Court Opinion

ID: 5567938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:05:55.514146+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:39.446584
License: Public Domain

Little, J.
In view of the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, this court, without intimating whether there should or should not be a recovery, is of the opinion that the present case ought to have been submitted to a jury, and that therefore it was error to grant a nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Action for damages. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. July term, 1896.
Garrard, Meldrim & Newman, for plaintiffs. Lawton & Cunningham and T M. Cunningham Jr., for defendants.