Court Opinion

ID: 8420238
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 20:15:41.62483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:23.045267
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Francisco Gonzalez-Cisneros appeals his jury trial conviction and 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a pro se supplemental brief. However, our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and his pro se supplemental brief, discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.