Court Opinion

ID: 1020367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:50:07.728176+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:54.282845
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 06-6706

EDDIE M. RODRIQUEZ,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole
Board,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (1:05-cv-01503-TSE)

Submitted:   August 18, 2006             Decided:   September 8, 2006

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie M. Rodriquez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

            Eddie M. Rodriquez appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000).         We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court.        Rodriquez v. Fahey, No. 1:05-cv-01503-TSE

(E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2006).      We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before   the    court   and     argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                    - 2 -