Court Opinion

ID: 677960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:25:24+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:16.152605
License: Public Domain

35 F.3d 555
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William Alan DUARTE, Petitioner Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent Appellee.
No. 93-7137.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 29, 1994.Decided Sept. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  James R. Spencer, District Judge.  (CA-92-555).
Carlos Marco Recio, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Duarte v. Murray, No. CA-92-555 (E.D. Va.  Sept. 23, 1993).  We also deny Appellant's motion to schedule oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.