Court Opinion

ID: 8071103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:27:39.983823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:14.814131
License: Public Domain

HATCH, J.
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice INGRAHAM so far as it disposes of the question arising between the railway company and the plaintiff, and also between the railway company and Gibson. I also think that the plaintiff is entitled to the judgment which it has obtained against Gibson. The form which the trial of the action assumed conferred authority upon the court to award any relief which the facts warranted; and, as it appeared that the .defendant Gibson could be made liable for a conversion of the proceeds of the bonds, it.was proper for the court to award the judgment against him which it did. I am, therefore, for the affirmance of the judgment in its entirety. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
PATTERSON and LAUGHLIN, JJ. We concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice INGRAHAM, except so far as the liability of the defendant Gibson to the plaintiff is concerned, and with respect to that we concur in the opinion oí Mr. Justice HATCH.