Court Opinion

ID: 9409459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-18 14:09:10.651538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:50.685766
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-23-00277-CV

           In re the State of Texas ex rel. Dee Hobbs, Williamson County Attorney

                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging several actions by

the trial court in the underlying criminal proceeding, including the trial court’s failure to include

an affirmative finding of family violence in the final judgment of conviction. Having reviewed

the petition and the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.8(a). 1

       1  We note that the record reflects that the trial court made an implicit, affirmative finding
of family violence when it entered its original final judgment. See In re Cherry, 258 S.W.3d
328, 333 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, no pet.) (“A judgment nunc pro tunc is the appropriate
avenue to make a correction when the court’s records do not mirror the judgment that was
actually rendered.”). But the record does not demonstrate that the State sought to have the trial
court correct the judgment to include the affirmative finding. See Jackson v. State,
No. 14-13-00747-CV, 2014 WL 6085593, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 13,
2014, no pet.) (upholding judgment nunc pro tunc correcting judgment to reflect affirmative
finding of family violence because record reflected the error “was clearly a clerical one”); cf.
Terrazas v. Ramirez, 829 S.W.2d 712, 723 (Tex. 1991) (“[M]andamus is not available to compel
an action which has not first been demanded and refused.”).
                                            __________________________________________
                                            Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Filed: July 18, 2023

                                               2