Court Opinion

ID: 546544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:43.366991
License: Public Domain

911 F.2d 725Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Thomas Lee MAYNARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6569.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 1990.Decided July 24, 1990.Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (C/A No. 90-401-JFM;  CR No. 88-278-JFM)
Thomas Lee Maynard, appellant pro se.
Lisa M. Griffin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Thomas Lee Maynard appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.*   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Maynard, C/A No. 90-401-JFM;  CR No. 88-278-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 17, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 Because his petition attacks the execution of his sentence, we interpret his petition as one under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241