Court Opinion

ID: 8440223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:51:54.57527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:48.098236
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cannon’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cannon v. Longo, No. JFM-10-1089, 2011 WL 709847 (D.Md. Feb. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.