Court Opinion

ID: 8154380
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:38:45.79574+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:36.401772
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1). Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495; 521-523; Thomas v. Gay, 169 U. S. 264, 278-280; Cincinnati *613Soap Co. v. United States, 301 U. S. 308, 313; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 584-587; (2) Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Missouri Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205, 209; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, supra, at pp. 578-579.
Messrs. Stuart S. Janney and Frank B. Ober for appellant. Messrs. William C. Walsh, Wm. L. Henderson, and Randolph Barton, Jr. for appellees.