Court Opinion

ID: 1001656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:58:37.637736+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:45:07.177440
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 00-6236

JOHNNY CRAWFORD ROBERTS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN H. BAKER, JR.,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-769-5-F)

Submitted:   May 11, 2000                     Decided:   May 16, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Crawford Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Johnny Crawford Roberts appeals the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Roberts’ motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Roberts v. Baker, No. CA-99-769-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5,

2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                 2