Court Opinion

ID: 537996
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:23+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:02.619243
License: Public Domain

898 F.2d 144Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Warden WINEBRENNER, E.C.I., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 89-7203.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Nov. 29, 1989.Decided:  Feb. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-415-B)
William Banks, appellant pro se.
Ronald Mark Levitan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
William Banks appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Banks v. Winebrenner, CA-89-415-B (D.Md. Sept. 20, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.