Court Opinion

ID: 33639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:07:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:20.802837
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  December 10, 2003

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 03-40791
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO LOZANO-SALAZAR,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-03-CR-144-1
                      --------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Armando Lozano-Salazar appeals his conviction of being found

in the United States following deportation after conviction of an

aggravated felony.   He argues, for the first time on appeal, that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior

conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing

factor and not as an element of the offense.    Lozano-Salazar’s

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235, 239-47 (1998).     Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-40791
                               -2-

466, 489-90 (2000), did not overrule that decision.    See United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000).   Thus, the

district court did not err in sentencing Lozano-Salazar under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b).

     AFFIRMED.