Court Opinion

ID: 9941948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-19 21:05:03.185116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:29.014227
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

               COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

BARBARA              WALTERS,          AND      MAJOR                                           NO.       2024      CW   0137
CHILDREN              OF       BARBARA       WALTERS,
GARY           SLEDGE,          NATALIE         COUSIN
AND           DAWN    SAXTON

VERSUS

C.      SWAYZE            RIGBY,       M. D.,                                                FEBRUARY         19,        2024
CARLTON              H.    SHEELY,          M. D.,        AND
R.       SCOTT        THURSTON,             M. D.

In      Re:               C.     Swayze           Rigby,          M. D.,      and        LAMMICO,           applying         for

                          supervisory                writs,          19th         Judicial            District           Court,

                          Parish       of    East         Baton    Rouge,         No.    644004.

BEFORE:                   THERIOT,          PENZATO,            AND MILLER,            JJ.

              WRIT        NOT        CONSIDERED.                 This      writ        application           is     untimely.
The           return           date     was         February         16,     2024        at     3: 00     p. m.,      but    the
application                    was    filed electronically                        at    3: 06   p. m.        See     Rule    4-   3
of      the      Uniform             Rules      of    Louisiana            Courts       of    Appeal.

               Supplementation                       of     this           writ         application                and/ or      an

application                    for    rehearing            will      not     be        considered.         Uniform        Rules

of      Louisiana               Courts       of      Appeal,       Rules      2- 18. 7 &        4-   9.

                                                                   MRT
                                                                   AHP

              Miller,           J.,
                        deny the writ. The district court is in
                                        would

the best position to determine the admissibility of the evidence
for impeachment purposes during trial.

COURT           OF    APPEAL,          FIRST         CIRCUIT

     I ---'               4-A
              DOPW CLERK OF COURT
                     FOR       THE    COURT