Court Opinion

ID: 3088444
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:24:10.424268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:57.031182
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-12-00682-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

SUSANA FLORES,                                                                Appellant,

                                            v.

RAMIRO FLORES,                                      Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                   of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on June 13, 2013. On August

13, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed

and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the

Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 12th
day of September, 2013.

                                             2