Court Opinion

ID: 5957224
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 06:42:54.500004+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:59.696300
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Gail A. Donofrio, J.), entered April 11, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5. The order denied the objections of petitioner to the order of the Support Magistrate.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings on the petition.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act, petitioner appeals from an order denying its objections to the order of the Support Magistrate. We conclude that Family Court erred in determining that it lacked personal jurisdiction over respondent because the affidavit of service did not include the last name of the person of “suitable age and discretion” who was served with process (§ 525 [a]; see Dunn v Pallett, 42 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2007]; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Evans, 170 AD2d 225, 227-228 [1991]; Plycon Transp. Group, LLC v Kirschenbaum, 36 Misc 3d 1232[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51576[U], *3-5 [2012]; see also CPLR 308 [2]). We further conclude that in any event the court erred in sua sponte dismissing the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction (see Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v Lee, 41 AD3d 183, 183-184 [2007]). We therefore reverse the order and reinstate the petition, and we remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings thereon. Present — Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.