Court Opinion

ID: 9794946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 03:14:47.513459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:29.688930
License: Public Domain

SLOAN, J.,
dissenting.
It seems clear in this case that defendant was pressed by interrogation after he had asked for an attorney and after he had said he did not want to talk. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the dissents of Justice Denecke in State v. Atherton, 1966, 242 Or 621, 629, 410 P2d 208, and in State v. Rosenburger, *3851966, 242 Or 376, 380, 409 P2d 684, and in Ms specially concurring opinion in State v. Beaver, 1967, 248 Or 101, 432 P2d 509, I think the confession was inadmissible and the case should be reversed.
Denecke, J., joins in this dissent.