Court Opinion

ID: 558174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:10:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:15.809118
License: Public Domain

929 F.2d 691Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.David BRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Saundra E. BANKS, Court Clerk, Baltimore City Circuit Court,Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-6688.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 21, 1990.Decided March 28, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.  (CA-90-2491-N)
David Bright, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying relief.  We have examined Bright's case construed as both a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit and as a petition for writ of mandamus.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bright v. Banks, CA-90-2491-N (D.Md. Oct. 10, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.