Court Opinion

ID: 9405270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-27 21:00:54.375992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:20.643943
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1067      Doc: 11         Filed: 06/26/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-1067

        PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        MELISSA MITCHELL, Safety Manager; SCOTT COE, Plant Manager;
        BRITTANY HERMAN, Circa Plant Human Resource; NANCY YANG, Main
        Plant Coordinator; VALDESE WEAVER,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00232-MR-WCM)

        Submitted: June 22, 2023                                          Decided: June 26, 2023

        Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Pakuja Crystal Vang, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1067      Doc: 11        Filed: 06/26/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Pakuja Crystal Vang appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice

        her complaint alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.

        §§ 12101 to 12213. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vang v. Mitchell, 1:22-cv-00232-MR-

        WCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

        legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

        would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2