Court Opinion

ID: 9447813
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 22:45:17.028838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:31:12.270014
License: Public Domain

DANAHER, Circuit Judge
(concurring separately).
The trial judge found established by a. preponderance of the evidence that there had been “a sufficiently continuous use of the alley for a sufficiently long period of time to establish the prescriptive right” claimed by the appellee. His findings-have not been shown to be clearly erroneous. He concludes, in effect, that user was “open, notorious, exclusive, continuous, and adverse.” Umhau v. Bazzuro, 1942, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 394, 396, 133 F.2d 356, 358, and I vote to affirm accordingly.