Court Opinion

ID: 9675190
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:44:19.710918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:32.204612
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing
In our opinion we stated that in overruling the point that the jury verdict was •against the weight of the evidence we had considered all the evidence relied upon by the State to sustain this point. We then proceeded to give the substance of this •evidence as found in the brief for the State.
The State' now complains that we did not, in deciding this point, consider the evidence which its counsel made use of in orally arguing the case upon submission, a summation of which was later filed.
We did consider such evidence and all the ■evidence, but since the State did not deem it of sufficient importance to include the evidence referred to in its brief we did not •deem it of sufficient importance to include it in our opinion.
The motion is overruled.
Motion overruled.