Court Opinion

ID: 9833309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:36:21.714257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:01.459650
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[2] In our opinion upon original hearing we did not intend to hold that the acts of J. J. Kinneb'rew in depositing the proceeds arising from the operation of the gin in bank to his wife’s credit, and 'the taking of the deed in his wife’s. name containing the recital that it was for the separate use of his wife, constituted a gift as a question of law; but we meant only that such .acts, in connection with other facts and circumstances in evidence, were sufficient to support a finding of such a gift.
With this correction, the motion for rehearing is overruled.