Court Opinion

ID: 2643560
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-11-21 21:39:06.935251+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:30.505022
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-15673     Date Filed: 11/21/2013   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-15673
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

EDDIE LITTLES, III,

                                                               Defendant-Appellant.

                          __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                               (November 21, 2013)

Before MARCUS, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Christopher E. Chapman, appointed counsel for Eddie Littles, III, in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 12-15673     Date Filed: 11/21/2013   Page: 2 of 2

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Littles’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.

                                         2