Court Opinion

ID: 657633
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:56:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:45.652607
License: Public Domain

9 F.3d 1544
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Eugene E. CLAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-7119.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 13, 1993.Decided:  November 16, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Eugene E. Clay, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Cathy Ellen Krinick, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Eugene E. Clay, Jr., appeals from the district court's order on reconsideration denying a reduction of Clay's sentence.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Clay, No. CR-92-5-NN (E.D. Va.  Sept. 15 & Oct. 15, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED