Court Opinion

ID: 9520986
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 01:54:38.366697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:25.444301
License: Public Domain

YOUNG, Judge,
dissenting in part.
I dissent in part and concur in part. I dissent from Vaughan's conviction of intimidation while armed. There is no evidence of intimidation. Vaughan may have committed attempted battery but there is nothing in the record that he communicated any threat to force anyone to do or refrain *380from doing anything. This is fundamental error which should require reversal of that count. Meredith v. State, (1982) Ind.App., 439 N.E.2d 204.
As to theft, I concur with the majority.