Court Opinion

ID: 2742061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-10-14 16:10:03.187299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:04:47.712201
License: Public Domain

Matter of Duell (2014 NY Slip Op 06907)
Matter of Duell
2014 NY Slip Op 06907
Decided on October 14, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on October 14, 2014Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.

13204N 4835/77

[*1] In re The Estate of Manny E. Duell, Deceased. 
Andrew Duell, Petitioner-Respondent-Appellant, 
vThea Duell, et al., Objectants-Appellants-Respondents.
Law Office of Laraine Pacheco, New York (Laraine Pacheco of counsel), and Kaye Scholer LLP, New York (Arlene Harris of counsel), for appellants-respondents.
Leclair Ryan, New York (Thomas E. Butler of counsel), and Ferrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale (John R. Morken of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
Decree, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Rita Mella, S.), entered on or about August 1, 2013, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding petitioner $3,749,186.07 (representing $4,071,096.46 in executor's commissions pursuant to Surrogate's Court Procedure Act [SCPA] § 2307[1], less $321,910.39 in surcharges, which represented some of objectants' legal fees) and ordering that petitioner be reimbursed from the estate for his legal fees and costs in the amount of $2,052,847.60, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to reduce the award by $3,787.50,
representing an additional surcharge, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.
We defer to the Surrogate's analysis of the benefits and detriments the executor provided to the estate in making an award of commissions.
We do, however, impose an additional surcharge of $3,787.50, representing the fees incurred by objectant Thea Duell and former (now deceased) objectant Irene Duell to expand the powers of the court-appointed fiduciary so that he could end the deadlock between the two executors appointed by the will. These legal fees benefitted the estate as a whole (see Matter of Wallace, 68 AD3d 680 [1st Dept 2009]).
The Surrogate's allowance of $2,052,847.60 of petitioner's legal fees was proper (see e.g. Wallace, 68 AD3d at 680).
The Surrogate properly declined to award petitioner an additional $4,721,855.30 in commissions under SCPA 2307(6). Petitioner's own testimony shows that he already received rental commissions: Nonparty Morgan Holding received 5% of the gross rents and paid out all but a nominal amount of profit to petitioner and his coexecutor. Morgan's expenses were properly deducted from the 5% (see Matter of Wendel, 159 Misc 900, 902 [Sur Ct, NY County 1935], affd 248 App Div 713 [1st Dept 1936], affd 273 NY 532 [1937]).
We have considered the parties' remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them [*2]unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 14, 2014
CLERK