Court Opinion

ID: 2861078
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 21:19:55.534652+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:12.681347
License: Public Domain

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">8</A>-00<A NAME="2">556</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>

<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Patricia Jensen</A>, Appellant</CENTER>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="4">Conference of Olympus (Gymnosophical), Inc.</A>, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">BASTROP</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">335TH</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">22,035</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">HAROLD R. TOWSLEE</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING </STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>

<STRONG>PER CURIAM</STRONG>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Upon reviewing the clerk's record and other documents filed in this case, this Court
found no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order; appellant seems to appeal from the
denial of a motion to dismiss.  Because this Court has no jurisdiction over cases in that posture,
this Court's clerk sent a letter asking the parties to explain why this appeal should not be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction.  The letter cautioned that the Court might have to dismiss the appeal.  </P>

<P>	We have reviewed the appellant's response to the clerk's query.  We find no basis
on which this Court can exercise jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal.  We therefore dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Powers and Kidd</P>

<P>Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction</P>

<P>Filed:  December 29, 1998</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>