Court Opinion

ID: 2922149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:53:00.807484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:06.973928
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-05-00530-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________
                                                                
                         IN RE
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
_______________________________________________________

 
                      On Petition for Writ of
Mandamus
 _______________________________________________________

                                       
MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
Before
Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez 
Per
Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
 
Relator, Chevron U.S.A.,
Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on August 18, 2005.  The Court requested
a response from the real parties in interest, and such response was filed on
September 29, 2005. 
The Court, having
examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and response is
of the opinion that relator has not shown itself
entitled to the relief sought. 
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 52.8(a).

 
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 5th day of
October, 2005.                                

[1]
See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum
opinions).