Court Opinion

ID: 2540758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:16:31.047589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:37.805464
License: Public Domain

345 S.W.3d 401 (2011)
Courtland REED, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95323.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
August 16, 2011.
Brocca Smith, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., James B. Farnsworth, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Courtland Reed appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed *402 the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).