Court Opinion

ID: 5451891
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 19:07:07.993592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:26.401676
License: Public Domain

SULLIVAN, J.
I concur in the judgment annulling the decision of the Board. For the reasons -set forth in my dissenting opinion in Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (Talcott) ante, page 56 [84 Cal.Rptr. 140, 465 P.2d 28], I am of the opinion that the award of subsequent injuries benefits to the applicant herein should be annulled upon the ground that his claim therefor was
*77barred by the provisions of section 5410 of the Labor Code (see Subsequent etc. Fund v. Ind. Acc. Com. (Patterson) (1952) 39 Cal.2d 83 [244 P.2d 889]; Subsequent Injuries Fund v. I.A.C. (Pranzitelli) (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 606 [312 P.2d 78]; State of Cal. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Clubb) (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d 288 [318 P.2d 34]), and not upon the rationale relied upon by the majority with which I disagree.
Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied March 25, 1970.