Court Opinion

ID: 8672923
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:38:26.338467+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:22.326872
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Richard Lamont Lighty appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lighty, No. 7:04-cr-00072-sgw-l (W.D.Va. May 23, 2008; June 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.