Court Opinion

ID: 9949447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-11 18:00:52.968773+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:24.750639
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40298            Document: 44-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/11/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                   ____________                                         Fifth Circuit

                                                                                      FILED
                                    No. 23-40298                                   March 11, 2024
                                  Summary Calendar                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                  ____________                                          Clerk

United States of America,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Gilbert Delossantos,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:22-CR-347-1
                   ______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Gilbert Delossantos has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Delossantos has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40298      Document: 44-1     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/11/2024

                              No. 23-40298

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                   2