Court Opinion

ID: 9560225
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:45:31.741495+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:27.154654
License: Public Domain

*25DEITS, J.,
concurring.
With respect to the assignments of error challenging LCDC’s approval of the county’s reliance on the the Forest Practices Act to implement Goal 5, although I agree that 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC, 76 Or App 33, 708 P2d 370 (1985), on reconsideration 77 Or App 599, 714 P2d 279, rev allowed 301 Or 320 (1986), requires the court to conclude that LCDC erred, I do not agree that that case correctly interprets the law.