Court Opinion

ID: 7629152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 18:17:14.325442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:11.255756
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash service of process. We agree and reverse, concluding that the record does not support the conclusion that the Florida condominium was the “usual place of abode” of the Peruvian appellant. See Moschetta v. Atlantic National Bank of Broward, 540 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., STONE, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.