Court Opinion

ID: 4702645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-10 00:00:42.359953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:23.479420
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-20266     Document: 00515932653         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/09/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                           July 9, 2021
                                  No. 20-20266
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:14-CR-581-1

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro
   Mondragon-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
   in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United
   States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mondragon-Gonzalez has not
   filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20266     Document: 00515932653          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/09/2021

                                   No. 20-20266

   of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
   the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2