Court Opinion

ID: 4266298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-23 07:47:34.134348+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:30:58.213376
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                            NOS. WR-12,658-22 & -23 & -24 & -25

                    EX PARTE GARY WAYNE BARNES, SR., Applicant

           ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NOS. W81-01027-J(J) & W81-01105-J(K) & W81-02518-J(K) & W80-16530-J(K)
    IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three

aggravated rape offenses and burglary of a habitation and sentenced to imprisonment for life in each

cause. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Barnes v. State, Nos. 05-81-00639-CR

thru 05-81- 00642-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 31, 1982, no pet.) (not designated for publication).

        In these subsequent applications, Applicant alleges, among other things, that he has newly

discovered evidence of actual innocence. The State responds to Applicant’s allegations, in pertinent

part:
               The State believes that further factual investigation is necessary to
               determine the merit, if any, to applicant’s claim that newly discovered
               evidence establishes that he is actually innocent. This case has been
               forwarded to the Conviction Integrity Unit of the Dallas County
               District Attorney’s Office for review and investigation. The State
               requests that this Court issue an order designating the issue of actual
               innocence as the issue to be resolved in this proceeding. The State
               intends to file supplemental briefing once CIU has had the
               opportunity to investigate applicant’s claims. Pending production of
               evidence substantiating applicant’s claim, the State denies applicant’s
               allegations.

       The trial court did not issue an order designating issues. Therefore, we remand these

applications to the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to

complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

       These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 18, 2018

Do not publish.