Court Opinion

ID: 988468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:52:48.258625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:20.012468
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-7817

LEROY HENRY,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DOCTOR QUINONES,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-94-949-R)

Submitted:     January 18, 1996            Decided:   February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART,
P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Henry v. Quinones, No. CA-94-949-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 11,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2