Court Opinion

ID: 810036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-10-15 15:13:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:41:14.657095
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

          IN RE BARTON PATENT 533, LLC

                 ____________________

                      2012-1116
            (Re-examination No. 90/010,064)
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   KEITH J. GRADY, Polsinelli Shughart PC, of St. Louis,
Missouri, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief
were GRAHAM L. W. DAY and ROBYN H. AST.

    NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the
Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. On the brief
were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW
and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.
                  ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and MOORE,
Circuit Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 15 2012               /s/ Jan Horbaly
     Date                          Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk