Court Opinion

ID: 5229450
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:52:49.120009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:38.581586
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
We regard this money which the court has ordered to be paid as money paid into court to abide the result of an action to be brought; and that action having been brought and determined in favor of the defendant Rosa W. Straus, she is entitled, under the stipulation, to a return of the said money. If the money in question was not money paid into corut, the court would have no power by a summary order to direct its disposition. The provisions of rule 69 of the General Rules of Practice require that all orders directing the payment of money out of court shall direct the payment to be made to the person entitled to receive the same. Under this rule the moneymust be paidto’Rosa W. Straus, or to her attorney in fact. The order must, therefore, be modified by striking out the provision directing the money to be paid to her attorneys, and by further providing that this order is without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiffs or other creditors as against the defendant Rosa W. Straus. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.