Court Opinion

ID: 1006466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:11:55.638128+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:50.956339
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7652

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHARLES EDWARD MCMILLON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-98-105-BO, CA-01-366-5-BO)

Submitted:   January 17, 2002             Decided:   January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward McMillon, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Charles Edward McMillon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. McMillon, Nos. CR-98-105-BO;

CA-01-366-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 31, 2001; entered Sept. 4,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2