Court Opinion

ID: 4380736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-25 22:00:41.198044+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:33.561430
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAR 19 2019
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    18-10123

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00098-LRH-2

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
CEDRIC JACKSON,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Nevada
                    Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted March 12, 2019**

Before:      LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

      Cedric Jackson appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his

supervised release and challenges the 24-month sentence, which was ordered to

run consecutive to the state sentence he is currently serving. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jackson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Jackson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                  18-10123