Court Opinion

ID: 9394520
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-15 18:00:22.209167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:00.697551
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-60387        Document: 00516750127             Page: 1      Date Filed: 05/15/2023

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                     ____________
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 22-60387
                                    Summary Calendar                                   FILED
                                    ____________                                     May 15, 2023
                                                                                 Lyle W. Cayce
   Abraham Nee Ntreh; Marcia Maureen Witter,                                          Clerk

                                                                               Petitioners,

                                            versus

   Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,

                                                                               Respondent.
                     ______________________________

                        Petition for Review of an Order of the
                            Board of Immigration Appeals
                      Agency Nos. A042 395 049, A042 395 050
                     ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
         Abraham Nee Ntreh, a native and citizen of Ghana, and Marcia
   Maureen Witter, a native of Jamaica and citizen of the United Kingdom,
   petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
   denying their motion for reconsideration of the denial of their third motion
   to reopen, both of which arose under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2. We lack jurisdiction

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-60387    Document: 00516750127         Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/15/2023

                                 No. 22-60387

   to consider the BIA’s discretionary denial of the petitioners’ regulatory
   motion to reconsider. See Gonzales-Cantu v. Sessions, 866 F.3d 302, 306 &
   n.5 (5th Cir. 2017); § 1003.2(a). The petition for review is DISMISSED
   for want of jurisdiction, and the motion for summary affirmance is
   DENIED.

                                          2