Court Opinion

ID: 9891421
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-18 16:00:41.823904+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.692853
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-12976   Document: 8-1     Date Filed: 10/18/2023   Page: 1 of 3

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-12976
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      TIFFANY ROBIN ROBERTS,
                                                  Petitioner-Appellant,
      versus
      STAFF ATTORNEY 4,
      SCOTT ANDERSON,
      D A,
      GARRICK VICKERY,
      Prosecutor,
      BYRON WILLIAMS,
      Oﬃcer,
      NATE ALLEN,
      Chief, et al.,
USCA11 Case: 23-12976     Document: 8-1      Date Filed: 10/18/2023     Page: 2 of 3

      2                      Opinion of the Court                 23-12976

                                                  Respondents-Appellees.

                           ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                  D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cv-00795-RDP-NAD
                          ____________________

      Before WILSON, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges
      PER CURIAM:
             This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. The statutory time limit required Tiffany Roberts to file a
      notice of appeal on or before July 10, 2023, which was the first busi-
      ness day after the 30-day period following the district court’s June
      9, 2023, denial of her amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60
      motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C).
      However, Roberts did not file her notice of appeal until September
      1, 2023.
             Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
      Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
      ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
      pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
      1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
      appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
      entertain an appeal that is out of time).
USCA11 Case: 23-12976    Document: 8-1     Date Filed: 10/18/2023    Page: 3 of 3

      23-12976              Opinion of the Court                       3

             No petition for rehearing may be ﬁled unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.