Court Opinion

ID: 9826060
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 15:18:19.340813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:49.794857
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Jones.

I dissent.

1 The magistrate clearly had jurisdiction of the action for damages and the judgment of the magistrate should be affirmed to the extent of $21.23. If this should result in depriving plaintiff of the right to sue for and recover penalty in Newberry county, plaintiffs brought it about by voluntarily electing to sue for damages in Saluda county, in a Court having no jurisdiction of the cause of action for penalty.
*3922 If defendant desired to avail itself of objection to the capacity of plaintiffs to sue there should have been a general appearance.
Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Pope. I dissent and concur in the opinion of Judge Jones.
Mr. Justice Gary dissents.