Court Opinion

ID: 994978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:30:42.655658+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:22.372710
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-6681

ROBERT WAYNE WRIGHT,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

LIEUTENANT MARTIN; SERGEANT MATHEWS; SERGEANT
GLADMAN; SERGEANT SESSIONS; OFFICER REYNOLDS;
OFFICER HAM, Each individually, and as em-
ployees of the South Carolina Department of
Corrections,
                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-95-2897-0-8BD)

Submitted:   April 29, 1998                  Decided:   May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Wayne Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Martin, No. CA-
95-2897-0-8BD (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2