Court Opinion

ID: 9911836
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-20 21:01:41.880242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:57:31.038606
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13898     Document: 10-1      Date Filed: 12/20/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                     In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eleventh Circuit

                           ____________________

                                  No. 23-13898
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                           ____________________

       SKYE ELLEN MUSSON,
                                                        Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       SHALENA COOK JONES,
       in her individual and oﬃcial capacities,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant,

       CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al.,

                                                              Defendants.
USCA11 Case: 23-13898      Document: 10-1       Date Filed: 12/20/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                       Opinion of the Court                  23-13898

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 4:22-cv-00124-RSB-CLR
                           ____________________

       Before Wilson, Rosenbaum, and Grant, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Shalena Cook Jones appeals from the district court’s order
       that struck Jones’s answer, entered default against her, and
       awarded Skye Musson all reasonable costs, attorney’s fees, and ex-
       penses as a sanction for discovery obligations. We lack jurisdiction
       to review the court’s sanction order because it did not determine
       the amount of costs, attorney’s fees, and expenses for which Jones
       is responsible, and it is therefore not final and appealable. See 28
       U.S.C. § 1291; PlayNation Play Sys., Inc. v. Velex Corp., 939 F.3d 1205,
       1212 (11th Cir. 2019). Additionally, the sanction order is not im-
       mediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine because it
       did not conclusively determine the disputed question of the
       amount for which Jones is responsible. See Plaintiff A v. Schair, 744
       F.3d 1247, 1253 (11th Cir. 2014).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.