Court Opinion

ID: 996308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:49:07.735593+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:04.248662
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6900

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EDRICK GOUDELOCK,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-96-327, CA-98-696)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edrick Goudelock, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United
States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   United   States   v.   Goudelock,   Nos.   CR-96-327;   CA-98-696

(D.S.C. May 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                 DISMISSED

                                     2