Court Opinion

ID: 2865632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:57:20.087132+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:51.765379
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00654-CR

Ricky Joe Freeland, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 52,195, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING 

	Appellant Ricky Joe Freeland pleaded guilty to aggravated assault.  See Tex. Pen.
Code Ann. § 22.02(b)(3) (West 1994) (retaliation against witness or prospective witness).  At his
subsequent sentencing hearing, the court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment.
	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without
merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  Counsel's motion to
withdraw is granted.
	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed:   April 11, 2002
Do Not Publish