Court Opinion

ID: 4329646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-11-09 20:53:21.145923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:09.966029
License: Public Domain

People v Zurek (2018 NY Slip Op 07622)

People v Zurek

2018 NY Slip Op 07622

Decided on November 9, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 9, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

1213 KA 16-01159

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vRONALD J. ZUREK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered November 4, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [b]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]; People v Colon, 122 AD3d 1309, 1309 [4th Dept 2014], lv denied 25 NY3d 1200 [2015]), and the valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).
Entered: November 9, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court