Court Opinion

ID: 6136629
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 21:44:39.978717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:31.643903
License: Public Domain

Follett, J.:
Appeal from an order of a county judge adjudging defendant in- contempt for disobeying an order of the county judge which required defendant to be examined in proceedings supplementary to an execution issued out of the Supreme Court.
*324' This order was made in the course of supplementary proceedings (Code Civil Pro., § 2457) and is reviewable in the first instance, only by “the court out of which the execution was issued,” upon a motion to vacate, of modify the order. (Code Civil Pro., § 2433 ; Chamberlain v. Gallup, 25 Hun, 318.) An order made by a court oh such a motion may be reviewed on appeal by the General Term.
The order reviewed in Hart v. Johnson (43 Hun, 505) was granted by a Special Term. The order reviewed in Baker v. Herkimer (43 Hun, 86) was granted by a County Court (not by a county judge) and the proceeding was supplementary to an execution issued out of the County Court upon a judgment entered upon a transcript of a justice’s judgment, and the order was appealable under the second subdivision of section 2433.
The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Hardin, P. J., and Martin, J., concurred.
Appeal dismissed with ten dollars costs including disbursements.