Court Opinion

ID: 5578376
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:31:25.167406+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:00.770041
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
1. Under the facts of this case, the court did not err in granting a second new trial
Beck and Hiel, JJ. We dissent from the ruling made in the first headnote. Gregory v. Granite R. Co., 132 Ga. 587 (4), (64 S. E. 686); Dethrage v. Rome, 125 Ga. 802 (54 S. E. 654); Veal v. Robinson, 76 Ga. 838. See also: Cleveland v. Central R. Co., 73 Ga. 793; Cook v. W. & A. R. Co., 72 Ga. 48; Central R. Co. v. Opie, 58 Ga. 346; Turner v. Rome St. R. Co., 81 Ga. 336 (6 S. E. 690); Veal v. Veal, 45 Ga. 511, 512; Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Randolph, 136 Ga. 505, 507 (71 S. E. 887).
2. Upon considering the assignments of error in the cross-bill of exceptions, the court is of the opinion that none of them show error requiring the grant of a new trial. .

•Judgment affirmed on both bills of exceptions.

All the Justices concur, except Beck and Rill, JJ., dissenting.