Court Opinion

ID: 5765035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:21:07.914319+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:37.803002
License: Public Domain

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s finding that claimant made willful misrepresentations to obtain unemployment insurance benefits, thereby justifying the imposition of a recoverable overpayment and forfeiture of future benefits (see Matter of Sexton [Commissioner of Labor], 51 AD3d 1312, 1312 [2008]), notwithstanding claimant’s contention that the misrepresentations were not knowingly made (see Matter of McBurney [Commissioner of Labor], 46 AD3d 1308 [2007]; Matter of Piccirilli [Roberts], 92 AD2d 686 [1983]). Specifically, the record reveals that, during the benefits *1151period when claimant repeatedly certified that she was not employed or self-employed, she was engaged in start-up activities for a home daycare business, including acquiring a business certifícate and tax identification number, registering with the Office of Children and Family Services, taking appropriate training and classes, purchasing business supplies and advertising for the business (see Matter of Raspallo [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 751, 751-752 [2004]). Accordingly, the Board’s decision is affirmed.
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.