Court Opinion

ID: 9376285
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-02 17:00:36.48147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:06.658584
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 22-2405
                        ___________________________

                        Wilber Antonio Rodriguez-Jerez

                            lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                          v.

            Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

                           lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                    ____________

                      Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                          Submitted: February 23, 2023
                             Filed: March 2, 2023
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Wilber Rodriguez-Jerez, a citizen of El Salvador, applied for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).
An immigration judge denied his application, and the Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA) dismissed his appeal. Rodriguez-Jerez petitions for review.
      Rodriguez-Jerez challenges only the denial of asylum and withholding of
removal, so we conclude that his CAT claim is waived. See Chay-Velasquez v.
Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim not raised or meaningfully argued
in opening brief is waived). We also conclude that he has waived review of his
asylum and withholding-of-removal claims because he has failed to meaningfully
challenge the agency’s reasons for denying them. See, e.g., Coreas-Chavez v.
Garland, 52 F.4th 413, 416 (8th Cir. 2022); Hassan v. Rosen, 985 F.3d 587, 590 n.1
(8th Cir. 2021); Njoroge v. Sessions, 709 Fed. Appx. 380, 380 & n.1, 381 (8th Cir.
2017) (per curiam).

       Even if Rodriguez-Jerez had not waived review, substantial evidence supported
the denial of asylum and withholding of removal. See Cano v. Barr, 956 F.3d 1034,
1038 (8th Cir. 2020) (standard of review). He did not demonstrate harm rising to the
extreme level of persecution, or an objectively reasonable fear of persecution, and
these determinations, alone, provided an independent reason for denying his asylum
application. See id. at 1039, 1040 n.4; Lemus-Arita v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 476, 482
(8th Cir. 2017); Garcia-Colindres v. Holder, 700 F.3d 1153, 1157, 1158 (8th Cir.
2012). Because his asylum claim failed, he necessarily failed to meet the higher
burden of proof for withholding of removal. See Cano, 956 F.3d at 1040.

      Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
                     ______________________________

                                        -2-