Court Opinion

ID: 1003264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:23:50.43225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:11.849569
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6197

JAIME TRAVERSO, SR.,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99-
2480-MJG)

Submitted:   November 22, 2000            Decided:   January 5, 2001

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime Traverso, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jaime Traverso, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and affirm the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Traverso v. Sondervan, No. CA-99-

2480-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2000); see Artuz v. Bennett, 121 S. Ct.

361, 364 (2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2