Court Opinion

ID: 41499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 21:05:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:58.942316
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 11, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-11142
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CEDRIC DEMICHAEL BUTLER,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                   USDC No. 3:04-CR-100-ALL-G
                      --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Cedric Demichael Butler appeals the 71-month sentence

imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession of a

firearm by a felon.   18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2).      He

argues that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated at

sentencing in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296

(2004), because his sentence was enhanced on the basis of facts

not alleged in the indictment, admitted by him, or proved to a

jury beyond a reasonable doubt.   The Government argues that the

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 04-11142
                                 -2-

appeal is barred by the appeal waiver provision in Butler’s plea

agreement.    Butler contends that the waiver does not bar the

appeal because the waiver contained an exception for an appeal of

a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum punishment and

because at the time of his plea “Blakely was not the law in the

Fifth Circuit or any federal jurisdiction.”

     The record reflects that Butler knowingly and voluntarily

waived his right to appeal his sentence.    See United States v.

Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 450-51 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v.

Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 545-46 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v.

Cortez, 413 F.3d 502, 503 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

502 (2005).    The appeal waiver is enforceable and bars his claims

on appeal.

     AFFIRMED.