Court Opinion

ID: 9459770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:31:40.809112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:20.205165
License: Public Domain

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
Of the 49 various parties and inter-venors who entered formal appearances in this case, only two — Mobil and Amoco *914—have petitioned the Court for rehearing.
Both of these parties contest our statement that “no party 20 directly challenges this [new gas] rate as being too low.” [at p. 900]. On reconsideration, we believe that the statement might be somewhat misleading. Accordingly, it shall be deleted from the opinion and the following sentence shall be inserted in its place: “Of all the various parties 20 and interests represented in this case, only Mobil and Amoco suggest that this rate is too low.”
In all other respects, it is ordered that the petitions for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same are hereby denied.