Court Opinion

ID: 4189290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-07-25 19:01:21.901307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:24.456037
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  David L. Huggard appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for judicial recusal and the production of documents. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Huggard,
  
  No. 1:13-cr-00005-JPJ-1, 2017 WL 1181015 (W.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2017). We deny Hug-' gard’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be
   
   *258
   
  fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED