Court Opinion

ID: 9871526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-26 20:34:14.048342+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:19.102372
License: Public Domain

FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the judgment:
In my view, Orlando conceded more than the majority suggests. Although he initially contended that Los Alamitos was required to keep the interior door to the Clubhouse unlocked, Orlando ultimately agreed that the interior door could remain locked so long as an employee of Los Alamitos was stationed outside the door to unlock it when a disabled patron approached. Because Orlando failed to identify a legally salient distinction between stationing an employee outside the door to unlock it and the racetrack’s current policy of escorting a disabled patron to the door and unlocking it, I concur in the judgment.