Court Opinion

ID: 997475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:57:21.040916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:49.267222
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-7084

STEPHEN DURAND HARRIS,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL EASLEY,

                                                Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-927-5-BO)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   January 7, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Durand Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998) and the order denying his motion for reconsideration.     We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Harris v. Easley, No. CA-97-927-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. June 1 & July 8, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2