Court Opinion

ID: 9825447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 13:00:55.831463+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:50.016982
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
It is urged by counsel for appellant that this court has not given consideration to *596that clause in the written lease whereby it Is provided:
“Should the lessee fail to pay the rents as they become due as aforesaid, or violate any other condition of this le^ise, the lessor shall then have the right at his option to re-enter the premises and annul this lease.”
It was not necessary for the court to pass upon that clause in the contract under the facts as presented, there being no evidence to show that the lessor .exercised the option under the lease to annul the same. Whether the lessor entered after abandonment by the lessee, independent of the lease, or whether he entered, by reason of the exercise of the option in the lease is of no moment. That the actual entry took place on May 1st fixes the liabilities and rights of the parties in this suit, and this fact is established by the evidence, to the satisfaction of this court.
Application overruled.