Court Opinion

ID: 9915016
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-04 09:10:16.272299+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:16:44.245246
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                                 EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                      EL PASO, TEXAS

 SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM,                         §              No. 08-23-00123-CV
 AN AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN
 ANTONIO,                                          §                Appeal from the

                                Appellant,         §          225th Judicial District Court

 v.                                                §            of Bexar County, Texas

 THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF                          §              (TC# 2023CI04528)
 NORTH AMERICA USA,
                    Appellee.

                                        JUDGMENT

       The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying SAWS’s plea to the jurisdiction and

render judgment granting SAWS’s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissing with prejudice all of

GCNA’s counterclaims against SAWS, with the exception of the breach-of-contract counterclaim

based on SAWS’s alleged failure to pay the balance due of $119,990.33 for the labor, materials,

goods, and services Thyssen delivered to the project for SAWS’s benefit.

       IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

                                              SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Chief Justice (Ret.)

Before Palafox, J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)
Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)