Court Opinion

ID: 3892687
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:23:18.260255+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:29.406444
License: Public Domain

The defendant had given an obligation to make Clark a deed in fee-simple to 640 acres of land, his choice out of 2000 acres on the waters of Stone's River, to join some corner of the tract.
The bond was given about twenty years ago, and the title was to be made so soon as grants should issue. It did not appear that the defendant had any such land on the waters of Stone's River. The only question was as to the measure of damages, whether it should be the value of the land at the time the bond was given, when grants were obtained, or at this time.
The jury found a special verdict. That neither at the time of the contract, when grants issued, nor at any time since, has the defendant had such land as the bond calls for. That such land at the time the bond was given, and when grants should have issued, was worth, with the interest thereupon, $340, and at this time, $1,040.
The jury have found that the defendant had not the land he contracted to convey, — in contemplation of law, it was therefore a fraud. If the defendant had such land as he has attempted to prove (though he had not a legal title to it) if he offered to show land to which he was entitled by contract for locating, — by showing this he may perhaps have relief in equity; but it having been found by *Page 465 
the jury that he had no title, there must be judgment for the value of the land as it was estimated at this time.1
1 See 2 Hayw. 334, 336, 366; 3 Cr. 300; 1 Johns. 223; 2 Burr. 1110; Bull. N. P. 132; 2 Call, 95; 3 Caines, 221; 4 Mass. 109; Hardin, 41; Add. 23; 4 Dall. xx. v.; 3 Call, 326.