Court Opinion

ID: 2945049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 03:00:34.693711+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:02.749209
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,552

EX PARTE TERRANCE RAY SHUN CEPHUS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 0613530A IN THE 297TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

 Per curiam.
 
O P I N I O N

	Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.  Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).  Applicant was convicted of two counts of
possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to life imprisonment for each
count, with an affirmative deadly weapon finding.  The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction.  Cephus v. State, No. 02-01-251-CR (Tex. App. - Fort Worth, August 22, 2002, pet.
ref'd).  
	Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because
counsel failed to advise Applicant that he had a right to a jury determination of the deadly weapon
issue even though he elected to have the trial court assess his punishment.  Applicant alleges that had
he known that he could submit the deadly weapon issue to the jury, he would have done so rather
than allowing the trial court to made the determination.
	After holding a habeas hearing, the trial court has determined that trial counsel was
ineffective in that counsel did not advise Applicant that he was entitled to a jury determination of
the deadly weapon issue, and that such ineffective representation prejudiced Applicant.  We find,
therefore, that Applicant is entitled to a hearing before a jury solely to decide the issue of punishment
in Cause No. 0613530A from the 297th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County. 

Delivered: May 11, 2011
Do Not Publish