Court Opinion

ID: 4680927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-26 07:20:31.89895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:39.736663
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-90,574-01

                            EX PARTE JEFF MARTINEZ, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 1454459-A IN THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT
                               FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Applicant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07.

        Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to an appeal because

counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. Based on the record, the trial court has found that

counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal.

        Relief is granted. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State,

98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction

in cause number 145445901010 from the 351ST District Court of Harris County. Within ten days
                                                                                                      2

from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him on direct appeal. All deadlines shall be calculated as if Applicant was sentenced on

the date of this Court’s mandate. Should Applicant decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate. To the extent that

Applicant raised claims in this writ application challenging the validity of his conviction or sentence,

those claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.3d 469, 472–73 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

        Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: April 21, 2021
Do not publish