Court Opinion

ID: 3107328
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:12:39.185607+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:25.189930
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00635-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

MAXINE C. VALENZUELA,                                                      Appellant,

                                          v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

               On appeal from 36th District Court
                 of San Patricio County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Maxine C. Valenzuela, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                                             PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
17th day of March, 2011.

                                           2