Court Opinion

ID: 899853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-12 13:11:52.584899+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:23.196032
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-41037          Document: 00512270449         Page: 1   Date Filed: 06/11/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                            June 11, 2013

                                             No. 12-41037                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

In the Matter of: ASARCO, L.L.C.,

                                                     Debtor

--------------------------------------------------
MERITAIN HEALTH, INC.,

                                                     Appellant

v.

ASARCO, L.L.C.,

                                                     Appellee

--------------------------------------------------
        Consolidated With
        Case No. 12-41047

In the Matter of: ASARCO, L.L.C.; ET AL,

                                                     Debtor

--------------------------------------------------
ASARCO, L.L.C.; ET AL, Debtor in Possession,

                                                     Appellee

v.

SCRIP WORLD, L.L.C.,

                                                     Appellant
     Case: 12-41037       Document: 00512270449         Page: 2     Date Filed: 06/11/2013

                                       No. 12-41037

                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC Nos. 2:11-CV-225 & 2:11-CV-228

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

                                              2