Court Opinion

ID: 5620873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:35:23.207056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:24.435437
License: Public Domain

Broyles, C. J.
1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the original petition, over the objection “that there was not enough in plaintiff’s original pleading to amend by.”
2. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed, and the court properly so ruled. ' Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.

Franlc O. Tindall, for plaintiff in error.
Sutherland & Tuttle, contra.