Court Opinion

ID: 4686796
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-14 06:17:05.146047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:12.963494
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                                ________________

                               NO. 09-21-00071-CV
                                ________________

                           JACOB SMITH, Appellant

                                         V.

                      SAREN SMITH, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________

                On Appeal from the 128th District Court
                        Orange County, Texas
                      Trial Cause No. A200493-D
__________________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On March 31, 2021, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not

appear to have been timely filed. The appellant did not file a response.

      In his notice of appeal, appellant stated that he was appealing the trial court’s

order denying his motion for new trial, which was signed on February 25, 2021. An

order denying a motion for new trial is not independently appealable; therefore, it

does not start a new timetable for perfecting appeal. State Office of Risk Mgmt. v.

Berdan, 335 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied). “An

appeal must be taken from the final judgment, not the refusal to reconsider that

                                          1
judgment.” Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 01-19-00610-CV, 2019 WL

4677365, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 26, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.).

“[T]he time for filing a notice of appeal runs from the signing of the final judgment,

not the subsequent denial of a motion for new trial.” Id. at *2.

      The trial court signed a final judgment on November 3, 2020, and the appellate

timetables were extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. See Tex. R.

App. P. 26.1(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 1, 2021.

      Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 26, 2021, more than ninety days

from the date of judgment and outside the period for which we may grant an

extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks

jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                                     PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 12, 2021
Opinion Delivered May 13, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

                                          2