Court Opinion

ID: 6946624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:26:21.344762+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:56.231313
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of being an inmate in possession of a weapon. ORS 166.275. The trial court imposed a departure sentence of 60 months’ imprisonment based on findings that defendant had persistently been involved in similar offenses and that prior sanctions had not deterred defendant’s criminal conduct. On appeal, defendant argues that, under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), the court erred in imposing that sentence based on facts that were not found by a jury or admitted by defendant, in violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Although defendant did not advance such a challenge to the trial court, he argues that the sentence should be reviewed as plain error. Under our decision in State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005), the sentence is plainly erroneous. For the reason set forth in Perez, we exercise our discretion to correct the error.
Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.