Court Opinion

ID: 9452770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 17:51:24.655307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:33:21.081478
License: Public Domain

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
Appellant has filed an application for rehearing, as is its prerogative, setting out a quotation attributed to Charles Evans Hughes, written in the interim between his two terms of service on the Supreme Court: “Petitions for rehearing are an improvement on the tavern as counsel may enjoy the luxury of telling the court to its face what is thought of its opinion.”
It is our prerogative, and duty, to study and consider the application and adjudge whether it has merit or whether it is a mere enjoyment of the luxury described by Justice Hughes. We have done so. The application is overruled.