Court Opinion

ID: 1004058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:03.560574+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:30.674082
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-7592

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIE SWANN,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-90-166-K, CA-00-3132-JFM)

Submitted:   April 6, 2001                 Decided:   April 20, 2001

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Swann, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Willie Swann seeks to appeal the district court’s orders deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000),

and his motion to dismiss the indictment.    We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

United States v. Swann, Nos. CR-90-166-K; CA-00-3132-JFM (D. Md.

Oct. 25, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2