Court Opinion

ID: 990134
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:16:35.343326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:43.589965
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6384

SAMUEL DAVID JOHNSON,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

VIRGINIA STATE PAROLE BOARD,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-96-210-R)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel David Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Johnson v. Virginia State Parole Bd., No. CA-96-210-R (W.D.
Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2