Court Opinion

ID: 994562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:34.401566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:09.011851
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7429

JAMES FORBES,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

L. THOMPSON, Doctor; NURSE EPPERSON,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-96-818-2)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 24, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Forbes, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT,
ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Forbes
v. Thompson, No. CA-96-818-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2