Court Opinion

ID: 1029055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:51:00.301056+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:23.044112
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Salazar,
  
  No. 1:06-cr-00123-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.