Court Opinion

ID: 9670683
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:24:12.529801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:05.933059
License: Public Domain

White, J.
(concurring). I agree, for the reasons stated by the majority, that in the present case, *355the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission did not err in concluding that defendant properly could reduce benefits under MCL 418.357; MSA 17.237(357). I would not, however, adopt or reject the "general rule of Krueger [v Simplicity Pattern Co, 196 Mich App 212; 492 NW2d 790 (1992).]” Ante, p 352.
I join in part in of the majority opinion.