Court Opinion

ID: 8047271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:00:46.136442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:32.975262
License: Public Domain

Bartlett, J.
As the agreement between Kinsley H. and Clark G. Batchelder was never executed, it did not auiount to a payment or ex-tinguishment of the note in suit. Folsom v. Plumer, 43 N. H. 471; Carey v. Bancroft, 14 Pick. 317; Rochester v. Whitehouse, 15 N. H. 473. The plaintiff cannot be estopped to deny the execution of that agreement, as he was in no way party to it or informed of it, nor indeed does the defendant appear to'have been. The defendant’s exception must therefore be overruled.