Court Opinion

ID: 8607979
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 05:12:20.655137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:17.929532
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Elridge V. Hills appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hills v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:05-cv-00319 (D.S.C. Sept. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.