Court Opinion

ID: 7425940
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:47:49.02982+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:24.435644
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of September 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
Petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.