Court Opinion

ID: 9892185
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-20 20:01:51.084415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:17:45.082343
License: Public Domain

Cite as: 601 U. S. ____ (2023)             1

                    Statement of GORSUCH, J.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                          _________________

                           No. 23A296
                          _________________

         MISSOURI, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
                 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
                       [October 20, 2023]

   The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAVANAUGH
and by him referred to the Court is denied.
   JUSTICE THOMAS would grant the application for stay.
   Statement of JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE
ALITO joins, respecting the denial of the application for stay.
   With the understanding that the district court “prohib-
ited” only “implementation and enforcement” of H. B. 85 by
the State of “Missouri and its officers, agents, and employ-
ees” and “any others in active concert with such individu-
als,” App. to Emergency Application 29a, I agree with the
denial of the application for a stay under the present cir-
cumstances. An injunction purporting to bind private par-
ties not before the district court or the “challenged” provi-
sions “themselves,” however, would be inconsistent with the
“equitable powers of federal courts.” Whole Woman’s
Health v. Jackson, 595 U. S. 30, 44 (2021).