Court Opinion

ID: 9834354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 23:30:57.830144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:14.111838
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing considerately thus calls the-court’s attention to an inadvertence in its former opinion:
“Appellant calls attention to the fact that Mrs. Agatha Horwitz is not the widow of Will Horwitz, and, in view of the fact that this appellant has no difference with the widow of Will Horwitz, but on the other hand is taking this action with her full approval, appellant would like the record to clearly show that Mrs. Agatha Hor-witz is not the widow of Will Horwitz. The confusion probably comes about by virtue of the fact that Mrs. Agatha Hor-witz was at one time the wife of Will Horwitz, but they were long since divorced.”
The correction is made as requested, since the record does clearly show that Mrs. Agatha Horwitz is not the widow of Will Horwitz.
In other respects also the motion has received careful consideration, but under the conclusion that the cause was properly decided before, it will be overruled.
Overruled.