Court Opinion

ID: 989546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:08:13.716654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:49.509854
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-8575

TIMOTHY S. LAING,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LYNN ARMENTROUT, Sheriff; RONALD BRINKLEY,
Lieutenant; R. JENKINS; T. CAMPBELL,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-95-527-R)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                    Decided:   June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy S. Laing, Appellant Pro Se.       Mark Dudley Obenshain,
WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Laing v. Armentrout, No. CA-95-527-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 12,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2