Court Opinion

ID: 1016739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:53:51.103661+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:23.318727
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Jesse Lowell Satterfield appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for leave to amend the complaint and to alter or amend the judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Satterfield v. West Virginia Dep’t of Environmental Protection,
  
  No. CA-02-191-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED