Court Opinion

ID: 1005269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:54:13.868746+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:22:13.405492
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  William B. Crews appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his motion styled “pro se motion based on the district court’s lack of jurisdiction to convict and/or sentence ‘defendant William Bernard Crews’ and in alternative a pro se motion for jail credit time for the federal sentence that was spent in a state prison.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   United States v. Crews,
  
  No. CR-89-284 (N.D.W.Va. May 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.