Court Opinion

ID: 9868717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 18:51:50.630922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:53.432844
License: Public Domain

On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.
Our attention is directed to the following errors in our original opinion which are hereby corrected in the interest of accuracy :
1. On page 2 [147 S.W.2d 324], in stating the powers of the trustee under the deed of trust is included the right to purchase at trustee’s sale, this is error, we do not find that particular power granted the trustee. The same error is repeated on page 12 [147 S.W.2d 328].
2. Under the first proposition we stated that the only assignment in the new trial motion relating to this subj ect was the 26th. There are in the motion two other assignments, the 10th and 27th, to the same effect, and subject to the same comment. The three assignments read:
“10. The court erred in rendering judgment that nothing be taken by the cross-action on file herein.”
“26. The court erred in rendering judgment that the defendants take nothing by their cross-action.”
“27. The court erred in rendering judgment that the defendant, Frank Neilon, take nothing by his cross-action.”
With these corrections the motion is overruled.
Overruled.