Court Opinion

ID: 9957127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-03 18:02:59.39634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:07.361665
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                         No. 1D2023-0835
                  _____________________________

CYNTHIA ARISTIZABAL,

    Appellant,

    v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and
JOSE ALBERTO VASQUEZ,

    Appellees.
                  _____________________________

On appeal from the Department of Revenue Child Support
Program.
Brittany O. Finkbeiner, Administrative Law Judge.

                            April 3, 2024

PER CURIAM.

     Because the appellant has failed to meet her burden to
demonstrate reversible error, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett
Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“When
there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the
reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a
record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly
resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial
court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an
alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither
can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so
misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
    AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Catherine Gleason, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department
of Revenue.

Luis Enrique Diaz, Miami, for Appellee Alberto Vasquez.

                                2