Court Opinion

ID: 9686465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:49:41.268883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:44:00.518901
License: Public Domain

SABERS, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in all respects except that I would affirm the trial court on Count II also. It appears to me that Count II was predicated not only on the terms of the financing contracts, as the majority concluded, but also on conversations, the course of dealing, and correspondence. Therefore, there is a genuine issue of material fact for the jury on whether there is an implied duty on the part of the PCA to (1) make every effort to stay with the defendants; (2) consider forbearance; and (3) abstain from foreclosure where possible. Because there is verbal and nonverbal evidence, we are limited by the clearly erroneous rule and we should affirm unless the findings of fact were clearly erroneous.