Court Opinion

ID: 9697846
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:34:02.228455+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:35.968967
License: Public Domain

Beilfuss, J.
(dissenting). I agree with the opinion of the majority that the findings of fact are not sufficient to support the conclusion of law and judgment and, therefore, agree the judgment should be reversed.
From a review of the record and the emphasis of counsel in this appeal it appears the basic complaint was the claimed abnormal sexual conduct on the part of the husband. I also agree that sexual conduct participated *515in by the complainant for several years without objection cannot constitute cruel and inhuman treatment. Because this element probably played a dominant role in the proof offered by the parties and in the formulation of the findings of fact by the trial court, I would reverse the judgment and order a new trial in the interests of justice under the authority of sec. 251.09, Stats.
I am authorized to state that Mr. Justice Heffernan and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen join in this dissent.