Court Opinion

ID: 9387292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-17 16:07:28.391804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:12.613137
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued April 13, 2023.

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                    For The

                          First District of Texas
                            ————————————
                              NO. 01-22-00644-CV
                           ———————————
                       JEREMY BIGELOW, Appellant
                                       V.
   BERNARDO SANCHEZ RAMOS, ONAR MISLEH, AND KRISTINA
                   MISLEH, Appellees

                   On Appeal from the 151st District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Case No. 2021-18064

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Jeremy Bigelow (“Bigelow”) appeals from the trial court’s June 13,

2022 final judgment. Bigelow filed a timely notice of appeal on September 1, 2022.

On September 7, 2022, the Clerk of the Court sent Bigelow’s counsel and Appellees’
counsel the Court’s standard general information letter acknowledging the filing of

the notice of appeal and notifying the parties about appellate procedures, including

payment of fees and the filing of a docketing statement, clerk’s record, and reporter’s

record. With respect to the required appellate filing fee, the letter states:

      Unless an appellant is exempt from paying filing fees or has established
      an inability to pay filing fees, the appellant must pay the required $205
      filing fee to prosecute the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring
      payment of fees in civil cases unless excused) and 20.1 (listing
      requirements for establishing an inability to pay costs).

      This letter is NOTICE to the appellant that the required filing fee must
      be paid within twenty (20) days of the date of this notice. . . .

With respect to the clerk’s record and reporter’s record, the letter states:

      This letter is NOTICE to the appellant that the Court may dismiss an
      appeal for want of prosecution, if the clerk’s record is not filed and it is
      appellant’s fault. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3. . . .

      To obtain the clerk’s record and reporter’s record without payment of
      costs, a party must file a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of
      Court Costs and establish an inability to pay cost in the trial court. See
      Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Unless an appellant has established an inability to
      pay costs in the trial, the trial-court clerk and court reporter are not
      required to file the clerk’s and reporter’s records until appellant has paid
      the required fees to prepare and certify the records, or has made
      satisfactory arrangements to pay the fees. See TEX. R. APP. P.
      35.3(a)(2), (b)(3).

      ...

      [T]he trial court clerk is due to file the clerk’s record and the court
      reporter is due to file the reporter’s record on or before Tuesday,
      October 11, 2022.

The letter also notified Bigelow that he was required to file a docketing statement:

                                           2
      An appellant is required to file a docketing statement. See TEX. R.
      APP. P. 32.1. Until the clerk’s record is filed, the docketing statement
      is the primary source of accurate information about a newly-filed
      appeal. The information is used to establish appellate deadlines and to
      send notices to the correct parties at the correct addresses. The “Forms”
      section of the Court’s website includes a docketing statement or the
      appellant may call the Clerk’s office and ask that one be mailed. In this
      case, the Docketing Statement should be filed within twenty (20) days
      of the date of this notice.

      On September 28, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified Bigelow, who had yet

to pay the appellate filing fee, that:

      The case was filed in this Court on Tuesday, September 6, 2022. To
      date, our records show that Appellant has not paid the appellate filing
      fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5.

      Unless Appellant notifies the Court in writing on or before Friday,
      October 28, 2022 as to why Appellant should not pay the fee, or pays
      the appellate filing fee on or before Friday, October 28, 2022, the
      Court may dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

      On October 17, 2022, the Court issued an order directing the official court

reporter “to file the record in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this

order.” On October 18, 2022, the official court reporter filed an information sheet

in which she advised the Court that there is a reporter’s record, but Bigelow, who

was not appealing as indigent, had not requested that the record be prepared, or paid

or made arrangements to pay for the record.

      On October 18, 2022, the Court notified Bigelow that the court reporter had

not filed the reporter’s record by the October 11, 2022 deadline because Bigelow

                                          3
failed to request a reporter’s record or failed to pay for or make arrangements to pay

the reporter’s fee to prepare it. The notice further stated:

      This is NOTICE that the Court may require you to file your brief and
      can consider and decide your appeal on those issues or points that do
      not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P.
      37.3(c). The final deadline to submit written evidence from the court
      reporter that you have paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s
      fee for preparing the reporter’s record is 5:00 p.m., Thursday,
      November 17, 2022.

      On November 17, 2022, Bigelow filed a “response to letter dated October 18,

2022” in which he stated that he was attaching “evidence of payment of the

reporter’s record.” The attachment, however, reflected that Bigelow paid for the

clerk’s record on November 16, 2022.1

      On January 4, 2023, Appellees Bernardo Sanchez Ramos, Onar Misleh and

Kristina Misleh (“Appellees”) filed “Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal for

Failure to Comply with the Rules, Failure to Comply with the Court’s Orders, and

Failure to Prosecute the Appeal.” In their motion, Appellees argued that Bigelow’s

appeal should be dismissed pursuant to Rules 5 and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure because Bigelow failed to (1) pay the appellate filing fee, (2)

file a docketing statement, and (3) comply with several notices from the Clerk of the

Court. More than ten days have passed since Appellees filed their motion to dismiss,

and Bigelow has not responded to the motion.

1
      The District Clerk filed the clerk’s record on January 31, 2023.

                                            4
      Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states that a party who is

not excused from paying costs “must” pay filing fees that are “required by statute or

Supreme Court order” and appellate courts “may enforce the rule by any order that

is just.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (stating indigent party

who complies with Rule 20.1 may proceed without advance payment of costs). Rule

42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states that “on any party’s

motion—or on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties—the

appellate court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order,” if

“the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order,

or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified

time.” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

      The Court’s records reflect that Bigelow has not paid the required appellate

filing fee, or established indigence for purposes of appellate costs, despite being

given notice that his appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not pay the filing fee

or establish indigence by October 28, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (stating party who

is not excused from paying costs “must” pay filing fees “required by statute or

Supreme Court order” and authorizing appellate courts to “enforce rule by any order

that is just”); 20.1 (stating indigent party who complies with provisions of Rule 20.1

may proceed without advance payment of costs); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE

§§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court,

                                          5
in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-

District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158.         Bigelow also has not filed a

docketing statement or complied with, or responded to, the Court’s notices of

September 7, 2022 (setting deadlines to pay appellate filing fee and file docketing

statement), September 28, 2022 (notice of past due appellate filing fee), and October

18, 2022 (directing Bigelow to submit written evidence he had paid for or made

arrangements to pay reporter’s fee for preparing reporter’s record by November 17,

2022).2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1 (requiring appellant to file docketing statement in

appellate court); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (stating Court may dismiss appeal if

appellant “has failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a

notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time”).

Each of Bigelow’s omissions, standing alone, is sufficient grounds for the

involuntary dismissal of his appeal.

      Because Bigelow (1) failed to comply with Rules 5 and 32.1, and (2) failed to

comply with notices from the Clerk requiring a response within a specified time, we

2
      On November 17, 2022, Bigelow filed a “response to letter dated October 18, 2022”
      in which he states that he is attaching “evidence of payment of the reporter’s
      record.” The attachment, however, reflects that Bigelow paid for the clerk’s record
      on November 16, 2022. Thus, while the cover letter indicates that Bigelow is
      responding to the Court’s October 18 notice (related to the reporter’s record), the
      substance of the response indicates Bigelow is responding to the Court’s October
      17 notice concerning the clerk’s record.

                                           6
grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismiss Bigelow’s appeal pursuant to Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

                                        7