Court Opinion

ID: 5918659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:21:21.857676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:18.261236
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), imposed October 21, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.