Court Opinion

ID: 9587872
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:27:23.130599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:56.267135
License: Public Domain

*588Brailsford, Justice
(concurring) :
I concur in the result because, in this law case, we are bound by the trial court’s findings of fact that the respective policies were intended to value and insure the separate interests of the vendor and vendees. The record shows that these findings were based upon testimony which is not included in the record by transcript or summary. Nor do,es the record indicate that any objection was interposed to its admission or consideration. Therefore, we have no opportunity to review either the sufficiency or admissibility of the testimony on which the decision of the trial court rested. Finding no error of law, established by the record and properly preserved for review here, our appellate jurisdiction is exhausted. If I were at liberty to decide the issue upon a construction of the written insuruments, in the light of the facts which do appear in the record, I would reach a different conclusion.