Court Opinion

ID: 9511373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:04:12.775807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:00.263652
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE NELSON
concurs.
¶16 I join this Opinion with two caveats. First, I concur in the analysis in ¶ 14 only because this case involves the statutory remedy of post-conviction relief. Second, while I joined the Court’s decision in Peña v. State, 2004 MT 293, 323 Mont. 347, 100 P.3d 154, I have since reconsidered my position and now conclude that Justice Leaphart’s concurring and dissenting opinion in that case is correct.
¶17 With those caveats, I concur.