Court Opinion

ID: 2923283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:28:49.217275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:38:57.897851
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-05-634-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________
 
JERRY BAROS, ET AL.,                                           Appellants,
 
                                           v.
 
A. W.
CHESTERTON COMPANY, ET AL.,                     Appellees.
_______________________________________________________
 
                  On appeal from the 319th
District Court
                           of Nueces
County, Texas.
_______________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
                  Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and
Castillo
                             Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
 
Appellants, JERRY BAROS, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order
entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces
County, Texas, in cause 98-06468-G.  The clerk=s record was received on March 10,
2006.  

A review of the clerk=s record in this cause
fails to affirmatively reflect that this Court has jurisdiction over this
appeal.  First, the record fails to
reflect that the order from which this appeal is taken is a final, appealable
judgment.  Second, it appears that
parties have filed suggestions of bankruptcy; however, the record fails to
reflect that any bankruptcy stay has been lifted or the case otherwise remanded
to the trial court.   Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of these defects
was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be
done.  Appellants were advised that, if
the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this
notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellants failed to file a response as
requested by this Court=s notice. 
The Court, having
considered the documents on file and appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The
appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 8th day of June, 2006.