Court Opinion

ID: 8680747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:01:32.921902+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.274592
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Juan Manuel Fernandez appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Fernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fernandez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.