Court Opinion

ID: 6470572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-26 14:15:01.923465+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:53:47.914140
License: Public Domain

SUTIN, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I dissent in part. There is no evidence that defendant entered the home of the prosecutrix with intent to commit any felony or theft contrary to § 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl. Vol. 6). To relate the evidence would be useless. State v. Slade, 78 N.M. 581, 434 P.2d 700 (Ct.App.1967). I concur in the conviction under § 40A-9-9, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6).