Court Opinion

ID: 5111214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 15:24:54.414544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:34.818876
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Gensun Johnson (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an eviden-tiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).