Court Opinion

ID: 547880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:07:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:25.996622
License: Public Domain

914 F.2d 247Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Earl M. AUSTIN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Michael E. BUMGARNER, Attorney General of the State of NorthCarolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-7261.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 1990.Decided Sept. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.  N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-699-G)
Earl M. Austin, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Earl M. Austin seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Austin v. Bumgarner, C/A No. 88-699-G (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.