Court Opinion

ID: 9587694
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:25:21.567645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:05.577983
License: Public Domain

Deen, Presiding Judge,
concurring specially.
I can concur fully with this case except for the citation of McKenzey v. State, 138 Ga. App. 88, 89-90 (1) (b) (225 SE2d 512) (1976). In the latter case Judge Quillian relegated it to the status of a physical precedent only by voting, “concurs in the judgment only, but not with all of the statements made therein.”
Not knowing precisely with which statements he disagrees in the cited case, I am not sure we could or should rely upon it in the case sub judice, as the cloud or shadow of McKenzey may fall upon our instant case, rendering it suspect.
*73Hugh J. McCullough, for appellant.
Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, David C. Walker, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.