Court Opinion

ID: 6427017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:04:47.919714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:52:02.143286
License: Public Domain

Barker, J.
The petition was rightly dismissed. The crossing as it now exists is not in fact a grade crossing, and the circumstances that it was once such a crossing, and that the grades of the street and the railroad have been separated under proceedings in accordance with the provisions of Pub. Sts. c. 112, §§ 129 et seq., begun before the passage of the present act to promote the abolition of grade crossings, St. 1890, c. 428, do not make the crossing one with which the Superior Court can deal upon a petition under St. 1890, c. 428, § 1. a
The intention of the Legislature to confine proceedings under that section to cases in which the abolition of an actual grade crossing is sought is shown by the language of the section, which relates to such crossings only, and by the fact that the old provisions for the alteration of crossings are left unrepealed. See Pub. Sts. c. 112, §§ 129 et seq.
If, owing to the nature and amount of travel upon the street and the nature of the crossing as it now exists, public convenience and necessity require an alteration of the crossing, the language of Pub. Sts. c. 112, § 129, meets the case, and gives the county commissioners power, under a proper petition, to adjudicate upon the necessity, and to decide the manner and limits within which the alteration shall be made. See Boston Albany Railroad v. County Commissioners, 164 Mass. 551; New Haven & Northampton Co. v. County Commissioners, 173 Mass. 12.
Decree dismissing petition with costs affirmed.