Court Opinion

ID: 4505041
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-02-06 10:11:44.312485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:13.483948
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                        San Antonio, Texas
                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                           No. 04-19-00791-CR

                                           Victor BARCENAS,
                                                Appellant

                                                      v.

                                           The STATE of Texas,
                                                 Appellee

                      From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                    Trial Court No. 2019CR5575
                            Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:           Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
                   Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                   Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2020

DISMISSED

           The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this criminal case, “is a plea-bargain

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The certification further states, “[T]he defendant

has waived the right of appeal.”

           Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

           In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo

contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor

and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:
                                                                                       04-19-00791-CR

       (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,

       (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or

       (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes

the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written

motion filed and ruled upon before trial, nor does it indicate the trial court gave its permission to

appeal. See id. Appellant has not identified with this court any statute that expressly authorizes

the specific appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect

that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal.

       We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of

appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We issued an order stating

this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification was made part of the

appellate record by January 3, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).

No such amended trial court certification has been filed.

       Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

                                                   PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                 -2-