Court Opinion

ID: 9549472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:19:15.636058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:20:22.884708
License: Public Domain

SHENK, J.
I concur in the affirmance of the first, second and third paragraphs of the injunction order, but I discover no necessity or propriety in striking the fourth paragraph from the order. There is nothing in the record which indicates in the slightest degree that the fourth paragraph of the injunction was intended to apply to editorial comment nor anything which could come within the proper exercise of free speech, press and assembly. It was directed against unlawful combinations denounced by the Hot Cargo Act (Lab. Code, §§ 1131-1134) which act was, in my opinion, unjustifiably declared invalid in In re Blaney, 30 Cal.2d 643 [184 P.2d 892], The judgment of injunction should be affirmed in its entirety.
Appellants’ petition for a rehearing was denied March 4, 1948.