Court Opinion

ID: 6582471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:39:24.015241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:57:20.229209
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Taft, J.
The original liill in this cause seeks to charge the property of the female defendant with the payment for certain materials and labor, furnished by the orator, in the erection of a dwelling-house in Lowell, Mass. The bill alleges, that the materials and labor were procured of the orator by Elias E. Wilder, at the request of his wife, Elvira, and that the orator at the time supposed that Elias was the owner of the house, and that the original charges were made to said Elias' through the orator’s misunderstanding as to the title of the property. Upon demurrer to the origi*240nal bill, it was adjudged by this court — Gen. Term, Oct. 1881 — that upon the facts alleged the orator was not entitled to relief; but lie was allowed to amend his bill, and the cause now stands upon the report of a master, who finds that the materials and labor were purchased upon the credit of Elias, that Elvira did not pledge her credit in the matter, nor did she authorize any one to do so. The case, therefore, as made by the report, is not as strong as the one made by the original bill, and as the question made by the bill has already been adjudicated between these parties, the rule that the court will not reverse a decision made in the same cause, applies; and the result is, that the decree of the Court of Chancery is affirmed, and cause remanded, with a mandate that the bill be dismissed.