Court Opinion

ID: 996403
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:50:20.284433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.800649
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-1474

THOMAS G. RUTHERS, II,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

HENRY LOWERY, Interstate Agreement Adminis-
trator; THE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-679-2)

Submitted:   September 10, 1998       Decided:   September 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas G. Ruthers, II, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West
Virginia; Leslie K. Kiser, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order partially denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Ruthers v. Lowery, No. CA-97-679-2 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 24, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2