Court Opinion

ID: 5414480
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 16:14:53.322064+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:56.973066
License: Public Domain

Giegerich, J.
The action is to recover damages for an alleged assault. The case has been tried twice, and a third trial has been ordered but has not yet been had. On the first trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment, which upon appeal to the Appellate Division was reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the *642appellant to abide the event. On the second trial the plaintiff again recovered a judgment, which was again reversed by the Appellate Division, a new trial being again ordered. The order of reversal upon the second appeal awarded costs to the appellant absolutely. The defendant has applied to the clerk to tax its costs and has included in its bill the costs of both trials and of both appeals. The clerk has refused to tax any costs. The effect of the orders of the Appellate Division seems quite clear. They do not in any way affect the costs in the trial court. They relate solely to the costs of the appeals. The costs of the first appeal have been awarded to the defendant conditionally. If it is finally successful in the action it will be entitled to these costs; otherwise no one will be entitled to them. The costs of the second appeal have been awarded to the defendant absolutely, and unless paid during the pend-ency of the action will be added to any costs to which it may become entitled upon rendition of the judgment which finally determines the controversy or set off against any costs to which the plaintiff may then become entitled. The costs in the trial court, including the costs of all trials which may have been had before a final determination is reached, will belong as a- matter of right to the successful party; subject only to the provision contained in subdivision 3 of section 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure that if the plaintiff recovers less than fifty dollars damages his costs cannot exceed the damages. The conclusions thus indicated are sustained by the cases of Howell v. Van Sicklen, 8 Hun, 524; affd., 70 N. Y..595; Belt v. Am. Central Ins. Co., 33 App. Div. 239; Berrent v. Simpson, 61 Misc. Rep. 611. It follows that the defendant is entitled to tax the costs of the second appeal and no other costs.
Ordered accordingly.