Court Opinion

ID: 5766523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:24:07.90948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:39.928551
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ruiz, J.), dated April 4, 2008, which denied his motion to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated January 2, 2008, as, after a fact-finding inquest held upon his default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, determined that he had abandoned *745the subject child, terminated his parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to Mercy First and the Commissioner of Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“The determination whether to relieve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court” (Matter of Francisco R., 19 AD3d 502, 502 [2005] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Tenisha Tishonda T., 302 AD2d 534 [2003]). To vacate the order, the father was required to show that there was a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense (see Matter of Francisco R., 19 AD3d at 502). The father did not make the requisite showing (id.). Prudenti, EJ., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.