Court Opinion

ID: 9920296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-18 23:24:56.238966+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:21.209999
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered April 24, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People V Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [15]).
The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.