Court Opinion

ID: 3200516
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-04 20:10:08.009073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:18.394279
License: Public Domain

People v Ozorio (2016 NY Slip Op 03533)

People v Ozorio

2016 NY Slip Op 03533

Decided on May 4, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 4, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2012-10771
 (Ind. No. 6540/12)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vRanfy Ozorio, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed October 19, 2012, as amended November 15, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.	The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court