Court Opinion

ID: 2591536
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:58:02.636527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:02.997240
License: Public Domain

50 N.Y.2d 1009 (1980)
Lena I. Nopper, Respondent,
v.
Robert J. Nopper, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted May 30, 1980.
Decided July 1, 1980.
George A. Glassanos for appellant.
Abram Miner for respondent.
Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.
*1010MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In these circumstances, the Appellate Division correctly concluded that plaintiff may maintain an action on the parties' separation agreement. Defendant, in his answer, did not dispute the validity of the agreement, and therefore is deemed to have admitted it (CPLR 3018, subd [a]). He may not now be heard to complain that the contract is no longer in existence. In so ruling, we intimate no view on the question whether defendant could collaterally attack the clause in the divorce *1011 decree which provided for survival of the separation agreement.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.