Court Opinion

ID: 5078256
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 11:43:11.349968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:06.083121
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals after the trial court dismissed his Rule 29.15 motion. His motion was not timely filed. Movant concedes that the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled adversely to his position on this issue in other cases. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Walker v. Missouri, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).