Court Opinion

ID: 7432162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:54:52.044961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:29.211803
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 3, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.
*730Petitioner’s application for attorney s fees is also denied.
DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.