Court Opinion

ID: 8432103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 08:04:28.798224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:38.404059
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Liggins v. Police Dep’t, CA-04-14-5-GEC (W.D.Va., filed Sept. 30, 2004; entered Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED