Court Opinion

ID: 9697162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:07:39.703674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:29.695396
License: Public Domain

Boslaugh, J.,
dissenting.
The sentence of the county court that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for 6 months was a valid sentence. The provision that the sentence was ‘‘subject to review in 30 days” was surplusage and of no legal effect. It did not render the otherwise valid sentence partially invalid or erroneous.
The determination by the District Court that the original sentence was valid should have ended the proceeding. There is no provision for an appeal by a defendant in a proceeding under section 29-2317, R. R. S. 1943, because the proceeding has no effect on the rights of a defendant who has been placed in jeopardy. The only provision for a direct review of a judgment in a proceeding under section 29-2317, R. R. S. 1943, is by the prosecuting attorney under sec*341tion 29-2315.01, R. R. S. 1943. § 29-2319 (3), R. R. S. 1943.
White, C. J., and Spencer, J., join in this dissent.