Court Opinion

ID: 6515299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:26:03.579647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:00.174248
License: Public Domain

COLEMAN, J.
The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for perjury. Demurrers were filed to the first and second counts of the indictment, which were overruled, and *36the judgment of the court, overruling the demurrers, raises the only question for consideration. The grounds of demurrer are that the matters alleged to have been falsely sworn to were immaterial. The indictment shows that one Joe "Waits was on trial for the offense of selling or giving spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors to the present defendant, a minor, and the first count charges that on said trial the defendant falsely swore “that said Joe Waits did not sell or give him any whiskey, and that he had no understanding whatever with said Joe Waits where whiskey could be found by him,” and the second count charges that he falsely swore “that he did not give Joe Waits any money for whiskey.” The demurrers were properly overruled. The indictment conforms to the form given in the Criminal Code for an indictment for perjury, and accords with the rule declared in section 3908, Crim. Code. The matter falsely sworn to is distinctly stated, its materiality averred, and considered in connection with the character of the offense for which Joe Waits is on trial, the materiality of the matter is apparent.
Affirmed.