Court Opinion

ID: 8677998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:22:51.184896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.710063
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Terril Monteiz Duckett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Duckett has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec*212ord reflected therein, as well as Duckett s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motions made by Duckett in his response are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.