Court Opinion

ID: 1003677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:30:14.356987+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:24.620835
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REGINALD R. WILLIAMS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-95-332-A, CA-98-1720-A)

Submitted:   February 20, 2001             Decided:   March 2, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald R. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Reginald R. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-95-332-A;

CA-98-1720-A (E.D. Va. filed July 17, 2000; entered July 20, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2