Court Opinion

ID: 7081861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 09:49:51.616994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:54.421971
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Sally E. Claybrooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Claybrooks v. Newsome, No. CA-00-1097-AM (E.D.Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *244contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.