Court Opinion

ID: 9374399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-22 21:00:26.664067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:46.894855
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1948      Doc: 12         Filed: 02/21/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-1948

        WILLIAM VERRINDER,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        FRANK BLAIR WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Wake County
        Estates and Wills Division; STACY PRETTY, in her official capacity as deputy
        clerk of the Wake County Estates and Wills Division; TYLER SMITH, in his
        official capacity as deputy clerk of the Wake County Estates and Wills Division;
        GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00167-FL)

        Submitted: February 16, 2023                                  Decided: February 21, 2023

        Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        William Verrinder, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1948      Doc: 12         Filed: 02/21/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               William Verrinder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.

        § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

        we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.      Verrinder v. Williams, No.

        5:22-cv-00167-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the

        facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2