Court Opinion

ID: 9750554
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 15:07:15.971669+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:12.546320
License: Public Domain

NEWMAN, Associate Judge,
concurring:
I join the court’s opinion but write separately to address one case discussed therein, Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, ante at 106. I joined Judge Mack’s dissent in that case, 443 A.2d at 527-33, contending that the regulation, as construed by this court, was in violation of the statute. I am still of that view. However, I agree with the opinion of the court in this case that the Director of the Department of Employment Services could not qualify a valid rule into oblivion.