Court Opinion

ID: 7975195
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 00:59:02.665542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:53.254779
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Respondent commenced this action to recover on a promissory note of $1,700 executed by appellants. The trial court instructed the jury to return a verdict *527for respondent, less the sum of $1,000, which had been paid. The court granted a new trial, apparently for the reason, as appears from the memorandum attached to the order, that a new trial had been granted in the accompanying case of this respondent against appellant C. B. Burt, supra, page 323; and to await the result of that action.
It would seem that such action was satisfactory to the parties, and the order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.