Court Opinion

ID: 8446268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 22:30:52.762608+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:55.176468
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
German Garcia Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and 155-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Garcia Garcia has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Garcia Garcia has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.