Court Opinion

ID: 9526169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:13:37.050169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:19:03.221807
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion-
Garrard, J.
— Because of the recent reaffirmance in Bright v. State (1972), 259 Ind. 495, 298 N.E.2d 128, of the doctrine that the trial court loses jurisdiction to further review its decision after an appeal is perfected and while it pends, I am compelled to concur in the dismissal.
However, I join Judge Staton in believing that while several courts should not be simultaneously engaged in reviewing *163a decision, some procedure should be adopted which would protect the losing party’s access to the various remedies provided by our codes of procedure and permit consolidation of the issues presented so that a prompt and efficacious determination may be reached.