Court Opinion

ID: 7214916
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 00:29:20.182595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:57.484301
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
David Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. North Carolina, No. CA-02-761-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Nov. 6, 2002; entered Nov. 7, 2002). We deny Smith’s motion to relieve the state court judge from his judicial obligations. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.