Court Opinion

ID: 9680858
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:39:51.404589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:30.974574
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellant continues to urge his Motion to Dismiss. He still contends the “Park Road” does not cross and does not give actual access to the Pope Ranch. He strongly urges that Jack Pope does not contend otherwise. Certainly Jack Pope recognized that without a survey the road’s exact location on the various sections could not be known. Nevertheless, Exhibit “A” does show the road crossing the Pope Ranch at one place and that is some evidence of its location. But the issue is really moot since the standing of Jack Pope as a party may not be raised for the first time on appeal.
The Appellant is correct in asserting that Tom Yarbro testified that the County put in cattle guards on the “North Road” and not the “Park Road,” and we correct our original opinion in this regard. The fact remains that the County did maintain the “Park Road.”
The Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is overruled.