Court Opinion

ID: 4160630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-04-17 07:17:16.54062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:23:33.987508
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-86,584-01

                       EX PARTE ANGELITA FERNANDEZ, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 7560A IN THE 32ND DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM MITCHELL COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possessing a

prohibited item in a correctional facility and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant contends that she was denied her right to a direct appeal through no fault of her

own. See Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Appellate counsel explains that

when he was appointed, Applicant was already released to an appellate bond, so it was assumed that

the notice of appeal had already been filed to vest jurisdiction in the appellate court. A notice of
                                                                                                     2

appeal, however, had not been timely filed, so Applicant’s direct appeal was later dismissed.

Fernandez v. State, No. 11-16-00351-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland Jan. 6, 2017) (not designated for

publication).

       Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause No. 7560 from the 32nd District Court of Mitchell County. Applicant is ordered

returned to that time at which she may give a written notice of appeal so that she may then, with the

aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial

court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date

on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an

appeal, she must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30

days after the mandate of this Court issues.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 12, 2017
Do not publish