Court Opinion

ID: 2966026
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:47:52.112285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:13:28.452553
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No. 98-1262

          THE GREAT WEST-LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,

                      Plaintiffs, Appellees,

                                v.

                          OMAR S. ZAKI,

                      Defendant, Appellant.

           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

            [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]

                              Before

                     Boudin, Circuit Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
     Omar S. Zaki on brief pro se.
     Robert L. Hamer, Robert B. Gibbons, Mirick, O'Connell,
DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, Joseph F. Ryan, Lyne, Woodworth & Evarts
LLP, Philip M. Howe and Lecomte, Emanuelson, Montejunas & Doyle on
brief for appellees.

October 6, 1999

  
            Per Curiam.    By order of November 4, 1998, we
  postponed the processing of this appeal from a post-judgment
  charging order to avoid the possibility of piecemeal review. 
  Appellees have informed us that all of the district court
  motions by and against the reach and apply defendant, Anne L.
  Zaki, have been withdrawn.  The district court proceedings now
  have concluded, and no appeal has been taken by Anne L. Zaki. 
            Reviewing the arguments relating to appellant Omar S.
  Zaki's interests in the light of the slim record thus properly
  before us, the order is affirmed.  Below, appellant did not
  squarely present in a timely fashion the arguments about his
  own interests which he seeks to raise here, but merely denied
  having an interest in the partnership.  His arguments about the
  rights and prerogatives of the IRS and Anne L. Zaki also are
  not properly before us. 
            Accordingly, insofar as the charging order determines
  appellees' rights against appellant Omar S. Zaki and any
  interest which appellant Zaki may have in the limited
  partnership, the judgment is affirmed.