Court Opinion

ID: 4705663
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-22 18:00:59.358076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:23.735253
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-20096      Document: 00515948018         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/22/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                           July 22, 2021
                                  No. 20-20096                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Leobardo Arres-Gonzalez,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:15-CR-414-1

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leobardo Arres-
   Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arres-Gonzalez has filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20096    Document: 00515948018          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/22/2021

                                  No. 20-20096

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein, as well as Arres-Gonzalez’s response. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
   counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
   DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2