Court Opinion

ID: 9848708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:25:39.941647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:37.930104
License: Public Domain

D. T. Anderson, J.
(concurring). I concur in the result reached by Judge M. F. Cavanagh, but not in all the reasons therefor.
The minutes of the public meeting of the board of education do not reflect a decision that Dryden was an unsatisfactory teacher as required by stat*50ute and Munro v Elk Rapids Schools, 385 Mich 618; 189 NW2d 224 (1971). An attempted "correction” of the minutes was too late to satisfy the statute.
For reasons stated by the majority opinion in Andersen v Adrian School District Bd of Ed, 73 Mich App 33; 250 NW2d 786 (1976), I cannot agree it is necessary for the minutes of the board of education to contain the reasons for a decision on the unsatisfactory nature of the teacher’s services.