Court Opinion

ID: 1003981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:34:24.417702+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:29.807322
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7590

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WARDEN   MOATS,  M.C.T.C.;  WARDEN  SACCHET,
R.C.T.C.; CORRECTIONAL DEPARTMENT; STATE OF
MARYLAND,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-00-1147-WMN)

Submitted:   March 22, 2001                 Decided:   March 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Guy Lancaster Richmond appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court.   Richmond v. Moats, No. CA-00-1147-WMN (D.

Md. filed Oct. 27, 2000; entered Oct. 31, 2000).   We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2