Court Opinion

ID: 1017977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:13:13.256675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:44.392057
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-7599

SCOTLAND EUGENE WILLIAMS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

KAREN GARDNER; TERESA WILLIAMS,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.      Andre M. Davis, District Judge.
(CA-04-953-AMD)

Submitted: December 15, 2005              Decided:   December 22, 2005

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.           We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we

affirm   for   the   reasons   stated   by   the   district   court.   See

Williams v. Gardner, No. CA-04-953-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 20, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -