Court Opinion

ID: 3113967
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:19:49.585367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:31:55.236204
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-10-0309-CV

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                  AT AMARILLO

                                    PANEL A

                              SEPTEMBER 21, 2010

                        ______________________________

                           JOHNNY LEE REY, APPELLANT

                                      V.

                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                       _________________________________

              FROM THE DISTRICT 251[ST] COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

                   NO. 6989-C; HONORABLE ANA ESTEVEZ, JUDGE

                        _______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Johnny Lee Rey, was convicted of murder in 1995 and sentenced to life in prison.  On February 23, 2010, the trial court signed an Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds pursuant to section 501.014(e) of the Texas Government Code for "court costs, fines and fees" in the amount of $74,509.65.  On March 15, 2010, Appellant filed a Motion to Strike/Withdraw Void Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds challenging the trial court's February 23, 2010 order.  Appellant's motion was denied by written order on June 25, 2010.  Appellant timely filed a Motion for New Trial and Notice of Appeal challenging the trial court's June 25, 2010 order.  
On September 9, 2010, the trial court clerk filed a Supplemental Clerk's Record containing an Order Granting New Trial reflecting that Appellant's Motion to Strike/Withdraw Void Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds had been reinstated on the trial court's docket. 
The legal effect of an order granting a new trial is to vacate the original judgment and return the case to the trial court as if no judgment had been entered.  See Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Scott, 846 S.W.3d 832, 833 (Tex. 1993).  See also Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Long John Silvers, Inc. v. Martinez, 850 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1993, writ dismd w.o.j.).  Thus, there is no final judgment or order from which an appeal may be prosecuted in this case. 
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
						Per Curiam