Court Opinion

ID: 667366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:20:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:53.962523
License: Public Domain

21 F.3d 425NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Eddie Lee GIST, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-7257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 17, 1994.Decided:  March 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, District Judge.  (CR-89-168-C, CA-93-282-R)
Eddie Lee Gist, appellant pro se.
Joseph William Hooge Mott, Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Gist, Nos.  CR-89-168-C;  CA-93-282-R (W.D. Va.  Oct. 28, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Because the motions, files, and record conclusively showed that Gist was not entitled to relief, the district court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing.   Fontaine v. United States, 411 U.S. 213, 215 (1973)