Court Opinion

ID: 17748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:07:31+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:12.101221
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-10852
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LONNIE D. CLARK, a/k/a Chick Clark,

                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 94-CR-18-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                            June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     This court must determine the basis of its jurisdiction, on

its own motion, if necessary.    Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987).   FED. R. APP. P. 4(b) requires that a notice of

appeal by a defendant in a criminal case be filed within 10 days

of the entry of judgment.   The rule allows the district court to

grant an additional 30 days in which to file the notice of appeal

upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause.     FED. R. APP.

P. 4(b)(4).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 98-10852
                                -2-

     We previously remanded Clark’s case for the district court

to make findings regarding whether Clark’s late notice of appeal

could be excused pursuant to Rule 4(b)(4).   The district court

found that Clark’s late notice of appeal could not be so excused.

The district court’s determination was not an abuse of

discretion.   United States v. Clark, 51 F.3d 42, 43 n.5 (5th Cir.

1995).   We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider Clark’s

appeal; the appeal therefore is DISMISSED for want of

jurisdiction and our previous grant of leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) is RESCINDED as improvidently granted.

     APPEAL DISMISSED.