Court Opinion

ID: 4726882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:52:29.487304+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:07:52.798821
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J. —
The appellant, as administrator of the estate of Young, deceased, collected $4,300 as damages from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company for causing the death of his decedent. In presenting his final account he claimed nothing as commission, but asked to be allowed $1,333.33 for money paid to himself as attorney for the heir in prosecuting and collecting the claim against the railroad company. The court disallowed the demand, but allowed the usual commissions.
*535The appellant made the collection and brought it into the estate by his report. We must, therefore, assume it to have been within the line of his duty to do all he did. The law fixes his fees for doing his duty, without anticipation that he will make agreements with heirs for additional compensation, as he claims to have done in this case. Such agreements ought certainly to be so far void that a court of probate would refuse to recognize them in the settlement of an administrator’s accounts. When a lawyer becomes a voluntary administrator, he takes the office cum, mere, and although he exercise professional skill in conducting the estate, he does not thereby entitle himself to additional compensation. Taylor v. Wright, 98 Ind. 121, Hough v. Harvey, 71 Ill. 72.
We concur in the action of the court below, and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Anders, C. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.