Court Opinion

ID: 8598318
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 16:07:23.466099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:04.178882
License: Public Domain

JUDGMENT ORDER
DiCarlo, Senior Judge:
The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermination in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Carnation Enterprises Ltd., etal. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91-11-00826. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Re-determination of the 1989 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The new *215company-specific and all other rates applicable to the 1989 period of review are as follows:
Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 16.10%
UMA Iron & Steel Co. 16.22%
Govind Steel 20.36%
Tirupati 20.36%
Ragunath Prasad Phoolchand 20.36%
All Others 2.50%
These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.
The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the new rates, it is hereby
Ordered that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further
Ordered that the rates listed above shall become the new rates for the 1989 period, and it is further
Ordered that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.