Court Opinion

ID: 9834010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:13:06.280434+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:50.572694
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Appellee has filed a very voluminous motion for rehearing in tbis cause. However, in said motion no new authorities are cited or new argument produced.
Appellee strenuously insists, however, that tbis court should have passed upon tbe question as to whether or not tbe statute .providing for attorney’s fees and 12 per cent, penalty was applicable to a fraternal insurance company. In view of tbe fact that tbis case was reversed and rendered, we could see no good reason why said assignments of error should be further discussed, and believe that our recent opinion correctly states tbe law applicable to tbis case. We therefore overrule motion for rehearing.