Court Opinion

ID: 7498744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:21:02.249685+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:14.244385
License: Public Domain

DANAHY, Judge,
concurring specially.
I agree with the result reached in this case, which is consistent with our recent decision in Fouts v. State, 374 So.2d 22, No. 78-1741 (Fla.2d DCA, 1979). However, I do not agree with the implication that disclosure of the nature of the charges pending against a defendant at the time of an alleged escape may not always be prejudicial. No such qualification was expressed in Fouts v. State, supra, and, in my view, no such qualification should be implied here.