Court Opinion

ID: 4595312
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-20 19:14:47.056992+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:51:25.297029
License: Public Domain

EDWINA DIANE CAMPBELL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentCampbell v. Comm'rNo. 2604-02 United States Tax Court121 T.C. 290; 2003 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 37; 121 T.C. No. 16; November 24, 2003, Filed *37  Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment denied, respondent's cross motion for summary judgment granted. .  By Final Notice of Determination dated Nov. 6, 2001, R   determined that P was not entitled to relief from joint and   several liability relating to 1989 because the request was,   pursuant to sec. 6015, I.R.C., filed more than 2 years after R's   first collection activity against P. On Feb. 1, 2002, P filed,   pursuant to sec. 6015(e)(1), I.R.C., a petition seeking review   of R's determination. On Mar. 10, 2003, P filed a Motion for   Partial Summary Judgment and on Mar. 31, 2003, R filed a Notice   of Objection and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The issue in   both parties' motions is whether R's application of P's   overpayment, relating to 1998, as a credit against P's 1989 tax   liability is, pursuant to sec. 6015, I.R.C., a collection   activity that bars P's request for relief relating to 1989.     Held: R's offset of P's overpayment is, pursuant to  sec. 6015, I.R.C., a collection activity.     Held, further, P's*38  Motion for Partial Summary   Judgment is denied.     Held, further, R's Cross-Motion for Summary   Judgment is granted. There is no genuine issue as to whether P   is entitled to relief from joint and several liability relating   to 1989 because P's election was, pursuant to sec. 6015, I.R.C.,   filed more than 2 years after R's first collection activity   against P.  Edwina Diane Campbell, pro se.Erin K. Huss, for respondent.  Foley, Maurice B.FOLEY*291  OPINIONFOLEY, Judge: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Respondent's Notice of Objection and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 121. 1 The sole issue for decision is whether respondent's application of petitioner's overpayment, relating to 1998, as a credit against petitioner's 1989 tax liability is, pursuant to section 6015, a collection action that bars petitioner's request for relief from joint and several liability relating to 1989.*39               BackgroundOn May 13, 1999, respondent applied, pursuant to section 6402(a), petitioner's overpayment, relating to 1998, as a credit against a portion of petitioner's 1989 tax liability and sent petitioner written notification thereof. On July 23, 2001, petitioner requested, pursuant to section 6015(b), (c), and (f), relief from joint and several liability relating to her 1989 joint Federal income tax return filed with Alvin L. Campbell.By Final Notice of Determination dated November 6, 2001, respondent determined that petitioner was not entitled to relief from joint and several liability relating to 1989 because the request was, pursuant to section 6015, filed more than 2 years after respondent's first collection activity against petitioner.On February 1, 2002, petitioner, while residing in Tucson, Arizona, filed a petition pursuant to section 6015(e)(1) seeking review of respondent's determination. Petitioner, on March 10, 2003, filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, accompanied by a Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and Affidavit in support thereof. On March 31, 2003, respondent filed a Notice of Objection and Cross-Motion*40  for Summary Judgment, accompanied by Declarations, and Memorandum of Law in support thereof. Petitioner, on April 16, 2003, filed an Opposition to Respondent's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. *292               DiscussionAn election pursuant to section 6015(b), (c), or (f) must be made within 2 years of respondent's first collection activity taken after July 22, 1998, against the individual making the election. 2 Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3201(g)(2), 112 Stat. 740; sec. 6015(b)(1)(E), (c)(3)(B); 1 C.B. 447">2000-1 C.B. 447, 2000 IRB LEXIS 17, 5 I.R.B. 447">2000-5 I.R.B. 447, Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 5, 2000-1 C.B. 447, 449.*41  Petitioner contends that respondent's offset of her overpayment is not, pursuant to section 6015, a collection activity. We disagree. The offset of an overpayment is by its plain and ordinary meaning a collection activity pursuant to section 6015. See Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37">444 U.S. 37, 42, 62 L. Ed. 2d 199">62 L. Ed. 2d 199, 100 S. Ct. 311">100 S. Ct. 311 (1979) (stating that "A fundamental canon of statutory construction is that, unless otherwise defined, words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning"); Trent v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-285 (stating that nonlevy collection actions include "offsetting overpayments from other tax years after the requesting spouse files for relief"). Because petitioner reported overpayments of tax on her 1998 return, she generally would be entitled to claim a refund. See sec. 6511(a), (b)(1); Commissioner v. Lundy, 516 U.S. 235">516 U.S. 235, 240, 133 L. Ed. 2d 611">133 L. Ed. 2d 611, 116 S. Ct. 647">116 S. Ct. 647 (1996). Pursuant to section 6402(a), however, respondent used petitioner's overpayment to partially satisfy her 1989 tax liability. Thus, respondent engaged, pursuant to section 6015, in a collection activity against petitioner. Because petitioner's election was filed more than 2 years after that collection*42  activity (i.e., respondent applied the overpayment and sent petitioner written notification thereof on May 13, 1999, and on July 23, 2001, petitioner elected relief), there is no genuine issue as to whether petitioner is entitled to relief from joint and several liability relating to 1989. See Rule 121(b); National Industries, Inc. v. Republic Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258">677 F.2d 1258, 1265 (9th Cir. 1982). Thus, Petitioner's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is *293  denied, and Respondent's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless.To reflect the foregoing,An appropriate order and decision will be entered.  Footnotes1. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩2. On July 18, 2002, the Commissioner published final regulations, pursuant to section 6015, that define a collection activity to include "an offset of an overpayment of the requesting spouse against a liability under section 6402". Sec. 1.6015-5(b)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs. These regulations are applicable to all requests for relief from joint and several liability filed on or after July 18, 2002, and, thus, not applicable to petitioner's request, which was filed before that date. Sec. 1.6015-9, Income Tax Regs↩.