Court Opinion

ID: 4122485
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-01 21:13:18.088601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:49.370734
License: Public Domain

ORDER
 

  PER CURIAM
 

  AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
 

  Whether the Trial Court and Superior Court erred in sustaining [Respondent’s] demurrer to all Mounts of [Petitioner’s] Complaint, where, even assuming
  
   ar-guendo
  
  that the Compensation Plan was in violation of R.P.C. 5.4, Pennsylvania law, public policy and the interests of justice require such an agreement to be enforced because an attorney must not be shielded from liability, nor financially rewarded for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct[?]
 

  Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.