Court Opinion

ID: 9918482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-13 11:10:36.813404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:43.048073
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00322-CR
                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
                                         TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:                                                 §

ALLEN RENE MOORE,                                      §       ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR                                                §

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                          PER CURIAM
        Allen Rene Moore, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding to complain of
Respondent’s failure to rule on his application for writ of habeas corpus. 1

        Relator    is   represented     by    counsel.     A    criminal    defendant     is   not    entitled
to hybrid representation. Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
Relator must look to appointed counsel for representation in this original proceeding. See In re
Bice, No. 12-12-00038-CR, 2012 WL 2033131, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler June 6, 2012, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The absence of a right to hybrid
representation means Relator’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus presents nothing for this
Court to review. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also In
re Clark, Nos. 12-20-00208&209-CR, 2020 WL 5552617 (Tex. App.—Tyler Sept. 16, 2020,
orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (denying mandamus
petition because relator was represented by counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation); In
re Searcy, No. 14-20-00481-CR, 2020 WL 4012007, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.]

        1
          Respondent is the Honorable Kerry L. Russell, Judge of the 7th District Court in Smith County, Texas.
The State of Texas is the Real Party in Interest.
July 16, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (per
curiam); Bice, 2012 WL 2033131, at *1. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 2

Opinion delivered January 10, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

                                              (DO NOT PUBLISH)

        2
          Additionally, Relator’s petition fails to comply with appellate Rules 52.3(a), (e)-(f), (h), and (k), and 52.7.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (form and contents of petition); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7 (record).

                                                           2
                                  COURT OF APPEALS
     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                          JUDGMENT

                                          JANUARY 10, 2024

                                        NO. 12-23-00322-CR

                                     ALLEN RENE MOORE,
                                           Relator
                                             V.

                             HON. JUDGE KERRY L. RUSSELL,
                                      Respondent

                                       ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

              ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Allen
Rene Moore; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-23-00322-CR and the defendant in
trial court cause number 007-1360-23, pending on the docket of the 7th Judicial District Court of
Smith County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on December
20, 2023, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that
the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the
said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby denied.
                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.