Court Opinion

ID: 5755359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:05:28.098156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:24.221209
License: Public Domain

Aulisi, J.
Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the County Court of the County of St. Lawrence entered March 1, 1963, on a jury verdict finding the defendant guilty of the crimes of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law, § 404), petit larceny (Penal Law, § 1298) and malicious injury to property (Penal Law, § 1433). The defendant attacks', the conviction upon the grounds (1) that he was denied due process when his case was passed and went over the October 1962 Term while he was not present in court; (2) that he was denied a speedy trial; (3)' that the court committed error in admitting into evidenc a statement alleged to be his confession together with the testimony of police officers who interrogated him; (4) that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence; and (5) that the sentence imposed is excessive and should be reduced. We withheld determination of the appeal, remitted the case to the trial court (22 A D 2d 490) for further proceedings consistent with the decision in People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) and concluded that under the circumstances the defendant was not prejudiced by not being present in court at the October 1962 Term, nor that he was denied a speedy trial. Upon an examination of the entire record and the findings and conclusions of the trial court as to the voluntariness of the confession which is now before us, we find that the record here contains ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury and we see no reason to disturb it. The defendant had a fair trial, the ease was submitted to the jury upon a clear and comprehensive charge and the sentence is not excessive. Judgment affirmed. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.