Court Opinion

ID: 9792668
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:33:55.686406+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:44.570151
License: Public Domain

McCOMB, J., Dissenting.
I dissent. In my opinion the errors which the majority opinion concedes were made by the trial court are prejudicial and do not fall within the purview of article VI, section 4%, of the Constitution of California. Therefore, I conclude that the judgments should he reversed.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on January 4, 1940.
Appellant’s petition to recall remittitur and for a rehearing was denied by the District Court of Appeal on January 18, 1940; and his petition to recall remittitur and to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 15, 1940.