Court Opinion

ID: 7465059
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:34:30.060611+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:50.083921
License: Public Domain

PEARSON, Judge
(dissenting).
It is my view that because the default judgment against GACL, Inc. confessed the complaint of Zeger alleging active negligence that active negligence is res judica-ta as to the appellant GACL, Inc. See Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926). I would therefore affirm upon the authority of the rule applied in Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Fellows, Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 45.