Court Opinion

ID: 9579137
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:51:51.612694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:27.790658
License: Public Domain

Bronson, P. J.
(dissenting). While I agree with my colleague’s statement of the law, I cannot agree that, viewed in light of these legal principles, the trial judge’s denial of defendant’s motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be set aside.
My reading of the record convinces me that *371there was sufficient evidence of the existence of some foreign object under the snow. The trial judge properly applied the test to the record.
I would vote to affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Can we do otherwise in the face of Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363; 207 NW2d 316 (1973)?