Court Opinion

ID: 711472
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 06:33:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:29.407141
License: Public Domain

74 F.3d 1234NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Milton Mark SMITH, a/k/a Pete, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-6793.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 12, 1995.Decided Jan. 16, 1996.

Milton Mark Smith, Appellant Pro Se.  Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Smith, Nos.  CR-90-195-G;  CA-94-521-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 1995).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED