Court Opinion

ID: 544373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:06:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:41.672241
License: Public Domain

907 F.2d 1137Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Curtis Nathaniel FOWLKES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Robert FRYE, M.D., Chief Physician of Health Care Service,Department of Corrections;  Edward D. Carey, M.D.,Physician, Buckingham CorrectionalCenter, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6302.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 1990.Decided June 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge.  (C/A No. 89-488-N)
Curtis Nathaniel Fowlkes, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Curtis Nathaniel Fowlkes appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Fowlkes v. Frye, C/A No. 89-488-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 5, 1990).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.