Court Opinion

ID: 9907320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-06 07:10:06.406926+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:01:13.609841
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed December 1, 2023

                                    S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-01198-CV

                        IN RE CHI YEN TRAN, Relator

           Original Proceeding from the 469th Judicial District Court
                             Collin County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 469-55653-2018

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia
                            Opinion by Justice Garcia
      In her November 28, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator contends

that the trial court’s July 7, 2023 Agreed Final Judgment is void and should be

vacated.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). We also strike relator’s petition and attached appendix because it contains

unredacted sensitive data in violation of rule 9.9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9.

                                            /Dennise Garcia/
                                            DENNISE GARCIA
231198F.P05                                 JUSTICE

                                         –2–