Court Opinion

ID: 6927488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 23:32:00.321939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:59.094930
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
The state appeals an order made prior to trial dismissing the charging instrument on the ground that the harassment statute, ORS 166.065(1)(a), upon which the charge is based, is unconstitutional. We have twice ruled to the contrary and decline to reconsider our holding now. See State v. Keller, 40 Or App 143, 594 P2d 1250 (1979); State v. Sallinger, 11 Or App 592, 504 P2d 1383 (1972).
Reversed and remanded for trial.