Court Opinion

ID: 1791009
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:27:16.120837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:33.828519
License: Public Domain

712 N.W.2d 759 (2006)
Minh-Phuong T. PHAN, Respondent,
v.
RADISSON HOTEL, and American Compensation Insurance/RTW, Relators.
No. A06-22.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 26, 2006.
Brian James Holly, Asfedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.
Minh-Phuong T. Phan, St. Paul MN, Pro Se Respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc.

ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 6, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice