Court Opinion

ID: 9678314
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:16:40.78502+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:03.567615
License: Public Domain

Cheuvront.D.J.,
dissenting.
I agree that the employment contract between Daly and Cleasby was not fully integrated; I further agree that the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act does not apply.
I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which states: “The evidence on the issue of justification because of business necessity is undisputed and conclusive in favor of Daly ...” In my opinion the record in this case does not support such a conclusion. Rather, a factual question did exist which was for the jury to decide. Even Daly’s own employees gave conflicting reasons for the discharge. I would affirm.