Court Opinion

ID: 8742393
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 10:53:08.247383+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:00:29.011608
License: Public Domain

HANNAY, District Judge.
This is a suit to set aside an award of compensation granted pursuant to the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.
Plaintiffs attack the jurisdiction of defendant deputy commissioner C. D. Cal-beck to enter such award, contending that the situs of the injury to defendant John William Welch was such that his remedies were limited to those provided by the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act. The most recent authorities suggest a contrary conclusion. Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co., 1962, 370 U.S. 114, 82 S.Ct. 1196, 8 L.Ed.2d 368; Holland v. Harrison Bros. Dry Dock and Repair Yard, Inc. (5 Cir. 1962), 306 F.2d 369. The thrust of those cases is to obliterate nice distinctions constrictive of admiralty jurisdiction. The “building ways” in this case are sufficiently similar to other structures included in the comprehensive term “drydock” to sustain the deputy commissioner in his finding of jurisdiction. In the light of those opinions, especially as they delimit the “twilight zone,” the Puget Sound1 **and Atlantic2 cases are not persuasive.
It appearing to the Court after plenary hearing that the award is supported by substantial evidence, the action of the deputy commissioner is therefore affirmed.

. Puget Sound Bridge & Dry Dock Co. v. O’Leary, (W.D.Wash.), opinion filed December 13, 1963. 224 F.Supp. 557.

. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. O’Keeffe (S.D.Ga.1963), 220 F.Supp. 881.