Court Opinion

ID: 9529198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:48:44.588782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:42.395021
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
*560Henry Bauer and Phillips, Coughlin, Buell £ Phillips, Portland, for the petition.
Krause, Evans £ Lindsay, and Jack L. Kennedy, Portland, contra.
Before Warner, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Latourette and Perry, Justices.
On Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing
PERRY, J.
Our original opinion affirmed the decree of the trial court. At the time this opinion was rendered we overlooked a letter from plaintiff’s counsel stating that an error of computation had been made, and that the decree should have been in the amount of $7,006.06, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from December 11, 1951, until paid, together with costs and disbursements in the sum of $86.84.
The appealing defendants have petitioned for a rehearing, stating that we overlooked, as pointed out in their briefs, that the sum of $850 included in the judgment as entered was loaned to the defendant Eldon Mills subsequent to his agreement to secure the pre*561vious advances of funds by a mortgage upon Ms property, and that there is no evidence in the record that this latter sum was to be thus secured.
We must again confess our oversight, for we have searched the record and it is devoid of any promise to secure tMs latter amount.
The decree of the trial court should be modified by reducing the money judgment secured to the sum of $6,156.06, together with interest, costs and disbursements as above set out.
Our former opinion is corrected as herein set out, and the decree of the trial court as thus modified is .affirmed.
The petition for rehearing is denied.