Court Opinion

ID: 9662566
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 23:13:17.848473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:14:40.770756
License: Public Domain

Boslaugh, J.,
dissenting.
If the associate county judge construed the will of the deceased in entering the order of distribution, it was at most erroneous, not “void or subject to collateral attack.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-520 (Reissue 1985). If the order was otherwise correct, it was at most error without prejudice.
Upon appeal to the district court, all questions of law were determined anew. The order of the district court affirming the order of the county court cured any error there may have been in the order of distribution entered in the county court.