Court Opinion

ID: 9703437
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 23:56:06.719376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:21:48.897978
License: Public Domain

PELLEGRINI, Judge,
concurring.
I concur only because I believe that the majority should not reach the issue of whether the Slacks were required to file separate and distinct appeals from each of PennDot’s orders suspending the registration of their two vehicles. The majority should not have reached that issue because there is nothing in the record to establish whether PennDot properly raised this issue. PennDot filed no motion to quash the appeal raising this issue, this issue is not addressed in the trial court’s opinion, and, because PennDot chose not to order a transcript of the proceedings before the trial court, we are unable to determine whether PennDot raised the issue in the hearing before the trial court. Consequently, I concur in the result only.