Court Opinion

ID: 2665874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-04 08:12:58.654399+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:58.305422
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND
 ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION
 FUND, et al.,

        Plaintiffs,
                                                          Civil Action No. 10-105 (CKK)
        v.

 M-K SIGNS, INC., et al.,

        Defendants.

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                     (May 25, 2010)

       This action is brought by Plaintiffs International Painters and Allied Trades Industry

Pension Fund (the “Pension Fund”) and Gary J. Meyers, in his official capacity as a fiduciary

(“Meyers”), against Defendants M-K Signs, Inc. (“M-K Signs”) and Deco Graphic Systems, Inc.

(“Deco”), each doing business under various names (collectively, “Defendants”) for legal and

equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended

(“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs seek to recover unpaid contributions, liquidated

damages, interest and attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the Fund pursuant to 29 U.S.C.

§ 1132(g)(2)(A)-(D) and a collective bargaining agreement entered under 29 U.S.C. § 185 by

Defendants. Although properly and timely served with the Complaint and Summons, Defendants

failed to respond to the Complaint, and the Clerk of the Court, upon request by Plaintiffs, entered

default against Defendants on May 4, 2010. See Default, Docket No. [7]. Presently before the

Court is Plaintiffs’ [8] Motion for Judgment by Default by the Court Pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 55(b) Against Defendants. Having thoroughly considered the Complaint,
Plaintiffs’ submissions and attachments thereto, applicable case law, statutory authority, and the

record of the case as a whole, the Court shall GRANT Plaintiffs’ [8] Motion for Default

Judgment, for the reasons stated below.

                                       I. BACKGROUND

        The Pension Fund is a trust fund established under 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5), and its Trustees

are fiduciaries and plan administrators for the International Painters and Allied Trades Industry

Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”), which is a multiemployer employee benefit pension plan.

Compl. ¶¶ 4-5. The Pension Fund and Meyers are authorized collection agents for the Pension

Plan.

        As set forth in the Complaint, Plaintiffs assert that Defendant M-K Signs was a party to

or agreed to abide by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (“Labor Agreement”) with

one or more local labor unions or district councils affiliated with the International Union of

Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO, CLC (collectively, the “Union”). Compl. ¶ 12. Plaintiffs

also allege that the M-K Signs has agreed to abide by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust of

the Fund (“Trust Agreement”) as well as plan documents for the Pension Fund. Id. ¶ 13. Under

the Labor Agreement, the Trust Agreement, and the plan documents, M-K Signs agreed to make

certain contributions to the Pension Fund based on M-K Signs’ employees’ work, file monthly

remittance reports with the Pension Fund detailing all employees’ work for which contributions

were required, produce records necessary to permit the Pension Fund to conduct an audit, and

pay certain costs associated with litigation if M-K Signs failed to comply with its obligations. Id.

¶ 14. Plaintiffs allege that M-K Signs failed to make the required monthly payments for the

period from April 2009 through the present and that M-K Signs has otherwise failed to make

                                                 2
contributions required under the agreements. Id. ¶¶ 19-40. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Deco

is the alter ego, single employer, and/or successor of M-K Signs with knowledge of the debt

owed to the Pension Fund by M-K Signs. Id. ¶ 16.

       Pursuant to the terms of the various agreements, Plaintiffs assert that they are entitled to:

a monetary judgment against Defendants for violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1145 in the amount of the

unpaid contributions to the Pension Fund, liquidated damages, interest on the unpaid

contributions, as well as costs, audit expenses and attorneys’ fees (Count I); an audit of M-K

Signs’ records to determine the amounts owed (Count II); after an audit, a monetary judgment

against Defendants for violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1145 in the amount of the contributions found

due and owing by the audit, together with late charges, interest, liquidated damages, costs, and

fees (Count III); a monetary judgment against Defendants for breach of the Labor Agreement

(and its incorporated agreements) in the amount of unpaid funds owed, including liquidated

damages, interest and costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees (Count IV); and a monetary judgment

against Defendants for breach of the Labor Agreement (and its incorporated agreements) for

unpaid funds found due and owing by the audit (Count V). Compl. ¶¶ 19-40. Plaintiffs, in their

instant motion, have moved for default judgment seeking: (1) a declaration that M-K Signs and

Deco are jointly and severally liable as alter egos, joint employers, or a single employer, for the

debt of M-K Signs; (2) a judgment for $32,964.28, a sum known to be due and owing consisting

of unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs; (2) an order

declaring that the judgment shall continue to bear interest until the date of actual payment; and

(3) an order enjoining M-K Signs to submit to audit of their wage, payroll, and personnel records

and accurately complete and submit all outstanding remittance reports. See Pls.’ Proposed Order.

                                                  3
       Defendants were served with the Complaint and Summons on February 10, 2010, and

were therefore required to respond by March 3, 2010. See Notices of Filing Return of Service,

Docket Nos. [3]-[4]. Defendants failed to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’

Complaint, and Plaintiffs subsequently moved for entry of default. See Pls.’ Request to Clerk to

Enter Default, Docket No. [6]. On May 4, 2010, the Clerk of the Court entered default against

Defendants. See Default, Docket No. [7]. Plaintiffs subsequently filed the instant [8] Motion for

Judgment by Default. As of the date of this Memorandum Opinion, Defendants have not entered

an appearance nor filed any pleadings in this case.

                         II. LEGAL STANDARD AND DISCUSSION

       Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that the clerk of the court must enter a

party’s default “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has

failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R.

Civ. P. 55(a). After a default has been entered by the clerk of the court, a court may enter a

default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). “The determination of whether

default judgment is appropriate is committed to the discretion of the trial court.” Int’l Painters &

Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F. Supp. 2d 56, 57 (D.D.C.

2008) (citing Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980)).

       Where, as here, there is a complete “absence of any request to set aside the default or

suggestion by the defendant that it has a meritorious defense, it is clear that the standard for

default judgment has been satisfied.” Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F. Supp. 2d at 57 (internal

quotation marks omitted). The Clerk of the Court entered Defendant’s default, and the factual

allegations in the Complaint are therefore taken as true. See Int’l Painters & Allied Trades

                                                  4
Indus. Pension Fund v. R.W. Armine Drywall Co., Inc., 239 F. Supp. 2d 26, 30 (D.D.C. 2002).

Although the default establishes a defendant’s liability, the Court makes an independent

determination of the sum to be awarded in the judgment unless the amount of damages is certain.

Adins v. Teseo, 180 F. Supp. 2d 15, 17 (D.D.C. 2001).

       Plaintiffs seek a monetary judgment against both M-K Signs and Deco for the amount of

delinquent contributions, liquidated damages, interest, and an award of attorneys’ fees. The

Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Complaint sufficiently alleges facts to support their claims. See

Compl. Exs. 1(a)-(b) (Agreements between M-K Signs and the Union). Plaintiffs are thus

entitled to default judgment as to Defendants’ liability for their failure to timely pay contributions

to the Pension Fund and to supply records necessary to permit the Pension Fund to determine if

Defendants are making the payments as required under the terms of Labor Agreement, the Trust

Agreement, the plan documents for the Pension Fund, and other related agreements.

       A.      Alter Ego Liability

       “In the ERISA context, alter ego liability enables ERISA trustees to ‘recover delinquent

contributions from a sham entity used to circumvent the participating employer’s pension

obligations.’” Flynn v. Veazey Constr. Corp., 424 F. Supp. 2d 24, 33 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting

Flynn v. R.C. Tile, 353 F.3d 953, 958 (D.C. Cir. 2004)). “The purpose of alter ego liability is to

prevent employers from evading their obligations under labor laws and collective bargaining

agreements through the device of making a mere technical change in the structure or identity of

the employing entity . . . without making any substantial change in its ownership or

management.” Id. (quotation marks and citation omitted). When determining whether two

businesses are alter egos for purposes of ERISA § 515, courts evaluate “the similarities between

                                                  5
the two enterprises in their ownership, management, business purpose, operations, equipment,

and customers.” R.C. Tile, 353 F.3d at 958.1

       Here, Plaintiffs have alleged in their Complaint that Deco and M-K Signs have identical

officers and management, serve the same or similar customer based, share the same employees

and equipment, operate out of the same business address, and shared awareness of M-K Signs’

obligations to the Pension Fund. See Compl. ¶ 15. In addition, Plaintiffs have produced

evidence in the form of a declaration and supporting exhibits demonstrating that both M-K Signs

and Deco share the same owners, officers, address, business purpose, and customer base. See

Pls.’ Mot. for J. by Default, Exs. 1 (Decl. of Thomas Montefore), 2a (Corp. File Detail Report for

Deco Graphic Systems), 2b (Corp. File Detail Report for M-K Signs, Inc.). Therefore, based on

the allegations in the Complaint and the evidence submitted with Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court

finds that a default judgment may be entered against Deco as the alter ego of M-K Signs.

       B.      Judgment for Damages Ascertainable Without an Audit

       Under Section 515 of ERISA, “[e]very employer who is obligated to make contributions

to a multiemployer plan under the terms of the plan or under the terms of a collectively bargained

agreement shall . . . make such contributions in accordance with the terms and conditions of such

plan or such agreement.” 29 U.S.C. § 1145. When an employer fails to make such contributions,

       1
         The D.C. Circuit suggested in R.C. Tile that when the two businesses are incorporated, a
more rigorous analysis may be required the general presumption that a corporation’s existence is
presumed to be separate, citing Greater Kansas City Laborers Pension Fund v. Superior General
Contractors, Inc., 104 F.3d 1050, 1055 (8th Cir. 1997). See 353 F.ed at 958 n.***. However,
this Court agrees with the other Judges in this District who have determined that the standards
applied in R.C. Tile should apply to cases involving incorporated businesses. See Flynn v.
Interior Finishes, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 2d 38, 52 n.15 (D.D.C. 2006) (Kennedy, J.); Flynn v. Ohio
Bldg. Restoration Inc., 317 F. Supp. 2d 22, 29-33 (D.D.C. 2004) (Walton, J.).

                                                6
ERISA provides that the fiduciary for a plan may bring an action and obtain a mandatory award

for the plan consisting of:

       (A) the unpaid contributions,

       (B) interest on the unpaid contributions,

       (C) an amount equal to the greater of–

               (i) interest on the unpaid contributions; or

               (ii) liquidated damages provided for under the plan in an amount not in
               excess of 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under
               Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the Court under
               Subparagraph (a),

       (D) reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant,
       and

       (E) such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.

29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2). Interest is calculated using the rate provided under the plan, or, if none,

the rate prescribed by 26 U.S.C. § 6621. Id. In addition to the remedies available under ERISA,

a benefit trust fund may, as a third-party beneficiary, recover for breach of a collective bargaining

agreement under 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). See Hudson County Carpenters Union Local Union No. 6.

v. V.S.R. Constr. Corp., 127 F. Supp. 2d 565, 568 (D.N.J. 2000) (“It is well-established that the

failure to make contributions to a union trust fund as required by a collective bargaining

agreement constitutes a violation of ERISA § 515 and a violation of [29 U.S.C. § 185].”); see

also Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1357-60 (7th Cir. 1983) (explaining that ERISA

remedies are intended to supplement rather than supersede rights existing under 29 U.S.C. §

185(a)).

       Plaintiffs have provided the Court with affidavits to support a damages award of

                                                   7
$32,964.28. Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that based on reports prepared by M-K Signs and

submitted to the Pension Fund, Defendants owe at least $20,731.66 in unpaid contributions for

the period from April 2009 to March 2010. See Pls.’ Mot. for J. by Default, Ex. 1 (Decl. of

Thomas Montemore) ¶ 8. Plaintiffs have also calculated that Defendants owe interest on the

unpaid amounts through April 30, 2010, in the amount of $437.32, based on the unpaid

contributions and the fluctuating IRS interest rate as provided in § 10 of the industry pension

plan, which adopts the ERISA standard. See id. ERISA also provides that liquidated damages be

awarded in the amount of 20% of unpaid contributions, which equals $4146.33. See id.

       Plaintiffs also ask for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $7627.12. See Pls.’ Mot.

for J. by Default, Ex. 4 (Decl. of Elizabeth Coleman) ¶ 2. Plaintiffs have attached supporting

documentation showing that they have incurred $6723.00 in attorneys’ fees and $904.12 in costs

in litigating this action. See Pls.’ Mot. for J. by Default, Ex. 5 (May 2010 Attorneys’ Fees, Time

and Expense Details). This is based on 30.9 hours of attorney and paralegal time at rates of $220

per hour and $70 per hour, respectively, plus expenses for the filing fee, photocopies, and various

other items. See id. Plaintiffs have provided documentation showing that these rates are

reasonable for the services rendered. Accordingly, the Court shall award the attorneys’ fees and

costs requested. Thus, the total money judgment for Plaintiffs ascertainable without an audit

shall be $32,964.28.

       C.      Audit and Remittance Forms

       The Pension Fund utilizes audits to ensure that employers are providing accurate

information regarding the eligibility of employees and required contributions. See Pls.’ Mot. for

J. by Default, Ex. 1 (Decl. of Thomas Montemore) ¶ 9. The Labor Agreement and the Trust

                                                 8
Agreement require Defendant to allow for audits. See Compl., Exs. 1(a)-(b) (Labor

Agreements), art. XVI, § 16.01(3); id., Ex. 2 (Trust Agreement), art. VI, § 6. These audits are

necessary in order to determine the exact amount of Defendants’ delinquency. The Court finds

that Plaintiffs have shown they are entitled to audit Defendants’ records, as provided for under

the relevant agreements. The Court shall therefore order Defendants to make available to

Plaintiffs, within twenty (20) days of service of this Court’s Order upon it, all wage, payroll, and

personnel and related records necessary for Plaintiffs to ascertain the precise amount of any

delinquent contributions due and owing to Plaintiffs for all periods in which Defendants are

obligated to make fringe benefit contributions to the Plaintiffs. Defendant shall bear the costs of

said audit. Plaintiffs also indicate that Defendants have failed to submit timely remittance

reports, upon which Plaintiffs rely in order to make benefit payments and calculations. See Pls.’

Mot. for J. by Default, Ex. 1 (Decl. of Thomas Montemore) ¶ 10. The Court shall therefore order

that Defendants fully and accurately complete and submit to the Pension Fund any and all

outstanding remittance reports with the required information for each employee, including hours

worked, wages paid, and contributions owed for that month, together with a check for the amount

of contributions owed.

//

//

//

//

//

//

                                                 9
                                       III. CONCLUSION

       For the reasons set forth above, the Court shall GRANT Plaintiffs’ [8] Motion for

Judgment by Default. The Court shall award damages in the amount of $32,964.28, order

Defendants to provide all outstanding remittance reports and provide books and records for an

audit, and order other appropriate relief.

Date: May 25, 2010
                                                         /s/
                                                   COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY
                                                   United States District Judge

                                              10