Court Opinion

ID: 622921
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-16 14:46:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:10.083334
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-40709     Document: 00511759935         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/15/2012

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 15, 2012
                                     No. 11-40709
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID ALEJANDRO GOMEZ-RAMIREZ, true name David Alejandro Salinas-
Velasquez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:09-CR-328-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Alejandro
Gomez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez-Ramirez has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 11-40709   Document: 00511759935     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/15/2012

                                No. 11-40709

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2