Court Opinion

ID: 9368718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-06 20:01:02.643504+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:10.341631
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10901    Document: 46-1     Date Filed: 02/06/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10901
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 4:21-cr-00008-MW-MAF-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10901      Document: 46-1     Date Filed: 02/06/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-10901

       Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and WILSON and LUCK, Cir-
       cuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Jimmy Lee High-
       smith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
       further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of
       the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo-
       tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Highsmith’s conviction and
       sentence are AFFIRMED.