Court Opinion

ID: 9409675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-19 06:07:27.073202+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:52.720885
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed July 14, 2023

                                   S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00554-CV

          IN RE SUNOCO RETAIL LLC, SUNOCO, LLC,
   SUNOCO ENERGY SERVICES LLC, GOPETRO TRANSPORT LLC,
              AND DERRICK RAY LEWIS, Relators

           Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-18306

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
                   Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy
                           Opinion by Justice Kennedy
      Before the Court is relators’ June 2, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus

wherein relators challenge the trial court’s April 18, 2023 Order of Transfer.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Nancy Kennedy/
                                         NANCY KENNEDY
                                         JUSTICE

230554F.P05

                                      –2–