Court Opinion

ID: 9847594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:02:46.322888+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:21.670452
License: Public Domain

BLACKBIRD, Justice
(specially concurring).
I cannot agree with the majority opinion wherein it holds that plaintiff’s Exhibits 10 to 15, inclusive, were admissible under Tit. 12 O.S.1951 ■§§ 486 and 502. These documents no doubt furnish some evidence of negligence of the defendant. Even so, there was other evidence of negligence on the part of the City sufficient to justify a verdict. An examination of the evidence as to the damages shown plaintiff suffered was far greater than the amount determined by the jury. To say that these documents influenced the jury would only be a wild conjecture. I concur specially.