Court Opinion

ID: 996533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:52:29.030532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:09.787602
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6445

JAMES M. HOGSTON,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
96-3804-DKC)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998            Decided:   October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. Hogston, Appellant Pro Se.     John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James M. Hogston appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Hogston v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-96-

3804-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2