Court Opinion

ID: 5768844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:28:08.559778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:43.546575
License: Public Domain

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a superintendent at an apartment complex, was discharged in February 2007 after he was arrested in connection with an incident wherein he threatened a tenant with a baseball bat. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had lost his employment as a result of misconduct. This appeal by claimant ensued.
We affirm. “An employee’s contentious or threatening behavior in the workplace may constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Irizarri [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1149, 1149 [2007] [citation omitted]). In the case at bar, claimant’s assertion that he never threatened the tenant created a credibility issue for resolution by the Board, and the testimony from the employer’s property manager provided substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was fired due to misconduct (see id.).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Steiny JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.