Court Opinion

ID: 3653452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:07:22.840007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:09.529476
License: Public Domain

The defendant was charged in the usual form of indictment with retailing without license "a quantity of spirituous liquor by small measure, to wit, by the measure of a pint." The jury returned for a special verdict "that the defendant sold one quart of whiskey to J. B. Constand, in Polk County, about one year prior to the finding of the bill, for which said Constand in Polk County paid the defendant 30 cents. If upon the above facts the court be of the opinion that the defendant is guilty, the jury so find; otherwise, not guilty."
His Honor held that the defendant was not guilty and so adjudged. The solicitor for the State appealed.
We are of the opinion that his Honor could not have adjudged the defendant guilty upon the special verdict, and that he could not render any judgment thereon. The offense charged is selling liquor without having a license to do so. It is true that it has been the settled law in this State for more than fifty years that "proof of the existence of a license to retail must come from the defendant." S. v. Emery, (1061)  98 N.C. 668; and upon proof of sale, in the absence of such proof, the jury must find the defendant guilty.
If, however, the jury shall, instead of returning a general verdict, find a special verdict, they should find every fact, if it exists, either by proof or presumption, essential to the defendant's guilt; otherwise, the court should set the finding aside and direct a venire de novo. S. v.Bloodworth, 94 N.C. 918; S. v. Bray, 89 N.C. 480; S. v. Corporation,111 N.C. 661; S. v. Oakley, 103 N.C. 408.
The bill of indictment is drawn under the provisions of section 1076 of the Code, which makes it a misdemeanor to sell "spirituous liquor by the small measure in any other manner than is prescribed by law." The charge is that the defendant sold "by the measure of a pint." It may, if the allegations are found to be true, be sustained either under that section or section 103, chapter 9, Laws 1901. Section 70 of this statute, being the revenue law of that year, prescribes: "Every person . . . selling spirituous . . . liquors . . . shall pay a license tax semi-annually on the first days of January and July as follows: First, for selling in quantities of 5 gallons or less, $50 for each six months; second, for selling in quantities of 5 gallons or more, *Page 749 
$100 for each six months," etc. Section 103 makes it a misdemeanor to practice any trade or profession or use any franchise without having paid the tax and obtained a license as required, etc. It would seem that in view of the new classification of dealers in spirituous liquors, a sale of 5 gallons or less would be by small measure. This is the principle of construction adopted in S. v. Shaw, 13 N.C. 198. We have said this much because we presume the appeal is taken for the purpose of having our opinion on the question.
For the defect in the special verdict there must be a
Venire de novo.
Cited: S. v. Holder, 133 N.C. 713; S. v. Fisher, 162 N.C. 565.
(1062)