Court Opinion

ID: 5805888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 18:37:11.668703+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:42.911511
License: Public Domain

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Hancock, J. The case is distinguishable from Rabetoy v Atkinson (49 AD2d 691) (see, Marco v Sachs, 10 NY2d 542 and Orloff Towers v Vermilya-Brown Co., 50 AD2d 740). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court denying motion to dismiss medical malpractice action.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.