Court Opinion

ID: 665122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:29:24+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:13.256984
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 13
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Michael Reynolds ROIG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6896.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 21, 1993.Decided March 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury.  Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge.  (CR-90-106-S).
Michael Reynolds Roig, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Roig, No. CR-90-106-S (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED