Court Opinion

ID: 8634336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:42:42.801524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:52.813349
License: Public Domain

BENEDICT, District Judge.
I greatly doubt whether a party can as a matter of right obtain the .release of a vessel from custody by giving a bond under section 941 of the United States Revised Statutes after a default has been entered upon the return of the process. It seems to be the intention that the bond should be approved and either filed or returned by the marshal for the purpose of being filed with the process, and it is plainly *871intended that the bond should be given before any decree has been rendered in the cause. Of course, as in other cases, a stipulation for value may be substituted for property in custody at any time, by leave of the court,, but that is a different thing from giving the bond provided for in section 941. The difficulty here is that there has been no default and no publication of notice upon which a default can now be táken. The right, therefore, to have a bond approved in pursuance of section 941 still exists, and may be exercised without any condition other than is prescribed in the section.
The application, therefore, to have terms imposed as a condition of being allowed to bond under section 941 must be denied.
The bond, being regular in form, and the sureties having justified on due notice to the libellant, must be approved.