Court Opinion

ID: 6060539
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 15:59:08.547678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:52.542070
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed January 3, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Armstrong, 127 AD3d 1100, 1101 [2015]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.