Court Opinion

ID: 1022190
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:18:34.43373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:42.646459
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Angelo Sherman appeals the district court’s oral order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35 motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
  
   See
  
  Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We therefore affirm the denial of relief on that ground. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.