Court Opinion

ID: 15324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 06:43:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:11.898919
License: Public Domain

151 F.3d 291
Delbert Boyd TEAGUE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,v.Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of CriminalJustice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-10878.
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 14, 1998.

Robert Franklin Ford, Fort Worth, TX, Robert Patrick Abbott, Coppell, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Erik E. Cary, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1
Delbert Boyd Teague, a Texas death penalty candidate, has moved this court to stay his execution, currently scheduled for September 9, 1998, pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.  Lacking jurisdiction to enter such an order, we dismiss Teague's motion.

2
In Teague v. Johnson, 144 F.3d 50 (5th Cir.1998) (unpublished), we affirmed the district court's denial of Teague's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.  The appellate mandate issued on May 22.  Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2251, only "[a] Justice or Judge of the United States before whom a habeas petition is pending, may . . . stay a[] proceeding against the person detained."   As we recently attempted to make clear, see  Williams v. Cain, 143 F.3d 949, 950 & n.1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 2338, 141 L.Ed.2d 710 (1998), once the appellate mandate issues, a habeas petition is no longer pending before the court of appeals, and we have no jurisdiction to stay proceedings under § 2251.  In this situation, if a petitioner desires a stay of execution pending disposition of a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, he simply must seek that stay in the Supreme Court itself.  Id.

3
MOTION DISMISSED.