Court Opinion

ID: 1010569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:13:54.691953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:41.114639
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                          FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 03-6290

DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellant,

             versus

DAN BRAXTON; MAJOR FLEMING;          S.   MULLINS,
Lieutenant; RON FOWLER,

                                               Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-1126-7)

Submitted:    May 15, 2003                      Decided:   May 22, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Edward Crawley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     David Edward Crawley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000).   This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).    The

order Crawley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.    See Domino Sugar

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th

Cir. 1993).    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2