Court Opinion

ID: 9382280
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-25 21:00:33.995811+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:38.232957
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1085      Doc: 10         Filed: 03/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1085

        In re: JOHN DOE,

                            Petitioner.

                        On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-M-1)

        Submitted: March 21, 2023                                         Decided: March 24, 2023

        Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1085      Doc: 10          Filed: 03/24/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly

        delayed in ruling on his motions for relief under the First Step Act. He seeks an order from

        this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay

        in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant Doe leave to proceed by pseudonym, we

        deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                PETITION DENIED

                                                      2