Court Opinion

ID: 4221250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-17 01:00:31.038403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:49.589906
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-40382      Document: 00514240998         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/16/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 17-40382                                    FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                          November 16, 2017
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                    Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BENITO MARTINEZ-IPINA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:16-CR-1394-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benito Martinez-
Ipina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011).       Martinez-Ipina has submitted an untimely response
challenging his conviction. Even if it were timely, because the record reflects
that Martinez-Ipina knowingly decided not to appeal his conviction, we will not

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40382      Document: 00514240998   Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/16/2017

                                 No. 17-40382

address the issues raised in his response. See United States v. Polanco-Ozorto,
772 F.3d 1053, 1054-55 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2