Court Opinion

ID: 6905297
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 21:59:21.343188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:19.368342
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Harris
delivered the opinion of the court.
1. The appellant used and dealt with the land as though it then intended fully to accept and accede to the terms of the decree, and it will not be permitted to change the position which it voluntarily assumed. Kellogg v. Smith, 70 Or. 449, 456 (142 Pac. 330), furnishes a conclusive precedent. See, also, Thomas v. Booth-Kelly Co., 52 Or. 534 (97 Pac. 1078, 132 Am. St. Rep. 713); Elwert v. Marley, 53 Or. 591 (99 Pac. 887, 101 Pac. 671, 133 Am. St. Rep. 850); 3 C. J. 665, 669.
The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal Dismissed. Rehearing Denied.
Mr. Chief Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Bean concur.