Court Opinion

ID: 9898424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-14 19:30:37.042431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:18.383921
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
                         DIVISION ONE

IN THE MATTER OF THE PERSONAL
RESTRAINT OF:                                           No. 84573-0-I

                                                        DIVISION ONE
TERRANCE JOE QUINLAN,
                                                        UNPUBLISHED OPINION
                                 Petitioner.

        PER CURIAM — Terrance Joe Quinlan filed a personal restraint petition

challenging his restraint under the judgments and sentences entered in King County

Superior Court Cause Nos. 15-1-00767-6 SEA and 15-1-00794-3 SEA. In each matter,

Quinlan pleaded guilty to one count of domestic violence felony violation of a court order.1

It is undisputed that each of these offenses was a crime against a person under RCW

9.94A.411 and a class C felony. For each offense, the sentencing court imposed a prison-

based drug offender sentencing alternative (DOSA) sentence specifying that Quinlan

would serve 30 months in confinement, followed by 30 months of community custody.

Each judgment and sentence specified, additionally, “If the defendant fails to complete the

[DOSA] program or is administratively terminated from the program, he/she shall be

reclassified . . . to serve the balance of the unexpired term of sentence.” And, the

following provision (“12-month additional community custody provision”) appears at the

bottom of page four of each judgment and sentence:

        1 In Cause No. 15-1-00767-6 SEA, Quinlan also pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a

stolen vehicle; however, that conviction is not at issue in this personal restraint petition proceeding.
No. 84573-0-I/2

        The court further imposes an additional term of Community Custody of 12
        months upon failure to complete or administrative termination from DOSA
        program if any of these offenses is a crime against a person (RCW
        9.94A.411) or a felony violation of RCW 69.50/52. The defendant in this
        event shall comply with the conditions of Community Custody set forth in
        section 4.7 herein.

        Quinlan contends that the 12-month additional community custody provision

renders each judgment and sentence invalid because the provision, if implemented, will

result in a sentence in excess of the statutory, 60-month maximum for class C felonies. 2

See RCW 9A.20.021 (maximum term of confinement for a class C felony is five years);

see also RCW 9.94A.701(3)(a), (10) (directing the court to impose an additional one-year

term of community custody when sentencing a person for a crime against a person but

also providing that “[t]he term of community custody specified by this section shall be

reduced by the court whenever an offender’s standard range term of confinement in

combination with the term of community custody exceeds the statutory maximum for the

crime as provided in RCW 9A.20.021”). The State “agrees that there is a possibility, if

Quinlan fails the DOSA sentence, for the total amount of confinement and community

custody to total 72 months, exceeding the statutory maximum.” Accordingly, the State

concedes that Quinlan’s petition should be granted and the matter remanded to the

superior court to strike the 12-month additional community custody provision from the

judgments and sentences at issue.

        We accept the State’s concession, grant Quinlan’s petition to the extent it

challenges the 12-month additional community custody provision, and remand to the

superior court to strike that provision from the judgments and sentences entered in King

        2 Quinlan raised additional claims in his petition; however, only his challenge to the 12-month

additional community custody provision was referred to a panel for determination on the merits.

                                                 -2-
No. 84573-0-I/3

County Superior Court Cause Nos. 15-1-00767-6 SEA and 15-1-00794-3 SEA.

                              FOR THE COURT:

                                    -3-