Court Opinion

ID: 9642199
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 17:51:53.072197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:44.334902
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Behearing.
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, charging in its petition that the court misunderstood and therefore misstated certain chemical characteristics of the invention of the product claims of the patent, seeks a rehearing in the belief that a correct understanding and statement would lead the court to change its conclusions. As this is a serious criticism of a decision in an important ease — made with the utmost sincerity— we have given it careful consideration. It may be that in the complexity of the subject-matter of the invention certain of our statements were not, from a scientific standpoint, precisely accurate; yet, even so, the appel*651lant has not persuaded us that our understanding of the invention of the product claims is wrong and that, accordingly, it should be corrected by a reargument.
The petition for rehearing is denied.