Court Opinion

ID: 4176397
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-09 19:14:14.958254+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:12.439852
License: Public Domain

People v Higgins (2017 NY Slip Op 04722)

People v Higgins

2017 NY Slip Op 04722

Decided on June 9, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 9, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

815 KA 15-02149

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vSHANE D. HIGGINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
THEODORE A. BRENNER, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered June 18, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and we conclude that the valid waiver encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255-256; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).
Entered: June 9, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court