Court Opinion

ID: 4026259
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-18 15:01:18.353229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:07.818576
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 15-3617
                         ___________________________

                          Carmen Elizabeth Rivas-Alvarez

                              lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                            v.

              Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States

                             lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                            Submitted: August 15, 2016
                              Filed: August 18, 2016
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Salvadoran citizen Carmen Elizabeth Rivas-Alvarez petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s denial
of petitioner’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. After careful
consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports
the agency’s decision, see Quinonez-Perez v. Holder, 635 F.3d 342, 344 (8th Cir.
2011), because petitioner failed to establish that the claimed past persecution, or the
claimed fear of future persecution, was on account of a protected asylum ground, see
DeCastro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 380-81 (8th Cir. 2013); Matul-
Hernandez v. Holder, 685 F.3d 707, 712-13 (8th Cir. 2012); Constanza v. Holder, 647
F.3d 749, 753-54 (8th Cir. 2011).

      The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________

                                         -2-