Court Opinion

ID: 4232295
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-12-25 14:23:09.693307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:01.997265
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-87,541-01

                          EX PARTE SERGIO GORDILLO, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 1273425-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HARRIS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gordillo v. State, No. 01-13-00477-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st

Dist.] Feb. 19, 2015)(not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to adequately prepare Applicant for his punishment testimony. Applicant also alleges that

counsel made an unsound decision to call Applicant’s former girlfriend, which enabled the State to
                                                                                                       2

elicit harmful testimony.

        The trial court has made findings that counsel performed deficiently, but Applicant was not

prejudiced. However, Applicant alleges that counsel’s deficient performance during the punishment

phase undermines confidence in the forty-five year sentence where the judge initially said that she

would sentence applicant to twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

        Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. The trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent

Applicant. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s

deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings of fact

and conclusions of law as to whether the judge initially said she would sentence Applicant to twenty-

five years’ imprisonment. The trial court shall also make findings of fact and conclusions of law as

to whether the judge’s decision to sentence Applicant to forty-five years was solely based on the

testimony elicited by the State from Applicant’s former girlfriend and/or because of Applicant’s

refusal to admit to committing the extraneous offense or feeling remorse for committing said offense.

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems
                                                                                                      3

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 20, 2017
Do not publish