Court Opinion

ID: 9298492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 08:09:46.445275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:34.236686
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals

                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                                __________________

                                NO. 09-22-00267-CR
                                __________________

                  REGINALD DCHEIN SAMPSON, Appellant

                                          V.

                        THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 435th District Court
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 18-10-14214-CR
__________________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On October 3, 2022, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why he needed additional time for filing the record. The

appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to

proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no

satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                           1
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                PER CURIAM

Submitted on November 29, 2022
Opinion Delivered November 30, 2022
Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

                                       2