Court Opinion

ID: 3086831
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:58:37.548989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:06.875090
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00581-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MARY FOWLER,                                                          Appellants,

                                            v.

GUS MONTIS, ARGIRO INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.,                               Appellee.

               On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                        of Nueces County, Texas.

                          ORDER OF ABATEMENT
               Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes
                             Order Per Curiam
       Appellant Mary Fowler appeals the trial court’s judgment of eviction signed by the

trial court on October 18, 2013. The judgment states that appellees Gus Montis and

Argiro Investments, L.L.C. were entitled to a writ of possession. On October 28, 2013,

appellant filed a notice of appeal in the county court. On the same date, appellant filed a
“Personal Surety Bond,” in which appellant bound to pay the sum of $5000 and on which

appellant’s attorney serves as a surety.

      On January 13, 2014, appellees Gus Montis and Argiro Investments, L.L.C. filed a

“Motion to Enforce Judgment and Issuance of a Writ of Possession for Failure to File

Proper Supersedeas Bond”. Appellees argue the writ of possession was never served

and appellant failed to file the appropriate supersedeas bond to stay the writ as required

by Texas Property Code 24.007. See TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007 (West Supp.

2012) (“A judgment of the county court may not under any circumstances be stayed

pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a

supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”).

      Appellant and appellees both state the trial court entered an order modifying its

judgment of eviction on December 11, 2013. Our record on appeal does not include this

order. Appellee contends the order was entered after the trial court’s plenary power had

expired.

      Having reviewed this record, we conclude findings of fact and conclusions of law

are necessary to proper presentation of this appeal. As such, we ABATE the appeal and

REMAND the cause to the county court for a hearing to determine whether its writ of

possession was stayed, whether appellant timely and sufficiently filed a supersedeas

bond, and its jurisdiction to modify the supersedeas bond.        The county court shall

prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing these issues and any other

findings and conclusions that it deems relevant and appropriate pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 24. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24. The county court’s findings and

                                            2
conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. The supplemental clerk’s

record and the reporter’s record from the abatement hearing shall be filed with this Court

no later than March 6, 2014. If the county court requires additional time to comply, the

county court should so notify the Clerk of this Court. This appeal will be reinstated after

the supplemental clerk’s record and the reporter’s record is filed.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
10th day of February, 2014.

                                             3