Court Opinion

ID: 5286308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 08:44:14.184003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:40.906582
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Terry D. Hardin (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his amended Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, as the record clearly refutes Movant’s claim of ineffective assistance of plea counsel.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).