Court Opinion

ID: 9964748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-30 18:01:47.079323+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:41.397706
License: Public Domain

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

                                   Before
                       HOLIFIELD, McCOY, and MIZER
                          Appellate Military Judges

                            _________________________

                              UNITED STATES
                                  Appellee

                                         v.

                       Jalen R. HARRIS
     Hospital Corpsman Petty Officer Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
                             Appellant

                                No. 202300256

                            _________________________

                              Decided: 30 April 2024

      Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                                  Military Judge:
                                   Eric A. Catto

   Sentence adjudged 29 June 2023 by a special court-martial convened at
   Marine Corps Base Hawaii, consisting of a military judge sitting alone.
   Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for
   ten months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1

                              For Appellant:
                   Commander Lindsay W. Pepi, JAGC, USN

   1 Appellant was awarded 113 days of credit for the time he spent on restriction and

in pretrial confinement, along with an extra ten days of judicially ordered credit per
the plea agreement for a total credit of 123 days.
               United States v. Harris, NMCCA No. 202300256
                            Opinion of the Court

                           _________________________

       This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
             NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                           _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case,
we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct
in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. 2
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                  FOR THE COURT:

                                  MARK K. JAMISON
                                  Clerk of Court

   2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

                                         2