Court Opinion

ID: 9407066
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-05 19:09:20.060456+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:35.122821
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                    NO.    2023        KW   0336

VERSUS

JAVON       BATISTE                                                                                  JULY       5,     2023

In    Re:             Javon     Batiste,       applying                 for      supervisory                writs,           18th
                      Judicial          District Court,                 Parish       of        Pointe       Coupee,          No.
                      83125.

BEFORE:               LANIER,        HESTER,       AND MILLER,             JJ.

        WRIT          DENIED       ON   THE       SHOWING         MADE.     Relator            sought           supervisory
review           of     the        district            court'      sruling   on  the   Motion  for
Discovery,              however,            relator           failed   to  include   the  district
court'      s    ruling,        the      State' s       response,           if any,            pertinent             district
court       minutes,           the       bill      of    information,                the        commitment             order,

and    any       other     portion          of     the       district          court'     s     record          that       might
support          the     claims          raised         in    the       writ     application.                   Therefore,
this       court       cannot        adequately              review       the    ruling          at    issue          herein.
Supplementation                 of      this      writ       application             and/ or          an    application
for  rehearing  will                     not      be     considered.                 See        Uniform              Rules    of

Louisiana  Courts of                     Appeal,         Rules          2- 18. 7 &        4-    9.         In    the       event

relator          elects       to     file     a   new    application with                      this    court,          he may
do    so        without        the   necessity               of                       a                     date.
                                                             obtaining                         return                        Any
future          filing     on      this issue            should include                   the        entire          contents

of    this       application,
                                          the      missing             items     noted         above,           and    a    copy
of this ruling.

                                                         WIL

                                                             CHH
                                                             SMM

COURT       OF APPEAL,          FIRST       CIRCUIT

             PUTY      CLERK OF COURT
                   FOR    THE      COURT