Court Opinion

ID: 9459257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:15:35.785642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:05.879580
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
David Wayne Glover was convicted following a plea of guilty of conspiracy to counterfeit obligations of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1969). His case was referred to the probation officer for a presentence report and the ensuing sentence of the court was for three years.
Glover’s attorney does not seek a copy of the presentence report; rather, he speculates that the sentence must have been imposed on the basis of inaccuracies in the report.
Our examination of the presentence report, Baker v. United States, 388 F.2d 931, 933 (4 Cir. 1968), and the transcript does not disclose the presence of false or misleading information that would constitute a violation of due process in the several respects suggested by counsel. See Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690 (1948).
Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and grant the government’s motion for summary affirmance.
Affirmed.