Court Opinion

ID: 9768000
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 05:37:58.630988+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:34.692673
License: Public Domain

McCORMICK, Judge,
dissenting.
Because the majority has again erroneously decided the issue presented in this case, I must register my dissent. Although not assigned as error by the appellant, the majority elevates the issue in this case to the level of fundamental error which they have considered in the interest of justice. The same issue was recently before the Court in Antunez v. State, 647 S.W.2d 649 (1983). Being in total agreement with Presiding Judge Onion on this point, I hereby adopt his dissenting opinion on the overruling of State’s motion for leave to file motion for rehearing without written opinion in that case.
I dissent.
ONION, P.J., and W.C. DAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., join in this dissent.