Court Opinion

ID: 995661
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:40:25.58112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:00.474726
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7496

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HOMER RICHARDS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-62-A, CA-97-634-AM)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                  Decided:   July 20, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Homer Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Alan Scheele, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Richards, Nos. CR-93-62-A, CA-97-634-AM

(E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1997). We deny the request for stay and dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2