Court Opinion

ID: 149838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-06-30 18:04:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:15.297360
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 10-6384

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

RONALD WENDELL DOBY,

                Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:08-cr-00029-HEH-1)

Submitted:   June 24, 2010                 Decided:   June 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Wendell Doby, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

               Ronald Wendell Doby appeals the district court’s order

denying Doby’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence.       We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.        United States v. Doby, No. 3:08-cr-00029-HEH-1

(E.D.    Va.    Feb.   26,   2010).   We   dispense   with   oral   argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                      2