Court Opinion

ID: 9838348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-06 06:10:07.706789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.906414
License: Public Domain

DENY and Opinion Filed August 31, 2023

                                       In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00718-CV

      IN RE CHILDREN’S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS, Relator

           Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2
                            Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02427-B

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove
                          Opinion by Justice Breedlove
      In this original proceeding, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial

court’s July 19, 2023 order denying its Rule 91a motion to dismiss the conspiracy

and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Entitlement to mandamus

relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and

that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

      After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator

has failed to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

230718f.p05                              /Maricela Breedlove/
                                         MARICELA BREEDLOVE
                                         JUSTICE

                                      –2–