Court Opinion

ID: 676200
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 16:01:43+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:37:47.690760
License: Public Domain

32 F.3d 563
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Sylvester M. PARHAM, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6593.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

No. 94-6593.
Submitted:  June 23, 1994.Decided:  July 28, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.  (CR-90-120, CA-94-338)
Sylvester M. Parham, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Wiley Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Parham, Nos.  CR-90-120;  CA-94-338 (E.D. Va.  May 20, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED