Court Opinion

ID: 5643521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 06:32:39.924901+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:17.322163
License: Public Domain

Pope, Judge,
concurring specially.
I write to express my complete disapproval of the idea that it is proper to use the method of impeachment allowed by OCGA § 24-9-84 in a situation in which the “community” in which the reputation of *143bad character is formed is that of a prison housing convicted felons. I do not dissent simply because a separate panel of this court has already reversed the conviction of the co-defendant of appellant (see Martinez v. State, 189 Ga. App. 69 (375 SE2d 123) (1988)), and the record shows that the trial judge considered appellant the less culpable of the two men.
Decided February 1, 1989.
Joel E. Williams, Jr., for appellant.
Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, David C. Walker, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Showing bad character by the method set out in OCGA § 24-9-84 necessarily presupposes a community which values the truth and naturally would note the deviation from the community standard in a member of the community who persisted in not telling the truth. A prison population composed of felons does not meet that standard. The law allows those convicted of felonies and other crimes involving moral turpitude to be impeached by proof of conviction. Perry v. State, 173 Ga. App. 541 (4) (327 SE2d 527) (1985). This is bas.ed upon a belief that people who commit such crimes have set themselves so far from the accepted behavior of society that they are unworthy of belief. Thus, it adds nothing to the search for truth to have one felon say of another “His reputation for veracity is bad.” The rules of evidence are formulated to find the truth in the crucible of trial. Each rule must be evaluated in that light. Rote application of OCGA § 24-9-84 in these circumstances adds nothing to that search.