Court Opinion

ID: 1009037
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:49:36.854931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:21.218683
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EDWARD STARGEN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-99-30, CA-00-211-5)

Submitted:   November 7, 2002          Decided:     November 14, 2002

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Stargen, Appellant Pro Se.  Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Edward Stargen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).           We have

reviewed the record and for the reasons stated by the district

court find that Stargen has not made a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.        See United States v. Stargen,

Nos. CR-99-30; CA-00-211-5 (N.D.W. Va. July 15, 2002). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before   the   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                  DISMISSED

                                    2