Court Opinion

ID: 8430859
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 06:42:05.688054+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:36.759470
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
James Chester Perkins appeals the district court’s order substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perkins v. Orr, No. CA-04-835-9-8 (D.S.C. July 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED