Court Opinion

ID: 3169740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-14 19:06:15.212559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:48.006516
License: Public Domain

People v Diakite (2016 NY Slip Op 00267)

People v Diakite

2016 NY Slip Op 00267

Decided on January 14, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 14, 2016

Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

16658 2624/12

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vMady Diakite, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered July 22, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of forgery devices (two counts) and scheme to defraud in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2½ to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant, who contends that his plea was involuntary because the court never advised him that he could be deported as a result of his plea (see People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168 [2013]), has not established that the exception to the preservation requirement set forth in Peque (id. at 182-183) should apply. The record demonstrates that defendant knew of his potential deportation, by virtue of the notice of immigration consequences served upon him and the prosecutor's application for an increase in bail due to defendant's prior federal conviction for bank fraud and the fact that he was not a United States citizen. Review of defendant's unpreserved claim in the interest of justice is unwarranted, because the circumstances of the plea render it highly unlikely that defendant could make the requisite showing of prejudice under Peque (id. at 198-201) if granted a hearing.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 14, 2016
CLERK