Court Opinion

ID: 9824871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 11:35:11.768883+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:10.945752
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The contention that error to reverse affects the decree sustaining demurrer to the amended bill, in the particular that the decree dismissed “the bill of complaint as amended,” .without allowing opportunity to amend, is not well founded, for that the ruling was made in term time, and the record does not disclose that the privilege of amendment was either sought by appellant or denied by the trial court upon the occasion of sustaining, the demurrer to the amended bill. Mohon v. Tatum, 69 Ala. 466, 470; Buford v. Ward, 108 Ala. 307, 314, 19 South. 357.
The rehearing is denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN, SOMERVILLE, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.