Court Opinion

ID: 1009913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:03:36.109699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:35:20.621192
License: Public Domain

Rehearing granted, June 24, 2003

                             UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-7720

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DENNY R. GULLETT,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-94-17, CA-97-456-2)

Submitted:   January 21, 2003               Decided:   March 7, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.
Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Denny R. Gullett seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Gullett has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.     See United States v.

Gullett, Nos. CR-94-17; CA-97-456-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2