Court Opinion

ID: 4568153
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-09-22 22:32:34.18833+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:11.467842
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                       No. 20-6689

DEVONTAY D. MYLES,

                     Plaintiff - Appellant,

              v.

HARNETT COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; WAYNE COATS, Sheriff;
JULIE PLANKO, Nurse; HOLLI JENKINS, Nurse; CORPORAL CIPRIANO;
SGT. SELVY; RANDY TAYLOR, Corporal; TRAVELERS CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

                     Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03097-D)

Submitted: July 21, 2020                                          Decided: July 24, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devontay D. Myles, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Devontay D. Myles seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

       In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

       The district court entered its order on May 28, 2019. On March 10, 2020, Myles

wrote the court to advise that he had just received a copy of the dismissal order. See

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (establishing prison mailbox rule). The court

construed this letter as a motion to reopen the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(6) and granted

the motion. Myles noted his appeal within the 14 days accorded to him.

       A district court may reopen the appeal period for 14 days only if: (1) the movant did

not receive notice of the order he seeks to appeal within 21 days after entry; (2) the movant

files the motion within 180 days after entry of the order or within 14 days of receiving

notice of the entry, whichever date is earlier; and (3) no party would be prejudiced. Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Here, Myles filed his motion to reopen the appeal period over 180 days

after entry of the order, rendering the motion untimely. Because the timely filing of a

motion to reopen the appeal period is a jurisdictional requirement, see Bowles, 551 U.S. at

                                             2
213, we conclude that the district court was without authority to reopen Myles’ appeal

period and that his notice of appeal is untimely.

       Accordingly, we dismiss Myles’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                             DISMISSED

                                             3