Court Opinion

ID: 1001826
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:01:27.22423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:38.132369
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO, a/k/a Tony,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-99-265-1)

Submitted:   May 31, 2000                  Decided:   June 15, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roland Richard Acevedo, SEIFF & KRETZ, New York, New York, for Ap-
pellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jose Antonio Lozano seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   See United States v. Lozano, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-99-

265-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1999).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2