Court Opinion

ID: 8610057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 07:33:22.571539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.890556
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Viktor Matveevich Dekhtyarov, a native and citizen of Ukraine, petitions for review *538of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision that summarily affirmed the ruling of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
Where, as here, the BIA summarily affirms the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency action. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2006). We review for substantial evidence, Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067, 1073 (9th Cir.2004), and we grant the petition and remand.
The IJ denied Dekhtyarov’s asylum claim, finding that there was no nexus between the harm suffered, or the fear of future harm, and Dekhtyarov’s political opinion. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481-82, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). In arriving at this conclusion, the IJ failed to consider Dekhtyarov’s specific contention that he had been persecuted on account of his membership in a particular social group. Because it is the agency’s role to evaluate an applicant’s asylum claim in the first instance, INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam), we remand for proceedings consistent with this disposition.
PETITION GRANTED and REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.