Court Opinion

ID: 1025545
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:51:38.083713+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:01.562549
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                No. 08-6012

JEWEL LLOYD,

                  Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                  Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00487-JBF-JEB)

Submitted:     April 17, 2008                 Decided: April 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jewel Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Jewel Lloyd appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.    See Lloyd v. Dep’t of Corr.,

No. 2:07-cv-00487-JBF-JEB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2007; entered

Nov. 16, 2007).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                            AFFIRMED

                               - 2 -