Court Opinion

ID: 3380646
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:27:55.115472+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:46.735866
License: Public Domain

This cause is before us on return to rule nisi in prohibition proceedings.
It appears that in habeas corpus proceedings the circuit court ordered the respondent there to produce the body of an infant Eleanor Jean Hamilton before the court. The record shows that the infant was not in the custody of respondent and was not within the jurisdiction of State Courts of Florida and has not been within such jurisdiction since the year 1937; that since 1937 the said infant has been in the State of Michigan in the custody of Mr. and Mrs. V.F. Dewey and beyond the control of the respondent.
Regardless of this showing, the circuit court has entered a judgment holding the respondent to be in contempt of court for failure to produce the body of the said infant.
The judgment, supra, is reviewable on habeas corpus proceedings but may not be reached in this proceeding.
The circuit court has the power and jurisdiction to adjudge parties before the court to be in contempt of court and may exercise that power either erroneously or properly subject to review in the appellate court on habeas corpus. See Ex Parte
Peaden, 88 Fla. 273, 102 So. 160; Hazen v. Smith, 101 Fla. 767,  135 So. 813; Ex Parte Turner, 73 Fla. 360, 74 So. 314;Ex Parte Bostwick, 102 Fla. 995, 136 So. 669; Ex Parte Earman,85 Fla. 297, 95 So. 755, 31 A. L. R. 1226.
It, therefore, follows that the rule nisi issued here must be quashed.
So ordered.
  BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD and ADAMS, J. J., concur. *Page 12