Court Opinion

ID: 9947030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-01 21:01:32.878393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:45.464503
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2001      Doc: 14         Filed: 02/29/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-2001

        BOYD ALLEN GAMBER,

                             Party-in-Interest - Appellant,

                      v.

        WEST VIRGINIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, d/b/a West Virginia
        American Water, a West Virginia corporation; AMERICAN WATER WORKS
        SERVICE COMPANY, INC., a New Jersey corporation; AMERICAN WATER
        WORKS COMPANY INC., a Delaware corporation; EASTMAN CHEMICAL
        COMPANY, a Deleware corporation; GARY SOUTHERN; DENNIS P.
        FARRELL,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
        Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:14-cv-01374)

        Submitted: February 27, 2024                                 Decided: February 29, 2024

        Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Boyd Allen Gamber, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah E. Greenspan, BLANK ROME LLP,
        Washington, D.C. for Appellee Eastman Chemical Company.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2001      Doc: 14        Filed: 02/29/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Boyd Allen Gamber appeals the district court’s order denying his claim for relief

        against West Virginia American-Water Company. We have reviewed the record and

        discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gamber v.

        W. Va.-Am. Water Co., No. 2:14-cv-01374 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 8, 2023). We dispense with

        oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2