Court Opinion

ID: 9889238
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-07 00:00:27.584093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:44.781623
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10417         Document: 00516923220             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10417
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                October 6, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Victor Juarez Rodriguez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:22-CR-184-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Rodri-
   guez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
   relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10417     Document: 00516923220          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/06/2023

                                   No. 23-10417

         We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-
   frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2