Court Opinion

ID: 9905794
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-30 16:02:04.726826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:53.270883
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-2536
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

          Russell Kimble Jackson, also known as Russell Kimble Jackson, V

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                        ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
                                   ____________

                           Submitted: November 20, 2023
                             Filed: November 30, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Russell Jackson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his pro se motion for
return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g). Following a

      1
       The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.
careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion.
See Jackson v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 398 (8th Cir. 2008) (after denial of Rule
41(g) motion, this court reviews district court’s legal conclusions de novo and factual
findings for clear error).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________

                                          -2-