Court Opinion

ID: 2754043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-21 16:08:20.450862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:15.363901
License: Public Domain

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
                                For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool I, LLC v.
                    U.S. Bank, N.A.,   130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
                    that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners
                    association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR
                    Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the
                    disposition of this appeal.

                                                                Parraguirre

                    cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
                         Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd.
                         Brooks Hubley LLP
                         Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                        2
(0) 1947A    aeon