Court Opinion

ID: 6024136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:09:28.377341+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:55.504830
License: Public Domain

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered September 30, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to conduct a hearing to determine whether his cooperation had been sufficient, under the terms of the agreement, to require specific performance of the People’s promise of leniency, was not preserved for appellate review, since defendant neither requested such a hearing nor moved to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Messina, 131 AD2d 788). Were we to review this claim, we would find it to be without merit. Based on the single violation of failing to appear for a scheduled court date, the court was entitled, under the agreement, to impose an enhanced sentence (see, People v Yu, 204 AD2d 129, lv denied 84 NY2d 835). Moreover, a hearing to determine the extent of defendant’s cooperation would have served no purpose, “there being no evidence that the information he provided was of any use” (People v Ortiz, 180 AD2d 429). The defense offered no factual support for its contention that defendant’s efforts provided potentially useful investigative information (see, *168People v Anonymous, 208 AD2d 426, lv denied 84 NY2d 1008; see also, People v Anonymous, 219 AD2d 525, lv denied 87 NY2d 844). The agreement and the accompanying colloquy made defendant’s obligations clear.
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.