Court Opinion

ID: 9947025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-01 21:01:27.117425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:46.085201
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1370      Doc: 12         Filed: 02/29/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1370

        ERIC GOUDY, II,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00339-LMB-LRV)

        Submitted: February 27, 2024                                 Decided: February 29, 2024

        Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Eric Goudy, II, Appellant Pro Se. David M. Gettings, TROUTMAN PEPPER
        HAMILTON SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1370      Doc: 12         Filed: 02/29/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Eric Goudy, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as

        frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, affirm the district court’s order. Goudy v. Navy Fed. Credit

        Union, No. 1:23-cv-00339-LMB-LRV (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2023). However, we modify the

        district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. See Thomas v.

        Salvation Army S. Territory, 841 F.3d 632, 642 (4th Cir. 2016). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

                                                    2