Court Opinion

ID: 9619988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 05:36:30.979622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:46.450699
License: Public Domain

ROSS MAN, J.,
concurring.
Since the facts of this case, as submitted to us by the parties, lack Clarity and precision, I am reluctant to concur in the decision written by Mr. Justice Goodwin which I recognize as carefully reasoned. However, the disposition of the case which the decision will make will do no more than remand it for further attention. I hope that if the case comes before us again we will be afforded a clearer impression of the facts. Whenever a state agency or a court withholds compensation from a workman under a belief that the group of which he is a member is so related to another group that the latter’s action in a strike automatically affects the first group the relationship and its purported automatic effect should be capable -of proof. I hope that clear and cogent evidence will be forthcoming upon remand. The relationship between the two groups, whatever it may be, surely is capable of proof.