Court Opinion

ID: 996457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:51:09.79306+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:45.134688
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RICHARD E. CANNON,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-96-792, CA-98-1340-6-20)

Submitted:   September 10, 1998       Decided:   September 29, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard E. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se.     David Calhoun Stephens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Richard E. Cannon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Cannon, Nos. CR-96-792; CA-

98-1340-6-20 (D.S.C. May 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2