Court Opinion

ID: 8449448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:33:19.334261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.126313
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM, 2008 WL 2468738 (W.D.N.C. filed June 16, 2008) & (entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.