Court Opinion

ID: 2937089
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 17:47:54.554508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:14.855403
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                             OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,586-01

                         EX PARTE TERRY WAYNE WILLIS, Applicant

                    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                    CAUSE NO. 65359-C IN THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT
                                FROM POTTER COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance in a drug-free zone and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Seventh

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Willis v. State, No. 07-13-00417-CR (Tex. App. —

Amarillo, August 12, 2014)(not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

        1
            This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
                                                                                                         2

because counsel failed to perform an independent investigation, failed to consult with Applicant

prior to trial, failed to file any pre-trial motions, failed to raise the issue of Applicant’s competency

to stand trial, failed to make appropriate challenges during voir dire, failed to object to evidence of

extraneous unadjudicated offenses, and failed to present any witnesses on Applicant’s behalf.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Specifically, trial counsel shall describe the investigation and trial preparation he conducted in this

case. Trial counsel shall state whether he consulted with Applicant prior to trial, and whether he

discussed options and strategy with Applicant. Trial counsel shall state whether he was aware of

evidence suggesting that Applicant might not be competent to stand trial, and if so, whether he

requested a competency evaluation. Trial counsel shall state whether there were any issues

pertaining to the search and seizure in this case, and if so, whether he considered filing a motion to

suppress on this basis. Trial counsel shall state whether he requested or received notice of the State’s

intent to introduce extraneous offense evidence in this case. Trial counsel shall state whether or not

Applicant provided him with the names of any potential witnesses, and if so, whether those witnesses

were called to testify on Applicant’s behalf.

        The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In

the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
                                                                                                      3

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 26, 2015
Do not publish