Court Opinion

ID: 7440275
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:04:32.590757+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:34.877696
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, which was affirmed by this court on direct appeal [Brooks v. State, Fla.App., 172 So.2d 876 (1965)], is affirmed. See Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.