Court Opinion

ID: 1020714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:55:34.42023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:49.659413
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinstate the appeal period. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Rudd,
  
  No. 7:97-er00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 & filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.