Court Opinion

ID: 7785467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:21:11.017713+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:16.816616
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 13, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. See generally Canfield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002); Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. The Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Transcript, filed on September 20, 2006, is denied as moot.
ERVIN, BARFIELD and POLSTON, JJ., concur.