Court Opinion

ID: 59953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 03:56:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:02.584271
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                 March 5, 2008
                                No. 07-51120
                             Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFRAIN URIAS TORRES, also known as Fernando Lugo

                                           Defendant-Appellant

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Texas
                         USDC No. 3:07-CR-919-ALL

Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Efrain Urias Torres raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.
224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624,
625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). The Government’s

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 07-51120

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.

                                    2