Court Opinion

ID: 9955655
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-28 21:02:44.153882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:11.594173
License: Public Domain

Filed 3/28/24 In re N.L. CA2/8
   NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                      DIVISION EIGHT

In re N.L., a Person Coming Under                                 B329975
the Juvenile Court Law.
                                                                  Los Angeles County
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN                                            Super. Ct. No. 17CCJP00940B
AND FAMILY SERVICES,

        Plaintiff and Appellant,

         v.

R.L. et al.,

        Defendants and Respondents;

N.L., a Minor, etc.,

        Appellant.
      APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Los
Angeles County. Mary E. Kelly, Judge. Appeals dismissed.
      Dawyn R. Harrison, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy,
Assistant County Counsel, and David Michael Miller, Deputy
County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
       Amy Z. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
for Appellant N.L.
       Megan Turkat Schirn, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent R.L.
       Christine E. Johnson, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent K.F.
                      _______________________
       The Los Angeles County Department of Children and
Family Services and the child N.L., who is the subject of this
dependency case, appealed the juvenile court’s May 18, 2023
order finding that father R.L. had established the parental bond
exception to termination of parental rights.
       This court took judicial notice on its own motion that on
March 5, 2024, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights
of both parents and ordered adoption as the permanent plan for
the child.
       On March 14, 2024, we sent a Government Code letter
advising the parties we intended to dismiss the appeal as moot
unless they establish dismissal is not proper. The deadline for
responses has passed. None of the parties has responded to our
letter.
       Accordingly, we conclude the appeals are moot.
                          DISPOSITION
       The appeals are dismissed.

                             GRIMES, Acting P. J.
     WE CONCUR:

                       WILEY, J.         VIRAMONTES, J.

                                2