Court Opinion

ID: 7703876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 18:59:25.807428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:26:55.174790
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for a new trial. It was error to admit trial testimony as to a horizontal gaze nystagmus test performed by the arresting officer without laying a predicate for its admission as scientific evidence. See State v. Meador, 674 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Melvin v. State, 677 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.