Court Opinion

ID: 30871
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 10:07:26+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:39.655604
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS          April 24, 2003
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

                            No. 02-11149
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN F. MONAHAN,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 2:02-CR-36-1
                        --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John F.

Monahan has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967).   Monahan has filed a response challenging the district

court’s failure at sentencing to account for his cooperation with

the Government, the amount of restitution ordered by the district

court, and the district court’s victim identification.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 02-11149
                                -2-

     Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Monahan’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.