Court Opinion

ID: 5787666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:03:34.187293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:09.388497
License: Public Domain

The doctrine of res judicata may be invoked in instances of claim splitting to prohibit a plaintiff from bringing an action for only part of his claim; the judgment obtained in that action would preclude him from bringing a second action for the residue of the claim (see Stoner v Culligan, Inc., 32 AD2d 170, 171-172 [1969]).
Here, however, since the issues relating to the nonpayment of the subsequent installments of the placement fee had not matured when the Civil Court action was brought for nonpayment of the first installment of the referral fee, and consequently had never been litigated, this action is not barred by res judicata (see Gelb v Hatton, 128 AD2d 501, 501-502 [1987]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.