Court Opinion

ID: 1008499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:41:11.766988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:58.818061
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for recon
   
   *258
   
  sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home,
  
  No. CA-99-683 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.