Court Opinion

ID: 3553523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:05:22.394646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:18.430822
License: Public Domain

The findings of fact by the referee were sufficient to support his finding that the defendant was not guilty. Whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant the findings is not before this court, as the evidence has not been transferred.
Relative to the exception of the plaintiff to the denial of his motion that the evidence be reported, the court states in the transferred case that the evidence presented to the referee was not taken by a stenographer, and that it could not be reported; and furthermore that it does not appear that any motion or request for the finding of any fact was made by the plaintiff at the trial. The latter fact, as stated by the court, warrants the ruling made by the court. Moynihan v. Brennan, 77 N.H. 273, 274; Carpenter v. Carpenter, 78 N.H. 440, 444; Barker v. Company, 78 N.H. 571,572.
The motions of the plaintiff for a trial of the case by the court, and that the case should be recommitted to the referee to hear further evidence, were solely for the determination of the trial court, and their denial raises no question of law. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N.H. 413, 417, and cases there cited; Manchester Amusement Co. v. Conn, 80 N.H. 455.
The findings of the referee are adequate to support a verdict and judgment for the defendant. As the evidence was not transferred, the exception to the judgment presents no question for this court.
Exceptions overruled.
All concurred. *Page 405