Court Opinion

ID: 8461991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:14:51.279734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.021607
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Jose Garcia-Cardenas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Cardenas’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
We remand the case to the district court' with instructions that it delete from the judgment the erroneous reference to a finding that Garcia-Cardenas waived his right to appeal or to collaterally attack the judgment. See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000); United States v. Garcia-Cardenas, 555 F.3d 1049, 1051 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.