Court Opinion

ID: 9957113
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-03 18:00:51.985474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:06.610517
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-11127            Document: 45-1         Page: 1      Date Filed: 04/03/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 23-11127
                                  Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                             April 3, 2024
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America,                                                       Clerk

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Humberto Carlos Quezada,

                                                                Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:23-CR-5-6

Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Humberto Carlos Quezada has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Quezada has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-11127      Document: 45-1       Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/03/2024

                               No. 23-11127

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                     2