Court Opinion

ID: 2651409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-01-28 19:52:25.957686+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:55.120650
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 13-7659

RANDALL LEE CONRAD,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

WARDEN DREW; OFFICER SMITH, Kitchen Staff,

                Defendants – Appellees,
          and

FCI BENNETTSVILLE,

                Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.      R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (5:12-cv-01288-RBH)

Submitted:   January 23, 2014              Decided:   January 28, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se.      Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

             Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We   have    reviewed   the   record   and    find   no    reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.      Conrad v. Drew, No. 5:12-cv-01288-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 12,

2013).      We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions    are   adequately     presented     in   the   materials

before   this   court   and   argument     would   not    aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                       2