Court Opinion

ID: 2922816
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:23:57.869028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:25.453488
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-659-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________
 
IN RE: ALBERTO DE ANDA DURAN, M.D. 
__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

	Relator, Alberto De Anda Duran, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
the above cause on November 30, 2006.  Real parties in interest, Viridiana Mata,
individually, and Alejandro Rodriguez, individually, and all on behalf of Genoveva
Rodriguez, a minor, filed a response to the petition on December 15, 2006.  The
Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with
appendix and the response with appendix, is of the opinion that relator has not shown
himself entitled to the relief sought.
	Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App.
P. 52.8(a).

								PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 28th day of December 2006.
1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but
is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).