Court Opinion

ID: 8436443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:31:32.672559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.470420
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip M. Pridgen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pridgen v. Dep’t of Pub. Works, No. 1:08-cv-02826-WDO, 2009 WL 4726619 (D.Md. Dec. 1, 2009). We deny Pridgen’s motion for appointment of counsel as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.