Court Opinion

ID: 656341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.423908
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 816
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charles M. BERNADOU, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James N. ROLLINS, Warden;  H. E. Rogers, ClassificationSupervisor;  Marvin Robbins, Executive Director;William Purnell, Major, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6137.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  August 25, 1993.Decided:  October 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-1373-H)
Charles M. Bernadou, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Charles M. Bernadou appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Bernadou v. Rollins, No. CA-91-1373-H (D. Md. Jan. 14, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*
 Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in this appeal, we deny Bernadou's motion for appointment of counsel