Court Opinion

ID: 9829952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:45:03.941704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:23.541110
License: Public Domain

On Second Motion for Rehearing.
The Atascosa County State Bank, filing its motion for rehearing, says, while it contends the facts are sufficient to justify the conclusion that the item of $1,300 should be recovered from the surety company, in case this motion is not granted, it does “hereby remit and tender a remittitur of $1,300 of the judgment rendered in its favor by the trial court against the National Surety Company, and does respectfully pray that such remitti-tur be allowed and accepted, and by virtue thereof the judgment of the trial court in favor of thé bank against the surety company be reformed and rendered, and judgment to stand for the amount allowed the bank against the surety company by the trial court, less said item of $1,300.”
The motion for rehearing is overruled, but, pursuant to the offer to remit in case such motion is overruled, our judgment reversing the judgment obtained by the bank against the surety company is set aside, and judgment entered reforming the trial court’s judgment against the surety company by reducing the same from $7,036.30 to $5,736.30, and, as thus reformed, such judgment will be affirmed.-