Court Opinion

ID: 8672401
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:11:49.990922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:21.212639
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
P. Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985,1986 (2000), and Bivens v. Six Unknoum Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shafer v. Hartman, No. 8:08-cv00577-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.