Court Opinion

ID: 9954223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-25 20:11:39.048167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:11:59.326578
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
                              EASTERN DISTRICT

CHARLES PRINCE EDWARD TALBERT,                : No. 94 EM 2023
                                              :
                    Petitioner                :
                                              :
                                              :
              v.                              :
                                              :
                                              :
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON                  :
PLEAS AND PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT               :
ATTORNEYS OFFICE,                             :
                                              :
                    Respondents               :

                                      ORDER

PER CURIAM

      AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2024, the “Mandamus Action” is DISMISSED.

See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid

representation is impermissible).   The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the

“Mandamus Action” to counsel of record.

      The “Petition for Supplemental Mandamus” is DENIED.