Court Opinion

ID: 994101
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:17:40.482223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:42.014665
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7432

JAMES EDMOND WATTS,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN B. METZGER, III; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD;
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-946-R)

Submitted:   January 13, 1998             Decided:   January 26, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edmond Watts, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. Watts v. Metzger, No. CA-96-946-R (W.D. Va.
Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2