Court Opinion

ID: 154624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 04:01:37+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:24.545576
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Tenth Circuit
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                             MAR 17 1997
                                   TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         PATRICK FISHER
                                                                                  Clerk

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

          Plaintiff - Appellee,
                                                          No. 96-3168
 v.
                                                   (D.C. No. 94-CR-10117-02)
                                                       (District of Kansas)
 DANNA J. HELMS,

          Defendant - Appellant.

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA, BALDOCK and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

      Defendant Danna Helms pleaded guilty to interstate transportation in aid of

a racketeering enterprise. The sentencing guidelines yielded a range of

imprisonment of 87 to 108 months. See II R., doc. 148 at 2-3. The maximum

penalty established by statute, however, was 60 months. See 18 U.S.C. §

1952(a)(3)(A) The district court sentenced defendant below the statutory

      *
        The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to
Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding
precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral
estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;
nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th
Cir. R. 36.3.
maximum, to 54 months, because she was a minor participant in the offense, the

offense was aberrant behavior for her and was caused by her desire to feed her

drug addiction.

      On appeal, defendant challenges the degree of the district court's downward

departure from the sentencing guidelines. She argues that the district court

should have relied on a combination of factors, including her low degree of

culpability, her difficult childhood and psychological problems, to depart even

further. It is well settled that, absent incorrect application of the guidelines, we

lack jurisdiction to review defendant's challenge to the degree of downward

departure from the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Bromberg, 933 F.2d

895, 896-97 (10th Cir. 1991); 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).

      Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                                        ENTERED FOR THE COURT

                                        Carlos F. Lucero
                                        Circuit Judge

                                          -2-