Court Opinion

ID: 1030260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 08:11:40.069979+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:37:47.036955
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 09-7133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-3)

Submitted:    September 29, 2009            Decided:   October 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.   Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying   relief   on   his   motion    for     reduction   of   sentence,   18

U.S.C. § 3582 (2006).         We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.           United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-

00123-F-3   (E.D.N.C.     June   3,    2009).      We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                       2