Court Opinion

ID: 1007601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:27:47.245536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:53.992008
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-6023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Respondent - Appellee,

          versus

PATRICIA RAE FRUETEL,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-91-70)

Submitted:   April 29, 2002                   Decided:   May 20, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Patricia   Rae   Fruetel   appeals   the   district   court’s   order

denying her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   United States v. Fruetel, No. CR-91-70 (E.D. Va. Nov. 26,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                   2