Court Opinion

ID: 7692713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 18:40:34.999323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:44.732706
License: Public Domain

ERVIN, Judge.
We affirm appellant’s grand theft convictions and the sentences imposed therefor, but reverse and remand the restitution order. Appellant objected to the amount of restitution, and the trial court erroneously failed to allow appellant to be heard on the issue. See Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Goodson v. State, 400 So.2d 791, 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.
BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.