Court Opinion

ID: 9830290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:04:10.940014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:17.921282
License: Public Domain

On Motions for Rehearing.
All parties have filed motions for rehearing, and all parties request us, not to reverse the entire judgment, but, in the event any part thereof must be reversed, that we reverse only that part which affects Survey 553. We have concluded that this request should be granted, apd our former judgment reversing the entire judgment' below will be set aside, and the judgment of the lower court will be in all things affirmed as to all appellees, except Geo. B. Parr, Thelma D. Parr, and Humble Oil & Refining Company, and as to said excepted appellees the judgment will be reversed and remanded, for the purpose of having the trial court determine whether or not the sale of Clarkson’s interest in Survey 553, by virtue of the power of sale in the deed of trust, was a valid sale, and for the further purpose of partitioning, if proper, Survey 553 between the joint owners thereof; it having been decided that the minor, Eliza Robles, is the owner of a two-twelfths undivided interest in said Survey 553, and whether or not Mrs. Clarkson is the owner of a five-twelfths undivided interest in this survey, being dependent upon whether or not the trustee’s sale is found to be valid or invalid. The trial court should also determine what sums of money, if _any, are due by Humble Oil & Refining tcfEliza Robles and to Mrs. Clarkson, if she be found to own an undivided interest in Survey 553. The costs of this appeal shall be taxed against Geo. B. Parr and Thelma D. Parr.
We wish to correct our statement in our original opinion to the effect that: “None of the instruments involved in this alleged foreclosure proceeding were ever placed of record, but were produced for the first time in 1935, some seven years after the alleged sale.”
The record discloses that the deed of trust was dated February 4, 1928, and recorded on the 3d day of May, 1928. However, this correction in no way affects the decision.
The judgment, as above indicated, will be affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part. In like manner all motions will be granted in part and overruled in part