Court Opinion

ID: 542526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:53.723153
License: Public Domain

904 F.2d 699Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Ernest DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Carl DAVIS, Charge of Mailroom, Defendant-Appellee,andJames Rollins, Warden;  Carl Jackson, Charge of Mailroom, Defendants.
No. 90-6546.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 7, 1990.Decided:  May 25, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 88-1896-HM).
Ernest Davis, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General;  Roanld Mark Levitan, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Ernest Davis appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Davis v. Davis, CA-88-1896-HM (D.Md. Feb. 5, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED