Court Opinion

ID: 1034624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-22 21:09:49.31217+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:09.824325
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-15980    Date Filed: 07/19/2013   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-15980
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

EDGAR V. BROUSSARD,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Alabama
                         _________________________

                                  (July 19, 2013)

Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel for Edgar V. Broussard in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 12-15980    Date Filed: 07/19/2013   Page: 2 of 2

counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Broussard’s revocation and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2