Court Opinion

ID: 46621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:02:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:40.552018
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 25, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-50008
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO LARICO SMITH,
                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 6:05-CR-30-2
                        --------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Larico Smith has

requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Smith has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Our independent review of the brief, Smith’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.     Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-50008
     -2-