Court Opinion

ID: 3922222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:49:07.672857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:53.325584
License: Public Domain

Appellee sued appellant upon a promissory note. By cross-action, appellant set up a counterclaim arising out of a breach of contract. It was alleged by McKinney that he had performed certain services for appellee and incurred certain expenses in the performance thereof; that appellee had agreed to pay the reasonable value of his time in the performance of said services and the expenses which he had incurred. The value of his time and the amount of expenses incurred were alleged.
An exception to the counterclaim was sustained upon the ground that the items thereof were unliquidated demands, and could not be set off against the plaintiff's demand. The items claimed in set-off were not unliquidated. McCarty v. Squyres, 34 S.W. 356; De June v. Brubaker,5 Tex. Civ. App. 79, 24 S.W. 79; Bank v. Lynch, 6 Tex. Civ. App. 590,25 S.W. 1042; Snelling v. Koerner, 27 S.W. 887.
The court erred in sustaining the exception. Reversed and remanded.