Court Opinion

ID: 9806436
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 19:04:28.785615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:05:27.204116
License: Public Domain

GUIDRY, J.,
concurs and assigns reasons.
hi concur in the result of our per curiam decision today. I write separately to point out that our reversal of the lower courts’ rulings, because they relied on the subsequent purchaser doctrine as applied in Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267, 10-2275, 10-2279, 10-2289 (La.10/25/11), 79 So.3d 246, does not address the merits of any other basis for the defendants’ exceptions or defenses, including extinguishment of the plaintiffs’ claims by confusion and prescription or peremption.