Court Opinion

ID: 9549146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:14:04.514009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:19:55.250895
License: Public Domain

CALLISTER, Justice
(dissenting) :
I concur with the views set forth in the dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Hen-riod. However, I would like to make a further observation. In my opinion, plaintiffs’ argument with respect to the Commission’s jurisdiction to make an award against them in this proceeding is meritorious. This was a claim against Wasatch — not against plaintiffs. If the Commission was to exercise its continuing jurisdiction over the Mollerup injury, that case should have been reopened and the claimant required to prove some change or new development in the injury not known to the parties at the time the award was made.1

. Salt Lake City v. Industrial Commission, 61 Utah 514, 215 P. 1047 (1923).