Court Opinion

ID: 9671712
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:42:21.774478+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:11.605394
License: Public Domain

MORGAN, Justice
(dissenting).
I dissent.
Twin City claimed that it is entitled to prejudgment interest on at least the sum of $1,936.38, which sum Smith testified was, in his opinion, the value of the services. The trial court directed a verdict for Twin City in at least that amount. In his brief, Smith concedes that if Twin City is entitled to interest at all, it cannot exceed interest on that sum and running from the date of the last billing. The majority opinion does not even discuss this sub-issue and I dissent because I would reverse and remand with instructions to add prejudgment interest on the amount of $1,936.58, computed from July 9, 1984, the date of the last billing.
I am authorized to state that HENDERSON, J., joins in this dissent.