Court Opinion

ID: 9916737
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-10 16:02:55.998884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:56.458716
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                       Opinion filed January 10, 2024.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-1160
                       Lower Tribunal No. 18-31604
                          ________________

                         Bernardo de la Peña,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

            SC Mota Associates Limited Partnership,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de
Jesus Santovenia, Judge.

      Ayala Law, P.A., and Eduardo A. Maura and Luis F. Quesada, for
appellant.

     Slusher & Rosenblum, P.A., and Jonathan S. Glickman and Jeremy E.
Slusher (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See La Ley Sports Complex at City of Homestead, LLC v.

City of Homestead, 255 So. 3d 468, 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“In reviewing

a final judgment rendered from a non-jury trial, the trial court's findings of fact

are clothed with a presumption of correctness. Fito v. Attorney's Title Ins.

Fund, Inc., 83 So. 3d 755, 757-58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). We apply a clear error

standard to the findings of fact, and a finding will not be disturbed unless it is

totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, it is clearly

against the weight of the evidence, or it was induced by an erroneous view

of the law. Id.; Holland v. Gross, 89 So. 2d 255, 258 (Fla. 1956).”)

                                        2