Court Opinion

ID: 9383865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-31 15:00:50.457738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:49.285850
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 22-3023                                                September Term, 2022
                                                                   1:20-cr-00195-RBW-1
                                                      Filed On: March 31, 2023
United States of America,

              Appellee

       v.

Jeffrey Henry Williamson,

              Appellant

            ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

       BEFORE:       Pillard, Childs, and Pan, Circuit Judges

                                    JUDGMENT

        This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, the motion for
sanctions and other relief, the motion to appoint special master, the motions for other
relief, and the motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix, it is

      ORDERED that the motions for sanctions and other relief, to appoint special
master, and for other relief be denied. It is

        FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction. Insofar as appellant appeals the district court’s June 3, 2021 order for a
mental health examination and the April 11, 2022 order denying his written objections to
the examination order, the appeal is moot. Any loss of liberty associated with the
examination order has already occurred, see United States v. Weissberger, 951 F.2d
392, 396–97 (D.C. Cir. 1991), and this court therefore can no longer grant effectual
relief consistent with the limited nature of this interlocutory appeal, see Porzecanski v.
Azar, 943 F.3d 472, 479 (D.C. Cir. 2019). Insofar as appellant purports to appeal from
the government’s filing of a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, the district court has not yet
ruled on that motion, and so there is no order to appeal. It is

      FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix
be dismissed as moot.
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 22-3023                                                September Term, 2022

        Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

                                       Per Curiam

                                          Page 2