Court Opinion

ID: 475363
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:46:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:52.797445
License: Public Domain

799 F.2d 751Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.In Re:  Joseph Marion Head, Jr.
No. 86-7123.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 30, 1986.Decided Sept. 3, 1986.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

1
(Joseph Marion Head, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.)

PER CURIAM:

2
North Carolina inmate Joseph Marion Head, Jr., filed a series of papers in the federal district court seeking habeas corpus relief.  Although the district court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, it noted that the complaint was conclusory, repetitive of another lawsuit and furnished no basis for relief.  The court concluded that the action was "frivolous," as defined in 28 U.S.C. Sec.  1915(d), and dismissed.

3
Commencement of a civil suit without prepayment of costs may be allowed by a district court if a litigant makes affidavit that he is unable to pay the costs or give security therefor.  28 U.S.C. Sec.  1915(a).  After filing in forma pauperis is allowed, however, the court may dismiss the case "if satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious."    28 U.S.C. Sec.  1915(d).  In other words, the district court should order the case docketed based on an inmate's economic status, then determine whether it should be dismissed under Sec.  1915(d).  Boyce v. Alizaduh, 595 F.2d 948 (4th Cir. 1979).  The authority of the district court to dismiss under section (d) is especially broad in civil rights cases brought by prisoners.   Id. at 951.

4
In the instant case, dismissal was proper under Sec.  1915(d) on the grounds that the action was frivolous.  Finding, as we do, that the district court acted within its discretion, we affirm the judgment of dismissal.  We dispense with oral argument as the record and other materials before the Court indicate it would not significantly aid the decisional process.  In re:  Joseph Marion Head, Jr., C/A No. 86-0117 (W.D.N.C., April 14, 1986).

5
AFFIRMED.