Court Opinion

ID: 8455130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:23:39.928209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.178219
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Chalk appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chalk, No. *3890:04-cr-00657-JFA-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.