Court Opinion

ID: 1010841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:18:01.928511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:11.405498
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 03-6610

CEDRIC HOLLEY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

EMILIO PAGAN,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-536-5-3F)

Submitted:   June 12, 2003                 Decided:   June 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedric Holley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Cedric Holley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).   We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Holley v. Pagan, No. CA-02-536-5-3F (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 1, 2003).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2