Court Opinion

ID: 3078710
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:38:39.971651+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:03:51.456017
License: Public Domain

In The

                                 Court of Appeals
                     Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                             ____________________
                                 NO. 09-12-00117-CR
                             ____________________

   KIMBERLY ANN PETRY A/K/A KIMBERLY BREED A/K/A KIMBERLY
  COMEAUX A/K/A KIMBERLY SLAUGHTER A/K/A KIMBERLY THOMAS
  A/K/A SAM HAZEL A/K/A KIMBERLY ANN THOMAS A/K/A KIMBERLY
             ANN BREED A/K/A KIM COMEAUX, Appellant

                                           V.

                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________                ______________

                  On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
                          Jefferson County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. 10-09122
________________________________________________________                _____________

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to felony theft. The trial court

found her guilty, assessed punishment at ten years of confinement, suspended the

imposition of sentence, and placed her on community supervision for ten years, and

imposed a $1,000.00 fine. After the State filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found

appellant violated terms of her community supervision, revoked the supervision, and

sentenced her to ten years of confinement. Appellate counsel filed a brief that presents

                                           1
counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable

points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493

(1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an

extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from

the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s

conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal.

Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial

court’s judgment is affirmed.

      AFFIRMED.

                                               ________________________________
                                                       DAVID GAULTNEY
                                                             Justice

Submitted on December 28, 2012
Opinion Delivered January 23, 2013
Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

                                           2