Court Opinion

ID: 8476468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 15:01:52.043058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:26.260109
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lightner, No. 3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2009; Oct. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.