Court Opinion

ID: 4698870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-26 00:00:32.335429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:05.153950
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-50537     Document: 00515915717         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/25/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                      FILED
                                                                  June 25, 2021
                                  No. 20-50537                   Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                    Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Charles Edward Turner, III,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 6:19-CR-124-1

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Charles Edward Turner, III, has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplement in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Turner has filed responses. The

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50537      Document: 00515915717          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/25/2021

                                    No. 20-50537

   record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of
   Turner’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to
   consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States
   v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Turner’s responses. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion to
   appoint substitute counsel is DENIED.

                                          2