Court Opinion

ID: 9395439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-17 21:00:57.100713+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:08.318512
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7033      Doc: 16         Filed: 05/16/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7033

        MATTHEW L. THACKER,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

              v.

        MICHAEL BRECKON, Warden, Sued individually and in his Official Capacity;
        HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Sued
        Individually and in his Official Capacity; D. D. HICKS, Chief of Housing and
        Programs Sued in his Individual and Official Capacities; N. EDMONDS,
        Captain/Correctional Officer, Sued Individually and in his Official Capacity,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00609-LO-WEF)

        Submitted: April 27, 2023                                         Decided: May 16, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Matthew L. Thacker, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory S. Bean, Michael Gordon Matheson,
        GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7033      Doc: 16         Filed: 05/16/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Matthew L. Thacker appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions

        for summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissing Thacker’s

        claims for injunctive relief as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

        error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thacker v.

        Breckon, No. 1:20-cv-00609-LO-WEF (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2022). We grant the motion for

        leave to file supplemental informal opening brief and dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2