Court Opinion

ID: 2897526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:58:51.557496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:02.078784
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-07-0278-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 3, 2008
______________________________

VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY
AND DOUBLE S PETROLEUM, LTD., APPELLANTS

V.

SUPER CIRCLE 7 FOOD STORES, INC., APPELLEE
_________________________________

FROM THE 381ST DISTRICT COURT OF STARR COUNTY;

NO. DC-04-23; HONORABLE JOSE LUIS GARZA, JUDGE
_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	Appellant, Valero Marketing and Supply Company, filed a timely notice of appeal
from the trial court's Amended Final Judgment Confirming Arbitration Award executed on
July 25, 2007.  Valero has now filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to
Texas Rule of Appellant Procedure 42.1, asserting that Valero and the parties who
obtained a judgment against it have reached a settlement agreement regarding the matters
at issue in Valero's appeal.  This disposition is authorized by Rule 42.1 (a)(1) of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure and does not prevent other parties seeking relief.  Finding
the motion complies with the requirements of Rules 6.6 and 42.1(a) and (b), we shall
dismiss Valero's appeal and, as agreed by the parties reaching settlement with Valero,
assess costs to the parties who incurred them. 
	Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed but only as to appellant Valero Marketing and
Supply Company.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1a(1) and (b).  

								Per Curiam