Court Opinion

ID: 8438083
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:32:59.130046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:45.816072
License: Public Domain

PER CTJRIAM:
Lewis Moses Byrd seeks to appeal the district court's order granting the Government's motion to file its response to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion out of time and denying Byrd's motion to amend his § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.s.c. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Byrd seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.