Court Opinion

ID: 44453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:19:07+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:15.342969
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    July 13, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 06-10089
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS HERIBERTO SAUCEDA-CUELLAR,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:05-CR-66-ALL
                       --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Heriberto

Sauceda-Cuellar raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense.    The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

     *

  Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.