Court Opinion

ID: 2860790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 20:55:51.504182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:49.171973
License: Public Domain

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">5</A>-00<A NAME="2">591</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>

<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Starlight, L.P.</A>, Appellant</CENTER>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="4">Loren Baxter and Xarin Austin I Limited</A>, Appellees</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">TRAVIS</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">200TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">94-01269</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">JOHN K. DIETZ</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING </STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>

<STRONG>PER CURIAM</STRONG>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	The parties have filed a joint agreed motion to dismiss.  This proceeding involved an
interlocutory appeal from the trial-court's refusal to modify a temporary injunction.  The parties have
proceeded to a trial on the merits, rendering any interlocutory appeals moot.  We note that the parties filed
both an appeal and a mandamus concerning the same order.  This Court assigned two cause numbers:  the
appeal is cause 95-591, the mandamus cause 95-615.  The parties have filed this motion in cause 95-591
but refer to a mandamus.  Because the trial on the merits moots both, we assume it was intended to apply
to both cause numbers.</P>

<P>	Accordingly, we grant the parties' motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal.</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Appeal Dismissed on Joint Motion</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Filed:    June 26, 1997</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>