Court Opinion

ID: 8425096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 01:18:41.545905+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:29.717280
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Danny G. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Gintoli, No. CA-03-1102-9-24 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED