Court Opinion

ID: 4675457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-08 00:00:18.712228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:41.594076
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-50575      Document: 00515812266         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/07/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                  No. 20-50575                             April 7, 2021
                               Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Pedro Contreras,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:19-CR-251-1

   Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Contreras has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Contreras has responded. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50575    Document: 00515812266          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/07/2021

                                  No. 20-50575

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Contreras’s
   responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2