Court Opinion

ID: 2926040
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:21:53.112934+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:08.366547
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00239-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
REAL AZTECA INN, L.L.C. AND 
RICARDO DE LA MORA, 	Appellants,

v.

FIRST VISTA INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.,	Appellee. 
	____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 206th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on August 21, 2009.  On October
5, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed
and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been
received from appellants.  
	Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file their brief, or file their brief.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 
										PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
10th day of December, 2009.