Court Opinion

ID: 9703947
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 00:13:59.257246+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:53.291005
License: Public Domain

ERICKSTAD,
Chief Justice (concurring specially).
The writer of this opinion, through his analysis of the statutes and the case law, has convinced me that we committed error in Brink v. Curless, 209 N.W.2d 758 (N.D. 1973), by applying superseded law. If we have today failed to fully comprehend the legal basis for the holding in Brink, have misconstrued the law, or have failed to take cognizance of the appropriate law, it is within the province of the appellee to so advise us in a petition for rehearing.
PAULSON, J., concurs.