Court Opinion

ID: 2956530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-17 01:38:06.220711+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:35.698893
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                        NO. 03-13-00523-CV

                                     In re Frank E. Parramore

                      ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

                Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had

not timely ruled on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, since relator filed his petition,

the trial court has acted on the petition. Because relator has received a ruling on his habeas petition,

which was the same relief he sought via his mandamus proceeding, we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

                                                __________________________________________

                                                David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Filed: August 30, 2013