Court Opinion

ID: 994143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:18:23.039557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:56.492130
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTONIO SIVAL CAMPBELL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-30-A, CA-97-690-AM)

Submitted:   January 22, 1998             Decided:   February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Sival Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson,
III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Campbell, Nos. CR-90-30-A; CA-97-690-AM
(E.D. Va. July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2