Court Opinion

ID: 3352269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:59:18.870356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:17.670425
License: Public Domain

This is an action to restrain the defendant from soliciting orders for sawdust and sweeping compound from customers of the plaintiff with whose names and needs he became acquainted by reason of his former employment by the plaintiff.
It is well settled that, even in the absence of a restrictive covenant, it is unfair competition and, therefore, unlawful for a former employee to use confidential information in the nature of trade secrets which he obtained during his employment in competition with his former employer, after his employment has ceased. Accordingly, if in any particular business the list of customers, because of some peculiarity of the business, is in reality a trade secret and an employee has gained knowledge thereof, as a matter of confidence, he will be restrained from using that knowledge against his employer. Nims, Unfair Competition (3rd ed. 1929) § 150; Anno. 23 A.L.R. 423.
In the complaint in this action, it is alleged that the knowledge as to the plaintiff's customers which the defendant obtained while in the plaintiff's employ and which the defendant is now using in competition with the plaintiff was confidential information and was a trade secret. Although on the trial it *Page 288 
may turn out as a matter of fact that this is not so, it certainly cannot be held on demurrer that, as a matter of law, such information in this particular set up was not such a trade secret.
   The demurrer is overruled.