Court Opinion

ID: 9645133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:13:36.827273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:23.642491
License: Public Domain

SHERTZ, Judge,
dissenting:
This case illustrates, rather clearly, the validity of the observation by Mr. Justice Pomeroy, that the line between the requisite degree of persuasion and impermissible specu*75lation is, admittedly, sometimes difficult to draw. Commonwealth v. Cimaszewski, 447 Pa. 141, 143-44, 288 A.2d 805, 806 (1972). I am satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to prove that appellant committed the burglary. Commonwealth v. Eddington, 255 Pa.Super. 25, 386 A.2d 117 (1978); In the Interest of Hector Gonzalez, 255 Pa.Super. 217, 386 A.2d 586 (1978). Accordingly, I would affirm the adjudication of delinquency.