Court Opinion

ID: 3938856
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:02:58.899833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:01:37.762595
License: Public Domain

Appellant was convicted in the Justice Court, and prosecuted an appeal to the County Court. The appeal was there dismissed on account of the bond not being in double the amount of the fine and costs. Appellant prayed the right to give a new bond, and proffered a new bond, in double the amount of free and costs, in resistance to the motion to dismiss his appeal. The appeal, however, was dismissed, and he prosecutes an appeal to this court.
He assigns as error the action of the court, below in dismissing his appeal. We think the action of the court in dismissing said appeal was in conformity with the statute on the subject, authorizing appeals from the justice to the county court. See Code Crim. Proc. 1895, arts. 889, *Page 546 
890. Said articles require that bond shall be given with security in double the amount of the fine and costs; the same to be filled and approved by the justice within ten days after the judgment of the court refusing a new trial has been rendered and not afterwards. Miller v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 275. In that case appellant offered to file a good and sufficient bond in double the amount, which was refused; and it was there held that the action of the court was correct. If an excuse could be offered for failure to file such bond, it has not been done in this case. Appellant insists that he did not have a lawyer, but relied on the constable and the justice of the peace to perfect his appeal. This affords no excuse. The law requires and places the obligation on him to perfect his appeal; and if he had procured a lawyer, and his own lawyer had made the same mistake, it could not avail him anything. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.