Court Opinion

ID: 7694181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 18:43:33.895245+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:46.435622
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that the allegations in the Complaint clearly state a cause of action, it was error for the trial court to have dismissed it. See Ralph v. City of Daytona Beach, 471 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956). Accordingly, the improvidently entered order of dismissal is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed and remanded.