Court Opinion

ID: 8475871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:39:51.595415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:25.556008
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chalmers Lavette Hendricks appeals a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Hendricks was not entitled to a reduction because even with the benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his Guidelines range of imprisonment remained the same. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.