Court Opinion

ID: 9531225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:08:49.689064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:22.572149
License: Public Domain

TONGUE, J.,
pro tempore, specially concurring.
I concur in the result of the decision by the majority, but solely on the basis of its holding that the map attached to the comprehensive plan was inconsistent with the text of the comprehensive plan; that the text of the plan is controlling; and that it was therefore proper to amend the plan map to deepen the commercial zone, as contemplated by the plan text, in order to eliminate that inconsistency. I also agree with the holding by the majority that under the circumstances of this case that decision by the city council was not invalidated by the so-called “ex parte contacts.”