Court Opinion

ID: 2355879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 09:13:45.456499+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:28:48.322192
License: Public Domain

946 A.2d 638 (2008)
JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES, Respondent
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner.
No. 144 WAL 2007.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 3, 2008.

AMENDED ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding that an administrative agency's notice that clearly advises the recipient of the effective date of the agency's action, but that does not specifically designate a "date of mailing," is insufficient to begin the appeal period? If the notice is sufficient, is the recipient entitled to an appeal nunc pro tunc?