Court Opinion

ID: 6008369
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 10:34:37.63253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:26.141976
License: Public Domain

—Determination of respondent Commissioner of Sanitation dated October 22, 1992, dismissing petitioner from employment, unanimously annulled without costs, the petition granted, the matter remanded to the agency for further proceedings, and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Elliott Wilk, J.], entered April 8, 1993) disposed of in accordance with the decision herein.
We find that, under the circumstances of this case, petitioner was deprived of a fair hearing when the Hearing Officer who heard the primary witness against petitioner was unable to complete the hearing, and a second Hearing Officer was assigned to complete the hearing and render a decision. In light of the discrepancies in the witness’s description of the sanitation worker who had allegedly committed the impropriety of accepting $20 for the removal of bulk waste, the inability of the Hearing Officer who rendered the decision to actually view the demeanor of the witness and evaluate his credibility significantly undermined the fairness of the hearing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.