Court Opinion

ID: 1008163
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:36:03.690049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:42.926470
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-7863

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DION KINTE BARTLETT,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CR-00-5, CA-01-27-4)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Kinte Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dion Kinte Bartlett seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-27-

4 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).         We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2