Court Opinion

ID: 998745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:15:27.937317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:30.827463
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6244

THOMAS LYNN ANDREWS, SR.,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-97-828-1)

Submitted:   May 13, 1999                   Decided:   May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Lynn Andrews, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Thomas Lynn Andrews, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason-

ing of the district court.    See Andrews v. North Carolina Attorney

General, No. CA-97-828-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                   2