Court Opinion

ID: 9544374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:55:09.39823+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:12:53.884447
License: Public Domain

Schroeder, J.,
dissenting: I must respectfully dissent. It is utter nonsense to say the interveners were adequately represented in this case until after judgment and after a motion for a new trial had been filed, when they first moved to intervene. Their application to intervene was not timely made and the trial court’s determination on this matter should not be reversed. My views are expressed in considerable detail in my dissenting opinion in Moyer v. Board of County Commissioners, 197 Kan. 23, 415 P. 2d 261, at page 31 in the official report, where the situation was substantially the samé as here.