Court Opinion

ID: 3192177
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-07 16:05:21.490935+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:05:23.308835
License: Public Domain

Matter of Lamborn (2016 NY Slip Op 02726)

Matter of Lamborn

2016 NY Slip Op 02726

Decided on April 7, 2016

Appellate Division, First Department

Per Curiam

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 7, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION
First Judicial Department

John W. Sweeney, Jr., Justice Presiding,
Rolando T. Acosta
Dianne T. Renwick
Sallie Manzanet-Daniels
Barbara R. Kapnick,	Justices.

M-6431 

[*1]In the Matter of Richard D. Lamborn, an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Richard D. Lamborn, (OCA Atty. Reg. No. 2124188) Respondent.

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department. Respondent, Richard D. Lamborn, was admitted to the Bar of the State of New York at a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court for the Fourth Judicial Department on March 16, 1987.

Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental
Disciplinary Committee, New York
(Orlando Reyes, of counsel), for petitioner.
Respondent pro se.

Per Curiam

Respondent Richard D. Lamborn was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Fourth Judicial Department on March 16, 1987. At all times relevant herein, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) seeks an order, pursuant to the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 603.11, accepting respondent's [*2]resignation from the practice of law and striking his name from the roll of attorneys. Respondent's affidavit of resignation, sworn to November 23, 2015, complies with section 603.11.
Respondent states that he is aware that he is the subject of disciplinary charges currently pending before a Referee alleging that he misappropriated and/or intentionally converted funds belonging to others for his own use and benefit in violation of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.00), namely, rule 1.15(a) and rule 8.4(c).
Specifically, respondent acknowledges that during his May 13, 2015 examination under oath before the Committee he testified, inter alia, that he used approximately $2,400 that belonged to a client whom he represented in a dispute with his commercial landlord, for his own personal purposes. Respondent further testified that he used approximately $1,500 which belonged to an estate for his own personal purposes (see 22 NYCRR 603.11[a][2)). Respondent testified that he reimbursed both the client and the estate.
Respondent acknowledges disciplinary charges were brought against him predicated on the allegations at issue and that, he can not successfully defend himself on the merits against the charges (see 603.11[a][3]).
Respondent's affidavit fully complies with 22 NYCRR 603.11 and is therefore accepted by this Court (see e.g. Matter of Weintraub, 123 AD3d 135 [1st Dept 2014]; Matter of Teplen, 120 AD3d 139 [1st Dept 2014]).
Accordingly, the Committee's motion should be granted, and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2015.
All concur.
Order Filed. 	April 7, 2016Sweeney, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, and Kapnick, JJ.
Respondent disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2015. Opinion Per Curiam. All concur.