Court Opinion

ID: 539407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:04.344750
License: Public Domain

900 F.2d 251Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Calvin FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;  Unit's Nurse (Mrs. Loftin);  Dr.Lanford, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6726.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Oct. 20, 1989.Decided:  Feb. 2, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-468-R)
Calvin Ford, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General;  Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Calvin Ford appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*   Ford v. Commonwealth of Virginia, C/A No. 88-468-R (E.D.Va. June 23, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 Even if Katherine Lee Loftin and Randolph Lanford are joined as defendants this action should be dismissed under Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)