Court Opinion

ID: 8608337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 05:39:12.18986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.425068
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Maria Alice Da Silva, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia and denying her motion to reconsider the IJ’s denial of her motion to reopen. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see Lo v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 934, 937 (9th Cir. 2003), we grant in part and dismiss in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.
The IJ abused his discretion in denying Da Silva’s motion to reopen based on Da Silva’s attorney acknowledged responsibility for Da Silva’s failure to appear at her hearing. We remand to the IJ for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.
*672We lack jurisdiction to consider Da Silva’s contention that the IJ erred in denying her motion to consolidate her case with her brother’s case because she did not raise this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that exhaustion of an alleged procedural error is mandatory and jurisdictional).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.