Court Opinion

ID: 2691898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:13:32.088814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:10:19.316960
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Bankhead, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143, 2009-Ohio-4303.]

           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BANKHEAD, APPELLANT.
       [Cite as State v. Bankhead, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143, 2009-Ohio-4303.]
Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, and
        appellant discharged from postrelease control.
   (No. 2007-0818 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided September 1, 2009.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-060480,
                                    2007-Ohio-1314.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St. 3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254.
Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed
serving his prison sentence and, pursuant to State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St. 3d 94,
2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing.
        MOYER,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG       STRATTON,   O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                              ______________________
        Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M.
Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant.
                              ______________________