Court Opinion

ID: 4700912
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-02 18:00:35.666225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:06:14.045388
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-50831      Document: 00515924021         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/02/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                     July 2, 2021
                                  No. 19-50831                     Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                      Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Albert Guerra Mata,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 5:17-CR-391-27

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Albert Guerra Mata has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Mata has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-50831    Document: 00515924021          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/02/2021

                                  No. 19-50831

   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2