Court Opinion

ID: 5617052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:21:43.462612+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:17.038906
License: Public Domain

Bloodwortii, J.
1. The court did not err in any of the rulings relating to the pleadings, of which error is alleged in the exceptions pendente lite.
*138Decided June 9, 1925.
Rehearing denied July 14, 1925.
W. I. & P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error.
J. Q. Hale, contra.
2. None of fclie special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows any reason why. the judgment of the trial court should be reversed.
3'. A verdict for the full amount sued for was properly directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.