Court Opinion

ID: 6143581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:47:35.856495+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:45.547300
License: Public Domain

HiltoN, J.
— As a general rule, this court will, upon appeals from inferior courts, disregard all objections not taken at the trial, nor distinctly specified in the notice of appeal; but we do net consider this case one to which this rule should be applied. Here the drafts, or orders sued on, were negotiable; and, it appealing at the trial that they were lost, parol evidence Avas given of their contents. Under such circumstances, the loss being distinctly proved, to entitle the plaintiff to recover, he Avas required to execute a bond to the defendants, in a penalty at least double the amount of the drafts or orders, Avith two sureties, to be approved by the court in Avhich the trial Avas had, conditioned to indemnify, &c., against all claims by any other person on account of such drafts, and against all costs and expenses by reason of such claim. 2 R. S. 406, § 76.
The giving of this bond was a pre-requisite to any recovery against the defendants upon the drafts, and the return not showing affirmatively that any such bond was given, the judgment must therefore be reversed.
Judgment reversed.