Court Opinion

ID: 2950498
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:44:03.294296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:30.140911
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-83,209-01

                        IN RE MAXIMILLIANO GONZALES, Relator

                ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
         CAUSE NOS. B-99-2083-0-CR-B, B-99-2084-0-CR-B & B-99-2085-0-CR-B
                         IN THE 156TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM BEE COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 156th District Court of Bee County on September 15, 2003, and that the application has not

yet been forwarded to this Court.

       In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Bee

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
                                                                                                   2

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Bee County. Should the response

include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with

the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file

a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: May 20, 2015
Do not publish