Court Opinion

ID: 3068833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-15 23:59:31.54008+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:49:50.794187
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                           TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                   No. 10-15-00101-CV
                                   No. 10-15-00108-CV

                       IN THE INTEREST OF J.T., A CHILD
                                    AND
                      IN THE INTEREST OF M.K., A CHILD

                           From the 74th District Court
                            McLennan County, Texas
                    Trial Court No. 2013-2639-3 and 2013-154-3

                                       ORDER

         Appellants indicated in their respective docketing statements that these appeals

should be referred to mediation.

         The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative

dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-

154.073 (West 2011). The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of

this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement

of pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002 (West

2011).    Mediation is a form of ADR.      Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding
settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator.         Mediation is

private, confidential, and privileged.

        We find that these appeals are appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a)

(West 2011); 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 9.

        All the parties and the representative(s) of each child, are ordered to confer and

attempt to agree upon a mediator. Within fourteen days after the date of this Order,

appellant, William Ray Kent, is ordered to file a notice with the Clerk of this Court

which either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that the parties are unable to

agree upon a mediator. If the notice states that the parties are unable to agree upon a

mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.

        Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the above-referenced

notice agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within thirty

days after the date of the order assigning a mediator.

        No less than seven calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session,

each party and each representative of each child must provide the mediator and all

other parties with an information sheet setting forth the party’s or child’s positions

about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before the first session, all parties and

all children’s representatives must produce all information necessary for the mediator

to understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement

the information required by this Order.

In the Interest of J.T., a Child and M.K., a Child                                  Page 2
        Named parties and representatives of the children in each appeal must be

present during the entire mediation process, and each party that is not a natural person

must be represented by an employee, officer, agent, or representative with authority to

bind the party to settlement.

        Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing,

only that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by

each party. The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to

mediate without fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and

the parties must each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.

        Failure or refusal to attend the entire mediation as scheduled may result in the

imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.

        Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all

parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.

        We refer these appeals to mediation.

        These appeals are of judgments terminating parental rights and are

accelerated. Therefore, NO appellate deadlines are suspended as a result of this

Order and the appellate timetables in each appeal remain in effect during the course

of mediation.

                                                     PER CURIAM

In the Interest of J.T., a Child and M.K., a Child                                    Page 3
Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
Order issued and filed April 30, 2015

In the Interest of J.T., a Child and M.K., a Child   Page 4