Court Opinion

ID: 665088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:29:20+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:58.604582
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 12
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Joseph Mario TURNER, Petitioner Appellant,v.William SMITH, Warden;  Attorney General for the State ofMaryland, Respondents Appellees.
No. 93-6970.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.Decided March 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-93-1175-JFM).

1
Joseph Mario Turner, appellant pro se.

2
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Thomas Kevin Clancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

3
D.Md.

4
AFFIRMED.

5
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

6
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Turner v. Smith, No. CA-93-1175-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 31, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED