Court Opinion

ID: 5247783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:04:30.692798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:53.650771
License: Public Domain

Sewell, J.:
This proceeding was commenced to, condemn certain land, water and water rights owned by the defendant. The defendant appeared in the proceeding upon the return day of the petition but did not interpose an answer. Judgment of condemnation was entered and the court appointed three commissioners to ascertain the compensation to be made to the owner for the property and fixed the time and place for the first meeting of the commissioners.
On the same day an order was made granting an application for immediate possession of the property.
The only question presented by this appeal is, does the statute authorize the court to award temporary possession of the property where no answer has been interposed.
It was expressly held in New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Reusens (151 App. Div. 458) that where the defendant fails to answer the court is without power to award immediate possession. The court there said: “ It is to avoid the delay before the entry of judgment, not that subsequent thereto, that section 3380 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed.”
The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs.
All concurred, except Kellogg, P. J., not voting.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.