Court Opinion

ID: 674749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:55:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:15.618303
License: Public Domain

30 F.3d 129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Charline RADCLIFFE, Lieutenant, Correction Officer IV;Marsh, Acting Warden, Roxbury CorrectionalInstitute;  Ronald Hutchinson, ActingWarden, Maryland House ofCorrections,DefendantsAppellees.
No. 94-6346.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 23, 1994.Decided July 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-93-2556-JFM)
Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Johnson v. Radcliffe, No. CA-93-2556-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 28, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED