Court Opinion

ID: 800645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-05-21 19:58:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:59:56.833221
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                          MAY 21 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                         U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-30236

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00535-BR

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
JOSEPH OQUENDO SALADINO,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Oregon
                     Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted May 15, 2012 **

Before:        CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

       Joseph Oquendo Saladino appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 60-

month sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saladino’s

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. Saladino has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

No answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                    10-30236