Court Opinion

ID: 8455095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:22:34.424403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.164568
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tessa Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging a violation of the federal Wiretap Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Childress’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chil-dress has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.