Court Opinion

ID: 4578795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-10-20 21:07:58.581801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:41:28.106743
License: Public Domain

People v Pena (2020 NY Slip Op 05865)

People v Pena

2020 NY Slip Op 05865

Decided on October 20, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 20, 2020

Before: Kapnick, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ. 

Ind No. 5269N/14 Appeal No. 12106 Case No. 2018-1715 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vManuel Pena Also Known as Estalin Batista, Defendant-Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), rendered September 7, 2016,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 20, 2020
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.