Court Opinion

ID: 7932534
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:05:59.603971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:24.273502
License: Public Domain

Campbell, C. J.
We are asked to interfere by mandamus to compel a circuit judge to dissolve an injunction which he has declined to set aside. Its purport is to prevent relator from redressing, by its own act, a grievance which it claims to be illegal, but which the complainant in equity insists was no grievance, but a legal right to take possession of a crossing, and keep it up, beneath relator’s railway. The injunction does not, and could not, prevent relator from resorting to any and all legal remedies, civil and criminal.
A mandamus to disturb action by a judge in equity can ■only issue upon some exigency that requires prompt action to prevent mischief. The only end to be reached by the action sought is to remove obstructions to allowing relator to use active measures, outside of legal proceedings,' to prevent the further use and occupancy of the disputed territory. So long as the law is open, we do not think we are called upon to use our extraordinary powers with a view of assisting private redress of supposed wrongs. Whether the injunction was right or wrong, we do not think the exigency is of such a nature that we should interfere by summary process in the matter.
The other Justices concurred.