Court Opinion

ID: 621361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-01-24 01:02:36+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:56.328739
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                               JAN 23 2012

                                                                          MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 10-50576

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03957-IEG

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
ALEXANDER SOL-TORRES,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of California
                     Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted January 17, 2012 **

Before:        LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

       Alexander Sol-Torres appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month

sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sol-

Torres’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Sol-Torres

with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental

brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                   10-50576