Court Opinion

ID: 9944959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-26 19:00:40.759433+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:18.772908
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10765           Document: 59         Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/26/2024

           United States Court of Appeals
                for the Fifth Circuit
                                   ____________
                                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                      Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 23-10765
                                  Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                  ____________                               February 26, 2024
                                                                               Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                    Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                          versus

Leida Jimena Hernandez-Munoz,

                                            Defendant—Appellant.
                   ______________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:21-CR-446-2
                   ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Leida Jimena Hernandez-Munoz
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Munoz has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

       _____________________
       *
           This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
 Case: 23-10765      Document: 59       Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/26/2024

                               No. 23-10765

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.

                                    2