Court Opinion

ID: 9666205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 01:07:50.069929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:24.734866
License: Public Domain

WUEST, Acting Justice
(concurring in result).
I concur in the result of the majority opinion for most of the reasons expressed, but more particularly, because incarceration and probation are mutually exclusive.
So there will be no misunderstanding on the part of trial judges, I still adhere to my conclusions in State v. Adams, 360 N.W.2d 519 (S.D.1985); although it may be that the legislature overruled it and State v. Hotter, 340 N.W.2d 691 (S.D.1983), and Application of Adams On Behalf of Schmit, 360 N.W.2d 513 (S.D.1985). See Senate Bill 236 amending SDCL 23A-27-19, effective July 1, 1985.
I am authorized to state that WOLL-MAN, J., joins in this concurrence in result.