Court Opinion

ID: 991707
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:40:47.659123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.977480
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7192

RICKEY R. LLOYD,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

TALMADGE BARNETT; J. J. CLARK,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-95-519-5-BO)

Submitted:   February 27, 1997            Decided:   March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Associate
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd
v. Barnett, No. CA-95-519-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 12, 1996). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2