Court Opinion

ID: 2907147
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 00:39:13.922124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:35.999091
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-09-00270-CV

____________________

IN THE MATTER OF C.A.T. 

 

On Appeal from the 410th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-12-12583 JV

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
	On July 21, 2009, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless
the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal.  Appellant did not respond to the notice.
	The trial court appointed counsel to represent C.A.T. in this appeal but found C.A.T.'s
family can afford to pay the cost of the reporter's record.  C.A.T. has not asserted that he
cannot afford to pay the filing fee, nor has he asserted that his family cannot afford to pay the
filing fee.  There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the
appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.

						_____________________________
							STEVE McKEITHEN
							        Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered August 13, 2009
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.