Court Opinion

ID: 988907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:59:22.077655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.843312
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TERRY JAMES STAFFORD,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-119, CA-95-83-3-P)

Submitted:   March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry James Stafford, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Crane Anderson,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Stafford, Nos. CR-93-119; CA-95-83-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 21, 1995). We

also deny Appellant's request for appointed counsel on appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2