Court Opinion

ID: 9445864
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 21:39:25.126526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:25.704567
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing before the Court en banc.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for en banc procedure, having been submitted at Judge HINCKS’ request to all the circuit judges of the circuit who are in active service, was favored only by Judges MEDINA and HINCKS, Chief Judge CLARK and Judge WATERMAN being opposed, and Judges LUMBARD and MOORE disqualifying themselves and not voting. Since a hearing en banc has not been ordered by a majority of said judges, the petition is denied by the division of the court which heard the original appeal, 28 U.S.C.A. § 46(c), Judge HINCKS dissenting.