Court Opinion

ID: 699992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:42:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:13.024469
License: Public Domain

60 F.3d 822NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.William SMITH;  Reaheon Getachew;  Unknown Psychiatrist;Roy Clymer;  El-Beshir;  Pappas;  Claudette Michel;Michelle Martin;  Archlie Gee;  Richard Plies, All suedindividually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees,andLIBERSTEIN;  DOCTOR PIKE;  Mamichell Cordett;  RichardPlace, Defendants.
No. 95-6510.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 18, 1995.Decided:  June 29, 1995.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD;  Philip Melton Andrews, Geoffrey Hawthorne Genth, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Holsey v. Smith, No. CA-92-2630-K (D. Md. Mar. 16, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED