Court Opinion

ID: 992307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:50:06.387151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:51.090965
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7725

TERRY O'CONNOR PAGE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

EDWARD MURRAY, Director,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-94-12)

Submitted:   May 29, 1997                   Decided:   June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry O'Connor Page, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant
Attorney General, Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel-

lant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on

the reasoning of the district court. Page v. Murray, No. CA-94-12
(E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2