Court Opinion

ID: 997248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:53:36.977309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:04.613990
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7119

NATHANIEL JOHNSON,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RANDOLPH COUNTY CORRECTION,

                                                 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-1202-1)

Submitted:   November 19, 1998              Decided:   December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Johnson v. Randolph County Correction, No. CA-97-1202-1, (M.D.N.C.

July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2