Court Opinion

ID: 3073439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:55:03.685072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:10:19.155581
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-13-00371-CR

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                  TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                             TYLER, TEXAS

RAY DON ARTERBERRY,                                         §   APPEAL FROM THE 7TH
APPELLANT

V.                                                          §   DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE                                                    §   SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

                                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             PER CURIAM
         Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant
and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion
to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).
Opinion delivered January 31, 2014.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

                                              (DO NOT PUBLISH)
                                   COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                            JUDGMENT

                                          JANUARY 31, 2014

                                          NO. 12-13-00371-CR

                                     RAY DON ARTERBERRY,
                                            Appellant
                                               V.
                                      THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                            Appellee

                                  Appeal from the 7th District Court
                         of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007-0887-10)

                    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss
the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and
that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.
                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.