Court Opinion

ID: 8670910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 22:21:02.191688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:19.857251
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Pernell Shannon appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shannon, No. 6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.