Court Opinion

ID: 2168537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:07.21475+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:00.768179
License: Public Domain

297 S.W.3d 645 (2009)
James GARDNER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92793.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
November 17, 2009.
*646 Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Gardner appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.[1] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.