Court Opinion

ID: 1015418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:32:50.032407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:14.606644
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 04-7595

ANTHONY STOKES,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN, RED ONION STATE PRISON,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-04-26-3)

Submitted:   January 24, 2005          Decided:     February 10, 2005

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Stokes, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Anthony Stokes seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the

district court that Stokes has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.   See Stokes v. Warden, Red

Onion State Prison, No. CA-04-26-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2004).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                              - 2 -