Court Opinion

ID: 8064505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:43:26.082243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:09.914021
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for . the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in tile case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.
For affirmance — Tite Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yredenbuegi-i, Congdon, Teri-iunE, Heppeni-ieimer, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.