Court Opinion

ID: 988478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:52:53.812121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:37.950764
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 95-7842

THEODORE JERRY BOLICK,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh.     W. Earl Britt, District
Judge. (CA-95-755-5-BR)

Submitted:   January 18, 1996             Decided:   February 8, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Jerry Bolick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Bolick v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-
755-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2