Court Opinion

ID: 669329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:31:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:04.311401
License: Public Domain

23 F.3d 401NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Charlene RATCLIFFE, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer IV,Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-6229.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 21, 1994.Decided May 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-93-2281-JFM)
Steven M. Johnson, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Johnson v. Ratcliffe, No. CA-93-2281-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 16, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED