Court Opinion

ID: 51706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:08:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:17.403610
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                  FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                            MARCH 30, 2007
                              No. 06-14935                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                      D. C. Docket No. 05-00033-CR-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

BILLY WAYNE CHENEY,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Georgia
                      _________________________

                             (March 30, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Hugh B. McNatt, appointed counsel for Billy Wayne Cheney in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because the

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cheney’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2