Court Opinion

ID: 8465221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:57:11.511889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:12.781857
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Wayne Wade appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion, which was based on the recent crack cocaine amendments to the sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wade, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-9 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.