Court Opinion

ID: 9762167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 02:14:31.251419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:31.329653
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DOUGLAS, Judge.
On original submission the judgments were reversed and bail was granted to each appellant. Since the opinion was written, it has been made to appear that the appellant McDougal has been tried for the offense of murder and has received a sentence of twenty-five years. He is, therefore, not entitled to bail under Article 44.-04, Section (h), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., because he received more than fifteen years. Ex parte Nielssen, 446 S.W.2d 882 (Tex.Cr.App.). The question is moot.
It has also been shown that before the cause on appeal became final against the appellant Contella he had made bail and the matter was moot and the record so reflected before the motion for rehearing was considered. The mandate in the Con-tella cause should be and it is' ordered withdrawn.
The judgments of reversal are set aside and the judgments are now affirmed.1

. Nothing herein alters the holding in the original opinion.