Court Opinion

ID: 3217535
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-28 15:21:07.171011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:40:35.851741
License: Public Domain

Order filed June 23, 2016

                                    In The

        Eleventh Court of Appeals
                                  ___________

                             No. 11-15-00305-CR
                                  ___________

                     JOANNA HERNANDEZ, Appellant
                                       V.
                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                     On Appeal from the 358th District Court
                              Ector County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. D-44,330

                                   ORDER
      Joanna Hernandez, Appellant, pleaded not guilty to three counts of
endangering a child. In all three counts, the jury convicted her of the offense,
assessed her punishment at confinement for two years in a state jail facility, and
recommended that her sentence be suspended. The trial court accepted the jury’s
recommendation and placed Appellant on community supervision for five years.
      Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The
motion is supported by a brief in which counsel asserts that he has professionally
and conscientiously examined the record and applicable law and that he has
concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy
of the brief and advised Appellant of her right to review the record and file a response
to counsel’s brief. Appellant has not filed a response. It appears that court-appointed
counsel has attempted to comply with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008);
Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d
807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and
Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).
      Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have
independently reviewed the record, and we disagree with court-appointed counsel’s
conclusion that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We are of the opinion that
there are arguable grounds for an appeal. In this regard, we note that the offense for
which Appellant was convicted requires that the danger to the children be
“imminent.” TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.041(c) (West 2011) (“A person commits
an offense if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence, by
act or omission, engages in conduct that places a child younger than 15 years in
imminent danger of death, bodily injury, or physical or mental impairment.”); see
Garcia v. State, 367 S.W.3d 683, 688–89 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Moody v. State,
No. 01-03-00685-CR, 2004 WL 1472216, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
July 1, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Millslagle v. State,
81 S.W.3d 895, 898 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, pet. ref’d); Elder v. State, 993 S.W.2d
229, 230 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.).
      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate this proceeding,
and remand the case to the trial court for the appointment of new appellate counsel.
See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We direct
                                           2
the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent Appellant on appeal. The trial
court shall furnish the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of
new counsel in its order appointing new counsel. The order shall be included in a
supplemental clerk’s record, which shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or
before July 8, 2016. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court thirty days from
the date of the trial court’s appointment of new counsel. All other appellate
deadlines shall be in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
      The motion to withdraw is granted; the appeal is abated; and the cause is
remanded to the trial court in accordance with this order.

                                                      PER CURIAM

June 23, 2016
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

                                           3