Court Opinion

ID: 2782758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-26 22:01:00.382809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:01.832950
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                           FEB 26 2015

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 13-30324

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 6:12-cr-00007-CCL

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM*
JOSHUA EMIL RUNION,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Montana
                    Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted February 17, 2015**

Before:        O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

       Joshua Emil Runion appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 51-month sentence for counterfeiting

obligations or securities of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Runion’s counsel has filed

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided Runion the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

         AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    13-30324