Court Opinion

ID: 4570219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-28 13:01:51.809283+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:56.052839
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 17-1293V
                                        (not to be published)

    MARC BARNET,
                                                                Chief Special Master Corcoran
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: August 26, 2020

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit                 (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Attorney’s Fees and Costs

                         Respondent.

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1

      On September 20, 2017, Marc Barnet filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome as a result of
a November 1, 2016 influenza vaccination. (Petition at 1-2). On May 19, 2020, a decision
was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF
No. 72).

1
   Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.
2
  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
       Petitioner filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated June 29, 2020 (ECF
No. 77), requesting a total award of $59,669.83 (representing $58,241.30 in fees and
$1,428.53 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 Petitioner filed a signed
statement indicating that he incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 77-3).
Respondent reacted to the motion on June 29, 2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the
statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and
defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 78).
On June 30, 2020, Petitioner filed a reply requesting the attorney’s fees and costs be
awarded in full. (ECF No. 79).

       On August 7, 2020, I issued a decision granting Petitioner’s motion and awarding
the requested fees and costs (ECF No. 80). On the same day, judgment was entered
(ECF No. 82).

       On August 12, 2020, Petitioner filed a Motion to Amend Judgment pursuant to
RCFC 60(a) and Vaccine Rule 36(b) (ECF No. 83). Petitioner asserted that the costs
awarded in the August 7, 2020 judgment included $400.00 paid to the Internal Revenue
Service for copies of Petitioner’s full tax returns, but that Petitioner had received a refund
of that $400.00 cost. Id. at 1. Therefore, Petitioner moved for an amended judgment in
the amount of $59,269.83. Id. at 2. Petitioner stated that Respondent did not oppose the
motion. Id.

       On August 14, 2020, I granted the motion to amend judgment and directed the
clerk to withdraw the August 7, 2020 fee decision and vacate the August 7, 2020 fee
judgment (ECF No. 84). On August 14, 2020, the clerk withdrew the fee decision and
vacated the fee judgment.

       I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
hours or rates. The only reduction taken is the $400.00 reduction in costs requested by
Petitioner in the August 12, 2020 motion to amend the judgment.

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs.
I award a total of $59,269.83 (representing $58,241.30 in fees and $1,028.53 in costs) as
a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel.3

3
 Petitioner requests check be forwarded to Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, 1605 Main Street, Suite 710,
Sarasota Florida, 34236.

                                                   2
In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                      Brian H. Corcoran
                                                      Chief Special Master

4
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice
renouncing their right to seek review.
                                                 3