Court Opinion

ID: 995762
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:41:40.502884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:00.674578
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, a/k/a Angel,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District
Judge. (CR-93-26-F, CA-97-85-7-F)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                  Decided:   July 27, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay Stephen Neisen, ZIMMER & ZIMMER, Wilmington, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States At-
torney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   United   States   v.   Perez,   Nos.   CR-93-26-F;   CA-97-85-7-F

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                 DISMISSED

                                     2