Court Opinion

ID: 1004243
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:30.215319+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:39.255262
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6133

WILLIAM A. ROSS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
NORTH CAROLINA,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-200-3-1-MU)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                    Decided:   May 4, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Michael F. Easley, Clarence Joe
DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William A. Ross seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Ross’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court.   Ross v. North Caro-

lina, No. CA-00-200-3-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2000).    We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2