Court Opinion

ID: 1201268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 04:57:53.521574+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:17.885317
License: Public Domain

686 S.E.2d 513 (2009)
COUCOULAS/KNIGHT PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, a North Carolina municipality and its Board of Commissioners, Defendants.
No. 404A09.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 5, 2009.
As Amended November 18, 2009.
Robert E. Hornik, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Town of Hillsborough.
LeAnn Nease Brown, Raleigh, for Coucoulas/Knight Prop.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 683 S.E.2d 228.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 1st of October 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."
Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiffs new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.