Court Opinion

ID: 8276011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 02:15:39.988746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:38.616513
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
It appears from the record that the defendant is the owner of a number of push carts which he rents. One was rented by the plaintiff, and, not being returned by him, the defendant went to the market and found and took the cart. There was some fruit in the cart belonging to the plaintiff when the defendant took it, for the value of which plaintiff sued. There is no competent evidence of the value of the fruit, except that given without objection by the defendant and his witness, which fixes it at $2.
The judgment should be reduced to the sum of $2, and $5 costs in the court below, and affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.