Court Opinion

ID: 4014613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-11 18:00:53.390913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:53.363825
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  In a dispute that began with a disagreement over the elevation of a culvert, a contractor sued a utility district, a homeowners’ association, and two private persons in state court. When federal constitutional claims were added, the matter was removed to federal court. Sixteen months later, after ample discovery and numerous pleadings, the district court issued a sufficiently comprehensive order, addressing the pertinent issues, that granted summary judgment for the defendants on all the federal claims and remanded to state court on any remaining claims under state law.
 

  We have examined the briefs and pertinent portions of the record, have reviewed the applicable law, and have heard the arguments of counsel. The plaintiff has not shown any federal constitutional violation or any other actionable wrong. The judgment is AFFIRMED., essentially for the reasons ably stated by the district court. The appellant’s motion to strike is DENIED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.