Court Opinion

ID: 4504992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-02-06 08:03:29.258937+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:15.207681
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                          ATLANTA,____________________
                                                   January 29, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1087. LINDSEY JONES v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al.

       In this civil action, plaintiff Lindsey Jones asserted several claims against
defendants CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Citi”); Phelan, Hallinan, Diamond, & Jones, PLLC
(“Phelan”); and Main Street Renewal, LLC (“Main Street”). In a June 25, 2019 order,
the trial court: (i) granted Citi’s and Phelan’s motions to dismiss all but one of the
claims against them; and (ii) denied Jones’s motion for a default judgment against Main
Street.1 In a “Final Order” dated August 28, 2019, the trial court granted Citi’s and
Phelan’s motions to dismiss the only claim remaining against them. Jones then filed
this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
       In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating
fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties is not
a final judgment. Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385
SE2d 731) (1989). Under such circumstances, there must be either an express
determination that there is no just reason for delay under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or
compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See id.
Where neither code section is followed, the appeal is premature and must be
dismissed. Id.
       The record contains no indication that the trial court directed the entry of
judgment under § 9-11-54 (b) or that Main Street has been dismissed from this action.

       1
         The trial court denied a default judgment on grounds that the allegations in
Jones’s complaint did not establish any of the claims asserted against Main Street. The
trial court did not, however, dismiss any of the claims against Main Street or otherwise
dismiss Main Street from the action.
Consequently, because this action remains pending below, Jones was required to use
the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate
review from the trial court – to appeal the August 28 order. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b);
Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). Jones’s failure to do so
deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey
v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

                                      Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                        01/29/2020
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                      the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                      hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                        , Clerk.