Court Opinion

ID: 9861641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 00:15:30.465136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:28:45.341666
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion
DeBruler, J.
It is my understanding in concurring with the majority on the issue of the admissibility of Exhibit 14, being the written report of the objective findings of deputy coroner Esparza, that Dr. Esparza was dead at the time of trial and therefore unavailable as a witness, and that the issue is not presented in this case and the Court does not hold that the public document exception to the hearsay rule as it is formulated and applied in the majority opinion, conforms to the requirements of the state and federal constitu*190tional provisions guaranteeing the right of one accused of crime to confront the witnesses against him.
Note. — Reported at 361 N.E.2d 902.