Court Opinion

ID: 9934059
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:42:54.899629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:20.192102
License: Public Domain

I agree that dismissal was appropriate. In reaching this conclusion, I do not rely on the existence of an integration clause in the broiler feeding agreements.
The parties to the broiler feeding agreements are Wayne Poultry and the plaintiffs. The integration clause is an expression of the understanding of those parties that that written agreement is complete and is not to be varied by parol evidence. See, Commercial Credit Co. v. Seale, 30 Ala. App. 440,8 So.2d 199 (1942); 4 S. Williston, A Treatise on the Law ofContracts § 633 (3d ed. 1961). I do not believe that the integration clause in the agreement between Wayne Poultry and the plaintiffs in any way indicates whether the agreement between Wayne Poultry and the defendants was intended to directly benefit the plaintiffs. *Page 1230