Court Opinion

ID: 7731646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:45:48.519544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:24.875233
License: Public Domain

The petitioner seeks to have this Court direct the Court of Civil Appeals to withdraw its order granting J.F.'s petition for a writ of mandamus.
"A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that requires the showing of: (1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty on the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) the properly invoked jurisdiction of the court." Ex parte McNaughton, 728 So.2d 592, 594 (Ala. 1998).
Having not presented this Court with a copy of all the materials submitted by J.F. *Page 389 
to the Court of Civil Appeals, and having omitted other necessary materials as well, the petitioner has failed to show "a clear legal right . . . to the order sought." Therefore, the petition is due to be, and is, denied.
 WRIT DENIED.
Maddox, Houston, Cook, See, Lyons, Brown, and England, JJ., concur.