Court Opinion

ID: 2658174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-03-28 00:02:18.441514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:15.522157
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-1236         Document: 19          Page: 1       Filed: 03/27/2014

                  NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

    United States Court of Appeals
        for the Federal Circuit
                        ______________________

                  E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                      v.

   ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., PANTECH
     WIRELESS, INC., PANTECH CO. LTD., AND
            WOODMAN LABS, INC.,
              Defendants-Appellees.
             ______________________

                        2014-1239, -1242, -1243
                        ______________________

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the
 Southern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00781-DMS-
 WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                      v.

        RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, DBA
      BLACKBERRY, AND RESEARCH IN MOTION
         CORPORATION, DBA BLACKBERRY.,
                Defendants-Appellees.
               ______________________

                                 2014-1236
Case: 14-1236     Document: 19      Page: 2    Filed: 03/27/2014

 2       E.DIGITAL CORPORATION   v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED

                   ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 Southern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00781-DMS-
 WVG, Judge Dana M. Sabraw.
                  ______________________

                       ON MOTION
                   ______________________

                         ORDER
     Upon consideration of e.Digital Corporation’s unop-
 posed motion to withdraw appeal no. 2014-1236,
       IT IS ORDERED THAT:
     (1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2014-1236 is
 dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No.
 2014-1236.
     (3) The revised official caption for 2014-1239, -1242,
 -1243 is reflected above.
                                      FOR THE COURT

                                       /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                       Daniel E. O’Toole
                                       Clerk of Court

 s19

 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2014-1236 only):
 March 27, 2014