Court Opinion

ID: 989743
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:11:18.095704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:42.203954
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6139

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EUNICE ARNETTA HARRIS SPARKS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-92-179)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                  Decided:   July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eunice Arnetta Harris Sparks, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick
Mebane, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Caro-
lina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her

motion to modify her sentence so that she will be transferred to

the institution of her choice. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Sparks, No. CR-92-179 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2