Court Opinion

ID: 8475081
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:18:52.798853+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:24.707984
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Allen Bailey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bailey, No. 3:94-cr00111-GCM-28 (W.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We deny Bailey’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.