Court Opinion

ID: 9369903
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-10 01:00:31.749407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:18.032278
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50171         Document: 00516640835             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/09/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50171
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 9, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Stephen Bernard Escalada,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:21-CR-305-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          Counsel appointed to represent Stephen Bernard Escalada on appeal
   has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967). Escalada has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50171   Document: 00516640835         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/09/2023

                                No. 22-50171

   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                     2