Court Opinion

ID: 5922886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:37:04.946563+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:28.665850
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), all rendered January 23, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1526/86, robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1560/86, robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1625/86, robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1628/86, and robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 1629/86, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen*520dant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Rubin, Hooper and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.