Court Opinion

ID: 8777211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 13:06:11.686959+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:38.376793
License: Public Domain

SMITH McPHERSON, District Judge.
This case is by a bill in equity reciting letters patent 559,642 with reference to corrugated culverts, under which the rights to the state of Missouri by due course of conveyances were assigned to complainants, setting forth that the respondent is infringing complainant’s rights, and for general equitable relief. To this complaint defendant has filed a demurrer, to the effect that the patent on its face is a nullity.
My views are that the question is doubtful, my first impression having been that the patent was not valid; but upon reflection I cannot say but that the matter is involved in doubt. And the rule is in cases of doubt that the complainant must be given an opportunity by proof to support and justify the action of the Patent Office in issuing the patent. It cannot now be said from the face of the complaint that in no event can the patent be sustained. The case is not free from doubt. And this court cannot say, from judicial notice as to these matters, that it is the common knowledge of all that it is not a new invention, and that it is not novel, or that it is not of utility.
Therefore the demurrer will be overruled, and the respondent required to answer.