Court Opinion

ID: 2542923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:17:52.869895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:46.403449
License: Public Domain

341 S.W.3d 737 (2011)
Jeremy KING, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94808.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 17, 2011.
Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and GARY DIAL, Sp. J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy King appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).