Court Opinion

ID: 660928
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:11:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:04.898632
License: Public Domain

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Warren SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department ofCorrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 93-6801.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 29, 1993.
Dec. 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Warren Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Smith v. Murray, No. CA-92-816-2 (E.D. Va.  July 2, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED