Court Opinion

ID: 3012572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 21:08:38.456395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:30.918076
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
 

  PER CURIAM.
 

  This is an appeal of the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Consolidated Rail on the claim that plaintiff Joseph Ricciardi was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12111 et seq. Ricciardi contends the District Court erred in not applying the equitable tolling doctrine to the late filing of his EEOC charge and in finding that he was not a qualified individual with a disability.
 

  Our review of a grant of summary judgment is plenary. In order to sustain a claim, ADA plaintiffs must file an EEOC charge within 300 days of the alleged improper employment practice. Here, plaintiff filed an EEOC charge on March 23, 1998, more than 300 days after he was terminated on July 23, 1996. We agree with the District Court that “[tjhere is no evidence of Ricciardi’s timely filing a charge (rather than an intake questionnaire) with the EEOC, of an extraordinary circumstance preventing him from timely filing a charge with the EEOC, or of due diligence on his part. Nor are there present other factors mandating the application of equitable tolling.” (District Court September 29, 2000 Opinion at 11). Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted on the grounds that Ricciardi failed to file a timely charge.
 

  For these reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s grant of summary judgment.