Court Opinion

ID: 9736322
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 18:52:08.209586+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:27:05.896802
License: Public Domain

VALLÉE, Acting P. J., Concurring.
I agree with the majority of the court that a peremptory writ of mandate should issue compelling the respondent court to dismiss the action. It is my opinion, however, that when petitioner, upon being booked after his arrest, posted and was released on bail, he was brought within the jurisdiction of the court within the meaning of section 1382, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code and that the 30-day period fixed by the statute commenced to run at the time he was admitted to bail.
A petition for a rehearing was denied July 18, 1961, and the petition of the real party in interest for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 23, 1961.