Court Opinion

ID: 995465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:37:54.546462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:54.063615
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CLAY MARSHALL CURTIS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-21, CA-97-191-R)

Submitted:   June 18, 1998                  Decided:   July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clay Marshall Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OF-
FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Curtis, Nos. CR-93-21; CA-97-191-R (W.D.

Va. Mar. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2