Court Opinion

ID: 2977061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-22 18:02:04.516406+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:38:43.241199
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Following an eleven-car derailment, plaintiff railway sued the repair facility that serviced its railcar seven years prior to the accident. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants because it concluded, inter alia, that plaintiffs could not establish that defendants’ alleged negligence proximately caused the derailment.
 

  After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that issuance of a panel opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. Thus, we affirm the district court’s well-reasoned decision for the reasons stated in that court’s summary judgment opinion and order of September 18, 2007, 2007 WL 2746673, and its opinion and order of October 29, 2007, 2007 WL 3224235, denying plaintiffs motion for reconsideration.
 

  AFFIRMED.