Court Opinion

ID: 1013911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:08:32.063315+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:25.910236
License: Public Domain

*840
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  Dr. Jamshid Farshidi appeals from the district court’s order granting summary-judgment to Defendant on his Title VII, due process, and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dr. Farshidi’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Farshidi v. Norfolk State Univ.,
  
  No. CA-03-56-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2003
  
   &
  
  entered July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED