Court Opinion

ID: 9901644
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-22 07:09:27.581751+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:36.629789
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed November 16, 2023

                                    S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00963-CV

  IN RE PRAIRIE LINK CONSTRUCTORS JV; FLUOR ENTERPRISES,
   INC.; AND BALFOUR BEATTY INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., Relators

          Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-13917

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                   Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy
                           Opinion by Justice Kennedy
      In their September 29, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators seek relief

from the trial court’s August 25, 2023 order granting a motion to quash relators’

subpoena and notice of deposition by written questions to Foresight Planning &

Engineering Services, LLC.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relators failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Nancy Kennedy/
                                         NANCY KENNEDY
                                         JUSTICE
230963F.P05

                                      –2–