Court Opinion

ID: 8247442
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 09:40:58.272848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:49.244510
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, JUSTICE,
dissenting.
[¶ 10] I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 11] The majority reverses on an issue not properly before us.
[¶ 12] The issues identified in the appellant’s brief are its issues on appeal. See N.D.R.App.P. 28. The only issue identified in the appellant’s brief is “Were the Findings and Order dated May 6, 2015, supported by clear and convincing evidence?” The adequacy of the findings was not an issue identified. On the issue properly before us, clear and convincing evidence supports the findings and order.
[¶ 13] I would affirm.
[¶ 14] DALE V. SANDSTROM.