Court Opinion

ID: 9647541
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:39:15.937023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:50.483834
License: Public Domain

GAMMAGE, Justice,
concurring.
I agree that sufficient grounds exist in the Public Utility Commission’s findings to sustain its final order; that the Public Utility Commission assessed the relevant criteria established in PURA in arriving at its determination; that the Commission acted reasonably within its discretion based upon its findings regarding these criteria; and that the record of the Commission proceeding contains substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Bell’s exclusionary policy and tariff rates did not discriminate unlawfully against AMTEL. This is all that is necessary to our review. Charter Medical-Dallas v. Texas Health Facilities Commission, 665 S.W.2d 446 (Tex.1984). I therefore concur only in the affirmance of the judgment.