Court Opinion

ID: 2964175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:21:43.77857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:44.210104
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          June 24, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1502

                                 JOSE QUINONES-PITA,

                                Petitioner, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Respondent, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

                    [Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr, and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Jose Quinones-Pita on brief pro se.
            __________________
            Guillermo  Gil,  United States  Attorney,  Jorge  E. Vega-Pacheco,
            ______________                             ______________________
        Assistant United  States  Attorney, and  Nelson Perez-Sosa,  Assistant
                                                 _________________
        United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.   We have reviewed  the parties' briefs  and
                 __________

            the  record on appeal.  We affirm essentially for the reasons

            stated in the district court's opinion and order, dated March

            15, 1995.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________

                                         -2-