Court Opinion

ID: 5558357
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:45:32.721477+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:23.720793
License: Public Domain

Jackson, Judge.
Buffington stood Earle’s security to appear at Hart superior court. Earle failed to appear. Thereupon the solicitor general proceeded by scire facias against Buffington. At the regular trial term, Buffington was not ready for trial, and had no legal ground for continuance. Thereupon the solicitor general granted him a continuance on the terms, in writing, that if Earle did not appear at the next term, Buffington would pay the bond. At the next term Earle did not appear; but Buffington set up the defense that Earle had been indicted in White superior court for a penitentiary offense, convicted and sentenced, and was then in the penitentiary. The court held that the plea was insufficient, and forfeited the bond. Buffington excepted, and the case is before us for review.
We think that the court erred. The state had Earle in her own custody — in the penitentiary — just as securely confined as if she held him in jail in Hart county. She had, and now has, nothing to do but to bring him out and try him whenever she pleases to do so. If found guilty, she can *343sentence him for another term, to begin when this White county sentence expires. It would be strange, indeed,-if she forfeited a bond for his not appearing, when she had him in the jail in ITart county, and the penitentiary is her great jail, convenient to .ITart as to all the rest of the.state. Judgment reversed.