Court Opinion

ID: 9391739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-03 06:10:35.17234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:44.220112
License: Public Domain

DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 28, 2023

                                   S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-22-00992-CV

                       AVA SECURITY, INC., Appellant
                                  V.
                       RASPBERRY 353 LLC, Appellee

               On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-04881

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Reichek, and Miskel
                            Opinion by Justice Reichek
      Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal because

they have settled their differences. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal

with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

                                           /Amanda L. Reichek/
                                           AMANDA L. REICHEK
                                           JUSTICE
220922F.P05
                                  S
                           Court of Appeals
                    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                  JUDGMENT

AVA SECURITY, INC., Appellant               On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial
                                            District Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-22-00992-CV        V.                Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-04881.
                                            Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek.
RASPBERRY 353 LLC, Appellee                 Justices Partida-Kipness and Miskel
                                            participating.

    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

      It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 28, 2023

                                      –2–