Court Opinion

ID: 9927702
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-29 20:09:01.194401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:20.495343
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Drummond, 2024-Ohio-215.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                          ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                              ASHTABULA COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                  CASE NO. 2023-A-0071

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                Civil Appeal from the
        - vs -                                  Court of Common Pleas

JOHN E. DRUMMOND,
                                                Trial Court No. 2013 CR 00068
                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                       MEMORANDUM
                                         OPINION

                                   Decided: January 22, 2024
                                  Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Colleen M. O’Toole, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson,
OH 44047 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

John E. Drummond, pro se, PID# A462-868, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, 15802
OH-104, P.O. Box 5500, Chillicothe, OH 45601 (Defendant-Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.

        {¶1}     On December 13, 2023, appellant, John E. Drummond, pro se, filed a

pleading captioned as “Delay to file Crim.R. 33(B) Motion for Leave to file Notice of

Appeal,” construed by this court as a notice of appeal.

        {¶2}     Attached to appellant’s notice is an August 10, 2023 judgment entry. In the

entry, the trial court treated appellant’s pro se motions as petitions for postconviction relief

and denied them without a hearing.
       {¶3}   A timely notice of appeal from the August 10, 2023 entry was due no later

than September 11, 2023, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely

by over three months.

       {¶4}   “* * * [a] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.

4(A)(1).

       {¶5}   Postconviction proceedings are considered civil in nature. State v. Nichols,

11 Ohio St.3d 40 (1984) 41, 42; see also State v. Jones, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2021-

A-0012, 2021-Ohio-1696, ¶ 6.

       {¶6}   App.R. 4(A)(3) states in relevant part:

       {¶7}   “In a civil case, if the clerk has not completed service of notice of the

judgment within the three-day period prescribed in Civ.R. 58(B), the 30-day periods

referenced in App.R. 4(A)(1) and 4(A)(2) begin to run on the date when the clerk actually

completes service.”

       {¶8}   Here, there is a notation on the docket reflecting that the clerk mailed a copy

of the entry to appellant on August 10, 2023, the same date the entry was filed. Thus,

the time for filing the notice of appeal began to run on that date. The time requirement is

jurisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court. State ex rel.

Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988); App.R. 14(B).

       {¶9}   Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.

MATT LYNCH, J.,

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,

concur.
                                              2

Case No. 2023-A-0071