Court Opinion

ID: 3830630
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:01:56.113039+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:24.791002
License: Public Domain

The proceeding in error in this case is prosecuted by petition in error and case-made. May 23, 1912, counsel for defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the same for the reason, among others, that the case-made fails to show that any notice was either served or waived of the time and place of settling the case-made, and that it did not show that the defendant was present at the time same was settled, or that he suggested amendments thereto, or had the opportunity to do so. An inspection of the record shows that it supports the claims made, and under the law there is no alternative but to sustain the motion.
Under this condition of the record, the case-made must be treated as a nullity, and the cause dismissed. First Nat. Bankof Collinsville v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 P. 748; SchoolDist. No. 18, Creek County, v. Griffith et al., 33 Okla. 625,127 P. 258; Flathers v. Flathers, 35 Okla. 342, 130 P. 134;Phillips v. Koogler, 35 Okla. 438, 130 P. 137; Jones v.Jones, 35 Okla. 453, 130 P. 139; Pain et al. v. Wylie et al.,35 Okla. 467, 131 P. 172; Moore v. Howard Merc. Co.,40 Okla. 491, 139 P. 524.
Numerous other grounds are set forth in the motion to dismiss, some, if not all, of which should be sustained. However, it is unnecessary to prolong this opinion by setting them forth.
The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 807