Court Opinion

ID: 9363330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-13 21:00:52.70276+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:31.265361
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
        FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

                 Filed: January 13, 2023

                       No. 20-5183

           LISA GUFFEY AND CHRISTINE SMITH,
                      APPELLEES

                            v.

  ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
 DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED
                   STATES COURTS,
                     APPELLANT

                Consolidated with 20-5208

       Appeals from the United States District Court
               for the District of Columbia
                   (No. 1:18-cv-01271)

            On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge; HENDERSON**, MILLETT,
PILLARD*, WILKINS, KATSAS, RAO, WALKER, CHILDS, and PAN,
Circuit Judges
                                2

                           ORDER

     Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the
response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote
was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to
participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon
consideration of the foregoing, it is

    ORDERED that the petition be denied.

                          Per Curiam

                                      FOR THE COURT:
                                      Mark J. Langer, Clerk

                            BY:       /s/
                                      Daniel J. Reidy
                                      Deputy Clerk

* Circuit Judge Pillard did not participate in this matter.

** Circuit Judge Henderson would grant the petition for
rehearing en banc. A statement by Circuit Judge Henderson,
dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
     KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting
from the denial of rehearing en banc: For the reasons explained
in my panel dissent, which is hereby incorporated by reference
thereto, Guffey v. Mauskopf, 45 F.4th 442, 452–62 (D.C. Cir.
2022) (Henderson, J., dissenting), I dissent from the denial of
rehearing en banc.