Court Opinion

ID: 3066235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-14 23:52:31.852071+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:48:06.689276
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

        CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
                  Appellant

                           v.

              SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.,
                      Appellee
               ______________________

                 2014-1822, 2014-1823
                ______________________

   Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00097, IPR2013-00102.
                ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    RICHARD TORCZON, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also
represented by JEFFREY WILLIAM GUISE, PETER R.
MUNSON, LORELEI PEREZ WESTIN, San Diego, CA.

   BRADLEY THOMAS LENNIE, Hunton & Williams LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN; DAVID A.
KELLY, Atlanta, GA.
    MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solictor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented
by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

       PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg-
es).
             AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                        ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 10, 2015                 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
    Date                        Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court