Court Opinion

ID: 9505613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 20:13:09.330693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:39.357823
License: Public Domain

SULLIVAN, Justice,
concurring in part and concurring in result.
I agree with the majority that the trial court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim seeking damages for injuries they allege they suffered when their child was born with profound, life-threatening disabilities. However, I disagree with its analysis in several respects. As to both liability and to damages other than damages for emotional distress, I would adopt the reasoning of the Court of Appeals in this case. See Bader v. Johnson, 675 N.E.2d 1119, 1122-1125, 1125 (Ind.Ct.App.1997). As to damages for emotional distress, I concur in the majority’s analysis.