Court Opinion

ID: 8766948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 12:29:06.918851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:56.951382
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
As both parties deraigned title from a common source, the validity of a prior tax title was immaterial.
As the defendant below neither connected himself with the alleged outstanding title, nor traced it to any person at a time subsequent to the conveyance to the common-source title, the questions arising in relation to outstanding title in another were also immaterial. See Rice v. St. Louis, etc., Ry., 87 Tex. 90, 93, 26 S. W. 1047, 47 Am. St. Rep. 72, and cases there cited.
As against the defendant as tenant, the plaintiff was not called upon to show title or adverse possession within the prescriptive statute. The vital issue in the case was tenancy vel non, and on that the instructions to the jury were full, and, if erroneous at all, the error was in favor of the defendant.
The judgment of the Circuit Court seems to be in accordance with the justice of the case, and it is affirmed.