Court Opinion

ID: 1008279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:37:30.730667+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:19.948101
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DENNIS ELIJAH JEMISON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CR-97-117, CA-01-395-2)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 29, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Elijah Jemison, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dennis Elijah Jemison seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   See United States v. Jemison, Nos. CR-97-117; CA-

01-395-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 29, 2002; entered Apr. 1, 2002).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2