Court Opinion

ID: 1005270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:54:14.418891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:31.036167
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

SHERRIE MORTON BURGESS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-97-18, CA-00-990-1)

Submitted:   September 6, 2001        Decided:   September 14, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherrie Morton Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Sherrie Morton Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.     See United States v. Burgess, Nos. CR-97-18; CA-00-990-1

(M.D.N.C. June 18, 2001).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2