Court Opinion

ID: 9845924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:31:16.009421+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:26.695436
License: Public Domain

HENRIOD, Chief Justice
(dissenting).
Respectfully I dissent for the reasons I stated in Kent Club v. Toronto, 6 Utah 2d 67, 305 P.2d 870 (1957) and Entre Nous Club v. Toronto, 4 Utah 2d 98, 287 P.2d 670 (1955). I think any man, woman, child or corporation 'is entitled to the application of fundamental principles of due process under the Constitution. I simply cannot believe that the legislation on the subject of this litigation affords it, — one man, one vote to the contrary notwithstanding. One administrative officer, usually political, deciding a matter in a case where unsworn testimony is decisive, reminds one of the pre-Tea-Party procedures which a lot of people died to abolish.