Court Opinion

ID: 9815809
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 02:26:53.667606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:33.531686
License: Public Domain

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Feb. 15, 1995
The petitions for rehearing filed by appellants Saidel, Paone, and Philadelphia Housing Authority in the above-entitled cases having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petitions for rehearing are denied.
Judge Garth would grant panel rehearing for the reasons stated in his panel dissent.