Court Opinion

ID: 1006527
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:12:46.579955+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:29.540497
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals from the district court’s order denying his motions for reduction of restitution and for finding and retesting of DNA evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Nance,
  
  No. CR-92-135 (W.D.Va. filed Sept. 6, 2001
  
   &
  
  entered Sept. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.