Court Opinion

ID: 9477669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 06:28:26.908419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:45:59.204795
License: Public Domain

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
Appellees, in their application for rehearing, assert that they raised defenses in the district court which were not reached by the court. Specifically, appellees argue that the suretyship agreement was incomplete and failed to adequately identify the obligation to be guaranteed. We agree with appellees that the district court should have an. opportunity to rule on these defenses if they were properly and timely presented. Accordingly, the district court on remand should on any defenses properly asserted by appellees that the court did not reach.
Except as stated above, the application for rehearing is DENIED.