Court Opinion

ID: 903237
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-19 05:18:23.844072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:56.040663
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-10981       Document: 00512277787         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 18, 2013
                                     No. 12-10981
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN RAMIREZ-MEDINA, also known as Juan Medina Ramirez, also known
as Juan Medina-Ramirez, also known as Juan Medina, also known as Juan
Ramirez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:12-CR-44-1

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Ramirez-Medina
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Medina has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-10981    Document: 00512277787    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/18/2013

                                No. 12-10981

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2