Court Opinion

ID: 9689102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 18:19:52.213968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:29.560390
License: Public Domain

*416O’Hara, J.
(dissenting). I am uninstrueted in Fetridge’s law and G-umperson’s law. Insofar as negligence law is concerned I accept the statement of the Court of Appeals that:*
“The record here discloses the only unsafe feature of the place of discharge was that the place was not where Mrs. Jaxon expected it to be. * * * We hold as a matter of law that no actionable negligence is shown on this record.”
It would be somewhat unreasonable to require a bus driver in one of the nation’s largest metropolises to bring his vehicle to rest at the same spot in a busy intersection every time he stops there.
I vote to affirm the order of the Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in its opinion.
Dethmers, C. J., and Kelly, J., concurred with O’Hara, J.

 3 Mich App 722, 724.