Court Opinion

ID: 9365137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 21:00:34.790148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.378432
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7014      Doc: 6         Filed: 01/20/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-7014

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      v.

        DAVID WAYNE MCDANIEL,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
        Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00023-1)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 20, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        David Wayne McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7014      Doc: 6        Filed: 01/20/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              David Wayne McDaniel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

        production of documents in his previously closed criminal case. We have reviewed the

        record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Unites States v. McDaniel,

        No. 2:18-cr-00023-1 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 11, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2