Court Opinion

ID: 3107331
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:12:40.325675+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:49.626871
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00635-CR
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
 
MAXINE
C. VALENZUELA,                                                          Appellant,
 
                                                             v.
 
THE
STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               On
appeal from 36th District Court 
                                   of
San Patricio County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
                          Before
Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes
                               Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Maxine C. Valenzuela, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss
her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  Without
passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.  Having
dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are
dismissed as moot.
 
PER CURIAM
Do not
publish.  See Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).  
Delivered and filed the
17th day of March, 2011.