Court Opinion

ID: 3831656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:02:33.918948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:08.924897
License: Public Domain

In this action the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the court rendered judgment on the verdict. Motion for a new trial was filed by the defendant, and on the 20th day of March, 1918, the same was overruled. A part of the order overruling the motion for new trial reads as follows:
"Thereupon, the defendant prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, which appeal is allowed, and the defendant is granted sixty days from and after this date in which to prepare and serve a case-made on the plaintiff."
Under this order the time expired on May 19, 1918. Thereafter, and on the 20th day of May, 1918, on the application of Amos K. Bass, defendant in the court below, the court granted an extension of 30 days' time for defendant, Amos K. Bass, in which to perfect case-made. The case-made was served on the attorney for N. Dowd, plaintiff in the court below, on June 19, 1918.
Held, That the court was without jurisdiction to make the order extending the time to make and serve case-made on the 20th day of May, 1918, time having expired on May 19, 1918, and the appeal did not confer jurisdiction upon this court. Tanner v. Crawford, 80 Okla. 183, 195 P. 138; Lovejoy, Russell 
James v. Graham et al., 33 Okla. 129, 124 P. 25; Soliss v. Davis, 28 Okla. 496, 114 P. 609.
It follows that this proceeding must be and is hereby, dismissed.
HARRISON, C. J., and KANE, JOHNSON, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.