Court Opinion

ID: 6043174
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 14:03:13.111243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:51:26.459451
License: Public Domain

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered on July 9, 1998, which granted petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) application challenging respondent Police Department’s denial of access to records pertaining to his arrest and conviction, and directed respondent to deliver the records to petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent argues that the records are exempt from disclosure under Civil Rights Law § 50-b (1) because they identify the victim of a sex offense, and that because petitioner stands convicted of the sex offense on which he was charged, he does not qualify as person “charged” with a sex offense entitled to such records under Civil Rights Law § 50-b (2) (a). We disagree. First, petitioner, who claims to need the documents for purposes of planned proceedings in Federal court to overturn the conviction, is situated much like a person who is charged with a crime and seeks documents for purposes of mounting a defense. Second, the prohibition of Civil Rights Law § 50-b (1) against “public inspection” is inapplicable here; petitioner already knows the victim’s name. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Friedman, JJ.