Court Opinion

ID: 544406
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:46.591737
License: Public Domain

907 F.2d 1138Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Richard Steven MAULICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Robert W. BYRD;  Sergeant E. Gordon;  C. Johnson;  G.Puckett;  R.S. Gregory;  Tammy Dameron;  Richard R.Mayfield;  Lawrence Jarvis;  Thomas R. Israel;  Carolyn G.Funn;  Leceila Turnage;  Gloria Martin;  John Doe;  WilliamP. Rogers, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 1990.Decided June 15, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.  James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-56-H)
Richard Steven Maulick, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Richard Steven Maulick appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Maulick v. Byrd, CA-89-56-H (W.D.Va. July 10, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.