Court Opinion

ID: 9725303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 11:39:59.299236+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:13.582787
License: Public Domain

Black, J.
(dissenting). As against defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs are entitled to prove, if they can, their pleaded factual allegation that, hy the laws of a foreign country, in which country the testator directed disposition of trust fund D, the testator’s alternative- direction (subparagraph “m” of paragraph “1” of article 7) cannot be effectuated.
I would reverse and remand for entry of order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, affirm with leave to submit an amendment meeting what to me are hypertechnical objections to this possibly well-founded bill; such amendment to be filed below within 30 days next following release of these opinions. For an instance of such suggested alternative and disposition thereof, see Kent v. Bell, 368 Mich 443, 451, 452.
J. Kavanagh and Souris, JJ., concurred with Black,