Court Opinion

ID: 9387956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-19 15:03:39.780232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:16.407316
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                        NATOYA CUNNINGHAM,
                             Appellant,

                                      v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                               No. 4D22-1631

                               [April 19, 2023]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Martin County; Robert R. Makemson, Judge; L.T. Case No.
432019CF000487A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences without discussion.
See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022). However, we
remand for correction of scrivener’s errors in the scoresheet and judgment.
The scoresheet lists section 784.045(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes, as the
primary offense and the judgment states that appellant was convicted
under section 784.045(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes. Both appellant and the
state agree that the scoresheet and judgment should cite section
784.045(1)(a) without referencing any specific subparagraph because the
jury did not make a finding as to whether the aggravated battery was based
on great bodily harm or the use of a deadly weapon. Accordingly, on
remand, the trial court shall make these corrections.

   Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

                           *          *           *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                               2