Court Opinion

ID: 8080229
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 13:56:32.252736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:23.132651
License: Public Domain

By the Court :
Upon a writ of error, to a decree in chancery, nothing is examinable, but the bill, answer, and exhibits made part of them, the decree itself, and such matter as may be made part of the case, by a bill of exceptions. The court do not rehear the cause upon its merits. This case must, therefore, be decided upon the allegations of the parties, and upon the decree. From these it appears that Lemmon, the complainant below, purchased from the Waterses sixty acres of land, with some personal property, and was put in possession of the whole. These purchases were made at different times. The first for twenty acres, the latter for forty acres of land, the two tracts lying contiguous and adjoining. Lemmon remained in undisturbed possession of the whole of both tracts, and of the improvements made upon them. His bill contains no offer to surrender all, or any part to the Waterses, from whom he received 'it; but prays that the contract may be rescinded, and the purchase money paid by him refunded. The decree conforms to this prayer. It directs the contract, so far as it relates to the twenty acres, to be rescinded ; and it restores to Lemmon the purchase money, leaving him also the possession of the land. This we deem inequitable, and therefore erroneous. For this cause, the decree must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. As the cause may possibly come before us again, upon its whole merits, as presented by the proofs, it has not been considered necessary to-make up, or express an opinion, except upon this single point.
Decree reversed.