Court Opinion

ID: 6123338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 20:12:24.582632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:20.647158
License: Public Domain

INGALLS, J.,
dissenting.
This is an appeal from the decree of the surrogate, disallowing a claim asserted by the plaintiff' as receiver of the Third Avenue Savings Bank, on the ground that it was barred by the short statute of limitations. The referee, to whom the matter was referred by the surrogate, has reported the evidence taken by him, with his conclusion that the claim has become barred by such statute of limitation, and we are satisfied that he has decided correctly. The surrogate has confirmed the report of the referee and allowed the sum of $275 in lieu of costs and expenses to be paid out of the fund in the hands of the receiver. It is contended by the appellant that the surrogate was not authorized to impose ■such costs. We do not- agree with the appellant in this proposition. The statute of 1870, chapter 359, section 9, provides as follows: “The surrogate of said county (New York) may grant allowances, in lieu of costs, to counsel in any proceeding before him in the same manner as are now prescribed by the Code of Procedure in civil actions.” The receiver voluntarily instituted the proceedings to collect the claim and submitted to the jurisdiction of the surrogate, and we perceive no substantial reason why the surrogate did not possess the authority to make the allowance of costs, which do not seem to be unreasonable in amount, nor does it appear inequitable to charge the same upon the fund in the hands of the receiver who has occasioned them.
The decree must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements, to be paid by the receiver out of any funds in his hands belonging to the trust.
*624■ Judgment modified by reducing allowance to $162.50, and 'affirmed as modified, without costs.