Court Opinion

ID: 4376709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-14 00:00:18.929487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:37.711143
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-11137      Document: 00514871587         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/13/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-11137                                 FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                       March 13, 2019
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRYCE CLAIR CLARK,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:18-CR-12-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Bryce Clair Clark has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Clark has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Clark’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11137   Document: 00514871587    Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/13/2019

                               No. 18-11137

appellate review. Accordingly, Clark’s motion for appointment of new counsel
on appeal is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2