Court Opinion

ID: 9717307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:01:17.953607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:52.426926
License: Public Domain

SHIELDS, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in result in part.
I concur in part and concur in result in part.
I concur with the majority’s resolution of Cowser’s claim that the trial court erred in determining the amount of attorney fees to which it was entitled.
On the issue of the award of damages for waterproofing of the concrete walls. I concur in result. I agree with the majority opinion only to the extent that it holds that the trial court implicitly found that the waterproofing was required as a result of Cowser’s defective workmanship and that there is evidence in the record which supports that finding.
On the issue of prejudgment interest I also concur in result; I agree with the majority opinion to the extent it holds that the court’s determination of the amount of prejudgment interest is not erroneous for the reasons argued by Cowser.