Court Opinion

ID: 9813481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 23:06:44.550159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:29:26.432417
License: Public Domain

dissenting.
I must confess that my concerns with the conclusion the court reaches today may *839spring from the potential conflict between Tennessee’s vehicle registration laws and the state’s requirements for obtaining a certificate of title, and the court’s interpretation in Couch v. Cockroft, 490 S.W.2d 713 (Tenn.Ct.App.1972) of the entrustment provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code. I am persuaded by the district court’s analysis of Couch, and I agree that there was new value in the transfer of the MSOs. For these reasons I would affirm on the basis of the district court’s affir-mance of the bankruptcy court opinion.