Court Opinion

ID: 9664818
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 00:30:46.817784+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:10.566230
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion on Designation by
Justice CASTILLO.1
Respectfully, I believe the opinion and the dissent meet the requirements to be designated a published opinion under the criteria of rule 47.4. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4. Rule 47.4 states, in pertinent part:
An opinion must be designated a memorandum opinion unless it does any of the following:
(a) establishes a new rule of law, alters or modifies an existing rule, or applies an existing rule to a novel fact situation likely to recur in future cases;
(b) involves issues of constitutional law or other legal issues important to the jurisprudence of Texas;
(c) criticizes existing law; or
(d) resolves an apparent conflict of authority.
Tex.R.App. P. 47.4. (Emphasis added). The majority opinion and the dissent do not meet any of the criteria with respect to designation and, thus, designation as an “opinion” is the exception and not the rule. See id. Because I would designate the opinion as a memorandum opinion, I respectfully disagree with the panel majority with respect to designation. Id. Even so, I am pleased that the parties receive their answer today, under either designation.

. The designation of this opinion is also mandated by the majority’s decision on designation.