Court Opinion

ID: 3968303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:27:32.778428+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:57.795570
License: Public Domain

The offense, cattle theft; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
Appellant's motion for new trial in this case was overruled on November 6, 1931, and at this time notice of appeal was given, at which time appellant was allowed 50 days in which to prepare and file a statement of facts and bills of exception. The statement of facts was not filed in the trial court until February 23, 1932, which was 109 days after notice of appeal had been given. On the 28th day of December, 1931, the trial court made an order extending the time in which to file a statement of facts and bills of exception and allowed 90 days from the date of adjournment of court on December 5, 1931. The statement of facts was filed within 90 days from the adjournment of court. The time for filing bills of exception and statement of facts may not be extended by the trial court beyond the 90-day period provided by statute. Article 760, C. C. P.; Tillar v. State, 111 Tex.Crim. Rep.,13 S.W.2d 368. So far as the court's order gave 90 days from adjournment had the effect of extending the time beyond that permitted by law, it was unauthorized. Simpson v. State, 110 Tex. Crim. 399,10 S.W.2d 567, and cases therein cited; Finley v. State, 115 Tex.Crim. Rep., 29 S.W.2d 346. The statement of facts was filed too late to be entitled to consideration by this court. See Simmons v. State,116 Tex. Crim. 68, 28 S.W.2d 1084; Steelman v. State,106 Tex. Crim. 214, 291 S.W. 549. We also note that the statement of facts does not show to have been approved by the trial judge.
No bills of exception appear in the record. Other complaints are made in appellant's brief of the overruling of a motion for a continuance and also overruling appellant's application for a change of venue. These are not brought forward by bills of exception and cannot be considered in the absence of bills of exception.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has ben examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
                    ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.