Court Opinion

ID: 4086054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-08 00:04:57.876442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:24.316883
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered March 30, 2011. The judgment dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict.
 

  It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
 

  Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a judgment declaring that she acquired an easement by prescription on three portions of defendants’ property, for the benefit of her property. Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff failed to preserve for
   
   *1460
   
  our review her contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence inasmuch as she failed to make a timely motion to set aside the verdict on that ground
  
   (see Murdoch v Niagara Falls Bridge Commn.,
  
  81 AD3d 1456, 1457 [2011],
  
   lv denied
  
  17 NY3d 702 [2011];
  
   Homan v Herzig
  
  [appeal No. 2], 55 AD3d 1413, 1413-1414 [2008]). In any event, it cannot be said that “the evidence so preponderated in favor of the plaintiff that [the verdict] could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence”
  
   (Martinez v Wascom,
  
  57 AD3d 1415, 1416 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted];
  
   see Manouselis v Woodworth Realty, LLC,
  
  83 AD3d 801 [2011];
  
   see generally Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,
  
  86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Lindley, JJ.