Court Opinion

ID: 5558194
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:45:14.340023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:23.486760
License: Public Domain

Warner, Chief Justice.
This was a claim case, on the trial of which-, the jury, under the charge of the court, found the property subject to the execution levied thereon. A motion was made for anew trial on the several grounds alleged therein, which was overruled by the court and the claimant excepted.
It appears from the record and bill of exceptions, that on the trial of the case, the plaintiff offered in evidence ajudgment awarded by Judge Buchanan in an appeal case, which had been entered prior to the adoption of the constitution of 1868, and a fi.fa. issued thereon, which had been levied on the property claimed, against N. F. Walker, and James P. Walker, his security on the appeal, it being recited in the iudgment that there was no issuable plea filed on oath. To the admissibility of this evidence, the claimant objected and demurred to the same, on the ground that the judgment was *355void, not having been entered on the verdict of a jury. The court overruled the demurrer to the evidence thus offered by the plaintiff, and admitted the same to be read to the jury, and that is one of the grounds of error alleged in the motion for a new trial.
The question involved in this assignment of error, was decided during the present term, in the case of Walher vs. Bivins et al., and must control this case.
Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.