Court Opinion

ID: 8632494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 19:39:50.880485+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:49.163275
License: Public Domain

CRANCH, Chief Judge,
said that this court had entertained jurisdiction, by certiorari, in forcible entry and detainer in several cases, and referred to the case of U. S. v. Donahoo [Case No. 14,982], in this court, at December term, 1S07; and the case of the Lord Proprietary v. Brown, 1 Har. & McH. 428.
THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) quashed the inquisition for uncertainty in the description of the property. “Tenement or storehouse” is too vague.