Court Opinion

ID: 9814759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 00:07:10.203897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:44:11.247763
License: Public Domain

HORNBECK, J.
The court in its opinion in this case was in error in assuming that the trial eourt gave special charges Numbers X arzd 2 before argument, and therefore its judgment íespecting such charges was not warranted. However, in view of the fact that the cause was decided upon the principal question of the effect of the claimed waiver of an express provision of the policy the decisiozi respecting the special charges was not determinative and therefore harmless to defendant in ei'ror. The decisiozr will be corrected in accordance with this supplemental opinion and all reference to the special charges may be stricken therefrom.
ALLREAD, PJ, and KUNKLE, J, concur.