Court Opinion

ID: 9951666
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-18 17:12:38.152834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:00.448927
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Davis, 2024-Ohio-999.]

                                     IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                           TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

                                           CLERMONT COUNTY

                                                  :
 STATE OF OHIO,
                                                  :     CASE NO. CA2023-10-070
        Appellee,
                                                  :           DECISION
                                                               3/18/2024
     - vs -                                       :

                                                  :
 JOEL R. DAVIS,
                                                  :
        Appellant.

   CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                        Case No. 2023 CR 0015

Mark J. Tekulve, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Nicholas Horton, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Treleven & Klingensmith, LLC, and John Treleven, for appellant.

        Per Curiam.

        {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Joel R. Davis, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of

proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
                                                                  Clermont CA2023-10-070

       {¶2}   Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of

both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

       {¶3}   Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel

for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

       S. POWELL, P.J., M. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Joel R. Davis, #A819264,
Southeastern Correctional Institution, 5900 BIS Rd SW, Lancaster, OH 43130

                                              -2-
[Cite as State v. Davis, 2024-Ohio-999.]