Court Opinion

ID: 4680471
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-04-23 14:06:46.705659+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:03:55.444583
License: Public Domain

RENDERED: APRIL 16, 2021; 10:00 A.M.
                        NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

                Commonwealth of Kentucky
                          Court of Appeals
                             NO. 2020-CA-1111-WC

LATONYA COVINGTON                                                    APPELLANT

                  PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION
v.              OF THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD
                        ACTION NO. WC-19-00189

FORD MOTOR COMPANY (KTP);
HON. ROARK S. GRANT,
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE;
AND WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
BOARD                                                                APPELLEES

                                   OPINION
                                  AFFIRMING

                                  ** ** ** ** **

BEFORE: ACREE, MCNEILL, AND L. THOMPSON, JUDGES.

ACREE, JUDGE: Latonya Covington appeals the Workers’ Compensation

Board’s (the Board) August 14, 2020 opinion. She believes the Board and the

administrative law judge (ALJ), misconstrued the statute of limitations and

improperly dismissed her claim. Finding no error, we affirm.
                                        BACKGROUND

                 Covington worked for Ford Motor Company as an assembly line

worker beginning in 2003 and as an inspector beginning in 2009. Her job required

her to move vehicles into a station, plug a device into each vehicle, and perform

various tests. She tested 17 to 18 vehicles every hour. Sometime in 2012 or 2013,

her left hand started bothering her. She went to the doctor who diagnosed her as

having carpal tunnel syndrome from work-related activities. After being

diagnosed, Covington continued working, but needed treatment to her hand.1 Her

symptoms never fully went away. This treatment continued until 2017, when she

was cleared to have surgery.

                 After her surgery, Ford assigned her to light duty, and allowed her to

perform only light duty when her symptoms flared. At present, Covington still

experiences numbness and burning in her left hand, has not regained full range of

motion and she has weakness in her left hand. Covington claims these symptoms

affected not just her work, but her daily life as well.

                 Ford paid all Covington’s medical bills and modified and

accommodated her work as an inspector. However, she is currently looking for

other jobs that would not be as strenuous to her arms and hands. Because of her

injury, Covington filed a Form 101 on February 19, 2019, alleging injury to her left

1
    Her treatment included physical therapy and injections.

                                                 -2-
hand and left thumb that became occupationally disabling after her surgery in

2017. Ford denied Covington’s claims, stating she was barred from recovery

under the requisite statute of limitations.

                The ALJ entered an opinion and order on April 6, 2020, dismissing

Covington’s claim for failure to file within the statute of limitations in KRS2

342.185. The ALJ found Covington’s carpal tunnel injury manifested on January

21, 2013, when the doctor informed her the condition was work-related. Given

that she continued working, the ALJ concluded Covington could not present any

evidence that her current condition or impairment rating was caused by cumulative

trauma arising from work-related activity between her 2017 surgery and the date

she filed her claim.

                Covington appealed the ALJ’s order to the Board. The Board

affirmed the order as it pertained to the statute of limitations. It stated, “As noted

by the ALJ, there is absolutely no evidence in the record establishing Covington

sustained a work-related left wrist injury within the two years prior to the filing of

her claim.” It went on to say, “Because we find the ALJ did not err in determining

Covington failed to prove she sustained a left hand or wrist injury within the two

years prior to the filing of her claim, we affirm his decision dismissing that portion

of her claim as untimely filed.”

2
    Kentucky Revised Statutes.

                                          -3-
             This appeal followed.

                            STANDARD OF REVIEW

             Because this case involves statutory interpretation, our review is de

novo. Saint Joseph Hosp. v. Frye, 415 S.W.3d 631, 632 (Ky. 2013).

                                     ANALYSIS

             KRS 342.185(1) provides for a two-year period of limitations that

begins to run upon the date of the work-related, injury-causing event. As to a

cumulative trauma injury, the Kentucky Supreme Court recognizes that these are

“gradual injuries [that] often occur imperceptibly” over a period of time. American

Printing House for the Blind v. Brown, 142 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Ky. 2004). As a

gradual injury, the date of such injury for notice and for statute of limitations

purposes is when the claimant was informed by a medical professional that she

suffered from a work-related cumulative injury. Id.; Hill v. Sextet Mining Corp.,

65 S.W.3d 503, 507 (Ky. 2001).

             Under KRS 342.185, the date of injury in a cumulative trauma claim

is when a medical professional tells the claimant a condition is work-related.

“Thus, for cumulative trauma injuries, the obligation to provide notice arises and

the statute of limitations does not begin to run until a claimant is advised by a

physician that he has a work-related condition.” Consol of Kentucky, Inc. v.

Goodgame, 479 S.W.3d 78, 82 (Ky. 2015); see also Hill, 65 S.W.3d at 507. Here,

                                          -4-
the doctor informed Covington of her injury in January of 2013. Therefore, the

statute of limitations period expired in 2015.

             However, Covington contends the limitations period was extended

under KRS 342.185(1) because Ford paid her TTD benefits subsequent to her

February 28, 2017 surgery. However, this payment does not revive her claim.

             The Kentucky Supreme Court opined in Holbrook v. Lexmark

International Group, Inc., that payment of benefits more than two years after an

injury does not revive a claim. 65 S.W.3d 908, 913 (Ky. 2001). Therefore,

Covington is unable to revive her claim merely because Ford decided to, and did,

pay her TTD benefits.

                                  CONCLUSION

             For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the Board’s August 14, 2020

opinion dismissing Covington’s claim.

             ALL CONCUR.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:                       BRIEF FOR APPELLEE FORD
                                           MOTOR COMPANY (KTP):
Nicholas Murphy
Louisville, Kentucky                       Joshua W. Davis
                                           Priscilla C. Page
                                           Louisville, Kentucky

                                         -5-