Court Opinion

ID: 9638257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 15:38:58.183679+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:12.258934
License: Public Domain

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice (dissenting in part). The majority opinion says: “The record reflects that the master heard testimony over an extended period, made a thorough study of the applicable law and. authorities, and prepared a most scholarly and comprehensive report covering more than fifty pages, which he submitted to the Court. ’ ’ I thoroughly agree with the above quoted statement; and I believe that the master’s report was correct and the Chancery Court should have approved it in every detail. Therefore, my conclusion is to reverse so much of the Chancery decree as failed to follow the master’s report, and to reinstate the master’s report m toto.