Court Opinion

ID: 206544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-11 01:12:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:52.158107
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 10 2011

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDITH ANTONIA SCHWARTZ,                           No. 08-74292

               Petitioner,                        Agency No. A027-551-403

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

               Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted February 15, 2011 **

Before:        CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

       Edith Antonia Schwartz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      We lack jurisdiction over Schwartz’s contention that the BIA should have

tolled the filing deadline for her motion because she failed to raise that issue before

the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (this court

lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

                                           2                                    08-74292