Court Opinion

ID: 1004173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:37:30.449563+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:36.014474
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6165

HENRY LOTSON SPENCE, SR.,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-446)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 26, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tara Louise Casey,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Spence v. Brooks, No. CA-00-446 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28,

2000).   We deny Spence’s motion for appointment of counsel and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2