Court Opinion

ID: 9877511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 16:06:08.707354+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:23.967631
License: Public Domain

*274Per curiam.
[¶1] On April 25, 2017, Governor Doug Burgum notified the Supreme Court of, the retirement of the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge of the -District Court, with chambers in Grafton, Northeast Judicial District, effective October 1, 2017. Judge Geiger’s retirement creates a vacancy under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C.
[¶2] Under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C., this Court is required to review judicial vacancies that occur and determine, within 90 days of receiving notice of a vacancy, whether the office is necessary for effective judicial administration. This Court may, consistent with that determination, order a vacancy filled or order the vacant office transferred to another judicial district in which an additional judge is necessary, or abolish a vacant judicial office, with or without a transfer.
[¶3] Under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 7.2, notice of a written consultation with attorneys and judges and other interested persons in the Northeast Judicial District was posted May 23, 2017, on the website of the Supreme Court regarding the vacancy created by Judge Geiger’s retirement in Judgeship No.'6. Noticfe was also electronically provided to all presiding judges of the state. Written comments on the vacancy were permitted through June 19, 2017. This procedure is sufficient for purposes of the consultation required under Section 27-05-02.1, N.D.C.C.
[¶4] Comments supporting filling the vacancy in the current location were. received, and a. Report containing population and caseload trends, and other criteria identified in N.D. Sup. Ct, Admin. R. 7.2, Section 4, was filed June 8, 2017, by the Northeast Judicial District.. The State Court Administrator provided statewide weighted caseload statistics through May 2017. No comments or petitions were received to relocate this vacancy.
[¶5] The Court recently considered another judicial vacancy in the Northeast Judicial District. On April 14, 2017, based on the information provided in that matter, the Court filled a judicial vacancy in Rugby, North Dakota. See, Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, Northeast Judicial District, 2017 ND 85, 892 N.W.2d 886. We take judicial notice of the information contained in that file.
[¶6] According to the district’s report, under the local rules, Judgeship No. 6 is responsible1 for all the caseload with Walsh County, and is primarily assigned to cases in Cavalier and Pembina Counties. Judgeship No, 6 also is required to cover other matters throughout the other ten counties in the distinct when a judge recus-es or a timely demand for change of judge is filed.
[¶7] The current weighted caseload filings continue to show a slight decrease in the Northeast Judicial District, and a corresponding decrease in judicial officer need. The 2017-16 average weighted caseload shows a statewide judicial officer shortage of 9,13. This is an overall reduction in judicial officer need of 0.79 as compared to the 2016-16. While the Northeast Judicial District is currently showing an slight overage in judicial officer need, the administrative challenges in providing timely judicial service to large, rural districts do not now favor the elimination of this judgeship.
[¶8] Under the criteria of Section 4 of N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 7.2, the Court has *275considered all submissions received by the Court and its own administrative records on state-wide weighted caseload data.
[¶9] Based on the record before us, this Court determines the office is necessary for effective judicial administration in the Northeast Judicial District.
[¶10] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Judgeship No. 6 at Grafton in the Northeast Judicial District be filled in the manner provided by N.D.C.C. Chapter 27-25.
[¶11] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Jerod E. Tufte
Lisa Fair McEvers