Court Opinion

ID: 6607271
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:14:50.486762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:58:13.842040
License: Public Domain

By the Court.
— The objection is fatal. The commissioners do not derive their authority from the parties, but from the court ;(b) and as it is a special authority, it must be strictly pursued. The power given to four, cannot be well executed by three commissioners. (c)
The evidence overruled.

&) Those who execute a commission, are appointed by the court, and although they may be nominated by the parties, they are not their agents. Gilpin v. Consequa, Peters C. C. 88.

 If a commission, directed to five commissioners, of whom three are named by the plaintiff’ and two by the defendant, is executed by three only, or by any number less *354than the whole, a deposition taken under it cannot be read, although the two commissioners named by the defendant, by whom the objection is made, were present. The authority of the commissioners is special, and must be executed according to the tenor of it. Armstrong v. Brown, 1 W. C. C. 34. See also Hoofnagle v. Dering, 1 Yeates 302. A joint commission cannot be executed by some of the commissioners, although the others refused to act. Munns v. Dupont, 3 W. C. C. 41. A deposition taken by a commissioner, in conjunction with a person not named in the commission, is not admissible in evidence. Willing v. Consequa, Peters C. C. 309.