Court Opinion

ID: 2888481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 20:08:46.541083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:28.872396
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-03-0079-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

AUGUST 22, 2003

______________________________

JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 16,336; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ, and BOYD, S.J.
(footnote: 1)
	Appellant brought this appeal from an order of the trial court denying his motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to aid him in his proceeding seeking DNA testing.  On May 29, 2003, this court entered its order abating the appeal and remanding the matter to the trial court for the purpose of determining if appellant was indigent and thus entitled to the furnishing of a clerk’s record and the appointment of an attorney.

We have been advised that the trial court has now found appellant to be indigent and appointed an attorney to represent him on the DNA application.  Thus, the relief for which appellant sought and was initially denied, has now been afforded him.  This appeal has now become moot.

Accordingly, the appeal is now reinstated and because of its mootness, must be, and is hereby, dismissed. 

John T. Boyd

Senior Justice

Do not publish.

FOOTNOTES
1:John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.  Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).