Court Opinion

ID: 9309958
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:38:11.886083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:06.111938
License: Public Domain

SMITH, J.
It was error in the trial court to charge the jury that “if you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff was without fault he would be entitled to recover.” This is not a prbper statement of the law to the jury, as it eliminates from the case the duty on the part of the plaintiff to prove that the negligence of the defendant caused the injury complained of, and we do not think the effect of this charge was removed by the court.
Upon the question of the verdict being excessive, we-are of the opinion that such is the case, and had the verdict 'been for a sum in the neighborhood of $250, under the evidence it would seem more reasonable
Judgment reversed.
Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.