Court Opinion

ID: 2988972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 02:38:02.037765+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:27.899940
License: Public Domain

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2012.

                                       In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                                NO. 14-12-00517-CV

               ROY MATA AND GILBERT E. GARCIA, Appellant
                                         V.
 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO
        BANK SOUTHWEST, NA F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB
                    F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK, Appellee

                    On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1
                              Harris County, Texas
                         Trial Court Cause No. 1008365

                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This is an appeal from the denial of a request filed by appellants, Roy Mata and
Gilbert E. Garcia, to proceed on appeal without the advance payment of costs. On April
12, 2012, the trial court signed a summary judgment in favor of appellee. On April 26,
2012, appellants filed a notice of appeal from the judgment and motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. On May 8, 2012, the trial court signed an order
sustaining the Harris County Clerk’s contest to appellants’ claim of indigence. On May
29, 2012, appellants filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 8, 2012 order.

       Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 governs the procedure to establish
indigence on appeal. Rule 20.1 was amended effective March 1, 2012. See Misc. Docket
No. 11-9251 (Tex. Dec. 12, 3011), 75 Tex. B.J. 59; Misc. Docket No. 12-9030, (Tex.
Feb. 13, 2012), 75 Tex. B.J. 228. The amended rule requires a party claiming indigence
who seeks review of the trial court’s order sustaining a contest to file his challenge
“within 10 days after the order sustaining the contest is signed, or within 10 days after the
notice of appeal is filed, whichever is later.” Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(2). Therefore,
appellants were required to file a motion challenging the order on or before May 18,
2012. Appellants’ notice of appeal filed May 29, 2012 is therefore untimely. See id.

       Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal from the order sustaining the contest to
appellants’ affidavits of indigence. Appellants’ appeal from the summary judgment
signed April 12, 2012, which is docketed under our case number 14-12-00400-CV,
remains pending before this court.

                                      PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.

                                             2