Court Opinion

ID: 2944708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 02:53:32.661832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:35:46.922449
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-53,613-10 and WR-53,613-11

EX PARTE LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN

ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE
NO. 99-11-06435-CR FROM THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per Curiam.  Keller, P.J., and Meyers, Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., would
dismiss.

O R D E R

	We have before us an application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5.  
	In June 2000, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder.  The jury
answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article
37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant's punishment at death.  This Court
affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal.  Swearingen v. State, 101
S.W.3d 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).  On March 11, 2002, applicant filed in the trial court his
initial application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071.  We denied relief. 
Ex parte Swearingen, No. WR-53,613-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May 21, 2003)(not designated
for publication).  On January 22, 2007, applicant filed a subsequent application in the
convicting court.  We remanded six of his claims to the convicting court for resolution.  After
the case was returned to this Court, we reviewed the findings of the convicting court, adopted
them, and denied relief.  Ex parte Swearingen, No. WR-53,613-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 16,
2008)(not designated for publication).  
	On January 16, 2008, applicant filed a second subsequent application in the convicting
court.  We remanded two of his claims to the convicting court for resolution.  After the case
was returned to this Court, we reviewed the findings of the convicting court, adopted them,
and denied relief.  Ex parte Swearingen, No. WR-53,613-05 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 17,
2008)(not designated for publication).  On January 23, 2009, applicant filed a pro se
subsequent application in the convicting court, and, on the same day, his attorney filed
another subsequent application raising twelve claims.  This Court dismissed both of those
applications in separate orders.  Ex parte Swearingen, No. WR-53,613-08 (Tex. Crim. App.
Jan. 27, 2009)(not designated for publication), and Ex parte Swearingen, No. WR-53,613-09
(Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 27, 2009)(not designated for publication).  
	The current "Successor Application" was filed in the convicting court on June 22,
2011.  In the application, applicant raises a single claim of actual innocence.  On July 11,
2011, applicant filed in the convicting court a pleading entitled a "Supplemental Briefing to
the Sixth Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus."  Because this pleading raises a new and
separate allegation of a due process violation, it is properly designated to be a subsequent
application.  We have reviewed both applications and find that they meet the requirements
of Article 11.071 § 5.  Accordingly, we stay applicant's execution currently scheduled for
Thursday, August 18, 2011, and remand both applications to the trial court to review and
resolve the claims raised.   
	IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 28th DAY OF JULY, 2011.
Do Not Publish