Court Opinion

ID: 8237121
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 03:37:14.630798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:36.936868
License: Public Domain

Hill, C. J. 1. The petition in. a bail-trover suit described specifically each article of property sought to be recovered, but failed to give the value of each article, giving the aggregate value of all the articles described. Meld, that the value of the articles was sufficiently stated, and a demurrer to the petition because the value of each separate article was not given was properly overruled.2. The property sought to be recovered in a bail-trover suit was transferred to the plaintiff by the defendant as security for the payment of a promissory note, under § 3306 of the Civil Code (1910). On the trial the defendant offered to prove that before the note matured, and before any demand was made on him for the delivery of the property sued for (several head of cattle), the cattle had died, and that this fact was known by the plaintiff when he brought the suit; and the trial judge refused to allow the proof. Meld, error. To maintain trover, the plaintiff must show title, or the right of possession, in himself, and possession or conversion by the defendant. The testimony offered was competent evidence to disprove both possession and conversion by the defendant. Civil Code (1910), § 4483.4. The plaintiff’s remedy was suit on the note. Judgment reversed.