Court Opinion

ID: 1018103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:14:52.743326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:58.395207
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Cheryl Schwender appeals from the district court’s orders denying her motion and renewed motion for a more definite response and denying relief in her civil action in which she asserted that her insurance company engaged in unfair insurance practices in determining that she was at fault in an automobile accident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Schwender v. Erie Ins. Co.,
  
  No. CA-03-94-5 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & 5, 2005). We deny Erie Insurance Company’s motion for sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED