Court Opinion

ID: 2166625
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:30:49.347124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:56.187007
License: Public Domain

240 S.W.3d 202 (2007)
Elizabeth WEBER, Claimant/Appellant,
v.
IBT, INC., Employer/Respondent, and
Virginia Surety Co., Inc., Insurer/Respondent.
No. ED 89683.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
December 11, 2007.
Charles W. Bobinette, Uthoff, Graeber, Bobinette & Blanke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Todd L. Beekley, Archer, Lassa & McHugh, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming *203 the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).