Court Opinion

ID: 1011878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:35:27.960462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:15.661699
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
 

  Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss his Title VII and age discrimination action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Hicks v. Roche,
  
  No. CA-02-923-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 23, 2003 & entered May 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED