Court Opinion

ID: 8606411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 03:35:28.81843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:16.480636
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ika Wah Lam appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised *641release and imposing a 3-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to securities fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78ff, and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lam has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.