Court Opinion

ID: 9789115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:28:17.374681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:19.649000
License: Public Domain

BUETTNER, J.,
specially concurring:
The trial court denied Loman's quest for life insurance proceeds in a well reasoned opinion. We might disagree that the effect of the December 4, 2008 order was to replace or modify the Automatic Temporary Injunetion, as contemplated by 48 0.8.2001 § (A)(8) and (5). However, the trial court held that even if changing beneficiaries was specifically prohibited, the only method for determining a penalty for such a violation would have been a citation for contempt filed prior to Deleon's death, and a retention of jurisdiction by the trial court in accordance with 43 0.8.2001 § 110(c).
I agree that under the facts of this case, Loman has failed to show that the change of beneficiary was void or voidable, and therefore she was not entitled to the relief requested.