Court Opinion

ID: 2285513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:59:05.185519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:58.125143
License: Public Domain

322 S.W.3d 633 (2010)
Ronald RANSOM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93537.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
October 12, 2010.
Alexandra Johnson, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Ransom appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).