Court Opinion

ID: 662739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:19:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:50.554593
License: Public Domain

16 F.3d 410NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Carl F. MOORE, Petitioner Appellant,v.J.T. HARDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.Carl F. MOORE, Petitioner Appellant,v.J.T. HADDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.
Nos. 93-6865, 93-7064.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.Decided Feb. 4, 1994.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-469-HC-F).
Carl F. Moore, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition, and denying his Motion for Reconsideration and For a Direct Order for Jail Time Credit.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Moore v. Hadden, No. CA-93-469-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 1993 & Sept. 17, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.