Court Opinion

ID: 1023024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:31:47.225588+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:43.882815
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Robert F. Steeves appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint in which he alleged numerous workplace violations by current and former employees of the Food and Drug Administration. The district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Steeves’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Steeves v. United States,
  
  No. 3:05-cv-00043, 2006 WL 3526911 (W.D.Va., Dec. 6, 2006). We deny Steeves’s motion to strike the Appellees’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.