Court Opinion

ID: 9936176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 18:57:29.364068+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:23.926822
License: Public Domain

I concur in Part III of the main opinion, in which this Court affirms the trial court's finding that Patsy Hathcock is not required to arbitrate her claims insofar as they do not relate to the underlying sale contract. I dissent from the remainder of the opinion, which reverses the trial court's denial of the motion to compel arbitration *Page 1069 
filed by Johnson Mobile Homes of Alabama, Inc. See my dissent in SelmaMedical Center v. Fontenot, 824 So.2d 668, 676-93 (Ala. 2001).