Court Opinion

ID: 6866310
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:55:03.39307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:19.760223
License: Public Domain

HANEY, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I am unable to agree with either the reasoning or the conclusion expressed in the majority opinion with respect to the application of the Arizona statute of limitations to the facts in this case, and because I think that the law óf Iowa is determinative as to the time when the causes of action accrued,1 ******and with respect to the effect of partial payments,21 dissent.

 Scudder v. Union National Bank, 91 U.S. 406, 23 L.Ed. 245; Glenn v. Liggett, 135 U.S. 533, 10 S.Ct. 867, 34 L.Ed. 262; Gassaway v. Hopkins, 38 Tenn. (1 Head) 583; Crofoot v. Thatcher, 19 Utah, 212, 57 P. 171, 75 Am.St.Rep. 725; Sterrett v. Sweeney, 15 Idaho, 416, 98 P. 418, 20 L.R.A.(N.S.) 963, 128 Am.St.Rep. 68.

 Sterrett v. Sweeney, supra; Theis v. Wood, 238 Mo. 643, 142 S.W. 431. Compare: Obear v. First Nat. Bank, 97 Ga. 587, 25 S.E. 335, 33 L.R.A. 284; Tilliard v. Hall, 11 Tex.Civ.App. 381, 32 S.W. 863.