Court Opinion

ID: 9370459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-13 19:01:03.53528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.706916
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40623        Document: 00516643480             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/13/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                     ____________                                       FILED
                                                                                February 13, 2023
                                      No. 22-40623                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                    Summary Calendar                                      Clerk
                                    ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Antonio Ramirez-Gonzalez,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 1:22-CR-415-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Jones, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio
   Ramirez-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Gonzalez has filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40623     Document: 00516643480          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/13/2023

                                   No. 22-40623

   record reflected therein, as well as Ramirez-Gonzalez’s response. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2