Court Opinion

ID: 8463675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:02:41.421509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:11.595087
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase, No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.