Court Opinion

ID: 616390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-10-31 17:10:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:50:37.107374
License: Public Domain

Case: 11-60263     Document: 00511649677         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/31/2011

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 31, 2011
                                     No. 11-60263
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

ANDRES O. GARCIA-MEZA, also known as Enrique Mesa-Orlando, also known
as Jose Garcia, also known as Jose Meza-Orlando,

                                                  Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                  Respondent

                        Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                BIA No. A077 182 047

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        Andres O. Garcia-Meza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’s (BIA) determination that he is not entitled to deferral of removal
under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Garcia-Meza contends that he
will be tortured if he returns to Honduras because he is a homosexual and was
a gang member. The respondent moves for summary affirmance.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
   Case: 11-60263     Document: 00511649677         Page: 2    Date Filed: 10/31/2011

                                     No. 11-60263

      The conclusion that an alien is not eligible for relief under the CAT is a
factual finding reviewed for substantial evidence. Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d
339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). For a petitioner to be entitled to deferral of removal
under the CAT, he or she must show that “it is more likely than not that he or
she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R.
§ 1208.16(c)(2). “Torture is defined as any act by which severe pain or suffering
. . . is intentionally inflicted on a person . . . by or at the instigation of or with the
consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official
capacity.” Id. § 1208.18(a)(1). “Thus relief under the [CAT] requires a two part
analysis-first, is it more likely than not that the alien will be tortured upon
return to his homeland; and second, is there sufficient state action involved in
that torture.” Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 350-51 (5th Cir. 2006).
      While Garcia-Meza proffered evidence of mistreatment found to be credible
by the immigration judge, this evidence is insufficient to meet the high burden
imposed by the relevant section of the CAT. Although Garcia-Meza was raped
when he was a child in Honduras, he did not report the assault to authorities,
so this terrible incident does not support the conclusion that he will be tortured
by or with the acquiescence of the Honduran Government. Garcia-Meza does not
point to any evidence of government involvement in the murder of his uncle nor
any evidence that the government is likely to be involved in any future gang
violence. The acts of government-sanctioned discrimination and intimidation
documented in the State Department’s 2009 Human Rights Report on Honduras,
while deplorable, do not rise to the level of torture. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1).
The Human Rights Report does not provide sufficient evidence about violence
committed or threatened against homosexuals by security forces and police to
overturn the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision. Cf. Chen v. Gonzales, 470
F.3d 1131, 1140-41 (5th Cir. 2006). Without more, the alleged failure of police
to investigate the murders and hate crimes committed by unknown actors
against homosexuals does not amount to government acquiescence as defined by

                                            2
   Case: 11-60263    Document: 00511649677      Page: 3   Date Filed: 10/31/2011

                                  No. 11-60263

CAT. See Demiraj v. Holder, 631 F.3d 194, 201 (5th Cir. 2011), petition for cert.
filed (June 20, 2011) (No. 10-1545).
      To the extent that Garcia-Meza asserts that he was also eligible for asylum
relief, he has waived any challenge to the determination that he was statutorily
ineligible for such relief by failing to brief the issue. See Yohey v. Collins, 985
F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).
      The decision to deny Garcia-Meza deferral of removal under the CAT is
supported by substantial evidence. See Zhang, 432 F.3d at 344. Garcia-Meza’s
petition for review is DENIED, and the respondent’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED.

                                        3