Court Opinion

ID: 9414699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 16:00:48.451048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:57.276721
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1387
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                           v.

                                 Kori Dawn Hobbs,

                      lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: July 20, 2023
                               Filed: August 2, 2023
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Kori Hobbs appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after Hobbs
pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a

      1
       The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness
of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that Hobbs’s sentence was not
substantively unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked
a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or
committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United
States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

      We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                      ______________________________

                                         -2-