Court Opinion

ID: 1001587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:57:57.91232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:40:18.723082
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CURTIS LEE WATSON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-88-201, CA-00-112-A)

Submitted:   May 11, 2000                   Decided:   May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Orin Samuel Kerr, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

       Curtis Lee Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.     See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-88-201;

CA-00-112-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2000).        We dispense with oral argu-

ment   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are   adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                      2