Court Opinion

ID: 5746121
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 16:49:41.150591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:09.736841
License: Public Domain

Plaintiff, an ironworker, was injured when a crane that was lifting a 25-by-25-foot steel “screen” or “curtain” failed, causing the screen to fall some 20 feet in the air before striking plaintiff. Although defendant asserts that it instructed plaintiff to use steel “cradles” to prepare the screens for hoisting, plaintiff and the coworker attested that no such cradles were available on the date of the accident, and defendant adduces no evidence to the contrary. Thus, defendant cannot argue that plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker, or that his actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Rivera v Ambassador Fuel & Oil Burner Corp., 45 AD3d 275, 276 [2007]; Ramos v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 306 AD2d 147 [2003]). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.