Court Opinion

ID: 9680223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:26:12.892292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:25.963233
License: Public Domain

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice,
dissenting.
This is a case in which the Court simply disagrees with the trial court, so it substitutes its judgment for that of the trial court. The Court has confused the burden of proof at a trial on the merits and the burden of proof to prove entitlement to a temporary injunction. Because the evidence of whether there was a vote on whether to issue the stock was disputed, and/or the evidence of the fairness of the transaction was also disputed, I cannot hold the trial court abused its discretion by denying the temporary injunction. We do not have the time, the resources, the duty, or the right to micromanage the trial court process. I would not in this instance.
I respectfully dissent.