Court Opinion

ID: 9381230
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-22 15:03:41.498581+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:31.315298
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                        Opinion filed March 22, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D22-1083
                      Lower Tribunal No. 22-3320 CC
                           ________________

                           Yolanda Ramirez,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

              Milton Raul Lopez and Jennifer Coba,
                                 Appellees.

    An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Gloria
Gonzalez-Meyer, Judge.

     Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., and Jeffrey M. Hearne, and
Kathryn Mesa, for appellant.

     Milton Raul Lopez and Jennifer Coba, in proper persons.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Upon review of the record before us, we reverse the final judgment of

eviction in this landlord-tenant dispute because the trial court should have

set Tenant’s motion to determine rent for an evidentiary hearing to resolve

the disputed issue of how much rent Tenant should have deposited into the

court registry. See Jappa v. Master Lessee Mezzo, LLC, 346 So. 3d 222,

224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (holding that the trial court erred by entering a default

final judgment without holding a hearing to resolve a dispute over the amount

of accrued rent the tenant had to pay into the court registry); Axen v. Poah

Cutler Manor, LLC, 323 So. 3d 800, 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (holding that

the trial court erred by entering final judgment without addressing the

tenant’s pending motion to determine rent); Prince v. MCR Apts. 1, LLC, 326

So. 3d 228, 228(Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“[W]e conclude the tenant’s motion for

determination of rent, pending and unresolved in the trial court, precluded

entry of the judgment.” (citing Axen, 323 So. 3d at 801)).

      Reversed and remanded.

                                       2