Court Opinion

ID: 8466998
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:54:37.289389+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.169599
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Howard Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac*851cordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:95-cr-00156-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2009; entered Apr. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.