Court Opinion

ID: 9707762
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 02:20:51.528076+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:37.914188
License: Public Domain

KELLY, Judge,
concurring:
I join in the majority opinion. I note, however, that I do not read the majority opinion to adopt, as binding on this Court, any of the specific holdings of the various decisions of our sister states and the federal courts cited as to what may or may not be a public policy of this Commonwealth. Rather, I read the majority opinion to emphasize the importance of clear evidence of the existence of a particular *239public policy, a clear breach of the public policy, and a substantial nexus between the public policy violated and the challenged termination of an employee’s at-will employment.
Neither the existence nor the violation of a public policy were established in this case.