Court Opinion

ID: 6998267
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 03:37:21.140239+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:09:50.746371
License: Public Domain

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard delivered the opinion of the Court. An action, which the evidence shows was in forcible detainer, was begun before a justice of the peace by the appellee against a “ Mrs. Redfern ” as defendant, and upon appeal to the Circuit Court leave was given to amend by changing the name of the defendant to that of the appellant, and a judgment for restitution of certain premises being there rendered, this appeal has followed. The transcript of proceedings before the justice of the peace shows a “ complaint filed,” but no complaint in writing as required by the statute, or paper purporting to be one, was transmitted by the justice to the Circuit Court, and in that court no proof was made or offered that a written complaint ever did exist and no steps were taken to restore it if lost. The statement in the transcript, of a “ complaint filed,” is not sufficient to take the place of the writing that the statute requires must be filed with the justice in order to confer jurisdiction. A written complaint is necessary to the jurisdiction of the justice in forcible detainer proceedings, and unless the justice has jurisdiction, the Circuit Court on appeal has none. Chap. 57 Ill. Rev. Stat., Sec. 5; Abbott v. Kruse, 37 Ill. App. 549. The want of jurisdiction appeared on the face of the common law record, and it was not necessary that a bill of exceptions should have been preserved, nor that anything which finds its appropriate place outside of the record proper should be made to appear. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded, in order, if possible, that jurisdiction may be shown to have existed asa foundation for a valid judgment.