Court Opinion

ID: 8449972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:49:14.708839+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.637643
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Carlton Lamont Murdock appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murdock, No. 7:08-cr-00010-JCT-l (W.D.Va. Dec. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.