Court Opinion

ID: 1014874
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:24:03.522852+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:00.559625
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 04-7212

NATHAN J. YANCEY, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. W. JOHNSON, Sergeant; D. SMITH, Assistant
Warden; D. T. MAHON, Warden,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-1081-AM)

Submitted:   November 18, 2004         Decided:     November 30, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan J. Yancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Nathan J. Yancey, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.    We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.   See Yancey v.

Johnson, No. CA-03-1081-AM (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2004; entered

July 12, 2004).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                               - 2 -