Court Opinion

ID: 2740833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-08 19:07:10.988983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:04:13.227638
License: Public Domain

People v Nunez (2014 NY Slip Op 06806)
People v Nunez
2014 NY Slip Op 06806
Decided on October 8, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on October 8, 2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentWILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

2013-01741

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent, 
vRoger Nunez, appellant. Thomas N. N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kristen A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated January 3, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
"A defendant seeking a downward departure has the initial burden of  (1) identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, namely, a factor which tends to establish a lower likelihood of reoffense or danger to the community, and is of a kind or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] Guidelines, and (2) establishing the facts in support of its existence by a preponderance of the evidence'" (People v Roldan, 111 AD3d 909, 910, quoting People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that, contrary to his primary argument on appeal, the defendant failed to meet his burden in this respect (see People v Wortham, 119 AD3d 666; People v Wood, 112 AD3d 602).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the County Court properly denied the defendant's application for a downward departure from his designation as a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court