Court Opinion

ID: 998133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:06:51.511538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:03.653333
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-262)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (1994).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Maxwell, No. CR-93-262

(E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2