Court Opinion

ID: 3086523
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 02:50:17.315376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:06.820253
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-14-00115-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

NIKKI PAIGE ARAGUZ,
CLAIMANT/BENEFICIARY
OF THOMAS T. ARAGUZ, III,
DECEASED,                                                              Appellant,
                                       v.

CITY OF WHARTON, SELF-
INSURED CARRIER, HEATHER
DELGADO, AS PARENT AND
NATURAL GUARDIAN OF TYLER
ARAGUZ AND TREVOR ARAGUZ,
MINOR CHILDREN,                                    Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

             On Appeal from the 329th District Court
                   of Wharton County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                      MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria
                   Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

    Appellant, Nikki Paige Araguz, perfected an appeal in appellate cause number 13-
14-00115-CV from a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County,

Texas, in trial court cause number 45,934. On February 26, 2014, appellant filed an

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal in this Court.         The motion states that on

February 20, 2014, the trial court signed an order withdrawing the judgment from which

appellant sought to appeal. Accordingly, appellant requests that this Court dismiss this

appeal.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Because there is no agreement between the parties concerning appellate

costs, the costs are taxed against appellant.     See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Any pending

motions are dismissed as moot. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
13th day of March, 2014.

                                            2