Court Opinion

ID: 8108923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:36:32.557737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:44.107124
License: Public Domain

*396Opinion by
Johnson, J.
It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.