Court Opinion

ID: 7433899
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:56:49.328228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:30.432711
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In*804dustrial Commission bearing date June 25, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
The petition for claimant’s attorney’s fee is also denied.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.