Court Opinion

ID: 5881905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:19:37.153344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:02.177759
License: Public Domain

Judg*316ment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing officer properly complied with 7 NYCRR 254.5 (b) in determining that petitioner’s witnesses should testify out of his presence (see, People ex rel. Bradley v Smith, 115 AD2d 225). Special Term properly found no violation of 7 NYCRR 254.7 (c). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Flynn, J. —habeas corpus.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.