Court Opinion

ID: 9800962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 08:44:07.541238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:49:41.657233
License: Public Domain

QUINCE, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the plain language of subsection *1172921.0026(2)(d), does not require a defendant to prove that the required specialized treatment is unavailable in the Department of Corrections. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s decision to remand the case back to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing because there is competent, substantial evidence that the defendant has satisfied all that is necessary under subsection 921.0026(2)(d).
PARIENTE, J., concurs.