Court Opinion

ID: 8470482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 11:57:09.807843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:18.287006
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2, 2009 WL 1290168 (S.D.W.Va. May 8, 2009). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.