Court Opinion

ID: 9692873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 16:09:46.629241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:19:37.655953
License: Public Domain

HENDERSON, Justice
(concurring).
Needless to say, this opinion comports with my dissenting view in Dean, 367 N.W. 2d 783-84, and I therefore concur, with special reference in said dissent to my expressions therein, most particularly, at 784, wherein I expressed, inter alia: “The South Dakota Department of Labor’s interpretation of the terms 'misconduct connected with his work,’ as specified in SDCL 61-6-14, cannot exceed the limits of the statutory intent.” (Citing Red Bird, 314 N.W.2d 95.)