Court Opinion

ID: 1013995
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:09:44.713491+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:26.402489
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Earnest Haynesworth appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion for return of property and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Haynesworth,
  
  No. CR-00-52 (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dis
   
   *747
   
  pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED