Court Opinion

ID: 5233379
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 17:02:51.965938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:42.043909
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:
The judgment should be reversed. It was erroneous to permit the jury to infer wrongful possession by the defendant from his allegation of title to the goods in the answer. The finding of conversion is against the weight of the evidence. Nothing came of the arrangement considered by Edwards and M. D. Chapman. Edwards left the hotel and goods in the possession of Coffey, who forthwith conducted the hotel under lease from the Elverton Hotel Company. Privity between defendant and Coffey is not sufficiently shown. The evidence of the value of the goods is given by one who knew nothing of their quality or condition from personal observation or from evidence given on the trial and used hypothetically. But the grounds of objection do not cover such disqualification. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgmentand order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.