Court Opinion

ID: 622169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-04 01:05:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:55.036269
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 11-7530

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

JASMINE ROCHELLS ROBESON,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.    Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00140-GCM-2)

Submitted:   January 31, 2012             Decided:   February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jasmine Rochells Robeson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Jasmine Rochells Robeson appeals the district court’s

order denying her motions for reduction of sentence.                We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.             Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.               United

States v. Robeson, No. 3:02-cr-00140-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19,

2011).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions   are   adequately   presented    in   the    materials

before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                    2