Court Opinion

ID: 8269684
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:23:01.837266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:28.479165
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The questions raised on the appeal in this case are identical with those reviewed and decided in Hedden v. Hand, No. 24 o! the March term, 1919 (see aiüe p. 535), and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the order of the court of chancery is reversed.
For affirmance — "White—1.
For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, I-Ieppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner — 10.