Court Opinion

ID: 5468149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:09:10.228917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:11.817224
License: Public Domain

Barculo, Justice.
Under the former practice this would have been an action of replevin, and if brought in the Common Pleas full costs of that court would have been recovered. But under the present system no such rule obtains. Section 304 of the Code provides that “ in an action to recover the possession of personal property, if the plaintiff recover less than fifty dollars damages, he shall recover no more costs than damages, unless he recovers also property, the value of which, with the damages, amounts to fifty dollars.” Under this provision the plaintiff can recover only six cents costs—that being the amount of his damages. The precise point was decided under a similar statute in Rogers agt. Arnold, (12 Wen. 30,) where the court say the plaintiff “ should have brought his suit in the Common Pleas.”
I am aware of the hardship of this rule where the plaintiff cannot bring his action in a court of a justice of the peace, nor recover costs in a court of record. But we have nothing to do with framing statutes. The plaintiff is another victim of the Code.
The motion must be granted, but without costs.