Court Opinion

ID: 7799917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-11 20:00:29.75693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:29:00.776815
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40838     Document: 00516428336         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/11/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                        August 11, 2022
                                  No. 21-40838                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Francisco Javier Lapop,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 2:20-CR-904-1

   Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Duncan and Oldham, Circuit
   Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Javier Lapop has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40838     Document: 00516428336          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/11/2022

                                   No. 21-40838

   (5th Cir. 2011). Lapop has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2