Court Opinion

ID: 9672226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:51:16.071466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:15.039241
License: Public Domain

The following memorandum was filed March 30, 1965.
Per Curiam
(on motion for rehearing). In his brief in support of his motion for rehearing the defendant disputes the damages that were found for the plaintiff, Fringer. On reconsideration we are of the view that the trial court’s finding of $875 damages is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence, the pertinent elements of which are set forth in our original opinion.
We conclude, therefore, that the new trial ordered in our original mandate should include a new trial on the issue of the damages of plaintiff, Fringer. Our determination that the trial court’s finding of damages of the plaintiff, Schmitt, “is sustained” is reaffirmed. In all other respects we reaffirm our original opinion. The motion for rehearing is denied without costs.
*376bThe original mandate on this appeal is withdrawn and the corrected mandate shall read as follows:
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial consistent with the opinion, as modified by the memorandum on rehearing.