Court Opinion

ID: 3101412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:12:30.792264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:04.346189
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued July 24, 2014

                                     In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                            ————————————
                               NO. 01-14-00500-CR
                           ———————————
              EX PARTE NELSON OKWOLISA ILODIGUWE

                   On Appeal from the 248th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 1361714

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On March 14, 2014, appellant Nelson Okwolisa Ilodiguwe was convicted of

the felony charge of sexual assault and sentenced to 4 years’ imprisonment.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal of his conviction on the same day. On April 13,

2014, appellant filed a motion requesting that the trial court set bail pending his
appeal pursuant to Article 44.04(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1 On

April 29, 2014, the trial court entered an order denying the motion to set bail

pending appeal. On June 16, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal regarding the

trial court’s denial of bail pending appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31 (providing for

appellate review of orders in bail proceedings).

       Article 44.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure allows a convicted

defendant to seek reasonable bail pending appeal under certain conditions. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.04(b), (c) (West 2006). The statute also

provides for a separate, preferential appeal of the trial court’s action in denying or

setting a bond pending appeal. See id. art. 44.04(g); Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930,

932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet); Delangel v. State, 132 S.W.3d 491, 494

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). Such an appeal is separate from

the appeal that the accused takes from the judgment of conviction and must be

perfected by a separate notice of appeal. See Ortiz, 299 S.W.3d at 933; McLain v.

State, 269 S.W.3d 191, 194 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, no pet.); Delangel, 132
S.W.3d at 494.

       Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a)(1), a notice of appeal must

be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or
1
    Article 44.04(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure allows release on bail
    pending appeal for a felony conviction when punishment does not equal or exceed ten
    years of confinement so long as the defendant has not been convicted of an offense
    listed under section 3g(a)(1) of Article 42.12. See TEX. CODE. CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.
    44.04(b) (West 2006).
                                           2
after the trial court enters an appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The

appellant may obtain an extension by filing both the notice of appeal and a motion

for extension of time within fifteen days after the deadline passes. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.3. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals interprets Rule 26.3 strictly to

require an appellant in a criminal case to file the notice of appeal and a motion for

extension within the 15–day period for filing a late notice of appeal. See Olivo v.

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–26 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellant has not filed a

motion for extension of time in this case.

      Here, the trial court entered an order on April 29, 2014 denying appellant’s

request to set bail. Appellant’s notice of appeal was therefore due on May 29,

2014. See TEX R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June

16, 2014—18 days after the deadline. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not

timely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208,

210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d 522-23.

      Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                             3