Court Opinion

ID: 9809514
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 21:15:55.96305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:35.845087
License: Public Domain

MoNtgomeky, J.,
dissenting. This action was brought in the name of H. C. D'avis. On the trial he testified for himself that he had given the cow to his wife; that he had placed *305metallic tags in the cow’s ears with the name of his wife stamped on the tags; that the cow ran in the woods and on the farm, and that the farm belonged to his wife, and that there was no separation of the cow from the other cattle. That evidence, in my opinion, constituted a gift, and the Court should have dismissed the action upon the motion of the defendant.