Court Opinion

ID: 9763221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 02:39:02.816282+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:56:30.566817
License: Public Domain

REEVES, Justice,
concurring.
I concur with the majority opinion and with the concurring opinion. I also find difficulties with the State’s explanations to the trial court under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). However, the appellant had the duty to point out to the court the facts the concurring opinion developed from the record; the trial court’s ruling cannot be “clearly erroneous” without the record reflecting that the court’s attention was directed to the facts contained in the record.