Court Opinion

ID: 6498281
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-06 20:01:01.443676+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:30.048270
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10879      Date Filed: 07/06/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 22-10879
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EUGENE A. LIGHT,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Northern District of Florida
           D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-00021-AW-GRJ-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10879         Date Filed: 07/06/2022    Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-10879

Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
        Richard Summa, appointed counsel for Eugene Light in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Light’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.