Court Opinion

ID: 4066177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 22:30:13.178073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:33.062065
License: Public Domain

1

1                           NO. 13-212             FILED IN
                                            4th COURT OF APPEALS
2                                            SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
                                            09/11/15 11:24:40 AM
3    ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC.     )   IN  THE KEITH
                                               DISTRICT
                                                     E. HOTTLECOURT
                                  )                 Clerk
4                                 )
     VS.                          ) 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
5                                 )
                                  )
6    SELECT BUILDING SYSTEMS,     )
     INC., TRI-BAR RANCH, LTD.    )
7    AND G&R LAND COMPANY, INC.   )   KENDALL COUNTY, TEXAS
8
9
10   ------------------------------------------------------
11                      REPORTER'S RECORD
                         VOLUME 2 OF 5
12
     ------------------------------------------------------
13
14                On the 16th day of March 2015, the
15   following proceedings came on to be heard in the
16   above-entitled and numbered cause before the Honorable
17   Bill Palmer, Judge presiding, held in Boerne, Kendall
18   County, Texas.
19                Proceedings reported by machine
20   stenographic method.
21
22
23
24
25

                       TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                      PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                     2

1                A P P E A R A N C E S:
2
3    MR. JIMMIE L.J. BROWN, JR.
     Attorney at Law
4    3102 Cherry Creek Drive
     Missouri City, Texas 77459
5    Phone: (713) 419-1021
     ATTORNEY FOR ROBERTSON ELECTRIC
6
7           - AND -
8
     MR. TOM C. CLARK
9    DEALEY, ZIMMERMANN, CLARK, MALOUF & BLEND
     Attorneys at Law
10   3131 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1201
     Dallas, Texas 75219
11   Phone: (214) 559-4400
     ATTORNEY FOR SELECT BUILDING SYSTEMS
12
13          - AND -
14
     MR. JOHN W. SLATES
15   MS. COLBIE BRAZELL
     SLATES HARWELL
16   Attorneys at Law
     1700 Pacific, Suite 3800
17   Dallas, Texas 75201
     Phone: (469) 317-1000
18   ATTORNEYS FOR THE TRI-BAR RANCH COMPANY
19
            - AND -
20
21   MR. FRED R. JONES
     GOODE, CASSEB, JONES, RIKLIN, CHOATE & WATSON
22   Attorneys at Law
     2122 N. Main Avenue
23   San Antonio, Texas 78212
     Phone: (210) 733-6030
24   ATTORNEY FOR TRI-BAR RANCH COMPANY
25

                  TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                 PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                          3

1                              INDEX
2                         VOLUME 1 OF 3
                        (MARCH 16, 2015)
3
4                                                   PAGE
5    OPENING STATEMENTS:
              MR. BROWN .........................     5
6             MR. JONES .........................    12
              MR. SLATES ........................    14
7
     PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES:
8
         THOMAS PITTMAN
9             Direct Examination ................    25
              Cross-Examination by Mr. Clark ....    99
10            Cross-Examination by Mr. Slates ...   199
              Redirect Examination ..............   262
11
12   COURT REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE ...............   275
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

                       TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                      PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   4

1                        P R O C E E D I N G S
2
3                   THE COURT:    Y'all have a seat, please.
4    Cause number 13-212, Robertson Electric v. Select
5    Buildings, et al.    Y'all make announcements for the
6    record, please.
7                   MR. BROWN:    Thank you, Your Honor.    My
8    name is Jimmie Brown.     I represent Robertson Electric.
9    We're present and ready to go.
10                  THE COURT:    Yes, sir.
11                  MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, Tom Clark and
12   Jonathan Cluck for Select Building Systems, and we're
13   ready to go.
14                  MR. SLATES:    John Slates, Fred Jones, and
15   Colbie Brazell for Tri-Bar; ready to go.
16                  THE COURT:    Okay.   Anybody else?   What
17   happened to Tom Valega?      No more Tom?    He signed some
18   pleadings in there for somebody.      We don't know him?
19                  MR. CLARK:    He was an intervenor, Your
20   Honor.   He just dropped out.
21                  THE COURT:    Okay.   Let me tell you mode
22   of presentation.    On your questioning, just direct,
23   cross, and redirect, and that's it.      If something is
24   brought up on redirect that was not subject to cross,
25   object on those grounds, so we don't go back and

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   5

1    forth, back and forth.      Everybody got that?
2                   MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.
3                   THE COURT:    Okay.    Plaintiff want to make
4    an opening statement?    I remember basically, it's the
5    building of a hangar in Uvalde area and somebody
6    didn't pay a subcontractor.
7                   MR. BROWN:    Yes.
8                   THE COURT:    Everything from the podium,
9    too.
10                  MR. BROWN:    Not a problem.
11                  THE COURT:    As I told you in the past, it
12   makes you look smarter.
13                  MR. BROWN:    Not a problem, Your Honor.
14   We'd like to invoke the Rule.
15                  THE COURT:    Okay.
16                  MR. BROWN:    And --
17                  THE COURT:    What about an opening
18   statement?
19                  MR. BROWN:    Yes.    Basically, Your Honor,
20   the Plaintiff's case is really very, very simple.       And
21   the evidence, for the most part, is pretty much
22   uncontroverted.   My client had entered into a contract
23   with SBS.    He's an electrical installer and basically
24   did that type of work.      In the course of the endeavor,
25   he gets terminated on or about January 23rd of 2013.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    6

1    The evidence will be uncontroverted that on or about
2    November 2nd, Tri-Bar, who is the -- basically the
3    owner and the main party on the SBS/Tri-Bar contract,
4    decided that they wanted to go with another
5    electrician.   That decision is ultimately made on
6    January 14th when they, in fact, do so.       On
7    January 23rd is when they terminate my client.
8                   It's uncontroverted, there's not one
9    documented complaint against my client ever to this
10   date.    They did not have grounds to terminate my
11   client for convenience or for cause.        My client's
12   contract does not permit a for-convenience
13   termination.   And so, they just had no basis to
14   terminate.
15                  Since that time, the evidence will be
16   clear that there have been a myriad of reasons that
17   Tri-Bar has articulated for why they have done this,
18   and each reason has been debunked.     So, I -- when the
19   Court hears from Mr. Pittman, which will be the first
20   witness to testify, we will get an opportunity to find
21   out ultimately what their real reason is.       But the
22   termination of my client was without cause.        My client
23   incurred significant damages as a result thereby.         He
24   has suffered losses well in excess of the contract
25   value.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               7

1                    So, when the evidence fleshes out, this
2    is what the Court will see.    From the onset until now,
3    there's never been a complaint against my client.
4    From the onset until now, the reasons that Tri-Bar has
5    offered for doing the actions that it undertook are
6    unsubstantiated.    From there until now, their case has
7    been a farce.    So, we'll be asking the Court basically
8    to find against Tri-Bar because they tortiously
9    interfered with the contract and they had no basis to
10   do so.   The costs that they alleged to -- to avoid
11   when they, in fact, take on C&S, which was the
12   replacement for my client, they incurred well in
13   excess of a hundred thousand dollars more in costs.
14   Nothing of what they have said makes sense.
15                   And so, we'll be asking for damages.
16   We'll be asking for damages of the contract value.
17   We'll be asking for damages for the loss that my
18   client has sustained.    These damages are well in
19   excess of $800,000.00.    That there are attorney's fees
20   that have been incurred, and we'll be asking for
21   those.   And we believe that when the Court hears the
22   totality of the evidence, that it will be
23   uncontroverted that the conduct of Tri-Bar pretty much
24   has been unconscionable.
25                   And you'll find that the request is quite

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 8

1    reasonable under the facts of this case.        And we thank
2    the Court for its indulgence to this point.       And
3    hopefully in the next three days we will be as brief
4    as I'm going to be right now.     Thank you.
5                    THE COURT:   Select Building?
6                    MR. CLARK:   Your Honor, Tom Clark.
7    Pleasure to be here.    Your Honor, eight months ago we
8    were here on a motion for summary judgment.       And the
9    issue at the time under the AIA contract was whether
10   the owner had terminated for convenience or terminated
11   for cause.   It only becomes a termination for cause if
12   there is a written notice under one of four conditions
13   that are in paragraph -- section 14 of the general
14   conditions of the standard AIA contract.
15                   And at the time we argued that there was
16   no such notice.    The Court made a very pointed inquiry
17   and said, "Was there a notice provided prior to the
18   termination?"    Mr. Slates, who is back there behind
19   us, said, "We are still looking, Your Honor."       Here we
20   are eight months later; they haven't found it.        It
21   didn't exist then.    It doesn't exist now.     There was
22   no notice of any defects or any of the four reasons
23   why an owner can terminate for cause.
24                   So, it's going to be undisputed at the
25   beginning of the day and at the end of the day that

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   9

1    this was a termination for convenience.        The owner,
2    Tri-Bar, terminated SBS for convenience.        Is that a
3    breach?    No.    The owner has every right to do so.
4    It's in the contract.      It's 14.2 of the general
5    conditions.      14.2.2 of the general conditions says, if
6    there's a termination for convenience, the owner shall
7    pay the contractor any amount due for the work
8    performed to date, profit on the work not yet
9    performed, and that's it.       That's the entirety of that
10   section.    That's what we're here to prove today, Your
11   Honor.    That's the section that's in play.      The amount
12   that we're due is $304,926.88 plus $24,649.70 in the
13   profit on the work not yet performed.         Plus attorney's
14   fees of -- I believe our attorney's fees testimony by
15   the end of this -- by the end of Wednesday will be
16   somewhere around $95,000.00, which I'll put on the
17   stand in appropriate testimony.
18                    That's what we're telling you at the
19   beginning.    That's what the issue is going to be at
20   the very end of the day.        What you're going to hear in
21   the meantime from Tri-Bar is -- in other words, our
22   case is as simple as Mr. Robertson's is.        There was a
23   termination.      We got kicked out.   It was for
24   convenience.      We're done.   Part of our 304,000 is the
25   money that Select Building Systems owes to Robertson.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                10

1    At the time that we were instructed to terminate
2    Robertson by the owner, we owed Robertson $54,000.00
3    for material, work, everything that was done.      We
4    never got paid by the owner.   We didn't pay Mr.
5    Robertson.
6                  That much is also going to be completely
7    undisputed throughout the entire case.      We have the
8    pay with pay clause.   And that's kind of why we're
9    sitting together over here, is we're both suing
10   Tri-Bar to get our money.   The workmen have not been
11   paid.   What you're going to hear over here is, it
12   should have, could have, would have.       We could have
13   sent a notice.   We would have sent a notice.     And if
14   we'd done -- if we followed what we were going to be
15   doing, we should have sent a notice.       But we didn't
16   send a notice.   And what Mr. Brown was referring to
17   is, in November, you'll see it laid out flat out that
18   Mr. Pittman and others -- you'll see the evidence --
19   talk about a plan to get rid of us.    They just didn't
20   follow through with it.   So, we end up with a
21   termination for convenience.
22                 You're going to find that they want to
23   try to claim after the fact -- Tri-Bar wants to claim
24   after the fact that there were a bunch of defects and
25   problems with the project that they discovered after

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               11

1    the fact.   These are all made up.     And we'll go
2    through -- that's what Mr. Brown was talking about
3    with the -- the debunked part.      They walk in and they
4    say, oh, we need to change the roof; a hundred
5    thousand dollars.    There's nothing wrong with the
6    roof.   And you'll hear testimony that -- from
7    disinterested witnesses to tell you that the stuff
8    that they -- that Tri-Bar ended up doing after the
9    fact did not need to be done.     But more to the point
10   legally, there's no basis for an offset.     In that
11   termination for convenience clause, there's nothing
12   that says, oh, and by the way, if you find out
13   something later on where you should have terminated
14   for convenience, you get to go back and do a do-over.
15   You'd have to add words to the contract to get there.
16                  So, we have all these issues that were
17   added after the fact.     They call them repairing
18   defects.    Our clients are going to call them finishing
19   work; doing punch list items; doing that which a
20   person would ordinarily do to finish off a project.
21   What you're going to see, there are pictures of an
22   unfinished project without finished trim put on it to
23   make it look good.    And that's all.    And at the end of
24   the day, Select Building Systems was never given an
25   appropriate list of things that needed to be fixed and

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    12

1    an opportunity to go out and cure it.          You can't fault
2    a man for not fixing something if he was never given a
3    chance to come in and cure it.        That's again part of
4    the termination for convenience -- you can have
5    termination for cause if they wanted to try to get
6    there after the fact, but they still had to give us
7    the chance to come out and cure, fix, or finish.          They
8    chose not to do that.
9                  So, at the beginning of the day and at
10   the end of the day, we're going to end up with a
11   termination for convenience that Tri-Bar owes Select
12   Building Systems $304,926.00, of which we owe
13   Robertson $54,999.00.      And the artisans need to be
14   paid.   Thank you.
15                 THE COURT:      Okay.   Mr. Slates, Mr. Jones?
16                 MR. JONES:      Your Honor, I'm going to make
17   a few brief remarks -- good morning, Your Honor -- a
18   few brief remarks and introduce John Slates, as lead
19   counsel, and Colbie Brazell, and also we have with us
20   Wes Sharples, who's in-house counsel for Tri-Bar.
21                 We obviously disagree.          We agree with
22   very little of what has been said so far.          I believe
23   you can understand that.      We at least agree this is an
24   airplane hangar project that went way bad.          We chose
25   SBS because we thought they were nimble.          They told us

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              13

1    that they were nimble.    They told us they had
2    expertise in these type of pre-engineered metal
3    buildings for an airplane hangar.     And the evidence
4    will show that both the Plaintiff and SBS just have
5    the facts wrong.    And the evidence will show that.
6                    They busted all the schedules; all the
7    time schedules.    They knew from the beginning this was
8    a 173-day contract.    You don't pick 173 days just out
9    of your hat.    There was a reason for the urgency of
10   having this done on time.    They promised it would be
11   done on time.    So, we had less than six months to
12   construct this project.    They said they could do it.
13   They tried to explain the delays based upon change
14   orders.   Anybody who's been through a construction
15   project knows that there are going to be changes.
16   They did know -- have actual knowledge -- that there
17   were going to be changes from the plans and specs.
18   Our architect lost trust in the contractor.    Our --
19   this was just a loss of trust on the entire Tri-Bar
20   team based upon these lengthy delays and the
21   misrepresentations about when the product would be
22   finished; when it would be delivered.
23                   So, that's what we're going to show.
24   There were a lot of defects that we discovered only
25   after termination and after our consultants and

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               14

1    experts got in there and found out what was going on;
2    found out that -- all the problems with what had been
3    done.    And so, we're here to defend these claims.      We
4    had no alternative but to terminate the contract.        Did
5    we want to?   No.   Did we need to?    Did we have to?
6    Yes.    John, I'll turn it over to you if you have any
7    other.
8                   MR. SLATES:    Your Honor, just a couple
9    points on the nature of the termination as related by
10   Mr. Clark, and then I'll address some issues raised by
11   Mr. Brown.    It was represented, I believe, during the
12   opening that it was undisputed that this was a
13   termination for convenience.     That's not the case.     I
14   told you that at the motion for summary judgment
15   hearing and I believe that's the reason you denied the
16   motion.   It is clearly disputed, it is firmly
17   disputed, and it is disputed based on the facts of
18   this case.
19                  When you terminate someone for cause, you
20   don't have to pay them until the project is finished.
21   When you terminate someone for convenience, you're
22   supposed to pay them at the time of termination.
23   During the meeting at which Tom Pittman, who is
24   sitting back here, terminated SBS, he made the direct
25   representation, we don't have to pay you right now

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                15

1    under the terms of the contract.     That's a termination
2    for cause.   He told them he was going to try to get
3    them paid because he wanted to part ways amicably and
4    try to get on down the road.    So, he treated it as a
5    termination for cause and he considered it a
6    termination for cause.    And the circumstances are
7    consistent with a termination for cause.    There was
8    justification for a termination for cause.    You will
9    hear the evidence that they busted the schedule again
10   and again and again.    They made representations about
11   when the metal building would be delivered that were
12   not true.    They even said that the metal building
13   would be delivered on dates before it had even been
14   put into production by the metal building
15   manufacturer.    And the architect only found that out
16   after the fact.
17                   This notice issue is a red herring.    When
18   we look at the contract provision, the notice that's
19   required is not a notice and an opportunity to cure.
20   There's nothing that the contractor can do after
21   receiving that notice to avoid a termination.       It's
22   just a notice that this is what we intend to do.      So,
23   the fact that a notice wasn't sent has no substantive
24   impact on what happened on this project.
25                   As I mentioned, the -- or as Fred

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                16

1    mentioned, there were defects discovered after the
2    termination.    The metal building was 2 inches out of
3    plumb.   It's -- it's leaning.   The brick lug that
4    holds up 20 feet of masonry, which weighs I don't know
5    how much, was poured as just a lip on the edge of the
6    foundation.    It wasn't on the grade beam.    It wasn't
7    supported below grade.    And there were countless
8    defects with the metal building itself.      And you'll
9    see the evidence of those defects as we get into this
10   case.
11                  The total cost that Tri-Bar incurred to
12   fix those defects was $317,000.00.     So, whereas SBS
13   contends it's owed $304,000, we contend that we're
14   entitled to an offset of $317,000.00.       There is a
15   difference, as we discussed at the motion for summary
16   judgment hearing, between a breach of warranty claim
17   and a breach of contract claim.     They are myopically
18   focused on the breach of warranty issues.      Yes, if you
19   want someone to come out and make a warranty repair,
20   you have to send them a notice and ask them to do
21   that.    If you want to hold someone liable for breach
22   of contract, there is no such obligation.      And we'll
23   see that in the language of the contract.
24                  With respect to Mr. Robertson, I believe
25   Mr. Brown said it.   There's two claims here, first of

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 17

1    all; a breach of contract claim and the tortious
2    interference claim, which he spent most of his time
3    talking about.    He said the contract is with SBS.
4    That's undisputed.    That is the one thing in this case
5    that I think everyone will have to agree is
6    undisputed.    There is not a shred of evidence that
7    there was any contract between Robertson and Tri-Bar.
8    So, that claim goes away from the get-go.
9                    And then we start talking about tortious
10   interference.    And there was records to the real
11   reason that Robertson made a change.        What you're
12   going to hear from Mr. Pittman is the real reason that
13   they made a change.    And that is because there was a
14   change in scope for the electrical work.       There were
15   some additions made to the scope of the electrical
16   work.   Robertson submitted a bid to perform that work
17   that was $60,000.00.    After the owner came back and
18   said, that's way too high, they started ratcheting it
19   down.   I don't know how they did that.      They must have
20   had some fluff in the bid.    But they eventually got it
21   down to 32,000.    But while all this is going on, Mr.
22   Pittman has gotten a competitive bid from C&S
23   Enterprises.    That bid is $21,119.00; almost a third
24   of the original bid from Robertson.     And Robertson is
25   still one and a half times higher than C&S even after

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 18

1    it backs all the fluff out of its bid.
2                  An owner has a legitimate interest in the
3    cost of his project.    It's reasonable for an owner to
4    want to manage the cost on the project.       And their
5    interest is superior to that of both the general
6    contractor and the subcontractor.       So, they were
7    justified in asking SBS to make a change to C&S, given
8    that they could -- the price that Robertson quoted was
9    50 percent higher than the price that C&S quoted.
10                 Mr. Pittman will tell you that he
11   believed that he had the right to require SBS to make
12   a change in the contract.    He'll tell you that he
13   believed that the contractor allowed it.       And he'll
14   tell you that he did not believe that SBS doing so
15   would in any way be a breach of its subcontract with
16   Robertson.   That's all I have at this point.      And we
17   will attempt to be expeditious in the presentation of
18   our evidence as well.
19                 THE COURT:    Thank you.     Your first
20   witness, Mr. Brown?
21                 MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.    We will call Mr.
22   Pittman to the stand.
23                 MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, I think we have
24   an extra witness that may be in the courtroom.
25                 THE COURT:    Okay.   And somebody asked

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 19

1    that --
2                    MR. TREVINO:   I'm not.
3                    THE COURT:   You're not?
4                    MR. TREVINO:   No.    I'm general counsel
5    for Tri-Bar.
6                    THE COURT:   Okay.    Come on up, Mr.
7    Pittman.
8                    MR. CLARK:   He's actually on our witness
9    list.
10                   THE COURT:   Come on up, sir.
11                   MR. TREVINO:   Excuse me?
12                   MR. CLARK:   You're actually on our
13   witness list.
14                   THE COURT:   I think somebody asked to
15   invoke the Rule, so any other witnesses around?         Okay.
16   Come on up, sir, and tell me one more time your name
17   for the record.
18                   MR. TREVINO:   Yes.   It's Anthony Trevino.
19   I'm general counsel for Tri-Bar.
20                   THE COURT:   Okay.    Raise your right hand.
21                   (At this time the
22                   witness was sworn in.)
23                   THE COURT:   You understand the Rule has
24   been invoked, which means you cannot be in the
25   courtroom while other people testify, nor can you read

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  20

1    any written testimony while this case is going on or
2    discuss the testimony.      Do you understand that, sir?
3                   MR. TREVINO:    I do.
4                   THE COURT:    Okay.    You're excused until
5    we call you.   Thank you.     Mr. Pittman, raise your
6    right hand.
7                   (At this time the
8                   witness was sworn in.)
9                   THE COURT:    Have a seat, sir.
10                  MR. BROWN:    Your Honor --
11                  THE COURT:    Anything else, sir?
12                  MR. SLATES:    I apologize.    I don't recall
13   Mr. Trevino being on your witness list.       He may be
14   identified as a person with relevant facts, but he's
15   not indicated that you were going to call him.
16                  MR. CLARK:    Well, we -- we may.    It
17   depends on whether -- you know, Mr. Morgan obviously
18   had conversations with Mr. Trevino about the defects.
19   So, that may become an issue.        He may be a witness and
20   I don't want to have the Rule violated and him be
21   sitting there listening to everything.
22                  MR. SLATES:    He's a lawyer for the
23   company.   It seems like he would be --
24                  THE COURT:    Well, if he's a witness, then
25   he would be disqualified as a lawyer.        So, we can go

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                21

1    down that trail.    I mean, you're going to call your
2    client, who's going to say something that Counsel told
3    him --
4                    MR. CLARK:    Yes.
5                    THE COURT:    Why would you want him to
6    testify to -- controverting what your client says?
7                    MR. CLARK:    Well, I don't know that I
8    would want to.
9                    THE COURT:    Okay.
10                   MR. CLARK:    But if Mr. Slates wants to
11   call him later to say that Mr. -- I mean, I guess --
12                   THE COURT:    Then he's sitting here under
13   the Rule, then he'd be excluded.
14                   MR. SLATES:   Your Honor, let me try to
15   solve this problem.
16                   THE COURT:    Or we can --
17                   MR. SLATES:   We have no intention of
18   calling Mr. Trevino.    And Mr. Morgan can give his
19   testimony as to what transpired in that conversation.
20   I'll cross-examine him and --
21                   THE COURT:    Okay.   You can have Mr.
22   Trevino stay here.    But then again, if for some reason
23   you want to call him, you can't since the Rule has
24   been invoked.    We understand that?
25                   MR. SLATES:   That's understood.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               22

1                  THE COURT:    Okay.
2                  MR. BROWN:    The exhibits have been
3    previously agreed to.    And we're asking, to the extent
4    that they are, Plaintiff's Exhibits 1 through 34 that
5    we've agreed to --
6                  THE COURT:    Any objections to Plaintiff's
7    1 through 34, Counsel?
8                  MR. SLATES:    The only one that we've
9    raised an objection to, I believe, is Exhibit Number
10   10, which is the affidavit of Tom Pittman.
11                 MR. BROWN:    It's 10.   And of the list,
12   10, which is the affidavit of Tom Pittman, and 21, the
13   deficiencies of C&S, have been pulled.
14                 THE COURT:    Okay.   1 through 34 with the
15   exception of 10 and 21.     Any objection to those?
16                 MR. SLATES:    No objection.
17                 THE COURT:    Okay.   Those are admitted.
18                 MR. CLARK:    And no objection from us
19   either.   Your Honor, do you want all the exhibits now?
20   Because we've kind of --
21                 THE COURT:    If y'all have got a book like
22   that, that would be nice.
23                 MR. CLARK:    We have a copy that you can
24   write on.   These are just the Select Building Systems
25   exhibits that we've agreed on, all except Number --

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   23

1                    THE COURT:    Well, what about the first --
2    is there a binder for me?
3                    MR. CLARK:    All except Number 23 are
4    agreed as admitted in ours.         They're like the
5    Defendant's Exhibits 1 through 117.
6                    THE COURT:    Okay.
7                    MR. CLARK:    That's your copy, so you can
8    write on it.    I've got a separate copy for the --
9                    THE COURT:    Okay.
10                   MR. BROWN:    You can have this one.
11                   THE COURT:    Counsel, as to Defendant's 1
12   through 117, any objections to Defendant, Select
13   Building's --
14                   MR. SLATES:   Only as to 23, Your Honor.
15                   THE COURT:    23.    So, Select Building's
16   Exhibits 1 through 117 are admitted, except for 23?
17                   MR. SLATES:   Yes, Your Honor.
18                   THE COURT:    Okay.
19                   MR. SLATES:   Ours is a bit more
20   complicated.
21                   THE COURT:    Hold on.    Okay.   Go ahead,
22   sir.
23                   MR. SLATES:   Okay.     There are some
24   objections that have been raised to some of our
25   exhibits.   I don't know if you want us to take those

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               24

1    up at the time of introduction, but let me just --
2                   THE COURT:    Let's go through the ones
3    y'all agreed upon.
4                   MR. SLATES:   Certainly.    Okay.   So,
5    stipulated as admitted by all parties of Defendant,
6    Tri-Bar's exhibits are Exhibits 1 through 13.
7                   THE COURT:    Okay.
8                   MR. SLATES:   21 -- excuse me -- not 21.
9    Strike that.   28, 29 through 37, 39, 41, 42, 46
10   through 49.
11                  THE COURT:    46 through 49?
12                  MR. SLATES:   Yes, Your Honor.
13                  THE COURT:    Okay.   Thank you.
14                  MR. SLATES:   51, 52, 54, 56, and 61.
15                  THE COURT:    Is that correct?
16                  MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.
17                  THE COURT:    Counsel, is that correct?
18                  MR. CLARK:    Yes, Your Honor.
19                  THE COURT:    Okay.   Defendant Tri-Bar's 1
20   through 13, 28, 29 through 37, 39, 41, 42, 46 through
21   49, 51, 52, 54, 56, and 61 are admitted.
22                  MR. SLATES:   I apologize, Your Honor.    I
23   omitted -- 15 through 18, I believe, were also
24   stipulated to.
25                  THE COURT:    Is that correct, Counsel for

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 25

1    Plaintiff -- Counsel for Robertson?        15 through 18,
2    he's saying.
3                    MR. BROWN:    Yeah, that's correct.
4                    MR. CLARK:    Yes, Your Honor.
5                    THE COURT:    Okay.   15 through 18 are also
6    admitted for Defendant Tri-Bar.       Go ahead, Mr. Brown.
7                    MR. BROWN:    Thank you.
8                            THOMAS PITTMAN,
9    having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
10                          DIRECT EXAMINATION
11   BY MR. BROWN:
12       Q.     Would you please state your name?
13       A.     Thomas Pittman.
14       Q.     And what is your relationship to Tri-Bar?
15 A. I used to work for Lewis Energy.
16       Q.     And so --
17                   MR. SLATES:   Mr. Brown, I apologize for
18   interrupting you.      I was just going to let the Court
19   know, Mr. Pittman is a type I diabetic.       He may need
20   to take a break and get a piece of candy or something
21   if he gets a little low.
22                   THE COURT:    Okay.   So am I, so that's
23   okay.    We can go together to the candy machine.     Okay.
24   Go ahead, Mr. Brown.
25                   MR. BROWN:    All right.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               26

1        Q.   (BY MR. BROWN)    Were you still working with
2    Tri-Bar on or about June 19th, 2012?
3 A. I believe so.
4        Q.   Okay.    And briefly, what are your
5    qualifications?
6        A.   How far do you want to go back?
7        Q.   Well, this century would be nice, but --
8        A.   Okay.    Well, I started in the construction
9    industry probably around 1977.     While I was going to
10   college, I worked for Ray Ellison.     I was an
11   apprentice for Ray Ellison.    I got a degree from
12   Trinity in building construction.     I've been in the
13   construction business ever since; residential,
14   commercial, multifamily; probably close to $500
15   million worth of work.
16       Q.   And do you hold any licenses?
17       A.   No.   You don't have to hold a license to be a
18   general contractor.   I was certified as an FHA
19   inspector when I was going to college, but I never
20   used that.
21       Q.   And you continued working with Tri-Bar or
22   your employer until when?
23 A. I don't remember.    I want to say it was
24   probably March or April.
25       Q.   Of what year?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            27

1        A.   '13.
2        Q.   2013?
3        A.   Yeah, 2013.
4        Q.   And did you quit or were you terminated?
5        A.   No.    I resigned.
6        Q.   Under what basis?    Why did you resign?
7        A.   Well, at the time I was looking at starting
8    another business with an entrepreneur and investor.
9        Q.   Now, there's a contract, I believe, that you
10   entered into with -- or for Tri-Bar with SBS Select
11   Building Systems; is that correct?
12 A. I didn't enter into a contract with them.    I
13   mean, Lewis -- Rod Lewis personally did under Tri-Bar.
14   I mean, I don't know the specifics of it, but --
15       Q.   And you're identified in the contract as the
16   representative; is that correct?
17       A.   Yes.    I was the construction manager for
18   Lewis Energy.
19       Q.   And in your capacity in this contract, what
20   is it that you would do?
21       A.   Well, I was an owner's rep.
22       Q.   So, what would you do?
23       A.   Well, I would oversee construction projects.
24   I acted as the owner's rep with my eyes and ears on
25   the project in all aspects.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 28

1        Q.     So, does that mean that you're reviewing the
2    subcontracts that come in, meet with --
3        A.     No.    I didn't review subcontracts.   Our
4    contract was with SBS.
5        Q.     So, you had nothing to do with any of the
6    subcontracts that came in?       You didn't look at them,
7    didn't know anything about them?
8        A.     No.
9        Q.     And you're aware that my client entered into
10   his contract with SBS on or about June 9th, 2012; is
11   that correct?
12 A. I'm not sure when your client entered into a
13   contract with SBS.
14       Q.     During your time with the contract -- because
15   you would have been there from June 9th of 2012 up
16   until the point when my client was terminated;
17   correct?
18       A.     Correct.
19       Q.     So, during that time, did you ever meet with
20   any representative of Robertson Electric?
21 A. I talked to people that were doing the work
22   out there periodically.
23       Q.     Who?
24 A. I don't remember.     You know, they had -- they
25   were electricians.      I don't know if they were subs --

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            29

1    subcontractors or direct employees of Robertson
2    Electric.
3        Q.   Did you ever meet Mr. Robertson?
4        A.   No.
5        Q.   Never sent him any correspondence?
6        A.   No.
7        Q.   Ever call him on the phone?
8        A.   No.
9        Q.   So, it would be reasonable, then, for me to
10   state that during the time period from Mr. Robertson's
11   time on the contract until he was terminated -- or his
12   business terminated, that you never spoke to him?
13       A.   Correct.
14       Q.   Never wrote to him?
15       A.   Correct.
16       Q.   So, during that time span, then, it would be
17   reasonable for me to say that there was never a
18   complaint that you register with him?
19 A. I never registered a complaint with
20   Robertson.
21       Q.   At all?
22       A.   At all.
23       Q.   Okay.   Now, with regard to -- I want to go to
24   Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 5.     Now, on January 2nd of
25   2012, my client made some inquiry about the status of

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               30

1    a change order.    There was a change order that takes
2    place in December; isn't that correct?
3 A. I'm assuming.    Yes, that's correct.    There
4    was -- let me rephrase that.    We didn't issue a change
5    order.
6        Q.   No, you didn't.
7        A.   No.
8        Q.   In fact, as I understand it, there were
9    changes that were made to the underlying contract that
10   Mr. Robertson for REI indicated that weren't in the
11   original draft; isn't that correct?
12 A. I don't know that.
13       Q.   And isn't it also correct that, based upon
14   those changes which were not in the original draft, he
15   then sends out a request for a change order based upon
16   those changes that are in the -- in the contract -- I
17   mean, in a draft he's now in possession of?
18       A.   Well, that -- let me digress.      I know that
19   there was a -- there was a proposed change.      Okay.
20   There was a proposed change issued by the architect to
21   add some additional circuitry and add some additional
22   electrical work.    I'm not sure I follow what you're
23   talking about as far as changes that were made.     Those
24   -- that's the only specific change that was made and
25   at issue.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               31

1        Q.     But what I really want to make certain of is
2    that you were dealing with the representative for SBS;
3    isn't that correct?
4        A.     Yes.
5        Q.     And it indicates that on January 2nd, you're
6    out there at the site -- it indicates that you go to
7    the site on January 2nd; isn't that correct?
8 A. I don't see where it says that I'm on site.
9        Q.     Go to the top.
10       A.     Again, I don't see where it says that I'm on
11   -- on the site.
12       Q.     Read up here, please.
13       A.     (Witness complying.)    "Jerrod, we're
14   scheduled to have a meeting with the client this
15   Friday to review all outstanding issues/change orders.
16   Hopefully we'll get something finalized during this
17   meeting because your change order will be discussed at
18   that time.   At this time client rep was out late this
19   afternoon and, generally speaking, he's satisfied with
20   the conduit installation thus far.      It doesn't mention
21   my name.
22       Q.     Okay.   You're the client's rep, aren't you?
23 A. I am one of them.
24       Q.     Okay.   The contract that you have with SBS,
25   you are the designated client rep?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              32

1        A.   Am I?
2        Q.   Are you aware of that?
3        A.   No.
4        Q.   Okay.    Let's go to that contract so that we
5    can remove any ambiguity.    That should be Exhibit 15.
6    On Exhibit 15, subparagraph section 15.3, page 11, see
7    at the very bottom where it says, "owner's
8    representative"?
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   Who does it say it is?
11       A.   That's me; Thomas Pittman.
12       Q.   So, it would appear you're the rep that he's
13   talking about; right?
14       A.   Yes.
15       Q.   And you do recall having conversations with
16   -- is it Kieke?
17       A.   Kyle.
18       Q.   Kyle?
19       A.   Yeah.
20       Q.   Is it Kieke?
21 A. I don't know.
22       Q.   Okay.    And as a matter of fact, if you go to
23   Plaintiff's Exhibit 19-D, which are the SBS daily fuel
24   reports, where it indicates inspections and testing
25   visitors that date at the site.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               33

1        A.     Uh-huh.
2        Q.     It shows you're there, doesn't it?
3        A.     Yes.
4        Q.     So, does that help refresh your memory as
5    to --
6        A.     Yeah.   I see there's one electrician on the
7    site, too.
8        Q.     So, that helps refresh your memory as to --
9        A.     Yeah.
10       Q.     -- that you were there; correct?
11       A.     Yeah.   I was there.
12       Q.     All right.    And he accurately represents that
13   you had no problem with the conduit installation;
14   correct?
15       A.     Well, I didn't go and physically, I mean,
16   examine the conduit.      I mean, I saw them installing
17   conduit with one electrician.
18       Q.     Now, on Exhibit 19-D, it indicates the work
19   that Robertson Electric was doing that day; correct?
20       A.     Yes.
21       Q.     It says pulling wires, conduit, those type of
22   things; correct?
23       A.     "Pull wire for overhead lighting conduit.
24   Install conduit drops for emergency wall lighting,
25   continue CMU wall construction."

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               34

1           Q.   That's what you saw going on; right?
2 A. I believe so.
3           Q.   You didn't go up there and tell them to stop?
4           A.   No.
5           Q.   You're doing it wrong?
6           A.   No.
7           Q.   All right.   On Exhibit 19-N, this is a weekly
8    report for SBS.     Now, it indicates that there were no
9    project issues this week; right?       Mr. Pittman?
10 A. I'm reading.
11          Q.   Oh, okay.
12          A.   Okay.   I'm sorry.   What was the question?
13          Q.   There are no project issues indicated for
14   this week; correct?
15          A.   On this report.
16          Q.   That's correct.   None indicated for my
17   client; correct?
18          A.   Again, this is a weekly report submitted by
19   SBS.
20          Q.   I understand.   So, the purpose of these
21   reports is to communicate a history of what is going
22   on at the site; correct?
23 A. I would assume.
24          Q.   Okay.   And you're looking at this, and I
25   guess I'm trying to figure out, did you talk to

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            35

1    anybody at SBS saying that there was a problem that
2    week with my client?
3 A. I don't remember.     I know that I did speak to
4    SBS about Robertson Electric.
5        Q.   We'll talk about that in a few moments.
6    Let's go to week-ending -- let's go to 19-O.    You
7    would agree with me again for this week, there are no
8    problems identified; correct?
9        A.   Well, there's a paragraph here that says
10   "project issues."    It says, "We'll address all
11   outstanding issues during the scheduled meeting of 7
12   of January."   And outstanding issues -- we'll address
13   all outstanding issues.     I don't know what those
14   outstanding issues could be.     That's kind of an
15   open-ended question.
16       Q.   And that is for January 6th of 2013; correct?
17       A.   This -- yes.
18       Q.   Okay.   You know who John Grable is; correct?
19       A.   Correct.
20       Q.   And who was he?
21       A.   Project architect.
22       Q.   And in that capacity as a project architect,
23   it would be his responsibility to oversee -- if there
24   were problems, start with those problems; correct?
25       A.   No, that's not correct.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            36

1        Q.   Okay.   What would he do?
2        A.   Well, it depends on what his contract is.
3        Q.   Okay.   Well, you're the one dealing with him.
4    What did he do for you?
5        A.   What did he do for me?      He's a project
6    architect.   He also had -- at the time he was going to
7    act as the -- or assisting in construction management.
8        Q.   Okay.   So, he's assisting in project
9    management, so he's overseeing and making certain that
10   things are happening the way they're supposed to
11   happen; right?
12 A. I don't know that.
13       Q.   Okay.   Let's go to Exhibit 24-B.
14 A. Is there a tab that says "B" or just --
15       Q.   Go here.
16       A.   Okay.
17       Q.   That's Mr. Grable approving a draw
18   application; correct?
19 A. I believe so.     I can't really see -- is that
20   for draw application number 6?
21       Q.   That's correct.     What he expressed and writes
22   is that the electrical rough-in is underway and real
23   progress is underway.     Isn't that what he writes?
24       A.   Yeah.   He's referencing that because there
25   had been no progress prior to that time.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 37

1        Q.     And I want you to -- to note the exact daily
2    weekly report he addresses.      It's 19-O; isn't that
3    correct?
4 A. I'm trying to read this.     It -- the copy is
5    very blurred and smudged.
6        Q.     Do you want me to help you?
7        A.     No.    I'm getting through it.
8        Q.     All right.
9        A.     Okay.    What was the question?
10       Q.     The exact report -- weekly report he's
11   referring to is Exhibit 19-O; isn't that correct?
12       A.     Yes.
13       Q.     And based off that, what he's saying is,
14   everything is underway.      Everything appears to be
15   good; right?
16       A.     Yeah.
17       Q.     And if you look at the very bottom of that,
18   you get a CC?
19       A.     Uh-huh.
20       Q.     So, that would have been your time then to
21   say, well, that's not what I think is correct; right?
22       A.     That -- yeah, I would assume.
23       Q.     But you don't do that, do you?
24       A.     No.
25       Q.     Okay.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               38

1 A. I mean, I don't know that I don't do that.      A
2    lot of my communication and -- as the construction
3    manager for Rod Lewis would be ultimately to review
4    all the pay applications regardless of what the
5    architect said.
6        Q.    Okay.    A lot of your communication is oral;
7    right?
8        A.    Some of it is.
9        Q.    Well, a few moments ago you indicated that
10   you had a conversation with SBS; correct, about my
11   client?
12 A. I did.
13       Q.    You didn't put it in writing, did you?
14 A. I don't believe to.
15       Q.    Okay.    So, you didn't write to them saying
16   whatever concern you allegedly had with Robertson
17   Electric; correct?
18       A.    You know, that was a long time ago.   I don't
19   remember.   I'm sure I -- I had some correspondence via
20   e-mail.
21       Q.    Well, you would agree with me that if you had
22   correspondence via e-mail; right --
23       A.    Right.
24       Q.    -- it would exist; right?
25       A.    Yes.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 39

1        Q.     And certainly your lawyers would have it;
2    right?
3 A. I assume.
4        Q.     And if I represent to you that no such
5    communication has been turned over, then it would tend
6    to suggest that it doesn't exist; right?
7        A.     Okay.
8        Q.     So, if there is no e-mail from you at all to
9    SBS concerning Robertson Electric, then your earlier
10   representation that it could have been in -- via
11   e-mail would be incorrect, wouldn't it?
12       A.     Well, like I said, I -- I haven't gone
13   through all this documentation.        If you're saying that
14   there is no e-mails that exist between myself and SBS
15   regarding Robertson Electric, then I'm assuming that's
16   correct.
17       Q.     Now, when I reviewed Mr. Grable's letters,
18   Exhibit 24-A and Exhibit 24-B concerning my client, he
19   expressly states electrical rough-in is underway and
20   real progress is underway.       That's what he writes in
21   both instances; correct?
22       A.     Correct.
23       Q.     Now, on Exhibit 24-B, it has the date of
24   January 21st -- I mean, of December 21st, but that's
25   obviously incorrect, because it references the weekly

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               40

1    report of January 6th.     So, it couldn't reference a
2    report on the 21st that didn't exist until after that
3    document was drafted; correct?
4        A.     Assuming that it was issued on the 4th of
5    January.
6        Q.     Now, Exhibits 19-A through 19-L include the
7    following dates:   December 18th, 2012; December 19th,
8    2012, December 20th, 2012; January 2nd, 2013;
9    January 3rd, 2013; January 4th, 2013; January 7th,
10   2013; January 8th, 2013; January 15th, 2013;
11   January 21st, 2013; January 22nd, 2013; and
12   January 23rd of 2013.      Those are the daily reports
13   from SBS.   And in each and every one of those daily
14   reports, there is not one indicated problem with
15   Robertson Electric.   Were you aware of that?
16       A.     No, I wasn't.    But after looking at these
17   daily reports, it's telling me that there's one
18   electrician on the site.
19       Q.     Okay.
20       A.     There's two electricians, at best.    That's
21   problematic on a job this size.
22       Q.     It's funny you should say that.    Because as I
23   understand it, during this time frame, there is trench
24   work that's supposed to be done and --
25       A.     What kind of trench work?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  41

1        Q.   -- curbing that's supposed to be done.
2        A.   What's that?    Trench work?   What kind of
3    trench work?
4        Q.   We're going to get to that.        We're going to
5    get to that.   But those documents don't show any
6    complaint; correct?
7 A. I don't see anything.
8        Q.   Okay.    Now, Exhibits 19-M through 19-Q are
9    the weekly reports.   And these are December 23rd,
10   December 30th, January 6th, January 13th, and
11   January 30th of 2013.    And those likewise show
12   absolutely no complaint or problem?
13       A.   Well, I find it highly unusual if a -- if a
14   general contractor is going to write all his
15   complaints on a weekly report.
16       Q.   Maybe.
17       A.   Yeah.    I mean, I doubt if a general
18   contractor is going to put, I'm really having a
19   problem with the electrician or, I'm really having a
20   problem with my stone guy.    You know, so, to say that
21   these project issues aren't identifying a problem with
22   Robertson Electric is kind of -- I don't know how
23   that's relevant.
24       Q.   So, what you're saying is, they should have
25   been like you; right?    Not have documentation, but say

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               42

1    there was a problem.    Is that what you're saying?
2        A.   No, that's not what I'm saying.
3        Q.   Okay.   Because I want to be certain.    You're
4    contesting documentation and you're saying, well,
5    they're not going to document --
6 A. I'm not consisting it.     I'm just reading
7    what's here.
8        Q.   Okay.
9        A.   And there's very little here.      There is --
10   when you have project issues and you've got one
11   sentence that says, we'll address all outstanding
12   issues, what does that mean?
13       Q.   Well, I believe when your architect goes
14   back and says everything is fine, then -- and
15   you indicated --
16       A.   And as an architect, he's not going to go,
17   boy, I'm really having a problem with the general
18   contractor.
19       Q.   So, what you're saying, then, is that the
20   general architect --
21       A.   A general architect?     What is that?
22       Q.   I mean -- excuse me.     The architect who was
23   on this site with Mr. Grable, he didn't indicate to
24   you that he had any problems with my client; correct?
25       A.   Not that I remember.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              43

1        Q.   And so -- and he didn't put anything in
2    writing to you about any problems he was having; is
3    that correct?
4        A.   That's correct.
5        Q.   Okay.    Now, did you take any pictures?
6        A.   Did I take picture?
7        Q.   Yes.
8 A. I don't believe so.
9        Q.   Okay.    So, the pictures that my client does
10   take would indicate what the site was like when he was
11   there; correct?
12 A. I don't know.    I've never seen any pictures
13   that your client took.
14       Q.   Okay.    Have you seen Exhibit 27?
15       A.   Okay.
16       Q.   Did you examine them?
17 A. I've looked at the first page.     I didn't know
18   there was more.   Some of these are reproductions of
19   the same picture over and over again.
20       Q.   Okay.    These are pictures of the site; the
21   work, equipment, and supplies that are at that site.
22   Did you ever go to the site and see the wall?
23       A.   See the wall?
24       Q.   See the wall, where the electrical work was
25   being done.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            44

1        A.   Yeah.
2        Q.   That's what it looked like, didn't it?
3        A.   Yeah.
4        Q.   Okay.
5        A.   There was a whole bunch of walls.   Are you
6    referring to one of the walls or all of the walls?
7        Q.   Those pictures accurately represent what my
8    client did up until the 23rd of January --
9        A.   No.
10       Q.   -- of 2013?
11       A.   No, they don't.
12       Q.   So, you're saying the camera is lying, too?
13       A.   No.   I'm saying you're taking one picture --
14   two pictures -- a lot of these are duplicates of the
15   same thing.
16       Q.   Okay.
17       A.   But they don't accurately depict all of the
18   electrical work.
19       Q.   And you --
20 A. If that's what you're asking me.    You're
21   asking me if one wall is indicative of all of the
22   work, and I'm saying, no, it's not.
23       Q.   As a matter of fact, that's not what I said.
24       A.   Okay.
25       Q.   What I said was --

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   45

1        A.     You did say the wall --
2                      THE COURT:   Wait.   Y'all don't overtalk
3    each other.      She can't type it down.
4                      THE WITNESS:   I'm sorry.
5                      MR. BROWN:   I'll stop.
6        Q.     (BY MR. BROWN)      What those -- I represented
7    those pictures were of the site that Mr. Robertson
8    did, and they were indicative of what Robertson
9    Electric did.      Isn't that what I said?
10 A. I believe so.
11       Q.     And that's what those pictures represent;
12   correct?
13       A.     Yes.
14       Q.     And you don't have any pictures of what you
15   took; correct?
16       A.     No.
17       Q.     Okay.    So, again, your memory that you -- a
18   few moments ago was a little hazy, you were going back
19   and saying, well, that really wasn't it?        Is that what
20   you're saying?
21 A. I'm sorry?
22       Q.     A few moments ago when we were going -- you
23   know, I was asking you some questions, you appeared to
24   be having some problems with your memory.
25       A.     No.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  46

1           Q.   Okay.
2 A. I wasn't.
3           Q.   Now, Exhibit 19-Q is the weekly report from
4    SBS.    And on the project issues, it says, the
5    electrical subcontractor status.        That was an issue.
6    You see that?
7           A.   Uh-huh.
8           Q.   Is that because on January 14th, you told SBS
9    that you needed to make a change?
10 A. I don't remember the date, but yeah, I told
11   SBS we needed to make a change.
12          Q.   And that occurs on the 14th of January of
13   2013; correct?
14 A. I don't recall.
15          Q.   When -- the process for doing bids --
16          A.   What kind of -- doing bids?
17          Q.   Electrical bids.
18          A.   Yeah.
19          Q.   Is the normal course to have somebody examine
20   the work that needs to be done and then they bid on
21   that work?
22 A. I'm sorry.    I don't really follow you.   The
23   standard course of action is to issue contract
24   documents to electricians, have them vet the
25   electrician, get a price from the electrician.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                47

1        Q.   Okay.
2        A.   That's standard procedure.
3        Q.   So, you would agree then that the providing
4    of documents is what you would provide to --
5 A. I'm the owner's rep.     I'm not the general
6    contractor.   I would assume the general contractor
7    provides the electrical contractor with the necessary
8    documents.
9        Q.   So, then, it would be the general contractor
10   that then does the vetting in looking for --
11       A.   Right.    We don't -- as a construction manager
12   for the owner, I'm not managing the subcontractors.
13       Q.   Okay.    So, you're not going out there looking
14   to find subcontractors; correct?
15 A. I'm not sure I really understand you.
16       Q.   Well --
17       A.   What do you mean, I'm not going out and
18   looking to find subcontractors?
19       Q.   Uh-huh.
20       A.   That -- that can happen.     If I see a problem,
21   if I identify a certain trade as having a problem, I
22   can -- I can go in and say, hey, I want to price this
23   or I want to look at optional pricing.      I don't have
24   to do that through a certain electrician.
25       Q.   Okay.    And the process for doing that would

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            48

1    be, then, that you then submit them the documents for
2    them to review first?
3        A.   Who is them?
4        Q.   Whoever you're going to consider.
5        A.   Yeah.   That's safe to say.
6        Q.   Okay.   So, you would then send out documents
7    first to whomever you're going to consider; correct?
8 A. I'd assume.
9        Q.   And then that individual would then tender a
10   bid or a proposal based upon that; correct?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   And then you would then act upon that?
13       A.   Well, if I gave them notice of receipt or if
14   I issued them a contract.     He's not going to act upon
15   it independent of giving -- without giving a notice to
16   proceed or a contract.
17       Q.   Did you, in fact, provide C&S Enterprises a
18   copy of the work -- a packet, as you would say, for
19   them to consider before you recommended them?
20 A. I -- absolutely I did.
21       Q.   Where is it?
22       A.   The packet that you're referring to is -- was
23   a change order that was issued by the architect -- a
24   proposed change for additional work to the contract.
25   Not the subcontractor, Robertson Electric, but the

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  49

1    contract that SBS had.      Okay.   And most of -- the
2    majority of that was electrical work.         And the only
3    reason I did that with C&S is because the price I got
4    back from Robertson Electric was extremely high.
5        Q.     Well --
6        A.     And it was my -- it was under my prerogative
7    that I can take that and have another electrician look
8    at that.
9        Q.     I want to be certain I understand what you're
10   saying.    Because the only -- the only document you got
11   back from Robertson Electric addressed a change order;
12   correct?
13       A.     Proposed change.
14       Q.     Right.    And that was it.   And then based upon
15   that one little narrow area of change order, you then
16   recommended --
17 A. It was almost -- it was -- it wasn't one
18   little narrow change order.      The first change order I
19   got from Robertson Electric was $60,000.00.        That was
20   almost -- that was a quarter -- more than a quarter of
21   the whole subcontract amount.
22       Q.     Okay.
23       A.     That was when I went, you know, there's a
24   problem here.
25       Q.     Okay.    Now, when you did that, okay, that was

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 50

1    on that one area of the change order; correct?
2 A. I think that was the area of the change
3    order.
4        Q.     Okay.
5        A.     Not one area.
6        Q.     And based upon that -- based upon that
7    section, you then recommend the termination of an
8    entire contract?
9        A.     No, that's not true.
10       Q.     Let's go -- let's look at --
11       A.     After the review of C&S's number, I did.
12       Q.     Let's look at Exhibit 29, please.
13       A.     (Witness complying.)
14       Q.     Now, Exhibit 29 is an e-mail.       And on January
15   14th at 3:54, you send Jack Green -- Jack Green is
16   with SBS; correct?
17       A.     Yes, sir.
18       Q.     Okay.   And you send him the following.     It
19   says, "Give me a call about the electrician."
20   Correct?
21       A.     Correct.
22       Q.     He said, "I'm going into a meeting now and
23   should be out by 4:45 p.m."       Correct?
24       A.     Correct.
25       Q.     Okay.   Now, attached to that is the proposal.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    51

1        A.     There's nothing -- there's no attachment on
2    this e-mail.     So, there's -- but that was not attached
3    to this.
4        Q.     That's what I got.
5        A.     Okay.   It's just another proposal.      It's not
6    attached -- there's no attachment.         But yeah.   Okay.
7        Q.     And the entire contract for my client is
8    being bidded out; correct?
9        A.     No.   I sent over the plans and specifications
10   for the hangar for a comparable bid.
11       Q.     Well, if all you sent over was a comparable
12   bid for the change order -- that's what you're saying?
13       A.     No.   No.    I sent over all of the documents
14   for the electrical side.        Because I'm getting a
15   comparable price.       Okay.   Now, here is -- for the same
16   work, $76,000.00.       And then I also send over a
17   proposal for the change order.         So, what I'm trying to
18   do is not just get the change order price.        I'm trying
19   to get a full magnitude of what the original contract
20   is --
21       Q.     Correct.
22       A.     -- and what the add is.
23       Q.     And so, the original contract and the add on
24   the proposal that's provided was $72,000.00; correct?
25       A.     No.   This was $76,000.00.

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  52

1        Q.     Okay.    $76,486.75; correct?
2        A.     For the first order of magnitude, which was
3    the first work.
4        Q.     Okay.    We're going to get back to this.    Now,
5    going back to Exhibit Number 5, in my client's e-mail
6    on January 8th, he's talking about the easement and
7    underground matters; correct?
8        A.     Well, I'm on the fourth page.      You said the
9    third page.    But this is January 8th?
10       Q.     Uh-huh.
11       A.     Okay.
12       Q.     And he is being told by Mr. Kieke that the
13   owner foreman isn't going to allow the easement or
14   underground situation to continue and it's placed on
15   hold; right?      Do you see that?
16       A.     Yes.
17       Q.     That's true; right?
18 A. I don't know.    I don't know who the owner's
19   foreman is.
20       Q.     Okay.
21       A.     Because there's another owner's foreman out
22   there.
23       Q.     There was an easement problem; correct?
24 A. I don't remember.    The easement wasn't a
25   problem.   What we were trying to do was to bring in

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 53

1    three-phase power.
2        Q.     Uh-huh.
3        A.     So, there was never a problem.     I mean, the
4    site is a ranch that we can establish easement
5    wherever you want it.      The easement -- the electrical
6    easement was for the feed coming in off the main
7    power.   We always wanted to try to get three-phase
8    power.   We had single-phase, so what we were trying to
9    do in this process was to get three-phase.      We found
10   out from the electrical provider that three-phase was
11   too far down the road, so we were just going to go
12   with the single-phase.
13       Q.     Right.    But it hadn't been done; right?   The
14   owner was withholding permission to do the work;
15   correct?
16 A. It says, "The owner's foreman isn't going to
17   start until his boss gives him the go-ahead."      And was
18   the owner's -- was the easement part of Robertson's
19   scope of work?
20       Q.     Sir, let's go to Exhibit 19-M.
21       A.     "M"?
22       Q.     "M."   Look where it says on project issues.
23   It expressly reads, "Need status of electrical
24   easement to begin utility work."
25       A.     Uh-huh.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             54

1        Q.   So, SBS is clearly indicating, in order for
2    things to continue going forward, that has to change;
3    right?
4        A.   No.    Let me -- let me --
5        Q.   Sir --
6        A.   -- qualify something.     The electrical
7    easement isn't part of an critical path.
8        Q.   And then right below there it says, "Need
9    status of electrical change approval."      See that?
10       A.   Yes.
11       Q.   Both of these things are still up in the air,
12   and that's seven days earlier -- matter of fact,
13   almost a week earlier than the January 6th --
14       A.   The electrical easement wasn't part of a
15   critical path.
16       Q.   Okay.
17       A.   The electrical easement became an issue when
18   we decided that we would try to bring in three-phase,
19   which is a much more economical way to handle the
20   motors and things that -- that were going to be on
21   this project.
22       Q.   Now, I want -- the date on that particular
23   weekly report is December 23rd, 2012; correct?
24       A.   Yes.    That's what it says.
25       Q.   And the easement problem and/or excavation

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             55

1    issues are ongoing and continuing on the date that my
2    client is terminated, January 23rd of 2013; correct?
3        A.   Yes.
4        Q.   Okay.   Now, on Exhibit 19-I, which is dated
5    January 15th of 2013, that's the day after C&S submits
6    its bid -- its proposal; correct?
7 A. I don't remember what day C&S submitted its
8    proposal.
9        Q.   I'll represent to you that on the top of its
10   proposal, it's January 13th of 2013.
11       A.   Okay.   All right.
12       Q.   The following day is when they do their
13   walk-through.
14       A.   Who is they?
15       Q.   C&S.
16       A.   Okay.
17       Q.   You see it there?
18       A.   Yes.
19       Q.   So, before they do a walk-through to examine
20   the site, they've already presented to you what
21   they're going to do the work for?
22       A.   Correct.
23       Q.   Okay.   And again, we understand that price to
24   be $76,486.75; correct?
25       A.   That was for a full scope of the work.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   56

1        Q.     Uh-huh.
2        A.     Not the change order.
3        Q.     Well, what you indicated then was that you
4    submitted all that was before you at that time.
5    Because at the time that you submitted your report and
6    your requests to Robertson for Robertson Electric,
7    their change order and their contract were before you;
8    correct?
9 A. I had seen their change order.        The change
10   order was submitted to me.        I never saw their
11   contract -- their contract with SBS.          I may have
12   requested it.
13       Q.     But you don't know?
14 A. I don't remember.
15       Q.     Now, their proposal, again, is dated January
16   14th of 2013; right?
17       A.     Yeah.
18       Q.     And you --
19 A. I'm assuming you're correct.
20       Q.     Okay.    You had it.    It was in your hands.      It
21   was in your e-mail; right?
22       A.     Right.
23       Q.     Do you understand why it takes almost about a
24   year, a year plus before that document is ever
25   produced in discovery?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 57

1 A. I have no idea.
2        Q.     Okay.    Now, I want to go to Plaintiff's
3    Exhibit 22-A.      And I want to make certain, do you need
4    any sugar or anything?
5 A. I'm good.
6        Q.     All right.
7        A.     Thanks.
8        Q.     Now, on July 31st, 2013, the awarded contract
9    that was given to C&S wasn't 76,000; it was
10   $115,163.00.
11       A.     Well, this was way after I'm gone.        This was
12   July.    I'd been gone since March.     What transpired
13   after I left, I couldn't tell you.       There may have
14   been a whole bunch of change orders.          Who knows.
15       Q.     You don't know?
16 A. I don't know.
17       Q.     But they're clearly getting more than what
18   they said they'd do it for.
19       A.     Well, we're assuming we're talking about the
20   same scope of work.
21       Q.     Well, that would apply then as to Robertson,
22   too, that whatever you're submitting would be the same
23   scope of work.
24       A.     No, it wouldn't.
25       Q.     Oh, okay.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               58

1        A.   You're talking about something that could
2    evolve between when I left -- or when the original
3    project started.    The only thing we had to compare was
4    the original scope of work.     Okay.
5        Q.   Which was changing.
6        A.   Sure.
7        Q.   Okay.
8 A. It's like every project.       I mean, I don't
9    remember a single project not changing.
10       Q.   You'd agree with me that the difference
11   between the proposed amount and the stated contract
12   amount would be approximately $39,000.00?
13       A.   What -- I'm sorry.     I don't follow you.
14       Q.   The proposed amount is 76 --
15       A.   What proposed amount?
16       Q.   The proposed --
17       A.   C&S's proposed amount --
18       Q.   Correct.    January 14th --
19       A.   -- for the original scope of work?
20       Q.   Correct.    And the contract amount would
21   appear to be $39,000.00; correct?
22       A.   Which contract amount?
23       Q.   The contract amount that's referenced.
24       A.   The contract amount you're referencing on
25   July 31st?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    59

1          Q.   Yes.
2          A.   That's apples and oranges.
3          Q.   Oh, is it?
4          A.   Yes, it is.
5          Q.   Okay.    So, if it's apples and oranges, then
6    you would appear to be trying to hold my client, based
7    on your testimony, to oranges?
8          A.   No, no.
9          Q.   Oh, okay.
10         A.   No.    We're going back to the original scope
11   of work.
12         Q.   Okay.
13         A.   Months before this invoice, which has nothing
14   to do with Robertson Electric.       They've been gone for
15   months.    I've been gone for months.     What -- how this
16   contract amount evolved is academic.          Who knows what
17   changed.    I want to go back to the original contract
18   amount that Robertson had and that C&S gave us a price
19   on.
20         Q.   Uh-huh.   Now, Mr. Pittman, you indicate that
21   you submitted to C&S a bid.      Did that bid take into
22   consideration --
23 A. I didn't submit to C&S a bid.        I submitted --
24         Q.   Documents.
25         A.   -- documents.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              60

1        Q.    Okay.   Did those documents include the work
2    that my client had done?
3        A.    No.
4        Q.    Did it include the supplies they'd left
5    behind?
6        A.    No.
7        Q.    Did it include the gears and electrical
8    matters that were left behind?
9        A.    No.
10       Q.    So, if it doesn't, then if they include those
11   costs in items that were left behind and they have
12   been paid for them, but they were already there, then
13   somebody is --
14       A.    No.
15       Q.    -- pocketing money; right?
16       A.    No.   That's -- that's a wild imagination.
17   What C&S gave us a price on prior to seeing the site
18   was the contract documents.     The same contract
19   documents that Robertson gave us a price on -- or gave
20   SBS a price on.
21       Q.    Well, as I understand it, you never saw what
22   Robertson did; right?
23       A.    No.   I saw part of what Robertson did.
24       Q.    Well --
25 A. I was on the site.    I never said I never saw

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             61

1    what Robertson did.
2        Q.   So, what you're really saying is, well,
3    there's some stuff I saw --
4        A.   What do you mean I'm really saying?     I --
5    have I changed my opinion?
6        Q.   I don't know.
7        A.   Have I said two things?      Have I spoken out of
8    either side of my mouth?     You're trying to say what I
9    really said.   So, I'm not saying -- I've said exactly
10   what I said.
11       Q.   What you said was that the information that
12   you submitted included Robertson's work.
13       A.   No, I did not say that.
14       Q.   So, it didn't include it at all?
15       A.   Let me rephrase this, and hopefully you'll
16   understand it this time.
17       Q.   Help me.
18       A.   What they -- what we submitted to C&S was the
19   same contract documents that Robertson Electric had.
20   So --
21       Q.   That you never saw?
22       A.   No.   The plans and specifications that
23   Robertson gave us -- gave SBS a price is the same
24   documentation that C&S gave us a price to do.     So, we
25   had apples and apples.     We had the schedule of values

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  62

1    from Robertson Electric.     We had a schedule of values
2    from C&S Enterprises.     So, when I gave C&S Enterprises
3    a change order --
4        Q.    Uh-huh.
5        A.    -- to give us a price on, they're working off
6    the same pieces of papers.     They're working off the
7    same documents.
8        Q.    Okay.
9        A.    That was the whole purpose of giving them the
10   full scope of the work.
11       Q.    So, again, when Robertson leaves, it leaves
12   its electrical supplies on-site; right?
13       A.    They left some stuff on-site.      Yeah.   A lot
14   of it we couldn't use because it was wrong.
15       Q.    Oh, okay.
16       A.    But yeah.
17       Q.    And those were the same electrical supplies
18   that had been approved by both you and Mr. Grable?
19       A.    No.   I did not approve any submittals.
20       Q.    Now, you're indicating that, well, this was
21   wrong.   Did you ever tell anybody with SBS that the
22   supplies were wrong?
23 A. I never said that the supplies were wrong
24   until after we reviewed them.
25       Q.    And my question is, did you ever tell anybody

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            63

1    that they were wrong?
2        A.   No.
3        Q.   Okay.
4        A.   Not until after we had terminated them.
5        Q.   Now --
6        A.   We weren't out -- going out there checking --
7    I mean, that's the general contractor's
8    responsibility, is to check that the submittals and
9    the -- and the documentation that's submitted is
10   correct per the contract documents.     It's not my
11   responsibility.
12       Q.   Okay.    And I want to make certain -- because
13   I asked if you're licensed.    You're not a journeyman,
14   you're not an electrician, you don't have those type
15   of --
16       A.   Oh, no.
17       Q.   Okay.    So, you wouldn't be putting your
18   training against someone who is certified and has the
19   requisite licenses; correct?
20       A.   What do you mean putting it against?
21       Q.   You know, putting your knowledge in what is
22   required on the site and what the specs require
23   against someone who has that training.
24       A.   Oh, I do all the time.
25       Q.   And you think you're on par with somebody who

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              64

1    has the requisite skills and training?
2 A. I'm on par with architects, engineers,
3    professional people from every aspect of this -- of
4    construction.
5        Q.   Okay.   Now, on or about December 14th, Mr.
6    Robertson is going through the plans that he has and
7    notes that the plans that he has are different than
8    the original plans that he was provided.   Were you
9    aware of that?
10       A.   No.
11       Q.   And that the change-up in those plans
12   required a change order; correct?
13       A.   Yes.
14       Q.   Because if he's doing work that has -- off
15   the original plans that hasn't been approved, then
16   he's not going to get paid; right?
17       A.   That's not -- that's not my responsibility.
18   That's SBS's responsibility.
19       Q.   So, he then --
20       A.   What he was submitted by SBS, I don't know.
21       Q.   Okay.   Well, you just said you did know
22   because that's the same stuff you submitted --
23 A. I mean, how could I say what was submitted to
24   Robertson Electric?   Okay.   I'm not overseeing every
25   piece of paper that's submitted to them.   I mean, I

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                65

1    know that I have a certain set of documents that I'm
2    supposed to bill the project off of.        What they're
3    issued, I don't know.    How can I have control of that?
4        Q.   So, Exhibit Number 4-A begins the movement
5    with regard to the change order.     Now, that begins
6    December 14th of 2012; correct?
7 A. I'm getting there.
8        Q.   That's the first document where you're
9    indicating that the proposed change order is
10   $60,276.00; correct?
11       A.   We must be looking at a different thing.
12   This is -- okay.   We are looking at different things.
13   This is price requests RFP number 1 for 60,000.
14       Q.   Now, did you get that?
15 A. I saw a copy of this.     Yeah.
16       Q.   Did you respond to it?
17       A.   No.
18       Q.   So --
19 A. It's not my duty to respond to this.        I
20   respond to SBS.
21       Q.   Okay.    Did you respond to SBS?
22       A.   Yes.
23       Q.   In writing?
24 A. I don't know.
25       Q.   Did you tell them -- first, did you just tell

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  66

1    them it's too high?
2        A.    Oh, yeah.
3        Q.    Did you tell them why it was too high?
4        A.    No.    I mean, I looked at the scope of work
5    here --
6        Q.    Sir, my question is, did you tell them why it
7    was too high?
8        A.    No.
9        Q.    Okay.    So, you had said it's too high, but
10   you don't tell them why; correct?
11 A. I don't need to.    I can look at it and tell
12   you it's too high.
13       Q.    Okay.    Then on January 8th at 4-B, Mr.
14   Robertson resubmits, indicating there was an error
15   and the price quoted is 56,611.
16       A.    Uh-huh.
17       Q.    Did you ever see that?
18       A.    Yes.
19       Q.    Did you speak with SBS?
20 A. I'm sure I did.
21       Q.    My question is, do you know?       You think you
22   did or you --
23 A. I'm pretty sure I did.
24       Q.    Okay.    But you didn't in writing?
25 A. I don't know.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                67

1         Q.   Did you ever tell them what was wrong with
2    the alleged proposal or work that had to be done?
3         A.   Yes, I did.
4         Q.   Was it done in writing?
5 A. I don't know if it was or not.        I know a lot
6    of times I'll pick up the phone.      It's a lot quicker
7    than sending off an e-mail.
8         Q.   And again --
9         A.   But I think that the fact that Robertson
10   continues to try to adjust this price down is evidence
11   that I spoke to SBS that I felt the price was too
12   high.
13        Q.   Now --
14        A.   Why did they keep working this over and over?
15        Q.   And now, my question to you was, did you ever
16   put your -- you say you sent an e-mail; right?
17        A.   No, I didn't say I sent an e-mail.        I said a
18   lot of times I'll pick up the phone.         It's faster than
19   sending an e-mail.
20        Q.   Okay.    So, you didn't send an e-mail?
21 A. I kind of believe -- well, I don't know.        Did
22   I?
23        Q.   Sir, I can tell you that no e-mail has been
24   submitted to me from you.
25        A.   Then I didn't send an e-mail.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            68

1        Q.   Okay.   So, you spoke orally then?
2        A.   Yes.
3        Q.   Now, on January, I want to say, 21st, my
4    client submits the last of what he proposed that it be
5    done for.   Did you ever speak to him about what needed
6    to be done and why?
7        A.   Him, being Robertson Electric?
8        Q.   Robertson.   Yes.
9        A.   No.
10       Q.   Did you ever speak to SBS as to what needed
11   to be done and why?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   You're sure?
14       A.   Positive.
15       Q.   You know that two days after this, Robertson
16   is terminated; right?
17       A.   Yes.
18       Q.   And you know that on January 14th, you've
19   already indicated that there's going to be a change in
20   the electrician; right?
21       A.   Yes.
22       Q.   So, you're telling me that with the decision
23   made that you're going to replace somebody, you have
24   this in-depth conversation about the work they were
25   going to do; is that right?

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               69

1        A.     That's correct.
2        Q.     Okay.
3                   THE COURT:    Mr. Brown, let's take our
4    morning 15-minute break; okay?
5                   MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.
6                   THE COURT:    You can step down, Mr.
7    Pittman.   Let's take 15 minutes.
8                   (Recess taken.)
9                   MR. SLATES:   Your Honor, if we may
10   address an administrative issue before we resume.        We
11   were talking during the break.       Mr. Pittman is
12   obviously a key witness to all the parties.       He's been
13   subpoenaed by SBS and we obviously intend to ask
14   questions of Mr. Pittman as well.
15                  THE COURT:    Sure.
16                  MR. SLATES:   The question we raised is
17   whether the Court would prefer us, in the course of
18   his examination today, to cover everything with him or
19   does he need to be re-called by SBS and then re-called
20   by us?
21                  THE COURT:    I was -- after Mr. Brown,
22   then SBS, and then you examining.        If you can do
23   everything.
24                  MR. SLATES:   Can we cover -- obviously,
25   Mr. Brown is going to have topics that are specific to

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  70

1    Robertson.    You had instructed only to cover on cross
2    things that are covered on direct and then redirect.
3    But we would -- I think --
4                   THE COURT:    No.   Cross is wide open.   If
5    something is brought up on redirect is what I'm trying
6    to limit.
7                   MR. SLATES:    Okay.   Okay.   We just wanted
8    to get clarification that we can go ahead and go into
9    any topic with Mr. Pittman today.
10                  THE COURT:    Sure.
11                  MR. SLATES:    Okay.   Thank you.
12                  THE COURT:    Sure.    And somebody brought
13   up something about a computer or needing IT or
14   something like that?
15                  MR. SLATES:    We were just trying to
16   figure out how to throw an image up onto that
17   television.
18                  THE COURT:    I can -- well, normally you
19   can plug into that thing under the desk, which you've
20   tried already and it's not working?
21                  MS. BRAZELL:    Yes, Your Honor.    We could
22   not get it to come up.
23                  THE COURT:    Okay.    Maybe at lunch we can
24   bring another one over and then we can see if you can
25   get it running.   If not, I can see if I can find

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   71

1    somebody that can get it running.
2                    MS. BRAZELL:    Thank you.
3                    THE COURT:    Did you turn on the TV?
4                    MS. BRAZELL:    Yes.
5                    MR. SLATES:    We cycled through the
6    different inputs, but we couldn't get it to come up.
7                    THE COURT:    Okay.    And I'll get somebody
8    that uses it and we'll see if we can get y'all going.
9    But everybody, if they can, finish Mr. Pittman while
10   he's on the stand.    Okay.    Have a seat, Mr. Pittman.
11   Mr. Brown, you may proceed.
12                   MR. BROWN:    Thank you.
13       Q.   (BY MR. BROWN)       Now, Mr. Pittman, you
14   indicated in your direct in response to my questions
15   that the base contract would tend to flux; correct, it
16   would change?
17 A. I believe so.
18       Q.   That's what you said; right?
19       A.   (Witness nodding head up and down.)
20       Q.   So, on July 25th in Exhibit 22-A, the base
21   contract represents $115,163.00; correct?          In 22-B,
22   the base contract on November 11th, 2013 also
23   references 115,163.    You see that?
24       A.   What was that?       I'm sorry.   22-B?
25       Q.   22-B.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                72

1        A.   Yes.
2        Q.   What changes are the extras that occur;
3    right?
4        A.   Yes.
5        Q.   For example, in July you had extras at
6    $87,893.00; correct?
7        A.   No.
8        Q.   Don't you see it there?        It says extras
9    $87,893.00.    See?
10 A. I see extras to date 100,000.
11       Q.   No, no, no.       You're looking on 22-B.
12       A.   Okay.    Where am I supposed to be looking?
13       Q.   22-A.
14 A. I'm sorry.       Okay.
15       Q.   And in November, the extras represent the
16   $100,000.00 you indicated; right?
17       A.   Again, I'm looking at a document that's dated
18   July 31st of '13.      I'd been gone for several months.
19       Q.   Sir, I can appreciate it, but you're on the
20   stand.
21       A.   Okay.
22       Q.   Thank you.       Now, the extras --
23 A. Is that 87 or 27?
24       Q.   It's 87,893.
25       A.   Okay.    All right.      I'm sorry, but this is not

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                73

1    clear.
2           Q.   Now, we're at -- Exhibit 11-A an e-mail from
3    Mr. Sharples.       And it indicates that you had Mr.
4    Robertson or Robertson Electric terminated; correct?
5 A. 11-A?
6           Q.   Yes.    It's an e-mail.
7 A. It's from Daniel Boddie.
8           Q.   At the very top it says Daniel Boddie, then
9    next below that is Thomas Pittman, and then below that
10   is Weston Sharples.
11          A.   Okay.
12          Q.   Now, it accurately reflects that you had Mr.
13   Robertson -- or Robertson Electric terminated; right?
14   Sir?
15 A. I'm reading it.    I'm assuming.   It says I
16   need to get a fixture or device -- the value of the
17   fixtures that were left there for percentage complete
18   from C&S.
19          Q.   So, back in, it appears to be, June 7th of
20   2013, you're still with Mr. Lewis.        See that?
21          A.   Yes.
22          Q.   So, earlier when you were saying that you
23   were -- it was sometime in May, that obviously is not
24   true?
25          A.   Well, I'm trying to get my dates straight

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                74

1    here, because I resigned in March.      I still assisted
2    Mr. Lewis in certain things even though I was gone.
3        Q.   Well --
4        A.   But --
5        Q.   -- I want you to look at where it says in
6    that second paragraph it starts off with the 60,000
7    that they're claiming in their scheduled values for
8    the entire project.    It says, "Tom thinks that on the
9    date of termination, Robertson was no more than
10   25 percent done with their work."      Isn't that what it
11   says?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   It also says you're going to do an
14   investigation; right?
15       A.   Correct.
16       Q.   Did you do an investigation?
17       A.   We did.
18       Q.   Put it in writing?
19       A.   Yes.
20       Q.   So, there is an investigation that you
21   conducted in writing?
22       A.   Yes.
23       Q.   Where is it?
24 A. It's -- it's out there.
25       Q.   Where is it?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              75

1        A.   You know, I don't know where it is.    All I
2    know is I did a full forensic investigation of the
3    whole building; foundation, metal building,
4    structural, electrical, plumbing, the full gambit.      We
5    did a full gambit and it's documented.
6        Q.   And so, are you aware that as of this date,
7    no such investigation from you has been provided?
8        A.   No.
9        Q.   But you're claiming that it exists?
10 A. I know it exists.
11       Q.   You're positive?
12       A.   Positive.
13       Q.   Absolutely positive?
14       A.   Absolutely positive.
15       Q.   And so, when you left the employ of Mr.
16   Lewis, you left them that report?
17 A. I did.
18       Q.   Now, in the -- in Exhibit 29 you indicate
19   that, "We're going to make a change with the
20   electrician."    That's on January 29th -- excuse me --
21   on --
22 A. 14th.
23       Q.   Yes.    And the e-mail consistent with that is
24   recognizing that whatever termination is being done is
25   being done by you at the behest of Tri-Bar.    Is that

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              76

1    accurate?
2        A.   Yes.
3        Q.   And this was all oral; right?
4 A. I'm sorry?
5        Q.   This was oral?
6        A.   Yes.
7        Q.   Okay.    So, when you terminated Robertson
8    Electric --
9 A. I didn't terminate them.      SBS did.
10       Q.   I understand.     But you -- you told them to do
11   it; right?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   Okay.    Now, when you had it done, you hadn't
14   done your investigation; right?
15       A.   Correct.
16       Q.   So, you didn't know allegedly what reasons
17   you had; right?
18       A.   Well, the reason I had was for
19   nonperformance.
20       Q.   Well --
21       A.   We didn't discover discrepancies until
22   afterwards.
23       Q.   Okay.    So, what you're saying is, they were
24   being bad, but you didn't know how they were being
25   bad; right?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            77

1        A.   Well, I'm not sure I follow you.   I -- I know
2    that the electricians were not manning the job
3    properly.
4        Q.   Well, we understand that that's at least your
5    position; right?
6        A.   Well, even your daily reports substantiate
7    that.
8        Q.   What the daily reports reflect, sir, is that
9    there was work being done and we're going to address
10   what the reports show.
11       A.   Okay.
12       Q.   But what we do know is that at the time that
13   you made the termination suggestion/direction to SBS,
14   that all your supposed concerns were all oral; right?
15       A.   Right.
16       Q.   And we now know that there's some alleged
17   investigation that you did that existed sometime in
18   2013; right --
19       A.   Right.
20       Q.   -- that we've never seen?
21 A. I don't know if you've seen it or not.   We
22   did a report that identifies the discrepancies.
23       Q.   Now, did you ever look at Robertson
24   Electric's contract with SBS?
25 A. I don't believe I have.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 78

1           Q.   Never?
2           A.   Never.    I know what their schedule of value
3    was.    I know what the amount of contract was -- or let
4    me say, I assume I knew the amount of the contract
5    because it was in the scheduled values that was
6    submitted for weekly -- or for monthly draws.
7           Q.   So, we're talking about from the date of
8    incident, which was January 23rd, 2013 until today,
9    you've never looked at it?
10          A.   Yes.
11          Q.   So, at Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, page 9 through
12   10, there is a subparagraph section 8.06.      And
13   Robertson's contract expressly requires that any work
14   that it's going to do on work that it's submitted that
15   is not contained within the original plans has to be
16   submitted in a change order and has to be approved.
17   Did you know that?
18          A.   Well --
19          Q.   My first question is, did you know it?
20          A.   No.
21          Q.   Okay.    So, anything else you're going to say
22   after that is your suspicion; right?
23          A.   No.
24          Q.   Okay.    So, at least as between SBS and
25   Robertson Electric, they're sending you information

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            79

1    trying to get you to identify what it is that is
2    relevant that needs to be done with regard to this
3    change order, and the best you ever do is respond
4    orally.   Isn't that correct?
5 A. I have no responsibility to respond to
6    Robertson Electric.
7        Q.    The best you ever do --
8        A.    That's not -- my contract is not with
9    Robertson Electric.     It's with SBS.
10       Q.    But you could terminate them; right?
11       A.    Yes, I can.
12       Q.    Okay.   Now, have you ever looked at SBS's
13   contract with Tri-Bar?
14       A.    Yes.
15       Q.    Have you looked at section 7.1.1?
16 A. I'm not familiar with that paragraph.
17       Q.    Let's go to Plaintiff's Exhibit 17, page 21.
18       A.    (Witness complying.)
19       Q.    Section 7.1.1 expressly reads this.    "Changes
20   in work may be accomplished after execution of the
21   contract and without invalidating the contract."    You
22   see that?
23       A.    Yes, sir.
24       Q.    It would appear to me that this section
25   contemplates that there would be additional work, and

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  80

1    whatever concerns about that additional work would
2    need to be doesn't destroy, invalidate, or give reason
3    to terminate the underlying contract.         Right?
4    Correct?
5        A.     No.   It's not correct.    I mean, termination
6    -- this, to me, doesn't say anything about terminating
7    anybody.   This is talking about construction change
8    and construction directly.
9        Q.     So, invalidate, to you, means what?
10       A.     Well, I mean --
11       Q.     What does invalidate mean to you, sir?
12 A. I'm trying to answer that question.         You
13   know, that's -- that's not a yes or no answer.
14       Q.     I agree with --
15 A. Invalidating a contract could be a number of
16   things.
17       Q.     I'm sure inquiring minds want to know.
18       A.     Well, you could invalidate a contract by not
19   manning the project.
20       Q.     Uh-huh.
21       A.     Not properly meeting the schedules.
22       Q.     Uh-huh.
23       A.     Those are big ones.
24       Q.     Oh, I suppose they are.     But my question to
25   you is, when a contract is invalidated, I think this

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   81

1    section deals expressly with changes in work, doesn't
2    it?
3 A. It's part of it.
4          Q.   Sir, article 7, which leads that section,
5    says "changes in work."        Isn't that what it says?
6          A.   Yes, sir.
7          Q.   So, a change order deals with changes in
8    work; right?
9          A.   Correct.
10         Q.   Okay.   So, your other concerns that you
11   allege to be concerns would be within other sections
12   of the contract that address terminations for cause;
13   correct?
14         A.   Correct.
15         Q.   So, we're not talking about right now
16   termination for cause, are we?
17 A. I don't know.
18         Q.   No.   I expressly said section 7.      So, let's
19   stay a little focussed.        Now, your position that
20   you've stated a few moments ago that the additional
21   work that you wanted someone else to do -- that being
22   C&S -- would not serve as a basis or reason to
23   terminate Robertson Electric for a change order;
24   correct?
25                    MR. SLATES:    Objection, that

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   82

1    mischaracterizes the record.
2                 THE COURT:      Sustained.      Next question.
3        Q.   (BY MR. BROWN)     Now, let's go to 14.2, which
4    is on page 35.
5 A. 14 -- I'm sorry?      My pages aren't marked.
6    I'm sorry.
7        Q.   Now, this exact -- this section deals with
8    terminations for cause.     See it?
9        A.   Yes, sir.
10       Q.   It says that, "The owner may terminate for
11   cause if the contractor, one, repeatedly refuses or
12   fails to supply enough properly skilled workers or
13   proper materials."    Right?
14       A.   Correct.
15       Q.   Okay.   "Fails to make payment to
16   subcontractors."    Correct?
17       A.   Correct.
18       Q.   "Repeatedly disregards applicable laws,
19   statutes, et cetera."     Correct?
20       A.   Correct.
21       Q.   "And otherwise is guilty of substantial
22   breach of provisions of contract documents."         Right?
23       A.   Correct.
24       Q.   So, that's a for-cause termination; right?
25       A.   Correct.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                83

1        Q.   Correct?
2        A.   Yes, sir.
3        Q.   Now, that would seem to suggest that there
4    have to be repeated statements and concerns; right?
5        A.   Yes.
6        Q.   Now, your statement is that my client
7    supposedly didn't man it correctly; correct?
8        A.   Correct.
9        Q.   When?
10       A.   Throughout the job.
11       Q.   When?
12       A.   From day one.
13       Q.   When?
14       A.   From the beginning of the job.
15       Q.   When?
16       A.   They were notified several times -- SBS was
17   notified several times -- not only -- not only did
18   they not man the job --
19                   MR. BROWN:   Objection, nonresponsive.
20                   THE COURT:   He's asking if you know
21   specific dates that you remember when they were --
22                   THE WITNESS:   Every day.    Your Honor,
23   every date that I went there, every date that I saw
24   people from Robertson Electric, they never had a
25   hardhat on --

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    84

1                     MR. BROWN:      Mr. Pittman --
2                     THE WITNESS:      I'm trying to answer the
3    question.
4                     MR. BROWN:      Nonresponsive.
5                     THE COURT:      You're asking him when and
6    he's telling you the dates.
7                     MR. BROWN:      I'm asking him what date --
8                     THE WITNESS:      I would have to look
9    through my whole logs.         I mean, there was GPS on my
10   truck.      You could pull up when I was at that job,
11   which was several times every time I was there.
12          Q.    (BY MR. BROWN)     So, your testimony is
13   this    --
14          A.    And again, my --
15          Q.    Your testimony -- I'm trying to understand
16   your testimony -- is that there were these numerous
17   offenses that took place that you were orally making
18   these statements to SBS?
19          A.    Correct.
20          Q.    Correct?    That you don't independently have
21   any recollection of; right?
22 A. I don't remember the exact dates.     You're
23   asking for dates.        I don't remember the exact dates.
24          Q.    Would those have been contained in your
25   report -- your investigation?

                              TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                             PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            85

1        A.   No.
2        Q.   So, they weren't important enough to be put
3    in your investigation?
4        A.   No.
5        Q.   Okay.
6        A.   The investigation was after the fact.
7        Q.   Now, let's go to section 14.2.2.
8        A.   From 17 to 14?
9        Q.   It's on --
10       A.   Or section 14 --
11       Q.   It's on page 35.
12       A.   Okay.   I'm sorry.    Okay.
13       Q.   Section 14.2.2.
14       A.   Okay.
15       Q.   And it reads, "When any of the above reasons
16   exist, the owner, upon certification by the initial
17   decision maker that sufficient cause exists to justify
18   such action, may, without prejudice to any other
19   rights or remedies, after giving the contractor and
20   the contractor surety, if any, seven days written
21   notice terminating employment."      Right?
22       A.   Correct.
23       Q.   Now, the initial decision maker under this
24   contract is John Grable; isn't that correct?
25 A. If we're looking at the same document that we

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               86

1    were referring to earlier, yes, sir.
2        Q.     Okay.   So, John Grable would have been the
3    individual who would have first been required to make
4    a certification; correct?
5        A.     Yes.
6        Q.     That didn't happen, did it?
7        A.     Not to my knowledge.
8        Q.     Okay.   Then the next thing that has to happen
9    is there must be seven written days notice; right?
10       A.     Yes, sir.
11       Q.     That didn't happen either, did it?
12       A.     No.
13       Q.     So, section 14.2.2 that expressly governs the
14   section you're dealing with as relates to my client,
15   and for that matter SBS, you are telling this Court
16   was not complied with?
17       A.     Correct.
18       Q.     Thank you.     As a matter of fact, there is
19   never any documented complaint against my client at
20   all in compliance with this section. Isn't that
21   correct?
22       A.     That's correct.
23       Q.     But it would have been very easy for you to
24   do it, wouldn't it?      Wouldn't it?
25       A.     To do what?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              87

1        Q.   To have gotten the certification.    It would
2    have been very easy.
3        A.   Yes.
4        Q.   Now, so that we know, section 1.1.8 of page 9
5    of this document expressly designates and defines the
6    initial decision maker; correct?
7        A.   Yes.
8        Q.   And then section 15.2.1 on page 37 expressly
9    states the architect will serve as the initial
10   decision maker; correct?
11       A.   Which section?    I'm sorry.
12       Q.   Section 15.2.1 on page 37.     Correct?
13       A.   Yes.
14       Q.   So, your alleged reason that would be a
15   for-cause alleged termination of my client that you
16   want to serve as some basis that he did whatever would
17   have to have been contained within a letter and
18   certification done by Mr. Grable; right?
19       A.   Yes.
20       Q.   Which does not exist; correct?
21       A.   To my knowledge, it does not.
22       Q.   So, the letters that we do have from Mr.
23   Grable say that Robertson Electric is performing the
24   way it's supposed to be performing; correct?
25       A.   No.

                       TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                      PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              88

1        Q.   Okay.
2 A. It says they're finally getting on track.       If
3    that's what you're saying performing as -- you know,
4    that's --
5        Q.   Now -- so, amid all your conversations, all
6    your alleged concerns, as relates to any contractual
7    basis that you have to have my client terminated for
8    cause does not exist; correct?
9        A.   No.    Not correct.
10       Q.   The contract specifically requires that it be
11   done by the initial decision maker, seven days notice.
12   You've already stated it doesn't exist.     So, you're
13   saying that you don't have to comply with the
14   contract?
15       A.   That's not what I'm saying.
16       Q.   Well, if the contract requires you to do
17   something, and you're saying that you don't have to do
18   it, then you're saying that you're above the contract.
19       A.   No.
20       Q.   Okay.   So, you agree you have to follow the
21   contract?
22       A.   Yes.
23       Q.   Okay.   Now, I want you to go to section -- of
24   Exhibit 17, page 9.   Because I must admit, my reading
25   of this has always been -- has always put me in a

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                89

1    quandary.    And it says this.    And it's Bates stamped
2    00245.   So, I want to make sure you're on that page.
3    You there?
4        A.    You said page 9?
5        Q.    It is Exhibit 17, page 9.
6 A. I'm on Exhibit 17, page 9.
7        Q.    Okay.   You see on the bottom -- or you see
8    the section that says, "The contract document shall
9    not be construed to create a contractual relation of
10   any kind"?   See that?
11       A.    No.   Which section is it?
12       Q.    That would be -- it should be section 1.1.2
13   of the contract.
14       A.    Okay.   I see that.
15       Q.    You see that?
16       A.    Yes, sir.
17       Q.    And it says that the Tri-Bar contract will
18   not create a contractual relationship of any kind with
19   a subcontractor.     Do you see that?
20       A.    No.   I'm trying to read it.        Yes, sir.
21       Q.    So --
22 A. It just says between the owner and a
23   subcontractor or a sub-subcontractor.
24       Q.    And my client is a subcontractor; correct?
25       A.    Correct.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  90

1        Q.   So, you asserted a right against my client
2    that you contractually did not have; right?
3        A.   No.
4        Q.   Okay.
5        A.   That's not -- go ahead.
6        Q.   Now, you would agree with me that whatever
7    concerns you may have had, you never voiced with my
8    client and you only orally tell SBS.         So, assuming SBS
9    says that didn't happen, then my client never knows of
10   any alleged concern you have; right?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   But if this was such a big problem and you
13   have -- you're going to the site, you say, almost
14   daily; right?
15 A. I went there several times.
16       Q.   Oh, okay.    And if you could terminate them,
17   certainly you could go up to them and say, what's the
18   problem; right?
19       A.   Well, contractually, I'm not supposed to
20   carry on any kind of conversation with them.        And my
21   direct contact with them is through SBS.        And I'm not
22   going to contact Robertson Electric.
23       Q.   So, you could terminate them, but you can't
24   talk to them?
25       A.   Correct.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 91

1        Q.   Okay.    Now, you then proceeded on behalf of
2    Tri-Bar to obtain a substitute subcontractor to do the
3    work; correct?
4        A.   Correct.
5        Q.   Now, let's go to section 2.4 of the owner's
6    right to carry out work.
7        A.   What page is that?
8        Q.   I believe --
9                    THE COURT:   11.
10       Q.   (BY MR. BROWN)      It would appear to me that in
11   the very middle, it says, "If a contractor defaults
12   and neglects to carry out work," which is what you're
13   claiming happened; right?
14       A.   Which section?      I'm sorry.
15       Q.   2.4.    Owner's right to carry out the work.
16       A.   All right.
17       Q.   That if that is what is going to happen, and
18   that's what you're claiming happened; right?
19       A.   Yes, sir.
20       Q.   Okay.    Then it says, "Written notice from the
21   owner to commence and continue correction of such
22   default or neglect has to be done."       Right?   That's
23   what this section requires.
24       A.   Well, I think this section is between the
25   owner and the contractor; not the subcontractor.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                92

1        Q.    So, you stepped in, had my client
2    terminated -- you, on behalf of the owner; right,
3    obtained a subcontractor; right?
4        A.    Correct.
5        Q.    That means you are carrying out the work
6    because you're the one doing it.       SBS didn't do it;
7    right?
8        A.    Correct.
9        Q.    And this requires that there be written
10   notice.   Do you see that?
11       A.    Yeah.
12       Q.    You didn't do it, did you?
13       A.    No.
14       Q.    John Grable didn't do it, did he?
15       A.    No.
16       Q.    Mr. Lewis didn't do it, did he?
17       A.    No.
18       Q.    All right.     But there's no question that you
19   then assumed the control over my client's contract
20   when you had him terminated?
21       A.    Yes, sir.
22       Q.    And when you do that, at paragraph 5.4.2,
23   this is what your SBS/Tri-Bar contract says.      It says,
24   "When the owner accepts the assignment of a
25   subcontract agreement, the owner assumes the

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                93

1    contractor's rights and obligations under the
2    contract."   Do you see that?
3 A. I'm trying to get there.       Is that page 20 --
4    5.4.2?
5        Q.   Yes.    Do you see that?
6        A.   Yes, sir.
7        Q.   So, at that point when you did what you did
8    and you assumed control over the contract, you stepped
9    into the shoes of SBS for my client.        Did you
10   understand that?
11                   MR. SLATES:    Objection.   That assumes
12   evidence not in the record.      There's no record that
13   Tri-Bar ever took assignment of Robertson's contract.
14                   THE COURT:    Legal objection?
15                   MR. SLATES:    Assumes facts not in
16   evidence.
17                   THE COURT:    Okay.   Overruled.
18       Q.   (BY MR. BROWN)       You see that, don't you?
19       A.   Uh-huh.
20       Q.   That's what happened, didn't it?
21       A.   No, that's not what happened.
22       Q.   Okay.    Now, it appears to me that the
23   proposal from C&S was written for basically 76,000;
24   that it's written as a contract for basically 115,000.
25   Right?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               94

1        A.     No.
2        Q.     That is the proposal?
3        A.     That was the proposal.
4        Q.     Okay.   And the contract is written for
5    115,000?
6        A.     No, it's not.      Where is the contract written
7    for 115,000?
8        Q.     Let's go back to 22-A.     See where it says the
9    total contract amount?
10       A.     Yes.    115,163.
11       Q.     That's the total contract amount; right?
12       A.     That's the total contract amount on July the
13   31st.
14       Q.     Okay.
15       A.     That proposal that was submitted was for a
16   different scope of work.       Even after that, they're not
17   even close to what Robertson's original contract
18   amount was.
19       Q.     Now, in the draw section -- and it includes
20   the gear.   You see that; draw number 3 on page -- on
21   Exhibit 22-A?
22       A.     Yes.
23       Q.     And that gear packet, even borrowing the
24   loose numbers that you guys provided, is approximately
25   10 to $15,000.00.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 95

1        A.     You're -- you know, I remember this.     This
2    gear package has nothing to do with the original scope
3    of work.   This gear package -- their records is for a
4    totally new section of the hangar in support -- in
5    ancillary structure.      It has nothing to do with the
6    original scope.      So, you can't take this draw package
7    for gear that's done on a totally different aspect of
8    the building.
9        Q.     So, then, the gear and information that you
10   submitted to C&S upon which they based their contract
11   and/or proposal was not exactly the same as what was
12   submitted by Robertson; could it be?
13 A. I don't know how you're getting there.     I
14   really don't.
15                     THE WITNESS:   I'm sorry, Your Honor.
16       A.     But you're -- I've directly said that this is
17   apples and oranges.      What this references has nothing
18   to do with what the original scope of work was.       So,
19   why do you think that this was part of the original
20   scope of work?
21       Q.     (BY MR. BROWN)    Now, did you have opportunity
22   to review any documents for today's testimony?
23       A.     Yes.
24       Q.     What did you see?
25 A. I didn't foresee anything.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  96

1        Q.     What did you see?      What did you --
2        A.     Oh, what did I see?
3        Q.     Uh-huh.
4        A.     Basically, we didn't look at anything.        Very,
5    very little of Robinson Electric.        Mainly what I
6    looked at was old documentation from SBS, our reports,
7    whatnot.
8        Q.     Didn't happen to see your report?
9        A.     Yes.    I saw part of my report.
10       Q.     Not the complete report?
11 A. I don't know.     I saw part of my report.
12       Q.     Now, Exhibit 32 --
13 A. I don't have 32.     I got 31.
14       Q.     It's 32.
15       A.     Okay.
16       Q.     On November 28th -- I want to go to Tri-Bar
17   Exhibit TR-01833.      At the very bottom of that -- do
18   you see it?   Let me get you there.       Right here.
19   There's an e-mail from Mr. Lewis.        And this is what he
20   says.    "Looks like they're making progress.       Thanks
21   for the pics."     That is what he writes; right?
22       A.     Yes, sir.
23       Q.     Right above there, Mr. Grable -- I know he
24   tells them thanks for the pictures; right?
25       A.     Uh-huh.    Yes, sir.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                97

1        Q.     So, he sees them.     Right above it, Mr. Grable
2    writes, "Rod, on another note, hangar is beautiful and
3    fits well with the land.      Want this project to be fun
4    and exciting for you; not the way it has progressed
5    thus far with the P&B building delay."        You see that?
6        A.     Yes, sir.
7        Q.     One, nothing about my client at all; right?
8        A.     Right.
9        Q.     And it seems like everybody is happy about
10   the building; right?
11       A.     Well, yes.
12       Q.     Okay.
13       A.     That one sentence.
14       Q.     But when we go to 32 -- Exhibit 32 --
15       A.     Okay.
16       Q.     -- it says, "I'll go visit the project
17   myself."   This is Mr. Weigand.      "And I'll get with Tom
18   and John for a thorough review.       And we'll get a
19   handle on what's going on, and I'll get back to you."
20   That's November 25th; right?
21 A. I'm sorry.    You referenced 32, but which --
22       Q.     Tri-Bar Bates stamped TR-01835.
23       A.     Okay.    I'm sorry.   Okay.
24       Q.     Now, did they go into this e-mail with you?
25       A.     No.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                98

1        Q.   Okay.    So, on the 25th as well as on the 2nd
2    of November, there appear to be concerns that y'all
3    have; right?   Correct?
4        A.   Yes, sir.
5        Q.   You never put it in writing; right?
6        A.   To who?
7        Q.   You don't go in writing by Mr. Grable.       He
8    never does the certification he's required to do.
9    Right?
10       A.   Right.
11       Q.   Never sends anything to SBS saying, you're
12   doing this, in writing to them, you're being bad,
13   you're not complying with the contract.      Right?
14       A.   Right.
15       Q.   Never put anything in writing saying my
16   client is doing anything that he's not supposed to do;
17   right?
18       A.   Right.
19       Q.   But you claim that this has been going on for
20   no less than three months, and yet you never do
21   anything; right?
22 A. In writing.
23       Q.   At all with my client; right?
24       A.   Correct.
25                  MR. BROWN:    I pass the witness.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   99

1                     THE COURT:   Select Building, your
2    witness.
3                          CROSS-EXAMINATION
4    BY MR. CLARK:
5          Q.   Now, Mr. Pittman, I want to clear up just a
6    few things before I get into my examination.       You said
7    that you resigned in March of 2013; is that correct?
8 A. I want to say it was March.
9          Q.   Okay.   You're testifying under oath.      Is it
10   March or is it not March?
11 A. I believe it's March.    It may have been -- it
12   may have been April.     I don't remember exactly what
13   day it was.
14         Q.   Do you remember receiving a subpoena from my
15   office?
16         A.   No.
17         Q.   Do you remember signing a -- an affidavit
18   under oath regarding documents that you may or may not
19   have in your possession?
20         A.   No.
21         Q.   Let me hand you what I've marked as
22   Defendant's Exhibit 118.      And I'll ask you to turn to
23   the last page.
24         A.   Well, I just can't remember.      I'm looking at
25   it.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                100

1        Q.   Is that your signature on the last page?
2        A.   Yes, sir.    Yes, sir, it is.
3        Q.   Is that your signature on the last page?
4        A.   Yes, sir.
5        Q.   And you signed it before a notary?
6        A.   Yes.
7                    MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, at this time we
8    would offer Defendant's Exhibit Number 118.
9                    THE COURT:    Any objections to 118?
10                   MR. BROWN:    I have no objection.
11                   MR. SLATES:    No objection, Your Honor.
12                   THE COURT:    118 is admitted.   SBS's 118
13   is admitted.
14       Q.   (BY MR. CLARK)       Whose handwriting is on
15   Exhibit 118?
16 A. It's mine.
17       Q.   So, you filled this out and you just didn't
18   remember it?
19       A.   Yeah.    I just didn't remember it.
20       Q.   Okay.    Who was your attorney at the time?
21       A.   Actually, Mark Luitjen assisted me with that.
22       Q.   Okay.    And you know that I spoke with Mr.
23   Luitjen about this document as well; right?
24 A. I'm assuming you did.
25       Q.   Okay.    Let's look at the answer to question

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              101

1    number 14.   Because I really just want to establish
2    the timeline.    Can you tell me at that time when you
3    said that you resigned?
4        A.   Oh, it was May.
5        Q.   May 21st?
6        A.   Yes, sir.
7        Q.   Okay.    So, your earlier testimony about March
8    was --
9        A.   That was incorrect.     It was May.
10       Q.   Okay.
11 A. I just didn't remember the exact date.
12       Q.   Okay.    Now, the document that Mr. Brown
13   showed you a few minutes ago had an e-mail from you
14   that was dated in June and it came from
15   thomaspittman@lewisenergy.com --
16       A.   Correct.
17       Q.   -- in June.     How long did you continue to use
18   that e-mail address?
19 A. It couldn't have been very long at all.
20       Q.   After you -- after you resigned in May --
21   May 21st, how much longer was it?      Was it --
22 A. I'm surprised that -- well, because when I
23   left Lewis Energy, I left.     I turned in my badges.   I
24   turned everything in.
25       Q.   In fact, you turned in your -- your laptop,

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             102

1    your computer, and your Blackberry?
2        A.   Yes, sir.    Well, I didn't have a Blackberry.
3    It was an iPhone.
4        Q.   An iPhone.     And every bit of that stayed with
5    Lewis Energy; right?
6        A.   Yes, sir.
7        Q.   And all the e-mails that were on Lewis
8    Energy's server is still Lewis Energy; right?
9        A.   Right.
10       Q.   The report that you referenced is still at
11   Lewis Energy; right?
12       A.   Correct.
13       Q.   And so, in answer to that subpoena when I
14   asked if you had any documents related to this
15   project, you said that you had none; right?
16       A.   Correct.
17       Q.   Now, a minute ago you said -- you started
18   into an answer with Mr. Brown and you said it was --
19   how long -- how many times did I go out there?    And
20   you said you'd have to check your log.
21       A.   Well, when I said I'd have to check my log is
22   that -- because I had a GPS on my truck, Lewis could
23   physically go back and say, okay, Pittman was at
24   Uvalde hangar on this date.     My log was maybe not the
25   right nomenclature.    But it was, you know, semantics.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   103

1    What I meant was, we could physically go and see how
2    many days I was there.
3        Q.   Okay.    We could do that a different way.       If
4    you could, turn in this volume right here to Exhibit
5    Number 104.
6        A.   Yes, sir.
7        Q.   These are the weekly -- these are the daily
8    job reports; correct?
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   Okay.    If you would, look at page 2 of that
11   document -- or that very first page.         You see a list
12   of persons that were out there on the project?
13       A.   Yes, sir.
14       Q.   Okay.    And on this particular date, which was
15   December 6th of 2012, I see Martin Rojas, Luis
16   Fuentes, Fidel Montanyes, Alejandro Baldovino, and
17   Julio Barriaga.   Right?
18       A.   Correct.
19       Q.   What's behind Exhibit Number 104 are the
20   daily logs for all of December.      I don't see your name
21   as being out there any day in December.        Is that
22   accurate?
23 A. Is this all the reports you have for
24   December?
25       Q.   For December, yes.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             104

1        A.   And it's not a full month's report.    Is it
2    supposed to be?
3        Q.   Do you see -- do you -- do you recall being
4    out there in December?
5 A. I don't recall not being there.
6        Q.   Okay.    Well, let's look at the next one, 105.
7        A.   (Witness complying.)
8        Q.   And I'll just save you the trouble, just for
9    the sake of time.    Do you see the little TR numbers at
10   the bottom?
11       A.   Yes.
12       Q.   Just go to TR-00120.
13       A.   (Witness complying.)
14       Q.   Do you see your name on there?
15       A.   Yes, sir.
16       Q.   Along with Rod Lewis and Jack Green?
17       A.   Right.
18       Q.   All right.     And if you'll turn the page over
19   to 00130.
20       A.   (Witness complying.)
21       Q.   I'm sorry.     And that date was January 16th;
22   right?
23       A.   Yes.
24       Q.   The next one is going to be January 22nd.
25       A.   Okay.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              105

1        Q.    Do you see your name there?
2        A.    Yes, sir.
3        Q.    So, according to the daily job reports, you
4    were out there twice in January; is that correct?
5        A.    Correct.
6        Q.    Do you have any recollection that it's
7    different than that?
8        A.    No.
9        Q.    Okay.    So, in your testimony to Mr. Brown, he
10   asked you how often were you out there representing
11   the owner, and you said, "I went out there several
12   times."   In December and January, it looks like you
13   were out there twice.      Is that consistent with how
14   often you were out there; your recollection?
15       A.    Well, that's assuming these reports are --
16       Q.    I didn't ask you if the report was accurate.
17   I'm asking -- well, actually, I am asking you if the
18   -- does that report --
19 A. I think it is.     I think I was out there more
20   than two times in December and January.
21       Q.    How many times were you out there?
22 A. I don't know.
23       Q.    But the logs only show twice; right?
24       A.    These daily logs.
25       Q.    Twice?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                106

1           A.   Twice.
2           Q.   Do you have any documents -- any logs that
3    would show different?
4           A.   No.
5           Q.   Okay.    And in November, I see -- the logs
6    show that you were out there three times.      Do you have
7    any recollection that it's different than that?
8           A.   No.
9           Q.   In August, I show you were out there twice.
10   Do you have any recollection that it's different than
11   that?
12          A.   No.
13          Q.   In fact, you went out there and inspected the
14   pour before it happened on the foundation, didn't
15   you?
16 A. I did.
17          Q.   Okay.    So, when you say several times, is it
18   more accurate to say a couple of times a month that
19   you were out there?
20          A.   No.   I was in Encinal once a week.   And when
21   I made my trip to Encinal, I went to Uvalde, then
22   Encinal, and back.      And a lot of times I went from
23   Encinal, Uvalde, and back.       Several of those times,
24   there was nobody from SBS out there.
25          Q.   Okay.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               107

1        A.   So, that's what I'm saying, that these -- I'm
2    saying that these reports may not be accurate.
3        Q.   Okay.    And what you just testified to was
4    that you went out there four times a month; correct?
5        A.   According to this document.
6        Q.   No.    What you just said.    You said you went
7    out there once a week on your way out to Encinal.       So,
8    that's four times a month; right?
9        A.   No, that's not correct.      I said a lot of
10   times I would go to Uvalde, Encinal, Encinal, back to
11   Uvalde, and back to San Antonio.      So, there's twice
12   every week.    You know, I did that all the time.
13       Q.   It's just not reflected in any of the records
14   that have been produced?
15       A.   No.
16       Q.   Okay.    But you're saying there are logs
17   somewhere where that information would be?
18 A. I'm saying if you went and looked at my GPS,
19   it would show how many times I went there.     Whether or
20   not Lewis has that GPS log, I don't know.
21       Q.   Okay.    Now I need to hand you a whole
22   different volume, if I may.    If you would, turn to
23   Exhibit 48.
24       A.   Yes.
25       Q.   Do you recall a meeting on February 5th of

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            108

1    2013 when you terminated Select Building Systems?
2        A.   Yes.
3        Q.   And did you know that there was a person
4    there taking stenographic-type notes?
5        A.   Yes.
6        Q.   Who was that?
7        A.   Jane Reeves.
8        Q.   And who does she work for?
9        A.   She worked for us.    She worked -- actually,
10   she's an independent contractor that worked for us.
11       Q.   For us, being whom?
12       A.   Lewis Energy.
13       Q.   Okay.   And have you had a chance to review
14   these notes?
15       A.   Yes, I have.
16       Q.   When was the last time you reviewed these
17   notes?
18       A.   Last week.
19       Q.   Okay.   And when was -- when had you -- had
20   you reviewed them prior to that?
21       A.   Yes.
22       Q.   When?
23       A.   A long time ago.   I don't remember the exact
24   date.
25       Q.   Was it at the direction of Mr. Slates, or was

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  109

1    it before Mr. Slates got involved?
2        A.     No.    At the direction of Mr. Slates.
3        Q.     Did you see them -- did you see these notes
4    shortly after they were prepared in February of 2013?
5 A. I did.
6        Q.     Did you have a chance to make any corrections
7    that you wanted to make as to what you thought
8    happened?
9 A. I didn't think I made any corrections.
10       Q.     Is that because this Exhibit 48 fairly and
11   accurately represents who said what during that
12   meeting?
13       A.     Yes.
14       Q.     Okay.    Let's go through it then, if you don't
15   mind.    Let's just start with the first line.      "T.P."
16   that refers to you; correct?
17       A.     Correct.
18       Q.     Okay.    "Briefly met with Rod.     He wants to
19   terminate the contract."       Did I read that correctly?
20       A.     Yes.
21       Q.     Did you state a reason in that sentence?
22       A.     Sir?
23       Q.     Did you state a reason in that sentence?
24       A.     Yeah, I believe I did.
25       Q.     That Rod wants to terminate the contract;

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            110

1    right?
2        A.   Right.   Did I state a reason?     I mean, we had
3    beat that reason up for months prior to it.     It wasn't
4    a surprise to anybody.
5        Q.   Okay.    I don't see any reference in this
6    agreement to lack of manpower; failure to man the job
7    anywhere in this transcript.    Do you?
8        A.   No.
9        Q.   I don't see any reference to a lack of
10   manpower.   Do you?
11       A.   No.
12       Q.   I don't see the word "breach" anywhere in
13   this entire transcript.    Do you?
14       A.   No.
15       Q.   I don't see the word "defect" anywhere in
16   this entire transcript.    Do you?
17       A.   No.
18       Q.   I don't see any reference to "notices,
19   written or oral," in here.    Do you?
20       A.   No.
21       Q.   In fact, the only statement that's in here as
22   to why the contract is being terminated is that very
23   first line that says, "He wants to terminate the
24   contract," isn't it?
25       A.   Yes.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              111

1        Q.   And in this entire transcript you never
2    attribute the termination to anything that SBS did;
3    just what Rod Lewis wants.     Correct?
4        A.   Correct.
5        Q.   All right.     Now, let's look at the next --
6    well, skip a sentence.     "So, he wants to find out
7    where you're at and make it as amicable as possible."
8    Forget that part.    Let's read the next part.   "I know
9    you have additional material needed to be paid for.
10   Will pay your fee that you are due as soon as
11   possible."   Do you see that?
12       A.   Yes, sir.
13       Q.   And you were committing, as the owner's
14   representative, you knew that there was material that
15   needed to be paid for that was unpaid for; right?
16       A.   Correct.
17       Q.   And you knew that the contractor, SBS, had
18   fees that were owed at that point in time, and you
19   agreed to pay them as soon as possible.      Correct?
20       A.   Correct.
21       Q.   Okay.   Now, let's move down -- well, skip
22   down about two-thirds of the way where it says,
23   "Steve, have to ask" and then it says "Tom would have
24   asked the same thing."     Do you see where I am, just a
25   little bit below the middle of page?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   112

1        A.    Yes.
2        Q.    Okay.   The next sentence, "No uncertain terms
3    this morning with Rod.      If we can, let's find out
4    where we are with anything else and all bills that
5    you're owed, all payments that you're owed."        That's
6    what you asked them to find out; correct?
7        A.    Correct.
8        Q.    Okay.   And then -- I'm sorry.       And then Jack
9    -- who is Jack?
10       A.    Jack Green was the project manager.
11       Q.    He's one of SBS's employees; correct?
12       A.    Yes, sir.
13       Q.    Jack says, "Some issue with what we've done
14   not in the contract.      Change orders."     Do you recall
15   there being an issue with change orders not being
16   signed?
17       A.    Yes.
18       Q.    And what did you respond?
19 A. I put, "Not a problem.      Want to protect you
20   on this."
21       Q.    Okay.   And, "Mr. Steve" -- that would be who?
22       A.    Steve Schiffman.
23       Q.    The owner of Select Building Systems?
24       A.    Yes.
25       Q.    An owner of Select Building Systems.        Okay.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             113

1    "We want to be fair, too."    And then Tony; who is Tony
2    that's referred to there?
3        A.   Tony Weigand.
4        Q.   Who is he?
5        A.   He was the global construction manager for
6    Rod Lewis.
7        Q.   Okay.    And apparently he showed up late?
8        A.   Yes.
9        Q.   And in the next line, you catch him up.
10   "Tom, just informed SBS that we're terminating and
11   that we're going to be fair."    Did I read that
12   correctly?
13       A.   Yes, sir.
14       Q.   "Two outstanding draws and change orders not
15   processed.   Will get those processed and paid."   Did I
16   read that correctly?
17       A.   Yes, sir.
18       Q.   And if you would, turn the page.
19       A.   (Witness complying.)
20       Q.   Okay.    And if you'll go down, there's kind of
21   a grayish area.   Right below that grayish area, it
22   says, "Tom, we are, too."    Do you see that?
23       A.   Yes, sir.
24       Q.   Okay.    And it says, "Not a win-win scenario
25   for anyone."    Let's go down to the last sentence of

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                114

1    that where you state, "Will get payment done as soon
2    as possible."       Did I read that correctly?
3           A.   Yes, sir.
4           Q.   Okay.    And then Steve says, "Can we sign
5    releases?"    You say, "Absolutely."       And then you say,
6    "Contractually, we don't have to pay until the project
7    is finished.      We aren't going to do that."    Isn't that
8    what you said?
9           A.   Yes, sir.
10          Q.   And then the next sentence in that section,
11   that you want to finish it in a businesslike manner.
12   Did I read that correctly?
13          A.   Yes, sir, you did.
14          Q.   Okay.    Now, in point of fact, you didn't pay
15   Select Building Systems after this, did you?
16          A.   No.
17          Q.   Not a dime?
18          A.   No.
19          Q.   Right?
20          A.   Correct.
21          Q.   And you didn't process the change orders, did
22   you?
23          A.   No.
24          Q.   They were never processed; correct?
25          A.   Correct.

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                115

1        Q.   Were you making these statements on the
2    owner's behalf?
3        A.   Yes.
4        Q.   Now, did you ever inform SBS in this meeting
5    or thereafter that any of their payments were
6    contingent upon an inspection by you?
7        A.   No.
8        Q.   Did you ever -- did you ever alert SBS to any
9    deficiencies or problems with the work?
10       A.   No.
11       Q.   Did you ever ask SBS to come back out and
12   explain something, finish something, correct
13   something, or do anything with respect to any work
14   after February 5th, 2013?
15       A.   No.
16       Q.   Did anybody on the owner's behalf request
17   that Select Building Systems come out and explain why
18   something was done, correct an error, cure a problem,
19   change something, pour something, straighten
20   something, anything after February 5th, 2013?
21 A. I don't know if they did, but I did not.
22       Q.   Okay.    Okay.   If you would, I want you to go
23   back and look at -- in that same exhibit book -- are
24   you in Tri-Bar's exhibit book?     Yes.     Okay.   Tri-Bar's
25   Exhibit Number 46.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              116

1        A.   Yes.
2        Q.   Okay.   Now, this e-mail is dated six days
3    before the termination meeting; correct?
4        A.   That's correct.
5        Q.   And it says -- it's from you to Mr. Grable;
6    right?
7        A.   Correct.
8        Q.   And it's not copied to Select Building
9    Systems or anybody else.     It's just between you and
10   Mr. Grable, right?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   And you say, "I continue to be underwhelmed
13   with performance with SBS.     I went yesterday and they
14   had only four masons working.     After repeated requests
15   and threats for that matter, SBS has yet to man the
16   project properly in my opinion.      Consequently, I want
17   you to issue a 72-hour request to SBS in writing
18   stating that we are giving you a 72-hour notice that
19   you man the project or we will terminate the contract
20   for cause."   Did I read that correctly?
21       A.   Yes, sir.
22       Q.   Okay.   Now, we can go back and look at it
23   again if you want to.     But I think Mr. Brown read all
24   of that paragraph 14.2 in the AIA contract.     Is there
25   any reference to a 72-hour notice in that AIA

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             117

1    contract?
2           A.   No.
3           Q.   You've been a general contractor before;
4    right?
5           A.   Yes, sir.
6           Q.   Where is that 72-hour notice found?
7 A. It's not in the contract.
8           Q.   It's in subcontracts; right?
9 A. I don't know.
10          Q.   You don't -- you're not familiar with
11   subcontracts?
12          A.   Oh, I'm real familiar with subcontracts.
13          Q.   Isn't that a common provision to put in a
14   subcontract?
15 A. It's a common provision in general contracts,
16   too.    72 hours.   I've written 72-hour letters before.
17          Q.   Okay.   It's not in the standard AIA contract?
18 A. It's not in the standard AIA contract.
19          Q.   Okay.
20          A.   And I'm not referencing any AIA contract.
21   I'm just saying write a 72-hour notice.
22          Q.   Pursuant to what?
23          A.   To activity.
24          Q.   But I mean, under what?
25 A. I mean, I'm not making this up.   We keep

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             118

1    going out there, keep asking SBS to man the job.      They
2    don't do it.
3        Q.     And did Mr. Grable ever send that letter?
4        A.     Not to my knowledge.
5        Q.     In fact, you know he didn't do it; right?
6        A.     Yes.
7        Q.     Okay.   And we have an e-mail confirmation
8    from the summer.      It's Exhibit 110.
9        A.     This one.
10       Q.     There's an e-mail confirmation from Matt
11   Martinez that says that that 72-hour notice was never
12   sent; right?
13       A.     Okay.   Yeah.
14       Q.     Were you still part of -- were you still
15   working for Lewis Energy when that revelation was
16   made?
17       A.     No.
18       Q.     That was after your time with them?
19       A.     Yes, sir.    June 27th.
20       Q.     Now, you said that as the -- as the project
21   manager for Mr. Lewis, you were to protect his
22   interests; correct?
23       A.     Correct.
24       Q.     And how many projects did you have going on
25   at once?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             119

1        A.     Well, at that time we had the hangar, we had
2    an office project going on, we had several projects
3    going on in Encinal.
4        Q.     So, I want to say it's seven that were going
5    on at that time.      Does that sound right?
6        A.     At least.
7        Q.     Okay.   And -- that you were in charge of?
8        A.     Yes.
9        Q.     Is that right?
10       A.     Yes.
11       Q.     And this one was a million dollar project;
12   right?
13       A.     Correct.
14       Q.     Or at least, it started as a million dollar
15   project.   It got up to about 2, didn't it?
16 A. I don't know what the final cost was.
17       Q.     But you know the costs kept increasing;
18   right?
19       A.     Yes, sir.
20       Q.     And there were continual changes in the
21   project as well; right?
22       A.     Correct.
23       Q.     In fact, there were almost $800,000.00 worth
24   of changes after SBS was terminated; correct?
25 A. I don't know.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              120

1        Q.     Well, how many changes -- there were a
2    significant amount of changes at the time SBS was
3    being terminated; correct?
4        A.     There was -- there was a few changes.    Yeah.
5        Q.     I mean, like the entire interior.
6 A. I don't know.
7        Q.     Do you remember they changed the entire floor
8    structure?
9 A. I know we had to tear out all the framing, so
10   yeah.    We had to -- all the framing was done
11   improperly.
12       Q.     Okay.   I know -- I know that you're trying to
13   get that out there.     But the -- everything in the
14   interior was coming out anyway because they changed
15   the entire --
16       A.     No.
17       Q.     -- interior, didn't they?
18       A.     No.   All they did was add floors on top of
19   existing rooms.
20       Q.     Which required new plumbing, it required new
21   electricity --
22       A.     Well, sure it did.    You extend the plumbing
23   up -- it's not like we had -- I mean, it was just an
24   extension of plumbing --
25       Q.     Well --

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 121

1        A.   -- to add a second floor.
2        Q.   Actually, they had to cut some of the floor,
3    didn't they, to move the plumbing over to where Mr.
4    Grable wanted it?
5 A. I don't -- I don't know.
6        Q.   Okay.   You weren't involved in that part?
7 A. I don't believe so.
8        Q.   Okay.   Now, if I understood you correctly, it
9    was your testimony with Mr. Brown that you did not
10   decide to replace the electrical contractor or seek
11   bids for a new electrical contractor until you got
12   this outrageous proposal in early January of 2013 for
13   the change order.    Is that correct?
14       A.   Well, that was just the icing on the cake.
15       Q.   Okay.   Did you not understand my question?
16 A. I understood your question.         But you're
17   asking me to go back over a year and a half and tell
18   you what I was doing in January.      I can't do that.
19       Q.   Okay.   Was that the issue; the change order?
20       A.   Part of the issue.     And the other part was
21   that they -- they didn't man the job.        That was the
22   initial part, is they never -- and you can go through
23   their daily reports.     One electrician.     One
24   electrician.   Two electricians.     That was lucky.      One
25   electrician.   That's not manning the job properly.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              122

1        Q.    In your opinion.
2 A. In anybody's opinion.
3        Q.    Not in my opinion, but --
4        A.    How could an electrician pull wire with one
5    electrician?     You can't do it.
6        Q.    Let's get the timeline established, though,
7    as to when you started.     If you would, look in that
8    same exhibit book and go to Exhibit 65.
9        A.    (Witness complying.)
10       Q.    Are you there?
11       A.    Yes, sir.
12       Q.    Okay.    Look at the second e-mail.   Do you see
13   that one in the middle of the page?
14       A.    Right.
15       Q.    Do you see the date on that in the middle
16   e-mail?
17       A.    February 12th, 2013.
18       Q.    In the middle e-mail.     It's a chain.
19       A.    Yes.
20       Q.    The middle one is from you and it's dated
21   October 31st, 2012?
22       A.    Yeah.
23       Q.    Is that a yes?
24       A.    Yes, sir.
25       Q.    And who is Bob Carnwath?     Who is he employed

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                123

1    with?
2        A.     C&S.
3        Q.     And this is an e-mail from you and it says,
4    "We may be taking over this project and finish it
5    in-house."   Did I read that correctly?
6        A.     Yes, sir.
7        Q.     "The foundation is poured and the PEMB" --
8    and what does PEMB stand for --
9        A.     Pre-engineered metal building.
10       Q.     -- "should be delivered in two weeks.     Can
11   you give me a price for the balance of the project?
12   We would like the numbers as soon as possible.
13   Thanks."   And then you enclosed the MEP and
14   structural; correct?
15       A.     Correct.
16       Q.     So, as early as October 31st of 2012, two and
17   a half months before Robertson was terminated, you
18   were already soliciting bids from C&S to finish this
19   work; correct?
20       A.     Yes.
21       Q.     If you would, flip back to Exhibit 63.
22       A.     (Witness complying.)      Okay.
23       Q.     Okay.   I want to look at the e-mail starting
24   at the bottom of the page.       It's from you; is that
25   correct?   Do you see the November 2nd e-mail at the

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  124

1    bottom of the page?
2        A.     Yes, sir.
3        Q.     Okay.    And it's addressed to Mr. Lewis;
4    correct; that's who Rod is?
5        A.     Yes, sir.
6        Q.     "Rod, upon delivery, they need to give us
7    erection drawings and certification that the building
8    meets the specs.      We will verify the gauge, et
9    cetera."   And then the next part, "I think we need to
10   terminate the contract with them."        You're referring
11   to SBS; correct?
12       A.     Correct.
13       Q.     "I have Neena working on it.        They have
14   breached, as far as I'm concerned.        We can finish this
15   ourselves."      Did I read that correctly?
16       A.     Yes, sir.
17       Q.     This was never sent to SBS, was it?
18       A.     No.
19       Q.     There's not going to be a single e-mail or
20   document that we look at in the entirety of this trial
21   from you to SBS where it uses the word breach, is
22   there?
23       A.     Not that I know of.
24       Q.     But you used it with Mr. Lewis; right?
25       A.     (Witness nodding head up and down.)

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              125

1           Q.   Who is Neena?
2           A.   Neena is counsel for Rod Lewis.
3           Q.   So, you were -- you had enough authority to
4    go deal directly with Rod Lewis' attorneys?
5 A. I did.
6           Q.   Okay.    And Neena was one of those attorneys?
7           A.   Right.
8           Q.   And she was the attorney that helped draft
9    the contract; right?
10          A.   Correct.
11          Q.   The -- the first part -- the owner contract
12   of the AIA contract; right?
13          A.   (Witness nodding head up and down.)
14          Q.   What were you having to work on?
15          A.   Termination.
16          Q.   The proper steps?
17          A.   (Witness nodding head up and down.)
18          Q.   Is that --
19          A.   Yes, sir.
20          Q.   Okay.    Did she tell you that you had to have
21   a certification from the architect; that there was
22   a --
23          A.   No, she did not.     In fact, further down the
24   road when I discussed termination, Rod said he didn't
25   want to terminate yet.

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    126

1        Q.     Okay.
2        A.     Give SBS --
3        Q.     Well, let's look and see what Rod did say.
4    Let's look up at the top of the page.          You see where
5    Rod Lewis is writing back to the entire group?         It
6    says -- it's directed to Tony W; and that would be
7    Weigand?
8        A.     Weigand.
9        Q.     "Let's take care of this ASAP.        Give me your
10   opinion and let's make a quick decision.         Garrett" --
11   who is Garrett?
12       A.     He's the chief financial officer -- one of
13   the financial people with the company.
14       Q.     What's the direction to Garrett?
15 A. I'm sorry?
16       Q.     What's the direction that Rod Lewis gives to
17   Garrett?   "Hold all payments to this company until
18   further notice.    Thanks."     Did I read that correctly?
19       A.     Yeah.   I'm trying -- I'm sorry.       I'm trying
20   to find out where that is to Garrett.          I'm sorry.
21   Okay.
22       Q.     First page.
23       A.     Yes, sir.
24       Q.     "Garrett, hold all payments to this company."
25   Do you know how long the owner has to make payments

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               127

1    after a draw request is made under the contract?
2           A.   Well, they vary.
3           Q.   With this contract, do you know how long it
4    was?
5 A. I -- I don't.
6           Q.   Would it --
7 A. I know the --
8           Q.   -- surprise you to know it was 30 days?
9           A.   No, that wouldn't surprise me.
10          Q.   Is that fairly average?
11          A.   Yes, sir.
12          Q.   Do you know what the law is on it?
13          A.   No.
14          Q.   Would you be surprised to learn the law says
15   that an owner must pay within 35 days?       Would that
16   surprise you?
17          A.   No.
18          Q.   30 days is pretty standard, isn't it?
19          A.   Yes, sir.
20          Q.   Is it unusual for an owner to say, "Hold all
21   payments to this company until further notice"?
22          A.   No.
23          Q.   How long were the payments held?
24 A. I don't know.
25          Q.   The previous payment -- I'm just telling you,

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            128

1    the previous payment had been made in October.   Do you
2    know when the next payment was made?
3        A.   No, sir.
4        Q.   Okay.   Now, why is it important that the
5    contractor be paid?    Who does he pay?
6        A.   Subcontractors.
7        Q.   The -- if the contractor is not being paid,
8    is he paying the subcontractors?
9        A.   No.
10       Q.   Does that create problems?
11       A.   Sure, it does.
12       Q.   Okay.   So, in other words, if you're telling
13   Morrell Masonry, "I want five guys out there," and
14   Morrell looks back at you and says, "We haven't been
15   paid in two months; we'll put one guy out there."
16   Isn't that what happens?
17       A.   Theoretically.
18       Q.   Okay.   In this case, would you be surprised
19   to learn that it was 87 days before the payments were
20   made?
21       A.   Yes.
22       Q.   That would surprise you?
23       A.   Yes.
24       Q.   Okay.   But you were being told all along,
25   weren't you, that nonpayment was causing problems;

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             129

1    right?
2 A. I was told that the payments were slow and we
3    tried to speed it up.
4        Q.   And that it was causing problems; right?
5        A.   Maybe verbally.     I'm sure I was told more
6    than once.
7        Q.   Let's just turn back a page to 62.      An e-mail
8    from Jack Green to you?
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   About this same time, October 23rd; correct?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   If you would, let's go down to -- let's just
13   go through -- well, never mind.      Let's just go down to
14   the bottom.   See where it says, "The delay in
15   payment"?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   "The delay in payment on draw number 2 has
18   caused problems in regards to maintaining a project
19   schedule, mostly with pouring the remainder of the
20   concrete.    We only have one supplier to work with, and
21   now they have requested all payments COD."     Did I read
22   that correctly?
23       A.   Yes, sir.
24       Q.   So, you were advised that the concrete guy
25   was now demanding cash on delivery; correct?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                130

1          A.   Correct.
2          Q.   And that's what COD stands for.      "I'm still
3    trying to negotiate this with the supplier and will
4    keep you informed of my progress.        The outcome of
5    these negotiations will determine a pour date."         Isn't
6    it true that that payment to that particular -- for
7    that particular concrete pour was not made until
8    January 17th?
9 A. I -- I don't remember the exact date, but I'm
10   assuming that's when it was made if you're referencing
11   it.
12         Q.   Well, let's do this.      Let's switch over and
13   look at Exhibit Number 4 in the same book.
14         A.   (Witness complying.)      Okay.
15         Q.   All right.     This is an e-mail from John
16   Maywald.   And who is John Maywald?
17         A.   He's SBS financial.
18         Q.   Okay.   And it's addressed to you; correct?
19         A.   Yes, sir.
20         Q.   And this attaches a copy of draw number 6,
21   and it talks about the originals being delivered.         And
22   this references, "Still have not received the executed
23   change orders -- which, you know, we will talk about
24   in a minute; those were change orders from July;
25   right --

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             131

1        A.   Yes.
2        Q.   -- "and the following payments or draws."
3    And there are three draws listed there; correct?
4        A.   Yes, sir.
5        Q.   And the November draw is pretty substantial,
6    isn't it?
7        A.   Yes, sir.
8        Q.   So, at this point in time, Jack Green is
9    telling you, we're having problems; we can't get
10   concrete without getting payments.      And as of
11   December 28th, you know that there's three payments
12   that have -- three draws that have not been paid that
13   are holding up the project; correct?
14       A.   Yes, sir.
15       Q.   And $271,00.00; that's holding up almost
16   every single trade, isn't it?     Do you want to look
17   through that draw request?
18       A.   Yeah.   I'd like to look at it.     (Witness
19   complying.)   Yeah.   This is -- actually, this draw is
20   for the metal -- pre-engineered metal building.
21       Q.   That would be Schulte; right?
22       A.   Correct.
23       Q.   But the prior draws, 4 and 3, involved
24   concrete and electrical; right?
25 A. I'm surprised there would be a monthly draw

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                132

1    for $3500.00 or for 28,000, for that matter.    Are
2    those the full draws?
3        Q.   Did I ask you -- did I ask you whether you
4    were surprised about the draw or whether it was paid?
5 A. I'm sorry.
6        Q.   Was it paid?
7 A. I don't know.    I'd have to see.
8        Q.   All right.    Let's look at the next exhibit,
9    number 5.
10       A.   (Witness complying.)
11       Q.   We've now gone from -- we've gone from
12   October 23rd, when -- the first exhibit that we looked
13   at where Jack Green was complaining about lack of
14   payment, to December 23rd, where Mr. Maywald was
15   asking you about payment.     And now, in this e-mail, if
16   there's actually -- you'll see in the middle of the
17   page, "Was finally able to get the Los Cerritos checks
18   just before lunch."   Do you see that?
19       A.   Excuse me.    Yes.
20       Q.   Okay.   What's the date of that e-mail?
21       A.   January 17th.
22       Q.   Okay.   Is that when -- I'm sorry.    If you
23   would -- I skipped ahead of where I meant to be.      If
24   you look down at the very bottom there, do you see the
25   bottom e-mail --

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 133

1        A.   Yes, sir.
2        Q.   -- on that same page, January 9th?        Do you
3    see that one?
4        A.   Yes, sir.
5        Q.   Okay.    And that's from Dave Morgan.      Who is
6    Dave Morgan?
7        A.   He's with SBS.
8        Q.   And that's directed to you.         And it says,
9    "Appreciate the opportunity to meet on Monday."
10   Starting about this point in time, did SBS have
11   regular meetings with you?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   They set them up; correct?
14       A.   Correct.
15       Q.   Okay.    In this particular meeting they had
16   been asking you about those three checks for those
17   three draws and the change orders.      Remember?
18       A.   Yes, sir.
19       Q.   And Mr. Morgan is, in essence, asking you if
20   there's a problem, above here.      And if you read
21   through the e-mail, it says, "Would it be beneficial
22   for me to contact anyone in your organization to see
23   what is holding up payment and processing of these
24   documents?   I'm getting pressure on my end to get this
25   stuff done."    Was there somebody above you that was

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             134

1    holding payments?
2        A.     Yes.
3        Q.     Who was that?
4        A.     Tony Weigand.
5        Q.     And was there somebody above you that was
6    holding the change orders and not signing those?
7        A.     You know, I remember that the -- well, yes.
8        Q.     Who was that?
9        A.     Tony.
10       Q.     Okay.   Now, if you'll turn back to the first
11   page, we already read the middle one, but now look at
12   the top.   You got the payment, but now Mr. Morgan is
13   asking you on the 18th," any chance we can get the
14   change orders?"
15       A.     Where is --
16       Q.     At the top on page 1.
17       A.     Yeah.   "Any chance we can get change orders?"
18   I'm sorry.   At the same time.
19       Q.     Did you ever tell anyone at SBS that the
20   change orders had actually been signed by the owner?
21       A.     No.
22       Q.     Did you ever tell them that they would be
23   forthcoming?
24       A.     No.
25       Q.     If you would, turn to Exhibit Number 6.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            135

1        A.   (Witness complying.)
2        Q.   And you see that one is dated January 31st?
3        A.   Yes.
4        Q.   Okay.   And again, let's assume 30 days
5    because that's what's in the contract.     It's an e-mail
6    from David Morgan to you, and it says, "Can you update
7    SBS on the status of payment on our December
8    application for payment that was sent to you on
9    December 28th, 2012?"    Did I read that correctly?
10       A.   Yes.
11       Q.   And at that point in time, it would be three
12   days late, assuming a 30-day deadline; right?
13       A.   Yes.
14       Q.   Do you know if that draw was ever paid?
15 A. I don't know.
16       Q.   You know it wasn't paid, because you fired
17   SBS six days later.
18       A.   Okay.   Well, then --
19       Q.   That's why we're here, is because that draw
20   wasn't paid.
21       A.   Okay.
22       Q.   Okay.   And then again, Mr. Morgan asks you,
23   "Can you also update SBS on the status of the
24   execution of change orders one and two that have been
25   in your possession since -- July and October -- "for

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               136

1    several months," is what it says.      "SBS has been
2    informed in the past that these change orders have
3    been signed, but to date we have never received a
4    signed copy."    Did you ever respond to this and say,
5    oh, they haven't been signed?
6        A.   No, I don't remember.
7        Q.   Well, if you had an e-mail, it would have
8    been on the Lewis server; correct?
9        A.   Correct.
10       Q.   And we didn't get it.      So, if we didn't get
11   it, --
12       A.   Well, then I didn't respond to it.
13       Q.   -- you didn't respond to it.        You didn't
14   correct his information that we have been told that
15   they're signed?   You knew they weren't signed; right?
16 A. I -- I don't remember.      I don't even remember
17   what change order 1 and 2 are.
18       Q.   Change order number 1 is when they changed
19   the size of the hangar.     That's the big one of
20   $44,000.00.   You don't remember that one?
21 A. I remember that now that you mention it.
22   What's change order number 2?
23       Q.   Change order number 2 had to do with framing
24   -- with the exterior siding.
25       A.   Okay.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            137

1        Q.   But we can -- if you want to look at the
2    change orders, they're actually -- as long as we're in
3    this section of the book, they're Exhibits Number 1
4    and 2.
5        A.   Okay.
6        Q.   Do you see Defendant's Exhibit Number 1?
7        A.   Yes, sir.
8        Q.   And that's got John Grable's signature on it.
9    It's got Dave Morgan's signature on it from SBS.    And
10   it's dated in July of 2012; right?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   And this is the additional cost associated
13   with the larger airplane; right?
14       A.   Correct.
15       Q.   And that's $44,600.00?
16       A.   Yes.
17       Q.   And what was that change; do you remember?
18 A. I believe we raised the -- in fact, I did --
19   we raised the height of the door going into the hangar
20   to accommodate a 2000LX Falcon Dassault.
21       Q.   Okay.   And that was a change that was made
22   after the contract was signed, but before they
23   actually poured the foundation; right?
24       A.   Yes.
25       Q.   Now, when it comes to raising something like

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             138

1    that, is that something that SBS can just do on its
2    own; oh, no dig deal; we'll just raise it up 6 feet?
3        A.   Oh, no.    No.   It's quite complicated.
4        Q.   Yeah.    Because the architect has to design
5    what it's going to look like; right?
6        A.   Correct.
7        Q.   And then the engineer has to tell them
8    whether or not it's going to stand up if he builds it
9    at that height?
10       A.   Absolutely.
11       Q.   And then you have to worry about the other
12   things that go into it; the electrical, and you have
13   other issues; right?
14       A.   Correct.
15       Q.   So, SBS has to receive architectural drawings
16   and then they have to receive structural drawings from
17   the engineer?
18       A.   And they have to modify the pre-engineered
19   metal building.
20       Q.   Correct.
21       A.   Which they told us they could do, no problem.
22       Q.   Right.    So -- and those things all have to
23   happen before SBS can actually get out and pour the
24   concrete or do whatever they need to do?
25       A.   Yes, sir.    Absolutely.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            139

1        Q.    So, SBS is at the mercy of Victor de Anda,
2    who was the structural engineer?
3        A.    Yes, sir.
4        Q.    And at the mercy of John Grable and Matt
5    Martinez, who were the --
6        A.    Yes.
7        Q.    -- architects; right?
8        A.    Yes.
9        Q.    If you would, book at Exhibit Number 3.
10       A.    (Witness complying.)
11       Q.    And this was from October 2012; this change
12   order.   So, this has to do with the windows and the
13   panels and columns and whatnot; correct?
14       A.    Correct.
15       Q.    This is the interior -- some of the interior
16   stuff?
17       A.    Yes.
18       Q.    And this is a change for $27,544.00?
19       A.    Yes, sir.
20       Q.    Okay.   Now, when it came to that first change
21   order, did you allow SBS to sit back and wait on the
22   change order to be signed?
23       A.    No.
24       Q.    In fact, you insisted that SBS get out there
25   and pour the foundation and begin erecting that metal

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                     140

1    building and order all the parts before that change
2    order was signed?
3           A.   Yes.
4           Q.   If you don't have a change order signed by
5    the owner, can the owner come back and say, I didn't
6    sign that; I'm not paying for it?
7           A.   Theoretically.
8           Q.   Isn't that what they're doing in this case?
9 A. I don't know what they're doing.
10          Q.   Would it surprise you to learn that's the
11   position they're taking in this case?
12          A.   Yes.
13                      THE COURT:    Counsel, let's break for
14   lunch; okay?
15                      MR. CLARK:    Okay.   I'm stopping, Your
16   Honor.
17                      THE COURT:    Okay.   1:40.   Mr. Pittman,
18   you can step down.       1:40, please.
19                      (Recess taken.)
20                      THE COURT:    Mr. Pittman, come on back up,
21   sir.
22                      MR. SLATES:   Your Honor, one admission on
23   preadmitted exhibits.       63 through 69 of Tri-Bar's, I
24   believe, are admitted by agreement.
25                      THE COURT:    63 through 69?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             141

1                   MR. SLATES:    Yes, Your Honor.
2                   THE COURT:    Okay.   Tri-Bar 63 to 69 are
3    admitted.   Go ahead, sir.
4        Q.   (BY MR. CLARK)      Mr. Pittman, before we leave
5    Exhibit 63 -- that's the one that says, "Garrett, hold
6    all payments to this company until further notice.
7    Thanks" -- did you ever tell anyone at SBS -- or you
8    didn't tell anyone at SBS that Tri-Bar was holding
9    payments, did you?
10       A.   No.
11       Q.   Did Mr. Grable know that?
12 A. I don't know.
13       Q.   I see he's copied on --
14 A. I think -- I think he did.      Yeah.
15       Q.   Do you know if he ever told anyone at SBS
16   that their payments were being held?
17       A.   No, I don't know.
18       Q.   So, in response to the e-mail inquiries from
19   Mr. Morgan about, "Is there somebody that I should
20   talk to or somebody over your head that I can go to to
21   get payment facilitated," you never bothered to
22   mention to Mr. Morgan that the payments were being
23   held at the direction of Bob Lewis, did you?
24       A.   No.
25       Q.   Okay.   Now, we talked about some of the

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                142

1    issues related to the lack of payment and what that
2    does to the subcontractors.      If you would, your book
3    is open to Exhibit Number 14 -- it's SBS Exhibit 14.
4    It's open to that.     You're there.
5        A.    Oh, I'm sorry.
6        Q.    You were on the page I wanted you to be right
7    there.   That's SBS at the bottom right-hand corner.
8    It says, "SBS-1962."
9        A.    That's right.
10       Q.    This -- if we can describe for the Court what
11   we're looking at here.      This is a picture from up in
12   the top front corner of the hangar; right?
13       A.    Oh, yes.
14       Q.    Yes.    And so, you're looking across what
15   would be the big front doors for the airplane to pull
16   into the hangar; right?
17       A.    Correct.
18       Q.    Okay.   And what's this big area out here to
19   the front that has no concrete in it?
20       A.    That's the -- that's basically a taxi area
21   where the planes --
22       Q.    Can I call it an apron?
23       A.    Yes, sir.
24       Q.    Is that what they called it out there on --
25       A.    Yeah, I believe so.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                143

1          Q.   Okay.    And that apron sat there unpoured just
2    like that for how long?
3 A. I don't know.     Quite awhile.
4          Q.   Three months; right?      And that was the
5    concrete that they were waiting to pour that Jack
6    Green referenced in the October 23rd e-mail to you
7    where he said, "I can't get the concrete guys to get
8    back out there because they're now on COD."       And
9    that's what he's waiting on; right?
10         A.   Right.
11         Q.   And that concrete supplier did not get paid
12   until January 17th.      We saw that right before lunch;
13   correct?
14         A.   Correct.
15         Q.   Isn't it also true that Mr. Schiffman had a
16   direct conversation with you about getting concrete
17   for this apron?
18 A. I'm sure he did.     I don't remember it.
19         Q.   Didn't he offer to pay for the concrete out
20   of his own pocket if you would personally guarantee
21   it?
22 A. I don't remember that.
23         Q.   Are you saying it didn't happen or are you
24   saying you just don't remember?
25 A. I don't remember it.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             144

1        Q.   Now, did this --
2        A.   Actually, I do remember that.
3        Q.   You do remember him saying that?
4        A.   Yes.
5        Q.   And you -- you said no; right?
6        A.   Right.
7        Q.   Okay.    And you wouldn't put it on your own
8    credit card, would you?
9        A.   No.
10       Q.   Now, how does one manufacture doors and stand
11   them up from the outside without that concrete being
12   there?
13       A.   Well, this apron had nothing to do with the
14   doors.
15       Q.   Well, what I'm saying is that if you're the
16   door manufacturer and you're trying to access where
17   those doors go in those tracks, which is the only side
18   that you can access them from --
19       A.   Right.
20       Q.   -- inside?
21       A.   Well, yes and no.    But I mean, there's more
22   than one way to get those doors in there.
23       Q.   Would the easy way be to just walk across --
24       A.   Yes, sir.
25       Q.   -- what should be an apron?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               145

1        A.     Yes, sir.
2        Q.     Yeah.    Okay.   If you would, turn to Exhibit 8
3    of that same book.
4        A.     (Witness complying.)
5        Q.     If you would, turn to page 2 of that.
6        A.     (Witness complying.)
7        Q.     Are you on page 2 of Exhibit 8?
8        A.     Yes, sir.
9        Q.     Okay.    Let's start at the bottom.   Do you see
10   your e-mail dated May 19th?
11       A.     Right.
12       Q.     And that one is to John Grable?
13       A.     Right.
14       Q.     And it begins, "Every project Rod has is
15   micromanaged."      Did I read that correctly?
16       A.     No, you didn't.     Is macro micromanaged.
17       Q.     Oh, I'm sorry.     You're right. Macro
18   micromanaged.      And then you said, "He needs to find
19   someone he trusts to let him make all this" --
20   expletive -- "happen.       That's not me and damn sure not
21   Tiny."   Who is Tiny?
22       A.     Tony.
23       Q.     Tony.    Okay.   "Hope you find someone in his
24   future."   And then Grable responds, "He always second
25   guesses everyone.      So sad."   Right?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 146

1        A.   Uh-huh.
2        Q.   And then your response is, "Ironically, crews
3    are pulling off because I can't get them paid."      This
4    is May 19th; right?
5        A.   Right.
6        Q.   This is -- remember SBS was terminated
7    February 5th of 2013.     This is three months after the
8    termination of SBS.    You're now the general
9    contractor; right?
10       A.   Yes.
11       Q.   And you can't get people paid; right?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   In fact, it was United Erectors that pulled
14   off the project, wasn't it?
15 A. I don't know.     I mean, United Erectors
16   finished the job.
17       Q.   But they pulled off the project and left one
18   guy there and then came back once they got paid.      Do
19   you remember that?
20 A. I don't.    But --
21       Q.   Okay.    Then you go on.    "The cheapest best
22   guys have to be paid every other week.       Steve Mower"
23   -- and who is he?
24       A.   He's in accounting.
25       Q.   With?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                147

1        A.     Lewis.
2        Q.     Okay.    "Steve Mower in accounting told me
3    that that's not going to happen because Tiny has to
4    approve everything and he sits on all the invoices
5    until the cows come home."      You meant that; right?
6        A.     Yes.
7        Q.     And that's exactly what he did, was they sat
8    on these payments forever; right?
9        A.     Right.
10       Q.     And now turn back to the first page.     When
11   you had proposed -- the e-mail down at the bottom,
12   also dated May 19th when you proposed that somebody
13   needs to take over this stuff from -- or Grable said
14   somebody needs to take this over.       You responded, "No,
15   he doesn't.   Let's earn our keep and keep him out of
16   the daily" -- expletive -- "we need to do.      He doesn't
17   need to know about the crap we do every day."      Did I
18   read that correctly?
19       A.     Yeah.
20       Q.     And then Mr. Grable responds back, "Seems
21   like we are back in an SBS grind with us pushing the
22   unpaid."   Right?
23       A.     Right.
24       Q.     And that's exactly what it was in May when --
25   when you wrote this, you were pushing unpaid people to

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 148

1    do more work; right?
2        A.     Right.
3        Q.     And Mr. Grable writes back, "Not right in my
4    mind to tool around with the working man's paycheck."
5    Oh, I'm sorry.      I skipped a word.   "Nothing to worry
6    about, my friend."     That is in there as well?
7        A.     Right.
8        Q.     And Mr. Grable writes back, "Not right in my
9    mind to tool around with the working man's paycheck."
10   Now, Mr. Pittman, it was only four days after this
11   that you resigned from Lewis Energy.          Was -- you
12   mentioned that one of the reasons that you resigned
13   from Lewis Energy was because you had a potential
14   project with some investor?
15       A.     Right.
16       Q.     There were other reasons why you left Lewis
17   Energy; right?
18       A.     That was the primary reason I left.
19       Q.     But you also left because this project wasn't
20   going according to plan; right?
21       A.     No.   That didn't have anything to do with me
22   leaving.
23       Q.     Well, you -- one of the other reasons that
24   you left was because of the other legal problems that
25   you were having at the time; correct?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 149

1        A.   No.
2        Q.   Okay.    So, if your attorney told me that you
3    -- that you left -- that you were actually terminated,
4    then he falsely represented that to me?
5        A.   My attorney told you that?
6        Q.   Yeah.
7        A.   Who said that?
8        Q.   Luitjen.
9        A.   Luitjen?
10       Q.   Yes.
11       A.   Mark Luitjen?
12       Q.   Yes.
13       A.   Judge Mark Luitjen?       No, he didn't say that,
14   because it's not true.       I didn't -- I wasn't
15   terminated.    I resigned.
16       Q.   He said that you resigned --
17                   MR. SLATES:    Objection, Your Honor.
18   That's hearsay.
19                   THE COURT:    Sustained.     Rephrase it.
20                   MR. CLARK:    I'll move on, Your Honor.
21       Q.   (BY MR. CLARK)       Now, were you aware that at
22   some point in time, to keep people on the project,
23   that -- that the people that were involved in the
24   project were required to put stuff on their credit
25   cards?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  150

1           A.   Yes.    I put things on my credit card.
2           Q.   Okay.    And that was to keep the project
3    moving; right?
4           A.   Right.
5           Q.   And that's because you couldn't get payments
6    from the owner?
7           A.   Well, it was easier for me to -- instead of
8    setting up accounts with suppliers, that I just put it
9    on my American Express.
10          Q.   Okay.    So, if you would, move over to Exhibit
11   Number 9.
12          A.   (Witness complying.)
13          Q.   And I just don't know when in June you
14   stopped providing services to Mr. Lewis.          So, this
15   doesn't actually copy you, but I'll ask if you're
16   aware of it.       The one down at the bottom is from
17   June 26th.    It's from Daniel Boddie.         Who is Mr.
18   Boddie?
19          A.   He's the guy that we pulled in to finish the
20   job.
21          Q.   Okay.    It says, "Tony" -- and that's Tony
22   Weigand that he's talking about?
23          A.   Yes.
24          Q.   "Citing nonpayment, United Erectors has left
25   this project for other jobs to make payroll for the

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                151

1    remainder of this week."      Did I read that correctly?
2          A.   Uh-huh.
3          Q.   Do you remember that happening?
4          A.   No.    I wasn't there.
5          Q.   Would this have been after you left then?
6          A.   Yes.
7          Q.   This was not atypical, was it?
8 A. It wasn't what?
9          Q.   Atypical.
10         A.   Well, United Erectors I've use on a lot of
11   projects, and they tend to be problematic.     You have
12   to pay them not on 30 days, but sometimes every other
13   week.
14         Q.   Okay.   Now, did you ever propose to Mr. Lewis
15   that -- that you would continue to push the unpaid at
16   his -- for his benefit?
17 A. I don't remember that particular --
18         Q.   Do you recall telling him that you were going
19   to let SBS work through the erection of the building
20   and then look for an excuse to fire them?
21         A.   No.
22         Q.   Okay.   If you would, turn to Exhibit Number
23   66.
24         A.   (Witness complying.)
25         Q.   Okay.   First of all, let's look down at the

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                     152

1    very bottom of Exhibit 66, where it's an e-mail from
2    John Grable.      And I'll just ask you if you -- if you
3    agree with the statement down -- where it says,
4    "Material selection deadlines are now, as material
5    needs to be ordered and there are lead times on stone
6    that require four to six weeks for delivery."           Did I
7    read that correctly?
8        A.     Yes.
9        Q.     This is November 4th of 2013.        And at least
10   some of the stone has not been ordered yet; is that
11   correct?
12                     MR. SLATES:    For the record, it's
13   November 2012.
14                     MR. CLARK:    '12.   Yes.   Sorry.   '12.
15       Q.     (BY MR. CLARK)       Is that correct that some of
16   the stone has not even been ordered yet?
17       A.     Yes.
18       Q.     And they were waiting on Mr. Lewis to make a
19   decision on what kind of stone would be ordered;
20   right?
21       A.     Well, that's not entirely correct.          We were
22   waiting on a mockup to be made.
23       Q.     Okay.
24       A.     The stone mockup to be made that was never
25   made.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                153

1          Q.   And the material deadline -- the materials
2    needed to be ordered, and he was asking for the
3    material selections from Mr. Lewis; right?
4          A.   Well, yeah.   But we couldn't do that until
5    after the mockup was done.     Because the mockup had,
6    like, three or four different types of stone in it.
7    And we wanted to see what that was going to look like
8    before we ordered all the stone.
9          Q.   And that caused delays, didn't it?
10         A.   Well, it caused delays because we couldn't
11   get the -- couldn't get the mockup done.
12         Q.   Right.   Okay.   If you would, look at the
13   e-mail right above that.      And it says from Rod, "I'm
14   ready to move forward with selections now, John.
15   Let's proceed as we have discussed and you have
16   identified."   And the next paragraph, "What I don't
17   understand right now, and we should hold for
18   discussion, is how we move forward with this project.
19   So, before ordering the material, I will have to
20   discuss with Tony W. and Tom how we plan to proceed.
21   This can be done in the next 48 hours."      He's
22   referring to your proposal to terminate SBS, isn't
23   he?
24         A.   Let me see here.    I think it's referring to
25   the mockup, but --

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    154

1           Q.   Well, looking at your response to this, it
2    certainly looks like it's addressing SBS, doesn't it?
3           A.   Yes.
4           Q.   And your response was, "Rod, best case, we
5    get the building in full, they get it and erect it.
6    If they "F" up the erection, we hammer them, we take
7    over the project, we're golden."
8           A.   Right.
9           Q.   And so, at that point in time, this was just
10   two weeks after the directive to hold all payments.
11   You knew that you were holding their payments.           You
12   knew they were having problems with their trade.           You
13   knew they couldn't get the concrete out there that
14   they needed to pour the apron so they could work on
15   the door.    You knew that they were waiting on a stone
16   selection material that was deliberately being held
17   back here.    You weren't telling any of this to SBS and
18   you were just going to sit back and wait and see if it
19   was a problem with the erection and then you were
20   going to terminate SBS; right?
21                      MR. SLATES:    Objection, compound.
22                      THE COURT:    Overruled.    You can answer,
23   sir.
24                      THE WITNESS:    Oh, okay.
25          A.   Well, that's -- that's not a one-sentence

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             155

1    answer.
2        Q.    (BY MR. CLARK)    Well, they were set up to
3    fail, weren't they?
4        A.    They set themselves up to fail.
5        Q.    When you -- when Mr. Lewis holds payment for
6    three months and they can't pay their trade, that's
7    setting the general contractor up to fail, isn't it?
8        A.    Granted, it's not the best situation.
9        Q.    Well, you were getting payments monthly, I
10   assume, in May; right, from Mr. Lewis when you were
11   acting as the general contractor?
12 A. I -- I wasn't there.
13       Q.    In May.   The e-mail we were just looking at
14   where you were talking about people wanting to get
15   paid and pushing the unpaid.
16       A.    Oh, yeah.   Yeah.
17       Q.    You were having to push the unpaid and you
18   couldn't get money out of Mr. Lewis, could you?
19 A. It was slow.
20       Q.    So, February 5th comes along when you have
21   this meeting.   And then we've already established that
22   after that meeting on February 5th, when you
23   terminated SBS, it's my understanding that you had no
24   more communications with SBS at all; correct?
25 A. I think we had one or two phone

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                156

1    conversations, but not -- not many.
2        Q.     And none of them about the work; right?
3        A.     Right.
4        Q.     They were all about, like, administrative
5    matters?
6        A.     Yes, sir.
7        Q.     All right.    If you would, go back to Exhibit
8    Number 14; the actual letter that is Exhibit 14.
9        A.     (Witness complying.)
10       Q.     Do you remember this letter?
11       A.     Yes, sir.
12       Q.     Okay.    The first paragraph deals with
13   administrative stuff; right?
14       A.     Yes.
15       Q.     And that -- you said you had a conversation
16   with somebody maybe about some of that stuff.        The
17   second one really doesn't mention much except about
18   Schulte.   The third paragraph says, "Jack, you may not
19   be aware, but we have discovered several defects in
20   work delivered by SBS.      Glacier Cap has hired an
21   independent consultant to test and review all as-built
22   conditions.   This effort continues and is still under
23   way to complete a detailed list that outlines these
24   defects and how they will be resolved."       Are you aware
25   of any detailed list that was ever sent to SBS that

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             157

1    those -- as said in this letter?
2        A.   No.
3        Q.   "Today it was determined the building is a
4    minimum of 2 inches out of plumb towards the west."
5    What is -- did you -- were you involved in determining
6    that?
7        A.   Yes.
8        Q.   Did you get out there with a level and shoot
9    it yourself?
10       A.   Actually, I did.
11       Q.   And you determined that it was 2 inches out
12   of plumb?
13       A.   No.    I didn't determine it was 2 inches out
14   of plumb.   When we had the erector come out and do the
15   -- actually, when Speedway came out and did the
16   initial inspection, they were the ones that said that
17   this building is racked 2 inches out.
18       Q.   Okay.    And did Speedway -- I mean, did you
19   contact Schulte at that point, the building's
20   manufacturer, to find out what the tolerances were?
21       A.   Yes, we did contact him and ask for
22   tolerances.
23       Q.   And 2 inches is within tolerance, isn't it?
24       A.   Oh, no, it's not.
25       Q.   Oh, you don't think so?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               158

1        A.   No, I don't think so.
2        Q.   Okay.   We'll get to that one in a minute.
3    Today -- "And the double roof lock seam roof panels
4    are not contiguous as specified."    How many of the
5    roof panels were not contiguous?
6 A. I don't remember.
7        Q.   Wasn't it only two?
8 A. I don't remember.   I know that -- well --
9        Q.   "The diaphragm function of the roof element
10   will be compromised when the building is plumb and
11   will have to be completely removed and replaced."
12   What engineer provided you with that information?
13 A. I didn't write this letter.
14       Q.   Did you have a hand in editing the letter?
15       A.   No.
16       Q.   Who in your office did?
17 A. I don't know.   I might have -- I might have
18   edited this, but I don't remember.
19       Q.   I'll tell you what.    Let's look at
20   Exhibit 111.
21       A.   (Witness complying.)    Sorry.    I'm having a
22   hard time.
23       Q.   I know -- that notebook.    I'm going to do
24   something with that tonight.
25       A.   Okay.

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  159

1           Q.   So, that's from Jennie Briggs to you.         And it
2    encloses that letter with revisions on there.         So,
3    whose revisions are they?
4           A.   Those are Jennie Briggs'.
5           Q.   Okay.   But you saw the letter before it went
6    out?
7           A.   Yes.
8           Q.   And you -- and you approved it?
9 A. I didn't -- not approve it.       Yes, sir.
10          Q.   Okay.   At that point in time, did you know
11   what the tolerances were for the building?
12 A. I don't remember.
13          Q.   Why would Mr. Grable say in his letter that
14   it was -- that it violated the quality industry
15   standards if you can't even remember whether you had
16   the tolerances at that point or not?
17          A.   Well, I know that when you physically look at
18   a building and you've got a masonry wall that's here
19   and a metal structure that's like this, you can -- you
20   can look at it and see that it's out of plumb.
21   Regardless -- if the tolerance -- are you telling me
22   that 2 inches out of plumb is within building industry
23   standards?    I disagree.
24          Q.   How many of those columns were out of plumb?
25          A.   Well, the whole building was racked.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             160

1        Q.   The information I've seen shows two columns
2    out of plumb.
3        A.   So?
4        Q.   Was it more than two; do you know?
5 A. I'm saying the whole building was racked.
6        Q.   So, it's your testimony that all the columns
7    were out of plumb?
8        A.   No.    All the columns don't have to be out of
9    plumb for the building to be racked.
10       Q.   Okay.    If you --
11       A.   That's more of the mainframe that's --
12       Q.   -- would, let's turn to Exhibit Number 73.
13       A.   (Witness complying.)
14       Q.   Okay.    Exhibit Number 73 is an e-mail from
15   you to John Grable that says, "Looks like we're going
16   to have to take the roof off before we can rack the
17   building to plumb."   Did I read that correctly?
18       A.   Yes.
19       Q.   At that point in time, did you have the
20   tolerances for the building?
21       A.   No.
22       Q.   If you would, turn to the next page -- turn
23   to the next Exhibit 74.
24 A. 74?
25       Q.   74.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              161

1        A.    (Witness complying.)
2        Q.    In fact, your prior e-mail was dated
3    February 28th, the same day as the letter.    And here
4    on March 4th, it's an e-mail from you to Mr. Pittman
5    saying, "Let's check with the PEMB standard to see
6    what the tolerances are as far as the building being
7    plumb."   Correct?
8        A.    Correct.
9        Q.    But at the time you wrote the letter and made
10   the conclusion that the roof needed to come off, you
11   didn't know what the tolerances were as far as the
12   building being plumb, did you?
13       A.    Correct.
14       Q.    And if you look at Exhibit 82 -- do you see
15   Exhibit 82?
16       A.    Yes, sir.
17       Q.    That's an e-mail from Erick Key.    And who is
18   Erick Key?
19       A.    Schulte Building representative.
20       Q.    Okay.   And they're the -- Schulte is the one
21   that actually manufactured the building -- the
22   structure?
23       A.    Yes.
24       Q.    And Exhibit 82 provides some of the
25   tolerances for the material that they work with;

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                162

1    correct?
2        A.     Correct.
3        Q.     And then Exhibit 83 provides the rest of the
4    tolerances -- the erection tolerances; correct?
5        A.     Correct.
6        Q.     So, it wasn't until March 7th that you got
7    the erection tolerances for this building; right?
8        A.     Right.   This is dated August 10th.
9        Q.     Which one are you looking at?
10 A. I'm sorry.     The -- yeah, this is March 7th.
11       Q.     Right.   March 7th of 2013.     Now, you've not
12   been designated as an expert in this case, have you,
13   by any party?
14       A.     No.
15       Q.     And so, you're not here to provide any expert
16   testimony on any issues here today, are you?
17       A.     No.
18       Q.     Then I won't ask you about the tolerances.
19   Do you know if SBS provided a response to Mr.
20   Pittman's letter; the one on February 28th?       Do you
21   know if SBS gave a response to Mr. -- I'm sorry -- Mr.
22   Grable?
23       A.     Oh, I don't know.
24       Q.     If you would, look at Exhibit 17.
25       A.     (Witness complying.)

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             163

1        Q.   Do you see the e-mail transmittal on the
2    first page and then you see the letter dated
3    March 19th on the next page?
4        A.   Yes.
5        Q.   Do you see that?
6        A.   (Witness nodding head up and down.)
7        Q.   Okay.    Let's go through -- and you've seen
8    this letter before?
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   Okay.    In fact, you received it from Mr.
11   Grable on or about March 19th; right?       Then you
12   received it again from Mr. Schiffman on the 20th?
13       A.   Right.
14       Q.   Okay.    Let's go through that -- that letter
15   from Mr. Schiffman.   In it, the second paragraph,
16   smack dab in the middle, it says, "Without prior
17   verbal or written communication of any sort, SBS was
18   summarily informed they we would no longer be
19   associated with this project."     Did I read that
20   correctly?
21       A.   Yes.
22       Q.   And if I understood your testimony earlier
23   this morning, that's a fairly accurate statement,
24   isn't it?
25       A.   Yes.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            164

1        Q.   Okay.   And then if you'll look down there
2    where the numbers are 1, 2, and 3; do you see that?
3        A.   Uh-huh.    Yes.
4        Q.   Number 2 is the allegation in that
5    February 28th letter that the building was out of
6    plumb, which is contrary to measurements by SBS, the
7    metal building erector, and the metal building
8    supplier, Schulte."    Did I read that correctly?
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   And you're saying at that point in time,
11   somebody -- that you -- you or somebody had
12   measurements that differed; correct?
13       A.   Correct.
14       Q.   Those measurements were never supplied back
15   to SBS, were they?
16       A.   No.
17       Q.   There was never any -- in fact, there was
18   never any reply to this letter from you at all, was
19   there?
20       A.   That's correct.
21       Q.   Okay.   And number 3, "The diaphragm function
22   of the roof element will be compromised."    That was a
23   statement Mr. Grable made in his letter.     "And that's
24   contrary" -- this is what Mr. Schiffman wrote -- "is
25   contrary to the improved metal building engineering

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            165

1    which is not dependent upon the roof diaphragm."    Were
2    you aware of that?
3        A.   Oh, yeah.    Well, all roofs provide some form
4    of diaphragm.    A diaphragm design on a metal building
5    is -- is established by several things.
6        Q.   The roof is just one of those components;
7    right?
8        A.   Just one of those components.
9        Q.   Okay.    So, the fact that the diaphragm
10   element is compromised is -- doesn't take away any of
11   the other diaphragm elements of the rest of the
12   building, does it?
13       A.   No.
14       Q.   Okay.    The next sentence says, "Both Jack and
15   I intended to communicate with you on the substance of
16   that letter, but did not receive any phone calls."
17   They did try to communicate with you, didn't they?
18       A.   Yes.
19       Q.   They left you numerous messages, didn't they?
20       A.   Yes.
21       Q.   Both of them; both Jack and Steve.    And you
22   saw the messages coming in -- the calls coming in on
23   your cell phone, didn't you?
24       A.   Yes.
25       Q.   You saw that it was -- you knew that it was

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              166

1    Steve Schiffman that was calling you; right?
2        A.    Yes.
3        Q.    And you didn't answer?
4        A.    Correct.
5        Q.    You knew it was Jack Green that was calling
6    you and you didn't answer?
7        A.    Correct.
8        Q.    You let it go to voicemail?
9        A.    Right.
10       Q.    You listened to the voicemails; right?
11       A.    Most of them.
12       Q.    And they said, call me, what's this about;
13   stuff like that?
14       A.    Yeah.
15       Q.    And you never called back?
16 A. I never did.
17       Q.    You never wrote back?
18       A.    Never.
19       Q.    Was this at the instruction of somebody?
20       A.    No.    I just felt that at that point in the
21   development of this thing that it wasn't beneficial.
22       Q.    Okay.    In fact, when you read Mr. Schiffman's
23   letter, it goes through and talks about -- you know,
24   it refutes the three things that are in Mr. Grable's
25   letter.   It says, hey, we made phone calls.   On the

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   167

1    next page it goes through and talks about offering
2    assistance.    It talks about receiving the package.       It
3    talks about how we were supposed to get payment; we
4    haven't gotten paid.        No calls have been returned.   No
5    exchange of information has been accomplished with
6    you.    And it goes through and raises a bunch of other
7    issues, doesn't it?
8           A.   (Witness nodding head up and down.)
9           Q.   And none of that you saw fit to respond to;
10   correct?
11          A.   Correct.
12          Q.   Okay.    Including the statement that, "We take
13   Grable's letter seriously.        We continue to be willing
14   to meet with you to achieve your initial goal of
15   amicably settling all matters associated with your
16   desire to close out this project."         That didn't spur
17   you to pick up the phone and say, hey, got a -- we
18   need you to come out and rerack this building?
19          A.   Yeah.    This was -- this was --
20          Q.   After the termination; right?
21          A.   Right.
22          Q.   No need to?
23          A.   No need.
24          Q.   Okay.    In fact, if you look at Exhibit Number
25   20, right there in the middle, that's where Mr. Grable

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  168

1    sends you this -- Mr. Grable sends you his copy of the
2    March 19th letter because he got it first; right?
3        A.     Right.
4        Q.     "I wanted you to see this."       And you wrote
5    back to Mr. Grable, "Huge.      Want to keep you out of
6    the impending fight.     It's going to happen and it
7    makes my life easier taking you out of the mix.
8    Unfortunate, but Schiffman has put me in a position.
9    I have no other recourse.     I have to crush him and I
10   will."   That's what you wrote; right?
11       A.     That's what I wrote.
12       Q.     You weren't going to let him come back and do
13   anything with that project.     You were just going to
14   make sure that you changed -- you fixed everything
15   that you could and stuck it against his bill; right?
16       A.     Well -- but you have to understand.      This is
17   after several months of telling them to fix things --
18   telling them counted times to fix things.
19       Q.     We'll get to those in a second.      Because
20   there's not a single instance that you can tell me
21   right now where they did not agree to fix something;
22   correct?
23       A.     Well, I disagree with that.
24       Q.     All right.
25       A.     We'll get to that.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  169

1        Q.     I'll let you bring that up with -- let me
2    finish this exhibit.       I'm trying to move along.   Mr.
3    Grable writes back and says, "I'll stand there with
4    you, my friend"; right?
5        A.     Uh-huh.
6        Q.     Two of you were going to be against SBS;
7    right?
8        A.     Right.
9        Q.     Because you knew there was going to be an
10   impending fight coming up over --
11       A.     Right.    And we're going to protect the owner,
12   who is my client, or who I worked for.
13       Q.     Okay.    And then I think I already know the
14   answer to this.      But if you'll look very quickly at
15   Exhibits 12 and 13.
16       A.     Yes.
17       Q.     12 is a letter from Mr. Schiffman to you a
18   week after -- no, ten days after the termination;
19   correct?
20       A.     Correct.
21       Q.     Smack dab in the middle, "As Jack and I
22   expressed, SBS will cooperate throughout the final
23   stage of this process.       We have called upon our
24   relationship with the various subcontractors and
25   suppliers to amicably close out their contracts on

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                170

1    this project with minimal additional costs.     This was
2    in no small part accomplished but for your
3    representation everyone would be fairly compensated in
4    a timely manner."    You didn't see fit to respond to
5    this letter at all, did you?
6        A.     No.
7        Q.     Okay.   And Exhibit Number 13 was an e-mail
8    that Mr. Schiffman sent to you right before that
9    February 28th letter comes back.      And it says, "Dear
10   Tom, in the meeting you talked about getting SBS a
11   closeout check quickly.     I called yesterday to inquire
12   about the status.    I know you contacted some of the
13   subcontractors to continue with the project, but we
14   still need to close out SBS's subcontracts
15   financially.     Please give me an update.   Steve."   And
16   you never called him back on that either; right?
17       A.     Because I wasn't done with doing the forensic
18   studies.
19       Q.     Okay.   And then Mr. Schiffman continued to
20   call you during the entire month of March, didn't he?
21 A. I don't remember.
22       Q.     Well, you recall it lasting for quite awhile,
23   don't you?
24       A.     Yeah.
25       Q.     And eventually he became a pest and you

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               171

1    decided to tell him, don't call me anymore?
2 A. I think that's what happened.
3           Q.   Okay.   If you'll look at Defendant's
4    Exhibit 19, this is March 26th.
5           A.   Yeah.
6           Q.   Do you see the e-mail right there in the
7    middle?
8           A.   Yes, sir.
9           Q.   "Hello Steve and Jack.      Per the advice of our
10   in-house counsel, Tony Trevino, we are not permitted
11   to discuss the Los Cerritos project with you or anyone
12   from SBS Construction in any manner to include text
13   messages, voicemail, in-person discussion, e-mail, or
14   other written correspondence."         Did I read that
15   correctly?
16          A.   Correct.
17          Q.   And then you say, "Any inquiries, requests,
18   or comments directed to us will not be answered, but
19   will be forwarded to Tony Trevino to be answered by
20   him.    You can reach Tony Trevino at" -- and his e-mail
21   address with Lewis Energy.        Correct?
22          A.   Correct.
23          Q.   And after -- well, after February 5th, you
24   had no more substantive communication about any of the
25   defective issues that you were claiming with SBS;

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                172

1    right?
2           A.   Right.
3           Q.   You never shared this report with them, did
4    you?
5           A.   No.
6           Q.   Who worked with you on this report?
7           A.   We had -- Speedway did the majority of the
8    work on the erection, roof, inspection of the metal
9    building.    Then we did a lot of it with different
10   contractors.
11          Q.   Okay.    So, you -- did you actually get out
12   there and do any of it or were you relying on others?
13          A.   No.   We actually -- some of it was developed
14   as it went on.       Like when we were checking dimensions
15   for brick lugs and noticed that there was improper
16   brick lug poured, that's when we dug some of that dirt
17   out to -- to make access for their -- so, it wasn't
18   just, this guy did this, this guy did that.       So, it
19   was an ongoing discovery.
20          Q.   Okay.    As long as you brought up the brick
21   lug, the brick lug was something that was not on the
22   structural engineered plans at the time of the pour;
23   right?
24 A. I don't know.
25          Q.   Well, you know it wasn't.     You know the brick

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            173

1    lug was added right before the pour.
2 A. I don't remember.
3        Q.   You don't -- you remember going out and
4    inspecting it; right?
5        A.   Yeah.    Well, it became apparent when we
6    started to do the CMU that there was no brick lug for
7    the -- the brick --
8        Q.   But you can see --
9        A.   -- and the stone.
10       Q.   -- you can see on that brick lug that it was
11   not part of the original pour; right?
12       A.   Right.   You're right.
13       Q.   It was added.    And you -- that was added at
14   the last minute and you went out there and inspected
15   it before it was poured; right?
16       A.   Negative.
17       Q.   Let's look at Exhibit 98.
18 A. I inspected the pour.
19       Q.   When you say you inspected the pour, what do
20   you mean?
21 A. I inspected prior to them pouring.
22       Q.   Well, you inspected it during the pour,
23   didn't you?
24       A.   No.   I didn't come out there until after they
25   were done pouring.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                174

1           Q.   And then you saw everything that was out
2    there?
3           A.   Uh-huh.
4           Q.   And you saw where the forms were, and you
5    didn't see any problems with the way the forms were
6    set?
7 A. It looked good at that point.
8           Q.   Okay.    And did the structural engineer also
9    go out there?
10          A.   Yes.
11          Q.   And in fact, he provided a report, didn't he?
12          A.   Yes, sir.
13          Q.   And he didn't come up with any problems
14   with --
15          A.   No.
16          Q.   -- the foundation, and he approved it?
17          A.   Right.
18          Q.   Okay.    I want to switch just for a second
19   just because I'm -- I'm trying not to overlap what Mr.
20   Robertson went over with you -- or Mr. Brown went over
21   with you about Robertson.       But I want to talk about
22   Robertson for just a second.       Who did you tell at SBS
23   to terminate Jerrod Robertson from this project?
24 A. I told Jack Green and I told Kyle.
25          Q.   Kyle Kieke?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                175

1        A.   Yeah.
2        Q.   Do you know which one of them actually
3    terminated --
4        A.   No.
5        Q.   -- Mr. Robertson?
6        A.   They never gave me a report.
7        Q.   If you would, let's look at Exhibit Number
8    25 -- I'm sorry, not 25.    That is it.     I'm sorry.
9        A.   Okay.
10       Q.   Okay.    Let's start down at the bottom where
11   there's actually a communication from Jerrod Robertson
12   to Jack Green at SBS.    "Jack, please advise on payment
13   status for payout number 2 in the amount of 16,628 for
14   the hangar.    Late lien notices will be sent either
15   tomorrow -- today or tomorrow by ourself and our
16   vendors if payment hasn't been received.      I'm trying
17   to avoid this if possible.    Please advise."    You were
18   sent a copy of this e-mail; right?
19 A. I don't see that I'm copied on there.
20       Q.   Look at the top.    Jack Green forwarded it to
21   you with his comment.
22       A.   Yes.
23       Q.   Jack Green forwarded to you and says, "Tom,
24   see below.    Please advise on how you would like me to
25   handle this type of situation.     I'm sure other

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    176

1    vendor/suppliers will be sending in notices as well."
2    Correct?
3        A.     Correct.
4        Q.     And at this point in time, the last payment
5    was in early October, three months before; right?
6 A. I don't remember.
7        Q.     Do you remember anything to the contrary?
8        A.     No.
9        Q.     Okay.    And then your response is on the next
10   page to Jack's e-mail, Number 26.           From you back to
11   Jack Green.      "Give me a call to talk about the
12   electrician.      I'm going into a meeting now and should
13   be out by 4:45.      We want to make change."
14       A.     Yes.
15       Q.     So, you have an e-mail from --
16                     THE WITNESS:    Can I use the restroom?
17                     THE COURT:    Let's take a five-minute
18   recess.    Okay.
19                     THE WITNESS:    I'm sorry.
20                     THE COURT:    Yes, sir.    That's fine.
21                     (Recess taken.)
22                     THE COURT:    Go ahead, Mr. Clark.
23       Q.     (BY MR. CLARK)       Just to finish up on
24   Robertson right quick.         That letter that we looked at
25   from February 28th from Mr. Grable to talk about the

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             177

1    building being out of plumb; I didn't notice any
2    reference to any problems with electrical in there.
3    Did you?
4        A.     No.
5        Q.     In the correspondence that Mr. Grable sends
6    on March 15th, I don't -- and we'll get to that one in
7    a little while, but there's no reference to electrical
8    in there either, is there?
9        A.     No.
10       Q.     Are you aware of any communication that was
11   sent to Jerrod Robertson before Mr. Robertson filed
12   suit where there's a complaint made about any work
13   with his electricity?
14       A.     No.
15       Q.     Was there an inventory done of Mr.
16   Robertson's stuff?
17       A.     Yes.
18       Q.     Who did the inventory?
19       A.     Electricians.
20       Q.     What happened to the inventory?
21 A. Most of it we couldn't use.
22       Q.     No, no.   What happened to the list; the
23   inventory list?
24       A.     Oh, I don't know.    I seem to remember seeing
25   something to that effect.      In the last -- in the last

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            178

1    bit of correspondence reviewing this, there was a --
2        Q.   Robertson's stuff or in Tri-Bar's stuff?
3        A.   Tri-Bar's.
4        Q.   Okay.   Do you know if -- have you ever seen a
5    schedule of values against what was on the inventory?
6        A.   Yes.
7        Q.   Has that -- do you know if that's been
8    produced in this case?
9 A. It was my understanding it had.
10       Q.   Okay.   All right.   Now I want to talk about
11   the door; the hangar door.    And for this, I think
12   we'll just have to kind of give a concept that the --
13   just correct me if I'm wrong when I get into this.
14   The hangar front door has pockets that sit off to the
15   side; wings, if you will?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   And the doors retract into those walls?
18       A.   Yes.
19       Q.   Is that a fair description of it?
20       A.   Yes.
21       Q.   And there was a problem that eventually
22   manifested itself in November where it was -- somebody
23   discovered that the foundation, as poured, was going
24   to accommodate a 75-foot door.    The structural
25   building that Mr. Grable designed was for an 80-foot

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                179

1    door.    Do you recall that?
2        A.     Yes.
3        Q.     It was a big issue, wasn't it?
4        A.     Big.
5        Q.     Did you delve into how it happened?
6        A.     Yes.
7        Q.     Okay.    In Exhibit 30, do you see where it
8    says in red -- or it's a red stamp, but it's,
9    "Architect to verify dimensions."
10 A. I can see that.    Yes.
11       Q.     You see this on there?     So, again, this is
12   going to be Victor de Anda, the structural engineer;
13   right?
14       A.     Right.
15       Q.     And that's his comment back to the architect
16   to verify dimensions.      The original date was 7/20 of
17   '12; right?
18       A.     Yes.
19       Q.     And these are the structural plans; right?
20       A.     Can I see them, please?
21       Q.     Sure.
22       A.     When you said those are structural plans,
23   those are actually shop drawings from the
24   pre-engineered metal building manufacturer.      They're
25   not structurals.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              180

1        Q.   Okay.    But these are the shop drawings that
2    Schulte was going to be working off of; right?
3        A.   Yes.
4        Q.   And the dimensions that they're referring to
5    are all on this page 3; right?
6        A.   Right.
7        Q.   The door dimensions.      Those were the ones
8    that were in question.     And they were -- they were
9    bubbled and highlighted on the copy and they said,
10   verify these dimensions; right?
11       A.   Correct.
12       Q.   Do you know if Mr. Grable -- Mr. Grable is
13   the architect; right?
14       A.   Yes, sir.
15       Q.   Do you know if Mr. Grable ever went out and
16   verified -- ever verified the dimensions?
17 A. I don't know if he verified those dimensions
18   on those shop drawings.
19       Q.   Do you know if Mr. Grable ever got back with
20   the structural engineer, Synergy, to say, I've
21   designed a building that's bigger; you need to go back
22   and redo the foundation drawing so it's bigger?
23 A. I don't know if he did or not.
24       Q.   I thought you investigated this issue.
25 A. I did, but --

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   181

1        Q.     Did you ever see a foundation that was
2    different than the one that was poured?
3        A.     No.
4        Q.     No structural engineered foundation?
5        A.     No.
6        Q.     Okay.   So, SBS poured the foundation that the
7    structural engineer designed and specced; right?
8 A. I -- I believe that's correct.
9        Q.     Every report that I've seen says if you go
10   out there with a tape measure and you lay it out, that
11   you're going to find that SBS poured it exactly the
12   way that the engineer drew it.        Correct?
13       A.     Correct.
14       Q.     The problem is, is that what Mr. Grable
15   specced didn't fit on that slab.
16       A.     No.   I think it's more complicated than that.
17       Q.     But that is an issue is that these dimensions
18   for the doors were off; right?
19 A. It was always supposed to be an 80-foot
20   opening.   Who had the dimension wrong, I don't know.
21   But from the very first day that we talked with Rod
22   and SBS, that hangar door -- Rod brought the -- the
23   problem -- he goes, "Well, where did you -- what is
24   the opening on this -- this hangar?"           And he said,
25   "Oh, it's 70" -- whatever feet it is.          He goes,

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                182

1    "That's not big enough.        We need to enlarge this
2    building for an 80-foot door."       That was before we
3    even broke ground.
4          Q.   Okay.   But isn't it also true that the issue
5    between -- the conflict between the one and the other
6    didn't come up until late November, early December?
7          A.   Actually, we never found out that there was
8    not -- that that door wasn't going to be big enough.
9    It wasn't until we -- that Rod and I and a few other
10   people were out there, we said, "Open up the doors.
11   How -- what's the opening?"       And the opening turned
12   out to be 76 feet and 5 inches.
13         Q.   Okay.   If you would, turn to Exhibit 57 for
14   me.
15         A.   (Witness complying.)
16         Q.   That meeting that you're referring to would
17   have taken place on November 28th?
18         A.   Yes.    Probably.
19         Q.   And that's referenced in the --
20         A.   Actually, this says December 3rd.
21         Q.   Look in the -- see where it says "attachment"
22   below "subject"?
23         A.   Yes.
24         Q.   And it says, "Attachment, Los Cerritos site
25   visit 11/28/12 PDF?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              183

1        A.     Uh-huh.
2        Q.     So, that's when the site visit was, was
3    November 28th; right?
4        A.     Okay.
5        Q.     All right.     So, go back to that first page.
6    And it's from John Grable.       It says, "Attached please
7    find my report for your Uvalde hangar site visit.
8    Please note the smaller hangar door size as originally
9    requested by Don Wilson but reviewed and not
10   identified as a problem by Bo Cardin" -- who is Bo
11   Cardin?
12       A.     Well, that should be Bob Cardin.     Bob Cardin
13   is one of the people that works for Lewis Energy that
14   handles planes.
15       Q.     Is he a pilot?
16       A.     Yes.
17       Q.     TP; that would be you?
18       A.     Right.
19       Q.     And JGA; that's John Grable & Associates;
20   correct?
21       A.     Correct.
22       Q.     "Based on the actual aircraft dimensions."
23   So, apparently, at some point in time, it was supposed
24   to be a smaller door size, wasn't it?
25       A.     No.    It was supposed to be a larger door.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 184

1    And what they're referring to is the fact that the
2    door that is there is smaller than was intended.
3        Q.    Okay.    And he says, "See highlighted in
4    yellow on the attached report."      And so, if you flip
5    over to the attached report, the first page of the
6    attached report, Los Cerritos site visit 11/28/12,
7    attending" -- and that's Bob Cardin LEG, for Lewis
8    Energy Group; Tom Pittman, that's you; right?
9        A.    Right.
10       Q.    And for the Glacier Capital Construction,
11   Jack Green, and Kyle, superintendant at SBS, Victor de
12   Anda, who is the structural engineer; right?
13       A.    Right.
14       Q.    John Grable and Matt Martinez; right?
15       A.    Right.
16       Q.    Okay.    Now, if you would, turn the page to
17   the second page of that and look under the section
18   called, "Rigid Frame Erection."      Do you see that?
19       A.    Uh-huh.   Yes, sir.
20       Q.    And there's a highlighted part -- in some
21   it's highlighted, some of it comes out a little bit
22   fuzzy.   Yours is highlighted, isn't it?
23       A.    Yes, sir.
24       Q.    Okay.    And that's the way it was in the
25   original -- the way Mr. Grable had it.       And it says,

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              185

1    "When originally designed, former GCC Don Wilson
2    directed that hangar door to open 80 clear.      The PEMB
3    has configured the door to open at 75 feet.      SBS
4    stated they would provide hangar door pocket
5    extensions of 2 feet 6 inches at each end per the
6    structural -- per Synergy Structural Engineering
7    supplemental drawings.     Hangar door was raised from
8    22 feet to 26 feet when the building height was raised
9    4 feet in height to house the newly purchased 2000LXS
10   with a wingspan of 70 feet.     2 and a half feet cleared
11   at each wing end is satisfactory per BC" -- that's Bob
12   Cardin -- "and sees no need to change 75-foot wide
13   opening to 80 feet."      Did I read that correctly?
14       A.     Yes, sir.    Can I ask you, what is SSEI
15   supplemental drawing?
16       Q.     This is SSEI, but I don't have a supplemental
17   drawing.
18       A.     Well, SSEI stands for what?
19       Q.     That's the -- the Synergy Structure
20   Engineering Incorporated.
21       A.     Oh, okay.
22       Q.     That's --
23 A. I'm sorry.
24       Q.     That's okay.    And then the very last
25   paragraph down there is not highlighted and it says,

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                        186

1    "The hangar will not accommodate the Falcon 7X, as the
2    wingspan is above 83 feet in length and the tail is
3    26'1.       The hangar door as roughed-in is 75 and 26 feet
4    tall.       So, adjusting the functional width dimension
5    serves no function."          Did I read that correctly?
6           A.     Yes.
7           Q.     Okay.   And this was sent to Mr. Lewis on
8    December 3rd; correct?
9           A.     Correct.
10          Q.     And you were copied on that as well, weren't
11   you?
12          A.     Yes.
13          Q.     And the way I'm reading that, it says leave
14   it at 75 feet.        Am I reading it wrong?
15          A.     Well, no.    I don't think you're reading that
16   particular thing wrong.          But the bottom line is that
17   Rod Lewis wanted an 80 foot opening.              He's parking a
18   $40 million plane in there.          And we didn't want to be
19   compromised by a few inches on either side of the
20   wings.
21          Q.     Okay.   A month and a half later,
22   January 23rd, the issue of the 80-foot door came up
23   again.      This is seven weeks later.       For seven weeks
24   the door has sat there in construction being built at
25   75 feet; correct?

                               TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                              PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                187

1        A.     No.   It wasn't until weeks after that we
2    found out that it wasn't 80 feet.
3        Q.     That just says it was at 75 feet on
4    December 3rd.
5        A.     No.   Okay.   It's not saying that it's 75 --
6    let me read this again because -- yeah, it says that
7    the change should be from 75-foot wide opening to
8    80-foot.   It's the last sentence in that paragraph.
9        Q.     No.   It says -- it says that the wing span is
10   satisfactory per BC and sees no need to change 75 wide
11   opening to 80 feet.
12       A.     Well, that's right.   Bob Cardin said, well,
13   you know what, let's make -- let's just go ahead and
14   keep it at 75 feet.
15       Q.     Right.   And that's what I said.
16       A.     But Rod Lewis didn't say that.     Rod Lewis
17   wanted his 80-foot opening.
18       Q.     Were you the owner's rep out there?
19       A.     At that time.
20       Q.     Did you agree with this?
21       A.     No.
22       Q.     Did you --
23 A. In fact, there's another e-mail out there
24   that I sent to Rod where it says that we're going to
25   make it 80-foot.    They agreed to make it 80-foot.       And

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 188

1    we'll make the modifications necessary.
2        Q.   The next day?
3        A.   No.
4        Q.   The next week?
5 A. I don't know.     But I know it's out there.
6        Q.   All right.     Let's get to it.     That would be
7    Exhibit 59.    So, the first e-mail was December 3rd
8    that you got that said, we're leaving it at 75 feet.
9        A.   Right.
10       Q.   This is January 23rd, eight weeks later;
11   eight weeks of construction later.      And your e-mail is
12   down at the bottom, and it says, "After further review
13   on the hangar door, I have found the following:       On
14   December 3rd a site report was prepared -- a site
15   report by JGA highlighted the fact that the opening
16   was 75 feet when the original intent was to have an
17   80-foot opening."    Okay.   How come you didn't mention
18   in there that the pilot said there's no need to move
19   the thing back out to 80 feet?
20       A.   Because Rod Lewis didn't -- I mean, Bob
21   Cardin didn't buy that $40 million plane.       Rod Lewis
22   bought it.
23       Q.   Why didn't you feel it necessary to inform
24   Mr. Lewis --
25       A.   We gave -- we exhausted every option to keep

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 189

1    that door at 76 feet.
2        Q.     These are the only two e-mails I got.     They
3    were eight weeks apart.       One of them says keep it at
4    75 feet and the other one says --
5        A.     We went through almost a month of trying to
6    say, can we justify this; can we justify this.
7        Q.     This is your report to Mr. Lewis; right?
8        A.     Correct.
9        Q.     January 23rd.     And you neglect to mention
10   what the pilot said about the 75-foot opening; right?
11       A.     No.   He -- he knew what Bob Cardin said about
12   that.    He told me.
13       Q.     You were there?
14       A.     Yeah -- well, I know it because Rod talked to
15   me about it.     And he goes, "I want my 80 feet."   And
16   we went through every option and the bottom line
17   was --
18       Q.     So, Rod knew it was 75 feet on December 3rd
19   and he waited until January 23rd before he told you he
20   wanted 80 feet?
21 A. I -- I don't know what --
22       Q.     That's his --
23       A.     -- I don't know what the actual dates are.
24   But you know, we exhausted every -- every option to
25   try to justify keeping it at a 76-foot 2-inch opening

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                190

1    versus an 80-foot.
2          Q.   Well, just the -- part of what you've been
3    talking about is there were just delays and delays and
4    delays.    Well, this is one where the door is done
5    December 3rd and you wait -- the owner waited eight
6    weeks before they said, no, I don't want 75; go back
7    and redo the whole thing and change it to 80.
8 A. I don't --
9          Q.   That could have been much sooner, couldn't
10   it?
11         A.   Yes, it could have been.
12         Q.   Now, in this particular e-mail, you then go
13   back and say, "SBS said they could modify to give us
14   the 80-foot opening."     Right?
15         A.   Right.
16         Q.   And then you -- the last sentence says,
17   "Regardless, you were told you would have an 80-foot
18   opening and you will."     Okay.   Now, SBS actually did
19   agree to put in that 80-foot opening, didn't they?
20 A. I believe they did.
21         Q.   All right.   If you want to look at Exhibit
22   60.
23         A.   (Witness complying.)
24         Q.   That's actually where Kyle Kieke pitches the
25   proposal to say, we're going to pour two slabs that

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              191

1    extend further out into those door pockets for the
2    door track extensions; right?
3        A.   Uh-huh.
4        Q.   Install two additional heavy steel columns
5    for the end walls.   And it goes through and describes
6    how they're going to take off the roof at that point,
7    the 13 sheet panels that cover that little wing wall
8    area, and redo those door panels; right?
9        A.   Right.
10       Q.   Okay.    So, this was -- SBS poured the
11   foundation it was supposed to pour.
12       A.   You think that?
13       Q.   Yeah.    And Synergy poured the foundation that
14   Synergy drew.    Schulte made the building that Grable
15   told them to build manufactured out of metal.      Right?
16       A.   Right.
17       Q.   The two didn't match; right?
18       A.   Oh, how did they not match?
19       Q.   The doors didn't match.
20       A.   What was wrong with the doors?
21       Q.   The door openings didn't match.    One was
22   75 feet and one was laid out for 80.
23 A. I'm -- now I don't understand you.    What was
24   -- so, you're telling me that the building was
25   fabricated with 80-foot doors?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 192

1          Q.    The building was fabricated with 75-foot
2    doors.     The foundation -- no -- yeah, the other way
3    around.
4          A.    Yeah.    The building was fabricated with
5    80-foot doors.       So, when the building was delivered,
6    SBS cut the structure down and made those 80-foot
7    doors 75-foot doors.       Isn't that correct?
8          Q.    Yes.
9          A.    Okay.
10         Q.    Right.
11         A.    But they didn't --
12         Q.    But Schulte built what they were told to
13   build; right?
14         A.    And SBS modified on-site to accommodate a
15   different building --
16         Q.    To accommodate --
17         A.    -- without even telling us.        Without telling
18   us.   We found that after the fact.
19         Q.    And in any case, you -- SBS agreed to fix
20   that, didn't they?
21         A.    Yes.
22         Q.    Okay.    And if you would, turn the page to
23   Exhibit 61.    From January 30th, this is from John
24   Grable, but it references you.        It says, "Tom Pittman
25   and I had a conference call with Kyle regarding the

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               193

1    steps required to make right the original spec for an
2    80-foot wide door."   And then below in the next
3    paragraph it says, "This will not result in any
4    additional cost to you.    SBS will pay for this out of
5    their own pocket since this was the original
6    specification."   Did I read that correctly?
7        A.   Yes.
8        Q.   Okay.    So, at this point in time, you've
9    identified a problem.    Whose fault it was is, I guess,
10   debatable.   But SBS is saying, not only will we fix
11   it, but we'll pay for it; correct?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   They never got the chance to do that, did
14   they?
15       A.   No.
16       Q.   In fact, they -- the next paragraph, it says,
17   "Kyle Kieke stated he estimates it will take three
18   weeks to complete these adjustments, but is waiting
19   for metal building supplier to confirm delivery of the
20   additional steel columns that are located at the back
21   interior of the hangar pocket doors."       Those steel
22   columns were delivered on Friday after the
23   termination; correct?
24       A.   Oh, I don't remember that.
25       Q.   Okay.    You don't remember that coming up in

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             194

1    your meeting?
2        A.     No.   But I'm sure if you have it, it's there.
3        Q.     It's in the meeting notes.
4        A.     Okay.
5        Q.     Jack says, "The steel" -- you asked about
6    when the steel columns will be there, and he says,
7    "The steel columns for the door will be here on
8    Friday."
9        A.     Okay.
10       Q.     We don't have to go back and look at it.
11   That's what it says; right?
12       A.     Okay.   I believe you.
13       Q.     Okay.   But they never got a chance to install
14   those, did they?
15       A.     No.
16       Q.     Okay.   So, let's talk about Schulte for a
17   second.    After the termination, we saw where there was
18   communications with Erick Key of Schulte about the
19   tolerances for the building; right?
20       A.     Okay.
21       Q.     And there was also a complete redo of the
22   interior mezzanine structure on the inside of the
23   building; right?
24       A.     All of the interior framing was redone.
25       Q.     Okay.   And you asked Schulte to bid that,

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            195

1    didn't you?
2        A.   No.
3        Q.   What did you ask Schulte to bid?
4        A.   We asked for pricing on additional members
5    that we were going to need.
6        Q.   And it was, what, about $8500.00 worth of
7    stuff?
8 A. I don't remember.
9        Q.   Okay.    And then you knew that Schulte had
10   supplied these big columns as well that were going to
11   go towards this repair of the doors; right?
12       A.   Right.
13       Q.   And you knew Schulte hadn't been paid for
14   those because they were just now being delivered;
15   right?
16 A. I'm assuming.    Yeah.
17       Q.   Okay.    And so, when you asked Schulte to bid
18   those, did Erick Key send you back a proposal?
19 A. I don't know.    Did he?
20       Q.   Exhibit 93, if you look at it.
21       A.   (Witness complying.)
22       Q.   Okay.    It says that, "Attached is the
23   proposal for the replacement material for the hangar
24   in Uvalde.    Please have the erector verify quantities
25   and materials.    He says he can have this material

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 196

1    delivered the week of the 22nd," which this is in
2    April.    "To be able to do this, we have to get all the
3    outstanding balances that are owed to Schulte Building
4    Systems for this job paid for.        We need to get this
5    resolved before any fabrication can take place."         Did
6    I read that correctly?
7        A.     Correct.
8        Q.     And what was your response to Mr. Key at
9    Schulte Building Systems?       Did you get him paid?
10 A. I don't remember what my response is.
11       Q.     You never got him paid, did you?
12       A.     No, I don't think so.
13       Q.     Instead, you ordered the material from
14   somebody else; right?
15 A. I probably did.
16       Q.     Did you ever tell Mr. Key that you weren't
17   going to use his services and why?
18       A.     No.
19       Q.     Now, you mentioned that there was this
20   material that was out there.       Do you know what
21   happened to it?
22       A.     Yeah.   The material that was originally
23   delivered was -- was cut down in the field to modify
24   the dimension that wasn't right.        But we weren't
25   told --

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 197

1        Q.     What happened to it?
2 A. I don't know.    The -- once you take a rafter
3    and cut it, it's not much good to anybody.
4        Q.     What about the -- the stuff that Schulte had
5    sent that hadn't been used yet?
6 A. I don't know.
7        Q.     Okay.   If you would, turn the page to
8    Exhibit 94.
9        A.     (Witness complying.)
10       Q.     April 15th, this is right after Erick Key
11   says, yeah, we've got part of our order, but we're not
12   -- in fact, there's the orders down there at the
13   bottom of Exhibit 94.      It's orders 79497 through
14   80608.    But the e-mail at the top is from Daniel
15   Boddie to you and it says, "We are probably going to
16   use 80323 since it is already on-site.       But we still
17   lack the final pieces for doors.      The other stuff is
18   all laying in a giant pile of metal next to the
19   hangar.   Rod instructed Lingo to put it somewhere safe
20   on the ranch to use at some point in the future."
21   Does that refresh your recollection about what
22   happened to all that --
23 A. It was -- it was -- most of it was scrap.
24       Q.     Then why would Rod instruct that it be put
25   somewhere safe on the ranch so that it could be used

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            198

1    at some point in the future?
2        A.    Because Rod saves everything.     I mean, from
3    leftover rock to --
4        Q.    And he didn't -- and he didn't pay for it,
5    did he?
6 A. I don't know if he did or not.
7        Q.    You know that Schulte didn't get paid.
8        A.    Well, then --
9        Q.    Did they?
10       A.    No -- I don't know.    Did SBS pay them?
11       Q.    Do you know if anybody got paid for the
12   materials that Schulte left?
13 A. I don't -- I'm assuming not.
14       Q.    Did you or anybody that you know of reject
15   any of the material that was delivered?
16       A.    No.
17       Q.    Was any of it sent back --
18       A.    No.
19       Q.    -- to the person that supplied it?
20       A.    No.
21       Q.    The inventory that Mr. Robertson had dropped
22   off, did you send it back?
23       A.    No.
24       Q.    And apparently, it was kept by Mr. Lewis.
25                   MR. CLARK:   Your Honor, at this time I'll

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  199

1    pass the witness.
2                    THE COURT:    Mr. Slates?
3                    MR. SLATES:    Your Honor, would this be an
4    opportune point for a quick break, or should I go
5    ahead?
6                    THE COURT:    How long -- okay.    We'll take
7    a 15-minute break now.       Okay.   Then we'll work until
8    5:00 after that.    You can step down, Mr. Pittman.
9                    THE WITNESS:    Yes, sir.
10                   THE COURT:    Almost through.
11                   (Recess taken.)
12                   THE COURT:    Y'all have a seat.   Go ahead,
13   Mr. Slates.
14                   MR. SLATES:    Thank you, Your Honor.
15                         CROSS-EXAMINATION
16   BY MR. SLATES:
17       Q.   I don't know if you still have your exhibit
18   book open to SBS 94.     It's the document you were
19   looking at with Mr. Clark right before we broke.
20       A.   Yes, sir.
21       Q.   What does your e-mail to Mr. Boddie say on
22   April 15th, 2013, the second e-mail in the sequence
23   from the top?
24 A. I asked him, "Do we need any of this?"         And
25   then I said, "It's out of spec anyway."

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             200

1        Q.   What does that mean, it's out of spec anyway?
2        A.   That there was no way to reuse any of it.   It
3    had been cut; it had been compromised.
4        Q.   Okay.   I just wanted to cover that while we
5    were on the topic.   I want to change topics now,
6    actually, and go back to the questions that were
7    presented to you this morning from Mr. Brown about the
8    circumstances surrounding your decision that you
9    needed to make a change in the electrical
10   subcontractor.   Okay?
11       A.   Okay.
12       Q.   Mr. Brown asked a number of questions about
13   whether or not you ever communicated with Robertson,
14   either with Jerrod Robertson or anyone else.   Do you
15   recall those questions?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   Is it appropriate in your experience for an
18   owner to have direct communications with a
19   subcontractor?
20       A.   No.
21       Q.   Who should your communications be with?
22       A.   The general contractor.
23       Q.   Do you know whether the contract between you
24   and SBS actually requires that?
25       A.   Yes.

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             201

1        Q.   Let's take a look at it.     If you look at
2    Robertson's Exhibit Number 17, I want to direct your
3    attention to section 4.2.4, which is on page 18.
4 A. 17?
5        Q.   18.    "Communications facilitating contract
6    administration."
7        A.   Okay.
8        Q.   You can see it on the TV there.
9        A.   Yes.
10       Q.   Take a moment to read that and just tell me
11   if this is a provision that, in fact, requires you
12   contractually to communicate with SBS and not
13   Robertson, as you understand it.
14       A.   (Witness complying.)
15       Q.   If I could expedite things along, I'm focused
16   on the last sentence of that paragraph.
17       A.   Communication by and with separate
18   contractors shall be through the owner.
19       Q.   "Shall be through the contractor"; correct?
20   "Communications by and with subcontractors and
21   material suppliers shall be through the contractor."
22       A.   Yes, sir.   I'm sorry.
23       Q.   So, in your mind, were you complying with the
24   contract by communicating with SBS rather than
25   Robertson specifically?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            202

1        A.   Yes, sir.
2        Q.   Did you convey concerns about Robertson's
3    manpower on the job to SBS?
4        A.   Many times.
5        Q.   Do you know whether they passed those along
6    to Robertson or not?
7        A.   No.
8        Q.   If they didn't, would that have been a
9    failure on their part in your mind?
10       A.   Yes.
11       Q.   In your experience in the industry, do
12   general contractors not like it when you communicate
13   directly with their subcontractors?
14       A.   Yes, they do not.
15       Q.   When you've been in that role of the general
16   contractor, how would you react if an owner
17   communicated directly with your subs?
18       A.   Negatively.
19       Q.   I want to look at specifically manpower on
20   this job for Robertson based on the daily reports
21   Robertson introduced into the record in this case.    If
22   you'll turn with me to 19 of Robertson's exhibits.
23   That's the thinner set.
24       A.   (Witness complying.)
25       Q.   Are you with me?

                       TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                      PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                           203

1        A.     Yes, sir.
2        Q.     Okay.   I want you to tell me if my notes are
3    correct.   19-A is 12/18; is that correct?
4        A.     Yes, sir.
5        Q.     Zero people on site; correct?
6        A.     Correct.
7        Q.     19-B is 12/19, two people on-site; correct?
8        A.     Correct.
9        Q.     19-C is 12/20, two people on-site; correct?
10       A.     Correct.
11       Q.     "D" is 1/2, one person on-site; correct?
12       A.     Correct.
13       Q.     "E" is 1/3, one person on-site; is that
14   correct?
15       A.     Yes, sir.
16       Q.     "F," 1/4, one person on-site; correct?
17       A.     Correct.
18       Q.     "G," 1/7, one person on-site?
19       A.     Yes, sir.
20       Q.     "H," 1/8, one person on site; correct?
21       A.     Correct.
22       Q.     "I," 1/15, zero for Robertson; correct?
23       A.     Correct.
24       Q.     "J," 1/21, zero for Robertson; correct?
25       A.     Correct.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               204

1        Q.    "K," 1/22, zero for Robertson; correct?
2        A.    Correct.
3        Q.    And "L," 1/23, the day they were terminated,
4    zero for Robertson; correct?
5        A.    Correct.
6        Q.    Does that look like the appropriate staffing
7    given the scope of the electrical work on this project
8    based on your experience in the construction industry?
9        A.    No.
10                    MR. CLARK:   Your Honor, I'm going to
11   object to -- he's not been designated to testify as an
12   expert.
13                    THE COURT:   Overruled.
14       Q.    (BY MR. SLATES)      Were you personally
15   satisfied as the owner's representative on this
16   project with that level of manpower for this project?
17       A.    No.
18       Q.    Let's talk about the bids that you got from
19   Robertson and from C&S.       Take a moment to look back at
20   Tri-Bar 25, which is in the big black binder.        Do you
21   recall looking at that with Mr. Clark this morning?
22 A. 25?
23       Q.    Yes, sir.
24       A.    Yes.
25       Q.    It's the inquiry about potential notice of a

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 205

1    lien -- now, is that a lien or is that a notice of a
2    lien?
3        A.     That's a notice for an intent to file.
4        Q.     Does that happen pretty regularly on a
5    construction job, in your experience?
6        A.     Yes.
7        Q.     The implication was made -- or let me ask
8    you, did you feel like the implication was being made
9    that there was some correlation between you getting
10   this notification that there might be a lien notice
11   and your e-mail, which is SBS Exhibit 26, in which you
12   say you want to make a change?
13       A.     Yes.
14       Q.     Do you recall that?
15       A.     Yes, sir.
16       Q.     All right.     I wanted -- let's look at the
17   timing here, if we can.       Exhibit Number 25 is an
18   e-mail dated Monday, January 14th at 1:28 p.m.;
19   correct?
20       A.     Correct.
21       Q.     And the next one, Exhibit 26 of SBS, is an
22   e-mail dated 3:52 p.m.
23       A.     Yes.
24       Q.     Do you remember what happened in between
25   those two time frames?       Let me help you out.   Let's

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                206

1    look at Tri-Bar Exhibit Number 44.       Are you in the --
2    should be the white book.
3        A.    Okay.
4        Q.    And can you see on the TV?
5        A.    Oh, yes.
6        Q.    Same day; right?
7        A.    Yes, sir.
8        Q.    January 14th at 2:39 p.m. in between those
9    two e-mails; correct?
10       A.    Correct.
11       Q.    What did you get from C&S at 2:39 p.m.?
12 A. I got a price for the scope of work for the
13   change order.
14       Q.    And you had already received, we saw this
15   morning in Robertson's Exhibit 4-A, a bid for
16   $60,000.00 roughly; correct?
17       A.    Correct.
18       Q.    Let's get some timing down here as well.      I
19   believe, if I remember correctly, Exhibit 4-A, you got
20   the initial number in December -- I want to say it was
21   the 14th, perhaps; let's double-check; yes --
22   December 14th, you get the 60,000; right?
23       A.    Correct.
24       Q.    And then 4-B was the revised number of
25   56,000.   That was January 8th.      Do you recall that?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               207

1        A.    Yes, sir.
2        Q.    Then you get a bid from C&S that's
3    $21,119.00?
4        A.    Yes, sir.
5        Q.    So, as of January 14th, you have two bids
6    from Robertson; one for 60, one for 56, and one bid
7    from C&S for 21,000.     Is that the state of events at
8    that time?
9        A.    Yes, sir.    Yes, sir.
10       Q.    So, you got a bid from Robertson roughly
11   three times -- at least two and a half times, even
12   after revised -- the bid you got from C&S.     Did it
13   seem to you like Robertson's bid was the right bid to
14   go with, if you're reporting the best interest of the
15   owner?
16       A.    Absolutely not.
17       Q.    And just to go back -- we talked about this
18   this morning.     The $72,000.00 number, what does that
19   represent?    I think you said it was the base contract
20   work; is that right?
21       A.    Yeah.    Actually, this is base contract with
22   the change order.
23       Q.    Well --
24       A.    No.   Pardon me.   It doesn't have the change
25   order.   This is just the base contract amount that --

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   208

1    from the original set of documents.
2        Q.     All right.     Just so we're all together and
3    I'm not confused, I think the base is the 26,000 in
4    labor, the 46,000 in material.         That gets you to 72;
5    right?
6        A.     Correct.
7        Q.     And then the 21 is a separate number?
8 A. Is an add.     Yeah.
9        Q.     So, we talked about apples and oranges this
10   morning.   If we're going to compare apples to apples,
11   the apples are this.       Robertson's base contract was
12   $128,000.00; right?
13       A.     Right.
14                  MR. BROWN:      Your Honor, I'm going to
15   object at this point.       I've given him a little leeway,
16   but he's clearly leading his witness at this time.
17                  THE COURT:      Don't lead your witness,
18   Counsel.
19                  MR. SLATES:        Fair enough.
20       Q.     (BY MR. SLATES)     What was the amount of
21   Robertson's subcontract; do you recall?
22 A. It was 120 and change.
23       Q.     And how does that compare to the --
24       A.     Significant -- significantly higher than the
25   76,000 that we got from C&S.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               209

1        Q.     And to compare the other apple to the apple,
2    what was the amount of the change order?
3        A.     The change order was -- from Robertson
4    initially was over -- a little over 60,000.     We asked
5    for them to go back because I felt it was extremely
6    too high for the amount of work they were doing.     But
7    keep in mind, that was almost half of their contract
8    amount for a bit of changes.      And then -- then they
9    came back with another number, and I still didn't feel
10   good about it.   And that's when I asked C&S, price the
11   original contract and price the change order.
12       Q.     And let me ask you a general question.   Is it
13   important for you, as the owner's representative, to
14   try to manage the cost on a project?
15       A.     Yes, sir.
16       Q.     Did you develop some understanding, based on
17   your dealings with Rod Lewis, as to whether or not he
18   expected that of you?
19       A.     Yes, sir, he did.
20       Q.     Did you want to try to minimize the cost of
21   the project to the extent that it wouldn't compromise
22   quality?
23       A.     Without a doubt.
24       Q.     Had you worked with C&S before?
25       A.     Many years; over 20.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            210

1        Q.    Had you found them to be a quality contractor
2    -- electrical contractor?
3        A.    They are.
4        Q.    And had you had a positive or negative
5    experience with Robertson at that point?
6        A.    Very negative.
7        Q.    Because of the manpower issues or because of
8    other issues?
9        A.    No.   The -- the initial issue that I had with
10   them was they didn't man the job properly.    There was
11   -- they were never there with enough staff to get
12   things done.
13       Q.    All right.    Did you believe that you had the
14   right, under your contract with SBS, to require them
15   to make a change in the electrical subcontractor?
16 A. I did.
17       Q.    Have you worked with the AIA form contracts
18   before?
19       A.    Many years.
20       Q.    I want to take a look at another provision.
21   We looked at 4.2.4 earlier.    Let's go back to Robinson
22   -- Robertson 17.   Have you got it?
23       A.    Yes, sir.
24       Q.    I want to direct your attention to paragraph
25   5.3 of that document, which is on page 19.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              211

1           A.   Yes, sir.
2           Q.   It says, "By appropriate agreement, written
3    where legally required for validity, the contractor
4    shall require each subcontractor to the extent of the
5    work to be performed by the subcontractor to be bound
6    to the contractor by terms of the contract documents
7    and to assume toward the contractor all the
8    obligations and responsibilities including the
9    responsibility for safety of the subcontractor's work
10   which the contractor, by these documents, assumes
11   towards the owner and architect."
12                      Is it your understanding, based on your
13   experience, that that provision flows down, so to
14   speak, the obligations of the general conditions to
15   the subcontractor; or at least requires the general
16   contractor to include the provision that accomplishes
17   that?
18          A.   Yes.
19          Q.   Okay.    And was it your understanding that SBS
20   had complied with that provision?
21          A.   Yes, it was.
22          Q.   Did you have any reason to believe they had
23   not?
24          A.   No.
25          Q.   Are the -- and just to be clear, if we look

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 212

1    at section 1.1.1 of the general conditions, the
2    contract documents definition; does it include the AIA
3    general conditions?      Look here.
4        A.     Yes.    The general and supplemented.
5        Q.     I think you said earlier you haven't seen the
6    SBS subcontract before.        Do I recall your testimony
7    correctly?
8        A.     Yes, sir.
9        Q.     Okay.    I'll wait to ask Mr. Robertson about
10   that.    Given these provisions, did you believe that
11   you had the legal right to require SBS to make a
12   change in the electrical subcontracting?
13                     MR. BROWN:   I'm going to object at least
14   as to the legal conclusion.        I'll object on that
15   basis.   I don't think he has --
16                     THE COURT:   As the general on the
17   project, did he believe he had a right under the
18   contract to terminate?
19                     THE WITNESS:    Yes.
20                     THE COURT:   Okay.
21       Q.     (BY MR. SLATES)       And did you believe that by
22   asking SBS to do so, you were putting SBS in a
23   position where they would be in breach of their
24   subcontract with Robertson?
25       A.     Yes.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            213

1        Q.   Let me ask you the question again.     It might
2    not have been clear.     The question is that --
3                   MR. BROWN:   No, it was clear.
4        Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)     The question is this.   Did
5    you believe that asking SBS to make a change from
6    Robertson would mean that SBS would be in breach of
7    its subcontract with Robertson?
8        A.   Oh, no.   No.    Not a breach.
9        Q.   Did -- when you went to SBS and asked them to
10   make a change, did they say, well, wait a minute, we
11   can't do that?
12       A.   No.   They had no objection whatsoever.
13       Q.   Did they tell you that it was going to be a
14   breach of their subcontract to do that?
15       A.   No, they did not.
16       Q.   Did you have any basis to believe that asking
17   them to make a change, given the lack of manpower and
18   the gross difference between pricing for the work, was
19   in any way inappropriate?
20 A. I didn't think it was inappropriate at all.
21       Q.   Did you have any malice towards Robertson or
22   was it just a matter of getting the project built?
23 A. I -- I don't know Robertson.
24       Q.   Did you have -- setting aside the contract
25   for a moment, let's ignore what your rights legally

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               214

1    may have been.    Did you at least have a good faith
2    belief that you had the right to ask SBS to make a
3    change in the electrical subcontractor?
4        A.    Yes, I did.
5        Q.    All right.    I want to change gears now and
6    talk about schedule issues on the project in general.
7    If we can go to Robertson Exhibit Number 15.    I want
8    to direct your attention to section 4.3, which is on
9    page 3.   The contract we -- just to give some context
10   here, look at the first page.     It was dated the 17th
11   of May 2012; correct?    I'm looking at the top of the
12   first page.
13       A.    Yeah.   Yes, sir.
14       Q.    If we look in 4.3, what does it say is the
15   scheduled final completion date?
16 A. 7th of December 2012.
17       Q.    Did that schedule get met?
18       A.    No.
19       Q.    Let's look at Tri-Bar Exhibit Number 33.
20   That's in the bigger binder.    What is that?   Okay.
21   This is a schedule for the project; correct?
22       A.    Yes, sir.
23       Q.    And if we looked at line item number 14, what
24   is that line item?
25       A.    Detail, fabricate, and deliver steel.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               215

1        Q.   And can we see what the scheduled delivery
2    date is for that?    August 7th, 2012?
3        A.   August 7th, 2012.
4        Q.   Was the metal building delivered on
5    August 7th, 2012?
6        A.   No.
7        Q.   Let's go to Tri-Bar Exhibit Number 35.       This
8    is a revised schedule for the project.       And who do
9    these schedules come from, just to be clear?
10       A.   From SBS.
11       Q.   Did you make this schedule?
12       A.   No.
13       Q.   Was it your understanding that when they
14   provided this to you that they were committing to meet
15   this schedule?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   If you look at line item number 19, it's the
18   same line item.   Detail, fabricate, and deliver steel.
19   And what date do we see?
20       A.   October 18th.
21       Q.   Okay.    Did they meet that schedule?
22       A.   No.
23       Q.   What were they telling you and Mr. Grable, if
24   you were present for those conversations, about their
25   ability to make those delivery dates?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               216

1        A.   Well, originally, they told us when we made
2    the hangar modification that it was not going to
3    impact the schedule.   And then as it went, there was
4    always another excuse or another reason why they had
5    to extend that number.   And it kept being extended and
6    extended.   As you can see, that's a three month -- or
7    two and a half month extension right there.
8        Q.   If we look at Tri-Bar Exhibit Number 36, what
9    is -- it looks like you got a copy of this report; is
10   that correct?
11       A.   Yes, sir.
12       Q.   And that you were present?
13       A.   Yes, sir.
14       Q.   What was SBS representing at this time, as
15   far as their ability to make those delivery dates, if
16   you look at item number 3?
17       A.   They were still on target with the main steel
18   frame delivery on-site October 15th.       This matches
19   current updated schedule.    Erection will begin the
20   same week of delivery.
21       Q.   Let's look at SBS Exhibit Number 63, one of
22   the documents Mr. Clark asked you about this morning,
23   back into the black binder.
24       A.   Which number?
25       Q.   63.

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                217

1           A.     Yes, sir.
2           Q.     All right.   I want to call your attention to
3    the third page of that exhibit -- actually, the bottom
4    of the second page, top of the third page.        There's an
5    e-mail from Mr. Grable to Mr. Lewis with a copy to
6    you.    And he makes reference to, "An effort to
7    ascertain the real schedule of building delivery; not
8    inconsistent and incorrect delivery dates provided by
9    SBS."       Do you see that?
10          A.     Yes, sir.
11          Q.     If you look at the top of the next page --
12   first at the bottom of that page, he said he made
13   contact with Schulte.        And then at the top of the
14   second page, what did he find out from -- from
15   Schulte?      Starting with, "Building supplier stated."
16   Can you see that?
17          A.     Yeah.   It said, "Builder supplier stated
18   overcommitment on their part has exceeded their
19   capacity to provide a timely delivery of the building
20   product.      Their response was honest and
21   straightforward, leaving us befuddled by SBS's
22   responses to their specific delivery dates."
23          Q.     Let's look at Robertson now; Exhibit Number
24   32.    This morning Mr. Brown asked you -- had you focus
25   in on one sentence in this exhibit.         It's over on the

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 218

1    third page.
2 A. I'm sorry, John.    I can't get this --
3          Q.   It's in -- I think it's in -- I think that's
4    SBS you got.   It's going to be this one.
5          A.   Okay.
6                   THE COURT:     It's easier to read off
7    there, Mr. Pittman.
8                   THE WITNESS:     Oh, yes sir.
9                   THE COURT:     For me, it is.
10                  THE WITNESS:     Yeah.   Much easier.
11         Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)    All right.    So, I'm on the
12   e-mail -- the 28th e-mail -- here we go.       So, do you
13   recall this morning that Mr. Brown asked you to focus
14   in on this sentence that says, "The hangar building is
15   beautiful and fits well with the land"?        Do you
16   remember that?
17         A.   Yes, sir.
18         Q.   You didn't get a chance to read the rest of
19   this e-mail string this morning.        But if you take some
20   time to look at it, I think you'll see that everything
21   is not all wonderful in hangar land at this time, is
22   it?
23         A.   No, not at all.
24         Q.   In that same e-mail, he makes reference to
25   you having stated that, "Under no circumstances will

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  219

1    we allow only two workers on-site.       Only full staff is
2    acceptable."
3        A.    Correct.
4        Q.    Is this consistent with your other testimony
5    about the ongoing problems with manpower and staffing?
6        A.    Yes, sir.
7        Q.    Were you conveying that to SBS at that time?
8        A.    Yes, I was.     That's why I followed up.
9        Q.    And then even in the following sentence, Mr.
10   Grable says, "Not the way it has progressed thus far
11   with the PEMB building delay."       Do you see that?
12       A.    Yes.
13       Q.    Was that a major issue for you and Mr.
14   Grable?
15       A.    Well, yeah.     It affected the overall
16   schedule.
17       Q.    And was --
18       A.    The critical path was all PEMB.
19       Q.    Was Mr. -- was Mr. Lewis happy at the time?
20       A.    Not at all.
21       Q.    Let's look at the first page of that e-mail.
22   This is from Mr. Lewis on November 25th to Tony.        It
23   says he was visiting the project last week and noticed
24   that it is really still in slow motion.       Only three
25   guys working on erecting the building and going very

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               220

1    slow.    Do you see that?
2        A.     Yes, sir.
3        Q.     Is that consistent with your understanding of
4    conditions at the time?
5        A.     Yes, sir.
6        Q.     If you look down at the -- the bottom
7    paragraph, "To me, what I witnessed over a couple of
8    days last week, it's still a shoddy operation.     They
9    did not have the proper lifting equipment or cranes to
10   make the job go smoothly and they were basically
11   shimming the metal runners foot by foot along the
12   trusses to place them, wasting a lot of time."     Is
13   that also consistent with what you were seeing on the
14   project?
15       A.     Yes, sir.
16       Q.     Were you concerned at this point in time
17   about SBS's ability to complete this project?
18 A. I was very concerned about it.
19       Q.     Did you begin considering options for what to
20   do if they continued to fail to meet your
21   expectations?
22 A. I had to.   I did.
23       Q.     Did you feel like you had a responsibility to
24   consider those options?
25       A.     Yes, sir.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   221

1           Q.   What options did you consider?
2           A.   Well, we considered every option in the sense
3    of whether we were going to bring in another
4    contractor, whether we were going to bring in another
5    general contractor, or we were going to finish it
6    ourselves.    And I felt that it would have been more
7    cost effective to finish it ourselves and try to use
8    what was -- if anything, we could.
9           Q.   At that time did you believe the termination
10   was appropriate?
11          A.   Yes, sir.
12          Q.   Did you communicate that to Rod Lewis?
13 A. I did.
14          Q.   Did he agree with you?
15          A.   No.   He wanted to try to -- initially, he
16   wanted -- when I wanted to terminate at first, Rod
17   didn't want to.      He wanted to try to work something
18   out.    It wasn't until later on that he agreed that it
19   was time to -- because he was very unhappy.
20          Q.   We saw earlier this morning -- I won't go
21   back to it, but just to reference it -- the
22   solicitation of bids in SBS Exhibit Number 65 on
23   October 31st where you were out there looking to get
24   people to give you prices to finish.          Do you recall
25   that?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             222

1        A.   Yes, sir.
2        Q.   Was that part of that process of considering
3    your options?
4        A.   Yes, sir.   I didn't want to have to get
5    forced into the position of terminating and not having
6    a game plan.
7        Q.   What would that have done to the schedule?
8 A. It was already catastrophic what we had to
9    deal with.   It was so grossly behind schedule.   And
10   then had we not had a game plan, we would have been
11   further behind.
12       Q.   Would it be prudent for an owner or an
13   owner's representative to consider terminating a
14   general contractor without exploring other options for
15   how to complete the project if, in fact, it came to
16   that?
17       A.   Not in my -- not in my opinion.    I'm the
18   expert that works for Rod Lewis.    And if I'm going to
19   terminate somebody, I'm going to have a game plan in
20   place or an idea of where we're going to go forward.
21       Q.   Let's look back at -- we saw this one this
22   morning, too, but I do want to revisit it -- Tri-Bar
23   46 in the white binder.   Just go off the TV.
24 A. I'm going to have to look at this one.
25       Q.   This is where you've asked John Grable to put

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              223

1    them on notice of, again, inadequate manpower.       Do you
2    recall looking at that this morning?
3        A.   Yes, sir.
4        Q.   Is this -- was this a problem that had been
5    going on for months at this point?
6        A.   Yes.
7        Q.   Was there ever a point in the project where
8    you believed they were meeting your expectations, as
9    far as staffing?
10       A.   No.
11       Q.   Let's go to the meeting minutes, Exhibit
12   Number 48.   That's Tri-Bar 48.     Do you recall looking
13   at this this morning?
14       A.   Yes, sir.
15       Q.   Mr. Clark focused your attention on a few
16   select sentences, but you all didn't read every
17   sentence, did you?
18       A.   No, sir.
19       Q.   And do you recall Mr. Clark saying there was
20   nothing in this document that indicated any reason for
21   terminating SBS, other than the first sentence that
22   said, "Met with Rod.     He wants to terminate the
23   contract"?
24       A.   Yes, sir.
25       Q.   What do you say on this line right here?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                224

1           A.    "I felt that we gave every chance and a lot
2    of delays."
3           Q.    And were those delays, in your mind, a result
4    of failure to adequately man the job?
5           A.    Yes.   Part of it.
6           Q.    So, to represent that there is nothing in
7    here that indicates a justification for delay, do you
8    still believe that that testimony is accurate?
9           A.    Oh, yeah.    In fact, Steve Schiffman says,
10   "Okay.      We're disappointed, but we understand part of
11   it."
12          Q.    Did you believe that there was any question,
13   based on your interaction with SBS, about their
14   appreciating the fact that they were being terminated
15   because of failure to hit the schedule and failure to
16   adequately man the job?
17          A.    Yes.   In fact, they go on to say that, you
18   know, this wasn't their finest hour.
19          Q.    Let's see.    Did you believe at that point
20   that you had justification to terminate SBS for
21   cause?
22          A.    Yes, I did.
23          Q.    And you understand the difference between a
24   termination for cause and a termination for
25   convenience?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               225

1        A.   Yes, sir.
2        Q.   Let's look at the contract.        Back to
3    Robertson Exhibit Number 17.    All right.     So, 14.2 is
4    termination by the owner for cause.     And if you look
5    specifically at 14.2.3 and 14.2.4, what does that say
6    about whether or not you have to pay the general
7    contractor when you terminate for cause?
8        A.   "When the owner terminates the contract for
9    one of the reasons stated in section 14.2.1, the
10   contractor shall not be entitled to receive further
11   payment until the work is finished."
12       Q.   Let's look at 14.4.1.     And actually,
13   specifically, 14.4.3.    What does it say with respect
14   to payment to the contractor in the event of a
15   termination for convenience?
16 A. 14.4.3?
17       Q.   Yes, sir.
18       A.   "In cases such as termination for the owner's
19   convenience, the contractor should be entitled to
20   receive payment for work executed and cost incurred by
21   reason of such termination along with reasonable
22   overhead and profit on work not executed."
23       Q.   So, it's your understanding that payment is
24   required at the time of termination if you terminate
25   for cause?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 226

1          A.   For convenience.     Yes.
2          Q.   All right.     Let's go back to Exhibit Number
3    48.   And I want to call your attention to the second
4    page of that.   You looked at this this morning with
5    Mr. Clark.   You said -- the question was, can you sign
6    releases?    You said, absolutely.      Contractually, we
7    don't have to pay you until the project is finished.
8    Is that a termination for cause or a termination for
9    convenience, in your mind?
10         A.   Cause.
11         Q.   And did you intend this to be a termination
12   for cause?
13         A.   Yes, I did.
14         Q.   Why did you tell them you were going to pay
15   them if you knew that the contract didn't require you
16   to do that until the project was finished if this was
17   a termination for cause?
18         A.   Well, you know, we didn't want to make this
19   painful -- or as less painful as possible.       I mean, we
20   had every intention of paying them any money due.       And
21   I made it plain that that's what we were going to do.
22         Q.   Did you know about the defects at the time
23   you made those statements?
24         A.   No, sir.
25         Q.   Had you known about the defects, would you

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             227

1    have told them that you were going to get them paid?
2          A.   No.
3          Q.   What would you have told them if you had
4    known about the defects at that point?
5          A.   We would have said there was several items
6    that need to be done; need to be fixed; need to be
7    repaired.   It's not in the best interest to get SBS
8    back on the project because they were nonperforming
9    from the get-go.    And we felt that a clean break would
10   have been necessary.
11         Q.   All right.    We're not going to pull this back
12   up.   But do you recall this morning that Mr. Brown
13   showed you the justifications for a termination for
14   cause; and the first one on that list under 14.2.1 of
15   Robertson Exhibit Number 17 was, "Repeatedly fails or
16   refuses to supply enough properly skilled workers or
17   proper material."      Do you remember that?
18         A.   Yes, sir.
19         Q.   Did you believe that SBS had repeatedly
20   failed or refused to supply enough properly skilled
21   workers or proper material on this project?
22         A.   Yes.
23         Q.   At any time did Mr. Grable indicate that he
24   did not believe that a termination was justified?
25         A.   No.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   228

1           Q.   You -- you were asked questions this morning
2    about a certification.         You don't have a
3    certification -- don't have a formal certification, do
4    you?
5           A.   No.
6           Q.   Did you have conversations with Mr. Grable
7    about whether termination was justified?
8           A.   They --
9                      MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, I'm going to
10   object.     This is going to be hearsay.
11                     THE COURT:    Overruled.
12          Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)      Let's look at -- there is a
13   requirement, if we look down a little further in
14   14.2.3 -- oh, I'm sorry -- 14.2.2.           It says you're
15   supposed to give written notice.        See that?
16          A.   Yes, sir.
17          Q.   We spent a bunch of time this morning talking
18   about that.       Do you recall that?
19          A.   Yes, I did.
20          Q.   Do you see anywhere in there where it says
21   that notice gives the contractor an opportunity to
22   cure?
23          A.   No.
24          Q.   Is there anything, once an owner has made the
25   decision to terminate for cause, that a contractor can

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   229

1    do to stop that?
2        A.     No.
3        Q.     Does the notice, in your mind, have any
4    substantive effect other than to let them know what's
5    coming?
6        A.     No, not really.    I mean, we -- we spoke often
7    about this.
8        Q.     And let's get back to Exhibit Number 48.       I
9    want to point out a couple of those comments.       But I
10   want to just focus on -- on the first page, this is
11   Steve.    Who is Steve?
12       A.     Schiffman.
13       Q.     It says, "Okay.    We're disappointed.   We
14   understand part of it."      If we look down, Steve again
15   says, "Not seeing the best side of SBS Construction
16   for many reasons."      Do you see that?
17       A.     Yes, sir.
18       Q.     If we go down to -- I believe it's on the
19   second page.     Said -- this is Mr. Schiffman again
20   talking.   It says, "I visited the job yesterday and I
21   understand we're up front and forthright people.         We
22   had some problems.      We are truly sorry about it."    Do
23   you see that?
24       A.     Yes, sir.
25       Q.     Does that sound like someone that is

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            230

1    surprised that they're being terminated?
2        A.   Not at all.
3        Q.   Does it sound like someone that is protesting
4    that the termination isn't justified?
5        A.   No.
6        Q.   Does it sound like someone -- and in fact, do
7    you see anywhere in there where anyone complains about
8    having not received a written notice seven days prior
9    to this meeting?
10       A.   No.
11       Q.   Had you been telling SBS for months that
12   schedule and manpower were a problem?
13       A.   Yes, I had.
14       Q.   And had they taken adequate steps, in your
15   mind, to address your concerns?
16       A.   No.
17       Q.   Let's look at SBS Exhibit Number 12.   This is
18   an e-mail -- or excuse me -- a letter from -- I
19   believe from Mr. Schiffman to you dated February 15th.
20   Do you see that?
21       A.   Yes, sir.
22       Q.   It says, "While we accepted the challenge to
23   deal with the various parties involved and to manage
24   the ongoing design changes, we at SBS obviously did
25   not meet your expectations or the expectations of Mr.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                           231

1    Lewis."   Do you see that?
2        A.    Yes, sir.
3        Q.    Does that sound like someone that's angry or
4    someone that's contrite?
5        A.    Contrite.
6        Q.    Does it sound like someone that's
7    acknowledging responsibility -- or culpability?
8        A.    Culpability.
9        Q.    And do you see anywhere in that letter where
10   Mr. Schiffman complains about having not received the
11   written notice seven days prior to the meeting?
12       A.    No, he did not.
13       Q.    In fact, when did the notice issue get raised
14   relative to you and your team discovering the defects
15   and withholding payment based on those defects?
16       A.    Actually, I just heard about it for the first
17   time today.
18       Q.    So, until today, no one had ever told you
19   that SBS had any issue with having not received
20   notice?
21       A.    Yes, sir.
22       Q.    Is that correct?
23       A.    That's correct.
24       Q.    All right.   So, what did you do at that point
25   in order to try to get the project back on track?

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  232

1        A.     Well, the first thing I did was kind of
2    damage control.   I wanted to make sure that before we
3    released any funds to SBS, that we do a full forensic
4    discovery.   That's why we brought in independent third
5    party contractors to help us evaluate what we had.        We
6    knew we had some issues, but we didn't know they were
7    going to be as extensive as they were.
8        Q.     Who did you hire?    You mentioned Speedway
9    earlier.
10       A.     We hired Speedway.    We hired -- well, we had
11   BoDen contractor -- Daniel and I had worked when he
12   was with Turner Construction.      And so, we brought in
13   -- they bought in a concrete contractor.       They brought
14   in another mason.    They brought in an HVAC guy.      You
15   know, a bunch of different independent contractors.
16       Q.     And what did you begin to find out based on
17   that investigation?
18       A.     Well, the list is pretty extensive.     You
19   know, we found out what we felt were --
20                  MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, I'm going to
21   object on hearsay.    He's not even identifying who
22   these are coming from.
23                  THE COURT:    Just tell us what you have
24   personal knowledge of, sir.
25                  THE WITNESS:     Okay.   Well, we had

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               233

1    personal knowledge of --
2                   THE COURT:    You have personal knowledge
3    of.
4                   THE WITNESS:    Sir?
5                   THE COURT:    You have personal knowledge.
6                   THE WITNESS:    Yeah.    Well, I had personal
7    knowledge of the inspections that were made, the
8    discovery that was made, and the report that was --
9    that was formulated and given.        And so, those -- those
10   were -- we hired Speedway.     We brought in C&S.    We
11   brought in a brick mason, a concrete contractor.
12   There were several other people that we brought in to
13   do this inspection.
14         Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)    Let's look at --
15                  MR. BROWN:    Your Honor, I'm not clear.    I
16   don't know where he's going with this and what he's
17   trying to establish.     But still, I don't know that an
18   adequate foundation was laid to testify as to what
19   he's doing there.    I'm aware of a report, but the
20   culmination of individuals into that report and his
21   role and given the fact that he earlier testified this
22   morning about a report that he did that somehow was
23   not in existence; I'm not clear on how we're able to
24   establish what part is his, what part is theirs, and
25   what part is hearsay.     So, I'm going to object; one of

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                234

1    spoliation, but two, of the fact that I still think
2    there's some hearsay issues.        So, I've got to object.
3        Q.     (BY MR. SLATES)    All right.      I'm going to ask
4    you --
5                   THE COURT:    Wait a minute.      I didn't hear
6    -- I mean, I heard a speech; not really an objection.
7                   MR. BROWN:    Okay.    I said I object, Your
8    Honor, as to the testimony.
9                   THE COURT:    Give me a three-word legal
10   objection.
11                  MR. BROWN:    One, hearsay; two, spoliation
12   on both.
13                  THE COURT:    Because you're testifying as
14   to the contents of the written report that you don't
15   know where it is?
16                  MR. SLATES:    And let me address that --
17                  THE COURT:    Wait.    Let me ask him that.
18   What's the answer to that?
19                  THE WITNESS:    Well, I know that the
20   report was done.
21                  THE COURT:    But they haven't given it to
22   the other side, from what I understand.         Is that
23   correct?
24                  MR. SLATES:    No.    The --
25                  THE COURT:    Okay.    But what you're

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 235

1    testifying from is the contents of a written report;
2    correct?
3                   THE WITNESS:    Yes, sir.
4                   THE COURT:    Okay.   Then the objection is
5    sustained.    You haven't given them the written report?
6                   MR. SLATES:    No, we have.   There's
7    confusion here and I'm trying to clarify it.
8                   THE COURT:    Can you pull up the written
9    report and let's see.
10                  MR. SLATES:    It's Exhibits 19, 20, and 21
11   which they objected to on the basis of hearsay.
12                  MR. BROWN:    There are -- there are two
13   issues that he's trying to get to.       One, Your Honor,
14   is of the contents of the -- whatever it is --
15   Spellway --
16                  THE COURT:    Speedway.
17                  MR. BROWN:    -- Speedway.    That is their
18   -- that report we objected because, one, report not
19   designated, et cetera.      But there's another issue --
20                  THE COURT:    No, no.   Wait a minute.   The
21   focus of everybody's concentration was, you've never
22   seen, didn't know of this written report.
23                  MR. BROWN:    There are two --
24                  THE COURT:    Which report is the one you
25   don't know about?

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               236

1                   MR. BROWN:    We don't know about the one
2    he talked about this morning.
3                   MR. CLARK:    Let me help you out with that
4    one.   That's one of the reports they're talking about,
5    Your Honor.    You see it's written there on the front
6    cover as identified as belonging to Jennifer Swisher,
7    October 18th of 2013.     It's not tied to Mr. Pittman.
8    That's the report that we received.      She's not an
9    expert.   He's not designated as an expert.       That's the
10   report we've got.    I don't know how we're supposed to
11   recognize that as being something he did back in
12   February.
13                  MR. SLATES:    I'm just trying to eliminate
14   the confusion, Your Honor.     I think if I can ask him a
15   handful of questions, it will solve the problem.
16                  THE COURT:    Well, you tell me.    You know
17   the answer.
18                  MR. SLATES:    Yeah.   So, the point is,
19   Jennifer Swisher is the person that compiled this.
20   She had input from Daniel Boddie.      She had input from
21   Tom Pittman.    And they compiled this document that
22   records photographically the conditions --
23                  THE COURT:    Ms. Swisher did; right?
24                  MR. SLATES:    Well, she created the
25   document.   But the photographs and the -- and notes

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                237

1    that you'll see in the document were primarily from
2    Daniel Boddie, perhaps some input from Mr. Pittman.
3    I'd have to ask him to confirm.       But it was Daniel and
4    Jennifer that did most of the -- the actual legwork to
5    create this document.      But this is -- I believe that
6    he can confirm when he talked about the investigation
7    report this morning, it culminated in this.
8                    THE COURT:    Well, that's -- but they --
9    he did not make this report.
10                   THE WITNESS:    Well, I gave --
11                   THE COURT:    Wait a minute.
12                   THE WITNESS:    I'm sorry, sir.
13                   THE COURT:    So, the objection is
14   sustained.
15       Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)       Did you provide input into
16   this report, Mr. Pittman?
17 A. I did.
18       Q.   What type of input did you provide?
19       A.   Well, we oversaw all of the -- the forensic
20   discovery.   Okay.    We oversaw all the work that
21   Speedway did.    We saw, as we uncovered things, you
22   know, discrepancies that are in that report.         We took
23   pictures of it.    We documented every discrepancy and
24   deficiency that we -- that we found and put it in this
25   written report.    I left after that and then Jennifer

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              238

1    and Daniel put this report together.      I was
2    instrumental in getting all of this done.
3        Q.   And just to be clear, when you referred to a
4    report this morning, was it Exhibit 20 and 21 that you
5    were referring to?
6 A. I'm assuming.
7        Q.   You can look at it.    It's --
8                  MR. BROWN:    Your Honor --
9                  THE COURT:    The objection is still
10   sustained, Counsel.
11                 MR. SLATES:   I understand, but --
12                 MR. BROWN:    He didn't prepare --
13                 MR. SLATES:   -- we're not allowed to talk
14   about the report, Your Honor.
15                 THE COURT:    Well, you're talking about
16   the report.
17                 MR. SLATES:   I just wanted to clear up
18   the record as to the implication that there's some
19   document out there that we haven't --
20                 THE COURT:    What you've made clear to me
21   is this Los Cerritos Hangar Deficiencies is the report
22   that everyone was talking about.
23                 MR. SLATES:   Okay.
24                 THE COURT:    Mr. Pittman did not prepare
25   the report, so we're not going into the report.

                       TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                      PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                239

1        Q.    (BY MR. SLATES)     Based on your personal
2    observations and your dealings with Speedway/BoDen and
3    the completion of the project, did you become aware of
4    some defects on the project?
5        A.    Yes, sir.
6        Q.    What defects did you become aware of?
7                    MR. BROWN:    Now, at this point I'm going
8    to renew the objection and --
9                    THE COURT:    Give me a legal objection,
10   Counsel; not a speech.
11                   MR. BROWN:    Hearsay and; two, Judge,
12   attempting to comment on evidence not in the record
13   and --
14                   THE COURT:    But once your client left, he
15   took over as the manager of the construction; correct?
16   So, he, as manager of construction, can denote the
17   defects, if any, that existed; correct?         Not the
18   report.
19                   MR. SLATES:   Yes.     I mean, he --
20                   THE COURT:    Well, I'm asking Mr. Brown.
21                   MR. SLATES:   I'm sorry.
22                   THE COURT:    Sorry.   Right?   He's the one
23   that took over after your client left; correct, for
24   Lewis Energy?    So, your objection is overruled.
25       Q.    (BY MR. SLATES)     What defects did you

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   240

1    personally observe?
2           A.    Well, there was defects with -- there were
3    several defects with the roof that we took pictures
4    of, that I had Speedway take pictures of in detail.
5    The fact that the building -- you can look at the roof
6    line, and it goes like this.       And then right over at
7    the hangar section, it drops off and the rafters slope
8    out like this.     It's -- a picture is worth a thousand
9    words.      And we dug out around the perimeter and found
10   out that sometime -- sometime after our inspection was
11   done that the exterior forms were shifted out over the
12   pad.    And it shows concrete after we dug out that was
13   sitting -- was 10 inches -- or 8 inches thick.          And
14   that it goes to dirt, rather than that grade beam
15   being fully executed and dug out 36 inches.       That was
16   around the full perimeter of the building.        And that
17   -- and those pictures show that and --
18                    MR. SLATES:   I don't know -- is 27
19   admitted?
20                    THE COURT:    Your 27?
21                    MR. SLATES:   Yes, Your Honor.
22                    THE COURT:    No, not preadmitted.
23                    MR. SLATES:   It's structural drawings
24   dated --
25                    THE COURT:    All I have is numbers.

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              241

1                  MR. SLATES:    -- June 26th, 2012.   Do
2    y'all have an objection?
3                  MR. CLARK:     To him testifying about it?
4    Yes.   He's not an expert.
5                  MR. SLATES:    I just want to show him the
6    plans.
7                  MR. CLARK:     To do what?   He's not an
8    expert.
9                  MR. SLATES:    To have him identify the
10   condition he's describing.
11                 MR. CLARK:     He's not been designated as
12   an expert to testify about what the plans mean.
13                 MR. SLATES:    I'm asking him what defects
14   he observed in conjunction with performing his
15   responsibility as the project representative.
16                 THE COURT:     But, Counsel, you're offering
17   a report or something of Speedway.
18                 MR. SLATES:    No.   It's -- it's not
19   Speedway.   It's John Grable's plans for the project.
20                 THE COURT:     And that's the plans which he
21   used in order to pour the --
22                 MR. SLATES:    Actually --
23                 THE COURT:     -- slab or --
24                 MR. SLATES:    -- these are structural, so
25   it's --

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               242

1                    THE COURT:    Okay.
2                    MR. SLATES:   -- Victor de Anda's plans of
3    the project.
4                    THE COURT:    Okay.    You can offer those.
5                    MR. SLATES:   At this time we would offer
6    Tri-Bar 27.
7                    THE COURT:    Formal objections?
8                    MR. BROWN:    I have no objection.
9                    MR. CLARK:    No objection, Your Honor.
10                   THE COURT:    27 is admitted.
11       Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)      All right.    If we can go to
12   the last page of that, what is a brick lug?
13 A. It's just an extension of the exterior beam
14   that the brick or the stone is going to sit on.
15       Q.   Is it this area here?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   And is it -- is it supposed to be sitting --
18   what's all that?
19       A.   That's all concrete.         It's all the way down
20   to the bottom.
21       Q.   All right.    Let me ask you to draw what you
22   actually physically observed relative to what that
23   calls for.
24       A.   What we observed after we dug it open?
25       Q.   Yes.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                243

1                   MR. CLARK:    Your Honor, Mr. Pittman has
2    not been designated as an expert.      They do have an
3    expert, Daniel Boddie.      If we're going to hear this
4    twice, I'd just as soon hear it from the expert.        So,
5    I'm objecting on the grounds that he's not an expert.
6    What he's about to draw --
7                   THE COURT:    What is his expertise in
8    structural engineering?
9                   MR. SLATES:    I'm not asking him an
10   opinion.   I'm asking what he physically --
11                  THE COURT:    Well, you asked him to draw
12   the structural design for a purpose; right?
13                  MR. SLATES:    I'm asking him to draw what
14   he physically observed in the field.
15                  MR. CLARK:    Okay.   I don't have an
16   objection to that, Your Honor.
17                  THE COURT:    Okay.   Draw what you saw in
18   the field.   Draw the trees around it, too.
19       A.     Okay.   Basically, when we went around the
20   perimeter of the building -- and those pictures detail
21   -- they accurately depict this.      We dug this out and
22   we found out that this -- this form that should have
23   been here was shifted out to here, you know,
24   approximately several inches, to where when we dug
25   this out, that brick lug was sitting on -- that

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             244

1    consisted of about 8 inches of concrete.    It wasn't
2    bearing down so -- through supplemental structural
3    instructions, SSI from Victor de Anda, he -- we came
4    back in and added into this -- doweled into the
5    existing grade beam and gave a structural brick lug.
6        Q.   (BY MR. SLATES)    Prior to that having been
7    done, what was underneath the brick lug?
8        A.   Dirt.
9        Q.   What do the plans show is supposed to be
10   underneath the brick lug?
11       A.   Concrete.
12       Q.   Okay.   Let's look at SBS Exhibit Number 16.
13   Actually, before we go there, let me ask you a
14   question.   You were asked this morning about your
15   physical observation.   When you observed the forms,
16   were they in the same plane as the grade beam or were
17   they shifted out like you just described?
18       A.   No.   They were in the same plane.
19       Q.   When you saw the pour after it was done,
20   could you tell whether or not the edge of the
21   foundation was over the grade beam?
22       A.   No.   I mean, we didn't -- no.    You can't --
23   there would have been no way to determine, unless we
24   would have x-rayed those grade beams.
25       Q.   The suggestion that you knew that the brick

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              245

1    lug wasn't sitting over the grade beam, which I think
2    was implied this morning, is that true?
3        A.   No.   We had no knowledge of that.      That grade
4    beam wouldn't have been integral with the -- or the
5    brick lug wouldn't have been integral with the grade
6    beam.
7        Q.   All right.    Let's -- specifically in Exhibit
8    Number 16, it's a March 15th letter from John Grable
9    to Jack Green with a copy to you.    "I'm writing this
10   letter to alert you to recent discoveries concerning
11   the structural foundation.   It appears that the
12   perimeter masonry lug that's required to support the
13   20-foot high tall stone here is only 10 inches deep
14   and not the specified 3-foot depth."       Is that a
15   reference to --
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   -- the brick lug that --
18       A.   Yeah.
19       Q.   He goes on to say, "In view of the fact that
20   we continued to discover deficiencies in the
21   construction work, it might be best for you to contact
22   your insurance company and inform them about the
23   unfolding catastrophic condition."    And in your mind,
24   was the brick lug a safe condition?
25       A.   Not at all.   I mean, there was a reason they

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              246

1    designed it to be 36 inches deep in that part of that
2    grade beam.
3        Q.     You talked this morning about the building
4    being out of plumb.    Do you recall that?
5        A.     Yes, sir.
6        Q.     Do you recall what efforts were undertaken to
7    make that determination and who made them, other than
8    just the visual observations you referenced this
9    morning?
10       A.     Well, there was more than one thing.   The
11   building was so far racked that you could see --
12   either a CMU wall was out of plumb or the building was
13   racked.    And when SBS -- or when United Erectors and
14   Speedway came out there, they determined that the
15   building was racked a little over 2 inches.
16       Q.     Do you recall Mr. Clark asking you questions
17   about the hangar doors before lunch?
18       A.     Yes, sir.
19       Q.     And do you recall him indicating -- or
20   acknowledging, at least -- that those -- that the
21   building was field modified to accommodate the
22   foundation?
23       A.     Yes.   It was shipped with 80-foot doors and
24   field modified.
25       Q.     And just to put it in very basic terms, does

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               247

1    that mean that the building that SBS delivered was
2    bigger than the foundation upon which it was supposed
3    to sit?
4        A.     Yes, sir.
5        Q.     Did anyone from SBS tell you that they were
6    field modifying the door section to fit the
7    foundation?
8        A.     No.
9        Q.     When did you find that out?
10       A.     After we asked for an actual measurement.
11   And they said, "Well, the doors open up to 76 foot,
12   2 inches."    And I said, "What happened to the
13   80 feet?"    And that's when -- and it wasn't until
14   afterwards that we determined -- or we found out that
15   field modification had been done when Schulte -- after
16   we contacted Schulte, Schulte said, yes, we shipped
17   80-foot door sections out there.     They had the right
18   steel.    They cut the steel down to fit the foundation.
19       Q.     Did you ever actually go on the roof of the
20   building?
21       A.     No.
22       Q.     Were you able to observe pictures that were
23   taken of the roof?
24       A.     Yes, sir.
25       Q.     Were the conditions of the roof consistent

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                             248

1    with the quality of construction you would expect on a
2    project like this?
3        A.   No.
4        Q.   Were they acceptable to you, as the owner's
5    representative?
6        A.   No, they were not.
7        Q.   I want to put some context here.    There were
8    questions raised this morning about why you didn't
9    bring them back out to address some of these issues.
10   Did you feel like SBS was honest with you about the
11   issues with the schedule for the delivery of the metal
12   building?
13       A.   No.    That changed, I want to say, three or
14   four times.    And then the last time that they said
15   that it was going to be delivered and we got word from
16   Schulte that it hadn't even been put into production
17   yet, that we felt that SBS was not telling us the
18   truth.
19       Q.   Did you feel deceived by SBS in relation to
20   the brick lug issues?
21       A.   Oh, yes.
22       Q.   Go ahead.
23       A.   No.    I just -- that was a potential
24   catastrophic failure they could have had there.
25       Q.   Did you feel deceived by SBS in conjunction

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  249

1    with the field modifications of the hangar doors?
2 A. I did.
3           Q.   Did you feel deceived by SBS in the context
4    of the quality of the construction on the roof that
5    you couldn't see from the ground?
6           A.   Oh, yes.
7           Q.   In light of these issues, what was your level
8    of trust and confidence with SBS at the time you began
9    to discover these defects and you got that letter from
10   Mr. Schiffman we looked at this morning saying, I want
11   to come meet with you and fix this thing?
12          A.   We felt we had exhausted every option with
13   SBS.
14          Q.   Did you have any interest in getting them
15   back out there, given the lack of trust and
16   confidence?
17          A.   No.
18          Q.   All right.     I want to -- I'm going to be
19   jumping around a little bit.        I want to address some
20   of the other questions and issues that were raised
21   this morning.     The -- the bid -- the initial bid, at
22   least; what was the SBS subcontract amount again, if
23   you could remind me?
24          A.   SBS --
25          Q.   I'm sorry.     The Robinson subcontract amount.

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               250

1 A. It was 120 and change.
2        Q.     And the -- the bid, if I recall correctly,
3    initially was 60?
4        A.     The --
5        Q.     60,000?
6        A.     The change order?
7        Q.     Yes.
8        A.     Yes, sir.
9        Q.     You said a quarter of the contract amount.
10   Would you agree with me that that amount --
11 A. It was more like a third.
12       Q.     -- is closer to half?
13       A.     Yeah.    Closer to half.   Yeah.
14       Q.     Did it seem like there was a 50 percent
15   increase in the scope, based on the changes that you
16   knew existed in the plans?
17       A.     Not at all.    That's why I questioned it.    In
18   fact, Tony Weigand questioned it as well.       That's when
19   we determined that we've got to get additional pricing
20   on this.
21       Q.     I believe Mr. Clark referenced the final
22   contract cost being roughly 2 million.        Do you recall
23   that earlier?
24       A.     Yes.
25       Q.     But you don't know what happened between the

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  251

1    time you left and when the project got finished?
2        A.   No.
3        Q.   What I want to focus on is Exhibit 22-A of
4    Robertson where it talks about the C&S contract value.
5    If the project went from 1.2 million to 2 million,
6    does that suggest to you the scope of work may have
7    increased?
8        A.   Oh, without a doubt.
9        Q.   And are you confident that what is being
10   referenced here is a different scope of work than what
11   you solicited from them in Tri-Bar Exhibit --
12       A.   Absolutely.     It had to have been.
13       Q.   They were suggesting that you weren't on the
14   job in December of 2012 this morning.        Do you recall
15   that?
16       A.   Yes, sir.
17       Q.   If I can direct your attention to Tri-Bar
18   Exhibit Number 69.    Mr. Clark showed you a number of
19   daily reports from December this morning.       Those are
20   the ones that he marked.     Did you understand that's
21   the case?
22       A.   Yes.
23       Q.   You may have mentioned, in fact, I think that
24   it didn't look like all of them were there.
25       A.   Correct.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               252

1        Q.   If we look at the December 10th report, which
2    is -- it's in the white book, 69.      Are you with me?
3        A.   Yes, sir.
4        Q.   Do you see on December 10th that SBS's daily
5    report under Inspections, Testing, and Visitors shows
6    Tom Pittman was there to do a site visit?
7        A.   Yes, sir.
8        Q.   So, even if you set aside everything you told
9    us this morning about you being out there sometimes
10   when SBS people weren't, this document at least
11   suggests you were there at least one time in December;
12   right?
13       A.   Correct.
14       Q.   All right.     I want to talk now about the
15   payment issues.   If you can direct your attention to
16   Tri-Bar Exhibit Number 1.     That's their first pay
17   application, isn't it?
18       A.   Yes.
19       Q.   And what is the amount of that pay
20   application?
21       A.   $88,290.50.
22       Q.   What is it after retainage?
23       A.   $79,461.45.
24       Q.   And the date?
25       A.   July 29th of '12.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               253

1        Q.   It looks like maybe 27.     I know you're
2    farther away than --
3 A. 27th.   Sorry.
4        Q.   Okay.   And if we go to Exhibit Number 2 of
5    Tri-Bar, the date?
6 A. 9/7/12.
7        Q.   The amount after retainage?
8        A.   $108,505.64.
9        Q.   Let's go to Number 3, which for some reason
10   is missing the first page.     But if we look down at --
11   come back up to completed this period.      We use that
12   column to come up with our amount.     Oh, first of all,
13   we don't have the date exactly, but it's somewhere
14   after September 30th; correct?
15       A.   Yes, sir.
16       Q.   Scroll down; what's the amount?
17       A.   Yes.    $31,429.01.
18       Q.   Okay.   And after retainage -- let's come back
19   down because there's another document that will help
20   us get to the bottom of that.    Exhibit Number 4, this
21   is pay app number 4; correct?
22       A.   Yes, sir.
23       Q.   And it's dated 10/30/12?
24       A.   Yes, sir.
25       Q.   How much is it for after retainage?

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                    254

1        A.     $3,541.68.
2        Q.     Number 5, date?
3        A.     December 3rd, 2012 -- or is that an 8?
4        Q.     It's a 3, it looks like.
5        A.     Okay.
6        Q.     And the amount?
7        A.     $271,597.01.
8        Q.     Looks like 03 maybe.      Okay.     Let's look at
9    SBS Number 7.      This looks to be a draw summary
10   prepared by SBS, and it shows 79,461 which was paid on
11   September 6th.      Do you see that?
12       A.     Yes.
13       Q.     It shows the 108,505 was paid on 10/22;
14   correct?
15       A.     Correct.
16       Q.     And then for the amount for Number 3 -- there
17   is where I was talking about getting some help -- it's
18   $28,286.11; correct?
19       A.     Correct.
20       Q.     And that would have been sometime -- I don't
21   see the date it was submitted, but it must have been
22   sometime after 9/30.       We saw that it was the September
23   draw; right?
24       A.     Right.
25       Q.     Okay.    So, those all three, if we scroll back

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                  255

1    down, should have been paid on 1/17.        How many -- if
2    you did 30 days from July 27th, where would you fall?
3        A.   August 27th.
4        Q.   Paid on 9/6.    It was late; right?
5        A.   Right.
6        Q.   How many days late?
7        A.   Seven.
8        Q.   If we go to 9/7, that would have been due
9    when?
10 A. 10/7.
11       Q.   It was paid when?
12 A. 10/22.
13       Q.   How many days late?
14 A. 18.
15       Q.   All right.    So, there was reference made --
16   15; right -- 7 minus 22?
17       A.   Yeah.
18       Q.   There was reference made this morning about
19   payment being withheld for three months.       Do you
20   recall that?
21       A.   Yes, sir.
22       Q.   That must have been a reference to these.
23   Would you agree?
24       A.   Yes.
25       Q.   $28,786.00.    As a percentage of the work, how

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               256

1    much is that?
2        A.   Not even 4 percent.
3        Q.   I did the math.    It's 2.5.
4        A.   Okay.
5        Q.   And 3,541, doing the math, it's 0.3 percent.
6    Is that satisfactory progress on this job?
7        A.   No.    In fact, I'm surprised that you would
8    submit a pay application for $3,000.00 or even for
9    $28,000.00, for that matter.
10       Q.   And if we look at -- and I'm going to ask you
11   to use your book this time.    Tab 4 in Tri-Bar's
12   exhibits; that's going to be that pay application.
13 A. I'm sorry, but which tab?
14       Q.   Tab 4.
15 A. 4?
16       Q.   Yeah.
17       A.   Okay.
18       Q.   Okay.    So, let's look at what they're
19   actually billing for in this pay application.       I want
20   you to go to the schedule of values.        There's $1300.00
21   for project management.    Did it seem like they were
22   managing a lot of work that month?
23       A.   No.
24       Q.   $357.00 for rental, $188.00 for builder's
25   risk, and $1800.00 for plumbing.     So, of that, which

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              257

1    is actual work?
2        A.   $1800.00 in plumbing.
3        Q.   So, in an entire month, did they get anything
4    done besides $1800.00 worth of plumbing?
5        A.   Not according to this pay application.
6        Q.   And in the preceding month, what got done?
7    Let's look at tab 3.     Again, we've got project
8    management, we've got other general conditions cost,
9    we got travel, we got builder's risk, we got $9800.00
10   for site utilities, and $16,000.00 for concrete.    Do
11   you see that?
12       A.   Yes.
13       Q.   Was that satisfactory progress for an entire
14   month?
15       A.   No.
16       Q.   So, in a two-month period they have made
17   progress on less than 3 percent of the work.    Is that
18   satisfactory?
19       A.   No, it's not.
20       Q.   And with respect to these amounts which
21   weren't paid until January 17th, this one would have
22   been due when?    Let's assume it was October 1st that
23   it was turned in.    Give them the benefit of the doubt.
24       A.   November 1st.
25       Q.   All right.     So, it was two and a half months

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 258

1    late; right?
2           A.   Right.
3           Q.   $28,000.00 of the -- how big was the total
4    contract?
5 A. It was --
6           Q.   It says on that pay application; right?
7           A.   -- 1.2 -- 1,226,000.
8           Q.   Okay.    Roughly 2 percent of the contract
9    amount; right?
10          A.   Right.
11          Q.   And then this one would have been due --
12   submitted --
13          A.   December -- January 1st.
14          Q.   It was a month and a half late, wasn't it?
15          A.   Well, no.     That's only --
16          Q.   It was --
17          A.   Oh, yeah.     It was a month and a half late.
18          Q.   The big one, the 271; it was submitted when?
19          A.   December 8th.
20          Q.   That's a 3.
21          A.   Okay.    3.
22          Q.   That's my bad handwriting.     So, when was it
23   due?
24          A.   November 3rd -- or January 3rd.
25          Q.   Paid January 17th?

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                259

1        A.   Yes, sir.
2        Q.   It was late two weeks, but not the three
3    months that was suggested this morning, was it?
4        A.   Right.    Correct.
5        Q.   This morning you were talking about the
6    mockup and you were waiting on the mockup.      Who does
7    the mockup?
8        A.   Well, the general contractor does the mockup.
9        Q.   And were they waiting on you or were you
10   waiting on them?
11       A.   We were waiting on them.
12       Q.   Getting back to the brick lug, there were
13   representations made that it was poured exactly the
14   way it was drawn.    Is that true based on what we went
15   through here?
16 A. I'm sorry.     Repeat that question.
17       Q.   I changed gears on you and I apologize for
18   doing so without telling you I was going to.     Going
19   back to the brick lug, there were representations made
20   in prior examination that it was poured exactly the
21   way it was drawn.    Is that true, based on what you
22   observed in the field?
23       A.   No, sir.
24       Q.   With respect to the conditions depicted on
25   the roof that you saw in the paragraphs, what did

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 260

1    those conditions look like?
2           A.   Well, towards the --
3                    MR. CLARK:   Your Honor, I'm going to
4    object.     He said he hadn't been up on the roof, so
5    unless there's a picture sitting there which we can
6    all see, I think it's going to be hearsay what
7    somebody else told him was up on the roof.
8                    THE COURT:   He's the general contractor.
9    I presume he reviewed the pictures of whatever to make
10   a personal statement of what the roof looked like to
11   him.    Can you?
12                   THE WITNESS:   Yes, sir.
13                   THE COURT:   Well, do it then.
14          A.   Well, there was several splices along the
15   cupola area, the roof -- where -- there was three
16   different roof clips used, through discovery.       There
17   was specifically only supposed to be one.        I mean, you
18   can't arbitrarily use different thickness roof clips
19   on a roof and expect it to be correct.       Towards the
20   end of the area where the doors were, where they
21   spliced on sections of rafters and columns, you can
22   literally see in the pictures where the -- the rafter
23   does this.    And I'm exaggerating, but it flows down
24   like this.    You can see it from the ground.     You can
25   look up and see that the roof line is altered.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               261

1        Q.    (BY MR. SLATES)   Is that in the location
2    where you understand them to have field modified the
3    hangar doors?
4        A.    Yes, sir.
5        Q.    Can you associate anything -- any correlation
6    between those two events?
7        A.    Well, they tried to field modify it.     And
8    because of the field modification, it didn't match the
9    original slope.   You can look at the pictures.    And
10   it's -- you've got a straight roof cutting across, and
11   then when you hit that roof line, it dips off.     It's
12   just -- it's like this.
13       Q.    Any other conditions that stand out in your
14   mind from the photographs you reviewed?
15       A.    Well, the grade beams.   There was -- there
16   were bolts that were missing, there was bolts that
17   were not torqued properly, there was really pathetic
18   welds.   The list is lengthy; ad infinitum.    There's --
19   it's a very detailed list.
20       Q.    Well, we'll get into that in more detail with
21   Mr. Boddie.   But let me ask you this.     Knowing what
22   you know now, would you have made the representations
23   about making payments to SBS in light of the fact that
24   you viewed it as a termination for cause?
25       A.    No, I would not have.

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              262

1        Q.   Did you think that -- do you think it's
2    unreasonable for an owner to withhold payment until
3    they quantify the scope of the defects on a project?
4        A.   Not at all.
5        Q.   Do you think an owner should have to pay for
6    defective work?
7        A.   No.
8        Q.   Do you think that it's reasonable for Tri-Bar
9    to offset the cost of repairing the defective work
10   against the amounts that are owed under the contract?
11       A.   Yes.
12                   MR. SLATES:   That's all my questions.
13                   THE COURT:    Mr. Brown, as to matters
14   brought up on cross?
15                   MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.
16                        REDIRECT EXAMINATION
17   BY MR. BROWN:
18       Q.   Mr. Pittman, when you were speaking with Mr.
19   Slates, you indicated that -- as you did this morning,
20   that you took and made additional inquiries for
21   subcontractors; correct?
22       A.   Correct.
23       Q.   I know that at least for electrical, you only
24   have one proposal?
25       A.   Correct.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              263

1           Q.   That's the only one you made?
2           A.   The only one I made.
3           Q.   Thank you.     Now, with regard to the
4    timelines, you would agree with me that you don't have
5    the need or a problem until the problem exists; right?
6 A. I'm not sure I follow you.
7           Q.   There's not a problem until the problem
8    exists.
9           A.   Okay.
10          Q.   Correct?
11 A. I think I follow you.
12          Q.   Okay.   So, as it relates to Mr. Robertson or
13   Robertson Electric, prior to the point where he is
14   submitting bids or he makes this inquiry regarding the
15   additional work that was identified in the plans that
16   he had, you're already soliciting subcontractors for
17   him?
18          A.   Because he never managed -- he never managed
19   the job with enough people.
20          Q.   Now, the reality is, he doesn't get to the
21   site and is not going to work until the December.     Did
22   you know that?
23          A.   Why is that?
24          Q.   Because -- well, the first question is, did
25   you know that?

                             TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                            PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 264

1        A.     Well, I'd have to go back and look at the
2    daily reports, but --
3        Q.     So, when you're seeking to replace him,
4    you're doing it because you just don't want him on the
5    site.    You're just trying to take over the job?
6        A.     No.   That's not true.
7        Q.     Okay.
8        A.     He's not managing -- he's not manning the
9    project.
10       Q.     The reality here is that if your people are
11   blocking and not doing the work that allows them to go
12   forward and do the work, then they've got to man it in
13   such a way that they can get things done in relation
14   to what is there; correct?
15 A. I think that's probably safe.
16       Q.     Okay.    And the next part is also true; that
17   if you're not paying them, then they're not going to
18   send, perhaps, as much as they can if you're not
19   paying them; right?
20       A.     Right.
21       Q.     So, it appears to me what you're really
22   saying is, we want you to work; we're not going to pay
23   you, but we want you to get it done.          Right?
24       A.     No, no.   That's not the case.       I mean --
25       Q.     Well, the testimony -- and it's at this point

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               265

1    uncontroverted that there's an e-mail from Rod Lewis
2    that says October, early November, don't pay these
3    people.   And that is, in fact, what's going on.
4    They're not getting paid; right?
5        A.    No.   We just proved that they did get paid.
6        Q.    No.   What you proved was that there are
7    payments that had been made.    You did not prove that
8    they got paid.
9        A.    Well, I disagree.   We just proved that they
10   got paid.
11       Q.    Now, on the 26th of November is when there is
12   this -- and that's in Exhibit 32.     And that's when Mr.
13   John Grable is saying that you're already pricing the
14   completion of the hangar with other qualified subs and
15   suppliers.   Now, that's -- you're doing that on
16   November 26th.
17       A.    Yes, sir.
18       Q.    Okay.   So, you would agree -- and again, as
19   it relates to Robertson Electric, that if he's not
20   there, then you're attempting to price him and replace
21   him when he's not even there yet.     Right?
22       A.    Well, it goes back to the -- the original
23   problem that we had, is we had a change order.     They
24   gave us a price for the change order that was almost
25   half of their total contract amount for a section of

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               266

1    work that we felt wasn't half again as much work.
2        Q.    Well --
3        A.    And we proved that.
4        Q.    -- I understand that -- well, no.     What you
5    said is -- you said some things.      I don't know that
6    you've proven it.    That would be for the judge to
7    decide.   But the reality here is that, as it relates
8    to what you're talking about, what you're saying is
9    that we identified a problem before it was a problem,
10   and so we're going to replace the problem before it
11   materializes --
12       A.    We didn't identify the problem before it was
13   a problem.    The problem identified itself.   And it
14   tracked -- if you can look through the daily reports,
15   those numbers don't lie.     Assuming they did lie --
16       Q.    Have you ever heard -- at least, you know,
17   Texas Rangers when they talk about one ride, one
18   ranger?
19       A.    Yeah.
20       Q.    Okay.   Well, here the need only realized for
21   one person.
22       A.    Okay.
23       Q.    And you don't get to sit up here and tell
24   someone else how to do their job; right?
25       A.    They didn't do their job.     If they had done

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                267

1    their job, we wouldn't be sitting here.
2        Q.     Well, that presumes that what you're saying
3    is true; correct?
4        A.     Are you -- are you implying I'm lying?
5        Q.     I'll let the facts decide that.    What I'm
6    saying is, the -- it presumes that what you're saying
7    is true.
8        A.     Uh-huh.
9        Q.     Now, as relates to the decisions to
10   terminate, you have decisions to terminate that you're
11   making on November 3rd, November 2nd, November the
12   26th, November 4th, the latter part of October.     These
13   are all times when you're deciding you're going to
14   terminate the entire --
15 A. If they had just showed up to work, we
16   wouldn't have even talked about terminating.
17       Q.     Okay.   I thank you for volunteering.   But the
18   bottom line is, you're saying that these individuals
19   don't show up to work.      And from what I can tell, as
20   you went through with your attorney, that your time of
21   going to the site is sporadic at best; correct?
22       A.     Well, I don't -- I wouldn't say sporadic.
23       Q.     Well --
24       A.     We've already -- we'd already determined that
25   there's -- they said that I was only there -- I didn't

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                268

1    show up in December when their reports clearly say
2    that I was there in December.      And I maintain that I
3    was there several times when there was nobody working.
4    There was nobody from Robertson Electric, there was
5    nobody from SBS there.
6        Q.    And again -- and the issue is if you're
7    believed -- if someone believes you; right?
8        A.    Yeah.
9        Q.    Okay.   Now, you made it a point when you were
10   speaking with Mr. Slates to indicate how concerned you
11   were; correct?
12       A.    Correct.
13       Q.    You were so concerned you don't document it;
14   right?   Right?
15       A.    Correct.
16       Q.    You have this adverse working relationship
17   with SBS at this point; right?
18       A.    No.   It wasn't adverse until the very end.
19       Q.    In your --
20       A.    Even at the time of termination, I said, "I
21   want to try to get you guys paid."
22       Q.    Sir, in your e-mails, you're using profanity
23   that talk about them.
24       A.    Well, I mean, that kind of -- in the
25   construction industry, every once in awhile somebody

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 269

1    drops an F-bomb.
2        Q.   You're talking that you're going to screw
3    over them.
4 A. I didn't say I was going to screw over them.
5    I said I was going to crush them.
6        Q.   Okay.
7        A.   And as a college football player, that's a
8    euphemism.   Okay.    That's -- you know, Rod Lewis is my
9    running back.    He's behind me.     You're a linebacker.
10   These guys are a linebacker that -- I'm going to hit
11   them as hard as I can.      I'm going to pull Rod Lewis to
12   the finish line.     That's my job is to protect the
13   owner.
14       Q.   Now, when you're talking about the euphemism
15   of football and you're going to crush somebody, it was
16   usually quite literal; right?
17 A. In football it was.
18       Q.   Yeah.    I was a halfback.     I know it was.
19       A.   Yeah.
20       Q.   So, the bottom line is, what we're talking
21   about here is, the relationship between the two of you
22   had deteriorated.
23       A.   Towards the end, yes, it had.
24       Q.   And had deteriorated to such an extent that
25   you didn't document it?

                           TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                          PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                              270

1        A.   Well, you know, there was documentation, but
2    I didn't personally document anything about Robertson
3    Electric.
4        Q.   When we talk about, again, 14.2.2 where we're
5    addressing the need for certification, you go to
6    14.2.3 and 14.2.4 and you address what else needed to
7    be done, but you totally miss and omit the fact that
8    you never complied with 14.2.2, which you already
9    admitted you didn't do.       Right?
10 A. I didn't send out notice.
11       Q.   Not just you, but Mr. Grable; correct?
12       A.   Correct.
13       Q.   So, what you're really saying is, Your Honor,
14   don't hold us accountable to the contract, but hold
15   them accountable.      Right?   Right?
16       A.   No.    No.    But --
17       Q.   Then you want to be held accountable to the
18   contract?
19       A.   Well, as we stated before, we had talked
20   about all these issues.       There wasn't any reference to
21   any written notice not being done until just I showed
22   up to here.    The first time I heard that.
23       Q.   Now, you've not been party to at least coming
24   to court often; correct?
25       A.   No.

                            TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                           PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 271

1        Q.   This is the first time I think I've seen you
2    in court; right?
3 A. I've been in court before.
4        Q.   Here?
5        A.   Here.
6        Q.   Okay.   And the record will reflect that in
7    numerous instances, the issue has been noticed on the
8    part of Tri-Bar to put people on notice as to whatever
9    misconduct or failures there have been.       So, you're
10   saying that today is the first instance they made you
11   aware of it; correct?
12       A.   No.   I -- aware of what?
13       Q.   The fact that notice was an issue.
14       A.   Yes, sir.
15       Q.   So, I guess the issue here is whether and to
16   what extent you've been communicating with the
17   attorneys for Tri-Bar.      Thank you.    I have no further
18   questions.
19                  THE COURT:    Mr. Clark?
20                  MR. CLARK:    Oh, I didn't realize I got to
21   go again.
22                  THE COURT:    You don't have to.     Anything
23   that's subject to cross.
24                  MR. CLARK:    Right.   I'm sorry.   I just
25   didn't realize I had another shot at it.

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                               272

1                  THE COURT:    Direct, cross, redirect.      If
2    y'all read the Rules of Civil Procedure, you'd
3    understand basically what I'm doing.
4                  MR. CLARK:    I did.   I just wasn't --
5                  THE COURT:    You have a right to examine
6    on anything Counsel brought up on cross.
7                  MR. CLARK:    Can I take two minutes to
8    visit with my co-counsel?    Because I really didn't
9    realize I had that.   I'm sorry, Your Honor, or I would
10   have been prepared.
11                 THE COURT:    Okay.    Take two minutes.
12                 MR. CLARK:    We don't need a break.   I
13   just want to --
14                 THE COURT:    Two minutes.
15                 (Discussion off the record.)
16                 MR. CLARK:    I have no further questions,
17   Your Honor.
18                 THE COURT:    Okay.    You can step down, Mr.
19   Pittman.
20                 THE WITNESS:    Thank you.
21                 THE COURT:    Yes, sir.   Let me ask y'all,
22   how many witnesses more do you have, Mr. Brown?
23                 MR. BROWN:    We have my client, we have
24   Mr. Kieke, and then myself.
25                 THE COURT:    And yourself.   Okay.   How

                        TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                       PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                   273

1    many do you have, sir?
2                    MR. SLATES:    Well, it depends on what
3    happened with some more of these exhibits.        For sure
4    we will have John Grable -- Mr. Clark may call him
5    adversely -- who is the architect.       Matt Martinez, who
6    works with John Grable.       Dan Boddie.    Steve Mower on
7    the payment of costs associated.       And then it looks
8    like we're probably going to have to call Jennifer
9    Swisher and Bob Carnwath, but those will be brief.
10   That will just be to prove up documents that have been
11   objected to.
12                   THE COURT:    Okay.   So, we're talking
13   about nine more witnesses?
14                   MR. SLATES:    In my case, you're talking
15   about four substantive witnesses and three prove-up
16   witnesses, and then Mr. Clark is going to have some.
17                   THE COURT:    That was three.    That's ten
18   now.    Okay.   You gave me a three day --
19                   MR. SLATES:    Oh, did you say you were --
20                   MR. CLARK:    He didn't ask me yet.
21                   THE COURT:    Okay.   How many do you have?
22                   MR. CLARK:    Dave Morgan, who will not be
23   long.   Kyle Kieke, who will be longer.       Erick Key with
24   Schulte.   And Steve Schiffman and myself and John
25   Maywald.

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                                 274

1                   MR. SLATES:   Would it -- and I'm just
2    throwing this out as a suggestion.       Would it be
3    helpful to do attorney's fees on submission?       It would
4    save us --
5                   THE COURT:    Y'all have three days.    You
6    said three days and I'm not seeing three days.
7                   MR. SLATES:   I'm worried about that, too,
8    Your Honor, frankly, given how long today has taken.
9                   THE COURT:    Yeah.   Since you have one
10   witness for one day.
11                  MR. SLATES:   No.     I -- I will say that I
12   think Tom will be the longest witness of the trial.
13                  THE COURT:    Well, you have to focus
14   because I've got three days, and then you have a
15   mistrial and we do it again.       So, focus.   We'll see
16   how it goes tomorrow.    Okay.     We might be working late
17   tomorrow.    So, have all your witnesses ready to go.
18   See y'all in the morning at 9:00.
19                  MR. BROWN:    Yes, sir.
20                  THE COURT:    Thank y'all.
21
22
23
24
25

                         TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                        PHONE: (830) 331-8286
                                                            275

1    THE STATE OF TEXAS    *
2    COUNTY OF KENDALL     *
3                 I, TAMI L. WOLFF, Certified Shorthand
4    Reporter in and for the State of Texas, do hereby
5    certify that the above and foregoing contains a true
6    and correct transcription of all portions of evidence
7    and other proceedings requested in writing or orally
8    by counsel for the parties to be included in this
9    volume of the reporter's record, in the above-styled
10   and numbered cause, all of which occurred in open
11   court or in chambers and were reported by me.
12                I further certify that this reporter's
13   record of the proceedings truly and correctly reflects
14   the exhibits, if any, admitted by the respective
15   parties.
16                I further certify that the total cost of
17   the preparation of this reporter's record is $________
18   and was paid/will be paid by ________________________.
19                WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND on this, the
20              day of                       , 2015.
21
22                               ______/s/___________________
                                 TAMI L. WOLFF
23                               Texas CSR 5833
                                 Expiration: 12/31/15
24                               Kendall County Courthouse
                                 201 E. San Antonio, Suite 212
25                               Boerne, Texas 78006
                                 (830) 331-8286

                          TAMI L. WOLFF, C.S.R.
                         PHONE: (830) 331-8286