Court Opinion

ID: 9556210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-16 16:06:16.15304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:45.179353
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed August 16, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1860
                       Lower Tribunal No. 14-17912
                          ________________

                          Reynaldo Santana,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

     Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc., et al.,
                                 Appellees.

     An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes
Simon, Judge.

      Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for
appellant.

     McGlinchey Stafford, and William L. Grimsley (Jacksonville); Albert D.
Rey, P.A., and Albert D. Rey, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
       Affirmed. See Watson v. Vafides, 212 So. 2d 358, 362 (Fla. 1st DCA

1968) (“The object of a notice of public sale is to inform the Public of the

nature and condition of the property to be sold, and of the time, place, and

terms of the sale.”); 37 Fla. Jur. 2d Mortgages, Etc. § 300 (2023) (same); see

also Tanis v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 289 So. 3d 517, 521 (Fla. 3d DCA

2019) (alterations in original) (quoting McQuiddy v. Ware, 87 U.S. 14, 18

(1873)) (“Crucially, here, ‘[t]here is no averment that [appellants] did not have

actual notice of the proceedings against [them] in time to protect [their]

rights.’”).

                                       2