Court Opinion

ID: 9412760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 15:10:02.743592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:17.011802
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                      San Antonio, Texas

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                         No. 04-23-00640-CV

                                      IN RE Danielle ROBBINS

                                         Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                  Beth Watkins, Justice
                  Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 26, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

           On June 30, 2023, Relator Danielle Robbins filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After

considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

Relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied as moot. Real party in interest DoorDash Inc.’s

motion for joinder is denied as moot.

                                                     PER CURIAM

1
 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI21886, styled David Ybarra and Andres Hernandez Garcia v.
Danielle Robbins and DoorDash, Inc., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The
Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presided over the orders at issue.