Court Opinion

ID: 996594
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:53:23.093802+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:21.659509
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 98-6228

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

SOLOMAN HAM, a/k/a Soloman Hamm, a/k/a Charles
Brewer,

                                                 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-90-53-N)

Submitted:   October 8, 1998                 Decided:   October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Soloman Ham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Ham, No. CR-90-53-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 12,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2