Court Opinion

ID: 4798451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-20 22:10:26.824266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:04.939998
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) (explaining that a trial court should allow amendment of a 3.850 motion for the purpose of correcting a facial deficiency); Henderson v. State, 919 *950So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Overton v. State, 976 So.2d 536, 545-46 (Fla.2007).
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.