Court Opinion

ID: 1890922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:44:23.037476+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:29.684792
License: Public Domain

854 So.2d 296 (2003)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Patrick KENNEDY.
No. 2003-KK-2269.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
August 14, 2003.
Reconsideration denied.
CALOGERO, C.J., concurs in the denial and assigns reasons.
CALOGERO, Chief Justice, concurs in the denial and assigns reasons.
My outset reservation in this case was a concern that the denial of the defendant's stay request and of his writ application might be viewed as blessing the merits of the state's position on the issue presented. Nonetheless, I agreed with the disposition denying the writ application because a writ denial would not foreclose the defendant from raising the issue on appeal should he be convicted and the death penalty be imposed. In the denial of the defendant's application for reconsideration, I perceive that the majority is of a similar mind-set with regard to the defendant's ability to re-raise the issue on appeal. In hindsight, now that the defendant cites an Oregon appeals court case that purports to support his argument on the ex post facto issue, I would have preferred that the court had taken up the case to resolve the issue prior to commencement of trial. Notwithstanding, I concur in the denial of the application for reconsideration because a majority of this court has declined to consider applications for reconsideration of writ denials in interlocutory criminal matters, citing La. Sup.Ct. Rule IX, Section 6, even though I have previously indicated that I am of the opinion that an application for reconsideration would be available in such circumstances. See, e.g., State v. Jones, 466 So.2d 453 (La.1985) (Calogero, J, dissenting); State v. Brown, 365 So.2d 228 (La.1978) (Calogero, J., dissenting).