Court Opinion

ID: 1003518
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:27:45.835256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:19.924134
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-2150

TYRONE ANDREWS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

J. M. DAW, in his individual capacity,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-97-602-5-BO)

Submitted:   January 19, 2001             Decided:   February 9, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Reuben Franklin Young, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    Andrews v. Daw, No. CA-97-602-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 18, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2