Court Opinion

ID: 998168
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:07:11.847481+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:07.792472
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

GEORGE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Dave,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-94-89, CA-97-753)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     George Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.     See United States v. Chambers,

Nos. CR-94-89; CA-97-753 (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1998).    We deny Cham-

bers’ motion for an evidentiary hearing and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2