Court Opinion

ID: 9757883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 23:02:57.794436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:45.196564
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen:
Four of the seven members of this Court, including myself, are convinced that Arlen Specter is subject to the provisions of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter and that, as a matter of law, he may not be a candidate for Mayor because he has refused to resign as District Attorney.
The Chief Justice, who shares this view, is reluctant to direct that Mr. Specter’s name be stricken from the ballot as a candidate because he feels that previous decisions of this Court misled Mr. ■ Specter. With this I cannot agree. Mr. Specter is no babe-in-the-woods. It was his own conscious attempts to evade the clear provisions of the Charter that gave rise to the unfortunate situation now existing.
*499Assuming, however, that Mr. Specter was misled in the past, as the Chief Justice believes, he cannot possibly be confused any longer. The law is now clearly defined. Hence, Mr. Specter, who is not above the law, should either withdraw as a candidate or resign as District Attorney. The choice is his. In order to avoid all possible inequities, however, I personally would give him a reasonable time in which to choose.