Court Opinion

ID: 5553188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:36:05.927549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:09.934276
License: Public Domain

By the Court.

McDonald, J.
delivering the opinion.
The declaration in this case might have been amended by alleging a colloquium, that the defendant’s steel-trap had been stolen, with suitable averments, that the words were spoken of and concerning the plaintiff, in reference thereto; and on proof of the said allegations with the words, the action might have been sustained. The Court below held that if the words as proven had been actionable, the declaration might have been amended, but we understood the decision to be, that the declaration could not have been so amended as to have sustained an action upon the words: words in themselves not actionable may be made so by avering a colloquium with suitable averments to apply the speaking to the subject.
Judgment reversed,