Court Opinion

ID: 9777348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 20:07:55.993856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:52.717434
License: Public Domain

RENDLEN, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The crimes of second degree robbery and armed criminal action,1 for which the defendant was charged and convicted, occurred on January 24, 1979. His second degree robbery conviction, § 569.030, RSMo 1978, resulted in a 15 year term of imprisonment, while under the armed criminal action conviction, § 571.015, RSMo 1978, he received a 75 year sentence.
I respectfully dissent in part and concur in part for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in State v. Kane, 629 S.W.2d 370 (Mo.App.), decided concurrently herewith. I would affirm.

. There is no issue regarding the kidnapping conviction and its accompanying 15 year sentence considered by the majority in this appeal. Extended terms of imprisonment (15 years each) were additionally imposed for the robbery and kidnapping convictions under § 558.016, RSMo 1978.