Court Opinion

ID: 4395156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-09 07:48:22.91668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:30:03.739699
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                            OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-89,011-02

                      EX PARTE JASON TODD UNDERHILL, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 706345-A IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. This sentence

has discharged, but Applicant alleges sufficient collateral consequences to invoke this Court’s habeas

jurisdiction.

        Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated when the trial court entered a

judgment nunc pro tunc over twenty years after the original judgment without giving him notice of

the hearing to enter the judgment.
                                                                                                    2

       Both the State and the trial court agree that Applicant was never given notice of the hearing,

nor was he given representation or a chance to appear and contest the entry of that judgment nunc

pro tunc. “Before any unfavorable nunc pro tunc orders are entered the person convicted should be

given an opportunity to be present for the hearing, represented by counsel, in order to accord him due

process of law.” Shaw v. State, 539 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976).

       The trial court finds that Applicant’s due process rights were violated because he was not

provided an opportunity to be present for the nunc pro tunc hearing. We agree.

       Relief is granted. The judgment nunc pro tunc in Cause No. 706345 in the 185th District

Court of Harris County is set aside, and the original judgment is reinstated.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 8, 2019
Do not publish