Court Opinion

ID: 1026435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:06:22.699855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:28.592626
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 08-6639

PAUL H. NOE,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

R. L. MCFADDEN; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; WADE NOBLES;
S. HAYWOOD; KIM WHITE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COE; NURSE
CHAPMAN; DOCTOR PHILIP; COUNSELOR FORD; LIEUTENANT DODSON,

                Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03139-D)

Submitted:   July 31, 2008                 Decided:   August 11, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul H. Noe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Paul H. Noe seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing some, but not all, of his claims raised in his complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).        This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).     The order Noe seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.    Accordingly,   we   dismiss   the   appeal   for   lack   of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                             DISMISSED

                               - 2 -