Court Opinion

ID: 9960735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-16 21:01:02.069476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:19:50.211355
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2067      Doc: 35         Filed: 04/15/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-2067

        CHARLOTTE MACBAGITO,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; ASHISH TANDON,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00623-PTG-WEF)

        Submitted: April 11, 2024                                         Decided: April 15, 2024

        Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Charlotte MacBagito, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. Graziano, ECKERT SEAMANS
        CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2067      Doc: 35        Filed: 04/15/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Charlotte MacBagito appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants

        summary judgment on MacBagito’s claims for discrimination, harassment, and retaliation,

        in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17;

        retaliation, in violation of the Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1790b(a)(1); and

        wrongful termination, in violation of Virginia law. We have reviewed the record and find

        no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. MacBagito v.

        Pentagon Fed. Credit Union, No. 1:22-cv-00623-PTG-WEF (E.D. Va. Sept. 7, 2023). We

        grant MacBagito’s motion for leave to file an amended informal reply brief. We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2