Court Opinion

ID: 9767242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:13:46.919135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.152595
License: Public Domain

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge
(concurring) .
I concur in the affirmance of the conviction, but as to appellant’s ground of error No. 2, would further observe that- in Charles v. State, 424 S.W.2d 909, cert. denied, this court stated (p. 921)
“Also we point out that this court has not held that the provision of Art. 38.22 (b) V.A.C.C.P. (1965), which provided that the court enter an order stating his findings, was mandatory and we decline to so hold.”