Court Opinion

ID: 4243074
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-07 20:23:21.288436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:10.066012
License: Public Domain

People v Diaz (2018 NY Slip Op 00842)

People v Diaz

2018 NY Slip Op 00842

Decided on February 7, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 7, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2014-02763
 (Ind. No. 8015/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJulio Diaz, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (William Kastin of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), rendered March 12, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly admitted evidence of a prior altercation between the defendant and the victim, where the defendant chased the victim and struck him in the head with a bat. This evidence was probative of the defendant's motive and intent, provided necessary background information on the nature of their relationship, and placed the charged conduct in context (see People v Dorm, 12 NY3d 16, 19; People v Williams, 27 AD3d 673; People v James, 19 AD3d 616). Moreover, the probative value of the uncharged crime evidence outweighed the prejudice to the defendant, particularly considering the trial court's limiting instruction (see People v Dorm, 12 NY3d at 19; People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 242; People v Rock, 65 AD3d 558, 559).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court