Court Opinion

ID: 995930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:43:57.915726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.236259
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6518

DONALD R. LOHR,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

LEWIS BARLOW,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-70)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                 Decided:   August 12, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald R. Lohr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismiss-

ing without prejudice   his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Lohr v. Barlow, No. CA-98-70

(E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1998). Given the disposition of his appeal, Ap-

pellant’s Motion for Appeal Bond is now moot and is denied for that

reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2