Court Opinion

ID: 8467035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:55:30.486453+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.197530
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tammy J. Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Lynchburg Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu, 2009 WL 222663 (W.D.Va. Jan. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.