Court Opinion

ID: 9526570
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:20:04.007518+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:20:34.665568
License: Public Domain

Loring, Chief Justice
(concurring specially).
Since defendant is asking only for a new trial and is contending only that the case was for the jury on whether Schmit was, at the time of impact, the servant of plaintiff, I agree that there should be a reversal; but I regard the evidence of a master-servant relationship at the moment of impact as conclusive, not that it should be submitted to a jury. The evidence is all one way and undisputed. There was no conflict as to the controlling facts nor as to the inferences that might be drawn therefrom.
Mr. Justice Christianson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.