Court Opinion

ID: 4302004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-08 19:14:25.652207+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:58.788574
License: Public Domain

People v Sumpter (2018 NY Slip Op 05704)

People v Sumpter

2018 NY Slip Op 05704

Decided on August 8, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 8, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-05463

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vDanzel Sumpter, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 420/17)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Alice R. B. Cullina of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Christopher J. Blira- Koessler of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), imposed March 28, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., ROMAN, COHEN, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court