Court Opinion

ID: 2948242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 05:04:56.192897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:54.392632
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-79,072-01

IN RE JAMES IRVIN QUICK, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 1179074 IN THE 228th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant
to the original jurisdiction of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of
habeas corpus in the 228th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and
that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.  On March 6, 20123, this Court held
in abeyance and ordered the district clerk to respond as to why the habeas application had not been
forwarded to this Court.  
	On April 8, 2013, this Court received the district clerk's response, which included a copy of
a timely entered order designating issues signed by the trial court on March 12, 2012.  This Court
still has not received Relator's habeas application from the district court.
	Respondent, the Judge of the 228th District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with
this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application.  In the
alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have
the District Clerk submit the record on such application.  In either case, Respondent's answer shall
be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.  This application for leave to file a writ of
mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: May 8, 2013
Do not publish