Court Opinion

ID: 9443298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 19:17:06.050578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:26.605105
License: Public Domain

F-AHY, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I concur in the result. Relief by way of forfeiture of the charter of the appellee-would not be an appropriate remedy for denial of membership and the complaint fails to show that appellee is a public or *411quasi-public corporation essential to the relief he seeks through admission to membership.
With respect to forfeiture of charter because of appellee’s occupation of space in the courthouse appellant does not have standing to obtain such relief. See Laughlin v. Reynolds, Commissioner Of Public Buildings, 90 U.S.App.D.C. -, 196 F.2d S63. In this connection it appears that the library facilities which occupy the space in question are available to appellant upon terms which appear reasonable insofar as the facts before us disclose.