Court Opinion

ID: 1003260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:23:48.21303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:11.530762
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7489

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LACARLOS QUANIQUE DAVID,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-9, CA-00-97-4)

Submitted:   December 15, 2000            Decided:   January 5, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LaCarlos Quanique David, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reinke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     LaCarlos Quanique David seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-

97-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000).        We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2