Court Opinion

ID: 9714612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 05:41:27.006205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:18.957044
License: Public Domain

SHEPARD, Chief Justice,
concurring.
I fully join the Court's opinion, pausing only to observe explicitly what the opinion holds implicitly-that whether one of the five exceptions to the general rule of non-liability exists in a particular case can be a legal question resolved through summary judgment, depending on the facts before the trial court. I agree with Justice Dickson's conclusion that summary judgment should be sustained here because "(alt the time the contracts were made, the delegated work did not present the peculiar probability that an injury such as Bagley's would result unless precautionary measures were taken, and the employers could not have been expected to foresee the sort of injury which actually occurred."