Court Opinion

ID: 9404903
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-26 18:04:43.624138+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:17.918856
License: Public Domain

Filed 6/26/23 P. v. Campos CA2/6
   NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                         SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                         DIVISION SIX

 THE PEOPLE,                                                  2d Crim. Nos. B325042,
                                                                B325045, B325057
      Plaintiff and Respondent,                            (Super. Ct. Nos. 2021026955,
                                                             2022001697, 2019033436)
 v.                                                              (Ventura County)

 HENRY EZEQUIAL CAMPOS,

      Defendant and Appellant.

      Henry Ezequial Campos1 appeals from the judgment after
his guilty pleas in three cases.
      In case 2019033436 (B325057), Campos stabbed the victim
with a screwdriver when he refused Campos entrance to the
victim’s residence to charge a cell phone. Campos pleaded guilty

         1 Defendant’s
                    name is spelled Henry Eziquiel Campos in
some parts of the record.
to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)),2
admitted he was ineligible for probation because he was on parole
for a serious or violent felony (§ 1203.085, subd. (a)), and
admitted a five-year sentence enhancement for a prior serious
felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)).
       In case 2021026955 (B325042), Campos took a customer’s
vehicle from an auto body shop and drove it on the freeway and
into a ditch. In a separate incident, he took a pickup truck a city
maintenance worker had parked at a work site. Campos pleaded
guilty to two counts of unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle
(Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)) and admitted he committed the
crimes while on bail for earlier cases (§ 12022.1, subd. (b)).
       In case 2022001697 (B325045), police contacted Campos
and found a fixed blade knife approximately eight inches long in
his pocket. He pleaded guilty to carrying a concealed dirk or
dagger (§ 21310) and admitted on-bail allegations (§ 12022.1,
subd. (b)).
       In each case, Campos admitted he suffered a prior strike
(§§ 667, subds. (c)(1) & (e)(1), 1170.12, subds. (a)(1) & (c)(1)) and
admitted an executed sentence must be served in prison (§ 1170,
subd. (h)(3)). Additional counts were dismissed in each case with
the agreement they could be considered at sentencing. (People v.
Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754, 758; § 1192.3, subd. (b) [restitution
for dismissed counts pursuant to Harvey waiver].)
       The trial court sentenced Campos to state prison for the
mid-term of three years for the assault, doubled to six years
based on the prior strike. The court imposed consecutive

      2All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless
otherwise stated.

                                 2
sentences of 16 months each for the dirk/dagger conviction and
two convictions of vehicle taking/driving (one-third the mid-term
of two years, doubled for the strike). The total prison sentence
was 10 years. The court struck the on-bail enhancements and
the five-year serious felony prior.
       In each case, the trial court imposed a $300 restitution fine
(§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and stayed a $300 parole revocation
restitution fine (§ 1202.45). The court ordered Campos to pay
$553.47 in restitution to Levernia McCree, the victim of a
vandalism count dismissed in case 2019033436. The court also
ordered Campos to pay $1,800 in restitution to Luis Angel Banos
Torres, the victim of an attempted grand theft dismissed in case
2021026955.
       The appeal is based on the sentence and does not affect the
validity of the plea. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)(2)(B).)
        We appointed counsel to represent Campos in this appeal.
After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that
raises no arguable issues. On May 2, 2023, we advised Campos
by mail that he had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues
he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
       We have reviewed the entire record and found as to case
2019033436 the amended abstract of judgment incorrectly omits
the mandatory $300 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), the
mandatory $300 parole revocation restitution fine (§ 1202.45),
and the restitution order to Levernia McCree. These clerical
errors must be corrected. (People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th
181, 185.) We are otherwise satisfied that Campos’s attorney has
fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable
issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-443.)
                           DISPOSITION
       The clerk of the superior court shall prepare an amended

                                 3
abstract of judgment to include for case 2019033436 the
restitution fine, stayed parole restitution fine, and restitution
order to Levernia McCree, and forward copies to the Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In all other respects, the
judgment is affirmed.
      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

                                    BALTODANO, J.
We concur:

             GILBERT, P.J.

             CODY, J.

                                4
                  Patricia M. Murphy, Judge

              Superior Court County of Ventura

               ______________________________

     Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
     No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.