Court Opinion

ID: 993714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:11:50.369994+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:55.165841
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7007

JOHNNIE N. ROWE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,
District Judge. (CA-97-15)

Submitted:   November 20, 1997         Decided:     December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie N. Rowe, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe Delforge, III,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion
for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Rowe v. North Carolina Attorney
Gen., No. CA-97-15 (M.D.N.C. June 23, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2