Court Opinion

ID: 9937708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:01:52.108445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:08.458176
License: Public Domain

My concern in addressing the trespass issue is to make sure that the present direction of the law is clear. Justice Beatty's opinion correctly states the present law of this state as developed in Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc., 293 Ala. 56,300 So.2d 94 (1974), and Borland v. Sanders Lead Co.,369 So.2d 523 (Ala. 1979). Accordingly, reliance on Cochran v. Hasty,378 So.2d 1131 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979), even though it was decided subsequent to Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., 369 So.2d 523 (Ala. 1979), is now inappropriate.