Court Opinion

ID: 8055296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:32:09.755858+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:49.671835
License: Public Domain

Pennington, J.
The first, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on settlement of account, on or about [658] the 29th December, 1810, $30.04, which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.
The other judges concurred.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited is Carter v. Lackey, Spenc. 608.