Court Opinion

ID: 9607304
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 02:57:19.632272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:38.252988
License: Public Domain

On Respondents’ Petition for Rehearing
WARNER, J.
Petition for rehearing denied.
We avail ourselves of this opportunity to clarify *724a statement made in the original opinion which caused the petitioners some confusion. They refer to the sentence reading: “Because of the reciprocal character of their agreement, this would only apply to the property which came to the surviving spouse under the will.” Earlier in the original opinion we stated that the agreement made between Mr. Schomp and his wife was intended to include properties which they held by the entireties. We bring the foregoing quotation in harmony therewith by adding thereto the following: “including the real property previously owned by the entireties, if not previously disposed of by the surviving spouse.”