Court Opinion

ID: 9651507
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 16:21:03.433773+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:34.570349
License: Public Domain

SWAN, Circuit Judge.
I concur in the result. Restraint of trade was charged both in keeping unreasonably high the price of aluminum ingots and in unreasonably reducing the price of aluminum alloys, with the result, as the plaintiff alleges, that it could make no profit. The failure to submit to the jury the second branch of the complaint was an error which in my opinion requires reversal.
As to costs, I would allow the appellant but half the cost of printing the record because of its unnecessary prolixity. See Kynerd v. Hulen, 5 F.(2d) 160, 162 (C. C. A. 5).