Court Opinion

ID: 9569758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:17:06.792516+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:56.321614
License: Public Domain

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice
(concurring in part):
I concur in part I of the majority opinion. I call the reader’s attention to the fact that this ease arose before the 1990 enactment of the Utah Fit Premises Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 57-22-1 to -6, in 1990, and we have not addressed in this opinion the effect of that legislation on the issues presented by this case.
I express no opinion on part II of Justice Durham’s opinion since it appears to me that it is not necessary to consider the UCSPA to give the tenant the relief to which she is entitled.
HALL, C.J., and STEWART, J., concur in the concurring opinion of HOWE, A.C.J.