Court Opinion

ID: 9593451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:22:32.776742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:42.923788
License: Public Domain

Sognier, Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur specially because church members in several affidavits contained in the record stated that there was ice present but that it was visible. These affidavits thus presented evidence in direct conflict with appellant’s statement that the ice was invisible and further raised a material question of fact whether the church could reasona*628bly be construed as having knowledge of the ice. Hence, summary judgment in favor of the church on the negligence issue was improper.
Decided June 8, 1988
Rehearing denied June 23, 1988
Charles E. Moore, Carolyn Mercer, for appellant.
Karen L. Jenkins, Arthur L. Myers, Jr., John M. Bovis, for appellees.