Court Opinion

ID: 9632408
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 11:13:55.058836+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:01.714521
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN and METCALF
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
We concur in what is said in the foregoing opinion except with that part treating of Chapter 130, Laws of 1949. It is our view that its provisions require an election ás to a site only when it is proposed to make a change in the location of the high school building. We think it was not contemplated by the legislature that a vote should be taken on a site when the district already has an established site.
We agree that when the question of the location of a site becomes an issue in the district it must be voted on at the same time and in the same manner as the election on the bond issue.