Court Opinion

ID: 9791520
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:12:49.937637+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:36.767136
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Judge
(concurring in results) :
I concur in the results reached by the majority opinion for the reasons that the requirement of a preliminary hearing prior to the hearing on revocation mandated by Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 788, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973), was waived by the defendant’s failure to object; that the notice given by the State’s application to revoke was sufficient to advise defendant that evidence would be introduced that he committed the offense of Public Intoxication in violation of the conditions of his probation and that sufficient competent evidence was introduced to justify the finding of the trial judge that he in fact committed that offense.