Court Opinion

ID: 6325376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-22 09:11:47.722989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:02.055513
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                     NO. 03-21-00580-CR

                                  Ex parte Verdell Brown, Jr.

                 FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
            NO. 71473-A, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Verdell Brown, Jr., an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, filed a

post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure that was subsequently denied by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

(CCA) without written order. See Tex. Code Crim. App. art. 11.07. Brown seeks to appeal the

CCA’s denial as well as the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court with

respect to the application.

               Article 11.07 provides the exclusive remedy for post-conviction relief from a

felony conviction in which the applicant seeks relief from a judgment imposing a penalty other

than death. See id. The article vests complete jurisdiction over such relief with the CCA. See

id., at §§ 3, 5. “While a post-conviction application for writ of habeas relief under article 11.07

must be filed in the court of original conviction, that court does not decide the merits of the

application, but simply makes any necessary findings of fact and forwards the record to the

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a final ruling.” Ex parte Taylor, No. 03-16-00461-CR,
2016 WL 6407301, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 28, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated

for publication).

               Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to

proceedings under article 11.07. See In re Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.—Austin

2012, no pet.) (“Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to

proceedings under article 11.07.”); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196–97 (Tex. App.—Houston

[14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (observing intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction

over “post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases” under article 11.07). We therefore

lack jurisdiction to review the CCA’s denial of Brown’s application for writ of habeas corpus

or to review the convicting court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.        See Taylor,

2016 WL 6407301, at *1. Brown’s appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.

App. P. 43.2(f).

                                             __________________________________________
                                             Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 16, 2022

Do Not Publish

                                               2