Court Opinion

ID: 3868307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:02:28.360292+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:36.068232
License: Public Domain

In an action on the case against a sheriff for permitting the escape of a party arrested on original writ or mesne process, the measure of damages is the damages actually sustained, and the amount of the judgment recovered in the action in which the escape is permitted is only prima facie evidence, open to rebuttal by counter evidence adduced by the sheriff. Patterson
v. Westervelt, 11 Wend. 543; Brooks v. Hoyt, 6 Pick. 468;Eaton v. Ogier, 2 Me. 46; State Treasurer v. Weeks, 4 Vt. 215;  Danforth v. Pratt, 9 Cush. 318; Arden v. Goodacre,
11 C.B. 371; Shuler v. Garrison, 5 W.  Serg. 455; Smith v.Hart, 1 Brev. 146; Spafford v. Goodell, 3 McLean, 97;Blodgett v. The Town of Brattleboro, 30 Vt. 579; Hootman v.Shriner, 15 Ohio St. 43.
Exceptions sustained.