Court Opinion

ID: 5716981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:03:51.814973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:37.961390
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), entered on or about July 15, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly assessed 15 points for drug abuse, since defendant’s possession of crack cocaine immediately after his discharge from parole supervision, when he was no longer facing drug testing, and less than two years before his reclassification hearing, was not excessively remote (see People v Wilkens, 33 AD3d 399 [2006]). The court properly concluded that defendant’s present circumstances did not warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guarman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Defendant’s challenge to the choice of risk factors made by the Legislature and the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders is unavailing (see People v Bligen, 33 AD3d 489 [2006]; People v Joe, 26 AD3d 300 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 703 [2006]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.