Court Opinion

ID: 9889436
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-10 14:13:15.806863+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.077616
License: Public Domain

2023 WI 68

             SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
CASE NO.:              2021AP311-CR

COMPLETE TITLE:        State of Wisconsin,
                                 Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
                            v.
                       Donte Quintell McBride,
                                 Defendant-Appellant.

                          REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
                          Reported at 405 Wis. 2d 771,985 N.W.2d 452
                                     (2023 – unpublished)

OPINION FILED:         October 10, 2023
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS:
ORAL ARGUMENT:         September 15, 2023

SOURCE OF APPEAL:
   COURT:              Circuit
   COUNTY:             Milwaukee
   JUDGE:              Jonathan D. Watts

JUSTICES:
Per Curiam.
NOT PARTICIPATING:
Janet C. Protasiewicz, J.

ATTORNEYS:
       For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, there were briefs
filed by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general, with whom
on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general.         There was an
oral argument by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general.

       For the defendant-appellant, there was a brief filed by
Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. There was an
oral argument by Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender.
                                                                  2023 WI 68
                                                          NOTICE
                                            This opinion is subject to further
                                            editing and modification.   The final
                                            version will appear in the bound
                                            volume of the official reports.
No.    2021AP311-CR
(L.C. No.   2018CF5172)

STATE OF WISCONSIN                      :            IN SUPREME COURT

State of Wisconsin,

            Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
                                                              FILED
      v.                                                 OCT 10, 2023

Donte Quintell McBride,                                   Samuel A. Christensen
                                                         Clerk of Supreme Court

            Defendant-Appellant.

      REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals.          Affirmed.

      ¶1     PER CURIAM.   The decision of the court of appeals is

affirmed by an equally divided court.

      ¶2     JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did not participate.
    No.   2021AP311-CR

1