Court Opinion

ID: 4457986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-21 20:00:19.894505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:33.007271
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-2053

THEODORE BRYANT,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01183-ELH)

Submitted: November 19, 2019                                Decided: November 21, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Theodore Bryant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment

discrimination complaint in part and granting summary judgment to Appellee on the

remainder of the action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bryant’s informal brief does not

challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Bryant has forfeited appellate review

of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited

to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                              2