Court Opinion

ID: 9911436
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 21:00:49.431969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:25.667145
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1877      Doc: 14         Filed: 12/18/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-1877

        JEFFREY LYNN ROBERTS,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        DAYMARK RECOVERY SERVICES,                      INC.;   GRANVILLE         COUNTY
        SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00246-D-RJ)

        Submitted: December 14, 2023                                Decided: December 18, 2023

        Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jeffrey Lynn Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Gregory Brook, HALL BOOTH SMITH,
        PC, Charlotte, North Carolina; James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON
        (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1877      Doc: 14        Filed: 12/18/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Jeffery Lynn Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42

        U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find

        no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Roberts v. Daymark

        Recovery Services, Inc., No. 5:23-cv-00246-D-RJ (E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2023). We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2