Court Opinion

ID: 1020576
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:53:31.914954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:04:34.181121
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6666

JOHN TIMOTHY SMITH,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LACORICK BRIDGES; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.   Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (2:04-cv-23334-PMD)

Submitted: September 28, 2006              Decided: October 6, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,
O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          John Timothy Smith appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.    We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.      Smith v. Bridges,

No. 2:04-cv-23334-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2005).       We deny Smith’s

motion for appointment of counsel.    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                            AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -