Court Opinion

ID: 9551991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:02:56.772498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:25:21.738985
License: Public Domain

Brachtenbach, J.
(dissenting) — My dissent in the companion case of State v. Tacoma-Pierce County Multiple Listing Serv., 95 Wn.2d 280, 622 P.2d 1190 (1980), is largely in point in this case and is incorporated by reference.
The only different circumstance relates to the statutory provisions governing multiple listing associations. Real estate brokers are subject to all of the other regulatory mandates discussed in the companion case.
Based upon the mentioned dissent, I would require an administrative decision before allowing maintenance of this litigation.
Stafford and Hicks, JJ., concur with Brachtenbach, J.