Court Opinion

ID: 1008156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:59.552142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:28.717034
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  William R. White appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Dayco on the ground that White’s personal injury action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See White v. Dayco,
  
  No. CA-01-3480-1-22 (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.