Court Opinion

ID: 2865990
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 01:02:16.756878+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:55.269279
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00473-CR

Tracy Dwayne Hennig, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 50,360, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Tracy Dwayne Hennig was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after pleading guilty to burglary of a habitation.  See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West
Supp. 2002).  Eight months later, the court revoked supervision, adjudicated guilt, and imposed
sentence of six years' imprisonment after appellant admitted numerous violations of supervisory
conditions.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  Counsel's
motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson
Affirmed
Filed:   January 17, 2002
Do Not Publish