Court Opinion

ID: 4194552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-08-09 18:01:12.966179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:21.067154
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-41544      Document: 00514108721         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/09/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                           United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-41544
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                           August 9, 2017
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                         Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OMAR ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:11-CR-93-1

Before KING, SMITH, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Omar Orlando Rodriguez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-41544    Document: 00514108721    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/09/2017

                                No. 16-41544

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2