Court Opinion

ID: 4017249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-19 23:09:05.415616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:56.040033
License: Public Domain

ORDER
  

  PER CURIAM.
 

  AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
 

  Did not the trial court properly grant [P]etitioner’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial “delay,” and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [Petitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [Petitioner was brought to trial?