Court Opinion

ID: 9686372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:45:26.656877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:49:02.025537
License: Public Domain

DIXON, Justice
(concurring).
I concur in the opinion of the majority, with this exception: I cannot agree that “Constance is not.entitled to participate in that portion of the settlement funds that compensate Acy for damages accruing after the dissolution of the community regime.” What Constance owned was her community interest in the cause of action. ' The cause of action was the property acquired during the marriage. The value of the cause of action is affected by Acy’s future-losses', but that does not diminish Constance’s one-*271‘half community interest in the cause of .action.