Court Opinion

ID: 9715625
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 06:10:29.657163+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:36.409579
License: Public Domain

UHLENHOPP, Justice
(concurring specially) .
I concur in affirmance of the judgment on the ground that the papers in this particular case do not state facts or circumstances from which a jury could reasonably find that due care required a warning. But I am not prepared to say that facts and circumstances could never exist which would give rise to such a duty. If due care requires a warning, the State cannot avoid liability on the basis of a discretionary function. Stanley v. State, 197 N.W.2d 599 (Iowa).
MASON and LeGRAND, JJ., join in this concurrence.