Court Opinion

ID: 2922997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:25:40.050498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:07.347174
License: Public Domain

NUMBER13-06-440-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________  _______  

IN RE: JOE WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
___________________________________________________________  __      

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________________________________________________    _     

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 Relator, Joe Williamson Construction Company, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus on August 4, 2006.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the
petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response filed by real party in
interest Raymondville Independent School District, and relator's reply to the response
is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought.  See
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (providing that
an appeal can be taken from an interlocutory order of a district court that grants a
temporary injunction).  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
	Furthermore, on August 4, 2006, this Court granted relator's motion to stay the
trial court's order of July 17, 2006, setting the trial "on the 6th of Sept. 2006 at 9
o'clock a[.]m. with announcements on Aug. 31, 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m," in cause
number C-738-06-C in Hidalgo County. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby
lifted.
									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 18th day of September, 2006.