Court Opinion

ID: 4907125
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-03 05:59:15.649849+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:10.464852
License: Public Domain

Willson, Judge.
This is a conviction for the violation of the local option law. Numerous errors are assigned and urged against the validity of the conviction, several of which attack the legality of the election adopting said law in the precinct in which the offense is alleged "to have occurred. It is not necessary to a disposition of this appeal that we should notice and determine these supposed errors. We find, upon an inspection of the record, that the State failed to prove on the trial that, in ordering the election, the commissioners court acted upon a valid petition,—that is, a petition signed by the requisite number of qualified voters in the justice’s precinct for which said election was ordered. (Rev. Stat., art. 3227.) There is a petition set forth in the statement of facts, but there is no proof that it was signed by twenty, or any other number, of qualified voters of said justice’s precinct. It was incumbent upon the State to show a valid petition in order to show the jurisdiction of the commissioners court to order said election. (McMillan v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 375.)
Because in this particular the evidence does not sustain the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.