Court Opinion

ID: 4271503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-01 18:00:23.790367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:44:52.544894
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-40965      Document: 00514453355         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/01/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 17-40965                             FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                        May 1, 2018
                                                                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE SERRANO-CADENA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:17-CR-532-1

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe
Serrano-Cadena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Serrano-Cadena has filed a response.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-40965   Document: 00514453355    Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/01/2018

                               No. 17-40965

     We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Serrano-Cadena’s response.     We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                     2