Court Opinion

ID: 1008917
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:47:46.783519+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:09.352634
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

LAMONT DIGSBY,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-00-88, CA-02-143-3-2-MU)

Submitted:   October 24, 2002             Decided:   October 31, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont Digsby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Lamont Digsby seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Digsby has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.     See United States v.

Digsby, Nos. CR-00-88; CA-02-143-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. July 31, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.   See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).   We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2