Court Opinion

ID: 4703068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-13 11:16:18.180848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:28.953049
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                  San Antonio, Texas
                                          July 6, 2021

                                      No. 04-21-00182-CR

                                    Casey Ray ESCOBAR,
                                          Appellant

                                                v.

                                   THE STATE OF TEXAS,
                                         Appellee

                  From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                Trial Court No. 2019CR6126
                         Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER

        On June 3, 2019, Appellant Casey Ray Escobar was charged with possession of heroin as
a habitual offender in trial court cause number 2019CR6126. On January 24, 2020, the District
Attorney moved to dismiss cause number 2019CR6126 based on the punishment for trial court
cause number 2020CR0229. The trial court signed the dismissal order for 2019CR6126 on the
same day. On May 7, 2021, Appellant Escobar submitted a notice of appeal for trial court cause
number 2019CR6126.
        A defendant has the right of appeal only following the imposition or suspension of a
sentence or following an appealable order. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.2(a); Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (iterating that a
defendant’s appeal must be authorized by law). Several cases have concluded that a dismissal is
not an appealable order. Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.)
(citing United States v. Day, 806 F.2d 1240, 1242 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Martin, 682
F.2d 506, 507 (5th Cir. 1982); United States v. Arzate, 545 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1977)); Folkes v.
State, No. 01-17-00549-CR, 2018 WL 326428, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 9,
2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Furthermore, a trial court must certify
a defendant’s right to appeal if he has the right to appeal, which has not occurred in this case.
Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
         Even if the dismissal were appealable, “[a] timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke
a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
(citing Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)). In this case, the notice of
appeal was filed a year after the trial court’s dismissal. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a).
         Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within ten days of the
date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If Appellant
fails to show cause within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.
43.2(f).
       All other appellate deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of this court.

                                                      _________________________________
                                                      Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 6th day of July, 2021.

                                                      ___________________________________
                                                      MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court