Court Opinion

ID: 9392687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-05 20:03:32.570288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:48.004870
License: Public Domain

Rel: May 5, 2023

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter.
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue,
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections
may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter.

                   Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
                               OCTOBER TERM, 2022-2023
                                _________________________

                                         CR-2022-1128
                                   _________________________

                                   Brandon Lewis McCary

                                                      v.

                                         State of Alabama

                         Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court
                                   (CC-19-2233.70)

McCOOL, Judge.

        Brandon Lewis McCary appeals the Calhoun Circuit Court's

revocation of his probation. We reverse and remand.

        Based on the limited record before us, it appears that in July 2020

McCary was convicted of second-degree burglary and was sentenced to
CR-2022-1128

54 months in prison. That sentence was split, and McCary was ordered

to serve 396 days in prison followed by 3 years 5 months and 1 day on

probation.

     On August 15, 2022, probation officer Katie Lee of Etowah County

filed a delinquency report alleging that McCary had violated the

conditions of his probation by absconding. Specifically, the report stated

that, after testing positive for THC, McCary was placed in a drug-

treatment program.      He was discharged from that program for

noncompliance, but he failed to contact Officer Lee upon discharge, even

though he had been instructed to do so. Officer Lee contacted McCary's

wife, who informed Officer Lee that McCary had enrolled in another

recovery program. Officer Lee contacted the director of that program.

The director told Officer Lee that McCary had checked into the program

over the weekend, but the director was unable to locate McCary on the

day Officer Lee contacted the director. Officer Lee concluded that she

had exhausted all available avenues to locate McCary and that he was

actively avoiding supervision.

     On September 22, 2022, the circuit court held a revocation hearing

during which McCary was represented by counsel. At the hearing, the

                                    2
CR-2022-1128

State presented the testimony of two probation officers -- Reginald Smith

and Taneria Daniels. Both of those officers testified concerning McCary's

alleged probation violation, but their testimony was based solely on

Officer Lee's delinquency report. In fact, both Officer Smith and Officer

Daniels testified that they had no firsthand knowledge of the alleged

violation. (R. 6, 10). Officer Lee did not testify at the hearing. McCary's

attorney moved to dismiss the case on the basis that hearsay evidence

cannot form the sole basis of revocation. The circuit court denied that

motion. After the hearing, the circuit court entered a written order

revoking McCary's probation. McCary appealed.

     On appeal, McCary argues that the circuit court erred in revoking

his probation based solely on hearsay testimony. The State concedes that

the evidence presented by the State at the revocation hearing was

entirely hearsay evidence, and the State asserts that "the circuit court

exceeded its discretion in revoking [McCary's] probation." (State's brief

at 7.) We agree.

     In Corbitt v. State, [Ms. CR-21-0240, July 8, 2022] ___ So. 3d ___

(Ala. Crim. App. 2022), this Court stated:

         " 'It is well settled that hearsay evidence may not form
     the sole basis for revoking an individual's probation.'

                                    3
CR-2022-1128

     Goodgain v. State, 755 So. 2d 591, 592 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
     (citing Clayton v. State, 669 So. 2d 220 (Ala Crim. App. 1995)).
     However, 'hearsay evidence is admissible in a revocation
     proceeding,' Beckham v. State, 872 So. 2d 208, 211 (Ala. Crim.
     App. 2003), and a combination of both hearsay and
     nonhearsay evidence may be sufficient to warrant revocation.
     See, e.g., Askew v. State, 197 So. 3d 547, 548-49 (Ala. Crim.
     App. 2015). '[W]hen the State presents a mixture of hearsay
     and nonhearsay evidence to show that a defendant violated
     his probation by committing a new offense, the circuit court
     cannot revoke a defendant's probation for that violation
     unless the nonhearsay evidence connects the defendant to the
     alleged offense.' Walker v. State, 294 So. 3d 825, 832 (Ala.
     Crim. App. 2019) (emphasis in original)."

___ So. 3d at ___.

     In the present case, the State presented only hearsay evidence to

support the circuit court's finding that McCary had violated the

conditions of his probation.    At the revocation hearing, the State

presented the testimony of two witnesses who, by their own testimony,

had no firsthand knowledge of McCary's alleged violation. The witnesses'

knowledge of the alleged violation came solely from a third person whose

testimony was not offered at the revocation hearing.

     Because the State failed to present any nonhearsay evidence to

establish that McCary had violated the conditions of his probation, the

circuit court erred in revoking McCary's probation. Therefore, this Court

                                    4
CR-2022-1128

reverses the circuit court's order revoking McCary's probation and

remands this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

     REVERSED AND REMANDED.

     Windom, P.J., and Kellum, Cole, and Minor, JJ., concur.

                                   5