Court Opinion

ID: 609030
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:25:45+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:48.841071
License: Public Domain

995 F.2d 1063
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Charles J. HUGHEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.George HAMPTON, Warden;  South Carolina Department ofCorrections;  Attorney General of the State ofSouth Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6072.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  April 21, 1993.Decided:  June 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-92-685-3-17)
Charles J. Hughey, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Charles J. Hughey seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal.  Hughey v. Hampton, No. CA-92-685-3-17 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1993).  We deny Hughey's Motion to Vacate Sentence filed in this Court.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED