Court Opinion

ID: 8465189
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:56:20.171675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.753841
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Osborne, No. 3:98-cr-00322-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.