Court Opinion

ID: 9900760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-20 13:08:28.94891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:17.362309
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued November 14, 2023

                                       In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The

                           First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00674-CV
                            ———————————
      IN RE YELLOWJACKET OILFIELD SERVICES, LLC, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator, Yellowjacket Oilfield Services LLC, has filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus, challenging the trial court’s August 11, 2023 order denying its Motion

for New Trial and to Vacate the Partial and Interlocutory Default Judgment.1

1
      The underlying case is Latoria Lynn Harlan, as Next Friend of D.A.H.J., a Minor
      Child, Ronald D. Lee, as Representative of The Estate Of Diamond Jarvis Jefferson,
      Deceased, and Timothy Holbert v. Lone Star Well Service, LLC, Point Energy
      Partners Operating, LLC, Allegiance Crane & Equipment LLC, Yellowjacket
      Oilfield Services, LLC, Graco Fishing & Rental Tools, Inc., Crescent Consulting,
      LLC, Rig Works, Inc., and Consolidated Wellsite Services, LLC, Cause No.
      Relator has now filed a Motion to Dismiss its petition for writ of mandamus,

stating that the trial court “has set aside the [August 11, 2023] [o]rder that [wa]s the

basis of [its] petition for writ of mandamus . . . [a]nd [a]s a result, [its] petition is

moot.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion does not include a certificate

of conference, but more than ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and

no party has opposed the relief requested in the motion.2 See TEX. R. APP. P.

10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

      Accordingly, we grant relator’s motion and dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

                                    PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

      2023-02980, in the 295th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable
      Donna Roth presiding.
2
      Although relator titled its motion, “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of
      Mandamus,” the motion is not signed by real parties in interest and does not include
      a certificate of conference stating that real parties in interest are unopposed to the
      relief sought in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5).

                                            2