Court Opinion

ID: 4356289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-05 04:07:51.417851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:46:23.948881
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-17-00596-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RAMON JOEL PENA,                                                           Appellant,

                                          v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                         Appellee.

                   On appeal from the 347th District Court
                         of Nueces County, Texas.

            SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria
                         Order Per Curiam

      Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 7, 2018. On May 14, 2018, this

Court granted appellant’s second motion for extension of time and directed appellant to

file the brief on or before June 7, 2018. Counsel failed to file a brief and on July 26,

2018, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. On December 18, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as

counsel on grounds counsel is overwhelmed with work and has been unable to complete

the brief.

       Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd).     In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue.

       Accordingly, the appeal remains abated and the trial court is directed to

determine whether appellant’s court-appointed attorney should remain as appellant's

counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial

court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s current appointed

attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If

the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email

address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be

included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to

be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or

before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

       It is so ordered.

                                                         Per Curiam

                                              2
Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
3rd day of January, 2019.

                            3