Court Opinion

ID: 1441248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:10:35.176619+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:45:15.116309
License: Public Domain

235 S.W.3d 591 (2007)
Michael LEWIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88989.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
October 16, 2007.
Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lewis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *592 error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).