Court Opinion

ID: 2863158
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:14:12.561374+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:07:35.700962
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-99-00201-CR

Quintus Lee Ploch, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR4556, HONORABLE CLAYTON E. EVANS, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Quintus Lee Ploch was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after he pleaded guilty to aggravated assault.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02
(West 1994).  The district court subsequently revoked supervision on the State's motion,
adjudicated guilt, and imposed sentence of imprisonment for ten years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d
137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				                                                                       

				Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Affirmed

Filed:   March 9, 2000

Do Not Publish