Court Opinion

ID: 5360594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 07:22:56.458906+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:29:52.156536
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Action on a written lease to recover unpaid rent. The essential facts were undisputed. Whether or not there was an acceptance of a surrender of the premises was at best, so far as the appellants were concerned, a question of fact for the jury. (Levitt v. Zindler, 136 App. Div. 695; Tootle Theatre Co. v. Shubert Theatrical Co., 175 id. 530.) The evidence was ample to justify a finding that there had been no acceptance. It may well be that as a matter of law there was no acceptance.
The provisions respecting the deposit of $450 did not constitute that sum liquidated damages. The real damages in the event of a breach could be readily ascertained and computed. The deposit, therefore, of that sum was merely as security. (Emsheimer v. Thorner, 83 Misc. 432; Caesar v. Rubinson, 174 N. Y. 492; Stimpson v. Minsker Realty Co., 177 App. Div. 536.)
The judgment for the plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs.
Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county unanimously affirmed, with costs.