Court Opinion

ID: 558704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:10:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:48.245283
License: Public Domain

930 F.2d 23Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Nathaniel JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Paul DAVIS, Chairman, Wolfgang, Parole Commissioner,Williams, Parole Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6391.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 1990.Decided April 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge.  (CA-89-2696-H)
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr., appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, George Albert Eichhorn, III, Assistant Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Johnson v. Davis, CA-89-2696-H (D.Md. Aug. 30, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.