Court Opinion

ID: 993853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:14:02.962655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:50.422665
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7275

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HAROLD DIGGS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-91-65, CA-97-91-5-BO)

Submitted:   December 11, 1997         Decided:     December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Diggs, Nos. CR-91-65; CA-97-91-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. July 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2