Court Opinion

ID: 8428242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 04:28:31.089182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:33.840912
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Xin Fang Xue, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Chand v. INS, 222 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding which was based on inconsistencies between Xue’s asylum hearing testimony and two interviews conducted several days after he arrived in the United States. These inconsistencies regard Xue’s reasons for leaving China and go to the heart of his claim that he fled China because his wife was forced to undergo an abortion. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). Xue also produced a document that was inconsistent with his claim that his mother was arrested in lieu of his wife, who allegedly hid from family planning officials to avoid sterilization. See id. Accordingly, Xue is not eligible for asylum.
Because Xue failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.