Court Opinion

ID: 9503791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 19:49:05.159122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:44.161681
License: Public Domain

KELLY, J.
(concurring). In her partial dissent, Justice CORRIGAN asserts that my position in this case is inconsistent with my position in Kirksey v Manitoba Pub Ins Corp.1 She is incorrect. The plaintiff in Kirksey was an independent contractor. In this case, plaintiff is not an independent contractor; he is employed by a corporation. My colleague fails to recognize that this material difference distinguishes the case at bar not only from Kirksey, but from the other cases she discusses, as well.

 Kirksey v Manitoba Pub Ins Corp, 191 Mich App 12; 477 NW2d 442 (1991).