Court Opinion

ID: 8986128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 11:46:06.133416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:10:47.345939
License: Public Domain

C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 431 F. 2d 655;
Ct. App. D. C. Reported below: 277 A. 2d 477;
C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 445 F. 2d 945;
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 455 F. 2d 899; and
C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 475 F. 2d 1393. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; *914Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Me. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari and reverse the judgments. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37.