Court Opinion

ID: 2962206
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:54:11.298988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:06.218419
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 16, 1993     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-1480                                  CHRISTOPHER A. WOOD,                                     Petitioner,                                          v.                       IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,                                     Respondent.                                 ____________________                          ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER                         OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS                                 ____________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                         Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.                                              ______________                                 ____________________            Frank  W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Robert Kendall, Jr.,            ________________                              ___________________        Assistant Director, and Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Attorney, Office of                                _________________________        Immigration  Litigation, Civil  Division,  Department  of Justice,  on        brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   We have reviewed the record  and find                      __________            no  basis to  disturb  the  Board's  decision  upholding  the            immigration  judge's  decision to  deny  discretionary relief            from deportation.   Nor was  there any unfairness  in denying            appellant   an  indefinite   continuance   and  holding   the            deportation hearing  at a  correctional facility.   Singh  v.                                                                _____            McGrath, 104 F.2d 122 (9th  Cir. 1939), cert. dismissed,  308            _______                                 _______________            U.S. 629 (1940);  Wlodinger v. Reimer, 103 F.2d  435 (2d Cir.                              _________    ______            1939).                      Affirmed.                      ________