Court Opinion

ID: 9720796
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 08:41:35.645528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:21.340034
License: Public Domain

On petition for rehearing.
STRUTZ, Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a petition for rehearing in this case, in which he takes issue, with some of the statements of fact as ser forth in our opinion. The court has carefully re-examined the record, and finds j most of the objections of the plaintiff to be without foundation or merit.
However, our opinion in any event would be the same. There is no reasonable explanation, consistent with the plaintiff’s own evidence, which must be taken as true, which would account for the accident, without the necessity of imputing contributory negligence to the plaintiff.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
SATHRE, C. J., and MORRIS, BURKE and TEIGEN, JJ., concur.