Court Opinion

ID: 9414702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 16:00:54.727164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:57.273754
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 23-1621
                         ___________________________

                             United States of America,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                           v.

                                   Donna Jenkins,

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                        ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: July 19, 2023
                               Filed: August 2, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Donna Jenkins appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after Jenkins
pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief

      1
        The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of
the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that Jenkins’s sentence was not
unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v.
Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

      We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                      ______________________________

                                        -2-