Court Opinion

ID: 9913034
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-26 18:00:55.744272+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:06:52.368422
License: Public Domain

Appellate Case: 23-3234     Document: 010110973956       Date Filed: 12/26/2023    Page: 1
                                                                                  FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         Tenth Circuit

                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                        December 26, 2023
                          _________________________________
                                                                          Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                              Clerk of Court
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-3234
                                                   (D.C. No. 2:22-CM-80600-DDC-1)
  NYLES EARLMONDO JOHNSON,                                      (D. Kan.)

        Defendant - Appellant.

  –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

        Plaintiff - Appellee,

  v.                                                          No. 23-3235
                                                   (D.C. No. 2:20-CR-20064-DDC-1)
  NYLES EARLMONDO JOHNSON,                                     (D. Kan.)

        Defendant - Appellant.
                       _________________________________

                              ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
                          _________________________________

 Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. **
                   _________________________________

       *
          This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
 of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
 its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
        **
           Because this matter is being decided on a Joint Motion to Vacate and
 Remand, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not
 materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f);
 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellate Case: 23-3234    Document: 010110973956         Date Filed: 12/26/2023    Page: 2

       These procedurally-consolidated appeals are before the court on the parties’

 Joint Motion to Vacate and Remand. The motion asks the court to vacate the sentence

 and remand this matter to the district court for resentencing.

       Upon consideration and review of the record, the court grants the motion. The

 sentence is vacated. This matter is remanded to the district court. The district court

 shall undertake, in its discretion, all necessary and appropriate proceedings to

 resentence defendant-appellant Nyles Earlmondo Johnson in accord with the Joint

 Motion to Vacate and Remand filed in this court. The Clerk is directed to issue the

 mandate forthwith.

                                             Entered for the Court

                                             Per Curiam

                                            2