Court Opinion

ID: 2965134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:35:52.657414+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:12:32.399475
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            United States Court of Appeals
                                For the First Circuit
                                 ____________________

          No. 97-2005

                                   JOHN E. GIFFORD,

                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

                             BRUCE STRUMPF, INC., ET AL.,

                               Defendants - Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                          ___________

                            Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                    ____________________

                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge. 
                                         _____________

                                _____________________

               Thomas R. Watson and McTeague, Higbee, MacAdam, Case, Watson
               ________________     _______________________________________
          & Cohen on brief for appellant.
          _______
               Richard W. Mulhern  and Kelly, Remmel  & Zimmerman on  brief
               __________________      __________________________
          for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                  February 10, 1998
                                 ____________________

               Per Curiam.   After due consideration of the  record and the
               Per Curiam.
               __________

          briefs in this case, we affirm the order of the district court.

               Costs to be assessed against appellant.

               Affirmed.   
               Affirmed.
               ________

                                         -2-