Court Opinion

ID: 3661789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:13:05.275006+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:37.466457
License: Public Domain

It appears from the record that the only question was, which party should pay the costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. S.v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93.
Appeal dismissed.
Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, post, 184; Monroe v. Angel, post, 847; Elliottv. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438; Van Dyke v. Ins.Co., 174 N.C. 81.