Court Opinion

ID: 991719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:40:54.716074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:48.874957
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-1455

SUSAN JEANETTE SMITH; DEBBIE MARCUS;      DAWN
SMITH, and others similarly situated,

                                          Plaintiffs - Appellants,

          versus

ROY BECK, d/b/a Twin Peaks,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-
96-258-3-19)

Submitted:   February 27, 1997            Decided:   March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying re-

lief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smith v. Beck, No. CA-96-258-3-19 (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2