Court Opinion

ID: 5816677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 20:06:44.086501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:01.147190
License: Public Domain

*445Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered August 24, 2009, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and for sanctions to the extent of awarding costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The issue whether plaintiff was wrongfully deprived of its use of the subject premises was fully and fairly litigated, and necessarily decided, in the prior Civil Court proceeding (see Ryan v New York Tel. Co., 62 NY2d 494, 500 [1984]). Plaintiffs eviction was based on uncured lease violations alone and had no connection to the wrongs it alleges against defendants in this action.
We find that plaintiffs conduct in commencing this action was frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Moskowitz and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 31937(U).]