Court Opinion

ID: 6497642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-05 12:06:20.101171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:28.511204
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

                                         2022-NCCOA-458

                                          No. COA21-503

                                         Filed 5 July 2022

     Pender County, No. 20 CVS 752

     LT. COL. DONALD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff,

                   v.

     PENDER COUNTY, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

             Appeal by Plaintiff from Order entered 21 January 2021 by Judge Phyllis M.

     Gorham in Pender County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 9 March

     2022.

             Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, pro se, for plaintiff-appellant.

             Carl W. Thurman, III for defendant-appellee.

             HAMPSON, Judge.

¶1           Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s 21 January

     2021 Order which granted a Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default entered against

     Pender County, Incorporated (Defendant). Because an order setting aside an entry

     of default is an interlocutory order and we conclude Plaintiff has not identified any

     substantial right that would be lost absent an immediate appeal which might

     otherwise give rise to a right to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order, we dismiss

     Plaintiff’s appeal. The Record tends to reflect the following:
                                 SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY

                                         2022-NCCOA-458

                                        Opinion of the Court

                           Factual and Procedural Background

¶2         On 28 August 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking reimbursement of taxes

     Plaintiff claimed are illegally collected by Defendant and injunctive relief restraining

     Defendant from the assessment and collection of property taxes. On 7 October 2020,

     Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint. On 12 October 2020, Plaintiff filed a

     Motion captioned Motion for Default Judgment. On 13 October 2020, an Assistant

     Clerk of Superior Court for Pender County entered an Order allowing Plaintiff’s

     Motion pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, which

     governs entry of default. On 8 December 2020, Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside

     Default and in the Alternative Motion to Enlarge Time which sought to deem the 7

     October 2020 Answer timely filed. Following a 19 January 2021 hearing, the trial

     court entered its Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default.

     The trial court determined good cause had been shown to set aside entry of default in

     that the clerk did not have authority to enter default after the Answer had been filed

     and that Defendant had made a mistake as to when the Answer was due. The trial

     court also ruled Plaintiff would not be prejudiced by setting aside entry of default.

     On 16 February 2021, Plaintiff filed written Notice of Appeal to this Court from the

     trial court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default.

                                   Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3         Before we can reach the merits of this appeal, we must first examine whether
                                  SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY

                                         2022-NCCOA-458

                                        Opinion of the Court

     this appeal is properly before this Court such that we have authority to reach the

     merits. This is so because: “Appeals from the trial division in civil cases are permitted

     only by statute.” Ford v. Mann, 201 N.C. App. 714, 716, 690 S.E.2d 281, 283 (2010).

¶4         As a general matter, with certain exceptions not applicable here: “appeal lies

     of right directly to the Court of Appeals . . . from any final judgment of a superior

     court.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27(b)(1) (2021). “A final judgment is one which disposes

     of the cause as to all the parties, leaving nothing to be judicially determined between

     them in the trial court.” Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 361-62, 57 S.E.2d 377, 381

     (1950). Whereas, “an interlocutory order is one made during the pendency of an

     action, which does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial

     court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy.” Id.

¶5         Generally, there is no right to appeal from an interlocutory order. Jeffreys v.

     Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture, 115 N.C. App. 377, 379, 444 S.E.2d 252, 253 (1994).

     However, a party may appeal an interlocutory order “where delaying the appeal will

     irreparably impair a substantial right of the party.” Hudson-Cole Dev. Corp. v.

     Beemer, 132 N.C. App. 341, 344, 511 S.E.2d 309, 311 (1999) (citation omitted); see

     N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1A-1, Rule 54(b), 1-277, 7A-27(d) (2021). “It is the appellant’s

     burden to present appropriate grounds for . . . acceptance of an interlocutory appeal

     . . .” Hanesbrands Inc. v. Fowler, 369 N.C. 216, 218, 794 S.E.2d 497, 499 (2016).

¶6         Here, Plaintiff seeks an immediate appeal of an Order Granting Defendant’s
                                    SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY

                                            2022-NCCOA-458

                                           Opinion of the Court

     Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. An order setting aside an entry of default

     previously entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure is

     interlocutory. Pioneer Acoustical Co. v. Cisne & Assocs., Inc., 25 N.C. App. 114, 114,

     212 S.E.2d 402, 403 (1975).1 Thus, as a general principle, Plaintiff has no right to an

     immediate appeal of this interlocutory order.

¶7          Plaintiff acknowledges the interlocutory nature of the Order Granting

     Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default. Nevertheless, Plaintiff asserts the

     Order affects a substantial right justifying his immediate appeal in this case.

     Plaintiff contends the Order setting aside the entry of default had the effect of

     overruling a final judgment. Plaintiff, however, confuses the entry of default under

     Rule 55(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure—what is at issue here—

     and a final default judgment under Rule 55(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil

     Procedure. “The entry of default, which is the first step, is interlocutory in nature

     and is not a final judicial action.” State Emps.’ Credit Union, Inc. v. Gentry, 75 N.C.

     App. 260, 265, 330 S.E.2d 645, 648 (1985) (citation omitted).                Thus, Plaintiff’s

     contention here is unavailing.

            1 A panel of this Court has previously observed: “In fact, an order setting aside an
     entry of default is the virtual poster child for interlocutory orders given that many additional
     steps will have to occur before Plaintiffs’ claims are resolved at the Superior Court level.”
     Decker v. Homes, Inc./Constr. Mgmt. & Fin. Grp., 197 N.C. App. 628, 680 S.E.2d 270 (2009)
     (unpublished).
                                    SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY

                                            2022-NCCOA-458

                                           Opinion of the Court

¶8            Plaintiff further contends the Order setting aside the entry of default impacted

       his rights as an adverse ruling over the trial court’s jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s person

       and property. This contention is without merit as, again, the trial court’s decision is

       interlocutory and not a final judgment on the merits. Moreover, in setting aside the

       entry of default, the trial court will continue to exercise jurisdiction over this matter

       pending a final determination on the merits of Plaintiff’s case. We, therefore, reject

       Plaintiff’s contention in this regard.

¶9            Finally, Plaintiff has failed to show any merit in this interlocutory appeal.

       Plaintiff obtained entry of default after the filing of Defendant’s albeit untimely

       Answer. However:

                 default may not be entered if an answer has been filed, even if the
                 answer is deficient in some respect. Peebles v. Moore, 302 N.C.
                 351, 275 S.E.2d 833 (1981) (no default judgment could be entered
                 by clerk even though answer not timely filed); Rich v. Norfolk
                 Southern Railway Co., 244 N.C. 175, 92 S.E.2d 768 (1956)
                 (unverified answer precluded entry of default judgment); Bailey
                 v. Davis, 231 N.C. 86, 55 S.E.2d 919 (1949) (no default judgment
                 could be entered by clerk even though answer not timely filed).

       N. Carolina Nat. Bank v. Virginia Carolina Builders, 307 N.C. 563, 568, 299 S.E.2d

       629, 632 (1983).

¶ 10          Thus, Plaintiff’s appeal in this case is interlocutory and does not affect a

       substantial right. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to review this matter on

       immediate appeal. Consequently, we must dismiss Plaintiff’s appeal.
                             SULLIVAN V. PENDER COUNTY

                                    2022-NCCOA-458

                                   Opinion of the Court

                                     Conclusion

¶ 11   Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

       APPEAL DISMISSED.

       Judges DILLON and WOOD concur.