Court Opinion

ID: 2962998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:04:43.640587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:38.307747
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

        November 23, 1994       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-1745                                   AZUBUKO E. CHUKWU,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                        CHIEF ADULT PROBATION OFFICER, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]                                 ____________________                                        Before                                  Cyr, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________                                 ____________________            Azubuko E. Chukwu on brief pro se.
            _________________            Scott  Harshbarger,  Attorney  General,  and  Margaret  C.  Parks,
            __________________                            ___________________        Assistant  Attorney  General,  on  brief  for  appellee,  Chief  Adult        Probation Officer.            Richard L. Barry, Jr.,  Middlesex County Sheriff's  Department, on
            _____________________        brief for appellee, Assistant Clerk, Middlesex County Jail.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  The dismissal of appellant's complaint
                      __________            for lack  of federal subject matter  jurisdiction is affirmed
                                                                 ________            for the reasons contained  in the district court's Memorandum            of Decision and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, dated            May 11, 1994.                                         -2-