Court Opinion

ID: 3957951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:18:50.049413+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:31.929923
License: Public Domain

The certificate of the district clerk upon which affirmance is asked shows that the judgment was rendered on the 13th day of October, 1892, and that appellant gave notice of appeal on the 15th day of November, 1892. It does not show that a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial was rendered. It discloses that the bond filed as an appeal bond is conditioned, "that appellant shall prosecute his appeal with effect, and shall pay all costs which have accrued in the court below, or which may accrue in the Court of Civil Appeals."
To give this court jurisdiction to affirm a case on certificate, the certificate of the clerk must show that an appeal was perfected. An appeal to this court is perfected by the appellant giving notice of appeal in open court within two days after final judgment overruling motion for new trial, and filing with the clerk an appeal bond. Art. 1387, p. 43, called sess. 22nd Leg. The condition of the bond provided is, "that appellant shall prosecute his appeal with effect, and shall pay all costs which have accrued in the court below and which may accrue in the Court of Civil Appeals and the Supreme Court (article 1400, page 44, called session Twenty-second Legislature), unless appellant desires to suspend the execution of the judgment, in which case the condition of the bond is prescribed in the succeeding article.
As the notice of appeal was not given within two days after final judgment, and the bond is not such as is provided, the appeal was not perfected to this court, and it has no jurisdiction to grant appellee's motion. *Page 178 
Wherefore the motion is overruled, and the certificate dismissed at appellee's costs.
Dismissed.