Court Opinion

ID: 1029668
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:01:31.687826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:57.462842
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-6434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

THOMAS B. FOSTER,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.     Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00005-GCM-DCK)

Submitted:    July 30, 2009                 Decided:   August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas B. Foster, Appellant Pro Se.         Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Thomas B. Foster appeals the district court’s order

denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence.   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Therefore    we   affirm   for    the   reasons   stated    by   the

district court.   United States v. Foster, No. 3:96-cr-00005-GCM-

DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2009).           We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                    2