Court Opinion

ID: 5656963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 00:02:28.860599+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:50.965161
License: Public Domain

PAULSEN, J. pro. tem.*
This is a companion to the case of McNeil v. City of Montague, 3 Civil No. 8301, ante, p. 326 [268 P.2d 498], this day decided.
Except as to parties plaintiff and the allegations of property damage the facts are identical and the allegations of the complaint are substantially the same.
On the authority of McNeil v. City of Montague the judgment is affirmed.
Peek, J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.