Court Opinion

ID: 9889728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-11 14:00:58.411956+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.153465
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-1951    Document: 49    Page: 1   Filed: 10/11/2023

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

                JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN,
                         Appellant

                            v.

                     NEENAH, INC.,
                         Appellee
                  ______________________

            2022-1951, 2022-1952, 2022-1953
                ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
 01361, IPR2020-01363, IPR2021-00016.
                  ______________________

                       JUDGMENT
                  ______________________

     DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan & Dawson
 PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also repre-
 sented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J.
 ROBBENNOLT.

    JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
 LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented
 by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San
 Francisco, CA.
                ______________________
Case: 22-1951      Document: 49   Page: 2   Filed: 10/11/2023

  THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

  ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

      PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and
  CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                          ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 11, 2023
     Date