Court Opinion

ID: 9802756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 14:50:35.696128+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:01:50.512199
License: Public Domain

LUMPKIN, Judge:
concur in results.
4 1 I concur in the decision to reverse the District Court's order granting the motion to suppress and remand the case for further proceedings. However, I find that the defendant's claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that the collective knowledge doctrine cannot apply to the statutory challenge at issue, should be reviewed for plain error only.
T2 To be entitled to relief under the plain error doctrine, Appellant must prove: 1) the existence of an actual error (Me., deviation from a legal rule); 2) that the error is plain or obvious; and 3) that the error affected his substantial rights, meaning the error affected the outcome of the proceeding. Hogan v. State, 2006 OKCR 19, 1 88, 139 P.8d 907, 923; 20 0.8.2011, § 3001.1. If these elements are met, this Court will correct plain error only if the error "seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings" or otherwise represents a "miscarriage of justice." Hogan, 2006 OK CR 19, *271¶ 38, 139 P.3d at 923. Applying this analysis, I find no error and thus no plain error.