Court Opinion

ID: 8488448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-22 01:00:16.593829+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:50:11.755091
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10518     Document: 00516553298         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/21/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit
                                  No. 22-10518
                                Summary Calendar                            FILED
                                                                    November 21, 2022
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                Clerk

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Marcos D. Thomason,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:11-CR-250-25

   Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcos D.
   Thomason has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Thomason has filed a response. We

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10518    Document: 00516553298         Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/21/2022

                                 No. 22-10518

   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein, as well as Thomason’s response.      We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2