Court Opinion

ID: 227319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:29:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:15.451298
License: Public Domain

189 F.2d 702
89 U.S.App.D.C. 406
Marie E. BARWICK, Petitionerv.Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent.
Misc. No. 285.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 24, 1951.Decided June 7, 1951.

Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
James M. Desmond, Washington, D.C., with whom Roy B. Kelly, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent.
Before EDGERTON and BAZELON, Circuit Judges, and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM.

1
The petition for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied.  Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 63 S.Ct. 582, 87 L.Ed. 746; Newman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 419, 184 F.2d 275.