Court Opinion

ID: 6561723
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:16:08.391995+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:33.872739
License: Public Domain

Per Ouriam.
We assume that the resolution relates to the fund arising from the sales of agricultural public lands in pursuance of the act of congress of March 3, 1875, providing for the admission of Colorado as a state into the Union. Section 12 of said act reads as follows: “Sec. 12. That five per centum of the proceeds of the sale of agricultural public lands lying within said state which shall be sold by the United States subsequent to the admission of said state into the Union, after deducting all the expenses incident to the same, shall be paid to the said state for the purpose of making such internal improvements within said state as the legislature thereof may direct. * * * ”
In the determination of the question presented by the resolution, article 16 of our constitution, relating to irrigation, must be considered in connection with the act of congress above quoted. The act of congress places no limit upon the power of the general assembly over the fund, except that it shall be used for the purpose of internal improvement within the state. We have no hesitation in saying that public reservoirs for the storage of water for irrigation and domestic uses are internal improvements, and that the general assembly may lawfully make appropriations from such fund for such purposes.
It is more difficult to give a direct answer to the second branch of the question embraced in the resolution. The constitution guaranties the right to divert the unappropriated waters of natural streams to beneficial uses; *289but it says nothing- about changing the channels of natural streams.
We discover no objection to appropriating the fund in question for the purpose of diverting water from natural streams, and storing the same in reservoirs for the uses mentioned, due regard being had for all prior water-rights.