Court Opinion

ID: 4110823
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-23 20:09:40.344817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:07.894810
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1282
CA 16-00413
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

COUNTY OF ERIE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

                      V                           MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANCIS B. VOLANTE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ANTHONY B. TARGIA OF
COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SMITH, MURPHY & SCHOEPPERLE, LLP, BUFFALO (STEPHEN P. BROOKS OF
COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Catherine
R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), dated August 17, 2015. The order granted in
part the motion of defendant for summary judgment.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed without costs.

     Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to General
Municipal Law § 207-c (6) seeking to enforce its right to be
reimbursed for the salary and medical expenses paid on behalf of a
police officer who was injured when his patrol car collided with a
motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant. Supreme Court granted
defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part, concluding that
plaintiff’s “claim is . . . limited to those amounts it has paid in
excess of basic economic loss.” We affirm.

     Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, its “potential recovery
pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c (6) of payments made to a
police officer injured by the alleged negligence of the defendant in
her ownership and operation of an automobile is limited by Insurance
Law article 51” (Village of Suffern v Baels, 215 AD2d 751, 751).
Thus, the court properly determined that plaintiff can recover only
those amounts paid to its employee pursuant to section 207-c that are
in excess of basic economic loss as that term is defined by article 51
of the Insurance Law (see Incorporated Vil. of Freeport v Sanders, 101
AD2d 808, 809; City of Buffalo v Murry, 79 AD2d 1096, 1096, lv denied
53 NY2d 601).

Entered:    December 23, 2016                   Frances E. Cafarell
                                                Clerk of the Court