Court Opinion

ID: 9417187
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 20:05:15.76131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:37.008978
License: Public Domain

Mr. Chief Justice Waite
dissenting.
I dissent from the judgment in this case. In my opinion *482the grant of the right of way to the Denver and Rio Grande Company, contained in the act of June 8, 1872, is no more than a license to enter upon and use such of the public lands of the United States as should be unoccupied and not appropriated to other purposes when the permanent location of its road with a view to actual construction should be made. Words which, in a grant of land to aid in building a railroad, imply a present grant need not necessarily have that effect in a grant of right of way only.
I think, also, the Canon City and San Juan Company made the first permanent location with a view to actual construction through the pass in controversy. Consequently it secured the preference of routes, subject to a reasonable use of the route it occupied, if necessary, by the Denver Company in common with itself.