Court Opinion

ID: 8335720
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 22:25:59.041942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:31.447745
License: Public Domain

Fitzsimons, J.
The testimony admitted establishes a sale, delivery and use-by defendant of the terra cotta mentioned in the order of defendant, dated 19th of July, 1889, by plaintiff to defendant.
It does not vary from the allegation of the complaint, and sustains the same; sufficient facts were presented by said testimony to warrant its submission to' the jury for consideration.
It was, therefore, error for the trial justice to dismiss the complaint.
Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event of action.
Ehrlich, Oh. J.. concurs.