Court Opinion

ID: 9884015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 02:31:04.55567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:34.351881
License: Public Domain

SABERS, Justice
dissenting.
[¶ 16.] The majority has not answered that portion of question TWO relating to the “How” or “Means” the Governor must use for delivery. In fact, ¶ 13 of the opinion provides “there is no necessity for such delivery.” In this respect, I would simply advise that the “means” includes all appropriate delivery, including electronic, facsimile transmission and the more customary or traditional means of delivery.
[¶ 17.] It is obvious that the Legislature can not shorten the Governor’s time frame for delivery or service by their actions or inactions. Accordingly, all other questions need not be addressed or answered at this time. In fact, it could be hazardous to do so in view of the fact that it is impossible to envision all possible scenarios that could arise with regard to the return of vetoed bills.
Richard W. Sabers Justice Richard W. Sabers