Court Opinion

ID: 6930589
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 23:57:49.311243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:09.767845
License: Public Domain

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur entirely in the court’s opinion with the limited exception of Part II.C. The majority cites no California law to explain what required element of an employment contract Arno has failed to plead. I would let the issue of whether Arno had an employment contract be decided by a jury. See Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654, 682, 254 Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373 (1988).