Court Opinion

ID: 4083152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-07 23:44:57.007845+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:03:38.435011
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

638
CA 13-01521
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

                     V                                              ORDER

ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE
VISUALLY IMPAIRED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP.,
DEFENDANT.
------------------------------------------------
ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE
VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,

                     V

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
(APPEAL NO. 1.)

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLY S. BRAUN OF
COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (ANDREW O. MILLER OF
COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy
J. Walker, A.J.), entered May 15, 2013. The order, among other
things, granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking summary
judgment against defendant Elizabeth Pierce Olmstead, M.D. Center for
the Visually Impaired.

     It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed
without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR
5501 [a] [1]).

Entered:   June 20, 2014                           Frances E. Cafarell
                                                   Clerk of the Court