Court Opinion

ID: 3661088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:12:37.520057+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:07.482220
License: Public Domain

From a judgment of nonsuit the plaintiff appeals.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the per curiam opinion.
Defendant's attorney moves in this Court to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment for the absence of a properly constituted case on appeal.
The stenographer's full notes of the trial in the Superior Court are copied in the record. Immediately following them we find the following entry: "The record, stenographer's notes, the judgment and the exception to the nonsuit shall constitute the case on appeal to the Supreme Court."
This is not signed by either the presiding judge or by the counsel for the plaintiff or defendant. It is repudiated by the counsel for the defendant in this Court, who moves to affirm the judgment for lack of a case on appeal. The motion must be allowed.
There appears to have been no attempt to make out a case on appeal in conformity with the statute. That offered as a case on appeal is neither signed by the judge nor by the counsel.
In this connection we again call the attention of the profession to what has been said on the subject of "Cases on Appeal" in Cressler v. Asheville,138 N.C. 483; Bucken v. R. R., 157 N.C. 444; and in Skipper v. LumberCo., 158 N.C. 322.
In the latter case it is held that: "When the appellant has set out in the case on appeal the transcribed stenographer's notes, he fails to (213) prepare a concise statement of the case as required by Revisal, 591, and his appeal will be dismissed under Rule 22 of the Supreme Court when upon examination no error is found in the record proper."
Appeal dismissed and judgment affirmed.