Court Opinion

ID: 7468181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:38:35.638742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:51.579696
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby
Discharged.
It is so ordered.
*177ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, DE-KLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.