Court Opinion

ID: 1012856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:51:37.787666+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:17.955271
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 04-6192

In Re:   JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS,

                                                          Petitioner.

             On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-45)

Submitted:    February 25, 2004             Decided:   March 25, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

            Jermaine Jerrell Sims petitions for a writ of mandamus.

He seeks an order setting aside his multiple criminal convictions.

            Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought.     See In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).     Further, mandamus

is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary

circumstances.    See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S.

394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.       See In re

United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979).

            The relief sought by Sims is not available by way of

mandamus.   Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

deny the motion to vacate the restitution order, and dismiss the

petition for writ of mandamus.      We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                  PETITION DISMISSED

                                - 2 -