Court Opinion

ID: 2290607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:59:49.683343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:06.098570
License: Public Domain

323 S.W.3d 94 (2010)
James WILLYARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93971.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
October 19, 2010.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Prior report: 31 S.W.3d 513.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, James Willyard, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).