Court Opinion

ID: 4368855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-19 14:33:15.760225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:40.689821
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-579.]

          CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. MARIOTTI.
      [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, ___ Ohio St.3d ___,
                                     2019-Ohio-579.]
  (No. 2018-1579—Submitted February 14, 2019—Decided February 19, 2019.)
                          ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a
motion to reinstate law license by respondent, Mark Mariotti. The request was
not opposed.
        {¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the request
is granted and that respondent, Mark Mariotti, Attorney Registration No.
0067608, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, is reinstated to the
practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of
respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against him.
        {¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
        {¶ 4} For earlier case, see Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Mariotti, __ Ohio
St.3d __, 2018-Ohio-4769, __ N.E.3d __.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,
and STEWART, JJ., concur.
                             ________________________

                                              1