Court Opinion

ID: 9324453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-12 00:13:13.11065+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:14:55.088179
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-71,535-02

                        EX PARTE CHRIS JOHN UTTON, Applicant

                    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                    CAUSE NO. 704979-B IN THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT
                                FROM HARRIS COUNTY

     Per curiam. YEARY , J. filed a concurring opinion in which SLAUGHTER , J. joined.
NEWELL, J. concurred.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty-three years’ imprisonment. The

First Court of Appeals affirmed Applicant’s conviction. Utton v. State, No. 01-99-00018-CR (Tex.

App.— Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 7, 1999). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07.

       This application was file-stamped in Harris County on March 25, 2009. An order designating

issues was signed by the trial judge on April 24, 2009. This application was not received by this

Court until September 19, 2022. There is no indication in the record of any action by the trial court
after the order designating issues was signed. Nor is there any indication as to why this application

was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or the trial court.

        Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his

conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary

review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005).Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

        As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why no action was

taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the order designating issues and the

forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant

as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and shall include that response in the

supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a response from Applicant, the trial

court shall state what efforts were made to obtain a response from Applicant.

        If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, or if the trial court is

unable to obtain a response from Applicant as to whether he wants to pursue the application, the trial

court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the

trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .

CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to

file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant

would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 7, 2022
Do not publish