Court Opinion

ID: 9710894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:19:51.126838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:00.854517
License: Public Domain

Clinton, J.,
concurring in result.
I concur in the result. The trial court should have set aside its judgment determining the status of the deed to Warren Bruce Dorland. The only service on Dorland was constructive notice of a mortgage foreclosure. The court had no jurisdiction to try issues of which Dorland had no constructive notice. The guardian ad litem had no power or authority to expand the issues by joining issue with Cetha Floy Dorland when she sought to expand the issues in her answer. Walker v. Sanchez, 13 La. An. Rep. 505; *368Waterman v. Lawrence, 19 Cal. 210, 79 Am. Dec. 212.
Spencer, J., joins in this concurrence.