Court Opinion

ID: 4552476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-07-31 15:14:28.308527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:18.640304
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                           SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

STEVEN W. SCOTT,
                                                                                        FILED
Claimant Below, Petitioner                                                             July 31, 2020
                                                                                 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
                                                                                 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
vs.)   No. 19-0576 (BOR Appeal No. 2053805)                                          OF WEST VIRGINIA
                   (Claim No. 2016028699)

WQ WATTERS COMPANY,
Employer Below, Respondent

                              MEMORANDUM DECISION
      Petitioner Steven W. Scott, by Counsel Patrick K. Maroney, appeals the decision of the
West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). WQ Watters
Company, by Counsel Timothy E. Huffman, filed a timely response.

        The issue on appeal is temporary total disability benefits. The claims administrator closed
the claim for temporary total disability benefits on September 29, 2017. The Office of Judges
affirmed the decision in its December 21, 2018, Order. The Order was affirmed by the Board of
Review on May 28, 2019.

        The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained
in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately
presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon
consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no
substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is
appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

        Mr. Scott, a union painter, was injured in the course of his employment on May 4, 2016,
when he slipped and fell about five feet to the ground. Mr. Scott had a wellness exam on May 10,
2016, at Doctor’s ImmediCare and reported right leg pain for the past five to seven days. He stated
that he slipped on a roof at work and fell into a hole. He was diagnosed with a traumatic hematoma
and ordered to elevate his leg. He returned on May 12, 2016, for follow up. It was noted that the
left shoulder was not swollen but that Mr. Scott experienced pain with movement. He was
diagnosed with pain in the leg and sprain of the left shoulder. The claims administrator held the
claim compensable for upper right leg contusion on May 18, 2016.

                                                 1
        On May 19, 2016, John Pierson, M.D., treated Mr. Scott for his right leg and left shoulder.
Dr. Pierson noted that Mr. Scott underwent an MRI the previous April for the left shoulder. It
showed a possible small tear which was conservatively treated. He noted that Mr. Scott had
suffered a recent work injury where he fell through a roof and reinjured his shoulder as well as
bruised his thigh. Dr. Pierson diagnosed complete rotator cuff tear or rupture of the left shoulder,
not specified as traumatic; strain of the muscle, fascia, and tendon of the biceps; and contusion of
the right thigh. Physical therapy was recommended for the shoulder.

        Mr. Scott had treated with Dr. Pierson, and other physicians, for the left shoulder prior to
the compensable injury. An April 1, 2016, left shoulder MRI revealed a tendon tear, probably full
thickness. Dr. Pierson saw Mr. Scott a few days later on April 6, 2016, for left shoulder pain. At
that time, Mr. Scott reported a prior left shoulder injury in 2008 and that he had experienced left
shoulder pain off and on since. The pain began most recently two months prior. The left shoulder
pain was constant. Dr. Pierson examined Mr. Scott and diagnosed complete rotator cuff tear or
rupture of the shoulder. He stated that if conservative treatment failed, surgery should be
considered. Mr. Scott then attempted physical therapy and an April 11, 2016, treatment note from
Elk Valley Physical Therapy noted that he was being treated for a complete rotator cuff tear,
impingement syndrome of the left shoulder, and pain in the left shoulder. He was to attend therapy
for eight weeks. It was noted that his treating physician wanted to try physical therapy before
surgery.

       Mr. Scott returned to Dr. Pierson on June 9, 2016, and reported that he continued to have
pain and weakness in the left shoulder which was noted as a recent re-injury. Dr. Pierson stated
that Mr. Scott had a small tear back in April but had sustained a new injury when he fell through
the roof at work. Dr. Pierson again diagnosed complete rotator cuff tear or rupture of the left
shoulder, not specified as traumatic; strain of muscle, fascia, and tendon of the shoulder and upper
arm; impingement syndrome of the left shoulder, and left thigh contusion. Dr. Pierson stated that
Mr. Scott may have worsened the preexisting rotator cuff tear with the compensable injury. He
recommended an MRI. The MRI was performed on June 18, 2016, and showed partial tears and/or
tendonitis, fraying portions of the labrum and fluid adjacent to the biceps tendon. T. Zekan, M.D.,
radiologist, commented that the MRI was similar to the preinjury MRI. On June 23, 2016, Dr.
Pierson noted that he reviewed the MRI and found that the partial tear had progressed to a full tear.
He recommended a left shoulder arthroscopy, subacromial decompression, and labral debridement.
Mr. Scott also reported right thigh pain with activity at that time.

        Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on July 8,
2016, in which he noted that the only compensable condition in the claim was a thigh contusion.
He concluded that Mr. Scott had reached maximum medical improvement. He opined that the right
thigh contusion had fully healed and no further treatment was necessary. The claims administrator
suspended temporary total disability benefits on July 18, 2016, based on Dr. Mukkamala’s
evaluation.

       On July 21, 2016, Dr. Pierson noted that Mr. Scott reported that his left shoulder pain and
weakness was not improving. He also reported that his right thigh pain was still present and worse
with activity. The diagnosis remained complete rotator cuff tear; strain of muscle, fascia, and
                                                 2
tendon of the shoulder and upper arm; and right thigh contusion. Dr. Pierson noted that MRIs were
performed before and after the injury and show a worsening of the rotator cuff from a partial tear
to a full tear. He opined that the left shoulder condition was aggravated by the compensable injury
and recommended surgery, which was performed on September 19, 2016. The post-operative
diagnoses were left shoulder full thickness rotator cuff tear, impingement syndrome of the left
shoulder, and type 1 superior labral tear.

        On July 28, 2016, the claims administrator denied the addition of complete rotator cuff tear
of the left shoulder and strain of muscle, fascia, and tendon of the upper left arm to the claim. It
denied a request for a left shoulder MRI and physical therapy on July 28, 2016. On August 18,
2016, the claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits.

        Mr. Scott testified in a deposition on December 8, 2016, that on the day of the injury he
slipped on a wet painted board and fell about five feet, catching himself with his right thigh and
left shoulder. He finished his shift that day, Thursday, and his shift the following day. He stated
that bruising appeared on his shoulder on Sunday. By Monday after his shift, his leg was swollen
and he could not walk on it. He sought treatment on Tuesday. At that time, his leg hurt more than
his shoulder, so his shoulder was not mentioned. When he sought treatment a second time, he
reported shoulder pain. He stated that prior to the injury, he had full range of motion in the left
shoulder. He admitted to slipping on ice in 2008 and injuring his left shoulder.

        In a March 13, 2017, letter, Dr. Pierson stated that Mr. Scott injured his right thigh and left
shoulder at work. He had treated Mr. Scott prior to the compensable injury and an MRI was
performed which showed a partial thickness tear of the rotator cuff. He opined that the
compensable injury aggravated the shoulder pain and a second MRI showed a full thickness tear
of the rotator cuff. Dr. Pierson further opined that Mr. Scott sustained a discrete new injury as a
result of the compensable injury. Prior to the compensable injury, he was able to work but has been
unable to return since the compensable injury occurred.

        Dr. Mukkamala performed a second independent medical evaluation on May 12, 2017. He
reviewed the medical records and examined Mr. Scott. Dr. Mukkamala found that Mr. Scott
suffered a contusion to the right thigh as a result of the compensable injury. He concluded that he
had reached maximum medical improvement. Dr. Mukkamala opined that the left shoulder was
not injured in the work-related fall.

        The claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits on
September 29, 2017. On November 2, 2018, this Court affirmed a Board of Review decision, which
affirmed an Office of Judges’ Order affirming a claims administrator’s decision denying the
inclusion of left shoulder complete rotator cuff tear and strain of left arm muscle, fascia, and tendon
to the claim.

        The Office of Judges affirmed the September 29, 2017, claims administrator’s closure of
the claim for temporary total disability benefits on December 21, 2018. It found that the most
recent evidence submitted by Mr. Scott was a March 13, 2017, treatment note by Dr. Pierson. The
treatment note stated that Mr. Scott sustained a discrete new injury to his left shoulder on May 4,
                                                  3
2016, which prevented him from returning to work. The Office of Judges noted that in its
September 19, 2017, Order, it reviewed the March 13, 2017, treatment note and concluded that
Mr. Scott failed to show that he sustained a left shoulder injury as a result of his compensable May
4, 2016, fall. The Office of Judges concluded that he had reached maximum medical improvement
for the compensable injury and that he was not entitled to medical benefits for the left shoulder.
That Order was affirmed by the Board of Review and this Court. The Office of Judges, in the
instant case, therefore concluded that the claim was properly closed for temporary total disability
benefits. The Board of Review adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Office
of Judges and affirmed its Order on May 28, 2019.

        After review, we agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Office of Judges as
affirmed by the Board of Review. This Court previously held that the left shoulder condition was
not the result of the compensable injury. The evidence indicates Mr. Scott’s inability to return to
work is the result of a noncompensable condition. The claim was therefore properly closed for
temporary total disability benefits.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                                                         Affirmed.
ISSUED: July 31, 2020

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
Justice Evan H. Jenkins
Justice John A. Hutchison

                                                 4