Court Opinion

ID: 9498833
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 17:29:31.353439+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:59:06.269397
License: Public Domain

Judge WILKINSON wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Judge KING wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a petition for rehearing en banc, and appellee filed a response in opposition to the petition.
A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of judges *226in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Judges Michael, Motz, King, and Gregory voted to rehear the case en banc, and Chief Judge Wilkins and Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams, Trader, Shedd, and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc.
The Court denies the petition for rehearing en banc.