Court Opinion

ID: 698866
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:39:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:28.140408
License: Public Domain

59 F.3d 167NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Harrison NIXON, a/k/a Rondal Harrison Nixon,Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE of South Carolina;  T. Travis Medlock, AttorneyGeneral of the State of South Carolina,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-6097.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 1995.Decided June 27, 1995.

Ronald Harrison Nixon, Appellant Pro Se.  Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Nixon v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-1068-6-19AK (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED