Court Opinion

ID: 8850639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 17:12:06.811719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:29.061818
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
(.Tune 14, 1891.)
PER CURIAD!.
The court, has duly considered the petition for a rehearing filed in this cause by the appellees under rule 29, 47 Fed. xiii. The causes assigned in the petition, numbered 1 to 5, inclusive, were not. brought to the attention of the court at the argument, or by appellees’ brief. To permit them to be argued now would split up the case in a manner which the proper progress of suits does not ordinarily allow of. Extreme cases may arise where this may be done, but this is not one of them, though it might he if this procedure was under the criminal provisions of the statutes, or if the joinder of defendants involved, as a practical result, a gross injustice. The remaining causes were fully considered by the court before its conclusion was announced.
Ordered that, as none of the judges who concurred in the judgment in this case desire that the petition for a rehearing be granted or argued, the petition is denied, and the mandate may issue forthwith.