Court Opinion

ID: 9648001
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:58:32.481897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:55.233060
License: Public Domain

DEL SOLE, Judge,
concurring.
Upon review of the effect of the trial court’s ruling on the motion in limine which resulted in the exclusion of evidence relating to the benefits paid through worker’s compensation, I conclude that a proper result was achieved in accordance in 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1722 entitled “Preclusion of pleading, proving and recovering required benefits.” Because this *64evidence was not introduced, and because in my view it could not have been under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, I would find no need to discuss the applicability of the collateral source rule to this case.