Court Opinion

ID: 9353895
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-13 01:00:20.982838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:09:49.737045
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10972         Document: 00516609014             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/12/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 21-10972
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               January 12, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Stewart Albert Elizardo,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:19-CR-630-10
                      ______________________________

   Before Davis, Smith, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Stewart Albert Elizardo has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Elizardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 21-10972    Document: 00516609014         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/12/2023

                                 No. 21-10972

   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2