Court Opinion

ID: 9588698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:37:04.699405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:19.483029
License: Public Domain

Deen, Presiding Judge,
concurring specially.
Were it not for the whole court case of Taylor v. State, 186 Ga. App. 113 (3) (366 SE2d 422) (1988), I would conclude that the pro*366claimed pronounced punishment was intended for repeated sale of specific enumerated drugs without any regard given to the transgression of the peculiar and particular statutory acts involved. However, since the whole court has spoken, I must yield to the majority.
Decided November 1, 1989.
Cowen & Cowen, Linda S. Cowen, for appellant.
Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Clifford A. Sticker, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.