Court Opinion

ID: 994960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:30:32.688589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:30.148569
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7323

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOHN CHARLES KENNEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria.    T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-92-142-A, CA-96-1151-AM)

Submitted:   April 29, 1998                 Decided:   May 14, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Charles Kenney, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Ring, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Kenney, Nos. CR-92-142-A; CA-96-1151-AM
(E.D. Va. July 15, 1997) . We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2