Court Opinion

ID: 2733289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-16 19:00:39.340734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:07:42.549797
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-10941    Date Filed: 09/16/2014   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-10941
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00565-RAL-EAJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JAQUES D. RANDOLPH,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (September 16, 2014)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-10941    Date Filed: 09/16/2014   Page: 2 of 2

      Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Randolph’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2