Court Opinion

ID: 9930069
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-06 01:00:47.320057+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:50:24.994994
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10642         Document: 00517055962             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/05/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10642
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                               February 5, 2024
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Mena Jabeen,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:23-CR-28-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Mena Jabeen has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Jabeen has submitted an out-of-time response. We construe this document
   as moving for leave to file an out-of-time response, and we GRANT the

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10642     Document: 00517055962           Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/05/2024

                                    No. 23-10642

   motion. Accordingly, we have considered Jabeen’s response. The record is
   not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Jabeen’s
   claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider
   the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,
   739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Jabeen’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2