Court Opinion

ID: 4703900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-15 18:00:37.744174+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:04:50.396250
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10575      Document: 00515938969         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/15/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                           July 15, 2021
                                  No. 20-10575                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Carlos Miguel Garza, Jr.,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:19-CR-30-1

   Before Costa, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Miguel
   Garza, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10575     Document: 00515938969          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/15/2021

                                   No. 20-10575

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2