Court Opinion

ID: 4410920
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-06-27 18:00:21.2813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:35.416265
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-41138      Document: 00515012497        Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/27/2019

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                   United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 18-41138
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                  June 27, 2019
                                                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                          Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

MARIO MARTINEZ-RAMOS,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 1:18-CR-503-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Martinez-

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-41138    Document: 00515012497    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/27/2019

                                No. 18-41138

Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ramos has not filed a response.

      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2