Court Opinion

ID: 9508658
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 21:36:10.819938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:36.029842
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE McDONOUGH,
dissenting:
The facts in this case clearly show a squabble which escalated between advocates relative to discovery. Such differences are commonplace at the trial court level and are disposed of in the discretion of the trial judge. These orders are interlocutory and non-appealable by our rules for the losing party normally has an adequate remedy on appeal from the final judgment. Here, the decisions relative to discovery did not dispose of any major aspect of the case with any finality, deny any substantive fundamental right which would be prejudicial to the defendant, nor are there any procedural entanglements, This supervision of the trial court is not necessary or proper.
I would deny the writ.
JUSTICE HUNT concurs in the foregoing dissent.