Court Opinion

ID: 9906294
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-01 17:07:41.61811+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:13.780471
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                 IN THE OFFICE OF THE
                                                             CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
                                                                   DECEMBER 1, 2023
                                                               STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                   IN THE SUPREME COURT
                   STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                                 2023 ND 229

In the Matter of the Application for
Disciplinary Action Against Kristin A.
Overboe, a person admitted to the Bar of
the State of North Dakota
      ----------
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court
of the State of North Dakota,                                     Petitioner
      v.
Kristin A. Overboe,                                             Respondent

                                 No. 20230352

Application for disciplinary action.

TRANSFER TO INCAPACITY TO PRACTICE LAW STATUS

Per Curiam.

[¶1] The Supreme Court has before it a report from a hearing panel of the
disciplinary board recommending Kristin A. Overboe be transferred to
incapacitated status under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 5.1(C). We adopt the
hearing panel’s findings and order Overboe be transferred to incapacitated
status.

[¶2] Overboe was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on September 24,
2010. Overboe’s license was suspended on August 17, 2023, for six months and
one day for violating N.D.R.Prof. Conduct Rule 1.1, Rule 1.2, Rule 1.4, Rule

                                         1
1.16, and Rule 3.4. See Disciplinary Bd. v. Overboe, 2023 ND 160. Overboe
practiced law at Overboe Law in Fargo, North Dakota.

[¶3] Overboe failed to answer the petition and Disciplinary Counsel moved
for default. Overboe is in default and the charges in the petition for incapacity
are deemed admitted under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 3.1(E)(2).

[¶4] On October 10, 2023, the hearing panel filed findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and recommendations for discipline.

[¶5] The hearing panel concluded Overboe’s conduct demonstrates the
presence of a mental condition that adversely affects her ability to practice law.

[¶6] In November of 2022, Overboe interacted with the Clerk of the North
Dakota Supreme Court in the form of electronic communications from Overboe
to the Clerk’s personal cell phone. The Clerk had not previously provided
Overboe her personal phone number, nor did they have a personal relationship
prior to or since these interactions. The Clerk felt the communications were
unprofessional and inappropriate, and when Overboe was confronted, Overboe
admitted she was intoxicated when she sent the communications.

[¶7] Overboe had a second interaction with the Clerk similar to the first, ten
days later. Overboe again admitted to being intoxicated and expressed
problems with her mental clarity. A short time later, Overboe interacted with
the Clerk in an odd and unprofessional manner.

[¶8] The hearing panel concluded Overboe’s communications and attitude
demonstrated a likely substance abuse disorder, coupled with an underlying
mental illness, rendered Overboe unable to competently serve her clients and
presented a danger to the public and profession.

[¶9] Shortly after Overboe’s interactions with the Clerk, Overboe submitted
filings in her personal divorce that she had “been seeing and hearing things
that could be considered delusional. I have been told that I am delusional. I
have been diagnosed with PTSD according to my therapist…My mental illness
has made it difficult for me to do basic math.” Additionally, Overboe advanced

                                        2
rumors and allegations of inappropriate relationships between members of the
North Dakota State Bar and inappropriate relationships between her husband
and his attorneys.

[¶10] The hearing panel concluded Overboe’s actions demonstrate the
presence of a mental condition, which adversely affects her ability to practice
law; Overboe is incapacitated as contemplated by N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. Rule
5.1(C); and Overboe needs to be transferred to incapacitated status in order to
protect the public and the profession.

[¶11] On October 13, 2023, this matter was referred to this Court under N.D.R.
Lawyer Discipl. 3.1(F)(2). The hearing panel’s report was served on the Clerk
of the Supreme Court and disciplinary counsel on October 10 2023, and
forwarded to the Supreme Court. Objections were due within 20 days of service
of the report. No objections were received, and the matter was submitted to the
Court for consideration. The Court considered the matter, and

[¶12] IT IS ORDERED that as outlined above, the findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and recommendations by the hearing panel are accepted.

[¶13] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kristin A. Overboe is placed on
incapacity inactive status under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 5.1(C) until further
order of the Court.

[¶14] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Disciplinary Counsel promptly apply
to the district court for a professional trustee as provided in N.D.R. Lawyer
Discipl. 6.4.

[¶15] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Overboe comply with N.D.R. Lawyer
Discipl. 6.3 regarding notice.

[¶16] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
      Daniel J. Crothers
      Lisa Fair McEvers
      Jerod E. Tufte
      Douglas A. Bahr

                                      3