Court Opinion

ID: 9828758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:42:57.362184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:52.850256
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
The appellant complains of our finding:
“That the train on which appellees were traveling reached Sweetwater at 8:12 o’clock at night and left at 10:30, which finding of fact clearly is an oversight of the court.”
This statement was made by the court as claimed; still we do not think it in any way affects the decision of the case. While there was little divergence of opinion in the statement of some of the witnesses as to when the said train did actually arrive, we think there was sufficient evidence to show that during the time appellee Shaw remained in the depot at Sweetwater he caught cold, and that there was not any fire lighted therein for at least an hour before the departure of his train, from which exposure his sickness resulted.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.