Court Opinion

ID: 2965274
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:38:07.345049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:50.701822
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

[Not for Publication]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
____________________
                                   No. 97-9010

                  IN RE:  NANCY M. OLIVER ECHEVARRIA,

                                Debtor.

                         _____________________

DORAL MORTGAGE CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

NANCY M. OLIVER ECHEVARRIA, ET AL.,

Appellees.

____________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

Before

 Torruella, Chief Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Stahl, Circuit Judge.

____________________

                                       Ronald L. Rosenbaum and Woods & Rosenbaum on brief for appellants.
                         ____________________
March 31, 1998
                                     ____________________    Per curiam.  We have carefully considered appellant's arguments, yet we see in them no basis for disturbing the conclusions of the bankruptcy appellate panel.  As we have noted on countless occasions: "[W]hen a lower court produces a comprehensive, well-reasoned decision, an appellate court should refrain from writing at length to no other end than to hear its own words resonate."  Sunview Condominium Assoc. v. Flexel Int'l, Ltd., 116 F.3d 962, 965 (1st Cir. 1997) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).  So it is here.
      Affirmed.  No costs.