Court Opinion

ID: 7573855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:17:55.703469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:24.199543
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal of appellants’ convictions and sentences for grand theft. Although we affirm the convictions, we remand as to both appellants for hearings to determine the amount of restitution each must pay. McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.