Court Opinion

ID: 3086382
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:49:12.458119+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:53.807313
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00104-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER
PYREK-ARMITAGE,                                                             Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 347th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Christopher Pyrek-Armitage, attempted to perfect an appeal from a

conviction for forgery. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

      This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent
a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       The trial court imposed sentence in this matter on February 20, 2013. Appellant

filed his notice of appeal on February 5, 2014. On February 14, 2014, the Clerk of this

Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected and that

the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the

date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not filed a response to the Court’s

directive.

       Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after

the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a

timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.               See id. R.

26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days

after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion

complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 26.3.

       Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than eleven months after sentence was

imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.           See

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing

a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

                                             2
CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (West, Westlaw through 3d. C.S. 2013); see

also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

      The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                              PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
27th day of March, 2014.

                                          3