Court Opinion

ID: 1008129
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:44.623466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:26.808793
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CR-98-13, CA-01-131-4-H)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se.   John Samuel Bowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Terrance Lamont Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Moore, Nos. CR-98-13; CA-01-

131-4-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2002).        We deny Moore’s motion to

transfer additional records from the district court because the

record on appeal is complete.        We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2