Court Opinion

ID: 4374975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-07 19:03:23.888682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:44.216350
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                        Docket No. 46198

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )
                                                )     Filed: March 7, 2019
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )
                                                )     Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
v.                                              )
                                                )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
LAWRENCE HENRY GRIZZARD,                        )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
                                                )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin
       Falls County. Hon. Benjamin J. Cluff, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty-one years, with a
       minimum period of confinement of six years, for robbery, affirmed.

       Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                      Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;
                                  and LORELLO, Judge
                   ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Lawrence Henry Grizzard pleaded guilty to robbery, Idaho Code § 18-6501. The district
court imposed a unified sentence of twenty-one years, with six years determinate. Grizzard
appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

                                                1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Grizzard’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2