Court Opinion

ID: 9944447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-26 17:04:50.176254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:01:12.746907
License: Public Domain

ORDER
On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, appellee's opposition thereto, notice of consent of the parties for the Public Defender Service to participate as amicus curiae, consent of appellant for entry of appearance by Public Defender Service as amicus curiae and filing of brief, the memorandum of Public Defender Service as amicus curiae in support of petition, and the letter pursuant to Rule 28 (k) from the Public Defender Service, it is
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter the appearance of the Public Defender Service as amicus curiae and to file the lodged memorandum of the Public Defender Service as amicus curiae in support of petition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Senior Judge Mack was a member of the merits division in this matter. She retired from the court on December 1, 2001, and did not participate in the consideration of the petition for rehearing.
Associate Judges Ruiz, Reid, Glickman and Washington would grant rehearing en banc.