Court Opinion

ID: 4232298
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-12-25 14:23:10.954866+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:02.371543
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-87,725-01

                      EX PARTE BRYAN EUGENE GARNER, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
           CAUSE NO. F-2013-1344-E WHC 1 IN THE 367th DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM DENTON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child in count one and continuous sexual abuse of a child in count two and he was sentenced to life

imprisonment in each count. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Garner v. State,

No. 02-15-00171-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 11, 2016) (not designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

in this case. The trial court does not specifically address the contents of Applicant’s ground for relief

and, without explanation, recommends relief be denied because Applicant has not met his “burden
                                                                                                      2

of showing the probability of a different result in his trial absent the alleged errors of his trial

counsel.” However, Applicant’s ground for relief alleges twelve specific allegations of ineffective

assistance of trial counsel which he further explains in a lengthy attached memorandum.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the

appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
                                                                                               3

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 20, 2017
Do not publish