Court Opinion

ID: 539523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:04:48+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:44.138163
License: Public Domain

900 F.2d 255Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Carroll Eugene STRADER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Joseph L. HAMILTON;  Sam Boyd;  Samuel A. Wilson, III;Louis R. Columbo;  Wanda J. Garrett;  Jeffrey T. Ledbetter;A. Leon Stanback, Jr.;  Bob Wall;  H.D. Akins;  V. King;State of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
NO. 89-6415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 1990.Decided March 14, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury.  Richard C. Erwin, Chief District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-180-S).
Carroll Eugene Strader, appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Carroll Eugene Strader appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Strader v. Hamilton, CA-89-180-S (M.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1989).

2
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED