Court Opinion

ID: 9750982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 15:53:44.864814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:30.439085
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Reargument.
Per Curiam.
After our opinion in the above cases was *337filed, the petitioner by permission of the court presented a motion for leave to reargue, setting forth therein certain reasons on which he bases his contention that justice requires a reargument of the motion to dismiss.
Dick & Carty, Joseph B. Carty, for petitioner.
Boss, Conlan, Keenan, Bulman & Rice, John T. Keenan, for respondents.
We have carefully considered those reasons and in our judgment they present no matter which was not fully considered and passed upon in reaching the conclusion stated in our opinion.
Motion denied.