Court Opinion

ID: 9382566
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-28 09:07:50.211537+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:40.254889
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-23-00093-CR

                               Ex parte Rodrick Lavaur Griffin

                  FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
             NO. 81528, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Rodrick Lavaur Griffin, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

filed a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure that was subsequently denied by the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals (CCA) without written order. See Tex. Code Crim. App. art. 11.07. Griffin, appearing

pro se, now seeks to appeal that denial.

               Article 11.07 provides the exclusive remedy for post-conviction relief from a

felony conviction in which the applicant seeks relief from a judgment imposing a penalty other

than death. See id. The article vests complete jurisdiction over such relief with the CCA. See

id., at §§ 3, 5. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to

proceedings under article 11.07, including appellate review of applications denied by the CCA.

See In re Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, no pet.) (“Courts of

appeals have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to proceedings under article

11.07.”); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196–97 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig.
proceeding) (observing intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction over “post-conviction

writs of habeas corpus in felony cases” under article 11.07); see also Ex parte Taylor,

No. 03-16-00461-CR, 2016 WL 6407301, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 28, 2016, no pet.)

(mem. op., not designated for publication) (noting that this Court “do[es] not have jurisdiction to

review the Court of Criminal Appeals’s denial of [appellant’s] application for writ of habeas

corpus”).     This appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.     See Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

                                             __________________________________________
                                             Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 24, 2023

Do Not Publish

                                                2