Court Opinion

ID: 1010118
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:06:41.168834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:07.933530
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 03-6004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DANA LEONARD FISHER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-98-67, CA-01-130)

Submitted:   March 20, 2003                 Decided:   March 27, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Leonard Fisher, Appellant Pro Se.      Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

      Dana Leonard Fisher seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fisher

has   not   made   a   substantial   showing    of   the   denial   of   a

constitutional right.     See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S.Ct. 1029

(U.S. Feb. 25, 2003).       Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.          See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                               DISMISSED

                                     2