Court Opinion

ID: 682226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:40:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:25.935444
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1189
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robbin Bradley COOK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-50855.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 1, 1994.*Decided Nov. 8, 1994.

Before:  WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Robbin Bradley Cook appeals his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a).  Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cook's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3