Court Opinion

ID: 2965062
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:34:44.239221+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:21.008060
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-2035

                                  FAROUK O. MARTINS,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                         CHARLES HAYDEN GOODWILL INN SCHOOL,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Farouk Martins on brief pro se.
            ______________
            Andrew L. Matz,  Bret A. Cohen and Stoneman, Chandler & Miller LLP
            ______________   _____________     _______________________________
        on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                   January 28, 1998
                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and
                 ___________

            the record on appeal.   We affirm essentially for the reasons

            stated  in the district  court's memoranda and  orders, dated

            July 14, 1997 and July 28, 1997.

                 We deny  the appellee's request  that we enter  an order

            preventing appellant from further court action based upon the

            same underlying  facts.   Such  a  request is  more  properly

            addressed to  the district court  in the event of  any future

            filing.  We  decline to  remark upon  the appropriateness  of

            granting such a request and  leave it to the district court's

            discretion if and when the occasion for consideration arises.

                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                 _________

                                         -2-