Court Opinion

ID: 9857520
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 14:53:24.748323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:46.092095
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
McGEE, Justice.
Aetna, in its motion for rehearing, correctly points out that this case should be remanded to the trial court.
Both parties moved for summary judgment in the trial court. Although Kelly has assigned as error the granting of Aetna’s motion for summary judgment, it has not properly preserved the error of the trial court in failing to grant its motion for summary judgment. The amount of damages also must be determined. Therefore, we cannot render judgment, but must remand the case to the trial court. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. v. McBride, 159 Tex. 442, 322 S.W.2d 492 (1958); Farah Mfg. Co. v. Continental Airlines, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1975, writ ref’d n.r.e.).
Respondent’s motion for rehearing is granted in part. The judgments of the courts below are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court.
GONZALEZ, J., not sitting.