Court Opinion

ID: 9675922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 05:09:53.678301+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:41.364182
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing
The opinion handed down in this case on November 11, 1954, will be amended as follows:
*450■[3] On page 9, beginning with line 12, is a sentence reading: “While we believe appellee’s first counter point is well taken and decisive of this case, however if we be mistaken in that conclusion, we think the evidence and the record in this case will sufficiently support the judgment of the trial court upon some or perhaps all of the theories outlined above in appellee’s second counter point.” This sentence has been changed to read: “While we believe ap-pellee’s first counter point is well taken and decisive of this case, however, if we be mistaken in that conclusion, we think the evidence and the record in this case (under the undisputed facts hereinabove stated in the statement of this case) will sufficiently support the judgment of the trial court upon the theories outlined above in appel-lee’s second counter point.”
Appellant’s motion for findings of fact and conclusions of law is overruled.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.