Court Opinion

ID: 9928878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-01 09:12:12.410095+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:53:17.239820
License: Public Domain

In The
                                  Court of Appeals
                         Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                         No. 07-23-00439-CR

                                JOAQUIN AVALOS, APPELLANT

                                                   V.

                               THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                             On Appeal from the 100th District Court
                                       Hall County, Texas
                     Trial Court No. 4017, Honorable Dale A. Rabe, Presiding

                                          January 29, 2024
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
                        Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

        Appellant, Joaquin Avalos, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s purported

“judgment rendered against him in this case.” The trial court clerk, however, has notified

this Court that Appellant’s criminal case has yet to proceed to trial.                    Because no

pronouncement of sentence or appealable order has been entered by the trial court, we

have no jurisdiction over the appeal.1 See Thompson v. State, 108 S.W.3d 287, 290

        1 By letter of December 21, 2023, we directed Appellant’s counsel to show how this Court has

jurisdiction over the appeal by January 4, 2024. Appellant’s counsel did not respond to our letter and has
(Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that there is no “conviction” to appeal before a sentence

is rendered); Saunders v. State, No. 07-23-00237-CR, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 5410, at *1

(Tex. App.—Amarillo July 25, 2023, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for

publication) (dismissing premature appeal, where sentencing had yet to occur, for want

of jurisdiction).

       Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                              Per Curiam

Do not publish.

had no further communication with this Court to date. The trial court clerk has since reaffirmed that
Appellant’s case is still pending and no judgment has been entered.

                                                 2