Court Opinion

ID: 3608421
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:53:15.463001+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:00.955872
License: Public Domain

Was of opinion that the bill might be given in evidence under the money counts without the aid of the statutes on this subject, upon the authority of Henschel v. Mahler, 3 Denio, 428, 430 and of Hays v. Phelps, 1 Sandf. S.C. Rep. 67, and the authorities cited in these cases
GARDINER, JEWETT, WELLES and WATSON, concurred in the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed.
GRIDLEY, J., was absent.
Judgment affirmed. *Page 288