Court Opinion

ID: 8451392
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:31:33.504969+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.913743
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.