Court Opinion

ID: 9749959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-28 14:07:47.67043+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:26:00.594173
License: Public Domain

Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno:
The majority opinion says: “No other sidewalk was slippery along the route that plaintiff travelled to the defendants’ brick sidewalk, a distance of 460 feet from her home.” This negatives the assertion in the latter part of the majority opinion that “the entire brick pavement presented an icy condition which obviously was caused by the over-all general icy and slippery condition which existed throughout the Oity immediately prior to the accident.” (Emphasis supplied).
I would grant a new trial.
Mr. Justice Cohen and Mr. Justice Roberts join in this dissent.