Court Opinion

ID: 6718605
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 22:50:47.004494+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:32.710794
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Epitomized Opinion
Muscarella brought an action in the common pleas to recover damages for breach of a covenant of seizure contained in a deed from defendant to her. The petition did not allege that she had been disturbed in her possession or ousted from the premises. As there was a flaw in the title, the defendant brought an action to quiet title in his own name. Tie court found that the defects were outlawed. All the expenses of this litigation were paid by defendant, and plaintiff suffered no damages whatever by reason of any defect in title. A demurrer was filed to the petition, and sustained. Thereupon the plaintiff prosecuted error. In affirming the judgment of the common pleas it was held:
1. In order to state a cause of action for breach of a covenant of seizure, it is necessary to allege that. the plaintiff hás been disturbed in her possession, or that she has been ousted therefrom, and a failure to make such allegations renders the petition insufficient.