Court Opinion

ID: 179171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-11-12 18:45:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:06.856849
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 09-8072

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

NATHAN LEE FOSTER, a/k/a Plum,

                Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:03-cr-00319-F-1)

Submitted:   October 21, 2010             Decided:   November 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Lee Foster, Appellant Pro Se.   Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Nathan Lee Foster appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.        United States v. Foster, No. 5:03-cr-00319-F-1

(E.D.N.C. July 17, 2009).         We deny Foster’s motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions    are   adequately   presented    in   the    materials

before   the   court    and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                     2