Court Opinion

ID: 9634755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 13:22:34.583023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:51.961033
License: Public Domain

PELLEGRINI, Judge,
concurring.
I join with the majority in holding that the presumption created by the introduction of the “REPORT OF THE CLERK OF COURT SHOWING THE CONVICTION OF ANY ACT IN WHICH A JUDGE DETERMINES THAT A MOTOR VEHICLE WAS ESSENTIALLY INVOLVED” is not rebutted by a transcript which did not include a reference to a judge’s specific finding that a motor vehicle was involved. To rebut that presumption, Licensee is required to introduce a certified copy of the docket entries of the criminal proceeding that resulted in his felony conviction, indicating that the trial court never entered an order making a determination that “a motor vehicle was essentially involved.” Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Johns, 153 Pa.Cmwlth. 312, 621 A.2d 1064 (1993).