Court Opinion

ID: 8649985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 20:24:21.527946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:29.275730
License: Public Domain

MOLLISON, Judge
(concurring):
I concur with the disposition of this case because I believe the United States Court of Military Appeals in the cases of United States v. Partyka, 30 M.J. 242 (C.M.A. 1990), and United States v. Cleveland, 29 M.J. 361 (C.M.A.1990), has limited Government rebuttal of unsworn statements to statements of fact, vice opinions, therein. Rule for Courts-Martial 1001(c)(2)(C). The statements the Government sought to rebut here more properly fell in the latter category.