Court Opinion

ID: 2961653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:45:48.08612+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:16.810960
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          December 8, 1992      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 92-1831                                             PABLO CARPIO-REYES,                                     Petitioner,                                          v.                                    UNITED STATES,                                     Respondent.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                  [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]                                               ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                          Torruella and Cyr, Circuit Judges.                                             ______________                                 ___________________               Pablo Carpio-Reyes on brief pro se.               __________________               Daniel  F.  Lopez-Romo,  United  States  Attorney,  Edwin O.               ______________________                              ________          Vazquez, Assistant  United States  Attorney, and Jose  A. Quiles-          _______                                          ________________          Espinosa on Motion for Summary Disposition and Memorandum of  Law          ________          in Support.                                   __________________                                 __________________                       Per Curiam.    In view of the Supreme  Court's recent                      __________          decision in United States v. Wilson, 112 S. Ct. 1351 (1992), which                      _______________________          concluded that it is the Attorney General -- and not the court --          who decides  whether time  spent  in detention  will be  credited          towards   a  sentence,   the  district   court   properly  denied          appellant's motion for credit for time spent on bond.                      Affirmed.                       ________