Court Opinion

ID: 8431684
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 07:37:52.55042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:37.473733
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Rebecca B. Dye and James A. Bailey appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dye v. Hatfield, No. CA-03-1077-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 26, 2004; entered Aug. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED