Court Opinion

ID: 9946614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-29 21:11:07.715631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:25.344076
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                              WESTERN DISTRICT

 HENRY GIBBS, JR.,                        : No. 84 WM 2023
                                          :
                     Petitioner           :
                                          :
                                          :
              v.                          :
                                          :
                                          :
 PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD,               :
                                          :
                     Respondent           :

                                        ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2024, the “Application for Extraordinary

Relief,” the “Motion to Present Evidence,” the “Motion for Summary Judgment,” the

“Motion for Clarification,” and the Motion to Expedite are DISMISSED.               See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is

not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.