Court Opinion

ID: 822895
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 16:20:09.271142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:32.713865
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

     ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,
              Plaintiff-Appellant,

                           v.

               ACTSOFT, INC.,
   OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
   AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND
             EQUIPMENT, INC.,
             Defendants-Appellees.
             ____________________

                       2012-1066
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and
08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.
                  ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

      MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of
Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With
him on the brief were PHILIP S. LORENZO and JAMES E.
DALLNER.
       KYLE B. FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar,
LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee.
With him on the brief were TODD R. TUCKER and
NICHOLAS J. GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on
the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee
& Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc.
                   ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                       ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 1, 2013                    /s/ Jan Horbaly
   Date                             Jan Horbaly
                                       Clerk