Court Opinion

ID: 9375331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-27 16:00:48.139921+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:57.928025
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10817        Document: 00516655147             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/24/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 22-10817
                                    Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                    ____________                              February 24, 2023
                                                                                Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                         Clerk

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Jordan Thomas Kettle,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 2:21-CR-114-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jordan Thomas
   Kettle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Kettle has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10817    Document: 00516655147          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/24/2023

                                  No. 22-10817

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2