Court Opinion

ID: 1026946
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:14:54.312674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:26.648141
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 08-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

ALPHELIOUS ANTOINE ROOKS,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2)

Submitted:    October 15, 2008              Decided:   October 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphelious Antoine Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.

2008)   motion.     We   have    reviewed   the    record   and   find   no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.          United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-

00312-RLW-2 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2008).             We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                     2