Court Opinion

ID: 1006659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:22.896429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:47.703985
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7802

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

OMADAT SINGH,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-97-34, CA-99-712)

Submitted:   January 31, 2002          Decided:     February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omadat Singh, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Omadat Singh seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   United States v. Singh, Nos. CR-97-34; CA-99-712

(E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2