Court Opinion

ID: 1003747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:30:55.042844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:28.201879
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6941

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DONNELL DECOL GARDNER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CR-95-3)

Submitted:   February 22, 2001         Decided:     February 27, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnell Decol Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Donnell Decol Gardner appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Gardner, No. CR-95-3 (W.D.N.C.

filed May 31, 2000; entered June 1, 2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2