Court Opinion

ID: 6318531
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-01 20:00:50.595189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:36.857152
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                        No. 21-7624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

KEVIN STEVENS, JR.,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00073-RBS-LRL-2; 2:21-
cv-00260-RBS)

Submitted: February 24, 2022                                      Decided: March 1, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Stevens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Kevin Stevens, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion

under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requesting reconsideration of the

court’s order holding Stevens’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in abeyance. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Stevens seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                               DISMISSED

                                             2