Court Opinion

ID: 1008108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:32.679029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:56.525772
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6839

ERNEST JUNIOR THAMES,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DEAN WALKER, Superintendent,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-658-1)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Junior Thames, Appellant Pro Se.     Sandra Wallace-Smith,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ernest Junior Thames seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001).    We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.    Thames v. Walker, No. CA-01-

658-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2002).        We grant Thames’ motion to

supplement the record, but deny his motions for appointment of

counsel and for transcripts at government expense.      We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                2