Court Opinion

ID: 8629646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:35:39.332923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:43.479311
License: Public Domain

THE COURT
(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)
was of opinion that the affidavit was sufficient, within the rule laid down by this court in the case of Smith v. Watson [Case No. 13,124].
The following cases were referred to: Smith v. Watson [supra]; Jolly v. Rankin [Case No. 7,440]; Bartleman v. Smarr [Id. 1,074]; Traverse v. Hight [Id. 14,151]; Way v. Selby [Id. 17,302]; Dawson v. Boyd [Id. 3,667]; 1 Sell. Pr. 105, 108.