Court Opinion

ID: 903241
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-06-19 05:18:28.910517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:56.049071
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-20288       Document: 00512277912         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 18, 2013
                                     No. 12-20288
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE RAMIREZ SANCHEZ, also known as Jose Ramirez, also known as Jose
Ramirez-Sanchez, also known as Nicanor Gonzalez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-178-1

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Jose Ramirez Sanchez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ramirez Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-20288      Document: 00512277912   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/18/2013

                                 No. 12-20288

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2