Court Opinion

ID: 4266276
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-23 07:46:59.521074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:55.567421
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-18-00044-CV

                                  COURT OF APPEALS

                      THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                          CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JAMES LOVERDE, M.D.,                                                                     Appellant,

                                                   v.

REGIONAL EMPLOYEE
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 13th District Court
                   of Navarro County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
   Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria
            Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

        Appellant, James LoVerde, M.D., filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the

13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, in cause number D-16-24991-CV. 1

        1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).
Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties

have entered into an agreement resolving the dispute between the parties. Appellant

requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                      /s/ Rogelio Valdez
                                                      ROGELIO VALDEZ
                                                      Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the
19th day of April, 2018.

                                               2