Court Opinion

ID: 7022138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 04:49:13.455111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:10:36.006175
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The Memorandum filed January 11, 2001, is withdrawn and the attached Memorandum is to be filed in its place.
MEMORANDUM2
This appeal from an order denying a request for a preliminary injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our review of an order regarding preliminary injunctive relief “is much more limited than review of an order involving a permanent injunction, where all conclusions of law are freely reviewable.” Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc., 198 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir.1999). We review for abuse of discretion, which occurs only if the district court based its decision either on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous factual findings. Id.
We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion here.
The district court’s denial of the request for a preliminary injunction is therefore AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.