Court Opinion

ID: 6701067
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 22:09:19.549546+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:25.228512
License: Public Domain

PER Cuelam.
There was plenary evidence that defendant intentionally shot Blumell on December 6, 1963, between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m., on Roxboro Street (near its intersection with Canal Street) in Durham, North Carolina, and that Blumell died at Duke Hospital on December 7, 1963, at 12:45 a.m., as the result of bullet wound (s) so inflicted.
*248Upon the evidence and instructions, whether defendant was guilty of murder in the second degree, or guilty of manslaughter, or not guilty, was submitted for jury determination. The evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict. A full and careful consideration of the record discloses no error prejudicial to defendant. The court instructed the jury fully as to all legal principles and contentions favorable to defendant. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.
Defendant, an indigent, was represented in the superior court by two court-appointed counsel. After trial and conviction, defendant requested that said counsel be discharged and that the court appoint other counsel to prosecute his appeal. Under these circumstances, the court permitted said court-appointed trial counsel to withdraw and appointed Marshall T. Spears, Jr., Esquire, as counsel for defendant to perfect and prosecute his appeal. Mr. Spears has served only as appellate counsel.
No error.