Court Opinion

ID: 9789660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:39:52.480925+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:23.902406
License: Public Domain

SUMMERS, Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I dissent from the Court’s treatment of postjudgment interest in Part I of the opinion. I would hold that the rate of such interest recoverable under 12 O.S.1981 § 727 varies with subsequent amendments of that statute. I would thus overrule Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co., 713 P.2d 589 (Okl.1985) on that subject, and do so for the reasons stated in Justice Kauger’s concurring opinion in Fleming v. Baptist General Convention, et al., 742 P.2d 1087 (Okl.1987). As to the remainder of the opinion I concur.
I am authorized to state that DOOLIN, C.J., joins in the views expressed herein.