Court Opinion

ID: 8877930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 19:40:07.798717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:28.374351
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
While we think the District Court had jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, particularly to determine the bona fides of the partnership in which the bankrupt was a limited partner, we agree, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, filed on July 6, 1967,1 that the bankrupt’s interest as a limited partner gave the bankruptcy court no power to administer real estate owned by the partnership or to enjoin its sale under foreclosure by the mortgagee.
Affirmed.

. In re Panitz & Co., D.Md., 270 F.Supp. 448.