Court Opinion

ID: 8065751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:47:12.068229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:11.946275
License: Public Domain

Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.
For affirmance — The Chahcellob, Chiee Justice, Paeicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.