Court Opinion

ID: 6260236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 22:01:00.993867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:41.418880
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
Appellant was tried by the court sitting without a jury on charges stemming from the. death of Leo McMahon. He was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and after denial of his post-trial motions and imposition of sentence, he has appealed, alleging only that the evidence was not sufficient to support the conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.
The evidence . showed that appellant and Sarah Kauffman, a registered nurse, spent the evening drinking with Leo McMahon, after which all three went back to McMahon’s apartment to sleep. The next day .the festivities continued until McMahon got into an argument with appellant, urging him to return to Norfolk, Virginia, where he was stationed in the Navy. Appellant refused to leave, although he was due back. Instead, he and Miss Kauffman went into one of the bedrooms in McMahon’s apartment and closed the door. McMahon began banging loudly on the door, after *165which, according to Miss Kauffman’s testimony, appellant said “I am going to settle this once and for all,” and stalked out of the room. She then testified that she heard the sound of yelling and things being thrown around in the kitchen, and upon opening the door saw appellant take a knife out of a drawer in the kitchen. Two minutes later appellant called to Miss Kauffman “Sally, come quick. Get help or a ambulance or somebody.” McMahon died soon afterward.
According to appellant, McMahon had been hitting him and beating him so he took the knife out to scare him, but the deceased continued to come after him and lunged on the knife. However, Dr. Fillinger, an assistant medical examiner in Philadelphia County, testified that the angle of the knife wound made it highly unlikely that McMahon died in the way appellant described. Rather, according to Dr. Fillinger, the wound was made by the thrust of the knife.
Appellant emphasizes the physician’s testimony that the appellant’s version was also a possible explanation for McMahon’s death. However, credibility was for the finder of fact, and Miss Kauffman’s testimony that appellant had picked up the knife even though there was no threat to his life, the testimony of the police that appellant had originally told them that McMahon stabbed himself, and appellant’s own testimony of the bad blood which existed between McMahon and him, gave the court adequate reason not to believe appellant’s explanation.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the decision of this case.