Court Opinion

ID: 7817540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:41:25.627778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:38.520244
License: Public Domain

John A. Fogleman, Justice, dissenting. I agree that this case must be reversed and remanded. I do not agree that it is necessary that a new trial be granted to appellant automatically upon remand. After appellant testified, the trial court disposed of this case on its own motion, much as if the matter were before it on a demurrer to evidence. Appellant had corroborating witnesses to offer. The state was not given any opportunity to offer testimony contradicting appellant. The State of Arkansas, as a party in these cases, is not just the prosecuting attorney and the law enforcement officers. It is the people of the state. They, too, are entitled to a day in court. I would remand this case with directions that the State of Arkansas have the option of further hearing on the motion or a new trial. If the state elected further consideration of the motion, then appellant should be first permitted to offer any other competent evidence he desires, after which the state should offer its evidence. I am authorized to state that Brown, J., joins in this dissent.