Court Opinion

ID: 9665625
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:53:19.046201+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:17.140266
License: Public Domain

Kelly, J.
(dissenting). I am in agreement with the opinion of the Court of Appeals that concludes:
“The learned trial judge properly determined the matter. Judgment affirmed, no costs, the construction of a statute being involved.”
Reasons for my dissent to a holding that the trial court and the Court of Appeals should be reversed *605because they applied a section of the act* that was unconstitutional are set forth in my dissent in Fox v. Employment Security Commission, 379 Mich 579.
Dethmebs, C. J., concurred with Kelly, J.

 CL 1948, § 421.27n, as added by PA 1963, No 188 (Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 17.529 [1]).