Court Opinion

ID: 577926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:16:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:49.773570
License: Public Domain

956 F.2d 1163
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Jesse J. PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Charles THOMPSON;  Edward W. Murray;  Sergeant Moore;  D.Campbell;  R. Latiker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6145.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 23, 1991.Decided March 4, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.   Claude M. Hilton, District Judge.  (CA-90-467-AM)
Jesse J. Pritchard, Jr., appellant pro se.
Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Jesse J. Pritchard, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Pritchard v. Thompson, No. CA-90-467-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.