Court Opinion

ID: 3077845
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:29:30.145947+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:50.729293
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                             ____________________
                                NO. 09-13-00095-CV
                             ____________________

          IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C.
                     D/B/A MORGAN LAW FIRM

_______________________________________________________                ______________

                                 Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________                _____________

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C. d/b/a Morgan Law Firm filed a petition

for writ of mandamus in which they seek to compel the trial court to vacate its venue

ruling and permit full venue discovery, to vacate its orders quashing venue discovery and

permit relators to depose venue fact witnesses, and to conduct a hearing on relators’

motion to disqualify opposing counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. After reviewing the

petition and mandamus record, we conclude that the relators have not shown that the trial

court committed a clear abuse of discretion for which the relators lack an adequate

                                           1
remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

      PETITION DENIED.

                                                           PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered March 14, 2013
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                           2