Court Opinion

ID: 1661797
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:03:29.979073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:26.196212
License: Public Domain

33 Mich. App. 15 (1971)
189 N.W.2d 851
PEOPLE
v.
JORDAN
Docket No. 7283.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided April 26, 1971.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Gerald S. Surowiec, for defendant on appeal.
Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and LEVIN and PETERSON,[*] JJ.
Leave to appeal applied for.
*16 PER CURIAM.
Defendant was charged with first-degree murder[1] in the fatal shooting of Kenneth Demarest on July 29, 1968. Defendant was allowed to plead guilty to the lesser included offense of manslaughter.[2] The court accepted the plea and sentenced defendant to serve 14 years and 11 months to 15 years in prison. From the conviction and sentence defendant brings this appeal.
None of defendant's three assignments of error requires reversal.
Defendant bases two of his allegations of error on the failure of the trial court to inform him of the consequences of his plea as required by GCR 1963, 785.3(2). Specifically, defendant complains that the trial court: (1) failed to specifically enumerate the three constitutional rights[3] which he waives by pleading guilty and (2) failed to inform him that he could be sent to prison. Defendant's reliance on Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 (89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. 2d 274), in this connection is misplaced. Boykin has been held not to oblige the court to enumerate the three Federal constitutional rights waived by a guilty plea. People v. Jaworski (1970), 25 Mich. App. 540.
As to defendant's second contention, a fair reading of the transcript indicates that the trial court did inform the defendant that he might be sent to prison.
Defendant had a long criminal record prior to this offense. In fact, he was serving a five-year term in Federal prison at the time of sentencing. Also, counsel was provided for him at his request. We are convinced that the defendant knowingly, freely, and voluntarily tendered his plea.
*17 Finally, defendant alleges that a minimum sentence of 14 years and 11 months, when the statutory maximum is 15 years, is not an indeterminate sentence as required by MCLA § 769.8 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1080). An appellate court will not ordinarily review claims that the trial court abused its discretion where the sentence imposed falls within the statutory limits. People v. Girard (1969), 18 Mich. App. 593; People v. Pate (1965), 2 Mich. App. 66; People v. Guillett (1955), 342 Mich. 1; People v. Wright (1968), 19 Mich. App. 242. Suffice it to say that the sentence in this case is within the statutory maximum.
Affirmed.
Judge LEVIN concurs in the affirmance of the conviction but would remand for resentencing for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in People v. Haggitt (1971), 33 Mich. App. 95, post.
NOTES
[*]  Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
[1]  MCLA § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548).
[2]  MCLA § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553).
[3]  Privilege against self-incrimination, right to trial by jury, and right to confront his accusers.