Court Opinion

ID: 9686891
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 16:10:52.553994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:22.803612
License: Public Domain

R. M. Maher, P.J.
(concurring). I concur in the result reached by the majority and in the reasoning of Issue II. However, I would find that plaintiff is entitled to recover no-fault benefits because he was injured while alighting from the vehicle and the requisite causal connection between the vehicle and the injury was established, MCL 500.3105; MSA 24.13105, MCL 500.3106; MSA 24.13106, see Shinabarger v Citizens Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 307; — NW2d — (1979).