Court Opinion

ID: 4866316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 02:18:42.188993+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:10.075493
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence. With respect to the assertion that the trial court should have conducted a Nelson hearing we note that the appellant only expressed a general dissatisfaction with appointed counsel and that a Nelson inquiry was unnecessary. See, e.g., Clayton v. State, 953 So.2d 758 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 966 So.2d 965 (Fla.2007).
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, C.J., MONACO and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.