Court Opinion

ID: 4502746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-30 06:17:35.077407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:10:43.302301
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-90,818-01

                      EX PARTE DAVID PAUL NAVARRO, Applicant

              ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
           CAUSE NO. 20140D03126-409-1 IN THE 409TH DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM EL PASO COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of one count of aggravated assault, one count of assault of a family

member, and one count of burglary of a motor vehicle and sentenced to thirty years for the

aggravated assault count and twenty years for the assault and burglary counts, all running

concurrently. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because notice of appeal was

not timely filed. Applicant was sentenced on April 10, 2019. His trial counsel timely filed a motion

for new trial, making the deadline for filing notice of appeal July 9, 2019. According to Applicant,

he advised trial counsel that he wanted to appeal. For reasons not clear from the record, according
                                                                                                        2

to Applicant, appellate counsel was not appointed until August 8, 2019. Appellate counsel filed

notice of appeal along with a motion for extension of time for filing notice of appeal on August 9,

2019. However, because neither were filed within 15 days of the deadline for filing notice of appeal

as required by Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal was dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. Navarro v. State, No. 08-19-00207-CR (Tex. App. — El Paso August 23,

2019) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Axel, 757
S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel1 to

respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

        The trial court shall supplement the record with a copy of the order appointing appellate

counsel in this case. If appellate counsel was not appointed until too late for filing notice of appeal,

the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to why appellate counsel was not

timely appointed. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

        1
         If a defendant decides to appeal his conviction, trial counsel rather than appellate
counsel has the duty to ensure that written notice of appeal is filed with the trial court. Jones, 98
S.W.3d at 703.
                                                                                                       3

Applicant was denied his right to an appeal because trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of

appeal, or because the trial court was advised of Applicant’s desire to have appellate counsel

appointed but did not timely appoint appellate counsel. The trial court may make any other findings

and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 29, 2020
Do not publish