Court Opinion

ID: 4279863
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-31 14:10:10.697302+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:52:27.218946
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                          No. 1D17-3013
                  _____________________________

DAISY RICHARDS, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
James E. Hurd, Jr., Deceased,

    Appellant,

    v.

JAMES E. RISH,

    Appellee.
                  _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County.
John L. Fishel, II, Judge.

                           May 31, 2018

PER CURIAM.

     Appellant appeals a Final Judgment entered in Appellee’s
favor on several claims, including unjust enrichment, arising from
an unenforceable oral contract for the sale of real property. We
agree with Appellant that the trial court’s determination that
equity did not compel repayment of funds paid to Appellee is
unsupported by the evidence. See Golden v. Woodward, 15 So. 3d
664, 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that an unjust enrichment
action exists to prevent “‘the wrongful retention of a benefit, or the
retention of money or property of another, in violation of good
conscience and fundamental principles of justice or equity’”
(citation omitted)); see also Cole Taylor Bank v. Shannon, 772 So.
2d 546, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (applying the competent,
substantial evidence standard of review in reviewing a trial court’s
ruling in favor of a defendant in an unjust enrichment action). We,
therefore, reverse the Final Judgment on the issue of unjust
enrichment and remand with directions that the trial court enter
judgment in Appellant’s favor on that claim.

    REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

George V. Matlock, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James E. Rish, pro se, Appellee.

                                   2