Court Opinion

ID: 5772151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:34:06.574534+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:48.118648
License: Public Domain

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered December 5, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment and *1363denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We write only to note that the contention of defendant and third-party plaintiff that Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6) bars plaintiffs action against it is raised for the first time on appeal, and we therefore do not consider it (see Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840 [1994]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Centra, Garni and Gorski, JJ.