Court Opinion

ID: 9929111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-01 19:00:45.279758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:16:20.590446
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10753         Document: 00517052615             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/01/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 23-10753
                                                                                       FILED
                                                                                February 1, 2024
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Montray Lorenzo Cato,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:23-CR-76-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Montray Cato
   has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
   738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cato has
   not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10753     Document: 00517052615          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/01/2024

                                   No. 23-10753

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-
   frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2