Court Opinion

ID: 4021708
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-04 00:09:29.788146+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:45:00.747899
License: Public Domain

ORDER
 

  PER CURIAM
 

  AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:
 

  Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to-work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’ Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?