Court Opinion

ID: 2880748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 15:05:55.808013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:35:51.531597
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Opinion Filed June       , 1999

                                           In The
                                 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of

the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v.

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the

brief to appellant, and we advised appellant that he has a right to file a pro se response.
Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response.

       We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

       We affirm the trial court's judgment.

                                                  PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47

                                            -2-