Court Opinion

ID: 3108769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:29:12.069129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:20.745496
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-11-0076-CV
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                       
                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       
                                  AT AMARILLO
                                       
                                    PANEL B
                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAY 19, 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  CHERYL R. CROFT AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF
               10418 EASTERN HILL COURT, ROWLETT, TEXAS  75089,
                                       
                                 			Appellant
                                      V.
                                       
               HSBC BANK USA, NA., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED
                HOLDERS OF RENAISSANCE EQUITY LOAN ASSET-BACKED
                         CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-3,
                                       
                                  			Appellee
                         _____________________________
                                       
             FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF DALLAS COUNTY;
                                       
           NO. CC-10-06388-C; HONORABLE SALLY MONTGOMERY, PRESIDING

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memorandum Opinion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Cheryl R. Croft (appellant) filed a notice of appeal on December 8, 2010.  We dismiss the appeal.  The clerks record was filed with this court on March 29, 2011.  No reporter's record was taken.  Appellant's brief was due on April 28, 2011.  No brief was filed by that date, so the Court notified appellant on May 6, 2011, that the due date for the brief had lapsed, that the brief had not been filed, and that if it was not received by May 16, 2011, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.  To date, no brief or motion to extend the deadline has been filed.  Nor has the court received any explanation for the omission.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P.  38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).
Per Curiam