Court Opinion

ID: 681917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:39:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.945435
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1177
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Ervin C. MADDREY, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Marie NEWELL, Former Librarian, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-6617.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 26, 1994Decided:  October 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-301)
Ervin C. Maddrey, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Maddrey v. Newell, No. CA-93-301 (E.D. Va.  May 10, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED