Court Opinion

ID: 2926375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:28:32.468022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:38.061530
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00464-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE REGINALD MEDINA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

	Relator, Reginald Medina, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on August 13, 2009, through which he complains that the trial court erred in refusing to
issue a nunc pro tunc judgment reflecting the time credit to which relator is allegedly
entitled.  The Court requested and received a response from the real party in interest, the
State of Texas, acting by and through the Criminal District Attorney of Nueces County,
Texas.

	The real party in interest has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition
for writ of mandamus.  According to the motion, the matters in this original proceeding have
been resolved and this proceeding has been rendered moot. 
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the parties are entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition for writ of
mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT without reference to the merits thereof. 

								PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 28th day of August, 2009.
 

 
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).