Court Opinion

ID: 9907185
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-05 21:23:28.062499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:44.748683
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                                MIDDLE DISTRICT

 GLUE WILKINS,                               : No. 110 MM 2023
                                             :
                      Petitioner             :
                                             :
                                             :
               v.                            :
                                             :
                                             :
 HON. KEVIN A. HESS, SPECIALLY               :
 ASSIGNED SENIOR JUDGE,                      :
 CUMBERLAND COUNTY,                          :
                                             :
                      Respondent             :

                                          ORDER

PER CURIAM

       AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2023, the “King’s Bench Motion,” the “Motion

for Judicial Notice of Change in Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence,” the “Motion for Judicial

Notice that a Criminal Complaint Has Been Filed,” the “Motion for Judicial Notice that the

‘Stipulated’ Exculpatory Medical Report was Docketed,” the “Motion for Video

Conference,” the “Application to File a Response to Defendant’s No Response Letter,”

the “Application to File Additional Informations,” and the “Motion for Judicial Notice that a

Fraud Complaint has been Filed” are DENIED.

       The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.