Court Opinion

ID: 9518601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:57:04.566963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:43.430905
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
In his petition for rehearing, Glasscock points out an error in our opinion regarding whether a dispute over the accuracy of the lab report was raised at trial. In the first paragraph of Issue Two, we stated, "Glas-scock disputed the accuracy of the lab report." Slip op. at 5. "Disputed" is a typographical error, which we now correct and change to "disputes". This correction reflects that on appeal, Glasscock disputes *605the accuracy of the transcription of the lab report. Although Glasscock challenged the accuracy of the test at trial, he did not contend that the results were transcribed inaccurately onto the lab report. Because the accuracy of transeription of the lab report was not in dispute at trial, the admission into evidence of the lab report, although it was not the best evidence, was harmless error.
Rehearing denied.
GARRARD, J., concurs.
BAKER, J., concurs in result with separate opinion.