Court Opinion

ID: 1087070
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-25 18:37:04.17129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:16.100826
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 13-7026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                      Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

DAVID CARL THOMPSON, JR.,

                      Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.   N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1)

Submitted:   October 22, 2013             Decided:   October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Carl Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            David Carl Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.                We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.             Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.               United

States v. Thompson, No. 1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. June 10,

2013).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions   are   adequately   presented    in   the   materials

before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                    AFFIRMED

                                    2