Court Opinion

ID: 8437945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:27:47.438796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.655296
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stoney William Ault appeals district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ault v. Waid, No. 2:07-cv-00088-REM-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 16, 2009). We also deny Ault’s motion to seal the record on appeal. Local Rule 25(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.