Court Opinion

ID: 9740729
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:41:02.508544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:20.035529
License: Public Domain

KIRSCH, Judge,
concurring.
I concur with the majority in all respects. I write separately only to note that our deci*1044sion is mandated by the century-old holding in Woodruff v. Bowen (1893), 136 Ind. 431, 34 N.E. 1113. In Burrell v. Meads (1991), Ind., 569 N.E.2d 637, our supreme court took a significant step toward modernizing the law of premises lability in Indiana. The instant case presents the opportunity to take another such step.