Court Opinion

ID: 9470181
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 02:58:44.198908+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:41:46.139199
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
PER CURIAM:
In denying the Petition for Rehearing in the above-captioned cases, this Court would point out that it in no way utilized or relied upon the in camera materials submitted to the District Court (See, 697 F.2d at 1238 and note 15) for a determination that defendants Grant, Greene and May were prosecuted as strike leaders rather than as union officials. Having failed to find evidence in the record sufficient to make out a prima facie case of selective prosecution, this Court examined the in camera materials in an attempt to discover if they contained any information which might indicate prosecution on some impermissible ground. Finding none, we affirmed the judgment of the District Court.
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.