Court Opinion

ID: 8442734
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:26:30.572185+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:51.023231
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
George Patton Nelson, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Nelson’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal, and we affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated by the district court. Nelson v. Robinson, No. 3:08-cv-00603-HEH, 2011 WL 2358542 (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.