Court Opinion

ID: 7182805
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:49:49.178268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:58.292617
License: Public Domain

The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Rost, J.
The plaintiff claims three hundred dollars and costs, this being the amount of a judgment rendered against him in favor of T. Ef. Howard, Esq., for professional services as attorney at law, on the ground that those services were rendered for the benefit of the defendant, whose tutor the plaintiff then was.
The defendant alleges, and it was held by the district court, that the services of Mr. Howard, were rendered to the plaintiff himself, and that he alone was liable for them. He has appealed.
Mr. Bartlette was the regular counsel who attended to the minor’s interest, and he received for it a fee of $500, which is a very ample compensation for any services he is shown to have rendered.
In one instance, Mr. Howard signed a petition in behalf of the minor jointly with Mr. Bartlette, and in another they took a rule together against his former tutor. But no further steps appear to have been taken either on the petition or the rule; and all the other services for which Mr. Howard has obtained compensation were rendered to the plaintiff personally.
We are not satisfied of the necessity or propriety of subjecting the minor to the expense of two counsels in proceedings simple in themselves, and which do not appear to have led to any result; but if we should be in error in this, the value of the services rendered is not shown, and must be a sum far below our jurisdiction. The plaintiff cannot be permitted to evade the constitutional provision which limits that jurisdiction, by mixing up claims against himself with those he may have against the defendant.
The appeal is therefore dismissed, with costs.