Court Opinion

ID: 3102517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:23:45.987257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:50.231360
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                    San Antonio, Texas
                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
                             Nos. 04-14-00148-CR & 04-14-00149-CR

                                     Charles Ray PRINGLER,
                                             Appellant

                                               v.
                                          The STATE of
                                       The STATE of Texas,
                                             Appellee

                    From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                          Trial Court Nos. 2013CR7950 & 2013CR7951
                             Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:         Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                 Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 21, 2014

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

           On February 27, 2014, Appellant Charles Pringler was convicted of the offense of

possession of a controlled substance in cause number 2013-CR-7950 and escape from a

correctional facility in cause number 2013-CR-7951. The jury assessed punishment, respectively,

at five years and nine years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice. Appellate counsel was appointed in both cases on February 28, 2014. The record

does not contain a written notice of appeal. Although the record indicates that Pringler gave oral
                                                                    04-14-00148-CR & 04-14-00149-CR

notice of appeal in open court, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(c) requires the notice “be

given in writing and filed with the trial court clerk.” TEX. R. APP. PROC. 25.2(c).

         On April 22, 2014, this court ordered Appellant to show cause as to why this appeal should

not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On May 6, 2014, appellate counsel filed a response

requesting this court construe the trial court’s hand-written notation “Oral Notice of Appeal given

in open court on record, by pro se Defendant” as written notice of appeal. The trial court’s note

was located on the trial court’s docket statement dated February 27, 2014. Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 25.2(c)(1) requires “Notice be given in writing and filed with the trial court.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). We decline to construe the trial court’s written comments regarding an oral

request by a defendant as written notification. Id.

         Absent a timely-filed, written notice of appeal of a criminal conviction, this court lacks

jurisdiction over the appeal. Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522 (“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to

invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.”); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App.

1988).

         This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                   PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                 -2-