Court Opinion

ID: 3551734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:04:10.941287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:23:36.444741
License: Public Domain

The plaintiff cannot recover. William Gale had no authority to surrender the Lee note and take a note payable to himself. There is a total failure of consideration. A judgment in this suit would not bind Lee's administrator, if one should be appointed, nor prevent his recovery upon the original note. When an administrator of Lee's estate is appointed, he may be made plaintiff instead of Willoughby. Hazen v. Quimby, 61 N.H. 76; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N.H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N.H. 467; Chauncy v. Ins. Co., 60 N.H. 428.
Case discharged.
ALLEN J., did not sit: the others concurred.
An administrator upon the estate of Lee was subsequently appointed, who came in, and was substituted for Willoughby as plaintiff, and, on a count for money had and received, judgment was rendered against the defendants for the amount due on the Lee note. *Page 663