Court Opinion

ID: 9956437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-02 13:09:04.30657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:32.087168
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                     NO. 03-24-00097-CR

                                 The State of Texas, Appellant

                                                v.

                                Kenneth Earl Norris, Appellee

            FROM THE COMAL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF COMAL COUNTY
    NO. 2022CR0317, THE HONORABLE DEBORAH WIGINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

                 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

               The State of Texas has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order

granting Kenneth Earl Norris’s motion to suppress evidence. The State timely filed a request for

the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. No findings or conclusions were

made before the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record were filed with this Court. The State has

now filed a motion to abate and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of findings of fact

and conclusions of law.

               Findings of fact and conclusions of law “ensure that reviewing courts need not

presume, assume, or guess at what historical facts a trial judge actually found when making a

ruling in a motion to suppress hearing.” State v. Mendoza, 365 S.W.3d 666, 671 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2012). Therefore, “upon the request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence,

the trial court shall state its essential findings,” i.e., “findings of fact and conclusions of law
adequate to provide an appellate court with a basis upon which to review the trial court’s

application of the law to the facts.” State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006). The findings must be “adequate and complete, covering every potentially dispositive

issue that might reasonably be said to have arisen in the course of the suppression proceedings.”

State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 676 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). When the trial court fails to make

such findings and conclusions, we are required to abate the appeal and remand the cause to the

trial court for entry of its “essential findings.” State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 677 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2011); see also Green v. State, 906 S.W.2d 937, 939–40 & n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995)

(holding that when appellate record has been filed with appellate court, “the trial court no longer

has jurisdiction to adjudicate the case” and that “[t]he proper way to revive the trial court’s

authority to take action is by abatement”).

               Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion. We abate the appeal and remand the

cause to the district court for entry of its essential findings of fact and conclusions of law. A

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed

with this Court no later than April 26, 2024.           This appeal will be reinstated once the

supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: March 27, 2024

Do Not Publish

                                                2