Court Opinion

ID: 2319626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:05:32.840114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:40:22.328493
License: Public Domain

232 Md. 666 (1963)
194 A.2d 793
TYNER
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
[App. No. 19, September Term, 1963.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided November 13, 1963.
*667 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, petitioner complained below that he was convicted of burglary, although the evidence at the trial did not show that anything was taken. Petitioner was indicted for breaking and entering a storehouse with felonious intent, probably under Code (1962 Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 32. Such intent may be shown circumstantially, although articles of small or no value are taken. See Rahe v. State, 222 Md. 508 and McNeil v. State, 227 Md. 298. Moreover, the sufficiency of the evidence to support an indictment is not reviewable except on direct appeal. The sentence of three years is well within the statutory limits.
Application denied.