Court Opinion

ID: 4385084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-08 19:00:19.831573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:38.020387
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-2364

NAZIRA URREGO,

                    Plaintiff - Appellant,

             v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,

                    Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00211-REP)

Submitted: April 4, 2019                                          Decided: April 8, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nazira Urrego, Appellant Pro Se. Adrien Coulder Pickard, Andrew Michael Williamson,
BLANK ROME LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Nazira Urrego appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. * On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in

the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Urrego’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction, Urrego

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d

170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth

Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                 AFFIRMED

       *
       See D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co.,
263 U.S. 413 (1923).

                                              2