Court Opinion

ID: 8483269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-11 01:00:32.884664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:45.036097
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10334      Document: 00516541794         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/10/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                  No. 22-10334
                                Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                      November 10, 2022
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                  Clerk

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Cesar Enrique Mireles,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:11-CR-96-45

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Enrique
   Mireles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mireles has filed a response. The record is not

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10334      Document: 00516541794          Page: 2    Date Filed: 11/10/2022

                                    No. 22-10334

   sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Mireles’s claim
   of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim
   without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
   829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Mireles’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2