Court Opinion

ID: 4095213
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-03 14:26:56.55083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:09:09.101261
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-16-00505-CV

                              COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

LAKEITH RAQIB AMIR-SHARIF,                                                        Appellant,

                                              v.

TDCJ, ET AL.,                                      Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 36th District Court
                     Of Bee County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
                  Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       On September 19, 2016, appellant, Lakeith Raqib Amir-Sharif, filed a notice of

appeal from the “rulings and actions” of the trial court. The record reflects that on August

29, 2016, the Attorney General of Texas filed “Defendant’s Notice of Removal to Federal

Court.” Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant

that it did not appear that this Court has jurisdiction, so that steps could be taken to correct
the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. The Clerk further notified

appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected after the

expiration of ten days from receipt of the Court’s notice.        Appellant has not filed a

response.

       Once a case has been removed from state to federal court, the state court is

divested of all jurisdiction over the case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d).; Nat’l S.S. Co. v.

Tugman, 106 U.S. 118, 122 (1882); Meyerland Co. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 848 S.W.2d
82, 83 (Tex. 1993) (order); Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., 917 S.W.2d 75, 84 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 1996, writ denied). Because this case has been removed to federal

court, the federal court has exclusive jurisdiction and this Court lacks jurisdiction over this

appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c).

                                                          PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
3rd day of November, 2016.

                                              2