Court Opinion

ID: 9832772
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:10:51.98266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:52.121113
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
We have carefully examined a vigorous motion for rehearing, in deference to which we say that our decision was intended to carry out the principles announced in Daniel v. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co., 96 Tex. 327, 72 S. W. 578, where it was said that an owner of land may recover damages for injuries to his land and his health or the enjoyment of the property. In the case at bar the jury found the use of the land had not been damaged, but did find that plaintiff has suffered personal discomfort from such odors. We have heretofore set out the evidence on this issue, from which we conclude that the same is insufficient to sustain the verdict.
The motion is overruled.