Court Opinion

ID: 995763
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:41:41.044326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:00.724438
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT L. PEELER, SR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-93-165, CA-98-218-8)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                   Decided:   July 2, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Peeler, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert L. Peeler, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Peeler, Nos. CR-93-165; CA-

98-218-8 (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2