Court Opinion

ID: 9896402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-10 12:10:54.101679+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:52.117742
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                           TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                   No. 10-23-00051-CR

DAMIEN TYRONE ADKISON,
                                                                Appellant
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                                                Appellee

                             From the 19th District Court
                              McLennan County, Texas
                             Trial Court No. 2016-1327-C1

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Damien Tyrone Adkison was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and

indecency with a child by contact and sentenced to 37 years and five years in prison,

respectively. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

       Adkison’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in

support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and

that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the
record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude

that counsel has performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S.

at 744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly v. State, 436

S.W.3d 313, 319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2008).

       In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the

proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988); accord Stafford v.

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or

"without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486

U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire

record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe

v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial

court's judgment.

       Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Adkison is granted.

                                           TOM GRAY
                                           Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson, and
       Justice Smith
Affirmed; motion granted
Opinion delivered and filed November 9, 2023
Do not publish
[CRPM]

Adkison v. State                                                                         Page 2