Court Opinion

ID: 21420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:44:24+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:22.341487
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-50963
                         Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ LUIS VARGAS-RIOS,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. EP-99-CR-795-DB
                       --------------------
                           June 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     José Luis Vargas-Rios argues that the district court erred

in refusing to adjust his offense level based on his minimal role

in the offense.   Vargas argues that the district court failed to

make factual findings to support its decision.

     Vargas knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal

his sentence in his plea agreement, except for three expressly

reserved issues, which are not raised by his appeal.    See United

States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994).   Therefore,

the issue raised by Vargas is not subject to review.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 99-50963
                                -2-

     This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).   It is

therefore dismissed.   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

     DISMISSED.