Court Opinion

ID: 8444021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 20:10:48.388701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:52.249618
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Chad Edwin Langford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Langford’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.