Court Opinion

ID: 1006784
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:16:12.08844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:37.463073
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-7919

WINFIELD DACOST SPEEDE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BARBRA GIBSON, Supervisor,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-526)

Submitted:   February 14, 2002          Decided:    February 27, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winfield Dacost Speede, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Winfield Dacost Speede appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court.   See Speede v. Gibson, No. CA-01-526 (E.D.

Va. Oct. 29, 2001).   We deny Speede’s motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2