Court Opinion

ID: 9664095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:02:46.748492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:02.047576
License: Public Domain

BRYAN, Judge,
concurring in the result.
Because the record does not contain any evidence proving that the tree at issue posed a danger to Kathy Ledford’s house, I concur in the result. However, had the record contained such evidence, I would have voted to affirm the trial court’s judgment. See, e.g., Lemon v. Curington, 78 Idaho 522, 306 P.2d 1091 (1957) (affirming a judgment that authorized the plaintiffs to remove a boundary-line tree that posed a danger to their house but enjoined them from removing another boundary-line tree that did not pose a danger to their house).