Court Opinion

ID: 9616422
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:46:42.350698+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:05.032461
License: Public Domain

McCLINTOCK, Justice
(specially concurring) .
I concur in the affirmance of the judgment of the court below on the basis that the action of the school board is shown to have amounted at least partially to a discharge in violation of First Amendment rights of the petitioner. However, notwithstanding the considerable importance of other questions considered in the majority opinion, I believe that consideration thereof was rendered unnecessary by our decision upon the big point in the case and would therefore say that my concurrence should not be taken as either acquiescence with or dissent from these other views. See my similar concurrence in Stuebgen v. State, Wyo., 548 P.2d 870 (1976).