Court Opinion

ID: 9533572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:32:43.523005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:05.397394
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE McCULLOUGH, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on accountability but do not agree that the defendant is foreclosed from receiving 140 days’ credit for time served as conceded by the State. Here the defendant, the State, and this court agree that "defendant was entitled to 140 days of credit.” 289 Ill. App. 3d at 356. Woodard (175 Ill. 2d at 450, 677 N.E.2d at 942) concerned a $5 credit " 'upon application of the defendant.’ ” Even though no application was made, there was no waiver. I refer to my dissent in People v. Moore, 289 Ill. App. 3d 357 (1997).