Court Opinion

ID: 4704638
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-07-19 18:00:37.69186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:29.294979
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40879      Document: 00515942378         Page: 1     Date Filed: 07/19/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                  No. 20-40879                          July 19, 2021
                                Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                            Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Antonio Toledo-Cruz,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:20-CR-1051-1

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Toledo-
   Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
   Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
   229 (5th Cir. 2011). Toledo-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40879     Document: 00515942378          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/19/2021

                                   No. 20-40879

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2