Court Opinion

ID: 7760029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 20:34:55.600722+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:27:50.456809
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of April 22, 2003, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED as premature because the order below, dated March 3, 2003, merely granted a motion to dismiss without entering a judgment of dismissal. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.