Court Opinion

ID: 9930066
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-06 01:00:45.636159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:52:24.075813
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-50317         Document: 00517055667             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/05/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-50317
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                               February 5, 2024
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jorge Luis Martinez-Banegas,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                              USDC No. 2:22-CR-1494-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Luis Martinez-Banegas has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Banegas has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-50317    Document: 00517055667          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/05/2024

                                  No. 23-50317

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2