Court Opinion

ID: 2863925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:55:09.812326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:08:11.971167
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00682-CR

Johnny Barr, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 001867, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

The district court found appellant Johnny Barr guilty of aggravated assault and
assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for ten years.  See
Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02 (West 1994).

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________

				Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed:   June 29, 2001

Do Not Publish