Court Opinion

ID: 9831483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:08:13.262333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:35.304137
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In motion for rehearing, appellees contend that the deposit it claims to have made with the Guaranty State Bank of Cleburne on April 4th was excepted from the blanket mortgage given by the Cleburne bank to the Dallas bank on April 2d, to secure any and all forms - of indebtedness of the Cleburne bank to the Dallas bank, and say:
“.The simple and conclusive answer to that is that the $30,000 was deposited with the distinct agreement that it -was not secured, and that agreement, of course, excluded it from the mortgage.”
There is no evidence in the record that there was any agreement between the Dalla's bank and the Cleburne bank to the effect *737that the $30,000 deposit was not secured, or that it was excepted from the blanket mortgage.
■Appellees’ motion is overruled.