Court Opinion

ID: 4234817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-06 01:00:23.664464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:57.335622
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-20326      Document: 00514296019         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/05/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                          United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 17-20326
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                                 FILED
                                                                           January 5, 2018
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELY PAULIN DELAFUNTE, also known as Eli De La Fuente, also known as
Eli Dela Fuente, also known as Ely De La Fuente, also known as Antonio H.
Gonzales, also known as Eli Paulin,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:16-CR-536-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ely Paulin
Delafunte has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Delafunte has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-20326    Document: 00514296019    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/05/2018

                                No. 17-20326

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2