Court Opinion

ID: 8627257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 14:27:33.300192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:39.652052
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Mamadou Bailo Diallo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diallo v. Perreira, No. 8:07-cv-00348-AW (D. Md. June 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.