Court Opinion

ID: 4568122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-22 22:32:12.751605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:02.472150
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-2022

L. RUTHER,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

DONALD TRUMP; WILLIAM BARR,

                    Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01175-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: July 23, 2020                                          Decided: July 27, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without

prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ruther’s informal brief

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2