Court Opinion

ID: 9399611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-05 20:12:28.948942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:24.303441
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,            :    No. 2975 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
                                            :
                     Petitioner             :
                                            :    No. 63 DB 2023
              v.                            :
                                            :
                                            :    Attorney Registration No. 73573
 NICHOLAS ERMOLOVICH,                       :
                                            :
                     Respondent             :    (Lancaster County)

                                        ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2023, having received no response to a

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Nicholas Ermolovich is placed on temporary

suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He shall comply

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

      Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

      This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(3)

(providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Rule 402 when “an order of

temporary suspension from the practice of law is entered by the Court pursuant to

Enforcement Rule 208(f)”).