Court Opinion

ID: 698898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:39:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:28.601308
License: Public Domain

59 F.3d 168NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Eugene VENABLE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Ellis B. WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-6278.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.Decided June 26, 1995.

James Eugene Venable, appellant pro se.  Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.*  We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.  Venable v. Wright, No. CA-94-576-3 (E.D. Va.  Jan. 10, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)