Court Opinion

ID: 9522398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 02:24:44.904623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:02:42.487429
License: Public Domain

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.
(concurring and dissenting). Fishing as used in the ordinance must be interpreted to mean fishing as used in the statutes for purposes of licensing and regulation. The fee fishing in this case is not fishing for purposes of licensing and *391regulation. No fishing license or trout stamp is required for this fee fishing. Fee fishing is not limited to particular times of the year. I therefore conclude that the fee fishing in this case is not fishing within the ordinance and dissent from that part of the opinion.
I am authorized to state that Chief Justice NATHAN S. Heffernan joins this opinion.