Court Opinion

ID: 6033308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 13:04:58.363399+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:21.818406
License: Public Domain

*1331Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered March 14, 2014. The order granted the motion of respondent and vacated a judgment of tax foreclosure.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting respondent’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) seeking to vacate the underlying judgment of foreclosure (see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]). Although respondent did not establish either a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to the foreclosure proceeding, the court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion “for sufficient reason and in the interests of substantial justice” (id.). Petitioner obtained the default judgment on February 24, 2014, and respondent moved to vacate it shortly thereafter, on March 4, 2014. In addition, respondent established both his ability to pay the taxes after the redemption period had ended and the lack of any prejudice to petitioner (see id.; Matter of County of Ontario [Middlebrook], 59 AD3d 1065, 1065 [2009]).
Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Lindley and DeJoseph, JJ.