Court Opinion

ID: 9401796
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-14 06:08:37.071286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:55.332529
License: Public Domain

DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 8, 2023

                                   S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00453-CV

                    TITO E. MARRERO, Appellant
                               V.
                ATTORNEY MICHAEL CRAMER, Appellee

               On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-15862

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
      Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Goldstein
                         Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
      Before the Court is appellant’s June 5, 2023 motion to withdraw his appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

                                          /Robert D. Burns, III/
                                          ROBERT D. BURNS, III
                                          CHIEF JUSTICE

230453F.P05
                                  S
                           Court of Appeals
                    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                 JUDGMENT

TITO E. MARRERO, Appellant                  On Appeal from the 134th Judicial
                                            District Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-23-00453-CV         V.               Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-15862.
                                            Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
ATTORNEY MICHAEL CRAMER,                    Burns, Justices Pedersen, III and
Appellee                                    Goldstein participating.

      In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

       We ORDER that appellee Attorney Michael Cramer recover his costs, if any,
of this appeal from appellant Tito E. Marrero.

Judgment entered June 8, 2023

                                      –2–