Court Opinion

ID: 9719455
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:53:25.352494+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:21.764723
License: Public Domain

KING, J.
I concur in the result because Peat Marwick’s petition challenges the trial court’s order of April 17, and this order was mooted by the trial court’s subsequent order of June 22. Our Supreme Court directed us to issue an alternative writ apparently not perceiving that the petition before it challenges an order which had been mooted by a later order. Peat Marwick has filed no challenge to the June 22 order and the Supreme Court’s direction to issue an alternative writ on Peat Marwick’s challenge to the April 17 order applies only to that order.
A petition for a rehearing was denied May 13, 1988, and petitioner’s application for review by the Supreme Court was denied July 28, 1988.