Court Opinion

ID: 8275768
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 02:07:51.15225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:38.545843
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
A careful examination of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that the issues should be again laid before a jury for their determination. The contract alleged by the plaintiff to have been made with the defendant is so much out of the ordinary course of business transactions, when viewed in the light of the surrounding circumstances disclosed by the evidence, as to give it more than a tinge of improbability. The verdict seems to have been given without a careful weighing of the probabilities and reasonable inferences to be drawn from the testimony, and without due regard for the well-known rule of law that the party who holds the affirmative of the issues must bear the burden of proof. We are firmly of the opinion that the interests of justice will be best subserved by ordering a new trial.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.