Court Opinion

ID: 9665555
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:51:23.037758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:16.702219
License: Public Domain

*510Wilkie, J.
(concurring). I concur in the result of this case but not in the reasoning of the majority. The commission found, as a fact, that there was a deviation for a private and personal purpose. This is a finding of fact which is reasonably supported by the credible evidence or reasonable inferences drawn therefrom.
I disagree with the majority’s statement “It can be said as a matter of law that his deviation was for a private and personal purpose.” The commission could have found that Neese’s authorization to select his own eating places was so broad that this particular trip was not a deviation. It did not so find and I conclude we are bound by the finding made by the commission.
I am authorized to state that Mr. Chief Justice CURRIE and Mr. Justice Heffernan join in this opinion.