Court Opinion

ID: 2963651
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:13:30.48334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:39.548053
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          September 20, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                      

                                 ____________________

        No. 94-2206 

                                   KEITH A. WERNER,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                 GEORGE VOSE, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                    [Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Cyr, Boudin and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Keith A. Werner on brief pro se.
            _______________
            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department
            _________________
        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.   Plaintiff appeals  from a  district court
                 ___________

            decision  denying  his   motion  for  preliminary  injunctive

            relief.   Especially  in  light of  our  recent  decision  in

            Collazo-Leon v. United States Bureau of Prisons,  51 F.3d 315
            ____________    _______________________________

            (1st Cir. 1995),  we agree  with the district  court that  no

            likelihood of success on the merits has been established.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________