Court Opinion

ID: 4207811
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-09-29 19:13:00.498385+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:39.161163
License: Public Domain

People v Ortiz (2017 NY Slip Op 06778)

People v Ortiz

2017 NY Slip Op 06778

Decided on September 29, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 29, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

1012 KA 14-00582

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vANTONIO ORTIZ, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John L. DeMarco, J.), rendered January 22, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to charge the jury on the defense of mistake of fact (see § 15.20 [1] [a]). Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Streeter, 21 AD3d 1291, 1291-1292, lv denied 6 NY3d 898), and we decline to exercise our power to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: September 29, 2017
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court