Court Opinion

ID: 9693231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 16:31:05.723267+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:43.006418
License: Public Domain

Dethmers, C. J.
(concurring). I believe it to be quibbling to say that plaintiff was not, at the time she suffered her injury, going from her work while on the premises where her work is to be performed and within a reasonable time after her working hours.
For reasons stated in my opinion in Freiborg v. Chrysler Corporation, 350 Mich 104, I think that the 1954 amendment to part 2, § 1, of the workmen’s compensation act  applies to subsequent proceedings even though they involve an injury which antedated the amendment, and that the award to plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs to her.