Court Opinion

ID: 4697010
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-19 00:00:29.576623+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:21.650269
License: Public Domain

Case: 20-40852      Document: 00515905917         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                 United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                  No. 20-40852                              June 18, 2021
                               Conference Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Jose Luis Vega-Vazquez,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:20-CR-1087-1

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Vega-
   Vazquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega-Vazquez has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40852    Document: 00515905917          Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/18/2021

                                  No. 20-40852

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2