Court Opinion

ID: 9671580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:39:42.040417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:10.908800
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing
HARWOOD, Justice.
In our opinion in about the twenty-sixth paragraph, we referred to the original compensation settlement receipt executed by appellee on 5 July 1963. Inadvertently the word “period” was omitted following “disability” in the phrase “for disability shown below * * * ” This phrase should have read “for disability period shown below * **”
In brief on application for rehearing, counsel for appellee states: “From reading the court’s opinion it appears that the ap-pellee receipted the appellant for all disability he might have had.”
Actually, we had set out the receipt of 5 July 1963, in the forepart of our opinion,with the word “period” included. The omission of the word “period” in the second reference would seem to be self correcting, but to remove any ambiguity, we hereby correct our opinion to the extent of including the word “period” after the words “for disability” as the same appear in the second reference to the settlement receipt of 5 July 1963.
In brief on application for rehearing, counsel has largely reargued the points already considered by us in our original opinion. We adhere to our original conclusions.
Opinion corrected; application for rehearing overruled.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.