Court Opinion

ID: 9574464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:05:14.211062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:36.353576
License: Public Domain

WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.
(concurring). I join both the reasoning and the result of the majority opinion. I also join the concurring opinion authored by Justice Wilcox. I write only to express a concern regarding one of the named defendants.
At oral argument, Mr. Burkes' attorney was asked the reason why Nicholas Hurtgen was named as a defendant in this matter. Although Hurtgen sometimes sits as trustee as the secretary's designee, Hurtgen did not sit as trustee in this particular matter, nor did he cast a vote. From the record before us, I can discern, at best, only peripheral involvement by Mr. Hurtgen. The answer given at oral argument was unsatisfactory.