Court Opinion

ID: 997789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:01:56.454886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:06.342083
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6922

CURTIS LAMONT SMITH,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES FRENCH, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-97-890-5-F)

Submitted:   January 26, 1999          Decided:     February 10, 1999

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Curtis Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998).     We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court.      See Smith v. French, No. CA-97-890-5-F

(E.D.N.C. June 9, 1998).     We deny Smith’s motion for appointed

counsel.    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2