Court Opinion

ID: 9911622
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-20 16:03:41.608594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:51:58.833652
License: Public Domain

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                                FOURTH DISTRICT

     SAAD REMODELING & CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS, INC., and
                     SAAD HOME, INC.,
                        Appellants,

                                        v.

                        REYES FC SERVICES CORP.,
                                Appellee.

                               No. 4D2023-1006

                             [December 20, 2023]

   Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Terri-Ann Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO21-000406.

   Michael Garcia of Michael Garcia, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

  Kristie Hatcher-Bolin of GrayRobinson, P.A., Lakeland, and Carlos
Reyes of GrayRobinson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.
GROSS, J., concurs specially with opinion.

GROSS, J., concurring specially.

  Appellants are general contractors. Appellee is a subcontractor who
had been retained by appellants to perform certain work.

   In the county court, the subcontractor filed a three-count complaint
against appellants. Each count was based on a separate worthless check
delivered by appellants for work done. The complaint sought relief under
section 68.065, Florida Statutes (2018). 1

1 One of the checks was written in 2018 and two were written in 2020.     For ease
of reference, this opinion will use 2018 as the year of the statute, as the statute
has not changed during those years.
   The subcontractor voluntarily dismissed one count of the complaint.
The trial court ruled in appellants’ favor on a second count. On the third
count, the trial court awarded the subcontractor $1,500 in damages and
$4,500 in treble damages, pursuant to section 68.065(3)(a).

   Appellants moved for an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to
section 68.065, arguing that they were the prevailing party on two of the
three counts of the complaint. The trial judge denied the motion for fees.

    One reason that affirmance is proper is that section 68.065 does not
authorize an award of fees to defendant makers or drawers of dishonored
checks who ultimately prevail on a statutory claim. Section 68.065(3)(a)
provides, among other things, that “[t]he maker or drawer [of a bad check]
is also liable for any court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by
the payee in taking the action.” § 68.065(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018). Similarly,
section 68.065(6), in describing a pretrial disposition of a case, says that
“the maker or drawer is liable to the payee for all attorney fees and
collection costs incurred by payee as a result of the payee’s claim.” §
68.065(6), Fla. Stat. (2018).

   Thus, the plain language of the statutes makes fees recoverable only by
the payee of a bad check, not by its maker or drawer. Appellants were the
makers or drawers of checks upon which the lawsuit was based, not the
payees. There was no statutory basis for an award of attorney’s fees to
them.

   The predecessor of section 68.065, Florida Statutes, provided for
attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in a statutory civil action:

      In any civil action brought for the purpose of collecting a
      check, draft, or order of payment, the payment of which was
      refused by the drawee because of the lack of funds or credit,
      the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to
      recover from the non-prevailing party the prevailing
      party’s reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection.

Ch. 79-345, § 2, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 832.07, Fla. Stat. (1979))
(emphasis added).

   However, under the 1986 amendments to both section 68.065 and
section 832.07, only the maker or drawer of a check is made liable for
court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the payee in taking
the recovering action. The reciprocal prevailing party attorney’s fees

                                      2
provision was completely removed in 1986, and this change has remained
in force to the present day. See Ch. 86-89, § 1, Laws of Fla. (codified at §
68.065, Fla. Stat. (1986)) (“In any civil action brought for the purpose of
collecting a check, . . . the payment of which was refused by the drawee
because of the lack of funds, . . . [t]he maker or drawer shall also be liable
for any court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the payee in
taking the action.”); see also Ch. 86-89, § 2, Laws of Fla. (codified at §
832.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1986)) (“[The maker or drawer] may be additionally
liable in a civil action for triple the amount of the check, . . . court costs,
[and] reasonable attorney fees . . . as provided in s. 68.065.”).

   Cases treating section 68.065 as a prevailing party attorney’s fee
statute are likely referring to the pre-1986 version of the statute. See, e.g.,
Maulden v. Corbin, 537 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). As noted above,
the current version of section 68.065 does not contain a reciprocal
prevailing party attorney’s fees provision.

   I am aware of no statute that would override the specific language of
section 68.065. Section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2018), applies to
attorney’s fee provisions in contracts “entered into on or after October 1,
1988,” not to statutory provisions allowing for fees.

                             *        *         *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                      3