Court Opinion

ID: 4361635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-01-24 17:09:17.206489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:34.884274
License: Public Domain

People v King (2019 NY Slip Op 00537)

People v King

2019 NY Slip Op 00537

Decided on January 24, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 24, 2019

Sweeny, J.P., Tom, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

8204 2612/14 178/14

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vKryzie King, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Loran Palmer of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell-Urban of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered October 21, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 24, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.