Court Opinion

ID: 5593265
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 02:22:18.675631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:31.899740
License: Public Domain

Hawkins, Justice.
The evidence fáiling to show that the land described in the plaintiff’s action of ejectment is located in land lot No. 39, to which lot she introduced a chain of paper title, or that she and her predecessors in title had actual, adverse, and exclusive possession of the land for a period of twenty years, so as to establish prescriptive title, or acts and declarations of adjoining owners for seven years or more establishing a boundary line by acquiescence, the trial judge did not err in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.