Court Opinion

ID: 211532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-13 08:28:35+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:06.940332
License: Public Domain

NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is
               not citable as precedent. It is a public record.

     United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

                                        05-1101
                                (Serial No. 07/819,040)

   IN RE ANDREW H. HUBER, LOUIS N. GASTINEL, and PAMELA J. BJORKMAN

                          __________________________

                          DECIDED: December 20, 2005
                          __________________________

Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit
Judge.

PER CURIAM.

      Andrew H. Huber, Louis N. Gastinel, and Pamela J. Bjorkman appeal the

decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals

and Interferences, Ex Parte Huber, Appeal No. 07/819,040 (June 30, 2004), which

affirmed the rejection of claims 24, 28, 33, and 34 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112,

¶ 2; and the rejection of claims 1, 6, 16, and 22-35 as lacking an adequate written

description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1. We affirm on the basis of the board’s opinion.