Court Opinion

ID: 6092138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 19:59:17.754813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:36.283632
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered May 17, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally
*619insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Williams, 247 AD2d 416, 417). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.