Court Opinion

ID: 9768637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 11:08:28.892352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:42.838065
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                        NO. 03-22-00488-CR

                                 Troy Allen Dennis, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                     The State of Texas, Appellee

              FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
      NO. CR2018-048, THE HONORABLE STEPHANIE BASCON, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Appellant Troy Allen Dennis was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault

of a child younger than six years of age and sentenced to life imprisonment. See Tex. Penal

Code § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (f)(1).

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.          The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that she sent copies of

the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record

and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See
Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at

744. Appellant filed a pro se response on July 27, 2023.

               We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of

the trial and sentencing proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se

response—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at

766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.

               Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.          The trial court’s judgment of

conviction is affirmed.

                                             __________________________________________
                                             Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Affirmed

Filed: August 25, 2023

Do Not Publish

                                                2