Court Opinion

ID: 6674593
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:14:47.602693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:00:39.954007
License: Public Domain

Deed conveying land in this state to W., in trust for E., a daughter of grantor, for life, with limitations over. W. died, and upon the ex parte petition of E. and her husband, who had removed to Arkansas, M. was appointed by the Court of Chancery in Arkansas, trustee in the place of W., deceased; but no certificate of appointment and substitution ivas endorsed upon the deed, nor recorded. Action brought by M. in this state to recover the possession of this land and for rents and damages. The Circuit judge (Kershaw) granted a non-suit on defendant’s motion. An appeal from this j udgment was dismissed, this court holding that the plaintiff could not be invested with title to lands in this state by the action had in the courts of Arkansas; and, moreover, that the requirements of the act of 1796, (5 Stat. 277; ■ Gen. Stat., oh. XCIII, § 10,) had not been complied with. Opinion by
Aldrich, A. A. J.,