Court Opinion

ID: 9584269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:46:08.858034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:07:20.229794
License: Public Domain

Pannell, Judge,
dissenting. The trial judge granted a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action upon a casualty insurance policy. The plaintiff-appellant appealed to this court. The brief of the appellant consists of two pages containing a short statement of fact relating to the pleadings and the time of the various motions, etc. Next appears the "Statement of Issue” as follows: "The issue to be determined in this case is whether the trial judge erred in granting the Motion for Summary Judgment under allegations of complaint considered in light of appellant’s response in opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment.” *672The- brief contains no argument or citations of authority- or any discussion of the facts as shown by the evidence produced upon the summary judgment hearing. The only argument of any kind or character is contained in appellant’s enumeration of errors filed -separately from his brief (as required by our rules), but the enumeration of errors was-not-repeated or shown in his brief, as-required by our rules. Under these circumstances, the enumeration of errors should be considered as abandoned, and the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. Edwards v. Johnson, 122 Ga. App. 462 (1) (177 SE2d 490).
I am authorized to state that Judge Quillian concurs in this dissent.