Court Opinion

ID: 4696101
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-16 18:00:30.491154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:00:30.565049
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-11240      Document: 00515902192         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/16/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                            Fifth Circuit

                                                                          FILED
                                                                      June 16, 2021
                                  No. 19-11240                       Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                        Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Nathan Neal Williams,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:19-CR-184-1

   Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nathan Neal
   Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Williams has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-11240    Document: 00515902192          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/16/2021

                                  No. 19-11240

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2