Court Opinion

ID: 9832576
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:00:57.699364+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:48.297940
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[4] This is a boundary suit, and La Salle county was made a party on its warranty. There is no question as to the title of La Salle county to the land described' in its patents. That is the land, and no other, which was sold by La Salle county. No survey was made, and no particular land was pointed out to the purchasers. Whether it shall be determined that the La Salle county school lands are located to the west and south, as contended by appellees, or to the north and east, as contended by appellants, is immaterial so far as La Salle county is concerned, as in either event its gran-' tees will get the land described in their deeds; such description being the same as in the patents. As in no event could any judgment be rendered against La Salle county on its warranty, the motion of said c.ounty for a rehearing is granted, and the judgment of the trial court in its favor is affirmed.
Motion granted.