Court Opinion

ID: 2757894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-12-05 05:07:39.262198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:32:57.347237
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                                 FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                          ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number:             01-14-00843-CV
Style:                    Raymond Espinosa
                           v J. Norris, et al.
Date motion filed*:       November 20, 2014
                          Motion to Abate and Remand to Ascertain Trial Court’s Reason for
Type of motion:           Summary Judgment
Party filing motion:      Appellant
Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated?       No

Ordered that motion is:

             Granted
              If document is to be filed, document due:
                      The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
             Denied
             Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
             Other: _____________________________________
         The motion is denied. See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. S.S., 858 S.W.2d 374, 380
         (Tex. 1993); Rogers v. Ricane Enters., Inc., 772 S.W.2d 76, 79 (Tex. 1989); Scott v.
         Papasozomenos, No. 01-13-00932-CV, 2014 WL 4952436, at *2 (Tex. App.—
         Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 2, 2014, no pet. h.) (mem. op.); see also Wilson v. Jordan
         Mem’l Church of God, No. 01-03-00844-CV, 2004 WL 253503, at *1 (Tex. App.—
         Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack
                 Acting individually

Date: December 4, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision