Court Opinion

ID: 9838075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-04 12:07:21.346465+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.848809
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued August 29, 2023

                                         In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                                        For The

                            First District of Texas
                              ————————————
                                NO. 01-22-00934-CV
                              ———————————
      JULIUS OBASOHAN AND ADESUWA OBASOHAN, Appellants
                                           V.
                              BOBBY TRAN, Appellee

                 On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
                           Fort Bend County, Texas
                     Trial Court Case No. 22-CCV-071544

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellants, Julius Obasohan and Adesuwa Obasohan, proceeding pro se, filed

a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 15, 2022 order. Appellants have

failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief).
      The clerk’s record was filed on January 20, 2023, and the reporter’s record

was filed on April 26, 2023. Accordingly, appellants’ brief was due to be filed on

or before May 26, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellants did not file an

appellants’ brief.

      On June 6, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that this appeal

was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was

filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of

appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of

prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply

with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite notice that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond.

      Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

                                           2