Court Opinion

ID: 8446338
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 22:34:34.485273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:55.241506
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Beant Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) opinion which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.
Where, as here, the BIA affirms without an opinion, we review the IJ’s decision directly. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003). We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination. Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001).
The IJ’s adverse credibility determination relied upon minor inconsistencies that do not go to the heart of Singh’s claim. See id. at 1043; see also Bandari v. INS, 227 F.3d 1160, 1165-68 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the IJ’s adverse credibility determination is not supported by substantial evidence. See Bandari, 227 F.3d at 1165—66.
We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings to determine whether, accepting Singh’s testimony as credible, he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED.

 This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.