Court Opinion

ID: 9655202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 19:02:30.399795+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:00:07.768938
License: Public Domain

WALKER, Chief Justice,
concurring.
The reason for this concurrence is to explain my own inconsistency. The three cases consolidated into this appeal all came from the 58th Judicial District Court where I as judge of that court, granted Defendant’s Special Exceptions which effectually defeated all of the Plaintiffs causes of action. I did so because I believed such action to be proper under the State of the law as it existed prior to this opinion and in spite of my personal or philosophical feelings of my own. I believe this to be the duty of a trial judge in spite of argument to the contrary.
I concur that these cases in all things be reversed and remanded for trial on the merits.