Court Opinion

ID: 1451412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:13:46.661526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:08:29.587818
License: Public Domain

276 S.W.3d 881 (2009)
Charles MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90905.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
February 10, 2009.
*882 Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Cory Lee Atkins, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles Martin appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).