Court Opinion

ID: 2683595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-07-15 05:01:02.461215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:32.743595
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-41189      Document: 00512693369         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/10/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                    No. 13-41189                             July 10, 2014
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ACENSION GARCIA-LOPEZ,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:13-CR-1022-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Acension Garcia-

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-41189    Document: 00512693369     Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/10/2014

                                 No. 13-41189

Lopez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2