Court Opinion

ID: 988474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:52:51.614092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:33.606491
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7858

ROLAND MACEO DEANE, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LARRY HUFFMAN; DAVID K. SMITH; JOHN DOE, #1;
T. BERT,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-94-497-R)

Submitted:   January 18, 1996             Decided:   February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roland Maceo Deane, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.       Mark Ralph Davis,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Deane v. Huffman, No. CA-94-497-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 3, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2