Court Opinion

ID: 2916804
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-10 21:08:48.444963+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:24:50.674642
License: Public Domain

MARY'S OPINION HEADING                                           

                NO. 12-06-00342-CV
 
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
 
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT
 
TYLER, TEXAS
 
 
DEANDRE
P. JONES,         §          APPEAL FROM THE 87TH
APPELLANT
 
V.        §          JUDICIAL
DISTRICT COURT OF
 
MAJOR
DEVERY W. MOONEYHAM, 
SGT. KEVIN L. CARLVIN,
SHERRI L.     §          ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MILLIGAN
AND KAREN J. NORMAN,
APPELLEES 
 

 
 

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER
CURIAM
            This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction
pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a).  The trial court’s judgment was signed on
August 17, 2006.  Under rule of appellate
procedure 26.1(a), unless Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial or
other postjudgment motion that extended the appellate deadlines, his notice of
appeal was due to have been filed “within 30 days after the judgment [was]
signed,” i.e., September 18, 2006. 
Appellant did not file a motion for new trial or other postjudgment
motion that extended the appellate deadlines. 
Moreover, Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file
his notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  Consequently, the time for perfecting
Appellant’s appeal was not extended.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).  Appellant filed his notice of appeal on
September 28, 2006.  Because the notice
of appeal was not filed on or before September 18, 2006, this Court has no
jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

            On September 28, 2006, this Court notified Appellant
pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal
was untimely.  Appellant was further
informed that unless the record was amended on or before October 9, 2006 to
establish the jurisdiction of this Court, the appeal would be dismissed.  In his response to our October 9, 2006
notice, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal.  However, the amended notice of appeal does
not cure the jurisdictional defect created by Appellant’s untimely filed notice
of appeal.
            Because this Court is not authorized to extend the time
for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
Opinion
delivered October 11, 2006.
Panel
consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(PUBLISH)