Court Opinion

ID: 8359428
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-18 00:13:42.499948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:01.693782
License: Public Domain

*32The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cheves.
The evidence to contradict or vary the legal efFedt of the endorsement, 1 think, was not legally admissible: but that is not made a question in this case. The evidence went to the Jury, and was fairly submitted to them. They were the proper judges of it, and the Court sees no reason to believe they drew a wrong conclusion. The motion is, therefore, refused.
Grimké, Colcock, Gantt, and Johnson, J. concurred.
Mott, J. dissented.