Court Opinion

ID: 9827005
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 17:03:17.49733+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:16:37.873513
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In our opinion heretofore filed, after setting out the first and third paragraphs of the court’s charge, which are complained of by appellant in his first, second, third, and *372fourth assignments of error, we say: “The portions of the charge complained of are not abstractly inaccurate, but whether proper to be given in this case depends upon the facts, which we will now undertake to briefly review in the light most favorable to the verdict, and if the evidence, so viewed, justifies the charge, then the assignments cannot be sustained.” We think the expression “in the light most favorable to the verdict, and if the evidence so viewed justified the charge,” etc., is inapt, and is hereby withdrawn. We think that the evidence which we believe is fairly reflected in the statement thereof set out in the opinion, when viewed in any aspect, warranted the giving of the charge complained of.
We have carefully examined appellant’s motion for a rehearing, and are of the opinion that the same should be overruled, and it has been so ordered.