Court Opinion

ID: 2931796
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:47:12.724545+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:51.037391
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2006

Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2006.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-06-00297-CR
____________
 
JOHN VICTOR OBREGON,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 263rd Criminal
District Court
 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
1020707
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
Appellant
entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated assault.  On March 28,
2006, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for forty years in the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant
filed a notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro
se response has been filed.
We have
carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed
November 16, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).