Court Opinion

ID: 7768808
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:49:45.347665+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:59.580219
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Because appellant’s time spent at a residential drug treatment program is not equivalent to incarceration, the trial court properly denied his motion for additional credit for time served. See Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla.1981). See also Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Taylor v. State, 726 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) Self v. State, 504 So.2d 810 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.