Court Opinion

ID: 5621670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:38:18.033654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:26.660013
License: Public Domain

Broyles, O. J.
1. The court did not err in any of its rulings upon the pleadings.
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and as the motion *474for a new trial contained tlie usual general grounds only, tlie refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Decided June 19, 1931.
Zaclt Arnold, A. M. Zellner, II. A. Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error.
James W. Harris, B. L. Williams, Jr., Bennet ■& Peacock, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.