Court Opinion

ID: 8181934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 22:53:28.434085+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:40:14.080083
License: Public Domain

STARCHER, Chief Justice,
concurring:
(Filed Jan. 6, 2000)
I agree with the Court’s opinion. I write separately to state my appreciation for this Court’s willingness to reverse a criminal conviction because a defendant didn’t get a fair jury panel.
In several recent cases, I have dissented because a majority of this Court was willing to tolerate a jury panel that I thought was arguably unfair. I believe that in the instant ease, we have taken the proper approach.
Ideally, we want our criminal justice process to be so even-handed that even a convicted defendant’s family will have to agree that a trial was fair — although that is probably too much to expect in most eases. One of the easiest and cheapest things we can do to further this goal is to only use jurors who are not even arguably suspect because of possible bias. That was our standard in the instant case, and it is one to which trial courts must adhere.