Court Opinion

ID: 1077734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 20:24:19.503688+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:17.196524
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                                   AT JACKSON
                  ______________________________________________

ADRIAN PATE, A MINOR, BY AND FROM THE TENNESSEE CLAIMS
THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT COMMISSION, HON. MARTHA
FRIEND, MELISSA PATE,             B. BRASFIELD, COMMISSIONER

       Plaintiff-Appellant,                           Claims Commission No. 96001645
                                                      C.A. No. 02A01-9803-BC-00060
Vs.                                                   AFFIRMED

STATE OF TENNESSEE,                           William B. Raiford, III; Merkel
                                                     & Cocke of Clarksdale, MS
       Defendant-Appellee.                    For Appellant

           FILED                          Beauchamp E. Brogan, General
                                          Counsel, Odell Horton, Jr., Associate
        December 28, 1998                 General Counsel, The University of
                                          Tennessee
        Cecil Crowson, Jr.                For Appellee
____________________________________________________________________________
        Appellate C ourt Clerk

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION1
___________________________________________________________________________

CRAWFORD, J.

       This is a medical malpractice case that comes to this Court from the Tennessee Claims

Commission. Plaintiff, Adrian Pate, a minor by and through his mother and next friend, Melissa

Pate, appeals the order of the Commission dismissing the case against the State of Tennessee.

The only issue presented for review is whether the Commission abused its discretion in

dismissing claimant’s complaint with prejudice.

       Plaintiff filed a notice of claim with the State of Tennessee, Division of Claims

Administration, on June 7, 1996, and it was transferred to the Tennessee Claims Commission

on September 9, 1996. Proceedings before the Commission are conducted pursuant to Tennessee

Rules of Civil Procedure. T.C.A. § 9-7-403 (1992). The State filed its answer on October 21,

1996. The next event reflected in the record is the State’s motion to dismiss pursuant to

Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 41.02 for failure to prosecute filed November 17, 1997.

Claimant’s response to the motion to dismiss sets forth no action taken by claimant since the

       1
         Rule 10 (Court of Appeals). Memorandum Opinion. -- (b) The Court, with the
concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of
the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential
value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated
"MEMORANDUM OPINION," shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any
reason in a subsequent unrelated case.
filing of the complaint, nor is there anything in the record to reflect any action taken by the

claimant.

       T.C.A. § 9-8-402 (b)(1992) provides in pertinent part: “Any claim upon which no action

is taken by the claimant within one (1) year of the filing date shall be dismissed.”

       The record reflects that shortly after the claim was filed, the Claims Commissioner by

letter notified counsel, among other things, of the above-quoted statutory provision.

       There simply is nothing in the record before us to indicate that the Commissioner abused

his discretion. When the sanction of dismissal is exercised, the discretionary action by the trial

court will not be disturbed by this Court in the absence of an affirmative showing that the trial

judge abused his discretion. Holt v. Webster, 638 S.W.2d 391, 394 (Tenn. App. 1982).

       Accordingly, the order of the Claims Commission is affirmed, and this case is dismissed.

Costs of appeal are assessed against the appellant.

                                                      _________________________________
                                                      W. FRANK CRAWFORD,
                                                      PRESIDING JUDGE, W.S.

CONCUR:

____________________________________
ALAN E. HIGHERS, JUDGE

____________________________________
HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, JUDGE

                                                2