Court Opinion

ID: 8427750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 03:59:07.012142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:33.249807
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Gonzalo Peralta Cuevas, a native and citizen of Mexico appearing pro se, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
Peralta has waived any challenge to the BIA’s order denying reconsideration by failing to address it in his opening brief to this court. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
To the extent Peralta seeks review of the BIA’s January 31, 2003 order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s decision that he was ineligible for cancellation of removal for lack of a qualifying relative, we lack jurisdiction to consider it, *442because the petition for review is not timely as to that order. See id. at 1258.
We do not consider Peralta’s contention that he had settled expectations of placement in suspension of deportation proceedings, see Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir.2002), because he failed to administratively exhaust this issue before the BIA, see Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.