Court Opinion

ID: 3661064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:12:36.584958+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:07.473124
License: Public Domain

This case was tried below since the first day of the present term of this Court. If the appeal had not been docketed here till the call of causes from that district at the next term of this Court it would have been in time. Rule 5. But the same rule provides that it may be docketed at this term, and the Court has often held that if, by complying with the statutory provisions as to time in settling cases, the *Page 323 
appeal gets here at this term before the expiration of the time for docketing cases from that district it stands regularly for argument at this term. Avery v. Pritchard, 106 N.C. 344 (at bottom of page 346);Porter v. R. R., ib., 478; S. v. Deyton, 119 N.C. 880. Here, by observing the statutory regulations, the appeal has gotten here after that district has been passed, and hence is not entitled to be heard as a right, but being a case affecting the title to public office it comes within Rule 13, and the Court may set it down for argument. This was done under similar circumstances in Houghtalling v. Taylor, 122 N.C. 141, which involved the title to the office of county commissioner and was set for hearing some weeks after the call of the district to which it belonged. Like the case before us, it was tried below after the beginning of the present term of this Court. The appellant's case on appeal was accepted by the appellee on 22 November and filed in the clerk's office that day. The Code, section 551, then makes it the duty of the clerk to send up the transcript within twenty days (S. v. Deyton, 119 N.C. 880,) though in civil cases he is not required to do so unless his fees therefor are paid (Bailey v. Brown, 105 N.C. 127; S. v. Nash, 109 N.C. 822); but if the clerk sends it up at once, instead of taking the whole twenty days, or does not stand on his right to exact his cost in advance, the appellant cannot complain and the case is regularly here.       (425)
The motion of appellant to put the case off the docket has, therefore, neither merit nor precedent to sustain it, and in view of the importance of the case to the public the appellee's motion is granted and it will stand for argument on Saturday, 4 December. If the call of causes from the Tenth District has not then been closed, this case will be called on the Monday following.
Motion allowed.
Cited: Post, s. c., 480; S. v. Gragg, 122 N.C. 1086; Brafford v. Reed,124 N.C. 346; Clegg v. R. R., 132 N.C. 293.