Court Opinion

ID: 9665494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:49:48.622076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:16.104507
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
HOLMES, Judge.
Able and distinguished counsel for appellant, in his application for rehearing, points out that this court inadvertently quoted the present Tit. 26, § 279(c)(6), Code of Ala., when, in fact, the appropriate Code section in this case is Tit. 26, § 279(c)(6), as it existed prior to the 1973 amendment. He is correct.
Tit. 26, § 279(c)(6), on page 780 of our opinion should read as follows :
“In all other cases of permanent partial disability not above enumerated, the compensation shall be sixty-six and two thirds percent of the difference between the average weekly earnings of the workman at the time of the injury and the average weekly earnings he is able to earn in his partially disabled condition subject to the same maximum weekly compensation as stated in section 289 of this title.”
Opinion extended; application for rehearing overruled.
WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.