Court Opinion

ID: 1015745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:38:01.179879+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:24.724400
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 04-7853

DANIEL RICHARD FORD, III,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department
of Corrections,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1623-1)

Submitted:   March 9, 2005                 Decided:   March 24, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Lynn Hartung, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Donald
Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Daniel Richard Ford, III seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000).    We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Ford has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

See Ford v. Johnson, No. CA-02-1623-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2004).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                              - 2 -