Court Opinion

ID: 3075292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:08:16.999927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:05:11.447027
License: Public Domain

In The

                                  Court of Appeals
                      Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                              ____________________
                                 NO. 09-13-00341-CR
                                 NO. 09-13-00342-CR
                                 NO. 09-13-00343-CR
                              ____________________

                        FRANCISCO SALAZAR, Appellant

                                            V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                 ______________

                    On Appeal from the 9th District Court
                         Montgomery County, Texas
         Trial Cause Nos. 11-05-05000 CR-CT1, 11-05-05000 CR-CT2,
                           and 11-05-05000 CR-CT3
________________________________________________________                  _____________

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

       On August 29, 2013, Francisco Salazar filed a notice of appeal from sentences

imposed on July 21, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed with the trial court more than

thirty days from the date of sentencing and outside the time for requesting an extension of

time for filing the notice of appeal. We notified the parties that the notice of appeal did

not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant did not file a response.

                                             1
      The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.2. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.

It does not appear that the appellant obtained out-of-time appeals from the Court of

Criminal Appeals. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain these appeals.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

      APPEALS DISMISSED.

                                        ________________________________
                                                  HOLLIS HORTON
                                                       Justice

Opinion Delivered September 25, 2013
Do Not Publish
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

                                            2