Court Opinion

ID: 8428129
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 04:21:11.656717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:33.640287
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Surinderpal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. The IJ offered specific, cogent reasons for his finding based on inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony and his declaration going to the heart of his asylum claim, including his arrests, the length of his detention, and where he fled to after his second arrest. See id. at 1043. Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).
In addition, substantial evidence supports the denial of relief under CAT. See id. at 1157.
PETITION DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.