Court Opinion

ID: 65493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 05:59:25+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:21.054896
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                    FILED
                        ________________________         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                Aug. 28, 2008
                              No. 07-15534                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                        ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 06-00508-CR-T-23-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

PAUL ANTHONY GRAHAM,
a.k.a. Paul Richard Mays,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                             (August 28, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Mark G. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Paul Anthony Graham, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Graham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2