Court Opinion

ID: 9397047
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-24 15:04:04.167213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:21.029016
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                          Opinion filed May 24, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                             No. 3D23-649
                      Lower Tribunal No. F13-27250

                          Orlier Suarez Albo,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                          The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

     Orlier Suarez Albo, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Persaud v. State, 838 So. 2d 529, 531-32 (Fla. 2003)

(“[The Florida Supreme Court] does not have jurisdiction to review per curiam

decisions of the district courts of appeal that merely affirm with citations to

cases not pending review in [the court.]”); Beaty v. State, 701 So. 2d 856, 857

(Fla. 1997) (holding that where the District Court of Appeal issues an opinion

with a citation to a case or cases that are not pending before the Florida

Supreme Court, the time for filing a rule 3.850 motion begins to run from the

time that the District Court issues its mandate and is not affected by a petition

before the Florida Supreme Court seeking discretionary review.).

                                       2