Court Opinion

ID: 8083846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:03:51.525609+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:25.921636
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in ques*295tion dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”