Court Opinion

ID: 8439785
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:38:15.853251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.574849
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s previous order denying relief, on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v. Galloway, No. 3:03-cv-00740-DCN, 2011 WL 585970 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.