Court Opinion

ID: 4471491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-10 17:01:40.56374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:05.921138
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                 Filed: November 19, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
RAFAEL D. LEAL,             *                          No. 17-1513V
                            *
          Petitioner,       *                          Special Master Sanders
                            *
 v.                         *
                            *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH         *                          Stipulation; Dismissal; Influenza (“Flu”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES,         *                          Vaccine; Tetanus, Diphtheria, and
                            *                          Pertussis (“Tdap”) Vaccine; SIRVA
          Respondent.       *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                          ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

        On October 13, 2017, Rafael D. Leal (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34
(2012). Petitioner received a flu vaccination in his left arm and a Tdap vaccination in his right
arm on February 29, 2016. Pet’r’s Ex. 4 at 4, ECF No. 22. Petitioner alleged that he developed a
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) in his left arm caused by the flu
vaccine and in his right arm caused by the Tdap vaccine. See Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1. Petitioner
further alleged that he experienced the residual effects of his injury for more than six months. Id.

        On November 1, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation in which they state that this action
should be dismissed. Stip. at 2. Prior to filing the stipulation, Petitioner notified his counsel that
he wished to withdraw from the Program and that he does not wish to pursue a separate legal
action. Id. The parties then agreed to dismiss this action pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). Id.

         Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed

1
  This decision shall be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913
(codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). This means the Decision will be
available to anyone with access to the Internet. As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party
has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that
is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2)
that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the
instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                    s/Herbrina D. Sanders
                                                    Herbrina D. Sanders
                                                    Special Master

                                               2