Court Opinion

ID: 9386870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-13 21:00:23.292387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:09.103673
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2131     Doc: 29        Filed: 04/12/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                           UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                             No. 22-1800

        JOHN MCSHEFFREY,

                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities; RYAN B. DAVIS, in
        his individual and Official capacities,

                           Defendants - Appellees.

                                             No. 22-2131

        JOHN P. MCSHEFFREY,

                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities; RYAN B. DAVIS, in
        his individual and Official capacities,

                           Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Norfolk. Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. (2:21-cv-00630-RJK)

        Submitted: January 6, 2023                                    Decided: April 12, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2131      Doc: 29         Filed: 04/12/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        John McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret A. Kelly, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
        Norfolk, Virginia.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2131     Doc: 29         Filed: 04/12/2023    Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              John McSheffrey appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a

        preliminary injunction and denying his motion to amend his notice of appeal. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

        stated by the district court. McSheffrey v. Wilder, No. 2:21-cv-00630-RJK (E.D. Va.

        July 18 & Oct. 18, 2022). We grant McSheffrey’s corrected motion to file a corrected

        document, his corrected motions to amend/correct, and his motion for leave to file. We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                                   3