Court Opinion

ID: 991307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:34:51.203424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:47.182902
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONALD JOSEPH PLUNKETT,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
94-353-DKC)

Submitted:   January 9, 1997              Decided:   January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Joseph Plunkett, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Brooke Farquhar,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-

tion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Plunkett, No. CR-94-353-DKC (D. Md. June 20, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2