Court Opinion

ID: 9474476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 04:57:55.16917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:44:06.112818
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 11-12-85, 11 Cir., 775 F.2d 1433).
Before RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD *, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The petition for rehearing is DENIED. This being an interlocutory appeal for the purpose of getting a single question decided, there has been no decision here as to whether the State’s library plan is sufficient to meet the requirements of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977), and we make no observations as to what is necessary in a particular case to meet those standards.
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.