Court Opinion

ID: 4463643
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-12 17:00:38.281996+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:53:41.739735
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10228      Document: 00515232511         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/11/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 19-10228
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   December 11, 2019
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                      Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

QUINTON SHELTON, also known as Debo,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:18-CR-272-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Quinton Shelton has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Shelton has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow
us to make a fair evaluation of Shelton’s claims of ineffective assistance of

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-10228    Document: 00515232511     Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/11/2019

                                 No. 19-10228

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Shelton’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2