Court Opinion

ID: 9917056
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-11 16:01:23.204833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:14.029225
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-1644   Document: 56     Page: 1   Filed: 01/11/2024

        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

                   MARTIN KUSTER,
                      Appellant

                            v.

  WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN
  DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SANDISK LLC,
                Cross-Appellants
             ______________________

             2022-1644, 2022-1645, 2022-1713
                 ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
 01391, IPR2020-01410.
                  ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

     DAVID A. REED, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP,
 Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by
 RUSSELL KORN, ANDREW N. SAUL; FREDERICK LEE
 WHITMER, New York, NY.

     L. KIERAN KIECKHEFER, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP,
 San Francisco, CA, argued for cross-appellants. Also rep-
 resented by BRIAN BUROKER, Washington, DC; BLAINE H.
 EVANSON, Irvine, CA.
 Case: 22-1644     Document: 56   Page: 2    Filed: 01/11/2024

                    ______________________

  THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

  ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

      PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, HUGHES and
  CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
                 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                           ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 11, 2024
     Date