Court Opinion

ID: 9478764
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 06:57:28.568531+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:46:36.459426
License: Public Domain

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it- is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The panel notes that United States v. Corn, 836 F.2d 889 (5th Cir. 1988), relied on by Prince, was a direct appeal, while the present case is a collateral attack. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.