Court Opinion

ID: 9930207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-06 16:02:28.601985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:10:50.921298
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-2442
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                                 Detrich L. Williams

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Missouri
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: February 1, 2024
                              Filed: February 6, 2024
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Detrich Williams appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled
guilty to carjacking and firearm offenses. The plea came pursuant to a plea agreement

      1
       The Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
in which Williams waived his right to an appeal. His counsel has moved for leave to
withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

      Upon careful review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and
applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702,
704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing validity and applicability of appeal waiver de novo);
United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (enforcing
appeal waiver if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and
voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and it would not result in
miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for
appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal based on the appeal waiver and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                        ______________________________

                                          -2-