Court Opinion

ID: 1032075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-06 05:23:44.121778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:17.611854
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The difficulties of the Plaintiff do not support a legal claim against the defendants. No defect is alleged in the foreclosure and sale of the Skyline Lane property. No breach of contract legal claim is alleged on behalf of himself or his wife. And no plausible tort claim is alleged. This court has read the opinions of the district court dated August 2, 2012 and November 6, 2012 and finds no error there, nor has any claimed error been briefed as is required.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.