Court Opinion

ID: 9798973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 05:38:57.702088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:18.058080
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiffs Adam Richards, Brett Stewart, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Calguns Foundation (collectively, “Richards”) brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Yolo County and its Sheriff, Ed Prieto (collectively, “Prieto”), alleging that the Yolo County policy for issuing concealed-carry permits violates the Second Amendment. Specifically, Richards argues that Yolo County’s policy, in light of the California regulatory regime as a whole, abridges the Second Amendment right to bear arms because its definition of “good cause”1 prevents a responsible, law-abiding citizen from carrying a handgun in public for the lawful purpose of self-defense. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court concluded that Yolo County’s policy did not infringe Richard’s Second Amendment rights. It thus denied Richard’s motion for summary judgment and granted Prieto’s.
In light of our disposition of the same issue in Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971, 742 F.3d 1144, 2014 WL 555862 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2014), we conclude that the district court in this case erred in denying Richard’s motion for summary judgment because the Yolo County policy impermissibly infringes on the Second Amendment right to bear arms in lawful self-defense.
REVERSED and REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Yolo County's policy provides that "self protection and protection of family (without credible threats of violence)” are "invalid reasons” for requesting a permit.