Court Opinion

ID: 8601123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 22:28:02.824634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:10.916956
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2006); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to petitioners Agustin Victorino Montes Medina, Agency No. A95-191-263 and Martha Elisa Torres Sanchez, Agency No. A95-191-264.
In addition, with respect to petitioners, Victor Aonso Montes Torres, Agency No. A95-191-265, and Ricardo Omar Montes Torres, Agency No. A95-191-266, the court summarily denies the petition for review because these petitioners lack a qualifying relative under the statute and are therefore ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D) (requiring alien to show that “removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to the alien’s spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir.2002) (denying cancellation of removal where alien lacked a qualifying relative under the statute); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.