Court Opinion

ID: 40090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:39:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:25.887502
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    December 14, 2005

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 04-40786
                         Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO BRISENO,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 1:02-CR-52-1
                        --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo

Briseno has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967).   Briseno has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief and has not filed a response.       Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.