Court Opinion

ID: 4559974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-26 21:01:19.631601+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:13:31.071802
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                            ::r-fove:mber 29~. 20 1 7

                                                                                                  TNCOURTOF
                                                                                        l\ OR..I.i::IRS' COJi.iiPINS.I~TION
                                                                                                    C1 ..:\D.lS

              TENNESSE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
            IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                           AT CHATTANOOGA

Thomas Sustersic,                                      )   Docket No.: 2015-01-0402
           Employee,                                   )
v.                                                     )   State File No.: 95737-2014
                                                       )
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.,                             )   Judge Audrey A. Headrick
          Employer.                                    )

                               EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

       This matter came before the undersigned workers' compensation judge on
November 8, 2017, on the Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Thomas Sustersic.
The central legal issue is whether Mr. Sustersic is likely to establish at a hearing on the
merits that he sustained an injury resulting in compensable hernias. For the reasons set
forth below, the Court holds Mr. Sustersic is not entitled to the requested medical and
temporary disability benefits at this time.

                                          History of Claim

       Mr. Sustersic, a delivery driver/order picker at Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
(Lowes), all eged he devel oped two ventral hernias on April23, 2017, wben he and a co-
worker lifted a range up approximately four feet and slid it into a flatbed truck. 1 Mr.
Sustersic stated his stomach felt "very uneasy" and "had been hurting all day" before
moving the range. He also stated he developed pain and extreme discomfort after lifting
the range and described the incident as "the straw that broke the camel's back." Mr.
Sustersic went to the emergency room at Tennova the following night due to continued
stomach pain and vomiting. An abdominal CT scan showed a bowel obstruction and a
ventral abdominal wall hernia.

1
  Mr. Sustersic's job duties include moving heavy products and appliances with dollies. Melanie
Roberson, service manager, testified that he initially requested a forklift to move the range. However, a
forklift was not available.

                                                   1
       The Tennova records reflected differing histories from Mr. Sustersic on April 24.
In one history, Mr. Sustersic stated he had "a history of abdominal pain, he also has
several episodes of nausea and vomiting, he also has some diarrhea, he also has some
lightheadedness, this [sic] been going on since yesterday." Another history indicated Mr.
Sustersic had "a history of abdominal pain for about 48 hours." The record stated he
"spent the entire day yesterday having nausea and vomiting abdominal pain." The
operative note stated that, upon arrival at the emergency room, Mr. Sustersic complained
of abdominal pain "for the last 24 hours." The cardiologist consult noted: "[Mr.
Sustersic] presented to the ER last night after having intractable nausea and vomiting x2
days. He reports that over the past week or so he has felt that his stomach was getting
hard and whenever he would exert himself he would have stomach cramps." During
cross-examination, Mr. Sustersic admitted he had stomach pain for a few days to a week
before the April 23 incident.

        Dr. Joshua Worthington performed Mr. Sustersic's surgery on April 24. He
repaired two ventral hernias. After his surgery, Mr. Sustersic notified Lowe's about his
injury. The initial hernia repair failed, and Dr. Worthington performed a second hernia
repair, which was also unsuccessful. Dr. Worthington indicated he could do nothing else
for Mr. Sustersic, so he referred him to Dr. Mancini, a hernia specialist, for a second
opmwn.

       When addressing causation, Dr. Worthington stated a review of Tennova's records
indicated that Mr. Sustersic did not pro ide a history of a work injury ? Further, Dr.
Worthington felt that, "it is more likely than not that Mr. Sustersic's hernias existed prior
to April2017."

       As to the apparent discrepancies in the Tennova records, Mr. Sustersic argued the
cardiology consult asked different questions than the surgeon, resulting in different
answers but no significant inconsistencies. Regarding the lack of any reference to a
work-related injury in the Tennova records, Mr. Sustersic stated he was in terrible
condition when he met with Dr. Worthington and had a tube in his nose. Further, Mr.
Sustersic argued that he satisfied the statutory requirements of a compensable hernia and
no evidence established he did anything else to cause the hernias.

       Lowe's argued Mr. Sustersic's injury did not satisfy the statutory requirements of
a compensable hernia in that the hernia statute requires a higher standard of definite
proof. Lowe's stressed that the conflicting histories Mr. Sustersic gave at Tennova affect
his credibility as to the date the hernia symptoms occurred. Similarly, Lowe's noted that

2
 Mr. Sustersic initially testified he could not recall if he mentioned to any of the medical providers that
he lifted a range. He then recalled that he told Dr. Worthington, some nurses in the emergency room, and
possibly the cardiologist consult that he worked at Lowe's pulling/lifting appliances.

                                                    2
Mr. Sustersic never mentioned a work-related incident to Dr. Worthington or any medical
provider during any of his hospitalizations.

                        Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

       Mr. Sustersic must come forward with sufficient evidence from which the Court
can determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
239(d)(1) (2017). Because he alleged a hernia injury, he must "definitely prove[] to the
satisfaction of the court" that:

       (1) There was an injury resulting in hernia or rupture;
       (2) The hernia or rupture appeared suddenly;
       (3) It was accompanied by pain;
       (4) The hernia or rupture immediately followed the accident; and
       (5) The hernia or rupture did not exist prior to the accident for which
       compensation is claimed.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-212(a). The reason for the strict requirements of section 50-6-
212(a) is "to remove the issue [of what is a compensable hernia] as far as possible from
the field of conjecture and speculation." Matthews v. Hardaway Contracting Co., 163
S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tenn. 1942). Thus, an employee seeking benefits for a hernia must "bring
[his] case within the provisions" of that section. ld. at 62. Guided by this authority, the
Court will analyze the evidence in light of each of the statutory requirements.

       As to the first criterion, an "injury resulting in hernia," Mr. Sustersic testified that
he injured himself on April 23 when he loaded a range onto a flatbed truck with a co-
worker. However, he stated his stomach felt "very uneasy" and "had been hurting all
day" before the range incident. Mr. Sustersic described the range incident as "the straw
that broke the camel's back," causing him extreme discomfort. That testimony supports
the history he provided to the cardiology consult on April 24 when he reported, "that over
the past week or so he has felt that his stomach was getting hard and whenever he would
exert himself he would have stomach cramps." Mr. Sustersic also admitted during cross-
examination that he experienced stomach pain for a few days to a week before April 23.
Further, the medical records are silent regarding any work-related incident. Therefore,
the Court finds Mr. Sustersic unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits regarding the
injury requirement.

       As for the second "sudden appearance" criterion, Mr. Sustersic's testimony and
the medical records are unclear as to when he actually developed the ventral hernias. Dr.
Worthington's opinion is that the hernias occurred sometime before April 2017.
Therefore, the Court finds Mr. Sustersic did not satisfy the sudden-appearance
requirement.

                                              3
        Concerning the third criterion, "accompanied by pain," Mr. Sustersic's testimony
and the medical records reflect that he complained of stomach hardness and stomach
cramping in the week leading up to April 23. Although the evidence does not indicate
exactly when the ventral hernias developed, the Court finds that Mr. Sustersic's pain
satisfies this requirement.

        Turning now to the fourth criterion, "immediately following the accident," in Etter
v. Blue Diamond Coal Co., 215 S.W.2d 803, 806 (Tenn. 1948), the Supreme Court
explained that the meaning of the word "immediately" depends upon the circumstances
and events in connection with which the word is used. In this case, Dr. Worthington's
opinion is that the hernias occurred before April 20 17. The evidence does not indicate
that an "accident" occurred on April 23. Therefore, the Court finds Mr. Sustersic did not
satisfy the requirement that his ventral hernias immediately followed an accident.

       As for the fifth and final criterion, that the "hernia was not pre-existing," Dr.
Worthington's opinion is that, "it is more likely than not that Mr. Sustersic's hernias
existed prior to April 2017." Thus, the Court finds Mr. Sustersic failed to establish the
requirement that his ventral hernias were not preexisting.

       In conclusion, the Court holds the evidence shows Mr. Sustersic is unlikely to
prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving he suffered compensable ventral hernias.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

   1. Mr. Sustersic' s requested relief is denied at this time.

   2. This matter is set for a Status Hearing on Tuesday, January 30,2018, at 2:00p.m.,
      Eastern Time. You must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to
      participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without your
      participation.

       ENTERED this the 29th day of November, 2017.

                                              4
                                    APPENDIX

Exhibits:
   1. Affidavit of Thomas J. Sustersic
   2. Medical records of Tennova Healthcare
   3. Medical records of Joshua A. Worthington, M.D.
   4. Affidavit of Dr. Worthington
   5. First Report
   6. Wage Statement

Technical record:
   1. Petition for Benefit Determination
   2. Dispute Certification Notice
   3. Request for Expedited Hearing
   4. Notice of Expedited Hearing
   5. Expedited Trial Brief
   6. Notice of Filing Supplemental Exhibits to Employer's Expedited Trial Brief
   7. Employer's List of Witnesses

                                          5
                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
        I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
 sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this 29th day of
 November, 2017.

Name                   Certified       Via          Email Address
                       Mail            Email
Matthew Coleman,                           X       mcoleman(a),loganthomQsonlaw .com
Employee's Attorney                                lbavwood@loganthomQsonlaw.com
Michael Newton,                            X       mike.newton@leitnerfirm.com
Employer's Attorney                                carol. baker@leitnetflrm.com

                                         P&Su:±:::RK
                                         wc.courtcl ~ut<.@tn.gov

                                            6