Court Opinion

ID: 5790057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:07:51.82595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:14.370003
License: Public Domain

*479The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). We do not find the officer’s account of the events to be implausible, and the evidence establishes that he had a sufficient opportunity to observe the apparent drug transaction. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Acosta, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.