Court Opinion

ID: 147026
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-05-24 19:23:39+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:24:03.105293
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  David Henry Rogers appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims of “malfeasance” and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the Veterans’ Administration and one of its officials. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Rogers v. Burke,
  
  No. 5:09-cv-00068-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.