Court Opinion

ID: 2872011
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 04:05:50.918583+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:44.908855
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                      NO. 03-06-00088-CR

                              La’Afrique James Hollie, Appellant

                                                 v.

                                  The State of Texas, Appellee

      FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
          NO. 49829, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION

               La’Afrique James Hollie seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for

aggravated robbery rendered after the court revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision

and adjudged him guilty. The trial court has certified that Hollie waived his right of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see also

Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

               The court has also certified that this is a plea-bargain case. Rule 25.2(a)(2) does not

apply, however, to bargained pleas of true at an adjudication hearing. See Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). See also Hargesheimer v. State, No. PD-1610-04, 2006

Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, at *17-19 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 18, 2006).
              Based on the certification that Hollie waived his right of appeal, the appeal is

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

                                           __________________________________________

                                           W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 2, 2006

Do Not Publish

                                              2