Court Opinion

ID: 4096209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-08 01:00:59.263334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:38.298678
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-40365      Document: 00513749136         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/07/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-40365
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        November 7, 2016
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL MONTIEL-RAMIREZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:15-CR-975-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Montiel-
Ramirez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Montiel-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Montiel-
Ramirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40365   Document: 00513749136    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/07/2016

                               No. 16-40365

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                    2