Court Opinion

ID: 9771914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 16:59:56.631265+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:41:00.708091
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Judge.
The State has asked that we distinguish the case at bar from our relatively recent case of Acuff v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 433 S.W.2d 902. This may be done simply. In Acuff, supra, there were no objections to the court’s charge while in the case at .bar appellant’s first ground of error was leveled at the court’s failure to grant his “timely presented requested charge.”
Remaining convinced of the soundness of our original opinion, the State’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
DOUGLAS, J., not participating.