Court Opinion

ID: 677980
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:25:27+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:16.497975
License: Public Domain

35 F.3d 555
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Brandetta ROSS;  B.J. Jones;  Maryland Parole Commission;Paul A. Davis;  Clair S. Nordeck;  Queen E. Stoops;  John F.Himmel, Jr.;  William L. Smith, Warden;  Richard A. Lanham,III;  Bishop L. Robinson, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6694.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 1994.Decided August 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.  (CA-94-124-H).
William Christopher Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Brown v. Ross, No. CA-94-124-H (D. Md. June 7, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED