Court Opinion

ID: 8281134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 04:36:23.588057+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:40.843369
License: Public Domain

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: As the petition was to remove this suit to the northern district of Illinois instead of to the district where the suit is pending (Judicial Code, § 29 [Act March 3, 1911, c. 231 36 Stat. 1095, U. S. Comp. St. 1913, § 1011]), the proceedings were unauthorized. St. John v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (D. C.) 213 Fed. 685; St. John v. Taintor (D. C.) 220 Fed. 457. The state court not having lost jurisdiction, the learned justice at Special Term had power to set aside and revoke his approval of this bond on removal. The order of January 29, 1915, is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion to set aside the approval of the bond for removal is hereby granted. Jenks, P. J., and Carr, Stapleton, and Putnam, JJ., concur.