Court Opinion

ID: 2965303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:38:26.608346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:15.442914
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                                
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit
                                
                                

No. 97-2430

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                           PAUL DEVITO,

                      Defendant, Appellant.

           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

        [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
                                
                                

                             Before
                                
                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                

     Dana A. Curhan on brief for appellant.
     Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Alexandra Leake,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

May 18, 1998

                                
                                
  Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and
record, it plainly appears that we do not have jurisdiction to
consider the extent of the downward departure allowed by the
district court, notwithstanding defendant's allegation of disparate
treatment.  See United States v. McAndrews, 12 F.3d 273, 276 (1st
Cir. 1993); United States v. Ruiz, 905 F.2d 499, 508-09 (1st Cir.
1990).  
  Defendant raises no other cognizable challenge to his
conviction or sentence, and therefore, we affirm the judgment.  See1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.