Court Opinion

ID: 2689953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:24:40.483393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:51:53.666277
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.]

          LAW ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAKE METROPARKS, APPELLEE.
    [Cite as Law v. Lake Metroparks, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322, 2007-Ohio-6749.]
Adverse possession — Real property owned by a park district — Court of
        appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park
        Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.
           (No. 2007-0298 — Submitted November 28, 2007 — Decided
                                 December 20, 2007.)
                APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County,
                          No. 2006-L-072, 2006-Ohio-7010.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St. 3d
148, 2007-Ohio-5586, 876 N.E.2d 1210.
        MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and
CUPP, JJ., concur.
        PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in
Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist.
        O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
                                 __________________
        Redmond, Walker & Murray and Gerald R. Walker, for appellants.
        Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee.
                              ______________________