Court Opinion

ID: 6123131
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-04 20:10:54.935775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:17.968920
License: Public Domain

Ingalls, J.:
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover for services rendered by himself and his assignors, as laborers of the “New York Republican Newspaper Association,” against the defendants as the stockholders of such corporation. It was established upon the trial that the services were rendered as claimed. That the above-named association was duly incorporated under the Laws of 1848, chapter 40.
The referee decided the case upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove that the defendants, or either of them, were *493stockholders at the time the debts were contracted.. This presents the only question to be considered upon this appeal. The articles of association were put in evidence, by which it appears that the defendants signed and acknowledged them, and were therein named two of the trustees.
The referee in his report, finds as follows: “ Ninth, that the plaintiff has failed to prove that the above-named defendants, Wesley and Platt, or either of them, were stockholders in the “New York Republican Newspaper Association” at the time the debts were contracted, upon which this action is brought. The eighteenth section of said act of 1848 provides, “ the stockholders of any company organized under the provisions of this act shall be jointly and severally, individually liable for all debts that may be due and owing to all their laborers, servants, and apprentices, for services performed for such corporation.” The third section of the same act provides: “ The stock, property and concerns of such company shall be managed by not less than three, nor more than nine trustees who shall be stockholders m such conypamyP The articles of association furnish, at least, prima facie evidence that the defendants were stockholders at the time the company was organized. They are, in law, presumed to have understood the relation which they bore to the corporation, which they were instrumental in creating. To be trustees they were required to be stockholders, and in that capacity they presented themselves to the public, and should not be allowed to deny that relation to the corporation against persons who have rendered services as laborers for such association, upon facts such as were established upon the trial.
Having been thus shown to be stockholders at the time the corporation was formed, they will be presumed to continue such until the contrary shall be established. (Strong v. Wheaton, 38 Barb., 617, 622 ; 1 Greenleaf on Ev., 3d p., 106, § 41.)
The mere fact that the book offered showed that Wesley had resigned as trustee, did not destroy the presumption that he was a stockholder, which he might well continue to be, although not a trustee ; for while he could not, legally, be a trustee without being a stockholder, he might very consistently be a stockholder and not a trustee. The twenty-fifth section of the act provides for keeping *494a book to contain tbe names of tbe stockholders, and declares that “such book shall be presumptive evidence of the facts therein stated in favor of the plaintiff in any suit against any stockholder.” The statute does not declare that it shall be the only evidence, or even the best evidence. This provision of the statute cannot properly be held to exclude the evidence offered at the trial.
The complaint should not have been dismissed by the referee upon the facts proved by the plaintiff.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs to abide the event.
Davis, P. J., and Beady, J., concurred.
Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.