Court Opinion

ID: 3253595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:23:53.189627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:21.588964
License: Public Domain

This suit originated in the justice of the peace court, and from a judgment for plaintiff in said court, the defendant (appellee here) appealed to the circuit court.
The cause in the circuit court was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was again rendered for plaintiff. The court thereafter, upon motion of appellee, set aside said judgment, and granted appellee a new trial, and from this action of the court this appeal is taken.
The complaint contained two counts, the second count being as follows:
"Plaintiff claims of defendant the other and further sum of $50 as damages, and avers that on, to wit, the 4th day of December, 1917, he was the owner of the northwest quarter of southeast quarter, section 21, township 16, range 3 east, upon which land a crop of corn was grown during the year by one T.F. George, and upon said crop plaintiff had a lien for rent, and that on, to wit, the 5th day of December, 1917, the defendant took possession of said corn grown upon said rented land, and has removed and disposed of same; has prevented plaintiff from enforcing his lien for the collection of his rent to plaintiff's damages in the sum of $50."
We have examined the testimony carefully, and are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to prove the averments of this count 2 of the complaint, and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover under that count. Waite, La Fils  Co. v. Corbin, 109 Ala. 154, 19 So. 505. The court properly rendered judgment for plaintiff.
We have not been furnished with a brief for appellee, and we do not know upon what theory the court set aside the judgment.
The judgment of the circuit court setting aside the judgment of the court and granting defendant a new trial is reversed, and a judgment is here rendered, overruling defendant's motion for a new trial.
Reversed and rendered.