Court Opinion

ID: 3121979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:17:14.591708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:17.364759
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                 EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                      EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                  §
                                                                  No. 08-10-00059-CR
                                                  §
 IN RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS                                  AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                                                  §
 RELATOR.                                                           IN MANDAMUS
                                                  §

                                                 §

                                           OPINION

       Relator, The State of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Alejandro (Alex) Gonzalez, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 4, complaining of the trial

court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. We conditionally grant the

mandamus.

       On February 13, 2008, Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Garcia pled guilty to possession of

marijuana and was sentenced to one day in county jail. Approximately one year later, while in

federal custody on removal proceedings, Rodriguez-Garcia filed an application for writ of habeas

corpus, attacking his state conviction on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. A hearing

was set on the matter for February 22, 2010. Prior to that hearing, Rodriguez-Garcia filed a

motion for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, which requested the state

court to order his release from federal custody for the purposes of appearing at a hearing on his

habeas-corpus application. The trial court issued the writ ad testificandum. Subsequently, the

district attorney filed a motion to vacate the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum in light of our

previous decisions in In re State, No. 08-09-00181-CR, 2010 WL 335630, *3 (Tex.App.--El Paso
Jan. 29, 2010, orig. proceeding)(not designated for publication), and In re State, No. 08-10-

00038-CR, — S.W.3d —, 2010 WL 144040, *3 (Tex.App.--El Paso Jan. 13, 2010, orig.

proceeding)(not yet reported).

        We recently held that while a state court may entertain a hearing on an applicant’s

habeas-corpus application filed under Chapter 11 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, it

has no authority to compel an inmate’s release from federal custody for purposes of attending

that hearing. See In re State, 2010 WL 335630 at *3; In re State, 2010 WL 144040 at *3. Based

on our recent decisions, we conditionally grant the Relator’s request for mandamus relief on the

trial court’s order issuing a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. We are confident the trial

court will vacate the order in accordance with this opinion, and the writ will issue only if the trial

court fails to do so.

February 19, 2010
                                               DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

                                                 -2-