Court Opinion

ID: 808926
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-09-20 19:54:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:27.736236
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             SEP 20 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-10581

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:11-cr-50074-FJM

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
HEIDI WELCH,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                   Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before:        WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

       Heidi Welch appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the five-

month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Welch’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Welch with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      Counsel’s motion requesting a ruling from the court on her motion to

withdraw is denied as moot.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                  11-10581