Court Opinion

ID: 2900720
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 16:31:25.836872+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:10.908079
License: Public Domain

Criminal Case Template

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

ADAM QUANAH LAY,

                            Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                            Appellee.
§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-02-00045-CR

Appeal from the

296th District Court

of Collin County, Texas

(TC# 296-80455-98)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court to the
offense of aggravated robbery.  He was convicted, and the court assessed punishment at ten
(10) years' deferred adjudication probation.  On October 19, 2000, the State filed a motion
to enter a final adjudication of guilt.  Following a hearing and upon Appellant's plea of true,
the court adjudicated Appellant's guilt and sentenced him to thirty-five (35) years'
imprisonment.  We affirm.
	Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that
the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87
S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might
arguably support the appeal.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978);
Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553
(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy
of counsel's brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal
is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might
arguably support the appeal.  A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief
would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
	The judgment is affirmed.
July 8, 2003
						_______________________________________
						RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

Before Panel No. 2
Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)