Court Opinion

ID: 594045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:22.690939
License: Public Domain

978 F.2d 1255
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Andrew James JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.William Donald SCHAEFER, Governor, State of Maryland;Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary, Department of Public Safety;Joseph Henneberry, Director, Patuxent Institution;  HowardSmith, Classification Counselor, Patuxent Institution,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6859.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  October 26, 1992Decided:  November 12, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge.  (CA-91-903)
Andrew James Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of The Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Andrew James Jordan appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Jordan v. Schaefer, No. CA-91-903 (D. Md. July 22, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED