Court Opinion

ID: 873248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-05-30 00:01:59.780444+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:03:31.914545
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-1593          Document: 70          Page: 1       Filed: 05/29/2013

               NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

    United States Court of Appeals
        for the Federal Circuit
 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND
     NEVADA INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY
              CORPORATION,
             Plaintiffs-Appellees,

                                       v.
   RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND MARINER
         ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC,
             Defendants-Appellants.
                     __________________________

                          2012-1593, -1618
                     __________________________

     Appeals from the United States District Court for the
 District of Arizona in No. 06-CV-2182, Chief Judge Roslyn
 O. Silver.
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND
     NEVADA INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY
              CORPORATION,
             Plaintiffs- Appellants,
                                       v.
   RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND MARINER
         ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC,
             Defendants-Appellees.
Case: 12-1593    Document: 70     Page: 2    Filed: 05/29/2013

 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORP.    v. RUDOLPH                 2
 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                __________________________

                        2012-1665
                __________________________

     Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 District of Arizona in No. 06-CV-2182, Chief Judge Roslyn
 O. Silver.
                 __________________________

                      ON MOTION
                __________________________

                         ORDER

     Integrated Technology Corporation and Nevada
 Integrated Technology Corporation move without
 opposition to withdraw their cross-appeal, No. 2012-1665.

    Upon consideration thereof,

    IT IS ORDERED THAT:

    (1) The motion to withdraw 2012-1665 is granted.
 The appeal is dismissed.

    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1665.

     (3) The revised official caption for 2012-1593, -1618 is
 reflected above.

                                    FOR THE COURT

                                     /s/ Jan Horbaly
                                    Jan Horbaly
                                    Clerk
Case: 12-1593   Document: 70   Page: 3   Filed: 05/29/2013

 3               INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. RUDOLPH
                                     TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 s25

 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 2012-1665 Only):
 May 29, 2013