Court Opinion

ID: 9586953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 23:16:48.832898+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:32:57.368674
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
On motion for rehearing defendant pro se raises several points which were not raised initially on appeal. Many of these points relate to matters dehors the record and thus cannot be considered by this court. The thrust of defendant’s remaining points asserts the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Our review of the record in this case discloses a conflict between the evidence presented by the state and that presented by defendant. Nevertheless, construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the verdict, we find that any rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty of aggravated sodomy beyond a reasonable doubt. See Baker v. State, 161 Ga. App. 256 (287 SE2d 715) (1982).

Judgment adhered to.