Court Opinion

ID: 9629046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 09:36:20.631931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:07:15.011083
License: Public Domain

Dolliver, J.
(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur in the result of the majority and in all particulars of the majority opinion except that which is contained in part VII, to which I dissent. My views on the admissibility of hypnotically induced testimony are contained in State v. Martin, 101 Wn.2d 713, 684 P.2d 651 (1984) and need not be repeated here. In any retrial of this case, I would require the procedures which I outlined in Martin to be followed.
Utter and Dimmick, JJ., concur with Dolliver, J.
Reconsideration denied September 24, 1984.