Court Opinion

ID: 5117493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-11 07:17:46.350814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:22:02.985144
License: Public Domain

Abatement Order filed October 5, 2021

                                      In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                    ____________

                              NO. 14-21-00427-CV
                                ____________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.U.D., S.L.D., A/K/A S.D., J.P.J.D., K.K.J.D., AND
                    A.E.D., II, CHILDREN

                    On Appeal from the 308th District Court
                             Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2018-37155

                             ABATEMENT ORDER

      This is an appeal from a judgment terminating the parental rights of
appellant, R.J. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal and is proceeding without
advance payment of costs. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been filed.
A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s judgment signed
September 14, 2021, has been ordered to be filed by this court.

      The clerk’s record reflects appellant was represented at trial by appointed
counsel Shirley Cornelius. The record does not reflect the trial court has granted a
motion for Cornelius to withdraw or appointed counsel on appeal. Appellant’s
brief was due September 22, 2021. No brief has been filed.
      In Texas, there is a statutory right to counsel for indigent persons in parental
termination cases. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.013(a)(1); see also In re M.S.,
115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003). If an indigent parent requests appointment of an
attorney to appeal a judgment terminating his or her parental rights, the trial court
must determine the issue of indigence. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(e). If
the court finds the parent to be indigent, or the parent is presumed indigent, the
court must appoint counsel to represent the parent on appeal. Id.; In re K.M., 98
S.W.3d 774, 776 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.). The record before this
court reflects appellant has been determined to be indigent but is not represented
by counsel on appeal. Accordingly, we issue the following order.

      We ORDER the judge of the 308th District Court to immediately conduct a
hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, and, if so,
whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. The judge shall
appoint an appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a
record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law,
and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental
clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of
the hearing, and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this
court on or before October 13, 2021.

      If appellant has appointed counsel, no hearing is required. The judge shall
see that a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order of appointment is filed
with the clerk of this court on or before October 13, 2021.

      The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
supplemental record containing the trial court’s findings and recommendations, or
alternatively the trial court’s order of appointment, is filed in this court. The court

                                          2
will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either
party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the
responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the
trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the
parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a
hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

                                      PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.

                                          3