Court Opinion

ID: 4565736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-15 20:18:56.748613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:09.930029
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-19-00557-CV

                               COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                       CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

WILLIAM E. CRIDDLE,                                                                 Appellant,

                                               v.

DALM ENTERPRISES, LLC,                              Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

            On appeal from County Court at Law No. 5
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
              Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina
                 Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was originally due on March 13, 2020.

On March 30, 2020, the Clerk of the Court sent notice to appellant instructing that this

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellees

were not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.
       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)(c).

                                                                       LETICIA HINOJOSA
                                                                       Justice

Delivered and filed the
10th day of September, 2020.

                                             2