Court Opinion

ID: 1007947
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:32:41.693794+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:19.261990
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6482

ALVIN GRIGSBY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DARWIN GUYTON, Detective; PAUL EBERT; RICHARD
SANBORN, Mr.,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-91-2)

Submitted:   June 20, 2002                 Decided:   June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Grigsby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alvin Grigsby appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   Grigsby v. Guyton, No. CA-02-91-2 (E.D. Va. Feb.

19, 2002).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2