Court Opinion

ID: 4620228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-21 02:42:14.17281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:55:47.518750
License: Public Domain

James M. Osborn and Marie-Louise Osborn, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentOsborn v. CommissionerDocket No. 1721United States Tax Court3 T.C. 603; 1944 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 148; April 11, 1944, Promulgated *148 Decision will be entered under Rule 50.  Amounts paid by a scholar for research assistance in his work on three publications, from none of which he expects to derive profit, the purpose of his work and expense being to increase his prestige and to improve his reputation for scholarship and learning and thus attract opportunities of positions in the field of education, held, not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on a trade or business.  James W. Cooper, Esq., for the petitioner.James T. Haslam, Esq., for the respondent.  Sternhagen, Judge.  STERNHAGEN *603  A deficiency of $ 355.09 in 1940 income taxes was determined by the Commissioner.  The disallowance of a deduction of $ 7,105.29, research expenses, is the only adjustment assailed.FINDINGS OF FACT.The taxpayer and his wife lived in New Haven, Connecticut, and filed a joint return in the collection district of Connecticut.  The deficiency here is determined in respect of the wife, only because the return is a joint return.Osborn, a graduate of Wesleyan University, 1928, Master of Arts, Columbia, 1934, Bachelor of Literature, Oxford, 1937, is, and was in 1940, on the Yale faculty as*149  an associate professor, and is engaged in literary research.  He receives no compensation from the university.  He gave a series of lectures at Wesleyan University, for which he *604  received $ 450.  His principal occupation was scholarly research in respect of the preparation of three works: "Work in Progress in the Modern Humanities," "Dryden, Facts and Problems," and "Subject Index of British Periodicals Before 1802." This took most of his time in 1940.  Of these, the first was an annual index or bibliography which was distributed without cost to the members of an organization.  The second was a book published by the Columbia University Press in 1941, of which 500 copies were printed at a cost to Osborn of $ 760, and from which he did not expect a profit, and the third has not yet been printed, but Osborn expects that ultimately it may be profitable. In connection with this occupation he paid expenses for services of research and clerical assistants, stationery, index cards, printing, and similar items, amounting in 1940 in the aggregate to $ 6,661.17, as conceded by the Commissioner.  Osborn's purpose in doing this work and in undertaking these expenses was to make himself*150  eligible for a highly remunerative professional appointment, such as a college president, and to receive income from the publications over a period of future years.  His work has resulted in inquiries for his availability for highly paid jobs.  His motives in writing the books have been "by doing work of first class calibre, to gain the reputation of being a first class scholar, so that I shall be eligible for first class appointments, -- a highly remunerative appointment, -- as well as prestige." He did other work on scholarly papers, books, and pamphlets, on all of which he employed assistants.OPINION.The taxpayer, a research professor at Yale, claims the right to deduct expenses paid by him for services incident to the preparation and publication of scholarly and literary matter from which he did not, and did not expect to, derive a direct or immediate profit, but which he hoped and expected would be a means of demonstrating his ability and attainments to persons in the fields of learning and education and would thus bring him a lucrative position, perhaps as a college president. The statutory provision upon which the claimed deduction is based is section 23 (a) (1) (A), Internal*151  Revenue Code, 1 which requires the allowance of deductions of expenses paid in carrying on a trade or business.*605  The evidence, consisting entirely of the testimony of the taxpayer himself, shows that he was not engaged in the business *152  of writing or preparing books primarily for profit.  His work on the books was his principal occupation. As a member of the Yale faculty, he received no compensation.  Apparently his entire interest was not in current gain or present livelihood from his efforts, but in laying a foundation for the future.  His position was similar to that of any student preparing and training himself for a profession or lifework; he builds a foundation of learning upon which his future living and earnings are to be based.  The expenses incurred in preparing himself are in essence the cost of the capital structure from which his future income is to be derived.  They are not ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on a trade or business.  This is not to say that they do not deserve recognition and respect -- that they are not "well and wisely spent" -- Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111">290 U.S. 111, but only that they can not be given deductibility for tax purposes in the absence of legislation, where alone deductibility can be provided.The Doggett case (65 Fed. (2d) 191) is different.  The taxpayer was engaged in selling the books which he was*153  producing. No matter that his principal purpose in disseminating them was to spread their doctrine; his expenses and losses were directly connected with producing and disposing of the books, and this the court held was his business, even though it was not immediately profitable. Here the taxpayer is not incurring the expenses in the course of a business of selling the books, or of building up a business of selling the books for profit, but in the course of preparing books to demonstrate his scholastic attainments, which were to be the subject of his future exploitation.  This expense is not an ordinary and necessary expense of carrying on a trade or business, and therefore it can not be deducted.Decision will be entered under Rule 50.  Footnotes1. SEC. 23. DEDUCTIONS FROM GROSS INCOME.In computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions:(a) Expenses.  --(1) Trade or business expenses.  --(A) In General.  -- All the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actully rendered; traveling expenses (including the entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the pursuit of a trade or business; and rentals or other payments required to be made as a condition to the continued use or possession, for purposes of the trade or business, of property to which the taxpayer has not taken or is not taking title or in which he has no equity.↩