Court Opinion

ID: 3768584
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:22:03.788227+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:21:37.797309
License: Public Domain

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).
We overrule defendant-appellant's assignment of error on the basis ofres judicata. See State v. Crenshaw (June 22, 2001), Hamilton App. No. C-000590, unreported.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Doan, P.J., Sundermann and Winkler, JJ.