Court Opinion

ID: 3538316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:50:58.295736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:54.948629
License: Public Domain

Dear Auditor Montee:
This office received your letter of December 11, 2009, submitting a fiscal note and fiscal note summary prepared under § 116.175, RSMo, for an initiative petition submitted by Marc H. Ellinger (version 1). The fiscal note summary that you submitted is as follows:
  The proposal could eliminate certain city earnings taxes. For 2010, Kansas City and the City of St. Louis budgeted earnings tax revenue of $199.2 million and $141.2 million, respectively. Reduced earnings tax deductions could increase state revenues by $4.8 million. The total cost or savings to state and local governmental entities is unknown.
Under § 116.175, we approve the legal content and form of the fiscal note summary. Because our review of the fiscal note summary is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.
                                                         Very truly yours, _________________ Chris Koster Attorney General