Court Opinion

ID: 3621860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 00:03:29.171915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:05.691637
License: Public Domain

This motion is based on the ground that the application to the Appellate Division for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals in this case was not made in due time. Under section 1310 of the Code of Civil Procedure service of notice of entry of the judgment of affirmance upon the appellant is necessary to set the time running within which the application for leave to appeal must be made in a case specified in subdivision 2 of section 191 — and this is such a case, being an action to recover damages for a personal injury. It was conceded on the application to the chief judge that no notice of the entry of the judgment of affirmance had ever been served. The language used by CHASE, J., writing for the court in Terwilliger v. Browning, King  Co. (207 N.Y. 479, 482) does not apply to a case of this kind. He said: "It will be seen that the limitation upon the time in which the Appellate Division can allow an appeal is in no way controlled or affected by the service of the order from which an appeal is desired to be taken either with or without notice of the entry thereof." The language was used with reference to appeals which can be allowed only by the Appellate Division and in respect to which a judge of the Court of Appeals has no power of allowance whatever. Section 1310 of the Code was not mentioned, nor *Page 712 
was there any occasion to refer to it in a case of that character. It has express application, however, to a case like the present, arising under subdivision 2 of section 191 and to ignore it would be to disregard the plain direction of a statute which it was competent for the legislature to enact.
The motion should be denied. No costs.
WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ., concur.
Motion denied.