Court Opinion

ID: 4522802
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-04-06 17:00:50.752275+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:38.524955
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-12020   Date Filed: 04/06/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-12020
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 4:17-cr-00195-WTM-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

DARYL JACKSON,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                             (April 6, 2020)

Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-12020     Date Filed: 04/06/2020   Page: 2 of 2

      Reginald Martin, appointed counsel for Daryl Jackson in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2