Court Opinion

ID: 9656968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 20:09:39.927186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:39.315731
License: Public Domain

HENDERSON, Justice
(concurring in result).
Majority writer cites his singular dissenting opinion in Bol. As the language in the Bol will is not present in the will before us, it is a totally inapposite citation. Perforce, the dissenting opinion cannot be authority because the two cases have different pillars. In reading over the briefs herein, I note that neither party cited or relied upon Bol. I am convinced that the trial judge made a decision, founded upon past precedent, and agree that this Court should affirm the decision. Interweaving inapposite authority, consisting of approximately 300 words in a footnote, seems to prolong, unnecessarily, an otherwise sound legal journey.
WUEST, Justice, joins this special writing and I am authorized to so state.