Court Opinion

ID: 9830256
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:02:05.940333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:16.933935
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[5] This motion for rehearing has convinced us that appellant’s sixth assignment of error, challenging the correctness of paragraph 8 of the trial court’s charge, should have been considered; that has accordingly been carefully done upon rehearing, but the conclusion is reached that it points out no error. The objection made to that paragraph of the charge was that it assumed as an established fact that the roadbed and bridge of the railway company had been negligently and unskillfully constructed. A close examination of the charge, however, convinces us that it was not reasonably subject to such criticism, and the assignment is overruled.
Unconvinced of error in other respects in our original disposition of the case, the motion for rehearing has been overruled.
Overruled.