Court Opinion

ID: 6093316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 20:08:34.500563+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:37.984913
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Michalek, J.), entered December 21, 2001, which, inter alia, denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.
*930It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the cross motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 seeking a stay of arbitration. Supreme Court erred in denying respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner’s failure to specify a return date in the notice of petition as required by CPLR 403 (a) constitutes a jurisdictional defect that requires dismissal of this proceeding (see Matter of Figaro v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 203 AD2d 678, lv denied 84 NY2d 801). In any event, respondent also is entitled to dismissal because petitioner’s service of the notice of petition and petition by ordinary mail constitutes a further jurisdictional defect (see CPLR 7503 [c]; Rodriguez v Allstate Ins. Co., 180 Misc 2d 969, 972-973). Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Burns and Gorski, JJ.