Court Opinion

ID: 8462790
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 07:35:34.404121+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:10.717988
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Elvis Joseph Amarame seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss Amarame’s complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Amarame seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.