Court Opinion

ID: 4155064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-23 17:09:41.241083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:38.349215
License: Public Domain

People v Rojas (2017 NY Slip Op 02163)

People v Rojas

2017 NY Slip Op 02163

Decided on March 23, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 23, 2017

Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische, JJ.

5311/10 3507A 4742/14 3507

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vJoseph Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Brittany N. Francis of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered May 7, 2015,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 23, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.