Court Opinion

ID: 9391077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-29 17:10:42.76035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:39.080684
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00050-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

FRANCISCO TAYLOR JR. A/K/A
FRANCISCO GOMEZ TAYLOR JR.
A/K/A FRANCISCO GOMEZ TAYLOR
A/K/A FRANK TAYLOR GOMEZ JR.,                                           Appellant,

                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 404th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Silva and Peña
                Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

      On February 6, 2023, appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction

of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon entered in trial court cause number 2021-

DCR-2169. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
       A sentence in this matter was imposed in open court on December 13, 2022. The

judgment of conviction was entered February 6, 2023, and appellant’s attempted notice

of appeal was filed on the same day. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2 (setting forth notice of

appeal deadlines for criminal cases). On February 9, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified

appellant that it appeared the appeal was not timely perfected. See id. Appellant was

advised the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of the notice. On February 14, 2023, appellant was appointed

counsel. On February 15, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s new counsel

that it appeared the appeal was not timely perfected and advised that the appeal would

be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of

the notice. On February 28, 2023, appellant’s counsel filed a letter response that the

appeal was untimely and should be dismissed.

       This Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc);

see Smith v. State, 559 S.W.3d 527, 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); see also TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(b). To appeal the imposition of a sentence, the defendant must file a notice of

appeal “within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed . . . in open court” or “within 90

days . . . if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.” TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2; Rodarte

v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (concluding when appellant

appeals a sentence, time to file notice of appeal runs from date sentence is imposed in

open court—not from date on which subsequent judgment is entered); see Smith, 559

S.W.3d at 531 (“Rule 26.2(a) contemplates two events that can start the appellate clock

                                              2
running. The first is the imposition or suspension of sentence in open court; that event

sets the appellate timetable for an appeal of a conviction and sentence in motion. The

second is the entry of ‘an appealable order’; that event sets the appellate timetable for

the appeal of a specific, appealable order in motion.”) (internal citations omitted).

       Appellant was sentenced in open court on December 13, 2022, and no timely

motion appears in the record to extend appellant’s notice of appeal deadline. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2. Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal filed on February 6, 2023, is untimely,

and absent a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See Smith, 559 S.W.3d at 537; Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;

however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1999).

       Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                CLARISSA SILVA
                                                                Justice

Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the
27th day of April, 2023.

                                             3