Court Opinion

ID: 995802
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:42:23.338611+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:34.046186
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-6791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

NAOMI RODRIGUEZ,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-91-70, CA-97-348)

Submitted:   July 14, 1998                 Decided:   August 6, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Naomi Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Lawrence Miller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Rodriguez, Nos. CR-91-70; CA-97-348 (E.D.

Va. May 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2