Court Opinion

ID: 2803946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-27 21:11:37.156829+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:29:50.258429
License: Public Domain

J-S28041-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

MALIK SABOR ROSS                                IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                      PENNSYLVANIA
                         Appellant

                    v.

ROBERT GILMORE

                         Appellee                     No. 2048 MDA 2014

               Appeal from the Order Entered October 7, 2014
               In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County
                      Civil Division at No(s): 2014-3738

BEFORE: BOWES, J., ALLEN, J., and LAZARUS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.:                          FILED MAY 27, 2015

      On September 29, 2014, Malik Sabor Ross filed a petition for writ of

habeas corpus and a petition to proceed in forma pauperis in the Civil

Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County.         On October 7,

2014, the trial court dismissed both petitions and directed Ross to refile

them in the court’s criminal division.

      In his petition for habeas corpus, Ross raises issues related to the

legality of his current sentence of incarceration.    Accordingly, his petition

should properly have been filed under the criminal docket number of the

case for which he is serving his sentence.

      Section 5103 of the Judicial Code provides, in relevant part, as follows:

      § 5103. Transfer of erroneously filed matters

      (a) General rule. -- If an appeal or other matter is taken to or
      brought in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth
J-S28041-15

      which does not have jurisdiction of the appeal or other matter,
      the court or district justice shall not quash such appeal or
      dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the record thereof to the
      proper tribunal of this Commonwealth, where the appeal or other
      matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the transferee
      tribunal on the date when the appeal or other matter was first
      filed in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth. . . .

                                      ...

      (c) Interdivisional transfers. -- If an appeal or other matter is
      taken to, brought in, or transferred to a division of a court to
      which such matter is not allocated by law, the court shall not
      quash such appeal or dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the
      record thereof to the proper division of the court, where the
      appeal or other matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the
      transferee division on the date first filed in a court or magisterial
      district.

42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5103.

      The language of section 5103 is absolute, admitting to no exceptions.

Lucidore v. Novak, 570 A.2d 93, 95 (Pa. Super. 1990). It states that a

court lacking jurisdiction shall transfer the action.   Id. (emphasis added).

Further, the language states that a matter brought before the incorrect

division may not be dismissed. Id.

                                      -2-
J-S28041-15

     Accordingly, the order dismissing Ross’ petition for writ of habeas

corpus and petition to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby reversed and the

case is remanded to the criminal trial division of the Court of Common Pleas

of Centre County for further proceedings. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary

Date: 5/27/2015

                                    -3-