Court Opinion

ID: 9838606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-07 00:00:30.741411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.967806
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40124       Document: 00516885272             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit

                                    ____________                                    FILED
                                                                             September 6, 2023
                                     No. 23-40124                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                   Summary Calendar                                 Clerk
                                   ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                           versus

   Timothy Andrew Hernandez,

                                             Defendant—Appellant.
                    ______________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:22-CR-947-1
                    ______________________________

   Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Timothy
   Andrew Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response.

          _____________________
          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
   should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
   forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 23-40124     Document: 00516885272         Page: 2    Date Filed: 09/06/2023

                                  No. 23-40124

   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.
         We note, however, that there is an apparent clerical error in the
   written judgment with respect to the date that the offense ended. Thus, we
   REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in
   accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

                                       2