Court Opinion

ID: 46049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:51:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:03.235636
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 10, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                             No. 05-40127
                           Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY J. PEACOCK,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:03-CR-392-6
                      --------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel for Billy J. Peacock has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967).    Peacock has not filed a response.    Our review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.