Court Opinion

ID: 9857603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 15:48:00.208132+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:51:46.617810
License: Public Domain

On Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing
In his motion for rehearing appellee states that the statement in our original opinion referring to the glass doors and the panels in question that
“they were open and obvious, and readily discernible to anyone, and not concealed in any manner”
is in direct conflict with the evidence in the case.
*748Attached hereto is a photographic representation of the, door and glass panels in question. We think that this photograph supports our statement that the doors and panels were open and obvious and readily discernible to anyone, and not concealed in any manner. We think the statement in our original opinion of which appellee complains is not only warranted, but compelled by the evidence.
Appellee’s motion for rehearing is overruled.