Court Opinion

ID: 1021123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:01:42.205581+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:07:19.185956
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Martin,
  
  No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D.Va. May 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.