Court Opinion

ID: 9831902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:27:54.279438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:39.111369
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant has pointed out several clerical errors, which, in some unaccountable way, crept into our original opinion and of which proper correction has been made therein, viz.: (a) On page 537 we are made to say, “Appellant and its subscriber, the bottling company, made a report in writing to the Industrial Accident Board of the issuance of policy TX-5462,” when the finding was made and should have been stated as follows, “Appellant, as to its subscriber, the bottling company,' made a report in writing to the Industrial Accident Board of the issuance of policy TX-5462”; (b) it is erroneously stated that, “Appellee Jetton gave appellant timely notice to produce the original policy No. TX-5462,” when the finding was and should have been stated as follows, “Appellant Jetton gáve appellant timely notice to produce the original policy No. TX-5462, or a certified copy thereof” ; (c) on page 538 the name of the witness therein stated as “Patillo” should be “Parsons” ; (d) on page 538 in the first line appellant is referred to as “Fidelity Surety Company,” instead of “Federal Surety Company,” its correct corporate name; (e) on page 539 the word “inability” is used in the last line of the second paragraph, when the same should have been “disability.”
With the above corrections made, said motion is in all other respects overruled.
Overruled.