Court Opinion

ID: 3206963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-25 21:15:57.505473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:00.748439
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-83,663-01

                    EX PARTE NICKI COLIN WILLIAMS, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                          CAUSE NO. W11-40634-K(A)
               IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER FOUR
                           FROM DALLAS COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                             ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual

abuse of a child and was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

        On December 16, 2015, this Court remanded this application to the trial court for findings

of fact and conclusions of law. On April 4, 2016, the trial court signed findings of fact and

conclusions of law. The trial court recommended that relief be granted. Those findings are not
supported by the record.

        When a defendant enters his plea upon the advice of counsel and subsequently challenges the

voluntariness of that plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the voluntariness of such plea

depends on (1) whether counsel's advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys

in criminal cases and if not, (2) whether there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors,

he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Ex parte Morrow, 952
S.W.2d 530 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Applicant was properly admonished of the consequences of

his plea by the trial court. After being admonished, he proceeded to plead guilty in exchange for the

minimum sentence available for the offense charged. Applicant does not show that but for counsel’s

statements, he would not have pleaded guilty.

        Based on this Court’s independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

Filed: May 25, 2016
Do not publish