Court Opinion

ID: 5676003
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 14:40:53.525809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:45.348793
License: Public Domain

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), both rendered February 20, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 4631/94, and attempted assault in the second degree under indictment No. 5899/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
*495The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.