Court Opinion

ID: 2869526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 03:06:42.51501+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:26.597425
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-04-00423-CR

                                   Laurie Granado, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. 9034150, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               In October 2003, appellant Laurie Granado was convicted of arson, sentenced to four

years in prison, and placed on community supervision for four years. Three-and-a-half months later,

the State moved to revoke. Following a hearing, the court granted the motion and imposed sentence,

which it reduced to three years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

               In three points of error, appellant contends the court abused its discretion by revoking

her supervision because the State failed to prove that she committed a subsequent criminal offense

as alleged in the motion to revoke. Appellant does not challenge, however, the court’s findings that

she was delinquent in paying ordered fees, costs, and restitution, and that she had failed to perform

required community service.

               A finding of a single violation of the conditions of supervision is sufficient to support

revocation. Sanchez v. State, 603 S.W.2d 869, 871 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Thus, in order to
prevail, an appellant must successfully challenge all the findings that support the revocation order.

Jones v. State, 571 S.W.2d 191, 193-94 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Joseph v. State, 3 S.W.3d 627, 640

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.). Because the district court’s unchallenged findings

are sufficient to support its order, we need not address appellant’s points of error.

               The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

                                               __________________________________________

                                               Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: August 24, 2005

Do Not Publish

                                                  2