Court Opinion

ID: 4484964
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-16 21:17:04.591508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:05.390129
License: Public Domain

Sterrett, J., concurring: I concur in the result in this particular case, but I want to make it clear that I do not view this opinion as disallowing the cost of meals in all instances where only partners, co-workers, etc., are involved. We have here findings that the partners met at lunch because it was "convenient” and "convenient” 5 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Tannenwald, Fay, Goffe, Whitaker, Korner, Shields, Hamblen, and Cohen, JJ., agree with this concurring opinion.