Court Opinion

ID: 9733702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:14:39.927516+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:27:35.351151
License: Public Domain

SHOEMAKER, P. J.
I concur in the judgment. My disagreement is particularly directed to the portion of the opinion which holds the stipulation dated September 23, 1958 shows an intent on the part of respondents to submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the court. In my opinion, such construction entirely ignores the language of the agreement wherein respondents preserved their right to “appear, plead or otherwise move. ’ ’
In my view, the trial judge’s determination that this stipulation did not constitute an appearance or waiver was correct and being a reasonable construction of the document, is to be sustained by this court.
A petition for a rehearing was denied February 17, 1965, and respondents’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 24, 1965.