Court Opinion

ID: 6318372
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-01 16:00:45.481286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:59.666111
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-12484      Date Filed: 03/01/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-12484
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR HUGO CASTILLO VALLEJO,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Middle District of Florida
           D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00002-PGB-EJK-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12484         Date Filed: 03/01/2022    Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                 21-12484

Before WILSON, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
        Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Victor Castillo Val-
lejo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur-
ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vallejo’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.