Court Opinion

ID: 9715774
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 06:13:57.691897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:38.058982
License: Public Domain

Digges, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I fully concur in the views of the Court as expressed in its opinion written by Chief Judge Murphy. However, prior to today’s decision there existed in this State a sparsity of precedence and guidance for litigants and trial courts with regard to the subject of this very important litigation. Accordingly, I would, in the interest of justice, not affirm the judgment but remand the case to the trial court (with additional testimony being permitted) for evaluation of the evidence and a new decision by the chancellor rendered in light of the opinion now being filed. Maryland Rule 871.