Court Opinion

ID: 8417421
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 17:26:25.190257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:18.215628
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
David and Tracene Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hawkins v. Berdeguez, No. CA-01-47-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.