Court Opinion

ID: 9458469
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:52:48.702579+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:46.595900
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The contention is made that our decision ignores, overlooks and conflicts with United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715, 719-721, 91 S.Ct. 1041, 1045; 28 L.Ed.2d 434 (1971). To the contrary, we considered then and we consider now that our decision is wholly consistent with Coin & Currency, which recognizes power in the Secretary of the Treasury to return property but “upon such terms and conditions as he deems reasonable and just.”
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Bane is denied.