Court Opinion

ID: 4517455
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-18 18:00:20.352771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:25.199237
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-50716      Document: 00515348925         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/18/2020

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                       March 18, 2020
                                    No. 19-50716
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Conference Calendar                        Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IRVING ANTONIO ADAME-ADAME,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:19-CR-76-3

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Irving Antonio Adame-Adame has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Adame-Adame has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-50716    Document: 00515348925    Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/18/2020

                                No. 19-50716

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2