Court Opinion

ID: 615100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-10-11 15:55:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:00.505985
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 United States Court of Appeals
     for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

           SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,
       Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

                          and

EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and
          EPSON AMERICA, INC.,
           Counterclaim Defendants,

                            v.

           CORETRONIC CORPORATION,
          Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,

                          and

           OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
               Defendant-Appellee.

                 ______________________

                       2011-1120
                 ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946,
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel.
                    ______________________

                         JUDGMENT
                    ______________________

    EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim
defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees.
With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W.
O’MEARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN.

   STEVEN D. HEMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo
Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-
appellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief
were YITAI HU and ELIZABETH H. RADER.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

    PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges).

            AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                        ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 11, 2011        /s/ Jan Horbaly
      Date                   Jan Horbaly
                                Clerk