Court Opinion

ID: 9958082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-07 07:13:28.851079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:45.228876
License: Public Domain

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed
April 2, 2024.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-24-00058-CR
                               NO. 14-24-00059-CR

                 IN RE BRANDON RAY MORGAN, Relator

                         ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                          WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                             338th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                  Trial Court Cause Nos. 1354996 & 1419351

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On January 24, 2024, relator Brandon Ray Morgan filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.
App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable
Ramona Franklin, presiding judge of the 338th District Court of Harris County, to
rule on his (1) motion to compel production of the complete litigation packet
underlying the testing data; (2) motion for extension of time with brief and exhibit
in support; and (3) Covid-19 motion for extension of time with brief and exhibits
in support.

      Our Court requested the real party in interest to file a response to relator's
petition by March 27, 2024. The State timely responded and provided our Court a
copy of the trial court’s March 20, 2024 order ruling on relator’s pending motions.

      A petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to rule is dismissed as moot
when the trial court rules after the petition for writ of mandamus is filed. See In re
Mem’l Hermann Health Sys, No. 14-24-00138-CV, 2024 WL 859381, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 29, 2024, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)
(dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot when trial court ruled after
petition was filed).

      As such, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                          2