Court Opinion

ID: 8675013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:36:30.212749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.096523
License: Public Domain

*251Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chester Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 5:04-cr-00031-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.