Court Opinion

ID: 1273879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:19:02.176984+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:42.256506
License: Public Domain

212 Ga. 45 (1955)
90 S.E.2d 405
HADDEN
v.
PIERCE et al.
19123.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Submitted October 10, 1955.
Decided November 14, 1955.
W. W. Larsen, Jr., Harold E. Ward, for plaintiff in error.
Wm. Malcolm Towson, contra.
DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.
Any citizen has such interest in having public officers perform their duties as will authorize him to maintain mandamus proceedings for that purpose. Code § 64-101. In such action, although the official duty required is that of issuing a building permit, it is not a private right of the petitioner requiring a showing of irreparable injury as required by Code § 64-105. A filling station is not a nuisance per se; and it appearing from all the evidence in this record that the only evidence offered in opposition to the application for the permit was of property owners nearby upon grounds of danger, noise and the depressing of the value of their property, none of which amount to a valid reason for declining the permit, it was therefore an abuse of discretion to refuse the mandamus. City of Pearson v. Glidden Co., 205 Ga. 738 (55 S.E.2d 125); City of Hawkinsville v. Williams, 185 Ga. 396 (195 S.E. 162); Wofford Oil Co. v. City of Calhoun, 183 Ga. 511 (189 S.E. 5); Brown v. City of Thomasville, 156 Ga. 260 (118 S.E. 854).
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.