Court Opinion

ID: 8464242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:20:04.116335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.088697
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Harpreet Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we grant the petition for review.
The BIA abused its discretion in denying Kaur’s motion to reopen where she provided sufficient evidence that circumstances have changed in India such that she now has a “reasonable likelihood” of demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution. See Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 947-48 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that circumstances had changed where petitioner submitted new evidence of violence against Egytian Coptic Christians generally and specific acts of violence against his family in particular). Moreover, because Kaur established changed circumstances, the BIA abused its discretion in finding the motion timebarred. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); Malty, 381 F.3d at 945-46.
Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand to the BIA with instructions to reopen. See id. at 948.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.