Court Opinion

ID: 9853216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:44:36.746547+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:42.927102
License: Public Domain

Benham, Justice,
concurring.
As I did in Hall v. State, 262 Ga. 596 (422 SE2d 533) (1992), I write separately to point out that while there is some evidence to support appellant’s allegation of selective prosecution, that evidence is insufficient under both the intentional discrimination standard adopted by this court in State v. Causey, 246 Ga. 735 (2) (273 SE2d 6) (1980), and the disparate treatment standard utilized in State v. Russell, All NW2d 886 (Minn. 1991). Accordingly, I join the majority in affirming the trial court’s judgment.