Court Opinion

ID: 1020551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:52:58.693957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:54.883329
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-1161

MANUEL HELMBRIGHT,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

BONNIE DAVIS, in her private and official
capacity; CHIEF K. GESSLER, in his official
capacity; OFFICER WALLACE, in his official
capacity; UNKNOWN DESK OFFICER, in his
official capacity,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

                            No. 06-1595

MANUEL HELMBRIGHT,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

     versus

BONNIE DAVIS, in her private and official
capacity; CHIEF K. GESSLER, in his official
capacity; OFFICER WALLACE, in his official
capacity; UNKNOWN DESK OFFICER, in his
official capacity,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (5:04-cv-00069-FPS)

Submitted: September 26, 2006            Decided: September 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Helmbright, Appellant Pro Se. Paul C. Camilletti, CAMILETTI,
SACCO & PIZZUTI, Wheeling, West Virginia; Melanie Morgan Norris,
Jacob Andrew Manning, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

                                - 2 -
PER CURIAM:

          Manuel Helmbright appeals the district court’s orders

granting defendant police officers’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and vacating its pre-trial conference and trial

schedule in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Helmbright v. Davis,

No. 5:04-cv-00069-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 20, 2006; Mar. 23, 2006. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                              - 3 -