Court Opinion

ID: 9857586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 15:47:36.304291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:51:12.712367
License: Public Domain

Wachefeeld, J.
(dissenting in part). I am generally in accord with the majority opinion but cannot subscribe to that portion which is contrary to and specifically overrules Budden v. Goldstein, 43 N. J. Super. 340 (App. Div. 1957); Kulodzej v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 39 N. J. Super. 268 (App. Div. 1956); Lukasiewicz v. Haddad, 24 N. J. Super. 399 (App. Div. 1953); Balog v. F. M. Mitchell Motor Co., 3 N. J. Misc. 1000 (Sup. Ct. 1925); and Rhodehouse v. Director General, 95 N. J. L. 355 (Sup. Ct. 1920).
The practices approved in these adjudications have prevailed for years and have resulted in no inequities or difficulties warranting our interference with them. I would abide by the rules enunciated in the cases cited above.
For affirmance and modification—Chief Justice Weiftratjb, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Francis and Proctor—5.
For reversal—Justice Heher—1.
Dissenting in part—Justice Wachefeeld—1.