Court Opinion

ID: 9665676
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:54:39.367734+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:17.696984
License: Public Domain

REAVLEY, Justice
(dissenting).
I find nothing in the statute, Tex.Ins. Code art. 5.06-1 (Supp.1973), to prevent Briggs and American Motorists Insurance Company from contracting to provide that *237the $10,000 uninsured motorist coverage is secondary or excess coverage to another policy’s uninsured motorist coverage of the first $10,000 of damages. Nor do I see that the holding in Ranzau requires this result. I would sustain the contentions of American Motorists Insurance Company.
WALKER, J., joins in this dissent.