Court Opinion

ID: 6429110
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-25 12:06:35.685931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:52:07.102887
License: Public Domain

Hammond, J.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries resulting in the death of one Bianco, the plaintiff’s intestate. At the trial it appeared that at about half past five o’clock *359in the afternoon of January 2, 1904, Bianco, while at work shovelling snow in the large freight yard of the defendant at New Haven in the State of Connecticut, was struck by a locomotive engine and mortally hurt. Snow had been falling all that day, and at the time of the accident was still falling. The wind was blowing and it was dark. The evidence tended to show that Bianco had performed similar work there the preceding winter, but it does not appear that he had worked during the winter in question before the day of the accident. On this day he began about ten o’clock in the morning and worked up to the time of the accident.
We see no negligence on the part of the defendant. The plaintiff knew that he was at work in a railroad yard where trains and engines are frequently passing. There was no undertaking upon the part of the defendant to give him warning, but he was expected to look out for himself. If the engineer failed to sound the whistle or ring the bell, it was not negligence for which the defendant was responsible. Both by the common law, and by the law of the State of Connecticut as we understand it to be under the decisions of that State which were put in the case as evidence, there is no evidence of negligence of the defendant. Morris v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 184 Mass. 368. Whittlesey v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 77 Conn. 100, and cases cited.
It becomes unnecessary to consider the other grounds of the defence.

Exceptions overruled.