Court Opinion

ID: 3502772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:09:37.191081+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:07.708776
License: Public Domain

A verdict was directed sustaining the *Page 343 
will of Mrs. Maria Saunders, and judgment was entered thereon.
Contestants have six assignments of error. They present one meritorious question, that the evidence adduced made issues of fact of testamentary capacity and of undue influence. The evidence on the first claimed issue was that Mrs. Saunders, a strong-willed, vigorous, capable woman, believed in and practiced spiritualism and had confidence in spiritualistic communications. This was not evidence of insanity.O'Dell v. Goff, 149 Mich. 152 (10 L.R.A. [N. S.] 989, 119 Am. St. Rep. 662).
Upon the other claimed issue there is evidence to the effect that testatrix was at times comforted and at other times disturbed by her belief in such communications, and some evidence that she sought spiritualistic counsel relative to her will. But there is no evidence that she had such extraordinary confidence in such communications, whether received through a medium or directly, as she believed, that she was impelled to follow them blindly, that her free agency was destroyed, that the will resulted from such influences rather than from the exercise of her own mind, that it was not her will. This question is fully considered in the O'Dell Case and what is there said need not be repeated. The trial judge was right in holding that the evidence raised no question of fact for the jury.
Other matter presented by the assignments does not merit discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
BIRD, C.J., and SHARPE, SNOW, STEERE, FELLOWS, WIEST, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred. *Page 344