Court Opinion

ID: 52778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:19:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:05.447483
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                    FILED
                        ________________________         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                May 10, 2007
                               No. 06-10501                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 05-00064-CR-T-26-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

THOMAS WILLIAM SCHWARTZ,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                                (May 10, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     J. Stanford Lifsey, counsel for Thomas William Schwartz, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Schwartz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                          2