Court Opinion

ID: 9368431
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 21:06:17.335957+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:08.664946
License: Public Domain

People v Gorton (2023 NY Slip Op 00523)

People v Gorton

2023 NY Slip Op 00523

Decided on February 3, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 3, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ.

47 KA 21-01285

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vMICHAEL G. GORTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

HAYDEN M. DADD, CONFLICT DEFENDER, GENESEO (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
GREGORY J. MCCAFFREY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (JOSHUA J. TONRA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

	Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Jennifer M. Noto, J.), rendered August 12, 2021. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a]) and imposing a determinate term of imprisonment, followed by a period of postrelease supervision. Contrary to defendant's contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We note, however, that the uniform sentence and commitment form erroneously reflects that defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree, and it therefore must be corrected to reflect that defendant was convicted of attempted robbery in the second degree.
Entered: February 3, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court