Court Opinion

ID: 9892268
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-22 15:12:11.049171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:06.356601
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                                       NO. WR-95,160-01

                      EX PARTE HARRY LEE GRADNEY, Applicant

                ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                CAUSE NO. 1472795-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM HARRIS COUNTY

       Per curiam. YEARY, J. concurred.

                                          OPINION

       Applicant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance and was sentenced to eight

months’ imprisonment under Texas Penal Code § 12.44(a). Applicant did not file a direct appeal.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant discharged this sentence in 2016. The habeas court finds credible Applicant’s

assertion that he suffers current and potential future consequences arising from this conviction,

including trouble finding a job; enhanced penalties for future convictions; and potential

impeachment of his credibility in future judicial hearings. Therefore, Applicant is “confined” for

purposes of Article 11.07.
                                                                                                    2

       Applicant claims that he was denied due process through the use of material false evidence,

and that his guilty plea was involuntary. These claims relate to the discovery of misconduct by

former Houston Police Officer Gerald Goines, who was the primary officer involved in the alleged

offense. Based on the record, the habeas court finds that Applicant was denied due process by the

use of material false evidence against him, and that Applicant’s guilty plea was involuntary. Ex parte

Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022); Ex parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2014). The habeas court recommends granting relief on false evidence and involuntary plea

grounds. We agree.

       Relief is granted. Ex parte Chabot, 300 S.W.3d 768, 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). The

judgment in cause number 147279501010 in the 208th District Court of Harris County is set aside.

Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any

necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

       Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: October 18, 2023
Do not publish