Court Opinion

ID: 2961385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:42:40.352268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:55.833619
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          May 26, 1992                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                                 ___________________          No. 92-1222                                              EUGENE B. BOWLER,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                              GOVERNOR OF MAINE, ET AL.,                                Defendant, Appellees.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE                     [Hon. David M. Cohen, U.S. Magistrate Judge]                                           _____________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,                                     ____________________                              and Selya, Circuit Judge.                                         _____________                                 ___________________               Eugene B. Bowler on brief pro se.               ________________               Michael  E.  Carpenter,  Attorney  General,  and  Peter   H.               ______________________                            __________          Stewart, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.          _______                                  __________________                                 __________________                  Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the parties's  briefs and                 __________            the  record on  appeal.    We  affirm  the  judgment  of  the            magistrate judge essentially  for the reasons  stated in  the            memorandum decision and order, dated February 14, 1992.                 Affirmed.                 _________