Court Opinion

ID: 5996211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 09:29:28.414083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:05.913185
License: Public Domain

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about May 2, 1995, which granted defendants’ motion for preclusion unless plaintiff served a bill of particulars within 60 days of the court’s order, modified, on the law, to make preclusion unconditional, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
There being a conflict between the court’s decision, which grants preclusion unconditionally, and its order, which grants preclusion conditionally, the decision controls, and the order should be resettled accordingly (DiProspero v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 479, 480). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Kupferman, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would remand to the IAS Judge.
The IAS Judge obviously had second thoughts on the matter and should be the one to make the choice.