Court Opinion

ID: 9353231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-11 16:00:46.949179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:09:18.651387
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                      ____________
No. 22-5213                                                September Term, 2022
                                                                       1:22-cv-01483-UNA
                                                      Filed On: January 11, 2023
Brud Rossmann, Esquire,

              Appellant

       v.

Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United
States, et al.,

              Appellees

            ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

       BEFORE:       Millett and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit
                     Judge

                                     JUDGMENT

        This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

         ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s July 15, 2022 order
dismissing appellant’s complaint be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that
the complaint, which lacked an arguable basis either in law or in fact, was frivolous.
See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (district court “shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines
that . . . the action or appeal . . . is frivolous or malicious”).

        Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 22-5213                                                September Term, 2022

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

                                       Per Curiam

                                                         FOR THE COURT:
                                                         Mark J. Langer, Clerk

                                                 BY:     /s/
                                                         Daniel J. Reidy
                                                         Deputy Clerk