Court Opinion

ID: 8420642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 20:40:19.479661+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:23.621488
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Rudolph Garcia appeals the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 40-month term of imprisonment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Garcia has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.