Court Opinion

ID: 7521176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:54:30.924592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:33.498270
License: Public Domain

SCHWARTZ, Judge
(specially concurring).
I concur in reversal, both for the reason stated in the majority opinion and because the result reached below would be incorrect even if the photograph of the defendant later employed for identification purposes had been initially improperly secured. United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 100 S.Ct. 1244, 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Maier, 378 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.