Court Opinion

ID: 9501569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 19:28:35.643381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:39.530162
License: Public Domain

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge, with whom RADER, Chief Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge, joins, concurs in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Appellee. The petition for rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition of Appellant for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Appellant for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on November 2, 2012.