Court Opinion

ID: 9366640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-27 16:04:06.672671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:54.063365
License: Public Domain

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

                                           No. 124,975

             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

                                       STATE OF KANSAS,
                                           Appellee,

                                                 v.

                                  SAMUEL LUCAS PORTLOCK,
                                         Appellant.

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Appeal from Shawnee District Court; CHERYL A. RIOS, judge. Opinion filed January 27, 2023.
Affirmed.

       Submitted by the parties for summary disposition under K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(g) and (h).

Before CLINE, P.J., ISHERWOOD, J., and PATRICK D. MCANANY, S.J.

       PER CURIAM: Samuel Lucas Portlock claims the district court abused its
discretion when it revoked his probation and ordered him to serve his underlying prison
sentence. We granted his unopposed motion for summary disposition under Supreme
Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48).

       Portlock admits the district court had the legal authority to revoke his probation
since he stipulated to committing a new crime while on probation. See K.S.A. 2021 Supp.
22-3716(c)(7)(C) (permitting revocation when a new crime is committed on probation).
Portluck does not argue the district court made any legal or factual error, and we find
nothing unreasonable about the district court's decision.

                                                 1
Affirmed.

            2