Court Opinion

ID: 5629535
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 05:14:10.667777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:44.891437
License: Public Domain

Townsend, J.
A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (73 S. E. 2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 (73 S. E. 2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 (73 S. E. 2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 (81 S. E. 2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App. 494 (1b) (86 S. E. 2d 329). It follows that the writ of error to a judgment overruling general and special demurrers and allowing the plaintiff fifteen days for amendment is premature and must be

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.