Court Opinion

ID: 803440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-06-29 20:19:10+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:36.287532
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 29 2012

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-10543

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00350-LRH

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
JAMAR BELIN,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                             for the District of Nevada
                     Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted June 26, 2012 **

Before:        SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

       Jamar Belin appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
      Belin contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because his

supervised release violations were technical and he had shown improvement with

his drug abuse. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing

factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the within-Guidelines sentence is

reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                    11-10543