Court Opinion

ID: 1003939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:33:59.551591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:29.482482
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6103

LESTER BARNETT, JR.,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

BOB SMITH, Superintendent; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-95-421-3-MU)

Submitted:   March 22, 2001                 Decided:   March 30, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lester Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See Barnett v. Smith, No. CA-95-421-

3-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2000).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2