Court Opinion

ID: 8684162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 07:02:23.452347+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:33.418118
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *  The attorney appointed to represent Melissa Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Trevino has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Trevino’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court, has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.