Court Opinion

ID: 8462211
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:18:29.775667+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.210277
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Desmond Peterson appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peterson, No. 3:94-cr-00046-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.