Court Opinion

ID: 4699277
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-28 22:00:31.488917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:01.849216
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10215      Document: 00515916425         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/28/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                          June 28, 2021
                                  No. 20-10215                           Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Martin Viveros,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:18-CR-426-10

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Martin Viveros has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Viveros has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10215     Document: 00515916425         Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/28/2021

                                  No. 20-10215

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2