Court Opinion

ID: 8480466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:33:11.194677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.952583
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sidney Derrod Evans appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Evans, No. 2:02-cr-00225-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. filed Mar. 26, 2010 & entered Mar. 29, 2010); see also Dillon v. United States, -U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.