Court Opinion

ID: 6221925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-15 19:00:23.349348+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:57:24.951644
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-50071      Document: 00516202746         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/15/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                                                       FILED
                                                                February 15, 2022
                                  No. 19-50071
                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Tawoine Banks,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:18-CR-82-4

   Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Tawoine Banks has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Banks has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-50071     Document: 00516202746          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/15/2022

                                   No. 19-50071

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2