Court Opinion

ID: 3089974
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 03:52:26.742038+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:46:52.687531
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-11-00551-CR

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JUAN ANTONIO CASTILLO,                                                     Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 105th District Court
                   of Kleberg County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellant, Juan Antonio Castillo, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction

for aggravated assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

      Sentence in this matter was imposed on June 15, 2011. No motion for new trial

was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on August 10, 2011. On November 8, 2012, the

Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely
perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant

has not responded to this notice.

         Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The

time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline

for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

         Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before July 15, 2011.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file

his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 and did not

file his notice of appeal until August 10, 2011.

         This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). AWhen a

notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of

time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.@ Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.      Absent

a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address

the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998).

         Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the

                                               2
availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

       The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                             PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 31st
day of January, 2013.

                                           3