Court Opinion

ID: 8672075
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 23:49:50.942512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:21.443229
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Victor Manuel Huizar-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to terminate and ordering him removed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of citizenship. Solis-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1090, 1092 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
Contrary to Huizar-Perez’s contention, the record before us presents no genuine issue of material fact requiring us to transfer this petition for review to district court for a hearing on Huizar-Perez’s claimed derivative United States citizenship. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(A) (where court of appeals determines from the record that no genuine issue of material fact about petitioner’s nationality is presented, court shall decide the claim).
Huizar-Perez’s Mexican birth certificate provides evidence of his foreign birth, gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of alienage, and shifts the burden of proof to Huizar-Perez to establish derivative U.S. citizenship by a preponderance of the evidence. See Scales v. INS, 232 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2000). We agree with the agency’s assessment of the record evidence, and conclude that Huizar-Perez failed to meet his evidentiary burden.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.