Court Opinion

ID: 9899985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-18 01:00:27.764133+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:58.351143
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-20121         Document: 00516972452             Page: 1      Date Filed: 11/17/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                           FILED
                                                                                  November 17, 2023
                                       No. 23-20121                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar                                        Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jose Perez-Ramirez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:21-CR-592-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Perez-
   Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-20121    Document: 00516972452          Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/17/2023

                                  No. 23-20121

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2