Court Opinion

ID: 547889
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:07:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:48.689386
License: Public Domain

914 F.2d 247Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Edward Lee DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-6022.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 1990.Decided Sept. 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-501-N)
Edward Lee Davis, appellant pro se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Edward Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Davis v. Murray, C/A No. 89-501-N (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.