Court Opinion

ID: 558220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:10:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:48.186089
License: Public Domain

929 F.2d 692Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Raymond CREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;  Girard V. Thompson, Jr., M.D.;Balvir Kapil, M.D.;  Bonnie C. Scolpini, JailNurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7506.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 4, 1991.Decided March 21, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-90-374-R)
Raymond Crews, appellant pro se.
Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va.;    W. Carrington Thompson, Chatham, Va.;    Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va.;    Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Raymond Crews appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Crews v. Virginia, CA-90-374-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 1990).  We also note that Crews' claim that he was denied exercise is without merit.  Since Crews was allowed access to the dayroom, no constitutional violation occurred.    See Clay v. Miller, 626 F.2d 345 (4th Cir.1980).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED