Court Opinion

ID: 3097336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:44:15.807409+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:00.770574
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-12-00253-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL A

                                 SEPTEMBER 27, 2012

                          DOUGLAS MARK WEST, APPELLANT

                                            v.

                           THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

            FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

             NO. 133599-2; HONORABLE PAMELA COOK SIRMON, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Appellant Douglas Mark West, appearing pro se, filed a notice of appeal on June

20, 2012, appealing his conviction for reckless driving. 1 According to the information

report filed by the county clerk, appellant was not declared indigent.

       By letter of July 18, we notified appellant that compliance with appellate rule 20.2

was necessary if he believed himself indigent and entitled to a free record on appeal.

On August 9, the county clerk filed a status report seeking an extension of time to file

the clerk’s record because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

       1
           Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.401(a) (West 2011).
clerk’s record.   The same day, we directed appellant by letter to make acceptable

payment arrangements with the county clerk by August 20. On August 21, the county

clerk filed a status report indicating appellant still had not paid or made arrangements to

pay for the clerk’s record. The report also stated the clerk had sent appellant a copy of

the extension request. Citing appellate rule 37.3(b), we notified appellant by letter of

August 23 that if the clerk’s record was not filed by September 13 due to his fault, the

appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution without further notice.              On

September 14, the county clerk filed a status report stating that appellant has not paid

or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record, and also stating the clerk has

received no correspondence from appellant.

      The record does not show appellant is indigent. Nor has appellant heeded our

direction to pay or make acceptable payment arrangements for preparation of the

clerk’s record on peril of dismissal for failure to respond. Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                         James T. Campbell
                                             Justice
Do not publish.

                                            2