Court Opinion

ID: 9390918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-28 20:06:57.388819+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:38.138301
License: Public Domain

People v Acosta (2023 NY Slip Op 02208)

People v Acosta

2023 NY Slip Op 02208

Decided on April 28, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

173 KA 18-01536

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vMARIA J. ACOSTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

ERIK TEIFKE, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Christopher S. Ciaccio, J.), rendered May 9, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of arson in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15), defendant contends that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Seay, 201 AD3d 1361, 1361-1362 [4th Dept 2022]), we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
Entered: April 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court