Court Opinion

ID: 1029183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:53:11.416185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:42.733088
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  John Sterling Pettengill appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Pettengill v. City of Richwood’s Fed. Sewer Project,
  
  No. 2:07-cv-00290 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.