Court Opinion

ID: 9911197
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 18:01:46.132399+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:56:37.882803
License: Public Domain

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

                                    Before
                        HACKEL, GROSS, and BLOSSER
                           Appellate Military Judges

                             _________________________

                               UNITED STATES
                                   Appellee

                                           v.

                        Antoine D. PERRY
         Aviation Ordnanceman Airman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy
                             Appellant

                                  No. 202300124

                             _________________________

                             Decided: 19 December 2023

      Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                                 Military Judges:
                           Justin C. Henderson (trial)
                       Michelle M. Pettit (post-trial matters)

    Sentence adjudged 8 March 2023 by a special court-martial convened
    at Region Legal Service Office Northwest, Bremerton, Washington, con-
    sisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judg-
    ment: a reprimand, confinement for ninety days, 1 forfeiture of $1,255.00
    pay per month for one month, and a bad-conduct discharge.

    1 Appellant was credited with twenty-nine days of pretrial confinement credit and

seven days of judicially ordered credit for thirty-six total days of confinement credit.
                United States v. Perry, NMCCA No. 202300124
                             Opinion of the Court

                               For Appellant:
                   Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN

                           _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                           _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case,
we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct
in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. 2
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                  FOR THE COURT:

                                  MARK K. JAMISON
                                  Clerk of Court

   2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

                                         2