Court Opinion

ID: 1023951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:26:05.046448+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:44.609270
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Calvin Lee Everette appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Rule 60(b)(3).” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Everette,
  
  No. 5:01-cr-00068-BO (E.D.N.C. June 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.