Court Opinion

ID: 3169496
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-14 07:10:05.877229+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:08.204886
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-82,138-03

                        EX PARTE HAROLD LEON RYALS, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 20140D00184 IN THE 41ST DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM EL PASO COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

assault of a public servant and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment for each count. He did not

appeal his convictions. Applicant’s first writ application did not challenge the legal validity of the

conviction or sentence.

        Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because he conducted no independent investigation of the charges and insisted that Applicant plead

guilty, against his wishes. Applicant also alleges that counsel misinformed him about his right to a
                                                                                                      2

speedy trial and used Applicant’s confinement in the County Jail as leverage to coerce him into

pleading guilty without prior discussion of Applicant’s options.

       Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

       The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant would have

insisted on a trial, but for counsel’s deficient performance. The trial court shall also make any other

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 13, 2016
Do not publish