Court Opinion

ID: 7555347
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:49:07.655512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:05.920630
License: Public Domain

HOUSTON, Justice,
concurring specially.
The excessiveness of the verdict was not an issue presented to this Court for review. If it had been, I would have voted to remand for reconsideration of the remittitur issue in compliance with the standards set forth in Hammond v. City of Gadsden, 493 So.2d 1374 (Ala.1986); Harmon v. Motors Insurance Corp., 493 So.2d 1370 (Ala.1986); Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Casualty Insurance Co. v. Griffin, 493 So.2d 1379 (Ala.1986) (on rehearing); Reinhardt Motors, Inc. v. Boston, [Ms. October 3,1986] (Ala.1986).