Court Opinion

ID: 9894769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-02 20:01:17.44971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:33.949062
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11379    Document: 31-1     Date Filed: 11/02/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11379
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       ANDREW BRAVO JIMENEZ,
       a.k.a. DROOPY,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Georgia
                 D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00045-CAR-CHW-4
USCA11 Case: 22-11379     Document: 31-1     Date Filed: 11/02/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                     Opinion of the Court                22-11379

                           ____________________

       Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              John Jay McArthur, appointed counsel for Andrew
       Bravo-Jimenez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with-
       draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
       pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ-
       ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
       the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
       examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
       merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jimenez’s
       conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.