Court Opinion

ID: 8433967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 10:03:40.69004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:40.423056
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Gilberto Cardenas-Espinoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for illegal re-entry after *215deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Cardenas-Espinoza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Cardenas-Espinoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.