Court Opinion

ID: 1003481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:26:48.897667+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:37.136729
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6774

DARRYL EUGENE HILL,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; M. L. POLK,
III, Superintendent; FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL
CENTER; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-99-563-1)

Submitted:   January 18, 2001             Decided:   January 23, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Eugene Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Darryl Eugene Hill appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court.   Hill v. Polk, No. CA-99-563-1 (M.D.N.C. May 18,

2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2