Court Opinion

ID: 8681751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:29:01.117425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.774207
License: Public Domain

*339Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lance C. Tew appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tew’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tew has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant Tew’s motion to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED