Court Opinion

ID: 7351992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 02:39:53.359956+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:27.571960
License: Public Domain

SEABURY, J.
[1,2] This is an action to recover damages for conversion of two diamond earrings. The evidence shows that the earrings were converted by the defendant, but that the plaintiff waived the tort when he gave a receipt to. the defendant, which stated that the earrings had been sold by the plaintiff to the defendant and accepted $50 on account. The judgment appealed from contains a provision that the defendant is liable to arrest. This would be correct if the plaintiff had not waived the tort. We do not think it necessary to reverse the judgment, but under section 1317 of the Code of Civil Procedure we have power to provide that the judgment should be modified by striking out the provision “defendant liable to arrest.” As the tort was waived and the action is now regarded as upon contract, the defendant is entitled to credit for the $50 paid the plaintiff on account.
The judgment is modified by striking out the provision “defendant liable to arrest” and reducing the amount thereof to $210 and costs, with interest from July 22, 1911, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party upon this appeal. All concur.