Court Opinion

ID: 4413918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-07-03 19:47:26.336867+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:36:40.906490
License: Public Domain

People v Desiderio-Manrique (2019 NY Slip Op 05416)

People v Desiderio-Manrique

2019 NY Slip Op 05416

Decided on July 3, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 3, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2016-03635
 (Ind. No. 213/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vJesus Desiderio-Manrique, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Meredith S. Holt of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (William Garnett, J.), imposed March 7, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).
MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court