Court Opinion

ID: 9930065
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-06 01:00:44.944248+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:51:58.625668
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50920       Document: 00517056189             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/05/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                    ____________
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                     No. 22-50920
                                   Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                   ____________                               February 5, 2024
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                        Clerk

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                           versus

   Daryn Lee Pryor,

                                             Defendant—Appellant.
                    ______________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:22-CR-124-1
                    ______________________________

   Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Daryn Lee Pryor has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Pryor has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the

          _____________________
          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
   should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
   forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-50920      Document: 00517056189          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/05/2024

                                    No. 22-50920

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Pryor’s response.
   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                         2