Court Opinion

ID: 681950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:39:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:37.909715
License: Public Domain

39 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.James Millard CRAVEN, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6711.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 1994.Decided Oct. 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham.  Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.  (CR-91-229, CA-93-480)
Jack Edmund Carter, Fayetteville, NC, for appellant.
Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Craven, Nos.  CR-91-229;  CA-93-480 (M.D.N.C. June 2, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED