Court Opinion

ID: 666111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:14:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:56.150085
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 1429
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Archie HODGE, Plaintiff Appellant,v.K. WEEDON, Deputy Warden;  L.J. Allen, RegionalAdministrator;  Thomas Smith, Deputy Warden;  MarkEaton, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7132.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 1994.Decided March 31, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.  (CA-91-2624-4-19BD)
Archie Hodge, appellant pro se.
William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Hodge v. Weedon, No. CA-91-2624-4-19BD (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We deny Appellant's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel