Court Opinion

ID: 6000800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:53:44.387009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:07.101301
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered July 21, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not deprived of a fair trial as a result of being tried in absentia when he absconded before the commencement of trial (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136; People v Roe, 196 AD2d 899, 900). The court did not err in denying defense counsel’s request for a missing witness charge concerning the undercover police officer who monitored the so-called "buy-and-bust” transaction for which the defendant was arrested. The undercover officer was unavailable to testify as a result of injuries received in an unrelated "buy-and-bust” operation during which, among other injuries, his jaw was broken in three places and had to be wired *550shut (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424; People v Shaw, 160 AD2d 1032, 1033; People v Aufiero, 139 AD2d 656, 657). Furthermore, the evidence in the record supports the court’s conclusion that the testimony of the uncalled witness would have been entirely cumulative (see, People v Kitching, 78 NY2d 532, 536-537; People v Fields, 76 NY2d 761, 763; People v Vasquez, 76 NY2d 722, 724; People v Erts, 73 NY2d 872, 874).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.