Court Opinion

ID: 4066649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 22:44:16.819054+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:31.071922
License: Public Domain

/0*6-15                  >m
                                                   Ri.GINAL

             IN   TH£   CoufCT OF
           CATMXMAU APPEALS     OF TEXAS

                                           „ RECEUVJED'iw^
                                           courtof ammmm^\ *•
OEVOfsl STI FF
                                               AUG 12 2015

                                           Abe! Afios&a, C!©rf<
      V.

                                                      FILED IN
TH£ STAte OF TEXAS                          COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                                                    •AUS 14 2s:s

                                                  Abel Acosta, Clerk
             ApPkLtMTS PETVTION fo£

                               0*/on SW£j6S19o£

                                Pro-S   W o odi S
 OALL/A4S Cout«ni PueWc DEFENDERS OFFiCE
  pRA^U CficyJIey Cour+S &nl/AL 0»SWCf ATToRHE^

ASSISTANT DlSTAiCT fKTTO^B^
R.ANK CRoUtPf courts BuiLOitf.G
133 N,^^EftFf5o/vlT BLVd . } L6~t c   -

                         \ Ji
             Table     op     coMteMts          p*ge
List of parties                                 Ifjit
JC^oB^i   oF author vt\e:S                      IV

 STATEHEKT tfEGA&D&HG        OftfcL ARGUMENT"    \.

 STATEMENT OF CASE

5tatemEk|t of. (fcoceouAL History                2r

 G^ouhos FbR fiEV]EW

 AROuMCfsfr                                     39

 PRANEft Fo# RELIEF                             T.

 CERTIFICATE or Compliance

 CERTIFICATE      OF 5E&VICE                    g.

  APPENDIX
             Xr^JOE*       oF   AOTHoftmES

Balit v. STATE 530 S„J*L 2d ^ V23J15", l^fe> JTI5" CTey.Crir*vApp;> 3,
Ben-H^ v. STATE B3E S.Wc2cl ^sl)(o5'2 3<9lfaCKx.C/?/M.App.)       \ "3-
Davis v. STATE 319 S-Wl^ 3-19^19'HT8 CTe-X.cRlM.App.)              <*,
                                                                            4.
Osckev v. STATE 5^2 3.W.2d-UbiMQTlCTex.CAt^.App.)
Segura V. STATE %7io S-W.'ld; tig, W CTex. App. DALLAS) mi
S0K0I0W V, M.S. M90 u.S.Cf. / CI989")
                                                                        M.
TERftW. ot410 3qo U.S.C+I Ci(o?)                                      H.
WAOEV. STATE U>l (oUM; lol-S.CTex-.CfiM.App.^                           g.
^TATMT^E^ 3^ ^-S**"2-*,53*'55'** trcx.cn^.^^.-i^O                           cft
  V.T.c.A Mq.ai
                                                                       3.

  Constitutional P£oVisior4
  U.S. Coas4 ar^e^d IV                                             g.

  (?ULES
  Tex.fi. App. P. bfe. 3Ca)/b)/C) andCd)                          2#

  MiSCEtLAjslEouS
    DART CODE oF CorfOucT -5S 2.01, C^                        r

                          Iff
                STATEMENT Of ORAL              APGUMEtW
               Appe.Ma<\4- w4 \oi4ef»n^ 3o xY\\rt. be4vJJee^ 3 C'»4f V>US S4op5-
  loo and looblo^'S S.Lamar and loo UooAs4. S4inSorx +e$+,*»«* '
  Appellor*. S+ag^ered aS fc«> gjat k«d 4o+W* location Suc^d-m^
 4V\©4
Comply a SWorV disVa/\ce- a£-Ur 54m$an amd to.acK Up o&P|'ce<*
Cc\ugVx4- AppetWA-. S4»ns©»> s4x-Ved Wt\G-Wce4 / d^4«a4ion,
 Appel\aj4V\i*vj:Wo.4 appectred 4c« We 01 46 Jot a£ / C©,CaiA e IfvSide..
  O-f-fiCef Sdv^Son tWa ^rookc'di \r\ -for poS5e!$l'oA UJi4v\ |r\4ev\A
  4o dclivier oVcr VOo ^ra/vss and <<2Vad