Court Opinion

ID: 999988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:33:37.133337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:22.993976
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6680

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CURNAL WESTON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-98-107, CA-98-730-3)

Submitted:   September 14, 1999           Decided:   October 14, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curnal Weston, Appellant Pro Se.    N. George Metcalf, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Curnal Weston seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)

and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Weston, Nos. CR-98-

107, CA-98-730-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 6 & 16, 1999).    We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2