Court Opinion

ID: 9352465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-06 17:00:28.078313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:50.720853
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 22-1931
                       ___________________________

                                  Angela Basham

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

 Midland Funding LLC; Gamache & Myers, P.C.; Midland Credit Management,
                                 Inc.

                     lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                 ____________

                         Submitted: December 29, 2022
                            Filed: January 6, 2023
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Angela Basham appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to
three companies she accused of harassing her while trying to collect credit-card

      1
       The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
debts. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal,
we conclude that there are no material facts in dispute and the debt collectors are
entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 2 See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921
(8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing a grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56(c)(1) (instructing parties to cite “materials in the record” when trying to
show that a fact is “genuinely disputed” at the summary-judgment stage). We
accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

      2
          We also deny Basham’s motion to appoint appellate counsel.
                                        -2-