Court Opinion

ID: 4062057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 20:23:11.72715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:48.339198
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-84,183-01

                       EX PARTE SKEETER RAY RUCKER, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
            CAUSE NO. L-14-0122-CR-HC1 IN THE 156TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM LIVE OAK COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted

of evading arrest. He was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

        Applicant contends that he was not given notice of an extraneous offense used against him.

The indictment charges Applicant with evading arrest using a vehicle and allege two sequential

felony convictions. As charged, this offense is           a state jail felony.   TEXAS PENAL CODE

§38.04(1)(B). The indictment does not allege any serious bodily injury, nor does it allege that
                                                                                                      2

Applicant had been previously convicted of evading arrest. As indicted, this charge would be subject

to a punishment range of 2-20 years’ incarceration. TEXAS PENAL CODE §12.425(b). Applicant’s

sentence may be outside of the applicable punishment range.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court

may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

         The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to whether

Applicant was previously convicted of evading arrest. The trial court shall make findings as to

whether Applicant was aware of the proper punishment range for the offense. The trial court shall

also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: December 9, 2015
Do not publish