Court Opinion

ID: 4423888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-08 15:45:38.606131+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:48.189547
License: Public Domain

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Stonner) (2019 NY Slip Op 06120)

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Stonner)

2019 NY Slip Op 06120

Decided on August 8, 2019

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: August 8, 2019

[*1]In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a. 
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Petitioner; JOHN PHILIP STONNER, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2422376)

Calendar Date: July 8, 2019

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for petitioner.
John Philip Stonner, Glens Falls, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
	Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to June 7, 2019, and upon reading petitioner's correspondence in response dated July 2, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2018]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468—a [Squires], 153 AD3d 1511, 1513 [2017]), it is

	ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.