Court Opinion

ID: 9963811
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-26 14:00:44.786897+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:02.743500
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-10277    Document: 34-1     Date Filed: 04/26/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-10277
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       MATTHIAS JACOB EDWARD MANN,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00010-LCB-HNJ-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10277      Document: 34-1     Date Filed: 04/26/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-10277

       Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              William Bradford, appointed counsel for Matthias Mann in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
       U.S. 738 (1967). Mann has filed a pro se response in which he re-
       quests the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, Mann’s motion for the appointment of
       new counsel is DENIED, and Mann’s convictions and sentences are
       AFFIRMED.