Court Opinion

ID: 9825211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 12:18:47.307931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:21.791674
License: Public Domain

Upon Rehearing.
Counsel for appellant contend on motion for a rehearing that we have erroneously held that paragraph 7 of the bill was not subject to demurrer, in that it failed to charge fraud or bad faith on the part of Mrs. Carothers. It may be that the original opinion is inaccurate in holding that paragraph 7, in and of itself, is sufficient, but, when taken in connection with the entire bill, especially paragraph 5, we think the objection raised by the demurrer is overcome.
Rehearing denied.
SAYRE, BROAYN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.