Court Opinion

ID: 4177711
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-06-15 15:03:51.653027+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:07.272290
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 16-4218
                    ___________________________

                         Arkansas Warehouse, Inc.

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                        v.

                  Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                  ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
              for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
                              ____________

                          Submitted: June 12, 2017
                            Filed: June 15, 2017
                               [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.
      In this diversity action for unjust enrichment, Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. appeals
the district court’s1 grant of for summary judgment to defendant-appellee Saint-
Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.

       After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th
Cir. 2006), we conclude that the district court’s disposition of the cross-motions for
summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated its opinion and order.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                         ______________________________

      1
      The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-