Court Opinion

ID: 8464036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:12:00.661785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:11.967297
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Daniel Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 1:03-cr00023-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. April 14, 2009). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.