Court Opinion

ID: 2735410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-20 01:17:49.755612+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:34.062162
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-13-00747-CR

                           Ryan Christopher Wickerham, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

        FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
       NO. 12-02207-1, THE HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Appellant Ryan Christopher Wickerham has filed a pro se motion to dismiss this

appeal.1 We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

                                              __________________________________________
                                              Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 19, 2014

Do Not Publish

       1
          Appellant appeals, pro se, his conviction for family-violence assault. See Tex. Penal Code
§ 22.01(a)(1); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.013. The record reflects that appellant chose to
represent himself at trial and continues to do so on appeal, despite repeated admonishments from the
trial court prior to trial and prior to this appeal of the dangers and disadvantages of
self-representation. See U.S. Const. amend. VI, XIV; Tex. Const. art. I, § 10; Faretta v. California,
422 U.S. 806 (1975).