Court Opinion

ID: 5074946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 11:14:41.055607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:22.546626
License: Public Domain

Appellant was convicted by a jury for criminal mischief and assessed 5 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed.Krupa v. State, 750 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising three grounds for review.
We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983).
With this understanding, appellant's petition for discretionary review is refused. *Page 645 
TEAGUE, J., would grant, and MILLER, J., would grant grounds 2 and 3.