Court Opinion

ID: 7775194
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:00:59.856471+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:48.724460
License: Public Domain

As I have previously written, see R.S.C. v. J.B.C.,812 So.2d 361, 373 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001) (Crawley, J., concurring in the result), I am of the opinion that § 30-3-4.1, Ala. Code 1975, "is per se, or facially, unconstitutional." Accordingly, I do not share the opinion that the ore tenus evidence that was presented to the trial court may have been sufficient to grant the paternal grandmother visitation rights. For that reason, I respectfully dissent.