Court Opinion

ID: 7901611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:56:16.251032+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:32:16.763767
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by Ragsdale from a decision overruling his motion for a new trial and to tax the costs of the receivership to the plaintiffs. It was submitted, together with cause number 18,272, in which an opinion revérsing the judgment of the district court was handed down June 7, 1913. (Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff, 89 Kan. 821, 132 Pac. 1005.)
(See, also, Ellis v. Woodruff, 88 Kan. 734, 129 Pac. 1193.)
The judgment in this case will be affirmed.