Court Opinion

ID: 9705447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 01:06:35.913193+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:10.920190
License: Public Domain

*535Kelly, J.
(dissenting). The motion for reconsideration presents nothing new to recommend it. A motion for reconsideration “which merely presents the same issues ruled on by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted.” MCR 2.119(F)(3). Given that the motion merely presents the same material already before us when the majority denied leave to appeal, I would deny it. The prosecution has failed, as the court rule requires, to “demonstrate a palpable error by which the court and the parties have been misled and show that a different disposition of the motion must result from correction of the error.” MCR 2.119(F)(3).
Cavanagh, J., concurred with Kelly, J.