Court Opinion

ID: 5384917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 09:20:19.353225+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:30:12.695773
License: Public Domain

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We conclude that facts sufficient to state a cause of action are alleged in the first cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint. It is unnecessary, therefore, to pass upon the second cause of action (Eidlitz v. Fischback & Moore, Inc., 239 App. *801Div. 483, 486). All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in plaintiff’s complaint in an action to recover the balance of a judgment secured by plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.