Court Opinion

ID: 2894699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 23:43:27.277568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:22:00.222557
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-07-0483-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 13, 2007
______________________________

DAVID E. FLOWERS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________

FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;

NO. 95122; HONORABLE CHARLES D. CARVER, JUDGE
_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

	  Appellant David E. Flowers filed a document with this Court on November 28,
2007, entitled "Petition for Acquittal and Arrest of Judgment Review," which, as we read
the document, raises issues in connection with his conviction and sentencing in a district
court of Jefferson County.  The document references cause number 95122 in the Criminal
District Court of Jefferson County, and recites that appellant also has an appeal from the
judgment pending in the Ninth Court of Appeals, filed in September 2007.  
	This Court's appellate jurisdiction generally is limited to cases appealed from trial
courts in our court of appeals district.  Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.201 (Vernon 2004).  We
see no basis for jurisdiction over appeal of appellant's Jefferson County conviction.
	Appellant's petition filed in this Court refers to Rule 17.1 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure, dealing with instances in which a court of appeals is unable to take
immediate action, and Rule 17.2, providing for action by "the nearest court of appeals that
is able to take immediate action."  Tex. R. App. P. 17.1, 17.2.  Appellant appears to
contend that the rule has application here.  Based on the statements in appellant's petition,
we disagree that Rule 17 of the appellate rules has application in the circumstances
described.  In addition, appellant provides no explanation how, given the great distance
between Beaumont and Amarillo, this Court could be considered the nearest available
court of appeals.
	Finally, we take judicial notice of the opinion delivered November 28, 2007, by the
Ninth Court of Appeals, disposing of appellant's appeal from the trial court cause number
referenced in the document filed in this Court.  Flowers v. State, No. 09-07-0489-CR, 2007
WL 4208754 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, November 28, 2007) (memo. op.) (not selected for
publication). The issuance of that opinion would appear to render moot the issues
appellant attempts to raise here.

	For these reasons, we find we lack jurisdiction over appellant's attempted appeal. 
Accordingly, it is dismissed.

							James T. Campbell
							          Justice

Do not publish.