Court Opinion

ID: 2691557
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:06:22.857866+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:57:11.903352
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims, 126 Ohio St.3d 108, 2010-Ohio-3233.]

                     THE STATE EX REL. RITTNER, APPELLANT, v.
                   COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
                   [Cite as State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims,
                        126 Ohio St.3d 108, 2010-Ohio-3233.]
Appeals — Final orders — R.C. 2505.02 — Denial of motion for leave to file
        objection without service not appealable.
       (No. 2010-0386 — Submitted July 6, 2010 — Decided July 14, 2010.)
      APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 09AP-774.
                                   __________________
        Per Curiam.
        {¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of Daniel L. Rittner from an order denying
his motion for leave to file an objection without service on opposing counsel in
the underlying mandamus case.              The order appealed from is not a final,
appealable order. See R.C. 2505.02; State ex rel. Downs v. Panioto, 107 Ohio
St.3d 347, 2006-Ohio-8, 839 N.E.2d 911, ¶ 17 (“R.C. 2505.03 restricts the
appellate jurisdiction of this court to the review of final orders, judgments, or
decrees”).
                                                                           Appeal dismissed.
        BROWN,       C.J.,   and     PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG        STRATTON,       O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                                   __________________
        Daniel L. Rittner Sr., pro se.
                                ______________________