Court Opinion

ID: 8677705
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:10:10.75525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.468368
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s *308disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.