Court Opinion

ID: 9426634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:18:30.985527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:02.023767
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Marshall,
with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in Parts I-III of the Court’s opinion. However, I believe the proper result would be to remand this entire case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with Washington v. Davis, 426 U. S. 229 (1976), and today’s opinion. The Court of Appeals is better situated *272than this Court both to reassess the significance of the evidence developed below in light of the standards we have set forth and to determine whether the interests of justice require further District Court proceedings directed toward those standards.