Court Opinion

ID: 7894607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:51:43.976623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:32:01.874123
License: Public Domain

Alvey, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case must prevail.
There was no hill of exception taken in the trial of the cause, as authorized by the Act of 1872, ch. 316. An appeal is given by that Act in criminal cases, but only from rulings and determinations of the Court in the course of the trial, as is practiced in civil cases. But where bills of exceptions are taken, and an appeal is prosecuted under the Act, the final judgment is required to be withheld or suspended until the question presented hy the bills of exceptions are decided by the Court of Appeals. As no exceptions were taken no appeal lies under the Act; the right of appeal under that statute being confined exclusively to the cases where exceptions are taken in the course of the trial. In this case, the ruling from which the appeal is taken was made in overruling a demurrer to the indictment, which was not the subject of a bill of exception, and therefore not within the provisions of the Act of 1872, ch. 316. That ruling could, properly, only be reviewed on writ of error, or a proceeding in the nature of a writ of error, as prescribed by Rule 1 for the regulation of appeals to this Court; 29 Md., 1; and which could not be resorted to or availed of by the party until there is a final judgment against him. Here, there has been no final judgment rendered, and consequently the case was not in a condition to be removed by writ of error or proceeding substituted for that writ. When the final judgment shall have been rendered, then it will be competent to the accused to take the proceeding substituted under the rule for the formal writ of error, in order to have the judgment on demurrer reviewed by this Court. That will be done by virtue of his right at common law, and not under the Act of 1872.

Appeal dismissed.