Court Opinion

ID: 9910562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-15 21:00:38.104048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:15.362518
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7081      Doc: 10         Filed: 12/14/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-7081

        PETER GEORGE LIOUNIS,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
        Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00201-JPB-JPM)

        Submitted: October 26, 2023                                 Decided: December 14, 2023

        Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Peter George Liounis, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7081         Doc: 10      Filed: 12/14/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Peter George Liounis appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of subject

        matter jurisdiction his civil action seeking relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28

        U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.         Liounis v. United States, No.

        5:22-cv-00201-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 8, 2022); see Clendening v. United States, 19

        F.4th 421, 432, 434-36 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing discretionary function exception), cert.

        denied, 143 S. Ct. 11 (2022). We also deny Liounis’ motion to supplement his informal

        brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2