Court Opinion

ID: 988252
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:50:14.497172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:03.606509
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7592

ANTHONY O. JENNINGS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

L. MUNDEY, Doctor; MACK BONNER, Doctor; DOCTOR
MEILLER,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
95-2198-S)

Submitted:   January 11, 1996             Decided:   January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony O. Jennings, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Jennings v. Mundey, No. CA-95-2198-S (D. Md. Sept. 1, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2