Court Opinion

ID: 8624516
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:34:27.116255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:36.416027
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 4, 2007, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint because its “factual contentions are clearly baseless” and the action is irivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *323See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.