Court Opinion

ID: 2752411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-18 14:02:02.513005+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:14.675269
License: Public Domain

******************************************************
  The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the
beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will
be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the
date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative
date for the beginning of all time periods for filing
postopinion motions and petitions for certification is
the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion.
In no event will any such motions be accepted before
the ‘‘officially released’’ date.
  All opinions are subject to modification and technical
correction prior to official publication in the Connecti-
cut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the
event of discrepancies between the electronic version
of an opinion and the print version appearing in the
Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Con-
necticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
  The syllabus and procedural history accompanying
the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official
Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service
and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes
of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of
the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be repro-
duced and distributed without the express written per-
mission of the Commission on Official Legal
Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
******************************************************
                  STATE v. COTE—DISSENT

   EVELEIGH, J., concurring and dissenting. I agree
with part II of the majority opinion and join that part
of the opinion. For all of the reasons stated in my con-
currence and dissent in State v. Kalil, 314 Conn. ,
    ,    A.3d      (2014), which address identical issues
as those presented in this case, I respectfully dissent
from part I of the majority opinion. Accordingly, I would
reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court with
instructions to remand the matter to the trial court for
resentencing. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from part
I of the opinion.