Court Opinion

ID: 9548471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:03:56.953181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:19:00.905363
License: Public Domain

URBIGKIT, Justice,
concurring.
I concur.
However, by concurrence it is not intended to presume the validity of the Nevada divorce as the dispositive issue on appeal. Appellant had the burden of the attack on the validity of the Nevada judgment, which was not met by evidence or argument. The record affords, at most, modest conviction that with proper attack the divorce decree would have survived that jurisdictional attack based upon the affidavit upon which it was premised. Jurists’ suspicions, however, are not a substitute for facts demonstrated by appellate record, including an adequate proof of the law of venue.