Court Opinion

ID: 7535114
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:17:11.345062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:46.136791
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the evidence in the record in this contract action we cannot agree with appellants’ cogent argument that there was no jury issue as to whether duress was established as a defense. See Cooper v. Cooper, 69 So.2d 881 (Fla.1954); City of Miami v. Kory, 394 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Corporacion Peruana de Auropuertos y Aviacion Commercial v. Boy, 180 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). We do not find merit in appellants’ remaining contentions.
AFFIRMED.
RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.