Court Opinion

ID: 2964227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:22:27.897163+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:07.398674
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          July 23, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1265

                                  ANTHONY KACHIKWU,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                             CHARLES T. GRIGSBY, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ___________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                  [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
                                                ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Anthony Kachikwu on brief pro se.
            ________________
            Merita  A.  Hopkins,  Corporation  Counsel,  and  Dawna  McIntyre,
            ___________________                               _______________
        Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of Boston Law Department, on brief
        for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  Upon careful review  of the record and
                      __________

            the parties'  briefs, we  conclude that summary  judgment for

            the  defendant  was proper  for  the  reasons stated  by  the

            district court.  We add only the following comments.

                      Defendant's  discovery responses do  not suggest to

            us any grounds for reversing the judgment here.

                      We cannot consider the  judgment entered in another

            action against other defendants, as that matter is not before

            us now.

                      We know  of no  basis for plaintiff's  request that

            this case be transferred to state court. 

                      Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                      ________   ___

                                         -2-