Court Opinion

ID: 3162300
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-14 21:01:09.73533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:42.411714
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            DEC 14 2015

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTENIO AGUILAR BEJAR, AKA                       No. 13-71508
Artemio Aguilar Teja, AKA Antonio
Aguilar Bejar,                                   Agency No. A205-317-942

               Petitioner,
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

               Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted December 9, 2015**

Before:        WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

      Artenio Aguilar Bejar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for

review.

      We lack jurisdiction to consider Aguilar Bejar’s due process claim because it

is procedural in nature and he failed to raise it to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft,

358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

                                          2                                    13-71508