Court Opinion

ID: 8452332
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:00:36.962467+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:00.772087
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tiayon Kardell Evans appeals the district court’s order denying a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Evans’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Evans has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.