Court Opinion

ID: 9691730
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 00:00:25.628199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:25.756338
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40778        Document: 00516871896             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/24/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________                     United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 22-40778
                                                                             FILED
                                                                       August 24, 2023
                                    Summary Calendar
                                    ____________                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Gerardo Ledezma-Zuniga,

                                              Defendant—Appellant.
                     ______________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 7:22-CR-1100-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
         The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo
   Ledezma-Zuniga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ledezma-Zuniga has filed a response.
   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40778    Document: 00516871896         Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/24/2023

                                 No. 22-40778

   reflected therein, as well as Ledezma-Zuniga’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2