Court Opinion

ID: 7629567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 18:18:24.052701+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:11.604398
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The appellant’s malpractice action was properly dismissed with prejudice, as it appears from the face of the complaint that *1050the action was filed beyond the limitations period in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes, and the record does not otherwise suggest the existence of any disputed factual issue in this regard. See Roehner v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp., 356 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
Affirmed.
ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.