Court Opinion

ID: 4205208
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-09-21 19:01:05.464217+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:44:12.526262
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court’s orders deeming the Appellee’s statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appel-lee on Rodriquez’s claims of discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the rec
   
   *226
   
  ord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Rodriquez v. Fanning,
  
  No. 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED