Court Opinion

ID: 8422710
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 22:54:42.318064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:26.304183
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Tuan Quoc Duong appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(ii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Doung’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.