Court Opinion

ID: 8450248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:56:25.478103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.837966
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward B. Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and dismissing it as an unauthorized, successive motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Wilson, No. l:12-cv-00943-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.