Court Opinion

ID: 4571768
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-10-01 13:08:52.694555+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:39.537238
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4680.]

                        DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SPINAZZE.
          [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___,
                                    2020-Ohio-4680.]
  (No. 2019-1075—Submitted September 29, 2020—Decided October 1, 2020.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Anthony Perin Spinazze, Attorney
Registration No. 0071893, last known business address in Sylvania, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 17, 2020,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from
the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially
complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, 159 Ohio St.3d
187, 2020-Ohio-957, 149 N.E.3d 503.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,
and STEWART, JJ., concur.
                             ________________________