Court Opinion

ID: 2671667
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-30 00:01:39.459514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:57.060592
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20259      Document: 00512609488         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/28/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
                                    No. 13-20259                               April 28, 2014
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                   Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONIDES CHAPA, also known as Leonides Vela Chapa, also known as Leon
Bella Chapa, also known as Leonides Bela Chapa, also known as Jaime Chapa,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:12-CR-715-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Leonides Chapa has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Chapa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chapa’s response. We concur

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20259    Document: 00512609488    Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/28/2014

                                No. 13-20259

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2