Court Opinion

ID: 5297889
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 02:54:49.796179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:02.011113
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
On this record plaintiffs could not have the judgment they seek against defendant bank, in the absence of its depositor as a party. The denial of the motion to bring in the depositor was the result of plaintiffs’ insistence that the depositor be kept out of the action; and it does not imply that plaintiffs *838can take the funds without any adjudication against the depositor. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.