Court Opinion

ID: 8456911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:17:39.326417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.914304
License: Public Domain

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Danny Russell Redden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Redden v. McMaster, No. 8:08-cv-02845-CMC, 2008 WL 4458877 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.