Court Opinion

ID: 52230
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:13:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:14.522132
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                 FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             APRIL 24, 2007
                              No. 05-14694                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                        ________________________

                   D. C. Docket No. 05-00005-CR-5-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

MARK ANTHONY MULLINS,

                                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                              (April 24, 2007)

Before BIRCH, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Mark Anthony Mullins, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2