Court Opinion

ID: 4126164
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-15 16:12:51.195401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:56.160936
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                AAT BIOQUEST, INC.,
                  Plaintiff-Appellee

                           v.

 TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC.,
            Defendant-Appellant
           ______________________

                      2016-2056
                ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR,
Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.
                 ______________________

              Decided: February 15, 2017
               ______________________

    KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also
represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN.

   RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-
appellant.
              ______________________

  Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit
                        Judges.
2                AAT BIOQUEST, INC.   v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE

PER CURIAM.
    On this limited record and in light of the arguments
raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.
                     AFFIRMED