Court Opinion

ID: 990690
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:25:09.825464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:13:14.522276
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6748

PERRY SHIPPY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

D. HAROLD; D. MOSS; C. EVANS,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-96-307)

Submitted:   October 17, 1996             Decided:   October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L.
No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v.

Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2