Court Opinion

ID: 4079435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-04 18:01:05.816076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:29.297021
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-40162      Document: 00513704001         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/04/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-40162
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        October 4, 2016
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

JAVIER DOMINGUEZ-AGUIRRE,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:15-CR-982-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Dominguez-

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40162   Document: 00513704001    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/04/2016

                               No. 16-40162

Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dominguez-Aguirre has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2