Court Opinion

ID: 6732939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:14:45.437978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:41.249461
License: Public Domain

VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant contends and the State concedes that at the time of this offense, the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle under former G.S. 20-105 was not a lesser included offense of felonious larceny. We agree.
Since the offense was committed before 1 January 1975, an indictment for larceny will not support a conviction for the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle in violation of G.S. 20-105 [repeal effective 1 January 1975]. State v. Stinnett, 203 N.C. 829, 167 S.E. 63; State v. McCrary, 263 N.C. 490, 139 S.E. 2d 739; State v. Campbell, 14 N.C. App. 633, 188 S.E. 2d 754.
The court instructed the jury:
“ ... if you return a verdict of not guilty of felonious larceny, you would consider whether or not the defendant is guilty of the unlawful taking of a vehicle which is a lesser included offense within the charge of larceny which I referred to.” (Emphasis added.)
The instruction is erroneous.
On 1 January 1975, G.S. 14-72.2 entitled “Unauthorized use of a conveyance” became effective. Subsection (d) expressly provides that, an offense under G.S. 14-72.2 may be treated as a“lesser-included offense of the offense of larceny of a conveyance.” Defendant in this case was charged with an offense that was alleged to have occurred in October, 1974.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded.
Vacated and remanded.
Judges Martin and Clark concur.