Court Opinion

ID: 667318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:20:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:24.728325
License: Public Domain

21 F.3d 423NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Miguel PADILLA, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Patrick WHALEN, Warden;  Mr. Ellis;  Medical Department,Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7327.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-358-A)
Miguel Padilla, appellant pro se.
Dennis Edward Szybala, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens* action.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Padilla v. Whalen, No. CA-91-358-A (E.D. Va.  Oct. 19, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed.  Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)