Court Opinion

ID: 9959842
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-12 19:07:53.959728+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:57.543178
License: Public Domain

People v Lugo (2024 NY Slip Op 50410(U))

[*1]

People v Lugo (Kenneth)

2024 NY Slip Op 50410(U)

Decided on March 29, 2024

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 29, 2024
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : WAVNY TOUSSAINT, P.J., MARINA CORA MUNDY, LISA S. OTTLEY, JJ

2022-667 Q CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
againstKenneth Lugo, Appellant. 

Appellate Advocates (Yaniv Kot of counsel), for appellant.
Queens County District Attorney (Johnnette Traill and Charles T. Pollak of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jerry Iannece, J.), rendered June 30, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
TOUSSAINT, P.J., MUNDY and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 29, 2024