Court Opinion

ID: 4846112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-23 19:00:43.416517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:46.628383
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 20-7244

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

OMAR DIAZ-RIOS,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00021-REP-2)

Submitted: August 19, 2021                                        Decided: August 23, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omar Diaz-Rios, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Omar Diaz-Rios appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district

court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Diaz-Rios, No. 3:10-cr-00021-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2020). We deny

Diaz-Rios’ motion to compel judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                            AFFIRMED

                                           2