Court Opinion

ID: 9829211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:05:29.355279+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:58.386662
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
This case is, in all substantial respects, a companion case to that of S. L. Hume v. R. B. Carpenter et al., for which reason we adopt as the opinion in this case the opinion this day rendered on appellant’s motion for rehearing in that case; and the facts being fully developed, and the jury having found the value of the lots in controversy, as well as that of the improvements thereon, it becomes our duty to render judgment for appellant for the lots in controversy, subject to the condition as required by chapter 2, title 128, Revised Statutes of 1911, and it is so ordered.
Motion granted. Reversed and rendered.