Court Opinion

ID: 9779693
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 00:35:43.227045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:23:21.757337
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE KILBRIDE, specially concurring: I specially concur only because the majority opinion contains a harmless-error discussion of Nolan v. Weil-McLain, 233 Ill. 2d 416 (2009), that is inconsistent with my prior position in that small portion of Nolan. I acknowledge, however, that the harmless-error ruling in Nolan represents this court’s holding. Moreover, I completely agree with the majority’s conclusion in the present appeal that the trial court’s error was harmless and does not require a remand for a new trial. Thus, I specially concur only to explain my current acceptance of the majority analysis of Nolan in light of my prior separate writing.