Court Opinion

ID: 1008492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:41:07.631899+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:58.674915
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Charlena Singleton appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to reopen her case and her motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Singleton v. Cannon,
  
  No. CA-99-3636-2-18 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.