Court Opinion

ID: 9616691
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:48:59.177197+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:00.288777
License: Public Domain

*387Judge Hedrick,
dissenting:
The majority opinion fairly summarizes plaintiff’s testimony. Without elaborating on the circumstances surrounding the taking of her testimony, or the contradictions, discrepancies, and equivocations contained therein, I am of the opinion that plaintiff’s testimony is not so unequivocal as to require that a directed verdict be entered against her and in favor of the defendant Cogdill, whether her testimony be characterized as a judicial admission, a repudiation of her claim against her husband, or a voluntary dismissal. See McCormick, Evidence, § 266, 2d ed. pp. 636-639.
I vote to affirm.