Court Opinion

ID: 7033454
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 06:43:16.399769+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:11:03.131786
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
In this case there was a motion for a new trial; but the evidence-is not set out in the record. There is no bill of exceptions; nor does it appear that the rulings of the Court were excepted to in any mode known to the law. There is, therefore, no point of inquiry properly before us (1).
The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent. damages and costs.

 See Irwin v. Anthony, 8 Ind. R. 470; Jolly et al. v. The Terre Haute Bridge Co., post, and cases cited.