Court Opinion

ID: 6323377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-15 16:01:48.133078+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:36.121799
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-1473   Document: 51     Page: 1   Filed: 03/14/2022

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

     INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.,
                   Appellant

                            v.

                AURIS HEALTH, INC.,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                       2021-1473
                 ______________________

     Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-
 01173.
                  ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

     JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson,
 Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued
 for   appellant.     Also    represented by    ARPITA
 BHATTACHARYYA; FRANK A. DECOSTA, III, Washington, DC;
 ROBERT KING HIGH, III, Atlanta, GA.

    CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY,
 argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY
 BROUGHAN, III, RYAN C. MORRIS, Washington, DC; PAUL J.
 ROGERSON, Chicago, IL.
Case: 21-1473     Document: 51   Page: 2    Filed: 03/14/2022

                   ______________________

 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

 ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

     PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit
 Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

        March 14, 2022           /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
            Date                 Peter R. Marksteiner
                                 Clerk of Court