Court Opinion

ID: 8437081
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:54:51.151285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:44.211735
License: Public Domain

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Randolph seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Randolph’s motion for transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.