Court Opinion

ID: 9827567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 17:40:03.149741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:33.400997
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In its motion for rehearing, appellant requests the court to make a number of additional findings of fact, and, in response *529thereto, we further find that appellee, on the occasion of the collision of his automobile with appellant’s street car, at the intersection of Page and Zangs streets, was familiar with this intersection and the conditions obtaining at such intersection, having passed over the intersection from once to twice a day for the preceding two years, and knew the location of the street car track, and also that street cars were operated thereon.
The request for other additional findings is not complied with, for the reason that they are either not considered material to the questions involved, or are mere deductions drawn from some of the witnesses. The motion for rehearing has been carefully considered, and is overruled.
' Overruled.