Court Opinion

ID: 2963434
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:09:41.040177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:07.972762
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          June 8, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 94-1988

                            MARION FARRELL NOONE, ET AL.,
                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                            NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE, ET AL.,
                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

        No. 94-2130

                            MARION FARRELL NOONE, ET AL.,
                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                            NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE, ET AL.,
                                Defendants, Appellees.
                                 ____________________

                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                 [Hon. Walter J. Skinner, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________

                                _____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Marion Farrell Noone and Joseph F. Noone, III on brief pro se.
            ____________________     ____________________
            Donald K.  Stern, United States  Attorney, and  Susan G.  Winkler,
            ________________                                _________________
        Assistant United States  Attorney, on brief  for defendants/appellees,
        Pat  Hynes,  Paul  Desmond,  Martin  Marciniak,  Mark  Mahar,  Kenneth

        Varriale, Paul Flynn, and Thomas Lyster.
            John  V. Woodard and  Powers &  Hall Professional  Corporation, on
            ________________      ________________________________________
        brief for defendants/appellees Middleburgh Telephone  Company, Randall
        F. Becker and Barbara Becker.
            Pamela  A.  Smith  on  brief  for  defendants/appellees, New  York
            _________________
        Telephone Company, Richard A. Jalkut and Daniel J. Murphy.
            Pamela A.  Smith on  brief for  defendants/appellees, New  England
            ________________
        Telephone and Telegraph  Company, Paul O'Brien,  Robert Jacobs,  Nancy
        Kinton and William McManus.
            Philip J. Callan, Jr, Michael K.  Callan, Kevin M. Walkowski,  and
            ____________________  __________________  __________________
        Doherty,   Wallace,   Pillsbury  &   Murphy,   P.C.,   on  brief   for
        ___________________________________________________
        defendants/appellees,  James  Collins,  Harry  Miles   and  Growhoski,
        Callahan & Miles. 

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.   We have reviewed  the parties' briefs  and
                 __________

            the  record on appeal.  We deny appellants' motions to strike

            the briefs  of the federal  defendants-appellees, New England

            Telephone Company, and New York Telephone Company.

                 We  affirm essentially  for  the reasons  stated in  the

            district  court's memoranda  and orders,  dated February  23,

            1994, June 8, 1994, and October 20, 1994.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________

                                         -3-