Court Opinion

ID: 9573901
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:00:19.789156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:38.572851
License: Public Domain

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice
(concurring specially).
I concur in this opinion affirming the trial court’s denial of the motion to vacate the judgment under Rule 60(b), N.D.R. Civ.P., for the reasons stated therein, but in so doing, I do not wish to be understood as in any way affirming the opinion of Justices Teigen, Vogel, and Knudson reported at 215 N.W.2d 897 (N.D.1974) which I still believe to be in error.
PAULSON, J., concurs.