Court Opinion

ID: 8437936
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:27:30.689657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.632626
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marshall, No. 3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.