Court Opinion

ID: 2717930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-13 21:04:04.552883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:02:19.575349
License: Public Domain

Augustin v Park Slope Assoc. NY, LLC (2014 NY Slip Op 05759)
Augustin v Park Slope Assoc. NY, LLC
2014 NY Slip Op 05759
Decided on August 13, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on August 13, 2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentTHOMAS A. DICKERSON, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

2012-11012
 (Index No. 32103/09)

[*1]Daniel Augustin, appellant, 
vPark Slope Associates NY, LLC, et al., respondents.
Menez Jean-Jerome, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the plaintiff to be the owner of certain real property, in effect, to set aside a deed, and to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated July 16, 2012, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Park Slope Associates NY, LLC, upon that defendant's failure to appear or answer the complaint and, in effect, for summary judgment declaring him to be the owner of certain real property and to set aside a deed, and vacated all stays in the action.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We affirm the Supreme Court's denial of the plaintiff's motion, but on grounds different from those relied upon by the Supreme Court. The plaintiff claims that the defendants obtained title to the subject premises from him through fraud. In support of those branches of his motion which were, in effect, for summary judgment declaring him to be the owner of the subject real property and to set aside a deed, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of fraud so as to satisfy his initial burden (see generally Cash v Titan Fin. Servs., Inc., 58 AD3d 785). In light of the plaintiff's failure to satisfy his prima facie burden, these branches of the plaintiff's motion were properly denied, regardless of the sufficiency of the papers submitted by the defendant Steve Casholo, Inc., in opposition (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Moore v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc., 117 AD3d 695, 696).
That branch of the plaintiff's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Park Slope Associates NY, LLC, also was properly denied. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate his entitlement to enter a default judgment against that defendant (see GMAC v Minewiser, 115 AD3d 707).
DICKERSON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, COHEN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court