Court Opinion

ID: 8030077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:04:08.069826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.503559
License: Public Domain

On November 16, 2001, the defendant was sentenced to the following: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of thirteen (13) months, with four (4) years suspended, for the offense of DUI, Fourth or Subsequent Offense, a felony; and Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended for Persistent Felony Offender Status, to run consecutive to the DUI sentence.
On November 3, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Stan Peeler. The state was represented by Todd Whipple.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 3rd day of November, 2006.
Chairperson, Hon. John Whelan, Member, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding and Alt. Member, Hon. Kurt Krueger