Court Opinion

ID: 588478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:30.335850
License: Public Domain

972 F.2d 345
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Matthew Andrew WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bishop L. ROBINSON, Office of the Secretary, Department ofPublic Safety and Correctional Services,Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6409.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 20, 1992Decided:  August 4, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  William M. Nickerson, District Judge.  (CA-92-358-WN)
Matthew Andrew Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Matthew Andrew Wilson appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint for failure to particularize the claims.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Wilson v. Robinson, No. CA-92-358-WN (D. Md. Mar. 10, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED