Court Opinion

ID: 9646497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:01:07.774568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:38.646792
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
Appellant’s motion for rehearing reurges the point that the jury’s award of attorney’s fees is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. We have reviewed the record and we conclude that the jury’s verdict is not so against the great weight or preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust or clearly wrong, nor was the result of passion, prejudice, or improper motive, and that it was not in obvious conflict with justice so as to render it unconscionable. Simmes v. Price, Dallam Dig., 618 (Tex.1844); Bowen v. Merrit, Inc., 417 S.W.2d 313 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth, 1967, no writ).
Rehearing denied.