Court Opinion

ID: 656351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.434096
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 817
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Moscoe ENDICOTT, Petitioner,v.DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;  Vandyke Brothers CoalCompany, Respondents.
No. 92-1627.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  December 8, 1992.Decided:  October 13, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.  (91-1237-BLA)
Moscoe Endicott, Petitioner Pro Se.
Michael John Denney, Jill M. Otte, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.;  Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, D .C., for Respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Moscoe Endicott seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992).  Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.  Endicott v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 91-1237-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 26, 1991 & Apr. 16, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED