Court Opinion

ID: 8608272
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 05:33:21.937843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:18.381664
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
On December 14, 2006, this court ordered petitioner to file with this court a copy of his legalization application. To date, petitioner has not responded to the order to show cause.
Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.