Court Opinion

ID: 7154186
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:05:00.848127+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:12.242628
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Peters :
Appellant having been indicted with Plenty Henderson and Ki West for the murder of Patrick Riley, was in a separate trial found guilty of manslaughter by a jury, and his punishment fixed at fifteen years confinement in the state prison. The court below having overruled his motion for a new trial, and rendered judgment in conformity to the verdict of the jury, he has appealed to this court.
The learned attorneys for appellant insist that the court below, ■ in instructing the jury, erred in failing to state to them in clear and explicit language that the guilt or innocence of appellant was to be determined by that of Plenderson, who was, according to their theory, the principal.
All three of the persons named were indicted as principals, and it is clearly and satisfactorily shown by the evidence that appellant was present and actively participated in the combat. He not only called on Henderson, who perhaps struck the fatal blow, to kill Riley, but struck him with a stone on the head or neck himself, so that if the mortal wound was not inflicted by appellant’s own hand, it was done with his avowed approval, and in anticipation of his own purpose. Instruction No. 3, given by the court on that point, was as favorable to appellant as he was entitled to have it. And after a *357careful examination of the instructions given and refused by the court below, we have been unable to find any error prejudicial to appellant, and as no other grounds are relied upon for reversal except the refusal of instructions asked by appellant, and the giving of some objected to by him, the judgment must be affirmed.

Morton & Parker, Buford, for appellant.

J. W. Rodman, for appellee.