Court Opinion

ID: 5094329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 16:34:46.353475+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:32.382903
License: Public Domain

Case Number: 05-97-00203-CV 03/24/1999 Record returned to Court of Appeals 01/08/1998 Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the mandate date of a process 01/08/1998 Mandate issued 12/29/1997 Notice from Counsel of a change in address 12/04/1997 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed petition granted pursuant to TRAP 59.1 12/04/1997 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed petition granted pursuant to TRAP 59.1 12/04/1997 Writ of error issued to Court of Appeals. 12/04/1997 Opinion issued ca judgment reversed; remanded to ca 12/04/1997 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record 09/22/1997 supplemental brief 09/08/1997 Jurisdictional letter, re: suppl brief 07/02/1997 Case forwarded to Court 06/25/1997 Reply filed 06/13/1997 Call received 06/10/1997 Application for Writ of Error - Filed 06/10/1997 Phone call from Clerk's Office
 OPINION AND ORDER
The final judgment in this case was signed by the trial court on October 18, 1996. A motion for new trial was timely filed on November 18, 1996. Appellant's perfecting instrument was due to be filed no later than January 16, 1997. Appellant did not file his notice of filing cash deposit in lieu of cost bond until January 27, 1997. In response to this Court's request for briefing on the issue of our jurisdiction in light of the untimely appeal bond, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his bond. Appellee filed a reply brief addressing the jurisdictional issue and an accompanying motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Because appellant did not file his motion for extension of time to file his appeal bond within fifteen days of the last date his bond was due to be filed, we are without authority to consider his motion. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant's *Page 671 
Motion to Extend Time to File Cash Deposit in Lieu of Bond is hereby DISMISSED.
Furthermore, because appellant did not file either his cash deposit in lieu of bond or his motion for extension of time within the time allowed, we conclude he did not make a bona fide attempt to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. SeeVerburgt v. Dorner, 928 S.W.2d 654, 656 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1996, writ granted) (in order to make a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court's jurisdiction, some instrument, whether or not correct, must be timely
filed); see also Kleck Mechanical, Inc. v. Pack Bros.Constr. Co., 930 S.W.2d 190, 191-92 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1996, n.w.h.). Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal isGRANTED. This appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. TEX.R.APP.P. 41(a)(1) and (2).
It is ORDERED that appellee, American Indemnity Company, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Gerald Matthew Boyd and from the cash deposit in lieu of cost bond. After all costs have been paid, the clerk of the district court is directed to release the balance, if any, of the cash deposit to Charles L. Hoedebeck, PC.