Court Opinion

ID: 9824854
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 11:33:57.321192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:52:45.343494
License: Public Domain

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
We are informed, and the record shows, this case is in all respects identical with the case of Lawrence Franklin v. State, appealed from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court, and here affirmed on June 13, 1939, Ala.App., 191 So. 387.1 These two parties, and another not on trial, were jointly indicted. It appears that the third party had not been apprehended at the time of the trial of this case, and that upon arraignment of this appellant, and the defendant Lawrence Franklin, each demanded, and was granted a severance, as the law provides.
The points of decision here involved are, as stated, identical with the insistences in Lawrence Franklin v. State, supra, and have had the consideration of this court in said case. Therefore the’decision in this case, on appeal, is necessarily controlled by the opinion of this court in the companion case, supra.
Upon authority of the case of Lawrence Franklin v. State, Ala.App., supra, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.
Affirmed.

 Ante, p. 18.