Court Opinion

ID: 6627082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:35:06.951699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:58:51.542938
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Silk wearing apparel in part of galloons, embroidered, like that involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396) was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.