Court Opinion

ID: 999210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:22:17.186618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:40.702053
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-1432

ERNEST E. SMITH,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

REVELLE LEWIS, Judge,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (MISC-98-36-2)

Submitted:   July 8, 1999                  Decided:    July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ernest Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.     We have

reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no revers-

ible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.    See Smith v. Lewis, No. MISC-98-36-2 (E.D. Va. Jan.

8, 1999).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2