Court Opinion

ID: 8432313
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 08:16:33.17236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:38.615574
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Gussie Minus appeals the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge recommending summary judgment in favor of DAK Americas in Minus’ employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation from which Minus appeals does not constitute an order over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED