Court Opinion

ID: 9866352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 04:32:14.024878+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:20.348278
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING.
Defendants insist that there is no evidence that the automobile in question, at the time it was sold by them to plaintiff, was a new ear. *770There is no evidence either way on this point bnt the inferences from the- evidence are that the automobile was new. In soliciting the sale the' car shown plaintiff was a new car and the printed matter in the order introduced in evidence by defendants refers ■ to the automobile in question as “the new car.” These circumstances raise an inference that the automobile purchased by plaintiff was a new car.
The other points mentioned in the motion for a rehearing are fully covered in the opinion.
The motion for a rehearing is overruled.