Court Opinion

ID: 6685710
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:32:26.253581+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:00:57.744964
License: Public Domain

Odliw, Judge,
delivered the following opinion':'
In this case tbe treasurer of Porto Eico presented to the referee a claim for income taxes amounting to $1,941.60, which had been assessed upon an alleged income accrued to the bankrupt amounting to $33,703.32 as returned by the bankrupt on November 26, 1920, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 19k0. And there was also filed a similar claim by the treasurer of Porto Eico for the sum of $1,783.04 based upon the alleged net income of the bankrupt amounting to $29,100.64 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1919. And the treasurer of Porto Eico *425asks this court to review and to set aside' the finding of the referee dated May 3, 1922, which finding was to the effect that the bankrupt had no actual income, and that therefore the claim of the treasurer of Porto Pico should be rejected.
It is conceded that the Bankruptcy Law provides that taxes, shall bo a first and prior claim, provided they arc lawfully and justly due. It seems that persons in Porto Pico in failing circumstances have in some instances deliberately stated to the public authorities that they received a large net income, when, as a matter of fact, they had-received little or no net income. The purpose of this fictitious and false representation to the taxing-authorities was probably to bolster up a falling credit, and to-continue business which was actually unprofitable. At all events, the report of the referee shows to my mind very satisfactorily that the income tax reports which had been made to the taxing authorities of Porto Pico by P. Suarez & Company, S. en C., the bankrupt firm, were false and fictitious, and, under the authorities of other Federal courts, it would be unjust to take from the actual bona fide creditors of the bankrupt all or any part of the proceeds of the bankrupt estate in order to pay to the public authorities taxes upon nonexistent assets. In other Avords, the courts have held that taxes of this nature are not laA\--fully and justly due within the meaning of the act of Congress. The referee specifically finds that P. Suarez & Company, S. en 0., had no actual profit whatever in the fiscal year which ended Juno 30, 1919, nor in the fiscal year which ended June 30? 1920.
For the reasons aboAre stated, the repoi-t of the referee in bankruptcy is hereby approved and confirmed; and the peti*426tion filed by counsel for tbe treasurer of Porto Pico for a review is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.