Court Opinion

ID: 4325088
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-26 19:00:41.82034+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:28.672253
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 18-6667

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

PRISCILLA LYDIA TURNER,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00133-MR-DLH-1)

Submitted: October 23, 2018                                   Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Priscilla Lydia Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Priscilla Lydia Turner appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to

modify the restitution payments she is required to make through the Bureau of Prisons’

Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues

raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Turner’s informal brief

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Turner has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th

Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our

review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                                              AFFIRMED

                                            2