Court Opinion

ID: 2920465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 01:23:52.220303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:05.722423
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-01-682-CR
 
                             COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                   THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                                CORPUS
CHRISTI
___________________________________________________________________
 
EDWARD RODRIGUEZ,                                                          Appellant,
 
                                                   v.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                        On
appeal from the 105th District Court
                                  of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
 
                                   O
P I N I O N
 
                   Before
Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
                                       Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant, Edward Rodriguez, perfected an appeal from a judgment
revoking community supervision.  The
trial court granted appellant=s motion for
reconsideration, and on October 9, 2001, entered an order setting aside judgment
of revocation and reinstating community supervision and imposing sanctions on
defendant.  We dismiss the appeal for
want of jurisdiction.
In Basaldua v. State, 558
S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that
a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation
with amended terms and conditions.  There
is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer
jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying
probationary conditions.  Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex.
R. App. P.
47.3.
Opinion delivered and
filed this
the 23rd day
of May, 2002.