Court Opinion

ID: 2864627
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:42:56.462724+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:32.842072
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00307-CR

Crystal Diane Castillo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 8985, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES, III, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Crystal Diane Castillo was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after she pleaded guilty to assaulting a public servant.  See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.
§ 22.01(West Supp. 2002).  After a hearing on the State's motion, the court later revoked supervision
and adjudicated her guilty.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  Counsel's
motion to withdraw is granted.  
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed:   November 15, 2002
Do Not Publish