Court Opinion

ID: 4404838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-06-07 20:00:19.642141+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:31.616643
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-40946      Document: 00514987485        Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/07/2019

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                   United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 18-40946
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   June 7, 2019
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                          Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO POSADA-JUAREZ, Also Known as Armando Juarez-Posada,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 7:18-CR-979-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Posada-

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-40946    Document: 00514987485    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/07/2019

                                No. 18-40946

Juarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Posada-Juarez has not filed a response.

      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2