Court Opinion

ID: 5468669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:13:46.556969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:12.987381
License: Public Domain

Clerke, Justice.
The plaintiff had a right to sue the defendant in an action ex contractu, or ex delicto. He has elected the former, as I infer from an examination of the summons, (properly before me as a paper in the action,) taken in-connection with the complaint. If he sued in an action ex delicto, he would have a right to state the issuable facts, showing the fraud, or other wrong; and, if he recovered judgment, he would have a right to issue execution against the person of the defendant, without any application to the court. But, as I deem the action commenced equivalent to the old action for money had and received, and therefore ex contractu, all statements relative to the fraud, even if the issuable facts relating to it were succinctly, set forth, are manifestly irrelevant and redundant.
Motion granted, with liberty to the plaintiff to amend—$10 costs to defendant to abide event.