Court Opinion

ID: 8657890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:22:54.003049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:49.110648
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s post-judgment order denying appellant’s application for housing, medical and living allowances.
*432All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.