Court Opinion

ID: 4127654
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:31:53.435011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:36.688378
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                            GREG        ABBOTT

                                                 August 8, 2014

The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D.                         Opinion No. GA-1074
Chair, Committee on Economic Development
Texas State Senate                                           Re: Whether Texas Triple Chance, a game
Post Office Box 12068                                        proposed by the Lottery Commission, violates
Austin, Texas 78711-2068                                     the Texas Constitution (RQ-1185-GA)

Dear Senator Deuell:

        You ask whether a new game, Texas Triple Chance, created by the Texas Lottery
Commission (the "Commission") violates the Texas Constitution. 1 Article III, subsection 47(e)
of the Texas Constitution provides that "[t]he Legislature by general law may authorize the State
to operate lotteries." TEX. CONST. art. III, § 47(e). Pursuant to this authority, the Legislature has
enacted chapter 466 of the Government Code, titled the State Lottery Act ("the Act"). TEX.
Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.001 (West 2012); see generally id. §§ 466.002-.453 (West 2012 &
Supp. 2013). Under section 466.015 ofthe Act, the Commission "may adopt rules governing the
establishment and operation of the lottery, including rules governing ... the type of lottery
games to be conducted." !d.§ 466.015(c)(1) (West 2012).

        Pursuant to its rulemaking authority, the Commission has adopted a new administrative
rule explaining the game design, operation, and prize structure for Texas Triple Chance. See 16
TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 401.322 (West 2014) (Tex. Lottery Comm'n). For each $2 play, "the
player gets three sets of7 numbers, or three Chances to win." !d. § 401.322(d), (e)(2). Each set
is selected from a field of 55 (numbered 1-55)." !d. § 401.322(d). Drawings for Texas Triple
Chance will be held daily, Monday through Saturday, at which time "[t]en (10) different
numbers from 1 through 55 shall be drawn." !d.§ 401.322(£)(1)-(2). "If the player matches all
7 numbers in any one chance to the numbers drawn in the drawing, the player wins the top prize"
of $100,000, subject to certain exceptions. 2 !d. § 401.322(d), (h)(l)(A). If a player matches 6
numbers in any one chance to the numbers drawn in the drawing, the player wins $500, and

         'Letter from Senator Robert F. Deuel!, M.D., Chair, Comm. on Econ. Dev., to Honorable Greg Abbott,
Tex. Att'y Gen. (Feb. 10, 2014), http://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").
         2
          "[I]n any drawing where the number of top prize-winning Chances is greater than ten (I 0), the top prize
shall be paid on a pari-mutuel rather than fixed prize basis and a liability cap of $1 million will be divided equally
by the number of top prize-winning Chances." 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE§ 401.322(h)(l)(A) (West 2014).
The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 2               (GA-1074)

smaller prizes exist for a match of 5, 4 or 3 numbers. ld. § 401.322(h)(l)(A) (table). In
describing Texas Triple Chance, you state that the game "contains a preset prize amount" and
that "[i]n the event there is not a jackpot winner, the Texas Lottery will retain the jackpot prize
money." Request Letter at 1. Based on these aspects of the game, you question whether it
"qualifies as a 'lottery' under the guidelines set by the Texas Constitution." Id.

         In reviewing the constitutionality of an administrative rule, courts begin with the
presumption that the rule is constitutional. See Tex. Liquor Control Bd. v. Attic Club, Inc., 457
S.W.2d 41, 45 (Tex. 1970) (explaining that statutes are presumed constitutional and that agency
rules should be reviewed under the same principles as statutes). The Texas Constitution does not
define the term "lottery," but the term is defined in the Act to mean "the procedures operated by
the state under [chapter 466 of the Government Code] through which prizes are awarded or
distributed by chance among persons who have paid, or unconditionally agreed to pay, for a
chance or other opportunity to receive a prize." TEX. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.002(5) (West
2012). This legislative definition of lottery is in accord with the Texas Supreme Court's
articulation of the three elements necessary to constitute a lottery: "[1] the offering of a prize, [2]
the award of the prize by chance, and [3] the giving of a consideration for an opportunity to win
the prize." City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co., 100 S.W.2d 695, 701 (Tex. 1936). We will
therefore analyze the Texas Triple Chance game in light of these elements. The Commission
offers prizes for the game in the. amount of $100,000, $500, $25, $5 or $2, depending on the
number of correct number matches in a given play. 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 401.322(h)(l)(A)
(West 2014) (table). The award of the prize is contingent on matching a set of numbers to those
drawn, which is decided by chance. Id. Each play requires $2 in consideration for an
opportunity to win a prize. Id. § 401.322(e)(2). The Texas Triple Chance game therefore
satisfies the three elements required to qualify as a lottery under Texas law.

        The Commission is charged with administering the provisions of the State Lottery Act.
TEX. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.015(a) (West 2012). The Legislature has given the Commission
broad discretion to adopt rules governing the establishment and operation of the lottery so long
as such rules do not conflict with state or federal law. Id. § 466.015(c). With regard to your
stated concerns about the game, we find nothing in the Texas Constitution or the Act that
prohibits the Commission from offering a preset prize amount regardless of the number of tickets
purchased. Nor does the Texas Constitution or the Act require the Commission to carry forward
any unpaid prize money to be awarded to an ev(mtual winner. 3 If room for policy determinations
exists in a statute, courts normally defer to the agency's interpretation unless it is plainly
erroneous or inconsistent with the statute, regulation, or rule. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co. v.
Combs, 340 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Tex. 2011). The lack oflegislative directive on how lottery prizes
are to be awarded suggests that the Legislature has given the Commission discretion to make

        3
           Multiple games currently offered through the Commission also involve preset prize amounts with the
possibility of no jackpot winner. See, e.g., id. §§ 401.307 ('"Pick 3' On-Line Game Rule"), .316 ("'Daily 4' On-
Line Game Rule"), .320 ('"All or Nothing' On-Line Game Rule").
The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 3 (GA-1074)

those policy determinations. Thus, a court is unlikely to conclude that the Commission's Texas
Triple Chance game is unconstitutional merely because it awards a preset prize amount
regardless of the number of tickets purchased or because it does not carry forward any unpaid
prize money to be awarded to an eventual winner.
The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 4      (GA-1074)

                                    SUMMARY

                     A court is unlikely to conclude that the Texas Lottery
              Commission's Texas Triple Chance game is unconstitutional
              merely because it awards a preset prize amount regardless of the
              number of tickets purchased or because it does not carry forward
              any unpaid prize money to be awarded to an eventual winner.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            Attorney General ofTexas

DANIEL T. HODGE
First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES D. BLACKLOCK
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee

Virginia K. Hoelscher
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee