Court Opinion

ID: 996588
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:19.449079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:40.773356
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RAUL ARMANDO PILOTO,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-203-P, CA-97-194-P)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998                 Decided:   October 23, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raul Armando Piloto, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Piloto, Nos. CR-92-203-P; CA-97-194-P

(W.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2