Court Opinion

ID: 1229506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:07:58.939402+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:35.422275
License: Public Domain

3 Mich. App. 272 (1966)
142 N.W.2d 43
PEOPLE
v.
WILLIAMS.
Docket No. 929.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided May 11, 1966.
Rehearing denied June 28, 1966.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Samuel H. Olsen, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Luvenia D. Dockett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Mayer & Mayer (Thomas C. Mayer, of counsel), for defendant.
QUINN, J.
Defendant was charged with carnal knowledge of a female minor. CLS 1961, § 750.520 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788). He waived jury trial and was tried by the judge, convicted, and sentenced. He raises two questions on this appeal, namely: was he denied a public trial as guaranteed by State and Federal Constitutions and was his guilt proved beyond a reasonable doubt?
The trial was held in a small room adjoining the courtroom. Defendant did not object. The door from the small room to the courtroom was open. People in one part of the courtroom could see into the small room. The record does not disclose the trial was so held to exclude anyone, nor does it indicate anyone was actually excluded from the trial.
The constitutional guaranty of public trial is not and cannot be questioned. Const 1963, art 1, § 20; US Const, Am 6 and Am 14. The legislature has ordained that all court sittings be public. CLS *274 1961, § 600.1420 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.1420). Our courts have protected the right whenever violation has been shown. People v. Murray (1891), 89 Mich 276 (14 LRA 809, 28 Am St Rep 294); People v. Yeager (1897), 113 Mich 228; People v. Micalizzi (1923), 223 Mich 580. Mere assertion of the right does not establish the violation, however. Without a showing that the public was excluded or that trial was held in a place other than the courtroom for the purpose of such exclusion, there is no showing that defendant was not afforded a public trial. There is no such showing on this record.
There is evidence in the record of defendant's sexual relations with the female minor and that she gave birth to a child. The minor was 13 years of age at the time of the alleged offense. This Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge who heard the witnesses and observed their demeanor when the record contains evidence that supports the finding of the trial court. People v. Stevens (1965), 1 Mich App 673.
Affirmed.
McGREGOR, P.J., and HOLBROOK, J., concurred.