Court Opinion

ID: 9393880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-11 16:00:39.24572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:55.963426
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1317
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                               Kenneth Williams, Jr.

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: May 8, 2023
                               Filed: May 11, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Kenneth Williams appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release and sentenced him to 11 months in prison followed by an additional 24-month

      1
       The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
term of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief
arguing that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable.

       Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence was not unreasonable, as
there is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave
significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of
judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Tumea, 810 F.3d
563, 566 (8th Cir. 2016); United States v. Charles, 531 F.3d 637, 640-41 (8th Cir.
2008).

      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
                     ______________________________

                                         -2-