Court Opinion

ID: 9578364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:44:31.449514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:19:47.417554
License: Public Domain

Per curiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in a garnishment action to collect the amount for a prior judgment against the garnishee’s insured. The insurer enumerates as error the denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict.
1. The trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict.
2. The trial court did not err in denying insurer’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Judgment reversed.

Hall, P. J., Eberhardt, P. J., Been, Quillian and Stolz, JJ., concur as to Division 1. Bell, C. J., Pannell, Evans and Clark, JJ., dissent. Bell, C. J., Pannell, Evans, Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur as to Division 2. Hall, P. J., Eberhardt, P. J., Deen and Quillian, JJ., dissent.

*800Nightingale, Liles & Dennard, Thomas E. Dennard, Jr., for appellee.