Court Opinion

ID: 9831250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:58:12.080701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:33.222089
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Considering appellant’s motion for additional findings, we overrule same for the reasons: (1) That he does not specify any particular matter upon which this court should make such additional findings; and (2) this court has, in its opinion on .the original hearing, made and found such conclusions of law and fact upon every material point assigned as error in this court.
The motion for rehearing being without merit, is overruled. Appellant’s statement that this court erred in the statement that Mrs. Canode went to see the property in controversy about 8 or 9 o’clock in the morning is not borne out by the record. Hal-brook so testified, and other portions of the record bear evidence that his statements were true.
We therefore refuse to change our finding upon this point. Both motions are overruled.