Court Opinion

ID: 4557365
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-08-20 20:08:04.598364+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:44:47.309554
License: Public Domain

People v Thompson (2020 NY Slip Op 04673)

People v Thompson

2020 NY Slip Op 04673

Decided on August 20, 2020

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 20, 2020
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

423 KA 17-01592

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vANTHONY THOMPSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. LOWRY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (David W. Foley, A.J.), rendered November 30, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [12]). We affirm. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the period of postrelease supervision imposed by County Court, we nevertheless conclude that such aspect of his sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: August 20, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court