Court Opinion

ID: 8864029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 17:58:46.978767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:56.046947
License: Public Domain

WHEELER, District Judge.
Section 7 of the administrative act (26 Stat. 134) provided that the importer may “make such addition in the entry "to the cost or value given in the invoice, or pro forma invoice, or statement in form of an invoice, which he shall produce with Ms entry as, in his opinion, may raise the same to the actual market value”; that all additional duties, penalties, or forfeitures applicable to merchandise entered by a duly-certined invoice shall be alike applicable to goods entered by a pro forma invoice, or statement in form of an invoice, and that the duty should not “be assessed upon an amount less than the invoice or entered value.” These importers made such an addition upon the invoice produced- with the entry, which was disregarded, and a penal duty assessed that would not have accrued if it had been regarded. The board sustained the protest. The invoice seems to be the foundation of information of value; and this does not seem to be confined to the original consular invoice, for the provisions extend to pro forma invoices and statements. This statement of addition was upon the invoice when it was produced with the entry, and so was a part of the invoice value, to which, by the statute, all additional duties, penalties, or forfeitures were alike applicable, and below which, as distinguished from entered value, the collector could not go. It was to be regarded upward as well as downward, in liquidating the entry, and was an addition to make market value “in the entry” as a whole, alihough not written into the paper technically called the “entry.” Decision in 1,973 affirmed, in 1,979 reversed.