Court Opinion

ID: 4111799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-28 20:10:35.639012+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:09.050603
License: Public Domain

People v Oneal (2016 NY Slip Op 08886)

People v Oneal

2016 NY Slip Op 08886

Decided on December 28, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 28, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2015-11527
 (Ind. No. 4404/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vAndre Oneal, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Lori Glachman of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed October 29, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257; People v Bynum, 142 AD3d 1183; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, DICKERSON, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court