Court Opinion

ID: 9941844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-17 18:12:01.663392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:11.380923
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00417-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

DENNIS EBORKA,                                                              Appellant,

                                                v.

DOUGLAS STOVES,                                                               Appellee.

              On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                       of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
 Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina
              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

      This cause is before the Court on its own motion due to appellant’s failure to file a

compliant brief. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 27, 2023 and several

amended notices of appeal thereafter.

      On February 5, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his brief did not

comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(3),
38.1(a), 38.1(b), 38.1(c), 38.1(g), 38.1(h), 38.1(k). Appellant filed three amdended briefs

with numerous defects.

       On February 6, 2024, the Clerk of the Court advised appellant that if appellant did

not file an amended brief, his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.

See id. 42.3. Appellant filed another amended brief, and the defects have not been cured.

Appellant’s brief has numerous formal defects and does not comply with the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure. See id. 9.1(b), 9.4(h), 38.1(b), 38.1(c), 38.1(g), 38.1(i),

38.1(k)(1)(A)(C).

       Accordingly, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.9(a), we

hereby strike appellant’s brief, and prohibit appellant from filing another brief. See id. 38.9.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and appellant’s failure to comply with this

Court’s directive and the appellate rules.1 See id. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c).

                                                                             JAIME TIJERINA
                                                                             Justice

Delivered and filed on the
15th day of February, 2024.

       1 Appellant’s pending motion for emergency relief is hereby denied.

                                                  2