Court Opinion

ID: 9351882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-04 01:00:18.798511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:12.701265
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10078        Document: 00516596027             Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/03/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 22-10078
                                    Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                                                               January 3, 2023
                                                                                Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                         Clerk

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Griselda Rodriguez-Michel,

                                                                 Defendant—Appellant.

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:21-CR-56-1

   Before Higginbotham, Graves and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Griselda
   Rodriguez-Michel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Michel has not filed a
   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

         *   This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5
Case: 22-10078    Document: 00516596027         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/03/2023

                                 No. 22-10078

   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2