Court Opinion

ID: 4134647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-18 01:52:50.980408+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:22.802890
License: Public Domain

THE   ATJXBECNEY            GENERAL
                           OPTEXAS

                           February 1, 1967

Honorable John C. Mullen      Opinion No. M-19
County Attorney
Jim Wells County              Re:    Whether a person who has been
Alice, Texas                         convicted of a felony, wherein
                                     the sentence was suspended, and
                                     the judgment of conviction has
                                     not been set aside and the cause
                                     dismissed under the provisions
                                     of Article 780 of the old Code
                                     of Criminal Procedure, is bar-
                                     red from applying for and re-
                                     ceiving probation under the
                                     Misdemeanor Probation Law.
Dear Mr. Mullen:                     Article 42.13, V.C.C.P.
       You have requested this office for an opinion on the
hereinabove set out question.
       Article 42.13, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure,
known as the Misdemeanor Probation Law, provides, among
other conditions, in Section 3(a)(2) thereof, that a de-
fendant who has been found guilty of a misdemeanor wherein
the maximum oermissible punishment is by confinement in jail
or by a fine in excess of $200, may be 'grantedprobation if:
"He has never before been convicted in this or another jur-
isdiction of a felony or of a misdemeanor for which the maxi-
mum permissible punishment is by confinement in jail or ex-
ceeds a $200 fine."
       It has been held that the expression "conviction of
a felony", as used in the suspended sentence law, means that
status resulting from a judgment based on a verdict finding
the accused guilty, and hence includes a conviction where
sentence has been suspended. Hill v. State, 243 S.W. 982
fTex.Crim. 1922); Bradshaw v. State, 81 S g.2d 83 (Tex.Crim.
i935); Edwards    State, llo s w 26 711 (Tex.Crim. 1938).
Whitlock v. Sta,
               eS.W.2d       l&'(Te~,f.?;~m.1933); Thompion
V.
               -m'?A R¶Q (IT*."AYu.
                         /WC..,
               .W.LU "J.7.
   State, 244 L?'             Ir,im d.2>=,.

       Therefore, in view of the above authorities and under
the facts stated, it is the opinion of this office that a
person who has been convicted of a felony wherein the sen-
tence was suspended is barred thereby from applying for and
                         - 76 -
Honorable John C. Mullen, Page 2 (M-19)

receivin probation under the Misdemeanor Probation Law.
Article $2.13, V.C.C.P.
                        SUMMARY
            A person who has been convicted of a
            felony, wherein the sentence was sus-
            pended, and the judgment of conviction
            has not been set aside and the cause
            dismissed under the provisions of Ar-
            ticle 780 of the old Code of Criminal
            Procedure, is barred from applying for
            and receiving probation under the Mis-
            demeanor Probation Law. Article 42.13,
            V.C.C.P.
                                     Y*s    very truly,

                               WAt         rney General of Texas

RLL/dt
Prepared by R. L. Lattimore
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE:
Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
W. V. Geppert, Co-chairman
Sam Kelley
John Banks
Bill Craig
David Longoria
A. J. Carubbi, Jr.
Staff Legal Assistant

                         - 77 -