Court Opinion

ID: 5774909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:39:12.478642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:51.773718
License: Public Domain

Order entered February 6, 1970 unanimously reversed on the facts and the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and preference denied. Appeal from order entered March 2, 1970 dismissed as academic without costs and without disbursements. A trial preference was granted to plaintiff following a pretrial hearing on the ground that defendant failed to seek in good faith to adjust the case. We have repeatedly held that a preference can be granted only on a record made at the hearing which demonstrates the defendant’s intransigence {Wolff v. Láveme, Inc., 17 A D 2d 213). The recitals in the order do not constitute such a record. Moreover, even these do not indicate a failure to co-operate. Concur — Eager, J. P., Markewich, McNally and Steuer, JJ.