Court Opinion

ID: 989193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:03:16.447944+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:42.430692
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GARY C. CROUCH,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-
91-397, CA-94-3237-3-19BC, CR-91-310)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary C. Crouch, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Crouch, Nos. CR-91-397; CR-91-310; CA-94-3237-3-19BC (D.S.C. Oct.

27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2