Court Opinion

ID: 4695675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-15 16:10:41.122632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:54.332585
License: Public Domain

People v Crum (2021 NY Slip Op 03817)

People v Crum

2021 NY Slip Op 03817

Decided on June 15, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 15, 2021

Before: Renwick, J.P., Kern, Singh, Moulton, JJ. 

Ind No. 623/12 Appeal No. 14055 Case No. 2019-04508 

[*1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent, 
vMichael Crum, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Barbara Zolot of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Victoria Muth of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Kevin McGrath, J.), rendered June 16, 2017
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: June 15, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.