Court Opinion

ID: 9859798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 22:41:01.865521+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:06:33.702399
License: Public Domain

MASON, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in the result reached by the majority reversing this case but would do so on the basis of errors considered in Divisions I and II of the majority opinion. I would hold either of these assigned errors or in combination were prejudicial and required reversal.
However, I would hold defendant failed to properly preserve his asserted error as to instruction 10. The error, if any, in the giving of this instruction was invited and for this reason I join in that part of Division III of the dissent commencing with the second complete paragraph in column 2 on page 49 which starts: “We have held many times * * * ” ending with the statement near the middle of column 2, page 53: “It was not for ‘an additional instruction’, as the majority insists on asserting.”