Court Opinion

ID: 9927477
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-27 20:15:03.044736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:57.927560
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00546-CV

                                   COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                          CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

            IN RE ALICIA GONZALEZ AND NICOLE TREBILCOCK

                           On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                     Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña
                      Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva1

        Relators Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock filed a petition for writ of mandamus

through which they contend that the trial court abused its discretion by granting motions

to dismiss filed by the real parties in interest, John Blaha and the Coastal Conservation

Association (CCA). See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 27.001–011 (codifying the

Texas Citizens Participation Act).

        1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R.
47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
      Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem.

Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836,

840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148

S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial

court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re

USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,

839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

      The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

the responses filed by Blaha and the CCA, the replies thereto filed by relators, and the

applicable law, is of the opinion that relators have not met their burden to obtain relief.

Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

                                                              CLARISSA SILVA
                                                              Justice

Delivered and filed on the
25th day of January, 2024.

                                             2