Court Opinion

ID: 36060
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:36:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:46.429903
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                              FILED
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS       August 18, 2004
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                        Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                Clerk

                              No. 03-21076
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARNEZ LAMONT HENDERSON,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. H-03-CR-3-4
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Arnez Lamont Henderson has filed

a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).    Henderson has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a response.              Our

independent review of the brief, Henderson’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.     Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.        See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.