Court Opinion

ID: 2962757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:01:36.604864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:09:24.365838
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          July 25, 1994                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1198                                  DR. PAUL R. YOCAS,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                            JUDITH A. COWIN, ETC., ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Selya and Cyr,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Dr. Paul R. Yocas on brief pro se.            _________________            Scott Harshbarger,  Attorney General,  and Elisabeth J.  Medvedow,            _________________                          ______________________        Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   We have  reviewed the  briefs of  the                      __________            parties and the record on appeal.  We agree with the district            court's  determination that  the complaint  was appropriately            dismissed on  the  grounds  of  judicial  immunity,  Eleventh            Amendment immunity,  lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and            abstention.                      Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.                      ________   ___