Court Opinion

ID: 8448025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:43:04.560386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.808334
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2 (WD.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.