Court Opinion

ID: 6952035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:33:09.091954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:06.518796
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan from reunification to adoption. She argues, among other contentions, that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.449(2); ORS 419B.476(2), (5). The state concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to include the required findings and determinations. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J .F. B., 230 Or App 106, 115, 214 P3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the state’s concession. Given our remand, we do not reach the other issues mother raises on appeal. See id. at 118 (“The other issues raised by mother on appeal are premature at this time.”).
Reversed and remanded.