Court Opinion

ID: 995174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:33:32.376449+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:49.915262
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6431

CARLTON AUR,

                                            Petitioner - Appellant,

         versus

MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION,

                                             Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-
3635-L)

Submitted:     May 14, 1998                  Decided:   June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Aur, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Aur v. Maryland Parole Comm'n, No. CA-97-3635-L (D.
Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2