Court Opinion

ID: 2949857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:16:58.918103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:41:37.595362
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                             OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-77,149-01

                         EX PARTE BRIAN KEITH HORTON, Applicant

                    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                      CAUSE NO. 27498 IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to

burglary of a habitation, and received three years’ deferred adjudication community supervision.

Applicant’s period of community supervision was modified and extended several times, but he was

eventually adjudicated guilty and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his counsel at adjudication rendered ineffective

        1
            This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims, and found them to be without merit.
                                                                                                       2

assistance because counsel failed to present witnesses and evidence to explain or rebut the

allegations in the State’s motion to proceed to adjudication. Applicant also alleges that just before

the adjudication hearing, adjudication counsel brought to the trial court’s attention the fact that

Applicant’s father-in-law had been a defendant in a suit filed by the trial judge at an earlier date. The

matter was discussed in court and adjudication counsel did not seek the trial court’s recusal. At the

conclusion of the adjudication hearing, the trial court sentenced Applicant to the maximum available

sentence of twenty years’ imprisonment.

        The trial court appointed habeas counsel to represent Applicant, and on October 23, 2013,

the trial court held a hearing. Although Applicant himself was not present at the hearing, Applicant’s

adjudication counsel gave testimony addressing Applicant’s habeas claims.2 Adjudication counsel

testified that although he did not believe that it was appropriate to file a written motion to recuse the

trial judge at the time, in retrospect he believes that he should have done so, because it was what his

client wanted.

        The trial court has determined that trial counsel's performance was deficient in that counsel

did not file a written motion to recuse the trial judge from presiding over the adjudication, and that

such deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court also concludes that adjudication

counsel did not call witnesses or acquire the evidence his client wanted presented at the hearing.

Relief is granted. The judgment adjudicating guilt in Cause No. 27498 in the 3rd District Court of

Anderson County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Anderson

County to answer the charges as set out in the State’s motion to proceed to adjudication of guilt in

        2
         Adjudication counsel testified at the habeas hearing that he had submitted such an
affidavit, but the affidavit has not been included in the habeas record, before or after remand.
                                                                                                  3

this case The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate

of this Court issues.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 2, 2014
Do not publish