Court Opinion

ID: 9482760
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 08:59:41.933142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:49:11.313131
License: Public Domain

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
May 11, 1992.
Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH and ROSENN,* Circuit Judges.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant pro se in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.