Court Opinion

ID: 4050760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 01:22:34.880568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:11.598664
License: Public Domain

In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                        Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
                                 ________________________

                                      No. 07-15-00285-CR
                                 ________________________

                                JIMMY ZAVALA, APPELLANT

                                                 V.

                             THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                          On Appeal from the 137th District Court
                                 Lubbock County, Texas
      Trial Court No. 2012-433,926; Honorable John J. "Trey" McClendon III, Presiding

                                          August 3, 2015

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION
                     Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

      In 2012, Appellant, Jimmy Zavala, was convicted of evading arrest or detention

with a vehicle, a state jail felony,1 in cause number 2012-433,926. He was sentenced to

two years confinement, suspended in favor of community supervision for three years.

      1
          TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04 (West Supp. 2014).
       On April 28, 2015, the trial court entered a judgment revoking Appellant's

community supervision and assessing the original sentence of two years confinement.

The trial court entered a Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal indicating Appellant

has a right of appeal, and counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal. No

motion for new trial was filed. On July 6, 2015, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We

dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a

notice of appeal is not timely filed, a court of appeals has no option but to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id. When, as here, a motion for new trial was not filed,

the notice of appeal was required to be filed within thirty days after the day Appellant's

sentence was imposed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The deadline could have been

extended if, within fifteen days of the deadline, Appellant had filed the notice with the

trial court clerk and had also filed a motion for extension of time in compliance with Rule

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. This court has no authority to invoke Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure to enlarge the time in which to file a notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 2;

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

       The judgment in this appeal reflects that Appellant's sentence was imposed on

April 28, 2015. The notice of appeal was, therefore, due by May 28, 2015. Even

applying the fifteen-day extension period under Rule 26.3, the last possible date to file

the notice with a motion for extension of time was June 12, 2015. Thus, Appellant’s

notice of appeal filed on July 6, 2015, falls outside that deadline. Appellant's untimely

                                             2
filed notice of appeal prevents this court from acquiring jurisdiction over this appeal.2

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

        2
         Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2013).

                                                     3