Court Opinion

ID: 7977769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 01:01:54.33999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:57.507123
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
This is an action brought to recover damages to the land of plaintiff from flowage alleged to have been caused by the unlawful acts of defendant. As far as concerns the question of liability the issue is the same as in the case of Wadman v. Trout Lake Lumber Co. supra, page 80, 153 N. W. 271, and, following the decision in that case, we hold the evidence sufficient to sustain a finding that defendant is liable.
The jury awarded damages in the sum of $550. The trial court ordered a new trial unless plaintiff would consent to a reduction of the amount to $375. To this plaintiff consented. The damage complained of was damage to hay land and consisted in destroying the crop and killing the roots of the grass. The damages as reduced are liberal, but not so excessive as to warrant a new trial or further interference with the amount.
Order affirmed.