Court Opinion

ID: 6934439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:23:15.098642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:22.859679
License: Public Domain

CORRECTED ORDER
A member of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear this ease en bane. The poll failed to produce a majority of the court in favor of rehearing. Chief Judge Ervin and Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Wilkins, Michael and Motz voted to rehear this case en bane; Judges Russell, Widener, Niemeyer and Hamilton voted against rehearing this ease en bane. Judges Wilkinson, Luttig, and Williams disqualified themselves. Judge Motz wrote a separate dissent, in which Judge Hall, Judge Murnaghan, and Judge Michael joined.
Entered at the direction of Judge Niemeyer for the Court.