Court Opinion

ID: 9513997
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 22:43:03.610791+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:07.529047
License: Public Domain

*103VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice,
concurring in the result.
[¶ 32] The second amended judgment was entered after the notice of appeal was filed from the amended judgment and there is no appeal from the second amended judgment. I agree with the majority that the second amended judgment is not before us on this appeal. Nevertheless, by attempting to enter a second amended judgment the district court obviously intended to further adjust the distribution of assets and debts to the parties. Because the majority opinion remands the matter to the district court for reconsideration of the distribution of the assets and debts of the parties, I concur in the result.
[¶ 33] DALE V. SANDSTROM.