Court Opinion

ID: 4425680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-15 08:51:20.033042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:33.967879
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                   San Antonio, Texas
                                         August 14, 2019

                                      No. 04-19-00461-CV

                                        Nancy ALANIS,
                                           Appellant

                                                v.

                           WELLS FARGO BANK NA, as Trustee,
                                     Appellee

                  From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas
                              Trial Court No. 2019-CV-00584
                        Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER
       The clerk’s record has been filed. It shows this appeal concerns a forcible detainer action.
The appealed judgment orders that appellee recover possession of the property. The clerk’s
record shows appellant timely posted an appeal bond in the amount set by the trial court.
However, the trial court thereafter issued a writ of possession.

        Jurisdictional defects cannot be waived, and such defects in the appellate court and in the
trial court may be noted by the appellate court sua sponte. See Tex. Ass’n. of Bus. v. Tex. Air
Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445–46 (Tex.1993). Courts lack jurisdiction when an issue or
dispute becomes moot. Briones v. Brazos Bend Villa Apts., 438 S.W.3d 808, 812 (Tex. App.—
Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). “Judgment of possession in a forcible detainer action is not
intended to be a final determination of whether the eviction is wrongful; rather, it is a
determination of the right to immediate possession.” Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San
Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006). The issue of possession in a forcible detainer action
can become moot if the appellant is no longer in possession, and the appellant does not have a
potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession. See Briones, 438 S.W.3d at
812. When the issue of possession becomes moot, we will vacate the trial court’s judgment and
dismiss the case. Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 790; see, e.g., Molina v. Stonegate Mortgage Corp.,
No. 04-16-00520-CV, 2016 WL 6885810, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 23, 2016, no
pet.) (mem. op.).

      We therefore ORDER appellant to file a response in this court by September 3, 2019
showing why the issue of possession is not moot. A failure to timely respond and address the
noted jurisdictional defect will result in a dismissal of this appeal. If a supplemental clerk’s
record is necessary, appellant must (a) ask the trial court clerk to prepare the record, and (b)
notify this court that such a request was made. We further ORDER the appellate deadlines
suspended until further order of this court.

                                                   _________________________________
                                                   Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 14th day of August, 2019.

                                                   ___________________________________
                                                   Keith E. Hottle,
                                                   Clerk of Court