Court Opinion

ID: 8449338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:29:55.967711+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.133768
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Edward Jones appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the motion because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not result *205in a change to the Guidelines sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.