Court Opinion

ID: 3668633
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:17:50.404051+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:08.064161
License: Public Domain

It is admitted in the answer and set out in the judgment that the defendants at the time of the alleged trespass were acting in their capacity as road commissioners of Bentonville Township. There is no allegation that they acted maliciously or corruptly. Hipp v. Ferrall,169 N.C. 551; S. c., 173 N.C. 167. The judgment contains the further recital that the action was instituted against public road officials; that more than six months intervened between the completion of the road and the commencement of the action; that the plaintiff knew within two months of the completion of the road that it had been laid out and opened, and that it has been accepted and is now used by the county authorities. C. S., 3667. On motion of the defendants the court dismissed the action. The judgment is affirmed. An objection that the complaint does not state a cause of action may be taken advantage of at any time. In such case the defendant may demur ore tenus or the Supreme Court of its own motion may take notice of the insufficiency. Johnson v. Finch, 93 N.C. 205; Garrisonv. Williams, 150 N.C. 674; McDonald v. MacArthur, 154 N.C. 122.
Affirmed.