Court Opinion

ID: 8746513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 11:09:09.128114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:00:42.309385
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
While we do not agree with all the findings of fact in the opinion of Judge Brown in the court below (107 Fed. 149), we agree with him in the more essential facts in the case, and concur in his conclusion that the tug did not exercise due care under the particular circumstances in performing the towage service. Her master was informed that the mast of the tow was about 134 feet high. Assuming that he had a right to suppose that the bridge was 135 feet above the water at mean high tide, the margin of safety was too narrow in the condition of the tide at the time. He ought to have been aware, upon observation of the piers and slips, that it had receded but a little. In taking the chances when this was apparent or should have been, he disregarded reasonable prudence.
Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.