Court Opinion

ID: 9865461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 17:57:48.646056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:14.623708
License: Public Domain

*301On Petition fob. Rehearing.
Per Curiam.
A petition for rehearing and brief in support thereof having been filed in this cause by the appellant, Joseph S. Diver, and oral argument having been permitted thereon, all with special leave of this Court first had and obtained with respect thereto, arguments in support of the petition for rehearing were, on January 16, 1934, duly heard and considered by the Court. Upon full reconsideration of the entire controversy, after briefs and arguments of the parties, this Court has again reached the conclusion that, for the reasons stated in the opinion of this Court filed December 19, 1933, and with the specific qualifications in said opinion set forth, the decree of the Circuit Court appealed from, should stand affirmed as first adjudged, and in consequence thereof that the appellants’ petition for rehearing should be denied.
Rehearing denied.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown .and Buford, J. J., concur.