Court Opinion

ID: 41738
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 21:10:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:21.771239
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    April 12, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-20285
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:04-CR-184-ALL
                        --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Richard Lee Canterbury has

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).    Canterbury has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, the motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.        See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.