Court Opinion

ID: 1005881
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:02:48.84965+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:58.838753
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7203

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROHAN ALEXANDER WALTERS, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a
Rohan Williams,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-97-157, CA-00-878-2)

Submitted:   October 10, 2001          Decided:     November 13, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan Alexander Walters, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Rohan Alexander Walters seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court.      United States v. Walters, Nos.

CR-97-157; CA-00-878-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 5, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2