Court Opinion

ID: 996235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:48:06.003328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.365236
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-2021

SAM WRIGHT, JR.,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-98-277-A)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Lee Parrish, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil action against the United States. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright

v. United States, No. CA-98-277-A (E.D. Va. May 18, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2