Court Opinion

ID: 9424922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:13:12.334351+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:52.828324
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Douglas,
dissenting.
This case involves an apparently lawless action by a Selective Service Board.
The Regulations1 provide in pertinent part:
“A majority of the members of the local board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall decide any question or classification. . . . Every member present . . . shall vote on every question or classification.”
While petitioner had been classified as I-A and was ordered to report for induction,2 prior to the reporting date3 two letters were submitted to the Local Board asking for reconsideration of petitioner’s classification. The Board never considered the letters. The only decision was that of the chairman who talked only with the clerk of the Board. Whether the new presentation would satisfy the Regulations governing the reopening of a *978case can never be known because that is a decision that only the Board can make; and the Board never had a chance to reopen the classification or to keep it closed.
We talk much about law and order. But when we allow a Selective Service Board to act beyond the law, we embark upon a course of conduct that inflames an area already charged with emotions. Those charged with the responsibility of disposing of the lives and liberties of men should be the most meticulous in observing the Regulations which govern them.
I would grant this petition and set the case for argument.

 32 CFR § 1604.56.

 Petitioner was convicted of failure to report for induction and his defense was the Board’s failure to follow the Regulations.

 The order was mailed March 13, 1970, directing him to report on April 21, 1970.