Court Opinion

ID: 9444712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 21:09:55.554201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:58.740276
License: Public Domain

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
I fully concur in the opinion of the Court. However, there is a caveat. In Bustos-Ovalle v. Landon, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 878, the Court said: in certain instances “habeas corpus has been judicially denied and the Board of Immigration Appeals has thereafter granted a stay of deportation. This is improper and points up the necessity of some showing that the administrative remedies have been exhausted.” The reference was to the subsequent proceedings after our determination in Schoeps v. Carmichael, supra. If the administrative is not m earnest in these deportations, but is to nullify the decisions of the Courts by clement erosion, the petitioners in such instances should be forthwith released from custody judicially by granting the Great Writ.