Court Opinion

ID: 63522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 04:58:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:05.690876
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                   FILED
                                                                  August 6, 2008
                                 No. 08-10332
                              Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK ANDREW TRAMMEL

                                            Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 5:00-CR-117-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mark Andrew Trammel
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114,
119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to
determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-10332

     2