Court Opinion

ID: 995211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:34:10.112994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:50.807216
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

DREW HOWARD BRINSON,

                                           Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-387-CES)

Submitted:   May 28, 1998                 Decided:   June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Drew Howard Brinson, Appellant Pro Se. Terry L. Wooten, Marshall
Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Drew Howard Brinson seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Brinson, No. CR-92-387-CES
(D.S.C. Jan. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2