Court Opinion

ID: 8069326
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:16:15.457775+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:14.000244
License: Public Domain

BLANCHARD, J.
The complaint alleged a written contract between plaintiff and defendant for the letting of an apartment to the defendant, and the nonpayment of the rent by him. The answer alleged a surrender by the tenant and acceptance by the landlord of the premises, fraud in the procurement of the contract, and eviction by the landlord. The only evidence in the case is the written contract or lease, which provides for the letting of the premises for the term of one year at an annual rent of $1,140, payable in equal monthly payments in advance, amounting to $95 per month. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff rented the premises to the defendant at the yearly rent of $780 per year, payable in monthly installments of $65. Every material allegation of the complaint was denied by the answer, and how, under the pleadings and the proof offered, the court could direct a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $152.10, does not appear, and there is nothing in the record to show, except an allegation of the complaint, which was denied by the answer, why that sum, rather than some other sum, was not due.
Upon the evidence in the case, the court erred in directing a verdict. The court also erred in excluding testimony tending to show surrender by the tenant and acceptance of the premises by the landlord, and also tending to show frauds and eviction. These principles are so well settled that no citation of authority is deemed to be necessary.
The judgment and order must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.