Court Opinion

ID: 3195213
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-18 20:01:07.249834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:10.964573
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION
                                                                                APR 18 2016
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                              U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLARISSA URIAS INZUNZA, AKA                       No. 13-72341
Clariza Urias-Inzunza,
                                                  Agency No. A205-147-211
              Petitioner,

  v.                                              ORDER*

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

              Respondent.

                      On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted April 12, 2016**
                              San Francisco, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

       Urias Inzunza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

decision that she was not entitled to a favorable exercise of discretion in

        *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
        **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
connection with her application for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes judicial review of such a determination.

      PETITION DISMISSED.

                                        -2-