Court Opinion

ID: 8067077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 10:53:55.958137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:12.767408
License: Public Domain

GAYNOR, J.
The plaintiff demurs as follows: “To each of the several defences contained in the amended answer and numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4 on the ground that the same are and each of them is insufficient in law on the face thereof,” i. e., in the words of section 494 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allows demurrers to counterclaims and defences.
But on reference to the answer the so-called “defences” which are demurred to are found not to be defences at all, but only denials. In the nomenclature of pleading a “denial” is not a “defence.” Code Civ. Proc. § 500 et seq.; Burlcert v. Bennett, 35 Misc. Rep. 318, 71 N. Y. Supp. 144.
Each of these denials is that “defendant denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief,” etc. The criticism is that the defendant does not thereby deny that “he has” any knowledge or information, etc. But if that be a defect then there is no denial and therefore no issue raised on the complaint. No demurrer is provided for or necessary for such a case as that.
The demurrer is overruled with costs.