Court Opinion

ID: 4829739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-22 17:41:46.173424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:23.687695
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
| (Writ granted in part; case remanded. The District Court is ordered to conduct an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue of whether relator is entitled to a new trial based on the victim’s recantation. See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972); Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); see also State v. Pierre, 13-0873 (La. 10/15/13), 125 So.3d 403; State v. Conway, 01-2808 (La. 4/12/02), 816 So.2d 290. Relator’s remaining claims are untimely, see La.C.Cr.P. Art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189, and in all other respects, the application is denied.
CLARK, J., dissents and would deny.
CRICHTON, J., dissents and assigns reasons.