Court Opinion

ID: 1005857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:02:34.848396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:42.333177
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6760

ROGER LEE ROWE,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

HOWARD PAINTER, Warden,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (CA-00-359-3)

Submitted:   September 28, 2001        Decided:     November 15, 2001

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Lee Rowe, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Allen Hayes
Loughry, II, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Roger Lee Rowe seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. Rowe v. Painter, No. CA-00-359-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 27,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2