Court Opinion

ID: 1020354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:49:42.818668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:54.241001
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 06-1051

RANDOLPH CREWS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

FIRST TRANSIT, Successor in Interest,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:05-
cv-02872-JFM)

Submitted: August 24, 2006                 Decided: August 28, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph Crews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Randolph Crews seeks to appeal the dismissal of his

complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim.    This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).   The order Crews seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order.   See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993).    Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                              - 2 -