Court Opinion

ID: 4416670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-15 14:03:29.05392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:00.293515
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                         No. 1D18-0866
                 _____________________________

KATHERINE HIETT VIKER,

    Appellant,

    v.

ARTHUR COLLIN CHERRY,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Stewart E. Parsons, Senior Judge.

                          July 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

     Appellant challenges the trial court’s orders pertaining to a
modification of the parties’ parenting plan, modification of the
parties’ child support arrangement, and appellant’s motion for
attorney’s fees.

    We dismiss as to the issues pertaining to the parenting plan
and the child support arrangement for lack of jurisdiction because
appellant failed to timely appeal those orders. Shaffer v. Shaffer,
84 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So.
2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

     The sole remaining issue appellant raises is the trial court’s
denial of her motion for attorney’s fees. We find no error with the
trial court’s order denying her motion and affirm accordingly.
    AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Emilian "Ian" Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

A. Collin Cherry of Law Office of Collin Cherry, P.L., Tallahassee,
for Appellee.

                                2