Court Opinion

ID: 9934717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:54:33.019604+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:29.089495
License: Public Domain

Upon former consideration of this appeal, we were of the opinion that the trial court's judgment granting a new trial was not based on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the great preponderance of the evidence.
Upon certiorari to the Supreme Court the writ was granted, the court holding that we were in error in our conclusion, and that we are to presume that the judgment was based on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. The judgment of this court was reversed and the cause remanded for our further consideration.
Upon a reconsideration of the evidence, which is set out in our original opinion, after indulging all reasonable presumptions in favor of the court's ruling on the motion, we cannot say the evidence so plainly and palpably supports the verdict as *Page 418 
to put the trial court in error for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. Cobb v. Malone Collins, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.