Court Opinion

ID: 9405269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-27 21:00:53.362513+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:20.635851
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1070      Doc: 9         Filed: 06/26/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-1070

        PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        VALDESE WEAVER,

                             Defendant - Appellee,

                      v.

        NORTH CAROLINA; VIRGINIA; WASHINGTON, D.C.; SOUTH CAROLINA,

                             Third Party Defendants.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00251-MR)

        Submitted: June 22, 2023                                            Decided: June 26, 2023

        Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Pakuja Crystal Vang, Appellant Pro Se.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1070      Doc: 9        Filed: 06/26/2023     Pg: 2 of 3

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1070      Doc: 9         Filed: 06/26/2023    Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Pakuja Crystal Vang appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice

        her “third-party complaint.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vang v. Valdese Weaver, 1:22-cv-00251-

        MR (W.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3