Court Opinion

ID: 3093591
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:16:26.912801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:04.792540
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-12-00456-CV
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                       
                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       
                                  AT AMARILLO
                                       
                                    PANEL B
                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEBRUARY 21, 2013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                         JORDAN A. SEIBERT, APPELLANT
                                       
                                      v.
                                       
      THE SCOOTER STORE, LTD: JACKIE WALSH AND MICHELLE WALSH, APPELLEES 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                 FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY;
                                       
                 NO. C2011-0172A; HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                       
	On February 13, 2013, the parties to this appeal filed a joint motion to set aside judgment and remand on the basis that the parties have reached a settlement agreement on all matters in controversy.  Because this motion complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the trial court's May 14, 2012, and July 10, 2012 summary judgment orders are set aside, without consideration of the merits, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).  The motion further indicates that the parties agree to bear their own costs incurred by this appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  Because the motion is jointly filed by each of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Mackey K. Hancock
						          Justice