Court Opinion

ID: 7449676
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:15:40.506168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:41.715967
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We have examined the briefs and record filed in this appeal. We conclude that the requirements of Ch. 932.38, F.S.1969, now Ch. 925.07, F.S.1970, F.S.A. and of Snell v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 581, were complied with, in that actual timely notice was received by defendant’s grandmother-guardian. We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.