Court Opinion

ID: 9823040
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 09:39:06.382557+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:13.716253
License: Public Domain

Taylor, J.,
with whom Kauger, J., joins, concurring:
The problem with this gist is exactly the same prqblem that I pointed out in my dissent in In re Initiative Petition No. 403, 2016 OK 1, 367 P.3d 472, wherein I stated, "The gist is dead on arrival,. Along with the unconstitutionality of Initiative Petition No. 403, the gist or proposed ballot title deceives potential signatories and potential voters. I would send Initiative Petition No. 403 back to the Respondents as the gist does not satisfy the statutory requirements set out by the Legislature." The exact same problem exists in this case and therefore I concur.
T9 REIF, C.J., dissent.
T 10 WATT, J., not participating.