Court Opinion

ID: 4961930
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 15:12:27.510283+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:52.274118
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it ignored Petitioner’s contractual right to subrogation and treated this as a case of equitable subro-gation?
2. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it relied on precedent under the Worker’s Compensation Act to arrive at its conclusion that Petitioner was required to pursue its subro-gation rights diligently?