Court Opinion

ID: 9557004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 14:00:47.803036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:18.713274
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12312   Document: 5-1     Date Filed: 08/21/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-12312
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      TEDIE ROCHELLE BARROW,
      APRIL LATASHA THOMAS,
      JAWON WYKEEN TY'QUAN THOMAS,
                                                  Plaintiﬀs-Appellants,
      versus
      FLOWERS HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION,
      HEIN N. DAO,
      M.D., Medical Doctor,
      PHILIP T. WILSON,
      D.O., Osteopathic, (Hospitialist),

                                                Defendants-Appellees.
USCA11 Case: 23-12312      Document: 5-1     Date Filed: 08/21/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                       Opinion of the Court                23-12312

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Alabama
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-00220-ECM-SMD
                           ____________________

      Before NEWSOM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. The statutory time limit required Tedie Barrow, April
      Thomas, and Jawon Thomas to file a notice of appeal on or before
      June 12, 2023, which was the first business day after the 30-day pe-
      riod following the entry of final judgment on May 11, 2023.
      28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (7), 26(a)(1)(C).
      However, the plaintiffs did not file their notice of appeal until July
      6, 2023.
              Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
       Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
       ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
       pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
       1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
       appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
       entertain an appeal that is out of time).
             No petition for rehearing may be ﬁled unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.