Court Opinion

ID: 997214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:53:00.216988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:50.512937
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6966

DENNIS GERALD GARDNER,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge; Glen
M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-49, CA-97-758-R)

Submitted:   November 5, 1998          Decided:     November 23, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Gerald Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Albert Lloret,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia; John
Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dennis Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. Gardner v. United States, Nos. CR-96-49; CA-97-758-R

(W.D. Va. June 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2