Court Opinion

ID: 9893721
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-30 14:00:44.347492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:05:36.321222
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 23-5155                                                September Term, 2023
                                                                      1:23-cv-01254-UNA
                                                      Filed On: October 30, 2023

Rembert D. Greeson,

              Appellant

       v.

Central Intelligence Agency and United
States of America,

              Appellees

            ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

       BEFORE:       Wilkins, Katsas, and Walker, Circuit Judges

                                    JUDGMENT

        This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

          ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s May 10, 2023 order be
affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that appellant’s complaint, which lacked
an arguable basis either in law or in fact, was frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490
U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (providing that “the court
shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal
. . . is frivolous or malicious”).

        Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
                                     ____________
No. 23-5155                                                September Term, 2023

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

                                       Per Curiam

                                                         FOR THE COURT:
                                                         Mark J. Langer, Clerk

                                                 BY:     /s/
                                                         Daniel J. Reidy
                                                         Deputy Clerk

                                          Page 2