Court Opinion

ID: 8450042
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 00:51:24.006464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:58.692253
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Al Gene Fisher, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Fisher contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations because he had inadequate access to the prison law library during prison lock-downs and because he had periods of mental illness. We conclude that Fisher is not entitled to equitable tolling because he has not demonstrated that an extraordinary circumstance stood in his way and prevented timely filing. See Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 127 S.Ct. 1079, 1085, 166 L.Ed.2d 924 (2007).
We deny Fisher’s request for an evidentiary hearing because, even if his allegations are true, he is not entitled to equitable tolling. See Roy v. Lampert, 465 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir.2006).
We deny Fisher’s request for appointment of counsel.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.