Court Opinion

ID: 988447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:52:36.821494+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:33.400619
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7417

ROBERT EARL BROOKS,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-94-569-5-BR)

Submitted:   January 23, 1996             Decided:   February 9, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brooks v. Freeman, No. CA-94-569-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2