Court Opinion

ID: 7212278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 21:55:31.701285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:53.298790
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Ronald Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. Virginia, No. CA-00-966-7 (W.D.Va. May 6, 2002). We deny Wilson’s motion for appointment of counsel as this matter involves no complex issues or exceptional circumstances. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.