Court Opinion

ID: 2843631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 15:46:00.316214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:13.229234
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued May 20, 2010
 

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas

NO. 01-10-00370-CV

IN RE JOSEPH KOYITHARA, JAMES OLIYIL, BIJO MATHEW, AND
ANIS IBRAHIM, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION  (1)

By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Joseph Koyithara, James Oliyil,
Bijo Mathew, and Anis Ibrahim, challenge the trial court's order, rendered orally,
requiring the parties to pay an advance payment for receiver fees.     
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.  All outstanding motions are
overruled as moot. 
Per Curiam 

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Higley.

1. 	The underlying case is John Uralil, Beny Peedikayil, and George Naduparambil v.
Joseph Koyithara, James Oliyil, Bijo Mathew, and Anis Ibrahim, No. 2009-55777
in the 164th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Alexandra
Smoots-Hogan, presiding.