Court Opinion

ID: 2281671
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:58:27.224826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:31:53.727347
License: Public Domain

329 S.W.3d 405 (2011)
Eugene A. DOWNEY, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 93957.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
January 11, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Eugene A. Downey, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).