Court Opinion

ID: 1009581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:58:18.908015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:04.681347
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6637

JAMES E. LANDRUM,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

W. F. DALIUS, Warden,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-160-5-BO)

Submitted:   January 16, 2003              Decided:   January 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Landrum, Appellant Pro Se.    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James E. Landrum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000).   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Landrum v. Dalius, No. CA-02-160-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed

Mar. 14, 2002; entered Mar. 15, 2002).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2