Court Opinion

ID: 9497021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-05 16:41:41.856103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:57:57.587033
License: Public Domain

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge,
respecting the denial of rehearing en banc:
The points raised by my colleague in dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc are, in essence, responses to the panel opinion, to which I refer the reader. See Shaliehsabou v. Hebrew Home, 363 F.3d 299 (4th Cir.2004). I see no reason to elaborate further at this late point in time. See, e.g., Jones v. Buchanan, 325 F.3d 520, 538-39 (4th Cir.2003) (Luttig, J., dissenting) (“[T]he formal release of an opinion of law on behalf of the court is the final step in the court’s deliberative process, not the first or merely another along the way toward the final decision.”).