Court Opinion

ID: 9636006
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 14:12:04.717699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:24.355109
License: Public Domain

GONZALEZ, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment of the Court, but disagree with part IV of the Court’s opinion. The two-prong test of Flores v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 777 S.W.2d 38 (Tex.1989), is not used in any other jurisdiction that has interpreted the phrase “anticipation of litigation.” For the reasons stated in Scott v. Twelfth Court of Appeals, 843 S.W.2d 439, 447 (Tex.1993) (Gonzalez, J., dissenting), I would overrule Flores and bring Texas in line with the overwhelming majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed this issue.