Court Opinion

ID: 993731
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:11:59.692694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:28.405003
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6997

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSEPH E. PURCELL, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-94-320-JFM, CR-94-396-JFM, CA-97-1258-JFM)

Submitted:   November 18, 1997            Decided:   December 9, 1997

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Purcell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Purcell, Nos. CR-94-320-JFM; CR-94-396-JFM;
CA-97-1258-JFM (D. Md. July 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2