Court Opinion

ID: 5890107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 02:45:12.983736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:18.628408
License: Public Domain

*550In the instant case, the letter of the plaintiff broker to the defendant stated that the plaintiff’s commission was "due and payable in full upon closing”. Under the maxim contra proferentem, where "there is any doubt or uncertainty as to the meaning of the disputed language in the brokerage agreement, all ambiguity must be resolved against the broker who prepared it” (Graff v Billet, 64 NY2d 899, 902, and cases cited therein). Therefore, we must construe the language here against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant, and find that the defendant was not required to pay the commission until closing had taken place. As that eventuality never occurred, the plaintiff cannot recover any commission from the defendant, and the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.