Court Opinion

ID: 4364653
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-02-05 14:07:15.842074+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:49:13.863390
License: Public Domain

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                 STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                         No. 1D17-2151
                 _____________________________

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,

    Appellant,

    v.

ALICE CISLO,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.
Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

                        February 5, 2019

         ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

    The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this
case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the
matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43
Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In compliance with
the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court’s
dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the
merits of Dyck-O’Neal’s deficiency claim.

    REVERSED and REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and
David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law
Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.

James Dale Gibson, of Gibson, Kohl, Wolff & Hric, P.L., Sarasota,
for Appellee.

                               2