Court Opinion

ID: 9638051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 15:31:32.446543+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:05.230071
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion
by Mr. Justice Roberts:
I join in the result reached by the Court and agree that there is available to plaintiff-appellant an adequate remedy at law and that there is, on this record, no basis for equitable relief. However, the broad language of the opinion seems to indicate that in no instance does equity have jurisdiction where property is taken by eminent domain, a principle with which I cannot concur. See 30 C.J.S., Eminent Domain §§396, 401; 11 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations §32.129 (3rd ed. 1950).
Mr. Justice Musmanno joins in this opinion.