Court Opinion

ID: 1006172
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:07:25.649147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:44.464219
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6911

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PHILLIP CORDELL WILLIAMS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-99-360, CA-01-478-A)

Submitted:   December 20, 2001         Decided:     December 28, 2001

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Cordell Williams, Appellant Pro Se.           William Neil
Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Phillip Cordell Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-99-360;

CA-01-478-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2