Court Opinion

ID: 3172907
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-28 06:11:44.647545+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:22.822601
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-84,388-01

                   EX PARTE ERNEST WELTON BELLOTTE, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
           CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-95-952572-A IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child by contact and sentenced to seventeen years’ imprisonment.

       Applicant alleges, among other things, that his parole was revoked without notice of a

hearing and without the opportunity to present witnesses. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true,

might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Williams, 738 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
                                                                                                        2

       The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d), in

that it may order the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and/or the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Institutional Division to file an affidavit listing Applicant’s sentence begin date, the dates

upon which Applicant was released to any period of parole or mandatory supervision, and the dates

of the issuance of any revocation warrants leading to the revocation of such parole or mandatory

supervision. The affidavit should also state whether Applicant was afforded a parole revocation

hearing, and if not, why not.

       The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant received a parole revocation

hearing prior to the revocation of his parole, and if not, why not. The trial court shall also make any

other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition

of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the

order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: January 27, 2016
Do not publish