Court Opinion

ID: 9829626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:29:14.622836+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:03.646701
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In the original opinion we inadvertently referred to the northwest corner of the 'Silas Smith survey as the beginning comer. This reference we here correct. The field notes of the Smith survey are given in full in Steusoff v. Jackson, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 328, 89 S. W. 445, referred to by us in the original opinion.
In his motion for rehearing, appellant complains of the disposition made by us of his second, third, fifth, and sixth assignments. We state in our original opinion that these assignments are too general and fail to specify distinctly the grounds of error relied on. However, we did dispose of the' second and third assignments, and also of the sixth, and in the general disposition of the case we disposed of the fifth assignment. In view of his motion, we would add to our discussion of these assignments that, notwithstanding the manner in which they are .briefed, we have carefully reviewed them and overrule same.
The motion for rehearing is in all things overruled.