Court Opinion

ID: 7427176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:49:13.851884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:25.409383
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 4, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*870pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner and cross-respondent for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.