Court Opinion

ID: 9867769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 17:01:08.555896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:19:16.394510
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12750    Document: 6-1      Date Filed: 09/26/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                   [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                                No. 23-12750
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      RODNEY BERRY,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      JOHN / JANE DOE,
      Warden, FCC Coleman Medium, et al.,

                                                            Defendants,

      ALLISON MURPHY,
      Nurse, in her Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
      RICHARD LI,
      Primary Care Provider, in his Individual
USCA11 Case: 23-12750      Document: 6-1     Date Filed: 09/26/2023      Page: 2 of 3

      2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-12750

      and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      K. GOMEZ,
      Clinical Director, in his Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      L. MIRANDA,
      Family Nurse Practioner (FNP), in his Individual
      and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      MARI LASSALLE,
      RN, in her Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,

                                                     Defendants-Appellees.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 5:21-cv-00351-BJD-PRL
                          ____________________

      Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Rodney Berry, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals
      from the district court’s order and judgment in favor of five out of
      six named defendants. The order and judgment are not final and
      appealable, however, because the district court has not yet resolved
      the rights and liabilities of the United States and did not certify its
      judgment for immediate appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(b);
USCA11 Case: 23-12750     Document: 6-1     Date Filed: 09/26/2023     Page: 3 of 3

      23-12750               Opinion of the Court                        3

      Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979,
      986 (11th Cir. 2022); Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d
      1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.