Court Opinion

ID: 9524835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 02:57:39.614455+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:12:06.622336
License: Public Domain

Bronson, J.
(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. As the majority notes, there is currently a split of authority concerning the applicability of the 180-day rule where defendant would not be entitled to concurrent sentencing. In my opinion, MCL 780.131 et seq.; MSA 28.969(1) et seq., does not apply where the sentences must run consecutively. People v Loney, 12 Mich App 288; 162 NW2d 832 (1968), People v Ewing, 101 Mich App 51; 300 NW2d 742 (1980).
I would reverse.