Court Opinion

ID: 5696064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 15:33:54.753508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:01.523925
License: Public Domain

Peck, P. J.
(dissenting). I hesitate to say that a complaint, which seems to be understandable to my brethren, is unintelligible to me, but I must confess that to be the fact in this case. At least I can agree with Justice Botein that “Nowhere are there any allegations of ultimate fact that would sustain a finding that the contract was a device to avoid the usury law. Only conclusions to that effect are pleaded.”
1 vote to dismiss the complaint as insufficient, with leave to replead.
Breitel, Prank and Valente, JJ., concur in decision; Peek, P. J., dissents and votes to dismiss with leave to replead in opinion; Botein, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss in opinion.
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.