Court Opinion

ID: 2871193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 03:56:30.407044+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:34.033543
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-05-00554-CR

                                    Kenneth King, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
           NO. 3013128, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               In July 2002, appellant Kenneth King was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after he pleaded guilty to attempted burglary of a habitation. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.

§§ 15.01, 30.02 (West 2003). Three years later, following a hearing on the State’s motion, the trial

court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment.

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

               We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

               The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

                                              __________________________________________

                                              W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: August 11, 2006

Do Not Publish

                                                 2