Court Opinion

ID: 7956935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 00:18:26.535752+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:18.086618
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The information charged the defendant with possession of a burglary tool, specifically a pressure puller commonly known as an “old man.” MCLA § 750.116 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.311). He pled guilty to attempted possession of a burglary tool and now appeals his conviction and from a denial of his motion to set aside his guilty plea.
The motion to set aside plea asserted that:
(1) the tool was specially designed to open a telephone coin box, that opening a telephone coin box is a misdemeanor (MCLA § 750.113 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.308]) and, therefore, the court was without jurisdiction to entertain a plea of guilty in respect to the charged offense because the only possible crime that could have been committed with it was that misdemeanor;
(2) the defendant was arrested March 5, 1968, but did not plead guilty until April 22, 1969 and he was denied a speedy trial.
The defendant’s first question, although stated in terms of jurisdiction, does not, in our opinion, raise a jurisdictional issue. The defendant pled guilty to a crime known to the laws of this State. The court had jurisdiction.
Upon his plea the defendant was convicted. He does not assert that his plea was coerced or other*343wise involuntary. It does not appear whether the defendant sought to offer testimony or other evidence in support of the claims and factual assertions set out in his motion to set aside guilty plea and supporting arguments; in any event, the presented record does not support those factual assertions.
A motion to set aside guilty plea is addressed to the trial judge’s discretion. We have no basis for concluding that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to set aside the defendant’s plea of guilty.
Affirmed.