Court Opinion

ID: 992880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:59:14.242657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:52.787049
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-7302

RICHARD R. MCCLEARY,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

EARL D. BESHEARS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                             Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
96-1572-S)

Submitted:   August 5, 1997                 Decided:   August 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard R. McCleary, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. McCleary v. Beshears, No. CA-96-1572-S (D.
Md. July 30, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2