Court Opinion

ID: 3546529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:57:06.607691+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:16.417923
License: Public Domain

REQUESTED BY:  Senator Leland Klein
You have requested an Attorney General's Opinion on the validity of AM4268, an amendment to LB 1121.  Specifically, you have questioned whether the amendment can constitutionally be applied retroactively to existing ethanol production contracts.
AM4268 to LB 1121 provides that "No credit shall be given on ethanol produced for or sold for use in the production of distilled spirits."  Thus, AM4268 places an additional restriction on ethanol producers to qualify for production credits.
This office has addressed nearly identical questions previously.  See Op. Att'y Gen. No. 95043 (May 30, 1995) and Op. Att'y Gen. No. 80 (April 24, 1981).  For the reasons stated in those opinions, we conclude that AM4268 to LB 1121 must be construed to apply only prospectively, and may not be applied retroactively to existing ethanol production credit agreements between ethanol producers and the Nebraska Department of Revenue.
The Amendment does not state that it is intended to apply retroactively, and a statute may not operate retroactively where it would impair the obligation of a contract or interfere with a vested right.  State ex rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage FinanceFund, 204 Neb. 445, 464, 283 Neb. 2d 12 (1979).
Sincerely yours,
                                DON STENBERG Attorney General
                                L. Steven Grasz Deputy Attorney General
APPROVED BY:
Don Stenberg
Attorney General