Court Opinion

ID: 1004353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:39:52.190096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:45.993237
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6311

ELMER K. FLOYD,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-437-3)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                    Decided:   May 7, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer K. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Elmer Floyd appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying re-

lief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).*   We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the magistrate judge.   See Floyd v. Baskerville, No. CA-

00-437-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

     *
       This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of
the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

                                  2