Court Opinion

ID: 9483681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 09:28:49.530104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:49:46.992446
License: Public Domain

ORDER ON REHEARING
Dec. 15, 1992.
Appellant petitions for a rehearing of this court’s October 14, 1992, order which affirmed the judgment for appellees in this ERISA action.
After careful consideration, the panel concludes that it acted under no misapprehension of law or fact in issuing its order. Fed.R.App.P. 40(a). There is no factual basis for application of estoppel in this case. Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award statutory damages for any technical failure to comport with ERISA’s reporting requirements.
Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied.