Court Opinion

ID: 152131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-03 00:05:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:24:27.389817
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            AUG 02 2010

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS EUGENE CUNNINGHAM,                         No. 08-35913

               Plaintiff - Appellant,            D.C. No. 1:05-cv-00515-FVS

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
SGT. FLETCHER, Sgt. Mail Room
Operations; et al.,

               Defendants - Appellees.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                              for the District of Idaho
                    Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted July 19, 2010 **

Before:        B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

       Louis Eugene Cunningham, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

effect service of process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review for an abuse of discretion. Rio Props., Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d

1007, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002). We reverse and remand.

      Cunningham substantially complied with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure by serving the summons and the original complaint on a Deputy

Attorney General, and attempting to serve the operative complaint on Michael J.

Elia, who was appointed Special Deputy Attorney General for the purpose of

representing defendants in this case. See Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v.

Brenneke, 551 F.3d 1132, 1135 (9th Cir. 2009) (so long as there is substantial

compliance with Rule 4 and the defendant receives sufficient notice of the

complaint, Rule 4 is to be liberally construed to uphold service); Idaho Admin.

Code r.06.01.01.106 (2010) (requiring service of summons, complaints, and

subpoenas against or upon the Idaho Department of Corrections and its employees

to be made upon the deputy attorneys general assigned to the Department in the

manner and form required by state and federal rules of procedure). Accordingly,

we reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

      REVERSED and REMANDED.

                                          2                                     08-35913