Court Opinion

ID: 9778847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 21:22:38.51356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:14.182062
License: Public Domain

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing
BELCHER, Judge
It is again insisted that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury that the burden of proof was upon the state to establish appellant’s sanity at the time of the trial; that it further erred in refusing to charge the jury that on the issue of insanity they could consider the enormity of the crime charged; and that the trial court also erred in refusing to permit the introduction into evidence on the issue of insanity appellant’s photograph taken two days after the commission of the alleged offense. Appellant in effect restates his position which he took originally without citation of authority.
The record has been re-examined in the light of appellant’s contentions and it appears that such contentions were considered and properly disposed of in the original opinion.
The motion is overruled.
Opinion approved by the Court.