Court Opinion

ID: 5610014
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:56:26.97228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:04.740766
License: Public Domain

Wade, C. J.'
The property levied upon was described in the mortgage fi. fa. as “one yellow mare mule 6 years old, about 15 hands high,” and the mortgage upon which this fi. fa. was based covered property described as “one yellow mare 6 year old, about 15 hand high,” but the mortgage recited, immediately following these words of description, that “it is expressly agreed that said J. N. Chrisman & Company do not warrant health, life, soundness, and work of said mule [italics *816ours], only tlie title thereto, and which the said J. A. Moree hereby mortgages to the said.J. N. Chrisman & Company, to secure the pur-, chase price aforesaid.” The mortgagor sold the mortgaged property to a person who in turn sold it to the plaintiff in error, and the latter interposed a claim to it when it was levied upon under the mortgage fi. fa. as “one yellow mare mule, . . the property of J. A. Moree, by virtue of a mortgage fi. fa.,” etc. Held, that the mortgage, when considered as a whole, indicated the existence of a contract lien upon a yellow mare mule sufficiently to place all third persons upon constructive notice thereof; and the trial judge (there being no conflict in the evidence) , did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in fi. fa., finding the property subject to the mortgage execution.
Decided September 13, 1917.
Levy and claim; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. February 13, 1917.
J. Z. Jackson, for plaintiff in error.
Hendricks, Mills & Hendricks, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

George and Luke, JJ., concur.