Court Opinion

ID: 857246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-04-04 18:41:58.423774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:15.781637
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-7039    Document: 33     Page: 1    Filed: 04/04/2013

           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                __________________________

                   ANTHONY G. HUNT,
                    Claimant-Appellant,

                             v.
  ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
                   AFFAIRS,
               Respondent-Appellee.
                __________________________

                        2012-7039
                __________________________

    Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
 Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4707, Judge Lawrence B.
 Hagel.
               __________________________

                      ON MOTION
                __________________________

                         ORDER

     Anthony G. Hunt moves to supplement his brief with
 further points and authorities, which he also refers to as a
 motion for mandamus.
Case: 12-7039         Document: 33   Page: 2   Filed: 04/04/2013

 HUNT   v. SHINSEKI                                          2

      Mr. Hunt’s motion provides additional arguments re-
 garding the merits of his case. We deem it the best course
 to treat his motion as a supplement to his brief.

       Upon consideration thereof,

       IT IS ORDERED THAT:

     The motion to supplement his brief is granted. A copy
 of Mr. Hunt’s supplemental brief will be transmitted to
 the merits panel assigned to hear this case.

                                       FOR THE COURT
                                        /s/ Jan Horbaly
                                       Jan Horbaly
                                       Clerk

 s24