Court Opinion

ID: 6528945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 19:59:10.444534+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:18.116872
License: Public Domain

By Mr. Chief Justice Lipscomb :
The plaintiff sued the, defendant before a justice of the peace for Limestone county, and obtained judgment. The defendant appealed to the County Court, where he pleaded, that at the time he was sued, he was a resident and freeholder in the county of Lauderdale. The plaintiff' replied, that the defendant had waived his residence in another county, *130and consented to be sued in the county of Limestone. -The defendant demurred to this replication, and the demurrer was sustained by the court.
The matter in controversy was under twenty dollars, and was not therefore subject to the technical rules of pleading. All such matters of defence should be set up by proof. It appears from the record before us, that this defence was not made before the justice of the peace ; on the contrary, that the judgment was rendered by consent. It was certainly competent for the defendant when sued out of the county of his residence, to waive the objection ; and if he did so before the justice of the peace, he will not be permitted to set up the defence on an appeal to the Circuit or County Court. In this case, we infer from the record, that the objection was waived by the defendant before the justice of the peace.
The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, and remanded.