Court Opinion

ID: 160323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 06:42:31+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:58.158413
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Tenth Circuit
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                             OCT 30 2000
                                 TENTH CIRCUIT
                            __________________________                   PATRICK FISHER
                                                                                  Clerk

 JAMES A. MIERITZ,

          Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.                                                        No. 00-2148
                                                            (D. N.M.)
 JOE WILLIAMS, Warden, Lea County               (D.Ct. No. CIV-00-197-MV/WWD)
 Correctional Facility; GARY JOHNSON,
 Governor, State of New Mexico;
 ROBERT PERRY, Secretary of
 Corrections; NEW MEXICO
 CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, State
 of New Mexico; WACKENHUT
 CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, a
 Florida corporation; LEA COUNTY,
 NEW MEXICO; ATTORNEY
 GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW
 MEXICO,

          Defendants-Appellees.
                        ____________________________

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY, KELLY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

      *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
      After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

      Appellant James Mieritz, a state inmate appearing pro se, appeals the

district court’s decision denying his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 for failure to exhaust existing state remedies. The facts and issues in this

case are identical to those in Rael v. Williams, 2000 WL 1051845 (10th Cir. July

31, 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Oct. 10, 2000) (No. 00-6587). Thus, our

decision is governed by this court’s analysis and conclusions therein.

      Accordingly, we grant Mr. Mieritz a certificate of appealability and

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court, as modified, to dismiss the claim

cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 with prejudice; all other claims contained in

Mr. Mieritz’s petition are dismissed without prejudice.

                                       Entered by the Court:

                                       WADE BRORBY
                                       United States Circuit Judge

                                         -2-