Court Opinion

ID: 6515776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:26:31.342801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:01.203497
License: Public Domain

HEAD, J.
The only point made by the appellant in this case is, that the final certificate of incorporation issued by the Secretary of State to the Birmingham and Atlantic Railroad Company — the alleged owner of the house, the subject of the burglary — is not a paper required by law to be kept in the office of the Secretary of State, by reason whereof, it is contended, a copy, certified by that officer, is not admissible in evidence, under the influence of section 2785 of the Code. The company is alleged to have been incorporated under the general laws of this.State. Upon looking at the statute, we see the original declaration of incorporation made by the persons desiring to form the corporation, the written certified statement of the organization proceedings of the subscribers, and a verified list of the subscribers are required to be filed in the office of the Secretary of State ; and thereupon that officer must issue to the subscribers to the declaration, their associates and successors, a certificate of incorporation, under the seal of the State, stating that they are duly organized as a corporation under the name and style designated in the declaration, having the powers, capacity and authority conferred by law; and it is provided that thereafter such corporation must be deemed duly' organized. — Code, § 1578. The statute then provides : ‘ ‘After the issue of the certificate of incorporation, the Secretary of State must record, consecutively, the declaration, the proceedings of the meeting of subscribers, as certified by the judge of probate, the verified list of the subscribers and the affidavit thereto, and the certificate of incorporation. — Code, § *611579. Then, section 2785, supra, provides, that, “All transcripts of books or papers required by law to be kept in the office of the Secretary of State, or the office of the Auditor, when certified by the proper custodian thereof, must be received in evidence in all courts.” This statute is remedial in its nature, and was intended to dispense with the troublesome and often impracticable requirement of the production of original papers, records of which are kept in these offices. The statute, in terms, makes transcripts of books kept there admissible whether the original papers are there or not. Indeed, it would seem to apply with more force, if possible, to the end of admitting transcripts from the records, when the original papers are elsewhere, than when they also are in the custody of that officer.
Affirmed.