Court Opinion

ID: 4116797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-19 02:16:59.992133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:24.883625
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-16-00366-CV

                                  COURT OF APPEALS

                      THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JAMES CASWELL AND RONALD BINKLEY,                                                          Appellants,

                                                    v.

SANTIAGO PEREZ,                                      Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 201st District Court
                    of Travis County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        Appellants, James Caswell and Ronald Binkley, perfected an appeal from a

judgment entered by the 201st District Court of Travis County, Texas, in cause number

D-1-GN-13-003065.1 The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on

        1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.).
grounds that the parties have resolved the dispute. The parties request that this Court

dismiss the appeal.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                       PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed
the 12th day of January, 2017.

                                            2