Court Opinion

ID: 5285461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 07:05:01.107578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:37.083779
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Melvin Hill appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 *666motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014.