Court Opinion

ID: 4165255
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-05-02 16:07:50.572242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:38:06.374744
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 15-940V
                                    Filed: February 13, 2017
                                         UNPUBLISHED
*********************************
LEWIS STEVEN BECKHAM,                             *
                                                  *
                         Petitioner,              *
v.                                                *
                                                  *        Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               *        Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               *
                                                  *
                         Respondent.              *
                                                  *
****************************
Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Ann Donohue Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On August 27, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome following
receipt of his September 22, 2014 influenza vaccination. On September 26, 2016, the
undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the
parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 39).

       On January 5, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
No. 45.) Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $34,663.60 and attorneys’
costs in the amount of $2,096.44 for a total amount of $36,760.04. Id. at 2. In

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement indicating
petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

        On January 17, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF
No. 46). Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that she “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.” Id. at 2. Petitioner “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master
exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and
costs.” Id. at 3.

       On January 18, 2017, petitioner filed a reply. (ECF No. 47). Petitioner argues
that respondent’s reliance on the special master’s discretion is prejudicial and further
addresses the basis for the fees and costs requested in this case.

      The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

      Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $36,760.04 3 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel,
Alison H. Haskins, Esq. 4

        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
                                                           s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Chief Special Master

3This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4Petitioner requests that the check be forwarded to Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, at 1605 Main Street,
Suite 710, Sarasota, Florida 34236.

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                      2