Court Opinion

ID: 4314614
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-21 22:23:00.546339+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:33:52.382674
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                            ____________________
                               NO. 09-18-00359-CV
                            ____________________

                     OXBOW CALCINING LLC, Appellant

                                          V.

               PORT ARTHUR STEAM ENERGY, LP, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________

                    On Appeal from the 172nd District Court
                           Jefferson County, Texas
                          Trial Cause No. E-201,894
________________________________________________________________________

                                       ORDER

      The appellant, Oxbow Calcining LLC (Oxbow), filed a motion to stay all trial

court proceedings and discovery during the pendency of their appeal from an order

denying a motion to compel arbitration and from an order granting post-judgment

turnover relief. Appellee, Port Arthur Steam Energy, LP (PASE), filed a response.

Both parties filed several replies and sur-replies.

                                           1
          When an appeal is perfected, we may make such orders as are necessary to

preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2,

24.4(c), and 29.3.

          We grant a temporary stay and STAY the enforcement of the Turnover Order

and discovery in Cause Number E-201,894, until further order of this Court. We

further ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing and make appropriate orders

pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 24 and 24.2. Any documents filed, orders signed, and

the transcript of a Rule 24 hearing held by the trial court shall be forwarded to this

Court as a supplemental record no later than Friday, October 19, 2018.

          We do not abate the appeal at this time and all appellate deadlines remain in

effect.

          ORDER ENTERED September 20, 2018.

                                                                  PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

                                            2