Court Opinion

ID: 996301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:49:03.563658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:52.781047
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6760

GEORGE H. VAN WAGNER, III,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MARK A. HENRY, Warden,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-737-CCB)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George H. Van Wagner, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Van

Wagner v. Henry, No. CA-98-737-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 14, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2