Court Opinion

ID: 9407061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-05 19:09:16.646424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:35.115826
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                             NO.       2023     KW    0496

VERSUS

ROBERT       LEE    MARSHALL                                                                                    2023
                                                                                             JULY 51

In    Re:          Robert       Lee    Marshall,           applying          for       supervisory               writs,

                   22nd    Judicial          District           Court,       Parish          of     St.       Tammany,
                   No.    383667.

BEFORE:            LANIER,      HESTER,       AND       MILLER,       JJ.

        WRIT       DENIED       ON    THE    SHOWING          MADE.     Relator         failed           to     include
a     file -stamped          copy        of        the        application              for     postconviction

relief,          the     district       court'      s
                                                ruling,  the bill                             of    information,
the    commitment          order,       pertinent district court                         minutes,              and    any
other       portion       of    the     district          court       record           that        might        support

the    claims          raised    in    the    writ       application.          Therefore,                 this      court
cannot
        adequately                     review            the      ruling           at         issue             herein.
Supplementation of                   this     writ       application          and/ or          an    application

for     rehearing  will               not     be    considered.               See       Uniform            Rules        of

Louisiana     Courts of               Appeal,           Rules    2- 18. 7 &         4- 9.           In    the       event

relator          elects    to   file     a    new application               with this              court,        he may
do    so     without       the                           of                                               date.
                                      necessity                 obtaining          a    return                       Any
future       filing       on    this     issue          should    include          the        entire          contents

of    this       application,          the    missing           items       noted       above,           and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                         WIL
                                                         CHH
                                                         SMM

COURT       OF APPEAL,         FIRST    CIRCUIT

U16          PUTY      CLERK    OF    COURT
                  FOR    THE    COURT