Court Opinion

ID: 4328233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-06 16:00:34.676584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:05:32.475396
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

        UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE,
                   Petitioner

                            v.

              OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
                     Respondent

    UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE LABOR
                 COMMITTEE,
                   Intervenor
             ______________________

      2017-2060, 2017-2062, 2017-2063, 2017-2064
               ______________________

    Petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Direc-
tors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 16-LM-03 (NG),
16-LM-04 (NG), 16-LM-05 (NG), 16-LM-06 (NG).
                  ______________________

               Decided: November 6, 2018
                ______________________

     FREDERICK M. HERRERA, Office of Employment Coun-
sel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued
for petitioner.    Also represented by RAFIQUE OMAR
ANDERSON, KELLY MARISSA SCINDIAN.

   JOHN D. UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel,
2                                    US CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC

United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC,
argued for respondent. Also represented by JULIA AKINS
CLARK.

   MEGAN KATHLEEN MECHAK, Woodley & McGillivary
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
               ______________________

     Before DYK, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    The petitions for review are dismissed for lack of ju-
risdiction in this court. See U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of
Compliance, Nos. 2017-2061, 2018-1504, slip op. at 8–12
(Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2018).
    No costs.
                       DISMISSED