Court Opinion

ID: 4315503
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-09-26 15:10:05.935334+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:44:53.106456
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                        ATLANTA,____________________
                                                 September 06, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0096. GREENE COUNTY, GEORGIA v. CITY OF UNION POINT.

      This dispute between Greene County (the “County”) and the City of Union
Point (the “City”) arises out of the Service Delivery Strategy Act (the “Act”), OCGA
§ 36-70-20 et seq. In a March 2017 order, the trial court concluded that the Act’s
evidentiary hearing process is unconstitutional and that sovereign immunity barred
several of the City’s claims that are not otherwise provided for in the Act. An appeal
was taken to the Supreme Court, which: (i) affirmed the trial court’s ruling on
sovereign immunity; (ii) reversed the trial court’s ruling on the constitutionality of
the Act’s hearing process; and (iii) concluded that some of the remedies granted by
the trial court exceeded those available under the Act. City of Union Point v. Greene
County, 303 Ga. 449, 449 (812 SE2d 278) (2018). On that basis, the Supreme Court
affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case to the trial
court “for entry of an appropriate order.” Id.
      On remand, the trial court issued an “Order on Remittitur” in which it: (i) ruled
that the parties may resume settlement discussions with respect to several remaining
open issues under the Act; (ii) ordered the parties to restart the Act’s mandatory
mediation process with respect to a dispute as to the funding of maintenance for roads
and bridges; and (iii) ordered the Clerk of Superior Court to continue to hold a $7,500
bond previously posted by the City. After the trial court denied the County’s request
for a certificate of immediate review, the County filed this direct appeal. We lack
jurisdiction.
      The order that the County seeks to appeal is not final, as this action remains
pending before the trial court. Consequently, the County was required to use the
interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate
review from the trial court – to appeal the “Order on Remittitur.” See OCGA
§ 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). The
County’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bailey v.
Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).
      To the extent that the County seeks review of the trial court’s denial of a
certificate of immediate review, that is not an appealable ruling. See Price v. State,
237 Ga. 352, 352-353 (2) (227 SE2d 368) (1976). Absent a timely certificate of
immediate review, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED. See Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833; Boyd, 191 Ga. App. at 435.

                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        09/06/2018
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.