Court Opinion

ID: 4896420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-02 23:58:35.711118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:45.740997
License: Public Domain

HENRY, Associate Justice.
— This suit was brought to enjoin the collection of State and county taxes on shares of national bank stock, on the ground that the assessment of the taxes was in violation of the Constitution of this State as well as of the act of Congress forbidding a higher rate of taxation of national bank stock than of other moneyed capital.
*561It appears from the evidence and the findings of fact by the court, that plaintiffs are the holders of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Brenham, which consists of one hundred thousand dollars, divided into shares of one hundred dollars each. The shares had an intrinsic as well as market value above one hundred dollars each.
The bank owned real estate which was assessed for taxes at the value of fifteen thousand dollars.
The shareholders insisted upon their right to have the shares assessed at sixty dollars each. They were assessed at their par value, less the value of the real estate, or at eighty-five dollars each.
The plaintiffs introduced in evidence the assessments of a few parties, among them of one private banking firm, and proved that the property in each case was assessed at about one-half of its true value. They contend that it was the custom of the assessor and the board of equalization of Washington County to list or assess property at a uniform valuation of about fifty per cent of its true value.
The court found that no such custom existed. This finding is assigned as error.
The evidence above referred to was all that was offered of the existence of such a custom.
The court correctly concluded that it was not established. Even if it had been established it could not have properly affected the result of this suit. It appears that appellant’s property was not assessed beyond its true value.
It is complained that our statutes that permit private banks to deduct the amount of their deposits from their taxable assets withhold that privilege from national banks, and thereby make a discrimination against the national banks.
By the Act of March 31, 1885, national banks are required to render their real estate for taxation, and at the same time to render a sworn statement showing the number and amount of the shares of said bank for the purpose of being assessed, “each share only for the difference between its actual cash value and the proportionate amount per share at which its real estate is assessed.”
The real estate of the corporation is intended to be taxed in its own name, and its personal property in the names of its shareholders. The law provides for it to be done through the agency of the officers of the corporation and the assessor.
The general deposits with a bank are debts against it. As was said by this court in the case of Rosenberg v. Weekes, 67 Texas, 584, “The value of a bank’s shares depends upon the value of its franchise, capital, and property of all kinds, less the amount of its debts.”
We find no error in the proceedings, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Delivered January 14, 1890.