Court Opinion

ID: 1007135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:20:51.274476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:51.770769
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-8050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-93-133-P, CA-01-580-3-2-MU)

Submitted:   March 14, 2002                 Decided:   March 25, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant Pro Se.  Gretchen C. F.
Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David Fitzgerald Lightner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Lightner, Nos. CR-93-133-

P; CA-01-580-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 9, 2001, entered Nov. 13,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2