Court Opinion

ID: 4037565
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-28 04:35:29.922803+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:15.574261
License: Public Domain

People v Vanterpool (2016 NY Slip Op 06158)

People v Vanterpool

2016 NY Slip Op 06158

Decided on September 27, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 27, 2016

Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Richter, Gische, Kahn, JJ.

1714 1104/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
v Nuradeen Vanterpool, Defendant-Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Lauren Stephens-Davidowitz of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered January 8, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2016
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.