Court Opinion

ID: 9882345
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-05 21:00:30.728764+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:20.415615
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6225      Doc: 10         Filed: 10/04/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6225

        KRISTOPHER DOMINIC JACOBS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, Medical Provider; NURSE
        NOOM, LPN or RN,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01216-LMB-IDD)

        Submitted: September 28, 2023                                     Decided: October 4, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kristopher Dominic Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6225         Doc: 10      Filed: 10/04/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Kristopher Dominic Jacobs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42

        U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). * We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

        order. Jacobs v. Armor Corr. Health Servs., No. 1:22-cv-01216-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb.

        9, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

               *
                Because the district court did not afford Jacobs leave to amend, the dismissal order,
        although without prejudice, is a final, appealable order. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790,
        796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).
                                                     2