Court Opinion

ID: 5348685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 06:29:46.363243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:41.702384
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The “ first,” “ third,” “ seventh ” and “ eighth ” causes of action should be dismissed because the alleged defamatory matters set forth therein are not libelous per se.
As the language of the alleged libelous matter in each of the remaining causes of action is susceptible of an innocent as well as of a disgraceful meaning, the question becomes one of fact for a jury to decide. (Demos v. N. Y. E. J. Publishing Co., 210 N. Y. 13; Briarcliff L. Hotel v. C.-S. Publishers, 260 id. 106, 118; Zbyszko v. N. Y. American, Inc., 228 App. Div. 277, 279.)
The order should be modified by dismissing the “ first,” “ third,” “ seventh ” and “ eighth ” causes of action and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley and Cohn, JJ., concur; Dore, J., dissents in part.