Court Opinion

ID: 4515509
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-12 16:09:02.869568+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:44.642664
License: Public Domain

People v Mateen (2020 NY Slip Op 01721)

People v Mateen

2020 NY Slip Op 01721

Decided on March 12, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 12, 2020

Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, González, JJ.

11274 1343/16

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vJamal Mateen, Defendant-Appellant.

Christina Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Emma L. Shreefter of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered October 4, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 12, 2020
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.