Court Opinion

ID: 9834117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:18:31.257924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:11.684218
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
On motion for rehearing in this case, appellees allege that in our summary of the testimony of Mrs. B. F. Whitworth we misquoted the facts testified to by her. We have again carefplly examined her testimony as recorded in the statement of facts and think that its substance is fairly stated in the opinion. On the issue to which her testimony relates, we made the express finding as follows: “Theré is no-entry on the judge’s probate docket, nor-recorded in the probate minutes, of an order making the temporary guardianship permanent. The notice as provided by article 4137 and the sheriff’s returns thereon are not recorded in the probate minutes.” This finding is all that’ appellees claim the evidence showed. But to eliminate any question of doing violence to the facts of appellees’ cause or to the testimony of Mrs. Whitworth, the following language is stricken from our summary of the testimony of Mrs. Whitworth appearing in the original opinion; namely: “ * * * And could not say but that some of them may contain a record of other matters in said-guardianship.”
The motion for rehearing is overruled.