Court Opinion

ID: 9447091
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 22:24:57.843262+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:53.484669
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing en Banc.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
 Petition for rehearing en banc is granted. This opinion is substituted for the per curiam opinion upon rehearing filed August 25, 1959. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purposes expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.