Court Opinion

ID: 9906740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-05 00:04:25.197309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:52:57.765567
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

              COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JOHNNY     COVINGTON                                                                      NO.      2023 CW     0972

VERSUS

CLARK    SAND       CO.,    INC.;       CLEMCO         INDUSTRIES                    DECEMBER 4,             2023
CORPORATION            F/K/A            CLEMCO           SERVICES
CORP.;     DEPENDABLE            ABRASIVES,         INC.;       E.D.
BULLARD         COMPANY;               EMPIRE            ABRASIVE
EQUIPMENT       COMPANY,          L.P.;         LEHIGH    HANSON,
INC. ( A      SUBSIDIARY          OF    HEIDELBERG            CEMENT
GROUP)        F/K/A       HANSON        AGGREGATES,             INC.
F/K/A    HANSON        AGGREGATES               CENTRAL,        INC.
F/K/A PIONEER          SOUTH          CENTRAL,         INC.    F/K/A
PIONEER         CONCRETE              OF        TEXAS,         INC.;
INGERSOLL-RAND                   CORPORATION;                  LEROI
COMPRESSOR           A/K/A         ROTARY          COMPRESSION
TECHNOLOGIES;               3M        COMPANY;           RUEMELIN
MANUFACTURING               CO.,           INC.;        SANSTORM,
INC.;    BOB    SCHMIDT          MANUFACTURING,                INC. ;
SOUTHERN        SILICA           OF     LOUISIANA,             INC.;
SPECIALTY            SAND             COMPANY;             SULLAIR
COMPRESSOR             CORPORATION;                    AND          TXI
OPERATIONS,          L.P.

In Re:          Empire          Abrasive         Equipment          Company,             L. P.,    applying      for
                supervisory                writs,         19th           Judicial           District         Court,
                Parish of East Baton Rouge,                           No.      649436.

BEFORE:         McCLENDON,             HESTER,      AND MILLER,               JJ.

        WRIT    NOT       CONSIDERED.            The writ          application             failed to      include
a   copy of the           judgment         complained of,                a    copy of the pleadings on
which     the       ruling       was        founded,          and    a       copy     of     pertinent         court
minutes        in    violation              of     Rules       4-5 (C) ( 6),             4-5 (C) ( 8),    and     4-
5 (C) ( 10)    of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

        Supplementation                    of      this        writ           application            and/or       an
application          for    rehearing            will     not       be       considered.          Uniform      Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,                           Rules 2-18.7               and 4-9.

        In    the    event        relator          seeks      to    file       a    new     application        with
this     court,            it    must           contain        all           pertinent            documentation,
including       the        missing          items      noted        herein          and     documentation         to
show     that       the     original            writ    application                was     timely,       and   must
comply with Uniform Rules                        of Louisiana                Courts      of Appeal,       Rule    2-
12.2.    Any    new        application must               be    filed         on    or    before     January      3,
2023,    and must contain a                     copy of this ruling.

                                                              PMc
                                                              CHH
                                                              SMM

COURT    OF APP: J) FIRST                  CIRCUIT

         Q.s
       DEPUTY       CLERK OF          COURT
              FOR THE       COURT