Court Opinion

ID: 8436865
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:45:27.744701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.865585
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Mariano Duran appeals the district court’s1 judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, wherein Duran sought relief based on the Supreme Court’s holding in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). The district court granted a certificate of appealability on whether the rule an*626nounced in Blakely applies retroactively to cases on collateral review, and the Supreme Court thereafter issued its decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because neither decision applies retroactively to final convictions, see Never Misses A Shot v. United States, 413 F.3d 781, 783-84 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam), we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and Duran’s pro se motion for new counsel is denied.

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.