Court Opinion

ID: 6046081
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 14:20:51.26193+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:33.509384
License: Public Domain

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We reject plaintiffs contention that these appeals are moot because the property at issue was sold during the pendency of the appeals (see, CPLR 5523; Da Silva v Musso, 76 NY2d 436, 440-441). We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Freedman, J.). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, New York County, Freedman, J. — RPAPL.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.