Court Opinion

ID: 4383024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-02 00:00:16.921576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:42.262323
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-40632      Document: 00514896656         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/01/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-40632
                                                                                 FILED
                                                                              April 1, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

TRAVIS DEAN MCKELROY,

                                                 Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 5:17-CR-899-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

       The attorney appointed to represent Travis McKelroy has moved for

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-40632    Document: 00514896656     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/01/2019

                                 No. 18-40632

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
McKelroy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2