Court Opinion

ID: 844741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 22:53:57.49628+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:08.957167
License: Public Domain

722 N.W.2d 888 (2006)
Charles STARKS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MICHIGAN WELDING SPECIALISTS, INC., and August F. Pitonyak, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 130283. COA No. 257127.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 1, 2006.
*889 On October 11, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Where, as here, a successor corporation acquires the assets of a predecessor corporation and does not explicitly assume the liabilities of the predecessor, the traditional rule of corporate successor non-liability applies. See, Foster v. Cone-Blanchard Machine Co., 460 Mich. 696, 702, 597 N.W.2d 506 (1999). Because an exception designed to protect injured victims of defective products rests upon policy reasons not applicable to a judgment creditor, the Court declines to expand the exception to the traditional rule set forth in Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 397 Mich. 406, 244 N.W.2d 873 (1976), to cases in which the plaintiff is a judgment creditor.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal. The issue of whether the continuity of the enterprise doctrine recognized in Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 397 Mich. 406, 244 N.W.2d 873 (1976), extends beyond products liability actions warrants further discussion and closer attention from this Court.