Court Opinion

ID: 9389718
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-26 06:07:49.611961+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:29.195500
License: Public Domain

DENY and Opinion Filed April 19, 2023

                                    S  In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                No. 05-23-00079-CV

                            IN RE LYFT, INC., Relator

              Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5
                               Dallas County, Texas
                       Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01321-E

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
                     Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel
                              Opinion by Justice Nowell
      Relator’s January 24, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial

court’s order requiring relator to produce information regarding excess insurance

policies without a confidentiality designation. Entitlement to mandamus relief

requires relator to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and

that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

      After reviewing the petition, the record, and the amicus filings before us, we

conclude that relator has failed to show that the trial court clearly abused its

discretion.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Erin A. Nowell/
                                         ERIN A. NOWELL
                                         JUSTICE

230079F.P05

                                      –2–