Court Opinion

ID: 7271680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-25 07:29:09.549198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:18:46.957759
License: Public Domain

CCA 201000302. Review granted on the following issue:
DOES AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011)?
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.