Court Opinion

ID: 8374714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-20 07:11:52.041395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:23.377034
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                 EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                      EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                   §                No. 08-22-00185-CR
 EX PARTE:
                                                   §                  Appeal from the
 BRANDON BERRY,
                                                   §            409th Judicial District Court
                                Appellant.
                                                   §              of El Paso County, Texas

                                                   §                (TC#20150D00501)

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

        Appellant, Brandon Berry, pro se, attempts to appeal the denial of his pre-trial application

for writ of habeas corpus heard by the trial court on September 20, 2022. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction.

        On September 30, 2022, upon receipt of Appellant’s notice of appeal, the Clerk of this

Court issued a letter informing the parties no appealable order was found. Further, the letter gave

notice of our intent to dismiss in ten days for lack of jurisdiction unless any party could show

grounds for continuing the appeal. On October 12, 2022, Appellant filed a response, asserting that

the trial court had verbally denied his pre-trial habeas writ application. Appellant does not provide

the purportedly appealed-from order, nor does he assert in his response that a written order denying
the pre-trial writ application has been entered. Appellant nonetheless insists we have jurisdiction

in this case.

        A pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus must be denied with a written order to

properly invoke our jurisdiction. State v. Wachtendorf, 475 S.W.3d 895, 903-04 (Tex.Crim.App.

2015). When, as here, there is no written order from which to appeal, the court of appeals lacks

jurisdiction over the appeal. See State v. Sanavongxay, 407 S.W.3d 252, 258-259 (Tex.Crim.App.

2012) (concluding that lack of written order leaves court of appeals without jurisdiction over

appeal); Nikrasch v. State, 698 S.W.2d 443, 450 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1985, no pet.) (court of appeals

has no jurisdiction over appeal absent written judgment or order).

        Here, by Appellant’s own admission, there is no written order denying Appellant’s habeas

application but merely a verbal pronouncement of denial by the trial court. Accordingly, we

dismiss Appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Wachtendorf, 475 S.W.3d at 903-04;

Sanavongxay, 407 S.W.3d at 258; Payne v. State, No. 12-17-00143-CR, 2017 WL 2570829, at *1

(Tex.App.--Tyler, June 14, 2017 no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication)

(dismissing appeal from pretrial habeas application for want of jurisdiction absent written order);

Walton v. State, No. 02-18-00396-CR, No. 02-18-00397-CR, No. 02-18-00398-CR, 2018 WL

6424242, at *1 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth Dec. 6, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not

designated for publication) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because appellate court had

not received “a written order from the trial court—a prerequisite to appealability”); Ex parte Wiley,

949 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). All pending motions are denied as moot.

                                                 2
                                             JEFF ALLEY, Justice

October 19, 2022

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

                                                  3