Court Opinion

ID: 831687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 20:50:15.358978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:06.598508
License: Public Domain

780 N.W.2d 254 (2010)
PEOPLE of The State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Tomas FELICIANO, a/k/a Nelson Feliciano and a/k/a Thomas Feliciano, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 139701. COA No. 290956.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
March 29, 2010.

Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 26, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for entry of an amended Judgment of Sentence. The 15-to-20-year sentences for burning of personal property with a value of $20,000 or more, receiving and concealing stolen property, and disinterment or mutilation of a human body violate the two-thirds rule of People v. Tanner, 387 Mich. 683, 690, 199 N.W.2d 202 (1972); MCL 769.34(2)(b). The minimum term for an indeterminate sentence may not exceed two-thirds of the maximum, even for a third habitual offender. People v. Wright, 432 Mich. 84, 86-86, 88-90, 437 N.W.2d 603 (1989); MCL 769.34(2)(b). When a court imposes an indeterminate sentence that violates this rule, and the maximum sentence is otherwise valid, it is the minimum sentence that must be adjusted because this is the portion of the sentence that is unlawful. People v. Thomas, 447 Mich. 390, 392-394, 523 N.W.2d 215 (1994). Because the statutory maximum, as elevated by the habitual offender statute, MCL 769.11(1)(b), for each of these three offenses is 20 years, the longest minimum sentence defendant could receive is 13 years 4 months. See MCL 750.74(1)(d)(i), MCL 750.535(2)(a), and MCL 750.160. The Judgment of Sentence is to be amended accordingly. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
Justice HATHAWAY recuses herself and will not participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).