Court Opinion

ID: 9675216
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 04:45:28.63802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:54.464691
License: Public Domain

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
Both the appellee and appellant have submitted their respective motions for rehearing in this cause.
In appellee’s motion, among other matters, the request was made that this court’s opinion b'e clarified as to whether the judgment of the trial court was reversed and remanded in its entirety or only as to the portion of the judgment dealing with the division of the community property of the marriage. Since the appeal challenged only that portion of the judgment relating to the division of the community property, it was not our intention to reverse any portion of the judgment pertaining to the divorce, child custody and support. Since neither party has assigned error with respect to the trial court’s judgment relating to matters other than the division of community property and to clarify the effect of our original opinion, we hereby amend such opinion to the extent that we affirm the trial court’s judgment concerning the granting of the divorce, awarding the custody and providing for the support of the minor child; however, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings solely upon the matter of the division of the community property. Blair v. Blair, 105 S.W.2d 331, 332 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1937, no writ); Jackson v. Jackson, 251 S.W. 520, 521 (Tex.Civ.App. — Galveston 1923, no writ).
We have considered appellee’s other grounds set out in his motion for rehearing, and for the reasons set out in our original opinion, we overrule such motion except to the extent above stated.
Also we have reviewed the various points set out in appellant’s motion for rehearing. After due consideration of the motion, we have determined that for the reasons stated in our original opinion, the same should be and is hereby overruled.