Court Opinion

ID: 7799916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-11 20:00:29.334324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:29:00.884343
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10079      Document: 00516428533         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/11/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                  No. 22-10079                       August 11, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                           Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Armando Rocha,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:20-CR-389-1

   Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Rocha
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rocha has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10079     Document: 00516428533           Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/11/2022

                                    No. 22-10079

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and
   we concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2