Court Opinion

ID: 7382165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:07:35.631028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:25.078947
License: Public Domain

Chief-Justice Robertson
delivered the opinion of the court.
FROM the facts exhibited by the record, in this case, we are of opinion that the plaintiff in error was improperly forced into trial, at the term the judgment was obtained against him. On his motion for a continuance, he swore to facts calculated to shew, that by the conduct of his adversary, he had been thrown off his guard, and induced to omit to make the necessary preparation for his defence, which otherwise he would have made. The circuit court overruled his motion for a continuance, as it seerns, because, by the directions of his lawyer, he refused to reduce to writing in the form of affidavit, the facts sworn to. It would have been proper to require a written affidavit in the first instance, but after he had been sworn and examined, and had made statements entitling him to a continuance, it was wrong to force him to trial, merely because he would not oiler a written affidavit.
The judgment must be reversed with costs, and the cause remanded for new proceedings to be had.