Court Opinion

ID: 4696109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-16 18:00:39.456208+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:38.845783
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-10877     Document: 00515902343         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/16/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                                                      FILED
                                                                  June 16, 2021
                                  No. 19-10877                   Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                    Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jason Jaime,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-34

   Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jason Jaime has moved for leave
   to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
   U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Jaime has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10877     Document: 00515902343          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/16/2021

                                   No. 19-10877

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2