Court Opinion

ID: 37357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:52:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:39.470700
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 17, 2004

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-50642
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TOMMY LEE CATHEY,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                   USDC No. 1:03-CR-230-ALL-SS
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tommy Lee Cathey

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro,

377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to the United

States Sentencing Guidelines.   The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.