Court Opinion

ID: 998586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:13:20.395236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:18.427503
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7605

CLINTES EVONNZO PERSON,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CARO-
LINA; HARRY CHAMBERS,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-98-156-1)

Submitted:   April 29, 1999                    Decided:   May 7, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clintes Evonnzo Person, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Clintes Evonzo Person seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Person v. Attorney Gener-

al of North Carolina, No. CA-98-156-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1998).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2