Court Opinion

ID: 1026567
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-05 07:08:23.116313+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:10.621252
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the order denying his motion to reopen a civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Wilder v. Glass Health Ass’n,
  
  No. l:97-cv-02103-FNS (D.Md. Dec. 26, 2007). Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.