Court Opinion

ID: 8123424
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 15:02:58.49788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:06.829134
License: Public Domain

McCrary, J.,
(orally.) It is a rule of the bankrupt law, under which the affairs of this company were settled, that all the claims against the estate shall be presented within two years after proceedings begun. To expedite the settlement of the affairs of the insolvent concern is as much an object of the law as fairness and equality. In view of this rule, I think that in waiting four years and a half before presenting his claim the petitioner was guilty of such laches as will act as a fatal bar to his claim. That by relying upon the correctness of Judge Dillon’s opinion petitioner is able to present sufficient cause to excuse his negligence, I cannot admit. It is unfortunate oftentimes that parties are led into error by a mistaken notion of the law; but yet, for its own preservation, it is presumed that every individual is cognizant of the law; and a mistake from this cause can be no valid foundation for a claim, nor can it act as an excuse for what is clearly laches. Again, to open the affairs of the company by allowingthis claim, would entail an almost unlimited number of lawsuits, for each apparently-satisfied creditor would return for the interest upon his claim. The sum of the interest, which has been increasing for seven years and a half, would now amount to an enormous figure, and would become a grievous burden upon the stockholders, which would not have been the ease if the creditors, by exercising proper vigilance and diligence, had claimed the interest at the time that they did the principal, for then the difference would have been but slight. In view of these considerations I must affirm the judgment of the district court.