Court Opinion

ID: 2950653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 06:46:45.629063+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:33.331618
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                             NOS. WR-82,642-01 & WR-82,642-02

                          EX PARTE ROBERT CANTU, Applicant

                    ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
                      CAUSE NOS. 2008CR11211-W1 & 2008CR11212-W1
                             IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT
                                 FROM BEXAR COUNTY

       Per curiam. YEARY , J., not participating.

                                          OPINION

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges

of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to fifteen years’

imprisonment in each case. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Cantu v. State,

Nos. 04-09-00521-CR & 04-09-00522-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio, May 5, 2010) (not designated

for publication).

       Applicant contends that he is actually innocent and that material impeaching evidence was
                                                                                                     2

withheld from the defense in violation of Brady v. Maryland.1 Specifically, he argues the defense

was not made aware of misconduct on the part of arresting officers.

       In agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court determined that relief should

be granted under Brady, but that Applicant’s actual innocence claim under Schlup v. Delo2 is

unavailing because the constitutional claim upon which it is based is not procedurally barred. Ex

parte Villegas, 415 S.W.3d 885 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). We agree with the trial court. Relief is

granted on the Brady claim. The judgments in Cause Nos. 2008CR11211 and 2008CR11212 in the

175th District Court of Bexar County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the

Sheriff of Bexar County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue

any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 1, 2015
Do not publish

       1
           373 U.S. 83 (1963).
       2
           513 U.S. 298 (1995).