Court Opinion

ID: 8680232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:41:56.087593+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.787152
License: Public Domain

*141Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Darniel Sweeting appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweeting v. Miller, No. 7:14-cv-00187-NKM-RSB, 2015 WL 4773276 (W.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2015). We deny Sweeting’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.