Court Opinion

ID: 1423771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:04:06.512987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:06:31.896706
License: Public Domain

219 S.W.3d 280 (2007)
Ronald BRYANT, Claimant/Appellant,
v.
COLOR ART PRINTING, Employer/Respondent,
Missouri Printing Industries Trust, Insurer/Respondent, and
Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party.
No. ED 88749.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 10, 2007.
Susan L. Brown, Brown and Crouppen, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Mary Anne Lindsey, Robert L. Hinson, Evans & Dixon, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondents Color Art Printing & Missouri Printing Industries Trust.
Kevin A. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Second Injury Fund.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).