Court Opinion

ID: 9722955
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 09:58:14.689382+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:15:54.071218
License: Public Domain

Carter, J.,
dissenting.
The journal entries committing the two defendants involved in these cases state that their cases come on for final hearing with their fathers personally present in the courtroom. This constitutes an appearance and .a waiver of the service of summons required by section 43-206, R. R. S. 1943. A motion to vacate the order of commitment was filed by the defendants and their respective fathers. It was considered and ruled on by the court. This is undisputable proof of the appearance of the father of each of the minor defendants. The *795record thus made denotes absolute verity and affirmatively shows appearances of the fathers of the defendants. It is a waiver of process and a submission of their persons to the jurisdiction of the court. I submit that the court had jurisdiction of the defendants and that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.