Court Opinion

ID: 9935093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:55:19.615524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:04.443685
License: Public Domain

I concur in the reversal of this case; however, I would reverse on the basis that the facts here do not meet the standards set out in Bayliss. Also, as Justice Almon wrote in a "concurring in the result" opinion in Ex parte Barnard,581 So.2d 489, 489 (Ala. 1991), concerning the problems with theBayliss decision that
 "[o]ther inherent problems include the questions of how good a student a child has to be in order to be entitled to support under Bayliss; whether a child should be awarded support to attend a trade or technical school; whether such support can be awarded for post-graduate or professional studies; and at what age the parent's obligation terminates."
This seems to be one of those cases.