Court Opinion

ID: 9546484
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:30:20.616786+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:16:31.052582
License: Public Domain

HENDLEY, Judge (specially concurring). I concur in the majority opinion except for that part under the Jurisdiction heading which gratuitously discusses waiver. The vice of this part of the opinion is that it is unnecessary and at best advisory. See State v. Barboa, 84 N.M. 675, 506 P.2d 1222 (Ct.App.1973), Special Concurring Opinion. The short answer to the issue is found in State v. Sedillo, 86 N.M. 382, 524 P.2d 998 (Ct.App.1974), (concurred in by the majority herein) : we are simply unable to review orders of the Supreme Court.