Court Opinion

ID: 8310311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 13:47:30.087439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:42.063227
License: Public Domain

Treat, J.
Reissued patent 6,080 of 1874, second claim of which is under consideration, has, as to that claim, expanded the original beyond legal limits. Therefore said reissued patent is void to the extent claimed, wherein the defendant is alleged to have infringed.
2. As to Kendall patent No. 174,684 there is no infringement.
3. As to Pattee patent of 1877, No. 187,899, said patent is void, there being no novelty of invention therein that is patentable.
Bill dismissed, with costs.