Court Opinion

ID: 9620913
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 05:49:27.410473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:04:56.065977
License: Public Domain

Deen, Presiding Judge,
concurring specially.
While concurring fully with the majority opinion, comments should be made on two cases cited and relied upon, to wit: Ludden v. State, 176 Ga. App. 109, 111 (4) (335 SE2d 428) (1985), and Central R. & Banking Co. v. Roberts, 91 Ga. 513, 516 (1) (18 SE 315) (1893).
As to the former case of Ludden, one judge failed to agree with all that is said in this case. Therefore, its precedential value is in doubt. As to the latter cited case of Central R. & Banking Co., this is a landmark case written by Chief Justice Bleckley, speaking for the court, who expressed the point in that case well, stating in part, at 517:
“The groom and bride each comes within
The circle of the others kin; *653But kin and kin are still no more Related than they were before.”
Decided September 6, 1988
Rehearing denied October 3, 1988
Nancy A. Bradford, for appellant.
Johnnie L. Caldwell, Jr., District Attorney, Anne Cobb, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.