Court Opinion

ID: 4053627
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 04:15:09.785445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:20:36.318927
License: Public Domain

People v Bynum (2016 NY Slip Op 06226)

People v Bynum

2016 NY Slip Op 06226

Decided on September 28, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 28, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2015-07636
 (Ind. No. 7009/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJermaine Bynum, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jill Oziemblewski of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed July 17, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record of the plea proceeding is inadequate to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and thus, the purported waiver of his right to appeal is not enforceable (see People v Matos, 102 AD3d 890, 891). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, HINDS-RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court