Court Opinion

ID: 9582385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:26:04.538124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:44.218417
License: Public Domain

DOOLING, J.
I concur. It is not necessary to hold that in no event can a court issue a mandatory temporary injunction. I take the correct rule to be that stated in Hagen v. Beth, 118 Cal. 330, 331 [50 P. 425] :
*350“The granting of a mandatory injunction pending the trial, and before the rights of the parties in the subject matter which the injunction is designed to affect have been definitely ascertained by the chancellor, is not permitted except in extreme cases where the right thereto is clearly established and it appears that irreparable injury will flow from its refusal.” (See 43 C.J.S. 412-413; 28 Am.Jur. 214.) The application of this rule to the facts of this case is all that is necessary to support our order.