Court Opinion

ID: 8438100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:33:25.751427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.843482
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Eun S. Kim appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. *29812(b)(¿). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Potter, No. 8:09-cv-2973-DKC, 2010 WL 2253656 (D. Md. June 2, 2010). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.