Court Opinion

ID: 9830463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:13:42.705759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:24:19.244863
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
At the request of appellee we find the additional conclusions of fact, to wit:
“(1) That, in unloading the second bundle of paper on the occasion in question, plaintiff’s foot was caused to release the trucks by reason of Reams’ swinging his end of said bundle before plaintiff was ready to swing and before it reasonably appeared to Reams that plaintiff was ready to make the swing, and that in so swinging his end of said bundle Reams was guilty of negligence which caused or concurred in causing plaintiff’s injury.
“(2) That the witness Reams, in the warehouse where the freight was being handled, had the power to select the method and to direct plaintiff in the manner in which the truck should be unloaded. 4
“(3) That Reams was negligent in directing the bundles of paper to be unloaded in the manner in which he directed said work to be done.”