Court Opinion

ID: 1007841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:31:22.029862+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:50.405774
License: Public Domain

*669
   
  PER CURIAM.
 

  Raymond McArthur Beall appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for review of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Beall,
  
  No. CR-95-57-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.