Court Opinion

ID: 9914266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-29 21:00:47.563538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:11:03.300597
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1063      Doc: 24         Filed: 12/28/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1063

        JACQUELINE TORREZ-FRANCO,

                            Petitioner,

                     v.

        MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General,

                            Respondent.

        On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

        Submitted: October 31, 2023                                 Decided: December 28, 2023

        Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Nash Fayad, FAYAD LAW, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian
        Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Song Park, Senior Litigation
        Counsel, Allison Frayer, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED
        STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1063         Doc: 24      Filed: 12/28/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Jacqueline Torrez-Franco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review

        of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the

        Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

        protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and

        Torrez-Franco’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary

        to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that

        substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478,

        481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Torrez-Franco (B.I.A.

        Dec. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

        are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                              PETITION DENIED

                                                     2