Court Opinion

ID: 3112668
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 07:07:56.062299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:21.078685
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-10-0276-CV

                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                    AT AMARILLO

                                       PANEL A

                                NOVEMBER 23, 2010

                         ______________________________

              TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, APPELLANT

                                          V.

                      JAKE DEEWAYNE HINDMAN, APPELLEE

                       _________________________________

           FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF PARKER COUNTY;

             NO. CIV-10-0203; HONORABLE JERRY BUCKNER, JUDGE

                        _______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

      The Texas Department of Public Safety perfected this appeal from the trial

court's order reversing the decision of the State Office of Administrative Hearings to

suspend the driver's license of Appellee, Jake Deewayne Hindman. The trial court's

order was based on the Department's failure to prove that breath test results were valid

and accurate. After the Department's appellate brief was filed challenging the decision

of the trial court in reweighing the evidence and reversing the administrative decision,
both parties filed a Joint Motion for Entry of an Agreed Order. By that motion, which is

signed by Hindman and counsel for both parties, the parties agree that the legal issue,

the sufficiency of the Breath Test Supervisor's Affidavit, has been resolved in favor of

the Department. In other words, Hindman concedes error in the trial court's decision

and agrees with the Department that the trial court's order should be reversed so that

his driver's license suspension may go into effect.

      Accordingly, we grant the parties' motion and reverse the trial court's order which

had reinstated Hindman's driving privileges and instead render judgment in accordance

with the State Office of Administrative Hearings' decision to suspend Hindman's driver's

license. Per agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring them.

                                                Patrick A. Pirtle
                                                    Justice

                                            2