Court Opinion

ID: 29690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:43:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:04.503473
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-10564
                         Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOE BAILEY PEACOCK,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:02-CR-30-1-A
                       --------------------
                         December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Joe Bailey Peacock has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).   Peacock has received a copy of

counsel's motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief

of his own.    Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.      Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 02-10564
                               -2-

from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.