Court Opinion

ID: 995779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:42:09.296104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:00.790934
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6514

JOE DON WASHINGTON,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-97-778-4-23)

Submitted:   July 22, 1998                 Decided:   August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christian Hancock Hartley, NESS, MOTLEY, LOADHOLT, RICHARDSON &
POOLE, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant.     Donald John
Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Joe Don Washington seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Washington v. South Carolina, No. CA-97-778-4-

23 (D.S.C. Mar. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2