Court Opinion

ID: 1005643
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:59:21.222225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:52.983279
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6529

MILTON PARKS,

                                                Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ROBERT SMITH,

                                                 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-00-318-5-H)

Submitted:   August 31, 2001                 Decided:   October 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton Parks, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Milton Parks seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Parks v. Smith, No. CA-00-318-5-H

(E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2001).   We also deny Parks’ motions to appoint

counsel, dismiss an unexhausted claim, amend an unexhausted claim,

and to supplement the record.        We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2