Court Opinion

ID: 9745666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 23:16:46.006615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:03.940072
License: Public Domain

SILLS, P. J.
I concur in the judgment. I write separately only to underscore my agreement with the majority’s suggestion that a visitation order made contemporaneously with an order terminating reunification services is no longer appealable. Any such challenge must be made by petition for extraordinary writ. This view runs counter to this court’s opinion in In re Megan B. (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 942 [1 Cal.Rptr.2d 177], an opinion in which I concurred. But times, and legislative directives, have changed.
Petitioner’s application for review by the Supreme Court was denied July 8, 1998.