Court Opinion

ID: 2814371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-07-02 22:09:37.148741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:18:27.146582
License: Public Domain

Filed 7/1/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 164

State of North Dakota, 		Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Douglas Gary Feist, 		Defendant and Appellant

No. 20150041

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, The Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Britta Demello Rice, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.

Michael R. Hoffman, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, ND 58502-1056, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Feist

No. 20150041

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	Douglas Gary Feist appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury conviction of criminal mischief and from a district court order granting the State’s motion in limine to limit evidence of restitution.  Feist argues the district court erred by granting the State’s motion in limine. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion.

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom