Court Opinion

ID: 4092224
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-25 07:07:27.505584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:36:06.055563
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  October 14, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0354. ROBERT GEORGE SANDERS, JR. v. THE STATE.

      In 2011, Robert George Sanders, Jr. pled guilty to robbery,1 for which he was
sentenced to twenty years, with fifteen years to serve in prison, and aggravated
assault, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ probation to be served consecutively
to his sentence for robbery. In 2016, Sanders filed a “Motion to Correct an Illegal
and/or Void Sentence,” which the trial court dismissed. Sanders seeks a direct appeal
from the trial court’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate
remedy in a criminal case,” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)
(2009), and any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be
dismissed, see id. at 218 (2); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d
150) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or
correct a void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence
is, in fact, void. See Harper, 286 Ga. at 217, n. 1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118,
119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited
to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which
the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). When

      1
        Sanders was charged with armed robbery, but pled guilty to the lesser
included offense of robbery.
a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State,
278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      In his motion, Sanders does not contend his sentences fall outside the statutory
range. Instead, Sanders alleges that his aggravated assault conviction is void, the
indictment was defective, there was double jeopardy violation, and his counsel was
ineffective. Sanders’s challenges are challenges to the validity of his convictions, not
his sentences. See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 493-494 (1), (2) (659 SE2d 875)
(2008) (challenge to validity of indictment is challenge to conviction, not sentence);
Coleman v. State, 305 Ga. App. 680, 680-681 (700 SE2d 668) (2010) (ineffective
assistance of trial counsel does not constitute a valid void sentence claim). Because
Sanders has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack jurisdiction to consider
his appeal. See Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                                                             10/14/2016
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                               Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                        , Clerk.