Court Opinion

ID: 5094330
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 16:34:50.238463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:32.365201
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellant has filed his second motion for rehearing and his second motion for disqualification and recusal of per curiam judges.
Appellant filed the transcript herein on January 14, 1997. On March 7, 1997, we issued our opinion and dismissed the proceeding. *Page 714 
Thereafter, on March 24, 1997, appellant filed a motion for rehearing and his first motion for disqualification and recusal of the per curiam judges, which was overruled by letter of March 25, 1997. On April 16, 1997, appellant also filed his second motion for rehearing and his second motion for disqualification and recusal of the per curiam judges. Because appellant's two motions for disqualification and recusal of per curiam judges were not timely filed in accordance with Rule 15, Tex.R.App. P., the motions for disqualification and recusal are moot and present nothing for review, and they are accordingly dismissed.
Appellant's motion for rehearing is denied.