Court Opinion

ID: 5812425
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:50:18.191082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:53.654110
License: Public Domain

On this appeal from a judgment rendered on Appellant. 1974, in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of four and one half to nine years’ imprisonment, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record, has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) (see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid appealable *882issue and that the appeal is, therefore, frivolous. After a review of the record and proceedings in this case, this court agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised on this appeal that would not be frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Lane, JJ.