Court Opinion

ID: 8635796
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:45:01.306688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:55.324188
License: Public Domain

OPINION OP THE COURT. This is an action for the violation of a patent-right. The defendant filed a special plea, setting up that the right was not in the plaintiff; a previous discovery; and that the right was of no value. And a question was raised whether a special plea could be filed, or whether the plaintiff was not bound to plead the general issue and give notice as authorized by the statute. The court held that a special plea may be filed. That a right to plead the general issue, and give notice by the statute, was an enlargement of the defendant’s mode of defence, but that it did not take away his right to plead specially. But the court held also, that as the plea was not put in thirty days before the term, the plaintiff was entitled to a continuance. The statute provides that the notice under the general issue shall be filed thirty days before the term. This entitles the plaintiff to the thirty days whether the matter be set up by a plea or notice.