Court Opinion

ID: 8140384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:03:12.352242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:31.668393
License: Public Domain

The CHIEF JUSTICE
delivered the opinion of the court.
Presuming that the officers of the government performed their, duty, there can. be no doubt that the quartermaster at Atlanta forwarded to the officer in charge of military railroad transportation the cotton of the claimant; and that this officer turned, over the cotton to the agent at Nashville, by whom it was forwarded to Cincinnati and sold by the supervising agent there. The presumption in this case is strengthened by the fact that heavy statutory penalties would be incurred by neglect of duty. There is nothing in the case to repel this presumption. If any evidence to this effect exists, *5it must be contained in the books of the Treasury Department, and these are under the control of the defendant.
We think, therefore, that the conclusion of the Court of Claims, that the proceeds of the 73 bales of cotton belonging to the claimant were paid into the treasury, and that the claimant was entitled to judgment, was right.
Judgment affirmed.