Court Opinion

ID: 5557475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:43:55.242549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:22.453083
License: Public Domain

McCay, Judge.
The act of 1869, providing that the words “in or by the running of the cars or engines” shall be struck out of section 3339 of the Code, (Irwin’s,) leaves that section very broad. It thus covers “injuries” óf any kind, since it will then read that the action may be' brought in the county where the cause of action originated, when any one has been “injured” in person or property. Is the wrong complained of in this case an “injury” to the person or property of the complainant? If so, the action lies in the county where the cause of action originated. If there be any other proviso, it can only be that the road must run into the county, as provided by the acts of 1853 and 1856.. The argument attempted to be drawn from' the words used by Judge Walker in 35th Georgia, 144, is, as we think, not a fair one. The language is, it is true, a little inaccurate, but it is plain from the whole decision that he only meant that the Code of 1863 did not contain the broad language of the act of 1859. The act of 1869 makes the law fully as broad as that act, and we, for this reason, affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.