Court Opinion

ID: 4191813
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-08-02 15:06:46.818856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:25.905189
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                                State of Florida
                           Opinion filed August 2, 2017.
          Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
                                ________________

                                No. 3D17-1024
                          Lower Tribunal No. 16-10512
                              ________________

                                Jerry Ridgeway,
                                     Appellant,

                                         vs.

                             The State of Florida,
                                     Appellee.

      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the
Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. Johnson, Judge.

      Jerry Ridgeway, in proper person.

      Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

      SUAREZ, J.

      Jerry Jerome Ridgeway appeals from the summary denial of his motion to

correct credit for time served.1 We reverse.

1 A motion seeking additional credit for time served is normally brought pursuant
to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801.
       Ridgeway alleges he was not given proper credit for time served in Texas

and South Carolina while on hold for transfer to Dade County on a fugitive

warrant. There is no evidence in the record before us to show Ridgeway was not

entitled to the credit for time served prior to sentencing that he alleges. But see

Morales v. State, 970 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (granting a defendant credit

for time served outside of the state of Florida on unrelated charges, when a warrant

or detainer is issued by this state, is discretionary, not mandatory).

       On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-

conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D). Because the record now before us fails to

make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further

proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-

conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that

the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

       Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

                                               2