Court Opinion

ID: 1496052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:29:01.4484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:10:31.054176
License: Public Domain

282 S.W.3d 885 (2009)
Dale WARLOCK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91645.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 12, 2009.
Alexander Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Christopher Koster, John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
*886 Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dale Warlock appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).