Court Opinion

ID: 9508544
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 21:33:43.852004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:34.203498
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE GULBRANDSON,
specially concurring:
I concur with the result expressed in the majority opinion but I do not concur with all that is stated therein. I specifically do not concur with the comments that the verbatim questions to the investigating patrolman, and his answers thereto, constitute prejudicial error against the plaintiff. Although the questions may have been objectionable, no objection was made by plaintiff’s counsel to any of the questions. I would not treat the motion to strike the witness’s answer as an objection to the question asked.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TURNAGE joins in the foregoing concurrence of MR. JUSTICE GULBRANDSON.