Court Opinion

ID: 1009626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:59:05.858873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:33:38.567902
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Herman Lee Tate appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Tate,
  
  No. CR-98-125-9-V (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 25, 2002; entered Oct. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
   
   *169
   
  facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.