Court Opinion

ID: 33002
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 18:59:59+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:43.609552
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 22, 2003

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 03-30370
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK ANTHONY VINZANT,
also known as Mark Vinzant,
                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                       USDC No. 02-CR-168-1
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender representing Mark Anthony

Vinzant has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).      Vinzant

was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed

a response.

     Vinzant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appeal rights

except with respect to any sentence imposed in excess of the

statutory maximum or any upward departure from the applicable

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-30370
                               -2-

sentencing guidelines range as determined by the district court.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.