Court Opinion

ID: 700109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:42:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:57.525202
License: Public Domain

60 F.3d 826NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earl Vonney WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Lonnie SAUNDERS, Warden;  Edward D. Carey, M.D.;  PamelaIngram, R.N.;  Nelson W. Sours, Jr., CorrectionalOfficer, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94 7262.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  April 11, 1995.Decided:  July 6, 1995.

Earl Vonney Wade, appellant pro se.  Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA;  Colin James Steuart Thomas, Jr., Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Wade v. Saunders, No. CA-93-194 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.