Court Opinion

ID: 9745200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 22:41:11.294535+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:57.516493
License: Public Domain

McADAMS, J., Concurring.
I concur in the judgment.
I write separately because I do not join the analysis in the penultimate paragraph of the majority opinion distinguishing People v. Glee (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 99 [97 Cal.Rptr.2d 847]. I agree with my colleagues that under Glee, the reviewing court properly focused on whether the trial court intended to impose a felony sentence. In this case, the judge taking the plea clearly intended to impose a felony sentence and the sentencing judge did not indicate any disagreement with the first judge, in spite of the ambiguous language during sentencing. For this reason, following Glee, I would affirm the judgment.
Appellant’s petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied December 23, 2008, S167872. Werdegar, J., did not participate therein.