Court Opinion

ID: 5723819
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:13:36.690848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:45.321698
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered November 23, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, declared that plaintiffs waived the attorney-client privilege as to legal advice they received regarding compliance of their Russian operation with Russian tax laws and licensure requirements, affirmed, without costs.
Defendant sufficiently demonstrated that the advice it gave in the course of its allegedly negligent representation was framed, in this malpractice action, as the sole cause of plaintiffs’ injury in Russia. Invasion of the attorney-client privilege is necessary, under these circumstances, to determine the validity of such claims, and is vital to the defense (see Orco Bank v Proteinas Del Pacifico, 179 AD2d 390 [1992]).
We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.