Court Opinion

ID: 8640639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:58:25.043358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:05.344448
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
David Ledezma Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re*562view of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)). Petitioner’s conclusory allegation that his deportation proceedings constituted a due process violation does not constitute a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.