Court Opinion

ID: 2779575
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-16 17:02:53.424788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:55:29.416140
License: Public Domain

In the Supreme Court of Georgia

                                           Decided: February 16, 2015

                      S14A1524. SPRIGGS v. THE STATE.

      BLACKWELL, Justice.

      Following his entry of a plea of guilty but mentally ill,1 Robert Timothy

Spriggs, Jr. was convicted in October 2012 of murder and several other crimes

and sentenced. About seven months later, Spriggs filed a motion to withdraw his

plea, but the trial court dismissed his motion as untimely. After the time passed

in which Spriggs might have appealed as of right from the dismissal of his

motion to withdraw, Spriggs filed another motion, this one seeking leave to take

an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of the motion to withdraw. The trial

court, however, denied that motion. Spriggs now appeals from the denial of his

motion for leave to take an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of his motion

to withdraw. We affirm.

      1
          See OCGA § 17-7-131 (g).
      We have recognized the right of a defendant to appeal from the refusal of

a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, see Caine v. State, 266 Ga. 421, 421-422

(467 SE2d 570) (1996), and we likewise have recognized that, when the right

to appeal from such a refusal is frustrated by a denial of effective assistance of

counsel to which the defendant is constitutionally entitled, an out-of-time appeal

is the appropriate remedy. See Carter v. Johnson, 278 Ga. 202, 205 (2) (599

SE2d 170) (2004). See also Cobb v. State, 284 Ga. 74, 74 (663 SE2d 262)

(2008). The problem is, a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty must be filed in

the term of court in which the defendant is sentenced, and after the expiration

of that term, “the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the

plea.” Dupree v. State, 279 Ga. 613, 614 (619 SE2d 608) (2005) (citation

omitted). Spriggs did not file his motion to withdraw until several terms of court

after the conclusion of the term in which he was sentenced. See OCGA § 15-6-3

(33) (terms of court for Rome Judicial Circuit). As such, his motion to withdraw

was an untimely one over which the trial court lacked jurisdiction, see Dupree,

279 Ga. at 614, and Spriggs was not entitled to the assistance of counsel in

connection with such an untimely motion. See Barnes v. State, 293 Ga. 365, 366

(744 SE2d 795) (2013). And in any event, Spriggs cannot show that he was

                                        2
prejudiced in any way by the allegedly ineffective assistance of his counsel as

to an appeal from the dismissal of his motion to withdraw precisely because the

trial court clearly did not err when it dismissed that untimely motion, see

Dupree, 279 Ga. at 614, and if Spriggs had taken a timely appeal from the

dismissal, the dismissal would have been affirmed. Consequently, the trial court

did not err when it denied Spriggs an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of

his untimely motion to withdraw his plea.

      Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

                                       3