Court Opinion

ID: 3718620
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:50:31.0464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:28.025295
License: Public Domain

{¶ 374} I concur with the majority as to its analysis and disposition of this case except for the disposition of the third assignment of error.
 {¶ 375} I find that appellant sufficiently demonstrated the traceability of his separate funds that were used to purchase the Cornwall property prior to the marriage. I would, therefore, reverse the trial court as to its finding that the current residence of the parties was marital property.
 {¶ 376} The trial court finds that appellant's testimony was not sufficient to establish the traceability of this asset. But, there was some documentary evidence to support appellant's claim. While I understand the trial court's concern that there was not more documentation presented by appellant, I find his testimony to be sufficient in this case. The trial court did not find that appellant's testimony was not credible. *Page 1