Court Opinion

ID: 1019746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:40:27.24107+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:09.713506
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6286

JIMMY EARL MCARTHUR,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00047)

Submitted: June 22, 2006                       Decided: June 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Earl McArthur, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Jimmy Earl McArthur appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   McArthur v.

North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00047 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006).      We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -