Court Opinion

ID: 9842793
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 02:18:39.61553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:49.568222
License: Public Domain

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
I concur in the foregoing opinion, with the exception that I believe the judgment should be reversed and there is no need for a remandment. Upon the hearing in the district court both parties had an opportunity to, and did, offer evidence which they considered relevant to all issues presented there and later in this court. There is no occasion now for a further hearing. Both sides have had their day in court.
On Motion to Modify
SWAIM, Circuit Judge.
On consideration of the respondent-appellant’s motion to modify the judgment in this cause and alternative motion for a clarification of the opinion and judgment, and of the petitioner-appellee’s answer thereto,
It Is Ordered By The Court that the last paragraph of the majority opinion in this cause, filed January 13, 1956, be modified as follows:
The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the respondent-appellant.