Court Opinion

ID: 9549673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:23:05.011788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:20:43.735662
License: Public Domain

Mr. Chief Justice BLUME,
concurring.
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice PARKER, but I want to add a word. I recognize the rule that requirements in connection with, constructive service must be strictly construed, but the strict construction does not mean that idle ceremonies must be given any consideration. When our legislature attempted to amend our statute in connection with constructive service by requiring notice to be sent by registered mail, it intended to malee certain that the party to be so served should receive the notice, nothing more. If then the party to be served actually receives the notice through the party authorized by law to serve and send it, the intent of the legislature has been fully subserved.