Court Opinion

ID: 9768789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 13:49:16.834671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:45.371705
License: Public Domain

On Motions for Rehearing.
HUGHES, Justice.
Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, in which she prays that we render judgment for her. Appellees, in their motion, pray that there be an affirmance.
Our judgment reversing and remanding the case, if construed as a general remand on the ground that the evidence was insufficient, cannot stand, because appellant made no assignment of error to such effect. Wisdom v. Smith, 146 Tex. 420, 209 S.W.2d 164.
There can be no mistaking the import of our opinion. Clearly, it was that under *963the undisputed facts and circumstances appellant was the child of George Ann Barrow by adoption by estoppel.
We, therefore grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, set aside our former judgment remanding this case, and here render judgment establishing appellant’s status as a child of George Ann Barrow.
Appellees’ motion for rehearing is overruled.
Appellant’s motion granted — judgment of remand set aside and judgment rendered for appellant. Appellees’ motion overruled.
ARCHER, C. J., not sitting.