Court Opinion

ID: 2283061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:58:42.8735+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:49.457104
License: Public Domain

331 S.W.3d 722 (2011)
Terry WOODS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94909.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
February 22, 2011.
*723 Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Terry Woods appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).