Court Opinion

ID: 3809582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:48:47.10343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:08:15.751876
License: Public Domain

The petitioner, W.D. Lee, was convicted of the violation of ordinance No. 4524, city of Oklahoma City (commonly known as the segregation ordinance). In default of the payment of a fine of $10, assessed against him, he was, by order of the municipal court, remanded to the custody of Honorable John Watt, chief of police, and by said officer imprisoned.
On September 5, 1935, the petitioner sought relief by petition for writ of habeas corpus presented to the Honorable R.P. Hill, district judge, but the petition was denied. Thereupon an original action was filed in the Supreme Court, and the same relief was sought. On September 5, 1935, this court issued its writ of habeas corpus and ordered petitioner released on bail. A bond for this purpose was executed and approved. The chief of police has filed his return.
The sole issue presented is the constitutionality of the segregation ordinance, and that issue is decided by the opinion in Allen v. Oklahoma City et al., 175 Okla. 421,52 P.2d 1054, this day promulgated. The bond is exonerated and petitioner is discharged.
McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and DAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. PHELPS, J., not participating.