Court Opinion

ID: 6840055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:15:09.08496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:04:49.303261
License: Public Domain

THOMPSON, District Judge.
The petitioner arrived in the United States on October 13, 1913, declared his intention in this court on June 19, 1926, and filed his petition for naturalization on February 13,1929. He left the United States to visit his native country, Italy, on December 13, 1927, having secured a re-entry permit from the immigration authorities good for one year. The purpose of the return to Italy was to visit his parents. While there, he married and worked on a farm a considerable part of the time. He returned to the United States on December 7, 1928. It therefore appears that he was absent from the United States for nearly ten months during the period of one year required as residence in Pennsylvania and was not present in this country when the one-year period began to run.
If the applicant had left Pennsylvania for New York or any other state of the Union at the time he left for Italy under the same circumstances and had returned to Pennsylvania on December 7,1928,1 would have held that he had not established a continuous residence in Pennsylvania for the year immediately preceding the date of filing his application. A somewhat proportionate absence from the United States and from the state of Pennsylvania was held sufficient to cancel a certificate of naturalization in United States v. Bragg (D. C.) 257 F. 588, and upon the principles governing the required residence in the United States and in the state where the application was filed upon which the conclusions in that case were reached, it is held that the facts here do not establish the required residence in Pennsylvania.
Petition denied, without prejudice.