Court Opinion

ID: 1020681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:54:56.745423+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:36.834426
License: Public Domain

*612
   
  PER CURIAM:
 

  Terence Jerome Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Richardson,
  
  No. 3:00-cr-00383-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.