Court Opinion

ID: 3097465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:44:43.703975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:22:07.536255
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-12-00148-CV
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                       
                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       
                                  AT AMARILLO
                                       
                                    PANEL A
                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 20, 2012
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
           CROWELL SNF, LLC D/B/A CROWELL NURSING CENTER, APPELLANT
                                       
                                      v.
                                       
TERRI WALL, ELIZABETH KAY BAIZE, VICKIE TAMPLEN, DEBRA SANDERSON, AND KEITH MCDANIEL, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE H. MCDANIEL, APPELLEES 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                 FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF FOARD COUNTY;
                                       
                   NO. 4675; HONORABLE DAN MIKE BIRD, JUDGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                       
Appellant, Crowell SNF, LLC d/b/a Crowell Nursing Center, has filed an agreed motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal because appellees, Terri Wall, Elizabeth Kay Baize, Vickie Tamplen, Debra Sanderson, and Keith McDaniel, on behalf of the Estate of Charlie H. McDaniel, have dismissed their case against appellant.  The motion is signed by attorneys for both parties.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  There being no agreement of the parties to the contrary, costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and will issue our mandate forthwith.

							Mackey K. Hancock
							        Justice