Court Opinion

ID: 4386361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-11 16:38:52.635552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:38.285599
License: Public Domain

People v Sutton (2019 NY Slip Op 02751)

People v Sutton

2019 NY Slip Op 02751

Decided on April 11, 2019

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 11, 2019

108741

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
vALIJUAON SUTTON, Appellant.

Calendar Date: March 15, 2019

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

Todd G. Monahan, Schenectady, for appellant.
Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Sypniewski, J.), rendered May 4, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. He pleaded guilty to that charge and waived his right to appeal. He was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement as an admitted second violent felony offender to a six-year prison term, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.
Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).
Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.