Court Opinion

ID: 9404391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-22 21:03:31.145121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:13.565354
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6138      Doc: 13         Filed: 06/21/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6138

        LEANTHONY T. WINSTON,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        MEGAN MONTOYA; ROBERT BROADBENT; LINDSEY SANTOS; DANIEL LOVE;
        B. M. TRATE,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:22-cv-00506-AWA-RJK)

        Submitted: June 15, 2023                                          Decided: June 21, 2023

        Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        LeAnthony T. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6138       Doc: 13        Filed: 06/21/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               LeAnthony T. Winston seeks to appeal an order from the District Court for the

        Northern District of California transferring his Bivens * action to the Eastern District of

        Virginia. “[W]e have no jurisdiction to review a decision to transfer venue rendered by a

        district court in another circuit.” Brock v. Entre Comput. Ctrs., Inc., 933 F.2d 1253, 1257

        (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we deny Winston’s pending motions and dismiss his appeal

        for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      DISMISSED

               *
                   Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
        (1971).

                                                    2