Court Opinion

ID: 8677956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:21:24.718494+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.684080
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wanda Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting her leave to amend her complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Ciy.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Scott' seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Scott’s motion to recuse. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *669adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.