Court Opinion

ID: 9352721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-09 16:09:18.557812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:58:15.325857
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Ohio Capital Journal v. Pub. Util. Comm. of Ohio, 2022-Ohio-4825.]

                              IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

 OHIO CAPITAL JOURNAL, et al.                           Case No. 2022-00469PQ

         Requester                                      Judge Patrick E. Sheeran

         v.                                             JUDGMENT ENTRY

 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF
 OHIO

         Respondent

        {¶1} On November 30, 2022, a Special Master issued a Report and
Recommendation (R&R) in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends
denial of a motion to dismiss filed by Respondent. (R&R, 3.) The Special Master states:
                Upon consideration of the pleadings and attachments the Special
        Master recommends the court find requester’s claim for production of
        records moot to the extent that responsive records have been provided prior
        to the filing of the complaint and during mediation. The Special Master
        further recommends the court find that the [Respondent] has thus far
        produced records in a timely manner and urge that office to continue and
        complete its review and production of the remaining responsive records
        within a reasonable time. The Special Master recommends the court absorb
        costs in this action.
(R&R, 7.)
        {¶2} Neither party has timely objected to the Report and Recommendation, as
permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely
objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this Court is required to
“promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it
determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report
and recommendation.”
Case No. 2022-00469PQ                         -2-                      JUDGMENT ENTRY

         {¶3} Upon review, the Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect
evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts the Report
and Recommendation.            In accordance with the Special Master’s Report and
Recommendation, the Court finds that Requester’s claim for production of records is moot
to the extent that responsive records have been provided before the filing of the Complaint
and during mediation, and Respondent has thus far produced records in a timely manner.
The Court denies Respondent’s motion to dismiss. The Court asks Respondent to
continue and complete its review and production of the remaining responsive records
within a reasonable time. Court costs are absorbed the Court. The Clerk shall serve
upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

                                            PATRICK E. SHEERAN
                                            Judge

Filed December 20, 2022
Sent to S.C. Reporter 1/9/23