Court Opinion

ID: 9353375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-11 19:00:59.041641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:53.364810
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50059         Document: 00516606304             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/11/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50059
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 11, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Rodney Lynn Hinkle,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:21-CR-597-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Lynn Hinkle has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Hinkle has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50059    Document: 00516606304         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/11/2023

                                 No. 22-50059

   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2