Court Opinion

ID: 9802725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 14:48:56.758291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:01:49.036213
License: Public Domain

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the judgment.
Although the question is close, I concur in the judgment on the ground that while this controversy is “capable of repetition” in relation to the 2014-15 school year, the controversy need not “evade review” if the plaintiffs seek prompt rulings in the district court and expedited appellate review on claims for preliminary injunctive or permanent injunctive and declaratory relief. See Iowa Prot. and Advocacy Servs. v. Tanager, Inc., 427 F.3d 541, 544 (8th Cir.2005); Minn. Humane Soc’y v. Clark, 184 F.3d 795, 797 (8th Cir.1999).