Court Opinion

ID: 9753489
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 19:15:37.234072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:00:31.383866
License: Public Domain

TAMILIA, J.,
Dissenting.
¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the efforts of AmeriPro were interrupted by the initial failure of the prospective employee, Dominic Barrac-chini and appellant/employer, Fleming, to enter an employment agreement. I would find, however, that a quasi-contract to locate a suitable employee for Fleming existed and that despite the elapsed time and breakdown of negotiations in the intervening period, the contract was breached when the parties, introduced by AmeriPro, entered into an employment contract.
¶2 Because Barracchini and Fleming did not meet by happenstance but as a result of the efforts of AmeriPro, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.