Court Opinion

ID: 5556973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:42:59.663844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:21.732149
License: Public Domain

Warner, Chief Justice.
This was a rule against the sheriff, calling upon him to show cause why he should not be attached for contempt for failure to make the money due on a mortgagej?. fa. placed in his hands. The sheriff filed his answer to the rule, and the court, after considering the same, made the rule absolute, and ordered an attachment for contempt of court to be issued against the sheriff; whereupon, he excepted. When a sheriff is ruled for contempt of the process of the court, and files his answer, and the same is not denied, the rule shall be discharged, or made absolute according as the court may deem the answer sufficient or not: Code, 3954. The court may have deemed the answer of the sheriff evasive and insufficient, and for that reason made the rule absolute. We find nothing in this record that will authorize this court to control the discretion of the court below in making the rule absolute and ordering an attachment to issue against the sheriff.
Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.