Court Opinion

ID: 8451286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:27:02.54619+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.830164
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Richard Charles Daley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Daley, No. 3:02-cr-00251-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.