Court Opinion

ID: 9660116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:05:29.451328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:15.059555
License: Public Domain

LIVINGSTON, Justice,
concurring.
I jom m the result of the opmion and write separately only to respectfully disagree with the court’s application of the de novo review of a trial court’s speedy trial analysis as adopted by this court m Clarke v. State, 928 S.W.2d 709, 713 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, pet. filed) (op. on reh’g). I believe an appellate court should apply an abuse of discretion standard of review. Clarke, 928 *794S.W.2d at 723 (Livingston, J., concurring); State v. Perkins, 911 S.W.2d 548, 551 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.) (applying abuse of discretion standard), overruled by implication in Clarke, 928 S.W.2d at 713.