Court Opinion

ID: 7772425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:55:51.114626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:47.109902
License: Public Domain

I write specially to state that I do not agree with the majority's holding in its unpublished memorandum that claims II, VI, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, and XVII (claims 2, 6, 27, 18, 19, 20, and 31 in the appellant's petition) were not sufficiently pleaded pursuant to Rules 32.3 and 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. P. However, I concur with the majority's decision to affirm the summary denial of Melvin Ray's Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition because those claims are without merit or are otherwise precluded.