Court Opinion

ID: 2291630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:59:59.488037+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:09.324874
License: Public Domain

327 S.W.3d 628 (2010)
Theon FORD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94071.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
December 21, 2010.
*629 Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Theon Ford appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035[1] motion for post-conviction relief from the judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree assault and two counts of armed criminal action, for which he was sentenced to a total of twenty years' imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); O'Neal v. State, 236 S.W.3d 91, 95 (Mo.App. E.D. 2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.