Court Opinion

ID: 8672942
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:38:54.820299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.335534
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM ***
Marcial Guardado-Sivirian appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Guardado-Sivirian’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Guardado-Sivirian with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief, has been filed.
Guardado-Sivirian has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw; is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate, for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.