Court Opinion

ID: 988578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:54:27.272327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:24.992900
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7282

CHARLES GENE ROGERS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

M. A. MUNNS, Sergeant; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN,
JR.; GARY DIXON; TED PERRY,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-93-435)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 22, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Rogers v. Munns, No. CA-93-435 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2