Court Opinion

ID: 902411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-14 05:26:03.23673+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:36.949463
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-20350       Document: 00512273017         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/13/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 13, 2013
                                     No. 12-20350
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EVARISTO ROJAS GUZMAN, also known as Guerro,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:10-CR-638-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Evaristo Rojas Guzman has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Guzman has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Guzman’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.