Court Opinion

ID: 8654937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:14:58.060018+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:38.893109
License: Public Domain

ORDER
Steven Weber pleaded guilty to a single count of wire fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The district court sentenced him to 36 months’ imprisonment and 5 years’ supervised release, and ordered him to pay $178,464 in restitution. The court directed Weber to pay at least $200 per month while on supervised release but set no payment schedule for his term of imprisonment. The court also ordered Weber to participate in the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
On appeal Weber argues only that the district court committed plain error by failing to set a restitution payment schedule for his period of incarceration. Weber filed his brief before we decided United States v. Sawyer, 521 F.3d 792, 793-94 (7th Cir.2008). In that decision we held that if a defendant cannot pay immediately the sentencing court should set a payment schedule to begin after the defendant’s release from prison. Id. at 795-95. Payments during the term of incarceration should be handled through the Bureau of Prisons, not the courts. Id. at 795-96. In his reply brief, filed after the Sawyer decision, Weber concedes that his argument is now foreclosed by that decision. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not err by setting a payment schedule to begin after Weber’s release from incarceration.
AFFIRMED.