Court Opinion

ID: 2864948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:48:09.288897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:45.701221
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00058-CR

Michael Fruin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 961194, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

	Appellant Michael Fruin pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a child.  See Tex. Pen.
Code Ann. § 22.011 (West Supp. 2002).  He was convicted of this offense and placed on community
supervision.  He now appeals from an order revoking supervision based in part of his pleas of true
to some of the alleged violations.
	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed. 
 We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
	The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

					______________________________________
					Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed:   August 30, 2002
Do Not Publish