Court Opinion

ID: 9695682
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 18:27:26.135551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:31.417979
License: Public Domain

HOFFMAN, Judge,
concurring:
I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that this appeal must be quashed because the appeal to this Court was not filed in a timely manner. Caples v. Klugman, 202 Pa.Super. 517, 198 A.2d 342 (1964); Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 502; 17 P.S. § 211.502(d). I do not join in the additional discussion because the Court engages in de novo factfinding based solely on speculation concerning the state of the record.