Court Opinion

ID: 9953886
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-23 00:00:36.998196+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:08:40.546897
License: Public Domain

Case: 24-40013           Document: 69-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 03/22/2024

          United States Court of Appeals
               for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                  ____________                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                                         FILED
                                   No. 24-40013                                    March 22, 2024
                                 Summary Calendar                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                                 ____________                                            Clerk

United States of America,

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                         versus

James David Reeves,

                                           Defendant—Appellant.
                  ______________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 4:20-CR-382-107
                  ______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
      Defendant-Appellant James David Reeves appeals the order of
detention entered by a magistrate judge after revoking pretrial release. In
general, “appellate courts are without jurisdiction to hear appeals directly
from federal magistrates.” United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th
Cir. 1980). A person ordered detained by a magistrate judge may seek review

      _____________________
      *
          This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-40013        Document: 69-1       Page: 2    Date Filed: 03/22/2024

                                 No. 24-40013

by the district court. 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b). It is not within our jurisdiction to
undertake such review in the first place. 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also United
States v. Gage, No. 93-2125, 1993 WL 117780, at *1 (5th Cir. Mar. 22, 1993)
(unpublished); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3. This appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

                                       2