Court Opinion

ID: 5763232
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:18:11.979157+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:24.902870
License: Public Domain

The petition was properly dismissed where the contract did not include an escalator clause or other provision for additional compensation, and the Board rationally found (see Secco Elec. Corp. v Kalikow, 13 AD3d 252 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]) that the Department of Sanitation did not breach either the contract provision or the Procurement Policy Board’s rules *264regarding procurement and substitution of sole source items. Concur—Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Nardelli, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.