Court Opinion

ID: 8621981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 09:33:33.488151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:33.086265
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *514the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.