Court Opinion

ID: 3549957
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:03:04.151408+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:48.817422
License: Public Domain

When the defendants were adjudged bankrupts, the title to the property attached vested in the assignee, in trust for all their creditors, subject to any valid lien thereon. U.S. Rev. St., ss. 5044, 5045, 5046.
When bankruptcy proceedings were commenced by the defendants, the property in question was subject only to the special attachment made to secure the plaintiff's lien. He had no other claim upon it. His attachment was, in terms, restricted to security for the lien upon it. This being the case, the judgment cannot include other claims. Laighton v. Lord,29 N.H. 237; Clough v. Monroe, 34 N.H. 391; Smith v. Brown, 14 N.H. 67.
The plaintiff claims that he is entitled to judgment for the full amount of his claim, because the referee has so awarded. The referee was appointed by the court, by consent of parties, under c. 35, s. 1, Laws of 1876, which requires the referee, in a suit at law, to proceed according to the rules of law, unless the parties otherwise agree, and to state in his report, specifically, his rulings upon all questions of law and all matters of fact found by him proved, if either party shall so request. In such cases, when the parties have not agreed to be bound by his decision of any question of law, his finding that a certain judgment should be rendered is immaterial. It is for the court, upon his finding of all the facts, to render such judgment as is warranted by the rules of law.
Exceptions sustained.
CLARK, J., did not sit. *Page 325