Court Opinion

ID: 8424473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 00:42:32.550748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:28.832582
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Luxurious X appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luxurious X v. Vincent, No. CA-01-4419-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED