Court Opinion

ID: 1014504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:18:03.386112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:28.970590
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Ricky Lee Vance petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reduction in sentence filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court dismissed Vance’s motion in an order filed on August 27, 2004. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Vance’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   PETITION DENIED