Court Opinion

ID: 3007724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-07 15:04:47.161542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:20.914491
License: Public Domain

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1404-CR-286
 

  Aadil Ashfaque appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss charges of dealing in and possession of a synthetic drug, namely XLR11 [ (l-(5-fluoropen-tyl)indol-3-yI)-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclo-propyl)methanone]. For the reasons set forth in our companion decision of
  
   Tiplick v. State,
  
  also issued today, we find no constitutional or statutory infirmity to these charges, but nevertheless dismiss them due to the inadequacy of the charging information, and remand to the trial court for all other proceedings consistent with that opinion.
 

  RUSH, C.J., and DICKSON, RUCKER, and DAVID, JJ., concur.