Court Opinion

ID: 4930791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 01:07:18.499684+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:28.168315
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by
Tenney, C. J.
Attachments of property in the hands of trustees of the principal debtor are wholly regulated by statute in this State) and the statutes contain no provision that a guardian can be summoned and holden as a trustee, on account of goods, effects or credits belonging to the principal defendant, in a suit against the latter. The guardian cannot be sued for the debt of the ward, though assets may be in his hands. Raymond v. Sawyer, 37 Maine, 406.
In the case now before the Court, the ward was supposed to be indebted to the principal defendant at the time the original action was brought, and, at-the term of the Court, at which that action was entered, he disclosed assets in his hands, and he was adjudged trustee. He failed to make payment or deliver any goods of the principal debtor, when called upon for the purpose, by the officer, who had the execution in force against the principal debtor, and the goods, effects and credits of him, in the hands of the defendant, the supposed trustee, and this process is instituted on account of this omission.
By the authority of R. S., c. 86, § 71, the defendant was allowed by the Court to disclose further, in this action against him. He has made his disclosure and was again adjudged trustee, to which adjudication he takes exceptions.
*83From the view, which wo have expressed in the foregoing, touching the liability of a guardian to the trustee process, we are of the opinion, that the defendant was not liable; and, although a judgment against him, as trustee, was entered in the original suit, he now has relief by the provision of § 72, of the same chapter, that if he had been examined in the original suit, the Court may permit or require him to be examined anew, in the suit of scire facias; and he may then prove any matter proper for his defence; and the Court may enter such judgment as law and justice require, upon the whole matter appearing, on such examination and trial. He has been guilty of neglect, in not taking exceptions to the adjudication on the first disclosure.
It is adjudged, that the supposed trustee is not chargeable; but that the plaintiff recover costs of scire facias against him.
Appleton, Cutting, May, Goodenow, and Davis, JJ., concurred.