Court Opinion

ID: 4244559
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-13 16:00:47.203062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:25.781457
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
               ______________________

          PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
                   Appellant

                          v.

   AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S. LP,
                    Appellee
             ______________________

                2017-1318, 2017-1319
               ______________________

   Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2015-01071, IPR2015-01072.
                ______________________

                    JUDGMENT
               ______________________

   GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC,
argued for appellant.  Also represented by DANIEL
KAZHDAN; CHRISTOPHER J. HARNETT, KEVIN VINCENT
MCCARTHY, New York, NY.

   STEPHANIE DEBROW, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP,
Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by
MARK T. GARRETT; CHARLES BRUCE WALKER, JR., Houston,
TX; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; ALLEN E.
WHITE, Air Liquide, Houston, TX.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 February 13, 2018            /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
       Date                   Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court