Court Opinion

ID: 4356946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-08 20:00:39.936376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:44.310674
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-1892

TERRIDA MONROE,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

VICTORIA FIRE & CASUALTY,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00425-JAG)

Submitted: November 19, 2018                                      Decided: January 8, 2019

Before MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrida Monroe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Terrida Monroe appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Monroe’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the

district court’s disposition, Monroe has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved

in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

       We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                            AFFIRMED

                                             2