Court Opinion

ID: 7417993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:38:45.384865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:17.765186
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 9, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
*170The petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.