Court Opinion

ID: 4128853
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 00:43:37.23931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:36.087342
License: Public Domain

ATTORNEY GENERAL                     OF    TEXAS
                                             GREG       ABBOTT

                                                August 30,2004

The Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray                            Opinion No. GA-0242
Llano County Attorney
Llano County Courthouse                                 Re: Whether a commissioners court may hold an
801 Ford, Room 111                                      election that creates an emergency service district
Llano, Texas 78643                                      and imposes a sales and use tax within the proposed
                                                        district’s boundaries  (RQ-0202-GA)

Dear Ms. Mabray:

        You ask about creating an emergency services district (“ESD”) pursuant to Health and Safety
Code chapter 776.’ You state that Llano County called for an election to create an ESD in 2002, but
it was not approved because the citizens did not want more ad valorem taxes. See Request Letter,
supra note 1, at 1; Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0392 (2001) (concerning creation of an ESD in Llano
County). Many voters have stated that they would vote for an ESD funded with a one cent sales and
use tax because everyone pays it, unlike an ad valorem tax paid only by property owners. See
Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. You also state that Llano County citizens have considered
adopting a county health services sales and use tax under Tax Code chapter 324, and you ask
whether the county may do so. See id. at 2.

         We first address the creation of an ESD. The Llano County Commissioners                    Court wishes
to call an election with a petition that includes the following wording:

                  The ESD will provide for emergency medical service within the
                  district. The district is to be created and is to operate under Article
                  III, Section 48-e, Texas Constitution with a levy on the ad valorem
                  property situated in said district not to exceed zero cents (0) on the
                  One Hundred Dollars ($100) valuation for the support thereof;
                  provided that no tax shall be levied in support of said district until
                  approved by vote ofthe qualified voters residing herein. Said district
                  is to be created and is to operate under the adoption of a not to exceed
                  one cent (1) sales and use tax.

Id. Accordingly,   you ask whether the commissioners        court may call an election to create an
emergency services district and at the same time call an election for a sales and use tax not to exceed
one percent in the emergency service district boundaries. See id. at 1.

         ‘Letter from Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray, Llano County Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney
General (Mar. 1,2004) (on file with the Opinion Committee, also availableat hnp://www.oag.state.tx.us) [hereinafter
Request Letter].
The Honorable      Cheryl1 Mabray       - Page 2            (GA-0242)

         Texas Constitution      article III, section 48-e, provides for establishing             ESDs as follows:

                           Laws may be enacted to provide for the establishment and
                  creation of special districts to provide emergency services and to
                  authorize the commissioners courts ofparticipating counties to levy
                  a tax on the ad valorem property situated in said districts not to
                  exceed Ten Cents (106) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)
                  valuation for the support thereof; provided that no tax shall be levied
                  in support of said districts until approved by a vote of the qualified
                  voters residing therein.     Such a district may provide emergency
                  medical services, emergency ambulance services, rural tire prevention
                  and control services, or other emergency services authorized by the
                  Legislature.

TEX. CONST. art. III, 5 48-e (added Nov. 3,1987; amended Nov. 2,1999). Pursuant to section 48-e,
the legislature adopted Health and Safety Code chapter 776, authorizing the creation of ESDs in
counties with a population of 125,000 or less. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 776.003
(Vernon 2003); see also id. ch. 775 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004) (authorizing the creation of
ESDs without a population restriction). Llano County has a population of approximately 17,500
persons. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.’

          To create an ESD located wholly within Llano County pursuant to chapter 776, “a petition
signed by at least 100 qualified voters who own taxable real property in the proposed district must
be filed with the county judge.” See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 776.01 l(a) (Vernon
2003). The petition must show “that the district is to be created and is to operate under Article III,
Section 48-e,” the proposed district’s name and boundaries, the services it will provide, that its
creation complies with Health and Safety Code section 776.021, which pertains to overlapping
districts, and certain information pertaining to the petitioners. Id. 5 776.013. After the countyjudge
receives the petition and tiles it with the county clerk, the commissioners court schedules a hearing
to consider the petition. See id. 5 776.015(a)-(b).

          Notice of the hearing must state, among other things, that the district is to be created and
operate under Texas Constitution article III, section 48-e, the name of the proposed district, and its
boundaries and functions. See id. § 776.015(c). At the hearing, the commissioners court “shall
consider the petition and each issue relating to the creation of the district,” and any interested person
may appear “to support or oppose creation ofthe district.” Id. 5 776.016(a)-(b). “If after the hearing
the commissioners court finds that the proposed district is feasible, will benefit the territory in the
district, will secure the public safety, welfare, and convenience, and will aid in conserving the real
property or natural resources .        , the commissioners court shall grant the petition and fix the
district’s boundaries.” Id. 8 776.017(a). On granting a petition, the commissioners court “shall order
an election to confirm the district’s creation and authorize the levy of a tax not to exceed the rate
allowed by Section 48-e, Article III, Texas Constitution.” Id. 776.019(a). “If a majority of the votes

          ‘See U.S. Census Bureau, Texas QuickFacts   Llano County,   nvailobleat http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states
/48/48299.html (visited July 29, 2004).
The Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray      - Page 3         (GA-0242)

cast in the election favor confirmation, the district is created.” Id. 776.020(a). The commissioners
court of a county in which a single-county district is located appoints a five-member board of
emergency commissioners to serve as the district’s governing body. See id. 5 776.033(a) (Vernon
Supp. 2004).

         Attorney General Opinion JM-1010 addressed legislation implementing Texas Constitution
article III, section 48-e. The commissioners court, acting under the predecessor of Health and Safety
Code chapter 775, wished to limit the tax to be levied in support of an ESD to a maximum rate of
six cents per $100 valuation and to provide for that amount in the election order. See Tex. Att’y
Gen. Op. No. JM-1010 (1989) at 1 (addressing former article 235la-8, Revised Civil Statutes). The
statute stated that “the commissioners court shall call an election to confirm the organization and
authorize the levy of an ad valorem tax in an amount not to exceed ten cents on the $100 valuation.”
See Act ofMay 22, 1987,7Oth Leg., R.S., ch. 673, 5 8, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 2495,2496 (formerly
codified as section 8, article 2351a-8, Revised Civil Statutes). Opinion JM-1010 found the statute
to be ambiguous as to whether it required the election order to include the maximum constitutional
rate often cents on the $100 valuation or allowed the commissioners court to set a lower maximum
tax rate in the election order. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JM-1010 (1989) at 3. AAer reviewing
the relevant provisions in context, the opinion concluded that the statute did not allow the
commissioners court any discretion as to the maximum tax rate and the election order must track the
statutory language as to tax rate. See id. at 4. Attorney General Opinion JC-0392 also concluded
that an election order to establish an ESD must strictly conform to statutory language stating the tax
rate. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0392 at 4 (construing a prior version of Health and Safety
Code section 776.019). More importantly, opinion K-0392 determined that article III, section 48-e
did not bar the legislature from adopting statutes authorizing the levy of a tax less than ten cents on
the $100. See id. at 5.

         Amendments to chapter776 that became effective following the issuance ofopinion JC-0392
allow the commissioners court to set the maximum property tax rate for an ESD at less than ten cents
per $100 valuation. See Act ofMay28,2001,77th      Leg., R.S., ch.1140, 5 6,200l Tex. Gen. Laws
2542, 2543-44. Section 776.019(a) was amended to provide as follows: “On the granting of a
petition, the commissioners  court shall order an election to confirm the district’s creation and
authorize the levy of a tax not to exceed the rate allowed by Section 48-e, Article ZZZ,Texas
Constitution.” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 776.019(a) (Vernon 2003) (adopted by Act
of May 28,2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch.1140, 5 6, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 2542,2544) (language of
amendment emphasized).

          Although the amendment to section 776.019(a) does not expressly state that the election
order may authorize a maximum tax rate of less than ten cents on the $100 property valuation, the
legislative history is explicit on this point. A bill analysis states that the 2001 enactment amends the
Health and Safety Code to provide that the tax rate of an ESD “is any rate allowed by the Texas
Constitution.” HOUSE COMM. ON COUNTY AFFAIRS, BILL ANALYSIS, Tex. H.B. 2744, 77th Leg.,
R.S. (2001). Moreover, the same 2001 enactment included another provision regarding the
maximum tax rate for an ESD. Section 776.0755 provides as follows:
The Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray - Page 4                    (GA-0242)

                           Aboard [ofemergencycommissioners]3mayorderanelection
                  to increase the maximum tax rate of the district to any rate at or below
                  the rate allowed by Section 48-e, article III, Texas Constitution. The
                  proposition on the ballot must state the proposed maximum tax rate
                  to be authorized at the election.

TEX.HEALTH&SAFETYCODEANN. 3 776.0755(a) (Vemon2003)(adoptedbyActofMay28,2001,
77th Leg., R.S., ch.1140, § 6,200l Tex. Gen. Laws 2542,2544). This provision must mean that an
ESD may be created with a maximum property tax rate of less than ten cents on the $100 valuation.
Otherwise, the ESD board could not possibly seek to increase the maximum tax rate and the above
provision would be meaningless.        See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 311.021(2) (Vernon 1998)
(presumption that the entire statute is intended to be effective). The commissioners court’s election
order may authorize a maximum property tax rate at any rate up to and including the ten cents on
$100 valuation allowed by article III, section 48-e. Of course, once an ESD is established, it may
tax in any year at less than the maximum rate that it has adopted. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JM-
1010 at 5; see also TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. $776.075(a) (Vernon 2003) (board shall
annually impose an ad valorem tax on real and personal property in the district for the district’s
support and the purposes of chapter 776).

         A tax rate of zero is not unprecedented. See N. Shore MRZ Ctr. v. Ill. Dep ‘tof Revenue, 723
N.E.2d 726, 728 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999) (zero percent tax rate for certain goods provided by statute);
Op. MO. Att’y Gen. No. 69-2004 (ambulance district set its property tax rate at zero in shifting to
support by sales tax). We assume that the newly created ESD will not have any bonded indebtedness
or obligations to third parties that will be jeopardized by the absence of any property tax support.

         However, the commissioners court is not authorized to call an election to adopt a sales tax
to support an ESD. No sales and use tax may be adopted until after a district has been confirmed
and the commissioners court has appointed its board. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN.
§ 776.033(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004). “A district may adopt a sales and use tax . at an election
held as provided by Section 776.0752.” Id. 5 776,0751(a) (V emon 2003) (emphasis added). “An
election [to adopt a sales and use tax] is called by the adoption of a resolution by the board.” Id.
5 776.0752(b) (emphasis added). At the election, the ballot shall permit voting “for or against the
proposition: ‘The adoption of a local sales and use tax in (name of district) at the rate of (proposed
tax rate) percent.“’ Id. 5 776.0752(c).

         We conclude in answer to your question that the commissioners court may not order an
election to create an emergency service district and at the same time impose a sales and use tax
within the proposed district’s boundaries. If the election order sets the maximum property tax rate
at zero, the board is unlikely to have the funds necessary to pay board members’ expenses or the
expenses of an election to adopt a sales and use tax. But see id. § 776.031(5) (district may accept
and receive donations). Thus, while there may not be a legal impediment against setting the tax rate
at zero, it may be impossible as a practical matter to establish an ESD with a zero tax rate.

        “‘Board”meanstheboardofemergencycommissioners.       S~~TD(.HEALTH&SAFE~CODEANN.     ~776.001(1)
(Vemon2003).
The Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray - Page 5              (GA-0242)

        You also ask whether Llano County may adopt a sales and use tax under Tax Code chapter
324, which authorizes a county with a population of 50,000 or less to adopt a one-half percent sales
and use tax to provide health services in the county. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2; TEX.
TAXCODEANN. $4 324.021-.022, .081 (Vernon2002) (tax shall beadoptedorabolishedbyelection
in the county). A county may not adopt the sales and use tax if as a result “the combined rate of all
sales and use taxes imposed by the county and other political subdivisions having territory in the
county would exceed two percent at any location in the county.” TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 324.021(b)
(Vernon 2002) (emphasis added). You state that the one-half percent tax rate authorized by Tax
Code chapter 324 combined with the rate of sales and use taxes established in the City of Llano
would exceed a two percent tax rate within the city. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2.

         Chapter 324 requires the sales and use tax to be established throughout the county. It must
be approved “at an election held in the county,” and the ballot shall permit adopting a “local sales
and use tax in (name of county).” TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 5s 324.021(a), .061(b) (Vernon 2002).
These chapter 324 provisions may be contrasted with Health and Safety Code section 776.013(3),
which requires the petition to establish an ESD to describe the “proposed district’s boundaries as
designated by metes and bounds or other sufficient legal description,” and section 776.020(d),
requiring the commissioners courts’ order recognizing the ESD’s creation to “insert description [of
district] unless the district is countywide.” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 776.013(3),
.020(d) (Vernon 2003). Nothing in chapter 324 provides for establishing the sales and use tax in an
area less than the entire county. Llano Countymaynot    adopt the sales and use tax authorized by Tax
Code chapter 324 if that tax, when combined with the rate of sales and use taxes imposed by the
county and other political subdivisions having territory in the county, would exceed two percent
anywhere in the county. See TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 5 324.021(b) (Vernon 2002). See generally
Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Sys., Inc., 996 S.W.2d 864, 865-66 (Tex. 1999) (court
construes a statute by looking to the plain meaning of its language). If the one-half percent tax rate
authorized by Tax Code chapter 324 combined with the rate of sales and use taxes established in the
City of Llano would exceed a two percent tax rate within the city, Llano County may not adopt the
sales and use tax authorized by chapter 324.
The Honorable Cheryl1 Mabray - Page 6               (GA-0242)

                                         SUMMARY

                        Health and Safety Code chapter 776 does not authorize a
               commissioners     court to call an election to create an emergency
               service district and at the same time call for an election for a sales and
               use tax in the emergency service district boundaries.       The election
               order must provide for an election to confirm the district’s creation
               and authorize the levy of a property tax, setting the maximum tax rate
               at any rate that does not exceed the ten cents on the $100 valuation
               allowed by Texas Constitution article III, section 48-e. Only the
               district board may call an election to adopt a sales and use tax.

                       Tax Code chapter 324 provides for a county-wide sales and
               use tax to fund county health services. A county may not adopt the
               chapter 324 tax if the tax rate authorized by that chapter combined
               with the rate of all sales and use taxes imposed in any city within the
               county exceeds two percent in that city.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                Attorney General of Texas

BARRY R. MCBEE
First Assistant Attorney General

DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee

Susan L. Garrison
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee