Court Opinion

ID: 3216337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-23 14:10:43.598949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:40.242013
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kramer, J.), entered February 9, 2015 in Schenectady County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
 

  Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. The contentions raised by petitioner, including those that are jurisdictional in nature, could be raised upon direct appeal of his conviction or in a CPL article 440 motion (see
  
   People ex rel. Williams v Cunningham,
  
  106 AD3d 1303, 1304 [2013];
  
   People ex rel. Backman v Walsh,
  
  101 AD3d 1316, 1316 [2012],
  
   lv denied
  
  20 NY3d 863 [2013]). As we find no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure, Supreme Court’s order denying petitioner’s application will not be disturbed (see
  
   People ex rel. Williams v Cunningham,
  
  106 AD3d at 1304).
 

  Lahtinen, J.R, Egan Jr., Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.
 

  Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.