Court Opinion

ID: 717287
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 07:09:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:46.773479
License: Public Domain

82 F.3d 424
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mercedes Josefina ZAVALA-DE MARADIAGA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-50223.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 26, 1996.*Decided April 1, 1996.

Before:  GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Mercedes Josefina Zavala-De Maradiaga appeals her sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following her guilty plea to importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a)(1).   Zavala De-Mariaga's counsel, the Federal Public Defender, has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.   Because our independent review of the record discloses no meritorious issues for review, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is

3
AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3