Court Opinion

ID: 7375278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-28 23:14:37.634173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:08.486195
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7656      Doc: 7        Filed: 02/23/2022     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 21-7656

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        WALKER GREGORY CAMP, JR.,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Spartanburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (7:15-cr-00452-BHH-1)

        Submitted: February 17, 2022                                 Decided: February 23, 2022

        Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Walker Gregory Camp, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Justin William Holloway, Assistant United
        States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South
        Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7656      Doc: 7        Filed: 02/23/2022     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Walker Gregory Camp, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse

        of discretion in the district court’s determination that Camp failed to demonstrate an

        extraordinary and compelling basis for relief. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185

        (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2