Court Opinion

ID: 9697561
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:21:12.520717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:41.248096
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion by
Price, J.:
I concur in the result reached by the majority but must note specifically that I do not agree with the discussion or conclusion reached as to the seizure of the 14 cases seized from within the building. I would hold the seizure of all the Cases to have been proper. This I believe to be so since the first officer had not arrested appellant prior to seeing the 14 cases in plain view in the apartment, where the officer was invited by appellant for the purpose of showing a purchase receipt.
I would affirm the judgment of sentence on the basis of all of the evidence.
Watkins, P.J., and Jacobs, J., join in this concurring opinion.