Court Opinion

ID: 2739576
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-03 04:08:09.956542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:04.976178
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                               FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                        ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:             01-14-00096-CR
Style:                    Johnathan Ross Nickerson
                          v The State of Texas
Date motion filed*:       September 26, 2014
Type of motion:           Motion to extend length of appellant’s brief
Party filing motion:      Appellant
Document to be filed:     Appellant’s brief

If motion to extend time:
       Original due date:
       Number of extensions granted:                    Current Due date:
       Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

             Granted
             Denied
             Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
             Other: _____________________________________
         Appellant requests permission to file a brief that exceeds the permissible word
         limit of 15,000 words by 9,529 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B). We deny
         the motion to exceed the word limit. See id. 9.4(i)(4). We therefore strike
         appellant’s brief and order appellant to file a proper brief, in compliance with the
         rules, within 21 days of the date of this order. See id. 9.4(k).

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack
                   

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 2, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision