Court Opinion

ID: 95876
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-28 16:40:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:04:54.678441
License: Public Domain

189 U.S. 474 (____)
UNITED STATES
v.
BARNETT.
No. 235.
Supreme Court of United States.

Argued with No. 236, ante, p. 471, and by the same counsel.
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES:
This is the case of an enlisted man who makes a claim similar to the above, under Rev. Stat. § 1290, as amended. He was discharged on his own application, and the order of discharge stated that he was not entitled to travel pay. The foregoing reasoning also governs this case.
Judgment reversed.