Court Opinion

ID: 9832744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:09:25.905577+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:51.461527
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Appellees’ motion for rehearing has been carefully considered, and we adhere to the view that under the decision in the case of Red River National Bank v. Ferguson et al. Mrs. Benjamin is not personally liable upon the notes sued upon, and that the personal judgment for the amount of such notes was improperly rendered against her.
The motion for rehearing is therefore overruled, but, in deference to the request of ap-pellee, additional facts are found as follows:
Mrs. Benjamin executed the notes sued upon, the same being ordinary promissory notes; her husband, H. W. Benjamin, signing the same pro forma. The notes were given in part payment for the land conveyed to Mrs. Benjamin by Harbour, the deed reciting that the entire consideration for the land was paid and secured to be paid by Mrs. Benjamin, to wit, $3,509 cash and the execution of the notes sued upon; the notes being described as of even date with the deed and executed by Abbie L. C. Benjamin, and the deed further reciting “the cash payment paid as aforesaid having been paid out of the separate funds of the grantee herein, and the said notes to be paid out of the separate funds and estate of the said Abbie L. C. Benjamin,” and that the land was conveyed to Mrs. Benjamin to her own separate estate and use.
Mrs. Youngblood, the plaintiff, testified:
“I am the legal owner and holder of about $9,750 of notes executed by Abbie L. O. Benjamin and her husband, H. W. Benjamin. I had the vendor’s lien notes on that land at the time it was sold. I had sold the land to Well-born, and the notes that Wellborn gave me were taken up by the Harbour notes; then the Harbour notes were taken up by the Benjamin notes. I was here at the time the trade was made between Harbour and Benjamin. I was conversant with the status of affairs, the facts of that trade.
“Mrs. Benjamin purchased this land. The question of whether Mr. Benjamin or Mrs. Benjamin was responsible was discussed, and Mrs. Benjamin signed the notes first, and that she was to pay them. She had an income sufficient to meet those notes as they became due, and Mr. Benjamin, I didn’t, of course, look to him for it at all, but I did to Mrs. Benjamin, as she was there, and she signed the notes first and then he signed them. I had a conversation with Mrs. Benjamin in reference to this being her separate property, and she was going to pay for it. We talked it over. She was here, and she had this income every year from some property at Houston, and that she would — she had something like $5,000 every six months, and had something to pay the notes off as they came due. She could pay the notes out of annuities that she received from the estate. That was the understanding at the time the deal wjas made, and why I agreed to accept their notes in place of the original Harbour notes.
Cross-examination: “I would not have taken the notes if I had not believed they were to be paid out of her separate estate.”
The testimony aforesaid, of Mrs. Young-blood, was not controverted.