Court Opinion

ID: 4208695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-03 19:00:55.745497+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:06.622080
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Jay Bonanza Briley appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a reduction in sentence, for summary judgment, and for production of sealed records for use in his civil case, and granting the Government’s motion to seal an exhibit Briley filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Briley,
  
  No. 1:12-cr-00482-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 16, 2017; entered May 17, 2017). We deny Briley’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED