Court Opinion

ID: 8148776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:28:47.692867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:35.008499
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Glenn v. Doyal, ante, p. 526; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Comm’rs, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, *529316, 317.
Mr. Powell C. Groner, with whom Messrs. Robert W. Otto and Henry N. Ess were on the brief, for appellant.
' Messrs. Henry L. McCune and E. H. Wright were on the brief for appellee.