Court Opinion

ID: 8463182
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:48:31.494473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:11.051672
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Dewayne McGaha appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McGaha, No. 8:06-cr-01187-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.