Court Opinion

ID: 1021283
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:04:21.018827+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:23.059842
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Mark Anthony Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Williams,
  
  No. 5:97-cr-00142-F-3 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2006; Aug. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.