Court Opinion

ID: 4377031
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-14 16:00:34.753639+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:40.413889
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-13432   Date Filed: 03/14/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 18-13432
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00026-PGB-DCI-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

WILLIAM JOSEPH MCCLENATHAN,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.
                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (March 14, 2019)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-13432    Date Filed: 03/14/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for William McClenathan in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and McClenathan’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                         2