Court Opinion

ID: 3249269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 16:20:40.29311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:51.342191
License: Public Domain

The complaint was made before the Jefferson county court of misdemeanors, a court having by statute the jurisdiction of justices of the peace, by Hattie Mooney, a single woman, alleging that she was delivered of a bastard child in Jeferson county, Ala., and accusing the defendant of being the father of such child. This was in strict accord with Code 1907, § 6364. If it should have appeared from the affidavit that the birth of the child had taken place more than 12 months before the beginning of the proceedings, it would have been the duty of the court to have quashed the process, unless it had also been made to appear that the defendant in the meantime acknowledged or supported the child. State v. Woodson, 99 Ala. 201,13 So. 580. But the statute limiting the time for bringing the complaint is defensive matter and, unless it appears on the face of the complaint, cannot be raised by motion to quash or demurrer. The court's rulings on these questions were free from error.
Admitting that the officer executing the warrant had no authority to make the arrest of defendant in Etowah county without an indorsement on the warrant as required by Code 1907, § 6278, the time for testing that question passed, when defendant appeared before the Jefferson county court of misdemeanors. The warrant in this case is not jurisdictional and, whatever its defects or the defects of its execution, had served its purpose. The inferior court had the complaint and the defendant before it, and the objection to the regularity of the arrest was a mere quibble.
We find no reversible error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.