Court Opinion

ID: 8439940
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:42:01.406082+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.778680
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Clifton appeals the district court’s order denying Clifton a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.