Court Opinion

ID: 9731550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 15:49:34.020816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:19.526832
License: Public Domain

*150HENDERSON, Justice
(specially concurring).
Appellant has no legitimate appeal. Theoretically, he is entitled to reclaim his property under the contract via strict foreclosure or payment under the contract. Per oral argument, it developed that appellant continued to receive all payments, with the possible exception of two, which were missing or unaccounted for. It appears appellant desires the fruits of the contract and also the property back. This cannot be. He cannot have both. Obviously, the conveyance has not obstructed or prejudiced his rights. See 37 C.J.S. Fraudulent Conveyances § 61 (1943).