Court Opinion

ID: 994991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:30:49.785712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:19.902456
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 97-6852

ISAAC GRAY,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND;
ARCHIE C. GEE, Warden,

                                             Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
97-332-CCB)

Submitted:    April 29, 1998                   Decided:   May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. Gray v. Attorney General, No. CA-97-332-CCB
(D. Md. May 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2