Court Opinion

ID: 989668
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:10:16.390496+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:16.809792
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 95-7930

JAMES WESLEY CONYERS,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

         versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; THOMAS C.
RUFFINO, Warden,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-95-51-2)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                  Decided:   June 27, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Katherine Nicholson, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appel-
lant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Conyers v. North
Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-95-51-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2