Court Opinion

ID: 3388615
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:46:25.713278+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:04.293043
License: Public Domain

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed as to Pelchat and reversed as to Bethel and Boyle, while Mr. Presiding Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed. *Page 664 
Affirmed.
WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, J.J., concur.
                    ON REHEARING HAD MARCH 18, 1936.