Court Opinion

ID: 3581833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:32:52.315715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:53:53.460579
License: Public Domain

This action was brought to recover on a policy of insurance issued by the United States Industrial Company on the life of Catherine T. Beglin, and assumed by the defendant according to its terms. The policy was issued on the 10th day of April, 1897, and Catherine T. Beglin died on the 12th day of June, 1899.
The written application for insurance contained, among other questions, the following: "Has either parent or any brother or sister died of consumption or any pulmonary or constitutional disease?" To this question the applicant answered in the negative. Under the terms of the application the answers to questions were made warranties, and it is now claimed on behalf of the defendant that the answer made to that question was incorrect and that, therefore, the plaintiff cannot recover.
Upon the trial the defendant offered in evidence a certified copy of the records of the board of health of the city of Albany for the month of January, 1889, and this was followed by an offer of the original record. The receipt of these records was objected to upon the ground that they were hearsay. The objection was overruled and an exception was taken. The records were to the effect that Esther Horan, who was the mother of Catherine T. Beglin, died in the city of Albany on the 2d day of January, 1889, and that the chief cause of death was phthisis pulmonalis. This was the only testimony given as to the cause of death of the mother of the petitioner. Upon the trial the court found as a fact that the *Page 376 
mother of Catherine T. Beglin died of consumption, and that consequently her administrator could not recover upon the policy of insurance.
A question appears to have arisen in the court below as to whether the general statute relating to public health was in force in the city of Albany, or chapter 297 of the Laws of 1885, which was a local statute. We shall not stop to consider that question, but shall assume that the general statute was in force and that it required a registration of births, marriages and deaths, including the cause of death; and that this record was made prima facie evidence of the facts therein set forth. This statute was a police regulation, required for public purposes and became prima facie evidence so far as concerns questions arising under its provisions which involve public rights. But we think it was not the intention of the legislature to change the common law rule of evidence in controversies of private parties growing out of contract, and that the provisions of the statute should not be construed as applicable to such cases. This in effect was what we held in the case of Davis v. Supreme Lodge,Knights of Honor (165 N.Y. 159); also in Buffalo Loan, Trustand Safe Deposit Co. v. Knights Templar and Masonic Mutual AidAssociation (126 N.Y. 450). The question here presented was elaborately discussed in the Davis case and we regard it as controlling upon the question now presented.
It follows that the record was improperly received for the purpose of showing the cause of death, and consequently the judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the trial court should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ., concur; O'BRIEN, J., absent.
Judgment reversed, etc. *Page 377