Court Opinion

ID: 7689747
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 18:34:41.472059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:40.460649
License: Public Domain

LAWRENCE, Judge,
concurring and dissenting.
I cannot agree that deemed earnings is a substantive right for some purposes, but a mere procedural device for other purposes. I nevertheless concur in the result, because reversal is required by precedent set in Wohlgamwth v. Central Maintenance & Welding, 600 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); and Braithwaite v. Department of Transportation, 622 So.2d 109, 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). I therefore join in the result.