Court Opinion

ID: 8676130
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 02:11:37.876977+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:25.067437
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Y. Culp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying *46relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Culp v. Doctor Alewine, No. 5:13-cv-01342-JFA, 2014 WL 3499224 (D.S.C. July 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.