Court Opinion

ID: 1026337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:04:58.937676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:59.013315
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Kenneth R. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to file a belated direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Patterson,
  
  No. 3:05-cr-00048-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.