Court Opinion

ID: 3729097
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:57:24.372621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:47.701589
License: Public Domain

Since I believe that the plain and unequivocal language ofWood v. Shepard (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 86, 526 N.E.2d 1089, mandates the overruling of Assignment of Errors Nos. I and III, I do not agree with the majority's disposition of those assignments.
However, I would sustain Assignment of Error No. II, because there is only one insured beneficiary and State Farm has already paid the limit therefor established in the policy.
Accordingly, I concur in the judgment of reversal. *Page 26