Court Opinion

ID: 552503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:24.578500
License: Public Domain

920 F.2d 927Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Michael L. WILLIAMS-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.R.L. COLVIN, Officer,--E.C.I., T. Kimball,--E.C.I.,Assistant Warden, Kathleen S. Green, ActingWarden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6335.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 24, 1990.Decided Dec. 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge.  (CA-89-344-PN)
Michael L. Williams-Bey, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Michael L. Williams-Bey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Williams-Bey v. Colvin, CA-89-344-PN (D.Md. Oct. 11, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.