Court Opinion

ID: 8121645
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 14:57:56.651817+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:01.766435
License: Public Domain

Benedict, D. J.
The evidence shows that the lighter Martin, beating in the Bast river with a fresh breeze from the eastward and an ebb tide, stood over towards the New York shore across the course of the ferry-boat Nevada, then coming down the river not far from the middle thereof. After having crossed the course of the Nevada, the lighter went about at a considerable distance from the New York shore, and so close to the Nevada as to make it impossible for a collision to be avoided by any manoeuvre on the part of the Nevada.
The excuse given in behalf of the lighter, for going about when she did, is the existence at the time of an eddy along the New York shore, which, if is contended, made it imprudent for her to continue her tack towards the New York shore. The excuse is not sufficient. There was an eddy along the New York shore, but it was not such as to render the lighter unmanageable. She could have gone on in the eddy and have made her tack nearer the New York shore in safety. This it was her duty to do under the circumstances, and considering her proximity to the ferry-boat then approaching in plain sight. The failure of the lighter to keep on further towards the New York shore, as she might have done with safety, and not any fault on the part of the ferry-boat, was the cause of the collision.
Libel dismissed, with costs.