Court Opinion

ID: 3123288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:37:31.195986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:55.074538
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00252-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
 
JEREMY
SCHLOSSER,                                                                Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
THE
STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
 
                            On
Appeal from the 94th District Court
                                       of
Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                                       MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                  Before
Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela
                               Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Jeremy Schlosser, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss
his appeal because he was granted a new trial on punishment and no longer
wishes to appeal.  See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.2(a).  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant
the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and
dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no
motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
 
PER
CURIAM
Do not
publish.  See Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).  
Delivered and filed the
5th day of August, 2010.