Court Opinion

ID: 9363385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-16 00:00:46.401003+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:31.653169
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50382         Document: 00516610471             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/13/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                      ____________                                      Fifth Circuit

                                                                                      FILED
                                       No. 22-50382                            January 13, 2023
                                      ____________
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Frank Medina, Jr.,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 6:21-CR-49-16
                      ______________________________

   Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          Counsel appointed to represent Frank Medina, Jr., on appeal has filed
   a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
   738 (1967). Medina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50382   Document: 00516610471      Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/13/2023

                                 22-50382

   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                     2