Court Opinion

ID: 3205539
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-20 19:00:51.335104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:27.298253
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 15-7934

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

RICHARD A. SANTIAGO, a/k/a Rick,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1)

Submitted:   May 18, 2016                     Decided:   May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Santiago, Appellant Pro Se.           Angela Mastandrea-
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney,       Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Richard     A.    Santiago      appeals     the    district          court’s      order

denying     his     motion      for     a     sentence    reduction              pursuant   to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).                 We have reviewed the record and

find   no   reversible         error.         Accordingly,          we    affirm     for    the

reasons     stated      by     the    district     court.            United        States    v.

Santiago, No. 3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2015).                                 We

dispense     with       oral    argument       because        the        facts     and   legal

conclusions       are   adequately          presented    in    the       materials       before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                              2