Court Opinion

ID: 8622260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 09:59:58.681883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:33.326663
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Alexander Ulises Reyes, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal as an aggravated felon and denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and voluntary departure. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law de novo, Narayan v. Ashcroft, 384 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir.2004), and grant the petition for review.
The BIA construed Reyes’s timely-filed appellate brief as a motion to remand, and denied the motion because Reyes did not establish eligibility for relief. This was error because Reyes did not seek to offer *307new evidence, but rather mounted a legal challenge to the IJ’s decision that he was convicted of an aggravated felon, and requested remand as a remedy. See Matter of Coelho, 20 I. & N. Dec. 464, 471 (BIA 1992) (“Where a motion to remand simply articulates the remedy requested by an appeal, we treat it as part of the appeal and do not require it to conform to the standards for consideration of motions.”); see also Narayan, 384 F.3d at 1068 (motion to remand is part of appeal where motion concerns remedy requested by appeal). The BIA should have remanded the case once it concluded that the IJ erred in ruling that Reyes had been convicted of an aggravated felony.
We deny Reyes’s motion for appointment of counsel.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.