Court Opinion

ID: 5286255
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 08:38:40.846211+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:40.716409
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ryan Scott Nash (“Father”) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to A.S.N. (“child”). On appeal, Father argues the trial court erred in finding statutory grounds to terminate his parental rights, and the trial court abused its discretion in determining termination was in the best interest of the child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the trial *393court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).