Court Opinion

ID: 9758119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 23:12:20.34187+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:47.187281
License: Public Domain

PARRISH, Presiding Judge,
concurring.
I concur. I write separately only to comment on the reliance by the trial court on affidavits of the petitioner, Mike D. Jarrell, in determining whether Mr. Jarrell refused to submit to a chemical test of his breath pursuant to requirements of § 577.020.1, RSMo Cum.Supp.1999.
The Director of Revenue conceded that the affidavits of Mr. Jarrell were evidence in this case. Persons who read the principal opinion in this case should not infer that a party’s affidavit concerning issues to be determined by a trial would be admissible evidence in the face of a proper objection.