Court Opinion

ID: 4101122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-22 17:10:53.940075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:48.358935
License: Public Domain

Boolbol v Paradigm Mgt. Group, LLC (2016 NY Slip Op 07875)

Boolbol v Paradigm Mgt. Group, LLC

2016 NY Slip Op 07875

Decided on November 22, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 22, 2016

Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Richter, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.

2288 101287/09

[*1]Jeffrey Boolbol, Plaintiff-Appellant,
vParadigm Management Group, LLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents, RN Realty LLC, Defendant.

Ateshoglou & Aiello, P.C., New York (Steven D. Ateshoglou of counsel), for appellant.
Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson (Glenn A. Kaminska of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Nervo, J.), entered February 3, 2015, upon a jury verdict, in defendants' favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The trial court properly ruled that the statement in an ambulance report that plaintiff "lost his footing going down the steps" was inadmissible as a prior consistent statement
(see People v McDaniel , 81 NY2d 10, 18 [1993]). There was evidence at trial that plaintiff's fall was the result not of an accident but of a voluntary leap down the stairs, but plaintiff's motive to fabricate had arisen at the moment that he landed and hurt himself.
The trial court properly declined to give a missing document charge as to a claimed surveillance videotape and photographs taken by an employee of defendant the Mansion (see Martelly v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. , 276 AD2d 373 [1st Dept 2000]). Plaintiff failed to show that the videotape ever existed. He failed to show that the photographs would be relevant to any disputed factual issue.
In its verdict interrogatories, the trial court properly limited defendants' liability to the absence of handrails on the stairs since there was no evidence to support any other theory of liability (Fallon v Damianos , 192 AD2d 576 [2d Dept 1993], lv denied  83 NY2d 751 [1994]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 22, 2016
CLERK