Court Opinion

ID: 998722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:15:15.029089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:09.544592
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LACY DAVIS, III, a/k/a Lacey Davis,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-94-411-A)

Submitted:   May 13, 1999                     Decided:   May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacy Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lacy Davis, III, appeals the district court’s denying his

motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Davis, No. CR-94-411-A (Jan. 12,

1999).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2