Court Opinion

ID: 6422726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:01:20.106096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:51:50.829992
License: Public Domain

Knowlton, J.
At the trial the plaintiffs rested their claim to the replevied horses solely upon their title and right of possession as assignees in insolvency of George W. Davis. There was evidence tending to show that one Bridges was a part owner of the horses, but the jury were instructed in effect that it was immaterial whether Bridges was or was not a joint owner with the plaintiffs, and that if the plaintiffs showed that they were owners or part owners of the property replevied they could recover.
In the recent case of Fay v. Duggan, 135 Mass. 242, it was - held, upon a review of the. authorities, that one of two or more joint owners of a chattel cannot maintain replevin for it without joining the other part owners as plaintiffs. That case is decisive of the one at bar. Exceptions sustained.