Court Opinion

ID: 1003459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:26:36.202842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:18.836825
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TONY B. ALEXANDER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-178-V, CA-98-106-3-V)

Submitted:   January 18, 2001             Decided:   January 24, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tony B. Alexander seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Alexander, Nos. CR-95-178-V;

CA-98-106-3-V (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 9, 2000; entered Aug. 10, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2