Court Opinion

ID: 9484385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 09:51:59.279789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:13.154444
License: Public Domain

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the judgment of the majority because Jamison was, in -fact, an accessory after the fact whether he perjured himself to aid Simmons or .to safeguard himself and his family. I write separately, however, in order to indicate that I do not find that the district court’s determination that Jamison lied in an effort to protect himself was clearly erroneous. Since my reading of § 2X3.1 would not require that we address the question of why Jamison perjured himself, I do not believe it necessary for us to reverse that factual finding of the district court.