Court Opinion

ID: 9410600
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-22 00:00:38.046683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:58.885368
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-60285   Document: 00516829528       Page: 1   Date Filed: 07/21/2023

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit
                              ___________                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                      Fifth Circuit

                               No. 21-60285
                                                                    FILED
                                                                July 21, 2023
                              ___________
                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
   Tesla, Incorporated,                                             Clerk

                                                Petitioner Cross-Respondent,

   International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and
   Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO,

                                                                     Petitioner,

                                   versus

   National Labor Relations Board,

                                       Respondent Cross-Petitioner.
                 ______________________________

                  Petition for Review from an Order of the
                       National Labor Relations Board
                    NLRB Order No. 370 NLRB No. 101
                 ______________________________

            ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

            (Opinion March 31, 2023, 5 Cir., 2023, 63 F.4th 981)

   Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
   Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
   Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas,
   Circuit Judges.
Case: 21-60285      Document: 00516829528           Page: 2    Date Filed: 07/21/2023

                                     No. 21-60285

   Per Curiam:
          A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
   rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
   and not disqualified having voted in favor,
          IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
   banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
   specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
   5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated March 31, 2023, is
   VACATED.

                                          2