Court Opinion

ID: 9910046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-14 19:07:09.379148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:42.366005
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Sims, 2023-Ohio-4538.]

                               COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

                              EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO,                                   :

                 Plaintiff-Appellant,            :
                                                                 No. 112598
                 v.                              :

MAYLON SIMS,                                     :

                 Defendant-Appellee.             :

                                JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

                 JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED
                 RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: December 14, 2023

          Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
                              Case No. CR-22-675237-A

                                           Appearances:

                 Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
                 Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting
                 Attorney, for appellant.

                 Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
                 Noelle A. Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, P.J.:

                Appellant, the state of Ohio (“the state”), appeals the trial court’s journal

entry sentencing appellee, Maylon Sims (“Sims”), to a definite prison term of four

years, contrary to the provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law. After thoroughly
reviewing the facts of this case and the applicable law, we reverse and remand to the

trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

                       I. Factual and Procedural History

             This matter involved the theft of a vehicle in which the victim’s son, who

was ten years old, was asleep in the backseat. The vehicle was stolen from Euclid

and driven to East Cleveland, at which point the driver woke up the child and told

him to get out of the vehicle. The child was dropped off at an elementary school

around 8:30 p.m. He walked around and found someone to call the police for him

and was eventually reunited with his mother.

             The vehicle was recovered the next day.         The steering wheel was

swabbed for DNA, which came back as belonging to Sims. The victim’s phone was

in the vehicle when it was stolen, and police were able to obtain cell phone tower

information showing the location of the phone.

             Sims pled guilty to one count of attempted kidnapping, a felony of the

second degree, in violation of R.C. 2905.01(B) and 2923.02; and one count of grand

theft, a felony of the fourth degree, in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A).

             The court imposed a definite four-year prison term for the attempted

kidnapping offense and 18 months in prison for the grand theft charge, to run

concurrently. It is undisputed that, pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law, the trial

court was required to impose an indefinite sentence for appellant’s second-degree

felony offense. The trial court, however, declared the Reagan Tokes Law

unconstitutional, finding that it violated the right to trial by jury, the doctrine of
separation of powers, and the right to due process and declined to sentence Sims

under it.

             The state then filed the instant appeal, raising one assignment of error

for our review:

      The trial court plainly erred when it found S.B. 201 to be
      unconstitutional and did not impose an indefinite sentence pursuant to
      S.B. 201.

                               II. Law and Analysis

             Pursuant to R.C. 2953.08(B)(2), the state has the right to appeal a

sentence that is contrary to law. A sentence that fails to impose a mandatory

provision is contrary to law. State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365, 2010-Ohio-

1, 922 N.E.2d 923, ¶ 21.

             In its sole assignment of error, the state argues that the trial court

plainly erred when it did not impose an indefinite sentence pursuant to S.B. 201. In

response to the state’s appeal, Sims argues that the trial court was correct in its

determination that the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional for the reasons stated

above.

             In State v. Hacker, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-2535, the Supreme

Court of Ohio recently addressed similar arguments and found the Reagan Tokes

Law to be constitutional.1 The Hacker Court determined the law does not violate

      1 Sims acknowledges that the Supreme Court of Ohio determined in Hacker that

indefinite sentences imposed pursuant to S.B. 201 are constitutional; however, he
presents his arguments “for the purpose of issue preservation in the event that there is
future litigation which could result in relief for Mr. Sims.”
the separation-of-powers doctrine, the right to a jury trial, or the right to due

process. Id. at ¶ 41. In light of this ruling, as well as the fact that Sims’s arguments

do not present novel issues or any new theory challenging the constitutional validity

of any aspect of the Reagan Tokes Law left unaddressed by the Hacker Court, we

sustain the state’s sole assignment of error.

              Judgment reversed, and case remanded to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

      It is ordered that appellant recover from appellee costs herein taxed.

      The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

      It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.

      A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27

of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________________________
FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, PRESIDING JUDGE

LISA B. FORBES, J., and
MICHAEL JOHN RYAN, J., CONCUR