Court Opinion

ID: 9665697
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:55:13.861365+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:16.069708
License: Public Domain

TEIGEN, Judge
(concurring specially).
I concur. This case differs from the case in which I concurred specially, entitled Interstate Collection Agency, Inc. v. Kuntz, 181 N.W.2d 234 (N.D.1970), for the reason that the evidence on the question of the amount due is not sufficiently clear to permit us to make this computation. It has been suggested that the trial court is in a much better position to do so as it may obtain clarification of the meaning of a certain stipulation from the attorneys who tried the case without a new trial being granted.