Court Opinion

ID: 1002567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:12:43.859617+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:14.499626
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6730

WILLIAM R. SMITH,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,
Attorney General,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.   David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-00-922-3-18)

Submitted:   September 8, 2000         Decided:   September 18, 2000

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William R. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and Smith’s motion for judicial notice

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.   See

Smith v. Johnson, No. CA-00-922-3-18 (D.S.C. May 5, 2000).        We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2