Court Opinion

ID: 7368537
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-27 23:54:04.356674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:50.422448
License: Public Domain

THOMAS, J.
(1, 2) The cause is submitted on motion to strike bill of exceptions, because not presented to the trial judge within the time required by law. When a statute fixes a time within which an act may be done, the first day must be excluded and the last day included, to compute it. — Code 1907, § 11; Oberhaus v. State, ex rel. McNamara, 173 Ala. 483, 55 South. 898. Bills of exceptions may be presented at any time “within ninety days from the date on which judgment is entered and not afterwards.” — Code 1907, § 3019. The use of the word “within,” as a limit of time, or degree, or space, embraces the last day, or degree, or entire distance, covered by the limit fixed.—Hamilton v. State, 101 Tenn. 417, 47 S. W. 695.
(.3) The judgment in this case was entered on May 19, 1915, and the bill of exceptions was presented on the 19th day of August, 1915, 92 days after the entry of the judgment. The motion to strike the bill of exceptions is granted, and the bill of exceptions is stricken. There being nothing before the court for review, the cause is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Anderson, C. J., and Mayfield and Somerville, JJ., concur.