Court Opinion

ID: 4320197
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-11 21:42:51.202452+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:36:49.420221
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-88,975-01

                      EX PARTE JERRY SHANE MERRITT, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. CR31581-A IN THE 75TH DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM LIBERTY COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child by sexual contact and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Merritt v. State, No. 09-17-00140-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont March 14,

2018)(not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary and that counsel was

deficient for failing to know the law and failing to advise Applicant that, if he was convicted, he was

eligible for probation from a jury. Applicant also alleges that counsel failed to follow up with the
                                                                                                      2

charges in Dallas County and failed to speak to the Child Protective Services Officer responsible for

the case in Dallas County regarding the dropping of a count due to the lack of cooperation from the

accuser. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

         The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: October 10, 2018
Do not publish