Court Opinion

ID: 4292286
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-07-07 00:00:19.153118+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:37:54.181618
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-11017      Document: 00514544437         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/06/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 17-11017                      United States Court of Appeals

                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                          July 6, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEDRICK CORTEZ HAWKINS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:16-CR-78-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Kedrick Cortez Hawkins has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Hawkins has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hawkins’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11017    Document: 00514544437     Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/06/2018

                                 No. 17-11017

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2