Court Opinion

ID: 9830497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:15:03.493758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:23.564611
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Our attention has been called to an agreement made by the attorneys for- appellants to waive assignments 4, 6, 10, 11, 18, 20, 21, and 26, and that the “same are not urged or insisted upon,” which agreement was filed in this court on June 5, 1911, two days before the cause was submitted, and the writer of the opinion failed to notice the waiver. No reason whatever is assigned for the waiver of the assignments, each of which is vigorously presented in the brief.
The only assignments of error upon which an error could be sustained having been waived by the appellants, an affirmance must necessarily follow.
We find that there was evidence upon which the jury could base the verdict in favor of appellee, and this conclusion disposes of the assignments of error attacking the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Great leniency has been exercised in considering several of the assignments, which are presented without a due regard for the rules.
A rehearing is granted, our former judgment is set aside, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.