Court Opinion

ID: 8518418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 08:57:32.214135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:51:25.209509
License: Public Domain

President.
It is not necessary to consider all the errors assigned in this case, because we are satisfied that the judgment of the justices must be reversed, they having proceeded without a complaint in writing made to them by the plaintiff below.
The “ act against forcible entry and detainer,” provides, “that when complaint shall be made in writing, to any two justices of the peace, of any unlawful and forcible entry, &c. they shall make out their warrant,” &c. The complaint in writing, is to be the foundation of the whole proceedings; upon that alone, are the justices authorised to issue their warrant; it does not appear by the return to this Certiorari, that any such complaint was made: there is, therefore, on the return, an apparen t want of jurisdiction in the magistrates. — It is not only necessary that a complaint should be made in writing to the justices, but such complaint should be a part of the return to the writ of Oértiorari; for without having the complaint before us, we cannot judge of the correctness of the proceedings below; as in this case we cannot know, from the return of the justices, what property it was which the plaintiff sought to recover possession of, nor where situated; so that, if we were to affirm the judgment of the justices, it would be impossible to award a writ of restitution.
Judgment of the justices reversed.