Court Opinion

ID: 990073
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:16:00.258715+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:33.532152
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6842

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

A. Z. MCCLURE, a/k/a Az McClure,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-23-P, CA-96-123-3-P)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

A. Z. McClure, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. McClure, Nos. CR-93-23-P; CA-96-
123-3-P (W.D.N.C. May 2, 1996). We decline to address the issues

Appellant raises for the first time on appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2