Court Opinion

ID: 1002963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:18:54.545082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:23.958487
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7058

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DOUGLAS T. WRIGHT,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.   Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-93-356, CA-99-1442-3)

Submitted:   November 9, 2000          Decided:     November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas T. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

       Douglas T. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.     See United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-93-356;

CA-99-1442-3 (D.S.C. July 14, 2000).         We dispense with oral argu-

ment   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are   adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                      2