Court Opinion

ID: 4432976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-24 05:16:41.741767+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:56.198890
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                            OF TEXAS
                                          NO. WR-90,210-01

                        EX PARTE NICHOLAS RYAN ONEAL, Applicant

                    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. CR18223-A IN THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT
                                 FROM WISE COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with

intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The Second

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. O’Neal v. State, No. 02-16-00217-CR (Tex. App. — Fort

Worth August 24, 2017) (not designated for publication.

        Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

        1
            This Court has considered Applicant’s other claim and finds it to be without merit.
                                                                                                        2

because trial counsel failed to request an instruction on the lesser-included offense of possession of

a controlled substance, failed to file a motion to suppress the evidence on the basis of an unlawful

warrantless search and seizure, and failed to subpoena the other occupant of the vehicle in which

Applicant was sitting at the time of his arrest.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Specifically, trial counsel shall state whether there was any evidence indicating that if Applicant was

guilty it was only of the lesser offense of possession of a controlled substance. Trial counsel shall

state whether Applicant pleaded true to prior sequential felony convictions, and whether Applicant

would have been subject to a lower punishment range if he were convicted of the offense of

possession of a controlled substance without the intent to deliver. Trial counsel shall state whether

there was any basis upon which he could have filed a motion to suppress the evidence, and if so, why

counsel did not file such a motion. Trial counsel shall state whether the other occupant of the vehicle

in which Applicant was arrested took responsibility for the drugs, and if so, whether the other

occupant was available and willing to testify to this fact. The trial court may use any means set out

in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its

personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
                                                                                                      3

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 21, 2019

Do not publish