Court Opinion

ID: 2172653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:40.357665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:07.910120
License: Public Domain

292 S.W.3d 583 (2009)
Vincent J. PAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91329.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
September 15, 2009.
Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Christopher Koster, John Winston Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KENNETH M. ROMINES, C.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Pam appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their *584 information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).