Court Opinion

ID: 9516805
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:52:53.208756+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:19.375773
License: Public Domain

Hood, P.J.
(concurring). I concur in Judge Maher’s analysis. I write separately only because it is not clear to me from the record before us that the City of Detroit made a change in the wholesale or retail rate following the July 1, 1982, effective date of the amendment to MCL 123.141; MSA 5.2581. *405Neither parties’ brief nor the stipulation of facts address this point. The clear language of the amendatory act provides that "[t]his subsection shall take effect with the first change in wholesale or retail rate by the city or its contractual customers following the effective date of this subsection.” If, in fact, there were no rate changes during the years in question, the amendatory language did not apply and the rate charged plaintiff was proper.