Court Opinion

ID: 4851054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-24 09:24:44.353108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:44.947412
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                    NO. 03-21-00100-CV

                              Latanya Ann Wilson, Appellant

                                              v.

                              Ditech Financial, LLC, Appellee

                    FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY
                NO. 3779, THE HONORABLE JOE WEBER, JUDGE PRESIDING

                                         ORDER

PER CURIAM

               In February 2021, the trial court issued its judgment ordering that appellant

Latanya Ann Wilson and other occupants vacate a home in Schulenburg, Texas, and that

appellee Ditech Financial, LLC, would be entitled to obtain a writ of possession granting it

possession of the property if Wilson and the other occupants did not vacate within two weeks.

The trial court also ordered Wilson to pay a bond to pursue her appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &

Rem. Code § 52.006; Tex. R. App. P. 24.2. After the trial court issued its judgment and

Wilson filed her notice of appeal, Wilson filed with this Court an emergency motion for

temporary relief arguing that a bond requirement had been set, that she was unable to pay the

bond, that she had filed an affidavit of inability to pay, and that the trial court struck her

affidavit.   We granted the motion and temporarily stayed enforcement of the trial court’s
judgment and execution of the writ. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3; Wilson v. Ditech Fin., LLL,

No. 03-21-00100-CV, 2021 WL 1112900, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 23, 2021, order).

               After the clerk’s record was filed, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to

the trial court to conduct a hearing under Rule of Civil Procedure 145 regarding Wilson’s ability

to pay court costs and her appeal bond and to issue findings if it concluded that Wilson could pay

some or all of the costs and the appeal bond. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145; Wilson v. Ditech Fin.,

LLC, No. 03-21-00100-CV, 2021 WL 2385430, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 11, 2021, no

pet.) (mem. op.). We also ordered that a reporter’s record of the hearing and a supplemental

clerk’s record including the trial court’s order and any findings be filed with the clerk’s office.

               The supplemental clerk’s record has been filed and includes the trial court’s order

that Wilson pay an appeal bond of $8,357.60 and that Wilson “is not indigent.” The trial court

separately made findings of fact and conclusions of law that Wilson “makes $3400.00 per

month” and “has the ability of paying all court cost[s]” and “an appellate bond.” The evidence

from the hearing supports the trial court’s findings and conclusions. The trial court’s findings

also include in boldface language from Rule 145 that Wilson could challenge the order by filing

an appeal with this Court within ten days of the order being signed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145.

The trial court’s most recent order was signed on July 15, 2021. Wilson did not file an appeal

of this order. See id.

               Ditech Financial, LLC, filed a response to the emergency motion contending that

it is entitled to enforce the trial court’s judgment because Wilson did not post the bond required

by section 24.007 of the Property Code. See Tex. Prop. Code § 24.007. Section 24.007 provides

that “[a] judgment of a county court in an eviction suit may not . . . be stayed pending appeal

unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in

                                                  2
an amount set by the county court.” See id. Because the record shows that the Rule 145

requirements have been met, that Wilson has the ability to pay court costs and the appeal bond,

and that Wilson did not file a bond required by section 24.007 of the Property Code or appeal

the trial court’s most recent order, we dissolve our temporary stay of the enforcement of the

trial court’s judgment and execution of the writ and deny Wilson’s emergency motion for

temporary relief.

               It is ordered on August 20, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

                                                   3