Court Opinion

ID: 8637493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:47:41.239953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:58.596512
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ketevan Javakhishvili, a native of the former Soviet Union and citizen of Georgia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an IJ’s credibility findings. Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). We deny in part, and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s credibility finding because there are inconsistencies between Javakhishvili’s testimony and her asylum application regarding the nature of her alleged injuries and the duration of her detention, and these inconsistencies go to the heart of her claim. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938, 940 (9th Cir.2000).
Without credible testimony we uphold the agency’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. See Farah, 348 F.3d at 1156.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Javak-hishvili’s contentions regarding CAT protection, because she did not raise them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.