Court Opinion

ID: 9912865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-25 08:09:02.609109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:05:49.486622
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued December 21, 2023

                                      In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                              NO. 01-23-00909-CV
                            ———————————
                      IN RE TARA STURGEON, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator, Tara Sturgeon, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus asserting that the trial court had abused its discretion by: (1) “not

returning” relator’s minor children to her custody; (2) “by entering the January 24,

2023 Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing”; (3) terminating relator’s

visitation to her minor children after a July 20, 2023 hearing; and (4) failing to
provide relator with effective counsel.1 Relator requested that the Court “issue a

writ of mandamus directing the [trial] court to restore constitutional protections of

the family, [and to] return the children to their parents, immediately.”

      Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that relator has failed to

establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A)

(relator required to provide appendix which “must contain” certified or sworn copy

of any “document showing the matter complained of”), 52.7(a) (relator “must file”

record with mandamus petition containing “certified or sworn copy of every

document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any

underlying proceeding”), 52.8(a); see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837

(Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

1
      The underlying case is In the Interest of L.S., O.S., and A.S., Children, Cause No.
      2023-00153J, in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable
      Michelle Moore presiding.

                                           2