Court Opinion

ID: 9770843
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 16:22:55.424025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:21.230865
License: Public Domain

WALKER, Justice.
Both parties have filed motions for rehearing. These motions have been considered and both are overruled. We adhere to our original conclusions. We think that the grease caused plaintiff’s fall, and that if defendant was to be held liable for negligence, this negligence must have concerned the grease. The defendant assuredly owed plaintiff a duty to provide plaintiff with such' assistance as the safe performance of the task made necessary, but -the *352breach of this duty had nothing to do> with plaintiff’s fall.
Parts of the original opinion have been rewritten and the entire original opinion, as rewritten and amended, is to be considered a part of the opinion filed by this Court in adjudicating the motions for rehearing.