Court Opinion

ID: 2905760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:25:51.310118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:12.347856
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-140 CV

____________________

THERESA HAYNES, Appellant

V.

SUSAN ESCOBAR AND ARNOLD ESCOBAR, Appellees

On Appeal from the 284th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 04-02-01229-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
	On May 25, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want
of prosecution unless the filing fee was paid and arrangements were made for filing the
record or the appellant explained why she needed time for filing the record.  Appellant did
not respond.  The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs.  Tex. R. App.
P. 20.1.  The filing fee not having been paid, and there being no satisfactory explanation for
the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App.
P. 37.3(b).  Costs are assessed against appellant.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.

								____________________________
									CHARLES KREGER
										Justice

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006 
Before Gaultney, Kreger and Horton, JJ.