Court Opinion

ID: 9831377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:02:04.337826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:28.925903
License: Public Domain

On Motion of Appellants for a Rehearing.
[8] After considering the record further in the light of the motion, the members of this court all agree that it should not be held that the refused special charge which, had it been given, would have instructed the jury to find against appellee’s plea setting up the statute of limitations, if they believed that in 1915 he told appellant Mrs. Collins he did not claim the land as against her and other heirs of her father, was an incorrect one, and hence that it was reversible error to refuse it. Therefore the judgment heretofore rendered affirming the judgment of the trial court will be set aside, and the judgment of that court will be reversed and the cause will be remanded for a new trial.