Court Opinion

ID: 8420175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 20:11:57.05925+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:22.912986
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Bruce Charles Heggen appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice his motion for return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Heggen, No. CR-01-46 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED