Court Opinion

ID: 9460386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:48:54.705184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:35.763818
License: Public Domain

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge
(concurring) :
In my view, the second suspension order is before us only to demonstrate that our case, which is limited to the first suspension order, is not moot simply because it has expired by its terms.
The second suspension order is the subject of a second action pending in the district court arid is not here on appeal.
I think the rationale of Block v. Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135, 41 S.Ct. 458, 65 L. Ed. 865 (1920), justifies the first suspension order. I have my doubts about the second one, but that is not before us. Surely, as Judge Duniway indicates, the time arrives when enough is too much.