Court Opinion

ID: 8450937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:17:11.145015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.513823
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Randall Brawner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:12-cv-01889-RMG-KDW, 2012 WL 6737191 (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.