Court Opinion

ID: 9841284
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-21 20:01:04.343941+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:36.074031
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        SEP 21 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 23-841
                                                D.C. No.
             Plaintiff - Appellee,              2:11-cr-00151-WFN-1
                                                Eastern District of Washington,
 v.
                                                Spokane
LEONA LOUISE SUTTON,                            MEMORANDUM*

             Defendant - Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Eastern District of Washington
                 Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted September 12, 2023**

Before:      CANBY, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

      Leona Louise Sutton appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the six-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of her

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

      Sutton contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the nature of her supervision violation and her mitigating circumstances. We

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence, to be followed by

no further supervision, is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall, 552 at

51.

      AFFIRMED.

                                         2                                      23-841