Court Opinion

ID: 9667596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 01:50:23.65789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:39.246385
License: Public Domain

Beasley, J.
(concurring). I respectfully concur in the result reached by the majority.
However, I do not believe that the Supreme Court intended to reverse long-standing precedent and to resolve the substantial differences of opinion regarding impeachment of credibility of witnesses by evidence of conviction of an unspecified *286felony in the four-sentence peremptory order in response to application for leave to appeal in People v VanDorsten.1 See, People v Huff.2

 409 Mich 942; 298 NW2d 421 (1980).

 101 Mich App 232; 300 NW2d 525 (1980). •