Court Opinion

ID: 9956901
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-03 14:02:02.057324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:58.194227
License: Public Domain

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 220
                 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
                                        DIVISION II
                                       No. CR-23-577

                                                    Opinion Delivered April 3, 2024

 DONNIE RAYMOND PARTAIN      APPEAL FROM THE YELL
                   APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
                             NORTHERN DISTRICT
 V.                          [NO. 75NCR-17-96]

 STATE OF ARKANSAS                            HONORABLE JERRY DON
                                     APPELLEE RAMEY, JUDGE

                                                    AFFIRMED

                        BRANDON J. HARRISON, Chief Judge

       The Yell County Circuit Court revoked Donnie Raymond Partain’s probation, and

he has appealed that decision, arguing that the circuit court erred in finding that he had

inexcusably violated the terms and conditions of his probation. We affirm the revocation.

       In January 2018, Partain pled guilty to failing to register as a sex offender and received

a sentence of five years’ probation. The conditions of his probation included requirements

that he not commit a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment; not drink or possess

intoxicating or alcoholic beverages; not use, sell, distribute, or possess any controlled

substance; report as directed to his supervising officer; participate in any community-based

programs (such as NA or AA) deemed necessary by his supervising officer; report to a day

reporting center and subject himself to the programs provided therein as deemed necessary

by his supervising officer; and pay all fines and fees at a rate of $50 a month.

                                               1
       In November 2022, the State moved to revoke Partain’s probation and alleged that

he had violated the terms and conditions of his probation by (1) failing to report as directed

on 4 October 2022, (2) testing positive for methamphetamines on 23 September 2022, and

(3) failing to report to his substance abuse class on 30 September 2022. The petition also

described Partain as “a public safety hazard due to his continued disregard for his conditions

of probation and his continued usage of illegal controlled substances.”

       The circuit court convened a revocation hearing on 9 February 2023. Officer Scott

Mercer, Partain’s probation officer, testified that in 2022, Partain testified positive for

methamphetamine and amphetamine on April 18, May 11, June 24, July 8, August 12, and

September 2. On May 24, he tested positive for methamphetamines. Partain reported to

Mercer on September 23 and admitted using drugs.

       Partain also failed to report as directed on May 2, May 20, May 31, June 9, July 29,

and October 4. Mercer did not recall Partain’s calling in or providing any explanation for

these missed appointments.

       On cross-examination, Mercer explained that on April 18, Partain had stated he

would test positive for marijuana, but he tested positive for only methamphetamine and

amphetamine. Between April and September 2022, Partain did not admit drug use and

often acted “confused as to why he was there.” Partain later began to admit that he was

using drugs instead of taking the drug test. Mercer also said that Partain had called in “once

or twice” about missing appointments and usually gave the excuse of no transportation.

“Slept in” was also offered as an excuse at one time. Since the petition to revoke had been

filed, Partain had been reporting and testing negative for illegal substances.

                                               2
       After the State rested, and the defense rested without presenting any evidence, the

court found that the State had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Partain had

willfully violated the conditions of his probationary sentence. Specifically, the court found

that he had violated his conditions by testing positive for a controlled substance and by not

reporting as directed. The court imposed a sentence of eight years’ imprisonment. Partain

has timely appealed from the court’s order.

       In order to revoke probation, the circuit court must find by a preponderance of the

evidence that the defendant has inexcusably violated a condition of the probation. Ark.

Code Ann. § 16-93-308(d) (Supp. 2023). To sustain a revocation, the State need only show

that the defendant committed one violation. Prackett v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 394. We will

not reverse a circuit court’s finding on appeal unless it is clearly against the preponderance

of the evidence. Id. Because the preponderance of the evidence turns on questions of

credibility and weight to be given testimony, we defer to the superior position of the circuit

court to decide these matters. King v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 278, 549 S.W.3d 407.

       Partain generally argues that the State failed to prove that his violations were willful

or inexcusable or that he had not made a good-faith effort to comply with the conditions

of his probation. Partain alleges inconsistencies in Mercer’s testimony and claims that this

calls into question the validity of the officer’s testimony. He also asserts that Mercer could

have ordered him to participate in a substance-abuse program or imposed other sanctions,

but instead, Mercer allowed him to continue to “flounder in his dependence on controlled

substances.” Partain also adds that his sentence of eight years’ imprisonment is “harsh” and

“disproportionate” to the nature of the offenses.

                                              3
       Once the State introduces evidence of noncompliance, the defendant bears the

burden of presenting a reasonable excuse for violating the conditions of probation. Scroggins

v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 346, 582 S.W.3d 853. Whether a good-faith effort has been made

to fulfill a condition of a probationary sentence is a question of fact to be determined by the

circuit court. Ramsey v. State, 60 Ark. App. 206, 959 S.W.2d 765 (1998).

       Here, the State presented evidence that Partain tested positive for drugs and failed to

report on multiple occasions. Partain did not respond with any evidence of a reasonable

excuse for these violations. He suggests that his status as a drug addict and his lack of access

to transportation provided a reasonable excuse for noncompliance, but that was a factual

question for the circuit court to decide. Ramsey, supra. As to any inconsistencies in the

testimony, it is within the purview of the circuit court to decide questions of credibility.

King, supra. Finally, if a court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court may enter a

judgment of conviction and may impose any sentence on the defendant that might have

been imposed originally for the offense. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-93-308(g)(1)(A) (Supp.

2021). Partain’s sentence of eight years’ imprisonment is well within the sentencing range

for failing to register as a sex offender, a Class C felony. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401(a)(4)

(Supp. 2021) (sentence for a Class C felony shall be not less than three years nor more than

ten years).

       Affirmed.

       GLADWIN and THYER, JJ., agree.

       Lynmarie S. Liberty-Ellington, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

       Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: A. Evangeline Bacon, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

                                               4