Court Opinion

ID: 9896508
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-13 13:09:31.589289+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:06.007986
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued November 7, 2023

                                      In The

                               Court of Appeals
                                      For The

                          First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                               NO. 01-23-00477-CV
                            ———————————
                            BETUL ONEY, Appellant
                                         V.
                          MUSTAFA ONEY, Appellee

                    On Appeal from the 507th District Court
                             Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 2022-02021

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Betul Oney, has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal,” stating that

“she d[oes] not want to pursue her appeal.” No other party has filed a notice appeal,

and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Further, although the

motion’s certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with
appellee, Mustafa Oney, regarding the relief requested in the motion, more than ten

days have passed, and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

      Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

                                 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

                                         2