Court Opinion

ID: 9764640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 03:34:15.981412+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:59.305590
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing
Appellants’ motion for rehearing has ■been considered and is overruled.
Appellants have directed our attention to the fact that in Cause No. 4338 O. H. Gay dismissed his cross action. However, the copy of the docket sheet from which this statement is taken contains the entry that Gay “stands on his plea of not guilty,” and Mrs. Davis’ title to all of the land sued for by her was thus in issue between her and Mr. Gay.
Whether the proof adduced in No. 4338 fully supports the judgment actually rendered in that cause is not material here, since that judgment became final and was never set aside.