Court Opinion

ID: 2660287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-03 04:22:49.386618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:40:53.725507
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

YIE.,.ED

RONALD GRAHAM, §  3 g will
) Clerk, U,S. District & Bankruptcy
Plaintiff, ) Courts forthe District cf Columt)ia
)
v Civil Action No.
§ \”§-' \¢<@*l
ROBERT N. NORRINGTON, et al. , )
)
Defendants. )
)
MEMORANDUM OPINI()N

'l`his matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and
his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Plaintiff brings this action against three employees of the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development, apparently, in their individual capacities. While the complaint
appears to allege discriminatory policies of the agency, it fails to state what actions the individual
defendants have taken to cause the harm plaintiff allegedly suffers. Absent factual allegations
from which the Court may make a "reasonable inference that [a] defendant is liable for the
misconduct alleged," Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v.

Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 (2007)), the complaint fails to . - ` against any of the

  

DATE:

nited\States District Judge