Court Opinion

ID: 2925084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:14:26.684493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:04.484347
License: Public Domain

NUMBERS 13-08-00207-CR  

						13-08-00208-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

ADAM ANDERSON,	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court 
of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, Adam Anderson, attempts to appeal his conviction for possession of
methamphetamine and tampering with physical evidence.  The trial court has certified in
both cases that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal."
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
	On April 24, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant
has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to
whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
	On August 11, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel's response
does not establish that the certifications currently on file with this Court are incorrect or that
appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.  
	The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these appeals
are DISMISSED.  Any pending motions are denied as moot.
							PER CURIAM
Do not publish.  
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.