Court Opinion

ID: 8673162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:46:15.182049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.490299
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Delton Scott Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1, 2008 WL 2330225 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.