Court Opinion

ID: 9638678
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 15:50:19.443663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:08.763161
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
On motion for rehearing, Brokers asserts that we should have remanded its original action against Standard for the balance due under the lease agreement for trial on the merits. We agree. Although Brokers attacked only the trial judge’s finding of usury in its original brief and presented no point with respect to the trial judge’s refusal to grant relief on its action against Standard, it did pray for a remand for trial on *282its action against Standard. Since Brokers has now on rehearing presented this question by point of error, we remand Brokers’ claim on the lease against Standard. Tex.R.Civ.P. 434. In all other respects, the motions for rehearing are overruled.
Reversed and remanded in part and rendered in part.