Court Opinion

ID: 681991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:40:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:20.094810
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1179
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Thomas Ray KING, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6448.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 1994Decided Nov. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.  Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge.  (CR-91-8-B, CA-92-96-2)
Thomas Ray King, Appellant Pro Se.  Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. King, Nos.  CR-91-8-B;  CA-92-96-2 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED