Court Opinion

ID: 670860
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:39:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:12.124040
License: Public Domain

25 F.3d 1038NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles M. BYERS, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Michael H. DOHERTY;  Thomas W. Barham;  Charles McDonnell;Kermit A. Rosenberg;  Robert P. Holmes;  Radigan,Rosenberg & Holmes, P.C.;  Barham &Radigan, P.C., Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-1615.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  January 10, 1994.Decided:  May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.  T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.  (CA-93-295)
Charles M. Byers, Appellant Pro Se.
Antonia Beatrice Ianniello, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his legal malpractice action.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Byers v. Doherty, No. CA-93-295 (E.D. Va.  May 4, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED