Court Opinion

ID: 996136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:46:49.18177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.041574
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

TIMOTHY LAVON BUMPASS,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-93-238, CA-97-380-1)

Submitted:   August 13, 1998              Decided:   September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter David Goldberger, LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ELLIS, Ardmore, Penn-
sylvania, for Appellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   United   States   v.   Bumpass,   Nos.   CR-93-238;   CA-97-380-1

(M.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                 DISMISSED

                                     2