Court Opinion

ID: 9946549
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-29 21:00:45.416308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:26.157246
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 29 2024
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 23-923
                                                D.C. No.
             Plaintiff - Appellee,              2:17-cr-00044-KJM-4
 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
JAYMAR ROSS,

             Defendant - Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of California
                   Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before:      FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

      Jaymar Ross appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

jury-trial conviction, time-served sentence, and 48-month term of supervised

release for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ross’s

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ross the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                         2                                     23-923