Court Opinion

ID: 9831894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:27:15.924517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:38.860354
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, urging the same questions as upon original submission. He has also in said motion stated that the court was in error when it said: “Appellant insisted that he should have his ■half of the usual commission of 5% of the sales price but signed the release,” insisting that there is nowhere in the record any testimony supporting this expression. On page 3 of the statement of facts appellant testified among other things, the following: “I was a party to the release of that money to Mr. Crosby ⅜ ⅜ ⅜. ” We think this directly supports our statement.
We have considered all matters presented by appellant in his motion for rehearing and the same is in all things overruled.