Court Opinion

ID: 4724613
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-12 02:50:35.330753+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:07:46.660091
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Appellants in 1896 obtained judgment before a justice of the peace, against one Chambers, for $119.81. Chambers thereafter sued out a writ of certiorari to the superior court, and executed a bond staying the proceedings in the justice court. The superior court set aside the judgment of the justice court. Appellants then appealed to this court, which reversed the judgment of the superior court, with instructions to dismiss the certiorari proceedings. The superior court thereupon dismissed the judgment, and entered judgment for costs in favor of appellants for $66.55, which has not been paid. Thereafter *362appellants commenced this action upon the bond against the surety thereon (respondent here) for $82.99, the balance due on the justice court judgment, with interest, and $66.55 costs, and a claim for $100 attorney’s fees paid in defending the certiorari proceedings in the superior and supreme courts. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, because the amount in controversy does not exceed $200, and the legality of a tax, impost, assessment, toll, municipal fine, or the validity of a statute is not involved. The claim for $100 attorney’s fees is certainly not a part of the judgment or amount in controversy. The motion to dismiss must therefore be granted. See § 4650, Bal. Code.