Court Opinion

ID: 9488933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 13:00:04.586848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:53:11.742060
License: Public Domain

ORDER
A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the appellee, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the appellant, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to and acted upon by *451the panel that heard the appeal, and, thereafter, the suggestion for rehearing in banc, the response and a reply to the response, having been referred to the judges authorized ■ to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc, and a poll having been requested, taken, and failed, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.
Circuit Judge Mayer concurs in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge Clevenger, with whom Circuit Judge Plager joins, concurs in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge Newman dissents in a separate opinion.
Chief Judge Archer, Circuit Judge Rich, and Circuit Judge Sehall did not participate in the poll.