Court Opinion

ID: 3851894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 08:33:03.087406+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:46:57.506718
License: Public Domain

Argued January 3, 1927.
Appearing specially for the purpose, defendant filed an affidavit of defense raising a question of law as to whether or not the summons in the case, which had been issued by one of the courts of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, had been properly served in Montgomery County, by its sheriff, upon special deputization by the sheriff of the former county. The court below overruled defendant's contention, and gave him fifteen days to file an affidavit of defense on the merits. Without doing this, he prosecuted the present appeal.
The judgment thus entered is interlocutory, and, under the circumstances here appearing, an appeal cannot properly be taken therefrom until after a final judgment has been entered in the case: Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal  Coke Co.,275 Pa. 40; American Trust Co. v. Kaufman, 279 Pa. 230, 233.
The Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, does not aid defendant. Proceedings under it can only be "by petition setting forth the facts relied upon, whereupon a rule to show cause shall be granted, and such preliminary question [of jurisdiction over the defendant, or of the cause of action for which suit is brought] disposed of by the court." No such course was pursued in the instant case, *Page 96 
and hence the statute cannot be invoked to sustain the present appeal: Wilson v. Garland, 267 Pa. 291.
The appeal is quashed.