Court Opinion

ID: 4391621
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-29 13:00:22.923202+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:31:26.721141
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-10457    Date Filed: 04/29/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 18-10457
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 2:96-cv-00232-JES-CM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

MARK & ERIC FEINSTEIN,

                                                          Defendants-Appellants.
                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                  (April 29, 2019)

Before BRANCH, GRANT, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Mark and Eric Feinstein’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The magistrate judge’s January 4, 2018 order, as clarified on April 13, 2018, is not

final and appealable because it merely allowed post-judgment discovery to
              Case: 18-10457     Date Filed: 04/29/2019   Page: 2 of 2

proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Rouse Constr. Int’l, Inc. v. Rouse Constr. Corp.,

680 F.2d 743, 746 (11th Cir. 1982) (“[T]he granting of a post-judgment discovery

motion is not an appealable final order.”).

                                          2