Court Opinion

ID: 9683736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:36:08.619594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:50.020636
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
PRICE, Chief Justice.
We have carefully considered appellant’s motion , for rehearing herein, but adhere to .the original ruling in this case.
There is one ground of the motion we shall notice briefly. It is said that the •court erred in stating that Ralph Massad made a motion for an instructed verdict. What we did state was that the respective parties made motion for instructed verdicts. In the brief appellant’s third and fourth points of error complain of the court’s sustaining Ralph Massad’s motion for an instructed verdict. It is not deemed, however, important as to whether Ralph Mas-sad did or did not make a motion for an instructed verdict as the other parties did. Appellant unquestionably urge'd as error in his original brief the granting of a motion of Ralph Massad.