Court Opinion

ID: 8207271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-19 18:00:16.019997+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:24.165957
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-11233      Document: 00516475726         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/19/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                      September 19, 2022
                                  No. 21-11233
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Nathaniel Collazo,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:21-CR-16-1

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nathaniel
   Collazo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Collazo has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-11233     Document: 00516475726          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/19/2022

                                   No. 21-11233

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2