Court Opinion

ID: 7591107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:45:04.33059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:39.715966
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction and sentence. However, we reverse the imposition of costs because the costs were imposed without adequate notice to and an opportunity to be heard by the defendant. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
WARNER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part with opinion.