Court Opinion

ID: 9379913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-16 17:08:22.093325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:05.983715
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Cartwright, 2023-Ohio-819.]

                               COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

                              EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO,                                        :

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,                  :
                                                               No. 111801
                 v.                                   :

CRYSTAL CARTWRIGHT,                                   :

                 Defendant-Appellant.                 :

                                JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

                 JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
                 RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 16, 2023

          Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
                              Case No. CR-21-666307-A

                                                Appearances:

                 Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
                 Attorney, and Samantha M. Sohl, Assistant Prosecuting
                 Attorney, for appellee.

                 Charles Ruiz-Bueno Co., LPA, and J. Charles Ruiz-Bueno,
                 for appellant.

ANITA LASTER MAYS, A.J.:

                   Plaintiff-appellant Crystal Cartwright (“Cartwright”) filed this

delayed appeal of the trial court’s sentence under S.B. 201 known as the Reagan
Tokes Law (“Reagan Tokes”) on the ground that the law is unconstitutional. We

affirm.

I.   Facts and Procedural History

                Cartwright was indicted on the following counts:

      Count One       Felonious assault of victim 1, a felony of the second-
                      degree in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1);

          Count Two   Felonious assault of victim 2, a felony of the second-
                      degree in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(2);

      Count Three Felonious assault of victim 3, a felony of the second-
                  degree in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(2);

      Count Four      Felonious assault of victim 3, a felony of the second-
                      degree in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1);

      Count Five      Discharge of a firearm on or near a prohibited premises,
                      a felony of the second-degree in violation of
                      R.C. 2923.162(A)(3); and

      Count Six       Aggravated riot, a felony of the fourth-degree in
                      violation of R.C. 2917.02(A)(2).

                One- and three-year firearm specifications under R.C. 2941.141(A)

and 2941.145(A) attached to Counts 2 through 6. The case was returned to the grand

jury after discovery, a codefendant was added, and Cartwright was reindicted for the

same counts in the instant case.

                On April 14, 2022, a jury found Cartwright not guilty of Counts 3 and

4 and she was convicted of the remaining counts. Cartwright was sentenced on

May 25, 2022. Cartwright was sentenced to a total stated sentence of a minimum of

ten years and maximum of 12 years under Reagan Tokes, and to six years on the
firearm specifications. Cartwright objected to the Reagan Tokes portion of the

sentence on the ground that the law is unconstitutional.

               Cartwright assigns as error that:

      1.      As amended by Reagan Tokes, the Ohio Revised Code’s
              sentences for appellant’s qualifying felonies violate the
              constitutions of the United States and the State of Ohio.

      2.      Whether the trial court’s mandatory use of R.C. 2967.271 of
              Reagan Tokes to give indefinite sentences for appellant’s felony
              convictions of the second degree was unconstitutional as Reagan
              Tokes is, of itself, unconstitutional and void.

               We combine these errors for ease of analysis. Cartwright argues that

Reagan Tokes violates the constitutional provisions for the (1) right to trial by jury;

(2) separation-of-powers doctrine; and (3) due process guarantees. Based on the

authority established by this court’s en banc holding in State v. Delvallie, 2022-

Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.), the challenges advanced by Cartwright

regarding the constitutional validity of Reagan Tokes have been overruled. See id.

at ¶ 17-54.

               Cartwright’s assigned errors lack merit. The trial court’s judgment is

affirmed.

      It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.

      The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

      It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
      A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27

of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

                            ______
ANITA LASTER MAYS, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J., and
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR

N.B. Administrative Judge Anita Laster Mays is constrained to apply Delvallie’s en
banc decision. For a full explanation of her analysis, see State v. Delvallie, 2022-
Ohio-470, 185 N.E.3d 536 (8th Dist.) (Laster Mays, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part).

Judge Eileen T. Gallagher joined the dissent by Judge Lisa B. Forbes in Delvallie
and would have found that R.C. 2967.271(C) and (D) of the Reagan Tokes Law are
unconstitutional.