Court Opinion

ID: 9907452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-06 16:04:46.068375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:23.333682
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CLARENCE E. GIBBS,                              :       C.A. No. S23M-12-002 RHR

                Petitioner,                     :

        v.                                      :

BRIAN EMIG, WARDEN, H.R.Y.C.,                   :

                Respondent.                     :

                          ORDER DENYING PETITION SEEKING

                                WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

        1) Clarence E. Gibbs (“petitioner”) has filed a petition seeking the issuance of a writ

of habeas corpus.

        2) Petitioner is incarcerated on the case of State v. Gibbs, Def. ID# 2107007172. He

is serving a Level 5 sentence for a violation of probation on a felony driving under the

influence conviction.

        3) Petitioner asserts that the bond amount set on his administrative warrant for

violating his probation constituted cruel and unusual punishment. This assertion does not

give him a right to a writ of habeas corpus.

        4) As the Supreme Court has explained:

          Under Delaware law, the writ of habeas corpus provides relief on a very
        limited basis. Specifically, it provides a prisoner with a means of challenging
        an allegedly unlawful detention on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction of the
        court ordering the commitment. When the commitment is regular on its face
        and the court clearly had jurisdiction over the subject matter, habeas corpus
        does not afford a remedy to the petitioner.1

1
 Smith v. Akinbayo, 263 A.3d 1014, 2021 WL 4839315, *1 (Del. Oct. 15, 2021) (Footnotes and
citations omitted) (TABLE).

                                               1
        Furthermore, “[u]nder Section 6902 of Title 10 of the Delaware Code, habeas corpus

relief is not available to a petitioner who is ‘committed or detained on a charge of treason or

felony, the species whereof is plainly and fully set forth in the commitment.’”2

        5) The Level 5 commitment in this case is regular on its face and Superior Court has

jurisdiction over the subject matter. Petitioner is not being illegally detained and he fails to

state a claim upon which a writ of habeas corpus may be issued.

        NOW, THEREFORE, THIS _____ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

        1) Petitioner is not being illegally detained;

        2) Petitioner fails to state a claim for a writ of habeas corpus; and

        3) The petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

                                                         _/s/ Robert H. Robinson, Jr.______
                                                                    JUDGE

cc: Prothonotary’s Office
   Clarence E. Gibbs, SBI# 00155591, H.R.Y.C.I., 1301 East 12th St., Wilmington, DE
19801

2
 Walls v. Phelps, 192 A.3d 554, 2018 WL 3689309, *1 (Del. Aug. 1, 2018), rearg. den. (Aug. 21,
2018) (TABLE).

                                                 2