Court Opinion

ID: 2682567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-10 21:00:42.994282+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:12.396782
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                           FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                              JUL 10 2014

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10512

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00833-CKJ-
                                                 HCE-1
  v.

ISAURO MORAN-GUILLERMO, a.k.a.                   MEMORANDUM*
Isauro Moran-Guilermo,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                    Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted April 22, 2014**

Before:        HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

       Isauro Moran-Guillermo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Moran-Guillermo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Moran-Guillermo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Moran-Guillermo has waived his right to appeal his reentry of a removed

alien conviction and 46-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable

issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      DISMISSED.

                                         2