Court Opinion

ID: 3106445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:05:49.04043+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:14:01.815022
License: Public Domain

Jf ourtij Court of
                                        m Antonio,

                                           March 27. 2014

                                        No. 04-13-00742-CV

             Pascual Madrigal P.L.L.C. d/b/a The Law Offices of Pascual Madrigal,
                                              Appellant

                                                  v.

                                    Commercial IT Solutions, Inc.,
                                              Appellee

                                     Trial Court Case No. 381855

                                          ORDER

       The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral
argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the
appeal. See Tex. R. ApP. P. 39.8.     Therefore, all requests lor oral argument are denied, and the
cause is advanced for ON BRIICFS submission on May 6, 2014, to the following panel: Chief
Justice Stone, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa.        All parties will be notified of the Court's
decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. APP. P. 48.

       Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that
oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the lega! and factual issues
presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'l". P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)
days from the date of this order.

       It is so ORDERED on March 27. 2014.

                                                                Caihe7me>Stoiie, Chief Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said
court on this March 27. 2014.

          ,*< OF Aj&fr,
                                                                               , Clertf