Court Opinion

ID: 9353032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-10 19:05:53.043589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:02.734340
License: Public Domain

People v Arce (2023 NY Slip Op 00067)

People v Arce

2023 NY Slip Op 00067

Decided on January 10, 2023

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: January 10, 2023

Before: Acosta, P.J., Webber, Moulton, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ. 

Ind. No. 610/19, 539/20 Appeal No. 17041 Case No. 2021-03293 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vJon Arce, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Paul A. Andersen of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), rendered July 15, 2021,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: January 10, 2023
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.