Court Opinion

ID: 7487638
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:05:10.522586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:04.769647
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
GRIMES, A. C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.