Court Opinion

ID: 9833588
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:51:18.476855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:04.633961
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellants and appellee, respectively, have-filed motions for rehearing. Among other matters, the appellee assails the holding of' the court with reference to order No. 37, and, apparently is under the impression that, by what was said in the original opinion, the-court was passing upon the particular items, involved or before the commissioners’ court-when that order was entered. The discussion i *788did not reach that point. In the original opinion the conclusion was reached that the court helow erred in overruling the plea in abatement. This necessitated a reversal of the case. Having so concluded, this court did not go into the discussion of any other propositions involved than certain matters of procedure which might arise on another trial.
The motion of appellants and that of ap-pellee are overruled.