Court Opinion

ID: 4731921
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:56:27.578242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:08:05.400460
License: Public Domain

*534The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
The statute, Code Proc., §766, which requires a complaint in a divorce case to be under oath, means only that it shall be verified as are complaints in other cases, and a verification to the effect that the plaintiff believes the contents of the complaint to be true is sufficient.
The cause of action based on the ground of adultery was insufficiently stated, because the complaint did not show that the last act of adultery was committed within one year before the commencement of the action, or that it was unforgiven. Code Proc., §764, subd. 2. But proof was admitted without objection showing both facts, and we think the judgment should stand.
This was an appeal in the name of the defendant (who had made default, and who did not appear), taken by the prosecuting attorney. No appearance was made here by the respondent. Under these circumstances some question has arisen in our own minds as to whether, in such a case, the prosecutor has a right to appeal; and we desire to say that in passing upon the case, we leave the question of this right entirely open for future consideration.
Judgment affirmed.
Dunbae, C. J., and Scott and Anders, JJ., concur.
Hoyt, J., dissents.