Court Opinion

ID: 2965590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:42:22.793655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:23.886632
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No. 98-1546

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

               ALTON N. GRAY, JR., a/k/a DAN GRAY,

                      Defendant, Appellant.

           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

            [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior District Judge]

                              Before

                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
               Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
                                
                                

     Alton N. Gray, Jr. on brief pro se.
     Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney and Jean B. Weld,
Assistant U.S. Attorney on Motion for Summary Disposition.

December 1, 1998

                                
                                

            Per Curiam.  We have reviewed carefully the record in
    this case, including the briefs of the parties.  We affirm.
              Since the record indicates that Gray received notice
    of the government's impending seizure of the property at 412
    Granite Street both in his indictment and in his plea
    agreement, his claim that he was not given adequate notice is
    without merit.  Moreover, there is nothing in the record to
    indicate that, with the exception of a "hot tub and spa" and a
    "solar dome for the spa," any of the items sought by Gray were
    ever seized by the government.  While the record indicates that
    the spa and its dome were seized, as appurtenances to the
    property they were properly returned to the bank which held the
    mortgage on 421 Granite Street.  In any event, any claim Gray
    might have had to these items was abandoned in his plea
    agreement.
              Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.