Court Opinion

ID: 8416016
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:07:48.699911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:15.680053
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord*510ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CA-90-4-L (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.