Court Opinion

ID: 9893127
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-25 21:00:59.714307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:42.733040
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6666      Doc: 14         Filed: 10/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-6666

        JEFFREY SCOTT ADKINS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        TONYA D. CHAPMAN, in her capacity as chair of the Virginia Parole Board;
        REVEREND A. LINCOLN JAMES, in their capacity as a member of the Virginia
        Parole Board; KEMBA SMITH PRADIA, in their capacity as a member of the
        Virginia Parole Board; SHERMAN P. LEA, SR., in their capacity as a member of
        the Virginia Parole Board,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01061-LMB-JFA)

        Submitted: October 19, 2023                                   Decided: October 24, 2023

        Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Jeffrey Scott Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6666      Doc: 14         Filed: 10/24/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Jeffrey Scott Adkins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment

        to Defendants in Adkins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his procedural due

        process rights in connection with the Virginia Parole Board’s denial of parole. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

        order. Adkins v. Chapman, No. 1:21-cv-01061-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 1, 2033). We

        dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2