Court Opinion

ID: 8447604
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:30:30.17058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.456106
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pierre Richard Augustin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claims against some but not all of the defendants named in his suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order that Augus-tin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *244legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.