Court Opinion

ID: 9926976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-25 22:06:16.500104+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:54.646064
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

           COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JOHNNY    COVINGTON                                                            NO.          2023 CW     1325

VERSUS

CLARK      SAND         CO.,        INC.;          CLEMCO
INDUSTRIES        CORPORATION            F/K/A CLEMCO
SERVICES               CORP.;               DEPENDABLE
AB RAS IVES,        INC. ;          E. D.      BULLARD
COMPANY;        EMPIRE       ABRASIVE        EQUIPMENT
COMPANY,     L. P. ;     LEHIGH          HANSON,     INC.
 A    SUBSIDIARY        OF    HEIDELBERG           CEMENT
GROUP)      F/K/A        HANSON           AGGREGATES,
INC.       F/K/A         HANSON             AGGREGATES
CENTRAL,        INC.     F /K/A      PIONEER        SOUTH
CENTRAL,          INC.            F/K/A        PIONEER
CONCRETE     OF    TEXAS,         INC.;     INGERSOLL-
RAND     CORPORATION;             LEROI     COMPRESSOR
A/K/A             ROTARY                  COMPRESSION
TECHNOLOGIES;          3M     COMPANY;        RUEMELIN
MANUFACTURING          CO.,        INC.;     SAN STORM,
INC.;     BOB      SCHMIDT          MANUFACTURING,
INC.;    SOUTHERN        SILICA OF          LOUISIANA,
INC.;      SPECIALTY               SAND       COMPANY;
SULLAIR    COMPRESSOR             CORPORATION;        AND                    JANUARY          18,     2024
TXI    OPERATIONS,       L.P.

In Re:          Empire       Abrasive        Equipment          Company,          L.P.,      applying      for
                supervisory              writs,      19th        Judicial              District         Court,
                Parish of East Baton Rouge,                      No.       649436.

BEFORE:         GUIDRY,C.J,          CHUTZ AND       LANIER,          JJ.

         WRIT      NOT       CONSIDERED.            The        writ        application          failed         to
include     a     copy       of    the     judgment       complained          of       in    violation         of
Rule     4-S(C) ( 6)         of    the      Uniform       Rules        of    Louisiana          Courts         of
Appeal.     Re lator         did    not     include        a    judgment          on    the    motion      for
summary     judgment          at    issue     filed       by    it;         instead,         the    included
judgment        only    references           the    motion       for       summary          judgment     filed
by     Clemco     Industries             Corporation.               There     is       no    reference         to
relator's       motion        for    summary        judgment          in    the    judgment        or    court
minutes.

        Supplementation               of      this        writ         application             and/ or         an
application        for       rehearing       will    not       be     considered.            Uniform     Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,                      Rules 2-18.7             and 4-9.

                                                          JMG
                                                          WRC
                                                          WIL

COURT    OF APPEAL,          FIRST CIRCUIT

       DEPUTY     CLERK OF COURT
           FOR THE        COURT