Court Opinion

ID: 6322776
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-14 07:19:12.278552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:05.576687
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-93,422-01

                      EX PARTE STEVEN DALE MCCAIN, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                        CAUSE NO. C-372-W012057-1373308-A
                  IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM TARRANT COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14 and sentenced to 30

years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McCain v. State, No.

02-16-00411-CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, March 15, 2018). Applicant filed this application for a

writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       On Nov. 11, 2021, Applicant filed a motion to recuse the habeas judge. The judge did not

agree to recuse himself and referred the motion to the presiding judge of the administrative region.

The Presiding Judge for the Eighth Administrative Judicial Region scheduled a hearing on the
recusal motion for Jan. 6, 2022. On Jan. 11, 2022, he signed an order resetting the hearing for Jan.

20, 2022.

       The application was forwarded to this Court on Jan. 3, 2022. The district clerk properly

forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5).

However, because recusal proceedings were pending when the habeas corpus record was forwarded

to this Court, no judge has participated in the review of this writ application. TEX . R. CIV . P. 18a.

       We remand this application to the trial court. Following the recusal proceedings, the

appropriate judge shall review the pleadings and determine whether there are controverted,

previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant's confinement. TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07 § 3(c). If the court determines that there are such facts, the court shall

designate the appropriate issues and resolve them. If not, the court shall enter an order finding that

there are no unresolved issues material to the legality of Applicant's confinement and notify the

District Clerk so the writ record may be returned to this Court.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has reviewed the writ

application and resolved any fact issues, if necessary. Any issues shall be resolved within 90 days

of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the

transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with any findings of

fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this

order. TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and

shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 9, 2022
Do not publish