Court Opinion

ID: 30438
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:54:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:43.192820
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-41117
                        Conference Calendar

ROBERT GONZALEZ, JR.,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THOMAS PRASIFKA, Warden; WILLIAM G.,

                                         Defendants-Appellees.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. C-02-CV-172
                       --------------------
                         February 19, 2003
Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Robert Gonzalez, Jr., Texas state prisoner # 761485, appeals

the district court’s dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of

his pro se, in forma pauperis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

barred by the statute of limitations.   This litigation is

governed by the Texas personal injury limitations period, which

is two years, and federal law determines when the cause of action

accrues.   Gartrell v. Gaylor, 981 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 02-41117
                                -2-

Gonzalez’s cause of action accrued, at the latest, on August 5,

1999, the date of the attack.   See Piotrowski v. City of Houston,

51 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 1995) (cause of action accrues when

plaintiff becomes aware that he has suffered an injury or has

sufficient information to know that he has been injured).

Additionally, Gonzalez’s tolling argument is rejected because

Texas law no longer provides for tolling because of imprisonment.

See Gartrell, 981 F.2d at 257; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.

§ 16.001 (Vernon 2002).   Since Gonzalez did not file his

complaint within two years of August 5, 1999, the district court

did not commit error when it dismissed Gonzalez’s complaint as

barred by the statute of limitations.     See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

     The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.