Court Opinion

ID: 9406060
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-29 18:00:50.837591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:26.659390
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-60008   Document: 00516804289       Page: 1   Date Filed: 06/29/2023

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                              ___________                              FILED
                                                                    June 29, 2023
                               No. 22-60008
                                                                    Lyle W. Cayce
                              ___________
                                                                         Clerk

   Consumers’ Research; Cause Based Commerce,
   Incorporated; Kersten Conway; Suzanne Bettac;
   Robert Kull; Kwang Ja Kerby; Tom Kirby; Joseph Bayly;
   Jeremy Roth; Deanna Roth; Lynn Gibbs; Paul Gibbs;
   Rhonda Thomas,

                                                                Petitioners,

                                   versus

   Federal Communications Commission; United States of
   America,

                                                              Respondents.
                 ______________________________

                  Petition for Review from an Order of the
                      Federal Communications Comm
                              Agency No. 96-45
                 ______________________________

            ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

           (Opinion March 24, 2023 , 5 Cir., 2023, 63 F.4th 441 )

   Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
   Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
   Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas,
   Circuit Judges.
Case: 22-60008      Document: 00516804289           Page: 2    Date Filed: 06/29/2023

                                     No. 22-60008

   Per Curiam:
          A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
   rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
   and not disqualified having voted in favor,
          IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
   banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
   specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
   5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated March 24, 2023, is
   VACATED.

                                          2