Court Opinion

ID: 7486886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:04:00.649897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:04.241828
License: Public Domain

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.
Viewed in a light favorable to the City, the evidence supports the trial court’s decision that the City is not estopped to enforce its zoning ordinance proscribing the use of appellants’ house by paying boarders. The evidence on the elements of estoppel was conflicting and did not establish appellants’ right to continued use as a matter of law. City of North Miami v. Margulies, 289 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.