Court Opinion

ID: 8212288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-06 18:00:19.316242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:09.109812
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40928      Document: 00516499074         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/06/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                       October 6, 2022
                                  No. 21-40928                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Lenard Lee,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 5:20-CR-1779-1

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Lenard Lee has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lee
   has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40928    Document: 00516499074         Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/06/2022

                                 No. 21-40928

   portions of the record reflected therein.     We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2