Court Opinion

ID: 7439264
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:03:21.134108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:34.204509
License: Public Domain

MANN, Judge
(dissenting).
A mere recitation is not a sufficient record, and that is all there is to support the denial of evidentiary hearing in this case. What the outcome of such a hearing might be I cannot know. But Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, requires it. Compare the unexceptionable procedure approved in Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.