Court Opinion

ID: 9899549
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-16 21:01:05.873498+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:39.387268
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2242        Doc: 16        Filed: 11/15/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                              UNPUBLISHED

                                 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                     FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                                No. 22-2242

        ERICA CUTHBERTSON,

                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        FIRST STAR LOGISTICS, LLC,

                              Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00616-FDW-DSC)

        Submitted:         September 19, 2023                        Decided: November 15, 2023

        Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Erica Cuthbertson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer A. Rulon, FROST BROWN TODD LLC,
        West Chester, Ohio; Neal Shah, FROST BROWN TODD, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for
        Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2242      Doc: 16        Filed: 11/15/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

              Erica Cuthbertson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to

        Defendant in Cuthbertson’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error.      Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

        Cuthbertson v. First Star Logistics, LLC, No. 3:21-cv-00616-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C.

        Nov. 1, 2022). In addition, we decline to consider any claims raised for the first time on

        appeal. Pornomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016). We dispense with

        oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2