Court Opinion

ID: 9458511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 20:54:03.366517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:47.633147
License: Public Domain

PREGERSON, District Judge
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent.
Reviewing the record as a whole, I cannot conscientiously say that the Board’s findings of violations by the union are supported by substantial evidence. Like gruel, that evidence is thin and insubstantial. Its main ingredients are suspicion and surmise. Accordingly, I would deny the Board’s petition for enforcement. See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).