Court Opinion

ID: 2885225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 18:31:44.285291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:59.422321
License: Public Domain

07-01-0046-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 12, 2001

______________________________

JOHN EDWARD JAROCH,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 180TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 859,156; HON. DEBBIE STRICKLIN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. 

John Edward Jaroch (appellant) appeals his conviction for sexual assault of a child.  Through three issues, he contends that 1) his counsel was ineffective, 2) the trial court erred in excluding testimony regarding the victim’s prior sexual relationship and 3) the trial court erred in excluding appellant’s written statement during punishment.  These issues are identical to those raised in John Edward Jaroch v. State, No. 07- 00-0045-CR, pending in this court.  Consequently, we adopt the reasoning and discussion in our opinion issued this day in cause number 07-00-0045-CR and conclude that it sufficiently disposes of the three issues appellant raises at bar.  In doing so, we also overrule appellant’s contentions and affirm the judgment entered below.

                                               				Brian Quinn 

                                                   				   Justice 

 

 

Do not publish.