Court Opinion

ID: 2951736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 21:53:53.317472+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:35.730542
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00003-CV

Luke Thomas Kaspar, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 09-1269-CC1, HONORABLE SUZANNE BROOKS, JUDGE PRESIDING

D I S S E N T I N G   O P I N I O N

		I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Texas
Department of Public Safety v. Caruana, No. 03-08-00659-CV, 2010 WL 522783 (Tex.
App.--Austin Feb. 12, 2010, pet. filed) (mem. op.)--namely, that I do not believe an administrative
law judge abuses his or her discretion in admitting an "unsworn" officer's report into evidence at an
administrative license revocation/suspension hearing.
		Although the facts of the present case are substantially similar to those in Caruana,
there is one notable but ultimately immaterial difference.  In Caruana, the officer who authored the
report testified at the hearing; here, the officer did not testify.  Thus, the section of my dissent in
Caruana labeled "Officer Flores's Testimony Bolsters the Report's Authenticity and Credibility"
does not apply in the present case.  The presence or absence of the officer's testimony is immaterial,
however, because the basis of my dissent in Caruana and my objection to the majority's opinion here
turn on an interpretation of the applicable rules and statutes. (1)
		With the one difference noted above, I reurge my dissent in Caruana here.  See
Caruana, 2010 WL 522783, at *6-11 (Jones, C.J., dissenting).  I would affirm the trial court's
judgment affirming the administrative suspension of Kaspar's license.

						__________________________________________
						J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Filed:   August 31, 2010
1.   I also note that the SOAH rule governing the report's admissibility as a public record in
a license revocation/suspension hearing has been recodified from title one, section 159.23(c)(7) of
the Texas Administrative Code to title one, section 159.211(c)(2).  See 1 Tex. Admin. Code
§ 159.211 (2010) (State Office of Admin. Hearings, Hearings); 1 Tex. Admin. Code § 159.23(c)(7)
(2008) (State Office of Admin. Hearings, Hearings), repealed by 34 Tex. Reg. 329 (2009).  The
pertinent part of the rule was copied verbatim and has not otherwise been materially altered.