Court Opinion

ID: 2881582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 15:55:36.689493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:04.423640
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-03-00081-CV
______________________________

RAY DALE HOOKS AND SHIRLEY HOOKS, Appellants

V.

THEDA FRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court
Harrison County, Texas
Trial Court No. 00-0250

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Ray Dale Hooks and Shirley Hooks, Appellants, attempt to appeal from a default judgment
signed January 8, 2003.  Appellants filed a motion for new trial on January 30, 2003, but did not file
their notice of appeal until May 9, 2003. 
	When an appellant files a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion
to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law, the notice of appeal must be filed
within ninety days after the date the judgment is signed.  See Tex R. App. P. 26.1(a).  In the present
case, the notice of appeal was due on April 9, 2003, thirty days prior to when they actually filed the
notice. 
	Further, the rule setting a longer timetable for a restricted appeal does not apply to a party
who has timely filed a postjudgment motion, as Appellants did in this case.  Tex. R. App. P. 30. 
Accordingly, the notice of appeal was required to be filed within ninety days of the date the judgment
was signed by the trial court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.
	Because the notice of appeal was not filed timely, we are without jurisdiction over this
appeal.  Id. 

	We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

							Josh R. Morriss, III
							Chief Justice

Date Submitted:	July 1, 2003
Date Decided:		July 2, 2003

 

nt-family: Times New Roman">	We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Prater's appeal in cause
number 06-07-00187-CR.  For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not
been shown.
	We affirm the judgment. 

						Bailey C. Moseley
						Justice

Date Submitted:	August 8, 2008
Date Decided:		September 15, 2008

Do Not Publish
1. Prater appeals from eight convictions.  In cause number 06-07-00187-CR, he appeals from
his conviction of indecency with a child (A.C.P.) by sexual contact; in cause numbers 06-07-00188-CR through 06-07-00192-CR, he appeals his convictions of sexual assault of a child (A.C.P.).  In
each of these cases, Prater was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment, to run consecutively, and
$10,000.00 fines.
	Prater appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00193-CR of indecency with a child
(J.A.P.) by sexual contact.  Prater was sentenced in this case to twenty years' imprisonment, to run
consecutively, and a $10,000.00 fine.
	Prater also appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00194-CR of aggravated sexual
assault of a child (T.L.P.).  He was sentenced to life imprisonment, to run consecutively, and a
$10,000.00 fine.