Court Opinion

ID: 4611896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-20 19:49:57.51643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:54:20.714708
License: Public Domain

APPEAL OF LOUIS GOLDBLOOM.Goldbloom v. CommissionerDocket No. 6152.United States Board of Tax Appeals4 B.T.A. 149; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2365; June 21, 1926, Decided Submitted January 26, 1926.  *2365 Louis Goldbloom pro se.  George G. Witter, Esq., for the Commissioner.  *149  Before LANSDON and ARUNDELL.  This is an appeal from the determination of deficiencies in income taxes for 1919, 1920, and 1921, in the respective amounts of $569, $114.52, and $70.33.  No deficiency letter in respect to the tax for 1919 has been issued and the hearing was therefore restricted to the deficiencies alleged for the years 1920 and 1921.  No satisfactory proof was offered as to the amount spent as ordinary and necessary expenses.  FINDINGS OF FACT.  The taxpayer is an individual residing in Pittsburgh, Pa., where he is employed as a traveling salesman by the American Trouser Co.  During the taxable years his compensation was 5 per cent of his gross sales, from which he paid his own traveling expenses and cost of subsistence while engaged in selling the merchandise of his employer in the territory assigned to him.  In 1920 he was on the road for 40 weeks, traveling to Detroit, Cleveland, and many other cities in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and other States.  In 1921 he was so employed for not less than 21 weeks.  He claims deductions from gross income for the years*2366  in question in the respective amounts of $2,500 and $1,395.50, incurred and paid as ordinary and necessary expenses in carrying on his business.  The deficiencies for 1920 and 1921 are $114.52 and $70.33, respectively.  Order will be entered accordingly.