Court Opinion

ID: 8442065
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:05:20.615093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:50.385705
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint and numerous post-judgment motions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Mitchell, No. 1:10-cv-00186-RJC, 2010 WL 4027773 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14) & 2010 WL 5441668 (Dec. 28, 2010) & (June 22, 2011). We deny Tompkins’ motion to compel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.