Court Opinion

ID: 2949289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:01:25.305953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:31.486527
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                            NOS. WR-81,741-01 AND WR-81,741-02

                   EX PARTE ERIK CHRISTIAN PINKSTON, Applicant

             ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
       CAUSE NOS. 0815417D AND 0815422D IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT
                          FROM TARRANT COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to two charges

of robbery, and received concurrent sentences of fifteen years’ imprisonment.

       Applicant contends that he was approved for parole in absentia in 2010, and was released

to parole while in federal custody. Applicant alleges that after he discharged his federal sentence and

was released by federal authorities, he was improperly arrested and brought back to Tarrant County,

where his parole was revoked without notice or a hearing. TDCJ has provided an affidavit, stating
                                                                                                       2

that although Applicant was approved for parole in 2010, the approval was withdrawn on July 14,

2011, because Applicant refused to sign the parole certificate. According to the affidavit, Applicant

was never released on parole, and therefore his parole was never revoked.

        In support of his allegations, Applicant provides a copy of the parole certificate apparently

signed by him and witnessed on August 12, 2010. Applicant also provides an undated document

entitled “Release to Federal Detainer,” which appears to approve his release to the Federal Bureau

of Prisons. Applicant alleges that these documents show that he was in fact released to parole while

in federal custody, and that he should therefore have received notice and a hearing before his Texas

parole was revoked.

        In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334
S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

        The trial court may order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General

Counsel to file an additional affidavit addressing Applicant’s allegations in more detail, and

explaining Applicant’s history of incarceration and release.

        The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate

case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing.

TEX . C ODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact as to where Applicant has been serving his

sentences in these two cases. If Applicant has been serving these sentences in federal custody, the

trial court shall make findings as to whether there have been state detainers in effect during any time
                                                                                                     3

Applicant has been in federal custody, and if so the trial court shall make findings as to the specific

dates when any such detainers were in effect. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the

parole certificate provided by Applicant, which appears to have been signed by Applicant and

witnessed on August 15, 2010, and the “Release to Federal Detainer” are authentic documents. If

the trial court finds that those documents are what they purport to be, the trial court shall make

findings as to why TDCJ did not acknowledge Applicant’s release to parole. If the trial court finds

that Applicant was never released to parole, the trial court shall make findings as to why Applicant

was released from federal custody upon the expiration of his federal sentence without being returned

to Tarrant County. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to where Applicant is currently

confined, and as to how much time is remaining on his sentences. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

       These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 20, 2014
Do not publish