Court Opinion

ID: 6314322
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 20:21:50.218544+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:11.930687
License: Public Domain

Pep. Cueiam.
This case is not distinguishable from Flick v. Boucher, 16 Serg. & Rawle, 373, where the defendant having been the appellant at every stage, succeeded finally in abating the judgment of the justice by obtaining a nonsuit. Here he did so by a verdict and judgment on the merits; and that is the only difference. The judgment, so far as it allows the plaintiff the costs before the justice, is erroneous; but as this writ of error, is brought by the plaintiff, the defendant can have no advantage from it.
Judgment affirmed. ■