Court Opinion

ID: 3513561
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:24:33.445398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:46.037050
License: Public Domain

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Appeal and Error, 4CJ, p. 1232, n. 81; Costs, 15CJ, p. 281, n. 9.
The appellant, having recovered a judgment in the county court of Lauderdale county against one Zimmerman, procured a writ of garnishment thereon to be served upon the Guaranty Bank  Trust Company of Meridian. The bank, in answer to the writ, admitted that at the time of the service of the writ it had in its possession the sum of ninety dollars and ninety-seven cents to the credit of said Zimmerman subject to check, but that the garnishee was informed that said money did not belong to Zimmerman, but was the property of the Interstate Life  Accident Insurance Company, who had claimed the same, and prayed that the said company *Page 816 
might be summoned to appear and contest with plaintiff the right to said money.
The Interstate Life  Accident Company appeared and propounded a claim for eighty-three dollars and five cents of the money in the hands of the Guaranty Bank  Trust Company, and was awarded a judgment therefor, from which the appellant carried the case to the circuit court, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed and the case ordered to be remanded to that court, from which judgment the appellant has brought the case to this court.
The judgment of the court below was affirmed by this court on a former day of the present term, and the appellee moves the court for a judgment on the appeal bond, that it "recover of the appellant, and the sureties on her appeal bond, damages at the rate of five per centum upon the principal amount of the judgment rendered below against the garnishee, eighty-three dollars and five cents with interest at six per centum per annum on the amount of said judgment from the date thereof, and all costs of appeal and of the circuit court and of the county court in this proceeding, for which execution may issue, as authorized by section 4926, Code of 1906 (section 3407, Hemingway's 1927 Code)."
Section 4926, Code of 1906 (section 3407, Hemingway's 1927 Code), provides that:
"In case the judgment or decree of the court below be affirmed, or the appellant fail to prosecute his appeal to effect the supreme court shall render judgment against the appellant for damages, at the rate of five per centum and costs, as follows: If the judgment or decree affirmed be for a sum of money, the damages shall be upon such sum."
The judgment rendered by the circuit court simply affirmed the judgment rendered by the county court, but, nevertheless, it was, to all the intents and purposes, a judgment for a sum of money, to-wit, that awarded the *Page 817 
appellee in the county court. Consequently, the statute applies, and the motion will be sustained.
The appellee also requests that:
"The circuit court be directed to remand the case to the county court for enforcement by execution, or other proper process, as authorized by section 4946, Code of 1906, and section 5, chapter 131, Laws of 1926 (sections 3427 and 729 of Hemingway's Code of 1927)."
It is unnecessary for such an order to be included in the judgment here rendered by this court. In due course, the clerk of this court will certify the judgment here rendered to the circuit court, from which the case was appealed. It will then become the duty of the clerk of that court to deal with the judgment as if no appeal to this court had been taken, and to certify the action of the circuit court in affirming the judgment to the county court so that it may proceed with the enforcement of the judgment.
Motion sustained in part.