Court Opinion

ID: 8082929
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:02:36.631227+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:25.163996
License: Public Domain

*636Opinion by
Evans, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Great Pacific Co. (23 C. C. P. A. 319, T. D. 48192) and United States v. Kwong (id. 327, T. D. 48193) the broken rice content of the milled rice in question was held dutiable at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 as claimed. Apricot kernels similar to those the subject of Abstract 34104 were held dutiable at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 762.