Court Opinion

ID: 2873700
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 05:00:16.835936+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:06.515216
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-06-00228-CR

                                   Mario Salomon, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
          NO. 21099, HONORABLE EDWARD P. MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               In March 2005, appellant Mario Salomon was placed on deferred adjudication

supervision after he pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See Tex. Penal Code

Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2006). One year later, after appellant pleaded true to the violations

alleged in the State’s motion to adjudicate, the court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to ten

years’ imprisonment. This appeal followed.

               Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137
(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and the appellate record and

filed a pro se brief.

                We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing

in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

                The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

                                              __________________________________________

                                              W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: January 22, 2007

Do Not Publish

                                                 2