Court Opinion

ID: 2787852
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-20 15:01:36.446861+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:13.606505
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s orders denying authorization
   
   *178
   
  to file six civil actions and denying his motions for recusal and to amend his pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. Willis is required to file a motion for leave to file a complaint in the Eastern District of North Carolina under pre-filing injunctions imposed by this court and the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   In re: Willis,
  
  Nos. 4:13-mc-00005-H; 4:13-mc-00006-H; 4:13-mc-00007-H; 4:13-mc-00008-H; 4:14-mc-00001-H; 4:14-mc-00002-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12
  
   &
  
  Sept. 15, 2014). We deny Willis’s motion to file the appeal under the pre-filing injunction, or for permission to appeal, as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.