Court Opinion

ID: 588437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:10:20.891562
License: Public Domain

972 F.2d 343
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Scott Lewis RENDELMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6500.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 20, 1992Decided:  August 10, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Joseph C. Howard, District Judge (CR-88-3, CA-91-2554-JH)
Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se.
Peter M. Semel, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Scott Lewis Rendelman appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Rendelman, Nos.  CR-88-3, CA-91-2554-JH (D. Md. Apr. 21, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED