Court Opinion

ID: 8440400
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 17:58:12.073745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:48.286682
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marketta Denise Humes-Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Humes-Jones v. Jamalden, No. 1:10-cv-228-GBL-JFA, 2011 WL 570268 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.