Court Opinion

ID: 988771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:57:29.084352+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.313955
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7156

DOUGLAS B. SEIBERT,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. T. DONNELLY, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-94-596)

Submitted:   February 29, 1996            Decided:   March 19, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas B. Seibert, Appellant Pro Se.     Jack L. Gould, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Seibert v. Donnelly, No. CA-94-596 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2