Court Opinion

ID: 7273553
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:32:27.951631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:47.752074
License: Public Domain

CCA 20140785. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues raised by Appellant:
I.WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY FAILING TO ADMIT CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED EVIDENCE UNDER MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 412(b)(1)(C).
II.WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN HE FAILED TO INSTRUCT THE PANEL ON THE MENS REA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE I, WHICH INVOLVED AN ARTICLE 92, UCMJ, VIOLATION OF ARMY REGULATION 600-20.
And the following issue specified by the Court:
III.WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THAT APPELLANT KNEW OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT SPC VM WAS TOO INTOXICATED TO CONSENT TO A SEXUAL ACT.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.