Court Opinion

ID: 997952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:04:07.768824+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:35.224879
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7226

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AL M. HARB,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-94-21, CA-97-486-3)

Submitted:    February 11, 1999         Decided:    February 23, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Al M. Harb, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville Douglass, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Harb, Nos. CR-94-21; CA-97-486-3

(E.D. Va. June 9, 1998).     We deny Appellant’s motion for the

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2