Court Opinion

ID: 9758297
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 23:19:55.305372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:49.108451
License: Public Domain

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice, dissenting. Once again, the majority concludes, as it did in Anderson v. State, 367 Ark. 536, 242 S.W.3d 229 (2006), that the circuit court did not err when it allowed the jury to take Flanagan’s recorded statements and a tape recorder or a TV/VCR into the jury room where the jury was deliberating. I must respectfully dissent in this case for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. State, supra. Corbin, J., joins this dissent.