Court Opinion

ID: 988530
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:53:41.591468+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:38.171496
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-2362

JESSE R. LANCE,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WONDERLYN BELL,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-95-884-2-8BD)

Submitted:   February 7, 1996          Decided:     February 15, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse R. Lance, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice Appellant's attempt to directly appeal an order

entered by the South Carolina Supreme Court. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommenda-

tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lance v.
Bell, No. CA-95-884-2-8BD (D.S.C. June 6, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                  2