Court Opinion

ID: 995698
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:41:03.431697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:00.534953
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-1630

JONATHAN IDEMA,

                                                         Appellant,

          and

PATRICIA DAWN GLOSSON,

                                                         Plaintiff,

          versus

EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPO-
RATED, a/k/a Equifax, a/k/a Equifax Options,
a/k/a Equifax Credit Info Services,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-95-104-5-BR)

Submitted:   July 22, 1998                 Decided:   July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Idema, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edmond Weddington, SMITH,
ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order imposing sanc-

tions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Idema v. Equifax

Credit Info. Serv., No. CA-95-104-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1997). We

deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We further

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2