Court Opinion

ID: 1009843
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:02:33.352205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:55.537237
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 03-6017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ALFRED LEE DAY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CR-98-15-R, CA-01-662-7)

Submitted:   February 20, 2003         Decided:     February 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Lee Day, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alfred Lee Day seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Day has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.        See United States v. Day,

Nos. CR-98-15-R; CA-01-662-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before   the   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                    2