Court Opinion

ID: 3935492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:00:09.564877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:11.106703
License: Public Domain

The offense is burglary of a private residence at night, the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for five years.
The indictment charges that appellant entered the private residence of Mrs. J. G. Snyder at night by force, threats and fraud, with the intent to commit the offense of theft.
The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. It was undisputed that the burglarized residence was occupied, at the time of the burglary, by Mrs. J. C. Snyder and her husband, Albert Snyder; Mrs. Snyder testified that the house belonged to her husband; that he was the head of the family, and had the care, control and management of the house. *Page 344 
The proof fails to correspond with the allegation of occupancy and ownership. The indictment should have charged occupancy and ownership in the husband. In the case of Hall v. State, 287 S.W. 244, the rule is stated as follows:
"The statute requires that the owner or possessor of the property be named in the indictment, and, where property is in joint possession of the husband and wife, living together, and occupying the same premises, the husband should be named as the possessor and owner."
There are circumstances under which it is proper to charge the ownership in the wife. The facts of the present case, however, do not bring it within any of the exceptions.
See Peoples v. State, 234 S.W. 394, and authorities there cited.
We do not deem it necessary to discuss the other matters complained of by appellant.
Because the proof fails to correspond with the allegation, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.