Court Opinion

ID: 9387568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-18 15:00:54.562498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:14.382821
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-2263    Document: 69           Page: 1       Filed: 04/18/2023

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

                         April 18, 2023

                        ERRATA
                  ______________________

 Appeal Nos. 2021-2263, 2021-2264, 2021-2265, 2021-2266

           SEQUOIA TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
                Plaintiff-Appellant

                                  v.

  DELL, INC., DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., EMC
   CORPORATION, AKA DELL EMC, HEWLETT-
 PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO., HITACHI VANTARA
 CORPORATION, SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC.,
                HITACHI LTD.,
               Defendants-Appellees

           -------------------------------------------------

                    Appeal No. 2021-2267

                    RED HAT, INC.,
        Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee

                                  v.

           SEQUOIA TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
       Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant

   ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Case: 21-2263     Document: 69      Page: 2    Filed: 04/18/2023

 2                      SEQUOIA TECHNOLOGY, LLC    v. DELL, INC.

                 RESEARCH INSTITUTE,
                   Defendant-Appellant

                               v.

       INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
                  CORPORATION,
            Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee
                ______________________

     Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-02027-LPS-CJB, Judge
 Leonard P. Stark.
                  ______________________

                   Decided: April 12, 2023
                    Precedential Opinion
                   ______________________

 Please make the following change:
     On page 15, footnote 5, change “The district court did
 rely on this extrinsic evidence, see Decision, 2021 WL
 2010448, at *3,” to “The district court did not explicitly rely
 on this extrinsic evidence, see Decision, 2021 WL 2010448,
 at *3–4”