Court Opinion

ID: 52970
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:21:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:18.302790
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                    FILED
                        ________________________         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                               June 27, 2007
                              No. 06-12192                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                        ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 05-00179-CR-ORL-19DAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

KHALID SABOOR HAYNES,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                               (June 27, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Khalid Saboor Haynes in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Haynes’s conviction and

sentence is AFFIRMED.

                                          2