Court Opinion

ID: 9391380
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-02 11:09:10.52618+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:41.595658
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                         JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023

                                     NO. 03-22-00512-CR

                               Qusai Walid Zaqzouq, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

          APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
                BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible

error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                         JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023

                                     NO. 03-22-00559-CR

                               Qusai Walid Zaqzouq, Appellant

                                                v.

                                 The State of Texas, Appellee

          APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
                BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES
                  AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible

error in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.