Court Opinion

ID: 8441247
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 18:35:21.258234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:49.378121
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derwin Coles appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coles, No. 2:01-cr-00254-3 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.