Court Opinion

ID: 1000506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:41:43.786938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:15.772011
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DERRICK ANTHONY JOHNSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief
District Judge. (CR-95-17)

Submitted:   December 16, 1999         Decided:     December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Derrick Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered

evidence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Johnson, No. CR-95-17 (W.D. Va. July 15, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2