Court Opinion

ID: 5471273
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-09 20:38:50.308841+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:19.518071
License: Public Domain

Davis, P. J.
The sole purpose of the provisions of the act aHowing the payment of money into the hands of the county clerk in cases like this seems to be to remove the lien from the hands of the party and impose it upon the money, the object being to enable the owner of real estate, by substituting money to the amount of the alleged Hen, and of costs, if an action be pending, to enjoy the power of disposing of *275his land relieved from the lien. The money takes the place of the lien to await the result of such proceedings as may be taken to establish a lien. This is distinctly settled, and we have no doubt correctly, in Dunning agt. Clarke (2 E. D. Smith, 535). The opinion of Ingraham, first judge, in that case discusses and settles, as it seems to us, the questions involved in this. That case arose under the laws of 1851, and some changes have been made in the phraseology of the section on which this question arises by the general act of 1880. We do not think, however, that the legislature intended to change the effect of the deposit, or to recognize and declare an absolute right in the lienor to receive the money without first establishing his lien.
The order below should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
All concur.