Court Opinion

ID: 1009458
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:56:24.01655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:29:08.840728
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONNIE LOGAN,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-00-68, CA-02-274)

Submitted:   December 19, 2002            Decided:   January 7, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Ronnie Logan seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Logan has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.   See United States v. Logan,

Nos. CR-00-68; CA-02-274 (W.D.N.C. filed July 29, 2002 & entered

July 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2