Court Opinion

ID: 9367235
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-31 13:09:14.01386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:58.190138
License: Public Domain

Fourth Court of Appeals
                                       San Antonio, Texas
                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                           No. 04-22-00663-CV

                                     $16,370.00 U.S. CURRENCY,
                                               Appellant

                                                      v.

                                             STATE of Texas,
                                                Appellee

                     From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 2021CI14611
                            Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
                  Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
                  Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 25, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

           In this appeal of a default judgment determining that the $16,370.00 in United States

currency claimed by Appellant Jorge Perez was contraband and all his interest in the currency was

forfeited, Appellant’s brief was due on December 16, 2022.

           After no brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was received, on December

20, 2022, this court ordered Appellant to show cause in writing not later than January 4, 2023, why

1
  The Honorable Angelica I. Jimenez, Presiding Judge of the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas,
signed the default judgment.
                                                                                    04-22-00663-CV

this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). In our

order, we warned Appellant that if he failed to show cause in writing as ordered, this appeal would

be dismissed without further notice.

       To date, Appellant has not filed a response to our December 20, 2022 order. Accordingly,

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

                                                 PER CURIAM

                                               -2-