Court Opinion

ID: 995226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:34:18.222864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:59.274835
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6404

DEXTER DRAKE COFFIN, III,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. W. RITTENHOUSE, Acting Superintendent,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-314-R)

Submitted:   May 28, 1998                   Decided:   June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dexter Drake Coffin, III, Appellant Pro Se.    Linwood Theodore
Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Coffin v. Rittenhouse, No. CA-97-314-R (W.D. Va. Jan.
16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2