Court Opinion

ID: 9811721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 22:27:46.215055+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:21:15.826876
License: Public Domain

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice,
dissenting.
This is a slip and fall case.
Based upon Wal-Mart Stores v. Gonzalez, 968 S.W.2d 934, 937-938 (Tex.1998), I would hold that the meager statements describing the liquid in which Alice Kofahl allegedly slipped are no evidence to support constructive notice of its presence on the floor.
Lloyd Kofahl filed a joint notice of appeal with his wife, Alice. The judgment as to Lloyd, however, was not attacked in any *683manner on appeal, and, therefore, the appeal as to that portion of the judgment should be affirmed.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. Because the Court reverses the judgment in part, I respectfully dissent.