Court Opinion

ID: 2855626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-04 18:46:48.483614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:18.037401
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-281-CV

BRETT ARNOLD AND PATRICIA	APPELLANTS

A. RUDDER

V.

B.R. ISRAEL	APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(footnote: 1)

------------

On July 20, 2009, appellants filed their brief with this court.  Appellants’ brief was defective because it failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k)(1), and 9.4(h), and Local Rules 1.A and 1.E, Second Court of Appeals Local Rules.
(footnote: 2) 

On July 20, 2009, the court instructed appellants to file an amended brief by July 30, 2009, to cure the defects.  The court’s letter notified appellants that failure to file an amended brief in compliance with rules of appellate procedure 38 and 9, and Local Rule 1, “may result in striking the brief you filed, waiver of noncomplying points, or dismissal of the appeal.”
(footnote: 3) 

Appellants filed an amended brief that is defective because it fails to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(h), (i), (k)(1), and 9.4(h), and Local Rule 1.A, Second Court of Appeals Local Rules.
(footnote: 4) 

Only “substantial compliance” with the briefing rules is required.
(footnote: 5)  If we determine that the briefing rules have been “flagrantly violated,” however, we may require an appellant to amend, supplement, or redraw the brief.
(footnote: 6)  If the appellant does not file another brief that complies with the rules of appellate procedure, we may strike the brief, prohibit the party from filing another, and proceed as if the party had failed to file a brief.
(footnote: 7) 

Because appellants have been given notice of the defects in their brief 

and because they have failed to cure those defects, we strike their brief and amended brief and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
(footnote: 8) 

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  August 26, 2009

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k)(1), 9.4(h); 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1.

3:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3.

4:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(h), (i), (k)(1), 9.4(h); 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1.

5:Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. 

6:Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). 

7:Id.

8:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).