Court Opinion

ID: 8030022
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 03:03:53.816509+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:56.422822
License: Public Domain

On January 10, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, with two (2) years suspended, to run consecutive to the sentence imposed in Cause No. DC-98-14, for violations of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Attempted Escape, a felony.
On May 5, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Lyle Panasuk. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
*58DATED this 26th day of May, 2006.
Done in open Court this 5th day of May, 2006.
Chairperson, Hon. John W. Whelan, Member, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding and Alt. Member, Hon. Kurt Krueger.