Court Opinion

ID: 9832839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:14:21.856783+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:53.673553
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
This motion sets up no new matter except a statement verified by appellant’s attorney to the effect that the attorney who made the supporting affidavit to the motion to strike out the statement of facts and bill of exceptions agreed to both of those documents before they were filed. We regard the controversy between the attorneys as immaterial, because, if it be conceded that appellee or his attorney saw the bill of exceptions and approved it before it was filed, it is nevertheless invalid because not approved by the trial judge until after the time allowed by law for such approval. As held in the original opinion, the judge could not delegate authority to anyone else to approve either the statement of facts or' bill of exceptions.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.