Court Opinion

ID: 2838587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-02 22:52:03.508802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:35:03.645207
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued March 31, 2005 

 
 

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-05-00281-CR
____________

IN RE KEVIN MICHAEL BREES, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

 
MEMORANDUM  OPINION
               Relator filed in this Court a pro se petition for writ of mandamus asking that
we order respondent
 to rule on pro se motions that he filed.
               Relator is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court.  Relator is not
entitled to hybrid representation.  Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623,
625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).  
               The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Alcala.
Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).