Court Opinion

ID: 4133850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 01:42:54.203006+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:16.731301
License: Public Domain

Honorable Menton J. Murray       Opinion No. M-818
Chairman, Higher Education
House of Representatives         Re:   Validity of House Bill 487
Austin, Texas 78711                    of the 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971,
                                       authorizing the governing
                                       body of certain state-supported
                                       colleges and universities to
                                       close streets and alleys run-
Dear Representative Murray:            ning through the campus.

          You have requested our opinion on the validity of House
Bill 487 of the 62nd Legislature, R.S. 1971. Section 1 of House
Bill 487 provides:

          "Section 1. The governing body of a state-
     supported college or university in a county having
     a population in excess of 1,500,OOO may vacate,
     abandon, and close a street or alley running
     through the campus, if the state-supported college
     or university owns all of the real property abutting
     the street or alley."

          Apparently, the effect of the Act would be to provide
an additional method of closing streets or alleys, as provided,
and being a later law, would amend Articles 1019 and 1020,
Vernon's Civil Statutes, to the extent of any conflict.

          Section 48 of Article III of the Constitution of Texas
authorizes the Legislature to establish colleges and universities
and support them out of the general revenue. Attorney General's
Opinion V-818 (1949). In Mumme v. Marrs, 120 Tex. 383, 40 S.W.2d
31 (1931), the Supreme Court held:

         "The history of educational legislation in
    this State shows that the provisions of Article
    VII, the educational article of the Constitution,
    have never been regarded as limitations by impli-
    cation on the general power of the Legislature to
    pass laws upon the subject of education.  This
    article discloses a well considered purpose on the

                              -3964-
Hon. Menton J. Murray, page 2       (M-818)

     part of those who framed it to bring about the
     establishment and maintenance of a comprehensive
     system of public education, consisting of a general
     public free school system and a system of higher
     education.   Three institutions of higher learning
     were expressly provided for . . , The Legislature,
     however, has gone far beyond the creation of the
     three institutions of higher learning specifically
     required by the organic law, and has created ten
     additional institutions of a similar character
     without direct constitutional grant, beginning with
     the Sam Houston Normal in Huntsville in 1879 . . .
     In founding these ten institutions, beginning more
     than fifty years ago, the Legislature has necessarily
     held that the specific grants of power contained in
     the Constitution to erect and maintain The University
     of Texas . . . were not limitations on its power to
     create other schools of similar purpose, and to main-
     tain them by appropriations from the General Revenue.
     This interpretation has never been questioned, and
     is consistent with authorities from other jurisdic-
     tions . . .'I

          It is thus seen that the Legislature has the consti-
tutional power to establish colleges and universities in ad-
dition to those provided for in Article VII of the Constitution
of Texas, and the Legislature has the constitutional power to
provide for the administration of such colleges and universities.
See Foley v. Benedict, 122 Tex. 193, 55 S.W.2d 805 (1932);
Heaton v. Bristol, 317 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.Civ.App. 1958, error ref.,
cert.den. appeal dism. 359 U.S. 230); Attorney General's
Opinion C-525 (1965).

          Therefore you are advised that the provisions of House
Bill 487 are a constitutional and valid exercise of legislative
power.

          Your request is specifically concerned with whether the
provisions are an unlawful encroachment of the city's power to
enact ordinances regulating streets within their corporate limits.
In this connection, it is well recognized that the governmental
powers of municipal corporations are strictly limited by statutory
provisions granting them. City of Uvalde v. Uvalde Electric and
Ice Co., 250 S.W. 140 (Tex.Comm.App. 1923); San Antonio Independent
School District v. Water Works Board of Trustees, 120 S.W.2d 861
(Tex.Civ.App. 1938). Thus, charter powers while plenary are subject

                           -3965-
Hon. Menton J. Murray, page 3         (M-818)

to the limitation that its charter and ordinances shall contain
nothing inconsistent with state and federal constitutions or
general laws enacted by the Legislature.  Wapstaff v. City of
Groves, 419 S.W.2d 441 (Tex.Civ.App. 1967, error ref. n.r.e.1.

                        SUMMARY

          House Bill 487 of the 62nd Legislature, R.S.
     1971, authorizing certain state-suwworted colleges
     and universities to close a street-br alley runkng
     through the campus would be a valid and consti-
     tutional law.

                                  Very truly yours,

                                  CRAWFORD C. MARTIN
                                  Attorney General of Texas

                                                         I
                                  BY  tiwd
                                       Nola White
                                       First Assistant

Prepared by John Reeves
Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE

Kerns Taylor, Chairman
W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
Houghton Brownlee
Gordon Cass
Bob Lattimore
A. J. Gallerano

MEADE F. GRIFFIN
Staff Legal Assistant

ALFRED WALKER
Executive Assistant

                             -3966-