Court Opinion

ID: 8452070
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:53:13.770673+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.568707
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Eugene Brinkley appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brinkley v. United States, No. 5:10-ct-03084-B O (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2011) & 2012 WL 78376 (Jan. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.