Court Opinion

ID: 2925564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:23:26.011876+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:29.736163
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-167-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_____________________________________________________________

COLUMBIA RIO GRANDE HEALTHCARE,
L.P. D/B/A RIO GRANDE REGIONAL
HOSPITAL,                                                                      Appellant,

                                             v.

AURORA PEDROZA GARCIA, ET AL.,                     Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

  On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P., d/b/a Rio Grande Regional

Hospital, and appellees, Aurora Pedroza Garcia, et al., have filed an agreed motion to

reverse the trial court’s judgment, remand the cause to the trial court in aid of settlement,

and accelerate the mandate. The parties further ask that this Court tax the costs of appeal
or in the trial court against the party incurring same. According to the motion, the parties

have agreed to a settlement of all controversies.

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to

reverse and remand and accelerate the mandate, is of the opinion that the motion should

be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion is GRANTED, and the trial

court’s judgment is REVERSED without regard to the merits and the cause is REMANDED

to the trial court in aid of settlement.

       We direct the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate contemporaneously with this

opinion. See id. 18.1(c) (modifying the time for issuance of mandate “if the parties so

agree, or for good cause on the motion of a party.”). Pursuant to the agreement of the

parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

                                                                PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 15th day of May, 2008.

                                             2