Court Opinion

ID: 1019450
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:35:46.929124+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:48.114470
License: Public Domain

*217
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s sealed January 31, 2006, order denying his sealed motion dated December 21, 2005. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
  
   United States v. Burton,
  
  No. 7:00-CR-105-1-F (E.D.N.C., Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED