Court Opinion

ID: 5152993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 02:05:07.455019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:31.568193
License: Public Domain

[20] I concur that this conviction should be affirmed, but insofar as this Information was filed on the same date that the Information was filed in Pittsburg County District Court, [See,Anderson v. State, Okla. Cr. 556 P.2d 1006, delivered this date], for a similar offense of Injury to Public Buildings, I believe the two Informations should have been consolidated for trial at the same time as provided for in 22 O.S. 1971 § 438[22-438], and, therefore the sentences should have been made to run concurrently. Consequently, I believe the sentences on the two convictions constituting twenty (20) years is excessive. I dissent to the consecutive provisions of the two sentences. *Page 1014