Court Opinion

ID: 996068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:45:52.701044+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:56.485060
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6113

WILLIE THOMAS FORD,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

LONNIE SAUNDERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-269-R)

Submitted:   July 30, 1998                 Decided:   August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Thomas Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Ford v. Saunders, No. CA-97-269-R (W.D. Va.

Dec. 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2