Court Opinion

ID: 9534841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:43:05.990871+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:46.711966
License: Public Domain

JOHNSON, Judge:
special concurrence.
I concur in the result of the majority opinion herein as it relates to this case but need to point out as to Proposition I, I concur based upon stare decisis. So that my position is clear, I again refer to my concurring in the result opinion in Hardiman v. State, 798 P.2d 222 (Okl.Cr.1990) and I would limit the admissibility of evidence of prior conviction only as to the number of prior convictions where there is a similarity between the past crime and charged crime. As to other prior crimes for impeachment purposes, no limitation should be placed upon same. Again, my position is clearly written in Hardiman.