Court Opinion

ID: 9400846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-09 17:01:26.143468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:48.454128
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                              FILED
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
                                                                               JUN 9 2023
                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RIVKA STEINBERG, individually and on             No.   22-15287
behalf of all others similarly situated,
                                                 D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05568-EMC
              Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.                                              MEMORANDUM*

ICELANDIC PROVISIONS, INC.,

              Defendant-Appellee.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of California
                   Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

                      Argued and Submitted March 29, 2023
                      Submission Vacated March 31, 2023
                           Resubmitted June 2, 2023
                           San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      Rivka Steinberg appeals the district court’s order granting Icelandic

Provisions’ motion to dismiss her complaint for failure to state a claim. We have

jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

      Steinberg’s complaint fails to allege that the product’s front label would

deceive a reasonable consumer to believe that the product is manufactured in

Iceland, because the front label’s “ambiguity [is] resolved by reference to the back

label,” which accurately states that the product is manufactured in New York.

McGinity v. Procter & Gamble Co., No. 22-15080, – F.4th – (9th Cir. 2023).

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2