Court Opinion

ID: 992673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:56:00.31669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:55.683432
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-7187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

FRED HAMMOND, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-172-D, CA-95-768-1)

Submitted:   July 24, 1997                 Decided:   July 31, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Hammond, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.     Benjamin H. White, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommenda-

tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States   v.   Hammonds,   Nos.   CR-92-172-D,   CA-95-768-1   (M.D.N.C.

July 11, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                    2