Court Opinion

ID: 53426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:24:19+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:07.958164
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                     FILED
                        ________________________          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                            ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                 June 7, 2007
                               No. 06-16212                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 05-00456-CR-T-17-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

ORLANDO VENECILLA SALAS,
a.k.a. Salas Orlando,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                                (June 7, 2007)

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     John Kingston, appointed appellate counsel for Orlando Venecilla Salas, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Salas’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2