Court Opinion

ID: 61368
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 04:07:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:17.672209
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  The Appellant, Dwight Moss, presents five arguments on appeal: (1) that the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal; (2) that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in denying a
  
   Franks
  
  hearing; (3) that the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence that a bulletproof vest was found in his residence; (4) that the district court incorrectly determined the amount of loss in calculating the advisory guidelines; and (5) that his sentences are unreasonable.
 

  Having considered the briefs and relevant parts of the record, and having heard oral argument, we conclude that Appellant’s arguments lack merit. We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences.
 

  AFFIRMED.