Court Opinion

ID: 318572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:55:11+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:22.123117
License: Public Domain

495 F.2d 763
86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2655, 74 Lab.Cas.  P 10,052
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, The UnitedStates Playing Card Company, Intervenor,v.CINCINNATI LOCAL 271, LITHOGGRAPHERS & PHOTOENGRAVERSINTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Respondents.
No. 73-1922.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued April 4, 1974.Decided April 16, 1974.

Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Richard A. Cohen, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.
Harold S. Freeman, Gregory L. Hellrung, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for intervenor, The United States Playing Card Co.; Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel.
Eugene Cotton, Russell Woody, Chicago, Ill., on brief, for respondents; Cotton, Watt, Jones, King & Bowlus, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.
Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
This cause came on to be heard on the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel.  Upon due consideration thereof, the court is of the opinion that while it might have been better to defer the issues therein to arbitration, the Board's failure to do so does not amount to an abuse of discretion, and it further appearing to the court that the decision and order of the Board, reported at 204 NLRB No. 65, are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, now therefore

2
It is ordered that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.