Court Opinion

ID: 3123789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:44:50.539599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:23.705137
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00354-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
IN RE MICHELLE ARTEAGA

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Relator, Michelle Arteaga, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on July 8, 2010.  On July 13, 2010, the Court directed relator to file a transcript of any
relevant testimony, or a statement in lieu thereof, and requested that the real party in
interest, Jorge Arteaga, file a response to relator's petition for writ of mandamus on or
before the expiration of ten days. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2), 52.8(b).  Relator has now
filed a "Notice of Nonsuit" stating that she no longer wishes to prosecute this matter
because the parties have entered into a settlement agreement to transfer the underlying
case to Nueces County, Texas.

	The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and relator's "Notice of Nonsuit," is of the opinion that relator's motion to dismiss this
original proceeding should be and is GRANTED.  This cause is DISMISSED without
reference to the merits.  
	IT IS SO ORDERED.		
								PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
28th day of July, 2010.