Court Opinion

ID: 9957845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-05 15:01:20.187103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:51.953520
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-1926   Document: 83     Page: 1   Filed: 04/05/2024

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

  SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,
                  Appellants

                            v.

                      HULU, LLC,
                        Appellee
                 ______________________

  2022-1926, 2022-1927, 2022-1977, 2022-1989, 2022-2262
                 ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
 00158, IPR2021-00206, IPR2021-00219, IPR2021-00265,
 IPR2021-00308.
                  ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

    STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons,
 VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES
 CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW,
 RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG,
 KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.

    AMY LIANG, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco,
 CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M.
 BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN, BRETT JOHNSTON
Case: 22-1926     Document: 83   Page: 2   Filed: 04/05/2024

 WILLIAMSON, Newport Beach, CA NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los
 Angeles, CA.
               ______________________

 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

 ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

     PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit
 Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                         ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 5, 2024
   Date