Court Opinion

ID: 3130202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 16:41:38.979509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:31.773401
License: Public Domain

i          i      i                                                                 i     i      i

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                         No. 04-10-00445-CR

                                            Andres PENA,
                                              Appellant

                                                   v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                      From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 2009-CR-7295
                           Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                  Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 21, 2010

DISMISSED

           Andres Pena pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of felon in possession of a firearm

pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea bargain, Pena signed a separate “Waiver

of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of

appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Pena timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record,
                                                                                       04-10-00445-CR

which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been

filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows

the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

       The court gave Pena notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court

certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within thirty

days. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio

2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d)

(not designated for publication). Pena’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response, stating

she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and

counsel’s notice, we agree that Pena does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d
610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine

whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX . R. APP . P.

25.2(d).

                                                        PER CURIAM

Do not publish

                                                  -2-