Court Opinion

ID: 8419370
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 19:34:20.660376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:21.804227
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Johnny Ray Niles appeals his conviction and 33-month sentence following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Niles’ counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant did not file a supplemental pro se brief, nor did the government file a brief.
Our consideration of counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.