Court Opinion

ID: 9467774
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 01:56:29.712697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:40:31.455256
License: Public Domain

EDWARDS, Chief Judge,
dissenting in part and concurring in part.
I disagree strongly with the refusal to enforce the law set forth in the Interstate Agreement on Detainers and its interpretation by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340, 98 S.Ct. 1834, 56 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978), and this court’s interpretation in Stroble v. Anderson, 587 F.2d 830 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 940, 99 S.Ct. 1289, 59 L.Ed.2d 499 (1979). See also Mars v. United States, 615 F.2d 704, 708 (6th Cir.) (Edwards, dissenting), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 138, 66 L.Ed.2d 60 (1980).
I concur, however, with remand for consideration of the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel.