Court Opinion

ID: 994374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:22:07.016356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.800460
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7765

ANDREW PAUL PARKER,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION;      ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
97-779-CCB)

Submitted:   February 24, 1998            Decided:   March 12, 1998

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Paul Parker, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. Parker v. Maryland Div. of Correction,
No. CA-97-779-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2