Court Opinion

ID: 9517291
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:12:53.947587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:16.969781
License: Public Domain

Spencer, J.,
dissenting.
I do not agree with the majority opinion that Central Constr. Co. v. Osbahr, 186 Neb. 1, 180 N. W. 2d 139, is distinguishable from the instant case. The present action is one in equity to reform the written instrument. The Osbahr case was a mechanic’s lien foreclosure, which accomplished the same purpose. I believe the Osbahr case to be applicable to the facts: herein. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.
McCown, J., joins in this dissent.