Court Opinion

ID: 2755734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-26 16:09:35.181887+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:34:50.098069
License: Public Domain

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND
                REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
                consistent with this order.'

                                                              Hardesty

                                                              Douglas
                                                                     D,7,4                    J.

                CHERRY, J., concurring:
                              For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
                U.S. Bank, N.A.,     130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
                that respondent Nationstar lost its lien priority by virtue of the
                homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
                however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
                concur in the disposition of this appeal.

                                                                                              J.

                cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
                     Law Offices of Noggle Law PLLC
                     Akerman LLP/Las Vegas
                     Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters, LLP
                     Eighth District Court Clerk

                      1 The   injunction imposed by our January 22, 2014, order is vacated.

SUPREME COURT
        OF
     NEVADA
                                                       2
(0) 1947A