Court Opinion

ID: 9645830
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:36:32.686417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:32.112941
License: Public Domain

Clifford, J.
(concurring). My vote to affirm signifies no more than my agreement with the Court’s interpretation of France v. A.P.A. Transport Corp., 56 N. J. 500 (1970), as including the allowance of suits by a parent against an unemancipated minor child for the cause of action referred to in that opinion. I do not, at this point in this interlocutory proceeding, intimate any view on the underlying policy *72considerations affecting the doctrine of intra-family immunity as expressed in Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp., 27 N. J. 1 (1958); Hastings v. Hastings, 33 N. J. 247 (1960); Heyman v. Gordon, 40 N. J. 52 (1963); Franco v. Davis, 51 N. J. 237 (1968) and Immer v. Risko, 56 N. J. 482 (1970).