Court Opinion

ID: 839963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 21:54:16.880438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:45.961944
License: Public Domain

746 N.W.2d 302 (2008)
In re William KYLE, Minor.
Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Robin H. Kyle and Lisa Kyle, Respondents-Appellants.
Docket No. 135465. COA No. 271320.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 4, 2008.
On the order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court  Family Division for a trial on the petition pursuant to MCR 3.972 and MCL 712A.17. The circuit court is permitted to conduct a "preliminary inquiry" off the record "[w]hen a petition is not accompanied by a request for placement of the child and the child is not in temporary custody." MCR 3.962(A). The permissible actions following a preliminary inquiry are limited to granting or denying authorization to file the petition, or referring the matter to "alternative services." See MCR 3.962(B)(1)-(3). Granting permission to file the petition is merely a determination that the petition is sufficient to be "delivered to, and accepted by, the clerk of the court." See MCR 3.903(A)(20) (defining "Petition authorized to be filed") and MCR 3.903(A)(9) (defining when a petition is deemed "filed"). Referring the matter to "alternative services" does not include granting the only relief sought by the petition. Although the Court of Appeals was aware that a medical examination "was the sole focus, of the petition and the only demand sought by petitioner," it concluded that the circuit court was in "compliance" with MCR 3.962(B)(2) and (3) when it ordered the medical examination without a trial on the petition. The Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the preliminary inquiry procedure provided authority for granting the relief sought by the petition without a trial pursuant to MCR 3.972 and MCL 712A.17. Accordingly, we REVERSE the judgment of Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court  Family Division for further proceedings consistent with this order.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.