Court Opinion

ID: 993798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:13:14.362954+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:17:14.192783
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6842

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

FREDDY PRATS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh.     W. Earl Britt, District
Judge. (CR-82-43-BR, CA-97-148-5-1-BR)

Submitted:   December 11, 1997         Decided:     December 24, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddy Prats, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Prats, Nos. CR-82-43-BR; CA-97-148-5-1-BR
(E.D.N.C. May 28, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to direct the

district court to provide him with trial transcripts. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2