Court Opinion

ID: 4664631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-03 20:08:50.57539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:37.311262
License: Public Domain

Matter of Santoriella (2021 NY Slip Op 01262)

Matter of Santoriella

2021 NY Slip Op 01262

Decided on March 3, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Per Curiam.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 3, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2020-04881

[*1]In the Matter of Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, petitioner; Robert P. Santoriella, respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2588655)

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 27, 1994, under the name Robert Philip Santoriella.

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, NY (Thomas J. Murphy of counsel), for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

OPINION & ORDER
The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh,
and Thirteenth Judicial Districts served the respondent on July 27, 2020, and July 30, 2020, as authorized pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6) by means of substituted service, with a notice of petition and a verified petition, both dated June 22, 2020, and duly filed those papers with this Court together with an affidavit of service.
The petition contains one charge of professional misconduct, alleging that the respondent failed to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations of 15 complaints of professional misconduct, in violation of rule 8.4(d) and (h) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0).
The notice of petition directed the respondent to serve and file his answer to the petition within 20 days after service upon him of the notice of petition and the petition. To date, the respondent has neither served nor filed an answer to the petition, as directed.
The Grievance Committee now moves to deem the charge against the respondent established based upon his default and to impose such discipline upon him as this Court deems appropriate. Although the motion papers were served, by mail, upon the respondent on September 10, 2020, he has neither opposed this motion nor interposed any response thereto.
By separate motion, the Grievance Committee moves, inter alia, to immediately suspend the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(1) and (3), upon a finding that he is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. Service upon the respondent of the motion papers, as authorized pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6) by means of substituted service, was effectuated on July 27, 2020, and July 30, 2020. To date, the respondent has neither opposed this motion nor interposed any response thereto.
Accordingly, the Grievance Committee's motion to deem the charge against the respondent established based upon his default is granted, the charge in the verified petition is deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. The Grievance Committee's separate motion, inter alia, to immediately suspend the respondent from the practice of law is denied as academic.
MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, DILLON, CHAMBERS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the Grievance Committee's motion to deem the charge in the petition dated June 22, 2020, established is granted, and the Grievance Committee's separate motion, inter alia, to immediately suspend the respondent, Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, from the practice of law is denied as academic; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent, Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see  22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Robert P. Santoriella, admitted as Robert Philip Santoriella, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f).
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court