Court Opinion

ID: 5187423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 15:30:43.906824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:48.100433
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
The order of interpleader in this case was improperly made. It appears that the plaintiff and one McLean claimed from the defendant moneys in its hands arising from the same source, and the defendant alleges that it is unable to determine to which of the claimants it can with safety pay those moneys. The plaintiff claims a certain amount, but the defendant admits indebtedness to one or the other of the claimants of a less amount. It has offered to deposit in court the lesser sum, and that being so it cannot be discharged from this action. A part of the plaintiff’s demand is still unprovided for, and the controversy between him and the defendant cannot be ended. There is still left a balance of the plaintiff’s claim. This order in effect compels the plaintiff to abandon that part of his claim.
The order must be reversed, with' ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an interpleader denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Van Beünt, P. J., Baeeett, Rumsey, Pattebson and McLaughlin, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.