Court Opinion

ID: 9420551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:55:08.745121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:25.764268
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Douglas,
with whom Mr. Justice Black concurs, dissenting.
The result reached by the Court may be sound by legislative standards. But the legal standards which govern us make the process of reaching that result tortuous to say the least. We must say that petitioner’s “jam” purports to be “jam” when we read § 403 (g) and purports to be not “jam” but another food when we read § 403 (c). Yet if petitioner’s product did not purport to be “jam” petitioner would have no claim to press and the Government no objection to raise.