Court Opinion

ID: 9751784
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 17:03:59.633116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:59.185055
License: Public Domain

STEIN and LONG, JJ.,
dissenting.
We would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kestin’s thoughtful opinion for the Appellate Division, Clymer v. Summit Bancorp., 334 N.J.Super. 252, 253-57, 758 A.2d 652 (2000).
For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 5.
For affirmance — Justices STEIN and LONG — 2.