Court Opinion

ID: 5227347
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:47:59.581523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:36.613852
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
Judgment in these two actions was entered on June 36, 1913,' and notice of appeal was served on July 33, 1913. The defendant then obtained 130 days within which to make and serve a case. Ho such case having been served the respondent moved to dismiss the appeal, which by order entered December 37, 1913, was granted, unless appellant procured return to be filed and case printed and served and filed, and the cases on the calendar for argument, one on January 13, and other on January 33,1913. Up to these dates no case was served and appellant now moves for additional time to have the eases on the calendar ready for argument. He bases this application on the fact that one of the official stenographers was in Europe during the summer and that it was, therefore, impossible to obtain the minutes and for that reason appellant could not prepare the case. In answer to the allegation, it appears that the official stenographer was not in Europe, that the appellant could have obtained the stenographer’s minutes at the time, and that no order was given for the minutes to the stenographer until after January 1, 1913. This would appear to be a deliberate attempt to deceive the court. There is not a particle of excuse for the failure of defendant to file, the case within the time allowed by the trial court, there is not a particle of excuse for the failure of defendant to prepare and serve case and papers on appeal within the time allowed by this court. The defendant’s attorney having failed to comply with the rules* requiring him to print and serve case and papers on appeal, to excuse such default, has made an affidavit which is misleading and could only be intended to deceive. Such practice cannot be too strongly condemned and it must result in a denial Of this motion. The motion to extend time is, therefore, denied, with ten dollars costs, and the appeal stands dismissed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Order to be settled on notice.

 See General Rules of Practice, rule 41.— [Rep.