Court Opinion

ID: 3084853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:33:41.321506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:44.155311
License: Public Domain

In The
                        Court of Appeals
          Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
                  ______________________________

                        No. 06-11-00105-CV
                  ______________________________

MEL COLEMAN, JR., NICOLE COLEMAN, AND/OR ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS
         1012 ANGIE LANE, DE SOTO, TX 75115, Appellants

                                    V.

   BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I
    LLC, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-HE7, Appellee

             On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
                         Dallas County, Texas
                   Trial Court No. CC-10-08162-A

               Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
                       Opinion by Justice Moseley
                                                  OPINION

          Bank of America, National Association,1 filed a forcible detainer lawsuit in Justice of the

Peace Court of Dallas County, Precinct 4-1,2 seeking a writ of possession evicting Mel Coleman,

Jr., Nicole Coleman, and all other occupants (hereinafter the Colemans) of 1012 Angie Lane,

De Soto, Texas, 75515. When the Colemans failed to file an answer, the justice court entered a

default judgment, ordering that Bank of America “have and recover from [the Colemans] the

premises described . . . .” On November 17, 2010, the Colemans appealed the default judgment to

the Dallas County Court at Law No. 1. On July 28, 2011, the parties signed 3 and entered an

agreed judgment granting possession of the property to Bank of America.                            The Colemans

subsequently filed this appeal.

          On appeal, the Colemans, proceeding pro se, argue that the justice court erred in entering

the default judgment because the complaint filed in the justice court failed to provide proper

notice.

          We affirm the judgment because the Colemans’ argument is moot.

1
 Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for
Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE7,
purchased the property at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale.
2
 Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court
pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005). We are unaware of
any conflict between precedent of the Fifth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 41.3.
3
The agreed judgment is not signed by the parties, but rather, is signed by counsel for Bank of America and the
Colemans.

                                                          2
       In their sole point of error, the Colemans contend that the justice court erred in entering the

default judgment because Bank of America’s complaint failed to provide proper notice.

Specifically, the Colemans contend that the complaint failed to sufficiently describe the property.

We need not reach the merits of the Colemans’ argument because their point of error is moot.

       An appeal from a justice court judgment is tried de novo in the county court. TEX. R. CIV.

P. 574b, 749, 751. Such an appeal is, essentially, a new trial before a different judge. Searcy v.

Sagullo, 915 S.W.2d 595 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ). Accordingly, the

Colemans’ point of error regarding the justice court’s default judgment was rendered moot by the

trial de novo before the county court at law. Because the Colemans failed to raise any point of

error regarding an act or omission by the county court at law, we must overrule the point of error

and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                              Bailey C. Moseley
                                              Justice

Date Submitted:        May 29, 2012
Date Decided:          May 30, 3012

                                                 3