Court Opinion

ID: 9845569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:24:30.972894+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:14.207658
License: Public Domain

*250Miller, J.,
dissenting: I respectfully disagree with the conclusion reached by my distinguished colleagues, and would adopt the logical and persuasive opinion written for a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals by Judge Abbott. It seems to me that the legislature clearly anticipated the problem which this case illustrates, and provided protection for the affected tenured teachers by K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 12-2904(e). The majority’s opinion pulls the blanket of tenure out from under many tenured teachers. This plaintiff was obviously singled out from among fifteen teachers for nonrenewal.
I would reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Prager, J., not participating.