Court Opinion

ID: 1004094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:24.800271+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:32.591568
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6146

GEORGE D. WILLIAMS,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL T. W. BELL,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-307-5-F)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     George D. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.     See Williams v. Bell, No. CA-00-307-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2