Court Opinion

ID: 9895152
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-04 21:00:46.634589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:19.428145
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1933      Doc: 10         Filed: 11/03/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1933

        In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS,

                            Petitioner.

        On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
        District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:23-ct-03092-M-RJ)

        Submitted: September 21, 2023                                Decided: November 3, 2023

        Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1933      Doc: 10          Filed: 11/03/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Victor Bernard Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

        court has unduly delayed in ruling on his civil rights complaint. He seeks an order from

        this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay

        in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We also deny Perkins’

        motion for an interlocutory judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

        and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                PETITION DENIED

                                                      2