Court Opinion

ID: 4519443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-03-25 20:08:42.640931+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:53:56.663879
License: Public Domain

Sudit v Ezagui (2020 NY Slip Op 02087)

Sudit v Ezagui

2020 NY Slip Op 02087

Decided on March 25, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 25, 2020
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2016-12910
 (Index No. 24782/05)

[*1]Vladimir Sudit, etc., appellant, 
vJoseph Ezagui, et al., defendants, Ameriquest Mortgage Company, respondent.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
Butler, Fitzgerald, Fiveson & McCarthy, A Professional Corporation, New York, NY (David K. Fiveson of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mark I. Partnow, J.), dated September 21, 2016. The order granted the motion of the defendant Ameriquest Mortgage Company for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
For the reasons stated in Sudit v Eliav ( ___ AD3d ___ [decided herewith]), the order is affirmed.
AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court