Court Opinion

ID: 9740461
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:36:01.442608+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:16.459512
License: Public Domain

White and Shanahan, JJ.,
concurring.
We concur only for a reason not discussed by the majority.
The trial court found as a matter of law that the appellees were lessees of that part of the appellant’s land where the Dyfonate was located. The appellant contends that the site of the Dyfonate is outside the area leased to the appellees. There was evidence to support appellant’s assertion. The relationship of the parties determines the rights and duties arising from the use or occupancy of the land. The nature of the relationship should have been submitted to the jury, and it was error not to do so.