Court Opinion

ID: 1002675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:14:19.417852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:27.507823
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6472

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

VOLL VERNON GREENE,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-98-46, CA-99-629)

Submitted:   September 21, 2000           Decided:   October 5, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Voll Vernon Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, S.
David Schiller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Voll Vernon Greene seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Greene, Nos. CR-98-46;

CA-99-629 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2000).     We deny the motion for tran-

script at government expense and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2