Court Opinion

ID: 9301502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:07:52.314131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:42.038802
License: Public Domain

STRONG, Circuit Justice,
after reciting the circumstances of the case as detailed by the witnesses, referred to the act of congress of March 3, 1863 [12 Stat 756], in which it is declared that any order of the president or under his authority made at any time during the existence of the present Rebellion, shall be a defence in all courts to any action or prosecution, civil or criminal, pending or to be commenced, for any search, seizure, arrest, or imprisonment made, done, or committed, or acts omitted to be done, under and by virtue of such order or under color of any law of congress, and such defence may be made by special plea or under the general issue. He then referred to the telegraph despatches which had been sent from the secretary of war to General Cadwalader in reference to the detention of the bark A 1,— the first one, several days before the seizure, and the second ordering the release of the vessel, — -and said that the act of the secretary of war was that of the president. If, then, the jury were satisfied that the defendant did act under authority, the law was a bar to *877the recovery of damages by the plaintiff, and he had to look to Washington, either to the court of claims or to congress, for redress. The jury, after a few minutes’ deliberation, rendered a verdict for the defendant