Court Opinion

ID: 9400963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-09 19:09:01.626437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:49.189986
License: Public Domain

People v Franklin (2023 NY Slip Op 03149)

People v Franklin

2023 NY Slip Op 03149

Decided on June 9, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 9, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

510 KA 20-00049

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vCHARLES FRANKLIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ERIN A. TRESMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MINDY F. VANLEUVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered April 22, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law
§§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. As defendant contends and the People correctly concede, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Thornton, 213 AD3d 1332, 1332 [4th Dept 2023]; People v Cole, 201 AD3d 1360, 1360-1361 [4th Dept 2022]). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: June 9, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court