Court Opinion

ID: 9642513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 18:01:17.896308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:57.552103
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40036        Document: 00516867192             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/22/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                     ____________                                     FILED
                                                                                August 22, 2023
                                      No. 23-40036                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                    Summary Calendar                                  Clerk
                                    ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Antonio Sanchez-Vega,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:18-CR-1583-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Engelhardt, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Sanchez-Vega has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Vega has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40036    Document: 00516867192         Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/22/2023

                                 No. 23-40036

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2