Court Opinion

ID: 46433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:58:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:39.294360
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                November 9, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-41814
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS RANGEL-PUENTE,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 5:05-CR-944
                      --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos

Rangel-Puente raises arguments that are foreclosed by United

States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which

held that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not

render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face.     The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.