Court Opinion

ID: 9446688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-03 22:16:19.964372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:30:44.824207
License: Public Domain

Sur Petition for Rehearing
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, MeLATJCHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, ■Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing forcefully restates arguments which were clearly advanced on the original briefing and argument of this appeal. Both of the judges who joined in the decision of this court have voted to deny rehearing before the division which decided the appeal. Less than a majority of the circuit judges now in regular active service have voted for rehearing before the court in banc. Judge Maris, having retired from regular active service since he joined in the disposition of this appeal, has voted only on the question of rehearing before the division which decided the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is denied.