Court Opinion

ID: 5787690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:03:36.788769+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:09.423986
License: Public Domain

On July 13, 2004 the plaintiff Leston Black allegedly fell onto the tracks of a subway station in Brooklyn, and was struck by a train entering the station.
The defendants met their initial burden on their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint by submitting evidence sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, that the defendant *696train operator could not have stopped the train in time to avoid the accident (see Stanley v New York City Tr. Auth., 45 AD3d 832, 833 [2007]; see also Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In opposition, however, the plaintiffs submitted sufficient evidence to raise triable issues of fact as to how long the injured plaintiff was on the train tracks prior to being struck by the train and whether the train operator could have stopped the train in time to avoid the accident (see Stanley v New York City Tr. Auth., 45 AD3d at 833; see also Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Eng, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.