Court Opinion

ID: 6026320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:22:36.697035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:02.187575
License: Public Domain

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about May 4, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, denied *180defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the action as against him as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The plain language of CPLR former 306-b (b) does not support defendant’s claim that fraudulent proof of service in the first action (a finding made by the Special Referee but not adopted as the reason for dismissing the first action) precluded plaintiffs from bringing this second action after the Statute of Limitations had expired. The allegedly fraudulent affidavit of service conferred no benefit on plaintiffs in terms of extending the Statute of Limitations, since they could have recommenced the action under the former statute even if they had not filed any proof of service at all. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.