Court Opinion

ID: 9672251
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:51:34.862173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:36.711786
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Curry argues on rehearing that it was improper for this Court to reverse the trial court’s judgment based on a characterization *621of McBryde’s claims as something other than a counterclaim or cross-claim because McBryde failed to raise this issue in the trial court. McBryde raised this issue at his earliest opportunity, however, in his motion for a new trial following the summary judgment. Because McBryde preserved this error with his motion for rehearing, this Court did not err by considering it on appeal. Accordingly, Curry’s motion for rehearing is overruled. January 17,1996.