Court Opinion

ID: 988700
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:55:54.439616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:26.723457
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7788

HERMAN W. HARDY,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; D. STUART, Nurse of
C.M.S.,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-94-3038-B)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman W. Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, KRAMON
& GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Hardy v. Smith, No. CA-94-3038-B (D. Md. Sept. 29, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2