Court Opinion

ID: 997785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:01:53.918596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:08.037725
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REGINALD DAVIS, a/k/a Sinbad, a/k/a Reggie,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-93-25, CA-97-382-R)

Submitted:   November 17, 1998         Decided:     February 10, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Davis, Appellant Pro Se.     Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Reginald Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-93-25; CA-

97-382-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2