Court Opinion

ID: 3546717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:57:10.98122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:42.473719
License: Public Domain

REQUESTED BY: Senator Karen Kilgarin Nebraska State Legislature State Capitol Building Lincoln, Nebraska 68509
Dear Senator Kilgarin:
In your February 24, 1984, letter you requested our opinion with respect to certain aspects of Neb.Rev.Stat. 44-2828
and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-222.
We understand you wish to know whether the six year period of limitations in § 44-2828 is an absolute unconditional bar for all malpractice actions in view of the Supreme Court's decision in Sacchi v. Blodig, 215 Neb. 817
concerning § 25-222. You also ask whether there are constitutional problems concerning the above statutes.
We have reviewed the recent court decisions, the above statutes, and LB 692 with all amendments to date.
The two statutes are essentially identical. Section44-2828 apparently was intended to cover actions where the physician or hospital is qualified under the Nebraska Hospital Medical Liability Act while § 25-222 covers other professional negligence situations. In Sacchi the Court held that the ten year limitation period in § 25-222 is not an absolute bar for actions in which the plaintiff was under a disability contemplated by Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1213.
It is our opinion in view of the Sacchi decision that the six year limitation in § 44-2828 would also be interpreted as not being an absolute bar of those actions where the plaintiff is an infant or is otherwise under a disability contemplated by Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-213. Any other interpretation probably would subject § 44-2828 to equal protection and due process problems.
There could be equal protection or other constitutional questions raised concerning the differences between the six and ten year periods in the two statutes. However, it appears that LB 692, as amended, would conform the two statutes in all essential respects and avoid such possible constitutional infirmities. We understand that LB 692 would amend § 44-2828 to clearly exclude actions subject to 25-213
and to increase the six year period to ten, the same as in § 25-222.
Please let us know if you have further questions.
Very truly yours, PAUL L. DOUGLAS Attorney General John R. Thompson Deputy Attorney General