Court Opinion

ID: 1024791
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:39:26.598621+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:30.524914
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Damond Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Damond,
  
  No. 3:02-cr-00193-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.