Court Opinion

ID: 8779621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 13:13:50.257289+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:02:46.027572
License: Public Domain

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
This is an application by the lessee of a building near the Twenty-Third street westerly terminal for a modification of the lease, by reducing the amount of rent reserved. The lease was entered into April 30, 1909, for a period of five years, with a privilege reserved to the lessor to terminate it on the 1st day of May or November in any year upon giving six months’ notice. It was in renewal at the same rent of a prior lease to petitioner or his brother,, and petitioner was himself in possession for some time before the execution of the new lease.
Under the various orders and decrees the receivers had abundant authority to make such a lease, without first securing the specific approval of the court. The business conducted on the premises is that of a hotel. Petitioner states that the receipts of the business have fallen off materially in consequence of the operation of the cars run to that terminal. Heretofore they stopped at two stubs and a switch quite near the hotel. Now they run by the hotel, without stopping, upon a loop which sweeps around near ferry entrances. The difficulty with his application, however, is that the change in mode of opera! tion was made many months before the new lease was entered into. Nothing has been done by receivers subsequent to renewal to affect his business in any way. It is thought that the court should not, under these circumstances, déprive creditors of whatever may come to them by the enforcement of the lease.
Motion denied.