Court Opinion

ID: 9649826
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 15:10:31.104003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:15.246175
License: Public Domain

Kenison, C.J.,
concurring: It may be noted for future reference that in the more recent cases and commentary the rationale of the exclusionary rule has been reviewed (Stone v. Powell, 96 S. Ct. 3037 (1976)), it has not been extended in its application (United States v. Janis, 96 S. Ct. 3021 (1976)), and in some respects may ¡ have been restricted in its application (United States v. Santana, 96 1 S. Ct. 2406 (1976)). See also American Law Institute, A Model ; Code of Pre-arraignment Procedure, May 20, 1976, § 290.2, at 181-83 (“substantial violations”): Address of Justice Schaefer of the Supreme Court of Illinois, delivered at the National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice, at 8-9, April 8, 1976, also reported in 70 F.R.D. 159, 172 (1976).