Court Opinion

ID: 7752399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:21:39.196269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:42.589829
License: Public Domain

WOODALL, Justice
(dissenting from the rationale in part).
With regard to the holding that notice by publication for three consecutive weeks was legally sufficient, I dissent only from the rationale. Since the mortgage at issue was executed after January 1, 1989, the effective date of Act No. 88-906, 1988 Ala. Acts, codified at § 35-10-13, Ala.Code 1975, it is subject to § 35-10-13. That section provides, in pertinent part, that “[njotice of all sales under this article shall be given by publication once a week for three successive tveeks.” (Emphasis added.)
In all other respects, I concur.