Court Opinion

ID: 9866518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 13:10:51.868108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:12.462615
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                      San Antonio, Texas
                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                         No. 04-23-00738-CV

                                             Jason PAUL,
                                               Appellant

                                                   v.

                                            THE GROVE,
                                              Appellee

                      From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2018CV04906
                           Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice
                  Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 20, 2023

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           On July 10, 2023, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to appeal a judgment in

trial court cause number 2018-CV-04906. On August 15, 2023, the district clerk filed the clerk’s

record showing the trial court signed a final judgment in that cause number on August 31, 2018.

           A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. Sweed v. Nye,

323 S.W.3d 873, 875–76 (Tex. 2010); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. 1997); TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.1(b) (providing appeal is perfected when a notice of appeal is filed). Rules 26.1 and

26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribe the time period during which a notice of
                                                                                      04-23-00738-CV

appeal or a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal must be filed to perfect an appeal

in a civil case. See id. R. 26.1, 26.3. They provide when a party does not file a timely post-

judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, a notice of appeal is due either thirty days after

the final judgment is signed or fifteen days later so long as an extension motion is simultaneously

filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. Because appellant did not file a timely post-judgment motion

extending the appellate timetable, the notice of appeal was due by September 4, 2018 or September

19, 2018 along with an extension motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(a), 26.3.

       Because appellant did not file his notice of appeal until July 10, 2023, it appeared untimely

filed, and we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction. We cautioned appellant if he failed to respond to our order by the date ordered, we

would dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant did not file

a response. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id.

                                                   PER CURIAM

                                                 -2-