Court Opinion

ID: 7975170
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 00:59:01.158905+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:53.203600
License: Public Domain

BROWN, J.
Defendant was complained against in the municipal court of the city of Duluth for the violation of an ordinance of the city, and when arrested and brought before the court interposed a general de*432murrer to the complaint. With the consent of the parties, the court, acting under section 5409, ft. L. 1905, certified the questions presented by the demurrer to the district court for determination, and that court in turn certified the questions to this court.
The statute referred to authorizes the district court to certify questions of an important nature to the supreme, court in cases where a conviction has been had in that court, or .when the questions .arise upon demurrer to an indictment. The statute has reference solely to prosecutions in the district court, and does not apply to those commenced in, and which are within the jurisdiction of, municipal courts or courts of justices of the peace. Nor is the statute rendered applicable to the municipal court of Duluth by the provisions of the Duluth charter to the effect that all laws of a general nature shall, so far as applicable, govern and control the proceedings in the municipal court of that city. The statute authorizing the certification- of causes by the district court is by its language limited to proceedings in that court, and does not apply to criminal prosecutions in general. The Duluth charter, therefore, does not render the statute applicable to municipal court proceedings. See State v. Billings, 96 Minn. 533, 104 N. W. 1150.
Proceedings dismissed.