Court Opinion

ID: 8478136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:52:07.300165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.424995
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 28, 2009, 2009 WL 3151309, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after *150resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.