Court Opinion

ID: 270088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:40:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:32:37.559625
License: Public Domain

354 F.2d 240
Richard JOHNSON, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19711.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 5, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Gus J. Solomon, Judge.
George Haslett, Jr., Portland, Or., for appellant.
Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Charles H. Habernigg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Norman Sepenuk, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was determined in the District Court adverse to appellant. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court's determination, and we affirm.

2
The above affirmance renders appellant's request for bail moot, and therefore the request for bail is dismissed.