Court Opinion

ID: 1004466
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:41:37.32527+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:32.916575
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Roger DeWitt Prince appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See United States v. Prince,
  
  No. CR-96-122 (D.S.C. July 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.