Court Opinion

ID: 9947011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-01 21:01:08.980268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:45.341012
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2285      Doc: 18        Filed: 02/29/2024   Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-2285

        ROBERT JEROME BASKINS; CANDACE M. BASKINS,

                            Plaintiffs - Appellants,

                     and

        ROBERT JOSEPH BASKINS; EVA BASKINS,

                            Plaintiffs,

                     v.

        EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC;
        EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Columbia. Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (3:22-cv-03471-SAL)

        Submitted: February 27, 2024                              Decided: February 29, 2024

        Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Robert Jerome Baskins, Candace M. Baskins, Appellants Pro Se. Lyndey R. Z. Bryant,
        ADAMS & REESE, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Amanda Paige Loughmiller,
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2285      Doc: 18         Filed: 02/29/2024    Pg: 2 of 3

        QUILLING SELANDER LOWNDS WINSLETT MOSER, Plano, Texas; Eric Fristedt
        Barton, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2285      Doc: 18         Filed: 02/29/2024      Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Robert Jerome Baskins and Candace M. Baskins appeal the district court’s order

        adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their civil action for

        lack of prosecution and failure to comply with federal rules and a court order. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

        order. Baskins v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., No. 3:22-cv-03471-SAL (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2023).

        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     3