Court Opinion

ID: 9527303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:29:24.486458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:42.209366
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing
SIMPSON, Justice.
Appellee again makes reference to thirty-one direct notes executed by Bryant to Selman claimed to have been altered after execution so as to provide interest and contends that we made no holding with respect to whether or not interest was recoverable. These notes, liability thereunder and the applicability of Title 39, § 120, Code 1940, was not before the court, as was pointed out on original deliverance — no exceptions to-the register’s report having been taken in that regard.
For future guidance of the register in stating the account, we will also respond to-the second contention urged by appellee on rehearing that the collateral notes taken over by the appellant should bear interest until termination date of the relationship of the parties September 17, 1948. That statement is a correct hypothesis upon which to-rest a finding and the original opinion-should not be misconstrued to the contrary..
Rehearing denied.