Court Opinion

ID: 8458631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 05:15:17.527303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:06.657703
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pensicola Banks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA, 2013 WL 4511597 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.