Court Opinion

ID: 3810900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:49:36.756367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:15.740454
License: Public Domain

In this case substantially the *Page 274 
same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255,298 P. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.