Court Opinion

ID: 5049061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-10-01 07:42:18.336886+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:54.108238
License: Public Domain

On original submission, when this Court consisted of five judges, this cause was reversed and remanded by three judges because there was no transcription of the court reporter's notes in the record even though none was requested. This writer, joined by Presiding Judge Onion, dissented. Now a majority of the Court which consists of nine agree that the judgment should be affirmed. We hold, as we have consistently done before the majority opinion on original submission was written, that in a habeas corpus proceeding the judgment will be affirmed absent a statement of facts or bills of exception where nothing has been presented for review. *Page 50 
The State's motion for rehearing is granted. The judgment is now affirmed.1
1 See Ex parte Henderson, 565 S.W.2d 50 (No. 57,115, this day decided).
VOLLERS, J., not participating.