Court Opinion

ID: 2733236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-16 16:01:12.217451+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:23:56.776635
License: Public Domain

UNI'(I`F.`D S'I`A'I`I;'LS DIS'I`RICT COURT
F()R TI~IIE l)IS"i`RIC"l` OF COLUMBIA

)
SJ:`_~ICLJRl'I`IIZIS INDU STRY AND I*`INANCI/-\Ii `)
MARKI;S'I`S ASSOCIA'}`I(`)N, er ci/., )
)
Plaiiitit`t`s, )
)

v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1916 (PL]`*`)
)
UNITEl) S'i`A'ii`li:fS C()MMODI'I`Y FU"!`U`RIES )
TRADING COMMISSION, )
)
De'i"eiidaiit. )
)
()RDER

For the reasons set forth in the ()pinion issued this saine day [Dkt. No. 58], it is
hereby

()Rl)l§')l{l`;`ll`) that defendant’s inotion to dismiss [Dkt. No. 28] is GILANTED in
part and Di§_“€Nli§*jD in part; it is

FUR'if`I--IIEI{ ()RIV)IV;YRI£I) that platintiffs’ claims relating to the Process ibr a
Desigiiated Coiitract Market or Swap ll€xectitioii Facility To i\/lake a Swap Avaiiable to 'l`r‘ade,
Swap 'I`raiisaetioii Coiiipliaiice and innpleiiieritatioii Scheduie, and 'I`rade Exeeution Requireiiient
Un.dei' the Coniniodity l?lxchaiige Act (""l"rade Exeeution Rtile"), 78 Fed. Reg. 33606 (June 4,
2()13), are DlSMlSSllil) WI'l`l'IOli'l` PR]F)JIJDICIE for lack of standing; it is

i*`UR'l`i--IIY;EI{ ORDIV_~`.R!§§L) that piairitii"i"s’ motion for suinmary judgment [Dkt. No.
2}_'] is GIKAN"]`}EI) in part and Dl§iNIl§i]i) in part; it is

Flll?."l`l‘il§§l{ C)RI)IFIRIT£L) that defi`