Court Opinion

ID: 989492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:07:42.717856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:14.725960
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-6171

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

WARDEN WATERS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF MARYLAND,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-95-2901)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                    Decided:   June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Richmond v. Waters, No. CA-95-2901 (D. Md. Jan. 22, 1996).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2