Court Opinion

ID: 8416434
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:29:40.050846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:16.326492
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Juan Hugo Diaz-Barajas appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry of a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Diaz-Barajas’ counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
*47Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.