Court Opinion

ID: 3206740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-25 16:15:20.072325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:57.687393
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               May 25, 2016
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
LARRY F. HUFFMAN,                                                             OF WEST VIRGINIA

Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 15-0720 (BOR Appeal No. 2050153)
                   (Claim No. 2014004162)

WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
      Petitioner Larry F. Huffman, pro se, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’
Compensation Board of Review. West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection, by H.
Toney Stroud, its attorney, filed a timely response.

        This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated July 1, 2015, in which
the Board affirmed a November 7, 2014, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges.
In its Order, the Office of Judges modified the claims administrator’s June 24, 2013, decision
which rejected the claim for failure to meet the exposure requirements set forth under West
Virginia Code § 23-4-1 (2008). The Office of Judges also rejected the claim because it was
untimely filed under West Virginia Code § 23-4-15(b) (2010). The Court has carefully reviewed
the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

         Mr. Huffman, an environmental technician and equipment operator, alleges that he
developed occupational pneumoconiosis in the course of his employment from May 1, 1995,
through November 30, 2007. Mr. Huffman previously filed a claim for occupational
pneumoconiosis while working for a different employer and was awarded a 10% permanent
partial disability award on December 11, 1992. Mr. Huffman also previously filed a claim for
                                                1
occupational pneumoconiosis while working for the West Virginia Division of Environmental
Protection in 2005. The application was rejected on July 26, 2005, due to a lack of exposure to
abnormal quantities of dust.

       An employment history indicates that Mr. Huffman treated and tested water, built ponds,
pumped sludge, operated a weed eater, and built roads in the course of his employment for the
West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection. Mr. Huffman testified in a hearing before
the Office of Judges on June 9, 2014, that he also sometimes ran equipment including a dozer,
backhoe, and truck. He further asserted that he worked with dehydrated lime and that the bags
sometimes burst open. He admitted that he had experienced breathing problems since 1987.

        The claims administrator rejected the claim for occupational pneumoconiosis on June 24,
2013, for failure to meet the exposure requirements set forth in West Virginia Code § 23-4-15(b).
The Office of Judges modified the decision in its November 7, 2014, Order and also rejected the
claim because it was untimely filed. The Office of Judges determined that Mr. Huffman’s
exposure to the hazards of occupational pneumoconiosis dust is highly questionable. It noted that
he tested water samples, built ponds, and hauled sludge in the course of his employment, none of
which is dusty work. It concluded that he failed to meet his burden of proof under West Virginia
Code § 23-4-1 to show that he was continuously exposed to abnormal quantities of dust for two
years. The Office of Judges also found that the claim should be rejected because it was not
timely filed. West Virginia Code § 23-4-15(b) provides that an application for occupational
pneumoconiosis must be filed within three years after the later of the following events: the day of
the last continuous period of sixty days that the claimant was exposed to occupational
pneumoconiosis or the date a diagnosed impairment was made known to the employee. Mr.
Huffman was diagnosed with occupational pneumoconiosis on November 17, 1988. He was then
granted a 10% permanent partial disability award on December 14, 1988. The Office of Judges
concluded that Mr. Huffman cannot possibly say he did not know or was not diagnosed with
occupational pneumoconiosis by a doctor at that time because he received a permanent partial
disability award for it. The Board of Review adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order on July 1, 2015.

        After review, we agree with the reasoning of the Office of Judges and conclusions of the
Board of Review. Mr. Huffman failed to meet his burden of proof under both West Virginia
Code §§ 23-4-1 and 23-4-15(b). He did not submit sufficient evidence to show that he was
exposed to the hazards of occupational pneumoconiosis for two consecutive years. He also failed
to timely file his claim.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                        Affirmed.

       ISSUED: May 25, 2016
                                                2
CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

                                 3