Court Opinion

ID: 2782204
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-25 22:05:21.80322+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:01:54.439630
License: Public Domain

Matter of Walker v Camacho (2015 NY Slip Op 01652)

Matter of Walker v Camacho

2015 NY Slip Op 01652

Decided on February 25, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 25, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
L. PRISCILLA HALL
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

2013-03274	DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Tasheen Walker, petitioner,
vFernando Camacho, etc., et al, respondents.

Tasheen Walker, East Elmhurst, N.Y., petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for respondents Fernando Camacho and Barry Kron, incorrectly sued herein as Barry Krome.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Laura T. Ross of counsel), respondent pro se.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the prosecution of the petitioner in a criminal action entitled People v Walker , commenced in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 1245/12, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348, 352).
The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
SKELOS, J.P., BALKIN, HALL and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court