Court Opinion

ID: 8260586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 15:53:35.599484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:10.285018
License: Public Domain

Bond, J.
— This is an action of replevin for the possession of goods held by the sheriff under writs of .attachment against one J. A. Bilyeu. There was a *420trial before the court sitting as a jury and a verdict and judgment in favor of respondent, from which this appeal was taken.
The errors assigned are: First. The judgment is against the law. Second. It is against the evidence. Third. The instruction of the court is wrong. Fourth. The instruction'asked by appellant ought to have been given.
Appellant’s motion for a new trial is as follows:
“Comes now plaintiff and moves the court for a new trial of this cause, and states for reasons therefor that the court erred in not admitting proper evidence offered; and the court further erred in admitting improper evidence.”
This motion in terms excludes each of the four errors now assigned. They are not, therefore, reviewable on appeal. Ray v. Thompson, 26 Mo. App. 431-437; Klotz v. Perteet, 101 Mo. 215-217; McCord v. Railroad, 21 Mo. App. 96. Hence there is nothing before us for review.
The judgment herein is affirmed.
Judge Biggs concurs. Judge Rombaueb is absent.