Court Opinion

ID: 9420364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:54:07.492316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:24.461574
License: Public Domain

*749Mr. Justice Burton,
concurring, states that, hpon remand of the cause to the Tax Court, there is nothing in the facts which have been presented here which, as a matter of law, will preclude that court from finding that the 1940 and 1941' income was properly taxable on a partnership basis. The physical absence of some of the Culbertson boys from the ranch does not necessarily preclude them or others from the obligations or the benefits of: the partnership for tax purposes. Their contributions of capital, their participation in the income and their, commitments to return to the ranch or otherwise to render service to the partnership are among the material factors to be considered. A present commitment tó render future services to a partnership is in itself a material consideration to be weighed with all other material considerations for the purposes of taxation as well as for other partnership • purposes.
Mr. Justice Jackson would affirm on the opinion of the court below, being of the view that the ordinary common-law tests of validity of partnerships are the tests for tax purposes and that they were met in this case.