Court Opinion

ID: 3107206
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:12:08.483004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:46.681518
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00276-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
FIDENCIO FLORES, JR.,
                                                      APPELLANT,
 
                                                             v.
 
MELDEN AND HUNT,                                                                 APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________
 
                           On
Appeal from the 92nd District Court 
                                       of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                               Before
Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Fidencio Flores, Jr., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd
District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-596-09-A.  On
February 14, 2011, the appeal was abated to allow the parties an opportunity to
enter into a settlement agreement.  This appeal is hereby REINSTATED.  
Appellant
has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that he believes
the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. 
Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the
opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the
appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
and our mandate will issue forthwith.
 
PER
CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
24th day of March, 2011.