Court Opinion

ID: 2918453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 23:19:15.626774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:06.680793
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-09-00166-CV

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

            TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                           TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT GUEVARA,                                            §    APPEAL FROM THE
APPELLANT

V.                                                         §    COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF

GAY ANN GUEVARA,
APPELLEE                                          § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS
                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             PER CURIAM
         This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was
due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., June 4, 2009. See TEX . R. APP. P.
32.1. On June 4, 2009, this court notified Appellant that he should file a docketing statement
immediately if he had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified
Appellant that the filing fee was due on or before June 15, 2009.
         Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our June 4, 2009
letter, this court issued a second notice on July 1, 2009 advising Appellant that the docketing
statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was due
to have been paid on or before June 15, 2009, but had not been received. See TEX . R. APP. P. 5. The
notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before
July 13, 2009, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee have passed,
and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice,
to comply with Rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
Opinion delivered July 24, 2009.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

                                                    (PUBLISH)