Court Opinion

ID: 8479948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 16:50:07.079437+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:30.402736
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Rodney Smith appeals from the district court’s order denying his motions for clarification of the judgment, clarification of his sentence, and to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 8:94-cr-00065-H-6 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.