Court Opinion

ID: 9397909
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-26 21:01:53.848662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:28.671687
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2235      Doc: 31         Filed: 05/25/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2235

        FREDRICK W. HEROLD, JR.,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.; BRADFORD E.
        BUGHER; KRISTINA HEROLD; JESSE B. HAMMOCK; PETER R. COTTER;
        PARKER GOODMAN GORDON & HAMMOCK, LLC,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
        George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00610-GLR)

        Submitted: May 23, 2023                                           Decided: May 25, 2023

        Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Mark Murdock, POTTER & MURDOCK,
        PC, Falls Church, Virginia; Mary Hirth Tolbert, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC,
        Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Peter Russell Cotter, Jesse Bela Hammock, PARKER
        GOODMAN GORDON & HAMMOCK, LLC, Easton, Maryland; Shirlie Norris Lake,
        ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2235      Doc: 31        Filed: 05/25/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint,

        denying reconsideration, and enjoining Herold from filing any more actions related to his

        inheritance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s orders. Herold v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.,

        No. 1:21-cv-00610-GLR (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2022; Oct. 31, 2022). We grant Herold’s

        motion to amend his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

        legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

        would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                       AFFIRMED

                                                    2