Court Opinion

ID: 2950894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:50:37.396026+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:49.906421
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-82,545-01

                           IN RE MICHAEL FERNANDEZ, Relator

                   ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                 CAUSE NO. C14-00391 IN THE 384TH DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM EL PASO COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 384th District Court of El Paso County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

       In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of El Paso

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
                                                                                                   2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in El Paso County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: January 7, 2015
Do not publish