Court Opinion

ID: 2865623
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:57:12.121485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:05.564985
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00096-CV

Tana Oil and Gas Corporation, Appellant

v.

Richard G. Cernosek, CER-MOR-LEB, a General Partnership and

Garth C. Bates, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 96V-138, HONORABLE DANIEL R. BECK, JUDGE PRESIDING 

	On January 20, 2002, the district court granted a motion submitted by Richard G.
Cernosek, CER-MOR-LEB, a general partnership, and Garth C. Bates, appellees, requesting a
modification of the original class certification order signed in this cause which additionally denied
a motion submitted by appellant Tana Oil and Gas Corporation to decertify the class.  Tana filed this
appeal and a motion to stay the district court proceedings pending the resolution of this appeal. 
Appellees subsequently filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.  Appellees contend that
this appeal is an attempted second appeal from the modification of a class certification order that was
previously affirmed by this Court.  See Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. Bates, 978 S.W.2d 735 (Tex.
App.--Austin 1998, no pet.).  Citing Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352 (Tex.
2000), appellees contend that the modification order makes no fundamental change in the class
certification order, and therefore, this is an improper interlocutory appeal.  See id. at 356.  We agree
and therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
	As we have not yet ruled on appellant's motion to stay the district court proceedings
pending the resolution of this appeal and having dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction, we
also dismiss the motion to stay.

  
					Justice Mack Kidd
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed:   April 11, 2002
Do Not Publish