Court Opinion

ID: 9947177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-03 09:17:01.472468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:10.673924
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2024.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                             NO. 14-22-00926-CR
                             NO. 14-22-00927-CR

                MARY FRANCES MCDONOUGH, Appellant
                                       V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                 On Appeal from the 400th District Court
                         Fort Bend County, Texas
         Trial Court Cause Nos. 19-DCR-087857 & 19-DCR-087858

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant appeals her convictions for money laundering and theft.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the
record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
      A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the
record was provided to her. On November 27, 2023, appellant filed a pro se
response to counsel’s brief.

      We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro
se response and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we
find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each
claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined
there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

      The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                         2