Court Opinion

ID: 3061999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-14 07:31:02.682855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:49:32.649590
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                           OF TEXAS
                            NOS. WR-83,895-01 AND WR-83,895-02

                      EX PARTE ROBERT KARL NUNLEY, Applicant

           ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
  CAUSE NOS. 21,494-2011 A AND 21,657-2012 A IN THE 402ND DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM WOOD COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was charged with indecency

with a child by contact in the -01 case, continuous sexual abuse in the -02 case. He pleaded guilty

pursuant to a plea agreement in the -01 case in exchange for a twenty-year sentence. Applicant

entered an open plea of guilty in the -02 case to the lesser offense of aggravated sexual assault of a

child, and was sentenced to life imprisonment, to run concurrently. He did not appeal his

convictions.
                                                                                                      2

       Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to investigate and interview witnesses. Applicant also alleges that trial counsel coerced him

into pleading guilty in both cases, and gave him erroneous assurances that he would receive no more

than twenty years’ imprisonment if he entered an open plea of guilty in the -02 case.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with copies of the written plea papers from

both cases. The trial court shall also supplement the habeas record with transcripts of the plea and

sentencing hearings in the -02 case. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of

law as to whether the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether

counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make findings of fact

and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily

entered. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
                                                                                                   3

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 14, 2015
Do not publish