Court Opinion

ID: 6260501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-17 22:02:14.617876+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:59:41.768390
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Me. Justice Roberts:
I dissent because the entry of summary judgment is not an appropriate disposition of this controversy. A review of the record reveals “genuine issues” as to “material facts” which require adjudication thereby precluding the entry of judgment as a matter of law. See Linwood Harvestore, Inc. v. Cannon, 427 Pa. 434, 235 A. 2d 377 (1967). I would vacate the entry of judgment and let the case proceed on the merits.
Mr. Justice O’Brien joins in this dissent.