Court Opinion

ID: 3110241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:41:03.706523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:35.526150
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-10-00152-CR

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                    AT AMARILLO

                                      PANEL A

                                    APRIL 8, 2011

                    KANAYO EUGENE UBESIE, JR., APPELLANT

                                          v.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

               FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF NAVARRO COUNTY;

                NO. 61,354; HONORABLE JOHN JACKSON, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                        ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND

      Appellant, Kanayo Eugene Ubesie, filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for

driving while intoxicated, and sentence of 180 days incarceration in the Navarro County

Jail and $1,000 fine. Sentence was suspended by the trial court and appellant was

placed on community supervision for a period of two years. The appellate court clerk

received and filed the trial court clerk=s record on April 30, 2010. The official court

reporter’s record was filed on June 7. Consequently, appellant’s brief was due on July

8. On July 7, this Court received appellant’s request for extension of time to file his

brief, which was granted to extend the deadline for appellant’s brief to August 6. On
August 16, appellant filed a second request for extension of time to file his brief. Again,

this request was granted and the deadline for appellant’s brief was set on September 7.

Just before the September 7 deadline, appellant’s counsel sought permission to

withdraw from representation of appellant. This Court granted counsel’s motion. As a

result, appellant filed a pro se motion for extension of time to file his brief on September

13, which this Court granted. On September 17, this Court entered an Order abating

and remanding the cause because the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of

appeal was defective. The appeal was reinstated on October 28. On November 23,

this Court granted appellant’s fourth request for extension of time to file his brief,

extending the deadline to December 23. On January 3, 2011, this Court sent appellant

notice that his brief was past-due and directing him to file his brief by January 13 or the

appeal would be abated and remanded to the trial court. On January 6, newly retained

counsel for appellant filed a request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, which

was granted to January 24. However, after appellant failed to meet this deadline, he

was notified that failure to file his brief by February 10 may result in the appeal being

abated and remanded. On February 3, appellant filed another request for extension of

time to file his brief on the basis that he had discovered that certain necessary exhibits

had been omitted from the reporter’s record. This motion for extension of time was

granted and the deadline for appellant’s brief was extended to February 14. Appellant

again failed to comply with the deadline set by this Court and, on March 11, appellant

requested yet another extension of time to file his brief. By letter dated March 15, this

Court denied this sixth request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief and directed

                                             2
appellant to file his brief on or before March 20. To date, appellant has still not filed his

brief.

         Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to

immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1)

whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute

this appeal, whether appellant is indigent; (3) if appellant desires to prosecute this

appeal and is indigent, whether appellant=s present counsel should be replaced; (4)

whether present counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal; and (5) what orders,

if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation

to dismiss appellant=s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal or, if

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently

pursued. If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be

replaced, the trial court should cause the Clerk of this Court to be furnished the name,

address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly appointed or newly

retained attorney.

         The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and

file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations and cause

them to be included in a supplemental clerk=s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings

to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter=s record; (4) have a record of

the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the

supplemental clerk=s record or the supplemental reporter=s record; and (5) cause the

                                             3
records of the proceedings to be sent to this Court. In the absence of a request for

extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk=s record, supplemental

reporter=s record, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings,

conclusions, and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the Clerk of

this Court not later than May 9, 2011.

                                               Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                           4