Court Opinion

ID: 9694608
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 17:48:43.182536+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:03.956277
License: Public Domain

Justice WALLACE, JR.,
concurring.
I concur in the result. Unlike the majority, I cannot distinguish this case from Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.M., 189 N.J. 261, 914 A.2d 1265 (2007). In my view, in both this case and in M.M., the Division failed to satisfy by clear and convincing *610evidence the requirements of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1a to justify termination of parental rights.
Justice RIVERA-SOTO joins in this opinion.
For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice ZAZZALI and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN and HOENS — 5.
For concurrence — Justices WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO— 2.