Court Opinion

ID: 279096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:43:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:12.882688
License: Public Domain

390 F.2d 650
Thuman Eugene STANPHILL, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21778.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1968.

Willys I. Peck (argued), of McNamee, Peck, Neil & Melino, Los Gatos, Cal., for appellant.
Michael L. Morehouse, Asst. U.S. Atty.  (argued), Sidney Lezak, U.S. Atty., Richard C. Helegson, Mallory C. Walker, Asst. U.S. Attys., Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District judge.
PER CURIAM.

1
There appears to have been a rational basis in fact for the classification given Stanphill in the administrative process which denied him a ministerial exemption from the draft.

2
Therefore, the conviction is affirmed.