Court Opinion

ID: 8607275
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 04:26:47.675284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:17.391223
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Oscar Figueroa appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 90-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Figueroa’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.1
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Appellant’s September 20, 2006, motion is hereby denied.