Court Opinion

ID: 5417980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:21:51.818949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:06.360785
License: Public Domain

Marsh, J.
This is a motion for an order directing a physical examination. The action was commenced in April, 1920. One week after service of the summons and complaint, and before service of the answer, the plaintiff submitted voluntarily to a physical examination by some physician whose name is not now disclosed and whose report showed some cranial and nervous injury not described in detail, but from which the defendant gained the impression that the fracture of the skull was slight and the nervous condition temporary. On April 29, 1922, an order was entered for a bill of particulars. In the bill served thereunder the plaintiff claims a very serious condition of his nervous system, damage to his right eye and ear and paralysis of the right arm and leg. His condition is described as of the present time.
The plaintiff contends that a physical examination should not be ordered now because of the voluntary examination two years ago. Nothing in the statute, however, expresses any such limitation upon the right granted. Civil Practice Act, § 306. The *324necessity is shown by the claim put forth in the bill of particulars and it is obviously in the interest of justice that the facts should be known concerning the progress of the plaintiff’s injuries and his present condition. The right to permit a second examination for good cause is recognized in Orlando v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co., 109 App. Div. 356. There has been no waiver in open court or any disclosure of the plaintiff’s condition by a previous trial, as in Whitaker v. Staten Island M. R. R. Co., 76 App. Div. 351. Motion granted. Settle order on notice. The physician to make the examination will be named in the order.
Ordered accordingly.