Court Opinion

ID: 2691407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:04:09.027928+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:18:02.881778
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Patterson, 127 Ohio St. 3d 119, 2010-Ohio-5270.]

           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PATTERSON, APPELLANT.
        [Cite as State v. Patterson, 127 Ohio St. 3d 119, 2010-Ohio-5270.]
Cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Rohrbaugh.
    (Nos. 2009-0455 and 2009-0545 — Submitted August 10, 2010 — Decided
                                    November 2, 2010.)
  APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County,
                             No. CT2008-0054, 2009-Ohio-273.
                                    __________________
        {¶ 1} The certified question is answered by our opinion in State v.
Rohrbaugh, 126 Ohio St. 3d 421, 2010-Ohio-3286, 934 N.E.2d 920, and the cause
is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Rohrbaugh,
including a determination of whether the three conditions set forth in the syllabus
of State v. Rohrbaugh were present with regard to appellant’s guilty plea to the
amended indictment.
        BROWN,       C.J.,    and    PFEIFER,    LUNDBERG           STRATTON,   O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                                    __________________
        David A. Sams, for appellant.
                                ______________________