Court Opinion

ID: 9894800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-11-03 00:00:35.249223+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:10:46.220997
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10013         Document: 00516954733             Page: 1      Date Filed: 11/02/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                     _____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                      No. 23-10013
                                  consolidated with                                    FILED
                                      No. 23-10015                              November 2, 2023
                                    ____________                                  Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                       Clerk
   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Jesus Elizondo-Martinez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                     Appeals from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC Nos. 3:21-CR-115-1, 3:07-CR-369-1
                     ______________________________

   Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Elizondo-Martinez has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Elizondo-Martinez has not filed a response. We have
   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10013    Document: 00516954733        Page: 2    Date Filed: 11/02/2023

                                    23-10013
                                c/w No. 23-10015

   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2