Court Opinion

ID: 155742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 04:23:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:17.695139
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Tenth Circuit
                           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                  DEC 22 1997
                                      TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                             PATRICK FISHER
                                                                                        Clerk

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
           Plaintiff - Appellee,                               No. 97-2154
 v.                                                   (D.C. No. CV-96-519 JP/JHG)

 THOMAS TURNER,                                               (D. New Mex.)
           Defendant - Appellant.

                                   ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

       After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

       Appellant claims that his conviction was fundamentally defective because he was

allowed to plead guilty to conduct that was not a crime, in violation of his right to due

process. Mr. Turner appeals the district court’s denial of his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,

       *
        This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the district court’s dismissal of his

action.

          We grant Appellant’s motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or

fees, and we grant Appellant a certificate of appealability. We affirm the judgment for the

reasons given in the magistrate judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended

Disposition, as adopted and supplemented by the district court in its Order filed April 1,

1997.

          AFFIRMED.

                                                  Entered for the Court

                                                  Monroe G. McKay
                                                  Circuit Judge

                                              2