Court Opinion

ID: 3192512
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-08 15:00:56.485045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:32:06.858298
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                      For the Eighth Circuit
                  ___________________________

                          No. 15-2629
                ___________________________

                    PAULA FESENMEYER

             lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

                                v.

   LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G.

 RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED

ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY

   AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS

   OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED

ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY

           lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

                        ____________

APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

    WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY
                  ____________
                 SUBMITTED: April 4, 2016
                   FILED: April 8, 2016
                       [Unpublished]
                      ____________

BEFORE LOKEN, BYE, AND KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
                    ____________

PER CURIAM.

   PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT

COURT1 DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY

RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES

ONLY   THE    DISTRICT   COURT’S   DENIAL   OF   CERTAIN

ACCOMMODATIONS.

   UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE

DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S

   1
    THE HONORABLE STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES

DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
                           -2-
VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C.

§ 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V.

LANE, 541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33 (2004) (DISCUSSING

REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER

ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE

AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE

DENIED.

           ______________________________

                         -3-