Court Opinion

ID: 695846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:28:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:00.121539
License: Public Domain

54 F.3d 774NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Donald Carl HUNT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-7218.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.Decided May 18, 1995.

Donald Carl Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.  Thomas J. Ashcraft, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Hunt, No. CR-91-121 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*
 In light of this disposition, Hunt's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied