Court Opinion

ID: 998750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:15:30.74499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:50.307108
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6085

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

IVAN CHARLES TAPPIN, a/k/a Lester, a/k/a Wayne
L. Smith, a/k/a Lester Smith,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-95-249, CA-98-320-1)

Submitted:   May 13, 1999                   Decided:   May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivan Charles Tappin, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ivan Charles Tappin seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Tappin, Nos. CR-95-249; CA-98-

320-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 1998).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2