Court Opinion

ID: 9487586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 12:21:09.451346+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:52:22.412213
License: Public Domain

EBEL, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I am pleased to concur in the result reached in this case. The opinion for the court quite correctly concluded that the Tenth Circuit precedent requires us to conclude that bank larceny is a lesser included offense of bank robbery. However, I write separately to concur in the result rather than in the opinion because I do not agree with the criticism leveled against United States v. Slater, 692 F.2d 107 (10th Cir.1982). In my opinion, bank larceny, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) is clearly a lesser included offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and United States v. Slater was correct in that regard.