Court Opinion

ID: 4463745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-12 18:07:15.164726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:07.070491
License: Public Domain

People v Castang (2019 NY Slip Op 08939)

People v Castang

2019 NY Slip Op 08939

Decided on December 12, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 12, 2019

Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Webber, Gesmer, JJ.

10557 86/17

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vRicardo Castang, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Ben A. Schatz of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Kevin McGrath, J.), rendered October 5, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 12, 2019
DEPUTY CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.