Court Opinion

ID: 5984601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 08:32:13.783526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:35.759944
License: Public Domain

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Supreme Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]) is not supported by legally sufficient evidence establishing that defendant had the requisite knowledge of the weight of the controlled substance he possessed within the meaning of the statute (see, People v Ryan, 82 NY2d 497; People v Lawrence, 204 AD2d 969, Iv granted 84 NY2d 937).
The evidence is sufficient, however, to sustain a conviction of the lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03), which does not have a weight element (see, People v Lawrence, supra). Thus, we modify the judgment by reducing defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and by vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on that conviction (see, CPL 470.20 [4]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.