Court Opinion

ID: 4487351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-17 22:00:43.0815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:27.827394
License: Public Domain

*509OPINION.
Littleton:
Counsel for taxpayer contends that the directors of the corporation are the sole judges as to what constitutes reasonable compensation and that since they determined upon $20,000 as a salary to be paid the president and general manager for 1918 the *510Commissioner has no authority to reduce the amount notwithstanding the fact that the salary was based upon earnings or was a distribution of the profits of the corporation in the form of compensation. This contention, of course, can not be sustained.
Section 234 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1918 provides:
That iii computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered * * *
Under the provision of this section the Commissioner not only has the authority but it is his duty to determine under all the facts obtainable the reasonableness or unreasonableness of deductions by a corporate taxpayer of compensation paid. The Commissioner, upon the evidence before him, determined that a deduction of $16,000 for compensation for the services rendered taxpayer by its president and general manager during the year 1918 was reasonable. The evidence before us does not justify a deduction for compensation of an amount in excess of that determined by the Commissioner.