Court Opinion

ID: 9420784
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:55:58.100725+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:27.035235
License: Public Domain

Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice Frankfurter.
Memorandum of
Mr. Justice Frankfurter.
This seems to me to be another instance where it becomes helpful to an understanding of the exercise of the Court’s discretionary jurisdiction in granting or denying certiorari, to indicate the kind of question that did not commend itself to at least four Justices as appropriate for review by this Court. Several questions were raised by the petition for certiorari. It suffices to indicate the nature of only one, which can be most helpfully conveyed by giving the views of the Court of Appeals and of the dissenting opinion. 193 F. 2d 848.