Court Opinion

ID: 3073936
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:58:30.385122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:49.376395
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-13-00392-CV

                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

              TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                     TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT LENHAM AND                                §      APPEAL FROM THE
GEORGANNE LENHAM,
APPELLANTS

V.                                               §      COUNTY COURT AT LAW

GLORIA OETTING, EXECUTRIX OF
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES LAIRD,
APPELLEE                                         §      CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                      PER CURIAM
       This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on September 11, 2013.
Under the rules of appellate procedure, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after
the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. But if any party timely files a motion for new
trial, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). To be timely, a motion for new trial must be filed within thirty days after the
judgment is signed. TEX. R. CIV. APP. P. 329b(a).
       Appellants filed a motion for new trial.         Because the judgment was signed on
September 11, 2013, Appellants’ motion for new trial was due to have been filed on or before
October 11, 2013, i.e. within thirty days after the judgment was signed. However, Appellants
did not file their motion for new trial until October 15, 2013. Therefore, the motion did not
extend Appellants’ time for filing their notice of appeal. Consequently, their notice of appeal
was due to have been filed on or before October 11, 2013.
       Appellants did not file their notice of appeal until December 27, 2013, and filed a motion
on December 30, 2013, requesting an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal. However,
the deadline for Appellants to file their motion for extension of time was October 26, 2013. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (motion for extension of time to be filed within fifteen days after deadline
for filing notice of appeal). Because Appellants’ motion for extension of time was not filed until
December 30, 2013, it must be overruled. Consequently, their notice of appeal is also untimely.
         On December 31, 2013, this court notified Appellants, pursuant to Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure 37.1 and 42.3, that their notice of appeal was untimely and there was no
timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Appellants were further
informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before January 10, 2014, the
information filed in the appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court.            The
January 10, 2014 deadline has now passed, and Appellants have not shown the jurisdiction of
this court.
         Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as
provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, Appellant’s motion for extension
of time to file their notice of appeal is overruled, and the appeal is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
Opinion delivered January 22, 2014.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

                                                    (PUBLISH)

                                                           2
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                          JANUARY 22, 2014

                                         NO. 12-13-00392-CV

               ROBERT LENHAM AND GEORGANNE LENHAM,
                              Appellants
                                 V.
      GLORIA OETTING, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES LAIRD,
                               Appellee

                               Appeal from the County Court at Law
                         of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. P11743)

                      THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the
appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
                      It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision
be certified to the court below for observance.
                   By per curiam opinion.
                   Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J .