Court Opinion

ID: 9676120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 05:15:32.300043+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:44.208971
License: Public Domain

Concurring opinion by
Justice ROACH.
As to Appellant’s May 2002 trial, I join Parts III.A., III.B., III.D., III.E. and III.F. of the majority opinion. However, because there is no likelihood that the jury issues, as discussed in Part III.C., will be present at retrial, I do not believe that we should address them. See lce v. Commonwealth, 667 S.W.2d 671, 680 (Ky.1984) (“Since we have reversed this case for the reasons previously given, we will not discuss the other points raised by appellant inasmuch as they are unlikely to recur on retrial of this case.”); Terry v. Common*474wealth, 153 S.W.3d 794, 797 (Ky.2005) (“We mil also address other issues that are likely to recur upon retrial.”).
As to the March 2003 trial, I join Parts IV.B., IV.C. and IV.D. of the majority opinion. I concur in result only as to Part IV.A.