Court Opinion

ID: 9558964
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:19:37.016865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:40.953849
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Judge:
concurring in results.
I concur that the trial court order be reversed and this matter be remanded for further proceedings. It is clear that the trial court order sustained defendant’s motion to quash the information. That order has been properly appealed under the provisions of 22 O.S.1971, § 1053. Stephens v. Parr, Okl.Cr., 589 P.2d 1069 (1979). Clearly Laws 1977, c. 42, § 1, 21 O.S.Supp.1977, § 652, now, 21 O.S.Supp.1979, § 652, defines the offense of Shooting With Intent to Kill. 21 O.S.1971, § 173, defines the offense of being an Accessory. The Juvenile Code in Title 10, is a procedural statute describing treatment of a juvenile who commits an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult.
Therefore, insofar as the reason given for sustaining defendant’s motion (“the Court finds that the commission by a juvenile of a felony cannot be the predicate act for accessory to commit said felony as set out in the instant information”) was in error, I agree that this matter be REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.