Court Opinion

ID: 5541119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:37:28.100386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:50.336101
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal by the Herberts dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order does not finally determine *838action No. 1 within the meaning of the Constitution. The order appealed from in action No. 1 does not resolve plaintiffs’ claim against Dorothy Mollicone, and her cross claim against defendants Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc. and Errol K. Miller has never been dismissed. Accordingly, claims remain pending with respect to all parties in action No. 1. On appeal by plaintiff Dorothy Mollicone in action No. 2, order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment in action No. 2 denied, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (202 AD2d 886, 888).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.