Court Opinion

ID: 8621992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 09:34:28.259257+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:33.109051
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen. See Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion). A motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of entry of a final removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), Petitioner’s motion to reopen would have been due no later than May 18, 2005. The record reflects that petitioner filed his motion on January 22, 2007. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.