Court Opinion

ID: 6918453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:51:27.803507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:43.789354
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Petitioner’s application for a writ of mandamus against the respondent herein is denied. Jewell v. Davies, 6 Cir., 192 F.2d 670, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 904, 72 S.Ct. 635, 96 L.Ed. 1323; Hudson Lumber Co. v. United States Plywood Corp., 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 929, 930; Roche v. Evaporated Milk Association, 319 U.S. 21, 63 S.Ct. 938, 87 L.Ed. 1185; Massey-Harris-Ferguson, Ltd. v. Boyd, 6 Cir., 242 F.2d 800, 803, certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 806, 78 S.Ct. 48, 2 L.Ed.2d 50.