Court Opinion

ID: 5925379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:46:07.663526+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:34.339922
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered March 12, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). It is well settled that resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Additionally, the defendant’s challenge to the propriety of the trial court’s justification charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Richardson, 151 AD2d 617; People v Henegan, 150 AD2d 606; People v Douglas, 149 AD2d 613). The claim, in any event, is devoid of merit since the trial court’s instructions neither shifted nor otherwise diluted the People’s burden of proof.
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim regarding the severity of the sentence imposed, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.