Court Opinion

ID: 6946114
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:25:49.693225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:55.184077
License: Public Domain

Smith, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: This case presents the same point decided at the present term, in the case of Dormady v. The State Bank of Illinois. (1)  The question is one of demurrer to evidence. On looking into the record, no written demurrer or joinder is contained therein, but a recital is stated of a demurrer and joinder by the parties. The evidence is contained in a bill of exceptions to the opinion of the Court, on its judgment on the demurrer, sustaining the same, which also recites the demurring and joining in demurrer to the evidence. The whole evidence is a mass of circumstances and presumptions, of an exceedingly loose and indeterminate character, relating to the identity of certain animals alleged to be the property of the plaintiff, for which the present action of trover and conversion was prosecuted. No admissions are made of particular facts, nor of those the evidence conduces to prove. The case is not only loose and uncertain in the manner it is presented, the demurrer and joinder not appearing on paper,—a practice not to be tolerated in cases of demurrer to evidence,—but is so completely within the rule of decision laid down in the case of Dormady v. The State Bank of Illinois, that we cannot hesitate to reverse the judgment, and remand the case with instructions to the Circuit Court, to award a venire facias de novo. The plaintiff in error is to recover his costs. Judgment reversed.   Ante 236.