Court Opinion

ID: 2739739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-03 19:01:22.54636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:29:45.396701
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-3085        Document: 24           Page: 1       Filed: 10/03/2014

                 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                      ______________________

                    JIMMI TYLER REBISH,
                          Petitioner,

                                      v.

       MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
                    Respondent.
               ______________________

                            2014-3085
                      ______________________

    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
 Board in No. SF-1221-13-0494-W-1.

     ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                    JIMMI TYLER REBISH,
                          Petitioner,

                                      v.

       MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
                    Respondent.
               ______________________

                            2014-3087
                      ______________________
Case: 14-3085       Document: 24   Page: 2   Filed: 10/03/2014

 2                                            REBISH   v. MSPB

    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
 Board in No. SF-0752-13-0362-I-1.

                    ______________________

                        ON MOTION
                    ______________________
                         PER CURIAM.
                          ORDER
     Jimmi Tyler Rebish moves to reconsider his “prior
 motions” in the above-captioned petitions for review. In
 particular, Rebish asks the court to reconsider its July 18,
 2014 order denying his request to transfer to the Federal
 Mediation and Conciliation Service or the U.S. Depart-
 ment of the Interior’s Office of Collaborative Action and
 Dispute Resolution. Rebish also requests a 90-day stay of
 proceedings so he can obtain legal counsel.
     The court notes that the order for which Rebish seeks
 reconsideration was issued on July 18, 2014. Because
 Rebish’s motion for reconsideration is untimely, the court
 will not consider the merits of the motion. See Fed. Cir.
 R. 27(l).
     Accordingly,
     IT IS ORDERED THAT:
     (1) The motion for reconsideration is denied.
      (2) Rebish’s motion for a stay is granted to the extent
 that he may file his reply briefs within 90 days of the date
 of filing of this order. No further extensions should be
 anticipated.
Case: 14-3085        Document: 24   Page: 3   Filed: 10/03/2014

  REBISH   v. MSPB                                            3

                                      FOR THE COURT

                                      /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                      Clerk of Court

 s30