Court Opinion

ID: 7959518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 00:30:43.01971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:23.261591
License: Public Domain

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., P.J.
(dissenting). I dissent for the reasons expressed in Kransz v Meredith, 123 Mich 454; 332 NW2d 571 (1983), and Allstate Ins Co v Frankenmuth Mutual Ins Co, 111 Mich App 617; 314 NW2d 711 (1981). As the Supreme Court in Welton v Carriers Ins Co, 421 Mich 571; 365 NW2d 170 (1984), carefully avoided determining whether Richards tolling is available under the statute, I see no reason to retreat from my position.