Court Opinion

ID: 5612255
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:05:11.935759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:08.642845
License: Public Domain

Jenkins, P. J.
There were sufficient facts, necessarily within the knowledge of the trial judge, to have justified the reinstatement of the claim of the defendant in error, and no abuse of discretion appears. See Maddox Coffee Co. v. McHan, 22 Ga. App. 198 (2) (95 S. E. 736).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Levy and claim—motion to reinstate claim; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. August 1, 1919.
A. R, Wright, for plaintiff.
M. L. Gross, contra.