Court Opinion

ID: 9964337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-29 18:10:52.787367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:19.438450
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Tenney, 2024-Ohio-1652.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                           ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                TRUMBULL COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                      CASE NO. 2024-T-0028

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                    Criminal Appeal from the
        - vs -                                      Court of Common Pleas

MICHAEL RUSSELL TENNEY,
                                                    Trial Court No. 2017 CR 00159
                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                        MEMORANDUM
                                          OPINION

                                        Decided: April 29, 2024
                                         Judgment: Dismissed

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160
High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Michael Russell Tenney, pro se, PID# A704-630, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701
Burnett Street, P.O. Box 901, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.

        {¶1}     On April 1, 2024, appellant, Michael Russell Tenney, pro se, filed a “Motion

for Leave of Appeal,” construed as a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal pursuant to

App.R. 5(A).

        {¶2}     No notice of appeal was filed with the Trumbull County Court of Common

Pleas, and no judgment entry being appealed was provided.                  However, appellant

indicates that he appeals the trial court’s February 21, 2024 entry denying his motion for

a final appealable order.
       {¶3}      Appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a response in opposition to the motion on

April 3, 2024.

       {¶4}      App.R. 5(A) provides:

       {¶5}      “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

       {¶6}      “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *

       {¶7}      “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right.

Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial

court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of the

notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. The movant also shall furnish an additional

copy of the notice of appeal and a copy of the motion for leave to appeal to the clerk of

the court of appeals who shall serve the notice of appeal and the motions upon the

prosecuting attorney.” (Emphasis added.)

       {¶8}      Appellant has not complied with App.R. 5(A) because he failed to file a

notice of appeal in the trial court concurrently with the filing of his motion for leave to

appeal with this court. See State v. Dougherty, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2023-G-0045,

2023-Ohio-4874; State v. Fisher, 46 Ohio App.2d 279 (1975).

       {¶9}      Thus, appellant’s pro se motion is overruled, and this matter is dismissed.

EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.
                                                2

Case No. 2024-T-0028