Court Opinion

ID: 2865781
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:59:27.911095+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:15.280185
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00617-CR

Kim Kaylean Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 47,893, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Kim Kaylean Williams was placed on deferred adjudication community
supervision after pleading guilty to tampering with a governmental record.  See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.
§ 37.10 (West Supp. 2002).  The district court subsequently revoked supervision, adjudicated
appellant guilty, and sentenced her to incarceration for twenty-one months in a state jail.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  Counsel's
motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				__________________________________________
				David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed:   March 14, 2002
Do Not Publish