Court Opinion

ID: 5749564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:54:56.192127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:14.793524
License: Public Domain

—• Order, entered on October 7, 1963, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the jury verdict reinstated and *776arbitration stayed. The questions of fact to be determined, i.e., was there .a “ hit and run ” accident, and was the report made, as required, within 24 hours, were properly submitted to the jury. The jury resolved both issues against petitioner-respondent. On this record it was within their province so to find and, consequently, their verdict should not have been set aside. Unlike the Landau ease (Matter of MV AIC [Landau], 20 A D 2d 699), the evideneé here was such that reasonable men' could draw different inferences from the facts as related, and much depended upon the determination by the jury of the credibility of the witnesses. It might be noted that if in fact the verdict were merely contrary to the weight of the evidence, a new trial would have been required (CPLR 4404). Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.