Court Opinion

ID: 56840
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:57:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:42.829181
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              OCTOBER 2, 2007
                               No. 07-11354                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                         ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 02-00014-CR-CAR-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

BRADFORD G BROWN,

                                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Georgia
                       _________________________

                               (October 2, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Charles Cox, Jr., appointed counsel for Bradford G. Brown in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Brown’s supervised

release and accompanying sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2