Court Opinion

ID: 2847349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 20:25:55.103962+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:55:04.427264
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-001-CV

KHALED OMAR	APPELLANT

V.

ZIPCO, INC.	APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 342
ND
 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM
 
OPINION
(footnote: 1) 
AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  
See 
T
EX.
 R. A
PP.
 P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

         DELIVERED: January 29, 2004	  

FOOTNOTES
1:See 
Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.