Court Opinion

ID: 41048
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:58:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:37.984331
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  February 24, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 05-20522
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ-ROJAS,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 4:01-CR-910-ALL
                      --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender representing Jose Luis Gonzalez-

Rojas, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).        Gonzalez-

Rojas has not filed a response to the motion.       Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.