Court Opinion

ID: 9793441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:47:40.421572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:02.327076
License: Public Domain

JOHNSON, Justice.
I respectfully dissent with the majority opinion for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in the companion case, Porter v. Stanford, — Ariz. —, 347 P.2d 38.
It is my opinion that the order issued by the respondent court requiring the receiver of the Arizona Hotel to make support payments to Gladys E. Porter from the property entrusted to the receiver prior to a determination of its status as community or partnership property is void; and therefore the charging lien issued by a court of competent jurisdiction takes priority.
I would make permanent the writ of prohibition heretofore issued.