Court Opinion

ID: 7426968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:48:58.926021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:25.243621
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Indus*454trial Commission bearing date January 5, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting.C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.