Court Opinion

ID: 223219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-16 00:01:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:06:52.460563
License: Public Domain

FILED
                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              AUG 15 2011

                                                                         MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 09-30376

               Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00033-SEH

  v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
JASON X. DENNIS,

               Defendant - Appellant.

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the District of Montana
                     Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted August 11, 2011 **

Before:        THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

       Jason X. Dennis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month

sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in a public housing facility

and distribution of cocaine in a public housing facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 860. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Dennis’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with

a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

      Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

      Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

                                           2                                    09-30376