Court Opinion

ID: 9380586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-20 17:00:52.87559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:26.317177
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAR 20 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA LUCRECIA LOPEZ-LOPEZ,                    No.    20-73772

                Petitioner,                     Agency No. A201-293-735

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,

                Respondent.

                     On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                         Board of Immigration Appeals

                              Submitted March 14, 2023**

Before:      SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

      Sandra Lucrecia Lopez-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision to terminate removal proceedings.

We dismiss the petition for review.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      Because an order terminating removal proceedings is not a final order of

removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider Lopez-Lopez’s petition for review. See

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1); Lopez v. Garland, 40 F.4th 996, 1000 (9th Cir. 2022)

(“[T]he termination of [petitioner’s] removal proceedings was not itself a final

order of removal, and our jurisdiction is limited to such orders.”); see also 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(9) (“Judicial review of all questions of law and fact . . . shall be

available only in judicial review of a final order [of removal].”).

      The temporary stay of removal is lifted.

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

                                           2                                     20-73772