Court Opinion

ID: 993726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:11:56.980439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:55.211962
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-1546

GARY J. WINTON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

AM-PRO PROTECTIVE AGENCY, INCORPORATED,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-96-1119-A)

Submitted:   November 20, 1997            Decided:   December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary J. Winton, Appellant Pro Se.      Lance A. Mueller, AM-PRO
PROTECTIVE AGENCY, INC., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary

judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment discrim-

ination and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Winton v. Am-Pro Protective Agy., No. CA-96-1119-A
(E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2