Court Opinion

ID: 9662952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 23:23:57.348559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:44.127375
License: Public Domain

Corrigan, C.J.
I concur in the denial order. Contrary to the assertion of plaintiffs, the chief judges have not admitted that the fee schedule provides unreasonable compensation. Moreover, the fee schedule includes a mechanism for counsel to request additional fees in exceptional cases. The present fee schedule does not present the systemic failure to provide reasonable compensation that was found in the fixed fee schedule at issue in In re Recorder’s Court Bar Ass’n v Wayne Circuit Court, 443 Mich 110 (1993). Plaintiff’s anecdotal claims of unreasonably low compensation do not show that the fees paid to appointed counsel are generally unreasonable. See In re Meizlish, 387 Mich 228 (1972). A comparison of fees paid currently to fees paid in the past or to fees paid to nonappointed attorneys is not dispositive. There have been increased efficiencies and new cost-saving technologies over the years, as well as increases in costs; and the overhead costs for attorneys assigned to indigent criminal defendants are sometimes lower than similar costs for attorneys performing other types of work. Recorder’s Court Bar Ass’n, 443 Mich 114 n 4. Nor have plaintiffs shown that the fees paid for an entire case or fees that an attorney receives over time are generally so low as to be unreasonable. Although plaintiffs have shown that fees paid under the Wayne Circuit Court fee schedule are frequently low, plaintiffs have not shown that the fee schedule generally results in unreasonable compensation. According to national compensation figures prepared by the Spangenberg Group for the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, the average compensation paid to plaintiffs falls near the middle of the range of compensation nationwide.1
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ. We would appoint a master.

 The figures can be accessed at http://www.mipublicdefense. org/research/2002%20non-capital%20rates.pdf