Court Opinion

ID: 8279756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 03:45:00.866157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:40.258199
License: Public Domain

SEABURY, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover a balance of $323 upon a check alleged to have been given to him by the defendant. The answer denied the allegation of the complaint, and pleaded that the check was without consideration. Upon the trial it was stated by counsel, but not proved, that the check was lost.' The defendant admitted making and delivering a check for $423 to the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that $100 had been paid on account of this check. The defendant denied that she made this payment and testified that it was made by her husband, to whom she claimed the plaintiff sold the goods for which the check was given.
The judgment rendered cannot be sustained upon the evidence disclosed by the record. There is no proof that the check was lost, nor that it was drawn upon a bank or banker, nor of its date, nor as to how it was signed. The plaintiff also failed to prove that at the time he was the owner of the check. The court below accepted the statement of counsel for the plaintiff that the check was lost in lieu of proof, and gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff, without requiring the plaintiff to furnish a bond, as required by section 1917 of the Code of Civil Procedure. To recover upon the theory that the check was lost, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove its loss, and to prove its contents, so as at least to identify it as the check set forth in the complaint, and to prove that he was the owner of the check at the time of the trial.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.