Court Opinion

ID: 3966491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:26:00.535855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:52.173910
License: Public Domain

Appellant complains that the certificate of the trial judge contained in what is denominated a supplemental transcript has no place in the record. It is manifest from our original opinion that we ordinarily would not have felt called upon to consider either the statement *Page 352 
of facts or the contents of the supplemental transcript, but we felt that in fairness to both the state and appellant we should not consider one without also considering the other. Having done this, the conclusion was reached that the judgment should be affirmed. If we had followed the ordinary course and consider neither, then an affirmance in the absence of a statement of facts would have been demanded. The same result, in so far as appellant is concerned, would have been reached in either event.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.