Court Opinion

ID: 3608624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:53:24.088893+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:59.781715
License: Public Domain

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal the following question was presented and necessarily passed upon: The appellants contended that the receipt in evidence of wire tapped telephone calls was illegal because of section 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (U.S. Code, tit. 47, § 605). This court held to the contrary. (See Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. Bell,296 N.Y. 15.) No opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ. *Page 730