Court Opinion

ID: 4395355
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-09 16:00:33.762144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:06.323559
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

               ROBERT J. TROPIAK,
                Claimant-Appellant

                           v.

  ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
                  AFFAIRS,
             Respondent-Appellee
            ______________________

                      2018-1928
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 17-0676, Judge William S. Green-
berg.
                ______________________

                 Decided: May 9, 2019
                ______________________

    ADAM WILLIAM BURROWBRIDGE, Wilson, Sonsini,
Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for claim-
ant-appellant. Also represented by SONJA ROCHELLE
GERRARD, MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.

    REBECCA SARAH KRUSER, Commercial Litigation
Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Jus-
tice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee.
Also represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, MARTIN F. HOCKEY,
2                                           TROPIAK v. WILKIE

JR., ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.; CHRISTINA LYNN
GREGG, Y. KEN LEE, Office of General Counsel, United
States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.
               ______________________

    Before REYNA, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    Appellant Robert J. Tropiak appeals a decision of the
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirm-
ing the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision to deny Mr.
Tropiak a compensable rating for his foot condition under
Diagnostic Code 7806. Tropiak v. Shulkin, No. 17-0676,
2018 WL 1074703 (Vet. App. Feb. 28, 2018). We find that
Mr. Tropiak’s appeal raises only factual issues or issues of
application of law to fact. Because we lack jurisdiction to
review such issues, Cook v. Principi, 353 F.3d 937, 939
(Fed. Cir. 2003); see also 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), we dismiss.
                       DISMISSED
    No costs.