Court Opinion

ID: 9501909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 19:54:39.173417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:54.153095
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed August 21, 2012 are withdrawn. A superseding opinion and dissent was circulated to the Court on October 12, 2012 and is being filed concurrently with this order.
After the superseding opinion and dissent was circulated, a judge sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Although no petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc was filed, the parties were given notice of the superseding opinion and dissent and permitted the opportunity to state their positions on whether the matter should be reheard en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
No future petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc will be entertained. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Judge Callahan would have the mandate issue after seven days as generally provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b).