Court Opinion

ID: 4660182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-02-15 08:22:14.006491+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:04.511116
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-92,138-01

                       EX PARTE JACOB JOEL RAMIREZ, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. A13722-1 IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM KERR COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that he is being denied due process because he is being held pursuant to

a parole revocation warrant but no parole revocation proceedings have been initiated. He states that

he has been in custody on the revocation warrant for over 100 days but the Board of Pardons and

Paroles has not held a revocation hearing, and he has not been charged with a new offense.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX . GOV 'T CODE, § 508.2811;

Ex parte Cordova, 235 S.W.3d 735, 736 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Accordingly, the record should
                                                                                                       2

be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of

the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).

        The response shall state whether Applicant is being held pursuant to a parole revocation

warrant, and if so, the date upon which that warrant was executed. The response shall state whether

Applicant has been advised of his rights in the revocation process, whether he has requested or

waived a preliminary hearing and whether he has been afforded a preliminary hearing. If Applicant

is also being held on new charges, the response shall state whether Applicant has been indicted on

those charges, and if so, when the indictment was returned.

        It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. However, if the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is represented by counsel. If Applicant is not

represented by counsel, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

is receiving due process in the parole revocation proceedings. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
                                                                                                 3

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 10, 2021
Do not publish