Court Opinion

ID: 7564299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:03:06.551368+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:14.739213
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends, by this appeal from a ruling denying his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief, that the court erred in sentencing him to three consecutive three-year mandatory minimum sentences for use of a firearm, where all three offenses arose out of a single criminal episode. We agree, and the State concedes, that the stacked mandatory minimum sentences violate the dictates of Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), which has retroactive application, Cisnero v. State, 458 So.2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
The cause is remanded for a correction of sentence so that the minimum mandatory sentences run concurrently.