Court Opinion

ID: 1009905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:03:13.385645+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:36:06.779566
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Tyrone L. Roberson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the judgment filed August 27, 2002. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Roberson v. Warden, Evans Corr. Inst.,
  
  No. CA-01-4090-8-11-B1 (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2002). We also deny Roberson’s motion to amend his notice of appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.