Court Opinion

ID: 996186
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:47:19.869578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.167768
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSE FERNANDO MERCEDES,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-95-39, CA-97-1564-AM)

Submitted:   August 13, 1998              Decided:   September 1, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Fernando Mercedes, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jose Fernando Mercedes seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Mercedes, No. CR-95-39

(E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 1998)   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2