Court Opinion

ID: 9423868
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:09:24.037322+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:43.973616
License: Public Domain

Me. Justice Black,
concurring.
The Court here uses a cannon to dispose of a case that calls for no more than a popgun. The Durham Housing *285Authority has clearly stated, both in its brief and at oral argument, that it is fully complying with the directive of the Department of Housing and Urban Development concerning notice to tenants of reasons for their eviction. The only possible issue therefore is whether the directive should apply to Mrs. Thorpe, against whom eviction proceedings were started prior to the effective date of the HUD memorandum but who is still residing in public housing, as a result of judicial stays. I agree, of course, that the directive should apply to her eviction. Nothing else need be decided.