Court Opinion

ID: 8451013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:19:32.144525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.561223
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Ernest Coward appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coward, No. 7:07-cr-00069-*280GEC-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.