Court Opinion

ID: 802714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-20 19:13:29+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:05.227603
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Booker Travis Law, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Law,
  
  No. 4:07-cr-00640-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.