Court Opinion

ID: 2686634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-31 16:00:42.5794+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:47:27.891401
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 13-3789
                      ___________________________

                               James P. Kenefick

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                         v.

           Francis Howell School District; Eric Pavia; Mike Deters

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                    ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                ____________

                           Submitted: July 28, 2014
                             Filed: July 31, 2014
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       James Kenefick appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his civil
complaint upon a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion. Upon careful de
novo review, see Minn. Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051, 1055 (8th Cir.) (standard
of review), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 824 (2013), we agree with the district court that
Kenefick failed to state a facially plausible claim, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,
678 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

                                          -2-