Court Opinion

ID: 4173150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-05-31 19:04:12.250601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:13.503499
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not. binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  James Dana Sweets appeals the district court’s letter order rejecting as meritless his objection to subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Sweets,
  
  No. 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4 (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED