Court Opinion

ID: 6331193
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-13 19:10:50.160108+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:09.806784
License: Public Domain

People v Milo (2022 NY Slip Op 02286)

People v Milo

2022 NY Slip Op 02286

Decided on April 6, 2022

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 6, 2022
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

2021-03345
 (Ind. No. 1336/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vAnthony Milo, appellant. 

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Avshalom Yotam, and Andrew S. Ayala of counsel), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane C. Tully, J.), imposed April 14, 2021, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DUFFY, J.P., IANNACCI, MALTESE and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court