Court Opinion

ID: 9709491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 03:48:51.700552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:49.350374
License: Public Domain

BAKER, Judge,
concurring.
While I concur in the result reached by the majority, I cannot join in its observation that under the facts of this case, *1333where Paul’s employer would reward earlier retirement, it would then be difficult to perceive why Paul would hesitate to retire from his present employment at age 55. At 1332. There are a myriad of reasons why Paul might choose to enjoy productive employment beyond age 55. The values for Paul’s pension were within the evidence and his suggestion that the trial court erred in determining a value is only an invitation for us to reweigh the evidence which we must decline.