Court Opinion

ID: 989231
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:03:38.731981+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:34.600903
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7923

ARNOLD LYNN PARKS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LEWIS BARLOW,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-95-525)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Lynn Parks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parks v. Barlow, No.
CA-95-525 (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2