Court Opinion

ID: 1803646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:29:03.100749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:05:12.581185
License: Public Domain

997 So. 2d 1135 (2008)
Reinaldo A. MELARA, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D08-2384.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 12, 2008.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 5, 2009.
*1136 Reinaldo A. Melara, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before RAMIREZ and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
RAMIREZ, J.
Reinaldo A. Melara filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Belated Appeal to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. He was found guilty of manslaughter with a deadly weapon and attempted second-degree murder with a firearm, and was duly sentenced. According to the petition, Melara's conviction and sentence were affirmed on June 15, 2005. The mandate issued on July 1, 2005.
Melara filed the instant habeas corpus petition on September 17, 2008, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Under rule 9.141(c)(4)(B), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct review must not be filed more than two years after the judgment and sentence became final on direct review, unless the petition alleges under oath with a specific factual basis that the petitioner was affirmatively misled about the results of the appeal by counsel. As Melara has not alleged that he was misled, his petition had to be filed by July 1, 2007.
Because Melara's petition is untimely and because he does not provide any explanation why he has waited over three years to challenge the performance of appellate counsel, this petition is hereby denied.