Court Opinion

ID: 5193790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 15:40:14.69662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:00.167796
License: Public Domain

Hirschberg,, J. (dissenting) :
1 I dissent. Until the question is, settled otherwise by controlling ‘authority, I' desire to vote that the erection of poles in streets, urban or rural, for telephone purposes, is a use for other than street purposes and may be enjoined by the owner of the soil. Although no damage is alleged, an unlawful- invasion of real property may be ■restrained even if the tendency of the trespass be to create an ■improvement.
Jenks, J., concurred,
' Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.