Court Opinion

ID: 1005689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:00:04.359178+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:30.275053
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6888

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-98-137)

Submitted:   October 18, 2001             Decided:   October 25, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Lamont Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

        James Lamont Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).    We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.    See United States v. Johnson, No. CR-98-137 (M.D.N.C. Mar.

30, 2001).    We grant Johnson’s motion to file supplemental mate-

rial.    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2