Court Opinion

ID: 8102593
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:27:52.598118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:39.670093
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Wilson, J.
It was stipulated that the items marked “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D” are neither appropriate nor suitable for the purpose of ornamentation to which artificial flowers may be temporarily devoted and that the merchandise consists of articles the same in all material respects, except for the component material of chief value, as those the subject of Abstract 57673. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 1023, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of vegetable fiber, other than cotton; (2) the items marked “B” at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of yarns, threads, or filaments; (3) the items marked “C” at 12]4 percent under the provision in paragraph 1537 (a), as modified by T. D. 51802, for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of palm leaf, other than raffia; and (4) the items marked “D” at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (a) as articles, composed wholly or in chief value of straw.