Court Opinion

ID: 7372998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-28 00:20:55.204627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:43.396575
License: Public Domain

There being no assignments of error "bound with the transcript," as required by Rule 1 of the Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XX (Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cum.Pocket Part, p. 220; Recompiled Code 1958 (unofficial), Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1154), we have no alternative but to affirm the decree appealed from. See: Trussell v. Ripps, 277 Ala. 248, 168 So.2d 619; Erwin v. Erwin,269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183,85 So.2d 892; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764, and cases there cited.
Affirmed.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur. *Page 218