Court Opinion

ID: 4568830
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-23 15:03:19.687832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:07.764886
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                            IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                            OF FLORIDA

                                            SECOND DISTRICT

ELIZABETH J. WILLIAMS,             )
                                   )
           Appellant,              )
                                   )
v.                                 )                   Case No. 2D20-95
                                   )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
                                   )
           Appellee.               )
___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 23, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Christopher C.
Sabella, Judge.

Elizabeth J. Williams, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

              Elizabeth J. Williams appeals the order denying her motion under Florida

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct her sentence. We affirm without

comment the denial of her motion but remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the

amended judgment.

              A jury found Williams guilty of one count each of second-degree murder

with a weapon (count one) and conspiracy to commit second-degree murder with a
weapon (count two). The court sentenced her to concurrent terms of life imprisonment

on the substantive count and fifteen years' imprisonment on the conspiracy count.

              In her rule 3.800(a) motion, Williams argued that her life sentence for

second-degree murder with a weapon is illegal because the offense was improperly

reclassified from a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment to a life felony

pursuant to section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (2003). In its response to the motion,

the State conceded that Williams's conviction was "reclassified improperly" but

maintained that her life sentence is nonetheless legal. The postconviction court agreed

with the State but directed the clerk of court to amend the judgment and sentence to

reflect that Williams's conviction for second-degree murder with a weapon is a first-

degree felony punishable by life imprisonment.

              The amended judgment and sentence now correctly indicate that

Williams's conviction on count one for second-degree murder with a weapon is a first-

degree felony punishable by life imprisonment. Inexplicably, however, the amended

judgment now incorrectly indicates that Williams's conviction on count two is also for

substantive second-degree murder with a weapon and is a life felony. (The amended

sentence reflects no change.) The original judgment correctly indicated that Williams's

conviction on count two is for conspiracy to commit second-degree murder with a

weapon and is a second-degree felony. As the amended judgment contains a clear

scrivener's error, we affirm but remand for correction of the amended judgment with

respect to count two. See Herrera v. State, 276 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

              Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

                                            -2-