Court Opinion

ID: 9504174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 19:55:48.916078+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:53.914129
License: Public Domain

Weaver, J.
(dissenting in part). I dissent from the majority’s decision to deny rehearing. I previously joined Justice Kelly in her concurrence/dissent to the majority’s affirmance of the Court of Appeals decision regarding the appropriate statute of limitations. People v Monaco, 474 Mich 48 (2006). I dissented from section IV and the conclusion of the majority opinion because I believed that the Court of Appeals was correct when it found that felony nonsupport is a continuing violation. Consequently, I would have affirmed the conclusions of the Court of Appeals. For these same reasons, I would grant the Attorney General’s motion for rehearing.