Court Opinion

ID: 9711554
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:34:17.480826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:05.870651
License: Public Domain

PRICE, Judge,
concurring and dissenting:
I agree with the majority that on the basis of the record before us we cannot properly discharge our obligations for review concerning the best interests of Robert, Jr. Indeed, although apparently not challenged, I would extend this conclusion also to the award of custody concerning Cammy. However, I concur in the reversal and remand.
*487I dissent, however, concerning the prohibition against supervision of the Children’s Services of Tioga County. I rely upon my dissenting opinion in In re Frank, 283 Pa. Super. 229, 423 A.2d 1229 (1979).