Court Opinion

ID: 2902620
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 19:15:10.633361+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:37:09.429080
License: Public Domain

Becker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

EVERETT JOHNSON,

                                    Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                    Appellee. 

§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§

§

No. 08-06-00284-CR

Appeal from
 292nd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # F-05-52605-V)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Everett Johnson appeals a judgment revoking community supervision.  Appellant previously
entered a negotiated plea of guilty and was convicted of robbery.  Pursuant to the plea bargain, the
trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for ten years, probated for five years, and a fine of
$2,500.  Based on Appellant's plea of true to a motion to revoke, the trial court revoked the
community supervision order and imposed the original sentence of imprisonment for ten years.  We
affirm.
	Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d
1377, 87 S. Ct. 2094 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why,
in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). 
A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief, and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.  The judgment is affirmed.

June 21, 2007						 
							ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)