Court Opinion

ID: 9454726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 18:56:34.72947+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:34:16.021052
License: Public Domain

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
With all respect, I am unable to agree that Miranda,1 Mathis,2 and Orozco3 support the decision herein. Mr. Lackey was surely not in custody at the interview. In my view the findings of the district court do not support the conclusion that he had been “deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”

. Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

. Mathis v. United States (1968), 391 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1503, 20 L.Ed.2d 381.

. Orozco v. Texas, (1969), 394 U.S. 324, 89 S.Ct. 1095, 22 L.Ed.2d 311.