Court Opinion

ID: 3653971
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:07:44.217424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:55:47.551017
License: Public Domain

This is an action for a permanent injunction, restraining the defendant, C. O. Meredith and his agent, Southern Real Estate Company, from selling the land described in the complaint under the power of sale contained in a mortgage executed by Jesse Cole and wife, under whom plaintiff claims title to said land.
The action arose out of a controversy between the parties as to the amount due on the note secured by the mortgage. The plaintiff contended that the amount due is $1,493.45, with interest from 6 October, 1930; the defendant contended that said amount is $1,531.71, with interest from 15 May, 1930. It is admitted in the pleadings that after the defendant had advertised the land for sale under the power of sale in the mortgage, to wit, on 6 October, 1930, the plaintiff deposited with M. W. Gant, clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, the sum of $1,493.45, and caused notice to be served on the defendant by the sheriff of said county that said amount would be paid to the defendant by said clerk of the Superior Court, upon the surrender of the note marked paid and of the mortgage duly canceled. This action was commenced on 9 October, 1930.
The only issue submitted to the jury at the trial of the action was answered as follows:
"What amount is due the defendant, C. O. Meredith, upon the mortgage deed of Jesse Cole and wife mentioned and described in the complaint? Answer: $1,493.45."
From judgment ordering and decreeing that the note and mortgage executed by Jesse Cole and wife to the defendant, C. O. Meredith, and described in the complaint, be marked satisfied and canceled, and that said defendant be restrained and enjoined permanently from exercising the power of sale contained in said mortgage, the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.
There was no error in the trial of this action. On the argument of the defendants' appeal in this Court, their counsel stated that defendants did not desire a new trial of the issue involving the *Page 641 
amount due on the note secured by the mortgage, but did contend that there was error in the judgment. This contention is sustained.
The admission in the pleadings that prior to the commencement of this action, plaintiff had deposited with M. W. Gant, clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, the amount which he contended was due on the note, and which the jury found was the amount due, does not support the contention of the plaintiffs that said amount was thereby paid. There is no statute in this State which authorizes a person who is a party to a controversy as to the amount of his debt to another, to pay the amount which he contends is due to a clerk of the Superior Court, and thereby discharge his debt. In the instant case, M. W. Gant received the amount paid to him by the plaintiff, as the agent of the plaintiff and not of the defendant. It is not alleged in the complaint nor was there evidence at the trial tending to show that the amount found by the jury to be due on the note was tendered to the defendant by the plaintiff or by M. W. Gant, prior to or during the pendency of the action. There is error in the judgment.
The action is remanded to the Superior Court of Guilford County, that judgment may be entered in said court, fixing the amount due on the note. It was error to enjoin and restrain the defendant, upon the admission in the pleadings, from selling the land described in the complaint under the power of sale contained in the mortgage from Jesse Cole and wife to the defendant.
No error in the trial.
Error in the judgment.