Court Opinion

ID: 2896443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:44:12.220142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:45.382317
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0217-CR

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL B

                                NOVEMBER 13, 2008
                          ______________________________

                    ALLEN ALEXANDER NEWSOME, APPELLANT

                                             V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

                  NO. 54,512-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE
                        _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

                            ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

       Appellant, Allen Alexander Newsome, appeals his conviction for the offense of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and punishment of 75 years confinement in the

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

       After a timely notice of appeal on May 20, 2008, the reporter’s record was filed on

July 11 and the clerk’s record was filed on July 25. Hence, appellant’s brief was due to be

filed on August 25. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.6(a). After no timely brief was filed, this Court
notified appellate counsel that “unless Appellant’s brief was filed with this Court on or

before September 15, 2008, this appeal will be abated and the cause remanded to the trial

court for further proceedings without further notice.”

       Instead of filing a brief, on September 15, appellate counsel filed a First Motion for

Extension of Time to File [Appellant’s] Brief stating that “appellant’s counsel has been

involved in numerous other cases, trials and hearings.” Although this Court granted the

motion for extension, appellate counsel was notified that requests for subsequent

extensions are not granted absent good cause. Further, this Court notified counsel that

the normal press of business is generally not considered good cause. See Curry v.

Clayton, 715 S.W.2d 77, 79 (Tex.App.–Dallas 1986, no writ). Appellant’s brief was due to

be filed on or before September 24.

       On October 3, this Court notified appellate counsel that appellant’s brief in this

cause had not yet been received. This Court notified counsel the brief was due on or

before October 13, 2008, and that the brief was to be accompanied by a Motion to Extend

Time to File Appellant’s Brief. Once again, this Court notified counsel that unless

appellant’s brief was filed as instructed, “this appeal will be abated and the cause

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice.”

       On October 8, appellate counsel filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time to File

Brief requesting until October 24 to file appellant’s brief stating that “appellant’s counsel

has been involved in numerous other cases, trials and hearings.” By letter dated October

9, this Court denied appellant’s second motion for extension to file appellant’s brief and

                                             2
reiterated that the brief was due on October 13. Further, this Court notified counsel that

unless the brief was filed by October 13, the appeal would be abated and remanded to the

trial court. As of this date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

       Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

       1.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

       2.     whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel given the
              attorney’s failure to file a timely brief.

       The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant does want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also

take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of

counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel

shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a

supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included

in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and

                                               3
the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Monday, December 15,

2008.

        It is so ordered.

                                     Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                          4