Court Opinion

ID: 8985867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 11:45:09.937816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:10:46.845543
License: Public Domain

C. A. 4th Cir.;
C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 456 F. 2d 469 ;
C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 457 F. 2d 365; and
C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 465 F. 2d 727. Motions of respondents for leave to- proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Michigan v. Payne, ante, p. 47, and Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, ante, p. 17.
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments.