Court Opinion

ID: 98624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:44:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:41.204112
License: Public Domain

239 U.S. 635
36 S.Ct. 283
60 L.Ed. 479
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL, & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILROAD  COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,v.LOUISE ALEXANDER, Administratrix, etc.
No. 148.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916

Mr. William A. Hayes for plaintiff in error.
Mr. D. W. McNamara and Miss Anna B. Hull for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:

1
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 59 L. ed. 279, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Missouri P. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512, 29 L. ed. 463, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26, 32 L. ed. 585, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 207; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364, 37 L. ed. 769, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 870; (3) Waters-Pierce Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118, 53 L. ed. 431, 434, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U. S. 102, 57 L. ed. 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31, 59 L. ed. 112, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14.