Court Opinion

ID: 5609290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:54:01.091617+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:03.029863
License: Public Domain

Broyles, P. J.
1. There was no error in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the 9th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th paragraphs of the defendant’s cross-petition as embodied in his answer, and in striking them from the answer.
2. Under the facts of the ease the trial judge did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $101.41 principal and $21.90 interest.
3. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworfh, JJ., concur.