Court Opinion

ID: 1005497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:35.930975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:37.230459
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-7375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILBERT LEE GOODEN, JR.,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-98-53, CA-01-53)

Submitted:   October 4, 2001                 Decided:   October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Lee Gooden, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Wilbert Lee Gooden, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Gooden, Nos. CR-98-53;

CA-01-53 (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2