Court Opinion

ID: 2923685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:51:22.074091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:58.901600
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-672-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE COLUMBIA - VALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.
D/B/A VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
______________________________________
____________________________   
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, In re Columbia - Valley Healthcare System, L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional
Medical Center, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October
26, 2007.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus, its appendix, and the mandamus record, is of the opinion that relator has
not shown itself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ
of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
	Furthermore, on October 30, 2007, real party in interest, Edward McGlynn,
M.D., filed a motion to abate/stay relator's petition for writ of mandamus.  Having
denied relator's petition for writ of mandamus, we deny real party's motion to
abate/stay as moot.
								PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this 31st day of October, 2007.
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).