Court Opinion

ID: 9409297
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-17 18:00:50.864239+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:49.798112
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50893         Document: 00516822261             Page: 1      Date Filed: 07/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50893
                                     Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                     ____________                                     July 17, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Maurillo Montoya,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:22-CR-118-3
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Maurillo Montoya has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Montoya has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Montoya’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50893    Document: 00516822261          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/17/2023

                                  No. 22-50893

   response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2