Court Opinion

ID: 8678319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:34:29.126976+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.089894
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Melvin Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:95-cr-00011-GMG-1 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.