Court Opinion

ID: 2894505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 23:01:47.891157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:06.547411
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-04-0438-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 31, 2006

______________________________

BRENT LEE CROCKETT, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 84
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

NO. 8792; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss his appeal.   It is signed by appellant.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Also pending is the motion to withdraw filed by Donald F. Schofield, appellant’s appointed counsel, which motion accompanied counsel’s 
Anders
(footnote: 1) brief.  The appeal having been dismissed, we dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.  

James T. Campbell

        Justice

Do not publish.

FOOTNOTES
1: 
Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).