Court Opinion

ID: 996243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:48:11.133981+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:35.308600
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TODD MAURICE HAYES,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-93-12, CA-97-365-3)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Roosevelt Dues, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appel-
lant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Hayes, Nos. CR-93-12; CA-97-365-3 (S.D.W. Va. Nov.

25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2