Court Opinion

ID: 9300673
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-12-02 17:07:06.95438+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:13:40.391961
License: Public Domain

EMMONS, Circuit Judge,
gave an oral opinion, promising the bar at a future time to render a written and detailed decision. The following is a summary of the point decided: That the word “fine,” as defined by Coke, Littleton, Blaekstone, and Chitty, includes imprisonment unless the money be paid; for, as stated by the former, “to a fine imprisonment regularly appertaineth.” That the practice at common law is as stated by Chitty; if the defendant be absent at the time of conviction, and the offense is finable only the proper judgment is “quod eapiatur”; but if the defendant be present and does not pay the fine, that he stand committed to jail until the fine be paid. Ex parte Watkins, 7 Pet [32 U. S.] 574, distinctly recognises and affirms this doctrine. Kane v. People, 8 Wend. 206; Reg. v. Dunn, 12 Adol. & E. 1241, 12 Wend. 344.
The counsel for defendant urge that although the common law authorized the imposition of imprisonment until the fine was paid, this does not, at least in the states, apply to statutory offences; and that so far as Ohio is concerned, the supreme court of the state, in 11 Ohio Reports, has decided that the common law mode of procedure does not exist here. We find no such distinction as that urged by the learned counsel, for the petitioner, which would confine the power of commitment to common law offences. On the contrary, nine-tenths of all the instances of its exercise are those of convictions under statutes. There is a long and unquestioned exercise of this right, both in England and this country. The cases in the Ohio Reports cited above, so far from denying the common law power concede it expressly, and only say, that in Ohio when the offence is statutory, they hold that the sentence should be confined to the letter of the law, and that the common law power is impliedly taken away or re yoked. Of course it is readily granted that there is no common law jurisdiction of crimes in this court; which is a very different question than looking to the common law for the mode of proceeding in criminal cases. The power to commit a person convicted of a statutory offence—where the statute imposes a fine—to jail until the' fine be paid, is, we think, an inherent power in the court derived from the common law.
The petition is accordingly refused.