Court Opinion

ID: 1020298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:49:06.031874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:53.991200
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 06-6739

JAMES PHILLIP MEGGS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00061)

Submitted: August 24, 2006                 Decided: August 31, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Phillip Meggs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          James Phillip Meggs appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.    We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.       Meggs v.

North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00061 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2006).      We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -