Court Opinion

ID: 7905009
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:59:31.379975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:32:23.394133
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff commenced this action before a justice of the peace against E. C. Adams to recover $193.08, and garnisheed Will Weaverling, who answered that he had no funds or property belonging to the defendant. The plaintiff gave notice, under section 44 of the justice’s civil code (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 7739), that the answer was unsatisfactory, and demanded a trial of the truth of the answer. The trial was had before a jury, which returned a verdict to the effect that the garnishee was indebted to the defendant in the sum of $150.90. The justice of the peace ordered and adjudged that the garnishee forthwith pay that amount into court to apply on the judgment against E. C. Adams, and that the garnishee pay the costs from the time of filing his answer, for all of which it was ordered that execution issue against the property of the garnishee. The defendant and the garnishee appealed from the judgment against the garnishee to the district court. That appeal was dismissed on the application of the plaintiff. From the order dismissing the appeal to the district court the garnishee, Will Weaverling, appeals to this court. Was the order made by the justice of the peace against *671the garnishee appealable? To answer this question requires an examination of the statute providing for appeals from judgments of justices of the peace, and of the statutes prescribing the' procedure in garnishment proceedings before justices of the peace. Section 120 of the justice’s civil code reads:
“In all cases not otherwise specially provided for by law, either party may appeal from the final judgment of any justice of the peace to the district court of the county where the judgment was rendered.” (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 7823.)
It has been held that an order made by a justice of the peace directing a garnishee to pay money into court is not a final order. (Board of Education v. Scoville, 13 Kan. 17; Fitch v. Fire Insurance Co., 23 Kan. 366; Mull v. Jones, 33 Kan. 112, 5 Pac. 388; Mo. Pac. Rly. Co. v. Reid & Holladay, 34 Kan. 410, 8 Pac. 846; Lamb v. Taylor, 101 Kan. 642, 168 Pac. 673; Madden v. Pfeifer, 106 Kán. 500.) In order for the plaintiff to recover a judgment against the garnishee, he must proceed under section 43 of the justice’s civil code (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 7738). Until judgment has been rendered in such an action, the plaintiff has no judgment against the garnishee, and execution cannot be legally levied on the property of the garnishee to satisfy the order made by the justice of the peace in the garnishment proceeding. It follows that the order made by the justice of the. peace on the trial of the truth of the answer made.by the garnishee was not a final judgment from which an appeal could be taken. The appeal was, therefore, properly dismissed.
The judgment is affirmed.