Court Opinion

ID: 9927689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-29 20:00:59.341338+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:42.720322
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-10270    Document: 32-1     Date Filed: 01/29/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-10270
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10270      Document: 32-1       Date Filed: 01/29/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                       Opinion of the Court                  23-10270

       Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen
       Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw
       from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
       pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
       independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment
       of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
       examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
       counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s
       conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 1

       1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma

       pauperis are DENIED.