Court Opinion

ID: 991246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:33:58.946669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:19.929337
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-2375

ALOK KUMAR,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

ROBERT E. CAHILL,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96-
2435-L)

Submitted:    January 9, 1997              Decided:   January 16, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Kumar v. Cahill, No. CA-96-2435-L (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2