Court Opinion

ID: 998780
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:16:04.687962+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:30.915942
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6397

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOYCE MAE STANCIL,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-92-113-BO, CA-97-325-5-BO)

Submitted:   May 25, 1999                   Decided:   May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce Mae Stancil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joyce Mae Stancil seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Stancil, Nos. CR-92-

113-BO; CA-97-325-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1999).   We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2