Court Opinion

ID: 8449493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:34:33.371685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:57.224530
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Erik D. Henderson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Henderson, No. 1:04-cr-00343-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.