Court Opinion

ID: 7616199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 13:01:30.623001+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:57.843146
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 21-1349V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

 JOHN ALLAIN,                                               Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                         Filed: June 28, 2022
 v.
                                                            Special Processing Unit (SPU);
 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                    Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
 HUMAN SERVICES,                                            Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria
                                                            acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;
                       Respondent.                          Brachial Neuritis

Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                   RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

       On May 13, 2021, John Allain filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered brachial neuritis as a result of his August 13,
2019 tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination. See Petition at ¶ 1.
Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than
six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on his
behalf as a result of his injury. Petition at ¶¶ 7, 9-10. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       On June 23, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
Specifically, Respondent indicates that it is his

      position that petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury
      Table and Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for brachial neuritis from
      his Tdap vaccine. Specifically, the pain in petitioner’s right arm and shoulder
      was a presenting symptom and occurred between two and 28 days after
      vaccination; EMG/NCS studies showed that petitioner’s injury was localized
      to the brachial plexus; motor, sensory, and reflex findings on physical
      examination and EMG/NCS studies were consistent in confirming that
      petitioner’s dysfunction was attributable to the brachial plexus; and no other
      condition or abnormality was present that would explain petitioner’s
      symptoms. 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(6).

Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that the statutory severity requirement and “all legal
prerequisites for compensation under the Act” have been satisfied.” Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                                          Chief Special Master

                                              2