Court Opinion

ID: 3647306
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:03:06.207404+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:56.824578
License: Public Domain

The defendants were indicted at the November Term, 1934, of the Superior Court of Pamlico County for certain offenses under the State banking laws.
At the Spring Term, 1935, defendants filed a plea in abatement on the ground that the defendants were residents of Craven County, and that the offenses charged, if committed at all, were not committed in Pamlico County, and on the further ground that as to two other bills of indictment, charging the defendants with the commission of the same offenses, pleas in abatement had been sustained at the Spring Term, 1934, of the Superior Court of Pamlico County.
From an order denying the plea in abatement defendants appealed.
The right of appeal to this Court is wholly regulated by statute, and there is none which gives a defendant in a criminal action *Page 57 
the right to appeal from an interlocutory judgment. S. v. McDowell,84 N.C. 799.
The statute, C. S., 4650, provides that "in all cases of conviction in the Superior Court for any criminal offense the defendant shall have the right of appeal."
In S. v. Webb, 155 N.C. 426, Hoke, J., thus states the law: "It would lead to interminable delay and render the enforcement of the criminal law well-nigh impossible if an appeal were allowed from every interlocutory order made by a judge or court in the course of a criminal prosecution, or from any order except one in its nature final. Accordingly, it has been uniformly held with us, as stated, that an ordinary appeal will not be entertained except from a judgment on conviction or some judgment in its nature final." S. v. Rooks, 207 N.C. 275.
C. S., 638, provides a different rule for civil appeals.
The ruling of the court below, denying defendant's plea in abatement, was an interlocutory judgment, and from this there was no right of appeal.
Appeal dismissed.