Court Opinion

ID: 3856646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:42:17.15234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:59.211933
License: Public Domain

Argued April 24, 1923.
The plaintiff got a verdict in assumpsit in the county court, but judgment was entered for defendant n.o.v. On plaintiff's petition to the common pleas for leave to appeal to that court, an order was made directing the county court to enter judgment on the verdict for the plaintiff. From that action defendant has appealed to this court, contending defendant was not legally liable.
Plaintiff was a brick subcontractor under contract with one, Bernstein, to do certain brick work on premises owned by defendant, Green. During the progress of the *Page 388 
work, the bricklayers struck. Before the strike was settled, defendant proposed to plaintiff to pay him $350 in addition to what he was to receive from the general contractor, Bernstein, under the subcontract if plaintiff would pay the bricklayers employed by him the increased rate of wages demanded by them (and for which they struck) and have them start work immediately. Plaintiff accepted the proposal and performed, but defendant refused to pay. The verdict determines that the contract was made and performed. The county court set it aside and entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, upon the ground that plaintiff in any event was bound to have the bricklaying done under his contract with the subcontractor, and that defendant's promise to pay him $350 in the circumstances mentioned was without consideration. As plaintiff was not bound to perform for defendant, but only to perform his subcontract with Bernstein, there was consideration for the agreement with defendant to pay the increased wages and start the bricklayers immediately, something he was not bound to do for the general contractor: Russell v. Patterson, 48 Pa. Super. 571, at page 578. Having performed, he should have judgment.
Judgment affirmed.