Court Opinion

ID: 9407697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-08 00:01:09.449011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:39.742038
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11222         Document: 00516813358             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/07/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11222
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                     July 7, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Mark Blayke Mays,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 1:22-CR-41-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Mark Blayke Mays has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Mays has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-11222    Document: 00516813358         Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/07/2023

                                 No. 22-11222

   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2