Court Opinion

ID: 8681045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:09:07.910069+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.398886
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Deroderick Cordell Mack has *732moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mack has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Mack’s motion for leave to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *732published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.