Court Opinion

ID: 7403546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:12:35.764748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:03.345056
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

— “ We can perceive no objection to the cause of action, and Waterhouse made no motion to dismiss in the.Circuit Court, but on the contrary must have resisted that made by Fickle.
“ As Fickle succeeded, in the Circuit Court, in reducing the judgment Waterhouse had obtained before the justice more than five dollars, and obtained a judgment in his own favor, it is evident that, this is not a case covered by the 3d clause of section 175, ch. 47, (p. 892) of the Revised Statutes, as he alleges it is,”
Judgment affirmed, &c.