Court Opinion

ID: 3123791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:44:51.332441+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:43.027390
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00354-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

                  IN RE MICHELLE ARTEAGA
____________________________________________________________

               On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
____________________________________________________________

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Relator, Michelle Arteaga, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause

on July 8, 2010. On July 13, 2010, the Court directed relator to file a transcript of any

relevant testimony, or a statement in lieu thereof, and requested that the real party in

interest, Jorge Arteaga, file a response to relator's petition for writ of mandamus on or

before the expiration of ten days. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2), 52.8(b). Relator has now

filed a “Notice of Nonsuit” stating that she no longer wishes to prosecute this matter

because the parties have entered into a settlement agreement to transfer the underlying

case to Nueces County, Texas.
      The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and relator’s “Notice of Nonsuit,” is of the opinion that relator’s motion to dismiss this

original proceeding should be and is GRANTED. This cause is DISMISSED without

reference to the merits.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                       PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
28th day of July, 2010.

                                            2