Court Opinion

ID: 539536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:47.128272
License: Public Domain

900 F.2d 255Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Robert Francis SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY;  William P. Rogers;  Larry W. Huffman;L.M. Saunders, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6850.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Jan. 25, 1990.Decided:  March 23, 1990.Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied July 3, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-101-R)
Robert Francis Smith, Jr., appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Robert Francis Smith, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Smith v. Murray, CA-89-101-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 5, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED