Court Opinion

ID: 5943576
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 05:54:01.080324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:20.988579
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered March 22, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s sole claim is that a police chemist who qualified as an expert should not have been allowed to testify as to the weight of the cocaine seized since a proper foundation had not been laid for the admission of the testimony. Because the defendant did not object to the expert’s testimony on this ground or otherwise raise this claim at trial, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v De La Rosa, 162 AD2d 698). We decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.