Court Opinion

ID: 5665682
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 03:53:55.132687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:39:12.574708
License: Public Domain

ROTHSCHILD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the majority opinion except as to part I.A. and B. of the Discussion, from which I respectfully dissent. In my view, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prohibited Last Patriot Productions, Inc. (Last Patriot), from unreasonably withholding consent to distribution costs in excess of $900,000, and there is no reason why a court cannot determine whether it would have been unreasonable for Last Patriot to withhold consent to Buena Vista’s distribution costs if Buena Vista had asked. Moreover, on this record it is undisputed that withholding consent would have been unreasonable—Buena Vista introduced evidence that its distribution costs were reasonable, Ilshin introduced no evidence to the contrary, and all parties agree that the ongoing distribution of the film was profitable. I further conclude that the implied covenant of *632good faith and fair dealing prohibited Last Patriot from requiring Buena Vista to continue to distribute the film if Last Patriot refused to consent to additional distribution costs, so the lost profits award should be reversed as well.
On June 1, 2011, and on June 13, 2011, the opinion was modified to read as printed above. Petitions for a rehearing were denied June 13, 2011.