Court Opinion

ID: 8771399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 12:45:23.18392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:14.506411
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Charley James, who is plaintiff in error, was indicted in the United States Court in the Indian Territory, Central District, for stealing a horse. The indictment charged that the horse was owned by one S. K. Canady. The proof showed that it was owned by one S. K. Kennedy. The only assignment of error pressed upon us, is that such proof disclosed a fatal variance from the allegation. To this we cannot give our assent. The names “S. K. *943Canady” and “S. K. Kennedy” sound so much alike when spoken colloquially as to be distinguishable only by the keenest attention. The rule idem sonans applies, '¡'here being no claim that any one by the name of “Canady,” as distinguished from “Kennedy,” owned the stolen horse, the defendant was not misled by the misspelling.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory, affirming the judgment of comiction, is accordingly affirmed.