Court Opinion

ID: 2944976
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 02:59:07.96308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:40.075532
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                              NOS. AP-76,569 & AP-76,570

       IN RE CHARLES KEVIN BOWEN AND JENNIFER BOWEN, Relators

                 ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION
                    IN CAUSE NOS. 09-649-K368 & 09-650-K368
                      IN THE 368 th DISTRICT COURT FROM
                            WILLIAMSON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              OPINION

        Relators are charged with capital murder and have mandamus applications currently under

submission at this Court that could decide who will represent them in the trial court. In re Charles

Kevin Bowen and Jennifer Bowen, AP-76,519 & AP-76,520 (argued and submitted May 4, 2011).

The trial court set the cases for pre-trial hearings and a trial setting in June. Relators responded with

motions to stay the proceedings which this Court construed as motions for leave to file applications

for prohibition. The Court invited the trial court and the State to submit responses.

        The State’s response suggests that the trial court simply kept the cases on the trial docket out
                                                                                                   2

of concern for the Relators’ already lengthy incarceration and in anticipation of this Court’s ruling

on the mandamus applications before the June 13, 2011 trial date. The State does not oppose a stay,

so long as neither the State nor the trial court are assigned fault for the delay.

        The Relators’ motions for leave to file writs of prohibition are granted. The issue of the

legality of the trial court’s disqualification of retained trial counsel in these capital murder

prosecutions is under submission at this Court. Further proceedings in the trial court before this

Court’s decision would nullify the pending mandamus applications. Accordingly, we conclude that

issuance of writs of prohibition are necessary in order to protect this Court’s jurisdiction. TEX .

CONST . art. V, § 5(c).

        The Respondent, the Judge of the 368th District Court of Williamson County, is directed to

stay the proceedings and is prohibited from taking further action in Cause Numbers 09-649-K368

and 09-650-K368 until this Court issues its decision in the Relator’s pending mandamus

applications, Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas cause numbers AP-76,519 and AP-76,520.

Filed: May 27, 2011

Do not publish