Court Opinion

ID: 6634885
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:39:27.660705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:07.453766
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the .authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Abstract 12951 embroidered laces and embroidered wearing apparel were held dutiable at "75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers like those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.