Court Opinion

ID: 5669012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 13:59:24.849871+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:32.023528
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The defendant began taking water from "the creek about November, 1869. The plaintiff was not permitted to prove that after this date there was less water in the stream during the summer months than before. This was a relevant fact. Its probative force'would depend upon a variety of other facts, like the rainfall of the particular season, to be developed upon cross-examination, or by the examination of other witnesses. For this error of the referee, the order of the general term must be sustained, and a judgment absolute ordered in favor of the plaintiff, witli costs.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.