Court Opinion

ID: 7628491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 18:15:33.116842+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:10.718762
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The respondent, A.G., appeals from his adjudication of delinquency for burglary and grand theft. The adjudication of delinquency for burglary is affirmed since the evidence established that A.G. actually participated. However, A.G.’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft must be reduced to petit theft since the State failed to offer evidence as to the value of the stolen property. See L.C. v. State, 579 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.