Court Opinion

ID: 2961894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:49:29.866005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:07.095718
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          May 11, 1993                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 92-2442        No. 92-2443                                 ELIESABETH A. AMELUNG,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                     MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                 ____________________                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]                                            ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                              Torruella, Cyr and Boudin,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            Eliesabeth A. Amelung on briefs pro se.            _____________________            Mary M.  Logalbo, Joseph A. Trainor,  and Jonathan  P. Feltner, on            ________________  _________________       ____________________        Motions  for Summary Disposition  and Memoranda in  Support of Motions        for Summary Disposition, for appellee.                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.   Plaintiff has appealed from  November                      __________            13, 1992 orders granting  the government's motions to dismiss            Medicare-Medicaid   and   other   federal   defendants   from            plaintiff's  actions.   We  affirm  the  orders of  dismissal            essentially  for  the  reasons  stated  in  the  governments'            motions  to  dismiss.   To  the  extent plaintiff  challenges            earlier district court orders dismissing plaintiff's actions,            we adhere to our earlier decisions.  Amelung v. M.B.T.A., No.                                                 _______    ________            91-1329,  slip  op.  (1st Cir.  June  27,  1991);  Amelung v.                                                               _______            M.B.T.A., No. 91-1336, slip op. (1st Cir. June 28, 1991).            ________                      Affirmed.                      ________