Court Opinion

ID: 4448788
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-10-22 16:07:27.383904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:27:59.289538
License: Public Domain

People v Canty (2019 NY Slip Op 07535)

People v Canty

2019 NY Slip Op 07535

Decided on October 22, 2019

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 22, 2019

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Webber, Kern, JJ.

10151 5346/16

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vJames Canty, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Anthony Ferrara, J.), rendered August 21, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 22, 2019
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.