Court Opinion

ID: 8426844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 03:04:51.027378+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:31.952328
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Rudy Cruz-Santos, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an *682immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the denial of asylum, Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
Because Cruz-Santos did not meet his burden of persuasion that he was persecuted on account of an enumerated ground, he is ineligible for asylum. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).
It follows that Cruz-Santos did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000).
The panel need not consider separately whether the BIA erred by streamlining Cruz-Santos’s case because substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of his application for relief. See Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that the merits determination and decision to streamline ordinarily collapse into one another).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.