Court Opinion

ID: 3213711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-15 23:02:41.670123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:51.593435
License: Public Domain

Filed 6/15/16 In re Nguyen CA4/3

                      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                     FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                DIVISION THREE

In re LOI PHAT NGUYEN                                                  G053501

     on Habeas Corpus.                                                 (Super. Ct. No. 12WF2601)

                                                                       OPINION

                   Original proceedings; petition for a writ of habeas corpus to file a timely
notice of appeal. Petition granted.
                   Howard C. Cohen for Petitioner.
                   Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, and Julie L. Garland, Assistant
Attorney General for Respondent.

                                          *                  *                  *
THE COURT:*
                Petitioner, Loi Phat Nguyen, seeks relief from the failure to file a timely
notice of appeal from his criminal conviction. We agree Nguyen is entitled to relief and
the petition is granted.
                Following a jury trial, Loi Phat Nguyen was convicted of a number of
criminal offenses and sentenced to a total term of 70 years to life. In his declaration, trial
counsel states that after the sentencing hearing, Nguyen advised him that he wanted to
appeal his conviction. According to trial counsel, he advised Nguyen that he would file a
notice of appeal on his behalf, but inadvertently filed the notice of appeal late. (Cal.
Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).) When counsel attempted to file the notice of appeal, the
superior court stamped the notice of appeal “RECEIVED,” and transmitted a letter to
counsel that explained the last day to file a timely notice of appeal was December 18,
2015.
                The Attorney General does not oppose granting the petition without the
issuance of an order to show cause. (People v. Romero (1994) 8 Cal. 4th 728.)
                The principle of constructive filing of the notice of appeal is applied in
situations where trial counsel advises a criminal defendant that he will file a notice of
appeal on his client’s behalf, and then fails to do so in accordance with the law. (In re
Benoit (1973) 10 Cal. 3d 72, 87-88.) Because trial counsel has a duty to file a proper
notice of appeal on his client’s behalf, (Pen. Code § 1240.1, subd. (b)) Nguyen’s
reasonable reliance on counsel’s promise to file a timely notice of appeal entitles him to
the relief requested.
                The petition is granted. The Clerk of the Superior Court is directed to file
the notice of appeal that was received but not filed on March 2, 2016. Further
proceedings, including preparation of the record on appeal, are to be conducted according

*   Before O’Leary, P. J., Rylaarsdam, J., and Bedsworth, J.

                                               2
to the applicable rules of court. In the interest of justice, the opinion in this matter is
deemed final as to this court forthwith.

                                               3