Court Opinion

ID: 5837177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 22:42:05.120763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:39.103071
License: Public Domain

an action to recover damages for the alleged illegal use by defendants of "confidentially disclosed ideas and invention”, defendants Sterndent Corporation and Milton Solomon appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 8, 1979, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment *591dismissing plaintiffs complaint to the extent that it seeks damages in excess of $5,000. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, the branch of appellants’ motion which seeks summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety is granted, and the action is severed and the complaint is dismissed as to them. Although there is an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff made the alleged January, 1968 disclosure, the evidence establishes as a matter of law: (1) that plaintiffs idea and device were not novel; (2) that in any case they became part of the public domain by virtue of the subsequent Gibson and Alessi patents and the Ishikawa article (see Platzman v American Totalisator Co., 45 NY2d 910); (3) that Sterndent’s device is demonstrably different from plaintiffs; and (4) that Sterndent (Weber) did not appropriate plaintiffs idea or device. We find that close examination of the Park French, Kenneth Roll and Warren A. Sklar affidavits—and the documentation annexed thereto—clearly demonstrates that plaintiffs contentions herein as to the novelty, public domain and appropriation issues have no evidentiary support and that summary judgment must be granted. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.