Court Opinion

ID: 3089924
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:51:56.316608+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:07.296202
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00019-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

LAWRENCE BENNY BROWN JR.,                                                    Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 24th District Court
                   of Victoria County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Lawrence Benny Brown Jr., attempts to appeal the trial court=s order of

October 2, 2012 correcting the court reporter’s record. On January 11, 2013, the Clerk

of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was
taken was not an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect within ten

days or the appeal would be dismissed.

      Appellant’s counsel responded, outlining the procedural history in which the Court

affirmed a judgment in another appeal Lawrence Benny Brown Jr. v. The State of Texas,

Cause No. 13-11-00595-CR, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 7007, *1-*2 (Tex. App.BCorpus

Christi Aug. 21, 2012, pet. filed). The Order to Correct Reporter’s Record signed on

October 2, 2012 appears to be related to Cause No. 13-11-00595-CR which was affirmed

without the corrected reporter’s record. Counsel’s response confirms that there is not an

appealable judgment.

      The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the

opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the

appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a).

                                                             PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
7th day of February, 2013.

                                           2