Court Opinion

ID: 594048
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:49.663848
License: Public Domain

978 F.2d 1255
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James Thomas HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Dr. ROSTAFINSKY;  Virginia Department of Corrections,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6939.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  October 26, 1992Decided:  November 13, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge.  (CA-92-42)
James Thomas Holley, Appellant Pro Se.
Brewster Stone Rawls, William Rittenhouse Culbreth, Rilee, Cantor & Russell, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
Affirmed.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
James Thomas Holley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Holley v. Rostafinsky, No. CA-92-42 (W.D. Va.  July 31, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED