Court Opinion

ID: 8912014
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 03:22:46.029363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:36.679257
License: Public Domain

TANG, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I concur. I note, however, that even if the grand jury foreman had not told Smith that he would be required to appear in the future, I would still hold that Smith’s appeal was not moot. See Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 416 U.S. 115, 94 S.Ct. 1694, 40 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974); Matter of the Special September 1978 Grand Jury (II) (Wall), 590 F.2d 245 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 944, 99 S.Ct. 2162, 60 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1979).