Court Opinion

ID: 7429290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:51:33.945602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:26.913854
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 5, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that *8there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.