Court Opinion

ID: 9797007
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 04:10:47.239701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:59.466901
License: Public Domain

L UMPKIN, Presiding Judge:
concur in result.
T 1 I concur in the Court's decision in this case. However, I cannot join in the dicta contained in Footnote 3. Under the proper fact situation a direct order to perform specific actions, given in open court and later disobeyed in open court, could be grounds for a finding said actions constitute direct contempt. The fails to acknowledge that both the order and the disobeying of that order occurred in open court. While the disobedience in open court could constitute direct contempt, I agree this record does not support that finding.