Court Opinion

ID: 9686689
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 16:01:06.113512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:21.379065
License: Public Domain

ANDERSON, PAUL H„ Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent for many of the same legal reasons articulated by Justices Alan Page and Russell A. Anderson in their separate dissents. We grant great deference to the district court in these matters, as Justice Page so clearly points out in his dissent. See Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 365, 111 S.Ct. 1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991). Therefore, I conclude that on the facts of this case, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Reiners’ peremptory challenge against this prospective juror.