Court Opinion

ID: 4179188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-20 18:04:05.974179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:23.010416
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-41367      Document: 00514040318         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/20/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 16-41367
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      June 20, 2017
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                     Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ, also known as Felepe Martinez, also
known as Victor Ferrar, also known as Victor Ferrar-Cid, also known as Felipe
Martinez, also known as Manuel Rodriguez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:16-CR-753-1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Rodriguez-
Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-41367    Document: 00514040318     Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/20/2017

                                 No. 16-41367

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2