Court Opinion

ID: 994407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:22:45.311213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:57.130264
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHRISTOPHER E. REESE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria.    T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-91-468-A, CA-97-1826)

Submitted:   February 26, 1998            Decided:   March 19, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher E. Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Peti-

tion for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Our review of the record and

the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Reese, Nos. CR-91-468-A; CA-97-1826 (E.D. Va. Oct. 15,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2