Court Opinion

ID: 509169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:55:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:28:28.770241
License: Public Domain

852 F.2d 566Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.George Bernard SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.R.R. OVERBY, Correctional Sergeant;  J.K. Tuck, RegisteredNurse, Defendants- Appellees.
No. 88-7596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 31, 1988.Decided:  July 22, 1988.

George Bernard Shaw, appellant pro se.
Stephen Douglas Rosenthal (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
George Bernard Shaw appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Shaw v. Overby, C/A No. 87-782-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 10, 1988).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.