Court Opinion

ID: 9826722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 16:28:21.59033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:47:16.530031
License: Public Domain

On Petition bob Reheabing.
By petition for a rehearing appellant Williams complains of our holding that the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Allred bill left nothing to support the decree of *551sale under which he claims; and he undertakes to support that sale by saying it was made in the consolidated tax cases — the Allred hill for taxes for the years 1930 to 1936 and six earlier bills for taxes for the years 1924' to 1929, inclusive. This,, however, does not aid the sale, which was made for Cravens’ delinquent taxes for the years 1933 to 1936. There was no other bill for these taxes but the Allred bill and its dismissal left nothing on which to base a sale for these taxes.
The petition to rehear is overuled at petitioner’s cost.
Howell and Hickerson, JJ., concur.