Court Opinion

ID: 994276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:20:32.589244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:18.487912
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.                                                                     No. 97-6956

LEROY BOONE,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge.
(CR-90-149-N, CA-96-372-2)

Submitted: February 10, 1998

Decided: February 25, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Leroy Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Alberi, Special Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Boone appeals from the district court's order dismissing
without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.§ 2255 (1994)
(current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)).
The district court found that before Boone could file a successive
§ 2255 motion, he must obtain authorization from this court to do so.
Because we find that authorization is not required, we vacate and
remand.

Boone filed a successive § 2255 motion on April 8, 1996, raising
six claims. He then filed an addendum on April 25, 1996, contending
that his conviction for using and carrying a firearm should be over-
turned in light of Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995). Boone
filed his § 2255 motion before April 24, 1996 (the effective date of
the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.
No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("AEDPA")). Moreover, the envelope in
which Boone mailed the addendum bears a postmark of April 23,
1996. Under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the addendum is
deemed filed when Boone handed it to prison officials for mailing--
before the AEDPA's effective date. See Burns v. Morton, ___ F.3d
___, ___, 1998 WL 15128, at *4 (3d Cir. 1998). Because authoriza-
tion from this court is not required, see Breard v. Pruett, ___ F.3d
___, ___, 1998 WL 19920, at *2 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that pre-
AEDPA law applies if habeas corpus proceeding filed before
AEDPA's effective date) (citing Howard v. Moore , 131 F.3d 399, 403
(4th Cir. 1997) (en banc)), we vacate the district court's order and
remand for further proceedings.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

                    2