Court Opinion

ID: 4270307
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-26 15:43:56.789951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:26:48.641563
License: Public Domain

Matter of Dallas v Annucci (2018 NY Slip Op 02859)

Matter of Dallas v Annucci

2018 NY Slip Op 02859

Decided on April 26, 2018

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 26, 2018

525417

[*1]In the Matter of JAMES DALLAS, Petitioner,
vANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: March 2, 2018

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

James D. Dallas, Romulus, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. We note that the one-month loss of good time imposed as part of the penalty should also be restored to petitioner (see Matter of Guillebeaux v Annucci, 156 AD3d 1001, 1001 [2017]). Otherwise, given that
petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Brown v Annucci, 157 AD3d 1182, 1182 [2018]; Matter of Wallace v Annucci, 157 AD3d 1171, 1171 [2018]). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $50 and he has requested a refund thereof, we grant such request for reimbursement in that amount.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $50.