Court Opinion

ID: 9572771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:44:28.899958+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:14.132869
License: Public Domain

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.
(concurring). I agree that the City of Lansing properly invoked the doctrine of governmental immunity as to the negligence claim and the "attractive nuisance” claim. MCLA 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107). I concur in the application of the doctrine of governmental immunity to the "attractive nuisance” claim solely because "attractive nuisance” is merely another label for negligence. 2 Restatement Torts, 2d, § 339, comment o, p 206, see Lyshak v Detroit, 351 Mich 230; 88 NW2d 596 (1958), Prosser, Torts (4th ed), § 59, pp 364-376.
I vote to affirm.