Court Opinion

ID: 3106234
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:58:03.521017+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:22:12.610697
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00411-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                      THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

KEN FLEMING AND PAUL BARRETT,
DIRECTORS OF FAMILY LIFE REVIVAL
CENTER, INC.,                                                                      APPELLANTS,

                                                   v.

CHARLES EDWARD BARBER,
DIRECTOR OF FAMILY LIFE REVIVAL
CENTER, INC.,                                     APPELLEE.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 13th District Court
                   of Navarro County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                          Before Justices Vela, Perkes, and Hill1
                           Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

        1
          Retired Second Court of Appeals Justice John G. Hill assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice
of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to the government code. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 74.003
(Vernon 2005).
      Appellants, Ken Fleming and Paul Barrett, perfected an appeal from a judgment

entered by the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, in cause number

07-16291-CV. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss on grounds that all matters

in controversy between them in this cause have been fully compromised and settled.

The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.             In

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
14th day of April, 2011.

                                            2