Court Opinion

ID: 812521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-11-26 20:43:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:28.224458
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-1404   Document: 20    Page: 1   Filed: 11/26/2012

          NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   Wniteb ~tate1l 629 F.3d 1374, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2011). We retain
jurisdiction so that any of the parties may seek appellate
review by notifying the clerk of the court within thirty
days of entry of the district court's determinations on
remand. The appeals are held in abeyance pending the
resolution of the motions by the district court. The parties
should promptly inform this court of the district court's
Case: 12-1404         Document: 20   Page: 3     Filed: 11/26/2012

 3        SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES V. GORDINI U.S.A., INC.

 rulings on the motions and should propose how they
 believe the appeals should proceed in light of the district
 court's rulings.

     In granting the motions, the Federal Circuit takes no
 position as to whether the district court should grant the
 motions for vacatur.

       Accordingly,

       IT Is ORDERED THAT:

    (1) The amended motions to remand are granted to
the limited extent explained above. The court retains
jurisdiction over the appeals at this time.

       (2) All other pending motions are moot.

       (3) The briefing schedules are stayed.

                                      FOR THE COURT

                                       /s/ Jan Horbaly
                                      Jan Horbaly
                                      Clerk
 s19