Court Opinion

ID: 8447598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:30:21.516672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.454781
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00081-D (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2011). We deny Richardson’s motion for relief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.