Court Opinion

ID: 7200184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 17:07:08.706697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:29.898593
License: Public Domain

LECHE, J.
Plaintiff bought certain property at tax sale in the Parish of Cameron. He paid the price of adjudication, including all taxes, costs and penalties. Believing himself to be the lawful owner thereof, he proceeded to have the property assessed in his own name and continued to pay taxes thereon for several years, when, by a judgment of court, it was decreed that his title was null and void, as based on a sale for taxes which had previously been paid. In other words, there had been a dual assessment of the property, on which the tax debtor had promptly paid and continued to pay all taxes, and through the errors of the tax assessor and collector plaintiff had not acquired any title.
The present suit is to recover from the Parish of Cameron so much of the parish taxes, viz.: One hundfed and forty-four and 5-100 dollars, as was paid by plaintiff upon the property which had thus erroneously been sold to him for non-payment of taxes.
Defendant excepted to plaintiff’s demand as showing no right or cause of action. The trial judge maintained the plea and plaintiff has appealed.
In the case of Lindner vs. City of N. O., 116 La. 372, 40 South. 736, the court says:
“A tax sale, in the absence of special legislation to the contrary, is generally held to be subject to the rule ‘caveat emptor’, and the purchaser assumes the risk of all illegalities and irregularities in the proceedings, of which, as they are open to his inspection, he is presumed to have notice. He is therefore without recourse against the municipality at the *337instance of which the sale is made, and which not pretending to sell its own property warrants neither the title nor the return of the price.”
See also Lisso & Bro. vs. Police Jury of Natchitoches, 127 La. 283, 53 South. 566, which is to the same effect, and which holds that “the laws regulating tax sales and the collection of taxes are sui generis and constitute a system to which the general provisions of the Civil Code have, ordinarily, but little application”. See also Louisiana Land Co. vs. Police Jury of Grant Parish, 156 La. 849, 101 South. 241; Simpson vs. City of N. O., 133 La. 384, 63 South. 57.
The ruling of the trial judge is supported - by law; it should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.