Court Opinion

ID: 5119307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-19 16:00:41.707385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:12.221710
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-14742      Date Filed: 10/19/2021   Page: 1 of 2

                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 20-14742
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HENRY BULLOCK,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Middle District of Florida
          D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00012-CEH-CPT-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-14742         Date Filed: 10/19/2021    Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                 20-14742

Before JORDAN, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Thomas Burns, counsel for Henry Bullock in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor-
nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.