Court Opinion

ID: 9352887
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-10 13:08:17.48634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:40.044340
License: Public Domain

FILE COPY

                                Fourth Court of Appeals
                                        San Antonio, Texas
                                                January 5, 2023

                                            No. 04-22-00818-CR

                                          IN RE Jason S. TYLER

                                      Original Mandamus Proceeding1

                                                ORDER

Sitting:         Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                 Beth Watkins, Justice

        On December 7, 2022, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because
relator is represented by trial counsel below, his pro se mandamus petition presented nothing for
this court to review. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also
Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on December 14, 2022.

        On December 29, 2022, relator filed a pro se motion for rehearing requesting this court
reconsider the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus.2 After consideration, relator’s motion
for rehearing is DENIED.

           It is so ORDERED on January 5, 2023.
                                                                               PER CURIAM

           ATTESTED TO:__________________________
                       MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
                       CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 683655 and 683656, styled State of Texas v. Jason S. Tyler, pending in
the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Velia J. Meza presiding.
2 Relator’s filing is titled “Motion to Reverse Opinion of Denied Writ of Mandamus by Appeals Justices and

Requests Investigation of Proceedings.” We construe relator’s filing as a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P.
49.1.