Court Opinion

ID: 9716153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 06:28:41.567331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:42.389143
License: Public Domain

Murphy, P.J.
(concurring). I concur in affirming in part and reversing in part. Summary disposition in favor of defendants was appropriate because the period of limitations had expired, Garg v Macomb Co Community Mental Health Services, 472 Mich 263; 696 NW2d 646 (2005), amended 473 Mich 1205 (2005); Terlecki v *302Stewart, 278 Mich App 644; 754 NW2d 899 (2008), and the claim was untimely under MCL 600.5805(10). Further, I agree with the majority that summary disposition under the facts presented was not premature. I also agree with the majority’s discussion regarding governmental immunity and inverse condemnation, as well as its analysis of the attorney fee and cost issues. I fail to see any point, however, in citing unpublished opinions in this appeal when published opinions with precedential value exist.