Court Opinion

ID: 7515910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:46:38.170419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:28.717275
License: Public Domain

DAUKSCH, C. J.,
dissents with opinion.
I respectfully dissent.
In my opinion there is a genuine issue of fact as to whether James Lee knew, or under the circumstances should have known, that the property in question was partnership property. As the law requires, I have resolved all doubts and inferences in favor of the non-movant and am left convinced this case should not have been decided by summary judgment. I would reverse the summary judgment and have the case returned for trial. In that event, all the facts could be brought before a jury to determine the matter after resolving the conflicts in the evidence.