Court Opinion

ID: 9947015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-01 21:01:13.930763+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:45.459033
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6529      Doc: 11         Filed: 02/29/2024     Pg: 1 of 3

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6529

        KEITH W. JONES,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        CRYSTAL ATKINSON; CAPTAIN MCPHERSON; SGT HONEYCUTT; SGT
        HENDERSON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HALEY,

                             Defendants - Appellees,

               and

        SGT GRAHAM; SGT JOLLY; SGT FLOYD; JUSTIN W. BUTLER; BRAD
        PERRITT; JULIAN PRIEST; GEORGE BAYSDEN; UNIT MANAGER BROWN;
        UNIT MANAGER WEST; UNIT MANAGER LANEHART; UNIT MANAGER
        SPIVEY; DOCTOR SCOTT; TODD E. ISHEE; ERIK A. HOOKS,

                             Defendants.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03008-D)

        Submitted: February 27, 2024                                  Decided: February 29, 2024

        Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6529      Doc: 11          Filed: 02/29/2024   Pg: 2 of 3

        Keith W. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                     2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6529      Doc: 11         Filed: 02/29/2024      Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Keith W. Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

        favor of Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which Jones alleged that

        Defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the

        record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Jones

        v. Atkinson, No. 5:21-ct-03008-D (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2023). We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     3