Court Opinion

ID: 4561023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-28 12:01:42.387138+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:33.207942
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 18-1789V
                                        (not to be published)

    KATHEY PHELPS, as Administrator of
    the ESTATE OF JAMES T. PHELPS,                              Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Deceased,
                                                                Filed: July 28, 2020
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Special Processing Unit                 (SPU);
                                                                Attorney’s Fees and Costs
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                         Respondent.

William E. Cochran, Jr., Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN , for
Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

       On November 20, 2018, Kathey Phelps, as Administrator of the Estate of James
T. Phelps, Deceased, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner
alleges that her husband Mr. Phelps suffered GBS which resulted in his death after
receiving the influenza vaccination on October 4, 2017. (Petition at 1, ¶¶ 3, 12). On May

1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2
  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
26, 2020, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the
parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 31).

       Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated June 19,
2020 (ECF No. 35), requesting a total award of $43,240.19 (representing $38,976.60 in
fees and $4,263.59 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9, Petitioner filed a
signed statement indicating that Petitioner did incurred out-of-pocket expenses in the
amount of $3,017.86. (ECF No. 35-3). Respondent reacted to the motion on June 22,
2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney
fees and costs are met in this case and defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the
amount to be awarded. Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

       I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
hours or rates.

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. §
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I
award a total of $46,258.05 as follows:

            •   A lump sum of $43,240.19, representing reimbursement for
                attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to
                Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel and

           •    A lump sum of $3,017.86, representing reimbursement for petitioner’s
                costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

      In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of
the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                      Brian H. Corcoran
                                                      Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice
renouncing their right to seek review.
                                                 2