Court Opinion

ID: 2775426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-02 08:08:21.204602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:27:57.451611
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                               FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                          ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name:         Blake Alan Cotton v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number:       01-14-00444-CR

Trial court case number: 1421756

Trial court:                 248th District Court of Harris County

       The record on this appeal is incomplete. Only a portion of the clerk’s record has been
provided to this Court, and we have been notified by the court reporter that arrangements have
not been made for payment of the record.
       We currently lack a sufficient record to determine if appellant is indigent for purposes of
appeal and entitled to appointed counsel and access to the full clerk’s record and reporter’s
record without charge.
        Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at
which appellant shall be present in person. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a
date for said hearing and notify the parties, including appellant. If appellant is now incarcerated,
he may appear by closed video teleconference.1 We direct the trial court to make appropriate
written findings of fact and conclusions of law and to execute any necessary orders on these
issues:

           1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;
           2) If so, whether appellant is now indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, if
              indigent,
                  a. appoint counsel on appeal, and
                  b. order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record with this Court at no
                      cost to appellant;
           3) If appellant is not indigent:
                  a. whether he has retained an attorney to file a brief, and, if so, obtain the

1      Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a
       simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between
       the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and
       his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the
       attorney representing the State.

                                                       1
                      name, address, and telephone number of retained counsel;
                   b. if appellant has not retained counsel, the trial court shall admonish
                      appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and
                           i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently
                              waiving his right to counsel; or,
                          ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by
                              which appellant must hire an attorney.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); Oliver, 872 S.W.2d at 716; Minjares, 577
S.W.2d at 224; cf. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(g).

        The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file
the reporter’s record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order
Additionally, the trial court’s findings and recommendations and any orders issued pursuant to
this hearing shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later
than 30 days from the date of this order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a
certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the
date of this order.

        The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active
docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental
clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.

       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown
                   

Date: January 29, 2015

                                                 2