Court Opinion

ID: 9626514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 08:15:18.731815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:02.490627
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Groves
dissenting:
I. dissent, but mildly.
The collection of cases in the annotation commencing at’7 A.L.R. 3d 414 leads me to believe that there is ample authority to support a holding either way in this matter. When the insured permitted the policy to lapse and then *428attempted, to obtain coverage for an accident by making payment of premium following the accident, I would enforce the provision of the policy reading that it covers “only loss resulting from such accidental bodily injury as may be sustained after the date of reinstatement.”
Mr. Justice Day joins in this dissent.