Court Opinion

ID: 9667908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 01:57:30.781766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:41.441937
License: Public Domain

T. M. Burns, J.
(dissenting). I would reverse and remand for trial. There was an inadequate factual basis for finding defendant guilty of assault with intent to rob being armed. Defendant’s asserted claim of right to the money taken indicates that he did not entertain the requisite specific intent to be guilty of the crime. See People v Holcomb, 395 Mich 326, 333; 235 NW2d 343 (1975). Pursuant to GCR 1963, 785.7(3)(c), the plea should have been rejected by the court.