Court Opinion

ID: 996152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:46:58.874301+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:44.129496
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6338

LLOYD WAYNE WATSON,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-97-837)

Submitted:   August 13, 1998              Decided:   September 2, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Wayne Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lloyd Wayne Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Watson v. Dep’t of Corr. Dir., No. CA-97-837 (E.D. Va. Feb.

27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2