Court Opinion

ID: 991972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:45:08.156539+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:49.776536
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 96-7085

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

RONNIE RAY NEWTON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-91-180-N, CA-96-429-2)

Submitted:   April 17, 1997                 Decided:   April 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Ray Newton, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Newton, No. CR-91-180-N; CA-96-429-2
(E.D. Va. June 18, 1996). Appellant's motion to place this case in

abeyance is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2