Court Opinion

ID: 205782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-02 00:48:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:49.420364
License: Public Domain

FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           MAR 01 2011

                                                                     MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                         U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS

GEORGE BARTZ,                                  No. 09-36143

              Plaintiff - Appellant,           D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00272-CI
                                               Eastern District of Washington,
  v.                                           Spoµane

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT; et al.,
                                               ORDER
              Defendants - Appellees.

Before:      BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges

       We recall the mandate for the limited purpose of withdrawing the

memorandum disposition filed on January 21, 2011 and concurrently filing a

replacement memorandum disposition.

       The memorandum disposition filed on January 21, 2011 is withdrawn. A

replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

       The mandate shall reissue forthwith.
                                                                            FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 01 2011

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE BARTZ,                                     No. 09-36143

               Plaintiff - Appellant,             D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00272-CI

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT; et al.,

               Defendants - Appellees.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Washington
                      Lonny R. Suµo, Chief Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted January 10, 2011**

Before:        BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

       George Bartz, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court's judgment dismissing his action alleging that defendants deducted military

retirement benefits from his inmate trust account in violation of his constitutional

rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. y 1291. We review de novo a

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
dismissal under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. yy 1915(e) and 1915A for

failure to state a claim. Resnicµ v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000);

Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order).

      We vacate the judgment and remand to the district court with instructions to

appoint counsel and direct service of a second amended complaint on the named

defendant(s), so that defendant(s) may file a responsive pleading or motion.

      VACATED and REMANDED.

                                          2                                      09-36143