Court Opinion

ID: 6456233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:41:16.477073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:53:18.861692
License: Public Domain

The action was properly dismissed. The title to the cause of action set out in the complaint had vested in the plaintiffs’ trustee in bankruptcy under the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 110(a)(6) (1976), with the result that the action could not be maintained by the plaintiffs. See 4A Collier, Bankruptcy par. 70.28[6] (14th ed. 1976); Gochenour v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co., 118 F.2d 89, 93 (6th Cir. 1941); Constant v. Kulukundis, 125 F. Supp. 305, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 1954); Hermsmeyer v. A.L.D. Inc., 239 F.Supp. 740, 742-743 (D. Colo. 1964); Moore v. Slonim, 426 F. Supp. 524, 526-527 (D. Conn.), aff'd, 562 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1977).

Judgment affirmed.