Court Opinion

ID: 2923462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:31:06.228306+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:16.694464
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-05-720-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 
___________________________________________________________________
 
ELTON ADAMCEK, ET AL.,                                       Appellants,
 
                                           v.
 
REYNOLDS
METALS CO., ET AL.,                              Appellees.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                  On appeal from the 23rd  District Court
                           of Wharton
County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
      Before Chief Justice Valdez and
Justices Hinojosa and Garza
Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 

Appellants, ELTON ADAMCEK, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a
purported order entered by the 23rd District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 37,761.  After the notice of appeal was received,
appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. 
In the motion, appellees state that the matter which appellants are
attempting to appeal is not an order, is clearly not a final judgment and is
not appealable as a matter of law. 
Appellees request that this Court dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.  
The Court, having
considered the documents on file, appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal, and appellants= response thereto, is
of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellees= motion to dismiss is
granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 16th day of March,
2006.