Court Opinion

ID: 3187281
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-21 19:02:55.934373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:02.945799
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Judith Jones appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part
  
   *
  
  Montgomery County Education Association and Doug Prouty’s motion to dismiss Jones’ claims against them, and granting the remaining Defendants’ motion to dismiss Jones’ claims against them. Jones has also filed a motion for a restraining order and a pre-filing injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Jones’ informal brief.
  
   See
  
  4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jones’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Jones has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. Moreover, Jones’ pending motion does not establish that she is entitled to the relief she seeks. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a restraining order and a pre-filing injunction and affirm the district court’s order.
  
   Jones v. Montgomery Cty. Pub. Sch.,
  
  No. 8:14-cv-04042-PWG (D. Md. filed Oct. 21, 2015, entered Oct. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   The district court’s order denied these Defendants' motion to dismiss only to the extent the motion sought a pre-filing injunction against Jones. The district court’s order nonetheless dismissed all of Jones' claims against these Defendants.