Court Opinion

ID: 9833022
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:22:42.729522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:57.867168
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Behearing.
In our original opinion we said that there was no allegation in any of the pleadings of the plaintiffs of the value of the patent right, which it was alleged defendants agreed to transfer to the proposed corporation in payment of 550 shares of the capital stock of the corporation contemplated. In their motion for rehearing appellants call our attention to an allegation, to the effect that the patent was worth at least $5,500, which defendants agreed to transfer to the proposed *514corporation in payment of capital stock of tire face value in the same amount.
In the voluminous pleadings, we overlooked that allegation and now here correct the mistake made by us. It is true, however, as stated in our original opinion, that the pleadings of ¡the complainants also contained, specific allegations that the value of the patent right was unknown to them. Our original conclusion on the whole case that there was no error in refusing the application for a temporary writ of injunction was based upon other reasons shown in our original opinion; which were sufficient of themselves to support the conclusion reached, as will appear from the opinion.
With this modification of our original opinion, the appellants’ motion for rehearing is overruled.