Court Opinion

ID: 988841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:58:26.555954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.833535
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-6651

ELIJAH RANSOM,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF MARYLAND,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92-
2805-L)

Submitted:   December 5, 1995             Decided:   March 26, 1996

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elijah Ransom, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Kathryn Grill Graeff, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ransom
v. Smith, No. CA-92-2805-L (D. Md. Apr. 4, 1995). We deny Appel-

lant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2