Court Opinion

ID: 992861
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:59:01.629287+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:52.773979
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-6700

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

           versus

WILLIAM   LEWIS HINSON,    a/k/a William Louis
Hinson,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-258-P)

Submitted:   August 19, 1997               Decided:   August 29, 1997

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lewis Hinson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion to withdraw his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Hinson, No. CR-93-258-P (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1997).
We further deny Appellant's "Motion to Object Appeal." We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2