Court Opinion

ID: 8439792
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:38:27.630901+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.591252
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kendrick V. Alston appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s order denying discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Winthrop Univ. Police Dep’t, No. 8:09-cv-01130-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2010); 2011 WL 127204 (Jan. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.