Court Opinion

ID: 2991532
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 03:57:43.579309+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:04.495258
License: Public Domain

Dismissed and
Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2011.
 
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-11-00735-CR
____________
 
CORDELL HINES, Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 
 

On Appeal from the 230th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1278982
 
 
 

M E M O R
A N D U M   O P I N I O N
            Appellant entered a guilty plea to murder. On July 11, 2011,
the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-eight years in
the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. No
timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was
not filed until August 16, 2011.
            A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days
after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new
trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies
with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with
jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.
1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain
jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it
can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Appellant's notice of appeal was due August 10, 2011. The
record reflects appellant executed his notice of appeal “8–11–11.” The envelope
is postmarked August 12, 2011. Even if we considered these dates, none are
timely.
Although the date of filing is within fifteen days after the
deadline, no motion for extension of time was filed. See
Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. In a criminal case, a late notice of appeal will not invoke our
jurisdiction unless a motion for extension of time is also
filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal. Olivo v. State,
918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App.1996).
            Accordingly, the appeal
is ordered dismissed.
 
                                                                        PER
CURIAM
 
 
Panel consists of Justices
Frost, Seymore and Jamison.
Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).