Court Opinion

ID: 9929733
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-03 21:00:48.484606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:45:51.684903
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2008      Doc: 9         Filed: 02/02/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-2008

        ROSIE HOPKINS,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; PATHWAYS FOR PEOPLE, INC.; JAMIE
        WEST, Owner, Pathways for People, Inc.; MICHELLE SULLIVAN, Owner,
        Pathways for People, Inc.; GLORIA ROTHROCK, Owner, Pathways for People,
        Inc.; NC INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; TAMARA NANCE, Chief Deputy, NC
        Industrial Commission; OFFICER SEAN MYERS, Apex Police Department; PAUL
        MITCHEL MCKINNON MCKINNEY; JUDGE RICHARD MYERS, II;
        VILLAGES OF APEX CLUB HOA; DEBRA GABRIELLE, Villages of Apex Club
        House HOA; ANTHONY SACCO, Villages of Apex Club House HOA,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:21-cv-00087-FL)

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                       Decided: February 2, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Rosie Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2008      Doc: 9        Filed: 02/02/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Rosie Hopkins appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her amended civil

        action for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hopkins v. North Carolina, No. 4:21-cv-

        00087-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2