Court Opinion

ID: 3546883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:57:14.760395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:40:44.380389
License: Public Domain

REQUESTED BY: Senator David Landis Nebraska State Legislature State Capitol Lincoln, Nebraska 68509
Dear Senator:
This is in response to your letter of March 16, 1985, concerning the constitutionality of your subcommittee's proposed amendment to LB 271. Specifically, you ask for our opinion on section 13 of the amendment which provides as follows:
   If the total value of agricultural and horticultural land in any county decreases, as a result of implementation of a new agricultural land valuation manual, by more than ten per cent in any one taxable year, the county shall be required to implement a ten per cent decrease each year until the full amount of the decrease is reflected in the values of agricultural land. This section shall apply for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1987.
The result of this proposal would mean that such property would be subject to a tax levy in a year in which its total value had been decreased by more than ten percent without a true determination of its actual value for that year. It was this same result which led the court to conclude that the former biennial valuation statute, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 77-1301(1) (Reissue 1981) was unconstitutional and a violation of the Nebraska Constitution, ArticleVIII, Section 1, in Xerox Corp. v. Karnes, 217 Neb. 728 at 733, ___ N.W.2d ___, (1984). This provision of your proposed amendment would be subject to the same challenge and the result would undoubtedly be the same.
Sincerely,
ROBERT M. SPIRE Attorney General
John Boehm Assistant Attorney General