Court Opinion

ID: 2866681
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 01:41:02.271868+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:17.078895
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-02-00648-CR

                              Edward Nathaniel Miller, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee

     FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. 3013028, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               A jury convicted appellant on a single count of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Pen.

Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2003). The trial court subsequently entered four judgments of conviction

on the single guilty verdict. On appeal, appellant asked this Court to reform the judgments to reflect

a single judgment of conviction. The State responded by filing a motion to abate the appeal to

enable the district court to determine whether the judgments arose from clerical error and, if so, to

enable the district court to enter a judgment nunc pro tunc. We granted the State’s motion, abated

the appeal, and remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine whether its entry

of the multiple judgments from the single verdict was clerical error and, if so, to enter a judgment

nunc pro tunc to reflect the verdict of the jury. See Rodriguez v. State, 42 S.W.3d 181, 186 (Tex.

App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.); Smith v. State, 801 S.W.2d 629, 633 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991,
no pet.). On remand, the district court found that the multiple judgments were entered due to clerical

error and entered an appropriate judgment nunc pro tunc.

               Because the judgment nunc pro tunc accurately reflects the jury’s verdict, and because

appellant raises no other points of error in his appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

                                               W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: July 24, 2003

Do Not Publish

                                                  2