Court Opinion

ID: 6599077
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:06:07.401299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:57:57.253325
License: Public Domain

By the Court,
DixoN, C. J.
This case is like Seamans vs. Carter & Putnam, decided in October, 1862. Tbe material *591facts are the same. The defendants Albee and others, in April, 1855, recovered a judgment against one Hall, the then owner of a homestead in the county of Winnebago. The judgment was docketed so as to become a lien within the doctrine of Hoyt v. Howe, 3 Wis., 765. Hall continued to occupy until October, 1861, when he conveyed to the plaintiff Elizabeth Dopp, who, with her husband, the other plaintiff, has since held possession. After the conveyance, the defendants took out execution on their judgment, sold, and themselves became the purchasers of the premises. This suit is brought to restrain further proceedings upon the certificates of sale, and to have them set aside as a cloud upon the title of the plaintiffs, and the judgment decreed not to be a lien. The plaintiffs rely on the act of May 17th, 1858. R. S., p. 798. This statute was held prospective and not retrospective in its operation, in the case referred to, and this appeal must abide the result of that decision.
The order of the circuit court is accordingly affirmed.