Court Opinion

ID: 9803769
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 16:00:45.133224+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:03:48.958553
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 23-1705
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                            Quavo Delmontae Williams

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: August 28, 2023
                              Filed: August 31, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Quavo Williams appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after the
court vacated one count of conviction and resentenced him. His counsel has moved

      1
       The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
to withdraw, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 36 U.S. 738
(1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

       Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in imposing
the below-Guidelines sentence that Williams received. See United States v. Feemster,
572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681,
684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). We have also independently reviewed the record
under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues
for appeal.

      Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
                     ______________________________

                                         -2-