Court Opinion

ID: 9474961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 05:13:22.051124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:44:25.539703
License: Public Domain

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge,
dissenting:
Were this case properly before us, I would join Judge Johnson’s opinion. I agree with Judge Johnson that the majority’s opinion endorses disturbingly arbitrary guidelines for limiting access to the federal courts. I concur in Judge Tjoflat’s procedural analysis, however, that the case is not properly before us at this time; accordingly, I join in his dissent. If, in the future, the clerk of the Middle District of Florida, pursuant to that court’s injunction, should refuse to file another Procup pro se petition, Procup then could challenge the injunction by petitioning for a writ of mandamus pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 21(a). At such time, the case properly would be before this court for determination on the merits.