Court Opinion

ID: 2945456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-16 03:06:54.264949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:34.530146
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-27,392-13

JOE ADAM RAMIREZ, Relator

v.

NUECES COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 92-CR-1067 IN THE 117TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM NUECES COUNTY

 Per curiam.

O R D E R

	Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 117th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that
the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.  
	 In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of 
Nueces County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such
habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to be
investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); or stating that
Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Nueces County. Should the
response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was
served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for
leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the
appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: February 9, 2011
Do not publish