Court Opinion

ID: 5440142
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 18:01:09.645055+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:58.876963
License: Public Domain

Myrick, J.:
The defendant executed to one Sbarboro a mortgage, as recited therein, “to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500 indebtedness.” The mortgage is dated August 15th, 1876. On the 16th of November, 1876, Sbarboro transferred the mortgage to one Mitchell, as security for the sum of $2,500 loaned to him by Mitchell. Mitchell has since died, and plaintiff is his executor. No note accompanied the mortgage. The Court below found that the mortgage, according to its terms, was due and payable August 16th, 1876, and that plaintiff’s testator received it after maturity, and subject to all equities existing between the parties thereto; that there was no debt due said Sbarboro by defendant at the time of the giving, of the mortgage; that there was no consideration for the mortgage, and that the same was not negotiable; that defendant had not been guilty of any fraud or negligence to plaintiff’s detriment, and that plaintiff acquired nothing by the purchase of the mortgage, as against defendant. Thereupon the Court rendered judgment for the defendant.
The findings were sustained by the evidence: and we think that the conclusions of the Court upon the facts found were correct.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Morrison, C. J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.