Court Opinion

ID: 1019630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:38:37.709091+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:51.049440
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6030

MELVIN ALEXANDER BRITT,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MRS. HENRY, Mail Room Clerk; SERGEANT HAMBLIN,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-475-JLK-MFU)

Submitted:   May 26, 2006                  Decided:   June 15, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Alexander Britt, Appellant Pro Se.       William W. Muse,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Melvin   A.   Britt   appeals   the   district    court’s   order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.          We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.          Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.          See Britt v.

Henry, No. CA-05-475-JLK-MFU (W.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2005). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                 - 2 -