Court Opinion

ID: 9396902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-23 21:00:54.016803+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:19.596925
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1189     Doc: 6         Filed: 05/22/2023    Pg: 1 of 3

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-1870

        HESMAN TALL,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        COMMISSIONER OF THE HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

                                              No. 23-1189

        HESMAN TALL,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        COMMISSIONER OF HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
        George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:21-cv-02123-GJH)

        Submitted: May 18, 2023                                            Decided: May 22, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1189      Doc: 6        Filed: 05/22/2023     Pg: 2 of 3

        Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia G. Peltzman, Senior Assistant County Solicitor,
        HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1189      Doc: 6        Filed: 05/22/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to

        dismiss, initially giving Tall the opportunity to file an amended complaint, and

        subsequently dismissing the complaint with prejudice after Tall failed to file an amended

        complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

        affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. Comm’r of the Howard Cnty.

        Hous. Auth., No. 8:21-cv-02123-GJH (D. Md. July 15, 2022; filed Jan. 31 & entered Feb. 1,

        2023). We deny Tall’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the

        facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    3