Court Opinion

ID: 9626664
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 08:20:44.849458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:06:31.818473
License: Public Domain

On Motion tor Rehearing.
Defendant in error contends that under the fifth headnote of the opinion in Wright v. Conner, 200 Ga. 413, the court held that the petition in that case was subject to general demurrer. We have not overlooked or misconstrued that headnote. It refers to acts of omission only and did not refer to positive acts of waste, *814such as timber cutting. The petition.was perfected insofar as positive acts of waste were involved, and when this was done and when the other corrections were made, the petition was no longer subject to general demurrer.

Rehearing denied.