Court Opinion

ID: 992721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:56:46.142228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:31.780659
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 97-6498

BARRETT K. SCOTT,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICIA RAINEY; CHARLIE J. CEPAK; JAMES L.
HARVEY; PARKER EVATT, in their individual and
official capacity,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-95-3103-4-19BE)

Submitted:   July 24, 1997                 Decided:   August 7, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barrett K. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, Michael
Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Rainey, No. CA-95-
3103-4-19BE (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2