Court Opinion

ID: 2898383
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 23:34:40.495871+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:55.025294
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-09-0164-CR

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                    AT AMARILLO

                                       PANEL D

                                DECEMBER 15, 2009
                         ______________________________

                            TIMOTHY MICHAEL KNOOP,

                                                              Appellant

                                           v.

                               THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                              Appellee

                       _________________________________

            FROM THE 31st DISTRICT COURT OF HEMPHILL COUNTY;

                NO. 2731; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING
                       _______________________________

                          ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                        _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

      Appellant appeals from an order revoking his probation. The clerk’s record was filed

on June 24, 2009, and the reporter’s record on August 7, 2009. Appellant’s counsel filed

an Anders brief on September 28, 2009, and on October 7, 2009, this Court notified

appellant by letter that he could file a response by November 6, 2009. On October 26,
2009, appellant requested an extension of time to file his response to the Anders brief,

which was granted to December 18, 2009.

       On November 9, 2009, appellant informed this Court that he had requested the

appellate record from his attorney but received no response. We then directed appellant’s

attorney to provide the record to appellant to aid in the preparation of a response.

Thereafter, counsel informed us by letter that he provided the record on September 25,

2009, but “we did not receive a copy of the Clerk’s Record from the Hemphill County

District Clerk and advised Mr. Knoop accordingly.” The district clerk’s office then sent us

correspondence disclosing that appellant’s counsel had “not checked out our copy of the

Clerk’s Record.” An attorney cannot legitimately represent that no error exists without first

reviewing the entire record. Appellant’s counsel did not do that here.

       Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 31st District Court

of Hemphill County, Texas. Upon remand, the trial court shall remove appellant’s current

attorney and appoint another to represent him in this appeal. The trial court shall further

order the newly appointed counsel to file an appellant’s brief, as per the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. Should new counsel determine, after a thorough review of the

appellate record, that the appeal is indeed frivolous, he may opt to file an Anders brief;

however, he must comport with the requirements specified in In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d
403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) and In re J.B., __ S.W.3d ___, 2009 WL 283197 (Tex. App.–El

Paso February 5, 2009, no pet. h.) before doing so.

       The deadline for filing an appellant’s brief with the clerk of this appellate court is

extended to February 1, 2010, unless further extended by this court. Any responding brief

                                             2
which the State may care to submit shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Finally, the trial

court is further directed to inform this court, in writing, of the name, address, and state bar

number of appellant’s newly appointed counsel by January 4, 2010.

       It is so ordered.

                                                   Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              3