Court Opinion

ID: 5433132
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 17:49:06.938157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:42.516567
License: Public Domain

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
The'petitioner was arrested on final process of the Court below, to *240answer a judgment obtained against Mm, in an action for assault and battery.
The seventy-third section of the Practice Act provides, that “ the defendant may be arrested when the action is for willful injury to person or character,” etc. This provision is directly in conflict with the fifteenth section of Article I of the Constitution of this State, which provides, that “ no person shall be imprisoned for debt in any civil action, on mesne or final process, unless in case of fraud,” etc. See case of Holdforth, 1 Cal. R., 438.
An assault and battery is not a case of fraud, in .the sense that that term is employed by the Constitution; neither can it be made so by the Legislature; and the judgment is a debt, as much as though recovered in an action of assumpsit.
The defendant must be discharged.