Court Opinion

ID: 4237715
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-19 14:24:31.199612+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:15:50.274992
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wiest, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-187.]

                      CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. WIEST.
 [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wiest, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-187.]
   (No. 2016-0263—Submitted January 17, 2018—Decided January 19, 2018.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
         {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher David Wiest, Attorney
Registration No. 0077931, last known address in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky.
         {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 19, 2016,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent
from the practice of law for a period of two years, with the second year stayed on
the condition that he engage in no further misconduct, finds that respondent has
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R.
V(24).
         {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
         {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
         {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wiest, 148 Ohio St.3d
683, 2016-Ohio-8166, 72 N.E.3d 621.
         O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, O’NEILL, FISCHER,
and DEWINE, JJ., concur.
                             ________________________