Court Opinion

ID: 3819370
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:54:49.911425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:31.559484
License: Public Domain

Defendant in error files motion to dismiss for the reason that it does not appear that the original or a copy of the case-made was ever filed in the county court, and because it does not appear that case-made was prepared and served within 15 days after the date of the order appealed from, or within the time fixed by any valid order extending the time in which to prepare and serve same.
It does not appear that the case-made was ever filed in the office of the clerk of the county court, as required *Page 31 
by law. The certificate of the trial judge is attested by the clerk of the court, but the seal of the court is not attached thereto, as required by section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910.
By the provisions of section 5242, supra, it is required that the case, when settled and signed by the judge, shall be attested by the clerk and the seal of the court attached thereto, and it shall then be filed with the papers in the case; and, in the absence of a request for leave to withdraw case-made and file same and have the seal attached thereto, it will be stricken from the files of this court. Stallard et al.v. Knapp, 9 Okla. 591, 60 P. 234; Oligschlager v. Grell,13 Okla. 632, 75 P. 1131; Oklahoma City v. McKean, 39 Okla. 300,135 P. 19; Marple v. Bank, 28 Okla. 810, 115 P. 1124;Abbott v. Rogers, 35 Okla. 189, 128 P. 908; Peck v. Stephens,35 Okla. 468, 130 P. 276; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443,141 P. 779; Canfield v. Bell et al., ante, 149 P. 1088.
The verdict was rendered on the 15th day of September, 1914, motion for a new trial was filed on the 17th day of September, and overruled on the 5th day of October, 1914, upon which day judgment was rendered. The first order of extension was made on the day the verdict was rendered, and no other order allowing an extension of time was made until the 19th day of November, 1914, which was 44 days after the motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment rendered. In the case of Planters'Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rose et al., 27 Okla. 530,112 P. 966, it is held:
"A trial court or judge is without authority to make, before the order or judgment appealed from is rendered, an order extending the time within which to make and serve a case-made." *Page 32 
It thus appears that the order of September 15, 1914, before the motion for a new trial was filed or overruled, and before judgment was rendered, was a nullity, and, 44 days having elapsed from the time the motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment was rendered and the making of the second order of extension on November 19, 1914, the time within which the court or judge thereof could lawfully have made an order extending the time in which to prepare and serve case-made had elapsed, and said second order and all subsequent extensions were void.First Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Okla. Nat. Bank of Shawnee,29 Okla. 411, 118 P. 574; Fife v. Cornelous, 35 Okla. 402,124 P. 957.
It therefore follows that the case-made is a nullity, and same is stricken from the files of this court. The record being certified as a transcript, the case will be retained for the determination of those errors assigned that appear upon the face of the record.
All the Justices concur.