Court Opinion

ID: 6328374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-30 19:08:35.476834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:39.496982
License: Public Domain

People v Thigpen (2022 NY Slip Op 02139)

People v Thigpen

2022 NY Slip Op 02139

Decided on March 30, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 30, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2019-14569
 (Ind. No. 7637/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vSamuel Thigpen, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Denise Pavlides of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), imposed December 4, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court