Court Opinion

ID: 3938465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:02:39.02681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:55.169602
License: Public Domain

The principal question presented in the application for the writ of error in this case goes to the validity of Subdivision 10 of Section 57 of the by-laws of Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, being the same by-law provision which we have this day held to be void in the case of Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Monico Martinez et ux., this day decided. (This volume, p. 580.
Other questions presented in the application go to the ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals on the other evidentiary matters discussed in the opinion of that court. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. De Martinez, 103 S.W.2d 995. We have carefully considered the questions raised, and conclude that the several rulings of that court are correct.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the judgment of the trial court, is affirmed.
Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court, March 22, 1939.
Chief Justice Cureton not sitting.