Court Opinion

ID: 9491445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 14:14:36.639045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:54:45.105782
License: Public Domain

A statement by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS, with whom WALD, Circuit Judge, concurs, dissenting from the denial of the suggestions of rehearing en bane is attached.
A statement filed by Circuit Judge TATEL, with whom WALD, Circuit Judge, concurs, dissenting from the denial of the suggestions of rehearing en banc is also attached.
*495Circuit Judge ROGERS would grant the suggestions of rehearing en banc.
Circuit Judge GARLAND did not participate in this matter.
ON SUGGESTIONS OF REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Respondent’s and Intervenor’s Suggestions of Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestions. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
Ordered that the suggestions be denied.