Court Opinion

ID: 8452240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:57:37.340433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.702424
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andrew William Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:08-cr-00502-JCC-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.