Court Opinion

ID: 1022247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:19:11.530595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:46.525479
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 06-7574

EUGENE NESBITT, JR.,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL G. BERG,

                                                Defendant - Appellee,

PARRIS   N.   GLENDENING;     MARTIN   O’MALLEY;
EDWARD T. NORRIS,

                                                           Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:06-cv-01605-WMN)

Submitted:   March 29, 2007                 Decided:   April 4, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Eugene Nesbitt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.    Nesbitt v.

Berg, No. 1:06-cv-01605-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006).    We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -