Court Opinion

ID: 9527579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:31:40.040501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:54.951864
License: Public Domain

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING Mr. JUSTICE KARNS delivered the opinion of the court:  The defendant has filed a petition for rehearing calling to the court’s attention its failure to address, at least explicitly, the issue raised by defendant that the failure to provide the periodic reviews required by statute and discussed in our opinion was “a denial of due process in and of itself, aside from the issue of whether such failure was a denial of the defendant’s right to a speedy trial.” We feel that our opinion implicitly holds, in our discussion of the other constitutional issues raised by defendant, that the failure to provide the periodic statutory reviews under the facts of this case was not a denial of due process. The petition for rehearing is therefore denied. EBERSPACHER, P. J., and HICKMAN, J., concur.