Court Opinion

ID: 9382422
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-27 18:00:17.946411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:39.323285
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10867         Document: 00516689500             Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/27/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10867
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                                March 27, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Michael Angelo Vasquez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:20-CR-359-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Angelo
   Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasquez has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10867    Document: 00516689500          Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/27/2023

                                  No. 22-10867

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                           2