Court Opinion

ID: 5968046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:25:10.371309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:23.589426
License: Public Domain

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2009, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.