Court Opinion

ID: 8462880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:39:02.748946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.810021
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Ren Jun Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s motion because he did not satisfy any of the requirements set forth in Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), and the alleged ineffective assistance was not “obvious and undisputed *529on the face of the record.” Reyes v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 592, 597 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.