Court Opinion

ID: 568264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:53.508922
License: Public Domain

944 F.2d 903
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Hubert James WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Danny KLEIN, Sergeant Stonebreaker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7060.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 27, 1991.Decided Sept. 23, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.  (CA-90-2273-HM)
Hubert James Williams, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Hubert James Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Williams v. Klein, CA-90-2273-HM (D.Md. Mar. 6, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.