Court Opinion

ID: 4090499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-19 00:01:26.139386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:05.346796
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-20066      Document: 00513722118         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/18/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-20066
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         October 18, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR HUGO BADILLO-AMAYA, also known as Jesse Gutierrez Cantu,
also known as Hector Hugo Badillo, also known as Hector Hugo Badilla-
Amaya, also known as Hector Hugo Badillo Amaya, also known as Hector Hugo
Badilla,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:15-CR-490-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Hugo
Badillo-Amaya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Badillo-Amaya has not filed a response.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-20066    Document: 00513722118   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/18/2016

                               No. 16-20066

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein.   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2