Court Opinion

ID: 9518039
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:41:23.467634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:04.658774
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM:
On consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and petitioner’s consent motion for leave to file the lodged response, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged response to the petition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Senior Judge KING would grant the petition for rehearing.
Associate Judges RUIZ, KRAMER, and OBERLY would grant rehearing en banc.