Court Opinion

ID: 6497413
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-01 20:08:07.786675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:27.491039
License: Public Domain

People v Torrance (2022 NY Slip Op 04266)

People v Torrance

2022 NY Slip Op 04266

Decided on July 1, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 1, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

578 KA 21-01008

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJAMES TORRANCE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Matthew J. Doran, J.), rendered July 6, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Hoffman, 191 AD3d 1262, 1263 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 36 NY3d 1097 [2021]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: July 1, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court