Court Opinion

ID: 4280699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-02 04:48:56.558863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:39.617387
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-17-00238-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CORLES ANDRE GILES,                                                         Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.

                     On appeal from the 24th District Court
                          of Jackson County, Texas.

                          ORDER OF ABATEMENT
              Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa
                              Order Per Curiam
         Appellant Corles Andre Giles was convicted of possession of more than four but

less than 400 grams of synthetic marijuana with intent to deliver, a first-degree felony.

See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.113(d) (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st

C.S.).    His appointed counsel, J. Esequiel Ramos Jr., filed a notice of appeal, an

appellant’s brief, and two amended appellant’s briefs. Appellant has now filed a pro se
letter with this Court stating that Ramos has been suspended from the practice of law

pursuant to a petition filed by the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline.

Appellant asks that we abate the appeal for the appointment of new counsel because

Ramos’s brief contains “a bunch of careless mistakes” and “need[s to be] corrected.”

       Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d). Accordingly, we hereby ABATE the

appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with

this order.   Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-

appointed attorney should remain as appellant’s counsel; and, if not, whether appellant

is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason

to discharge appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the

court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel

should be appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state

bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record

to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the

date of this order.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                                PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
31st day of May, 2018.

                                             2