Court Opinion

ID: 4359154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-16 15:35:45.752616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:30.527014
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                       JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 16, 2019

                                     NO. 03-18-00681-CR

                              Charles Wayne Bryant, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

       APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
       BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY
   DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                       JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 16, 2019

                                     NO. 03-18-00682-CR

                              Charles Wayne Bryant, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

       APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
       BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY
   DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.