Court Opinion

ID: 5087679
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 14:30:36.141995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:29.402596
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
David P. Talley appeals convictions of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. He received sentences of 15 and 21 years respectively, to be served consecutively as a persistent offender and a class X offender. He also appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. Issues on appeal include Talley’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant Talley’s motion for a mistrial, which was made after the jury allegedly observed Talley handcuffed in the hallway. Talley also complains that comments made by the prosecution in closing argument warranted a mistrial and that the court abused its discretion in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial. Finally, Talley complains that the post-conviction motion court erred in denying the motion for post-conviction relief because trial *732defense counsel failed to object to the State’s closing argument.
The judgments are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).