Court Opinion

ID: 9353155
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-11 01:00:26.736023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:07:57.836445
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40486         Document: 00516605419             Page: 1      Date Filed: 01/10/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                        Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                    FILED
                                                                                January 10, 2023
                                       No. 22-40486                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar                                 Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                      Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Armando Serrato-Medrano,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 7:22-CR-282-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando
   Serrato-Medrano has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Serrato-Medrano has not filed a response.
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40486    Document: 00516605419         Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/10/2023

                                 No. 22-40486

   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2