Court Opinion

ID: 7076312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 08:16:26.657376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:47.024562
License: Public Domain

ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA
On April 28, 2006, this Court ordered the respondent, John S. Hosinski, to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to respond to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against him. 'The order required that the respondent show cause in writing within 10 days of service of the order. On July 18, 2006, the Commission moved this Court to impose costs against the respondent, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10){)(5), in the amount of $514.64. On August 10, 2006, respondent moved for an extension of time to respond, to which the Commission objected on August 16, 2006.
The Court finds that the respondent has not submitted a response to the Order to Show Cause dated April 28, 2006, and that his request for an extension sets forth insufficient basis for an extension of time. Accordingly, the Court further finds that the respondent's request for an extension of time should be denied and that he should be suspended immediately from the practice of law in Indiana pursuant to Ad-mis.Disce.R. 23(10)(f), and costs assessed against the respondent in the amount of $514.64.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that respondent's request for an extension of time to respond is DENIED and that respondent, John S. Hosinski, is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately. Pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(f)(4), the suspension shall continue until: 1) the Executive Secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that he has cooperated with the investigation; 2) the investigation or any related disciplinary proceedings that may arise from the investigation is concluded; or 3) until further order of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent, John S. Hosinski, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)({)(5), is to reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $514.64 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this order to the respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested, at his address as reflected in the Roll of Attorneys. The Clerk of this Court is further directed to issue notice of this order to the Disciplinary Commission.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to give notice of this action pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc.R. 28(8)(d) and to provide to the Clerk of the United States Court of Ap-péals for the Seventh Cireuit, to the clerks of each of the United States District Courts and United States Bankruptcy Courts in this state, the respondent's last known address as reflected in the records of the Clerk of this Court, and to post this Order on the Court's website for orders concerning final resolution of attorney disciplinary cases.
All Justices concur.