Court Opinion

ID: 7368738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-27 23:54:14.705233+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:50.764345
License: Public Domain

McCLELLAN, J.
(concurring.)—While I yield unreserved assent to the foregoing opinion and to the conclusion predicated of its considerations yet I prefer to rest my concurrence in the result here attained upon the primary ground that the order of the New York court, awarding alimony, is not such a final judgment as invokes the protection, or appropriates the force, of the “full fatih and credit clause” of the Constitution of the United States. — Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U. S. 183, 21 Sup. Ct. 555, 45 L. Ed. 810. The legal consequence is that the bill is without a factor essential to its equity.