Court Opinion

ID: 9619535
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 05:29:32.737159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:00.068098
License: Public Domain

HOWE, Justice
(dissenting):
I dissent. Although this case presents a close question, I do not agree with the majority that the decision of the Board of Review does not fall within the limits of reasonableness and rationality. I am satisfied that there is competent evidence on the basis of which the Department, Board of Review and appeal referee reasonably con-eluded that all three of the A, B and C exclusionary tests had not been met. In such cases, it is our duty to affirm since we are required to canvass the facts in a light most favorable to the findings of the Board of Review. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. Board of Review, 11 Utah 2d 283, 358 P.2d 340 (1961).