Court Opinion

ID: 802121
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-12 19:18:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:02.830581
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Rodrigo Gonzalez appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the court’s conclusion that Gonzalez failed to demonstrate that discrimination on account of Gonzalez’s religion was a motivating factor in his termination. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of that claim for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   *
  

   Gonzalez v. Hogg Ins.
  
 
   *342
   

   Group, Inc.,
  
  No. 1:11-cv-00147-AJT-IDD, 2012 WL 48013 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 6, 2012 & entered Jan. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai'gument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   Because Gonzalez’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition of his remaining claims, Gonzalez has forfeited appellate review of those claims.
   
    See
   
   4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting review to issues raised in informal appellate brief).