Court Opinion

ID: 658211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:58:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:06.550490
License: Public Domain

10 F.3d 806
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Harold Elwood PRITCHETT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.D. K. SMITH;  B. Evans;  J. Streat, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6920.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  October 25, 1993.Decided:  November 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Harold Elwood Pritchett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with  Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order.  Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED