Court Opinion

ID: 3086910
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:59:54.48848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:54.026997
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-13-00494-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ANTHONY R. FREEMAN,
TDCJ NO. 297125,                                                          Appellant,

                                          v.

CAROL E. MONROE, WARDEN,                            Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 36th District Court
                     of Bee County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria
                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
      The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on November 6, 2013. On

December 2, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of
receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not

significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                  PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
30th day of January, 2014.

                                             2