Court Opinion

ID: 6011183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 10:49:41.451916+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:50:21.371382
License: Public Domain

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondents are not submitting a brief and requests that this proceeding be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and *719expunged from petitioner’s records. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).
Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.