Court Opinion

ID: 6500937
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 00:00:25.333572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:35.483561
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-51191      Document: 00516398210         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/18/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                                                                        FILED
                                                                    July 18, 2022
                                  No. 21-51191                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Joseph Rey Campos,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:19-CR-218-1

   Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Rey Campos has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Campos has not filed a response.

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-51191     Document: 00516398210          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/18/2022

                                   No. 21-51191

         We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein. It is dispositive that the Government has declined
   to waive the untimeliness of Campos’s appeal. See United States v. Pesina-
   Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2