Court Opinion

ID: 5963312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:06:34.068195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:12.155424
License: Public Domain

Plaintiff failed to take any action to seek relief from the dismissal order until a year after it was issued (see Forbes v New York City Tr. Auth., 88 AD3d 546 [1st Dept 2011]). While a court retains discretionary power to vacate a default judgment in the interest of justice, even when the motion is made more than a year after service of notice of entry, “that discretion should not be exercised where, as here, the moving party has demonstrated a lack of good faith, or been dilatory in asserting its rights” (Greenwich Sav. Bank v JAJ Carpet Mart, 126 AD2d 451, 452 [1st Dept 1987]).
In any case, plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse and the legal merit of her asserted claim (see Benson Park Assoc., LLC v Herman, 73 AD3d 464 [1st Dept 2010]). Counsel’s explanation that an unnamed attorney had appeared on the return date of the motion to request an adjournment and also appeared at a status conference scheduled in the courtroom was denied in a sworn statement by defendant’s counsel. The complaint verified by counsel and the affirmation submitted by counsel in support of another motion are not made by a person with personal knowledge and, moreover, fail to provide specifics of the fraud and other claims (see Paez v 1610 St. Nicholas Ave. L.P., 103 AD3d 553, 554 [1st Dept 2013]; Peacock v Kalikow, 239 AD2d 188, 190 [1st Dept 1997]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.