Court Opinion

ID: 9829902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:42:56.548143+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:08.575871
License: Public Domain

on motion for rehearing.
Appellant earnestly insists that we erred on the original hearing in 'holding 'that evidence of the purchase price paid by appellee for the horses in controversy near Carlsbad, Hew Mexico, a few days before they were shipped, was properly excluded. Exactly the same question was decided by this court adversely to appellant’s contention in the cases of Texas & P. Ry. v. Dishman, 41 Texas Civ. App., 250 (91 S. W., 828), and Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Garrett, 96 S. W., 53, in each of which cases a writ of error was denied by our Supreme Court, and the decision in the case of Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Dilworth, 95 Texas, 332, is to the same effect.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Affirmed.

Writ of error refused.