Court Opinion

ID: 5390375
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 09:46:34.832496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:17.659225
License: Public Domain

(Cf. Henning v. Henning, 272 App. Div. 676; De Robertis V. De Robertis, 254 App. Div. 811; Davis v. Davis, 195 App. Div. 430; Botway v. Botway, 273 App. Div. 948.) Although we do not regard such recitals as a determination of the issues involved, nor as binding in any respect on the court which will try the issues, they are redundant and unnecessary. (Cf. White v. White, 175 Misc. 66.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.