Court Opinion

ID: 209971
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-13 08:02:00+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:27:59.035195
License: Public Domain

MOORE, Circuit Judge.
 

  PowerOasis, Inc. and PowerOasis Networks, LLC (PowerOasis) raise a number of claim construction arguments on appeal following the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts’s grant of summary judgment that claims 15, 18, 31,
   
   *965
   
  35, 38, 40, and 49 of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,466,658 (’658 patent) and 6,721,400 (’400 patent) are not infringed by Wayport, Inc. We
  
   vacate
  
  and
  
   remand.
  

  We need not discuss the specifics of PowerOasis’s arguments because of our decision in
  
   PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
  
  522 F.3d 1299 (Fed.Cir.2008), which holds claims 15, 18, 31, 35, 38, 40, and 49 of the '658 and '400 patents invalid. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement and remand with instructions for the district court to enter judgment consistent with our holding that claims 15, 18, 31, 35, 38, 40, and 49 of the '658 and '400 patents are invalid.