Court Opinion

ID: 9722655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 09:43:33.240745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:38.049645
License: Public Domain

KAUS, P. J.,
Dissenting. — This case proves that reasonable judges can differ on whether a subjective expectation of privacy is objectively reasonable or a,legal pip edrearn. Personally, I should have thought that regardless of the primary purpose of the curtain, it was objectively reasonable for defendant to expect that police officers would leave him alone for the two. or three minutes it took him to get his quarter’s worth of “entertainment.”
I therefore dissent.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 21, 1977. Tobriner, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.