Court Opinion

ID: 9481233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 08:11:58.707033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:48:10.237101
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The certification order and dissent filed on December 17, 1990 is redesignated a published order.
ORDER
1. This Court certifies that resolution by the Arizona Supreme Court of the following question of law set forth in Paragraph 2 will be determinative of a significant substantial question of law in the above-captioned ease.
2. Under Arizona law, would a person who gratuitously undertook to lend money to a person who then relied on his offer of the loan be liable under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 323 (1965) and McCutchen v. Hill, 147 Ariz. 401, 710 P.2d 1056 (1985) if he negligently failed to make the loan, causing economic harm to the would-be borrower?
3. Counsel for the parties are Paul Carroll, Pro Se, 5205 West Thunderbird, # 1004, Glendale, Arizona 85306, (602) 938-6990 and Richard G. Patrick, Assistant United States Attorney, 230 North 1st Avenue, Room 4000, Phoenix, Arizona, 85025, (602) 261-3011.
4. No party to this certification process will be allowed to request attorney’s fees or any costs associated with this certification process.
5. This Order is effective fourteen (14) days after the date thereof.
6. The Order and six (6) certified copies shall be forwarded, under seal, to the Arizona Supreme Court by the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit Court.
DATED this 17th day of December, 1990.