Court Opinion

ID: 2946934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 04:09:21.266466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:04:49.810030
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-75,915-02

MARK RICHARD WALTERS, Relator

v.

WILLIAMSON COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 06-1501-K368 IN THE 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 368th Judicial District Court of Williamson County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and
that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of 
Williamson County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on
such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to
be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); or stating that
Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Williamson County. Should the
response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was
served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for
leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the
appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: March 21, 2012
Do not publish