Court Opinion

ID: 5360164
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 07:21:05.945631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:51.724737
License: Public Domain

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The question is presented whether a policy of workmen’s compensation and employers’ liability insurance issued by the plaintiff-insurer covers a claim by an employee for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from silicosis. The plaintiff-insurer has thus far successfully maintained that its policy here in suit — which is the standard form for such insurance — applies only to injuries resulting from accidents occurring during the period of coverage and that within the terms of its insurance contract, the onset of silicosis is not an accidental personal injury. Believing that the Special Term was justified, upon the pleadings and as a matter of discretion, in dealing with the issues by means of the remedy afforded by declaratory judgment (James v. Alderton Dock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298; Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 id. 304, 311, 312), we affirm the declaratory judgment upon the reasoning of the opinion by Larkin, J., in Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hamera (162 Misc. 169). All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for a declaratory judgment to determine the coverage of a liability insurance policy.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.