Court Opinion

ID: 8674630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:25:21.827149+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:23.780164
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Zonta Tavaras Ellison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for judgment of acquittal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ellison seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.