Court Opinion

ID: 5999659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:47:41.01019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:14.137386
License: Public Domain

Contrary to the defendant husband’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding counsel fees to the plaintiff wife (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879; Brennen v Brennen, 148 AD2d 487; Cotton v Cotton, 147 AD2d 436; Stern v Stern, 67 AD2d 253). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.