Court Opinion

ID: 9485944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 11:34:15.478816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:27.325006
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The Order and Dissents filed September 24, 1993, as amended October 1, 1993, are designated for publication.
Before: PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to deny appellants’ petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestions for rehearing en banc. An active judge *562requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing are denied and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are rejected.
Judges Reinhardt, Kozinski and Noonan dissent from the failure of the court to rehear the ease en banc. Judge Rymer separately concurs in the decision of the court not to rehear the case en banc.