Court Opinion

ID: 1004122
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:40.240777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:30.545786
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7717

ROBERT EARL WASHINGTON,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-00-1482)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert Earl Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.    See Washington v. Angelone,

No. CA-00-1482 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 23, 2000; entered Oct. 26,

2000).   We deny Washington’s motion to supplement the record be-

cause the proposed documents are already contained in the record.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2