Court Opinion

ID: 519443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:59:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:38:19.763229
License: Public Domain

869 F.2d 594Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James Earl MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Larry W. HUFFMAN;  Dr. Ozinal Sandra Earley;  Brenda Ross;James Hite;  Wayne Rankin, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-7314.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  Jan. 3, 1989.Decided:  Feb. 16, 1989.

James E. Marshall, appellant pro se.
Mark R. Davis (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellee Huffman.
Janet P. Selph (McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe), for remaining appellees.
Before CHAPMAN, SPOUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
James Earl Marshall appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Marshall v. Huffman, C/A No. 88-50 (W.D.Va. Nov. 4, 1988).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.