Court Opinion

ID: 8451999
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:51:28.839918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.507144
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sylvester E. Harding, III, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 *206U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harding v. Shinseki, No. 5:12-cM)3095-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2012; Dec. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.