Court Opinion

ID: 9738849
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 20:04:24.140248+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:08.791184
License: Public Domain

WUEST Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur with the majority opinion except that portion which vests the trial court with the discretionary power to determine the feasibility of White Man’s reinstatement. In my opinion, White Man is entitled to reinstatement and, under the facts of this case, the trial court has no discretion. Jager v. Ramona Bd. of Educ., 444 N.W.2d 21 (S.D.1989); Reid v. Huron Bd. of Educ., 449 N.W.2d 240 (S.D.1989).