Court Opinion

ID: 8454291
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:00:13.449194+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.412901
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Pratt appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pratt, No. 1:00-cr-00027-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.