Court Opinion

ID: 9832186
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:41:33.088281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:43.583409
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant seems to have construed our statement that the testimony as to the value of the mare was by no means conclusive as being the ground upon which we affirmed the judgment herein. An examination of our opinion herein will show that our decision is based upon the fact that appellee alleged in his petition that the value of the mortgaged property was $250. This being alleged, and the court having found that the allegation was made in good faith, and not for the fraudulent purpose of conferring jurisdiction, it is immaterial that the evidence upon the trial showed that such property was worth less than $200.
Motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.