Court Opinion

ID: 1033639
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-13 00:01:02.01973+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:41.850563
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUL 12 2013

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-50330

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00204-DDP

  v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
DAVID JOHN AREVALO, a.k.a. FNU
LNU,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Central District of California
                    Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

                              Submitted June 18, 2013 **

Before:        TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

       David John Arevalo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and six-month sentence for making a false

statement in a passport application and use thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1542. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Arevalo’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Arevalo the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

      AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                     12-50330