Court Opinion

ID: 2223017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:40:52.681457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:17.590130
License: Public Domain

44 Mich. App. 567 (1973)
205 N.W.2d 599
PEOPLE
v.
WARREN.
Docket No. 11337.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided February 20, 1973.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, Donald A. Kuebler, Chief, Appellate Division, and Martin F. Palus, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Bruce E. Doll, for defendant on appeal.
Before: BRONSON, P.J., and McGREGOR and DANHOF, JJ.
DANHOF, J.
This is an appeal of a first-degree-murder conviction. MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548. *568 The defendant was convicted under a felony-murder theory and on appeal he contends that the felony-murder rule can have no application to the facts of this case. We affirm the conviction.
On April 21, 1970, the defendant and two others went to the home of a third party ostensibly to purchase a bottle of cough syrup. After the defendant entered the house he announced, "This is a stick-up." The intended victim and one of the defendant's companions began to struggle, and the defendant produced a revolver and fired a number of shots at the two men. The defendant's companion died as a result of the wounds suffered in this incident.
On appeal the defendant contends that the felony-murder rule has no application to a case where the deceased is a co-felon, relying on Commonwealth v Redline, 391 Pa 486; 137 A2d 472 (1958), and People v Austin, 370 Mich. 12 (1963). Redline was a case where a co-felon was killed by a policeman's bullet. In Austin a co-felon was killed by the intended victim. The distinction between those cases and the case at bar is immediately apparent. In the case at bar the killing was done by the defendant.
The cases that have expanded and refined the Redline doctrine have made it clear that the doctrine has no application when the actual killing is done by the defendant. Commonwealth ex rel Smith v Myers, 438 Pa 218; 261 A2d 550 (1970), People v Washington, 62 Cal 2d 777; 44 Cal Rptr 442; 402 P2d 130 (1965). See also LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 71, pp 545-561. In Robbins v People, 142 Colo 254; 350 P2d 818 (1960), the Supreme Court of Colorado was confronted with the same issue presented by this case, and the *569 Court held the felony-murder rule to be applicable. We also do so.
Affirmed.
All concurred.