Court Opinion

ID: 3097726
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 04:46:31.469542+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:51:26.910997
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-12-00022-CR

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                      CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JOSE MIGUEL VASQUEZ,                                                         Appellant,

                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                 Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 107th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Jose Miguel Vasquez, appeals from a denial of his motion for DNA testing.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
       The record before this court reflects that the trial court signed the order denying motion

for post-conviction DNA testing on November 29, 2011, and that appellant filed his pro se notice

of appeal on January 9, 2012. On January 24, 2012, appellant filed a motion to extend time

to file the notice of appeal.

       An appeal from a denial of a motion for DNA testing is treated in the same manner as

an appeal of any other criminal matter. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.05 (Vernon

Supp. 2005).     Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is

perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day the trial court enters

an appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice

may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files

the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

       Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before December 29,

2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Although the notice of appeal herein was filed within

the fifteen day time period, no such motion for extension of time was filed within the fifteen day

time period. See id. 26.2(a)(2).

                                                2
       This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

       Accordingly, appellant’s motion to extend time to file notice of appeal is DENIED

and the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Any pending motions

are dismissed as moot.

                                                                PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 16th
day of February, 2012.