Court Opinion

ID: 6394425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 00:22:39.877552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:50:50.571323
License: Public Domain

CREAMER, Attorney General,
You have requested my opinion of whether an elector who has properly registered for the impending election should be denied the right to vote absentee because a part of his or her registration record was lost during the June flood.
It is my opinion, and you are formally advised, that an elector should not be deprived of the right to vote absentee because of the loss of some part of the registration records during the June flood.
Under the circumstances presented, all the voter signature cards and “Permanent Voter Registration” forms of voters in Luzerne County were lost as a result of flooding of the County Court House. A record of the names and addresses of electors who had been properly registered did survive. The legislature has facilitated replacement of lost records of some registered voters by allowing them to complete such records until the closing of the polls on Election Day. See Act No. 1, Special Session No. 2, 1972, October 6, 1972.
*404However, the legislature failed to make any provision to replace the lost records of registered voters who are unable to physically return to the court house or polling place before Election Day. A number of voters had properly registered before the time the records were destroyed, anticipating they would be unable to return before or on Election Day. Such individuals registered in the knowledge that, once properly registered, existing Pennsylvania Law permits an absentee elector to make application for an absentee ballot and vote by mail. Section 20, et seq., Act of August 13, 1963, P. L. 707, as amended, 25 PS §3146.1, et seq.
There is no legal basis to deprive these individuals, shown to be registered in surviving records, of the right to vote absentee solely because of their present inability to physically return to the voting district to replace records lost through an unavoidable general catastrophe.
Local election officials of Luzerne County are to be instructed that loss of some part of an elector’s registration record is not a basis for refusing to process an absentee ballot application of such an elector, if the elector’s name and address appear on surviving election records as having been properly registered. Enclosed with the absentee ballot sent to such voters must be a “Permanent Voter Registration” form and signature card to be filled out by the voter to replace the lost records. Additionally, the voter should be required to affirm that he or she is eligible to vote and will vote only by the enclosed absentee ballot. Such documents must be notarized.
Of course, the regular statutory safeguards to protect the security of the ballot will fully apply to those absentee ballots. For example, see section 2, Act of July 25, 1913, P. L. 1043, as amended, 25 PS §292; section 20, Act of April 29, 1937, P. L. 487, as amended, 25 PS *405§951-20; section 36, Act of April 29, 1937, P. L. 487, as amended, 25 PS §951-36; section 417, Act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, as amended, 25 PS §2687; section 1850, et seq., Act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 133, as amended, 25 PS §3550, et seq.