Court Opinion

ID: 5720529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:08:50.103156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:41.903261
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Wyoming County Court (Michael F. Griffith, J.), dated June 1, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in assessing a total of 15 points on the risk assessment instrument for failure to accept responsibility. Defendant entered an Alford plea (see North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25 [1970]) to the charge of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]). Defendant thereafter denied that he was guilty of that charge to a counselor at the prison and refused to enter a sex offender treatment program. An Alford plea, coupled with denial of guilt thereafter, is sufficient to establish an offender’s failure to accept responsibility (see People v Matthie, 34 AD3d 987 [2006]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 28 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2006]).
We also reject the further contention of defendant that the court erred in assessing 15 points for his release without supervision. The record contains clear and convincing evidence establishing that defendant served the maximum prison sentence and was released without supervision (see People v Stevenson, 28 AD3d 1248, 1249 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 707; People v Swackhammer, 25 AD3d 892 [2006]). Present—Gorski, J.E, Fahey, Peradotto, Green and Pine, JJ.