Court Opinion

ID: 7151568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:00:24.878624+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:08.738703
License: Public Domain

OPINION OE THE 0OURT BY
JUDGE KoBERTSON :
Considering the condition of the old father Emanuel Tliggenbothom, the influence of his sons George and William who could mould him like clay in the hands of the potter, the gross inadequacy of the ostensible consideration, the strong probability that none of it was paid by George, and the extreme doubtfulness of any payment by William, and the fact and circumstances conducing to show a fraudulent purpose and sinister consummation, by these two sons, and proving-, that the conveyances now litigated *552were finally extorted from tbeir father and mother by assurances that the lands should be held in trust for all their-heirs, subject to equal distribution among them at his death; such a trust, both express and implied, is the plain and inevitable conclusion of reason and of law.

Bradley, Dunlap, for appellant.

Turner, for appellee.

Consequently, as the appellants had no cause of action until the old man’s death and a refusal to fulfill the trust, neither a statutory nor presumptive bar applies to this case.
Wherefore, the judgment dismissing the petition against George and .William is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings for distribution, by sale or otherwise, of the lands among all the heirs and an equitable adjustment of the rights of all parties.
But the judgment dismissing the petition against Davis is affirmed.