Court Opinion

ID: 992904
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:59:29.425487+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:44.023829
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6605

ROBERT V. FUNK,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. M. VANYUR, Warden; JAMES GILMORE, Attorney
General of the Commonwealth of Virginia,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
(CA-97-24-5-BR)

Submitted:   August 14, 1997              Decided:   August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert V. Funk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funk
v. Vanyur, No. CA-97-24-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 1997). We deny Ap-

pellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2