Court Opinion

ID: 997269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:53:49.030355+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:38.499598
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6875

PERCELL RICHARDSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LOUIS
NEWSOME,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-284-5-BR)

Submitted:   November 19, 1998            Decided:   December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percell Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Percell Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Richardson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction,

No. CA-98-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2