Court Opinion

ID: 6331978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-15 00:00:21.432949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:16.014237
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40387     Document: 00516280665         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/14/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                      April 14, 2022
                                  No. 21-40387
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jermaine Lanie Codrington,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:19-CR-165-1

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jermaine Lanie Codrington has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Codrington has filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40387     Document: 00516280665          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/14/2022

                                   No. 21-40387

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as
   well as Codrington’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
   the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2