Court Opinion

ID: 8434890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 11:12:35.821651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:41.515354
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Javier Samuel Barcenas-Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial of his request to terminate proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and deny the petition for review.
While we deny the government’s request to strike petitioner’s replacement brief, we again remind petitioner’s counsel of his obligation to comply with Fed. R.App. P. 28. See Han v. Stanford Univ., 210 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2000) (“We reiterate our expectation that counsel make a good-faith attempt to comply with the rules of appellate procedure.”).
We have considered petitioner’s arguments concerning adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1255(a) and (i), as well as his contention that he should be allowed to stay in the United States until an immigrant visa becomes available to him. As petitioner has not identified any legal basis for relief, however, we must deny the petition for review.
The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.