Court Opinion

ID: 3661233
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:12:43.05337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:34.332366
License: Public Domain

SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Motion by State to dismiss appeal of defendant.
The defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with the crime of rape of a female person under the age of twelve years. There was a verdict of guilty, and judgment of death by asphyxiation. Defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was permitted to appeal in formapauperis. The court below ordered the county of Wake to pay the necessary costs of obtaining transcript of the proceedings and of preparing the requisite copies of the record and briefs on such appeal. The record and case on appeal were duly docketed in this Court, but defendant has filed no brief, which works an abandonment of the assignments of error (S. v.Hooker, 207 N.C. 648, 178 S.E. 75; S. v. Dingle, 209 N.C. 293,183 S.E. 376; S. v. Robinson, 212 N.C. 536, 193 S.E. 701; S. v. Hadley,ante, 427, except those appearing on the face of the record, which are cognizable ex mero motu). S. v. Edney, 202 N.C. 706, 164 S.E. 23.
The Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 28 of this Court as to filing briefs. This motion is allowed. S.v. Kinyon, 210 N.C. 294, 186 S.E. 368; S. v. Robinson, supra; S. v.Hadley, supra.
However, as is customary in capital cases, we have examined the record and case on appeal to see if any error appears. The exceptions *Page 550 
presented are without merit. The record is regular. The case on appeal reveals competent evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict. The charge of the court is not sent up, but the agreed case on appeal discloses that "there are no exceptions to the charge."
We find no error. The judgment is affirmed, and
Appeal dismissed.
SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.