Court Opinion

ID: 9579134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:51:50.67377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:27.698087
License: Public Domain

Kelly, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in the decision and opinion with one exception. I dissent to that portion of the opinion which would reverse the conviction of defendant Schendel. The defendant’s proved attempt to prevent a police officer from arresting a participant in the disorder is evidence that she participated in the unlawful assembly. True, her conduct could support a charge of violating Minn. St. 609.50, obstructing a police officer in the performance of his duty, but I cannot concede that there was no evidence to support the charge upon which she was convicted.