Court Opinion

ID: 9895137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-04 21:00:34.729259+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:28.764023
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6760      Doc: 9         Filed: 11/03/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-6760

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      v.

        JARVARIS ANTWAN ANDREWS,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

                                               No. 23-6761

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

                      v.

        JARVARIS ANTOINE ANDREWS,

                             Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
        Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00144-CCE-1;
        1:20-cr-00133-CCE-1)

        Submitted: October 31, 2023                                  Decided: November 3, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6760      Doc: 9        Filed: 11/03/2023     Pg: 2 of 3

        Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jarvaris Antwan Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6760      Doc: 9         Filed: 11/03/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Jarvaris Antwan Andrews appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for reduction of sentence. After review of the record, we conclude

        that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that such relief was not

        warranted in light of relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors after balancing those factors

        against Andrews’ arguments. See United States v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826, 831, 834 (4th Cir.

        2022) (noting standard of review, conclusions district court must draw to grant motion, and

        guideposts for determining whether court has abused its discretion in considering 18 U.S.C.

        § 3553(a) factors). Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. United States v. Andrews,

        Nos.   1:08-cr-00144-CCE-1;      1:20-cr-00133-CCE-1      (M.D.N.C.     July   11,   2023).

        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                     3