Court Opinion

ID: 1005420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:56:17.522669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:34.449770
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6793

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

NAPOLEON GOODSON, IV,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.   Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CR-93-471, CA-00-1517-3-19)

Submitted:   September 20, 2001       Decided:   September 26, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Napoleon Goodson, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Napoleon Goodson, IV, seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   United States v. Goodson, Nos. CR-93-471; CA-00-1517-3-19

(D.S.C. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 3, 2001 and Apr. 4,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2