Court Opinion

ID: 2751205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-13 22:13:25.765331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:39.739970
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00536-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________

JOEY EDDEEK D/B/A
JOE'S QUICK STOP #2,                                                     Appellant,

                                         v.

WRIGHT FUEL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC,                      Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 445th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Joey Eddeek d/b/a Joe’s Quick Stop #2, attempted to perfect an appeal

from a judgment entered by the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause

number 2012-DCL-7930-I. Judgment in this cause was signed on April 14, 2014.
       Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that an appeal is perfected when

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial

has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is

signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).

       A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in

good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the

fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time.

See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18, 619 (1997) (construing the predecessor

to Rule 26). However, appellant must provide a reasonable explanation for the late filing:

it is not enough to simply file a notice of appeal. Id.; Woodard v. Higgins, 140 S.W.3d
462, 462 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 2004, no pet.); In re B.G., 104 S.W.3d 565, 567 (Tex. App.-

-Waco 2002, no pet.).

       Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal

was due on May 14, 2014, but was not filed until August 19, 2014. On September 19,

2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken

to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal

would be dismissed. Appellant’s counsel filed an opposed motion for extension of time

to cure defect which was granted by the Court, extending appellant’s time to cure defect

until October 29, 2014. No response has been received from appellant.

                                              2
       The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,

appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this

Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a)(c).

                                                 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
13th day of November, 2014.

                                             3