Court Opinion

ID: 1006146
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:06:51.178085+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:26.157712
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6981

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EDWARD ALLEN PINEIRO,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-97-37, CA-00-341-7)

Submitted:   October 31, 2001          Decided:     December 18, 2001

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Allen Pineiro, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OF-
FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Edward Allan Pineiro seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Pineiro, Nos. CR-97-37;

CA-00-341-7 (W.D. Va. May 15, 2001).        We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2