Court Opinion

ID: 8209754
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-28 00:00:28.212817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:44.367209
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10191      Document: 00516486385         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/27/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                    September 27, 2022
                                  No. 22-10191                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Reynaldo Cruz, Jr.,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:21-CR-95-1

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Reynaldo Cruz, Jr., has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-10191    Document: 00516486385          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/27/2022

                                  No. 22-10191

   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2