Court Opinion

ID: 2409992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:24:39.63762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:39.698371
License: Public Domain

116 U.S. 401 (1886)
EX PARTE BROWN & Another.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted January 13, 1886.
Decided January 18, 1886.
ORIGINAL.
*402 Mr. Leander Holmes and Mr. John H. Mitchell for the motion.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is denied. According to the petition, the court entertained jurisdiction of the cause, but dismissed it for want of due prosecution; that is to say, because errors had not been assigned in accordance with the rules of practice applicable to the form of the action. This is a judgment which can only be reviewed by writ of error or appeal, as the case may be. Mandamus lies to compel a court to take jurisdiction in a proper case, but not to control its discretion while acting within its jurisdiction. This rule is elementary. Ex parte Morgan, 114 U.S. 174, and cases cited.
Motion denied.