Court Opinion

ID: 8457945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:56:09.111825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:06.004196
License: Public Domain

*994MEMORANDUM **
Shannon Lucienne White appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for credit/debit card fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(29), and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
White contends that the district court erred by determining that the loss amount exceeded $100,000, for purposes of enhancing her offense level under the U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(F). We conclude that the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. Santos, 527 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir.2008).
White also challenges the district court’s calculation of loss amount for purposes of restitution. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. De La Fuente, 353 F.3d 766, 772-774 (9th Cir.2003).
White further contends that the district court erred in determining that she was not entitled to a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. We reject this contention. See United States v. Scrivener, 189 F.3d 944, 948-49 (9th Cir.1999); see also United States v. Rutledge, 28 F.3d 998, 1002 (9th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.