Court Opinion

ID: 2935207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 03:57:26.562548+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:49.034180
License: Public Domain

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 2009

Dismissed
and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 2009.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-09-00413-CV
____________
 
FEDERICO MENDOZA, Appellant
 
V.
 
EDGAR E. MARTINEZ, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the County Civil
Court at Law No. 3
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
858752
 

 
M E M O R
A N D U M   O P I N I O N
This
appeal is from a judgment signed February 5, 2009.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  The clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court
appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.  

On June
12, 2009, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made
arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of
payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellant has not provided this
court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this
court=s notice.
In
addition,  our records show that appellant has neither established indigence
nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases
unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing
requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees
Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and
Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon
2005) (same). 
On May
19, 2009, the court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and the
appeal was subject to dismissal unless the fee were paid within ten days.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing
involuntary dismissal of case because
appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or
other action within specified time).  Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly,
the appeal is ordered dismissed.
 
PER
CURIAM
 
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Guzman and Boyce.