Court Opinion

ID: 600955
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:23:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:49.671203
License: Public Domain

986 F.2d 1413
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Michael HEAD-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Thomas STEWART, Correctional Officer III;  Richard A.Lanham, Sr., Commissioner;  Seawall Smith, Warden,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-7189.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  February 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.  (CA-92-248-HM)
Michael Head-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Michael Head-Bey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  HeadBey v. Stewart, No. CA-92-248-HM (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED