Court Opinion

ID: 9693312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 16:36:27.286777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:44.636685
License: Public Domain

Caporale, J.,
dissenting.
I join in Judge White’s dissent, and add the observation that, generally, where a statute has been judicially construed and that construction has not evoked an amendment, it will be presumed that the Legislature has acquiesced in the court’s determination of its intent. Erspamer Advertising Co. v. Dept. of Labor, ante p. 68, 333 N.W.2d 646 (1983). See, also, State v. Hocutt, 207 Neb. 689, 300 N.W.2d 198 (1981).