Court Opinion

ID: 3950145
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:12:21.17663+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:19.253910
License: Public Domain

Appellant was convicted for permitting a game at cards to be played upon his premises, and upon premises under his control, said premises being then and there a public place, to wit, a gaming house, used for the purpose of gaming.
The recognizance recites the fact that "said Archie Williams has been convicted in this cause of a misdemeanor, to wit, permitting gaming upon his premises, in that said Archie Williams, on or about November 20, 1896, in Limestone County, Texas, did unlawfully permit a game at cards to be played upon his premises, and upon premises under his control, the said premises being then and there a public place, to wit, a gaming house, used for the purpose of gaming." This recognizance was entered into on March 20, 1897, and was therefore given under the law in *Page 545 
force prior to the late statute, changing the form of recognizances required to be given in misdemeanor appeal cases. The statute in force at the time this recognizance was given requires that said recognizance should recite the offense with which the defendant was charged in the trial court, as well as the fact that he had been convicted of said offense. See Rev. Code Crim. Proc. 1895, art. 887. And, for collated authorities, see Wills. Crim. Stats., 2 ed., art. 888, note 1.
Because the recognizance is insufficient in not reciting the offense with which appellant was charged, the appeal herein is dismissed.
Dismissed.