Court Opinion

ID: 4415240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-10 15:03:15.606726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:45:29.370772
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                         No. 1D18-2472
                 _____________________________

MICHAEL ALLEN CLARK,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Brantley S. Clark, Judge.

                          July 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

     In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the
resulting judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the
written revocation order does not conform to the trial court’s oral
pronouncement in that it indicates Appellant violated conditions
three and five of his probation, when the court found only a
violation of condition three. On remand, the court should enter a
corrected order accurately specifying the basis for the revocation.
See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

    AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

RAY, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
                _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public
Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

                               2