Court Opinion

ID: 2795807
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-22 17:04:23.630875+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:36.862777
License: Public Domain

Filed 4/22/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 86

David Michael Mesch, 		Petitioner and Appellant

v.

Grant Levi, Director of the North Dakota 

Department of Transportation, 		Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140419

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann Edward Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Thomas F. Murtha IV, P.O. Box 1111, Dickinson, N.D. 58602-1111, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.

Douglas B. Anderson, Office of Attorney General, 500 North Ninth Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Mesch v. Levi

No. 20140419

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	David Mesch appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision suspending his driving privileges for 180 days.  Mesch argues the warrantless search of his breath was unlawful because his consent to the searches was coerced, and the implied consent statute is unconstitutional because it violates the unconstitutional conditions doctrine.  We have previously held that consent to a chemical breath test is not involuntary or coerced solely because an individual is advised of the implied consent law, which criminalizes refusal.  
State v. Smith
, 2014 ND 152, 849 N.W.2d 599, and 
McCoy v. North Dakota Dep’t of Transp.
, 2014 ND 119, 848 N.W.2d 659.  We have also previously rejected Mesch’s argument that the implied consent law is unconstitutional because it violates the unconstitutional conditions doctrine.  
Beylund v. Levi
, 2015 ND 18, ¶¶ 16-30, 859 N.W.2d 403.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner