Court Opinion

ID: 3388600
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 18:46:23.000147+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:53:02.215372
License: Public Domain

[EDITORS' NOTE:  THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 270 
In this cause Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed *Page 271 
or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So.2d Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.
BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.
                          ON REHEARING.