Court Opinion

ID: 4103725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-01 16:11:43.357272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:40.448892
License: Public Domain

State of New York
                   Supreme Court, Appellate Division
                       Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: December 1, 2016                   D-69-16
___________________________________

In the Matter of ERIC B.
   BAILEY, an Attorney.                     MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
                                                  ON MOTION
(Attorney Registration No. 4409462)
___________________________________

Calendar Date:   October 11, 2016

Before:   McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

                             __________

      Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third
Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for
Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

                             __________

Per Curiam.

      Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2006.
He was also admitted in New Jersey that same year, where he
maintains an office for the practice of law.1

      By order entered January 27, 2016, respondent was
reprimanded by the Supreme Court of New Jersey based upon
findings that he failed to diligently represent a client, failed
to properly communicate with a client and failed to cooperate
with disciplinary authorities, all in violation of three rules of
New Jersey's Rules of Professional Conduct (Matter of Bailey, 224
NJ 100 [2016]). Respondent failed to file a copy of the order of

     1
        Although it appears that respondent is currently listed,
by consent, under "disability inactive status" in New Jersey
(Matter of Bailey, 223 NJ 357 [2015]), no further information
regarding that status has been provided to this Court.
                              -2-                D-69-16

the Supreme Court of New Jersey with this Court within 30 days as
required by Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22
NYCRR) former § 806.19 (b) (see Uniform Rules for Attorney
Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.13 [d]).

      Now, by reason of the discipline imposed upon respondent in
New Jersey, the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third
Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) moves, by order to show
cause returnable October 11, 2016, to impose discipline upon
respondent in this state. Respondent has not replied or
otherwise responded to AGC's motion or raised any of the
available defenses (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary
Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.13 [b]); therefore, we grant the motion
(see Matter of Halbfish, 78 AD3d 1320, 1321 [2010]).

      Turning to the issue of an appropriate disciplinary
sanction, we take note of respondent's failure to file a copy of
the New Jersey disciplinary order with this Court (see Uniform
Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.13
[d]), his failure to respond to the subject motion and the
findings of the Supreme Court of New Jersey regarding his failure
to cooperate with disciplinary authorities in the underlying
matter. Accordingly, upon consideration of all the facts and
circumstances, we conclude that, under the circumstances
presented and in order to protect the public, maintain the honor
and integrity of the profession and deter others from committing
similar misconduct, respondent should be suspended from the
practice of law for a period of 30 days in this state (see Matter
of Cooper, 124 AD3d 1203, 1204 [2015]; Matter of Kain, 64 AD3d
992, 992-993 [2009]; see generally Uniform Rules for Attorney
Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.8 [b] [2]). Finally, we
hold that any future application for reinstatement by respondent
must include proof that he has been restored to active status to
practice law in New Jersey (see New Jersey Court Rules R
1:20-12).

      McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.,
concur.
                              -3-                  D-69-16

      ORDERED that the motion of the Attorney Grievance Committee
for the Third Judicial Department is granted; and it is further

      ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of
law for a period of 30 days, effective immediately, and until
further order of this Court (see generally Uniform Rules for
Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16); and it is
further

      ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is
commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any
form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of
another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an
attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice,
board, commission or other public authority, or to give to
another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any
advice in relation thereto; and it is further

      ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of
the Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters regulating
the conduct of suspended attorneys (see Uniform Rules for
Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.15).

                             ENTER:

                             Robert D. Mayberger
                             Clerk of the Court