Court Opinion

ID: 868220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-17 20:13:33.662023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:05.235164
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAY 17 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-50422

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 8:07-cr-00296-DOC

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
ANTWAN EUGENE BROWN, a.k.a.
Antwon Eugene Brown,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Central District of California
                     David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted May 14, 2013 **

Before:        LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

       Antwan Eugene Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 64-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Brown’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds

for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Brown the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                   10-50422