Court Opinion

ID: 1007917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:32:24.612259+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:36.307033
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Ford,
  
  No. CR-94-163-18-2 (E.D.Va., filed Apr. 10, 2002; entered Apr. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.