Court Opinion

ID: 1449154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:13:06.302724+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:57.728660
License: Public Domain

249 S.W.3d 241 (2008)
Demetrius TAYLOR, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90142.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 1, 2008.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW and KURT S. ODENWALD, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Demetrius Taylor, appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order and judgment denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion *242 for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).