Court Opinion

ID: 4216939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-01 19:14:15.005763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:44.435514
License: Public Domain

People v Quick (2017 NY Slip Op 07619)

People v Quick

2017 NY Slip Op 07619

Decided on November 1, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 1, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-09019
2015-09020

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v Michael Quick, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 10383/13, 3228/14)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Rebecca J. Gannon of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), both imposed August 27, 2015, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264; People v Cambridge, 145 AD3d 795, 795; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court