Court Opinion

ID: 1000918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:47:58.504835+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.859216
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

IAN KILBURN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-97-39, CA-98-1387-2)

Submitted:     February 8, 2000          Decided:    February 22, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ian Kilburn, Appellant Pro Se.    Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ian Kilburn seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).     We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     See United States v. Kilburn, Nos. CR-97-39; CA-98-1387-2

(E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                   2