Court Opinion

ID: 9607225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 02:56:30.514837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:08.181254
License: Public Domain

Eberhardt, Judge,
concurring specially. Since it appears from the allegations of the petition that plaintiff was in an un*513protected area alongside the track when he was injured, it must be concluded, as was held in Tatum v. Clemones, 105 Ga. App. 221 (124 SE2d 425), that “with a knowledge of the dangers inherent to one occupying such a position [he] assumed the risk of injury, and the trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant [s]’ general demurrer [s].”
I am authorized to state that Judge Jordan concurs in this view.