Court Opinion

ID: 9801287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 08:47:16.761436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:52:26.164362
License: Public Domain

Sadler, J.,
concurring in judgment only.
{¶ 39} I agree that the language providing that the court “shall set a date for a hearing” as used in R.C. 2953.52(B)(1) and 2953.32(B) does not contemplate the immediate holding of a hearing as occurred in the case of John Doe. Because I view this issue as dispositive, I concur in judgment only in case No. 2012-1924. Additionally, I concur in judgment only in the denial of the requested writs in case No. 2013-0300.