Court Opinion

ID: 6013134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 11:01:44.982751+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:26.342477
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), rendered August 10, 1995, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245) or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.