Court Opinion

ID: 1008135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:48.089009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:27.594799
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONALD G. BUMPUS, a/k/a Ronald Bompus,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
Chief District Judge. (CR-98-185, CA-01-156)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald G. Bumpus, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald G. Bumpus seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Bumpus, Nos. CR-98-185; CA-

01-156 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 2002).   We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2