Court Opinion

ID: 1014437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:16:30.070738+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:28.673411
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 04-1552

CURLEE SHERMAN,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

GREENPOINT CREDIT,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.    Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-1036-5)

Submitted:   August 25, 2004            Decided:   September 20, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

              Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment

adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint

pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order.              We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.               Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.             See Sherman

v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004,

entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts   and    legal   contentions   are     adequately   presented    in   the

materials     before   the   court   and     argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                     - 2 -