Court Opinion

ID: 4281513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-06 00:00:19.817479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:34.447322
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-11213      Document: 00514500584         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/05/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-11213                                FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                           June 5, 2018
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

RANDY FLORES ORTIZ, also known as Blue,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:17-CR-16-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Randy Flores Ortiz has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ortiz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ortiz’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11213    Document: 00514500584    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/05/2018

                                No. 17-11213

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2