Court Opinion

ID: 51708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:08:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:08.995794
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Barbara Holland (“Holland”) appeals the district court’s order granting motions to dismiss filed by defendants, MGA, Inc.; United Parcel Service, Inc.; Select Media Services, LLC; LFP, Inc.; Mile High Media, Digital Sin, Inc.; and Fraserside Holding, LTD. Holland’s counsel filed six identical suits, including this one, against the same defendants in district courts in Alabama and Georgia. We previously affirmed the district court’s dismissal in two of the suits:
  
   Carter v. MGA, Inc.,
  
  189 Fed.Appx. 893 (11th Cir.2006) and
  
   Clark v. MGA, Inc.,
  
  208 Fed.Appx. 723 (11th Cir.2006). A third case is currently pending before us:
  
   Whitaker v. MGA, Inc.,
  
  No. 06-15025 (11th Cir. filed Sep. 13, 2006). Holland’s claims and allegations are identical
   
   *912
   
  to those in
  
   Carter,
  
  in which we affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim
  
   1
  
  Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in
  
   Carter,
  
  189 Fed.Appx. 893 (11th Cir.2006).
  
   2
  

   1
  

   . The argument in Holland's brief in this appeal is
   
    identical
   
   to the arguments in the briefs Holland’s counsel submitted on appeal in
   
    Carter, Clark,
   
   and
   
    Whitaker.
   

   2
  

   . We also grant appellees' motions for damages and costs filed pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 38 and remand this case to the district court to determine the fees and costs to be awarded.