Court Opinion

ID: 800635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-05-21 19:57:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:12.889605
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            MAY 21 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 11-10567

                Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01207-DCB

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
JUSTO REVOLORIO-GONZALEZ,

                Defendant - Appellant.

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                               for the District of Arizona
                     Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge, Presiding **

                               Submitted May 15, 2012 ***

Before:         CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

       Justo Revolorio-Gonzalez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

          **
           Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of
North Dakota, sitting by designation.
          ***
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
15-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Revolorio-Gonzalez’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                    11-10567