Court Opinion

ID: 9896517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-13 16:02:01.949844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:06.720517
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11169    Document: 42-1     Date Filed: 11/13/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11169
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       SAMUEL MALDONADO,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00179-TJC-PDB-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11169      Document: 42-1     Date Filed: 11/13/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-11169

       Before LUCK, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Christopher Eric Roper, appointed counsel for Samuel Mal-
       donado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
       further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Maldonado’s conviction
       and sentence are AFFIRMED.