Court Opinion

ID: 2706120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-04 22:44:49.43911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:21.895701
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Dowey, 2012-Ohio-1167.]

STATE OF OHIO                    )                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                 )ss:                  NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SUMMIT                 )

STATE OF OHIO                                          C.A. No.        25963

        Appellee

        v.                                             APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
                                                       ENTERED IN THE
COREY W. DOWEY                                         BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT
                                                       COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO
        Appellant                                      CASE No.   CRB1100681

                                 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Dated: March 21, 2012

        DICKINSON, Judge.

                                            INTRODUCTION

        {¶1}    Following a trial to the bench, a Barberton Municipal Court judge found Corey

Dowey guilty of domestic violence. Mr. Dowey has appealed, arguing that the judge failed to

properly ascertain whether he had knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to

counsel and used the incorrect standard of proof in determining his guilt. We affirm because Mr.

Dowey failed to provide this Court with a transcript of the trial proceedings.

                                  TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

        {¶2}    Mr. Dowey’s first assignment of error is that the municipal court judge did not

properly inquire whether he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily refused the assistance of

counsel. His second assignment of error is that the judge applied an incorrect standard of proof.

Both of his assignments refer to errors that the trial judge allegedly made at trial.
                                                 2

       {¶3}    It is an appellant’s duty to ensure that a transcript of proceedings is transmitted to

the appellate court for review. App. R. 10(A); Loc. R. 5(A). “When portions of the transcript

which are necessary to resolve assignments of error are not included in the record on appeal, the

reviewing court has ‘no choice but to presume the validity of the [trial] court’s proceedings, and

affirm.’” City of Cuyahoga Falls v. James, 9th Dist. No. 21119, 2003-Ohio-531, at ¶ 9 (quoting

Knapp v. Edwards Labs., 61 Ohio St. 2d 197, 199 (1980)).

       {¶4}    Several days after the trial, the municipal court entered an order directing the

court reporter to prepare a transcript of the proceedings. It does not appear from the record that a

transcript was ever prepared. “This Court has repeatedly held that it is the duty of the appellant

to ensure that the record on appeal is complete.” Riggle v. McFadden, 9th Dist. No. 08CA0007,

2008-Ohio-5656, at ¶ 5 (quoting Lunato v. Stevens Painton Corp., 9th Dist. No. 08CA009318,

2008-Ohio-3206, at ¶ 11). Appellate Rule 10(A) specifically directs an appellant to “comply

with the provisions of [Appellate] Rule 9(B) and . . . take any other action necessary to enable

the clerk to assemble and transmit the record.” Mr. Dowey did not ensure that the transcript of

proceedings was prepared and filed or pursue alternatives under Appellate Rule 9(C) and (D)

before the deadline for transmission of the record under Appellate Rule 10(B). Accordingly, we

are unable to review the merits of his assigned errors.

       {¶5}    Because the record does not contain a transcript of the proceedings, this Court is

unable to review whether the municipal court properly determined that Mr. Dowey knowingly,

intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel or applied the incorrect standard of

proof. Mr. Dowey’s assignments of error are overruled.
                                                 3

                                         CONCLUSION

       {¶6}    Because the record does not contain a copy of the trial transcript, this Court must

presume regularity. The judgment of the Barberton Municipal Court is affirmed.

                                                                                Judgment affirmed.

       There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

       We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Barberton

Municipal Court, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A

certified copy of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.

       Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of

judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the

period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(C). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is

instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the

mailing in the docket, pursuant to App.R. 30.

       Costs taxed to Appellant.

                                                     CLAIR E. DICKINSON
                                                     FOR THE COURT

WHITMORE, P. J.
BELFANCE, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

KAREN H. BROUSE, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

HOLLY REESE, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.