Court Opinion

ID: 2861028
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 20:59:19.998203+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:01.815336
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-95-00471-CR

James Harold Brown, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 95R-030, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

	The district court found appellant guilty of intentional injury to an elderly
individual.  The court assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at
imprisonment for fifty years and a $2000 fine.

	Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d
137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.

	We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.

	The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and Jones

Affirmed

Filed:   February 6, 1997

Do Not Publish