Court Opinion

ID: 9572706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:43:56.084067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:50.404775
License: Public Domain

Levin, J.
As set forth in the concurring opinion, the search of Coleman’s purse did not amount to a search of her person.1 The search was permissible *126as a search of a container in which items specified in the warrant might be found.2
Because the search of Coleman’s purse was not a search of her person, there is no need to consider Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85; 100 S Ct 338; 62 L Ed 2d 238 (1979), People v Arterberry, 431 Mich 381; 429 NW2d 574 (1988), or the other authorities cited in the concurring opinion concerning a search of a person.
Reversed and remanded.
Brickley, Cavanagh, and Archer, JJ., concurred with Levin, J.

 See post, p 134.

 Id