Court Opinion

ID: 9412360
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-29 21:00:49.682566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:11.739254
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519      Doc: 14        Filed: 07/28/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1519

        SAUNDRA TAYLOR,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC; MGM NATIONAL HARBOR
        CASINO; STEVEN MANNING,

                            Defendants - Appellees,

                     and

        JOHN DOE,

                            Defendant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
        Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:21-cv-03192-DKC)

        Submitted: July 25, 2023                                        Decided: July 28, 2023

        Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519      Doc: 14         Filed: 07/28/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Saundra Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jeremy Steven Schneider, JACKSON LEWIS PC,
        Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519      Doc: 14         Filed: 07/28/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Saundra Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion to

        reconsider the court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part her motion for leave

        to amend her civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

        28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.

        R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The

        order Taylor seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

        collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     DISMISSED

                                                     3