Court Opinion

ID: 9848951
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 04:30:59.414792+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:55.265912
License: Public Domain

NEELY, Judge,
dissenting in part:
I concur in the result; however, I dissent to the cynical, ironic and manipulative citation to Whiting v. Whiting, 183 W.Va. 451, 396 S.E.2d 413 (1990). Whiting v. Whiting has not only been de facto overruled by Charlton v. Charlton, 186 W.Va. 670, 413 S.E.2d 911 (1991), it has also been made a laughing stock.