Court Opinion

ID: 1004934
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:48:51.521398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:27.882976
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Frank A. Balear appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Balcar v. Avemco Ins. Co.,
  
  No. CA-99-148-5 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 21, 2000). We deny Avemco’s motion for sanctions against Balear. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.