Court Opinion

ID: 6747745
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:00:33.628595+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:08.606911
License: Public Domain

OPINION
BY THE COURT:
We have heretofore determined that the subject matter set up in plaintiff’s second amended petition is not stare decisis by reason of the judgments in State ex Foster v Miller et, 136 Oh St 295, and 137 Oh St 503.
We are satisfied that these judgments do not constitute res adjudicata. Moore v Dunn, 41 Oh St 62. Davis v Arnett (2 Syl.) 25 Abs 402.
GEIGER, PJ., BARNES & HORNBECK, JJ., concur.