Court Opinion

ID: 7720629
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:27:44.090559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:11.344661
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.
Arthur William Boyne seeks a rehearing or rehearing en banc pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) and 9.331(a). He argues that “this court has overlooked or misapprehended certain points of law or fact.” We have not. See Snell v. State, 522 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
DENIED.
GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
HARRIS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.