Court Opinion

ID: 4733441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:57:41.544457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:08:09.438298
License: Public Domain

Stiles, J.
(concurring). — Eor the reasons given by me in Pullman v. Hungate, I should dissent in this case. But I am very much in doubt whether the act of 1888 (Laws, p. 221) was void as to this corporation, which had a valid, legal existence as a corporation by special act, and merely undertook to re-incorporate under the law *660of 1888. See §26, p. 231, and Burlington v. Leebrich, 43 Iowa, 252, and I shall therefore concur in the result.
Anders, J. — I concur in the above.