Court Opinion

ID: 5785109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:57:30.566541+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:05.077880
License: Public Domain

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated November 18, 2008, as, upon terminating the mother’s parental rights, and after a dispositional hearing, directed that the two subject children be transferred to the home of Jeanette C., after a transition period, for the purpose of adoption.
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
An order of disposition pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 must be made solely on the basis of the best interests of the child (see Family Ct Act § 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136 [1984]). Here, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in determining that it is in the best interests of the two subject children to transfer them to the home of their aunt, Jeanette C., for the purpose of adoption. The Family Court’s determination, which was based on a firsthand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and of the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Celenia R., 264 AD2d 737 [1999]). Balkin, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.