Court Opinion

ID: 76468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-27 00:00:39+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:37.198324
License: Public Domain

358 F.3d 1311
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charles EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-16095.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
February 5, 2004.

Floyd M. Buford, Jr., Buford & Buford, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Charles L. Calhoun, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and BIRCH and FARRIS*, Circuit Judges.
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

1
Evans contends that his conviction is not a controlled substance offense because it involved the delivery of chalk rather than cocaine. Prior circuit authority has considered and answered the precise questions raised by his appeal.

2
There is no dispute that Evans pleaded guilty to an offense covered by the controlled substance statute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

3
Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a)(2), we look only to the elements of the crime of conviction and not the conduct underlying the crime. United States v. Lipsey, 40 F.3d 1200, 1201 (11th Cir.1994); See also United States v. Frazier, 89 F.3d 1501 (11th Cir.1996). A conviction for attempt required proof only that Evans possessed the mens rea required for the underlying crime and took a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. United States v. Carothers, 121 F.3d 659, 661 (11th Cir.1997).

4
A defendant is a "career offender" if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years old at the time the defendant committed the instant offense; (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense; and (3) the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.

5
These requirements were met here.

6
AFFIRMED.

Notes:

*
 Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation