Court Opinion

ID: 6651218
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:54:31.140572+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:59:41.780658
License: Public Domain

Harrison, J.
The plaintiff in error filed a petition in the district court of Lancaster county, the object and purpose of which was to secure to be vacated a decree of that court rendered during a term thereof which had been closed prior to the filing of the petition, and by which the title to certain real estate, which of record was in plaintiff in error, was affected; also to be allowed to appear and make a defense in the action in which the decree had been entered. To the petition a general demurrer was interposed for the defendants in error, which, on hearing, was sustained, and the plaintiff electing to stand on the petition and plead no further, the cause was dismissed.
The petition in this action was filed under the provisions of sections 602 and 6Q3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and a careful reading of the petition convinces us that there were no allegations which entitled the plaintiff to the relief sought. From the facts stated it does not' appear that there was any irregularity in obtaining the judgment which was asked to be vacated, nor that the party seeking its vacation was prevented from defending in the suit in which it was rendered by any unavoidable casualty or misfortune, nor that there was any fraud or wrong practiced by the successful party in obtaining the decree, nor are any of the other reasons or causes assigned in the law as sufficient to warrant the court in vacating its judgment disclosed; hence the court ruled properly when it sustained the demurrer. The petition did not state a cause of action, nor sufficient grounds for relief. (Ganzer v. Schiffbauer, 40 Neb., 633; Scott v. Wright, 50 Neb., 849.) The judgment of the district court will be
Affirmed.