Court Opinion

ID: 9397988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-27 21:00:43.935032+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:29.335692
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6233      Doc: 9         Filed: 05/26/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6233

        MALCOLM A. JORDAN,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        JORDAN FLY,

                             Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03013-BO-RJ)

        Submitted: May 23, 2023                                             Decided: May 26, 2023

        Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Malcolm A. Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6233      Doc: 9        Filed: 05/26/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Malcom A. Jordan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for

        failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order directing Jordan to correct certain

        deficiencies in his complaint. Although the magistrate judge warned Jordan that failure to

        comply could result in the dismissal of his action, Jordan did not remedy the identified

        deficiencies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s order. Jordan v. Fly, No. 5:23-ct-03013-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. signed

        Feb. 23 & entered Feb. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

        legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

        would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2