Court Opinion

ID: 4034677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-17 03:58:08.264353+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:45:08.472924
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-74,680-09

                      EX PARTE DOSHEE SWAN TOWERY, Applicant

                ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
              CAUSE NO. 07F0058-102-G IN THE 102ND DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM BOWIE COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Towery

v. State, 262 S.W.3d 586 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008).

        In a single ground, Applicant contends that he is actually innocent. This application,

however, presents a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed five

prior applications that have been dismissed under Article 11.07, § 4 of the Code of Criminal
                                                                                                   2

Procedure. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been

presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous

applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373
U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive

claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are

waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

       Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,

not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application

pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims

presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous

application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

       Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: September 14, 2016
Do not publish