Court Opinion

ID: 8441328
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:38:32.561496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.477219
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Winfried and Eun Hui Ruggia appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss their state law claims for declaratory judgment, quiet title, and fraud, as well as their claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ruggia v. Washington Mutual, 719 F.Supp.2d 642 (E.D.Va.2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.