Court Opinion

ID: 7714095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:16:27.401938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:40:24.846046
License: Public Domain

We quash the writ as having been improvidently granted. In doing so, we do not wish to be understood as suggesting that the State should be permitted to use the writ of mandamus as a substitute for an appeal in a case where an appeal is not permitted. Ex parte Cannon, 369 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala. 1978).
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, KENNEDY, and BUTTS, JJ., concur. *Page 1318