Court Opinion

ID: 9831189
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:53:46.236691+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:32.299619
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing, appellants call our attention to the fact that we were in error in stating in our original opinion that in an oral deposition of appellee William Beck, taken in 1944, he had stated that Wm. F. Neese had told him to go ahead and fence and use said land. Appellants call our attention to the fact that Beck stated in said deposition that when Neese left the place he told him, Beck, that if he wanted to use the place to go ahead and fence it, and that he fenced it four years later and used it for pasturage.
This court is glad to make the above corrections.
The other findings of fact requested by appellants are in our opinion evidentiary in their nature, and are not confined to the ultimate issues in the case.
The above corrections in no way affect the final determination of this cause as embodied in our former opinion.
Motion for rehearing is refused