Court Opinion

ID: 1008320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:38:14.830657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:35.512494
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  John D. Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Ac
   
   *951
   
  cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Simpson v. Supreme Court Judge,
  
  No. CA-01-538-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2002; Apr. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.