Court Opinion

ID: 6632301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 20:38:09.724731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:26.970702
License: Public Domain

Opinion by
McClelland, P. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Okuda (23 C. C. P. A. 46, T. D. 47713) the plaster-of-paris statuettes in question were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 205 (e) as claimed; and wooden forks the same as those passed upon in Borgfeldt v. United States (T. D. 48585) were held dutiable at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.