Court Opinion

ID: 7212826
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 22:35:48.074158+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:16:54.906441
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Angelo Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muldrow v. City of Florence, No. CA-01-3701-0-18-BD (D.S.C. July 15, 2002). Muldrow’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.