Court Opinion

ID: 9353156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-11 01:00:27.816717+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:53.364076
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-30113         Document: 00516605626             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/10/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                FILED
                                                                           January 10, 2023
                                       No. 22-30113
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar                             Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Demetrius Deangelo Hall,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Louisiana
                               USDC No. 5:19-CR-394-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Demetrius Deangelo Hall has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Hall has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
   developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hall’s claims of ineffective
   assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-30113        Document: 00516605626       Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/10/2023

                                   No. 22-30113

   prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841
   (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Hall’s response.      We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2