Court Opinion

ID: 2689798
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:22:48.912077+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:42.479982
License: Public Domain

[THE STATE EX REL.] ON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL

                      COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

 [Cite as State ex rel. ON Environmental Serv. v. Indus. Comm. (1998), ___ Ohio

                                    St.3d ___.]

Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.

  (No. 97-1613 — Submitted October 27, 1998 — Decided December 30, 1998.)

   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD07-908.

                               __________________

      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.P.A., George H. Rosin and Grant M.

Yoakum, for appellant.

      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald,

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

      Brian & Brian and Richard F. Brian, for appellee Michelle K. Berns.

                               __________________

      The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion

of the court of appeals.

      MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and COOK, JJ., concur.

      RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

                               __________________

      LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the

court of appeals on the basis that the landfill operation does not qualify as

“construction.” Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

      RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.