Court Opinion

ID: 993724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:11:55.876525+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:28.296434
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7188

WILLIAM CLINTON BLASSINGAME,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; STATE OF SOUTH CARO-
LINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-96-3020-08BD)

Submitted:   November 20, 1997         Decided:     December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Clinton Blassingame, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Blassingame v. Moore, No. CA-96-3020-08BD (D.S.C. July 31,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2