Court Opinion

ID: 4055930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 07:26:48.413204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:01:56.304989
License: Public Domain

/l/V,     /0_?£*/S
                     f^JO  '«•*        RECEIVED
                                  COURTOF        IN
                                          cmniHM.APPEAL

-^             xv the
                                    Abe!Acosia,Cte*
     COURT OF       CfUHnXUAL APPEALS
PETTTXOM FDR DXSCRETXDJVARY flEVXEW

                   OF THE
court of appeals fxfth d i s t r i c t o f
         texas       Pit Dallas
      AID. 05-I5-OOG&5-C.R

 &f\RV eu&ene Ex:ms~. Appbllmnt
                 V.
 TriE STATE £>F TEXAS •, APPELLEE

 DA/ APPEAL FR0m.THE.aQ3i nd VUQXCXPiL
 DISTRICT COURT DALLAS CDUA/Tl TEXfiS
 TRIAL C£>6tfT CAUSE y\^F-0^W5^5<9j=j,£D|N
                                    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                                          AUG 13 23;5

                                        Abel Acosta, Clerk
        TABLE OF CONTENTS*

TABLE OF CONTENTS
X/VDEX OF AUTHORT.TTE£>
STATEmFA/T OF THE C/4SE <e * , <> „                   /
N&TUHE OF 1HB CASE.             *    „   .    \      ,

         ERRORS of court of APP&als
Error(i), The. c&arF of appeals was in abuse.
         oP Oisc*rek\ov\ hy Df5ryifrr& appeal -For
         wan 4 of tfurtsciiGtioyi.                    w3-Y-5
Error &)/The courh ofi appv®te> waz> m ctbustL &p
        of sere Hon, gy rulfa e ihcu-f APf&uj \m*$ untf/nely*, £>
      TKTKL COURT EKftDRS
Error fix Tn'&L courF abuse 1+Discretion in not
Holding £Vfdenifary Heahh-Bi       . ^7
Error texsta-fc. Procedural RUte is Vh!^^ B
Err©r &)* Oehic/I of fflrofarmehF &F ^oun^^i',— *!
Error til* The Ft-fFh ^m^yidm^eM RtehFrr*be Heard-l&
ErrtrC5\ The SixFk ftm^n&m^+Ri<zhFc&rtfr~-.~io
 Error(Q, Er\iiFlem-e,HT To Otscv&rYL                     jo
6REHEAKX/V£ EN&AjVCWHS DENIED OA'.'J'une^MS?
CASES x JAfQEX OF AUTHORTTJrEZ                    ,    PA&E
 Thomas V.Skz-he aas.' sw*>d ^ihir^crim^pf^m}-^
 EYPar^vittanueva^SasSwtes^i^                                     3
EY Par+eMar&eM &l*j swhd2&LCr^cri^JPP. mi)                    4
ExPcfr^sR^r\\er\1V\ Sw^3H^(Te&trfm./W*tfef)- _ H
EXp'Qrt&i crozJ&y *£wfi 5w&dJ$z?l(r&t cfm.APf.wrtL _5
/^ayes V.S^k 53-gSvi/a*/ &27(T&,crim,/fr>fJ^7&            £
Tbi/WServd V, Sa1 Y\ x373 U* 5,£?<93 (T/^63)_ _ _. .£
JJcWu^fl/5S.Cffi5l)                  __   _       _ _7
Hc»i\y. ®U<&irFecMfMiS-SH^F3*zl 36>5tSW tcfr.2€?pB-- 7

Bl>ocK>77^/7 i/. .scott aa,Fic/ shocuk cfirJwVL-Sl
T(QiunSe,nd K S*tn\ 37a <y.3, 3*?3C/*te»- _7
wfllfanis K Tavlor\ 52*1 o>3*3&A<:ao£?o)_ - 6
 V<aldv?~ V*Co<c:krt,iL&>Lf F?^W/(shk'Ctr.a&>lL jB
 Town^end V.s*uf/l^?>^a(/*5t£73^Q*::t65^        "6

Trevfn o v» Sk?h SLS SW9*d ^^^Cl^CftmJ^ff^._ ?
 ^trk/^/^ v- w**z,Hirt<a±on Mk>(=> u,^>*LL&Q^&l -3
 ftfchorel&osi l/> wrfekFiHos USsae&CwrSii-- Jo
 ^odb^r® V.Kelly^,^7 xj.S <35^<T/*7 7£)__ /a
 Q^\//S V. j4l<*&k<C4 HisU.*Z>,3QgCJ*l7N2 Jo
 W^rd V>wkl4i^^UFl^teSS^l&&tf
           STATUTES J4A/J0        <ZWSTXTUTTD//S
 TEX.COAfST, art,V\ 3€jcfioyj%&                       __ <-/^>5
  Ar-K HH»B2 _     _        '_        _       _       _   5
  U> S, Coajst* Amend. fcv/^5                 —               7

                            J 9
la.S, CQA/ST.Am-end* 6 _               -___'_    _        9
U. 5. C ^ S L ^ e i r i 5j£6l.          _        _       J£>
Art-* Ivs^oi-. /o_          _     _•        _            <y
   RULES
TEX. R. APP. P. 44.W >(<«<&£-).             ._       _   J-3-5

                      //i
 TO THE MONOBRBL COURT OF CRIMINAL
 APPEALS OF TEXMS I
Now comes The Defendant (MRYEUGEAfE SX/VIZ.
in Thte Petition For Dbcr&tfonarv Revtew of
 Tke 'Judstrt-ent cf the. Ft-Pth court of MPPejcils
 Dallas coujifyi lMa£> i which on '3unedciAO)5.
 Dismissed Appeal Par wa/ih of Jurisdiction .

 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
 A Jury convicted defendant of ae^ravaied
 sexual assault and assessed jPu/Ushjnent ar
 CvnPfnerneMt for life.(fiRll 10Z-/03) *

      /VATUflE OF WE CASE
The dendoint 5o objection unde,r Texc*s Hale of
appellate- FrocedirexHH.m (QXfk^i;That state's
Remediable. Error c£ the trialc&urtfa") Qenercrily
h court of appeals Mush not otM-icmed or
 reversed fod^rn&nt or dismiss omappe.al
*I-Pn;jr> The trial court's erroneous acHo/7 or
pe-Pusa) 1d £*cr- Prevents the. PtoRerprescniaifon
of a cas^c to the. ceourt oP appealsiaW
Gft me ^r/-»/ cjaurF cam correct-its action oR-fallure
to act <cb)\ court of appeals directfmtf error
rernedicibleJt the. cfrcumstances described
In ra\ exfst^the court- of- appeals rnustdfre.ct-
tke trial court: to Correct the error.
             AHQUME//T
The court of appeals will th^n ProcceW as /V
the erroneous c*drion of P&?)ure. to a&+ h&d
 not occurrecf/'sese. Thoma&v.skv-fe £2.3 su/5d
 5/3 (Tex, Cr\m. IApp. Zkoo-iY^iJnHw Fhfs, Rule\W a
trial courtk e^rror Prevents the Proper
 Presesnt>atfon of the case te> the aPP&liats
court and tWat error c<cmi he. nem-ed/ec/
without re^urrfrvs cm enrfre neto trio!,
Ih^M the appellate Court /yiu^t clfrecF
the. tri<z*L *c<our-h to remedy the error s.o
that the, C4PP€sil'04j-e court w/JI khe //? a
position to evaluate thy*. &p#2.^//sy\o/perh/*
We hrzAve ctptfied tkf£> rule, ho o trfej c&uHk
r-e-ftj sal fc? Permit a de4h^cicfnt /© /n&Jte -on
oU^r oP- Proof* a trial c&ur+s faVure. -to
conduct a Proper B^t^o^? he^r/ti^E?, z?/%^
-a tribal c&urtzi Pa//are h> tw&ki* fi/nd/k^^
£<*c+ tfoz&l- ft \aso^> n&GUjV^ hYlctfic/ fz>snake
ftule yy,Vv bv <€ia/f-/r&st, fs de<^fen&c/ to
ePP^of the cresoth'ow oP & n&uu record)\vhen
O tribal court has-erroneously withheld

<l-ef-<w\<davth-s <s/<w*tf (dyj cwe^/fc.S.
tenure to -Pile ne^ufr^d ffattott of-P&ot)
or Kd5 r*neAseri+ed U*, dWWa«/ from

                  »
Submitting in-Porm^rhfori necessary te>
evaluate his claim Ce. s, fiePus\v\<=/ to Permit^
Ov) afifier ©P Proof) \ the eipp-eil^liz jcx>urt is
CdirecteAJto step fn and order the triad
Court ta correct the situctttow'.The ker/
to RuJe-^rWvfs that there rwu^t be <ari
error that the appe^ll-ate coutrt cram, s o
correct, find Afi the error in GuestTen i3
suhj&at to the usu^il rulers of Procedural
default-, theyj At /nw&t have k&&r7Pfleserred
by objection*
              EmoRS OF COURT OF APPEALS
(l\ The Court of appeal5 was Ma abuse ofi
   Discretion by dismin^ the appeal-for want
   of 'Jurisdiction *
The Court oP <uPPe<al^> ol)6/se itk discration
in so dismiss s<&/&/ a/^e©/^rws^y- (oFVurisdietbn,
Dependant appeals \as<uz. Pursuant to, Jexp^, Pules,
ol APPeA\<z\e Procedure, , flu/e>33 J(cQa7 \ And HH*HfyYf)&)<
tfurisdictton \ see^Xparted]laviueva^ttiSwzd^I
("m.Cr(m<&VP. dsOQB-)^Applicantsou-Bht writoPJiaheas>
Corpus, Tbe^Sth Wstrict counFvHidalso counH
sumariN denied the. sate application >6S befns
fp ivo has. AppI lea nt <xppea\-ed. The corPa schristi
EAimhurs court cfi aPveats ^dismfesed th^e