Court Opinion

ID: 2817055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-15 04:50:49.7499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:58.908342
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 14, 2015

                                      NO. 03-14-00494-CR

                                   Isaac Benavidez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

           APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY
           BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND
                 AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ briefs, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                          JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 14, 2015

                                      NO. 03-14-00495-CR

                                   Isaac Benavidez, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

           APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY
           BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND
                 AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ briefs, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.