Court Opinion

ID: 9669305
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 02:48:41.235144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:55.274781
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
In our original opinion we called attention to the omission of page 20 in the transcript. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is accompanied with a request that the original transcript be completed by adding the omitted page 20 thereto. There is included in the motion a copy of omitted page 20 which copy appellee agrees is correct.
We, therefore, grant appellant’s requesv and incorporate, by reference, omitted page 20 of the transcript as set out on page 2 of appellant’s motion.
As the same is now shown, appellant’s-requested issue 14 is conditioned on a “Yes” answer to requested issue 13, and is: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence, that the failure of the s-aid Clarence Orr to yield the right of way, at the time and on the occasion in question, was the sole proximate cause of the collision in question? Answer Yes or No.”
■ For the reasons stated in our original opinion, we think no error is reflected.
'.The motion to complete the transcript is granted,- and the motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.