Court Opinion

ID: 9403402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-21 00:00:31.872488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:06.673240
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11153         Document: 00516793518             Page: 1      Date Filed: 06/20/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11153
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                  June 20, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Rohnrico Armand Birtfield,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:21-CR-272-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rohnrico
   Armand Birtfield has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Birtfield has not filed a response. We
   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-11153     Document: 00516793518          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/20/2023

                                   No. 22-11153

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                            2