Court Opinion

ID: 4494483
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-01-23 17:07:12.494214+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:11.748623
License: Public Domain

People v Panzano (2020 NY Slip Op 00493)

People v Panzano

2020 NY Slip Op 00493

Decided on January 23, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 23, 2020

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kern, Oing, González, JJ.

10845 2413/16 1140/17 4156/16

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vAlan Panzano, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Vang of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered May 1, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JANUARY 23, 2020
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.