Court Opinion

ID: 2732002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-11 07:11:38.155323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:20.860056
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00408-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

ONE (1) 2005 CHRYSLER 300, VIN #2C3JA63H110940,                               Appellant,

                                            v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 105th District Court
                   of Kenedy County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Dolores Reyes, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered against her

in favor of appellee, The State of Texas. On August 13, 2014, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August

12, 2014, and that the district clerk, Veronica Vela, had notified this Court that appellant

failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court
notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could

be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).           Appellant was advised that, if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       On August 13, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was

delinquent in remitting a $195.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that

the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the

date of receipt of this court’s letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices and has failed to pay the

filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                    PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
11th day of September, 2014.

                                               2