Court Opinion

ID: 3914501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:42:36.936737+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:44.049168
License: Public Domain

Conviction for passing a forged instrument, the punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. The indictment contains two counts: one charging forgery, and the other knowingly passing as true a forged instrument. The first count was quashed. The only insistence of appellant that we deem necessary to review is the error assigned that the court erred in holding that the *Page 535 
State was not required to prove that the City National Bank of Decatur was a corporation; the second count of the indictment having alleged that appellant did wilfully, knowingly and fraudulently pass as true to the City National Bank of Decatur, Texas, a corporation, a false and forged instrument in writing. Whether necessary or not to allege that the bank was incorporated, we think, however, it was necessary to prove it after making the allegation. This cannot be justly treated as surplusage. We therefore hold that it was necessary to prove the incorporation of said bank. Usher v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 921; Lucas v. State, 39 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Webb v. State,39 Tex. Crim. 534. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.