Court Opinion

ID: 6948616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:28:34.47525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:00.224489
License: Public Domain

Spates, C. J. The scire facias serves the double office of process and declaration, in cases like this, and should be good and sufficient for each purpose. This is not sufficient for either, on default. The constitution requires all process to run in the name of the people of the State; and this is not issued by such authority. In its office as a pleading, the scire facias should show, by a proper recital of the recognizance, when it so appears upon its face, or by proper averments, that the recognizance was matter of record, and had legally, become so; for scire facias only lies upon matter of record. This recognizance recited was entered into before a justice of the peace, but has never been returned, filed and made a matter of record. It is not to be implied from the order of forfeiture and award of the scire facias; it must be shown or averred in it. Both are substantive defects. Judgment reversed.