Court Opinion

ID: 3857339
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:43:25.482748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:49.740310
License: Public Domain

Argued March 14, 1928.
On one side are the cases in which it appears that owners of motor vehicles occasionally, or as incidental to general occupation, transport passengers for hire (Harder v. Public Service Commission, 90 Pa. Super. 373, and Frantz v. Public Service Commission, 93 Pa. Super. 416 this day decided, are examples); and on the other are those in which such owners hold themselves out generally as ready and willing to carry all who apply (of which Erb v. Public Service Commission, 93 Pa. Super. 421, also this day decided, is an example); the former are not common carriers within the Public Service Company Law, and the latter are.
The evidence in this record shows clearly that appellant belongs to the second class. He testified that for about two years he had been engaged in the Borough of Minersville generally in hiring his motorbus to carry groups of persons. That business grew until between March 19, 1927 and the following July 21, he made thirty-eight trips of that kind. "Q. In other words, as I understand you, anybody that wants to hire this bus can hire it to go from point to point for a certain fixed sum of money? A. Yes, sir......" "Q. In other words you have been hiring your bus [with a driver] wherever you could get anybody to hire it. It didn't make any difference from what point it started, did it? A. No, sir." Such holding out brings the service within the reach of the Public Service Company law. Nothing need be added to the discussion of the subject contained in the three cases referred to above.
Order affirmed at appellant's costs. *Page 432