Court Opinion

ID: 6772841
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:46:01.979682+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:45.765632
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

FNS did not file a cross-appeal with respect to the lower court’s denial of reimbursement for expenditures made after FNS’s January 1, 1990 opt-out. Only one question is, therefore, presented: Was the court of appeals correct in finding FNS eligible for reimbursement of expenditures made prior to opt-out even though the applications for reimbursement were not made until after FNS had left the handicap program? For the reasons to follow, we agree with the decision of the court of appeals.
The commission’s denial of reimbursement is premised on State ex rel. First Natl. Supermarkets, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 582, 639 N.E.2d 1185. That decision, however, involved the employer’s request for reimbursement for expenditures arising after opt-out. In this case, FNS seeks reimbursement for outlays made before opt-out — when the employer was still actively participating in the handicap reimbursement program. Accordingly, the earlier decision does not control and does not bar reimbursement for FNS’s preopt-out expenses.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.