Court Opinion

ID: 7767184
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:46:53.848011+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:52.179018
License: Public Domain

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
In accordance with the June 2, 2003, opinion and order of the United States Supreme Court,1 we vacate the judgment of this Court, which reversed the trial court's order granting the motion of The Citizens Bank ("the Bank") to compel Alafabco, Inc., to arbitrate its dispute with the Bank and its employees. Alafabco, Inc. v. Citizens Bank, [Ms. 1010703, August 30, 2002] 872 So.2d 798 (Ala. 2002). The Supreme Court held that the transaction at issue had a nexus with interstate commerce sufficient to invoke the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Therefore, finding no merit in any other arguments against the arbitrability of the claims asserted against the Bank and its employees by Alafabco, we affirm the trial court's order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration.
AFFIRMED. *Page 810 
HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur.
1 Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 123 S.Ct. 2037
(2003).