Court Opinion

ID: 9765335
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 04:00:27.88495+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:09.025032
License: Public Domain

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.
GRAVES, Presiding Judge.
Appellant has filed a lengthy motion, approximately fifty pages, asking for a rehearing herein and he seems to be dissatisfied with our disposition of every proposition offered as set forth in the original opinion.
We have again carefully read the statement of facts and the motion for rehearing herein and have again convinced ourselves of the correctness of our holding in the original opinion.
The testimony clearly shows that appellant had debauched the complaining witness. It also shows that he had often promised her marriage. It seems the only difference between his testimony and that of the prosecutrix is as to when the promise was made. The jury, after proper instruction, found the promise to have been made at a time prior to the seduction, otherwise they would not have convicted him; the court having instructed them on this matter carefully. This involved and difficult case was tried by a learned and prudent judge and we think correctly so.
We adhere to our opinion disposing of all problems presented and the motion for rehearing will be overruled.