Court Opinion

ID: 990521
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:22:41.668087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:33.391341
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MANUEL RAMON LUNA,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-
91-075-WMN, CA-95-1952-WMN)

Submitted:   September 20, 1996           Decided:   October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Ramon Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and denying his motion for reconsidera-

tion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-

ing of the district court. United States v. Luna, Nos. CR-91-075-

WMN; CA-95-1952-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1995; Feb. 12, 1996). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2