Court Opinion

ID: 2913612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 17:47:32.921639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:11.553920
License: Public Domain

Opinion filed September 7, 2006 

 

 

Opinion filed September 7, 2006 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                        In The
                                                                              
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
                                                                 ____________
 
                                                          No. 11-06-00170-CR 
                                                    __________
 
                               EDWARD
TORRES LOPEZ, Appellant
 
                                                             V.
 
                                        STATE
OF TEXAS,
Appellee
 

 
                                         On
Appeal from the 338th District Court
 
                                                           Harris
County, Texas
 
                                                 Trial
Court Cause No. 1037068
 

 
                                                                   O
P I N I O N
The trial court convicted Edward Torres Lopez,
upon his plea of guilty, of indecency with a child.  Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the
trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for fifteen years.  We affirm.

Appellant=s
court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw.  The motion is supported by a brief in which
counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable
law and states that she has concluded that the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of
the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a
response to counsel=s
brief.  A response has not been
filed.  Court-appointed counsel has
complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High
v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.CEastland 2005, no pet.).
Following the procedures outlined in Anders,
we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is
without merit. 
The motion to withdraw is granted, and the
judgment is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
September 7, 2006
Do not publish.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Panel
consists of:  Wright, C.J., and
McCall,
J., and Strange, J.