Court Opinion

ID: 3599008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:45:57.97156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:53:39.774153
License: Public Domain

It is unnecessary in this case, as it was in Zobrest v. EastBuffalo Brewing Co. (210 N.Y. 626) and Chilcott v. BroadwayBrewing  M. Co. (210 N.Y. 633), to construe the contract in suit. In those cases the plaintiffs, while still in default, attempted to recover their liquor tax certificates. In this case the plaintiff brought the action on the theory that an absolute assignment was obtained from him by fraud and has been beaten on that *Page 723 
issue. It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine whether the assignment was absolute, or only as security, or to decide what remedy, if any, is available to the plaintiff in case of the wrongful disposition of the liquor tax certificate by the assignee.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., WERNER, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, MILLER, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.