Court Opinion

ID: 4166222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-05-04 17:16:35.90516+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:56.257693
License: Public Domain

People v Santiago (2017 NY Slip Op 03623)

People v Santiago

2017 NY Slip Op 03623

Decided on May 4, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 4, 2017

Richter, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Feinman, Kapnick, JJ.

3927 4314N/11 4247N/11 3926

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
v Epifanio Santiago, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren J. Springer of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel Conviser, J.), rendered July 1, 2014, and July 29, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MAY 4, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.