Court Opinion

ID: 9397991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-27 21:00:46.707561+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:29.541258
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6339      Doc: 21         Filed: 05/26/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6339

        KELVIN TOYO HENRY, a/k/a Kevin Toyo Banks,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        WARDEN OF GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; THE STATE
        OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DETECTIVE SHAWN CUTTING; OFFICER T.
        KELLETT; FACEBOOK; NEWS BROADCAST FOX 21; NEWS
        BROADCAST 7,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:22-cv-04380-RMG)

        Submitted: May 23, 2023                                           Decided: May 26, 2023

        Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Kelvin Toyo Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Alan Shumsky, ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
        SUTCLIFFE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Facebook.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6339      Doc: 21        Filed: 05/26/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Kelvin Toyo Henry appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate

        judge’s recommendation and dismissing Henry’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to

        28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Henry v. Warden, No. 8:22-cv-04380-

        RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2023). We deny Henry’s pending motions. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2