Court Opinion

ID: 4223987
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-28 17:12:01.95089+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:52.432622
License: Public Domain

Matter of Pettus v Hubert (2017 NY Slip Op 08325)

Matter of Pettus v Hubert

2017 NY Slip Op 08325

Decided on November 28, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 28, 2017

Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing, Singh, JJ.

5058 123/17 -5258

[*1]In re James Pettus, Petitioner,
vJames W. Hubert, Respondent.

James Pettus, petitioner pro se.
John W. McConnell, New York (Shawn Kerby of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 28, 2017
CLERK