Court Opinion

ID: 1005062
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:51:01.649825+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:19.433566
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LEROY ANTHONY THOMAS,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting
by designation. (CR-98-111-HNM, CA-00-3317-HNM)

Submitted:   August 9, 2001                 Decided:   August 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Anthony Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. James Clarke Howard, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Leroy Anthony Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Thomas, Nos. CR-98-111-

HNM; CA-00-3317-HNM (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2001).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2