domain

COHEN, J.
The State properly concedes that Zachary N. Linville’s motion for return of personal property was legally sufficient. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (noting that if motion for return of personal property is facially sufficient, trial court may order State to respond to motion or hold an evidentiary hearing).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.