Court Opinion

ID: 9895993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-09 09:12:28.454987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:15.774911
License: Public Domain

In The
                                 Court of Appeals
                        Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                         No. 07-23-00346-CR

                        FRANKLIN CALVIN JONES, JR., APPELLANT

                                                    V.

                              THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                            On Appeal from the 264th District Court
                                      Bell County, Texas
                   Trial Court No. 83519, Honorable Paul L. LePak, Presiding

                                         November 8, 2023
                                MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
                   Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

       Appellant, Franklin Calvin Jones, Jr., appealed his theft conviction and eight-year

prison sentence. We dismiss the untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction.

       The trial court orally sentenced appellant on July 26, 2023. His motion for new trial

was due thirty days thereafter, that is, August 25, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a).

       1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
However, it was not filed until August 28, 2023. Being untimely, it did not extend the

deadline by which to perfect an appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (requiring a notice of

appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentencing or within ninety days if a timely motion

for new trial is filed). That deadline fell on August 25, 2023, as well. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal, filed on August 28, 2023, was similarly

late, and no one requested an extension of the deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b),

26.3 (permitting an appellate court to extend the appellate deadline by fifteen days if a

motion for extension is filed that reasonably explains the need for an extension).

       The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). When

the notice is untimely and the deadline has not been extended, we must dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)

(en banc).

        By letter of October 12, 2023, we notified Appellant of the consequences of his

late notice of appeal. We also directed him to show, by October 23, 2023, how the Court

has jurisdiction over the appeal. He has yet to communicate with the court.

       We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2

                                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.

       2 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to

the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07.

                                                    2