Court Opinion

ID: 8268979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:19:28.323626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:27.574147
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
So far as concerns the commissions allowed the trustee upon the income of the estate, which were at the rate of five per cent., we think the circumstances of this case are sufficient to warrant the allowance of that amount, particularly in view of the fact that Mrs. Acer and her husband, who was a lawyer, both permitted the deduction of commissions at that rate without objection, and that a very large proportion of the estate was invested in the stock of a manufacturing corporation subject to the hazards of business and necessarily involving some risk to the trustee. In approving this allowance, however, we *294are not to be understood as approving the custom, if it be a custom, as suggested, of allowing a trustee five per cent, on the income in all cases. It is quite evident that a different test of the propriety of the allowance is prescribed by section 130 of the Orphans Court act. P. L. 1898 p. 762. The act authorizes the allowance of such commission upon the interest or income as the court shall deem fair and just, considering the actual pains, trouble and risk of the accountant. It then provides that the allowance shall not exceed five per cent.-—a sufiL eiently plain intimation that it may well be less. Eo doubt in the case of estates where the income is small, five per cent, may be properly allowed in order to give the trustee compensation sufficient to induce proper men to assume the responsibility, but in a case like this, where the annual income is large, it must require unusual circumstances to justify the allowance of the full rate of commission, and we are not to be understood as holding that, even in this case, so large an allowance would be proper in the future.
As to the allowance of a commission upon the corpus of the estate, we think that the trustee has administered the trust for so short a time, and has had so little to do with making or changing investments, that no commission on the corpus ought to have been allowed. The cestui que trust is of such an age that it may fairly be expected that the trust will continue for thirty or forty years longer, and if the present commission were allowed to a trustee who has served some seven years only, and has practically done nothing but receive and disburse the income of investments already made, it might result in leaving too small a fund available for the payment of future commissions.
We think the decree should be reversed and the record remitted, in order that a decree may be entered disallowing the commission on the corpus.
For affirmance—Yoori-iees, Yroom—2.
For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Gray, Congdon—12.