Court Opinion

ID: 3075556
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:11:56.25414+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:03:06.164712
License: Public Domain

In The

                               Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                           ____________________
                              NO. 09-12-00532-CR
                              NO. 09-12-00533-CR
                           ____________________

     WILBUR BRANDON NIXON A/K/A WILBUR NIXON, Appellant

                                        V.

                       THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________            ______________

                   On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                           Jefferson County, Texas
                   Trial Cause Nos. 11-12114 and 11-13031
________________________________________________________            _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Under a plea bargain for burglary of a habitation and “violation of a

protective order with previous convictions[,]” the trial court deferred adjudication

of guilt in each case and placed Wilbur Nixon on community supervision.

      The trial court subsequently determined that Nixon violated the terms of his

community supervision, and the court adjudicated his guilt. The trial court

sentenced him to twenty years of confinement for the offense of burglary of a

                                         1
habitation and ten years of confinement for the offense of violation of a protective

order with previous convictions. The sentences run consecutively.

      Nixon’s appellate counsel filed a brief in each case that presents counsel’s

professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes that there are no arguable

grounds for appeal in either case. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978). Nixon filed a response. We have reviewed the appellate records and agree

with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal in either cause.

Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial

court’s judgments are affirmed.

      AFFIRMED.

                                             ________________________________
                                                     DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                           Justice

Submitted on June 26, 2013
Opinion Delivered August 28, 2013
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

                                         2