Court Opinion

ID: 5354462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 06:54:56.5379+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:46.677781
License: Public Domain

The petitioner seeks by mandamus to cancel in part an assessment for a public improvement, the lien of which it claims had been sold by the city together with other annual tax liens on the property. The lien in question was not included among the items of the liens transferred. The provisions of the charter and ordinance in respect to public improvement assessment liens, as related to their due date and eventual collection, are not clear, and admit of contradictory construction. Under the circumstances, the right of the petitioner to the particular relief sought is not so clear as not to admit of a reasonaole doubt or controversy. (Matter of Mss v. Summers, 205 App. Div. 691,696,697; Matter of Martin’s Securities Co. v. Walker, 259 N. Y. 120.) Likewise, the equitable rights of petitioner are not predominant in this record. (Matter of Salisbury v. Rogers, 252 App. Div. 223, 226.) Therefore, it rested in sound discretion whether the order should be granted or withheld. (Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corporation, 270 N. Y. 464, 469.) We do not at this time give construction of the provisions of the charter involved, nor determine ultimate rights. Order denying petitioner’s application for a peremptory mandamus order and dismissing the proceeding unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present -— Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ. [167 Mise. 333.]