Court Opinion

ID: 591585
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:43.781486
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 727
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charles Gene ROGERS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Randy LEE;  Attorney General of North Carolina,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6293.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 29, 1992Decided:  October 5, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.  (CA-89-22-HC-BO)
Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.
Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
Dismissed.
Before HALL, SPROUSE, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Charles Gene Rogers appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.  Rogers v. Lee, No. CA-89-22-HC-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED