Court Opinion

ID: 2931145
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:05:28.286689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:02.008868
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2005.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
_______________
 
NO. 14-04-00471-CR
_______________
 
STEPHEN FREDRICK BLACK, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
______________________________________________
 
On Appeal from the 212th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 00CR0664
______________________________________________
 
M E M O R A N D U M  
O P I N I O N
 

Stephen
Frederick Black appeals the revocation of his post-conviction community
supervision on the ground that he was unable to comply with the conditions for
which his probation was revoked due to indigence and lack of transportation.  Appellant=s brief does not state a standard of
review or recognized ground for reversal of a judgment, and does not challenge
the sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he failed to comply with his
probation conditions.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38(h).  To the extent he is challenging the factual
sufficiency of the evidence supporting the revocation, his testimony that he
was unable to comply with conditions does not greatly outweigh the evidence in
the record that transportation was, in fact, available to him.  See, e.g., Vodochodsky v. State, 158
S.W.3d 502, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 
Because appellant=s sole issue thus affords no basis for relief, it is
overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
/s/        Richard H. Edelman
Justice
 
Judgment rendered
and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2005.
Panel consists of
Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex.
R. App. P. 47.2(b).