Court Opinion

ID: 5815140
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 19:37:30.718623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:58.619434
License: Public Domain

Defendants waived any right to arbitration by failing to raise it as a defense in their answer, making a dispositive motion, seeking discovery and otherwise actively participating in this litigation for almost nine months before notifying plaintiff of their intention to seek arbitration (see Flores v Lower E. Side Serv. Ctr., Inc., 4 NY3d 363, 371-372 [2005]). We reject defendants’ contention that any waiver of the right to arbitrate by the defendants in the original complaint may not bind the additional defendants named in the amended complaint. The newly named estates and trust, by their executors and trustee, are represented by the same persons named as defendants in the original complaint. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.