Court Opinion

ID: 2803190
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-23 05:04:08.385043+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:17.459653
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 15-203V
                                       Filed: April 27, 2015
                                       Not for Publication

*************************
PEGGY LAFON                                        *
                                                   *
                                                   *
                         Petitioner,               *        Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
                                                   *        Trivalent Influenza Vaccine
v.                                                 *        (“flu”); Shoulder Injury Related to
                                                   *        Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”);
                                                   *        Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                                *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                                *
                                                   *
             Respondent.                           *
*************************

Joseph Pepper, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

         On March 2, 2015, Peggy Lafon filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a trivalent influenza
(“flu”) vaccination on October 9, 2013, petitioner suffered a “shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration.” Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

       On April 27, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”],
in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be
posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act
of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501
note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
Respondent’s Report at 3. Specifically, respondent states that she “believes that
petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”)” and that “petitioner met the statutory requirements by
suffering the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” “Therefore,”
respondent concluded, “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all
legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.

       In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that
petitioner is entitled to compensation.

                                  s/Denise K. Vowell
                                  Denise K. Vowell
                                  Chief Special Master