Court Opinion

ID: 1001225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:52:22.209517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:39:39.264100
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7704

EDWARD GALES,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

OFFICER LUGI, a/k/a David L. Luebke,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-965-AM)

Submitted:   March 23, 2000                 Decided:   March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Gales, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Morris, III, BEALE, BAL-
FOUR, DAVIDSON & ETHERINGTON, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Edward Gales appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.     We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Gales v. Lugi, No. CA-99-965-AM (E.D. Va. Dec.

3, 1999).   We further deny Gales’ motion for discovery and produc-

tion of documents.     We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2