Court Opinion

ID: 4283752
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-12 20:01:37.845351+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:08.377401
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 16-1504V
                                     Filed: March 22, 2018
                                         UNPUBLISHED

    ANTHONY D. MADDOX,
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                        Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Uncontested;
    v.                                                       Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu)
                                                             Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  (GBS)
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.

Randall G. Knutson, Knutson & Casey Law Firm, Mankato, MN, for petitioner.
Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
       On November 14, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a
result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 25, 2013. Petition at 1.
The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
        On March 21, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he states that
he does not contest that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner has
satisfied the criteria set forth in the newly revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the
Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”)” and that “the evidence shows that

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
petitioner suffered GBS following the administration of a seasonal flu vaccine, and that
the onset occurred within the time period specified in the Table.” Id. at 7. Respondent
further states that “[r]ecognizing that petitioner may re-file this petition and be afforded a
presumption of causation under the revised Table (see 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-16(b)),
respondent will not contest entitlement to compensation in this case”. Id. at 7-8.

     In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                    Nora Beth Dorsey
                                    Chief Special Master

                                              2