Court Opinion

ID: 9829648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:30:23.695265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:03.824245
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In his motion for rehearing appellant raises the fundamental point that, because the city charter did not provide for notice to the property owners of the intention to make the special assessment in question, the assessment proceeding thereunder was void. It is conceded that appellant had notice of the proceeding, and was given ample opportunity to come in and contest the assessment before" it was made. Aside from the academic question presented, we conclude that the point raised must be overruled, since appellant had actual notice and an opportunity to be heard in objection to the assessment before it was made. We adhere to the original decision, and with this additional holding overrule the motion for rehearing.