Court Opinion

ID: 5612567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:06:13.097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:09.092540
License: Public Domain

Broyles, C. J.
1. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the other portions of the charge set out in that ground, contains no reversible error.
2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Hardy & Peavy, for plaintiff in error,
cited: 90 Ga. 691; 92- Ga. 463; 106 Ga. 368; 125 Ga. 11; 9 Ga. App. 291 (1); 10 Ga. App. 831; 12 Ga. App. 540; 1 Ga. App. 118; 2 Ga. App. 418; 7 Ga. App. 541 (6).
C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra,
cited: 7 Ga. App. 848; 125 Ga. 101.