Court Opinion

ID: 1000832
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:46:52.77055+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:56.132916
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7603

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ONTARIO LAMAR GAINEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-99-89-4-H)

Submitted:   February 10, 2000         Decided:     February 17, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ontario Lamar Gainey, Appellant Pro Se.   Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ontario Lamar Gainey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    The basis for the

claim Gainey seeks to raise was known to him at the time of sen-

tencing.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal because the § 2255 motion was not timely filed.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2