Court Opinion

ID: 8447353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:18:30.873062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.191808
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Don Eddlon Knox appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Knox, No. 3:97-cr-00262-RLW-l 1 (E.D.Va. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.