Court Opinion

ID: 8292100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 10:48:46.83253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:53.883944
License: Public Domain

Ness, Chief Justice
(dissenting):
I disagree with the majority, for the reasons set forth in my dissent in Taylor v. Murphy, et al., 293 S. C. 316, 360 S. E. (2d) 314 (1987). Appellant is entitled to pursue recovery under the South Carolina Governmental Motor Vehicle Tort Claims Act, S. C. Code Ann. Sections 15-7-210 through 250 (1976) (Repealed by 1986 Act No. 463, Section 2), since his cause of action accrued prior to July 1, 1986.