Court Opinion

ID: 9767847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:30:28.594116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:33.786776
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
As a part of their motion for rehearing appellants move for eighteen specific findings which are allegedly findings of fact. Some of such requests are either conclusions of law or mixed conclusions of law and fact. Virtually all of them are extremely general, and are ambiguous and uncertain concerning the dates, places and persons involved. The said requests are denied for such reasons and further because they tend to conflict with the findings, and conclusions stated in our original opinion, or they relate to matters allegedly shown by undisputed testimony and which are available to appellants on further proceedings, without findings or conclusions by this Court. Appellants do not specify the points upon which there is no finding of fact or upon which the findings are insufficient in accordance with Rule 455, Texas. Rules of Civil Procedure, nor do they request us to make findings and conclusions which we consider to be correct in connection with the subject matter of such requests; instead, they insist upon the specifically worded findings submitted by them. We reiterate and adhere to the findings and conclusions of the trial court which we approved in the original opinion instead of making the requested findings which are included in appellants’ motion for rehearing. Blocker v. Brown Express, Inc., 144 S.W.2d 451 (Tex.Civ.App., 1940, writ refused) ; Gregory v. City of Garland, 333 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Civ.App., 1959, writ refused, n. r. e.).
We find no merit in the matters raised in appellants’ motion for rehearing and the same is overruled.