Court Opinion

ID: 8473117
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 13:22:32.687942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:22.192729
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arnold, No. 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.