Court Opinion

ID: 7874821
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:04:14.514796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:54:36.706824
License: Public Domain

Syllabus by the Court
Where there is no record of defendant's waiver of counsel it is impossible to determine on review that such waiver was knowing and intelligent.
 OPINION
Appellant, Ronald Edwards, appeals his conviction by jury of obstructing legal process, a misdemeanor. We reverse and remand.
Appellant appeared pro se. There is no record of his waiver of counsel.
 ISSUE
Was defendant denied a fair trial where he was unrepresented and there is no record of waiver of counsel?
 ANALYSIS
The trial court, relying on Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367,99 S.Ct. 1158, 59 L.Ed.2d 383 (1979), held that even though Edwards did not effectively waive his right to counsel, his constitutional rights were *Page 91 
not violated because incarceration was not imposed upon his conviction.
The trial court's reliance on Scott is misplaced because that case dealt with a defendant's right to counsel, rather than the validity of a defendant's conviction in the absence of a record of waiver of counsel, which is at issue here.
Minn.R.Crim.P. 5.02, subd. 2, provides that,
 Unless the defendant charged with a misdemeanor punishable upon conviction by incarceration voluntarily waives counsel in writing or on the record, the court shall appoint counsel for him if he appears without counsel * * *
(Emphasis added.)
The rule further provides that the court shall not accept the waiver unless the court is satisfied that it is voluntary and has been made by the defendant with full knowledge and understanding of his rights. Those rights requiring full understanding before a plea is entered in a misdemeanor case are specified in Minn.R.Crim.P. 15.02.
 DECISION
Since there is no record, it is impossible to determine on review that such waiver was knowing and intelligent. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial.