Court Opinion

ID: 9772481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 17:19:26.906646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:31:44.818566
License: Public Domain

Judge BIRD
concurs, but is of the opinion that the liability of the railroad should rest upon the basis that the evidence would *455warrant a finding that the place where the boy was injured had become by usage a public crossing, so as to impose upon the railroad a duty of lookout and warning as to any person using the crossing, whether child or adult. See Carter v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 150 Ky. 525, 150 S.W. 811; Southern R. Co. in Kentucky v. Jones, 172 Ky. 8, 188 S.W. 873; Note, 167 A.L.R. 1257, 1320.