Court Opinion

ID: 5177338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 01:08:10.335169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:23.519033
License: Public Domain

JUDGE TERRY
dissenting.
T47 For the reasons stated in my dissent in The Triple Crown at Observatory Village Ass'n, Inc., v. Vill. Homes of Colo., Inc., 2013 COA 144, - P.3d -, 2013 WL 5761028, I believe that the division should not have- and indeed, was precluded from-accepting the petition for interlocutory review of this case under CAR. 4.2. See § 18-4-104.5, C.R.S.2018. Given my previously stated views, I do not believe it is proper for me to opine on the merits of this appeal, and I do not do so.