Court Opinion

ID: 3105317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:45:52.950113+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:35:50.954496
License: Public Domain

02-12-306-CV

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-12-00306-CV
 
 

Samuel
  Okere
 
v.
 
 
Jane
  Okere

§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 

From the 325th District
  Court
 
of
  Tarrant County (325-478978-10)
 
February
  28, 2013
 
Per
  Curiam

JUDGMENT
 
          This
court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the
appeal should be dismissed.  It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed. 
          It
is further ordered that appellant Samuel Okere shall pay all of the costs of
this appeal, for which let execution issue.
 
 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 
 
 
 
PER CURIAM
 
 
 
 
 

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-12-00306-CV
 
 

Samuel Okere

 

APPELLANT

 
V.
 

Jane Okere

 

APPELLEE

 
 
----------
FROM THE 325th
District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1]
----------
          On
November 21, 2012, the parties filed a “Joint Motion To Remand To Trial Court
And To Enter A Clarification Order.”  In the motion, the parties stated that on
November 12, 2012, mediation was conducted, during which the parties signed a
mediated settlement agreement and resolved the issue that was pending in this
appeal.  The parties asked this court to grant their joint motion and to remand
the case to the trial court to clarify its prior order of April 27, 2012, and
to enter a clarification order in accordance with the parties’ mediated
settlement agreement.
On
December 7, 2012, we granted the parties’ “Joint Motion To Remand To Trial
Court And To Enter A Clarification Order” and stated that the appeal would be
automatically reinstated on January 31, 2013, but could be dismissed if no
party filed a motion asking that the appeal continue.  More than ten days have
elapsed since the appeal was reinstated, and no motion has been filed.
Pursuant
to our December 7, 2012 order, we therefore dismiss the appeal.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see also Waldo v. Muhs, No. 02-05-00126-CV,
2006 WL 349707, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 16, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.)
(dismissing appeal after parties failed to file any motions following mediation
that resolved all issues in appeal).
 
 
PER CURIAM
 
PANEL: 
WALKER,
MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
 
DELIVERED:  February 28,
2013

 

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.