Court Opinion

ID: 13485
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 06:27:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:00.595745
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                  For the Fifth Circuit

             _____________________________

                      No. 96-50667
             ______________________________

In the Matter of: BILLY R SHURLEY; JANE BRYANT SHURLEY,

                                                    Debtors.

   --------------------------------------------------

         BILLY R. SHURLEY; JANE BRYANT SHURLEY,

                               Appellees-Cross Appellants,

                         VERSUS

       TEXAS COMMERCE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

                                  Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

                      No. 96-50681

In the Matter of: BILLY R. SHURLEY; JANE BRYANT SHURLEY,

                                                      Debtors.

  ----------------------------------------------------

        BILLY R. SHURLEY; JANE BRYANT SHURLEY,

                                                    Appellees,

                         VERSUS
      TEXAS COMMERCE BANK - SAN ANGELO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

                                                                   Appellant.

           Appeals from the United States District Court
                 For the Western District of Texas
                       (M0-95-CV-293 & M0-96-CV-45)
                                 November 17, 1997
Before KING, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

      It is ordered that the August 29, 1996 order of the district

court be VACATED, and the cause REMANDED to the district court.

The district court is instructed to REMAND the causes to the

Bankruptcy     Court   for   a    determination   of   the   solvency   of   the

bankruptcy estate in light of Shurley v. Texas Commerce Bank--

Austin, N.A., 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), petition for cert.

filed, No. 97-567 (U.S. Sept. 30, 1997).

  *
   Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

                                         2