Court Opinion

ID: 9833279
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:34:50.087857+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:01.152672
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
Appellant has. filed a lengthy, motion for rehearing, with copious quotation from various decisions. In our opinion the motion presents nothing new.
The authorities quoted are upon different state of facts, and do not involve any question arising upon conflict of laws affecting the validity vel non of the insurance contracts. They have no application to the present action.
There is but one matter in the motion to which we desire to refer, namely: The assertion that the policies, in case of loss, were performable by appellant and payable at its domicile (Galveston, Tex.); hence the contracts governed by the laws of Texas.
Upon the original consideration of this case, the policies were examined to ascertain if such place of payment was designated, for, if losses were payable in Texas, such feature would have had some bearing upon the controlling question in the case. The contracts do not provide where losses shall be payable by appellant. As to that they are silent.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.