Court Opinion

ID: 6880009
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 21:13:32.623458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:34.010798
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the district court, 30 F.Supp. 884, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial and upon the authority of Second National Bank of Reading v. Yeager, 268 Pa. 167, 111 A. 159; Speier v. Michelson, 303 Pa. 66, 154 A. 127, and Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet, 124 Pa.Super. 414, 188 A. 631, the judgment appealed from is affirmed..