Court Opinion

ID: 9398051
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-29 15:07:31.983635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:30.420641
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued May 25, 2023

                                         In The

                                   Court of Appeals
                                        For The

                           First District of Texas
                              ————————————
                                   NO. 01-23-00352-CR
                             ———————————
                     IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

            Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a

petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus

directing the trial court to “[r]emove [c]ounsel that is appointed, because [DeBoest]

is electing to proceed pro se.”1

1
      The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110,
      in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill
      presiding.
      Our review of DeBoest’s mandamus petition reflects that he has failed to

establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7,

52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly,

we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

                                           2