Court Opinion

ID: 1029331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:55:38.866987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:40.668569
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-6230

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff – Appellee,

             v.

CEARFUL SPEIGHT, a/k/a June,

                  Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-RBS-7)

Submitted:    June 22, 2009                 Decided:   June 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cearful Speight, Appellant Pro Se.     Howard Jacob Zlotnick,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Cearful   Speight   appeals   the   district   court’s   order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).     We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.    See United States v. Speight, No. 2:93-

cr-00090-RBS-7 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2008).       We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                  2