Court Opinion

ID: 9891642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-19 14:00:48.418075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.714432
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12701   Document: 7-1     Date Filed: 10/19/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-12701
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      TABATHER GILES,
                                                    Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      NOLAND HEALTH GREENBRIAR SERVICE,

                                                           Defendant,

      RAVEN HINSON,
      PAM DUNS,
      TAMIKA BALLARD,
      MELISSA ALLARD,
USCA11 Case: 23-12701     Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 10/19/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-12701

                                                    Defendants-Appellees.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                     D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cv-00007-ACA
                          ____________________

      Before WILSON, BRANCH, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Tabather Giles, pro se, appeals the district court’s February
      27, 2023, final order dismissing her complaint. The statutory time
      limit required her to file a notice of appeal on or before March 29,
      2023, 30 days after the district court entered its judgment. See
      28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The instant notice
      of appeal, filed on August 17, 2023, is therefore untimely, and we
      lack jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300
      (11th Cir. 2010).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.