Court Opinion

ID: 8675817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:59:44.122965+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.890328
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Ulep, No. 1:14-cv-00055-LO-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 10, 2014; entered Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.