Court Opinion

ID: 1000659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:44:04.2081+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:46.676865
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LEONARD EDWIN THOMAS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-96-
381, CA-98-75-L)

Submitted:   January 13, 2000             Decided:   January 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Edwin Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Leonard Edwin Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Thomas, Nos. CR-96-

381; CA-98-75-L (D. Md. Aug. 16, 1999).     We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2