Court Opinion

ID: 7822736
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 18:00:00.978787+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:46.584663
License: Public Domain

Darrell Hickman, Justice, dissenting. I welcome the majority’s approach to the appeal and hope it will become a consistent one in taxpayers’ suits and public interest cases. But I join the dissent. There was nothing arbitrary, in the legal sense, in the Arkansas State Medical Board limiting the number of registered nurse practitioners that will be allowed to work under the direction of a physician. After all, it is the physician that will be held accountable and responsible for the actions of the nurse. While the goal of increasing the availability of medical care is an admirable one, we have to look at those ultimately held accountable for that care. That is, of course, the physicians, who are regulated by the Arkansas State Medical Board, a board directly responsible to the legislature and the people for the quality of medical care in Arkansas. When the finger of malpractice is pointed, it is ultimately directed to the physician, the one in charge, the one responsible. It is reasonable for the board to limit the number of nurses any physician can reasonably supervise. One result of the majority decision will be the possibility of medical factories that seek not to serve but to make money. The medical board sought to prevent just such an occurrence as it should have.