Court Opinion

ID: 7748788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:15:16.039362+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:39.078467
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.