Court Opinion

ID: 4376042
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-12 16:31:40.587942+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:18:05.469703
License: Public Domain

People v Pina-Rodriguez (2019 NY Slip Op 01722)

People v Pina-Rodriguez

2019 NY Slip Op 01722

Decided on March 12, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 12, 2019

Gische, J.P., Webber, Kern, Singh, JJ.

703/16 8677 1191/16 8676

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vLeonard Pina-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ross D. Mazer of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J.) rendered February 22, 2016 and June 8, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 12, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.