Court Opinion

ID: 9665306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:44:29.533955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:14.378004
License: Public Domain

GONZALEZ, Justice,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. It is clear to me that the trial court considered the military retirement in arriving at the division of the property. While it may have been error under McCarty and Cameron to have done so, this error was rendered harmless by the passage of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act. 10 U.S.C.A. § 1408(c)(1) (West Supp.1983). There is no reason to believe, nor any indication, that the trial judge would or should render a different decision on remand.
No abuse of discretion is shown. Therefore, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.