Court Opinion

ID: 9841401
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-22 11:09:20.177553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:33.853669
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                         TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                No. 10-23-00158-CV

LARRY PALMER,
                                                           Appellant
v.

STELCO INDUSTRIES,
                                                           Appellee

                           From the 40th District Court
                               Ellis County, Texas
                              Trial Court No. 101356

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant Larry Palmer’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal was filed on

August 29, 2023. Appellant asserts that he “no longer desires to prosecute this action”

and moves to dismiss the appeal. Appellee Stelco Industries is not opposed to the motion.

      Accordingly, appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Because appellee does not oppose appellant’s motion, which requests that “all costs to be

borne by the party incurring same,” we order that costs of this proceeding are taxed
against the party incurring same. See id. at R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties,

the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).

                                                     STEVE SMITH
                                                     Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson,
       and Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2023
[CV06]

Palmer v. Stelco Indus.                                                             Page 2