Court Opinion

ID: 3642349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 05:59:34.858224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:06.025755
License: Public Domain

Criminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment charging defendant with the murder of one Harry Crisp, Jr.
Verdict: Guilty of manslaughter.
Judgment pronounced at November Term, 1948, of Superior Court of Caldwell County.
On appeal to Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1949, no error was found, — see ante, 239, 52 S.E.2d 924. Thereafter at Special May Term, 1949, of Superior Court of said county, defendant filed motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence, — supporting same by certain affidavits. The judge presiding, after hearing the affidavits offered by defendant and the argument of his counsel, denied the motion in his discretion.
From order in accordance therewith defendant appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.
Appeal to this Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See S. v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E.2d 412; S. v. Rodgers,217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E.2d 927; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316, 166 S.E. 292, and cases cited therein. See also S. v. Grass, 223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E.2d 443.
Hence under the authority of decisions in these cases the appeal in the present case is
Dismissed.