Court Opinion

ID: 9391578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-02 18:00:28.666416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:42.507430
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10820         Document: 00516734123             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/02/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10820
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                     May 2, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Gene Garcia Solis,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 5:21-CR-154-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gene Garcia
   Solis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Solis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10820     Document: 00516734123         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/02/2023

                                  No. 22-10820

   Solis’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
   Cir. R. 42.2.

                                           2