Court Opinion

ID: 9959408
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-11 17:09:14.011278+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:38.578023
License: Public Domain

People v Urbistondo (2024 NY Slip Op 01995)

People v Urbistondo

2024 NY Slip Op 01995

Decided on April 11, 2024

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 11, 2024

Before: Oing, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, JJ. 

Ind No. 74614/22 Appeal No. 2021 Case No. 2023-03069 

[*1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent, 
vFelix Urbistondo, Defendant-Appellant.

Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), rendered May 10, 2023,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: April 11, 2024
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.