Court Opinion

ID: 3174090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-05 08:30:27.587539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:07.201909
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

         RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
               Plaintiff-Appellee

                           v.

                   CAMTEK, LTD.,
                 Defendant-Appellant
                ______________________

                      2015-1434
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota in No. 0:05-cv-01396-JRT-FLN,
Judge John R. Tunheim.
                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Min-
neapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also repre-
sented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, MICHAEL A. ERBELE.

    DANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Ur-
quhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for
defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M.
STERN; DAVID LEON BILSKER, San Francisco, CA.
                ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Cir-
cuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 February 3, 2016                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                  Clerk of Court