Court Opinion

ID: 1002325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:09:30.620193+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:09.473580
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 00-6562

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION HEALTH DEPARTMENT,
Maryland Correctional Institution, Western
Correctional Institution, Roxbury Correctional
Institution; THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-3222-WMN)

Submitted:   August 24, 2000                 Decided:   August 30, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Guy Lancaster Richmond appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court.   See Richmond v. Correctional Institution

Health Dep’t, No. CA-99-3222-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 13, 2000).   We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2