Court Opinion

ID: 9828166
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:10:27.486025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:45.024567
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Supplementing its motion for rehearing, appellant makes the following suggestion for ¿mendment of our opinion and judgment on original submission:
“Now comes the appellant, Holland Texas Hypotheek Bank, in the above-entitled and numbered cause, and, supplementing its motion for rehearing heretofore filed herein, moves the court that, in the event, upon rehearing hereof, the court should refuse to relieve appellant from the necessity of executing the bond heretofore required of it as a condition of the dissolution of the injunction in this case, then, in that event, the injunction granted by the lower court be dissolved in so far as it prohibits the execution of said judgment against the appellees John H. Broocks and wife, Daura Brooeks, and that this court, if it deems that justice requires it, affirm the judgment of the lower court in so far as it prohibits the execution of said judgment against the sureties on said supersedeas bond and eliminate from the judgment of this court heretofore entered the requirement that appellant execute a bond protecting- said sureties.”
In accordance with the foregoing prayer of appellant, it is ordered that the judgment of the lower court, enjoining appellant from issuing amexecution against the sureties on the supersedeas .bond and those named as *1083sureties, be, and the same is hereby, in all things affirmed, according to the decree of the lower court, but that this order shall in no wise affect appellant’s right to execution and order of sale against appellees John H. Broocks and wife, Laura Broocks.