Court Opinion

ID: 5978622
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 08:07:14.635334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:54.628072
License: Public Domain

Lawton, J. (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The sole proximate cause of the bridge collapse is the conduct of the third-party defendant G & J Construction Corporation’s president and plaintiff’s decedent in driving a 17-ton crane and a four-ton truck, respectively, over a one-lane bridge limited to vehicles weighing less than eight tons. Given those circumstances, i.e., 21 tons being placed on an eight-ton bridge, the County of Chautauqua (County) cannot be held liable for the collapse of the bridge.
*831Plaintiff’s contention that the bridge was not safe for vehicles under eight tons is not relevant. That contention would be relevant only if the bridge collapsed when subjected to vehicles weighing eight tons or less.
Consequently, I would reverse the order appealed from and grant the County’s motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. —Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Wesley and Boehm, JJ.