Court Opinion

ID: 685961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:55.564957
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1468
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Richard A. BRYANT, a/k/a Rick, a/k/a R.P., Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6493.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted August 25, 1994.Decided December 15, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CR-87-100-N, CA-94-271-N)
Richard A. Bryant, appellant pro se.  Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that vacated a fine and reduced the amount of restitution the court previously imposed.1  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.2  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Bryant, Nos.  CR-87-100-N;  CA-94-271-N (E.D. Va.  Apr. 6, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

1
 The court's action occurred in response to Appellant's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion

2
 We deny Bryant's motion for summary judgment