Court Opinion

ID: 992442
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:51:59.499601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:34.982103
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PAUL J. GIBSON, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-52-NN, CA-96-13-4)

Submitted:   May 30, 1997                  Decided:   June 16, 1997

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul J. Gibson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Gibson, Nos. CR-92-52-NN, CA-96-13-4 (E.D.
Va. Aug. 1, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for release pending

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2