Court Opinion

ID: 9881444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-02 18:00:32.996319+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:17.428751
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40226        Document: 00516915356             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/02/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                     ____________                                     FILED
                                                                                October 2, 2023
                                      No. 23-40226                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                    Summary Calendar                                  Clerk
                                    ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Salazar,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 1:22-CR-1164-1
                     ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio
   Gonzalez-Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Salazar has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40226      Document: 00516915356          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/02/2023

                                    No. 23-40226

   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, we
   note that the judgment contains a clerical error in that it lists the incorrect
   title of the United States Code under which the offense of conviction is
   provided. This offense falls under Title 8 of the United States Code, not
   Title 18, and thus the judgment should identify the statute of conviction as
   8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1).
          Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the
   district court for the limited purposed of correcting the judgment to list the
   correct statute of conviction. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

                                         2