Court Opinion

ID: 2678106
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-06-12 14:04:00.311792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:50.025204
License: Public Domain

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and
Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors
so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 14-BG-212

IN RE: WILLIAM S. BRADBURY,
                       Respondent.
Bar Registration No. 49502                               BDN: 412-13

BEFORE:       McLeese, Associate Judge, and Steadman and Reid, Senior Judges.

                                      ORDER
                                (FILED - June 12, 2014)

      On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice
of law in the state of Virginia for a period of three years, this court’s March 26, 2014,
order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the
court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline should not be
imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it
appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show
cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

       ORDERED that William S. Bradbury is hereby suspended from the practice of
law in the District of Columbia for a period of three years. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d
483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable
presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the
respondent does not participate). It is

       FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of
respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit
that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g).

                                           PER CURIAM