Court Opinion

ID: 591641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:01.956416
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 729
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Joseph W. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Taharga A. Shabazz, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY;  CCB Members;  George Stephens;  JamesSisk; Sandra G. Hylton;  William P. Rogers;  James E.Johnson;  David Smith; Gene Kiser;  J. R. Booker;  J. R.Mosley;  W. C. Patterson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7237.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  March 16, 1992Decided:  September 11, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CV-90-353-R)
Joseph W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Joseph W. Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Williams v. Murray, No. CV-90-353-R (W.D. Va.  Aug. 27, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED