Court Opinion

ID: 9948570
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-07 17:01:31.531293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:45.550020
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10199   Document: 8-1      Date Filed: 03/07/2024     Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 24-10199
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      JAQUELINE APARECIDA MENDES,
      ELIEL SANTOS CHAGAS,
      MYLENA MENDES CHAGAS,
                                                              Petitioners,
      versus
      U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                             Respondent.

                         ____________________

                  Petition for Review of a Decision of the
                       Board of Immigration Appeals
USCA11 Case: 24-10199     Document: 8-1      Date Filed: 03/07/2024     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                 24-10199

                           Agency No. A220-735-150
                           ____________________

      Before WILSON, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. The 30-day statutory time limit established in the Immigra-
      tion and Nationality Act (“INA”) required the petitioners to file a
      petition for review of the November 30, 2023, decision by the
      Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming their order of re-
      moval on or before January 2, 2024. See INA §§ 101(a)(47),
      240(c)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(47), 1229a(c)(1)(A); INA
      § 242(b)(1)-(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)-(2); Fed. R. App. 26(a)(1)(C);
      see also Dakane v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269, 1272 n.3 (11th Cir.
      2005) (“[A] petitioner has 30 days from the date of the final order of
      removal to seek review in this Court.”). However, the petitioners
      did not file the petition for review until January 22, 2024. Thus, the
      petition for review is untimely as to the BIA decision and we lack
      jurisdiction to review it. See Fed. R. App. P. 15(a)(1); Chao Lin v.
      U.S. Att’y Gen., 677 F.3d 1043, 1045 (11th Cir. 2012).
            All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for
      rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other
      requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.