Court Opinion

ID: 997906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:03:40.590481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:35.048911
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7665

JAMES A. BUTLER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MARK A. HENRY, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-98-1810-WMN)

Submitted:   February 11, 1999         Decided:     February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Copperthite, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.    We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.    See Butler v. Henry, No. CA-98-1810-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 28,

1998).*   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
October 27, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on October 28, 1998. Pursuant to Rules
58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the
date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as
the effecive date of the district court’s decision.      Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                  2