Court Opinion

ID: 9537448
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 07:18:27.729181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:41.638685
License: Public Domain

Ringold, J.
(concurring)—There are genuine issues of material fact extant here: (1) whether the 13-year-old boys were competent to be entrusted with the flares; (2) whether the flares are inherently dangerous instrumentalities, and (3) whether misuse of the flares was reasonably foreseeable thus imposing a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
I therefore concur in the result.
Callow, C.J., concurs with Ringold, J.
Reconsideration denied September 8 and 16, 1980.
Review denied by Supreme Court November 21, 1980.