Court Opinion

ID: 2823948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-07 16:01:24.903908+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:31:11.665837
License: Public Domain

Citation Nr: 1528193	
Decision Date: 06/30/15    Archive Date: 07/09/15

DOCKET NO.  09-12 283	)	DATE
	)
	)

On appeal from the
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Atlanta, Georgia

THE ISSUES

1.  Entitlement to service connection for a cervical spine disability.

2.  Entitlement to service connection for a bilateral foot disability.

REPRESENTATION

Appellant represented by:	Georgia Department of Veterans Services

WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL

Appellant

ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

R. Erdheim, Counsel 
INTRODUCTION

The Veteran served on active duty from January 1973 to January 1976.

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a May 2007 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Atlanta, Georgia.

The Veteran testified before a Veterans Law Judge at a Travel Board hearing in September 2012.  That Judge has since retired and is no longer at the Board.  However, in light of the death of the Veteran and dismissal of the appeal, no further action is required.

FINDING OF FACT

VA has received notice that the Veteran passed away during the pendency of the appeal.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of these claims at this time.  38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2014); but see Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

Unfortunately, the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal.  As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths.  Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).  This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302. 

In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran.  38 C.F.R. § 20.1106. 

The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion.  Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death.  See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008) (creating new 38 U.S.C. § 5121A , substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008).  As provided for in this new provision, a person eligible for substitution will include "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ....".  The Secretary will be issuing regulations governing the rules and procedures for substitution upon death.  Until such regulations are issued, an eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the RO from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision).

ORDER

The appeal is dismissed.

____________________________________________
M. E. LARKIN
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals

Department of Veterans Affairs