Court Opinion

ID: 9713742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 05:21:38.661581+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:20.274685
License: Public Domain

POMEROY, Justice
(concurring).
I concur in the result but do not join in the opinion of the Court because it involves a retrospective application of the exclusionary rule first announced in Commonwealth v. Futch, 447 Pa. 389, 290 A.2d 417 (1972). See the dissenting opinion of this writer in Commonwealth v. Johnson, 459 Pa. 171, 327 A.2d 618, 620 (1974) and the opinions therein cited. See also Commonwealth v. Wilson, - Pa. -, - n. 6, 329 A.2d 881, 884 n. 6 (1974). (Opinion in support of affirmance).