Court Opinion

ID: 5044934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 07:12:04.923816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:07:39.337119
License: Public Domain

OPINION
The offense is felony theft; the punishment, two years.
Appellant pled guilty and entered into a written agreement to stipulate. On appeal appellant contends that his judicial confession was insufficient because it failed to recite that the appellant intended to appropriate the stolen property to the use and benefit of the appellant. The written stipulation, which appellant testified was substantially true and correct, contains no recitation of appellant's intent to appropriate, which is an essential element of the offense denounced by Art. 1410, V.A.P.C.1
The evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 421.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
DOUGLAS, J., not participating.
1 Art. 1410, supra, reads as follows:
"Theft' is the fraudulent taking of corporeal personal property belonging to another from his possession, or from the possession of some person holding the same for him, without his consent, with intent to deprive the owner of the value of the same, and To appropriate it to the use or benefit of the person taking.' (Emphasis added)