Court Opinion

ID: 223127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-13 00:02:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:58.570732
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             AUG 12 2011

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-30052

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00113-SEH

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
JUVENILE FEMALE,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Montana
                     Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted August 11, 2011 **

Before:        THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges

       Juvenile Female appeals from the district court order requiring her to remain

in detention until age 19. The sentence was imposed after the district court

adjudged her to be guilty of an act of juvenile delinquency. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Juvenile Female’s counsel has filed a brief stating

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    10-30052