Court Opinion

ID: 995207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:34:07.95948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:53.615848
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT PETER RUSSELL,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-91-56-A)

Submitted:   May 28, 1998                  Decided:   June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Peter Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert Peter Russell appeals the district court's order deny-

ing his cross-motion for relief from judgment and granting the

Government's motion to set aside the order to preserve evidence. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Russell, No. CR-91-56-A (E.D. Va.
Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2