Court Opinion

ID: 5792603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:12:20.269949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:19.179878
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the de*876fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered December 14, 2006, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the verdict convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Fisher, J.P., Florio, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.