Court Opinion

ID: 5550786
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 22:01:23.200183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:31.380329
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-11704      Date Filed: 01/10/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-11704
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVEN J. MCLENDON,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Northern District of Florida
            D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00048-TKW-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11704        Date Filed: 01/10/2022     Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                21-11704

Before WILSON, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
        Michelle Hendrix, appointed counsel for Steven McLendon
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and McLendon’s conviction and sen-
tence are AFFIRMED.