Court Opinion

ID: 3967907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:27:13.78807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:47:26.202771
License: Public Domain

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquors to W.R. Cooper in a county where the sale of such liquors had been prohibited.
The evidence amply supporting the verdict, the only questions *Page 212 
necessary to be decided are those raised in the three bills of exception, this being a misdemeanor conviction.
In the first bill of exceptions it is shown that on cross-examination of defendant the State was permitted to ask him if he kept any kind of intoxicating liquor for sale in his drug store, to which question he answered that he kept alcohol. The prosecuting witness in this case had testified appellant sold him a half pint of alcohol; and whether or not he kept such an article for sale was a legitimate inquiry. Wagner v. State,53 Tex. Crim. 306; Starbeck v. State, 53 Tex. Crim. 192; Myers v. State, 52 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Field v. State,55 Tex. Crim. 524; Myers v. State, 56 Tex.Crim. Rep..
The only other bills in the record relate to the failure of the court to give some special charges relating to the argument of the county attorney. There are no bills of exception showing that such remarks were made by the county attorney. We think the remarks not improper as they were based on legitimate deductions from the testimony.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.