Court Opinion

ID: 3174492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-05 09:07:11.720655+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:51.564674
License: Public Domain

ORDER
  

  PER CURIAM.
 

  AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
 

  Did the Superior Court err in holding, in a published decision, that a warrant was required to obtain blood for a chemical test where the officer had probable cause to believe that the [Respondent] was driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, and [Respondent] did not affirmatively refuse consent?
 

  Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.