Court Opinion

ID: 9375110
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-24 21:01:17.147914+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:56.158093
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2245      Doc: 30          Filed: 02/23/2023   Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-2245

        DORA L. ADKINS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00749-PTG-WEF)

        Submitted: February 21, 2023                                 Decided: February 23, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2245      Doc: 30         Filed: 02/23/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of

        the magistrate judge, denying her requests for leave to file an emergency complaint and for

        leave to proceed on that complaint in forma pauperis, and dismissing her case. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Adkins’ motions

        for leave to amend her informal opening brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the

        district court. Adkins v. Fitness Int’l, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-00749-PTG-WEF (E.D. Va. Nov.

        22, 2022). We deny Adkins’ motions to vacate and remand, to withdraw, to reverse and

        remand, for leave to reverse and remand, for leave to vacate and remand, to replace, for

        leave to replace, and for leave to amend her motions to vacate and remand. We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2