Court Opinion

ID: 808892
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-09-20 19:31:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:54:13.866582
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-5111    Document: 14    Page: 1   Filed: 09/20/2012

          NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

  ijliniteb ~tate1l 17
F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994). There, we explained that
the Court of Federal Claims "has no jurisdiction to adjudi-
cate any claims whatsoever under the federal criminal
code[.]" Id. at 379. In summarily disposing of the appeal
in Joshua, we stated that the position of the government
in arguing that the Court of Federal Claims lacked juris-
diction was "so clearly correct as a matter of law that no
substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal
exists." Id. at 380. So too here, summary affirmance of
the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims in dismissing
Mr. Choi's complaint is appropriate.
    Accordingly,
    IT Is ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is
        summarily affirmed.
    (2) All pending motions are dismissed.
    (3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

                                    FOR THE COURT

    SEP 20 2012                     /s/ Jan Horbaly
       Date                         Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk

                                              eotJL'F'l~PEALS
                                          u.sTHe FEDERAl. CIRCUITFOR
                                                SEP 20 ZulZ
                                                   JAN HORBAlY
                                                      CLERK
Case: 12-5111      Document: 14   Page: 4   Filed: 09/20/2012

DANNY CHOI V. US                                         4

cc: Danny Choi
    Douglas T. Hoffman, Esq.
s25