Court Opinion

ID: 3675315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:22:18.855424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:14.957027
License: Public Domain

The appeal bond sent up with the record to this court is justified as follows: "Personally appeared beme R. C. Broadhurst who, being duly sworn, says he is worth the amount of the above bond over and above his homestead and personal property exemption and personal liabilities."
In this court there was a motion by the appellee to dismiss *Page 93 
the appeal, because the appeal bond was not justified according to law, in that, neither the surety nor principal thereto stated upon oath that he was worth double the amount of the said bond over and above his exemptions and liabilities, c.
The statute is peremptory, that an undertaking upon appeal shall be of no affect unless it be accompanied by the affidavit of one of the sureties that he is worth double the amount specified therein. THE CODE, § 560. The objection is well taken. Lytle v. Lytle, 90 N.C. 647; Bryson v. Lucas85 N.C. 397.
   The motion of the appellee must be allowed and the appeal dismissed. Appeal dismissed.