Court Opinion

ID: 7556303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:50:29.746379+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:06.874676
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.