Court Opinion

ID: 4369625
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-21 16:00:23.940503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:45.410875
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-11219      Document: 00514842664        Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/20/2019

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 18-11219                       FILED
                                 Conference Calendar            February 20, 2019
                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                       Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY PIERRE,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 3:17-CR-473-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Pierre has moved to

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11219    Document: 00514842664    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/20/2019

                                No. 18-11219

withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pierre has not filed
a response.

      We have reviewed the brief and the relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2