Court Opinion

ID: 7359203
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 05:42:55.588058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:29.942214
License: Public Domain

GUY, J.
The return in this case is fatally defective. On the return day the defendant filed an affidavit by its president, stating that he had been handed two papers, one a copy of the summons, and the other a copy of an alias summons. What motion, if any, was made thereon, does not appear; but there is an order directing that the service of the summons be set aside, and the complaint dismissed, and that judgment be entered for the defendant. This was on the ground that no jurisdiction was obtained over the defendant in failing to serve it with copies of all the alias that had been issued on affidavit filed. No judgment has yet, so far as the return shows, ever been entered upon this order. The clerk’s certificate recites as follows:
“The case here closed. The justice presiding * * * thereupon, to wit, on 8th day of March, 1915, indorsed on summons: ‘Dismissed; defective summons on affidavit filed.’ ”
This is not a judgment entered in any form. An appeal from an order dismissing a complaint will not lie. Kromback v. Penn. Steel Co., 84 N. Y. Supp. 297.
Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. All concur.