Court Opinion

ID: 9511789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:08:25.176333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:10.872162
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE NELSON
concurs.
¶20 I concur in the Court’s decision as to Issue 2.1 specially concur in the Court’s decision as to Issue 1 because State v. Moody, 2006 MT 305, 334 Mont. 517, 148 P.3d 662, is the law of the land as to that Issue. That said, I continue to maintain that the “home visit” issue in Moody was wrongly decided. Moody, ¶¶ 34-71 (Nelson, J., dissenting).
¶21 With that caveat, I concur.
JUSTICE COTTER joins in the concurrence of JUSTICE NELSON.