Court Opinion

ID: 9883334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 01:40:30.034937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:17.739929
License: Public Domain

*154Collins, J.,
concurring:
I concur in the result announced in this opinion and the reasons therefor with one exception. I continue to adhere to my dissent in Howard v. Sheriff, 83 Nev. 48, 422 P.2d 538 (1967). I persist in the opinion there should be no difference in the burden of proof required to hold a person without bail in a capital case from that required to bind him over for trial. In attempting to establish a difference the majority of the court has not provided any realistic, practical standard to be followed. They say there is a difference, but fail to say what it is. I fear they have injected confusion into the law where there need be none.