Court Opinion

ID: 3078687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:38:22.32521+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:50.944659
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00229-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ARLYNE JOHNSON,                                                                Appellant,

                                             v.

OC GOLF, LLC,                                       Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 24, 2014. On

October 2, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely

filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of

this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 30th
day of October, 2014.

                                             2