Court Opinion

ID: 996808
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:56:01.575813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:28.037752
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-7262

ARTHUR J. RIDLEY,

                                              Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,
Attorney General,

                                             Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-98-1201-JFM)

Submitted:   October 20, 1998              Decided:   November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur J. Ridley, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At-
torney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Arthur J. Ridley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. Ridley v. Beshears, No. CA-98-1201-

JFM (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2