Court Opinion

ID: 8453945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:47:50.245847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.106707
License: Public Domain

*773Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Lamont Starkes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Starkes, No. 3:08-cr-00161-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. May 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.