Court Opinion

ID: 3817148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:53:24.89372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:56:47.295635
License: Public Domain

This case was tried to a jury in the court below. At the close of the testimony on behalf of plaintiff, who is plaintiff in error, the court sustained a demurrer to the evidence and directed a verdict for defendants; and upon the return of such verdict rendered judgment for defendants. No motion for new trial was filed.
The only errors assigned in the petition in error are: That the court erred in withdrawing the case from the jury and directing a verdict; and that the judgment is contrary to the law and the facts.
Defendants in error have filed in this court their motion to dismiss the appeal, which was duly served on plaintiff in error on the 27th day of May, 1914.
The action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the evidence, directing a verdict and rendering judgment thereon, are matters occurring at the trial and will not be reviewed in *Page 167 
this court unless a motion for new trial has been filed and acted upon in the court below. Board of Com'rs of Beaver Countyv. Langston et al., 41 Okla. 715, 139 P. 956, and authorities there cited.
The motion of defendants in error to dismiss the appeal must be sustained, and it is so ordered.
All the Justices concur.