Court Opinion

ID: 9403604
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-21 15:06:20.663528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:08.268416
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed June 21, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-0017
               Lower Tribunal Nos. F98-36722, & F99-4398
                          ________________

                               Marco Pace,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                         The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert T. Watson, Judge.

     Marco Pace, in proper person.

     Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before HENDON, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290 (Fla. 2003)

(“Although res judicata may not apply to motions filed under rule 3.800, the

similar, but more narrow, doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion,

does apply.”); Ali v. State, 911 So. 2d 164, 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“[T]he

trial court correctly denied the defendant’s claim regarding lack of notice as

this claim may not be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 . . . .”).

                                       2