Court Opinion

ID: 9833481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:45:10.556218+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:03.354530
License: Public Domain

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
This is a local option case. The issue of selling is fairly presented by the State, and gift by the *410appellant. These issues were properly submitted 'in the charge. A bill of exceptions was presented to the court to some of his rulings in regard to the admission of testimony. This was refused by the court. He states: “In fact every objection raised on this phase of the case by defendant was sustained, and the revenue license, which was admitted without objection by defendant was afterward excluded from the consideration of the jury on motion of defendant. Defendant himself volunteered to get the license himself. Because there were no exceptions, I can not prepare a bill.” As this matter is presented, there is no bill of exceptions. The court declined to approve the bill as well as to prepare one. Appellant’s counsel accepted the record in this condition and this court must so treat it.
The motion for new trial criticises the rulings of the court in regard to the admission and rejection of testimony, but inasmuch as a bill of exceptions was not reserved, these matters will not be reviewed. We are of opinion that the charge of the court sufficiently presented’ the issues to the jury.
There being no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ramsey, Judge, absent.