Court Opinion

ID: 2649402
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-01-15 21:05:20.807285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:36:01.893631
License: Public Domain

FILED
                           NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 JAN 15 2014

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-50048

              Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:92-mj-04048-BTM-1

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
ANTONIO FLORES-CURIEL,

              Defendant - Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of California
                   Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted January 9, 2014**
                               Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

       Antonio Flores-Curiel does not qualify for expungement of his 1992

conviction under the Federal First Offender Act (FFOA), 18 U.S.C. § 3607. He

concedes that he was not sentenced under § 3607(a) and that he was over 21 at the

        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
        **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
                                                                        Page 2 of 2
time of the offense. Thus, he does not meet the FFOA’s conditions for

expungement. See United States v. Crowell, 374 F.3d 790, 792 (9th Cir. 2004).

      AFFIRMED.