Court Opinion

ID: 8282568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 05:30:52.535177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:41.395546
License: Public Domain

On appeal. fenL°ntsW<may appeal; and a bond, descnbing him asimtheadother"defendant, is cor-Motion for a mandamus. The relator applied to the common P^eas to quash an appeal, because made by one of two defendants, against whom judgment was rendered, and be- , , , , . , , . , ’ cause the appeal bond was executed by him alone, describing him as impleaded with the other defendant, instead of being executed by both defendants; which motion was denied. And this court now refused to grant a mandamus, saying the common pleas had decided correctly.