Court Opinion

ID: 4300211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-02 08:55:04.83903+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:14.029645
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-88,665-01

                EX PARTE GREGORY DEMON CUNNINGHAM, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 31438-A IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest

in 2014 and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He contends that his sentence has

discharged but that he is still being confined in the Anderson County jail.

        According to Applicant, he was released to parole in 2015, and he states that he is now being

confined in the county jail pursuant to a parole-violation (a/k/a “blue”) warrant that was executed

in December 2016. According to the General Counsel’s Office for the Department of Criminal

Justice, the blue warrant was withdrawn on April 23, 2018, and the three-year sentence discharged
                                                                                                         2

on May 1, 2018. Applicant filed this habeas application complaining of his continued incarceration

in the Anderson County jail. The State did not respond to the habeas application, there is no relevant

information in the habeas application forwarded to this Court resolving the issue, and there are no

findings from the trial court.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Spann, 132
S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we

held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact.

        The trial court shall order the Sheriff of Anderson County to provide information regarding

the reason for Applicant’s continued confinement. To do so, the trial court may order an affidavit,

depositions, interrogatories, or a hearing. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.

art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether

Applicant should be released from the Anderson County jail. The trial court shall also make any

other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition

of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 15 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
                                                                                                 3

be forwarded to this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be

requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 1, 2018
Do not publish