Court Opinion

ID: 4062457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 20:29:39.39967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:46.450125
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                      JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 3, 2015

                                     NO. 03-14-00722-CR

                                    Mark Fruge, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

            APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                      JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 3, 2015

                                     NO. 03-14-00723-CR

                                    Mark Fruge, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

       APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
        BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND
 MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted

under subsection 22.02(b)(2)(B) of the Penal Code. The trial court’s judgment, as modified, is

affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                      JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 3, 2015

                                     NO. 03-14-00724-CR

                                    Mark Fruge, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

            APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
             BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.