Court Opinion

ID: 4679246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-21 00:00:19.881181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:49.731626
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-10006      Document: 00515829325         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/20/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                 United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            April 20, 2021
                                  No. 20-10006                             Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Ernest Macias, III,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:19-CR-74-1

   Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernest Macias,
   III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Macias has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10006     Document: 00515829325          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/20/2021

                                   No. 20-10006

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2