Court Opinion

ID: 9766356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 04:43:03.539271+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:21.636767
License: Public Domain

STEIN, J.,
concurring.
I concurred in Garrison v. Township of Middletown, 154 N.J. 282, 295-312, 712 A.2d 1101 (1998), because I disagreed with the Court’s holding that “a condition of public property is not dangerous unless the specific plaintiff that brought the litigation satisfies the 'threshold requirement' that he or she used due care when encountering the property.” Id. at 295, 712 A.2d 1101. (Stein, J., concurring). Because I do not read the Court’s opinion in this appeal to rest on the application of that aspect of Garrison with which I disagreed, I join in the Court’s thoughtful and persuasive opinion.