Court Opinion

ID: 9401488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-13 14:11:22.684944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:53.282583
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                     San Antonio, Texas
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                        No. 04-22-00344-CR

                                      Luis Carlos MARTINEZ,
                                              Appellant

                                                 v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 2021CR6587
                            Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                  Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                  Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 7, 2023

APPEAL DISMISSED

           On May 23, 2023, appellant filed a pro se “Motion to End Appeal” in which he stated his

desire to “continue with his appointed sentence of 7yrs TDCJ.” Appellant signed his motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a) (requiring appellant and his or her attorney to sign the written motion to

dismiss). The next day, appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” in which

he “advocates for [his] client’s wishes.” Id. Both motions are granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

                                           PER CURIAM

Do not publish