Court Opinion

ID: 7528704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:07:18.055381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:40.633700
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.
We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.