Court Opinion

ID: 9402836
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-17 10:09:46.433818+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:02.881968
License: Public Domain

NO. 12-23-00126-CV

                          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

               TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

                                     TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE                      §         APPEAL FROM THE 115TH
OF   DONNIE    M.  RUSHING,
DECEASED                                         §         DISTRICT COURT

                                                 §         UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                      PER CURIAM

       This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
       A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--
at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas
Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may
enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an
appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement
of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
       On May 16, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Jodi Velin, that the filing
fee in this appeal is due and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid
on or before May 26. The date for remitting the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid the
fee or otherwise shown that she is excused from paying the fee.
         Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).1

Opinion delivered June 14, 2023.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

         1 We also note that Appellant has not filed the required docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. Nor

does Appellant’s notice of appeal comply with appellate Rule 9.5 or Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice
and Remedies Code. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a)
(West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s
record).

                                                          2
                                  COURT OF APPEALS

      TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                           JUDGMENT

                                             JUNE 14, 2023

                                         NO. 12-23-00126-CV

     IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DONNIE M. RUSHING, DECEASED

                                Appeal from the 115th District Court
                            of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 209-22)

       THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

       It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.

                    By per curiam opinion.
                    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J