Court Opinion

ID: 8680173
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 04:40:02.485696+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:29.737178
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
Counsel retained to represent Frances Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsél is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cie. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.