Court Opinion

ID: 9929922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-05 19:01:06.606317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:01:17.098875
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10729         Document: 00517055241             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/05/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                      ____________                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                                        FILED
                                       No. 23-10729                               February 5, 2024
                                     Summary Calendar
                                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                     ____________                                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Nathan Barrientez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:22-CR-98-2
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Nathan Barrientez has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Barrientez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
   the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10729    Document: 00517055241         Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/05/2024

                                 No. 23-10729

   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2