Court Opinion

ID: 3565788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:15:36.261856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:03.043597
License: Public Domain

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the *Page 330 
statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N.J.L. 455.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 10.
For reversal — HEHER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3. *Page 331