Court Opinion

ID: 3122123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:19:30.849224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:15.303538
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued August 23, 2012.

                                       In The
                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The
                           First District of Texas

                               NO. 01-12-00441-CV
                                    ____________

     RUSSELL & SMITH FORD, INC. d/b/a RUSSELL & SMITH AUTO
                       GROUP, Appellant

                                         V.

UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY AND
      ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

                     On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
                              Harris County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. 2010-43037

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Russell & Smith Ford, Inc. d/b/a Russell & Smith Auto Group

attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment signed July 14, 2011.
      Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is

signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). The deadline to file a notice of appeal is

extended to 90 days after the date the judgment is signed if any party timely files a

motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under

certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. To

be considered timely, a motion for new trial must be filed within 30 days after the

judgment is signed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a).

      The record reflects that the trial court signed the final summary judgment

order in the underlying trial court case on July 14, 2011. On September 15, 2011,

appellant filed a sworn no-notice-of-judgment motion in the trial court, indicating

that appellant did not receive notice of the final judgment until September 12, 2011.

On September 30, 2011, the trial court granted that motion and extended all

deadlines pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a(4), which provides that

all deadlines will run from the date that the party received notice–here, September

12, 2011.   Therefore, a motion for new trial, if any, was due 30 days after

September 12, 2011, by October 12, 2011. The record shows that appellant timely

filed a motion for new trial on September 30, 2011, which extended the deadline for

filing the notice of appeal to 90 days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellant’s

notice of appeal was therefore due by December 12, 2011.

                                         2
        Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until May 1, 2012. This Court can

extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the motion to extend is filed within

fifteen days after the initial deadline for filing the notice of appeal–here, by

December 27, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Once the fifteen-day period for

granting a motion for extension of time has passed, a party can no longer invoke the

appellate court’s jurisdiction. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.

1997).

        Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed. Without a timely filed

notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.1.

        On July 11, 2012, we denied appellant’s motion to extend time to file the

notice of appeal to May 1, 2012 and notified appellant that the appeal was subject to

dismissal for want of jurisdiction. More than ten days have passed since appellant

was given notice that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction.

        Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

                                          3