Court Opinion

ID: 3901770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:31:50.924476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:21.343801
License: Public Domain

Appellee, for herself and as next friend for her four minor children, brought this suit against appellant to recover damages for the negligent killing of J. B. Gullett, husband and father, by running an engine and cars over him. A recovery was had for $1,990, and the railway company appeals.
Only one issue is presented, that of discovered peril. The appellant contends that the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The evidence shows that Gullett was lying on the appellant's track at night, when he was run over and killed by one of appellant's trains. He was lying near a crossing in the town of Grand Saline, and at a point where it was frequently and habitually used by the public as a pathway for travel for a long time prior to the killing, which was known to appellant. At this point the track was straight for about one mile, and there was nothing to obstruct the view of the engineer and fireman. They saw Gullett on the track and his danger in sufficient time, by the use of the means at hand, to have prevented the injury to Gullett; but they carelessly failed to use said means to stop the train.
The judgment is affirmed. *Page 278