Court Opinion

ID: 4563285
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-05 00:00:29.714509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:46.889782
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-11363      Document: 00515554066         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/04/2020

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                  No. 19-11363                         September 4, 2020
                               Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   O B Thompson, III, also known as O B,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:18-CR-573-11

   Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent O B Thompson, III, has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Thompson has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-11363     Document: 00515554066          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/04/2020

                                   No. 19-11363

   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
   Thompson’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2