Court Opinion

ID: 9831758
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:20:27.668606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:37.703415
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellants insist that the quoted excerpts from the pleadings in Cause Number 3303 are not sufficient to sustain a money judgment against them. Conceding for the sake of argument the' correctness of their position, the judgment is still not void. Under Rules 67 and 90, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, when a case is tried before the court without a jury, the insufficiency or lack of pleadings must be raised by objection in the trial court. Bednarz v. State, 142 Tex. 138, 176 S.W.2d 562, 563; Currie v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 191 S.W.2d 704, 705; Litterst v. Edmonds, Tex.Civ.App., 176 S.W.2d 342, 343, writ of error refused for want of merit; Blair v. Archer County, Tex.Civ.App., 192 S.W.2d 573, 575. It follows that the judgment cannot be held void for lack of supporting pleadings.
Appellants’ motion for rehearing is overruled.