Court Opinion

ID: 9832833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:14:12.47229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:53.604282
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Further Reformation and Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing. '
The appellant in a motion for further reformation of the judgment in this case, calls attention to the fact that the amount for which judgment is here rendered is less than the face of the claim originally presented to the railroad company. That being true, the appellee was not entitled to recover $20 attorney’s fees included in the judgment of the trial court. The judgment will therefore be further reformed, so as to exclude the attorney’s fees.
The appellee, in a motion for a rehearing, *290insists that it was entitled to $6 charged for demurrage.- The evidence, we think, was not sufficient to authorize the rendition of a judgment for that charge.
The motion of the appellee for a rehearing is overrule'd, and the appellant’s motion for reformation of the judgment is granted.