Court Opinion

ID: 991714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:40:51.859709+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:33.040036
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7193

WILLIAM M. BAILEY,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-460-5-F)

Submitted:   February 27, 1997            Decided:   March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bailey
v. Lappin, No. CA-96-460-5-F (E.D.N.C. July 16, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2