Court Opinion

ID: 657650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:56:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:11.385549
License: Public Domain

9 F.3d 1544
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Helen C. MANZO, Widow of Philip R. Manzo, Petitioner,v.DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.
No. 93-1101.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 27, 1993.Decided:  November 12, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
Helen C. Manzo, Petitioner Pro Se.
Marta Kusic, Staff Attorney, Nancy Grace Feeney, Unites States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Helen C. Manzo seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992).  Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.  Manzo v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 87-3240-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 30, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED