Court Opinion

ID: 9406574
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-01 10:11:45.328698+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:31.509471
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00158-CV

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                          TYLER, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE                             §       APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY
PROTECTION OF D.H.
                                                       §       COURT AT LAW

                                                       §       NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                          PER CURIAM

        This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
        A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--
at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas
Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may
enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an
appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement
of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
        On June 13, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, T.D.D., that the filing fee in
this appeal is due and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid on or
before June 23. The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid the fee or
otherwise shown that he is excused from paying the fee.1

        1 The case information sheet from the Nacogdoches County District Clerk’s Office reflects that Appellant
was not declared indigent in the trial court.
         Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).2

Opinion delivered June 30, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

         2 We also note that Appellant has not filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Nor

does Appellant’s notice of appeal comply with appellate Rule 9.5 or Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice
and Remedies Code. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a)
(West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s
record).
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                             JUNE 30, 2023

                                         NO. 12-23-00158-CV

                THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE PROTECTION OF D. H.

                                Appeal from the County Court at Law
                      of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C2338524)

       THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

       It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.

                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J