Court Opinion

ID: 4208525
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-10-03 14:01:07.787877+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:04.004099
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10880   Date Filed: 10/03/2017   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 17-10880
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00409-VMC-JSS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

EDWIN HERNANDEZ,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (October 3, 2017)

Before HULL, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 17-10880    Date Filed: 10/03/2017   Page: 2 of 2

      Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Edwin Hernandez in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Hernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2