Court Opinion

ID: 8460748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 06:34:26.273311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:08.825411
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Mei Tin Xiao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because the discrepancy between Xiao’s testimony and the documentary evidence regarding the number of times his wife was forcibly sterilized goes to the heart of his claim. See id. Accordingly, Xiao’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.