Court Opinion

ID: 2781731
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-02-24 22:00:57.769092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:25.022448
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FILED
                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                         FEB 24 2015

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10641

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00478-JGZ

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
NABOR CAMPILLO-VEGA, a.k.a.
Eduardo Campillo-Vega, a.k.a. Juan
Manuel Vega-Zuniga,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                    Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted February 17, 2015**

Before:        O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

       Nabor Campillo-Vega appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Campillo-Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Campillo-Vega the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

         AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                   13-10641