Court Opinion

ID: 5119786
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-20 20:08:52.513854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:59.137851
License: Public Domain

People v Rho (2021 NY Slip Op 05728)

People v Rho

2021 NY Slip Op 05728

Decided on October 20, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 20, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

2018-09047
 (Ind. No. 2058/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRobert Rho, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (William H. Branigan and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gregory Lasak, J.), imposed June 26, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Acting Clerk of the Court