Court Opinion

ID: 3193315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-12 20:05:27.835671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:48.335924
License: Public Domain

Matter of Wells v Konviser (2016 NY Slip Op 02751)

Matter of Wells v Konviser

2016 NY Slip Op 02751

Decided on April 12, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 12, 2016

Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter, Kahn, JJ.

800 6548/06 -685] 41/07

[*1]In re Carl D. Wells, Petitioner,
vHon. Jill Konviser, etc., et al., Respondents.

Carl D. Wells, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Jill Konviser, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for District Attorney, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 12, 2016
CLERK