Court Opinion

ID: 5575026
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:21:30.028292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:53.787047
License: Public Domain

Lumpkin, J.
Lien laws, are strictly construed, and one who-claims a lien must bring himself clearly within the law. Hawkins v. Chambliss, 116 Ga. 813. By the act of February 24, 1873 (Acts 1873, p. 44, see. 8), it was declared that the lien of a mechanic must be asserted by the retention of the property, and not otherwise. Hurley v. Epps, 69 Ga. 611. By the act of 1884 (Acts 1884-85, p. 43), this-was so amended as to declare that the lien may be asserted by retention of the property, or the mechanic may surrender such personal property and give credit, in which event the lien shall be enforced in accordance with the provisions of what is now section 2816 of the Civil Code, which provides for the enforcement generally of liens on personal property. If possession of the property is surrendered, to the debtor, the mechanic must record his lien within ten days after such work is done and material furnished. Civil Code, §2805. It is not a compliance with the law for a mechanic to do different jobs of work in' the way of repairing various vehicles at different times, deliver possession to the debtor, fail to record the lien within ten days, and take no action until he desires at some indefinite period to collect his money. A general contract to do repair work on various vehicles, as they may need it, for a year or for some indefinite time, does not constitute the work so done a single job, so as to authorize the recording of a lien on all the vehicles within ten days after the expiration of the term of such contract by lapse of time or action of the parties. Nor can the debtor and creditor preserve a lien on the property in favor of the latter bjr an agreement to the effect that the bill for such repair work shall become due when the mechanic may so desire and demand payment. To permit one creditor to retain indefinitely a right to a lien, not by compliance with the statute but by virtue of some agreement with the debtor, and thus to reserve the secret power of having a lien or not as he may wish, is not according to either the *444letter or the spirit of the lien law. The decision in New Ebenezer Association v. Gress Lumber Co., 89 Ga. 125, is not applicable to this case. There materials for the improvement of real estate were furnished under one contract and as a part of the same improvement; and though the items were furnished at different times, the record of the lien within three months after the latest item was furnished was held sufficient. This is unlike the doing of separate and distinct repairs at different times upon different vehicles as they, may need it, although one contract may have provided therefor.
Another creditor of a common debtor having filed his counter-affidavit for the purpose of contesting the claim of lien asserted in this case, in accordance with the Civil Code, §2816, par.-6, the presiding judge, on motion of such creditor, properly held that the affidavit of the plaintiff, showing substantially the facts set out in the headnote, was insufficient, and dismissed the levy.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur..