Court Opinion

ID: 3123813
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:45:05.473989+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:49:33.069633
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
                          SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                               FORT WORTH

                              NO. 02-10-00358-CV

MICHAEL FARRIS, JR.                                                  APPELLANT

                                        V.

RICHARD HARVEY NEUMAN AND                                            APPELLEES
KAREN NEUMAN

                                    ------------

          FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                    ------------

              MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
                                    ------------

      We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice.” It

is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

      1
       See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
      Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                               PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 5, 2011

                                      2