Court Opinion

ID: 9681756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:56:07.053499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:35.740352
License: Public Domain

HALE, Justice
(concurring).
I concur in the reversal and rendition of the judgment, as indicated in the opinion written by Justice TIREY. However, I do not think it is necessary to determine on this appeal whether the 635 acres covered in the “pooling agreement”, or the 230 acres owned by Julius Reinert and wife, was or was not sufficiently described to render the instrument valid as a conveyance of an estate in all or any part of the lands therein referred to, because it appears to me that under the undisputed evidence in this case the owners of the three tracts of land are conclusively estopped inter sese from denying the' validity or the binding force and effect of the instrument as a proper basis for correctly dividing the funds tendered into the registry of the court below by Lone Star Gas Company through its bill of interpleader.