Court Opinion

ID: 9309685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:37:57.616008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:05.494496
License: Public Domain

GIFFEN, J.
The defendant, as lessee of the third floor of a building belonging to the plaintiff, constructed a partition across the same, for the purpose of subletting a part thereof, the upper part being of glass and the lower part being of wood fitting into the groove of a cleat which was nailed to the floor. At the edges and at the top it was wedged but not' otherwise fastened to the walls or the ceiling, and could easily be removed without doing any substantial injury to the building.
Held: The nature of the article affixed, the relation of landlord and tenant, the structure and mode of annexation, and the purpose or use for subletting a portion of the floor space, show no intention to make the partition a permanent accession to the freehold. Teaff v. Hewitt, 1 Ohio St. 511 [59 Am. Dec. 634]; Brown v. Wallis, 115 Mass. 156.
Injunction dissolved and petition dismissed.
Swing and-Smith, JJ., concur,