Court Opinion

ID: 5718135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:05:25.914309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:39.628089
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J), rendered March 25, 2004, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacat*934ing the conviction of assault in the first degree and the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and a new trial is ordered on the charge of assault in the first degree, as charged in count two of indictment No. 720/03 as to the defendant.
The defendant correctly argues that the Supreme Court erred in refusing to charge the jury as to justification pursuant to Penal Law § 35.15 (2) with respect to the assault charge of which he was convicted under an acting in concert theory (see People v Fermín, 36 AD3d 934 [2007] [decided herewith]). Contrary to the People’s contention, the issue is preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Edwards, 95 NY2d 486, 491 n 2 [2000]; People v Duncan, 177 AD2d 187, 191 [1992]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the defendant’s guilt was proven by legally sufficient evidence.
In view of our determination, we do not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Rivera, J.P, Krausman, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.