Court Opinion

ID: 5713398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:57:16.948791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:34.366833
License: Public Domain

In an action by the vendees named in a contract for the purchase and sale of real property for specific performance, the vendor named in said contract interposed a counterclaim for rents collected by the vendees. The appeal is from so much of an order as denied the vendees’ motion for summary judg*961ment striking out the answer and counterclaim (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.