Court Opinion

ID: 20182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:31:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:04.411305
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                        _______________________

                              No.98-31372
                        _______________________

GARY R. DANOS,

                                                     Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                  versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET. AL.,

                                                               Defendants,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                      Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                    Lower Court No. 97-CV-2900-F
_________________________________________________________________

                              March 3, 2000

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

            The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record.

While it appears that the district court misspoke concerning the

standards of proof in this maritime injury case, the error was

harmless.    There was insufficient evidence to support a verdict

finding causation of appellant’s respiratory problems by any toxic

exposure to fluorescein dye on board the DIAMOND STATE.             Without

evidence that appellant was exposed to the dye in a toxic amount,

     *
            Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
appellant’s case fails.   The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

            AFFIRMED.

                               2