Court Opinion

ID: 6539570
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:14:30.465942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:46.856172
License: Public Domain

Compton, J. This case is brought here by appeal from the Madison circuit court. The action was assumpsit, and the declaration contained a count for money had and received. At the trial — which was before the court sitting without a jury — the plaintiff introduced a witness, who testified that the defendant told him that he— the defendant — had stolen or taken two mules from the plaintiff, had sold them for seventy or eighty dollars each, and had received the money; and that, at the same time, the plaintiff asked the defendant if he did not think he ought to pay for the mules, and the defendant said he thought not. This was all the evidence introduced on either side; and upon this state of facts the court declared the law to he, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and rendered judgment accordingly. This was erroneous. Where a person has tortiously obtained the possession of the goods of another, and sold them and received the proceeds, as was clearly shown in this case, the owner may, if he chooses to do so, waive the tort, and bring assumpsit for the price received. Bowman v. Browning, 17 Ark., 599. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.