Court Opinion

ID: 2286906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:59:17.451943+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:01.074901
License: Public Domain

323 S.W.3d 43 (2010)
Lamarc GARRETT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93696.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
August 31, 2010.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 7, 2010.
Gwenda Robinson, MO Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun Mackelprang, John Reeves, Co-Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and NANNETTE A BAKER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lamarc Garrett ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment ("Judgment") denying his Rule 24.035[1] Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment and Sentence ("PCR Motion") without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2008), unless otherwise indicated.