Court Opinion

ID: 9501824
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 19:46:01.646573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:49.477901
License: Public Domain

HARTZ, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result and join all of Chief Judge Briscoe’s opinion except Section 11(C). To reject Farr’s challenge to the indictment, no analysis is required beyond what is in the final paragraph of Section 11(C): “When a defendant’s conduct violates more than one criminal statute, the government may prosecute under either.” United States v. Bradshaw, 580 F.3d 1129, 1136 (10th Cir.2009). Because Farr was properly charged and convicted *1289of a violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201, it is unnecessary to discuss the meaning of § 7202.