Court Opinion

ID: 2897581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:59:38.742892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:52.802878
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0102-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MARCH 19, 2008
______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF K.F.
_________________________________

FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY

SITTING AS A JUVENILE COURT

NO. 2007-762,542; HONORABLE CECIL PURYEAR, JUDGE
_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
          K. F., a juvenile, appeals a final order rendered under the Juvenile Justice Code. 
Title III, Tex. Family Code Ann. (Vernon 2002 & Supp. 2007).  On February 15, 2008, the
trial court held a disposition hearing and placed K. F. on probation according to Family
Code § 54.04.  Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.04(d)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2007).  K. F. timely filed
a motion for new trial and notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b (a), Tex. R. App. P.
26.1.  Documentation provided us by the clerk of the trial court indicates that on February
26, 2008, the trial court granted K. F.’s motion for new trial.  
          By letter, we notified the parties that it appeared we lacked jurisdiction of the appeal
because of the trial court’s grant of a new trial.  We afforded K. F. and the State ten days
to demonstrate grounds for retaining the appeal.  Having received no response from either
side, we sua sponte consider our jurisdiction over the appeal.  See Buffalo Royalty Corp.
v. Enron Corp., 906 S.W.2d 275, 277 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1995, no writ) (noting our
obligation to consider jurisdiction sua sponte). 
          An order granting a new trial reinstates the case on the trial court’s docket “the same
as though no trial had been had.”  Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559,
563 (Tex. 2005); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.–Houston
[14th Dist.] 2003, pet. den’d) (“When a motion for new trial is granted, the original judgment
is set aside and the parties may proceed without prejudice from previous proceedings.”),
cert. denied, 543 U.S. 820, 125 S. Ct. 69, 160 L. Ed. 2d 29 (2004).  An order granting new
trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over the appeal.  Boris v. Boris, 642 S.W.2d
855, 856 (Tex.App.–Fort Worth 1982, no writ).  
          Accordingly, because there is no final order or judgment in this case, and having
given the parties the required ten days notice, we dismiss the appeal on our own motion
for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). 

                                                                                    James T. Campbell
                                                                                    Justice