Court Opinion

ID: 6519465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:29:45.361277+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:06.670766
License: Public Domain

DOWDELL, J.
The defendant offered no evidence. The evidence introduced by [the State was without conflict, and showed that the defendant in October, 1901, and before the finding of the indictment, in Montgomery county bet money at a game played with cards. That itlie game was played in a room in the upper .story of O’Rear’s store in the county and city of Montgomery. That the room used, and the one in which said game was played, was in a two story building, the room being in the second story of said building. That in the room was a bed with mattress on it, a table and chairs. That in the first or ground floor of said building there was a storehouse for retailing spirituous, vinous and malt liquors, which was occupied by said O’Rear as a store, and liquors were kept by said O’Rear in said store for sale. That to reach said room where said game Was played there was a stairway that led from the sidewalk in front of said store to the second story of said ■building. That there was a wooden partition that separated the stairway from the store occupied by O’Rear, that extended from the stairs to the ceiling. That there was no opening between said stairway and the said store. That during the firne the game was played, which continued the greater part of the day, the defendant, *195with several others, came into and went out of said room by the stairway that entered said building from ithe street. That there was no opening connecting the room where the game was played and the store room underneath occupied by O’Bear, but it was all the same building and known as O’Bear’s. On this undisputed evidence and under the decisions by this court in the following cases: Johnson v. State, 19 Ala. 527; Brown v. State, 27 Ala. 47; Huffman v. State, 29 Ala. 40; s. c. 30 Ala. 532, the court properly gave the general affirmative 'Charge as requested in writing by the State, and committed no reversible error in refusing the charges requested by the defendant. There were no other exceptions reserved.
There is no error in 'the record, and the judgment will be affirmed.