Court Opinion

ID: 3079590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:44:38.598703+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:24:48.698786
License: Public Domain

In The

                                  Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                             ____________________
                                 NO. 09-12-00269-CR
                             ____________________

                      ANDREW EUGENE BRAZIL, Appellant

                                           V.

                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                ______________

                  On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                          Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. 11-11966
________________________________________________________                 _____________

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Andrew Eugene Brazil pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to burglary of a

habitation. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed him on unadjudicated

community supervision for seven years. After the State filed a motion to revoke, the trial

court found Brazil violated terms of the community supervision, adjudicated his guilt,

and sentenced him to twenty years of confinement.

      Brazil’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error. See

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State,

                                            1
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for

appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from the appellant. We have

reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to

order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813
S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

      AFFIRMED.

                                               ________________________________
                                                       DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                             Justice
Submitted on November 14, 2012
Opinion Delivered November 28, 2012
Do Not Publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

                                           2