Court Opinion

ID: 3127621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 15:44:03.616649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:34.228715
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            No. 04-11-00538-CR

                                      IN RE Alberto Miguel LOPEZ

                                     Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 3, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On July 27, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the

trial court to vacate its order disqualifying appointed counsel George Aristotelidis. However, the

record indicates Aristotelidis was not disqualified, but instead he filed a motion to withdraw as

appointed counsel which was granted by the trial court.

           In a criminal case, in order to be entitled to mandamus relief relator must establish: (1) he

lacks an adequate legal remedy; and (2) the act sought to be compelled is purely ministerial. In

re Reed, 137 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding) (citing State ex

rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)). “‘[A]n

act is ‘ministerial’ if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion.’” Id. (quoting State ex rel.

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-5048, styled State of Texas v. Alberto Miguel Lopez, in the 175th
Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Roman presiding.
                                                                                     04-11-00538-CR

Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist., 67 S.W.3d 177, 180 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)). “It is

generally within the discretion of the trial court whether or not trial counsel should be allowed to

withdraw from a case.” Brewer v. State, 649 S.W.2d 628, 631 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983); See also

Tuffiash v. State, 948 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, writ ref’d). Because the

trial court’s ruling on the motion to withdraw as counsel was a discretionary matter, mandamus

relief is not available. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

                                                                     PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                -2-