Court Opinion

ID: 8675446
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 01:49:50.733754+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:24.601248
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Durrant Farrow appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farrow v. North Carolina, No. 5:13-ct-03100-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.