Court Opinion

ID: 8374839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-20 16:05:49.871291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:24.320762
License: Public Domain

82556: Case View
	
	
	
	
	
		

	
	
	
	

	
		
	
	
	
     

	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	

	
	
	 
	

	

Nevada
Appellate Courts

Appellate Case Management System

C-Track, the browser based CMS for Appellate Courts

			
			
				
				
					Case Search
				
			
				
				
					Participant Search
				
			
			
		

Cases

							
								Case Search
							
						

							
								Participant Search
							
						

22-30581: This document is currently unavailable. If you need a copy of this document, please contact Clerk's Office at (775)684-1600.	

Disclaimer: The information and documents available here should not be relied upon as an official record of action.Only filed documents can be viewed.  Some documents received in a case may not be available for viewing.Some documents originating from a lower court, including records and appendices, may not be available for viewing.For official records, please contact the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Nevada at (775) 684-1600.

Case Information: 82556

Short Caption:UBER TECH., INC. VS. ROYZCourt:Supreme Court

Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A810843Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other

Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed

Replacement:Panel Assigned:
					En Banc
					

To SP/Judge:03/09/2021 / Jimmerson, JamesSP Status:Completed

Oral Argument:08/02/2022 at 10:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City

Submission Date:08/02/2022How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+
						Party Information
					

RoleParty NameRepresented By

AppellantRasier, LLCKaren L. Bashor
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						Ryan T. Gormley
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						D. Lee Roberts, Jr.
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						Douglas M. Rowan
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						

AppellantRasier-CA, LLCKaren L. Bashor
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						Ryan T. Gormley
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						D. Lee Roberts, Jr.
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						Douglas M. Rowan
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						

AppellantUber Technologies, IncKaren L. Bashor
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						Ryan T. Gormley
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						D. Lee Roberts, Jr.
							(Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC/Las Vegas)
						Douglas M. Rowan
							(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas)
						

RespondentAndrea Eileen WorkNatalie Stephanie Pang
							(Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
						Trevor M. Quirk
							(Quirk Law Firm)
						Kevin Francis Ruf
							(Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
						Jerold Sullivan
							(Sullivan & Sullivan)
						

RespondentMegan RoyzNatalie Stephanie Pang
							(Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
						Trevor M. Quirk
							(Quirk Law Firm)
						Kevin Francis Ruf
							(Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP/Los Angeles)
						Jerold Sullivan
							(Sullivan & Sullivan)
						

+
						Due Items
					

Due DateStatusDue ItemDue From

10/24/2022OpenRemittitur

Docket Entries

DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document

02/26/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee due for Appeal. (SC)

02/26/2021Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)21-05813

02/26/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 10 days. (SC)21-05816

03/08/2021Filing FeeFiling Fee Paid. $250.00 from Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial.  Check no. 159736. (SC)

03/08/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program.  Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed.  Docketing Statement mailed to counsel for appellants - due: 21 days. (SC)21-06714

03/09/2021Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program.  Settlement Judge: James J. Jimmerson. (SC)21-06787

03/16/2021Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Not Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is not appropriate for mediation.  All parties are in agreement that no compromise is possible. (SC)21-07568

03/17/2021Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. This appeal is removed from the settlement program.  Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 90 days opening brief. (SC)21-07705

03/29/2021Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement.  (SC)21-08941

03/31/2021Transcript RequestFiled Appellants'  Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)21-09340

06/15/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Time to File Opening Brief and Appendix. (SC)21-17272

06/16/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved for Opening Brief and Appendix. Due date is July 15, 2021. (SC)21-17318

07/15/2021BriefFiled Appellants' Opening Brief. (SC)21-20500

07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellants' Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 1. (SC)21-20501

07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 2. (SC)21-20502

07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 3. (SC)21-20503

07/15/2021AppendixFiled Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief. Vol. 4. (SC)21-20504

09/08/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order to File Answering Brief. To date, respondents have not filed the answering brief or otherwise communicated with this court.  
Respondents shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve the answering brief. (SC)21-26049

09/14/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Submit Answering Brief. (SC)21-26607

09/21/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. The parties have filed a stipulation for a second extension of time to file the answering brief.  The stipulation is treated as a joint motion and granted.  Respondent's answering brief due: October 15, 2021. (SC)21-27285

10/15/2021BriefFiled Respondents' Answering Brief. (SC)21-29658

10/28/2021MotionFiled Stipulation to Extend Reply Brief Deadline. (SC)21-31074

10/28/2021Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Motion/Stipulation Approved for Reply Brief.  Due date December 15, 2021. (SC)21-31149

12/14/2021MotionFiled Appellants' Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief. (SC)21-35655

12/28/2021Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion.  Appellants shall have until January 14, 2022, to file and serve the reply brief.  (SC)21-36834

01/14/2022MotionFiled Appellants' Motion for Excess Pages/Exceed Word Limit on Reply Brief. (SC)22-01544

01/14/2022BriefFiled Appellants' Reply Brief. (SC)22-01546

01/25/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion.  Appellants' motion for leave to file a reply brief in excess of the type-volume limitation is granted.  The reply brief was filed on January 14, 2022.  (SC)22-02471

01/25/2022Case Status UpdateBriefing Completed/To Screening.  (SC)

03/15/2022MotionFiled Respondents' Motion to Associate Kevin Ruf. (SC)22-08225

03/15/2022MotionFiled Respondents' Motion to Associate Counsel Natalie Stephanie Pang. (SC)22-08228

03/29/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motions. Respondents have filed motions to associate attorneys Kevin Francis Ruf and Natalie Stephanie Pang of the law firm of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP in this matter pursuant to SCR 42.  The motions are granted.  Mr. Ruf and Ms. Pang shall be permitted to appear on behalf of respondents in this appeal.  (SC)22-09748

05/26/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Submitting for Decision Without Oral Argument. (SC)22-16816

06/21/2022Order/ProceduralFiled Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This court has determined that oral argument may be of assistance in resolving this matter. Accordingly, this matter is scheduled for oral argument on August 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. in Carson City. Argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. (SC)22-19554

07/18/2022Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. (SC)22-22544

08/02/2022Case Status UpdateOral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the En Banc Court. {SC}

09/29/2022Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Reversed and remanded with instructions." Before the Court En Banc. Author: Silver, J. Majority: Parraguirre/Hardesty/Cadish/Silver/Pickering. Herndon, J., with whom Stiglich, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. 138 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 66. En Banc. (SC).22-30581

Combined Case View