Court Opinion

ID: 9960375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-16 00:00:41.514309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:19:24.820336
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10744            Document: 42-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/15/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                   ____________
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 23-10744
                                  Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                  ____________                                  April 15, 2024
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
Flavius N. Euristhe; Kimila S. Euristhe,                                            Clerk

                                                                Plaintiffs—Appellants,

                                          versus

William P. Beckmann; Scott Everette; John G. Aldridge,
Jr.; David A. Spector; Joshua A. Hahn; Bill Shaddock;
Mary L. Nicholson, in personal and public capacity as Tarrant County
Clerk,

                                            Defendants—Appellees.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:23-CV-653
                   ______________________________

Before Jolly, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
      Flavius N. Euristhe and Kimila S. Euristhe filed a pro se complaint
mostly alleging violations of various federal laws regarding a then-impending
foreclosure sale of their property. In the instant appeal, they challenge the

      _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10744       Document: 42-1         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/15/2024

                                 No. 23-10744

denial of their motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a
preliminary injunction to stop the foreclosure sale. The denial of a TRO is
not an appealable decision, In re Lieb, 915 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1990), and
because the property at issue has been sold, the district court’s denial of a
preliminary injunction is now moot, see Dick v. Colo. Hous. Enters., L.L.C.,
872 F.3d 709, 711-13 (5th Cir. 2017).
       Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. To
the extent that the Euristhes’ brief includes various motions, they are
DENIED.

                                        2