Court Opinion

ID: 1011343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:26:09.405896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:28.114323
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6653

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REMEDIOS NARIO SOTO,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-97-291-2, CA-01-172-1)

Submitted:   August 14, 2003                 Decided:   August 21, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Remedios Nario Soto, Appellant Pro Se. Timika Shafeek, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Remedios Nario Soto seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).   We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Soto has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,   , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039

(2003).   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2