Court Opinion

ID: 680203
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:34:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:16.260015
License: Public Domain

37 F.3d 1492NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David BRIGHT, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Sewall SMITH, Warden;  Paul Knight;  Joseph Zbozien,Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6796.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.  (CA-94-658)
David Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Audrey J. S. Carrion, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bright v. Smith, No. CA-94-658 (D. Md. July 4, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.