Court Opinion

ID: 1004522
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:42:27.744769+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:12.310157
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6355

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL AARON LITTLE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-86-18-C, CA-01-26-V)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                   Decided:   May 29, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Aaron Little, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, United
States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Aaron Little seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Little, Nos. CR-86-18-C;

CA-01-26-V (W.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2001). Little’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied.   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2