Court Opinion

ID: 9352361
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-05 21:00:38.490403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:40.274024
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1015    Doc: 16         Filed: 01/04/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                           UNPUBLISHED

                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                 FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                             No. 22-1015

        REGINA M. HUNTER EL,

                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

                    v.

        ELIJAH HUNTER; SUMTER COUNTY MAGISTRATE COURT,

                           Defendants - Appellees.

                                             No. 22-1021

        ELIJAH HUNTER,

                           Plaintiff - Appellee,

                    v.

        REGINA M. HUNTER EL, a/k/a Regina M. Hunter, a/k/a Regina Mack, a/k/a
        Hunter,

                           Defendant - Appellant.

        Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-02928-MBS; 3:21-cv-
        02929-MBS)

        Submitted: November 29, 2022                                Decided: January 4, 2023
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1015      Doc: 16         Filed: 01/04/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        Before NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Regina M. Hunter El, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1015      Doc: 16         Filed: 01/04/2023      Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

               Regina M. Hunter-El appeals the district court’s order dismissing her federal

        complaint without prejudice and remanding a removed complaint to state court. We have

        reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

        stated by the district court. Hunter-El v. Hunter, No. 3:21-cv-02928-MBS (D.S.C. filed

        Oct. 17, 2021; entered Oct. 18, 2021); Hunter v. Hunter-El, No. 3:21-cv-02929-MBS

        (D.S.C. filed Oct. 17, 2021; entered Oct. 18, 2021). We deny Hunter-El’s motions to

        supplement and for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     3