Court Opinion

ID: 714266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:47:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:24.903000
License: Public Domain

78 F.3d 580
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Lee Marvin WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.David L. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-8540.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.Decided Feb. 29, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   James C. Turk, District Judge.  (CA-95-876-R)
Lee Marvin Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day period established by Fed.  R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed.  R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed.  R.App. P. 4(a)(6).   The time periods established by Fed.  R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional."  Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

2
The district court dismissed Appellant's action by order entered August 22, 1995.   On October 10, 1995, Appellant filed some papers which the district court construed as a motion for reconsideration.   The district court denied the motion for reconsideration on October 27, 1995.   Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 13, 1995.   Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case.   We therefore dismiss the appeal.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3
DISMISSED.