Court Opinion

ID: 5143019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-01 17:20:45.811364+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:38.414870
License: Public Domain

Clayton, J.
With- the exception of the fact that in this case the ward of the appellee Linebach is Jackson Hood, and the co-defendant of Lafayette is Babbs, and the premises mentioned in the complaint are different, the pleadings, the facts, and the orders and-decrees are identical with the case of Lafayette et al vs Hood et al. (No. 847) 104 S. W. 853, and *616therefore the opinion in that case, this ■ day handed down,, is referred to and adopted as the opinion in this case, and, for the errors therein mentioned, the same also existing in this case, the decree of the court below is reversed and remanded.
Gill, C. J., and Townsend, J., concur.