Court Opinion

ID: 4237174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-17 20:21:58.549291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:39.651260
License: Public Domain

Matter of Ackridge v Warhit (2018 NY Slip Op 00285)

Matter of Ackridge v Warhit

2018 NY Slip Op 00285

Decided on January 17, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 17, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-08597	DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Ronald Ackridge, petitioner,
vBarry Warhit, etc., et al., respondents.

Ronald Ackridge, Mount Vernon, NY, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from continuing with the prosecution of the petitioner in a criminal action entitled People v Ackridge , pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Indictment No. 16-143, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348, 352).
The petitioner has failed to establish a clear legal right to the relief sought.
HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court