Court Opinion

ID: 8675981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:04:52.943736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.981896
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kyle Delano Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:14-cv-00058-HEH-MHL (E.D.Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *256this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.