Court Opinion

ID: 9855098
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 06:19:26.958328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:40.136999
License: Public Domain

Black, J.
(dissenting). The constitutional question, turning upon the claimed applicability in bar of defendant’s prosecution of the first sentence appearing in Const 1908, art 5, § 21,  was not raised in either court below. For reasons often recited, it is not before this Court. And the “dubious” nature of its presentation (see Taunt v. Moegle [1956], 344 Mich 683, 686, quoting Aircraft db Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Kirsch [1947], 331 US 752, 763 [67 S Ct 1493, 91 L Ed 1796]) should preclude consideration of that question on motion of the Court.
*300I stand by tbe opinion of Division 2 (11 Midi App 213) and therefore vote to affirm.
Kelly, J., concurred with Black, J.
T. G-. Kavanagh, J., did not sit.