Court Opinion

ID: 7882757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:36:07.908046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:31:39.508556
License: Public Domain

Hall, J.
Where, at the time when a case was tried, the losing party-made a motion for a new trial, which*was approved by the court, subject to future revision, and ordered to be spread upon the minutes, and th8 rule nisi was made returnable to the next term, and where there was not sufficient time during the term to make out and file a brief of the oral and copy of the written testimony, and the court granted an order that defendant have thirty days after the adjournment to file a brief of evidence, subject to the approval of the court and revision of counsel, this did not require the approval of the brief before it was filed, and if it was filed within the time prescribed it was error, on the call of the motion, to dismiss it because the brief of evidence had not. been approved.
Judgment reversed.-