Court Opinion

ID: 990222
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:18:03.403097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:43.832407
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 96-6507

JOHNNY RUSHING,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF
VIRGINIA,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief
District Judge. (CA-96-276)

Submitted:   August 15, 1996             Decided:   August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Rushing, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Rushing v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-96-276 (E.D.
Va., Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         AFFIRMED

                                2