Court Opinion

ID: 3498352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:05:47.443831+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:15:49.228200
License: Public Domain

On the 28th of August, 1929, Robert Louis Edgerton, three years and four months of age, was instantly killed when struck by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. His mother, Jennie Edgerton, as administratrix of his estate, brought this suit under the death act (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14577 et seq.) to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by herself and her husband. She received a verdict of $1,000. The court refused plaintiff's motion to set it aside on the ground that it was inadequate, and entered judgment on the verdict. The plaintiff has brought error.
During the impaneling of the jury, a question arose as to the number of peremptory challenges which the plaintiff was entitled to exercise. She had exercised four and claimed the right to a fifth. The court overruled the last challenge, holding that, with the exercise of four, her right to peremptory challenge was exhausted. In so ruling the court erred. By statute, Act No. 342, Pub. Acts 1921 (amending 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12612), each party in all civil cases is allowed five peremptory challenges. The right of peremptory challenge as restricted by statute is a substantial right of which a party cannot be deprived without prejudice.
It is not necessary to discuss the inadequacy of the verdict.
The judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff.
WIEST, C.J., and BUTZEL, CLARK, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. *Page 453