Court Opinion

ID: 9685956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:10:54.668454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:11.851662
License: Public Domain

T. M. Burns, J.
(concurring). Although I originally was of the contrary view, see People v *515Beamon, 83 Mich App 121; 268 NW2d 310 (1978), a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum is not a detainer within the meaning of Article IV(e) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. United States v Mauro, 436 US 340; 98 S Ct 1834; 56 L Ed 2d 329 (1978). Because the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Mauro cannot be distinguished from the instant case, I concur in the result reached by the majority.