Court Opinion

ID: 3120971
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:00:32.094296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:38:47.651753
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                          SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                               FORT WORTH

                              NO. 02-11-00396-CV

MELCHOR JESUS B. ACOSTA,                                             APPELLANT
M.D.

                                        V.

GINA KAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS                                        APPELLEES
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
ESTATE OF TAMSEY LYNORA
MOORE, DECEASED

                                    ------------

          FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                    ------------

             MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
                                    ------------

      We have considered the parties= AJoint Motion To Dismiss,@ requesting

that we render judgment to effectuate their settlement agreement, abate this

case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate the settlement agreement are

complete, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in

      1
       See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
accordance with the parties’ agreement. It is the court=s opinion that the motion

should be granted in part and denied in part.2 Accordingly, without regard to the

merits, we set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d); Innovative Office Sys.,

Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

      Appellant’s request that this appeal be joined with appellate cause number

02-11-00365-CV, styled TRISUN Healthcare, LLC d/b/a The Plaza At Mansfield

v. Gina Kay, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Tamsey Lynora

Moore, Deceased, is dismissed as moot. All other requested relief is denied.

      Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                                   PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 3, 2011

      2
        That is, the parties ask us to render judgment effectuating the parties=
agreement and to abate this case until the trial court’s proceedings to effectuate
this settlement agreement are complete and to remand this case to the trial court
for rendition of judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B), (C). Rule
42.1(a)(2), however, permits us to render judgment effectuating the parties=
agreement or to set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the
trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement or to abate
the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement;
we cannot do all three or portions of all three. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A),
(B); see also Cunningham v. Cunningham, No. 02-08-00362-CV, 2008 WL
5479677, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Oct. 30, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.).

                                      2