Court Opinion

ID: 2932423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:57:20.157982+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:59.117485
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-05-00933-CR
____________
 
VICTOR OMENI IGWE AKA STEVE ARTHUR
DOUGLAS, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the
230th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
759,423
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Victor Omeni Igwe appeals the trial court=s denial of his motion for
post-conviction DNA testing.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01‑.05.  Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a
professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced.  See High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to
appellant.  Appellant was advised of the
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503,
510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this
date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. 
Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing
to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed April 20, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson,
Fowler, and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).