Court Opinion

ID: 8438744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:57:06.578493+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.551159
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Lee McCarty appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCarty v. Smith, No. 5:09-ct-03126-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2010). We deny McCarty’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.