Court Opinion

ID: 7156905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:11:36.56935+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:15.814923
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Holt :
It is admitted that the house and lot in contest was purchased by the appellant, Spencer Herreld, with money paid to him as one of its pensioners, by the United States Government; that he was a bona fide housekeeper with his family, of this commonwealth, at the time of the purchase; that from that time until this proceeding was instituted he had occupied the property as his homestead but that the appellee’s debt was created prior to the purchase.
The legislature may impose such restrictions upon an exemption •of property from liability for debt as it chooses; and it has seen fit *354to say that the homestead shall not be exempt as to a debt, which existed prior to its purchase. General Statutes, 1881, Chap. 38, Art. 13, Sec. 16.

Walker & Hubbard, H. P. Taylor, for appellant.

[Cited, Sims v. Walsham, 9 Ky. L. 912, 7 S. W. 557; Sanders v. Herndon, 122 Ky. 760, 29 Ky. L. 325, 93 S. W. 14, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1072, 121 Am. St. 493.]
This court has heretofore held that pension money is exempt only until it reaches the hands of the pensioner, yet it is liable for his debts, and as there was no immunity of this property either by the federal or state law, the judgment below is affirmed.
Robins v. Walker, 82. Ky. 60, 56 Am. Rep. 478. Hudspeth v. Harrison, &c., 13 Ky. Opin. 25.
Judgment affirmed.