Court Opinion

ID: 9750717
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 15:26:49.026413+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:19.757538
License: Public Domain

SPAETH, Judge,
dissenting.
I join in the President Judge’s dissenting statement, but add this comment on remedy. I believe we should remand for another Rule 1100(f) hearing. Although the Commonwealth did not argue that the trial was timely even without appellant’s waiver, facts in the record suggest it might have been. If it was, we should affirm, for we may affirm an order for any reason supported by the record, even though that reason was not argued below. Commonwealth v. Shoatz, 469 Pa. 545, 366 A.2d 1216 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ditmore, 242 Pa.Super. 248, 363 A.2d 1253 (1976).
*628Reports of cases decided by the Superior Court in which the order, decree, judgment or decision of the court below was affirmed or otherwise disposed of without opinion or without extended opinion.