Court Opinion

ID: 7721942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:29:54.573463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:12.558648
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994)(confessions of arrested accomplices admissible if truly self-inculpa-tory, rather than attempt to shift blame or curry favor); Franqui v. State, 699 So.2d *7361312 (Fla.1997)(same); Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629 (Fla.1997)(setting forth circumstances in which non-testifying codefend-ant’s redacted confession is admissible with limiting jury instruction).