Court Opinion

ID: 8423464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 23:37:59.046052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:27.503131
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Coleman A. Stigall, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stigall v. Thompson, No. CA-02-1281-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED