Court Opinion

ID: 7881115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:25:38.893826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:54:27.578779
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed October 24, 1995, answering a question certified by the district court as important and doubtful is affirmed. The district court granted VanEngelenburg's motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution on double jeopardy grounds but certified the double jeopardy question to the court of appeals. The court of appeals answered the question in the negative and reversed the order dismissing the prosecution. VanEngelenburg's double jeopardy argument is answered by our decision inState v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. 1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice