Court Opinion

ID: 8431778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 07:43:16.839949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:37.952635
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Mark Weems appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. *269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).
Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.