Court Opinion

ID: 9384709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-04 19:02:09.920468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:56.053977
License: Public Domain

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
 UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
                 AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

                                    IN THE
             ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
                                DIVISION ONE

                     STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

                                        v.

                         URIAN YOUNG, Petitioner.

                         No. 1 CA-CR 22-0532 PRPC
                              FILED 4-4-2023

    Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
                           No. CR1994-010928
                  The Honorable Scott S. Minder, Judge

                  REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

                                   COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
By Krista Wood
Counsel for Respondent

Urian Young, San Luis
Petitioner
                             STATE v. YOUNG
                            Decision of the Court

                       MEMORANDUM DECISION

Acting Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Michael S. Catlett and
Judge Anni Hill Foster delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1            Petitioner Urian Young seeks review of the superior court’s
order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s
fourth petition.

¶2             Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to
show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition
for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011)
(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3             We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief, and the
petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.

¶4            We grant review and deny relief.

                             AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
                             FILED: AA

                                          2