Court Opinion

ID: 9596674
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:52:06.60017+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:35.588540
License: Public Domain

WOOD, Chief Judge (specially concurring). I concur in the result. I also concur in the opinion with the exception of the last two paragraphs. I do not join in the last two paragraphs because they discuss matters which were not raised as an issue in this case and which are not necessary for a decision of the issues presented. Further, there is no factual basis for the discussion. The vice of the last two paragraphs is not only that they are an advisory opinion; in this case, they are an unsolicited advisory opinion. See Bell Telephone Laboratories v. Bureau of Revenue, 78 N.M. 78, 428 P.2d 617 (1966).