Court Opinion

ID: 2280533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:58:15.579089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:34:48.795021
License: Public Domain

329 S.W.3d 408 (2011)
Michael B. WHITAKER, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94369.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
January 11, 2011.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Michael B. Whitaker, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).