Court Opinion

ID: 4650312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-01-11 08:16:13.570694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:32.546405
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-20-00369-CV

                    COURT OF APPEALS

            THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

              CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

HV, LLC D/B/A CIRCO HERMANOS
VASQUEZ, AURORA
ENTERTAINMENT MARKETING, LLC,
RAMON VASQUEZ, JOSE VASQUEZ,
ALDO VASQUEZ, JESUS VASQUEZ
GUILLERMO 'MEMO' VASQUEZ,                              Appellants,

                                   v.

RACIEL JUAREZ,
S2DIO HVAC, LLC, AND
CARRIGAN & ANDERSON, PLLC,                         Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina
          Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
      This cause is before the Court on appellants’ amended motion to dismiss.

Appellants assert the underlying trial court has not disposed of all pending parties and

claims.

      In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har-

Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order

subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

      Accordingly, the amended motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

                                                       GINA M. BENAVIDES
                                                       Justice

Delivered and filed the
7th day of January, 2021.

                                            2