Court Opinion

ID: 9910670
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-17 09:11:36.193937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:49.486406
License: Public Domain

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
December 14, 2023.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                               NO. 14-23-00828-CV

                   IN RE MAGDOLINE ELHINDI, Relator

                         ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
                           WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                              295th District Court
                             Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Cause No. 2023-29085

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On October 31, 2023, relator Magdoline Elhindi filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.
App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna
Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the
following: (1) the trial court’s September 25, 2023 order on defendant’s motion to
compel full and complete discovery responses to defendant’s amended first
response for admission, request for production, and interrogatories with respect to
the compelled production of a video; and (2) the trial court’s October 26, 2023
order on plaintiff’s [relator’s] motion for leave to provide video to the FBI and
defendant’s motion for sanctions with respect to the requirements that relator
provide a full and complete copy of the video to the real party in interest and wait
for confirmation of his receipt before leave is obtained to provide a copy of the
video to the FBI.

      Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                                  PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.

                                         2