Court Opinion

ID: 992432
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:51:53.999203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:29.952533
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-1472

DOROTHY P. LITZENBERG,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN H. LITZENBERG,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-97-610)

Submitted:   June 12, 1997                 Decided:   June 17, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

civil action alleging conspiracy in state court domestic relations

proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Litzenberg v. Litzenberg, No. CA-
97-610 (D. Md. Mar. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motions for oral

argument and to amend the record. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2