Court Opinion

ID: 989107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:02:09.044343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:53.100889
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-7042

ROBERT EARL BROWN,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

GEORGE HAMPTON, Warden; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,
Attorney General of the State of South
Carolina,

                                            Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-94-1113-18AJ)

Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,
deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Hampton,
No. CA-94-1113-18AJ (D.S.C. May 30, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2