Court Opinion

ID: 9959742
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-12 16:00:33.581783+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:53.830524
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 23-3153
                     ___________________________

                               Jarell Davis Terry

                     lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

Kenyon Randle, Major, EARU Max; Michael Richardson, Deputy Warden, EARU
                      Max; Gaylon Lay, Warden, EARU

                   lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                    ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta
                                ____________

                           Submitted: April 4, 2024
                            Filed: April 12, 2024
                                [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Arkansas inmate Jarell Terry appeals following the district court’s1 adverse
grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that
defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by depriving him of outdoor
exercise. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal,
we find no basis for reversal. See Danker v. City of Council Bluffs, 53 F.4th 420,
423 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment); Monarch Fire
Prot. Dist. of St. Louis Cnty. v. Freedom Consulting & Auditing Servs., Inc., 644 F.3d
633, 639 (8th Cir. 2011) (abuse of discretion review of denial of motion for
sanctions). As we affirm the adverse grant of summary judgment on the merits, we
conclude Terry’s challenge to the court’s denial of a preliminary injunction is moot,
see Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441, 1450 (9th Cir. 1992); and
we lack jurisdiction to consider Terry’s challenge to the order denying his post-
judgment motion for reconsideration, as he did not file a new or amended notice of
appeal after that order was issued, see Miles v. Gen. Motors Corp., 262 F.3d 720,
722-23 (8th Cir. 2001).

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________

      1
       The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

                                         -2-