Court Opinion

ID: 685988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:32+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:24.683566
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1468
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Barry D. BRIDGES, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6786.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 4, 1994Decided Nov. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.  (CR-92-15-A, CR-92-144-A, CA-93-382-R)
Barry D. Bridges, appellant pro se.
Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, Va., for appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Bridges, Nos.  CR-92-15-A, CR-92-144-A, CA-93-382-R (W.D.Va. June 30, 1994).  We deny Bridges's motion for appointment of counsel.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED