Court Opinion

ID: 6059648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 15:53:56.582337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:51.840253
License: Public Domain

In an action to recover damages *680for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated October 12, 1999, which, upon renewal, granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant who allegedly treated the plaintiff Frederick Nuss at the Nassau County Medical Center (hereinafter the Medical Center). The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to serve a notice of claim as required by General Municipal Law § 50-d (2). The defendant contends that the notice of claim requirement was applicable because the Medical Center is a public institution maintained by the County of Nassau and because he did not receive any compensation from the plaintiff Frederick Nuss (see, General Municipal Law § 50-d).
The defendant demonstrated as a matter of law that he rendered medical services to the plaintiff Frederick Nuss in a public institution maintained in whole or in part by a municipal corporation without receiving compensation from him (see, General Municipal Law § 50-d [1]). Thus, the plaintiffs were required to serve a notice of claim and commence the present action within one year and 90 days from the date the cause of action accrued (see, General Municipal Law §§ 50-d [2]; 50-i). Having failed to do so, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint (see generally, Pedrero v Moreau, 81 NY2d 731, 732; Norr v Spiegler, 56 AD2d 389, 393, affd 44 NY2d 809; Adams v Bobb-McKoy, 245 AD2d 474; cf., Palmer v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 135 AD2d 797; Kral v County of Westchester, 101 AD2d 880; Lium v Ploski, 87 AD2d 860). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.