Court Opinion

ID: 822610
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-02-28 07:51:57.624999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:23.078116
License: Public Domain

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

                          SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               FILED
                                                                              February 1, 2013

                                                                           RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

LEATHIE TOWNLEY, WIDOW OF THOMAS                                         SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

                                                                             OF WEST VIRGINIA
TOWNLEY, Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.)   No. 11-0541	 (BOR Appeal No. 2045041)
                   (Claim No. 880041248)

WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Below, Respondent

and

WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS,
Employer Below, Respondent

                             MEMORANDUM DECISION
      Petitioner Leathie Townley, by Wendle D. Cook, her attorney, appeals the decision of the
West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. The West Virginia Office of Insurance
Commissioner, by Mary Rich Maloy, its attorney, and the West Virginia Division of Highways,
by Xueyan Z. Palmer, its attorney, each filed timely responses.

        This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated February 24, 2011, in
which the Board affirmed an August 20, 2010, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s denial of
dependent’s benefits based on the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s recommendations. The
Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the
petition, and the case is mature for consideration.

        Having considered the petition and the relevant decision of the lower tribunal, the Court
is of the opinion that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument.
Upon consideration of the standard of review, the Court determines that there is no prejudicial
error. This case does not present a new or significant question of law. For these reasons, a
memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

                                               1
        Mrs. Townley’s husband, Thomas Townley, died on August 22, 2007. In 1988 Mr.
Townley was awarded a permanent total disability award based on findings by the Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board (“OPB”). In the years leading up to his death, Mr. Townley was treated
for respiratory problems at Boone Memorial Hospital, where he was x-rayed and primarily
diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”). At one visit in October of
2004, Mr. Townley’s treating physician, Dr. Ron D. Stollings, diagnosed COPD exacerbation,
acute purulent bronchitis, history of black lung, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Three weeks before his death, Mr. Townley was treated at Charleston Area Medical Center, but
no treatment records from that visit other than x-rays were provided by the claimant.

        Dr. Stollings and Dr. Gregory J. Fino came to opposite conclusions as to whether
occupational pneumoconiosis was a material contributing factor in Mr. Townley’s death. Dr.
Stollings reported that Mr. Townley had “chronic atrial fibrillation [and] COPD with respiratory
failure. . . . Mr. Townley also had significant . . . occupational pneumoconiosis.” Dr. Stollings
further stated that “[i]t is difficult to say which one had the most effect but certainly occupational
pneumoconiosis had a significant role, not only in his death but in his disability prior to his
death. . . .” Dr. Fino inspected the report of Dr. Stollings, the OPB reports, the death certificate,
and Mr. Townley’s medical records. Dr. Fino found that Mr. Townley had smoked for 16 years
before quitting in 1988 and that he had died of COPD. Dr. Fino specifically found that
occupational pneumoconiosis was not a material contributing factor in Mr. Townley’s death.

        Each of the three doctors of the OPB, Dr. Jack Kinder, Dr. Thomas M. Hayes, and Dr.
Brad Henry, examined Mr. Townley’s medical records to assess the cause of death. The OPB
stated that the medical records were extremely limited. Each of the OPB doctors found that, not
only was occupational pneumoconiosis not a material factor in Mr. Townley’s death, but that the
evidence did not show that he ever had it. Each doctor further found that Mr. Townley’s
symptoms support COPD having caused his death.

        On appeal, Mrs. Townley’s argument for being awarded dependent’s benefits is that it
was not proven that her husband was a smoker, and since he had been awarded a permanent total
disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis, occupational pneumoconiosis must have been
a material factor in his death. The Division of Highways responds that OPB properly found that
occupational pneumoconiosis did not play a material role in the death of Mr. Townley, and that
the Office of Judges and Board of Review were correct in affirming the OPB’s findings. The
Office of Insurance Commissioner responds that Mrs. Townley did not meet the burden of
showing that OPB was clearly wrong, nor that the Office of Judges and Board of Review were
clearly wrong to rely on the OPB’s and Dr. Fino’s findings rather than Dr. Townley’s findings.
We agree with the Office of the Insurance Commissioner: Mrs. Townley has not shown that the
Board of Review was clearly wrong in its findings of fact and conclusions of law.

        For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
                                                  2
                                       Affirmed.

ISSUED: February 1, 2013

CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Brent D. Benjamin

Justice Robin J. Davis

Justice Margaret L. Workman

Justice Allen H. Loughry II

DISSENTING:

Justice Menis E. Ketchum

                                   3