Court Opinion

ID: 692466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:16:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:35.968553
License: Public Domain

51 F.3d 267
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Matthew MURPHY, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Asresahegn GETACHEW, M.D.;  Willa Darrisaw, R.N.;  AlanDombrosky, P.A.;  Mr. Imode, Pharmacist/MedTech;  AlexanderWillis, R.N.;  Sandra Merson, R.N.;  Masfin Gabremichel,M.D.;  Brenda Lewis, Pharmacist, Defendants--Appellees,andMaryland House of Correction;  Rombro Health Services, Defendants.
No. 95-6082.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 1995Decided April 11, 1995

Matthew Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.  Philip Melton Andrews, Regina M. Dufresne, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Appellees;  Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Murphy v. Getachew, No. CA-93-2862-HAR (D. Md. Jan. 6, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 We note that because the district court fully considered Appellant's pleadings in opposition to summary judgment, any error by the district court in construing such pleadings as a motion for reconsideration was harmless