Court Opinion

ID: 1003739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:30:50.462546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:28.180694
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Timothy J. Martin, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
   
   *124
   
  the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
  
   *
  
  Accordingly, we deny Martin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Martin v. Goodman,
  
  No. CA-99-3159-AW (D.Md. Aug. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   The district court entered its order granting summaiy judgment for Defendants prior to the expiration of the time Martin was given to file a reply to the Defendants' supplement to the motion. However, because Martin subsequently filed his response and the district court thoroughly reviewed it, any error was harmless.
   
    See
   
   Fed.R.Civ.P. 61.