Court Opinion

ID: 8852030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 17:16:56.058089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:31.947441
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that on the issue whether he held the property in question as owner in his own right, or as a tenant of the receiver, he was entitled to a trial by jury, and we think he was. He was a stranger to the equity case in which the receiver was appointed. He claimed as owner for 17 years under writings that more or less supported his claim; and, as to him, the proceeding to dispossess him of the property was, to all intents and purposes, a suit in ejectment. The decree appealed from is reversed. The cause is remanded, with instructions to dismiss the petition of the receiver, but without prejudice to his right, under the direction of the court, to institute proper proceedings at law to recover the property in controversy.