Court Opinion

ID: 9540695
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:18:58.39238+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:12.194097
License: Public Domain

RATLIFF, Chief Judge,
dissenting.
In Sable v. Sable (1987), Ind.App., 506 N.E.2d 495 (Buchanan, J., dissenting) this court court construed the 1985 amendment to Indiana Code section 31-1-11.5-2 and *234held it to be remedial rather than creating new substantive rights. Being remedial in nature, the amendment properly was applied retrospectively. I believe Sable properly construed the effect and nature of the amendment. It is remedial and should be applied retrospectively. Therefore, this case should be governed by Sable and the judgment should be affirmed.
For the foregoing reasons, I dissent.