Court Opinion

ID: 8025722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:35:47.520094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:48.874342
License: Public Domain

DECISION
The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 15 years, imposed on February 9, 1968, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:
(1) No change will be made in the sentence heretofore imposed.
The reason for the above decision: A careful consideration of the evidence offered is not deemed sufficient to justify any change in the sentence heretofore imposed and, therefore, the Petition is denied.
SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION
Jack D. Shanstrom, acting chairman; Philip C. Duncan, Paul G. Hatfield.