Court Opinion

ID: 4332602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-14 00:46:31.212423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:28.666248
License: Public Domain

STEPHEN L. AND DORALYNN GOODMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent JOHN R. AND PHYLLIS G. RAY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentGoodman v. CommissionerNo. 15386-98; No. 16864-98United States Tax CourtT.C. Memo 2000-23; 2000 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23; 79 T.C.M. 1398; January 19, 2000, Filed 2000 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*23  Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.  Howard A. Weinberger, for petitioners.Kenneth L. Bressler and Ann S. O'Blenes, for respondent.  Foley, Maurice B.FOLEYMEMORANDUM OPINIONFOLEY, JUDGE: By notice dated June 24, 1998, respondent determined deficiencies in, and penalties relating to, Stephen and Doralynn Goodman's 1994 and 1995 Federal income taxes. By notice dated July 16, 1998, respondent determined deficiencies in, and penalties relating to, John and Phyllis Ray's 1993 and 1995 Federal income taxes. After concessions, the sole issue for decision is whether discharge of indebtedness income that is excluded, pursuant to section 108, from the gross income of an S corporation increases the bases of petitioners' S corporation stock. The parties submitted this case fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. 2000 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*24  All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.At the time the petitions were filed, petitioners resided in Plano, Texas. During 1993, Messrs. Goodman and Ray were shareholders in Scientific Plastics, Inc., an S corporation. That year, Scientific Plastics, Inc., realized, but excluded pursuant to section 108(a), $ 1,583,365 of discharge of indebtedness income.On December 31, 1993, petitioners had suspended (i.e., unused) losses relating to Scientific Plastics, Inc. Petitioners increased their stock bases by the amount of their pro rata shares of Scientific Plastics, Inc.'s, discharge of indebtedness income and, on their 1993 tax returns, deducted their losses.Respondent contends that, pursuant to Nelson v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 114">110 T.C. 114 (1998), affd.  182 F.3d 1152">182 F.3d 1152 (10th Cir. 1999), the $ 1,583,365 of discharge of indebtedness income does not result in a basis increase in the Scientific Plastics, Inc., stock. In Nelson, we held that an S corporation's shareholder may not increase his basis to reflect the S corporation's2000 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23">*25  excluded discharge of indebtedness income. See id. Petitioners do not attempt to distinguish Nelson, but instead contend that Nelson was decided incorrectly. This case is indistinguishable from Nelson, and we need not reiterate our analysis. Accordingly, we hold that the discharge of indebtedness income does not increase petitioners' stock bases.To reflect the foregoing,Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.