Court Opinion

ID: 59609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 03:23:20+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:37.270980
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                      ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                            March 31, 2008
                             No. 07-14909                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                         Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                       ________________________

                   D. C. Docket No. 07-00007-CR-SPM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

RODERICK KENNETH WIMS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Florida
                      _________________________

                             (March 31, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Roderick Kenenth Wims on this direct

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief

prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wims’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

                                          2