Court Opinion

ID: 8411947
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-02 19:15:37.109312+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:47:54.501278
License: Public Domain

*1154ORDER
Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time.