Court Opinion

ID: 92479
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:05:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:38.263849
License: Public Domain

130 U.S. 341 (1889)
BROCK
v.
NORTHWESTERN FUEL COMPANY.
No. 210.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued and Submitted March 19, 1889.
Decided April 8, 1889.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA.
*342 Mr. Charles A. Clark for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. C.D. O'Brien submitted for defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN stated the case as above reported and delivered the opinion of the court.
The act of 1875 declares that no Circuit or District Court shall have "cognizance of any suit founded on contract in favor of an assignee, unless a suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover thereon if no assignment had been made, except in cases of promissory notes negotiable by the law merchant and bills of exchange." 18 Stat. 470. It does not appear that the What Cheer Land and Coal Company, the plaintiffs' assignor, could have brought suit on the contract in question, if no assignment had been made. The record does not show of what State it is a corporation. The allegation that it was "doing business in the State of Iowa" does not necessarily import that it was created by the laws of that State. But if that allegation were held sufficient to show it was an Iowa corporation, the result would be the same, because, in that case, it would appear that the parties to the original contract were all citizens of Iowa, and consequently that the assignor could not have sued the defendants in the Circuit Court of the United States.
The judgment is reversed upon the ground that it does not *343 appear, affirmatively, from the record that the Circuit Court had jurisdiction, Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U.S. 588, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law.
Reversed.