Court Opinion

ID: 1016258
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:46:06.521924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:38.399249
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-6067

WILLIAM JAMES MEADERS,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-666-5)

Submitted:   May 19, 2005                     Decided:   May 25, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William James Meaders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

            William James Meaders, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).      We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district    court.    See   Meaders   v.     Stansberry,   No.   CA-04-666-5

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004).      We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials    before   the   court   and     argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                    - 2 -