Court Opinion

ID: 1014029
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:10:22.896186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:25.074884
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 04-6755

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID LAMONT BEEKS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-828; CA-04-450-6-20)

Submitted:   July 21, 2004                 Decided:   August 13, 2004

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lamont Beeks, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

          David Lamont Beeks seeks to appeal the district court’s

order summarily dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).   We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Beeks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003).   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                               - 2 -