Court Opinion

ID: 988909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:59:23.181931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.894585
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-6715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

THADDIUS CEDEWA RHAMES,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-93-69, CA-94-533-2)

Submitted:   March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddius Cedewa Rhames, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Mebane,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rhames, Nos.
CR-93-69; CA-94-533-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2