Court Opinion

ID: 1024673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:36:59.206937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:26.390925
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Atkins v. Med. Dep’t of Middle River Reg’l Jail,
  
  No. 7:06-cv-00636-GEC, 2007 WL 2029304 (W.D.Va. July 10, 2007). Atkins’ motions
   
   *559
   
  for appointment of counsel, for trial by jury, and for a new trial and for judgment as a matter of law, and his request to reargue are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED