Court Opinion

ID: 9382187
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-24 21:01:53.885457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:37.617993
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2298      Doc: 27          Filed: 03/23/2023   Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-2298

        DORA L. ADKINS,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        ASHFORD TRS ALEXANDRIA, LLC,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00790-PTG-WEF)

        Submitted: March 21, 2023                                         Decided: March 23, 2023

        Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2298      Doc: 27         Filed: 03/23/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of

        the magistrate judge, denying her requests for leave to file an emergency complaint and for

        leave to proceed on that complaint in forma pauperis, and dismissing her case. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Adkins’ motions

        for leave to amend her informal opening brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the

        district court. Adkins v. Ashford TRS Alexandria, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-00790-PTG-WEF

        (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2022). We deny Adkins’ motions to reverse and remand, for leave to

        reverse and remand, for leave to vacate and remand, to replace, for leave to replace, to

        amend, for leave to amend, and for leave to amend and moot all other motions.

        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

        presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

        process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2