Court Opinion

ID: 575993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:05.454227
License: Public Domain

953 F.2d 1383
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Raymond Edward GILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-6786.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 1991.Decided Feb. 5, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge.  (CR-86-9-B, CA-3011-B)
Raymond Edward Gill, appellant pro se.
Catherine Curtis Blake, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Raymond Earl Gill appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Gill, Nos.  CR-86-9-B, CA-90-3011-B (D.Md. Feb. 20, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.