Court Opinion

ID: 2965123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:35:44.245174+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:04.305588
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 97-1740

                                    HERTZL  SINAI,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              GABRIEL O. DUMONT, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                 Lynch, Circuit Judge,
                                        _____________
                        Bownes and Cyr, Senior Circuit Judges.
                                        _____________________
                                 ____________________

            Hertzl Sinai on brief pro se.
            ____________

                                 ____________________

                                  February 12, 1998
                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.   Pro se  plaintiff  Herzl Sinai  appeals a
                 ___________    ___ __

            district  court order  that dismissed  his  complaint on  the

            ground that it has no arguable basis in law under 28 U.S.C.  

            1915(e).  This  court has thoroughly reviewed  the record and

            Sinai's brief  on appeal.   We agree  that the  complaint was

            properly  dismissed, for the  reasons stated by  the district

            court.   Accordingly, the  judgment of the  district court is

            summarily affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                      ________   ___

                                         -2-