Court Opinion

ID: 9769896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 15:07:17.117744+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:09.058319
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The Plaintiff, in his motion for rehearing, correctly challenges a statement we made when we overruled the Plaintiff’s point regarding his theory of quantum meruit. When the Plaintiff rested, the trial Court granted Harwell’s motion for judgment and did not dispose of the point as to quantum meruit as a fact finder. Our statement regarding that point is withdrawn. We are required to review the evidence and the inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff’s contention that liability of Harwell existed under quantum meruit. We have done so and the point is overruled.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.