Court Opinion

ID: 9881776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-03 21:00:49.491594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:18.093006
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1430      Doc: 16         Filed: 10/02/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1430

        MARLA F. CRAWFORD,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
        James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:20-cv-00048-JKB)

        Submitted: September 28, 2023                                     Decided: October 2, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A.,
        Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1430         Doc: 16      Filed: 10/02/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Marla F. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying her summary judgment

        motion and granting Defendant summary judgment in Crawford’s employment

        discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal

        brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The

        informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited

        to issues preserved in that brief.”). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the

        arguments Crawford raises on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s order. Crawford v. Prince George’s Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 8:20-

        cv-00048-JKB (D. Md. filed Mar. 21, 2023 & entered Mar. 22, 2023). We deny all pending

        motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     2