Court Opinion

ID: 177976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-10-26 17:21:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:25:43.645956
License: Public Domain

Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          October 26, 2010
                                     No. 10-30163
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TYRUS MIGUEL COOPER,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Middle District of Louisiana
                              USDC No. 3:04-CR-138-1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tyrus Miguel Cooper
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cooper has filed a response. He has also filed
a motion for the appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the record,
counsel’s brief, and Cooper’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010

                                 No. 10-30163

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Cooper’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

                                       2