Court Opinion

ID: 993150
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:03:08.40779+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:53.697833
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EDWARD R. FOX, JR., a/k/a Skip Fox,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-94-44, CA-96-111-4)

Submitted:   September 11, 1997       Decided:   September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward R. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Fox, Nos. CR-94-44; CA-96-111-4 (E.D. Va.
Apr. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2