Court Opinion

ID: 6341067
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-16 18:00:41.449868+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:16.149854
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-50894     Document: 00516319741         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/16/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                                                         FILED
                                                                     May 16, 2022
                                  No. 21-50894
                                Summary Calendar                    Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                         Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Nelson Keith Fleming,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:21-CR-74-1

   Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Nelson Keith Fleming has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Fleming has filed two responses. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-50894     Document: 00516319741          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/16/2022

                                   No. 21-50894

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as
   well as Fleming’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2