Court Opinion

ID: 6927782
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 23:35:48.120022+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:59.689587
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The state appeals a pretrial order granting defendant’s demurrer and dismissing the complaint charging defendant with harassment, ORS 166.065(1)(a). The demurrer was allowed on the ground that the statute underlying the charge is unconstitutionally vague. We have repeatedly held that ORS 166.065(1)(a) is constitutional. See State v. Sallinger, 11 Or App 592, 504 P2d 1383 (1972); State v. Keller, 45 Or App 341, 608 P2d 215 (1980).
Reversed and remanded for trial.