Court Opinion

ID: 2769695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-13 23:07:07.399025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:46:34.640734
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                             WESTERN DISTRICT

EDELLA JOHNSON (A/K/A EDELLA               : No. 335 WAL 2014
ROBINSON, A/K/A EDELLA ROBINSON            :
JOHNSON), ERIC JOHNSON,                    :
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF              : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the
OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED                   : Order of the Superior Court
FORMER AND CURRENT                         :
HOMEOWNERS IN PENNSYLVANIA,                :
                                           :
                    Petitioners            :
                                           :
                                           :
             v.                            :
                                           :
                                           :
PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP,            :
                                           :
                    Respondent             :

                                       ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

      (1)    Does Act 6, §502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute
             establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily
             prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?

      The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DISMISSED as moot.