Court Opinion

ID: 9955699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-29 00:00:37.591536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:16.321937
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10272            Document: 93-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/28/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                   ____________                                           FILED
                                                                                    March 28, 2024
                                     No. 23-10272                                    Lyle W. Cayce
                                   ____________                                           Clerk

United States of America,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Daniel Marquez Hernandez,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:17-CR-316-1
                   ______________________________

Before Jolly, Smith, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Marquez Hernandez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011), as well as a supplemental Anders brief regarding the Supreme
Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111
(2022). Marquez Hernandez has filed a response to both brief, and he alleges

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10272       Document: 93-1       Page: 2    Date Filed: 03/28/2024

                                 No. 23-10272

that the district court made a mathematical error in calculating his sentence.
This argument is without merit, because the record does not reflect a
sentencing error and Marquez Hernandez’s appeal waiver makes no
exception for erroneous guidelines assessments.         We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs, Marquez Hernandez’s responses, and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2