Court Opinion

ID: 9965247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-01 21:01:33.067422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:50.785059
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10623    Document: 13-1     Date Filed: 05/01/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 24-10623
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       JAMES RASHAD CLAY,
                                                   Petitioner-Appellant,
       versus
       WARDEN,

                                                  Respondent-Appellee.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Georgia
                    D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02971-SEG
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-10623       Document: 13-1      Date Filed: 05/01/2024      Page: 2 of 2

       2                       Opinion of the Court                   24-10623

       Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. James Clay, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from
       the magistrate judge’s final report and recommendation (“R&R”)
       that his habeas petition be denied. We lack jurisdiction to review
       the R&R because it has not been rendered final by the district court.
       See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061,
       1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982); Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148
       F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.