Court Opinion

ID: 4220838
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-16 14:06:40.398548+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:19.511240
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )
v. § I.D. Nos. 1208019349
) 1210019843
JAWAN D. HAMILTON, §
Defendant. §
ORDER

This 14th day of November, 2017, upon the Department of Correction’s
(“DOC”) application pursuant to ll Del. C. § 42l7 to modify Defendant JaWan D.
Hamilton’s (“Hamilton”) Level V sentence imposed by the Court on July l9, 2013;
the Board of Parole’s (“BOP”) recommendation that the Court grant the application;
the State’s response in opposition to the application, and the record in this case, it
appears to the Court that:

l. Hamilton pled guilty to Drug Dealing and Possession of a Firearm by a
Person Prohibited. He Was sentenced on July l9, 2013, effective October 28, 2012,
to a total of 18 years at Level V, suspended after serving eight years at Level V for
decreasing levels of supervision. Of the eight years Hamilton Was sentenced to
serve at Level V, three years Were a minimum mandatory sentence.

2. Hamilton has filed a total of three sentence modification motions under

Rule 35. The first Was denied on October 23 , 2013, however, Hamilton Was granted

leave to file a subsequent Rule 35(b) motion upon the completion of the minimum
mandatory portion of his sentence. Shortly thereafter, another Rule 35(b) motion
Was denied on November 15, 2013. Finally, his third motion Was denied on March
ll, 2016 by this Court as both procedurally barred and Without merit.l The Court
considered the merits of the motion because the sentencing judge had granted
Hamilton, leave to file a successive Rule 35(b) motion after serving his minimum
mandatory sentence, and that minimum mandatory period had been served.

3. On August l, 2017, DOC submitted an application for sentence
modification on Hamilton’s behalf under ll Del. C. 4217. That section permits
DOC to submit an application for sentence modification for “good cause shown”
Which certifies that the inmate’s release “shall not constitute a substantial risk to the
community or the defendant’s own self.”2 “Good cause” includes rehabilitation of
the offender.3 The application makes the required certification and cites Hamilton’s
good behavior, that he earned his GED, and the amount of time he has served
compared to the time remaining on his sentence. With respect to the last factor, it
appears that Hamilton’s Adjusted Release Date is November lO, 2019. DOC

recommends that the balance of Hamilton’s sentence be suspended upon successlial

 

' State v. Hamilton, ID No. 12008019349, D.l. 53.
2 ll Del C. § 4217(b).
3 ll Del. C. § 4217(0).

completion of the KEY program, that any remaining balance be served at Level IV
CREST, and that upon successful completion of CREST, that Hamilton serve any
remaining time at Level III CREST aftercare.

4. BOP voted to recommend a modification to what amounts to time
served at Level V followed by eight months of Level IV Work Release, followed by
Level III. Like DOC, BOP notes that Hamilton has completed Thresholds,
Altematives to Violence, My Brother’s Keeper, and Automotive Class. It is not clear
why BOP’s recommendation deviates from DOC’s.

5. The State opposes a reduction noting that, in denying a previous Rule
35(b) motion in 2016 the Court found that the original sentence was appropriate.

6. Having considered all of the above, the Court has determined to modify
Hamilton’s sentence in accordance with the recommendation of DOC. In contrast
to DOC’s application, the 2016 motion requested a suspension of Hamilton’s Level
V sentence for Level IV Home Confinement, with Hamilton to be held at Level III
until Level IV Home Confinement was available. The Court denied that motion on
March 11, 2016. Since then, Hamilton has served an additional 20 months at Level
V. While the Court still believes the original sentence was an appropriate one, it
also believes that the modified sentence ordered here, based on DOC’s

recommendation, including its certification that Hamilton does not pose a significant

risk to the community and its recommendation that he complete the KEY/CREST
continuum also is an appropriate sentence, but a preferable one.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application of the
Department of Correction pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 4217 to modify Defendant Jawan
Hamilton’s Level V sentence is GRANTED. The Defendant’s sentence as to
IN13-01-1413 Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited is modified as
follows: The Defendant is placed in the custody of the Department of Correction for
eight (8) years at supervision Level V with credit for six (6) days previously served,
the first three (3) years of which is a minimum mandatory period of incarceration,
suspended after three (3) years at supervision Level V U successful completion of
the KEY program, for the balance at supervision Level IV CREST, suspended upon
successful completion for one (1) year at supervision Level III CREST aftercare.
All other terms and conditions of the Defendant’s sentence in ID NO. 1208019349

are unchanged A new sentencing order shall issue.

Fer is W.'Whl£“ton',/Judge

Original to Prothonotary

cc: Andrew J. Vella, Esquire, Deputy Attomey General
Jawan Hamilton
Board of Parole
Investigative Services