Court Opinion

ID: 8029880
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:03:12.851626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.129273
License: Public Domain

On May 16, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to Six (6) years in the Montana State Prison for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Burglary, a felony.
On August 8, 2005, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
*103The defendant was present and was represented by Clinton Kammerer. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Ride 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 8th day of August, 2005.
DATED this 17th day of August, 2005.
Chairperson, Hon. Gary L. Day, Member, Hon. John Whelan and Member, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding.