Court Opinion

ID: 3842369
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:11:40.479214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:14:25.634453
License: Public Domain

DECISION OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.
A case management conference was scheduled at 10:00 a. m. on June 9, 2011, to consider Plaintiff's appeal. On May 10, 2011, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiff's representative, Stephen Lakowske (Lakowske) at stevel95@comcast.net, which is the email address provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Lakowske did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.
On June 9, 2011, the court sent Lakowske a letter at the mailing address provided to the court. The letter explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by June 23, 2011, for its failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining its failure to *Page 2 
appear at the June 9, 2011, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.
Dated this ____ day of July 2011.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to:Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.
Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged.
This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinsonon July 6, 2011. The Court filed and entered this documenton July 6, 2011.
 *Page 1