Court Opinion

ID: 2895377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 23:52:38.698633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:32.012776
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-07-0164-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL A

                                      JULY 20, 2007

                          ______________________________

                      ANTIONE DESHAN GENTRY, APPELLANT

                                             v.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

                     NO. 54,585-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

                         _______________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                                 ON MOTION TO ABATE

       Appellant Antione Deshan Gentry perfected appeal from a judgment finding him

guilty of possession of a controlled substance on his plea of guilty. The guilty plea was the

result of a plea agreement made after the trial court denied his written pretrial motion to

suppress evidence. No written order on the motion appears in the record, nor does the

docket sheet reflect denial of the motion. The only evidence in the record of the ruling is
the recitation in the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal that “matters were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial[.]”

       Pending before the court is appellant’s motion to abate the appeal to permit the trial

court to sign a written order reflecting its ruling. Counsel has provided a letter from the trial

judge indicating his decision to deny the motion to suppress and directing preparation of

a written order by the prosecuting attorney. The letter does not appear in the record.

       The failure to obtain a written ruling prior to trial is not fatal to appellant’s right to

challenge pretrial rulings on written motions in a plea bargained case. See Salinas v.

State, No. 04-06-00427-CR, 2007 WL 595121 (Tex.App.–San Antonio February 28, 2007,

pet. ref’d). The written order appellant seeks is, in effect, the order being appealed and is

a required part of the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A), 34.5(a)(5). We

grant appellant’s motion, abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

execution of a written order consistent with its ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress.

The trial court shall cause the order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be

filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before August 10, 2007.

                                                     Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                                2