Court Opinion

ID: 2905706
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 23:24:02.718585+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:42.540185
License: Public Domain

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-299 CV

____________________

JONATHAN HURST, Appellant

V.

JAMES HURST, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court 
Newton County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV-06-1843

MEMORANDUM OPINION 
 On August 3, 2006, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify
a judgment or other appealable order, and that it appeared no judgment or appealable order
has been signed in the case.  No response has been filed.
	The notice of appeal seeks to appeal an order continuing the case.  The trial court has
not signed its final judgment on the case.  No appealable order has been signed by the trial
court.  See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  The appeal is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
	APPEAL DISMISSED.
 
								____________________________
									HOLLIS HORTON
										Justice

Opinion Delivered September 14, 2006 
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.