Court Opinion

ID: 67282
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 06:19:51+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:53.794612
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  The parties agree that the sentence should be vacated and remanded for resen-tencing, because some necessary documents were not provided to the district court for consideration with regard to pri-
   
   *312
   
  or convictions. They have filed a joint motion for remand and resentencing.
 

  The sentence is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED for resentencing. As agreed, the defendant preserves, for any appeal after remand, his second issue on appeal, regarding the admission of trial testimony.
 

  The government’s alternative motion to extend the time to file its brief is DENIED as unnecessary.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.