Court Opinion

ID: 999640
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:28:47.979213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:21:52.511301
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 98-6371

BRYAN GRAY,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

PATRICK T. CASEY,

                                              Respondent - Appellee,

          and

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

                                                           Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-97-423-5-BO)

Submitted:    July 31, 1998              Decided:    September 8, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Bryan Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court.   Gray v. Casey, No. CA-97-423-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20,

1998).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                 2