Court Opinion

ID: 6946880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:26:40.370822+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:56.801280
License: Public Domain

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by Lockwood, J. Wattles sued Lalor before a Justice of the Peace, who rendered a judgment in his favor for $84-44. The cause was removed to the Will Circuit Court by appeal, where Lalor plead his discharge, as a bankrupt, under the Act of Congress, passed the 19th August, 1841. To this plea Wattles demurred, on the ground that the voluntary part of the Bankrupt Law violated .the Constitution of the United States. The Circuit Court of Will county sustained the demurrer, and gave judgment for the plaintiff below. To reverse this judgment, the cause is brought to this Court by writ of error. The only question submitted for our consideration is, whether the voluntary part of the Bankrupt Law is a violation of the Constitution of the United States. This is truly a grave and momentous question. As it arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States, its ultimate decision devolves on the Supreme Court of the Union, and it is matter of deep regret that the question has not been presented to that tribunal, whose determination can alone put an end to all controversy on the subject. Fortunately, however, this Court is not without strong- indications of what will be the decision of that Court, whenever the question shall be brought before it. The Bankrupt Act has been before most of the Judges of the Supreme Court on their respective Circuits, and questions either directly or indirectly made as to its constitutionality, and we believe that a decided majority of the Judges have pronounced the law to be constitutional. If the Supreme Court of the United States had expressly decided this point, it would be our imperative duty to conform to their decision. And when it can be clearly, ascertained, from the individual action of the Judges, what will be their decision when the question shall be presented to them in their collective capacity, it seems to be reasonable that we should follow in the path thus indicated. We do not, therefore, deem it our duty to enter into any argument on the subject. This question has, however, been argued before the Supreme Court of New York, and the law held by that Court to be constitutional. We, therefore, consider it incumbent on this Court to decide that the voluntary branch of the Bankrupt Act is constitutional and valid. The judgment of the Court below is consequently reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.