Court Opinion

ID: 4396279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-13 18:00:33.181149+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:41.195384
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-12532   Date Filed: 05/13/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 17-12532
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cr-60109-WPD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

CLIFFORD RAOUL BLAIN,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (May 13, 2019)

Before WILSON, NEWSOM and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-12532    Date Filed: 05/13/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Clifford Blain, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Blain’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2