Court Opinion

ID: 57956
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 02:21:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:22.083303
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                January 30, 2008
                                No. 07-20611
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE BARRON GONZALEZ, also known as Jose Barron-Gonzalez, also known
as Fernando Garza, also known as Jose Gonzalez, also known as Juan Jose
Barron Gonzales, also known as Jose B Gonzalez, also known as Fernando
Gonzalez, also known as Jose Gonzalez Barron

                                           Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:07-CR-54-1

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Barron Gonzalez raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.
224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624,

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 07-20611

625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202).
The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                      2