Court Opinion

ID: 8451566
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:37:38.943225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.077656
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Bernard King appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not lower Gore’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.