Court Opinion

ID: 9683250
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 13:25:26.152468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:46.721892
License: Public Domain

Gerrard, J.,
dissenting.
I agree with the general principle that an order that is ancillary and accessory to a judgment that has been reversed shares its fate and falls with it. See Upah v. Ancona Bros. Co., 246 Neb. 608, 521 N.W.2d 906 (1994). However, I would affirm the judgment underlying the district court’s order in this case. See Gary’s Implement v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, ante p. 286, 702 N.W.2d 355 (2005) (Gerrard, J., dissenting). Therefore, I respectfully dissent.