Court Opinion

ID: 9593156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 00:20:14.012047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:22:34.382890
License: Public Domain

*572Guy, J.
(concurring) — I concur with the holdings and the reasoning of the majority. I write separately to emphasize that the detailed examination of the automatic standing doctrine by the majority should not be construed to indicate an adherence to or a rejection of whether, as a matter of state constitutional law, State v. Simpson, 95 Wn.2d 170, 622 P.2d 1199 (1980) controls.
Dore, C.J., and Dolliver, Andersen, and Durham, JJ., concur with Guy, J.