Court Opinion

ID: 1020530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:52:45.243227+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:01.038486
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6682

CLARENCE GILLIS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORA HUNT,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  James C. Dever III,
Magistrate Judge. (5:05-hc-00696-D)

Submitted: September 26, 2006             Decided: September 29, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla        Hollis, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North       Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Clarence Gillis seeks to appeal Respondent’s motion for

summary judgment.   This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The filing Gillis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.     Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                               - 2 -