Court Opinion

ID: 9404817
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-26 07:09:55.858479+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:17.441531
License: Public Domain

In the
                 Court of Appeals
         Second Appellate District of Texas
                  at Fort Worth
               ___________________________
                    No. 02-23-00013-CV
               ___________________________

              ALEXANDER OMEKE, Appellant

                               V.

CURRENT AT THE GRID D/B/A CURRENT AT THE GRID, Appellee

           On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
                    Tarrant County, Texas
                Trial Court No. 2022-006790-1

              Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
              Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

       On May 23, 2023, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the

appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss

the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the

court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

       Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

                                                        Per Curiam

Delivered: June 22, 2023

                                            2