Court Opinion

ID: 4444971
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-08 14:06:04.51346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:35.507266
License: Public Domain

In the Missouri Court of Appeals
                       Eastern District
                                            DIVISION FOUR

SHAWN WENZEL,                                          )        No. ED106977
                                                       )
          Appellant,                                   )        Appeal from the Circuit Court
                                                       )        of Perry County
v.                                                     )        Cause No. 17PR-CC00041
                                                       )
STATE OF MISSOURI,                                     )        Honorable Benjamin F.
                                                       )        Lewis
          Respondent.                                  )
                                                                Filed: October 8, 2019

                                                Introduction

          Shawn Wenzel (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.0351

motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We vacate the judgment

with directions to dismiss the Rule 24.035 motion because Movant’s pro se motion was

untimely.

                                                Background

          On December 12, 2014 Movant pleaded guilty to delivering or concealing a

prohibited article on the premises of a county jail, a class B felony and driving while

revoked, a class D felony. The court sentenced Movant to concurrent terms of seven years

imprisonment for the class B felony and four years imprisonment for the class D felony,

1
    All Rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2014) unless otherwise indicated
pursuant to the 120-day institutional training program under Section 559.115 RSMo. Cum.

Supp. (2014). The court also ordered this sentence be served consecutively to a seven-year

sentence from a previous case.

       On April 7, 2015 Movant completed the institutional treatment program. The court

placed Movant on probation for five years.

       On May 13, 2016 and October 7, 2016, the court found that Movant violated his

probation. In both instances, the court continued Movant’s probation with additional

conditions. On October 7, 2016 Movant also pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled

substance. On June 2, 2017 the court again found that Movant violated his probation. The

court executed Movant’s sentences which included the 2014 seven-year sentence for the

prohibited article and four-year sentence for driving while revoked.

       On August 17, 2017 Movant filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion. Movant asserted

that he was challenging his seven-year sentence for the 2014 prohibited article conviction.

Movant alleged that for this conviction he was delivered to the Department of Corrections

on June 20, 2017.

       Movant through appointed counsel filed an amended Rule 24.035 motion. In his

sole claim, Movant alleged that he was improperly charged and convicted of a class B

felony for the prohibited article. Movant asserted that the proper charge was a class A

misdemeanor and not a class B felony.

       The motion court denied Movant’s amended motion without an evidentiary

hearing. This appeal follows.

                                             2
                                                Discussion

         The time restrictions set forth in Rule 24.035 motion are “mandatory, strictly

enforced, and may not be extended.” Miley v. State, 559 S.W.3d 97, 99 (Mo. App. E.D.

2018). A movant’s failure to timely file a pro se Rule 24.035 motion constitutes a complete

waiver of the movant’s right to proceed with the post-conviction motion. Rule 24.035(b);

Dorris v. State, 360 S.W.3d 260, 266 (Mo. banc 2012).

         Rule 24.035(b) provided if no appeal of the “judgment was taken, the motion shall

be filed within 180 days of the date the person is delivered to the custody of the

[D]epartment of [C]orrections.” 2 The law is well settled that the time limitations for filing

a motion for post-conviction relief starts upon a movant’s initial delivery to the custody of

the Department of Corrections. Hall v. State, 380 S.W.3d 583, 585 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012).

This applies even in cases where pursuant to Section 559.115 the trial court remands the

movant to the Department of Corrections so the movant can enter an institutional treatment

program and then places the movant on probation upon completion of the program. Id.

“The delivery of the movant into the custody of the Missouri Department of Corrections

for a 120-day treatment program pursuant to Section 559.115 initiates the 180-day period

in which the movant may file a Rule 24.035 motion.” Langhans v. State, 501 S.W.3d 535,

538 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

         Here, the court originally sentenced Movant on December 12, 2014 for a prohibited

article and driving while revoked under the Section 559.115 institutional treatment

2
    The Missouri Supreme Court amended Rule 24.035; effective January 1, 2018 the rule provides if no
appeal of the judgment or sentence is taken “the motion shall be filed within 180 days of the date the sentence
is entered.” Rule 24.035(b) Mo. R. Crim. P. (2018) (emphasis added).

                                                      3