Court Opinion

ID: 9451977
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 17:28:15.450565+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:33:00.474806
License: Public Domain

*591ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
This cause was considered upon appellant’s motion for rehearing. It presents no issues which were not considered previously by the court, and covered in points one and three of the opinion.
Under clear instructions from the trial •court, the jury could have acquitted appellant had it believed his defense — -that the exhibits he introduced into evidence in the Tax Court were intended as mere ■“examples.” The propriety of the instructions has not been questioned in this cause. The verdict of guilty has not been shown to be derived through any misconception of the language of the indictment.
The motion for rehearing is therefore denied.