Court Opinion

ID: 4414157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-04 11:56:01.705485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:15.232978
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-89,380-01

                         EX PARTE JOHNNY LEE DAVIS, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
            CAUSE NO. A-16-5063-CR(HC1) IN THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM ARANSAS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of criminal

solicitation and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Davis v. State, No. 13-17-00103-CR (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi -

Edinburg July 26, 2018) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed

and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. We remanded this
                                                                                                      2

application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

       The trial court held a habeas hearing, heard live testimony and considered documentary

evidence. Based on that testimony and evidence, the trial court has entered findings of fact and

conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had

been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Ex

parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

       We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 13-17-

00103-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. A-16-5063-CR from the 36th District Court of

Aransas County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

       Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: July 3, 2019
Do not publish