Court Opinion

ID: 1003544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:28:02.23682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:26.842357
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7256

KEITH LAMONTE HILL,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LINDA CURTIS, Commonwealth Attorney;
CHRISTOPHER HUTTON; B. J. ROBERTS,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-99-817)

Submitted:   January 19, 2001             Decided:   February 7, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Lamonte Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Keith Lamonte Hill appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    Hill v. Curtis, No. CA-99-817 (E.D. Va. Aug.

24, 2000).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2