Court Opinion

ID: 9909423
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-13 15:03:15.158411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:24.530913
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DIVISION
                              MERCIER, C. J.,
                       MCFADDEN, P. J., and RICKMAN, J.

                     NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be
                     physically received in our clerk’s office within ten
                     days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.
                                https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

                                                                   December 13, 2023

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
 A21A1215. BELL v. THE STATE.

       MERCIER, Chief Judge.

       In Bell v. State, 362 Ga. App. 687 (870 SE2d 20) (2022), this Court, due to

insufficiency of the evidence, reversed Cortney Bell’s convictions for murder in the second

degree and cruelty to children in the second degree relating to the death of Bell’s infant

daughter, Caliyah. Id. at 699-702 (1), 702-703 (2). We also ruled, however, that the evidence

was sufficient to support a felony charge against Bell for contributing to the dependency of a

minor, and we affirmed that conviction. Id. at 703-706 (3). Thereafter, our Supreme Court

granted certiorari “to determine whether [this Court] erred in holding that the evidence was

legally sufficient to support Bell’s conviction on that charge.” Bell, 2023 WL 6976484 at *1

(Ga., October 24, 2023). Our Supreme Court held: “In the absence of evidence from which

a reasonable jury could infer that Bell’s conduct proximately caused Caliyah’s death, the
evidence presented to the jury was simply insufficient as a matter of constitutional due process

to support her conviction for felony contributing to the dependency of a minor.” Id. at *6

(citation omitted).1

       In light of our Supreme Court’s ruling, we vacate Division 3 of our prior opinion in

which we found the evidence to be sufficient to support Bell’s conviction for contributing to

the dependency of a minor, we adopt as our own the Supreme Court’s opinion holding that

the evidence was, instead, insufficient, and we reverse the trial court’s judgment, as the evidence

was insufficient to support any of Bell’s three convictions.

       Judgment reversed. Dillard, P. J., and Land, J., concur.

       1
        The Supreme Court made clear that its “review on certiorari [was] limited to the
merits of [this Court’s] decision related to Bell’s conviction for felony contributing to the
dependency of a minor[,]” not our decisions regarding the insufficiency of the evidence to
support Bell’s convictions for murder in the second degree and cruelty to children in the
second degree. Bell, 2023 WL 6976484 at *1, n. 1.
                                                2