Court Opinion

ID: 2979656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-22 18:55:36.390993+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:44:18.307972
License: Public Domain

Abatement Order filed May 19, 2015

                                       In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals
                           NO. 14-14-00665-CV
                     DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, Appellant

                                          V.

            HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

                    On Appeal from the 234th District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 2013-12988

                             ABATEMENT ORDER

      After a non-jury trial, appellant brings this appeal from a judgment signed
April 30, 2014. Appellant timely requested findings of fact and conclusions of law
and timely reminded the trial court when the findings and conclusions were
overdue. The trial court did not file the requested findings and conclusions. On
April 30, 2015, appellant asked this court to order the trial court to find findings of
fact and conclusions of law.

      When an appellant timely files a request for findings of fact and conclusions
of law and a timely notice of past due findings, the trial court’s error in failing to
file findings of fact and conclusions of law is generally presumed to be harmful,
unless the record before the appellate court affirmatively shows that the
complaining party has suffered no injury. See Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Magallanes,
763 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Tex. 1989); Electronic Power Design, Inc., v. R.A. Hanson
Co., Inc., 821 S.W.2d 170, 171 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no writ).

      Appellant avers in his motion that he cannot properly present or frame its
issues without the findings and conclusions. In this case, therefore, we cannot say
that the record affirmatively discloses no injury. Because the trial judge continues
to serve on the district court, the error in this case is remediable. See Tex. R. App.
P. 44.4. The proper remedy is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to
correct its error. See Zeiba v. Martin, 928 S.W.2d 782, 786 (Tex. App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 1996, no writ). We ORDER the trial court to file findings of fact and
conclusions of law on or before June 18, 2015. Within ten days after the trial
court has filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, any party may file a request
for specified additional or amended findings or conclusions. The trial court shall
file any additional or amended findings that are appropriate within ten days after
such a request is filed. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and
any additional and amended findings or conclusions, shall be included in a
supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this court on or before July 20, 2015.

      The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will
also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or
the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

      It is so ORDERED.

                                 PER CURIAM