Court Opinion

ID: 9711352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:29:51.059198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:04.014783
License: Public Domain

Hutchinson, Dist. J.
I dissent from the order remanding the case for a new trial in the district court. Both parties have- demanded a new trial in this court.
Although the evidence as to values is not altogether satisfactory, when ali is considered, together with the admissions of counsel, I believe that this court could enter a fair and equitable judgment. More than three years have now elapsed since, the defendant sold the partnership property and the plaintiffs have received nothing.. Because of the very nature of the case it is doubtful if the evidence upon another trial will be much more satisfactory. The plaintiffs should not be subjected to the delay of another trial with the possibility of another appeal. I have no disagreement with the. principles of law discussed in the majority opinion.
As this case must be retried, it would not be proper for me *570to analyze the evidence in the record and outline the decision which I would render.