Court Opinion

ID: 9881355
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-01 23:09:45.187641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:26.227414
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                             NOS. WR-79,132-02 & WR-79,132-03

                      EX PARTE GABRIEL VILLARREAL, Applicant

              ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
          CAUSE NOS. 21,484-A & 21,485-A IN THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM POLK COUNTY

       Per curiam. KELLER, P.J., and YEARY and SLAUGHTER, JJ., dissented.

                                          OPINION

       A jury found Applicant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child in cause number 21,

484. Prior to the punishment phase, Applicant entered into a plea agreement and was sentenced to

fifty years’ imprisonment for that offense. Pursuant to that agreement, Applicant also pleaded guilty

in cause number 21,485 to aggravated sexual assault of a child (count I) and indecency with a child

(count II) and was sentenced to fifty-years’ imprisonment for count I and twenty years’ imprisonment

for count II, to run concurrently with each other and with the sentence in cause number 21,484.

Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective in cause number
                                                                                                   2

21,484 because he failed to adequately investigate the case and to call available defensive witnesses

during guilt-innocence. Based on the record, the trial court determined that trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and that Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court also determined that

trial counsel’s conduct in cause number 21,484 adversely affected and caused the guilty plea in cause

number 21,485. It recommended granting relief in both cases. This Court thereafter remanded the

cases a second time so that the trial court could make supplemental findings regarding the details of

the offense in cause number 21,485, including whether it was part of a package deal with cause

number 21,484. Ex parte Cox, 482 S.W.3d 112 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). The trial court has made

the requested supplemental findings, including that these cases were part of package deal. Now that

the record is complete, we agree.

       Relief is granted. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The judgments in cause

numbers 21,484 and 21,485 in the 258th District Court of Polk County are set aside, and Applicant

is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Polk County to answer the charges as set out in the

indictments. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date

of this Court’s mandate.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: September 27, 2023
Do not publish