Court Opinion

ID: 4128111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:36:02.962165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:15.435849
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
                                          GREG        ABBOTT

                                            November 19, 2010

The Honorable Joe Deshotel                            Opinion No. GA-0818
Chair, Committee on Business and Industry
Texas House of Representatives                        Re: Whether a civilian advisory committee to the
Post Office Box 2910                                  police chief may review information maintained in
Austin, Texas 78768-2910                              a police department personnel file under Local
                                                      Government Code, section 143.089(g)
                                                      (RQ-0869-GA)

Dear Representative Deshotel:

        Local Government Code section 143.089(g) authorizes a fire or police department to
"maintain a personnel file on a fire fighter or police officer employed by the department for the
department's use" and imposes certain restrictions on disclosure of material in such a file. TEX. Lac.
GOV'T CODE ANN. § 143.089(g) (West 2008). You inform us that a home-rule municipality is
contemplating establishing a "police civilianreview board" (the "Board"), which would be appointed
by the municipality's governing body "and assigned to the police chief to serve as an advisory body
to the chief in the review of disciplinary matters involving such issues as use of force, official
oppression, discharging firearms, infliction of serious bodily injury to another or any other internal
investigation assigned and approved by the chief.'" You ask whether such a Board may review
information maintained in a police department personnel file under Texas Local Government Code
section 143.089(g). Request Letter at 1.

        Section 143.089 provides for two different personnel files. TEX. Loc. GOV'T CODE ANN. §
143.089 (West 2008); Ealoms v. State, 983 S.W.2d 853, 858 (Tex. App.-Waco 1998, pet. ref'd).
Subsections (a) through (f) concern the file that a director of a civil service commission must
maintain for each fire fighter and police officer (a "civil service file"). TEX. Loc. GOV'T CODE ANN.
§ 143.089(a)-(f) (West 2008). These subsections further specify information that both must and
must not be in such a file. Id. The director may release information in a fire fighter's or police
officer's civil service file only with the person's written consent or as otherwise affirmatively
required by law. Id. § 143.089(f).

       Subsection (g) allows a fire or police department to maintain a personnel file (a "department
personnel file") separate from and independent of the civil service file:

       ISee Request Letter at 1 (available at http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov).
The Honorable Joe Deshotel - Page 2                      (GA-0818)

                   A fire or police department may maintain a personnel file on a fire
                   fighter or police officer employed by the department for the
                   department's use, but the department may not release any information
                   contained in the department file to any agency or person requesting
                   information relating to a fire fighter or police officer. The department
                   shall refer to the director or the director's designee a person or agency
                   that requests information that is maintained in the fire fighter's or
                   police officer's personnel file.

Id. § 143.089(g) (emphasis added). A member of the department or "a subsidiary element of the
department" may use or access a department personnel file "for the department's use." See City of
San Antonio v. Tex. Att'y Gen., 851 S.W.2d 946, 951 (Tex. App.-Austin 1993, writ denied)
(observing that "[t]here is no suggestion in the statute that [department] 'use' may not include use
or physical control by a subsidiary element of the department,,)2 However, information in a
department personnel file is confidential, "and the statute expressly forbids [its] release to anyone
[outside the department] under any circumstances." Id. at 949,952. 3 Consequently, subsection (g)
allows the department or a "subsidiary element of the department" to use a department personnel file,
but prohibits its disclosure to others. Id. 4

        Whether members of a civilian advisory board may view a personnel file under section
143.089(g) of the Local Government Code will depend on (1) the Board's status and function as a
part of the department and (2) limitations on the board's use of subsection (g) files to department
purposes only, which will depend on the specific facts of the Board's appointment. See City of San
Antonio, 851 S.W.2d at 951; Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0283 (2000) at 2-3 (department personnel
file could be utilized by persons in the "chain of command"). While you state in general terms that
the Board would be appointed "exclusively for internal police department purposes," you have not

         2See also In re Jobe, 42 S.W.3d 174, 180 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2001, no pet.) (stating that "a [subsection] (g)
file is not required to be maintained, but if one is maintained, it is for the department's use, the material may not be
released by the department, and any requests for information will be referred to the director or the director's designee");
City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Express-News, 47 S.W.3d 556, 561 n.!, 563-65 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2000,
pet. denied) (concluding that the nature of information, rather than the identity of the departmental unit that maintains
it, determines whether subsection (g) precludes its disclosure).

          'See also In re Jobe, 42 S.W.3d at 181 (concluding that if a civil court's review power is properly invoked, it
may conduct an in camera inspection to determine if information in a subsection (g) file should have been placed in the
civil service file); Ealoms, 983 S.W.2d at 859 (stating that department subsection (g) files are "privileged by statute,"
but may be reviewed in camera by a trial court in a criminal case).

         4The Public Information Act proscribes the distributipll of confidential information as a criminal offense. TEx.
GOV'T CODE     ANN. § 552.352(a) (West 2004). Section 552.352 also precludes an officer or employee from using
confidential information "for a purpose other than the purpose for which the information was received or for a purpose
unrelated to the law that permitted the officer or employee to obtain access to the information." Id. § 552.352(a-l)(I).
For purposes of subsection (a-I), "a member of an advisory committee to a governmental body who obtains access to
confidential information in that capacity is considered to be an officer or employee of the governmental body." !d. §
552.352(a-2).
The Honorable Joe Deshotel - Page 3          (GA-0818)

provided specific information establishing the Board's status and function as a part of the
department, or how the Board's use of subsection (g) files will be limited to department purposes.
See Request Letter at 2. Consequently, we are unable to advise whether a civilian advisory
committee may review information maintained in a police department personnel file under Texas
Local Government Code section 143.089(g).
The Honorable Joe Deshotel - Page 4           (GA-OSIS)

                                       SUMMARY

                       Whether a civilian advisory committee may review
               information maintained in a police department personnel file under
               Texas Local Government Code section 143.0S9(g) will depend on
               specific facts establishing the committee as part of the department and
               limiting the committee's use of the files to department purposes only.

                                              Very truly yours,

DANIEL T. HODGE
First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID J. SCHENCK
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee

William A. Hill
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee