Court Opinion

ID: 8459980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 06:03:09.060922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:07.927660
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Queen, No. 1:93-cr-00369-AMD-1 (D. Md. filed Sept. 19 & entered Sept. 22, 2008; filed Oct. 1 & entered Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.