Court Opinion

ID: 4691334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-29 00:00:26.36173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:54.422139
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40774      Document: 00515880803         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/28/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                      May 28, 2021
                                  No. 20-40774
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Javier Garcia-Navarette,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:20-CR-1154-1

   Before Davis, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Garcia-
   Navarette has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Navarette has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40774    Document: 00515880803          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/28/2021

                                  No. 20-40774

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2