Court Opinion

ID: 2905245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:56:01.523967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:23:39.293377
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-04-425 CV

____________________

LAMBERT WOODROW BROTEMARKLE, JR., Appellant

V.

DOLORESE CHARLYNE BROTEMARKLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 410th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 03-02-01211-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 On May 19, 2005, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 and 42.3.  The appellant did not respond to
the motion.  The appellant failed to file a brief or a motion for extension of time.  There
being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to timely file the brief, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 and 42.3.  Costs are assessed
against appellant.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								____________________________
									STEVE McKEITHEN
									      Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered August 25, 2005 
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.