Court Opinion

ID: 7887568
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 21:44:04.505397+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:31:47.896475
License: Public Domain

Pet' Chriam:

On November 11,1883, W. W. Cook brought an action against Jesse Boyd, Martin Cochran, and M. McGuire, charging them with driving wild and undomesticated cattle that were infected with a disease known as Texas or Spanish fever, into Kansas, and near to his premises and pasturing-ground; and that thereby the disease had been communicated to Cook’s cattle, causing the death of many of them, and damaging him in the sum of $2,500. He claimed a lien upon the cattle to the extent of the injury sustained, and they were taken into the possession of the sheriff, as the law permits. Subsequently, on the application of Cook and others who claimed like liens upon these cattle, the judge of the district court, at chambers, appointed T. A. McCleary as re*676ceiver, who took the cattle into his possession, and later, upon an order of the judge, sold the same. On November 6,1884, an application was made by the defendant below to vacate the appointment, aná to discharge the receiver and require him to pay over the proceeds of the sale of the cattle; which motion was heard by the court on November 11,1884, and overruled. Without waiting for the final disposition of the case in which the receiver was appointed, the defendants below bring this ruling here and ask a reversal of the same.
The order made denying the motion is not now reviewable in this court, and within the authorities Hottenstein v. Conrad, 5 Kas. 249; K. R. M. Co. v. A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co., 31 id. 90; Miller v. Noyes, 34 id. 13; Snavely v. Buggy Co., 36 id. 106; Burch v. Adams, ante, p. 639—the case must be dismissed from this court.