Court Opinion

ID: 9570879
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 20:27:16.156519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:06.223954
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam
(on motion for rehearing). In our original opinion, in referring to Hansen v. Schmidman Properties (1962), 16 Wis. (2d) 639, 115 N. W. (2d) 495, we erroneously used the word “alley” in describing the place where the plaintiff fell. The correct expression should have been “driveway apron,” and we now correct such mistake. In no way does the use of the erroneous term affect the merits of the matter upon which rehearing is now sought.
The motion for rehearing is denied, without costs.