Court Opinion

ID: 1000179
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:36:35.293522+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:36.459484
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 99-7218

JAMES R. VAUGHTER,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-579)

Submitted:   November 4, 1999          Decided:     November 10, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James R. Vaughter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James R. Vaughter appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.      We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opin-

ion and find no reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court.       See Vaughter v. Virginia Parole

Bd., No. CA-99-579 (W.D. Va. Aug. 18, 1999).     We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                              AFFIRMED

                                   2