Court Opinion

ID: 9962244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-23 14:00:49.398921+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:19.264756
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
                        In the
         United States Court of Appeals
               For the Eleventh Circuit

                ____________________

                     No. 23-13108
                Non-Argument Calendar
                ____________________

RICHARD ALTMAN WHITE,
                                        Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
versus
BIRGIT BOEHM,
C.F.O.,
STEFAN KRAMER,
C.F.O.,
BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA,
BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC,

                                    Defendants-Appellees.

                ____________________
2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-13108

           Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Northern District of Georgia
              D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02962-VMC
                    ____________________

Before NEWSOM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Upon review of the record and the response to the jurisdic-
tional question, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
        Appellant Richard White’s September 13, 2023 notice of ap-
peal is untimely to appeal from the July 17, 2023 final judgment
dismissing his action. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (providing that
notices of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of final
judgment); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a). White referred to two defendants
in his complaint as both “Federal Reserve agents” and the Chief
Financial Officers of private entities, but other than those summary
labels, his complaint did not contain any allegations that any de-
fendant is a federal agency, officer, or employee. Nor does any-
thing else in the record suggest that there is a federal defendant. In
his response to our jurisdictional question, White stated that he
made those references in his complaint based on his understanding
of federal laws pertaining to the Federal Reserve. The laws he cited
also do not support a finding that any defendant is a federal agency,
officer, or employee. We thus conclude that the 60-day appeal
deadline in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) does not apply.
       All pending motions are DENIED as moot.