Court Opinion

ID: 9832260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:46:14.562736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:44.885945
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.
The expression in the opinion, “As the appellant Mills must recover •¡upon the strength of his own title,” etc., as pointed out by appellants in their motion for a rehearing, is not technically correct and was inadvertently used. But it does not affect the decision of the case. The idea to be expressed was that appellees as the holders of the notes would ¡be entitled to recover unless Mills could show that a lien had been fixed upon the property by the record of the abstract of the Puster & Co. judgment. While the questions raised by the appellants are difficult ¡and not free from doubt, we believe that we have decided them correctly, ¡and so overrule the motion for a rehearing.

Overruled.

Writ of error refused.