Court Opinion

ID: 1087191
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-26 05:10:28.567167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:16.691695
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-40378       Document: 00512419881         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/25/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 25, 2013
                                     No. 13-40378
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GRANADOS-RODRIGUEZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:12-CR-1855-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Granados-Rodriguez
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez,
711 F.3d 541, 562 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June
6, 2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court explicitly held that the generic,
contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the
age of consent be lower than 17 years old and does not include an age-differential

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40378   Document: 00512419881    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/25/2013

                               No. 13-40378

requirement. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED,
and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

                                    2