Court Opinion

ID: 1793628
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:27:38.641798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:52.061964
License: Public Domain

267 S.W.3d 821 (2008)
Ruth ATKINS, Appellant,
v.
TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent.
No. ED 91274.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
October 28, 2008.
James E. Heckel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Kareitha A. Osborne, Attorney Generals Office of State Courts Administrator, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Atkins (hereinafter, "Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (hereinafter, "the Commission") awarding her permanent partial disability benefits. Claimant raises two points on appeal challenging the Commission's decision to deny Claimant's request for permanent total disability benefits arguing the Commission's decision lacked support based on the competent and substantial evidence presented.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record and no error of law appears. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission's decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).