Court Opinion

ID: 14348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 06:34:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:53.745191
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 97-30291
                        (Summary Calendar)

MICHAEL D. LEWIS,

                                         Petitioner-Appellant,

                                versus

BURL CAIN, Warden,
Louisiana State Penitentiary,

                                         Respondent-Appellee.

                         - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Louisiana
                       (USDC No. 96-CV-699-S)
                         - - - - - - - - - -
                            March 16, 1998
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Michael Lewis, Louisiana state prisoner # 89966, has appealed

the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition

seeking relief relative to his second-degree murder conviction.

     The district court held that Lewis’s claims for relief are

procedurally barred, based on La. Rev. Stat. Ann. art. 930.8 (West

1997), a statute of limitations for applications for postconviction

relief.   A Louisiana appellate court has held, however, that the

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
statute is tolled during the time that a prisoner is mentally

incompetent, as Lewis asserts he has been and is.       See State v.

Gowan, 666 So. 2d 1325 (La. Ct. App.), vacated and set aside on

another ground, 670 So. 2d 1222 (La. 1996).

     Because   it   appears    that   Lewis   has   available   state

postconviction remedies which he should have been required to

exhaust, the district court’s judgment must be reversed and the

cause remanded for dismissal without prejudice.       See Picard v.

Connor, 404 U.S. 270 (1971).   In the event that Lewis exhausts his

state remedies and then reapplies for federal habeas relief, he

would not be procedurally barred because Gowan teaches that, in the

case of mental incompetence, the subject Louisiana statute is not

a strictly and regularly applied procedural bar.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

                                  2