Court Opinion

ID: 1006691
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:58.365407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:18.552758
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CLYNTON JOHN    CHASE,   a/k/a   Rossi,    a/k/a
Raspitan,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-91-86, CA-01-375-3)

Submitted:   February 14, 2002            Decided:   February 22, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clynton John Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Clynton John Chase seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Chase, Nos. CR-91-86; CA-01-

375-3 (W.D.N.C. July 27, 2001).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2