Court Opinion

ID: 9625168
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 07:30:02.686559+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:19.062812
License: Public Domain

SCHAUER, J.
I dissent. It is my view that the opinion prepared for the District Court of Appeal (reported at (Cal. *835App.) 260 P.2d 217), authored by Justice Pox and concurred in by Presiding Justice Moore and Justice McComb, adequately discusses and correctly resolves the issues which are presented on" this appeal. For the reasons therein stated, I would affirm the judgment.
Respondent’s petition for a rehearing was denied June 23, 1954. Schauer, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.