Court Opinion

ID: 4146958
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-22 01:01:01.508973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:33.489145
License: Public Domain

Case: 16-40889      Document: 00513882887         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2017

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 16-40889
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAXIMO ANASTACIO-MORALES,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:15-CR-1428-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Maximo Anastacio-Morales
raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria,
831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016)
(No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which
defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2014), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40889   Document: 00513882887    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2017

                               No. 16-40889

Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d
at 672. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and
the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                     2