Court Opinion

ID: 8027795
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 02:50:26.935755+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:36:52.452539
License: Public Domain

On May 2, 1989, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, Intimidation, ten (10) years;; Count II, Attempted Mitigated Deliberate Homicide, eighteen (18) years plus two (2) years for the use of a dangerous weapon to run consecutively; Counts I and II shall be served concurrently; dangerous designation.
On March 8, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Lois Adams, of the Montana Defender Project and Mark Yeshe, Attorney at Law from Helena. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is based upon Rule 17 of the Sentence Review Division’s Rules, the district court judge is presumed correct.