Court Opinion

ID: 2861440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 21:29:57.493796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:25:06.934525
License: Public Domain

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="WordPerfect 9">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 14pt"><STRONG><CENTER>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</STRONG></SPAN></CENTER>
</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>
<STRONG><CENTER>NO. 03-9<A NAME="1">7</A>-00<A NAME="2">439</A>-CV</CENTER>
</STRONG>

<P><HR ALIGN="CENTER" WIDTH="26%">
</P>

<STRONG></STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="3">Marilyn Roth</A>, Appellant</CENTER>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER>v.</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><CENTER><A NAME="4">Michael Stephen Williams</A>, Appellee</CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>
<SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <A NAME="5">TRAVIS</A> COUNTY, <A NAME="6">53RD</A> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</CENTER>
</STRONG></SPAN>

<P><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><CENTER>NO. <A NAME="7">373,554</A>, HONORABLE <A NAME="8">MARY PEARL WILLIAMS</A>, JUDGE PRESIDING </STRONG></SPAN><STRONG></CENTER>
</STRONG></P>

<P><STRONG><HR SIZE="3">
</STRONG></P>

PER CURIAM

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Appellant, Marilyn Roth appeals from a judgment of the trial court in favor of
appellee Michael Stephen Williams.  Because appellant has failed to file a brief, we will dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). </P>

<P>	The Clerk of this Court filed the reporter's record in this cause on October 14,
1997.  Accordingly, appellant's brief was due on Thursday, November 13, 1997.  <EM>See</EM> Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a)(2).  By letter dated December 3, 1997, the clerk of this Court notified the parties
that appellant's brief was overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant
tendered a motion for extension of time reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief.  Thus far,
appellant has neither submitted a brief nor a motion for extension of time to file a brief.</P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. 
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). </P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Aboussie and Jones</P>

<P>Dismissed for Want of Prosecution</P>

<P>Filed:   June 4, 1998</P>

<P>Do Not Publish</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>