Court Opinion

ID: 9764837
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 03:41:28.633809+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:30:01.884773
License: Public Domain

SEERDEN, Justice,
dissenting on appel-lee’s motion for rehearing.
I would grant the motion for rehearing. In addition to the cases mentioned in my dissent of January 22, 1987, attention is called to the reasoning in First National Bank v. Peterson, 709 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.). At page 280, the Court rejected the contention that service of a Writ of Garnishment was defective. The Court stated that in its original brief, appellant admitted service of the writ and this constituted a judicial admission. This is strikingly similar to our case.
For this reason, as well as those set out in my original dissent, I would hold the judgment voidable only.