Court Opinion

ID: 1000581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:42:44.398265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:16.086446
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 99-2082

PAUL M. BLOWE,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

COMMONWEALTH   OF    VIRGINIA,   Department   of
Transportation,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-99-1139-2)

Submitted:   December 7, 1999              Decided:   January 4, 2000

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul M. Blowe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Paul M. Blowe appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in his civil action, which the district court construed as

filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999).   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.     See Blowe v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-99-1139-2

(E.D. Va. July 20, 1999).    We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2