Court Opinion

ID: 4308532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-08-30 04:24:56.048223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:55.638614
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                             ____________________
                                NO. 09-18-00224-CR
                             ____________________

                      DANIEL WARD HUNTER, Appellant

                                           V.

                        THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                ______________

                     On Appeal from the 359th District Court
                          Montgomery County, Texas
                        Trial Cause No. 16-03-03783-CR
________________________________________________________                _____________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(b). The appellant, Daniel Ward Hunter, did not file a response. It appears

that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R.

App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record,

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

                                           1
      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                           ________________________________
                                                  LEANNE JOHNSON
                                                         Justice

Submitted on August 28, 2018
Opinion Delivered August 29, 2018
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

                                       2