Court Opinion

ID: 4857979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 00:01:14.237075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:31.636224
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10602      Document: 00515994430         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/25/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  No. 20-10602                         August 25, 2021
                                Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Carolina Villasenor,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:19-CR-302-8

   Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Carolina Villasenor has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Villasenor has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10602     Document: 00515994430          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/25/2021

                                   No. 20-10602

   briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Villasenor’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2