Court Opinion

ID: 5407107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:03:11.311591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:38.240556
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

This action was brought in the Municipal Court to recover damages for personal injuries, and was tried before a justice of that court and a jury, which found a verdict for the plaintiff for $204.04.
This appeal is taken from the judgment entered upon such verdict.
Upon the trial counsel for the defendant requested the court to charge the jury as follows:
“ Inasmuch as the burden of proving the negligence on the part of the defendant and freedom from negligence on the part of the plaintiff rests upon the plaintiff, if the evidence in the case is *204evenly balanced, the verdict of the jury must be for the defendant.” To this request the justice responded, “ I refuse to charge that in that way ” and the defendant’s counsel excepted. This was clearly error and prejudicial to the defendant. Brockman v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 32 Misc. Rep. 728. As the subject of this request was not alluded to in the colloquial charge, the judgment must be reversed.
Present: Andrews, P. J., O’Gorman and Blanchard, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.