Court Opinion

ID: 4658041
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-02-05 21:09:13.716255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:15.345197
License: Public Domain

People v Hill (2021 NY Slip Op 00756)

People v Hill

2021 NY Slip Op 00756

Decided on February 5, 2021

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 5, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

1152 KA 18-00914

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vTHEODIS HILL, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAIXI XU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Emilio L. Colaiacovo, J.), rendered January 17, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: In appeal Nos. 1 and 2, defendant appeals from two judgments, each convicting him upon his plea of guilty during a single plea proceeding of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentences (see People v Baker, 158 AD3d 1296, 1296 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 1011 [2018]), we conclude in each appeal that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: February 5, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court