Court Opinion

ID: 9396959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-24 00:00:18.809798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:20.549983
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11136         Document: 00516760522             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/23/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11136
                                     Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                     ____________                                     May 23, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ahmad Wright,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:19-CR-666-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Ahmad Wright has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Wright has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
   us to make a fair evaluation of Wright’s claims of ineffective assistance of

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-11136      Document: 00516760522           Page: 2    Date Filed: 05/23/2023

                                     No. 22-11136

   counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
   collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Wright’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                              2