Court Opinion

ID: 9647739
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 13:48:49.619071+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:52.676162
License: Public Domain

*336DONNELLY, Judge,
concurring'in result.
In State v. Brown, 549 S.W.2d 336 (Mo. banc 1977), decided concurrently herewith, I protested the adoption of the Cardillo rule. I would not apply it in this case primarily because it violates the dictates of Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 956 (1968).
I concur in the result reached in this case only because I can find no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice under Rule 27.20(c). See United States v. Qualls, 500 F.2d 1238 (8 Cir. 1974).