Court Opinion

ID: 9351610
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-02 00:09:44.816113+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:02.152246
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-22-00598-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

   IN RE CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION D/B/A CIRRUS AIRCRAFT

                       On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

                                        ORDER

    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva
                          Order Per Curiam

       On December 27, 2022, relator Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft

(Cirrus) filed a petition for writ of mandamus contending that the trial court abused its

discretion by (1) issuing a “Sharing Protective Order,” and (2) requiring relator to respond

to requests for production. We request the real parties in interest, Scott Carrol Jorgenson,

individually and as representative of the estate of Carrol Vester Jorgenson, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, such as Armando Lopez,

Terry Lopez, and Armando Lopez and Terry Lopez as next friends of A.L., a minor, to file
a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days

from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

                                                                    PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the
28th day of December, 2022.

                                            2