Court Opinion

ID: 9831103
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:49:05.86976+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:31.036838
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
It was incorrectly stated in the original opinion that Mrs. Burr had not filed a brief, and the brief of Mrs. Burr has been considered in connection with her motion for a rehearing. We find no merit in her assignments of error, She had sold all her interest, a mere equity, in the property to D. M. Poor and could be interested in no way except to see her indebtedness to D. Sullivan & Co. paid off and discharged. D. M. Poor took her place as to the debt for the original purchase money for the land. No judgment was obtained against her on that note, and she has no more right, title, or interest in the land than she would have had if D. M. Poor had paid off and discharged the note, and she has no right to be urging the questions raised in her brief. Her assignments are all overruled, as well as her motion for rehearing.
The motions for rehearing of D. M. Poor and Helen Raley are also overruled.