Court Opinion

ID: 5543503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:54:10.533447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:52.253758
License: Public Domain

Freedman, J.
The record contains no exception to any refusal to charge, and the exceptions taken to the matters charged are so general as to raise no question for review. The testimony of the plaintiff made out a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the defendant, and the testimony given by and on behalf of the defendant did no more than to create a conflict which had to be submitted to the jury. The motions of the defendant for a dismissal of the complaint, made at the close of plaintiff’s ease and at the close of the testimony on both sides, were therefore properly denied. Under all the circumstances the verdict of the jury cannot be disturbed. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, C. J., concurs.