Court Opinion

ID: 3359766
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:03:52.629223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:03.546085
License: Public Domain

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ARTICULATION
The defendant has made a Motion for Articulation and a Motion for Reargument, both dated December 24, 1997.
By way of articulation, the court finds that genuine issues of fact exist as to the allegations of negligence set forth in paragraph 9a-d of the First Count of the plaintiffs Amended Complaint dated June 11, 1997.
The Motion for Reargument is denied.
ROBERT F. STENGEL JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT