Court Opinion

ID: 7667088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 00:47:16.808431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:08.483463
License: Public Domain

John M’Clean brought an action of debt in the District Court of Petersburg, against Richard Taylor & Co. on a bond for the payment of sterling money. The plea, was payment, and the jury found a general verdict for the plaintiff; on which, judgment was rendered for the debt in the declaration mentioned. To this judgment a supersedeas was awarded, and the errors assigned were, 1. That no damages were laid in the declaration, or found *by the verdict. 2. That the Court had made no rule fixing the sum in current money, with which the judgment for sterling money might be discharged. The first error assigned was abandoned.
On the second, it was contended for the defendant in error, that the rule, stating the sum in current money by which a judgment in sterling should be discharged, formed no part of the judgment itself. It was usually entered at the close of a term, and was applied, to each particular judgment, by the Clerk. The judgment, therefore, was not erroneous, and ought not to be reversed. An instruction to the Sheriff how to serve the execution, was alone necessary ; and, that might be obtained at the succeeding term, before the Clerk could issue the execution, should the judgment be affirmed.
But the Court reversed the judgment, for this defect.