Court Opinion

ID: 9551444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:53:32.34583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:23:51.000619
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
The petition of respondents for rehearing of this cause is denied. Notwithstanding the intemperate and impertinent language of the attorney for respondents in Ms petition for rehearing, we have carefully reread arid again scrutinized the record. Upon consideration of respondents’ petition in connection with the record we find no sufficient reason for change or modification of the original opinion.
The petition of appellant for a rehearing is also denied.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on September 19,1935.
Seawell, J., and Shenk, J., voted for a hearing.