Court Opinion

ID: 1001231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:52:25.580826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:00.145847
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7685

ROMEL ANEMONT,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN D. MULLER, Superintendent,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-99-261)

Submitted:   March 23, 2000                 Decided:   March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romel Anemont, Appellant Pro Se.    Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Romel Anemont appeals the district court’s order denying re-

lief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999).   Because Anemont’s claims are procedurally barred, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.     See

Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 297-98 (1989).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2