Court Opinion

ID: 9741628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:59:41.882763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:57:19.925295
License: Public Domain

Fairchild, J.
(dissenting in part; concurring in part). With respect to the charge of aggravated battery, it is my conclusion that the evidence describing Mrs. Zilke’s head injury was sufficient to make it a question of fact whether or not it was “serious bodily injury.” The court having found as a fact that it was such injury, I would affirm the judgment on that charge.
With respect to the charge of attempted robbery, I concur in the affirmance of the conviction, but am of the opinion that upon the record presented it was unnecessary to determine that it was error to refuse to admit Dr. Kindwall’s testimony.