Court Opinion

ID: 37850
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 19:59:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:37:16.143322
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                                F I L E D
                     IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                March 14, 2005
                              FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                __________________________                          Clerk

                                       No. 04-60379
                                    Summary Calendar
                                __________________________

DWIGHT T SPRINGFIELD,
                                                                      Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HEILIG-MEYERS FURNITURE COMPANY; RICKY SLAUGHTER,

                                                                   Defendants - Appellees.

                 ___________________________________________________

                       Appeal from the United States District Court
                       Northern District of Mississippi, Greenville
                                 (No. 4:02-CV-161-P-D)
                 ___________________________________________________

Before GARZA, DEMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
                 *
PER CURIAM:

         Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals from the district court’s decision granting

summary judgment on his Title VII, intentional torts, negligence and wrongful termination

claims. For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s order, we AFFIRM.

         *
        Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.