Court Opinion

ID: 9416498
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:47:35.926401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:28.674672
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice DANIEL
dissented from the opinion of the court in this case, and also in that of Newton v. Stebbins. ' For his opinion, see the conclusion of the last-mentioned case, Which follows the present.

Order.

This cause came, on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, and was' argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs and damages-at the rate of six per centum per annuni.