Court Opinion

ID: 995429
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:37:15.13022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:44.575459
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6076

BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LARRY W. HUFFMAN, Director,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-97-747-R)

Submitted:   June 16, 1998                  Decided:   June 30, 1998

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v.

Huffman, No. CA-97-747-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 9 and Dec. 17, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2