Court Opinion

ID: 9700931
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 21:53:58.285493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:18.114411
License: Public Domain

OLSZEWSKI, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result only. While I agree with the trial court’s determination regarding the filing date of the post-trial motions, it is my opinion that the holding should be limited to the facts of this case. Therefore, I believe that Pa.R.C.P. 227.1(c)(2) should be strictly applied except in cases, analogous to the one at bar, in which (1) the appellant establishes lack of notice of the filing of the trial court’s decision, and (2) the appellees do not object or allege preju*591dice because of the date on which the post-trial motions were filed. It is my opinion that more expansive interpretation regarding Rule 227.1(c)(2) is within the strict purview of our Supreme Court’s rule-making province.