Court Opinion

ID: 3793329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:39:20.311269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:00.465887
License: Public Domain

OPINION — AG — THE MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT PRESENTLY USED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN THE PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN COMMODITIES IS NOT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, INCONSISTENT WITH THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. THE CENTRAL PURCHASING DIVISION, STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, IS CHARGED WITH ADMINISTERING THE PROVISIONS OF THE PURCHASING LAWS AND POLICING THE PROCEDURE. THE ACQUIRING AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST AND BEST BIDDER. CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1971 85.5 [74-85.5], 74 Ohio St. 1971 85.7 [74-85.7], 74 Ohio St. 1971 35.5 [74-35.5] (JOSEPH J. REINKE) ** SEE: 857 P.2d 53 (1993), INDIANA NATIONAL BANK V. DH.S. **