Court Opinion

ID: 3529457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:41:54.952333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:20:28.858250
License: Public Domain

The record in this case shows that this suit was begun in the justice court on an account filed there by the plaintiff. The constable served the defendant and his return merely showed that service was had on the defendant in Spring Creek Township, Douglas County, Missouri. The suit was begun and tried in Benton Township, Douglas County, Missouri. The defendant entered his appearance in the justice court and a judgment was rendered against him for $15.45. From this judgment the defendant appealed the case to the circuit court, and when it reached there he filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because there was nothing in the transcript of the justice showing the residence of the parties. In fact nothing appears from the record of the justice of the peace, certified up to the circuit court, that the justice before whom the judgment was rendered had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant other than the fact that defendant entered his appearance and went to trial. The circuit court sustained the motion to dismiss the appeal and it is from the judgment of dismissal the appeal is taken.
The court erred in sustaining the motion, because when the defendant entered his appearance in the justice court and appealed the case from the justice court to the circuit court, he has subjected his person to the jurisdiction of the two courts in which the cause was pending. It has been recently held in the case of Lesan Advertising Co. v. Castleman, 265 Mo. 345, l.c. 351, 177 S.W. 597, that, "The jurisdiction of the person of appellant was complete by his appearance in the justice's court at the trial; by taking the appeal, and thereby going voluntarily into the circuit court." Besides, the question of the jurisdiction of the person might have been shown *Page 148 aliunde the transcript of the justice. [See Trimble v. Elkin,88 Mo. App. 229; Barnes v. Plessner, 162 Mo. App. 460,142 S.W. 747; Swezea v. Jenkins, 186 Mo. App. 428, l.c. 432, 433,171 S.W. 618.]
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Cox, P.J., and Bradley, J., concur.