Court Opinion

ID: 9906877
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-05 16:03:06.12815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:54:33.645199
License: Public Domain

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                       Case No. 5D23-853
                  LT Case No. 2021-CF-008542
                 _____________________________

ROBERT GAFFNEY,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________

On Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Meredith Charbula, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R Gossett,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski and
Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney Generals, Tallahassee, for
Appellee.

                        December 5, 2023

PER CURIAM.

     AFFIRMED. See Roughton v. State, 185 So. 3d 1207, 1211 (Fla.
2016) (“We recede from our prior decision in Gibbs [v. State, 698
So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 1997),] and hold that a double jeopardy analysis
must—in accordance with section 775.021(4)[, Florida Statutes]—
be conducted without regard to the accusatory pleading or the
proof adduced at trial, even where an alternative conduct statute
is implicated.”).

EDWARDS, C.J., LAMBERT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________

                               2