Court Opinion

ID: 9461700
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 22:22:56.437837+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:37:13.772445
License: Public Domain

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
The motion of the government to correct the opinion herein reported as 515 F.2d 295, (9th Cir. 1975), is granted. In the opinion the term “Revenue Agent” is used. We think a “Special Agent” is generically within the term “Revenue Agent.” But it should now be understood that “Revenue Agent,” as it appears in the opinion means “Special Agent.” The government feels this is important.
The petition of the appellees for a rehearing in banc is first treated as a petition for a rehearing by the panel. As such, the petition is denied by the panel.
Secondly, the petition of the appellees for a rehearing is treated as a suggestion for a rehearing in banc.
The panel has advised the court in banc (Circuit Judge Wallace not participating) of the panel’s vote. No circuit judge has requested a rehearing in banc. Therefore, the suggestion for a rehearing en bane is denied.