Court Opinion

ID: 9384812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-05 06:07:04.776036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:56.751946
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed April 3, 2023

                                    S   In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00220-CV

      IN RE DALLAS PLASTIC SURGERY INSTITUTE, INC., Relator

          Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-15793

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                 Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove
                            Opinion by Justice Goldstein
      Before the Court is relator’s March 10, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus

wherein relator seeks relief from the trial court’s order denying its motion for partial

summary judgment.

      To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show (1) the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding).

      After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude that

relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Bonnie Lee Goldstein/
                                         BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN
                                         JUSTICE

230220F.P05

                                      –2–