Court Opinion

ID: 8274547
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 00:16:09.094947+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:37.914728
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                       NO. WR-94,173-01

                     EX PARTE PATRICK EUGENE NASH, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
             CAUSE NO. B20199-1604-W1 IN THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HALE COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of sexual performance of a child and sentenced to thirty years’

imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Nash v. State, No. 07-19-

00298-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 27, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to tender as an exhibit or

otherwise make the search warrant a part of the trial record. Applicant also contends that appellate

counsel was ineffective for failing to supplement the record with the search warrant, which prevented

him from presenting a record sufficient to support the suppression claim raised on appeal. Applicant
                                                                                                       2

has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668

(1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order both trial

counsel and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial

court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by

counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by

counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings

of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and

Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make specific findings as to trial counsel’s and

appellate counsel’s reasons for not making the search warrant part of the trial and/or appellate record.

The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response

to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: October 12, 2022
Do not publish