Court Opinion

ID: 4560446
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-26 21:02:11.939276+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:15:57.393122
License: Public Domain

FILED
Jun 27, 2019
03:22 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS

 

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

William Lowder, ) Docket No.: 2019-01-0122
Employee, )

V. )

XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., ) State File No.: 11383-2019
Employer, )

And )

Indemnity Ins. Co. of N.A., ) Judge Audrey Headrick
Carrier. )

 

ORDER ASSESSING PENALTY

 

This came before the Court on its June 12, 2019, written request for XPO
Logistics to provide documentation as to why a civil penalty should not be assessed for
its alleged late payment of past temporary disability benefits to Mr. Lowder.' XPO
Logistics filed its response on May 23 and a supplemental response on June 20. For the
reasons below, the Court assesses a penalty against XPO Logistics under Tennessee Code
Annotated section 50-6-205(b)(3)(A) (2018).

History of Claim

Mr. Lowder, a driver for XPO Logistics, developed hernias on January 2, 2019,
when he delivered a shipment of solar panels to a customer. He received authorized
treatment and work restrictions. On February 13, Dr. Darren Hunt saw Mr. Lowder and
noted complaints of groin pain on both sides, a palpable hernia on the left, tenderness on
the right, and CT results revealing a left inguinal hernia and umbilical hernia. Dr. Hunt

 

' Mr. Lowder filed a May 14 Request for Expedited Hearing on the record. The Court issued a docketing
notice allowing the parties until June 21 to file objections or submit position statements. It also contained
a written request for XPO Logistics to provide documentation as to why a civil penalty should not be
assessed for its alleged late payment of temporary disability benefits to Mr. Lowder. See T.C.A. § 50-6-
205 (3) (B). XPO Logistics did not request an evidentiary hearing, and the Court determined it needed no
additional evidence to decide the issues. Since a Request for Expedited Hearing applies to requests for
medical and/or temporary disability benefits, the Court will treat the Request as a motion for penalties.
recommended surgery to repair the left-sided hernias and to explore the right-side given
Mr. Lowder’s complaints of pain. XPO Logistics denied the claim on February 19
asserting the hernia did not appear “immediately” following the January 2 accident as
required by the hernia statute. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-212.

As part of an ongoing mediation process, XPO Logistics accepted Mr. Lowder’s
claim. XPO Logistics did not accommodate Mr. Lowder’s restrictions on January 24 and
January 25 but did accommodate them from January 26 through April 26 at less than his
average weekly wage. On or about April 24, XPO Logistics issued a $4,394.82
temporary partial disability benefits check to Mr. Lowder for benefits that accrued from
January 24 through April 26.

Law and Analysis
Non-Payment or Late Payment of Temporary Disability Benefits

Mr. Lowder requested that the Court assess a twenty-five percent penalty for the
late payment of temporary disability benefits. The type of disability benefit paid to Mr.
Lowder was temporary partial disability benefits because he earned less than his average
weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A).
Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-205(b)(3) authorizes a workers’ compensation
judge to assess a twenty-five-percent penalty when “an employer, trust or pool or an
employer’s insurer fails to pay, or untimely pays, temporary disability benefits within
twenty (20) days after the employer has knowledge of any disability that would qualify
Jor benefits under this chapter.” (Emphasis added.)

Here, XPO Logistics disputes that the twenty-five percent penalty applies to
temporary partial disability benefits. It relies on an unreported opinion of the Special
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel, which states that the statute “imposes a penalty
of 25 percent on unpaid temporary total benefits only.” Building Materials Corp., et al.
v. Coleman, No. M2004-01829-WC-R3-CV, 2005 WL 3147658 (Tenn. Special Workers’
Comp. App. Panel Nov. 28, 2005). Respectfully, this Court disagrees with the Panel
because the clear statutory language reflects that it applies to “temporary disability
benefits” and does not limit that applicability to temporary total disability benefits only.

Likewise, the Court disagrees with XPO Logistics’s assertion that the language in
Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-118(a)(13) controls. Tennessee Code Annotated
section 50-6-118(a)(13) is a separate statute that authorizes the Bureau of Workers’
Compensation to issue penalties for an employer’s “[w]rongful failure” to pay temporary
total disability benefits. However, that statute does not trump the authority the
Legislature provided in 50-6-205(b)(3) for the Court to assess a penalty “as to all
temporary disability benefits that are determined not to be paid in compliance with this
subsection (b).” (Emphasis added.)
In 2004, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-205(b)(3) changed significantly.
Before 2004, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-205 stated: “[a]ny employer or his
insurance carrier who fails to pay compensation as herein provided shall suffer a penalty
of six percent (6%) on any unpaid installments.” (Emphasis added.) The Tennessee
Supreme Court interpreted “shall suffer a penalty” to mean that “the failure to pay must
be in bad faith on the part of the defendant.” Mayes v. Genesco, Inc., 510 S.W.2d 882,
885 (Tenn. 1974). However, in 2004, the Reform changed the statute to its current
language granting authority to assess a 25% penalty to “workers’ compensation
specialists” now “workers’ compensation judges.” Importantly, the 2004 Reform deleted
the “shall suffer a penalty” language relied upon by the Tennessee Supreme Court in
1974.

After the 2004 Reform, the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel
continued to use the Supreme Court’s prior reasoning regarding “bad faith” in its analysis
of the twenty-five percent penalty. See, Kyle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., No. W2013-
01505-WC-R3-WC, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 702, at *22-23 (Tenn. Special Workers’ Comp.
Panel Oct. 2, 2014); Overton v. Regis Corp., No. M2007-00069-WC-R3-WC, 2008 Tenn.
LEXIS 799, at *17-18 (Tenn. Special Workers’ Comp. Panel Nov. 4, 2008).
Respectfully, this Court disagrees with the Panel’s continued reliance upon the Supreme
Court’s 1974 “bad faith” analysis. The 1974 statutory language that prompted the
Tennessee Supreme Court’s imposition of a bad faith requirement no longer exists.”
Therefore, the Court holds that the “bad faith” analysis is no longer required in
determining whether to assess a twenty-five percent penalty.

After carefully considering the entire record, including XPO Logistics’s response,
the Court determines that XPO Logistics was not in compliance with Section 50-6-
205(b)(3)(A). As previously noted, the Court is not swayed by XPO Logistics’s assertion
that the twenty-five percent penalty does not apply to temporary partial disability
benefits.

Likewise, even if “bad faith” remains the standard, the Court notes that XPO
Logistics denied Mr. Lowder’s claim in February based on the “immediacy” element of
the hernia statute. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-212. XPO Logistics offered no factual
evidence, medical or otherwise, to this Court that substantiated the denial on this ground.
And the record does not reflect that any new information developed between February

 

* The Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board allows reliance on precedent from the Tennessee
Supreme Court “unless it is evident that the Supreme Court’s decision or rationale relied on a remedial
interpretation of pre-July 1, 2014 statutes, that it relied on specific statutory language no longer contained
in the Workers’ Compensation Law, and/or that it relied on an analysis that has since been addressed by
the general assembly through statutory amendments.” McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015
TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).
and April that would eliminate its defense of the immediacy requirement when XPO
Logistics decided to accept the claim and paid $4,394.82 in past temporary partial
disability benefits. Specifically, the Court finds that XPO failed to pay temporary
disability benefits within twenty days after having knowledge of Mr. Lowder’s disability.

Therefore, the Court assesses a $1,098.71 penalty against XPO Logistics.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

l.

XPO Logistics shall pay Mr. Lowder a twenty-five percent penalty in the amount
of $1,098.71 for the period of January 24, 2019, through April 26, 2019.

This case is set for a Status Hearing on Thursday, August 29, 2019, at 1:30
p-m. Eastern Time. The parties must call (423) 634-0164 or toll-free at (855)
383-0001 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues
without your participation.

. Absent an appeal within seven business days of issuance, this order shall become

final. XPO Logistics must comply within fifteen calendar days of the order
becoming final or be subject to penalties set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated
section 50-6-238(d). The Insurer or Employer must submit confirmation of
compliance with this Order to the Bureau. by’ email to
WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the fifteenth business day after this
Order becomes final. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the
period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance.

For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation
Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program(@tn.gov.

 

ENTERED June 27, 2019.

AUDREY 4. HEADRICK
Workers’ Compensation Judge
APPENDIX

Exhibits:

Panel

February 19, 2019 letter from Sedgwick

Paystubs (December 18, 2018, to April 27, 2019)

Medical records of Physicians Care (For Identification Only)’
Medical records of CHI Memorial (For Identification Only)
Medical records of Dr. Darren Hunt

Affidavit of William Kyle Lowder

Affidavit of Christopher Mabe

SCAAWEWN >

Technical record:
1. Petition for Benefit Determination
2. Dispute Certification Notice
3. Request for Expedited Hearing
4. Employer’s Response in Opposition to Employee’s Request for Expedited
Hearing
Docketing Notice
6. Employer’s Supplemental Response in Opposition to Employee’s Request for
Expedited Hearing
7. Notice of Filing

WG

 

The Court did not admit into evidence medical records from Physicians Care or CHI Memorial based on
XPO Logistics’s objection, since there was neither a medical certification nor a physician’s signature.
I certify that a copy of this Order Assessing Penalty was sent to these recipients as
indicated below on June 27, 2019.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name Certified Via Service sent to:
Mail Email
William Lowder, x x klowder676(@gmail.com
Employee 611 Mountain Wood Drive
Hixson, TN 37343
Frederick W. Hodge, x fhodge@howell-fisher.com
Employer’s Attorney
Compliance Program x WCCompliance.program(@tn.gov

 

 

 

 

 

 

Av Wy Sui
PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
we.courtclerk(@tn.gov

 

bu
KT

Wi OUPriasny )