Court Opinion

ID: 59906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 03:56:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:53.827799
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                 March 5, 2008
                                No. 07-51014
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BENITO RAMIREZ-NOLASCO

                                           Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Texas
                         USDC No. 3:07-CR-310-ALL

Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benito Ramirez-Nolasco
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580,
582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466
(2000), did not render 18 U.S.C. § 841 and 21 U.S.C. § 960(b) facially
unconstitutional.   The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-51014

     2