Court Opinion

ID: 9791855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:19:31.227481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:39.015308
License: Public Domain

SCHWAB, C. J.,
specially concurring.
I concur in both the reasoning and result of the majority opinion but point out that we need not have reached the question of the sufficiency of the indictment. Womack v. Kremen, 234 Or 170, 380 P2d 815, cert den 375 US 857, 84 S Ct 121, 11 L Ed 2d 84 (1963), tells us that the failure of the indictment to state a crime is not a ground for post-conviction relief. See also, Lilly v. Gladden, 220 Or 84, 348 P2d 1 (1959).