Court Opinion

ID: 591616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:44.104551
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 728
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Howard Nelson HALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6580.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 31, 1992Decided:  September 18, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville.  Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.  (CR-90-69-H, CA-92-28-3-H)
Howard Nelson Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Jane H. Jolly, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
Affirmed.
Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Howard Hall appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Hall, Nos.  CR-90-69-H, CA-92-28-3-H (E.D.N.C. May 18, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED