Court Opinion

ID: 9406114
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-29 21:01:50.711358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:26.980070
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748     Doc: 14        Filed: 06/28/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                           UNPUBLISHED

                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                 FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                             No. 21-1748

        JAMES BEGGS; JOYCE BEGGS,

                           Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                     v.

        GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY; CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY U.S. INC.,

                           Defendants - Appellees,

              and

        AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, d/b/a
        Assurant, et al.,

                           Defendant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00110-AWA-DEM)

        Submitted: June 29, 2022                                      Decided: June 28, 2023

        Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        James Beggs, Joyce Beggs, Appellants Pro Se.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748      Doc: 14         Filed: 06/28/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748     Doc: 14         Filed: 06/28/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              James and Joyce Beggs (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order denying their

        postjudgment motion for reconsideration. Limiting our review to the issues raised in

        Appellants’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177

        (4th Cir. 2014), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

        we affirm the district court’s order. Beggs v. Am. Banker Ins. Co., No. 4:17-cv-00110-

        AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. June 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                   3