Court Opinion

ID: 1028365
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:39:18.074402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:33:23.188851
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Carl Edward Bennett appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Bennett,
  
  No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.