Court Opinion

ID: 9826505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 16:01:36.926979+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:33.669315
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Gary
concurs in the result, as the cases of Battle v. C. N. & L. R. R., 70 S. C., 329, 49 S. E., 849, and Dellency v. Granite Co., 72 S. C., 39, 51 S. E., 531, show that the corporate existence of the defendant was not put in issue, as there was not a demurrer or defense raising such question.
Mr. Justice Jones.
While I think there was technical error in excluding testimony as complained in the fifth exception, this ruling was rendered harmless by subsequently permitting full testimony of defendants 'as to the injury sustained by them by being restricted to a partial use of the building.
Mr. Justice Woods concurs in the result.