Court Opinion

ID: 9665107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:40:11.867585+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:13.106190
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
In its motion for rehearing, Employer questions the statement in this court’s opinion, “Employer does not contend it responded to the notice as instructed either before the scheduled time for the hearing or at the scheduled time.” Employer suggests this court ignored the allegation in its application for review that Employer’s representative notified the appeals tribunal that Employer wanted to participate in the telephone hearing and left a telephone number for that purpose.
Employer’s pleading does not allege it responded to the notice in the manner the notice directed, viz., by providing a “telephone number for the hearing by calling 1-800-533-6413.” Employer’s pleading does not allege Employer complied with the directive to contact the appeals tribunal at the 1-800 number. The record does not reveal *563that it did so. Employer’s motion for rehearing is denied.