Court Opinion

ID: 2809978
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-06-19 04:36:02.679279+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:33.563010
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-14-00054-CR

                            Mechelle Lynn Ellis-Henry, Appellant

                                                v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

           FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY
            NO. 41955, HONORABLE EDWARD L. JARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Mechelle Ellis-Henry was charged with the misdemeanor offense of driving while

her license was suspended or invalid, enhanced by an allegation of a previous conviction for the

same offense. See Tex. Transp. Code § 521.457(a)(2), (f)(1). A jury convicted Ellis-Henry of the

charged offense and assessed punishment at confinement in the Caldwell County Jail for 90 days and

a $250.00 fine. At sentencing, the court ordered Ellis-Henry to pay court-appointed attorneys’ fees

in the amount of $1,004.20.1 In one issue, Ellis-Henry contends that the court erred by assessing

attorneys’ fees against her because she had been found indigent at the outset of the case, and the

State presented no evidence that her financial circumstances had changed. The State concedes error.

We will modify the judgment and, as modified, affirm it.

       1
         The written judgment of conviction does not include an order that Ellis-Henry pay any
court-appointed attorneys’ fees. However, when a conflict exists between the oral pronouncement
and the written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls. See Coffey v. State, 979 S.W.2d 326,
328 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
               Ellis-Henry was found indigent at the outset of the case and counsel was appointed

to represent her. The procedure for ordering formerly indigent defendants to pay attorneys’ fees for

court-appointed counsel is set forth in article 26.05(g) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.05(g). Pursuant to this article, once a defendant is declared indigent,

a trial court may order a defendant to pay for the costs of “legal services provided” only if it

determines that the “defendant has financial resources that enable him to offset in part or in whole

the costs.” Id. A defendant who has previously been found indigent is presumed to remain indigent

unless there is a “material change” in her financial status and, in the absence of any indication in the

record that her financial status has in fact changed, the trial court may not impose attorneys’ fees.

Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Thus, a trial court may assess attorneys’

fees against a formerly indigent defendant only when it makes a finding that the defendant’s financial

status has in fact changed. Wiley v. State, 410 S.W.3d 313, 317 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Absent such

a finding or any other evidence in the record indicating a change in financial status, the evidence is

insufficient to support imposition of attorneys’ fees. Id. A defendant may challenge the sufficiency

of the evidence of her changed financial resources and ability to pay for the first time on appeal.

See Mayer, 309 S.W.3d at 556.

               Ellis-Henry was found indigent at the outset of the case and counsel was appointed

to represent her on September 17, 2012. The record does not contain any evidence that Ellis-Henry’s

financial condition changed between that date and the date she was ordered to pay attorneys’ fees.

The trial court made no findings on the record indicating that Ellis-Henry’s financial status had

changed such that she was able to offset in whole or in part the costs of the legal services provided

                                                   2
to her. The trial court erred by ordering Ellis-Henry to pay court-appointed attorneys’ fees. We

sustain Ellis-Henry’s sole appellate issue.

                                         CONCLUSION

               Having sustained Ellis-Henry’s sole appellate issue, we modify the trial court’s

judgment to delete the order that Ellis-Henry pay $1,004.20 for court-appointed attorneys’ fees. As

modified, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

                                              __________________________________________

                                              Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed

Filed: June 16, 2015

Do Not Publish

                                                 3