Court Opinion

ID: 9833048
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:23:58.997945+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:45.239113
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing, appellees -earnestly insist that we erred in considering any of appellants’ assignmehts of error. In view of the fact that the trial court could not have rendered its judgment dismissing the cause for want of jurisdiction without holding that the interest prayed for was no part of the damages, it is the view of the majority that the questions decided were sufficiently assigned. But, regardless of this, we all agree that the error of the trial court is apparent from a consideration of the pleadings and the judgment, without reference to the statement of facts, and that our former disposition of the case was correct, aside from the question of whether the assignments of error were sufficient.
The motion for rehearing will accordingly be overruled.