Court Opinion

ID: 9748663
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 16:09:19.040343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:30.242275
License: Public Domain

ELDRIDGE, Judge,
dissenting:
Although there may be good reasons for requiring further circuit court proceedings in this case, I cannot agree with the Court’s opinion which reaffirms Knill v. Knill, 306 Md. 527, 510 A.2d 546 (1986), and with the Court’s judgment which requires further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. I continue to adhere to the principles set forth in Chief Judge Murphy’s dissent in Knill v. Knill, supra, 306 Md. at 539-554, 510 A.2d at 552-560, which was joined by Judge Smith and myself.