Court Opinion

ID: 990236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:18:11.645244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:35.241762
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REGINALD DONALD CAMPBELL,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-138, CA-96-61-3-P)

Submitted:   August 15, 1996              Decided:   August 20, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Donald Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

habeas motion, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Campbell, Nos.

CR-93-138; CA-96-61-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 1996). We further deny

Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2