Court Opinion

ID: 9642454
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 17:58:31.72079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:48.002653
License: Public Domain

DENMAN and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges
(concurring).
We concur in the opinion of Judge WILBUR, save as to the last paragraph thereof. We hold with respect to the provision regarding the Red Cross Blood Bank, as follows:
We do not consider, and we make no intimation regarding, the power of this court to review the terms of a probationary order. We withhold any ruling *416upon that question because no objection was made to the order and because we regard the requirement that “a pint of blood” be given as invading the physical person in an unwarranted manner and void on its face. It may be entirely disregarded. It would appear that the trial Judge understood the appellant to consent to do this beneficent act, but the record does not support this conclusion.