Court Opinion

ID: 5084460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 13:34:47.190802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:04.918956
License: Public Domain

I respectfully dissent to the majority's disposition of point of error one. I would follow Justice McCraw's dissent inCustard v. State, 746 S.W.2d 4, 7 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1987, pet. ref'd.).1
1 As usual, the majority writer misconstrues the point. I am not relying on Justice McCraw's dissent as a source of law. Justice McCraw's words exist despite the ravings of the majority writer. Rather than plagiarize Justice McCraw, I have simply chosen a short hand method of adopting his analysis and conclusions. Perhaps this has struck a nerve since the majority writer has devoted two paragraphs to a "non-existent dissent".