Court Opinion

ID: 7873542
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 20:57:10.151549+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:30.090166
License: Public Domain

Syllabus by the Court
Habeas corpus petitioner alleging failure of parole authorities to follow applicable procedures in denying parole is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his allegations where it is not clear as a matter of law from the pleadings that he is not entitled to relief.
Petitioner is serving a 40-year prison term for second-degree murder to which he pled guilty in district court approximately 20 years ago. His petition for habeas corpus alleges basically that applicable procedures were not followed by prison authorities in denying him parole. Since habeas corpus is available as a means of reviewing *Page 856 
these allegations and since it is not clear as a matter of law from the pleadings that petitioner is not entitled to relief, we reverse the order denying the petition without an evidentiary hearing and we remand for such a hearing.Kelsey v. State, 283 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 1979).
Reversed and remanded.