Court Opinion

ID: 9816289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 02:48:45.669986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:14.200112
License: Public Domain

McNAMEE, J:
I concur in the judgment which in effect sustains the conviction of the appellant on two separate charges of contempt. While the appellant is not prejudiced by this court’s action in modifying the trial court’s judgment by considering findings 1 and 2 as a single act and in so considering findings 3, 4 and 5. I am of the opinion that this court’s judgment should be:
Judgment affirmed as to trial court’s findings of guilty No. 1 and 5, and reversed as to findings 2, 3, 4 and 6 because of lack of evidence to sustain same.