Court Opinion

ID: 5215463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:22:03.798647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:25.907483
License: Public Domain

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the indebtedness in question was contracted prior to the time when the defendants became stockholders of the corporation, withiq the meaning of section 56 of the Stock Corporation Law.*

 See Gen. Laws, chap. 36 (Laws of 1892, chap. 688), § 54, as amd. by Laws of 1901, chap. 354; revised into Consol. Laws, chap. 59 (Laws of 1909, chap. 61), §56.—[Rep.