Court Opinion

ID: 8420277
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 20:17:34.965757+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:23.097454
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Eugene T. Holmes appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing several of Holmes’s claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order appealed from is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED