Court Opinion

ID: 2922044
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:51:41.253339+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:13.199986
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-05-078-CV
 
                         COURT OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 
___________________________________________________________________
 
ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION,                  Appellant,
 
                                           v.
 
E. I.
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY,               Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                 On appeal from the 357th  District Court
                          of Cameron
County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM OPINION
 
       Before Chief Justice Valdez
and Justices Castillo and Garza
Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 
Appellants, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, PUGET PLASTICS CORPORATION, PUGET
PLASTICS CORPORATION S.A. DE C.V., AND UNITED PLASTICS GROUP, INC.,
perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th
District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-12-5926-E.  

Appellants, Puget
Plastics Corporation and Puget Plastics Corporation S.A. de C.V., filed a
motion to dismiss their appeal against appellees on May 23, 2005.  On June 16, 2005, appellants= motion to
dismiss  was granted.  The appeal as to these parties was severed
from the original appeal, docketed under cause number 13-05-351-CV, and
dismissed.  
Appellant, United
Plastics Group, Inc., filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against appellees on
June 24, 2005.  On July 7, 2005,
appellant=s motion to dismiss
was granted.  The appeal as to these
parties was severed from the original appeal, docketed under cause number
13-05-396-CV, and dismissed.
Appellant, Arctic
Slope Regional Corporation, has notified this Court that it should not be
listed as an appellant in this matter, that all claims have been resolved, and
the appeal should be dismissed.
The Court, having
considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that there are no remaining
issues in the appeal and the appeal should be dismissed.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 1st day of December, 2005.