Court Opinion

ID: 9833753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:59:51.133822+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:06.442359
License: Public Domain

KEY, C. J.
The Phillip Carey Company, a foreign corporation, brought this suit in the county court of Williamson county against Thorndale Mercantile Company, doing business in Milam county, and against S. F. Evens and L. M. Lee, both residents of Williamson county. In its original petition the plaintiff alleged that the Thorndale Mercantile Company entered into a contract with Evens & Lee, by which the latter were to construct for the former a certain building at Thorndale in Milam county; that Evens & Lee constructed the building, and the Thorndale Mercantile Company paid them the amount owing therefor except $233; that Evens & Lee, by a written instrument, had transferred and assigned to the plaintiff said unpaid portion of the consideration for the construction of said building, and the suit was brought to recover the sum of $233, the amount thereof. The petition referred to did not allege any facts showing liability against Evens & Lee, but prayed that all the defendants be cited, and that upon final trial the plaintiff “have judgment for its damages, for costs of suit, and for general relief.” In due time and order the defendant Thorndale Mercantile Company filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, asserting its privilege to be sued in Milam county. The plea was in due form, and charged that the plaintiff had made Evens & Lee parties for the fraudulent purpose of conferring jurisdiction upon the court in the plaintiff's suit against the Thorndale Mercantile Company. After that plea was filed, the plaintiff filed an amended original petition, in which it alleged that Evens & Lee represented and guaranteed to the plaintiff that the Thorndale Mercantile Company was indebted to the firm of Evens & Lee in the sum of $233, and in that petition the plaintiff sought to recover from Evens & Lee if it was not entitled to recover against the Thorndale Mercantile Company. Upon the hearing as to the plea of privilege, the following testimony was submitted:
“It was agreed and admitted by all parties in open court that defendant Thorndale Mercantile Company was a corporation, incorporated under the laws of Texas, with its principal office and place of business at Thorndale, in precinct No. 8, of Milam county, Tex., where it has had and maintained its only place of business during all of its existence, and that at no time has it ever had or maintained an agent, office, or place of business in Williamson county, Tex. And it was further agreed and stated in open court by all parties that the said Thorndale Mercantile Company had not contracted in writing to perform the obligation sued on nor to pay the money sued for in any par-tieulai’ county, and that none of the exceptions of venue mentioned in article 1194. 1195, and 1585 existed in this case, except subdivision 4 of article 1194 of the revised statutes of 1897, if it applies.
“The defendant Thorndale Mercantile Company next offered in evidence a witness, S. F. Evens, who testified as follows: T am S. F. Evens, one of the defendants in this case, and am a member of the firm of Evens & Lee, who made the contract herein sued on with Thorndale Mercantile Company, and with the Phillip Carey Company, for the roofing. My partner, Mr. Lee, and myself both reside at Taylor, in Williamson county, Tex., where we both have resided before, at the time of, and ever since the institution Of this suit. I made the contract with said Thorndale Mercantile Company to build said building, and made the contract with the Phillip Carey Company, plaintiff, to put the roofing on same after the building was completed. The balance due by Thorndale Mercantile Company under said building contract to my firm was $233, and we owed the Phillip Carey Company a balance of $185, less some freight of about $18 that we had paid for them. Acting for the firm of Evens & Lee, we finally transferred to plaintiff the claim against Thorndale Mercantile Company of $233, and gave them a written transfer of same.’ Here the witness identified the said assignment, which was as follows: ‘The *1055state of Texas, County of Williamson. Know all men by these presents: That we, Evens & Lee, a copartnership, composed of S. F. Evens and L. M. Lee, for value received, do hereby transfer, assign and set over to the Phillip Carey Company, the sum of two hundred and thirty-three and no/100 dollars, being the balance due us from the Thorndale Mercantile Company, a private corporation, duly incorporated and having its principal place of business at Thorndale, Texas, for the construction of a certain building by us for the said Thorndale Mercantile Company, under written contract of date January 10, 1910. And this is to authorize and direct the said Thorndale Mercantile Company to pay to the said Phillip Carey Company the said sum of $233. Witness our hands this the 15th day of December, A. D. 1910. Evens & Lee, By S. F. Evens, A member of said firm.’ And which assignment was offered in evidence by the plaintiff. ‘We did not owe the plaintiff all of the $233, but in order to get rid of the matter, and settle the Phillip Carey Company claim of $185 against us, and to avoid having to bring suit ourselves, we transferred the entire claim of $233 to the Phillip Carey Company, in full settlement of their claim against us. It was my understanding, also, that one of the purposes of this transfer was to enable the Phillip Carey Company to bring this suit against the Thorndale Mercantile Company and Evens & Lee in Williamson county. After we made this transfer, the plaintiff filed suit against the Thorndale Mercantile Company and the firm of Evens & Lee, and my firm of Evens & Lee waived citation and made their appearance in court in this cause.’ The witness next identified the contracts between Evens & Lee and Thorndale Mercantile Company and between Evens & Lee and plaintiff, which are hereinafter copied and marked ‘Contract A’ and ‘Contract B,’ respectively, and which contracts were offered in evidence by defendant Thorndale Mercantile Company, which contracts are copied in full on pages 5 to 12, inclusive, hereof, and are referred to and made a part hereof. ‘We transferred this claim to plaintiff. H i told plaintiff that Thorndale Mercantile Company owed us a balance of $233 on our contract for constructing the building, and we transferred to them this amount in settlement of their claim against us. We represented to plaintiff that the balance due under the contract was $233, but we did not guarantee same, and did not put any guaranty into the written assignment that the $233, or any part of it, would be paid. We merely assigned this claim to plaintiff in settlement of their claim against us, and to enable them to bring suit in Williamson county against the Thorndale Mercantile Company and my firm. And Phillip Carey Company, plaintiff, accepted this assignment in full settlement of their claim against Evens & Lee.’ The witness further stated that Thorn-dale Mercantile Company had not promised or agreed to pay any amount at any certain place, and that the building mentioned in the contract and constructed for Thorndale Mercantile Company was located in Milam county, Tex., and that all of the work was done in that county. Witness further stated that Evens & Lee had made the contract with plaintiff to put the roof on the building, but that the contract with Thorndale Mercantile Company made by Evens & Lee called for ‘Carey’ roofing to be laid by the plaintiff, and that acting under the terms of this contract Evens & Lee arranged and contracted with plaintiff for the material and laying of said roof on said building.”
After hearing the foregoing, the trial court overruled the plea of privilege, and the case was then tried upon its merits, and a verdict and judgment rendered for the plaintiff against the Thorndale Mercantile Company, and that the plaintiff take nothing as against Evens & Lee, and the Thorndale Mercantile Company has appealed.
[1] The first assignment complains of the action of the trial court in overruling and not sustaining the defendant’s plea of privilege to be sued in Milam county, and we sustain that assignment. The clear and undisputed testimony shows that Evens & Lee did not guarantee the payment of the cause of action which they assigned to the plaintiff, and that they were in no wise and upon no contingency liable. According to the evidence of Evens, the only witness who testified concerning the matter, there was no guaranty, misrepresentation, or concealment by Evens & Lee; and, as a result of the transaction between them and the plaintiff, the latter paid them about $185 for their claim of $233 against the Thorndale Mercantile Company. Upon that state of facts, no pretext or excuse could exist for making them parties to the suit; and therefore it must be held that they were made parties defendant for the sole purpose of litigating the plaintiff's claim against the Thorndale Mercantile Company in Williamson county, and such purpose was in law a fraud upon the jurisdiction of the trial court and a violation of the Thorndale Mercantile Company’s right to be sued in Milam county.
In view of our conclusion upon the question just disposed if, we deem it improper to consider the other questions presented in appellant’s brief.
Un account of the error referred to, the judgment is reversed, with instructions to the court below to sustain the plea of privilege and transfer the case to the county court of Milam county.
Reversed, with instructions.