Court Opinion

ID: 5561047
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:50:35.900506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:28.647725
License: Public Domain

Blandeord, Justice.
1. The controlling question in this case is, whether land sold under a justice’s court execution, upon which there was no entry of “ no personal property to be found,” transfers and conveys the title to the purchaser.
The uniform decisions of this court, commencing with Hopkins vs. Burch, 3 Kelly, 222, down to the present time, have been, even under the act of 1811, that there must be an entry of “ no personal property to be found,” before the constable is authorized to-make the levy upon land. This principle, decided so early as 1847, has been incorporated in the Code of Georgia, and now forms a part of the statute law of this state. Code, §4172 (b).
So it must follow that a deed of conveyance, made by a sheriff under a justice’s court fi. fa., of land, upon which there was no entry of no personal property to be found on said execution, is void, and conveys no title.
2. It has been repeatedly held by this court, that the officer making the levy could make the entry nunc pro tunc, of no personal property to be found. If the officer has gone out of office, then it is too late to have the entry made, and it cannot be done. Code, §3645, 3948; 68 Ga., 585. But the plaintiff's in the present case made no effort, *528and did not seek to have this entry of the constable corrected, as the law authorized.
The plaintiffs having rested their case upon a deed made by the sheriff, under a sale made by virtue of a justice’s court execution, upon which there was no entry of “ no personal property to be found,” the court was right to award a non-suit in this case, and his judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.