Court Opinion

ID: 9864648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 14:36:12.61139+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:21.428191
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
We do not think the case, as stated in the opinion of the district court of appeal, required any discussion or statement of the effect of the recently adopted section iy2 of article VI of the constitution. The errors complained of, as stated by that court in its opinion, were not of a character to work substantial injury, and they would not have required a reversal under section 1258 of the Penal Code nor under the rules of this court established long prior to the adoption of said section of the constitution. We express no opinion as to that part of the opinion referring to said amendment.