Court Opinion

ID: 801358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-05-31 18:53:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:40.015283
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 12-6460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

LEE MARK HUGGINS, JR.,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.   C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:00-cr-00503-CWH-17)

Submitted:   May 24, 2012                       Decided:   May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and    DAVIS,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Mark Huggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.    William E. Day, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Lee Mark Huggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence

reduction.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.    United States v. Huggins, No. 4:00-cr-00503-

CWH-17 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2