Court Opinion

ID: 2898302
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 23:09:28.817339+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:36:54.620398
License: Public Domain

FINAL REPORT1

                            Amendment of Pa.R.Crim.P. 556

       PETITIONS SEEKING LEAVE TO RESUME INDICTING GRAND JURIES

       On September 8, 2015, effective November 1, 2015, upon the recommendation
of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee, the Court approved the amendment of
Rule of Criminal Procedure 556 (Indicting Grand Jury) to include the required contents
of the petition seeking leave to resume the use of indicting grand juries. The
requirement to petition for the resumption of indicting grand juries was established in the
Court’s Order adopting the new indicting grand jury rules.2 The contents of the petition
were established by a later Order of the Court issued on March 12, 2013.3
       The reason for this requirement was the manner in which the use of the
indictment was originally supplanted by the use of criminal informations. The 1973
amendment of Article I, § 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the subsequent
enabling legislation permitted, but did not mandate, the courts of common pleas to
proceed by information instead of by indictment, but only with the permission of the
Court. The Court then mandated that each court of common pleas petition for the
Court’s permission to proceed in the use of informations. The last court of common
pleas received the Court’s approval to proceed by information in 1991 and, effective in
1993, the Court rescinded the indicting grand jury rules as no longer necessary. The
Court’s approval of petitions to resume indicting grand juries merely reverses these
earlier actions.
       After two years of experience with the new indicting grand jury rules, the
Committee concluded that it would be helpful to provide in the indicting grand jury rules,

1
  The Committee's Final Reports should not be confused with the official Committee
Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the
Committee's Comments or the contents of the Committee's explanatory Final Reports.
2
  See 42 Pa.B. 4140 (July 7, 2012).
3
  See 43 Pa.B. 1706 (March 30, 2013).

Petitions to Resume Indicting Grand Juries in Rule 556 Final Report: 09/08/2015
rather than just the Court's order, directions on how to go about doing so to courts
seeking to resume indicting grand juries. Therefore, a new paragraph (B) has been
added to Rule 556 listing the requirements for the contents of the petition. These
requirements are taken from the Court’s March 12, 2013 Order.
       The amendment also clarifies the process for the resumption of the use of
indicting grand juries. The Court’s Orders used the phrase, “permission to summon an
indicting grand jury” that suggests that a petition might need to be filed each time a
grand jury has been summoned. Such an interpretation would be cumbersome and
contrary to the intent of the current indicting grand jury rules when originally adopted.
The existing text of the Rule 556 Comment uses the terminology of a petition “to resume
using the indicting grand jury.” The intention for the use of this terminology was that a
court of common pleas would only petition the Court once for the initial permission to
resume the use of indicting grand juries.
       Additionally, the amendment retains the terminology of the Court’s Orders that
the certification must be made by “the district attorney” rather than “the attorney for the
Commonwealth” since the procedure under this rule would encompass the practice
within judicial district as a whole rather than being applicable to an individual case.

 Petitions to Resume Indicting Grand Juries in Rule 556 Final Report: 09/08/2015 -2-