Court Opinion

ID: 240927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 08:32:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:24.070910
License: Public Domain

239 F.2d 384
57-1 USTC  P 9269
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United PacificInsurance Company, Appellees.
No. 16276.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1956.

A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.
Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.
Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F. Supp. 60.  For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is

2
Affirmed.