Court Opinion

ID: 6334430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-23 00:00:21.416071+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:37.315481
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10333     Document: 00516291851         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/22/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                       April 22, 2022
                                  No. 21-10333
                                Summary Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                           Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Gustavo Jimenez-Garcia,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:20-CR-274-1

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Gustavo Jimenez-Garcia has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez-Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10333     Document: 00516291851          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/22/2022

                                   No. 21-10333

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as
   well as Jimenez-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment
   that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2