Court Opinion

ID: 9391038
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-29 00:00:47.682606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:39.261082
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50804         Document: 00516731429             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/28/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50804
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                                 April 28, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jose Luis Jaimes-Reynoso,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:19-CR-2771-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jose Luis Jaimes-Reynoso has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes-Reynoso has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50804    Document: 00516731429         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/28/2023

                                 No. 22-50804

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                          2