Court Opinion

ID: 9543650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:47:45.099099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:10:51.174598
License: Public Domain

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.
(concurring). I concur with the result reached in this case. However, as stated in a dissenting opinion in State v. Mendoza, 80 Wis.2d 122, 187, 258 N.W.2d 260 (1977), it is my opinion that the court should withdraw the stipulation rule enunciated in State v. Stanislawski, 62 Wis.2d 730, 216 N.W.2d 8 (1974), and hold that the results of a polygraph examination are not admissible evidence. Fulton v. State, 541 Pac.2d 871 (Okla. Crim. Ct. of App. 1975).