Court Opinion

ID: 7447488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:13:05.427442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:40.005936
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to *50demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Matthews v. St. Petersburg Auto Auction, Inc. (Fla.App.1966) 190 So.2d 215; Cloud v. Fallis (Fla.1959) 110 So.2d 669; Lowenthal v. Laurent (Fla.App.1958) 102 So.2d 410; Hart v. Held (1941) 149 Fla. 33, 5 So.2d 878; Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.