Court Opinion

ID: 8425100
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 01:18:55.658056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:29.603785
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh, No. CA-03-4-1-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED