Court Opinion

ID: 8124692
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:04:42.141591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:10.471033
License: Public Domain

Nixon, J.
This is an application for a preliminary injunction. I have no difficulty on the question of infringement. The exhibits of the defendants’ manufacture, both in 1882 and 1884, show quite clearly, to my mind, that they are infringements of .the complainant’s patent. But the evidence of the defendants, and especially the affidavits of the expert, Weigand, throw'some doubt on its novelty. Under the circumstances, I regard it as a proper case in which to refuse an injunction, if the defendants will execute a bond to secure the complainant on the accounting, if, upon final hearing, there shall be a decree sustaining the validity of the patent. The injunction is therefore withheld, provided that the defendants, within 10 days, *597shall file a bond to the complainant corporation, in the penal sum of $10,000, conditioned for the payment of profits and damages for all subsequent infringement, if the patent shall be finally sustained; the bond to be approved by the clerk, and the defendants to file an account, under oath, every 60 days, of the rubber manufactured and sold by them, of the kind and character shown in the exhibits.