Court Opinion

ID: 990517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:22:39.522807+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:37.942580
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6600

DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

OTIS RICHARDS; DANNY R. THOMPSON; SAM DANIELS;
OFFICER MASSEY; JOSEPH LOFTON,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-96-10-5-BO)

Submitted:   September 20, 1996           Decided:   October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Yarborough v. Richards, No. CA-96-10-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2