Court Opinion

ID: 8438340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:42:36.707269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.093392
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hartando Omar Carr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 728-29 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Carr, No. 5:96-cr-00020-H-l (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2009). We deny Carr’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.