Court Opinion

ID: 3099570
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:59:47.291016+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:51.918565
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00209-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL.,                                              Appellants,

                                          v.

SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC.,                Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 347th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                  Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      This appeal was abated by this Court on April 23, 2009, due to the bankruptcy of

one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. ' 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 8.

The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by

parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. The parties request that this Court
dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining

Company, Inc. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to

dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal of all claims

asserted by the parties against Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

      In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party

incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court

will tax costs against the appellant.").   Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                              PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th
day of October, 2011.

                                            2