Court Opinion

ID: 4501001
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-23 23:13:21.555905+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:07:11.973784
License: Public Domain

Appeals Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2020.

                                      In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-19-00743-CR
                               NO. 14-19-00744-CR
                               NO. 14-19-00745-CR

               CHRISTOPHER DEMOND HOLLIS, Appellant
                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 337th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
            Trial Court Cause Nos. 1497343, 1500001, and 1516940

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant was indicted for one count of capital murder and two counts of
aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the
State agreed (1) to reduce the capital-murder charge to murder and (2) that
appellant’s punishment in each case would not exceed 50 years’ imprisonment, and
appellant agreed to plead guilty to each offense. The trial court sentenced appellant
to 50 years’ imprisonment for each offense, the sentences to run concurrently.
Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal in each case.

      A plea bargain case is one in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo
contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the
prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement
that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2003) (sentence bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on
sentences, including a recommended “cap” on sentencing). A charge bargain—that
is, where the State agrees to reduce the charged offense in exchange for the
defendant’s plea of guilty or nolo contendere—is also a plea bargain for purposes of
Rule 25.2(a)(2). Id. at 812–13. In a plea bargain case, appellant has the right to
appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) only: (A) those matters
that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after
receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338,
340–41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).

      Appellant’s punishment of 50 years’ imprisonment for each conviction does
not exceed the agreed cap of 50 years. The record does not contain any appealable
pretrial rulings, and the trial court did not grant appellant permission to appeal.
Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals.

      The trial court signed certifications stating that each case “is not a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has the right of appeal.” Because the record did not support
those certifications, we requested the trial court to review the records and, if
necessary, correct the certifications. The trial court signed amended certifications
stating each case was a plea-bargain case and the defendant had no right of appeal.
The record supports the amended certifications.

                                           2
      The appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

                                         3