Court Opinion

ID: 9559899
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:37:41.579025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:50.380933
License: Public Domain

JOHNSON, Justice,
concurring, concurring in the result, and dissenting.
I concur with the portion of the Court’s opinion concerning MIGA’s claims.
I concur in the result of the portion of the Court’s opinion concerning the consent-to-settle provision of Mutual’s policy. In reaching the result on this issue, I would not rely on what the majority of out-of-state courts have done, but rather on the rationale stated by our Court. In my view, while the decisions of other courts on is*788sues presented to this Court may suggest a rationale for our decision, we should never embrace a rule merely because other states have done so.
I dissent from the portion of the Court’s opinion concerning the adequacy of the notice of claim. In my view, the notice was not adequate.