Court Opinion

ID: 8455128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:23:36.228178+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.177569
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John William Fishback appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Maryland, No. 1:12-cv-00927-JFM, 2012 WL 1145034 (D.Md. Apr. 4, 2012). We deny Fishback’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.