Court Opinion

ID: 4890486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-02 23:49:25.585532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:09:32.334961
License: Public Domain

Lindsay, J.
We can see no defect in the indictment in this case. If any two or more persons shall fight together in a public place, by our statute, it constitutes an affray, or an offense, for which they are punishable by fine. The indictment charges that the appellant did so fight with one Coots in a public place. That simple allegation is sufficient to meet the requirement of the statute. It is true, the statute does define what is intended to be a public place within the meaning of the law. But this is altogether a matter of evidence, and the state must - show in sustaining the charge that the fighting was in a public place. The appellant, in pleading guilty, furnished the proof to the state in this case.
This court will not, therefore, disturb the judgment and verdict of the court below.. It is
Aeeirmed.