Court Opinion

ID: 242434
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:33:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:31.453742
License: Public Domain

245 F.2d 223
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James BALLENTINE, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket 24623.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
May 22, 1957.

James Ballentine, pro se.
Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.

1
As the attorney assigned by us on March 25, 1957 has examined the transcript of the testimony at the trial and given the matter as a whole careful consideration and reports that he can find no merit whatever in the appeal and wishes to be relieved, we accede to his request.

2
Appellant's application for the assignment of new counsel is denied. United States ex rel. Tierney v. Richmond, 2 Cir., 245 F.2d 222.

3
Appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file a brief and appendix pro se is granted and he may file same at any time on or before September 1, 1957.