Court Opinion

ID: 9588501
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:34:57.076499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:36.763584
License: Public Domain

Clarke, Presiding Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the holding of the majority and I would also affirm because of our pronouncement in Hardison v. Shepard, 246 Ga. 196, 197 (269 SE2d 458) (1980). There we said, “[i]n the context of the present case, it is impossible to determine the nature of the conduct which gave rise to the charge of driving too fast for conditions. ‘It is well established that vagueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in light of the facts of the case at hand.’ United States v. Mazurie, 419 U. S. 544, 550 (95 SC 710, 42 LE2d 706) (1975).”