Court Opinion

ID: 4580341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-10-24 05:13:20.257996+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:54.645266
License: Public Domain

Order filed October 22, 2020

                                      In The

        Eleventh Court of Appeals
                                    __________

                               No. 11-20-00035-CR
                                    __________

                 VERNON LLOYD RITCHEY, Appellant
                                         V.
                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                     On Appeal from the 70th District Court
                              Ector County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. A-18-1662-CR

                                     ORDER
      Appellant, Vernon Lloyd Ritchey, pleaded not guilty to the offense of
continuous sexual abuse of a child and to three offenses of sexual assault of a child.
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.02 (West 2019), § 22.011(a)(2), (c)(1) (West Supp.
2020). The jury found Appellant guilty of all four offenses and assessed his
punishment at seventy-five years’ confinement on the continuous sexual abuse of a
child offense and at twenty years’ confinement on each of the sexual assault of a
child offenses. The trial court granted the State’s motion to cumulate the sentences.
      Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The
motion is supported by a brief in which counsel asserts that he has conscientiously
examined the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
      Following the procedures outlined in Anders; Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014); and In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App.
2008), we have conducted an independent review of the record. We note that, in the
punishment phase charge, the trial court included an instruction—related to the
offense of sexual assault of a child—about the applicability of any good conduct that
Appellant might be awarded by prison authorities.
      Because Appellant was convicted of sexual assault of a child, the trial court
was required to instruct the jury pursuant to Article 37.07, section 4(a) of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 37.07, § 4(a)
(during penalty phase of a trial in which the jury is to assess punishment, the trial
court shall charge the jury pursuant to Section 4(a) if the offense is listed in
Article 42A.054(a)), 42A.054(a)(8) (listing Section 22.011 (sexual assault) of the
Texas Penal Code) (West Supp. 2020); see also Luquis v. State, 72 S.W.3d 355, 363
(Tex. Crim. App. 2002).      Effective September 1, 2019, the Texas legislature
amended Article 37.07, section 4(a) to delete all references to good conduct time.
See Act of May 15, 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., ch. 260, § 1(a), 2019 Tex. Sess. Law Serv.
ch. 260 (H.B. 1279).
      The amended jury instruction applies to all defendants sentenced after
September 1, 2019, regardless of the date of the offense. See id. §§ 2–3. The trial
court sentenced Appellant on February 4, 2020. Accordingly, the trial court erred
when it included in the punishment phase charge any instruction related to good
                                          2
conduct time that may be awarded to Appellant by prison authorities. See Addison v.
State, No. 05-18-01263-CR, 2020 WL 4251068, at *3–4 (Tex. App.—Dallas
July 24, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (holding that
punishment phase charge was erroneous because it included language related to
good conduct time that was “not delineated in section 4(a)”).
        We grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate this proceeding,
and remand the cause to the trial court for the appointment of new appellate counsel.
See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We direct
the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent Appellant on appeal. The trial
court shall furnish the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of
new counsel in its order appointing new counsel. The order shall be included in a
supplemental clerk’s record, which shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or
before November 6, 2020. New appellate counsel is directed to address the issue
identified by this court and to raise any other substantive issues that counsel deems
arguable. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court thirty days from the date
of the trial court’s appointment of new counsel. All other appellate deadlines shall
be in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
        The motion to withdraw is granted; the appeal is abated; and the cause is
remanded to the trial court in accordance with this order.

October 22, 2020                                                   PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1
Willson, J., not participating.

        1
          Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
sitting by assignment.

                                                      3