Court Opinion

ID: 999474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:26:19.152326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:28.781236
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DELTON SCOTT STEVENS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-90-310, CA-94-3380-6)

Submitted:   July 30, 1999                 Decided:   August 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Delton Scott Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Delton Scott Stevens seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Stevens, Nos. CR-90-310;

CA-94-3380-6 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1998).   We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2