Court Opinion

ID: 9566308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 19:36:33.267958+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:35:43.464218
License: Public Domain

Beasley, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I fully concur in the opinion as far at it goes. But one step yet needs to be taken to complete the journey in this court.
Appellant had no reasonable basis for anticipating reversal of the trial court. The appeal’s weightlessness is illustrated in part by the deficiencies in the enumerations of error, which made discussion of the issues unnecessary in Divisions 2 through 5. It is a frivolous appeal, wasteful of the court’s and the appellees’ resources. Therefore, the trial court should be directed to enter judgment for a $500 penalty against appellant and in favor of appellees upon the return of the remittitur. Court of Appeals Rule 26 (b).