Court Opinion

ID: 8909833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 02:32:03.923776+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:26.235848
License: Public Domain

BY THE COURT:
A substantial question about the jurisdiction of the district court, upon which ours depends, to entertain this cause has arisen since the filing of this appeal. See Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, et al., - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 1905, 60 L.Ed.2d 508 (1979). That decision arguably destroys major jurisdictional bases of the action, and the record indicates the jurisdictional amount required for federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 is in doubt. Nevertheless, the parties had little reason to address these questions prior to the handing down of Chapman, supra ; and we are unwilling to attempt to resolve them on a record assembled without reference to them. We therefore intimate no opinion on them, but direct the district court to address them and to enter an appropriate order. This being an interlocutory appeal, no remand is necessary for this action by that court. Janousek v. Doyle, 313 F.2d 916 (8th Cir. 1963). We retain this appeal on our docket pending the action directed. It is so
ORDERED.