Court Opinion

ID: 5627513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:58:25.285952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:40.472678
License: Public Domain

MacIntyre, J.
Although the testimony of witnesses for the State contained seeming or actual contradictions, yet the jury having nevertheless believed the witnesses, and their testimony being sufficient, if true, to authorize a conviction, there was no abuse of discretion in denying h new trial. Davis v. State, 94 Ga. 399 (19 S. E. 243); Clements v. State, 159 Ga. 425 (125 S. E. 800); Laseter v. State, 52 Ga. App. 261 (2) (183 S. E. 76). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and, Guerry, J., concur.