Court Opinion

ID: 9826229
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 15:38:07.098706+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:57.660114
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Woods.
I concur in the conclusion that the defendant was estopped from claiming any interest in this land against the plaintiffs, M. H. Stacy and P. E. Stacy, by his agreement communicated to them under authority from him and upon which they acted in purchasing, that he would claim no interest in the land, and would look to W. P. Pollock, Esq., for compensation. Moore v. Trimmier, 33 S. C., 535; 11 S. E., 548; Shuford v. Shingler, 30 S. C., 612; 8 S. E., 799; Williamson v. Jones, 4 Am. & Eng. Dec. in Equity, 399, notes 34, 35 and 36.
Mr Justice Jones concurs in the result.