Court Opinion

ID: 9382171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-24 21:01:41.253786+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:37.716082
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1370      Doc: 13         Filed: 03/23/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-1370

        NIVILLA ROCKEE CAMPBELL,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        CITY OF SHELBY, NC; RICK HOWELL, in his Individual and Official capacity,
        City Manager for the City of Shelby, North Carolina; JULIE MCMURRAY, in her
        Individual and Official capacity, Director of Energy Services for the City of Shelby,
        North Carolina; SCOTT HUFFSTETLER, in his Individual and Official capacity,
        Natural Gas Supervisor for the City of Shelby, North Carolina,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00629-FDW-DCK)

        Submitted: March 21, 2023                                         Decided: March 23, 2023

        Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Nivilla Rockee Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Bader, Raleigh, North
        Carolina, Patrick Houghton Flanagan, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Charlotte, North
        Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1370         Doc: 13      Filed: 03/23/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Nivilla Rockee Campbell appeals the district court’s order granting summary

        judgment to Defendants on Campbell’s race discrimination and retaliation claims under

        Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Limiting our

        review of the record to the issues raised in Campbell’s informal brief, we find no reversible

        error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

        (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is

        limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

        judgment. Campbell v. City of Shelby, N.C., No. 3:20-cv-00629-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C.

        Mar. 4, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2