Court Opinion

ID: 3799477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:42:33.88754+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:17:48.772378
License: Public Domain

The plaintiff in error, James Stevenson, was convicted in the county court of Garvin *Page 108 
county on a charge that he did have "in his possession spirituous, vinous, malt, and fermented liquors, with the intent to barter, sell, give away, and otherwise furnish the same to others," and his punishment assessed at a fine of $150 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected in this court on the 15th day of March, 1916. No briefs have been filed by counsel on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.
In the case of Smith v. State, 9 Okla. Crim. 15, 130 P. 517, it is said:
"When a petition in error and case-made are filed in this court, it is the duty of counsel to prepare and file briefs or appear and orally argue any assignments of error relied upon for reversal. When this is not done, the appeal is treated as abandoned, and in the absence of fundamental error, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed for want of prosecution."
We have examined the information and the instructions of the court, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal.
The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.
DOYLE, P.J., and BRETT, J., concur. *Page 109