Court Opinion

ID: 1000962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:48:39.777299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:50.416293
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7523

JAIME ACEVEDO,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

D. A. GARRAGHTY,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke.    James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-99-288-7)

Submitted:   February 24, 2000             Decided:   March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime Acevedo, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant At-
torney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jaime Acevedo seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See Acevedo v. Garraghty, No. CA-99-

288-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1999).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2