Court Opinion

ID: 5131223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-03 01:00:35.332171+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:54.442526
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-10450       Document: 00516115635            Page: 1      Date Filed: 12/02/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                      United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                                                                     FILED
                                                                              December 2, 2021
                                     No. 21-10450                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                   Summary Calendar                                  Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                                   Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                           versus

   Robert Harris, Jr.,

                                                               Defendant—Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 4:20-CR-339-17

   Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*

          The attorney appointed to represent Robert Harris, Jr., has moved to
   withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
   and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has not filed
   a response.

          *
              Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin-
   ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
   set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-10450    Document: 00516115635          Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/02/2021

                                  No. 21-10450

         We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.
   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-
   lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2