Court Opinion

ID: 9857147
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 13:51:58.789815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:38:04.207633
License: Public Domain

BAKES, Justice Pro Tern.,
concurring.
I concur in the Court’s opinion, and write only to note that a more fully developed record might disclose that no Loudermill due process violation occurred in this case. As footnote 3, ante p. 248 points out, Arnzen was given written notification that his employment was suspended because of his fish and game violation, and he was given the opportunity to, and did give a written statement, the contents of which may have satisfied his due process right “to respond.” However, the record is not sufficiently developed to support the trial court’s summary judgment in this case.