Court Opinion

ID: 5787598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:03:24.636985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:04.043178
License: Public Domain

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from an order of .the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 15, 1972, which granted plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, child custody and support, and a counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs. Any seeming inequity in a temporary order for alimony and support is to be remedied by a speedy trial where the rights of the parties can be finally determined (Mezzasalma v. Mezmsalma, 40 A D 2d 1018; Fleisig v. Fleisig, 4() A D 2d 609). Defendant, of course, is not precluded from making any application to Special Term with respect to visitation that he may deem appropriate. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.