Court Opinion

ID: 9635283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 13:45:16.458022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:09:23.040366
License: Public Domain

LARSEN, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent, and for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion filed this day in Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co., *531514 Pa. 517, 526 A.2d 323 (1987), and on the basis of the Superior Court opinion herein, I would affirm the Superior Court Order affirming in part and vacating in part the order of summary judgment entered in favor of appellants.
On remand, I would permit appellee, Edith Symbula, Administratrix, the right to amend her complaint to allege facts supporting her claim of delayed accrual, including the time and manner of discovery of the cause of her husband’s death and the circumstances excusing delayed discovery.
PAPADAKOS, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.