Court Opinion

ID: 2755878
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-26 20:03:26.457573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:38:03.542826
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 41795

STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 831
                                                 )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: November 26, 2014
                                                 )
v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                 )
RENE RAMOS,                                      )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                 )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                      )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                 )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum
       period of confinement of two, for battery on a peace officer, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy
       Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                     Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
                                 and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Rene Ramos pled guilty to battery on a peace officer. Idaho Code § 18-915(3). The
district court sentenced Ramos to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of
confinement of two. Ramos appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by
imposing an excessive sentence.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

                                                1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Ramos’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2