Court Opinion

ID: 2926292
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:26:56.981847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:57.888798
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-09-00237-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ, 	Appellant,

v.

DODEKA L. L. C.,	Appellee. 
	____________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on May 25, 2009.  On July 7,
2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.  To date, no response has been
received from appellant.  
	Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 24th day of September, 2009.