Court Opinion

ID: 2670287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-18 00:01:01.711208+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:33.541173
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20332      Document: 00512598039         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/16/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 13-20332
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            April 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROLANDO EUCEDA-LOPEZ, also known as Rolando Euceda, also known as
Molojo Palmarez, also known as Rolando Lopez Euceda, also known as Rolando
Euceda Lopez, also known as Edgardo David Castillo-Castellano, also known
as Edgardo David Castillo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:10-CR-214-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rolando Euceda-
Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Euceda-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20332    Document: 00512598039    Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/16/2014

                                No. 13-20332

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2