Court Opinion

ID: 4839563
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-23 08:09:33.608903+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:34.417428
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
We affirm appellant’s sentence entered after an open plea to the court on charges of violation of community control, without prejudice to seek postconviction relief.
We note that it was-not necessary for the court to conduct a “danger hearing” pursuant to section 948.06(8)(d), Florida Statutes (2016) because appellant did not meet any of the statutory criteria that trigger the necessity for such a hearing. However, appellant’s counsel did not object to the court conducting a proceeding where she found that appellant was- “a violent offender of special- concern.” Any error was therefore unpreserved.
We do not consider whether we can address the error as fundamental because appellate counsel has not raised the issue. See Wheeler v. State, 87 So.3d 5, 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Sampson v. State, 903 So.2d 1055, 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (Altenbernd, J., concurring); Williams v. State, 845 So.2d 987, 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
Ciklin, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.