Court Opinion

ID: 1003420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:26:13.997832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:17.214196
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTONIO ESPINAL, a/k/a Moreno,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-95-39, CA-99-1507-AM)

Submitted:   January 18, 2001             Decided:   January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Espinal, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Antonio Espinal seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Espinal, Nos. CR-95-39; CA-99-

1507-AM (E.D. Va. filed July 18; entered July 21, 2000).        We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2