Court Opinion

ID: 8677096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:46:17.270695+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.834381
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Grady, No. 5:12-cv-00144-RJC, 2014 WL 4829067 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 27, 2014). Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *532legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.