Court Opinion

ID: 9910182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-15 01:00:35.521867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:24.584366
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-51085         Document: 00517002027             Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/14/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                        No. 22-51085
                                      ____________                                     FILED
                                                                               December 14, 2023
   United States of America,                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jordan Keyshawn Sansom,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:22-CR-159-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jordan Sansom has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   We subsequently directed counsel to file supplemental briefing addressing
   “whether there is a nonfrivolous issue for appeal on plain error review
   regarding whether Sansom’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-51085         Document: 00517002027      Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/14/2023

                                   No. 22-51085

   the Second Amendment under New YorkP State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen,
   142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022).” Counsel has done so, and Sansom has not responded
   to either filing.
          We have reviewed counsel’s briefing and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2