Court Opinion

ID: 298149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:49:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:14.360553
License: Public Domain

446 F.2d 224
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,v.Edward Elmer DIXON, Appellant.
No. 71-1134.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM:

1
The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation.  But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

2
As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement.  United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

3
Louis L. Deckter (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.

4
Stanley L. Patchell (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.