Court Opinion

ID: 4692778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-04 00:00:29.764941+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:06.752481
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10881      Document: 00515886473         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/03/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                  United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                           FILED
                                                                      June 3, 2021
                                  No. 20-10881                      Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Isaac Isiah Portillo,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:19-CR-138-1

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaac Isiah
   Portillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Portillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10881     Document: 00515886473          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/03/2021

                                   No. 20-10881

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2