Court Opinion

ID: 6663046
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:03:44.594866+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:00:14.852940
License: Public Domain

Morrissey, C. J.
Defendant was duly appointed guardian of the person and estate of her husband, insane. As such guardian a large amount of property came into her hands. Subsequently her ward died intestate, leaving defendant and an incompetent son as his sole heirs. ■ Many years went by without her making- any account of her doings as such guardian. This suit was instituted for the purpose of compelling an accounting and recovering the amount due the son. The county Court entered a decree directing her to pay over the amount found to be due the son, to wit, $10,688.78. Defendant undertook to prosecute an appeal to the district court, but gave no supersedeas bond. On motion of plaintiff the appeal was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, defendant prosecutes this appeal.
“An executor, administrator, guardian, or guardian ad litem shall not be required to enter into bond in order to enable him to an appeal.” Rev. St. 1913, sec. 1528. The appeal is based upon the foregoing provisions of the statute. We are firmly committed to the doctrine that it does not apply to appeals not prosecuted in the interest of the estate. It means only that executors, administrators and guardians are not required to give bond when they appeal in their representative capacity. When they appeal to protect individual interests, they should give the same bond that is required of other litigants. In re Estate of Craig, 101 Neb. 439; In re Williams, 97 Neb. 726, and cases, cited therein. The judgment is against defendant, not against the estate; she is the only person interested in the appeal, and she is not entitled to prosecute the same without giving the bond.
The judgment is
Aeeirmed.
Sedgwick, J., not sitting.