Court Opinion

ID: 9800273
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 08:10:23.261657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:09.662760
License: Public Domain

*948BEAM, Circuit Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur in Parts I, II, IIA and III. The issues arising from the contracts at work in this dispute are continuing evidence of the country’s unforeseen and unfortunate economic turndown commencing in or about 2006 or 2007. There has been, as a result, a clearly disproportionate forfeiture suffered by enXco, possibly aided and abetted by NSP as it saw an obvious need to abandon this unneeded project. In my view, however, such a consequence is insufficient to allow enXco to overcome the force and effect of the “condition precedent” in dispute as contractually agreed upon by the parties.