Court Opinion

ID: 3086428
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:49:30.764188+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:55.744836
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00036-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

MATTHEW JENKINS, MARY JENKINS A/K/A
MARY WINE AND MARY JENKINS AS NEXT FRIEND
OF WIDEN JENKINS,                                                                       Appellants,

                                                   v.

DALE MCBRIDE,                                      Appellant.
____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 40th District Court
                    of Ellis County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
      Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        Appellant, Matthew Jenkins, Mary Jenkins a/k/a Mary Wine and Mary Jenkins as

Next Friend of Widen Jenkins, appealed a judgment entered by the 40th District Court of

Ellis County, Texas. 1 On February 19, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants,

        1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West 2005).
in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $195.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellants

have not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $195.00 filing fee. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to pay

the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
20th day of March, 2014.

                                            2