Court Opinion

ID: 1028783
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:46:21.641387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:01.261506
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 08-8602

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

DANIEL WOODS,

                  Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00025-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted:    April 23, 2009                  Decided:   May 4, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Woods, Appellant Pro Se.       Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Daniel    Woods     appeals   the   district     court’s    order

denying   his   motion   for   reconsideration   of   the   denial    of   his

motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006).    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.     See United States v. Woods, No. 3:05-cr-00025-

JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 8, 2008).             We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                     2