Court Opinion

ID: 9533592
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:32:58.255231+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:05.574035
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE ADAIR:
(dissenting in part but concurring in result).
I concur in the result but not in all that is said in the foregoing majority opinion. The carefully considered decisions in Herrin v. Sieben, 46 Mont. 226, 127 Pac. 323, and Violet v. Martin, 62 Mont. 335, 205 Pac. 221, should not be overruled, for in my opinion the facts and circumstances which there obtained, and the rules of law there applicable, are readily distinguishable from those of the instant case. Accordingly I dissent to *502tbe overruling of the Herrin case, supra, and of the Violet case, supra.