Court Opinion

ID: 9389831
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-26 15:04:21.419562+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:30.070146
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 26, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1282
                       Lower Tribunal No. 22-11560
                          ________________

                              City of Miami,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                             Mia Casa, LLC,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Lourdes Simon, Judge.

      Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant City
Attorney, for appellant.

     Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., and Amy Brigham Boulris and
Michael B. Green, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See City of Miami Beach v. Clevelander Ocean, L.P., 338

So. 3d 16, 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (concluding that “competent, substantial

evidence support[ed] the decision by the trial court to preserve the status

quo pending the final resolution of the issues presented”); see also TJ Mgmt.

Grp., L.L.C v. Zidon, 990 So. 2d 623, 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“In considering

a request for an injunction, the trial court has wide discretion to grant, deny,

modify or dissolve a temporary injunction, and an appellate court will not

intercede unless an abuse of discretion has been shown.”); Sun Cruz

Casinos, L.L.C v. City of Hollywood, 844 So. 2d 681, 684–85 (Fla. 4th DCA

2003) (“Although the party raising estoppel must prove the required elements

by clear and convincing evidence, the trial court’s findings should not be

overturned on appeal unless the findings are clearly erroneous or lacking in

evidentiary support.”) (citation omitted); Bruce v. City of Deerfield Beach, 423

So. 2d 404, 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (explaining that the concept of

administrative exhaustion “is not a strict jurisdictional matter but a flexible

concept tailored to the administrative statutes and circumstances”)

(quotation omitted).

                                       2