Court Opinion

ID: 9402094
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-06-15 08:09:48.558094+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:57.347675
License: Public Domain

In The
                                   Court of Appeals
                          Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                          No. 07-23-00145-CR

                        CHARLES ANDREW CAMARILLO, APPELLANT

                                                      V.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                              On Appeal from the 428th District Court
                                        Hays County, Texas1
                    Trial Court No. CR-21-5594-D, Honorable Joe Pool, Presiding

                                             June 13, 2023
                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
                          Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

        Appellant, Charles Andrew Camarillo, was convicted of burglary of a habitation2

and, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, sentenced to twenty-five years’ confinement.

The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain

case from which Appellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right

       1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.

        2   See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(c)(2).
of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court. Notwithstanding

the certification, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his conviction.

       We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of

the record.” By letter of May 16, 2023, we notified Appellant of the consequences of the

trial court’s certification and directed him to file a response demonstrating grounds for

continuing the appeal by May 26. To date, Appellant has not filed a response or had any

further communication with this Court.

       Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

                                                         Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              2