Court Opinion

ID: 46006
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:50:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:32.668229
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 5, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-10984
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GLORIA MORRIS,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:05-CR-49-ALL
                       --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gloria Morris

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Gonzales, 40 F.3d 735, 738 (5th Cir. 1994), which held that the

Due Process Clause does not bar punishments under both 21 U.S.C.

§ 841 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).    The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.