Court Opinion

ID: 9902080
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-22 21:00:51.007156+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:45.096571
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1743      Doc: 16         Filed: 11/21/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1743

        BRIDGETTE WILLIAMS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.,

                            Defendant - Appellee,

                     and

        AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.,

                            Defendant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:21-cv-01918-MGL)

        Submitted: November 16, 2023                                Decided: November 21, 2023

        Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Bridgette Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William Lee Duda, Sarah M. Gable, OGLETREE
        DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1743      Doc: 16         Filed: 11/21/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Bridgette Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate

        judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant summary judgment on Williams’ race

        discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought

        pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Williams v. Piedmont Airlines, Inc., No.

        3:21-cv-01918-MGL (D.S.C. June 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the

        facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2