Court Opinion

ID: 2965514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:41:22.595015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:04.783614
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No. 98-1093

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                        DANIEL D. TAVARES,

                      Defendant, Appellant.

           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

           [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]

                              Before

                      Selya, Circuit Judge,
                Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                

     Daniel D. Tavares on brief pro se.
     Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J.
Pelgro, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition.

SEPTEMBER 28, 1998

                                
                                
                                
                                        
                                                                           Per Curiam.  After careful review of the record, we
    agree that the district court properly dismissed appellant's
    Rule 35 motion as "utterly frivolous."  Accordingly, the
    district court's order is affirmed.  Appellant's motion to
    dismiss this appeal and motion to withdraw his motion to
    dismiss are moot.