Court Opinion

ID: 9783596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-30 19:50:12.447387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:26.540972
License: Public Domain

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice,
dissenting and concurring.
For the reasons stated in my concurrence to the majority opinion in Laborielr-Guity v. State2, and in my concurring and dissenting opinion to the majority opinion in Kim v. State,3 I dissent from the majori*876ty’s holding that Appellant failed to preserve his Eighth Amendment complaint. I join the alternate holding that the sentences imposed did not violate the Eighth Amendment.

. 336 S.W.3d 754, 757-59 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref'd) (Dauphinot, J., concurring).

. 283 S.W.3d 473, 476-79 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref'd) (Dauphinot, J., concurring and dissenting).