Court Opinion

ID: 1004410
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:41:03.205035+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:10.884398
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6114

EDDIE RAY SPIVEY,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DEWALT; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION,

                                           Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-347-5-BO)

Submitted:   May 17, 2001                     Decided:   May 25, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Ray Spivey, Appellant Pro Se. Jerri Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Eddie Ray Spivey appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Spivey v. Dewalt, No. CA-00-347-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 27,

2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2