Court Opinion

ID: 656406
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:26.004981
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 818
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Clarence Sheldon JUPITER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Thomas J. WILSON, IV, Esq., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6824.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 27, 1993.Decided:  October 29, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Jupiter v. Wilson, No. CA-93-504-R (W.D. Va.  July 2, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 The district court construed Jupiter's claim as properly filed pursuant to  Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.  Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), because Jupiter identified his attorney as a federal public defender in his complaint.  Jupiter's attorney is not amenable to damages under either § 1983 or Bivens, regardless of whether he is a state or a federal public defender