Court Opinion

ID: 2963742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:14:35.214298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:50.214524
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

        December 6, 1995        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                           

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1574 

                                  A.G. EDWARDS, JR.,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                                PHYLLIS VELIS, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                      [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
                                           ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Stahl and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            A.G. Edwards, Jr. on brief pro se.
            _________________
            Rhonda T.  Maloney and  Esdaile, Barrett  & Esdaile  on brief  for
            __________________      ___________________________
        appellees Phyllis Velis, Nicole Velis and Christopher Velis.
            Richard  K.  Donahue, Jr.  and  Donahue  &  Donahue  on brief  for
            _________________________       ___________________
        appellee Harvey I. Katzen, M.D.
            William D. Crowe and Crowe & Dunn on  brief for appellee Harold M.
            ________________     ____________
        Goldstein.
            George A. Berman,  Deirdre M. Giblin  and Posternak,  Blankstein &
            ________________   _________________      ________________________
        Lund on brief for appellees Frederic A. Swartz and Swartz & Swartz.
        ____

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  After carefully considering the briefs
                      __________

            of  the  parties and  reviewing  the  record,  we affirm  the

            judgment of  the district  court for essentially  the reasons

            stated in its Memorandum & Order, dated April 13, 1995.

                      Affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                      ________   ___

                                         -2-