Court Opinion

ID: 7153748
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:04:19.770046+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:11.523319
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
Judge Peters:
In the petition, no description is given of the land sought to be subjected to the payment of the debt except that it is situated in Pulaski County; not even the quantity is alleged. Reference is made to a deed which appellee made to appellant with a promise to file it; but it never was filed as an exhibit; and'there is noi statement in 'the petition by which it could be identified. A deed was lodged with the clerk, but it constituted no part of the pleading.
The petition should set forth the land sought to be sold; and the judgment pursuing the description given in the petition should en- ' able the commissioner to identify, the land he was ordered to .sell without looking to any other paper. In so important a matter as *389the sale of real estate nothing should be left to conjecture, or to the discretion of a ministerial officer.

Morrow, for appellants.

James, for appellee.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith. If appellee should in proper time ask to amend his petition, he should be permitted to do so.