Court Opinion

ID: 855864
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-21 20:28:03.143167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:16.271470
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 21 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-50188

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:09-cr-04495-WQH

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
MARTIN SALDANA-VASQUEZ,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of California
                    William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted March 12, 2013 **

Before:        PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

       Martin Saldana-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saldana-Vasquez’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saldana-Vasquez the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     11-50188