Court Opinion

ID: 9416528
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 19:48:43.231853+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:29.188806
License: Public Domain

*488Mr. Justice DANIEL
dissents from the decision of th'is court
in this car1 t, upon the ground that the said railroad company being a corporation, created by the State of Pennsylvania, is not capable of pleading or being impleaded, under the 2d section of the 3d article of the constitution, in any of the courts of the United States; and that therefore the Circuit Court could not take cognizance of the controversy between that corporation and the plaintiff in that court.

Order.

This cause came on to be heard, on the transcript of the record, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, and adjudged, by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court, in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs and interest until the same is paid at the same rate per annum that similar judgments bear in the’ courts of the State of Pennsylvania.