Court Opinion

ID: 9831027
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:43:17.555403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:41:12.010261
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
In our original opinion appears this statement:
“He also thereafter made the same statement before the examining justice court at Sealy, being the only witness testifying in that trial, and before the grand juries of both Austin and Bell counties, all these court appearances, however, being under process.”
On rehearing, appellant challenges the correctness of this finding, in so far as it recites that he made the statement before the grand jury of Bell county, as being unsupported by the evidence. ■ It is true that no witness testified to his having made the statement before the grand jury of Bell county, but the appellant himself in his trial answer in the cause admitted the facts to be just as the quoted recitation of our former opinion finds them.
After careful consideration of the motion for rehearing, we conclude that no sufficient reason is assigned for overturning our former judgment. The motion is therefore overruled. '
Overruled.