Court Opinion

ID: 9952631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-20 14:10:47.680933+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:41:59.464526
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
                               APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
        This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
     internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

                                                        SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
                                                        APPELLATE DIVISION
                                                        DOCKET NO. A-3135-21

DENESE ROME,

          Plaintiff-Respondent/
          Cross-Appellant,

v.

DAVID SHARROW, SR.,

     Defendant-Appellant/
     Cross-Respondent.
_______________________

                   Submitted March 13, 2024 – Decided March 20, 2024

                   Before Judges Currier, Firko, and Susswein.

                   On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey,
                   Chancery Division, Family Part, Gloucester County,
                   Docket No. FM-08-0796-18.

                   Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys for
                   appellant/cross-respondent      (Michael   James
                   Confusione, of counsel and on the briefs).

                   Einhorn, Barbarito, Frost & Botwinick, PC, attorneys
                   for respondent/cross-appellant (Bonnie C. Frost, on the
                   brief).
PER CURIAM

      This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having

stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-appeal, the appeals are

dismissed with prejudice.

                                                                     A-3135-21
                                    2