Court Opinion

ID: 546463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:34.205292
License: Public Domain

911 F.2d 722Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Curtis Nathaniel FOWLKES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 89-6853.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 1990.Decided July 26, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-346-N)
Curtis Nathaniel Fowlkes, appellant pro se.
Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM:

1
Curtis Nathaniel Fowlkes seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Fowlkes v. Murray, C/A No. 89-346-N (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.