Court Opinion

ID: 9929946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-05 20:01:07.109305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:57:55.224327
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11752    Document: 23-1     Date Filed: 02/05/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-11752
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       QUINTON BANNISTER,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket Nos. 9:05-cr-80063-DMM-1,
                            9:20-cv-81129-DMM-1
USCA11 Case: 23-11752      Document: 23-1     Date Filed: 02/05/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-11752

                            ____________________

       Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Quinton Bannister in
       appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
       appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
       738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
       that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor-
       rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
       no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
       GRANTED, and Bannister’s sentences are AFFIRMED.