Court Opinion

ID: 2868498
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 02:25:51.723605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:45.227010
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00342-CR

Fredrick Darrell Moore, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10136, HONORABLE JOHN L. PLACKE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant Fredrick Darrell Moore was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after pleading no contest to an indictment accusing him of murder.  See Tex. Pen. Code
Ann. 19.02 (West 2003).  Less than one year later, the court adjudicated appellant guilty and
sentenced him to forty years in prison and a $2500 fine.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and he was advised of his
right to examine the record and file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				___________________________________________
				David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed:   April 22, 2004
Do Not Publish