Court Opinion

ID: 9549217
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:14:56.080923+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:20:00.572052
License: Public Domain

Brachtenbach, J.
(concurring) — I concur in the result but still contend that the result in State v. Arndt, 87 Wn.2d 374, 553 P.2d 1328 (1976) is not and should not be the law. A defendant is entitled to a unanimous verdict as to whether he or she committed the crime in one of the manners charged. See dissent in State v. Arndt, supra at 387.
Utter, C.J., Stafford, J., and Loy, J. Pro Tern., concur with Brachtenbach, J.