Court Opinion

ID: 4210728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-11 15:07:28.526683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:48.331633
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                              State of Florida

                        Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

                              ________________

                               No. 3D17-1701
                         Lower Tribunal No. 12-15391
                             ________________

                             G.H., the Mother,
                                  Appellant,

                                      vs.

              Department of Children and Families, et al.,
                                  Appellees.

      An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jason E.
Dimitris, Judge.

     Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third
Region, and Kevin Coyle Colbert, Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

      Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children and Families; Laura J.
Lee, Anthony C. Musto and Thomasina F. Moore (Sanford), for appellee Guardian
ad Litem Program.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

                           ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

      PER CURIAM.
      G.H. is the mother of the minor child, D.E.B., who was born on January 4,

2016. The Department of Children and Families removed D.E.B. from G.H.’s

custody and, on May 10, 2017, the Department filed a petition for termination of

G.H.’s parental rights as to D.E.B. under section 39.806(1)(b) of the Florida

Statutes, based on her purported abandonment of D.E.B. The trial court conducted

an advisory hearing on the petition on May 31, 2017, which G.H. did not attend.

Based on G.H.’s failure to attend the advisory hearing, the trial entered a consent

to the termination of G.H.’s parental rights on behalf of G.H. as to D.E.B. See §

39.801(3)(d) of the Florida Statutes (2016) (“If the person served with notice under

this section fails to personally appear at the advisory hearing, the failure to

personally appear shall constitute consent for termination of parental rights by the

person given notice.”). The trial court entered a Final Judgment of Termination of

Parental Rights and Disposition as to the Mother on June 14, 2017. G.H. appealed.

      Based on the Department’s commendable confession of error, we agree that

the final judgment must be reversed because the Department failed to personally

serve G.H. with: (i) a copy of the Department’s petition to terminate her parental

rights; and (ii) a summons containing the required notice of the date, time and

place of the advisory hearing on the petition, and specifying that G.H.’s failure to

personally appear at the advisory hearing would constitute G.H.’s consent to the

termination of her parental rights of D.E.B. See § 39.801(3), Fla. Stat. (2016);

                                         2
M.J.W. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 825 So. 2d 1038, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA

2002) (“Under section 39.801(3)(a), notice of the advisory hearing and a copy of

the petition to terminate parental rights must be personally served upon the

parents.”).

      Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment terminating G.H.’s parental

rights as to D.E.B. and remand so that the Department may personally serve G.H.

with both a copy of the petition and a summons in compliance with section

39.801(3).

      Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

                                       3