Court Opinion

ID: 9486533
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 11:51:29.517244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:46.782524
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
On January 18, 1994, petitioner-appel-lee/eross-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc. The panel majority voted to deny rehearing, Judge Cudahy dissenting. A vote of the active members of the Court was requested on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority has voted to deny a rehearing en banc.* The petition is therefore Denied.**

 Judges Cudahy, Ripple, and Rovner voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc follows.

 Judge Flaum did not participate in the vote for rehearing en banc.