Court Opinion

ID: 989662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:10:13.009427+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:53.070171
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-8527

MARK KING,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. H. SNODGRASS; B. WALTON,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge. (CA-95-316-R)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                 Decided:   June 27, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark King, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attor-
ney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. King v. Snodgrass, No. CA-95-316-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1995).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2