Court Opinion

ID: 4089287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-13 15:01:33.524812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:08.430474
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

     IN RE: DATATREASURY CORPORATION,
                     Appellant
              ______________________

                      2016-1250
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/012,537.
                  ______________________

               Decided: October 13, 2016
                ______________________

    DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP,
Daingerfield, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented
by CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX.

    WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by
THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE.
                 ______________________

  Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
    We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in
DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No.
16-1046.
2                        IN RE: DATATREASURY CORPORATION

    Appellant DataTreasury Corp. also moved for costs
under Rule 30, arguing the Director should reimburse
DataTreasury for printing costs relating to unnecessary
pages included in the Joint Appendix. Docket No. 32. We
deny the motion, but we caution the Director to carefully
evaluate which material it elects to cite in the Joint
Appendix and only include material relevant to the issues
disputed in a particular appeal.