Court Opinion

ID: 5547850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 21:22:28.427988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:58.110449
License: Public Domain

The Chancellor.
The decision of the vice chancellor in this case is beyond all doubt correct. This is not a bill of , discovery, but a bill for relief; as it contains a general prayer to that effect. The proper course therefore for the defendant is to obtain orders to produce witnesses and to close the proofs, and to bring the cause to a hearing in the usual manner. If it then turns out that the complainant is not entitled to any decree against the defendant, and that his bill was improperly filed as a bill for relief, he will of course be decreed to pay the whole costs of the litigation. Whether it is possible for the complainant to make out by evidence a case which will entitle him to any relief upon this bill is a question not necessary now to determine. (See 8 Price, 522.)
*326The order of the vice chancellor must be affirmed with costs; and the case must be remitted back to him that such further proceedings may be had in the cause as may be necessary.