Court Opinion

ID: 9400612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-08 17:04:06.790095+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:46.812378
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11256    Document: 19-1    Date Filed: 06/08/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-11256
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
                                                    Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
       versus
       DEAN LACORTE,
       owner, beachside storage and oﬃce park,
       TY BERDEAUX,
       court operations manager,
       MATTHEW PATTERSON,
       deputy clerk,
       SCOTT ELLIS,
       brevard county clerk of court, retired,
       ROBERT BLAISE TRETTIS,
       public defender,
USCA11 Case: 23-11256      Document: 19-1      Date Filed: 06/08/2023     Page: 2 of 3

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-11256

       et al.,

                                                      Defendants-Appellees.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01747-RBD-DCI
                           ____________________

       Before WILSON, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to ﬁle a no-
       tice of appeal on or before May 31, 2022, which was the next busi-
       ness day after 30 days following the date judgment was deemed
       entered on the district court’s November 29, 2021 dismissal order.
       28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A),
       (7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, Lindberg did not ﬁle a notice of ap-
       peal until April 8, 2023.
              Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
       Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
       ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
       pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
       1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
USCA11 Case: 23-11256     Document: 19-1      Date Filed: 06/08/2023    Page: 3 of 3

       23-11256               Opinion of the Court                        3

       appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
       entertain an appeal that is out of time).
             All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
       hearing may be ﬁled unless it complies with the timing and other
       requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.