Court Opinion

ID: 9369591
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-09 14:07:49.241818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:16.130690
License: Public Domain

State of New York
Court of Appeals
                                                            This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to
                                                          revision before publication in the New York Reports.

 No. 29 SSM 19
 Min Zhong,
         Appellant,
      v.
 Peter J. Matranga,
         Respondent.

 Submitted by Brian J. Isaac, for appellant.
 Submitted by Arlene E. Lewis, for respondent.

 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with
 costs. In response to defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to summary
 judgment, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of material fact (see Heltz v Barratt, 24
 NY3d 1185, 1187 [2014]; Green v Mower, 100 NY2d 529, 530 [2003]). Acting Chief
 Judge Cannataro and Judges Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Troutman concur. Judge Rivera
 dissents and votes to reverse and deny defendant's motion for summary judgment, for
 reasons stated in so much of the dissenting opinion by Justice Peter H. Moulton as
 concluded that, assuming defendant made out a prima facie case in support of his motion
 for summary judgment, plaintiff raised triable issues of material fact warranting denial of
 the motion (see Min Zhong v Matranga, 208 AD3d 439, 444-445 [Moulton, J.
 dissenting]).

 Decided February 9, 2023