Court Opinion

ID: 8026731
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:39:59.593277+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:50.672011
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE DALY
(dissenting):
I dissent.
I do not disagree that some of the matters raised by the petitioner may be premature. He may not be considered a prospective defendant. The transactional immunity may protect all of his rights from unlawful invasion. He may or may not have standing to object in his present posture. However, my problem arises from the fact that we are making a fact determination without a proper record. These facts should be determined by the district court upon a hearing before the district court. It would be my position that if the petitioner claims a violation of a constitutional right by a proper petition before the district court, he has standing to be heard and his complaint determined by that court. There s never any unnecessary delay in granting the right to be heard on any legitimate motion before any court in a judicial proceeding.