Court Opinion

ID: 5616456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:19:33.956863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:16.021816
License: Public Domain

Luke, J.
The grounds of the motion for a new trial which have the approval of the trial judge show no reversible error. The evidence amply *770authorized the conviction; and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Decided October 7, 1924.
H. G. Rawls, House & Goree, for plaintiff in error.
P. D. Rich, solicitor, Jesse A. Dralce, P. Z. Geer, contra.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.