Court Opinion

ID: 996007
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:45:18.168726+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:01.511188
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 97-7289

MICHAEL H. ROSHTO,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
Department of Corrections,

                                                Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-96-1201-2)

Submitted:   August 13, 1998                 Decided:   August 28, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael H. Roshto, Appellant Pro Se. Collin Jefferson Hite, SANDS,
ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Roshto v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1201-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 20,

1997). We deny Appellant’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2