Court Opinion

ID: 814745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-01-04 00:15:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:47.945588
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-50923       Document: 00512100272         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/03/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          January 3, 2013
                                     No. 11-50923
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

HUMBERTO DELGADO,

                                                  Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER III, BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP,

                                                  Respondents-Appellees

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:11-CV-51

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Humberto Delgado, former federal prisoner # 64369-279, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his exclusion from
rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. As Garcia has been released from
Bureau of Prisons custody, we grant Respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal
as moot and dismiss the appeal as moot. See Calderon v. Moore, 518 U.S. 149,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 11-50923    Document: 00512100272      Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/03/2013

                                  No. 11-50923

150 (1996). Respondents’ alternative motion for an extension of time to file a
brief is denied as unnecessary.
      MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENIED.

                                       2