Court Opinion

ID: 34737
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:19:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:18.545431
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 95-60508

                           Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

PHILLIP DEAN FLEMING,
                                               Defendant-Appellant.

             Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Mississippi
                             (3:94-CR-110)

                               July 22, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Phillip Dean Fleming appeals from the judgment of the district

court sentencing him to 465 months imprisonment.             Fleming pled

guilty to a three-count indictment charging him with knowingly

kidnapping     and   holding   in    interstate   commerce    for   sexual

exploitation a 8-year-old girl in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201; 2)

using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of

violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1); and, 3) knowingly

possessing a firearm as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.

     *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
§ 922(g)(1).   Over Fleming's objection, the district court applied

the two-level sentencing enhancement from U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(b)(4)(B)

for where the victim sustained a "serious bodily injury."

     On appeal, Fleming argues that the district court's finding

that the girl sustained a serious bodily injury--psychological

trauma--is clearly erroneous.        According to Fleming, the district

court improperly based its finding on the Pre-Sentence Report's

description of interviews with the girl conducted by FBI Special

Agent Margaret Carmichael and Department of Human Services worker

June Chandler.    Relying on United States v. Fawbush, 946 F.2d 584

(8th Cir. 1991), Fleming contends that Carmichael's and Chandler's

opinions    regarding   the     girl's      psychological   well-being        are

insufficient to support the district court's finding without a

corroborating opinion by a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist.

We disagree.

     United States v. Anderson, 5 F.3d 795, 804-05 (5th Cir. 1993),

cert.   denied,   114 S. Ct. 1118       (1994),   disposes   of    Fleming's

argument.    In that case, the defendant claimed that the victim's

own statement of her condition was insufficient to justify the

district    court's   finding   of   extreme     psychological       trauma   for

purposes of an upward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.3.                       Like

Fleming, the defendant relied upon Fawbush to claim that the

government's failure to produce testimony from a counselor or

psychologist barred the upward departure.             We disagreed, holding

that the victim's own description of her psychological well-being

sufficed.    We explained:

                                       2
          In our case, however, unlike either Fawbush or Lara,
     the district court had before it a detailed letter from
     the victim describing the events in question and their
     significant effects on her life.            This letter
     demonstrates substantial changes in [the victim's]
     psychological and behavioral functioning. None of this
     was rebutted. While some testimony by a counselor or
     other expert in psychology would certainly be of value in
     determining this issue, such evidence is not always a
     prerequisite for a section 5K2.3, p.s. departure.

Id. at 805 (citation omitted).    A fortiori, the district court need

not rely on expert testimony in order to apply § 2A3.1(b)(4)(B),

which only requires evidence of a "serious bodily injury" and not

"extreme" psychological injury.

     We are persuaded that the record supports the district court's

finding that the girl suffered a serious bodily injury.          Both

Carmichael and Chandler concluded that the girl sustained and

continues to suffer severe psychological after-effects as a result

of her ordeal.    The gruesome facts of this heinous crime confirm

their conclusions. No expert testimony is necessary to corroborate

the obvious:     that a 8-year-old girl abducted from her school,

transported hundreds of miles away, and forced to perform sexual

acts upon the defendant would suffer serious psychological injury.

     AFFIRMED.

                                   3