Court Opinion

ID: 9805555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 18:01:47.497658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:45:53.848163
License: Public Domain

GROSS, J.,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I concur in the majority’s conclusion a new trial is required on the issue of code upgrade damages.
I dissent from the majority’s construction of the insurance policy. My reading of the “Amount of Insurance” section of Endorsement # 2 is that it falls under section 2.c. of the “Occurrence Limit of Liability” provision of the policy. The limitations of the policy were $2,500,000 per occurrence and a total amount of coverage of $8,000,000 for the building, $2,000,000 for the contents, and $1,382,368 for business income.