Court Opinion

ID: 998181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:07:18.898752+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:08.016703
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7563

RANDY KENNON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

G. L. ROBERTS, Sergeant,

                                               Defendant - Appellee,

          and

JAMES FRENCH,

                                                           Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District
Judge. (CA-97-184-5-F)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Kennon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Randy Kennon appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.   We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Kennon v. Roberts, No. CA-97-184-5-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1998).    We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2