Court Opinion

ID: 9719541
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 07:55:37.895635+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:36.412565
License: Public Domain

THE COURT.
Defendants’ petition for rehearing points out that our opinion omits mention of the trial court’s finding that, shortly before the merger of Cal-Camellia into Gilmedco, “[p]laintiff, in writing, consented to the .assignment and to the transfer by operation of law of the Woodland lease to Gilmedco, and represented that the lease had not been modified since its execution on August 1, 1968.”
The omission was no oversight. The finding in question is not material to any issue on this appeal. It was not a finding that plaintiff represented that the written lease, when executed (signed), conformed with the actual agreement of its signatories.
Respondents’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied Januaiy 29, 1975. Richardson, J., did not participate therein.