Court Opinion

ID: 2963685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:13:55.677675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:25.611638
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 7, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                        

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1601 

                     FRANCOIS O. SEVIGNY AND ALBERTA M. SEVIGNY,
                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                                   STATE OF MAINE,
                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1640 

                     FRANCOIS O. SEVIGNY AND ALBERTA M. SEVIGNY,
                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                               STATE OF MAINE, ET AL.,
                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
                                          ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Francois O. Sevigny and Alberta M. Sevigny on briefs pro se.
            ___________________     __________________
            Andrew Ketterer,  Attorney General,  and Leanne  Robbin, Assistant
            _______________                          ______________
        Attorney General, on brief for state appellees.
            William H.  Dale and Jensen  Baird Gardner &  Henry, on  brief for
            ________________     ______________________________
        Town of Sanford appellees.
            Sally  J. Daggett and  Jensen Baird Gardner &  Henry, on brief for
            _________________      _____________________________
        appellees, Jensen Baird  Gardner &  Henry, William H.  Dale, James  N.
        Katsiaficas and Sally J. Daggett.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the record on  appeal and
                 __________

            the briefs filed by the parties in these related appeals.  We

            find  neither error  of law  nor abuse  of discretion  in the

            district   court's  disposition   of  these  matters.     We,

            therefore,  affirm   the   dismissals  of   each   complaint,

            essentially  for the  reasons  stated in  the district  court

            order of May 15, 1995 and the judgment of May 25, 1995.

                 The appellants' request that we  reconsider our decision

            submitting these  appeals on briefs without  oral argument is

            denied.
            _______

                 The order of May 15, 1995, in district court docket #95-

            MC-46 and the  judgment of  May 25, 1995,  in district  court

            docket #95-cv-2 are affirmed.
                                _________

                                         -3-