Court Opinion

ID: 5667886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 13:50:25.890474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:30.239157
License: Public Domain

The Surrogate.
The manner in which the motion was argued indicated that the attachment sought was under section 2555 of the Code, as for a contempt, which has no application to the proceedings, the decree having-been entered before September 1, 1880 (§ 3347, subd. 11). But the moving papers seem to justify the issuing of an attachment under section 10, subd. 4, of 3 R. S., 327 (6 ed.), which must be in form similar to that used by the court of chancery in analogous cases.
Ordered accordingly.