Court Opinion

ID: 601040
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:23:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:06.783806
License: Public Domain

986 F.2d 1416
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Burrell Vann MOORE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-7239.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 1, 1993Decided:  February 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern.  Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.  (CR-89-28-4-BO, CA-92-116-4-BO)
Burrell Vann Moore, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Burrell Vann Moore, Sr., appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Moore, Nos.  CR-89-28-4-BO, CA-92-116-4BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED