Court Opinion

ID: 4124126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-07 21:08:35.393568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:48.531454
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  January 30, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0241. LINDSEY NELSON, JR. v. THE STATE.

      In 2001, a jury found Lindsey Nelson, Jr., guilty of burglary with intent to
commit theft, burglary with intent to commit terroristic threats, and terroristic threats.
The trial court merged the second burglary count into the first burglary count for
sentencing purposes. Nelson appealed, and we affirmed his convictions. Nelson v.
State, 277 Ga. App. 92 (625 SE2d 465) (2005). In 2016, Nelson filed a motion to
correct a void and illegal sentence, arguing that his terroristic threat conviction should
have merged with his burglary conviction. The trial court denied the motion, and
Nelson filed this application for discretionary appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
      Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year
after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,
whichever is later. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247)
(2010). Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void
sentence. Id. And a sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law
does not allow. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). “Motions
to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the
existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law
does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe
punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” Von Thomas v. State,
293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013).
      Here, Nelson contends that the trial court should have merged his sentences for
burglary and terroristic threats. But such a merger argument is a challenge to his
convictions, not to his sentence. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 92 (695 SE2d 244)
(2010). Moreover, this Court has already ruled that the trial court did not err in
refusing to merge the convictions. Nelson, 277 Ga. App. at 99 (4). Because Nelson
has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack jurisdiction to consider his
application for discretionary appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

                                     Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                            Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                      01/30/2017
                                            I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                     the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                            Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                     hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                     , Clerk.