Court Opinion

ID: 5650938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 22:58:58.503522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:34.832913
License: Public Domain

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
The questions presented in this case are the same as those raised by appellant in the case of D. F. Appling v. Minarets & Western Ry. Co. (Civ. No. 6666), ante, p. 621 [280 Pac. 1029], this day decided by this court.  Upon the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Nourse, Acting P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on October 17, 1929, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on November 14, 1929.
All the Justices concurred.