Court Opinion

ID: 9889556
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-10 17:18:11.434343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.138445
License: Public Domain

STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                          NO.     2023      KW     0740

VERSUS

WALTER       E.     JOHNSON,       JR.                                                     OCTOBER                 10,      2023

In    Re:           Walter        E.        Johnson,              Jr.,          applying                   for     supervisory
                    writs,       19th           Judicial           District           Court,                Parish          of    East

                    Baton    Rouge,             No.       10- 82- 903.

BEFORE:            McCLENDON,           HESTER,             AND    MILLER,           JJ.

        WRIT        DENIED       ON    THE          SHOWING        MADE.         Relator             failed           to    include

the         district         court'         s         ruling        denying            the             application                 for
postconviction               relief.                Therefore,             there           is        nothing            for       this

court        to    review.       Relator               also       failed        to    include               a     file -stamped
            of    the   application                   for      postconviction                   relief,           the       State' s
copy
response,           if any,       the       bill          of    information,               the        trial        transcript,

pertinent           district           court          minutes,            and    any       other            portion          of    the

district           court     record             that        might         support          the        claims           raised        in

the     writ        application.                 Therefore,               this       court           cannot            adequately
review           the    ruling         at       issue          herein.          Further,               a     commissioner'            s

recommendation               is         not           a        judgment;             therefore,                   it        is     not

reviewable              under           this               court'     s      supervisory                         jurisdiction.

Supplementation              of        this           writ      application            and/ or              an     application

for     rehearing            will        not          be       considered.             See           Uniform             Rules       of

Louisiana           Courts       of     Appeal,                Rules      2- 18. 7 &            4-    9.         In    the       event

relator           elects    to    file          a     new      application           with            this        court,      he may
do    so         without     the    necessity  of  obtaining                                    a     return           date.    Any
future           filing     on   this  issue  should include                                    the        entire          contents

of    this        application,              the       missing          items         noted           above,           and    a    copy
of this           ruling.

                                                                PMC
                                                                CHH

                                                                SMM

COURT       OF    APPEAL,        FIRST          CIRCUIT