Court Opinion

ID: 1001502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:56:32.205254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:42.753929
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-6186

THURMOND WILFORD RANKIN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-00-3-3)

Submitted:   April 27, 2000                    Decided:   May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurmond Wilford Rankin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Thurmond Wilford Rankin appeals the magistrate judge’s order

conditionally filing his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.    This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).      The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

     We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2