Court Opinion

ID: 9537983
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 07:28:07.880909+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:15.147891
License: Public Domain

PARKS, Presiding Judge,
specially concurring.
I agree with the majority that the conviction should be reversed for the reasons stated. However, I would also reverse appellant’s conviction based on his first proposition of error wherein he claims that the trial judge abused his discretion by rejecting the jury’s request to rehear appellant's *143testimony after sustaining a like request to rehear testimony of a witness representing the prosecution. This clearly emphasized that portion of the State’s case. See Givens v. State, 705 P.2d 1139, 1141 (Okl.Crim.App.1985).