Court Opinion

ID: 615418
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-10-17 15:48:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:33.497024
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  The sole issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in dismissing under the doctrine of
  
   res adjudicate/,
  
  Weitz’s claim that “Tremco’s negligent advice regarding the sufficiency of the subcontractor’s installation of Tremco’s product caused Weitz millions of dollars in damages because it had to replace the materials constructed over the improperly installed waterproofing material.” Appellant’s Br. at 1. For the reasons the district court stated in its dispositive order of March 28, 2011, we agree that the doctrine barred Weitz’s claim.
 

  AFFIRMED.