Court Opinion

ID: 998604
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:13:31.38186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:50.085552
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-6005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

COREY THOMAS JONES,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-91-368)

Submitted:   April 29, 1999                   Decided:   May 5, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Thomas Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Corey Thomas Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

his “motion to append the presentence report.”    We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Jones, No. CR-91-368 (E.D. Va. Nov.

12, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2