Court Opinion

ID: 9916429
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-09 23:06:25.735951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:27.494448
License: Public Domain

01/09/2024

               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
                                                                                         Case Number: DA 23-0150

                                                DA 23-0150

 PAMELA JO POLEJEWSKI,

                Plaintiff and Appellant,

          v.                                                           ORDER

 CASCADE COUNTY, JOHN and JANE DOE,

                Defendants and Appellees.

          On November 28, 2023, we issued an Opinion in the above-entitled action,
affirming the District Court's dismissal of Polejewski's lawsuit against Cascade County on
issue preclusion grounds, and declaring Polejewski a vexatious litigant. Polejewski v.
Cascade Cty., 2023 MT 230N. Polejewski timely filed a petition for rehearing.
          M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a) provides that a petition for rehearing will be considered only
when the Court "overlooked some fact material to the decision," when "it overlooked some
question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or when "its
decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court.
Having fully considered Polejewski's petition, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted
under the standards of M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a).
          Accordingly,
          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
          The Clerk of Court is directed to mail copies of this Order to Pamela Jo Polejewski
and all counsel of record.
          DATED this              r̀> day of January, 2024.

     r
     'k

                                                                  Chief Justice
      JAN 0 9 27:if
   Bowen Greenwood
                         J   rt
9eP-A;-&-MciWp