Court Opinion

ID: 28346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 09:22:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:10.743150
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                     __________________________

      Consolidated Case Nos. 01-60543, 01-60544, 01-60545,
        01-60546, 01-60547, 01-60548, 01-60549, 01-60550,
   01-60551, 01-60552, 01-60553, 01-60554, 01-60555, 01-60556
                    __________________________

BANK ONE, N.A.,
                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                               versus

WILLIE QUINN, JAMES BIRDSONG, ANNIE WHEELER, ROBERT JACKSON, PERCY
CATCHINGS, RICKY DILLON, QUAKO CURTIS, MARGARETTA LOFTON, ELOISE
TILLIS, JAMES TILLIS, DAIRY STRICKLAND, TRENTICE WILSON, WILLIE
MCRUNNELS, GERTRUDE MILLER, AND RUBY HARRINGTON

                                             Defendants-Appellants.

         ___________________________________________________

            Appeals from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Mississippi
                            (3:01-CV-65-BN)
         ___________________________________________________
                             July 18, 2002

Before WIENER, E. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM1:

     Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings granting

Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and denying their motions

for abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury trial.     These

cases are indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled

     1
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

                                  1
on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd2 and Bank One,

N.A. v. Lake.3   For essentially the same reasons that are set forth

in our opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank

One, N.A. v. Coates,4 the judgments of the district court in these

cases are, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

     2
         288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
     3
         No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
     4
         125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).

                                  2