Court Opinion

ID: 64397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 05:13:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:29.626451
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  This appeal reaches us after the district court refused to grant qualified immunity to the defendants-appellants for their alleged actions taken in violation of the plaintiff-appellee’s constitutional rights. Construing the facts under the appropriate pre-trial standards, the district court found that the law was clearly established that Martinez was entitled to procedural protections under Texas law for either his superintendent contract or, if that contract was void, his administrator contract; in
   
   *183
   
  light of this, it was objectively unreasonable for the defendants-appellants to deny him such process.
 

  We agree with the district court and we AFFIRM its judgment.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.