Court Opinion

ID: 2961639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:45:38.869931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:31.977643
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          December 11, 1992     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 92-1541                                           LEO T. NOONAN, TRUSTEE,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                            RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION,                                        ETC.,                                 Defendant, Appellee.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                    [Hon. Walter Jay Skinner, U.S. District Judge]                                              ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                              Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,                                   Circuit Judges.                                   ______________                                 ___________________               Leo T. Noonan on brief pro se.               _____________               Thomas Paul Gorman, Sherin & Lodgen, Richard T. Aboussie and               __________________  _______________  ___________________          Hugo A. Zia on brief for appellee.          ___________                                  __________________                                 __________________                                Per  Curiam.      Plaintiff  appeals  dismissal  of  his                 ___________            complaint   under  Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  12(b)(1),(6).    In  a            comprehensive  opinion,  the  district  court  held  that the            complaint  failed to state a claim upon which relief could be            granted  in light of the  provisions of 12  U.S.C.   1823(e),            and the doctrine of  D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v.  Federal Deposit                                 ____________________     _______________            Ins. Corp., 315 U.S. 447 (1942).            __________                 Based  on  our  own  reading of  the  record,  and after            consideration of  the parties briefs on appeal, we agree with            the district court's decision to dismiss this complaint under            the  D'Oench doctrine.   Accordingly,  the judgment  below is                 _______            affirmed.             ________