Court Opinion

ID: 9892793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-24 21:00:45.68493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:30.637103
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1516      Doc: 6        Filed: 10/23/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1516

        RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE, Southern District of New
        York (SDNY),

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-03160-RDB)

        Submitted: October 19, 2023                                   Decided: October 23, 2023

        Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1516      Doc: 6         Filed: 10/23/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil

        action as an attempt to evade a vexatious litigant order entered against him in the Southern

        District of New York and declining to transfer Emrit’s case to the New York district court.

        Emrit previously appealed this order, and we affirmed. Emrit v. Special Agent, No. 23-

        1030, 2023 WL 3073624 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2023). Because we affirmed Emrit’s prior

        appeal, we dismiss his second appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                       DISMISSED

                                                     2