Court Opinion

ID: 3665207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:15:28.513938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:56.901590
License: Public Domain

CLARKSON and DEVIN, JJ., concur in result.
Civil action to enjoin the holding of an election in Haywood County on the question of setting up and operating therein county liquor control stores under the provisions of chapter 49 of Public Laws 1937.
The action was instituted against the county board of elections. Thereafter David N. Cabe, a citizen, taxpayer and qualified voter of Haywood County, in behalf of himself and others, citizens, taxpayers and qualified voters of said county, was permitted to become a party defendant.
The record discloses that, acting under the provisions of chapter 49, Public Laws 1937, upon petition of registered voters of Haywood *Page 213 
County filed with it, the board of elections of said county has called an election at which there shall be submitted to the qualified voters of said county the question of setting up and operating liquor stores therein.
Plaintiffs in their complaint challenge the sufficiency of the petition on which the board of elections acted. Temporary injunction was signed and served. All defendants have answered.
On hearing of motion of defendants to dissolve the injunction, the court below finds, among other things, "that the petition upon which the election referred to in the pleadings was called fails to show affirmatively that the persons signing said petition voted in the last election for Governor of North Carolina, or were qualified so to vote; and it further appearing that the answer filed by the board of elections of Haywood County admits that the petitions filed with said board calling for said election do not designate the signers other than that they are duly qualified voters of Haywood County, and that the said defendants in receiving said petitions and in ordering said election counted the signers thereof, but had no way of determining whether or not said signers were duly and properly registered, and had no knowledge or information as to whether or not the signers of said petition were persons who voted in the last election for Governor of North Carolina."
From judgment continuing the injunction to the final hearing, the defendant David N. Cabe appealed to the Supreme Court and assigns error.
The appellant, David N. Cabe, excepted to the judgment entered below, and, on this appeal, assigns as error the signing of the judgment. This is the only question presented. The assignment is not tenable.
The act relating to the setting up and operating county liquor control stores requires as condition precedent that the question be submitted to and approved by the qualified voters of such county, at an election called "by the board of elections of such county only upon the written request of the board of county commissioners therein, or upon a petition to said board of elections signed by at least fifteen per centum of the registered voters in said county that voted in the last election for Governor." Section 25, chapter 49, Public Laws 1937.
On the findings of fact, to which there is no exception, the court below properly continued the injunction to the hearing.
"Where the main purpose of an act is to obtain a permanent injunction and the evidence raises serious question as to the existence of facts *Page 214 
which if established would entitled the plaintiff to the relief demanded, the usual practice is to continue the temporary restraining order to the hearing." Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N.C. 444, 171 S.E. 635, and cases there cited.
Whether the defendants will be able to show at the trial that the signers of the petition have the qualifications required by the statute is not now before this Court.
The judgment below is
Affirmed.
CLARKSON and DEVIN, J. J., concur in this result.