Court Opinion

ID: 7065407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 07:25:26.908104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:12:21.700870
License: Public Domain

Roby, J.
This is an action by appellee to recover damages for a breach of warranty. In 1892 appellants executed their warranty deed to appellee for ninety-four and eighty-five one-hundredths acres of land. After the conveyance it was discovered that appellants ’ four children were the owners of four-fifths of the land. In order to perfect title, the purchase price having been fully paid, LaPayette Underwood was appointed guardian for the children, and proceedings were had designed to transfer the interest of said children to appellee. These proceedings were subsequently decided to have been ineffective and said interest was recovered by said children. Underwood v. Deckard (1904), 34 Ind. App. 198.
*664In the pending action appellee recovered judgment for tlie proportionate share of the purchase price of said land.
It was contended that the right to recover on account of such breach was waived at the time of the appointment of the guardian and the institution of the aforesaid proceeding’s. The finding is -against appellants on this controverted fact, and is at this time conclusive.
Various points are made for reversal. They have been examined, and are not regarded as sufficient. There is no good reason for adding to the already voluminous case law of the State by discussing them.
Judgment affirmed.