Court Opinion

ID: 2654256
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-02-24 16:57:06.75719+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:39.699241
License: Public Domain

Case: 13-20320      Document: 00512540291         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/21/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 13-20320
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         February 21, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGEL OSMAR MADRID-JUAREZ, also known as Angel Omar Madrid, also
known as Angel Madrid, also known as Angel Madrid-Juarez, also known as
Angel Osmar Madrid Juarez, also known as Osmar Juarez, also known as
Angel Osmar Madrid,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:13-CR-2-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Angel Osmar Madrid-Juarez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011).    Madrid-Juarez has not filed a response.               We have reviewed

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20320    Document: 00512540291    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/21/2014

                                No. 13-20320

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2