Court Opinion

ID: 1004111
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:36:34.199152+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:09.365554
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-6084

TIMOTHY LAMONT HAZEL,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

J. R. HUNT, Superintendent,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-00-564-1)

Submitted:   April 12, 2001                 Decided:   April 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lamont Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Timothy Lamont Hazel seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s*

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).   We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court.   See Hazel v. Hunt, No. CA-00-

564-1 (M.D.N.C. June 9, 2000).   We further deny Hazel’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

     *
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

                                  2