Court Opinion

ID: 3094927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:25:16.332462+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:51:18.257278
License: Public Domain

Opinion filed December 9,
2010
 
                                                                       In The
                                                                              
  Eleventh
Court of Appeals
                                                                   __________
 
                                                         No. 11-09-00134-CR
                                                    __________
 
                                 JOSHUA LATTIMORE, Appellant
                                                                  
V.
                                        
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 
                                   On
Appeal from the 104th District Court
                                                            Taylor
County, Texas
                                                    Trial
Court Cause No. 16689B
 

 
M
E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Joshua
Lattimore pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping.  After finding that
Lattimore did not voluntarily release the complainant in a safe place, the jury
found him guilty of a first degree felony and assessed his punishment at forty
years confinement and a fine of $10,000.   We affirm.  
I.  Background Facts
Lattimore
and Roger Gore were in the custody of the Texas Youth Commission when they left
a halfway house in San Antonio.  They got a car and drove toward Abilene, where
Gore claimed to have once lived.  The car broke down near Bronte, and they
hitchhiked the rest of the way.  In Abilene, they frequented a mall during the
day, shoplifted food, and spent their nights in an empty apartment to which
they had gained access through a window.  After three or four days, someone
came to show the apartment, and the two ran away.  Gore suggested that they get
a car.  They went to a Wal-Mart, where Gore stole a BB gun.  Lattimore and Gore
then went to the Las Brisas apartment complex.
K.S.
was a student at McMurry University.  She worked nights at Blue Cross Blue
Shield.  At 11:30 p.m. one night, she got off work and drove back to her apartment
in the Las Brisas complex.  As she pulled into the parking lot, she saw two
people walking around but was not concerned.  She got out of her car and was
walking away when she felt as though someone else was there.  She turned around
and saw Gore pointing a gun at her face.  K.S. screamed, and Gore told her to
shut up or he would kill her.  Gore demanded her keys, and she handed Gore her
purse.  Gore found the keys and threw them to Lattimore, who then unlocked the
car.  Gore told K.S. to get in the backseat.  Gore took off his shirt and
covered her head.  He got in the backseat with her and gave Lattimore
directions on where to drive.  Gore then sexually assaulted K.S.
Lattimore
drove down Highway 277.  At gas stations near Bronte and Sonora, Lattimore used
K.S.’s debit card to get money.  Lattimore continually threatened to kill K.S. 
She remained blindfolded and had no idea where they were going.
After
the stop near Sonora, at around 4:00 a.m., Lattimore turned down a country road
off Interstate 10.  He left the country road for a dirt road through a pasture,
driving over two cattle guards and some water.  Lattimore saw some cows and
commented that they should let the cows kill and eat K.S.  When they finally
stopped, Gore pulled K.S. out of the car.  He removed his shirt from her head
and ordered her to start walking and not to turn and look at him or he would
shoot her.  It was still dark, the grass came up to her thighs, and she worried
about rattlesnakes.  She walked through the pasture until she came to the fence
line, at which point she started walking along the fence.  She could see the car’s
taillights on the road.
When
K.S. could no longer see the taillights, she returned to the dirt road.  She made
her way back to the highway and discovered that it was Interstate 10.  Figuring
that Lattimore and Gore were heading east to San Antonio, she crossed over the
interstate and started walking west. She kept on the side of the road because
she was afraid of snakes and other animals.  Although she knew hitchhiking was
dangerous, she attempted to flag down a car for help.  Eventually, an eighteen-wheeler
stopped and gave her a ride to a gas station near Sonora, around forty-five
miles away.  On the way, she used the driver’s cell phone to call her parents. 
When K.S. arrived at the gas station, she told the clerk what had happened, and
the clerk called the police.  Lattimore was arrested in San Antonio.
II.  Issue
            Lattimore
argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a
finding that he did not voluntarily release his victim in a safe place.[1]
III.  Discussion
Aggravated
kidnapping is a first degree felony, punishable by imprisonment for life or a term
of not more than ninety-nine years or less than five years. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.32(a)
(Vernon Supp. 2010), § 20.04(c) (Vernon 2003).   However, if the defendant
proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he voluntarily released the
complainant in a safe place, the offense is reduced to a second degree felony,
punishable by a term of imprisonment of not more than twenty years or less than
two years.  Id. §§ 12.33(a), 20.04(d).
When
reviewing the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support a negative issue for
which the defendant has the burden of proof, we first examine the record for
evidence that supports the negative finding while ignoring all evidence to the
contrary.  Nolan v. State, 102 S.W.3d 231, 238 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th
Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d).  If no evidence supports the negative finding, we
must examine the entire record to determine whether it establishes the contrary
proposition as a matter of law.  Id.  
            To
avail himself of Section 20.04(d), the defendant must show that the release
occurred in a place and manner that realistically conveyed to the complainant
that she was freed from captivity and in circumstances and surroundings where
aid was readily available.  Harrell v. State, 65 S.W.3d 768, 772 (Tex.
App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref’d).  The following factors are useful
in determining whether a release was in a safe place:  (1) the remoteness of
the location, (2) the proximity of authorities or persons who could aid or
assist, (3) the time of day, (4) climatic conditions, (5) the condition of the
victim, (6) the character of the location or surrounding neighborhood, and (7)
the victim’s familiarity with the location or surrounding neighborhood.  Id.
at 772-73.  
Officer
Bryn Thomas Humphrey of the Sonora Police Department testified that the town of
Junction was approximately twelve miles from where K.S. was released by way of
a farm-to-market road.  By interstate, Sonora was about forty-four miles away.
There were very few houses in the area.  Lattimore and Gore released K.S. at
around 4:00 a.m. Even though the moon was out that night, K.S. had difficulty
seeing. Photographs of the area taken by Officer Humphrey were provided to
the jury.  Officer Humphrey testified that the land in which K.S. was released
was rugged and desolate and that it would have been very dark at the time.  Lattimore
himself admitted that the location was desolate, dry, and hot.  Rattlesnakes,
hogs, bobcats, and mountain lions were among the wildlife known to be in the
vicinity.  Officer Humphrey also testified that the stretch of Interstate 10
along which K.S. walked was dangerous. Police had recently found a decapitated
body near where she was dropped off.  In the previous five years, two hitchhikers
had been accidentally killed on the interstate.  K.S. testified that she was
familiar with cattle and with the danger of rattlesnakes and that she was able
to figure out roughly where she was when she got to Interstate 10, but no
evidence was presented that she was familiar with the location in which she was
released.  Although K.S. generally was in good physical condition, she had been
sexually assaulted only a few hours before and, upon her release, was
emotionally distraught and continued to fear for her life.
Ample
evidence supported the jury’s finding that Lattimore did not release K.S. in a
safe place.  See Woods v. State, 301 S.W.3d 327, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (complainant not released in safe place when
released at 4:00 a.m. in a sparsely populated area that had been the site of
criminal activity, with no other people present); Harrell, 65 S.W.3d at
773 (complainant not released in safe place when the area was sparsely
populated, dimly lit, the home of a pack of wild dogs, and the site of numerous
burglaries, two sexual assaults, and two homicides and when the time of release
was early morning in winter); Rodriguez v. State, 766 S.W.2d 360, 361
(Tex. App—Texarkana 1989, pet. ref’d) (complainant who had been sexually
assaulted was not released in a safe place when released during a winter night
on a rural dirt road a few minutes walk from a gas station when it was not
clear she would find aid in the vicinity).  Lattimore’s sole issue is
overruled.    
IV.  Conclusion
The
judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
                                                                              
            
December 9, 2010                                                                   RICK
STRANGE
Do not publish. 
See Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).                                  JUSTICE
Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Strange, J.

[1]The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recently held
that legal sufficiency is the only standard a reviewing court should apply.  Brooks
v. State, No. PD-0210-09, 2010 WL 3894613, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 6,
2010).