Court Opinion

ID: 732157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 16:38:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:49:52.747610
License: Public Domain

103 F.3d 143
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert M. STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-35645.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 2, 1996.*Decided Dec. 5, 1996.

Before:  SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Robert M. Stephens appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the United States in the government's action alleging trespass on federal lands.  Stephens contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for the government because he holds equitable title to the land to which his houseboat is moored through adverse possession.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.  We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed April 28, 1995.

3
We have considered Stephens's remaining contentions and find them to be meritless.

4
AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3