Court Opinion

ID: 8673604
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:58:20.643237+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.595201
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Monica Gregory appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gregory, No. 4:02-cr-35-CWH (D.S.C. filed Mar. 18, entered Mar. 19, 2008). We deny Gregory’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.