Court Opinion

ID: 4436525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-09 14:02:41.683934+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:49.857912
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                          No. 1D19-2463
                  _____________________________

W. TODD SCHWEIZER,

    Petitioner,

    v.

MELANIE SCHWEIZER,

    Respondent.
                  _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

                        September 9, 2019

PER CURIAM.

     The order under review does not preclude Petitioner from
responding to a motion for contempt and sanctions, nor does it
preclude a future hearing on sanctions and determination of
contempt. No ruling has yet been made on contempt or sanctions,
and Petitioner will have avenues of review for any future orders on
contempt or sanctions. Therefore, Petitioner has not demonstrated
irreparable harm, and we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari
for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v.
Everest Financial, Inc., 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
(explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable
harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be
dismissed).
B.L. THOMAS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Ross A. Keene of Ross Keene Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Michael T. Webster of Michael T. Webster, P.A., Shalimar, for
Respondent.

                                2