Court Opinion

ID: 2922890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:24:38.970671+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:45.746579
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-157-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

SCOTT STANLEY,		Appellant,

v.

KATHERINE SPRINGER,	Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 275th  District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, SCOTT STANLEY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number F-1591-01-E. 
After the clerk's record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the
motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant
requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant's
motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Any pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed 
this the 16th day of November, 2006.