Court Opinion

ID: 9556889
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-18 22:05:15.294822+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:19.250190
License: Public Domain

Filed 8/18/23 P. v. Bradshaw CA3
                                           NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                     (Sacramento)
                                                            ----

    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                C097860

                    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                      (Super. Ct. No. 99F01695)

           v.

    MAURICE ANTOINE BRADSHAW,

                    Defendant and Appellant.

         Defendant Maurice Antoine Bradshaw appeals the trial court’s denial of his
petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Counsel filed a brief raising
no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 and requesting we
exercise our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

1       Effective June 30, 2022, former Penal Code section 1170.95 was recodified
without substantive change to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.) Defendant
filed his petition under former section 1170.95, but we refer to the current section 1172.6
in this opinion.

                                                             1
       On May 24, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief indicating
no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order
denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent
review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo,
defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument
he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we did not receive
a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned.
More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from
defendant.
       We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
(People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
                                      DISPOSITION
       The appeal is dismissed.

                                                 /s/
                                                 ROBIE, Acting P. J.

We concur:

/s/
RENNER, J.

/s/
KRAUSE, J.

                                             2