Court Opinion

ID: 6739669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:20:58.161426+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:55.177127
License: Public Domain

RobiNSOn; J.
This is an action for a grave assault and battery. Defendant appeals from a judgment for $1,500, with interest and costs, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion is based on alleged errors in the charge of the court to the jury and on alleged misconduct of a juror. The charge is 'that pending the trial defendant and his witness slept in the same bed and in a room occupied by a juror, and that during the night the juror heard defendant talk in whispering tones to his witness concerning the testimony he should give. The juror makes affidavit that he was not influenced by the conversation and did not disclose it to any other juror until they had agreed on the verdict. The juror made affidavit thus:
“I heard Wyngarden talk to witness and tell him to testify that he did not see him kick Cohn, but that he had turned to mind his horses, or words to that effect. I decided the case on the evidence and never told any one of the occurrence till the verdict was signed.”
The motion for a new trial was not made on a statement of the case nor on the minutes of the court. There was no evidence submitted, only depositions taken by the plaintiff in regard to his injuries and the time lie was unable to work. There is the depositen of his doctor in Chicago showing that for two or three months the doctor treated him for a fractured rib. The doctor’s charge was $250; the hospital charge, $57. -For aught that appears from the record, it may have been clearly proven that defendant committed a brutal assault and battery on the plaintiff and that the damage was much greater than the verdict. The presumptions are all in favor of the judgment. The purpose of the law is> to administer justice between man and man and not to pile up a nice technical system of practice. By the code trivial defects of procedure must be disregarded. “The court shall, in every stage of the action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which do not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party; and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.” Code, § 7485. If the defendant had no' defense on the merits, then his rights were not affected by any of the *347matters alleged as error. If he had a defense, there was no way of proving it without producing the evidence. The presumption is that if produced the evidence would be adverse to him. Code, § 7936. Allowing full force and effect of the alleged errors, there is no showing that the judgment is not in all respects just and righteous beyond a question or a peradventure. If it be true, which it is not, that one of the jurors was prejudiced by accidentally overhearing defendant drilling his witness, it was no fault of the plaintiff; and defendant knew of the occurrence long before the close of the trial and he did not object to the juror. One who consents to an act is not wronged by it. Code, § 7249. Acquiesence in an error takes away the right of objectihg to it. Code, § 7250. No one can take advantage of his own wrong. Code, § 7251. No one should suffer by the act of another. Code, § 7254.
Judgment affirmed.
Grace, C. J., and Birdzell, J., concur.