Court Opinion

ID: 9385791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-09 08:12:01.377882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:38.239869
License: Public Domain

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April
4, 2023.

                                  In The

                  Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                             NO. 14-23-00212-CV

       IN RE DEBRA V. JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, THE LAW OFFICE OF
   DEBRA JENNINGS, PLLC; AND LANEASE DICKENS-FULLER,
INDIVIDUALLY AS AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE,
           LAW OFFICE OF LANEASE FULLER, Relators

                        ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                          WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                             Probate Court No 3
                            Harris County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 504,405-401

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

     On April 3, 2023, relators Debra V. Jennings, Individually and as
Representative for her Law Practice, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC;
and Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for her Law
Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller filed a petition for writ of mandamus as
well as an emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this
Court to compel the Honorable Jason Cox, presiding judge of the Probate Court No
3 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 24, 2023 order to account and
extending temporary injunction.

       Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, all
pending motions are denied as moot.

                                      PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

                                         2