Court Opinion

ID: 4146967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-22 01:01:05.24536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:50:44.487473
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-40975      Document: 00513883068         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-40975
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS MARTIN MENDOZA-ACEVES,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:15-CR-852-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Martin Mendoza-Aceves
raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria,
831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016)
(No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which
defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2014), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40975   Document: 00513883068     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2017

                                No. 16-40975

Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Id. at 672. Accordingly, the
motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.

                                      2