Court Opinion

ID: 4365121
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-06 19:00:55.453611+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:34.511022
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-11244   Date Filed: 02/06/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-11244
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP,
a.k.a. Godfather,
a.k.a. Sugar Bear,
                                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (February 6, 2019)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-11244    Date Filed: 02/06/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Donna Duncan, appointed counsel for Pedro Bishop in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bishop’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2