Court Opinion

ID: 9794191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 03:01:01.615064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:42.716537
License: Public Domain

TOWLES, Justice Pro Tem.,
specially concurring.
I concur in the conclusion of the majority that the case must be remanded for new trial due to Instruction No. 9 on OSHA regulations.
However, in considering the court’s Instruction Nos. 7 and 8 which defined a landowner’s duty to an invitee, I would caution the trial court on remand to be cognizant of the recent decision of this Court in Harrison v. Taylor, 115 Idaho 588, 768 P.2d 1321 (1989) which abolished the defense of “open and obvious hazards” to a claim for negligence by an invitee against a landowner.