Court Opinion

ID: 2716733
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-08 18:14:07.242114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:40.904220
License: Public Domain

OSCN Found Document:YAZEL v. WILLIAM K. WARREN MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER

	
				

OSCN navigation

        Home

        Courts

        Court Dockets

        Legal Research

        Calendar

        Help

						Previous Case

						Top Of Index

						This Point in Index

						Citationize

						Next Case

						Print Only

YAZEL v. WILLIAM K. WARREN MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER2014 OK 58Case Number: 111643; Comp. w/111502Decided: 06/24/2014THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMACite as: 2014 OK 58, __ P.3d __
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. 
 

KEN YAZEL, Tulsa County Assessor, Petitioner/Appellant,
v.
THE WILLIAM K. WARREN MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER, INC., an Oklahoma not-for-profit corporation; MONTEREAU, Inc., an Oklahoma not-for-profit corporation; TULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC., an Oklahoma not-for-profit corporation, and BAPTIST VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OF OKLAHOMA, INC., f/k/a Baptist Village Retirement Centers of Oklahoma, Inc., an Oklahoma not-for-profit corporation, d/b/a Baptist Village of Owasso, Respondents/Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, DIVISION IVHONORABLE E. MARK BARCUS, TRIAL JUDGE

¶0 The Tulsa County Assessor assessed ad valorem taxes on portions of real property owned by the respondent/appellees (taxpayers). The taxpayers challenged the assessment and the County Board of Equalization determined that the properties were not taxable. The Assessor appealed to the Tulsa County District Court which found in favor of the taxpayers. The Assessor again appealed but the Court of Civil Appeals dismissed the appeal because the Assessor was not represented by the district attorney, nor the State Attorney General. On certiorari, we hold that pursuant to our pronouncement in the companion case No. 111,502, Yazel v. William Warren Medical Research Center, 2014 OK __, ___ P.3d __, the county assessors may employ counsel to represent them in court proceedings including appeals from the Board of Equalization. Accordingly, we remand the matter to the Court of Civil Appeals to address the merits of the appeal.

COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OPINION VACATED;CAUSE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Leisa S. Weintraub, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Joel L. Wohlgemuth, David R. Ross, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee Warren Medical.
Kenneth Louis Hunt, R. Mark Petrich, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee Tulsa Jewish Community.
Douglas M. Borochoff, George E. Gibbs, Charles Anthony McSoud, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellee Baptist Village.
Brian Cramer, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, George Patrick O'Hara, Edmond, Oklahoma, Mart Tisdal, Clinton, Oklahoma, for Amicus Curaie, County Assessors Association. County Officers and Deputies Association.

KAUGER, J.:

¶1 This cause No. 111,643 Ken Yazel, Tulsa County Assessor v. The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al (Yazel 2) and its companion case No. 111,502 Ken Yazel, Tulsa County Assessor v. The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al (Yazel 1) involve the dispositive issue of whether 68 Ohio St. 2011 §2880.1(D)1 requires a county assessor to be represented by a district attorney or by the Oklahoma Tax Commission before an appeal from the Board of Equalization may proceed to the Courts. We hold that pursuant to our pronouncement in the companion case No. 111,502, Yazel 1, the county assessors may employ counsel to represent them in court proceedings including appeals from the Board of Equalization. Accordingly, we remand the matter to the Court of Civil Appeals to address the merits of the appeal.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OPINION VACATED;CAUSE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, TAYLOR, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur.
WINCHESTER, J., dissents.

FOOTNOTES

1 Title 68 Ohio St. 2011 §2880.1(D) provides:
D. In such appeals to the district court and to the Supreme Court and in requests for declaratory judgment it shall be the duty of the district attorney to appear for and represent the county assessor. The General Counsel or an attorney for the Tax Commission may appear in such appeals or requests for declaratory judgment on behalf of the county assessor, either upon request of the district attorney for assistance, or upon request of the county assessor. It shall be the mandatory duty of the board of county commissioners and the county excise board to provide the necessary funds to enable the county assessor to pay the costs necessary to be incurred in perfecting appeals and requests for declaratory judgment made by the county assessor to the courts.

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This DocumentCite
Name
Level
None Found.Citationizer: Table of AuthorityCite
Name
Level
Title 68. Revenue and Taxation CiteNameLevel 68 Ohio St. 2880.1, Right to Appeal - Notice of Appeal - Duty of District Attorney - PresumptionDiscussed