Court Opinion

ID: 4687326
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-17 07:22:45.143731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:04:41.153595
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                    NO. PD-1201-20

                          ABIGAIL VILLEGAS, Appellant

                                           V.

                               THE STATE OF TEXAS

               ON APPELLANT'S AND STATE'S PETITIONS FOR
                       DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
                   FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
                            SMITH COUNTY

      Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

                                     OPINION

      Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to twenty years in prison

for each conviction. In the bill of costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 time

payment fee and conditionally assessed an additional $15 time payment fee if any part of a
                                                                                  Villegas - 2

fine, courts costs, or restitution is paid on or after the 31st day after the date the judgment

assessing the fine, court costs, or restitution is entered. See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE §

133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as being

unconstitutional. Villegas v. State, No. 06-20-00063-CR, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8809 (Tex.

App. – Texarkana Nov. 13, 2020) (not designated for publication).

       The State has filed a petition for discretionary review challenging the court’s

constitutional analysis. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v. State, Nos. PD-

0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021),

in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed prematurely because the pendency

of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. As a result, there was no need to reach

the State’s constitutional arguments.

       We grant review on our own motion of the following ground:

       Should the “Time Payment Fee” be struck as prematurely assessed?

Addressing that ground in light of Dulin, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals,

and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The State’s petition is refused. Appellant’s petition is also refused.

DELIVERED May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH