Court Opinion

ID: 8635787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:45:00.547702+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:55.312077
License: Public Domain

BENEDICT, District Judge.
Upon the facts in this case which are not disputed, there can be no doubt of the libellants’ right to recover their freight of the defendants. It is clear law that whoever receives cargo from a ship under a bill of lading, in the absence of circumstances showing a different understanding, is liable to the ship for the freight. It is not absolutely necessary that a bill of lading should be actually indorsed, or even delivered to the buyer, to make him the as-signee thereof. Other circumstances may be shown equally sufficient to show the real relationship of a party to the cargo. Here the defendants received the coal themselves from the vessel’s side; they gave no notice to the master or any one that they did not receive it under the bill of lading. After its delivery, they gave to the master, upon the back of his copy of the bill of lading, a receipt stating that they had received the coal from the libel-lants. Under such circumstances, they cannot be permitted to say that they dealt only with Blanchard, and are strangers to the contract for the freight. As between them and the vessel, they became, under the circumstances, the assignees of the bill of lading. They dealt with the ship in that capacity and no other, and the receipt of the coal made them liable, as such, for the freight. Besides it is clear that the defendants understood themselves to be liable to the ship for the freight, for one of them testifies that he at first declined to buy the coal of Blanchard because coal was dull, and he knew he would have to pay the freight, which objection Blanchard obviated by agreeing to take their note for the freight, and seeing they were not compelled to pay it This was accepted, and after the coal was delivered and their liability for the freight fixed, they gave to Blanchard their note for the amount of the freight, with interest added, of all which the libellants knew nothing. This indicates clearly that the defendants understood their liability to the ship and relied upon Blanchard to save them from it. Their misfortune is to have relied upon a man whose death and insolvency made it impossible for him to protect them. There must be a decree in favor of the libellants for $2S7.92 with interest and costs.