Court Opinion

ID: 1006804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:16:23.618915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:39.426962
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-7767

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

IRA STANFORD MULLINS, JR.,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CR-99-10052, CA-01-251)

Submitted:   February 14, 2002          Decided:    February 26, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ira Stanford Mullins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ira Stanford Mullins, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Mullins, Nos. CR-99-10052;

CA-01-251 (W.D. Va. July 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2