Court Opinion

ID: 7790020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:31:27.384259+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:21.470643
License: Public Domain

KLEIN, J.
The trial court allowed appellant to discharge his court appointed counsel without conducting a hearing under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2). This left appellant to represent himself on charges of delivery of cocaine and resisting arrest without violence, and he was convicted. The state makes no contention that there was an adequate Faretta hearing, but argues that appellant’s familiarity with the criminal justice system and his self-representation at a sentencing in an earlier case demonstrated that he was familiar with self-representation. In this case, however, the defendant was not seeking to represent himself, but on the contrary was asking the court to replace his court appointed counsel, with whom he was not satisfied, with other counsel. There was no waiver of the right to counsel and we must accordingly reverse for a new trial.
HAZOURI, J., and METZGER, ELIZABETH A., Associate Judge, concur.