Court Opinion

ID: 1002316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:09:25.631916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:41.135660
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 00-6428

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Respondent - Appellee,

          versus

REGINALD BERNARD WHITMORE,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.   Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CR-97-367, CA-99-2214)

Submitted:   August 24, 2000                 Decided:   August 30, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Bernard Whitmore, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Reginald Bernard Whitmore seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration.    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and

find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Whitmore, Nos. CR-97-367; CA-

99-2214 (D.S.C. Nov. 3 & Dec. 8, 1999).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2