Court Opinion

ID: 8409698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-02 17:07:00.456451+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:47:42.530186
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
ORDER
I.
Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, Judges Widener, Niemeyer, and Shedd voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins, Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, Michael, Motz, Trader, King, Gregory, and Duncan voted to deny rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
II.
The panel considered the petition for rehearing. Judge Niemeyer voted to grant the petition for rehearing, and Judges Michael and Motz voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied.
III.
Judge Wilkinson, Judge Luttig, and Judge Michael filed separate opinions concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Niemeyer filed a separate opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judge Widener joined. The separate opinions are attached.
IV.
Judge Williams, being disqualified, did not participate in the proceedings with respect to this case.