Court Opinion

ID: 5807271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:39:46.415912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:45.196385
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 23, 1976, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3213, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $60 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted. On the record before us, defendants’ belated effort to characterize the additional $90,000 advanced by plaintiff as a nonrefundable investment rather than a loan, is insufficient to overcome the overwhelming documentary evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, since no genuine triable issues were raised, summary judgment should have been granted. (Cf. Ehrlich v American Moninger Greenhouse Mfg. Corp., 26 NY2d 225.) Settle order on notice. Concur— Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Birns, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.