Court Opinion

ID: 4142475
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 03:22:21.801242+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:41.722056
License: Public Domain

m ATT®HRNEY GENERAL
OIF TEXAS

 

Ath'rxN, TExAs

 

Amnm (II'ZHHR.\I .

mach 3. h". marcum
E:lc¢¢uMw Bi.mtor

mate hyman or Puhl$.c much
wtin, 'i‘m¢

D¢ar airs_ opinion Hd. 0~38?9-A
fm conflict or our opinion No.
0-38?9 with the provisim or
'Bouu 3111 291, h?th raglan-
t\il.'°¢

`¥on hurt requested she opinion orr thin deputllmt
on the question waiver our opinion ’Ho. 0-38?9, relating to
the nathan-it et the state wmut of Puhli¢ valium to
smlmnt nunn et ita employua twa funds lllo-
cited to it t tim rental social Seaurity Basrd, canton
;i.;h utu pr aim of Eouo¢ 311 291, ms 1931_, h?th'hg$.n-

uru.

. fn laid qptnien.ud hcfa east the Etats norer%¢»nt
et ruvaio waltar¢,.£n.naxnznin&ag a karas system in aojr:: -
tina nick th¢‘ri£¢vaz.cus¢rnn¢o$, ban the authnr;if to
mun md ` j plant tha calvin er its du n find
ny ann ga \'\ ¢pyrarr£¢tion,hill, by §h¢.ua» tulsa allo-
e¢to: to said apartment by mm rental 'Secl.,ul wmw

Thn'onlglgcrtionz ux said Bomn¢ 3111 291 union 10
think night pont bd mama n being in conflict with
laid opinion in n cousin

"Elation l._ ‘!’ho salaries at 1111 amato atti-
a¢r¢ mt all mass _ nn exoqu those don-
stiteslonnl¢@s¢t¢ art ours w§oo¢ salarion nrs
apacit&ull: fixed by mo Gom't!.wtiau- and smart
the admin a the wiener wages ana other
, union of Mstrist indus shall de, for th
_ ed denman depended 1, 19|..1, and ending
august 31, 1943, in cash am or names n m
ve proud-sa for by tva mgicla+.nr¢ in the general
“PWW‘MQR bill-sc a ¢ 0

*H¢d. 3. All_l¢¢u and purse at laws fixing
the salaries or all Btsto o£f£earu in# caploguas,
except thuna conovitatienll B$¢t¢ officers v nos
salaries are apaeiti¢lllx fizn&.b the Consv£tu»
tied had manage tva salarigo at s nintriat '
Judg¢s ¢n¢ sever c¢m§enaatian at ziasr£¢t Juég»a
are hereby spectriqal -ropngl»d in so far us
many are in aontliat ah this nzt. . . .*

giglio \.‘-`¢ -¢.El wmom’ PU 2

H\n the above quoted provisions or Howsa Bi.ll 291

s` connelly recognize tva validity or general appropriation '
'b§llm, and lme¢d, give them pr¢ud»noe over other note d

the ‘.Leginllturo in the matters indicatod. and our opinion Ho.
0-38?9 was mounted u¥oa the vision at france B£Lll 423,
acts 19&1 h?t.h begins uro, nn oh 1a a general appropriation
bill, asking appropriations for the exocut;ive and administra-
tive departmnts of the man gonrm¢nt, from iadjuf.qnt con-
cral'o department to mate Bourd ct '~"'~‘ater ‘Englnura. W¢ ho-
liev¢ the oonclucion rameth in that opinion is carmack

 

lt is therefore our opinion thst\¢am'opmm Ho.
0- 879 1a not in conflict with thc provisions ct Houn 3111
29 , mata of the h?th uglalawr¢_.
" '!ours very truly
RTT¢.'RNE".Y Gm‘i ,51. 01? TEIAS
By /¢/ § .R. Allcn
'“: R. dillon

. _ animus
WA¢GO:J$¥

APFHM m 135 1913 : ' _

/s/ wald 8. ibm

m¢.’&t!§f!‘ G»m 0? m3 AI’FRQVD QI‘I!!IOB tim
j_ `- . B¥-m, whitman