Court Opinion

ID: 5809239
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:43:30.650565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:48.460520
License: Public Domain

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine certain motions allegedly made in a case entitled People v Pettus, pending in that court under indictment No. 6013/02, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.
Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]).
The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.