Court Opinion

ID: 9352103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-04 21:09:14.055084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:54.161030
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                              WESTERN DISTRICT

BEVERLY FERRARO,                               : No. 170 WAL 2022
                                               :
                    Respondent                 :
                                               : Petition for Allowance of Appeal
                                               : from the Order of the Superior Court
              v.                               :
                                               :
                                               :
PATTERSON-ERIE CORPORATION D/B/A               :
BURGER KING AND BURGER KING                    :
CORPORATION,                                   :
                                               :
                    Petitioner                 :

                                       ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

      Whether the Superior Court’s conclusion that [Respondent] was excused
      from compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure to serve [Petitioner]
      timely and via the Sheriff before the statute of limitations expired was in
      conflict with this Honorable Court’s holdings on the same legal question and
      other holdings of the intermediate appellate courts?