Court Opinion

ID: 4403399
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-06-05 13:48:45.207122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:24.888600
License: Public Domain

In The
                               Court of Appeals
                      Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                    No. 07-19-00143-CR

                    ROBERT KITCHENS A/K/A ROBERT BAREFIELD
                       A/K/A ROBERT BARFIELD, APPELLANT

                                             V.

                           THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                            On Appeal from the 320th District Court
                                     Potter County, Texas
               Trial Court No. 75,086-D-CR, Honorable David Gleason, Presiding

                                       June 3, 2019

                     ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                      Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

       Appellant, Robert Kitchens a/k/a Robert Barefield a/k/a Robert Barfield, appeals

his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram,1

enhanced, and sentence of twelve years’ confinement. The trial court’s certification of

appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal

and that appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

       1   TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (West 2017).
However, the judgment indicates that appellant pled guilty to the offense pursuant to an

open plea, not a plea bargain. The record also includes a plea memorandum containing

a “Waiver of Appeal” signed by appellant. Although the waiver states that appellant

agreed to waive his right of appeal “as a part of this plea bargain agreement,” the plea

memorandum indicates that there was “No Plea Agreement.”

       Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the

cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived

his right of appeal. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 621 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

The trial court shall also prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal

consistent with the record and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on these

matters. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial court’s certification

comports to the record).      The amended certification and the findings of fact and

conclusions of law shall be included in a clerk’s record to be filed with this court by July

3, 2019.

       It is so ordered.

                                                         Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                             2