Court Opinion

ID: 8354313
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-18 00:03:23.43467+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:54.257598
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission on questions of fact. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 156 Ohio St., 282, 102 N. E. (2d), 246.

Order affirmed.

Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.
Weygandt, C. J., not participating.