Court Opinion

ID: 8673160
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:46:14.128977+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.457421
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
John Paul Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 3:02-cr-00064-JPB-7 (N.D.W.Va. May 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.