Court Opinion

ID: 996524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:52:24.126224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:03.289497
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CARL HEADLEY CHAMBERS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James C. Turk, District Judge;
James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-29-C-H, CA-
97-102-R)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998           Decided:   October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Headley Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Carl Headley Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Chambers, Nos. CR-93-29-C-

H; CA-97-102-R (W.D. Va. May 22, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2