Court Opinion

ID: 745126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 21:49:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:36.620940
License: Public Domain

122 F.3d 1075
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Saul PEDRAZA-MURILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50386.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 1997.**Decided Aug. 28, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding
Before:  SCHROEDER, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Saul Pedraza-Murillo appeals his jury trial conviction and the sixty-three month sentence imposed for illegal reentry by a previously deported felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.  His attorney has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Our examination of counsel's brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), disclose no issues for review.

3
Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

4
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3