Court Opinion

ID: 9751410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 16:25:13.462695+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:45.715249
License: Public Domain

*424BELL, C.J.,
concurring and dissenting.
While I agree with the majority that the trial court erred when it failed to merge the petitioner’s conviction for second degree assault into his conviction for resisting arrest, pursuant to the required evidence test, for the reasons set forth in detail in my dissenting opinion in Black v. State, 426 Md. 328, 346, 44 A.3d 362, 373 (2012), I dissent from its holding that the petitioner failed to produce sufficient evidence of the court’s non-compliance with Maryland Rule 4-326(d).