Court Opinion

ID: 9618907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 05:19:08.361145+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:33.514554
License: Public Domain

*251Fromme, J.,
dissenting: What was said in the dissenting opinion in Delight Wholesale Co. v. City of Overland Park, 203 Kan. 99, 105, 453 P. 2d 82, is equally applicable to the decision in this case. Sooner or later this court must face up to the growing traffic problems which exist in our metropolitan areas. The vending of frozen treats from slow moving vehicles traveling and parking on the traveled portions of the city streets add to the various other traffic hazards existing and will end in tragedy for one of the small patrons of Delight Wholesale Company. The governing body of the city in passing the ordinance acted reasonably to protect the health and safety of the citizens of its community.
Kaul, J., joins in the foregoing dissent.