Court Opinion

ID: 9697910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:36:53.148567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:36.624761
License: Public Domain

BECKER, Justice.
I cannot concur in the result at this time. The appeal was timely as an appeal from ruling on motion for new trial, as well as from allowance of attorney fees.
The notice of appeal was from “the final judgment and decision in this cause entered on the 27th day of December, 1967, and from the final order and decree herein, and from all interlocutory rulings and decisions adverse to appellant.” It is hy-pertechnical to rule that the notice did not include the order overruling motion for a new trial. The defendant has not had its appellate rights as provided by our rules.
STUART and LeGRAND, JJ., join in this dissent.