Court Opinion

ID: 4223798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-28 01:00:25.232157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:51.814274
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10062      Document: 00514249605         Page: 1    Date Filed: 11/27/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 17-10062                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        November 27, 2017
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS SIDON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:16-CR-122-6

Before WIENER, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Sidon has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Sidon has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us
to make a fair evaluation of Sidon’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel;

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10062      Document: 00514249605   Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/27/2017

                                 No. 17-10062

we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral
review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Sidon’s response.     We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2