Court Opinion

ID: 1000875
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:47:16.765243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:57.156904
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7124

LEE ODIS ALFORD,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MACK JARVIS; PATRICIA L. CHAVIS,

                                           Defendants - Appellees,

          and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,

                                                           Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-663-5-H)

Submitted:   February 10, 2000         Decided:     February 15, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Odis Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Lee Odis Alford appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Alford v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correc-

tion, No. CA-98-663-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2