Court Opinion

ID: 293933
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:48:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:34:56.738648
License: Public Domain

435 F.2d 1308
76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2320, 64 Lab.Cas.  P 11,430
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.ITT HANZE VALVE SERVICE, CONTROLS AND INSTRUMENT DIVISION,INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION,Respondent.
No. 28607.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 14, 1971.

Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Florida Case).
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, d.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Marjorie S. Gofreed, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
George C. Longshore, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO.
Clyde N. Wells, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and GODBOLD, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Although the proof was not overwhelming, we conclude that there was substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's findings: that the respondent did not bargain in good faith with the Union, in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act; that the strike which occurred on April 27, 1966, was caused by unfair labor practices, as defined by the Act; that the respondent instituted a work rule change without notice to the Union for the purpose of discouraging Union activity, and in violation of Section 8(a)(5), (3) and (1) of the Act; that the respondent interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act; that the respondent terminated and refused to reinstate unfair labor practice strikers in violation of Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act; and that, therefore, the order of the Board will be enforced.