Court Opinion

ID: 3731829
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:59:07.595278+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:09.809710
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).
We overrule the appellant's sole assignment of error, in which he challenges the balance struck by the jury in weighing the evidence before it, because we find nothing in the record of the proceedings below to suggest that the jury, in resolving the conflicts in the evidence, lost its way or created such a manifest miscarriage of justice as to warrant the reversal of the appellant's conviction. See Tibbs v. Florida (1982), 457 U.S. 31,102 S. Ct. 2211; State v. Martin (1983), 20 Ohio App. 3d 172,485 N.E.2d 717.
We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Gorman, P.J., Sundermann and Shannon, JJ.
Raymond E. Shannon, retired, from the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.