Court Opinion

ID: 2654239
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-02-24 16:56:58.679469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:38.425248
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20173      Document: 00512540389         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 13-20173
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUSTACIO CABRERA MALDONADO, also known as Eustacio Maldonado,
also known as Eustaciocabrera Maldonado,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:12-CR-726-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Eustacio Cabrera Maldonado has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Maldonado has not filed a response and has been removed from the
United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20173   Document: 00512540389    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2014

                               No. 13-20173

the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.      Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as
frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v.
Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

                                     2