Court Opinion

ID: 9871974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 20:50:16.059749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:17.918789
License: Public Domain

PARIENTE, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
For the reasons set forth in my concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion in Asay23 and elaborated on inGaskin,24 I would grant Bogle a new penalty phase under Hurst.25
Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion to affirm Bogle’s sentence of death.

. Asay v. State, 210 So.3d 1, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S646, 2016 WL 7406538 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2016).

. Gaskin v. State, 218 So.3d 399, No. SC15-1884, 2017 WL 224772 (slip op. issued Fla. Jan. 19, 2017).

. Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016); see Hurst v. Florida, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).