Court Opinion

ID: 2826793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-12 20:12:30.740653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:53.049793
License: Public Domain

People v Stockinger (2015 NY Slip Op 06525)

People v Stockinger

2015 NY Slip Op 06525

Decided on August 12, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 12, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2012-07774

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vScot H. Stockinger, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1551/12)

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed July 16, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed and, thus, his contention that this portion of the sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Russillo, 27 AD3d 493, 494).
The period of postrelease supervision imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court