Court Opinion

ID: 9574536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:05:45.727978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:43.236839
License: Public Domain

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
Now on this 27th day of November, 1968, this Court having carefully consid*50ered the Petition for Rehearing filed by the Plaintiff in Error herein, and the request to intervene as amicus curiae filed by other parties, and the Court after carefully examining the record finds that all matters attempted to be raised have been dealt with directly or were not excepted to in the trial court, preserved in the record and the Plaintiff in Error’s Motion for New Trial, or presented to this Court in the original Petition in Error filed in this case. These alleged errors not being properly preserved m the record present nothing for review on appeal, and we must accordingly deny the Petition for Rehearing.
We are supported in our conclusion by virtue of the fact that the judgment and sentence was rendered on the 24th day of May, 1967, an application for post conviction review was filed on December 1, 1967, and granted on December 19, 1967. Thereafter, on the 5th day of January, 1968, the appeal was filed in this Court and although a period of seventeen months elapsed between the time of rendition of judgment and sentence in the trial court and the delivery of this Court’s opinion on the 16th day of October, 1968, no written request was ever made to amend the record nor was a written request ever made for an evidentiary hearing, until after the rendition of said opinion.
It is therefore the order of this court that the Petition for Rehearing be, and the same is hereby, denied.
Witness our hands and the seal of this Court, this 27th day of November 1968.

Approved m conference this 27th day of November, 1968.