Court Opinion

ID: 9853642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:51:30.564933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:56.988307
License: Public Domain

Andersen, A.C.J.
(concurring in the result) — The central issue in this case is not which of two insurance companies should pay, but whether Insurance Company of North America (INA) can properly deny coverage for the loss under its yacht insurance policy. The injured party had been a passenger on the yacht. At the time of his injury, he was engaged in assisting another person to alight from the yacht. His bodily injury claim was therefore within the coverage of INA's yacht insurance policy covering claims or damage "arising from or occasioned by any of the following *822matters or things during the currency of this policy in respect of the yacht hereby insured, that is to say: . . . bodily injury ..."
Reconsideration denied September 6, 1978.
Review denied by Supreme Court February 2, 1979.