Court Opinion

ID: 9412834
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 19:02:49.473439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:40.070767
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        AUG 1 2023
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALON NEIMAN; NIR ABRAHAM LEVY,                  No.    22-15843

                Plaintiffs-Appellants,          D.C. No.
                                                2:21-cv-01824-CDS-NJK
 v.

GAVRIEL BARAZANI; et al.,                       MEMORANDUM*

                Defendants-Appellees.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Nevada
                    Cristina D. Silva, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted July 27, 2023**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

      Appellants Alon Neiman and Nir Abraham Levy appeal pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing their contract and fraud action for lack of

subject-matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review

de novo. Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2014). We affirm.

      The party asserting federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing it.

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). Diversity jurisdiction

requires complete diversity. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996). “Rule

12(b)(1) jurisdictional attacks can be either facial or factual.” White v. Lee, 227 F.3d

1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000).

      Appellants’ jurisdictional theory requires diversity jurisdiction. According to

the complaint, Neiman and Levy are both Nevada citizens. Appellants initially

alleged in the complaint that Barazani is also a resident of Nevada. But later, in

opposition to the motion to dismiss, they alleged that Barazani is a Colorado citizen.

To support the claim of Colorado citizenship, Appellants provided an undated photo

of Barazani allegedly holding a Colorado conditional medical marijuana license for

Aspen Forest, LLC. Appellants argued that recipients of such licenses must be

Colorado citizens. Appellants also alleged that Barazani was served twice in

Colorado and that Barazani was living in Denver to physically manage a dispensary.

      Barazani, in contrast, provided a signed declaration under penalties of perjury

that he had been a permanent resident of Nevada since before the complaint was

filed and had no intention to move elsewhere. He also provided a photo of his

Nevada driver’s license and a photo of a utility bill with a Nevada address for service

around the time the complaint was filed.         Furthermore, Barazani provided a

                                           2
declaration that he had been a member of GII, LLC, now revoked, and was currently

a member of Aspen Forest, LLC.

      The district court properly dismissed Appellants’ action because they failed

to satisfy the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction. First, Appellants’

complaint alleges Barazani is a Nevada resident, which fails to establish diversity of

citizenship.   Second, we agree with the district court that Appellants’ factual

allegations do not establish Barazani’s Colorado residence. Appellants have not

shown that Barazani must have been a Colorado citizen in order to receive a

Colorado conditional medical marijuana license. Also, that Barazani was served

twice in Colorado does not establish domicile; people may travel outside their state

of residence—even for extended periods of time—without affecting their domicile.

Furthermore, Appellants do not dispute that Barazani has a Nevada driver’s license

and a utility bill showing him paying for services in Nevada at the time the complaint

was filed. Finally, Barazani’s Nevada citizenship extends to GII, LLC and Aspen

Forest, LLC, further defeating diversity. See NewGen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840

F.3d 606, 612 (9th Cir. 2016).

      AFFIRMED.

                                          3