Court Opinion

ID: 1010603
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:14:17.323427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:27.210474
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  PER CURIAM.
 

  Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pigford v. United States,
  
  No. CA-01-200-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.