Court Opinion

ID: 8680205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:41:07.341432+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.767153
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *788error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ellis v. Lewis, No. 5:12-ct-03122-FL, 2015 WL 5714874 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2015). We deny Ellis’ motion to appoint counsel and for the release of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.