Court Opinion

ID: 1005473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:57:05.19711+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:35.979048
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  David L. Hodge, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his
  
   term of
  
  imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Hodge,
  
  No. CR-94-36 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.