Court Opinion

ID: 2164725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:30:26.639195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:51:18.741239
License: Public Domain

86 Mich. App. 601 (1978)
272 N.W.2d 352
PEOPLE
v.
SCHUSTER
Docket No. 77-4872.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided October 18, 1978.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Stephen H. Naegele, Prosecuting Attorney (Prosecuting Attorneys Appellate Service, by Keith D. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General), for the people.
F. Martin Tieber, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for defendant on appeal.
Before: DANHOF, C.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and R.H. CAMPBELL,[*] JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Thomas Schuster, was originally charged in a two-count information with receiving or concealing stolen property, MCL 750.535; MSA 28.803, and unlawfully taking possession of and driving away a motor vehicle, MCL 750.413; MSA 28.645. As part of a plea bargain the prosecutor agreed to drop the latter charge if the defendant pled guilty and was in fact guilty of the receiving or concealing charge. The defendant's plea to receiving or concealing was accepted by the trial judge, and the defendant was sentenced to 3 years, 3 months to 5 years in prison. The defendant appeals by right. GCR 1963, 806.1.
The facts adduced at the plea proceeding tended to show that the defendant himself took the automobile without any permission from the owner and drove it away with the intent to sell it.
It is readily apparent that no factual basis was established to support the defendant's conviction of receiving or concealing. The statute which prohibits buying, receiving, or aiding in the concealment *603 of stolen goods does not encompass the thief himself. People v Kyllonen, 402 Mich. 135; 262 NW2d 2 (1978). Therefore, the defendant's conviction must be set aside.
The prosecutor is not barred from reinstating the charge of unlawfully taking possession and driving away a motor vehicle under People v McMiller, 389 Mich. 425; 208 NW2d 451 (1973). McMiller prohibits the state from charging the defendant with a higher offense after a guilty plea, arising out of the same transaction, has been accepted. In the present case the crimes of receiving or concealing stolen property and unlawfully taking possession and driving away a motor vehicle are both punishable by a five year maximum prison sentence. Therefore, the latter charge is not a higher offense, and the prosecutor may reinstate it if he feels that the ends of justice will be served thereby.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
NOTES
[*]  Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.