Court Opinion

ID: 7747690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:13:20.521918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:37.575576
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
As we did in Stretcher v. State, 01-2943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.