Court Opinion

ID: 8452146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:54:44.647689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.608909
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Donnie Austin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.