Court Opinion

ID: 48543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:43:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:23.798765
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 13, 2007

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                            No. 06-40369
                        Conference Calendar

TERRY LEE SCOTT,

                                    Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN CHILDRESS,
                                    Respondent-Appellee.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 1:06-CV-12
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Terry Lee Scott, federal prisoner # 62305-079, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

challenging the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

cocaine and crack cocaine.

     Scott argues under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because it

was enhanced based upon facts found by a judge.   The decision in

Booker does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 06-40369
                                 -2-

review, and a Booker claim does not satisfy the test for filing a

§ 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005).

     For the first time on appeal, Scott raises a factual

challenge to the district court’s application of a four-level

enhancement for his being a leader or organizer of the criminal

activity.   This newly raised factual claim is not reviewable for

the first time on appeal.   See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder

Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).

     AFFIRMED.