Court Opinion

ID: 9648305
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 14:13:09.033341+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:58.478236
License: Public Domain

JOHNSON, Judge,
dissenting.
On the unique facts of this case, the distinguished pretrial judge, the Honorable J. Quint Salmon, denied the request that the testimony of one daughter and certain letters written by the defendant be suppressed, while granting that portion of the motion in limine which sought the exclusion of the testimo*100ny of another daughter. I am unable to find any abuse of discretion by Judge Salmon. I would affirm upon his concise, well-reasoned Memorandum Opinion, filed April 5, 1993. Hence, this Dissenting Statement.