Court Opinion

ID: 9406593
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-01 10:12:01.756711+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:31.534412
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00113-CV

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                          TYLER, TEXAS

AUTHOR JAMES MANNING, JR.,                              §       APPEAL FROM THE 4TH DISTRICT
APPELLANT
                                                        §       COURT
V.
                                                        §       RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS
VIACOM CBS, INC.,
APPELLEE

                                       MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                           PER CURIAM

        This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
        On May 5, 2023, Author James Manning, Jr., acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from
a dismissal for want of prosecution. That same day, the Clerk of this Court notified Manning
that the notice of appeal failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 9.5.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (requiring service on parties).2 The notice
warned that, unless Manning filed a proper notice of appeal on or before June 5, the appeal
would be referred to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and Manning has not filed a
compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice.

        1   Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all
applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties
represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3
(Tex. App.—Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).

         2 The notice of appeal also failed to comply with Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and

Remedies Code, which requires service on court reporters, and this Court notified Manning of said defect. See TEX.
CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court
reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). However, this case was dismissed for want of prosecution in
the court below and the docketing statement reflects that no record was taken; thus, we decline to dismiss on this
basis.
         Because Manning failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5, the appeal is dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties,
appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because appellant failed to
comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a
response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered June 30, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                             JUNE 30, 2023

                                         NO. 12-23-00113-CV

                               AUTHOR JAMES MANNING, JR.,
                                        Appellant
                                           V.
                                   VIACOM CBS, INC.,
                                        Appellee

                                  Appeal from the 4th District Court
                           of Rusk County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2021-288)

                    THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same
being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed.

                    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
below for observance.

                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J