Court Opinion

ID: 8071293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:28:27.13615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:14.846230
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from recites that it was made upon a to a new exceptions taken on behalf of the defendant at the trial, and because the verdict is contrary to the evidence and contrary to the law and is-for excessive damages,” and it is impossible to say upon what precise ground the court acted. It is apparent, however, from the cases cited by the learned justice in his brief memorandum, from his rulings upon the trial, and his charge with reference to the question of contributory negligence, that he was of the opinion that the negligence of the driver, if any, was imputable to the helper, plaintiff herein, who was in the rear of the wagon at the time of the accident, and that he did not set aside the verdict as having been against the weight of evidence. It is settled that the negligence of the driver is not imputable to the plaintiff. Waters v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company (Sup.) 85 N. Y. Supp. 1120. Whether or not the helper was negligent and the defendant free from negligence were questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury, and' their verdict should not have been disturbed.
Order reversed, with costs.