Court Opinion

ID: 6252282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:19:01.221493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:27.167828
License: Public Domain

.Pee CUBlAMj
The decree appealed from was made in the exercise of the chancery powers of the court. It does not deprive the appellant of his right to have his execution satisfied out of the proceeds of the sale of the personal property of the Majestic Apartment House Company if he has such right. The bond given by the Fidelity Title and Trust Company insures the payment for said property of a sum largely in excess of what will be required to pay the appellant if he has the preference which he *589claims. Whether he has such preference can be determined by the court after due consideration upon final hearing or on distribution of the proceeds of sale made by the receiver. We have not been persuaded that we should depart from the rule as to non-interference with preliminary injunctions, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to any rights of the appellant, the costs to be disposed of on final hearing.