Court Opinion

ID: 7152209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:01:54.250131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:09.732485
License: Public Domain

Opinion op the Oourt by
Judge Robertson:
The imputed fraud in obtaining the original judgment subjecting the land to sale is not sufficiently established. But the last decree for costs, damages and sale, now under revision, must be reversed on the following grounds:
1. The title to the credits, permitted in the first and allowed in the last decree, sustained the petition for a rehearing, and the injunction also, until those credits had been adjudged and, ordered by the court.

Wan'd, Lindsey, for appellants.

Trimble, for appellees.

This entitled the appellants to costs, on this supplemental proceeding, and consequently the judgment subjecting them to the costs was erroneous, and the decree for damages was improvident and unreasonably stringent.
2. The sale, as reported under the first decree for sale, might embarrass the sale last ordered, reduce the proceeds of it, and result in ulterior litigation. The circuit court ought therefore to have adjusted all questions as to the reported sale before ordering another sale.
"Wherefore the judgment now appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded for a decree in favor of the appellants for costs, and either a confirmation or vacation of the reported sale as may, by further proceedings, be found to be right, and then for a final decree accordingly.