Court Opinion

ID: 9351711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-03 14:08:26.614261+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:26.404902
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                        San Antonio, Texas

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                            No. 04-22-00819-CR

                                        IN RE Ross HENDRICKS

                                             Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On December 7, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented

by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906

S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means

relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review.

See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                                         PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CR11156, styled State of Texas v. Ross Hendricks, pending in the 144th
Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.