Court Opinion

ID: 994757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:27:41.760376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:57.854915
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RODNEY KEITH INGRAM,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-95-171, CA-97-304-1)

Submitted:   February 24, 1998            Decided:   April 20, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Keith Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Ingram, Nos. CR-95-171; CA-97-304-1
(M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2