Court Opinion

ID: 2961440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:43:24.078159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:06.087251
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ____________________        No. 92-1308                                      JO WHIGHAM,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                          FILENE'S DEPARTMENT STORE, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Walter Jay Skinner, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                               and Cyr, Circuit Judge.                                        _____________                                 ____________________            Jo Whigham on brief pro se.            __________            A. John  Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Thomas E. Kanwit,            ___________________                              ________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Affirmance  of        defendant/appellee Wayne Budd.            Julie   J.   Bernard  on   Motion  for   Summary  Affirmance   for            ____________________        defendant/appellee, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company.                                 ____________________                                  August 27, 1992                                 ____________________                 Per Curiam.    The judgment  of  the district  court  is                 __________            affirmed for  substantially the  same reasons  stated in  the            district court's February 17, 1992 order.                                                                                                           -2-