Court Opinion

ID: 988099
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:47:55.62708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:03.607082
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7680

RICHARD TODD HAWKINS,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN; TOM MARTIN; CITY OF HINTON,
OKLAHOMA,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-95-649-5-F)

Submitted:   November 28, 1995            Decided:   January 4, 1996

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Todd Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Hawkins v. Freeman, No. CA-95-649-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2