Court Opinion

ID: 2945660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 03:53:54.938933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:32.253411
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,933

                   EX PARTE MICHAEL LYNN HENDERSON, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
               CAUSE NO. 2007-1731-C2A IN THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to sixty-five years’ imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Henderson v. State, No. 10-07-00394-CR (Tex. App. – Waco, August 26, 2009).

        Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of

his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. We remanded this application to the trial court

for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
                                                                                                      2

       Appellate counsel is no longer eligible to practice law in Texas, and the prison mail room has

filed an affidavit with the trial court, confirming that Applicant received no legal mail during the

time period when he could have filed a PDR. Based on that affidavit, and on appellate counsel’s

disciplinary record with the State Bar, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of

law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and

failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court

recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

       We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Tenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 10-07-00394-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 2007-1731-C2A from the 54th District Court of

McLennan County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within

30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: December 19, 2012
Do not publish