Court Opinion

ID: 3109151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:35:02.338004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:00.013111
License: Public Domain

NOS. 07-10-00122-CR, 07-10-00123-CR, 07-10-00171-CR and 07-10-00172-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                     AT AMARILLO

                                       PANEL A

                                     MAY 4, 2011

                       GREGORIO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT

                                           v.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                     FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

             AND THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

           NOS. 2009-455,818, 2009-458,190, 2009-425,597, 2009-422,825;

                       HONORABLE CECIL PURYEAR, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

      In each of these four appeals, appellant Gregorio Rodriguez appeals his

conviction on an open plea of guilty and resulting sentence.

Offenses committed on December 21, 2008:
      In appellate case number 07-10-0172-CR, appellant was convicted of
      evading arrest or detention with a vehicle and sentenced to 18 months in a
      state jail facility;1

      In appellate case number 07-10-0122-CR, appellant was convicted of
      possession of marijuana of less than two ounces in a drug free zone and
      sentenced to 12 months in the Lubbock County Jail.2

Offenses committed on October 25, 2009:

      In appellate case number 07-10-0171-CR, appellant was convicted of
      possession of a controlled substance listed in penalty group 1, cocaine of
      less than one gram and sentenced to 24 months in a state jail facility;3

      In appellate case number 07-10-0123-CR, appellant was convicted of
      driving while intoxicated and sentenced to 6 months in the Lubbock
      County Jail.4

      1
         A person commits the offense of evading arrest or detention if he intentionally
flees a person he knows is a peace officer lawfully attempting to arrest or detain him.
Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.04(a) (West Supp. 2010). The offense is a state jail felony if
the actor uses a vehicle while in flight and the actor has not previously been convicted
under Penal Code § 38.04. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.04(b)(1)(B) (West Supp. 2010).
      2
        Possession of two ounces or less of marijuana is a Class B misdemeanor, Tex.
Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121(b)(1) (West 2010), but increases to a Class A
misdemeanor if committed within 1,000 feet of the real property of a school. Tex.
Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.134(f)(1) (West 2010). A Class A misdemeanor is
punishable by confinement in jail for up to one year and/or a fine not to exceed $4,000.
Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.21 (West 2003).
      3
         Possession of less than one gram of cocaine is a state jail felony. Tex. Health
and Safety Code Ann. § 481.102(3)(D) (West 2010) (cocaine is a Penalty Group 1
controlled substance) and Tex. Health and Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a),(b) (West
2010) (possession of less than one gram of cocaine is a state jail felony). A state jail
felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail facility for any term of not more than
two years or less than 180 days and a fine not to exceed $ 10,000. Tex. Penal Code
Ann. § 12.35 (West 2010).
      4
       In the absence of facts not charged here, driving while intoxicated is a Class B
misdemeanor. A person commits the offense of driving while intoxicated if the person is
                                            2
      In each case, appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a motion to

withdraw from representation supported by an Anders brief.5 Agreeing with counsel’s

conclusion that the record fails to show any arguably meritorious issue capable of

supporting an appeal, we grant the motion to withdraw in each case and affirm the trial

court’s judgments.

      Punishment hearing testimony showed that on December 21, 2008, a police

officer saw a vehicle driving erratically. The officer attempted a traffic stop. As the

officer followed the vehicle, he saw a person leap from the vehicle while it remained in

motion. The vehicle then jumped a curb, knocked down a fence, and collided with a

parked vehicle in a driveway. The location of the accident was within 1,000 feet of a

public school. When the officer entered the passenger compartment to turn off the

ignition and place the transmission in park, he saw an open container of alcohol. An

officer later also found a baggy containing what he believed was marijuana. Police

eventually were able to identify appellant as the person operating the vehicle.

      Punishment evidence also showed that on October 25, 2009, a motor vehicle

driven by appellant struck a police vehicle in the presence of officers.          Appellant

attempted to flee on foot, but was apprehended and arrested for evading arrest or

detention. An officer detected the odor of alcohol on appellant’s breath and the odor of

marijuana “on his person.”       While searching appellant for weapons, the officer

intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §
49.04(a) (West 2003).
      5
         Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) and
In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008) (orig. proceeding).

                                            3
discovered a baggie containing what he believed was marijuana.              In the officer’s

opinion, appellant appeared intoxicated. He had difficulty standing and walking and was

unresponsive to questions. The officer transported appellant to a holding facility. As

appellant left the police vehicle, a clear plastic baggie containing a white powder fell

from his pant leg. According to a field test, the substance was cocaine. This was later

confirmed by the Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Laboratory.

       Appellant was charged by indictment or information with the four offenses, and

entered guilty pleas to the charged offenses without a plea bargain agreement.             A

punishment hearing in each case was held the same day as the plea hearing. The trial

court admonished appellant of the applicable ranges of punishment and determined he

was a United States citizen. It also explained and determined appellant wished to waive

the right to trial by jury and the right against self-incrimination. Two police officers gave

the testimony we have summarized of the circumstances of the December 2008 and

October 2009 offenses.      Appellant presented two witnesses.       A deacon testified of

appellant’s church involvement over the preceding five months. The second witness, a

relative of appellant, testified of his industry in the workplace, abstinence from alcohol,

and family commitment. Following the close of evidence and arguments, the court

sentenced appellant in each case. Appellant obtained trial court certification of the right

of appeal and timely appealed.

       Thereafter, appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw

supported by an Anders brief. In the brief, he certifies to his diligent review of the record

and his opinion under the controlling authorities and facts of the cases no reversible

                                             4
error or arguably legitimate ground for appeal exists.          The brief discusses the

procedural history of the case and the events at the plea hearing. Counsel discusses

the applicable law and sets forth the reasons he believes no arguably meritorious issues

for appeal exist. A letter to appellant from counsel, attached to counsel’s motion to

withdraw, indicates that a copy of the Anders brief and the motion to withdraw were

served on appellant, and counsel advised appellant of his right to review the record and

file a pro se response. Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 645 (Tex.App.--Waco 1994,

pet. refused). By letter, this court also notified appellant of his opportunity to submit a

response to the Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by his counsel. Appellant did

not file a response.

       In conformity with the standards set out by the United States Supreme Court, we

will not rule on the motion to withdraw until we have independently examined the record

in each matter. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1997, no

pet.). If we determine the appeal has arguable merit, we will remand it to the trial court

for appointment of new counsel. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511

(Tex.Crim.App.1991).

       In the Anders brief, counsel concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have made an

independent review of the entire record to determine whether arguable grounds

supporting an appeal exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102
L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We find

no arguable grounds supporting a claim of reversible error, and agree with counsel that

the appeal is frivolous.

                                            5
       Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw6 in each case and affirm the

judgments of the trial court.

                                                        James T. Campbell
                                                             Justice

Do not publish.

       6
        Counsel shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client
a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file
a pro se petition for discretionary review. Tex. R. App. P. 48.4.

                                             6