Court Opinion

ID: 2905976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:32:28.654966+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:59.211091
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-05-210 CR

NO. 09-05-211 CR

____________________

RONALD EDWIN DUNCAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court
San Jacinto County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 04-342 and 04-343

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
	On December 1, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeals would be dismissed
for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the records or the
appellant explained why he needed time for filing the records.  The appellant did not file
a response.  It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of
costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.  There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file
the records, the appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
	APPEALS DISMISSED.
								___________________________
								       CHARLES KREGER
										Justice
Opinion Delivered January 11, 2006 
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.