Court Opinion

ID: 4674574
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-05 17:11:43.272505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:21.370562
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Viers v. Kubach, 2021-Ohio-1135.]

                                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

 JANET A. VIERS,                                  :       MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
                                                          CASE NO. 2021-L-015
         - vs -                                   :

 EVELYN EVANS KUBACH,                :
 INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE
 UNDER THE J. LEONARD EVANS TRUST :
 AGREEMENT DATED 06/16/1958, et al.,
                                     :
            Defendant-Appellant.

 Civil Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, Case No.
 2017 CV 1038.

 Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

 John P. Thomas, Schraff Thomas Law, LLC, 2802 S.O.M. Center Road, Suite 200,
 Willoughby Hills, OH 44094 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

 Michael C. Cohan, Roy A. Krall, and Spencer E. Krebs, Cavitch, Familo & Durkin, 1300
 East Ninth Street, 20th Floor, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Defendant-Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J.

        {¶1}      Appellant, Evelyn Evans Kubach, individually, and as trustee under the J.

Leonard Evans Trust Agreement dated 06/16/1958, appeals from a December 31, 2020

entry of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division. Because the probate

court’s judgment entry is not a final appealable order for the reasons that follow, we

hereby dismiss this appeal.
       {¶2}   Appellee, Janet A. Viers, filed a complaint alleging several claims for relief,

including a claim for attorney’s fees and costs, against Kubach and several other

defendants. After a bench trial, in an entry dated December 31, 2020, the trial court

issued judgment in favor of Viers on four counts and judgment in favor of Kubach on four

counts, and deferred the issue of Viers’s attorney’s fees and expenses to a later date.

The entry did not include “there is no just reason for delay” language pursuant to Civ.R.

54(B). This appeal ensued.

       {¶3}   Initially, we must determine if there is a final order since this court may

entertain only those appeals from final judgments. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92,

96 (1989). According to Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, a trial court’s

judgment can only be immediately reviewed by an appellate court if it constitutes a “final

order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶

3. If it is not final, then an appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review the matter,

and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d

17, 20 (1989). For a judgment to be final and appealable, it must satisfy the requirements

of R.C. 2505.02 and if applicable, Civ.R. 54(B). See Children’s Hosp. Med. Ctr. v.

Tomaiko, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2011-P-0103, 2011-Ohio-6838, ¶ 3.

       {¶4}   Pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B), there are seven categories of a “final order,”

and if the judgment of the trial court satisfies any of them, it will be deemed a “final order”

and can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals.

       {¶5}   Civ.R. 54(B) provides the following:

              When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action whether
              as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, and * * *
              when multiple parties are involved, the court may enter final
              judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties

                                              2
              only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for
              delay. In the absence of a determination that there is no just reason
              for delay, any order * * * which adjudicates fewer than all the claims
              or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, shall not
              terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order
              or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the
              entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and
              liabilities of all the parties.

       {¶6}   The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that “when attorney fees are requested

in the original pleadings, an order that does not dispose of the attorney-fee claim and

does not include, pursuant to Civ.R. 54(B), an express determination that there is no just

reason for delay, is not a final, appealable order.” Internatl. Bhd. of Electrical Workers,

Local Union No. 8 v. Vaughn Industries, L.L.C., 116 Ohio St.3d 335, 2007-Ohio-6439, ¶

17; see also Urso v. Compact Cars, Inc., 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2005-T-0037, 2005-

Ohio-6292, ¶ 8; Montello v. Ackerman, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2009-L-111, 2019-Ohio-6383,

¶ 7.

       {¶7}   Here, the claim for attorney fees is still pending in the trial court and the

December 31, 2020 entry on appeal contains no Civ.R. 54(B) language. Thus, without

the inclusion of Civ.R. 54(B) language, there is no final appealable order, and this court

is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.

       {¶8}   Appeal dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.

                                               3