Court Opinion

ID: 9815319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 00:40:09.733597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:37.495186
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Decided Oct 18, 1932
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on application of plaintiff in error for rehearing. The basis for rehearing is the submission of the case of Morton v Savin, 17 Oh Ap, 50.
We appreciate the courtesy of counsel for plaintiff in error in giving the court the benefit of decision which was not before it in the original hearing. However, as is recognized by counsel, this case was decided before the case of Boedker v Richards Company, 124 Oh St, 12, upon which we relied in our former decision. It follows then that the Morton case could not be controlling upon us.
We, therefore, adhere to our former decision and the application for rehearing will be denied.
ALLREAD, PJ, HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.