Court Opinion

ID: 2919420
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 00:43:09.307632+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:08:32.354304
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-00-770-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
__________________________________________________________________

JUAN RAMIRO TOVAR,       Appellant,

v.

IRMA TOVAR,         Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N
Before Justices Dorsey, Yañez, and Rodriguez
Opinion by Justice Yañez
 
Appellant, Juan Ramiro Tovar, and appellee, Irma Tovar, were granted a divorce by a decree dated July 26, 2000. 
Appellant now argues that the trial court's division of the community property was inequitable.  We affirm.
In his second issue on appeal, appellant challenges the trial court's division of his retirement fund.  The trial court ordered
that the retirement plan be divided in two equal shares, with the debts against the plan also being divided in two equal
shares. Because the administrator of the retirement plan withdraws payments on the debt directly from appellant's account,
the trial court ordered appellee to pay her share of the debt directly to appellant.  Appellant argues that this is, in effect, a
disproportionate division of the estate, because he does not believe that appellee will pay her share of the debt.
Appellant challenged neither the division of the retirement fund nor the division of the debt against that fund, and appellant
himself suggested that the trial court order that appellee pay her half of the debt directly to appellant.  As a prerequisite to
presenting a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that the complaint was raised to the trial court by a
timely request, objection, or motion.  Tex. R. App. P. 33.1.  Appellant may not raise to this Court a complaint that was not
raised before the trial court; therefore, we dismiss his second issue on appeal.
Because this issue is dispositive, we do not address appellant's first issue. (1) Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.  The judgment of the trial
court is AFFIRMED.

 
LINDA REYNA YAÑEZ
Justice

Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this, the 6th day of December, 2001.
1. In his first issue, appellant argued that this Court should disregard the trial court's conclusion of law that, in the event that
the division of the community property is found to be disproportionate, the record would support the awarding of a
disproportionate share of the community property to the appellee.