Court Opinion

ID: 6148199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:31:52.3507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:56.776977
License: Public Domain

Newburger, J.
The plaintiffs hired a plot of ground at Sedgwick avenue and the old Boston road in the city of New T ork, on which a frame house stood, belonging to defendant, and occupied the same. During plaintiffs’ absence in the month of September, 1892, plaintiffs’ house was broken into by a number of men and filled with cement, and the property of plaintiffs injured and destroyed. It is claimed that the cement was the property of defendant, and was brought to the house by the agents of defendant to be used in improvements on the farm on which the house stood.
This action is brought to recover damages for such acts on the part of defendant and his agents.
A careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any errors. The trial justice properly submitted the case to the jury, and there are no exceptions that would warrant as in disturbing the judgment herein.
The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs'.
Van Wyok, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.