Court Opinion

ID: 9831927
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:29:01.241629+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:39.476083
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
The contention that, construing the contract as the trial court and this court construed it, appellee nevertheless was not entitled to recover anything of appellant because it appeared the oil was to be furnished for fuel purposes only, and did not appear that appellee paid more than 5 cents a gallon for the oil it purchased for such purposes from other parties, is made for the first time in the motion. Therefore appellant is not entitled to have it considered, but if it was considered the contention would be overruled; for we think the trial court had a right to assume that appellee paid the market price, shown to have been 12 cents a gallon, for the oil it so purchased.
The motion is overruled.