Court Opinion

ID: 9513597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:38:15.148942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:56.074312
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, J„
dissenting.
[¶ 21] I continue to believe that “[r]e-spect for law and human dignity can best be fostered by a process that is fair and just.” Sandbeck, 524 N.W.2d at 852 (Sandstrom, J., dissenting). Rockwell was not afforded a fair and just process in that case. He clearly objected to the process and made a record of what he would have presented had he been permitted.
[¶ 22] After careful review of the record in this case, I cannot conclude that Todd Skadberg objected to the process or *878was prevented from presenting evidence. I therefore concur in the result.
[¶ 16] Dale V. Sandstrom