Court Opinion

ID: 1077761
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 20:24:27.147861+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:12.460680
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton
Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

PAMELA FLOOD
                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
v.         Record No. 0588-95-1      JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR.
                                            JUNE 11, 1996
EASTERN STATE HOSPITAL

         FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

           Gregory E. Camden (Rutter & Montagna, on
           brief), for appellant.
           A. Ann Berkebile, Assistant Attorney General
           (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General;
           Catherine C. Hammond, Deputy Attorney
           General; Gregory E. Lucyk, Senior Assistant
           Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

     Citing the requirement of Code § 65.2-406(A)(5) that "a

diagnosis of [a compensable] disease [must] first [be]

communicated to the employee," and holding that the opinion of

Mr. Huppert, a licensed clinical social worker, was insufficient

to satisfy this requirement, the commission ruled that the

claimant produced no proof of "a proper diagnosis and

communication" and thus failed to prove a compensable

occupational disease.    The commission erred in thus holding.

     A clinical social worker
          is professionally qualified at the autonomous
          practice level to provide direct diagnostic,
          preventive and treatment services where
          functioning is threatened or affected by
          social and psychological stress or health
          impairment.
     *
      Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
Code § 54.1-3700.   Thus, Mr. Huppert was not disqualified as a

matter of law from providing an acceptable diagnosis and

communication of acute anxiety reaction.

     The decision of the commission is reversed and this case is

remanded to the commission with direction to receive and consider

the opinion of Mr. Huppert, according to accepted standards of

factual review, and to ascertain the sufficiency of that opinion

to satisfy the requirements of Code § 65.2-406.

                                       Reversed and remanded.

                               - 2 -