Court Opinion

ID: 9399412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-02 21:00:35.612244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:06.419538
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033      Doc: 26         Filed: 06/01/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2033

        ANA Y MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

                            Petitioner,

                     v.

        MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

                            Respondent.

        On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

        Submitted: April 20, 2023                                         Decided: June 1, 2023

        Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton,
        Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation
        Counsel, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED
        STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033     Doc: 26         Filed: 06/01/2023    Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Ana Martinez Hernandez (Martinez), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

        for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to

        reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Martinez’s claims and find

        no abuse of discretion. See Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v.

        Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

        for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Martinez Hernandez (B.I.A. Sept. 1, 2022).

        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                            PETITION DENIED

                                                   2