Court Opinion

ID: 2678127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-06-12 14:11:17.527527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:09:13.320591
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                                                                                   FILED
                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               June 11, 2014
                                                                            RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
                                                                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
DOUGLAS E. HOGAN,                                                             OF WEST VIRGINIA

Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 13-0145	 (BOR Appeal No. 2047645)
                   (Claim No. 2011029622)

UNITED COAL COMPANY, LLC,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
       Petitioner Douglas E. Hogan, by John Shumate Jr., his attorney, appeals the decision of
the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. United Coal Company, by Bradley
Crouser, its attorney, filed a timely response.

       This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated January 18, 2013, in
which the Board affirmed a September 6, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s November 4, 2011,
decision denying Mr. Hogan’s request for temporary total disability benefits from September 8,
2011, through November 28, 2011. The Office of Judges affirmed in part and reversed in part the
claims administrator’s November 4, 2011, decision denying Mr. Hogan’s request for a physical
therapy referral and a referral to Rajesh Patel, M.D. The Court has carefully reviewed the
records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
consideration.

       This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

       Mr. Hogan injured his back on March 4, 2011, while changing the battery in a mantrip,
and the claim was held compensable for thoracic strain and lumbar strain. On June 17, 2011, the
claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits. On September 8,
2011, Paul Oar, M.D., Mr. Hogan’s treating physician, requested a physical therapy referral and
                                                1
a referral to Dr. Patel based on Mr. Hogan’s complaints of low back pain radiating into both legs
and MRI results revealing a large paracentral disc extrusion at L5-S1. On October 7, 2011, Dr.
Patel recommended that Mr. Hogan undergo a lumbar discectomy to treat a herniated nucleus
pulposus at L5-S1 with resultant radiculopathy. On October 28, 2011, the StreetSelect Grievance
Board found that Mr. Hogan only missed three days of work as a result of the March 4, 2011,
injury and then returned to full duty. The Grievance Board further found that Dr. Oar did not
discuss the relationship between Mr. Hogan’s radiating back pain and the March 4, 2011, injury.
It then concluded that Mr. Hogan’s current complaints are unrelated to the March 4, 2011, injury.
On November 4, 2011, the claims administrator denied the requested referrals to physical
therapy and to Dr. Patel. On November 4, 2011, the claims administrator also denied Mr.
Hogan’s request for temporary total disability benefits from September 8, 2011, through
November 28, 2011.

        The Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s denial of the request for a
physical therapy referral and held that physical therapy is not medically necessary or reasonably
required for the treatment of the compensable injury. The Office of Judges also affirmed the
claims administrator’s denial of the request for temporary total disability benefits and held that
Mr. Hogan was not temporarily and totally disabled as a result of the compensable injury.
Finally, the Office of Judges reversed the claims administrator’s denial of the request for a
referral to Dr. Patel and authorized the visit.

        Mr. Hogan has not appealed the denial of the request for authorization of physical
therapy and United Coal Company has not appealed the authorization of the referral to Dr. Patel.
Therefore, the sole issue on appeal to this Court is Mr. Hogan’s entitlement to temporary total
disability benefits.

        The Office of Judges noted that the evidence of record indicates that Mr. Hogan suffered
from pre-existing degenerative changes and a pre-existing disc herniation at L5-S1, dating to at
least March of 2000. The Office of Judges found that Dr. Patel recommended, and ultimately
performed, surgery to treat the pre-existing herniated disc. Mr. Hogan has testified that he was
unable to work from September 8, 2011, through November 28, 2011. This interval includes the
date of Mr. Hogan’s lumbar discectomy and ensuing recovery period. The Office of Judges also
noted that the evidence of record indicates that Mr. Hogan was unable to work from September
8, 2011, through November 28, 2011, as a result of the pre-existing disc herniation at L5-S1, and
not as a result of the thoracic and lumbar sprains sustained on March 4, 2011. The Board of
Review affirmed the reasoning and conclusions of the Office of Judges in its decision of January
18, 2013. We agree with the conclusions of the Board of Review.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.

                                                2
                                   Affirmed.

ISSUED: June 11, 2014

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II

                               3