Court Opinion

ID: 9516347
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 23:40:55.114906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:43.167620
License: Public Domain

Gribbs, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I agree with the opinion of Judge Smolenski in all respects but one. I agree with the conclusion reached. I write separately to indicate that, in my view, this Court reached the correct result in Adams v Perry Furniture Co (On Remand), 198 Mich App 1; 497 NW2d 514 (1993). I agree with the holding in Adams that the defendant did not breach its duty to the plaintiff. The Adams opinion thoroughly and persuasively analyzed the most recent opinion by the Michigan Supreme Court (among others) and correctly affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for the defendant of the plaintiffs claim of negligent design. Glittenberg v Doughboy Recreational Industries (On Rehearing), 441 Mich 379; 491 NW2d 208 (1992). See also Glittenberg v Doughboy Recreational Industries, Inc, 436 Mich 673; 462 NW2d 348 (1990).
I would affirm, without reservation, the summary disposition for defendant Bic Corporation with regard to all the issues._