Court Opinion

ID: 802569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-19 17:24:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:45.308418
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-10585     Document: 00511891184         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/19/2012

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 19, 2012
                                     No. 11-10585
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TOMMY CRENSHAW,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:10-CR-335-1

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Tommy Crenshaw has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Crenshaw has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Crenshaw’s response.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.