Court Opinion

ID: 2862101
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 22:16:58.731485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:21.538399
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-98-00681-CR

Steven James Allinger, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 48,701, HONORABLE C.W. DUNCAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

After accepting his guilty plea, the district court found appellant Steven James
Allinger guilty of theft.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West 1994 & Supp.
1999).  The court assessed punishment at incarceration in a state jail for one year.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d
137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				                                                                       

				Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed:   June 30, 1999

Do Not Publish