Court Opinion

ID: 9831391
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:02:54.85199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:34.204756
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
At a previous day of this term of court this cause was reversed, with instructions to the trial court, when the case is again called for trial, to render judgment for the defendants Nixon and Daniel and for the plaintiff against Sheridan Williams. Sheridan Williams and the appellee have filed motions for rehearing. Appellant’s motion is overruled.
The motion of the appellee, asking that the judgment of reversal as to Sheridan Williams be set aside and the case affirmed as to him, is granted. It appears from an inspection of the judgment that the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against Sheridan Williams for $953.50, and also rendered judgment’ against Sheridan Williams and Russ Daniel, jointly, for $760.-50. The judgment of the trial court in favor of W. H. Davenport against Sheridan Williams, in the sum of $953.50, is in all things affirmed. The judgment of the -trial court in favor of Russ Daniel and Sheridan Williams for $760.50, in so far as it affects Russ Daniel, is reversed and rendered in his favor', and as the liability of Sheridan Williams on the $760.50 is the same item covered by the $953.50, the plaintiff is protected in all his damages in affirming the judgment rendered against Sheridan Williams. The action of the court in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant Nixon is affirmed.
The costs of this appeal are taxed one-half against the appellant, Sheridan Williams, and one-half against the appellee, W. H. Davenport.