Court Opinion

ID: 989980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:14:47.881284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:44.112305
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-8557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTONIO BLAND, a/k/a Anthony Scott Lloyd,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News.     Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-39-NN, CA-94-80-4)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                  Decided:   July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Bland, Appellant Pro Se. Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

habeas motion, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bland, Nos. CR-

93-39-NN; CA-94-80-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2