Court Opinion

ID: 5650983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 23:01:13.218886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:34.674274
License: Public Domain

WARMER, J., pro tem.
This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for libel. The question presented on this appeal is precisely the same as presented in the case of Wheatland v. Maloney et al., Civil No. 178 (ante, p. 288 [294 Pac. 499]).  On the authority of Wheatland v. Maloney this day decided, the judgment is affirmed.
Cary, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 2, 1931.
Seawell, J., and Preston, J., dissented.