Court Opinion

ID: 3500030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:07:09.815738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:15:58.205137
License: Public Domain

Defendant appeals from an order modifying a decree of divorce as to the custody of a minor child. A decree of divorce between the parties rendered July 30, 1924, gave the custody of the daughter Margaret Belle Winn to defendant. The trial court, after full hearing on the application of plaintiff, modified the decree and awarded the custody of the child to the father, who already had the custody of another daughter. After the divorce was granted, *Page 588 
plaintiff remarried. Defendant remarried three different times. During the time since the divorce, defendant has never had the child with her. None of the men she has married furnished a home. The child was left with its maternal grandmother. Defendant made her home in and around Chicago, traveling, running an elevator at Marshall Field's, and singing and dancing in theaters and other places of entertainment. There was no finding the child had not been given a good home by its grandmother. The contest here is between the father and the mother of the child. In the determination of the case the trial court took into consideration the multiplicity of defendant's marriages and the brevity of her attachments. He properly held the welfare of the child was the polar star for the guidance of the court in the determination of the case, and gave the father the custody of the child, that the two daughters of the parties might be reared together and make their home with plaintiff without interference or hindrance on the part of defendant, until they should attain the age of 14 years, or until the further order of the court. We think this a proper disposition of the case, and
The order of the trial court is affirmed, but without costs.
FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 589