Court Opinion

ID: 657595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:56:35+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:17.024504
License: Public Domain

9 F.3d 1543
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Mark CONVERTINO, Petitioner-Appellant,v.E. B. WRIGHT, Jr., Warden, Greenville Correctional Center;Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6723.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  October 27, 1993.Decided:  November 12, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Gregory Michael Pomije, Cooper & Davis, Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellant.
Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Convertino v. Wright, No. CA-93-51 (E.D. Va.  May 25, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED