Court Opinion

ID: 9553133
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:22:47.066281+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:29:46.761093
License: Public Domain

KAUS, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I agree fully with the majority opinion, except as to one minor point: I do not think petitioners were charged with facts which would constitute a violation of rule 2-101(A)(4), nor do I believe that such a violation was proven. It seems to me that petitioners’ communications fairly trumpet their availability for professional employment.
*632This minor difference of opinion in no way affects my agreement with the discipline imposed.
Petitioners’ application for a rehearing was denied September 25, 1985. Bird, C. J., and Grodin, J., were of the opinion that the application should be granted.