Court Opinion

ID: 6067603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:43:49.328747+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:46.081397
License: Public Domain

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered June 28, 2000, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint without prejudice to renewal following the conduct of further discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was properly denied in light of the affidavit of plaintiffs expert, which raised material issues of fact *328as to whether defendant created the stairway defect alleged by plaintiff to have caused his injury. The evidence submitted on the motion indicates that, although the subject building was constructed prior to the enactment of the Building Code, subsequent alterations and repairs of the building, including the reconstruction of the staircase at issue, brought the building within the Code’s coverage (cf., Lester v Waterman, 242 AD2d 683), and “[o]rdinarily, the opinion of a qualified expert that a plaintiffs injuries were caused by a deviation from relevant industry standards would preclude a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants” (see, Murphy v Conner, 84 NY2d 969, 972). Concur — Tom, J. P., Andrias, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.