Court Opinion

ID: 4643200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-12-15 20:00:41.419906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:00:38.573874
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 20-11917    Date Filed: 12/15/2020   Page: 1 of 2

                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 20-11917
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00016-VMC-JSS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

ANDRES ORTIZ ORDONEZ,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.
                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                           (December 15, 2020)

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 20-11917      Date Filed: 12/15/2020   Page: 2 of 2

      Gus M. Centrone, appointed counsel for Andres Ortiz Ordonez in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Ortiz Ordonez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2