Court Opinion

ID: 9382346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-27 08:09:08.921022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:38.815021
License: Public Domain

In the
        Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
         at Fort Worth
      ___________________________

           No. 02-22-00178-CR
           No. 02-22-00179-CR
      ___________________________

 GRANT PATRICK LEDBETTER, Appellant

                     V.

          THE STATE OF TEXAS

   On Appeal from the 371st District Court
           Tarrant County, Texas
   Trial Court Nos. 1688753D, 1728881D

  Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth
                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Appellant Grant Patrick Ledbetter appeals the trial court’s judgments for the

offenses of assault of a peace officer and harassment of a public servant. See Tex.

Penal Code Ann. §§ 22.01(a), (b-2), 22.11. Appellant was on deferred-adjudication

community supervision for the assault when he committed the harassment offense.

The State filed a petition to adjudicate him guilty in the assault case and obtained a

grand-jury indictment for the harassment in a separate cause number. Without the

benefit of a plea bargain, appellant pleaded true to the allegation in the State’s petition

to adjudicate as well as guilty to the harassment offense. After a single hearing for

both offenses,1 the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at 8 years’ confinement

for both offenses and ordered the sentences to run concurrently.2

       Upon reviewing the records and concluding that no arguable grounds for

appeal exist, appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. See Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel’s brief and motion meet the

requirements of Anders; counsel has presented a professional evaluation of the entire

record in each case demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Id.,

       At the same hearing, appellant also pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor DWI. See
       1

Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a), (d). He has not appealed that conviction.
       2
           The trial court assessed no fines, and the judgments do not impose any costs
or fees.

                                            2
87 S. Ct. at 1400. We have independently examined the records, as is our duty upon

the filing of an Anders brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.);

see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). Appellant did

not respond to our letter giving him the opportunity to file a pro se response. The

State agreed with appointed appellate counsel’s assessment that no meritorious

grounds for appeal exist and declined to file a brief.

      After carefully reviewing the records and counsel’s brief, we agree with counsel

that these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Our independent review of

the records reveals nothing further that might arguably support the appeals. See

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State,

206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

                                                     /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

                                                         Bonnie Sudderth
                                                         Chief Justice

Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: March 23, 2023

                                            3