Court Opinion

ID: 8428977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 05:02:09.859967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:34.571881
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Reginald Lucas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens complaint * under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lucas v. Barnhill, No. CA-04-87 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).