Court Opinion

ID: 998802
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:16:17.01683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:09.787518
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6015

DON FAIRFIELD,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-736-5-HC-H)

Submitted:   May 25, 1999                     Decided:   May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Fairfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Don Fairfield appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.     See Fairfield v. United States, No. CA-98-736-5-HC-H

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2