Court Opinion

ID: 994133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:18:17.420082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:43.454346
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JON ROBERT ZIMNICK,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District
Judge. (CR-92-181, CA-97-652-2)

Submitted:   January 22, 1998             Decided:   February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jon Robert Zimnick, Appellant Pro Se.     Carol M. Marx, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Zimnick, Nos. CR-92-181; CA-97-652-2 (Sept.
12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2