Court Opinion

ID: 990354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:20:10.717459+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:44.182236
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-1593

PATRICIA D. BAKER,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR.,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-95-822-5-CV-BO)

Submitted:   September 5, 1996        Decided:   September 13, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia D. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Baker v. Runyon, No. CA-95-822-5-CV-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2