Court Opinion

ID: 5439820
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 18:00:03.885358+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:58.240142
License: Public Domain

By the Court (in bank, on petition for rehearing) :
This case was heard in Department 2 of this Court, and opinion filed August 18th, 1880. Application is made that the case be heard by the Court in bank. In addition to the facts stated in the opinion of the Department, the transcript shows that the defendant, in his answer, alleged that the payee of the note in suit induced defendant to execute the note by fraudulent and false representations as to the value of the mine and its stock, and that the representations were made for the purpose of cheating and defrauding defendant; that he represented the mine and its stock to be of great value, and that $10,000 worth of ore *462was on the dump; whereas, in truth and in fact, the stock and mine were of no value. There was evidence given by the parties relating to this issue ; the evidence was conflicting ; the Court properly instructed the jury regarding it, and the verdict is conclusive. Hearing in bank denied.