Court Opinion

ID: 4394044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-03 23:41:59.841565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:08.647023
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals

                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                               __________________

                               NO. 09-19-00133-CV
                               __________________

                    IN RE TATIANA TELEGINA
__________________________________________________________________

                         Original Proceeding
        County Court at Law No. 3 of Montgomery County, Texas
                   Trial Cause No. 17-11-14052-CV
__________________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Tatiana Telegina complains that the trial court clearly abused its discretion by

granting temporary protective orders that effectively limited discovery to: the

validity of the parties’ marital settlement agreement and Telegina’s claims that the

real party in interest, Vladimir Nechayuk, violated the terms of the agreement; and

claims for partition of undivided marital assets. Additionally, Telegina complains

that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her motion for sanctions.

      A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only to correct

a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal.

                                          1
See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding). After considering the petitions, as supplemented, and examining the

exhibits contained in the appendices, we conclude that Telegina has not established

that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

      PETITION DENIED.

                                                          PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 1, 2019
Opinion Delivered May 2, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                         2