Court Opinion

ID: 8421559
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 21:47:04.064407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:24.700369
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
William M. Bryson, Jr., seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his request that the court direct the Internal Revenue Service to present evidence to support the forfeiture of various parcels of real estate. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000). Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bryson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED