Court Opinion

ID: 4251456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-02 18:00:40.294046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:30.811264
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-13488   Date Filed: 03/02/2018   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 17-13488
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:17-cr-00008-CEM-KRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

RICHARD LUECK,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (March 2, 2018)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-13488    Date Filed: 03/02/2018   Page: 2 of 2

      Todd Doss, appointed counsel for Richard Lueck in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Lueck’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2