Court Opinion

ID: 1403384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:58:39.733563+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:05:09.553967
License: Public Domain

307 S.W.3d 226 (2010)
Carol M. RAINES, Respondent,
v.
John W. RAINES, Appellant.
No. ED 92198.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 6, 2010.
Robert J. Maurer, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Mary Ann Weems, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John W. Raines appeals from the trial court's Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court's decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Slattery v. Slattery, 185 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended *227 opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).