Court Opinion

ID: 6328473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-30 21:00:32.871741+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:41.051881
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-10673      Date Filed: 03/30/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 20-10673
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANK H. BYNES, JR.,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Southern District of Georgia
          D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00153-LGW-CLR-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-10673        Date Filed: 03/30/2022    Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court               20-10673

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       George Asinc, appointed counsel for Frank Bynes, Jr., in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to An-
ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the rela-
tive merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina-
tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, coun-
sel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bynes’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.