Court Opinion

ID: 4248079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-24 01:00:24.465621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:24.682418
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-11546      Document: 00514360630         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/23/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-11546
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 23, 2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LONNIE LEE ROTENBERRY, also known as “Throwed Off”,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:16-CR-121-8

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Lonnie Lee Rotenberry has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rotenberry has filed a response. We have reviewed the Anders
briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
Rotenberry’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-11546   Document: 00514360630    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/23/2018

                               No. 16-11546

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                    2