Court Opinion

ID: 4678227
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-17 00:00:42.102488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:01:52.370116
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40618      Document: 00515825411         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/16/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                            United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit

                                                                           FILED
                                                                       April 16, 2021
                                  No. 20-40618
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                         Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Patrick Renoid Smith,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:18-CR-131-10

   Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Patrick Renoid Smith has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40618    Document: 00515825411         Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/16/2021

                                 No. 20-40618

   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.

                                      2