Court Opinion

ID: 9587726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:25:41.678103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:56:46.756702
License: Public Domain

Barnes, Judge,
concurring specially.
Although I agree with the majority’s view of the broad powers and wide discretion of trial courts generally in these matters, I write *846separately to express my view that the trial court’s resolution of this dispute by directing Saks and Mendola to draft a confidentiality agreement for the documents in dispute was within the powers and discretion of the trial court in this case. Nevertheless, I also concur with the disposition of this case because the case must be returned to the trial court in any event.
Decided March 29, 2001.
Overtis H. Brantley, Vernitia A. Shannon, Rodney T Floyd, Brenda D. King, for appellant.
Webb, Tanner & Powell, Steven A. Pickens, Matthew P. Benson, for appellee.