Court Opinion

ID: 9873953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 21:53:36.237006+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:15.538160
License: Public Domain

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ,
concurring:
I concur in the opinion for the panel majority, except for its holding that the juvenile had non-party standing to appeal from the protective orders issued in the adult case. The juvenile did not participate at all in the adult case and so by definition did not “participate[ ] in the proceedings actively enough to make him privy to the record” as required for non-party standing. Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 259 (4th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).