Court Opinion

ID: 2870879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 03:53:09.872985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:40.880312
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-06-00239-CV

                                    Lori Carpenter, Appellant

                                                  v.

                Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
           NO. 211,683-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               On August 30, 2006, this Court notified counsel for Lori Carpenter that the brief in

this case was overdue. To date, we have received no response. Because this is a termination case

with appointed counsel, we will abate the appeal and remand for a status hearing. See In re T.V.,

8 S.W.3d 448, 450 (Tex. App.—Waco 1990, no pet.) (remanding for status hearing); see also

Latham v. Department of Family & Protective Servs., 177 S.W.3d 341, 346 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (looking to court of criminal appeals for guidance in dealing with indigent

representation in termination cases); Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (setting procedure for handling

appointed counsel’s failure to file brief in criminal cases).

               The record in this case reflects a finding that Carpenter is indigent and shows the

appointment of counsel to represent Carpenter at trial. Although there is no separate appointment

in the record for the appeal, the appellate documents were all signed by trial counsel, and we have
not been notified of any other counsel of record. See Latham, 177 S.W.3d at 346 (no evidence that

counsel ever withdrew after trial). Due to the nature of a termination proceeding and the right of an

indigent parent to have appointed counsel, we abate this case and remand to the trial court with

instructions to hold a hearing to determine whether Carpenter desires to proceed with the appeal and

why no brief has been filed. See T.V., 8 S.W.3d at 450.

               If Carpenter no longer wishes to pursue this appeal, she must file a motion asking to

dismiss her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Having found Carpenter indigent, the trial court

should take such measures as necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may

include the appointment of new counsel. Latham, 177 S.W.3d at 346-47 (if trial counsel no longer

represents indigent person who is entitled to representation, then upon request, the trial court should

conduct an inquiry and promptly appoint appellate counsel). If Carpenter wishes to waive her right

to counsel, a knowing and intelligent waiver of such right must appear on the record. Any other

matters affecting the status of this appeal should be made a part of the record.1

               The trial court should forward a complete record of the hearing within sixty days of

the date of this opinion. If Carpenter has not abandoned her appeal or waived her right to counsel,

the court should direct Carpenter’s counsel to file a brief within such time as the trial court deems

appropriate for the circumstances, but not later than thirty days from the date of the hearing. We

abate the appeal for ninety days from the date of this opinion.

  1
    For example, if counsel is having difficulty contacting her client, the record should reflect that
problem.

                                                  2
                                           W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Filed: October 19, 2006

                                              3