Court Opinion

ID: 9919226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-17 19:00:30.555485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:33.583847
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10669         Document: 00517034623             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/17/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 23-10669
                                                                                       FILED
                                                                                 January 17, 2024
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Alexis Nicole Pacheco,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:22-CR-136-4
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Alexis Nicole Pacheco has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Pacheco has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10669    Document: 00517034623          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/17/2024

                                  No. 23-10669

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2