Court Opinion

ID: 5843706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 23:39:03.395915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:51.334600
License: Public Domain

Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Pending plaintiff wife’s motion in this matrimonial action to strike paragraph "twelfth” of defendant’s answer and counterclaim, defendant husband served an amended pleading deleting the objectionable allegations and cross-moved to strike the case from the calendar because of the incorrectness of material facts set forth in the certificate of readiness filed by plaintiff, and for counsel fees pursuant to section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law. Plaintiff appeals from an order of Special Term which denied her motion to strike paragraph "twelfth” and to dismiss defendant’s cross motion and granted defendant’s motion to strike the case from the Trial Calendar and directed plaintiff to pay the sum of $150 for "court costs per 8202 CPLR and attorney’s fees”. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss paragraph "twelfth” of the original answer and counterclaim is rendered moot since the defect in the original was cured by the amended pleading (3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3025.07). Further, defendant is not entitled to costs on his cross motion or to counsel fees since the court failed to fix costs (CPLR 8202) and defendant made no showing of circumstances sufficient to permit the court to exercise its discretion under section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law (as amd by L 1980, ch 281, § 10) (see 11B Zett-Edmonds-Schwartz, NY Civ Prac, par 38.06, subd [4], par [a]; Albanese v Albanese, 75 AD2d 987). Accordingly, the order is modified by vacating decretal paragraphs one and three. (Appeal from order of Ontario Supreme Court—strike from calendar.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.