Court Opinion

ID: 7782799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:15:40.709598+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:14.184300
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of the defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The defendant challenges the Department of Corrections’ interpretation of his sentence. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant pursuing his administrative remedies against the Department, after which, he can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the ap*837propriate circuit court. See Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.