Court Opinion

ID: 9736263
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 18:48:59.139957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:06.947474
License: Public Domain

KELLEY, Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. I am unable to discern any material distinction between the private citizen “tip” in this case and the private citizen “tip” in our recent case Marben v. State, Dep’t of Public Safety, 294 N.W.2d 697 (Minn.1980). In both cases the officers verified the “tip.” In neither case did the officers observe erratic driving. In both cases the vehicles were as described by the tipster informant and on the highway at a place the tipster said they were. I would reverse.
PETERSON, Justice
(dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice KELLEY.
*557SCOTT, Justice
(dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice KELLEY.