Court Opinion

ID: 8629735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:35:46.841393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:43.690415
License: Public Domain

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.
The register is correct in his conclusion, that in case no creditor attends at the place and time specified in the warrant and notice for the first meeting of creditors, the law provides for and requires the appointment of an as-signee of the bankrupt’s estate. If the register attends at the place and time specified in the warrant and notice for the first meeting of creditors, and no creditor has proved a debt, the meeting is held, within the purview of the act, as fully and effectually as if debts had been proved and creditors had attended or been represented at the meeting, and the contingency happens which the thirteenth section speaks of, namely, the contingency that no choice is made by the creditors at the meeting. If creditors have proved their debts, and attend or are represented, but fail to choose an assignee, then no choice is made by the creditors. If no creditor has proved a debt, so that no creditor has a right to vote in the choice of an assignee, then equally there is no choice of an assignee made by the creditors. In either case the judge, or, if there be no opposing interest, the register is to appoint one or more assignees.
[The clerk will certify this decision to the register, Isaac Dayton, Esq.] 2

 [From 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 85.]