Court Opinion

ID: 9407076
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-05 19:09:26.98986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:35.124261
License: Public Domain

STATE        OF    LOUISIANA                                                             NO.    2023       KW    0352

VERSUS

CHRISTOPHER             PERKINS                                                                JULY       5,     2023

In    Re:           Christopher          Perkins,            applying       for      supervisory                 writs,

                    21st       Judicial          District        Court,        Parish           of    Tangipahoa,
                   No.     703- 176.

BEFORE:            LANIER,       HESTER,         AND    MILLER,      JJ.

         WRIT       DENIED       ON   THE       SHOWING MADE.            Relator          failed          to    include
the district court' s ruling, the court minutes                                           from the             February
16, 2023  hearing,   the  State' s response, if                                          any,        the        bill    of

information,               the        uniform          commitment          order,              and        any        other

portions           of    the     district         court'     s   record     that         might        support          the
claims        raised        in    the       writ       application.            Therefore,                 this       court

cannot
        adequately                      review          the        ruling           at          issue           herein.
Supplementation of                    this      writ    application            and/ or          an    application

for  rehearing  will                   not      be     considered.             See        Uniform              Rules    of

Louisiana  Courts of                   Appeal,         Rules      2- 18. 7 &        4-    9.         In    the       event

relator           elects    to    file      a    new   application         with          this    court,          he may
do    so     without        the    necessity            of obtaining            a        return       date.            Any
future        filing       on    this issue            should include               the        entire          contents

of    this        application,
                                        the      missing         items     noted         above,           and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                       WIL
                                                        CHH
                                                        SMM

COURT       OF APPEAL,          FIRST    CIRCUIT
 N

     L   DEPUTY         CLERK    OF    COURT
         Q
                   FOR    THE    COURT