Court Opinion

ID: 9533394
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:31:24.619425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:02.530597
License: Public Domain

GARRARD, Judge,
concurring.
It appears to me that the portion of the court’s order in question merely directs the landowners to furnish water samples when demanded to do so by the Board. I read the phrase “and at reasonable frequency” to merely limit the number of demands available to the Board. As such, the order is within the court’s injunctive power and not contrary to the Board’s regulations (since the Board alone will determine whether any demand is made).
On the other hand, since both the Board and the majority read the order to mandate the submission of samples I concur in vacating the order as written.