Court Opinion

ID: 6025896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:20:04.386357+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:01.407194
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), rendered November 6, 1996, convicting him of rob*859bery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.