Court Opinion

ID: 989634
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:09:57.010339+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:16.491945
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6006

FRANKLIN R. LAWRENCE,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
GARY DIXON; JOE PRATT, Lieutenant; SERGEANT
MCLAUGHLIN; OFFICER PACE; DOCTOR BALOCH;
DOCTOR LINCOLN,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-94-194-5-BO)

Submitted:   June 20, 1996                 Decided:   June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin R. Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lawrence v. North
Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-194-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov.

20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2