Court Opinion

ID: 4230902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-12-21 01:00:36.214334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:58.651745
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10195      Document: 00514279555         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/20/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-10195
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        December 20, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KENNETH RICHARDSON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:15-CR-526-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kenneth
Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Richardson has not filed a response. Although
Richardson remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed
the term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10195     Document: 00514279555     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/20/2017

                                  No. 17-10195

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED
in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States
v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

                                        2