Court Opinion

ID: 992957
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:00:37.372774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:53.000774
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-1780

EDWARD G. TINSLEY,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97-
1333-AMD)

Submitted:   August 28, 1997          Decided:   September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward G. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

suit filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346

(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. United States, No. CA-
97-1333-AMD (D. Md. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2