Court Opinion

ID: 995841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:42:47.378222+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:01.075063
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6070

LONNIE K. MOORE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOE RACKLEY; L. M. PERTELLI; L. EDWARDS, As-
sistant Warden,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-97-678-R)

Submitted:   June 16, 1998                 Decided:   August 5, 1998

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lonnie K. Moore appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Moore v. Rackley, No. CA-97-678-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2