Court Opinion

ID: 9829465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:19:51.078989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:01.355032
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
[4] In his motion for rehearing plaintiff in error contends that the error complained of under the several assignments of error, affecting the court’s charge, and which we refused to consider, is fundamental in its nature, and apparent upon the record, and should therefore be considered without bills of exception or assignments of error. The statute of 1913 relating to the manner of preserving exceptions to the court’s charge for review in this court is mandatory. Under that act, errors in the charge, whether fundamental or otherwise (unless they are jurisdictional in their nature or for some other reason render the judgment void), are waived and approved, unless excepted to in the manner prescribed. Needham v. Cooney, 173 S. W. 985; McKenzie v. Imperial Irr. Co., 166 S. W. 495.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.