Court Opinion

ID: 9402045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-14 21:00:48.895953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:57.109308
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7281      Doc: 13         Filed: 06/13/2023      Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                                UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 21-7281

        KING GRANT-DAVIS,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        PATRICIA FELKER; MCLEOD FRAMPTON GWYNETTE, MD; P. STEVEN
        RUBLEE; THOMAS W. UHDE, MD,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
        Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (4:19-cv-03468-SAL)

        Submitted: May 19, 2023                                            Decided: June 13, 2023

        Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Russell Grainger Hines, CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP,
        Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7281      Doc: 13        Filed: 06/13/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              King Grant-Davis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation

        of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment

        on the pleadings in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Grant-Davis also appeals the district

        court’s denial of his motion for relief from the magistrate judge’s order denying Grant-

        Davis’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Grant-

        Davis v. Felker, No. 4:19-cv-03468-SAL (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2021). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2