Court Opinion

ID: 9864686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 14:58:26.46162+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:08.228474
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
In the petition for a hearing in this court, after decision by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, special complaint is made of that portion of the opinion which reads as follows:
“Irrigation is not of such state-wide necessity and importance as to make it probable that the legislature contemplated in its behalf so radical a change in the general policy of the law of eminent domain. There are large portions of ■the state along the coast where the humidity is so great as to make irrigation wholly unnecessary; there are other extensive portions of the state where excellent crops are produced by the natural rainfall, as is well known; still other regions are arid and irrigation is necessary to the production crops.”
This portion of the opinion is not in any way essential to the decision, and in denying the application for a hearing ■in this court we deem it proper to say that we express no opinion thereon.
The application for a hearing in this court is denied.