Court Opinion

ID: 2690517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:46:33.352609+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:53:07.964521
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, 135 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2013-Ohio-19.]

                     CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARTKE.
 [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, 135 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2013-Ohio-19.]
     (No. 2011-1774—Submitted January 7, 2013—Decided January 9, 2013.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney
Registration No. 0011584, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2012,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of
publication.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur.
                               ______________________