Court Opinion

ID: 9766934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:03:37.403161+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:26.610561
License: Public Domain

STORCKMAN, P. J.,
concurs in separate concurring opinion filed; EAGER, J., concurs in part and concurs in result in part in separate opinion filed; LEEDY, J., concurs in paragraph one of the opinion and the result, and concurs in the separate opinion of EAGER, J., believing that Boldizs (by changing his version of the solicitation by Mrs. Kinne to do away with her husband so as to characterize such solicitation as having been made “in a joking way” and from which change the trial court could have fairly inferred an effort and purpose on the part of the witness to suppress the truth) had become subject to cross-examination for the purpose of impeachment.