Court Opinion

ID: 8150650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:32:07.255456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:35.433065
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317).