Court Opinion

ID: 4208319
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-02 19:01:00.625393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:39.338118
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

 
   *94
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  ’ Andrew J. Danzell appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.
  
   United States v. Danzell,
  
  Nos. 7:05-cv-00024-GEC-MFU-1; 7:09-cv-80196-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED