Court Opinion

ID: 9396884
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-23 21:00:36.72698+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:19.984421
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7035        Doc: 12         Filed: 05/22/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                               UNPUBLISHED

                                 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                     FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                                 No. 22-7035

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

                        v.

        DARRELL T. WASHINGTON, a/k/a D-Black,

                               Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of South Carolina, at
        Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-02064-JFA-10)

        Submitted: May 18, 2023                                               Decided: May 22, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. ∗

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Darrell T. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United
        States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
        Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

        ∗
            The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7035      Doc: 12         Filed: 05/22/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Darrell T. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a

        sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132

        Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

        we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Washington, No.

        3:11-cr-02064-JFA-10 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because

        the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

        and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2