Court Opinion

ID: 8405232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-25 18:00:28.593673+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:50.148426
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-20594     Document: 00516520102         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/25/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  No. 21-20594                        October 25, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Wesley Connell,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:21-CR-56-1

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wesley Connell
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Connell has filed a response.

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-20594    Document: 00516520102          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/25/2022

                                  No. 21-20594

   We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein, as well as Connell’s response. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2