Court Opinion

ID: 5650614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 22:47:04.842226+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:34.167662
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment ren-
dered on writ of certiorari. The only record on file is in the form of a typewritten transcript. Appellant has not complied with section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must “print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.” The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient, in that no part of the record has been printed therein.
On the authority of Stewart v. Andrews, 35 Cal. App. 230, [169 Pac. 397]; Jones v. American Potash Co., 35 Cal. App. 128, [169 Pac. 397]; Hepler v. Wright, 35 Cal. App. 567, [170 Pac. 667], and other cases cited in those decisions, the judgment is affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on April 4, 1918.