Court Opinion

ID: 9459025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:08:15.02768+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:59.053497
License: Public Domain

McCREE, Circuit Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I agree that the District Judge was not required to recuse himself. However, I adhere to the view expressed in my dissenting opinion on the occasion of appellants’ previous appeal, see United States v. Hoffa, 437 F.2d 11, 19 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988, 91 S.Ct. 1664, 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971), that appellants are entitled to a hearing on the question whether Partin’s testimony was false and known to be false by the Government.