Court Opinion

ID: 8604346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 01:56:08.761988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:14.419402
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jorge Alvarez-Marroquin appeals from his 188-month sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction by a jury for distributing methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Alvarez-Marroquin contends that the district court clearly erred in denying his request for a two-level mitigating role re*170duetion for being a minor participant in an offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, by failing to compare his conduct with the conduct of other participants in the offense, and instead finding only that he was an active participant. The district court did not clearly err in denying this request because the record reflects that AlvarezMarroquin was not “ ‘substantially’ less culpable than his co-participants” and his efforts were “integral to the successful completion of the drug transaction.” See United States v. Duran, 189 F.3d 1071, 1089 (9th Cir.1999). To the extent that Alvarez-Marroquin contends that the court mistakenly believed that an active participant is not entitled to a role reduction, we find no support for such a claim.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.