Court Opinion

ID: 9961857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-20 10:11:45.038742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:19:05.746354
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-24-00017-CV

                               IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                            TYLER, TEXAS

ARNALDO GALINDO IBARRA,                                   §   APPEAL FROM THE 7TH
APPELLANT

V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

5 STAR INDUSTRIAL
CONTAINERS, LLC,                                          §   SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEE

                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                            PER CURIAM

         Appellant, Arnaldo Galindo Ibarra, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal.
The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.        See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).
Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered April 17, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                 COURT OF APPEALS

     TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                          JUDGMENT

                                           APRIL 17, 2024

                                        NO. 12-24-00017-CV

                             ARNALDO GALINDO IBARRA,
                                      Appellant
                                         V.
                        5 STAR INDUSTRIAL CONTAINERS, LLC,
                                      Appellee

                                 Appeal from the 7th District Court
                         of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 24-0076-A)

                   THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellant
to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal
be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are
taxed against the party incurring same.

                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J