Court Opinion

ID: 9529421
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:50:40.709419+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:46.780959
License: Public Domain

Petition for Rehearing
Carson, C. J.
— The court has examined the appellant’s petition for rehearing in the above-captioned cause.
Nothing additional has been presented in this petition above what was presented by the appellant’s brief and argument in the original presentation of the cause. The appellant does, however, charge the court with failure to dispose of certain specifications of error contained in his motion for a new trial. We point out at this stage of the proceedings that our failure to comment on a given specification does not mean that that specification was not considered. The specifications 6 through 15 all presented the same general related propositions of law. By our disposition of specifications 13 through 15 we were in effect disposing of the other specifications 6 through 12. However, to answer the appellant’s petition for rehearing, we point *301out that we have considered those specifications and in our opinion they do not present reversible error.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Cooper, Faulconer, Prime, JJ., concur.
Note. — Reported in 230 N. E. 2d 336; Rehearing Opinion reported in 231 N. E. 2d 284.