Court Opinion

ID: 8503766
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 01:25:10.056405+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:50:47.737308
License: Public Domain

By the Court.

We are all of opinion, that, the evidence in this case was properly rejected. It was clearly a contract for the sale of land, and not being in writing, no action can be maintained upon it. 2 Starkies, 598—601 ; 5 B. & C. 829, Evans v. Roberts; 5 Cowen, 162, Van Alstine v. Wimple; Newland 182; 3 Vesey, 38, note; 2 Starkies, N. P. C. 379, Thompson v. Wilson; 7 Taunton, 157, Hoby v. Roebuck; 2 Taunton, 38, Emerson v. Heelis; 6 Cowen, 445, Gale v. Nixon.
Judgment on the verdict.