Court Opinion

ID: 9829034
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:56:28.271117+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:56.562900
License: Public Domain

On Motions for Rehearing.
With regard to the questions whether or not the statute of limitations of four years has application to the reformation asked for of the deed in question, and whether or not said statute ran against the claim of Mrs. Duey of the right to have the deed reformed from and after the date of the deed, we think the cases of Rowe v. Horton, 65 Tex. 89, Ransome v. Bearden, 50 Tex. 119, and Mounger v. Daugherty, 138 S. W. 1071, decide the question against her and her grantee. The circumstances shown by the testimony in this record develop nothing else than inexcusable neglect to discover the mistake in the deed.
All the motions for rehearing are overruled.