Court Opinion

ID: 993441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:07:59.136515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:33.001028
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-2198

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BRENDA J. DAVIS,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.
(CA-97-2509-S)

Submitted:   October 23, 1997          Decided:     November 13, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Ap-

pellant's claims of extortion, libel, and slander under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Davis, No.
CA-97-2509-S (D. Md. Aug. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2