Court Opinion

ID: 4643416
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-16 14:11:02.050682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:39.647535
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-6703.]

                          DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. EISLER.
 [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-6703.]
(No. 2014-0970—Submitted December 15, 2020—Decided December 16, 2020.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, David Charles Eisler, Attorney
Registration No. 0020362, last known address in Cleveland Heights, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 18, 2015,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from
the practice of law for a period of two years with the second year stayed on
conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler, 143 Ohio St.3d
51, 2015-Ohio-967, 34 N.E.3d 99.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,
and STEWART, JJ., concur.
                              ________________________