Court Opinion

ID: 9825282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:29:27.146792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:39.242007
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Appellant’s resourceful counsel seem impressed that because the bill of exceptions recites that it contains “all the evidence in -the case” our court is bound by that recital.
But where the bill of exceptions shows on its face that it does not “contain all the evidence in the case,” the mere recital that it does, cannot avail.
Here, it affirmatively appears that neither the map introduced into the evidence as “State’s Exhibit A,” nor the one introduced into the evidence as “State’s Exhibit B,” is included in the bill of exceptions.
The application is overruled.
Application overruled.