Court Opinion

ID: 1000879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:47:18.94391+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:17.078643
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7054

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES E. CARR,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-66-N)

Submitted:   February 10, 2000         Decided:     February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James E. Carr seeks to appeal the district court’s orders de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Carr, No. CR-93-66-N (E.D. Va.

Sept. 24, July 10, 1998 and July 15, 1999).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. We also deny Carr’s motions to appoint

counsel, to authorize preparation of a transcript at government

expense, and to amend his informal brief.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2