Court Opinion

ID: 9378678
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-12 08:08:55.569851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:38.018107
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed
March 9, 2023.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                             NO. 14-21-00537-CV

                            ILIA FARD, Appellant
                                       V.
                       ZEINAB HAJIZADEH, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 312th District Court
                           Harris County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 2019-85225

                MEMORANDUM CONCURRING OPINION
      While I concur in this court’s judgment and otherwise join the majority
opinion, Husband did not timely preserve a complaint for appellate review
regarding the trial court’s granting of his counsel’s amended unopposed motion to
withdraw because Husband signed the motion, indicating that he “agreed and
approved.” See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a) (preservation of appellate complaints).
While Husband’s motion for new trial contains seven pages discussing his
counsel’s withdrawal, Husband does not argue that his signature on the amended
unopposed motion to withdraw was not consensual. Accordingly, he waived that
issue.

                                     /s/       Charles A. Spain
                                               Justice

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan (Hassan, M., majority).

                                           2