Court Opinion

ID: 4373925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-05 19:33:17.962674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:13.699244
License: Public Domain

People v Breedy (2019 NY Slip Op 01521)

People v Breedy

2019 NY Slip Op 01521

Decided on March 5, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 5, 2019

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Moulton, JJ.

4939/16 8580 2143/17 8579

[*1]The People of the State of New York,	 Respondent,
vHoward Breedy, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered July 24, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 5, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.