Court Opinion

ID: 7530855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:10:39.121433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:42.485860
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.
Shaw’s attorney filed an Anders brief.1 Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). -•