Court Opinion

ID: 5159379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 02:32:49.807387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:25:33.528944
License: Public Domain

RABINOWITZ, Justice,
dissenting.
I would grant Ackermann’s Petition for Hearing for the reasons expressed in my dissent in State v. Glass, 596 P.2d 10 (Alaska 1979), and the more recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in U.S. v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537, 102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982).1

. Further, I am in agreement with the views expressed by Justice Compton in his dissent in this case.