Court Opinion

ID: 1006975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:18:55.407706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:53.934694
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-7865

FLOYD EGGLESTON,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

DIRECTOR    OF     VIRGINIA     DEPARTMENT    OF
CORRECTIONS,

                                               Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-269-3)

Submitted:   March 14, 2002                  Decided:   March 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Eggleston, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Floyd Eggleston seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   Eggleston v. Director of Virginia

Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-269-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2