Court Opinion

ID: 43782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:00:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:04.979507
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   July 13, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                            No. 05-20665                          Clerk
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose
Armando Sanchez-Pineda, also known as Mario Soto
Perez, also known as Eliazar Soto-Velasquez, also
known as Elizar Soto-Velasquez, also known as Alejandro
Hernandez-Torres, also known as Edgar Vasquez-Flores,
also known as Alejandro Vasquez-Torres,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:04-CR-477-ALL
                        --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Hernandez-

Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-

Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense.   The Government’s motion for summary

 affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

     *

  Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.