Court Opinion

ID: 2926757
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:37:48.814111+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:27.970679
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-08-00683-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

ROBERT BECHO,	Appellant,

v.

ARACELI RAMIREZ,								  Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss this
appeal.  According to the motion, the parties have remarried and reached an agreement
to settle and compromise their differences.  They ask this Court to render judgment
effectuating the parties' agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).  
	The parties have agreed that appellee confesses error in the judgment below of the
trial court's grant of a permanent injunction against appellant; that appellee confesses error
in the judgment below of the trial court's order that appellant owes retroactive child support;
that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for a permanent injunction;
and that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for retroactive child
support.  The parties' remarriage renders moot the issues concerning conservatorship,
possession, and access.  
	We GRANT the joint motion to dismiss.  We RENDER judgment effectuating the
parties' settlement agreement, and DISMISS the appeal.  In accordance with the
agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d).
									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 2nd day of July, 2009.