Court Opinion

ID: 51506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:06:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:28.352415
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                     FILED
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                               FEB 14, 2007
                               No. 06-13639                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                         ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 99-00038-CR-1-SPM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

WILLIE JONES,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Florida
                        _________________________

                             (February 14, 2007)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Stephen N. Bernstein, appointed counsel for Willie Jones, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Jones’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2