Court Opinion

ID: 992209
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:48:35.795036+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:33.515701
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7250

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-79-25-N, CA-95-740)

Submitted:   November 30, 1995              Decided:      May 23, 1997

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge,     NIEMEYER,    Circuit    Judge,   and
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Williams, Nos. CR-79-25-N; CA-95-740 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2