Court Opinion

ID: 2676049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-05-28 19:03:13.168738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:55.313648
License: Public Domain

No. 13-0766 – Larry Tabata, et al v. Charleston Area Medical Center, et al.
                                                                                   FILED
                                                                                May 28, 2014
                                                                                released at 3:00 p.m.

                                                                              RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

                                                                            SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

                                                                                 OF WEST VIRGINIA

Justice Ketchum, dissenting:

        This case is a typical example of a frivolous class-action lawsuit. The named plaintiffs’

lawyer admitted during oral argument that discovery did not reveal that any of his client’s

medical records or personal information was accessed or viewed by any unauthorized person.

As soon as it was discovered the information was placed accidently on the internet it was

removed before any unauthorized person viewed the named plaintiffs’ records. The majority

opinion concedes that discovery reveals the named plaintiffs have suffered no injury.

        No harm, no foul. The plaintiffs lack standing to sue or represent a class of unnamed

plaintiffs.

        Although the majority allows class certification, our law is clear that if discovery reveals

that no unnamed member of the class has suffered harm that the trial judge should decertify the

class action and dismiss the suit. Of course, this cannot occur until massive amounts of attorney

fees are incurred by the defendants conducting discovery relating to more than 3,000 unnamed

class members.

         Therefore, I dissent.