Court Opinion

ID: 9598336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:08:01.856314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:01.593287
License: Public Domain

Felton, Chief Judge,
concurring specially. Construing the amendment to the petition most strongly against the plaintiff on demurrer-, I am- very doubtful whether the - amendment should be construed as the'majority has construed it.- The amendment alleges that the sample, “when tested was satisfactory to plaintiff as' to percentage of purity and germination, under the terms of the contract.”- If .the seed met the - requirements stated, in the contract it would not make any difference - whether the sample was satisfactory to the plaintiff or not.-- Since the majority ruling accomplishes the same purpose as would a ruling to the effect that a'waiver of the requirement -specified in. the contract would not cure the defect in the petition that it was not alleged that the seed met- the requirements of' the contract, and .since the plaintiff will have to prove as a prerequisite to recovery in this case that the seed met the requirements stated -in the contract, I concur in the construction- placed by the majority on the amendment to the petition. ■. .......