Court Opinion

ID: 1370452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:49:49.275913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:13:46.362287
License: Public Domain

310 S.W.3d 301 (2010)
Tony JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 93514.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 11, 2010.
Brocca L. Smith, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
*302 Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Prior report: 186 S.W.3d 476.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tony Johnson appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.[1] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.