Court Opinion

ID: 2863929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:55:12.494288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:08:13.199897
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00670-CR

Glenn Eric Hamilton, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 48,336, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Glenn Eric Hamilton was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after he pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021
(West Supp. 2001).  The court later revoked supervision, adjudicated appellant guilty, and imposed
sentence of imprisonment for twenty-three years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________

				Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed:   June 29, 2001

Do Not Publish