Court Opinion

ID: 4698394
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-24 18:00:35.803237+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:03.337794
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-50824     Document: 00515912455         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/24/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Fifth Circuit

                                                                         FILED
                                                                     June 24, 2021
                                  No. 20-50824
                                                                    Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Marciano Gonzalez-Noriega,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                           USDC No. 3:10-CR-1483-3

   Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Marciano Gonzalez-Noriega has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Noriega has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50824    Document: 00515912455          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/24/2021

                                  No. 20-50824

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2