Court Opinion

ID: 9653046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 17:37:37.852301+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:56.021635
License: Public Domain

GERALD M. SMITH, Presiding Judge,
concurring.
This appeal reaches us on the trial court’s action in sustaining defendants’ motions to dismiss. The plaintiffs petition states that the prior action “having been nonsuited on April 11,1994; this action is filed pursuant to the provisions of § 516.230, RSMo.” On the face of the petition there is no violation of the statute of limitations. The motions to dismiss were not treated as motions for summary judgment. We need go no further in reversing this case than recognizing that the petition on its face is not subject to dismissal. To that limited extent I concur in the result.