Court Opinion

ID: 2963780
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:15:07.090904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:43.582516
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

        November 21, 1995       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                           

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1087 

                                    UNITED STATES,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                                 CESAR RAMON ROBLES,

                                Defendant, Appellant.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Joel D. Landry on brief for appellant.
            ______________
            Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney,  and Zechariah Chafee,
            __________________                               ________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per  Curiam.   In this  appeal, Cesar  Roman Robles
                      ___________

            challenges  the  district court's  denial  of  his motion  to

            dismiss his  indictment for having  illegally reentered  this

            country after having been deported.  See 8 U.S.C.   1326.  We
                                                 ___

            affirm  essentially for  the  reasons given  in the  district

            court's  order, finding  Robles'  appellate  arguments to  be

            without merit.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
                            ___

                      Affirmed.
                      _________

                                         -2-