Court Opinion

ID: 5895698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 03:04:01.411993+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:29.618906
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the City of Yonkers from awarding to the respondent Ottawa Truck Corporation a contract for the supply of refuse removal vehicles, and to compel the City of Yonkers to award this contract to the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered June 6, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding without a hearing.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing and new determination.
The Supreme Court, Westchester County, improperly dismissed this proceeding without first conducting a hearing. The affidavits submitted raised various triable and disputed factual issues which require a hearing in order to be resolved (CPLR 7804 [h]; see also, Matter of Murphy v Burkhart, 92 AD2d 733; Matter of Masder Bldrs. v Overton, 15 AD2d 551). We point primarily to the question of whether the respondent Ottawa Truck Corporation submitted a bid proposal which failed to comply with the bid specification that the cab and chassis in the garbage trucks which were the subject of the contract "shall be of a proven design presently in production and service” and of whether the respondent municipality improp*577erly waived noncompliance with that specification. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.