Court Opinion

ID: 802740
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-20 19:14:01+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:05.254416
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Dana J. Claiborne appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Claiborne,
  
  No. 3:06-cr-00240-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.