Court Opinion

ID: 9695966
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 18:32:14.670589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:17.626253
License: Public Domain

Clinton, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting-in part.
I disagree with the portion of the opinion which indi*308cates that an award of interest or of damages under section 88-510, R. R. S. 1943, were appropriate alternatives under the facts of this case. I would hold that section 88-510, R. R. S. 1943, applies only where there is a delay in delivering the property evidenced by the warehouse receipt. There was not here a mere delay in delivery of the beans. They were converted. The value of the beans and interest was the proper measure of damages.
Bosiaugh, J., joins in opinion of Clinton, J.