Court Opinion

ID: 9698565
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:54:13.662445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:41.949324
License: Public Domain

PASHMAN, J.,
concurring and dissenting in part.
For the reasons I have stated previously in State v. Carpen-tieri, 82 N.J. 546, 556 (1980) (Pashman, J., dissenting), and State v. Howery, 80 N.J. 563, 575 (Pashman, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 994, 100 S.Ct. 527, 62 L.Ed.2d 424 (1979), I believe that the minimization standards established today in this case should be applied retroactively to cases pending direct review in our courts. I agree with the majority, however, that *449these standards were not violated by the police conduct in this case. Accordingly, I vote with the majority to affirm the convictions of these defendants.
PASHMAN, J., concurring in the result.
For affirmance —Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, and POLLOCK — 7.
For reversal —None.