Court Opinion

ID: 3169191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-13 16:06:20.635311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:02:47.677590
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 15-0702
                             Filed January 13, 2016

STATE OF IOWA,
     Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KELLY ROBERT HILPIPRE,
     Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Martha L. Mertz,

Judge.

      A defendant appeals, claiming his sentence is illegal. AFFIRMED.

      Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Shellie L. Knipfer, Assistant

Appellate Defender, for appellant.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kevin Cmelik and Sheryl A.

Soich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

      Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Doyle and Tabor, JJ.
                                           2

DOYLE, Judge.

       Kelly Hilpipre entered an Alford plea1 to willful injury causing bodily injury

and domestic abuse assault. The district court entered judgment and sentence,

which included prison terms.       Hilpipre now appeals, arguing his sentence is

illegal because the offenses of willful injury and domestic assault should merge.

Illegal sentences may be corrected at any time. See State v. Love, 858 N.W.2d
721, 723 (Iowa 2015).

       A person may not be convicted of an “offense which is necessarily

included in another public offense of which the person is convicted.” Iowa Code

§ 701.9 (2013).    In 2001, the Iowa Supreme Court concluded the crimes of

domestic abuse assault and willful injury do not merge, explaining:

       It is at once apparent that the domestic abuse assault charges
       contain an element not found in the willful injury charge: “The act
       occurred between household members who resided together at the
       time of the incident.” Thus, it is possible to commit the greater
       offense without also committing the lesser offenses. Consequently,
       the domestic abuse assault convictions are not “necessarily
       included” in the willful injury conviction.

State v. Rodriquez, 636 N.W.2d 234, 247 (Iowa 2001); see also State v. Scott,

No. 10-1160, 2012 WL 664635, at *1-2 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 29, 2012) (“It is clear

that willful injury may be committed without committing domestic abuse assault

with the intent to inflict a serious injury, as willful injury does not require a family

or household relationship.     For this reason, domestic abuse assault with the

intent to inflict a serious injury is not ‘necessarily included’ in the willful injury

1
 An Alford plea allows a defendant to consent to the imposition of a sentence without
admitting participation in the crime. North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970).
                                          3

conviction, and the district court did not err in entering separate judgments and

sentences for each crime.” (internal citation omitted)).

       Hilpipre asks us to overrule Rodriquez.       As an intermediate appellate

court, we have no such power. See State v. Miller, 841 N.W.2d 583, 584 n.1

(Iowa 2014) (“Generally, it is the role of the supreme court to decide if case

precedent should no longer be followed.”); State v. Eichler, 83 N.W.2d 576, 578

(Iowa 1957) (“If our previous holdings are to be overruled, we should ordinarily

prefer to do it ourselves.”); State v. Hastings, 466 N.W.2d 697, 700 (Iowa Ct.

App. 1990) (“We are not at liberty to overturn Iowa Supreme Court precedent.”).

       Based on Rodriquez, we decline to merge the crimes. See 636 N.W.2d at

247; State v. Pittman, No. 14-2124, 2015 WL 7686995, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov.

25, 2015). Accordingly, we affirm Hilpipre’s convictions and sentence.

       AFFIRMED.