Court Opinion

ID: 9390596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-27 21:00:36.703283+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:35.601365
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1358      Doc: 8         Filed: 04/26/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 23-1358

        In re: SIDDHANTH SHARMA,

                            Petitioner.

        On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
        District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:22-cv-00059-BO)

        Submitted: April 24, 2023                                           Decided: April 26, 2023

        Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Siddhanth Sharma, Petitioner Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1358      Doc: 8         Filed: 04/26/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Siddhanth Sharma petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court

        has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from

        this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay

        in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny Sharma’s

        motion for assignment to a single circuit judge and to expedite. We dispense with oral

        argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

        before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                PETITION DENIED

                                                      2