Court Opinion

ID: 9781332
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 16:31:19.496174+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:34:24.260657
License: Public Domain

Justice PLEICONES.
I concur in part and dissent in part. We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision which upheld the family court’s finding that the insurance requirement here was not a modifiable form of support. I agree with the majority that this finding is an error of law, one which we should reverse. I dissent, however, from that portion of the majority opinion which undertakes to review the record and to make the factual determination that petitioner demonstrated a substantial change of circumstances. In my opinion, this factual determination is beyond our authority on certiorari. See *123Lewis v. Lewis, 392 S.C. 381, 709 S.E.2d 650 (2011) (Pleicones, J., dissenting).
I concur in the decision to remand the matter to the family court, but would leave the issues of changed circumstances and further relief to that tribunal.