Court Opinion

ID: 1020272
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:48:48.958295+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:25.188913
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 06-7003

TORRANCE CAPREE MIMS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00200)

Submitted: August 24, 2006                 Decided: September 1, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Torrance Capree Mims, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Torrance Capree Mims appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.    We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   Mims v. North

Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00200 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2006).    We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -