Court Opinion

ID: 9602090
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 01:51:45.166972+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:02:00.662487
License: Public Domain

Quillian, Judge,
concurring specially.
Every error in the charge and in the verdict and judgment were all induced by all counsel and acquiesced in by them. Errors of that type do not authorize an appellate court to grant a new trial.
As to the sister-joint owner of one of the tracts taken, she is, as Judge Stolz suggests, totally unaffected by any judgment for she was not a party to the trial. Therefore, the judgment as to her is unenforceable and void. But since all the errors appealed from were self-induced and acquiesced in by counsel, the parties have no standing to complain and are bound by the judgment.
I am authorized to state that Chief Judge Bell and Judge Deen concur with that which is written herein.