Court Opinion

ID: 9324479
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-12 00:13:38.949991+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:55.061837
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                       NO. WR-94,099-01

                  EX PARTE RAYMOND LADANIEL JAMES, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 1071604-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM HARRIS COUNTY

       Per curiam. NEWELL, J. concurred.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.          James v. State, No. 14-07-00274-CR (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist] Mar. 6, 2008)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       This habeas application was filed in the trial court on October 8, 2012. A timely order

designating issues was signed on October 30, 2012. No further action was taken by the county until

the application was forwarded to this Court and received in August 2022. There is no indication as

to why this application was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or
                                                                                                         2

the trial court.

        Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his

conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary

review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why no action was

taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the order designating issues and the

forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant

as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and shall include that response in the

supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a response from Applicant, the trial

court shall detail the efforts that were made to obtain a response from Applicant. The trial court shall

then return the application to this Court.

        If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, the trial court shall order

appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use

any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of

counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
                                                                                                       3

counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to

file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant

would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 7, 2022
Do not publish