Court Opinion

ID: 996598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:25.230532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:45.380920
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHARLES TERRENCE BARLOW,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-94-74, CA-98-138-2)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Terrence Barlow, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Charles Terrence Barlow seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Barlow, Nos. CR-94-74; CA-98-138-2 (E.D. Va. Mar.

3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2