Court Opinion

ID: 9503627
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 19:48:21.033034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:37.307508
License: Public Domain

Young, J.
(concurring). If the parties choose to submit supplemental briefs for the application for leave to appeal, I would like them to address the theory under which a plaintiff may send a notice of intent to file a claim (NOI) to an address other than the defendant’s "last known business address,” as required by MCL 600.2912b(2), and still receive the benefit of NOI tolling.
I would also like the parties to address whether plaintiff receives the benefit of NOI statutory tolling with respect to defendant Gossage Eye Center (a professional corporation operated as the Gossage Eye Institute, EL.L.C.), assuming for the sake of argument that the notice provisions of MCL 600.2912b do not expressly apply to a professional corporation.