Court Opinion

ID: 7412969
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:32:41.801897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:13.868199
License: Public Domain

ERVIN, Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. I believe the appeal de novo from the municipal court provided by the city charter is a matter of jurisdiction within the power of the Legislature to prescribe and is not merely a regulation of practice and procedure vio-lative of Sec. 20, Art. Ill, of the State Constitution. See Cates v. Heffernan, 154 Fla. 422, 18 So.2d 11, headnotes 6 and 10, and Farragut v. City of Tampa, 156 Fla. 107, 22 So.2d 645.