Court Opinion

ID: 8452236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:57:22.646871+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.701819
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Simpson, No. 1:95-cr-00005-IMK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.