Court Opinion

ID: 9799598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 07:22:35.983827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:02.561392
License: Public Domain

DANIEL E. SCOTT, J.
I would reverse the $3,145 awarded to Buyers for renting a washer and dryer by the week for some 17 months, and remand for further proceedings on that issue.7 Cases cited by the principal opinion (and cases cited in those cases) do not persuade me that Sellers have waived their well-based complaint that this award was improperly calculated and excessive. I concur in the principal opinion in all other respects.

. See Cason v. King, 327 S.W.3d 543, 554 & n. 12 (Mo.App.2010); Boyd v. Lollar, 985 S.W.2d 403, 406 (Mo.App.1999). Thus, and purely as a procedural preference, I also would have the trial court make the other reductions indicated by, the principal opinion, as opposed to this court doing so under Rule 84.14.