Court Opinion

ID: 3148633
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-22 20:01:16.999094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:36.492719
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-50467      Document: 00513242529         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/22/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 14-50467
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         October 22, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS ESPINOZA-MARTINEZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:09-CR-1164-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Espinoza-Martinez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011).     Espinoza-Martinez has filed a response.              We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Espinoza-Martinez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-50467   Document: 00513242529    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/22/2015

                               No. 14-50467

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

                                     2