Court Opinion

ID: 6142413
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:42:36.718579+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:42.184284
License: Public Domain

The Circuit Judge:

The question presented by the counsel is, what is meant by the language of the statute, that the debtor will, within thirty days,, apply for an assignment and his discharge %
The fourteenth section enacts that fourteen days’ notice shall be given of the time, and place, and officer to whom the petition will be presented, so that if the construction contended for by the opposing creditors is correct, the debtor has but sixteen days from giving the bond to make out his papers and give his notice, and he must at all events present his petition to the officer within the thirty days.
■ If the debtor should, within the sixteen days, make out and serve his papers, and on the appointed day the officer should be absent, and continue so until after the expiration of the thirty days, the debtor would, without any fault on his part, and upon an event which he could not control, not only be deprived of all opportunity of obtaining his discharge, but be liable to have his bond forfeited.
But, however proper it might be, under the provisions of the statute, to declare the bond forfeited because the application was not made within the thirty days, I do not find anything in the act which deprives the debtor of bis opportunity of being discharged in such an event.
The twelfth section says that any person who has given such a bond, may present a petition praying that his property may be assigned, and that he may have the benefit of the act, but does not say that he shall do so within any given time. So that, although he may delay making his application to such a time as to work a forfeiture of his bond, yet I do not discover any thing which forbids his making the application at any time, nor any thing which forbids the officer entertaining his application whenever it may be made. The condition of the bond is one thing, and the jurisdiction of the officer, in no respect depending on the performance of the condition of the bond, is another.
The right to make the application is founded on the fact of *264the defendant having given the bond, not on the fact that he has performed the- condition of it.
And, as his petition sets forth that he has given the bond required, it states all that, under the circumstances, is necessary to "entitle him to.make the application, or to give me jurisdiction.
Objections overruled.