Court Opinion

ID: 9369193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-08 01:00:19.371095+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:13.508449
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-50668         Document: 00516638136             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/07/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-50668
                                     Summary Calendar                                 FILED
                                     ____________                               February 7, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                          Clerk

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Veronica Moscoso-Reyes,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Western District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-190-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Veronica Moscoso-Reyes has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Moscoso-Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-50668     Document: 00516638136           Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/07/2023

                                   No. 22-50668

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
          We note, however, that there is a clerical error in the written
   judgment.       The     judgment     lists     the   penalty   provision   as
   “§ 1324(A)(1)(b)(II),” but the provision is § 1324(a)(1)(B)(ii). We therefore
   REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment. See
   Fed. R. Crim P. 36.

                                        2