Court Opinion

ID: 998524
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:12:10.226918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:09.040422
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ROBERT G. WRIGHT,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-89-113-R)

Submitted:   March 2, 1999                 Decided:   April 19, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Robert G. Wright appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for return of property as untimely.    We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Wright, No. CR-89-113-R (W.D. Va. Nov.

23, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2