Court Opinion

ID: 7723219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:32:22.267215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:13.892724
License: Public Domain

PAYNE, J.,
concurring:
¶ 17. Undoubtedly, the evidence presented at Lowe’s trial was clearly sufficient to sustain his conviction of robbery. Thus, I agree with the majority’s result sustaining Lowe’s conviction. However, I find the discussion of the jury instructions at the conclusion of the majority’s otherwise exemplary opinion to be unnecessary. There was no objection to the jury instructions below by Lowe. Accordingly, I see no need for us to reach an issue not related to the disposition of this case.
¶ 18.1 concur in the judgment.
BRIDGES, LEE, AND THOMAS, JJ., JOIN THIS SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION.