Court Opinion

ID: 4084105
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-07 23:51:14.634953+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:05:44.273220
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1076
KA 12-01589
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

                      V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAMUEL L. RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WAGNER & HART, LLP, OLEAN (JANINE C. FODOR OF COUNSEL), FOR
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.

     Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M.
Himelein, J.), rendered August 13, 2012. The judgment convicted
defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree
and robbery in the second degree.

     It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed.

     Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him
upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law §
140.30 [2]) and robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [1]). Contrary
to defendant’s contention, we conclude that he knowingly,
intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see
generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831,
833). The challenge by defendant to County Court’s suppression ruling
is encompassed by that valid waiver of the right to appeal (see Kemp,
94 NY2d at 833; People v Goossens, 92 AD3d 1282, 1283, lv denied 19
NY3d 960).

Entered:    November 8, 2013                       Frances E. Cafarell
                                                   Clerk of the Court