Court Opinion

ID: 8310286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 13:47:28.639456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:41.985459
License: Public Domain

Brewer, J., {orally.)
It is not because we think the counsel have not earned the amount reported by the master in their favor that we do not sustain this report in full; but we do not believe in the policy or propriety, pending a receivership, of making a large allowance to parties who are employed as officers of the court, or in looking after the interests of clients in that connection. They should wait until the matter comes to a close, and then their bills, as a whole, should be presented. The court can then look at them, and pass upon the question as to whether they are correct or not. It makes a great difference, practically, in the administration of affairs, whether parties present bills for two or three thousand dollars every three or four months, or at the end of the litigation for eight or ten thousand dollars. Wo do not mean that counsel shall go without compensation as the ease progresses, because they cannot afford to; but still these intermediate allowances will always be small, and will not be in the way of a determination of what the services up to that time are really worth, or what they should bo at the final disposition of the case. They will be simply in view of the necessities, so to speak, of counsel pending litigation; and while the master in this case recommends an allowance of $6,000, the order will be that these gentlemen be paid $2,000 on account. The matter will stand over until we come to the final disposition of th.e Wabash Case, and then all fees and claims will be presented, and it will be seen whether there are funds enough in the Wabash road to pay the expenses.