Court Opinion

ID: 8480736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:49:23.473884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.218713
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gary Edward Nixon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nixon, No. 7:04-cr-00085-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2009). We deny Nixon’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with *40oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.