Court Opinion

ID: 1015778
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:38:39.316778+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:43:26.198296
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying Nagy’s motions for recusal of the district judge, disqualification of the Federal Public Defender’s Office, and expedited consideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Nagy,
  
  No. CA-98-951-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 1, 2004; entered Sept. 2, 2004). We deny as moot Nagy’s motion to expedite consideration of this appeal, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to strike Appellee’s informal brief is denied.
 

   AFFIRMED