Court Opinion

ID: 8416495
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 16:34:07.090047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:16.433306
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Gaylon Ray Shirley appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging his three-strikes sentence for possession of cocaine for sale. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.
Shirley’s contention that his sentence of 28-years-to-life is grossly disproportionate in violation of the Eighth Amendment is unpersuasive in light of Lockyer v. Andrade, — U.S. -,---, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1172-75, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003) (holding that state court’s affirmance of two consecutive 25-years-to-life sentences for petty theft was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of federal law), and Ewing v. California, — U.S. -,---, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 1185-90, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (holding that a 25-years-to-life sentence under the California three-strikes law did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment). The district court therefore properly denied Shirley’s petition. Andrade, — U.S. at-, 123 S.Ct. at 1175.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.