Court Opinion

ID: 3324385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:41:54.701796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:33.209622
License: Public Domain

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT
The historical facts of the case are well known to the parties and need not be reiterated here. It is apparent to the court that each party assigns to the other the reasons for the delay in moving this case toward trial.
The court is reluctant to deny the defendant the opportunity to litigate his case in spite of his excuse that the delay in pleading was the result of an ongoing, mutual desire to reach a settlement.
As was the conclusion reached by the court in ArdmareConstruction Co. v. United American Guaranty, Et Al, 1995 WL 611737 (Oct. 10, 1995; Silbert, J.), this court has concluded that the interests of justice are best served by granting the motion to set aside the default. An order vacating the default for failure to appear will enter upon the payment by the defendant of the reasonable legal fees and costs incurred by the CT Page 8389 plaintiff as a result of its need to file various motions in order to obtain responsive pleadings by the defendant as well as for all proceedings relating to the defendant s efforts to open the default. The default will open upon the filing in court by the plaintiff of a written document acknowledging such payment.
Barry, J.