Court Opinion

ID: 3507647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:18:02.039023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:59.043770
License: Public Domain

1 Reported in 37 N.W.2d 711.
On March 14, 1949, defendant filed with this court a motion for an order vacating and setting aside the judgment for costs entered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $550.25 and requiring plaintiff to pay to defendant all necessary expenses and a reasonable attorneys' fee upon the appeal. The remittitur in the above action (Kasal v. Kasal, 227 Minn, 529,35 N.W. [2d] 745) was regularly sent down to the trial court on February 15, 1949.
This court is now without authority to recall the remittitur and is without *Page 571 
jurisdiction to vacate its judgment herein. The established rule is that "after an appellate court has pronounced its judgment or decree in a cause, and has remitted it to the courtbelow for enforcement, and such remittitur has been filed inthe lower court, the jurisdiction of the appellate court is completely divested, and * * * it has no authority to recall the remittitur, unless there has been some irregularity or error in issuing it; as where it was issued contrary to the rules of the court, or where, by reason of a clerical mistake, it does not correctly express the judgment of this court." (Italics supplied.) Rud v. Board of Co. Commrs. 66 Minn. 358,360, 68 N.W. 1062, 69 N.W. 886. See, Farmers  M. State Bank v. Mellum, 174 Minn. 605, 219 N.W. 179; State, by Benson, v. Erickson, 188 Minn. 633, 247 N.W. 687; State v. Waddell,191 Minn. 475, 254 N.W. 627; 16 Minn. L.Rev. 700; 1 Dunnell, Dig. Supp. § 453.
Motion denied.