Court Opinion

ID: 9731308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 15:41:49.433061+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:09:14.351225
License: Public Domain

Holbrook, Jr., P.J.
(concurring). I concur in parts i and in of Judge O’Connell’s opinion. With regard to part n, I concur with Judge Jansen that defendant’s conviction should be affirmed because the search warrant was supported by probable cause. I write separately to state that, because the search warrant was supported by probable cause, we need not reach the issue whether a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule should be adopted in this state. Nonetheless, I have expressed my opinion regarding that issue previously, in People v Tanis, 153 Mich App 806, 813; 396 NW2d 544 (1986), and I reaffirm that stance today. Accordingly, I too would affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences.