Court Opinion

ID: 9892571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-24 16:03:22.976488+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:20.305123
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12795   Document: 8-1      Date Filed: 10/24/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 23-12795
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      RYAN MCCORD CLARK,
                                                   Petitioner-Appellant,
      versus
      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Respondent-Appellee.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Alabama
                    D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cv-08019-KOB
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-12795     Document: 8-1     Date Filed: 10/24/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                23-12795

      Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Ryan Clark, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the
      district court’s June 13, 2023, order denying his 28 U.S.C.
      § 2255 motion. The statutory time limit required him to file a no-
      tice of appeal on or before August 14, 2023, the first Monday fol-
      lowing 60 days after the district court’s order. See 28 U.S.C.
      § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), 26(a)(1)(C). The notice of ap-
      peal, deemed filed on August 24, 2023, is therefore untimely, and
      we lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United
      States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Green v. Drug Enf’t Ad-
      min., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.