Court Opinion

ID: 3674977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:22:05.136062+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:22:34.147464
License: Public Domain

Criminal prosecution on bill of indictment charging the crime of perjury.
This cause was here at the Fall Term, 1943. See S. v. Hill, 223 N.C. 711, where the facts are fully stated. *Page 783 
When the case again came on for trial in the court below there was a verdict of "guilty as charged." The court pronounced judgment on the verdict and defendant Hill appealed.
The defendant admitted he testified under oath in the original hearing that he was not the person operating a taxi stopped by an officer, that he was not present, and that he did not receive a citation at that time for speeding. His testimony in this respect was material to the issue then being tried. He insists even now it is a case of mistaken identity. Hence his trial on the charge of perjury centered around the issue of identity and that issue has been resolved against him.
The charge of the court construed in the light of the admissions made by defendant is without error. Defendant's other exceptions fail to disclose cause for disturbing the verdict. The judgment must stand.
No error.