Court Opinion

ID: 9737496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 19:27:06.513768+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:23:59.371463
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion
Hoffman, C.J.
I concur in the result reached but believe that the State did establish that the Smith-Corona adding machines were the property of G. C. Murphy Company.
Mr. Duane R. Marr, Assistant Manager of G. C. Murphy Company, testified:
“Q. And, whose adding machines were they?
“A. G. C. Murphy Company.”
This clearly established the ownership in G. C. Murphy Company. Mr. Marr’s explanation of his basis for this answer merely went to the weight of the testimony, and such was for the trier of the facts.
On appeal by a defendant we can only consider the evidence most favorable to the State with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom. We may not weigh the evidence. Therefore, the ownership in G. C. Murphy Company of the adding machines was clearly established.
I concur in the other parts of the opinion and with the result reached.
Sharp, J., concurs.
Note. — Reported at 301 N.E.2d 396.