Court Opinion

ID: 7067901
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 07:28:51.403645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:29.304322
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing.
Felt, J.
Appellant’s learned counsel insist that the court erred in the original opinion in failing to consider the tenth ground of its motion for a new trial, which alleges that certain enumerated special findings “are not nor are either of them sustained by sufficient evidence.”
13. Such assignment of causes for a new trial is unauthorized by our statute and has been held insufficient. Scott v. Collier (1906), 166 Ind. 644, 647, 648, 78 N. E. 184; Sievers v. Peters Box, etc., Co. (1898), 151 Ind. 642, 656, 50 N. E. 877, 52 N. E. 399; Vandalia Coal Co. v. Price (1912), 178 Ind. 546, 559, 97 N. E. 429; Smith v. McDonald (1912), 49 Ind. App. 464, 465, 97 N. E. 556; Hamrick v. Hoover (1908), 41 Ind. App. 411, 415, 84 N. E. 28; Major v. Miller (1905), 165 Ind. 275, 278, 75 N. E. 159.
On re-examination of the briefs wo find that .all material questions duly presented were considered and decided. We are content with the decision, and the petition for a rehearing is overruled.