Court Opinion

ID: 2739572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-03 04:07:37.733201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:56.490331
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                               FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                         ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:             01-14-00410-CR, 01-14-00411-CR
Style:                    Kathy Jimenez-Black v. The State of Texas
Date motion filed*:       September 11, 2014
Type of motion:           Motion for Immediate Mandate
Party filing motion:      Appellant
Document to be filed:     Mandate

Is appeal accelerated?       No

Ordered that motion is:
       Granted
               If document is to be filed, document due:
          Denied
          Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
          Other: _____________________________________
          Because appellant’s motion for immediate mandate failed to include a certificate
          of conference or to show good cause for expediting the mandate that was
          scheduled to issue on September 26, 2014, this Court could not grant the motion
          immediately. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 18.1(c). Accordingly, because the
          mandate issued on September 26, 2014, appellant’s motion is dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
                   

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 2, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision