Court Opinion

ID: 9895598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-07 21:07:18.542126+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:37.483260
License: Public Domain

ORIGINAL                                        11/07/2023

            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

                                        DA 22-0083
                                                                      FILED
 STATE OF MONTANA,                                                     NOV - 7 2023
                                                                     Bowen Greenwood
                                                                   Clerk of Supreme Court
              Plaintiff and Appellee,                                 State of Montana

       v.                                                            ORDER

 WES LEE WHITAKER,

              Defendant and Appellant.

       Wes Lee Whitaker moves this Court to stay his appeal and has attached an
"affidavit" in support. Counsel for the State of Montana objects to Whitaker's motion.
       Whitaker contends that the trial record contains errors based on his recollection of
the criminal proceeding in the Missoula County District Court. He states that the "trial and
pre-trial records are not accurate" resulting in the need for a supplemental record. Whitaker
lists the alleged mistakes in the minute entry and various transcripts in the "affidavit."
       The State responds that Whitaker should not have filed this motion on his own
behalf because he is represented by counsel, as this Court has pointed out in two prior
orders. The State adds that this Court has warned Whitaker against making pro se filings.
Citing to the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, the State concludes that only
Whitaker's counsel may file such a motion and that Whitaker has failed to follow the
appropriate procedure to correct or to modify the record some fifteen months later. See
M. R. App. P. 16(1), 2(3), and 8(6).
       Whitaker's motion is not well-taken. His motion comes on the heels of our denials
of his previous motions to substitute counsel. Whitaker continues to act on his own behalf
while represented by appellate counsel, who has filed the opening brief last month.
Whitaker presents no good reason to delay this appeal. We conclude that he is not entitled
to his motion for a stay. Therefore,
      IT IS ORDERED that Whitaker's Motion to Stay Proceedings is DENIED.
      The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to
Wes Lee Whitaker personally.
      DA IED this    4.   day of November, 2023.

                                                           Chief Justice

                                                              tece.„.

                                                                        ,2)/(A/—

                                                             Justices

                                          2