Court Opinion

ID: 7499595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:22:13.373318+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:14.821671
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is REVERSED on the authority of State v. Netherly, 373 So.2d 470 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), and Wilson v. State, 363 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), and the cause is REMANDED for a. new trial. We have considered appellant’s remaining points and find them to be without merit.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.