Court Opinion

ID: 8467676
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 10:18:33.840058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.645387
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hugh Epps seeks to appeal a magistrate judge’s order denying without prejudice his “Motion of Filing a Complaint under Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Epps seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.