Court Opinion

ID: 8462727
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:34:04.653325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.695007
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Darnell Bernie Calloway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Calloway, No. 7:05-cr-00051-jct-1, 2008 WL 2552861 (W.D.Va. June 25, 2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 *229F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Callo-way’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.