Court Opinion

ID: 4696103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-16 18:00:37.819138+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:38.836136
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-11083     Document: 00515901827         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/16/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        June 16, 2021
                                  No. 19-11083
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Michael Guy Stanbery,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:19-CR-7-2

   Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Michael Guy Stanbery has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Stanbery has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-11083     Document: 00515901827          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/16/2021

                                   No. 19-11083

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2