Court Opinion

ID: 9946897
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-01 18:01:23.26335+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:42.878530
License: Public Domain

FOR PUBLICATION

   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
        FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and        No. 20-56254
as Successor in Interest to Albert
Dorsey, deceased,                          D.C. No.
                                        2:19-cv-05370-
              Plaintiff-Appellee,          CAS-JC

 v.                                        ORDER

EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual,

              Defendant-Appellant,

and

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a
municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10,

              Defendants.

                  Filed March 1, 2024

  Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and
            Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

                            Order
2                     SMITH V. AGDEPPA

                          ORDER

    Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the
petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant
the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised
of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a
vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter
failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused
active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App.
P. 35(a). Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65,
is DENIED.