Court Opinion

ID: 3905677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:35:02.768973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:59:07.550520
License: Public Domain

The first three items of expense mentioned in the third paragraph of the court's conclusions of law were not occasioned by unavoidable casualties within the meaning of the lease contract. Tays v. Ecker,6 Tex. Civ. App. 188, 24 S.W. 954; Welles v. Castles, 3 Gray, (Mass.) 323. The tenant was therefore liable therefor.
As to the remaining item mentioned in said paragraph, the evidence supports the finding that it was not due to ordinary wear and tear.
Affirmed.
 *Page 192