Court Opinion

ID: 4646837
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-25 03:00:50.822746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:44:41.257610
License: Public Domain

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE
             C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS
                          ________________________

                               No. ACM 39736
                          ________________________

                            UNITED STATES
                                Appellee
                                      v.
                         Zachre M. HAYES
             Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
                          ________________________

        Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
                        Decided 22 December 2020
                          ________________________

Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia.
Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 300
months, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 27 February 2019 by
GCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan.
For Appellant: Major Benjamin H. DeYoung, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Brian C. Mason, USAF; Mary Ellen
Payne, Esquire.
Before MINK, KEY, and ANNEXSTAD, Appellate Military Judges.
                          ________________________

    This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
    precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
                       ________________________

PER CURIAM:
    The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-
ror materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles
59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).
                     United States v. Hayes, No. ACM 39736

Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.). Accordingly, the ap-
proved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED. *

                  FOR THE COURT

                  CAROL K. JOYCE
                  Clerk of the Court

* As noted by Appellant’s counsel in the Merits Brief, the court-martial order (CMO)
correctly states that Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to Charge II, but then in-
correctly states that Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the Specification of Charge
II. We direct a corrected CMO to remedy the error.

                                          2