Court Opinion

ID: 3116502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:42:08.258957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:09.021322
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                                      FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                                ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:                   01-13-00498-CV
Style:                          Willie Koehler
                                v. Reba Hankins and Amoco Federal Credit Union
Date motion filed*:             May 28, 2013
Type of motion:                 Motion for appointment of counsel
Party filing motion:            Appellant, pro se
Document to be filed:

Ordered that motion is:

                  Granted
                   If document is to be filed, document due                                                   ____________

                  Denied

                  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel in this case. See Gibson v. Tolbert,
102 S.W.3d 710, 712 (Tex. 2003); Mustapha v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n, No.
14-11-00112-CV, 2012 WL 273897, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 31,
2012, pet. Denied) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s motion is denied.

Judge's signature: __/s/ Sherry Radack_______________________________________
                Acting individually

Date: ___July 18, 2013____________________________

*
         Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for
         motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).
Note:    Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice
         should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion
         for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).