Court Opinion

ID: 990831
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:27:41.326121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:31.303075
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 96-7144

RAYMOND PETERSON,

                                                   Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

ALTON R. ANDERSON;      JOHN    WILLIAMS;    D.    C.
KINGSBURY,

                                                  Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh.     W. Earl Britt, District
Judge. (CA-95-320-5-CT-BR)

Submitted:   November 7, 1996               Decided:    November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Peterson v. Anderson, No.
CA-95-320-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. July 5, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2