Court Opinion

ID: 2719188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-20 07:04:55.732844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:35:16.490282
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                        JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 20, 2014

                                     NO. 03-12-00553-CR

                                  Johnny Esparza, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

     APPEAL FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
     BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
 MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the trial court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant pleaded not true

to the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment and to reflect that the jury found that two of the

enhancement allegations in the indictment were true. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.