Court Opinion

ID: 1020546
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:52:55.543182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:38.202754
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 05-7304

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARY ANN SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; WILLIAM
SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Corrections,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(CA-03-1705-RDB)

Submitted: September 26, 2006             Decided: September 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).       We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court.           See Pearson v.

Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D. Md. July 28, 2005).        We dispense with

oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                  - 2 -