Court Opinion

ID: 7818179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 17:44:02.872469+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:39.575693
License: Public Domain

George Rose Smith, Justice. This appears to be a suit by the appellee to recover judgment upon a $30,-000 note and to impress a constructive trust upon certain land. The chancellor granted the money judgment but refused to enforce the asserted trust. The appellants gave notice of appeal and filed a two-volume record in this court, but they have not submitted an abstract or a brief. As to them the decree must be affirmed under our Rule 10. The appellee filed notice of cross appeal and has submitted a brief urging that the chancellor erred in refusing to declare a constructive trust. The appellee, however, has not abstracted that part of the record pertinent to her cross appeal, as she should have done. Terry v. Klein, 133 Ark. 363, 201 S. W. 801 (1918). It being impossible for all the seven judges to examine the record, we have no choice except to affirm the decree on cross appeal as well. Insured Lloyds v. Ahrend, 245 Ark. 225, 431 S. W. 2d 740 (1968). Affirmed.