Court Opinion

ID: 9951508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-18 10:10:20.721571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:41:23.148906
License: Public Domain

In the
        Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
         at Fort Worth
     ___________________________
          No. 02-24-00013-CV
     ___________________________

        KHODR SAFA, Appellant

                    V.

       LOUDY TAMER, Appellee

  On Appeal from the 467th District Court
          Denton County, Texas
      Trial Court No. 21-11159-467

  Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

        On February 8, 2024, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible

for preparing the record in this appeal had informed us that appellant had not

arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution unless, by February 20, 2024, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b),

44.3.

        Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

        Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

                                                       Per Curiam

Delivered: March 14, 2024

                                            2