Court Opinion

ID: 4287154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-22 13:00:32.92059+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:47:02.037664
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10899      Document: 00514523752        Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/21/2018

          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                   No. 17-10899                              June 21, 2018
                                 Summary Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ZACHARY WHITESIDE,
 Also Known as Sharkey, Also Known as Shark, Also Known as Zach,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 3:15-CR-307-17

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      The attorney appointed to represent Zachary Whiteside has moved for

      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10899    Document: 00514523752     Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/21/2018

                                 No. 17-10899

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Whiteside has not filed a response.

      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2