Court Opinion

ID: 9367659
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-01 16:03:11.87551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:02.003440
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                                 FOURTH DISTRICT

                            TINIKO THOMPSON,
                                 Appellant,

                                       v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,
                                Appellee.

                                 No. 4D22-1136

                             [February 1, 2023]

   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 14007484CF10A.

   Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A.,
Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

   Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

     In this appeal of an order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction
relief, appellant raises challenges to the trial court’s denial of six grounds
of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find merit in only one. The trial
court found that ground six of appellant’s motion was insufficiently pled,
but it did not grant leave to amend the motion. Pursuant to Spera v. State,
971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007), a trial court is required to give a defendant the
opportunity to amend the motion. Therefore, as to ground six, we reverse
and remand for the trial court to provide appellant a limited time to amend
her motion to correct its legal insufficiency. In all other respects, we affirm.

   Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

                             *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.