Court Opinion

ID: 1001146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:51:17.684118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.684446
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7446

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CHARLES MCINTYRE BAUCOM,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District
Judge. (CR-98-49, CA-99-397-2)

Submitted:   February 8, 2000             Decided:   March 22, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles McIntyre Baucom, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Mark Salsbury,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

       Charles McIntyre Baucom seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.      See United States v. Baucom, Nos. CR-98-49;

CA-99-397-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1999).         We dispense with oral argu-

ment   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are   adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                      2