Court Opinion

ID: 2872016
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 04:05:53.794638+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:33.181543
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00065-CV

Josephine Douglas-Peters, Appellant

v.

James Nathaniel Peters, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 01-1528-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

D I S S E N T I N G   O P I N I O N

                        While I agree with the majority’s disposition of Douglas’s other issues and Peters’s
request for damages under Rule 45, I disagree with its disposition of Douglas’s second issue and,
accordingly, respectfully dissent from the majority’s judgment of reversal.  Given the absence of a
reporter’s record, the state of the clerk’s record, and the presumptions that operate in support of the
district court’s judgment in such circumstances, I would affirm.
 
 
                                                                        __________________________________________
                                                                        Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton
Filed:   March 2, 2006