Court Opinion

ID: 4091982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-24 07:24:42.109855+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:13:00.805054
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                  No. 06-16-00089-CR

          SCOTT EVERETT SHINE, Appellant

                           V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

          On Appeal from the 8th District Court
               Franklin County, Texas
                Trial Court No. F-9064

      Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
        Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
           Scott Everett Shine appeals from three convictions of engaging in organized criminal

activity with the underlying offense of delivery of a controlled substance. Shine has filed a single

brief in which he raises an issue common to each of his appeals. 1 He argues that the trial court

erred in limiting his cross-examination of one of the State’s law enforcement witnesses.

           We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Shine’s appeal in cause

number 06-16-00088-CR. For the reasons stated there, we likewise conclude that error has not

been shown in this case.

           We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                                             Ralph K. Burgess
                                                             Justice

Date Submitted:             September 22, 2016
Date Decided:               October 18, 2016

Do Not Publish

1
    Shine likewise appeals from his convictions in cause numbers 06-16-00088-CR and 06-16-00090-CR.

                                                        2