Court Opinion

ID: 9830993
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:41:08.220959+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:29.114612
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
(After due consideration of the very forceful motion for rehearing presented by counsel for appellants, we have reached the conclusion that the motion should be refused.
We think our construction of the answer of the appellee garnishee in our former opinion is the reasonable construction to be given the answer, and we do not care to add anything *256on this question to what is said in that opinion.
The question of whether there is sufficient pleading and evidence to establish the insolvency of the defendant Adams is not material to the determination of the appeftl if our construction of the answer of the garnishee is correct, and we did not in our former opinion affirmatively hold that such insolvency was shown.
Upon further consideration we agree with appellants’ counsel that the judgment cannot be sustained on this ground, and the suggestion in our former opinion that it might be is withdrawn.