Court Opinion

ID: 5567355
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:04:44.113488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:35.159316
License: Public Domain

Lumpkin, J.

1. Even if the authenticity and correctness of a book purporting to have been kept by the board ,of trade of a given city, and to be a record of the prices of certain commodities ■sold therein, are on the trial of a particular case sufficiently established to render the book admissible in evidence, its rejection will not be cause for a new trial when it does not appear that admitting it would have established any fact beneficial to the party offering it.
:2. The charges complained of were not erroneous for any reason assigned in the motion for a new trial, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.