Court Opinion

ID: 2962365
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:56:53.543924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:01.234204
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          February 11, 1994     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 93-1776                                              MAXWELL M. TAYLOR,                                Petitioner, Appellant,                                          v.                         CHARLES T. COBB, DISTRICT DIRECTOR,                      U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,                                Respondent, Appellee.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ___________________               Maxwell M. Taylor, on brief pro se.               _________________               A. John  Pappalardo, United  States Attorney,  and Naomi  G.               ___________________                                _________          Litvin, Special Assistant United  States Attorney, Department  of          ______          Justice,  Immigration  &  Naturalization  Service,  on brief  for          appellee.                                  __________________                                  __________________                      Per  Curiam.   We have reviewed the parties' briefs                      ___________            and the record on appeal.   We find no error in the  district            court's  denial of  the petition for  writ of  habeas corpus.            The  Attorney General  has six  months from  the date  of the            final  administrative order  of deportation, or,  if judicial            review is sought (such as was the case here), six months from            the date of final order of this court, to effect deportation.            8 U.S.C.    1252(c).  That period had not expired at the time            of  Taylor's  habeas  petition.    Indeed,  it  has  not  yet            commenced to run.                 Affirmed.                 _________                                         -3-