Court Opinion

ID: 7429067
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:51:19.39486+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:26.809403
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 6, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essentia! requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. The motion for respondent’s attorney’s fee is granted in the sum of $250.-00.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN, and HOPPING, JJ., concur.