Court Opinion

ID: 8055479
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:32:19.091878+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:37:49.770758
License: Public Domain

By the Court.
— We all think the court below erred; that the testimony offered would have been sufficient, if proved, to establish the bill of particulars, circumstanced as this case was; the bill of particulars produced, being in the handwriting of the plaintiff’s attorney, and signed by him, the bill having [*] been given, is evidence of itself, of its having been required.
Let the judgment be reversed, and in case a venire de novo should' be moved, the plaintiff, if he requires it, may have leave to amend the bill of particulars.? — Time being given plead de novo, if required.