Court Opinion

ID: 9372536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-21 20:02:59.451186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:35.953287
License: Public Domain

Electronically Filed
                                                        Supreme Court
                                                        SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                        21-FEB-2023
                                                        09:19 AM
                                                        Dkt. 20 ODMR

                          SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

           CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,

                                vs.

                THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO,
        Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit,
                  State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent.

                        ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                         (5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

            ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
 (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

          Upon consideration of the February 16, 2023 motion for

reconsideration and materials appended thereto, filed by

Petitioners Cameron and Martha Nice, pursuant to Rule 40 of the

Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP), and the record in

this matter, this court has not overlooked or misapprehended
points of law or fact.   See HRAP Rule 40(b).   Accordingly, it is

ordered that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

          DATED:   Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 21, 2023.

                                     /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
                                     /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
                                     /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
                                     /s/ Michael D. Wilson
                                     /s/ Todd W. Eddins

                                 2