Court Opinion

ID: 4224092
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-28 20:00:43.14146+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:52.300448
License: Public Domain

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Daniel Bradshaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Bradshaw’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradshaw v. Berryhill, No. 1:16-cv-00969-LO-JFA, 2017 WL 958105 (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

  AFFIRMED