Court Opinion

ID: 1003258
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:23:47.156376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:11.411704
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOVENETO MONZELLO TINSLEY, a/k/a Jo Jo,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-98-111, CA-99-2882-10)

Submitted:   November 30, 2000            Decided:   January 5, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joveneto Monzello Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se.      William Kenneth
Witherspoon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joveneto Monzello Tinsley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Tinsley, Nos. CR-98-111; CA-

99-2882-10 (D.S.C. May 22, 2000).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2