Court Opinion

ID: 9831366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:01:35.289211+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:33.981814
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Appellant urgently insists that we erred in holding that defendant’s special charge No. 4 was properly refused, for the reason that every defensive issue therein submitted was sufficiently covered by the general charge No. 5, given at defendant’s request.
[11] We adhere to this ruling, but it may be well to say that it was properly refused for the further reason that it was argumentative; further, that to have given the same would have been an undue repetition of defensive issues submitted in the main charge and special charge No. 5.
Motion for rehearing is overruled.