Court Opinion

ID: 8310952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 13:48:15.226622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:43.362157
License: Public Domain

Billings, J.
To the plaintiffs’ claim defendant interposes the exception that the plaintiffs, chartered or existing under the laws of the state *22of Kentucky, Rave failed to comply with the provisions of article 236 of the constitution of the state of Louisiana, which provides that no foreign corporation shall do any business in this state without having one or more known places of business, and an authorized agent or agents in the state upon whom process may be served. Held, that the provision of the constitution of Louisiana referred -to, being an attempt on the part of the state to interpose a restriction on navigation, and therefore in conflict with the provisions of the act of congress approved February 18, 1793, passed in pursuance of a clear authority under the constitution of the United States, is null and void. Sinnot v. Davenport, 22 How. 227.
Exception overruled, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs in each cause.