Court Opinion

ID: 9489221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 13:09:21.161992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:53:24.252775
License: Public Domain

ORDER
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having *74been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
MERRITT, C.J., filed a separate dissent in which MARTIN, J., joined.