Court Opinion

ID: 9649712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 15:07:00.624889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:14.260228
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed August 23, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1689
                      Lower Tribunal No. 20-4274 CC
                           ________________

                             Jerry Fernandez,
                                 Appellant,

                                     vs.

                     Stanley I. Foodman, P.A., etc.,
                                 Appellee.

     An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Gordon
Murray, Judge.

     Jerry Fernandez, in proper person.

     The Foodman Firm, P.A., and Daniel Foodman and Raymond S.
Boyle, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Lloyd S. Meisels, P.A. v. Dobrofsky, 341 So. 3d 1131,

1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (“Because the defendants failed to file a response

with their supporting factual position, as required under the amended rule,

the trial court was permitted to consider the facts set forth in the plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment as ‘undisputed for purposes of the motion.’”);

Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(e)(2) (“If a party fails to properly support an assertion of

fact or fails to properly address another party’s assertion of fact as required

by rule 1.510(c), the court may . . . consider the fact undisputed for purposes

of the motion.”).

                                        2