Court Opinion

ID: 6733223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 23:15:08.507975+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:41.539516
License: Public Domain

ARNOLD, Judge.
The District Court agreed with defendant’s position that it was necessary for notice of appeal from a magistrate to the district court to be served by a judicial officer or accepted by the appellee. We agree with plaintiff’s position that service by mail was proper, and that it was error to dismiss the appeal.
G.S. 7A-228 provides the manner in which an appeal from a magistrate to the district court is perfected: “Appeal is perfected by serving written notice thereof on all other parties and by filing written notice with the clerk of superior court within 10 days after rendition of judgment.” Defendant relies upon G.S. 1-282 and cases cited thereunder holding that service must be by an officer unless accepted by the appellee. G.S. 1-282 was replaced by the new Rules of Appellate Procedure which do not apply to appeals from a magistrate to district court for trial de novo under G.S. 7A-228 et seq. (See Commentary to App. Rule 1.)
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 5(b) states that “With respect to such other pleadings and papers service upon the attorney or upon a party may also be made by delivering a copy to him or by mailing it to him at his last known address or, if no address is known, by filing it with the clerk of court.” We hold that this rule applies to the service of notice of appeal from a magistrate to the district court.
The order of the District Court dismissing the appeal is
Reversed.
Chief Judge Brock and Judge Parker concur.