Court Opinion

ID: 2879994
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 05:36:43.012942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:11.418565
License: Public Domain

i          i        i                                                                   i       i      i

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                              Nos. 04-09-00301-CR & 04-09-00302-CR

                                        Nicholas ALDERETE,
                                              Appellant

                                                   v.

                                           STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                        Trial Court Nos. 2008-CR-0236A & 2008-CR-0237A
                           Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
                  Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 12, 2009

DISMISSED

           Pursuant to plea-bargain agreements, appellant Nicholas Alderete pled nolo contendere to

the offenses of aggravated robbery in trial court cause numbers 2008-CR-0236A and 2008-CR-

0237A, and was sentenced in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreements. In each case,

the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2).
                                                                      04-09-00301-CR & 04-09-00302-CR

       Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) provides that “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if

a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record

under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Thus, this court, after consolidating the appeals, warned

Alderete his appeals would be dismissed unless amended trial court certifications showing he had

the right of appeal were made part of the appellate records. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174,

177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court

certifications have been filed. However, Alderete’s appellate counsel has filed letters in each case

stating she has reviewed the appellate records and this court has no choice but to dismiss the appeals.

We agree with Alderete’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss the appeals.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

                                                               PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                  -2-