Court Opinion

ID: 9948580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-07 17:04:08.270823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:44.948592
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KEITH CAMPBELL,                         §
                                        §
       Defendant Below,                 § No. 7, 2024
       Appellant,                       §
                                        § Court Below: Superior Court
       v.                               § of the State of Delaware
                                        §
STATE OF DELAWARE,                      § Cr. ID No. 1411008699 (N)
                                        §
       Appellee.                        §

                          Submitted: February 27, 2024
                          Decided:   March 6, 2024

                                  ORDER

      (1)   The appellant filed this appeal from a Superior Court order denying a

motion for sentence correction. The Senior Court Clerk sent the appellant a letter

directing him to pay the filing fee or to file a motion and affidavit to proceed in

forma pauperis by January 23, 2024. On January 25, 2024, the Chief Deputy Clerk

sent another letter directing the appellant to either file a motion and affidavit to

proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee by February 8, 2024, or a notice to

show cause would issue.

      (2)   On February 13, 2024, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by

certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why the Court should not

dismiss the appeal for the appellant’s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by

either paying the Supreme Court filing fee or filing a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis. The notice to show cause directed the appellant to respond within ten days

and advised that if the appellant did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would be

deemed to be unopposed. On February 26, 2024, the Court received the certified-

mail receipt indicating that the notice had been delivered on February 15, 2024.

      (3)    The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause

within the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be

unopposed.

      NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

                                             BY THE COURT:

                                             /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
                                                  Chief Justice

                                         2