Court Opinion

ID: 9698176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 19:44:05.014566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:20:39.148803
License: Public Domain

Roberts, C. J.,
concurring. I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority, but I am compelled myself to conclude with reluctance that the effect of this decision is to overrule Bishop v. Langlois, 106 R. I. 56, 256 A.2d 20, in which we denied retrospective operation of the rule stated in Cole v. Langlois, 99 R. I. 138, 206 A.2d 216.
*540Strauss, Factor, Chernick & Hillman, William C. Hill-man, for petitioner.
Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.
Motion to reargue denied.