Court Opinion

ID: 18765
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:18:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:47.183764
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-50215
                         Conference Calendar

ALTON JEROME MOORE,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Defendant-Appellee.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. W-99-CV-13
                          --------------------

                            August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Federal prisoner Alton Jerome Moore challenges the district

court’s dismissal of his lawsuit seeking damages from the U.S.

for alleged wrongs and omissions surrounding his arrest for

possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute.          The

district court erred in construing the complaint as a Bivens**

action since the suit was brought against only the United States

for its wrongful acts and omissions, not against any named

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
     **
          Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
                             No. 99-50215
                                  -2-

individual federal agents.     See Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh, 11 F.3d
1284, 1295 (5th Cir. 1994) (Bivens is the vehicle by which the

victim of a constitutional violation by a federal agent may

recover damages against the federal agent in federal court).

      Nevertheless, dismissal of the complaint was appropriate.

As the district court determined, because resolution of this

action would necessarily impact the validity of Moore's

conviction and sentence, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994),

mandates dismissal since no cause of action accrues unless and

until Moore can show that he has obtained some measure of success

through postconviction proceedings.

     AFFIRMED.