Court Opinion

ID: 2875996
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 06:41:04.500639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:06.533242
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-09-00499-CR

                                      Loa Santos, Appellant

                                                  v.

                                   The State of Texas, Appellee

  FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
         NO. 86-253-K, HONORABLE WILLIAM S. LOTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               On August 6, 2009, the Clerk received Loa Santos’s pro se motion for out-of-time

appeal in the above Williamson County cause. The motion was filed as a notice of appeal.

               Santos was convicted and sentenced in 1986. Santos concedes that his notice of

appeal is untimely, but he moves to suspend the appellate rules and for an order directing the district

clerk to prepare and forward an appellate record.

               The court of criminal appeals has held that compliance with rule 26 is essential to vest

a court of appeals with jurisdiction, and that courts of appeals may not suspend the requirements of

the rule. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). In

so holding, the court reaffirmed an earlier opinion requiring strict compliance with the rules

regarding perfection of appeals. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App.

1996). Under Slaton and Olivo, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this cause in any manner other
than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. The motions to suspend the rules and to order

preparation of an appellate record are overruled.

               The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                             __________________________________________

                                             J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 1, 2009

Do Not Publish

                                                    2