Court Opinion

ID: 5157982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 02:27:22.444559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:28.786228
License: Public Domain

[1] Plaintiff, Commercial Claims, Ltd., obtained a judgment against defendant, Ram Construction, Inc., and sought to garnish funds held by garnishee, First National Bank of Glenwood Springs. Plaintiff appeals the trial court's order awarding garnishee attorneys' fees for a frivolous claim. We reverse.
[2] Section 13-17-101, C.R.S. 1973 (1981 Cum. Supp.), provides for attorneys' fees under certain circumstances "in any suit involving money damages . . . ." A garnishment is not such an action. It "is but an ancillary proceeding . . . in aid of execution issued pursuant to an existing judgment, thus limiting any judgment proper to be entered against the garnishees to the extent of the unpaid balance of the judgment upon which execution issued." Wright v. Nelson, 125 Colo. 217, 242 P.2d 243
(1952). While attorneys' fees for the garnishee could be permitted by statute, see, e.g., N.M. Stat. Ann. § 35-12-16(B) (1978), cited in Bankof New Mexico v. Priestley, 95 N.M. 569, 624 P.2d 511 (1981), there is no such provision in any Colorado statute or rule. See C.R.C.P. 103(y).
[3] The judgment is reversed.
[4] JUDGE PIERCE and JUDGE KIRSHBAUM concur. *Page 1005