Court Opinion

ID: 57924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 02:20:30+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:41.132193
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  Plaintiff-Appellant Rose Pickett, proceeding
  
   pro se
  
  on appeal, seeks reversal of the final judgment of the district court granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss
   
   *638
   
  and motion for summary judgment, dismissing Pickett’s action with prejudice. That action is grounded in claims of employment discrimination based on race, sex, age, and retaliation in violation of applicable federal and state statutes.
 

  We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, including the careful and exhaustive Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court signed on January 5, 2007, as a result of which we are satisfied that the district court not only committed no reversible error, but properly and correctly granted and rendered the judgment from which Pickett appeals. For the reasons set forth by the district court in its said Memorandum Opinion and Order, the judgment of that court is, in all respects,
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.