Court Opinion

ID: 1006493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:12:10.472681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:57.970864
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

OMAR CYRILLE REAVIS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-97-153-A)

Submitted:   January 17, 2002             Decided:   January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omar Cyrille Reavis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Omar Cyrille Reavis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).*   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Reavis, No. CR-97-153-A (E.D.

Va. filed July 30, 2001; entered Aug. 1, 2001).    We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

     *
       Although Reavis characterized the motion as seeking recon-
sideration of the court’s denial of a prior § 2255 motion, the
latter motion raised new, unrelated claims and was properly con-
strued by the district court as a successive § 2255 motion.

                                  2