Court Opinion

ID: 9493953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 15:24:29.064696+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:56:07.788302
License: Public Domain

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge,
dissenting in part,
I agree that the petition for rehearing should be granted and the original opinion withdrawn. Waiting for the United States Supreme Court to decide whether a federal habeas petition tolls the year limitation period is useful, because it will let Jiminez know whether he will have any time to file a new or amended petition after he exhausts state remedies. It is not necessary to wait for Walker, however, to review the district court’s dismissal of this petition, since it was filed before the year period expired. Because it contained unexhaust-ed claims, it should have been dismissed without prejudice. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1605-06, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).