Court Opinion

ID: 2991024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 03:51:21.75628+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:42.486428
License: Public Domain

Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed December 2, 2011.

                                           In The

                          Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                        ____________

                                  NO. 14-11-00989-CV
                                    ____________

                          ROBERTO HINOJOSA, Appellant

                                             V.

                          BRITTANY HINOJOSA, Appellee

                       On Appeal from the County Court No. 3
                              Galveston County, Texas
                         Trial Court Cause No. 10-FD-3116

                              ABATEMENT ORDER

      Appellant brings this appeal from a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. On
November 29, 2011, appellant asked this court to suspend enforcement of the judgment
affecting conservatorship or custody.

      Section 109.002(c) of the Texas Family Code and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
24.2(a)(4) permit suspension of enforcement of a judgment involving conservatorship or
custody only if ordered by the trial court. The appellate court reviewing the trial court’s
decision, however, may order suspension, with or without security, “upon proper showing.”
Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a)(4). Proper showing requires the movant “to demonstrate that the trial
court clearly abused its discretion in refusing to suspend its judgment on presentation of
essentially the same matters offered to the appellate court.” McGee v. Ponthieu, 634 S.W.2d
780 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1982, no writ). The appellate court cannot consider any evidence
not previously presented to the trial court for its determination on the issue of judgment
suspension.

       We abate this appeal to permit appellant an opportunity to request suspension of
enforcement of the judgment from the trial court. The trial court’s findings on appellant’s
motion shall be included in a supplemental record to be filed with this court on or before
January 3, 2012.

       The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court=s
findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an
appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate
the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to
request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this
Court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial
court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

       It is so ORDERED.

                                       PER CURIAM

                                              2