Court Opinion

ID: 4401882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-30 15:52:07.164984+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:45:58.960587
License: Public Domain

People v Rodriguez (2019 NY Slip Op 04276)

People v Rodriguez

2019 NY Slip Op 04276

Decided on May 30, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 30, 2019

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

9477 1409/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vRogelio Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Vang of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Aaron Zucker of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered April 28, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MAY 30, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.