Court Opinion

ID: 6635597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:39:48.986532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:20.137523
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy lace articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Hoods and hats in chief value of cellulose filaments like those the subject of Arnberg Schwab v. United States (T. D. 46204) were held dutiable as compounds of cellulose at 60 percent under paragraph 31.