Court Opinion

ID: 4585170
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-10 16:01:41.005593+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:36.880714
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-1513    Document: 45    Page: 1   Filed: 11/10/2020

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

  DAK AMERICAS LLC, AURIGA POLYMERS INC.,
             Plaintiffs-Appellants

                            v.

                    UNITED STATES,
                    Defendant-Appellee
                  ______________________

                        2020-1513
                  ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Court of International
 Trade in No. 1:17-cv-00195-TCS, Chief Judge Timothy C.
 Stanceu.
                 ______________________

                Decided: November 10, 2020
                  ______________________

     PAUL C. ROSENTHAL, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP,
 Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also
 represented by CAMERON R. ARGETSINGER, JOSHUA MOREY,
 DAVID C. SMITH, JR.

     MIKKI COTTET, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United
 States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for
 defendant-appellee.   Also represented by JEFFREY B.
 CLARK, JEANNE DAVIDSON, FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR.;
 SUZANNA HARTZELL-BALLARD, Office of Assistant Chief
Case: 20-1513    Document: 45     Page: 2    Filed: 11/10/2020

2                         DAK AMERICAS LLC   v. UNITED STATES

 Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, In-
 dianapolis, IN.
                 ______________________

     Before DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
 PER CURIAM.
     Without reaching the question whether the demand
 letters at issue here constitute final agency action, the
 Court finds that appellants have failed to show that, on the
 merits, the decision by the Court of International Trade
 was erroneous.
                        AFFIRMED