Court Opinion

ID: 6216123
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-02-08 17:36:55.333308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:57:07.901295
License: Public Domain

McAdam, J.
A majority of the executive committee of the Whitehall Manufacturing Company authorized Stanley, Brown & Clarke to appear herein, for said corporation, and this was sufficient to justify the service by them of the demurrer, and their appearance must be treated as regular until the corporation itself, in some authoritative form, elects to question it. I do not mean to deny the power of the court, upon proper application made for the purpose, to require an attorney, under certain circumstances, to produce his authority to act in the particular matter at issue, but hold- that the plaintiff himself has no power to decide the question, in advance of such an application, in the expectation that his decision will be sustained, for an appearance by a responsible attorney is good until set aside, both as to the court and as to him (Denton v. Noyes, 6 Johns. 296 ; Hamilton v. Wright, 37 N. Y. 502, 505).
The plaintiff was irregular in his practice, and without considering any other question in the case (see Snape v. Gilbert, 13 Hun, 494), the motion to set aside the judgment will be granted, with $10 costs.