Court Opinion

ID: 8477756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:40:31.908396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.071462
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United, States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.