Court Opinion

ID: 2890844
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 21:04:59.57615+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:54.924245
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-04-0067-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

MARCH 23, 2004

______________________________

ZELLA WADE, APPELLANT

V.

DEERE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. 01-09-18,552; HONORABLE HAROLD PHELAN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.
(footnote: 1)
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Zella Wade filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment. Notwithstanding the trial court’s announcement that it intended to grant a new trial, appellee Deere Credit Services, Inc. also filed a notice of appeal prior to the deadline out of an abundance of caution.  Pending before this Court is Deere Credit’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal following the trial court’s corrected order granting a new trial on liability and damage claims in Wade’s breach of contract action.  We grant the motion.

The legal effect of an order granting a new trial vacates the original judgment and returns the case to the trial court as if no previous trial had been conducted.  Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Scott, 846 S.W.3d 832, 833 (Tex. 1993); 
see also
 Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Long John Silver’s, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1993, writ dism’d w.o.j.).  Thus, there is no final judgment from which an appeal may be prosecuted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis

    Justice

 

FOOTNOTES
1:John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.