Court Opinion

ID: 9432321
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:35:01.536813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:33.491756
License: Public Domain

Justice Scalia,
concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
Since the manner of attachment here was not a recognized procedure at common law, cf. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. *31Haslip, 499 U. S. 1, 24 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment), I agree that its validity under the Due Process Clause should be determined by applying the test we set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U. S. 319 (1976); and I agree that it fails that test. I join Parts I and III of the Court’s opinion, and concur in the judgment of the Court.