Court Opinion

ID: 3076537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:20:31.194722+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:00.310588
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                       Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

                              _________________
                               NO. 09-13-00229-CV
                              _________________

        IN RE REGINALD STEVENSON AND DIANE STEVENSON

________________________________________________________________________

                               Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      After J.B.B.’s father was committed to mental health services and his mother

died, J.B.B. was removed by a court order obtained by the Department of Family

and Protective Services and subsequently placed with intervening relatives.

J.B.B.’s maternal grandparents petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial

court to vacate its order of May 6, 2013, and grant their motion to strike the

intervention filed by the real parties in interest with whom J.B.B. currently resides.

See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 102.003 (West Supp. 2012). After reviewing the

petition for writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real parties in interest,

                                          1
we conclude the relators are not entitled to relief. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §

102.004 (West 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

      PETITION DENIED.

                                                      PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 24, 2013
Opinion Delivered June 13, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                       2