Court Opinion

ID: 1007476
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:25:59.050466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:07.731903
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-6027

JUAN TAPANES,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

ART BEELER,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-929-5-BO)

Submitted:    April 25, 2002                  Decided:   May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Tapanes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Juan Tapanes appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.     We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   Tapanes v. Beeler, No. CA-01-929-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2