Court Opinion

ID: 3183687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-09 01:04:41.252659+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:39:14.417136
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-40946      Document: 00513411004         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/08/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 15-40946
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            March 8, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMON DARIO LEMUS-PERDOMO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:14-CR-667-1

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Dario Lemus-Perdomo has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Lemus-Perdomo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
Lemus-Perdomo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-40946   Document: 00513411004     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/08/2016

                                No. 15-40946

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.       Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.   Lemus-Perdomo’s incorporated motion for the appointment of
substitute counsel is DENIED.

                                     2