Court Opinion

ID: 9829394
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:16:31.33687+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:00.704959
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
As indicated in our original opinion, the undisputed evidence established that Charles I. Francis owned the tract of land which abutted on the Brookshire-Fulcher Road, and which separated appel-lee’s 400 acre tract therefrom. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, evidence that Francis owned said tract is evidence that he owned it in fee simple. See R.C.S. Art. 1291. Appellee went further with his evidence and proved that his right of passage over the Francis tract is permissive only, and this evidence is, as stated in our original opinion, undisputed.
Motion for rehearing is refused.