Court Opinion

ID: 7151922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:01:20.251765+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:09.341719
License: Public Domain

Opinion of the Court by
Judge Robertson:
Randle & Tyler, for appellant.
The legal effect of the sheriff’s bond is to guarantee his faithful performance of every official duty. When he attached the horse the law requires him to keep it subject to the order and disposition of the court; and consequently his illegal conversion of it to his own use and leaving the state without accounting for it was a breach of his bond. The petition sufficiently charges that breach, and is, therefore, substantially good.
The cause of action did not, however, accrue, as complete and maintainable, until after the attaching creditor had obtained his judgment in the attachment case. And therefore as that judgment was rendered within seven years preceding the institution of this action against the sureties in the bond, the statute of limitations does not discharge them from this liability.
Wherefore, "perceiving no error in the judgment against these appellants, the judgment is affirmed.