Court Opinion

ID: 7130602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 15:18:23.910236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:14:27.373179
License: Public Domain

JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
The record of the Indiana judgment in the appellee’s favor against the appellant is sufficiently authenticated for sustaining this action upon it in the circuit court for Harrison county, Kentucky; and, though the judgment is apparently harsh and erroneous, yet, not being revisable by this court, it must operate as valid and conclusive until reversed in Indiana.
But the appellant’s separate suit against the appellee in Indiana, on their contract of assignment, never having been tried on its merits, the simple dismission of it for alleged want of prosecution is no bar to farther remedy upon the same cause of action; and, consequently, the *21non-resident appellee, not being suable here by original process, the appellant may, as attempted by his answer in this case, plead, as a counter-claim, his cause of action on the assignment hitherto unlitigated; and, therefore, as the answer - apparently presents an available counterclaim, the circuit court erred in sustaining a demurrer to it.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.