Court Opinion

ID: 9706624
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 01:47:53.084631+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:41:34.598679
License: Public Domain

Concurring Opinion
Royse, J.
I agree with the conclusion of the majority in this case. I believe there was sufficient evidence to sustain the charge of cruel and inhuman treatment against appellant, and that such treatment followed the reconciliation of December, 1952. I believe the fact that the parties hereto cohabited together as husband and wife was a condonation of all acts of cruel and inhuman treatment from December 22, 1952 until the date of such cohabitation. The record discloses this last cohabitation was the voluntary act of the parties and not induced by fraud or coercion. However, as shown by the majority opinion, subsequently appellant was again guilty of acts which justified the trial court in granting the divorce. I cannot agree with the general dicta in the majority opinion on the question of condonation.
NOTE.—Reported in 122 N. E. 2d 137.