Court Opinion

ID: 9825458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 13:02:31.375845+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:50.511574
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
While disapproving the language used in argument, commented upon by the Court of Appeals, yet we are unwilling to reverse the judgment of that court, which carefully reviewed the whole record, to the effect that prejudicial error did not intervene. As said in Peterson v. State, 227 Ala. 361, 150 So. 156, 160: “Should it be treated, however, as improper argument, yet we think it may be permitted to pass as belonging to that class of hasty or exaggerated statements of opinion counsel often make in the heat of debate, which do not, and are not expected to become factors in the -formation of the verdict, and which usually are valued at their true worth.”
Writ denied.
GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.