Court Opinion

ID: 4159016
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-04-10 07:17:14.401682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:25.531532
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-60,418-04

                 EX PARTE ROBERT DARRELL BURELL, JR., Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 31312-D IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).

       Applicant was charged by indictment with one count of aggravated assault on a public

servant, one count of attempted aggravated assault on a public servant, and one count of assault on

a public servant. He apparently pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated assault on a public

servant in exchange for two thirty-year sentences, running concurrently with each other but

consecutively with a prior sentence Applicant was serving when he committed these offenses in

prison. He did not appeal his convictions.
                                                                                                       2

        Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective

assistance, rendering his guilty plea involuntary. Applicant alleges that he told trial counsel that he

wanted to plead not guilty and go to trial on the charges, but that trial counsel told him that he would

receive life sentences for all three counts and that they would be ordered to run consecutively if he

were convicted at trial.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Specifically, trial counsel shall state what advice he gave Applicant regarding the punishment ranges

applicable to each count of the indictment, and whether he advised Applicant that he would receive

three life sentences if he were convicted at trial. Trial counsel shall state whether he advised

Applicant that the sentences for each count could be ordered to run consecutively with each other

if Applicant were convicted at trial. Trial counsel shall state whether he advised Applicant to plead

guilty, and whether he was prepared to take the cases to trial if Applicant decided that he wanted to

do so. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall first supplement the habeas record with copies of the indictment,

       1
           This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
                                                                                                      3

judgments, plea papers including any written admonishments and written plea agreement, and any

other documents relevant to Applicant’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fact and

conclusions of law as to why the indictment appears to charge Applicant with attempted aggravated

assault of a public servant in Count II, but the plea documents and judgments indicate that Applicant

pleaded guilty to aggravated assault of a public servant in both Count I and Count II. The trial court

shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant’s trial

counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The

trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant

and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 5, 2017
Do not publish