Court Opinion

ID: 8454064
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 02:51:46.46605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:02.234461
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM *
Dowai argues that the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof on all elements of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon. We reject the argument. Dangerous weapons include objects that are simply used in a manner capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. U.S. v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1057 (9th Cir.1994). The district court found there was strong evidence that the victim suffered extreme physical pain. Dowai argues that expert testimony was required to show that feet are capable of causing severe bodily injury or extreme physical pain. On this record the jury could properly deduce whether Dowai’s shod feet were capable of causing serious bodily injury. See U.S. v. Smith, 520 F.3d 1097, 1106-07 (9th Cir.2008). The record includes sufficient evidence that the victim suffered serious bodily injury and extreme physical pain.
Defendant argues that his 96-month sentence is unreasonable. He claims that the district court placed too much emphasis on the nature of the offense and his criminal history. The record indicates that the district court considered all miti*960gating factors. Nothing more was required. Further, the 96-month sentence was within the middle of the relevant Guidelines range.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.