Court Opinion

ID: 656515
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:53:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:50.196996
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Joaquin REYNOSO-THEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6282.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 24, 1993.Decided:  October 20, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.  Robert D. Potter, District Judge.  (CR-89-140, CA-91-124-P)
Jose Joaquin Reynoso-Then, Appellant Pro Se.
Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Jose Joaquin Reynoso-Then appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Reynoso-Then, Nos.  CR-89-140; CA-91-124-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED