Court Opinion

ID: 1020679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:54:55.446602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:36.504283
License: Public Domain

*614
   
  PER CURIAM.
 

  Monte Deearlos Winston appeals the district court’s order granting his request to forward a letter to Winston’s attorney, in which Winston sought a copy of the court’s 2003 order denying his pre-trial motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss the indictment. Because the district court granted the requested relief, and Winston ultimately received a copy of the order from his attorney, we affirm.
  
   *
  

   United States v. Winston,
  
  No. 3:99-cr-00030-REP (E.D.Va. Mar. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   To the extent that Winston attempts to appeal the district court’s disposition of his motions, Winston's appeal is untimely, and we have no jurisdiction to consider it.
   
    See
   
   Fed. R.App. P. 4(b).