Court Opinion

ID: 7490902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:09:49.227896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:34.028039
License: Public Domain

The appellant in brief, in support of her application for rehearing, points out that this court, in its original opinion, stated that "less than $1000 remained to be paid." Appellant further points out that, in fact, approximately $1,500 remained to be paid.
In appellant's original brief, the following is found, ". . . the stipulated facts showed that only $17,282.17 of the original $18,000.00 judgment had been paid . . ." The above resulted in our conclusion that less than $1,000 remained to be paid. However, contrary to appellant's original statement to this court, our search of the record now reveals that, in fact, approximately $1,500 remained to be paid. Our original opinion is so amended to reflect this slight, somewhat irrelevant error.
OPINION EXTENDED. APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.
WRIGHT, P.J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.