Court Opinion

ID: 5650940
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 22:58:58.77401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:34.833672
License: Public Domain

STURTEVANT, J.
From each of three declaratory judgments the defendant has áppealed.  In each case the point is made that the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine the validity of Ordinance No. 268 of the City of Piedmont. On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont (No. 6624), ante, p. 700 [281 Pac. 78], this day filed, the point may not be sustained. In the view we take of the record it is unnecessary to discuss either of the other two points made by the defendant.
Each of the judgments is affirmed.
Koford, P. J., and Nourse, J., concurred.