Court Opinion

ID: 1004652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:44:19.852139+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:13.682997
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6422

FRED LEE RUSH,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. E. GUNJA, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
01-539-DKC)

Submitted:   May 31, 2001                  Decided:   June 11, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Lee Rush, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Fred Lee Rush appeals the district court’s order dismissing

without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.    Because

the relief Rush seeks must be brought by way of a motion filed

under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), we affirm on the dis-

trict court’s reasoning.   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Rush v. Gunja,

No. CA-01-539-DKC (D. Md. March 1, 2001).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2