Court Opinion

ID: 2966155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:49:34.880242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:14.488181
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No. 99-1879

                        CRISANTO MENDONCA,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

              JOSEPH MEDEIROS, JAMES KILDUFF, INC.,

                      Defendants, Appellees.

           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

            [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]

                              Before

                      Selya, Circuit Judge,
                   Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                
                                
                                
                                
     Crisanto Mendonca on brief pro se.
     Michelle A. Matusewicz and Law Offices of Lawrence F.
McAuliffe on brief for appellees.

December 23, 1999

                                
                                
  
            Per Curiam.   After a thorough review of the record
  and the submissions of the parties, we affirm on the ground
  that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. 
  See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S.
  462, 476 (1983) ("[A] United States District Court has no
  authority to review final judgments of a state court in
  judicial proceedings."); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S.
  413, 415-16 (1923) (same).
            Affirmed.  1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).