Court Opinion

ID: 7940597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:14:27.132864+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:42.436571
License: Public Domain

Grant, J.
(concurring). There was testimony that the car was running down this hill at a speed of 30 miles an hour. I do not think the evidence conclusively shows that plaintiff was from 15 to 30 feet only from the car when he attempted to cross. If this were so, he would clearly have been guilty of contributory negligence. He had got nearly across the track, when the hind wheel of his buggy was struck. There was testimony that the car was more than 100 feet away when plaintiff started to cross. I think it was for the jury to determine the speed of the car, its distance from plaintiff when he turned to cross, and the negligence of defendant and contributory negligence of *600plaintiff. I think the case is ruled by the Garrity Case, and should be reversed.