Court Opinion

ID: 9503218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 19:38:31.433197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:19.708121
License: Public Domain

BALMER, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority’s decision that the ex parte contacts alleged in the petition for reconsideration do not constitute a basis for granting the relief that Farmers has *529requested. However, for the reasons previously expressed in my dissent, Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co., 350 Or 336, 370, 258 P3d 1199 (2011) (Balmer, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to adhere to its prior opinion without modification.
Landau, J., joins in this opinion.