Court Opinion

ID: 1003353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:25:18.305616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:15.217125
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-7567

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AMARILDO FILSAIME,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-96-212, CA-99-1101)

Submitted:   January 11, 2001             Decided:   January 19, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amarildo Filsaime, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Amarildo Filsaime seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.    United States v. Filsaime, Nos. CR-96-212; CA-99-1101

(M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 17, 1999; entered Aug. 29, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2