Court Opinion

ID: 2925804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:27:19.931747+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:08.340083
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-00521-CV

                              COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

RUBEN ESQUEDA,                                                                APPELLANT,

                                              v.

KATHY JO ESQUEDA,                                  APPELLEE.
_____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 343rd District Court
                    of Live Oak County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant’s brief in the above cause was due on December 17, 2007. On February

6, 2008, the Court notified appellant, who is proceeding pro se, that the appeal was subject

to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant reasonably explained

his failure to file the brief and the appellee was not significantly injured by his failure to

timely file the brief. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c). Appellant’s response, filed
with this Court on February 15, 2008, fails to provide a reasonable explanation for his

failure to file the brief and further fails to request an extension of time for said filing.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See id.

                                                 PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam delivered
and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.

                                             2