Court Opinion

ID: 9472296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 03:55:33.665357+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:42:50.988810
License: Public Domain

WALLACE, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I concur only in the majority’s result of affirming the district court. I believe the majority has improperly analyzed the problem and come to the wrong conclusion about the legality of Carter’s payments to the trust. Although the issue is not free from doubt, the approach and reasoning in the district court’s opinion in Carter II is, to me, more persuasive. See Carter v. CMTA-Molders & Allied Workers Health & Welfare Trust, 563 F.Supp. 244 (N.D.Cal.1983). Therefore, I would affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the district judge.