Court Opinion

ID: 4396609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-14 19:00:17.766939+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:52:10.847631
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 19-1013

In re: WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.,

                    Petitioner.

                 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:16-ct-03269-FL)

Submitted: April 30, 2019                                         Decided: May 14, 2019

Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Carawan, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      William Carawan, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order requiring

a prison official to pay his filing fee. We conclude that Carawan is not entitled to

mandamus relief.

      Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, LLC,

907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.

In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

      The relief sought by Carawan is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                    PETITION DENIED

                                           2