Court Opinion

ID: 4102718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-29 01:01:08.938694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:36:34.709527
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-20737      Document: 00513774286         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/28/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 15-20737
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        November 28, 2016
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                         Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ALBERTO MONTERROZA-CALDERON, also known as Miguel
Alberto Monterosa, also known as Miguel Alberto Monteroza Calderon, also
known as Miguel Monterroza Calderon,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:15-CR-438-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Alberto
Monterroza-Calderon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).           Monterroza-Calderon has filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-20737    Document: 00513774286    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/28/2016

                                No. 15-20737

record referenced therein, as well as Monterroza-Calderon’s response. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2