Court Opinion

ID: 5608090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:50:09.800813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:01.082802
License: Public Domain

Wade, J.
1. Where one is charged with the violation of a valid municipal ordinance prohibiting the keeping of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale, proof of one sale is sufficient to authorize a conviction. Rice v. Eatonton, 15 Ga. App. 505 (83 S. E. 868); Sawyer *349v. Blakely, 2 Ga. App. 159 (58 S. E. 399); Coggins v. Griffin, 5 Ga. App. 1 (62 S. E. 659); Cooper v. Port Valley, 13 Ga. App. 169 (78 S. E. 1097); Rooney v. Augusta, 117 Ga. 709 (45 S. E. 72); Robinson v. Americus, 121 Ga. 180-182 (48 S. E. 924).
Decided November 5, 1915.
Certiorari; from Bibb superior court — -Judge Mathews. July 30, 1915.
A. T. Walden, for plaintiff in error.
Walter Defore, B. G. Plunlcett, contra.
2. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict.

■Judgment affirmed.