Court Opinion

ID: 3297835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:15:03.953678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:49.453715
License: Public Domain

This appeal is identical, as to the questions involved, with the appeal in the case of Ferry v. O'Brien, ante, p. 629 [206 P. 449], and for the reasons set forth in said decision the judgment herein is affirmed.
Richards, J., pro tem., Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., Sloane, J., and Wilbur, J., concurred.
Shaw, C. J., being disqualified by relationship to plaintiff's attorney, did not participate.
  Rehearing denied. *Page 799
All the Justices concurred, except Shaw, C. J., who did not participate, owing to relationship to attorney for respondent.
Waste, J., was absent, and Richards, J., pro tem., was acting.