Court Opinion

ID: 6258537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 21:53:50.43449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:38.413672
License: Public Domain

Opinion
Per Curiam,
Appellees presented a claim against the executors of Stern’s Estate for |2500 for breach of Stern’s covenant in his ten year written lease with appellees dated November 30, 1955.. The lease permitted an assignment by the tenant and also pertinently provided: “. . . if the . . . assignee, . . . shall discontinue the operation of the theatre or abandon the same, Norbert Stern shall pay to the Lessors Twenty-five Hundred (|2500.00) Dollars as liquidated damages (and not as rent) by reason thereof.”
Stern’s executors took this appeal from a decree of distribution which allowed appellees’ claim.
*480Although the Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority did not condemn the leased premises until September, 1961, Stern’s assignee (a Stern-owned corporation) abandoned the premises on April 30, 1961. The principal argument of the executors is that the word “abandon” meant a voluntary abandonment. More specifically, the executors contend (a) that the plans of the Authority for redevelopment of a large area which included the leased premises, had been widely publicized since 1957; and (b) that as a result of this publicity many desirable patrons moved from the neighborhood of the leased premises; and (c) these published plans caused Stern’s assignee to lose so much business that it was compelled to abandon the leased premises on April 30, 1961; and (d) these very unusual circumstances which had not been within the contemplation of the parties at the date of the lease, justified an abandonment of the premises and a termination of the lease, and consequently relieved Stern of his promise to pay the aforesaid $52500.
We find no merit in this or in any of the other contentions of the appellants.
Decree affirmed; costs to be paid by appellants.