Court Opinion

ID: 8622993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 11:00:18.146837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:34.293336
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Walmart, No. 2:07-cv-00247-PMD, 2007 WL 1203541 (D.S.C. April 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.