Court Opinion

ID: 4048910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 00:47:56.79257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:30:58.907527
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-15-00152-CR

                                   COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                          CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

LEANDRE VONZELL HILL,                                                                         Appellant,

                                                    v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                            Appellee.

                          On appeal from the 379th District Court
                                 of Bexar County, Texas

                                             ORDER
                   Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Longoria
                                  Order Per Curiam
        Appellant’s counsel, Richard B. Dulany, Jr., has filed a motion requesting to

withdraw as counsel.1         According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him

to withdraw because he is no longer employed by the Bexar County Public Defender’s

        1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio pursuant
to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.).
Office.

          Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd).      In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

          Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter

an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,

the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel

shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its

order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court

on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

          It is so ordered.

                                                         Per Curiam

Do Not Publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2.

Delivered and filed this
the 2nd day of October, 2015.

                                              2