Court Opinion

ID: 559704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:10:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:07.219998
License: Public Domain

931 F.2d 54Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Nathaniel JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.J. BROOKS, Officer, Eugene Nuth, Warden, Tyrone Haines,Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6527.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 1991.Decided April 24, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge.  (CA-90-2272-H)
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr., appellant pro se.
Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Johnson v. Brooks, CA-90-2272-H (D.Md. Jan. 10, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.