Court Opinion

ID: 2925449
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 21:21:28.85036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:16.317880
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00237-CV

                                    COURT OF APPEALS

                       THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                           CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

                     IN RE BRANDI FRAZIER
____________________________________________________________

                  On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
____________________________________________________________

                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides
                          Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

        Relator, Brandi Frazier, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on

April 3, 2006, asking this Court to compel the respondent, the Honorable Marisela Saldana,

Presiding Judge of the 148th District Court of Nueces County, to vacate a temporary order

signed on December 5, 2007. The Court requested and received a response from the real

party in interest, John Longoria, and one has been filed.2

        1
           See TEX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) ("W hen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so."); TEX . R. A PP . P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

        2
           Pursuant to order, the real party in intere s t ’ s response to the petition for writ of mandamus was
originally due on May 9, 2008. The real party in interest filed a motion or extension of time to file his response
until May 14, 2008, and the same was filed on May 14, 2008. The C o u rt herein GRANTS this motion for
        The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief

sought, and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

                                                         PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered
and filed this 9th day of June, 2008.

extension of time.

                                             2