Court Opinion

ID: 9962227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-23 11:09:11.342449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:08.087133
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2024

                                      NO. 03-23-00129-CV

Appellant, Jose Margarito Palacios// Cross-Appellants, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios,
                  Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales

                                                 v.

  Appellees, Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of
  Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios,
          and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios

       APPEAL FROM 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
       BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS
          AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART --
                     OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 24, 2023. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the trial court’s judgment in part. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s final judgment to

the extent it ordered that Jose Margarito Palacios take nothing on his counterclaim for

declaratory judgment, and reverses the judgment as to Intervenors’ claim for unjust enrichment,

and renders judgment that Intervenors take nothing on this claim. Each party shall bear their

own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.