Court Opinion

ID: 9848054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:12:05.53466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:57.831712
License: Public Domain

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING
In her petition for rehearing, Appellant correctly states this court failed to specifically address whether a new trial should have been granted on the basis of newly discovered evidence.
We find the evidence presented in support of Appellant’s motion for new trial was cumulative and could have been discovered before trial by the exercise of due diligence and was in fact within the knowledge of Appellant at time of trial. It added nothing to the “totality of the evidence” such as to require the trial judge to change his original decision.
Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.
BACON, P. J., and BRIGHTMIRE, J., concur.