Court Opinion

ID: 9461801
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 22:25:05.898672+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:37:16.432973
License: Public Domain

*61SPRECHER, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
The court en bane has let stand the original panel decision affirming the convictions on Counts I, II, VIII and IX and reversing the convictions on Counts IV, V, VI and VII. United States v. Staszcuk, 502 F.2d 875 (7th Cir. 1974).
Count III, which the panel reversed, has now been affirmed by a majority of the en banc court. Inasmuch as the original opinion will retain viability in regard to eight counts, no purpose would be served by repeating the reasons stated therein for originally reversing Count III.
Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the en banc affirmance of Count III on the grounds set forth in 502 F.2d at 879 and would reverse that Count.