Court Opinion

ID: 9830353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:08:29.080014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:47.279917
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In response to the motion of plaintiff in error for additional findings of fact, etc., we find that after the engine tank has been properly placed or “spotted” to receive the oil through the spout, a lantern or light was no longer necessary to the successful filling of the tank, but the spout could then be adjusted to the manhole and the flow of oil started in the darkness, and that it could be ascertained when the tank had been sufficiently filled by feeling in the manhole with the hand. In other particulars, in which we are requested to find additional facts and to correct those found and stated in the opinion, the motion is overruled.
We have carefully examined plaintiff in error's motion for a rehearing, and are of the opinion that the same should be overruled, and it has been so ordered.