Court Opinion

ID: 931090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-25 00:00:56.254474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:03.673525
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 24 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-50387

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00067-GAF

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
FAUSTO RENATO QUEVEDO, a.k.a.
Apple, a.k.a. Fausto Quevedo Guarcas,
a.k.a. Calvin Martinez, a.k.a. Raul
Martinez, a.k.a. Frausto Quevedo,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Central District of California
                     Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted June 18, 2013 **

Before:        TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

       Fausto Renato Quevedo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being an illegal

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Quevedo’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Quevedo the opportunity to file

a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     12-50387