Court Opinion

ID: 2868280
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 02:23:30.661438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:54.639258
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-04-00112-CV

                        Turfcentric, Inc. and Alan D. Colby, Appellants

                                                  v.

                         Incircuit Development Corporation, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
           NO. GN400180, HONORABLE PAUL DAVIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               On March 11, 2004, appellants contacted this Court and informed the clerk’s office

that a settlement had been reached and a motion to dismiss would be filed. No such motion has ever

been filed. On April 20, 2004, the clerk’s office sent appellants a notice that their brief was overdue

and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if a response was not made by April

30, 2004. See Tex. R. App. P. 38(a) (appellant’s failure to file brief in civil case may result in

dismissal for want of prosecution). To date, neither a brief nor any other response to the clerk’s
office communication has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

See id.; 42.3(b).

                                            W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 10, 2004

                                               2