Court Opinion

ID: 4691340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-29 00:00:28.058331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:54.547854
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-20866     Document: 00515880962         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/28/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                           May 28, 2021
                                  No. 19-20866                            Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Pedro Ariel Cantu-Rios,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:19-CR-461-1

   Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Ariel
   Cantu-Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cantu-Rios has not filed a response.

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-20866     Document: 00515880962         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/28/2021

                                  No. 19-20866

   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2