Court Opinion

ID: 8422641
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 22:50:33.310601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:26.199199
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bowman v. Haynes, 282 F.Supp.2d 488 (N.D.W. Va.2003). Bowman’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED