Court Opinion

ID: 9831167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:52:16.31452+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:32.017261
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Since the rendition of the opinion the appellant seeks by certiorari to include in the transcript exceptions filed in the trial court to the auditor’s report. It is the general rule that corrections of the transcript cannot be made under the rules after decision of the case on appeal. Mansfield v. Investment Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 263 S. W. 658; Woolley v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 481. But, treating the exceptions as a part of the record, as we now do, such exceptions so made can serve the purpose only of constituting the items objected to in the issues to be tried in the matter of general accounting. For the reasons stated in the original opinion, the trial court was authorized to conclude that appellant, not now an absolute taker of the property under the will, was not presently entitled to have compulsory general accounting by the trustees. The record affords no ground for the appellate court to overturn that conclusion.