Court Opinion

ID: 3490855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 21:59:20.49384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:14:16.324412
License: Public Domain

This case was submitted upon the same testimony taken in the case of Kathan v. Stevenson, 307 Mich. 485. The relief sought is to enforce a claimed reciprocal negative easement respecting property adjoining the property involved in that case, barring use and occupancy by persons of African *Page 220 
descent. For reasons similar to those recited in the opinion of Mr. Justice WIEST, the trial judge found that there never had been any restrictions limiting the use and occupancy of these premises to persons of the Caucasian race either placed on record, in any deeds of conveyance, or adopted by general plan by or among the persons interested in properties on Arden Park that were binding upon owners and future purchasers without notice; and that there was no actual notice to defendants that these parcels could not be used and occupied by them as their residences. In accordance with that finding the trial judge by his decree dismissed the bill.
In Kathan v. Stevenson, supra, at p. 490 this Court said:
"There was no plan or agreement common to all home owners in the subdivision relative to racial use and occupancy of premises."
The finding by the trial judge is determined to be correct. The decree appealed from is affirmed. The appellees not having filed a brief, no costs are allowed.
NORTH, C.J., and STARR, WIEST, BUTZEL, SHARPE, and BOYLES, JJ., concurred. BUSHNELL, J., did not sit. *Page 221