Court Opinion

ID: 4697336
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-22 00:00:24.631652+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:31.444353
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-20009     Document: 00515908154         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/21/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                  No. 20-20009                          June 21, 2021
                               Conference Calendar
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Lorenzo Ruiz-Camacho,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:19-CR-235-1

   Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Ruiz-
   Camacho has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ruiz-Camacho has not filed a response. We

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20009     Document: 00515908154          Page: 2    Date Filed: 06/21/2021

                                   No. 20-20009

   have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive
   the untimeliness of Ruiz-Camacho’s appeal. See United States v. Pesina-
   Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Thus, we concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                         2