Court Opinion

ID: 5079111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 11:52:42.286296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:17.210056
License: Public Domain

OPINION
Appellee was arrested and charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. After a pretrial hearing, the trial court granted appellee's motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Van Natta, 805 S.W.2d 40 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth, 1991).
The State raises five grounds for review. As is true in every case where discretionary *Page 609 
review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813
(Tex.Cr.App. 1983). With this understanding, we refuse the State's petition for discretionary review.
McCORMICK, P.J., and BAIRD, J., would grant. *Page 610 
[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGE 610 CONTAINED DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS] *Page 611 
[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGE 611 CONTAINED DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS] *Page 612