Court Opinion

ID: 6320741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-07 15:11:47.148991+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:38.337255
License: Public Domain

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Atlantic Wind, LLC                 :
                                   :   CASES CONSOLIDATED
           v.                      :
                                   :
Zoning Hearing Board of Penn       :
Forest Township                    :
                                   :
Bethlehem Authority                :
                                   :
           v.                      :
                                   :
Zoning Hearing Board of Penn       :
Forest Township                    :
                                   :
Appeal of: Bethlehem Authority     :   No. 585 C.D. 2020
                                   :
                                   :
Atlantic Wind, LLC,                :
                       Appellant   :
                                   :
           v.                      :
                                   :
Penn Forest Township               :
Zoning Hearing Board               :   No. 591 C.D. 2020
                                   :
                                   :
Bethlehem Authority                :
                                   :
           v.                      :
                                   :
Penn Forest Township Zoning        :
Hearing Board                      :
                                   :
Appeal of: Atlantic Wind, LLC      :   No. 20 C.D. 2021
Bethlehem Authority,                     :
                          Appellant      :
                                         :
             v.                          :
                                         :
The Zoning Hearing Board of              :
Penn Forest Township                     :          No. 242 C.D. 2021

PER CURIAM                            ORDER

             NOW, March 7, 2022, having considered Appellee Penn Forest

Township’s and “42 Intervenors’” applications for reargument, and Appellant’s

answers in response thereto, the applications are denied.