Court Opinion

ID: 9762813
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 02:31:40.445195+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:29:37.706500
License: Public Domain

DALTON, Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur, except as to that part of the opinion holding that the verdict is excessive and requiring a remittitur. I dissent as to this part of the opinion, because I do not believe the issue of mere excessiveness is before us and the issue is not briefed by the parties. The assignment is that “the verdict of the jury is excessive because it included damages for an injury not sustained in his fall.” No relief by remittitur is requested. Appellant contends “the verdict is so grossly excessive that it cannot be cured by remittitur, and it should, therefore, be reversed.”
I would affirm the judgment.