Court Opinion

ID: 9833656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:55:34.598314+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:05.644695
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
It was inadvertently said in the opinion of this Court filed on March 4, 1942, that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict for appellant. The statement has been deleted from the opinion. Our holding was, in effect, that the trial court erred in not rendering judgment against Stick-ney, and for Bute, on the verdict of the jury, in' connection with undisputed testimony and the admissions made by Stick-ney in the course of the trial. ■
We adhere to that holding and overrule Stickney’s motion for rehearing.