Court Opinion

ID: 2271719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:56:48.099486+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:29.565905
License: Public Domain

334 S.W.3d 903 (2011)
Edward T. DUNN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94478.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
February 15, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 2011.
Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Edward T. Dunn appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15[1] motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2010).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.