Court Opinion

ID: 8462683
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:33:06.149568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.615542
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
John W. Fishback appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Department of Pub. Safety & Corr. Serv., No. 1:07-cv-01883-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.