Court Opinion

ID: 2281284
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:58:23.214309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:25:45.770713
License: Public Domain

326 S.W.3d 553 (2010)
Stephen W. SELL, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94714.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
November 23, 2010.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Stephen W. Sell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).