Court Opinion

ID: 9565594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 19:24:10.863433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:46.577467
License: Public Domain

SHEPARD, Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the result obtained by most of the majority opinion. However, I disagree with part IB wherein defendant Kolouch’s tortious conduct is transformed into conduct in breach of contract and hence insulated from liability because she was a corporate officer of PBS. The thrust of plaintiffs-cross-appellants’ argument has not been answered, i.e., Kolouch’s acts constituted a tortious interference with the contractual relationship between the doctors and their patients.
I further disagree with the majority opinion, part IV, in its affirmation of the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest. I do not view the record as demonstrating that the liability was clearly ascertainable and liquidated.