Court Opinion

ID: 2964093
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:20:20.6833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:38.619999
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          April 10, 1996
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-2173

                                   MICHAEL J. DEE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                           JANET RENO, Attorney General and
               ANDREW KETTERER, Attorney General of the State of Maine,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________
                                 ____________________

            Michael J. Dee on brief pro se.
            ______________
            Jay  P. McCloskey,  United  States  Attorney,  and Evan  J.  Roth,
            _________________                                  ______________
        Assistant U.S. Attorney on brief for appellee, Attorney General Reno.
            Andrew  Ketterer,  Attorney   General,  James  D.   Williams  III,
            ________________                        _________________________
        Assistant Attorney  General, and  Thomas D. Warren,  Chief, Litigation
                                          ________________
        Division, Assistant  Attorney General,  on brief for  appellee, Andrew
        Ketterer.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________
                      Per  Curiam.     Plaintiff/appellant  Michael   Dee
                      ___________

            challenges  a  district court  discretionary decision  not to

            entertain a  declaratory judgment  action.  We  have reviewed

            the parties' briefs and  the record on appeal and  affirm the

            judgment essentially  for the reasons stated  by the district

            court in its order dated September 11, 1995.

                      Affirmed.
                      _________

                                         -3-