Court Opinion

ID: 9598550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:09:51.687266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:42.158695
License: Public Domain

ROSE, Justice,
specially concurring.
I join the court with the following reservations, which are personal to my position and not a part of the Per Curiam opinion:
It has been said that once a dissenting justice has had his day,
“. . . [h]e should . . . live with the law as it has been stated . abiding the time when he may win over the majority, but he should regard dearly enough the stability of the law that governs all the courts in the state not to renew the rataplan of his dissent. . . ” Traynor (14 U.Chi.L.Rev. 219).
It is within the boundaries of this thought that I join the Per Curiam. While recognizing the opinion to represent the present state of the law in Wyoming, I retire at this time from an exhaustive dissent to rest for the battle to be waged at another and more propitious time. See my dissent in Worthington v. State, Wyo., 598 P.2d 796 (1979), at page 809; my concurring opinion in Oroz v. Board of County Commissioners, Wyo., 575 P.2d 1155, 1161 (1978); and my views expressed in Jivelekas v. City of Worland, Wyo., 546 P.2d 419 (1976).