Court Opinion

ID: 9962051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-22 16:02:19.273185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:19:48.470683
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10787     Document: 12-1      Date Filed: 04/22/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                     In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eleventh Circuit

                           ____________________

                                  No. 24-10787
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                           ____________________

       ANGELA MCGRUDER,
                                                       Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       U.S. POSTMASTER GENERAL,

                                                     Defendant-Appellee.

       DOES,
       Government, Inclusive I through V, et al.,

                                                              Defendants.
USCA11 Case: 24-10787      Document: 12-1     Date Filed: 04/22/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 24-10787

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cv-24979-RH-HTC
                           ____________________

       Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The 60-day statutory time limit required Angela McGruder
       to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s May 4, 2023 final
       order and judgment on or before July 3, 2023. See 28 U.S.C.
       § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). However, McGruder did not
       file her notice of appeal until March 14, 2024. Accordingly, the no-
       tice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdic-
       tion. See Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 583 U.S. 17,
       26-27 (2017).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.