Court Opinion

ID: 221528
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-07-21 22:31:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:50.663940
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUL 21 2011

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS RIVERA-TORRES,                              No. 08-72073

               Petitioner,                       Agency No. A077-983-677

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

               Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted July 12, 2011 **

Before:        SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

       Luis Rivera-Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056

(9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

      Rivera-Torres does not challenge the agency’s dispositive finding that his

asylum application is time-barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256,

1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s

opening brief are waived).

      The record does not compel the conclusion that the childhood sexual

molestation Rivera-Torres suffered or the harm he fears was or will be on account

of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992) (to

reverse the agency’s finding, “we must find that the evidence not only supports

that conclusion, but compels it”) (emphasis in original); Parussimova v. Mukasey,

555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected

ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”).

Accordingly, Rivera-Torres’s withholding of removal claim fails.

      Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review Rivera-Torres’s contention that there

is a pattern of violence against children in Mexico because he did not raise this

claim to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (no

jurisdiction over claims not presented below).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

                                          2                                     08-72073