Court Opinion

ID: 2271261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:56:43.36573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:28.980572
License: Public Domain

331 S.W.3d 739 (2011)
Aaron BRADFORD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94765.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
February 22, 2011.
Brocca Leah Smith, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant.
Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Aaron Bradford appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.[1] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *740 judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.