Court Opinion

ID: 2653714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-02-19 15:23:59.860037+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:21.750488
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-16562   Date Filed: 02/19/2014   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 12-16562
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80156-DTKH-5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

SAMUEL TURNER,
a.k.a. Jab,
a.k.a. Jabba Jaw,
a.k.a. Big Man,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                     __________________________

                            No. 12-16563
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80097-DTKH-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus
              Case: 12-16562     Date Filed: 02/19/2014   Page: 2 of 2

SAMUEL LEE TURNER,

                                                               Defendant-Appellant.
                           ________________________

                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                (February 19, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Peter T. Patanzo, appointed counsel for Samuel Turner in these direct

criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Turner’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

                                          2