Court Opinion

ID: 8624302
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:25:29.556069+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:36.134167
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Clayton E. Young seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying reconsideration of the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel and denying his motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Young seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.