Court Opinion

ID: 8798569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 14:21:42.512614+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:03:46.351544
License: Public Domain

DOOLING, District Judge.
Petitioner is a Chinese laborer, who has been in this country for many years. He was registered in New York on March 2, 1894, and at that time received a Chinese laborer’s certificate of residence, which he had in his possession at the time of -the hearing which led to the order of deportation that he is contesting in this proceeding. ■ He has had no hearing before a commissioner or court.
[1] The proceedings leading to the order for his deportation were had before an immigration inspector, on the theory that some time in December, 1914, and January, 1915, he was in Juarez, Mexico, and that therefore he must have entered this country within three years. To establish that fact the statement of one Acosta is relied upon. Acosta, who is a police officer in Juarez, Mexico, in an ex parte statement before an inspector in El Paso, declared that he recognized a photograph shown him as that of a Chinese whom he had seen in Juarez in the latter part of December, 1914, and the early part of January, 1915. The photograph shown him is a photograph of petitioner. Unless petitioner has entered the United States within three years of the date of the hearing, he may not be deported, except after a hearing before a commissioner, with the right of appeal to the court.
[2] I have had occasion to hold before this that the fact which gives jurisdiction to the immigration officers to hear and determine *657these matters — that is, entry into the United States within three years - — cannot be established by ex parte statements of witnesses in Mexico, who base their statements upon photographs, and are never confronted by the alien sought to> be deported. In the absence of fair proof of such entry within three years, the only tribunals that can order the deportation of a Chinese laborer are the commissioners and the courts. I think the right of a laborer who has been long in this country to remain here is too important a right to be taken from him upon the ex parte statement of a resident of a foreign country who is never produced before him.
The demurrer to the petition will be overruled, and the writ will issue, returnable December 18, 1915, at 10 o’clock a. m.