Court Opinion

ID: 1003052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:20:40.382022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:40.681775
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6893

WILLIAM EARL SANDERS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RANDALL R. LEE; LYNN C. PHILLIS; JAMES B.
FRENCH;   NORTH  CAROLINA  DEPARTMENT  OF
CORRECTIONS,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-727-5-F)

Submitted:   November 30, 2000            Decided:   December 8, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Earl Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William Earl Sanders, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.     See Sanders v. Lee, No. CA-99-

727-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2000).     We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2