Court Opinion

ID: 9830023
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:49:37.959833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:08:29.091560
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
On motion for rehearing appellant contends that this court was in error in. stating in its original opinion that “appellee was knocked to the floor and that he never regained his feet until he was dragged out of the cafe about the time the fight ended.”
On re-examination of the record we find that there was testimony to the effect that appellee regained his feet after the fight began. The record shows, however, that the fight started in the front part of the cafe, .some twenty feet from where Carl Dixon was seated with his brother, L. W. Dixon, and Robert Terry. Roy Corona, the proprietor of the cafe, testified that after the fight started Carl Dixón “got up and went to fighting too.”
This correction in no way affects the final determination of this case as embodied in our former opinion.
Motion for rehearing is refused.
Refused.