Court Opinion

ID: 5757055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:08:10.425636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:26.776564
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Holdman, J.), rendered November 3, 2006, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly granted the People’s request for a missing witness charge with respect to the defendant’s mother since, according to the defendant’s own testimony, she was sufficiently knowledgeable about his whereabouts at the time of the crime as to make her testimony material to his defense and not cumulative (see People v Torres, 255 AD2d 129 [1998]; People v Smith, 240 AD2d 600, 601 [1997]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Fisher, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Carni, JJ., concur.