Court Opinion

ID: 8448041
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:43:31.42818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.842313
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston appeals the district court’s order granting in part Hairston’s *23518 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.