Court Opinion

ID: 2781554
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-24 19:01:09.189871+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:26.476733
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-10670      Document: 00512946032         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/24/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 14-10670
                                                                               FILED
                                                                        February 24, 2015
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTIN WYATT LACKEY,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:13-CR-81-8

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Justin Wyatt Lackey has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Lackey has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-10670      Document: 00512946032   Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/24/2015

                                 No. 14-10670

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2