Court Opinion

ID: 212513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-16 19:34:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:12.107955
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
  
   See United States v. Rufus,
  
  No. 3:02-cr-00550-MJP-1 (D.S.C. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.