Court Opinion

ID: 4108668
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-12-19 22:01:16.2194+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:09.048313
License: Public Domain

FILED
                           NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              DEC 19 2016

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

                            FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No.   15-10484

              Plaintiff-Appellee,                D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01428-RCC

 v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
AVERY JOSEPH HENDRICKS,

              Defendant-Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Arizona
                     Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

                          Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before:      WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

      Avery Joseph Hendricks appeals from the revocation of probation and

25-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hendricks’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
provided Hendricks the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence.

      We remand the case to the district court with instructions to correct the

judgment to reflect that Hendricks admitted Allegations A and C, not Allegation B.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

                                          2                                   15-10484