Court Opinion

ID: 6072491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 17:15:21.917553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:57.965230
License: Public Domain

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in conducting the suppression hearing in the absence of defendant without making inquiry into the circumstances of his absence or reciting on the record the basis for its determination that his absence was deliberate (see, People v McCullough, 209 AD2d 965; see also, People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend remittitur granted 76 NY2d *944746). We therefore remit the matter.to Monroe County Court to conduct a new suppression hearing and to “make findings of fact essential to the determination thereof’ (CPL 710.60 [4]; see, People v McCullough, supra).
The court did not abuse its discretion in declining to impose sanctions upon the People based upon their failure to comply with the procedures set forth in Penal Law § 450.10 before returning the stolen wallet to complainant (see, People v Johnson, 262 AD2d 1004, 1005, lv denied 93 NY2d 1020; People v Woodberry, 239 AD2d 448, 448-449, lv denied 90 NY2d 912). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence on the issue of identification (see, People v Owens, 275 AD2d 905, 906, lv denied 95 NY2d 937). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Moproe County Court, Marks, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.