Court Opinion

ID: 4565985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-16 16:01:52.544816+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:02.016824
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                        Filed: August 14, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * *  *
EDWARD MITCHELL,           *                                     UNPUBLISHED
                           *
         Petitioner,       *                                     No. 16-749V
                           *                                     Special Master Gowen
v.                         *
                           *                                     Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
         Respondent.       *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Michael A. Firestone, Marvin Firestone, MD, JD and Associates, San Mateo, CA, for Petitioner.
Lisa A. Watts, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                         DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

        On March 30, 2020, Edward Mitchell (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and
costs. Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (“Fees App.”) (ECF No. 59). For the reasons discussed
below, I GRANT Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and award a total of $72,887.16.

    I.        Procedural History

       On June 24, 2016, Petitioner filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program.2 Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular-pertussis,
measles, mumps, and rubella, the inactivated poliovirus, and the Twinrix (combined hepatitis A
and B) vaccines on July 3, 2013, he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory
demyelinating polyneuropathy. See Petition (ECF No. 1). On September 24, 2019, the parties filed

1
  I intend to post this Ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the Ruling will be
available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services).
2
 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine
Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
a stipulation, which I adopted as my decision awarding compensation on the same day. (ECF No.
52).

        On March 30, 2020, Petitioner filed a motion for final attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner
requests compensation in the total amount of $70,018.06, representing $37,352.97 in attorneys’
fees and $32,665.09 in costs. Fees App. at 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants
he has personally incurred costs of $2,900.00 in pursuit of his claim. Id. Respondent reacted to the
fees motion on April 8, 2020, stating that “Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for
an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.” Response at 2 (ECF No. 59). Petitioner
did not file a reply thereafter.

         The matter is now ripe for adjudication.

   II.      Analysis

       Under the Vaccine Act, the special master may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
for a petition that does not result in an award of compensation but was filed in good faith and
supported by a reasonable basis. § 300aa–15(e)(1). Here, because Petitioner was awarded
compensation pursuant to a stipulation, he is entitled to a reasonable award of final attorneys’ fees
and costs.

         Petitioners “bea[r] the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and
the expenses incurred” are reasonable. Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482,
484 (1993). Adequate proof of the claimed fees and costs should be presented when the motion is
filed. Id. at 484 n. 1. The special master has the discretion to reduce awards sua sponte, independent
of enumerated objections from the respondent. Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed.
Cl. 201, 208–09 (Fed. Cl. 2009); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed.
Cl. 2008), aff'd No. 99–537V, 2008 WL 2066611 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008).

                a. Attorneys’ Fees

        Petitioner requests the following hourly rates for the work of his counsel, Mr. Michael
Firestone: $260.00 per hour for work performed in 2015, $269.62 per hour for work performed in
2016, $279.60 per hour for work performed in 2017, $289.39 per hour for work performed in 2018,
$300.10 per hour for work performed in 2019, and $311.20 per hour for work performed in 2020.
These rates are reasonable and consistent with what Mr. Firestone has previously been awarded
for his Vaccine Program work.

        Turning next to review of the submitted billing statement, I find that the overall hours spent
on this matter appear to be reasonable. The entries are reasonable and accurately describe the work
being performed and the length of time it took to perform each task. Respondent also has not
identified any particular entries as being objectionable. Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to final
attorneys’ fees of $37,352.97.

                b. Attorneys’ Costs

                                                    2
       Like attorneys’ fees, a request for reimbursement of costs must be reasonable. Perreira v.
Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (Fed. Cl. 1992). Petitioner requests total
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $32,665.09. This amount is comprised of acquiring medical
records, postage, travel expenses, and expert fees, including a life care planner, a vocational expert,
an economist, and petitioner’s medical expert Dr. Richard Lewis. Fees App. at 1. Petitioner has
provided adequate documentation supporting these costs and all appear to be reasonable in the
undersigned’s experience.3

       Requiring reduction is the cost of photocopies. Petitioner states that counsel charged $0.50
per page for all photocopies made with the firm’s office copier, and that a total of 103 copies were
made this way. However, the Vaccine Program has consistently awarded $0.20 per page as a
reasonable amount for in-house photocopying. See Haynes v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
No. 17-365V, 2020 WL 2500131, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 21, 2020). Application of a
$0.20/per page rate results in a reduction of $30.90.

             Petitioner is therefore awarded final attorneys’ costs of $32,634.19.

                    c. Petitioner’s Costs

        Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants that he has personally incurred costs
of $2,900.00, comprised of the Court’s filing fee and a retainer for an expert. Fees App. at 63. I
find these costs to be reasonable and they shall be awarded in full.

      III.      Conclusion

       In accordance with the foregoing, Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is
GRANTED. I find that Petitioner is entitled to a reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs as
follows:

    Attorneys’ Fees Requested                                                      $37,352.97
    (Reduction of Fees)                                                                 -
    Total Attorneys’ Fees Awarded                                                  $37,352.97

    Attorneys’ Costs Requested                                                     $32,665.09
    (Reduction of Costs)                                                            - ($30.90)
    Total Attorneys’ Costs Awarded                                                 $32,634.19

    Total Attorneys’ Fees and Costs                                                $69,987.16

    Petitioner’s Costs                                                              $2,900.00

    Total Amount Awarded                                                           $72,887.16
3
  In finding the expert costs reasonable, I am not making a specific ruling that any of the hourly rates billed by these
experts is reasonable in all cases, but rather that they are reasonable for the work performed in the instant case. I
reserve the right to assess the hourly rates of these experts in future cases in light of their work product in those
cases.

                                                           3
         Accordingly, I award the following:

    1) a lump sum in the amount of $69,987.16, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
       attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and his attorney,
       Mr. Michael Firestone4; and

    2) a lump sum in the amount of $2,900.00, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
       costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.5

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      /s/Thomas L. Gowen
                                                      Thomas L. Gowen
                                                      Special Master

4
  This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by
the attorney against a client, “advanced costs,” and fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, Section 15(e)(3)
prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded
herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
5
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine
Rule 11(a).

                                                          4