Court Opinion

ID: 9754691
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 20:09:46.483393+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:27:56.331074
License: Public Domain

SPAETH, President Judge,
concurring:
I agree with the majority that the trial court’s order should be affirmed. However, I find it unnecessary to consider, as the majority considers, see its op. at 11-12 et seq., whether the memorandum signed by the Foundation satisfied the Statute of Frauds. Foundation’s letter was an offer. Target’s letter was a counter-offer because it materially altered the terms of Foundation’s offer; Target is trying to enforce its counter-offer. However, since the counter-offer is not signed by the party to be charged, enforcement of it is precluded by the Statute of Frauds.