Court Opinion

ID: 721151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 08:04:54+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:50.052957
License: Public Domain

87 F.3d 1325
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joseph Frank ROWE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-50049.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 11, 1996.*Decided June 14, 1996.

Before:  CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR. and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Joseph Frank Rowe appeals his jury conviction and the sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence.   Counsel for Rowe filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified no issues for appellate review, and Rowe has not filed a supplemental pro se brief raising any issues.

3
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.   Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.   Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3