Court Opinion

ID: 9945210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-27 16:01:51.416869+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:24.723205
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-14261    Document: 37-1     Date Filed: 02/27/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-14261
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       TRENTON RASHAD DANIEL,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Alabama
                 D.C. Docket No. 3:21-cr-00355-ECM-CWB-2
                           ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-14261     Document: 37-1      Date Filed: 02/27/2024    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                22-14261

       Before NEWSOM, ABUDU, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Thomas Goggans, appointed counsel for Trenton Daniel in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
       v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
       entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
       of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
       entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, and Daniel’s convictions and sentences
       are AFFIRMED.