Court Opinion

ID: 4435578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-03 19:00:31.447456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:06.903604
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-14286   Date Filed: 09/03/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-14286
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-00072-CG-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff - Appellee,

                                   versus

IRIS AZUCENA GARCIA,

                                                       Defendant - Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Alabama
                      ________________________

                            (September 3, 2019)

Before BRANCH, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-14286    Date Filed: 09/03/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      William Bradford, appointed counsel for Iris Garcia in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Garcia’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2