Court Opinion

ID: 2923441
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:30:47.421019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:26.321754
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-141-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
______
___________________________________________________________                                                  
 IN RE: ARMANDO AND FLORA LUNA D/B/A ARUBA POOLS
& SPA
__________________________________________________________________
 
                      On Petition for Writ of
Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices
Rodriguez and Castillo
                            Per Curiam
Memorandum Opinion[1]
 

Relators, Armando and Flora Luna d/b/a Aruba Pools & Spa, filed a
petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March
27, 2006.  After the filing of the
petition, relators informed this Court that the jury issue raised in the
petition has been resolved.  The Court,
therefore, is of the opinion that relators' petition is now
moot.  Accordingly, relators' petition
for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.  See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER
CURIAM
 
Memorandum Opinion
delivered and filed
this 27th day of
March, 2006.

[1]
See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing
opinions and memorandum opinions).