Court Opinion

ID: 8670590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:59:01.792273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:19.263986
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
James Gilbert Woodson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom*157mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodson v. Huppenthal, No. 5:07-cv-00141, 2008 WL 828829 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.