Court Opinion

ID: 2656511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-03-13 05:08:03.678007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:26.467380
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The Plaintiff has stated no ground for federal jurisdiction. If he intends his complaint to be defamation, he says nothing about residence or extent of damages required for diversity jurisdiction over a state law claim. It is not case citations he lacks; but he alleges no injury protected by federal law.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.