Court Opinion

ID: 4443972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-03 16:08:06.085439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:50.786998
License: Public Domain

People v Gooden (2019 NY Slip Op 07145)

People v Gooden

2019 NY Slip Op 07145

Decided on October 3, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2019

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Singh, JJ.

9988 3249/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vDavid Gooden, Defendant-Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find any overassessment of points or mitigating factors that were inadequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. The evidence before the hearing court, which assessed 150 points, demonstrated defendant's high risk of reoffense and did not warrant a departure.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 3, 2019
CLERK