Court Opinion

ID: 6911443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 22:23:42.120596+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:31.395840
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 In this appeal we are asked to re-examine our decision in State v. Carlton, 1963, 233 Or 296, 378 P2d *602557, in respect to a thief being charged with receiving and concealing stolen property. We decline to do so. In this case the indictment was charged in the conjunctive. “Proof of any one of the acts charged was sufficient to make out the offense.” State v. Soasey, 1964, 237 Or 167, 171, 390 P2d 190, 192. There was such proof in the case.
Judgment affirmed.