Court Opinion

ID: 8840770
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 16:40:35.376291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:05:11.915828
License: Public Domain

Coxe, J.,
concurred in the result, upon the ground that, under the provisions of the act of congress of February 19, 1875, (18 St. at Largo, p. 330,) and the act of the legislature of New York of May 2, 1881, (Sess. Laws 1881, p. 288,) extending the municipal laws of the state over the villages of the Allegany reservation, the village of Salamanca, where the defendant resides, is not “Indian country,’' within the meaning of section 2139 of the Itevised Statutes.