Court Opinion

ID: 9830345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:08:03.635067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:19.897671
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing;
The judgment in this ease as entered does not fix the boundary line between the parties. It is believed that it should be reformed so as to do so in correct disposition of the issues. The judgment should establish, and it is so ordered, the beginning corner of Mrs. D. D. Brewer’s land at the arrowhead in the concrete walk on the east side of block 12, thence running west between the north wall of Mrs. Brewer’s hotel and the row of cedar trees, and parallel with the north and south lines of block 12 to the west boundary line of block 12. Mrs. Brewer is entitled to only 75 feet frontage on Walnut or Depot street, beginning at the arrowhead, and running south, and to 200 feet running back west. It was not disputed that Mrs. Brewer was entitled to 75. feet fronting on Walnut street, and on Cedar street running back 200 feet. She purchased 75 by 200 feet, and she did not claim more land by estoppel or by limitation. The appellant was entitled to a judgment, and it is here directed to be entered to all the land except the particular land conveyed to Mrs. Brewer, with her beginning corner fixed as decreed. The judgment here entered is merely in conformity with the jury verdict and the pleadings.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.