Court Opinion

ID: 8443353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 19:47:38.321532+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:51.570585
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG, 2011 WL 3903199 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.