Court Opinion

ID: 9719819
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 08:05:34.543091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:10.312502
License: Public Domain

OPINION CONCURRING IN RESULT
Staton, P.J.
I concur in result. Allied made a prima facie case of conversion: (1) that it had exclusive rights of possion to the pullets; (2) it described the number of pullets in possession of Yoder under the contract; (3) Yoder’s exercise of dominion over the pullets in defiance of Allied’s right to possession; (4) that Yoder’s acts were unauthorized or tor-tious; (5) damages sustained resulting from Yoder’s acts. Yoder’s evidence failed to rebut these five basic elements necessary for a recovery in conversion.
Note. — Reported at 359 N.E.2d 602.