Court Opinion

ID: 9806611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 19:17:54.616889+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:10:21.442207
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
We GRANT the motion for the appointment of new supplemental counsel. We REMAND THIS CASE IN PART to the district court solely to appoint supplemental counsel consistent with this opinion and the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3599, and to consider in the first instance whether the petitioner can establish cause for the procedural default of any ineffeetive-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims pursuant to Martinez and Trevino that he may raise, and if so, whether those claims merit relief. We retain jurisdiction in the remainder of the case and STAY proceedings *204pending the conclusion of the district court’s review.