Court Opinion

ID: 1011108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:22:07.533773+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:44.340752
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff - Appellee,

             versus

JULIAN TRAVON     SPENCER,    a/k/a   Julian   Lamar
Traffix,

                                                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-98-138-MU, CA-01-495-3-2-MU)

Submitted:    July 10, 2003                      Decided:   July 15, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Travon Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Julian Travon Spencer seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).   We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Spencer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.    See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322

(2003).   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2