Court Opinion

ID: 6697962
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 21:59:42.53327+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:01:18.596463
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
It may be fairly debatable whether the case falls in the category of Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147, 150 S. E., 875, or Staley v. Lowe, 197 N. C., 243, 148 S. E., 240, but as there was no motion to nonsuit, and the record is barren of any exceptive assignment of error predicable of a new trial, the verdicts and judgments will be upheld. See Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 412, 160 S. E., 497; Edwards v. Matthews, 196 N. C., 39, 144 S. E., 300; Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575, 54 S. E., 540.
No error.