Court Opinion

ID: 9509468
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-06 21:46:29.529464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:07:49.512567
License: Public Domain

JUSTICE TRIEWEILER
dissenting in part and specially concurring in part.
For the reasons set forth in my dissent to the majority’s decision in Dew v. Dower (1993), 258 Mont. 114, 852 P.2d 549 (Dew II), I dissent from the majority’s holding that Robert Dew was entitled to recover only one-half of the damages caused by defendants’fraudulent conduct.
However, I concur with that part of the majority opinion which reverses the District Court’s application of the offset to which Robert Dew is entitled against the contract purchase price.
JUSTICE HUNT joins in the foregoing dissenting and concurring opinion.