Court Opinion

ID: 9438849
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 06:07:27.15204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:25:58.276139
License: Public Domain

*877Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN.
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 4, 2011, and published at 630 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2011) is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 272 [630 F.3d at 889], lines 15-16, replace < ... and we remand to the BIA for proceedings consistent with this opinion. > with < ... and we remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion to permit the government to put forth reliable evidence to show that the petitioner was convicted of an aggravated felony. >
With the opinion as amended, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Silverman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Cowen and Tashima have so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
No future petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.