Court Opinion

ID: 6150573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 15:49:34.274992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:55:00.964819
License: Public Domain

Green, J.
I am of the opinion .that the objection made by the defendant, that the notice of the entry of the judgment is a nullity on account of the misspelling of the name by adding an “ n ” to the surname is not good. Gersman spelled “ Gersmann ” sounds the same and cannot be said to mislead. It is a case of idem sonans; it sounds alike, and that has been held sufficient. People ex rel. Kenyon v. Sutherland, 81 N. Y. 12. The second objection,- that the notice of the entry of judgment is insufficient; is likewise untenable, and the fact that part of' the notice is printed and part written is not in contravention of the Code, and *157has been repeatedly held good. The third objection, however, that plaintiff entered judgment- and served notice of entry which set in motion and operation the limitation of the time to appeal, is serious on account of the stay of proceedings which was granted by the trial justice. I am of the opinion that by thus proceeding the plaintiff violated the stay, and that he had no right to enter judgment nor serve notice of entry thereof. The motion to compel acceptance of the notice of appeal is, therefore, granted upon the authority of Kerner v. Heck, 9 N. Y. Supp. 303, and White v. Klinken, 16 Abb. Pr. 109.
■Motion granted.