Court Opinion

ID: 5444551
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 18:08:32.37997+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:32:08.160802
License: Public Domain

Beatty, C. J.
— In this case the appellants move to
dismiss their own appeal, upon the ground that the judgment appealed from has been satisfied.
The motion is opposed by parties who claim to have succeeded to the rights of the original plaintiff, and who ask to be substituted as respondents, upon the ground that the alleged satisfaction of the judgment was entered in fraud of their rights.
A number of affidavits have been filed relating to this controversy, but we do not think this the proper forum for its determination. A dismissal of the appeal will simply have the effect of affirming the judgment, and remitting the questions as to the persons entitled to enjoy the fruits of it, and as to whether or not it has' been satisfied, to the superior court, where they ought to be tried. We do not decide these questions, but we see no reason to deny the motion.
Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.
Thornton, J., Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., and Fox, J., concurred.