Court Opinion

ID: 9540874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:20:25.942843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:23.939818
License: Public Domain

Hill, Chief Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment of affirmance. I would abolish our inconsistent verdict rule in criminal cases. See Dunn v. United States, 284 U. S. 390, 393-394 (52 SC 189, 76 LE 356) (1932); United States *388v. Powell, 469 U. S. (105 SC 471, 83 LE2d 461) (1984).
Decided May 10, 1985 —
Rehearing denied May 28, 1985.
Brimberry, Kaplan, MacDougald & Revell, Jerry W. Brimberry, for appellant.
Hobart M. Hind, District Attorney, John W. Hogg, L. Earl Jones, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Eddie Snelling, Jr., Senior Attorney, for appellee.