Court Opinion

ID: 5462084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:39:32.212784+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:55.937419
License: Public Domain

By the Court,

Cardozo, J.
It is unnecessary, and therefore improper, to express any opinion upon the construction or effect of the paper before us, because it is plain that upon the evidence presented it cannot be proved here.
The statute (Stat. at Large, p. 68, § 63, Edm. ed.) only allows an exemplified or authenticated copy to be proven when the original will is in the possession off a foreign “court or tribunal of justice.” It cannot be pretended that a notary public is either a court or a tribunal of justice, according either to the common or the civil law; and if, as the counsel for the appellant, seemed to suppose, there is, which we think is not the case, anything in the law of Bavaria which confers upon a notary any such power or position as would bring his office within the definition of a court or a tribunal of justice, there is no evidence before us to show it, and it should have been proven as a fact on .the part of the appellant.
The order below must, therefore, be affirmed with costs.
Ingraham, Sutherland and Cardozo, Justices.]