Court Opinion

ID: 4702245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-08 20:04:20.983852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:23.450537
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 21-909V
                                        UNPUBLISHED

    BRENDA WHITE,
                                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran
                        Petitioner,
    v.
                                                             Filed: June 9, 2021
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Motion for decision; Dismissal;
                                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
                        Respondent.                          Injury Related to Vaccine
                                                             Administration (SIRVA)

Leigh Finfer, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Heather L. Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                               DECISION1

       On February 10, 2021, Brenda White filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34,2
(the “Vaccine Act”). Ms. White alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) from an influenza vaccine she received on November
6, 2019. ECF no. 1.

       On May 24, 2021, Ms. White filed a motion for a decision dismissing her petition.
ECF no. 9. For the reasons set forth below, Ms. White’s motion is GRANTED, and this
case is DISMISSED.

       In her petition, Ms. White alleged that she received an influenza vaccination but
did not otherwise detail any of her symptoms or medical treatment. ECF no. 1. The
February 11, 2021 PAR Initial Order required Ms. White to file all the statutorily required
1Although I have not formally designated this Decision for publication, I am required to post it on the United
States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be
available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has
14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute
an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this
definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
documents, including medical records documenting the onset of the injury. ECF No. 5.
On May 20, 2021, Ms. White some medical records.

       On May 21, 2021, Ms. White filed a motion for a decision dismissing her petition
stating that she is “unable to show onset of SIRVA symptoms within forty-eight (48)
hours of vaccination.” ECF no. 9.

        To receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program, a petitioner must prove either 1) that the vaccinee suffered a “Table Injury” –
i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table – corresponding to one of the
vaccinations, or 2) that the vaccinee suffered an injury that was actually caused by a
vaccine. See §§ 300aa—13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1). Ms. White alleged that she sustained
a SIRVA Table Injury.

        Under the Vaccine Act, a petitioner may not receive compensation based solely
on the petitioner’s claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either
medical records or by the opinion of a competent physician. § 300aa—13(a)(1). For a
Table Injury, among other requirements, a petitioner must establish with supporting
documentation that she received a covered vaccine, that she sustained a covered
injury, and that she either suffered the effects of this injury for at least six months or the
injury resulted in inpatient hospitalization and surgical intervention. § 300aa—11(c)(1).
Ms. White admitted in her motion for a decision that she will not be able to establish the
onset of the injury within the Table’s timeframe and, therefore, is not able to prove her
entitlement to compensation. Moreover, the record does not support the alleged onset.

      Thus, Petitioner has failed to establish entitlement to compensation in the Vaccine
Program. This case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The clerk shall enter
judgment accordingly.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                   s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                   Brian H. Corcoran
                                                   Chief Special Master

3If Petitioner wishes to bring a civil action, she must file a notice of election rejecting the judgment
pursuant to § 21(a) “not later than 90 days after the date of the court’s final judgment.”

                                                       2