Court Opinion

ID: 8453231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:27:27.112514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.597395
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barkley Gardner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gardner v. Williamson, Nos. 4:95-cr-00041-H-8; 5:08-cv-02050-H (E.D.N.C., Oct. 13, 2011; June 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.