Court Opinion

ID: 9568686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:06:33.936829+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:55:43.191612
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE ANDERSON,
(dissenting).
Since none of the parties question the right of plaintiffs to' maintain the action here presented and since the questions raised are of public concern, this court should pass on the case upon *74its merits rather than burden those interested with the need of seeking out a new plaintiff, who may more closely fit our technical niceties.
Resident taxpayers have sufficient interest to question the validity of Chapter. 31, Laws of 1953, before the court of Montana.
No useful purpose would be served by an expression from me regarding the merits of the case,, and I therefore reserve it.