Court Opinion

ID: 9454399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 18:45:53.324824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:34:06.526599
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of appellee’s Petition for Rehearing, En Bane, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED by the Court, En Banc, that appellee’s aforesaid petition is denied.
Circuit Judges DANAHER, BURGER and TAMM would grant appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc.
A separate statement of Circuit Judge MeGOWAN, concurred in by Circuit Judges LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, as to why he voted against rehearing en banc is attached.
A separate statement of Circuit Judge WRIGHT as to why he voted against rehearing en banc is attached.
*1222A separate statement of Circuit Judge DANAHER as to why he voted for rehearing en banc is attached.
A separate statement of Circuit Judge BURGER as to why he voted for rehearing en banc is attached.
Separate Statement of Circuit Judge Mc-GOWAN, concurred in by Circuit Judges LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, on Votes to Deny Rehearing En Banc