Court Opinion

ID: 999045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:19:51.327938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:49.364384
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-6185

JAMES C. BELLE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

H. R. POWELL, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-98-287-3)

Submitted:   June 17, 1999                 Decided:   June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. Belle, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James C. Belle seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 1999) denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Belle v. Powell, No. CA-98-

287-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 1998).       We deny Belle’s motion for ap-

pointment of counsel.   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2