Court Opinion

ID: 9408362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-12 16:01:15.516144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:43.478227
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-12317    Document: 35-1     Date Filed: 07/12/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-12317
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       DEANDRE MITCHELL GABRIEL,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                    D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-20324-JEM-4
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12317     Document: 35-1      Date Filed: 07/12/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                22-12317

       Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Adam Goodman, appointed counsel for Deandre Gabriel in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
       v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
       entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
       of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
       entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gabriel’s conviction and sentence
       are AFFIRMED.