Court Opinion

ID: 6017033
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 11:25:22.594554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:35.628786
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York, dated December 20, 1995, which adopted the findings and recommendation of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of certain enumerated charges and terminated his employment as a school custodian.
Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that the penalty is annulled and is otherwise denied, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondent for the imposition of a penalty not to exceed suspension for a period of two years.
The determination of the Administrative Law Judge to sustain, in part, specification I and specification II against the petitioner was supported by substantial evidence (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). However, we find that under all the circumstances the penalty of dismissal was so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222), especially in light of the petitioner’s prior satisfactory ratings by his immediate supervisor. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York for the imposition of a penalty not to exceed the suspension of the petitioner from his position as a school custodian for a period of two years. Joy, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.