Court Opinion

ID: 4120577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-27 22:48:27.592864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:50:39.938765
License: Public Domain

Presidential Authority as Commander in
                           Chief of the Air Force
The President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States—the Air Force as
  well as the Army and the Navy.

                                                                                August 26, 1947

           MEMORANDUM FOR THE SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT*

    The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in
Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military
Establishment by the National Security Act of 1947, Pub. L. No. 80-253, § 208, 61
Stat. 495, 503.
    The Constitution provides: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the
Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when
called into the actual Service of the United States . . . .” U.S. Const. art. I, § 2,
cl. 1.
    It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of
the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air
Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as
Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander
charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The
phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all
the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces
is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted,
and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed
forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as
Commander in Chief of all the armed forces.
    This conclusion is supported by other parts of the Constitution. Thus the Con-
stitution speaks of the power of the Congress “to raise and support Armies,” art. I,
§ 8, cl. 12, “to provide and maintain a Navy,” id. cl. 13, and “to make rules for the
Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,” id. cl. 14. In so
providing, the Constitution, of course, does not use the words “Air Force.” It
certainly could not be contended that the absence of those words from the
Constitution rendered the Congress unable to provide for an Air Force.

                                                    HAROLD I. BAYNTON
                                             Acting Assistant to the Attorney General

    *
      Editor’s Note: The copy of this memorandum in the OLC daybook is addressed to “Mr. Clark
Clifford,” without indication of his position. It appears that Mr. Clifford was serving as Special
Counsel to President Truman in 1947. See Jeremy Rabkin, At the President’s Side: The Role of the
White House Counsel in Constitutional Policy, 56 Law & Contemp. Probs. 63, 66 (1993).

                                              463