Court Opinion

ID: 5284132
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 02:06:41.895779+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:30.877743
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM
Anthony O’Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of murder in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo (2000). He was sentenced to a term of life in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).