Court Opinion

ID: 693742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:21:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:43.964784
License: Public Domain

52 F.3d 320NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rayford L. BURKE, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Michael GRANT;  Howard Brown;  Ken Shawver;  Robert Warsaw;Ralph Bently, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7236.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 1995.Decided April 20, 1995.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.
Edmund L. Gaines, HOMESLEY, JONES, GAINES & FIELDS, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Burke v. Grant, No. CA-92-39-5-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED