Court Opinion

ID: 3002243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-24 20:26:37.393466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:51.446277
License: Public Domain

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
                                To be cited only in accordance with
                                        Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

                     United States Court of Appeals
                                     For the Seventh Circuit
                                     Chicago, Illinois 60604
                                   Submitted August 25, 2008*
                                     Decided October 3, 2008

                                               Before

                                FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

                                JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

                                DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 07-2234
                                                                Appeal from the United
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                       States District Court for the
      Plaintiff-Appellee,                                       Western District of
                                                                Wisconsin.
                v.
                                                                No. 05-CR-39-C-01
JOHN A. RADERMACHER,
      Defendant-Appellant.                                      Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge.

                                               Order

        After a limited remand under United States v. Taylor, 522 F.3d 731 (7th Cir. 2008),
the district judge informed us that she would have imposed a lower sentence had she
known about the extent of her discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558
(2007).

       Given this conclusion, the prejudice component of plain-error review has been
established. The sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in light
of Kimbrough.

       *After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary.
See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).