Court Opinion

ID: 3866080
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:59:54.188422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:32.981282
License: Public Domain

It is the settled practice in chancery for the court not to proceed with a bill for partition, when the plaintiff's title is disputed and in doubt, until he has *Page 528 
established his right in an action at law. 4 Kent's Comm. 364, and cases cited in notes; Freeman on Coparcenary  Partition, § 502. Under this rule the bill must stand over to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to recover in ejectment. There is a difficulty suggested in the case at bar. The estate is in the hands of a receiver appointed by the court in another suit. We think, however, the difficulty is not insuperable. We can give the plaintiffs leave to bring and prosecute their action of ejectment against the defendant, notwithstanding the receivership, confining the defence to the question of title, — the execution, if the plaintiffs recover, not to issue until permitted by this court. An order may be entered to that effect.
Decree accordingly.