Court Opinion

ID: 9588809
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:39:02.479596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:54:03.499908
License: Public Domain

Carrico, J.,
concurring.
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Poif, but only to the extent that it assumes a property interest in the expectation of continued compensation benefits and then holds that due process requirements are satisfied by the pretermination and post-termination procedures applicable in this case. I do not wish my concurrence, however, to be construed as agreement with the proposition that there exists a property interest in the expectation of continued compensation benefits. Indeed, I strongly disagree with that proposition.
Harrison, Cochran, and Compton, JJ., join in this concurring opinion.