Court Opinion

ID: 2835995
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-02 20:32:01.276003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:33.479520
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued September 11, 2003 

 

 

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-03-00839-CV
____________

IN RE DERRYL RAY WOOD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

	Relator, Derryl Ray Wood, filed a petition for writ of mandamus
complaining that respondent (1) has not ruled on his pro se pretrial motion for speedy
trial in cause number 940473.  We deny relief.
	"Mandamus will not issue where there is a clear and adequate remedy at
law, such as a normal appeal."  Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992). 
The question of whether a defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated is directly
appealable after conviction.  See Zamorano v. State, 84 S.W.3d 643 (Tex. Crim. App.
2002) (conviction reversed on speedy trial grounds).  In Smith v. Gohmert, 962
S.W.2d 590, 592-93 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998), the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
denied mandamus relief, holding that the relator had an adequate remedy at law on
his speedy trial claims.
	Accordingly, we hold that because relator may raise the issue of whether his
right to a speedy trial was violated in a direct appeal in the event of conviction, he is
ineligible for mandamus relief.  The petition is therefore denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Nuchia, and Keyes.
1.    	Respondent is the Honorable Denise Collins, Judge, 208th District Court,
Harris County.