Court Opinion

ID: 5572663
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:15:57.56346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:49.055708
License: Public Domain

Cobb and Lamab, JJ.,
dissenting. Tor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Jones v. Stewart, 117 Ga. 977, we can not agree with the majority of the court in the conclusion reached by them that the tax execution was void.
W. E. S. Searcy Jr. and Estes & Jones, for plaintiff,
cited 109 Ga. 227, 463; 68 Ga. 311; 62 Ga. 485; 59 Ga. 805.
O. H. B. Bloodworth, solicitor-general, for defendants,
cited Acts 1902, p. 24; Pol. Code, § 903; 59 Ga. 807; 101 Ga. 295; 49 Ga. 201; 27 Ga. 357; 33 Ga. 622; 42 Ga. 424; 46 Ga. 350, 360; 48 Ga. 138; 106 Ga. 846; 67 Ga. 293; 33 Ga. 344; 29 Ga. 621; 15 Ga. 361; 2 Ga. 85; 3 Ga. 22; 34 Ga. 457; 35 Ga. 319; Cool. Tax. (2d ed.) 264; 38 Conn. 443; 94 Penn. St. 450; 5 Wheat. 76.