Court Opinion

ID: 9865473
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 18:00:31.290551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:25.074809
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10390         Document: 00516906868             Page: 1      Date Filed: 09/25/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10390
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                             September 25, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Nathan Pokrajac,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 2:22-CR-89-2
                      ______________________________

   Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Nathan Pokrajac has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Pokrajac has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10390    Document: 00516906868         Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/25/2023

                                 No. 23-10390

   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2