Court Opinion

ID: 9818908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 06:12:16.25809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:28.205853
License: Public Domain

EISMANN, Justice,
specially concurring.
I concur in the majority opinion, but simply write to illustrate the absurdity of Parkway’s intransigence. Because it stubbornly refused to pay its $6,800 debt to Campbell, she was awarded $48,989.62 in attorney fees and court costs in the magistrate court and $18,429.23 in attorney fees and costs in the district court. Thus, Parkway will have to pay an additional sum of $67,418.85, plus interest, to Campbell in its frivolous attempt to avoid a $6,800 debt. In addition, it has undoubtedly paid its own counsel, and this Court will award Campbell additional attorney fees and costs on this appeal.