Court Opinion

ID: 3547969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:00:33.895587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:26.783991
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
March 21, 1942.
 OPINION
A petition for rehearing has been filed in the above-entitled matter, but cannot be considered in a case of this kind. Ex Parte Washer, 200 Cal. 598, 254 P. 951, 956; Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus Cases, 35 Nev. 80, 151, 129 P. 308; Ex Parte Robinson,71 Cal. 608, 12 P. 794; Ex Parte Shoemaker, 25 Cal.App. 551,144 P. 985; Application of Travers, 48 Cal.App. 764, 192 P. 454; Scott and Roe, Habeas Corpus, p. 72.
Petition denied.