Court Opinion

ID: 5730515
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:23:36.766423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:52.633621
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
As the result of an investigation, correction officers discovered that petitioner exchanged marihuana with his wife during a visit, asked her to repackage it and to bring it back to the correctional facility during a subsequent visit. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling and two counts of possessing or conspiring to possess drugs. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of smuggling and one count of conspiring to possess drugs. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author and the considerable documentary evi*1123dence, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Lovett v Goord, 26 AD3d 563, 564 [2006]). Petitioner’s testimony that he was “set up” by his wife, sister and brother-in-law for failing to cooperate in their plan to smuggle drugs presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Vann v Goord, 308 AD2d 611, 612 [2003]). Petitioner’s procedural claims have either not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.