Court Opinion

ID: 9961778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-19 18:06:37.761916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:52.186148
License: Public Domain

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

                           STATE OF LOUISIANA

                             COURT OF APPEAL

                              FIRST CIRCUIT

                               2023 CW 1112

         PATRICK WELLS, BETHANY WELLS, AND KELVIN WELLS

                                  VERSUS

               MENTORSHIP STEAM ACADEMY AS PART OF
                  HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND ITS
           INSURER, PRESTON CASTILLE, DONALD JOHNSON,
                    ADONIS REED, CHRISTINE HENRY

                                              Judgment Rendered:    APR 19 2024

           On Appeal from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court
                In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge
                              State of Louisiana
                              Docket No. 719275

               Honorable Ronald R. Johnson, Judge Presiding

Kelvin Wells                              Plaintiff/Appellant
St. Gabriel, Louisiana                    Pro Se

Gregory Engelsman                         Counsel for Defendants/ Appellees
Baton Rouge, Louisiana                    Mentorship Steam Academy as part
and-                                      of Helix Community School, Preston
Charles G. Clayton, IV                    Castille, Donald Johnson, Adonis Reed,
Madisonville, Louisiana                   and Christine Henry

         BEFORE:         McCLENDON, NESTER, AND MILLER, 33.
McCLENDON, J.

       The plaintiff appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for a default

judgment.       For the following reasons, we convert the appeal to an application for

supervisory writs and deny the writ.

        Kelvin Wells filed a Petition for Damages on May 20, 2022, naming as defendants,

Mentorship Steam Academy as part of Helix Community Schools and its Insurer, Preston

Castille,   Donald Johnson, Adonis Reed, and Christine Henry.                   On June 22, 2022, the

defendants filed a Motion and Order to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleadings.                         On

June 23, 2022, the trial court granted the motion, giving an additional thirty days from

the date of the signing of the order within which to file any exceptions, responsive

pleadings, or answer.'       On July 22, 2022, one day prior to the deadline, the defendants

filed Exceptions of Improper Service, Vagueness, No Cause of Action and No Right of

Action. 2

        On July 25, 2022, Mr. Wells filed a Motion for Default Judgment.                    On October 6,

2022, the trial court denied Mr. Wells' motion for a default judgment,                          noting the

 Exceptions filed by Defendant on 7/ 22/ 22 & 9/ 6/ 22." Mr. Wells filed a Notice of Appeal

on October 13, 2022, and the trial court granted the appeal on November 7, 2022.

        As an appellate court, we have the duty to examine our subject matter jurisdiction

and to determine sua sponte whether such subject matter jurisdiction exists, even when

the issue is not raised by the litigants. This court's appellate jurisdiction only extends to

 final judgments."'    Gulfco of Louisiana., LLC v. Plaisance, 2022- 0166 ( La -App. 1 Cir.

3/ 8/ 23), 362 So. 3d 660, 662.

1 Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1001 provides the delay for answering as follows:

        A. A defendant shall file his answer within twenty- one days after service of citation upon
        him, except as otherwise provided by law. If the plaintiff files and serves a discovery
        request with his petition, the defendant shall file his answer to the petition within thirty
        days after service of citation and service of discovery request.
        B. When an exception is filed prior to answer and is overruled or referred to the merits, or
        is sustained and an amendment of the petition ordered, the answer shall be filed within
        fifteen days after the exception is overruled or referred to the merits, or fifteen days after
        service of the amended petition.

        C. The court may grant additional time for answering.

z Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1002 provides: " Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1001,
the defendant may file his answer or other pleading at any time prior to the signing of a default judgment
against him."

                                                      E
         Only final judgments and interlocutory judgments expressly provided by law are

appealable.    LSA- C. C. P. art. 2083. A judgment that determines the merits in whole or in

part is a final judgment. ISA- C. C. P. art. 1841. A judgment that denies a default judgment

does not determine the merits and is therefore, interlocutory. See Gulfco of Louisiana,

LLC, 362 So. 3d at 662; Jackson v. Usey, 2020-402 ( La. App. 5 Cir. 2/ 10/ 21), 315 So. 3d

377, 378.

         Based on the foregoing, we find the judgment Mr. Wells seeks to appeal is an

interlocutory ruling and not a final judgment.3 The proper procedural vehicle to contest

an interlocutory judgment is by application for supervisory writs filed within thirty days of

the interlocutory judgment.          See LSA- C. C. P.    art.   2201;   Myers v. Diaz, 2022- 0445

La. App. 1 Cir. 11/ 4/ 22), 354 So. 3d 78, 81. This court has discretion to convert an appeal

to an application for supervisory writs, and may do sowhen the motion for appeal was

filed within the thirty -day time period allowed for the filing of a supervisory writ

application.   Succession of Saucier, 2021- 1466 ( La.App.                 1 Cir. 6/ 29/ 22), 344 So. 3d

108, 114.   In the interest of judicial efficiency and considering that Mr. Wells' appeal was

filed within the delay for filing a supervisory writ application, we exercise our discretion

to convert this appeal to an application for supervisory writs, and consider the merits of

the appeal under our supervisory jurisdiction. See Perdido Energy Louisiana, LLC v.

Acadia     Parish Board of Review, 2020- 0962 ( La. App.                   1 Cir. 3/ 30/ 21),   2021 WL

1207818, * 2 ( unpublished).

         When Mr. Wells filed his motion for default, the defendants' exceptions filed on

July 22, 2022 were pending, and the delays for answering the petition had not expired.
See LSA- C. C. P. art. 1001( B).     Accordingly, we find no error by the trial court in denying

Mr. Wells' motion for a default judgment, and we deny the writ application.

         For these reasons, we convert this appeal to an application for supervisory writs

and deny the writ application. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiff, Kelvin

Wells.

    APPEAL CONVERTED TO APPLICATION                                 FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS;
WRIT APPLICATION DENIED.

3 we note that on December 11, 2023, this court issued a Rule to Show Cause order, requesting that the
parties file briefs as to whether this appeal should or should not be dismissed.

                                                     3