Court Opinion

ID: 2926730
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:37:07.529768+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:13.980901
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00086-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
KYLE G. STOCKTON, AS REPRESENTATIVE 
OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET 
ELIZABETH BAILEY, DECEASED, 	Appellant,

v.

CHARLES M. MORGAN, JR. AND MARY P. MORGAN,	Appellees. 
_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Probate Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the Probate Court of
Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number P-30,028-A.  Appellant has filed an agreed
motion to dismiss the appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's agreed motion
to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed
the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our
mandate will issue forthwith.

							PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 9th day of July, 2009.