Court Opinion

ID: 5463071
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:42:53.08802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:58.919867
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

The defendants have not accounted for their delay; if that be not done, and the application be not immediately after the loches, the default is waived, and' cannot now be taken advantage of.(a)
Motioned denied, with costs.
Radcliff and Livingston, justices, absent.

 S. P. Gillet ads. Wilde, Col. Cas. 64. S. C., 1 Johns. Cas. 30. See also Mumford v. Col Ins. Co., 2 Cai. R. 251; Chapman v. Van Alstyne, Wen. 517 ; Harrison v. Stevens, 7 Wen. 519; Anon., 9 Wen. 461