Court Opinion

ID: 994823
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:28:37.455774+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:30.908282
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 97-7376

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

FLOYD GADSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief
District Judge. (CR-93-33-MU, CA-95-438-3-MU)

Submitted:   April 16, 1998                 Decided:   April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Gadson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Gadson, Nos. CR-93-33-MU; CA-95-438-3-MU
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to remand and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2