Court Opinion

ID: 8332811
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 21:28:03.599188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:29.868610
License: Public Domain

O’Gorman, J.
—This is a motion on the part of the defendant, who has answered in the action, for security for costs, under section 3268 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This is an action on a written agreement executed in Pennsylvania, and, under the laws of that state, entitled to be regarded as an instrument under seal.
Whether it should be so regarded for the purposes of this action, and whether the action is or is not barred by the statute of limitations, will probably be the main issue to be tried.
The granting of the defendant’s motion is within the discretion of the court, and, in this case, the motion should, in my opinion, be denied. Todd v. Marsily, 7 N. Y. State Rep., 872; Churchman v. Merritt, 15 Civ. Pro. R., 245; Stevenson v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 16 N. Y. State Rep., 787.