Court Opinion

ID: 1020753
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 22:55:59.719339+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:56.502541
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 06-6610

VERNON LAMONT HENLEY,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

DAVID BARNES, Doctor,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cv-00663-jlk)

Submitted:   September 29, 2006           Decided:   October 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Lamont Henley, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier,
TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

           Vernon Lamont Henley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.           We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.         Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.             Henley v.

Barnes,   No.   7:05-cv-00663-jlk   (W.D.   Va.   Mar.   24,   2006).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                  AFFIRMED

                                - 2 -