Court Opinion

ID: 9860152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 23:12:35.077099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:28.935650
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE STEIGMANN, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part: For the reasons stated in my opinion specially concurring in part and dissenting in part in People v. Donnelly (1992), 226 Ill. App. 3d 771, 779 (Steigmann, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the order in this case that reverses the sentencing order and remands to the circuit court with directions to amend the sentencing order to reflect the appropriate credit for time served. The presentence report in the present case contained specific information as to the dates defendant was in custody for which he was entitled to be given credit against the sentence subsequently imposed. At his sentencing hearing, defendant failed to complain about any inaccuracies in the presentence report regarding those dates or about how much credit the court gave him for time served. Instead, he raises these issues for the first time on appeal, and we ought not permit him to do so. I dissent.