Court Opinion

ID: 8683716
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 06:45:38.562134+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:32.742290
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *  The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trini Lopez Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance "with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza has fíled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Espinoza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Espinoza’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.