Court Opinion

ID: 2690210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:39:40.530411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:52:55.202852
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Cochran, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166, 2014-Ohio-100.]

             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. COCHRAN, APPELLANT.
         [Cite as State v. Cochran, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166, 2014-Ohio-100.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Washington.
     (No. 2013-0464—Submitted May 21, 2013—Decided January 23, 2014.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 11AP-408,
                                    2012-Ohio-5899.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} Appellant’s request that this cause be held for the decision in case
No. 2013-1255, State v. Rogers, is denied. Appellee’s motion for summary
affirmance is granted, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the
authority of State v. Washington, 137 Ohio St. 3d 427, 2013-Ohio-4982, 999
N.E.2d 661.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur.
                                ____________________
        Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Barbara A.
Farnbacher, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Kura, Wilford & Schregardus Co., L.P.A., and Sarah M. Schregardus, for
appellant.
                             ________________________