Court Opinion

ID: 1005330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:54:49.376932+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:33.804251
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 01-6278

MARSHALL STOWE,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-96-46, CA-01-9)

Submitted:   August 28, 2001             Decided:   September 10, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marshall Stowe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Marshall Stowe appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   Stowe v. Brooks, Nos. CR-96-46; CA-01-9 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 31,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2