Court Opinion

ID: 4442386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-27 19:00:18.923865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:00.943564
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 19-6608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff - Appellee,

              v.

LEE GUY,

                     Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:12-cr-00134-BO-1)

Submitted: September 24, 2019                               Decided: September 27, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Guy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Lee Guy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for return of

property, Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Guy, No. 7:12-cr-00134-BO-1 (E.D.N.C., Feb. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2