Court Opinion

ID: 659804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:05:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:46.425680
License: Public Domain

12 F.3d 1110
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John Wesley WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-10199.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 1993.*Decided Dec. 1, 1993.

Before:  SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
John Wesley Williams appeals his conviction and 115-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to interference with commerce by threats or violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1951.  Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams' counsel filed both a brief stating that she finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3