Court Opinion

ID: 9672649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:58:27.839889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:30:16.590870
License: Public Domain

DONNELLY, Judge,
concurring.
In State ex rel. Morasch v. Kimberlin, 654 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Mo. banc 1983), this Court held that prohibition will lie to prevent an excess of jurisdiction but “that we should not continue the unfettered use of the writ of prohibition to allow interlocutory review of trial court error.”
In State ex rel. McNary v. Hais, 670 S.W.2d 494, 497 (Mo. banc 1984), this Court held that prohibition will lie where “[r]ela-tors do not have adequate remedy by way of appeal.”
In this case, the court has jurisdiction but there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal and, therefore, prohibition will lie.
I concur.