Court Opinion

ID: 9372688
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-22 08:09:11.972195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:36.731360
License: Public Domain

Order entered February 17, 2023

                                     In The
                             Court of Appeals
                      Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

                              No. 05-22-01112-CR

                     JONATHAN OLIVAREZ, Appellant

                                        V.

                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

               On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                    Trial Court Cause No. F19-57776-N

                                     ORDER

      Before the Court is appellant’s motion to unseal volume 6 of the reporter’s

record and supplement reporter’s record with unsealed volume 6. Appellant was

indicted for and convicted of the aggravated assault of the complainant, Eric

Cabello. Volume 6 of the reporter’s record is the transcription of a closed hearing

of the trial court with Mr. Cabello and his attorney. Volume 6 was filed with this

Court under seal. Unsealed portions of the record show that Mr. Cabello asserted

his Fifth Amendment privilege from testifying at the trial, which the trial court
sustained. During the hearing, Mr. Cabello’s attorney proffered evidence of Mr.

Cabello’s anticipated testimony. That evidence does not appear to be part of the

sealed volume 6 of the reporter’s record nor is it found elsewhere in the appellate

record. Appellant’s attorney on appeal states in the motion to unseal that he has

spoken with the trial court and the court reporter about unsealing volume 6 and the

trial court advised appellant’s attorney that the trial court will unseal volume 6.

However, no order unsealing volume 6 has been made part of the appellate record.

      We ORDER the trial court to hold a hearing and make findings of fact and

recommendations, by MARCH 24, 2023, and determine (1) whether volume 6 of

the reporter’s record should remain under seal, (2) whether the proffered evidence

of Mr. Cabello’s likely testimony was presented in the hearing included in volume

6 of the reporter’s record, and (3) if the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely

testimony was presented in the hearing, whether a supplemental reporter’s record

containing the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely testimony should be

under seal when filed with this Court.

      If the trial court determines that volume 6 of the reporter’s record should not

be sealed, then the trial court shall sign an order vacating the order sealing volume

6. If the trial court determines the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely
testimony is available and should be under seal when filed with this Court, the trial

court shall sign an appropriate order sealing the volume.

      If the proffered likely testimony of Mr. Cabello was presented in the hearing

but is not available, then the court shall make findings whether appellant was at

fault for the loss of the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely testimony,

whether the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely testimony is necessary to

the appeal’s resolution, and whether the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s likely

testimony can be replaced by agreement of the parties or with a copy determined

by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the original

proffered evidence presented at the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f). The trial

court shall also determine whether any copy of the proffered evidence of Mr.

Cabello’s likely testimony that is agreed-to by the parties or approved by the trial

court should be under seal when filed with this Court.

      If the trial court determines that the proffered evidence of Mr. Cabello’s

likely testimony was presented in the hearing and is available or the parties agree

to a replacement copy or the trial court determines a copy accurately duplicates it

with reasonable certainty, then the court reporter shall file a supplemental

reporter’s record with this Court containing the proffered evidence of Mr.
Cabello’s likely testimony together with any sealing order signed by the trial court

within THIRTY DAYS after the trial court’s determination.

      The trial court shall appoint counsel for Mr. Cabello to represent his interests

at the hearing.

      We direct the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Hector

Garza, Presiding Judge, 195th Judicial District Court; Velma R. Loza, Official

Court Reporter 195th Judicial District Court; Josh David Healy, attorney for Eric

Cabello; John Tatum, attorney for appellant; and the Office of the Dallas County

District Attorney, Appellate Division.

      This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above

order. This appeal shall be reinstated when the record transmitted by the trial court

is received or at such other time as the Court deems proper.

                                              /s/   ERIN A. NOWELL
                                                    JUSTICE