Court Opinion

ID: 3113882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:19:21.061684+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:54.142578
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-10-00164-CV
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                       
                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       
                                  AT AMARILLO
                                       
                                    PANEL A
                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 28, 2010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                            NYLES MARTIN, APPELLANT
                                       
                                      v.
                                       
                       CACV OF COLORADO, LLC, APPELLEE 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
             FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
                                       
               NO. 2008-561,931; HONORABLE JUDY C. PARKER, JUDGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                       
Appellant, Nyles Martin, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer desires to pursue it.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  While Martin's motion requests that costs be charged to the party incurring them, there is no valid agreement of the parties to allocate costs in this manner.  See Tex. R. App. P. 6.6.  Therefore, all costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a timely motion for rehearing.  No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.

								Mackey K. Hancock
									Justice