Court Opinion

ID: 623613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-25 01:04:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:54.471172
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             FEB 24 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-30062

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:10-cr-05373-RBL

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
NELSON VILLEGAS MARTINEZ,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Washington
                    Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

                                                         **
                           Submitted February 21, 2012

Before:        FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

       Nelson Villegas Martinez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-

month sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
738 (1967), Villegas Martinez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro

se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Villegas Martinez’s

conviction. We dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid appeal

waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the appeal of the sentence is

DISMISSED.

                                          2                                      11-30062