Court Opinion

ID: 1003534
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:27:55.76638+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:35.551730
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Kayode Raji seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order denying his motion to reopen his immigration proceedings as untimely. Our review of the record discloses that the Board properly dismissed Raji’s motion to reopen as untimely. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
  
   See Raji v. INS,
  
  No. A71-792-971 (B.I.A. July 21, 2000). We deny Raji’s motion to supplement the record with newly discovered evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.