Court Opinion

ID: 7156447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:10:02.821565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:15.110344
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Hargis:
The master commissioner testified that he did not post any advertisement of the sale except at the courthouse door, and that he handed the other advertisements to third parties, who do not testify that they posted them at all. Although the law presumes that the commissioner did his duty, yet, having testified that he did not post the advertisements as required by the decree, the burden shifted to the purchaser to show that the advertisements were posted in accordance with the directions of the judgment of sale, and having failed to do this, his bid was properly rejected and the commissioner’s report set aside, the land having sold for only three-fifths of its proved value, under an erroneous decree rendered on constructive service had by warning order made in pursuance of an affidavit sworn to before a private person who had gone out of office. The defendants who were warned to appear were nonresidents. See Civil Code 1876, § 57, subsec. 2, and § 58; Commonwealth v. Clark, 1 Bibb. (Ky.) 531.