Court Opinion

ID: 9890853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-16 17:01:23.819452+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.609883
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12526   Document: 5-1      Date Filed: 10/16/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-12526
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      BENJAMIN D. LOLLIS,
                                                     Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      CITY OF ATLANTA,

                                                   Defendant-Appellee.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-03768-TCB
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12526     Document: 5-1      Date Filed: 10/16/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-12526

      Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Benjamin Lollis, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s
      October 1, 2019, final order and judgment. The statutory time
      limit required Lollis to file a notice of appeal on or before Novem-
      ber 6, 2019, 30 days after the district court denied his motion to
      reconsider. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A); Fed.
      R. Civ. P. 59(e). However, Lollis did not file his notice of appeal
      until August 1, 2023.
             Additionally, there is no basis for relief under Federal Rules
      of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Lollis did not
      move for relief under either Rule until almost four years after the
      entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). Accordingly,
      the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate
      jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300
      (11th Cir. 2010).
              No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
       with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
       other applicable rules.