Court Opinion

ID: 714157
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:47:12+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:53:13.014384
License: Public Domain

78 F.3d 232
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James ERWIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-1766.
United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
March 6, 1996.

Before:  MERRITT, Chief Judge;  KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.ORDER

1
Prior report:  71 F.3d 218.

2
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc.   Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

3
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

4
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

5
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.