Court Opinion

ID: 6939562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:58:25.120578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:39.025673
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was indicted on two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The first count charged that he committed the crime as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network, but the second count did not. The court overruled defendant’s demurrer and alternative motion to strike, which alleged that the scheme or network language was unconstitutionally vague. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). In a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted only on count 2 of the indictment.
Defendant’s only assignment of error is based on our decision in Moeller. Because he was convicted only on count 2, which did not allege participation in a scheme or network, the assignment of error is moot.
Affirmed.