Court Opinion

ID: 5815158
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 19:37:54.65129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:42:58.628396
License: Public Domain

*656The record contains substantial evidence that supports the determination that the children’s best interests would be served by their removal from petitioner’s home (see Matter of O’Rourke v Kirby, 54 NY2d 8, 16 [1981]). The evidence also supports the finding that petitioner failed to provide one of the boys with his prescribed medication (see Matter of Joshua Noel A., 40 AD3d 749 [2007]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeney, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.