Court Opinion

ID: 3843872
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:12:39.411693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:46:41.636186
License: Public Domain

Before the court on decisive demurrer.
Decision for plaintiff rendered January 25, 1965.
This is a suit to set aside State Tax Commission's Opinion and Order No. I-64-14, which affirmed defendant's deficiency assessment against plaintiffs for additional income tax for the year 1961. The case is before the court on demurrer and a decision on the demurrer will be decisive.
Plaintiffs realized gains from the sale of corporate stock on July 31, 1961. These gains were used to pay for the construction of a fixed, permanent swimming pool on their personal residence tract. The plaintiffs sought special capital gains treatment for income tax purposes of the gains expended, on grounds that this was an investment in real property that qualified for the treatment under ORS 316.420(1)(a). The State Tax Commission denied the special treatment on the grounds that a purchase of a personal residence is *Page 82 
not a qualifying investment in real property under ORS316.420(1)(a).
1. This court has held in two prior cases that an investment in a personal residence is an investment in real property that qualifies under ORS 316.420(1)(a) and is therefore entitled to the special capital gains treatment. See Christianson v.Commission, 2 Or. Tax 43 (1964); reversed 240 Or. 504, 402 P.2d 743
(1965) and Jayne v. Commission, 2 Or. Tax 65 (1965). Therefore, it is the court's decision that defendant's additional assessment will be set aside.
Plaintiff shall prepare a form of decree setting aside defendant's assessment, without costs to either party. *Page 83