Court Opinion

ID: 4694511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-11 00:00:46.520173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:29.895943
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-40013     Document: 00515895645         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/10/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                       June 10, 2021
                                  No. 21-40013
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                         Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Emmanuel Jimenez-Lopez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 7:20-CR-1230-1

   Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emmanuel
   Jimenez-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez-Lopez has not filed a

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-40013     Document: 00515895645         Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/10/2021

                                  No. 21-40013

   response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2