Court Opinion

ID: 4619517
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-21 02:40:47.877359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:59:57.031063
License: Public Domain

Thomas Campisi v. Commissioner.Campisi v. CommissionerDocket No. 31879.United States Tax Court1951 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23; 10 T.C.M. (CCH) 1151; T.C.M. (RIA) 51366; December 10, 1951*23  When petitioner fails to appear and contest respondent's determination of deficiencies and penalties (other than the penalty under section 293 (b), I.R.C.), as to which petitioner had the burden of proof, such deficiencies and penalties will be affirmed for failure of proof of error. The charge of fraud, as to which respondent had the burden of proof, is sustained on evidence adduced by respondent.  John E. Mahoney, Esq., for the respondent.  VAN FOSSAN Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion The respondent determined deficiencies in income tax, victory tax, and penalties as follows: YearPenaltyPenalty SectionPenalty SectionEndedDeficiencySection 293(b)294(d)(1)(A)294(d)(2)6/30/44$17,767.83$8,883.92$129.01$ 83.686/30/452,048.761,024.38150.88103.46The hearing was held on October 2, 1951, and evidence, consisting of oral testimony and exhibits, was received. The petitioner defaulted and did not appear at the hearing, whereupon the respondent moved to dismiss the proceeding because of the petitioner's failure to prosecute as to all items on which petitioner had the burden*24  of proof, and that an order be entered for deficiencies in income tax, victory tax and penalties as follows: YearPenalty SectionPenaltyEndedDeficiency294(d)(1)(A)Section 294(d)(2)6/30/44$17,767.83$129.01$ 83.686/30/452,048.76150.88103.46The respondent, on whom rested the burden of proof as to fraud, proceeded with the introduction of evidence to sustain the charge of fraud. Findings of Fact Petitioner is an individual with residence at Newark, New Jersey. The returns for the periods here involved were filed with the collector of internal revenue for the fifth district of New Jersey. On March 9, 1939, the petitioner was sentenced to a term of three years and a $1,000 fine on the criminal charge of removal of untaxed liquor. The petitioner commenced serving his sentence on January 2, 1940, and was paroled on April 22, 1941. From April 22, 1941 until January 26, 1944, the petitioner was under the constant jurisdiction and supervision of the United States Probation Officer. During the period of the petitioner's parole, he made monthly signed reports and those signed reports contained statements of the amounts of his income. *25  Within two weeks of the incarceration of the petitioner, and on January 15, 1940, petitioner's wife, Christine Campisi, applied for relief to the Board of Children's Guardians of the State of New Jersey (now the State Board of Child Welfare for the State of New Jersey), to support their four children. At that time, the petitioner's wife, under oath, declared that she and the petitioner had no assets or funds. This relief organization paid Christine Campisi $55 per month until April, 1941, when relief was revoked because the petitioner was released from prison. Thereafter, and until January, 1944, the petitioner, in his signed monthly reports to the probation officer, declared that he had no bank accounts, postal savings, building and loan accounts or any assets other than the wages he earned. In his report for June, 1941, he stated that he borrowed from Madeline Delapela the sum of $350 and from his mother, the sum of $300. In his report for March, 1942, the petitioner stated that he had borrowed $300. In his statement for June, 1942, the petitioner stated that he had borrowed $700. In his statement in the report dated March 1, 1943, petitioner stated that he borrowed $300 to pay*26  for doctor bills, children's clothing, and to repair his truck. The petitioner borrowed on insurance policies issued by the Prudential Insurance Company of America the sum of $107 on May 24, 1941, which was repaid in installments, the final one being made February 3, 1943, and the sum of $183.88 on February 3, 1943, which was not repaid in installment payments until January 21, 1944. On February 12, 1943, the petitioner, in an endeavor to compromise his fine of $1,000 for $200, stated under oath in an affidavit to the Department of Justice, his financial condition as follows Assets1 truck and milk route purchased for$1,000(no value given at time of affidavit)Cash225$1,225LiabilitiesChattel mortgage on truck and business$ 600Owed Prudential Life Insurance Co.181Owed his mother, Mrs. Fortunata200$ 981 He also stated that his monthly rent was $55, with earnings of $60 to $65 per week, which were used to support his family. The above represented all the assets of whatever kind, owned by him or held in trust for him. The petitioner stated in his signed monthly statements to the probation officer that he earned the following: 1941December$ 2071942January$ 251February302March400April313May368June318Total Earnings Fiscal YearEnded June 30, 1942$2,159July283August280September263October305November272December272Total Earnings in 1942$3,6271943January$ 243February248March280April252May268June272Total Earnings Fiscal YearEnded June 30, 1943$3,238July268August289September278October287November288December312Total Earnings in 1943$3,2851944January$ 210Total Earnings Reported (un-complete) for Fiscal YearEnded June 30, 1944$1,932*27  The first income tax return ever filed by the petitioner was for the period July 1, 1942 to June 30, 1943, wherein he showed a net profit from the milk, cheese and oil business in the amount of $3,448.90. He also reported income of $2,500 as "Commissions on sales of volume". These items totaled $5,948.90. On April 28, 1941, the petitioner, in answering questions as to his financial status for the Selective Service System Local Board No. 37, Essex County, stated that his family was on relief and that he owned no property either for himself or in trust for him. During the taxable year July 1, 1943 to June 30, 1944, the petitioner purchased the following real properties for cash: 5 Stanley Road, South Orange, N.J…. $12,000 293-5 - 14th Avenue, Newark, N.J…. 22,500 In 1944, but prior to the time the petitioner purchased his residence at 5 Stanley Road, South Orange, New Jersey, on February 28, 1944, the petitioner advanced to his sister, Providenzia Campisi, the sum of between $3,500 and $3,700 to be used for the purchase of property located at 156 Hunterdon Street, Newark, New Jersey. In the taxable year ending June 30, 1944, the petitioner's bank account in the West*28  Side Trust Co. of Newark, New Jersey, increased $1,203.88.  In the taxable year ending June 30, 1944, the petitioner's bank account in the Howard Savings Institution of Newark, New Jersey, increased $500. During the taxable year ending June 30, 1944, the petitioner purchased United States Savings Bonds of a face value of $550, which cost him $412.50. The petitioner's living expenses during the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, were $5,000. Prior to the commencement of the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, and more particularly from January 1, 1940 until February 12, 1943, the petitioner and his wife, Christine, had no assets, or property free from debt. They were in debt and their net worth prior to the commencement of such taxable year, i.e., July 1, 1943, was zero. Prior to the commencement of the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, the wife of the petitioner, Christine Campisi, had no assets or monies, or earnings whatsoever, and any assets or monies acquired by her were derived and obtained from her husband, the petitioner. During the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, the assets acquired, net increase in liabilities, and the increase in net worth or additional profits*29  from petitioner's business were as follows: Total increase in assets during thefiscal year ended June 30, 1944$40,216.38Net increase in liabilities during thefiscal year ended June 30, 19444,200.00Increase in net worth for the fiscalyear ended June 30, 194436,016.38Estimated living expenses5,000.00Total income for the year as adjusted41,016.38Less other income3,900.00Net profit from business as adjusted37,116.38Net profit from business per return4,828.45Additional net profit from business$ 32,287.93For the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, the petitioner filed an individual income tax return whereby he reported a net profit from business of $4,828.45 and other income from "Commissions on sales for volume" of $3,900, and an income tax net income of $8,578.45 and a victory tax net income in the amount of $8,728.45. The petitioner understated the amount of his net income for the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, by reason of his failure to report in his income tax return additional net profit from business in the amount of $32,287.93 realized by him duringthe year. The petitioner realized an income tax net income in the amount*30  of $40,866.38 and a victory tax net income in the amount of $41,016.38 for the taxable year ended June 30, 1944. During the taxable year July 1, 1944 to June 30, 1945, the petitioner made and paid for the following real estate improvements: 5 Stanley Road, South Orange, N.J.$7,361.59293-5 - 14th Avenue, Newark, N.J.2,889.73During the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, the petitioner's bank balance in the Fidelity Union Trust Co. of Newark, New Jersey, increased $2,280.15. During the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, the petitioner's bank balance in the Howard Savings Institution of Newark, New Jersey, increased $505.64. During the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, the petitioner invested $1,275 in the American Machine Buttonhole Co. of 501 15th Avenue, Newark, New Jersey. The petitioner's living expenses during the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, were $5,000. During the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, the assets acquired, net increase in liabilities, the amount of income reported and the increase in net worth or additional profits from petitioner's business were as follows: Net increase in assets during the fiscalyear ended June 30, 1945$11,112.44Net increase in liabilities during thefiscal year ended June 30, 1945300.00Increase in net worth for the fiscal yearended June 30, 194510,812.44Estimated living expenses5,000.00Total income for the year as adjusted15,812.44Less other income2,700.00Net profit from business as adjusted13,112.44Net profit from business per return7,585.88Additional net profit from business$ 5,526.56*31  For the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, the petitioner filed an individual income tax return whereby he reported a net profit from business of $7,585.88 and other income from "Commissions" of $2,700 totaling $10,285.88, and a net income in the amount of $9,785.88.  During both the taxable years here involved the petitioner failed to keep any books or records other than his bank account in the Fidelity Union Trust Company. The petitioner understated the amount of his net income for the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, by reason of his failure to report in his income tax return additional net profit from business in the amount of $5,526.56 realized by him during such year. The petitioner realized a net income in the amount of $15,312.44 for the taxable year ended June 30, 1945. The income tax returns for the taxable years ended June 30, 1944, and June 30, 1945, were false and fraudulent in that the petitioner knowingly and wilfully and with fraudulent purpose and intent to evade taxes in the preparation and filing of each of the returns, understated his income for those years by failing to report the amount of $32,287.93 and $5,526.56, respectively. The deficiencies in*32  income tax and victory tax for the taxable year ended June 30, 1944, i.e., $17,767.83, and in income tax for the taxable year ended June 30, 1945, i.e., $2,048.76, are due in whole or in part to fraud with intent on the part of the petitioner to evade and defeat taxes. Opinion VAN FOSSAN, Judge: The burden of proof of error in respondent's action in determining deficiencies rests on the petitioner who challenges them. Since petitioner did not appear at the hearing of this case, and no evidence was offered in any way questioning the correctness of respondent's determination of the deficiencies, the presumption of correctness accorded to his action ripens into a conclusive presumption and judgment must be given to the Government, here represented by respondent, for such deficiencies. The same is true of the penalties, excepting only the 50 per cent penalty for fraud, and judgment for such penalties must accordingly be given to respondent. Not so as to the charge of fraud. Under the statute, the burden of proof of the existence of fraud is placed on the Government. Respondent accordingly proceeded with the proof and established the facts found above. The ultimate findings above*33  to the effect that petitioner filed false nad fraudulent returns with intent to evade taxes are dispositive of the matter and lead to a conclusion that respondent must be sustained in all respects, both as to the deficiencies and all penalties. Decision will be entered for the respondent.