Court Opinion

ID: 4150642
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-07 17:09:26.721915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:37.797426
License: Public Domain

People v Victorino (2017 NY Slip Op 01653)

People v Victorino

2017 NY Slip Op 01653

Decided on March 7, 2017

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 7, 2017

Acosta, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Webber, JJ.

3329 982/12

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —
vJosé Victorino, Defendant-Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Joseph M. Nursey of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Judith Lieb, J.), rendered October 23, 2014,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: MARCH 7, 2017
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.