Court Opinion

ID: 988793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:57:59.031533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.629873
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7856

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WENDELL LEWIS EASLEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-63, CA-95-257-R)

Submitted:   February 27, 1996            Decided:   March 29, 1996

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell Lewis Easley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Urban Baer, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and denying his motion for recon-

sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Easley, Nos. CR-
93-63; CA-95-257-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 11 & 30, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2