Court Opinion

ID: 4211278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-12 16:20:54.635792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:41:17.352039
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                     EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                  '

                                                  '               No. 08-17-00203-CV
  IN RE: JIMMY LEE SWEED,
                                                  '         AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                                Relator.
                                                  '                IN MANDAMUS
                                                  '

                                                  '

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Relator, Jimmy Lee Sweed, has filed a mandamus petition asking that we issue the writ of

mandamus against the Honorable Linda Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso

County, Texas. Relator requests that we order Respondent to file his civil suit against the City of

El Paso. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

       To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First,

the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136.

       On February 20, 2008, the 210th District Court determined that Relator is a vexatious

litigant and entered a pre-filing order pursuant to Section 11.101 of the Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 11.101 (West 2017); see also Sweed v.
Nye, 319 S.W.3d 791 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, pet. denied)(affirming vexatious litigant order).

Under Section 11.102, a vexatious litigant is prohibited from filing, pro se, new litigation in a court

to which the order applies without seeking the permission of the local administrative judge of the

type of court in which the vexatious litigant intends to file. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN.

§ 11.102. Additionally, the pre-filing order required Relator to deposit $5,000 into the registry of

the court as a pre-condition to filing any new suit. Relator’s petition reflects that he personally

appeared before Respondent and requested that she file his civil suit. The procedure he employed

is contrary to the pre-filing order and the requirements of Section 11.102. Finding that Relator has

failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

October 11, 2017
                                       ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

                                                 -2-