Court Opinion

ID: 6541467
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:16:02.123264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:50.667919
License: Public Domain

English, C. J. This was a bill for divorce, brought in the Nevada Circuit Court by George S. Payne against his wife Mary Ann Payne. The bill alleged as cause for divorce that the wife had committed adultery with one Benjamin E. Snodgrass. The plaintiff proved by Snodgrass that he had had carnal intercourse with defendant, but his testimony was not only uncorroborated, but he admitted, on cross-examination, that he had stated to one Grayson that he believed that plaintiff had used him as a tool or instrument for the purpose of getting a divorce. The court below refused to grant a divorce on his testimony, and we shall decline to disturb the decree. Where the charge is adultery, the courts are reluctant to grant a divorce on the uncorroborated testimony of a particeps criminis. Abbott’s Trial Evidence, p. 747; Banta v. Banta, 3 Edw., ch. 295; Turney v. Turney, 4 Ib., 566; 2 Greenleaf Ev. (Rev. Ed.), sec. 47 and note 2; Simmons v. Simmons, 13 Texas, 558. Affirmed. (On a petition for reconsideration in this ease, which was denied, the court ordered that the decree dismissing the bill be so modified that the bill be dismissed at the cost of appellant, without prejudice.)