Court Opinion

ID: 9664179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:05:56.602014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:02.620340
License: Public Domain

*149BRYAN, Judge,
concurring in the rationale in part and concurring in the result.
I concur in the main opinion as to Part II, “The Partial Denial of Class Certification.” I believe that much of the analysis in Part I, “The Propriety of the Summary Judgment in Favor of the City,” is not necessary. An analysis of § 11-51-91, Ala.Code 1975, and State Department of Revenue v. Reynolds Metals Co., 541 So.2d 524 (Ala.1988), would provide sufficient grounds to reverse the trial court’s judgment as to this issue.