Court Opinion

ID: 6041495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 13:52:28.322519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:14.787567
License: Public Domain

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree and affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Erie County Court (Perla, J.). We add only that the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing does not support the argument of defendant that he was in custody as a result of being asked to wait while a police officer searched the area for drugs. The officer’s request that defendant wait did not result in a significant interruption of defendant’s liberty of movement (see, People v Bora, 83 NY2d 531, 534). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that defendant possessed a controlled substance with intent to sell it (see, People v Hernandez, 71 NY2d 233, 245). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J.— Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.