Court Opinion

ID: 9670532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:22:05.759012+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:51:21.491280
License: Public Domain

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.
(concurring). I agree with the majority that the criminal escape prosecution is not barred under double jeopardy. I do not, however, find the majority’s intent analysis persuasive or applicable in determining the question of multiple punishment under the multiple-punishment prohibition. See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 575 (1979) (Stevens, J., dissenting); Note, A Definition of Punishment for Implementing the Double Jeopardy Clause’s Multiple-Punishment Prohibition, 90 Yale L.J. 632, 642-48 (1981).