Court Opinion

ID: 9665635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:53:26.829523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:17.208788
License: Public Domain

*538aThe following memorandum was filed December 22, 1967.
Per Curiam (on motion for rehearing). In its brief in support of its motion for rehearing, the state contends the mandate is inconsistent with the opinion filed. However, the state is in error in assuming that the affirmance of the order of the trial court remanding the matter to the Wisconsin tax appeals commission requires the commission to determine the value of the stock. It was our intention that upon remand the commission would enter findings, conclusions and an order consistent with our opinion that no assessment was proper at the time the options were exercised.
Motion denied without costs.