Court Opinion

ID: 994848
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:28:51.748274+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:58.127956
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-6757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DONNIE D. ANDERSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CR-94-589, CA-96-3456-2-18)

Submitted:   April 16, 1998                 Decided:   April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie D. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Anderson, Nos. CR-94-589; CA-96-3456-2-18
(D.S.C. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2