Court Opinion

ID: 7586363
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:37:26.174428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:35.444560
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Raul Vergara, plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. After review of the briefs and record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is therefore affirmed.