Court Opinion

ID: 1254925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:14:31.325568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:43.661940
License: Public Domain

320 S.E.2d 25 (1984)
Helen Susan FRANCE
v.
WINN-DIXIE SUPERMARKET, INC.
No. 8317SC1185.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
September 18, 1984.
Franklin Smith, Elkin, for plaintiff-appellant.
Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready by G. Gray Wilson and Penni L. Pearson, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.
WHICHARD, Judge.
A store owner does not insure customers against slipping and falling. To hold the owner liable, plaintiff must show that defendant either (1) negligently created the condition causing the injury, or (2) negligently failed to correct the condition after actual or constructive notice of its existence. Hinson v. Cato's, Inc., 271 N.C. 738, 157 S.E.2d 537 (1967).
Plaintiff here made no attempt to show that defendant either created or knew of the slippery condition caused by the broken pickle jar and puddle of juice on its floor. Instead, she presented evidence that another customer, who had been in the store fifteen or twenty minutes and was checking out when plaintiff entered, had seen the broken pickle jar on the floor before plaintiff fell. The customer did not say exactly when he observed the pickle jar. From this evidence the jury could only speculate as to how long the pickle juice had been on the floor and as to whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. Under these circumstances, a directed verdict for defendant was appropriate. Hinson, supra.
Our decision on the directed verdict issue renders discussion of plaintiff's other assignment of error unnecessary.
Affirmed.
ARNOLD and EAGLES, JJ., concur.