Court Opinion

ID: 1001071
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:50:17.560774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:18.032405
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-1061

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LEMUEL F. SWINDELL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CA-99-257-1)

Submitted:   March 9, 2000                 Decided:   March 16, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemuel F. Swindell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lemuel F. Swindell appeals the district court’s order dismiss-

ing Swindell’s motion to remove his state court traffic matter to

federal court for lack of jurisdiction.   We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

North Carolina v. Swindell, No. CA-99-257-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 17,

1999).   We deny Swindell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in

this court.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2