Court Opinion

ID: 8453787
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:42:37.91798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:01.985964
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elan Christopher Lewis appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Lewis’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 3:94-cr-00094-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2012). We also affirm the denial of Lewis’s motion to reconsider, noting that the district court lacked authority to even consider the motion. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.