Court Opinion

ID: 9449288
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 15:01:33.773537+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:34:14.473875
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11976   Document: 8-1      Date Filed: 08/04/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-11976
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      GLENMORE POOLE,
                                                   Petitioner-Appellant,
      versus
      SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
      ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                                Respondents-Appellees.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cv-01983-KKM-AEP
USCA11 Case: 23-11976      Document: 8-1     Date Filed: 08/04/2023      Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-11976

                           ____________________

      Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Although Glenmore Poole’s motion for reconsideration was
      timely to toll the time to appeal from the district court’s March 31,
      2023 final judgment until its resolution, the district court denied
      the motion on May 9, 2023. Thus, the 30-day statutory time limit
      required Poole to file a notice of appeal on or before June 8, 2023.
      See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, he did
      not file a notice of appeal until June 9, 2023, which is the date he
      provided the notice to prison officials for mailing. See Jeffries v.
      United States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014). Further, there is
      no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate
      Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accordingly, the notice of appeal can-
      not invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood
      Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017); Green v. Drug Enf’t Ad-
      min., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.