Court Opinion

ID: 1875775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:41:43.8592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:07.780949
License: Public Domain

260 S.W.3d 432 (2008)
Montrell FUTRELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90100.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
August 19, 2008.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Montrell Futrell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).