Court Opinion

ID: 9394278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-12 21:00:27.189962+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:58.605397
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1966      Doc: 24         Filed: 05/11/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-1966

        CONSUELO MARIA ROMERO-AREVALO,

                            Petitioner,

                     v.

        MERRICK B. GARLAND,

                            Respondent.

                     On Appeal from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

        Submitted: March 14, 2023                                         Decided: May 11, 2023

        Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior
        Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Jose Rafael Campos, LAW OFFICES OF CAMPOS & ASSOCIATES,
        Wheaton, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant
        Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Abigail E. Leach, Office of
        Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
        Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1966      Doc: 24         Filed: 05/11/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Consuelo Maria Romero-Arevalo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

        review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal

        from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of

        removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).                We have

        thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling

        contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and

        that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

        478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by

        the Board. In re Romero-Arevalo (B.I.A. Aug. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                               PETITION DENIED

                                                     2