Court Opinion

ID: 627579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:01:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:40.776659
License: Public Domain

1 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Davey James REEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lance HALE;  Terry Grimes, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6444.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 16, 1993.Decided:  August 4, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-279-R)
Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Davey James Reedy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Reedy v. Hale, No. CA-93-279-R (W.D. Va.  Apr. 13, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Reedy's motion for summary judgment