Court Opinion

ID: 811490
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-11-07 20:08:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:33:26.995378
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 12-7008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1)

Submitted:   November 2, 2012             Decided:   November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.     Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Shane Neel Cralle, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his

sentence.     We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.      United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1

(E.D. Va. May 18, 2012).      We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials   before    the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                   AFFIRMED

                                     2