Court Opinion

ID: 9376590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-03 06:05:35.134898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:07.675287
License: Public Domain

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to
                  revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

                           STATE OF MICHIGAN

                              COURT OF APPEALS

STACY HUBBARD,                                                         FOR PUBLICATION
                                                                       March 2, 2023
               Plaintiff-Appellee,

v                                                                      No. 357791
                                                                       Montmorency Circuit Court
                                                                       LC No. 20-004809-NH
LISA STIER, N.P., AND MUNSON
HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL, also known as MUNSON
HEALTHCARE OMH MEDICAL GROUP-
LEWISTON,

               Defendants-Appellants.

Before: SHAPIRO, P.J., and GADOLA and YATES, JJ.

SHAPIRO, P.J. (concurring).

        I concur in the result reached by the majority, but based on a different analysis.
        AO 2020-3 was adopted on March 23, 2020. The language of that order is clear: “For all
deadlines applicable to the commencement of all civil and probate case-types, . . . and any
statutory prerequisites to the filing of such a pleading or motion, any day that falls during the state
of emergency declared by the Governor related to COVID-19 is not included for purposes of MCR
1.108(1).” (Emphasis added). The Governor’s state of emergency began on March 10, 2020.

        AO 2020-4 issued on May 1, 2020, amended AO 2020-3 to provide that it “does not
suspend or toll any time period that must elapse before the commencement of an action or
proceeding.” I agree that under AO 2020-4, the time tolled by the filing of a notice of intent (NOI)
is not extended. However, I would hold that the number of days between March 10, 2020, and

                                                 -1-
May 1, 2020, i.e., 53 days, was tolled because during that time AO 2020-3 (without the amendment
provided by AO 2020-4) was in effect.1

        In this case, plaintiff’s NOI was filed on February 13, 2020, and normally the 182-day
period would have expired on August 13, 2020. The 53 days of tolling would extend that date to
October 5, 2020. Four days remained in the statute of limitations after the NOI waiting period and
so the deadline to file was October 9, 2020. The complaint was not filed until November 3, 2020,
and so was untimely.2

                                                            /s/ Douglas B. Shapiro

1
  Allowing for the 53-day tolling under AO 2020-3 prior to its amendment would not have altered
the result in Armijo v Bronson Methodist Hospital, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2023)
(Docket No. 358728).
2
 The statute of limitations itself—absent tolling resulting from the mailing of the NOI—would
have expired February 17, 2020.

                                               -2-