Court Opinion

ID: 8454117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:53:25.045053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.271509
License: Public Domain

*509Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Langston appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Langston, No. 3:03-cr-00394-JRS-26 (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.