Court Opinion

ID: 2172460
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:38.979832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:07.575983
License: Public Domain

292 S.W.3d 605 (2009)
Donald O. CRUMP, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92317.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
September 22, 2009.
Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, James B. Farnsworth, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald O. Crump appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We *606 have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).