Court Opinion

ID: 8181962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 22:53:35.634613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:40:14.188263
License: Public Domain

STARCHER, Justice,
dissenting:
(Filed July 20, 2000)
This per curiam opinion is most decidedly not authority for anyone to conclude that the previous practice (pre-1990) of awarding up to a year’s seniority for “substitutes” who worked 133 days or more in a year’s teaching employment is in conflict with the then-applicable law.
A settled line of cases before the State Employee Grievance Board, a state superintendent’s interpretation, and this Court’s decision in Harkins v. Ohio County Board of Education, 179 W.Va. 373, 369 S.E.2d 224 (1988) {per curiam) dictates this conclusion, as does a review of the applicable statutory language.
On remand, the Administrative Law Judge should follow the law, not dicta in a per curiam footnote. Then the Administrative Law Judge’s analysis may be tested in an appeal of the issue, if a party challenges it. Meanwhile, no one should presume to interfere with the hard-earned seniority of our state’s full-time teachers — whether they are called “substitutes” or otherwise.