Court Opinion

ID: 4147562
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-22 20:12:24.188986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:59.371517
License: Public Domain

People v Bonneau (2017 NY Slip Op 01378)

People v Bonneau

2017 NY Slip Op 01378

Decided on February 22, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 22, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2015-03548
 (Ind. No. 14-00236)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v Jude Bonneau, appellant.

James D. Licata, New City, NY (Ellen O'Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, NY (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered March 18, 2015, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea was involuntary because of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record (see People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d 1108, 1109; see also People v Evans, 16 NY3d 571, 575 n 2). In this case, it is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was coerced or deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Granger, 122 AD3d 940, 942; cf. People v Crump, 53 NY2d 824; People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852). Since the defendant's claims of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety (see People v Freeman, 93 AD3d 805; People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d 1109; People v Rohlehr, 87 AD3d 603, 604).
BALKIN, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court