Court Opinion

ID: 8471143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 12:20:11.79367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:19.048129
License: Public Domain

*886Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Montgomery, No. 3:03-cr-00216-JRS-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.