Court Opinion

ID: 2122060
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:23:01.711342+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:27.725593
License: Public Domain

787 N.W.2d 575 (2010)
Pamela A. WOLF, Respondent,
v.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Companies, Relators.
No. A10-809.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 26, 2010.
Gary L. Manka, Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.
Mary E. Kohl, Stacey A. Molde, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Alan C. Page
Associate Justice