Court Opinion

ID: 9729222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 14:29:28.518972+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:56.162171
License: Public Domain

EVANS, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the result and agree that a question of fact exists as to the nature of the contract between defendants, Claude C. Wood Company and Grupe Development Company. The facts presented do not indicate what possessory rights defendant Wood had.
I dissent from that portion of the opinion that holds a licensee entitled to possession of land upon which an accident involving injury results is not entitled to the protection of Civil Code section 846.1 base my dissent upon the reasons previously stated in my dissent in Darr v. Lone Star Industries, Inc. (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 895 [157 Cal.Rptr. 90].
A petition for a rehearing was denied November 20, 1979. Evans, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.