Court Opinion

ID: 7335643
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 22:55:38.775281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:12.688045
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appeal from an order striking out an answer as sham. The action was brought to recover rent under the terms of a written lease. The answer admits the making of the lease, and alleges the cancellation and rescission thereof, together with a counterclaim for $150. The affirmative issues thus raiséd cannot be stricken out as sham. Sham issues in this connection are synonymous with false issues, and to strike them out as sham would be to dispose of the merits on a motion. Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281; Miller v. Hughes, 21 How. Prac. 442; Webb v. Foster, 45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 311; Farnsworth v. Halstead (Sup.) 10 N. Y. Supp. 763; Barney v. King (Sup.) 13 N. Y. Supp. 685. Order appealed from reversed, with costs.