Court Opinion

ID: 8159396
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:47:41.425477+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:37.534338
License: Public Domain

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California.

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U. S. 539, 552-4; Lehmann v. Board of Accountancy, 263 U. S. 394, 398; cf. Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, 376-7; (2) Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U. S. 692, 698; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U. S. 655, 656; cf. Dohany v. Rogers, 281 U. S. 362, 369; (3) Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Slade, 216 U. S. 78, 83; Mobile, J. & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U. S. 187, 204.