Court Opinion

ID: 9733612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:11:50.18644+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:44.917788
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00172-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

RICHARD SMITH,                                                            Appellant,

                                           v.

CORPUS RIVERSQUARE I LP,                            Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                  Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña
                  Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

      Appellant filed a notice of appeal on May 3, 2023. On May 12, 2023, the Clerk of

the Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal was defective and did not comply

with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b), 9.5(e), 25.1(d), and 25.1(e) and that a

$205.00 filing fee was due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 25.1
       On June 9, 2023, the Clerk of this Court again notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if a filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the

notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). On July 28, 2023, the Clerk of this Court again

notified appellant of the defects in his notice of appeal; the Clerk of the Court notified

appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the defects were not corrected, or the

filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of the letter. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

        On August 7, 2023, each of the clerk’s notices were returned undeliverable and

marked “return to sender” and “not deliverable as addressed” and “unable to forward.”

       Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign

any document filed and “give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax number,

if any, and email address.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b). The clerk’s office does not have a

telephone number for appellant, and the district clerk did not have any additional contact

information for the appellant.

       Furthermore, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 permits an appellate court,

on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties, to dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution or for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See

id. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3.

                                                                       JAIME TIJERINA
                                                                       Justice

Delivered and filed on the
24th day of August, 2023.

                                             2