Court Opinion

ID: 4181766
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-28 19:17:46.199291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:16.985327
License: Public Domain

People v Davis (2017 NY Slip Op 05237)

People v Davis

2017 NY Slip Op 05237

Decided on June 28, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 28, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-08213
 (Ind. No. 6234/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJohn Davis, appellant.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Marie John-Drigo of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed August 6, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed was excessive.
ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137; People v Johnson, 109 AD3d 1004), and, thus, the waiver does not preclude review of this excessive sentence claim. However, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the amended sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., HALL, COHEN, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court