Court Opinion

ID: 9349467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-21 22:09:16.472608+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:23.978476
License: Public Domain

12/21/2022
                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                             AT KNOXVILLE
                                      December 19, 2022

                   BENJAMIN MCCURRY v. AGNESS MCCURRY

                  Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County
                     No. 38147 Thomas J. Wright, Senior Judge
                        ___________________________________

                              No. E2022-01278-COA-R3-CV
                          ___________________________________

Because the order appealed from does not constitute a final appealable judgment, this Court
lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

                 Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

KRISTI M. DAVIS, J.; D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J.; AND JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J.

Agness McCurry, Johnson City, Tennessee, pro se appellant.

Sandy Phillips, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the appellee, Benjamin McCurry.

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION1

       The appellant, Agness McCurry (“Appellant”), filed a notice of appeal on
September 13, 2022, which states that appellant is appealing the September 8, 2022 order
of the Circuit Court for Washington County (“the Trial Court”). The appellee, Benjamin
McCurry (“Appellee”), filed a motion to dismiss alleging that there is no final judgment
from which an appeal as of right would lie. Appellant responded to the motion. By Order
entered September 19, 2022, this Court granted appellant up to and including October 19,

       1
           Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides:

       This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm,
       reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a
       formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by
       memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall
       not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated
       case.
2022 within which to obtain a final judgment. Our September 19, 2022 Order denied
Appellee’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to Appellee’s ability to re-file the motion
if Appellant failed to obtain a final judgment in compliance with our order. By Order
entered October 19, 2022, this Court granted Appellant a second extension of time up to
and including December 2, 2022 within which to obtain a final judgment.

      On November 30, 2022, Appellant filed a document, which asserted that the appeal
should not be dismissed as the original trial court judge, Judge Lauderback, had recused
himself, and Judge Thomas J. Wright had recently been assigned to hear the case.
Appellant asserted that she was in the process of scheduling a hearing before Judge Wright.

      On December 1, 2022, Appellee filed a second motion to dismiss for lack of a final
judgment and for fees and costs. Appellee provided this Court with an order signed by
Judge Wright granting a motion for a stay filed by the Appellant.

      Appellant failed to obtain a final judgment in compliance with our October 19, 2022
Order. Furthermore, the proceedings in the Trial Court have been stayed upon motion filed
by Appellant. As such, it is unlikely that a final judgment will be entered in the near future.

        “A final judgment is one that resolves all the issues in the case, ‘leaving nothing
else for the trial court to do.’” In re Estate of Henderson, 121 S.W.3d 643, 645 (Tenn.
2003) (quoting State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834, 840 (Tenn. Ct. App.
1997)). This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal as of
right if there is no final judgment. See Bayberry Assocs. v. Jones, 783 S.W.2d 553, 559
(Tenn. 1990) (“Unless an appeal from an interlocutory order is provided by the rules or by
statute, appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments only.”).

       “Except where otherwise provided, this Court only has subject matter jurisdiction
over final orders.” Foster-Henderson v. Memphis Health Center, Inc., 479 S.W.3d 214,
222 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). As the order appealed from does not constitute a final
appealable judgment, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. The appeal is
hereby dismissed. As this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, Appellee’s
motion for fees and costs is denied. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Agness
McCurry, for which execution may issue.

                                                          PER CURIAM

                                             -2-