Court Opinion

ID: 816805
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-02-01 01:46:12.336606+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:20.546382
License: Public Domain

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

                                           NO . 97-1683

                               RAYMOND G. MAXSON , APPELLANT ,

                                                 V.

                                    ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,
                          SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

           Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and HOLDAWAY and GREENE, Judges.

                                            ORDER

        On July 6, 1999, the Court issued an opinion affirming the July 31, 1997, Board of Veterans'
Appeals (Board) decision that had determined that Mr. Maxson's partial colectomy, received prior
to active service, was not aggravated by his combat service and thus had denied his reopened claim
for VA service-connected benefits. See Maxson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 453 (1999). On July 28, 1999,
judgment was entered. On August 2, 1999, Mr. Maxson filed, through counsel, an appeal to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit).

        On October 27, 2000, the Federal Circuit affirmed this Court's July 1999 decision and
returned the matter to this Court. See Maxson v. Gober, 230 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2000). On
November 9, 2000, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat.
2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA), was enacted. In accordance with In Re: Veterans Claims Assistance
Act of 2000, 15 Vet.App. 27 (2001) (en banc order) (Misc. Order 4-00), the July 28, 1999, judgment
was recalled. Further, Misc. Order 4-00 invited the parties to provide memorandum of law on the
impact that the VCAA could have on Mr. Maxson's claim. The parties did not file any responses
pursuant to Misc. Order 4-00. On August 31, 2001, Misc. Order 4-00 was rescinded. See In Re:
Rescission of Misc. No. 4-00, In Re: Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, U.S. Vet. App. Misc.
Order No. 6-01 (Aug. 31, 2001) (en banc order).

       Because neither party has argued the beneficiality of the VCAA in this case, the Court will
not address it and, accordingly, will enter judgment. See Tellex v. Principi, __ Vet.App. __, __, No.
98-1886 (Sept. 25, 2001); Williams v. Principi, __ Vet.App. __, No. 98-1491 (Aug. 31, 2001) (en
banc) (Court did not address applicability of VCAA to claim pending on appeal when VCAA
enacted). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

        ORDERED that judgment on the Court's July 6, 1999, opinion is entered. This order
constitutes the mandate of the Court.
DATED:   October 10, 2001       PER CURIAM.

                            2