Court Opinion

ID: 8877315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 19:30:53.41117+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:06:26.324436
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction is affirmed. It is clear that the issuance of the requested injunction would result in greater harm to the defendants than the harm which plaintiff would suffer by reason of failure to issue the injunction. See Schenker v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 304 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962); Nalco Chemical Co. v. Hall, 347 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1965).