Court Opinion

ID: 7386564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 00:21:20.071411+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:21:33.067381
License: Public Domain

By the Court
Possession alone is sufficient to maintain this action against a wrong-doer, and as such the defendants are charged. The gift of of the action is a nusance committed by them upon land in the plaintiff’s possession ; and as all averments beyond this are immaterial and not put in issue in this action, they need not be proved. The case cited is of a variance in the description of a contract ; and the cases therein referred to as warranting the decision of the court, cannot fairly be extended beyond those cases where records, or written contracts are set forth in the declaration : these, if stated at all, ought to be stated truly. The possession here is the ground of the action, and had that been described in any particular way, as derived under lease for years or otherwise, the proof ought to have corresponded with the allegation, but as the Seisin of the plaintiff is altogether impertinent, it need not be proved. The plaintiff had a verdict.