Court Opinion

ID: 7374828
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-28 17:01:16.600184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:03.466229
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 21-1731V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

 REBEKAH SCHAFFER,                                          Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                         Filed: June 27, 2022
 v.
                                                            Special Processing Unit (SPU);
 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                    Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
 HUMAN SERVICES,                                            Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                            Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
                       Respondent.

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Meghan Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                   RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

       On August 19, 2021, Rebekah Schaffer filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that “as a result of receiving the flu vaccination on
October 8, 2018, [Petitioner] suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”).” Petition at ¶1.
Petitioner further alleges she “suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six
months after the administration of the flu vaccine.” Petition at ¶49. The case was assigned
to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

       On June 24, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
Specifically, Respondent states that “Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) for
a flu/GBS Table injury.” Id. at 12. Respondent further agrees that “her condition has
persisted for at least six months, and there is no alternative cause that explains her
condition.” Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                        s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                        Brian H. Corcoran
                                                        Chief Special Master

                                             2