Court Opinion

ID: 817312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-02-01 01:49:29.120304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:15.774685
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

                                            NO . 09-4761

                                 LONNIE G. WATSON , APPELLANT ,

                                                  V.

                                      ERIC K. SHINSEKI,
                          SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

                                       Before HAGEL, Judge.

                                             ORDER

                            Note: Pursuant to U.S. Vet. App. R. 30(a),
                            this action may not be cited as precedent.

        On December 14, 2009, Lonnie G. Watson, who is self-represented, submitted a letter to the
Clerk of the Court inquiring as to the status of a claim that the Court had remanded to the Board of
Veterans' Appeals (Board) on June 30, 2009. The Court interpreted Mr. Watson's letter as a petition
for extraordinary relief. On January 25, 2010, Mr. Watson submitted a motion to withdraw his
petition. In his motion to withdraw, Mr. Watson requested that the Court inform him how long it
would take the Board to process his claim based on the Court's June 2009 remand order.

        In Mr. Watson's January 25, 2010, request to withdraw his petition, he uses the term
"Veterans Law Judge" to refer to both a Board member and a Judge of this court. It is important that
Mr. Watson understand that this Court is an independent Federal Court. 38 U.S.C. § 7251. The
Court is not part of VA, and it is wholly separate from VA and the Board. The Board is that part of
VA that acts on behalf of the Secretary to consider disagreements from claimants that are registered
after regional office decisions. 38 U.S.C. §§ 7101(a), 7104(a). It is also important to make clear that
Judges of this Court are not the same as members of the Board. Congress provided the title
"member" to those individuals assigned to adjudicate appeals for the Secretary. 38 U.S.C.
§ 7101A(a)(1). However, in 2000, VA issued a regulation permitting, but not requiring, members
of the Board to adopt the title "veterans law judge." 38 C.F.R. § 19.2 (2000); see 66 Fed. Reg.
13437. A Judge of this Court is nominated and appointed by the President and confirmed by the
United States Senate. 38 U.S.C. § 7253(b). A member of the Board is nominated and appointed by
the Secretary with the approval of the President.1 38 U.S.C. § 7101A(a)(1). In short, a "veterans law
judge" is an employee of VA, while a Judge of this Court is not.2

       Because, as described above, the Court is not a part of VA, it cannot provide any information
as to how long it will take the Board to process Mr. Watson's appeal. Without any comment
regarding the Board's action, the Court notes, however, that VA regulations permit those who have
appealed to the Board to submit to the Board a request to advance their case on the docket for certain
reasons. See 38 C.F.R. § 20.900(c)(i). Specifically, that regulation provides that a motion for earlier
consideration may be granted if the appellant is "under severe financial hardship." Id.

         Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

       ORDERED that Mr. Watson's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and his December 14,
2009, petition for extraordinary relief is DISMISSED.

DATED: March 1, 2010                                                     BY THE COURT:

                                                                         /s/ Lawrence B. Hagel

                                                                         LAWRENCE B. HAGEL
                                                                         Judge

Copies to:

Lonnie G. Watson

VA General Counsel (027)

         1
         Additionally, individuals may be designated as "acting members of the Board" not subject to any formal
nominating procedures. 38 U.S.C. § 7101(c)(1)(A).

         2
           One further distinction is that Board members are not provided the same independence as appointed and
confirmed Federal Judges, who may only be removed by impeachment or by special order of the President, depending
on the statute creating the Court. Board members' performances are reviewed at least every three years by a three-person
panel comprised of the Chairman and two Board members who are chosen by the Chairman. 38 U.S.C.
§§ 7101A(c)(1)(A), (B). The Chairman establishes the standards for Board members' performances. 38 U.S.C.
§ 7101A(f).

                                                           2