Court Opinion

ID: 8442315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:12:50.570246+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:50.596385
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK, 2011 WL 1769805 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.