Court Opinion

ID: 667341
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 15:20:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:53.727516
License: Public Domain

21 F.3d 424NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Calvin SLADE, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Mark EXLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-6151.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 1994.Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-1237-2)
Calvin Slade, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988) his action filed pursuant to  Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Slade v. Exley, No. CA-93-1237-2 (E.D. Va.  Jan. 3, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.