Court Opinion

ID: 9775943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 19:13:39.002705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:32.263534
License: Public Domain

DODSON, Justice,
concurring.
I agree that transactions between Module and Estelline, and Module and Farm Credit were not “second sale” under the Certificate of Title Act, that each transaction is governed by the Texas Commerce & Business Code Ann. section 2.403(b) and section 1.201(9) (i.e., definition of “buyer in the ordinary course of business”); and that Estelline and Farm Credit failed to conclusively establish that they are “buyers in the ordinary course of (in) business.” I agree that summary judgment should be reversed and the cause should be remanded to the trial court.