Court Opinion

ID: 5424617
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:38:15.849995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:23.642463
License: Public Domain

Hammer, J.
(dissenting). I dissent and vote for affirmance. The evidence warranted the court in accepting the version of plaintiff, a conditional vendor. The illegal seizure in New Jersey did not give defendants’ possession which can be made the basis of a lien. (Owl Wet Wash Laundry Co., Inc., v. Karish, 188 N. Y. Supp. 782; Smith v. Pierce Arrow Sales Corp., 224 App. Div. 769; Sterling Motor Truck Co. v. Lavan, 260 N. Y. 43.)