Court Opinion

ID: 9684411
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:56:01.76395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:55.591195
License: Public Domain

CONCURRING OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
While I agree with the disposition of this application, I wish to call to petitioner’s attention the fact that this Court has before it an affidavit executed by the Chief Appellate Counsel for Oakland County, Michigan, in which he swears that a thorough search of the records of the Circuit Court of said county reveals that petitioner was not represented by an attorney at the time he was convicted of the offense alleged for enhancement in paragraph two of the indictment in Kanaziz v. State, supra.
Such affidavit will be made available to petitioner when he makes his new application to the trial court.
I concur.