Court Opinion

ID: 9786669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 00:00:30.461801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:03.303681
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10879         Document: 00516878419             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/30/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10879
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               August 30, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Richard Eugene Turner,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 6:21-CR-37-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Richard Eugene Turner has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Turner has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10879     Document: 00516878419          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/30/2023

                                   No. 22-10879

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                            2