Court Opinion

ID: 569647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:01.283389
License: Public Domain

946 F.2d 889
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Steve WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Charles M. CREECY;  Edward Jerry Earls;  Dennis Lucas;William Carroll, Jr.;  Lesley Gutrell;  BillyBass;  Kenneth Larnier, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.Decided Oct. 18, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.  (CA-91-432-CRT-F)
Steve Wilson, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Steve Wilson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Wilson v. Creecy, No. CA-91-432-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Jul. 18, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.