Court Opinion

ID: 8427883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 04:07:03.169833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:33.347944
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Robert Lee Hood appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hood v. Beck, No. CA-04-312-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED