Court Opinion

ID: 2691318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:01:55.548205+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:56:17.739528
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Goins v. Pineda, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358, 2011-Ohio-529.]

               GOINS, APPELLANT, v. PINEDA, WARDEN, APPELLEE.
          [Cite as Goins v. Pineda, 128 Ohio St. 3d 358, 2011-Ohio-529.]
Subsequent petition for habeas corpus relief — Res judicata bars a second
        petition — Judgment affirmed.
  (No. 2010-1736 — Submitted February 2, 2011 — Decided February 9, 2011.)
       APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hocking County, No. 09CA5.
                                  __________________
        Per Curiam.
        {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion
of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas
corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to
raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See State
ex rel. Johnson v. Pineda, 126 Ohio St. 3d 480, 2010-Ohio-4387, 935 N.E.2d 38, ¶
1.1
                                                                Judgment affirmed.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________
        Dana Goins, pro se.
        Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and M. Scott Criss, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
                               ______________________

1. We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument.