Court Opinion

ID: 3108478
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:20:54.918474+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:26:39.863794
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-10-00634-CV
 
                                 COURT
OF APPEALS
 
                     THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                         CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
CLAYTON DIRECTIONAL
DRILLING, LTD.,                         APPELLANT,
 
                                                             v.
 
SANTIAGO A. GUAJARDO,                                                        APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________
 
                      On
Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
                                        of
Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
 
                               MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
                            Before
Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion
Per Curiam
 

Appellant,
Clayton Directional Drilling, Ltd., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered
by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-62659-4. 
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties
have settled the case.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The
Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that
the motion should be granted.  See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and
the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the
appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
and our mandate will issue forthwith.
 
PER
CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
3rd day of February, 2011.