Court Opinion

ID: 6325207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-21 18:00:20.114306+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:46.028317
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10768     Document: 00516246213         Page: 1     Date Filed: 03/21/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                    March 21, 2022
                                  No. 21-10768
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Rhonda Denise Walker,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:20-CR-61-2

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Rhonda Denise Walker has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Walker has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10768     Document: 00516246213          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/21/2022

                                   No. 21-10768

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Walker’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2. Walker’s request for the appointment of counsel to pursue
   relief unrelated to this direct criminal appeal is DENIED.

                                        2