Court Opinion

ID: 2717814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-13 19:04:33.554901+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:41:16.823003
License: Public Domain

STATE OF MINNESOTA

                                   IN SUPREME COURT

                                       A14-0090

Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals                                          Page, J.

Sharyn Hartwig,

                    Relator,

vs.                                                             Filed: August 13, 2014
                                                             Office of Appellate Courts
Traverse Care Center and Minnesota
Counties Intergovernmental Trust,

                    Respondents,

Continental Life Insurance, Midway Medical
Clinic/Steven P. Radjenovich, D. O.,
Heartland Orthopedic Specialists,

                    Intervenors.

                               ________________________

DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, Minnesota, for relator.

Timothy P. Jung, David M. Bateson, Peter D. Stiteler, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson,
P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Susan L. Naughton, League of Minnesota Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amici curiae
League of Minnesota Cities, Association of Minnesota Counties, Minnesota Association
of Townships, and Hennepin County.

Charlene K. Feenstra, Kalli M. Bennett, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff & Johnson,
P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance
Association.
                             ________________________

                                           1
                                     SYLLABUS

       The phrase “old age and survivor insurance benefits,” as used in Minn. Stat.

§ 176.101, subd. 4 (2012), refers to social security benefits under the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34 (2012).

       Reversed and remanded.

                                      OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

       Relator Sharyn Hartwig was a certified nursing assistant employed by respondent

Traverse Care Center (Traverse) when she sustained various work-related injuries

between September 4, 2005, and May 5, 2010. Hartwig has been permanently and totally

disabled since May 5, 2010, and has been receiving workers’ compensation benefits since

that date. Hartwig began receiving a retirement annuity from the Public Employees

Retirement Association (PERA) on August 1, 2012. See generally Minn. Stat. ch. 353

(2012). She has not applied for or received any disability benefits from PERA. At some

point, Hartwig began receiving federal social security retirement benefits. The statute

provides that once Traverse paid $25,000 in permanent total disability benefits, Traverse

was entitled, under Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4 (2012), to offset Hartwig’s permanent

total disability benefits by the amount of her social security retirement benefits. The

$25,000 offset trigger was reached on March 8, 2011.

       The parties disagreed, however, as to whether Traverse was entitled to apply the

subdivision 4 offset to Hartwig’s PERA retirement benefits. Hartwig therefore filed a

petition to challenge Traverse’s right to apply the subdivision 4 offset to her PERA

                                             2
retirement benefits. Without holding a hearing, the compensation judge granted Traverse

the offset. The compensation judge concluded that public employee retirement benefits

are within the meaning of “government disability benefits,” as that term is defined in

Minn. R. 5222.0100, subp. 4 (2013) (emphasis added).1

       The WCCA disagreed with the compensation judge’s interpretation of Minn. R.

5222.0100, subp. 4, but nonetheless affirmed. Hartwig v. Traverse Care Ctr. & Minn.

Cntys. Intergovernmental Trust, 2013 WL 7017758, at *2, *5 (Minn. WCCA Dec. 23,

2013). The WCCA concluded based, in part, on its past decisions allowing an offset for

public employee retirement benefits, that Hartwig’s PERA retirement annuity was an

“old age and survivor insurance benefit[ ].” Id. at *4-5 (citing Kramer v. City of St. Paul,

33 Minn. Workers’ Comp. Dec. 425 (WCCA 1981), Wicks v. City of S. St. Paul, 1988

WL 216735 (Minn. WCCA Nov. 18, 1988), and Adamski v. Kenneth Setterholm’s Farm,

58 Minn. Workers’ Comp. Dec. 119, 121 (WCCA 1998)).

       Before us, Hartwig argues, as did the employee in Ekdahl v. Independent School

District #213, __ N.W.2d __, A14-0089 (Minn. August 13, 2014), that Minn. Stat.

§ 176.101, subd. 4, does not permit permanent total disability benefits to be offset by

public employee pension benefits. In Ekdahl, we held that the term “old age and survivor

insurance benefits,” as used in Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4, refers only to federal social

1
       Minnesota Rule 5222.0100, subpart 4, provides: “ ‘Government disability
benefits’ means disability benefits paid by any government disability program within the
meaning of Minnesota Statutes, section 176.101, subdivision 4. It includes, but is not
limited to, social security disability benefits, old age and survivor benefits, fire relief
association benefits, police relief association benefits, and public employee’s retirement
benefits.” Minn. R. 5222.0100, subp. 4 (2013).

                                             3
security benefits received by an injured worker pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42

U.S.C. §§ 401-34 (2012), and not to government-service pension benefits. As a result,

we held that the offset in Minn. Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4, for “old age and survivor

insurance benefits” does not apply to an employee’s non-social security pension benefits.

Because Ekdahl controls our decision here, we reverse and remand to the WCCA for

further proceedings consistent with this opinion.2

       Reversed and remanded.

2
       Like Ekdahl, Hartwig raises an equal protection claim. For the same reasons we
did not address Ekdahl’s constitutional claim, we do not address Hartwig’s constitutional
claim.

                                             4