Court Opinion

ID: 29032
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:33:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:01.050362
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-21306
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE JAVIER DOMINGUEZ-VILLARREAL,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-01-CR-464-ALL
                        --------------------
                          October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jose Javier Dominguez-Villarreal appeals the 96-month

sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of

being found in the United States after deportation following an

aggravated-felony conviction, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

& (b)(2).   He contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is

unconstitutional because it treats a prior aggravated-felony

conviction as a mere sentencing factor and not an element of the

offense.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-21306
                               -2-

     Dominguez-Villarreal acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve

the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001).   Dominguez-

Villarreal’s argument is foreclosed.   The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.