Court Opinion

ID: 674367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:53:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:36.368642
License: Public Domain

29 F.3d 635
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hugo Antonio CASTRO-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-50699.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 18, 1994.*Decided July 21, 1994.

Before:  FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Hugo Antonio Castro-Sanchez appeals his 77-month sentence imposed following his conditional guilty plea to being found in the United States after having been deported following an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326(b)(2).  Castro-Sanchez contends that due process requires that his sentence not exceed two years because the Immigration and Naturalization Service incorrectly informed him when he was deported that the maximum prison term for illegal reentry was two years.  This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Ullyses-Salazar, No. 93-50144, slip op. 6543 (9th Cir.  June 20, 1994).  Accordingly, the district court's judgment is

3
AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3