Court Opinion

ID: 994508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:24:03.938346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.390997
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

NAMOND EARL WILLIAMS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge;
Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-135-K, CA-97-1256-
JFM)

Submitted:   March 12, 1998                 Decided:   March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Namond Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armen-
trout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court, and deny Appellant's motion to supplement the record. United
States v. Williams, Nos. CR-90-135-K; CA-97-1256-JFM (D. Md. Oct.

30 & Nov. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2