Court Opinion

ID: 9398311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-30 20:04:12.49824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:32.565489
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAY 30 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    22-50021

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:20-cr-01470-LAB-1

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
ADRIANNA NICOLE RIVAS,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of California
                    Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before:      BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

      Adrianna Nicole Rivas appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for

making a false statement to a government agency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss pursuant to the

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
appeal waiver in Rivas’s plea agreement.

      Rivas contends that the appeal waiver is unenforceable because the

government breached the plea agreement. Because the parties are familiar with the

facts in this case, we do not recount them here. We have conducted a thorough

review of the record and conclude the government did not breach the plea

agreement. Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal.

See United States v. Hernandez-Castro, 814 F.3d 1044, 1046 (9th Cir. 2016).

      All pending motions are denied.

      DISMISSED.

                                           2                               22-50021