Court Opinion

ID: 8375017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-21 00:00:31.394491+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:27.051373
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40143      Document: 00516515939         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/20/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  No. 22-40143                         October 20, 2022
                                Summary Calendar
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose A. Hyrtado,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:21-CR-879-1

   Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose A. Hyrtado
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hyrtado has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-40143     Document: 00516515939          Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/20/2022

                                   No. 22-40143

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2