Court Opinion

ID: 6163631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 18:20:19.384372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:32.782342
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Sections 1406 and 1407 of the Code, regulating the order of preference among execution and attaching creditors, do not apply to eases where choses in action, or equitable interests of the character disclosed herein, are taken under attachment, for the reason that they cannot be levied upon under an execution. Crock. Sher. § 452. The Code prescribes the mode of levying on contract debts or choses in action under process of attachment, (section 648 et seq.,) but contains no such provision for a levy on such interests upon execution, probably for the reason that the judgment creditor has a more summary and effectual remedy by supplementary proceedings to examine the party owing the debt to the debtor, (Code, § 2441,) and by obtaining an order permitting the third person to pay over such debt. to the sheriff, to be applied on account of the execution, (Id. § 2449.) The plaintiff failed to pursue this statutory remedy on his judgment, and the attaching creditors pursued theirs, under sections 648, 649, supra; and, by force of their proceedings, the $339.59 reached the sheriff for their benefit. The execution created no lien on this sum while in the hands of B. J. Dean & Co., and none could be created thereon except under section 2441, which was not put into use by the judgment creditor. The service of the attachments created a lien thereon by force of sections 648, 649, which cannot be divested by the judgment creditor. The money now in the hands of the sheriff is applicable to the attachments under which it was received. The attachments put the fund in his hands, and it cannot be diverted from the purpose for which it was paid in. If the fund in the sheriff’s hands had arisen from a sale of real or personal property of a character that was liable to seizure upon execution as well as upon attachment, a different conclusion might have been arrived at; but as the equitable interest levied upon could not have been taken by the sheriff under the plaintiff’s execution without an order, under section 2449, supra, (Crock. Sher. supra,) it is clear that the money in the hands of the sheriff, derived through an entirely different course of procedure, instituted by others for their benefit, cannot be made to inure to the advantage of the plaintiff. For these reasons the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.