Court Opinion

ID: 9624925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 07:21:45.268434+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:06:00.783469
License: Public Domain

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION REHEARING DENIED
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
Appellee in a motion for rehearing challenges this court’s refusal to award attorney’s fees on appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-341.01, asserting that approximately 20 per cent of his briefs was devoted exclusively to defense of his contract theory and an award may reasonably be computed on that basis. The contract and negligence theories overlap, however, to a degree where we do not believe such a quantitative approach is applicable.
Motions of both parties for rehearing are denied.
HOWARD and HATHAWAY, JJ., concur.