Court Opinion

ID: 2927517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:55:24.080853+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:39.412268
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00596-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
DAVID HAJOVSKY, 	Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF GONZALES,	Appellee. 
_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court 

of Gonzales County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	This case is before the Court on an agreed/joint motion to dismiss appeal.  The
parties have agreed that the trial court's Order Granting Injunction is not a final order, and
therefore, this Court does not have appellate jurisdiction over this case at this time. 
Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to dismiss the appeal.  
 The Court, having considered the documents on file and parties' agreed/joint motion
to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(a).  The parties' agreed/joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having
dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
and our mandate will issue forthwith.

									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 15th day of January, 2009.