Court Opinion

ID: 9941856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-17 21:00:30.956116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:13.325106
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7067      Doc: 15         Filed: 02/16/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-7067

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)

        Submitted: January 18, 2024                                  Decided: February 16, 2024

        Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Fitzgerald Aubin, Assistant
        United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
        Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7067      Doc: 15        Filed: 02/16/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18

        U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and

        find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States

        v. Aigbekaen, No. 1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2 (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2023). We deny his motions for

        bail or release pending appeal and for “all transcripts from the lower court.” We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2