Court Opinion

ID: 23129
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 08:06:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:54.113298
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                   No. 99-41405
                                 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                        versus

TIMOTHY WAYNE RICHEY,
                                                                Defendant-Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Eastern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:99-CR-59

                                  February 5, 2001

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

       Timothy Wayne Richey appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to a single

count of receiving a sexually explicit depiction of a minor. He contends that the

   *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
district court erred in assessing a four-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)

because the four images offered by the Government to support the increase, which

depicted anal penetration of very young minors by adult males, did not portray

sadistic or masochistic conduct or other depictions of violence. This argument is

foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Lyckman,1

         Richey also contends that there was no evidence establishing his intent to

possess pictures portraying sadistic or masochistic conduct or other depictions of

violence. That contention also is meritless in light of unrebutted statements in the

PSR reflecting that Richey had downloaded several images of minors engaged in

sexually explicit conduct, including the four images offered by the Government at

sentencing, from an Internet news group.2

         The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.

   1
       ___ F. 3d ___ (5th Cir. Dec. 7, 2000, No. 99-40982), 2000 WL 1800131 at *2-*4.
   2
   United States v. Kimbrough, 69 F.3d 723, 734 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v.
Mir, 919 F.2d 940, 943 (5th Cir. 1990).
                                           2