Court Opinion

ID: 8415795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 15:56:51.122912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:15.306739
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
John Marvin Overman, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing two defendants from his civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Carp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Overman seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.