Court Opinion

ID: 4246904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-21 16:12:47.122964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:11.233836
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed February 21, 2018.
         Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               ________________

                               No. 3D17-1580
                         Lower Tribunal No. 16-14864
                             ________________

                             Gladys Carbonell,
                                    Appellant,

                                        vs.

                               WVUE 2015-1,
                                    Appellee.

     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Eric William
Hendon, Judge.

       American Justice, P.A., and Theresa B. Edwards and David F. Edwards
(Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

     Law Offices of Damian G. Waldman, P.A., and Farha Ahmed and Damian
G. Waldman (Largo), for appellee.

Before SCALES, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      The trial court entered summary judgment in this residential foreclosure case

in favor of the Appellee WVUE 2015-1. We reverse because the record reveals

that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding the amount that Appellant

Gladys Carbonell owed under the promissory note, Ottawa Properties 2 LLC v.

Central Mortgage Co., 202 So. 3d 102, 103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); and because at

the summary judgment hearing, the trial court was made aware that outstanding,

pending discovery on this issue had not concluded. Payne v. Cudjoe Gardens Prop.

Owners Ass’n, 837 So. 2d 458, 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).1

      Reversed and remanded.

1 Appellant also argues that outstanding discovery on the standing issue should
have precluded summary judgment. We agree with Appellee, though, that
Appellant’s outstanding discovery requests on the standing issue would not create
a disputed issue of material fact. Estate of Herrera v. Berlo Indus. Inc., 840 So. 2d
272, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Our de novo review of the summary judgment
record supports the trial court’s finding that Appellee established standing from the
inception of the lawsuit. McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So. 3d
170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

                                         2