Court Opinion

ID: 7780959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:12:27.50743+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:12.648182
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Jenkins v. State, 872 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (To prevail on a motion to continue based upon witness unavailability, the moving party must show: (1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness’ presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would be forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.).
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.