Court Opinion

ID: 7798735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-08-08 14:00:17.320169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:51.397082
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40080     Document: 00516421692         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/05/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                                                       FILED
                                                                  August 5, 2022
                                  No. 22-40080                    Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Nelson Ramos-Perez,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:20-CR-90-2

   Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Nelson
   Ramos-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
   accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
   v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Perez has not filed a response.

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-40080     Document: 00516421692         Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/05/2022

                                  No. 22-40080

   We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
   reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
   presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
   motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
   further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2