Court Opinion

ID: 591483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:49:38.935417
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 658
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-8141.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 3, 1992.

Bruce Maloy, Maloy & Jenkins, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
James T. Martin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia;  Marvin H. Schoob, Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity.  United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir.1992);  United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d 51, 53 (8th Cir.1992);  United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991);  United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991);  United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir.1990);  United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1990).

2
We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.

3
AFFIRMED.