Court Opinion

ID: 2946540
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 04:04:54.185927+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:11.214101
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                           NO. AP-76,812

                    EX PARTE BRANDON PAUL VILLAREAL, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 2009-038A IN THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM CALDWELL COUNTY

         Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

         Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four counts of

aggravated robbery and sentenced to fifty-five years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Villareal v. State, No. 03-10-00352-CR (Tex. App. – Austin, June 15,

2010).

         Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

knew that Applicant wanted to pursue discretionary review, but filed a petition for discretionary

review on Applicant’s behalf two days after the filing deadline. This Court dismissed Applicant’s
                                                                                                       2

petition for discretionary review as untimely.

        Appellate counsel filed this application on behalf of Applicant, and concedes that it was

through counsel’s oversight rather than through any fault of Applicant’s that the petition for

discretionary review was untimely filed. Based on the sworn allegations in the application, the trial

court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely file

the petition for discretionary review, and that this failure denied Applicant the opportunity to prepare

and file a timely petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

        We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Third Court of Appeals in Cause No. 03-10-00352-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 2009-038 from the 421st District Court of Caldwell

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: June 6, 2012
Do not publish