Court Opinion

ID: 6950362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:30:51.339826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:03.550992
License: Public Domain

Caton, C. J. The acknowledgment of this chattel mortgage was insufficient. The statute says, the mortgagor “may acknowledge such mortgage before any justice of the peace in the justice’s district in which he may reside,” and there is no other authority in the statute for acknowledging, and it follows as a matter of course, the mortgage cannot have the effect prescribed by the statute, unless it is acknowledged in conformity to the statute. The word “ may,” in this statute, is imperative. The meaning of the statute is, that the mortgage shall be acknowledged before a justice of the district in which the mortgagor resides. It was for the legislature to determine where the mortgage should be acknowledged, and it is not for us to inquire whether it would not have been as well to have the acknowledgment and memorandum made in the district where the property was situate. The district in this statute means election district. The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.