Court Opinion

ID: 9456906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:05:23.626881+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:08.243197
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
In this case against certain city officials of Covington, Georgia, appellants attack an ordinance of the city regulating parades, demonstrations, assemblies and picketing, under which they were arrested, and sought a temporary and preliminary injunction. After a hearing the Court denied appellants’ motion for a temporary and preliminary injunction; the record before us does not indicate that the court dismissed the complaint.
We affirm the judgment of the district court denying injunctive relief and remand the case with direction to dismiss the complaint. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S. Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U. S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792 (1971). See also: Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d- (5th Cir. 1971).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.