Court Opinion

ID: 9608518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 03:14:07.266937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:42.720720
License: Public Domain

McGRAW, J.,
dissenting.
(Filed July 3, 2003)
Though the facts alleged in the proposed third-party complaint have been known to Dr. Leung since the underlying medical malpractice action was first commenced more than one year ago, Dr. Leung did not seek to institute a third-party action against Dr. Wanger and Shenandoah Valley Medical Systems until two months before the scheduled trial date. In my view, Dr. Leung’s professed explanation for this delay — that he did not wish to jeopardize his professional relationship with Dr. Wanger — is not a sufficient justification for significantly delaying the plaintiffs right to a jury trial, particularly in light of the plaintiffs representation during oral argument that she was prepared to proceed to trial as scheduled. Because I believe the majority’s holding operates to assist Dr. Leung in his seemingly calculated effort to impede the final resolution of this case, I respectfully dissent.