Court Opinion

ID: 2926263
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:26:32.175293+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:11.685209
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00397-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________

DEBORAH LYNN DAVIS,                                                         APPELLANT,

                                             v.

RONALD DWAYNE DAVIS,                              APPELLEE.
_____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 418th District Court
                 of Montgomery County, Texas.
______________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

                   Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Deborah Lynn Davis, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered

against her in favor of appellee, Ronald Dwayne Davis. On July 20, 2009, the Clerk of this

Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on

July 13, 2009, and that the deputy district clerk, Bobbye Miller, had notified this Court that
appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this

Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if

it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       On August 7, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was delinquent

in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       Appellant has failed to failed to respond to this Court’s notices and has failed to pay

the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                   PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 1st day of October, 2009.

                                               2