Court Opinion

ID: 2167787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:00.892885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:43.421415
License: Public Domain

290 S.W.3d 813 (2009)
David E. WHISTANCE, Appellant,
v.
Cary Lyn Diekmann FLICK, Respondent.
No. WD 69522.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 28, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 1, 2009.
Jeffrey S. Eastman, for Appellant.
Christopher F. Arbuckle, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

*814 ORDER

PER CURIAM:
David and Nancy Whistance appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of Cary Diekmann and against the Whistances on their suit for breach of a real estate contract. On appeal, the Whistances claim that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence and is against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).