Court Opinion

ID: 8451651
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:40:58.134439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.135092
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.