Court Opinion

ID: 2962581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:59:28.934792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:38.757969
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          June 15, 1994                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 93-1021                                  DAVID W. EISENBERG,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              ROBERT MCDONNELL, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                               Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ____________________            David W. Eisenberg on brief pro se.            __________________                                 ____________________                                 ____________________                      Per Curiam.  The orders of  the district court that                      __________            are  the subject  of this  appeal  are affirmed.   Plaintiff-                                                   ________            appellant  David  Eisenberg's  brief  offers  no  argument in            support of this appeal, instead raising irrelevant challenges            to this court's  actions in prior appeals  filed by him.   In            any event, we see no error in the district court's orders.