Court Opinion

ID: 9396908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-23 21:00:59.335863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:19.741885
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1977      Doc: 25         Filed: 05/22/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-1977

        CRISTINA GILLASPIE,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00453-DCN)

        Submitted: May 18, 2023                                           Decided: May 22, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Allan R. Holmes, Timothy O. Lewis, Rebecca J. Wolfe, GIBBS & HOLMES,
        Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Adair F. Boroughs, United States Attorney,
        William H. Jordan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
        ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1977      Doc: 25         Filed: 05/22/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Cristina Gillaspie appeals the district court’s orders (1) accepting the magistrate

        judge’s recommendation to grant the Secretary of the Navy summary judgment on

        Gillaspie’s discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII

        of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; the

        Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, as applied through § 501

        of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l; and the Age

        Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634; and (2) denying Gillaspie’s

        Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Gillaspie v. Del Toro, No. 2:19-cv-

        00453-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2022; Aug. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2