Court Opinion

ID: 4261775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-05 20:00:36.245182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:29:52.745545
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-14632   Date Filed: 04/05/2018   Page: 1 of 2

                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 17-14632
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00082-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

MARK BURNS,
                                                            Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                 (April 5, 2018)

Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Richard Summa, appointed counsel for Mark Burns in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
              Case: 17-14632    Date Filed: 04/05/2018   Page: 2 of 2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Burns’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2