Court Opinion

ID: 1005969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:04:15.412011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.137962
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  John Cordero appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought to challenge certain orders in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
   
   *199
   
  recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
  
   Cordero v. United States Dist. Court,
  
  No. CA-01-2368-3-17-BD (D.S.C. July 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.