Court Opinion

ID: 989211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:03:27.162884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.000709
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7805

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LORENZO EDWARD THOMPSON, a/k/a Bay,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
District Judge. (CR-92-302)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Edward Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Boros Major,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his motion for return of seized property. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Thompson, No. CR-92-302 (S.D.W. Va. July
21, 1995; October 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2