Court Opinion

ID: 4523475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-04-08 06:10:59.409417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:10.330272
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                                         FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                                    ORDER ON MOTION

 Cause number:                     01-20-00137-CR
 Style:                            Kenneth Nester v.
                                   v. The State of Texas
                     *
 Date motion filed :               April 1, 2020
 Type of motion:                   Motion to Dismiss
 Party filing motion:              Appellant
 Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated?       No

 If motion to extend time:
          Original due date:
           Number of previous extensions granted:                        Current Due date:
           Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

           Granted
                    If document is to be filed, document due:
           The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.
          Denied
           Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
          Other: _____________________________________
            We strike appellant’s Motion to Dismiss because said motion is deficient for failing to comply with the
            Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The Court will consider a Motion to
            Dismiss that complies with the signature requirement in Rule 42.2(a). See id.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack
                         Acting individually              Acting for the Court

Panel consists of        ____________________________________________

Date: ___April 7, 2020______