Court Opinion

ID: 2965226
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:37:32.270916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:38.545327
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 97-1814
         

                                    ALICE BURNHAM,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                   [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Alice Burnham on brief pro se.
            _____________
            Paul M.  Gagnon,  United States  Attorney, and  T. David  Plourde,
            _______________                                 _________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                  February 26, 1998
                                 ____________________

                 Per Curiam.    Upon careful  review  of the  briefs  and
                 __________

            record,  we conclude that the district court properly entered

            summary  judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the

            order  dated April  22, 1997,  and  we perceive  no abuse  of

            discretion  in   the  denial   of   appellant's  motion   for

            reconsideration or relief from judgment.

                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ________   ___

                                         -2-