Court Opinion

ID: 5463946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 19:46:14.43489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:01.473624
License: Public Domain

Curia.

This rule is general,, as to actions arising ex delictot We must change the venue., unless the plaintiff stipulate.
Paige. Will it not be a compliance with the rule, if we stipulate to give material evidence arising in the adjoining county of Saratoga ?
Curia. No. Ybu are confined to the county of Schenectady, where your venue is laid.
Time was given Mr. Paige, to advise whether he could stipulate with safety ;(a) and the matter was not mentioned again in Court, that I heard.

 If the plaintiff fail in doing that which he has undertaken, namely, ■to give material evidence at the trial, of some matter in issue arising in the county where the venue is laid, he will be non-suit. (2 W. Bl. 1031, and vid. 2 T. R. 281.) But it will be sufficient, if, for instance it be proved, that the deed upon which the action is founded was enrolled within the county, (Peake’s Ev. 213,) or in an action by the assignees of a bankrupt, to prove that the commission issued, and the bankruptcy was declared in the county. (2 M. & S. 36, but vid. 1 New Rep. 310,contra,) or, it seems, to prove that the cause of action arose abroad, (1 H. Bl. 280,) or, in an action in *197Middlesex, to prove a payment of money into Court, even though the money were paid in after the rule to retain the venue was obtained. (2 T. R. 275.) But the undertaking in this case must be understood to have reference only to the evidence necessary to support the declaration : and, therefore, if the defendant confess and avoid the whole cause of action, or plead a tender to the whole declaration, the plaintiff will not be bound to produce at the trial, the material evidence he undertook to give. (1 Taunt. 518, and vid. 3 Taunt. 86. Vid. 2 Archhold, 177.)