Court Opinion

ID: 8677075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:45:32.333169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.825933
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Allen Wayne Poston appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion seeking relief from the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * action for failure to particularize and to *473state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poston v. Kane, No. 1:13-cv-00365-JCC-IDD (E.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).