Court Opinion

ID: 8624445
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:31:02.210011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:36.182231
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Paul H. Noe appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Noe v. Director of Social Security Admin., No. 5:06-ct-03072-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2007; Apr. 26, 2007). We deny Noe’s motion for class certification and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.