Court Opinion

ID: 9545487
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 17:13:20.415772+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:14:52.993582
License: Public Domain

HARGRAVE, Justice,
concurring specially:
I concur in the conclusion that the U. S. Government is an indispensable party in this instance. However, insofar as this opinion constitutes a reaffirmance of the law of accretion as applied to severed mineral estates embodied in Nilsen v. Tenneco, 614 P.2d 36 (1980), my views are ably discussed in the concurring in part, dissenting in part opinion of Mr. Justice Doolin in that case.
I am authorized to state that HODGES and DOOLIN, JJ., concur in the views expressed herein.