Court Opinion

ID: 8271298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:33:20.235921+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:31.634257
License: Public Domain

Garrison, J.
I concur in the above exposition of the law, but I do not think that the money, to wit, the sum of $80 paid to the married woman to obtain her signature to the note, was “ money obtained by her on the faith of her contract.”
For affirmance—Magie (Chancellor), Dixon, Lippinoott, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Voorhees. 7.
For reversal—Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Garrison, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 6.