Court Opinion

ID: 5256031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:28:11.098358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:00.747536
License: Public Domain

Page, J.:
The accounting of the removed trustees has been recently before this court. We then considered the objections filed by the plaintiff herein to the accounts. The surrogate had' approved the accounts with a very slight modification, and we surcharged the account by one small item; otherwise we *187found that although very serious objections had been made, they were entirely unfounded. (Matter of Baudouine, 189 App. Div. 934.) The trustees have been removed in this case on the most flimsy evidence. There was absolutely nothing proved against their management of the estate. There was no evidence of any character "produced against Charles A. Baudouine. Nevertheless, the decision was that he should be removed. There was no dereliction of duty proved against John F. Baudouine, nor was it shown that he had been unfaithful in any way, shape or manner to his trust. The sole evidence produced tended to show that John F. Baudouine was insolvent; that he had filed a petition in bankruptcy, and that he had left unpaid certain obligations which it is claimed were owed either by him personally or by bis former copartnership. Stress is laid upon the relation between the plaintiff, who is the daughter of John F. Baudouine, and himself. It has not been shown that this hostility in any way militated against the interest of the plaintiff or that John F. Baudouine had been influenced in any manner in the discharge of his trust by such feeling of hostility.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.
Dowling, Laughlin, Merrell and Philbin, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Settle order on notice.