Court Opinion

ID: 2549384
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:19:22.879495+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:34.936639
License: Public Domain

81 So.3d 613 (2012)
Juan FEBRES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D10-372.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 7, 2012.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and, Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WELLS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, J., concur.
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge (dissenting).
In my view, the confession which was the most significant aspect of the prosecution's case, should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful, non-consensual confinement, that is, an arrest, which was not supported by probable cause. See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983), affirming Royer v. State, 389 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Ladson v. State, 63 So.3d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (Schwartz, Senior J. dissenting); B.S. v. State, 548 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Taylor v. State, 355 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).