Court Opinion

ID: 352753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:05:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:38:40.911257
License: Public Domain

570 F.2d 95
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Guillermo Rhodes CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 76-3527.
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
March 9, 1978.

Gustavo Acevedo, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Laredo, Tex., Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Karen K. Friedman, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
J. A. Canales, U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Rene Gonzalez, Asst. U. S. Atty., Laredo, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion September 16, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 559 F.2d 300).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, and VANCE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument.  The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.