Court Opinion

ID: 9299650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:06:11.819708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:38.102576
License: Public Domain

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice
(PETERS, District Judge, absent).
This demurrer cannot be sustained. Every part of the bill must, for the present, be considered as true. T¿e debt now sought to be recovered, was originally due to Johnson & Smith; and, if the actions which are now impeached on the ground of fraud, had not occurred, the representatives of Johnson could alone have maintained a suit at law to recover the debt. But, under all the circumstances of this case, the complainants are without remedy at law, and in equity, they are the proper and only persons who can, on this side, of the court, ask for the relief prayed by this bill, which, in effect, is to put out of their way the assignment to Smith, and to decree payment of the original debt by the representatives of the solvent, but not surviving debtor. They do not claim under, but in opposition to the assignment to Smith; and on this ground, their title, in equity, to the debt, is unquestionable. It was unnecessary to have made the representatives of Smith parties, because they can have no claim, except against the plaintiffs, for any balance which may remain after paying the partnership debts, and until the plaintiffs shall refuse to account for such balance, the representatives of Smith can have no claim, and ought not, unnecessarily, to be pressed into the controversy. Neither is it an objection, that no offer is made to reassign the deed from Lloyd & Sparks to Smith. If this should, in the further progress of the cause, be thought useful or necessary, it can be so ordered by the court. These last points are noticed, because they were urged in argument, in support of the demurrer, though not stated as causes of demurrer.
Demurrer overruled, with costs, and defendant ordered to answer.