Court Opinion

ID: 212438
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-03-16 00:01:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:28:11.189496
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM
  
   **
  

  Eugenia Derden appeals pro se from the district court’s June 16, 2008 order which denied Derden’s “motion for a stay,” and directed Derden to comply with the court’s April 4, 2008 order. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Der-den’s motion for a stay where in its April 4, 2008 order the district court: noted that Derden failed to comply with its prior order to file an amended complaint identifying the basis for federal jurisdiction; noted that the case was dismissed without prejudice to her filing a new complaint in a separate action; and ordered that Derden not file any further documents in the case.
 

  Derden’s request for appointment of counsel is denied.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   **
  

   This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.