Court Opinion

ID: 4124997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-10 02:12:09.796148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:34.740106
License: Public Domain

KEN PAXTON
                                         ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

                                              February 16, 2016

The Honorable Natalie C. Koehler                          Opinion No. KP-0067
Bosque County Attorney
Post Office Box 215                                       Re: County responsibilities regarding interstate
Meridian, Texas 76665                                     extradition (RQ-0050-KP)

Dear Ms. Koehler:

        You ask which entity, as between a city police department and a county sheriffs office,
"bear[s] responsibility for extradition across state lines" in connection with the transportation: of a
person located outside the State back to Texas pursuant to an arrest warrant. 1 You also ask whether
the county, if it is determined to bear this responsibility, may "be reimbursed by the agency who
requested the warrant." Request Letter at 1. Based on the limited background information
provided, we confine our discussion to (1) the general duty created by an arrest warrant with
respect to a person arrested outside the State; and (2) the costs associated with interstate
extradition, and we express no opinion regarding the specific circumstances in your case. See
Request Letter at 1; Email at 1.

        The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 15.06 provides as follows:

                 A warrant of arrest, issued by any county or district clerk, or by any
                 magistrate ... shall extend to any part of the State; and any peace
                 officer to whom said warrant is directed, or into whose hands the
                 same has been transferred, shall be authorized to execute the same
                 in any county in this State.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 15.06. If a· person is arrested in a different county from the one in
which the warrant was issued and the person does not post bail as provided in article 15 .18 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, the sheriff, after receiving notice, is obligated to "go or send for the
arrested person and have the arrested person brought before the proper court or magistrate." Id.
art. 15.20; see also id. arts. 15.18 (procedural requirements for out-of-county arrests), 15.19
(notification to sheriff); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. L0-92-67, at 2 (construing article 15.20 to
obligate the sheriff to transport an arrested person back from a distant county even when the

          1
            Letter from Honorable Natalie C. Koehler, Bosque Cty. Att'y, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen.
 at I (Sept. 9, 2015), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs ("Request Letter"); see
 also Email from Honorable Natalie C. Koehler, Bosque Cty. Att'y, at I (Oct. 14, 2015) (on file with the Op. Comm.)
 ("Email").
The Honorable Natalie C. Koehler - Page 2         (KP-0067)

warrant is obtained by a city police department). The authority to execute an arrest warrant
pursuant to article 15.06, however, is applicable only "in this State." TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.
15.06; see generally Street v. Cherba, 662 F.2d 1037, 1039 (4th Cir. 1981) ("[g]enerally, an arrest
warrant issued in one state may not be lawfully executed in another"). Thus, an arrest warrant, by
itself, does not impose a duty on a sheriff or any other peace officer of this State to travel out of
state to take custody of the person named in the warrant. Instead, the duty, if any, to take custody
in another State is governed by state and federal extradition law.

        The interstate extradition of fugitives is controlled by the United States Constitution,
federal law, and state law. The Extradition Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides that

               [a] person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other
               Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State,
               shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which
               he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having
               Jurisdiction of the Crime.

U.S. CONST. art. IV, § 2, cl. 2. Congress has implemented this constitutional provision in federal
law, providing that

               [w]henever the executive authority of any State ... demands any
               person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority of any
               State . ." . to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an
               indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any
               State ... , charging the person demanded with having committed
               treason, felony, or other crime, certified as authentic by the governor
               or chief magistrate of the State . . . from whence the person so
               charged has fled, the executive authority of the State ... to which
               such person has fled shall cause him to be arrested and secured, and
               notify the executive authority making such demand, or the agent of
               such authority appointed to receive the fugitive, and shall cause the
               fugitive to be delivered to such agent when he shall appear. If no
               such agent appears within thirty days from the time of the arrest, the
               prisoner may be discharged.

18 U.S.C. § 3182. With respect to costs, Congress has provided that "[a]ll costs or expenses
incurred in any extradition proceeding in apprehending, securing, and transmitting a fugitive shall
be paid by the demanding authority." Id. § 3195.

        The State of Texas has further implemented the Extradition Clause through general
extradition provisions as well as through the adoption of the Uniform Criminal Extr~dition Act
("UCEA"), both located in chapter 51 (Fugitives from Justice) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
See generally TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. arts. 51.01-.14. Pursuant to chapter 51, the Governor may
make a demand for the return of a fugitive from another State and assign a person to transport the
individual back to Texas, who may then be compensated for his services. For example, under the
general provisions,
The Honorable Natalie C. Koehler - Page 3        (KP-0067)

               [w]hen the Governor deems it proper to demand a person who has
               committed an offense in this State and has fled to another State, he
               may commission any suitable person to take such requisition. The
               accused, if brought back to the State, shall be delivered up to the
               sheriff of the county in which it is alleged he has committed the
               offense.

Id. art. 51.09. The general provisions contemplate two alternate sources for compensation:

               Sec. 1. The officer or person so commissioned shall receive as
               compensation the actual and necessary traveling expenses upon
               requisition of the Governor to be allowed by such Governor and to
               be paid out of the State Treasury upon a certificate of the Governor
               reciting the services rendered and the allowance therefor.

               Sec. 2. The commissioners court of the county where an offense is
               committed may in its discretion, on the request of the sheriff and the
               recommendation of the district attorney, pay the actual and
               necessary traveling expenses of the officer or person so
               commissioned out of any fund or funds not otherwise pledged.

Id. art. 51.10; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. V-587 (1948) at 3-4 (construing identical
language from the predecessor to article 51.10 and explaining that payment under section 1 is "an
obligation of the State" butthat "should the State refuse ... then the Commissioners Court may in
its discretion pay ... in accordance with Section 2"); V-525 (1948) at 4 (construing the same and
noting that the discretion of the commissioners court to pay travel expenses is conditional on the
agent having been appointed by the Governor pursuant to statute). Similarly, under the UCEA:

               Whenever the Governor of this State shall demand a person charged
               with crime ... in this State, from the Executive Authority of any
               other State ... he shall issue a warrant under the state seal, to some
               agent, commanding him to receive the person so charged if
               delivered to him and convey him to the proper officer of the county
               in this State in which the offense was committed, or in which the
               prosecution for such offense is then pending.

               In all cases of extradition, the commissioners court of the county
               where an offense is alleged to have been committed, or in which the
               prosecution is then pending may in its discretion, on request of the
               sheriff and the recommendation of the prosecuting attorney, pay the
               actual and necessary expenses of the officer or person
               commissioned to receive the person charged, out of any county fund
               or funds not otherwise pledged.
The Honorable Natalie C. Koehler - Page 4          (KP-0067)

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 51.13 §§ 22, 24. Neither the general provisions nor the UCEA
provisions establish any particular eligibility requirements, other than, in the case of article 51.09,
that the person be "suitable," to be appointed as the Governor's agent to receive and return a
fugitive from another State. Id. art. 51.09.

        With regard to your specific question about the duty to transport an arrestee in this case,
you provide no further information regarding who was named as the Governor's agent or the
manner in which the extradition was carried out. Thus, we can advise only generally that the
person with the responsibility to transport an out-of-state arrestee back to the county in which the
offense was allegedly committed is the person so commissioned by the Governor in the extradition
requisition. With regard to the reimbursement of expenses, the designation of the Governor's
agent must necessarily precede a determination of who is responsible for reimbursement of that
agent's travel expenses. Thus, under the limited facts presented, we cannot advise about any
reimbursement of expenses beyond what is provided under articles 51.10 and 51.13, section 24, of
the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Honorable Natalie C. Koehler - Page 5       (KP-0067)

                                     SUMMARY

                      Pursuant to articles 51.09 and 51.13 of the Code of Criminal
              Procedure, a person commissioned by the Governor in an extradition
              requisition to receive and return an out-of-state arrestee back to the
              county in which an offense was allegedly committed has the duty to
              carry out that responsibility. The actual and necessary expenses of
              a person so commissioned may be paid pursuant to article 51.10 or
              article 51.13, section 24, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            ~?~
                                            KEN PAXTON
                                            Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY
First Assistant Attorney General

BRANTLEY STARR
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee

BECKY P. CASARES
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee