Court Opinion

ID: 9909810
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-14 14:00:54.151886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:50:10.175801
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-12569    Document: 43-1     Date Filed: 12/14/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-12569
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       ALEX SEXTON NEAL,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Alabama
                 D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00116-ECM-CWB-1
                           ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12569     Document: 43-1     Date Filed: 12/14/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                     Opinion of the Court                 22-12569

       Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              J.D. Lloyd, appointed counsel for Alex Sexton Neal, has filed
       a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pur-
       suant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
       review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
       relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent exam-
       ination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
       counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation
       of Neal’s supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.