Court Opinion

ID: 9886126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 15:39:11.879124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:15.590217
License: Public Domain

Riley, Judge, dissenting.
[24] I find the majority's analysis concerning the trial court's statements about the authority of both senior judges and Community Corrections is wholly irrelevant to the issue before this court on appeal. Therefore, I dissent. Simply, Indiana Code section 33-23-2-4 authorized the trial court to modify the January 18, 2017 order granting placement in Community Corrections within ninety days. During that timeframe, based upon the recommendation of Community Corrections that Michael Flowers was not qualified for the program, the trial court properly ordered his revocation in accordance with Indiana Code section 35-38-2.6-5(4). Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court.