Court Opinion

ID: 8466975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:54:14.627575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.164974
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *839error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Reese, No. 1:08-cv-00096-LMB-JFA, 2009 WL 577594 (E.D.Va. Mar. 6, 2009). We deny Davis’ motions for appointment of counsel and his motion to defer payment of the filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.