Court Opinion

ID: 9818056
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 05:13:27.283789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:02.376327
License: Public Domain

ANDERSON,
concurring:
With one observation, I concur in the per curiam opinion. My reading of the record reveals that there is little or no evidence that Kurtts’s decision to resign was made before Oviedo asked if she wanted her final paycheck. In any event, there clearly are genuine issues of fact in that regard. A reasonable jury could find that Oviedo’s question posed a Hobson’s choice and was not a reasonable response to Kurtts’s complaint. Thus, I agree that there remain genuine issues of fact as to whether CSG exercised reasonable care in responding to Kurtts’s complaint.