Court Opinion

ID: 988678
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:55:41.9453+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:26.638731
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7635

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X,      formerly   known   as
Michael W. Montgomery,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM M. CATOE, JR.,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. C. Weston Houck, Chief District
Judge. (MISC-95-160)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. X v. Catoe, No.
MISC-95-160 (D.S.C. Oct. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2