Court Opinion

ID: 1019358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:34:27.151459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:49.963891
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-7185

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MITCHELL FRANKS, Warden; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE,
F.A.; ROYCE MARSHALL, Property Officer,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
05-1739-RDB)

Submitted: May 16, 2006                          Decided: May 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.           We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we

affirm   for   the   reasons   stated   by   the   district   court.   See

Pearson v. Franks, No. CA-05-1739-RDB (D. Md. July 5, 2005).           We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -