Court Opinion

ID: 9732751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 16:33:37.258067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:32.563951
License: Public Domain

YOUNG, Presiding Judge.
I dissent.
Wilson's Motion to Correct Errors and memorandum in support thereof, timely filed on October 25, 1985, stated that the "publication was not in accordance with Trial Rule 4.18." The trial court is charged with knowledge of Trial Rule 4.13 and its requirements. Likewise, the trial court is charged with the knowledge of its own record which, on its face, omits the required provision of Trial Rule 4.13(B)(6), namely:
(6) A clear statement that the person being sued must respond within thirty (80) days after the last notice of the action is published, and in case he fails to do so, judgment by default may be entered against him for the relief demanded in the complaint.
I would reverse and order a new trial.