Court Opinion

ID: 4279055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-29 16:01:31.522393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:27.566742
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 16-1108V
                                        Filed: May 4, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * *
JUDY LINETTE GENTRY,    *                                                UNPUBLISHED
                        *
          Petitioner,   *                                                Decision on Joint Stipulation;
                        *                                                Transverse Myelitis (“TM”);
v.                      *                                                Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine.
                        *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH     *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,     *
                        *
          Respondent.   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Howard Gold,Esq., Gold Law Firm, LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA, for petitioner.
Linda Renzi,, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                 DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

       On September 6, 2016, Judy Linette Gentry [“Ms. Gentry or “petitioner”] filed a petition
for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges
that she developed transverse myelitis (“TM”) after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on
September 27, 2013. See Stipulation, at ¶¶ 1-4, ECF No. 23. Respondent denies that the
aforementioned immunization caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

         Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On May 4, 2018, the parties filed a
joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this
decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002,
Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In
accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other
information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule
requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the
identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of
citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

                                                           1
Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

             A lump sum of $100,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Judy
             Linette Gentry. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
             available under § 300aa-15(a).

        I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and
on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance
with this decision.3

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                     s/ Mindy Michaels Roth
                                                     Mindy Michaels Roth
                                                     Special Master

3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the
right to seek review.
                                                         2