Court Opinion

ID: 7797023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-02 13:00:25.395558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:33.437942
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-14368      Date Filed: 08/02/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-14368
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODERICK DEON COLE,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Northern District of Alabama
          D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cr-00409-AMM-GMB-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-14368        Date Filed: 08/02/2022     Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                21-14368

Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Roger Appell, counsel for Roderick Cole in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw
is GRANTED, and Cole’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.