Court Opinion

ID: 9754262
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 19:52:27.20781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:27:51.091390
License: Public Domain

JOHN C. ELDRIDGE (Retired, Specially Assigned),
dissenting.
In this case, I would impose a sanction of an indefinite suspension rather than disbarment. Among this Court’s prior attorney grievance cases, the present case is most similar to Attorney Grievance Commission v. Potter, 380 Md. 128, 844 A.2d 367 (2004), in which the Court unanimously imposed a ninety-day suspension. The facts of the present case are not significantly different from the facts in Potter. The imposition of a suspension in the case at bar would comport with consistency and a respect for precedent.
Chief Judge BELL and Judge MURPHY join this dissenting opinion.