Court Opinion

ID: 3758882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:16:09.551827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:16.587816
License: Public Domain

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
This matter is before the court on the petition of Andrew D. and his parents, Robert and Monica D., for a writ of habeas corpus.
Petitioners allege that Andrew D., a juvenile, is being held in the Erie County Detention Home, "Pursuant [sic] to no Order of Court or warrant."  Yet, attached to their petition is a judgment entry of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, ordering Andrew's detention, pending an adjudicatory hearing on sexual imposition allegations.
R.C. 2725.05 provides;
  "If it appears that a person alleged to be restrained of his liberty is in the custody of an officer under process issued by a court or magistrate, or by virtue of the judgment or order of a court of record, and that the court or magistrate had jurisdiction to issue the process, render the judgment, or make the order, the writ of habeas corpus shall not be allowed. If the jurisdiction appears after the writ is allowed, the person shall not be discharged by reason of any informality or defect in the process, judgment, or order."
Andrew is a juvenile, so the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Division is proper.  As petitioner's own exhibit demonstrates, Andrew is being held under the order of a court of record.  Consequently, petitioner's request for the writ is deficient on it's face.  Accordingly, the petition before us is, hereby, dismissed at petitioners costs.
Melvin L. Resnick, J., James R. Sherck, J., and Richard W. Knepper,J., CONCUR.