Court Opinion

ID: 9388590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-21 00:00:31.372561+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:21.208825
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10462         Document: 00516719956             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/20/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10462
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                                 April 20, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Carlos Espinoza-Juarez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:19-CR-438-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Espinoza-Jaurez has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Jaurez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10462    Document: 00516719956         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/20/2023

                                 No. 22-10462

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2