Court Opinion

ID: 6944755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:19:29.984824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:51.824325
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Plaintiff, an importer, appeals from a judgment dismissing its claims for damages against defendant, a customs broker and freight forwarder, for various commercial torts and granting defendant’s counterclaim for freight charges. We reverse the trial court’s award of costs and otherwise affirm.
The governing agreement between the parties provided that, if defendant were successful in any litigation, plaintiff would pay defendant’s “expenses of collection and/or litigation, including a reasonable attorney fee[.]” Based on that provision, the trial court entered a supplemental judgment for attorney fees and for costs that included court reporter fees and other items that are not included in the costs that ORCP 68 A(2) permits a prevailing party to recover. In Malot v. Hadley, 102 Or App 336, 342, 794 P2d 833 (1990), we construed an agreement to pay the prevailing partys reasonable “expenses,” in the absence of language showing a contrary intent, as meaning “those costs and disbursements provided for by statute or rule at the time the cost bill was submitted.” Nothing in the agreement in this case leads us to construe “expenses of collection and/or litigation” differently. Defendant is entitled to recover only those costs that the applicable statutes or rules provide. Cf. Robinowitz v. Pozzi, 127 Or App 464, 470-71, 872 P2d 993, rev den 320 Or 109 (1994) (some separately billed expenses may be included in attorney fees).
Award of costs in supplemental judgment reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.