Court Opinion

ID: 993176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:03:40.80865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:35.422312
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6844

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

DAVID ANDRE WRIGHT, JR.,

                                           Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District
Judge. (CR-95-152, CA-96-3281-2-11)

Submitted:   September 16, 1997      Decided:   September 29, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Andre Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-95-152; CA-96-3281-2-11
(D.S.C. May 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2