Court Opinion

ID: 995739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:41:26.695867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:46.263566
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6494

GEORGE HAIGLER, JR.,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,
Attorney General,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-3070-0-17BD)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                  Decided:   July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Haigler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     George Haigler, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the mag-

istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. Haigler v. South Carolina, No. CA-97-

3070-0-17BD (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2