Court Opinion

ID: 2667495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-04 13:53:38.889727+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:12.659045
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                                 AUG 13 2009
                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                             Clerk, U.S. District and
                               FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA                               Bankruptcy Courts

Douglas McLaren,                                 )
                                                 )
                  Plaintiff,                     )
                                                 )
                  v.                             )       Civil Action No.           09 1525
                                                 )
Leon Edward Panetta, CIA Director,               )
                                                 )
                  Defendant.                     )

                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

           This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis,

pro se complaint, motion for immediate injunction, motion to seal, and motion for appointed

legal counsel. The court will grant the application, dismiss the complaint because it fails to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted against this defendant, and deny all pending motions as

moot.

           The complaint seeks "immediate relief of phys[ic]al, civil momentary harm," Complaint

at 2, and 4.7 trillion dollars in damages, id at 4. The remainder ofthe four pages of the

complaint consists of incoherent phrases and terms, such as the following:

           Religious persecution, political persecution, difirmation [sic], slander, criminal
           slander, discrim[in]ation, racism, reverse racism discrim[in]ation. Sexual
           harassment harassment, invasion of privacy invasion criminal invasion of privacy
           violation of domain, to violations of sovereign domain. Invasion of domain of
           legal filings, retal[ia]tory acts. Interference with legal filings ....

Id at 2.

           This court is obligated by federal law to dismiss a complaint that is filed without

prepayment of filing fees whenever it determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Here, the complaint does not

contain any factual allegations to establish that the plaintiff has suffered an injury attributable to

the defendant. In fact, the defendant is not mentioned by name or reference outside the caption

of the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief may be

granted against the defendant, and the court will dismiss the complaint.

       An appropriate order accompanies this memorand

                                                 -2-