Court Opinion

ID: 6089082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 19:40:27.126506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:30.913759
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Livingston County Court (Robert B. Wiggins, J.), dated October 23, 2014. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court’s upward departure from his presumptive classification as a level two risk is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We reject that contention. “ ‘The court’s discretionary upward departure [to a level three risk] was based on clear and convincing evidence of aggravating factors *1675to a degree not taken into account by the risk assessment instrument’ ” (People v Tidd, 128 AD3d 1537, 1537 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 913 [2015]). We reject defendant’s further contention that the court improperly admitted a sworn deposition from each of the two victims inasmuch as those depositions constitute “reliable hearsay” that the court could properly consider in making an upward departure (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Pichcuskie, 111 AD3d 1344, 1344 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 861 [2014]).
Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, DeJoseph and NeMoyer, JJ.