Court Opinion

ID: 8437103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:55:54.036726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:44.273864
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Craig Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jones’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further re*879sponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.