Court Opinion

ID: 748088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 23:14:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:34.468117
License: Public Domain

129 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.JORGE G. ACEBAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-50330.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 22, 1997**Filed Oct. 23, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Before:  THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge, Presiding

3
Jorge Acebal appeals from his 21-month sentence and conviction after his guilty plea to conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371) and receipt of stolen goods (18 U.S.C. § 659).  His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

4
Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

5
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3