Court Opinion

ID: 9665441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:48:44.56702+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:15.848627
License: Public Domain

O’Hara, J.
(concurring in result). I agree with the result reached by Judge Brennan.
*521I do not, however, agree that the four numbered elements set forth in his opinion constitute the requirements to establish a cause of action under the dramshop act.
In the case at bar, I think there was ample testimony, together with the reasonable inferences therefrom, to establish that there had been an unlawful sale of an alcoholic beverage to the claimed immediate tortfeasor. This raises a submissible jury question under the concerned statute,1 with, of course, proper instructions.

 MCLA 436.22; MSA 18.993.