Court Opinion

ID: 1003124
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:21:38.933469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:38.472788
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-7143

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSEPH CRUM, a/k/a Unique,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94-
384-L, CA-97-2108-L)

Submitted:   November 30, 2000          Decided:    December 12, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Crum, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joseph Crum seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).     We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Crum, Nos. CR-94-384-L; CA-97-2108-L

(D. Md. Aug. 17, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2