Court Opinion

ID: 2923434
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:30:42.062213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:26.014989
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-05-287-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________

 
         IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., III AND
T.E.C., CHILDREN
_______________________________________________________
 
 
             On appeal from the County
Court at Law No. 5
                           of Nueces
County, Texas.
_______________________________________________________
  
 
MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                Before Justices
Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
                       Memorandum Opinion Per
Curiam
 
Appellants, MELISSA CANTU AND ALFONSO ELIZONDO, attempted to perfect an appeal
from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 04-60238-5.  The clerk=s record was received on April 21, 2005.  

Upon review of the
clerk=s record, it appeared
that the notice of appeal did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
25.1(e).  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this
defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it
could be done.  Appellants were advised
that, if the defect was not corrected within thirty days from the date of
receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed.  Appellants failed to file a response as requested
by this Court=s notice.  Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal.
The Court, having
considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, and appellee=s motion to dismiss
the appeal,  is of the opinion that
appellee=s motion should be
granted.  Appellee=s motion to dismiss
the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and 
filed this the 30th day of March,
2006.