Court Opinion

ID: 5390393
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 09:46:40.052603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:17.670814
License: Public Domain

Memorandum: Plaintiff’s action being based upon the alleged negligence of the employer railroad, its officers and employees, assumption of risk is not available as a defense (U. S. Code, tit. 45, § 54, as amd. in 1939) and should be stricken from appellant’s answer. Contributory negligence, while not a bar to recovery, goes to mitigation of damages. The fact that it may be proved under a general denial which puts in issue not only the defendant’s negligence but also the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, does not, we feel, require that it be stricken in the absence of a showing that plaintiff would be prejudiced. No such showing is made. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out portions of the answer of defendant railroad company.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.