Court Opinion

ID: 714152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:47:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:53:12.948142
License: Public Domain

78 F.3d 160
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William Joseph KIRK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50472.
United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.
March 5, 1996.

E.G. Morris, Morris & Florey, Austin, TX, for Appellant.
Mark R. Stelmach, Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., James H. DeAtley, Acting U.S. Atty., San Antonio, TX, for Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas;  Sam Sparks, Judge.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion November 7, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 791)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1
A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.   The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.