Court Opinion

ID: 4127781
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:33:07.636568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:25.164190
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                        GREG       ABBOTT

                                               July 1, 2013

Ms. JoAnna Johnson                                 Opinion No. GA-1010
San Augustine County Auditor
100 West Columbia Street                           Re: Whether a commissioners court may enter
San Augustine, Texas 75972                         into an agreement with a third party to fund road
                                                   construction (RQ-11 07 -GA)

Dear Ms. Johnson:

        You ask two questions concerning the authority of county officials to enter into an
agreement with a private entity whereby the entity agrees to fund repairs to specific county
roads. 1 As you describe the agreement, a construction company will perform work on a county
road and bill the county. Request Letter at 1. The county will then "pass on billings" to the
private entity that has agreed to pay for the construction, and the county will "fund such billings
only after matching funds are provided" from the private entity. !d.

        You first ask whether a county commissioner, acting alone, may enter into an agreement
with a private entity to fund the repair of roads in the commissioner's precinct. !d. The
Legislature has authorized commissioners courts to "make and enforce all necessary rules and
orders for the construction and maintenance of public roads" and to "hire the labor and purchase
the machinery and equipment needed" to do so. TEX. TRANSP. CoDE ANN. § 251.003(a)(1}-(2)
(West 1999). However, a county can act only through its commissioners court, and the
"individual commissioners have no authority to bind the county by their separate action."
Canales v. Laughlin, 214 S.W.2d 451, 455 (Tex. 1948). Thus, a county commissioner, acting
alone, may not enter into an agreement with a private entity to fund the repair of specific roads.

      In your second question you ask whether the county may enter into an agreement
whereby the treasurer is required to "'send a bill from a construction company to an oil
company, the oil company then pay the county, and the treasurer then pay the construction
company."' Request Letter at 2. State law requires that the county treasurer "shall disburse the
money belonging to the county ... as the commissioners court may require or direct." TEX. Loc.
Gov'T CODE ANN. § 113.041(a) (West Supp. 2012). We find no authority addressing the ability

         'Letter from Ms. Jo Anna Johnson, San Augustine Cnty. Auditor, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'y
Gen. at 1-2 (Jan. 31, 2013), http://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").
Ms. Jo Anna Johnson - Page 2                          (GA-1010)

of the commiSSIOners court to enter into the specific payment arrangement you describe.
However, section 81.032 of the Local Government Code provides the commissioners court with
general authority to "accept a . . . donation . . . for the purpose of performing a function
conferred by law on the county." !d. § 81.032 (West 2008). An opinion of this office concluded
that "a commissioners court may accept a donation subject to the condition that it be used to
improve a particular road if the court finds the condition to be reasonable." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op.
No. GA-0359 (2005) at 3.

        A commissioners court may not accept donations with conditions that are unreasonable or
inconsistent with other law. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0073 (1999) at 3; see, e.g., TEX. Loc.
Gov'T CoDE ANN. § 262.023 (West Supp. 2012) ("Competitive Requirements for Certain
Purchases"); TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 251.008 (West 1999) ("General Requirements for
County Roads")? It is a matter for the exercise of good-faith discretion by the commissioners
court to determine whether the conditions attached to a particular donation are reasonable and
consistent with other law. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0073 (1999) at 3. If the commissioners
court determines that all conditions imposed by the donor are reasonable and consistent with
other law, section 81.032 of the Local Government Code gives the commissioners court
discretion to accept donations of money when doing so would further the county's road-building
and maintenance duties.

         2
          You write that "competitive bidding does not apply to this situation." Request Letter at 1. You do not ask
us to make a separate determination in that regard, and therefore, this opinion does not address whether competitive
bidding is required in this instance.
Ms. JoAnna Johnson - Page 3                  (GA-1010)

                                     SUMMARY

                    A county commissioner, acting alone, may not enter into an
              agreement with a private entity to fund the repair of county roads.

                      Section 81.032 of the Local Government Code gives a
              commissioners court discretion to accept donations of money with
              lawful, reasonable conditions attached when doing so would
              further the county's road-building and maintenance duties.

                                            Very truly yours,

DANIEL T. HODGE
First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES D. BLACKLOCK
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee

Virginia K. Hoelscher
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee