Court Opinion

ID: 7548123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:37:55.841052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:58.596485
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
From our review of the record, which includes the tape recording of the polygraph examinations and the transcript of appellee’s confessions which immediately followed, we cannot say that the court erred in suppressing the confessions as the product of an unacceptable level of psychological coercion exerted by the polygraph examiner on the appellee. See Brewer v. State, 386 So.2d 232 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.