Court Opinion

ID: 7431126
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:53:40.604798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:28.361505
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida In*6dustrial Commission bearing date October 16, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.
Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent-Carl W. Whitta-ker’s attorney.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.