Court Opinion

ID: 1001481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:56:19.107639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:04.408669
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-6016

EMMANUEL WILLIAMS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

S. COLLINS; MS. BETHIA; JAMES N. KIMBALL;
DOCTOR SANCHEZ; DIANE HENDERSON; JOHN DOE,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-574-5-F)

Submitted:   April 27, 2000                   Decided:   May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Emmanuel Williams appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Williams v. Collins, No. CA-99-574-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2