Court Opinion

ID: 6111776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-24 08:15:51.601571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:20.942892
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-21-00306-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

RIGNEY CONSTRUCTION &
DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND
JOHN A. RIGNEY,                                                           Appellants,

                                               v.

HECTOR DANNI,                                       Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 275th District Court
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria
         Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

      This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On December 1, 2021, the Clerk

of the Court notified appellants that, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), the appeal

was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellants
provided reasonable explanation for their failure to timely file a brief. Appellants failed to

respond to the notice and have not filed a brief.

       Appellants have neither reasonably explained their failure to file a motion for

extension of time nor filed their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

                                                                 DORI CONTRERAS
                                                                 Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the
20th day of January, 2022.

                                              2