Court Opinion

ID: 5450817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 18:37:59.836323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:22.519928
License: Public Domain

PETERS, J. pro tem.
I dissent.
I agree with the holding of the majority that Judge Vickers was not disqualified. The motion to vacate was properly denied on that ground, but should have been granted for the reasons set forth in full in the dissent in Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co., this day filed, supra, p. 344 [139 P.2d 908].
Traynor, J., concurred.
Appellants’ petition for a rehearing was denied July 22, 1943. Traynor, J., and Peters, J. pro tem., voted for a rehearing.