Court Opinion

ID: 9352664
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-09 07:06:56.566515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:28.803959
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                            FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                             ORDER

Appellate case name:      Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez

Appellate case number:    01-22-00409-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-52596

Trial court:              246th District Court of Harris County

         Appellant Claudia Arellano filed a Motion for Substitution of Counsel on December 21,
2022. The motion does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(b). That is, the
motion does not state it was “delivered to the party in person or mailed–both by certified and by
first-class mail–to the party at the party’s last known address.” In addition, the motion does not
contain the certificate of conference required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5).
Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b),
10.1(a)(5).
       It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy
                   Acting individually

Date: January 5, 2023