Court Opinion

ID: 3661548
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:12:55.289705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:32.784945
License: Public Domain

The demurrer raises the question whether the jurisdiction of a court of equity can be invoked to compel a sheriff who has sold land under an execution (the judgment, and execution, and sale being in all respects regular) to execute a deed to the purchaser, who offers and has always been ready to pay the purchase money; in other words, to compel a sheriff to dohis duty. This has hitherto been considered the exclusive function of the court under whose authority he acted in making the sale. We are at a loss to conceive under what head of *Page 416 equity this jurisdiction is supposed to be embraced, in the absence of an argument in support of the equity, or of any reference to a precedent for the exercise of the jurisdiction. The purchaser has a plain, and an adequate, and a speedy remedy at law, by putting the sheriff under a rule.
We can see no special ground for the interference of this Court. It is true, the bill alleges that after the sale, and in fraud of it, the execution continued to be issued, the sheriff having made no return of the sale, and thereupon a second sale was made by the new sheriff, at which sale the old sheriff, one of the defendants in this case, became the (634) purchaser. But there is no allegation that a deed has been executed to the defendant Carr, the old sheriff. We are inclined to the opinion that if a deed had been executed to him by the new sheriff, in completion of the second sale, that would have been a ground for coming into this Court; for thereby the title would have passed to him as anindividual, which might have rendered it impossible for him to comply with a rule of the court out of which the execution issued, to make title, under his power of sale as sheriff, to the plaintiff; and thereby made it necessary to convert him into a trustee, holding the legal title, on the ground that he had acquired it by fraud.
But there is no allegation that there was a deed to him. So he has not acquired the legal title, and there is no ground for equity to assume jurisdiction in order to convert him into a trustee.
Demurrer sustained, and bill dismissed with costs.
Cited: Skinner v. Warren, 81 N.C. 376; Fox v. Kline, 85 N.C. 177.