Court Opinion

ID: 5497397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 02:54:23.012188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:50.971283
License: Public Domain

Van Brunt, P. J.
The appeal in this ease seems to have been based upon the idea that a default is to be opened in every case as a matter of course. The motion is, we think, a mistaken one, ánd such motions should not be granted where the party applying has been guilty of loches, or where the denial of the motion will not do, under all the circumstances, an irreparable injury to the party in default. ’ There is no good reason why all the damages arising from the negligence of a party or his attorney should be visited upon the opposing party to the action, as would be the case if defaults were to be opened as a matter of course. The plaintiff in this case has been guilty of great loches in the making of this motion, and should be remitted to a new action for the enforcement of his rights, if he has any. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.