Court Opinion

ID: 989410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:06:36.863778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:12.303034
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7889

LEVERN HENRY,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.     Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-2908)

Submitted:   May 16, 1996                  Decided:   May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levern Henry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant Appellant's motions to supplement the record and
his motion to amend his informal brief, we deny his motion for a

detailed inventory of the pleadings in the record on appeal and

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henry v. South Caro-
lina, No. CA-95-2908 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2