Court Opinion

ID: 9370458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-13 19:01:03.187108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.707684
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10533         Document: 00516643354             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/13/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10533
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                              February 13, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ruben Lee Trevino,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 1:21-CR-46-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Lee Trevino has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Trevino has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
   developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Trevino’s claims of

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10533     Document: 00516643354           Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/13/2023

                                    No. 22-10533

   ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
   without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
   829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Trevino’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2