Court Opinion

ID: 4889279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-02 23:47:39.172961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:49.606488
License: Public Domain

Roberts, J.
The petition of the trustee for intervention states that there were other creditors of Jones besides Catón & Catón, who had attached the trust property, the proceeds of *789which, Moseley prayed, should be decreed to him to permit him to carry out the trust. On the trial this important fact was not proved. It was important in this case, because the deed of trust did not show who were creditors ; and because Moseley did not avail himself of his legal remedies, (when the attachment was levied, and the property taken out of his hands,) by a direct suit for it, or by taking the oath and giving bond, necessary to make a direct claim to the property. Avoiding such responsibilities, as he must have incurred, by a direct assertion of his legal rights, he sought the equitable interposition of the Court in his behalf. He neglected to place himself in a position to claim his remedy as matter of right, and could only claim it on equitable grounds. A Court of Equity Will never impede the diligent creditor in the regular pursuit of his rights, unless it can be shown that some one else has equal rights, or may be injured by it; which was not attempted in this case. Moseley claimed no interest in the property himself, except for the purpose of paying Jones’ debts generally ; and he did not show that there were any other such debts as alleged. It was not to be expected that the attaching creditor would assume to prove a negative, that there were none such.
If there were no other debts, this was a useless interference, which a Court of Equity will not aid.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.