Court Opinion

ID: 1005932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:03:36.091698+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:09.417610
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7302

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARK NATHANIEL CHAPMAN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-97-478-AW, CA-00-2695-AW)

Submitted:   November 8, 2001          Decided:     November 19, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Nathaniel Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Barbara
Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Deborah A.
Johnston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Mary-
land, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mark Nathaniel Chapman seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Chapman, Nos. CR-97-478-

AW; CA-00-2695-AW (D. Md. July 13, 2001).    We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2