Court Opinion

ID: 839216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 21:45:54.132267+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:42:39.143156
License: Public Domain

751 N.W.2d 41 (2008)
Ernie MORGAN and Kathy Morgan, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MENASHA CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Fairhaven Wood Harvesting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
D & K Chips and Gwen Knight a/k/a Gwen Digby, Third-Party Defendants.
Docket No. 135861. COA No. 272837.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
July 2, 2008.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the November 15, 2007 judgment remanding this case to the Allegan Circuit Court "for entry of judgment in favor of [the third-party defendant] Fairhaven [Wood Harvesting, Inc.]." We do not disturb the Court of Appeals ruling concerning third-party plaintiff Menasha Corporation's argument under Article 9 of the Chip Purchase Agreement. But the third-party complaint further alleged that the third-party defendant breached its obligation under Article 10 of the Chip Purchase Agreement to procure and maintain insurance coverage. Because the circuit court has not yet resolved this aspect of the third-party complaint, we REMAND this case to the circuit court for *42 further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.