Court Opinion

ID: 5985230
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 08:34:49.640925+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:37.310281
License: Public Domain

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Putnam County (Reitz, J.), both rendered September 27, 2011, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree under indictment No. 26/08 and perjury in the first degree under indictment No. 19/10, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Chambers, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.