Court Opinion

ID: 9838137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-05 14:00:34.758643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:35:24.153065
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-14453    Document: 44-1     Date Filed: 09/05/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 21-14453
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       KEVIN HOOKS,
       a.k.a. Mush,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Georgia
                 D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00058-LAG-TQL-23
USCA11 Case: 21-14453      Document: 44-1     Date Filed: 09/05/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 21-14453

                            ____________________

       Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and ABUDU and ANDERSON,
       Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Chevene King, Jr., counsel for Kevin Hooks in this direct
       criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
       tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor-
       nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
       ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Hooks’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED.