Court Opinion

ID: 2691494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:05:19.986024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:24:55.413162
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brenner, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1237, 2010-Ohio-4678.]

                         DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BRENNER.
                      [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brenner,
                        126 Ohio St. 3d 1237, 2010-Ohio-4678.]
 (No. 2008-2438 — Submitted August 26, 2010 — Decided September 2, 2010.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Todd A. Brenner, Attorney
Registration No. 0051839, last known business address in Dublin, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 29, 2009,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially
complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
Therefore,
        {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the
practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Brenner, 122 Ohio
St.3d 523, 2009-Ohio-3602, 912 N.E.2d 1116.
        BROWN,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,     LUNDBERG       STRATTON,          O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                              ______________________