Court Opinion

ID: 996234
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:48:05.445625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:02.324088
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-1697

JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, a/k/a Jim Young, Adver-
tising for all living and deceased persons
from tobacco related illness within USA, et
al,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARYLAND, and other 49 States and Territories
of United States, et al,

                                              Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-
1260-MJG)

Submitted:   August 27, 1998             Decided:   September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Young v. Maryland, No. CA-98-1260-MJG (D. Md. May

6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2