Court Opinion

ID: 2014776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:03:15.580759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:54:21.692341
License: Public Domain

587 N.W.2d 844 (1999)
Mary A. OBERT, Respondent,
v.
Bradley DAHL, petitioner, Appellant.
No. C3-97-1023.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 28, 1999.
Jeffrey P. Hicken, Jensen, Hicken & Scott, P.A., Anoka, for appellant.
*845 Larry Neilson, Rooney & Neilson, Ltd., Arden Hills, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
The legal issue presented in this case is identical to the legal issue presented in In re Estate of Palmen, ___ N.W.2d ___, ___ (Minn. Jan. 28, 1998). Based on our reasoning in Palmen the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.