Court Opinion

ID: 9446107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 21:46:20.371405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:31.643403
License: Public Domain

BAZELON, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
The Commissioner of Patents says that “While the authority exists for the issuance of a single certificate for one mark properly registered in a pluralty of classes, that is, where the goods are different, that authority does not mean that plural registrations are properly is*863suable for the same goods merely because the goods are described as having different purposes or uses.” I think this construction of the applicable statutory provisions 1 is plainly permissible. I would therefore reverse the judgment of the District Court.

. Sections 1 and 30 of the Trademark Act of 1945, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1051 and 1112.