Court Opinion

ID: 1014293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:14:38.245515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:40.534544
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Henry McKinley Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Scott,
  
  No. CR-00-98 (E.D.Va. Apr. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
   
   *554
   
  materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED