Court Opinion

ID: 9656990
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 20:10:03.782075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:15:27.706089
License: Public Domain

SHORT, Judge
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act allows for correction of data found to be inaccurate or incomplete. Minn.Stat. § 13.04, subd. 4 (1990). However, it is not a vehicle for amending the judgments of state officials. See Rogers v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 607 F.Supp. 697, 699 (N.D.Cal.1985). The Commissioner of Administration did not find the data on Johnston to be factually inaccurate or incomplete. Rather, the Commissioner reweighed the evidence and second-guessed the subjective evaluation of *167the social worker, the correction of inaccurate facts requires the correction of an opinion based on those facts. I would therefore reverse the orders of the Commissioner. This is not a case where