Court Opinion

ID: 5162860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 03:04:38.835904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:56:31.407668
License: Public Domain

[1] Appellant Romuald Klausz appeals from the trial court's order granting appellee Dillon Company, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. Specifically, appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding section 13-21-115(3)(c), 6A C.R.S. (1987) (actions against landowners), constitutional. Contemporaneously with the announcement of this case, we have determined in Gallegos *Page 864 v. Phipps, No. 88SA141 (Colo. Sept. 18, 1989), that section 13-21-115
violates the equal protection provisions of the federal and state constitutions. U.S. Const. amend XIV; Colo. Const. art. II, § 25.
[2] Accordingly, we vacate the summary judgment entered by the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion and holding in Gallegos.