Court Opinion

ID: 8436543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:34:36.853159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.542191
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook, No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF, 2010 WL 1444190 (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). *808We deny Sweat’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.