Court Opinion

ID: 9895135
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-04 21:00:32.746533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:27.003727
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6195      Doc: 10         Filed: 11/03/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6195

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        KENNETH LEE BROWN,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00027-HMH-1)

        Submitted: October 31, 2023                                  Decided: November 3, 2023

        Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kenneth Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Justin William Holloway, Assistant United States
        Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
        for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6195      Doc: 10        Filed: 11/03/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Kenneth Lee Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting his motion for

        compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1) and reducing his sentence to an

        aggregate 446 months’ imprisonment and denying his motions for reconsideration. We

        have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

        court’s orders. United States v. Brown, No. 7:04-cr-00027-HMH-1 (D.S.C. July 12, 2021;

        Dec. 20, 2021; Dec. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2