Court Opinion

ID: 9353768
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-12 19:01:09.980672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:11:36.987541
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10494        Document: 00516608326             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/12/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-10494
                                                                                     FILED
                                                                               January 12, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                     Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Gerardo Valentin-Garcia,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 3:21-CR-202-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Davis, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo
   Valentin-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). The defendant has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10494    Document: 00516608326         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/12/2023

                                 No. 22-10494

   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2