Court Opinion

ID: 1027706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:28:14.896505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:33.586723
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                No. 08-2193

GILBERT L. SPURLOCK,

                  Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

CAROL A. CASTO; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

                  Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington.  Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00750)

Submitted:    January 5, 2009                 Decided:   January 21, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order

accepting     in   part   the    report   and     recommendation    of     the

magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of

jurisdiction.       We    have   reviewed   the     record   and   find     no

reversible    error.      Accordingly,    although    we   grant   leave   to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court.        See Spurlock v. Casto, No. 3:07-cv-00750

(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 16, 2008).          We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                     2