Court Opinion

ID: 4552624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-07-31 20:02:24.970846+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:09:04.112776
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUL 31 2020
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SELENE FINANCE, LP,                             No.    19-16277

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No.
                                                2:16-cv-02618-JAD-NJK
 v.

WESTON HILLS HOMEOWNERS'                        MEMORANDUM*
ASSOCIATION,

                Defendant,

and

SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 1168
ASPEN CLIFF,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Nevada
                   Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

                             Submitted July 14, 2020**
                             San Francisco, California

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: IKUTA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and TAGLE,*** District Judge.

      In 2008, two individuals purchased a Nevada residence with a loan secured

by a deed of trust. Bank of America acquired the deed of trust. After the homeowners

failed to pay assessments to the Weston Hills Homeowners’ Association (“HOA”),

the HOA recorded a Notice of Delinquent Assessment Lien on July 8, 2010 and

recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell against the property on July 22,

2013. Bank of America’s attorneys obtained the HOA account ledger identifying the

assessments due and tendered a cashier’s check for nine months of HOA dues. The

HOA’s attorneys accepted the tender. Bank of America later assigned the deed of

trust to Selene Finance, LP (“Selene”).

      The HOA foreclosed and a trustee’s deed upon sale to the property was

recorded for Saticoy Bay, LLC (“Saticoy Bay”). Selene brought this quiet title action

against the HOA and Saticoy Bay alleging the deed of trust still encumbered the

property. The district court entered summary judgment for Selene. We have

jurisdiction over Saticoy Bay’s appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

      1. Selene had standing to bring a quiet title action because it was assigned the

deed of trust. See Edelstein v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 286 P.3d 249, 260 (Nev. 2012).

A quiet title action is simply a judicial determination of the claimed interests in real

      ***
            The Honorable Hilda G. Tagle, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

                                           2
property. See Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 302 P.3d 1103, 1106–07

(Nev. 2013) (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.010). A deed of trust establishes the holder’s

interest in the property even if separate from the promissory note. Edelstein, 286
P.3d at 259–60; see also In re Montierth, 354 P.3d 648, 650–51 (Nev. 2015). The

holder of a deed of trust can preserve its interest by tendering the superpriority

portion of the HOA’s lien which is made up of nine months of unpaid HOA dues

and any unpaid charges for maintenance and nuisance abatement. See Bank of Am.,

N.A. v. Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Ass’n, 920 F.3d 620, 623 (9th Cir. 2019)

(per curiam).

      2. Bank of America’s tender satisfied the superpriority portion of the HOA

lien and preserved the interest in the property now held by Selene. See id. The HOA’s

ledger did not list any charges for maintenance or nuisance abatement, so the tender

of nine months of HOA dues covered the entire superpriority amount. See id.

      3. The lack of recording of the tender and Saticoy Bay’s purported bona fide

purchaser (“BFP”) status did not alter the legal effect of the tender. See Bank of Am.,

N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 427 P.3d 113, 119, 121 (Nev. 2018) (en banc). “A

party’s status as a BFP is irrelevant when a defect in the foreclosure proceeding

renders the sale void.” Id. at 121. “Tendering the superpriority portion of an HOA

lien does not create, alienate, assign, or surrender an interest in land. Rather, it

                                          3
preserves a pre-existing interest, which does not require recording.” Id. at 119. “A

foreclosure sale on a mortgage lien after valid tender satisfies that lien is void, as the

lien is no longer in default.” Id. at 121.

      AFFIRMED.

                                             4