Court Opinion

ID: 9698569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:54:21.313696+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:41.979364
License: Public Domain

WICKERSHAM, Judge,
concurring:
Whereas I join and fully concur in the Opinion by my colleague Judge Spaeth, I feel compelled to make one further observation. The lower court’s interpretation of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act1 was not only unfairly slanted and interpreted to favor Kelley’s mother who happens to be a Pennsylvania resident; but, equally disturbing to me was the concept by the lower court that Kelley’s father who happened to be a Michigan resident was some*225how incompetent to fly into Pennsylvania four times a year and return to his home in Michigan with his daughter Kelley without being accompanied by his former wife. This is an insulting and demeaning infringement upon the rights of the father with not one word of evidence in the record to support it.

. Act of June 30, 1977, P.L. 29, No. 20, § 1 et seq., 11 P.S. § 2301 et seq.