Court Opinion

ID: 9499286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 17:43:06.336643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:59:23.308094
License: Public Domain

RYAN, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I concur in my brother’s opinion, except with respect to part II.C. The government concedes that, even under plain error review, this case should be remanded for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and we agree. Therefore, I do not think it is necessary to address whether Triana’s objections at sentencing preserved his claim that the district court’s fact finding, which resulted in an enhanced sentence under the mandatory guidelines, violated Triana’s constitutional rights under the Sixth Amendment.