Court Opinion

ID: 9811392
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 22:19:11.57894+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:13:18.918692
License: Public Domain

*653CONCURRING OPINION
BOB McCOY, Justice.
I agree with the dissent that “[i]t was, therefore, unnecessary to the disposition of this appeal for the majority to decide the question of whether section 263.405(i) violates the separation of powers clause because it bars us from reviewing the merits of Betty’s complaint. The majority’s opinion on that issue is dicta.” Dissenting and concurring op. at 2.1 concur only with the *654majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s final order terminating parental rights. Because I would hold that it was not necessary to reach the constitutional question concerning section 263.405(i) of the Texas Family Code, I do not join in either opinion’s analysis of the constitutionality of that statute.