Court Opinion

ID: 8509012
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 08:34:48.768687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:51:01.810582
License: Public Domain

SMITH, P. J.
The court feels that there is no need of further consideration of this cause. We are unanimous that 'no injunction should be granted and that the petition should be dismissed. We are of the opinion, in the first place, that the question presented *194here could and should be presented in the insolvency court. If that is not so, we think there is no exclusive' occupancy of Front street proposed, and that the trustees have full power to proceed as they are proceeding. As to carrying out the contract between the trustees and the Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company, we believe that the power of the trustees is ample; that in occupying Front street by the track of the Southern Railway, the trustees have ample power to move the Baltimore & Ohio track, and further, upon the evidence, the usage proposed is not an interference with the public use of the street as would destroy such use.
Swing and Jones, JJ., concur.