Court Opinion

ID: 1000505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:41:43.239116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:15.768945
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7162

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MILTON EARL FAIRCLOTH,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-94-300, CA-98-1044-1)

Submitted:   December 16, 1999         Decided:     December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton Earl Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Lawrence Patrick Auld, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Milton Earl Faircloth seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Faircloth, Nos. CR-94-300; CA-

98-1044-1 (M.D.N.C. July 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2