Court Opinion

ID: 8439169
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:15:04.666059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:46.958299
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Xian Yong Sun, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Rostomian v. INS, 210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. Because petitioner was detained only once after protesting with 40 other individuals at the mayor’s office, and did not claim physical injury, and there is no other evidence to establish persecution, petitioner’s asylum claim fails. See Al-Saher v. INS, 268 F.3d 1143, 1145-46 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that detention where alien was not physically harmed did not compel the conclusion that alien suffered past persecution); see also Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that alien did not establish past persecution based on religion where she was fired from her job and was harassed, but was never physically harmed).
Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he is eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Singhr-Kour v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999).
PETITION DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.