Court Opinion

ID: 5969838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:32:07.691676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:27.864064
License: Public Domain

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court erred in awarding plaintiff maintenance arrears from June 1986 in the amount of $6,250. In support of his contention that plaintiff agreed to accept reduced payments during that period, defendant submitted a letter dated April 23, 1986, from plaintiff to defendant’s former attorney, stating that she agreed to "[defendant’s] request” to reduce his monthly support payments. He also asserted that plaintiff accepted 28 reduced payments. Plaintiff testified that she "pleaded with him” by telephone and in letters to pay more but she failed to specify the dates of those telephone calls and letters. A letter from her attorney to defendant dated August 18, 1987, demanding compliance with the separation agreement is the earliest proof that plaintiff intended to enforce the terms of the agreement. Plaintiff is entitled to arrears from the date of that letter (see, Matter of Robinson v Robinson, 81 AD2d 1028; see also, Albert v Albert, 144 AD2d 1016; Shickler v Shickler, 97 AD2d 461). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Doyle, J.—Support.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Davis and Boehm, JJ.