Court Opinion

ID: 3641785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 05:59:11.990538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:41.502764
License: Public Domain

The Court overruled the demurrer, gave the defendant time till 20 May, to file answer, and ordered that defendants appear before the clerk to be examined under oath concerning the matters set out in the pleadings, Code, section 580 et seq. The defendant excepted to the order and the judgment, but the Court being of opinion that an appeal did not lie, noted the exception and directed the clerk not (164) now to send up a transcript. The defendants thereupon applied, after notice to the plaintiff, to this Court for a certiorari. It is true that an appeal from the order of examination is premature and will not lie. Vann v. Lawrence, 111 N.C. 32; Holt v. Warehouse Co.,116 N.C. 480. But an appeal lies from the judgment overruling a demurrer. Commissioners v. Magnin, 78 N.C. 181; Ramsay v. R. R.,91 N.C. 418, and they are decisive of this application. The hearing here was complicated with other matters which have no bearing upon the sole question before us, which is as to the defendant's right to appeal at this stage of the case. The certiorari will issue, but it will not suspend the order of examination of defendants.
Motion allowed.
Cited: S. c., 123 N.C. 59; Chambers v. R. R., 172 N.C. 560, 561.