Court Opinion

ID: 991744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:41:25.606949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:30.969964
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-6066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AMOS ADAIR STILTNER,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District
Judge. (CR-92-53)

Submitted:   March 13, 1997                 Decided:   March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Adair Stiltner, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-

tion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Stiltner, No. CR-92-53 (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2