Court Opinion

ID: 9837982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-02 21:01:00.877655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.769663
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6372     Doc: 9         Filed: 09/01/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                           UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6372

        NESTOR LEON,

                            Petitioner - Appellant,

                     v.

        WARDEN,

                            Respondent - Appellee.

                                              No. 23-6373

        NESTOR LEON,

                            Petitioner - Appellant,

                     v.

        WARDEN,

                            Respondent - Appellee.

        Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
        at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00283-JPB-JPM; 5:22-cv-
        00243-JPB-JPM)

        Submitted: August 29, 2023                                  Decided: September 1, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6372      Doc: 9        Filed: 09/01/2023     Pg: 2 of 3

        Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Nestor Leon, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6372         Doc: 9      Filed: 09/01/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Nestor Leon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

        petitions for failure to pay the initial filing fees without prejudice. We have reviewed the

        record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.

        Leon v. Warden, Nos. 5:22-cv-00283-JPB-JPM; 5:22-cv-00243-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va.

        Feb. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

        are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

        decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     3