Court Opinion

ID: 549228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:07:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:00.668655
License: Public Domain

915 F.2d 1564Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Nathan J. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jerry M. NEAL, Dr., Rhett Jackson, Lee R. Cathcart, MarionBeasley, Dr. Willie Givens, J.P. Hodges, RayRossi, Grady Wallace, Michael J.Cavanaugh, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6320.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 1990.Decided Oct. 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-89-2059)
Nathan J. Jones, appellant pro se.
Carl Norman Lundberg, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Service, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Nathan J. Jones appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Jones v. Neal, CA-89-2059 (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.