Court Opinion

ID: 4247577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-22 21:15:59.418882+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:40.322858
License: Public Domain

Filed 2/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 40

Ibrahim Hassan Nur, 		Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, 		Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170349

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Tracy E. Hines (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Tristan J. Van de Streek (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

Nur v. State

No. 20170349

Per Curiam.

[¶1]	
Ibrahim Hassan Nur appeals from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief.
 
 Nur argues he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel.  The district court did not err in summarily denying Nur’s application for post-conviction relief for misuse of process on the issue of his waiver to the right to counsel.  Also, the district court did not err in denying Nur’s application for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).

[¶2]	Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte