Court Opinion

ID: 8767045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 12:29:11.868639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:57.241711
License: Public Domain

NOYES, Circuit Judge.
The merchandise consists of trimmed hats. The bodies are made of fur and the trimmings of silk. Silk *926is the component material of chief value in the completed hat; fur, in the body considered by itself.
The hats were assessed for duty as “wearing" apparel of which silk is the component material of chief value,” under paragraph 390 of the tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule L, 30 Stat. 187 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1670]). The importer claims that the hats should have been assessed under paragraph 432 of the act:
“Hats * * * trimmed or untrimmed * * * composed wholly or in chief value of fur of the rabbit, beaver, or other animals. * * * ”
The importer contends that only the body should be considered in determining that which is the most valuable material in the hat. But as the. statute speaks specifically of trimmed hats — a completed article — it is impossible to perceive any ground for the contention. The articles in question' are trimmed hats not composed in chief value of fur, and are manifestly outside of paragraph 432.
The claim of the importer that the Board of Appraisers in considering other paragraphs of the act have not always ruled consistently with their decision in the present case is not a matter in which we can be expected to express interest. It certainly has no bearing upon •our decision here.
The decision of the Circuit Court is affirmed.