Court Opinion

ID: 9775084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 18:43:12.010363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:20.118086
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
RENFRO, Justice.
As shown in the original opinion, appel-lees’ attorney asked the following questions of appellant’s witness House:
“Isn’t it a fact the Alamo was sued so much that they had to change their name? Haven’t there been, several suits filed against the Alamo for the last six months ? They- don’t all change their names do they after they are sued?”
The questions were improper and should not have been asked by appellees’ counsel. The court erred in overruling appellant’s objections to same and in failing to instruct the jury to disregard said questions.
Viewing the record as a whole, however, we think reversible error is not shown within the provisions of Rule 434, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
BOYD, J., concurs.