Court Opinion

ID: 4175311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-07 19:12:43.349557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:09.183924
License: Public Domain

People v Murphy (2017 NY Slip Op 04468)

People v Murphy

2017 NY Slip Op 04468

Decided on June 7, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 7, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2014-06516

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vJoseph Murphy, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1740/13)

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Amy E. Markel of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), imposed July 29, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Ellis, 146 AD3d 806; People v Bruzzo, 136 AD3d 1050; People v Quezada, 122 AD3d 948; People v Angelis, 94 AD3d 902) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court