Court Opinion

ID: 7735835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:52:49.640658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:26.003950
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the denial of his postconviction motion, which raised a facially sufficient claim under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied the motion because the appellant was sentenced to a negotiated term. However, the court failed to attach a copy of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for attachments which refute the appellant’s claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.