Court Opinion

ID: 3195908
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-04-20 15:03:41.030569+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:17:06.362627
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                            IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                            OF FLORIDA
                                            SECOND DISTRICT

OMAR T. CABALLERO and AUDREY        )
K. CABALLERO,                       )
                                    )
               Appellants,          )
                                    )
v.                                  )              Case No. 2D15-266
                                    )
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION      )
as trustee for RASC 2006-EMX7, and  )
WESTCHASE COMMUNITY                 )
ASSOCIATION, INC.,                  )
                                    )
               Appellees.           )
___________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 20, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Christine K. Vogel,
Senior Judge.

Elizabeth L. Hapner of Hapner Law,
Tampa, for Appellants.

Linda M. Reck of Greenberg Traurig, P.A.,
Orlando, and Michele L. Stocker of
Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,
for Appellee U.S. Bank National
Association as Trustee for RASC 2006-
EMX7.

No appearance for remaining Appellee.
KHOUZAM, Judge.

              Omar T. Caballero and Audrey K. Caballero appeal the final summary

judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee

for RASC 2006-EMX7. The Caballeros argue that U.S. Bank failed to prove that it had

standing to foreclose because it failed to show that the note was validly transferred to it.

We agree that, on the record before us, there was insufficient evidence to show U.S.

Bank's standing. Therefore, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. We

decline to comment on the remaining issues raised by the Caballeros.

              U.S. Bank filed the foreclosure complaint on October 27, 2011. Attached

to the complaint was a copy of the note and mortgage dated June 5, 2006, and

identifying the lender as Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc. The note bore a special

endorsement in favor of EMAX Financial Group, LLC. Also attached was a July 20,

2006, allonge transferring the note from Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc., to

Residential Funding Corporation and then by special endorsement from Residential

Funding Corporation to U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee. Finally, attached to

the complaint was an assignment of the mortgage from Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc., to

U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for RASC 2006-EMX7.

              On July 15, 2013, U.S. Bank filed the original note, a copy of the

mortgage, and a copy of the assignment. Attached to the original note was an allonge,

but it was not the same allonge that had been attached to the complaint. This new

allonge was undated and bore a blank endorsement from EMAX Financial Group, LLC.

                                            -2-
Though this allonge listed Mr. Caballero's name and the correct property address, it

contained a different loan number than the other documents.

              These documents are insufficient to show that U.S. Bank had standing to

foreclose. Though the copy of the note and the allonge attached to the complaint

indicate that the note was transferred to U.S. Bank, U.S. Bank never filed the original

allonge. "In order to prevail in a suit on a note and mortgage, the original note and

mortgage must be introduced into evidence or a satisfactory reason must be given for

failure to do so." Fair v. Kaufman, 647 So. 2d 167, 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Because

an allonge is essentially part of the note, see Isaac v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 74
So. 3d 495, 496 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), it was necessary for U.S. Bank to file the

original allonge along with the original note.

              Instead of filing the original allonge with the original note, U.S. Bank filed a

different allonge. This allonge contained a different loan number, so U.S. Bank failed to

establish that this allonge pertained to the correct loan. And even though this allonge

did bear a blank endorsement, it was undated, and thus U.S. Bank failed to establish

that this allonge and endorsement were attached to the note at the time the complaint

was filed. See Seffar v. Residential Credit Sols., Inc., 160 So. 3d 122, 125-26 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2015) (holding that the bank had failed to show standing where "[n]o evidence was

presented that the allonge was executed and attached to the note prior to the filing of

the initial complaint"). Finally, the assignment was insufficient to show standing

because it only purported to assign the mortgage, not the note. See Lamb v. Nationstar

Mortg., LLC, 174 So. 3d 1039, 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ("A bank does not have

standing to foreclose where it relies on an assignment of the mortgage only."). Because

                                            -3-
U.S. Bank failed to show standing, summary judgment should not have been entered in

its favor.

             Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

SLEET and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

                                        -4-