Court Opinion

ID: 9491913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 14:27:32.60706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:55:00.746912
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Appellees’ Petition For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion. Their statement is attached.
Separate statement filed by WALD and TATEL, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.