Court Opinion

ID: 500970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:53:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:12.047274
License: Public Domain

838 F.2d 467Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Harry Hoffman NADOLSKI, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-7251.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 1987.Decided Jan. 27, 1988.

Harry Hoffman Nadolski, appellant pro se.
Ann Elizabeth Singleton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge.  (C/A No. 86-3605-B).
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit.  Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Nadolski v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 86-3605-B (D.Md. July 1, 1987).

2
DISMISSED.