Court Opinion

ID: 9667066
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 01:34:18.751212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:34.605400
License: Public Domain

On Petition to Rehear.
FELTS, J.
Defendant Thornton has filed a petition to rehear complaining of our decision affirming tbe Chancellor’s decree, which held that defendant bad wilfully concealed from complainant tbe fact that said automobile was not a new, but a used car.
Tbe petition points out no matter of law or fact overlooked, but is only a reargument of matters already thoroughly argued by counsel and fully considered and determined by us.
Tbe office of ,a petition to rehear is to call tbe attention of tbe court to matters overlooked, not to those *224things which counsel supposes were improperly decided after full consideration. Cox v. McCartney, Tenn. App., 236 S. W. (2d) 736, 739, and numerous cases there cited.
The petition is denied at petitioner’s cost.
Howell and Hickerson, JJ., concur.