Court Opinion

ID: 9907158
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-05 20:01:10.15085+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:34.665043
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13549   Document: 14-1    Date Filed: 12/05/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-13549
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       ERICA VINSON,
       TAYLOR TAYLOR,
       MARK GOLDENBERG,
                                                  Plaintiﬀs-Appellees,
       versus
       THEE TREE HOUSE, LLC

                                                          Defendant,

       THOMAS ORTIZ,
USCA11 Case: 23-13549     Document: 14-1      Date Filed: 12/05/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                23-13549

                                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cv-01928-WFJ-SPF
                           ____________________

       Before GRANT, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
                This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Thomas Ortiz, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district
       court’s orders and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against
       Ortiz. The orders and judgment are not final and appealable, how-
       ever, because the district court has not yet resolved the rights and
       liabilities of Thee Tree House, LLC and did not certify its judgment
       for immediate appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
       Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022);
       Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir.
       2012).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.