Court Opinion

ID: 6519298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:29:36.581704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:06.439991
License: Public Domain

TYSON, J.-
— This is an appeal prosecuted by Borden I-I. Burr and others from a judgment discharging* one Foster upon a writ of habeas■ corpus sued out by him. It Avas made to appear by the petition of Foster that he Avas under arrest and being* restrained of his liberty by Burr and others, members of the Alabama National Guard, upon a charge preferred against him for certain alleged Affiliations of the military law of this State. A motion is made to dismiss this appeal. This motion is resisted upon the theory, that section 4314 of the Code confers the right of appeal upon the appellants. That section provides that any party aggrieved by the judgment on the trial of habeas corpus may appeal to this court. The offense attempted to be charged against Foster AAras one against- the laws of the State, punishable by fine or imprisonment, (Acts, 1898-99, p. 142) .- The appellants’ custody of him was- by .virtue of the authority conferred upon them as officers of this State under the provisions of the act above cited, and not by *43virtue of any contract or other personal relation between lxim and them. In short, their authority to arrest him and restrain him of his liberty, if it exists at all, is derived exclusively from the powers conferred by the act above referred to, and the exercise of it is dependent upon a charge being preferred against Foster for a violation of a State law. This being true, the only parties who could possibly be aggrieved by the judgment are Foster and the State of Alabama. To hold otherwise would permit a sheriff, where a prisoner is discharged on a writ of habeas corpus from his custody, to prosecute an appeal to this court — a matter in which he could not possibly have a personal interest, and in which the State alone is the aggrieved party.
Appeal dismissed.