Court Opinion

ID: 3179096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-19 21:14:52.794992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:12.283211
License: Public Domain

OR\G\NAl
              Jfn tbe ~niteb         ~tates ~ourt          of jfeberal ~!aims
                          Nos. 15-1528T and 15-1554T (Consolidated)

                                      (Filed: February 19, 2016)
                                     (NOT TO BE REPORTED)

 **********************************
                                                )
 ELIJAH JACKSON, JR.,                           )
                                                )
                        Plaintiff,              )
                                                )
                                                                                    FILED
         v.                                     )                                 FEB 1 9 2U1S
                                                )
 UNITED ST ATES,                                )                                U.S. COURT OF ..
                                                )                               FEDEP..;L CLAIMS
                        Defendant.              )
                                                )
 **********************************

        Elijah Jackson, Jr., Sneads, Florida, prose.

       Blaine G. Saito, Trial Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice,
Washington, D.C., for defendant. With him on the brief were Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting
Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, and David I. Pincus, Chief, Court of Federal Claims
Section, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

                                              ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

        Plaintiff Elijah Jackson, an inmate in a Florida state prison, has filed two actions in this
court without paying the court's filing fee. Mr. Jackson has instead applied for a fee waiver
under the informa pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, which permits the court to waive filing
fees for persons who are unable to pay. See Manning v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 679, 681
(2015). When the applicant is a prisoner, special rules apply. Unless a prisoner is in "imminent
danger of serious physical injury," a prisoner may not bring an in forma pauperis civil action or
appeal if he has brought three or more actions or appeals in federal court while incarcerated that
were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This
statutory benchmark is often referred to as "the three-strikes rule." Leaming v. United States,
114 Fed. Cl. 201, 203 (2014).

        The three-strikes rule is potentially applicable to Mr. Jackson because he is currently
incarcerated. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF No. 3. Although he asserts that
the facility in which he is incarcerated may be classified as a mental health facility under Florida
law, Pl. 's Opp'n at 5, ECF No. 8, that assertion has no bearing on his status as a prisoner. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(h) (defining "prisoner" to include "any person incarcerated or detained in any
facility"); see also Gibson v. City ofNew York, 692 F.3d 198, 202 (2d Cir. 2012) (finding that a
person housed in mental health facility was a "prisoner" under Subsection 1915(h)).

        While imprisoned, Mr. Jackson has filed at least five actions or appeals that were
dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim. The pertinent decisions, stated in
chronological order, extend from 2003 to 2015. See Jackson v. Weiss, No. 8:03-cv-2070 (M.D.
Fla. Oct. 6, 2003) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Jackson v. Weiss, No. 8: l 1-cv-646
(M.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2011) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Jackson v. Buss, No. 5: 11-cv-
57 (N.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2011) (dismissal as malicious); Jackson v. Crews, No. 4:13-cv-651 (N.D.
Fla. June 30, 2014) (dismissal as malicious and for failing to state a claim); Jackson v. Payne,
No. 14-13445, slip op. at 2 (11th Cir. Apr. 14, 2015) ("Jackson's appeal of the district court's
dismissal of his § 1983 complaint for abuse of process is frivolous."). Because Mr. Jackson has
accumulated three strikes, and because he does not assert he is in imminent danger of serious
physical injury, the court denies his application to proceed informa pauperis.

        Typically, the court would give an applicant whose motion to proceed informa pauperis
is denied a chance to pay the filing fee. But here, the court dismisses Mr. Jackson's complaints
as frivolous. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court is obligated to dismiss a prisoner's
complaint if it is "frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). Mr. Jackson's complaints, which ostensibly seek tax
refunds, make incomprehensible claims of entitlement to a fantastic sum of money on thoroughly
specious grounds. Accordingly, they must be dismissed pursuant to Section 1915A. See Jones
v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 543, 544-46 (2015).

                                       CONCLUSION

     Plaintiffs application to proceed informa pauperis is DENIED. The complaints are
DISMISSED as frivolous. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in accord with this opinion.

       No costs.

                                               ~
       It is so ORDERED.

                                             Charles F. Lettow
                                             Judge

                                                2