Court Opinion

ID: 9941193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 01:01:27.413164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:20.828156
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10968         Document: 00517065363             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/15/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 23-10968
                                                                                         FILED
                                                                                  February 15, 2024
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                           Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Joseph Ray Luedtke,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 7:23-CR-7-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Clement, Elrod, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Ray Luedtke has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Luedtke has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10968     Document: 00517065363          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/15/2024

                                   No. 23-10968

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2