Court Opinion

ID: 4908058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-03 06:27:32.229046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:12.922810
License: Public Domain

In The

                               Court of Appeals

                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                              __________________

                              NO. 09-21-00194-CR
                              __________________

                 IN RE MICHAEL JOHN WILLIAMS
__________________________________________________________________

                           Original Proceeding
            9th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas
                    Trial Cause No. 17-11-14470-CR
__________________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      In a petition for writ of mandamus, Michael John Williams complains that the

Honorable Phil Grant failed “to correctly enter into the Judgment of Conviction the

exact offense for which the relator was indicted by the grand jury and which he was

convicted of.” After Williams filed his petition for writ of mandamus, we notified

him that his petition was defective, and we sent Williams a letter directing him to

correct the deficiencies in his petition. We also warned Williams that unless he

amended his petition and cured the defects we identified in the letter by July 12,

2021, we would dismiss his petition for mandamus relief.

                                        1
      Williams failed to amend his petition to cure the deficiencies. We therefore

dismiss Williams’s petition for writ of mandamus without reference to the merits of

his claims. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3.

      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                                   PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 31, 2021
Opinion Delivered September 1, 2021
Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                         2