Court Opinion

ID: 6321899
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-10 17:00:32.240715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:30.708396
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 21-2602
                        ___________________________

                                Thomas D. Sailors

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

  Maxwell Hubka, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1655, in his individual capacity;
  Cole Jennings, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1650, in his individual capacity;
  Daniel Keyes, Special Administrator of the Estate of Paul Keyes, US Marshal
#3483, in his individual capacity; United States of America; United States Marshal
                                      Service

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                      for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: March 7, 2022
                             Filed: March 10, 2022
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Nebraska resident Thomas Sailors appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment on his excessive-force and Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
claims. We affirm the grant of summary judgment. See Greer v. St. Louis Reg’l
Med. Ctr., 258 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir. 2001). As to the excessive-force claim, we
agree with the district court that Marshal Keyes’s use of force was not objectively
unreasonable. See Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 11-12 (1985); Tatum v.
Robinson, 858 F.3d 544, 547 (8th Cir. 2017); Molina-Gomes v. Welinski, 676 F.3d
1149 (8th Cir. 2012). As to the FTCA claims, we agree with the district court that the
United States was not liable on the battery claim, as Marshal Keyes’s use of force was
justified under Nebraska law. See Millbrook v. United States, 569 U.S. 50, 52-53
(2013); Eubank v. Kan. City Power & Light Co., 626 F.3d 424, 427 (8th Cir. 2010);
see also Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-1410, 28-1412. We also agree with the district court
that the negligent supervision and training claim was derivative of the battery claim,
see Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese, 508 N.W.2d 907, 913 (Neb. 1993), and
conclude that the record does not support a negligence claim based on Marshal
Keyes’s discharge of his personal firearm, see Zeller v. County of Howard, 419
N.W.2d 654, 657 (Neb. 1988).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.

                                         -2-