Court Opinion

ID: 1365068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:48:18.117118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:04.361106
License: Public Domain

72 S.E.2d 750 (1952)
236 N.C. 379
STATE
v.
BRYANT.
No. 362.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 29, 1952.
*751 David J. Turlington, Jr., Clinton, for defendant-appellant. Atty. Gen. Harry McMullan, Asst. Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton, for the State.
WINBORNE, Justice.
Appeal to the Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See State v. Suddreth, 230 N.C. 754, 55 S.E.2d 690; also State v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E.2d 412; State v. Rodgers, 217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; State v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316, at page 322, 166 S.E. 292, and cases there cited. Also State v. Grass, 223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443; State v. Parker, 235 N.C. 302, 69 S.E.2d 542.
Hence under the authority of these cases the appeal in the present case is
Dismissed.