Court Opinion

ID: 991699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:40:43.188372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.963854
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7261

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RICHARD JOHN DAVIS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-256-A, CA-96-642-AM)

Submitted:   February 27, 1997            Decided:   March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin David Miller, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas
More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's Motion for Summary Reversal; we deny a certificate of

appealability; and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-93-256-A; CA-96-

642-AM (E.D. Va. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2