Court Opinion

ID: 4549608
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-07-20 19:12:52.661107+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:53.382955
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE             )                 No. 78689-0-I
PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF:           )
                                 )                 DIVISION ONE
CHAD HURN,                       )
                                 )                 ORDER GRANTING MOTION
                Petitioner.      )                 FOR RECONSIDERATION,
                                 )                 WITHDRAWING OPINION, AND
________________________________ )                 SUBSTITUTING OPINION

          Petitioner, Chad Hurn, has filed a motion for reconsideration of the opinion

filed on May 18, 2020. The State of Washington has filed a response to

petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. The court has determined that the motion

should be granted, the opinion withdrawn, and a substitute opinion filed; now,

therefore, it is hereby

          ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is granted; and it is further

          ORDERED that the opinion filed on May 18, 2020 is withdrawn; and it is

further

          ORDERED that a substitute opinion shall be filed.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE             )                 No. 78689-0-I
PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF:           )
                                 )                 DIVISION ONE
CHAD HURN,                       )
                                 )                 UNPUBLISHED OPINION
                Petitioner.      )
                                 )
________________________________ )

       PER CURIAM — Chad Hurn challenges his sentence for second degree

assault as exceeding the statutory maximum. We accept the State’s concession

that the combined term of confinement and community custody exceeded the

statutory maximum. Accordingly, we grant Hurn’s personal restraint petition,

reverse the sentence, and remand for the trial court to resentence him consistent

with RCW 9.94A.701(9).

       A jury convicted Hurn of 13 counts including second degree assault,

unlawful possession of a firearm, possession of a stolen firearm, possession of a

stolen vehicle, making or having vehicle theft tools, identity theft, tampering with a

witness, communication with a minor for immoral purposes, and intimidating a

witness in King County Cause No. 13-1-01806-0 SEA. On Count 1, second degree

assault, the court imposed a term of 120 months confinement, consisting of a

standard range sentence of 84 months plus 36 months for a mandatory firearm

enhancement. The court ordered that the sentences on all counts run concurrently

except for Count 3, which the court ordered to run consecutively. The court
No. 78689-0-I/2

imposed a total of 252 months confinement and 18 months of community custody.

This court affirmed Hurn’s convictions on appeal. State v. Hurn, 71813-4-I (Wash.

Ct. App. Dec. 7, 2015) (unpublished)

https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/718134.pdf.

       Hurn then filed a CrR 7.8 motion challenging the sentence. The superior

court transferred the motion to this court for consideration as a personal restraint

petition. CrR 7.8(c)(2). Hurn claims that on Count 1, the combined terms of

confinement and community custody exceed the statutory maximum for the offense

in violation of RCW 9.94A.505. Thus, he contends the sentence must be reversed

and remanded for the trial court to resentence him.

       RCW 9.94A.505(5) prohibits the trial court from imposing a combined term

of confinement and community custody that exceeds the statutory maximum. The

State concedes and we agree that the trial court exceeded its authority by

sentencing Hurn to a term of community custody of 18 months in addition to a

120-month term of confinement on his conviction for second degree assault in

Count 1. See RCW 9A.36.021(1)(c), (2); RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b) (10-year statutory

maximum). Because the challenged sentence is a standard range sentence, we

reverse and remand for the trial court to either amend the community custody

term or resentence Hurn on Count 1 consistent with RCW 9.94A.701(9). State v.

Boyd, 174 Wash. 2d 470, 473, 275 P.3d 321 (2012); In re Pers. Restraint of

McWilliams, 182 Wash. 2d 213, 217, 340 P.3d 223 (2014).

       Hurn further claims the judgment and sentence erroneously states the

total term of confinement as 252 months. He mistakenly asserts that the longest

                                         -2-
No. 78689-0-I/3

sentence was on Count 3 (96 months) and that Count 2 (116 months) ran

consecutively, coming up with a total of 248 months after adding 36 months for

the firearm enhancement. The longest sentence was actually on Count 13 (120

months), and Count 3 (96 months), not Count 2, ran consecutively to the other

counts. Thus, adding 36 months for the firearm enhancement, the total

confinement is correctly stated in the judgment and sentence as 252 months.

      We grant Hurn’s petition and remand to the trial court to enter a sentence

consistent with RCW 9.94A.701(9).

                                        For the court:

                                      -3-