Court Opinion

ID: 989452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:20.111377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:40.827808
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6408

PAMELA JEAN WATSON,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CITY OF RALEIGH, Raleigh Police Department,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-96-65-5-BO)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                   Decided:   June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela Jean Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Watson v. City of Raleigh, No. CA-96-65-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb.
22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2