Court Opinion

ID: 7184100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:50:53.392314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:00.866258
License: Public Domain

Slidell, O. J.
As to the contest between Eepburn and the liquidator, we see no reason to change the conclusion to which we came, after alaborate argument in McKneely v. Brown, decided in April, 1854.
Due notice, in 1840, to Norwood, of the assignment to Hepburn, is proved ; and, after notice, Nonoood could not acquire obligations of the assignor, and set them up in compensation to the detriment of the assignee.
-Judgment affirmed ; the costs of appeal to he paid by the appellant.