Court Opinion

ID: 4219925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-14 09:08:52.28859+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:04.749424
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 November 09, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0465. SHEDRICK ROSS v. THE STATE.

      A jury found Shedrick Ross guilty of armed robbery, aggravated assault,
possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, conspiracy to commit
armed robbery, and possession of tools for the commission of a crime, and this Court
affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. Ross v. State, 281 Ga. App. 891 (637 SE2d
491) (2006). In 2017, Ross filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, asserting that
newly discovered evidence required a new trial and claiming that his sentence was
void because the State failed to properly allege and prove his prior convictions.
Following a hearing, the trial court denied Ross’s motion, and he filed a notice of
appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      As an initial matter, an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial
must be appealed by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7);
Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). However, a direct
appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to vacate or correct a
void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is,
in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg
v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void
sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and
validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not
authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment
for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,
572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Here, Ross does not argue that his sentence exceeds
the most severe punishment allowed, but that the State failed to follow the appropriate
procedure in seeking recidivist punishment. But such a claim does not amount to a
claim that the subsequent recidivist sentence is void. See id. at 572-573 (2); accord
Ward v. State, 299 Ga. App. 63, 64-65 (682 SE2d 128) (2009).
      Because Ross failed to file an application for discretionary review, as required
to appeal the denial of his extraordinary motion for new trial, and failed to raise a
colorable void-sentence claim, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        11/09/2017
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.