Court Opinion

ID: 686276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:34:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:18.372763
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1480
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alfred Samuel ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-50740.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 1994.*Decided Dec. 14, 1994.

Before:  D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Alfred Samuel Robinson appeals his conviction and 124-month sentence following his guilty pleas to armed bank robbery and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113(a), (d) and 924(c), (d).  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robinson's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3