Court Opinion

ID: 9374305
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-22 19:00:34.713166+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:50.795197
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FEB 22 2023
                                                                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                        U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        Nos. 20-30057
                                                     20-30058
                Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                 D.C. Nos. 1:19-cr-02033-SMJ-1
 v.                                                        1:16-cr-02005-SMJ-1

JOSE JESUS MIRANDA-REYES, AKA                    MEMORANDUM*
Antolin Chavez Sandobal, AKA Jose
Miranda, AKA Jose Reyes,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Washington
                  Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted February 14, 2023**

Before:      FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

      In these consolidated appeals, Jose Jesus Miranda-Reyes appeals his guilty-

plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release predicated in

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
part on that conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

      Miranda-Reyes argues that the district court should have dismissed the

indictment and petition to revoke supervised release because deficiencies in the

notices to appear in his removal proceedings deprived the immigration court of

jurisdiction to order his removal. During the pendency of this appeal, we decided

United States v. Bastide-Hernandez, which forecloses Miranda-Reyes’s claim. See

39 F.4th 1187, 1192-93 (9th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (holding that defects in a notice

to appear do not deprive the immigration court of subject matter jurisdiction), cert.

denied, No. 22-6281, 2023 WL 350056 (U.S. Jan. 23, 2023).

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                          20-30057 & 20-30058