Court Opinion

ID: 2887854
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 19:32:12.031514+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:58.130312
License: Public Domain

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION V. VAWTER

NO. 07-01-0037-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 28, 2002

______________________________

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, APPELLANT

V.

DAVID VAWTER, ET AL., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 11TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 1999-32545; HONORABLE MARK DAVIDSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
	On January 18, 2002, appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation formerly known as Exxon 
Corporation filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to Settlement according to
agreement of the parties and in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  The motion
includes a certificate of conference representing that counsel for appellees agrees to the
motion, and signature of counsel for appellees by permission. 
	Without passing on the merits of the case, the Motion to Vacate Judgment is
granted.  The judgment of the trial court signed on September 21, 2000, styled David
Vawter and John Lazaris v. Exxon Corporation, Exxon Company, U.S.A., No. 1999-32545, 
is vacated and the case is dismissed.  TRAP 42.1(a)(1); TRAP 43.2(e).  
	All costs are assessed to the parties incurring the same.  Having dismissed the
appeal at appellant's request and pursuant to settlement agreement, no motion for
rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

						Phil Johnson
						    Justice

Do not publish.