Court Opinion

ID: 6556637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 18:59:10.856784+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:20.874494
License: Public Domain

Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
*502Chapter 250, ml. 29, Laws of Delaware, creates the court of common pleas for New Castle county. Being purely a statutory court, in the absence of an express provision, giving the right of appeal, its decisions would be final; but section 8 of the act creating it provides:
“From any order, ruling, decision or judgment of said court, the aggrieved party shall have the rights of appeal or certiorari, to the Superior Court of New Castle county, in the same manner as is now provided by law as to causes tried before justices of the peace.”
Sections 4035 and 4036, Rev. Code, 1915, provide for the manner of taking appeals from a justice of the peace to the Superior Court. They require the appellant to give security within a specified time and to enter a duly certified transcript of the docket entries of the justice in the office of the prothonotary of the Superior. Court of the county where the judgment was given, on or before the first day of the term next after the appeal. Rule 30 of the Superior Court Rules authorizes the filing of pro narrs. in the Superior Court in appeals from a justice of the peace; expressly providing, however, that they shall not be received in any other case.
The contention of the defendant is that, as this rule was in force at the time of the passage of the act creating the court of common pleas, one of the rights of appeal from that court to the Superior Court is the right to file a pro narr. in the Superior Court as in appeals from a justice of the peace.
It is manifest that section 8 of the Common Pleas Act was merely intended to provide for the right of appeal to the Superior Court and for the manner of exercising it, and that it had no reference to the procedure relating to the retrial of the case in the Superior Court. The trial of the appeal in the Superior Court is a trial de nova (Wigglesworth v. Brodsky et al., 7 Boyce, 586, 110 Atl., 46), and must therefore be governed by the same rules and practice that apply in the Superior Court. Rule 30 of the Superior Court Rules merely applies to the procedure in that court and has no bearing whatever on either the right of appeal from the *503court of common pleas or the manner of entering it in the Superior Court.
It follows that the declaration in this case should follow the common-law form and that a pro narr. is improper. The demurrer is, therefore, sustained.
Note:- — -After the decision of this case, Rule 30 of the Superior Court was amended to read as follows:
Rule 30. Pro narrs. shall not be received in any case, except in appeals from the court of common pleas for New Castle county and justices of the peace.