Court Opinion

ID: 9419907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:52:04.81431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:19.691653
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Rutledge,
concurring.
I concur in the opinion and judgment of the Court. But I desire to add that, in the due process phase of the case, I find no basis for conclusion that any of the transactions included in the measure of the tax was so lacking in substantial fact connections with Ohio as to preclude the state’s use of them, cf. McLeod v. Dilworth Co., 322 U. S. 327, dissenting opinion at 352-357, if indeed a limitation of this sort were material to an apportionment found on the whole to be fairly made. For the rest, as the Court holds, the apportionment clearly is valid.