Court Opinion

ID: 9841336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-22 00:00:34.705393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:58.320533
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-30057         Document: 00516904538             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/21/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-30057
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                             September 21, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Demetrius Pearson,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Louisiana
                                USDC No. 2:22-CR-18-4
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Demetrius Pearson has moved to
   withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
   and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pearson has not filed
   a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the
   record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-30057     Document: 00516904538          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/21/2023

                                   No. 23-30057

         We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw
   is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2