Court Opinion

ID: 9351710
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-03 14:08:25.875548+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:28.789147
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                        San Antonio, Texas
                                             December 28, 2022

                                            No. 04-22-00819-CR

                                        IN RE Ross HENDRICKS

                                             Original Proceeding 1

                                                    ORDER

        On December 7, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented
by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906
S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means
relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review.
See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig.
proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8(a).

        It is so ORDERED on December 28, 2022.

                                                                      _____________________________
                                                                      Irene Rios, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 28th day of December, 2022.

                                                                      _____________________________
                                                                      Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CR11156, styled State of Texas v. Ross Hendricks, pending in the 144th
Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.