Court Opinion

ID: 9828720
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:38:55.045969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:52.146395
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Our attention has been called in a motion for rehearing to the fact; that our original opinion neglected to state that this suit was for the purpose of removing a cloud to the *864title of the land described in appellants’ petition cast by the judgment that had been rendered in favor of appellees and against appellants, as well as the relief by injunction as stated in the original opinion. The description in the judgment of the land recovered by appellees in their suit against appellants is the same as the description of the land in the writ of possession served by the sheriff, and this omission in no way affects the disposition of this cause.
In view of the earnest insistence by appellants in an able motion for rehearing that error was committed in the original opinion in holding that the land described in plaintiffs’ petition, and claimed by plaintiffs, was the land recovered by appellees in their judgment, we have again carefully gone over all questions raised, with the result that we have reached the same conclusion.