Court Opinion

ID: 6342270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-19 17:02:05.154263+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.310468
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 21-099V
                                          UNPUBLISHED

    HANNAH GAMMONS,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                            Filed: April 1, 2022
    v.
                                                                Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Meningococcal Vaccine; Shoulder
                                                                Injury Related to Vaccine
                         Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                 DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

        On January 5, 2021, a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”), was filed on
behalf of Hannah Gammons, who was at the time a minor. Upon reaching the age of
majority, this case was ordered re-captioned to reflect Hannah Gammons as the sole
petitioner. ECF No. 26.

      Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a meningococcal vaccine that was administered
to her on November 2, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       On April 1, 2022, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
compensation for SIRVA. On March 31, 2022, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4
report/proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be
awarded $46,561.40 (comprised of $45,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,561.40 for
past unreimbursed expenses). Rule 4/Proffer at 4. In the Rule 4/Proffer, Respondent
represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a
whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 4/Proffer.

       Pursuant to the terms stated in the Rule4/Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum
payment of $46,561.40 (comprised of $45,000.00 for pain and suffering an $1,561.40
for past unreimbursed expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section
15(a).

       The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                                 s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                                 Brian H. Corcoran
                                                                 Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                    2