Court Opinion

ID: 68037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:28:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:22.870416
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             July 24, 2009
                              No. 09-11077                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                        ________________________

                D. C. Docket No. 05-00071-CR-FTM-33-DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

CLAYTON K. UPSHAW,
a.k.a. Polk,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                               (July 24, 2009)

Before CARNES, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Darlene M. Geiger, appointed counsel for Clayton K. Upshaw, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Upshaw’s motion to reduce his

sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), is AFFIRMED.

                                          2