Court Opinion

ID: 576847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:44+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:16.365894
License: Public Domain

955 F.2d 43
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Steven C. WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Harry L. ALLSBROOK, Jr., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-6693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.Decided Feb. 13, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, No. CA-91-381-HC-F, James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.
Steven C. Wilson, appellant pro se.
Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Steven C. Wilson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), for failure to exhaust state court remedies.   An involuntary dismissal upon nonjurisdictional grounds is presumed to be with prejudice.   Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).   Because dismissal with prejudice is inappropriate where the ground for dismissal is failure to exhaust remedies, we modify the district court's order to dismissal without prejudice.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that, with this exception, the appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court, as modified.   Wilson v. Allsbrook, No. CA-91-381-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.