Court Opinion

ID: 8680911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:05:40.319894+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.346453
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph F. Vaughan, II, and Katherine M. Vaughan seek to appeal the district court’s order granting Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. §A292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Vaughans seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack *187of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED