Court Opinion

ID: 9845499
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 03:23:08.652421+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:10.378695
License: Public Domain

BRETT, Presiding Judge,
concurs in part and dissents in part:
I concur that this conviction is sufficiently sustained; however, I dissent to the hearsay testimony that consent was granted to record the telephone conversation. For the same reason I dissented to the decision in Helfrich v. State, 640 P.2d 1367 (Okl.Cr.1982). Further, insofar as appellant was found to be indigent at trial, as well as for appeal, I would modify the fine from $5,000.00 to $500.00.