Court Opinion

ID: 9383983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-31 16:00:48.050544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:49.353498
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 21-3257
                        ___________________________

        David Woody; Kendra Jackson; L.W.; D.E.J.; D.A.J.; E.W.; K.W.

                                     Plaintiffs - Appellants

                                        v.

John Halferty, Jasper County Sheriff; Jacob Halferty; Marc Headdington; Janice
Bragg; Jasper County Animal Rescue League; Jasper County Sheriff Department;
Jasper County; Jasper County Animal Control and Welfare Board; Polk County;
                                 James Byle

                                     Defendants - Appellees
                                  ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: March 23, 2023
                             Filed: March 31, 2023
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       David Woody and his family appeal the dismissal of the lawsuit they brought
after Jasper County seized their dogs. Having carefully reviewed the record and the
parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court 1 had jurisdiction, was
not required to recuse, and did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed the family’s
case as a sanction for their delays and failure to comply with a court order. See
Buffets, Inc. v. Leischow, 732 F.3d 889, 898 (8th Cir. 2013) (holding that
noncompliance with the removal statute does not require reversal if the district court
had subject-matter jurisdiction when it entered judgment); Rodgers v. Curators of
the Univ. of Mo., 135 F.3d 1216, 1222 (8th Cir. 1998) (upholding a dismissal under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) when “any lesser sanction would have involved further delay
or forced [the defendants] to try their case without completing discovery”). We
accordingly affirm the judgment and deny the motion to remand. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

      1
        The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
                                      -2-