Court Opinion

ID: 3991733
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:51:27.201115+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:18.334055
License: Public Domain

This case is presented upon an affidavit and application of the relators for a writ of prohibition and upon the return of the respondent to an alternative writ. The case involves only one question, which is, may the sureties on a supersedeas bond be proceeded against by an order to show cause, or must they be brought in by summons? If only by summons, the writ applied for must be granted.
We have no statute regulating or controlling the subject. InKalb-Glibert Lumber Co. v. Cram, 60 Wn. 664, 111 P. 1050, in discussing the procedure to recover against sureties on a bond given in an action in equity, upon referring to other authorities including Davis v. Virges, 39 Wn. 256, 81 P. 688, which was a case against sureties on a supersedeas bond, it was said: *Page 394 
"If the question were an open one, we would feel disposed to hold that the sureties might be brought into the original action by any reasonable notice, such as a show cause order; but the question is one of practice only, and we will follow the rule announced in the Davis case, namely, that the parties can only be brought in by summons."
The writ will issue.