Court Opinion

ID: 708439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:19:54+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:35.563887
License: Public Domain

70 F.3d 1262
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Lloyd STEVEN LANE, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.MICHAEL EASLEY, Attorney General;  FRANKLIN FREEMAN,Secretary of Correction;  LYNN C. PHILLIPS, Director ofPrisons;  FINESSE G. COUCH, Director of Grievance Committee;JAMES B. HUNT, Governor;  HENRY STEVENS, Lieutenant;  J.R.HUNT, Superintendent;  JOHN WILLIAMS, Programmer;  J.A.DOBBS, Examiner, Grievance Committee;  JAMES L. MILLER,Examiner, Grievance Committee;  MALCOLM DEBNAM, AssistantDirector, Grievance Committee;  WILLIAM A. DUDLEY, FormerDirector, Grievance Committee;  H.L. YOW, AdministrativeStaff;  J.J. CLARK, Superintendent;  RANDALL LEE,Superintendent;  ERNEST SMITH, Designated Hearing Officer,Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-7515.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.Decided Nov. 22, 1995.

Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Lane v. Easley, No. CA-95-670-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED