Court Opinion

ID: 9478465
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 06:49:31.331571+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:46:26.476388
License: Public Domain

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge,
concurring specially in Judge SGHROEDER’s concurring and dissenting opinion:
I concur fully in the following portions of Judge Schroeder’s opinion: its discussion of the basis for finding jurisdiction based on a well-pleaded RICO claim; its discussion of the basis for concluding that the act of state doctrine is not a prudential bar at this stage of the proceedings in this case.
I concur only in its conclusion that the injunction should be vacated and remanded for further consideration in that I do not agree with its restrictive view of pendent jurisdiction (by the same token, I cannot agree with the majority’s expansive approach). Also, I would stay the vacation of the injunction for a reasonable period of time to allow the district court to reconsider the injunction and its scope in light of the current state of the record.