Court Opinion

ID: 7978650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 01:02:50.79693+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:58.954450
License: Public Domain

Quinn, J.
A brief statement of the facts surrounding this case is as follows: September 13, 1912, Salvatore Palazzolo was in the employ of defendant railroad company in Carlton county, this state, when he came to his death as the result of an accident. His domicile was in St. Louis county, Missouri, where his two brothers and Domenico Lieavoli, an uncle of his wife, resided. At the time his wife and only child were in Italy. September 30, 1912, the uncle of Mrs. Palazzolo, upon petition of the brothers, was appointed administrator of the estate of deceased by the probate court of St. Louis county, Missouri. He qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. October 22, Lieavoli, as such administrator, settled and released all claims for damages on account of the death of deceased with the defendant for the sum of $2,350, which settlement was reported to and approved by the probate court, and thereafter the money accounted for to the widow and child.
October 14, 1912, being eight days prior to the settlement, Attilio Castigliano, residing at the city of Duluth, was, upon his own petition and without the knowledge or consent of any of the relatives of deceased, appointed special administrator of the estate by the probate court of Carlton county, Minnesota, and on the following day brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for the death of deceased by wrongful act of .defendant. Defendant answered setting up the settlement. February 1 Castigliano was appointed general administrator of the estate in Carlton county. The administrator in Missouri and the defendant appeared and objected. The Missouri administrator appealed to the district court and JuljM, 1913, the order appointing plaintiff general administrator was reversed and judgment entered. In the meantime plaintiff and defendant instituted proceedings in the Missouri probate court to have the appointment of Lieavoli as administrator set aside and the settlement vacated, but were unsuccessful.
H. F. Greene had acted as attorney for Castigliano in the various proceedings and finally intervened in the action, claiming a lien for his services and a right to a judgment against defendant therefor. Defendant demurred to the complaint of the intervener, which was *387sustained by the district court, but was reversed on appeal. The defendant answered and the case was tried to the court without a jury and judgment ordered in favor of the intervener for $737.50, together with interest and the costs and disbursements. Judgment was entered thereon and defendant appealed.
In his complaint the intervener alleges: That he was employed by Attilio Castigliano, Royal Italian Consular Agent at Duluth, who, upon his own petition has been appointed special administrator of the estate of deceased. October 15, 1912, this suit was brought against the defendant to recover damages for the death of deceased by wrongful act of defendant. October 22, 1912, Domenico Lieavoli, general administrator of the estate, made a settlement with the defendant, whereby defendant paid to him as such administrator the sum of $2,350, taking a receipt therefor in full settlement and release for all claims for damages on account of the death of the said Palazzolo. That the intervener had a special agreement with Castigliano for his compensation as attorney in the action at the rate of 25 per cent of all money paid on account of the death of deceased, and that the services ■ of bringing the action were of the reasonable value of not less than one-fourth of the amount of the settlement; and that'his expenses connected therewith amounted to $150. The proofs upon the trial failed to substantiate these allegations. The intervener testified, upon direct examination, - that he had an agreement in the form of a letter, dated October 14, 1911, from one Charles C. Hyde, of Chicago, General Counsel for the Italian Consul General at Chicago, to take care of all the Italian Consul cases in his district in Minnesota; that this was the contract upon which he relied and acted in the case at bar. The letter was offered in evidence, the material part of which is as follows:
“My dear Mr. Greene:
“I have to inquire whether you desire to take charge of such Italian cases as may arise in your county and in others immediately adjacent thereto such as Itasca, Aitkin, Carlton, Lake and Cook, by reason of accidents resulting in death claims or claims for personal injuries.
“By my own arrangement with the Italian Government terminable on thirty days’ notice and. extending to the end of the present fiscal year, June 30, 1912, I am in a position to offer you such cases on the *388following basis: Your fees to be 22 per cent of the amount received in settlement provided suit is brought and declaration filed; an additional 3 per cent to be charged and secured for this office for its services of supervision and co-operation, making a total charge of 25 per cent for legal services; no charge to be made for any cases settled prior to the filing of declaration (or what may be equivalent thereto under your code); no distinction to be made between personal injury and death eases; the Italian consulate at Chicago or its agent at Duluth to advance court cases; investigation to be made by your office with the co-operation of Mr. A. Castigliano, Consular Agent at Duluth, according to whatever arrangement you may mutually agree upon, but without any charge to the Italian Consulate or its agency.”
Greene testified upon the trial: That he had been reimbursed by the Italian consul at Chicago for his expenses; that his services in the present case, rendered prior to his learning of the settlement, consisted in the drawing and service of the summons and complaint; that the same was of the reasonable value of from $100 to $150, and that his other services were in connection with proceedings in probate court. It is clear that neither the allegations of the complaint nor the judgment are supported by the proofs. The letter from Charles C. Hyde to intervener, written more than a year prioT to the death of Palazzolo, was not admissible for any purpose. Greene did not rely nor base his rights to recover upon the reasonable value of his services but upon contract.
After the trial in the district court and before the decision was filed, Greene died, and Susan Eyan Greene was substituted in his stead herein.
Judgment reversed.