Court Opinion

ID: 6518028
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:28:28.641051+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:04.609391
License: Public Domain

McCLELLAN, C. J.-
— Trial of right to property which had been levied on at the suit of Meriwether- et al. against Bandy, and claimed by Brightman & Co. under *603a mortgage executed to them by Bandy. The burden was on the plaintiffs to show the levy of a valid execution on the property.—Jackson v. Bain, 74 Ala. 328. This they failed to do. To the contrary it affirmatively appeared by the transcript of the record in the case of Meriweather et al. v. Bandy, the execution upon a supposed judgment in which was levied on this property, that no judgment was ever entered therein. What is claimed to be a judgment is the mere copy of the judge’s bench notes, stating the parties to the case, and the following: “August 18, Judgment hy default, writ of en-quiry, damages assessed at $77.65 waiver of Ex. as to personality.” This of course was no judgment, Park v. Lide, 90 Ala. 246; Baker v. Swift & Son, 87 Ala. 530; Morgan v. Flexner & Lichten, 105 Ala. 356; Pickering et al. v. Townsend et al., 23 So. Rep. 703, s. c. 118 Ala. 251, and the execution issued upon it was void. Upon this the court should have given the affirmative charge for the claimants as requested by them.
The same conclusion may be rested on the further ground that the lien of claimants’ mortgage attached to the crops here involved before the lien of the alleged execution.
The court also erred in receiving the verdict, which did not assess the value of the property.
Reversed and remanded.