Court Opinion

ID: 697943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:36:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:05.549026
License: Public Domain

57 F.3d 1067NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ricky Lee ROYAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 18, 1995.Decided:  June 16, 1995.

Ricky Lee Royal, Appellant Pro Se.  Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Royal, Nos.  CR-92-70-NN, CA-94-23 (E.D. Va.  Apr. 19, 1994).  We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED