Court Opinion

ID: 4397845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-17 00:00:18.667625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:09.906051
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10806      Document: 00514960832         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/16/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-10806
                                                                               FILED
                                                                           May 16, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CY VIATOR,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:15-CR-44-24

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Cy Viator has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Viator
has filed responses.
       We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Viator’s responses. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10806   Document: 00514960832   Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/16/2019

                              No. 17-10806

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                    2