Court Opinion

ID: 691536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:12:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:07.361988
License: Public Domain

50 F.3d 6
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Gordon GASKINS, Petitioner--Appellant,v.William L. SMITH, Warden;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents--Appellees.
No. 94-7389.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1995Decided Feb. 22, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CA-94-1626)
Gordon Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se.  John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Gaskins v. Smith, No. CA-94-1626 (D. Md. Oct. 25, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED