Court Opinion

ID: 9366030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-25 19:01:01.084624+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:48.947023
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-10564         Document: 00516622126             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/25/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                       No. 22-10564
                                                                                      FILED
                                                                                January 25, 2023
                                     Summary Calendar
                                     ____________                                Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                      Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Pablo Ramirez Rosales,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:20-CR-216-5
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Pablo Ramirez Rosales has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez Rosales has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10564    Document: 00516622126        Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/25/2023

                                No. 22-10564

   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                     2