Court Opinion

ID: 1839535
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:35:03.04554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:21:55.298944
License: Public Domain

37 Mich. App. 662 (1972)
195 N.W.2d 289
PEOPLE
v.
HOWARD
Docket No. 10637.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided January 19, 1972.
*663 Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, George E. Thick, II, Prosecuting Attorney, and Roy De Gesero, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Brisbois, Sturtz & LaDue, for defendant.
Before: R.B. BURNS, P.J., and FITZGERALD and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ.
V.J. BRENNAN, J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of first-degree murder (MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548). Prior to his trial, defendant's attorneys moved to have him committed in order that his competency to stand trial be determined as provided by GCR 1963, 786.3. The court originally ordered such a commitment, but subsequently amended its order to provide that defendant be examined by a local clinical psychologist, the purpose being to determine whether commitment to a diagnostic facility was necessary to determine defendant's competency.
We feel the judge's actions in this regard were erroneous and reversible. The court rule (GCR 1963, 786.3) is mandatory. Whenever there is any question as to a defendant's competency to stand trial, and that question is raised upon defendant's motion, the court "shall" order the defendant committed *664 to a diagnostic facility. People v Ledbetter, 31 Mich App 160 (1971).
Reversed and remanded for commitment to a diagnostic institution and for a new trial.
All concurred.