Court Opinion

ID: 9365343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-23 20:00:32.630639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:45.036763
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-11517    Document: 26-1     Date Filed: 01/23/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-11517
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       THOMAS JAMES HARRIS,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00151-RBD-DCI-1
                           ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11517      Document: 26-1     Date Filed: 01/23/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-11517

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               Meghan Collins, appointed counsel for Thomas James Har-
       ris in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur-
       ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convictions and
       sentences are AFFIRMED.