Court Opinion

ID: 3170367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-01-19 17:01:05.636216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:07.097975
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-13733   Date Filed: 01/19/2016   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 15-13733
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

         D.C. Docket Nos. 1:15-cv-00053-RDP; 14-bkc-40157-JJR11

In re: ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC.,

                                        Debtor.
__________________________________________________________________

STEPHEN MUSILINO,
SYCAMORE MARBLE COMPANY, INC.,
MEDITERRANEAN EXPORTS, INC.,

                                             Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC.,
BLUE DEVIL INVESTMENTS, INC.,
DAVID LUCE,
CREDIT STRATEGY ADVISORS, INC.,
TBGS QUARRY, LLC,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.
              Case: 15-13733     Date Filed: 01/19/2016   Page: 2 of 2

                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Alabama
                          ________________________

                                 (January 19, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      After an independent review of the record, we affirm the District Court’s

July 20, 2015, order denying Appellants’ appeal from the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Appellants challenge a

settlement agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court, asking that this Court

effectively undo all or part of that agreement. As the District Court properly held,

the appellants’ claims must be denied on equitable mootness grounds. See

Musilino v. Ala. Marble Co. Inc., 534 B.R. 820 (N.D. Ala. 2015). As such, we

affirm the District Court’s judgment.

      AFFIRMED.

                                          2