Court Opinion

ID: 5376869
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 08:40:28.461392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:04.241660
License: Public Domain

Memorandum: The State Civil Service Commission, at the request of appellant, certified the names of three guards for promotion to the position of sergeant in their graded order, namely: (1) Wilkins, (2) Burns (petitioner-respondent) and (3) Johnson. All had passed competitive civil service examinations for the position and had *1054claimed and received a preference as disabled war veterans (Civil Service Law, § 21; Rules for Classified Civil Service, rule XI, subd. 1). We think that subdivision 2 of rule VIII, applied, and gave to appellant the right to select any one of these three disabled veterans and that the appointment of Johnson was valid. All concur. (The order directs defendant to appoint petitioner to the rank of sergeant in the Department of Correction.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.