Court Opinion

ID: 4281921
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-06 19:43:32.440135+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:57.460876
License: Public Domain

People v Murphy (2018 NY Slip Op 04004)

People v Murphy

2018 NY Slip Op 04004

Decided on June 6, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 6, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-12075
 (Ind. No. 1948/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vReginald Murphy, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Hannah Zhao of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Josette Simmons McGhee of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joel L. Blumenfeld, J.), rendered November 16, 2015, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the entirely circumstantial evidence in this case in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and giving the prosecution the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence (see People v Grassi, 92 NY2d 695, 697; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the fact-finder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).
AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court