Court Opinion

ID: 8671132
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 22:39:19.480932+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:20.184939
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Rolando Tobar-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Aln/cn-*192darez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *192published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.