Court Opinion

ID: 9489735
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 13:22:45.4372+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:53:41.213325
License: Public Domain

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge,
dissenting and concurring.
I concur in all of the court’s opinion except the disposition of the issue that involves Bailey v. United States, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). The court’s disposition of that issue is contrary to United States v. McKinney, 79 F.3d 105 (8th Cir.1996), in which we held, under circumstances identical in all material respects to those present in this case, that we would not consider the defendant’s Bailey argument because he had not presented it to the district court and had therefore forfeited it. I therefore respectfully dissent from the portion of the court’s judgment that remands the case to the district court for reconsideration in the light of Bailey.