Court Opinion

ID: 4091282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-20 15:48:01.538562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:29.235147
License: Public Domain

People v Rasheem-Coleman (2016 NY Slip Op 06893)

People v Rasheem-Coleman

2016 NY Slip Op 06893

Decided on October 20, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 20, 2016

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Webber, JJ.

1997 2295/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
vAziz Rasheem-Coleman, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Rachel T. Goldberg of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Diane N. Princ of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered October 16, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 20, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.