Court Opinion

ID: 8450462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:02:17.271925+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.073458
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Abdou-Malik Yacoubou Adam seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and denying his motion to expedite. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Adam seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.