Court Opinion

ID: 3321125
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:38:43.129205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:35:09.836470
License: Public Domain

Catherine F. Fagan, mother of the plaintiff, died November 23d 1916, leaving a will the material provisions of which are as follows:
"I give, devise and bequeath to my husband Edward F. Fagan, the life use of all my property, both real and personal.
"At the death of said husband, all property, both real and personal, shall pass to my son Joseph F. Keeley.
"Should the said Joseph F. Keeley die before the said husband Edward F. Fagan, leaving a child, or children, the estate shall pass to them, at the death of the said husband.
"In the event of the death of the said Joseph F. Keeley, without issue, the estate shall pass to my niece Dorothy Keane."
The real estate which is the subject of the contract was owned by Mrs. Fagan at her decease, and on August 28th, 1917, a certificate of the Court of Probate that, in her will, this property was devised to the plaintiff, subject to the life use of Edward F. Fagan, was executed and recorded. The plaintiff was married in 1915, and has two children, born September 11th, 1916, and October 3d 1919, respectively. Dorothy Keane, the niece mentioned in the will, is a daughter of the testatrix's sister. Edward F. Fagan, husband of the testatrix, died September 30th, 1926. On October 14th, 1926, the plaintiff and defendant executed an agreement that the plaintiff would sell this real estate to the defendant and the defendant would purchase it from the plaintiff. The sole inquiry reserved for our advice is: Has the plaintiff, Joseph F. *Page 744 
Keeley, a title in fee simple absolute in the real estate described in the complaint?
The only question which might now affect the plaintiff's title is whether the gift over to Dorothy Keane, in the event of the death of Joseph F. Keeley without issue, cuts down the prior devise of the fee to him. A situation similar in all material respects to that here presented was under consideration in Scanlin v. Peterson,ante, 308, 135 A. 394, decided since the instant case was reserved, and the rules therein reiterated and applied are germane to and decisive of the present inquiry. The provision that in the event of the death of Keeley, the prior devisee in fee, the estate shall pass to Dorothy Keane, is to be construed as applying only in case of the death of Keeley in the lifetime of the testatrix. Since he survived her he took, and now has, an estate in fee, and we so answer the question propounded.
   No costs will be taxed in this court.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.