Court Opinion

ID: 9381236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-22 15:03:47.714774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:31.015100
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed March 22, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1431
                       Lower Tribunal No. 15-14107
                          ________________

                 Monica Gascon and Alexis Schloeter,
                            Appellants,

                                     vs.

       The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., etc.,
                             Appellee.

      An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio
Arzola, Judge.

      Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for
appellants.

     Wargo, French & Singer, LLP, and Anthony R. Yanez, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and MILLER, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank, 143 So. 3d 489, 490 n.1

(Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (affirming final summary judgment in favor of the bank

because the mortgage’s notice provision required only that the bank mail or

deliver the default letter to the borrower’s notice address, not that the

borrower receive it); Bank of America v. Nash, 200 So. 3d 131, 135 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2016) (“The fact that the [default] letter may not have been received is

irrelevant.”).

                                     2