Court Opinion

ID: 2962992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:04:35.849346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:38.305412
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ____________________        No. 93-2156                                              EDWIN SANCHEZ,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________        No. 93-2157                                   RAFAEL SANCHEZ,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                   ________________                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                   [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________                                  _________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Edwin Sanchez on brief pro se.
            _____________            Cheryl J. Sturm on brief for appellant Rafael Sanchez.
            _______________            Donald  K. Stern,  United States  Attorney, and  Heidi E. Brieger,
            ________________                                 ________________        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                  November 29, 1994                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   The  district court's  denial of  the
                      __________            motions to  vacate sentence under  28 U.S.C.   2255  filed by            appellants  Edwin  and  Rafael Sanchez  is  affirmed  for the
                                                        ________            reasons stated  in the  district court's  September 14,  1993            memorandum and order.                                         -2-