Court Opinion

ID: 4393207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-02 14:00:26.376181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:00.047959
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-12670   Date Filed: 05/02/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-12670
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00066-MMH-JRK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JAIRUS LEE QUAINTANCE,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (May 2, 2019)

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-12670    Date Filed: 05/02/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Jairus Quaintance in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the revocation of Quaintance’s supervised release and related

sentence is AFFIRMED.

                                         2