Court Opinion

ID: 550992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:08:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:46.947431
License: Public Domain

918 F.2d 174Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Otis Donald WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.John DOE, United States of America, District of Maryland,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-7101.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.Decided Nov. 14, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-90-29-B)
Otis Donald Witherspoon, appellant pro se.
Roann Nichols, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Otis Donald Witherspoon appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Witherspoon v. Doe, CA-90-29-B (D.Md. June 18, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.