Court Opinion

ID: 9779295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 21:44:09.914585+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:25.027164
License: Public Domain

OPINION
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROBERTS, Judge.
In the original opinion, appellant’s first ground was overruled because the record did not contain a bill of exception or other proof that appellant exhausted his peremptory challenges. A supplemental *597transcript has been filed with this Court, reflecting such a bill of exception. However, it was untimely filed and we decline to review it at this time. Article 40.09, § 6, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Nothing is presented for review.
The motion is denied.