Court Opinion

ID: 8452184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:55:54.22223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.615018
License: Public Domain

ORDER

Jesse Johnson pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine and crack cocaine with intent to distribute, and was sentenced to 188 months imprisonment. On March 14, 2002, this Court affirmed Johnson’s conviction and sentence. A few years later, the defendant filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in light of the Sentencing Commission’s retroactive amendments to the crack cocaine guidelines. In his motion, Johnson claimed that the district court had authority to reduce his sentence below the two offense-level reduction authorized by the Sentencing Commission. The district court rejected defendant’s contention in this regard, reducing Johnson’s sentence only by the two levels allowed in the retroactive amendments. Johnson now appeals.
Our recent opinion in United States v. Cunningham, 554 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.2009) dealt with this same issue. In that case, we concluded that, with an exception not relevant here, district courts do not have authority to reduce a defendant’s sentence under § 3582(c)(2) to a sentence lower than the retroactive Guideline amendment range. We adopt the reasoning and holding of that case, and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.