Court Opinion

ID: 7295837
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 20:40:25.10082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:19:25.084082
License: Public Domain

Pashman, J.
(concurring in dissent). I agree with the dissent insofar as it concludes that Ricciardi is entitled to compensation under the liberally interpreted terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. However, I will defer consideration of the complete abandonment of the “going and coming rule” to another day.
I vote to affirm the majority in the Appellate Division.
For reversal—Justices Hall, Sullivan and Cliffoed and Judges Confoeb and Colhestbe—5.
For affirmance—Justices Jacobs and Pashman—2.