Court Opinion

ID: 998308
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:09:09.283515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:34.348539
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 99-6026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MIGUEL PORQUIN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-94-40)

Submitted:   March 25, 1999                 Decided:   March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miguel Porquin, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Miguel Porquin appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to file an appeal out of time which it considered as a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994).   We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court.   See United States

v. Porquin, No. CR-94-40 (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 1998).     We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2