Court Opinion

ID: 8421563
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 21:47:28.86677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:24.701865
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.*
Court-appointed counsel for appellant John Winston O’Dowd has moved for leave *1002to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). O’Dowd has filed a response and a motion for appointment of new counsel.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, O’Dowd’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.