Court Opinion

ID: 9839795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-14 00:00:31.098787+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:33.618596
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10991         Document: 00516894350             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/13/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-10991
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                             September 13, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ronaldo Javier Garcia Rodriguez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-118-4
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Ronaldo Javier Garcia Rodriguez
   has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10991    Document: 00516894350          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/13/2023

                                  No. 22-10991

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2