Court Opinion

ID: 9674334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:26:54.775197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:27.021158
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
In its application for rehearing appellant says that this court failed to consider and dispose of assignments of error four, seven, fifteen and sixteen.
The court did consider these four assignments but did not write to them for the reason that the argument made in support of them did not comply with Supreme Court Rule 9. Gorum v. Mott, 33 Ala.App. 525, 35 So.2d 381.
The Supreme Court has said that mere insistence of error without mention of authority does not amount to an argument. Alabama Elec. Co-operative v. Partridge, 284 Ala. 442, 225 So.2d 848. And, this court, in conformity with the holdings of the Supreme Court, has enforced Rule 9 in this regard. Grant v. Grant, 1973, 49 Ala.App. 559, 274 So.2d 329.
Opinion extended.
Application for rehearing overruled.
WRIGHT, P. J., and HOLMES, J., concur.