Court Opinion

ID: 9365099
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-21 18:18:14.875913+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:43.242563
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-23-00017-CV

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

JEFFREY RAY VAUGHAN,                                                     Appellant,

                                             v.

RAUL MEDINA, PIERRE NEWKIRK,
AND LAW OFFICE OF RAUL
MEDINA, P.C.,                                                           Appellees.

                  On appeal from the 430th District Court
                        of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                                     ORDER

    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva
                          Order Per Curiam

      On January 13, 2023, appellant Jeffrey Ray Vaughan filed an emergency motion

for stay pending appeal pursuant to Rule 10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 10. This Court requested appellees, Raul Medina, Pierre

Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C., to file a response to this motion on or
before 3:00 p.m. on Monday, January 16, 2023. The Court has now received and

reviewed appellees’ response.

      The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for stay

and the response filed by appellees, is of the opinion that the appellant’s emergency

motion for stay should be denied. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s emergency motion for

stay pending appeal.

                                                            PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the
17th day of January, 2023.

                                          2