Court Opinion

ID: 9375293
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-27 08:10:04.926058+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:57.384176
License: Public Domain

In the
        Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
         at Fort Worth
     ___________________________

          No. 02-22-00299-CR
     ___________________________

         AMY TILLEY, Appellant

                      V.

          THE STATE OF TEXAS

  On Appeal from the 432nd District Court
         Tarrant County, Texas
       Trial Court No. 1639840D

 Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; Walker, J.
     Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

       The State and Appellant Amy Tilley agreed to a charge bargain under which

Appellant pled guilty to aggravated assault of a family member and the State waived

two other counts—one count of murder and one of injury to a child, elderly

individual, or disabled individual. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 19.02, 22.02(b)(1),

22.04; Harper v. State, 567 S.W.3d 450, 454 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2019, no pet.)

(discussing charge bargains). Tilley also signed a written waiver of her rights of appeal

in the case. Tilley was admonished that (1) if the trial court followed the agreement,

she would have to obtain the court’s permission before she could prosecute an appeal

“on any matter in the case except for matters raised by written motion filed prior to

trial” and (2) the trial court “seldom consents to an appeal where conviction is based

upon a guilty plea.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2; Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808,

813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (noting that “[a]n agreement to dismiss a pending charge,

or not to bring an available charge, effectively puts a cap on punishment at the

maximum sentence for the charge that is not dismissed,” such that the charge bargain

falls within Rule 25.2); Harper, 567 S.W.3d at 455 (discussing charge bargains and Rule

25.2(a)(2)).

       In accordance with the parties’ agreement, the trial court found Appellant guilty

of the aggravated assault count, and the court sentenced her to forty years’

confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal

                                           2
Justice. The trial court signed a certification stating that Tilley had “NO right of

appeal.” Tilley then filed this appeal.

       After Tilley filed her notice of appeal, this court notified her that we had

received the trial court’s certification stating that she had no right of appeal. We

warned her that the appeal could be dismissed unless she or another party desiring to

continue the appeal filed with this court, no later than December 12, 2022, a response

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received a response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2,

43.2; Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Shankle,

119 S.W.3d at 813.

                                                    Per Curiam

Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: February 23, 2023

                                          3