Court Opinion

ID: 9467435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 01:48:48.759954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:40:20.773008
License: Public Domain

WILLIAM E. DOYLE,
Circuit Judge, dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in No. 78-1806 — James v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 638 F.2d 147.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing is denied. See the Per Curiam filed today in No. 78-1806 — James, et al. v. Ford Motor Credit Company, et al, 638 F.2d 147.
Judge Doyle would grant the petition for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing having been denied by the panel to whom the case was argued and submitted and no member of the panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.