Court Opinion

ID: 6340221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-12 18:00:35.12891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:14.466879
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-50977       Document: 00516316733           Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/12/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                                                              May 12, 2022
                                    No. 21-50977                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                  Summary Calendar                                Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                  Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

   Everardo Villegas,

                                                              Defendant—Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                                No. 2:19-CR-2647-3

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*

          The attorney appointed to represent Everardo Villegas has moved to
   withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
   and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villegas has not filed
   a response.

          *
             Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum-
   stances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-50977    Document: 00516316733          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/12/2022

                                  No. 21-50977

         We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.
   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2