Court Opinion

ID: 5569272
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:08:42.476796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:42.160869
License: Public Domain

Lumpkin, P. J.
An equitable petition was filed in the superior court of Union county, by A. A. Fain, administrator of M. M. Fain, and by John England, against T. C. Hughes and M. G. Hamby, executors of T. M. Hughes. The defendants filed a plea of res adjudicata, and the case was submitted to the presiding judge for determination without the intervention of a jury. The defendants introduced in evidence the record of a former equitable proceeding which had been instituted by the same plaintiffs against the same defendants, and showed that this action had been dismissed upon a general demurrer for want of equity. A comparison of the two petitions dis*538closes that they undertake to set forth identically the same cause of action. It is true that the last petition prays for certain relief to which no reference was made in the first petition; but the right, if any, to such additional relief is based upon the precise state of facts set forth in the petition filed in the first instance. In sustaining the demurrer to that petition, the court adjudicated solemnly and finally that the plaintiffs had no cause of action and were not entitled to relief of any kind. This case, therefore, is controlled by section 3744 of the Civil Code, which declares that: “If upon demurrer the court has decided upon the merits of the cause, the judgment may be pleaded in bar of another suit for the same cause.” Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court below sustaining the plea of res adjudicata.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.