Court Opinion

ID: 7215309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 00:51:15.465061+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:59.294019
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
William A. Bradshaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some claims and defendants from his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bradshaw seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.