Court Opinion

ID: 9792181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 02:24:40.491666+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:40.977795
License: Public Domain

CARTER, J., Concurring.
In my opinion the writ should issue, but I desire to point out that the unconstitutional discrimination in this case is the same in substance and legal effect as that present by the rule involved in Ferrante v. Fish & Game Commission, ante, p. 365 [175 P.2d 222]. In both cases arbitrary and unreasonable burdens are placed *385upon newcomers in the pilchard sardine industry which are not imposed upon those previously established in the business. There is no reasonable basis for the classification in either case and I reiterate the discussion in my dissent in the Ferrante case.
Schauer, J., concurred.
Respondents’ petition for a rehearing was denied December 30, 1946.