Court Opinion

ID: 4064585
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 21:32:10.890221+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:48.567581
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                     OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-84,007-01

                      EX PARTE PATRICK TAYLOR SHAY, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 1195055-A IN THE 337th DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of improper

photography and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was convicted pursuant to an unconstitutional statute.

See Ex parte Thompson, 442 S.W.3d 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The plea papers in this case show

that the State agreed not to file “aggravated sexual assault or any child pornography charges arising

out of [the] transaction” in exchange for Applicant’s plea. Aggravated sexual assault is a first-degree
                                                                                                        2

felony with a maximum life sentence. TEX . PENAL CODE § 22.021(e) (West 2008). Possession of

child pornography is a third-degree felony with a maximum sentence of ten years. Id. § 43.26(d).

And the State could have prosecuted the counts separately in order to obtain consecutive sentences.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 42.08 (West 2008). An aggravated sexual assault conviction would

have also subjected Applicant to sex-offender registration requirements, which is not the case with

Applicant’s plea bargained for conviction.

        We order that this application be filed and set for submission to determine whether an

applicant, who negotiates a very favorable plea agreement that results in a conviction for an offense

that is later found to be unconstitutional, is collaterally estopped from later raising this claim in an

application for a writ of habeas corpus. The parties shall brief these issues.

        It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If that is not correct, the trial court shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art

26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, a

supplemental transcript containing: a confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the

order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with

this Court on or before March 15, 2016.

Filed: December 16, 2015
Do not publish