Court Opinion

ID: 4312622
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-14 18:00:19.155416+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:17.303033
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-11143      Document: 00514641805         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/14/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                     United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 17-11143
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                 Conference Calendar               September 14, 2018
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                   Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIPE ROMERO-ARAIZA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:16-CR-414-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Felipe Romero-Araiza has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Romero-Araiza has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as
Romero-Araiza’s response.         We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11143   Document: 00514641805   Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/14/2018

                              No. 17-11143

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.     Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

                                    2