Court Opinion

ID: 2541880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:17:22.108256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:41.885977
License: Public Domain

358 S.W.3d 587 (2012)
Kerwin D. SCOTT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96557.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Pour.
February 14, 2012.
Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kerwin Scott appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Scott's request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).