Court Opinion

ID: 8464812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:42:26.159341+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.302572
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anttwaine Mandwell Dunlap appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunlap, No. 4:03-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.