Court Opinion

ID: 8466598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:41:52.442039+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:13.880757
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Arnette Watts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Watts, No. 2:04-cr-00086-RAJ-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.