Court Opinion

ID: 4279647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-30 19:00:25.79273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:37.271195
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-6178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

FRANCISCO SALINAS-CASTILLO,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00188-REP-4)

Submitted: May 24, 2018                                           Decided: May 30, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Salinas-Castillo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Francisco Salinas-Castillo appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salinas-Castillo, No. 3:10-cr-

00188-REP-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2