Court Opinion

ID: 4092863
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-26 15:06:58.131659+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:27.813266
License: Public Domain

SUAREZ, C.J.
 

  Appellant Kristine Rodriguez appeals the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission’s dismissal of her appeal from an appeals referee’s decision that she was not entitled to unemployment benefits.
  
   1
  
  We affirm.
 

  The record establishes that the disqualification decision was issued on November 19, 2015. Appellant was properly notified of the decision and was properly advised of her right to appeal within 20 calendar days of the decision. Appellant did not request review until January 19, 2016, a date well past the time for appeal. On January 28, 2016 Appellant was ordered to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant was again properly advised that she should respond to the order within 10
   
   *199
   
  calendar days. Appellant failed to respond to that order and, as a result, on February 23, 2016 her appeal was dismissed by the Commission on February 23,2016.
 

  Because Appellant let the time periods for both the appeal and the show cause order run, we affirm the dismissal of her appeal.
 

  Affirmed.
 

   1
  

   . In her Initial Brief Appellant discusses a separate order which required her to repay benefits already paid. However, that order is not the subject of this appeal and we do not address the substance of that order.