Court Opinion

ID: 9781851
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 17:34:00.046241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:34:40.570845
License: Public Domain

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice,
concurring:
1 48 I concur. I write only to express my concern about the statutory scheme that places the office of the guardian ad litem director within the judicial branch of government under the direct supervision of the Judicial Council, the governing body of the state courts. While the said office is of the utmost importance for the protection and *948well-being of children, its placement within the judicial branch of government is directly contrary to the role of the judiciary in our society. Its placement should be within the executive branch of government.
€44 Courts must maintain absolute neutrality and be free from bias or prejudice, or even the appearance of such, in the conducting of judicial trials. Indeed, the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to "exhibit conduct that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." Canon 2A.
1 45 Furthermore, the said Code requires:
A judge should require staff, court officials and others subject to judicial direction and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to the judge and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in the performance of their official duties.
1 46 The purpose of the above requirement is for the establishment and maintenance of public confidence in the judiciary. Every party appearing before a court has an absolute right to feel confident that the court will be impartial and free from bias or prejudice. If a trial judge in a criminal case is allowed to appoint an employee of the courts to act as guardian ad litem and allow such person to actively participate in the trial as an adversary of the defendant and/or cooperate with the prosecutor in prosecuting the defendant, the confidence of the defendant, and consequently the public, in our judicial system is endangered.
[ 47 Justice DURRANT concurs in Associate Chief Justice RUSSON's concurring opinion.