Court Opinion

ID: 5667529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 13:49:46.505321+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:29.030499
License: Public Domain

Coffin, S.
This court cannot try the question of the alleged indebtedness, but must regard the claim of the petitioner, although disputed, as sufficient to entitle her to make an application of this character. Nevertheless the prayer of her petition must be denied. She asks for a. bond in the penalty of $600; the admitted debt being $60, and her claim $240, making $300 —the half of the proposed penalty. She does not claim that, the value of the assets in this State exceeds $100, which is the | amount stated in the petition for the letters'. Now, by section: 2699 of the Code, before such letters can be issued, the persons to whom they are awarded must qualify as prescribed in section 2667, to wit, by giving a bond in a penalty not less than' twice the value of the personal estate of the deceased, except that the penalty of the bond may, in the discretion of the surrogate, be in a sum not exceeding twice the amount which appears to be due from the decedent to residents of the State. This discretionary power was exercised in this case. It would seem that unless the surrogate exercise this discretion tire penalty of the bond should be twice the amount of the value of the assets in this State, and then, in this case, the penal sum would have been $200. It would be absurd to hold that the Legislature intended that where the amount of the assets was only $100, and the amount of the debts $5,000, the executors should give a bond in the penal sum of $10,000. The amount of the penalty *389of an administrator’s bond is fixed, not with regard to the debts the intestate owed, but the value of his personal estate. The only object of the bond here is to secure the creditors to the extent of the value of the assets. .The prayer of the petition is therefore denied, with $10 costs of the motion.