Court Opinion

ID: 2885086
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 18:08:32.66916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:20.275795
License: Public Domain

CANAL INVESTMENT ET AL V. RENEAU ET AL

NO. 07-00-0052-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JUNE 13, 2000

CANAL INVESTMENT SOCIETY, CWF ENTERPRISES, INC., FAISON & ASSOCIATES, INC., HENRY J. FAISON, ROBERT W. LIPTAK, LUTHER H. HODGES, JR., AND HAROLD C. STOWE,

Appellant

V.

JAMES RENEAU, RENEAU OIL COMPANY, RENEAU SEED COMPANY, ESTACADO ENERGY, INC., QUESTA ENERGY CORPORATION, STAHL PETROLEUM COMPANY, J. B. PETROLEUM, PAUL MACINA, PETROLEUM MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., D. LYMAN STUBBLEFIELD, AND MORGAS, 

Appellee

FROM THE 31
ST
 DISTRICT COURT OF WHEELER COUNTY;

NO. 10610; HON. STEVEN R. EMMERT, PRESIDING

ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Before this Court is appellants’ Motion for Dismissal of Appeal requesting dismissal of this appeal because “a full and final settlement of this litigation has been reached.”  The  certificate of conference on appellants’ motion indicates that appellees have no objection to the appeal being dismissed.

We, therefore, grant appellants’ motion and dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(2).  Having dismissed the appeal at the request of appellants, no motions for rehearing will be entertained by the Court and our mandate shall issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.