Court Opinion

ID: 1000127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:35:31.750918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:14.539849
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-2170

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

SPRINT PCS,

                                             Defendant - Appellee.

                            No. 99-2171

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

AMERICA ONLINE,

                                             Defendant - Appellee.

                            No. 99-2172

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,
          and

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, SR.,

                                                       Plaintiff,

          versus

BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION,

                                           Defendant - Appellee.

                             No. 99-2173

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND,

                                           Defendant - Appellee.

                             No. 99-2174

WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

ROSEMARIE RICHARDSON,

                                           Defendant - Appellee.

                                   2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-7-3, CA-99-27-3, CA-99-30-3, CA-99-51-3, CA-
99-52-3)

Submitted:   October 12, 1999           Decided:   October 26, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.     Reid Broughton,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

                                3
PER CURIAM:

      William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing his five actions for failure to state a claim or

meet jurisdictional requirements. We have reviewed the records and

the   district   court’s   opinions   and   find   no   reversible   error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Richardson v. Sprint PCS, No. CA-99-7-3; Richardson v. America

Online, No. CA-99-27-3; Richardson v. Bell Atlantic Corp., No. CA-

99-30-3; Richardson v. First Nat’l Bank of Md., No. CA-99-51-3; and

Richardson v. Richardson, No. CA-99-52-3 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 17,

1999).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED

                                      4