Court Opinion

ID: 996216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:47:37.932602+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.308472
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 97-7630

EUGENE RAFFALDT,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ROBERT WARD, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH
CAROLINA,

                                              Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.   Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-97-1091-2-23)

Submitted:   August 13, 1998                 Decided:   August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Raffaldt, Appellant Pro Se.    Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Raffaldt v. Ward, No. CA-97-1091-2-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 24,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2