Court Opinion

ID: 547901
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:07:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:41.630874
License: Public Domain

914 F.2d 248Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charles Thomas LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, James E. Johnson, Sgt. Hudderson, T.C.Barksdale, Sgt. Staton, R.T. Morris, MichaelShupe, Jan Catbagan, Ruth Johnson,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-7345.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 29, 1989.Decided Sept. 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.  Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-87-105-L;  CA-87-115-L)
Charles Thomas Locklear, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Charles Thomas Locklear appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Locklear v. Murray, CA-87-105-L, CA-87-115-L (W.D.Va. Dec. 7, 1988).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.