Court Opinion

ID: 624919
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-03-08 19:59:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:07.498651
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

  Wniteb ~tate~ 542 U.S. 367,
380-81 (2004).

    Mr. Davis has not shown that the minimal delay here
justifies the drastic remedy of a writ of mandamus sought
in either of his two mandamus petitions.

    Accordingly,

    IT Is ORDERED THAT:

    (1) The petitions for a writ of mandamus are denied.
    (2) Mr. Davis's request for other various relief is
denied.
    (3) The Secretary's motion is denied as moot.
INREDAVIS                                                    4

                                  FOR THE COURT

   MAR 08 2012                     /s/ Jan Horbaly
       Date                       Jan Horbaly
                                  Clerk

cc: Harold Ven-Noy Davis
    Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq.
    Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
Claims
s25                                                 FILED
                                           U.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
                                              THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

                                              'MAR   (j   8 ZOlZ
                                                 JANHORBALY
                                                    ClBIK