Court Opinion

ID: 9536543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 07:01:58.917343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:40.882809
License: Public Domain

Olson, J.
(concurring in the result)—The decision of this case turns upon the point that our inquiry is limited to the question of whether or not the findings of fact entered by the trial court support the judgment. Those findings are the facts of the case. Both of appellants’ contentions, that respondent was negligent per se and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur should be applied, are urged to impeach *82the fact found by the trial court—that respondent was not negligent. It seems to me that our consideration of both contentions is foreclosed, and unnecessary to the decision.
SchwelLenbach, C. J., concurs with Olson, J.