Court Opinion

ID: 8097521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:21:15.902148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:34.982535
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Johnson, J.
It was originally stipulated that certain items of cheese marked “A” on the invoice consist of Romano cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706). It was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. Inasmuch as no Romano cheese appeared under the items marked “A,” the court, in deciding the case, disregarded the trade agreement with Argentina, supra, relative to such cheese. A motion for rehearing was granted, and at the trial it was further stipulated that the cheese described on the invoice as Sardo type cheese consists of Romano cheese which was entered for consumption subsequent to the effective date of T. D. 50504. In accordance with stipulations of counsel it was held: (1) That in determining the duty applicable to the items of cheese marked “A” an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings od the outside of the cheese; and (2) that the item of merchandise invoiced as Sardo cheese consists of Romano cheese and, as such, is properly dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 710, as modified by T. D. 50504, less such allowance for tare as is applicable to the items marked “A” on the invoice.