Court Opinion

ID: 525981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:00:58+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:26.749252
License: Public Domain

878 F.2d 1445
Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.  This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.In re Richard F. STRATFULL.
No. 89-1145.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1989.

Before FRIEDMAN, ARCHER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

1
The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), affirming the examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 103 (1982 & Supp.  IV 1986) of claims 1-9, 12-19, 21-26, and 28-32 of Stratfull's patent application, Serial Number 684,900, is affirmed on the basis of the Board's opinion dated May 6, 1988 and its opinion on reconsideration dated October 18, 1988.