Court Opinion

ID: 9752506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 18:11:10.514976+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:27:17.048771
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.:
I dissent from the majority opinion which affirms the court below. I am of the opinion that the court below was not justified in reversing the Liquor Control Board which had revoked the liquor license of the licensees. The board is deprived of essential control over such an establishment. It is significant that the majority opinion states: “While the licensees contend that this witness [Dorothy Kreitzer] was unworthy of belief, the court below, as to the second averment in the citations, was ‘of the opinion that she told the truth.’ We do not propose to detail her revolting testimony.”
In my opinion the court below did act arbitrarily and the board’s action should have been approved.
Hirt, J., joins in this dissent.