Court Opinion

ID: 2759178
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-12-10 15:03:42.917597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:58.687078
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 14-1713
                            Filed December 10, 2014

IN THE INTEREST OF C.N. and J.N.,
Minor Children,

S.N., Father,
       Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Rachael E. Seymour,

District Associate Judge.

      A father appeals from the order terminating his parental rights.

AFFIRMED.

      Blake D. Lubinus of Lubinus Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellant father.

      Lane Lucas, Des Moines, for mother.

      Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kathrine S. Miller-Todd, Assistant

Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Christina Gonzalez,

Assistant County Attorney, for appellee State.

      Charles Fuson of the Youth Law Center, Des Moines, for minor children.

      Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and Tabor, JJ.
                                           2

DANILSON, C.J.

       A father appeals the termination of his parental rights to his two children:

C.N, born in March 2009; and J.N., born in September 2010.1 Because statutory

grounds exist to terminate the father’s parental rights, and because termination is

in the best interests of the children, we affirm.

       We    conduct    a   de    novo    review    of   termination-of-parental-rights

proceedings. In re P.L., 773 N.W.2d 33, 40 (Iowa 2010).

       According to the father’s testimony, he resided in the Polk County Jail

from September 9, 2011, until he entered a federal correctional institution on

May 30, 2013. He is incarcerated at this time for drug charges. His date of

discharge is in January 2019.

       The children were removed from their mother’s care on July 10, 2013, and

adjudicated children in need of assistance (CINA) on August 29, 2013, due to the

mother’s substance abuse issues. At the time of the July 22, 2014 termination

hearing, the children had been removed from the physical care of their parents

for more than one year.       They could not be returned to their father’s care

because he remained incarcerated.           On July 22, 2014, the juvenile court

terminated the father’s parental rights pursuant to Iowa Code section

232.116(1)(e) (as to both children), (f) (as to C.N.), and (h) (as to J.N.) (2013).

       On appeal, the father challenges the termination of his parental rights only

as to section 232.116(1)(e) (failure to maintain significant contact). We may

1
  The mother separately appealed. However, her appeal was dismissed by an order of
the supreme court on November 10, 2014.
                                          3

affirm the juvenile court’s termination order on any ground that we find supported

by clear and convincing evidence. In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703, 707 (Iowa 2010).

       Section 232.116(1)(f) provides that termination may be ordered when

there is clear and convincing evidence that a child four years of age or older who

has been adjudicated a CINA and removed from the parents’ care for at least the

last twelve consecutive months cannot be returned to the parents’ custody at the

time of the termination hearing.      There is clear and convincing evidence to

support the termination of the father’s parental rights to C.N. pursuant to this

section.

       Section 232.116(1)(h) provides that termination may be ordered when

there is clear and convincing evidence that a child under the age of three who

has been adjudicated a CINA and removed from the parents’ care for at least the

last six consecutive months cannot be returned to the parents’ custody at the

time of the termination hearing.      There is clear and convincing evidence to

support termination of the father’s parental rights to J.N. pursuant to this section.

       Giving primary consideration to “the child[ren]’s safety, . . . the best

placement for furthering the long-term nurturing and growth of the child, and . . .

the physical, mental, and emotional condition and needs of the child,” Iowa Code

§ 232.116(2), we conclude termination of the father’s parental rights will best

provide the children with the permanency they deserve.

       While the father asks that we not terminate his parental rights because the

children are currently placed with his mother, legal custody of the children is with

the department of human services and, therefore, section 232.116(3)(a) is not

applicable. See In re A.M., 843 N.W.2d 100, 113 (Iowa 2014) (“Although section
                                        4

232.116(3)(a) allows the juvenile court not to terminate when a “relative has legal

custody of the child,” Iowa Code § 232.116(3)(a), A.M. is not in the legal custody

of her grandparents.”).   The juvenile court found no exception under section

232.116(3) applicable. We agree.

      AFFIRMED.