Court Opinion

ID: 9397378
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-25 15:01:29.774304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:24.376437
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11255   Document: 11-1    Date Filed: 05/25/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-11255
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
                                                   Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       GEORGE W. MAXWELL, III,
       Attorney/Senior Judge,
       CHRISTINA MARIE SANCHEZ SERRANO,
       Domestic Violence Injunction Judge,
       GEORGE C. TURNER, JR.,
       WILLIAM DAVID DUGAN,
       Circuit Judges,
       MICHELLE L. NABERHAUS,
       Family Judge, et al.,
USCA11 Case: 23-11255     Document: 11-1      Date Filed: 05/25/2023    Page: 2 of 3

       2                      Opinion of the Court                23-11255

                                                    Defendants-Appellees.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01587-RBD-DCI
                           ____________________

       Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to ﬁle a no-
       tice of appeal on or before May 18, 2022, which was 30 days follow-
       ing the date judgment was deemed entered on the district court’s
       November 18, 2021 dismissal order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R.
       App. P. 4(a)(7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, Lindberg did not ﬁle a
       notice of appeal until April 8, 2023.
              Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
       Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
       ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
       pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
       1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
       appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
       entertain an appeal that is out of time).
USCA11 Case: 23-11255    Document: 11-1     Date Filed: 05/25/2023   Page: 3 of 3

       23-11255             Opinion of the Court                      3

             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
       hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.