Court Opinion

ID: 4236259
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-12 08:27:15.368633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:06.803170
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                           ____________________
                              NO. 09-17-00289-CR
                           ____________________

              ALEX YOVANY BONILLA-FUENTES, Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________            ______________

                On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
                        Montgomery County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. 17-320435
________________________________________________________             _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On December 1, 2017, we notified the parties that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the

record or the appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See

Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the

appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P.

20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                         1
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                              ________________________________
                                                     LEANNE JOHNSON
                                                           Justice

Submitted on January 9, 2018
Opinion Delivered January 10, 2018
Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.

                                          2