Court Opinion

ID: 994521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:11.189791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.360328
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7664

WINSTON LLOYD,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

         versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden, E.C.I.; ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
97-3562-S)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Lloyd v. Beshears, No. CA-97-3562-S (D. Md. Nov. 5, 1997). We deny
Appellant's motion to supplement the evidence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2