Court Opinion

ID: 1009010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:49:20.238528+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:13.821614
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIAM R. TALLEY,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-99-530, CA-01-2420-6-13)

Submitted:   November 7, 2002          Decided:     November 15, 2002

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William R. Talley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     William R. Talley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).   We have

reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district

court that Talley has not made a substantial showing of the denial

of a constitutional right.   See United States v. Talley, Nos. CR-

99-530; CA-01-2420-6-13 (D.S.C. filed July 25, 2002 & entered July

26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2