Court Opinion

ID: 9879434
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 18:15:50.812109+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:53.494998
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM: Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. and 5Th Cir, R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. In the poll, 5 judges vote in favor of rehearing en banc, and 9 vote against. Voting in favor are Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, and Owen. Voting against are Chief Judge Stewart, Dennis, Prado, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higgin-son, and Costa.