Court Opinion

ID: 7352466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 02:50:06.539096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:27.738070
License: Public Domain

GUY, J.
This action is for the conversion of a piano. At the close of the trial the trial justice dismissed the complaint, upon the ground that there was no proof of a demand or refusal, but directed that an absolute judgment should be entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. This was error. The most that the court below could do was to dismiss the complaint without prejudice to a new action. Section 248, subd. 4, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580).
The defendant substantially concedes, and the testimony in the record tends to show, that the defendant has no title to the piano, and that he has offered to return the same to the plaintiff, but without damages for its detention or rent for its use. We think that the interests of justice require that the judgment should be modified accordingly.
Judgment modified, by awarding the possession of the piano to the plaintiff, without damages, and without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.