Court Opinion

ID: 4235356
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-09 21:00:41.440648+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:17.979736
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-12022   Date Filed: 01/09/2018   Page: 1 of 2

                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 17-12022
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00282-VMC-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

TYLER DWAYNE WADDLE,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (January 9, 2018)

Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Tyler Waddle in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
              Case: 17-12022    Date Filed: 01/09/2018   Page: 2 of 2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Waddle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2