Court Opinion

ID: 7748144
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:14:08.277628+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:38.016603
License: Public Domain

BARFIELD, J.
Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla.2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.