Court Opinion

ID: 5917327
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:16:22.956683+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:14.821935
License: Public Domain

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered on or about June 29, 1989, which, in an action seeking, inter alia, specific performance of a contract for the sale of a condominium apartment, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We find that the court properly denied summary judgment. A fair reading of the contract of sale supports finding a triable issue of fact as to whether paragraph 4 of the rider constitutes an escape clause, thus allowing the defendant to unilaterally cancel the sale (Krasne v Gedell, 147 AD2d 616, 618). While normally the interpretation of the words in a contract is for the court, the meaning of the clause at issue, to wit: "unable or fails to convey title”, is unclear, and that and other possible questions of fact must be resolved at trial (cf., Barclay Arms Assocs. v Clemente, 98 AD2d 892). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.