Court Opinion

ID: 9857828
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 16:02:47.576524+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:46:33.769790
License: Public Domain

CLINTON, Judge,
dissenting.
Anent point of error four, the opinion of the Court is anticlimatic: In Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), *909a majority finally managed “to stay in step with the federal constitutional model for probable cause determinations,” id., at 164. For the reasons developed in my dissenting opinion in that cause, id., at 166 ff, and also in my concurring opinion in Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797, 799 ff, such close order is a drill repugnant to our forebear-ers.
To yet another assault on the sovereignty of this State, I dissent.