Court Opinion

ID: 5561276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:51:03.058749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:29.028090
License: Public Domain

Blandeord, Justice.
The question presented by the record is, whether the salary of an officer of a railroad corporation which exceeds five hundred dollars is subject to garnishment.
The act of 1850 declares that the officers of all corporations, except municipal corporations, where the salaries exceed five hundred dollars, are subject to garnishment. Cobb’s New Digest, p. 88.
Thus the law is written. If this act of 1850 has been repealed, we have been unable to find the repealing act, and the astute counsel who argued the case for defendants in error have been unable to call ofir attention to any such act. The act of 1855-6, upon the subject of attachment and garnishment, has been suggested as showing a repeal of the act of 1850, but wherein the learned counsel saith not. The act of 1855-6 only regulates the process of attachment and garnishment, but does not interfere with the subject of garnishment, which was left as it stood before the passage of the act.
The act of 1845, Cobb’s Digest, 88, exempts the wages of journeyman mechanics and day laborers, as to their daily, weekly or monthly wages in the hands of their employers.
The act of 1872, pamphlet, page 43, so far modified and *742changed the act of 1845, as to make the wages of a person in the employment, of another subject to garnishment., where the consideration of the debt was for provisions for the use of the employé and his family. The act of 1875 further amended the act of 1845 and the act of 1872, so as to make wages subject to garnishment, where the consideration of the debt was for services rendered by a physician or surgeon. Pamphlet, page 21.
The act of 1875, pamphlet, page 17 (Code, §3554), in effect, repeals the acts of 1872 and 1875, and restores in full force and vigor the act of 1845. It will be seen that none of these acts operate upon the act of 1850, and they leave it in full force.
The court erred in discharging the garnishee and refusing the new trial.
Judgment reversed.