Court Opinion

ID: 8680210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:41:15.567374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.769200
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Rafael Zamora-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zamora has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Zamora’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein; and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2. Zamora’s untimely motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.