Court Opinion

ID: 8014309
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:02:10.454844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:14.660193
License: Public Domain

BRACE, P. J.
— This is an action in ejectment to recover possession of lots 15 and 16 in block 3 in the town of Leeds in Jackson county. The petition is in common form and was filed November 1,1898. The answer is a general denial. The ease was tried before the court without a jury on April 14, 1899. On the trial the plaintiff introduced documentary evidence showing title in himself to the premises, and then introduced a witness who testified that he knew the lots, that the defendant was in possession of them, that there is a house on the lots, and that the defendant was then living in the house and had been for more than two years. The defendant, after cross-examining the witness, demurred to the evidence, his demurrer was overruled, judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, and the defendant brings the case here by appeal.
The only ground urged for reversal is that the evidence was insufficient to show possession by the defendant of the identical lots described in the petition, counsel for defendant claiming that the probative force of the direct and positive evidence of plaintiff’s witness on this subject was so impaired by his cross-examination that the court ought to have held it insufficient The trial court was of a different opinion, and sitting as a jury trying this question of fact in an action at *535law on the evidence, the finding of that court supported by the evidence is final and conclusive on this court as to' the weight of it. This we have so often ruled that a citation of eases, other than those contained in the brief of counsel for plaintiff, is unnecessary. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
All concur.