Court Opinion

ID: 1012094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:39:14.369116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:00.413557
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 03-7156

DAVID J. OAKES,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM F. DALIUS, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-498-5-H)

Submitted:   December 11, 2003         Decided:     December 19, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David J. Oakes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David J. Oakes appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), as frivolous. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   See Oakes

v. Dalius, No. CA-03-498-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2