Court Opinion

ID: 8418205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 18:26:44.96004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:19.736348
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM *
There is no clearly established Supreme Court law holding that a defendant has a constitutional right to an instruction on a lesser included offense. Cf. Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980) (holding that a lesser included offense instruction might be constitutionally required in capital cases because of their unique nature). Ruiz’s state court conviction thus has not “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1172, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003).
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.