Court Opinion

ID: 9928718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-31 21:08:04.252778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:32.537818
License: Public Domain

People v Gjenashaj (2024 NY Slip Op 00432)

People v Gjenashaj

2024 NY Slip Op 00432

Decided on January 31, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 31, 2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-03740
 (Ind. No. 137/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vLori Gjenashaj, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Russ Altman-Merino of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Timothy Pezzoli and James J. Gandia of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mario F. Mattei, J.), imposed April 21, 2022, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).
DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court