Court Opinion

ID: 9672185
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:50:26.760538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:14.809431
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing.
MORRIS, Commissioner.
The appellant filed a petition for a rehearing. A study of its contents discloses that the arguments presented pertain to questions which have been thoroughly considered by the court or that are without controlling effect on the decision of the case. A rehearing is denied.
In addition to asking for a rehearing, the petition contains the following request:
“If at the final conclusion of this litigation it is determined that the appellant must terminate its acceptance of demand deposits' accounts, we request the court to grant a reasonable time for it to divest itself of these accounts during which time the enforcement of any injunction will be stayed.”'
It appears to the court that it is compatible with justice and the public interest that the appellant be afforded a reasonable time to adjust its affairs to comply with the judgment. The enforcement of the injunction provided for in the judgment is hereby stayed for sixty days from' the date of the remittitur of the Supreme-Court, with leave to the appellant to make application to the District Court within that period, upon a proper showing and' notice to respondents, for an extension of the stay for such additional time as that court may deem reasonable.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion on petition for rehearing by the Honorable James Morris, a. retired judge and duly appointed and qualified Commissioner of the Supreme Court,. js adopted and made the opinion and decision of the court.
BURKE, C. J., and TEIGEN, STRUTZ and ERICKSTAD, JJ., concur.