Court Opinion

ID: 992153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:47:28.441814+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:50.469950
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7393

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REGINA KAYE GOODIN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District
Judge. (CR-92-10-MU, CA-95-59-5-MU)

Submitted:   May 1, 1997                     Decided:   May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam.

Regina Kaye Goodin, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Goodin, Nos. CR-92-10-MU, CA-95-59-5-MU
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. We further deny Goodin's motions for oral argument and for

appointment of counsel.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2