Court Opinion

ID: 9370385
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-13 11:08:02.818828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:21.356779
License: Public Domain

Opinion issued February 9, 2023

                                        In The

                                Court of Appeals
                                       For The

                           First District of Texas
                             ————————————
                                NO. 01-22-00090-CV
                             ———————————
                           MONA WILSON, Appellant
                                          V.
            GUADALUPE LIZETH LOPEZ GONZALEZ, Appellee

             On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3
                           Harris County, Texas
                       Trial Court Case No. 1155151

                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Appellant, Mona Wilson, has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s

January 5, 2022 judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief).
      The clerk’s record was filed on March 7, 2022, and on March 11, 2022, the

court reporter notified the Court that no reporter’s record was taken in this case.

Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before April 11, 2022. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not file an appellant’s brief.

      On April 13, 2022, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal

was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was

filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of

appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of

prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply

with notice from Clerk of Court). On May 13, 2022, appellant was again notified

that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to

file a brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a),

42.3(b), 42.3(c). Despite the notices that this appeal was subject to dismissal,

appellant did not adequately respond.

      Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

                                   PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

                                           2