Court Opinion

ID: 5655939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 23:53:04.901479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:48.246135
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
On this petition for rehearing it is urged that an appeal from the order confirming sale would not have permitted petitioners to secure a review of their motion, made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to amend the order confirming sale by striking out the provision relating to the realtor’s commission. Even if it be assumed that the nonappealable order here involved may be reviewed on certiorari, the action of the trial court cannot be disturbed. This motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. It had before it the documents prepared by petitioners’ attorney setting forth the facts, the subsequently filed affidavit and the evidence. We cannot say, as a matter of law, that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion. It had evidence before it that sustains its position.
Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 6,1950.