Court Opinion

ID: 303876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:50:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:42.985396
License: Public Domain

461 F.2d 775
James Henry EISENHARDT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 30311.
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
April 12, 1972.

James H. Eisenhardt, pro se.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Allen I. Hirsch, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Charles J. Carroll, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for expeditious reconsideration in light of the principles announced in Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 626 [April 12, 1972]; Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S. Ct. 1532, 23 L. Ed. 2d 57; and Harrington v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 1190.1

2
Vacated and remanded.

1
 It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily.  See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158