Court Opinion

ID: 676198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 16:01:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:01.304025
License: Public Domain

32 F.3d 563
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Earvin SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;  William Wallace, Warden of CentralCorrectional Institution;  T. Travis Medlock,Attorney General of the State of SouthCarolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-6403.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
July 21, 1994.

Earvin Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Smith v. South Carolina, No. CA-91-3259-3-20BD (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED