Court Opinion

ID: 7983748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 01:22:48.455136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:35:07.687094
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Fisher
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a motion in the circuit court of Jackson county, to quash an' execution, and set aside a sale of land, by virtue of the same. Notice appears to have been given to the plaintiff in the execution as well as the purchaser of the land. On the trial, the court sustained the motion, by quashing the execution and setting aside the sale.
The record presents this state of facts. The plaintiff below bad recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Jackson county against the defendant; in entering the verdict and judgment, ,the word “ dollars ” was omitted. The entry is this :• “ We, the jury,, do assess the damages of the plaintiff to the sum of five hundred and eighty 25-100.” “ It is, therefore, considered by the 'court that the plaintiff do recover of the defendant, the sum of five hundred and eighty 25-100, and his costs.” Upon this judgment an' execution was issued, and levied upon certain lands, which were sold by the sheriff.. The execution follows the judgment, except that the word “dollars” is added.
It Is insisted by counsel, that this judgment is void, as it does not specify the amount for which it is rendered. The suit was brought to recover a certain amount of money, or number of dollars. The verdict and judgment must correspond with the suit; and we must, therefore, understand that the verdict was for the thing sued for, namely, the dollars specified in the declaration. Under this view of the question, while we are of opin*190ion, that, for the sake of greater certainty, the word dollars should be used in rendering judgments in actions to recover money, yet where it is manifest that the omission is a mere clerical error, and where it is clear that the judgment was intended to be for $580.25, it is not void, and will uphold an execution for dollars and cents to the amount specified in the judgment. It was, therefore, error in the court below to quash the execution and set aside the sale.
Judgment reversed, sale of land to stand, and motion in court below overruled.