Court Opinion

ID: 1005484
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:28.266167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:36.477203
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-7035

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DONALD LEE WRAY,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-95-896, CA-01-146)

Submitted:   October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Lee Wray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Donald Lee Wray seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001) and motion to reconsider.   We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

United States v. Wray, Nos. CR-95-896; CA-01-146 (D.S.C. Mar. 28,

2001; Feb. 13, 2001); see also United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d

139, 151 (4th Cir. 2001).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2