Court Opinion

ID: 8674819
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:31:21.033577+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:23.925013
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Murphy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for resen-tencing for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murphy, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-17 (E.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.