Court Opinion

ID: 9367749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-01 20:05:52.702295+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:04.163029
License: Public Domain

People v Morocho (2023 NY Slip Op 00441)

People v Morocho

2023 NY Slip Op 00441

Decided on February 1, 2023

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 1, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2020-01030

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJose Gabriel Jimenez Morocho, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1641/19)

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill of counsel; Yasmine Subtyl on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eugene M. Guarino, J.), imposed October 25, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, ZAYAS and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court