Court Opinion

ID: 9747758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-27 15:31:31.277433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:26.573210
License: Public Domain

ARMSTRONG, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it affirms the summary judgment as to Dr. Brummel and Mrs. Hinkel on the ground that as to them plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. I dissent from that part of the opinion which reverses the summary judgment as to the district and Mr. Rossi on the discrimination claim, for I conclude that as a matter of law, plaintiff has failed to “demonstrate by competent evidence that the presumptively valid reasons for his rejection were in fact a coverup for a racially discriminatory *1517decision." (McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792, 805 [36 L.Ed.2d 668, 679, 93 S.Ct. 1817].)

*

See footnote, ante, page 1505.