Court Opinion

ID: 1165143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 04:33:20.260529+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:54.608469
License: Public Domain

624 P.2d 644 (1981)
51 Or.App. 201
In the matter of the Compensation of Dianne L. JAMES, Claimant.
Dianne L. James, Respondent,
v.
STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Petitioner.
No. 77-6474; CA 14647.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted on Remand January 20, 1981.
Decided March 9, 1981.
Darrell E. Bewley, Associated Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Salem.
Sidney A. Galton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were David J. Hollander, and Galton, Popick & Scott, Portland.
Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RICHARDSON and GILLETTE,[*] JJ.
Submitted on Remand from Oregon Supreme Court January 20, 1981.
PER CURIAM.
The Supreme Court remanded this case to this court because "* * * there is a fact question whether claimant's condition was caused by circumstances `to which an employee is not ordinarily subjected or exposed other than during a period of regular actual employment.'" James v. SAIF, 290 Or. 343, 351, 624 P.2d 565 (1981).
Because the Supreme Court established a criterion for compensability of an occupational disease different than had been previously applied, the parties may not have adequately presented their case. They should have an opportunity to develop the case consistent with the statutory criterion interpreted by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, we remand the case to the Workers' *645 Compensation Board for a determination of compensability. The Board, as it deems appropriate, may request additional briefing, additional evidence or remand the case to the referee for a further hearing.
Remanded for further proceedings.
NOTES
[*]  Gillette, J., vice Lee, J., deceased.