Court Opinion

ID: 2171299
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:30.022419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:00:39.715518
License: Public Domain

419 Mich. 142 (1984)
350 N.W.2d 232
ANDERSON
v.
OAKLAND COUNTY CLERK
Docket No. 74338, (Calendar No. 11).
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Argued June 15, 1984.
Order entered June 19, 1984.
Amendatory order entered June 21, 1984.
Order denying other motions entered June 27, 1984.
Foster, Swift, Collins & Coey, P.C. (by Theodore W. Swift and David W. McKeague), for the plaintiffs.
*145 Oakland County Corporation Counsel (by Gordon R. Wyllie, Assistant Corporation Counsel) for the defendants.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Gary P. Gordon and Richard P. Gartner, Assistant Attorneys General, for intervening defendants Secretary of State and Attorney General.
ORDER ENTERED JUNE 19, 1984
This cause having been brought to this Court by appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals and having been argued by counsel and due deliberation having been had thereon by the Court, it is hereby ordered that the judgment of the Circuit Court for the County of Oakland is affirmed, and this Court's stay of the effectiveness of that judgment is vacated. The Court holds that 1983 PA 256 is unconstitutional as in violation of the second sentence of Const 1963, art 4, § 24, which provides "No bill shall be altered or amended on its passage through either house so as to change its original purpose as determined by its total content and not alone by its title". The Court further holds that nominating procedures heretofore conducted under 1983 PA 256, including the special primary election held June 5, 1984, are invalid.
*143 It is further ordered that, in the absence of the enactment of a law providing otherwise and given immediate effect before July 10, 1984, (a) nomination and elections for the Legislature will be conducted within districts as adopted by this Court in In re Apportionment of State Legislature  1982, 413 Mich. 96 (1982), and (b) the date for qualifying for nomination for election to the Legislature shall be extended to Tuesday, July 10, 1984.
Because of the urgency of this question, pursuant to GCR 1963, 866.3(c) the Clerk is directed to issue this judgment order forthwith. The opinion of the Court will follow.
AMENDATORY ORDER ENTERED JUNE 21, 1984
On order of the Court, the motion by defendants-appellants Secretary of State and Attorney General for amendment of this Court's order of June 19, 1984, is immediately considered, plaintiffs-appellees having responded that they have no objection to the relief requested in the motion. This Court grants the requested relief and the order of June 19, 1984, is therefore amended to provide as follows:
I. The date for qualifying for nomination to the Michigan House of Representatives shall be June 27, 1984, at 4:00 p.m.
II. A person filing a petition for election to the Michigan House of Representatives shall not be allowed to withdraw the petition after June 29, 1984, at 12:00 noon.
III. Challenges to the sufficiency of a petition for election to the Legislature shall be filed no later than June 29, 1984, at 12:00 noon.
IV. Since it may be necessary to make changes in precinct boundaries in some instances to implement *144 the Court's order, the clerks of a city or township are hereby authorized to make necessary administrative changes with approval of the State Director of Elections.
V. Candidates for delegate to county political conventions who have previously filed petitions shall be placed on the ballot in the precinct in which they reside.
VI. Minor political parties shall certify nominees for the office of state representative to Secretary of State or county clerk, if applicable, no later than August 6, 1984, at 5:00 p.m.
CAVANAGH, J., not participating.
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS ENTERED JUNE 27, 1984
On order of the Court, the motions by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate Minority Leader for leave to intervene, for reconsideration of this Court's orders of June 19 and June 21, 1984, for vacation or stay of those orders and for immediate consideration are considered. Plaintiffs-appellees' answer in opposition and the communication from the Attorney General and Secretary of State stating that they neither concur in nor oppose the motions are also considered. Immediate consideration is granted. The motion to intervene and for reconsideration and vacation or stay of the Court's orders of June 19 and June 21, 1984, is considered, and is hereby denied, because the Court is not persuaded that the moving parties are entitled to the relief they seek.