Court Opinion

ID: 2924036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:55:11.926291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:18.211782
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-335-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________           _____________ 

IN RE NELSON B. FREIMER, M.D.

___________________________________________________________            

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and 

Motion for Temporary Stay

____________________________________________________________           

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

 Relator, Nelson B. Freimer, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and
motion for temporary stay in the above cause on May 29, 2007.  On May 30, 2007,
Michael Escamilla, M.D., real party in interest, filed a response to the motion for
temporary stay. 
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus, motion for temporary relief, and response to said motion, is of the opinion
that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, the
motion for temporary stay and petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

									PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 31st day of May, 2007.
 

 
1.   See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).