Court Opinion

ID: 9826578
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 16:15:38.402425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:05:12.552414
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing.
A petition for a rehearing has been filed by P. J. Anderson and other solicitors, in which they review the questions raised in their former briefs.
This petition does not present anything new, and each question was fully considered and passed upon by us in our former opinion filed on August 17, 1940. It will therefore be denied.
“A petition for rehearing which made no new argument, cited no new authority, and pointed out no material fact as overlooked, was denied.” Melody v. Hamblin, 21 Tenn. App., 687, 705, 115 S. W. (2d), 237, 239.
Upon motion the petition filed by Judge Joseph Higgins, Bailey Butler and Louis C. Botts for additional solicitors’ fees for services rendered in this cause is allowed to be withdrawn, and the same is dismissed without prejudice.
Faw, P. J., and Felts, J., concur.