Court Opinion

ID: 9384972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-05 18:01:13.005955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:57.989493
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10753    Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 04/05/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10753
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       BENJAMIN EUGENE WALTER,

                                                  Defendant- Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                 D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00073-AKK-GMB-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10753      Document: 27-1     Date Filed: 04/05/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-10753

       Before WILSON, JORDAN, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Perry Russel Steen, appointed counsel for Benjamin Eugene
       Walter in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
       further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walter’s convictions and
       sentences are AFFIRMED.