Court Opinion

ID: 9826330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 15:45:26.126998+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:00.558078
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Hydrick.
I concur in the result. We have held in several cases that, on appeal from a magistrate’s Court, where the procedure is informal, an exception “that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence” is sufficient, and, therefore, I think it is sufficient to call for consideration in this case; especially as it was clearly intended to make the point that, under the evidence, the tenancy was *233from year to year, as a matter of law, and, therefore, the judgment of eviction ivas wrong. But the evidence as to the nature of the tenancy—whether from year to year, or by the year—was conflicting, and, therefore, we are bound by the judgment of the Court below.
Mr. Justice Fraser concurs with Mr. Justice Hydrick.