Court Opinion

ID: 712470
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:37:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:34:31.341264
License: Public Domain

76 F.3d 376
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Theron Rath LIVINGSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-5231.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.Decided Feb. 2, 1996.

David L. Zeiger, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.   Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, John F. Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Theron Rath Livingston pled guilty to one count of distributing crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1981 & Supp.1995), and was sentenced to serve a term of 70 months imprisonment.   He contends on appeal that the district court erred in departing downward by only two offense levels under USSG § 5K1.1,* as requested by the government.   We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

2
The extent of a downward departure cannot be challenged on appeal by a defendant unless the departure resulted in a sentence imposed in violation of law or resulted from an incorrect application of the guidelines.  United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir.1995).   Livingston asserts that the district court failed to make an independent assessment of the usefulness of his cooperation.   However, the record does not bear out his assertion.   The district court heard an extensive discussion of Livingston's cooperation both from the government and from Livingston's wife and mother.   Livingston also submitted a chronology of his efforts to assist the government.   The district court found that Livingston's delay in entering his guilty plea and beginning his cooperation had diminished his ability to provide useful information.   We find that the district court properly assessed Livingston's assistance before deciding that a two-level departure was appropriate.

3
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
 United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (Nov.1994)