Court Opinion

ID: 7425073
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:46:48.486825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:23.759676
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
*325Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
DREW, J., dissents.