Court Opinion

ID: 6329367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-04 07:16:45.448325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:50.600078
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-22-00098-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

VETS SECURING AMERICA,                                                  Appellant,

                                             v.

EDWARD SMITH,                                       Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
 Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina
              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

      This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed amended motion to

dismiss appeal. Appellant requests dismissal, and appellee will not be prevented from

seeking relief to which he would otherwise be entitled.

      The Court, having considered appellant’s amended motion, is of the opinion that

the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellant’s
unopposed amended motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Because the appeal is

dismissed at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

                                                                     JAIME TIJERINA
                                                                     Justice

Delivered and filed on the
31st day of March, 2022.

                                            2