Court Opinion

ID: 3938598
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 10:02:45.364023+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:17.513680
License: Public Domain

Appellant brought this suit against appellee for divorce upon the ground of alleged cruel treatment, such as would render their living together as man and wife insupportable. The testimony of the appellant, if believed, showed that she was entitled to divorce. She was corroborated by her mother, and there is nothing in the record to throw suspicion upon the veracity of the latter's testimony. At the conclusion of the evidence in behalf of appellant the court announced that he would not hear any testimony for the defense, but would refuse the divorce.
In such cases it is within the discretion of the court to refuse to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff, but this is a legal discretion and subject to review; and where, as in this case, the testimony is corroborated, and nothing appears to discredit the testimony of the corroborating witness, we do not think that the court could arbitrarily refuse the divorce. It may have been that such action of the court would have been justified had the testimony for the defendant been heard, but it was not.
For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause remanded for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.