Court Opinion

ID: 9387684
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-18 18:00:37.075946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:15.102136
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-20403        Document: 00516715725             Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/18/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                     ____________                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                     FILED
                                      No. 22-20403                               April 18, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                                                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                    ____________                                     Clerk

   Wayne Smith,

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellant,

                                            versus

   David Hittner; MTGLQ Investors, L.P.; Brandon
   Hakari; Charles Eskridge; Sam S. Shelton; Clare I.
   Cougill; Marilyn Burgess,

                                              Defendants—Appellees.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:21-CV-3079
                     ______________________________

   Before Clement, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         Wayne Smith appeals the dismissal of his case under Federal Rule of
   Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). “We review de novo the grant of a Rule 12(b)(6)
   motion to dismiss.” Lampton v. Diaz, 639 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir. 2011)
   (citation omitted). Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find Smith

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-20403    Document: 00516715725         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/18/2023

                                 No. 22-20403

   hasn’t shown that he stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. See
   Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). So, we AFFIRM and all pending motions are
   DENIED.

                                          2