Court Opinion

ID: 4080364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-06 16:56:17.067944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:23.182582
License: Public Domain

People v Baez (2016 NY Slip Op 06545)

People v Baez

2016 NY Slip Op 06545

Decided on October 6, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 6, 2016

Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman, Kapnick, JJ.

2462N/13 1832 3616/12 1831

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
v Candido Baez, Defendant-Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Tomoeh Murakami Tse of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yan Slavinskiy of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered February 20, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 6, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.