Court Opinion

ID: 5512110
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 04:19:39.268374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:11.320807
License: Public Domain

E. Darwin Smith, J.
The head-note states the point upon which the judgment was affirmed. The affirmance was made with the modification that the judgment should be without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to sue at law. The following authorities were cited in the opinion:
Upon the right to enforce such contracts at law, Chappel v. Brockway, 21 Wend. 158; Rose v. Sadgbee, id. 166. As to the power of a court of equity to enforce it, Collins v. Plumb, 16 Ves. 454.

Judgment as modified affirmed.