Court Opinion

ID: 7797411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-03 15:04:03.485135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:37.127213
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                 No. 21-1254
                             Filed August 3, 2022

MICHAEL LEE RILEY,
     Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JENNIFER MARIE BENAGE,
     Defendant-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Jennifer A. Miller,

Judge.

      Michael Lee Riley appeals the denial of his application to modify the child

custody decree. AFFIRMED.

      Ernest Kersten, Fort Dodge, for appellant.

      Paul Berchenbriter of Iowa Legal Aid, Cedar Rapids, for appellee.

      Considered by Bower, C.J., Greer, J., and Scott, S.J.*

      *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206

(2022).
                                         2

SCOTT, Senior Judge.

      Michael Lee Riley and Jennifer Marie Benage have one child together.

Their stipulated custody and support decree was approved by the court and filed

in July 2020. The decree granted the parties joint legal custody and placed the

child in Jennifer’s physical care, provided a parenting schedule, and set child

support.

      On October 21, 2021, Michael sought to modify the custody decree, place

the child in his physical care, order supervised visits, and suspend his child

support. He alleged that on September 2, Jennifer had been intoxicated and

assaulted him and the child.

      After a hearing, the district court found:

              In September of 2020, Jennifer came home from work to find
      that Michael had entered her home and was sleeping in her bed. At
      some point in the evening, she woke Michael up and asked him to
      leave her house and he indicated to her that he would be taking [the
      child] with him. Jennifer, who had been drinking and was intoxicated,
      became angry and hit Michael and attempted to pull [the child] from
      him and in the process scratched [the child] multiple times. Michael
      left with [the child] and Jennifer called the police. Due to the injuries
      sustained by both Michael and [the child], Jennifer was charged with
      domestic assault and child endangerment. These charges were
      eventually amended down and Jennifer pled guilty to disorderly
      conduct and public intoxication. Michael testified that he requested
      that the charges be amended down to simple misdemeanors so that
      Jennifer could keep her job . . . .

      The court noted the incident resulted in a child-abuse assessment and the

child’s temporary removal from Jennifer.       Jennifer complied with all required

services, successfully completed alcohol treatment, and progressed from

supervised visits to the child being returned to her care; there is no further

involvement with the department of human services.
                                         3

       The court expressed concern about the incident, but found Jennifer did not

intend to harm the child and had immediately taken steps to address her

substance-abuse issue. It concluded the incident was isolated and not likely to

reoccur.    Because Michael had failed to prove a substantial change of

circumstances, his application to modify the child custody decree was denied.

       Michael appeals, challenging the court’s finding that no substantial change

in circumstances had been proved. See In re Marriage of Frederici, 338 N.W.2d

156, 158 (Iowa 1983) (stating modification of custody requires the applicant to

establish a substantial change of circumstances, more or less permanent, related

to the welfare of the child); see also Melchiori v. Kooi, 644 N.W.2d 365, 368 (Iowa

Ct. App. 2002) (stating an applicant in a modification action must show the ability

to offer superior care). On our de novo review, see Iowa R. App. P. 6.907, we

agree with the district court’s findings and conclusions. Further opinion would be

of little value. We affirm. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).

       AFFIRMED.