Court Opinion

ID: 2843828
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 15:49:18.754669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:04.547711
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued March 18, 2010

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas

NO. 01-09-01036-CV
          

MTSANDOVAL, Appellant

V.

OFFICE MAX, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2007-19734

MEMORANDUM OPINION
          Appellant MTSandoval has neither established indigence, nor paid all the
required fees.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless
indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. §§ 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2007); 51.941(a)
(Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2009) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees
Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals).  After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R.
App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of
case).
          Appellant has neither established indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to
pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing
requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no
trial court clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault).  After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
          We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution due to nonpayment of the
appellate filing fee and no payment for arrangement to pay for the trial court clerk’s
record.  All pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Massengale.