Court Opinion

ID: 8151605
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:33:47.294532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:35.670497
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question which the appellants are entitled to raise. (1) Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. Oshkosh, 187 U. S. 437, 439; Von Hoffman v. Quincy, 4 Wall. 535, 553-554; South Carolina v. Gaillard, 101 U. S. 433, 437-438; Hill v. Merchants’ Ins. Co., 134 U. S. 515, 527; Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122, 200. (2) Columbus & Greenville Ry. v. Miller, 283 U. S. 96, 99-100; Hooker v. Burr, 194 U. S. 415, 418-419; Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304, 309.