Court Opinion

ID: 993303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:05:48.354545+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:35.830121
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

ANTHONY GRANDISON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CR-79-189-H, CA-97-1359-H)

Submitted:   September 25, 1997           Decided:   October 21, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his peti-

tion for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Grandison, Nos. CR-79-189-H; CA-97-1359-H (D. Md. May 1,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2