Court Opinion

ID: 3077046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:23:39.874175+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:42:02.355762
License: Public Domain

In The

                               Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                           ____________________
                              NO. 09-12-00344-CR
                           ____________________

     JON M. WALECKI A/K/A JON MICHAEL WALECKI, Appellant

                                        V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________            ______________

                   On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                          Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. 11-11749
________________________________________________________            _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Jon M. Walecki pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to burglary of a

building. The trial court placed him on deferred adjudication community

supervision. Walecki violated the conditions of his community supervision. The

State filed a motion to revoke. The trial court revoked the supervision, adjudicated

guilt, and sentenced Walecki to two years of confinement in the state jail.

      Walecki’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes that there are no arguable grounds for

                                         1
appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493

(1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted

an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. Walecki filed a

response.

      We have reviewed the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, the Anders brief,

and the pro se response. We agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable

issues support an appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

      AFFIRMED.

                                      ________________________________
                                              DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                    Justice

Submitted on April 30, 2013
Opinion Delivered May 8, 2013
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

                                        2