Court Opinion

ID: 9851908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:21:19.586664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:19.296339
License: Public Domain

Chief Justice Bobbitt
concurring.
I concur in the decision and all of the Court’s opinion except the portion thereof which holds that, by reason of the proviso in G.S. 43-10, “the recital of the service of summons and publication in the decree or in the final judgment” shall be “conclusive evidence thereof,” notwithstanding the court file discloses affirmatively that such service was not made. Although I disagree as to this particular point, other grounds set forth in the Court’s opinion amply support the decision.
Justice Sharp joins in this concurring opinion.