Court Opinion

ID: 5284046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 01:47:11.293199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:30.459373
License: Public Domain

*464
ORDER

PER CURIAM.
■ John Thomas appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise noted.