Court Opinion

ID: 9921003
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-19 00:09:24.650215+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:02.253557
License: Public Domain

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed March 18, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.