Court Opinion

ID: 3253641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:23:55.241486+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:06.714202
License: Public Domain

The rulings of the court on the admission of testimony were patently free from error.
The argument of the solicitor, to which exception was taken was legitimate.
Refused charge 2 omits the doctrine of retreat. Refused charge 3 was the general charge, and refused charge 4 invades the province of the jury. They were all properly refused. Jones v. State, 20 Ala. App. 660, 104 So. 771; Tatum v. State,20 Ala. App. 436, 102 So. 726.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.