Court Opinion

ID: 21216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:42:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:17.568450
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-11272
                           Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN MENA,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 3:99-CR-17-ALL-X
                       --------------------
                           June 23, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Benjamin Mena has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).     Mena received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.

     Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5th

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                No. 99-41111
                     -2-

Cir. R. 42.2.