Court Opinion

ID: 9840506
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-18 20:08:12.751431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:33.875343
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                              EASTERN DISTRICT

GIANNI PIGNETTI AND JENNIFER                    :   Nos. 38 & 39 EAL 2023
PIGNETTI,                                       :
                                                :
                     Petitioners                :   Petition for Allowance of Appeal
                                                :   from the Order of the
                                                :   Commonwealth Court
              v.                                :
                                                :
                                                :
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                   :
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,                   :
                                                :
                     Respondent                 :

                                        ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

      (1)    Did the Commonwealth Court err in disregarding established
             precedent by adding requirements to Eminent Domain Code Section
             705 that are not contained in and are contrary to the clear wording of
             that Section[?]

      (2)    Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the Trial Court’s
             application of Eminent Domain Code Section 705 when
             Condemnees met the clear requirements of that Statute[?]