Court Opinion

ID: 7798973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-09 00:00:30.844474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:53.800507
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-20571      Document: 00516423762         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/08/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                   August 8, 2022
                                  No. 21-20571
                                                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jonathan Keith Senteno,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:13-CR-528-1

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonathan Keith
   Senteno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Senteno has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-20571     Document: 00516423762          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/08/2022

                                   No. 21-20571

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2