Court Opinion

ID: 4182771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-30 19:11:15.366337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:18.107213
License: Public Domain

People v Weisbrod (2017 NY Slip Op 05388)

People v Weisbrod

2017 NY Slip Op 05388

Decided on June 30, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 30, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

926 KA 14-00728

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vJEFFREY P. WEISBROD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAMS HEINL MOODY BUSCHMAN, P.C., AUBURN (MARIO J. GUTIERREZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (ANDREW R. KELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), rendered January 7, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver constitutes a general unrestricted waiver that forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255-256; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928).
Entered: June 30, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court