Court Opinion

ID: 3097171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:43:03.994995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:25:14.147928
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-11-00456-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER KEITH SCHMOTZER,                                                 Appellant,

                                            v.

ROBYN MICHELLE SCHMOTZER,                           Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On appeal from the 85th District Court
                   of Brazos County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
            Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
       The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on December 13, 2011. On

January 11, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response

has been received from appellant.

       Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                                                       PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
8th day of March, 2012.

                                             2