Court Opinion

ID: 4398799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-21 15:02:46.095288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:06.775648
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                          No. 1D19-1333
                  _____________________________

VICTOR HICKS,

    Petitioner,

    v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH,

    Respondent.
                  _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

                          May 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

     The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
(holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling
on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has
noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
                  _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections,
Tallahassee, for Respondent.

                                    2