Court Opinion

ID: 30246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:52:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:42.887725
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                       _______________________

                             Summary Calendar
                               No. 02-10588
                         _______________________

                           ANNIE MARIE GREEN,

                                                    Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                   versus

                 BROWNWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,

                                                     Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                       Docket No. 00-CV-2493
_________________________________________________________________

                            February 5, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

            Annie Marie Green (“Green”) comes to this court appealing

the   district   court’s   grant   of   summary   judgment    in   favor   of

defendant    Brownwood     Regional     Medical   Center     (“Brownwood”).

Although Green’s complaint is just shy of incoherent, Brownwood and

the District Court interpreted it to allege three claims: (1)

      *
          Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
hostile work environment sexual harassment; (2) race discrimination

and discharge, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; (3) and intentional infliction of

emotional distress.       Green’s brief before this court is equally

opaque.    Brownwood assumes that Green appeals the district court’s

entry of summary judgment on each of these three claims; this court

will assume the same.

              The   district   court’s       explanation      of    the   appropriate

summary    judgment    obligations     and     standards       is    correct.    Its

application of the law to the facts at hand is impeccable.                      There

is   little    this   court    could   say     to   enhance    Judge      Fitzwater’s

opinion.

              Accordingly the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                         2