Court Opinion

ID: 5028118
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 05:07:53.642074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:03:29.918600
License: Public Domain

The appellant was convicted for willfully neglecting and refusing to provide for the support of his child under eighteen years of age; the punishment, eighteen months in jail.
The offense was alleged to have been committed on or about August 24, 1962. The information was filed August 25, 1962.
The statement of facts is in narrative form. There are no formal bills of exception.
Rumell Montgomery testified that she and the appellant were married in 1954; that one child, Vance Lloyd Montgomery, was born of their marriage in 1955; and that they were divorced in December, 1960. The child was awarded to the custody of the mother, and the father was ordered to pay child support, but the record does not disclose the amount he was ordered to pay. She further testified that appellant, age 55, was a good welder and blacksmith, that within her knowledge he was in good health and capable of earning $100 per week and had worked in at least two blacksmith shops; that the only money she received for child support from appellant was paid through the office of the district clerk and that money contributions from the appellant were necessary for the support and maintenance of the child. She also testified that she had been employed in a drug store for about three years and her take home pay was approximately $36 per week, and that she had no other income.
The records of the district clerk reveal that from August, 1960, to May 9, 1962, the appellant paid a total of $228 for child support. According to said records no payments were made after May 9, 1962, to August 24, 1962.
Judge Sterling Williams, District Judge, testified that he granted the divorce to Rumell and Earl Montgomery, and thereafter had several hearings on the nonpayment of child support by the appellant. At one of the hearings the appellant told Judge Williams "I will not pay child support," and that he would go to jail first, for which he was held in contempt of court and placed in jail on December 19, 1961. On January 3, 1962, appellant was released from jail with the understanding that he would commence child support payments.
The appellant did not testify but offered two witnesses who testified that Vance Montgomery currently was doing fairly well in school.
Although Mrs. Montgomery testified that the appellant was a good welder and was in good health as far as she knew, and capable of making $100 per week, and had worked in two blacksmith shops, the record is barren of any evidence showing when he worked in the shops, the length of time employed, or of any money he received from work in the shops.
The evidence fails to show any period of time that the appellant was ever employed, that he had received any money, or that he had any income or assets, other than the money he contributed by payments to the district clerk. There is no showing that the money he paid was not commensurate with his ability to pay, or that after *Page 841 
such payments he had any ability to pay; and there is no affirmative evidence of his physical condition during the period here involved.
Notwithstanding the duty and moral obligation of a father to support his minor child, the conviction for the criminal offense herein cannot stand, unless the evidence is sufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the failure to support was wilful. Cardona v. State, 160 Tex.Crim. R., 273 S.W.2d 73; Marshall v. State, 166 Tex.Crim. R., 317 S.W.2d 209.
Finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Opinion approved by the Court.