Court Opinion

ID: 9482472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 08:51:38.790568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:49:01.387700
License: Public Domain

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
March 26, 1992.
Before WISDOM, KING and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
*923PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. The three February B, 1992, opinions are revised as follows: