Court Opinion

ID: 7437245
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:00:52.893506+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:32.987084
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The record before us does not indicate whether the reception of Littles’ plea of guilty complied with the standards of Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, followed by this court in Rudolph v. State, 1970, 230 So.2d 14. Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.