Court Opinion

ID: 7173200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:28:39.291708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:48.224905
License: Public Domain

ROGERS, J.
, Although there is a different tract of land involved, the issues in this case are identical with the issues in the consolidated cases of Charles F. Noble v. Mrs. Mary J. Plouf, Mrs. Mary Agnew, and Mrs. Eva G. Powell (No. 23769), 97 South. 599,1 this day decided. For the reasons set forth in the opinion therein, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
DAWKINS, OVERTON, and ST. PAUL, JJ., dissent.

 Ante, p. 429.