Court Opinion

ID: 2963525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:11:28.852875+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:46.020450
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1290

                                  DAVID C. HALLAHAN,

                                     Petitioner,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Respondent.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                       [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            David C. Hallahan on brief pro se.
            _________________
            Donald  K. Stern, United  States Attorney,  and Timothy Q. Feeley,
            ________________                                _________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.

                                 ____________________

                                    August 8, 1995
                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.  We have  carefully reviewed the record.  We
                 __________

            affirm for substantially the reasons  stated in part B of the

            district court's opinion.  Petitioner's allegations  were too

            conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.

                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.  
                 ________

                                         -2-