Court Opinion

ID: 4308582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-30 14:27:39.570042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:03.049185
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                              _________________
                               NO. 09-18-00286-CV
                              _________________

                        IN RE TEXAS POOL GUY, LLC

________________________________________________________________________

                              Original Proceeding
                317th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. C-227,217-B
________________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Texas Pool Guy, LLC petitions for a writ of mandamus through which it

seeks to compel the trial court to vacate orders that require production of records of

a financial institution for in camera inspection and deny a request for a protective

order. On July 30, 2018, we stayed the production of records while we considered

the mandamus petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). Community Bank of Texas,

N.A. and Courtney Hudson filed responses.

      A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only to correct

a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal.

                                          1
See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding). After considering the parties’ arguments and examining the documents

contained in the appendices in the petition, the responses, and the reply to the

response, we conclude that the relator has not established that it is entitled to

mandamus relief. Accordingly, we lift our stay order of July 30, 2018, and deny the

petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

      PETITION DENIED.

                                                         PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 9, 2018
Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                         2