Court Opinion

ID: 8423846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 00:01:41.214886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:28.247298
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Marco Antonio Pena-Navarro appeals his 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. He originally pleaded guilty to illegal reentry by a previously convicted felon, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pena-Navarro’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.