Court Opinion

ID: 2822299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-30 21:15:52.935212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:45.188929
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                        MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                              IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                              OF FLORIDA
                                              SECOND DISTRICT

C.M.,                               )
                                    )
           Appellant,               )
                                    )
v.                                  )                   Case No. 2D14-2521
                                    )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                   )
                                    )
           Appellee.                )
___________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 15, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Debra K. Behnke,
Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
and Amanda V. Isaacs, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

             In this Anders1 appeal, C.M. challenges the order finding that he

committed delinquent acts, withholding adjudication, and placing him on probation for

six months. After a thorough review of the record, we have found no harmful,

             1
                 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
reversible error and affirm. But we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's

error.

              In the original disposition, the court orally announced a six-month

probationary placement. However, the written order incorrectly states that C.M. was

placed on probation indefinitely until his nineteenth birthday. While this appeal was

pending, C.M. violated probation and the trial court placed him on probation indefinitely

until his nineteenth birthday. The public defender argued that the discrepancy between

C.M.'s orally pronounced and written dispositions was moot due to C.M.'s subsequent

probation violation. We write to explain that this issue is not moot. In the event that

C.M. is granted relief from an appeal of the violation of probation order or in

postconviction proceedings, the record should be clear that he was originally placed on

six months' probation. On remand, the trial court shall amend the order to reflect the

orally pronounced placement. See W.S.G. v. State, 32 So. 3d 725, 726 (Fla. 2d DCA

2010) ("If a discrepancy exists between the written [disposition] and the oral

pronouncement, the written [disposition] must be corrected to conform to the oral

pronouncement." (quoting Guerra v. State, 927 So. 2d 248, 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006))).

              Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener's error in judgment.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

                                            -2-