Court Opinion

ID: 9561646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 18:13:32.960049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:05.633555
License: Public Domain

*291ON REHEARING
The petitioner, Bobby Frank Renfro, has petitioned this Court for rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause.
In a supplemental brief, petitioner raised the issue that he was denied his statutory right to a pre-sentence investigation report pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1982, § 982. We agree with petitioner’s contention. In accordance with § 982, the judgment is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated with directions to the District Court of Tulsa County to comply with § 982 and provide petitioner with a pre-sentence investigation.
IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the judgment be affirmed, but the sentence be vacated and this matter remanded to the District Court for resentencing after a pre-sentence investigation has been completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT this 26th day of March, 1987.