Court Opinion

ID: 9651944
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 17:01:58.741172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:12:44.102379
License: Public Domain

KUHN, J.,
concurring.
11 Defendants effectively waived their entitlement to nullity relief for the amended final judgment by failing to assert the impropriety of the March 29, 2007 amendment in the prior litigation because both the March 23 and March 29, 2007 judgments were contained in that earlier record. La. C.C.P. art. 2005. Whether the principles that govern absolutely null contracts are applicable to null judgments is not an issue before this court in this appeal and, therefore, any discussion is merely dicta. Accordingly, I concur in the affir-mance of the trial court’s judgment.