Court Opinion

ID: 9584986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:54:45.192234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:25:18.865333
License: Public Domain

LUMPKIN, Judge:
concurs.
¶ 1 I concur in the Court’s decision to affirm the judgments and sentences in Counts I and III, the judgment in Count II and to remand Count II for resentencing. On remand the evidence is sufficient, excluding evidence of the murders of Appellant’s ex-girlfriend and their child, to submit the aggravating circumstance of continuing threat to the jury. This evidence includes two (2) prior adjudicated offenses, evidence that Appellant laughed at scaring the store *913clerk during the robbery, and evidence of violent behavior and instances of misconduct by Appellant while he was previously incarcerated, including threats to take a guard hostage if given the death penalty. This evidence is sufficient for a jury to consider and determine whether it is sufficient to support a finding of the existence of the continuing threat aggravator.