Court Opinion

ID: 9556198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-16 16:05:51.144154+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:41:27.788915
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    BRIAN L. COVERDALE,                      §
                                             § No. 156, 2023
          Defendant Below,                   §
          Appellant,                         § Court Below–Superior Court
                                             § of the State of Delaware
          v.                                 §
                                             § Cr. ID Nos. 2006004121 (N)
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                       §              2003011608 (N)
                                             §
          Appellee.                          §

                                Submitted: June 29, 2023
                                Decided:   August 15, 2023

Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.

                                          ORDER

         After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to

affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the Superior Court’s judgment

should be affirmed. On July 15, 2021, the appellant, Brian Coverdale, pleaded guilty

to manslaughter, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, driving

under the influence of drugs, and speeding. On October 29, 2021, the Superior Court

sentenced Coverdale to an aggregate of twelve years of incarceration followed by

decreasing levels of supervision. Coverdale did not appeal his convictions or

sentence and, accordingly, his convictions became final thirty days thereafter.1 On

March 24, 2023—more than one year and three months after his convictions became

1
    Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(m)(1).
final—Coverdale filed his first motion for postconviction relief, raising claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel. The Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by

denying Coverdale’s motion for postconviction relief: the motion was procedurally

barred as untimely filed2 and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior

Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(5).

       NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm be

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.

                                                     BY THE COURT:

                                                     /s/ Gary F. Traynor
                                                     Justice

2
 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(1) (providing in part that “[a] motion for postconviction relief may
not be filed more than one year after the judgment of conviction is final”).

                                                 2