Court Opinion

ID: 1450685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:13:33.945034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:08:24.543156
License: Public Domain

275 S.W.3d 374 (2009)
Matthieu Daniel ORTALA, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
Madeline Therese BUTHOD, individually, and F.B., by his Next Friend, Madeline Therese Buthod, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 91124.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
January 27, 2009.
Clinton B. Roberts, Roberts & Kinsky, L.L.C., Farmington, MO, for appellant.
Benicia Baker Livorsi, The Family Law Group, LLC, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

*375 ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the trial court's judgment in a paternity case. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).