Court Opinion

ID: 7683563
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:15:12.976622+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:33.750330
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The denial of appellant’s motion for a “proposed order to clarify sentence” is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking relief with respect to gain time by filing either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. See Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hall v. *355Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.