Court Opinion

ID: 6934814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 00:25:45.429332+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:24.058077
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
This case was remanded to us from the Oregon Supreme Court, for reconsideration in light of State v. Owens, 302 Or 196, 729 P2d 524 (1986). In our first opinion, 77 Or App 306, 307, 713 P2d 45 (1986), we held that the warrantless testing of the contents of a paperfold seized from defendant’s jacket was unlawful under Article 1, § 9 of the Oregon Constitution. That holding is wrong under Owens.
Affirmed.