Court Opinion

ID: 8609289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:43:24.564554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.216480
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rodolfo Ceniceros-Facio raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almenda*433rez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *433published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.