Court Opinion

ID: 5754191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:03:35.158937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:22.397365
License: Public Domain

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 11, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. The action is remitted to the trial court for a hearing -upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confession and for further proceedings in accordance herewith. In the meantime this appeal will be held in abeyance. Defendant’s conviction was based, in part, upon his alleged confession which the defendant contended had been coerced. The issue as to whether the confession was voluntary or involuntary was submitted to the jury. We are therefore constrained to remit this action to the trial court for further proceedings (Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368). Such proceedings shall be in accordance with the procedure prescribed by this court in its decision of December 21, 1964 (see, e.g., People v. Davis, 22 A D 2d 9-21), as modified and amplified by the Court of Appeals in its subsequent decision (People v. Suntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., •concur.