Court Opinion

ID: 2899703
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 00:14:03.613213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:11.607197
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-09-0004-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 26, 2009

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF T.A.M., J.A.M. AND S.M.M., 

Children

_________________________________

FROM THE 320
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 74,777-D; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Joann McKinney appeals the denial of a motion for new trial wherein her parental rights were terminated.  We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

On June 27, 2008, the trial court signed an order terminating McKinney’s parental rights to T.A.M., J.A.M. and S.M.M.  On July 24, 2008, McKinney filed a motion for new trial, and a hearing on the motion was convened in August of 2008.  Yet, because the trial court determined that it needed to recuse itself, it recessed the proceeding.  On October 7, 2008, a new judge was appointed to preside over the matter but did not act upon the motion by written order.  It was not until January 2, 2009, that McKinney filed her notice of appeal.  Her statement of points on appeal was filed on January 16, 2009.  

 Given that termination of parental rights was involved, the appeal was accelerated
.  
Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 
§109.002(a) (Vernon 2008).  So, anyone seeking a new trial was obligated to request one no later than the 15
th
 day after the date the final order was signed, 
i.e.
 July 11, 2008.  
Id.
 §263.405(b).  Nonetheless, a motion for new trial, even if timely filed, would not extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal.  
Id.
 §263.405(c).  Consequently, McKinney’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before 20 days after the day the trial court executed the termination order, 
i.e. 
on July 16, 2008.  
Tex. R. App. P
. 26.1(b).  Because it was not filed until January of 2009, we have no jurisdiction over the proceeding and must dismiss it.  

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Brian Quinn

          Chief Justice