Court Opinion

ID: 3166359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-12-30 16:09:26.122556+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:00:30.914024
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                             December 30, 2015
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
MYRTLE BLEVINS, WIDOW OF                                                      OF WEST VIRGINIA

SAMUEL F. BLEVINS,
Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 14-0857 (BOR Appeal No. 2049176)
                   (Claim No. 2012030225)

RESOURCES LIMITED, LLC,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
       Petitioner Myrtle Blevins, widow of Samuel F. Blevins, by J. Thomas Greene, her
attorney, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review.
Resources Limited, LLC, by H. Toney Stroud, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated August 1, 2014, in
which the Board affirmed a January 29, 2014, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s October 4, 2012,
decision denying dependent’s benefits. The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written
arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

        Mr. Blevins, an underground coal miner for Resources Limited, LLC, was exposed to
coal dust in underground mines for approximately eighteen years. Mr. Blevins applied for
benefits on March 2, 2012, and the claims administrator held the claim compensable on a
nonmedical basis for occupational pneumoconiosis. It found that Mr. Blevins was not entitled to
the presumption contained in West Virginia Code § 23-4-8c(b) (2009). Resources Limited, LLC,
introduced a November 12, 2009, record which shows that Mr. Blevins reported to Paul Chakola,
M.D., for a pulmonary consultation because of heavy smoking and possible emphysema. Dr.
                                                1
Chakola noted that Mr. Blevins had worked in coal mines for approximately eighteen years. The
impression was a history of increasing shortness of breath possibly related to chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. The impression of a pulmonary function test issued on November 20, 2009,
was severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The recommendations were to stop smoking
and begin bronchodilator therapy.

        On April 20, 2010, Mr. Blevins passed away. His death certificate stated that he was
sixty-two years old at the date of death and died of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis. Mr. Blevins’s
widow filed for dependent’s benefits and her case was referred to the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board. On July 31, 2012, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board found that
occupational pneumoconiosis did not cause or contribute to Mr. Blevins’s death in a material
degree. On October 4, 2012, the claims administrator denied dependent’s benefits based upon the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s findings. Mrs. Blevins protested.

       On December 5, 2012, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board was called to testify.
John Willis, M.D., the Board’s radiologist, reviewed images taken by the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board on September 21, 2000. He opined that the images showed no evidence
of occupational pneumoconiosis but did show some mild hyperinflation consistent with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. Jack Kinder, M.D., and Mahendra Patel, M.D., found that
occupational pneumoconiosis did not contribute in a material degree to Mr. Blevins’s death.
They noted that there was no x-ray diagnosis or clinical diagnosis of occupational
pneumoconiosis and the only diagnosis was made because of his history of working in a coal
mine. They noted that Mr. Blevins had a very long smoking history, up to fifty-pack years. Dr.
Kinder testified that he had no idea why the death certificate listed coal worker’s
pneumoconiosis as the cause of death because there was no information in the file to suggest it.
However, there was evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to smoking.

        The Office of Judges found that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially
contribute to Mr. Blevins’s death and affirmed the claims administrator’s denial of dependent’s
benefits. The Office of Judges concluded that the only evidence that Mr. Blevins suffered from
occupational pneumoconiosis was his medical history he gave to medical personnel that he
worked in the coal mines. The Office of Judges indicated that no reliable x-ray introduced into
the record revealed occupational pneumoconiosis. The Office of Judges found that even if he did
have occupational pneumoconiosis, he would have only had it to a very minimal degree. The
Office of Judges noted that he did have a significant history of cigarette smoking and
radiological findings consistent with smoking related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
Office of Judges also reiterated that the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board was firm in its
conviction that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to Mr. Blevins’s
death. The Board of Review adopted the findings of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order.

        We agree with the consistent decisions of the claims administrator, the Office of Judges,
and the Board of Review. Pursuant to Bradford v. Workers’ Compensation Commissioner, 185
W. Va. 434, 442, 408 S.E.2d 13, 21 (1991), the correct standard to determine dependent’s
benefits is “whether the injury or disease contributed in any material degree to the death.” The
only evidence that Mr. Blevins’s death was the result of occupational pneumoconiosis was the
                                                2
death certificate, his non-medical occupational pneumoconiosis claim, and his history of
eighteen years of underground coal mining. All of the other evidence points to the conclusion
that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to Mr. Blevins’s death. Mr.
Blevins’s lungs did not show evidence of occupational pneumoconiosis when examined.
Furthermore, Mr. Blevins did have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was consistent
with cigarette smoking. By the most liberal estimate, Mr. Blevins smoked a pack to a pack and a
half per day for forty-five to fifty years. In addition, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board
found that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute to his death. Because the
majority of the evidence showed that occupational pneumoconiosis did not materially contribute
to his death, the Office of Judges and Board of Review did not err for denying dependent’s
benefits.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

ISSUED: December 30, 2015

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

                                                3