Court Opinion

ID: 596797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:22:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:55.776339
License: Public Domain

981 F.2d 1252
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.John Randolph TYSOR, Petitioner-Appellant,v.C. E. KING;  Attorney General of the State of NorthCarolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6811.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 31, 1992Decided:  December 18, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.  Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge.
John Randolph Tysor, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
John Tysor seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Tysor v. King, No. CA-91-561-1 (M.D.N.C. June 17, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED