Court Opinion

ID: 992148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:47:25.31147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:50.404232
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

BYRON LEE WRAY, a/k/a Slick,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-89-127-D, CA-96-97-1)

Submitted:   May 1, 1997                     Decided:   May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron Lee Wray, Appellant Pro Se. United States Attorney, Greens-
boro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Wray, Nos. CR-89-127-D; CA-96-97-1
(M.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2