Court Opinion

ID: 4288323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-06-26 13:09:26.019045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:38.133579
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 June 06, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1617, A18A1618. DAMIAN DIXON v. EVERLYN DIXON (two cases).

      Damian Nixon filed a motion to reopen judgment under the Servicemembers
Civil Relief Act, 50 USC § 3901 et seq., after the trial court entered a final decree of
divorce awarding his wife child custody, child support, spousal support, attorney’s
fees, and an equitable division of marital property. The trial court denied his motion
to reopen and Damian Nixon filed a notice of appeal on January 12, 2017. On January
10, 2018, the trial court dismissed his appeal under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c) due to his
unreasonable delay in filing a transcript. Case No. A18A1617 stems from the trial
court’s dismissal of the appeal, and Case No. A18A1618 is the appeal from the trial
court’s denial of his motion to reopen. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
      Regarding Case No. A18A1618, generally appeals from orders in domestic
relations cases must be pursued by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)
(2). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe
v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Although OCGA § 5-6-34
(a) (11) permits a direct appeal from all judgments or orders in “child custody cases,”
the issue raised on appeal governs whether a custody order may be appealed directly,
and here the issue is not custody but whether the trial court properly denied the motion
to reopen. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017) (appeal from
an order denying motion to set aside did not raise a custody issue on appeal). Damian
Nixon’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction
over Case No. A18A1618, which is hereby DISMISSED.
      Regarding Case No. A18A1617, a trial court’s order dismissing an appeal is
directly appealable if the judgment being appealed from is itself directly appealable.
Kappelmeier v. Household Realty Corp., 276 Ga. App. 575, 576 (1) (623 SE2d 752)
(2005). As noted above, Damian Nixon’s appeal from the trial court’s denial of his
motion to reopen was not directly appealable. Accordingly, his appeal in Case No.
A18A1617 from the trial court’s order dismissing his appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                     Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                             Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                       06/06/2018
                                             I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                     the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                             Wi tness my signature and the seal of said court
                                     hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.