Court Opinion

ID: 4127036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-17 14:05:14.345973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:26.297125
License: Public Domain

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SRMOF II 2012-1 TRUST, U.S. BANK TRUST
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS
INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE,

             Appellant,

 v.                                                            Case No. 5D16-973

JOSE GARCIA A/K/A JOSE GARCIA, SR.,
FREDDIE GARCIA, CANDIDA CANALAS,
HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III
AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CHASE
HOME FINANCE, LLC, ETC.,

           Appellees.
______________________________________/

Opinion filed February 10, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Volusia County,
Dawn D. Nichols, Judge.

Sonia Hernriques McDowell, of Quintairos,
Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for
Appellant.

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. Greenlee,
P.A., Sanford and Mandy Pavlakos, of the Law
Office of Mandy Pavlakos, P.A., Lake Mary, for
Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

      SRMOF II 2012-1 Trust, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its Individual

Capacity, but Solely as Trustee (the “Bank”), plaintiff below, appeals a final Order of
Involuntary Dismissal Without Prejudice for its failure to perfect service on one of the

defendants and an order denying its motion to vacate the same. The Bank contends that

the court erred in failing to consider the Kozel1 factors in granting         the involuntary

dismissal without prejudice.

       We align our position with that of the Second District in Federal National Mortgage

Ass’n v. Linner, 193 So. 3d 1010, 1012-13 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), and held that an

involuntary dismissal without prejudice does not require a consideration of the Kozel

factors. Accordingly, like the Second District, we certify conflict with the First District and

Third District on this matter. HSBC Bank USA v. Cook, 178 So. 3d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA

2015); BAC Home Loans Servicing L.P. v. Parrish, 146 So. 3d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014);

BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Ellison, 141 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Fed.

Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Wild, 164 So. 3d 94, 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). Otherwise, we find no

merit to the Bank’s remaining claims.

       AFFIRMED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

COHEN, C.J., EVANDER, J., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

       1   Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993).

                                              2