Court Opinion

ID: 8480880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 18:57:08.491929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:31.419421
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for ap*970pointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00059-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.