Court Opinion

ID: 7598950
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:57:45.296859+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:23:12.928993
License: Public Domain

The trial court's summary judgment in favor of Dyess Outdoor Advertising is due to be reversed on the authority of StateHighway Department v. Headrick Outdoor Advertising, Inc.,594 So.2d 1202 (Ala. 1992).
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand this case for a determination of whether the billboards in question were erected and are being maintained illegally and must, therefore, be removed; and if so, for a determination of whether Dyess Outdoor Advertising is entitled to just compensation for the removal of the signs from the State Highway Department and, if so, what amount would justly compensate Dyess for their removal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.