Court Opinion

ID: 994928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:29:57.535638+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:29.830181
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6100

ANTHONY LAMAR DAVIS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-97-128-6)

Submitted:   April 16, 1998                   Decided:   May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Davis v. North Carolina Attorney Gen., No. CA-97-128-6 (M.D.N.C.
Jan. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2