Court Opinion

ID: 3123572
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:41:31.645802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:29:10.412221
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                         No. 04-12-00542-CR

                                          Ricky CAVAZOS,
                                              Appellant

                                                  v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 2012CR5842
                          Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
                  Rebecca Simmons, Justice
                  Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 24, 2012

DISMISSED

           On September 12, 2012, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before October 12, 2012. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not respond. The record does not contain a certification

that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the
                                                                                      04-12-00542-CR

record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant;

therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

                                                      PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                -2-