Court Opinion

ID: 221320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-07-20 00:02:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:04.509428
License: Public Domain

NOTE:   This order is nonprecedential.

  Wniteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppenl~
      for tbe jfebernl (!Circuit

        INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
               Plaintiff-Appellant,

                            v.
                     PALM, INC.,
                   Defendant-Appellee.

                        2011-1296

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in case no. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.

                      ON MOTION

                       ORDER

    Palm, Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until
August 4, 2011, to file its answering brief and Intermec
Technologies Corp. moves for a 28-day extension of time,
to file its reply brief after the date of service of Palm,
Inc.' s brief.

    Upon consideration thereof,
INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES v. PALM INC                               2

      IT Is ORDERED THAT:

      The motion is granted.

                                    FOR THE COURT

      JUL 1 9 2011                   /s/ Jan Horbaly
         Date                       Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk
cc: Carson P. Veach, Esq.
    Robert T. Haslam, Esq.
                                                 FILED
s21                                     u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
                                          THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

                                             JUL 1 920\1
                                               JAN.HORBAlY
                                                  CLERK