Court Opinion

ID: 7734290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:50:17.278525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:48.219337
License: Public Domain

Prior report Ala.Crim.App. 727 So.2d 186.
The legal issue presented in this case is the same as that presented in Ex parte Parker, 740 So.2d 432 (Ala. 1999). In Parker, we addressed the issue whether § 32-5A-191(h), Ala. Code 1975, states a substantive offense, of which the three prior convictions referred to in that subsection are elements, or whether the prior offenses referred to in that subsection are properly to be considered only for the purposes of determining whether upon conviction a defendant shall receive an enhanced sentence. This Court held that § 32-5A-191(h) is a sentence-enhancing provision and does not create a separate substantive offense.
The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded, based on our holding in Parker.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HOOPER, C. J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, SEE, LYONS, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.
 On Application For Rehearing