Court Opinion

ID: 6072505
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 17:15:27.607438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:58.004156
License: Public Domain

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Coming, J.). We add only that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that further discovery would disclose evidence that would affect the parties’ rights and duties under the group health insurance contract (see, Dano v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 89 AD2d 817, 818, affd 59 NY2d 827; see also, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Corning, J.— Discovery.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.