Court Opinion

ID: 9833630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:54:26.8837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:04.532178
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We are passing upon each motion for rehearing separately, the one of St._ Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railroad and the one for the Texas-Mexican Railway.
Counsel are mistaken in contending, in the motions for rehearing, that we did not pass on the separate assignments separately. We considered and passed upon all the assignments and propositions as contained in the separate brief of each party fully and completely. We did not see the necessity of writing two separate opinions to do so, when it could more easily be done in one opinion, as counsel seem to think we should have. We have again gone over, and very carefully considered again, the whole case, separate briefs, assignments, and the two motions for rehearing, and find nothing new that has not already been considered.
The two motions for rehearing are overruled.