Court Opinion

ID: 2366856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:15:48.432398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:07.237889
License: Public Domain

249 P.3d 596 (2011)
2011 UT App 63
LINDON CITY, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Raymond STEWART, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 20110036-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
March 10, 2011.
Raymond Stewart, Draper, Appellant Pro Se.
Brian K. Haws, Pleasant Grove, for Appellee.
Before Judges McHUGH, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.

DECISION
PER CURIAM:
¶ 1 Raymond Stewart seeks to appeal his conviction for speeding after a trial de novo in district court. This is before the court on Lindon City's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
¶ 2 Utah Code section 78A-7-118 provides for criminal appeals from justice courts. See Utah Code Ann. § 78A-7-118 (2008). If a defendant files a timely notice of appeal from a justice court conviction, "a defendant is entitled to a trial de novo in the district court." Id. § 78A-7-118(1). "The right to an `appeal' from a court not of record is satisfied by provision for a trial de novo in a court of record." Dean v. Henriod, 1999 UT App 50, ¶ 9, 975 P.2d 946. "The decision of the district court is final and may not be appealed unless the district court rules on the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance." Utah Code Ann. § 78A-7-118(7).
¶ 3 This case originated in justice court. The district court did not rule on the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance in convicting Stewart after a trial de novo. Accordingly, the district court's decision is final and this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.
¶ 4 Dismissed.