Court Opinion

ID: 8186582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 23:09:07.086847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:40:26.341988
License: Public Domain

Dodge, J.
Sec. 2968, Stats. 1898, contains the provision: “ In no case shall an execution be issued or any proceedings had upon any judgment after twenty years from the time of the rendition thereof.” Sec. 2900, regulating the docket-*210lug of judgments upon transcripts from justices of the peace, provides: “No action can be brought upon the same as a judgment of such [circuit] court, nor execution issued thereon, after the expiration of the period of the lien thereof on real estate provided by section 2902;” viz. ten years from the date of rendition. Appellants’ contention is that because sec. 2968 does not prohibit issue of execution until twenty years, therefore there is conflict between the two sections above referred to, and sec. 2968 should control. The vice in this argument is that no conflict exists. It is entirely consistent with the prohibition of sec. 2968 against issuing execution on cmy judgment after twenty years to provide by sec. 2900 that none shall issue after ten years on judgments transcripted from justice’s court. Sec. 2900 does not take away any right or privilege granted or assured by sec. 2968. That statute is negative, and prohibits rights after twenty years, but does not confer any during that period. The two statutes can perfectly well stand and be enforced together according to their exact words, and therefore they must be. Att'y Gen. ex rel. Taylor v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.