Court Opinion

ID: 9554839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-10 00:00:28.679511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:36:50.471896
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-30352         Document: 00516852667             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/09/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-30352
                                                                                        FILED
                                                                                      August 9, 2023
                                      ____________
                                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
   Jerry Rogers, Jr.,                                                                      Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Randy Smith, Sheriff; Danny Culpeper; Keith Canizaro,

                                              Defendants—Appellants.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                                USDC No. 2:20-CV-517
                      ______________________________

   Before Clement, Elrod, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record in this interlocutory
   appeal, and having heard argument, we hold that the district court did not err
   in its summary judgment determinations.                   We AFFIRM. See 5th
   Cir. R. 47.6. The pending motion to strike is GRANTED as the court
   lacks jurisdiction over the discovery dispute.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.