Court Opinion

ID: 9375353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-27 16:00:57.521854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:58.326960
License: Public Domain

Corrected February 24, 2023

      United States Court of Appeals
           for the Fifth Circuit
                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                           February 17, 2023
                           No. 17-20545                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                  Clerk

Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Incorporated; Sierra
Club,

                                                   Plaintiffs—Appellees,

                               versus

ExxonMobil Corporation; ExxonMobil Chemical
Company; ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Company,

                                                Defendants—Appellants.

            Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:10-CV-4969

        ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

        (Opinion July 29, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 968 F.3d 357)
       (Opinion August 30, 2022, 5 Cir., 2022, 47 F.4th 408)

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas,
Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
                                  No. 17-20545

       A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
and not disqualified having voted in favor,
       IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify
a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th
Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinions in this case dated July 29, 2020, and
August 30, 2022, are VACATED.

                                       2