Court Opinion

ID: 9568169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:01:07.224967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:24:25.283545
License: Public Domain

SMITH, Presiding Judge,
dissenting.
I join fully in Division 1 of Presiding Judge Andrews’s dissent, but I cannot join that portion of Division 2 which addresses the merits of the statute of repose. That issue is mooted by Division 1 of the dissent. In other words, if Division 1 of the dissent were this court’s majority opinion, the statute of repose issue should not be reached at all. Therefore, I join Division 2 of Judge Andrews’s dissent only to the extent that it finds the statute of repose issue moot.
*891Martin Snow, Robert R. Gunn II, Richard A. Epps, Jr., for appellants (case no. A07A0838).
Maniklal & Dennis, PreyeshK. Maniklal, Charles M. Cork III, for appellees.