Court Opinion

ID: 8681172
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:13:06.12021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.474077
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Montiel-Ramirez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montiel-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Montiel-Ra-mirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5½ Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.