Court Opinion

ID: 9382929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-29 06:09:15.619201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:42.496698
License: Public Domain

DENY and Opinion Filed March 21, 2023

                                     S  In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00036-CV

      IN RE UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

                Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court
                             Dallas County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-01250

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                    Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel
                             Opinion by Justice Nowell
      In this original proceeding, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial

court’s order granting real party in interest’s motion to quash non-party discovery

requests and motion for protection.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that

relator has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Erin A. Nowell/
                                         ERIN A. NOWELL
                                         JUSTICE

230036F.P05

                                      –2–