Court Opinion

ID: 8536264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 11:06:41.20663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:52:01.524195
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Todd, Jr.,
dissenting.
I dissent. I consider that the testimony of the witness Daniel Ortiz Figueroa is insufficient in law to corroborate the testimony of Alejandro Núñez, the accomplice, in such a manner as to establish satisfactorily that appellant herein was the owner of a boli-pool game. In my opinion, the testimony of Ortiz did not connect the appellant, either clearly or in any other manner, with the operation as owner of a boli-pool game, regardless of the necessary elements to show how such operation is handled, which operation is not proved either.