Court Opinion

ID: 8030128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:04:35.604094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.620501
License: Public Domain

On July 21,2006, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs with Intent to Distribute (Methamphetamine), a felony.
On February 8, 2007, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Peter Lacney. The state was represented by Geoff Mahar who appeared via videoconference.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive. However, the fine amount is excessive considering the totality of the circumstance.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed but that the fine shall be reduced to $5,000.00, which was previously paid, with the balance eliminated. The other terms and conditions shall remain unchanged.
Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler.