Court Opinion

ID: 6887985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 21:34:03.932457+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:05:46.199399
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The motion of appellant to recall the mandate and re-tax costs against the collector, is well founded. Cf. United States v. Nunnally Invest. Co., 316 U.S. 258, 62 S.Ct. 1064, 86 L.Ed. 1455, 140 A.L.R. 792; Huntley v. So. Oregon Sales, 9 Cir., 104 F.2d 153; United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co., D.C.E.D.Pa., 46 F.Supp. 356; Brauch v. Birmingham, D.C.N.D. Iowa, 49 F.Supp. 229.
The mandate is ordered recalled and the clerk ordered to tax the costs.