Court Opinion

ID: 9901381
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-21 18:02:01.067819+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:31.579957
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12108   Document: 22-1     Date Filed: 11/21/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 ,[DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
              United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-12108
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

       In Re: LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
                                                    Plaintiﬀ-Appellant.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 6:21-mc-00163-RBD-DCI
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12108      Document: 22-1     Date Filed: 11/21/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-12108

       Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. Lena Lindberg appeals, pro se, from a May 23, 2023, magis-
       trate judge screening order returning her filings and revoking her
       access to a pro se filing portal. The order, however, is not final or
       appealable to this Court, as an appeal from a magistrate judge order
       must be taken to the district court. See United States v. Schultz,
       565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). Even if the district judge ulti-
       mately affirms the order, the subsequent affirmance would not
       cure Lindberg’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego v. Ala-
       chua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998).
             All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for
       rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.