Court Opinion

ID: 9779689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 00:34:44.738662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:19.310044
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE SCHMIDT, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The trial court, after a complete trial, found that it did not have to make a decision or finding as to whether the plaintiffs were employees of GST. This was because the trial court made the factual finding that Marc Pozan did not knowingly permit the unlawful withholding of plaintiffs’ commissions. That finding was supported by the evidence. Whether the evidence would also support the opposite conclusion is irrelevant. We should not retry this case here in the appellate court. I would affirm the trial court in its entirety and, therefore, respectfully dissent from the portions of the majority opinion that reverse and remand for further proceedings.