Court Opinion

ID: 1697909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:09:24.562891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:54.269099
License: Public Domain

995 So.2d 575 (2008)
Juan Leal ESQUIVEL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D07-2591.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 15, 2008.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 19, 2008.
*576 Juan Leal Esquivel, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, WELLS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
ROTHENBERG, J.
The defendant, Juan Leal Esquivel ("Esquivel"), appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because we conclude that the record provided on appeal does not conclusively refute Esquivel's claims numbered 29, 30, 32, and 40, we reverse as to those four claims, with instructions to the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing as to those claims, or if the trial court again denies relief as to these claims in a subsequent order, to attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute Esquivel's entitlement to relief.
As to the remaining claims raised in Esquivel's motion for postconviction relief, because we find that these claims are either procedurally barred because they could have been or were raised on direct appeal, see § 924.051(5), Fla. Stat. (2003); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c); Byrd v. State, 597 So.2d 252 (Fla.1992) (holding that postconviction relief cannot be based on grounds that were or could have been raised on direct appeal), or they were conclusively refuted by the record, we affirm.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded with instructions.