Court Opinion

ID: 1010133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:06:51.346404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:12.061522
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  James F. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights action after he faded to comply with an order of the magistrate judge, requiring service of defendants in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(i) and answer special interrogatories by the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
  
   See Johnson v. Ashcroft,
  
  No. CA-02-2881-0 (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.