Court Opinion

ID: 5570269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:10:48.227827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:44.101517
License: Public Domain

Fish, J.
Where a testator directly devised and bequeathed to two minor grandsons described realty and personalty ‘to be equal 1 y divided between ’ ’ them, and in his will directed that “i£ either of them should die without children or the descendants o£ children, then his part shall goto the survivor or his children or descendants of children, but if neither of them should leave any child or descendants of children, then said property” to revert to the testator’s estate; and where two named persons-were by'the will “appointed guardians and trustees of the property hereby bequeathed to” the grandsons, the will, however, not imposing-upon them any duties, the intention was to make these persons trustees of the estate which the grandsons took under the will, and the trust thus-created became executed on the arrival.of both grandsons at majority. This being so, the trustees so appointed were not necessary parties to an action subsequently instituted by one of the grandsons against the legali representative of the other, who had died, for the recovery of property, which the latter in his lifetime had received under this provision of the-will.
The court erred in dismissing the action for want of proper parties.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.