Court Opinion

ID: 9784187
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 20:39:36.156212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:50.424145
License: Public Domain

BROWN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the majority’s determination that neither the language nor the history of article I, section 2, subdivision (a) of the California Constitution supports an intent on the part of the drafters to include a damages remedy for violation of our state free speech clause. For the reasons set forth in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Katzberg v. Regents of University of California (2002) 29 Cal.4th 300, 330-332 [127 Cal.Rptr.2d 482, 58 P.3d 339], I would not consider any other basis for allowing a tort cause of action.
Baxter, J., concurred.