Court Opinion

ID: 5803199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:31:54.080873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:38.905455
License: Public Domain

In a partition action, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated July 17, 1975, as (1) awarded defendant one-half of the net rental value of the property and (2) awarded the referee a fee of $7,500. Interlocutory judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the referee’s fee to $5,000. As so modified, interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by plaintiff to respondent wife only. Defendant was wrongfully ousted by plaintiff from the marital home owned by them as tenants by the entirety. She was entitled to one-half of the rental value from that date to the date of sale pursuant to the partition decree, after due credit to plaintiff for the expenditures made by him in connection with maintenance, mortgage, taxes, insurance, etc. (Sirianni v Sirianni, 14 AD2d 432; Marios v Marios, 206 Misc 860; Cagan v Cagan, 56 Misc 2d 1045). The fee awarded to the referee was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Cohalan and Rabin, JJ., concur.