Court Opinion

ID: 6779107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:53:50.907538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:50.452651
License: Public Domain

ENTRY
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1994-1995 reporting period.
On April 14, 1997, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent, and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).
On January 4, 1999, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On January 4,1999, the commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during her suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Mary Patricia DeChant, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.