Court Opinion

ID: 4268186
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-24 00:08:42.147505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:25.310586
License: Public Domain

FlLEl

State of Vermont APR 2 § 2911
Superior Court_Environmental Division

 

 

 

 

VERMONT
______________ MMM===
ENTRY REGARDING MoTIoN ENV‘“ONMENTALDW‘S‘°N
In re Saman ROW Am)roval Docket No. 176-10-10 Vtec

 

(Appeal from ToWn of Plainfield
Development Review Board decision)

Title: Motion to Amend iStatement of Questions (Filing No. 1)
Fi1ed: January 24, 2011
Filed By: Elizabeth H. MaGill, Attorney for Appellant William Basa

Response in Opposition filed on 3/2/11 by Thomas Hayes, Attorney for Appellee/Applicant Peter Saman
Reply filed on 3/10/ll by Elizabeth H. MaGill, Attorney for Appellant William Basa

LGranted _ Denied _~ Other

William Basa has appealed an on-the-record decision of the Town of Plaini`ield Development
Review Board (“DRB”) approving Peter Sarnan’s (“Applicant”) application for the use of a right-of-way that
connects his property at 351 Bartlett Road to Lindemann Lane. Mr. Basa submitted a two-question
Statement of Questions on November 17, 2010 and now seeks, by way of motion filed on January 24, 201l,
to amend his Statement of Questions by adding three additional questions

Similar to how the Civil Division addresses motions to amend complaints, this Court libera11y grants
motions to amend statements of questions when the other parties involved in the appeals are not unfairly
prejudiced by our doing so. In re Ridgewood Estates Homeowners Ass’n, No. 57-4-10 Vtec, slip op. at 7
`(Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div. Jan. 26, 20l1) (Wright, J.) (citing Appeal of Town of Fairfax, No. 45-3 -03 Vtec,
slip op. at 5 (Vt. Envtl. Ct. June 13, 2005) (Wright, J.)). We look for the same concerns as the Civil Division
does when determining whether to grant a motion to amend a complaint; that is, we consider if there has
been undue delay or bad faith by the moving party, whether the other parties will be prejudiced, and whether
the amendment will be futile. Cf. Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, 1[ 4, 184 Vt. l; See In re Huntington
Remodeling Application, No. 210-l0-07 Vtec, slip op. at 4-5 (Vt. Envtl. Ct. Nov. 5, 2008) (Durkin, J.). We
also take into account that the Statement of Questions not only serves to provide parties with notice of the
issues to be determined during litigation, like a civil complaint, but also serves to limit the scope of the
appeal. See V.R.E.C._P. 5(t`); Appeal of Town of Fairfax, No. 45-3-03 Vtec, slip op. at 4.

 

 

 

Here, Mr. Basa seeks to expand his Statement of Questions by adding three Questions to the original
two he submitted He filed his motion to amend approximately two-and-a-half months after he filed his
original Statement of Questions and after the DRB issued its November 5, 2011 decision.

Applicant argues that Mr. Basa’s motion should be denied because the three additional Questions
raise new issues for our review rather than clarify the previous Questions. Even if we accept Applicant’s
characterization of the new Questions, Applicant has made no clear showing that he will be prejudiced by the
addition of issues at this stage in the litigation Applicant also has not alleged that Mr. Basa has acted in bad
faith, and we fail to find Mr. Basa’s delay of less than three month undue. Compare Appeal of Town of
Fairfax, No. 45 -3 -03 Vtec, slip op. at 4 (denying a party the opportunity to amend its Statement of Questions
when such amendment was sought after summary judgment had been issued against that party and when the
timing appeared to include a tactical decision). Lastly, Mr. Basa’s additional three Questions seem more

fn re Saman ROWAQQFOV&Z, No. 276-1 0~10 Vtec (EO on Motion to Amend) (4-2]-]1) Pg. 2 on

tangentially related to his original Questions than wholly separate from them. For all these reasons we
GRANT Mr. Basa’s motion to amend.

QWQR

April 21, 2011
Thomas\§. Durkin, Judge

Date

Date copies sent to: »<./`//5/2 /'/// Clerk's Initials g »¢»" (
Copies sent to: l

Elizabeth H. MaGill, Attomey for Appellant Wi1liam Basa

Thomas Hayes, Attomey for Appellee/Applicant Peter Saman

Robert Halpert, Attomey for Interested Person Town of Plainfield

Brice C. Simon, Attomey for Interested Person Brenda Lindemann