Court Opinion

ID: 9964250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-29 16:00:57.037964+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:16.827841
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 24-1209
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                     Jessie Ivory, also known as Jesse Holliday

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                        ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                   ____________

                              Submitted: April 24, 2024
                                Filed: April 29, 2024
                                    [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Jessie Ivory appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and
sentenced him to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing Guidelines

      1
       The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging
the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

       We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no
indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant
weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment.
See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (considerations for
reasonableness of sentence); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.
2009) (sentence within Guidelines range presumptively reasonable).

      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.
                     ______________________________

                                          -2-