Court Opinion

ID: 4053903
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 04:25:39.750834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:30:47.453968
License: Public Domain

01-15-00287-CV
                                                    FILED IN
     NO.                                       st
                                              1 COURT OF APPEALS
                                                  HOUSTON, TX
                                                  March 27, 2015
                                             CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE,
       FIRST     IN THE                             CLERK
                COURT OF APPEALS
             HOUSTON, TEXAS

            In Re Jessica Bachelor

     Original Proceeding From the 246th
Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas
     Cause No. 201457427

  PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

               Stephen Lekas
              Attorney at Law
    6001 Clinton Dr., Houston, TX 77020
              (7 13) 67 1-9494
              (7 13) 67 1-9496
                  12188400
       ATTORNEY FOR RELATOR

           Temporary relief requested
                    IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

PARTY:                               ATTORNEY:

Jessica Bachelor                     Stephen Lekas
Relator                              TX Bar# 12188400
(Petitioner in trial court)          Attorney at Law
                                     6001 Clinton Dr.
                                     Houston, TX 77020
Erica Bachelor                       Tel#: (7 13) 67 1-9494
Real Party in Interest               Fax#: (7 13) 671-9496
                                     slekas@aol.com
(Respondent in trial court)
                                     Matthew Skillern
                                     Attorney at Law
HON. Charley Prine                   701 N. Post Oak, Suite 207
Respondent                           Houston, TX 77024
(Judge of Trial Court)               Tel#: (713) 229-8555
                                     Tel#: (713) 481-8800
                                     TB# 24041926
                                     matthew@skillernfirm.com

                                     3OgthJudicial District Court
                                     1115 Congress
                                     Houston, TX 77002
                                     Tel: (713) 274-4500
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                                      Page
IDENTIFY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL ....................................... 2
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................... 4
STATEMENT OF THE CASE ...................................................... 5
STATEMENT OF THE JURISDICTION .......................................... 5
ISSUE PRESENTED ................................................................. 5. 6
STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................... 7
ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES ........................................ 8-12
PRAYER -RELIEF REQUESTED ................................................ 12
CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND VERIFICATION ........................ 13.14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ...................................................... 16
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE .............................................. 15
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .............................................. 15
APPENDIX ............................................................................ 18
                       INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Cases                                                                            Page
In Re Calderon,
96 S.W. 3rd 7 11 (Tex. App. - Tyler 2003) .............................. 8
Dallas Fire Insurance Company v. Davis,
893 S.W. 2nd 288 (Tex. App. - Forth Worth 1995) ...................              10
In Re Elizabeth Ann Lambdin,
(No. 07-03-0328-CV-8-20-03)(Tex. App. - Amarillo 2003)               .........   10,ll
In Re Green,
385 S.W. 3rd 665 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2012) ...................              8
Grozier v. L-B Sprinkler & Plumbing Repair,
                                           k h writ denied) ....
744 S.W. 2nd306 (Tex. App. - ~ o r t k ~ o 1988,                                 11
Hoffman v. Hoffman,
82 1 S.W.2d 3 (Tex. App. - Forth Worth 1992, no writ)           ............    9
MO. P. R. R. Co.,
998 S.W.2d 2 12 (Tex. 1999) .............................................       8
In Re Nicolette Milton,
420 S.W. 3rd, 245 (Tex. App. - Houston (1 Dist) 20 13) ..........                899
In Re Prudential Ins, Co. of Am.
145 S.W.3d 124, 135-136 (Tex 2004) .................................            8
In Re Rome,
182 S.W. 3rd 424 (Tex. App. - Eastland 2005)          ........................   8

                                    STATUTES
Tex. Fam. Code
5 103.001 .................................................................      6, 12

Tex. Gov. Code
5 22.221 (b) .................................................................. 5
                         STATEMENT OF THE CASE

      Relator Jessica Bachelor submits this petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the order of Honorable Charley Pine presiding Judge of the 246&

Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. For Clarity, relator is referred to

as Jessica Bachelor; respondent the Honorable Charley Prine is referred to by name

and the real party in interest is referred to as Eric Bachelor. This is a suit for

divorce and child custody proceedings filed by relator in the 246" Judicial District

Court of Harris County, Texas on 10-2-2014 App. 1., Cause No. 201457427. The

orders complained of were orders of abatement granted on 1-27-2015 A p . 12 and

an order to transfer the case granted on 2-20-2015 by Judge Prine App. 16.

                    STATEMEMENT OF JURISDICTION

      This Court has jurisdiction to hear this original proceeding under Texas

Governrnent Code $22.221(b).

Issues Presented

   1. The Harris County trial Court abused its discretion in ordering an abatement

      A . 12 in its earlier suit, subsequent to a prior abatement by the Smith

      County trial Court App. 5, where the later divorce action was filed App. 2.

   2. The Harris County 246" Trial Court abused its discretion in ordering a

      Motion to Transfer ADD.16 after granting an abatement.
3. The Harris County 246" Trial Court abused its discretion in ordering a

  Motion to transfer App. 16 after the relator and her child resided in Harris

  County over 90 days, in violation of Tex. Fam. Code 5 103.OO1.
                           STATEMEMENT OF FACTS

      A suit for divorce and custody proceeding was filed by the relator Jessica

Bachelor on 10-2-2014 App. 1 in Harris County, Texas where she and her child

lived. Subsequently Eric Bachelor the real party in interest filed a divorce and

custody proceeding in Smith County on 10-8-2014 A m . 2. Thereafter Jessica

Bachelor relator file a plea in abatement App. 3 in Smith County that was granted

on 12-4-2014 App. 5.

      On 12-12-2014 the real party in interest Eric Bachelor then filed a plea in

abatement in Harris County, Texas along with a Motion to Transfer the case to

Smith County on 1-23-2015 App. 6 & 7. Relator amended her pleadings to show

residency in the County of 90 days ADD.11. The plea of abatement was granted by

Judge Prine on 1-27-20 15 ADD.12. The Motion to transfer filed by the real party

in interest on 12-12-2014, was granted on 2-20-20 15 by Judge Prine App. 16.
      ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES

        To be entitled to mandamus relief the trial Court must clearly abuse its

discretion and petition lacks an adequate appeal. In re Prudential Ins Co of Am

145 S.W.3d 124,135-136 (Tex. 2004).

      The Texas Supreme Court has held that reversible error alone is insufficient

to warrant mandamus relief and that generally venue decisions are incidential trial

rulings correctable by appeal. In Re Rome 182 S.W.3d 424, 426 (Tex.App.           -

Eastland 2005). The Texas Supreme Court has made an exception however for

cases involving suits affecting parent-child relationship, reasoning that the need to

expediously resolve custody and support issues makes ordinary appeal inadequate.

M0.P.R.R. Co. 998 S.W.2d 212,215 (Tex 1999) In Re Nicolette Milton, 420 S.W.
3d 245,252 (Tex.App. - Houston (1'' Dist) 2013). In re Calderon 96 S.W.3d 71 1,

715 (Tex.App.   -   Tyler 2003) ("Remedy by regular appeal though available is

frequently inadequate to protect the rights of parents and children to trial in a

particular venue.") The sensitive child custody and visitation issues involved in

this case render ordering appellate review of the venue issue inadequate In Re

Nicolette Milton at 253. In Re Green, 385 S.W.3d 665, 671 (Tex. App. San

Antonio 2012), the San Antonio Court of Appeals found the Petitioner failure to

satisfy the residence requirement was appropriate for mandamus relief.
      Id at 67

      ISSUE 1.

      The Harris County trial Court abused its discretion in ordering an abatement

App. 12 in its earlier suit APP. 1, subsequent to a prior abatement by the Smith

County trial Court App. 15, where the later divorce action was filed App. 1.

      In this case, the Relator filed a suit for divorce and child custody in Harris

County, Texas on 10-2-2014 APP. 1, prior to the real party in interest filing a

divorce and child custody proceeding in Smith County on 10-8-2014 App. 2. The

case in Smith County was abated on 12-4-2014 App. 5. Subsequently on 12-12-

2014, upon Motion by the Real party in Interest App. 6, the Respondent Judge

Prine abated the case in Harris County on 1-27-2015 App. 12. On 1-23-20 15, prior

to the hearing, the Relator had amended her pleading APP. 11 showing the residing

requirement had been met. In fact, by the time the abatement hearing was had, the

residency requirement had been met, as over 90 days had passed. The Court even

agreed. RRI: 5-6 (entry of order 1-27-2015); RR1: 5 (motion to reconsider 2-3-

20 15).

      In Re Milton, 420 S.W. 3d 245,252 (Tex.App. - Houston (1" Dist) 2013) the

Court states, typically when the residence requirements have not been met the trial

court abates the suit so that either party can meet the residency requirements. See

also Hoffman v. Hoffman, 82 1 S.W.2d 3, 5-6 (Tex.App. - no writ) holding that

                                         9
the trial court should abate until Petitioner meets residence requirements at which

point Petitioner may file an amended Petitioner showing compliance with

requirements Id. At 252.

      The trial Court in a second abatement has no discretion to refuse to abate the

second in favor of the first. Likewise the first Court has no discretion to abate it in

favor of the second action. See Tex. R. Civ. P 39, 97 (a); Dallas Fire Insurance

Company v. Davis, 893 S.W. 2d 288,292 (Tex. App. - Forth Worth 1995). Thus

Judge Prine of the 246" Court of Harris County, Texas abused his discretion by

indefinitely abating App. 5, RR1:5 (entry of order 1-27-2015) a case first filed

App. 1, where the impediment to abatement had been removed App. 11, thus

abating a case filed first App. 1, in favor of a case in Smith County filed second

App. 2, which was previously abated App. 5. Judge Prine of the 246" trial Court

then granted a Motion to transfer App. 16 the case to Smith County, on 2-20-2015.

The Motion to Transfer was also filed 12-12-2014 App. 7.

Issue 2

      Judge Prine of the Harris County 246" Trial Court abused his discretion in

ordering a Motion to Transfer Am. 16 after granting an abatement App. 8.
      Judge Prine granted the real parties in interest abatement on 1-27-2015 App.

8, RR1:8
-          (entry of order 1-27-2015). Then on 2-20-2015 granted the real party in

interest Motion to transfer App. 16, RR1:7 (motion to reconsider 2-3-201 5).

      It is well settled that complaints about venue may be waive expressly or

impliedly. In re Elizabeth Ann Lambdin (Tex. App. - Amarillo 2003) (NO. 07-03-

0328 CV, August 2003). The latter occurs when the party takes some action

inconsistent with its position on the venue issue. Grozier v. L-B Sprinkler &

Pumbin Repair, 744 S.W. 2d 306,3 10 (Tex.App. -Forth Worth 1988, writ denied).

In Re Elizabeth Lambdin, Mother waived Motion to Transfer venue by

participating in hearing to resolve Motion to enforce, before obtaining a ruling on

the Motion to Transfer. In Re Elizabeth Ann Lambdin (Tex. App.          -   Amarillo

2003) (NO. 07-03-0328 CV, August 2003) See Id.

      When a party does not first seek a ruling on a plea of privilege its benefits

may be waived by submitting for the Courts determination matter on a plea in

abatement.. . or invoking the judgment of the Court.. . and otherwise submitting to

the jurisdiction of the Court. Id. Grozier v. L-B Sprinkler & Pumbin Repair, 744

S.W. 2d 306,310.

      Here the real party in interest filed a plea in abatement and Motion to

Transfer at the same time on 12-12-2014 App. 6 &7, but proceeded to obtain a
                                             -
ruling on the plea in abatement on 1-27-2015 App. 8,24 days before the ruling on
the Motion to Transfer APP. 16, thus waiving the Motion to Transfer.

Issue No. 3

          Judge Prine signed an order transferring the case to Smith County on 2-20-

2015 Ohio App. 16, after the Relator and her child had resided in Harris County over

140 days App. 11 in direct violation of Tex. Fam. Code 103.OO 1, which requires

the case remain in the County of the residence of the child. $103.001 of the Texas

Family Code states "the original suit shall be filed in the County where the child

resides, unless:" None of the exceptions apply. The child and her mother lived in

Texas for six months and Harris County over 90 days App. 11. The child's father

resided in Smith County. Judge Prime's action in transferring the case was an abuse

of discretion.

                                        PRAYER

          Wherefore, Relator Jessica Bachelor requests that this Court issue a writ of

mandamus directing Judge Prine of the 246'b Judicial District Court of Harris

County, Texas to vacate his order of abatement granted 1-27-2015 and order to

transfer granted 2-20-2015, under cause no. 2014-57427. Relator requests general

relief.
          -
STEPHEN LEKAS
6001 CLINTON DRIVE
HOUSTON, TX 77020
TEL# (7 13) 67 1-9494
FAX# (7 13) 67 1-9496
TBA# 12188400
slekas@,aol.com
Attorney for Relator
                   RULE 52.3(J) CERTIFICATION OF FACTS
                     AND VERIFICATION OF RECORD
         Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared

Stephen Lekas, one of the counsel for Relator JESSICA BACHELOR, and upon

his oath, stated that (i) he is the attorney for Relator in this cause in the underlying

suit, No. 2014-57427, in the 246" Judicial District of Harris County, Texas; (ii) he

has reviewed Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus and concluded that every

factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the

appendix and record, and (iii) he has personal knowledge that the items in the

appendix and record are true and correct copies of documents material to Relator's

claims and are either pleadings that are on file in the underlying suit, hearing

transcripts and exhibits, or orders signed by the trial court in the underlying suit in

this cause in the underlying suit, No. 2014-57427, in the 246thJudicial District of

Harris County, Texas.

                                               STEPHEN LEKAS

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on this                               $3 +&
                                                                            day       of

                                               THE STATE OF         %   \   e ~ c-&
My Co mission Expires:
      2-zq-Z O I 6

*
% *
I the Notary   blic in this case, do hereby certify I am not an attorney in this case.
                       CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

      As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.l(a)(5), I certify that I

have conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties

which are listed below about the merits of this motion with the following results:

      Matthew Skillen, Attorney for Eric Bachelor.

                                                      I

                                                   STEPHEN LEKAS

                                                          3 - a 7-zo)<
                                                   Date

                       CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

      As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10(a), I certify that I

have notified or made a diligent effort to notify all parties by expedited means

(such as by telephone or fax) that this motion for temporary relief has been or will

be filed.

                                                    -
                                                   STEPHEN LEKAS

                                                   Date
                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

     I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was

mailedlemailed to the opposing counsel and Trial Judge by hand delivery on

     Real Party in Interest via CMRR/email

     Matthew Skillern
     Attorney at Law
     701 N. Post Oak, S-207
     Houston, TX 77024
     Tel: (7 13)229-8555
     Fax: (713) 48 1-8800
     TB# 24041926
     mattew@skillernfirrn.com

     Trial Court Judge via hand delivery

     Hon. Charley Prine
     246thJudicial District Court
     201 Caroline
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: 71 3 2 ~ c / ! i / 5 0
                               C)
                      CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

        My name is Stephen Lekas, attorney for Relator in Interest, Jessica

Bachelor. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i); I hereby certify

that this brief contains 2 5 35- words. This is a computer-generated document

created in Microsoft Word, using 14-point typeface for all text. In making this

certificate of compliance, I am relying on the word count provided by the software

used to prepare the document.

                                                        "I
                                                        I

                                           STEPHEN LEKAS
                                      APPENDIX
                                                                                     Page

App 1 Original petition for Divorce, Harris County Texas ....................... A
App 2    Original petition for Divorce, Smith County, Texas ...................... B
App 3 Motion to Abate, Smith County, Texas ..................................... C
App 4    Transcript Abatement hearing Smith County, Texas ..................... D
App 5    Order to Abatement, Smith County, Texas. ................................ E
App 6 Eric Bachelor Plea in Abatement, Harris County Texas ................. F
App 7 Eric Bachelor Motion to Transfer, Harris County, Texas           ................ G
App 8 Jessica Bachelor's Response to Plea in Abatement,
      Harris County, Texas .......................................................... H
App 9 Jessica Bachelor Response to Motion to Transfer,
      Harris County, Texas.. .......................................................... I
App 10 Jessica Bachelor Motion to Reconsider, Harris County, Texas .......... J
App 11 Jessica Bachelor second amended petition, Harris County, Texas ....... K
App 12 Judge Prines order granting Eric Bachelor plea in abatement ............ L
App 13 Erik Bachelor's Motion to Reconsider transfer, Motion to dismiss and
       Motion for additional fees and sanctions.. .................................. M
App 14 Jessica Bachelor response to Eric Bachelor's Motion to reconsider
       Transfer, to dismiss and for additional fees and sanctions ............... N

App 15 Jessica Bachelor supplemental response to Eric Bachelor's
       Motion to Transfer .............................................................. 0
App 16 Judge Prines order transferring the case to Smith County ................. P