Court Opinion

ID: 9866386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 11:41:03.773321+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:24.359290
License: Public Domain

Day, J., dissenting.
Unable to concur in the majority opinion, my reasons are *598respectfully submitted. (1) The rule of practice previously promulgated by this court in Jessup v. Davis, 115 Neb. 1, 211 N. W. 190, is not involved here. (2) Even if it were, a judgment is not to be reversed where a trial court follows a rule of practice promulgated by this court under its constitutional powers. The majority opinion takes cognizance of the rule by revoking the rule as of a future date. (3) The evidence as to public liability insurance was admissible here, irrespective of the rule, to show the relation between the various defendants.