Court Opinion

ID: 994157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:18:30.865729+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:56.621155
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 97-7017

JOHN EDWARD KUPLEN,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

JANET RENO; MICHAEL EASLEY,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-97-264-5-CT-BR2)

Submitted:   January 22, 1998            Decided:   February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edward Kuplen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Kuplen v. Reno, No. CA-97-264-5-CT-BR2 (E.D.N.C.
June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2