Court Opinion

ID: 9368151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-02 21:00:48.433616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:05.850662
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7094      Doc: 11         Filed: 02/01/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 21-7094

        JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; PHILIP A. BADDOUR;
        KIMBERLY D. GRANDE; ERIK A. HOOKS; TODD ISHEE; KENNETH
        BEAVER,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-ct-03366-M)

        Submitted: November 1, 2022                                       Decided: February 1, 2023

        Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RICHARDSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jonathan James Newell, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7094      Doc: 11          Filed: 02/01/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Jonathan James Newell appeals the district court’s order dismissing without

        prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may

        be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii). ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Newell v. N.C.

        Indus. Comm’n, No. 5:20-ct-03366-M (E.D.N.C. July 16, 2021). We deny Newell’s

        petition for an initial hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

               ∗
                 The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final, appealable order because
        the district court dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v.
        DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 791, 798 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).

                                                      2