Court Opinion

ID: 9893578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-27 19:03:28.044342+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:35.941625
License: Public Domain

Filed 10/27/23 P. v. Tajgardoun CA3
                                           NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                        (Lassen)
                                                            ----

THE PEOPLE,                                                                                  C097687

                   Plaintiff and Respondent,                                         (Super. Ct. No. 2020-
                                                                                         CR0019299)
         v.

LIDA TAJGARDOUN,

                   Defendant and Appellant.

         Appointed counsel for defendant Lida Tajgardoun filed an opening brief that sets
forth the facts of this case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether
there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.)
Finding no arguable errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to
Tajgardoun, we will affirm the judgment.
                                                  BACKGROUND
         In August 2022, Tajgardoun pled no contest to conspiring with others to bring
drugs into a state prison. The parties stipulated the information provided a factual basis

                                                             1
for the plea. In exchange for her plea, the People agreed to a “lid” or maximum of the
middle term of three years and to dismiss the remaining charge.
       The trial court subsequently denied Tajgardoun’s request for probation and
sentenced her to the low term of two years. Tajgardoun would serve her term in “county
prison.” Tajgardoun timely appealed without a certificate of probable cause.
                                       DISCUSSION
       Appointed counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and
asking this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable
issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Tajgardoun was advised by
counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the
opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we received no communication from
Tajgardoun.
       Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error
that would result in a disposition more favorable to Tajgardoun.
                                       DISPOSITION
       The judgment is affirmed.

                                                      /s/
                                                  BOULWARE EURIE, J.

We concur:

    /s/
EARL, P. J.

    /s/
ROBIE, J.

                                              2