Court Opinion

ID: 2684241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-17 16:00:33.107827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:52.567739
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 13-3726
                    ___________________________

                          Sherman Ray Meirovitz

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                       v.

               Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI - Forrest City

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                  ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
                              ____________

                         Submitted: July 14, 2014
                          Filed: July 17, 2014
                             [Unpublished]
                             ____________

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Sherman Meirovitz appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition, in which he raised the same claim that was rejected by this court in
his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See Meirovitz v. United States, 688 F.3d 369, 370-
72 (8th Cir. 2012). After careful review, we agree with the district court that
Meirovitz did not show the section 2255 remedy was inadequate or ineffective. See
Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________

      1
        The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H.
David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-