Court Opinion

ID: 9896443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-11 18:10:55.291931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:00.968136
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00375-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

ALBERT QUINTANILLA,                                                         Appellant,

                                               v.

NEZAMEDDIN MAANI,                                                             Appellee.

              On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 10
                        of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
      Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Silva and Peña
                Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

      On August 18, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On August 23, 2023, the

Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal did not comply with Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b), 9.5, 25.1(d)(2-4), 25.1(d)(8), and 25.1(e). See TEX.

R. APP. P. 9.1(b), 9.5, 25.1(d)(2–4), 25.1(d)(8), 25.1(e). On October 2, 2023, the Clerk of

the Court again informed appellant of the defects, and appellant was further advised, if
the defects were not corrected within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. See id.

R. 42.3(b), (c).

       Appellant has failed to correct the defects in his notice of appeal and has otherwise

not responded to the notices from the Clerk of the Court requiring a response or other

action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                               L. ARON PEÑA JR.
                                                               Justice

Delivered and filed on the
9th day of November, 2023.

                                             2