Court Opinion

ID: 989950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:14:31.322018+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:42.836115
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 96-6223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

EMMANUEL IKECHUKWU ANUDU, a/k/a Cletis, a/k/a
Claytus,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CR-91-305-HAR)

Submitted:   July 23, 1996                 Decided:   July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) motion for return of property. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Anudu, No. CR-91-305-HAR (D. Md.
Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2