Court Opinion

ID: 7137108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:25:09.296924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:39.724282
License: Public Domain

Opinion of the Court by Judge Hobson
Reversing.
After the decision of this court in Board of Councilmen v. Commonwealth, 94 S. W. 648, 29 Ky. Law Rep. 699, the city attorney of Louisville advised the Louisville Water Company that it was not liable- to state taxation. The sheriff of Jefferson county under the tax warrants in Ms hand's levied upon the *314property of the water company for the state taxes of 1906 on its tangible property. The water company thereupon filed an action in the 'Jefferson circuit court enjoining the sheriff from collecting' the taxes. A temporary injunction was granted by the chancellor, which on June 27, 1907, was made perpetual by a final judgment in the action. An appeal was taken from that judgment, and in this^ court it was held that the water company was subject to taxation. See Bell, Sheriff, v. City of Louisville, 106 S. W. 862, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 699. The petition for rehearing was filed, which was subsequently overruled, and thereupon the water company paid its taxes with the penalties. On March 7, 1908, Arthur E: Hopkins filed this suit as auditor’s agent in the name of the Commonwealth against the Louisville Water Company in the Franklin circuit court, in which he set up the fact that the company had been delinquent in the payment of its franchise tax for 1906 for 581 days, and sought to' recover a'judgment against it for a fine of $50 for each day the tax remained unpaid and 20 per cent, thereon. The company filed an answer to which the circuit court sustained a demurrer, and, it failing to plead further, entered a judgment against it as prayed in the petition. From this judgment, the water company appeals.
The proceeding is based on Section 4091, Ky. St., which, so far as material, is gs follows: “All state taxes assessed against any corporation, company or association under this article, shall be due and payable thirty days after notice of the same has been given said corporation, company or association by the auditor; and all county, municipal, school and other taxes shall be due and payable thirty days after, notice of the amount of said tax is given by the officer whose *315duty it is to collect the same; and every such corporation, company or association failing to pay its taxes, after receiving thirty days ’ notice, shall be deemed delinquent, and a penalty of ten per cent, on the amount of the tax shall attach, and thereafter such tax shall bear interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. Any such corporation, company or association failing to pay its taxes, penalty and interest, after becoming delinquent, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be fined fifty dollars for each day the same remains unpaid, to be recovered by indictment or civil action, of which the Franklin circuit court shall have jurisdiction.” It will be observed that any corporation failing to pay its,taxes, penalty, and interest after becoming delinquent shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction Shall he fined $50 for each day the tax remains unpaid. The statute adds a certain penalty to the tax: if it is not paid, and provides that the taxes shall then bear interest at 10 per cent., and it further provides that the nonpayment of the taxes, penalty, and interest shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of $50 a day. The question which lies at the threshold of this case is: Has the auditor’s agent authority to* institute a proceeding for the punishment of a misdemeanor created by statute? The only authority relied on is. section 4263, Ky. St.: “It shall be the* duty of the revenue agent, and he shall have authority when directed by the auditor, to institute suits,, motions, or proceedings in the name of the Commonwealth against any delinquent officer, or other person, to recover any money which may be due the Commonwealth; and, in all such suits, motions or proceedings in which a judgment is recovered, the party in default shall, in addition to the amount for *316which he is liable to- the state, be adjudged to pay a penalty of twenty per cent, of the amount due; and the revenue agent who prosecutes such action and recovers, the amount due the Commonwealth, shall be entitled to receive said penalty for his services. The penalties- herein provided for shall not be in addition to the penalties in actions in the name of the Commonwealth prosecuted by the county attorney or other attorneys for the Commonwealth. The money so1 adjudged due the Commonwealth, and penalties and costs, shall be paid to the State Treasurer, and he shall, within thirty days, pay tbe twenty per cent, penalty and costs to tbe officers entitled thereto. ’ ’ By this section the auditor’s agent, is authorized when directed by tbe auditor to institute suits to recover any money which may be due the Commonwealth; hut, when a person is alleged to have committed a misdemeanor, he cannot be said to be owing to- tbe Commonwealth any money until his. guilt has been established by conviction. When he has been convicted of the offense, the amount of the judgment is due by him to. the Commonwealth; but it was- not contemplated by this statute that the auditor's agent should1 be- authorized to- prosecute persons supposed to be guilty of a misdemeanor, and thus- collect from them not only the fine imposed by the statute, but also a 20 per cent, penalty thereon. The- 20 per cent, penalty is allowed by the statute as a penalty against the person who has failed' to- pay the Commonwealth money which he owed it. But, when a, person is simply charged with having committed a public offense, he cannot be proceeded against under this section. If the prosecution was instituted by the Commonwealth attorney, simply a fine would be imposed; but, if it may be maintained under this section, a *317penalty of 20 per cent, in addition to the fine may be required to be paid. The Legislature contemplated no such, result. It had not in mind in enacting section 4263 an additional procedure for the prosecution of offenses against the penal laws.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to' the circuit court to dismiss the proceedings.