Court Opinion

ID: 155504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 04:17:55+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:53:51.104667
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Tenth Circuit
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                      OCT 30 1997
                                     TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                                 PATRICK FISHER
                                                                                           Clerk

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

           Plaintiff - Appellee,
                                                                 No. 97-2156
 v.
                                                         (D.C. No. CIV-96-1703-LH)
                                                          (District of New Mexico)
 MICHAEL THOMPSON,

           Defendant - Appellant.

                               ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA, BALDOCK and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

       Appellant Michael Thompson, appearing pro se, seeks leave to appeal an

order of the District Court for the District of New Mexico denying with prejudice

his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. We deny appellant a certificate of appealability because he has failed to

make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(1), and dismiss the appeal.

       *
        The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.
App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except
under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally
disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited
under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
      Thompson pled guilty on March 18, 1994 to possession with intent to

distribute of 42.4 milligrams of LSD in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(C). The district court calculated an offense level of 20 and criminal

history category of VI, after applying downward departures for acceptance of

responsibility and mitigating circumstances and an enhancement for being a

career offender. Appellant was sentenced to seventy-two months from an

applicable guideline range of seventy to eighty-seven months. He now challenges

his sentence on only one ground -- that his original offense level without any

adjustments was miscalculated at level 12 instead of level 10.

      The Drug Quantity Table in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) sets forth the respective

base offense levels for possession of various amounts of drugs. Subsection (14)

establishes an offense level of 12 for possession of “Less than 50 MG of LSD.”

The district court correctly calculated the base offense level in sentencing

appellant for possession of less than one gram of LSD.

      Appellant’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

                                       ENTERED FOR THE COURT

                                       Carlos F. Lucero
                                       Circuit Judge

                                         -2-