Court Opinion

ID: 5250551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:12:12.618653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:56.398790
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
The complaint states a cause of action, but whether the plaintiff can furnish evidence that entitles it to recover cannot be well decided on the present record. The issue, at least between plaintiff and the American Title and Trust Company, is, which one takes title from a common grantor. It may be unfortunate that the decision of the paramount question may fall, if the right to use the present remedy is not sustained, upon a mere technical question of the kind of possession that would enable the plaintiff to maintain the present form of action. And yet that objection is urged. But this court does not decide it, because the record does not present the chains of title of the parties as it should, and also the facts concerning the actual possession of the land, or indeed whether it is occupied or unoccupied. The present decision is limited to ruling that the court erred in dismissing the complaint upon the ground that it does not state a cause of action. What further decision the full facts may demand cannot be forecast. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.