Court Opinion

ID: 4646544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-24 17:08:45.423431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:06.069885
License: Public Domain

People v Viehdeffer (2020 NY Slip Op 07800)

People v Viehdeffer

2020 NY Slip Op 07800

Decided on December 23, 2020

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2020
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

1149 KA 18-02047

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vKEVIN G. VIEHDEFFER, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN J. VIEHDEFFER, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN GEORGE VIEHDEFFER, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN VIEHDEFFER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Charles N. Zambito, J.), rendered April 27, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of bail jumping in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of bail jumping in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.56). Contrary to defendant's initial contention, the Court of Appeals has rejected the assertion that waivers of the right to appeal should be invalid per se (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 557-558, 558 n 1 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 8-9 [1989]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Love, 181 AD3d 1193, 1193 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: December 23, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court