Court Opinion

ID: 8657410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:17:22.9078+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:47.077419
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and the response to this court’s February 21, 2008 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). It does not appear that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint without leave to amend. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); Schreiber Distrib. Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., 806 F.2d 1393, 1401 (9th Cir.1986). Appellant’s other arguments on appeal are unavailing.
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.