Court Opinion

ID: 9379370
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-15 15:04:04.437995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:51.327178
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                             LAWTON COHEN,
                                Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,
                                Appellee.

                              No. 4D22-1099

                             [March 15, 2023]

   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-015781CF10A.

  Jason T. Forman of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort
Lauderdale, for appellant.

  Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   The defendant appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850
motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, he challenges the denial of all
ineffective assistance of counsel claims raised in the motion. We affirm
the denial of relief as to all claims except one, upon which we reverse and
remand for further proceedings.

    In the defendant’s second claim for relief, he asserted that trial counsel
provided ineffective assistance by agreeing to the giving of a jury
instruction on the lesser offense of attempted leaving the scene of an
accident involving death. The defendant argued the evidence did not
support the giving of the attempt instruction. On the authority of Badger
v. State, 933 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), we reverse the denial of relief
as to this claim, and remand for either an evidentiary hearing or the
attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim. See id. at 730
(reversing the summary denial of a claim that counsel was ineffective for
failing to object to an attempted burglary instruction where the evidence
showed only a completed burglary).
  Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

GERBER, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

                          *         *         *

    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                    2