Court Opinion

ID: 4856175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-24 20:42:17.888103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:05.160895
License: Public Domain

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court's judgment on remand in this case, see Alabama Alcoholic Beverage ControlBoard v. Henri-Duval Winery, L.L.C., 890 So.2d 70
(Ala. 2004), except to the extent that the trial court determined that Henri-Duval Winery, L.L.C., has not been a "prevailing party" for purposes of recovering *Page 1150 
an attorney fee pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. See,e.g., Grier v. Goetz, 421 F.Supp.2d 1061, 1068-69
(M.D.Tenn. 2006) (discussing relevant United States Supreme Court precedents); James v. Alabama Coal for Equity,Inc., 713 So.2d 937, 947 (Ala. 1997) (quoting TexasState Teachers' Ass'n v. Garland Indep. Sch. Dist.,489 U.S. 782, 789, 109 S.Ct. 1486, 103 L.Ed.2d 866 (1989)).
LYONS and WOODALL, JJ., concur.