Court Opinion

ID: 995170
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:33:30.185396+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:58.167180
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6322

MIRIAM OLIVIA DURHAM,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

E. RICHARD BAZZLE, Warden; CHARLIE CONDON, At-
torney General of the State of South Carolina,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-97-3253-0-18BD)

Submitted:   May 14, 1998                   Decided:   June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miriam Olivia Durham, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina;
Leslie Brown Darwin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-
ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Durham v. Bazzle, CA-97-3253-0-18BD (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 1998). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2