Court Opinion

ID: 9423908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:09:31.871487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:44.982114
License: Public Domain

Me. Justice Stewart,
concurring.
Although I agree with much of what is said in the Court’s opinion, and with its judgment in this case, I *515cannot share the Court’s uncritical assumption that, school discipline aside, the First Amendment rights of children are co-extensive with those of adults. Indeed, I had thought the Court decided otherwise just last Term in Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629. I continue to hold the view I expressed in that case: “[A] State may permissibly determine that, at least in some precisely delineated areas, a child — like someone in a captive audience — is not possessed of that full capacity for individual choice which is the presupposition of First Amendment guarantees.” Id., at 649-650 (concurring in result). Cf. Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U. S. 158.