Court Opinion

ID: 992302
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:50:03.596103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:34.871937
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WILLIE JAMES JONES, a/k/a Ricky Jones,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-285)

Submitted:   May 29, 1997                   Decided:   June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie James Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for disclosure of a grand jury concurrence form. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Jones, No. CR-93-285 (D.S.C.
Oct. 3, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for extraordinary relief

and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2