Court Opinion

ID: 993300
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:05:46.753254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:58.037987
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6777

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MAX GARFIELD ROSE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-94-81, CA-97-330-R)

Submitted:   September 25, 1997           Decided:   October 21, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Max Garfield Rose, Appellant Pro Se.    Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Rose, CR-94-81, CA-97-330-R (W.D. Va. May 8,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2