Court Opinion

ID: 989653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:10:07.799857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:31.174997
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-7996

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

FRANKLIN DALE BROWNER, SR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-80-G)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                 Decided:   June 27, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Dale Browner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for a return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Pro-

cedure 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Browner, No. CR-
90-80-G (M.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2