Court Opinion

ID: 9832454
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:55:31.65483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:46.962896
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant criticizes our statement that the alley along which the boys were pass-' ing at the time they were attracted to the' washing machine was a public alley. By this statement we intended nothing more than that the alley was one commonly used by the public, and that they were not trespassers upon the private property of appellant at the time they were first attracted by the washing machine.
It is true that the alley belonged to the railroad and that the boys had to cross over a service track before reaching the property of appellant; however, such facts in our opinion do not change the situation in any particular.
We have carefully considered appellant’s motion for a rehearing and same is in all things overruled.