Court Opinion

ID: 6318361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-01 15:12:10.287459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:25.927765
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-22-00079-CV

                                  In re William Randy Suitor

                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator William Randy Suitor, an inmate in the Comal County Jail, filed a pro se

original petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.

P. 52.1.   Relator complains that he has been unlawfully confined pursuant to a defective

indictment.

               This Court does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal cases.

See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas corpus

jurisdiction of courts of appeals to situations where relator’s liberty is restrained by virtue of

order, process, or commitment issued by court or judge in civil case); see also Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. art. 11.05 (vesting “power to issue the writ of habeas corpus” in “[t]he Court of Criminal

Appeals, the District Courts, the County Courts, or any Judge of said Courts”).             As an

intermediate appellate court, our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); see also In re Wilkins, No. 03-20-00381-CV, 2020 WL

5608486, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 17, 2020, orig. proceeding).

               Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want

of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
                                           __________________________________________
                                           Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: March 1, 2022

                                               2