Court Opinion

ID: 3556118
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:07:05.282332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:29:20.091630
License: Public Domain

In the absence of argument or brief from any of the parties to the proceeding, it is not impossible that the case may have been misunderstood. From the record on which the case has been submitted, it is inferred that all the property involved is real estate, as to which an administrator has ordinarily no duty to perform. Nothing is perceived, as the allegations of the petition are understood, to take the case out of the ordinary rule. The administrator is therefore advised that he has no duty to perform as to the partition of the remaining real estate between the legatees entitled.
It is not alleged that the First Congregational Church is one of the feeble Congregational churches of New Hampshire. It is assumed that it is not. There appears to be no question that the First Congregational Church owns one fourth of the real estate involved, and the defendant Lawrence one half. The only question is as to the title to the remaining fourth. If the New Hampshire Home Missionary Society was intended by the testator to be made trustee, or can be appointed trustee upon the facts alleged, it would be entitled to advice as to the proper disposition of the fund. But its title to the fund as trustee has not yet been determined. If the court might in this proceeding properly express an opinion as to the validity of the devise to the feeble Congregational churches of New Hampshire, it will not do so in the absence of the heirs of Gideon Hardy, who would own one fourth of the estate should the devise fail for lack of a trustee, because of its indefiniteness. Haynes v. Carr, 70 N.H. 463, 480; Bailey v. McIntire, 71 N.H. 329; 2 Per. Tr., s. 719.
Case discharged.
All concurred. *Page 611