Court Opinion

ID: 9767114
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:10:17.889492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:28.708841
License: Public Domain

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DICE, Commissioner.
Appellant insists that in addition to the alleged jury misconduct which was discussed in our opinion on original submission, the jury discussed the number of years which he would be required to serve if he were assessed punishment of fifty years.
*557While the record reflects that there was a discussion in the jury room with reference to how long appellant would be required to serve if he were assessed punishment of fifty years, there was a conflict in the testimony as to what was actually said.
The record does not reflect any undisputed testimony showing a misstatement of fact relative to the granting of parole.
In refusing to grant a new trial, the court did not err. Torres v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 113, 331 S.W.2d 929.
Remaining convinced that a proper disposition of the case was made in our opinion on original submission, the motion for rehearing is overruled.
Opinion approved by the court.