Court Opinion

ID: 9759559
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 00:19:52.576766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:07:16.592227
License: Public Domain

DISSENT ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Dec. 2, 1992.
DOGGETT, Justice.
In its further writing on rehearing, the majority has failed to address the most far-reaching of the misinterpretations reflected in its previous writing. One of these is the majority’s turn away from broad form submission which has unfortunately become part of a broad scale abandonment of this principle. See H.E.B. Grocery Co. v. Warner, 845 S.W.2d 258, 260 (Tex.1992) (Mauzy, J., dissenting); State Dept. of Highways & Pub. Transp. v. Payne, 838 S.W.2d 235, 241 (Tex.1992) (Mauzy, J., dissenting); Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262, 268 (Tex.1992) (Mauzy, J., dissenting).
MAUZY, J., joins in this dissent on motion for rehearing.