Court Opinion

ID: 4443968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-03 16:08:05.239145+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:50.780986
License: Public Domain

People v Vitinio-Tapia (2019 NY Slip Op 07137)

People v Vitinio-Tapia

2019 NY Slip Op 07137

Decided on October 3, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2019

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Singh, JJ.

10000 5032/15

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vMiguel Vitinio-Tapia, Defendant-Appellant.

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered April 10, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 3, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.