Court Opinion

ID: 6104413
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-19 01:00:36.226072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:50.276875
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10842      Document: 00516170551         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/18/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                  No. 21-10842                         January 18, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Cindy Romero-Arreola,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:21-CR-176-1

   Before King, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cindy Romero-
   Arreola has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Romero-Arreola has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10842    Document: 00516170551          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/18/2022

                                  No. 21-10842

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2