Court Opinion

ID: 9830644
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:20:57.693192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:25.162879
License: Public Domain

*66Motion for Rehearing.
In stating the facts of the case in our original opinion, we stated: “48,800 of these brick were used in the construction of a building on the south part of lot 145, in block No. 51, of'the City of San Augustine, Texas, being 45 feet wide in front and 80 feet deep. The remaining 51,200 were sold to various and sundry people.” This statement was made under the erroneous opinion that the evidence on this point was undisputed. Appellant, in its motion for rehearing, has called our attention to other evidence in the record which tends to show that all of the $100,000 brick were used in the construction of said building. Therefore the actual number of the brick which were used in the building was a controverted issue of fact.
With this correction in our original opinion, the motion for rehearing is overruled.