Court Opinion

ID: 8482120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-07 19:00:30.803019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:36.781906
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10531     Document: 00516535926         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/07/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                  No. 22-10531                       November 7, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Samantha Denise Rodriguez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-10

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Samantha Denise Rodriguez has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10531     Document: 00516535926          Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/07/2022

                                   No. 22-10531

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2