Court Opinion

ID: 4533430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-05-12 00:00:22.057461+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:04.350994
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-40972      Document: 00515411565        Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/11/2020

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 19-40972                            May 11, 2020
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

HECTOR MIRELES-MORALES,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 7:19-CR-1298-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Mireles-

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40972    Document: 00515411565     Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/11/2020

                                 No. 19-40972

Morales has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Mireles-Morales has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and relevant portions of the record.

      We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-
frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2