Court Opinion

ID: 9829514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:23:12.392904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:02.497125
License: Public Domain

*340On Motion for Rehearing and Additional Findings of Fact
Appellant filed a' motion for rehearing, which has been overruled. Appellant also filed motion for additional findings of fact, which motion has been granted, and in response to said motion we find:
1. That the inclosure marked on the plat in original opinion as O-D-E-F-G- was made by Eaves in 1921. It was no part of the improvements at the time he bought and took possession of the land in 1908.
2. The house marked “new house,” situated within the inclosure O-D-E-F-G, was placed there in 1921. It was before that situated on the Hentz tract, and was by Eaves moved over onto the Denmore in 1921.
3. When Eaves bought and took possession of the 160 acres, the fenced improvements on the Denmore were embraced within the space marked H-I-J-C-G-K, -the remaining portions of the improvements shown on the plat being on the Hentz. The dwelling house at the time Eaves bought and took possession, 1908, was on the Hentz, and the inclosures as shown substantially existed until 1921, when the other improvements, shown as O-D-E-F-G, with the new house thereon were made by Eaves.