Court Opinion

ID: 9829242
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:07:19.271363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:42:58.843538
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
On motion of appellants, we find that the tract of 31.2 acres on which J. P. Walker resided did not adjoin the larger tract of 812.25 acres. On the larger tract was an inclosure of about 25 acres on which were situated the improvements on the larger tract. The balance of the larger tract was inclosed in one fence and was occupied, held and enjoyed by J. P. Walker for the purpose of growing crops and grazing cattle. ' Appellants ask that we find that J. P. Walker and his children joined in the execution of certain instruments, effecting the land in controversy, subsequent to the deed by Homer Walker to J. P. Walker. These instruments were merely evidentiary on the issues involved; appellants have not requested us to find that they knew of the existence of these instruments before they abstracted their judgments, and we do not so find.
The motions for rehearing are overruled-