Court Opinion

ID: 9844635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:05:50.298748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:39.413823
License: Public Domain

SIMMS, Justice,
concurring specially:
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that this appeal is untimely and should be dismissed, but I find it unnecessary to speculate about the efficacy of the motion for rehearing and the validity of the Commission’s ensuing modification of its previous order. Even if the order of December 22, 1995, effected a valid modification of the first order, this appeal, filed on February 14,1996, was untimely and the matter should simply be dismissed by order.
I am authorized to state that Justice Watt joins with me in the views expressed herein.