Court Opinion

ID: 1001379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:54:45.797759+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:19.117272
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-7570

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

FRANK N. GOODWIN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-89-288)

Submitted:   April 13, 2000                 Decided:   April 19, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank N. Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nance Nicholson, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Frank Goodwin seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his motion purportedly filed under Fed. R. Crim. P.

36 asking the court to correct a clerical error in its judgment.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Goodwin, No. CR-89-288 (E.D. Va.

Oct. 13, 1999).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2