Court Opinion

ID: 8681756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:29:12.865665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.776154
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Iana Rata, a native and citizen of Moldova, and her husband, derivative beneficiary Ara A. Tiratsvyan, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Rata’s motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and Rata’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 *360F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Rata (B.I.A. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED