Court Opinion

ID: 8475867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:39:47.342053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:25.554390
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Lamont Buchanan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Buchanan, No. 3:93-cr-00039-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2009). We *531dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.