Court Opinion

ID: 9364599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-19 19:00:18.59147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:39.293387
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40256         Document: 00516615951             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/19/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                    FILED
                                                                                January 19, 2023
                                       No. 21-40256                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar                                 Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Chance Wallace,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 1:15-CR-1101-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Chance Wallace has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Wallace has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Wallace’s
   response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 21-40256     Document: 00516615951           Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/19/2023

                                    No. 21-40256

   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.
          We note, however, that there is a clerical error in the written
   judgment. As a condition of supervised release, the district court ordered
   that Wallace “not reside, work, access, or loiter within [500] yards of school
   yards, playgrounds, arcades, or other places primarily used by children under
   the age of 18 or where children may frequently congregate unless approved
   in writing in advance by the United States Probation Officer.” The written
   judgment misstates the distance involved as 500 “feet.” Accordingly, we
   REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in
   accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

                                         2