Court Opinion

ID: 9678556
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:23:04.938021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:05.649763
License: Public Domain

Fairchild, J.
(concurring). I agree with the three propositions which, I understand, are fundamental to the decision, as follows:
1. The exclusion from the insurance policy of liability for injuries to a passenger on, or operator of the described motorcycle does not violate the omnibus coverage statute. Sec. 204.30, Stats.
2. Such exclusion does not so arbitrarily or substantially vitiate the protection afforded by the policy as to violate public policy independent of statute.
3. Sec. 344.15 (5), Stats., assuming it to be valid, permits the issuing company to rely upon this exclusion without notifying the motor vehicle commissioner of its intention to do so.