Court Opinion

ID: 9300230
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:06:42.640604+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:39.271516
License: Public Domain

BY THE COURT.
The rule is in the alternative, that the plaintiff shall try the cause, or be nonsuited. He has a right to say he will try, rather than be nonsuited; and how can we accept his offer to try, when the cause is not in a state for trial? To say that he shall be nonsuited, unless he do what the court will not permit, is to take away the alternative. Were the plaintiff to offer to file a declaration now, still the cause could not be tried without a rule to plead, and a plea filed, and jury struck, or venire issued; but under another rule of this court, made in 1800, all rules to plead, are to be given from month to month in the clerk’s office; and were we to allow a rule to be taken here, we should violate that rule.
Meredith then moved for a rule on defendant to plead in a month.
' BY THE COURT. As the rule laid down in 1806, seems strangely to have been neg*349lected, or may not generally have been known, we will permit this innovation on the standing rule, during this term; but in future motions of this sort will be refused.