Court Opinion

ID: 996440
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:50:42.964214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:54.324485
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 97-7710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

WALTER EUGENE HOFFMAN,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-94-132, CA-97-608-R)

Submitted:   August 31, 1998             Decided:   September 21, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Eugene Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hoffman, Nos. CR-94-132; CA-97-608-R (W.D.

Va. Sept. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2