Court Opinion

ID: 4365458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-07 11:36:52.389401+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:48:14.536673
License: Public Domain

DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 6, 2019

                                          S    In The
                                Court of Appeals
                         Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                       No. 05-19-00037-CR

                           ALISHA RENA MCKINNEY, Appellant
                                         V.
                             THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                      On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court
                                   Dallas County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. F17-40185-P

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
                         Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Reichek
                                  Opinion by Justice Whitehill
       Alisha Rena McKinney appeals her August 7, 2017 conviction for tampering with a

government record by making, presenting, and using a Texas driver’s license with knowledge of

its falsity. After appellant pleaded guilty without a plea bargain agreement, the trial court found

her guilty and assessed punishment at ten years in prison.

       Appellant filed her notice of appeal in the trial court on March 9, 2018; it was forwarded

to this Court on January 9, 2019. After the clerk’s record was filed, we sent the parties a

jurisdictional letter, questioning whether the Court had jurisdiction over the appeal.

       In her letter brief, appellant states she is attempting to appeal the trial court’s denial of her

motion for shock probation and concedes this Court lacks jurisdiction to do so. See Houlihan v.

State, 579 S.W.2d 213, 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.3d 833, 834 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (holding that appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear appeal

from denial of motion for shock probation); Soto v. State, No. 05-00-00092-CR, 2000 WL 869352,

at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 30, 2000, no pet., not designated for publication) (same).

       In its letter brief, the State agrees with appellant’s statement that the Court lacked

jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for shock probation but also notes that appellant’s

notice of appeal was untimely filed.

       As previously noted, the denial of a motion for shock probation is not an appealable order.

See Houlihan, 579 S.W.2d at 216; Dodson, 988 S.W.3d at 834; Soto, 2000 WL 869352, at *1.

With respect to appellant’s underlying conviction, the trial court found appellant guilty and

assessed punishment on August 7, 2017. Absent a timely motion for new trial, appellant’s notice

of appeal was due no later than September 6, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). However,

appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on March 9, 2018. Because it was filed

outside the thirty-day period allowed by rule 26.2, the notice of appeal was untimely.

       For these reasons, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                  /Bill Whitehill/
                                                  BILL WHITEHILL
                                                  JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
190037F.U05

                                               –2–
                                        S
                               Court of Appeals
                        Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                      JUDGMENT

 ALISHA RENA MCKINNEY, Appellant                   On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District
                                                   Court, Dallas County, Texas
 No. 05-19-00037-CR         V.                     Trial Court Cause No. F17-40185-P.
                                                   Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill,
 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                      Justices Molberg and Reichek participating.

        Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of
jurisdiction.

Judgment entered February 6, 2019

                                             –3–