Court Opinion

ID: 3213440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-15 15:05:17.967099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:06.028235
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 15-1135
                               Filed June 15, 2016

GERALD D. SMITH JR.,
    Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,
     Respondent-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Calhoun County, William C.

Ostlund, Judge.

      A postconviction-relief applicant appeals the district court’s summary

dismissal of his application. AFFIRMED.

      Gerald D. Smith Jr., Rockwell City, pro se.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and William A. Hill, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee State.

      Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and Bower, JJ.
                                          2

VOGEL, Presiding Judge.

       In 1998, Gerald Smith was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced

to twenty-five years in prison with a 70% mandatory minimum.1 He contends his

earned time credit, as calculated under Iowa Code section 903A.2 (2015), should

apply to reduce his 70% mandatory minimum term under section 902.12. In

granting the State’s motion for summary judgement, the district court ruled:

               The two statutes at issue in this case are Iowa Code
       sections 902.12 and 903A.2. The first statute addresses the
       minimum amount an inmate must serve in prison before they are
       eligible for parole or work release. The second section addresses
       the amount of earned time an inmate may accumulate towards
       decreasing their overall sentence. Applicant’s position is that the
       earned time should apply to the mandatory minimum in section
       902.12. This position is unsupported. These two statutes address
       different matters: the first statute addresses eligibility for parole or
       work release while the second statute addresses discharge date.
       The two code sections cannot be applied to each other; they are
       each applied to an inmate’s overall sentence. This issue has also
       been addressed in two unpublished Iowa Court of Appeals cases,
       Ross v. State, [No. 12-0589, 2014 WL 2345392, at *1] (Iowa Ct.
       App. [May 29,] 2014) and Williams v. State, [No. 06-1432, 2007 WL
1827334, at *1] ([Iowa Ct. App. June 27,] 2007). Both cases
       support the court’s conclusion that an inmate serving a category “B”
       sentence must serve seventy percent of his total sentence to be
       eligible for parole and earned time can only be applied to the total
       sentence.

       We agree with the district court’s decision and affirm its grant of summary

judgment without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(d) and (e).

       AFFIRMED.

1
  Smith was also sentenced to twenty-five years for a burglary conviction. The two,
twenty-five-year sentences were ordered to run consecutively for a total term of fifty
years. However, the 70% mandatory minimum was only applicable to the attempted
murder conviction, so it is only that conviction that is an issue in this appeal.