Court Opinion

ID: 2964642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:28:47.18809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:07.708135
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            United States Court of Appeals
                                For the First Circuit
                                 ____________________

          No. 96-2361

                                   JERRY SANDSTROM,

                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Defendant - Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. Nancy J. Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________

                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________

                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge. 
                                         _____________

                                _____________________

               Elizabeth McDonough Noonan,  with whom Peter  Lawson Kennedy
               __________________________             _____________________
          and  Adler  Pollock  & Sheehan  Incorporated  were  on brief  for
               _______________________________________
          appellant.
               Mary  Elizabeth Carmody,  Assistant United  States Attorney,
               _______________________
          Senior  Litigation Counsel,  with  whom Donald  K. Stern,  United
                                                  ________________
          States Attorney, was on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                    April 24, 1997
                                 ____________________

                    Per Curiam.  Upon  consideration of the record, briefs,
                    Per Curiam.
                    __________

          and argument  of counsel, the  district court's judgment  and its

          denial of appellant's motion for a new trial are affirmed.
                                                           affirmed
                                                           ________

                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellee.
                    Costs on appeal are awarded to appellee.
                    _______________________________________

                                         -2-