Court Opinion

ID: 623294
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-02-23 01:02:11+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:04.012134
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 11-7520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

STACEY CORNELIUS HARRIS, a/k/a Stacy Cornelius Harris,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:07-cr-00011-JLK-2)

Submitted:   February 16, 2012            Decided:   February 22, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacey Cornelius Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant  United   States  Attorney,  Roanoke,  Virginia,  for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Stacey Cornelius Harris appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).           We have reviewed the record and

find   no   reversible    error.      Accordingly,   we    affirm    for   the

reasons stated by the district court.         United States v. Harris,

No. 4:07-cr-00011-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2011).                  We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately    presented    in   the   materials   before    the    court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                      2