Court Opinion

ID: 9777366
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 20:08:25.762384+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:53.072348
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
CLINTON, Judge.
On original submission a Court panel set aside the judgment of conviction in our Cause No. 60,820 because the record did not contain a written waiver of indictment personally executed by appellant nor any other indicia that he has waived his basic right to be charged with a felony offense by presentment of indictment from a grand jury. That omission, which appellant concedes was “due primarily to clerical error,” has now been supplied by a supplemental transcript showing a properly executed waiver, so we grant the State’s motion for rehearing.
These consolidated causes present common grounds of error which, we find, were correctly decided on original submission in Cause No. 60,819. Appellant’s motions for rehearing are, accordingly, overruled.
*42Having granted the State’s motion for rehearing, we now affirm the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 60,820.