Court Opinion

ID: 4672686
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-03-30 14:14:14.849175+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:08.791788
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                    NO. 03-21-00079-CR

                            Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas, Appellant

                                              v.

                                The State of Texas, Appellee

                 FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
            NO. 58060, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

              On November 20, 2006, in trial-court cause number 58060, a jury found appellant

Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child, see Tex. Penal Code

§ 22.021(a)(1)(B), (2)(B), and the trial court sentenced appellant to serve ninety years in the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07(2)(b); Tex. Penal

Code § 12.32. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction. See Guel-Rivas

v. State, No. 03-06-00762-CR, 2007 WL 4208341, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 30, 2007, pet.

ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandate affirming the trial court’s

judgment of conviction was issued July 21, 2008.1

       1 Appellant subsequently filed an application for postconviction writ of habeas corpus,
see Tex. Code Crim Proc. art. 11.07, § 1, which the Court of Criminal Appeals denied. See
website of Court of Criminal Appeals, https://search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=WR-72,069-
01&coa=coscca.
               On February 22, 2021, this Court received appellant’s pro se notice of appeal

seeking to appeal the judgment of conviction entered against him in trial-court cause number

58060. Appellant has already appealed his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child,

and mandate has issued. He is not entitled to a second appeal of this conviction. See Hines

v. State, 70 S.W. 955, 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1902) (“[O]nly one appeal can be made from a

verdict and judgment of conviction in any case.”). Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction

to consider a second appeal from appellant’s final conviction.          See McDonald v. State,

401 S.W.3d 360, 361–62 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2013, pet. ref’d) (concluding that court was

without jurisdiction to entertain repeated attempts to appeal when defendant had already received

appellate review of his conviction).

               Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.2 See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f); see, e.g., Wiggins v. State, No. 03-20-00401-CR, 2020 WL 5884121, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Austin Sept. 29, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing for want

of jurisdiction defendant’s subsequent appeal of conviction that had previously been affirmed);

Arabzadegan v. State, No. 03-19-00728-CR, 2020 WL 370880, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin

Jan. 23, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same).

       2  In connection with this attempted second appeal, appellant has filed several motions in
this Court. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
                                                 2
                                           __________________________________________
                                           Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 30, 2021

Do Not Publish

                                              3