Court Opinion

ID: 2788721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-24 16:04:56.152531+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:07:57.320429
License: Public Domain

People v Goodwin (2015 NY Slip Op 02431)

People v Goodwin

2015 NY Slip Op 02431

Decided on March 24, 2015

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 24, 2015

Tom, J.P., DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels, Clark, JJ.

5777/02 -666

[*1]14616 & The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vCory Goodwin, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Andrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Eric C. Washer of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law, art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Each of the point assessments at issue was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The assessment for being armed with a dangerous instrument was supported by evidence that the victim felt and saw an apparent firearm (see People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 409 [2010]). The evidence supported an assessment for the victim being under the age of 17, regardless of any paperwork discrepancy as to whether she was 15 or 16. Defendant's challenge to the assessment for a history of drug or alcohol abuse was expressly waived, and is without merit in any event.
In addition, the record supports the court's alternative finding that even if defendant's point score was only at level two, a discretionary upward departure was warranted, because the risk assessment instrument did not adequately account for the seriousness of the underlying crime and defendant's overall criminal history.M-666 - People v Cory Goodwin
Motion to strike brief denied.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED:
CLERK