Court Opinion

ID: 4112157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-29 18:09:58.940539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:12.035024
License: Public Domain

People v Rose (2016 NY Slip Op 08940)

People v Rose

2016 NY Slip Op 08940

Decided on December 29, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 29, 2016

Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Saxe, Gische, JJ.

2552 8207/87

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vNate Rose, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David P. Stromes of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered September 17, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument
or outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime and defendant's violent criminal history.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 29, 2016
CLERK