Court Opinion

ID: 9690482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 19:14:44.969597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:57.478789
License: Public Domain

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice,
concurring.
I agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the defendants’ special exceptions to the shareholders’ second amended petition and ordering the shareholders to replead specifically to identify any alleged harm, damage, or injury distinct from that incurred by RAMP. I also agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the shareholders’ claims with prejudice for failure to comply with the district court’s order. While the shareholders did add allegations in their third amended petition that some of the plaintiffs purchased (and did not merely hold) stock in reliance on misrepresentations by Cohen and Brown, they ultimately failed to allege that these shareholders incurred any harm, injury, or *149damages from these purchases that were distinct from those incurred by RAMP.