Court Opinion

ID: 9723800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 10:32:39.401246+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:52.097237
License: Public Domain

*467NEWSOM, J.
After the same searching and troubled consideration given this case by my colleagues, I concur in the judgment and in the reasoning which supports it, except that I do not endorse the majority’s implication that the trial court had a duty to advise counsel of the proper means of invoking Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6.
I may add that I do not see in what way Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 involves, or affects, the interests of justice.
A petition for a rehearing was denied February 27, 1980, and respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 27, 1980.