Court Opinion

ID: 8108169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:35:32.759552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:43.667794
License: Public Domain

Wilson, Judge:
These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties herein:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to in the attached Schedule A, as follows:
1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States, C.D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.
2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, are the unit prices shown in attached Schedule A, in U.S. currency, net, packed, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.
3. The above appeals for reappraisement are abandoned as to all entries and merchandise not listed in the attached Schedule A, and the said appeals for reappraisement may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.
On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of . 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise herein involved, and that such values were the unit prices as shown in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made part of our decision herein, in United States currency, net, packed.
The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are hereby dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.