Court Opinion

ID: 993061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:01:58.504681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:32.344299
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JOHN MICHAEL CERCEO,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge.
(CR-91-416-A, CA-96-1182-AM)

Submitted:   August 28, 1997          Decided:   September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Michael Cerceo, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Raymond Reitinger,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Cerceo, Nos. CR-91-416-A; CA-96-1182-AM
(E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2