Court Opinion

ID: 4241990
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-02 20:24:05.751148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:43.250021
License: Public Domain

People v Sheradin (2018 NY Slip Op 00667)

People v Sheradin

2018 NY Slip Op 00667

Decided on February 2, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 2, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

69 KA 16-00164

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vANDREW SHERADIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), dated December 8, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant's contention that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant established that his response to treatment was exceptional so as to warrant a downward departure, we conclude upon examining all of the relevant circumstances that the court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request (see People v Smith, 122 AD3d 1325, 1326 [4th Dept 2014]).
Entered: February 2, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court