Court Opinion

ID: 2661911
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-04-03 11:29:21.58796+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:34:07.347123
License: Public Domain

FILED

AUG 30 2012
  c%'.'.’§l§ l‘.,'?ih‘§'%‘»’s‘§l,l §?'é'§'lll’§§¥a
Mohsen Khoshmood, )
Plaintiff, §
v. § civil A¢uon No. /,;>~/z/§ 7
Mohsen M. Khoshmood, §
Defendant. l
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(e), the Court is
required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous.
28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2)(B)(i).

Given the complaint’s caption, plaintiff appears to be suing himself.l The "Complaint"
consists of an "Affldavit of Equitable lnterest" that is wholly incomprehensible and unexplained
attachments. Complaints that lack "an arguable basis in law and fact" are subject to dismissal as
frivolous. Brcmdon v. Distrz`ct of Columbia Ba’. of Parole, 734 F.Zd 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see
Crisa/”z v. Hollana’, 655 F.Zd 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. l98l) ("A court may dismiss as frivolous

complaints reciting bare legal conclusions with no suggestion of supporting facts, or postulating

According to the Clerk, plaintiff and other individuals similarly situated have repeatedly
appeared in the Clerk’s Office and demanded that their deficient complaints be filed. As it did
with at least two other such submissions, the Court will allow this action to be filed to resolve
this matter once and for all. See Perez v. Perez, Civ. No. 12-1207 (UNA) (D.D.C. July, 23,
2012); Thornas v. Thomas, Civ. No. 12-12()8 (UNA) (D.D.C. July 23, 2012).

l

»»~.-¢¢~.»~»»u~»~i.»-.»,v»¢.»,»..,l... w - t ..» t .,»,,.W .. __ ,_. ..,c. … ,

events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind."). The instant complaint satisfies the

foregoing standard. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

United States District Judge {

Date:August 21 ,2012