Court Opinion

ID: 544449
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:21.516751
License: Public Domain

907 F.2d 1139Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Randolph Willis RINGSTAD, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Warden WANNAMAKER;  Dutchman Correctional Institution;  T.Travis Medlock, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 89-6021.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 1990.Decided June 6, 1990.Rehearing Denied July 10, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Clyde H. Hamilton, District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-1350-15K-3)
Randolph Willis Ringstad, appellant pro se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Randolph Willis Ringstad seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Ringstad v. Wannamaker, CA-89-2350-15K-3 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.