Court Opinion

ID: 56795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:57:34+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:36.717941
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Richard John Florance, Jr., a sanctioned litigant, moves to proceed on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his civil suit and for the removal of sanctions previously imposed by this court. Florance is barred from filing any pleading in this court without the prior authorization of a judge of this court, and we have warned Florance that any filing in this court that contains inappropriate comments concerning judicial personnel or other parties will be stricken and dismissed with prejudice.
  
   See In re: Florance,
  
  No. 07-40129 (5th Cir. Jun. 5, 2007);
  
   Florance v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
  
  174 Fed.Appx. 200 (5th Cir. Mar. 29, 2006).
 

  Despite our warning, Florance has again submitted pleadings to this court containing inappropriate comments concerning judicial personnel and other parties. Accordingly, Florance’s motions to proceed as a sanctioned litigant and to remove the sanctions previously imposed by this court are DENIED. Florance’s appeal is STRICKEN from the record and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Florance is warned that future inappropriate filings may result in monetary sanctions. Ml other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.