Court Opinion

ID: 5706655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:48:05.626896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:25.903175
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered on or about December 8, 2005, which denied *261plaintiffs motion to require that defendant West 129th Street Realty Co. and its indemnitor, 408-412 West 129th Street Associates, be jointly represented at trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Given the circumstances of this personal injury arising from an assault by an intruder in an apartment building, where the sale of the building closed 90 minutes later and plaintiff sued, among others, both the seller and the purchaser, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in permitting both entities to continue to be represented by separate counsel of their choice at trial despite both the dismissal of the complaint against the purchaser on its motion for summary judgment and this Court’s prior ruling (22 AD3d 274 [2005]) granting the seller summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the purchaser, which determination is still subject to possible further review upon entry of a final judgment after trial. Indeed, if the trial court had granted plaintiffs motion, to which the seller did not object, the purchaser effectively would have been deprived of its right to conflict-free counsel of its choice (cf. Chemprene, Inc. v X-Tyal Intl. Corp., 55 NY2d 900 [1982], modfg, on partial dissent of Lazer, J., 78 AD2d 668 [1980]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Williams, McGuire, JJ.