Court Opinion

ID: 2751896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-14 22:02:57.423738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:51.057366
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 42123

STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 808
                                                 )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: November 7, 2014
                                                 )
v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                 )
ERNEST ALEXANDER BERCIER, JR.,                   )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                 )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                      )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                 )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Bannock County. Hon. David C. Nye, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum
       period of confinement of four years, for felony driving under the influence of
       alcohol, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy
       Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                     Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
                                 and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Ernest Alexander Bercier, Jr. was convicted of felony driving under the influence of
alcohol, Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18-8005(9). The district court sentenced Bercier to a unified
term of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years. Bercier appeals,
contending that his sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.

                                                1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Bercier’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2