Court Opinion

ID: 3110850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:51:37.321189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:04.767088
License: Public Domain

02-12-296-CV

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
 

 
 
NO. 02-12-00296-CV
 
 

In re Jimmy Dale Luttrell

 

RELATOR

 
 
------------
 
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM
OPINION[1]
                                                       ------------
The
court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.  Because relator
is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court, this court is of the
opinion that this petition should be dismissed.[2]
  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
PANEL: 
DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.
 
DELIVERED: 
July 31, 2012

          [1]See
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

                [2]See Ex
parte Bohannan,
350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); In re Riley, No.
02-11-00052-CV, 2011 WL 1103829, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 24, 2011,
orig. proceeding).