Court Opinion

ID: 224559
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:26:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:04.438209
License: Public Domain

180 F.2d 592
50-1 USTC  P 9229
UNITED STATES,v.ALL AMERICAN AIRWAYS, Inc.
No. 12347.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1950.Rehearing Denied April 4, 1950.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slcak, Harry Marselli, and Irving I. Axelrad, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Ernest A. Tolin, U.S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal. for the United States.
Guthrie, Darling & Shattuck, Los Angeles, Cal.  (Hale, Stimson & Russell, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
This appeal is from a consent judgment- a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render.  Such a judgment is not reversible.  Pacific R.R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L. Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L. Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8.  See also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S. Ct. 460, 28 L. Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S. Ct. 311, 72 L. Ed. 587.  The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.