Court Opinion

ID: 4892485
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-02 23:52:10.111985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:09:45.750666
License: Public Domain

Roberts, Chief Justice.
The defendant was charged and convicted of an aggravated assault and battery.
The matters alleged to raise the offense to an aggravated instead of a simple assault and battery were that the defendant “with premeditated design, with a certain deadly weapon, to wit, a glass beer tumbler, a means calculated to inflict a great bodily injury,” did assault, strike, &c.
There was very slight evidence, if any, of premeditation, but much more that there was inflicted a serious bodily injury on the person assaulted.
*415The court charged the jury that they might find the defendant guilty of an aggravated assault and battery if he inflicted a serious bodily injury on the party assaulted, which was not alleged as a ground of aggravation in the indictment.
This charge was erroneous, because it enabled the jury to find, and from the evidence it may be concluded most likely did cause them to find, the defendant guilty of an aggravated assault and battery on a ground which was not set forth in the indictment. And from the pertinency of this erroneous charge to the evidence it cannot be regarded as an abstraction, not affecting the trial of the cause.
This being an error sufficient to reverse the case it will be unnecessary to notice other less important matters complained of.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.