Court Opinion

ID: 5586381
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:54:44.340328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:15.729120
License: Public Domain

Pee Cubiam.
This case coming before the entire bench of six Justices, the question being whether or not the court erred in granting a temporary injunction, and the Justices being equally divided, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did err, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.
Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.
Courts, 15 C. J. p. 966, n. 78.