Court Opinion

ID: 8905112
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-27 01:48:02.924674+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:08:06.343226
License: Public Domain

WALLACE, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
While I sympathetically agree with Judge Kennedy’s statement that “it has not been clearly demonstrated that the rule of fifty percent apportionment is a necessary and proper implementation of [the Indians’] treaty rights,” I am compelled to join with Judge Goodwin based upon our prior decision in United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).