Court Opinion

ID: 7822451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:59:25.213182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:46.291373
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam. In this criminal case the petitioner’s convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals on June 22, 1983. Petitioner wished to seek a review by this court, but his attorney, Carol Hewett, mistakenly thought that the time limit for filing a petition for review is 30 days instead of the 17 days allowed by Rule 29. Petitioner now seeks permission to file a belated petition for review. His attorney has filed a letter assuming full responsibility for the mistake. The petition is therefore granted, and a period of 17 days is allowed for the filing of the petition for review. A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See our per curiam order, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).