Court Opinion

ID: 8629499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:35:25.724536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:42.277862
License: Public Domain

THE COURT
(nem. eon.) quashed the execution in' this case, because the supersedeas judgment, upon which it was issued, was hot confessed until after the expiration of Lwo months after the original judgment. See the following cases heretofore decided by this court, namely, Hodgson y. Mountz, at December term, 1806 [Case No. 6,509]; Smith v. Middleton, April term, 1821 [Id. 13,079]; Mandeville v. Love, October term, 1S21 [Id. 9,012]; McSherry v. Queen, April term, 1823 [Id. 8,926]; Holmes v. Bussard, April term, 1823 [Id. 6,630]; and Thomas v. Elliot, Octo-oer term, 1S23 [Id. 13,896].