Court Opinion

ID: 4505246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-02-06 17:00:22.530605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:18.679245
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 19-2020
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                                   Kendrick Dotstry

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                        ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                          for the District of Minnesota
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: January 30, 2020
                              Filed: February 6, 2020
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Kendrick Dotstry appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion. Upon careful review of the record, including the well-reasoned opinion of the

      1
       The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota.
district court, we conclude there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of post-
judgment relief. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005)
(court reviews denial of Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion; Rule 60(b)
authorizes relief in only most exceptional cases). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

                                        -2-