Court Opinion

ID: 4364641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-05 14:07:09.151284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:11.118048
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                          No. 1D18-1110
                  _____________________________

MICHAEL J. GILES,

    Petitioner,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Respondent.
                  _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.

                         February 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

     The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate
counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore, 768 So. 2d
1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits,
appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every
conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44,
57 (Fla. 2012).

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
                _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for
Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

                              2