Court Opinion

ID: 8624241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:23:32.838179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:36.044252
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gray’s sentence is AFFIRMED.