Court Opinion

ID: 9724050
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 10:42:35.602734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:54.825711
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
Landis, J.
Appellant has filed petition for rehearing attempting to raise for the first time certain constitutional questions not heretofore raised on this appeal. Appellant has given no reason to excuse his failure seasonably to present such questions, and it is well settled that an appellant may not sit idly by and await the outcome of an appeal before presenting questions on rehearing which should have been previously presented to this Court for decision. See: Kilgallen v. State (1922), 192 Ind. 531, 546, 137 N. E. 178.
Appellant’s petition for rehearing is further insufficient to present any issue for decision as no arguments are advanced by brief or otherwise to indicate how or in what respect the alleged constitutional provisions in question were violated.
Petition for rehearing denied.
Aehor, C. J., and Arterburn, Jackson and Myers, JJ., concur.
Note. — Reported in 201 N. E. 2d 333. Rehearing denied 202 N. E. 2d 164.