Court Opinion

ID: 2860577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 20:52:30.512594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:29.965441
License: Public Domain

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">6</A>-00<A NAME="2">709</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>and</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><CENTER>NO.  03-97-00003-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>

<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Texas Exotic Feline Foundation, Inc. and Gene Reitnauer</A>, Appellants</CENTER>
	

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><A NAME="4">Dan Morales, Attorney General of the State of Texas; The State of Texas; and Texas Exotic
Feline Foundation, Inc., in Receivership</A>, Appellees</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">TRAVIS</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">345TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">96-14173</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">JOSEPH H. HART</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING </STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</P>

</STRONG><STRONG>PER CURIAM</STRONG>

<P>	This Court has pending before it two appeals:  one from a temporary restraining order and
one from an order imposing a temporary injunction and appointing a receiver.  There have been various
proceedings in this court ancillary to the interlocutory appeal.  By its response of October 13, 1997,
appellees have informed us that the trial on the merits has been held.  Accordingly, these interlocutory
appeals are moot.  We dismiss any pending motions in either cause and dismiss each appeal.</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and Kidd</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Appeals Dismissed as Moot</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Filed:   October 30, 1997</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>