Court Opinion

ID: 8044432
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:48:48.43851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:25.992811
License: Public Domain

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The “Carpenters Joint Trust Funds,” purportedly acting as *610plaintiffs, commenced this action to compel the defendant contractors to specifically perform an agreement to allow examination of their books and records to determine if they were paying all sums required to be paid to the trust funds. The contractors answered asserting that “Carpenters Joint Trust Funds” is not a legal entity and does not possess the capacity to sue, and asserting that the trustees of the named trusts were the real parties in interest. For some reason not clear from the record these contentions were never resolved and, eventually, summary judgment was entered for “Carpenters Joint Trust Funds.” This appeal followed.
A judgment for a legally nonexistent entity is a nullity. J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. Hasko, 7 Cal.Rptr. 490 (Cal.App. 1960). A party to litigation is either a natural or an artificial person. “Trust Funds” is neither. It is the trustee, or trustees, rather than the trust itself that is entitled to bring suit. Carpenters & Mill. Health B.T.F. v. Domestic Insul. Co., 387 F.Supp. 144 (D.Colo. 1975). Consequently, the summary judgment must be set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings. This contemplates an amended complaint in the names of the proper parties plaintiff having capacity to sue, and a new responsive pleading.
Reversed.