Court Opinion

ID: 1006008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:04:54.086564+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:43.302398
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM MCKINLEY JACKSON BAILEY,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CR-98-1, CA-00-742-7)

Submitted:   November 29, 2001            Decided:   December 5, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Jackson Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William M. Jackson Bailey appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Bailey, Nos. CR-98-1; CA-00-

742-7 (W.D. Va. May 11, 2001).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2