Court Opinion

ID: 6789377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 01:08:17.903847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:01.123047
License: Public Domain

Pfeifer, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 3} I would reverse the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate the decision of the trial court. I would base my decision on R.C. 2317.02, which governs privileged communications, not on Hearn v. Rhay (E.D.Wash.1975), 68 F.R.D. 574. I dissent.
Lynch & White and Richard S. Lynch, urging reversal for amicus curiae Richard S. Lynch.
Buckingham, Lucal, McGookey & Zeiher Co., L.P.A., and John R. Ball, urging reversal for amicus curiae John R. Ball.