Court Opinion

ID: 39513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:27:24+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:23.178723
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
                 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                September 29, 2005

                     _______________________             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                           No. 02-21154
                     _______________________

                    DOUGLAS SPECTOR, ET AL.,

                                           Plaintiffs-Appellants,

                             versus

    NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD., doing business as Norwegian
                          Cruise Line,

                                                Defendant-Appellee.

****************************************************************

                     _______________________

                           No. 03-20056
                     _______________________

                    DOUGLAS SPECTOR, ET AL.,

                                               Defendants-Appellees,

                             versus

    NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD., doing business as Norwegian
                          Cruise Line,

                                               Plaintiff-Appellant.

   ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, JONES, AND CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          On remand from the Supreme Court, this court requested

letters from counsel advising whether this court should decide the

remaining issues or should remand to the district court for further

proceedings.   Responding to the request, counsel for Norwegian

Cruise Line raised for the first time fact-based mootness and

standing issues that are contested by counsel for Douglas Spector,

et al.   To properly address these jurisdictional issues and, if

appropriate, the remaining issues in the case, we must remand.   In

doing so, we note only that the district court’s original basis for

denying relief — the Government’s failure to promulgate uniform

physical accessibility guidelines for cruise ships — has not been

eliminated by the Supreme Court’s decision as at least a factor in

the liability determination.

          REMANDED.

                                2