Court Opinion

ID: 7745778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:10:04.881302+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:35.742807
License: Public Domain

ORFINGER, R.B.,
concurring and concurring specially.
I concur with the court’s opinion because we are bound by Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla.1990) and its progeny.
However, if not so constrained, for the reasons set forth in City of Burlington v. *669Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 112 S.Ct. 2638, 120 L.Ed.2d 449 (1992), I would hold that contingency multipliers should not be utilized in statutory fee-authorizing cases.