Court Opinion

ID: 9617623
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 04:59:00.352334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:13.714956
License: Public Domain

DOOLING, J.
I concur.The opinion disposes fairly of all questions raised in appellants’ opening brief. In a brief in letter form filed by appellant by leave of court in lieu of oral argument additional points are presented for the first time. Appellant should present all points upon which he relies for reversal in his opening brief and we are fully justified in refusing to consider the other arguments so tardily made. (Monk v. Ehret, 192 Cal. 186, 190 [219 P. 452] ; Grayson v. Grayson, 132 Cal.App.2d 471, 472 [282 P.2d 565] ; 4 Cal.Jur.2d 324.)
A petition for a rehearing was denied April 23, 1959, and appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 20, 1959.