Court Opinion

ID: 9368505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-04 01:00:28.895489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:08.747755
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10549         Document: 00516634898             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/03/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10549
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 3, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Rodney Lamond Bowman,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:20-CR-574-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney Bowman
   has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
   738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bowman
   has not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10549      Document: 00516634898            Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/03/2023

                                      No. 22-10549

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review.
          Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is ex-
   cused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2