Court Opinion

ID: 9701108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 22:05:37.094983+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:19.532981
License: Public Domain

STATE       IN THE          INTEREST OF                                                    NO.     2023     KW        0817
A. P. L.

                                                                                         AUGUST        25,        2023

In    Re:           A. P. L.,                        for
                                      applying              supervisory              writs,        City       Court          of
                    East        St.      Tammany,         Parish      of      St.                       No.       23 - JJ -
                                                                                         Tammany,
                    4252.

BEFORE:             WELCH,         HOLDRIDGE,         AND WOLFE,           JJ.

         WRIT NOT           CONSIDERED.              Counsel failed to comply with Uniform
Rules       of    Louisiana              Courts      of    Appeal,         Rules         4- 3          4-   5( C)(
                                                                                                 and                    11),
by    failing to               include        the    notice     of    intent         and        documentation                of
the    return          date.          Counsel        also    failed          to     include        a
                                                                                                       copy       of     the
district          court'       s    ruling,         the   pertinent           court        minutes,          a    motion
for    release (         if any was filed),                  and     the      petition ( if            available).
Although          it     is        not   a    violation         of    the         Uniform        Rules,          we     note
that     counsel            failed       to    include      a   copy of the transcript of                                the
proceeding             at      issue.          See    City      of Baton Rouge  v. Plain,                                433
So. 2d      710 (      La.),        cert.      denied,      464      U. S.        896,     104     S. Ct.        246,        78
L. Ed. 2d        235 (      1983).            Supplementation              of       this        writ   application

and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered.    See
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.
Any future filing on the issue presented herein should include
the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted
above,
        and a copy of this ruling.

                                                           Mm