Court Opinion

ID: 3199197
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-29 17:12:36.093492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:01.830588
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                           TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                  No. 10-15-00413-CR

                       EX PARTE JAMES RAY BROSSETT

                            From the 54th District Court
                             McLennan County, Texas
                           Trial Court No. 2015-1932-C2A

            CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

       This case presents the problem when an appellate court determines the amount of

bail set by the trial court is excessive and then proceeds to set bail. If the trial court had

set bail in this case at $1,000,000, I would not hold that was an abuse of discretion. The

trial court set bail at $5,000,000. I agree with the Court that $5,000,000 is excessive. The

State conceded that $5,000,000 was effectively the denial of bail but that the State had not

sought the total denial of bail as it otherwise might have been able to do. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts 17.152 and 17.153 (West 2005).

       But having determined bail was excessive, the Court then proceeds to set bail in

an amount it determines is appropriate. We do not review this amount. This Court
determines the amount. As for me, I do not understand why we, as an appellate court,

should in the first instance set the amount of bail we think is appropriate. All we have is

a cold record before us. I would much prefer a remand to allow the trial court to set the

amount and conditions of bail it deems appropriate and leave this Court to review the

trial court’s order. See Ex parte Hicks, 262 S.W.3d 387 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, no pet.)

(Gray, C.J, dissenting note); Ex parte Mayfield, No. 10-07-00304-CR, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS

9758 (App.—Waco 2007, no pet.) (Gray, C.J., dissenting note); Ex parte Davis, 147 S.W.3d
546, 554 n. 1 (Tex. App.—Waco 2004, no pet.) (Gray, C.J., dissenting).

        Furthermore, I find it interesting that we set one aspect of bail, the amount, but

remand to the trial court for a determination of the conditions of bail. These conditions

of bail could impact the appropriateness of the amount of bail.

        Moreover, if I am compelled by Court of Criminal Appeals precedent to set bail in

the first instance rather than review the amount determined by a trial court, in this

proceeding I would set bail at no more than $750,000. That amount appears adequate to

assure Brossett’s presence at trial; particularly if it is accompanied with other conditions

of bail such as his surrender of all, and a prohibition from obtaining additional, firearms,

knives, and other weapons, surrender of Brossett’s passport, if any, a prohibition from

any contact with the surviving victims, all being the children of the deceased victim, and

an order to wear a GPS tracking device to assure that Brossett does not go within 1,250

yards of them.

Ex parte Brossett                                                                     Page 2
        Thus, I must concur in part and dissent in part to the Court’s judgment.

                                          TOM GRAY
                                          Chief Justice

Concurring and dissenting opinion delivered and filed April 28, 2016
Publish

Ex parte Brossett                                                                  Page 3