Court Opinion

ID: 9914400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-31 09:11:13.12458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:12:24.002601
License: Public Domain

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2023

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-23-00796-CR

                   ERNEST HENRY WALKER, Appellant

                                        V.
                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
                             Ellis County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2210493

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s order dismissing the case
against appellant. In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they
are authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal
defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d
316, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). A “final judgment” is a “final judgment of
conviction,” which is defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure as “the written
declaration of the court signed by the trial judge and entered of record showing the
conviction or acquittal of the defendant.” Raley v. State, 441 S.W.3d 647, 650
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet ref’d.); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.
42.01 § 1. Appellant was not convicted or acquitted. The State filed a motion to
dismiss the case which the trial court granted.

      On November 15, 2023, this court notified appellant that we lacked
jurisdiction over the appeal and that it was subject to dismissal without further
notice unless appellant demonstrated, within 21 days, that the court has
jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response.

      Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule
that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no
jurisdiction.

      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

                                       PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

                                           2