Court Opinion

ID: 3168647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-11 22:06:23.141204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:52:28.880485
License: Public Domain

FINAL REPORT1

                             Amendment of Pa.R.Crim.P. 801

QUALIFICATIONS OF CAPITAL CASE COUNSEL; PROSECUTORIAL EXPERIENCE

       On January 11, 2016, effective April 1, 2016, upon the recommendation of the
Criminal Procedural Rules Committee, the Court adopted the amendment of Rule of
Criminal Procedure 801 (Qualifications for Defense Counsel in Capital Cases) to correct
the description of the prosecutors to whom the rule is applicable and to clarify that
experience as a prosecutor should be considered to satisfy the experiential
requirements of the rule.
       Rule 801 (Qualifications for Defense Counsel in Capital Cases) was adopted on
June 4, 2004.2 Rule 801 provides standards for experience and continuing legal
education required of criminal defense counsel representing defendants in proceedings
involving possible capital punishment, including pretrial, trial, post-conviction, and
appellate proceedings. Included in these standards is the requirement that, before an
attorney may represent a defendant in a capital case, either as retained or appointed
counsel, he or she must serve as lead or co-counsel in a minimum of 8 significant cases
which were tried to verdict before a jury.3 A “significant case” is defined in the rule as a
case involving a charge of murder, including manslaughter and vehicular homicide, or a
felony of the first or second degree.
       The Committee was asked whether experience acquired as a prosecutor could
be counted toward the requirements of Rule 801(1). Although this is not explicitly stated
in the rule, it seems logical that the experience acquired in significant cases either as a

1
  The Committee's Final Reports should not be confused with the official Committee
Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the
Committee's Comments or the contents of the Committee's explanatory Final Reports.
2
  Rule 801 was not developed originally by the Committee but rather was the product of
a special ad hoc group.
3
  Representation in appellate proceedings requires prior appellate or post-conviction
representation in a minimum of 8 significant cases.

Qualifications of Capital Case Counsel Final Report: 01/11/2016
prosecutor or as defense counsel be counted. Even though the function of a prosecutor
is obviously different, many of the trial and practice skills are complementary. Such an
interpretation would provide a reasonable inclusiveness in an already limited pool of
counsel. Furthermore, this is the common practice in most jurisdictions. Therefore, the
Comment to Rule 801 has been revised to indicate that such experience be considered
in determining whether counsel qualifies under the rule.
       The Committee also received a suggestion to broaden the language of the initial
paragraph of the rule regarding the filing of the notice of aggravating circumstances
from the term “district attorney” to “attorney for the Commonwealth.” There are times
when the Office of the Attorney General prosecutes a murder as a capital offense, either
arising out of their primary jurisdiction or after a case has been referred to them by a
district attorney. Therefore, the terminology in the rule has been changed to this effect.

Qualifications of Capital Case Counsel Final Report: 01/11/2016      -2-