Court Opinion

ID: 990083
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:16:06.024028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:31.756420
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6656

CHARLES GWYN PAFFORD,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD ANGELONE; DANIEL T. MAHON,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-95-1229-R)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Gwyn Pafford, Appellant Pro Se. Wirt Peebles Marks, IV,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as
amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 29 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law Co-op.

Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that

a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certifi-

cate. We dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Pafford v.

Angelone, No. CA-95-1229-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 4, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2