Court Opinion

ID: 6245631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 20:58:07.92734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:16.866977
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,
This appeal from the judgment in ejectment entered against, the defendant on the case stated was submitted by counsel without oral argument.
On inspection of the record it appears in limine that we have no appellate jurisdiction of the case. It contains no such certificate of the trial judge as is prescribed and required by the amendatory act of May 5, 1899, which has been in force since the first of July last. Section 4 of that act, P. L. 249, provides as follows: “ In actions of ejectment, legal or equitable, .... the judge hearing.the case shall certify whether the value of the land, or of the interest, or of the property really in controversy is greater that $1,500, and his certificate shall be conclusive proof of such value for the purposes of this act.” In the concluding paragraph of the case stated both parties “ reserve the right of appeal and agree that the value of the premises in dispute exceeds the value of one thousand dollars ($1,000).” No such agreement as this can be regarded as the legal equivalent of the jurisdictional certificate prescribed and required by the terms of the act; but if it were otherwise, the agreement, of the parties as to the value of the premises in dispute would show that this Court has no jurisdiction of the case except to remit it for hearing and determination to the Superior Court, where according to their valuation of the premises it properly belongs.
It is therefore ordered that the above entitled case be remitted at appellant’s expense to the Superior Court for hearing and determination.