Court Opinion

ID: 9730330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 15:08:38.859504+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:05.761616
License: Public Domain

Krivosha, C.J.,
concurring in part, and in part dissenting.
With the exception of that portion of the majority opinion which affirms the imposition of the death penalty, I concur in all that the majority has said, and believe that, but for the issue involving the imposition of the death penalty, Moore’s claim for post conviction relief is without merit. However, because of my view regarding the imposition of the death penalty and its constitutional implications, as more particularly set out in my dissent in State v. Moore, 210 Neb. 457, 316 N.W.2d 33 (1982), I must again dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which, by affirming the trial court’s denial of post conviction relief, affirmed the imposition of the death penalty in this case.