Court Opinion

ID: 9592061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:10:14.419079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:14.858621
License: Public Domain

O’Hara, J.
(concurring in result). Judge Brennan and I limit our decisional concurrence to the *566holding that there was testimony adduced by the people from which a jury could reasonably infer the guilt of defendant of both offenses charged beyond any reasonable doubt. We write separately only because we do not want to leave the impression that we agree with the majority opinion in Otis Adams.
As to the procedural errors raised, we find them without substance. We depend on both the statute1 and the court rule,2 which are included as footnotes.
Certainly we perceive no suggestion of a miscarriage of justice.
We vote to affirm.
V. J. Brennan, J., concurred.

 MCLA 769.26; MSA 28.1096.

 GCR 1963, 529.1.