Court Opinion

ID: 9686486
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:51:00.260597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:19.295672
License: Public Domain

SABERS, Justice
(concurring specially).
I concur in all respects except that I would remand to the trial court for the sole purpose of determining the circumstances under which Carr can return to the premises to remove the tank, pump, and related items, and restore the premises to original condition.
I would remand for that purpose even though this is a declaratory judgment action. A remand is justified because 1) as the trial court stated, “under equity principles the plaintiff is entitled to recover,” 2) the tank, pump, and related items are *605Carr’s property and have not been paid for, 3) the problem was caused principally by City representatives, and 4) only a remand prevents unjust enrichment to the City.