Court Opinion

ID: 2659354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-02 20:23:06.431098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:11.824112
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               April 2, 2014
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
REGINA BUCKLEY,                                                               OF WEST VIRGINIA

WIDOW OF FRED BUCKLEY,
Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 12-1101 (BOR Appeal No. 2046971)
                   (Claim No. 930069722)

DONALDSON MINE COMPANY
AND SHREWSBURY COAL COMPANY,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
      Petitioner Regina Buckley, by Robert M. Williams, her attorney, appeals the decision of
the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Donaldson Mine Company and
Shrewsbury Mine Company, by Ann Rembrandt, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated August 28, 2012, in
which the Board affirmed a February 22, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s August 12, 2010,
decision denying Ms. Buckley dependent’s benefits. The Court has carefully reviewed the
records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

       Mr. Buckley was a tipple operator/coal sampler at Donaldson Mine Company and
Shrewsbury Coal Company. Mr. Buckley suffered from occupational pneumoconiosis and was
previously awarded a 5% award for occupational pneumoconiosis in 1991. In 1997, an Office of
Judges’ Order concluded that Mr. Buckley had been fully compensated for his occupational

                                                1
pneumoconiosis by his previous award. Mr. Buckley underwent a chemical cardioversion for
atrial fibrillation and had a left upper lobe wedge biopsy. After the biopsy, Mr. Buckley
developed bleeding in the right hemithorax that led to a re-exploration. Mr. Buckley died on July
28, 2008, and Ms. Buckley requested dependent’s benefits for Mr. Buckley’s death. The
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board found that occupational pneumoconiosis did not play a
material contributing role in Mr. Buckley’s death. The claims administrator denied Ms.
Buckley’s application for dependent’s benefits based on the findings of the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board.

         The Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s decision and held that
occupational pneumoconiosis did not cause or contribute to Mr. Buckley’s death in a material
degree. On appeal, Ms. Buckley asserts that she should be awarded dependent’s benefits because
occupational pneumoconiosis contributed to Mr. Buckley’s death as found by Dominic Gaziano,
M.D., and Donald L. Rasmussen, M.D. Donaldson Mine Company and Shrewsbury Mine
Company maintain that John Willis, M.D., the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s
radiologist, stated that the x-ray findings could be consistent with other conditions and that the
CT scan established Mr. Buckley did not have occupational pneumoconiosis but rather Usual
Interstitial Pneumonia. Donaldson Mine Company and Shrewsbury Mine Company further
maintain that the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board found the opinions of Dr. Rasmussen and
Dr. Gaziano were not persuasive or credible and the existence of occupational pneumoconiosis
proved to be faulty.

        The Office of Judges concluded that Mr. Buckley’s death was not caused or contributed
to in a material degree by occupational pneumoconiosis based on the findings of the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board testified that the
x-ray films revealed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and that the CT scan from July 9, 2008, was
more convincing that Mr. Buckley had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis rather than occupational
pneumoconiosis. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board further testified that Mr. Buckley
died from post-operative complications and found the biopsy was negative for occupational
pneumoconiosis. Ultimately, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board concluded that
occupational pneumoconiosis did not cause nor contribute in a material degree to Mr. Buckley’s
death. The Office of Judges found that Mr. Buckley had non-work-related idiopathic pulmonary
fibrosis. The Office of Judges discounted Dr. Rasmussen’s and Dr. Gaziano’s opinions because
the pathologists, including Stephen T. Bush, M.D., and Everett F. Oesterling Jr, M.D., found that
occupational pneumoconiosis was not present. The Office of Judges held that occupational
pneumoconiosis did not cause or contribute to Mr. Buckley’s death in a material degree. The
Board of Review reached the same reasoned conclusions in its decision of August 28, 2012. We
agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                2
                                   Affirmed.

ISSUED: April 2, 2014

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

DISSENTING:
Justice Margaret L. Workman

                               3