Court Opinion

ID: 4995064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-28 09:14:54.35152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:16:49.389808
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                     NO. 03-21-00472-CV

     In re Round Rock Independent School District, Board of Trustees of Round Rock
 Independent School District, Dr. Hafedh Azaiez, in his official capacity as Superintendent
    of Round Rock Independent School District, and Amy Weir, Amber Feller, Tiffanie
   Harrison, Dr. Jun Xiao, Dr. Mary Bone, Cory Vessa, Danielle Weston, in their official
            capacities as trustees of the Round Rock Independent School District

                  ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

                Relators Round Rock Independent School District; Board of Trustees of Round

Rock Independent School District; Dr. Hafedh Azaiez, in his official capacity as Superintendent

of Round Rock Independent School District; and Amy Weir, Amber Feller, Tiffanie Harrison,

Dr. Jun Xiao, Dr. Mary Bone, Cory Vessa, Danielle Weston, in their official capacities as

trustees of the Round Rock Independent School District (collectively, the “School District”) have

filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from an ex parte temporary restraining order

entered by the district court on September 14, 2021. 1      Because we conclude the order is

procedurally void, we conditionally grant the School District’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                This proceeding concerns a mask requirement implemented on August 16, 2021,

by the School District as part of its COVID-19 safety protocols. The State of Texas filed a

       1   We stayed the temporary restraining order on September 17, 2021.
verified original petition and application for temporary and permanent injunctive relief three

weeks later, alleging that the School District’s mask requirement violates Executive Order GA-

38 2 and, among other things, requesting a temporary restraining order to prevent the School

District from enforcing the mask requirement. Before the State could obtain a setting on their

request, the trial court entered an ex parte temporary restraining order on September 14,

prohibiting the School District from enforcing a mask mandate for as long as GA-38 (or a future

executive order containing the same prohibition) remains in effect.

               Mandamus relief is available when the trial court abuses its discretion and the

relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787

(Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding). The parties do not dispute that the trial court did not hold a

hearing prior to entering the order and do not dispute that the State did not notify Relators that it

was seeking a temporary restraining order until after the order had already been entered by the

trial court. See Ex Parte, Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) (defining “ex parte” as “[o]n

or from one party only, usu[ally] without notice to or argument from the adverse party”). Even

though the trial court entered the order ex parte, the order itself fails to comply with the

requirements under Rule 680, most notably by failing to state “why the order was granted

without notice.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 680.

               Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion by entering a void order. See

In re Office of Att’y Gen., 257 S.W.3d 695, 697 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Orders that fail

       2  GA-38 is an executive order issued by Governor Greg Abbott, which among other
things prohibits government entities—including school districts—from requiring any person to
wear a face mask or otherwise mandating that a person wear a face covering. Numerous
challenges to that portion of GA-38 are pending throughout the State, including in an appeal
currently pending before this Court, Abbott v. La Joya Independent School District, which has
been assigned appellate cause number 03-21-00428-CV.

                                                 2
to fulfill [the Rule 680 and 684] requirements are void.”). 3 The School District also lacks an

adequate remedy by appeal because the temporary restraining order is not appealable. See id. at

698; In re Texas Nat. Res. Conservation Comm’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 207 (Tex. 2002)

(orig. proceeding).

               We therefore conditionally grant the School District’s petition for writ of

mandamus and direct the trial court to vacate its September 14, 2021 order granting a temporary

restraining order. The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply.

                                               __________________________________________
                                               Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith

Filed: September 24, 2021

       3   The School District also contends that this proceeding is an impermissible collateral
attack on the injunction at issue in La Joya ISD, which enjoined enforcement of GA-38 as to the
named plaintiffs in that suit. Although both proceedings concern similar challenges to GA-38,
any collateral-attack argument by Relators is more appropriately raised in the first instance
before the trial court below.

                                                   3