Court Opinion

ID: 7422371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:43:46.421614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:21.578421
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December IS, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has 'been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is denied. The petition for attorney’s fees filed by cross-petitioner Martin is granted in the amount of $250.00.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.