Court Opinion

ID: 2923993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:54:45.97627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:43.159794
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-295-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

ACCUTEST SERVICES, INC.,	Appellant,

v.

JOHN BERT DAHL, ET AL.,	Appellees.
___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court 
of Nueces County, Texas
___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, ACCUTEST SERVICES, INC., attempted to perfect an appeal from a
judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause
number 06-2768-B.  Judgment in this cause was signed on March 9, 2007.  No timely
motion for new trial was filed.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice
of appeal was due on April 9, 2007, but was not filed until May 10, 2007.  
	Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the
defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected
within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be
dismissed.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellant's failure to timely perfect its appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this
Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
							PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 28th day of June, 2007.