Court Opinion

ID: 614167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-09-26 14:43:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:55.176005
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

                        IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                               ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                           SEPTEMBER 26, 2011
                                     No. 10-13561
                                                               JOHN LEY
                               ________________________
                                                                CLERK

        D.C. Docket Nos. 5:09-cv-00045-LGW-JEG, 5:10-cv-00013-LGW-JEG

5:09-cv-00045

JAMES VICTOR PAULK,
TAMMY PAULK,

lllllllllllllllllllll                                      Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                                         versus

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
a corporation,

lllllllllllllllllllll                           Defendant - Appellee.
__________________________________________________________

5:10-cv-00013

TAMMY PAULK,
JAMES VICTOR PAULK,

lllllllllllllllllllll                                      Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                                         versus
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
a corporation,

lllllllllllllllllllll                                                Defendant - Appellee.

                              ________________________

                        Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Southern District of Georgia
                              ________________________

                                   (September 26, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

         The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of Pace v. CSX

Transp., Inc., 613 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir. 2010), which was issued after the plaintiffs

filed their notice of appeal. Any remedy for the plaintiffs must come from the

Surface Transportation Board.1

         1
        This case was removed from the oral argument calendar under the provisions of 11th Cir.
R. 34-3(f).

                                              2