Court Opinion

ID: 732138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 16:38:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:00.454073
License: Public Domain

103 F.3d 142
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos Palomino GUERRERO, a/k/a Nicholas Palomino,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50177.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 2, 1996.*Decided Dec. 06, 1996.

Before:  SNEED, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Carlos Palomino Guerrero appeals his jury conviction and the sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.  His counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified no issues for appellate review, and Guerrero has not filed a supplemental pro se brief raising any issues.

3
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3