Court Opinion

ID: 4025607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-16 22:09:39.914083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:05.083801
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSHUA A MASTERS,

             Appellant,

 v.                                                     Case No. 5D16-1580

STATE OF FLORIDA,

             Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 5, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Putnam County,
Patti A. Christensen, Judge.

Joshua A. Masters, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

      Joshua A. Masters appeals the order denying his rule 3.850 motion for

postconviction relief, which the trial court denied as untimely. We reverse.

      On January 13, 2012, Masters pled no contest to the charge of home invasion

robbery with a deadly weapon. On February 7, 2012, the trial court sentenced him to

twenty-five years in prison. Masters appealed and this Court affirmed. Masters v. State,

107 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). The mandate issued on February 22, 2013.
       In 2013, Masters filed his first rule 3.850 motion. However, before the trial court

ruled on the motion, he sought to dismiss it, which the trial court granted without prejudice

to file another rule 3.850 motion within the two-year time limit. Masters filed the current

motion pursuant to the mailbox rule on January 5, 2015. The court denied the motion as

untimely. This was incorrect as the motion was filed forty-eight days prior to the expiration

of the two-year deadline. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b); Beaty v. State, 701 So. 2d 856,

857 (Fla. 1997) (holding two-year period for filing rule 3.850 motion begins to run upon

issuance of direct appeal mandate).

       We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider Masters’s rule 3.850 motion,

timely filed pursuant to the mailbox rule on January 5, 2015, within two years of the

February 22, 2013, direct appeal mandate.

       REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

                                             2