Court Opinion

ID: 2931032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:03:45.873671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:35.614022
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1,
2005.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-05-00038-CR
____________
 
CHARLES EDWARD BLOOMER,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 232nd District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
957,460
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of
aggravated robbery.  On May 26, 2004, the
trial court entered an order, deferring adjudication of guilt and placing
appellant on community supervision for four years.  The state subsequently filed a motion to
adjudicate.  On January 7, 2005, the
trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced appellant to confinement
for 12 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice.  Appellant filed a timely notice
of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed September 1, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson,
Frost, and Seymore. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).