Court Opinion

ID: 2927408
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 22:52:56.217968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:33.223919
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-07-00736-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

______________________________________________________________
 
BETH ANN CAMPBELL, 	Appellant,

v.

CLIFFORD JAMES BARKER,	Appellee. 
_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Kleberg County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	This matter is before the Court on a defective notice of appeal and appellant's
failure to correct the defect.  On December 14, 2007 and February 15, 2008, the Court
advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 25.1(d),(e) and requested correction of this defect within ten days.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(e), 37.1, 42.3(b),(c).  Appellant responded on February 26,
2008, by filing a motion for continuance to obtain counsel.  The Court granted appellant's
request for a continuance and set an April 7, 2008 deadline for correcting the defect.
	On October 31, 2008, the Court again advised appellant that the notice of appeal
was not in compliance with the appellate rules, and informed appellant that the appeal
would be dismissed if the defect was not cured after the expiration of ten days from the
date of receipt of the Court's notice.  Appellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise
respond to the Court's notices.
	On its own motion, with ten days notice to the parties, an appellate court may
dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a notice from the
clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to
comply with a notice from the Court. See id.
									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 5th day of February, 2009.