Court Opinion

ID: 9579564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:56:14.115898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:35.364591
License: Public Domain

Miller-Lerman, Judge,
concurring.
I would have thought in a case in which the rules of evidence have been invoked that a greater foundation by the testifying officer would be required before the sworn report could be admitted. Further, I would have thought in a case in which the rules of evidence have been invoked that a document admitted for jurisdictional purposes, but not offered “to prove the truth of the matter assertive [sic] therein” and not admitted for such purposes, would be incapable of establishing a prima facie case, even under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(2) or (3) (Cum. Supp. 1992) and 247 Neb. Admin. Code, ch. 1, § 006.05B (1993). *115However, based on McPherrin v. Conrad, 248 Neb. 561, 537 N.W.2d 498 (1995), I concur.