Court Opinion

ID: 8806728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 14:50:02.319942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:07.858045
License: Public Domain

WALKER, Circuit Judge.
[1, 2] By the judgment presented for review the asserted right of a trustee in bankruptcy to recover property transferred by the bankrupt by a mortgage executed more than four months before the petition in bankruptcy was filed, but recorded within that time, was denied. The averments of the petition did not show that the mortgage was invalid under the law of Texas, in which state it was made. Under the law of that state it was not necessary to record the mortgage to make it valid against creditors other than lien creditors. Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Pipkin Drug Co., 136 Fed. 396, 69 C. C. A. 240. It has been settled by authoritative rulings that under section 47a of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910 (36 Stat. 838, 840), the trustee in bankruptcy takes the status of a lien creditor as of the time the petition in bankruptcy is filed, and that under section 60 of that act, as the same has been amended, such a mortgage as the one in question in this case does not constitute a voidable preference. Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 245 U. S. 513, 38 Sup. Ct. 176, 62 L. Ed. -, January 14, 1918; Carey v. Donohue, 240 U. S. 430; Martin v. Commercial National Bank, 228 Fed. 651, 143 C. C. A. 173. The mortgage was recorded before the right as a lien creditor of any one other than the mortgagee attached, and is not subordinated to the subsequently attaching right of the trustee.
The judgment under review is supported by the rulings mentioned. It is affirmed.