Court Opinion

ID: 7132615
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:20:29.79877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:31.325162
License: Public Domain

JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the opinion op the court.
In this case the plaintiff failed to appear in the court below when his case was called for trial and the action was dismissed without prejudice.
On a subsequent day of the term he appeared, and the court, on his motion, set aside the order of dismissal conditioned upon the payment of all costs by him within sixty days from the time the order was made. This the plaintiff failed to do and instituted another action for the same cause alleged in the first action. The defendant appeared in the last action and pleaded in bar the dismissal of the first action. The plea was sustained. The defense was neither good as a plea in bar or in abatement. The failure to pay the costs left the plaintiff in the condition he was before the order of dismissal was set aside. There was, in fact, no order setting aside the order dismissing the case without prejudice. The order was conditional, and to take effect upon the payment of costs, and this was never done; so the order of dismissal stands as originally made. When the defense was filed, or before, *465the clerk having failed to redocket the original case, the plaintiff' moved that he might redocket it for the purpose alone, and no other, of dismissing without prejudice. This was needless as the order of dismissal had already been made. The demurrer to the answer should have been sustained. There is a statute requiring the payment of costs within forty days when a new trial is granted upon the payment of costs, but it does not affect this case as the time was fixed by the court in which the payment was to be made.
The judgment ip reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.