Court Opinion

ID: 1005976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:04:36.186802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.204106
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-7142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-93-10, CA-01-330-7)

Submitted:   November 29, 2001             Decided:   December 6, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se.      Ruth Elizabeth
Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Anif Christopher Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-93-10; CA-

01-330-7 (W.D. Va. May 4, 2001).     We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2