Court Opinion

ID: 9746111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 13:59:43.741708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:08.847772
License: Public Domain

YEGAN, J.
On petition for rehearing, William contends that he was first eligible to retire in 1987, and not in 1989 as found by the trial court. He claims that the monthly payment ordered should be based upon his rate of *1613pay in 1987 which would result in an approximate $200 per month reduction. William asks that we receive evidence on appeal and appends a copy of a letter from the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System to the effect that he was first eligible to retire on September 22, 1987.
Somewhere along the line, litigation must cease.  A reviewing court has discretion to grant or deny a motion to receive evidence on appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 909; Monsan Homes, Inc. v. Pogrebneak (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 826, 830 [258 Cal.Rptr. 676].) The request is denied.
We also observe that even if William was first eligible to retire in 1987, the amount of payments would not decrease by approximately $200 per month as claimed.
Stone (S. J.), P. J., and Gilbert, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing was denied February 25, 1992.