Court Opinion

ID: 2271442
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:56:45.290096+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:29.253871
License: Public Domain

333 S.W.3d 533 (2011)
Jarrell BROOKS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94476.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 15, 2011.
Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
*534 Chris Koster, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jarrell Brooks (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).