Court Opinion

ID: 4879602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-27 19:03:29.277609+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:04.303928
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 21-6557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

ADRIAN PAULINO, a/k/a AD, a/k/a Gordo,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00154-AWA-DEM-1)

Submitted: August 24, 2021                                        Decided: August 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Paulino, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Adrian Paulino appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the

record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Paulino’s

motion for compassionate release. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.

2021) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                                AFFIRMED

                                             2