Court Opinion

ID: 9352140
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-05 10:10:17.167142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:58:12.177023
License: Public Domain

In The
                                   Court of Appeals
                          Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                         No. 07-22-00296-CR

                              MICHAEL DEAN DAVIS, APPELLANT

                                                   V.

                               THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                           On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2
                                        Tarrant County, Texas1
                      Trial Court No. 1711862, Honorable Betty Arvin, Presiding

                                        December 29, 2022
                        ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                         Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

        Appellant, Michael Dean Davis, appeals his conviction for driving while

intoxicated.2 The appellate record was originally due November 28, 2022. The clerk’s

record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was not. By letter of December

8, 2022, we notified the reporter that the record was overdue and directed her to advise

        1Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
        2   See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.04.
this Court of the status of the record by December 19. To date, the reporter’s record has

not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication with this Court.

       Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring

appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to

preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,

the trial court shall determine the following:

       (1)    what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

       (2)    why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

       (3)    what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those

              tasks; and

       (4)    whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court

              finds reasonable.

       Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January

30, 2023.

       Should the reporter file the record on or before January 12, 2023, she is directed

to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall

not be required to take any further action.

                                                 2
      It is so ordered.

                              Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                          3