Court Opinion

ID: 4118474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-01-25 20:11:52.959558+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:19.513270
License: Public Domain

People v Oldham (2017 NY Slip Op 00489)

People v Oldham

2017 NY Slip Op 00489

Decided on January 25, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 25, 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2015-07745
 (Ind. No. 2188-14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vAnthony Oldham, also known as Anthony J. Oldham, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Caren C. Manzello of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), imposed July 8, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256).
ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court