Court Opinion

ID: 4370079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-22 07:33:52.35337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:14.087361
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                         FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                    ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name:        In the Interest of C.B. and M.B., Children

Appellate case number:      01-18-01086-CV

Trial court case number:    2018-04586J

Trial court:                315th District Court of Harris County

        Appellant, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (“DFPS”),
timely filed a notice of appeal on December 4, 2018, from the sanctions order signed by
the trial court on November 19, 2018, which was later amended on December 19, 2018.
On January 7, 2019, DFPS filed a copy of a request to the district clerk to file a
supplemental clerk’s record containing the amended order and other documents, and DFPS
filed an amended notice of appeal on January 23, 2019. On January 22, 2019, the court
reporter was granted an extension of time until February 21, 2019, to file the reporter’s
record because her information sheet stated that no fee payment had been received from
DFPS. Then the Clerk of this Court’s January 22, 2019 notice warned DFPS that this Court
may require it to file a brief without the reporter’s record if that record fee had not been
paid by February 21, 2019, and that if DFPS believed that it was exempt, it should file an
explanation by that deadline.

       On January 24, 2019, DFPS filed this “Motion to Acknowledge Department’s
Exemption From Payment of Any Court Cost or Fee in this Proceeding, Including for Court
Reporter Fees.” DFPS contended that Section 40.062 of the Human Resource Code
exempts it from having “to pay any cost or fee otherwise imposed for court proceedings or
other services, including” a “Court reporter fee imposed by Section 51.601, Government
Code.” TEX. HUM. RES. CODE ANN. § 40.062(3) (West 2013). On January 29, 2019,
appellees, M.B. and M.D.B., filed a response in opposition. Appellees contend that DFPS
promised to pay the court reporter and it only recently claimed that it is exempt, but that it
should not be exempted under Human Resources Code Section 40.062(3). Appellees assert
that Government Code Section 51.601 does not apply to the reporter’s record fee and,
instead, applies to the “court reporter service fee of $15 as a court cost in each civil case
filed with the clerk to maintain a court reporter who is available for assignment in the
court.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.601(a) (West 2013).

        However, although the supplemental clerk’s record has not been filed yet, the
original clerk’s record was already filed on December 13, 2018, without advance payment
of the record fee. As a governmental department of this state, DFPS “may not be required
to file a bond for court costs . . . for an appeal . . . taken out by the [governmental] entity
or officer . . . in a civil suit.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 6.001(a), (b)(2) (West
2002) (emphasis added); see also In re State Bd. for Educator Certification, 452 S.W.3d
802, 808 (Tex. 2014) (“CPRC section 6.001 simply restates settled law that the State may
appeal without filing a bond.”). This means that DFPS is exempt from the bond
requirement and is allowed to supersede the sanctions order by filing a notice of appeal
without filing a bond for court costs. See Ammex Warehouse Co. v. Archer, 381 S.W.2d
478, 485 (Tex. 1964) (“The State has a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing
a bond upon perfecting its appeal by giving proper notice.”); see also In re Long, 984
S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding).

       The standard General Information form issued by the Clerk of this Court in all civil
appeals states that “[a]ll civil motions must include a certificate of conference, . . . and
require a $10 filing fee, unless the movant has established indigence or is exempt from the
advance payment of filing fees, e.g., the State or a political subdivision of the State.” Gen.
Info. Ltr., dated Dec. 14, 2018, at 3 (emphasis added). The General Information form cites
to an attorney general opinion which explains that “section 6.001 of the Civil Practice and
Remedies Code only exempts the state from advance payment of filing fees and other court
costs but does not exempt it from ultimately paying such costs.” Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No.
DM-459 (Dec. 12, 1997), 1997 WL 770719, at *2 (emphasis added) (citing, inter alia,
Rodeheaver v. Alridge, 601 S.W.2d 51, 54 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1980, writ
ref’d n.r.e.)). Thus, because appellate record fees are part of “court costs . . . for an appeal,”
DFPS is exempt from advance payment for the clerk’s record, the appellate filing, and the
reporter’s record fees. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 6.001(a), (b)(2).

       Accordingly, the Court grants DFPS’s motion and the Clerk of this Court is
directed to mark DFPS exempt in this Court’s records and allowed to proceed without
advance payment of the appellate filing, clerk’s record, and reporter’s record fees. The
Court ORDERS the district clerk to file the supplemental clerk’s record, and the court
reporter, Cara Massey, to file the reporter’s record, both within 20 days of the date of this
Order, without advance payment from DFPS. Costs of preparing these records will be
assessed upon issuance of this Court’s opinion and judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

      It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley________
                   ☒ Acting individually
Date: ____February 21, 2019___

                                                2