Court Opinion

ID: 5667499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 13:49:43.122534+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:28.906774
License: Public Domain

Coleman, S.
—At the time of the judicial settlement of the accounts of the executors, in 1866, their duties as such executors with reference to the property then accounted for ceased, excepting only the duty imposed upon them by the decree to apply the balance of the estate remaining in their hands in the manner therein directed, and when that was done they had no further connection with such property as executors. They had previously advertised for creditors, and any creditor presenting a claim thereafter could recover nothing from them unless subsequently other property should come into their hands belonging to the estate. By the decree the executors were directed to re-tain certain bank stock upon a trust created by the will. Row the fact that the trustees and the executors are the same persons does not place such a creditor of the estatev in any better condition with reference to’ the trust fund than would have been the case if the executors had transferred the trust property over to other persons as trustees. Ror has such creditor any greater rights in this trust property because it remains in character the same as when held by the executors, than he would have had had such property been converted into money, and the money paid to the trustee.
Some doubt may arise as to the correctness of the latter statement because of the liability of the testator’s estate growing out of the fact that the stock still remains upon the books of the bank in the name of the testator. It must nevertheless be true, because no claim, by reason of this liability was made by any one upon the executors before the title to the property had passed by the decree from them as executors. A creditor may pursue property for the payment of his debt after it has passed from iha executor, but that is not done by means of proceedings against executors. If the receiver can compel the payment of his claim in these proceedings it must grow out of some other reason than that he is a general creditor of the testator.
These accounting trustees received the capital stock of these two banks as so much property already invested to be held upon the trust set forth in the will. If instead of receiving bank *171stock they had received cash and had invested it in these bank stocks and during their holding of them one of the banks had failed, rhe liability created by the ownership of the stock of the failing bank would have had to have been met by the trustees from funds derived from the sale of the other, then there would have been no residuary estate to resort to. True, they might not leg'allv invest trust moneys in such securities, but this difficulty could have been removed by tire testator directing them so to invest by his will, and that, in effect, is what was done in this case. The testator took a short cut. Instead of directing the investment of a certain sum in stock of these banks, he directed his executors to hold certain stock in which he had already invested. Such being the case the legatees interested under the will in the trust fund took such interest subject to all the necessary incidents resulting from the character of the property set apart by the testator for them, and among others was this very possibility of loss by assessment as well as on the other hand the possibility of becoming more valuable during the continuance of the trust.
I am, therefore, of the opinion that these trustees must sell the Highland Bank stock and from the proceeds pay the receiver’s claim and distribute the balance among those entitled under the will.
By the will the use of this bank stock was given to the testator’s daughter Catherine during her life and at her death it was given to her “lawful heir or heirs * * * and in case she leave no heir or heirs at law at her death surviving her, then” such bank stock was given to certain of the testator’s children. Catherine was never married and left no lawful issue. In the meantime several of the testator’s children who were given a contingent interest in the bank stock have died. The interest of such as have died lapsed with their death, they not having survived the event upon which their interest would become vested, that is, the death of their sister Catherine leaving no issue. The balance of the fund will, therefore, be distributed among those surviving Catherine.