Court Opinion

ID: 1630117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:58:32.775011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:29.479669
License: Public Domain

32 So. 3d 748 (2010)
C.B., Mother of N.F., A.F., and E.F., Children, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Nos. 5D09-2485, 5D09-2486, 5D09-2487.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 20, 2010.
Nickole E. Frederick, Orlando, for Appellant.
Ward L. Metzger, of Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
C.B., the mother, appeals the orders terminating her parental rights to her five children. We affirm in all respects, save one. As the Department of Children and Families (DCF) concedes, the trial court *749 erred by terminating the mother's parental rights as to N.F. based on multiple out-of-home care placements, as set forth in section 39.806(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2008). This ground was not pled as a basis for termination in the petition and DCF failed to seek amendment of the petition to include this statutory ground as to N.F. See R.S. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 872 So. 2d 412, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Despite this error, the court properly terminated the mother's parental rights as to all five children as other grounds supporting termination were adequately established. See J.C. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 959 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that despite error in termination order, which incorrectly included abandonment as basis for termination, termination order would still stand where DCF established two other grounds supporting termination).
On remand, the trial court shall strike this finding. In all other respects, the termination orders are affirmed.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
MONACO, C.J., ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.