Court Opinion

ID: 9863095
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 03:05:13.742233+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:46:55.762286
License: Public Domain

RUARK, Judge.
I concurred in the original opinion and I concur in the overruling of the motion for rehearing, because it was the prerogative *100of the Commission to determine the facts, and these facts include the question of whether Rouse resumed his regular full employment because he wanted to and this was a termination of claimant’s job which was voluntary and without good cause attributable to his work or to his employer, or whether the claimant was required to leave the employment against his will because of his refusal to comply with an alleged illegal arrangement. The facts were susceptible of different interpretations, and the interpretation of the Commission, being reasonable and not clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence, is binding upon us.
STONE, J., concurs in separate opinion of RUARK, J.