Court Opinion

ID: 2938417
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 19:50:57.84076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:58.831790
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-68,907-01

DAVID HARRIS, Relator

v.

EL PASO COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 2002ODO5384-34
FROM EL PASO COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction
of this Court.  In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus District Clerk of El
Paso County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded
to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.  The respondent, the District Clerk of  El Paso
County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus
application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree
v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); by stating that the nature of the claims asserted
in the application filed by Relator is such that the claims are not cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
art. 11.07, § 3; or stating that Relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in El Paso County. 
This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has
submitted the appropriate response.  Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this
order.

Filed: December 12, 2007
Do not publish