Court Opinion

ID: 3023722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-13 22:29:36.061396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:48.447047
License: Public Domain

Opinions of the United
2006 Decisions                                                                                                             States Court of Appeals
                                                                                                                              for the Third Circuit

1-27-2006

USA v. Parker
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-3458

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

Recommended Citation
"USA v. Parker" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1708.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1708

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
                                                               NOT PRECEDENTIAL

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

                                     No. 04-3458

                           UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                          v.

                                RAYMOND PARKER,
                                           Appellant

               APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                                D.C. Crim. 03-cr-00250-3
                  District Judge: The Honorable William W. Caldwell

                       Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
                                   January 9, 2006

       Before: BARRY and AMBRO, Circuit Judges, and DEBEVOISE,* District Judge

                           (Opinion Filed: January 27, 2006)

                                      OPINION

   *
   The Honorable Dickinson R. Debevoise, Senior District Judge, United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.
BARRY, Circuit Judge

       Appellant Raymond Parker pled guilty to a one count Information charging him

with Use of a Communication Facility to Facilitate a Felony Drug Crime, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 843(b). The District Court found the quantity and type of drugs involved:

between five and twenty grams of crack cocaine. Based on this finding, the Court

calculated the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range to be 46-48 months imprisonment.

The Court, however, departed downward from this range under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 based

on Parker’s substantial assistance to authorities, and imposed a sentence of thirty months

imprisonment.

       Parker challenges his sentence under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005). Specifically, Parker asserts that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated by the

use of judicial fact finding to enhance his sentence based on the amount of drugs

involved. He contends that there were no admissions, nor any jury findings beyond a

reasonable doubt, regarding the drug quantity.

       Because Parker was sentenced before the Supreme Court’s decision in Booker, his

appeal falls within the ambit of our decision in United States v. Davis, 407 F.3d 162, 166

(3d Cir. 2005) (en banc) (concluding that defendants sentenced before Booker should

have their sentencing challenge “remand[ed] for consideration of the appropriate sentence

by the District Court in the first instance.”). Therefore, although we will affirm Parker’s

conviction, we will vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with

                                             2
Booker.

          3