Court Opinion

ID: 3074886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:04:53.286795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:09.545450
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00580-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

FRANCISCO TAMEZ,                                                             Appellant,

                                            v.

TFHSP, L.L.C. SERIES 901,                           Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on January 12, 2015. On

January 20, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
12th day of February, 2015.

                                             2