Court Opinion

ID: 7577301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:23:14.549596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:27.596430
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is reversed only with respect to the individual defendants H.W. Prahl, Jr. and R.A. Prahl. See McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So.2d 230 (Fla. *10941st DCA 1983), review denied, 440 So.2d 352 (Fla.1983). Since there is no other harmful error, the judgment against the remaining defendant-appellants is affirmed. Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla.1983); Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 844 F.2d 156 (4th Cir.1988); Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Sears v. Southern Pac. Co., 313 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963); Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 515 So.2d 198 (Fla.1987); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1987).