Court Opinion

ID: 8456835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:15:50.725605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.898187
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pam Lydia appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lydia, No. 7:05-cr-01080-GRA-4, 2013 WL 3894820 (D.S.C. July 26,2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.