Court Opinion

ID: 8625658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 13:19:37.669308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:37.677562
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
William Henry Harrison appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Adams, No. l:06-cv-00501-TSE (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2007; filed Mar. 19, 2007, entered Mar. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.