Court Opinion

ID: 9413733
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 23:20:53.929801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:28.099718
License: Public Domain

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge,
dissenting:
This holding is contrary to United States v. Henry, 709 F.2d 298 (5th Cir.1983) as elaborated in United States v. Cataldo, 832 F.2d 869, 873 (5th Cir.1987). This is not a case where both sentences make the sentencing scheme illegal. There is one, and only one, illegal sentence/ It is the sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). That is the only sentence attacked by Hernandez, and the court could do nó more than vacate it.