Court Opinion

ID: 9686094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:27:28.249694+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:14.800155
License: Public Domain

Hannon, Judge,
concurring.
I write separately to concur with the majority’s opinion because it seems to me the opinion implies that the “general verdict” rule, or the “two issue” rule, is the law of the State of Nebraska. I do not believe it is or that it should be. However, in view of the fact that Lahm successfully resisted BNRR’s request for a special verdict form on the statute of limitations issue, I do not believe Lahm should now be able to take advantage of the confusion that her own actions created, particularly in view of the fact that the statute of limitations issue is a completely separate issue which should have been submitted under a separate verdict. Therefore, I concur.