Court Opinion

ID: 5534900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:18:32.468173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:40.577008
License: Public Domain

*923OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Division exercises the same discretion as does Special Term and may modify a Special Term order in the exercise of discretion even though it cannot be said that Special Term abused its discretion (Matter of Attorney-General of State of N. Y. v Katz, 55 NY2d 1015, 1017). Here, however, the Appellate Division’s modification was on the law. Because the Special Term order was not an abuse of discretion as a matter of law, there must be a reversal of the Appellate Division order and a remittal to that body for its further consideration on the facts and in the exercise of discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.