Court Opinion

ID: 3606506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:51:47.233558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:39.096596
License: Public Domain

The decree appealed from settles all the leading points in controversy between the parties, but it directs a reference for the purpose of ascertaining what real and personal estate falls within the operation of the decree; and directs the referee to take and state an account between the parties. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, the amount found due to either party is to be paid by the other, "at such time or times as shall be specified in said report;" and the sum of five thousand dollars is to be forthwith paid to the respondent, on account of the moneys which may be payable to him under the order or decree. The referee is to make his report with all convenient speed, "to the end, that on the coming in and confirmation of his report, such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just." It is also ordered, that neither party shall have costs as against the other; "and that all further directions be reserved until the coming in of the said referee's report." Although the decree is final as to several particulars, *Page 572 
it evidently is not so as to all. "Further directions" are reserved until the coming in of the report; and then "such further order and decree may be made thereon as shall be just." It will be necessary to set the cause down for a further decree on the coming in of the report. The decree already made is not final; and the appeal was premature. The point was decided inHarris v Clark at the last July term.
Motion granted.
 *Page 17