Court Opinion

ID: 5235036
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 17:06:58.290454+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:43.023191
License: Public Domain

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff made out a prima facie ease under the Federal Safety Appliance Act and the Federal Employers’ Liability Aet.† Kate M. 0’Neill, Respondent, v. John A. Dicks, Appellant.—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.

 See 37 U. S. Stat. at Large, 531, chap. 196; 29 id. 85, chap. 87; 32 id. 943, chap. 976; 35 id. 470, chap. 225; 36 id. 298, chap. 160; 36 id. 913, chap. 103; 35 id. 65, chap. 149, asamd. by 36 id. 291, chap. 143.—[Rep.