Court Opinion

ID: 998497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:11:55.000035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:22.405030
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-6216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONALD S. TILLMAN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-89-6)

Submitted:   April 15, 1999                 Decided:   April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald S. Tillman, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald S. Tillman appeals the district court’s order denying

his “Motion for Correction Sentence.”   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Tillman, No. CR-89-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 1990).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2