Court Opinion

ID: 8064025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:42:42.332817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:06.848809
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
This case was argued with the case of Newark v. Tunis, ante p. 461, decided at the present term. It is similar in its essential facts, and is controlled by the decision in the Tunis case. For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that ease, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chaftcelloe, Chief Justice, Tbeftchakd, Paekee, Beegeft, Bogeet, Yeedeftbuegh, Congdoft, White, JJ. 9.
For reversal—None.