Court Opinion

ID: 2930915
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:02:05.02321+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:47.113221
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20,
2005.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-04-01049-CR
____________
 
GERVAIE L. DELANEY,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 185th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
986,695
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of
possession with intent to deliver cocaine. 
On October 26, 2004, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement
for  28 years in the Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further,
we find no reversible error in the record. 
A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the
state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed October 20, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson,
Frost, and Seymore. 
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).