Court Opinion

ID: 9393436
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-10 14:00:40.426183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:53.256254
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-12253    Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 05/10/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-12253
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       WAYNE LEE JOHNSON,
       a.k.a. Wayne Johnson,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00242-WFJ-AEP-1
USCA11 Case: 22-12253      Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 05/10/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-12253

                            ____________________

       Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Laura Daines, appointed counsel for Wayne Lee Johnson,
       has moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared
       under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson filed a re-
       sponse to his counsel’s motion, requesting the appointment of new
       appellate counsel. Our independent review of the entire record re-
       veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
       correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re-
       veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
       GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences are
       AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Johnson’s motion to appoint new coun-
       sel is DENIED.