Court Opinion

ID: 9406578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-01 10:11:48.268899+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:31.502721
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00144-CV

                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

               TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                     TYLER, TEXAS

MICKEY M. HADNOT,                                 §        APPEAL FROM THE 159TH
APPELLANT
                                                  §        DISTRICT COURT
V.
                                                  §        ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS
LUFKIN INDEPENDENT               SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
APPELLEE

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                      PER CURIAM

       This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
       A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--
at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas
Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may
enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an
appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement
of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
       On May 31, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Mickey Hadnot, that the
filing fee in this appeal is due and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not
paid on or before June 12. The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid
the fee or otherwise shown that he is excused from paying the fee.1
         Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).2

Opinion delivered June 30, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

         1 The case information sheet from the Angelina County District Clerk’s office reflects that Appellant was
not declare indigent in the trial court.

         2 We also note that Appellant has not filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Nor

does Appellant’s notice of appeal comply with appellate Rule 9.5 or Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice
and Remedies Code. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a)
(West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s
record).
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                             JUNE 30, 2023

                                         NO. 12-23-00144-CV

                                MICKEY M. HADNOT,
                                     Appellant
                                        V.
                       LUFKIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
                                     Appellee

                                Appeal from the 159th District Court
                     of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-00549-19-09)

       THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

       It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.

                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J