Court Opinion

ID: 4423909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-08 16:00:39.804072+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:21.968587
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                  PANDUIT CORP.,
                     Appellant

                           v.

  CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
                  Appellee
           ______________________

                      2018-1999
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
00009.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT
GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN
STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT,
Washington, DC.

   JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by HANNAH
LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES,
Chicago, IL.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

      PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir-
cuit Judges).
             AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

  August 8, 2019                 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
      Date                       Peter R. Marksteiner
                                 Clerk of Court