Court Opinion

ID: 666151
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:14:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:51.684157
License: Public Domain

19 F.3d 1430
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Anthony BAKER, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6029.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.Decided March 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.  (CR-90-324-S, CA-93-4022-S)
Anthony Baker, appellant pro se.
Ethan L. Bauman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Baker, Nos.  CR-90-324-S;  CA-93-4022-S (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.

*
 We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel