Court Opinion

ID: 3103410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:28:38.140226+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:34.097143
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-11-00014-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
JOSE LUIS GARCIA,                                                                    Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
GILLMAN AUTOMOTIVE
F/K/A KELLOGG 
CHEVROLET OF HARLINGEN,                                                    Appellee.

 ____________________________________________________________
 
                     On
appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
                                      of
Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                            MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
 Before Chief
Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

The
appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 9, 2011.  On May 4, 2011,
the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely
filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution
under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from
the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure
and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to
timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been received from appellant.  
Appellant
has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
PER CURIAM
 
Delivered and filed the
21st day of July, 2011.