Court Opinion

ID: 42856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 21:34:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:55.469022
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 20, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                             No. 05-40158
                           Summary Calendar

                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                versus

                        RENSO MIGUEL PENA,

                       Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 1:03-CR-132-2
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The court-appointed appellate counsel for Renso Miguel Pena

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).       Pena has not filed

a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.     Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.