Court Opinion

ID: 8455925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:48:36.910318+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.864760
License: Public Domain

*576Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony B. Alexander appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 8, 2012); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) (holding that § 3582(c) proceeding is not a resentencing). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 Although the district court granted Alexander’s § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alexander’s sentence to the full extent he requested.