Court Opinion

ID: 9484371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 09:50:53.657551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:11.963024
License: Public Domain

*1285EDITH H. JONES, Judge,
dissenting:
How one should approach issues of a statutory construction arising from the Bankruptcy Code has been clouded, in my view, by Dewsnup v. Timm, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1991). Nevertheless, in reaffirming what I wrote about the “new value exception” in Part IV of the original opinion, and therefore in voting against a rehearing, I would hope to stand with Galileo, who, rebuffed by a higher temporal authority, muttered under his breath, “Eppur si muove.” (“And yet it moves.”)