Court Opinion

ID: 4079467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-04 19:01:15.414567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:39.624063
License: Public Domain

*152
   
  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Charles A. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion and various other motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 5:11-cr-00032-RLV-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

  AFFIRMED