Court Opinion

ID: 4668862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-17 19:08:44.082607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:16.753868
License: Public Domain

People v Kinsler (2021 NY Slip Op 08248)

People v Kinsler

2021 NY Slip Op 08248

Decided on March 17, 2021

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 17, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-09081

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vDerrick Kinsler, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 10137/18)

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J., at plea; Eugene M. Guarino, J., at sentence), imposed June 25, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court