Court Opinion

ID: 9538656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 07:39:04.207753+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:03.920342
License: Public Domain

MR. JUSTICE ANDERSON:
(dissenting).
I agree generally with what has been said by Mr. Justice Angstman but wish to make the further comment.
Since the opinion by this court in Hardenburgh v. Harden-burgh, 115 Mont. 469, 146 Pac. (2d) 151, the questions regarding venue have caused the practicing lawyer and the students of the subject considerable concern. See Montana Law Review, Vol. X, 1949, p. 83 et seq.
Nothing said in the majority opinion tends to reduce the confusion that exists on the subject. It merely disposes of the present controversy and in my judgment lends no help to the lawyer who may find himself confronted with questions of venue in the future.