Court Opinion

ID: 8462715
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:33:49.125409+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.690375
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Howard 0. Boisseau, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boisseau, No. 3:00-cr-00245-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2008). We also deny Boisseau’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.