Court Opinion

ID: 1005114
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:51:32.975253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:37.144477
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6326

HOWARD FOGG, SR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MS. GOODWIN, Head Nurse; MS. SAMPSON, LPN;
DOCTOR O’FOGG,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-01-59-2)

Submitted:   June 15, 2001                 Decided:   August 14, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Fogg, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Howard Fogg, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Fogg v. Goodwin, No. CA-01-59-2 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 12, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2