Court Opinion

ID: 5724649
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:14:50.195267+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:40:46.319817
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Ernie, J.), rendered May 6, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), the jury could have found that the evidence established the elements of assault in the second degree. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly admitted testimony about inculpating statements made by the deceased victim during her struggle with the defendant as excited utterances (see People v Edwards, 47 NY2d 493, 496 [1979]; People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513 [1987]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Smith, 278 AD2d 154 [2000]). Prudenti, PJ., Fisher, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.