Court Opinion

ID: 4438420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-16 12:13:23.798718+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:51:32.694117
License: Public Domain

In The
                                Court of Appeals
                       Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                      No. 07-18-00388-CR

                             PEDRO GARCIA, JR., APPELLANT

                                              V.

                            THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                             On Appeal from the 364th District Court
                                     Lubbock County, Texas
            Trial Court No. 2016-408,822, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding

                                    September 13, 2019

                      ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                       Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

       Appellant Pedro Garcia, Jr. has appealed his conviction for murder and sentence

of thirty-five years’ imprisonment.1 The court has performed its initial review of the record.

The record shows that after receiving the jury’s verdict on punishment, the court excused

the jury, permitted a victim impact statement, and remanded appellant to the custody of

       1   See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b)(1) (West 2019).
the sheriff.   The record does not reflect, however, that the court orally pronounced

appellant’s sentence.

       A trial court must pronounce a defendant’s sentence orally in the defendant’s

presence. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.03, § 1(a) (West 2018); Edic v. State, Nos.

03-17-00788-CR, 03-17-00789-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 3222, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin

May 8, 2018) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing Taylor v.

State, 131 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Ex parte Madding, 70 S.W.3d 131,

135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)). If sentence is not orally pronounced, the trial court’s written

judgment is invalid and without a valid written judgment there is no conviction to appeal.

Id. (citing Thompson v. State, 108 S.W.3d 287, 290 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)). Hence, an

appellate court lacks jurisdiction if a notice of appeal is filed.

       In the present matter, because sentence was not orally pronounced in appellant’s

presence, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal. Keys v. State,

340 S.W.3d 526, 529 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2011, no pet.). However, the problem is

remediable without dismissal.

       Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.4 we abate the appeal and remand

the cause to the trial court so that it may pronounce the jury’s sentence in open court with

appellant present. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4; Edic, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 3222, at *3.

       On remand, the trial court shall provide notice of a hearing and at that hearing

orally pronounce the sentence assessed by the jury in appellant’s presence. We direct

the trial court to conduct the sentencing hearing within thirty days of the date of this order.

A reporter’s record of the hearing shall be prepared and filed in the record of this appeal

                                                2
along with a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s new judgment of

conviction. These supplemental records shall be filed with the clerk of this court within

forty-five days of the date of this order. Appellant’s appeal shall be reinstated when the

supplemental records are filed. On reinstatement, the court will consider the appeal

based on the record and briefs already filed.2

      It is so ordered

                                                       Per Curiam

Do not publish.

      2 After review of the record, we notified appellant and the State of our conclusion.
Both responded and agree that abatement and remand are appropriate.

                                            3