Court Opinion

ID: 3064119
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-14 21:20:42.25696+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:20.591961
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              JAN 21, 2009
                               No. 08-12608                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 07-00149-CR-1-003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

MICHAEL NELSON MURPHY,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Alabama
                       _________________________

                             (January 21, 2009)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Joe Carl Jordan, appointed counsel for Michael Nelson Murphy, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Murphy’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

                                          2