Court Opinion

ID: 8273325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:39:19.020475+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:35.652549
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
This case tried at the same time as that of Kalleberg, administratrix, against the same defendant, No. 103 of the present term (ante p. 222) and depends on the same state of facts. For the reasons -given in the opinion of this court in that case, the judgment herein will be reversed, to the end that a venire de novo issue.
For affirmance — None'.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeheimer, Williams, JJ. 13.