Court Opinion

ID: 7956450
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 00:16:58.560172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:34:17.250675
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Defendant was charged with and convicted of careless driving. PA 1965, No 262 (MCLA § 257.626[b], [Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 9.2326(2)]).
On appeal defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to establish that he was the operator of the motor vehicle which had struck the complainant’s car from the rear.
A review of the record discloses ample evidence to sustain the conviction.
Affirmed.
J. H. Gillis, P. J., and R. B. Burns and Kelley, JJ., concurred.