Court Opinion

ID: 4124984
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-10 02:12:02.725598+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:38.110533
License: Public Domain

KEN PAXTON
                                         ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

                                                 May 3, 2016

Mr. Charles Horton                                         Opinion No. KP-0080
Executive Director
Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists                  Re: Whether the Texas Board of Professional
Post Office Box 13225                                      Geoscientists has implied authority under
Austin, Texas 78711-3225                                   Occupations Code chapter 1002 to accept and
                                                           place limits on the voluntary surrender of a
                                                           license (RQ-0066-KP)

Dear Mr. Horton:

       You request our opinion about the voluntary surrender of an unexpired license issued by
the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists (the "Board"). 1 Specifically you ask:

                (1) Does the .Board's express authority to issue, renew, suspend,
                    revoke, and take other disciplinary action against the Board-
                    issued license, before expiration, include an implied authority to
                    accept the licensee's voluntary termination by surrender of the
                    license before .it expires?

                (2) Does the Board's broad authority to regulate professional
                    geoscience under the Act, as a whole, include the implied
                    authority to accept a licensee's voluntary termination by
                    surrender of a Board-issued license?

                (3) If the answer to both questions 1 and 2 is "no," is the Board
                    authorized by other law to accept the voluntary termination by
                    surrender of a license it issued previously?

                (4) If the Board is authorized to accept the voluntary termination by
                    surrender of a license, must the Board accept a unilateral
                    voluntary surrender of the license by a licensee, or may the
                    Board impose limitations on a licensee's ability to voluntarily
                    and unilaterally terminate a Board-issued license by surrender?
                    For example may the Board adopt rules that would prohibit the

         1
         See Letter from Mr. Charles Horton, Exec. Dir., Tex. Bd. of Prof! Geoscientists, to Honorable Ken Paxton,
Tex. Att'y Gen. at I (Nov. 5, 2015), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs
("Request Letter").
Mr. Charles Horton - Page 2                    (KP-0080)

                    licensee from voluntarily and unilaterally, without Board
                    approval, terminating a license while the licensee is under Board
                    investigation or is the subject of a pending disciplinary action by
                    the Board?

Request Letter at 2. As your first two questions raise the issue of the Board's implied power, we
address them together. See id.

         As an administrative agency of the State, the Board has only those powers expressly given
it by the Legislature or those implied powers that are reasonably necessary to carry out its express
functions or duties. See Tex. Mun. Power Agency v. Pub. Util. Comm 'n of Tex., 253 S.W.3d 184,
192-93 (Tex. 2007). "An agency may not, however, exercise what is effectively a new power, or
a power contradictory to the statute, on the theory that such a power is expedient for administrative
purposes." Pub. Util. Comm'n ofTex. v. City Pub. Serv. Bd. of San Antonio, 53 S.W.3d 310, 316
(Tex. 2001). But an agency will be determined to have that implied power which is necessary to
accomplish its purpose. See id. (acknowledging that the Legislature impliedly intends that an
agency have "whatever powers are reasonably necessary to fulfill its express functions or duties").
When considering the scope of an agency's authority, courts examine the language of the statute
to determine, and give effect to, the Legislature's intent with respect to the agency's implied
powers. Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Bd. ofTex. Dep 't ofTransp., 156 S.W.3d
91, 101 (Tex. App.-Austin 2004, pet. denied). Absent an express grant of power to accept the
unilateral, voluntary termination of a license, we look to the language of chapter 1002 to consider
whether such power is reasonably necessary for the Board to carry out its express functions.

        Chapter 1002 of the Occupations Code provides for the licensing and regulation of
geoscientists. See TEX. Occ. CODE§§ 1002.001-.501 ("Texas Geoscience Practice Act"). Chapter
1002 requires a person who engages in the public practice of geoscience to have a license issued
by the Board. Id. § § 1002.251 (a), .156, .261 (a); see also id. § 1002.252 (listing activities exempted
from license requirement). Under chapter 1002, the Board has express authority to "adopt and
enforce rules consistent with [chapter 1002] and necessary for the performance of its duties." Id.
§ 1002.151. The Board is authorized to set reasonable and necessary fees, including for the
"application, examination, licensure, and renewal of a license." Id. § 1002.152. It shall adopt and
enforce a code of professional conduct. Id. § 1002.153(a)-(b). The Board is mandated to enforce
chapter 1002, including receiving complaints and conducting investigations. See id.
§ 1002.154(a)-(c). Chapter 1002 authorizes the Board to deny a license in certain instances. See
id. § 1002.401. Chapter 1002 also authorizes the Board to establish a license expiration schedule.
See id. § 1002.262. And it authorizes the Board to impose sanctions and to take disciplinary
actions, including the suspension and revocation of a license. See id. §§ 1002.402, .403.

        You point to either the Board's general rulemaking power or its range of enforcement
powers as express powers from which may be implied the power to accept a voluntary surrender
of a license. See Request Letter at 2-3. The Board's rulemaking authority encompasses broadly
that power which is necessary for the Board to perform its regulatory and enforcement duties.
Mr. Charles Horton - Page 3                           (KP-0080)

         See TEX. Occ. CODE § 1002.151. In addition, the Board is expressly authorized to fully
suspend or revoke a license. See id § 1002.403(a)(2)-(3). Chapter 1002 does not have a stated
purpose but considered as a whole, it is apparent that the purpose of the chapter is to protect the
public by ensuring that persons practicing as geoscientists are qualified, perform under a code of
ethics and behavior, and are subject to investigation and discipline for acting in violation of chapter
1002. See supra at 2 (citing TEX. Occ. CODE §§ 1002.152-.154, .401). The Board's express
authority over a license expiration schedule and its authority to terminate a license via suspension
or revocation implicitly include the authority to allow a licensee to terminate his or her own license
by surrendering it. Having the power to accept a voluntary surrender of a license comports with
the purpose of the statute, including the power of revocation, and is reasonably necessary for the
Board to regulate the practice of geoscience. And it does not equate to the exercise of a new power.
See Pub. Util. Comm 'n of Tex., 53 S.W.3d at 316 (recognizing that an administrative agency may
not, by rule, exercise what is effectively a new power for expediency's sake). Accordingly, a court
would likely determine that the powers given the Board to enforce chapter 1002's regulation of
professional geoscientists include the implied authority to accept a unilateral, voluntary surrender
of a license by a licensee. Given this conclusion, we need not address your third question.

        Your fourth question is whether the Board may be required to accept such a voluntary
surrender of a license or whether the Board may impose conditions on its acceptance of a license
surrender. See Request Letter at 2. The Board's acceptance of a voluntary surrender of a license
is not an express power mandated in chapter 1002. See supra at 2. Nor is it a duty imposed by
chapter 1002. Cf TEX. Gov'TCODE § 311.016 ("'Shall' imposes a duty."). Accordingly, chapter
1002 does not require the Board to accept a unilateral, voluntary surrender of a license. A court
would likely conclude that, pursuant to its general rulemaking power, the Board may impose
reasonable conditions on its acceptance of a voluntary license surrender. 2 See TEX. Occ. CODE
§ 1002.151.

         2Though  you refer to potential elements of a rule, you do not provide us the language of any proposed rule.
Thus, we do not opine on any specific rule but advise you only generally that an administrative rule may not impose
additional burdens, conditions, or restrictions that are inconsistent with the statute. Hollywood Calling v. Pub. Util.
Comm 'n, 805 S.W.2d 618, 620 (Tex. App.-Austin 1991, no writ). The determinative factor in deciding whether an
agency has exceeded its rulemaking authority is whether the rule's provisions are in harmony with the statute's
general objectives. Pruett v. Harris Cty. Bail Bond Bd, 249 S.W.3d 447, 452 (Tex. 2008).
Mr. Charles Horton - Page 4                 (KP-0080)

                                     SUMMARY

                      A court would likely determine that the Board of
              Professional Geoscientists has implied authority under chapter 1002
              of the Occupations Code to accept the unilateral, voluntary
              surrender of a license by a licensee. A court would likely also find
              that the Board may impose reasonable conditions on its acceptance
              of a voluntary license surrender.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            KEN PAXTON
                                            Attorney General of Texas

JEFFREY C. MATEER
First Assistant Attorney General

BRANTLEY STARR
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee

CHARLOTTE M. HARPER
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee