Court Opinion

ID: 9884950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 03:25:56.766143+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:42.592212
License: Public Domain

*690Weaver, C.J.
I concur in the result of the majority opinion. I write separately to state that I do not join the majority’s constitutional discussion in part II because it is unnecessary to the resolution of this case. See ante, pp 683-685. As to the plaintiff’s tort claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, I note that this Court has not recognized or adopted that tort, see Roberts v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 422 Mich 594; 374 NW2d 905 (1985), and does not do so here. See ante, p 686, n 7. Finally as to plaintiff’s invasion of privacy claim, I agree that summary disposition for the defendant was appropriate pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) (no genuine issue of material fact).