Court Opinion

ID: 3196552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-21 16:06:31.392022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:26:41.604189
License: Public Domain

Bednark v New York City Tr. Auth. (2016 NY Slip Op 03095)

Bednark v New York City Tr. Auth.

2016 NY Slip Op 03095

Decided on April 21, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 21, 2016

Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, JJ.

912 111553/10

[*1]Kathleen Bednark, Plaintiff-Respondent,
vNew York City Transit Authority, et al., Defendants, Heron Real Estate Corp., et al., Defendants-Appellants. 
Heron Real Estate Corp., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, 
The City of New York, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale (James Carman of counsel), for appellants.
Rheingold, Valet, Rheingold, McCartney & Giuffra LLP, New York (Jeremy A. Hellman of counsel), for Kathleen Bednark, respondent.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Diana Lawless of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered December 3, 2014, which denied the motion of defendants Heron Real Estate Corp. (Heron), BP America, Inc. (BP) and Accede Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment to the extent of dismissing Heron's eighth affirmative defense that it is not a proper party to the action, and granted the motion of third-party defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendants' motion to the extent of dismissing the complaint as against BP and Accede Inc., and to deny the City's motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she fell while disembarking from a bus at the same location where she was previously injured in the same manner as alleged in a prior action. In that action, this Court found that there was a triable issue of fact as to whether the location was part of a City designated bus stop (Bednark v City of New York, 127 AD3d 403 [1st Dept 2015]). [*2]The parties have not presented evidence here sufficient to resolve this issue as a matter of law.
Furthermore, dismissal of the action as against BP and Accede Inc. is warranted since they were tenants, not property owners, and no evidence was presented that they had any role in the creation of the defective condition on the sidewalk. Accordingly, they had no obligation to maintain the area where plaintiff allegedly fell (see O'Brien v Prestige Bay Plaza Dev. Corp., 101 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2013]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 21, 2016
CLERK