Court Opinion

ID: 5169767
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-02 04:52:55.832317+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:26:01.115513
License: Public Domain

STEWART, J.,
Concurring. — I concur in the conclusion that this “judgment should be affirmed. I do not think Carlson is in a position to urge the provisions of sec. 2976, Rev. Codes, as against an action brought by the receiver to foreclose a pledge of stock given to secure an indebtedness due the bank. He cannot claim immunity in an action brought to repair the wrong done in violating'the statute. (Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bank v. Jenks, 7 Met. (48 Mass.) 592; 34 Cyc. 405.)