Court Opinion

ID: 5093261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 16:17:21.049329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:20:42.217271
License: Public Domain

ORDER

PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury of one count of driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of five years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant does not address any points in his appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. See State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b)