Court Opinion

ID: 5140345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-23 22:08:40.860215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:04.386590
License: Public Domain

People v Raymond (2021 NY Slip Op 07433)

People v Raymond

2021 NY Slip Op 07433

Decided on December 23, 2021

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

1052 KA 18-01924

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vLATOYA D. RAYMOND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered July 9, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of her sentence (see People v Hoffman, 191 AD3d 1262, 1263 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 36 NY3d 1097 [2021]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: December 23, 2021
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court