Court Opinion

ID: 989334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:05:33.0854+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:20.854096
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7836

DAVID S. COUSINS,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JAMES WILDER,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-95-779-5-H)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                  Decided:   May 21, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David S. Cousins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Cousins v. Wilder, No. CA-95-779-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7,
1995). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2