Court Opinion

ID: 5754724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:04:25.568045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:23.272717
License: Public Domain

Order, entered December 4, 1964, denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]) unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to abide the event. The New York rule with respect to the liability of a vendor of real property for personal injuries sustained subsequent to the transfer of title but allegedly due to pre-existing conditions is unclear (cf. Kilmer v. White, 254 N. Y. 64; Restatement, Torts, § 352; but see Pharm v. Lituchy, 283 N. Y. 130 and eases cited in Restatement, Second, Torts, § 353, p. 121 [Tentative Draft No. 5, April 8, I960]). In the light of this uncertainty and the absence of any facts to establish the time required to install automatic sprinklers, none of the questions should be resolved on the pleadings alone *435without a trial record. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, J,J.