Court Opinion

ID: 9945357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-27 19:01:26.554701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:27.509740
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-20561           Document: 30-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/27/2024

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                           Fifth Circuit
                                  ____________                                           FILED
                                                                                  February 27, 2024
                                   No. 23-20561
                                 Summary Calendar                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                 ____________                                            Clerk

Marcus Edward Adams,

                                                                 Plaintiff—Appellant,

                                         versus

Harris County Court System,

                                            Defendant—Appellee.
                  ______________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:23-CV-3370
                  ______________________________

Before Jolly, Engelhardt, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
      Marcus Edward Adams has filed a pro se appeal from the district
court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice.
However, he does not meaningfully address the district court’s stated
reasons for dismissing his complaint. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy
Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). In failing to do so, he has

      _____________________
      *
          This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-20561         Document: 30-1     Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/27/2024

                                 No. 23-20561

abandoned any challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his complaint.
See id.
          Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                      2