Court Opinion

ID: 7567079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:07:39.887613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:17.756212
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We affirm in part and reverse in part. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in removing from the jury’s consideration the issue pertaining to the injured claimant’s use of a seat belt. The record reflects competent evidence of the existence of a functioning seat belt and conflicting evidence of its use at the time of the accident in question. Notwithstanding our holding on the seat belt issue we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in granting a new trial and affirm that order.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.