Court Opinion

ID: 9387778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-18 22:03:14.896454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:15.471577
License: Public Domain

Electronically Filed
                                                        Supreme Court
                                                        SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                        18-APR-2023
                                                        11:02 AM
                                                        Dkt. 25 ORD

                           SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
_______________________________________________________________
    ESTATE OF VIVIAN T. LORD, by her PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
    WILLIAM H. GILLIAM; and WILLIAM H. GILLIAM individually,
               Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,
                                 vs.
                  LESLIE KOBATA, REGISTRAR, in his
   official capacity only; PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA & CHOW, LLP;
          PORTER McGUIRE KIAKONA, LLP; FOREST B. JENKINS;
 CHONG, NISHIMOTO, SIA, NAKAMURA & GOYA, LLLP; JEFFREY H.K. SIA;
     DOROTHY P.H. MEISNER; SHANA MAGUIRE; HAWAII FIRST, INC.;
       CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA, HAWAII; and
    ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KUHIO SHORES AT POIPU,
                 Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
___________________________________________________________
         CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
           (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
                                ORDER
          (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,
    Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Nakayama, J., recused,
      and Circuit Judge Souza, in place of Wilson, J., recused)

            Upon consideration of the document filed on February

21, 2023, it is ordered:

            1.   The application for a writ of certiorari is

rejected.
          2.    The petition for a writ of mandamus or

prohibition is denied.   Petitioners have alternative means to

seek relief because 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX is ongoing and the vexatious

litigant order and order addressing attorney fees and costs may

be reviewed on appeal.   Petitioners have also not demonstrated a

clear and indisputable right to relief because it is within the

circuit court’s jurisdiction and discretion to decide the motion

for attorney fees and costs.   An extraordinary writ is thus not

warranted.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d

334, 338-39 (1999); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw.

237, 241–42, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978).

          3.    The request for a stay is denied.   If and when

appropriate, Petitioners may seek a stay in the circuit court

pursuant to Hawaiʻi Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 62 and Hawaiʻi

Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 8.

          DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 18, 2023.

                               /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

                               /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

                               /s/ Todd W. Eddins

                               /s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

                               /s/ Kevin A.K. Souza

                                 2