Court Opinion

ID: 6003047
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 10:07:06.873789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:12.262821
License: Public Domain

Material questions of fact remain as to whether the plaintiff John R. Elter suffered a "serious injury” as defined by Insuranee Law § 5102 (d) and whether the injury was proximately caused by the accident (see, Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774; Petrone v Thornton, 166 AD2d 513; Gokey v Castine, 163 AD2d 709; Partlow v Meehan, 155 AD2d 647; Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on these issues. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.