Court Opinion

ID: 3642961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:00:01.793371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:43:35.956901
License: Public Domain

From a judgment of nonsuit as to defendant Life Insurance Company plaintiff appealed.
The facts as disclosed by the record are substantially as follows:
The plaintiff, who is a reputable colored physician of Durham, N.C. took out a policy of insurance in defendant company on 19 August, 1931, and paid the semiannual premium of $208.40 to the soliciting agent, Solomon Blomberg. When the next semiannual premium became due on 19 February, 1932, plaintiff paid $26.25 in cash to Blomberg, and *Page 297 
gave a note to the company for the balance of the premium of $182.15. This note was made payable to the New York Life Insurance Company at Charlotte, N.C. on or before 19 May, 1932, and contains the provision that if not paid when due all rights under the policy would be terminated. Plaintiff testified he later paid the note to Blomberg, but did not get the note or official premium receipt. The company lapsed the policy for nonpayment of the second semiannual premium. The policy of insurance contained the following provision: "All premiums are payable on or before their due date at the home office of the company or to an authorized agent of the company, but only in exchange for the company's official premium receipt signed by the president, a vice-president, a third vice-president, a secretary, or the treasurer of the company, and countersigned by the person receiving the premium. No person has any authority to collect a premium unless he then holds said official premium receipt."
On 26 March, 1934, at the instance of the southern representative of defendant company, Blomberg gave plaintiff his personal check for $208.00, but the check was returned unpaid, with notation "account closed."
Thereafter, on 7 December, 1934, plaintiff instituted this action against the defendants, in the court of a justice of the peace, to recover $200.00 (remitting all over that amount).
At the close of the evidence motion for nonsuit was sustained and from judgment thereon plaintiff appealed.
The company admits the payment of the first semiannual premium, but without this admission payment to the soliciting agent Blomberg would constitute payment to the company by virtue of C. S., 6304.
But the payment to Blomberg of the amount of a later premium, becoming due thereafter, would not constitute payment to the company. Thompson v.Assurance Society, 199 N.C. 59. There is no evidence the company ever received any part of it, nor is it contended the payment was made in exchange for the official premium receipt required by the insurance contract, and the note given for part of the premium was on its face made payable to the company in Charlotte. Plaintiff testified he later paid this note to Blomberg but without requiring the production of the note or the premium receipt.
The case of Hughes v. Lewis, 203 N.C. 775, is not in conflict with the rule laid down in Thompson v. Assurance Society, supra. In *Page 298 Hughes v. Lewis, supra, the facts were the reverse of those in the case at bar. There the insurance company, in attempting to refund to the insured the unearned portion of a premium, paid it to a local agent, who did not pay all of it to the insured, and it was held the company was liable to the insured for the unpaid portion.
Plaintiff has suffered a regrettable loss, but fault therefor may not, in law, be laid at the door of defendant insurance company.
Affirmed.