Court Opinion

ID: 9953632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-22 16:08:21.389109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:42.896970
License: Public Domain

@   11         10         0                      Al

STATE       OF LOUISIANA                                                                      NO.    2024     KW    0166

VERSUS

RODERICK              WELLS
                                                                                              MARCH       22,      2024

In    Re:              Roderick             Wells,                        for
                                                          applying                supervisory             writs,        19th
                       Judicial             District        Court,     Parish           of    East       Baton      Rouge,
                      No.     11- 12- 0703.

BEFORE:               MCCLENDON,             HESTER,       AND     MILLER,        JJ.

          WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE.                                      Relator        failed to           include
the districtthecourt' s ruling on his motion to amend and/ or modify
sentence,                             Boykin         transcript,            pertinent               district           court
minutes,              and     any          other     portions        of     the      district            court      record
that        might       support             the     claims                      in
                                                                   raised            the      writ       application.
Supplementation                       of    this     writ    application             and/ or        an    application
for                                                  be
          rehearing              will        not            considered.              See      Uniform         Rules       of
Louisiana              Courts          of    Appeal,        Rules     2- 18. 7 &         4-   9.       In    the       event

relator elects to file a new application with this court,                                                          he may
do    so     without             the
                                         necessity           of
                                                                obtaining a return date.   Any
future       filing              on    this issue           should include the entire contents
of    this        application,
                                              the     missing        items       noted        above,        and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                              PMC
                                                              CHH
                                                              SMM

     RT    OF APPEAL,                 FIRST    CIRCUIT

             UTY CLERK OF COURT
                      FOR THE         COURT