Court Opinion

ID: 5872523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 01:50:28.526734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:45.537865
License: Public Domain

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Although petitioner requests that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the tier III hearing, inmates do not have a constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status (see Matter of Hamilton v Bezio, 93 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2012]; *770Matter of Applegate v Fischer, 89 AD 3d 1303, 1304 [2011]). Thus, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kalwasinski v Fischer, 92 AD3d 1069, 1069-1070 [2012]).
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.