Court Opinion

ID: 4209478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-05 16:12:43.098015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:40.525188
License: Public Domain

People v Newkirk (2017 NY Slip Op 06993)

People v Newkirk

2017 NY Slip Op 06993

Decided on October 5, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 5, 2017

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

4612 609/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vCraig Newkirk, Defendant-Appellant.

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Biben, J.), rendered on or about March 1, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 5, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.