Court Opinion

ID: 9902788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-27 15:23:37.540157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:46.244080
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                      Case No. 5D22-2605
                  LT Case No. 2018-CF-002600
                 _____________________________

MARKEY MORRISON,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Peter M. Brigham, Judge.

Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and Jane Almy,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and
Robin A. Compton, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

                        August 25, 2023

PER CURIAM.

    In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation
and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Morrison, as well as

    1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
the trial court’s order denying Morrison’s motion to withdraw his
plea. Because the record does not include a written revocation
order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation
violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written
revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of
probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally
pronounced. See Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA
2022); Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

    AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

                                 2