Court Opinion

ID: 9661049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 22:27:48.755324+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:24.978505
License: Public Domain

SHAW, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result.
Although I do not agree with all the language and reasoning in the main opin*1190ion, I do agree with the following holdings: that William Lyle Marshall must be resen-tenced in accordance with this Court’s opinion in Hankins v. State, 989 So.2d 610 (Ala.Crim.App.2007); that a circuit court has jurisdiction to sentence a defendant for a conviction of driving under the influence regardless of whether the sentence is a felony sentence or a misdemeanor sentence; and that Dutton v. State, 807 So.2d 596 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), Davis v. State, 806 So.2d 404 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), and State v. Shaver, 816 So.2d 88 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), should be overrated. In all other respects, I concur only in the result.