Court Opinion

ID: 9457116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:13:05.576527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:13.555431
License: Public Domain

IRVING R. KAUFMAN,
Circuit Judge (concurring):
I agree that the dismissals of each of the actions brought by-appellant Dorak should be affirmed, but I would not do so for all of the reasons stated by Judge Travia below. It is sufficient that with respect to none of his complaints did Dorak comply with New York County Law § 52 and New York General Municipal Law § 50-e, requiring that Dorak serve notices of claim upon defendants within ninety days after each cause of action arose. See Siegel v. Epstein, 17 N.Y.2d 639, 269 N.Y.S.2d 138, 216 N.E.2d 341 (1966).