Court Opinion

ID: 9889770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-11 16:00:56.56243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.161649
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 22-3147
                       ___________________________

              Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., also known as Negro Garey,

                      lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

 Rhonda Langley, RN, FCC; Rosemary Stiles, Physicians Asst, FCCC; P. Benson,
  CO, FCCC; Stacey Hill, Medical Technician, FCCC (originally named as Hill);
  Quinton White, Officer; FCCC (originally named as Q White); J. Lambert, CO,
FCCC; Breanna Lonero, Lt, FCCC (Originally named as Lonero); Michael Kruger,
AHSA, FCCC (originally named as Krueger); Aaron Ward, CO, FCCC (Originally
  named as Ward); Jeremy Lindley, CO, FCCC (originally named as J Lindley);
    Gene Beasley, Warden, FCCC; Joseph Peeler, Correctional Officer, FCCC
  (originally named as Peeler); United States of America; D. Riggs, CO, FCCC;
  Larry Miller, CO, FCCC (originally named as L Miller); Clifford Nichols, CO,
     FCCC (Originally named as John Doe; previously named as C Nichols),

                    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.
                                     ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta
                                 ____________

                          Submitted: October 5, 2023
                           Filed: October 11, 2023
                                [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________
PER CURIAM.

      Eddie Garey appeals a judgment against him on claims under the Federal Tort
Claims Act (FTCA), the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On careful review,
we conclude that the district court1 did not err in granting partial summary judgment
in favor of the defendants. The court also did not abuse its discretion in denying
Garey’s motions for appointment of counsel and for sanctions, or in awarding
damages on the FTCA negligence claim decided in Garey’s favor. We also see no
abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Garey’s post-judgment motion
under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b). The judgment is affirmed.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Garey’s pending motions are denied.
                       ______________________________

      1
        The Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                          -2-