Court Opinion

ID: 8167932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 21:04:52.756057+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:41.729768
License: Public Domain

HENRIOD, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint. Affirmed. Costs to defendants.
Powell owed Jones $445 for hauling his “cat.” The evidence fairly shows that in payment therefor Powell authorized Jones to rent the equipment, which Jones did, to defendant Brady, who paid Jones for the time he claimed it was used.
On conflicting evidence the hourage radically ranged from 1) actual and 2) meter-reading use calculation. The trial court chose to believe the actual-use evidence. It also rejected a second claim of negligent damage in employing the machine. On both counts the record reflects that he was supported by competent, substantial evidence.
Powell claims error in that the trial court did not enter findings and conclusions. No one asked for them.
 Generally where a case is tried to the court on facts adduced after issues joined, findings should be made and entered, but sans insistence thereon by the parties, we do not consider such error raisable for the first time on appeal, either under the rules or under elementary principles that would allow an adversary to meet the matter at the trial level.
McDonough, callister, crock-ETT, and WADE, JJ., concur.