Court Opinion

ID: 7460013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:27:45.323544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:47.221451
License: Public Domain

BARKDULL, Chief Judge
(concurring in part; dissenting in part).
, I concur with the revised opinion prepared by Judge Pearson, except for that portion relating to punitive damages. I would affirm the jury award of punitive damages.
The defendant, who had previous connections with the plaintiffs in their mutual support of Zionist activities, induced the two plaintiffs through misrepresentations to purchase stock. The defendant was much more experienced in stock matters; both the plaintiffs were retired and one was legally blind. The record shows that the defendant had previously been convicted of a crime [stock fraud], and I would sustain the punitive damages award as ren *407dered by the jury verdict. The defendant, who was accustomed to living in a luxurious apartment and driving a Rolls Royce, did not even take the time to attend the trial.