Court Opinion

ID: 8029373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:00:13.123454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:55.033945
License: Public Domain

On February 22, 2002, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Criminal Endangerment, a felony. The defendant was deemed ineligible for parole throughout the term of the sentence.
On July 18, 2002, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Mark Sullivan. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless itis deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
*33The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 18th day of July, 2002.
DATED this 12th day of August, 2002.
Chairman, Hon. David Cybulski; Member, Hon. Marc Buyske and Alternate Member Hon. John W. Whelan.