Court Opinion

ID: 5999251
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:45:29.655693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:13.521807
License: Public Domain

The scope of cross-examination rests in the trial court’s discretion, which is reviewed on appeal only for plain abuse (People v Trinidad, 177 AD2d 286, lv denied 79 NY2d 865). A review of the record fails to demonstrate an abuse of such discretion in the trial court’s rulings precluding defendant’s cross-examination of the complainant about whether she made false criminal allegations against two other men and whether she traded sex for cocaine prior to the subject incident. Defendant failed to proffer a sufficient good faith basis to require the court to permit inquiry into either of these collateral matters. It should be noted that, on the oral argument, defense counsel conceded that the questions were for impeachment of the complainant’s general credibility only. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.