Court Opinion

ID: 995117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:32:41.118185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:58.895779
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES DEANDREW CORNELIUS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
Judge. (CR-93-12, CA-97-228-MU)

Submitted:   May 14, 1998                   Decided:   May 26, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Deandrew Cornelius, Appellant Pro Se. Patrice Pearlette
Lewis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Cornelius, Nos. CR-93-12; CA-97-228-MU
(W.D.N.C Aug. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2