Court Opinion

ID: 9957923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-05 18:00:46.185842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:17:33.156566
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10890            Document: 48-1        Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/05/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                   ____________
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 23-10890
                                  Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                  ____________                                     April 5, 2024
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Michael Dywayne Harris,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:20-CR-32-5
                   ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Michael Harris has moved to
withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record,
and Harris’s response.

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10890       Document: 48-1      Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/05/2024

                                No. 23-10890

      We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-
frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                     2