Court Opinion

ID: 5121191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-26 17:09:33.374891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:43.392358
License: Public Domain

People v Muniz (2021 NY Slip Op 05824)

People v Muniz

2021 NY Slip Op 05824

Decided on October 26, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 26, 2021

Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ. 

Ind. No. 5337/16 Appeal No. 14475 Case No. 2020-04818 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vCarlos Muniz, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Elizabeth T. Schmidt of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered March 04, 2019,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 26, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.