Court Opinion

ID: 8462721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:33:57.028774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.694054
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cabiness, No. 4:02-cr-70031-1, 2008 WL 2906942 (W.D.Va. July 28, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008). *227See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.