Court Opinion

ID: 9702588
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 23:18:03.424079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:39.256614
License: Public Domain

The following opinion was filed June 30, 1964:
Per Curiam
{on motion for rehearing). In our original opinion we held that the petition of respondent Libra alleges facts which, if proved, will afford the basis of recovery under sec. 318.03 (4), Stats. Therefore, we declared that on *72aremand proceedings should be conducted to determine whether Libra can establish his claims under that statute.
In his motion for rehearing the attorney general requests this court to take judicial notice of an order purported to have been entered January 17, 1963, dismissing the claim of Libra made pursuant to sec. 318.03 (4), Stats., from which no appéal to this court has been taken. Nothing was stated in our original opinion which would preclude the attorney general from asserting a defense of res judicata in the county court upon remand pursuant to our mandate. Therefore the proper forum to raise any issue of res judicata is in the county court on remand from this court, not, in this court by motion for rehearing.
The motion for rehearing is denied, without costs.