Court Opinion

ID: 9373997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-22 16:13:16.499851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:44.073809
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                       Opinion filed February 22, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                            No. 3D22-1919
           Lower Tribunal Nos. F10-36830C and F11-15037A
                          ________________

                             Zevin Mitchell,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                          The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)
from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.

     Zevin Mitchell, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
     Affirmed.   See    Spencer     v.       State,   842   So.   2d   52   (Fla.

2003)("[S]ubstantive claims of prosecutorial misconduct could and should

have been raised on direct appeal and thus are procedurally barred from

consideration in a postconviction motion."); and Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d

726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)("A sentence is illegal for purposes of rule 3.800(a)

if it imposes punishment that no judge could possibly impose for the

charged crime under the entire body of sentencing statutes without regard

to the underlying factual circumstances.").

                                         2