Court Opinion

ID: 7315509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 21:06:09.149021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:19:37.178553
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Pressler’s opinion reported at 138 N. J. Super. 322 (Law Div. 1975).
*250We note that in the trial judge’s opinion the question of the viability of commercial contracts into which the Hudson-type municipalities have entered was reserved with leave granted to plaintiffs to move, if they so chose, with respect to any such contracts. 138 N. J. Super. at 342-343. Subsequent to Judge Pressler’s opinion plaintiffs filed a stipulation waiving any right they may have to challenge such contracts. The issue is therefore no longer in the case.