Court Opinion

ID: 5970146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:33:20.70239+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:28.699184
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), rendered September 25, 2012, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.