Court Opinion

ID: 6341010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-16 15:00:42.514655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:16.089360
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-2305     Document: 26    Page: 1    Filed: 05/16/2022

           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                   ______________________

     NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
                  Appellant

                             v.

                SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,
                          Appellee
                   ______________________

                         2021-2305
                   ______________________

     Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Ap-
 peals in Nos. 61673 and 61675, Administrative Judge Lis
 B. Young, Administrative Judge Owen C. Wilson, and Ad-
 ministrative Judge Richard Shackleford.
            -------------------------------------------------

                SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,
                       Appellant

                             v.

     NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
                    Appellee
             ______________________

                         2021-2308
                   ______________________
Case: 21-2305    Document: 26     Page: 2   Filed: 05/16/2022

 2   NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION    v. SECRETARY OF THE
                                                      ARMY

     Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Ap-
 peals in Nos. 61673 and 61675, Administrative Judge Lis
 B. Young, Administrative Judge Owen C. Wilson, and Ad-
 ministrative Judge Richard Shackleford.
                  ______________________

                      ON MOTION
                  ______________________

                        ORDER
    Upon consideration of the Secretary of the Army’s un-
 opposed motion to voluntarily dismiss her cross-appeal,
 Appeal No. 2021-2308, under Rule 42(b) of the Federal
 Rules of Appellate Procedure,
     IT IS ORDERED THAT:
     (1) The motion is granted to the extent that Appeal No.
 2021-2308 is dismissed. The revised official captions are
 reflected above.
    (2) Each party shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No.
 2021-2308.
     (3) The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this or-
 der to the merits panel assigned to this case.
                                     FOR THE COURT

  May 16, 2022                       /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
     Date                            Peter R. Marksteiner
                                     Clerk of Court

 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2021-2308 only):
 May 16, 2022