Court Opinion

ID: 9397643
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-25 19:11:07.001048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:26.599167
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                                     Electronically Filed
                                                     Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                                     CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                     25-MAY-2023
                                                     08:01 AM
                                                     Dkt. 27 ODSLJ
                            NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

                  IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                          OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

              DOUGLAS HIRANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
    KATE McCLORY; SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER; AT&T WIRELESS;
         RANDY COOK; HOLIDAY INN HOTEL; WHITE SANDS HOTEL;
   SAND VILLA HOTEL; COCONUT WAIKIKI HOTEL; OHANA MALIA HOTEL,
                     Defendants-Appellees, and
      JOHN DOES 1-200; JANE ROES 1-100, Defendants-Appellees

          APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                      (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

   ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
       (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)
             Upon review of the record, it appears that self-
represented Plaintiff-Appellant Douglas Hirano appeals from the
Circuit Court of the First Circuit's (circuit court) May 6, 2022
"Order Granting Defendant Sand Villa Hotel's Motion to Dismiss
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)" (5/6/22 Order).
             The court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal because
the circuit court has not entered a final, appealable order or
judgment.     See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016);
Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v.
Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d
1334, 1338 (1994).       Further, the 5/6/22 Order is not
independently appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, the
Forgay1 doctrine, or HRS § 641-1(b).             See Greer v. Baker, 137
Hawai i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (setting forth the

     1
         Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).
  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

requirements for appealability under the collateral-order
doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641-1(b) (specifying
requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal).
          Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
          DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai i, May 25, 2023.

                                      /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
                                      Chief Judge

                                      /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                      Associate Judge

                                      /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan
                                      Associate Judge

                                  2