Court Opinion

ID: 9964311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-29 17:01:38.662572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:18.514846
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10859    Document: 19-1     Date Filed: 04/29/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 24-10859
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE,
       NURSE ELLIS,
       Head Nurse,

                                                  Defendants-Appellees.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Alabama
USCA11 Case: 24-10859        Document: 19-1        Date Filed: 04/29/2024       Page: 2 of 2

       2                        Opinion of the Court                     24-10859

                     D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cv-00851-ECM-JTA
                            ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Robert Crenshaw, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals
       the district court’s January 11, 2024, final order and judgment. The
       statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or
       before February 12, 2024, the Monday following 30 days from the
       entry of judgment on January 11, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a);
       Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, he did not file the
       instant notice of appeal until March 12, 2024, and thus, it cannot
       invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United
       States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Hamer v. Neighborhood
       Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). 1
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.

       1 Prior to the instant notice of appeal, Crenshaw filed two timely notices of

       appeal, resulting in appeal Nos. 24‑10250 and 24‑10338.