Court Opinion

ID: 989531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:08:05.206454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:42.747933
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DANIEL RAY WATSON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-87-15, CA-95-1061)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                   Decided:   June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Ray Watson, Appellant Pro Se.     Mary Stanley Feinberg,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for transcripts of contempt hearings. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommenda-

tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Watson, Nos. CR-87-15; CA-95-1061 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 29,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2