Court Opinion

ID: 9353014
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-10 19:00:50.250519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:51.936993
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-20240     Document: 00516604385         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/10/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                      Fifth Circuit

                                  No. 22-20240                      FILED
                                Summary Calendar             January 10, 2023
                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                    Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Elan Douglas,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:17-CR-353-1

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elan Douglas has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Douglas has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-20240     Document: 00516604385          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/10/2023

                                   No. 22-20240

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2