Court Opinion

ID: 5184569
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 04:46:38.787523+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:41.608717
License: Public Domain

O’Brien, J. (dissenting):
I dissent for the reason that there was no proof that the plates sold were not of “ ordinary Bessemer” steel and “soft for stamping,” the same quality as those theretofore ordered. There was no *298specific warranty that they would be suitable for “ tops and bottoms of Raines boilers.” Defendants did not know to what use they were to be pat; and this case, therefore, is like Dounce v. Dow (64 N. Y. 415).
Van Brunt, P. J., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.