Court Opinion

ID: 8480624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:43:10.931788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.097108
License: Public Domain

*118Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
E. George Minns appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minns v. Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00283-JRS-FBS, 2010 WL 1375266 (E.D. Va. April 1, 2010); (May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.