Court Opinion

ID: 4399367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-22 18:00:18.271427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:45.121992
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-50745      Document: 00514967064         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/22/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 18-50745                            May 22, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

DANIEL FRAUSTO, also known as Daniel Rodriguez-Frausto, also known as
Rodriguez Frausto Daniel, also known as Daniel Rodriguez, also known as
Daniel Frausto-Rodriguez, also known as Daniel R. Frausto, also known as
Daniel Rodriguez Arzate,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:17-CR-147-1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Frausto has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Frausto has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-50745   Document: 00514967064   Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/22/2019

                              No. 18-50745

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                    2