Court Opinion

ID: 3196049
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-20 18:01:19.69818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:45.810516
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-20435      Document: 00513472124         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/20/2016

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                          April 20, 2016
                                    No. 15-20435
                                 Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMILIO MEDRANO RENTERIA, also known as Ricardo Medrano, also
known as Emilio Medrano, also known as Emilio Renteria Medrano,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:08-CR-17-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emilio Medrano
Renteria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medrano Renteria has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-20435    Document: 00513472124     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/20/2016

                                 No. 15-20435

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2