Court Opinion

ID: 989323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:05:26.931371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:29.516082
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-6342

WESLEY ALLEN STALLINGS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-95-309-HC-BO)

Submitted:   April 30, 1996                  Decided:   May 21, 1996

Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Allen Stallings, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Stallings v. Freeman, No. CA-95-309-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2