Court Opinion

ID: 9434833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-02 23:57:29.494067+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:23:54.864893
License: Public Domain

*723Chief Justice Roberts,
concurring.
At oral argument, respondent’s counsel stated that it “likely would be consistent with the injunction” for the Government to tear down the cross, sell the land to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and return the cross to them, with the VFW immediately raising the cross again. Tr. of Oral Arg. 44. I do not see how it can make a difference for the Government to skip that empty ritual and do what Congress told it to do — sell the land with the cross on it. “The Constitution deals with substance, not shadows.” Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 325 (1867).