Court Opinion

ID: 1003348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:24:58.587893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:15.176796
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6901

JOHNATHAN M. GILMORE,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT        OF   CORRECTION;
MICHAEL T. W. BELL,

                                             Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-99-434-5-H)

Submitted:   December 20, 2000              Decided:   January 8, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnathan M. Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Johnathan M. Gilmore seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.     Gilmore v. North Carolina

Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-99-434-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2000).      We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2