Court Opinion

ID: 7819757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:49:46.283719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:42.436991
License: Public Domain

John A. Fogleman, Justice, concurring. I concur. The only valid reason, however, for refusal of the instruction on dual agency, is that, under the evidence, Vogel was not vested with authority to exercise any discretion on behalf of either the buyer or the seller. He was merely a middleman who brought the parties together. 3 Am. Jur. 2d 620, Agency § 255; 12 Am. Jur. 2d 912, 914, Brokers § 171, 173;3CJS 149, Agency § 339; Annot, 14 ALR 464, 472.