Court Opinion

ID: 2839614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-02 23:42:50.616687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:57:16.755192
License: Public Domain

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-06-00130-CR
____________

CLINT DEVONE SEATON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1042467

 
MEMORANDUM  OPINIONAppellant pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery  and, in accordance with
his plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to
confinement for five years.  Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal. 
               In a plea-bargained case in which the punishment assessed does not exceed
the plea agreement, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by
written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after obtaining the trial court’s
permission to appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645,
648-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Tex. Crim. App.
2001).
               The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal in this case states
that this is a plea-bargained case and appellant has no right to appeal.  The record
supports the correctness of the certification.  Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15
(Tex.  Crim. App. 2005).  We must dismiss an appeal if the trial court’s certification
shows there is no right to appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
               We note that appellant also waived his right to appeal.  See Buck v. State,
45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).
               Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
 All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings and Alcala.
Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).