Court Opinion

ID: 9301303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:07:40.769653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:41.724826
License: Public Domain

CADWALADER, District Judge,
considered that the plaintiffs were not in a condition to make such a book as shown in the application. It was something new to him that copyright was applicable to an inchoate and intended publication. Assuming that a manuscript could be copyrighted, the question was whether it must not be in the form in which it is to be printed. The difficulty was that the plaintiffs had no copyright in the subject but only in the work. If there is anything but literary piracy, their remedy is in the state courts. There is no remedy in the United States court until it comes to infringement of literary property. The plaintiffs go upon the .ground of literary property, not in print and only partly in manuscript. The jurisdiction of the court is only over printed matter. The mere threat to print a book does not give it jurisdiction. The act says a book, not an intended book. The injunction was therefore refused.