Court Opinion

ID: 6030646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:48:37.573225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:14.812977
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered June 16, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that the People failed to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move in the trial court for dismissal of the indictment on that ground (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Ellis, 230 AD2d 751).
*388In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find, as we did on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Guerra, 236 AD2d 556), that it was legally sufficient to disprove the justification defense and to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Ellis, supra; People v Arlequin, 214 AD2d 747; People v Torres, 182 AD2d 788; People v Scalise, 55 AD2d 992). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]; see also, People v Walker, 214 AD2d 594).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and McGinity, JJ., concur.