Court Opinion

ID: 8457398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 04:37:04.720788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:05.564720
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude *722the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.