Court Opinion

ID: 9517512
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:19:27.156384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:27.498759
License: Public Domain

*306ON APPELLEES’ PETITION FOR REHEARING
Per Curiam.
The appellees have filed their Petition For Rehearing, alleging that the Court erred in its opinion and decision in certain respects, and further asserting that the directive contained in our opinion is unclear. Upon review of the opinion, we find that it should be clarified. We now correct the same by deleting the final paragraph thereof and substituting in its stead the following:
“The Public Service Commission acted beyond its jurisdiction. It also acted arbitrarily and unreasonably in premising its dismissal of this application on the basis of continued non-existence of the seller. Since the essence of our decision is lack of jurisdiction, this cause is remanded to the Public Service Commission with instructions to correct its order dismissing the application for lack of an indispensable party, to dismissal on the ground it lacks jurisdiction of the application.”
With this correction, we re-affirm our original opinion in all other respects. The appellees’ Petition For Rehearing is denied.
Note.—Reported at 304 N.E.2d 336.