Court Opinion

ID: 9722845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 09:52:25.891135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:40.517896
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing
RENTTO, Judge.
The judgment appealed from in this matter dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff and dissolved the interlocutory injunction which had been issued. Our opinion filed on July 19, 1968, affirmed the judgment in its entirety. The petition for rehearing suggests that our affirmance of the dismissal portion of the judgment must have been an inadvertence because our opinion is concerned only with the dissolution of the injunctive relief and does not mention the merits of petitioner's cause of action. This is a valid observation.
We did not intend to affirm the whole of the judgment appealed from. Accordingly, our opinion and judgment are amended to affirm only that part of the judgment appealed from which dissolved the interlocutory injunction and to reverse the portion thereof which dismissed the complaint on its merits. To this extent the relief asked in the petition is granted, but as to the remainder it is denied.
ROBERTS, BIEGELMEIER, and HOMEYER, JJ„ concur.
HANSON, P. J„ dissents.