Court Opinion

ID: 3625991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 00:06:34.710238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:47.951596
License: Public Domain

The petition filed for the independent nomination of petitioner was filed within the time allowed by law. Thereafter it was discovered that the authentications were defective because the authenticating witnesses failed to state that they were duly qualified voters at the last election and set forth the places from which they voted, as required by the amendment of section 135 of the Election Law (Cons. Law, ch. 17) enacted in 1935 (Ch. 955, § 6). Before the expiration of the time fixed by law for the filing of petitions for independent nominations the authenticating witnesses filed with the Board of Elections new affidavits, correct in form and which complied with section 135 as amended. We have reached the conclusion that the Special Term was justified in deciding that the filing of the new affidavits corrected the error, and that the petitions and new affidavits should be treated as re-filed. Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen
(268 N.Y. 620, decided on September 9, 1935) is not in conflict, as in that case the affidavits were not corrected.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, without costs.
CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur; CROUCH, J., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly. *Page 484