Court Opinion

ID: 8447583
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 23:29:48.836114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:56.354381
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.