Court Opinion

ID: 4879165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 19:14:36.209987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.796031
License: Public Domain

People v Barthel (2021 NY Slip Op 04835)

People v Barthel

2021 NY Slip Op 04835

Decided on August 26, 2021

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 26, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

498 KA 18-00163

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJOSEPH T. BARTHEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) 

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered October 19, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law
§ 140.25 [2]). We affirm. The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Defendant's challenge to the purported restitution order is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Schmiege, 172 AD3d 1897, 1898 [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: August 26, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court