Court Opinion

ID: 562418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:11:34+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:06.224643
License: Public Domain

935 F.2d 268Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.James R. YATES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Thomas R. CORCORAN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-6793.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 22, 1991.Decided June 11, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge.  (CA-90-2697-H)
James R. Yates, appellant pro se.
Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
James R. Yates appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Yates v. Corcoran, CA-90-2697-H (D.Md. Feb. 4, 1991).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.