Court Opinion

ID: 990179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:17:19.962373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:44.696007
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6649

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ZERREI SOUHEIL, a/k/a Smiley,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-94-6, CA-96-139)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 12, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zerrei Souheil, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Anti-
terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

Souheil's motion for appointment of counsel is denied and we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Souheil,
Nos. CR-94-6; CA-96-139 (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2