Court Opinion

ID: 8450459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:02:13.722996+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.075265
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Seneca Rayvon Allen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Allen, No. 1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.