Court Opinion

ID: 9825266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:26:12.255772+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:38.423070
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The original opinion' reversing and remanding this case was rendered, and the opinion handed down June 21, 1938.
It affirmatively appears from the application for rehearing by the State, and the certificate thereto, that the mandatory. provisions of Rule 38 have not been complied with which necessitates an order here striking the application for rehearing aforesaid. Crow v. State, ante, p. 319, 183 So. 897, 907 (on rehearing).
The mere mailing to opposing counsel a copy of the application for rehearing and brief in support within fifteen days thereof will not suffice. Service thereof, pnder Rule 38, must be had with*402in the allotted fifteen days. See In re State ex rel. Attorney General, 185 Ala. 347, 64 So. 310; Ex parte State ex rel. Breitling, 221 Ala. 398, 128 So. 788; Taylor v. Lunsford et al., 26 Ala.App. 127, 154 So. 608; Grand Lodge, K. P. of North America v. Walker, 26 Ala.App. 132, 154 So. 827.
Application stricken.