Court Opinion

ID: 9571180
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:29:40.886097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:15.765177
License: Public Domain

Clinton, J.,
concurring.
I concur in the result. I do not agree that a temporary stop on a level highway where there are no closely following vehicles and there is good visibility for vehicles approaching from the rear for a considerable distance makes a submissible issue on violation of' the statute. Here there is evidence of restricted visibility - *226for vehicles following the plaintiff caused not only by the plaintiff’s vehicle, but by the truck which it was following which turned off just before the accident. The jury could find that the plaintiff should have been aware of this and that possible finding plus the fact there was evidence that it was practicable for the plaintiff to have parked on the shoulder of the road and entirely off the main-traveled portion were circumstances which created a jury question as to the plaintiff’s contributory negligence.