Court Opinion

ID: 9521726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 02:10:41.844152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:32.072137
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, Justice,
concurring specially.
[¶ 14] I understand this to be a failure-of-proof case. The statute is clearly intended to prevent expensive highway, road, and street damage. Even though the exhibits appear to reflect damage to the road by the loaded tractor-trailer being located on it, the statute requires that the vehicle moved on the road or street. The legislature could address this by prohibiting an overweight vehicle from being parked or located on the highway, road, or street, in addition to the present prohibition on one being moved.
[¶ 15] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., concurs.