Court Opinion

ID: 9686235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:35:12.4974+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:16.450616
License: Public Domain

On Second Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
The State, after the granting of the first rehearing and the resultant opinion, asked the following question in brief:
“1. Under the opinion rendered by the majority of this Court on February 13, 1964, is the Court’s holding limited to leased trucks used to haul exclusively the lessee’s own property or does it extend to all leased trucks, including leased trucks used by the lessee to haul property belonging to others for compensation ?”
The majority of the Court thinks that the opinion on rehearing is clear that the holding of the majority was limited to leased trucks used to haul exclusively the lessee’s own property. For emphasis, we reiterate that such is the holding.
Opinion extended and application for rehearing overruled.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.