Court Opinion

ID: 9675390
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:52:11.756914+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:34.191920
License: Public Domain

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.
BEAUCHAMP, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is lodged chiefly against the holding of this court as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show malice. We have carefully considered the record and the argument in favor of this contention and remain of the opinion that the jury is supported in its finding.
Attack is made on this court’s holding as to the nature of the proof necessary to show malice in Harvey v. State, 150 Texas Grim. Rep. 332, 201 S.W. 2d 42. We have given consideration to this contention and decline to modify any expression on the subject in that case.
We have again considered Bills of Exception Numbers 3 and 4 and conclude that the holding in the original opinion expresses the judgment of the court and should be sustained.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.