Court Opinion

ID: 5508019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 03:23:02.721596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:05.875389
License: Public Domain

HARDIN, P. J.
After the commencement of this action (October, 1891) to foreclose a mortgage given to the plaintiff, as trustee, and to his cotrustee, Sherman, a tender was made by the Carthage, Watertown & Sackets Harbor Railroad Company on the 6th of January, 1892. Thereafter an amended answer was served by the *58Carthage, Watertown & Sachets Harbor Railroad Company alleging the tender; and it is alleged in the answer of the Carthage, Water-town & Sachets Harbor Railroad Company that the money was on or about June 4, 1892, “duly paid into this court to the credit of this action, by paying the same to the county treasurer of Jefferson county, that being the county in which this action was triable.” The issues joined by the answer were put to a trial at a special term in Jefferson county, and the court found that the tender was sufficient, and dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint on the merits, with costs to defendants, and a general judgment to that effect was entered upon the decision so made. In the findings made it is stated “that the said moneys and checks so deposited with Vermilye & Co. remained there on such tender until on or about June 4, 1892, when they were duly paid into this court to the credit of this action, by paying the same to the county treasurer of Jefferson county, that being the county in which this action is triable; and the said moneys can now be had by the parties entitled thereto upon the delivery of the bonds and coupons aforesaid.” It was found that the mortgage contained no provision which required the mortgagor to pay the expenses and compensation of the trustees.
There has been no formal judgment or order entered authorizing the county treasurer to pay out of the court the funds so deposited with him. The trustees have a lien on said funds for their compensation. Woodruff v. Railroad Co., 129 N. Y. 27, 29 N. E. 251. The county treasurer has not been authorized by any formal order to pay over the fund which came into his hands as the fruit of this action, and no adjudication has been made which discharges the lien which the trustees have upon such fund. The extent of that lien ought not to be determined without notice to the Lincoln National Bank. If the county treasurer had applied for instructions as to the fund, and given notice of his application to the bank,, he might have obtained the direction of the court as to the fund, the extent of the lien thereon of the trustees, and an allowance of such fees as he was entitled to receive. Instead of adopting that course, he has made the motion which led to the order now under review. In his notice of motion he asks for an order “adjusting his fees as county treasurer in the receiving and paying out in this action the moneys,” etc. He thus assumed that he had received and paid out the moneys as an officer of the court.
The special term has by its order allowed the county treasurer $500, to be paid by the Carthage, Watertown & Sachets Harbor road. The Carthage, Watertown & Sachets Harbor road has not appealed, and therefore is not entitled to complain; and, as the appellant does not ask to have that part of the order reversed, there is no occasion to interfere with that part of the order. The foregoing views lead to a modification of the order.
Order modified by striking out all of the second paragraph, beginning with the words “It is further ordered,” and ending with the words “shall be discharged from all further liability in relation to the said fund,” and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
MARTIN, J., concurs. MERWIN, J., dissents.