Court Opinion

ID: 1004860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:47:50.352957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:15.757536
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6809

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID J. PINGLEY,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-39)

Submitted:   July 12, 2001                  Decided:   July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Pingley, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David J. Pingley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pingley, No.

CR-94-39 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2