Court Opinion

ID: 8043672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:46:07.302565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:24.790060
License: Public Domain

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this case, the district court correctly determined, contrary to appellant’s contention, that probable cause was established at the preliminary examination to show that embezzlement had been committed by appellant. NRS 205.300; NRS 171.206; State v. Trolson, 21 Nev. 419, 32 P. 930 (1893). See State v. *121Monahan, 50 Nev. 27, 249 P. 566 (1926) and State v. Compton, 450 P.2d 79 (Idaho 1969).
Affirmed.