Court Opinion

ID: 4129295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:50:11.568525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:23.121444
License: Public Domain

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . STATE OF TEXAS

   JOHN CORNYN

                                             June $2001

The Honorable John Smithee                            Opinion No. JC-0386
Chair, Insurance Committee
Texas House of Representatives                        Re: Collection of payments assessed by a public
P.O. Box 2910                                         improvement district (RQ-0336-JC)
Austin, Texas 7876829 10

Dear Representative   Smithee:

        You inquire about the procedures for collecting delinquent special assessments under the
Public Improvement District Assessment Act (“the Act”), chapter 372, subchapter A of the Local
Government Code, in particular, whether a homestead may be subjected to forced sale for
nonpayment of such assessments. Special assessments under Local Government Code chapter 372
may be collected by the governing body from property owners according to the procedures
applicable to collecting an ad valorem tax on real property, with the exception of procedures
applicable to the forced sale of homestead property to collect ad valorem taxes. Assessments are not
“taxes” as that term is used in the Texas Constitution, and a homestead may not be subjected to
forced sale for nonpayment of a public improvement district assessment under the “taxes due
thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution. Likewise, a homestead may
not be subjected to forced sale for nonpayment of a public improvement district assessment under
the “improvement thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50, unless the owner of the homestead
property signs a written contract with the supplier of materials and labor for an improvement on his
homestead property.

         A municipality may exercise the authority granted by chapter 372, subchapter A if it initiates
or receives a petition requesting the establishment of a public improvement district. See TEX. LOC.
GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 372.002 (Vernon 1999); see also id. 9 372.005 (petition requirements).            The
municipality may then “undertake an improvement project that confers a special benefit on a
definable part of the municipality     or the municipality’s extraterritorial jurisdiction,” such as
landscaping, building fountains, establishing parks, or acquiring, constructing or improving libraries,
pedestrian malls, sidewalks, streets, roadways, or off-street parking facilities. Id. 8 372.003. The
municipality establishes a public improvement district (“district”), providing for payment of at least
ten percent of the cost of an improvement by special assessments against property in the district. See
id. §§ 372.010, .014(a); see also id. 8 372.014(b) (payment of assessments against exempt public
property in the district). The cost of an improvement to be assessed against property in a district
must be apportioned on the basis of special benefits accruing to the property because of the
improvement.     See id. 8 372.015. The city may also issue short term or long term debt to fund
The Honorable John Smithee         - Page 2           (JC-0386)

improvements in the district and may require the assessments to be the source of debt payment.             See
id. $0 372.023-.026.

         If a land owner in the district does not pay the assessment, the following procedures          apply
to collecting it:

                          (b) An assessment or reassessment, with interest, the expense
                 of collection, and reasonable attorney’s fees, if incurred, is a first and
                 prior lien against the property assessed, superior to all other liens and
                 claims except liens or claims for state, county, school district, or
                 municipality ad valorem taxes, and is a personal liability of and
                 charge against the owners of the property regardless of whether the
                 owners are named.        The lien is effective from the date of the
                 ordinance levying the assessment until the assessment is paid and
                 may be enforced by the governing body in the same manner that an
                 ad valorem tax lien against real property may be enforced by the
                 governing body. . . .

Id. fj 372.018(b); see also id. 8 372.018(a) (interest on unpaid assessment). The property owner is
personally liable for the “assessment or reassessment, with interest, the expense of collection, and
reasonable attorney’s fees, if incurred,” and there is a lien against the property assessed for these
amounts, enforceable “by the governing body in the same manner that an ad valorem tax lien against
real property may be enforced by the governing body.” Id. tj 372.018(b).

         You first ask whether the phrase “in the same manner that an ad valorem tax lien against real
property” means that an official seeking to collect a delinquent assessment acts properly by using
the same form notices, time lines, procedures, and the like, that are used for the collection of
delinquent taxes. * The quoted phrase refers to enforcing the lien against the assessed property, not
against the property owner’s personal liability. Thus, we answer your question only in terms of
collecting delinquent assessments through enforcing the lien.

         “Manner” has been defined as “[tlhe way in which something is done or takes place; method
of action; mode of procedure.” IX OXFORDENGLISHDICTIONARY 324 (2d ed. 1989). Thus, a
governing body may enforce the lien for an assessment “with interest, the expense of collection, and
reasonable attorney’s fees, if incurred” by using the procedures applicable to enforcement of an ad
valorem tax lien against real property. TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 9 372.018(b) (Vernon 1999).
Because your question is very general, we cannot provide a comprehensive list of the procedures
applicable to enforcing the assessment lien. We note that provisions for enforcing an ad valorem
tax lien are found in chapter 33 of the Tax Code. See, e.g.,TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 49 33.41 (suit to

        ‘See Letter from Honorable John Smithee, Chair, Insurance Committee, Texas House of Representatives, to
Honorable John Cornyn, Texas Attorney General, at 2 (Jan. 10, 2001) [hereinafter Request Letter].
The Honorable John Smithee     - Page 3          (JC-0386)

foreclose lien); .47 (tax records as evidence) (Vernon Supp. 2001). Any specific provision for
enforcing ad valorem tax liens must be examined to determine whether it is consistent with the
provisions of chapter 372 of the Local Government Code.

         Moreover, as your remaining questions indicate, constitutional considerations apply to
enforcing an assessment lien on homestead property. As our answers to your questions on the
constitutional homestead exemption will show, procedures for enforcing an ad valorem tax lien
against a homestead do not apply to an assessment lien against a homestead.

        Section 372.018(b) ofthe Local Government Code provides that an assessment under chapter
372, with interest, collection expenses, and attorney’s fees, “is a first and prior lien against the
property assessed, superior to all other liens and claims except liens or claims for state, county,
school district, or municipality ad valorem taxes.” TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 372.018(b)
(Vernon 1999) (emphasis added). Statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and they will be
construed to be consistent with the constitution if possible. See TEX. GOV’T CODEAN-N. 0 3 11.021
(Vernon 1998); see Brady v Fourteenth Court ofAppeals, 795 S.W.2d 712,715 (Tex. 1990). We
must construe section 372.018(b) consistently with the constitutional provision on homesteads.

        Article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution protects a homestead   from forced sale for
the payment of debts, with certain exceptions. The provision states in part:

                        (a) The homestead of a family, or of a single adult person,
               shall be, and is hereby protected from forced sale, for the payment of
               all debts except for:

                           (2) the taxes due thereon;

                           (5) work and material used in constructing new improve-
               ments thereon, if contracted for in writing, or work and material
               used to repair or renovate existing improvements thereon . . . .

TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 5 50. See also id. 0 51 (defining homestead).

        You ask whether a homestead may be subjected to forced sale for nonpayment of a public
improvement district assessment under the “taxes due thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50 of
the Texas Constitution. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2. Although assessments are imposed
under the taxing power and are taxes for some purposes, they are not “taxes” as that term is usually
The Honorable   John Smithee    - Page 4          (JC-0386)

employed in the Texas Constitution. See Taylor v. Boyd, 63 Tex. 533,542 (1885) (assessments are
not subject to the “equal and uniform” requirement in Texas Constitution article VIII, section 1); see
also Evans v. Whicker, 90 S.W.2d 554, 556 (Tex. 1936) (where no homestead question was
involved, liens for paving assessments were enforceable against property that was “‘free from all
liens and encumbrances, save and except taxes”’ (citation omitted)). The words “tax,” “taxes,” and
“taxation” in the Texas Constitution, used without a qualifying word, mean ad valorem tax, taxes,
or taxation. See Taylor, 63 Tex. at 541. Ad valorem taxes are annually collected for the ordinary
purposes of municipal government and are based on an estimation of the value of the entire taxable
property in a city, from which an estimate is made of the percent of taxation of this value that will
raise the sum necessary to meet the “current annual want.” Id. at 540. In contrast, assessments are
charges imposed for purposes that do not require that they be imposed annually, or with reference
to time. See id. They are not usually based upon a percentage of the value of the taxable property
of a city, but upon the real or supposed benefit resulting from the improvement of the property on
which the specific charge is laid. See id. at 540-41.

         The Texas Supreme Court has determined that a special assessment is not a “tax” within
article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution. See City of Wichita Falls v. Williams, 26 S.W.2d
910,915 (Tex. 1930); Higgins v. Bordages, 31 SW. 52’55 (Tex. 1895); seealso Evans, 90 S.W.2d
at 556. A homestead is not subject to forced sale to collect the assessments against it. See City of
Wichita Falls, 26 S.W.2d at 915, see also Evans, 90 S.W.2d at 556. A homestead may not be
subjected to forced sale for nonpayment of a public improvement district assessment under the
“taxes due thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution. See TEX. CONST.
art. XVI, 8 50 (a)(2).

         You also ask whether a homestead may be subjected to forced sale for nonpayment of a
public improvement district assessment under the “improvement thereon” claims of article XVI,
section 50. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2; TEX. CONST.art. XVI, 0 50(a)(5). You inquire
whether a city’s public adoption of the annual district assessment and service plan, combined with
a landowner’s written acknowledgment of the district when closing on the purchase of land, create
a contract in writing for “improvements thereon.” See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2.

        No provision of Local Government Code chapter 372 requires a landowner to make written
acknowledgment     of the district when closing on the purchase of land, but we will assume that this
acknowledgment     is made. Procedures for the city’s adoption of an assessment and service plan
are set out in chapter 372 of the Local Government Code. See TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN.
0 372.013(a) (V emon 1999) (preparation of service plan for review and approval by the municipal
governing body); see also id. 9 372.014(a) (assessment plan). The governing body of the
municipality prepares an assessment roll and must conduct a public hearing on it before it may levy
assessments on the property. See id. $3 372.015-.017.

         Article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution does not prevent the enforcement of a
contractors’ or mechanics’ lien against a homestead. The provision authorizing mechanics’ liens on
homestead property was amended in 1997 by approval of the ballot proposition that also authorized
The Honorable     John Smithee     - Page 5            (JC-0386)

home equity loans. 2 See generally Rooms With A View, Inc. v. Private Nat ‘IMortgage Ass ‘n, Inc.,
7 S.W.3d 840 (Tex. App.-Austin 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied by, Nat ‘1Ass ‘n of Remodeling
Indus. Inc. v. Rooms With A View, Inc. 121 S. Ct. 72 (2000) (upholding constitutionality            of
amendment to provisions of article XVI, section 50 on contractor’s and mechanics’ liens). Debts
for “work and material used in constructing new improvements thereon, if contracted for in writing”
are excepted from the prohibition against the forced sale of a homestead. See TEX.CONST.art. XVI,
8 50(a)(5). This language applies to new improvements on the homestead, while more stringent
requirements set out in subsections (a)(5)(A) through (D) of the constitutional provision apply to the
creation of a mechanics’ lien for debts for “work and material used to repair or renovate existing
improvements thereon.” TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 5 50(a)(5); see Spradlin v. Jim’Walter Homes, Inc.,
34 S.W.3d 578’580-81 (Tex. 2000).

         A mechanics’ lien may be created on a homestead only for debts for “work and material used
in constructing new improvements thereon.” TEX. CONST. art. XVI, $ 50(a)(5) (emphasis added).
Many of the public improvement projects expressly authorized by Local Government Code chapter
372 are unlikely to be improvements on the homestead property. This statute expressly identifies
a number of public improvement projects, such as establishing and improving parks, constructing
fountains, distinctive lighting and signs, acquiring and installing of pieces of art, acquiring,
constructing or improving libraries, pedestrian malls, sidewalks, streets, roadways and off-street
parking facilities, and acquiring, constructing, improving, or rerouting mass transportation facilities.
See TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODEANN. $372.003 (Vernon 1999). A homestead cannot possibly be liable
under the “improvements thereon” language of article XVI, section 50, for an assessment used to
improve property other than the homestead.

         There are public improvements, in particular, paving sidewalks and streets, that are made
upon homestead property. See Tex. Bitulithic Co. v. Warwick, 293 S.W. 160’162-64 (Tex. Comm’n
App. 1927, judgm’t adopted). The common-law rule assumes that a conveyance of land on a public
roadway conveys the fee to the center of the road, absent express language showing a contrary
intention. See id. In addressing your question, we will assume that some of the projects authorized
by Local Government Code chapter 372 include “work and material used in constructing new
improvements” on homestead property. See TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 8 50(a)(5).

        A construction or improvement lien on a homestead will be valid only if it is created in the
manner provided in article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution. See Moray Corp. v. Griggs,
713 S.W.2d 753, 754 (Tex. App.-Houston          [lst Dist.] 1986, writ ref d). The construction or
improvement lien attaches to a homestead for a debt for “work and material used in constructing new
improvements thereon, if contracted for in writing.” TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 8 50(a)(5) (emphasis
added); see also id. art. XVI, 9 37 (liens of mechanics, artisans, and material men on buildings for
value of labor done thereon or material furnished therefor). A mechanics’ lien attaches to property
when the mechanic performs labor upon the building “under direct contract with the owner.”

         *See Tex. H.J. Res. 3 1,75th Leg., R.S., 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 6739; see also Votes on Proposed Amendments
to the Texas Constitution, 1875November, 1997, 1999 Tex. Gen. Laws 25 (Election Result Table).
The Honorable John Smithee      - Page 6           (JC-0386)

Warner Mem ‘I Univ. v. Ritenour, 56 S.W.2d 236 (Tex. Civ. App.-Eastland               1933, writ ref d)
(discussing article XVI, section 37 of the Texas Constitution); see also Inman v. Orndorff, 596
S.W.2d 236,238 (Tex. Civ. App.-Houston        [lst Dist.] 1980, no writ) (a stranger to the title cannot
create a valid lien on land) (discussing article XVI, section 37 of the Texas Constitution).          An
assessment lien against homestead property cannot be created against a homestead by a statutory
process, but one may be created by contract signed by the homestead owner. See Glenn v.
Panhandle Constr. Co., 110 S.W.2d 1217, 1218 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo,           1937 no writ); White v
Dozier Constr. Co., 70 S.W.2d 240, 241 (Tex. Civ. App.-Austin           1934, no writ); see also Tex.
Bitulithic Co, 293 S.W. at 16 l-62 (contract between property owner and paving company created
lien for paving and improving the street in front of property). Thus, a written contract between the
property owner and the suppliers is essential for a lien for labor or materials used in constructing a
new improvement on the homestead to attach to the homestead.

         The governing body of the municipality, not the individual property owner, contracts for
improvements in a public improvement district established under Local Government Code chapter
372. If a district is established, the powers granted by subchapter A of chapter 372 “may be
exercised by a municipality.”      TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 372.002 (Vernon 1999). The
governing body of a municipality may “undertake an improvement project,” and must pay the costs
ofimprovements     from the various municipal funds available for that purpose. See id. $5 372.003(a),
.02 1, .023, .026. Accordingly, a homestead cannot be subjected to forced sale for nonpayment of
a public improvement district assessment under the “improvement thereon” clause of article XVI,
section 5 0.

        To be enforceable, a written contract for improvements on the homestead must also strictly
comply with the statute listing the requirements for fixing a lien on a homestead. See Moray Corp.,
713 S.W.2d at 754; see also Collier v. Valley Bldg. & Loan Ass ‘n, 62 S.W.2d 82, 84 (Tex. 1933).
An encumbrance may be fixed on homestead property for “work and material used in constructing
improvements on the property if contracted for in writing as provided by [Property Code] Sections
53.254 (a), (b), and (c).” TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. 9 41.001(b)(3) (Vernon 2000). Section 53.254
provides as follows:

                        (a) To fix a lien on a homestead, the person who is to furnish
                material or perform labor and the owner must execute a written
                contract setting forth the terms of the agreement.

                         (b) The contract must be executed     before the material    is
                furnished or the labor is performed.

                       (c) If the owner is married, the contract must be signed by
               both spouses.

Id. 0 53.254 (Vernon Supp. 2001).
The Honorable   John Smithee   - Page 7          (JC-0386)

        A city’s public adoption of the annual district assessment and service plan, combined with
a landowner’s written acknowledgment of the district when closing on the purchase of land, does
not constitute a written contract as required by article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution or
by Property Code section 53.254. Accordingly, the facts you present do not fix a lien for the value
of a special assessment on the homestead property benefitted by the assessment.
The Honorable   John Smithee    - Page 8         (JC-0386)

                                       SUMMARY

                         Local Government Code chapter 372 authorizes a city to levy
                special assessments on real property to aid in funding improvements
                in public improvement districts. The municipal governing body is
                authorized by statute to collect these assessments according to the
                procedures for collecting an ad valorem tax on real property, except
                for procedures applicable to the forced sale of homestead property to
                collect ad valorem taxes.

                        Assessments are not “taxes” as that term is used in the Texas
                Constitution, and a homestead may not be subjected to forced sale for
                nonpayment of a public improvement district assessment under the
                “taxes due thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50 of the Texas
                Constitution.

                         A homestead may not be subjected to forced sale for
                nonpayment of a public improvement district assessment under the
                “improvement thereon” clause of article XVI, section 50, absent a
                written, signed contract between the owner of the homestead property
                and the supplier of materials and labor for an improvement on the
                homestead property.

                                              Yqurs very truly,

                                              Attorney General of Texas

ANDY TAYLOR
First Assistant Attorney General

SUSAN D. GUSKY
Chair, Opinion Cornmittee

Susan L. Garrison
Assistant Attorney General - Opinion Committee