Court Opinion

ID: 1001954
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:03:15.800153+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:53.547373
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6591

RICARDO ANDERSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE; FRANK RAWLINGS,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-215-7)

Submitted:   June 15, 2000                  Decided:   June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ricardo Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his civil action, which the district court properly

construed as a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Anderson v. Angelone, No. CA-00-215-7

(W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2