Court Opinion

ID: 9548108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:57:36.993498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:18:27.987890
License: Public Domain

RABINO WITZ, Justice,
concurring.
I would uphold the superior court’s denial of appellant Eddie Griffith’s motion to suppress the knit cap without relying upon a “second glance” rationale. For in my view, study of the record convincingly shows that on the basis of the information available to Officer Trudeau, before he requested the jail personnel to inspect Griffith’s property locker and excluding all testimony concerning the inspection, the prosecution proved probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant in question.
I note my agreement with the court’s treatment of all other issues in this appeal.