Court Opinion

ID: 8609844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 07:18:38.086567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:19.739345
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
James Lee Humphrey appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *786L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Humphrey’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.