Court Opinion

ID: 716414
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 07:03:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:22.940543
License: Public Domain

81 F.3d 171
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Lee D. WIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FRANCHISE TAX BOARD;  Gerald Goldberg;  Wells Fargo Bank;Cary Curtis;  Delta Dental Of California;  EnolaM. Guillory, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-16297.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 26, 1996.*Decided March 29, 1996.

Before:  GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on June 9, 1995.  See Franchise Tax Bd. v. United States Postal Service, 467 U.S. 512 (1984);  California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982).

3
AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3