Court Opinion

ID: 685910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:12.456128
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1466
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Linwood R. T. GARRETT, Plaintiff Appellant,Gladys M. GARRETT, Plaintiff,v.Robert A. CANFIELD, Esquire, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-1813.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 1994.Decided Nov. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  James R. Spencer, District Judge.  (CA-93-835-R, BK-81-00579-R)
Linwood R. T. Garrett, appellant Pro Se.  Robert A. Canfield, appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order allowing the claim of McCaul, Grigsby and Pearsall.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Garrett v. Canfield, Nos.  CA-93-835-R;  BK-81-00579-R (E.D. Va.  May 25, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.