Court Opinion

ID: 568232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:36.067932
License: Public Domain

944 F.2d 902
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos Ricardo HILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-6589.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 1, 1991.Decided Sept. 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.   Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.  (CR-83-123-M, CA-87-579)
Carlos Ricardo Hill, appellant pro se.
Maury S. Epner, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Carlos Ricardo Hill appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   United States v. Hill, CR-83-123-M (D.Md. Apr. 30, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.