Court Opinion

ID: 4472508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-14 13:01:28.921271+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:08:36.488858
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 18-1424V
                                         UNPUBLISHED

    JENNIFER MITCHELL,                                        Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                          Filed: December 12, 2019
    v.
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                              Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                        Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)

Edward Zwilling, Schwartz, Zweben & Slingbaum, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

       On September 18, 2018, Jennifer Mitchell filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that the suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to
Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccination on
November 4, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

      On December 5, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that Petitioner “had no history of pain,

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
inflammation or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to [the vaccine],” that
Petitioner had onset of pain within forty-eight hours of vaccine administration, that
Petitioner’s symptoms were limited to her left shoulder, and that Petitioner had no other
condition that would explain her symptoms. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that
the case was timely filed, the vaccine was received in the United States, and the
Petitioner experienced the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than
six months after vaccine administration. Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                  s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Brian H. Corcoran
                                  Chief Special Master

                                            2