Court Opinion

ID: 624709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-03-06 19:31:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:08.177752
License: Public Domain

ORDER AND JUDGMENT
  
   *
  

  PER CURIAM.
 

  The issues presented in this appeal have been previously decided. Counsel were given an opportunity to distinguish our prior cases but Appellant’s counsel used that opportunity to criticize, rather than
   
   *771
   
  distinguish, them. There is nothing more to say. AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.
   
    See
   
   Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.