Court Opinion

ID: 9372209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-19 08:12:05.993939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:33.647338
License: Public Domain

Motion for Rehearing and En Banc Reconsideration of Denial of Motion to
Stay Dismissed as Moot; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed
February 14, 2023

                                      In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-22-00726-CV

                      MONIQUE MANDELL, Appellant
                                        V.

  FATIMA BRELAND AND AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST,
                       Appellees

                     On Appeal from Probate Court No. 3
                            Harris County, Texas
                        Trial Court Cause No. 504405

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      This appeal is from an order signed October 10, 2022. No clerk’s record has
been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed
the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

      On October 25, 2022, notification was transmitted to all parties of the
court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within
fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and
provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No
response to the notice was filed. On November 17, 2022, appellant was ordered to
provide this court with proof of payment for the record on or before November 28,
2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). In the order, the court notified appellant that
failure to comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal of the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). A response, but no proof of payment or payment
arrangements was filed December 5, 2022.

      On December 22, 2022, notification was again transmitted to all parties of
the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within
fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and
provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). On
January 3 and 17, 2023, the county clerk notified this court, and copied appellant’s
counsel, of the outstanding balance for the clerk’s record. As of this date, appellant
has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. We dismiss the
appeal.

                                       PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

                                          2