Court Opinion

ID: 9369407
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-08 19:00:39.172173+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:14.837014
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-13953    Document: 40-1     Date Filed: 02/08/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 21-13953
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       WASHINGTON DARIO BAILON GUERRERO,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00152-SCB-AAS-4
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-13953     Document: 40-1     Date Filed: 02/08/2023   Page: 2 of 2

       2                     Opinion of the Court                21-13953

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
             Daniel M. Hernandez, counsel for Washington Dario
       Bailon-Guerrero in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with-
       draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
       pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our inde-
       pendent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assess-
       ment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because inde-
       pendent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
       of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bailon-
       Guerrero’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.