Court Opinion

ID: 3410211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 19:27:57.971457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:50:47.132655
License: Public Domain

The respondents move to dismiss this appeal because the transcript was not filed within the time granted by such extensions as were secured. Under the last extension, the transcript was due May 26, 1929. The transcript was filed June 1, 1929.
The only excuse offered for the delay is a general statement by counsel for appellant to the effect that the delay was occasioned by the failure of the clerk to prepare the transcript within the time as extended by this court.
Respondents have filed an affidavit made by the clerk of the trial court to the effect that the transcript was prepared without delay by such clerk and that the lapse of time occurred *Page 77 
because the clerk was waiting for counsel for appellant to secure a certificate of the trial judge as to certain papers used by him in connection with a motion on a temporary restraining order.
The specific dates and her actions, detailed by the clerk, make it clear that the delay was not her fault.
The last case decided by this court where the situation was similar to that herein was Grand View State Bank v. Thams,45 Idaho 566, 263 P. 1000, where the transcript was filed nine days too late. The excuse in that case, held inadequate, was at least as valid as here and the difference in time is not sufficient to distinguish the two cases.
Appeal dismissed.
Budge, C.J., and T. Bailey Lee and Varian, JJ., concur.
Wm. E. Lee, J., dissents.