Court Opinion

ID: 4691798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-01 18:00:39.451186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:29.766312
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10634     Document: 00515881822         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/01/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         June 1, 2021
                                  No. 20-10634
                               Conference Calendar                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Miguel Antonio Gomez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:19-CR-325-1

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Antonio
   Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10634     Document: 00515881822           Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/01/2021

                                    No. 20-10634

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see
   5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot based on Gomez’s completion of his
   sentence, see Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

                                         2