Court Opinion

ID: 992767
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:57:13.302045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:52.558278
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-6819

JOSEPH EDWIN BROMFIELD,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; TALMADGE L. BARNETT,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-95-553-5-HC-BO)

Submitted:   March 31, 1997                 Decided:   August 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Edwin Bromfield, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended
by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Bromfield v. Freeman, No.

CA-95-553-5-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 1996). We deny Appellant's

motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2