Court Opinion

ID: 5453184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 19:34:53.72122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:32.622544
License: Public Domain

MYRICK, J.
The evidence is insufficient to support the findings of the court below in the following particulars: In finding 8, that Caldwell was authorized to act for and on behalf of the defendants at the meeting of creditors, and by his acts to bind the defendants, and to enter into any agreement or contract with Love or his creditors; finding 10, so far as it is found that the defendants, or any person thereto authorized by them, made or joined in or ratified the agreement set forth in said finding 10; the whole of finding 13; finding 14, so far as it states or infers that the defendants entered into any agreement; finding 17, so far as it is found *252that the defendants, at the said meeting of creditors, agreed to sign any agreement; finding 20, as to any fraud on the part of defendants.
The judgment and order are therefore reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
We concur: Thornton, J.; Sharpstein, J.