Court Opinion

ID: 991459
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:36:53.457758+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:20:28.454741
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7243

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

PATRICIA RAE FRUETEL, a/k/a Joe, a/k/a The
Expert,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District
Judge. (CR-91-70-N, CA-95-983-N)

Submitted:   January 23, 1997             Decided:   February 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-
rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fruetel, Nos.
CR-91-70-N; CA-95-983-N (E.D. Va. July 22, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                  2