Court Opinion

ID: 7524173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:59:15.101503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:36.461597
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant was charged by information with burglary and grand theft. He was found guilty by a jury of trespass, as a lesser included offense of burglary. As to the grand theft count, he was found not guilty. He was adjudicated guilty of trespass and sentenced to a one year term of imprisonment.
Reversal is sought on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel’s objection to a police technician’s testimony that the appellant’s fingerprints were obtained from him at the jail. Appellant argues that such statement to the jury deprived him of a fair and impartial trial.
We find no merit in this contention, and affirm. Parrish v. State, 366 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.
Affirmed.