Court Opinion

ID: 5954382
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 06:32:51.620287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:53.605926
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.