Court Opinion

ID: 3979478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:36:36.212288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:11.364752
License: Public Domain

This conviction was for unlawfully carrying on and about his person a pistol.
The State's case is, that appellant and the witness Ham McCarty and two others, had called on the witness Hobson requesting him to give the boys a party. This was declined by Hobson. Appellant and McCarty went away from Hobson in company with each other, and after leaving Hobson's residence, at a point three or four hundred yards distant, appellant stated that if he had a pistol he would discharge it. McCarty handed him his pistol, and appellant fired it once, possibly twice, and immediately handed it back to McCarty. This is the evidence, and if not sufficient, the State has no case. We are of opinion that it is not sufficient.
Without going into a discussion of the reasons, the cases of Sanderson v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 520, and Cathey v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 492, are authority for deciding the case adversely to the State on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to convict appellant of unlawfully carrying on and about his person a pistol.
The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.