Court Opinion

ID: 8405932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-27 00:00:18.628575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:47:05.331686
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-30128      Document: 00516523542         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/26/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                  No. 22-30128
                                Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                       October 26, 2022
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                  Clerk

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jerod Fedison,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                            USDC No. 2:10-CR-147-1

   Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Jerod Fedison has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Fedison has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-30128     Document: 00516523542         Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/26/2022

                                  No. 22-30128

   relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
   assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
   review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2