Court Opinion

ID: 4286482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-20 19:51:34.437305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:54:00.472336
License: Public Domain

People v Bogun (2018 NY Slip Op 04558)

People v Bogun

2018 NY Slip Op 04558

Decided on June 20, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2016-08276
 (Ind. No. 258/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vRafal M. Bogun, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Isa Chakarian of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Barry Kron, J.), imposed July 19, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The Supreme Court's limited colloquy did not ensure the defendant's understanding of the distinction between the right to appeal and other rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137; People v Johnson, 109 AD3d 1004). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court