Court Opinion

ID: 9616855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:50:30.557849+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:03.288799
License: Public Domain

Justice ExUM
dissenting in part and concurring in part.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Gardner, 315 N.C. 444, 340 S.E. 2d 701 (1986), I dissent from that part of the majority’s decision holding that defendant may be convicted and punished for both felonious breaking and felonious larceny pursuant to the felonious breaking.
I concur in the majority’s treatment of the admissibility of defendant’s confession.
Justices MARTIN and Frye join in this dissenting and concurring opinion.