Court Opinion

ID: 3886922
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:16:23.800588+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:32.085696
License: Public Domain

February 25, 1908. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of a magistrate for loss of freight while in the possession of the defendant, $7.13, and the statutory penalty, $50.00, for failure to adjust the loss within ninety days.
Appellant, under its first exception, endeavors to raise the question as to the constitutionality of the act approved May 13, A.D. 1903, entitled "An act to further define connecting lines of common carriers and to fix their liabilities." There is, however, no basis for the exception in the record. No liability of a connecting carrier is involved; the undisputed evidence being that the goods were delivered to defendant and the loss accrued while in defendant's possession.
Under the second exception, appellant assails the constitutionality of the penalty statute approved February 23, 1903, entitled "An act to regulate the manner in which common carriers doing business in this State shall adjust freight charges and claims for the loss of or damage to freight." This question is settled against appellant by the case of Charles v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co.,78 S.C. 36, which has been approved in other cases.
The remaining exceptions, alleging the total absence of evidence to sustain the judgment, can not be sustained. *Page 372 
The original bill of lading introduced in evidence showed receipt by defendant of six boxes of crackers consigned to plaintiff, Greelyville, S.C. and defendant's receipt to the plaintiff consignee at Greelyville, S.C. for freight charges on five of said boxes and acknowledging shortage of one box (for loss of which the suit was brought) showed that the loss occurred while the goods were in defendant's possession.
The judgment of the Court is affirmed.