Court Opinion

ID: 9832893
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:16:58.371603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:55.044172
License: Public Domain

WALKER, J.
The facts of this case are practically identical .with the facts on the former appeal. Price v. Yellow Pine Mill Co., 240 S. W. 588. This trial was to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for defendant. On the issues of negligence and proximate cause there was a conflict in the evidence, which was resolved by the court in favor of the defendant. Appellants’ assignments and propositions only go to the extent of challenging the court’s judgment. We believe its conclusions are fully sustained, and as no useful purpose could be served by quoting again from the evidence, or by setting out the conflicting evidence, it is our order that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, without any additional discussion or review of the facts. Affirmed.