Court Opinion

ID: 6221341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-14 14:02:07.521867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:57:21.655279
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 20-1076V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

 SUSAN SULLIVAN,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                         Filed: January 12, 2022
 v.
                                                            Special Processing Unit (SPU);
 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                    Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
 HUMAN SERVICES,                                            Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                            Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                       Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                   RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

        On August 27, 2020, Susan Sullivan filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on
October 9, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges she suffered the residual effects
of her injury for at least six months. Petition at ¶ 31. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

       On January 11, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
1. Specifically, Respondent states that “Petitioner had no pre-vaccination history of pain,

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder pain; pain occurred within 48 hours after
receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain and reduced range of motion were limited to
the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and, no other condition or
abnormality, such as brachial neuritis, has been identified to explain Petitioner’s shoulder
pain.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of
her injury for at least six months. Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                   s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Chief Special Master

                                             2