Court Opinion

ID: 9957242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-03 21:01:18.715069+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:14.028309
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7052      Doc: 6        Filed: 04/02/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-7052

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        DAVID HILL,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

        Submitted: March 28, 2024                                           Decided: April 2, 2024

        Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7052         Doc: 6      Filed: 04/02/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying, pursuant to a prior prefiling

        injunction, Hill’s request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration and/or to supplement

        the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, and further denying Hill’s motion for relief

        from judgment in a separate civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error in either ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United

        States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 19, 2023 & entered Sept.

        20, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                      2