Court Opinion

ID: 5125279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-11-11 19:00:29.687864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:45.142690
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-50806     Document: 00516089865         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/11/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                      November 11, 2021
                                  No. 20-50806                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Eduardo Reyes-Aguilar,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                          USDC No. 3:20-CR-1422-1

   Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Reyes-
   Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Aguilar has not filed a response. We

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50806     Document: 00516089865         Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/11/2021

                                  No. 20-50806

   have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2