Court Opinion

ID: 5242709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 17:30:12.942831+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:49.448804
License: Public Domain

Page, J.:
The complaint alleges a contract of guaranty, in writing, signed by the defendant and nine other persons. The action is brought against the defendant Graham alone. The second ground of the demurrer is that it appears from the face of the complaint that there is a defect of parties defendant, in that the plaintiff has not made the other nine persons defendants in the action. The contract is the joint obligation of the ten persons who signed it, and the rule is well settled that all the parties jointly hable on the same instrument must be joined in an action thereon. The exceptions to the rule are that if any of the persons are bankrupt, dead or without the jurisdiction of the court, they need not be joined. It appears upon the face of the complaint that the obligation was joint, and in order to show a right of action in this court as against one alone, it was necessary for the plaintiff to allege that the others were within one of the exceptions to the general rule, and there being no such allegation, it appears upon the face of the complaint that there is a defect of parties defendant. (Sullivan v. N. Y. & R. C. Co., 119 N. Y. 348, 356; Franklin v. Beegle, 102 App. Div. 412.) The usual presumption of life applies, and there is no presumption that the omitted defendants are either non-residents or insolvent. The defendant is entitled to have all persons shown to be jointly liable with him made parties defendant, unless it affirmatively appears that they cannot be joined. It is only where it is not disclosed by the complaint that there are omitted parties who are necessary to the determination of the cause that it is necessary to allege such facts in the answer.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the demurrer sustained, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days upon payment of said costs.
Clarke, P„ J., Laughlin, Sgott and Smith, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and demurrer sustained, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs.