Court Opinion

ID: 8676504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:26:14.589315+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.307923
License: Public Domain

*193Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harald Schmidt seeks to appeal the district court’s order consolidating his two civil actions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 545^6, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Schmidt seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.