Court Opinion

ID: 3388518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:46:11.331937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:41.951849
License: Public Domain

Upon a mortgage foreclosure brought by appellee, the final decree awarded complainant $2,000.00 as principal, plus $682.57 as interest, plus taxes and costs. The decree also confirmed the report of the general master in chancery finding the sum of $500.00 as a reasonable attorney's fee. No predicate is laid in the bill of complaint, that complainant ever agreed or was obligated to pay his solicitors any amount to foreclose said mortgage, which is a *Page 1111 
prerequisite to an awarding of such fees. Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger, 98 Fla. 779, 124 So. R. 41.
Each point raised by appellant has been duly considered and there being no error shown as to awarding the decree for principal, interest, taxes and costs, the final decree is affirmed as to those items. See Wayne Realty  Inv. Co. v. Whitten, 90 Fla. 433, 106 So. R. 125; Simon v. Williams,140 Miss. 854, 44 A. L. R. 402, 406; Kirkland v. Tampa, 75 Fla. 271, 78 So. R. 17.
The decree is reversed as to the awarding of $500.00 solicitor's fee, which is nearly 20% of the sum of the principal and interest due. It is not only excessive, but there is no allegation or proof that complainant ever agreed to pay any fee to his solicitors. Winchester v. Hak, 98 Fla. 1071, 124 So. R. 812.
We do not overlook the fact that this case has heretofore been appealed to this Court from an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, which demurrer was found to be without merit (Reid v. Merrill, 94 Fla. 964, 114 So. R. 783) and the order overruling same affirmed without formal opinion. It is also noted that the issues are very simple, the transcript containing only 104 pages on this appeal from final decree.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.