Court Opinion

ID: 1025371
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:48:49.197796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:51.570372
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Juan Pablo AIvarado-Acosta appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36, which the court construed as a motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. AlvaradoAcosta,
  
  No. 4:04-cr-70059-jlk-1 (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.