Court Opinion

ID: 9397287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-24 21:01:18.87578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:23.110124
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1077      Doc: 11         Filed: 05/23/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1077

        KENNITH HARVEY,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00169-DJN)

        Submitted: May 18, 2023                                           Decided: May 23, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kennith Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney,
        OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1077         Doc: 11      Filed: 05/23/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Kennith Harvey appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his

        civil complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-

        80, for failure to state a claim and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

        stated by the district court. Harvey v. United States, No. 3:22-cv-00169-DJN (E.D. Va.

        Dec. 2, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     2