Court Opinion

ID: 9930660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-07 15:06:42.833212+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:24:14.065770
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
                            APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
     This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
  internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

                                                     SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
                                                     APPELLATE DIVISION
                                                     DOCKET NO. A-0212-22

IN RE 2019 SPECIAL RULING
AUTHORZING CERTAIN
ACTIVITIES BY HOLDERS
OF LIMITED BREWERY
LICENSES AND 2022
LIMITED BREWERY
SPECIAL CONDITIONS.

                Submitted January 29, 2024 – Decided February 7, 2024

                Before Judges Sabatino, Marczyk and Chase.

                On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Law and
                Public Safety, Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

                Jonathan    Morgan     Houghton     (Pacific   Legal
                Foundation), Caleb R. Trotter (Pacific Legal
                Foundation) of the California bar, admitted pro hac
                vice, Luke A. Wake (Pacific Legal Foundation) of the
                California bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for
                appellant Death of the Fox Brewing Co. (Jonathan
                Morgan Houghton, Caleb R. Trotter, and Luke A.
                Wake, on the briefs).

                Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General, attorney for
                respondent Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
                (Donna Sue Arons, Assistant Attorney General, of
                counsel; Kristina L. Miles, Nicolas G. Seminoff,
            Charlie A. Stegner-Freitag, Deputy Attorneys General,
            on the brief).

PER CURIAM

      We have been advised that his matter has been resolved and the parties

have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

                                                                      A-0212-22
                                      2