Court Opinion

ID: 5852686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 00:10:39.779407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:08.862939
License: Public Domain

*1213Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), entered September 28, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights with respect to the five children who are the subject of this proceeding based on a finding of permanent neglect and freeing the children for adoption. We reject the father’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding stage of the proceeding. “ ‘There was no showing of ineffectiveness here, nor may ineffectiveness be inferred merely because the attorney counseled [the father] to admit [to] the allegations in the petition[s]’ ” (Matter of Sean W. [Brittany W.], 87 AD3d 1318, 1319 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 802 [2011]). It is clear from the record that the attorney’s recommendation that the father admit to the allegations of permanent neglect was a matter of strategy (see Matter of Elijah D. [Allison D.], 74 AD3d 1846, 1847 [2010]; see generally People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712-713 [1998]). Further, “[a] parent alleging ineffective assistance of counsel [in a Family Court case] has the burden of demonstrating . . . that the deficient representation resulted in actual prejudice” (Matter of Michael C., 82 AD3d 1651, 1652 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011]; see Sean W., 87 AD3d at 1319), and the father failed to meet that burden here. Present — Centra, J.E, Garni, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.