Court Opinion

ID: 8438173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:36:21.974183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.911774
License: Public Domain

*268Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2009). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.