Court Opinion

ID: 9417171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 20:04:54.173671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:00:16.051733
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Milleb
dissenting.
I am of opinion that the National Banking Act makes void every mortgage or other conveyance of land as a security for *630money loaned by the bank at the time of the transaction to whomsoever the conveyance may be made; that the bank is forbidden to accept such security, and it is void in its hands.
The contract to pay the money, and the collateral conveyance for security, are separable contracts, and so far independent that one may stand and the other fall.
In the present case, the money was loaned on the faith of the deed of trust, and that instrument is void in the hands of the bank, but the note, as evidence of the loan of money, is valid against Mrs. Matthews personally. With this latter contract the State court did not interfere. It enjoined proceedings under the deed of trust against the land, and did no more.
Its judgment in that matter ought, in my opinion, to be affirmed.