Court Opinion

ID: 6254769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:27:00.815816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:31.040913
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
December 28, 1916, about 3:45 p. m., Lottie Brown was going along the east sidewalk of South Forty-seventh street, Philadelphia; when in front of No. 1429, she stepped into a pool of water three quarters of a yard long, one-half yard wide and six or seven inches deep ; she was thrown to the ground and sustained injuries. Both plaintiff and her husband sued the City of Philadelphia in trespass, alleging negligence and there are two appeals from the refusal of the court below to remove judgment’s of nonsuit.
Plaintiff testified she was looking ahead and saw the pool of water before stepping into it, but could not tell it covered a hole deep enough to cause a fall. When asked why she did not walk on the “other part of the pavement,” she replied, “I did not think of it.” At another point in her testimony she said, “There is constantly water there in different places”; but she did not say there were other pools of water or that there was not sufficient room on the sidewalk for her to have avoided the particular pool in question.
In entering the nonsuit, the trial judge very properly stated: “There were other parts of the pavement upon *185• which she could have walked in safety......; she [preferred] testing a danger,......and injury resulted. I
am of opinion her conduct was so negligent that she is not entitled to recover.”
The judgment is affirmed.