Court Opinion

ID: 9323386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-07 00:04:58.495087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:47.129748
License: Public Domain

ORIGINAL
                                                                                            12/06/2022

            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
                                                                                        Case Number: OP 22-0643
                                        OP 22-0643                         tr-L 1
                                                                            DEC 0 6 2022
KEITH E. DOYLE,                                                           BOWen Greenwood
                                                                        Clerk of Supreme Court
                                                                           State of Montana
              Petitioner,
       v.
                                                                      ORDER
MONTANA SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT,

              Respondent.

       Keith E. Doyle has filed a motion for Writ of Supervisory Control "to provide
oversight in the Second Judicial District Court regarding [his] filing of a Motion in the
Nature of Writ of Error Coram Nobis."
       Doyle filed his coram nobis motion in the District Court regarding his prior
conviction. He was sentenced in 2005, and has repeatedly sought relief with this Court.'
On July 2, 2019, this Court ordered that Doyle was required to file a motion for leave with
the Clerk of Supreme Court before filing further petitions challenging his 2005 conviction
and sentence. See Doyle v. McTighe, No. OP 19-0356, Order at 4 (Mont. Jul. 2, 2019)
(Doyle X). Doyle did not move for leave here.
       Exercise of supervisory control is discretionary and on a case-by-case basis. M. R.
App. P. 14(3). "This extraordinary remedy can be invoked when the case involves purely
legal questions and urgent or emergency factors make the normal appeal process
inadequate." State v. Spady, 2015 MT 218, ¶ 11, 380 Mont. 179, 354 P.3d 590 (citations

 State v. Keith Doyle, 2007 MT 125, 337 Mont. 308, 160 P.3d 516 (Doyle I); Doyle v. State, No.
DA 08-0218, 2009 MT 105N, 2009 Mont. LEXIS 114 (Mar. 31, 2009) (Doyle II); Doyle v.
0 'Fallon, No. OP 08-0628, Order (Mont. Mar. 11, 2009) (Doyle Ill); Doyle v. Frink, No. OP 13-
0290, Order (Mont. Jun. 5, 2013) (Doyle IV); Doyle v. Frink, No. OP 13-0325, Order (Mont. Jun.
5, 2013) (Doyle V); Doyle v. State, No. DA 16-0167, 2017 MT 90N, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 171 (Apr.
18, 2017) (Doyle VI); Doyle v. McTighe, No. OP 19-0356, Order (Mont. Jul. 3, 2019) (Doyle VII);
Doyle v. State, No. OP 22-0052, Order (Mont. Feb. 15, 2022) (Doyle VIII); and Doyle v.
Salrnonsen, No. OP 22-0119, Order (Mont. Apr. 19, 2022) (Doyle IX).
omitted). "The case must meet one of three additional criteria: (a) [T]he other court is
proceeding under a mistake of law and is causing a gross injustice; (b) [C]onstitutional
issues of state-wide importance are involved; or (c) [T]he other court has granted or denied
a motion for substitution of a judge in a criminal case." Spady, ¶ 11 (quoting M. R. App.
P. 14(3)(a)-(c)).
       Doyle is not entitled to a writ of supervisory control over the District Court. His
proceeding in the District Court has ended, he appealed his conviction, which this Court
affirmed in 2007, and in 2009, this Court affirmed the District Court's denial of his petition
for postconviction relief. See Doyle I and Doyle II. This Court has no proceeding at the
District Court over which to take control. Spady, ¶ 11; M. R. App. P. 14(3).
       Furthermore, Doyle's arguments are in error because, since October 1, 2011, coram
nobis is not available as a postconviction remedy. The Montana Legislature consolidated
common law statutory remedies to challenge a sentence, conviction, or illegal incarceration
under Title 46, Chapter 21, for postconviction proceedings. In re McNair, 189 Mont. 321,
323, 615 P.2d 916, 917 (1980); State v. Barrack, 267 Mont. 154, 159-60, 882 P.2d. 1028,
1031 (1994). Various bills and writs, including the writ of coram nobis, were abolished
frorn Montana jurisprudence by M. R. Civ. P. 60(e). His reliance upon and citation to
United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 513, 74 S. Ct. 247, 253, provides no assistance to
him in a state court. Therefore,
       IT IS ORDERED that Doyle's Motion for a Writ of Supervisory Control is DENIED
and DISMISSED.
       IT IS ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED as of this Order's date.
       The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the
Honorable Kurt Krueger, Second Judicial District Court; Tom Power, Clerk of District
Court, Butte-Silver Bow County, under Cause No. DC 03-110C; counsel of record: and
Keith E. Doyle.
       DATED this          day of December, 2022.