Court Opinion

ID: 8450463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:02:18.138596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.075570
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George P. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s previous order denying Smith’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:00-er-00343-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.