Court Opinion

ID: 2953706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 23:25:15.476126+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:52.634066
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00440-CR

William Dewayne Boone, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 391ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-09-0754-SB, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

		Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right
to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
		We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See
Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
		We note, however, that the judgment of conviction orders appellant to pay court costs,
with the notation "SEE ATTACHED BILL OF COST[S]."  While a defendant's inability to pay does
not bar the imposition of court costs, the bill of costs in this case includes appointed attorney's fees
in the amount of $500.  See Green v. State, No. 03-09-00718-CFR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8153,
at *20-22 (Tex. App.--Austin Oct. 8, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 
Before ordering a defendant to pay appointed attorney's fees, a trial court must determine that the
defendant has financial resources enabling him to offset the cost of the legal services provided.  See
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2010).  The record contains no determination
by the trial court that appellant has financial resources enabling him to pay attorney's fees.  The
record further reflects that the trial court found appellant indigent and appointed counsel to represent
him at trial and again on appeal.  We find no factual basis in the record to support a determination
that appellant is capable of paying the ordered attorney's fees.  See Anderson v. State,
No. 03-09-00630-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 5033, at *6 (Tex. App.--Austin July 1, 2010, no pet.)
(mem. op., not designated for publication) (requiring factual basis in record to support determination
that defendant is capable of paying attorney's fees).  Accordingly, we modify the judgment of
conviction to state that appellant is to pay court costs as reflected in the bill of costs, minus the $500
attributed to appointed attorney's fees.  See Haney v. State, No. 07-09-0205-CR, 2010 Tex. App.
LEXIS 7229, at *2 (Tex. App.--Amarillo Sept. 1, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication) (modifying judgment by deleting order to pay attorney's fees before affirming
conviction in frivolous appeal under Anders).   	
		The judgment of conviction is affirmed as modified.
 

						__________________________________________
						Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin
Modified, and as Modified, Affirmed
Filed:   July 28, 2011
Do Not Publish