Court Opinion

ID: 8441928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:01:21.971113+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:50.228485
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Clinton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in his sentence. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clinton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Clinton has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.