Court Opinion

ID: 9417015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 20:00:39.936393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:21:35.106579
License: Public Domain

*127Mr. Justice Davis
dissenting.
, I agree to the legal propositions advanced by tbe court; but, in my opinion, the- evidence in tbis case does not warrant tbe application tbat bas been made of them.
It would serve no useful purpose to discuss tbe evidence, in ■ order to show tbat it is so; and I shall, therefore, content myself with saying, tbat it justified tbe conclusion reached by tbe court below, tbat tbe property should be divided between tbe parties. As the appeal only brought up tbe question of prop-erty rights, I am not at liberty to consider tbe merits of tbe decree for divorce. •