Court Opinion

ID: 9549361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:16:48.09313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:20:11.604465
License: Public Domain

GILLETTE, J.,
concurring.
I join in the result reached by the majority on the basis of the following simple (but compelling) analysis: I *673take it that we would all agree that, had White caused the car to go out of control by interfering with Morgan —by striking her, or pulling her hair or pouring hot coffee on her — the White homeowner’s policy would provide coverage. If that is so, then it seems to me that it would be ludicrous in the extreme to say that, because White chose to interfere with the car’s progress (the same result) by grabbing the wheel rather than Morgan, there is no coverage.