Court Opinion

ID: 2903488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 20:29:07.681421+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:45.895379
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ,

                            Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                            Appellee.
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 § 

No. 08-09-00108-CR

Appeal from the

227th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC#2008CR0883W)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 This is an appeal from a judgment adjudicating Appellant guilty of the offense of possession
of heroin in an amount less than one gram.  The court sentenced Appellant to two years' confinement
in a state jail facility.  We affirm.
	Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094,
18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the
appeal.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684

(Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State,
436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to Appellant,
and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. 
No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeal.  The judgment is affirmed.

						GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

September 23, 2009

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)