Court Opinion

ID: 8680746
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 05:01:29.937517+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:30.274185
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Donald Walters, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 105-month concurrent sentences for being a felon in possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Walters’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Walters the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Walters’s motion for judicial notice and counsel’s motion to withdraw are GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.