Court Opinion

ID: 9945474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-27 21:01:08.921989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:33.733280
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1994      Doc: 14         Filed: 02/26/2024    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 23-1994

        DANA V. WILCOX,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        HONORABLE RAE OLIVER DAVIS, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Dept.
        of H.U.D.; ALANNA MCCARGO, President, Ginnie Mae; STEWART M.
        SPETTEL, Director, Office of Security Operations; JULIA BRAITHWAITE, Chief
        Compliance Officer, Bank of New York Mellon; JACQUELINE JOYSTON-
        BECHAL, Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer, Bank of New York Mellon;
        ANTHONY R. MANCUSO, Vice President, Bank of New York Mellon,

                            Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01240-PTG-JFA)

        Submitted: February 22, 2024                                 Decided: February 26, 2024

        Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Dana V. Wilcox, Appellant Pro Se. Yuri S. Fuchs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
        ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Kathryn Margaret Barber, Juliet B. Clark,
        MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1994      Doc: 14         Filed: 02/26/2024     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Dana V. Wilcox appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to

        dismiss Wilcox’s claims alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a

        to 77aa; the Securities Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a to 78rr; and the Racketeer Influenced

        and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968. We have reviewed

        the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

        Wilcox v. Davis, No. 1:22-cv-01240-PTG-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2023). We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      AFFIRMED

                                                    2