Court Opinion

ID: 8434917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 11:14:38.330812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:41.557907
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Graciela Zamudio-Galvan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal for lack of ten years continuous physical presence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
Zamudio-Galvan concedes that she traveled from the United States to Mexico to *870visit her mother on or about May 5, 1996, and returned to the United States without inspection on or about March 20, 1997. Zamudio-Galvan contends, however, that she did not “depart” the United States because she did not leave the United States with the intention of abandoning her residence in this country. This contention founders on the plain language of the statute, which, without any requirement for scienter, unambiguously states that “an alien shall be considered to have failed to maintain continuous physical presence in the United States ... if the alien has departed ... for any period in excess of 90 days....” 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.