Court Opinion

ID: 9728693
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 14:14:31.660507+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:34.154491
License: Public Domain

Colwell, District Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the result of the majority opinion. However, I object to the finding that the original decree of dissolution, as it relates to the use of the residence, did constitute a division of property and that the decree was not ambiguous.
Those findings might be warranted if those particular issues were presented by pleadings and the evidence at the modification hearing. They were not. The only issue there presented was whether the decree should be modified to change child custody. The trial court had no jurisdiction to either consider *23or order the sale of the residence, and this court should not determine any issue related to that void finding.