Court Opinion

ID: 7028082
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 05:53:14.933002+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:10:51.087284
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM2
Melvin Vernell Johnson petitions pro se for review of his 1990 conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute drugs (21 U.S.C. § 846), one count of distribution of in excess of fifty grams of cocaine base (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)), and thirteen counts of money structuring (18 U.S.C. § 5324).
Johnson asserts that the district court committed jurisdictional error when it convicted and sentenced him for cocaine base/ crack cocaine where the substance has not been scheduled or controlled under 21 U.S.C. §§ 811 or 812 at the time of Johnson’s indictment.
The government asserts that a direct appeal is untimely and that there is no basis to interpret this claim as an action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We agree. See Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A) (criminal defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed in district court within ten days of entry of judgment); United States v. Valdez, 195 F.3d 544, 546 (9th Cir.1999) (applying AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations to § 2255 motion). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this petition.
DENIED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.