Court Opinion

ID: 9716211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 06:30:58.842171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:59:02.643503
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Spaulding, J.:
I respectfully dissent.
Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the Act of May 2,1929, P. L. 1237, §46, as amended, 23 P.S. §46, which allows for the payment of alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs to wives, but not to hus*461bands. I believe the statute to be unconstitutional for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Senderson v. Henderson, 224 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 303 A. 2d 843 (1973). I would therefore reverse the order of the court below.
Hoffman, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.