Court Opinion

ID: 8622838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 10:50:54.660099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:34.093812
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Edgar Roman-Rodriguez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine and illegal re-entry, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roman-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The government filed an answer to the Anders brief on April 6, 2007. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.
Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Roman-Rodriguez waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Bianco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
DISMISSED; REMANDED with instructions to correct the judgment.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.