Court Opinion

ID: 2923246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:28:21.804426+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:34.439561
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-06-291-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_____________________________________________________________
 
                     IN RE: MAX YORK AND TINA
YORK                                              
_____________________________________________________________
 
                      On Petition for Writ of
Mandamus _____________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
 
Relators, Max York and
Tina York, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above
cause on June 2, 2006. 
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the responses filed by real parties in interest, is
of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief
sought.  Accordingly, relators' petition
for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Furthermore, on June
2, 2006, this Court granted relators' motion to stay all trial court
proceedings in cause number C-2009-05-E in Hidalgo County, pending our review
of the petition for writ of mandamus. 
Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.
PER CURIAM
 
 
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 21st day of June, 2006.
 

[1]
See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen
denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing
opinions and memorandum opinions).