Court Opinion

ID: 2923669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:51:12.196335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:49.363201
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-04-00268-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 

ALFREDO SOTERO CHAY,	Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,	Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, Alfredo Sotero Chay, pro se, has filed a clerk's record with this Court.  By
letter issued on May 27, 2004, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that, upon review
of the record, it did not appear that an appeal had been perfected or that a petition for writ
of mandamus had been filed in connection with this cause.  The Clerk informed appellant
that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect were not cured within ten days from the
date of receipt of the Court's directive.  Appellant's responses, filed with this Court on June
21 and July 12, stated that appellant did not recall what had been filed with the Court and
that appellant was unable to further pursue the matter.  
	Appellant's responses fail to show that appellant desires to prosecute this matter
or that this Court has jurisdiction over this matter as an appeal or an original proceeding. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b) (requiring a "sufficient" notice of appeal), 42.2(a) (governing
voluntary dismissals in criminal cases).  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

								PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).  
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 8th day of November, 2007.