Court Opinion

ID: 5319009
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 04:23:26.295937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:18.711810
License: Public Domain

Order denying motion for a preference affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order denying examination before trial affirmed without prejudice to a renewal upon a notice specifying that the defendant be examined as to any representations or promises made in connection with the contract of sale of the property; that the indebtedness of defendant or the said copartnership was canceled by plaintiff and so regarded by defendant at the time of the transaction referred to; that no deed has been delivered to plaintiff and the reasons therefor; the solvency of the defendant’s firm during February, 1927, and for several months thereafter; and the improvements made to the property by the plaintiff to the knowledge or with the consent of the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.