Court Opinion

ID: 7103111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:17:51.754457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:28.580053
License: Public Domain

Reed, J.
It is alleged in the petition that the defendant’s servant was guilty of certain negligent acts which caused the death of the animal. The answer is as follows: “ That of the alleged negligence of said Smith, [the servant,] and the death of said cow, the defendant has no knowledge or information' to form a belief that said cow died in consequence of such negligence, and therefore denies the same.”
The question presented is whether an issue is formed as to the negligence of the servant by this answer. The circuit court ruled that the burden was on plaintiff to prove the acts of negligence alleged in the petition. Under our statute, (Code, § 2655,) the defendant may put in issue the allegations of the petition, either by a special or a general denial, or a denial of knowledge or information thereof sufficient to form a belief. The answer in question does not, either specifically or generally, deny the allegations of the petition. In express terms, it denies that defendant has any knowledge or information to form a belief “ that said cow died in consequence of such negligence.” As to that averment, it is sufficient to put upon plaintiff the burden of proving it; but it clearly does not put in issue the allegation that Smith was guilty of the negligence charged, and that allegation is to be deemed true.
The judgment of the circuit court will be
Reversed.