Court Opinion

ID: 9660641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:17:32.990446+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:20.598317
License: Public Domain

Thomas Gallagher, . Justice
(concurring specially).
I am of the opinion that the interests of orderly procedure and justice would have been better served had the trial court granted plaintiff’s motions for an order restraining defendants from proceedings with the hearings on their petitions and accounts as trustees until determination of these actions, or, in the alternative, ordered consolidation of the trial of these actions with the hearings on the trustees’ accounts. However the making of such orders rested in the trial court’s discretion, and in view of the circumstances present it cannot be said that such discretion was abused in denying plaintiff’s motions for the orders described.
Mr. Justice Frank T. Gallagher took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.