Court Opinion

ID: 994912
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:29:48.523702+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:38.572073
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

SANTIAGO GONZALES,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-91-59-R-H, CA-97-113-R)

Submitted:   April 16, 1998                  Decided:   May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Santiago Gonzales, Appellant Pro Se.      Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia;
Robert Paul Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Gonzales, Nos. CR-91-59-R-H; CA-
97-113-R (W.D. VA. Jan. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2