Court Opinion

ID: 992373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:51:02.46777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:20.519792
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6365

JAMES VERNON TUCKER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE;
CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the
State of South Carolina,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-
96-1707-0-18BD)

Submitted:   May 29, 1997                  Decided:   June 10, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Vernon Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Tucker v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-1707-0-18BD (D.S.C.
Feb. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2