Court Opinion

ID: 988317
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:50:50.301965+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:37.267513
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-6766

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RUSSELL MARCUM, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-154, CA-94-1067-2)

Submitted:   January 11, 1996             Decided:   January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Marcum, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael M. Fisher, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Marcum, Nos.
CR-92-154; CA-94-1067-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 24, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2