Court Opinion

ID: 667967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:22:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.255200
License: Public Domain

21 F.3d 1117
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Raymond William HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-10250.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 1994.*Decided April 11, 1994.

Before:  POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Raymond William Harris appeals his conviction and 240-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to maintaining a place for the purpose of distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 856(a)(1).  Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Harris' counsel submitted a brief identifying no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 78 (1988), discloses no issue for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3