Court Opinion

ID: 9963261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-24 20:07:40.751796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:45.751906
License: Public Domain

People v Naim (2024 NY Slip Op 02213)

People v Naim

2024 NY Slip Op 02213

Decided on April 24, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 24, 2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LARA J. GENOVESI
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2022-10031
 (Ind. No. 70827/22)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vShahid Naim, appellant. 

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Tina Peng of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Toni M. Cimino, J.), imposed October 31, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., IANNACCI, GENOVESI and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court