Court Opinion

ID: 1286088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:21:16.477995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:02.960568
License: Public Domain

680 S.E.2d 204 (2009)
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jean Claude RINEHART.
No. 166P09.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 17, 2009.
Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rinehart.
Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 673 S.E.2d 769.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th day of April 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of June 2009."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of April 2009 by Defendant in *205 this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of June 2009."