Court Opinion

ID: 9391201
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-01 15:08:23.86121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:40.057771
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued April 25, 2023

                                        In The

                                Court of Appeals
                                       For The

                           First District of Texas
                              ————————————
                                NO. 01-23-00279-CR
                             ———————————
                      IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

             Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a

petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus

directing the trial court to “[s]et [a]sid[e] the [i]ndictment for failure to [c]ompel a

[s]peedy [t]rial.”1

1
      The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110,
      in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill
      presiding.
      Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that he has failed to

establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7,

52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly,

we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           2