Court Opinion

ID: 9783314
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 19:43:45.086683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:22.215186
License: Public Domain

McCLENDON, J.,
agrees in part and dissents in part.
11Respectfully, I agree with the majority opinion with the exception of the affirmation of the denial of the motion to continue and to intervene. This ruling is premature. The record is unclear as to whether the judgment denying the motion to continue and to intervene was rendered while a recusal motion was pending. If such judgment was rendered prior to disposition of the motion to continue and to intervene, then the judgment would be an absolute nullity. In re Sassone, 07-0651 (La.6/29/07), 959 So.2d 859. Thus, I would remand to the district court for supplementation of the record on this limited issue.