Court Opinion

ID: 9941769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 21:03:59.917286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:02.905029
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                       Case No. 5D22-2838
                 LT Case Nos. 2012-CF-001240-A
                              2022-CF-000079-A
                 _____________________________

DARYL LEE VELTMAN,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County.
Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Robert J. Pearce, III,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A.
Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                       February 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.
     In this Anders* appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation
and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Veltman. Because
the record does not include a written revocation order that
identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial
court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order
that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Veltman
was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Font v. State,
299 So. 3d 627, 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020); Burnem v. State, 279 So.
3d 1275, 1275−76 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

    AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, WALLIS, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

    * Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

                                 2