Court Opinion

ID: 9914374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-30 21:01:15.40021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:12:02.985251
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2300      Doc: 20         Filed: 12/29/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2300

        MARYS PAIZ-DE DELGADO,

                            Petitioner,

                     v.

        MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General,

                            Respondent.

        On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

        Submitted: October 18, 2023                                 Decided: December 29, 2023

        Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        ON BRIEF: Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
        Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General,
        Sabatino F. Leo, Assistant Director, Tatiana G. Pino, Office of Immigration Litigation,
        Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
        Respondent.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2300         Doc: 20      Filed: 12/29/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Marys Paiz-De Delgado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of

        an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the Immigration

        Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

        the Convention Against Torture. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and Paiz-De

        Delgado’s claims, we conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any

        of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial

        evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

        Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Paiz-De Delgado (B.I.A. Nov. 22,

        2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

        adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                              PETITION DENIED

                                                     2