Court Opinion

ID: 989516
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:56.767691+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:38.288209
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6091

TAYLOR WARREN SMITH,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

MISS TROTTER, Counselor,

                                            Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-783)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                  Decided:   June 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taylor Warren Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th
Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the

case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee

order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse

of discretion. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-
is and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2