Court Opinion

ID: 7421362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:42:36.231151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:20.743932
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been nó deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
*612The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.