Court Opinion

ID: 2683143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-11 21:03:36.303382+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:07.632543
License: Public Domain

People v Hill (2014 NY Slip Op 04963)
People v Hill
2014 NY Slip Op 04963
Decided on July 2, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on July 2, 2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentRANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

2010-09525
 (Ind. No. 4802/09)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vKevion Hill, appellant.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed December 18, 2009, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant purportedly waived his right to appeal. The Supreme Court, however, did not fulfill its responsibility to ensure that the waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265). Accordingly, the waiver cannot be enforced (see id. at 265-266).
However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court