Court Opinion

ID: 9368409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-03 21:06:01.527042+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:08.676871
License: Public Domain

People v Quander (2023 NY Slip Op 00586)

People v Quander

2023 NY Slip Op 00586

Decided on February 3, 2023

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 3, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

958 KA 17-01907

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
vKEVIN M. QUANDER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MARK D. FUNK, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KATHLEEN P. REARDON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LISA GRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

	Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), rendered October 5, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of murder in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree. 
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of murder in the first degree (Penal Law
§ 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]; [b]) and attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15 [3]). As defendant contends and the People correctly concede, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Jackson, 207 AD3d 1077, 1077-1078 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1151 [2022]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: February 3, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court