Court Opinion

ID: 9302045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:13:07.964317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:43.179384
License: Public Domain

J. B. McPHEBSON, District Judge.
The parties having agreed upon an estimate of the quantity of distilled spirits that were actually in the bonded warehouse on July 20, 1868, it now appears that the sum paid by the plaintiff upon so much of the spirits as had then been lost by evaporation and leakage was $12,473.65. For this sum, therefore, as principal, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Is he also entitled to interest? Certainly not during the whole period, as I think, because of the long delay in the prosecution of the claim (Redfield v. Iron Co., 110 U. S. 174, 3 Sup. Ct. 570, 28 L. Ed. 109; Same v. Bartels, 139 U. S. 694, 11 Sup. Ct. 683, 35 L. Ed. 310); but I think an allowance is proper from October 28, 1897, the day when this action was begun, and accordingly that sum, namely, $2,347.08, should be added to the principal amount, making a total of $14,-820.73, for which amount the clerk is directed to enter judgment.