Court Opinion

ID: 6901626
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 21:55:32.497917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:06:11.578042
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Slater
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff settled upon this land in the fall of 1887, having purchased the possessory right of Samuel Ronge, who had settled thereon in 1886. It was then inclosed by á fence, and there had been erected thereon a house, a stable, sheds, hay and stock corrals. On January 15, 1889, he entered the land under the homestead law, under the same circumstances as did Morrow and his sons. He has resided upon the land and cultivated it continuously from the time of his first settlement, excepting during a portion of the year 1889, when he was enjoined from occupying the land by some proceedings initiated by R. F. McConnaughy. Plaintiff was one of the parties to the contest of J. L. Morrow and others against the State of Oregon and the defendant herein, and for that reason he did not make final proof, his entry having been canceled May 9, 1903, as the effect of the decision rendered March 16,1903, 32 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 54.
The legal principles announced and the conclusions reached in the case of Morrow v. Warner Valley Stock Co., 56 Or. 312 (101 Pac. 171), are conclusive here, from which it results that the decree of the lower court is reversed, and one entered here adjudging plaintiff to be the owner of the equitable title to the land described; that defendant holds the legal title thereto subject to plaintiff’s equity, and that it be required to convey the same to the plaintiff by proper deed, executed by its officers within 90 days from the time the mandate is entered in the court below, and in default thereof the decree stand as and for a conveyance.
Further prosecution of the ejectment action is perpetually enjoined. Reversed.