Court Opinion

ID: 7786882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:24:20.272915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:18.105979
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the employer/carrier’s (E/C) response to this court’s order to show cause dated December 4, 2006, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not a reviewable adverse order. See Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell, 547 So.2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). If, in the future, claimant files another petition for benefits seeking benefits from the E/C, the E/C may assert their affirmative defense of misrepresentation at that time.
DISMISSED.
WOLF, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.