Court Opinion

ID: 4614540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-21 02:30:25.613233+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:54:48.318208
License: Public Domain

ESTATE OF A. F. T. COOPER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Cooper v. CommissionerDocket No. 12634.United States Board of Tax Appeals9 B.T.A. 21; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2686; November 8, 1927, Promulgated *2686  A trust estate under the control of a resident fiduciary and subject to the jurisdiction of the State of Wyoming is not a nonresident alien and taxable as such under the Revenue Act of 1918.  A. W. McCullough, Esq., for the petitioner.  M. N. Fisher, Esq., for the respondent.  SIEFKIN*21  The Commissioner determined a deficiency for 1919 of $240, caused by treating the petitioner as a nonresident alien individual of Great Britain and Ireland with a resulting refusal to allow a credit of $1,000 (since Great Britain and Ireland are held not to satisfy the "similar credit" clause of section 216(e) of the 1918 Act) and the computation of the normal tax at 8 per cent.  The question is put in issue by the pleadings, the answer of the respondent having admitted the material facts which are here found.  FINDINGS OF FACT.  Petitioner is a trust estate under the control of a resident fiduciary and subject to the jurisdiction of the State of Wyoming.  *22  The deficiency of $240 for 1919 results from the treatment of the petitioner by the respondent as a nonresident alien individual of Great Britain and Ireland.  OPINION.  SIEFKIN: The pertinent*2687  provisions of the Revenue Act of 1918 are as follows: SEC. 210.  * * * There shall be levied, collected, and paid for each taxable year upon the net income of every individual a normal tax at the following rates * * * (b) For each calendar year thereafter [after 1918], 8 per centum of the amount of the net income in excess of the credits provided in section 216: Provided, that in the case of a citizen or resident of the United States the rate upon the first $4,000 of such excess amount shall be 4 per centum.  SEC. 216.  That for the purposes of the normal tax only there shall be allowed the following credits * * * (c) In the case of a single person, a personal exemption of $1,000 * * *.  SEC. 219. (a) That the tax imposed by sections 210 and 211 shall apply to the income of estates or of any kind of property held in trust, including - (1) Income received by estates of deceased persons during the period of administration or settlement of the estate * * * (c) In cases under paragraph (1) * * * of subdivision (a) the tax shall be imposed upon the net income of the estate or trust and shall be paid by the fiduciary * * *.  In such cases the estate or trust shall, for the purpose*2688  of the normal tax, be allowed the same credits as are allowed to single persons under section 216.  SEC. 1.  * * * The term "taxpayer" includes any person, trust or estate subject to a tax imposed by this Act * * *.  SEC. 200.  * * * The term "fiduciary" means * * * administrator * * * or any person acting in any fiduciary capacity for any person, trust or estate; * * * We have no doubt that the Revenue Act of 1918, applicable here, indicates a clear intent by Congress to treat an estate as a separate taxable entity.  When we further consider those cases in the Federal courts in which diversity of citizenship has been held uniformly to depend upon the status of the trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, etc., rather than the status of their principals, whether decedents, heirs, or other beneficiaries (as ; ; ) we have no hesitation in holding that the petitioner, in this case, is not a nonresident alien of Great Britain and Ireland and that*2689  the deficiency asserted on that basis must fall.  See also , which holds, under the Acts of 1916 and 1917, that in the case of trusts or estates the trustee, administrator or executor is the taxable person.  Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.Considered by TRAMMELL, MORRIS, and MURDOCK.