Court Opinion

ID: 5700085
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:39:15.681829+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:19.062276
License: Public Domain

*317Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Ambrecht, J., at hearing; Daniel E FitzGerald, J., at plea and sentence) rendered October 16, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The police had reasonable suspicion to pursue defendant based upon his sudden, unprovoked flight from a lawfully stopped vehicle, shortly after the driver, upon the approach of the police, had made a suspicious gesture in defendant’s direction strongly indicating an effort to secrete something (see e.g. People v Rivera, 286 AD2d 235 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 760 [2002]). Prior to the flight, the police had a founded suspicion of criminality that warranted a common-law inquiry of defendant (see e.g. People v Williams, 300 AD2d 684, 685 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 654 [2003]), whose flight elevated the officers’ level of suspicion to the point where they were justified in pursuing him. The record also supports the court’s alternative finding that defendant’s independent act of discarding the cocaine during the foot chase was a strategic, calculated decision and not a spontaneous reaction to the police activity (see People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, 402 [1979], cert denied 444 US 969 [1979]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.