Court Opinion

ID: 2784785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-03-09 20:01:02.884035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:28:55.204510
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
     for the Federal Circuit
              ______________________

                   March 9, 2015

                    ERRATA
              ______________________

               Appeal No. 2014-1110

     IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA
                PATENT LITIGATION
____________________________________________________

        PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

                         v.

   FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH
    AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as
     Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD
  COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON
  CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP.,
  OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC
    CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita
     Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC
  CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG
  OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
   TECHWIN CO., VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN,
                         LTD.,

             Decided: February 2, 2015
               Precedential Opinion
              _____________________
2                 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION

Please make the following change:

    On page nine, first paragraph, replace the sentence
    Second, it is undisputed that if we reject all five of the
challenged constructions, the summary-judgment orders
must be vacated.2

    with the following sentence:
    Second, it is appropriate, if we reject all five of the
challenged constructions, to vacate the summary-
judgment orders and remand.2

Footnote 2 remains unchanged.