Court Opinion

ID: 1003602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:28:55.667712+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:27.095160
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7487

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CURTIS LEE O’NEAL,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-93-40, CA-00-26-5-2-V)

Submitted:   February 8, 2001          Decided:     February 14, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lee O’Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Curtis Lee O’Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. O’Neal, CR-93-40; CA-00-26-5-

2-V (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 18, 2000; entered Sept. 19, 2000).     We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2