Court Opinion

ID: 6475227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-26 22:35:47.155606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:53:57.381622
License: Public Domain

PEB CUBIAM.
The qaestion for review in this case is the same as that in case No. 3945, Udall v. Severn, ante, p. 65, 79 Pac. (2d) 347, and is controlled by the decision jnst handed down in that case. Under the stipalation of coansel it was sabmitted apon the same briefs and statement of facts.
The same order will be made as in case No. 3945.
McALISTEB, C. J., and BOSS and LOCKWOOD, JJ., concar.