Court Opinion

ID: 5808841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:42:45.325166+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:47.701149
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim for damages sustained by the infant petitioner and for the derivative damages accruing thereby to the parent, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 5, 1975, which, inter alia, granted the application. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provisions which granted the application as to the parent’s derivative claim and substituting therefor a provision that, as to the parent’s derivative claim, the application is denied. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In this case it is asserted that a prematurely born infant was given excessive oxygen in an incubator, that such oxygen caused her blindness and that the injury was only discovered during the sixth postdischarge check-up examination some months later. Under the circumstances, we believe it was a proper exercise of discretion to permit the filing of a late notice of claim in her favor (cf. Borgia v City of New York, 12 NY2d 151). We do not agree, however, that the discretion which may be exercised by the court because of the injured petitioner’s infancy accrues to the benefit of the father. His claim arose on the date he was informed of the impairment and he delayed filing for many months past the 90 days provided under subdivision 1 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law (see Matter of Defelice v Board of Educ., 37 AD2d 930; Jefferson v New York City Housing Auth., 24 AD2d 943; Matter of McAllister v New York City Housing Auth., 21 AD2d 660). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.