Court Opinion

ID: 9410876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-24 20:02:21.269127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:01.042594
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11743   Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 07/24/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-11743
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
      versus
      KEEO MILLER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Georgia
                D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00169-LGW-CLR-1
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11743      Document: 7-1       Date Filed: 07/24/2023      Page: 2 of 2

      2                       Opinion of the Court                    23-11743

      Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative of ap-
      peal no. 20-10194. Keeo Miller again appeals his final criminal judg-
      ment, but we already affirmed that judgment in January 2023. See
      United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (providing
      that an appellant “is not entitled to two appeals” from the same
      order or judgment). Although Miller apparently now wishes to
      challenge his sentence, which he did not do in his original appeal,
      he was required to “raise all claims of error in a single appeal fol-
      lowing final judgment on the merits.” See Firestone Tire & Rubber
      Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981); see also United States v. Curry,
      760 F.2d 1079, 1079 (11th Cir. 1985) (“In a criminal case the final
      judgment means the sentence. The sentence is the judgment.”).
             No petition for rehearing may be ﬁled unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.