Court Opinion

ID: 5046968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 07:26:57.564884+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:49.666710
License: Public Domain

DOUGLAS, Judge,
dissenting.
The indictment should be held sufficient for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Ex parte Cannon, 546 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App., 1976); Reynolds v. State, 547 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.Cr.App., 1976); Herrin v. State, 547 S.W.2d 598 (Tex.Cr.App., this day decided). See also the concurring opinion in Jones v. State, 545 S.W.2d 771 (Tex.Cr.App., 1975, motion for rehearing, January 26, 1977).