Court Opinion

ID: 7178615
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:44:31.098377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:53.625050
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Henry Floyd Gilchrist appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order denying his motions for a protective order and for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.