Court Opinion

ID: 1009558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:58:03.429522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:33:36.668444
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7450

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

BRIGIDO ALVARENGA,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.  Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CR-00-5, CA-02-70-1)

Submitted:   January 16, 2003             Decided:   January 23, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brigido Alvarenga, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Assistant
United States Attorney, Thomas Richard Ascik, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Brigido Alvarenga seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Alvarenga has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States

v. Alvarenga, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-02-70-1 (W.D.N.C. July 15, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2