Court Opinion

ID: 2905332
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 22:58:10.79939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:24.419289
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-05-224 CR

____________________

MARY MARGARET HOLLAND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 94136

MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)
	Mary Margaret Holland was convicted and sentenced on an indictment for
aggravated assault.  Holland filed a notice of appeal on May 24, 2005.  The trial court
entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that
this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(a)(2).  The trial court's certification has been provided to the Court of Appeals by the
district clerk.
	On May 26, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless
an amended certification was filed within thirty days of the date of the notice and made a
part of the appellate record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1.  The record has not been
supplemented with an amended certification.  Because a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record, the appeal must be
dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
								PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered July 13, 2005
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.