Court Opinion

ID: 9935772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:56:42.054033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:20.620807
License: Public Domain

I concur specially to point out what could be misinterpreted as a statement of the law contained in Judge Yates's dissent. This court's decision in Jackson v. Jackson, 656 So.2d 875
(Ala.Civ.App. 1995), does not set any legal precedent, and our supreme court's opinion in Ex parte Vaughn, 634 So.2d 533
(Ala. 1993), is presently the controlling law regarding military retirement benefits. § 12-3-16, Ala. Code 1975. See my dissent in Jackson, supra.