Court Opinion

ID: 2925807
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:27:21.951258+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:50.765932
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-189-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________
 
PINTAIL PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC., 	Appellant,

v.

OSPREY PETROLEUM COMPANY, INC. AND
OSPREY PETROLEUM PARTNERS, L.P., 	Appellees.
___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 Appellant, Pintail Production Company, Inc., and appellees, Osprey Petroleum
Company, Inc. and Osprey Petroleum Partners, L.P., have filed a joint motion to dismiss
this appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and
compromise their differences.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
	The Court, having previously abated the appeal pending settlement, now
REINSTATES the appeal, and, considering the documents on file and the joint motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed
the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our
mandate will issue forthwith.

									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed 
this the 13th day of March, 2008.