Court Opinion

ID: 9486620
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 11:54:34.137622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:50.075276
License: Public Domain

ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by the petitioner-appellant and the response filed by respondents-appellees, a vote of the active members of the court was requested and a majority of the judges in active service have voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judges Cudahy, Ripple and Rov-ner voted to grant rehearing en banc. All of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the request for rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is hereby DENIED.