Court Opinion

ID: 4197773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-08-22 07:05:35.650672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:36.883341
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 August 10, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0015. JACKIE WHORTON v. THE STATE.

      In 2006, a jury found Jackie Whorton guilty of two counts of aggravated child
molestation and numerous other related offenses. The trial court imposed a total
sentence of 75 years’ imprisonment. We affirmed Whorton’s judgment of conviction
on direct appeal. Whorton v. State, 318 Ga. App. 885 (735 SE2d 7) (2012).
      In August 2016, Whorton filed a motion to correct and/or vacate an illegally
imposed void sentence, which the trial court denied in an order entered on September
26, 2016. Whorton filed a notice of appeal on June 14, 2017.1 We lack jurisdiction
for two reasons.
      First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order
sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice
of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.
State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Whorton filed his notice
of appeal 261 days after entry of the trial court’s order, his appeal is untimely.
      Second, a direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or
correct a void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence
is, in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009);
Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a
void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and
validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not

      1
         Whorton’s notice of appeal is dated October 3, 2016, but was not filed in the
trial court until June 14, 2017.
authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment
for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,
572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). When a sentence is within the statutory range of
punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      Whorton argues in his motion to correct and/or vacate an illegally imposed
void sentence that: (i) the trial court failed to exercise its discretion to impose
sentences below the statutory maximums; (ii) the trial court was required to impose
split sentences for one or more of his convictions under OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b);
(iii) the trial court failed to exercise its discretion under § 17-10-6.2 (c) to impose
sentences below the mandatory minimums; (iv) the trial court’s failure to merge
several of his convictions violates the prohibition against double jeopardy; and (v) his
sentences subject him to cruel and unusual punishment. In the first, third, fourth and
fifth of these contentions, Whorton does not claim that his sentences fell outside the
statutory range of punishments.2 As to his second claim, although a sentence that
does not comply with § 17-10-6.2 is void, New v. State, 327 Ga. App. 87, 106-109 (5)
(755 SE2d 568) (2014), that statute does not apply here because it had not yet been
enacted when, between 2002 and 2004, Whorton committed the charged offenses.
See Ga. L. 2006, pp. 379, 395, 413, §§ 21, 30 (a); Searcy v. State, 162 Ga. App. 695,
698 (2) (291 SE2d 557) (1982) (this Court applies the sentencing law in effect at the
time the crime was committed); accord Richardson v. State, 334 Ga. App. 344, 346-
347 (1) (779 SE2d 406) (2015).
      Because Whorton has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack
jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2). To the extent
that Whorton’s motion could be construed as seeking to vacate or modify his
convictions, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an

      2
        Moreover, Whorton’s fourth contention – his merger claim – is a challenge
to his convictions, and not his sentences, and therefore does not state a valid void-
sentence claim. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 193-194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010).

                                           2
appropriate remedy in a criminal case,” id. at 218 (1), and any appeal from an order
denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id. at 218 (2); see also
Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010).
      For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                             Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                       08/10/2017
                                             I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                      the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                             Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                      hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                      , Clerk.

                                         3