Court Opinion

ID: 9913999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-29 14:02:27.37372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:09:49.381825
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                  STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                       Case No. 5D23-1789
                   LT Case No. 2021-CF-003260
                  _____________________________

JUANITA TAYLOR,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                  _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Anthony M. Tatti, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M.
Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                       December 29, 2023

SOUD, J.

    In this Anders * appeal, Appellant Juanita Taylor appeals her
judgment and sentence following her violation of probation. We

    * See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
affirm. However, we remand this matter to the trial court for
correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation.
See Carmona v. State, 363 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).

     More specifically, the order revoking probation identifies
Taylor violated three conditions: condition 2 (Failure to pay cost of
supervision), condition 3 (Changing residence without first
procuring the consent of the probation officer—absconding), and
condition 8 (Failure to work diligently at lawful occupation, advise
employer of probation status, support dependents). However, the
affidavit of violation of probation identifies, inter alia, violation of
special condition 8 by failing to complete 100 hours of community
service. Nowhere is it alleged Taylor violated standard condition
8.

    The totality of the record before us, including the transcript of
the hearing during which Taylor admitted her violation of
probation, makes clear it was special condition 8 she acknowledged
having violated. Accordingly, this case is AFFIRMED AND
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS to correct the scrivener’s error in
the order revoking probation to properly identify violation of
special condition 8 (Failure to complete 100 hours of community
service).

    It is so ordered.

BOATWRIGHT and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

                  _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

                                   2