Court Opinion

ID: 9891426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-18 16:04:44.654318+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.693624
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    ISAIAS R. ORTIZ,                            §
                                                § No. 230, 2023
           Defendant Below,                     §
           Appellant,                           § Court Below–Superior Court
                                                § of the State of Delaware
           v.                                   §
                                                § Cr. ID No. 0210012072 (N)
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                          §
                                                §
           Appellee.                            §

                               Submitted: August 7, 2023
                               Decided:   October 17, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

                                            ORDER

         After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to

affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its

June 6, 2023 order denying the appellant’s third motion for correction of an illegal

sentence.1

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

                                      BY THE COURT:

                                      /s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
                                      Justice

1
    State v. Ortiz, 2023 WL 3861887 (Del. Super. June 6, 2023).