Court Opinion

ID: 3069142
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:06:27.035286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:52.616988
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                     EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                 §                  No. 08-15-00129-CR
IN RE
                                                 §              ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
DARRELL ROBERTS,
                                                 §            ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF
RELATOR.
                                                 §                     MANDAMUS

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

        Relator, Darrell Roberts, a Texas inmate, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Sam Medrano, Judge of the 409th District Court of El Paso County,

Texas. Relator asks that we declare his conviction in cause number 20030D01740 void because

the trial court failed to order a competency examination to be conducted pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 4244 and because he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.            We dismiss the

mandamus proceeding for lack of jurisdiction.

        A court of appeals has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against certain judges

within its geographic district. TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(West 2004). A court of

appeals also has authority to issue a writ of mandamus if it is necessary to enforce its

jurisdiction. Id. at § 22.221(a). By his mandamus petition, Relator is seeking to challenge a final

felony conviction in cause number 20030D01740 (three counts of aggravated robbery). An

attack on the validity of a final felony conviction can only be raised by writ of habeas corpus.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to grant relief in a post-conviction
habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of

Texas, Fifth District, 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013); Ex parte Alexander, 685
S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985); TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp.

2014). Consequently, we dismiss the mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction.

April 29, 2015
                                            YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

                                             -2-