Court Opinion

ID: 4177058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-13 16:14:00.595573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:13.108157
License: Public Domain

People v Hines (2017 NY Slip Op 04785)

People v Hines

2017 NY Slip Op 04785

Decided on June 13, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 13, 2017

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Richter, Feinman, Webber, JJ.

1404/13 4239 4873/12 4238

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vTyson Hines, Defendant-Appellant.

Feldman and Feldman, Uniondale (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila O'Shea of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 19, 2003,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: JUNE 13, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.