Court Opinion

ID: 7516261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:47:08.126228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:29.012692
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking Webb’s probation for violating condition (5) but remand with directions to strike the finding that he also violated condition (6) because that finding does not conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing. See Sampson v. State, 375 So.2d 325 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Brouillett v. State, 373 So.2d 449 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
DANAHY, A. C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.