Court Opinion

ID: 5667704
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 13:50:10.940643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:29.702727
License: Public Domain

The Surrogate.
Hone of the papers submitted to me show, whether or not the guardian has filed his annual account, as required by law. But on search of the records of this office no account seems to have been filed, and therefore according to the well-settled rule, the guardian is not entitled to charge his commissions in annual rests.
In Morgan v. Hannas (13 Abb. Pr., N. S., 361), Judge Folgeb stated the general rule to be that annual rests of the accounts of an executor, or other trustee cannot be taken for the purpose of allowing him commissions at full rates upon the balance then found; but where annual rests are required by the special direction of a court for the sake of charging the trustee with interest, or by rule of court, or by the provisions of the statute, then full commissions may be computed upon the funds, excluding the investment of the principal.
A guardian is required by statute to file accounts with the Surrogate each year, and his accounts will then show necessarily annual rests, and if he has made his accounts annually, or at intervals, he may be allowed commissions in full upon each account.
But the account as rendered by the guardian makes annual rests, and he charges himself with interest on the fund in his hands for the succeeding year respectively, and having made rests for that purpose, he is entitled to his commissions at 2\ per cent, for receiving, for the first thousand dollars; 1|; per cent., on the balance as it does not exceed $9,000 in any instance, and 21 on sums paid out to the amount of one thousand, 1¿ per cent, for the amount paid out over and above that sum, and the account should be corrected in that respect, where there has been a charge of full commissions of 2\ per cent, on any sum above $1,000.
Order accordingly.