Court Opinion

ID: 1004252
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:35.14823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:31.367122
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6176

FRED ARISTOTLE DAVIS, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CHARLENE DAY, Assistant Public Defender, Com-
monwealth of Virginia; DAVID HICKS, Common-
wealth Attorney for Commonwealth of Virginia,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-627-3)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                    Decided:   May 4, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-

plaint.    We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Day, No. CA-00-627-3

(E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2