Court Opinion

ID: 2694312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 22:13:46.838035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:55:13.063705
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Herron, 2011-Ohio-5021.]

                           IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                              SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 MONTGOMERY COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO                                       :
                                                    :      Appellate Case No. 24033
        Plaintiff-Appellee                          :
                                                    :      Trial Court Case No. 09-CR-1526
v.                                                  :
                                                    :
RODNEY HERRON                                :      (Criminal Appeal from
                                                    :      Common Pleas Court)
        Defendant-Appellant                  :
                                                    :
                                                 ..........
                                                 OPINION
                           Rendered on the 30th day of September, 2011.
                                                 ...........

MATHIAS H. HECK, JR., by LAURA M. WOODRUFF, Atty. Reg. #0084161, Montgomery
County Prosecutor’s Office, Appellate Division, Montgomery County Courts Building, P.O.
Box 972, 301 West Third Street, Dayton, Ohio 45422
      Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee

GLEN H. DEWAR, Atty. Reg. #0042077, Cicero Law Office, LLC, 500 East Fifth Street,
Dayton, Ohio 45402
      Attorney for Defendant-Appellant

                                                         .............

FAIN, J.

        {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Rodney Jay Herron appeals from his conviction and

sentence     on two counts of Murder (proximate result and purposeful), with firearm

specifications; two counts of Felonious Assault (deadly weapon and serious physical harm),
                                                                                           2

with firearm specifications; and one count of Possession of Heroin. The victim of the Murder

and Felonious Assault offenses was Kasey Fairman. Herron pled guilty to all charges.

       {¶ 2} Herron’s assigned counsel initially filed a brief under the authority of Anders v.

California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, indicating that counsel could

not find any potential assignments of error having arguable merit. We rejected the Anders

brief by entry filed herein on November 19, 2010, concluding that: “[T]here is an arguable

assignment of error arising out of the fact that the two Murder convictions, involving the same

victim, were not merged, and the two Felonious Assault convictions, involving the identical,

same victim, were not merged in the sentencing entry.” New appellate counsel was assigned.

                                                  I

       {¶ 3} Herron’s sole assignment of error is as follows:

       {¶ 4} “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO MERGE ALL MURDER

AND FELONIOUS ASSAULT CHARGES AS ALLIED OFFENSES OF SIMILAR IMPORT

WHERE THE APPELLANT AT ONE TIME COMMITTED A SINGLE ACT FOR A

SINGLE PURPOSE AGAINST A SINGLE VICTIM WITH A SINGLE RESULT.”

       {¶ 5} The trial court ordered the firearm specification three-year sentences to merge

into a single three-year sentence to be served consecutively with, and prior to, the sentences

for the principal offenses. The sentences for the two Murder convictions, the two Felonious

Assault convictions, and the one Possession of Heroin conviction were ordered to be served

concurrently. But the convictions themselves were not merged.

       {¶ 6} The State concedes that under the law in effect at the time of the sentencing
                                                                                            3

hearing, the two Murder convictions should have been merged as allied offenses of similar

import under R.C. 2941.25, and the two Felonious Assault convictions should have merged as

allied offenses, as well. The State further concedes that after State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio

St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, the surviving Felonious Assault conviction should have been

merged with the surviving Murder conviction. In the filing the State has made pursuant to

our Local App. R. 2.24, the State: “ * * * gives notice of its agreement for remand of this case

to the trial court for election and merger.”

       {¶ 7} We agree with Herron and the State that after State v. Johnson, the two Murder

convictions must merge; the two Felonious Assault convictions must merge; and the surviving

Felonious Assault conviction must merge with the surviving Murder conviction.

       {¶ 8} Herron’s sole assignment of error is sustained.

                                                 II

       {¶ 9} Herron’s sole assignment of error having been sustained, his convictions for

Murder and for Felonious Assault are Reversed, and this cause is Remanded for the merger of

those convictions, with the State making its election of which conviction shall survive, and for

re-sentencing for the surviving conviction. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial

court is Affirmed.

                                                  .............

GRADY, P.J., and FROELICH, J., concur.

Copies mailed to:

Mathias H. Heck
                        4

Laura M. Woodruff
Glen H. Dewar
Hon. Dennis J. Adkins