Court Opinion

ID: 9954427
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-26 14:00:45.018757+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:42.524978
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13904    Document: 12-1     Date Filed: 03/26/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-13904
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       DIANA YAZMIN LUGO,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       BIRMINGHAM-JEFFERSON COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY,

                                                   Defendant-Appellee.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                     D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cv-00362-ACA
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13904     Document: 12-1      Date Filed: 03/26/2024    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                23-13904

       Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Diana Lugo appeals from the district court’s “sanction judg-
       ment entered on October 2, 2023.” However, the court did not
       impose sanctions on Lugo during the October 2 hearing or at any
       other time. Accordingly, Lugo’s notice of appeal fails to designate
       an existing judgment or order, and we lack jurisdiction over her
       appeal. See Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. Of Cnty. Comm’rs, 162 F.3d 653,
       661 (11th Cir. 1998) (noting that a notice of appeal must designate
       an existing judgment or order, not one that is merely expected or
       within the appellant’s contemplation when the notice of appeal is
       filed); Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.