Court Opinion

ID: 5693340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:30:28.707613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:11.305452
License: Public Domain

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward M. Davidowitz, J.), rendered October 29, 1999, as amended March 16, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of a contemporaneous uncharged drug sale. In addition to being relevant to defendant’s intent to sell (see e.g. People v Mendoza, 245 AD2d 177 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 975 [1998]), this evidence provided a complete narrative of the events leading to defendant’s arrest, and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect (see e.g. People v Pressley, 216 AD2d 202 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 800 [1995]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People “were not bound to stop after presenting minimum evidence” (People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 245 [1987]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.