Court Opinion

ID: 9552876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:18:40.820298+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:29:16.194068
License: Public Domain

LINDE, J.,
dissenting.
As I understand it, the only issue in this case is whether defendant’s admission was obtained during *877tíustodial interrogation within the federal Miranda1 rule, and the majority opinion disagrees with the Court of Appeals only on the question whether the facts of defendant’s situation qualified as “custodial” for that purpose. On that question I would affirm the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in Judge Buttler’s opinion.

 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966).