Court Opinion

ID: 9565344
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 19:19:25.984052+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:34.389987
License: Public Domain

Quillian, Judge.
The defendant appeals from the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The plaintiff sought recovery on a fire insurance policy with the defendant insurance company which contended that it was not liable because the policy had been canceled before the loss occurred in February, 1975.
As set forth in the trial judge’s order: "The undisputed facts show that defendant issued Policy No. 61MP 128-781 on October 1, 1974. This policy was canceled on October 28, 1974, without any effort of the defendant to comply with Code Ann. § 56-2430. Defendant substituted for the aforesaid policy another fire insurance policy No. 61MP 128-744, without notice to the plaintiff of the substitution. Thereafter, and on December 9, 1974, the defendant notified the plaintiff that Policy No. 61MP 128-744 (the substituted policy) would be canceled on the 10th day after receipt of the notice.” The plaintiff testified that when he made inquiry he was told by defendant’s agent that a mistake had been made and the original policy was still in force. Held:
*243Argued September 14,1976
Decided October 4, 1976
Rehearing denied October 28, 1976
Levine, D’Alessio & Cohn, Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Sam F. Lowe, III, for appellant.
Thomas F. Jones, for appellee.
Upon thorough consideration of the record we agree with the ruling of the trial court that plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment on the issue of liability. There was no cancellation of the original policy. See Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gordon, 126 Ga. App. 215 (1) (190 SE2d 447); Republic Ins. Co. v. Cook, 129 Ga. App. 833 (1) (201 SE2d 668); Motors Ins. Corp. v. Roper, 136 Ga. App. 224, 225 (221 SE2d 55). Hence, the cancellation of another purported policy was of no effect.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.