Court Opinion

ID: 2675631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-05-23 21:00:27.653268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:24.559847
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           MAY 23 2014

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10348

                Plaintiff - Appellee,            D.C. No. 4:13-cr-50017-RCC

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
RUBI FRANCIS CARDONA,

                Defendant - Appellant.

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                              for the District of Arizona
                      James G. Carr, District Judge, Presiding**

                              Submitted May 13, 2014***

Before:         CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

       Rubi Francis Cardona appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release and four-month sentence imposed

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
            The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge for
the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
          ***
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Cardona’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cardona

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                    13-10348