Court Opinion

ID: 4059148
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 14:13:59.08474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:56.271347
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                           ____________________
                              NO. 09-16-00261-CV
                           ____________________

   $4,300.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY (DAVID EARL STANLEY), Appellant

                                         V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________            ______________

                    On Appeal from the 258th District Court
                             Polk County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. CIV27,223
________________________________________________________            _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      The appellant, David Earl Stanley, filed a suggestion of mootness because

the trial court signed an order of non-suit for the civil forfeiture proceeding. The

State did not contest the suggestion of mootness. The appeal is dismissed as moot

without reference to the merits. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                              ________________________________
                                                      LEANNE JOHNSON
                                                            Justice

                                         1
Submitted on September 28, 2016
Opinion Delivered September 29, 2016

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.

                                          2