Court Opinion

ID: 4255775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-03-16 20:24:47.011076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:07.073976
License: Public Domain

Matter of Jackson v Annucci (2018 NY Slip Op 01803)

Matter of Jackson v Annucci

2018 NY Slip Op 01803

Decided on March 16, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 16, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

358 CA 17-00081

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL JACKSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
vANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JOSEPH M. SPADOLA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), entered November 14, 2016 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition. 
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the Parole Board's determination denying his request for release to parole supervision. This appeal has been rendered moot by petitioner's reappearance before the Parole Board and his subsequent release from custody (see generally Matter of Hill v Annucci, 149 AD3d 1540, 1541 [4th Dept 2017]), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).
Entered: March 16, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court