Court Opinion

ID: 1006407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:11:01.091446+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:33.439323
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-7405

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., a/k/a Joe Johnson, a/k/a
Joseph R. Johnson,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CR-96-180-A, CA-01-1077-AM)

Submitted:   January 7, 2002                 Decided:   January 24, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joseph Johnson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Johnson, Nos.   CR-96-180-A;

CA-01-1077-AM (E.D. Va. July 30, 2001).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2