Court Opinion

ID: 1876043
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:41:46.469889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:08.466675
License: Public Domain

260 S.W.3d 904 (2008)
Walter A. TOMICH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90437.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
September 2, 2008.
Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Walter Tomich ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of Movant's three claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).