Court Opinion

ID: 8246674
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 09:36:22.947622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:46.144877
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, Justice,
dissenting.
[¶ 23] I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 24] The district court’s analysis clearly shows that it found no basis to grant relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60, which was the manner in which relief was sought in this action. The district court was free to revisit its previous rulings until it issued its final decision. The district court has adequately explained its decision.
[¶ 25] I would affirm the decision of the district court.
[¶ 26] Dale V. Sandstrom