Court Opinion

ID: 747898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 23:11:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:17:03.977178
License: Public Domain

129 F.3d 121
NOTICE:  Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.BECK MATERIALS COMPANY, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION;  Robert B.Reich, Secretary of Labor, Respondents.
No. 96-2984.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 23, 1997.Filed Oct. 14, 1997.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission.
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
Beck Materials Company (Beck) petitions for review of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission) order affirming three citations and civil penalties assessed by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) pursuant to Section 105 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.

2
The citations arose from a December 7, 1994 accident wherein Beck's quarry foreman Doug Laird was seriously injured while making adjustments to a conveyer belt at Beck's rock-crushing operation, without deenergizing the conveyer system.  Following the accident, the Secretary issued three citations for mandatory safety violations, charging that Laird was making adjustments to the conveyor belt without deenergizing and locking out the conveyor system, in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 56.12016;  that Laird failed to use a safe means of access to make adjustments to the belt, in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 56.11001;  and that the belt pulleys were not sufficiently guarded to prevent contact with the pinch point, in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 56.14107(a).  The Secretary determined that the violations were "significant and substantial" and that violations related to the failure to provide safe access and to deenergize the machinery were the result of Beck's "unwarrantable failure" to comply with mandatory health standards.  See 30 U.S.C. § 814(d)(1).  The Secretary proposed civil penalties in the amount of $3,500.

3
Beck challenged the proposed penalties, asserting its employees were instructed to deenergize equipment in connection with repairs, safe access was readily available to its employees, and all moving equipment parts were thoroughly guarded.

4
Following a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the ALJ modified the citations and ordered Beck to pay $2,800.  Beck's petition for discretionary review with the Commission was denied, and Beck timely petitions for review.

5
After thorough review of the record we conclude that the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.  See 30 U.S.C. § 816(a)(1).

6
Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.