Court Opinion

ID: 3679429
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:25:10.673021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:41.667010
License: Public Domain

said it seemed to him the answer should have stated the sums advanced, that the Court might judge from thence whether the consideration were adequate or unconscionable; and he refused to dissolve the injunction. The authorities cited for the complainant were 2 C. Digest, Chancery 4 D. 3; 4 D. 4; 4 D. 5; 4 D. 7; 4 D. 10; 4 ed., p. 665, 666, 668, 669.
Cited: McLean v. McLean, 84 N.C. 371.