Court Opinion

ID: 9791867
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:19:40.620101+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:54.520209
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Presiding Judge
(concurring):
I concur with Judge NIX in the decision in this case. The facts of this case distinguish it from Ryan v. State, Okl.Cr., 473 P.2d 322, rendered 7-1-70, in that both alleged incidents were committed at the same moment of time and at exactly the same place. In Ryansupra, the elements of time and place for the two offenses were entirely different. It is also important to observe that the prosecutor was fully aware of the possibility of two offenses existing when the first charge was filed;, he made his election of charges at that time which is binding on the state.