Court Opinion

ID: 9845877
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:29:56.417022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:24.239441
License: Public Domain

O’CONNELL, J.,
specially concurring.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in Dimick v. Linnell, 240 Or 509, 402 P2d 734 (1965) and McConnell v. Herron, 240 Or 486, 402 P2d 726 (1965), I would not regard the violation of ORS 483.126 (1) as significant in the solution of the present case. Hereafter, when this court employs the formula that the violation of a statute is negligence, I shall, yielding to the judgment of the majority of the court, refrain from further comment unless it appears to me that the practice produces an unjust result.
Denecke, J., joins in this opinion.