Court Opinion

ID: 4220160
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-14 16:12:10.872265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:37.133649
License: Public Domain

People v Rutledge (2017 NY Slip Op 07959)

People v Rutledge

2017 NY Slip Op 07959

Decided on November 14, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2017

Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Moulton, JJ.

4948 1232/09

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vMichael Rutledge, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), rendered May 3, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 14, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.