Court Opinion

ID: 9800286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 08:10:53.175997+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:12.629793
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE RICE,
specially concurring.
¶25 The Court relies heavily upon Griffin v. Moseley, 2010 MT 132, 356 Mont. 393, 234 P.3d 869, a case in which I dissented. See Opinion, !¶ 18-20. Griffin is now governing authority and, further, my dissent there was concerned with the subsidiary question of whether the Plaintiffs expert witness was qualified to testify concerning a neurosurgeon’s standard of care, not the adequacy of Plaintiffs pleadings. See Griffin, ¶¶ 41-46 (J. Rice, dissenting). Therefore, I concur.