Court Opinion

ID: 9964860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-01 03:00:44.623587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:44.678529
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-3216
                        ___________________________

                           Subba Rao Chalamalesetty

                                     Plaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

    Ur Jaddou, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Antony J.
                  Blinken, Secretary, U.S. Department of State

                                   Defendants - Appellees
                                 ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                     for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: April 25, 2024
                              Filed: April 30, 2024
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before COLLOTON, Chief Judge, BENTON and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                            ____________

PER CURIAM.

     In this action brought under the Administrative Procedures Act, Subba Rao
Chalamalesetty, a native and citizen of India, appeals the district court’s1 final

      1
      The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
judgment dismissing the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Having
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

       On de novo review, see Great Rivers Habitat All. v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt.
Agency, 615 F.3d 985, 988 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), this court agrees
that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to review Chalamalesetty’s
claims. See Thigulla v. Jaddou, 94 F.4th 770, 773-78 (8th Cir. 2024); see also
Cheejati v. Blinken, No. 23-40398, 2024 WL 1517635, at *6 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2024).

      The judgment is affirmed.
                      ______________________________

                                         -2-