Court Opinion

ID: 2926946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:42:57.876042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:11.084623
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-00-00568-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

CORNELIUS SANCHEZ,                                                          Appellant,

                                           v.

KMART CORPORATION,                                   Appellee.
_____________________________________________________________

  On appeal from the 135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides
                   Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      This appeal was abated by this Court on August 26, 2002, due to the bankruptcy

of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally TEX . R. APP. P.

8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On April 16, 2009, the

Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if

applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order
notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and

dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

       The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

                                                        PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 28th day of May, 2009.

                                            2