Court Opinion

ID: 998330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:09:21.415172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:15.043482
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6068

WAYNE ALLEN BREATHWAITE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

G. M. HINKLE, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-98-538-3)

Submitted:   February 23, 1999            Decided:   March 31, 1999

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Allen Breathwaite, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Wayne Allen Breathwaite appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Breathwaite v. Hinkle, No. CA-

98-538-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1998). We also deny Breathwaite’s

motion to amend proceedings.     We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2