Court Opinion

ID: 695842
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:28:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:00.078310
License: Public Domain

54 F.3d 773NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Quinten L. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lieutenant KING;  Correctional Officer Thomas;  CorrectionalOfficer Ward;  Correctional Officer Brady;Richard A. Lanham, Sr.;  Kenneth Taylor;Ralph Logan;  R. Wilson,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7376.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.Decided May 18, 1995.

Quinten L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Jackson v. King, No. CA-94-719-WN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED