Court Opinion

ID: 6030674
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 12:48:47.940812+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:14.863377
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered November 9, 1994, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove all of the elements of the crimes of rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard *403the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.