Court Opinion

ID: 9543267
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:43:49.574616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:10:02.722798
License: Public Domain

McCOMB, J.
I dissent. It is my view that the findings and rulings of respondent Industrial Accident Commission were made after careful consideration of the entire record, in which there was conflicting evidence and a question as to the credibility of witnesses, that they were based on substantial evidence, and, therefore, the record supports the conclusions of the commission.
Schauer, J., concurred.
Respondents’ petitions for a rehearing were denied April 17, 1962. Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and McComb, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.