Court Opinion

ID: 9884876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-06 03:21:36.770808+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:48:41.863841
License: Public Domain

Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, and McCown, JJ.
We concur in the opinion of Carter, J., except that part which holds that the petition failed to state a cause of action in negligence against the defendant City of Omaha.
We are of the opinion that the allegations contained in the third cause of action of the amended petition were sufficient as against a general demurrer and that the demurrer should have been overruled as to that cause of.action. We are also of the opinion that, under the circumstances in this case, the question of the applicability of the doctrine of governmental immunity should not be: decided upon demurrer, and .that the judgment of the district co-rut should be reversed as to the third cause -of action against the defendant City of Omaha *19and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Per curiam.
. Three judges are of the opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. Four judges are of the opinion that the judgment of the district court-should be affirmed except as to the third cause of action against the defendant City of Omaha.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed except as to the third cause of action against the defendant City of Omaha, and as to that cause of action against that defendant the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Affirmed in part, and in part REVERSED AND REMANDED.