Court Opinion

ID: 617349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-11-17 20:40:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:40.880646
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Michael T. Stephens appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), (d) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
  
   Stephens v. Kubic,
  
  No. 4:08-cv-00329-CMC (D.S.C. May 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.