Court Opinion

ID: 4350247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-13 17:01:06.661232+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:31.692110
License: Public Domain

People v Santana (2018 NY Slip Op 08555)

People v Santana

2018 NY Slip Op 08555

Decided on December 13, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 13, 2018

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

7878 1143/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vChristopher Santana, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered June 21, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 13, 2018
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.