Court Opinion

ID: 4456785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-19 01:00:18.437016+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:27.394208
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10090      Document: 00515203471         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/18/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 19-10090
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        November 18, 2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BAQUAVIOUS RIVERS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:17-CR-460-10

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Baquavious Rivers has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Rivers has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10090    Document: 00515203471    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/18/2019

                                No. 19-10090

      Our review reveals a clerical error in the written judgment concerning
the indictment to which Rivers pleaded guilty. The judgment erroneously
states that Rivers pleaded guilty to Count One of “the indictment filed on
September 12, 2017,” rather than Count One of the second superseding
indictment filed January 9, 2018.
      Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited
purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P.
36; United States v. Johnson, 588 F.2d 961, 964 (5th Cir. 1979).

                                      2