Court Opinion

ID: 9828045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:02:32.475236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:42.184521
License: Public Domain

On Motion of Appellants for a Rehearing.
At the trial appellee contended he was on his own land at the time, if he struck Brewer with a hammer, and that Brewer was a mere trespasser thereon. Appellants of- . fered evidence to prove that the land instead *271was part of a public road, and assigned as error the action of the court in excluding such evidence. We think appellants had a right to make such proof, and that it was error to refuse to permit them to do so.
We do not think this court and the trial court erred in other respects specified in the motion.