Court Opinion

ID: 3670894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:19:22.156155+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:08.189501
License: Public Domain

This is an action on a note payable to the order of the plaintiff, and executed by the defendant, J. M. Templeton, Jr., as maker, and the defendant, A. J. Templeton, as endorser.
From judgment overruling his demurrer to the complaint, the defendant, A. J. Templeton, appealed to the Supreme Court.
It appears from the complaint that the note sued on was dated 2 April, 1929, and was due ninety days after its date. This action was begun on 16 March, 1931. *Page 785 
The demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it is not alleged therein that notice in writing was given to the defendant of the dishonor of the note by its nonpayment at maturity, was properly overruled. Sufficient facts are alleged in the amended complaint to show that there was a waiver of notice by the defendant both express and implied, if upon all the facts alleged in the complaint defendant was liable only as an endorser, and, therefore, entitled to notice. C. S., 3091.
Affirmed.