Court Opinion

ID: 8166050
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:59:22.651887+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:38.927490
License: Public Domain

The petition for rehearing is granted, limited to the question of infringement of Claims 18, 20,22 and 23 of the Jones et al. patent. The Court desires argument as to the applicability of *911the doctrine of equivalents to the findings of fact in this case.
John F. Oberlin, Ashley M. Van Duzer, Thomas V. Koykka, James R. Stewart and Charles L. Byron for petitioners.
John T. Cahill, James A. Fowler, Jr., Richard. R. Wolfe and Loftus E. Becker for respondent.