Court Opinion

ID: 2825495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-11 06:12:40.365837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:48.485420
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Redd, 2015-Ohio-3090.]

                                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                                ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                    TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO,                                   :         MEMORANDUM OPINION

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
                                                           CASE NO. 2015-T-0027
        - vs -                                   :

STANLEY E. REDD, JR.,                            :

                 Defendant-Appellant.            :

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2011 CR 00163.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, LuWayne Annos, Assistant Prosecutor,
Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481-1092
(For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Stanley E. Redd, Jr., pro se, PID: A641-490, Lake Erie Correctional Institution, P.O.
Box 8000, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 (Defendant-Appellant).

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.

        {¶1}     This matter is before this court on the pro se motion for leave of appellant,

Stanley E. Redd, Jr., to file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A). Along with his

motion, appellant filed his notice of appeal on March 23, 2015. Appellant appeals from

his conviction and sentence of April 24, 2013.
       {¶2}   A timely notice of appeal from the April 24, 2013 judgment entry was due

no later than May 24, 2013, which was not a weekend or a holiday. Appellant’s notice

of appeal was not filed until March 23, 2015, almost two years beyond the due date.

       {¶3}   Appellee filed its response in opposition to the motion for delayed appeal

on March 25, 2015. Appellant filed a pro se reply to the response on April 2, 2015.

       {¶4}   We would first note that appellant, by and through counsel, filed a timely

appeal with this court of his conviction and sentence in 11th Dist. No. 2013-T-0054 on

May 23, 2013. That appeal was dismissed for appellant’s failure to file his appellate

brief on September 16, 2013.

       {¶5}   App.R. 4(A)(1) states in relevant part:

       {¶6}   “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”

       {¶7}   App.R. 5(A) provides:

       {¶8}   “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the

filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave

of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

       {¶9}   “(a) Criminal proceedings;

       {¶10} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

       {¶11} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

       {¶12} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the

                                              2
trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals.”

       {¶13} In his motion, appellant generally asserts that he was never informed by

his trial counsel or the trial court that he could appeal his sentence.       In addition,

appellant indicates that his former appellate counsel in his previously dismissed appeal,

2013-T-0054, filed a motion to reinstate appellant’s appeal which was overruled by this

court March 11, 2014.

       {¶14} First, as correctly indicated in appellee’s response to the present motion,

page six of appellant’s signed plea reflects that he was advised by counsel and the trial

court that he had a limited right to appeal his sentence within 30 days.

       {¶15} Secondly, appellant waited over a year to file his motion for leave to

appeal and notice of appeal after his motion to reinstate his previous appeal was

overruled by this court. Not only has appellant not offered any convincing reason for

filing a late appeal of his conviction and sentence, but he has also failed to explain the

delay of over a year to appeal after his motion to reinstate was overruled.

       {¶16} For the foregoing reasons, appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a

delayed appeal is hereby overruled.

       {¶17} Appeal dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,

concur.

                                             3