Court Opinion

ID: 9563856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 18:48:24.451369+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:05.868280
License: Public Domain

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,
concurring.
On the specific facts of this case, I agree with the majority’s result. I write separately only to note that this case does not modify the well established rule that a seller may reinstate a time-of-the-essence clause and still be able to declare a default without giving further notice to the buyer that he is in default. See Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc., 260 Or 109, 487 P2d 65 (1971); Salishan Hills Inc. v. Krieger, 62 Or App 84, 660 P2d 160, rev den 295 Or 259 (1983); Crisp v. Hill, 42 Or App 631, 601 P2d 814 (1979). The notice clause in this contract, which was drafted by defendant, required that plaintiff be given notice of any default and that he have 30 days to cure it.