Court Opinion

ID: 9813616
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 23:12:19.439532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:30:06.608989
License: Public Domain

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
No. 3237. Decided Nov. 7, 1940.
BY THE COURT:
This matter now comes before the Court upon the application for rehearing. The objections as set out in the application seem to be addressed to the form of the opinion rather than to the substance of the judgment.
We have carefully gone over all the matters presented. We have also reread and restudied the opinion. There may be some inconsequential misstatements in the opinion, but it is not difficult to discern the questions that were being considered by the Court and were ultimately determined.
We do not believe that any good purpose would be served by granting the application, as counsel for appellant has not advanced anything in his application that would give us ground for receding from our former conclusion.
Application for rehearing denied.
HORNBECK, PJ., GEIGER & BARNES, JJ., concur.