Court Opinion

ID: 8457345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:34:49.262929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:05.500752
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jorge Luis Reyes, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in his ongoing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Reyes seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral *286order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.