Court Opinion

ID: 9370699
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-14 17:00:32.278436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:23.158614
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11577    Document: 24-1     Date Filed: 02/14/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11577
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       JOSE FERNANDO PALACIOS-POTE,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00259-KKM-AAS-2
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11577     Document: 24-1      Date Filed: 02/14/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                22-11577

       Before WILSON, JORDAN, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Brian L. Shrader, counsel for Jose Fernando Palacios-Pote in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
       v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
       entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
       of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
       entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, and Palacios-Pote’s conviction and sen-
       tence are AFFIRMED.