Court Opinion

ID: 3213949
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-06-16 16:02:36.348902+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:29:46.197721
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                       No. 15-630V
                                   Filed: May 23, 2016
                                  [Not to be published]

*********************
WENDY EARLY, on behalf of           *
minor child, C.B.,                  *
                                    *
                     Petitioner,    *                     Dismissal; Gardasil;
       v.                           *                     Autonomic Dysfunction; Syncopy;
                                    *                     Adrenal Gland Insufficiency;
                                    *                     Irregular Heart Rate; Headaches;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                 *                     Chronic Nausea; Depression;
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                 *                     Hand and Foot Tremors; Anxiety.
                                    *
                     Respondent. *
*********************
Larry D. Wright, Wright & Fisher, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for petitioner.
Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

                                            DECISION1
Gowen, Special Master:

        On June 19, 2015, petitioner filed a petition on behalf of her minor child, C.B., for
compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program [“the Program”],2 alleging
that a Gardasil vaccination received on June 20, 2012, caused C.B. to suffer irregular heart rate
and syncopy, adrenal gland insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction, chronic nausea, hand and foot
tremors, hand discoloration, anxiety, headaches, and depression. Petition at Preamble, filed June

1
 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that
satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion
for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified
material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public
access.
2
 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L.
No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter
“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
of the Act.
                                                  1
19, 2015. The information in the record, however, does not show entitlement to an award under
the Program.

        On May 23, 2016, petitioner moved for a decision dismissing this petition, stating that “[a]n
investigation of the facts and science supporting Petitioner’s claim has demonstrated that Petitioner
will be unable to prove she is entitled to compensation in the Vaccine Program.” Motion
Dismissing the Petition at ¶ 1, filed May 23, 2016.

        To receive compensation under the Program, petitioner must prove either (1) that C.B.
suffered a “Table Injury”—i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table—corresponding
to the vaccination, or (2) that C.B. suffered an injury that was actually caused by the vaccination.
See §§ 13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that
C.B. suffered a “Table Injury.” Further, the record does not contain persuasive evidence indicating
that C.B.’s alleged injuries was caused by the Gardasil vaccine.

        Under the Act, petitioner may not be given a Program award based solely on the petitioner’s
claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical records or by the opinion
of a competent physician. § 13(a)(1). In this case, because there are insufficient medical records
supporting petitioner’s claim, a medical opinion must be offered in support. Petitioner, however,
has offered no such opinion that supports a finding of entitlement.

         Accordingly, it is clear from the record in this case that petitioner has failed to demonstrate
either that C.B. suffered a “Table Injury” or that the injuries were “actually caused” by the Gardasil
vaccination. Thus, this case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter
judgment accordingly.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                        / Thomas L. Gowen
                                        Thomas L. Gowen
                                        Special Master

                                                   2