Court Opinion

ID: 9645569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:28:32.8129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:05:28.411307
License: Public Domain

BURDOCK, Justice,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
Appellee is entitled to the reasonable value of the storage it provided. There is no requirement that the cost of the storage be paid to a third party. Appellants’ sixth point of error should be overruled.
The correct measure of damages should be the contract price, plus reasonable storage and other costs, less the amount paid and the fair market value at time of breach of the chairs not accepted.
Even accepting the holding of the majority, in the interest of justice, the cause should be remanded for a new trial.
HOPKINS, J., joins.