Court Opinion

ID: 1000123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:35:29.599897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:14.535994
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 99-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHRISTOPHER ROSEBORO,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CR-94-34-B, CA-98-74-B)

Submitted:   October 8, 1999                 Decided:   Octoer 26, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Carmina Szunyog Hughes, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Christopher Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Roseboro, Nos. CR-94-34-

B; CA-98-74-B (D. Md. Apr. 16, 1999).       We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2