Court Opinion

ID: 9367054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-30 19:03:04.691868+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:56.373417
License: Public Domain

FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

                                                  Electronically Filed
                                                  Intermediate Court of Appeals
                                                  CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
                                                  30-JAN-2023
                                                  07:52 AM
                                                  Dkt. 54 OCOR

                           NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

                 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

                         OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

                                  –––O0O–––

            HAWAIIAN DREDGING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
                    Intervenor-Appellant-Appellee,
                                    v.
              NAN, INC., Petitioner-Appellee-Appellant,
                                   and
                         BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY,
                     Respondent-Appellee-Appellee,
                                   and
                DESIREE L. HIKIDA, HEARINGS OFFICER,
                 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS,
            DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS,
                STATE OF HAWAI#I, Appellees-Appellees

          APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                      (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

                           ORDER OF CORRECTION
                 (By:   Wadsworth, J., for the court1/)

          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court
filed on October 31, 2022, is corrected as follows:
          On page 2, fifth line from the bottom, insert "(HDD)"
between the word "Drilling" and the closing bracket so that the
line reads:

            specific [Horizontal Directional Drilling ( HDD)]
            experience"; and (3)

     1/
            Ginoza, Chief Judge, and Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.
 FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

          On page 3, line 7 of the first paragraph under the
heading "I. Background," delete the words "horizontal
directional drilling" and remove the parentheses and bold
typeface from "(HDD)" so that the line reads:

          other things, HDD beneath an

          On page 5, at the end of the last line of the first
block quote, delete the closing quotation mark so that the line
reads:

          days before the date fixed for opening of bids . . . .

          On page 12, in the fourth line of the first full
paragraph, replace "127," with the word "at" so that the line
reads:

          bid solicitation.   138 Hawai#i at 319-21, 382 P.3d at 131-33.

          On page 14, in line 13 of the first full paragraph,
please replace the en dash between the words "protest" and "that"
with an em dash so that the line reads:

          part of Nan's protest — that it was determined to be a

          On page 15, in the eighth line of the block quote, the
order of the punctuation marks in brackets should be reversed so
that the period is followed by the quotation mark. The line
should read:

          disruption to procurements and contract performance[."]    The

          On page 16, third line from the bottom, replace "U.S."
with "United States" so that the line reads:

          to a public contract); see also VS2, LLC v. United States,
          155 Fed. Cl.

          On page 17, first line from the top, replace "U.S."
with "United States" so that the line reads:

          Aarsleff A/S v. United States, 829 F.3d 1303, 1309 (Fed.
          Cir. 2016)

          On page 17, third line from the top, replace "U.S."
with "United States" so that the line reads:

                                     2
 FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
          United States, 370 F.3d 1153, 1159 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (bid
          protest action:

          On page 18, line 14 of the first full paragraph, add an
"s" to the word "Hearing" so that the line reads:

          the Solicitation.   The Hearings Officer erred in concluding

          On page 19, in the first and second lines of both
footnotes 9 and 10, please replace the en dashes with em dashes
so that the first and second lines in footnote 9 read:

                To the extent this conclusion — that the Contractor
          Questionnaire was not part of the Solicitation — can be
          viewed as a mixed issue of fact and

and the first and second lines in footnote 10 read:

                To the extent this conclusion — that the Solicitation
          did not require bidders to submit their HDD experience or
          its equal or equivalent —

          The clerk of the court is directed to take all
necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this
correction.

          DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 30, 2023.

                                         /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
                                         Associate Judge

                                     3