Court Opinion

ID: 8679888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:29:38.67019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.365569
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Sutton, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sutton, No. 4:08-cr-00060-TLW-3 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.