Court Opinion

ID: 9526717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:22:32.801549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:21:12.557096
License: Public Domain

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice,
on petition for rehearing.
[¶ 44] The YMCA filed a petition for rehearing, arguing that we erred in concluding whether the waiver was ambiguous. The YMCA also calls the Court’s attention to an error in the opinion. The Court did err at ¶ 3 of the opinion when it stated, “[t]he YMCA concedes in its brief that the number of children exceeded the state and county’s child-to-adult ratio requirements.” Hillerson v. Bismarck Pub. Sch., 2013 ND 193, ¶ 3. Conversely, in its brief, the YMCA stated, “[o]n June 13, 2008, 42 participants in the ESP program, including T.D., went to the Mandan Community Center to swim. The group was accompanied by seven ESP staff members, which exceeded child-to-adult ratio requirements.” The Court was mistaken; however, the error had no substantive impact on this stage of the proceedings. The *79petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that we correct the misstatement in the original opinion at ¶ 3. In all other respects the petition for rehearing is denied.
[¶ 45] DALE V. SANDSTROM, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, MARY MUEHLEN MARING and DANIEL J. GROTHERS, JJ., concur.