Court Opinion

ID: 6330795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-13 16:00:33.816063+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:06.708376
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 21-1417
                     ___________________________

                          United States of America

                     lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                        v.

                               Anthony Birdine

                    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                    ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                               ____________

                         Submitted: March 28, 2022
                            Filed: April 5, 2022
                               [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before KELLY, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
      Anthony Birdine seeks a sentence reduction under Amendments 706, 750, and
782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court1
denied one, and we affirm.

       In the course of addressing Birdine’s motion, the district court explained why
it denied relief. See United States v. Burrell, 622 F.3d 961, 964 (8th Cir. 2010). And
that explanation was sufficient for us to conclude that there was no abuse of
discretion. See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 827 F.3d 787, 790 (8th Cir. 2016).
                        ______________________________

      1
        The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.

                                         -2-