Court Opinion

ID: 7591095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:45:03.305062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:39.705936
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. As to the civil theft judgment, there was evidence that appellant, Taurus Construction, Inc., used (for the benefit of another corporation) residual construction funds intended to be deposited in a “rent reserve” account to insure that investors received a guaranteed return on their investment. See Masvidal v. Ochoa, 505 So.2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
WARNER, J., concurs in part, dissents in part with opinion.