Court Opinion

ID: 2752814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-11-19 01:00:51.989576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:17:52.162722
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
  
   *
  

  The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court. Understandably, plaintiff faults defendants who were trained in the CPR procedure for not attempting to make the effort to improve Mr. Rodriguez’ breathing when they reached him, but under the circumstances and this record, we cannot say they were consciously indifferent.
 

  AFFIRMED.
 

   *
  

   Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.