Court Opinion

ID: 6319492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-03-02 20:09:37.171328+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:43.537976
License: Public Domain

People v Pugh (2022 NY Slip Op 01326)

People v Pugh

2022 NY Slip Op 01326

Decided on March 2, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 2, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PAUL WOOTEN
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

2018-04343
2018-05331
(Ind. Nos. 7147/15, 6329/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vDavid Pugh, appellant. 

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Patty C. Walton of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), both imposed January 31, 2018, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court