Court Opinion

ID: 9831612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:14:43.328685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:36.459909
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
This court feels obliged, upon consideration of appellant’s motion for rehearing, to adhere to the original disposition and the opinion thereon. The defects in and omissions from appellant’s brief, and pointed out in the original opinion, are sought to be cured and supplied in the motion for rehearing. But that effort comes too late. Parties are bound by and restricted to the presentation in their briefs. Any other rule would result in disorder, confusion, delays, the disruption of orderly procedure in this court. This is too obvious to require argument to support it. 3 Tex. Jur. §§ 658, 714; Neal v. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. Co., 37 Tex. Civ. App. 285, 83 S. W. 402; Peck v. Peck (Tex. Civ. App.) 83 S. W. 257; Hardin v. Palm (Tex. Civ. App.) 253 S. W. 948; McCreary v. Robinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S. W. 682; Bertram v. Reed Automobile Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 49 S.W.(2d) 517; Jones v. Clark (Tex. Civ. App.) 30 S.W.(2d) 577.
Appellant’s motion will be overruled.