Court Opinion

ID: 6484759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-26 23:08:09.628597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:17.424251
License: Public Domain

OPINION OP THE COURT BY
HARTWELD, C.J.
This is a motion by the attorneys for the plaintiffs, the heirs at law of the decedent, for allowance out of the estate of a reasonable .sum for professional services and expenses in preparing and presenting the cause before the supreme court of tbe United States on appeal from the decree of this court of November 3, 1906. It appears by the affidavit of one of the *416attorneys that they prepared the record oil the appeal and a brief for the appellants; that in order to avoid the expíense of going to Washington they retained counsel there and instructed him by mail and in consultations in Honolulu; that he filed a brief in repily and presented the case at the hearing and that the attorneys piaid the costs and expienses amounting to $160.10. The attorneys suggest that $2000 in addition to the expenditure ought to be allowed. Counsel for the executors took a neutral position, declining to say anything for or against the motion. Counsel for the trustee submitted that this court has no jurisdiction to grant the motion, the cpuestion of costs in this court having been dispiosed of in the decree appealed from and the apipiellate court having made no order for piayment of counsel fees for the appieal.
G. H. Olson for executors.
W. L. Stanley for the heirs at law.
B. B. Anderson for Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd.
In a contest concerning the construction of a will it is only under very excepitional circumstances that the estate of a decedent should bear the expíense of an unsuccessful apipieal from a decree of this court. The counsel fees of the contesting heirs incurred in this court, amounting to $2000, were ordered to be paid out of the funds of the estate. The cpuestion involved in their appeal, however, was novel and important and the amount involved was very large.
Ordinarily counsel fees are determined in the first instance by the judge before whom the cause is brought, and, in case of the administration of an estate in pu’obate, by the judge before whom the pDroceedings are pending, but as the case was originally brought here by a submission upon facts agreed we exercise concurrent jurisdiction in the matter in order not to delay unnecessarily the closing of the executors’ accounts, and direct that $1500 for counsel fees and $160.10 for expenses be allowed to be paid out of the funds of the estate.