Court Opinion

ID: 9830435
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:12:36.363298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:22.355626
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellees, in their motion for rehearing, call attention to an error in the original opinion in stating the pleadings of appellants, in that it was erroneously stated in said opinion that the said pleadings contained a specific allegation that' the improvements made by appellants on the property in controversy were made with the consent of Jane Johnston. A careful examination of the pleadings discloses that this specific allegation was not made. We are, however, of the opinion that the legal effect of the pleadings of appellant is that such improvements were made both with the knowledge and consent of the said Jane Johnston. .With this correction,, the motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.