Court Opinion

ID: 2847055
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 20:19:26.517723+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:50.950468
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-523-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

V.

ALLEN FRITZGERALD CALTON 						  APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 213
TH
 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “State’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. 
 Tex. R.
 
App
. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 
 See id.;
 
Tex. R. App. P.
 43.2(f).

It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  
See
 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. 
Ann. art. 
44.01(f) (Vernon Supp. 2004).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 
47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 25, 2004

FOOTNOTES
1:See
 
Tex. R. App. P.
 47.4.