Court Opinion

ID: 182457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-01-07 19:10:16+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:39.480838
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                FILED
                     ____________________________U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                          ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                           JANUARY 7, 2011
                             No. 10-11923
                                                              JOHN LEY
                         Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                     ____________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cv-01779-EAK-TGW

GARY W. NASH,
BEVERLY J. NASH, his wife,
                                                      Plaintiffs-Appellants,

                                   versus

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.,
DIVINE PROVIDENCE, INC., d/b/a
Divine Providence Food Bank/America’s
Second Harvest of Tampa Bay,
WILLIAM H. MILES,

                                                Defendants-Appellees.
                    ______________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                   ______________________________

                              (January 7, 2011)

Before BLACK, WILSON, and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

      This is an appeal from the grant of defendants’s/appellees’s, Publix Super

Markets, Inc. (Publix), and Divine Providence, Inc., d/b/a Divine Providence Food

Bank/America’s Second Harvest of Tampa Bay (Divine Providence), motions for

summary judgment against plaintiffs/appellants, Gary W. Nash (Nash) and

Beverly J. Nash, on their claims for malicious prosecution and loss of consortium.

The claims arose from a prior criminal prosecution of Nash by the Office of State

Attorney on a 161-count indictment for grand theft, dealing in stolen property,

organized fraud, conspiracy to commit RICO violation, and RICO violation, of

which, in a non-jury trial, Nash was found not guilty on all counts.

      We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs and the arguments of

counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

      AFFIRMED.

                                         2