Court Opinion

ID: 8450428
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:01:01.960096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.061282
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jose Lopez-Alvarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 120-month sentence for importation of heroin and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lopez-Alvarez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Lopez-Alvarez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.