Court Opinion

ID: 4639235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-03 17:02:17.479008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:47.513416
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    HASINI PERKINS,                            §
                                               §
        Defendant Below,                       §   No. 351, 2020
        Appellant,                             §
                                               §   Court Below—Superior Court
        v.                                     §   of the State of Delaware
                                               §
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                         §   Cr. ID No. 0811004552 (N)
                                               §
        Plaintiff Below,                       §
        Appellee.                              §

                              Submitted: November 12, 2020
                              Decided:   December 2, 2020

Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

                                            ORDER

        After consideration of the notice to show cause and the parties’ responses, it

appears to the Court that:

        (1)    On October 22, 2020, the appellant, Hasini Perkins, filed a notice of

appeal from a Superior Court order, dated August 20, 2020 and docketed on August

31, 2020, denying his motion for reduction/modification of sentence. A timely

notice of appeal should have been filed by September 30, 2020.1 The Senior Court

1
 Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iv) (providing notice of appeal must be filed “[w]ithin 30 days after entry upon
the docket of a judgment or order in any proceeding for post-conviction relief”).
Clerk issued a notice directing Perkins to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed as untimely filed under Supreme Court Rule 6.

         (2)   In his response to the notice to show cause, Perkins states that he did

not receive a copy of the order and did not learn of the order until he received a copy

of the Superior Court docket on September 25, 2020. According to the State, the

Department of Correction has no record of incoming mail to Perkins in August or

September. In light of the evidence supporting Perkins’s claim that he did not

receive the August 2020 order in a timely manner, the State suggests that this Court

remand the matter with directions to the Superior Court to reissue the August 2020

order so that Perkins has the opportunity to file a timely notice of appeal.

         (3)   We agree that the proper course of action is to remand this matter to the

Superior Court. Upon remand, the Superior Court shall reissue the August 2020

order.

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within matter is

REMANDED to the Superior Court for further action in accordance with this order.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

                                         BY THE COURT:

                                         /s/ Gary F. Traynor
                                         Justice

                                            2