Court Opinion

ID: 7717031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:21:47.096872+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:08.071802
License: Public Domain

DELL, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority in its affirmance of the trial court’s order denying Melvin Rokeach’s motion to vacate default and for relief from final judgment. I would reverse and quash the service of process on Susan Rokeach on the authority of Ward v. Gibson, 349 So.2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In my view, the majority has failed to distinguish the facts in Ward from those relied upon as the basis for service of process on Mrs. Rok-each.