Court Opinion

ID: 8029994
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:03:48.816597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.381514
License: Public Domain

On November 16, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years, for the offense of Theft, Common Scheme, a felony; and Count II: Commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Forgery, Common Scheme, a felony. Counts I & II shall run concurrently with each other and with Yellowstone County Cause Nos. DC-04-635 and DC-04-1099.
On April 7, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by David Duke. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 7th day of April, 2006.
Chairperson, Hon. John Whelan, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Alt. Member, Hon. Blair Jones.