Court Opinion

ID: 1087455
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 00:03:05.038785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:18.370177
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  This appeal involves attorneys’ fees. Defendant-Appellant GEICO General Insurance Company’s (“GEICO”) sole argument on appeal is that if the final judgment entered by the district court is vacated as requested by GEICO in appeal No. 124427, the award of attorneys’ fees to Appellee Richard Jaimes (“Jaimes”) should likewise be vacated. Because our court has affirmed the final judgment in appeal No. 12-14427,
  
   see Jaimes v. GEICO General Insurance Co.,
  
  Nos. 12-14427 & 13-10847, 534 Fed.Appx. 860, 2013 WL 4106364 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2013), we also affirm the district court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to Jaimes in the present appeal (No. 13-11614).
 

  AFFIRMED.