Court Opinion

ID: 9382338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-27 08:09:00.101127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:38.714439
License: Public Domain

In the
            Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
             at Fort Worth
           ___________________________
                No. 02-22-00403-CV
           ___________________________

SARA E. BINION AND WENDY M. BINION, Appellants

                            V.

     ELIZABETH VALENCIA ALLEN, Appellee

         On Appeal from the 89th District Court
                 Wichita County, Texas
          Trial Court No. DC89-CV2022-1635

     Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
           Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

       On February 2, 2023, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed

as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellants filed

with the court an appellants’ brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining

the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P.

10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

       Because appellants have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

                                                        Per Curiam

Delivered: March 23, 2023

                                            2