Court Opinion

ID: 9778165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 20:34:23.973403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:04.233366
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
After reviewing Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and accompanying brief, we have determined that our opinion, as previously issued, correctly states the applicable law concerning appellant’s first point of error. However, the Warrens also complain that costs were improperly taxed against them under Rule 435, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The judgment against the Warrens was reduced approximately 6 percent. Accordingly, costs are to be taxed 94 percent to the Warrens and 6 percent to appel-lee Denison. To this extent, appellant’s second point of error is sustained; otherwise, it is overruled. Except to this extent, we adhere to our former disposition of the case and Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is overruled.