Court Opinion

ID: 997920
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:03:48.842168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:02.945292
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7382

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DERRICK GRATE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-93-161-A)

Submitted:   February 11, 1999         Decided:     February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Grate, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Hugh White, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Derrick Grate seeks to appeal the district court’s order

declining to reconsider the order denying his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).      See Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Grate, No. CR-93-161-A

(E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1998).*   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
September 4, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on September 8, 1998.      Pursuant to
Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is
the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we
take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See
Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                 2