Court Opinion

ID: 4109282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-21 01:01:03.583188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:05.484056
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-20051      Document: 00513805479         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/20/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-20051
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        December 20, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAURICIO LINO REYES, also known as Mauricio Reyes, also known as
Mauricio Bonilla Reyes, also known as Antonio Bonilla-Reyes, also known as
Victor Escalante-Ramirez, also known as Mauricio L. Reyes, also known as
Cristobal Mendez-Bonilla, also known as Cristobal Mendez Bonilla, also
known as Antonio Bonilla,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:15-CR-554-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauricio Lino Reyes
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-20051    Document: 00513805479    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/20/2016

                                No. 16-20051

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2