Court Opinion

ID: 9740672
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:40:08.768554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:19.629705
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
In its petition for rehearing, the State refers us to Craig v. State (1985), Ind., 484 N.E.2d 566. We are not unaware of the Craig decision. However, Yarborough v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 206, which we followed in our decision finding Correll's conviction for a crime containing an element not present in the charging information could not stand, is the more recent pronouncement by our supreme court. We believe we are bound by the latest pronouncement of our supreme court and follow Yarborough.
Rehearing is denied.
RILEY and BAKER, JJ., concur.