Court Opinion

ID: 8455875
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:46:47.443644+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.840589
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Broderick Patterson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Kennedy, No. 8:11-cv-02487-DKC (D. Md. filed June 25, 2012 & entered June 26, 2012; Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.