Court Opinion

ID: 9767200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:12:27.812683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:29.488432
License: Public Domain

ROWLEY, Judge,
concurring:
I join in the judgment of the Court and in Judge Spaeth’s opinion. I do so, however, with the understanding that we are not in any way restricting or limiting the Legislative direction contained in § 3902 of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3902, or the statement of this Court in Commonwealth v. Morin, 237 Pa.Super. 533, 541-542 n. 3, 352 A.2d 189, 193 n. 3 (1975) that § 3902 of the Code means that a finding that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of the form of theft charged in the information “would not be fatal to the finding of guilt” where “the record contains *97clear and convincing evidence supporting beyond a reasonable doubt” the conclusion that appellant was guilty of conduct that constitutes one of the other forms of theft set forth in Chapter 39 of the Code.