Court Opinion

ID: 674353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:53:38+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:35.729656
License: Public Domain

29 F.3d 635
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Leticia HERNANDEZ-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-50010.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 18, 1993.*Decided July 21, 1994.

Before:  FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Leticia Hernandez-Gutierrez appeals her conviction and 46-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841(a)(1), 846.  Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Gutierrez's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3