Court Opinion

ID: 6152552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 16:06:07.984403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:05.814625
License: Public Domain

O’Brien, S.:
On March 3, 1921, the deceased executed a will in duplicate at the office of his attorney. The original of this will he retained, and the duplicate original he left with his attorney. He died November 15, 1924. After his death the will retained by him was found in his safe deposit box at the Eighty-sixth street branch of the Corn Exchange Safe Deposit Company. On December 8, 1924, this will was offered for probate. Thereafter the widow, Mary A. Cronin, appeared, and filed objections to the will, on the ground that it was revoked by the testator and, therefore, was not valid as his last will and testament. On the trial of the issues raised by the objections the following facts were proved:
Several lines were drawn with ink through the signature of the testator and the words “ Void J. M. Cronin ” written underneath. Lines were drawn through the signatures of the three witnesses to the will and also through their respective addresses. On the part of the cover which is folded over the top of the front page of the will appears the following written with ink: “ Must not be probated — other will to be arranged. J. M. C.” On the back or cover of the will is written: “ Void not to be probated. J. M. Cronin. Oct. 8, 1924, J. M. C.” By several witnesses it was shown on the trial that these notations on the will are in the handwriting of the deceased, and that the initials and signatures are those of Jeremiah M. Cronin. The due execution of the will was properly testified to by the witnesses.
Thus the question presented is:-Was such will revoked? These witnesses testified that at the time of the execution of the will the cross-cuts and writings described above were not on the instrument. The evidence is that the testator had exclusive access to the safe deposit box in which the will was found. When this box was opened and the will taken therefrom, it contained the writings above referred to. The court is of the opinion that the testator crossed out the signature on the will and wrote the words “ Void not to be probated ” and the other writings heretofore referred to with intent to cancel and revoke such will. (Matter of Barnes, 76 Misc. 382; Matter of Parsons, 119 id. 26; affd., 204 App. Div. 879; affd., 236 N. Y. 580; Matter of Field, 109 Misc. 409.)
A decree may, therefore, be submitted on notice, denying probate to the instrument offered as the last will and testament of Jeremiah M. Cronin, on the ground that the same has been revoked.