Court Opinion

ID: 3562771
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:12:56.093137+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:46.377646
License: Public Domain

We have carefully examined the record and the arguments of counsel in this cause. The conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor, who dismissed the complainant's bill seeking a receiver for the defendant company, was in all respects proper, because the bill lacked proofs and was insufficient.
The decree of dismissal is, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 349