Court Opinion

ID: 7684427
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 03:16:56.000707+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:47:37.563429
License: Public Domain

ON RETURN TO REMAND
On remand, in full compliance with our instructions, the circuit judge entered the following order:
 "This case has been returned to this Court by Order of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Petitioner, a convicted felon, has filed a Rule 32 petition. His complaints are as follows:
"1. Ineffective counsel.
 "2. Lack of jurisdiction in the trial court due to absence of an arrest warrant.
 "3. Invalid indictment in that no evidence was presented to the Grand Jury and it fails to state 'knowingly.'
 "This Judge has a SPECIFIC RECOLLECTION of this case (See copy of TRIAL NOTES, made during course of this trial . . .).
 "This Petitioner was represented by one of the most experienced criminal defense lawyers in Lee County. His claim of ineffective representation is baseless and totally without merit. *Page 164
 "The claim of lack of jurisdiction due to absence of an arrest warrant is without merit. This case was tried on an indictment returned by the Grand Jury.
 "The claim that the indictment was defective is without merit. . . .
"This Petition is dismissed!"
The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the appellant's petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED;
AFFIRMED.
All Judges concur. *Page 165 
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 166 
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 551