Court Opinion

ID: 9363500
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-16 00:11:45.755557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:32.180991
License: Public Domain

Order filed January 10, 2023.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                                  ____________

                              NO. 14-21-00741-CV
                                  ____________

                      CHAD FENLEY DAVIS, Appellant

                                       V.

    DAVID CLARKE RUSHING, ATTORNEY, AND DAVID CLARKE
        RUSHING D/B/A THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID RUSHING,
                            Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 234th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 2017-15972

                                  ORDER

      On December 30, 2022, this court ordered a supplemental clerk’s record
containing “Supplemented Response to Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Answer to
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment” (including all exhibits and attachments) filed on
July 26, 2021.

      On January 10, 2023, this court received a supplemental clerk’s record that
erroneously contained a different document that was filed on the same date as the
document identified in the order. The erroneous document was similarly entitled
“Supplemented Response to Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’
Motion to Strike the Expert Designation of Anton Paul Hajek III.”

       The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s
record on or before January 17, 2023, containing “Supplemented Response to
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment”
(including all exhibits and attachments) filed on July 26, 2021 (and not the
erroneous document identified above).

       If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to
file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted
item is not a part of the case file.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.