Court Opinion

ID: 8159665
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:48:10.475657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:37.608608
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182, 187, 191-92; Risty v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 270 U. S. 378, 390; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36, 40. (2) King Mfg. Co. v. Augusta, 277 U. S. 100, 103-4. Messrs. Everett L. Looney and Edward Clark for appellants.