Court Opinion

ID: 9397160
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-24 18:01:32.014896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:22.036945
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11253    Document: 11-1     Date Filed: 05/24/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-11253
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       BRUCE LEE ASSAM,
       Green Oak Partners, LLC,
       LARRY BYRD,
       Accounts Manager, Prager Moving,
       ERIC THOMPSON,
       Police Detective,
       SARA BERNARD,
       Attorney at Holland & Knight, LLP,
       EDWARD TORRES,
USCA11 Case: 23-11253       Document: 11-1      Date Filed: 05/24/2023   Page: 2 of 3

       2                       Opinion of the Court                23-11253

       Investigative Process Services, Inc., et al.,

                                                       Defendants-Appellees.

                             ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01704-RBD-DCI
                           ____________________

       Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, AND BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to ﬁle a no-
       tice of appeal on or before May 31, 2022, which was the next busi-
       ness day after 30 days following the date judgment was deemed
       entered on the district court’s November 29, 2021 dismissal order.
       Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). How-
       ever, Lindberg did not ﬁle a notice of appeal until April 14, 2023.
              Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
       Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
       ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
       pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
       1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
USCA11 Case: 23-11253     Document: 11-1      Date Filed: 05/24/2023    Page: 3 of 3

       23-11253               Opinion of the Court                        3

       appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
       entertain an appeal that is out of time).
             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
       hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.