Court Opinion

ID: 9789617
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:39:15.635576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:23.513596
License: Public Domain

TONGUE, J.,
specially concurring.
I do not agree with the holding by the majority that the terms of the exclusion clause of this insurance policy are not ambiguous. Because, however, no contention was made by plaintiff that those terms are ambiguous, so as to raise a question of fact as to their meaning, as understood and intended by the parties, I concur in the result.1

 See Shadbolt v. Farmers Insur. Exch., 275 Or 407, 411, 551 P2d 478 (1976), and cases cited therein.