Court Opinion

ID: 604985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:24:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:16:15.029771
License: Public Domain

991 F.2d 787
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James CALHOUN-EL, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Bernard D. SMITH, Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary,Respondent-Appellee.
No. 92-6871.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  February 12, 1993Decided:  April 19, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-2191-K)
James Calhoun-EL, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
James Calhoun-EL appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Calhoun-EL v. Smith, No. CA-91-2191-K (D. Md. Aug. 5, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED