Court Opinion

ID: 9392037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-03 20:00:51.913098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:30.099116
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-14028    Document: 22-1     Date Filed: 05/03/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-14028
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       SCOTT P. HAINES,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cr-00004-MCR-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-14028      Document: 22-1     Date Filed: 05/03/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-14028

       Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Donald M. Sheehan, counsel for Scott Haines in this direct
       criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
       tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor-
       nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
       ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Haines’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED.