Court Opinion

ID: 9935496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:56:08.598202+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:37.737907
License: Public Domain

I joined Justice Maddox's dissent in Ex parte Oswalt, [Ms. 1950203, May 24, 1996] 686 So.2d 368 (Ala. 1996), and I am still convinced, based upon Justice Maddox's reasoning in his dissent in Oswalt, that the search and seizure in Oswalt and the search and seizure in this case were not "unreasonable." The United States and Alabama Constitutions *Page 1115 
protect individuals only from "unreasonable searches and seizures" (Amendment IV, United States Constitution) and "unreasonable seizure or searches" (Art. I, § 5, Alabama Constitution 1901).
MADDOX, J., concurs.