Court Opinion

ID: 5171520
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 04:56:20.97752+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:06.709379
License: Public Domain

DUNN, J.
The questions involved in this case are identical with those of the ease of J. S. Hatcher and W. A. Snyder, Copartners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Hatcher & Snyder v. Barlow Ferguson, ante, p. 639, 198 Pac. 680.
*654On tbe authority of that case the judgment is .affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Rice, O. J., and Budge and McCarthy, 'JJ., concur.
Lee, J., dissents.
Petition for rehearing denied.