Court Opinion

ID: 8675895
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:01:55.193825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.952843
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Charles Edward Gary seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claim against some of the Defendants without prejudice, but allowing his claim against the remaining Defendant to proceed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gary seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.