Court Opinion

ID: 9556611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-17 21:01:26.119978+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:17.958064
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1502      Doc: 13         Filed: 08/16/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-1502

        JAMES ALBERT DELOACH,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of State,

                            Defendant - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01121-LMB-TCB)

        Submitted: May 30, 2023                                           Decided: August 16, 2023

        Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        James Albert Deloach, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United
        States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
        for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1502      Doc: 13         Filed: 08/16/2023      Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               James Albert Deloach appeals the district court’s orders granting summary

        judgment to Antony Blinken on Deloach’s claims of employment discrimination on the

        basis of his race, color, and gender, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

        as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and denying Deloach’s motion to alter or

        amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and

        discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Deloach v. Blinken, No. 1:21-cv-

        01121-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2022; Apr. 8, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

        because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

        court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                        AFFIRMED

                                                     2