Court Opinion

ID: 1021972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:14:44.921694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:03.498242
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-7854

OLIVER HIGUERA-PINEDA,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:06-HC-2128-H)

Submitted: February 15, 2007              Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Oliver Higuera-Pineda, a federal prisoner,        appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000)   petition.    We   have   reviewed   the   record   and   find   no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court.    Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-HC-

2128-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2006).      We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -