Court Opinion

ID: 2864426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:03:22.723091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:15.499685
License: Public Domain

<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" link="#0000ff" vlink="#551a8b" alink="#ff0000" bgcolor="#c0c0c0">

<p><font size="+1"><strong> <center>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</strong></font></center>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><hr align="center" width="26%">

<strong><center>NO. 03-<a name="1">00-775</a>-<a name="2"></a>CV</center>
</strong>

<p><hr align="center" width="26%">

<strong><center><a name="4">In re Alfred D. Pruske, Sr.</a></center>
</strong>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><strong><hr size="3">

<center>ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY</center>
</strong>

<p><strong><hr size="3">

PER CURIAM</strong>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p>		The Court considered Relator's Motion for Review and Reconsider (sic) or Motion
for Writ of Mandamus as a petition for writ of mandamus.  The petition is denied.  Tex. R. App.
P. 52.8(a).  

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p>Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p>Filed:   January 17, 2001

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p>Do Not Publish

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
</body>
</html>