Court Opinion

ID: 1031264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:28:45.448001+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:52.055283
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Ricky Vincent Pendleton appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Pendleton’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis as unintelligible and for failure to raise any cognizable claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pendleton’s motion for transcripts at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Pendleton,
  
  No. 3:96-cr-00001-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.