Court Opinion

ID: 7211914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 21:25:04.234071+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:52.315524
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM ***
Karen S. Zelmer appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) affirming the decision to deny her application for widow’s disability benefits pursuant to Ti-*491tie II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 402. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s order and will uphold the Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error. Pagter v. Massanari, 250 F.3d 1255, 1258 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.
Zelmer contends the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by reducing her widow’s insurance benefits in light of her retirement benefits from the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), because the USPS is not part of the federal government. See 42 U.S.C. § 402(e)(7)(A). Contrary to Zelmer’s contention, the USPS is a part of the federal government. See Silver v. USPS, 951 F.2d 1033, 1035-36 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (stating that the USPS is a part of the executive branch and that USPS employees are part of the civil service). Accordingly, the Commissioner properly offset Zelmer’s widow’s insurance benefits. See Heckler v. Mathews, 465 U.S. 728, 748-50, 104 S.Ct. 1387, 79 L.Ed.2d 646 (1984).
Furthermore, the ALJ properly denied Zelmer’s request for a change of venue because Zelmer failed to produce evidence that her representative was unable to travel or that any other basis for good cause existed. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.936(b) (permitting the ALJ to change the place where a hearing is held upon a showing of good cause).
Zelmer’s remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.