Court Opinion

ID: 8680880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:04:59.445636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.336448
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chántale Teta Maffo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative' record and Maffo’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Maffo *115(B.I.A. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED