Court Opinion

ID: 5815301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 19:40:52.26922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:58.866167
License: Public Domain

In an action on two performance bonds, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 1976, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve a further amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (cf. Rochester Poster Adv. Co. v Town of Penfield, 51 AD2d 870). Defendants’ time to answer is extended *589until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.