Court Opinion

ID: 685950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:44.819880
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1467
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Leonard J. LANKAS, Petitioner,v.DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UnitedStates Department Of Labor;  Buffalo MiningCompany, Respondents.
No. 94-1576.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 10, 1994.Decided Nov. 29, 1994.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.  (93-2313-BLA)
Leonard J. Lankas, petitioner pro se.
Christian P. Barber, Barry H. Joyner, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.;   Douglas Allan Smoot, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, WV, for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994).  Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.  Lankas v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 93-2313-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 19, 1994).*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 We note that even if Lankas had successfully established the presence of a totally disabling respiratory impairment, the record is devoid of evidence which could prove that this impairment was due to pneumoconiosis.  The absence of such evidence precludes entitlement.   See Robinson v. Pickands Mather & Co., 914 F.2d 35, 37-38 (4th Cir.1990)