Court Opinion

ID: 6142008
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-05 14:41:09.476765+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:54:41.189179
License: Public Domain

The Surrogate.
By the seventh clause of her will, this testatrix bequeathed a certain share of her residuary estate to her grandchildren Rosalie and Sarah, infants, the children of her son Solomon.
“ And I hereby appoint my said son Solomon,” the will says, “ guardian of the said estate of his said children :.....said Solomon is not to be required to give any bond or security in the matter of said guar*215dianship, and he is hereby authorized to expend such portion of the principal, interest, income, rents, issues or profits of their said estate, in the care, education and maintenance of said children as to him may seem advisable.”
A legacy bequeathed directly to an infant must, if it exceeds $50 in value, be paid to its general guardian, and such guardian, before he can claim the legacy, must (except in a case where, in pursuance of § 2746 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Surrogate has relieved him) furnish the bond required by that section (see amendment, L. 1886, ch. 358 ; and McLoskey v. Reid, 4 Bradf., 334; Rieck v. Fish, 1 Dem., 79; Matter of Moody, 2 id., 624; Toler v. Landon, 3 id., 337).
Now the infants, in behalf of whom this application is made, have no general guardian. The testatrix has attempted, by her will to constitute their father the guardian of their estates. This she was unable to do in law. The power of appointing the guardian of an infant can only be exercised by the courts having authority in such cases, or by the infant’s father or mother (Fullerton v. Jackson, 5 Johns. Ch., 278; Hoyt v. Hilton, 2 Edw. Ch., 202; R. S., part 2, ch. 8, tit. 3, § 1; 3 Banks, 7th ed., 2346).
I am disposed, however, to think that the provision above quoted from the will, though abortive as an appointment of a guardian, has in effect made this petitioner a trustee of the property bequeathed to his children; and that that property may properly be turned over to him without his obtaining letters of guardianship. But in view of the fact that less than a year has elapsed since the executor received his let*216ters testamentary, he cannot be directed to pay the legacies in question except upon the filing of a bond as prescribed in such cases by § 2I719 of the Code of Civil Procedure.