Court Opinion

ID: 9949722
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-12 15:01:01.539505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:36.944145
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-5102     Document: 010111014034       Date Filed: 03/12/2024    Page: 1
                                                                                   FILED
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                          March 12, 2024
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-5102
                                                   (D.C. No. 4:21-CR-00324-GKF-1)
  DUSTIN JAMES GULLETT,                                       (N.D. Okla.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                          _________________________________

 Before HARTZ, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                   _________________________________

       Dustin James Gullett pleaded guilty to coercion and enticement of a minor and

 received a sentence within the advisory sentencing guidelines range. Despite an

 appeal waiver in his plea agreement, he filed this appeal. The government moves to

 enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal pursuant to United States v. Hahn,

 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Mr. Gullett responds that he does

 not object to the government’s motion. Based on Mr. Gullett’s non-opposition, we

 grant the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss this appeal.

                                             Entered for the Court
                                             Per Curiam

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.