Court Opinion

ID: 9389557
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-25 20:06:55.991085+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:28.432329
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Anderson v. Monroe Cty. Common Pleas Court, 2023-Ohio-1343.]

            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                           SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                MONROE COUNTY

                                    BRIAN L. ANDERSON,

                                              Relator,

                                                   v.

                   MONROE COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT
                        (JUDGE JULIE R. SELMON),

                                           Respondent.

                      OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
                                      Case No. 22 MO 0019

                                         Writ of Mandamus

                                        BEFORE:
               David A. D’Apolito, Cheryl L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Judges.

                                            JUDGMENT:
                                             Dismissed.

Brian L. Anderson, Pro Se, #A796871, Noble Correctional Institution, 15708
McConnelsville Road, Caldwell, Ohio 43724, Relator and

Atty. James L. Peters, Monroe County Prosecuting Attorney, 101 North Main Street,
Room 15, Woodsfield, Ohio 43793, for Respondent.

                                       Dated: April 25, 2023
                                                                                         –2–

PER CURIAM.

       {¶1}   Relator, Brian L. Anderson, brings this original action with a pro se petition
for a writ of mandamus naming as Respondent, Monroe County Court of Common Pleas
Judge Julie R. Selmon. Counsel for Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss on the
basis that the petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because
the petition does not comply with the mandatory filing requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this
court must dismiss this action.
       {¶2}   R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for an inmate who files
a civil action against a government employee or entity. In the present case, Respondent
is a government employee and Relator, incarcerated in the Noble Correctional Institution,
is a self-represented inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if the
inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in the
commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d
63, 2005-Ohio-3671, 831 N.E.2d 435, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are
mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”)

                                      Filing Fee Waiver

       {¶3}   In an affidavit included with his petition, Relator states he is without the
necessary funds to pay the costs of this action and is requesting the filing fee and security
deposit be waived. R.C. 2969.25(C) applies when an inmate seeks a waiver of the
prepayment of the filing fees:

       (C) If an inmate who files a civil action or appeal against a government entity
       or employee seeks a waiver of the prepayment of the full filing fees
       assessed by the court in which the action or appeal is filed, the inmate shall
       file with the complaint or notice of appeal an affidavit that the inmate is
       seeking a waiver of the prepayment of the court’s full filing fees and an
       affidavit of indigency. The affidavit of waiver and the affidavit of indigency
       shall contain all of the following:

Case No. 22 MO 0019
                                                                                        –3–

       (1) A statement that sets forth the balance in the inmate account of the
       inmate for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional
       cashier;

       (2) A statement that sets forth all other cash and things of value owned by
       the inmate at that time.

       {¶4}   As indicated, Relator’s petition includes an affidavit averring he is without
sufficient financial means to prepay or give security for the costs of this action. However,
the affidavit does not include a statement that sets forth the balance in his inmate account
for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier. R.C.
2969.25(C)(1). Nor does it include a statement that sets forth all other cash and things
of value owned by Relator at the time he filed the petition. R.C. 2969.25(C)(2).
       {¶5}   In light of these procedural deficiencies and on the court’s own motion, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is hereby
DISMISSED.        As a result, all remaining motions, including Respondent’s motion to
dismiss, and unresolved filings are hereby dismissed as moot.
       {¶6}   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Civ.R. 58, that the Clerk of the
Monroe County Court of Appeals shall immediately serve upon all parties (including
unrepresented or self-represented parties) notice of this judgment and its date of entry
upon the journal. Costs taxed to Relator.

JUDGE DAVID A. D’APOLITO

JUDGE CHERYL L. WAITE

JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB

Case No. 22 MO 0019