Court Opinion

ID: 1029791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:03:26.028256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:40:38.421744
License: Public Domain

*863
   
  Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Sharon Moats appeals from the district court’s orders granting judgment in favor of the Defendant in her professional liability action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and alleging medical malpractice by physicians at Shenandoah Community Health Center and denying her motion for reconsideration, a new trial, and judgment.
  
   *
  
  Moats argues on appeal that the district court erred in finding that the Shenandoah Community Health Center physicians were not negligent in their care of her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Moats,
  
  Nos. 3:06-cv00120-JPB-JES; 3:07-cv-00022-JPB (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 19 & 27, 2008).
 

  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.
  

   *
  

   The United States was substituted as the Defendant for the physicians at Shenandoah Community Health Center.