Court Opinion

ID: 848396
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 23:41:55.443468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:39.197352
License: Public Domain

704 N.W.2d 695 (2005)
474 Mich. 879
Gary PITSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Daniel M. BLANDFORD, Defendant-Appellee.
Docket No. 127057. COA No. 248337.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 6, 2005.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals judgment, REINSTATE plaintiff's cause of action, and REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court for further proceedings. Inasmuch as defendant could have waived his statute of limitations affirmative defense, MCR 2.111(F)(3), it does not appear to offend any established public policy for defendant to take a less drastic step of tolling a statute of limitations by agreement. See Rory v. Continental Insurance Co., 473 Mich. 457, 703 N.W.2d 23, (2005). The parties' unambiguous agreement to toll the statute of limitations is to be enforced as written. The Court of Appeals independent assessment of the "reasonableness" of the parties' tolling agreement was unwarranted. Id. at 470, 703 N.W.2d 23. Because defendant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we also VACATE the award of attorney fees.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J. states as follows:
I would reverse the Court of Appeals judgment, reinstate plaintiff's cause of action, and remand this case to the Kent Circuit Court for further proceedings without the further statement found in the majority's order.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., joins the statement of MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J.