Court Opinion

ID: 8476044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:49:43.981392+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:25.715926
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION
PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The Department of Agriculture moves to dismiss Raymond L. Goodwin’s petition for review as untimely. Goodwin opposes. The United States replies.
The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a final decision on August 21, 2009, 112 M.S.P.R. 301, and served Goodwin via electronic mail on the same day. The Board informed Goodwin that its decision was final and that any petition for review must be received by this court within 60 calendar days of receipt of the Board’s decision. Pursuant to the Board’s regulations, “Board documents served electronically on registered e-filers are deemed received on the date of electronic submission,” i.e., August 21, 2009, in this case. The court received Goodwin’s petition for review on November 4, 2009, 75 days after Goodwin received the Board’s decision.
A petition for review must be received by the court within 60 days of receipt of the Board’s final order. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1). To be timely filed, the petition must be received by this court within 60 days of the date of receipt of the Board’s final order by Goodwin. Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp., Fed. Aviation Admin., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984). Because Goodwin’s petition was not timely received by this court, it must be dismissed.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.