Court Opinion

ID: 9910991
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-19 01:00:35.315114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:55:23.345157
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-30082         Document: 00517005667             Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/18/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                           FILED
                                                                                      December 18, 2023
                                       No. 23-30082                                     Lyle W. Cayce
                                      ____________                                           Clerk

   U.S. Alliance Group, Incorporated,

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellant,

                                             versus

   Cardtronics USA, Incorporated,

                                                Defendant—Appellee.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                               USDC No. 2:21-CV-1074
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          Appellant U.S. Alliance Group, Inc. appeals the district court’s order
   granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Cardtronics USA, Inc. and
   dismissing USAG’s suit against Cardtronics as barred by the release of claims
   provision contained in a separate settlement agreement between USAG and
   third-party LibertyX. We agree with the district court and AFFIRM for
   essentially the reasons stated in the thorough opinion by the district court.

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.