Court Opinion

ID: 681870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:39:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:29.133756
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1176
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Alvin FAULKNER, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Theodore PURNELL, Security Chief;  Charvette Henson;Coleman Reichlyn, Captain;  Karen C. Wouldbridge;D. McGawn, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6839.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Sept. 26, 1994.Decided:  Oct. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CA-93-3984-JFM)
Alvin Faulkner, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Faulkner v. Purnell, No. CA-93-3984-JFM (D. Md. July 22, 1994).  We deny Faulkner's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED