Court Opinion

ID: 9783965
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 20:34:22.130155+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:46.201925
License: Public Domain

Maupin, J.,
concurring:
I concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately only to note my view that the majority’s obscure retreat from Tucker v. Action Equipment and Scaffold Co.1 effects no real substantive change in Tucker’s criteria for determining immunity under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act. In fact, the construction versus nonconstruction seemingly remains intact under this analysis. Having made this point, I am in favor of any effort to simplify this historically convoluted area of Nevada law.

 113 Nev. 1349, 951 P.2d 1027 (1997).