Court Opinion

ID: 5792753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:12:37.038961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:19.634227
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), rendered January 13, 2009, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, made upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous adjudication as a youthful offender, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.