Court Opinion

ID: 2990358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 02:58:54.838038+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:31.707409
License: Public Domain

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1,
2012.

                                          In The

                       Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                      ____________

                                  NO. 14-12-00159-CR
                                    ____________

                  IN RE CHARLES PATRICK COLEMAN, Relator

                               ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                                WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                                    182nd District Court
                                     Harris County, Texas
                              Trial Court Cause No. 989,041

                      MEMORANDUM                      OPINION

       On February 21, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator
complains that respondent, the Honorable Jeanine S. Barr, presiding judge of the 182nd
District Court of Harris County, has failed to rule on his motion to enter judgment and
sentence nunc pro tunc, filed in the trial court on January 9, 2012.

       To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has
no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is
a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v.
Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.
2007) (orig. proceeding). Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the
court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1987) (orig. proceeding). To obtain mandamus relief for the refusal to rule, a relator
must establish: (1) the motion was properly filed and has been pending for a reasonable
time; (2) the relator requested a ruling on the motion; and (3) the trial court refused to rule.
See In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex.App.-Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); In re
Hearn, 137 S.W.3d at 685; In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 228.

       Relator has attached a copy of the motion on which he seeks a ruling but has not
established it was filed with the court clerk. It is relator’s burden to provide this court with
a record sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837
(Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). Relator has not established that the motion
was properly filed and that the trial court was asked to rule on it but failed to do so.

       Relator has not met his burden to obtain mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young,
236 S.W.3d at 210. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

                                            PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                               2