Court Opinion

ID: 9655972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 19:28:56.249797+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:25.340955
License: Public Domain

FARMER, J.
In this dissolution of marriage action, where the marital assets exceed $26 million, we affirm on all issues except as to the amount of an equalization payment prescribed in the final judgment.
While the action was pending, each party received advances against equitable distribution: he, $1,705,504; she, $1,603,610. The parties agree that there is an error in factoring the advances into the final distribution because the total marital assets were fully accounted for in the distribution — that she should not also have been given a credit for the difference in the amounts of the advances. They disagree as to the solution. He argues that the credit should simply be eliminated. She argues that the advances should be taken out of the calculation.
Because the advances were in all events part of the marital estate, the court correctly accounted for them in the equalization process. We agree with him that the credit of $101,894 should be eliminated. On remand, the court shall reduce the equalization payment from $1,450,006 to $1,348,112.
In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.
WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for rehearing is denied.
*192FARMER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.