Court Opinion

ID: 185574
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-02-05 02:33:35+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:26:16.909626
License: Public Domain

ORDER
  

  Upon consideration of the appellant’s petition for rehearing, it is
 

  ORDERED that the court’s opinion filed on November 6, 2001 be amended as follows:
 

  Page 10: In the last paragraph, strike the phrase “further factual development about the ‘WALES’ check, and.” Thus, the last paragraph is to read:
 

  Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for a determination whether retention of Hutchinson’s identification for the purpose of running the “WALES” check was related to the purpose of the stop or caused the stop to go on for too long, thereby tainting the evidence and statements obtained by the police after the attempted ‘WALES” check.
 

  It is
 

  FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing be granted.