Court Opinion

ID: 5509673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 03:32:05.161472+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:07.915913
License: Public Domain

DYKMAN, J.
This is an appeal from an order affirming the report of grading commissioners, and the controlling facts are these: By a resolution of the board of supervisors of the county of Kings, passed September 13,1893, in pursuance of the authority of chapter 289 of the Laws of 1892, provision was made for the opening and draining of Fifth avenue, in the. town of New Utrecht. Commissioners were appointed, and the streets were opened. Thereupon grading commissioners were appointed. When the presentation of their report for confirmation took place, objections were made thereto by the appellants, who were the owners "of property within the assessment district. The objections were overruled, and the report. *142confirmed, and from the order of the confirmation the property owners have appealed to this court. The objections'are: First, in relation to the amount of the assessment; second, as to the legality of opening a portion of the avenue; and, third, that the commissioners have been legislated out of office.
No misconduct or misapprehension is charged upon the commissioners, and there is no claim that they adopted any illegal rule or principle in making their assessments. Under such circumstances, appellate tribunals refuse to interfere upon mere questions of amount, unless the sums awarded are so inadequate or so large as to be palpably unjust. No such case is presented by this record. The second objection requires no consideration. It is plainly frivolous. The third objection presents no error. These proceedings are special, and the commissioners appointed therein are not town officers, and cannot properly be denominated town officers.
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.