Court Opinion

ID: 4994870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-27 07:23:19.471808+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:16:47.238432
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                NOS. WR-87,603-02 & 87,603-03

                     EX PARTE LARRY EUGENE JOHNSON, Applicant

             ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
        CAUSE NOS. 1394883-A & 1394884-A IN THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM HARRIS COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of possession of marijuana and delivery of marijuana. He was

sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for each offense, to run concurrently. Applicant did not

appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant, among other things, contends that plea was involuntary due to false evidence.

The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommends that this Court grant

relief. However, it is not clear from the record whether Applicant has shown “confinement” as

required by the statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 § 3(c) (confinement means

“confinement for any offense or any collateral consequence resulting from the conviction that is the
                                                                                                       2

basis of the instant habeas corpus”); Ex parte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 457 (Tex. Crim. App.

2010). Additionally, there are no findings addressing Applicant’s actual innocence claim, which

must be resolved before claims resulting in a lesser form of relief will be resolved. See Ex parte

Reyes, 474 S.W.3d 677, 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). Accordingly, the record should be developed.

The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(d). In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel

to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

is confined as defined by Article 11.07 § 3(c). The trial court shall also make specific findings as

to whether Applicant waived his actual innocence claim, and if Applicant has not, it shall make

findings resolving the merits of that claim. The trial court may make any other findings and

conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
                            3

Filed: September 22, 2021
Do not publish