Court Opinion

ID: 9413858
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 23:26:55.805437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:24.936083
License: Public Domain

*223REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, specially
concurring:
This court’s writing in Hopwood, upon which the instant judgment is reversed, was inconsistent with the judgment of the Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct. 2733, 57 L.Ed.2d 750 (1978) and was unnecessary to the holding or judgment of the Hopwood court. This circuit court, however, considers that Hopwood writing to be binding law. I concur here in the judgment only.