Court Opinion

ID: 6029438
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:41:36.87915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:10.933944
License: Public Domain

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated July 21, 1997, which, inter alia, denied her an award of maintenance.
Ordered that the judgment is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiff an award of maintenance and substituting therefor a provision directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $100 per week as maintenance for a period of four years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the plaintiff.
In determining a party’s maintenance or child support obligation, a court need not rely upon the party’s own account of his or her finances, but may impute income based upon the party’s past income or demonstrated earning potential (see, Brown v Brown, 239 AD2d 535). Here, the Supreme Court should have imputed additional income to the defendant in determining whether to award the plaintiff maintenance based upon his past demonstrated earning capacity. Therefore, we modify the judgment accordingly.
The wife’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.