Court Opinion

ID: 40841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:55:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:35.751853
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 23, 2006

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                            No. 04-21017
                        Conference Calendar

MARIO JOSEPH NIETO,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

B. REEVES-GALLOWAY, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-
Institutional Division Correctional Officer; J. KARNES,
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional
Division Correctional Officer; M. BRIGHT, Texas Department
of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Correctional
Officer; B. GRAHAM, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-
Institutional Division Correctional Officer; M. HYDE, Texas
Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division
Correctional Officer; J. RAGAN, Texas Department of Criminal
Justice-Institutional Division Correctional Officer, Inmate
Property Officer; T. SMITH, Texas Department of Criminal
Justice-Institutional Division Correctional Officer;
J. ROSSER, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional
Division Correctional Officer; R. NEWLON, Texas Department of
Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Correctional
Officer; G. GRIFFIN, Texas Department of Criminal
Justice-Institutional Division Correctional Officer,

                                    Defendants-Appellees.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:04-CV-1662
                      --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 04-21017
                                 -2-

     Mario Nieto, Texas inmate # 591239, appeals the dismissal of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B).    Nieto’s arguments that the defendants subjected

him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth

Amendment because they failed to protect him from another inmate

and used excessive force lack legal bases.      See Jones v.

Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 326 (5th Cir. 1999); 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(e); Glenn v. City of Tyler, 242 F.3d 307, 314 (5th Cir.

2001).    Nieto’s claim that the defendants denied him access to

the courts is likewise without a legal basis.      See Walker v.

Navarro County Jail, 4 F.3d 410, 413 (5th Cir. 1993).

     Nieto’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.      See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     The dismissal of Nieto’s complaint as frivolous and of this

appeal as frivolous each count as “strikes” for purposes of the

three-strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).      See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).      Nieto is warned that

if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.      See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

     IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.