Court Opinion

ID: 8483115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-10 20:50:26.727862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:44.062489
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                Nov 10, 2022
                                                                                02:28 PM(CT)
                                                                             TENNESSEE COURT OF
                                                                            WORKERS' COMPENSATION
                                                                                   CLAIMS

           TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
          IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                           AT NASHVILLE

 Mina Shalabi,                                  )   Docket No. 2021-06-1493
            Employee,                           )
 v.                                             )
 Amazon.com Services, LLC,                      )   State File No. 72776-2021
            Employer,                           )
 And                                            )
 American Zurich Ins. Co.,                      )   Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
            Carrier.                            )

                           EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

        Mina Shalabi requested temporary disability benefits and additional treatment for
injuries to his foot and ankle suffered while working for Amazon.com Services, LLC. The
Court held an expedited hearing on November 3, 2022. For the reasons below, the Court
concludes Mr. Shalabi is entitled to two days of past temporary disability benefits, but he
is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding additional treatment.

                                     Claim History

       A coworker pushing a cart hit Mr. Shalabi’s left heel on September 14, 2021.
Amazon offered no evidence to suggest that the incident did not happen as Mr. Shalabi
described. Instead, it initially accepted the claim and offered a panel of physicians. Mr.
Shalabi chose Dr. Harold Nevels, whom he saw three times.

       At the first two visits, Dr. Nevels assessed a heel contusion and recommended over-
the-counter medications, ice and modified duty. He declined to order x-rays for a “[s]imple
bruise of heel.” At the third and final visit on September 24, Dr. Nevels ordered x-rays,
which were “negative.” He found that Mr. Shalabi was “at functional goal, not at end of
healing,” placed him at maximum medical improvement, and released him to work full-
duty.

                                            1
        As to causation, at the second and third visits, Dr. Nevels noted he was “here today
for a recheck workers [sic] comp injury.” Mr. Shalabi testified, without objection, that Dr.
Nevels said the injury was work-related.

       Amazon then agreed to allow Mr. Shalabi to obtain a second opinion from
orthopedist Dr. Lucas Ritchie. On October 5, Dr. Ritchie examined the foot and read the
x-rays, which showed only chronic changes. He wrote:

       I cannot state with medical certainty that greater than 50% of his current
       symptoms are a direct result of an injury that has occurred while he was at
       work[.] . . . [H]e has global tenderness that cannot be fully attributed to a
       direct impact on his achilles. [T]here is no one true definable pathology and
       pain is out of proportion to what I would expect from a direct injury weeks
       ago. [W]ith a direct injury I would expect more focal pain at the impact site
       with some possible bruising[,] swelling or more specific examination
       findings.

(Emphasis added). Dr. Ritchie returned Mr. Shalabi to work with restrictions, “but
causation not established.” He referred Mr. Shalabi to a foot specialist but also wrote that
the workers’ compensation carrier was unlikely to cover it.

     A few days later, Amazon denied the claim because “MD indicated that this was a
non-work related injury.”

       Mr. Shalabi testified that his heel is still painful. He has seen his private physician,
who prescribed a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory. Mr. Shalabi did not introduce records
from the visit, however.

        As for Mr. Shalabi’s earnings while treating with Dr. Nevels, Amazon was unable
to accommodate his restrictions. Amazon offered a declaration from Ben Woods, its
workers’ compensation manager, to document the times Mr. Shalabi worked after the
injury.

        Mr. Woods’s declaration and attachments record that on September 15 and 16—the
first two days after his accident—Mr. Shalabi worked full shifts of approximately ten
hours. Mr. Shalabi was on an approved leave of absence from September 17-28, although
neither party introduced evidence of how much, if anything, he was compensated during
that time.

       Mr. Shalabi generally agreed with the declaration’s accuracy. He testified, without
objection, that he had been told not to return to work until September 28. He offered an
email from Amazon, which states, “I have processed your return to work to begin
09/28/21.”

                                              2
        Mr. Shalabi requested additional treatment with a foot specialist and past temporary
disability benefits, although he did not specify a requested amount or for which days he
believes he is owed compensation. Amazon countered that, after the second medical
opinion, it properly denied the claim, so it has provided all the benefits to which he is
entitled.

                            Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

        At an expedited hearing, Mr. Shalabi must show that he will likely prevail in proving
his entitlement to benefits at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1)
(2022); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS
6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

                                     Temporary Partial Disability

       Turning first to temporary disability benefits, “[w]here the treating physician has
released the injured worker to return to work with restrictions before reaching maximum
recovery, and the employer cannot return the employee to work within the restrictions, the
injured worker may be eligible for temporary partial disability.” Woodard v. Freeman
Expositions, LLC, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 21, at *8 (July 16, 2021).
Amazon did not dispute that Dr. Nevels placed restrictions, which it was unable to
accommodate.

      However, the Workers’ Compensation Law also states: “No compensation shall be
allowed for the first seven (7) days of disability resulting from the injury, excluding the
day of injury, except [medical benefits], but if disability extends beyond that period,
compensation shall commence with the eighth day after the injury.” Tenn. Code Ann. §
50-6-205(a).

        Here, Dr. Nevels placed restrictions on September 16 for Mr. Shalabi’s injury on
September 14, which day (September 14) is excluded from the computation. He worked a
full shift on September 15. So, benefits began on September 16, and the benefit period ran
until September 24, when Dr. Nevels assigned maximum medical improvement. This
period is nine days, including September 24. The statute says that no compensation is
owed for the first seven days. But, if the disability extends beyond the first seven days,
excluding the date of injury, compensation shall commence with the eighth day. Therefore,
Mr. Shalabi is owed benefits for days eight and nine. At his daily compensation rate of
$73.65, he is owed $147.30.1
1
 Amazon rigorously cross-examined Mr. Shalabi regarding his earnings during the relevant timeframe from
another employer. However, Amazon offered no specific proof on this issue and ultimately did not request
credit for these other earnings. It likewise did not seek credit for sums Mr. Shalabi received from the short-
term disability carrier, if any.
                                                      3
                                      Medical Benefits

       Next, the Court considers Mr. Shalabi’s entitlement to additional treatment. The
question is whether he satisfied his burden to show that his current condition qualifies as
an “injury” as defined in the Workers’ Compensation Law. Specifically, an “injury” must
arise “primarily out of employment,” meaning that it must be shown “to a reasonable
degree of medical certainty that the injury contributed more than fifty percent” in causing
the need for medical treatment, considering all causes. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
102(12)(C).

       Applying that definition, Mr. Shalabi correctly argued that Dr. Nevels believed his
injury was work-related. However, Dr. Ritchie, a specialist, later reached a contrary
conclusion, noting, “I cannot state with medical certainty that greater than 50% of his
current symptoms are a direct result of an injury that has occurred while he was at work[.]”
(Emphasis added). Dr. Ritchie found Mr. Shalabi’s condition three weeks after the incident
to be non-work-related, using terminology that closely mirrors the statute. Dr. Ritchie also
found chronic changes that he could not attribute to the acute incident, and he said that Mr.
Shalabi’s pain was “out of proportion to what [he] would expect from a direct injury weeks
ago.”

      Mr. Shalabi did not offer another medical opinion to contradict Dr. Ritchie’s. He
merely introduced a prescription from his personal physician, which may or may not have
been written for a work-related condition. Moreover, the Court is unpersuaded by Mr.
Shalabi’s contention that Dr. Ritchie referred him to a foot specialist, because that referral
might have been for a non-work-related condition.

       In sum, on this record, Mr. Shalabi has not shown entitlement to additional medical
treatment at this time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

   1. Amazon shall pay Mr. Shalabi past temporary disability benefits totaling $147.30.

   2. Mr. Shalabi’s request for additional treatment is denied.

   3. The Court sets a status hearing on January 17, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
      You must call 615-532-9552 or 866-943-0025 to participate.

   4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
      with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
      of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The
      Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this
      Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the
                                              4
      seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary
      confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for
      non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’
      Compensation Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

                                 ENTERED November 10, 2022.

                                 ________________________________________
                                 JUDGE KENNETH M. SWITZER
                                 Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

                                      Appendix

Technical record:
   1. Petition for Benefit Determination
   2. Dispute Certification Notice and Employer’s Additional Information
   3. Order Setting Status Hearing
   4. Order Resetting Status Hearing
   5. Hearing Request
   6. Employer’s Response to Employee’s Request for Expedited Benefits
   7. Employer’s Witness List

Evidence:
   1. Declaration of Mr. Shalabi
   2. Employer’s Exhibits
      2a. Employee’s excerpt from Dr. Ritchie
      2b. Medical records: Dr. Nevel, 9/16/21-9/24/21; Dr. Ritchie’s records, 10/5/21
      2c. Choice of Physician
      2d. Wage statement
      2e. Notice of Denial
      2f. Declaration of Ben Woods
   3. Mobic prescription
   4. September 27, 2021 email from Amazon to Mr. Shalabi
   5. October 4, 2021 letter from Amazon to Mr. Shalabi: Disability & Leave Services
   6. September 22, 2021 email from Amazon to Mr. Shalabi

                                           5
                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on November 10, 2022.

Name                   Certified   Regular       Email   Sent to
                       Mail        mail
Mina Shalabi,             X           X            X     276 White Bridge Pike #75
employee                                                 Nashville TN 37209
                                                         Anim2000_2000@yahoo.com

Terri Bernal,                                      X     Terri.Bernal@mgclaw.com
Stephen Morton,                                          Stephen.Morton@mgclaw.com
employer’s attorneys                                     Amber.Dennis@mgclaw.com

                                   _______________________________________
                                   Penny Shrum
                                   Clerk, Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
                                   WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

                                             6
                           Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

     If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

   1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
      Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the
      date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
      serve a copy upon all parties.

   2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
      calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
      any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
      alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
      website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
      completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
      result in dismissal of the appeal.

   3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
      from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
      the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
      it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
      parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
      the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
      Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
      Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
      concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
      a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

   4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
      business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
      party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
      days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
      statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
      expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
      the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
      argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
                                              NOTICE OF APPEAL
                                      Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
                                        www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
                                        wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

                                                                                  Docket No.: ________________________

                                                                                  State File No.: ______________________

                                                                                  Date of Injury: _____________________

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employee

         v.

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
                         [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties
Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
Email: __________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                           * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
Email: _________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                              * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

                                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

                                                           ______________________________________________
                                                            [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082