Court Opinion

ID: 3072074
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:43:03.277053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:19.475780
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-15-00009-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ALVIN DWAYNE STREET,                                                     Appellant,

                                         v.

VIRGINIA VANEGAS UNDERBRINK,                        Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 347th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Alvin Dwayne Street, appeals from a protective order entered in favor

of Virginia Vanegas Underbrink. On March 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified

appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on February 9,

2015, and that the deputy district clerk, Tiffany Garza, had notified this Court that

appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of
this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the

defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised

that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice,

the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       On March 9, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent

in remitting a $195.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices and has failed to pay the

filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                   PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
9th day of April, 2015.

                                               2