Court Opinion

ID: 4693268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-07 15:00:26.49996+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:21.621639
License: Public Domain

20-923-cr
United States v. Cheese

                                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                      FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

                                                  SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A
SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY
FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1.
WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST
CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION
"SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON
ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

              At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in
the City of New York, on the 7th day of June, two thousand twenty-one.

PRESENT:             ROBERT D. SACK,
                     DENNY CHIN,
                     RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
                                         Circuit Judges.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                    Appellant,

                              -v-                                                  20-923-cr

CONSTANTIN CHEESE, AKA CONS,
ANDRE BARNABY, AKA GOONIE DRE,
BRANDON DARBY, AKA BARRACK,
ANTONIO DAVIS, AKA BIG BLOOD, AVERY
MITCHELL, AKA SLAV, NAHJUAN PERRY,
AKA NAS, PIERRE RAYMOND, AKA LEEKY,
JAMES ROBERSON, AKA LITTLES, SHAWN
SILVERA, AKA DUM OUT, SHAMEL
SIMPKINS, AKA SHA BANG, KIMBERLY
THOMPSON, AKA KIMMY,
                                        Defendants-Appellees. *

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

FOR APPELLANT:                                               JONATHAN E. ALGOR, Assistant United
                                                             States Attorney (David C. James, Assistant
                                                             United States Attorney, on the brief), for Mark J.
                                                             Lesko, United States Attorney for the Eastern
                                                             District of New York, Brooklyn, New York.

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE                                       NICOLAS BOURTIN (Amanda Shami, on the
CONSTANTIN CHEESE:                                           brief), Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York
                                                             New York.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

New York (Garaufis, J.).

                    UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND

DECREED that the order of the district court is VACATED and the matter is

REMANDED for further proceedings.

                    The government appeals from an order of the district court, entered

February 12, 2020, dismissing four counts of a superseding indictment charging the use

of firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). On

appeal, the government argues that the district court erred in dismissing the four counts

because attempted Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a predicate "crime of violence" under

*         The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the caption as set forth above.
                                                                 2
18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the

procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

              On July 11, 2019, a grand jury returned a superseding indictment against

seventeen defendants, including defendant-appellee Constantin Cheese. The

superseding indictment charged the defendants -- members and associates of the

Queens-based Makk Balla Brims set of the Bloods gang -- with, inter alia, attempted

Hobbs Act robberies and violations of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), which prohibits using a

firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence.

              On August 7, 2019, Cheese filed a motion to dismiss Count Twelve of the

superseding indictment, which charged him with using a firearm in furtherance of a

crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) -- specifically, in furtherance of an

attempted Hobbs Act robbery of a home in Port Washington, New York on October 16,

2017. Cheese argued that because attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a "crime of

violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the government had failed to charge him with the

requisite predicate. Subsequently, defendants-appellees Andre Barnaby, Nahjuan

Perry, Brandon Darby, and Pierre Raymond filed letters joining Cheese's motion as

applied to their respective 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) counts -- Counts Eight, Ten, and Fourteen

of the superseding indictment -- also predicated on attempted Hobbs Act robberies. On

February 12, 2020, the district court held that attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a

"crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and dismissed Counts Eight, Ten, Twelve,

                                              3
and Fourteen of the superseding indictment as to defendants-appellees Constantin

Cheese, Andre Barnaby, Brandon Darby, Antonio Davis, Avery Mitchell, Nahjuan

Perry, Pierre Raymond, James Roberson, Shawn Silvera, Shamel Simpkins, and

Kimberly Thompson. This appeal followed. 1

              Whether an offense is a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is a

question of law that this Court decides de novo. United States v. Scott, 990 F.3d 94, 104

(2d Cir. 2021) (en banc). Subsequent to the district court's order, this Court held in

United States v. McCoy that "an attempt to commit Hobbs Act robbery . . . categorically

qualifies as a crime of violence." 995 F.3d 32, 55 (2d Cir. 2021) (internal quotation marks

and alterations omitted). Accordingly, Counts Eight, Ten, Twelve, and Fourteen of the

superseding indictment were properly predicated, respectively, on Counts Seven, Nine,

Eleven, and Thirteen alleging attempted Hobbs Act robberies. We therefore conclude

that the district court erred in dismissing the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) counts as to the

defendants-appellees.

              For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the order of the district court and

REMAND the matter for further proceedings.

                                            FOR THE COURT:
                                            Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

1      The other ten defendants-appellees did not separately brief the appeal but joined in
Cheese's brief.
                                               4