Court Opinion

ID: 9399747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-06 14:01:10.112885+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:39.825293
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-10497    Document: 32-1     Date Filed: 06/06/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-10497
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       JOSHUA SHANE DAVIS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00130-TFM-MU-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10497      Document: 32-1     Date Filed: 06/06/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-10497

       Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Scott Wayne Hunter, appointed counsel for Joshua Shane
       Davis in this appeal following the district court’s revocation of su-
       pervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
       tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califor-
       nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
       ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
       appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
       record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Davis’s supervised
       release and his new revocation sentence are AFFIRMED.