Court Opinion

ID: 2914122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 18:05:24.77435+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:34.841321
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42826

STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 623
                                                )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: September 10, 2015
                                                )
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                )
COLTON MARK JAMISON,                            )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified seven-year sentence, with two-year
       determinate term, for burglary, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                      Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
                                 and HUSKEY, Judge
                  ________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
       Colton Mark Jamison pled guilty to burglary, Idaho Code § 18-1401. In exchange for his
guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court imposed a unified sentence of
seven years, with a two-year determinate term. Jamison appeals, contending that his sentence is
excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.

                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Jamison’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2