Court Opinion

ID: 9905217
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-28 21:11:50.201436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:11.881517
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                                MIDDLE DISTRICT

 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                    : No. 200 MAL 2023
                                                  :
                      Respondent                  :
                                                  : Petition for Allowance of Appeal
                                                  : from the Order of the Superior Court
               v.                                 :
                                                  :
                                                  :
 RASHEED MUHAMMAD,                                :
                                                  :
                      Petitioner                  :

                                         ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

             Was the evidence insufficient to support Petitioner’s
             conviction for firearms not to be carried without a license, 18
             Pa.C.S. § 6106, where the jury made a specific factual finding
             that Petitioner did not possess a firearm in response to a
             special interrogatory to which all parties and the trial court had
             agreed?