Court Opinion

ID: 7216901
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 02:20:43.711482+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:17:02.522315
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Dani Dalai seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel and an interpreter and the district court’s order denying his motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Dalai seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.