Court Opinion

ID: 2627938
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-11-01 20:51:29.899303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:12:09.961953
License: Public Domain

206 P.3d 1212 (2009)
228 Or. App. 235
In the Matter of F.F.W., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
F.F.W., Appellant.
MC080015, A138769.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted April 3, 2009.
Decided April 29, 2009.
Michael Breiling, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Kailana Piimauna, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment recommitting her to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.307(6). The trial court found that appellant remains mentally ill and is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the judgment of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of appellant's mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs, and, consequently, we accept the concession.
Reversed.