Court Opinion

ID: 3095379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:29:18.845695+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:59.473239
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-11-00748-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ALICIA OLABARRIETA AND                                                   APPELLANTS,
ADALBERTO OLABARRIETA,

                                             v.

COMPASS BANK,                                     APPELLEE.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 206th District Court
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on April 12, 2012. On April 23,

2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the
Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not

significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellants.

       Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                   PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
7th day of June, 2012.

                                               2