Court Opinion

ID: 1016361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:48:03.87597+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:57.239845
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-6358

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TIMOTHY ADAMS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-302; CA-04-685-1)

Submitted:   June 9, 2005                  Decided:   June 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Adams, Appellant Pro Se.   David Bernard Smith, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Timothy   Adams    appeals      the    district    court’s      order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion.      We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error.      Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.      See United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-

94-302; CA-04-685-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2005).              We dispense with

oral   argument   because    the   facts    and    legal     contentions    are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                   - 2 -