Court Opinion

ID: 9831706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:18:34.008971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:37.213655
License: Public Domain

On Motions for Rehearing.
In our original opinion in this case the judgment of the trial court was reformed so as to allow the appellant, H. Grady Cooper, to recover an undivided interest in the surface estate of the land involved, but through inadvertence the interest was set out as an undivided Vis interest when the fractional portion recovered should have been a ½0 interest. Accordingly, the opinion is corrected so as to adjudge to such appellant a recovery of an undivided ¼0 interest in the surface estate of the land described in the judgment. Also, in the motion of the appellee, E. M. Slaughter, our attention is directed to the fact that in the trial court a stipulation between the plaintiffs and E. M. Slaughter was filed in which it was stated that no recovery was sought against the said E. M. Slaughter. Therefore, it is ordered that the opinion herein show that no recovery be had against E. M. Slaughter and that he be discharged with his costs. With these corrections, the motions for rehearing in all things respectfully are overruled.