Court Opinion

ID: 685997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:46.628993
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1469
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Richard VINES, a/k/a Abdur R. Shabazz, Petitioner Appellant,v.Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent Appellee.
No. 94-6632.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 1994.Decided Dec. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.  (CA-93-1091-2).
Richard Vines, Appellant Pro Se.  Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Vines v. Angelone, No. CA-93-1091-2 (E.D. Va.  May 26, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.