Court Opinion

ID: 9516478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:43:13.999265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:20.685822
License: Public Domain

*157Prentice, J.
This matter is before us upon the motion of the plaintiff (appellee) entitled “Motion of Appellee for Court to Take Judicial Notice,” filed July 30, 1971, directing our attention to our dismissal of Indiana State Personnel Board, etc. v. Mamie T. Wilson, No. 271S21, 256 Ind. 674, 271 N. E. 2d 448.
Plaintiff hereinbefore filed her motion to dismiss or affirm addressed to numerous deficiencies in the transcript and in Defendant’s brief. The deficiencies pointed out related rules designed primarily for the convenience of this Court, and, in lieu of granting said motion, on June 8, 1971, we granted to Appellants leave to withdraw the record of proceedings and to amend.
Thereafter, on July 26, 1971, we entered an order dismissing the appeal in the case of Indiana State Personnel Board, etc. v. Mamie T. Wilson (supra), because of Appelants’ failure to file a “Motion to Correct Errors” as required by Trial Rule 59(G).
TR. 59(G) provides as follows:
“Motion to Correct Error a Condition to Appeal. In all cases in which a motion to correct errors is the appropriate procedure preliminary to an appeal, such motion shall separately specify as grounds therefor each error relied upon however and whenever arising up to the time of filing such motion. Issues which could be raised upon a motion to correct errors may be considered upon appeal only when included in the motion to correct errors filed with the trial court. A motion to correct errors shall not be required in the case of appeals from interlocutory orders, orders appointing or refusing to appoint a receiver, and from orders in proceedings supplemental to execution.” (Our emphasis)
As said in the Wilson case {supra) :
“Thus, it is the purpose of the rules pertaining to both trial and appellate procedure that the motion to correct errors must be filed in all instances, except for the particular instances provided in TR. 59 (G), so that all matters of which a party complains in any proceedings in the trial court must be first brought to the attention of that court *158and opportunity given to said court to correct said alleged errors before an appeal can be taken. This was not done in this case and this Court is without jurisdiction of this attempted appeal.”
A review of the transcript in the case before us reveals no motion to correct errors. Accordingly, this attempted appeal is dismissed.
Arterburn, C. J., Givan and Hunter, JJ., concur.
DeBruler, J., dissents with opinion.