Court Opinion

ID: 1084879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-09 22:27:20.1682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:51.586469
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 40577

STATE OF IDAHO,                                    )        2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 690
                                                   )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                       )        Filed: October 2, 2013
                                                   )
v.                                                 )        Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                   )
FERNANDO CORTES-PONCE,                             )        THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                   )        OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                        )        BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                   )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
       County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twelve years, with five years
       determinate, for trafficking in cocaine, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                     Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
                                 and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Fernando    Cortes-Ponce    pled   guilty       to   trafficking   in   cocaine,   Idaho   Code
§§ 37-2732B(a)(2) and 18-204. The district court sentenced Cortes-Ponce to a unified term of
twelve years, with five years determinate. Cortes-Ponce appeals, contending his sentence is
excessive.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011,
1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

                                                1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Cortes-Ponce’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2