Court Opinion

ID: 551400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.908005
License: Public Domain

918 F.2d 956Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.v.Harold W. LAFRENIERE, a/k/a Baretta, a/k/a Hal, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6817.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.Decided Nov. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge.  (CR-87-100-N)
Harold W. LaFreniere, appellant pro se.
Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Harold W. LaFreniere appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. LaFreniere, CR-87-100-N (E.D.Va. March 27, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED