Court Opinion

ID: 7272116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:29:45.811316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:47.066621
License: Public Domain

CCA 201100248. Review granted on the following issue:
IN MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT THE TRIER OF FACT MUST DETERMINE WHETHER JUDICIALLY-CREATED FACTORS THAT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED AND CRIMINAL CONDUCT ARE SATISFIED. THE FACTORS IDENTIFIED IN UNITED STATES v. MAR-CUM ARE AN EXAMPLE OF SUCH FACTORS BUT THE LOWER COURT HELD THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER THE MARCUM FACTORS ARE SATISFIED. WHO DETERMINES WHETHER THEY HAVE BEEN SATISFIED?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.