Court Opinion

ID: 9911196
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 18:01:44.609359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:56:36.649888
License: Public Domain

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

                                 Before
                        KISOR, DALY, and MIZER
                        Appellate Military Judges

                        _________________________

                           UNITED STATES
                               Appellee

                                      v.

                         Ian A. SCHMIDT
                   Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps
                               Appellant

                             No. 202300069

                        _________________________

                        Decided: 19 December 2023

    Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                               Military Judge:
                               Adam M. King

 Sentence adjudged 26 October 2022 by a general court-martial con-
 vened at Marine Corps Base Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting
 of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:
 reduction to E-1, confinement for 28 months, and a bad-conduct dis-
 charge. 1

                             For Appellant:
                     Captain Colin W. Hotard, USMC

 1 Appellant was credited with have served 307 days of pretrial confinement.
              United States v. Schmidt, NMCCA No. 202300069
                            Opinion of the Court

                           _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                           _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case,
we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct
in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. 2
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                  FOR THE COURT:

                                  MARK K. JAMISON
                                  Clerk of Court

   2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

                                         2