Court Opinion

ID: 2993714
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-23 20:08:48.361486+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:01:17.875452
License: Public Domain

People v Crosby (2015 NY Slip Op 06928)

People v Crosby

2015 NY Slip Op 06928

Decided on September 23, 2015

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 23, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
L. PRISCILLA HALL
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

2013-09966
 (Ind. No. 13-00389)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, 
vAndre Crosby, appellant.

Anthony N. Iannarelli, Jr., New York, N.Y., for appellant.
David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (Elizabeth L. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), imposed October 7, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Finnegan, 112 AD3d 847; People v Gil, 109 AD3d 484) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
ENG, P.J., RIVERA, HALL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court