Court Opinion

ID: 8437314
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:04:16.218422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:44.682927
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Reynolds, No. 6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.