Court Opinion

ID: 6127683
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 20:41:20.480636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:39.799584
License: Public Domain

By the Coukt :
It was decided in Courtney v. Baker (3 Den., 27,) that in an action for the statutory penalty against a witness who had failed to attend, the plaintiff must show that the witness was material and that damages resulted from his non-attendance. That is, a sound construction of the law. There is no reason why a plaintiff should recover this penalty, unless he was aggrieved; that is, unless the *373absence of the witness caused some injury. There is nothing in the Code Civil Procedure (§ 853) to change this rule of law.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. .
Present — Learned, P. J., Bookes and Westbrook, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.