Court Opinion

ID: 9817642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 04:35:49.703635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:55.247328
License: Public Domain

*632BYE, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
For the reasons articulated in my dissent in United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 562-67 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc) (Bye, J., dissenting), I join Judge Heaney in “adher[ing] to the view that defendants who did not properly preserve their Booker claims in the district court are nonetheless entitled to resentencing under a constitutional regime.” Like Judge Heaney, however, I recognize we are bound by the holding of our en banc court, and I therefore concur.