Court Opinion

ID: 4268162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-24 00:08:34.728733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:18:04.232435
License: Public Domain

State of Vermont
                                Superior Court—Environmental Division

==========================================================================
                    ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
==========================================================================

In re Losier Variance Application                                            Docket No. 79-4-08 Vtec
(Appeal from ZBA decision)

Title: Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filing No. 9)
Filed: April 6, 2011
Filed By: William P. Neylon, Attorney for Appellee Town of Maidstone
Response in Opposition filed on 5/9/11 by Oliver L. Twombly, Attorney for Appellants/Applicants John
and Paulette Losier

  __ Granted                       _X_ Denied                        ___ Other

        For the same reasons as those contained in our Entry Oder issued today denying the Town of
Maidstone’s (“Town”) motion to enforce judgment, we also DENY the Town’s motion for a preliminary
injunction to prevent John and Paulette Losier from using their property at 44 Private West 7 in
Maidstone, Vermont. There is no pending matter before the Court in regards to which the issuance of an
injunction would be proper.

_________________________________________              August 1, 2011_ _____
       Thomas S. Durkin, Judge                            Date
===========================================================================
Date copies sent to: ____________                                            Clerk's Initials _______
Copies sent to:
  Oliver L. Twombly, Attorney for Appellants/Applicants John and Paulette Losier
  William P. Neylon, Attorney for Appellee Town of Maidstone
  Interested Person Brenda J. Tilton
  Interested Person Norman A. Vashaw