Court Opinion

ID: 991841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:42:40.422045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:32.980441
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
88-378-HM, CA-96-777-S)

Submitted:   February 13, 1997            Decided:   March 24, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim, Nos. CR-
88-378-HM; CA-96-777-S (D. Md. May 22, 1996). Appellant's motion

to remand to the district court is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2