Court Opinion

ID: 24029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:17:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:57.580316
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-31002
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID ESTUARDO BARREDA-ALVARADO,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                      USDC No. 00-CR-70-ALL
                       --------------------
                          April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

     David Estuardo Barreda-Alvarado appeals the sentence imposed

following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that he has been sentenced to illegally lengthy terms

of imprisonment and supervised release because the felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense required to be charged

in the indictment.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 00-31002
                                -2-

     Barreda-Alvarado acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve

the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See Apprendi,

120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 2001 WL 77067 (U.S. Feb. 26, 2001)

(No. 00-8299).   Barreda-Alvarado’s argument is foreclosed.   The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.