Court Opinion

ID: 9555775
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-15 10:08:23.60552+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:42:57.900201
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

                                       NO. 03-23-00445-CV

                                       In re Wardell Moore

                     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM FAYETTE COUNTY

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator Wardell Moore, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking unspecified relief. Having reviewed the

petition and the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App.

P. 52.8(a).

               The petition does not make clear the precise nature of the relief sought or the

person or persons to whom the requested writ should issue. The petition can be read in part as

complaining of a trial judge’s failure to recuse, but Moore has not provided this Court with any

record, any copies of his motions or the orders thereon, or any other documents, let alone

file-stamped copies to show that a properly filed motion is pending before the trial court. To the

extent Moore seeks relief that is within this Court’s jurisdiction to grant, it is the relator’s burden

to properly request and establish entitlement to such relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,

837 (Tex. 1992); In re Roberts, No. 03-12-00513-CV, 2012 WL 3629367, at *2 (Tex. App.—

Austin Aug. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); see Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (“Even a pro se applicant for a

writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”).        “In this

regard, the relator must provide the reviewing court with a record sufficient to establish his right

to mandamus relief.” Roberts, 2012 WL 3629367, a t *1 (citing Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837;

In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding)); see

also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k) (specifying required contents for appendix), 52.7(a) (requiring

relator to file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the

relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”).

               Based on the record that Moore has provided, we conclude that he has failed to

show his entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny his petition for writ of

mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

                                              __________________________________________
                                              Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Filed: August 9, 2023

                                                 2