Court Opinion

ID: 7802707
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-23 11:13:01.15701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:29:30.127692
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                   San Antonio, Texas
                                         August 16, 2022

                                      No. 04-22-00507-CR

                                        Marlene LEVEN,
                                           Appellant

                                                v.

                                      The STATE of Texas,
                                            Appellee

                  From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                               Trial Court No. 2021CR4845A
                           Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

                                         ORDER
        Appellant Marlene Leven entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which
she pleaded nolo contendere to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence in
accordance with the agreement on June 3, 2022 and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-
bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, a notice of appeal was due July 5, 2022,
or the notice and a motion for extension of time to file, were due fifteen days later on July 18,
2022. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. The record contains a notice of appeal file stamped
August 8, 2022, but Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

        The clerk’s record also includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and the
written plea bargain agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal
“if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the
record.” Id. The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the
punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does
not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding
that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification
is accurate).

       Appellant is given notice that this appeal will be dismissed unless, by September 6,
2022, (1) she files a response establishing that the notice of appeal was timely filed by mail and
(2) an amended certification showing that she has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate
record. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely
notice of appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d);
37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits,
No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for
publication).

        We order all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We
further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and
the court reporter.

                                                     _________________________________
                                                     Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of August, 2022.

                                                     ___________________________________
                                                     Michael A. Cruz,
                                                     Clerk of Court