Court Opinion

ID: 5614396
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:12:21.226825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:12.389484
License: Public Domain

Broyles, C. J.
1. The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such probative value as to require a charge on the law of alibi, in the absence of a timely written request. Paulk v. State, 8 Ga. App. 704 (2) (70 S. E. 50), and citations.
2. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.