Court Opinion

ID: 1004617
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:43:57.892025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:34.132234
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ANTHONY MCQUEEN, a/k/a Champ,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-26-BR, CA-98-201-7-BR)

Submitted:   May 31, 2001                  Decided:   June 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony McQueen, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Anthony McQueen seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000)

and his motion for enlargement of time to file a motion for recon-

sideration.   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. McQueen, Nos. CR-95-26-BR;

CA-98-201-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2000; Nov. 30, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2