Court Opinion

ID: 8373340
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-18 02:21:36.219908+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:06.556710
License: Public Domain

Humphrey’s J.
sitting alone (absent Overton, J. who was interested in a similar question). The line run in February, 1784, by public authori*272ty, is the true continental line, and no person can be permitted to dispute it; and I am inclined to think, that the entry under which the defendants claim might legally call for it, before it was actually run, but of this, I am not perfectly clear. It is left with the jury.
Verdict for defendants, and a new trial was, granted, in order that it might be further discussed ex relatione judge Haywood.

Note. Upon a second trial at May term, 1809, before Campbell, J. and Humphreys, J. agreeably to the directions of the court another verdict was found for the defendants. Judge Humprey’s stated on this trial, in addition to what was formerly said, that to construe the entry so as to make it apply to the first line, would be directly contrary to the acts *273of 1783, respecting Military and John Armstrongs lands. These acts forbid the entering of John Armstrongs claims north of the last line, we cannot therefore presume it was intended to be entered there.