Court Opinion

ID: 9452550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 17:44:00.549172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:33:15.698760
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Eehearing
The record in this case shows that the Court conducted a probation hearing and granted probation to the co-defendant, Peurbacher, without actual imprisonment. The other defendants, including Heidrich, received split sentences —probation and imprisonment. In these circumstances it is apparent that the district court did not consider that the policy of requiring jail time for all defendants convicted of income tax evasion was an inflexible rule having the effect, as suggested in the dissent, of amending 18 U.S.C. § 3651. It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause is hereby denied.