Court Opinion

ID: 4023276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-10 19:00:55.768445+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:55.077400
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Dawn V. Martin and Miguel Gallardo appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. Rule 60(b) motion challenging the taxation of costs and denying their request to submit color photographs by electronic means. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Brondum, No. 1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

  AFFIRMED