Court Opinion

ID: 215026
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-04-19 18:20:23+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:31.976461
License: Public Domain

Case: 10-40244 Document: 00511450126 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011

        IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                              FILED
                                                                April 19, 2011
                               No. 10-40244
                             c/w No. 10-40291                   Lyle W. Cayce
                            Conference Calendar                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARLIN ISOU MUNOZ-OYUELA,

                                         Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/ No. 10-40291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARLIN ESAU OYUELA-MUNOS, also known as Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela,

                                         Defendant-Appellant

                Appeals from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 1:09-CR-1471-1
                          USDC No. 1:08-CR-1396-1
     Case: 10-40244 Document: 00511450126 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011

                                       No. 10-40244
                                     c/w No. 10-40291

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Munoz-Oyuela has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

                                              2