Court Opinion

ID: 34704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:19:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:59.407213
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 95-31229
                         Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY THOMAS,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                        USDC No. CR-95-34-D
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 14, 1997
Before WISDOM, KING, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Timothy Thomas appeals his sentence for distribution of

cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).   Thomas argues

that the Government breached the plea agreement.   We have

reviewed the record and find no plain error.   The Government

proffered evidence concerning Counts II and III only after the

district court ordered it to do so, and not before re-urging its

position that it did not oppose exclusion of such evidence as

     *
        The court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
relevant conduct.   Also, because all relevant conduct must be

considered in determining the base level offense,1 Thomas

is unable to demonstrate that the alleged breach of the plea

agreement affected his substantial rights.2

     AFFIRMED.

     1
          United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 117 (5th Cir.
1995); United States v, Byrd, 898 F.2d 450, 452 (5th Cir. 1990).
     2
          See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64
(5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1266 (1995).