Court Opinion

ID: 5500192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 02:58:18.65082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:54.680361
License: Public Domain

Barnard, P. J.
A coroner’s jury found one James McGloin guilty of manslaughter, and he was arrested by a warrant from the coroner, and on the 7th of February, 1890, while in custody under the coroner’s warrant in the county jail, gave a recognizance before the county judge pf Richmond county to appear at the next court of sessions for that county, that being the next court at which a grand jury would attend. This court was held on the 24th of February, 1890, and the grand jury found a bill of indictment against Mc-Gloin for manslaughter in the second degree. The indictment was found on 27th of February, and on the 1st of March, 1890, McGloin was called, and did not appear, and the sureties were called to produce McGloin, and they failed to do so. The undertaking upon the part of the prisoner and his sureties was sufficient in form. It recited the arrest of McGloin and his imprisonment for manslaughter in the second degree. The condition was that McGloin would appear at the court of sessions, and answer said charge, and that was the charge in the indictment, not in words, but by description of the offense. The legality of the proceedings preliminary to the arrest was not revelant or material. The arrest was made under color of process, and the defendant ac*321cepted the fact, and gave bail to answer before the grand jury. The offer to prove that the district attorney told the counsel for McGloin that he could go away, and that when he wanted him he would send for him, was no defense. Champlain v. People, 2 N. Y. 82; People v. Stager, 10 Wend. 431. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.