Court Opinion

ID: 1001720
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:59:50.397058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:40:27.294999
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7702

MICHAEL LEON HILL-BEY,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-415-AM)

Submitted:   May 25, 2000                   Decided:   June 2, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Leon Hill-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OF-
FICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Leon Hill-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.     See Hill-Bey v. Director,

Virginia Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-99-415-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 1,

1999).   We also deny Hill-Bey’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con-

tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2