Court Opinion

ID: 5512934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 04:25:39.334116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:12.583451
License: Public Domain

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.
The defendant, as a suitor, was undoubtedly privieged from arrest: but here was not an arrest; for though the capias contained an ac etiam clause, bail was not demanded. Had hail been required, all the relief the party would have been entitled to, would have been to have been discharged on filing common bail. The indorsing of an appearance is equivalent to filing common bail. No more was therefore asked of the defendant, than this court would have required, on application to them, had he been compelled to give bail when the capias was served. This is the uniform practice of this court, (7 Johns. R. 538,) and the only exception is in favor of foreign witnesses attending our courts, in which cases the defendants are discharged absolutely. (2 Johns. R. 294. 3 Cowen, 392.)
Motion denied.