Court Opinion

ID: 9828536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:28:26.200676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:50.223002
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
The appellants complain, and correctly so, of the failure to sustain their assignment of error complaining of the judgment in cross-action by the appellee. The county of Gamp sought and obtained judgment vesting in the county title in fee simple to .the lots. The assignment in question was overlooked and should now be sustained, we think, in view of the answer returned to the certified question that the county of Camp did not acquire a fee-simple title to the lots. The judgment is accordingly so reformed as to deny any recovery to the appellees on the cross-action. The judgment will otherwise remain undisturbed.
Except as to reformation of the judgment, the motion for rehearing is overruled.