Court Opinion

ID: 9686198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:33:30.251319+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:15.898740
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
On rehearing appellant insists the Court failed to address itself to the refusal of the Trial Court to compel production of prior written statements of several State’s witnesses for cross-examination purposes. These are the same statements that appellant sought production of in his pretrial motion. So far as we can ascertain from the record, these statements were not used by the prosecution during trial. They were not exhibited to the jury or used by the witnesses to refresh their recollection, and no predicate was laid by the defense to show that these statements were in any way contradictory of the witnesses’ testimony at trial.
Opinion extended, application overruled.
CATES, J., not sitting.