Court Opinion

ID: 994367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:22:03.224834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.796468
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARK STEPHEN PAYNE,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-90-73-R, CA-97-77-R)

Submitted:   January 13, 1998             Decided:   March 12, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Stephen Payne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Payne, Nos. CR-90-73-R; CA-97-77-R (W.D.
Va. Feb. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2