Court Opinion

ID: 7765494
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:44:02.869144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:56.326930
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the court’s order of January 20, 2004, the court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed because the motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal of the order denying appellant’s 3.800(a) motion. See Griffis v. State, 593 *1222So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The appeal is hereby dismissed.
DISMISSED.
BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.