Court Opinion

ID: 1006841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:17:04.289318+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:44.732874
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-8025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DEMARIO ANTWAIN HOPKINS, a/k/a Mario,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CR-98-37-5-6-FO, CA-01-194-5-F)

Submitted:   February 21, 2002             Decided:   March 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demario Antwain Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. John H. Bennett, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Demario Antwain Hopkins seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Hopkins, Nos. CR-98-37-5-6-

FO; CA-01-194-5-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2001).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2