Court Opinion

ID: 9951803
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-19 12:07:05.028923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:50.084902
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

                                  No. COA23-550

                               Filed 19 March 2024

Cleveland County, Nos. 19CRS1723 19CRS54337-38

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

            v.

DAVID ASHLEY BIVINS

      Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 23 March 2021 by Judge

Gregory R. Hayes in Cleveland County Superior Court.      Heard in the Court of

Appeals 21 February 2024.

      Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General, Kerry M.
      Boehm, for the State.

      Michelle Abbott, for the defendant-appellant.

      TYSON, Judge.

      David Ashley Bivins (“Defendant”) appeals from judgment entered upon a

jury’s verdicts for Selling or Delivering a Schedule II Controlled Substance and

Felonious Possession with Intent to Sell or Deliver Methamphetamine. The judgment

he appeals from was also entered pursuant to a plea agreement for Felonious

Possession with Intent to Sell or Deliver Methamphetamine, Selling or Delivering a

Schedule II Controlled Substance, and to attaining Habitual Felon Status.     We

discern no error at trial or in the plea agreement, but vacate the judgment and
                                     STATE V. BIVINS

                                     Opinion of the Court

remand for the trial court to correct a State-conceded sentencing error.

                                I.      Background

      Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office Narcotics Division and a confidential

informant participated in a controlled buy of methamphetamine on 20 July 2019 and

again on 8 August 2019. The confidential informant had previously worked with

Narcotic Division deputies and participated in multiple controlled buys of drugs.

Narcotic Division deputies met with the informant prior to the buy, searched his

person for contraband, provided him with $200 in marked currency, and equipped

him with a cell phone capable of recording the interaction.

      The confidential informant traveled to a local motel, while being surveilled

from the neighboring Bojangles restaurant parking lot, and purchased 1.95 grams of

methamphetamine from Defendant. Following the buy, the confidential informant

“turned over the meth” to the Narcotic Division lead deputy.        The lead deputy

debriefed with the confidential informant to confirm the details of the buy, searched

his person and his vehicle to ensure the integrity of the controlled buy, and then

released the informant.    The lead deputy entered the sealed bag of suspected

methamphetamine into the Sheriff’s Office secured evidence locker and submitted it

for laboratory analysis.

      On 23 March 2021, a jury convicted Defendant of one count of Possession with

Intent to Sell or Deliver Methamphetamine and one count of Selling or Delivering a

Schedule II Controlled Substance. After the jury’s verdict, but prior to sentencing,

                                            -2-
                                      STATE V. BIVINS

                                      Opinion of the Court

Defendant also entered into a plea arrangement with the State. Defendant pleaded

guilty to having attained Habitual Felon Status, along with one additional count of

Possession with Intent to Sell or Deliver Methamphetamine and one additional count

of Selling or Delivering a Schedule II Controlled Substance pursuant to a plea

agreement, which stemmed from a second controlled buy by the same confidential

informant from Defendant on 8 August 2019.

      At the sentencing hearing held on 23 March 2021, the State submitted a Prior

Record Level Worksheet (“PRL Worksheet”) and copies of records of the Defendant’s

prior convictions to support the worksheet. The PRL Worksheet submitted by the

State assigned a total of sixteen points to Defendant, based upon seven prior

misdemeanor convictions, three prior felony convictions, and for Defendant being on

probation at the time of the offense.

      Defendant stipulated to his prior record level and signed the PRL Worksheet.

His four substantive convictions were consolidated for sentencing. Defendant was

sentenced as a level V offender to 127 to 165 months of active imprisonment.

      Defendant filed a petition for writ of certiorari on 6 September 2022, seeking a

belated appeal after failure to enter timely notice of appeal. This Court granted

Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari on 26 October 2022.

                                II.      Jurisdiction

      This Court possesses jurisdiction pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(5)

(2023) and N.C. R. App. P. 21(a)(1).

                                             -3-
                                     STATE V. BIVINS

                                    Opinion of the Court

                                    III.   Issues

      Defendant challenges his sentence of 127 to 165 months imprisonment for two

counts of Selling or Delivering a Schedule II Controlled Substance, two counts of

Felonious Possession with Intent to Sell or Deliver Methamphetamine, and attaining

Habitual Felon Status. Defendant argues the trial court erred by sentencing him at

an inflated prior record level. The State concedes this error.

                             IV.    Sentencing Error

                               A. Standard of Review

      Sentencing errors are preserved for appellate review “even though no objection,

exception, or motion has been made in the trial division.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-

1446(d)(18) (2023). Although a defendant may stipulate to “the existence of [his or

her] prior convictions, which may be used to determine the defendant’s prior record

level for sentencing purposes, the trial court’s assignment of defendant’s prior record

level is a question of law.” State v. Gardner, 225 N.C. App. 161, 167, 736 S.E.2d 826,

830-31 (2013) (citation omitted). “The determination of an offender’s prior record

level is a conclusion of law that is subject to de novo review on appeal.” State v. Bohler,

198 N.C. App. 631, 633, 681 S.E.2d 801, 804 (2009) (citing State v. Fraley, 182 N.C.

App. 683, 691, 643 S.E.2d 39, 44 (2007)).

                                      B. Analysis

      Our General Statutes provide: “The prior record level of a felony offender is

determined by calculating the sum of the points assigned to each of the offender’s

                                           -4-
                                    STATE V. BIVINS

                                    Opinion of the Court

prior convictions . . . .” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(a) (2023). A prior record level

is determined by counting eligible points for prior convictions the State has proven.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b), (f). Generally, only non-traffic Class A1 and Class

1 misdemeanor offenses count. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b). Convictions of

Class 2 and Class 3 misdemeanors do not count. See id.

      One point is assigned for misdemeanor convictions, and a misdemeanor is

“defined as any Class A1 and Class 1 nontraffic misdemeanor offense.” N.C. Gen.

Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(5). The following misdemeanor offenses also receive one prior

record point: (1) Impaired Driving, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-138.1 (2023); (2)

Impaired Driving in a Commercial Vehicle, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-138.2;

and, (3) Death by Vehicle, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-141.4(a2). N.C. Gen. Stat.

§ 15A-1340.14(b)(5).

      The points assigned for prior felony convictions include two points for Class H

or I Felony convictions, and four points for Class G Felony convictions. N.C. Gen.

Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(3)-(4). Prior felony convictions used to establish whether a

person has attained habitual felon status do not also count in determining a prior

record level. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-7.6 (2023).

      When multiple convictions are entered in the same superior court session in

the same calendar week, only the conviction carrying the most points is assessed.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(d). If a prior offender is convicted of more than one

offense in a single session of district court, only one of the convictions is used. Id.

                                           -5-
                                   STATE V. BIVINS

                                   Opinion of the Court

      The relevant statutes “do not prohibit the court from using one conviction

obtained in a single calendar week to establish habitual felon status and using

another separate conviction obtained in the same week to determine prior record

level.” State v. Truesdale, 123 N.C. App. 639, 642, 473 S.E.2d 670, 672 (1996).

      An offender with ten to thirteen points shall be sentenced as a prior record

level IV, and an offender with fourteen to seventeen points shall be sentenced as a

prior record level V. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(c).

      On appeal, Defendant points out several purported errors in the trial court’s

sentencing. First, a clerical discrepancy exists between the PRL Worksheet and the

structured sentencing document. The PRL Worksheet states Defendant had sixteen

prior record level points, while the structured sentencing document listed fifteen prior

record level points. Regardless of the variance in points between the two documents,

the trial court sentenced Defendant as a level V offender.

      Second, Defendant asserts, and the State concedes, he was erroneously

assessed with four additional points to increase his prior record level from IV to V.

The PRL Worksheet shows seven points for prior misdemeanors, eight points for prior

felonies, and one point for committing the current offense while on probation, which

totals sixteen points.

      Defendant has accumulated seventeen prior misdemeanor convictions over a

ten-year period. Four of Defendant’s misdemeanor convictions are for traffic-related

offenses, which are not included in the prior record level calculation per N.C. Gen.

                                          -6-
                                    STATE V. BIVINS

                                    Opinion of the Court

Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(5). Four of Defendant’s misdemeanor convictions are for Class

2 or 3 offenses, and those convictions are also excluded in the prior record level

calculation. Id. Four of Defendant’s misdemeanor convictions were entered on the

same date as an offense with a higher point total. The higher-point total conviction

is the only conviction properly included in Defendant’s point total calculation

pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(d).          In accordance with the statutes’

disregard and exclusion of certain convictions, Defendant’s PRL Worksheet should

include a total of five points for five countable misdemeanors under N.C. Gen. Stat.

§ 15A-1340.14(b)(5).

      Defendant also has six prior felony convictions, in addition to the four felony

convictions before us on appeal. Here, three of those six prior convictions were used

to establish the indictment that Defendant had attained habitual felon status, and

two felonies occurred on the same day, leaving only two felonies to be assessed in the

PRL Worksheet calculation. See Truesdale, 123 N.C. App. at 642, 473 S.E.2d at 672;

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(d).

      One of these is a Class I felony, properly assessed at two points. N.C. Gen.

Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(4). The other was a Class G felony to be assigned four points.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(3). Under the current statutes, Defendant’s PRL

Worksheet should include a total of six points based upon the two qualifying felony

convictions, and not those otherwise used to support the habitual felon indictment or

occurring on the same court session.

                                           -7-
                                   STATE V. BIVINS

                                  Opinion of the Court

      N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(7) provides that one additional point should

be assigned “if the offense was committed while the offender was on supervised or

unsupervised probation, parole, or post-release supervision . . . .” In this case, the

Defendant stipulated to the fact that he was on probation for prior offenses at the

time of the current offenses, which supports the addition of one point to be included

in his PRL Worksheet calculation. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(7).

      Additionally, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(6) provides one additional prior

record level point may be assigned “[i]f all the elements of the present offense are

included in any prior offense for which the offender was convicted, whether or not the

prior offense or offenses were used in determining prior record level, 1 point.” On

appeal, the State argues Defendant should have been assessed one additional point

because all elements of the present offense for Selling or Delivering a Schedule II

Controlled Substance are included in Defendant’s prior offense on 6 April 2016 for

Selling or Delivering a Schedule II Controlled substance conviction. On remand for

resentencing, the trial court should assess whether one additional point should be

added pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(6).

      Under the current statutes, Defendant’s prior record level should have been

assessed as at least twelve points: five for misdemeanors, six for felonies, and one

additional point for being on probation at the time of the offense. Depending on the

trial court’s assessment of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.14(b)(6), Defendant’s prior

record level potentially could be assessed as thirteen total points. N.C. Gen. Stat.

                                         -8-
                                      STATE V. BIVINS

                                  Opinion of the Court

§ 15A-1340.14. Regardless of whether the trial court assesses Defendant’s prior

record level as twelve or thirteen total points to support a prior record level IV, the

trial court erred when sentencing Defendant by assigning three additional prior

record level points to achieve a prior record level V. The State concedes this error.

                                 V.     Conclusion

      Defendant received a fair trial, free from prejudicial errors he preserved or

argued on appeal. His waivers of trial and guilty pleas to other crimes under the plea

agreement are not challenged as not knowingly and intelligently entered.

      After using three prior felony convictions to support his habitual felon

indictment and excluding non-qualifying prior convictions, Defendant should have

been sentenced within the presumptive range, per the plea agreement, as a prior

record level IV offender with twelve or thirteen prior record level points. The trial

court’s judgments are vacated, and we remand for re-sentencing based on the

conceded proper prior record level. It is so ordered.

NO ERROR AT TRIAL; JUDGMENT VACATED AND REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.

      Judges MURPHY and WOOD concur.

                                           -9-