Court Opinion

ID: 8681135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:11:53.91123+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.459326
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gwennetta Pratt-Miller and Curtis Dawkins seek to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee but allowing the claims against the remaining Defendant to go forward. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 'and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED