Court Opinion

ID: 7763704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:41:07.583583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:08.193490
License: Public Domain

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
This court, on December 7, 2001, affirmed the trial court's judgment without an opinion. The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed this court's judgment insofar as it relates to the Coleman's fraud and tort-of-outrage claims and reversed this court's judgment insofar as it relates to the Coleman's breach-of-contract and conversion claims, and the cause has been remanded. Ex parte Coleman, [Ms. 1010644, Mar. 14, 2003]861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion, that portion of the trial court's judgment relating to the Coleman's breach-of-contract and conversion claims is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.
REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.