Court Opinion

ID: 9857242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 14:07:12.335163+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:20.064388
License: Public Domain

On Petition to Behear
The plaintiff in error through counsel has filed a very courteous and capable petition to rehear herein.
*170We have carefully considered this petition which in effect raises one question, that is, that we concluded from this record that there were four convictions and to do so we must base one of these convictions purely on the memories of the jurors who tried and convicted this plaintiff in error on the fourth offense. The argument is that this fourth conviction was never proved and that we were in error in holding- that due to the fact that the jury had just tried this plaintiff in error on this fourth offense, and found him guilty, that it was competent for them to find that this was proof of a fourth conviction.
We have again carefully considered the matter and are satisfied that this is sufficient proof of a fourth conviction.
There are no new authorities cited and this argument of course is a repetition of the argument originally made on this question. We, though, have again considered the matter and are satisfied that this is sufficient proof on behalf of the State to establish these four convictions.
The result is that the petition to rehear must be overruled.