Court Opinion

ID: 988270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:50:24.324332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:24.571443
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7459

STANLEY EUGENE WOODS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;        SOUTH   CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-94-3283-3-3BC)

Submitted:   January 11, 1996             Decided:   January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Eugene Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones,
BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina; Donald John Zelenka,
Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. South
Carolina, No. CA-94-3283-3-3BC (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2