Court Opinion

ID: 2923711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:51:39.049742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:27.334106
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-393-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

NOE VAIZ GARZA,	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee.
________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court
 of Hidalgo County, Texas.
________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, NOE VAIZ GARZA, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment
entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.  Sentence in this cause was
imposed on January 12, 2007.  An untimely motion for new trial was filed on February 16,
2007.   The notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 12, 2007, but was not filed
until February 16, 2007.   Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.  
	Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of
time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within  fifteen days of the last day
allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably
explaining the need for such extension.  Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a
motion requesting an extension of time within such period. 
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely
perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
								PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 11th day of October, 2007.