Court Opinion

ID: 2527034
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:11:45.54443+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:12.087582
License: Public Domain

STATE OF HAWAII, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
COLSON LINDBERG PALANI CHING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 29536.
Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.
December 23, 2009.
On the briefs:
James S. Tabe, Deputy Public Defender, for Defendant-Appellant.
Loren J. Thomas, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
NAKAMURA, C.J., WATANABE and FUJISE, JJ.
Defendant-Appellant Colson Lindberg Palani Ching (Ching) appeals the Judgment, entered on November 28, 2008, in the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division (district court).[1]
Ching was convicted of Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OUVII), in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes § 291E-61(a) (Supp. 2008).
On appeal, Ching contends the written complaint and oral charge were insufficient because they failed to state an essential element of the charge, i.e., that Ching operated or assumed actual physical control of a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve Ching's point of error as follows:
Prior to trial, Ching moved to dismiss the charge because it failed to allege all the essential elements of the OVUII offense. The district court denied Ching's motion. "[T]he operation of a vehicle on a public way, street, road, or highway is an attendant circumstance of the offense of OUVII, and is therefore an element of the offense." State v. Wheeler, No. 29149, 2009 WL 3837633, at *8 (Haw. November 17, 2009). The failure to allege that Ching was driving a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway at the time of the offense rendered the charge deficient. Id.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the November 28, 2008 Judgment of the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division is vacated and the matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss without prejudice.
NOTES
[1]  The Honorable William A. Cardwell presided.