Court Opinion

ID: 988083
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:47:47.111892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:15.106292
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7317

DUKE E. WOODLEY,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-95-177-3)

Submitted:   November 21, 1995            Decided:   January 4, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duke E. Woodley, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Woodley v. Angelone, No. CA-95-177-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2