Court Opinion

ID: 8451490
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:35:13.541727+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.035449
License: Public Domain

*112MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner D. Moore, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because Moore did not properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing his complaint in federal court. See Ngo v. Woodford, 539 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.