Court Opinion

ID: 9402790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-16 21:00:36.775844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:02.638467
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1998      Doc: 18         Filed: 06/15/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-1998

        LAYLAH MARSH,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON,

                             Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
        Charlotte. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:21-cv-00189-BO)

        Submitted: May 17, 2023                                           Decided: June 15, 2023

        Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Laylah Marsh, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorney General; NORTH
        CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jeremy Michael
        Falcone, Alex John Hagan, Raleigh, North Carolina, Dixie Thomas Wells, ELLIS &
        WINTERS, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1998      Doc: 18        Filed: 06/15/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Laylah Marsh appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for

        judgment on the pleadings, dismissing Marsh’s lawsuit alleging breach of contract and

        violations of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 to 1688,

        and denying her motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

        error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marsh v. Univ.

        of North Carolina at Wilmington, No. 7:21-cv-00189-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2023). We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2