Court Opinion

ID: 1026842
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:13:06.910083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:21.626025
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  James Niblock appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Niblock,
  
  No. l:02-cr00568-GBL-l (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.