Court Opinion

ID: 6834322
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:01:14.427616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:04:39.285061
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
No claim is made in this case that the driver of the truck was prosecuú ed with effect, or at all, under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.) for the transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of law, and the automobile was therefore subject to forfeiture under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352). United States v. One Ford Coupé Automobile, 47 S. Ct. 154, 71 L. Ed. -; Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United States (decided by the Supreme Court November 23, 1926) 47 S. Ct. 165, 71 L. Ed.
Judgment affirmed.