Court Opinion

ID: 2690878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 20:54:04.921891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:26.693155
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 131 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2012-Ohio-1140.]

                         DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KARRIS.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 131 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2012-Ohio-1140.]
     (No. 2010-1898—Submitted March 15, 2012—Decided March 19, 2012.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Tom John Karris, Attorney
Registration No. 0033659, last known business address in Strongsville, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 1, 2011,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of
publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 129 Ohio St.3d
499, 2011-Ohio-4243, 954 N.E.2d 118.
        O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
                               ______________________