Court Opinion

ID: 1005348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:55:16.630921+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:00.679591
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6555

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MITCHELL   WASHINGTON   KING,     a/k/a   Mitchel
Washington King,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-95-108, CA-99-1034-1)

Submitted:   August 31, 2001              Decided:   September 21, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mitchell Washington King, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mitchell Washington King seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. King, Nos. CR-95-108; CA-99-1034-1

(M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 24, 2001, entered Jan. 25, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2