Court Opinion

ID: 9353894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-13 01:00:20.402263+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:09:42.446452
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10849         Document: 00516609200             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/12/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10849
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 12, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Angel Roman Walter Medina,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 7:22-CR-13-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Angel Roman Walter Medina has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Medina has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
   developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Medina’s claims of
   ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10849     Document: 00516609200          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/12/2023

                                   No. 22-10849

   without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
   829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Medina’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2