Court Opinion

ID: 9724601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 11:04:01.53469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:02.916977
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam
(on motion for rehearing). The defendant-respondent requests that the court rule upon his motion for review made pursuant to sec. 274.12, Stats. The motions after verdict made by respondent and presented to the trial court, excepting the motion for a new trial in the interest of justice, were overruled by the trial court without memorandum opinion. These motions, in the main, contend that plaintiff was negligent as a matter of law as to lookout, and that this being so the answers to negligence and comparative-negligence questions could not stand. If the language of the opinion does not clearly reflect our opinion on these questions, let it now be said that the court in conference thoroughly considered the liability questions as presented by the motion to review. We were then, and are now, of the opinion that there was credible evidence to sustain the jury’s conclusion that plaintiff was not negligent as to lookout or otherwise and that the verdict as to the liability features should be approved.
The motion for rehearing is denied without costs.