Court Opinion

ID: 8452050
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:52:39.732241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.548704
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ibrahima Sarr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sarr, No. 2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 30, 2013; *230entered Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.