Court Opinion

ID: 5671364
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 14:13:54.012781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:37.118421
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting smuggling and failure to comply with visiting regulations. The misbehavior report was authored by a correction officer who was surveilling the facility’s noncontact visiting area when he observed petitioner and his visitor crouched down on either side of the door separating the two sides of the noncontact visiting room. The visit was immediately terminated after which a second correction officer searched petitioner’s side of the visiting room where he found a beverage can that contained straw broom bristles tied to lengths of dental floss and a plastic bag. The officer characterized these items as paraphernalia known to be used to transfer contraband under locked doors. The misbehavior report prepared by the correction officer who witnessed the events in question, as well as the other evidence relied on by the Hearing Officer, were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see Matter of Alejandro v Goord, 278 AD2d 731 [2000]). The hearing testimony of petitioner and the telephonic testimony given by his visitor, both of whom attested to petitioner’s innocence, presented issues of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Price v Goord, 301 AD2d 986, 987 [2003]).
Petitioner’s additional contentions, including his arguments that his right to a fair hearing was denied by procedural violations, including hearing officer bias, have been examined and *634found to be without merit (see Matter of Jackson v Portuondo, 287 AD2d 847, 848 [2001]).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.