Court Opinion

ID: 5753929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:03:09.026911+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:21.887383
License: Public Domain

*1302Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit conspiring to introduce drugs into the facility and soliciting others to smuggle drugs into the facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was administratively affirmed with a modified penalty and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored the report, taped telephone conversations and an incoming letter to petitioner comprise substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Werner v Philips, 20 AD3d 711, 711-712 [2005]). Given that the foregoing evidence, without more, was legally sufficient to uphold the determination, the Hearing Officer’s improper reliance upon an outgoing letter from petitioner which was not authorized by a mail watch was harmless (see Matter of Carter v Goord, 266 AD2d 623, 624 [1999]; Matter of Fletcher v Selsky, 199 AD2d 865, 866 [1993], lv denied 83 NY2d 753 [1994]). To the extent not specifically addressed herein, petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and are unavailing.
Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Carpinello, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.