Court Opinion

ID: 2926376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:28:33.095328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:38.075439
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00483-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JOE CORONADO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

	Relator, Joe Coronado, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on
August 21, 2009, through which he complains that the trial court erred in failing to rule on,
and grant, his motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment reflecting the time credit to which relator
is allegedly entitled.  The Court requested a response from the real party in interest, the
State of Texas, acting by and through the Criminal District Attorney of Nueces County,
Texas.
	The real party in interest has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition
for writ of mandamus.  According to the motion, the matters in this original proceeding have
been resolved and the petition has been rendered moot. 
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the parties are entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition for writ of
mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT without reference to the merits thereof. 

								PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 28th day of August, 2009.
 

 
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).