Court Opinion

ID: 1021852
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:13:08.645234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:14.188689
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Lamont Vincent Pollard appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, finding certain real property subject to forfeiture, and the court’s order denying Pollard’s motion to stay and to alter/amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Pollard,
  
  No. 1:05-cv-01531-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2006; June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.