Court Opinion

ID: 1005800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:01:44.966296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:49.242848
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONALD WILLIAM HALL,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-99-76, CA-01-53-7-F)

Submitted:   October 17, 2001             Decided:   November 8, 2001

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald William Hall, Appellant Pro Se.   Michael Gordon James,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronald William Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Hall, Nos. CR-99-76; CA-

01-53-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2