Court Opinion

ID: 9363675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-17 14:09:10.686162+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:33.437494
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                      San Antonio, Texas

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                          No. 04-23-00010-CR

                                EX PARTE Christopher-Jarvis PAYNE

                                          Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
                  Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 11, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

           Relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Relator is represented by trial counsel

below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481,

498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro

se habeas corpus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see

also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a).

                                                      PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2022CR6932, 2021CR3349, styled State of Texas v. Christopher Payne,
pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.