Court Opinion

ID: 9559338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:27:01.101122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:45.709685
License: Public Domain

Wedell, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part): I concur in the ruling that the allegations of duress contained in the petition are sufficient as against the special demurrer. I am also willing to say the ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings is not properly reviewable. I do not agree the ruling on plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s answer is not here for review. That demurrer challenged the legal validity of the purported voting trust agreement under our corporation code and the legal effect of allegations intended to show subsequent ratification of the agreement. As I see it the ruling on that demurrer presented purely questions of law and it is so argued by the parties. I think the ruling is properly here for review.