Court Opinion

ID: 6309953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-18 20:00:30.921838+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:43.464903
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 20-7752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

CLAUDE SIMPSON,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Donald C. Coggins, District Judge. (7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1)

Submitted: February 7, 2022                                  Decided: February 18, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Winston Irwin Marosek, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Claude Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Simpson, No. 7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2020).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED

                                            2