Court Opinion

ID: 5821900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 21:11:33.188833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:09.834320
License: Public Domain

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 23, 1975, convicting him of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By order dated March 1, 1976, this court reversed the judgment, on the law, and dismissed the indictment. On May 12, 1977 the Court of Appeals modified the order of this court and remitted the case to this court for its review of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.15 (see CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]) and for further proceedings with respect to the sentence (see CPL 470.20, subd 4) should the facts be found favorably to the People (People v Dlugash, 41 NY2d 725, revg 51 AD2d 974). Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction to one for attempted murder. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for resentencing (see CPL 470.20, subd 4). A review of the record indicates that while the trial evidence adduced was not sufficient to support defendant’s guilt of the crime of murder, under the law as laid down by the Court of Appeals, it is sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt to establish his guilt of attempted murder. The contention that our modification of the verdict would be tantamount to depriving defendant of a jury trial may not now be given acceptance by this court since the same contention was urged by the defendant in his brief to the Court of Appeals and was clearly rejected by that court under the terms of its remand to this court. Martuscello, J. P., Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.