Court Opinion

ID: 9605405
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 02:35:42.67165+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:06:36.427912
License: Public Domain

*186PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice,
dissenting on state’s motion for rehearing.
Without written opinion, the majority has decided to overrule the State’s Motion for Rehearing. Because I believe the State has raised a legitimate issue as to whether or not Appellee waived Article 38.23 as a basis for suppression of evidence seized pursuant to the search warrant the subject of this appeal, I would grant the State’s motion to address that issue. See Resendez v. State, 306 S.W.3d 308 (Tex.Crim.App.2009); (designated for publication).