Court Opinion

ID: 3667601
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:17:09.451119+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:51.469885
License: Public Domain

This cause was duly instituted against the town of North Wilkesboro. A temporary restraining order was issued in said cause by W. R. Allen, J., restraining the town of North Wilkesboro from purchasing the Hackett Mill property, to be used for municipal purposes in the way of installing a water system and supplying the town with drinking water.
The temporary restraining order was heard by W. B. Councill, resident judge of the Thirteenth Judicial District, at chambers, in Hickory, N.C. on 17 July, 1909, and, after being heard, was dissolved. From such judgment the plaintiff appealed.
It was admitted upon the argument that as soon as the judge below dissolved the restraining order the defendant commissioners purchased the property, and that the transaction has been completed by the execution of a deed.
It is further called to the attention of this Court that, since the said purchase has been made and the deed executed, the General Assembly of 1909 has ratified and fully confirmed the purchase. Chap. 112, sec. 21, p. 289, Private Laws 1909.
As this case is not before us upon its merits or upon any issues raised by the pleadings, but only upon an appeal from an interlocutory order, the necessity for the hearing of this appeal has been         (615) obviated, since the defendant has accomplished, pending this appeal, the purchase of the Hackett property and the utilization of the same for the purposes for which is was purchased, and the purchase has been ratified by the lawmaking power.
The Court will not pass on a mere abstract proposition. Pickler v. Boardof Education, 149 N.C. 223. In this case, Clark, C. J., says: "Pending this appeal, the new schoolhouse has doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide an abstract question." See, also, per curiam
order in a similar case of Harrison v. New Bern, August Term, 1908. *Page 592 
The dismissal of this appeal from an interlocutory order does not dismiss the case. It is still pending in the Superior Court of Wilkes, and the parties may proceed as they may be advised.
Appeal dismissed.
Cited: Reid v. R. R., 162 N.C. 359; Moore v. Monument Co., 166 N.C. 212.