Court Opinion

ID: 1005151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:52:27.941403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:37.455479
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6804

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CASSEL DIXON,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-97-7-V, CA-98-551-3)

Submitted:   August 23, 2001                 Decided:   August 30, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cassel Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Hidgon, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Cassel Dixon appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Dixon, Nos. CR-97-7-V; CA-98-551-3

(W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2