Court Opinion

ID: 588334
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:19:08+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:10.779797
License: Public Domain

972 F.2d 340
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Glen Roy KENDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James H. WHITE;  Larry Hoffman;  E. C. Morris;  Edward W.Murray, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6586.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  July 20, 1992Decided:  August 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-91-371-N)
Glen Roy Kendall, Appellant Pro Se.
William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Glen Roy Kendall appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Kendall v. White, No. CA-91-371-N (E.D. Va.  May 27, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED