Court Opinion

ID: 6950039
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:30:22.794106+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:08:03.094460
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.894. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence, that the trial court committed plain error in admitting into evidence a laboratory report, and that the court erred in entering a conviction because there was no written waiver of her right to a trial by jury. We reject without discussion defendant’s argument that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. The state concedes that the record does not contain a valid waiver of jury trial and that the error requires reversal of defendant’s conviction. We agree that the lack of a written jury waiver constitutes reversible error. See generally State v. Taxon, 142 Or App 484, 920 P2d 567 (1996). In light of our conclusion that defendant’s conviction must be reversed, we need not reach her assignment of error concerning the admission of the laboratory report.
Reversed and remanded.