Court Opinion

ID: 9874804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 22:16:23.242528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:52.852462
License: Public Domain

DANIEL KELLY, J.
¶ 54. (concurring). I concur in the mandate because there were two accidents, one following immediately after the other. I do not join the court's opinion, however, because its reasoning could be understood to allow, in a single accident with a single victim, a separate charge for each paragraph of Wis. Stat. § 346.67(1)—a result that I think would be improper.
f 55. For the foregoing reasons, I concur.
1 56. I am authorized to state that Justices SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON and ANN WALSH BRADLEY join this concurrence.