Court Opinion

ID: 2691317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:01:55.192353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:17.728377
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1202, 2011-Ohio-1081.]

                          DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LARGE.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1202, 2011-Ohio-1081.]
 (No. 2009-0041 — Submitted February 3, 2011 — Decided February 10, 2011.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, John Harold Large, Attorney
Registration No. 0068732, last known business address in Warren, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 6, 2009,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St. 3d
35, 2009-Ohio-2022, 907 N.E.2d 1162.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                               ______________________