Court Opinion

ID: 2893599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 22:46:19.74257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:20.064708
License: Public Domain

BRIAN MILLSAP V. SHOW TRUCKS USA, INC.

NO. 07-06-0065-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 8, 2006
______________________________

FRANCISCO MURO, JR.,

			Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 51,418-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING
_______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND
__________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
	Francisco Muro, Jr. (appellant) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled
substance.  His appellate counsel requested, on June 14, 2006, an extension of time to file
the brief, stating that counsel only recently received access to the reporter's record.  The
extension was granted until July 3, 2006.  On July 5, 2006, appellant's counsel requested
a second extension, stating that due to trial schedule and other pending appellate matters,
he had been unable to adequately prepare a brief.  This request was also granted, and the
deadline was extended to July 31, 2006.  However, counsel was also admonished that no
further extensions would be granted.  So too was he told that the failure to comply with this
deadline would result in the abatement and remand of the appeal.  Instead, counsel for
appellant asked that the deadline again be extended until August 31, 2006.  
	Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 108th District Court
of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall
immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to
determine the following:
	1.	whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

	2.  	whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
counsel due to appellate counsel's failure to timely file appellate brief. 
See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83
L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled
to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right
and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
submitting an appellate brief).

	We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
addressing the foregoing subjects.  Should the trial court find that appellant desires to
pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we
further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal.  The
name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,
if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court's findings
of fact and conclusions of law.  Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions
of law and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the
aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's
record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before September 7, 2006.  Should
additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or
before September 7, 2006.
	It is so ordered.
							Per Curiam
Do not publish.