Court Opinion

ID: 9547701
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:50:37.7104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:17:57.867449
License: Public Domain

CONNOR, Justice,
dissenting.
It is obvious that the superior court was confronted with a difficult problem in determining the custody question in this case. *609Louise’s psychiatric problems appear to be one of the main factors, among many, which led the court to its conclusion that custody should be awarded to Jose. The court provided for periodic investigations to be made as to the care that Nicholas would receive while in the custody of the father, and while in visitation status with the mother. Thus a means was provided whereby the custody determination could be reassessed as future needs became apparent.
From my reading of the record I am unable to conclude that in balancing a number of factors the superior court committed an abuse of discretion. Therefore, I would affirm.