Court Opinion

ID: 1000001
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:33:44.513627+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:14.172253
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 99-6827

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JACQUE ALSUP,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
96-192-S, CA-99-67-S)

Submitted:   October 7, 1999                 Decided:   October 14, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Atlanta,
Georgia, for Appellant. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jacque Alsup seeks to appeal the district court’s orders de-

nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999),

and denying his motion for reconsideration.    We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.      See

United States v. Alsup, Nos. CR-96-102-S; CA-99-67-S (D. Md. May 17

& June 4, 1999).*   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

     *
       Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
May 14, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered
on the docket sheet on May 17, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and
79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that
the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the
effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

                                  2