Court Opinion

ID: 7773409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:57:36.890444+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:04.578368
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Stuart John Gregor pled nolo contendere to the charge of carrying a concealed firearm, reserving the right to appeal. We affirm. The trial court correctly concluded that the police had a reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry1 stop based on information regarding Gregor’s possession of the firearm, which came from a “citizen informant” rather than an “anonymous informant.” See State v. Maynard, 783 So.2d 226 (Fla.2001).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).