Court Opinion

ID: 7529075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:07:55.071848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:40.995537
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla.1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.