Court Opinion

ID: 2767350
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-07 20:01:10.956152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:45:57.689729
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Geraldine M. Jones appeals the district court’s orders dismissing all but one of her claims in her civil complaint and granting summary judgment to Appellee on her remaining claim.
  
   *
  
  We have reviewed the
   
   *157
   
  record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
  
   Jones v. Food Emp’rs Labor Relations Ass’n & United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Fund Plan,
  
  No. 8:12-cv-00891-PWG (D.Md. Nov. 21, 2012 & Feb 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   We previously remanded this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Jones was entitled to have her time to file an appeal reopened under Rule 4(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The district court determined that Jones was entitled to a reopening of the appeal period and an extension of the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(5). Accordingly, we deny Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.