Court Opinion

ID: 678984
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:29:53+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:18:02.813287
License: Public Domain

36 F.3d 1092
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Michael JONES, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Sewall SMITH;  Richard A. Lanham;  Joseph Wilson, AssistantWarden;  P. Nesbit, Correctional Officer,Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6462.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted August 25, 1994.Decided October 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  M.J. Garbis, District Judge.  (CA-93-2085-MJG).
Michael Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Jones v. Smith, No. CA-93-2085-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED