Court Opinion

ID: 4819412
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-22 02:44:24.791195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:10:58.845527
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
See Neal v. State, 142 So.3d 883, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming conviction *789and sentence because, despite shortcomings in Anders1 brief, the “court’s independent review of the record and applicable law revealed no reversible error in the circuit court’s proceedings”).
AFFIRMED.
CLARK and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
BENTON, J., Concurs In Result Only.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).