Court Opinion

ID: 1011960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:36:38.09402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:53.265445
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 03-6310

RODNEY M. LUNSFORD,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SCOTT WADE POWELL; SERGEANT SCOTT,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-490-5-BO)

Submitted:   November 6, 2003          Decided:     November 17, 2003

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney M. Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Mary S. Mercer, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rodney M. Lunsford appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.   See Lunsford v. Powell,

No. CA-02-490-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2