Court Opinion

ID: 9832616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:03:05.957322+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:49.523041
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant has filed with his motion for a rehearing a certified copy of the will of John Bradley, and also an affidavit by Mrs. Coleman, to the effect that she is not in possession of any of the property of John Bradley, deceased, and that she thinks appellant’s claim is just and ought to be paid.
These documents hot having been incorporated in the transcript, and not pertaining to our jurisdiction, cannot be considered by us. We state, however, that the copy of the will does not indicate anything different from the allegations with reference thereto as shown in our original opinion herein. We are impressed with the idea that appellant has a meritorious claim; but he has not pursued the proper remedy, and we can grant him no relief. If Mrs.' Coleman was not administering the estate of John Bradley, she should have resigned, or, failing to do so, appellant as a creditor of said estate might have had her removed, and an ad--ministrator of the estate appointed, to whom he could have presented his claim.
For the reasons stated in our original opinion and in this supplemental opinion, appellant’s motion for a rehearing is overruled.!
Motion overruled.