Court Opinion

ID: 8915860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 04:59:59.540417+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:58.684788
License: Public Domain

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Senior
District Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent in part to the majority opinion. I feel that the question of the constitutionality of both 104(a) and (b) was squarely before the district court and there was error for the district court not to rule on both. Even though the district court did not certify his ruling under Rule 54(b), I think it should have been so certified and it is before this court. I would hold both 104(a) and (b) unconstitutional and concur in the rest of the majority opinion.