Court Opinion

ID: 8603473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 01:00:16.714963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:13.895140
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10459      Document: 00516556050         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/23/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                  No. 22-10459                        November 23, 2022
                                Summary Calendar
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   David Bustos, Jr.,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-25

   Before Jolly, Jones, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent David Bustos, Jr., has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Bustos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10459     Document: 00516556050         Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/23/2022

                                  No. 22-10459

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2