Court Opinion

ID: 9423034
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:05:39.142194+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:41.143009
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Harlan,
dissenting.
The Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has in effect held that the manner in which petitioners presented their motion for a change of venue violated professional standards governing members of the Virginia Bar. This Court now sets aside the trivial disciplinary penalty imposed simply because in its view petitioners' conduct was not out of bounds. Believing that any differences over the professional propriety of petitioners’ actions involve nothing of constitutional proportions, I would affirm the judgment of the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.*

1 do not think that any of the other contentions not reached by this Court can be said, on this record, to present a substantial federal question {ante, pp. 135-136, n. 2).