Court Opinion

ID: 1009283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:53:39.158147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:02.949832
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7048

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROY L. STOUDEMIRE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-00-191, CA-02-1978-8)

Submitted:   December 16, 2002         Decided:     December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy L. Stoudemire, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Roy L. Stoudemire seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Stoudemire has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States

v. Stoudemire, Nos. CR-00-191; CA-02-1978-8 (D.S.C. June 11, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2