Court Opinion

ID: 2962349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:56:44.11766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:17.360444
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          February 18, 1994                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-2171                                  ROBERT J. GALLAGHER,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                        FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                            Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.                                           ______________                                 ____________________            Robert J. Gallagher on brief pro se.            ___________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per   Curiam.       Appellant   has    no   federal                      ____________            constitutional right  to appellate  review of  a state  lower            court decision.  McKane v. Durston, 153 U.S. 684, 687 (1894).                             ______    _______            Regardless whether  or not  the New  Hampshire Supreme  Court            chooses to review a state court ruling, lower  federal courts            lack  jurisdiction  to  review state  court  decisions.   The            dismissal of appellant's  action is affirmed for  the reasons            stated in the magistrate's August 17, 1993 report.                      Affirmed.                      ________