Court Opinion

ID: 9459351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:18:16.373074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:36:07.913785
License: Public Domain

TRASK, Circuit Judge
(dissenting):
Were I deciding this case as an original question I would write much as the author of the majority has done. However, as a diversity case to be decided according to the law of Arizona, I am unable to distinguish it from Malanga v. Royal Indemnity Co., 101 Ariz. 588, 422 P.2d 704 (1967), and United American Life Insurance Co. v. Beadel, 13 Ariz. App. 196, 475 P.2d 288 (1970). Those decisions appear to me to require reversal.