Court Opinion

ID: 9713305
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 05:13:05.088033+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:16.379206
License: Public Domain

MANDERINO, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the affirming of the judgment of sentence, but I do not agree with all the reasons stated. Appellant’s double jeopardy claim is without merit, and he is therefore not entitled to a discharge. I cannot agree, however, that any waiver occurred. Commonwealth v. Peters, 473 Pa. 89, 373 A.2d 1064 (1977) (Manderino, J., dissenting opinion).
As to the photograph, I arrive at the same conclusion as the majority for different reasons. The photograph, as the *157majority points out, is not obviously the photograph of a corpse and was not inflammatory. Commonwealth v. Wade, 480 Pa. 160, 174-175, 389 A.2d 560, 567 (1978) (Manderino, J., dissenting opinion).