Court Opinion

ID: 9825692
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 13:56:35.885896+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:16.750746
License: Public Domain

Robins, J., on rehearing. Appellants in their petition for rehearing argue that under the provisions of Act 92 of the General Assembly of 1941 and Acts 161 and 340 of the Acts of 1947 appellant may have partition, in spite of the fact that appellee has a life estate in the land. None of these Acts was relied on by any of the parties in the instant case. But, since in the situation created by our holding, appellants might desire to invoke any valid provisions of these Acts, we amend our former opinion by eliminating therefrom the direction to dismiss appellants ’ prayer for partition. Appellees ’ petition for rehearing is denied.