Court Opinion

ID: 8210832
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-30 17:00:45.235365+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:57.499433
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11170      Date Filed: 09/30/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 22-11170
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN JAMES HULSE,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Southern District of Alabama
           D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11170        Date Filed: 09/30/2022     Page: 2 of 2

22-10470               Opinion of the Court                        2

Before LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised
release and sentence are AFFIRMED.