Court Opinion

ID: 7103496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:18:14.249488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:13:29.612514
License: Public Domain

Servers, C. J.
— The only ground of negligence stated in the petition is that defendant’s train which caused the injury was being operated and run at a rate of speed exceeding eight miles an hour. It is provided by statute that any “corporation operating a railroad that fails to fence the same against live stock running at large, at all points where such right to fence exists, shall be liable to the owner of any stock injured or killed by reason of such want of fence, for the value of the property or damage caused, unless the same was caused by the wilful act of the owner or his agent; and in order to recover it shall only be necessary for the owner to prove the injury or destruction of his property: * * * provided, * * * the operating of trains upon depot grounds necessarily used by the company and public, where no such fence is built, at a greater rate of speed than eight miles an hour, shall be deemed negligence, and render the company liable, under this section.” Code, sec. 1289. As the horse killed was not running at large, the material inquiry is whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover under this section. This inquiry must be answered in the negative. It seems to us that it is not possible to construe the statute otherwise. This is what the statute plainly says. The only liability under it is for stock injured or killed which is running at large. Monahan v. Keokuk & Des M. Ry. Co., 45 Iowa, 523. As this view is in accord with the ruling of the district court, the result is that the judgment must be
Aeeirmed.