Court Opinion

ID: 9895140
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-04 21:00:37.794919+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:11.804462
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6125      Doc: 8         Filed: 11/03/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6125

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      v.

        JAMES LARRY BELLAMY,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-BO-2)

        Submitted: October 31, 2023                                  Decided: November 3, 2023

        Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        James Larry Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6125      Doc: 8        Filed: 11/03/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              James Larry Bellamy appeals from the district court’s order granting his motion for

        compassionate release. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-

        00049-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

              *
                Although the district court granted Bellamy’s motion in part and reduced his
        sentence, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce his sentence to the full extent
        he requested.

                                                    2