Court Opinion

ID: 4453550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-11-06 21:07:08.201785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:28:02.496894
License: Public Domain

People v Rodgers (2019 NY Slip Op 07903)

People v Rodgers

2019 NY Slip Op 07903

Decided on November 6, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 6, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2017-12783

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vLoyd Rodgers, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 10278/17)

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (William Kastin of counsel), for appellant.
John M. Ryan, Acting District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J.), imposed October 26, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrealese supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court