Court Opinion

ID: 1005267
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:54:12.793795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:30.945706
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMAL HICKS,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
99-520-S, CA-01-1460-S)

Submitted:     September 6, 2001       Decided:   September 14, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jamal Hicks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Hicks, Nos. CR-99-520-S; CA-01-1460-S

(D. Md. May 24, 2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2