Court Opinion

ID: 5029385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 05:16:36.46571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:05.532737
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-21-00023-CV
                               __________________

 ROBIN ROUSE AND SABRINA ROUSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE
   PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TERRILL
             SCATENA, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

                                         V.

 THOMAS CAMPBELL, CHRISTY W. KOLVA, ISABELLE CAMPBELL,
 AND ASHLEY GATES, FOSTER MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND FOSTER
 TIMBER, LTD, Appellees/Cross-Appellants; J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A.,
          AND NEIL CAMPBELL, Appellees/Cross-Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 284th District Court
                     Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 18-12-15871-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                                     ORDER

      Robin Rouse and Sabrina Rouse, appellants, filed a motion for review of the

trial court’s September 20, 2021, supersedeas order, which set the amount of security

required to stay execution on the judgment at $3,186,522.53 and limited the duration

of a supersedeas bond to thirty days or less. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a). Appellants

                                         1
request a temporary stay freezing any sales of the property at issue in this litigation,

or any enforcement of the final judgment until further order of this Court. See Tex.

R. App. P. 24.4(c).

      The Court finds that temporary relief is necessary to preserve the parties’

rights. This Court temporarily stays the sale of the property at issue and any further

enforcement of the final judgment, until this Court rules on the motion for review of

the trial court’s supersedeas order. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(c).

      Appellants’ motion for review remains pending before the Court. Appellees’

response to the motion for review is due October 8, 2021.

      ORDER ENTERED September 28, 2021.

                                                            PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                           2