Court Opinion

ID: 9644599
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 21:00:35.355999+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:11:30.387785
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7135     Doc: 14        Filed: 08/21/2023   Pg: 1 of 3

                                           UNPUBLISHED

                              UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                             No. 22-7135

        DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI,

                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; KEVIN
        PUNTURI, Warden, Pocahontas State Correction Center; DR. MULLINS, MD,
        Pocahontas State Correction Center; M. MURPHY, Psychologist Senior, Pocahontas
        State Correction Center; S. YATES, Health Authority, Pocahontas State Correction
        Center; T. HEFFINGER, ADA Coordinator, Pocahontas State Correction Center;
        C. SMALLING, Grievance Coordinator, Pocahontas State Correction Center; K.
        CROWDER, Western Regional Ombudsman,

                           Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
        Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00261-EKD-JCH)

        Submitted: July 28, 2023                                    Decided: August 21, 2023

        Before GREGORY and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
        Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7135      Doc: 14         Filed: 08/21/2023    Pg: 2 of 3

        David Joseph Annarelli, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Henry Schnetzler, FRITH,
        ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7135      Doc: 14        Filed: 08/21/2023     Pg: 3 of 3

        PER CURIAM:

              David Joseph Annarelli appeals the district court’s order granting summary

        judgment to Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record

        and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Annarelli

        v. Clarke, No. 7:20-cv-00261-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2022). We dispense with

        oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    3