Court Opinion

ID: 3679270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:25:04.499457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:14.773778
License: Public Domain

This is an action to recover for 43,187 feet of lumber at $22 per 1,000 feet, delivered by plaintiffs to defendant, and accepted by them. To the complaint the defendants set up a counterclaim for breach of contract in failing to manufacture lumber of certain timber, and asking judgment for $13,938.66 damages. The court sustained the demurrer of plaintiffs to the counterclaim, and the defendant appealed. *Page 726 
The court having sustained a demurrer to the counterclaim, the defendant appealed, and asks this Court to reverse the judgment sustaining the demurrer on the counterclaim, and that a jury trial may then be had on the counterclaim. There was no verdict or judgment upon the plaintiffs' cause of action, and no judgment as to the costs. This Court has uniformly adhered to its ruling that it will not entertain a fragmentary appeal.
The whole subject was recently fully discussed with the fullest citation of authorities, and upon the reason of the thing, at last term, in CementCo. v. Phillips, 182 N.C. 439, citing very numerous authorities.
That decision was cited with approval at last term by Adams, J., in Farrv. Lumber Co., 182 N.C. 727; and also in Leroy v. Saliba, ibid., 757.
The rules of practice are well settled, and well known to the profession, and are based upon the soundest reasons in the dispatch of the public business by the courts, and a slight attention to them would avoid such inadvertences as in this instance.
Appeal dismissed.