Court Opinion

ID: 8441739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:53:28.473029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.888608
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
T. Thorne-El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. Because Thorne-El may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismiss*579al order is interlocutory and not appeal-able. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.