Court Opinion

ID: 6986624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 03:17:23.80873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:09:29.102581
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam. This action was originally commenced before a Justice of the Peace by appellee, to recover damages sustained by her in consequence of intoxication of her husband, John Creed, caused by liquor sold to him by appellant. As the bill of exceptions does not state that it contains all the evidence given on the trial below, we must presume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury. Cogshall v. Beesley, 76 Ill. 445; Henry v. Holloway, 78 Ill. 356. In this action the husband was a competent witness in behalf of his wife: Davenport & Co. v. Ryan, 81 Ill. 218. We find no error. .Judgment affirmed.