Court Opinion

ID: 9554660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-09 18:01:44.986415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:36:05.108747
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10572    Document: 53-1     Date Filed: 08/09/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10572
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       RASHEEM LUCKY SHOSHO SA ATIS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-00001-AW-GRJ-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10572     Document: 53-1     Date Filed: 08/09/2023   Page: 2 of 3

       2                     Opinion of the Court                22-10572

                           ____________________

                                 No. 22-10618
                           ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                       Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       PIERRE RINALDI LALEAU,

                                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-00001-AW-GRJ-2
                          ____________________

       Before JORDAN, LAGOA, and ED CARNES, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Following their convictions for conspiracy to defraud, pos-
       session of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, and identity
       theft, Rasheem Atis and Pierre Laleau challenge the denial of their
       motions to suppress. Following oral argument and a review of the
       record, we aﬃrm for the oral and written reasons provided by the
USCA11 Case: 22-10572      Document: 53-1     Date Filed: 08/09/2023     Page: 3 of 3

       22-10572               Opinion of the Court                         3

       district court. See, e.g., D.E. 39 at 1–2; D.E. 42 at 1–4; D.E. 112 at
       184–191.
              AFFIRMED.