Court Opinion

ID: 568226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:33:52.796462
License: Public Domain

944 F.2d 902
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gino Renaldo ESTEP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7627.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.Decided Sept. 16, 1991.As Amended Oct. 23, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.  (CR-85-320-K)
Gino Renaldo Estep, appellant pro se.
Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Gino Renaldo Estep appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Estep, CR-85-320-K (D.Md. June 26, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.