Court Opinion

ID: 7027523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 05:30:14.217327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:10:48.854867
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM2
Rodrigo Alvarez-Gonzalez appeals the judgment of conviction and his 70 month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alvarez-Gonzalez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) on the basis of a prior conviction for an aggravated felony that was not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Alvarez-Gonzalez also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.