Court Opinion

ID: 8451438
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:33:07.718328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.992309
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Kerry Lee Jammer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Jammer has filed a response. We have reviewed coun*322sel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jammer’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2. Jam-mer’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5tii Cir. R. 47.5.4.