Court Opinion

ID: 8746459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 11:09:06.507353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:00:42.169897
License: Public Domain

TOWNSEND, District Judge
(orally). The articles in question are tennis balls, made of India-rubber and covered with wool; the India rubber being the component material of chief value. They were assessed for duty under the provisions of paragraphs 366 and 391 of the act of 1897 (30 Stat. 184, 187), as manufactures of which wool is a component material, at 44 cents per pound, and 55 per cent, ad valorem. The question herein has been disposed of in the appeal of these importers (Slazenger v. U. S. [C. C.] 91 Fed. 517), except in so far as it may be affected by the following proviso in paragraph 391 (30 Stat. 187) of the silk schedule: “Provided, that all manufactures, of which wool is a component material, shall be classified and assessed for duty as manufactures of wool.” Counsel lor the United States contends that congress intended this proviso to apply to any manufacture of which wool is a component material. Counsel for the importers contends that this proviso is limited to the manufactures of silk, in said paragraph 391 of the silk schedule. It is clear that the construction contended for by the importers is correct. It appears by references to various other provisos in said act that, if congress had intended that this proviso should apply to paragraphs other than that in which it is inserted, they would have inserted language indicating such intention.
The decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed.