Court Opinion

ID: 6937261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:41:39.501187+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:32.549117
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of three counts of harassment. ORS 166.065. The trial court imposed a county jail sentence, suspended execution of the sentence and placed defendant on probation for three years. As a condition of probation, he was ordered to pay restitution to a police officer who was injured when defendant was arrested, to the county and to a private insurance company. Defendant appeals, assigning as error the imposition of that condition. We affirm the convictions but remand to the trial court for reconsideration of the restitution order.
The restitution that defendant was ordered to pay is $4,000 to a private insurance carrier for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits paid to the officer. The record does not indicate whether an assignment of the officer’s claim against the defendant has occurred. Therefore, this case is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the carrier is a “victim” within the context of ORS 137.106.1 See ORS 656.578; ORS 656.783; State v. Craig, 51 Or App 357, 625 P2d 684 (1981); State v. Divers, 51 Or App 351, 625 P2d 681 (1981).
Convictions affirmed; remanded for reconsideration of restitution.

 ORS 137.106 provides that the court may order restitution to a “victim” as defined by ORS 137.103(4). A “victim” is a party or entity who would be entitled to recover civil damages from the defendant. See ORS 137.103(2); State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 179-80, 637 P2d 602 (1981).