Court Opinion

ID: 9518477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:54:05.249731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:17.088365
License: Public Domain

BROAdfoot, J.
{concurring). From the record it is apparent that there must be a new trial as indicated in the opinion. One of the reasons for making the new trial necessary is that the trial court did not submit questions relating to the speed of either driver. I am not certain from the record that attention was paid to the provisions of sec. 85.40 (2) (b), Stats. 1955. Upon the new trial the evi*115dence may be such that jury issues will be presented with reference to the speed of each driver and this might affect the question of the causal negligence of Mrs. Baier in failing to yield the right of way.