Court Opinion

ID: 8678537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:43:02.812005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.292643
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13-cv-00286-JRS, 2015 WL 1526226 (E.D.Va. Apr. 3, 2015; June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.