Court Opinion

ID: 1010842
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:18:02.500618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:32.979323
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6640

DARIUS T. HILL,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

             versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION; UNITED
STATES MARINE CORPS; UNITED STATES NAVY,

                                             Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-807-5-BR3)

Submitted:    June 12, 2003                   Decided:   June 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darius T. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Darius T. Hill, a military prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000).   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Hill v. United States Dep’t of Prob., No. CA-01-807-5-BR3 (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 11, 2003).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2