Court Opinion

ID: 216834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-05-17 17:12:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:30.087927
License: Public Domain

Case: 10-10657 Document: 00511479715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2011

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            May 17, 2011
                                     No. 10-10657
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ANTONIO VERA-RAMIREZ,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:10-CR-15-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Antonio Vera-
Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vera-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.
Although counsel’s discussion of the substantive reasonableness of the sentence
is arguably insufficient, we concur with counsel’s ultimate assessment that the

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-10657 Document: 00511479715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2011

                               No. 10-10657

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.    Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR.
R. 42.2.

                                     2