Court Opinion

ID: 8310614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 13:47:51.545009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:44:42.771329
License: Public Domain

Treat, J.,
(orally.) I do not propose this morning to go through a detailed consideration of the record in this case. It suffices that the second railroad corporation, which was the successor of the first railroad corporation, issued bonds. The subject-matter of the validity of those bonds was fully heard in a court of competent jurisdiction, and the bonds were pronounced void. Now, here is an attempt to charge the successor of the second corporation with those bonds, which have already been pronounced invalid, without any allegations that would enable the court to fasten on the third corporation void obligations. I cannot understand the theory of the bill to be within any rule of law or equity, and it suffices that the state of the record shows that there is nothing to charge these parties defendants with any of those obligations.
The decree of the court will be that the bill be dismissed, with costs.