Court Opinion

ID: 9785944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 22:49:24.000802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:36:21.500218
License: Public Domain

*611DURHAM, Chief Justice,
concurring:
¶ 67 I concur in the lead opinion’s excellent treatment of the battery issue and write separately merely to note that the petitioners’ arguments regarding the continuing validity of Ledfors v. Emery County School District, 849 P.2d 1162 (Utah 1993), were stricken by this court because they were not addressed by the court of appeals and thus were not within the scope of our review on certiorari. Our opinion here therefore does not address that issue. Cf. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, 100 Hawaii 34, 58 P.3d 545 (2002).