Court Opinion

ID: 8425985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 02:13:46.512444+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:30.950630
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Anthony Payne Siler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Siler v. Bell, No. CA-02-534-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED