Court Opinion

ID: 9442628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 18:53:57.179028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:29:09.828093
License: Public Domain

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge
(concurring specially).
Stevenson, in his answer, alleged among other things, that the lease of the premises to Popplewell was upon the express “understanding, condition and agreement” that she would operate the leased premises as a first class hotel and would offer for rent to the public all of the 26 rooms, and that he would not have leased the premises to Popplewell but for her express agreement *115that she would offer the 26 rooms for rent to the public.
Stevenson has never had an opportunity in the trial court to present evidence in support of that allegation. I regard it as sufficient to raise the question of good faith on the part of Popplewell in occupying three of the rooms and failing to offer such rooms for rent to the public, and would reverse and remand with instructions to hear and determine such issue of good faith.