Court Opinion

ID: 9865980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 23:59:27.007613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:33.059512
License: Public Domain

O’NIELL, C. J.,
dissents from the ruling allowing an attorney’s fee for dissolving a temporary restraining order, and is of the opinion that, even if a restraining order should be deemed an injunction, the allowing of an attorney’s fee for dissolving it, without proof that the fee was paid or the obligation therefor incurred, in a case other than an injunction arresting the execution of a money *143judgment, is contrary to the rulings in Whitney-Central Bank v. Sinnott, 136 La. 95, 66 So. 551; Alfano v. Franek, 159 La. 498, 105 So. 598; and Burglass v. Villere, 170 La. 805, 129 So. 209.