Court Opinion

ID: 8123617
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:03:15.809052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:07.431153
License: Public Domain

Welkee, J.
There are 13 exceptions filed by the respondent, owner of the Tuthill, covering all the findings of the commissioner. After full argument on behalf of both parties the exceptions are overruled and the report confirmed, except as to the item of repairs made to the libelants’ vessel as allowed by the commissioner, to-wit, $700, found by him to have been the reasonable value of the repairs; and as to that item the court reduce the amount to the sum of $553.27, the actual expense of the repairs as found by the commissioner. The court holds that, although the rule adopted by the commissioner constitutes the usual measure of damages, yet when it appears that the repairs were actually done for less, and no claim made for more compensation by the shipwrights who did the work, in equity such should be the measure of recovery.
Decree accordingly.