Court Opinion

ID: 617773
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-11-23 19:43:35+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:42.084194
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying various motions in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Little,
  
  No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. July 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.