Court Opinion

ID: 2790734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-04-01 19:05:21.823112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:10:43.204094
License: Public Domain

People v Minnerly (2015 NY Slip Op 02789)

People v Minnerly

2015 NY Slip Op 02789

Decided on April 1, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 1, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
L. PRISCILLA HALL
ROBERT J. MILLER
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2013-06845
2013-06846

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vTimothy Minnerly, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 3147/09, 979/10)

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Ferdinand Suba, Jr., on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), both imposed October 24, 2012, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, HALL, MILLER and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court