Court Opinion

ID: 4565143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-14 07:17:04.459745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:39.682874
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 10, 2020

                                       In The

                       Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-19-00746-CR

                       KENNETH BURNETT, Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                    On Appeal from the 338th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. 1577564

                 MEMORANDUM                       OPINION

      Kenneth Burnett appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly
weapon. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a
brief in which he concludes the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets
the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a
professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978).
      A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of his right to inspect the appellate record and file a pro se response to the brief. See
Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more
than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

      We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the
record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief when
we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State,
178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

      Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

                                    PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                           2