Court Opinion

ID: 3078670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:38:06.652603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:59:53.433827
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00306-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

DR. ROLANDO POSADA,                                                            Appellant,

                                             v.

DR. JUAN M. GARCIA,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 445th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 22, 2014. On

October 2, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely

filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of

the Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
30th day of October, 2014.

                                             2