Court Opinion

ID: 2940159
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 22:02:27.883404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:24.526871
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,997

EX PARTE STEPHEN K. GILBERT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 05-00944-CRF-272-A IN THE 272ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM BRAZOS COUNTY

           Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.  Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).  Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment.  The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Gilbert v. State , No. 10-06-00232-CR (Tex. App. – Waco, November 14, 2007).  
            Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. We remanded this application to the trial court
for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
            Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court.  Based on that affidavit, the trial court
has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify
Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for
discretionary appeal pro se.  The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956
S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).  We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity
to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Tenth Court of Appeals
in Cause No. 10-06-00232-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 05-00944-CRF-272-A from
the 272nd Judicial District Court of Brazos County.  Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary
review with the Tenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate
issues.
 
Delivered: September 10, 2008
Do not publish