Court Opinion

ID: 9697386
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:15:22.851856+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:19.876951
License: Public Domain

LARSEN, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent. I would hold that the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose also extend to the future performance of the vehicle because these implied warranties are expressly linked temporally to the express warranty by the following language contained in the express warranty at issue: “ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE APPLICABLE TO THIS CAR IS LIMITED IN DURATION TO THE DURATION OF THIS WRITTEN WARRANTY,” (Reproduced Record at R25). Accordingly, I would reverse the decision of the Superior Court as to Counts One, Two and Three, and remand to the Court of Common Pleas.
PAPADAKOS, J., joins this dissenting opinion.