Court Opinion

ID: 4030573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-01 14:25:37.556725+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:20.974612
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-16-00334-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

            IN THE INTEREST OF K. A. H. JR., A CHILD
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 94th District Court
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
              Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                      Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Cheri Davis, appealed a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of

Nueces County, Texas. On June 30, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that

the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d). The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of

appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. On

August 8, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and

warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not cured within
ten days. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or corrected the

defect.

       On July 28, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was delinquent

in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

correct the defect or pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of

prosecution.

                                                                       PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
1st day of September, 2016.

                                               2