Court Opinion

ID: 2544982
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:18:21.72873+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:52.042789
License: Public Domain

350 S.W.3d 69 (2011)
Timothy McCOY, Employee/Appellant,
v.
EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P., Employer/Respondent,
and
Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96115.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
October 11, 2011.
Martin L. Perron, Maria Vitale Perron, For Employee/Appellant.
*70 Molly R. Batsch, Amy L. Blaisdell, St. Louis, MO, For Employer/Respondent.
Shelly A. Kintzel, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy McCoy appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).