Court Opinion

ID: 3192518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-08 15:01:16.841313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:18.588247
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                   OSRAM GMBH,
                     Appellant

                           v.

                E. FRED SCHUBERT,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                      2015-1620
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-
00459.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston,
MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM
M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC.

   DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M.
BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON;
JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA.
    THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT
WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 8, 2016                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
   Date                       Daniel E. O’Toole
                              Clerk of Court