Court Opinion

ID: 2131719
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:24:53.835584+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:48.131308
License: Public Domain

70 Mich. App. 349 (1976)
247 N.W.2d 310
PEOPLE
v.
JOHNSON
Docket No. 27172.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided July 16, 1976.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Criminal Division, and Andrea L. Solak, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
*350 Philip J. Caruso (Alvin C. Sallen, of counsel), for defendant on appeal.
Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and W. VAN VALKENBURG,[*] JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully driving away a motor vehicle, MCLA 750.413; MSA 28.645, and receiving stolen property over $100, MCLA 750.535; MSA 28.803. He was sentenced to two concurrent sentences of 2-1/2 to 5 years in prison and appeals as of right.
We cannot consider defendant's argument that the prosecutor failed to endorse and produce alleged res gestae witnesses. Defendant did not request the production of the witnesses prior to or during trial, nor did he move for a new trial. People v Robinson, 390 Mich 629, 634; 213 NW2d 106 (1973). The issue is not preserved for appellate review.
We find no merit in the argument that the trial court erred in failing to obtain defendant's personal consent to the waiver of production of endorsed witnesses. The right of confrontation is not of such moment that it requires waiver by the defendant personally when he is represented by counsel. Such waiver as we have in this case is a trial tactic within the province of counsel. People v Lawrence, 32 Mich App 591, 593; 189 NW2d 48 (1971).
Affirmed.
NOTES
[*]  Former circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.