Court Opinion

ID: 2899944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 00:20:25.799625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:30.088853
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0279-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                       AT AMARILLO

                                          PANEL B

                                  JANUARY 12, 2009
                           ______________________________

                        TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

                                                                         Appellant

                                              V.

                            GOETZ INSURORS, INC. AND
                        GOETZ INSURORS, INC., AS ASSIGNEE
                         OF THE CLAIMS OF CATTLECO, INC.,

                                                                         Appellees
                           ______________________________

             FROM THE 64th DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

          NO. A-10810-05-11; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING
                      _______________________________

                            ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                          _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

       Appellant Texas Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the final judgment of the

trial court. On August 11, 2008, the clerk’s record was filed. The reporter’s record was due

on October 15, 2008. No extension motion or reporter’s record was filed. On October 22,

2008, this court directed the court reporter by letter “to advise the Court of the status of the

reporter’s record on or before November 3, 2008." In response, the Court received a
motion for extension of time to file the record, which was granted to November 14, 2008.

No extension motion or record was filed by that date. On December 1, 2008, the Court

again notified the reporter that the record had not been filed and the reporter was asked

to provide the status of the record by December 10, 2008. On December 10, 2008, the

reporter filed her second extension motion requesting until January 12, 2009, to file the

record, which was granted. On January 5, 2009, this Court received the court reporter’s

third extension request asking for an additional thirty days to file the record.

       Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 64th District Court

of Swisher County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine:

              when the reporter’s record can reasonably be transcribed into
              written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay
              the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of
              depriving the appellant of their right to appeal.

       The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing, if any.       Additionally, the district court shall then file the

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this

court on or before February 11, 2009. Should further time be needed by the trial court to

perform these tasks, then same must be requested before February 11, 2009.

                                              2
      It is so ordered.

                              Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                          3