Court Opinion

ID: 2894155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 22:56:12.04433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:04.895018
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-04-0582-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

APRIL 12, 2006

______________________________

GARY O. GARDNER, BEULAH DARLENE GARDNER, 
HOLLISTER GARDNER, APPELLANTS

V.

LARRY PICKARD STEWART, SHERIFF OF SWISHER COUNTY, TEXAS;
HONORABLE ED SELF, ACTING AS SWISHER COUNTY JUDGE
IN CAUSE NO. 1795,  APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NO. A10362-02-10; HONORABLE JACK D. YOUNG, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

	Remaining convinced that our original disposition was correct, we overrule the
motion for rehearing of Gary O. Gardner, Beulah Darlene Gardner, and Hollister Gardner,
with these additional comments.
	The Gardners allege error in our decision based upon our consideration of the
jurisdiction question because it was not raised by Sheriff Stewart and Judge Self.  However,
they overlook our holding that we did not have jurisdiction to address the issues, and
references in our January 14, 2004, Memorandum Opinion on Motion for Rehearing in
Cause No. 07-02-0513-CV,  to section 65.023 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
Code Annotated (Vernon 1997), and to Burton v. Cantu, 960 S.W.2d 91, 95
(Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1997, no writ).  
	Accordingly, the Gardners' motion for rehearing is overruled.  

							Don H. Reavis
							     Justice