Court Opinion

ID: 4176409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-09 19:14:17.496538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:41.908958
License: Public Domain

People v Clark (2017 NY Slip Op 04703)

People v Clark

2017 NY Slip Op 04703

Decided on June 9, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 9, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

772 KA 14-01706

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vSIERRA CLARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered May 9, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree (two counts). 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of two counts of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [3]). We agree with defendant that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude her challenge on appeal to the severity of the sentence. Although the record reflects that defendant executed a written waiver of the right to appeal, County Court "did not inquire of defendant whether [s]he understood the written waiver or whether [s]he had even read the waiver before signing it" (People v Grucza, 145 AD3d 1505, 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Thus, the record establishes that the court failed to ensure that "defendant . . . entered a knowing, intelligent and voluntary appeal waiver" (People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). We nevertheless reject defendant's contention that the bargained-for sentence is unduly harsh and severe.
Entered: June 9, 2017
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court