Court Opinion

ID: 609882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:25:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:46.184668
License: Public Domain

996 F.2d 1211
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Francis D. KONWERSKI, Petitioner-Appellant,v.VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;  Attorney General of theCommonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-7341.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  April 14, 1993.Decided:  June 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  James R. Spencer, District Judge.  (CA-91-202-R)
Francis D. Konwerski, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Francis D. Konwerski seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Konwerski v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-91-202-R (E.D. Va.  Oct. 31, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED