Court Opinion

ID: 1652685
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:02:06.474803+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:15:05.876244
License: Public Domain

291 S.W.3d 377 (2009)
Christopher WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92249.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
September 1, 2009.
Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, Saint Louis, Mo, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, Mo, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for *378 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).