Court Opinion

ID: 9868153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 18:00:43.987199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:40.389194
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10321        Document: 00516908092             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/26/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 23-10321
                                    Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                    ____________                             September 26, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Kinnsley Charlieann Mathews,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:22-CR-84-2
                     ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kinnsley
   Charlieann Mathews has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mathews has not filed a response. We
   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10321     Document: 00516908092         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/26/2023

                                  No. 23-10321

   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2