Court Opinion

ID: 6036682
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 13:24:25.964416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:04.830071
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered November 3, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (six counts) and robbery in the second degree (23 counts).
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of six counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]) and 23 counts of robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [1]; [2] [a], [b]). We reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant, however, that, because restitution was not part of the plea agreement, County Court should have afforded him the opportunity to withdraw his plea before ordering him to pay restitution (see People v Ponder, 42 AD3d 880, 882 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 925 [2007]; People v Robinson, 21 AD3d 1356, 1357 [2005]). Although defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review, we exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see Ponder, 42 AD3d at 882). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and *1304we remit the matter to County Court to impose the promised sentence or to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea. Present — Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Peradotto, Carni and Whalen, JJ.