Court Opinion

ID: 6778599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:53:03.558633+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:50.115045
License: Public Domain

*27The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.
Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.