Court Opinion

ID: 9832078
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:36:00.956401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:41.830531
License: Public Domain

On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing appellants in paragraph 6 thereof request the court as follows:
“The appellants move and request the court to make additional statement in. the paragraph of the opinion setting forth the negligence urged against the railroad company, showing that, in connection with the negligence set forth in this paragraph, there was an allegation that the defendant was not malting such use of its property as others ordinarily do and that the defendant was not maiding such use of its property as owners of property use in their ordinary businesses in the way in which men of prudence are accustomed to use them for the reasons specified in such petition,"
Their pleadings contain substantially the allegation as above requested, and we so find, and in this respect appellants’ motion is granted. In all other respects it is overruled.
Granted in part and in part overruled.