Court Opinion

ID: 4908341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-04 00:00:36.719019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:14.820415
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40740     Document: 00516003103         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/03/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                   September 3, 2021
                                  No. 20-40740
                                Summary Calendar                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Joel Rueben Lambright, Jr.,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 9:18-CR-13-1

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Joel Rueben Lambright, Jr., has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Lambright has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40740     Document: 00516003103         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/03/2021

                                  No. 20-40740

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Lambright’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2