Court Opinion

ID: 5618833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:28:06.342603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:20.092789
License: Public Domain

Bloodworth, J.
The principle announced in All Church Press v. Harris Advertising Agency, 36 Ga. App. 616 (138 S. E. 85), is controlling in this case, and the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See Cooley v. Moss, 123 Ga. 707 (51 S. E. 625); Morrow v. Southern Empress Co., 101 Ga. 810 (28 S. E. 998); Bashinski v. Lake, 9 Ga. App. 352 (71 S. E. 702); Martin v. Cox, 13 Ga. App. 236 (79 S. E. 39); Manget v. Gariton, 34 Ga. App. 556 (3) (130 S. E. 604).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Lillie, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, for plaintiff in error.
Hewlett & Dennis,, contra.