Court Opinion

ID: 3554595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:06:04.014857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:34.577706
License: Public Domain

There is nothing in the case to take it out of the general rules that an infant is responsible for his torts. Fitts v. Hall, 9 N.H. 441; School District v. Bragdon, 23 N.H. 507, 516; Beckley v. Newcomb, 24 N.H. 359; Woodman v. Hubbard, 25 N.H. 67, 73; Prescott v. Norris, 32 N.H. 101; Eaton v. Hill, 50 N.H. 235; Cooley Torts 103.
Exception overruled.
BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.