Court Opinion

ID: 994857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:28:56.720028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:22.135692
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-2732

DARRELL R. LOTT,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES ARMY,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-97-536)

Submitted:   April 16, 1998                 Decided:   April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell R. Lott, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel-

lee's motion to dismiss in his civil action. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court and deny Appellee's motions to strike. Lott v. United States
Army, No. CA-97-536 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2