Court Opinion

ID: 2905177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:54:21.636089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:59.844185
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-04-203 CR

____________________

PHILLIP PAUL MUNIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 03-183635

MEMORANDUM OPINION
 A jury found Phillip Paul Muniz guilty of driving while intoxicated.  Tex. Pen.
Code Ann. § 49.04 (a), (b) (Vernon 2003).  The jury assessed punishment for the Class
B misdemeanor offense at 90 days of jail confinement and a $1,000 fine.  Tex. Pen.
Code. Ann. § 12.22 (Vernon 2003).
	The brief filed by Muniz's appellate counsel concludes no arguable error is
presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On
May 19, 2005, we granted an extension of time for Muniz to file a pro se brief.  We
received no response from the appellant. 
	We have reviewed the entire record, and find no error that will arguably support
an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal.  Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991).  The judgment is affirmed.
	AFFIRMED.
								___________________________
								      STEVE McKEITHEN
									    Chief Justice

Submitted on October 10, 2005
Opinion Delivered November 16, 2005
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.