Court Opinion

ID: 601049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:23:20+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:07:05.185703
License: Public Domain

986 F.2d 1416
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Neil W. STEINHORN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-7154.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  February 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CR-90-22-PN, CA-92-1985-H)
Neil W. Steinhorn, Appellant Pro Se.
Gary Patrick Jordan, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Neil W. Steinhorn appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Steinhorn, Nos.  CR-90-22-PN, CA-92-1985-H (D. Md. Oct. 30, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED