Court Opinion

ID: 989769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:11:32.815857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:39.123829
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6066

JONATHAN RANDALL FRIZZELLE,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN E. GREENBACKER, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-1334-R)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                  Decided:   July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Randall Frizzelle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Frizzelle v. Greenbacker, No. CA-95-1334-R (W.D. Va. Dec.
19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2