Court Opinion

ID: 990055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:15:49.820451+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:31.729541
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6063

FRANKLIN HEWITT,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

DOCTOR FENDER,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-95-667-0-19)

Submitted:   July 25, 1996                 Decided:   August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Hewitt, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Hewitt v. Fender, No. CA-95-667-0-19 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2