Court Opinion

ID: 3764368
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:19:29.338634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:38.458396
License: Public Domain

{¶ 54} I concur in the foregoing opinion, however I write separately only regarding the sixth assignment of error. Since Dickinson is appealing his sentence pursuant to R.C. 2929.12, I would follow the plurality opinion set forth in Kalish, supra. The plurality opinion establishes the appropriate standard of review for appeals of R.C. 2929.12 as an abuse of discretion. Thus, I would use an abuse of discretion standard of review. However, even using an abuse of discretion standard, the outcome would be the same. For this reason, I concur separately as to the sixth assignment of error and fully in the judgment. *Page 1