Court Opinion

ID: 994649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:25:59.55082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:57.720416
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6178

JAMES H. LESTER,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

TRUDY TEEL, PSY.D/TT,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-97-840-R)

Submitted:   March 26, 1998                 Decided:   April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Lester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Lester v. Teel, No. CA-97-840-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 28, 1998). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2