Court Opinion

ID: 6337951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-05 14:00:40.60122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:09.209513
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-1039    Document: 58    Page: 1   Filed: 05/03/2022

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

                      SIPCO, LLC,
                        Appellant

                            v.

                EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.,
                         Appellee
                  ______________________

                   2021-1039, 2021-1040
                  ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-
 00545, IPR2019-00547.
                  ______________________

                       JUDGMENT
                  ______________________

     JASON E. STACH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar-
 rett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant.
 Also represented by BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN; JAMES R.
 BARNEY, CONSTANTINE GREGORY GRAMENOPOULOS, Wash-
 ington, DC.

    DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP,
 Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
 JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR.,
 DANIEL W. RICHARDS, East Palo Alto, CA.
Case: 21-1039     Document: 58   Page: 2    Filed: 05/03/2022

                   ______________________

 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

 ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

     PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and
 BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

          May 3, 2022            /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
            Date                 Peter R. Marksteiner
                                 Clerk of Court