Court Opinion

ID: 9838607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-07 00:00:31.901473+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:08.141933
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-11250         Document: 00516886074             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/06/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 22-11250
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                              September 6, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jerry Lee Bledsoe,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 5:21-CR-36-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jerry Lee
   Bledsoe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bledsoe has not filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-11250    Document: 00516886074          Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/06/2023

                                  No. 22-11250

   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2