Court Opinion

ID: 7612312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 10:29:06.837604+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:55.071170
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the trial court's denial of her motion to reduce or modify her sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court dismissed the motion as untimely. However, the motion was filed within sixty days of the date that this Court issued the mandates in her direct appeals. See Bailey v. State , 136 So.3d 615, 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("[A] rule 3.800(c) motion is considered filed when entrusted to prison officials for further delivery or processing."). As the State concedes, the motion was timely filed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(c).
The trial court's failure to consider Petitioner's rule 3.800(c) motion on the merits was a departure from the essential requirements of law. See Bacchus v. State , 958 So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the order dismissing Petitioner's rule 3.800(c) motion, and remand with directions to consider the motion on its merits.
Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.