Court Opinion

ID: 1014184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:12:37.670177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:37.399434
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 04-6603

LAMAR E. BURGEST, III,

                                               Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

RON WILEY, Warden,

                                                Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-04-115-3)

Submitted:   August 18, 2004                 Decided:   August 25, 2004

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamar E. Burgest, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          Lamar E. Burgest, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).    We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.     See Burgest v. Wiley, No. CA-04-115-3 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 15, 2004).      We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                - 2 -