Court Opinion

ID: 856999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-04-02 19:28:06.893388+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:31:17.017772
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 12-8075

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

D. BOYD, Officer,

                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cr-00330-RBS-LRL)

Submitted:   March 28, 2013                 Decided:   April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.                     We

have     reviewed   the     record   and     find    no   reversible     error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.     Brown v. Boyd, No. 2:11-cv-00330-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov.

9, 2012).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions     are    adequately   presented     in   the   materials

before    this   court    and   argument   would    not   aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                       2