Court Opinion

ID: 4019558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-28 04:15:31.066657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:05.177491
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 27, 2016

                                     NO. 03-15-00490-CR

                                    Ernest Perez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

          APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
              BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 27, 2016

                                     NO. 03-15-00491-CR

                                    Ernest Perez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

          APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
              BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.