Court Opinion

ID: 3099935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:01:34.451946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:51:33.456011
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                        SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                             FORT WORTH

                            NO. 02-13-00206-CV

NATASHA RAMSEY                                                APPELLANT

                                      V.

SUNSET MORTGAGE, ITS                                           APPELLEES
ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS
IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS' AND
U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST, JP
COURT NO. 1, COUNTY COURT
AT LAW NO.1 TARRANT COUNTY
CONSTABLES PCT 7

                                  ------------

         FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                  ------------

             MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
                                  ------------

     On August 13, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

     1
      See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

      Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution.     Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.      See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

      Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

                                                   PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 29, 2013

                                     2