Court Opinion

ID: 9565824
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 19:28:40.823288+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:54.438584
License: Public Domain

*685Judge GREENE
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority that the statute of limitation bars plaintiffs’ claim regarding the county’s 1979 rezoning. However, I do not agree that the 1988 rezoning is spot zoning. The tract of land contained in the 1988 rezoning (“Highway Business”) is contiguous to and actually includes the property rezoned in 1979 as “General Business,” and, therefore, I agree with defendants that the 1988 tract of land is “not a small lot singled out for special treatment.” Had this court determined that the 1979 zoning was unlawful, I would agree with plaintiffs’ argument that the 1988 rezoning was spot zoning, but that potential argument is now irrelevant.