Court Opinion

ID: 7356274
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 04:24:41.440881+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:29.071944
License: Public Domain

NIEMANN, J.
There were two prior supplementary proceedings, neither of which was formally discontinued by order. A petition in bankruptcy was filed against the judgment debtor on April 1, 1902.
The judgment herein was entered January 9, 1902.
[1] 1. Section 67f of the Bankruptcy Law contains the following provisions:
“That all levies, judgments, attachments, or other liens obtained through legal proceedings against a person who is insolvent at any time?, within 4 months prior to the filing of a petition in bankruptcy against him shall be deemed null and void in case he is adjudged a bankrupt, and the property affected by the levy, judgment, attachment, or other lien shall be deemed wholly discharged and released from the same, and shall pass to the trustee as a part of the estate of the bankrupt,” etc.
It would seem, therefore, that the order herein in supplementary proceedings is void because it has no subsisting judgment to rest upon. If the judgment became null and void by reason of the bankruptcy proceeding no valid proceeding supplementary to execution could be instituted or prosecuted for the obvious reason that there was no judgment to enforce. The creditor, by the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, was relegated to the bankruptcy court to take his place with the other creditors.
*332[2] 2. A supplementary proceeding can only be discontinued or dismissed, upon such terms as justice requires, by an order of the judge made upon the application of the judgment creditor. C. C. P. § 2454; Schwarmecke v. Glenny, 54 Misc. Rep. 36, 103 N. Y. Supp. 499; Cowen v. Bernard, 80 Misc. Rep. 394, 141 N. Y. Supp. 252; Matter of Rothschild v. Gould, 84 App. Div. 196, 197, 82 N. Y. Supp. 558. Want of prosecution does not abate it. '
3. It would seem, therefore, that in either case the present order in supplementary proceedings is invalid, and that the debtor cannot be forced to submit to an examination thereunder.
The motion to vacate said order is granted, without costs, and without prejudice to the judgment creditor to take such other steps or proceedings as he may be advised.