Court Opinion

ID: 5566400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:02:43.527238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:37.092472
License: Public Domain

Lumpkin, J.
1. The charge complained of, to the effect that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery to a common carrier is delivery to the consignee, was correct. Falvey & Co. v. Richmond, 87 Ga. 99.
2. The request to charge, while in some respects legal and pertinent, contained at its conclusion expressions calculated to confuse and mislead the jury, and was therefore properly refused; the evidence fully warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a newtrial. Judgment affirmed.
G. J. Holton & Son, for plaintiffs in error.
Graham & Parker, contra.