Court Opinion

ID: 9548523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:04:56.443509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:19:05.543551
License: Public Domain

Worswick, C.J. (concurring)
I do not agree that Gardner's actions do not reveal an inclination to frustrate the authority of the court. To the contrary, I am satisfied that once she sees the inside of a jail, the activity on this file will decline sharply. However, I concur in the result because a series of cases culminating in State v. Boatman, 104 Wn.2d 44, 700 P.2d 1152 (1985) requires a trial court to frame these orders in a certain way in order to have them pass appellate muster. This is not hard to do, but all judicial officers dealing with these matters should read the cases carefully to assure that it is done right.
Reconsideration denied July 31, 1986.