Court Opinion

ID: 6142690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:43:10.222647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:42.867567
License: Public Domain

By the Court. Ingraham, First J.
The default in this case was taken in the court room after eleven o’clock of *126the day on which the summons was returnable. The defendant’s attorney appears to have absented himself from the court until after that hour, when the summons was returnable at ten.
"We do not think that going to attend to other business is necessarily a good excuse for setting aside a judgment. An application should at least be made to the court below for an opportunity to attend to other business, if necessary, before leaving the court.
But under the 366th section, the court has no power to set aside a judgment recovered in the court below, even if a good excuse is shown for the defendant, unless the party applying for a new trial shows that injustice has been done by the inquest, and not only that, but manifest injustice. (See Gottsberger v. Harned, post, p. 128.) Here the defendant shows no such thing. He merely rests upon an affidavit of merits, and discloses no defence whatever. This is clearly not within the provisions of the statute, and judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.