Court Opinion

ID: 9830413
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:11:32.863396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:21.728773
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant seems to lose sight of the rule that the evidence sustaining a judgment must be considered, and not that opposed to it. We assert again that there was no evidence tending to show any acts upon the part of Mrs. Lankford or Mrs. Everton that would *213lead appellant to believe that his amorous approaches would be entertained. Both women swore that they gaye no signals of invitation to appellant to make bis approaches. Their evidence must be taken as true. Mrs. Lankford swore that she' drove at a moderate rate of speed, not over 30 miles, and that must be taken as true no matter what appellant Ldeck swore. The jury evidently did not credit their testimony, and this court cannot be guided by it, but must look at the facts from the standpoint fixed by the verdict .of the jury.
There is no merit in the motion, and it is ■overruled.