Court Opinion

ID: 2543441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:18:00.166508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:47.646477
License: Public Domain

358 S.W.3d 588 (2012)
Jake MITCHELL, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96860.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
February 14, 2012.
Brocca Smith, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. MacKelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Jake Mitchell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).