Court Opinion

ID: 591601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:01.328353
License: Public Domain

976 F.2d 727
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Henry Alexander CROCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6563.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 10, 1992Decided:  Sept. 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CR-85-328-H, CA-91-3327-H)
Henry Alexander Crockett, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Michael DiBiagio, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Henry Alexander Crockett appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Crockett, Nos.  CR-85-328-H, CA-91-3327-H (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED