Court Opinion

ID: 995059
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:31:48.858992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:33.624228
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6271

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

           versus

TIMOTHY   WILLIAM BARTLETT, a/k/a Harold C.
Eller,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-94-87, CA-96-953-1)

Submitted:   April 29, 1998                  Decided:   May 18, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy William Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Mebane,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-94-87; CA-96-953-1
(M.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2