Court Opinion

ID: 1005161
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:52:34.049601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:25.326369
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6813

BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARTY LOUDERMILK, Detective; CHRIS WARREN,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-37-2-MU)

Submitted:   August 23, 2001                 Decided:   August 30, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bart Fitzgerald McClain, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Bart Fitzgerald McClain appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny McClain’s motion

for general relief and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McClain v. Loudermilk, No. CA-01-37-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 25,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2