Court Opinion

ID: 993466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:08:14.118645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:33.201783
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7209

WILLIS R. STOLLINGS,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM DUNCIL, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-446-2)

Submitted:   October 31, 1997          Decided:     November 12, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willis R. Stollings, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.,
Victor Shawn Woods, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston,
West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. Stollings v. Duncil, No. CA-97-446-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug.
13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2