Court Opinion

ID: 4930008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 01:06:09.965919+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:26.276919
License: Public Domain

Appleton, J.
The mode provided by statute for the recovery of the dividend on an insolvent estate, when the administrator or executor, upon demand, neglects or refuses to pay, is by suit upon the administration bond, for the benefit of all who may be interested. E. S., c. 113, § 10.
It has likewise been decided that debt may be maintained upon the decree of distribution, of the Judge of Probate, and that a judgment upon the administration bond is no bar to this remedy, it being merely a cumulative remedy, by the stipulation of sureties. Storer v. Storer, 6 Mass. 390. So it was held in New York, that debt might be maintained on the decree of a surrogate for the payment of money. Dubois v. Dubois, 6 Cow. 494. It likewise lies upon the order of a Court of Sessions. Rice v. Barre Turnpike Co. 4 Pick. 130.
The action of assumpsit lies when a party claims damages for breach of simple contract; that is, a promise not under seal. “ It is a remedy by which a compensation in damages may be recovered commensurate with the injury sustained by the breach or violation of any contract, not under seal or of record, whether express or implied, written or verbal, for the payment of money, or'for the performance or omission of any other act.” 2 Petersd. Abr. 414. The question here presented came before the Supreme Court of Vermont, in Woods v. Pettes, 4 Verm. 556, in which case it was held that assumpsit would not lie to recover a sum found due by the commissioners appointed to examine and adjust the claims against an insolvent estate, but that debt was the proper form of action.
This suit is not maintainable and a nonsuit must be entered.

Plaintiff nonsuit.