Court Opinion

ID: 9765340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 04:00:40.949856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:09.071312
License: Public Domain

Justice CASTILLE,
concur.
On the current pleadings, I agree with the denial of the Application for Reargument. However, I would allow Petitioner Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners (“PEDP”) the opportunity to amend the original filing in this matter to augment the record with additional and/or disputed facts that demonstrate that PEDP is in fact situated identically to the petitioners in HSP Gaming L.P. v. Council for the City of Philadelphia, 593 Pa. 358, 930 A.2d 1251 (2007). I would also retain jurisdiction.