Court Opinion

ID: 9955756
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-29 14:14:58.110788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:20.375168
License: Public Domain

RENDERED: MARCH 22, 2024; 10:00 A.M.
                        NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

                Commonwealth of Kentucky
                          Court of Appeals
                             NO. 2022-CA-1252-MR

JANET REYES HERNANDEZ                                               APPELLANT

                APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
v.                     FAMILY COURT DIVISION
                   HONORABLE DERWIN WEBB, JUDGE
                        ACTION NO. 19-CI-501697

RAUL HERNANDEZ MARCIAL                                                APPELLEE

                                   OPINION
                                  AFFIRMING

                                  ** ** ** ** **

BEFORE: CETRULO, GOODWINE, AND TAYLOR, JUDGES.

TAYLOR, JUDGE: Janet Reyes Hernandez brings this appeal from an October

10, 2022, Order of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Family Court Division, (family

court) amending the November 15, 2019, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,

and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (Decree) to reflect that Raul Hernandez

Marcial was the owner of certain real property. We affirm.
              Janet and Raul were married on September 29, 2012. The parties

separated in November of 2018, and Janet filed a petition for decree of dissolution

of marriage on June 5, 2019. A divorce Decree was entered November 15, 2019.

              On October 18, 2019, the parties appeared before the family court for

a case management conference (CMC). Janet was represented by counsel, and

Raul appeared pro se. During the CMC, the parties were able to reach a complete

agreement on all issues. Counsel for Janet recited the agreement on the record

before the family court. Relevant to the issue on appeal, Raul was awarded the

property located at 4907 Axtell Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky. Raul would assume

the debt on the 4907 Axtell Avenue, and Janet would transfer her interest by

quitclaim deed to Raul. The family court approved of the agreement and instructed

Janet’s counsel to prepare an order reflecting same. However, when the November

15, 2019, Decree was prepared, the property located at 4907 Axtell Avenue was

mistakenly awarded to Janet instead of Raul. No motion to alter, amend, or vacate

was filed following entry of the Decree.1

              On September 6, 2022, Raul filed a motion to amend the Decree.

Therein, Raul asserted there was a clerical error in the Decree when entered on

November 15, 2019, regarding ownership of 4907 Axtell Avenue. He sought relief

1
  Raul Hernandez Marcial was not aware of the mistake in the November 15, 2019, Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage as it was mailed by the Clerk
to the wrong address.

                                             -2-
to correct the error pursuant to Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure (CR) 60.02.

More specifically, Raul contended that the family court should have awarded him

4907 Axtell Avenue as evidenced by the video recording of the October 18, 2019,

CMC, where the parties agreed on the record that Raul would retain sole

ownership of the property. Thus, Raul maintained that a “clerical/typographical

error” had been made when the Decree was prepared in 2019. Raul’s September 6,

2022, Motion to Amend at 6. Raul further asserted that after the divorce, he

continued to reside at 4907 Axtell Avenue, continued to pay the mortgage, and

made improvements to the property.

             A hearing was subsequently conducted on Raul’s motion to amend the

Decree. Thereafter, on October 10, 2022, an Order was entered reflecting that the

Decree be “amended and otherwise corrected to reflect that” the real property

located at 4907 Axtell Avenue was awarded to Raul and that he was the rightful

owner. This appeal follows.

             Janet contends that the family court improperly granted Raul relief

pursuant to CR 60.02. More particularly, Janet asserts that relief pursuant to CR

60.02 is time-barred, and that CR 60.02 does not provide relief for clerical errors.

We agree that CR 60.02 was not the proper rule to obtain the relief sought by Raul.

Nonetheless, we do believe that the family court had the authority to correct the

clerical error in the Decree pursuant to CR 60.01.

                                         -3-
             CR 60.01, styled “Clerical Mistakes,” provides in relevant part, as

follows:

             Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of
             the record and errors therein arising from oversight or
             omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its
             own initiative or on the motion of any party and after
             such notice, if any, as the court orders.

A clerical error or mistake is generally one that is “made by a clerk or other

judicial or ministerial officer in writing or keeping records[.]” Cardwell v.

Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000). The rationale for the rule that a

clerical error may be corrected at any time is that the judgment did not accurately

reflect the rights and obligations of the parties as actually adjudicated by the Court.

See Aurora Loan Services v. Ramey, 144 S.W.3d 295, 298-99 (Ky. App. 2004)

(citations omitted) (emphasis added).

             In the case sub judice, the family court was merely correcting a

clerical error in the Decree to accurately reflect that the family court awarded 4907

Axtell Avenue to Raul. A review of the video recording of the CMC on October

18, 2019, clearly demonstrates that 4907 Axtell Avenue was awarded to Raul.

Unfortunately, the Decree entered November 15, 2019, mistakenly awarded the

property to Janet. This error went unnoticed by the parties, the family court, and

the attorneys for over a year until sometime in late 2021 or 2022. During that time,

                                          -4-
the parties conducted themselves in accordance with the property being awarded to

Raul. We believe that the error as to ownership of 4907 Axtell Avenue in the

family court’s November 15, 2019, Decree constitutes a clerical error subject to

correction under CR 60.01. This appears to be precisely the type of error the rule

was intended to correct.

            Therefore, we are of the opinion that the family court properly

amended the November 15, 2019, Decree to reflect that Raul was the true and

rightful owner of 4907 Axtell Avenue.

            For the foregoing reasons, the Order of the Jefferson Circuit Court,

Family Court Division, is affirmed.

            ALL CONCUR.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT:                      BRIEF FOR APPELLEE:

Enrique Lopez                             Paul J. Mullins
Edgewood, Kentucky                        Louisville, Kentucky

                                        -5-