Court Opinion

ID: 8604127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 01:40:33.410462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:14.206064
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Clarence Gillis seeks to appeal Respondent’s motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The filing Gillis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.