Court Opinion

ID: 5462191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:39:55.396166+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:55.884312
License: Public Domain

Talcott, J.,
also concurred, except as to the rule of damages suggested in the above opinion. In regard to that, his opinion was, that damages should have been estimated upon the basis of the redemption of the mortgaged premises, by the plaintiff’s assignor, from the incumbrance of the prior mortgages, and the plaintiff allowed, by way of damages, what was necessarily paid by his assignor, to remove prior incumbrances, and make her mortgage the first lien, as it was represented, and interest thereon.
Judgment affirmed.
Mullin, P. J., and Johnson and Talcott, Justices.]