Court Opinion

ID: 9765382
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 04:01:30.424843+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:09.453912
License: Public Domain

ZAPPALA, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent from the Court’s decision to quash the appeal, treat the matter as a petition for allowance of appeal, and deny allocatur. See Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. Lindberg, 508 Pa. 423, 436, 469 A.2d 1012, 1019 (1983) (Concurring Opinion of Roberts, C.J., joined by Zappala, J.). As to the merits of the appeal, believing that the Commonwealth Court properly decided the issue presented, I would affirm the Order of that court.