Court Opinion

ID: 996456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:51:09.262092+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:45.134062
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6914

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HAYWOOD ISAAC,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-83-
235-HM, CA-97-1378-AMD)

Submitted:   September 10, 1998       Decided:   September 29, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Isaac, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Isaac, Nos. CR-83-235-HM; CA-97-1378-AMD (D. Md.

Apr. 24, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2