Court Opinion

ID: 5898916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 03:14:10.292375+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:36.307117
License: Public Domain

Judgment, Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), rendered July 8, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). As to each of the two incidents, there is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its evaluation of inconsistencies in testimony. To the extent defendant is claiming that the lineup procedures were unduly suggestive, we find that claim to be without merit (see generally People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]).
Defendant did not preserve his challenge to the court’s charge, and his related challenge to the prosecutor’s summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. The court adequately instructed the jury to consider the evidence of the two crimes separately, and the challenged portion of the prosecutor’s summation was responsive to the defense summation.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Gische, JJ.