Court Opinion

ID: 9952876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-20 20:03:44.974314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:41:02.102485
License: Public Domain

Filed 3/20/24 P. v. Walker CA2/6
     NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,                                                  2d Crim. No. B330842
                                                           (Super. Ct. No. KA129081)
     Plaintiff and Respondent,                               (Los Angeles County)

v.

JAVEN LUKE WALKER,

     Defendant and Appellant.

      Javen Luke Walker appeals a judgment following a trial
court’s finding that he violated the terms of his probation. In
2022, Walker pled no contest to assault with a firearm. (Pen.
Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2).) He was sentenced to four years in
prison. Execution of the sentence was suspended and he was
placed on formal probation for two years. In 2023, after a
contested probation violation hearing, the court found Walker
violated probation by possessing weapons. The court imposed a
sentence of four years in state prison with a total of 537 days
custody credits.
      We appointed counsel to represent Walker on this appeal.
Counsel filed a brief under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,
and stated she was unable to find any arguable issues to brief.
On January 29, 2024, we sent notice to Walker notifying him
about his right to file a supplemental brief setting forth any
issues he wanted this court to consider. Walker did not file a
supplemental brief. After a review of the record, we conclude
there has been no showing of any arguable issues for this appeal.
                            DISPOSITION
      The judgment is affirmed.
            NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                    GILBERT, P. J.

We concur:

             BALTODANO, J.

             CODY, J.

                                2
                   Joan M. Chrostek, Judge

             Superior Court County of Los Angeles

               ______________________________

     Lise M. Breakey, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.