Court Opinion

ID: 8607158
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 04:17:05.79492+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:17.270226
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Otis 0. Edwards seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order imposing sanctions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Edwards seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Edwards’ motion for oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.