Court Opinion

ID: 1006374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:10:23.824192+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:28.536419
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7252

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AIRRION CURTIS AGEE,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-97-287)

Submitted:   December 27, 2001            Decided:   January 14, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Airrion Curtis Agee, Appellant Pro Se. James Brien Comey, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Airrion Curtis Agee seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Agee, No. CR-97-287 (E.D. Va. July 11,

2001).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2