Court Opinion

ID: 8609506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 06:57:44.697937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.415044
License: Public Domain

*625MEMORANDUM**
Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2).
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
Ml other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. To the extent petitioner requests a stay of voluntary departure, this court lacks jurisdiction to grant that request. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.