Court Opinion

ID: 3980772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:37:42.675015+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:12.541142
License: Public Domain

This suit was brought in the Justice court of precinct No. 1, Dallas county, Tex., on the 27th day of August, A.D. 1914, by the appellee E. M. Collins and wife, Lizzie Collins, against Wm. Kelly, the appellant herein, for damages in the sum of $150.
The defendant answered and a jury trial, March 30, 1915, resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $35. From this judgment the defendant appealed to the county court, and in that court a jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of $87.50, from which the appeal to this court is prosecuted. In the county court the defendant filed and urged a motion to strike out the transcript and dismiss the appeal from the justice court on the ground that said transcript did not contain a statement of the nature or character of plaintiff's cause of action, did not inform or advise the defendant of the time of the accrual of plaintiff's cause of action or whether it was one arising ex contractu or ex delicto. The statement of the plaintiff's cause of action upon the docket of the justice of the peace is: "Suit upon damages for $150.00 of date ________ due _______ interest ________ per cent." This is not as full and accurate a statement of the plaintiff's cause of action as the defendant was entitled to, but the county court correctly refused to sustain defendant's motion and strike out the transcript from the justice court and dismiss the appeal. The defendant's remedy for the general and imperfect statement of plaintiff's cause of action was the presentation of a special demurrer thereto, and not a motion to strike out the transcript and dismiss the appeal. The record fails to disclose that he sought to avail himself of this remedy either in the justice court or in the county court. Having thus failed to except to the statement of plaintiff's cause of action, he is in no position to ask this court to reverse the judgment rendered against him.
The judgment of the county court is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.