Court Opinion

ID: 6586767
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:45:05.261776+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:57:30.286677
License: Public Domain

Haselton, J.
This is an action of trover in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the value of ten shares of the capital stock of the G-ranite Savings Bank & Trust Company; the plaintiff’s claim being that the defendant had illegally converted the stock to his own use. The case was heard on an agreed statement of facts and judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted.
One Lydia A. Nye died in 1897, leaving a will by which her husband, Warren C. Nye, was named as executor. He was duly appointed, and he qualified as such. By the will Mrs. Nye made various bequests, and gave her husband the use and income of twenty-five hundred ($2500) dollars during his life, the remainder to one Ethel May Strong if she outlived Warren. *409Warren died in 1914, and Ethel May is now living. The plaintiff is administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of the testator Lydia A. Noyes, and brings suit as such.
The ten shares of stock were a part of the estate of Lydia A., bnt were not specifically bequeathed, nor were they in any way mentioned in the will. The husband, Warren, was made residuary legatee under the will. Warren inventoried the stock, together with other property of the estate, and, March 24, 1898, after due notice and without objection his account was examined and allowed by the probate court.
In the accounting he as executor was charged with the personal estate as per the inventory and given proper credits, and the balance being somewhat in excess of twenty-five hundred ($2500) dollars, that gross sum was reserved that the income might be received by Warren during his life, and that at his death the principal might be paid over according to the terms of the will. A few months after this settlement of his account, Warren C. Nye, as executor, transferred to Warren C. Nye the stock in question, which has been charged to him as executor in the accounting, and in 1901 he sold it, at its fair market value, to the Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Company. This institution, it is agreed, was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
In 1904, the defendant purchased the stock from the Montpelier' bank and paid therefor its fair market value. ITe was then treasurer of the Granite Savings Bank & Trust Company and had been since 1901, but had no actual notice of the previous ownership of the shares of stock. Nor did his position as treasurer charge him with constructive notice of transfers prior to the time when he became treasurer so as to make his situation in respect to the stock different from that of the Montpelier bank from which he purchased it.
The irregularity in this whole business was in the transfer of the stock from the executor to himself in 1898. But this irregularity or impropriety did not make the transfer void. At most it was only voidable. Sowles v. Lewis, 75 Vt. 59, 73, 74, 56 Atl. 282; Thomas v. Graves, 89 Vt. 339, 344, 95 Atl. 643. This action is brought, not to avoid the apparently irregular transfer, but to recover in trover for the value of the stock and as such action necessarily goes upon the ground of a void transfer it must fail. What, if any, right there may be to have the transfer avoided. *410we regard it as improper, or at least inadvisable, herein to discuss.

Judgment affirmed.