Court Opinion

ID: 8273256
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:39:06.917485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:35.548846
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be reversed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Ganison in the case of George A. Rounsaville v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, No. 81 of the November term, 1915, recently decided in this court upon the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Amy L. Winfield (opinion by Mr. Justice Van Devanter), 244 U. S. 170.
*714For affirmance—None.
For reversal—The Chancellor., Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.