Court Opinion

ID: 8213910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-13 19:07:26.79456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:25.836052
License: Public Domain

Guzman v Americare, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 05752)

Guzman v Americare, Inc.

2022 NY Slip Op 05752

Decided on October 13, 2022

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 13, 2022

Before: Kapnick, J.P., Webber, González, Kennedy, JJ. 

Index No. 24877/18E Appeal No. 16418 Case No. 2022-01314 

[*1]Laury Vasquez Guzman, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Respondent,
vAmericare, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Does #1-10, Defendants.

Peckar & Abramson, P.C., New York (Kevin J. O'Connor of counsel), for appellants.
Law Office of William Coudert Rand, New York (William C. Rand of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2022, which denied defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer to the first amended class action complaint to include an affirmative defense asserting additional constitutional defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants sought to add an affirmative defense asserting that the class, as defined, violated their due process rights. The proposed defense, however, was in clear contravention of this Court's prior determination that plaintiff was entitled to class certification (Guzman v Americare, Inc., 202 AD3d 504, 504 [1st Dept 2022], lv dismissed 38 NY3d 1156 [2022]). Thus, the proposed defense is patently devoid of merit (see MBIA Ins. Corp. v Greystone & Co. Inc., 74 AD3d 499, 499 [1st Dept 2010]). Moreover, plaintiff would be prejudiced if defendants were permitted to challenge the class certification again at this late stage in the litigation (see Kocourek v Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., 85 AD3d 502, 505 [1st Dept 2011]).
We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 13, 2022