Court Opinion

ID: 622511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-09 16:40:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:18.114077
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 United States Court of Appeals
     for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

                       2011-1161
                 ______________________

        MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
                   Appellant,
                            v.
  DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES
      PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
                    Appellee,
                          and
                 TRANSWORKS, INC.,
                      Appellee.
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Inferences in
Reexamination No. 95/000,368.
                 ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

   SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer
and Risley, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, for appellant.

   RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
With him on the brief were BRIAN T. RACILLA, and JANET A.
GONGOLA, Associate Solicitors.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

            AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2012             /s/ Jan Horbaly
    Date                        Jan Horbaly
                                   Clerk