Court Opinion

ID: 5855240
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 01:00:36.726917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:40.932589
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10135     Document: 00516164379         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/12/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                        January 12, 2022
                                  No. 21-10135                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Guillermo Zarco Villasenor,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:19-CR-373-2

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Guillermo Zarco Villasenor has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Zarco Villasenor has filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10135     Document: 00516164379          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/12/2022

                                   No. 21-10135

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as
   well as Villasenor’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2. Zarco Villasenor’s motion to appoint counsel and for an
   extension of time is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901,
   902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

                                        2