Court Opinion

ID: 2929983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 00:15:33.785042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:39:41.470330
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 19, 2004

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 19, 2004.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-03-01416-CR
____________
 
MARVIN
JOHNSON, JR., Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the
56th District Court
Galveston
County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
98CR0794
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O
P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to commit
aggravated assault and was placed on three years= deferred adjudication probation on
August 20, 2001.  The trial court revoked
his deferred adjudication probation and, on November 19, 2003, the trial court
sentenced appellant to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 
Appellant filed a written notice of appeal.  

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit as to any issue Aunrelated@ to appellant=s conviction.  See Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880,
885 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2001).  Counsel also notes that this court has no
jurisdiction over an appeal from a trial court=s decision to adjudicate guilt.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a
professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro
se response has been filed.
We agree the appeal of issues unrelated to conviction is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Additionally, we do not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal related to
the conviction.   Vidaurri, 49
S.W.3d at 884.  Further, we find no
reversible error in the record.  A
discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed August 19, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Yates,
Edelman, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).