Court Opinion

ID: 149635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-06-28 19:34:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:34.716898
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 10-6551

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

BROOKS JAMES TERRELL,

                Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.   Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1)

Submitted:   June 17, 2010                       Decided:   June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and    KING,     Circuit   Judges,    and   HAMILTON,   Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Brooks     James    Terrell       appeals     the   district   court’s

order    denying     relief    on   his   18     U.S.C.    § 3582(c)(2)     (2006)

motion.     We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.        United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr-00610-

HMH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2010).                 We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED

                                          2