Court Opinion

ID: 7122133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 12:54:03.289387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:08.659499
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garver, J.:
The plaintiffs in error were sureties upon a bond given by one M. P. Abbott to defendant in error, conditioned for the faithful performance by the said Abbott of his duties as general state agent in Kansas for said insurance company. In an action brought on the bond against the principal and sureties, for alleged breaches thereof, trial was had in the district court of Dickinson county and a joint judgment for $925 rendered against M. P. Abbott as principal and the plaintiffs in error as his sureties. This *709proceeding in error to reverse such judgment is brought by the sureties alone, the said M. P. Abbott not being made a party in this court.
Objection is made by defendant in error, in the brief and on oral argument, to a consideration of the errors assigned, for the reason that M. P. Abbott is a necessary party to this proceeding before any reversal of the judgment can be had. We think this objection is well founded. The rule is well settled, and is of universal application, that all the parties to a joint judgment must be made parties to a petition in error, and a failure in this respect is fatal for the appealing party. (McPherson v. Storch, 49 Kan. 313, and cases cited; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416 ; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 id. 152, 157.)
Notwithstanding this objection, we have examined the errors assigned, and are of the opinion that no reversible error was committed. The case will be dismissed.
All the Judges concurring.