Court Opinion

ID: 10702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 05:56:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:43.180205
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                      ____________________

                          No. 95-11065
                      ____________________

                      JOHN HALKIAS, ET AL.,

                                  Plaintiff,

                          JOHN HALKIAS,

                                   Plaintiff-Appellee,

                             versus

                  GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,

                                  Defendant-Appellant.

               ----------------------------------
                    JAMES ANTHONY CUREINGTON,

                                   Plaintiff,

                             versus

                  GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,

                                   Defendant-Appellant.

           __________________________________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                          ( 92-CV-860 )
           __________________________________________
                        October 22, 1996

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

     For this action under the WARN ACT, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq.,

General Dynamics appeals the denial of its FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c)

motion, claiming that this action is time-barred.   We affirm.   See

Staudt v. Glastron, 92 F.3d 312 (5th Cir. 1996).

                                                       AFFIRMED

     *
          Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.