Court Opinion

ID: 7340818
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 23:51:25.266154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:15.763338
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs were lessees of a certain store, under covenant not to assign the lease. They executed and delivered to defendant an instrument which purported to sublet “for the balance of the term” all “with the exception of a space of 10 by 10 feet in the rear of said store.” This was an assignment pro tanto as between them and the original landlord, and gave the latter a right of action against the assignee for the rent. Woodhull v. Rosenthal, 61 N. Y. 382; Stewart v. Long Island R. R. Co., 102 N. Y. 601, 607-609, 8 N. E. 200, 55 Am. Rep. 844. The landlord having demanded the rent of defendant, the latter paid it, and thus has a defense to the present action, which is brought by plaintiffs for the same rent.
. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.