Court Opinion

ID: 7050987
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 07:00:06.770264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:11:44.335641
License: Public Domain

McBride, J.
This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver for mortgaged chattels.
The suit was brought by the assignee of the mortgage, and of the notes secured thereby, against the mortgagor to collect the sum due on the notes and to foreclose the mortgage. There is no other defendant, and the notes are overdue. The appellant urges that as the complaint does not show that the mortgage was recorded within ten days it is void, *317and that, as a consequence, the assignee acquired no interest or right in the mortgaged property entitling him to a receiver.
Filed May 21, 1891.
So far as the parties to a chattel mortgage are concerned, recording is not necessary to its validity. The statute provides only, that if not recorded it shall not be valid as against any other person than the parties thereto. The mortgagor can take no advantage of a failure to record it. Section 4913, R. S. 1881; McTaggart v. Rose, 14 Ind. 230.
The appellant also insists that sufficient reasons are not shown in the petition to authorize the appointment of a receiver. The petition shows the insolvency of the debtor; that the mortgaged property is not sufficient in value to secure the debt, aud that there is danger of its removal beyond the jurisdiction of the court. This is sufficient.
The court did not err in appointing the receiver.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.