Court Opinion

ID: 2964178
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:21:45.062316+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:55.043894
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          June 24, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 96-1029

                                   RICHARD DIONNE,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                    COMMISSIONER, NH DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________
         
                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                 [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
                                                 ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Selya, Boudin, and Stahl
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Richard Dionne on brief pro se.
            ______________
            Jeffrey R. Howard, Attorney General, and Stephen J. Judge,  Senior
            _________________                        ________________
        Assistant Attorney General.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  Richard Dionne, who is incarcerated at
                      __________

            the New Hampshire State Prison, appeals from the dismissal of

            his  civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C.   1983 against various

            state  prison officials.    We affirm  substantially for  the

            reasons given in the district court's decision dated November

            8, 1995, finding no merit in Dionne's claims of error.

                      Affirmed.
                      ________

                                         -2-