Court Opinion

ID: 4281938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-06 19:43:35.910255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:04.914504
License: Public Domain

People v Ackwood (2018 NY Slip Op 03988)

People v Ackwood

2018 NY Slip Op 03988

Decided on June 6, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 6, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-11606
 (Ind. No. 6524/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vBryan Ackwood, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Cynthia Colt of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Evelyn Laporte, J.), imposed June 29, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (cf. People v Santiago, 139 AD3d 515) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court