Court Opinion

ID: 8438496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 16:47:34.438553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.300612
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Lewis Baker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled “Motion for Case Review and Reconsideration,” which the district court construed as a motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, No. 5:04-cr-30073-sgw-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2010). We deny Baker’s motion for court records and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.