Court Opinion

ID: 5608846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:52:33.482109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:02.295642
License: Public Domain

Hodges, J.
1. Middleton sued the Seaboard Air-Line Railway and obtained a verdict, which was set aside by this court, and he thereupon dismissed his suit. Lott, who was president of the Lott-Lewis Company, a corporation, brought a suit on the same cause of action, and subsequently dismissed it. Lott-Lewis Company then brought the present suit against the Seaboard Air-Line Railway, based upon the same cause of action. Lott was the president of the Lott-Lewis Company, and the defendant pleaded that the former suits concluded and bound the Lott-Lewis Company. “A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the same parties and their privies as to all matters put in issue, or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered.” Civil Code, § 4336. The fact that Lott was the president of the corporation will not conclude the corporation from asserting its rights, and the corporation is not bound by the two suits based upon the cause of action involved in this case, the corporation not being a party to- either of the other suits.
2. The evidence justified the jury in finding the title of the mule killed to be in the plaintiff, and the verdict is sustained by the evidence. . Judgment affirmed.