Court Opinion

ID: 8439488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:27:41.552028+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:47.234923
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 3:00-cr-00244-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 12, 2010). We deny Clark’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.