Court Opinion

ID: 9725556
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 11:52:44.049401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:16.542471
License: Public Domain

Petition foe Rehearing
Bierly, J.
— Appellees and each of them pursuant to Rule 2-22 of the Supreme Court, filed a petition on December 23, 1966, for a rehearing of this cause “upon the ground that the Court’s decision in this cause is thought to be erroneous.” Also on said date, appellees filed in multiple an Appellees’ Brief in Support of the Petition for Rehearing.
Proof of Service was likewise submitted on said date.
The Court, having examined said Petition for Rehearing, and the Supporting Brief therefor, is of the opinion that said Petition for Rehearing should be denied.
*114Petition for Rehearing denied.
Done this 31st day of December, 1966.
Mote, P. J., concurs.
Carson, Faulconer, Prime and Smith, JJ., concur.
Wickens, C. J., and Hunter, J., not participating.
Note. — Reported in 221 N. E. 2d 696.