Court Opinion

ID: 3151877
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-11-04 15:28:44.031994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:33.379967
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-83,882-01

                  EX PARTE ROGELIO CORTEZ MARTINEZ, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
            CAUSE NO. 2011-DCR-02120-C IN THE 197TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM CAMERON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction.        Martinez v. State, No. 13-12-00161-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus

Christi–Edinburg Mar. 28, 2013).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that he was convicted based on false testimony and

that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The trial court entered a timely order designating

issues, but this application was forwarded to this Court before the trial court could complete its fact

finding. Therefore, we remand this application, so the trial court can complete its fact finding.
                                                                                                        2

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Weinstein, 421 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte

Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts

are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to

respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial court may use any means

set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely

on its personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s

conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings and

conclusions as to whether Applicant’s due process rights were violated because he was convicted

based on false testimony. The trial court shall also make any other findings and conclusions that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 4, 2015
Do not publish