Court Opinion

ID: 4933881
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 01:11:53.031682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:35.551428
License: Public Domain

"Wai/tos-, J.
Any town, which has been made chargeable, and has paid, for the commitment and support of an insane person at the insane hospital, may recover the amount paid of the insane person, "if able.” Such is the language of the statute. 11. S., c. 143, § 20. The question is whether, if he is not able to pay the whole, he can be required to pay a part of the expenses thus u incurred, so that, upon a hearing in damages, evidence of his ability is admissible to reduce the amount to be recovered below the amount actually paid. We think not. A similar question was before the court in an action to recover the expenses incurred in taking care of a person sick with the small pox, and the court held that if the person taken care of was not able to pay the whole amount, he was not liable to pay any portion of it. Orono v. Peavey, 66 Maine, 60. The two statutes, in this particular, are precisely alike, and must, we think, receive the same interpretation. The evidence offered was properly excluded.

^Exceptions overruled.

AppletoN, C. J., Barrows, Virgust, Libbey and Symoxds, JJ., concurred.