Court Opinion

ID: 7709116
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 19:08:36.834605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:00.692024
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the plea colloquy and sentencing order, we conclude that the plea agreement was for a sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, including the mandatory minimum sentences associated therewith. See § 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Brister v. State, 622 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). That being so, the mandatory minimum sentences were within the legal authority of the court to impose. The order denying motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.