Court Opinion

ID: 5080572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 12:18:04.370097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:56:58.501166
License: Public Domain

OPINION
This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant's motion for recusal and disqualification of the trial judge in a criminal prosecution, after the appellant was granted a mistrial. The order complained of is interlocutory. We have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders except in narrow circumstances not *Page 261 Ex parte Robinson, 641 S.W.2d 552, 555 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982) (pretrial appellate review of double jeopardy claims is constitutionally compelled). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. SeeCasias v. State, 503 S.W.2d 262, 265 (Tex.Crim.App. 1973);Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Tex.App. — Tyler 1990, no pet.); TEX.R.APP.P. 41(b)(1). *Page 431