Court Opinion

ID: 4911228
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-15 18:01:18.327004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:29.806444
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40165     Document: 00516014666          Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/15/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                    September 15, 2021
                                   No. 21-40165                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Franklin Alexander Jimenez-Ramirez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 2:20-CR-990-1

   Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Franklin Alex-
   ander Jimenez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez-Ramirez has not filed
   a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40165    Document: 00516014666          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/15/2021

                                  No. 21-40165

   the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2