Court Opinion

ID: 4151669
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-03-10 04:14:13.518164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:02:59.740141
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-85,267-01

                    EX PARTE DICHELLE MONIQUE KNOX, Applicant

               ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
            CAUSE NO. W199-80215-08-HC IN THE 199TH DISTRICT COURT
                            FROM COLLIN COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. She did not appeal her conviction.

        Applicant initially contended that her sentence was illegal because she was sentenced to a

prison term when she pleaded guilty to a state jail felony. She has since amended her writ

application, adding a claim that counsel at the adjudication proceedings misadvised her as to the

appropriate punishment range, causing her plea of “true” to be involuntary. The habeas court made

findings and recommended granting relief. However, the record contains no evidence suggesting how

Applicant was advised at the time of the adjudication proceedings with respect to the applicable
                                                                                                        2

range of punishment. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte

Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective

assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

        It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,

it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to

Applicant’s claim that counsel erred, causing her plea to be involuntary. The habeas court shall make

specific findings addressing how Applicant was advised with respect to the applicable range of

punishment at the adjudication stage. Should the court find that Applicant was misadvised, it shall

make further findings to determine if this caused Applicant’s plea of “true” to be involuntary. The

trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant

and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

        This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 8, 2017
Do not publish