Court Opinion

ID: 9962282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-23 14:12:16.093842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:14.510862
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                         San Antonio, Texas
                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             No. 04-24-00173-CV

                                                Nick GRIEGO,
                                                   Appellant

                                                        v.

                                               Sonya GRIEGO,
                                                  Appellee

                      From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                    Trial Court No. 2021CI10614
                            Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Irene Rios, Justice
                  Beth Watkins, Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 17, 2024

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           The trial court signed a final, appealable judgment on March 22, 2022. Because appellant

did not timely file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due 30 days later, on April 21,

2022. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was

due by May 6, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

1
 Appellant contends that he timely filed a motion to set aside the final judgment. For the reasons explained below,
we lack jurisdiction over this appeal even if we assume appellant timely filed the motion to set aside the judgment.
                                                                                                  04-24-00173-CV

        Appellant filed his notice of appeal on March 8, 2024. “[O]nce the period for granting a

motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the

appellate court’s jurisdiction.” See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)

(construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, on March

25, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction. See id. In our order, we noted that if appellant failed to adequately respond to this

order by the date ordered, this appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3.

        On April 4, 2024, appellant filed a response to our order. In his response, he contends that

he timely filed a motion to set aside the judgment, and he explains that during the time between

the final judgment and his notice of appeal, he was attempting to set a hearing on that motion. He

also contends that the deadline for his notice of appeal did not begin to run until after a February

13, 2024 hearing in the trial court. 2

        The deadline to file a notice of appeal begins to run on the day the trial court signs a final

judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 01-19-00610-CV, 2019

WL 4677365, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 26, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.). Here, the

language of the trial court’s March 22, 2022 judgment shows the judgment was final and

appealable as of that date:

        IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that all relief requested in this case and not
        expressly granted is denied. This is a final judgment, for which let execution and
        all writs and processes necessary to enforce this judgment issue. This judgment
        finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is appealable.

2
 During the February 13, 2024 hearing, the trial court informed appellant that its plenary power over this case had
expired and it lacked authority to grant the relief he sought. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(f).

                                                       -2-
                                                                                         04-24-00173-CV

See, e.g., Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). Even if we assume

appellant timely filed his motion to set aside the judgment, his notice of appeal would have been

due no later than June 20, 2022, and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal

would have been due by July 5, 2022. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. The trial court’s failure to hold

a hearing or issue a written ruling on appellant’s motion to set aside the judgment did not extend

these deadlines. See, e.g., N. Cent. Baptist Hosp. v. Chavez, No. 04-02-00590-CV, 2021 WL

983351, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 17, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.) (noting the deadline

to file a notice of appeal “is not altered by a trial court’s ruling on a motion for new trial”). Because

appellant did not file his notice of appeal until March 8, 2024, we have no choice but to dismiss

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617.

                                                    PER CURIAM

                                                  -3-