Court Opinion

ID: 9849380
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:39:16.201722+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:21.365809
License: Public Domain

Banke, Judge,
concurring specially.
1. I concur with the judgment of affirmance.
2. While the dissent of Judge Smith contains considerable merit, based on Yawn v. State, 134 Ga. App. 77 (2) (213 SE2d 178), I read the defendant’s motion to suppress and found the state carried its burden as to each ground stated therein. The transcript contains no offer to amend instanter. Further, from my view of the evidence, it was established that the automobile was used in the commission of a crime and thus became legally searchable under Abrams v. State, 223 Ga. 216 (154 SE2d 443).