Court Opinion

ID: 3188493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-24 13:06:07.935507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:38.022570
License: Public Domain

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 102 SSM 4
Douglas L. Leight, et al.,
                Plaintiffs,
John H. Masten,
                Appellant,
        v.
W7879 LLC, et al.,
                Respondents.

            Submitted by Seth A. Miller, for appellant.
            Submitted by Patrick K. Munson, for respondents.
            Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiae.

*   *   *     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *    *   *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,
order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered
upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten
failed to establish that his apartment, which was de-regulated in
2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and
Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal
lease at market rate. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott,
Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided March 24, 2016