Court Opinion

ID: 7173806
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:30:01.413574+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:49.326537
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM *
Because the underlying complaint did not allege bodily injury or property damage within the meaning of the Harrison’s commercial general liability policy, we affirm. See Waller v. Truck Ins. Exch., Inc., 11 Cal.4th 1, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 900 P.2d 619, 630 (1995). Scottsdale’s motion for sanctions is denied.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.