Court Opinion

ID: 3105181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:44:45.690664+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:02.609205
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-09-00343-CV
                                       
                            IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
                                       
                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                       
                                  AT AMARILLO
                                       
                                    PANEL D
                                       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 6, 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                     SOUTH PLAINS LAMESA RAILROAD, LTD., 
                      AND LARRY DALE WISENER, APPELLANTS
                                       
                                      v.
                                       
                  THE KITTEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST, APPELLEES 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       
                FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
                                       
             NO. 2005-529,345; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. SOWDER, JUDGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

                              CONCURRING OPINION
                                       
My colleagues find appellants' Issue Two, in which they challenge the manner in which the trial court submitted this dispute to the jury, dispositive of the appeal.  I cannot join in either Justice Pirtle's or Chief Justice Quinn's opinions concerning Issue Two.  I join, however, in Justice Pirtle's discussion of appellant's Issue Three, regarding the admission of evidence of appellant Wisener's arrest.  For that reason, I join also in the Court's judgment reversing and remanding the case.
								James T. Campbell
									Justice