Court Opinion

ID: 9956065
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-31 07:16:19.084567+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:08.662190
License: Public Domain

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2024.

                                      In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-24-00131-CR

                    EX PARTE CATHY DENISE FIELDS

                   On Appeal from the 149th District Court
                           Brazoria County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. 88107-CR-A

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

      In this appeal, appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks review of the trial court’s
order signed February 5, 2024 denying her application for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

      Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure sets out “the
procedures for an application for writ of habeas corpus in which the applicant
seeks relief from a felony judgment imposing a penalty other than death.” Tex.
Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 1. The statute lays out a review mechanism
primarily involving both the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and the court in
which the conviction being challenged was obtained. Id. § 3(a)–(b); see also Maye
v. State, 966 S.W.2d 140, 142 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
The statute notes that “[a]fter conviction [its] procedure . . . shall be exclusive and
any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the
prisoner.” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 5.

      This court informed appellant of the jurisdictional problem the statute poses,
and she was granted 21 days to demonstrate this court possesses jurisdiction over
his appeal.    Appellant’s response fails to indicate any basis for this court to
exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want
of jurisdiction.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                          2