Court Opinion

ID: 993424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:07:49.906868+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:35:42.396239
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

VALERIE D. MASSARD, a/k/a Cynthia Williams,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-94-143, CA-96-736-2)

Submitted:   October 10, 1997          Decided:     November 14, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Valerie D. Massard, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Massard, Nos. CR-94-143; CA-96-736-2
(S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion to

authorize preparation of transcript at government expense. We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2