Court Opinion

ID: 48320
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:38:49+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:10.616246
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                              No. 04-51211                          Clerk
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY LEE JONES,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. 1:03-CR-191-ALL
                        --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a

motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967).    Jones has filed a response.   Our

independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.   Jones’s motion for the appointment of new

counsel is DENIED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.