Court Opinion

ID: 8476221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 14:51:56.168167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:25.892339
License: Public Domain

*424Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Tavaughn Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See United States v. Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 243-45 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.