Court Opinion

ID: 9778975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 21:30:19.834892+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:17.978866
License: Public Domain

On Appellees’ Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing -ap-pellees direct our attention to an instrument dated July 26, 1937, executed by appellant Lula Carlton and her husband E. H'. Carlton, correcting the acknowledgment of Lula Carlton to the power of attorney to Clifford M. Montgomery, rati*432fying the said power of attorney and the quitclaim deed to Mary Rylander.
In their reply to appellees’ motion appellants confess that Lula Carlton is precluded from any recovery herein.
To the extent above noted appellees’ motion for rehearing is granted and otherwise it is overruled.
Our former judgment is accordingly corrected. The judgment of the trial court as to Lula Carlton is affirmed, in all other respects that judgment is reversed and judgment is here rendered that appellants (except Lula Carlton) recover title and possession of 1%2ths of the undivided ¼⅛ mineral interest sued for.
Appellants, except Lula Carlton, shall recover their costs.
Former judgment corrected.
Motion in part granted and in part overruled.