Court Opinion

ID: 52686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:18:18+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:45.798434
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                 FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             MAY 16, 2007
                              No. 06-13935                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                   D. C. Docket No. 04-00062-CR-5-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

DUSTIN A. CRUMBLEY,

                                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                               (May 16, 2007)

Before BIRCH, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for Dustin A. Crumbley in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because the

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crumbley’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                          2