Court Opinion

ID: 3206019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-23 22:07:50.153088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:59.719890
License: Public Domain

J-S24004-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA              :      IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                          :            PENNSYLVANIA
            v.                            :
                                          :
ANDREW CHEWEY, IV,                        :
                                          :
                  Appellant               :           No. 700 MDA 2015

           Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence March 9, 2015
             in the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County,
            Criminal Division, No(s): CP-40-CR-0001506-2014;
           CP-40-CR-0001508-2014; CP-40-CR-0001672-2013;
           CP-40-CR-0003298-2013; CP-40-CR-0003572-2013;
           CP-40-CR-0003607-2013; CP-40-CR-0003669-2013;
           CP-40-CR-0003900-2013; CP-40-CR-0003901-2013;
            CP-40-CR-0003902-2013 CP-40-CR-0003903-2013

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., BOWES and MUSMANNO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY MUSMANNO, J.:                            FILED MAY 23, 2016

      Andrew Chewey, IV (“Chewey”), appeals from the judgment of

sentence entered following his guilty plea to three counts of theft from a

motor vehicle, two counts each of receiving stolen property (theft of a motor

vehicle), criminal trespass, theft by unlawful taking, burglary and criminal

attempt (burglary), and one count each of theft by unlawful taking and

possession of drug paraphernalia.1 We affirm.

      On January 8, 2015, Chewey entered a guilty plea to the above-

referenced charges. On March 9, 2015, the trial court sentenced Chewey to

an aggregate prison term of six to twelve years. The trial court directed that

1
  18 Pa.C.S.A. §§    3903, 3925 , 3503, 3921, 3502, 901, 3921; 35 P.S.
§ 780-113(a)(32).
J-S24004-16

the sentence was to be served concurrent with a sentence that Chewey was

then serving in Wyoming County on unrelated charges.           The trial court

credited Chewey with time served from September 20, 2013 (the date of his

arrest in the above-captioned matter), to March 12, 2014 (the date on which

Chewey was sentenced in the Wyoming County matter).                 Thereafter,

Chewey timely filed a Notice of Appeal, and a court-ordered Pa.R.A.P.

1925(b) Concise Statement of matters complained of on appeal.

      Chewey now presents the following claim for our review:        “Whether

the trial court imposed an illegal sentence by failing to give [] Chewey credit

for all time served in the Luzerne County Correctional Facility prior to

sentencing?”   Brief for Appellant at 1.     Citing 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9670(4),

Chewey argues that the trial court can award credit on multiple offenses if

the trial court makes the sentence concurrent.” Brief for Appellant at 5.

      Chewey challenges the legality of his sentence. See Commonwealth

v. Tobin, 89 A.3d 663, 669 (Pa. Super. 2014) (recognizing a claim based

upon the failure to give credit for time served as a challenge to the legality

of a sentence). Sentencing credit for time served is provided for pursuant to

42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9760, which states, in pertinent part, as follows:

      (1) Credit against the maximum term and any minimum
      term shall be given to the defendant for all time spent in custody
      as a result of the criminal charge for which a prison sentence is
      imposed or as a result of the conduct on which such a charge is
      based. Credit shall include credit for time spent in custody prior
      to trial, during trial, pending sentence, and pending the
      resolution of an appeal.

                                  -2-
J-S24004-16

42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9760(1) (emphasis added).        “This Court has held that a

defendant is not entitled to ‘receiv[e] credit against more than one sentence

for the same time served.’” Commonwealth v. Ellsworth, 97 A.3d 1255,

1257 (Pa. Super. 2014) (quoting Commonwealth v. Merigis, 681 A.2d
194, 195 (Pa. Super. 1994)).

      The trial court addressed Chewey’s claim as follows:

             The law with regard to sentencing credit in the instance of
      unrelated offenses is well established. Specifically, “a defendant
      shall be given credit for any days spent in custody prior to the
      imposition of sentence, but only if such commitment is on the
      offense for which sentence is imposed.” See Commonwealth
      v. Clark, 885 A.2d 1030, 1034 (Pa. Super. 2005). “Credit is not
      given, however, for a commitment by reason of a separate and
      distinct offense.”   See Commonwealth v. Miller, 444 Pa.
      Super. 380, 655 A.2d 1000, 1002 (1995). [Chewey] is not
      entitled to a sentencing credit for time served between March
      12, 2014 and March 9, 2015[,] because during that time[,
      Chewey] was serving a sentence on a separate and distinct
      offense imposed by Wyoming County. [See] id.

Trial Court Opinion, 8/5/15, at 3 (unnumbered). We agree with the sound

reasoning of the trial court, as set forth above, and affirm on this basis. See

id.

      Judgment of sentence affirmed.

      Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary

Date: 5/23/2016

                                  -3-