Court Opinion

ID: 9406710
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-03 13:00:56.543017+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:32.738854
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-13516    Document: 58-1     Date Filed: 07/03/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 20-13516
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       MICHAEL WILLIAMS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Georgia
                 D.C. Docket No. 4:19-cr-00089-LGW-CLR-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-13516      Document: 58-1     Date Filed: 07/03/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 20-13516

       Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Dennis A. O’Brien, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Wil-
       liams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
       further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and
       sentence are AFFIRMED.