Court Opinion

ID: 9409672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-19 06:07:24.532235+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:52.721304
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed July 17, 2023

                                    S  In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00439-CV

     IN RE COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS
 SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, Relator

           Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court
                             Dallas County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-18552

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                 Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel
                            Opinion by Justice Miskel
      In its May 10, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from

part of a trial court order compelling it to answer an interrogatory.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Emily Miskel/
                                         EMILY MISKEL
                                         JUSTICE
230439F.P05

                                      –2–