Court Opinion

ID: 9324951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-13 19:00:23.482808+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:58.488563
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10292         Document: 00516575827             Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/13/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10292
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                                                               December 13, 2022
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Armando Gonzales,

                                                                   Defendant—Appellant.

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:21-CR-271-2

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Armando Gonzales has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Gonzales has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10292     Document: 00516575827          Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/13/2022

                                   No. 22-10292

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2