Court Opinion

ID: 4273717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-09 18:00:19.652895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:52:28.566862
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10667      Document: 00514465201         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/09/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-10667                              FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                         May 9, 2018
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN SALAZAR-SANCHEZ, also known as Mario Ayala Guzman, also
known as Manuel Barreto-Sanchez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:16-CR-291-1

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Juan Salazar-Sanchez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Salazar-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10667    Document: 00514465201    Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/09/2018

                                No. 17-10667

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2