Court Opinion

ID: 9664677
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:25:28.698634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:08.496890
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In their motion for rehearing the appellants attack our finding that the “evidence supports the finding of the trial court that one of the purposes of establishing pickets at the entrances of ap-pellee’s plant * * * was to compel all production employees of appellee to become members of the union.” We have re-examined the evidence and the briefs of both parties and have concluded that we were in error in making this finding. The evidence does not support the finding of the trial court quoted. It does show that one of the purposes of the union in establishing picket lines was to obtain an agreement on the part of the employer that the union might act as bargaining agent for all of the employees in the production department of the company, that is, to compel the company to recognize it as the exclusive bargaining agent for all production employees of the foundry.
The other matters presented in the appellants’ motion have also been considered and we believe they present no error.
Appellants’ motion that the injunction of the trial court as modified by this court be vacated and dissolved is overruled.