Court Opinion

ID: 9832506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:58:00.01536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:47.528044
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
Upon further consideration, we have concluded that the judgment below should be reversed and judgment here rendered for appellant. The application signed by Frank Kreller for admission in the lodge at Fort Worth, as well as that signed by him as Frank Everett' Oreller, for admission in the lodge at Marion, Iowa, had “Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen” printed in large type, capitalized, at the top of the page. It is admitted that Frank Krel-ler and Frank Everett Oreller are one and *126the same person, and that Frank Kreller, going under the name of Frank Everett Creller, formerly belonged to the lodge at Marion, Iowa. Therefore it is practically impossible that, in making the application for membership in the Fort Worth lodge, the applicant did not know that “B. of R. T.” meant the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, and that, in answering the question as to whether he had ever been a member of the “B. of R. T.,” “No,” he meant to say that he had never been a member of the appellant order.
The appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, and the judgment below is reversed, and judgment is here rendered for appellant. All costs are adjudged against appellee.