Court Opinion

ID: 9890102
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-12 15:05:00.861505+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.250173
License: Public Domain

Supreme Court of Florida
                  THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2023

University of Florida Board of                       SC2022-0068
Trustees, et al.,                             Lower Tribunal No(s).:
              Petitioner(s)                              1D21-634
v.                                        012019CA001827XXXXXX

Laurie Carmody,
           Respondent(s)

     Petitioners’ “Motion for Rehearing” is hereby denied.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS,
and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.
SASSO, J., did not participate.

LABARGA, J., concurring.

     While I agree that rehearing on the merits is not warranted, I

do adhere to my concurring in result, dissenting in part opinion,

where I dissented to the majority’s unilateral decision to amend

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. See Univ. of Fla. Bd. of

Trs., et al. v. Carmody, 48 Fla. L. Weekly S150, S154 (Fla. July 6,

2023) (Labarga, J., concurring in result, dissenting in part).
CASE NO.: SC2022-0068
Page Two

A True Copy
Test:

SC2022-0068 10/12/2023

SC2022-0068 10/12/2023

SO

Served:

Jessica N. Cochran
Kansas R. Gooden
Dimitrios A. Peteves
Bryan S. Gowdy
Andrew S. Bolin
Francis E. Pierce, III
Kennan G. Dandar
Timothy M. Dandar
Adam Richardson
Christine R. Davis
1DCA Clerk