Court Opinion

ID: 2987268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 00:47:32.736053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:04.297050
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2013.

                                     In The

                     Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-12-00398-CR

                     DEWAYNE SLAUGHTER, Appellant

                                        V.
                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                    On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
                            Harris County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. 1273116

                 MEMORANDUM                     OPINION

      Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to murder. A jury found him guilty
and the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 40 years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed
a timely notice of appeal.

      Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal
is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional
evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to
be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

      A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than
forty-five days has passed and no pro se response has been filed.

      We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error
in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders
brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds
for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

      Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

                                       PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.
Do Not Publish - TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

                                         2