Court Opinion

ID: 9854682
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 06:11:34.746667+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:13.931124
License: Public Domain

HENRIOD, Justice
(concurring).
I concur in the result, but see no reason for discussing the Cobo 1 case. The main opinion in effect says that irrespective of failure to object, the evidence claimed to have been inadmissible was admissible, and any question of failure to obj ect, therefore, is not even pertinent to this case or our decision.

. 90 Utah 89, 60 P.2d 952, 958, where it was said the appellate court could note and consider unobjected to trial court level matters, in “capital offenses or other grave and serious offenses of long * * * imprisonment,” which matters have been injected as a result of “palpable error.”