Court Opinion

ID: 9907301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-06 01:00:34.592395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:58:34.949481
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-20652      Document: 00516990286         Page: 1     Date Filed: 12/05/2023

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                          FILED
                                 ____________
                                                                       December 5, 2023
                                  No. 22-20652                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                 ____________                                 Clerk

   John Doe 1, on behalf of themselves and a Class of all other similarly situated
   John and or Jane Doe employees of Harris County; John Doe 2, on behalf of
   themselves and a Class of all other similarly situated John and or Jane Doe
   employees of Harris County,

                                                            Plaintiffs—Appellants,

                                       versus

   Harris County, Texas; Lina Hidalgo, County Judge; Rodney
   Ellis, Precinct 1 Commissioner; Adrian Garcia, Precinct 2
   Commissioner; Jack Cagle, Precinct 4, Commissioner; Tom S.
   Ramsey, Precinct 3, Commissioner; Edward Gonzalez, Harris
   County Sheriff,

                                            Defendants—Appellees.
                   ______________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:21-CV-3036
                  ______________________________
Case: 22-20652         Document: 00516990286              Page: 2       Date Filed: 12/05/2023

                                          No. 22-20652

   Before Jones, Barksdale, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
            The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, the
   comprehensive district court opinion, and pertinent portions of the record.
   Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact. The district court’s
   judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that
   court.

            _____________________
            *
             Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
   be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th
   Cir. R. 47.5.4.

                                                2