Court Opinion

ID: 9728058
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 13:56:57.341059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:25:45.480763
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Rehearing.
STRUTZ, Judge.
The appellant has filed a petition for rehearing, contending that, while she did not demand a trial de novo in her notice of appeal, the sense of an appeal for trial de novo was intended; that appellant should not be denied substantial justice because of a technical ruling on appellate procedure.
We do not view our opinion in this case as being based on a technical ruling on appellate procedure. However, in order to determine whether the appellant had substantial rights which were being denied to her by our holding, we have made a thorough examination of the entire record and have come to the conclusion that a hearing on the merits would avail her nothing. The order of the district court would, on the merits, be affirmed.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
BURKE, C. J., and TEIGEN, ERICK-STAD and KNUDSON, JJ„ concur.