Court Opinion

ID: 9641303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 17:28:05.791048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:36.485595
License: Public Domain

MORRISON, Judge
(dissenting).
I do not believe that the issue of constitutionality is properly before this Court.1 The complaint and information upon which appellant stands convicted are fatally defective, because the acts relied upon to constitute negligence are not alleged as required by Art. 21.IS, V.A.C.C.P. The complaint charged that appellant
“and in wilful and wanton disregard for the safety of persons and property, to-wit, drive and operate a motor vehicle on a public street and highway.”
In a similar situation in Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 388 S.W.2d 716, where appellant had pled guilty to aggravated assault with a motor vehicle and the complaint charged as follows:
“did then and there drive a motor vehicle, to-wit: a truck tractor upon a public highway, to-wit State Highway 7 and State Highway 103, and did then and there commit an aggravated assault in and upon the person of George Chro-mack by then and there willfully and with negligence colliding with and causing injury to the person of George Chro-mack,”
such conviction was reversed because of the failure of the complaint and information to allege the act or acts relied upon to constitute negligence as required by the then Art. 408a, V.A.C.C.P. See also Short v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 387 S.W.2d 50; Scott v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 53, 344 S.W.2d 457; and White v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 346, 299 S.W.2d 292.
I dissent to the affirmance of this conviction.
ONION, P. J., joins in this dissent.

. Taylor v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.lt. 461, 358 S.W.24 124.