Court Opinion

ID: 998049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:05:39.136054+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:49.786589
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-7653

HUEY LEE BILLUPS,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

G. L. WOODARD;      ATTORNEY   GENERAL   OF   NORTH
CAROLINA,

                                                Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-36-3-MU)

Submitted:   February 25, 1999                 Decided:   March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Huey Lee Billups, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.    See Billups v. Woodard, No. CA-97-36-3-MU

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1998).   We deny Appellant’s motions to appoint

counsel and to amend.    We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2