Court Opinion

ID: 4321883
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-17 20:29:00.192725+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:01.419205
License: Public Domain

People v Muicela (2018 NY Slip Op 06943)

People v Muicela

2018 NY Slip Op 06943

Decided on October 17, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 17, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-11030
 (Ind. No. 453-15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vLouis Muicela, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Elizabeth Miller of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Fernando Camacho, J.), imposed December 15, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096; People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341—342; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256).
RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court