Court Opinion

ID: 5218376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:28:13.528355+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:28.630560
License: Public Domain

Rich, J.:
■The relator, who has served on the police force "of the city of New York for over four years, has been found guilty of conduct *67unbecoming an officer, in having assaulted two boys, both under the age of twelve years, without cause, striking one three times in the face with his fist, and throwing the other violently to the ground, and dismissed from, the force. The conviction was had upon the testimony of these two boys, which is contradictory, evasive and improbable; indeed, it is so unsatisfactory that the conviction ought not to stand, and this is especially true when we take into consideration the evidence of the five disinterested citizens who were eye-witnesses, and who corroborate the testimony of the relator himself.
The testimony so clearly establishes that the findings and determination of the respondent are against the weight of the evidence that it is not necessary to consider or to express our views upon the other questions presented by the learned counsel for the relator.
As was said in People ex rel. McAleer v. French (119 N.Y. 502, 507, 508): “ It is a mistake to suppose that if there is any evidence in the record brought to the Supreme Court by certiorari sustaining the determination of the commissioners, that court has no right to interfere therewith. * '* * In all this class of cases, it is the duty of the Supreme Court not only to inquire whether there is any competent proof tending to establish the guilt of the accused officer, but it must look into the evidence, and if it finds that there is a preponderance of evidence against the determination of the commissioners, then it has the same jurisdiction to reverse the determination that it has to set aside the verdict of a jury as against the weight of evidence.”
The determination of the commissioner must be reversed and annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the relator reinstated.
Jenks, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
Writ sustained, determination annulled, and relator reinstated, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.