Court Opinion

ID: 1007137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:20:52.393621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.739592
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-8024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ALROY JARVIS LAWRENCE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-90-195, CA-01-401-1)

Submitted:   March 14, 2002                 Decided:   March 25, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alroy Jarvis Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alroy Jarvis Lawrence seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     United States v. Lawrence, Nos. CR-90-195; CA-01-401-1

(M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2