Court Opinion

ID: 2754251
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-21 21:01:40.663927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:57.028406
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 14-635V
                                     Filed: October 16, 2014

****************************
LINDA HAFT,                *
                           *
              Petitioner,  *                                Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
                           *                                Influenza Vaccine or Flu Vaccine;
                           *                                Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *                                Administration; SIRVA
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
              Respondent.  *
                           *
****************************

                                     RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

       On July 21, 2014, Linda Haft filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the “Vaccine
Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury which was
caused in fact by the influenza vaccine she received on October 17, 2013. Petition at 1.
The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

        On October 16, 2014, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report [“Res. Report”] in
which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Res. Report
at 1. Specifically, respondent indicates “that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with
a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and that it was caused in
fact by the flu vaccine she received on October 17, 2013.” Id. at 4. Respondent agrees
that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months and that no other causes for
petitioner’s injury can be identified. Id.

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to
post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
       In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that
petitioner is entitled to compensation.

                               s/Denise K. Vowell
                               Denise K. Vowell
                               Chief Special Master

                                        2