Court Opinion

ID: 3325652
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 17:42:44.80694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:01.665471
License: Public Domain

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
The defendant's motion to strike the second count of plaintiff's amended complaint and paragraphs 2 and 3 of plaintiff's prayer for relief is granted. The Court finds that the plaintiff has not alleged facts supporting her claim for reckless conduct. See Doyle v. Christensen, 16 Conn. Law Trib. 33, pp. 31-32 (August 20, 1990, Walsh, J.).
J. F. WALSH, J.