Court Opinion

ID: 9410595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-22 00:00:34.32715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:58.883545
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10070        Document: 00516829911             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/21/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 23-10070
                                    Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                    ____________                                     July 21, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Jason Matthew Santiago,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 5:22-CR-31-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit
   Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jason Matthew
   Santiago has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santiago has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10070    Document: 00516829911          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/21/2023

                                  No. 23-10070

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2