Court Opinion

ID: 3460102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 20:27:24.686736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:11.246527
License: Public Domain

Dear Mr. Boudousque':
As counsel to the Chief of Police for the City of Kenner, you have requested an Attorney General's opinion regarding a contract for legal services. You question whether it is lawful for a municipality to pay a flat rate contract fee to an attorney for legal services to be performed monthly, as long as there is no advance payment and the work is actually performed each month.
Our office advises against the use of this type of contract. That being said, a flat rate contract for legal services is not per se improper. In Attorney General Opinion No. 91-589-A, our office opined on the use of flat rate contracts as follows:
  The hourly contract certainly is the preferred practice: for the flat rate contract to be lawful and not violate Art. 7 Sec. 14 of the La. Const. 1974, payments should not be made prior to the work being performed, the work must be actually performed every month.
In order for a flat rate contract to be lawful, the municipality can only pay for legal services which are actually rendered, and may not pre-pay for future services. Therefore, in the situation described, where there is no advance payment and the work is actually performed each month, such a contract would be valid and the payments made under such contract would be constitutional.
Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain
Yours very truly,
 CHARLES C. FOTI, JR. Attorney General
  BY: _________________________________  KENNETH L. ROCHE, III Assistant Attorney General