Court Opinion

ID: 9825320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:36:21.063808+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:50:42.962133
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
As stated in the foregoing opinion the four appellants were jointly indicted for robbery. They were jointly tried upon said indictment and the trial resulted in the conviction of all four of them, and from the judgment of conviction there was a joint appeal to this court.
Upon submission no brief was filed for either of the appellants. A purported application for rehearing in behalf of Albert Hollander, one of the appellants, was filed in this court on April 19, 1937, but said purported application cannot be considered because of noncompliance with provisions of Supreme Court Rule 38. . Said rule requires that application for rehearing must be filed with the clerk within 15 days after rendition of the judgment; and said application must be accompanied by brief for the appellant and a certificate of counsel that a copy of such brief has been delivered to opposing counsel within 15 days after rendition of the judgment. The rule also unqualifiedly provides that no application shall be received or filed which is not presented in strict compliance with this rule.
As a result of noncompliance with said rule, the application for rehearing is hereby stricken.
Application stricken.