Court Opinion

ID: 6042033
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 13:55:40.043947+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:15.636638
License: Public Domain

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), both rendered November 5, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, under Indictment No. 18/97, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, driving while intoxicated, vehicular assault in the second degree and leaving the scene of an accident without reporting, under Indictment No. 62/97, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Initially, we note that the defendant never moved to withdraw his plea of guilty under Indictment No. 62/97 or his Alford plea (see, North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25) under Indictment No. 18/97. Thus, his present contention that these pleas were coerced is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, our review of the record demonstrates that the defendant’s pleas were voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; see also, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Stephens, 188 AD2d 345). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann- and H. Miller, JJ., concur.