Court Opinion

ID: 2670526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-19 00:01:12.074003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:10.452048
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20590      Document: 00512600243         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/17/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 13-20590                       United States Court of Appeals

                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                          April 17, 2014

MAURICE MITCHELL,                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

THOMAS O. REYNOLDS, Sergeant; AQUISHA GUIDRY, Grievance
Coordinator II; O’MYRA MONTEZ; ALETHEA NORTH-WILLIAMS,
Correctional Officer IV,

                                                 Defendants-Appellees

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:13-CV-708

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Plaintiff-Appellant Maurice Mitchell, Texas prisoner # 648121, appeals
the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as
barred by the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). As he did below,
Mitchell challenges the district court’s assignment of a strike for the dismissal

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20590     Document: 00512600243      Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/17/2014

                                  No. 13-20590

as frivolous of the complaint in Jackson v. Garner, No. 96-cv-130 (E.D. Tex.
Oct. 9, 1996). Mitchell asserts that he was not a plaintiff in that case.
      The district court’s docket sheet in Jackson confirms that Mitchell was
in fact one of the prisoner-plaintiffs and, more specifically, that his complaint
was dismissed as frivolous. The district court thus properly concluded that the
dismissal counted as a strike for purposes of § 1915(g).         See Adepegba v.
Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). The strikes assigned to Mitchell
based on the dismissal of a prior state-court civil lawsuit, however, should not
have counted. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 451, 1915(g). Accordingly, the district court’s
judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
      We note that, after filing the instant lawsuit, Mitchell accrued two
additional strikes for the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 lawsuit and
our dismissal of his appeal as frivolous in Mitchell v. Henderson, No. 13-20262,
2013 WL 6659745 (5th Cir. Dec. 18, 2013) (unpublished).            See Adepegba,
103 F.3d at 387. Although he had not accumulated three strikes at the time
that he filed the instant suit, Mitchell has now done so. Consequently, Mitchell
is warned that he will be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any
future civil actions filed while he is incarcerated, absent a showing that he is
in imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g). Mitchell is also
cautioned that any future frivolous or repetitive filings in this court or any
court subject to our jurisdiction will subject him to additional sanctions, as will
his failure to withdraw any pending matters that are frivolous, repetitive, or
otherwise abusive.
      VACATED AND REMANDED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED;
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.

                                        2