Court Opinion

ID: 5641042
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 06:17:33.248515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:11.769149
License: Public Domain

Benham, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, multiple burglaries, entering an auto, and criminal damage to property and sentenced to serve three years in confinement and the balance of each sentence on probation. This appeal is from the revocation of that probation. The attorney appointed to represent appellant in the probation revocation proceeding filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize the revocation of appellant’s probation. McBee v. State, 158 Ga. App. 662 (282 SE2d 224) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.