Court Opinion

ID: 9518975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 01:06:04.270669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:45.229970
License: Public Domain

KALITOWSKI, Judge
(concurring in part, dissenting in part)
I concur with the determination that under these facts the state motor carrier tariff schedules are preempted by federal law. Because the district court found the state tariffs were controlling, it did not address issues raised regarding the existence and terns of a contract between the parties. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the decision to address these issues rather than remand them for initial consideration by the district court. See Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580, 582 (Minn.1988) (reviewing court will generally only consider matters presented and considered by district court).