Court Opinion

ID: 4352543
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-12-20 07:38:43.331749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:43:14.340567
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-88,988-01

                    EX PARTE AMBER VALANTINA AKERS, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                CAUSE NO. 11-12331-A IN THE 252ND DISTRICT COURT
                           FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            OPINION

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed her

conviction. Akers v. State, No. 14-12-00422-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 2013) (not

designated for publication).

        Applicant contends, among other things, that she was denied her right to petition this Court

for discretionary review. Applicant’s appellate attorney filed a petition on her behalf, but that

petition was struck by this Court because there were insufficient copies filed, in violation of Rule
                                                                                                      2

9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. This Court allowed 30 days to re-draw and re-file

the petition, but no re-drawn petition was ever filed.

        We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has

entered findings of fact and conclusions of law finding that appellate counsel never received notice

of this Court’s order striking the petition. The trial court concludes that because of a breakdown in

the system, Applicant was deprived of her right to petition this Court for discretionary review

through no fault of her own. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. See Ex parte Riley,

193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

       We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-12-

00422-CR that affirmed her conviction in Cause No. 11-12331-A from the 252nd District Court of

Jefferson County. Applicant shall file her petition for discretionary review with this Court within

30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

       Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: December 19, 2018
Do not publish