Court Opinion

ID: 9851853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:20:38.177625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:17.444294
License: Public Domain

Bussey, Justice
(concurring).
I am in accord with the conclusion that the driver of the Burnside vehicle was not operating such with the “consent, express or implied, of the named insured * * However, in accord with the views expressed in my concurring opinion in the recent case of Dearybury, etc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, I would remand the cause for consideration of the question of whether or not the driver of the Burnside vehicle was an insured of Hartford by virtue of being a guest in the vehicle. Here, as in Dearybury, substantial rights of minors are involved.