Court Opinion

ID: 8678650
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:47:23.155668+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:27.380275
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. North Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00123-FDW, 2015 WL 5796957 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.