Court Opinion

ID: 5267467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 19:03:23.778011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:10.472664
License: Public Domain

Smith, J.:
This action was brought for a divorce. The defendant counterclaimed for divorce against the plaintiff. The action was tried, resulting in a judgment sustaining the defendant’s counterclaim. The plaintiff, thereupon, made a motion for a new trial on newly-discovered evidence. Upon that motion a reference was had to a referee to take evidence and report. The reference was made upon condition that the plaintiff give a bond in the sum of $1,000 to pay the costs- of the reference. Such bond was given. The referee reported against a new trial, and the report was sustained by the Special Term. The defendant then sued the bondsman upon the bond in the Municipal Court. This motion was made *787in the divorce action in the Supreme Court to stay the action in the Municipal Court.
One action cannot be stayed by a motion in another action. The motion should have been made in the Municipal Court to stay the proceedings; or, possibly, in another action for injunction against the prosecution of that action a temporary injunction could be granted. But a mere order for a stay of an action cannot be made in another pending action. (Indestructible Metal Products Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 App. Div. 199.)
The order should be reversed, without costs, and the motion for a stay denied.
Clarke, P. J., Page, Greenbaum and Finch, JJ., concur.
Order reversed and motion denied, without costs.