Court Opinion

ID: 6698810
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 22:03:12.01377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:20.619801
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
This appeal should have been docketed in this Court on or before 10 :00 a.m., Tuesday, 3 September, 1946, and appellant’s brief filed by noon 7 September, 1946. Rules 5 and 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 546 and 562, et seq. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.
We also find that the affidavit upon which the order for appeal in forma pauperis is based, was made more than ten days after the adjournment of the term of court at which the defendant was tried. Such affidavit must be made during the term or within ten days of the adjournment thereof, G. S., 15-182, otherwise this Court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, S. v. Holland, 211 N. C., 284, 189 S. E., 761; S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.
Even though we have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal, since the life of the defendant is involved, we have examined the only exception the defendant undertakes to have this Court consider on the appeal. The exception is without merit and would not be sustained if the appeal were properly before us.
The record proper having been docketed in this Court, the judgment of the court below is affirmed and the motion of the Attorney-General is allowed.
Appeal dismissed.