Court Opinion

ID: 8436680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 15:39:19.947641+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:43.670942
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Emram, No. 1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD, *8782010 WL 2490965 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.