Court Opinion

ID: 4037019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-26 09:14:30.840366+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:52.592735
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-16-00237-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

              IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.O., A CHILD
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 36th District Court
                 of San Patricio County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant’s brief in this accelerated parental termination case was originally due

on August 18, 2016. On August 25, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that

his brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want

of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten

days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and
the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

To date, no response has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

                                                                       PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
22nd day of September, 2016.

                                             2