Court Opinion

ID: 3553549
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:05:23.267106+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:33.681489
License: Public Domain

The machine was the property of the plaintiffs, whether the agreement is regarded as a lease or as a conditional sale. The title would not pass until the price was paid in full. Upon a demand of payment, and a refusal to comply within a reasonable time, or to deliver up the machine, the plaintiffs had a right to replevy it. Bailey v. Colby, 34 N.H. 29; Singer M'f'g Co. v. Graham, 8 Oreg. 17 — S.C., 34 Am. Rep. 572.
Exceptions overruled.
STANLEY, J., did not sit: the others concurred.