Court Opinion

ID: 9365017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-20 21:00:45.697862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:42.556244
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2083      Doc: 12         Filed: 01/19/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2083

        In re: DARIUS COTY WHITAKER,

                            Petitioner.

                                   On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
                               (4:17-cr-00024-BO-1; 4:21-cv-00067-BO)

        Submitted: January 17, 2023                                       Decided: January 19, 2023

        Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Darius Coty Whitaker, Petitioner Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2083      Doc: 12          Filed: 01/19/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Darius Coty Whitaker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

        court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from

        this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay

        in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                PETITION DENIED

                                                      2