Court Opinion

ID: 96986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:42:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:21.518434
License: Public Domain

212 U.S. 568
29 S.Ct. 692
53 L.Ed. 654
RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,v.VENTURA MUNICH  RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,  v.  O. M. WOOD  RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,  v.  MARIA VENEGA PERIANES
No. 457.
No. 473.
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 1, 1909

1
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.

2
Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.

3
Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, §§ 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, § 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U. S. 149, 159, 48 L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U. S. 339, 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U. S. 80, 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U. S. 64, 73, 51 L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.