Court Opinion

ID: 2927090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:46:19.62285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:45.610859
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-94-00346-CV

 
COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
FRANK D. YTURRIA,	Relator,

v.

HON. J. MANUEL BAÑALES, ET AL.,	Respondents.
_____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	This petition for writ of mandamus was abated by this Court on June 2, 1994, due
to the mandamus action being premature.  The original proceeding was abated until such
time as the superseded partition judgment was finally determined through the normal
course of appeal. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this original
proceeding. 
	On March 12, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the
status of the original proceeding and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the original
proceeding or a motion to dismiss the original proceeding.  The trial court responded to the
order by informing this Court that the case was settled on all issues and recommended that
the pending petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed.  Accordingly, we reinstate and
dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b).  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

								PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 23rd day of April, 2009.