Court Opinion

ID: 5610648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 03:58:35.93441+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:05.902649
License: Public Domain

Bloodworth, J.
The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.
The demurrer was on the grounds that no cause of action was set out, and that it was apparent that the plaintiff was injured “as the result of his own action.” ■
T. F. Harrison, T. 8. Peebles Jr., for plaintiff, cited:
Lawrenceville Oil Mill v. Walton, 143 Ga. 259 (1); Williams v. Garbult Lumber Co., 132 Ga. 227.
W. K. Miller, for defendant, cited:
Bolden v. Central Ry. Co., 130 Ga. 456-7; Lee v. A. C. L. R. Co., 125 Ga. 655; Banks v. Schofield’s Sons Co., 126 Ga. 667; Southern Ry. Co. v. Hightower, 146 Ga. 279; W. & A. R. Co. v. Bradford, 113 Ga. 276; A. & C. Air-Line Ry. v. Ray, 70 Ga. 674 (3); Ga. R. Co. v. Nelms, 83 Ga. 70; R. & D. R. Co. v. Dickey, 90 Ga. 491 (2); Stewart v. S. A. L. Ry., 115 Ga. 624, 628; Southern Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 137 Ga. 704; Up-church v. Culpepper, 17 Ga. App. 577; Belk v. Lee Roy Myers Co., 17 Ga. App. 684; Williams v. A. C. L. R. Co., 18 Ga. App. 120.