Court Opinion

ID: 994171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:18:38.567189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:34.172284
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-2440

SAMUEL D. QUINN,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-97-695-R)

Submitted:   January 22, 1998             Decided:   February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel D. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Samuel D. Quinn appeals the district court's order dismissing

his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (West 1994

& Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Quinn v. Franklin
Cnty Board of Supervisors, No. CA-97-695-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 15,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2