Court Opinion

ID: 3185564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-03-15 16:27:52.41272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:01.589326
License: Public Domain

People v Morgenshtern (2016 NY Slip Op 01761)

People v Morgenshtern

2016 NY Slip Op 01761

Decided on March 15, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 15, 2016

Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, JJ.

484 400/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
vDavid Morgenshtern, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered May 30, 2012,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 15, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.