Court Opinion

ID: 9916793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-10 18:01:45.721184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:04.563537
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11399    Document: 21-1     Date Filed: 01/10/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-11399
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       ANTHONY KEELS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 6:22-cr-00154-RBD-EJK-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11399      Document: 21-1      Date Filed: 01/10/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-11399

       Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Charles E. Taylor, Jr., counsel for Anthony Keels in this direct
       criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
       tion of the appellant and ﬁled a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor-
       nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
       ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record
       reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw
       is GRANTED, and Keels’s convictions and sentences are
       AFFIRMED.