Court Opinion

ID: 1007081
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:20:19.720549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:57.561174
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7242

MICHAEL WILLIAM,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,        FCI   Petersburg,
Petersburg, Virginia,

                                                Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-01-869-AM)

Submitted:   February 12, 2002                Decided:   March 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael William, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael William appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See William v. Brooks, No. CA-01-869-AM (E.D. Va. filed

July 5, 2001; entered July 6, 2001).       We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2