Court Opinion

ID: 2704790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-04 20:31:29.216448+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:33:54.436702
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Jones v. McGinty, 2011-Ohio-1814.]

          Court of Appeals of Ohio
                                 EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

                                JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
                                         No. 96414

                                STATE OF OHIO EX REL.,
                                  CLIFFORD R. JONES
                                                                RELATOR

                                                      vs.

                       HONORABLE TIMOTHY McGINTY
                                                                RESPONDENT

                                            JUDGMENT:
                                            WRIT DENIED

                                            Writ of Mandamus
                                            Motion No. 442492
                                            Order No. 443294

RELEASE DATE: April 8, 2011
FOR RELATOR

Clifford R. Jones, Pro Se
Inmate No. 494-879
Marion Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 57
Marion, OH 43301

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

William D. Mason
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

By:    James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
8th Floor Justice Center
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113

MELODY J. STEWART, J.:

       {¶ 1} On February 11, 2011, the relator, Clifford Jones, commenced this mandamus

action to compel the respondent, Judge Timothy McGinty, to rule on a motion for jail time

credit in the underlying case, State v. Jones, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No.

CR-471452 and to grant him an additional 17 days of credit.        On March 4, 2011, the

respondent moved for summary judgment on the grounds of procedural defects and mootness.

 Attached to the dispositive motion was a certified copy of a March 2, 2011 journal entry in

the underlying case, granting Jones one additional day of credit.       This journal entry
establishes that the court has fulfilled its duty, to rule on the outstanding motion.         Beyond

this, Jones has or had an adequate remedy at law by appealing the ruling on the motion.
                                                                                                      1

State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson (1991), 68 Ohio App. 3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113.                 Moreover,

Jones never filed a response to the judge’s summary judgment motion.

       {¶ 2} The court further notes that the mandamus petition was also deficient in a

number of ways.        First, the relator failed to support his complaint with an affidavit

“specifying the details of the claim” as required by Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a).             State ex rel.

Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 123 Ohio St. 3d 124, 2009-Ohio-4688, 914
N.E.2d 402; State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese (Jan. 18, 1996), 8th Dist. No. 70077; and State

ex rel. Smith v. McMonagle (July 17, 1996), 8th Dist. No. 70899.              In Leon, the Supreme

Court of Ohio upheld this court’s ruling that merely stating in an affidavit that the complaint

was true and correct was insufficient to comply with the local rule.

       {¶ 3} Relator also did not comply with R.C. 2969.25(C) which requires that an inmate

file a certified statement from his prison cashier setting forth the balance in his private account

for each of the preceding six months.       This also is sufficient reason to deny the mandamus,

deny indigency status, and assess costs against the relator. State ex rel. Pamer v. Collier, 108

            The requisites for mandamus are well established: (1) the relator must have a clear legal
       1

right to the requested relief, (2) the respondent must have a clear legal duty to perform the requested
relief, and (3) there must be no adequate remedy at law. Additionally, although mandamus may be
used to compel a court to exercise judgment or to discharge a function, it may not control judicial
discretion, even if that discretion is grossly abused. State ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus (1987), 33 Ohio
St.3d 118, 515 N.E.2d 914.
Ohio St.3d 492, 2006-Ohio-1507, 844 N.E.2d 842 and State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Court of Common Pleas, 88 Ohio St. 3d 176, 2000-Ohio-285, 724 N.E.2d 420.

       {¶ 4} Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion for summary judgment

and dismisses this case.   Relator to pay costs.   The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.   Civ.R. 58(B).

       Writ denied.

MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, A.J., and
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR