Court Opinion

ID: 2930048
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 00:16:23.856164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:09.037906
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 29, 2004

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 29, 2004.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-03-01262-CR
____________
 
CHAD MICHAEL IVEY,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 262nd District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
953,334
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of
aggravated robbery.  On November 4, 2003,
the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 35 years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed July 29, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler,
Edelman, and Seymore. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).