Court Opinion

ID: 5105023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 03:13:07.6324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:12.296840
License: Public Domain

OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Respondent, Judge Gene Knize, did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56 (Tex.2003), when he ruled. We deny the petition for mandamus, without prejudice, to allow him to reconsider his ruling. See In re de la Garza, 92 S.W.3d 416 (Tex.2001) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Van Waters & Rogers Inc., 988 S.W.2d 740 (Tex.1998) (orig.proceeding) (per curiam).