Court Opinion

ID: 9825322
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:36:26.073546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:41.595717
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
It is urged on application for rehearing that charges “B” and “D” were probably refused for the reason that they used the word “mortgage” instead of “retention title contract”. In passing upon these charges originally, the Court failed to draw the distinction between “retention title contract” and “mortgage”.
The undisputed evidence is that the written’ contract, introduced in evidence and the basis of plaintiff”s title, is not a mortgage but is a retention title contract. That being the case, the court cannot be put in error for refusing charges “B” and “D”. Carter v. Gaines, 204 Ala. 640, 87 So. 109.
The judgment of reversal is set aside. Rehearing is granted.
The judgment is affirmed.