Court Opinion

ID: 9938549
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:03:27.887983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:09.945282
License: Public Domain

It is with much reluctance that I concur in the result reached by the main opinion. It is my hope that our Supreme Court will take the opportunity, if one is presented to it, either to address anew the adequacy under Rule 59.1, Ala. R. Civ. P., of extension language of the nature utilized by the trial court in this case or at least to address the correctness of this court's conclusion today that the specific language used by the trial court in this case was inadequate to satisfy the requirements for extending the 90-day period for ruling on postjudgment motions under that rule. *Page 1149