Court Opinion

ID: 4652308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-01-19 20:08:33.111572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:49.235630
License: Public Domain

People v Acosta (2021 NY Slip Op 00241)

People v Acosta

2021 NY Slip Op 00241

Decided on January 14, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: January 14, 2021

Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Singh, Mendez, JJ. 

Ind No. 2221/16 Appeal No. 12859 Case No. 2019-1345 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vKelvi Acosta, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Morgan Namian of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered October 17, 2018,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: January 14, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.