Court Opinion

ID: 2864182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:59:09.640879+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:37.869802
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00151-CR

Leslie Blaylark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 0996458, HONORABLE CHARLES F. CAMPBELL, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

Leslie Blaylark appeals from judgments of conviction for aggravated sexual assault
and burglary of a habitation.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.021, 30.02 (West Supp. 2001). 
The jury assessed punishment for the aggravated sexual assault at imprisonment for life, and for
the burglary at imprisonment for fifty years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d
137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeal.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

				                                                                       
 						Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed:   April 12, 2001

Do Not Publish