Court Opinion

ID: 9931621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 16:04:43.563848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:14.364960
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                       Opinion filed February 9, 2024.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
                             ________________

                             No. 3D23-1110
                       Lower Tribunal No. 22-689G
                          ________________

                          R. M. A., a juvenile,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                          The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

     An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dawn
Denaro, Judge.

      Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jennifer Thornton, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.

      Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.

     LOGUE, C.J.

             ON MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION
      Appellant, R.M.A., requests that this Court relinquish its jurisdiction

over his appeal, which challenges the trial court’s final orders that (1) found

he committed a crime; (2) withheld adjudication of that crime; and (3) placed

him on probation. He argues that he is now eligible to have his underlying

criminal charge dismissed and his probation terminated by the trial court. If

granted, his appeal would then be moot. We agree that relinquishment is

appropriate under these circumstances and grant the motion.

      Specifically, we relinquish jurisdiction to allow the trial court to

determine whether R.M.A. is entitled to have his probation terminated under

§ 985.435(7), Florida Statutes, and to have his charges dismissed per

R.M.A.’s agreement with the State. See § 985.435(7), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“The

[trial] court may allow early termination of probation for a child who has

substantially complied with the terms and conditions of probation.”); see also

Fla. R. App. P. 9.600(b) (“If the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal has been

divested by an appeal from a final order, the court by order may permit the

lower tribunal to proceed with specifically stated matters during the pendency

of the appeal.”).

      Our decision here, however, is limited to relinquishment requests that

seek termination of probation pursuant to § 985.435(7). We do not consider

                                      2
or address relinquishment requests seeking a sentence modification under

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c).

      R.M.A. is ordered to file a status report in this cause within sixty (60)

days of the date of this Order.

      Granted with instructions.

                                      3