Court Opinion

ID: 4313632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-19 19:26:16.843282+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:04:36.870743
License: Public Domain

People v James (2018 NY Slip Op 06113)

People v James

2018 NY Slip Op 06113

Decided on September 19, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 19, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-05554
 (Ind. No. 1881/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vOdell A. James, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel; Eleanor Reilly on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Barry Kron, J.), imposed April 13, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Vinson, 161 AD3d 1109; People v Rosa-Cruz, 159 AD3d 837) because the record of the colloquy does not demonstrate that the defendant understood the distinction between the rights automatically waived by a plea of guilty and the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257). In addition, there is no indication in the record as to whether the defendant read and understood the written waiver or discussed the written waiver with counsel (see People v Johnson, 157 AD3d 964). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 257). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court