Court Opinion

ID: 46021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 22:50:42+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:32.697250
License: Public Domain

*294
   
  PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  On consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, this court concludes that under all the circumstances, the district court abused its discretion in entirely denying the Rule 56(f) motion of plaintiff-appellant, who had not been allowed (despite appropriate request) to take
  
   any
  
  deposition, and accordingly the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant-appellee is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
 

  VACATED and REMANDED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.