Court Opinion

ID: 9780999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 15:10:03.654926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:34:17.089945
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed August 30, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-1073
                      Lower Tribunal No. F86-15686
                          ________________

                       Derek Newton Thomas,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                         The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

     Derek Newton Thomas, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
     Affirmed. Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So. 2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA

2000) (“When a negotiated plea agreement is not conditioned upon the

imposition of a sentence within a specific guideline range, improper scoring

of the defendant's scoresheet will not render the plea illegal unless the

sentence exceeds the statutory maximum”) (citing Skidmore v. State, 688

So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Russell v. State, 656 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 5th

DCA 1995) (scoresheet error harmless when based on plea bargain); Gentile

v. State, 673 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (if negotiated plea is not

conditioned upon a specific guideline range, any error will be harmless); and

Boerstler v. State, 622 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)(sentence imposed in

accordance with valid plea agreement will not be rendered illegal due to

scoresheet error)). See also Coppola v. State, 938 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2006);

Atiyeh v. State, 103 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Brown v. State, 781 So.

2d 484, 485-86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (affirming trial court order denying rule

3.800(a) motion, and noting that defendant’s claim that the sentence

imposed exceeded the recommended sentence under the guidelines was

without merit where his sentence “was not imposed pursuant to a

recommended guidelines sentence, but rather as part of a negotiated plea

agreement.”)

                                     2