Court Opinion

ID: 4502458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-29 11:15:01.787777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:11.359618
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                  No. 06-19-00148-CR

     QUANTEL RAYSHON WAGGONER, Appellant

                           V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

         On Appeal from the 7th District Court
                 Smith County, Texas
             Trial Court No. 007-1699-18

      Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
                                           ORDER
       Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.”

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b)

states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the

contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

       Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the

clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in

accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      BY THE COURT

Date: January 28, 2020

                                                  2