Court Opinion

ID: 9763307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 02:40:36.269817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:40.814547
License: Public Domain

OPINION TO DENYING APPELLANT LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
TEAGUE, Judge,
dissenting.
Appellant correctly asserts in his motion for leave to file motion for rehearing, and motion for rehearing, that he was not only relying upon provisions of the Federal Constitution in support of his claim that the marihuana which was seized in this cause should not have been admitted into evidence, but also was relying upon Art. 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution.
Appellant’s motion for leave to file his motion for rehearing should be granted because this Court has not yet discussed his contention that because of Art. 1, Sec. 9 of the Texas Constitution, the marihuana became inadmissible evidence.
Because the majority of this Court does not see fit to grant appellant leave to file his motion for rehearing, I must respectfully dissent.
CLINTON and MILLER, JJ., join.