Court Opinion

ID: 8143078
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:17:25.487815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:33.271733
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18, 21; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101, 105; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U. S. 309, 326; (2) Allen v. Georgia, 166 U. S. 138, 140; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123, 129; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78; Jordan v. Massachusetts, 225 U. S. 167; (3) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. *649596, 600; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
Mr. Ralph D. Hurst and Mr. Thomas H. Greevy for the appellant. Mr. C. Ward Eicher, Mr. George E. Barron and Mr. Cecil E. Heller for the appellee.