Court Opinion

ID: 5205927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 16:02:23.343859+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:17.168492
License: Public Domain

Miller, J.:
The defendants are copartners, and the negligence charged was the maintenance by the defendants of an open unguarded cellar-way on their premises near the sidewalk. The plaintiff, a little-boy eight years of age, was sitting on the step by the side of the cellarway when one of the defendants kicked him and caused him to fall into the cellar way, sustaining injuries for which he has recovered. The plaintiff’s theory is that the open cellarway was one of the proximate causes of the injuries; that that and the assault were concurrent causes. We do not think sol ' The plaintiff’s cause of action, if any, is for assault against the person who committed the assault. -
The judgment and order should be reversed and a hew trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
Jehks, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented.
Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.