Court Opinion

ID: 6570857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:28:36.50413+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:53.989359
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

The witness is inadmissible. He shall not be permitted to testify that he had no property in the chattel vended by him as his property. *155He is consequently interested in the event of this suit. Plaintiff had his remedy against the witness or the defendant at his election. A judgment in favour of the plaintiff in the present action might, by the witness, Howard Pierce, be pleaded in bar to a future action, which the present plaintiff might hereafter institute against him.
Jonathan Robinson, for plaintiff.
Israel Smith and-- — —,' for defendant,
Witness incompetent,