Court Opinion

ID: 8028195
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:53:38.006733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:53.066524
License: Public Domain

On August 25, 1993, the Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years for Felony Forgery with three (3) years suspended. Credit is given for time served plus conditions.
On November 19,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Tbrger Oaas, Attorney from Lewistown, Montana. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is' the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the *11reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
DATED this 19th day of November, 1993.
Hon. Thomas McKittrick, Chairman, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Member and Hon. Robert Boyd, Alternate Member.
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Tbrger Oaas, Attorney from Lewis-town, for his assistance to the defendant and to this Court.