Court Opinion

ID: 9838452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-06 15:06:05.714185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:32.954578
License: Public Domain

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                      Opinion filed September 6, 2023.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D23-607
             Lower Tribunal Nos. F07-23026A, & F07-23332
                         ________________

                           Terrance McCray,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                         The State of Florida,
                                  Appellee.

      An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge.

     Terrance Mccray, in proper person.

      Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.
      Affirmed. See Corzo v. State, 806 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)

(explaining ineffective assistance of counsel claim on postconviction relief

motion is procedurally barred when prior opinion on direct appeal expressly

addresses issue of ineffective assistance of counsel); Wright v. State, 113

So. 3d 43, 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[Appellant] failed to provide any details

regarding the allegedly foregone plea offer, which is required as part of the

prejudice analysis in claims such as these.”); Griffin v. State, 866 So. 2d 1,

22 (Fla. 2003) (“[W]here individual claims of error alleged are either

procedurally barred or without merit, the claim of cumulative error must fail.”);

see also McCray v. State, 283 So. 3d 406, 408–09 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)

(hearing appellant’s ineffective assistance claim and finding it to be without

merit).

                                       2