Court Opinion

ID: 5430868
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:53:24.957657+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:37.566048
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

There can be no question but that section 164 of the Civil Practice Act as amended in 1934 (L. 1934, ch. 504), governed the service of the summons in this proceeding in 1936. The case of Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pirkig (191 Misc. 926), therefore, does not apply.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and judgment reinstated.
Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Hoestadter, J., concurs in result.
Order reversed, etc.