Court Opinion

ID: 9756558
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 21:38:05.361812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:25.696195
License: Public Domain

Justice CASTILLE,
concurs.
The Per Curiam Opinion tracks the standard governing issuance of a Writ of Prohibition as I set it forth in my Dissenting Opinion in Public Defender’s Office of Venango County v. Venango County Court of Common Pleas, 893 A.2d 1275, 1282-1291 (2006) (Castille, J., dissenting). Because the Per Curiam Opinion explains why this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction under that standard is appropriate, and explains why prohibition must issue, I join. I view the exercise of jurisdiction in Venango County as aberrational.