Court Opinion

ID: 2955264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 00:35:38.655407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:08.832078
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00340-CR

Michael F. Haendel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CR-11-100017, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

		Michael F. Haendel attempts to appeal from a county court at law order dismissing
his appeal from a municipal court's judgment of conviction for the offense of interfering with,
assaulting, threatening or intimidating screening personnel at the Austin Bergstrom International
Airport.  A jury assessed a fine of $1.00.  The municipal court also assessed costs of $68.00.  The
county court at law, acting sua sponte, dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction after observing
that Haendel had paid the fine and costs assessed in the judgment.  See Mayes v. State, 214 S.W.2d
791, 791(Tex. Crim. App. 1948) ("Having fully paid the judgment by paying the fine and costs, the
action was terminated, precluding a review of the conviction.").
		The clerk's record includes the following notation:  "Customer Submitted Payment
01/24/2011 Defendant $69 paid by defendant."  Haendel does not contend otherwise.  The county
court at law properly dismissed Haendel's case for lack of jurisdiction, and we will do the same.  The
appeal from the municipal court judgment is moot because Haendel has voluntarily paid the fine and
costs assessed.  It has long been the rule in this state that the voluntary payment of the fine in a
misdemeanor case renders the appeal from the judgment in that case moot.  See, e.g., Winkler
v. State, 252 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952); Mayes, 214 S.W.2d at 791.  Because he
voluntarily elected to satisfy the judgment there is nothing from which to appeal.  Fouke v. State,
529 S.W.2d 772, 773 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975).  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want
of jurisdiction.
		Moreover, even if this appeal were not moot, this Court would still lack jurisdiction. 
This case was tried in a municipal court and appealed to the county court.  An appeal of such cases
to this Court may only be taken if the fine assessed exceeds $100.00, or if the only issue is the
constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
Ann. art 4.03 (West Supp. 2011).
		We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

						_____________________________________________
						J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed:   August 8, 2012
Do Not Publish