Court Opinion

ID: 9592669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:16:11.061101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:15.499728
License: Public Domain

LANE, Judge,
concurs in results:
¶ 1 I agree with the opinion of the majority when it concludes that the phrase “with premeditated design” is the equivalent of “malice aforethought,” and therefore, its usage does not vitiate the Information. Coming to this conclusion, I would find the Information sufficient and that the use of the “Parker”1 doctrine is unnecessary.

. Parker v. State, 1996 OK CR 19, 917 P.2d 980, cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 777, 136 L.Ed.2d 721 (1997).