Court Opinion

ID: 70088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:55:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:27.718821
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                         December 15, 2009
                                     No. 09-30017
                                  Conference Calendar                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LARRY COLEMAN,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 3:07-CR-247-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Larry Coleman has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Coleman has not filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of any potential claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel identified by counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be
resolved on direct appeal when [it] has not been raised before the district court
since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 09-30017

allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)
(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the
record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

                                      2