Court Opinion

ID: 8829973
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 16:00:05.549551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:54.001194
License: Public Domain

HAZEL, District Judge.
The judgment was not entered herein without authority of law, even though the term at which the verdict was rendered had expired. Under the state law a party in whose favor a general verdict is rendered may thereafter, in term or vacation, enter judgment on the verdict without the consent of the court. In this respect the clerk performs a clerical act and evidences the prior decision of the court or finding of the jury. Freeman on Judgments, § 38, p. 61; section 39a, Id. The practice of this court as to entry of judgments is controlled by the state law, and thus must conform thereto as near as may be. Black on Judgments, § 125a. See also In re Watts, 214 Fed. 80, 130 C. C. A. 520, where District Court was required by mandamus to enter judgment on verdict after expiration of<term. This court has no power to set aside the judgment, the rendition of which is set out in the minutes of the clerk, and, moreover, the judgment has been appealed from and the writ of error dismissed.
Motion denied.