Court Opinion

ID: 9490839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 13:56:03.412433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:54:20.755069
License: Public Domain

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge,
Amended Dissent:
The dissent is amended at Slip Op. page 10794 [123 F.3d at 1281], paragraph 2, line 2, after “district court.”, by inserting the following footnote (renumbering subsequent footnotes. accordingly):
Paradoxically, the majority also repudiates the district court’s reasoning. Maj. op. at 10792 [123 F.3d at 1280]. How one can defer to and, at the same time, reject the district court’s reasoning is a lesson I missed in judges school.