Court Opinion

ID: 4237279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-17 21:25:50.841062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:13.851903
License: Public Domain

ORDER
 

  PER CURIAM
 

  AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for-Allowance of Appeal is .GRANTED, 'LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
 

  (1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the decision of the trial court which found the [Respondent’s] witness competent to testify and received evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule?
 

  (2) As to the contested evidence received by the Court, will a grant of allocatur, here, resolve the conflict between both U.S. Bank v. Pauten-is; Boyle v. Steiman and Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Smith as to the admissibility of witness testimony at a debt collection trial?