Court Opinion

ID: 1260343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 05:16:09.174121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:48.787376
License: Public Domain

230 Ga. 607 (1973)
198 S.E.2d 318
WILLADSEN
v.
WILLADSEN.
27867.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Submitted April 9, 1973.
Decided May 10, 1973.
John N. Crudup. for appellant.
Whelchel, Dunlap & Gignilliat, Weyman H. Forrester, for appellee.
JORDAN, Justice.
This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.
The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.