Court Opinion

ID: 9510249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 21:54:11.189892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:58.661053
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE TRIEWEILER
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶44 I concur with the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment of the District Court; however, I disagree with majority’s reasons for doing so. Specifically, I concur with the opinion of Justice Leaphart that the contract is at least ambiguous with regard to the date on which the contract commenced. However, I disagree with the majority’s disposition of Issue 2. Doble concedes there was no agreement to extend the term of the contract, and nothing allegedly said by the defendant or his attorney effectively modified the contract so as to extend its date of expiration.
JUSTICE NELSON joins in the foregoing dissenting opinion.