Court Opinion

ID: 8678466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:39:20.998013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.224449
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:-
George Bridges, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bridges v. Townsend, No. 2:12-ev-00703-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. filed July 2, 2015, entered July 6, 2015). We- dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.