Court Opinion

ID: 3253987
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:24:12.314215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:40.660140
License: Public Domain

The indictment in this case charged this appellant, and another, with the offense of grand larceny, in that they feloniously took and carried away about 1,620 feet of galvanized pipe of the value of, to wit, $202.50, the personal property of Claude King  Son, Inc., a corporation, etc. It was returned into open court by the grand jury and filed on the 8th day of February, 1932. On May 22, 1933, this appellant appeared, and in answer to the indictment interposed a plea of guilty to petit larceny, judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, the court having fixed a fine of $25, to which was added six months' hard labor for the county. Notwithstanding the fact that the accused pleaded guilty, as stated, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction to this court.
A plea of guilty, though voluntary, does not preclude the defendant from taking an appeal. Sammons v. State, 23 Ala. App. 162,122 So. 309. Hence this appeal will not be dismissed for that reason.
However, the judgment of conviction in the court below must be, and is, affirmed for the reason the record upon which this appeal is rested is regular in all things.
Affirmed. *Page 65