Court Opinion

ID: 2721192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-27 14:03:24.449291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:39:19.989461
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

                                   No. 13-0385
                              Filed August 27, 2014

STATE OF IOWA,
     Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRANDON DEAN SEXTRO,
     Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________

       Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, John C. Nelson,

District Associate Judge.

       Brandon Sextro appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for

possession of a controlled substance, second offense. AFFIRMED.

       Hannah M. Vellinga of Corbett, Anderson, Corbett, Vellinga & Irvin, L.L.P.,

Sioux City, for appellant.

       Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney

General, Patrick Jennings, County Attorney, and Rachel Rae Edmundson,

Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

       Considered by Doyle, P.J., McDonald, J., and Miller, S.J.*

       *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2013).
                                        2

MILLER, S.J.

      Brandon Sextro appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for

possession of a controlled substance, second offense, in violation of Iowa Code

section 124.401(5) (2013). He contends counsel rendered ineffective assistance

by not filing a motion to suppress (1) physical evidence seized as a result of a

warrantless entry and search of a residence in which he was residing, and (2)

subsequent statements obtained as a result of the unlawful entry.         He also

contends counsel rendered ineffective assistance by allowing his guilty plea to be

accepted without a factual basis in the record and by not filing a motion in arrest

of judgment.

             An ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim in a criminal case
      need not be raised on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings
      in order to preserve the claim for postconviction relief purposes.
      The defendant may raise the ineffective assistance claim on direct
      appeal if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe the record is
      adequate to address the claim on direct appeal. If an ineffective-
      assistance-of-counsel claim is raised on direct appeal from the
      criminal proceedings, we may decide the record is adequate to
      decide the claim or may choose to preserve the claim for
      postconviction proceedings. Only in rare cases will the trial record
      alone be sufficient to resolve the claim on direct appeal.

State v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 133 (Iowa 2006) (citations and quotations

omitted).

      It appears there are no reported proceedings in this case. The record

consists of only the trial information and minutes of evidence, Sextro’s written

plea of guilty, and the court’s sentencing order. We find the record inadequate to
                                           3

review the claims of ineffective assistance.1         We therefore affirm Sextro’s

conviction, but preserve his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for a

possible postconviction proceeding.

       AFFIRMED.

1
  The minutes of evidence appear to provide a factual basis for Sextro’s plea of guilty.
However, the sentencing order makes no finding that a factual basis exists, and the
record gives no indication that the district court considered the minutes of evidence in
accepting the plea of guilty. Sextro’s written plea of guilty also appears to provide a
factual basis. However, Sextro may cogently argue that absent ineffective assistance
concerning the motion to suppress he would not have tendered the guilty plea.