Court Opinion

ID: 3129198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 16:17:18.24436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:31.121921
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued February 28, 2011.

In The
Court of
Appeals
For The
First District
of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-11-00159-CV
———————————
IN RE Garland d. Anderson, M.D., Randal J. Urban, M.D., Billy U.
Philips, Ph.D., Vicente a. RESTO, M.D., HENRY F. EPSTEIN, M.D., DAVID H.
WALKER, M.D., COURTNEY M. tOWNSEND, JR., M.D., AND ROBERT M. HIRSCHFELD, M.D., Relators

 

 
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

 

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
          By
petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Garland D. Anderson, M.D., Randal J.
Urban, M.D., Billy U. Phillips, Ph.D., Vicente A. Resto, M.D., Henry F.
Epstein, M.D., David H. Walker, M.D., Courtney M. Townsend, Jr., M.D., and
Robert M. Hirschfeld, M.D., challenge the trial court’s February 23, 2011 order
granting real parties in interest’s motion to compel the deposition of Dr.
Garland D. Anderson and denying relators’ motion for entry of a protective
order.  
We deny the petition for
writ of mandamus.  Relators’ motion for
emergency stay is dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
 
Panel
consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Alcala and Bland.
 

[1]
          The underlying case is Bessman et al. v. Anderson et al., No.
10-CV-4210 in the 212th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the
Honorable Susan Criss presiding.