Court Opinion

ID: 8459965
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 06:02:47.16458+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:07.875600
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chesnut appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chesnut, No. 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 80, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.