Court Opinion

ID: 8623918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:04:33.366764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:35.707010
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Kesheng Zhu appeals from his guilty plea conviction and 33-month sentence for conspiracy to transport individuals in furtherance of prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.