Court Opinion

ID: 629318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 03:21:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:20.525405
License: Public Domain

4 F.3d 985
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Randal Forrest MULLINS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 92-6200.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  June 12, 1992.Decided:  August 19, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Randal Forrest Mullins, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Randal Forrest Mullins seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Sec. 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Mullins v. Murray, No. CA-91-343-N (E.D. Va.  Feb. 3, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED