Court Opinion

ID: 9679348
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:49:52.848177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:02.111448
License: Public Domain

Grant, J.,
dissenting.
For the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Watson v. City of Omaha, 209 Neb. 835, 312 N.W.2d 256 (1981), and in the dissenting opinion in Garreans v. City of Omaha, 216 Neb. 487, 345 N.W.2d 309 (1984), I respectfully dissent.
I would reverse on the ground that a municipality is not an owner within the meaning of the Recreation Liability Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 37-1001 et seq. (Reissue 1984).
White and Shanahan, JJ., join in this dissent.