Court Opinion

ID: 8064024
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 04:42:42.264743+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:06.745488
License: Public Domain

Pee Cueiam.
This case was argued with the case of Newark v. Tunis, ante p. 461, decided at the present term. It is similar in its essential facts, and is controlled by the decision in the Tunis case. For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment of the Supreme Court ivill be affirmed.
*533For affirmance—The Chaftcelloe, Chief Justice, Teeftchabd, Paekee, Bebgeft, Bogeet, Yeedeftbuegh, Coftgdoft, White, JJ. 9.
For reversal—None.