Court Opinion

ID: 2014433
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:03:12.247813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:55.304657
License: Public Domain

14 Mich. App. 235 (1968)
165 N.W.2d 269
PEOPLE
v.
CURLEY
PEOPLE
v.
SHAW
Docket No. 3,553.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided November 25, 1968.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Angelo A. Pentolino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Marshall C. Hill, for defendants.
*236 PER CURIAM:
Defendants were jointly tried and convicted of first-degree murder[*] by a jury. We find reversible error occurred during the course of the trial as to each of the defendants for the following reasons.
Defendant Shaw was seriously prejudiced by the introduction of evidence of similar robberies committed by him. See People v. Askar (1967), 8 Mich. App. 95.
Defendant Curley's conviction violated the constitutional mandate of Bruton v. United States (1968), 391 U.S. 123 (88 S. Ct. 1620, 20 L. Ed. 2d 476), made retroactive and effective upon the States in Roberts v. Russell (1968), 392 U.S. 293 (88 S. Ct. 1921, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1100). Unlike the situation in People v. Shirk (1968), 10 Mich. App. 121, defense counsel made spontaneous objections to the use of such statement.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and KELLEY, JJ., concurred.
NOTES
[*]  CL 1948, § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548).