Court Opinion

ID: 8279790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 03:46:00.808405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:40.283401
License: Public Domain

MacLEAN, J.
At the time of the service of the summons and complaint on or about April 6, 1909, the person served informed the server that he was not, and for some time had not been, an officer of the defendant corporation, and the evidence discloses that said person had resigned as president, treasurer, and director on January 5,1909, at a meeting of the board of directors, and that a successor was elected. This may not be said to have been contradicted by "hearsay admission of such person, later in January, that he was the president of the defendant, which, appearing specially by counsel for the purpose of traversing the return, was entitled to prevail. This is not the forum for discussing whether the statutory method for effecting service upon corporations may be converted into an instrument by which a corporation may evade its creditor.
Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant. All concur.