Court Opinion

ID: 2885125
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 18:08:58.560481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:20.541740
License: Public Domain

WILLIAM THOMAS LANGLEY V. STATE 

NO. 07-
00-0071-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL 
D

MAY 16, 2000

___________________________________

WILLIAM THOMAS LANGLEY
, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
, 

Appellee

___________________________________

FROM THE 
195TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF 
DALLAS
 COUNTY; 

NO. 
F-99-36707-RN
; HON. 
JOHN NELMS
, PRESIDING

___________________________________

BEFORE BOYD, C.J, and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

 

Appellant, William Thomas Langley, plead guilty to the offense of aggravated assault and entered into a Plea Agreement wherein he was sentenced to 2 years confinement in the penitentiary and a fine of $300.  Appellant timely appealed from the judgment entered by the court.

Thereafter, appellant’s court appointed counsel filed an appellant’s brief, pursuant to a 
Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), concluding that the record reflects no reversible error, that there are no arguable points of law, and that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.  
Thus, he asked permission to withdraw, after serving appellant with a copy of the brief and informing him of his right to file a 
pro se
 response and to review the record.  After we granted counsel’s motion to withdraw, we directed appellant, via a letter dated April 10, 2000, to file a 
pro se
 brief no later than May 10, 2000.  To date, appellant has not filed a brief.

We have conducted our own independent review of the record pursuant to 
Stafford v. State
, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring same).  Upon doing so, we too are unable to find any arguable or reversible error.  Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Brian Quinn

    Justice

Do not publish.