Court Opinion

ID: 9865618
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 19:08:34.322005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:42.704216
License: Public Domain

ON. MOTION FOR REHEARING.
In the motion for rehearing it is contended that the judgment of the ordinary approving certain expenditures set forth in the annual return of the guardian was void for the reason that the return shows on its face that the expenditures were not for the maintenance or education of the ward. In answer to this contention, we have added on page 4 of the opinion the following sentence: “Moreover, the return of the expenditures does not show on its face that the expenditures were not for such items as could be allowed for the maintenance or education of the ward.” Rehearing denied.