Court Opinion

ID: 9490753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 13:53:35.081575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:54:17.836135
License: Public Domain

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
This ease began as a routine administrative panel matter more than a year ago. I dissented at that time from the grant of the motion to remand because our court was already properly seized of jurisdiction over the ease, and I believed that whatever new matter petitioner wanted to raise should, as a matter of orderly procedure, be raised, if at all, in a new petition in the district court. I remain of that view and believe that the en bane court should have summarily denied the motion to remand. I regard the delay in this case caused by the consideration and disposition of that motion as impossible to justify on any ground.
I therefore respectfully dissent.