Court Opinion

ID: 998855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:17:05.110755+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:10.040345
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

STEPHEN L. SAWYER,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-94-297, CA-96-866-A)

Submitted:   May 25, 1999                   Decided:   June 2, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen L. Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Stephen L. Sawyer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Sawyer, Nos. CR-94-

297; CA-96-866-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 1998).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2