Court Opinion

ID: 9352088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-04 21:01:09.490502+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:57.434747
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10603    Document: 35-1     Date Filed: 01/04/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10603
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       EBODIA RODRIGUEZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cr-00170-TPB-JSS-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10603      Document: 35-1     Date Filed: 01/04/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-10603

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Adam Paul Labonte, counsel for Ebodia Rodriguez in this
       direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
       sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
       California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
       tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
       the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
       tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
       withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s conviction and sentence
       are AFFIRMED.