Court Opinion

ID: 1001616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:58:14.21367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:19.856327
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6442

JERMAINE A. BOLLING,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-99-3810-JFM)

Submitted:   May 11, 2000                   Decided:   May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine A. Bolling, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Jason Frederick Trumpbour,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jermaine A. Bolling seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See Bolling v. Conroy, No. CA-99-

3810-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 24, 2000).     We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2