Court Opinion

ID: 9734744
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 17:44:55.82753+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:50.948220
License: Public Domain

I concur. Jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure, section 411, subdivision 2, over a foreign corporation, which has done nonintrasíate business in this state, is constitutional in extent. (See Carl F. W. Borgward, G.M.B.H. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.2d 72, 75-77.) It is not the statutorially limited jurisdiction which obtains when the withdrawn foreign corporation formerly transacted only intrastate business here. (See Corp. Code, §§ 6203, 6408, subd. (a), 6504; U.S. Cap & Closure, Inc. v. Superior Court, 265 Cal.App.2d 408, 410-411 [71 Cal.Rptr. 184] ; Confidential, Inc. v. Superior Court, 157 Cal.App.2d 75, 80 [320 P.2d 546].)