Court Opinion

ID: 8123426
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:02:58.615573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:06.851382
License: Public Domain

Benedict, J.
This is a motion by the accused to be discharged on his own recognizance, or that his trial do immediately proceed. The ground of the application is that the accused was ready to be tried at the February term, and attended court during the term, and pressed the district attorney to try his case, but the district attorney omitted to call up the case, although the trial might have been had, and no sufficient reason existed for omitting to call up the case. The affidavits show that the accused was in court, pressing for a trial of his case at the February term, and I am by no means satisfied with the reasons assigned by the district attorney for his omission to call up the case. So far as the business of the court is concerned there was abundant opportunity to try the case at the February term, and I think it ought to have been called up. I do not, however, think it advisable to discharge the accused upon his own recognizance at this term. He is on bail, and the bail given will stand until the next term in March. If, at the opening of that term, an early day be not fixed by the district attorney for the disposition of the case, the present motion may be renewed.