Court Opinion

ID: 9864385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 12:56:27.907613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:22.185481
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON REHEARING. Mehaffy, J. The facts are fully stated in the original opinion, and it is unnecessary to restate them. A majority of the court has reached the conclusion that the petition for rehearing should he overruled, but that the opinion should ihe modified. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the evidence as to the amount of revenue or income from the ferry was not competent testimony. Mr. Justice Humphreys and the writer do not agree in this opinion, but think that the amount of revenue or income is competent for the purpose of showing the market value of the property. But the court now holds that evidence of the amount of tolls or income from the ferry is inadmissible, and that the original opinion should be modified to this extent only. ■ After a very careful reexamination of the entire case, a majority of the Judges have reached the conclusion that the original opinion is correct, except as to the testimony of amount of tolls or revenue from the ferry, and the petition for rehearing is therefore denied.