Court Opinion

ID: 4349709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-12 17:39:03.731569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:39.357269
License: Public Domain

J-S56033-18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA               :   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                               :         PENNSYLVANIA
                                               :
                v.                             :
                                               :
                                               :
    ROBERT L. LONGO,                           :
                                               :
                       Appellant               :       No. 376 MDA 2018

            Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence February 8, 2018
                in the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County
             Criminal Division at No(s): CP-55-CR-0000404-2016

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., KUNSELMAN, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

MEMORANDUM BY MUSMANNO, J.:                         FILED DECEMBER 12, 2018

        Robert L. Longo (“Longo”) appeals from the judgment of sentence

imposed following his conviction of two counts of stalking and one count of

intimidation of a witness.1 We affirm.

        Previously, Longo had pled guilty to simple assault and terroristic

threats, arising out of a January 2016 incident in which he physically assaulted

his then-wife, Alicia.2 In March 2016, while he was in prison, Longo sent two

letters to Alicia, conveying threats to her and her family from other inmates,

detailing physical abuses he had suffered in prison, and stating that he did not

want a divorce. Longo also asked Alicia to tell the District Attorney that she
____________________________________________

1   18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 2709.1(a)(1)-(2), 4952(a)(2).

2 Longo and Alicia were married on October 2, 2015. Alicia testified at trial
that she and Longo were married for approximately one year, but that they
had been separated for most of that time. See N.T., 11/28/17, at 107. Their
divorce was final at the time of trial. See id. at 101.
J-S56033-18

lied (presumably about the assault), and stated that he would let “them” kill

him if she did not recant.

       In September 2016, after Longo was released from prison, and while he

was under supervision, Alicia began receiving emails from “Anthony Falcone”

with an email address of TJFalconeMafia1@gmail.com.3,          4   In the emails,

“Anthony Falcone” threatened to kill Longo if Alicia did not respond, or if she

told the police about the threats, and indicated on several occasions that Alicia

was being watched. The emails progressed to include threats to Alicia. In

one email to Alicia, “Anthony Falcone” stated, “You want out of the family it’s

going to have to be your life.”

       After receiving information that Longo had violated a condition of

supervision prohibiting threatening communications, Northumberland County

____________________________________________

3 Alicia’s mother, Kathleen Durkin (“Durkin”), also received emails from the
TJFalconeMafia1@gmail.com account.

4 At trial, Alicia testified that Longo had previously led her to believe that his
family was involved in the mafia, and that there had been incidents in which
Longo threatened her by telling her that his cousin Anthony would kill her
family. See N.T., 11/28/17, at 99-100; see also id. at 52-53, 56 (wherein
Durkin confirmed that Longo had previously mentioned his cousin Anthony to
threaten Alicia). Alicia also testified that she had asked Longo’s father
whether there was anyone in his family named Anthony, and his father replied
that there was not. See id. at 130-31.

                                           -2-
J-S56033-18

Probation5 made contact with Longo and conducted a search, during which

two cell phones were recovered.

       The cell phones were eventually turned over to the Selinsgrove Police

Department, and the police applied for and obtained a search warrant to

examine the contents of the phones. During the search, the police discovered

that the TJFalconeMafia1@gmail.com account was set up on one of the cell

phones.     The police saw the messages that had been sent to Alicia, and

confirmed that the emails that Alicia and Durkin had received were sent from

the account open on the cell phone.

       Following a jury trial, Longo was convicted of two counts of stalking and

one count of intimidation of a witness. On February 8, 2018, the trial court

sentenced Longo to concurrent prison terms of 14 months to 5 years for the

stalking charges, and a consecutive prison term of 16 months to 7 years for

the intimidation of a witness charge.          The trial court also ordered Longo’s

sentence to be served consecutively to his Northumberland County sentence.

       Longo filed a timely Notice of Appeal and a court-ordered Pa.R.A.P.

1925(b) Concise Statement of matters complained of on appeal.

       On appeal, Longo raises the following issue for our review:

       Whether the trial court erred in admitting emails and transcripts
       of emails over the objection of defense counsel where the emails
       were not authenticated, the author of the emails could not be
____________________________________________

5 Longo had originally been placed under the supervision of Snyder County
Probation. However, as Longo was residing in Northumberland County, his
supervision was transferred to Northumberland County Probation. See N.T.,
11/28/17, at 76-77.

                                           -3-
J-S56033-18

       ascertained and [which] were ultimately offered for the truth of
       the matter asserted?

Brief for Appellant at 4.

       Longo argues that the proffered email evidence was hearsay, and was

not properly authenticated. Id. at 9. Longo claims that he did not stipulate

to either his ownership of the cell phones retrieved during the search, or the

chain of custody of the cell phones. Id. at 10. Longo also points out that the

probation officer who had conducted the search did not testify at trial. Id.

Additionally, Longo claims that another individual had access to his Facebook

account.6 Id. at 11.

       In both his Statement of Questions Involved and his Argument, Longo

conflates the issues of authentication and hearsay. Longo additionally fails to

cite to or discuss any Rules of Evidence pertaining to either the authentication

of evidence or the rule against hearsay. See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a) (stating that

the argument shall include “such discussion and citation of authorities as are

deemed pertinent.”).        Further, although Longo’s Argument includes some

references to trial testimony, albeit without citations to the notes of testimony,

see Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c), he fails to explain why such testimony is relevant to

____________________________________________

6 It is unclear from the record whether Alicia or Durkin received any messages
through the “Anthony Falcone” Facebook profile. However, Durkin testified
that she located the Anthony Falcone Facebook profile, which had been set up
the      night    before   Alicia  began      receiving    emails   from   the
TJFalconeMafia1@gmail.com account. See N.T., 11/28/17, at 71-72. Durkin
also noted that Anthony Falcone’s Facebook “friends” were the “usual group
of friends that [Longo] has.” Id. at 71. Further, Alicia testified that Longo
maintained Facebook accounts for at least two other “alter egos.” See id. at
101, 104-05.

                                           -4-
J-S56033-18

either claim. Because Longo’s claims concerning authentication and hearsay

are not adequately developed so as to permit appellate review, they are

waived. See Commonwealth v. Phillips, 141 A.3d 512, 522 (Pa. Super.

2016) (stating that “arguments which are not appropriately developed are

waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa.

2009) (stating that “where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of

a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any

other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”).

      Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary

Date: 12/12/2018

                                     -5-