Court Opinion

ID: 989072
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:01:48.488007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:17.627353
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7739

JAMES HARRIS, a/k/a John Wiley,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

LIEUTENANT COLONEL TEGETOFF; ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
95-2606-CCB)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 25, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismiss-

ing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition for

failure to exhaust state court remedies. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris
v. Tegetoff, No. CA-95-2606-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 18, 1995). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2