Court Opinion

ID: 685984
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:31+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:11.224291
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1468
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.David M. SIMMS, Plaintiff Appellant,v.David SMITH;  Officer Mason;  Officer Chamberlin, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 94-6234.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 29, 1994.Decided Dec. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  James C. Turk, District Judge.  (CA-92-592-R)
David M. Simms, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., William Rundahl Coleman, Mary Christine Maggard, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint, and denying his motions to compel.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion and orders discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Simms v. Smith, No. CA-92-592-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 24, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.