Court Opinion

ID: 9518579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 00:56:16.541419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:26:43.500579
License: Public Domain

*1281OPINION ON REHEARING
In his petition for rehearing, Arthur Simmons has called our attention to two errors in our opinion handed down August 28, 1991. We grant rehearing to correct those errors.
In our original opinion we stated that Simmons did not raise the issue of Carter's representation by a non-attorney in his motion to set aside the judgment. While that statement was correct as to Simmons's written motion, at the hearing on the motion, Simmons orally moved to amend his motion to include that issue. The motion to amend was granted. Thus, Simmons did raise the issue.
We also stated on page ___ of the slip opinion: "Here, Simmons is a natural person, not a corporation, and either had to appear pro se or by counsel." We should have stated that Carter was a natural person. We amend that portion of our opinion to read: "Here, Carter is a natural person, not a corporation, and either had to appear pro se or by counsel." [Editor's Note: Correction made for publication of this opinion]. -
In all other respects, we confirm our opinion of August 28, 1991.
SHIELDS and CONOVER, JJ., concur.