Court Opinion

ID: 9546008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:23:30.716607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:15:53.460036
License: Public Domain

SPENCE, J.
I concur in the reversal of the judgments upon the grounds stated but cannot subscribe to all that is said in the majority opinion. In my opinion, the judgments should be reversed upon the further grounds: (1) that the evidence, as a matter of law, was insufficient to establish ac*453tionable fraud and (2) that plaintiff’s alleged cause of action, as a matter of law, was barred by the statute of limitations. I am of the view that the facts and the law relating to these further grounds for reversal were exhaustively and correctly discussed in the dissenting opinion written by Mr. Justice Knight at the time this cause was pending in the District Court of Appeal, to which dissenting opinion reference is hereby made. (Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co., (Cal.App.) 148 P.2d 41, 59.)
Edmonds, J., concurred.