Court Opinion

ID: 3168043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-07 22:01:02.71773+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:23.703675
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM
  
   **
  

  David and Kelly Toneman appeal from the judgment dismissing their Second Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Tonemans challenge the district court’s dismissal of their claims for wrongful foreclosure, slander of title, negligence, fraud, and unfair business practices on various grounds. We affirm dismissal of these claims for the reasons stated in the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   **
  

   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.