Court Opinion

ID: 674779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:55:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:46.035369
License: Public Domain

30 F.3d 129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Howard Jerome HINTON, Petitioner Appellant,v.State of MARYLAND;  Attorney General of the State ofMaryland, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6569.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 23, 1994Decided July 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-404-HAR)
Howard Jerome Hinton, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Hinton v. Maryland, No. CA-93-404-HAR (D. Md. May 10, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED