Court Opinion

ID: 2844472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-03 18:53:56.737752+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:51.765513
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

NO. 
2-03-333-CR

MICHAEL EDWIN MIETH                                                         APPELLANT 
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                  STATE 
 
------------
 
FROM THE 
211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

------------
        After pleading not guilty, Appellant Michael Edwin Mieth (“Mieth”) was
convicted of driving while intoxicated.  Mieth pleaded true to the enhancement
paragraph and a jury assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’
confinement.  The trial court signed a judgment on June 11, 2003.  Mieth did
not file a motion for new trial, so his notice of appeal was due on July 11,
2003. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Mieth filed his notice of appeal on July 22,
2003; thus, it was untimely.
        On August 26, 2003, we sent Mieth a letter explaining our concern that
we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal and informing him that the appeal would
be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue
the appeal filed on or before September 5, 2003, a response showing grounds
for continuation of the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  On September 2,
2003, Mieth responded that he was on suicide watch from June 10, 2003 to
July 14, 2003, for trying to take his life after the jury returned its verdict and
was not allowed paper or pen during that time period.
        The rules of appellate procedure set out rules that must be followed in
order to invoke this court’s jurisdiction over an appeal.  White v. State, 61
S.W.3d 424, 427-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).  If the jurisdiction of a court of
appeals is not properly invoked, the power of the appellate court to act is as
absent as if it did not exist.  Id. at 428.  Appellate jurisdiction is invoked by
giving timely and proper notice of appeal.  Id. 
        Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on or before July 11, 2003.  We
may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after the
filing deadline, the appellant files a notice of appeal with the trial court and files
in this court a motion complying with rule 10.5(b).  Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
26.3.  Appellant did not file a motion to extend the time to file his notice of
appeal.  Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal.  See Slaton
v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
        Absent appellate jurisdiction, we have no choice to take any action other
than dismissing the appeal.  See id.; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523, 525
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
 
                                                  PER CURIAM
PANEL D:   WALKER, J; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAY, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P.  47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 25, 2003