Court Opinion

ID: 1000579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:42:43.312098+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:16.077502
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LESTER DEWAYNE LANGLEY,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CR-94-37, CA-99-100-T)

Submitted:   November 30, 1999            Decided:   January 4, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Dewayne Langley, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry W. Miller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lester Dewayne Langley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Langley, Nos. CR-94-37;

CA-99-100-T (W.D.N.C. June 23, 1999).        We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2