Court Opinion

ID: 9833510
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:46:31.744007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:03.719088
License: Public Domain

On Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing.
The judgment appealed from rested solely upon the conclusion of the trial court that appellant’s claim of title by limitation was defeated by pendency of the injunction restraining the sale of the land involved under execution issued by virtue of ap-pellee’s judgment lien. We adhere to the conclusion that the trial court erred in that holding, as well as to our judgment of reversal upon that ground. If the evidence were so full and complete and definite upon the issue of limitation as to warrant this court in rendering judgment contrary to the trial judge’s finding of fact upon the issue of limitation, then. this court might with propriety affirm the judgment based upon a different ground. But, as stated in the original disposition, the evidence upon the issue of limitation is not full or satisfactory, and does not warrant affirmance in direct conflict with an adverse finding upon that issue below.
Appellee’s motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.