Court Opinion

ID: 994895
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:29:38.429643+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:58.175261
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7233

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

         versus

DAVID BELL,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-370, CA-97-1575-7)

Submitted:    January 30, 1998               Decided:   May 5, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bell, Appellant Pro Se. David Clahoun Stephens, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Bell, Nos. CR-93-370; CA-
97-1575-7 (D.S.C. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2