Court Opinion

ID: 9887184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 17:14:02.32368+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:34.038204
License: Public Domain

Beier, J., dissenting:
I respectfully dissent for the reasons set out in my concurrence in State v. Sandoval , 308 Kan. ----, 366 P.3d 665 (No. 113,299, this day decided) (Beier, J., concurring), slip op. at 8-10. The "[e]xcept as otherwise provided" introductory language in K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 22-2716(b)(3)(B) means something, and it requires lifetime postrelease supervision in this case.
Nuss, C.J., and Biles, J., join the foregoing dissenting opinion.