Court Opinion

ID: 4358396
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-14 13:36:45.158692+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:47:28.156030
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-18-00764-CV

                                   Theresa Johnson, Appellant

                                                 v.

          Monica Velez, Kylie Riney, Kathryn Miller, and Patrice Wise, Appellees

      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. 296,602-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               On December 14, 2018, this Court notified appellant Theresa Johnson that her notice

of appeal—that was filed on November 15, 2018—appeared untimely and that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she filed a response explaining how this Court has

jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) (allowing appellate court to dismiss case

for want of jurisdiction after giving ten days’ notice to parties). To date, Johnson has not filed

a response.

               In the underlying proceeding, the trial court signed a final order granting appellees’

amended motion to dismiss on June 18, 2018. The order states that it “is a final order that disposes

of all claims and causes of action” filed by Johnson against appellees. Johnson timely filed a motion

for new trial, which the trial court denied on September 14, 2018. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 320, 329b.
Purporting to appeal from the trial court’s order denying the motion for new trial, Johnson filed a

notice of appeal on November 15, 2018.

                Although appellant’s motion for new trial extended the deadline for filing a notice

of appeal, the applicable time period for perfecting an appeal began on June 18, 2018, the date that

the trial court signed the order granting appellees’ amended motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.1(a) (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 90 days after judgment or order signed when

party timely files motion for new trial); Tex. R. Civ. P. 301 (“Only one final judgment shall be

rendered in any cause except where it is otherwise specifically provided by law.”); In re Vaishangi,

Inc., 442 S.W.3d 256, 260 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (“[A] trial court can render only one

judgment in a case.”); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that

“general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a

final judgment”). Thus, Johnson’s deadline for filing a notice of appeal was on or before

September 17, 2018, or, with a timely filed motion for extension of time, October 2, 2018. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 26.3 (allowing fifteen day extension of time to file notice of appeal);

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Johnson, however, did not file her notice

of appeal until November 15, 2018. Because Johnson’s notice of appeal was untimely, we do not

have jurisdiction to consider this appeal and we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

                                                  2
                                             __________________________________________
                                             Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 11, 2019

                                               3