Court Opinion

ID: 6812612
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 18:56:18.624429+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:03:43.210875
License: Public Domain

Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The Traders and Truckers Bank became insolvent, and Murrell and other creditors of the bank instituted a suit against the directors to recover damages from them for gross neglect of duty upon their part. This case differs from that of Saunders v. *666Bank of Mecklenburg, ante, p. 656, 75 S. E. 94, just decided, in no material respect.
It seems that on the 9th of August, 1909, the bank made an assignment to Winston, trustee, of all of its assets, and that he, at a subsequent date, instituted suit, asking the aid and direction of a court of chancery in the administration of the trust. The bill in the case before us prays that it be heard along with the suit of Winston, Trustee, v. Traders and Truckers Bank, and it was suggested, in argument, that the bill in this case might be treated as a petition in that suit. There was a demurrer to the bill, which the circuit court sustained, and the bill was dismissed.
For the reasons given in the case of Saunders v. Bank of Mecklenburg, we are of opinion that there was no error in the decree. We cannot maintain the bill in this case, either as an original bill or as a petition, without doing violence to the principle there established, as it does not appear that any demand or request was made upon the trustee to proceed against those who are named as defendants in this suit. To hold that the bill could be treated as a petition would be a transparent effort to escape from a salutary principle of chancery pleading and practice.
We are of opinion that the decree should be affirmed.

Affirmed.