Court Opinion

ID: 8439344
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:20:53.41388+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.069846
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Richard Donnell Briscoe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Briscoe, No. 8:04-cr-00559-AW-l (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.