Court Opinion

ID: 9765077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 03:50:08.990889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:04.745509
License: Public Domain

SPAETH, Judge,
concurring:
I agree that the order of the lower court should be affirmed, but only because this court is bound by the Supreme Court’s adoption of, and adherence to, the English rule; were the question open for this court’s examination, I might be persuaded that this rule should be abandoned in favor of the rule stated in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 674 (1977). See Garcia v. Wall & Ochs, Inc., 256 Pa.Super. 74, 79, 389 A.2d 607, 610 (1978) (SPAETH, J., concurring).