Court Opinion

ID: 8156171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:41:56.108821+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:36.811719
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question: (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission of California, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52, 54.