Court Opinion

ID: 3558371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:09:08.920172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:45.389821
License: Public Domain

We conclude that the bill shows sufficient equity to justify its retention; and that is the only question before us at this time. *Page 423 
Certain ad interim restraint was awarded, but the order of the court of chancery in that regard is not before us, and we express no opinion on it.
The order under review is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.