Court Opinion

ID: 3809163
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:48:31.440988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:09.093112
License: Public Domain

This appeal comes to us on a transcript of the record of the superior court of Oklahoma county. The nine assignments of error contained in the petition in error are: (1) Error in overruling motion for new trial; (2) error in admitting, over objection, hearsay testimony; (3) error in overruling motion for judgment; (4) error in admitting evidence on the part of defendants in error; (5) *Page 65 
error in excluding competent and legal evidence offered on the part of plaintiffs in error; (6) error in instructing the jury; (7) error in submitting special interrogatories to the jury; (8) that the verdict of the jury was not supported by and is contrary to the evidence; (9) that the verdict of the jury is contrary to law.
It will be seen that all of the errors assigned occurred at and during the trial. It has repeatedly been held by this court that errors alleged to have occurred on the trial of a cause cannot be presented to this court, in the absence of a bill of exceptions or case-made. The rule is thus stated in Menten v.Shuttee et al., 11 Okla. 381, 67 P. 478:
"Motions presented in the trial court, the rulings thereon, and exceptions are not properly part of the record and can only be preserved and presented for review on appeal by incorporating the same into a bill of exceptions or case-made. The record proper in a civil action consists of the petition, answer, reply, demurrers, process, rulings, orders, and judgment; and incorporating motions, affidavits or other papers into a transcript will not constitute them a part of the record, unless made so by a bill of exceptions. Motions and proceedings which are not part of the record proper can only be presented for review by incorporating them into a case-made, or by preserving them by bill of exceptions and embracing them in the transcript."
Many subsequent opinions of this court have followed and approved the rule above announced. Among the cases are the following: Davis v. Lammers, 23 Okla. 338, 100 P. 514; Greenv. Town of Yeager, 23 Okla. 128, 99 P. 906; TribalDevelopment Co. v. White Bros., 28 Okla. 525, 114 P. 736;Simpson v. Henderson-Sturges Piano Co., 31 Okla. 623,122 P. 174; Richardson et al. v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463,126 P. 818; Williamson et al. v. Adams, 34 Okla. 317,125 P. 486; University Realty Co. v. English, 41 Okla. 593,139 P. 516. *Page 66 
The errors assigned, not arising upon the record proper, and not having been preserved and presented for review on appeal by incorporating them into a bill of exceptions or case-made, cannot, therefore, be considered.
The motion of defendants in error to dismiss the appeal is therefore sustained.
All the Justices concur.