Court Opinion

ID: 1007266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:23:18.340063+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:00.681710
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-6066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PATRICK GREGORY,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CR-96-41, CA-01-573)

Submitted:   April 18, 2002                 Decided:   April 26, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Patrick Gregory seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.      Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Gregory, Nos. CR-96-41; CA-01-573

(E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 2001).     We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before   the   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                    2