Court Opinion

ID: 3355908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:01:30.933444+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:29.821758
License: Public Domain

The question raised by this plea is whether the plaintiff is an employee or a tenant of the defendant. If, at the time of the accident, he was an employee the compensation act would control and this plea would be good and this action would fail; if he was a tenant at the time, then this action should stand and this plea should be denied.
For a number of years plaintiff has occupied a room in a building owned by the defendant for which he paid a rental of $50. a month. This rental, some years ago, was reduced to $25. a month, and for a period of a year or more, including *Page 450 
the time when the accident occurred, the defendant was apparently charging the plaintiff no rent for the room he occupied. Since this action was brought it appeared that the defendant had told the plaintiff that he should begin paying a rental.
For a period of time extending over some years plaintiff has swept a stairway and halls leading to his room and has shown prospective tenants a room or rooms in the building that were for rent.
Under these circumstances plaintiff was a tenant and not an employee.
   The plea to the jurisdiction is denied.