Court Opinion

ID: 4315626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-26 18:00:20.347795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:01:08.558710
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-50742      Document: 00514657237         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/26/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-50742                                  FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      September 26, 2018
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO CASTILLO, also known as Alberto Mario Castillo, also known as
Alberto Castillo, Jr., also known as Mario A. Castillo, also known as Mario
Alberto Castillo, also known as Alberto M. Castillo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:16-CR-530-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Mario Castillo has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50742      Document: 00514657237   Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/26/2018

                                 No. 17-50742

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2