Court Opinion

ID: 1030848
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:21:24.897778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:27.756423
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-7590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

TOMMY CARNEL GENERAL,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:99-cr-00068-H-3)

Submitted:    November 19, 2009             Decided:   December 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Carnel General, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Tommy   Carnel    General       appeals    the   district   court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).         We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.        United States v. General, No. 5:99-cr-

00068-H-3   (E.D.N.C.   Aug.    4,   2009).           We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                        2