Court Opinion

ID: 4689935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-25 20:01:16.461573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:22.927877
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAY 25 2021
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    20-10067

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00180-RS-2

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
ANTOINE FOWLER,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of California
                    Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted May 18, 2021**

Before:      CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

      Antoine Fowler appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for being a felon in possession of

a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fowler’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Fowler the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                 20-10067