Court Opinion

ID: 2927162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:48:02.55437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:39.626562
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00141-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE:  FRIZO VALERO
 

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition
 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

	Relator, Frizo Valero, has filed a petition for writ of prohibition by which he requests
that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Elia Cornejo Lopez, presiding judge of the
404th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, to vacate her January 28, 2009
order granting the State's "Motion for Reconsideration and to Void Orders Modifying
Probation Judgment and Dismissing Charges."  On March 17, 2009, we requested the real
party in interest, the State of Texas, by and through the Criminal District Attorney in and
for Cameron County, Texas, to file a response to relator's petition.  The State filed a
response on March 31, 2009.
	Having reviewed and fully considered the relator's petition for writ of prohibition and
the State's response thereto, this Court is of the opinion that the relator is not entitled to
the relief sought and that the petition should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 
Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is DENIED.

								PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum opinion delivered and 
filed this the 1st day of April, 2009.
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) ("When
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.")