Court Opinion

ID: 5370928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 08:12:10.126907+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:00.689068
License: Public Domain

Decree so far as appealed *931from affirmed, with costs to respondents payable out of the estate, on the authority of Matter of Brewster (246 App. Div. 192; affd., 271 N. Y. 599). All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the authority of Shipman v. Rollins (98 N. Y. 311, 314, 330); Matter of Crane (164 id. 71, 76); Dickerson v. Sheehy (156 App. Div. 101, 104; affd., 209 N. Y. 592); Benedict v. Salmon (177 App. Div. 385; affd., 223 N. Y. 707); Matter of Silsby (229 id. 396); Matter of von Kleist (265 id. 422, 427, and cases cited); LaFarge v. Brown (31 App. Div. 542); Matter of Foster (174 Misc. 933, 935). (The decree judicially settles and allows the accounts of the trustees, adjudges that no fraud has been committed, and construes a will.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.