Court Opinion

ID: 23480
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:10:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:44.936573
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-50845
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

MARIA ELENA JIMENEZ,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                    USDC No. EP-00-CR-516-1-DB
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                         February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Maria Elena Jimenez appeals her sentence following her

guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.   Jimenez argues that her sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a).   Jimenez acknowledges that her argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but she seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-50845
                              - 2 -

     Jimenez’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523
U.S. at 235.

     The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief.   In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required.   The motion is granted.

     AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.