Court Opinion

ID: 1030495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:15:14.294305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:39.364523
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-6226

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

JAMES LOUIS RIDDICK, a/k/a Fishman,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.   Terrence W.
Boyle, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00014-BO-4)

Submitted:    October 15, 2009              Decided:   October 19, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Louis Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

             James Louis Riddick appeals the district court’s order

denying   his    motion     for    reduction      of    sentence    pursuant   to    18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).            We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error.              Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.                   United States v. Riddick, No.

2:95-cr-00014-BO-4 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2009).                       We dispense with

oral   argument     because       the     facts   and    legal     contentions      are

adequately      presented    in     the    materials      before    the   court     and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED

                                            2