Court Opinion

ID: 539378
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:55.051441
License: Public Domain

900 F.2d 250Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Ralph W. PACKARD, Warden, MHC;  Leon Brown, Chief Security,MHC;  Elizabeth Nick, MHC, Mailroom Supervisor;  PatriciaClark, MHC, Assistant Mailroom Supervisor;  Patricia Henson,MHC, Mailroom Employee, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7819.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 1990.Decided March 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge.  (C/A No. 87-2537-PN).
William Christopher Brown, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Karen U. Smith, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md. for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
William Christopher Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Brown v. Packard, C/A No. 87-2537-PN (D.Md. Sept. 26, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED