Court Opinion

ID: 9752865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 18:40:25.922567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:27:24.258684
License: Public Domain

LARSEN, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent and in support thereof would adopt the well-considered Superior Court opinion authored by Judge Montgomery in Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance Companies, 384 Pa.Super. 92, 557 A.2d 789 (1989). Additionally, I would find that the appellant is estopped from asserting the third-party beneficiary contract concept, *511which the majority adopts, because of appellant’s refusal to provide appellee with a copy of the policy. Appellee went to all of the trouble and expense of suing in Common Pleas Court solely because of appellant’s obstreperousness and mendacity.