Court Opinion

ID: 4665026
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-04 21:10:42.18639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:39.645514
License: Public Domain

[Cite as In re Name Change of Biggerstaff, 2021-Ohio-591.]

                                       COURT OF APPEALS
                                      PERRY COUNTY, OHIO
                                   FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN RE: CHANGE OF NAME OF                                     JUDGES:
       ABIGAIL BIGGERSTAFF                                   Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P. J.
                                                             Hon. John W. Wise, J.
ASHLEY DECOT                                                 Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

        Applicant-Appellee

-vs-                                                         Case No. 20 CA 00012

GREGORY BIGGERSTAFF

        Respondent-Appellant                                 OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:                              Civil Appeal from the Court of Common
                                                      Pleas, Probate Division, Case No.
                                                      20209010

JUDGMENT:                                             Reversed and Remanded

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY:                               March 4, 2021

APPEARANCES:

For Applicant-Appellee                                For Respondent-Appellant

ASHLEY DECOT, PRO SE                                  KYLE C. HENDERSON
2421 Cooperriders Road, NW                            30 West Hunter Street
Glenford, Ohio 43739                                  Logan, Ohio 43138
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                         2

Wise, John, J.

       {¶1}    Appellant Gregory Biggerstaff appeals the May 4, 2020, decision of the

Perry County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, granting a change of name of

minor child.

       {¶2}    Appellee Ashley Decot has not filed a brief in this matter. App.R. 18(C)

states in pertinent part: “If an appellee fails to file the appellee's brief within the time

provided by this rule, or within the time as extended, the appellee will not be heard at oral

argument * * * and in determining the appeal, the court may accept the appellant's

statement of the facts and issues as correct and reverse the judgment if appellant's brief

reasonably appears to sustain such action.”

                           STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

       {¶3}    Appellant Gregory Biggerstaff is the biological father of Abigail Renee

Biggerstaff (DOB 3/11/2011). He and the minor child’s Mother, Ashley Decot, were

divorced by an agreed order dated September 14, 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas

of Crawford County, Pennsylvania, where the parties shared physical custody of the

minor child.

       {¶4}    On March 11, 2020, Appellee Ashley Decot, filed an Application for Change

of Name of Minor with the Perry County Probate Court, to change the name of the minor

child, Abigail Renee Biggerstaff to Abigail Renee Decot.

       {¶5}    In said Application, Appellee Ashley Decot did not indicate on the

Application that the address of Father was unknown. Instead, Gregory Biggerstaff was

identified as the father of the minor child, with an address of 3067 Fitzgerald Road, Simi

Valley, CA 93065.
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                      3

       {¶6}   A hearing was scheduled upon the Application for May 4, 2020.

       {¶7}   No certified mail was served upon father at the aforementioned address.

       {¶8}   On April 1, 2020, Notice of Hearing on Change of Name was published in

the Perry County Tribune.

       {¶9}   On May 4, 2020, the trial court summarily approved the Application without

hearing.

       {¶10} On May 18, 2020, Appellant filed an Objection to Name Change and a

motion for reconsideration of the trial court’s ruling.

       {¶11} On June 3, 2020, Appellant filed a Request for Transcript.

       {¶12} On June 3, 2020, a letter from the trial court judge was filed stating no

hearing was held in this matter and no transcript existed.

       {¶13} It is from this decision that Appellant now appeals, raising the following

assignments of error:

                                   ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

       {¶14} “I. APPLICANT, ASHLEY DECOT, FAILED TO GIVE PROPER NOTICE

TO FATHER, GREGORY BIGGERSTAFF, PROPER NOTICE PURSUANT TO RC

2717.01(B).

       {¶15} “II. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN GRANTING

APPLICANTS [SIC] PETITION TO CHANGE THE MINOR'S NAME BY FAILING TO

CONDUCT A HEARING AND FAILING TO APPLY THE BEST INTEREST STANDARD.”
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                        4

                                               I., II.

      {¶16} In his two assignments of error, Appellant argues the trial court abused its

discretion and ruled against the manifest weight of the evidence in granting Appellee's

request to change the name of the minor child. We agree.

      {¶17} Proceedings for a name change are governed by R.C. §2717.01. The

statute provides:

             (A)(1) A person desiring a change of name may file an application in

      the probate court of the county in which the person resides. The application

      shall set forth that the applicant has been a bona fide resident of that county

      for at least one year prior to the filing of the application, the cause for which

      the change of name is sought, and the requested new name. ***

             (2) Except as provided in division (A)(4) of this section, notice of the

      application shall be given once by publication in a newspaper of general

      circulation in the county at least thirty days before the hearing on the

      application. The notice shall set forth the court in which the application was

      filed, the case number, and the date and time of the hearing.

             (3) Except as provided by division (C) of this section, upon proof that

      proper notice was given or that notice was waived under division (A)(4) of

      this section and proof that the facts set forth in the application show

      reasonable and proper cause for changing the name of the applicant, the

      court may order the change of name.

             (4) If an applicant for a change of name submits to the court, along

      with the application described in division (A)(1) of this section, satisfactory
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                       5

      proof that the publication of the notice under division (A)(2) of this section

      would jeopardize the applicant's personal safety, both of the following apply:

             (a) The court shall waive the notice requirement.

             (b) If the court orders the change of name under division (A)(3) of

      this section, the court shall order the records of the change of name

      proceeding to be sealed and to be opened only by order of the court for

      good cause shown or at the request of the applicant for any reason.

             (B) An application for change of name may be made on behalf of a

      minor by either of the minor's parents, a legal guardian, or a guardian ad

      litem. When application is made on behalf of a minor, in addition to the

      notice and proof required pursuant to division (A) of this section, the consent

      of both living, legal parents of the minor shall be filed, or notice of the

      hearing shall be given to the parent or parents not consenting by certified

      mail, return receipt requested. If there is no known father of the minor, the

      notice shall be given to the person who the mother of the minor alleges to

      be the father. If no father is so alleged, or if either parent or the address of

      either parent is unknown, notice pursuant to division (A) of this section shall

      be sufficient as to the father or parent.

             Any additional notice required by this division may be waived in

      writing by any person entitled to the notice.

      {¶18} R.C. §2717.01(B) makes clear that a parent of a minor child is a necessary

party who must consent to the child's name change or be given notice of the proceedings

so that he or she may be heard in the matter. See In the matter of Randolph, 11th Dist.
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                        6

No. 2003-T-0017, 2005-Ohio-414, at ¶ 8-9. In order to obtain personal jurisdiction over

such a parent, her or she must voluntarily appear, commit acts which waive a jurisdictional

defense or properly receive service of process. Id. at ¶ 8; Maryhew v. Yova (1984), 11
Ohio St. 3d 154, 156, 464 N.E.2d 538. A judgment entered without proper service is null

and void. State ex rel. Ballard v. O'Donnell (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 182, 183, 553 N.E.2d
650, citing Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader (1956), 165 Ohio St. 61, 64, 133 N.E.2d 606.

      {¶19} Both R.C. §2717.01(B) and Civ.R. 4.4 predicate effective service of process

by publication upon the address of the party to be served being unknown. If the parent's

address is known, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence may be discovered, then

notice of hearing must be had by “certified mail, return receipt requested.” See In the

matter of Randolph, supra, at ¶ 15; Civ.R. 4.4(A).

      {¶20} In this matter, the record, including the Application filed by Appellee, is

sufficient to establish that Appellee knew Appellant’s address.

      {¶21} In such a circumstance, R.C. §2717.01 requires service by certified mail to

establish personal jurisdiction over the non-consenting parent. In re the matter of

Randolph at ¶ 8. There was no service made or even attempted to Appellant by certified

mail; therefore, personal jurisdiction for him was never established. Absent personal

jurisdiction, the judgment of the court is void. A judgment which is void due to a lack of

personal jurisdiction constitutes a reason for vacating a judgment pursuant to Civ.R.

60(B)(5), GBS Corp. v. Creative Horizons, L.L.C. (Mar. 27, 2000), 5th Dist. No.1999-CA-

356, or, perhaps more properly, may be set aside within the court's inherent power to

vacate a judgment undermined by a jurisdictional defect. Id. In either event, vacation of

the judgment at issue was proper.
Perry County, Case No. 20 CA 00012                                                        7

       {¶22} Based on the foregoing, Appellant’s assignments of error are sustained.

       {¶23} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, Perry

County, Ohio, is reversed and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent

with the law and this opinion. Specifically, the trial court is instructed to enter judgment

vacating its previous judgment granting the name change.

By: Wise, John, J.

Baldwin, J., and

Wise, Earle, J., concur.

JWW/kw 0303