Court Opinion

ID: 8480462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:33:01.587106+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.951083
License: Public Domain

*268Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1, 2010 WL 1790438 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.