Court Opinion

ID: 1830
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-16 00:41:11+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:42.263278
License: Public Domain

FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             APR 15 2010

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 09-10059

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00435-GMS

  v.

JOSE VICTOR QUIROA-ARIAS,                         MEMORANDUM *

               Defendant - Appellant.

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                              for the District of Arizona
                      G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

                               Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before:        RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

       Jose Victor Quiroa-Arias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-

month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Quiroa-Arias’

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Quiroa-Arias the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                    09-10059