Court Opinion

ID: 4328482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-07 16:00:37.141597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:04.954355
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

ASHOK KUMAR, NELLITHANATH THANKACHEN
                BYJU,
               Appellants

                           v.

    ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF
  COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
   AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
     PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
                  Intervenor
            ______________________

                      2017-1825
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,029.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    BARRY EASTBURN BRETSCHNEIDER, Baker & Hostetler
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also repre-
sented by CHARLES C. CARSON; PETER JAMES KNUDSEN,
Seattle, WA.

     SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W.
KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
             AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

   November 7, 2018              /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
        Date                     Peter R. Marksteiner
                                 Clerk of Court