Court Opinion

ID: 4701164
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-05 07:20:36.398236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:16.221900
License: Public Domain

Order filed June 29, 2021.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                  ____________

                             NO. 14-19-00516-CV
                                  ____________

  ANTONIO RUIZ, MARTHA RUIZ, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF 11207
      BAYOU PLACE LANE, HOUSTON, TEXAS, 77099, Appellants

                                       V.

                       INVUM THREE, LLC, Appellee

             On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2
                           Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 1134013

                      ABATEMENT ORDER

      Appellants timely filed their notice of appeal to this court with the county
clerk on June 27, 2019, seeking to appeal the county civil court at law’s judgment
signed on June 17, 2019 in favor of appellee Invum Three, LLC. However, the
notice of appeal states “COMES NOW MARTHA RUIZ, et. al. Defendants in the
above captioned cause and hereby filed this NOTICE OF APPEAL pursuant to
TEX. R. APP. PROC.” The caption on the notice of appeal lists the defendants as
“Antonio Ruiz, Martha Ruiz and all occupants, 11207 Bayou Place Lane Houston,
Tex 77099 The Premises.” Likewise, the docketing statement filed lists the
appellant in this case as “Martha Ruiz” but lists the case style as “Martha Ruiz, et.
al v. Invium Three, LLC.” The other appellate documents filed by appellant(s)
refer to appellant(s) as either “Martha Ruiz, et. al” or “Martha Ruiz and Antonio R.
Ruiz, and All Occupants at 11207 Bayou Place Ln., Houston, Texas 77099.”
      The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure mandate that the notice of appeal
must “state the name of each party filing the notice.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(5).
The notice of appeal filed in this case fails to do so.
      When perfecting an appeal, the factor which determines whether jurisdiction
has been conferred on the appellate court is not the form or substance of the bond,
certificate, or affidavit, but whether the instrument was filed in a bona fide attempt
to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Warwick Towers Council of Co-
Owners ex rel. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Park Warwick, L.P., 244 S.W.3d
838, 839 (Tex. 2008) (per curiam). Here, the notice of appeal filed was a bona fide
attempt to appeal, and therefore, we conclude that we have jurisdiction over the
appeal and that appellant(s) are permitted to amend the notice in order that the
merits of the appeal are addressed to the correct appellant(s). See id.
      Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and order the appellant(s) to file an
amended notice of appeal stating the name of each party filing the notice. See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.1(d)(5), (g); Warwick Towers, 244 S.W.3d at 839. The amended
notice of appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before July 26,
2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(g) (providing for an amended notice of appeal to
correct “a defect or omission”).
      The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the
amended notice of appeal is received by the Clerk of this Court. The Court will
also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or
the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.
      It is so ORDERED.

                                       PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.