Court Opinion

ID: 996548
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:52:37.570159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:45.166439
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID GILBERT, a/k/a David Whitt, a/k/a Steve
Whitt,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-90-144, CA-97-422-5)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998           Decided:   October 14, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Gilbert, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David Gilbert seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Gilbert, Nos. CR-90-144; CA-97-422-5 (S.D.W. Va.

Oct. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2