Court Opinion

ID: 993205
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:04:15.186625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:20.556105
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CAROL BRAMWELL,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-429-A, CA-97-682-AM)

Submitted:   September 25, 1997           Decided:   October 9, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Bramwell, Nos. CR-91-429-A; CA-97-682-AM
(E.D. Va. May 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2