Court Opinion

ID: 1890755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:44:21.67343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:33.392127
License: Public Domain

313 S.W.3d 709 (2010)
Nathaniel McDANIEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93579.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 15, 2010.
Gwenda Renee', Robinson, District Defender, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
*710 Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Nathaniel McDaniel appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).