Court Opinion

ID: 998468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:11:38.569227+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:16:37.199451
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-7549

CARLTON RICHARDSON, JR.,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

HUBERT WILLIAMS; ALTON ANDERSON, Dr.; SHIRLEY
CLARK; M. L. PERRY,

                                             Defendants - Appellees,

          and

GRADY MASSEY,

                                                           Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-97-936-5-H)

Submitted:   April 15, 1999                 Decided:   April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Carlton Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) com-

plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.       See Richardson v. Williams, No.

CA-97-936-5-H   (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1998).      We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                   2