Court Opinion

ID: 5619914
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 04:31:59.124177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:37:22.084328
License: Public Domain

Luke, J.
The evidence in the record being in sharp conflict as to material matters, this case comes within the rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed when the verdict is not demanded by the law and the facts. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Douglas v. Hardin, 161 Ga. 838 (2) (131 S. E. 896); Carr v. Carr, 157 Ga. 208 (121 S. E. 227) ; Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60) ; Louisville, & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

John T. Dorsey, John G. Bell, Morris, Hawlcins & Wallace, for plaintiffs in error.
Mozley & Gann, L. M. Blair, contra.