Court Opinion

ID: 9625346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 07:37:24.989651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:06:06.867241
License: Public Domain

Schwellenbach, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part)—I concur with the majority that the proposed statement of facts was timely served and filed and was filéd in good faith; that the adverse party on whom it was served did not propose any amendments within ten days after such service.
I believe that we should direct the trial judge to certify that the matters and proceedings embodied in the statement of facts are matters and proceedings occurring in said cause, and the same are made a part of the record therein. He should further certify that the same contains such facts, matters, and proceedings theretofore occurring in the cause and not already a part of the record therein, as the parties have agreed to be material therein.
Such a certificate would comply with Rule on Appeal 37, 34A Wn. (2d) 40, and it would not require the trial judge to certify to any uncertain matter.