Court Opinion

ID: 1004096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:25.927163+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:30.447472
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

STEPHEN PAUL SELLECK,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-95-80-V, CA-99-479-3-V-2)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., RUDOLF, MAHER, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Brian Lee Whisler,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Stephen Paul Selleck seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Selleck, Nos. CR-95-80-V;

CA-99-479-3-V-2 (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 13, 2000; entered Nov. 16,

2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2