Court Opinion

ID: 9310430
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:38:42.70093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:07.449375
License: Public Domain

Opinion-ON Application por a Rehearing.
On application for leave to reargue this cause our attention is directed to the testimony of Mr. George Schmidt, the president of the bank. While it is true that checks coming through the clearing house may be returned at any time before one o ’clock on Saturday and four o’clock on other days, and final payment made at that time, yet on Saturday, November 9th, the checks were entered in the account about eleven o’clock, and payment became absolute at one o ’clock, not because of deposits made on that day, but because there was a balance in the account carried *125over from the preceding day sufficient to pay the cheeks except the comparatively small sum of $70.09.
This particular fund could not therefore be traced by the plaintiff as in the .possession of the bank after the checks were charged to the account.
Application denied.