Court Opinion

ID: 9392072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-04 00:00:29.529093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:15.762428
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50741        Document: 00516737408             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/03/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 22-50741
                                    Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                    ____________                                     May 3, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Keith Evans,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Western District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:14-CR-292-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Keith Evans has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Evans has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Evans’s

          _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50741    Document: 00516737408          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/03/2023

                                  No. 22-50741

   response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                           2