Court Opinion

ID: 4867464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 02:24:58.041098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:24.520047
License: Public Domain

We have for review Rowles v. State, 954 So.2d 1278
(Fla. 5th DCA 2007), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal cited as authority its decision in Moore v.State, 909 So.2d 500 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), noticeinvoking discretionary review filed, No. SC05-1779 (Fla. Sept. 28, 2005). At the time the Fifth District issued its decision in Rowles, its Moore decision was, and still is, pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.;Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1981).
We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition ofLarimore v. State, 2 So.3d 101 (Fla. 2008). When our decision in Larimore became final, we issued an order directing respondent in the present case to show cause why we should not accept jurisdiction, quash the decision under review, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Larimore. *Page 534 
Respondent in its response agrees we should so proceed.
We accordingly grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Fifth District for reconsideration upon application of this Court's Larimore decision.
It is so ordered.
QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.
PERRY, J., did not participate.