Court Opinion

ID: 576749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:45.764840
License: Public Domain

955 F.2d 40
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Bruce Andrew AINSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-6685.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.Decided Feb. 13, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond, No. CA-91-382-3, Richard L. Williams, District Judge.
Bruce Andrew Ainsley, appellant pro se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Bruce Andrew Ainsley seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.   Ainsley v. Smith, No. CA-91-382-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.