Court Opinion

ID: 5982586
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 08:23:39.780985+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:49:30.924444
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed January 14, 1994.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Having pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence actually imposed, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.