Court Opinion

ID: 9476988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 06:10:39.402111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:45:37.382079
License: Public Domain

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I join in the majority opinion completely, but am constrained to add a caveat. As the author of that portion of the opinion in Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania, 762 F.2d 272, 281-82 (3d Cir.1985), approving the use of the contingency factor that was reversed in *326Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, — U.S.—, 107 S.Ct. 3078, 97 L.Ed.2d 585 (1987), I am a little uneasy about permitting a contingency enhancement here. I know the adage “once burned, twice shy,” but shy I am not and twice I may be burned.