Court Opinion

ID: 7443061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:07:51.963299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:36.790964
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.
Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.
CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.