Court Opinion

ID: 9697245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:09:24.109797+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:30.089889
License: Public Domain

*271Per Curiam
on Motion for Rehearing.
In a motion for reargument the substituted plaintiff-appellee (Snyder) makes the claim, supported by affidavit, that the case was not called for trial on September 16, 1958, although the defendant-appellant’s (Williams’) statement to that effect in his answers to both the first and second motions to set aside the judgment of non pros and in his brief filed in this court was not denied as of record. But regardless of whether that be a fact or not, we think the action of the trial court in granting the non pros was not such as to warrant the reopening of the enrolled judgment on the ground of mistake.
The motion for reargument is therefore denied.