Court Opinion

ID: 9590435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:54:56.856714+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:01.358614
License: Public Domain

Ringold, J.
(concurring in the result) — Without regard *564to whether the trial court's authority to require restitution as a condition of probation derives from the statutes discussed, see State v. Hall, 35 Wn. App. 302, 666 P.2d 930 (1983) (Ringold, J., concurring) and State v. Mark, 36 Wn. App. 428, 675 P.2d 1250 (1984) (Ringold, J., addendum), I concur in the result. The trial court properly exercised its discretion.
Review denied by Supreme Court April 6, 1984.