Court Opinion

ID: 5581489
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:40:36.902074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:05.995013
License: Public Domain

Atkinson, J.
1. On conflicting evidence tliere was no abuse of discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction.
2. No assignment of error based on the admission of evidence in this case requires a new trial.

tJudgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Thomas. Berrien superior court. February 26, 1916.
Hendricks, Mills & Hendricks, for plaintiff.
W. B. Smith, W. D. Buie, and E. X. Wilcox, for defendant.