Court Opinion

ID: 8682282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:49:46.604281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:31.284758
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Samuel Hernandez-Calix has moyed for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Calix has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous, see 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.