Court Opinion

ID: 8637304
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:47:23.306712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:57.873023
License: Public Domain

WAITE, Circuit Justice.
There is here no. dispute as to facts. The simple question is, whether, upon the facts as they are substantially conceded to be, a case of inevitable accident has, in law, been made out. As between the two approaching vessels, it was the duty of the Southern Home to keep out of the way, and the collision was, no doubt, due solely to the fact that she had no lookout. The burden of excusing this fault is on her.
It is said, by the supreme court, in the case of The Grace Girdler, 7 Wall. [74 U. S.] 196, 203, that “inevitable accident is where a vessel is pursuing a lawful avocation in a lawful manner, using the proper precautions against danger, and an accident occurs. The highest degree of caution that can be used is not required. It is enough that it is reasonable, under the circumstances.” The Southern Home was pursuing a lawful avocation. She sailed from a sickly port, bound for a more healthy one, having on board what appeared to be a sufficient crew. While the steward was complaining, there was nothing in his case to indicate special danger. A vessel once out of port, with a full complement of men, is not always required to put back if sickness afterwards appears. Neither must she, under all circumstances, seek an intermediate port, for relief. All such matters are left to the considerate judgment of those in command at the time, and, if they act with reasonable prudence, in reference to the preservation of life and property, they are not to be charged with fault simply because an accident afterwards happens, that might have been avoided if another course had been pursued. In this case, the vessel was bound for a northern port, where there was every reason to believe the disease with which her crew was afflicted could be treated under more favorable circumstances than at the one she had left, or any other she could have entered on her way up. That there was no absolute necessity for putting back when the sickness broke out, is shown by the fact, that the vessel was safely navigated with her disabled crew until she had almost reached her port of destination, and that only one of her crew died on the way. All those who reached New York recovered soon after their arrival. It is not reasonable to suppose that more could have been accomplished in the way of saving life, if anything else had been done. An attempt to enter another port would have exposed the vessel to dangers similar to those she encountered while approaching New *824York. A collision with the Bremen would have been avoided, but another might have occurred. To my mind it is clear, that, under the circumstances, it was not a fault to .continue the voyage without putting back or turning aside for relief.
The whole case, as it seems to me. depends upon what occurred at or immediately before the collision. The vessel was then nearing her port of destination. The weather was fine, the sea smooth, and the wind such as to make it easy to navigate her. This is shown by the conceded fact, that the' sick man at the wheel, too weak to speak aloud and scarcely able to sit up, could keep her steady on her course. All sails were set, but they were no more than could easily be carried. All she actually needed, more than she had, was a lookout. Had there been one at his post, it is almost certain there would have been no collision. If she had anchored or hove to in that unusual place, a lookout would have been as necessary as if she had been sailing. In short, so long as she could be steered, it was nearly or quite as safe for her to go on without her lookout, as it would have been to lie still. If she had come to anchor, there was no crew to raise it. should that become necessary. But, in all cases like this, some attention must be paid to the natural instincts of mankind. The second mate, almost exhausted by his days and weeks of watching and anxiety, was where he saw relief nearly at hand. It would be inhuman to charge him with fault in keeping on instead of anchoring or heaving to, in the midst of the circumstances which then surrounded him. There was no other vessel in sight when he went below, and he left strict orders to be called if anything appeared. He was prompt to answer the call as soon as it came, and. in seeking his expected hour or two of sleep, he was but preparing himself for the more active work which would probably be required of him when he got nearer the entrance of the harbor. He displayed no signals of distress, because, until the Bremen appeared, there was no one to see them, and, when she. did appear, there was no one to make the display, any more than there was to notice her light when it was near enough to be seen. When the second mate came on deck he did everything that could be done. As soon as he found out why he was called he put the wheel to port and let go the main sheet. It was not seriously contended, on the argument here, that this was wrong, or that anything else could have avoided the collision which -was then imminent.
I am entirely satisfied with the correctness of the decree belo'w, and an entry may be prepared dismissing the libel, with costs.