Court Opinion

ID: 2733003
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-15 22:08:40.421542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:22.203569
License: Public Domain

J-S42025-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                   PENNSYLVANIA
                         Appellee

                    v.

JAMES J. SEVERINO, JR.

                         Appellant               No. 1856 WDA 2013

           Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 23, 2013
             In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
             Criminal Division at No(s): CP-02-SA-0000925-2013

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., JENKINS, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY PANELLA, J.         FILED SEPTEMBER 15, 2014

      I respectfully disagree with my esteemed colleagues in the Majority

suspension was DUI-related.     The Majority notes that the Commonwealth

than admitting into evidence a printout of the JNET records. The Majority

                                                     ssible hearsay.    See

hearsay.    However, Appellant never objected to the testimony.     In the

absence of an objection, the testimony is competent evidence.      I would

affirm the conviction.

Judge Musmanno and Judge Jenkins do not join in dissenting statement.