Court Opinion

ID: 9416996
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:59:58.616776+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:29.628236
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD,
with whom concurred Mr. Justice DAVIS, dissenting:
I dissent from the opinion and judgment of the court in this case for the following reasons: (1.) Because courts of equity may exercise jurisdiction to set aside and annul a decree of the Probate Court approving and allowing an instrument purporting to be the last will and.testament of a deceased person, in a case where it appears that the instrument is a forgery and that the decree approving and allowing the instrument was procured by perjury and fraud, provided it appears that the injured party has not been guilty of laches and that he has no other adequate remedy. (2.) Because all the leading authorities cited to support the opposite rule admit that the jurisdiction does exist in cases where there is no other remedy. (3.)' Because the right of the complainants in this cause is not barred by the statute of limitations.