Court Opinion

ID: 5113788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 18:10:25.343542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:43.990068
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George White (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing because his plea counsel was ineffective for unreasonably failing to *525present mitigating evidence to the court during sentencing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).