Court Opinion

ID: 4351153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-17 15:48:25.256614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:34.189495
License: Public Domain

Denied and Opinion Filed December 13, 2018

                                                 In The
                                  Court of Appeals
                           Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                         No. 05-18-01203-CV

                                IN RE GOLDFARB, PLLC, Relator

                   Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court
                                     Dallas County, Texas
                              Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-03747

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION
                         Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart
                                     Opinion by Justice Stoddart
        Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which relator complains of

the trial court’s order severing the claims it asserted in its petition in intervention. To be entitled

to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion

and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,

135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has

not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines

relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

181203F.P05
                                                    /Craig Stoddart/
                                                    CRAIG STODDART
                                                    JUSTICE