Court Opinion

ID: 992735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:56:54.05888+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:31.803436
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-6248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTHONY S.O. BETTS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-22, CA-97-65-AM)

Submitted:   July 24, 1997                 Decided:   August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S.O. Betts, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Betts, Nos. CR-92-22; CA-97-65-AM (E.D. Va.
Jan. 28, 1997). We find that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2