Court Opinion

ID: 5586659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:55:31.263989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:16.564116
License: Public Domain

Beck, P. J.
An execution issued from Tattnall superior court in favor of Mrs. Alice Anderson against W. U. Kogers, for the principal sum of $1456.60, besides interest and attorney’s fees, was levied upon a certain tract of land, to wit, the east half of land lot No. 200 in the 4th land district of Appling County, containing 292 acres, more or less, as the property of the defendant in fi. fa. J. C. Deal interposed a claim. The date of the fi. fa. was January 15, 1917, and that of the levy March 2, 1925. The issue made by the levy and the claim came on for trial, and the jury returned a verdict finding the land subject. The claimant made a motion for new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted.
We are of the opinion that the jury were authorized to return the verdict. In holding that the evidence authorized the *418verdict, of- course facts which the jury were authorized to find as true are considered as established. The evidence shows that the claimant bought the land in question from W. U. Eogers, of Tattnall County, for a consideration of $6000, and received from the vendor a bond for title dated October 3, 1910. Part of the purchase-price was paid in cash, and promissory notes were given for the balance, payable December 10, 1910, December 1, 1911, and December' 1, 1912. These notes were for $2000 each, but they were partly in payment for other lands in addition to that in controversy. The bond for title was recorded February 21, 1911, and the claimant went into possession of the laird. But it also appears that on January 21, 1908, Eogers executed to Mrs. Alice Anderson a deed to the land in controversy, to secure the payment of a debt of $799.25. This deed was recox*ded February 8, 1908. Eogers indorsed and1 transferred the purchase-money notes of Deal to the Glennville Bank, of Tattnall County, Georgia. Afterwards the bank brought suit against the claimant and obtained a judgment on the notes, and Eogers was sued as indorser in the same action. In order that the bank might levy on the land it became necessary that Eogers file a quitclaim deed placing title to the land in Deal for the purpose of levy and sale. Eogers, knowing that he had parted with the title to the land, procured a quitclaim deed from Mrs. Anderson to himself on August 1, 1914, and had it recorded on August 26, 1914, On August 4, 1914, a quitclaim deed from Eogers to the claimant was placed upon record for the purpose of having the fi. fa. in favor of the bank levied, and the levy was made. The land was advertised for sale while the quitclaim deed from Mrs. Anderson to Eogers was on record in Appling County. While the land was being advertised for sale, J. C., II. P., D. C., and C. D. Deal (J. C. Deal having transferred his bond for title to the three others named) filed a petition for injunction in Tattnall superior court on December 6, 1915, alleging, among other things, that “Your petitioners show that on October 1, 1910, J. C. Deal made and delivered to W. U. Eogers three promissory notes for the sum of $2000, and payable on the 10th day of December, 1910, December 1st, 1911, December 1st, 1912, respectively, with interest from date, at the rate of eight per cent, per annum. Said notes were given for the purchase-money of lot of land number 201, containing 490 acres, and the *419east half of lot of land number 200, consisting of 245 acres, both of said lots lying in the 4th district of Appling County, Georgia; that on the 3rd day of October, 1910, the said W. IT. Eogers made and executed to the said J. C. Deal a bond for title obligating himself, upon the payment of the above-described promissory notes, to make and execute to the said J. C. Deal good and sufficient warranty title to the above-described tracts of land, free from all encumbrances, and that he had good title to the same. Your petitioners further show that with respect to lot of land number 200 the said W. D. Eogers conveyed this property to Mrs. Alice Anderson as security for a sum of money which he had procured from her, and that said sum of money has never been repaid, and that the said Mrs. Alice Anderson is the true and rightful owner of said tract of land as security- for said money, which amounted to some $700 or $800, or other large sum.” This petition was sworn to by all the petitioners, including J. C. Deal, the claimant. While it was pending, Mrs. Anderson, on December 12, 1916, filed a petition in Tattnall superior court, seeking to have the quitclaim deed dated August 14, 1914, from herself to Eogers, canceled upon the ground that the same was obtained through fraud. This last case was tried and resulted in a verdict and decree in favor of Mrs. Anderson for cancellation of the deed from herself to Eogers; and a certified copy of the decree was ordered to be placed upon the records of Appling County, Georgia, and this was done on March 22, 1918. In the meantime, pending all this litigation Mrs. Anderson brought suit and obtained a judgment on January 5, 1917, upon the original $799.25 note. An execution issued on this judgment was placed upon the general execution docket of Appling County. In the meantime the bank made another attempt to sell the land, based on its execution; and J. C.. Deal again filed another petition for injunction, alleging that the land was levied on as his property and was to be sold to satisfy the bank’s judgment and execution against him for $3732 principal, and $530 interest; and that there was due on the execution, on May 17, 1918, $3543.20. Pending this litigation Eogers died, and J. C. Beasley was appointed administrator of his estate. After the death of Eogers, Mrs. Anderson obtained her judgment cancelling the deed from herself to Eogers, and a judgment based upon a promissory note to secure the payment of which Eogers *420had executed the first deed above mentioned. In order that she might levy her fi. fa. upon the land Mrs. Anderson filed and had recorded, July 8, 1920, a quitclaim deed to the land in controversy, placing the title in Beasley as administrator of the estate of Rogers; on which levy Beasley filed a claim.
The statement of facts is somewhat extended, but all are essential; and when considered, they show clearly that the verdict finding the property subject was authorized, iE not'demanded by the evidence. The title to the land for the purpose of Securing a debt passed into Mrs. Anderson two years before J. O. Deal bought from Rogers and received his bond for title. There is evidence to show that J. C. Deal had notice of the fact that the deed from Rogers to Mrs. Anderson, though an absolute warranty deed in form, was made for the purpose of securing a debt. The jury were also authorized to find that while Mrs. Anderson quitclaimed the property back to Rogers, she subsequently obtained a decree annulling this conveyance because it had been obtained by fraud. If the claimant, between the date of the quitclaim deed from Mrs. Anderson to Rogers and the date of the judgment annulling the deed or the filing of suit to have it annuled, had completed the payment of the purchase-money, it might be that he would have had a complete equitable title to the land. But no payments were made by him (as the jury had a right to find) between the date of Mrs. Anderson’s quitclaim deed to Rogers and of her proceedings to have that deed annuled. On December 4, 1915, J. C. Deal brought his equitable suit against the Glennville Bank, in which are made the allegations set forth above, and among them is the positive statement that “Mrs. Anderson is the true owner of said tract of land [the land in question] as security for said money, which amounted to $700 or $800, or other large sum.” In this petition filed by the claimant and others was a prayer that the Glennville Bank and W. TJ. Rogers be required to refund to petitioners the amount of money which they had paid upon the purchase-price of the land, “unless they shall perfect title thereto.”
The rulings in headnotes 2 to 7 require no elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.