Court Opinion

ID: 9621243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 05:54:15.457668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:59.598498
License: Public Domain

Six, J.,
concurring: The Board acknowledges in the conclusion to its brief: “As Judge Rosen observed in his order, nothing in the Act prevents the appellant from submitting his application to sit for tire licensure examination under K.S.A. § 65-1426 and § 65-1428.”
I agree with the majority result but disagree with the majority’s inference that the Board’s position is: “[A] dentist having fallen from professional grace should be forever precluded from seeking redemption from his or her peers.” As the district court observed, redemption may come from successfully sitting for the licensure examination.