Court Opinion

ID: 9426261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:17:20.295535+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:22:59.874139
License: Public Domain

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in previous opinions by himself1 and by Mr. Justice Black,2 that any federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First Amendment, would grant cer-tiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

 United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123, 130-138 (1973) (dissenting); Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, 491-492 (1966) (dissenting); Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (dissenting).

 Ginzburg v. United States, supra, at 476 (dissenting).