Court Opinion

ID: 9758088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 23:10:36.586582+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:59:03.723814
License: Public Domain

Justice JOHNSON,
joined by Justice O’NEILL, concurring.
I agree that mandamus relief should be denied because factual disputes exist. Once that conclusion has been reached and expressed, however, no further controversy is before us as this matter is postured. I would not opine as to what relief is appropriate in the event of future hearings and if particular factual determinations result from those hearings.
Further, although I joined with Justice Wainwright in dissenting from the Court’s decisions in Francis and Holcomb and still believe that those cases were wrongly decided, the cases are now precedent of this Court. Thus, I cannot join his dissent. I concur in the Court’s decision to deny relief.