Court Opinion

ID: 1009466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:56:28.869933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:29:13.749382
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7684

TENNIS ZEKE HATFIELD,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM M. FOX, Warden,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-594-2)

Submitted:   December 19, 2002            Decided:   January 7, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tennis Zeke Hatfield, Appellant Pro Se. Heather D. Foster, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tennis Zeke Hatfield seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Hatfield has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.   See Hatfield v. Fox, No.

CA-01-594-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2002).    Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2