Court Opinion

ID: 9918514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-14 08:12:44.428416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:38.808070
License: Public Domain

Appellant’s motion granted, appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed
January 11, 2024.

                                       In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-23-00815-CV

                    EBENEZER LARBI AKITA, Appellant

                                         V.

 PAYPAL, TETEE BENDU ROGERS, AND HUSAIN ANDREW ROGERS,
                        Appellees

             On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1
                           Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 1196819

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This appeal is from an interlocutory order signed October 9, 2023 denying a
motion to reconsider or strike an order compelling arbitration. On December 14,
2023, appellant filed a motion for non-suit, which we construe to be a motion for
voluntary dismissal of the appeal, see Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), asking for this appeal
to be resolved “without prejudice.” The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak
only of dismissal of an appeal; neither “with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is
appended to the word “dismissal.” See id. As previously mentioned, we construe
the motion as one for voluntary dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
42.1(a)(1). So construed, the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.

                                         2