Court Opinion

ID: 2905762
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:25:54.86681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:13.483449
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-046 CV

____________________

MARTIN R. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

JOE JACKSON, CONSTANCE HENSON AND PAUL EAGLIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 58th District Court
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. A-163381

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
	On May 18, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained
why he needed time for filing the record.  Appellant did not respond.  The appellant is not
entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.  There being no
satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Costs are assessed against appellant.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								____________________________
								        STEVE McKEITHEN
									      Chief Justice

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.