Court Opinion

ID: 1020676
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:54:53.537922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:35.276617
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6991

JERRY LEE WINSLOW,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. W. ARMENTROUT, Warden; T. EVANS, CIRC/LL
Clerk,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.      Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cv-00727-jlk-mf)

Submitted: September 28, 2006              Decided: October 11, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Winslow, Appellant Pro Se.      Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Jerry Lee Winslow appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.    Winslow v.

Armentrout, No. 7:05-cv-00727-jlk-mf (W.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2006).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                              - 2 -