Court Opinion

ID: 9832076
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:35:58.39927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:41.782886
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellees, Mr. and Mrs. A. D. Doan, have filed their motion for a rehearing in this cause, and have therein directed our attention to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Red River National Bank v. J. E. Ferguson et al., 206 S. W. 923, wherein that court announced a contrary holding to so much of the original opinion in this case as holds that the amended statute (Acts 33d Leg. 1913, p. 61) recognized to the fullest extent that the wife has the power and capacity to contract debts, except such as she is specifically forbidden to contract under the express terms of .said statute.
In deference to such holding of the Supreme Court we withdraw that part of the original opinion above mentioned as being in conflict .with the holding of the Supreme Court; but, believing that the original opinion otherwise properly disposes of the appeal, we overrule the motion for rehearing.
Overruled.