Court Opinion

ID: 1026759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:11:38.744247+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:17.964351
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  David L. Hodge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Hodge,
  
  No. 3:94-cr-00036-H-2 (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.