Court Opinion

ID: 6955293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:36:48.254326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:12.613064
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Affirmed. State v. Hart, 299 Or 128, 139, 699 P2d 1113 (1985) (holding that the defendant was not entitled to a civil jury trial under the restitution statutes in ORS chapter 137); State v. N. R. L., 249 Or App 321, 329-30, 277 P3d 564, rev allowed, 352 Or 377 (2012) (explaining that subsequent amendments to the juvenile and criminal restitution statutes were intended to further deterrent and rehabilitative purposes).