Court Opinion

ID: 1009678
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:59:56.9294+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:09:08.880608
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID M. SCATES,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-98-87, CA-01-750)

Submitted:   January 30, 2003             Decided:   February 5, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se.    Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle
Dalrymple, OFFICE OF THE UNITED       STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Scates has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.         See United States v.

Scates,   Nos.   CR-98-87;   CA-01-750   (E.D.   Va.   Oct.   29,   2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).        We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                               DISMISSED

                                   2