Court Opinion

ID: 4061112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 20:02:39.762817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:19.128621
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 25, 2015

                                             In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                          Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      No. 05-13-01052-CR

                          RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant

                                                V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                      On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
                                   Dallas County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. F12-11185-M

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                          Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown
                                   Opinion by Justice Bridges

       Ronald Terrell Floyd pleaded guilty before a jury to felony driving while intoxicated.

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2014). After finding appellant

guilty, the jury assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney

filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a

professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to

advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro
se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

       We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal.

       We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
131052F.U05
 
                                                      /David L. Bridges/
                                                      DAVID L. BRIDGES
                                                      JUSTICE
 

                                               ‐2‐ 

 
                               Court of Appeals
                        Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

                                      JUDGMENT

RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant                    Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
                                                   Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-13-01052-CR       V.                        F12-11185-M).
                                                   Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                       Justices Fillmore and Brown participating.

      Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

      Judgment entered February 25, 2015.

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

                                            ‐3‐