Court Opinion

ID: 2921473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:22:35.862564+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:07.011946
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-04-00374-CV
 
COURT OF APPEALS
 
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________________   

IN RE ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION
 
_____________________________________________________________       
 
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus  
______________________________________________________________      

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez & Wittig

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

         Relator, Rolls Royce Corporation, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the
above cause on July 21, 2004.  On August 4, 2004, the real parties in interest, Myra
Vasquez, et al., filed a response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, and relator
thereafter filed a reply to the response of the real parties in interest.
         The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus, the response, and reply, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself
entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 
                                                                        PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 24th day of August, 2004.