Court Opinion

ID: 4696222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-16 20:02:31.529105+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:39.245373
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                        Filed: May 21, 2021

* * * * * * * * * * * * *  *
TAMMY COPPING,             *                                     UNPUBLISHED
                           *
         Petitioner,       *                                     No. 18-1466V
                           *                                     Special Master Gowen
v.                         *
                           *                                     Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
SECRETARY OF HEALTH        *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,        *
                           *
         Respondent.       *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Mark K. Hellie, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                         DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

        On March 4, 2021, Tammy Copping (“Petitioner”) filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and
costs. Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (“Fees App.”) (ECF No. 40). For the reasons discussed
below, I GRANT Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and award a total of $12,096.44.

    I.        Procedural History

        On September 24, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Program.2 Petition at Preamble. (ECF No. 1). Petitioner received an influenza
vaccine on October 21, 2016. Stipulation at ¶ 2 (ECF No. 49). Petitioner alleges that as a result of
receiving an influenza vaccine, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.
Id; Stipulation ¶ 4. On December 21, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation, which I adopted as my
decision awarding compensation on the same day. (ECF No. 34).
1
  I intend to post this Ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the Ruling will be
available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services).

2
 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine
Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
        On March 4, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion for final attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner
requests compensation in the total amount of $12,096.44, representing $11,387.10 in attorneys’
fees and $709.34 in costs. Fees App. at 2. Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants she
did not personally incur costs in pursuit of her claim. Id. Respondent filed his response on March
17, 2021, stating that “Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’
fees and costs are met in this case.” Response at 2 (ECF No. 40). Petitioner did not file a reply to
Respondent’s response.

         The matter is now ripe for adjudication.

   II.      Analysis

       Under the Vaccine Act, the special master may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
for a petition that does not result in an award of compensation but was filed in good faith and
supported by a reasonable basis. § 300aa–15(e)(1). Here, because Petitioner was awarded
compensation pursuant to a stipulation, she is entitled to a reasonable award of final attorneys’
fees and costs.

         Petitioners “bea[r] the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and
the expenses incurred” are reasonable. Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482,
484 (1993). Adequate proof of the claimed fees and costs should be presented when the motion is
filed. Id. at 484 n. 1. The special master has the discretion to reduce awards sua sponte, independent
of enumerated objections from the respondent. Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed.
Cl. 201, 208–09 (Fed. Cl. 2009); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed.
Cl. 2008), aff'd No. 99–537V, 2008 WL 2066611 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008).

                a. Attorneys’ Fees

        Petitioner requests the following rates for the work of her counsel, Mr. Paul Brazil: $317.00
per hour for work performed in 2018, $325.00 per hour for work performed in 2019, $350.00 per
hour for work performed in 2020, and $375.00 per hour for work performed in 2021. These rates
are consistent with what Mr. Brazil has previously been awarded for his Vaccine Program work,
and I find them reasonable for work performed in the instant case as well.

        Turning next to review of the submitted billing statement, I find that the overall hours spent
on this matter appear to be reasonable. The entries are reasonable and accurately describe the work
being performed and the length of time it took to perform each task. Respondent also has not
identified any particular entries as being objectionable. Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to final
attorneys’ fees of $11,387.10.

                b. Attorneys’ Costs

       Like attorneys’ fees, a request for reimbursement of costs must be reasonable. Perreira v.
Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (Fed. Cl. 1992). Petitioner requests total
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $709.34. This amount is comprised of acquiring medical records,

                                                    2
postage, and the Court’s filing fee. Fees App. at 12. All of these costs are typical of Vaccine
Program litigation, are reasonable in my experience, and have been supported by Petitioner with
adequate documentation. Accordingly, Petitioner is awarded the full amount of costs requested.

    III.     Conclusion

       Accordingly, I award a lump sum in the amount of $12,096.44, representing
reimbursement for Petitioner’s attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable to
Petitioner and her attorney, Mr. Paul Brazil.3

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

           IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      /s/Thomas L. Gowen
                                                      Thomas L. Gowen
                                                      Special Master

3
  This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by
the attorney against a client, “advanced costs,” and fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, Section 15(e)(3)
prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded
herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
4
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine
Rule 11(a).

                                                          3