Court Opinion

ID: 2993724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 20:08:50.451595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:02.105047
License: Public Domain

Matter of Wenger (2015 NY Slip Op 06923)

Matter of Wenger

2015 NY Slip Op 06923

Decided on September 23, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Per Curiam

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 23, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

2014-05996

[*1]In the Matter of Dov Barry Wenger, admitted as Dov B. Wenger, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, petitioner; Dov Barry Wenger, respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 3040938)

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 20, 2001.

Gary L. Casella, White Plains, N.Y. (Faith Lorenzo of counsel), for petitioner.

PER CURIAM

OPINION & ORDER
.By decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 4, 2015, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l)(1)(i) based upon his failure to cooperate with the lawful demands of the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District in an investigation of a complaint of professional misconduct. Further, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, based upon a verified petition dated June 16, 2014. That petition, which was personally served upon the respondent on July 3, 2014, contains 18 charges alleging, among other things, that the respondent is guilty of misappropriating funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary, commingling business and/or personal funds with funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary, failing to maintain and make available bookkeeping records for his attorney IOLA account, engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness as a lawyer by failing to cooperate with the Grievance Committee, and breaching his duty to a former client by representing another client in a substantially related matter that was adverse to his former client.
The respondent was directed to serve and file an answer to the verified petition dated June 16, 2014, within 20 days after service upon him of the decision and order on motion dated February 4, 2015, and the issues raised by the verified petition, and any answer thereto, were referred to the Honorable Jerome Becker, as Special Referee, to hear and report.
On February 23, 2015, the Grievance Committee served a copy of this Court's decision and order on motion dated February 4, 2015, upon the respondent, and an affidavit of service was duly filed on March 2, 2015. Upon the respondent's request, the Court granted him an extension until April 15, 2015, to file an answer. Notwithstanding being afforded a further extension by the Court until May 5, 2015, to date, the respondent has failed to serve and file an answer to the verified petition dated June 16, 2014, as directed.
The Grievance Committee now moves to deem the charges against the respondent [*2]established, and to impose such discipline upon him as this Court deems appropriate, based upon his default. Although the motion papers were served upon the respondent on May 12, 2015, he has neither opposed the instant motion, nor interposed any response thereto.
Accordingly, the Grievance Committee's motion is granted, the charges in the verified petition dated June 16, 2014, are deemed established and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the Grievance Committee's motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Dov Barry Wenger, admitted as Dov B. Wenger, a suspended attorney, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent, Dov Barry Wenger, admitted as Dov B. Wenger, shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see  22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Dov Barry Wenger, admitted as Dov B. Wenger, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Dov Barry Wenger, admitted as Dov B. Wenger has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f).
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court