Court Opinion

ID: 4866422
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 02:19:23.829509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:10.414527
License: Public Domain

WINDOM, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in affirming Lane’s conviction. For the reasons stated in my writing on original submission, I disagree with the plurality’s decision to overturn Lane’s 120-year sentence and to remand the case for re-sentencing. I, therefore, dissent from the affirmance of Lane’s sentence on return to remand.
*824MAIN, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in affirming Carlton Reashard Lane’s conviction. For the reasons stated in my writing on original submission, I dissent as to the propriety of instructing the trial court to resentence Lane.