Court Opinion

ID: 5113742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-02 18:08:13.164445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:21:43.747358
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Matthew Clemons appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2012).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. (2012), unless otherwise indicated.