Court Opinion

ID: 9748011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 15:48:23.442743+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:30.215516
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Remaining convinced that our original disposition was correct, we overrule the motion for rehearing of Gary O. Gardner, *439Beulah Darlene Gardner, and Hollister Gardner, with these additional comments.
The Gardners allege error in our decision based upon our consideration of the jurisdiction question because it was not raised by Sheriff Stewart and Judge Self. However, they overlook our holding that we did not have jurisdiction to address the issues, and references in our January 14, 2004, Memorandum Opinion on Motion for Rehearing in Cause No. 07-02-0513-CV, to section 65.023 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Annotated (Vernon 1997), and to Butron v. Cantu, 960 S.W.2d 91, 95 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1997, no writ).
Accordingly, the Gardners’ motion for rehearing is overruled.