Court Opinion

ID: 5590480
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 02:08:11.729219+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:20.933404
License: Public Domain

Beok, Presiding Justice.
1. The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. Sill v. Sill, 149 Ga. 50 (99 S. E. 31) ; Landrum v. Rivers, 148 Ga. 774 (98 S. E. 477).
2. Tile portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous on the grounds taken in the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

F. M. Gleason, for plaintiff.
M. L. Harris, for defendant.'