Court Opinion

ID: 5669841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 14:09:57.641151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:33.799257
License: Public Domain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered December 18, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs husband was murdered by an individual who, having stolen one of defendant Verizon’s vehicles, gained admission to plaintiffs home by representing that he was a Verizon employee. There is no allegation that the assailant was, in fact, a Verizon employee, only that Verizon’s negligence in safeguarding its vehicle placed the impostor in a position to harm plaintiff and her husband. Defendant, however, had no relationship with plaintiff and her husband sufficient to support imposing upon it a duty to protect them from the criminal conduct of a third party over whom it had neither supervision nor control (see Hamilton v Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 96 NY2d 222 [2001]; Lauer v City of New York, 95 NY2d 95, 100 [2000]). Accordingly, the *331complaint was properly dismissed. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Williams and Friedman, JJ.