Court Opinion

ID: 8454814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:13:59.133558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.930019
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Sparks appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sparks, No. 3:04-cr-00391-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.