Court Opinion

ID: 1004304
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:39:05.732393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:31.827469
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Alphin Aircraft, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order denying its motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Zeus Enters., Inc. v. Alphin Aircraft, Inc.,
  
  No. CA-97-294 (E.D.Va. May 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.