Court Opinion

ID: 8028188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:53:36.016826+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:53.061684
License: Public Domain

On June 8,1993, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, ten (10) years for Felony Assault; Count II, ten (10) years for Felony Assault; the terms shall be served consecutively for a total of twenty (20) years. The defendant shall receive credit for 147 days and shall be designated a dangerous offender for purposes of parole eligibility.
On November 19,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised, that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
Hon. Thomas McKittrick, Chairman, Hon. 6. Todd Baugh, Member and Hon. Robert Boyd, Alternate Member.