Court Opinion

ID: 4670293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-22 20:02:23.85106+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:53.563547
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 19-0644V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

    SHANE BOWERS,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                         Filed: February 18, 2021
    v.
                                                            Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria
                                                            acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;
                       Respondent.                          Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                                                            Administration (SIRVA)

Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                   RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

       On May 1, 2019, Shane Bowers filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that the receipt of a tetanus vaccine in his right arm on
April 24, 2018 caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(SIRVA). Petition at 1, 6. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.

       On February 17, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
1. Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in his right

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2
  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
shoulder; his pain occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; his
pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was
administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain his
symptoms. Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “the statutory six-month sequela
requirement has been satisfied.” Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                  s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Chief Special Master

                                            2