Court Opinion

ID: 539452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:44:47.472564
License: Public Domain

900 F.2d 253Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Vernon Wayne MAULDIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Doctor LEATHERMAN;  Ray Drewry;  Gary T. Dixon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6001.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  March 5, 1990.Decided:  March 22, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-480-CRT)
Vernon Wayne Mauldin, appellant pro se.
Lucien Capone, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Vernon Wayne Mauldin appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Mauldin v. Leatherman, CA-88-480-CRT (E.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED