Court Opinion

ID: 7746702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:11:39.846281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:36.580552
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
As the State properly concedes, the appellant’s motion to clarify illegal sentence should be granted. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify the following: that the re-sentencing order is nunc pro tunc to the original sentencing date of May 18, 1996; that the sentence should include the sentence for count 7, the severed unlawful possession of a firearm conviction; that all sentences are to run concurrent; and that the appellant did not receive a habitual violent offender sentence as to count 3, the burglary conviction that was overturned on appeal.
Remanded with directions.