Court Opinion

ID: 9725393
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 11:44:43.694745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:14.726908
License: Public Domain

*131aThe following memorandum was filed December 30, 1953 :
FaiRCHILd, J.
(on motion for rehearing). Counsel for the respondent executors in support of their motion for rehearing complain that our original opinion herein does not dispose of the issues raised as to the construction of the will of testatrix. By our determination that there was no joint tenancy in the postal savings certificates and preferred stock certificates of the Iowa County Livestock Marketing Co-operative issued in the name of testatrix, it necessarily follows that such assets are to be assigned by the county court in accordance with the provisions of the will of testatrix independently of the will of her husband, William F. Gabler.
Any question as to whether the $2,100 legacy of the son, Arthur F. Gabler, is to be paid twice or only once under both wills will not arise in this estate, which concerns only the will of testatrix, but such question may properly be raised for determination in the estate of William F. Gabler, which latter estate is not now before this court.
By the Court. — Motion for rehearing denied with costs.