Court Opinion

ID: 8436358
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:27:58.865937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.338959
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Hatch appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying *774relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hatch v. Gutierrez, No. 2:07-cv-00104-REM-JSK, 2009 WL 361199 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.