Court Opinion

ID: 9388487
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-20 18:00:35.231656+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:20.754000
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10868         Document: 00516718980             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/20/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10868
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                  April 20, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jim Wesley Davis,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 3:08-CR-36-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jim Wesley Davis has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Davis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
   portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Davis’s response. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10868    Document: 00516718980         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/20/2023

                                 No. 22-10868

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2