Court Opinion

ID: 994082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:17:29.089525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:56.221385
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES FELTON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-88, CA-96-484-R)

Submitted:   January 15, 1998             Decided:   January 27, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Felton, Nos. CR-93-88; CA-96-484-R (W.D.
Va. Jan. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2