Court Opinion

ID: 693775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:21:04+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:59.438096
License: Public Domain

52 F.3d 321NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward GRANT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.STATE of South Carolina;  T. Travis Medlock, AttorneyGeneral of the State of South Carolina,Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-7062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  March 21, 1995.Decided:  April 26, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.  Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge.  (CA-93-3311)
Edward Grant, Appellant Pro Se.  Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Edward Grant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Grant v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-3311 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 1994).  We also deny Grant's motions requesting appointment of counsel and oral argument.  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.