Court Opinion

ID: 7018749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 04:32:16.992604+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:10:29.054047
License: Public Domain

(UNPUBLISHED)
PER CURIAM.
Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing without prejudice his pro se civil rights complaint against numerous defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®, (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.