Court Opinion

ID: 4994922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-27 15:15:31.953083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:16:48.207486
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Banks v. Doe, 2021-Ohio-3395.]

STATE OF OHIO                     )                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                  )ss:                  NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF LORAIN                  )

STATE OF OHIO EX REL. DAJUAN
BANKS
                                                        C.A. No.     21CA011746
        Petitioner

        v.
                                                        ORIGINAL ACTION IN
JOHN/JANE DOE, WILLOUGHBY                               HABEAS CORPUS
MUNICIPAL COURT, ET AL.

        Respondents

Dated: September 27, 2021

        PER CURIAM.

        {¶1}     Petitioner DaJuan Banks has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus asking this

Court to order Respondent Keith Foley, Warden of Grafton Correctional Institution, to release

him from prison. Warden Foley, and the other respondents, moved to dismiss. Because Mr.

Banks’ petition does not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court

must dismiss this action.

        {¶2}     R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil

action against a government employee or entity. All of the named respondents are government

entities or employees and Mr. Banks, incarcerated in the Grafton Correctional Institution, is an

inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if the inmate fails to comply with

the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel.

Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of

R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to
                                                                               C.A. No. 21CA011746
                                                                                          Page 2 of 3

dismissal.”). Mr. Banks failed to comply with the requirement that he file an affidavit of prior

civil actions or appeals.

        {¶3}   An inmate must “file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of each

civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any

state or federal court.” R.C. 2969.25(A). The affidavit must include a “brief description of the

nature of the civil action. R.C. 2969.25(A)(1). It must also include the “case name, case number,

and the court in which the civil action was brought,” R.C. 2969.25(A)(2), and the “name of each

party to the civil action or appeal[.]” R.C. 2969.25(A)(3). Finally, the affidavit must set forth

the “outcome of the civil action or appeal[.]” R.C. 2969.25(A)(4).

        {¶4}   Mr. Banks failed to file an affidavit of prior actions. He apparently served a copy

of the affidavit on the respondents because two motions to dismiss argued that the affidavit he

sent them does not comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25. The docket of this case,

however, does not reflect that Mr. Banks filed an affidavit of prior civil actions. The affidavit of

prior actions is also not attached to his petition. Because Mr. Banks failed to comply with the

mandatory requirement to file an affidavit of prior actions or appeals, this Court must dismiss

this action.

        {¶5}   Because Mr. Banks did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.

2969.25, this case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Mr. Banks. The clerk of courts is hereby

directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon

the journal. See Civ.R. 58.

                                                      DONNA J. CARR
                                                      FOR THE COURT
                                                                   C.A. No. 21CA011746
                                                                              Page 3 of 3

TEODOSIO, J.
CALLAHAN, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

DAJUAN BANKS, Pro se, Petitioner.

CHARLES E. COULSON, Prosecuting Attorney, and MICHAEL L. DELEONE, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent Judge Condon.

MICHAEL C. LUCAS, Attorney at Law, for Respondent John/Jane Doe, Willoughby Municipal
Court.

DAVE YOST, Attorney General, and JERRI L. FOSNAUGHT, Assistant Attorney General, for
Respondent Warden Foley.