Court Opinion

ID: 9365815
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-25 07:11:14.39553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:47.739993
License: Public Domain

Order entered January 18, 2023

                                 In The
                          Court of Appeals
                   Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

                           No. 05-21-00242-CV

        IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.M. AND M.A.M., CHILDREN

             On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court
                          Collin County, Texas
                 Trial Court Cause No. 366-53554-2020

                           No. 05-21-00373-CV

        IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.M. AND M.A.M., CHILDREN

             On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court
                          Collin County, Texas
                 Trial Court Cause No. 366-50778-2021

                           No. 05-21-00360-CV

                  MOLLY L. WILKERSON, Appellant

                                   V.

                    MARK MALDONADO, Appellee

             On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court
                          Collin County, Texas
                 Trial Court Cause No. 366-51795-2021
                                               No. 05-22-00216-CR

                             MOLLY LOUISE WILKERSON, Appellant

                                                            V.

                                    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                         On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3
                                      Dallas County, Texas
                               Trial Court Cause No. F-2145223-J

                                                   ORDER
                                          Before the Court En Banc1

             Before the Court is appellant’s January 9, 2023 letter which we treat as a

    motion to recuse Justice Emily Miskel. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

                                                                   /s/      ROBERT D. BURNS, III
                                                                            CHIEF JUSTICE

1
    After Justice Miskel declined to recuse herself, the motion was certified to and decided by the remaining justices en
    banc. See TEX. R. APP. P. 16.3(B).