Court Opinion

ID: 9960907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-17 16:03:39.512422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:05.602733
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                             State of Florida

                      Opinion filed April 17, 2024.

                          ________________

                             No. 3D24-344
                    Lower Tribunal No. 24-30525 CC
                          ________________

                          Roberto Somoza,
                               Appellant,

                                   vs.

                     Ramon Lavado Martinez,
                               Appellee.

     An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for Miami-
Dade County, Lissette De La Rosa, Judge.

     Wolfe Law Miami, P.A., and Richard C. Wolfe, for appellant.

     Legal Armor the People’s Law Firm, and Alian M. Perez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

     GORDO, J.

                    ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
      Roberto Somoza (“Somoza”) appeals an order granting Ramon

Lavado Martinez’s (“Martinez”) verified emergency motion for temporary

injunction. Based on Martinez’s commendable and appropriate confession

of error, we reverse the defective order under review, which lacks the

requisite findings to justify entry of a temporary injunction, and remand for

further proceedings. See Allied Universal Corp. v. Given, 223 So. 3d 1040,

1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“To grant a temporary injunction, the moving

party must plead and establish: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the

unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of

success on the merits; (3) that the threatened injury to the petitioner

outweighs any possible harm to the respondent; and (4) that the granting of

a temporary injunction will not disserve the public interest.”); Angelino v.

Santa Barbara Enters., LLC, 2 So. 3d 1100, 1103 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“The

entry of a temporary injunction, however, will not stand unless the trial

courts makes specific findings in support of each and every element

required for the entry of the injunction. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure

1.610 sets forth the form and scope requirements for the entry of a

temporary injunction. Every temporary injunction must specify the reasons

for its entry, and it must describe in reasonable detail the act or acts to be

restrained.”).

                                      2
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

                             3