Court Opinion

ID: 990486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:22:22.371064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:56.989085
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-1525

MICHAEL R. FULLER; NANCY J. HALSTEAD,

                                           Plaintiffs - Appellants,

          versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; NLI/PLC/MACO III,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-96-421-A)

Submitted:   September 20, 1996           Decided:   October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Fuller, Nancy J. Halstead, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re-

lief on their request for preliminary injunctive relief or, in the

alternative, a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v.
Virginia, No. CA-96-421-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2