Court Opinion

ID: 989740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:11:16.382774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:38.693197
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6243

SAMUEL JAMES USSERY,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

CHARLES HILL, Superintendent,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-95-22-5-MU)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                  Decided:   July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel James Ussery, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ussery v. Hill, No.
CA-95-22-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 1995). We deny Appellant's motions

for appointment of counsel and for general relief. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2