Court Opinion

ID: 5994505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:20:32.917766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:00.647237
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), rendered December 21, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.