Court Opinion

ID: 8454147
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:54:03.950914+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.281318
License: Public Domain

*519Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark S. Bufford, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bufford, No. 4:07-cr-00066-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 27 & entered Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.