Court Opinion

ID: 7215435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 00:59:32.333659+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:59.685292
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Samuel Gregory Lemar appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for one count each of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, distribution of methylenediox-yamphetamine, and distribution of keta-mine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
At sentencing, the district court applied a two-level increase of the offense level for possession of a firearm under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l). Lemar contends the two-level increase was not warranted because there was no evidence indicating he or any of his co-conspirators possessed a firearm during the commission of their offenses.
We review for clear error the district court’s finding that the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of a narcotics offense. See United States v. Willis, 899 F.2d 873, 874 (9th Cir.1990). A criminal defendant can be held accountable for a firearm possessed by a co-conspirator, if the possession was reasonably foreseeable to the defendant as part of the criminal activity. See id. at 875 (holding that actual knowledge of a co-conspirator possessing a firearm qualifies as foreseeability). Lemar testified at sentencing that during narcotics transactions he knew that one of his co-conspirators carried a firearm. Accordingly, the district court appropriately granted the two-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.