Court Opinion

ID: 9845936
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:31:31.264344+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:29.146923
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Frantz
dissenting:
We are concerned here with an attorney who has practised law in this state for many years and has an established law business. He is not a young man.
*363In the Court’s consideration of this matter I voted for public censure and would have my vote appear of record. In so voting, several factors were persuasive: the respondent has already suffered greatly from the matters which were the subject of this proceeding; his past record; his age; and the conviction that respondent will never hereafter act in any manner to bring disrepute to the law profession or himself.
Mr. Justice Day authorizes me to say that he joins in this dissent.