Court Opinion

ID: 2920478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 01:24:06.394653+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:58.705719
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-02-102-CV
 
                             COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                   THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                                CORPUS
CHRISTI
________________________________________________________________
 
PEOPLE=S B.H.W., INC. AND FRANK R. BOCHICCHIO,            Appellants,
 
                                                   v.
 
KIMBERLY L. ERWIN, ET AL.,                                                Appellees.
________________________________________________________________
 
                         On
appeal from the 28th District Court 
                                  of Nueces County, Texas
________________________________________________________________
 
                                   O
P I N I O N
 
                    Before
Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Castillo
                                       Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellants, PEOPLE=S B.H.W., INC. AND FRANK R. BOCHICCHIO, attempted to perfect
an appeal from an order of dismissal entered by the 28th
District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 99-2444-A.  The order of
dismissal in this cause was signed on August 16, 2001.  A timely motion for reconsideration was filed
on August 27, 2001.  Pursuant to Tex. R.
App. P. 26.1, appellants= notice of appeal was due on November
14, 2001, but was not filed until December 31, 2001.  
Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to
correct the defect, if it could be done. 
Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten
days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  Appellants= response to this
Court=s notice was received
on March 7, 2002.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellants= failure to timely
perfect their appeal, and appellants= response to this
Court=s notice, is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
 
Do not publish.
Tex.
R. App. P.
47.3.
Opinion delivered and
filed this
the 16th
day of May, 2002.