Court Opinion

ID: 5283935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 01:26:38.109705+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:29.925029
License: Public Domain

CAPERTON, Judge,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent. I would find that denial of the tower’s advertised location, *921including the three proposed alternate locations, followed by the approval of an unadvertised location violated due process. A landowner reviewing the proposed locations of a tower may not have any objection to an advertised location and, thus, may not appear at the hearing or offer objection. However, the same landowner may well have objections to tower placement or construction in an unadvertised location. Failure to give notice is a violation of due process. I would reverse on this issue and remand for further hearing.