Court Opinion

ID: 430571
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:32:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:42:31.914277
License: Public Domain

725 F.2d 1257
LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 81-5772.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 16, 1984.

G. William Shea, Peter W. James, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants-appellants.
(Opinion Sept. 1, 1983, 9 Cir., 1983, 714 F.2d 935)
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

1
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.