Court Opinion

ID: 754005
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-18 02:10:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:06.245510
License: Public Domain

142 F.3d 447
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Sergio PIEDRA-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-10399.D.C. No. CR-96-00425.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
.Submitted April 20, 1998.**Decided April 24, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding.
Before BRUNETTI, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Sergio Alfonso Piedra-Castro appeals from the revocation of his supervised release following his conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation subsequent to a felony convicition, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).  Piedro's counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record.  Piedra-Castro has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

3
We have reviewed the record and find that there are no arguable issues for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the district court's judgment is affirmed.

4
AFFIRMED.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3