Court Opinion

ID: 2903492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 20:29:16.430985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:46.153154
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

KRYSTAL PEREZ,

                            Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                            Appellee.
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 § 

No. 08-09-00124-CR

Appeal from the

379th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC#2007CR11408W)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

	This is an appeal from a judgment adjudicating guilt for the offense of possession of heroin
in an amount less than one gram.  The court sentenced Appellant to eighteen months in a state jail
facility.  We affirm.
	Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094,
18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the
appeal.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684

(Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v.
State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to
Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro
se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeal.  The judgment is affirmed.

						GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

September 23, 2009

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)