Court Opinion

ID: 9726775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 13:07:46.957477+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:30.675282
License: Public Domain

Edwards, J.
(concurring). On this record I concur with Mr. Justice Black that the court of claims had jurisdiction and that it should have proceeded to hearing of the claim on the merits since plaintiff’s normal administrative remedy had been barred by the refusal of the commission to issue the redeter-mination called for by the statute.
The basic issue underlying this litigation is dealt with on the merits in my opinion in Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Corporation & Securities Commission, 361 Mich 150.
Smith, J., concurred with Edwards, J.
Kavanagh, J., did not sit.