Court Opinion

ID: 9890538
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-13 15:01:31.902524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.379985
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12848     Document: 7-1       Date Filed: 10/13/2023    Page: 1 of 3

                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                     In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eleventh Circuit

                           ____________________

                                 No. 23-12848
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                           ____________________

      WILLIAM P. BROWN,
                                                         Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      JOHN DOES, et al.,

                                                               Defendants,

      NAPHCARE,
      Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      TECHCARE,
      Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,
      ADVENT CARE,
      In their individual and professional capacity,
USCA11 Case: 23-12848      Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 10/13/2023     Page: 2 of 3

      2                       Opinion of the Court                 23-12848

       ADVENT HEALTH CARE,
       Individual and Oﬃcial Capacity,
       CHAD CHRONISTER,
       Sheriﬀ, Hillsborough County, in hisindividual and
       Professional Capacity,

                                                     Defendants-Appellees.

                            ____________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                   D.C. Docket No. 8:23-cv-00141-WFJ-AEP
                           ____________________

       Before BRANCH, LUCK, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
       tion. William Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals
       from the district court’s order dismissing claims against three
       named defendants. The order is not final and appealable, however,
       because the district court has not yet resolved the rights and liabil-
       ities of Sheriff Chad Chronister and the unnamed correctional of-
       ficers and did not certify its order for immediate appeal. See 28
       U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Acheron Cap., Ltd. v.
       Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022); Supreme Fuels Trading
       FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).
USCA11 Case: 23-12848    Document: 7-1     Date Filed: 10/13/2023    Page: 3 of 3

      23-12848              Opinion of the Court                       3

             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.