Court Opinion

ID: 9831533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:10:08.40115+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:35.600079
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
This cause was presented by appellants, as well as appellees, without questioning the fact that the last bond covered the road .bond funds as well as the other funds belonging to appellee, but through some misconception upon the part of the -writer of the original opinion it is stated in that opinion that tlie third bond did not include the road bond fund. This was a mistake, and that finding will be eliminated from the opinion, and we hold that it included the road bond fund as well as the others. It is not contested through any assignment of error that the appellants were not liable for the road borid funds on the last bond. We hold them liable.
The motion for rehearing, is overruled.