Court Opinion

ID: 4283597
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-12 15:43:18.642354+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:26:05.252423
License: Public Domain

People v Chodakowski (2018 NY Slip Op 04280)

People v Chodakowski

2018 NY Slip Op 04280

Decided on June 12, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 12, 2018

Richter, J.P., Webber, Kahn, Kern, Oing, JJ.

6836 2930/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vSzymon Chodakowski, Defendant-Appellant.

Brafman & Associates, P.C., New York (Mark M. Baker of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered November 29, 2016, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
The People met their burden of establishing defendant's guilt of first-degree rape and first-degree sexual abuse by proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant subjected the victim to sexual intercourse while she was unable to consent due to being physically helpless, since she was asleep when the intercourse started. Although it is undisputed that defendant had been drinking heavily that night, defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence (Penal Law § 25.00[2]) that he did not know that the victim was asleep while having had sexual intercourse with her (Penal Law § 130.10[1]).
Defendant's CPL 330.30(2) claims are unpreserved based upon his failure to file the appropriate motion in Supreme Court for the relief he seeks here. In fact, prior to sentencing, defense counsel never specifically requested a new trial or hearing on the grounds now raised on appeal.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JUNE 12, 2018
CLERK