Court Opinion

ID: 8465354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:04:22.370327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.887936
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ricardo Clement appeals from the judgment revoking his probation and imposing a sentence of 30 days imprisonment and 35 months supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Clement’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.