Court Opinion

ID: 998020
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:05:22.045415+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:07.342820
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7607

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARK ANTHONY WALTERS,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-95-193, CA-97-1346-1)

Submitted:   February 25, 1999            Decided:   March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Walters, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Mark Anthony Walters seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.   See United States v. Walters, Nos. CR-95-

193; CA-97-1346-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1998). In light of this dispo-

sition, we deny Walters’ motion for bail pending appeal.    We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2