Court Opinion

ID: 2659298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-02 19:56:21.152892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:35.187293
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-1087       Document: 18           Page: 1       Filed: 04/02/2014

            NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                     ______________________

   HAREN S. GANDHI, JOHN VITO CAVATAIO,
 ROBERT HENRY HAMMERLE, AND YISUN CHENG,
                Appellants,

                                    v.

     BRIGITTE BANDL-KONRAD, ANDREAS
  HERTZBERG, BERND KRUTZSCH, ARNO NOLTE,
     MARKUS PAULE, STEFAN RENFFTLEN,
   NORBERT WALDBUESSER, MICHEL WEIBEL,
   GUENTER WENNINGER, AND ROLF WUNSCH,
                   Appellees.
             ______________________

                           2014-1087
                     ______________________

     Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,839.

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

   HAREN S. GANDHI, JOHN VITO CAVATAIO,
 ROBERT HENRY HAMMERLE, AND YISUN CHENG,
                 Appellees,

                                    v.

     BRIGITTE BANDL-KONRAD, ANDREAS
  HERTZBERG, BERND KRUTZSCH, ARNO NOLTE,
Case: 14-1087    Document: 18      Page: 2   Filed: 04/02/2014

 2                           GANDHI   v. BANDL-KONRAD

       MARKUS PAULE, STEFAN RENFFTLEN,
     NORBERT WALDBUESSER, MICHEL WEIBEL,
     GUENTER WENNINGER, AND ROLF WUNSCH,
                    Appellants.
              ______________________

                        2014-1088
                  ______________________

     Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,839.
                   ______________________

                      ON MOTION
                  ______________________
                         ORDER
     Brigitte Bandl-Konrad et al. move without opposition
 to withdraw their cross-appeal (Appeal No. 2014-1088).
     Upon consideration thereof,
     IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted. 2014-1088 is dismissed.
 The revised official caption for 2014-1087 is reflected
 above.
     (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2014-1088.
                                      FOR THE COURT

                                      /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Clerk of Court

 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 2014-1088 Only):
 April 2, 2014
 s30