Court Opinion

ID: 1008168
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:36:06.465847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:29.137697
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Anthony J. Rankine appeals the district court’s order: granting Kako Rankine and the Third Party Defendants’ motions to dismiss; granting the motions for sanctions but deferring a ruling on the amount of sanctions; dismissing Anthony Rankine’s complaint and amended complaint; deferring a ruling on the motion for costs and attorney’s fees; denying as moot Kako Rankine’s and the Third Party Defendants’ remaining motions; remanding the matter to the state court; and imposing an injunction on Anthony Rankine. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Rankine v. Rankine,
  
  No. CA-01-79-5-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2002). We deny Rankine’s motion to stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.