Court Opinion

ID: 8678035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 03:24:12.917276+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:26.729976
License: Public Domain

*63Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Broderick Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Gladhill, No. 8:14-cv-00026-DKC, 2015 WL 1186575 (D.Md. Mar. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.