Court Opinion

ID: 1003587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:28:46.927348+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:21.576011
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-7623

WAYNE M. PARSONS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-00-490-3)

Submitted:   February 8, 2001           Decided:     February 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne M. Parsons, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Wayne M. Parsons seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Parson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     Parsons v. Gar-

raghty, No. CA-00-490-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2