Court Opinion

ID: 9812753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 22:47:06.838771+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:26:22.107570
License: Public Domain

SANDSTROM, Justice,
dissenting.
[¶ 28] I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 29] The offset issue relating to board income, on which the majority reverses, was not raised in the district court and cannot properly be considered on appeal. See Peters-Riemers v. Riemers, 2002 ND 49, ¶ 9, 641 N.W.2d 83 (issues not raised to the trial court may not be raised on appeal).
[¶ 30] I would affirm the district court.
[¶ 31] DALE V. SANDSTROM