Court Opinion

ID: 5108017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 07:29:33.225745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:20.905878
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Phillip Ward, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his guilty pleas were not voluntarily and intelligently made because his counsel misinformed him regarding the sentence he would receive.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties *234have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).