Court Opinion

ID: 8439942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:42:05.307479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.769959
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Antonio D. Tisdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Tisdale seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED