Court Opinion

ID: 1004766
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:46:02.981983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:14.877565
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-7822

DONALD HARDING,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DEAN R. WALKER, Superintendent,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-140-5-1-MU)

Submitted:   June 21, 2001                 Decided:   June 27, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Harding, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Donald Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Harding v. Walker, No. CA-00-

140-5-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2000).   We also deny Harding’s motion

to compel preparation of a trial transcript. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2