Court Opinion

ID: 2922061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 02:51:53.972377+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:09.097593
License: Public Domain

NUMBER
13-05-612-CV
 
                         COURT
OF APPEALS
 
               THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
 
                  CORPUS
CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
 
RICARDO GARCIA GONZALEZ AND 
ROSALINDA GARCIA,                                             Appellants,
 
                                           v.
 
CARLOS MORAN D/B/A MORAN CONSTRUCTION CO.,   Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
 
                  On
appeal from the 404th District Court 
                           of
Cameron County, Texas
___________________________________________________________________
 
                     MEMORANDUM
OPINION
 
              Before
Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza
                       Memorandum
Opinion Per Curiam
 

Appellants, RICARDO GARCIA GONZALEZ AND ROSALINDA GARCIA,
attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th
District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2003-04-2042-G.  Judgment in
this cause was signed on June 16, 2005.  A timely motion for new trial was filed.  Pursuant to Tex.
R. App. P. 26.1, appellants= notice of appeal was
due on September 14, 2005, but was not filed until September
15, 2005.  
Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to
correct the defect, if it could be done. 
Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten
days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  Appellants= response was received and filed on October 17,
2005.  In their response, appellants
state that the appeal in this cause will not be perfected.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellants= failure to timely
perfect their appeal, and appellants= response to this
Court=s notice, is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion
delivered and filed 
this the 10th
day of November, 2005.