Court Opinion

ID: 8439348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:20:58.995205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.912143
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Stanley McKinney, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKinney, No. 6:07-cr-00283-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.