Court Opinion

ID: 48929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:51:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:31.235748
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 4, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-51165
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR OMAR CASTRO-SANCHEZ,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Texas
                    USDC No. 3:06-CR-500-ALL
                      --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cesar Omar

Castro-Sanchez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United

States v. Esparza-Gonzalez, 268 F.3d 272, 273-74 (5th Cir. 2001),

which held that the district court’s failure to verify that the

defendant and his counsel had read and discussed the presentence

report did not require an automatic reversal.   The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.