Court Opinion

ID: 9777645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 20:17:58.579368+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:58.054998
License: Public Domain

Opinion on Petition to Rehear
Mr. Justice Creson.
In this case we have been presented a petition to rehear filed on behalf of Carl R. Hastings. Upon consideration we find that this petition constitutes no more than a reargument of those things considered and determined in the original opinion.
Clearly, the above does not conform to the objective purposes of petitions to rehear as enunciated in Rule 32 of the rules of this Court. After consideration, we are of opinion that the petition should be, and the same is denied.
Dyer, Chief Justice, and Chattin, Humphreys and McCanless, Justices, concur.