Court Opinion

ID: 1004662
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:44:25.35002+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:27.019382
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6489

NELSON BRADLEY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DOUGLAS VARGO; ALPHONSO HICKS; MARVIN LEE;
DAVID GARRAGHTY,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-99-1230-2)

Submitted:   May 31, 2001                  Decided:   June 11, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelson Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant At-
torney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Nelson Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    Bradley v. Vargo, No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 26, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2