Court Opinion

ID: 8639056
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:50:09.480198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:02.159684
License: Public Domain

The petitioner testified that Daniel McPherson wrongfully demanded and received from him two dollars and forty cents, which the petitioner charges that in doing so he acted illegally, extorsively and oppressively, and prays the court to order a rule on said McPherson to show cause, if any he can, why he should not be removed from his said office of constable. A rule was served on him in accordance with the prayer.
The following was also submitted to the court: The officer had a right to receive one dollar and twenty-five cents for the distrain and seven per cent., which on twelve dollars (the amount of rent due) would be ninety cents, provided the rent was paid within five days from the time the distrain was laid, and the cart hire, which is said to have been twenty-five cents; making the amount, the bailiff (or constable) is entitled to receive, 814.40. The bailiff (or constable) is bound by law to give Hughes (the tenant) the account of said bailiff receipted, and a statement of all the proceedings.
THE COURT
ordered that Daniel McPherson be discharged from the office of- constable unless he rétum to William Hughes $2.76, and pay' the cost of this rule, on or before the 22d of September, 1842.