Court Opinion

ID: 4313637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-19 19:26:17.942391+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:04:37.262044
License: Public Domain

People v Dixon (2018 NY Slip Op 06108)

People v Dixon

2018 NY Slip Op 06108

Decided on September 19, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 19, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-01585
2017-01586

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vShaquan Dixon, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 16-00260, 16-00296)

Carl D. Birman, White Plains, NY, for appellant.
Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jennifer Spencer and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), both imposed January 5, 2017, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., ROMAN, COHEN, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court