Court Opinion

ID: 9532080
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:17:55.225315+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:40.386529
License: Public Domain

SHINN, P. J.
I concur. I think plaintiff’s proof showed that she had no title to the property described in the lease. Anything paid to her as royalty on property she did not own would result in detriment to defendant in the same amount. Plaintiff having shown herself to be guilty of breach of warranty of title (since she owned no right, title or interest whatsoever), and the detriment appearing with certainty, it would be futile to allow the litigation to proceed further. In no aspect of the case can it be said that the judgment results in a miscarriage of justice.
A petition for a rehearing was denied June 12, 1951, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 19,1951.