Court Opinion

ID: 3071944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:41:51.264719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:45.140616
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-14-00147-CV

                                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                  TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                             TYLER, TEXAS

                                                            §
IN RE: D. A. B.,
                                                            §       ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
A JUVENILE
                                                            §

                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             PER CURIAM
       Relator, D.A.B., has filed a postconviction petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking
relief from his conviction for aggravated robbery. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

                                                  BACKGROUND1
       On July 15, 2008, D.A.B., a juvenile, was detained on a charge of aggravated robbery.
He was subsequently prosecuted and convicted for the offense and sent to the Texas Youth
Commission. Later, he was transferred to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Institutional
Division, where he is presently incarcerated.
       On February 7, 2013, D.A.B. filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the juvenile
court alleging new evidence of actual innocence and prosecutorial misconduct. The juvenile
court conducted an evidentiary hearing, and eleven months later, forwarded findings of fact and
conclusions of law to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. That court dismissed the writ for
want of jurisdiction. The juvenile court then directed the Angelina County District Clerk to
forward the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, along with the reporter’s record of
the evidentiary hearing, to the Texas Supreme Court.                      According to D.A.B., that court is

       1
           The facts recited in this section are derived solely from D.A.B.’s habeas petition.
“holding the Writ filed [on] April 12, 2014]” pending this court’s disposition in the instant
proceeding.

                                                    DISCUSSION
         A person confined pursuant to an adjudication and disposition in juvenile court is entitled
to seek habeas corpus relief in the appropriate court. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 56.01(o) (West
2014). However, the circumstances under which this court has original habeas jurisdiction are
narrow. Specifically, this court has original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus only
when it appears that a person is restrained in his liberty “by virtue of an order, process, or
commitment issued by a court or judge because of the violation of an order, judgment, or decree
previously made, rendered, or entered by the court or judge in a civil case.” See TEX. GOV’T
CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004).
         We do, however, have jurisdiction to review, by direct appeal, a trial court’s denial of a
juvenile’s postconviction petition for writ of habeas corpus. See generally, e.g., In re M.P.A.,
No. 03-08-00337-CV, 2010 WL 2789649 (Tex. App.–Austin July 14, 2010) (mem. op.), rev’d in
part and remanded on other grounds, 364 S.W.3d 277 (Tex. 2012); In re J.W.A., No. 03-03-
00464-CV, 2005 WL 2574024 (Tex. App.–Austin Oct. 13, 2005, no pet.). D.A.B. did not file a
notice of appeal in this case. Moreover, D.A.B.’s habeas petition does not meet the requirements
for a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1. But even if we could construe the petition as a
notice of appeal, we cannot determine from the documents provided that an appealable order,
such as an order denying habeas relief, has been signed.          See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(2)
(requiring that notice of appeal state date of judgment or order appealed from).

                                                   CONCLUSION
         This court lacks original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus under the facts
presented here. Moreover, D.A.B.’s habeas petition cannot be construed as a notice of appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss D.A.B.’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. § 22.221(d).
Opinion delivered June 11, 2014.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

                                                    (PUBLISH)

                                                           2
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                             JUNE 11, 2014

                                         NO. 12-14-00147-CV

                                           D. A. B.,
                                            Relator
                                              V.
                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                          Respondent

                                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                      ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of habeas corpus
filed by D.A.B., who is the defendant in Cause No. JV-3647, pending on the docket of the
County Court at Law #1 of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of habeas corpus
having been filed herein on June 4, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, because it
is the opinion of this Court that this Court lacks original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas
corpus, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for
writ of habeas corpus be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.