Court Opinion

ID: 9715544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 06:08:20.264253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:35.589811
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
Per Curiam.
The appellant, through his attorney, requests a rehearing citing again Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, which he had previously cited in his brief.
This matter was decided purely on the special facts in the case on appeal. This court does not question the holding in the Miranda case, supra. Under the facts brought out in this record, as was indicated in the Per Curiam opinion, 250 Ind. 625, 14 Ind. Dec. 413, 237 N. E. 2d *631254, heretofore handed down, the defendant came within the purview of Miranda, supra, and under the facts of the particular circumstances, was given sufficient warning.
The rehearing is, therefore, denied.
Note. — Reported in 237 N. E. 2d 254.
Rehearing Denied in 238 N. E. 2d 458.