Court Opinion

ID: 1007441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:25:37.633466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:06.837954
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 02-6418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CLIFFORD C. DEANS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-99-30002-5, CA-01-813-7)

Submitted:   April 25, 2002                    Decided:   May 8, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifford C. Deans, Appellant Pro Se. Jack C. Frels, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Clifford C. Deans seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Deans, Nos. CR-99-30002-5; CA-01-

813-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2002).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2