Court Opinion

ID: 993868
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:14:11.77125+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:19:59.808585
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 97-6989

KENNETH E. WILLIAMS,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; COLIE RUSHTON; DONALD
MCTAGGART; LEROY CARTLEDGE; D. BURNS,

                                          Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-96-842-0-23)

Submitted:   December 11, 1997        Decided:     December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Moore, No. CA-
96-842-0-23 (D.S.C. June 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2