Court Opinion

ID: 681229
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:37:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:21.721511
License: Public Domain

38 F.3d 1219NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Larry Eugene GRESHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-30446.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 17, 1994.*Decided Oct. 21, 1994.

Before:  BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Larry Eugene Gresham appeals his conviction and sentence of 168 months, imposed following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1), 846.

3
Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gresham's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3