Court Opinion

ID: 6082132
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 18:55:13.439283+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:53:14.606779
License: Public Domain

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating *624the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of marihuana and smuggling. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he had observed petitioner passing a white envelope to a second inmate. He then took the envelope from the second inmate and found therein a substance that subsequent laboratory testing disclosed to be marihuana. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who wrote it based upon his eyewitness observations were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Maldonado v Goord, 270 AD2d 742; Matter of Alston v Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 252 AD2d 697). Petitioner’s testimony and that of his inmate witness claiming his innocence of the charged misconduct presented an issue of credibility that the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see, Matter of Roman v Selsky, 270 AD2d 519; Matter of Davis v Selsky, 270 AD2d 548). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner’s assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.