Court Opinion

ID: 717205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 07:09:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:44.073733
License: Public Domain

82 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.In re EPI PRODUCTS USA, INC., Debtor.O'BRIEN INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant,v.James A. DUMAS, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.
No. 95-55141.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 26, 1996.*Decided April 1, 1996.

Before:  GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
In light of this court's recent opinions in Mosier v. Kroger Company (In re IRFM, Inc.), 65 F.3d 778 (9th Cir.1995), pet. for cert. filed, 64 U.S.L.W. 3604 (Feb. 26, 1996), and John Mitchell, Inc. v. Steinbrugge (In re Hanna), 72 F.3d 114 (9th Cir.1995), we reverse and remand for further proceedings before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4.   Appellee's motion to strike appellant's reply brief is denied

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3