Court Opinion

ID: 1024439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 06:33:31.273164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:17.979422
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Joseph Anthony Walker appealed from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp.2007) pursuant to Amendment 599. This case was previously remanded for a determination of timeliness of the appeal in the ten-day appeal period. On November 21, 2006, the district court determined that the appeal was timely noted and returned the case to the court. On July 2, 2007, judgment was entered affirming the district court’s order.
  
   See United States v. Walker,
  
  231 Fed.Appx. 282 (4th Cir.2007) (unpublished). The mandate issued on August 24, 2007.
 

  On December 1, 2006, Walker, proceeding pro se, noted another appeal of the order denying § 3582(c) relief, which is the notice of appeal related to the subject case. Having reviewed the record and the
  
   Anders
  
  brief, the court finds that this appeal is duplicitous and dismisses the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
   
   *615
   
  the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   DISMISSED.