Court Opinion

ID: 9646539
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:02:23.683323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:39.128695
License: Public Domain

Ernie E. Wright, Chief Judge, dissenting. Í respectfully dissent. There was no showing that the hospital records offered in evidence by the appellant were relevant to the issues or that appellant was prejudiced by the action of the court in sustaining the objection to the offer of the records. In my view the trial court acted within its discretion in admitting the testimony of Dr. Johnson. Dr. Johnson testified as to the injuries to Tina Randolph arising from the motor vehicle accident and that the injuries caused her death. The evidence was relevant, competent and a proper consideration for the jury. The testimony was not inflammatory, and no objection was made that the testimony was prejudicial. I would affirm.