Court Opinion

ID: 3121922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:15:40.687952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:17.270585
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-09-00454-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
RON ST. JOHN, SENOVIO
RAMIREZ AND 
BRAVO STEEL PRODUCTS,
INC.,                                          Appellants,
 
                                                             v.
 
ABRAHAM BAKSHT,                                                                     Appellee.

____________________________________________________________
 
                           On
appeal from the 370th District Court 
                                       of
Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                     Before Justices
Yañez, Garza, and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellants,
Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez, and Bravo Steel Products, Inc., perfected an
appeal from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County,
Texas, in cause number C-4725-99-G.  Appellants have filed a motion for
voluntary dismissal of their appeal on grounds that appellants no longer desire
to pursue their appeal.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal, is of
the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the
appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. 
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 
7th day of October, 2010.