Court Opinion

ID: 540444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:29.653377
License: Public Domain

902 F.2d 27Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Karl BURNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James William HONG;  Beverly Carroll, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-1821.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 2, 1990.Decided April 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-1547-S)
Karl Burnett, appellant pro se.
Jeanne Marie Phelan, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Karl Burnett appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Title VII action.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Burnett v. Hong, C/A No. 89-1547-S (D.Md. Oct. 4, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED