Court Opinion

ID: 2938732
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 19:58:11.765891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:47.099342
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-65,592-02

RODNEY CURTIS BIBLE, Relator

v.

 JUDGE, 204TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. F05-51098-Q IN THE 204TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction
of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 204th Judicial
District Court of Dallas County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet
been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues
on October 19, 2006.
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the judge of the 204th  District
Court of Dallas County, is ordered to file a response with this Court by having the District Clerk submit
the record on such habeas corpus application or by setting out the reasons that no findings have been made
since the order designating issues was entered. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be
held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be
submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 26, 2007
Do not publish