Court Opinion

ID: 2896904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:49:56.033151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:25.470041
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0080-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 5, 2008

______________________________

DANNY RAY BUSCH, JR., APPELLANT

V.

MARVIN MEINKE AND PATTI MEINKE, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-597,542; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
          On July 17, 2008, the parties filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.  By letter
of July 18, 2008, this Court requested that the parties amend the motion in order to clarify
the relief requested.  On July 25, 2008, Danny Ray Busch, Jr., filed Appellant’s Motion to
Dismiss Appeal in which he represents that he and Appellees, Marvin Meinke and Patti
Meinke, have compromised and settled their differences.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). 
Pursuant to the motion, the parties seek to have this appeal dismissed with the parties
bearing their own costs.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  We grant the motion.
 
          Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and costs are taxed against the party incurring
them.  Having dismissed the appeal at Danny Ray Busch’s request, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                                           Patrick A. Pirtle
                                                                                 Justice