Court Opinion

ID: 1004870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:47:56.44181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:35.479636
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6645

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM T. DAVIS, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.   C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
(CR-97-682, CA-99-2192-4-12)

Submitted:   July 12, 2001                 Decided:   July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Hechtkopf, Robert
Esten Lindsay, Gregory Victor Davis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William T. Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-97-682; CA-

99-2192-4-12 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2