Court Opinion

ID: 4069474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-30 00:37:26.287807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:52:59.849897
License: Public Domain

/2ZS-IS
V f~)
        SIGINAL                 iH-QQ /raff6^
                               A ,, +                  RECEIVED IN
                                             :           SEP 18 m

                                                              FILEDIN-
                              7/g S/^e J Ttya.% CQURT0F criminalappeals
                                 yWA*              /        SEP 18 2S15
                                                          Abel Acosta, Cierk

        Pehh'on tor Rwie.u> in Cnu^e /i/o. Q5~H~ OO^ll- IK

              This is a Petition tor Lbisa'e.iionzryJ ftevieujj
        f evi tu/mg the Averse. decKion/opinion of tJne. I±xas
        Court d-f Cncnm'dl Appeals in fhetr affirmation
        of tht trial Courts qu'ilty vtrdict.

              Appellant ujou/J state; after tafci^j Me tria.1
        tf&nscr.pts &rd trial Exh)hlts C.dllecti*?i\,; M/3
        Monofable      Court ^Aou/d Atrerse. snd Re/na^J tAis
        (\aus&jQfter granting the Certinr,} 6&c£ to 1~Ae
          g-Xfri Cnmrt or Criminal AppealSj uulfA instructions
        to" thdf Honorable     Court -ha r on and this, wa'tfer
        hstk fp the Trial Court for full adjudication
        rtf the facts Consistent \jo\th this •HonoraAU
        Courts Mandate, naweL ft) &t fye. evidence adduced
        -at fn'af ma.s Uf&l/j/ insufficient to sustain a
        Zibnyi eti b'n..

                                    -I -
    .Appall,a/of tAJQuld Submit that SCtorJinj Jjho
fjie p6hrP Report^ Elaine Sai/y 5/af<vi #>*f /W
vehicle, /lad V-A^-ee £0 /^ scratch ts~ fft f/U
right S<^g;' iajAjcA oaurrfr/ u)/><v? fye appplla^
Lz\\?jec\lyl Collided uuth her, please te-e ;W
ref-tr to ^faH'-S fyhlhils S; U and 8.

      AC(l0jLd/_aj_Tb_J^^5m^^
jiisxr^/^jiy_is_5AftuJ-p^tf^^
LJ a'0-e_6_a.L/j?y -" c^r)i£d^_a^.J_i>o^.ux^l/ao.s./-^LD./7jiluj,b.ea^
.a±Jr!^;j^_^AiA_wj^
.her 1/^.Aiflg. /)cfnr*j;/->j fn+hp Ra/v-Um Ha^p D<V-<-;noa/-/i/J.

                     J-o^sJ:dle—OMS-e^.i/4^rL.wL/.M-
                     t-0Lcu_u.(_w2pa.c.Lj-Cf3s£

    jLoj?JY3ry_J_Ms,J^Bj/jL)L^                                           ._
^/}.fMka.tls_car:.      ___                                        _

    fLuLty^m££-)Jy—/-oAkLOj^
Vou'/I notice fkat f//e pht>f6jrdph< prodused _dj>_r?o£_
Supp-orJljfild^i:hw.Djo^-yij^en^f:o-^.fi '£>aJhs—C-o^nl/-
hJjLt^cp-&rjM£ni„Elagj.e_r£fc^
     ' a-ih.^CQj£^L6.&£)Jkz-Suppj)^
fb^Jb^±&A^^Jz^n.<L£no

                                 -2
trial Court; itxat Court d? fnmi/iJ Jaoed/j Zs?r/ Aeorr
this HonnrAiy/p Court^iooujP) evide^nre to proi/e 'ujMouf
3 sloA.dn\ju of a dnaAt, Mat rki<. incident did naf QCCUr
*uxJJ&Ljn&m*Lj6dLM^                      s d/s-Jj-cLd,.
3:&m£ly.J-ll&—CoJltSj-on-,J).oJ^
pldcinri in imminentAanoesj inhere Me State \ JAhrritJJ
:had tb fear for t)cr lift.

   yJJoirrfoj^AtCEkJji^JL^
ton fen JuMxsLj^jLjiaLjtidiusl^
C^ort-^h^^i^JL^f—t^rj±Q/ZL

     J~-n %c r-psc dm Aefore tliis ftnnoraA/* Pourf, apae/laif

JS-\t* emphasis on line J7; "... /tf/r G*W«rA fried
¥o Ait Vour vehicle with his vehicle... ' Please note.
 that Me witness AneS not std-h appellant tSe</crJ
m?de Content u/ith her ire hide.
  BaW On tkt States fjrtness Lo^nl testimony,
appellant never made con tact ujirh he' ye-hiJe. fhi/s
all fe?Jonp/)/e inference that Tire nfcorde>d h ttie
SHte are nullified. Tn f»ct} Hie Sjde\ \Alitr)eSS
\A)ho initially fi/pfJ the Complaint (Pullet Report)
recanted hoth prior to tri^l TinJ Auring hrid/}
tJr]eo_ui\rocg/lv statinj appellant Aid not fJ/lJe
uf&k the rthide tke. State \ l/ttneSfeS ujes*

                               -5"