Court Opinion

ID: 9954774
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-26 21:01:09.328294+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:08.089494
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)
In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE )
ANTITRUST LITIGATION )
) MDL Docket No. 1869
) Miscellaneous No. 07-0489 (PLF)
This document relates to: )
)
ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CASES )
)
ORDER

In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred to Judge
Beryl Howell, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant BNSF Railway Company’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [Dkt. No. 1030], Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [Dkt. No. 1031], Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [Dkt. No. 1032], and Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company’s Motion for

Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 1033] are denied without prejudice to their being refiled before
Judge Howell.!
SO ORDERED.

Lf

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
United States District Judge

DATE: 3/2: | a+

; The individual cases that make up MDL Docket No. 1869 are Strates Shows, Inc.

v. Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07-1127; Donnelly Commodities, Inc. v.
Association of American Railroads, Civil Action No. 07- 1515; Dust Pro, Inc. v. CSX
Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2061; Zinifex Taylor Chemicals, Inc. v. CSX

Transportation, Inc., Civil Action No. 07-2062; and US Magnesium LLC v. CSX Transportation,
Inc., Civil Action No. 07- 2116.