Court Opinion

ID: 2920401
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 01:22:40.031965+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:42.625477
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-01-762-CV
 
                             COURT OF APPEALS
 
                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                                CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
 
CRISELDA
GARCIA,                                                              Appellant,
 
                                                   v.
 
H. E.
BUTT GROCERY COMPANY, ET AL.,                              Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
 
                        On appeal from the 370th District Court
                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
 
                                   O P I N I O N
 
                   Before Justices
Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
                                       Opinion Per Curiam
 

Appellant, CRISELDA
GARCIA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the   370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2373-98-G.  The clerk=s record was filed on February 26,
2002.  No reporter=s record was
filed.  Appellant=s brief was due on March 28, 2002. To date, no appellate brief has been received.
When the appellant has
failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure
and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant=s failure to timely
file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
On April 10, 2002,
notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal
pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  Appellant was
given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to
file a brief.  To date, no response has
been received.
The Court, having
examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to file a
proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and
appellant=s failure to respond,
is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
prosecution.  The appeal is hereby
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed
this the 20th
day of June, 2002