Court Opinion

ID: 8095602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:18:48.472935+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:33.665016
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Johnson, J.
At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance *324with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.