Court Opinion

ID: 7385548
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:16:41.592205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:31.781679
License: Public Domain

Note —On the first point, vide Adams on Eject. 22, according to Which it sefms that in England the word tenement is not sufficiently certain in an ejectment, though it does not appear that the English cases had the additional designation by metes and bounds, vide also Byrd v. Clark. 2 Car. Law Rep 622. As to the other points, vide Governor v. Carter & others, 3 Hawks 328—Act of 1820, Rev. ch. 1066, and the case of Pope v. Bradley, 3 Hawks 16, decided thereon.—Jones v. Fulgham, 2 Murph. 364.