Court Opinion

ID: 5917346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:16:27.365883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:14.915540
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the de*777fendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), imposed October 28, 2008, upon his conviction of robbery in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on March 22, 2000.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to include the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Skelos, J.E, Chambers, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.