Court Opinion

ID: 9929730
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-03 21:00:45.513737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:43:08.488283
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1998      Doc: 8        Filed: 02/02/2024     Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1998

        SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:22-cv-04143-RMG)

        Submitted: January 30, 2024                                       Decided: February 2, 2024

        Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Samuel T. Whatley, II, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN LAW
        FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1998      Doc: 8         Filed: 02/02/2024      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Samuel T. Whatley, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the

        recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant Waffle House Inc.’s

        motion for summary judgment in Whatley’s action alleging violations of the Fair Labor

        Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

        error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whatley v. Waffle House, Inc.,

        No. 2:22-cv-04143-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2