Court Opinion

ID: 5346096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 06:18:42.183104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:39.547833
License: Public Domain

Defendant, Joseph Rosenberg, appeals from an order finding him in contempt of court, fining him the sum of $3,050, with interest, making a total of $3,807, and directing that he may purge himself of contempt by paying to the receiver in the action the said amount within ten days, to be applied in favor of plaintiff and six other defendants named in the order. The judgment herein states that the sum of $8,917.28 was received by appellant from a life insurance company as proceeds of two life insurance policies on the life of Samuel Richardson, deceased, in trust for the use and benefit of plaintiff and all the defendants except appellant. The appellant was directed by said judgment to pay to the receiver in the action the sum of $3,050 (the amount of the claims of plaintiff and said defendants to said fund), with interest, together with costs. Appellant failed to make the payments. He has been punished for contempt for such failure. While the receiver in the action may not be an officer of the court as provided in section 505 of the Civil Practice Act, yet, since it appears that the moneys appellant bad in hand were a trust fund “ ear-marked as a specific or particular fund directed or required to be paid over ” (Nelson v. Hirsch, 264 N. Y. 316), the court had discretionary power, at least, to punish for cqntempt. The facts fully justified the exercise of the discretion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.