Court Opinion

ID: 2922342
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:55:43.449767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:08.764983
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-05-250-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
 
ROBIN DUTTON,                                                      Appellant,
 
                                           v.
 
CERIDIAN CORPORATION,                                         Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                  On appeal from the 295th
District Court
                            of Harris
County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
   Before Chief Justice Valdez and
Justices Hinojosa and Castillo
                       Memorandum Opinion Per
Curiam
 
Appellant, ROBIN DUTTON, perfected an appeal from a
judgment entered by the   295th
District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 2003-65416.  The clerk=s record was filed on May 11, 2005.  No reporter=s record was filed.  Appellant=s brief was due on June 10, 2005.  To date, no
appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed,
the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant
reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured
by the appellant=s failure to timely
file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
On June 16, 2005, notice was given to all parties that
this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). 
Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be
dismissed for failure to file a brief. 
To date, no response has been received.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellant=s failure to file a
proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and
appellant=s failure to respond,
is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
prosecution.  The appeal is hereby
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion
delivered and filed
this the 28th
day of July, 2005