Court Opinion

ID: 4246497
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-02-20 19:00:26.114159+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:44:02.513337
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-20383      Document: 00514353725         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/20/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-20383
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 20, 2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ-SOTO, also known as Jose Dejesus Martinez, also known
as Jesus Sanchez-Ramirez, also known as Jose De Jesus Martinez-Soto, also
known as Jose De Jesus Martinez Soto, also known as Jose Dejesus Martinez
Soto, also known as Jose De Martinez Soto,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:17-CR-30-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Martinez-Soto
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Soto has not filed a response. We have reviewed

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-20383    Document: 00514353725    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/20/2018

                                No. 17-20383

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2