Court Opinion

ID: 998084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:06:00.027396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:07.526509
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7345

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LOFTON HOWARD LAMBERT, III,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CR-93-5)

Submitted:   February 25, 1999              Decided:   March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lofton Howard Lambert, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lofton Howard Lambert, III, appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to correct sentence.   We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Lambert, No. CA-93-5 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 1998).   We

deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel.    We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2