Court Opinion

ID: 9895461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-07 14:10:08.53631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:48.071836
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                       San Antonio, Texas

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                           No. 04-23-00699-CV

                IN RE KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC.

                                           Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                  Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 1, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On July 27, 2023, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion

to stay the underlying suit. We denied the stay, and we requested a response. Real Party in Interest

filed a response, and Relator filed a reply. Because the complained of order was facially self-

contradictory, we remanded the cause and ordered the trial court to file an amended order.

           We reinstate this original proceeding. Having considered the petition, response, reply, and

record, including the amended order, we conclude Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

                                                       PER CURIAM

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-05873, styled Thompson Business Forms, Inc. v. Konica Minolta
Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc., pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable
Antonia Arteaga presiding.