Court Opinion

ID: 3097176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:43:06.070621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:23:55.149880
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued September 25, 2014.

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                           ————————————
                              NO. 01-13-00998-CV
                           ———————————
                       CARLOS WILLIAMS, Appellant
                                        V.
                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 174th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 1352071

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Pursuant to an agreement with the State, appellant, Carlos Williams, pleaded

guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen
years of age.1 The trial court accepted the plea agreement, assessed appellant’s

punishment at confinement for twelve years, and certified that this is a plea-

bargained case and he has no right of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

      In a plea-bargained case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that

were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial or after obtaining the trial

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. Art 44.02 (West 2006);

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing

that the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

      Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record and states that

this is a plea-bargained case and appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State,

154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of

appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain

whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2),

must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for

the appeal.”).

1
      See TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(1)(B), 2(B) (West Supp. 2014).

                                          2
      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all

pending motions as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           3