Court Opinion

ID: 3210717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-08 21:05:14.441489+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:30.019563
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Jason Holland appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was treated as a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of the petition as untimely and impermissibly successive. However, the court’s order mistakenly refers to a previous rule 3.850 motion filed in February 2013 instead of this habeas petition filed in April 2015. On remand, the trial court is instructed to amend its order to-refer to the correct pleading.
 

   Affirmed and Remanded with instructions,
  

  STEVENSON, GROSS and ■ KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.'