Court Opinion

ID: 7415960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:36:23.497432+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:16.111659
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date May .21, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve ■no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, suhd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The attorneys for respondent Armando Baldoni are awarded a fee in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.