Court Opinion

ID: 5739684
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:39:38.973883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:02.786138
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered December 6, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and failure to wear a safety belt in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1229-c (3), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Smith, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
*712The credibility determinations of a hearing court are accorded great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Umadat, 29 AD3d 830 [2006]; People v Cameron, 6 AD3d 546 [2004]; People v Jakins, 277 AD2d 328 [2000]). The record supports the hearing court’s determination to credit the testimony of a state trooper that he was able to observe that the defendant was not wearing a safety belt in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1229-c (3) (see People v Umadat, 29 AD3d 830 [2006]; People v James, 19 AD3d 617, 618 [2005]). This observation, as distinguished from mere pretext (see People v David, 223 AD2d 551 [1996]; People v Smith, 181 AD2d 802, 803 [1992]), justified the trooper’s stop of the vehicle (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806, 810 [1996]; People v Robinson, 97 NY2d 341, 349 [2001]; People v Robinson, 38 AD3d 572, 573 [2007]). Accordingly, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.