Court Opinion

ID: 9592672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:16:12.794584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:58.885025
License: Public Domain

FINE, J.
{concurring). I join in the majority decision, but write separately to point out the following:
1. On page 11, the maj ority writes:
The supreme court, however, did not end its discussion of § 767.23(3)(a), Stats., on the above point. The court addressed in dictum the applicability of § 767.23(3)(a) to situations similar to the one presented to us in the principal case, but in which the attorney continued to represent the divorce client.
(Emphasis added.) I do not understand how you can have a "situation! ] similar to the one presented to us in the principal case," which turns on the withdrawal of attorneys with requisite consent of the trial court, "but in which the attorney continued to represent the divorce client."