Court Opinion

ID: 881013
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-05 00:42:29.817109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:24.631547
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 40176

STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )      2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 467
                                                 )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )      Filed: April 26, 2013
                                                 )
v.                                               )      Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                 )
JASPER EMMITT WILCOX,                            )      THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                 )      OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                      )      BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                 )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Timothy Lee Hansen, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with three years
       determinate, for felony injury to a child, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                     Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
                                 and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Jasper Emmitt Wilcox pled guilty to felony injury to a child. Idaho Code § 18-1501(1).
The district court sentenced Wilcox to a unified term of ten years, with three years determinate.
Wilcox appeals, contending his sentence is excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011,
1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
1
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Wilcox’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2