Court Opinion

ID: 704277
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:58:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:09.439095
License: Public Domain

66 F.3d 315
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Thomas Edward CLARK, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Elizabeth T. CARTER;  Edward W. Murray;  David K. Smith;Lieutenant Townsend;  F.A. Manns, Sergeant;  J. Morris,Sergeant;  Officer Stanley, Corrections Officer;  OfficerWoods, Corrections Officer;  Sergeant Zumbro;  Doctor Carey;John Does, 1 through 10, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6782.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Aug. 24, 1995.Decided:  Sept. 15, 1995.

Thomas Edward Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Clark v. Carter, No. CA-95-342-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 18, 1995;  May 5, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED