Court Opinion

ID: 9961696
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-19 16:00:50.41423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:21.766965
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-3711
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                              Nyakuoth Duop Mach

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: March 15, 2024
                              Filed: April 19, 2024
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Nyakuoth Mach appeals following the district court’s revocation of her
probation. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the revocation sentence is
substantively unreasonable.
        Upon careful review, we vacate the revocation sentence, and remand the matter
for resentencing, as the record does not indicate that the district court considered
Chapter 7 of the Sentencing Guidelines in imposing the sentence. See United States
v. Michael, 909 F.3d 990, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (upon revoking
probation, court is required to consider Chapter 7 of Sentencing Guidelines in
determining appropriate sentence). While we express no opinion as to the
reasonableness of imposing a sentence within the Guidelines range calculated at the
initial sentencing, on remand, the district court is directed to also consider Chapter
7. See USSG § 7B1.4(a) (revocation imprisonment table). Counsel’s motion to
withdraw is denied.
                        ______________________________

                                         -2-