Court Opinion

ID: 4507236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-02-13 17:02:01.541007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:46:17.487479
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 18-1737V
                                         UNPUBLISHED

    LINDSAY ROBERT,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                          Filed: January 7, 2020
    v.
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                              Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
                        Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)

Edward M. Kraus, Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for petitioner.

Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                     RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

       On November 8, 2018, Lindsay Robert filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered
on October 12, 2017. Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

       On January 6, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner’s medical course is consistent

1
  Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as defined by the
Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no recent history of pain, inflammation,
or dysfunction of her right shoulder, pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an
intramuscular vaccination, pain was limited to the shoulder where the vaccine was
administered, and no other condition or abnormality, such as brachial neuritis, has been
identified to explain petitioner’s pain.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that the
medical records establish that “petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition
for more than six months . . . [and] has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation
under the Act.” Id.

       In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                   s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Brian H. Corcoran
                                   Chief Special Master

                                             2