Court Opinion

ID: 6152233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 16:04:28.462714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:05.023476
License: Public Domain

Wingate, S.
The paper propounded as a will consists of a hospital chart with the decedent’s record of temperature, pulse and respiration from his entry into the hospital until it was used to write upon as hereinafter described. Across the top of the paper are written, in pencil, names, amounts and addresses, in the handwriting of decedent’s sister, and below is a pencil scrawl said to be written by the deceased, which is undecipherable by the surrogate.
Decedent was stricken on Friday with paralysis, which affected his throat and one side of his body, and was removed that night to the hospital, where, later, secondary pneumonia set in. He died the following Monday, December 4, 1922.
On Sunday afternoon, his sister testifies, she called, and taking the hospital chart wrote upon it at the dictation of the decedent the names, amounts and addresses mentioned, gave the decedent the pencil and supervised his efforts at writing that which is now offered at his will. She says she could understand what he said, and that she wrote down the names, amounts and addresses as he told her, and that when that was finished, he wrote out the alleged will.
Her interpretation of his writing was that it left all his property to her and to her sister. She further testifies that the decedent *825said, “ Sign this will,” to her and to Mrs. Steiner (Morris) and the nurse, who were also in the room, and that they signed.
Mrs. Steiner (Morris), who claims to be decedent’s wife and who would get nothing if the will were admitted to probate, testifies that she saw the occurrence and saw the pencil drop out of decedent’s hand, but says that the sister asked her and the nurse to sign the paper, saying it was a list of those who owed the decedent money, and she is very positive the word “ will ” was never mentioned. She further says that the man’s throat was in such condition that he could not make a sound she could understand.
The nurse, who is a disinterested party, corroborates the testimony of Mrs. Steiner (Morris) and is positive that the word “ will ” was not used, and says that she could not understand the sounds the decedent made.
The doctor who attended the decedent testifies that on the Sunday when the writing propounded as a will was done, the deceased had partial paralysis of one leg and arm and partial paralysis of his throat, which was so filled with mucous that he (the doctor) could not understand what the decedent said. He further testifies that the decedent had secondary pneumonia and that, because of his inability to understand what the patient said, he could not determine whether he was rational or delirious. He described the patient as having been in a stuporous condition on the day in question.
The petitioner has failed to sustain the burden of proof as to execution and testamentary capacity, and the will is denied probate.
Decreed accordingly.