Court Opinion

ID: 5959613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 06:52:07.082687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:04.344467
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered November 30, 2010, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By decision and order of this Court dated May 8, 2012, the matter was remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, to hear and determine the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim (see People v Graves, 95 AD3d 1034 [2012]). The County Court has now submitted its report. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 26, 2013, the motion of Carl D. Birman for leave to withdraw as counsel was granted and Richard L. Herzfeld was assigned to serve and file a supplemental brief, if he be so advised, regarding the hearing on the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and the new determination by the County Court, Westchester County, of that motion. Richard L. Herzfeld has submitted a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
*651Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In a decision and order dated May 8, 2012, this Court determined that the defendant’s right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a position adverse to him on his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. We therefore remitted the matter to the County Court, Westchester County, for the appointment of new counsel, followed by a hearing on the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and a new determination of the motion thereafter (see People v Graves, 95 AD3d 1034 [2012]). The County Court now reports that it appointed new counsel for the defendant, held a hearing on his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, and denied the motion.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the supplemental brief filed by Richard L. Herzfeld pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Richard L. Herzfeld’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.