Court Opinion

ID: 4710200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-10 13:26:07.711935+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:07:02.059474
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                   San Antonio, Texas
                                          August 6, 2021

                                       No. 04-20-00388-CV

                         Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith,
                                         Appellants

                                                 v.

                          Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts,
                                         Appellees

                       From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 18935C
                           Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding

                                          ORDER

Sitting:       Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
               Irene Rios, Justice
               Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

        On July 1, 2020, the trial court signed an order denying appellants’ motion for partial
summary judgment and granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court’s July
1, 2020 order also ordered the Kerr County Clerk to pay earnest money funds from the court
registry to appellee and ordered the parties to pay their own attorney’s fees and expenses. On
July 30, 2020, appellants filed their notice of appeal.
        After the parties filed their briefs in this court, we set the appeal for submission on March
3, 2021. On June 28, 2021, we issued a show cause order. We questioned whether the challenged
order was a final order because it did not appear to dispose of all the causes of action in the case.
Specifically, it appeared that the parties’ claims regarding the payment of closing costs due to
third parties and appellants’ statutory fraud claim had not been resolved by the trial court. We
ordered appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
        On July 16, 2021, appellants filed a response to our show cause order. Among other
things, appellants argue the challenged order disposed of all pending claims and is a final,
appealable order. Appellants argue that the challenged order “necessarily precludes the
[a]ppellants’ claims related to fraud” and that “the disposition of the [e]arnest [m]oney funds” to
appellee and “not third parties” “would not necessarily mean that the issue was not resolved.”
        Because the parties have treated the challenged order as a final, appealable order and the
order’s intent with respect to finality is unclear, we (1) withdraw the March 3, 2021 submission
date, (2) abate this appeal, and (3) remand the case to the trial court for clarification.
        We ORDER the trial court, on or before September 3, 2021, to make findings and issue
an order clarifying whether it intended its July 1, 2020 order to be a final order disposing of all
pending claims. If the trial court determines its July 1, 2020 order was not intended to be a final
order disposing of all pending claims, then the parties may obtain a severance order or a nonsuit
order to make the July 1, 2020 order a final and appealable judgment. See Bella Palma, LLC v.
Young, 601 S.W.3d 799, 801 (Tex. 2020); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191,
206 (Tex. 2001) (“If the appellate court is uncertain about the intent of the order, it can abate the
appeal to permit clarification by the trial court.”).
        We FURTHER ORDER the trial court clerk, the Kerr County Clerk, to file on or before
September 17, 2021, a supplemental record containing any pleadings, orders, or judgments
related to this order.

       It is so ORDERED on August 6, 2021.

                                                                          PER CURIAM

       ATTESTED TO: _____________________________
                    MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court