Court Opinion

ID: 9893831
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-30 18:00:54.449169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:42.154493
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40225        Document: 00516948349             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/30/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 23-40225
                                                                              FILED
                                                                       October 30, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Hubert Palacios Caicedo,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Eastern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:18-CR-71-3
                     ______________________________

   Before Jolly, Engelhardt, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         The attorney appointed to represent Hubert Palacios Caicedo has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Caicedo has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40225    Document: 00516948349         Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/30/2023

                                 No. 23-40225

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2