Court Opinion

ID: 9368323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 19:00:38.094869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:07.022735
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10568         Document: 00516634135             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/03/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10568
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 3, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Gabriel Lee Mendoza,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-14
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Gabriel Lee Mendoza has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10568    Document: 00516634135         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/03/2023

                                 No. 22-10568

   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2