Court Opinion

ID: 9382260
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-25 21:00:18.193499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:38.085942
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7245      Doc: 11         Filed: 03/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7245

        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                     v.

        STEPHEN ANTHONY MILLER,

                            Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
        Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00013-TDS-2)

        Submitted: March 21, 2023                                         Decided: March 24, 2023

        Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Stephen Anthony Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7245       Doc: 11         Filed: 03/24/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Stephen Anthony Miller appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

        § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record on appeal

        and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United

        States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021).

        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Miller, No. 1:10-cr-

        00013-TDS-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2022). * We dispense with oral argument because the

        facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

        argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                         AFFIRMED

               *
                On appeal, Miller requests permission to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.
        § 2255 motion. However, such a request should be made in a separately filed 28 U.S.C.
        § 2244 motion.

                                                      2