Court Opinion

ID: 2773307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-01-26 20:09:38.979214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:27:49.835782
License: Public Domain

Matter of Esmeldyn P. (2015 NY Slip Op 00644)

Matter of Esmeldyn P.

2015 NY Slip Op 00644

Decided on January 27, 2015

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 27, 2015

Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Richter, Clark, JJ.

14057

[*1] In re Esmeldyn P., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. 
Presentment Agency

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Francis F. Caputo of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about November 20, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts) and assault in the third degree, and also committed the act of unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16, and placed him on probation for a period of 14 months, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the finding as to assault in the third degree and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The court's fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348—349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations. The evidence, including testimony that defendant stabbed an unarmed person who was walking away from an altercation, disproved appellant's justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
To the extent that appellant is challenging an evidentiary ruling made by the court, we find that claim to be unavailing, and that it would not, in any event, warrant a different result regarding the sufficiency and weight of the evidence.
As the presentment agency concedes, appellant is entitled to dismissal of the third-degree assault count as a lesser included offense of second-degree assault.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 26, 2015
CLERK