Court Opinion

ID: 9564873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 19:10:27.930133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:12.501271
License: Public Domain

Hill, Justice,
dissenting.
I agree with the trial judge who found as follows:
"This case involves the circumstance of one taking advantage of his position of public trust for his personal advantage which would not have been available to any non-Board member medical practitioner, giving him an 'inside’ advantage which is abhorrent to anyone’s sense of fair play or ethics.”
"In this situation, a court of equity, which is a court of good conscience, should intervene to protect defendants against unconscionable acts for which there is otherwise no redress.”
Code Ann. § 55-101 supports the trial judge’s decision and I would affirm.