Court Opinion

ID: 8456155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:57:08.561348+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:04.075261
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory V. Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Spivey, No. 1:12-cv-00029-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 27 & Apr. 15, 2018). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.