Court Opinion

ID: 804935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-07-23 16:25:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:00:14.032418
License: Public Domain

HLD-176 (August 2011)                                           NOT PRECEDENTIAL

                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                             FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                       No. 11-3055
                                       ___________

                       IN RE: GEORGE P. JOHNSON, Petitioner
                       ____________________________________

                      On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
                 United States District Court for the District of Delaware
                      (Related to D. Del. Civ. No. 1-09-cv-00619)
                      ____________________________________

                      Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
                                    August 25, 2011

          Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges

                               (Opinion filed: July 23, 2012)
                                        _________

                                        OPINION
                                        _________

PER CURIAM

       George P. Johnson filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct

the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The District Court has since ruled on Johnson’s § 2254 petition. In light of the District

Court’s action, the question Johnson presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will

deny his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964,

974 (3d Cir. 1992).