Court Opinion

ID: 9570342
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:22:25.827566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:25.942445
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant argues vigorously on motion for rehearing that this court should accept jurisdiction of this appeal by a liberal construction of the rules of appellate procedure. See Gillen v. Bostick, 234 Ga. 308, 310-311 (215 SE2d 676). Unfortunately for appellant, we are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court cited in the opinion. In view of those decisions and of the very different procedural context of Wall v.C&S Bank of Houston County, 153 Ga. App. 29 (264 SE2d 523), we do not feel compelled by the result in Wall to extend the ruling in Gillen in conflict with the above-cited Supreme Court decisions.

Motion for rehearing denied.