Court Opinion

ID: 9832288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:47:36.266974+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:45.308124
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing appellants say the plaintiff did not plead that the Whites assented to and ratified the action of Tom in giving the deed of trust to the bank.
We quote from the plaintiff’s supplemental petition at pages 113 and 114, of the transcript, as follows: “That the defendants, and each and all of them, not only had actual notice and knowledge of the taking of said deed of trust by this plaintiff, but were charged with notice thereof by virtue of, and from the time said deed of trust was so filed for record. That with said full knowledge, the defendants, and each and all of them, approved of the giving of said deed of trust to plaintiff, and its acceptance thereof.”
The motion for rehearing is overruled.