Court Opinion

ID: 847920
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-03-01 23:36:05.21006+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:15.990904
License: Public Domain

705 N.W.2d 343 (2005)
474 Mich. 915
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Junior Fred BLACKSTON, Defendant-Appellee.
Docket No. 129397. COA No. 245099.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 3, 2005.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration of the issue whether the trial court's error, if any, in excluding the statements in question was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The court should fully evaluate the harmless error question by considering the volume of untainted evidence in support of the jury verdict, not just whether the declarants were effectively impeached with other inconsistent statements at the first trial. If the court concludes that the error was harmless, it should consider defendant's remaining allegations of error.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.