Court Opinion

ID: 63656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 05:00:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:21.381522
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   **
  

  Plaintiff-Appellant Arnulfo Andres Lopez (“Lopez”) appeals from a December 13, 2006, 2006 WL 3702895 Memorandum
   
   *356
   
  Opinion and Order of the District Court and an April 11, 2007, 2007 WL 1108736, Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District Court. Together, these orders granted summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees and dismissed all of Lopez’s federal law claims and all of Lopez’s state law claims except for one state law malicious prosecution claim, which the District Court remanded to state court. We have reviewed the briefs, the entire record on appeal, and the applicable law and have heard oral arguments of counsel. Finding no error in the District Court’s disposition of the case, we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its written opinions.
 

   **
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
    
    *356
    
   published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.