Court Opinion

ID: 8673738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:02:01.511072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.998642
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Pablo Romero appeals from the 98-month sentence imposed following a second remand for resentencing.
*604Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Romero’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*604ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.