Court Opinion

ID: 9414152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 23:39:37.798386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:47:10.554789
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Treating the petition for rehearing en bane as a petition for panel rehearing, the *222petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.