Court Opinion

ID: 9965885
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-03 18:00:37.954804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:52.017274
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-50597            Document: 42-1        Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/03/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                   ____________
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 23-50597
                                  Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                  ____________                                     May 3, 2024
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Felipe Michelle Medina-Rodriguez,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 2:22-CR-2536-1
                   ______________________________

Before Duncan, Wilson, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Felipe Michelle Medina-
Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medina-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-50597         Document: 42-1       Page: 2     Date Filed: 05/03/2024

                                   No. 23-50597

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, we note that
the order revoking Medina-Rodriguez’s supervised release contains a clerical
error in that it states that he pleaded not true to the allegations in the petition
to revoke although the record reflects that he pleaded true to those
allegations.
       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the
district court for the limited purposed of correcting the revocation order to
state that Medina-Rodriguez pleaded true to the pertinent allegations. See
Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

                                        2