Court Opinion

ID: 3190989
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-04 07:04:12.135813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:23:46.084036
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                   March 30, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1234. JAMEEL FREEMAN v. THE STATE.

      In 2000, a jury convicted Jamal Freeman of hijacking a motor vehicle,
aggravated assault, kidnapping, and fleeing from police, and his convictions were
affirmed on appeal. See Carter v. State, 249 Ga. App. 354 (548 SE2d 102) (2001).
In August of 2015, Freeman filed a motion to correct void sentence, arguing that his
indictment was flawed because it was not returned in open court. The trial court
denied the motion, and Freeman filed this notice of appeal. However, we lack
jurisdiction.
      Pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may correct or reduce a sentence
during the year after its imposition, or within 120 days after remittitur following a
direct appeal, whichever is later. Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may
only modify a void sentence. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d
346) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or
correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the
sentence is, in fact, void. Id. “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited
to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which
the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically
because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute
provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Thus,
when a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. See Jones
v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).
      Freeman argues that his indictment was defective. This is not a valid void-
sentence claim. See Rooney v. State, 318 Ga. App. 385, 387 (734 SE2d 104) (2012).
Because Freeman has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim, this appeal is hereby
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                                                            03/30/2016
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.