Court Opinion

ID: 990332
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:19:41.882361+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:32.172191
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6337

STEVEN E. JONES,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JOHN F. HIMMEL, JR.,
Classification Case Management; BERNICE ALLEN,
Classification Supervisor; JOHN LOCKLEAR, Case
Management Specialist; LARRY SATTERFIELD, SUI,
Supervisor, in their individual and official
capacities,
                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
96-460-S)

Submitted:   August 22, 1996           Decided:     September 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Jones v. Smith, No. CA-96-460-S (D. Md. Mar. 1, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2