Court Opinion

ID: 6700978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 22:09:07.616772+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:25.157784
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The' evidence is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. When considered contextually the charge of the court complies with G.S. 1-180. Applicable principles of law were explained to the jury in a substantially correct manner. State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146; State v. Jestes, 185 N.C. 735, 117 S.E. 385; State v. Peterson, 129 N.C. 556, 40 S.E. 9. We find from the record no error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.
No error.