Court Opinion

ID: 9626454
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 08:12:41.749834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:48.992532
License: Public Domain

CRAIL, J., Dissenting.
I dissent. The evidence upon which plaintiff relies is referred to in appellants’ brief, pages 14 to 30, inclusive, and is supported by citations to the reporter’s transcript. In my opinion there is evidence a plenty to sustain the inference that the use of the truck by the defendant Doyle was with the implied consent of the defendant Reo Dennis Company, Inc. The judgment should be reversed to the end that the cause may be determined upon its merits. I think this is in accord with our holding in the case of Boland v. Gosser, 5 Cal. App. (2d) 700 [43 Pac. (2d) 559].
A petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on June 18, 1935.