Court Opinion

ID: 9956237
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-01 16:00:57.897874+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:42.311650
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-5116     Document: 010111024835         Date Filed: 04/01/2024      Page: 1
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                             Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                               April 1, 2024
                          _________________________________
                                                                             Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                                 Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                            No. 23-5116
                                                      (D.C. No. 4:22-CR-00190-JFH-1)
  RICHARD ALAN SISNEY,                                          (N.D. Okla.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
                          _________________________________

 Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. **
                   _________________________________

        This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand for

 Resentencing, in which they request that the court remand this appeal to the district court

 for resentencing. Upon consideration and review of the record, the court:

        A.     Grants the motion;

        B.     Remands this case to the district court for resentencing and to undertake, in

               its discretion, all necessary and appropriate proceedings required to

        *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
 law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
 persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
        **
           Because this matter is being decided on a Joint Motion to Remand for
 Resentencing this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not
 materially assist in the determination of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);
 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellate Case: 23-5116    Document: 010111024835        Date Filed: 04/01/2024   Page: 2

              resentence defendant-appellant Richard Alan Sisney in accord with the

              Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing filed here; and

       C.     Directs the Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith.

                                             Entered for the Court

                                             CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, Clerk

                                            2