Court Opinion

ID: 8681159
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:12:40.130111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.468083
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Castaneda-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Garcia has filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Castaneda-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Castaneda-Garcia’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.