Court Opinion

ID: 7745172
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:09:05.443788+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:35.198091
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), because it was untimely. While we conclude it was timely under Wood, we nevertheless affirm because the motion was legally insufficient. See State v. Perry, 786 So.2d 554 (Fla.2001); Bartz v. State, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), rev. denied, 767 So.2d 453 (Fla.2000), and rev. denied, 767 So.2d 461 (Fla.2000).
GUNTHER, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.