Court Opinion

ID: 2121772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:22:57.659708+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:27.010414
License: Public Domain

37 Mich. App. 280 (1971)
194 N.W.2d 488
PEOPLE
v.
BANKS
Docket No. 11250.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided November 29, 1971.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Thomas G. Plunkett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Dennis Donohue, Chief Appellate Counsel, for the people.
Condit, Denison, Devine, Porter & Bartush, for defendant on appeal.
*281 Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and FITZGERALD and QUINN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was first tried and convicted by a jury of first-degree murder[1] on January 10, 1952. Because of error in the court's instructions and in the form of the jury's verdict, defendant's motion for new trial was granted. Defendant was retried on the same charge and once again convicted. Defendant's motion for directed verdict at the close of the proofs was denied. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment on April 5, 1955.
Defendant's delayed motion for new trial was denied in Oakland County Circuit Court on January 12, 1971. From the denial of the motion for new trial, defendant made application in this Court for a delayed appeal. That application was granted on May 12, 1971.
Defendant's brief sets out the facts which led to defendant's conviction by carefully and accurately summarizing the testimony heard at trial. The people have accepted defendant's statement of facts. We do not reach the issue raised by defendant on appeal for the reason that in order to support a conviction for first-degree murder, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was premeditation and deliberation and such a lapse of time as would give the mind time to calculate the purpose and intent of the killing. People v. Case, 7 Mich App 217 (1967); People v. Bergin, 16 Mich App 443 (1969). The prosecution introduced no evidence to support such a finding by the jury. Thus, the trial court should have granted defendant's motion for directed verdict at least with regard to the charge of first-degree murder. In regard to first-degree *282 murder, the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence since no evidence introduced at trial fairly supports an inference of premeditation and deliberation.
Under GCR 1963, 820.1, this Court, in its discretion, may "give any judgment and make any order which ought to have been given or made, and make such other and further orders and grant such relief, as the case may require". Thus, this Court will grant the defendant's motion for directed verdict at least on the charge of first-degree murder and reverse defendant's conviction and remand it for a new trial. In such case, double jeopardy will attach and defendant cannot be retried on the charge of first-degree murder.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
NOTES
[1]  MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548.