Court Opinion

ID: 39183
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 20:21:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:12.142472
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  August 3, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                            No. 04-51326                          Clerk
                          Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS BALDERRAMA,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 3:04-CR-1058-ALL
                        --------------------

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Balderrama

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Balderrama has not responded to counsel’s motion and brief.        Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that

there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.