Court Opinion

ID: 996633
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:46.74232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:03.573250
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-1904

MAMIE J. SAUNDERS, Widow of Emanuel Saunders,

                                                             Petitioner,

          versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO-
GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

                                                             Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(96-0929-BLA)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 22, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mamie J. Saunders, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Edward
Waldman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mamie J. Saunders seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West

1986 & Supp. 1998). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. Saunders v. DOWCP, BRB No. 96-0929-BLA, (B.R.B. May 20,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2