Court Opinion

ID: 989755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:11:25.225648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:38.998972
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6205

MICHAEL D. REMER,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

A. ZERVAKOS, CCMS; J. CUMMONS, CCMM; G.
LOVICK, Parole Hearing Officer; MARYLAND
PAROLE COMMISSION,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
94-3099-PJM)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                   Decided:   July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Remer, Appellant Pro Se.    John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Remer v. Zervakos, No. CA-94-3099-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2