Court Opinion

ID: 9657464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 20:27:04.726883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:44.727891
License: Public Domain

HARRIS, Justice
(concurring).
I strongly agree that the case should be affirmed and join in divisions I, III, and IV of the majority opinion. I concur only in the result in division II for the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Myers, 382 N.W.2d 91, 98 (Iowa 1986). I believe the proper scope of review on that issue should be for an abuse of discretion. I think the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged expert testimony.
LARSON and WOLLE, JJ., join this special concurrence.