Court Opinion

ID: 9520552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 01:43:32.911405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:24.419937
License: Public Domain

*745FLEER, J., Concurring.
I concur in the judgment because People v. Lopez (2012) 55 Cal.4th 569 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 559, 286 P.3d 469] and People v. Dungo (2012) 55 Cal.4th 608 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 527, 286 P.3d 442] require finding the admission of Dr. Reynolds’s testimony did not violate the confrontation clause.
Appellant’s petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied July 24, 2013, S210914. Werdegar, J., did not participate therein.