Court Opinion

ID: 6540780
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:15:28.01806+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:49.424586
License: Public Domain

Enslish, C. J. Jacob Thomm, J.'W. Williams and W. T. Wallis, were summoned to appear at the January term, 1879, of the circuit court of White county, to answer a forfeiture taken at the preceding term of the court, upon the following bail-bond: “Walter D. Childress, being in custody, charged with an assault and battery upon the person of one A. N. Foster, and being admitted to bail in the sum of five hundred dollars, we, Jacob Thomm, J. W. Williams and W. T. Wallis, hereby undertake that the above named Walter D. Childress shall appear in the circuit court, on the first day of the term in July, 1878, to answer said charge, and at all times shall render himself amenable to the orders and proceedings of said court in the prosecution of said charge, and if convicted shall render himself in execution thereof, and if he fails to perform either of these conditions, then we will pay to the state of Ar’kansas five hundred dollars. “Jacob Ti-iomm, [Seal.] “J. W. Williams, [Seal.] “W. T. Wallis, [Seal.]” The summons recited that, on the tenth of April, 1878, Walter D. Childress was arrested on a warrant issued by Thomas Owen, á justice of the peace of White county, charged with an assault and battery upon the person of one A. N. Foster, and, upon a hearing before the justice, was required to give bail for his appearance before the circuit court of White county, at its next term, etc., to answer said charge; then recites the execution of the above bail-bond, the failure of Childress to appear, etc., the forfeiture of the bond, etc. , ' The defendants filed an answer, setting up various objections to the validity of the bond, and made their answer a demurrer, which the court overruled, and they declined to plead further. a1Noplead_ Jntsastey ohn balfbonds! 2. Misde-MBANORS: j.p.must baiuonci°rcuit court. The case was submitted to the eourt by consent, and the court, after examining the justice of the peace who took the bond, permitted him to add his approval of it, which he stated he omitted to do at the time it was taken, thus: “Approved, this the twelfth day of April, 1878. “ Thomas Owen, “ Justice Peace, Red River township, White county.” The court gave judgment against the defendants for the penalty of the bond, overruled a motion for a new trial, and they took a bill of exceptions, and appealed. I. In proceedings against bail, in a criminal case, on forfeited bail-bond, no pleadings are required on the part of the state, but it is made the duty of the clerk to issue a summons, requiring the bail to appear, etc., to show cause why judgment should not be rendered against them, etc. Gantt's Digest, secs. 1739, 1743. Under a like statute in Kentucky it has been decided that, as the bail-bond; or recognizance, itself, is the basis of the action, it must, in connection with the order of forfeiture, present a perfect cause of action. Roberts v. Commonwealth, 7 Bush, 430; Commonwealth v. Fisher, 2 Duvall, 376. II. One of the objections taken to the validity of the bail-bond in the answer, is, that Childress, being charged with an assault and battery, which is „a misdemeanor, and within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace, on whose warraut he was arrested, it was his duty to try the case, and he had no authority to take a bail bond for the appearance of the accused before the circuit court, to answer the charge there. The statute provides that: “ When the arrest is made in the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed, the magistrate before whom the defendant is carried shall forthwith proceed to an examination of the charge; and, if the offense charged be a felony, shall commit, hold to bail, or discharge, as the case may be, or, if he have jurisdiction to hear and finally try the charge, shall proceed to final determination and judgment.” Gantt’s Digest, sec. 1688. Justices of the peace have jurisdiction to try and punish misdemeanors. Constitution of 1874, art. 7, sec. 40. The circuit courts have also concurrent jurisdiction. The State v. Devers, 34 Ark., 188. There seems to be no statute authorizing a justice of the peace, who has jurisdiction to try a misdemeanor, to decline to try it, and bind the accused over to the circuit court-for indictment and trial there. It is his duty to try it himself. An assault and battery is a misdemeanor. A bail-bond in a criminal case, taken by an officer not authorized by law to take it, is void. Cooper et al. v. State, 28 Ark., 278. It is needless to pass on other objections made to the bond. Reversed arid remanded, with instructions to discharge the appellants.