Court Opinion

ID: 733545
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 17:07:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:29.791651
License: Public Domain

105 F.3d 647
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Warren L. HOLDERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL;  Mark Hughes, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 96-6636.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 1996.Decided Dec. 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.  James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-93-592-6)
Warren L. Holderman, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Norwood League, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief in part on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214.   We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal;  to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate.  We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Holderman v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-93-592-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 1996).  We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED