Court Opinion

ID: 9829882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:42:00.91508+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:08.208510
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
In this appeal the action of the lower court was affirmed with doubt as to eorrgctness of our ruling. Upon consideration of the motion for rehearing, the -conclusion is reached that we erred in so doing.
Without undertaking to state the pleadings in detail, it is sufficient to say that appellee sued to establish and foreclose a lien upon two lots and in the alternative to recover the title and possession of the lots. It was alleged the defendants were in possession and threatening to place certain improvements upon the lots which plaintiff did not wish placed thereon, and the cost thereof might become charges and liens against the lots.
In the state of the title to the lots as disclosed by the pleadings, defendants could not fix liens upon the lots for the cost of the threatened improvements, and it does not appear that such improvements would damage the property. We thinÉ no equitable, ground is shown for the issuance of the writ of injunction and the motion to dissolve should have been sustained.
Reversed, and judgment here rendered dissolving the injunction.
Reversed and rendered.