Court Opinion

ID: 9421713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 22:59:28.854427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:31.740839
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan
dissent in the above cases.* The matters referred to by the Court were not presented in the Court of Appeals and are not presented by these petitions. Agreeing with the Solicitor General that denial of the petitions for writs of certiorari would not foreclose appropriate consideration thereof by the Court of Appeals, we see no reason for vacating the Court of Appeals’ judgments and, therefore, dissent from this disposition of the matter by the Court.

[Note: This dissent applies also to No. 242, WIRL Television Corp. v. United States et al., post, p. 51.]