Court Opinion

ID: 6349337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-06-13 20:00:37.872902+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:27.900224
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-13722      Date Filed: 06/13/2022   Page: 1 of 2

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-13722
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIKEL WAYNE NUNNALLY,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Middle District of Florida
           D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00007-PGB-GJK-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-13722         Date Filed: 06/13/2022    Page: 2 of 2

2                      Opinion of the Court                 21-13722

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
        Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Mikel Nunnally in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Nunnally’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.