Court Opinion

ID: 2836084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-02 20:35:32.539112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:55.030817
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued July 24, 2003

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________

NO. 01-02-01275-CR
____________

HERBERT LEE MYRES, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 02CR0232

 
MEMORANDUM  OPINION
               Appellant, Herbert Lee Myres, Jr., pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery to
a jury.  After hearing the evidence, the jury assessed punishment at confinement for
12 years.  We affirm.
               Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the appeal
is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a
professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds of error to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
1992, pet. ref’d).
               The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, whom counsel
advised by letter of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. 
See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  More than 30
days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief.  We have carefully
reviewed the record and counsel’s brief.  We find no reversible error in the record,
and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous.
               We affirm the judgment.

                                                     PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Hanks.
Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).