Court Opinion

ID: 8478233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:53:58.502797+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.510590
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Jefferson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion properly construed as one for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jefferson, No. 3:00-cr-00221-REP-1 (EJD.Va. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision process.
AFFIRMED.