Court Opinion

ID: 1005532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:55.959007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:41.683010
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 99-7269

RYLAND LEE HARVEY,

                                                Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

LONNIE M. SAUNDERS,

                                                 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-1387-AM)

Submitted:   October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryland Lee Harvey, Appellant Pro Se.     Robert H. Anderson, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ryland Lee Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Harvey v. Saunders, No. CA-98-

1387-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 10, 1999; entered Aug. 11, 1999); see

also Crawley v. Catoe, 257 F.3d 395 (4th Cir. 2001).*   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

     *
       This appeal was originally placed in abeyance for No.
00-6187, Atkinson v. Angelone.

                                 2