Court Opinion

ID: 43502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 21:57:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:06.686807
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                                                    F I L E D
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                       July 6, 2006

                         _______________________                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                         Clerk
                               No. 04-41551
                             Summary Calendar
                         _______________________

                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

                         LORENA MARICELA TORRES,

                                                     Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     Docket No. 5:04-CR-948-3
_________________________________________________________________

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

            The   attorney   appointed    to   represent   Lorena    Maricela

Torres has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S. Ct. 1396 (1967).      Torres has not filed a response.

            Our independent review of the brief and the record shows

that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.               Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave is GRANTED.            Counsel is excused from

      *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                2