Court Opinion

ID: 6763849
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:34:23.68844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:40.048482
License: Public Domain

On Application for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Phillip Browarsky.
The court coming now to consider its order of June 5, 1991, suspending respondent, Phillip Browarsky, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that Phillip Browarsky be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.
For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Browarsky (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 100, 573 N.E.2d 72.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.