Court Opinion

ID: 4276606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-05-18 16:01:34.014368+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:06:55.327421
License: Public Domain

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 17-1048V
                                      Filed: March 7, 2018
                                         UNPUBLISHED

    MARTHA A. BOUDREAU,
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
                        Petitioner,                          Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    v.                                                       Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                                             Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Administration (SIRVA)
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.

Susan M. Cremer, Law Offices of Michael Lawson Neff, PC, Atlanta, GA, for petitioner.
Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                                    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
       On August 3, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 8,
2015. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
Masters.
       On March 5, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, respondent has concluded that petitioner’s left shoulder injury is
consistent with SIRVA, as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
had no recent history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder; the onset
of pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular flu vaccination;
the pain was limited to the shoulder where the vaccine was administered; and no other
condition or abnormality, such as brachial neuritis, has been identified to explain
petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 2-3 (citations omitted). Respondent further agrees
that petitioner suffered residual effects of her condition for more than six months and
that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites to compensation under the Vaccine
Act. Id.
     In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                   s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                   Nora Beth Dorsey
                                   Chief Special Master