Court Opinion

ID: 6034072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 13:08:46.617892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:23.698927
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered December 9, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he sold a bag of cocaine to an undercover police officer is unpreserved for appellate review *580(see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.