Court Opinion

ID: 9734144
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:26:23.037586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:45.945361
License: Public Domain

*407aThe following memorandum was filed February 7, 1956:
Steinle, J.
(on motion for rehearing). With respect to plaintiff-respondent’s motion for rehearing, we find ourselves obliged to adhere to the original determination that the existence of a support agreement under the circumstances as indicated by the record, and the equities of defendants-appellants, should it be determined that such agreement existed, are matters that must be decided at a trial.
Defendants-appellants in their brief upon the motion for rehearing point out that while in Delong v. Delong (1883), 56 Wis. 514, 14 N. W. 591 (cited by this court in its opinion herein), the author of that opinion alluded only to money payment, nevertheless, the records and briefs of the case indicate that the agreements contemplated personal service as well as money payment. We have decided to withdraw all statements and implications in the opinion that equity may grant relief by way of rescission where a support agreement, and conveyance made pursuant thereto, involves only the payment of money. We leave such consideration for future determination.
By the Court. — The motion for rehearing is denied with costs.