Court Opinion

ID: 6728326
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:07:49.499271+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:37.151515
License: Public Domain

Charles S. Buchanan Jr. brought this action originally in the Monroe Common Pleas against Charles A. Twinem, et al, all of whom are tenants in common of certain' property upon which oil rights have been leased. Charles S. Buchanan seeks a partition of royalties derived from oil taken from said property.
It seems that the plaintiff and defendants are tenants in common of property which passed under the will of C. S. Buchanan Sr., deceased. Oil rights had been leased in consideration of a % royalty to be paid to the owner of the property for all oil taken from said property. The Common Pleas refused partition and this judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Charles S. Buchanan, in the Supreme Court contends that he and the defendants own the royalty in common, in fee simple; that oil is part of the real estate, that it descends to the heirs as real estate and is therefore apartable.
It is further contended that the oil and gas in question is in place and undeveloped and is capable of separate ownership and subject to partition.