Court Opinion

ID: 6275266
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 15:57:36.226214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:02.462410
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam,
To the petition filed by Ella B. Gordon for the appointment of five viewers, in conformity with the Act of May 24, 1878, P. L. 129, to assess her damages caused by the change of grade or grades therein described, the borough filed an answer, and upon consideration of the petition and answer the court made the following order: “ And now, December 28, 1905, it is ordered and directed that if the petitioner and borough authorities cannot agree upon the names of viewers to act in this case, that either of them shall have the right to apply to the court within ten days from this date for the appointment of such viewers as the court may select in the premises.” Thereupon the borough took this appeal. When the proceedings thus instituted reach final judgment, an appeal will lie in which the legality and regularity of the proceeding from the beginning *543may be reviewed, but the statute does not contemplate a separate appeal from each interlocutory order, as this undoubtedly is. Therefore the motion to quash must be allowed.
Appeal quashed at the costs of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.