Court Opinion

ID: 85945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 15:59:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:47.168288
License: Public Domain

34 U.S. 571 (____)
9 Pet. 571
THE LIFE AND FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
v.
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS.
Supreme Court of United States.

Mr Justice BALDWIN was of opinion, that in a cause of this sort, the court ought not to dispense with the regular course of proceedings, by the granting and service of a rule to show cause.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL said, that the grant of a rule to show cause and the service thereof, is a matter in the discretion of the court. The court may, in its discretion, grant an alternative mandamus, if it deems it more conducive to public *572 justice, and to prevent delays. Here all the parties express themselves ready to proceed in the cause. The district judge waives any formal rule and notice, and wishes no delay; and states his readiness now to show cause. Under such circumstances, all the purposes of a rule to show cause and notice are accomplished, and there is no necessity for directing such a rule and notice. The court, therefore, in my opinion, may properly proceed at once to the hearing of the cause, for the purpose of ascertaining whether a mandamus ought or ought not to be awarded.
The other judges concurred in the opinion of the chief justice; and the court directed the motion to come up on the next motion day.