Court Opinion

ID: 4100113
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-18 20:10:57.790844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:13:08.668634
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1000
KA 14-02131
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

                      V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DARRYL ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF
COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A.
MILLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P.
Franczyk, J.), rendered October 21, 2014. The judgment convicted
defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the second
degree.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed.

     Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him
upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree
(Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [3]). We reject defendant’s contention
that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. “[T]he record
demonstrates that County Court engage[d] the defendant in an adequate
colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a
knowing and voluntary choice” (People v Burt, 101 AD3d 1729, 1730, lv
denied 20 NY3d 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant’s
valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that
the sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d
248, 256; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v
Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered:    November 18, 2016                      Frances E. Cafarell
                                                   Clerk of the Court