Court Opinion

ID: 8971865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 10:35:20.10961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:10:26.863711
License: Public Domain

Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 1013; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 955];
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 974; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 955];
Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 975; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 957];
Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U. S. 975; restored to calendar, 395 U. S. 957];
Appeal from D. C. Conn. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 395 U. S. 974];
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 395 U. S. 974];
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Tex. [Probable jurisdiction noted sub nom. Batchelor v. Stein, 396 U. S. 954]; and
Appeal from D. C. Mass. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 985.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument.