Court Opinion

ID: 9965791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-05-03 15:01:32.311716+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:45.747819
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-3562
                        ___________________________

                                  Valerie Steiner

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

                      M & H Appliances Sales and Service

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                         for the District of Minnesota
                                 ____________

                            Submitted: April 30, 2024
                              Filed: May 3, 2024
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Valerie Steiner, a former employee of M & H Appliances Sales and Service,
appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se

      1
      The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on
appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v.
Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 770 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant
of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________

                                        -2-