Court Opinion

ID: 4379482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-21 15:34:09.770517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:21.604044
License: Public Domain

People v Rodriguez (2019 NY Slip Op 02160)

People v Rodriguez

2019 NY Slip Op 02160

Decided on March 21, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 21, 2019

Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Webber, Kern, JJ.

8758 701/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vGloria Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered June 13, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 21, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.