Court Opinion

ID: 7546532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:35:25.822198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:56.745579
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION TO REVIEW BOND
PER CURIAM.
The husband has filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 9.310(f), Fla.R.App.P., to review the amount of bond established by the trial court. In response, the wife has confessed error, admitting that the present dollar figure is too high. See generally Rule 9.310, Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, the trial court’s bond determination is reversed and the cause is remanded for imposition of a more appropriate figure.
GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.