Court Opinion

ID: 8436088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 12:51:38.833021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:42.697854
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Maurice White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Balldown, No. CA-05-137-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED