Court Opinion

ID: 8477968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:46:20.095004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:28.321336
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2009; Dec. 9, 2009). We dény Ellerbe’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.