Court Opinion

ID: 835420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 21:11:02.39756+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:23.212353
License: Public Domain

*47
   
  PER CURIAM
 

  Petitioners challenge the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 49 (2008). ORS 250.085(5). Initiative Petition 49, if adopted, would modify Oregon law regarding union security agreements.
 

  The text of Initiative Petition 49 is virtually identical to the text of Initiative Petition 48 (2008). The Attorney General certified identical ballot titles for Initiative Petitions 48 and 49.
 

  We decided a ballot title challenge regarding Initiative Petition 48 in
  
   Sizemore/Terhune v. Myers,
  
  342 Or 578, 157 P3d 188 (2007). In that case, petitioners’ and the Attorney General’s arguments regarding the ballot title were identical to those that they submit here. This court concluded in
  
   Sizemore
  
  that the Attorney General’s ballot title for Initiative Petition 48 required modification on referral.
 

  For the reasons stated in
  
   Sizemore,
  
  the Attorney General’s certified ballot title in this proceeding does not comply substantially with statutory requirements and requires modification on referral. ORS 250.085(8).
 

  Ballot title referred to the Attorney General for modification.