Court Opinion

ID: 9743002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 21:23:54.725469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:38.340430
License: Public Domain

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.
¶ 57. {concurring). My understanding of the majority's opinion in this matter is that because the admission of the identification evidence in this case would not violate the defendant Hibl's right to due process, we need not and do not modify at this time this court's earlier decision in State v. Marshall, 92 Wis. 2d 101, 118, 284 N.W.2d 592 (1979). Majority op., ¶ 47. With that caveat, I join all but paragraph 46 of the majority's opinion.