Court Opinion

ID: 9840877
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-20 16:06:21.352719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:51.703758
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                     Opinion filed September 20, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-1449
                       Lower Tribunal No. F10-6731
                          ________________

                             Michael Parks,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                         The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.

     Michael Parks, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Morris v. State, 727 So. 2d 975, 977 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)

(“An acquittal in a criminal case does not preclude the judge from

determining that a parole or probation violation has occurred based on the

same conduct.”); Eustache v. State, 248 So. 3d 1097, 1100 (Fla. 2018)

(“Florida courts have consistently treated conduct involving a new criminal

offense, such as [appellant’s] illegal drug possession, as a substantive

violation.”); Flagg v. State, 179 So. 3d 394, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“Where

there has been a substantive violation, such as a new law offense, a

previously designated youthful offender may be sentenced above the six-

year cap up to the statutory maximum for the underlying offenses.”); see also

§ 810.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2010).

                                     2