Court Opinion

ID: 8275404
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 01:57:14.451042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:38.455419
License: Public Domain

CLARKE, J.
This action was tried before the same referee and at the same time as actions Nos. 2 and 3, opinions wherein are herewith handed down (105 N. Y. Supp. 33, 36) and presented the same general features; the mortgage being foreclosed being upon a house adjacent to the two covered by the former actions.
In this case the referee excluded all the documentary evidence and made similar findings to those considered in the two prior cases, including the finding as to the appointment and1 qualification of Preston as receiver, the evidence to establish which he had excluded.
This judgment must also be reversed, and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to .the appellant to abide the event. All concur.