Court Opinion

ID: 66773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:14:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:56.793411
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                            June 16, 2009
                                     No. 08-40956
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WALLACE MCDONALD ASCENCIO

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:08-CR-302-ALL

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wallace McDonald
Ascencio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ascencio has filed a response.
       Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ascencio’s
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.               Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 08-40956

Ascencio’s motions to proceed pro se on appeal and for the appointment of
substitute counsel are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901,
902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

                                   2