Court Opinion

ID: 182713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-01-14 01:03:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:36.778107
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 10-7373

KAMAL S. MUWWAKKIL,

                Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

GENE M. JOHNSON; LARRY HUFFMAN; JOHN S. GARMAN; LINDA B.
SHEAR;   BRYAN  S.   WATSON;   A.   P.   HARVEY; J.   COMBS;
P. SCARBERRY; J. MCQUEEN, Sergeant; M. MCBRIDE; T. THOMPSON;
BRENDA RAVIZEE; G. ROBINSON; M. HENSLEY,

                Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.       Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu)

Submitted:   December 16, 2010            Decided:   January 13, 2011

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamal S. Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se.       Banci Enga Tewolde,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim     H. Guynn,
Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

               Kamal S. Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                       We

have     reviewed       the     record   and   find   no    reversible    error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.      Muwwakkil v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu (W.D.

Va. Sept. 12, 2010).            We dispense with oral argument because the

facts    and    legal    contentions     are   adequately    presented    in   the

materials      before     the    court   and   argument    would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                         AFFIRMED

                                          2