Court Opinion

ID: 2896328
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:42:50.424165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:44.801502
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0414-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 10, 2008

______________________________

GEORGE CHAPMAN AND KAREN CHAPMAN, APPELLANTS

v.

ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 251
ST
 DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 57,624-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellants George and Karen Chapman filed a motion to dismiss their appeal on December 8, 2008.  The motion includes a certificate of conference indicating appellee Allstate Texas Lloyds is not opposed to the motion.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  The motion does not indicate an agreement of the parties with regard to the distribution of costs of the appeal.  We therefore tax costs of the appeal against appellants.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

Justice