Court Opinion

ID: 1005141
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:52:22.549967+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:25.140902
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying his request for a copy of the district court’s sealed docket sheet. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
  
   United States v. Under Seal,
  
  No. CR-97-193 (D. Md. filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We deny the Appellant’s motion for release of sealed documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
   
   *183
   
  materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.