Court Opinion

ID: 9673342
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:10:22.460248+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:27:30.442025
License: Public Domain

Krivosha, C. J.,
concurring in the result.
I concur in the result reached by the majority in this case. I write separately, however, because I believe that any reference to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-404(2) (Cum. Supp. 1984) is misplaced. The evidence in this case with regard to other claims made by the appellant and paid by various companies was inadmissible because the evidence was irrelevant under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 1979). There was no issue as to whether the evidence could have been offered to show motive under § 27-404(2). It could not.
Caporale and Shanahan, JJ., join in this concurrence.