Court Opinion

ID: 9534473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:40:09.454119+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:52.201260
License: Public Domain

*593Mr. Justice Day
specially concurring:
In concurring in this opinion I wish to make a special point of the fact that this decision is in no way out of harmony with Elliott v. District Court, 157 Colo. 229, 402 P.2d 65.
Although Elliott, like Allen in the case at bar, was employed, he did all of the things necessary to show to the court that he was in fact indigent, and that after paying his expenses for himself, a wife and two children, he, in fact, had no money left over to pay counsel fees. As a more detailed recital of the record discloses in this case, Allen did nothing that Elliott did to show to the court a condition of indigency.