Court Opinion

ID: 682004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:40:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:20.408679
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1179
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Maurice Cortez PROCTOR, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6437.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 1994.Decided Nov. 1, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.
Maurice Cortez Proctor, appellant pro se.
Catherine Curtis Blake, Peter M. Semel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for return of property.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Proctor, No. CR-85-547-Y (D. Md. Mar. 28, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.