Court Opinion

ID: 9555573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-14 15:08:26.773397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:36:51.611834
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued August 10, 2023

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                           ————————————
                              NO. 01-23-00147-CV
                           ———————————
   RICHARD STILLWELL A/K/A WILBERT RICHARD STILLWELL,
                         Appellant
                                        V.
 NORTH EAST PINE VILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION D/B/A
        PINE VILLAGE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Case No. 2016-74522

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Richard Stillwell, also known as Wilbert Richard Stillwell, has

neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See

TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
§§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court,

in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On

March 21, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if

appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by April 20, 2023.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

      Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On April 12, 2023,

appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not

submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant did not adequately respond.

      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

                                          2