Court Opinion

ID: 9704922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 00:51:52.811819+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:06.493016
License: Public Domain

*578Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Judge MacPhail:
I concur with that part of the opinion of the majority which holds that it was error for the trial court to sustain Mr. Flaherty’s demurrer because there are unresolved issues.
I respectfully dissent to that part of the majority opinion which holds that Mr. Flaherty is entitled to the privilege of immunity as a high public official because I am of the opinion that his duties and authority fall outside of the definition of a high public official as set forth in Balshy v. Rank, 507 Pa. 384, 389-90, 490 A.2d 415, 417 (1985).