Court Opinion

ID: 8610327
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 07:54:10.283507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:20.174114
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jose Guadalupe Gomez seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
*728We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003), and Guadalupe does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“ [Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
We do not consider Guadalupe’s contentions regarding physical presence and moral character because Guadalupe’s failure to establish hardship is dispositive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*728ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.