Court Opinion

ID: 9942367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-20 21:10:50.622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:59.842253
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Patterson, 2024-Ohio-633.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                            ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 TRUMBULL COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                     CASE NO. 2024-T-0011

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                   Criminal Appeal from the
        - vs -                                     Court of Common Pleas

LUKE D. PATTERSON,
                                                   Trial Court No. 2001 CR 00001
                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                         MEMORANDUM
                                           OPINION

                                      Decided: February 20, 2024
                                     Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, and Ryan J. Sanders, Assistant
Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH
44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Luke D. Patterson, pro se, Reg. No. 60459-060, FCI Gilmer Federal Correctional
Institution, 201 FCI Lane, P.O. Box 6000, Glenville, WV 26351 (Defendant-Appellant).

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.

        {¶1}     Appellant, Luke D. Patterson, pro se, filed a notice of appeal on January 19,

2024, from the trial court’s August 18, 2023 entry denying his “Writ of Error Coram Nobis.”

A timely appeal from the August entry was due no later than September 18, 2023, which

was not a holiday or weekend. Thus, the appeal is untimely filed by approximately 4

months.

        {¶2}     Appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on January

22, 2024. No brief or memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed.
Appellee asserts that the appeal should be dismissed because 1) appellant failed to

comply with Loc.R. 3(D)(3), which is now Loc.R. 3(C)(2), by attaching the appealed entry

to his notice of appeal; and 2) the appeal is untimely filed.

       {¶3}   App.R. 4(A)(1) states in relevant part:

       {¶4}   “[A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”

       {¶5}   App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part:

       {¶6}   “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

       {¶7}   “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *

       {¶8}   “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right.”

       {¶9}   Here, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in

App.R. 4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without

jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

       {¶10} Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby dismissed as being untimely.

       {¶11} Appeal dismissed.

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.

                                              2

Case No. 2024-T-0011