Court Opinion

ID: 2828089
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-08-18 18:02:11.334832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:00.981772
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-41286      Document: 00513158486         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/18/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                         August 18, 2015
                                    No. 14-41286
                                 Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DORETEO GARCIA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:13-CR-831-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Doreteo Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. Although Garcia remains subject
to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment
imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have reviewed

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-41286    Document: 00513158486    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/18/2015

                                No. 14-41286

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part
as moot, see Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

                                      2