Court Opinion

ID: 737711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 18:53:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:30.816372
License: Public Domain

108 F.3d 1374
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Harry T. KEELING, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-7634.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 13, 1997.Decided March 19, 1997.

Harry T. Keeling, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.  Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Keeling, Nos.  CR-93-62-R;  CA-96-622-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 11, 1996).  We deny Appellant's motion requesting transcripts at government expense because the appeal does not present a substantial question.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED