Court Opinion

ID: 3550635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:03:29.402694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:23:06.206285
License: Public Domain

The exception cannot be sustained. Griswold v. Chandler, 6 N.H. 61; Wendell v. French, 19 N.H. 205, 214; *Page 403 
Mathes v. Bennett, 21 N.H. 188, 203; Kingman v. Kingman, 31 N.H. 182, 192; Clarke v. Clay, 31 N.H. 393, 404; Whitcher v. Benton, 50 N.H. 25; Olcott v. Thompson, 59 N.H. 154, 157; Nutter v. Varney, 64 N.H. 334.  The question of justice presented by the appellant's motion for costs, was a question of fact determinable at the trial term. The decision of that question required a consideration of evidence that is not stated in the case. It does not appear that wrong would have been done if the appellee had recovered a portion or the whole of his costs.
Exception overruled.
BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.