Court Opinion

ID: 7194096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 17:00:16.92048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:16.198190
License: Public Domain

On Application por Rehearing.
An application for rehearing has been made by opponents and appellants, an examination of which has convinced us that the debit items of the account as recast in original opinion, need some correction; though the opponents are in error in placing “the amount of expenses and debts paid at $1,331.47 in lieu of $1,506.57, as announced in opinion.”
The item of “amount due E. Hoffpauir by community, $405, allowed in the account, as restated by the judge a quo, is in error, because all *704the claims allowed him were rejected by us; and we neglected to deduct from the community assets the amount of the paraphernal claim of deceased, which was shown to he $284.25, and this sum we failed to allow to the opponents.
Adjusting these balances and again restating the account, we have the following, viz:
Ur.
To amount cash and sale...........'.......................$2,137 10
To amount debts collected................................ 1,899 00
$4,036 10
Or.
By amount of expenses and debts paid in course of administration .............................................. 1,101 57
By amount to balance.....................................$2,934 53
Less paraphernal claim of tlie deceased..................... 284 25
Balance due community...................................$2,650 28
One half due opponents................................... 1,325 14
Also deceased’s separate claim............................. 284 25
Total due opponents..........................$1,609 3!)
And it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the opinion and decree herein previously rendered be and the same is hereby amended and corrected so as to conform to the views herein expressed, and that as thus amended and corrected, our original opinion remains undisturbed.
Rehearing refused.