Court Opinion

ID: 2870317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 03:15:51.508434+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:10.125380
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00509-CR
NO. 03-04-00510-CR

Jeremiah Felix, Appellant
&
Jeremiah Luke Felix, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURTS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
51ST & 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
NOS. A-02-0927-S & B-01-0836-S, HONORABLE TOM GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
 
In cause number A-02-0927-S, appellant Jeremiah Luke Felix pleaded guilty to
attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud.  See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.129
(West 2003).  He was adjudged guilty, sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment and a $500 fine, and
placed on community supervision.  In cause number B-01-0836-S, appellant pleaded guilty to
aggravated assault.  See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2004-05).  The court deferred
adjudication and placed him on community supervision.  The State later moved to revoke and
adjudicate.  Following a combined hearing on both motions at which appellant pleaded true to most
of the alleged violations, the court revoked probation and imposed sentence in the first cause.  The
court adjudged appellant guilty and imposed a ten-year prison sentence in the second cause.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to
examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
We affirm the order revoking community supervision in cause number A-02-0927-S
and the judgment of conviction in cause number B-01-0836-S.
 
 
                                                __________________________________________
                                                David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed:   March 10, 2005
Do Not Publish