Court Opinion

ID: 6858494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:45:19.681053+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:12.237579
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The interlocutory decree of the District Court entered herein April 12, 1933> is vacated and this case remanded to that court for further proceedings, in accordance with law. The court does not pass upon the sufficiency of the moving papers or the opposing affidavits as challenged by the assignments of error Nos. 1 and 2. The District Court erred in not granting appellants’ motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction as it should not have been issued except upon compliance with the provisions of section 382, title 28 USCA. This is so, even if the appellees could otherwise justify, from the moving papers presented, the granting of a preliminary injunction as a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
The decree of the District Court is vacated and the ease is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with law; neither party recovers costs of appeal.