Court Opinion

ID: 9692242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 15:48:23.666143+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:33.490700
License: Public Domain

Souris, J.
(concurring in reversal and remand). The referee and appeal board found as a fact that claimants refused to cross the picket line because of violence or the threat of violence. That factual finding was not against the great weight of the evidence. CLS 1956, § 421.38 (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 17.540). Having so found, the referee and appeal board correctly concluded that neither of the asserted disqualifying provisions of the act was legally applicable. I concur in reversal and remand.
Carr, C. J., and Dethmers, Kelly, Kavanagh, and Otis M. Smith, JJ., concurred with Souris, J.
O’Hara, J., took no part in the decision of this case.