Court Opinion

ID: 6095216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 20:21:20.840813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:42.239088
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Corso, J.), rendered September 6, 2000, convicting him of attempted sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.