Court Opinion

ID: 870773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-25 01:15:57.121305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:25.430167
License: Public Domain

LAW LTBRAF%Y

 

N0. 30429
:N THE sUPREME coURT or THE sTATE 0F HAwA;T
F“*~?
M:cHAEL c. TIERNEY, Petiti@n@r, §§
sr
vS. §§ %
{ ,
THE HoNoRABLE R1cHARD K. PERK1Ns, JUDGE or THE " r~
coURT or THE F:RsT cIRcU1T, sTATE or HAwAr:, R@_ §§ fn
__
oR:G1NAL PRocEED:NG §§
982 P.2d 334, 338 (l999) (A writ of mandamus is an

204,

extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
Therefore

obtain the requested action.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.
Honolulu, Hawafi, May 4, 20lO.

DATED:

PYow4nLY*7%MMUuj@J¥w

/e-~§

%v~a>f. *()W@@[ %\ l
mm ~’-‘- Ac¢z»¢¢/¢.M//M