Court Opinion

ID: 677503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:23:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.059315
License: Public Domain

34 F.3d 1066NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel BOYD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,v.Doctor FOX;  Doctor Casrey;  Dr. Ramsey;  Doctor Marshall;Steven Hanna, Doctor, Defendants Appellees,andLarry Huffman;  Sergeant Kennedy;  Sergeant Conner, Defendants.
No. 94-6253.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 1994Decided Aug. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge.  (CA-93-7-R)
Samuel Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Sandra Morris Holleran, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, V.;   Gary Elton Tegenkamp, Wooten & Hart, P.C.;   Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Mary Christine Maggard, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Boyd v. Fox, No. CA-93-7-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED