Court Opinion

ID: 1000624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:43:28.002819+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:10.702560
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

BONITA R. DEMBY,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-96-440, CA-99-314-AM)

Submitted:   December 16, 1999            Decided:   January 10, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bonita R. Demby, Appellant Pro Se. Randy I. Bellows, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Bonita R. Demby seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Demby, Nos. CR-96-440; CA-99-

314-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 1999).*   We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
August 12, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on August 16, 1999. Pursuant to Rules
58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the
date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as
the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                2