Court Opinion

ID: 2864376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:02:06.610169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:48:46.338123
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00680-CR

Glenn A. Miller, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 44,754, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

After accepting appellant Glenn A. Miller's plea of guilty to aggravated sexual
assault, the district court deferred further proceedings without adjudicating guilt and placed
appellant on community supervision.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2001). 
The court subsequently revoked supervision, adjudged appellant guilty, and imposed sentence of
imprisonment for six years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d
137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				                                                                        

				Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed:   February 8, 2001

Do Not Publish