Court Opinion

ID: 4916331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-22 00:09:59.076675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:52.626605
License: Public Domain

Taylor, C. J.
The defendant in error, B. H. Davidson, obtained a peremptory writ of mandamus in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough county against the plaintiffs in error as county commissioners of said county commanding them to issue to him a permit, under the statute in such cases, to sell liquors, wines and beer in election district No. 28 of said county for and during the license year beginning on the 1st day of October, A. D. 1903, and ending on the 1st of October, A. D. 1904. From the judgment awarding the peremptory writ the said county commissioners have sued out writ of error from this court.
*76Upon reaching the case in its order on the docket the court finds that the time has expired during which the permit sought to be coerced by the writ would have been legally operative, and, consequently, that a decision at this time of the questions presented by the pleadings, either for or against either of the parties, would be entirely barren of any results. Under these circumstances, according to the well established rule here, as elsewhere, the cause must be dismissed, and it is, therefore, hereby ordered and adjudged that the said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiffs in error. State ex rel. Vann v. Martin, 47 Fla. 223, 36 South. Rep. 362; State ex rel. Rowe v. Martin, 44 Fla. 175, 32 South. Rep. 926; Broward v. Duval Athletic Club, 39 Fla. 751, 23 South. Rep. 489; State ex rel. Vereen v. Commissioners of Marion County, 27 Fla. 438, 8 South. Rep. 749.
Shackleford, Cockrell, Hocker and Whitfield, JJ., concur.
Carter, J., absent.