Court Opinion

ID: 9833650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:55:14.164134+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:05.590036
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
We withdraw the statement in the original opinion that appellee was not contesting the judgment of the lower court on certificate No. 792, and affirm the judgment as to this certificate on the ground that on the jury’s verdict appellant was entitled to judgment thereon. In the lower court appellee filed certain pleas in abatement as to all the certificates involved in this litigation. This plea was overruled, and on the merits judgment entered as set out in the original opinion. If the plea in abatement is sustained, as prayed for by appellant, the result would be a reversal and remand in toto of the judgment of the lower court, with instructions to dismiss the case from the docket of the lower court. Because of the small amount involved in certificate No. 792, and because appellee stated he was willing to abide by our judgment on this certificate, provided our judgment as to all the certificates became final, we are overruling his motion for rehearing. We do not set out the facts on this plea in abatement because they appear without controversy and the issue is one purely of law. However, nothing said here*639in is intended to estop appellee against suing out a writ of error as to certificate No. 792, should 'he so desire.
Motions for rehearing filed by both parties are in all things overruled, except as indicated above.