Court Opinion

ID: 397270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:19:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:40:58.421258
License: Public Domain

665 F.2d 269
Miguel TEJEDA-MATA, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 78-3651.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 1981.
ORDER

1
Before CHOY and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS,* District judge.

2
Appellant petitioned for a rehearing of this case and suggested that it be reheard en banc.  By order filed on February 18, 1981, a majority of the full court ordered a rehearing en banc pursuant to this court's Rule 25, withdrawing the original three-judge panel assignment of this case.

3
By order filed on September 22, 1981, the en banc court returned this case to the original three-judge panel on the ground that the order of February 18, 1981 had been improvidently entered.

4
The three-judge panel now denies appellant's petition for rehearing and reinstates its majority opinion and dissenting opinion filed herein on August 29, 1980 and reported in 626 F.2d 721.

5
The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*
 The Honorable John R. Bartels, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation