Court Opinion

ID: 2943516
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 01:49:34.639136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:26.419037
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,349

            EX PARTE RAYMOND CHARLES JACKSON, JR., Applicant

         ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
  CAUSE NO. W08-60876-H(B) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1
                      FROM DALLAS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                           OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court to give counsel an

opportunity to respond by way of affidavit.

        The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We
                                                                                                       2

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. W08-60876 from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: May 12, 2010
Do Not Publish