Court Opinion

ID: 9824591
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 10:56:17.375741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:52.270826
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
On this trial no questions were reserved for review, involving order of continuance, organization of the grand jury which found the indictment, the venire for the grand or petit jury, the organization of the regular juries for the week of the term at which the case was tried.. In the absence of any such question, such proceedings are, upon appeal, liresumed to have been regular and legal. Code 1923, § 3249. .
That the hide of a yearling found at a place with which the defendant was connected, in the best judgment of witness, “just like” the hide of the yearling stolen,* was permissible, as a shorthand rendition of collective facts, to which witness had already testified in detail. 13 Michie’s Digest, 691, par. 290.
Rehearing overruled.