Court Opinion

ID: 9365120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 21:00:21.335506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.299834
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6949      Doc: 9        Filed: 01/20/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-6949

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        TYRELL DEVON LEWIS,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
        Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cr-00306-WO-1)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 20, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Tyrell Devon Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6949      Doc: 9         Filed: 01/20/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Tyrell Devon Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order

        granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States

        v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct.

        383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse

        its discretion in analyzing the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v.

        High, 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021). We therefore affirm the district court’s order.

        United States v. Lewis, No. 1:19-cr-00306-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2022). We deny

        Lewis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

        legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

        would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

                                                      2