Court Opinion

ID: 9407794
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-10 11:06:54.04335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:40.274975
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued July 6, 2023

                                     In The

                              Court of Appeals
                                     For The

                          First District of Texas
                            ————————————
                              NO. 01-22-00756-CR
                              NO. 01-22-00757-CR
                           ———————————
                 IN RE DAVID FRENCH ORTEGA, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator David French Ortega filed a petition for writ of mandamus in two

trial court cases complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion to

replace appointed counsel.1     After learning that relator’s appointed counsel

withdrew and new counsel was appointed, we issued a notice that the proceeding

1
      The underlying cases are The State of Texas v. David French Ortega, cause
      numbers 1727910 and 1727911, pending in the 263rd District Court of Harris
      County, Texas, the Honorable Amy Martin presiding.
might be dismissed as moot unless relator filed a response establishing that the

proceeding is not moot. On May 30, 2023, relator filed a response conceding that

the proceeding was moot.

        When the relief sought by petition for writ of mandamus is moot because the

act sought to be compelled has already occurred, the petition will be dismissed on

the ground that the relief sought has become moot. See In re Bonilla, 424 S.W.3d

528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Here, the relief sought was the replacement of

appointed counsel. Because the trial court appointed new counsel and relator’s

original appointed counsel withdrew, the relief relator sought in this petition is now

moot.

        We dismiss the petition. Any pending motions are also dismissed as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           2