Court Opinion

ID: 6065814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 16:33:09.920704+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:01.001567
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered August 15, 2014. The order granted the motion of defendant Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, to dismiss the second amended complaint against it and dismissed the second amended complaint against that defendant.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion of defendant Conestoga-Rovers & Associates seeking to *1323dismiss the second amended complaint against it and reinstating the second amended complaint against that defendant except insofar as the third and fourth causes of action assert claims by each plaintiff as parent and natural guardian of an infant child or children, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Abbo-Bradley v City of Niagara Falls ([appeal No. 1] 132 AD3d 1318 [2015]).
Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.