Court Opinion

ID: 5785727
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:58:34.291153+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:05.994724
License: Public Domain

In four related abuse and neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding of the Family *1008Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered July 10, 2008, as, after a fact-finding hearing, found that she had neglected the children Carmen C. and Ida.R, and derivatively neglected the children Juan R. and Miguel R.
Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner alleged that the mother of the subject children left the children unsupervised with their grandfather, knowing that the grandfather had a propensity for sexually abusing children, as he had sexually abused the mother when she was a child. As a result, Carmen C. and Ida R. were abused by their grandfather. Thus, the mother failed to provide proper supervision and guardianship, which resulted in actual harm to the children, Carmen C. and Ida R. (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Brice L., 29 AD3d 910 [2006]).
Based upon our review of the record, and deferring to the Family Court’s resolution of credibility- issues (see Matter of Candace S., 38 AD3d 786, 787 [2007]), we conclude that the Family Court’s determination that the mother neglected Carmen C. and Ida R. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Mia P., 63 AD3d 1160 [2009]). Proof of the mother’s neglect of Carmen C. and Ida R. was sufficient to establish that she derivatively neglected the children’s siblings, Juan R. and Miguel R. (see Matter of Tristan R., 63 AD3d 1075, 1076 [2009]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Hall, JJ., concur.