Court Opinion

ID: 991020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:30:38.072556+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:34.417191
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6917

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TIMOTHY PATRICK O'CONNELL,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-6-C-P)

Submitted:   December 12, 1996         Decided:     December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Patrick O'Connell, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel-

lant's motion for return of forefeited property. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. O'Connell, No. CR-90-6-C-P (W.D.N.C. Dec.
19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2