Court Opinion

ID: 5418287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:22:29.49299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:07.405504
License: Public Domain

Lewis, J.
This is an action to restrain the defendants from interfering with a certain agreement made by the defendant All American Investing Company, Inc., through the defendant Keily *707as its president; also from interfering with and revoking certain powers of attorney executed by it.
It is undisputed that at the time of the execution of the papers in question the legal title to all of the stock of the defendant All American Investing Company, Inc., was in the defendant Keily. While Keily and one Hastings testified that the, stock was owned by them with one Feeley, the testimony of Hastings on a former trial that he had no interest, beneficial or otherwise, in the stock is . directly in contradiction of his testimony on this trial.
Even if it be assumed, and I do not-so decide, that there was a beneficial interest in others, the legal title was in Keily, and, as was stated in the dissenting opinion in People’s Trust Co. v. O’Meara, 204 App. Div. 268: " ' The right to vote follows the legal ownership, and the corporation has nothing to do with the equities between the owner and third persons.’ ”
At the time of the execution of the agreement there were but two directors, the defendant Keily and the plaintiff Barnes. Keily was in complete charge and control of the corporation. Barnes was a salaried employee, having no interest, stock or otherwise, and was a dummy director.
Defendants contend that the board of directors never convened. In view of the stock holding and the sole directorship, such a contention is manifestly unsound. Gerard v. Empire Square Realty Co., 195 App. Div. 244, 248.
The corporation had the right to make the agreements in question and, therefore, Keily, as its president, had the right to execute them.
Judgment is directed for the plaintiff, with costs.
Judgment accordingly.