Court Opinion

ID: 9948717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-07 19:04:23.62629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:47.215598
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                            Electronically Filed
                                            Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                            CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                            07-MAR-2024
                                            08:17 AM
                                            Dkt. 22 ODMR
                         NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

                 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                       OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

                         CENTRAL PACIFIC BANK,
                        Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
       FERDINAND CARREON AYSON and VICTORIA ESPRECION AYSON,
                     Defendants-Appellants, and
            FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK; PENTAGON FEDERAL C.U.;
         CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.; VIVINT SOLAR, INC.;
EWA BY GENTRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER, LLC,
                      Defendants-Appellees, and
      JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20;
        DOE ENTITIES 1-20; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20,
                               Defendants

          APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                      (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

               ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
   (By:    Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)
            Upon consideration of the Second Motion for Order

(Second Motion), filed March 4, 2024, by self-represented

Defendants-Appellants Ferdinand Carreon Ayson and Victoria

Esprecion Ayson (collectively, Aysons), which the court construes

as a motion for reconsideration, the papers in support, and the

record, it appears that the Aysons seek reconsideration of the

court's February 26, 2024 Order Denying Motion for Stay, but the

Aysons fail to demonstrate that the court overlooked or

misapprehended any point of law or fact.     See Hawai i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).
  NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

             Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Motion

is denied.

             DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai i, March 7, 2024.

                                        /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
                                        Presiding Judge

                                        /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
                                        Associate Judge

                                        /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
                                        Associate Judge

                                    2