Court Opinion

ID: 9727834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 13:50:59.807332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:43.414958
License: Public Domain

*910FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J .
I concur in the result. Defendant’s brief on appeal indulges in a cursory and diffuse void-for-vagueness attack on Penal Code section 632. The attack is not supported by verbal analysis, pointed argument or research among constitutional precedents. The statute is presumptively constitutional. (In re Ricky H., 2 Cal.3d 513, 519 [86 Cal.Rptr. 76, 468 P.2d 204].) Defendant has failed to overcome the presumption of constitutionality.
A petition for a rehearing was denied March 17, 1978, and the opinion was modified to read as printed above. Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 19, 1978.