Court Opinion

ID: 6347296
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-06 18:00:25.027329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:22.511653
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-51119          Document: 00516345131     Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/06/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                            June 6, 2022
                                   No. 21-51119                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                 Summary Calendar                              Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Roberto Ochoa,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:21-CR-240-1

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *   0F

          The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Ochoa has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Ochoa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-51119     Document: 00516345131          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/06/2022

                                   No. 21-51119

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2