Court Opinion

ID: 991602
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:39:10.941589+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:48.593824
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                           No. 96-2646

JO ANN REHFUSS,

                                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-96-2825-3-17BC)

Submitted:   February 13, 1997        Decided:     February 25, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jo Ann Rehfuss, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Rehfuss v. South Carolina
Dep't of Social Servs., No. CA-96-2825-3-17BC (D.S.C. Oct. 8,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2