Court Opinion

ID: 3193537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-13 14:02:41.439953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:08.819659
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                             IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                             OF FLORIDA

                                             SECOND DISTRICT

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE                  )
CORPORATION,                                 )
                                             )
              Appellant,                     )
                                             )
v.                                           )       Case No. 2D14-4183
                                             )
NIURKA SIMONEAU and JORGE L.                 )
PEREZ,                                       )
                                             )
              Appellees.                     )
                                             )

Opinion filed April 13, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Bernard C. Silver,
Judge.

Kara Berard Rockenbach and Lauren J.
Smith of Methe & Rockenbach, P.A.,
West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Aaron S. Kling of Smith, Kling &
Thompson, P.A., for Appellees.

CRENSHAW, Judge.

              Citizens Property Insurance Corporation challenges a final judgment for

money damages entered in favor of its insureds, Niurka Simoneau and Jorge L. Perez,

following a jury trial after Citizens conceded the existence of sinkhole activity—a
covered loss under the insurance contract—but disputed the necessary method of

subsurface repair. In the sole issue on appeal, Citizens argues that the trial court erred

in denying its motion to require the insureds to enter into a contract for subsurface

repairs before entering a money judgment. We agree. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v.

Amat, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D448, D450 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 19, 2016) ("Based on the jury's

finding of coverage, the trial court was obligated to enforce the contract, including the

policy's restrictions on Citizens' obligations to pay for the cost of the repair for

subsurface damages."); see also Tower Hill Select Ins. Co. v. McKee, 151 So. 3d 2, 4

(Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("Because the insurance policy contained a loss settlement

provision tracking the language of section 627.707(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), Tower

Hill had the authority to withhold payment for subsurface repairs until McKee entered

into a contract for those repairs."), reh'g granted (Oct. 27, 2014), review denied, 163 So.
3d 511 (Fla. 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment to the extent that it

awarded money damages for subsurface repairs without requiring the insureds to enter

into a contract for those repairs. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects.

              Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

                                             -2-