Court Opinion

ID: 5775476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:40:12.469216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:52.424763
License: Public Domain

In an action to recover damages for economic losses incurred as a result of the defendant’s alleged negligent inspection of the plaintiffs motor vehicle following an accident, the defendant appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), entered June 27, 2008, which, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff alleges that he sustained economic loss as a result of the negligent inspection of his truck, which was damaged in an accident, by the defendant, his insurer. The plaintiff contends that if the defendant had properly declared the vehicle a total loss upon its original inspection, instead of directing that it be repaired, he could have avoided certain losses, including loss of business and the cost of repairs and of obtaining replacement vehicles during the months while his vehicle was being repaired.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant did not establish, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Disputes as to the facts surrounding the alleged losses preclude the granting of summary judgment, particularly at the pre-discovery stage.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Frudenti, P.J., Santucci, Florio and Belen, JJ., concur.