Court Opinion

ID: 9899546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-16 21:01:02.512215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:37.385015
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6065      Doc: 11         Filed: 11/15/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6065

        MIGUEL ANGEL RIVERA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL; WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN K. GANG;
        SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEPA; OFFICER AT
        J.C.I. MS. JACKSON; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. MESSON; OFFICER AT J.C.I.
        MR. ASONGOING; WARDEN AT W.C.I. RONALD S. WEBER; COREY
        WALKER, Western Correctional Case Manager; OFFICER A. ZEMBOWER,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01517-PX)

        Submitted: October 26, 2023                                 Decided: November 15, 2023

        Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6065      Doc: 11         Filed: 11/15/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez appeals the district court’s order dismissing without

        prejudice * his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim for relief under

        28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).     We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rivera-Alvarez v. Hill, No. 1:22-cv-

        01517-PX (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

        legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

        would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

               *
                 Because the district court dismissed the action without allowing Rivera-Alvarez a
        further opportunity to amend the complaint, the order is final and appealable. See Britt v.
        DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022).

                                                    2