Court Opinion

ID: 9530866
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:04:39.213266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:16.428568
License: Public Domain

*863GARRARD, Presiding Judge,
concurring in result.
When an arrest is made upon probable cause and in a public place, federal constitutional law does not impose an “exigent circumstances” requirement concerning the securing of a warrant.
However, the court has recognized the potential existence of an issue where such an arrest is made upon private property.
Appellant’s argument does not urge the public versus private distinction, and as the majority points out, it appears that exigent circumstances, in fact, did exist.
I therefore concur in result without reaching the question of when or whether Indiana imposes an exigent circumstances requirement to justify a warrantless arrest based upon probable cause.