Court Opinion

ID: 5392814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 09:58:29.323602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:19.441483
License: Public Domain

Under all the circumstances it would be preferable to have the matter considered de novo and in its entirety by a new board of arbitration. Order entered March 7, 1952, unanimously vacated. Order entered April 18, 1952, unanimously modified accordingly and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. The appeal from the order entered May 12, 1952, denying the motion to resettle, unanimously dismissed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.