Court Opinion

ID: 994041
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:17:04.642209+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:12.618771
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7328

WILBERT MAYLE,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-94-146-2)

Submitted:   January 13, 1998             Decided:   January 30, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Mayle, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Egnatoff, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap-

peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Mayle v. West Virginia, No. CA-94-146-2 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 2, 1996).
See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23,
1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2