Court Opinion

ID: 2275593
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:57:22.464213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:35.173655
License: Public Domain

326 S.W.3d 504 (2010)
Eugene WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94047.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
November 16, 2010.
Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Prior report: 138 S.W.3d 755.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Williams (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).