Court Opinion

ID: 3818167
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:54:01.881345+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:28.049684
License: Public Domain

This cause comes on for hearing upon a motion to dismiss, upon the ground, among many others, that "sufficient notice to settle and sign the case-made was not given the defendants in error, as required by the order of the court."
It seems that by order of the trial court said plaintiff in error was required to give five days' notice of the time and place of signing and settling the case-made; that the notice of settling and signing was served on the attorneys for the defendants in error on the 22d day of September, 1915, and the case-made was settled on September 25, 1915, a period of only three days.
In the case of Swanson v. Bayless, 51 Okla. 37, 151 P. 683, the trial court's order extending time to make and serve case-made required the defendant to give four days' notice, but only two days' notice was given. The court held:
"Where the order extending time to make and serve case-made allows case to be settled upon four days' notice, and the case is settled upon two days' notice, without an agreement or waiver of time by adverse party appearing and suggesting amendments, it is insufficient, and authorizes a dismissal of the appeal."
For the reason stated, the motion to dismiss must be sustained.
All the Justices concur. *Page 569