Court Opinion

ID: 8478785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 16:11:30.950638+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:29.194372
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cliff Bernard Randall appeals the district court’s order granting Randall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randall, No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-9 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 7, 2009, entered Oct. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.