Court Opinion

ID: 998090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:06:03.422499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:03.561475
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7324

ALFREDO SIMPSON,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden of the Federal Correc-
tional Institute at Petersburg, Virginia;
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-269-5-BR)

Submitted:   February 25, 1999             Decided:   March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfredo Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alfredo Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See Simpson v. DeWalt, No. CA-98-269-5-BR (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 17, 1998).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2