Court Opinion

ID: 9881569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-03 14:00:36.779779+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:17.574370
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12728   Document: 6-1      Date Filed: 10/03/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-12728
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      ERIC NORDQUIST,
                                                   Petitioner-Appellant,
      versus
      FL ST HOSPITAL,

                                                 Respondent-Appellee.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 3:23-cv-21271-TKW-HTC
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12728      Document: 6-1       Date Filed: 10/03/2023      Page: 2 of 2

      2                       Opinion of the Court                   23-12728

      Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Eric Nordquist appeals from the magistrate judge’s August 8,
      2023 order closing the habeas proceeding and terminating the mo-
      tion to proceed in forma pauperis. However, we lack jurisdiction to
      directly review a magistrate judge’s order, and an appeal from such
      an order must be taken to the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291;
      Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066–67 (11th Cir.
      1982) (explaining that magistrate judge orders issued pursuant to
      28 U.S.C. § 636(b) are not ﬁnal and may not be appealed until ren-
      dered ﬁnal by a district court); United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353,
      1359 (11th Cir. 2009) (noting that appellate courts are without ju-
      risdiction to hear appeals directly from magistrate judges).
             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
      hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
      requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.