Court Opinion

ID: 7506391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:32:19.141592+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:20.729207
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly refused appellant’s requested strict liability instruction. See Skaggs v. Clairol, Inc., 6 Cal.App.3d 1, 85 Cal.Rptr. 584 (Ct.App.1970). In so ruling, we reject appellant’s claim that appel-lee’s sale of the pool and slide as a unit constituted sale of a “product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user... . ”
The remarks made by counsel and the bench, if error, were harmless.
Affirmed.