Court Opinion

ID: 3102329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:21:47.278478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:44:35.461464
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-11-00393-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

 
FRANCISCO P. GARZA
JR. 
A/K/A FRANK PEREZ
GARZA,                                                   Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.
 

 
                           On
appeal from the 156th District Court 
of Bee County, Texas.
 

 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
     Before Chief
Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 
Appellant,
Franscisco P. Garza Jr. a/k/a Frank Perez Garza, attempts to appeal his
conviction for possession of a controlled substance.  The trial court has
certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal.@  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On
June 23, 2011, this Court notified appellant=s
counsel of the trial court=s certification and ordered counsel
to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to
appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal,
or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended
certification.
On
July 21, 2011, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel=s response does not establish that the certification
currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has
a right to appeal.  
The
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if
the trial court=s certification does not show that the
defendant has the right of appeal.  Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex.
R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. 
Any pending motions are denied as moot.
 
PER
CURIAM
Do not publish.  
See Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
4th day of August,
2011.