Court Opinion

ID: 1019653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:38:53.372791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:28:18.436023
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Chander Kant and Ashima Kant appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their civil action and denying their Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Kant v. Bregman, Berbert, Schwartz & Gilday, LLC,
  
  No. CA-04-3433-WMN (D. Md. July 5, 2005; Nov. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.