Court Opinion

ID: 9711346
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 04:29:46.144901+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:23:03.969795
License: Public Domain

DARDEN, J., and CRONE, J.,
coneur.
ORDER
This Court heretofore handed down its opinion 'in this case which affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion, which opinion was marked Memorandum Decision, Not for Publication.
~The Appellant," by counsel, thereafter filed a Verified Motion for Publication, alleging that said opinion should be published, alleging that case law is sparse in denying or limiting appellate appointment for clearly indigent defendants and there exists an overriding threat of denial of *178counsel if such appellate fees are allowed to curtail an indigent defendant's appeal.
The Court having examined said Motion, having reviewed its opinion in this appeal and being duly advised, now finds that said Verified Motion for Publication should be granted, and this Court's opinion heretofore handed down as a Memorandum Decision should now be ordered published.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Appellant's Verified Motion for Publication is GRANTED, and this Court's opinion heretofore handed down in this cause on October 13, 2005, marked Memorandum Decision, Not for Publication, is now ordered published.
All Panel Judges concur.