Court Opinion

ID: 1014214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:13:13.886708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:38.901450
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Alexander Pastene appeals the district court’s order adopting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants in Pastene’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pastene v. Beaufort County Sch. Dist,
  
  No. CA-02-3880-9-2-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED