Court Opinion

ID: 3897357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:29:21.603823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:49:49.860477
License: Public Domain

The Honorable Armando G. Barrera 79th Judicial District Attorney Post Office Drawer 3157 Alice, Texas 78333
Re: Authority of a county bail bond board to assess a fee to bail bond companies to recover the cost of employing a bail bond administrator (RQ-0786-GA)
Dear Mr. Barrera:
You ask whether a county bail bond board may impose a fee on bonding companies to pay for the cost of employing a bail bond administrator under section 1704.101 of the Occupations Code or any other statute.1
By way of background, we note that a bail bond board is statutorily mandated in a county of 110,000 persons or more and is permitted in other counties. TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. §§ 1704.051, .052 (Vernon 2004). The composition of a bail bond board is regulated by statute. See id.
§ 1704.053 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Under the terms of section 1704.101, Occupations Code, a bail bond board is required, inter alia, to:
    (1) exercise powers incidental or necessary to the administration of this chapter;
    (2) deposit fees collected under this chapter in the general fund of the county;
    (3) supervise and regulate each phase of the bonding business in the county;
    (4) adopt and post rules necessary to implement this chapter; [and]
    (8) employ persons necessary to assist in board functions[.]
Id § 1704.101(l)-(4), (8) (Vernon 2004). *Page 2 
A recent decision of the Texas Supreme Court considered the authority of a bail bond board to promulgate rules regarding the solicitation of customers. The court found that, because a board must `"exercise powers incidental or necessary to the administration of" chapter 1704, and `"supervise and regulate each phase of the bonding business,'" the power to regulate solicitation is within the board's power. Pruett v. HarrisCounty Bail Bond Bd, 249 S.W.3d 447, 452-55 (Tex. 2008) (quoting subsections 1704.101(1), (3)). Despite its authority to adopt rules, however, a board "may adopt only such rules as are authorized by and consistent with its statutory authority." Id. at 452. Such authority "may be either expressly conferred by statute or implied from other powers and duties given or imposed by statute." Id.
No provision of chapter 1704, or any other statute we have found, expressly authorizes a board to assess a fee to recover the costs of employing a bail bond administrator. Nor do we believe that such authority may be implied from a board's power to adopt rules or to "employ persons necessary to assist in board functions." TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 1704.101(8) (Vernon 2004).2 Moreover, a court will generally not imply authority to impose a fee, and as such, a public entity other than a home-rule city may not charge a fee unless that fee is specifically authorized by law. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0544 (2007) at 4 (a court strictly construes a statute imposing a fee and will not imply authority to impose a fee) (citing Moore v.Sheppard, 192 S.W.2d 559, 561 (Tex. 1946)); GA-0085 (2003) at 2 (commissioners court must have specific statutory authority to impose a fee), DM-22 (1991) at 1 (public entity other than home-rule city may charge fee only when specifically authorized by law, and not by implication); accord Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. JM-345 (1985) at 3, H-647 (1975) at 2, WW-1482 (1962) at 3.3
Based upon the preceding authority, we conclude that a county bail bond board may not impose a fee on bonding companies to pay for the costs of employing a bail bond administrator.4 *Page 3 
 SUMMARY
A county bail bond board may not impose a fee on bonding companies to pay for the cost of employing a bail bond administrator.
Very truly yours,
  GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas
  ANDREW WEBER First Assistant Attorney General
  JONATHAN K. FRELS Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
  NANCY S. FULLER Chair, Opinion Committee
  Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
1 Request Letter at 1 {available athttp://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov).
2 A county bail bond board has some express authority to impose fees. See, e.g., TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. §§ 1704.154(b)(4)(D) (Vernon 2004) (authorizing payment of a $500 filing fee to accompany an application for licensure as a bail bondsman); 1704.162(c) (authorizing payment of a $500 filing fee for license renewal).
3 It is also instructive that this office previously determined that the Webb County Bail Bond Board was not statutorily authorized to charge a $15 fee on each executed bail bond to pay the salary of a clerk to manage and keep bond records. See Tex. Att'y Gen. LO-90-25, at 2.
4 Similarly, a provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure declares that "[a]n officer may not impose a cost for a service not performed orfor a service for which a cost is not expressly provided by law"
TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.002 (Vernon 2006) (emphasis added). This statute has been cited by the Texas Supreme Court to prohibit a county from collecting, in the absence of specific statutory authority, a pre-conviction bail bond approval fee. See Camacho v.Sarnaniego, 831 S.W.2d 804, 811-12 (Tex. 1992). *Page 1