Court Opinion

ID: 4125597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-13 18:00:35.235735+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:51.418693
License: Public Domain

OPINION
  
   *
  

  PER CURIAM
 

  Joel Diaz-Hinirio pleaded guilty to federal drug and firearms offenses, but he preserved his ability to appeal the District Court’s order denying in part his motions to suppress. Diaz-Hinirio appealed' that ruling at C.A. No. 13-3198. In that appeal, we remanded for the District Court to “state its essential findings on the record” as required by Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
 

  Diaz-Hinirio has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court to comply with our mandate. On December 10, 2016, however, the District Court issued a detailed 59-page opinion explaining its reasons for denying in part Diaz-Hinirio’s motions to suppress. (ECF No. ,237.) Thus, Diaz-Hinirio’s petition is moot, and we will dismiss it on that basis.
 

   *
  

   This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.