Court Opinion

ID: 1012891
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:52:18.592643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:20.881312
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 04-6290

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARY ANN SAAR, Acting Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
03-517-8-PJM)

Submitted:   March 25, 2004                 Decided:   April 2, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton,
Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.        We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court.           See Pearson v.

Saar, No. CA-03-517-8-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2004). We dispense with

oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -