Court Opinion

ID: 993022
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:01:35.594202+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.308796
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6402

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RHONDA KAYE SCRUGGS COOPER,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-92-62, CA-96-90-R)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997       Decided:   September 19, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rhonda Kaye Scruggs Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge
Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Cooper, Nos. CR-92-62; CA-96-90-R (W.D. Va.
Jan. 13, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568
(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2