Court Opinion

ID: 9939302
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:09:36.382184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:49.314638
License: Public Domain

On Return to Remand
On February 11, 2000, we remanded this case for the trial court to clarify whether it intended to use the term "monthly" instead *Page 119 
of "quarterly" in it's order directing the father, Paul Otis Pittman, to pay his pro rata share of expenses.
The trial court's return indicates that the court intended to use the term "monthly." With the word "monthly" substituted for the word "quarterly," the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Robertson, P.J., and Yates, Crawley, and Thompson, JJ., concur.