Court Opinion

ID: 3501201
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:08:10.95937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:16:04.717104
License: Public Domain

I concur. The statute now in force clearly intends application of the doctrine of cy pres.
It was said in the Appeal of Hannan, 227 Mich. 569, 577:
"The intent of the testator to devote the residue of his estate to charitable purposes is so plain and the terms of the will so positive against any other result that it would avail plaintiff nothing to succeed in eliminating the designated legatee. We find no occasion, however, to resort to the doctrine of cy pres, but would, if necessary, unhesitatingly do so, for the residuum was devoted to charitable purposes and this most effectually cut the same off from any distribution as intestate property. If the particular charity designated to take be held to have lost right to do so, all charities of like character are not thereby eliminated and the purpose of the testator defeated." *Page 326