Court Opinion

ID: 1007119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:20:41.618029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.289689
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                No. 02-6030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSEPH GADY,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-96-985, CA-00-641-9-08)

Submitted:     March 14, 2002                 Decided:   March 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Gady, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joseph Gady seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Gady, Nos. CR-96-985; CA-00-

641-9-08 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2