Court Opinion

ID: 9755358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 20:35:34.349055+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:53:49.441437
License: Public Domain

SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. Cowan has not alleged either that the SASH premises were defective or that any state employee used the suspenders or walker-one of which is a necessary prerequisite to a waiver of immunity under section 101.021(2). See Texas Dept. of Transp. v. Able, 35 S.W.3d 608, 612 (Tex.2000) (“in addition to liability based on principles of respondeat superior, subsection 2 includes governmental liability for premise defects”).