Court Opinion

ID: 9584898
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:53:43.366583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:06:46.605408
License: Public Domain

*777Undercofler, Justice,
dissenting. In my opinion the instant case is controlled by Hyman v. Pruitt, 226 Ga. 625 (176 SE2d 707). I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Gifford-Hill & Co. v. Harrison, 229 Ga. 260 (191 SE2d 85) is not applicable in this case. There the granting of the conditional use permit was not discretionary.
The fact that the conditions may be enforced by the withholding of building permits and occupancy permits applies only after the conditional use has been granted. In the instant case, under the discretionary powers of the commission, the conditional use was denied.