Court Opinion

ID: 4698513
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-06-25 00:03:25.852917+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:53.996764
License: Public Domain

Filed 6/24/21 P. v. Groves CA5

                  NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

           IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                     FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

    THE PEOPLE ,
                                                                                             F080102
           Plaintiff and Respondent,
                                                                               (Super. Ct. No. BF176360A)
                    v.

    REGGIE GROVES,                                                                        OPINION
           Defendant and Appellant.

                                                   THE COURT*
         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. John S. Somers,
Judge.
         Robert Navarro, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
         Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
                                                        -ooOoo-

*        Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Smith, J. and De Santos, J.
       Appointed counsel for appellant Reggie Groves asked this court to review the
record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Groves was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within
30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. To date, no supplemental brief has been
filed. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to
Groves, we affirm.
                               PROCEDURAL HISTORY
       On June 24, 2019, the Kern County District Attorney’s Office filed an information
charging Groves with four counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act on a child under
the age of 14 (Pen. Code,1 § 288, subd. (a), counts 1, 2, 3 & 5), and one count of oral
copulation or sexual penetration of a child under the age of 10 (§ 288.7, subd. (b), count
4). As to counts 1 through 3 and 5, the information further alleged special circumstances
based upon the fact that the offenses were committed against multiple victims (§ 667.61,
subd. (e)(4)), and the victims were under the age of 14 (id., subd. (j)(2)).2
       On August 28, 2019, during jury selection, Groves entered an open plea of guilty
to all counts. In addition, he admitted the special circumstances alleged in the amended
information. The trial court indicated that it would impose the indeterminate sentences
associated with each count concurrently, rather than consecutive to one another.
       On September 25, 2019, the trial court sentenced Groves to a prison term of 25
years to life on count 5. On counts 1 through 3, Groves was sentenced to 25 years to life,
to be served concurrent with the sentence imposed on count 5. On count 4, he was

1      All undefined statutory citations are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
2      The information initially alleged counts 1 through 3, and count 5 carried a
sentence of life without the possibility of parole (§ 667.61, subd. (j)(1)). The information
was amended by interlineation to allege a possible sentence of 25 years to life in state
prison (§ 667.61, subd. (j)(2)). Defense counsel did not object to the amendment.

                                              2.
sentenced to a term of 15 years to life, which was also imposed concurrent with count 5.
In addition, the trial court imposed various fines and fees without objection by Groves.
       On October 9, 2019, Groves filed a timely notice of appeal. He did not request a
certificate of probable cause.
                                 STATEMENT OF FACTS
       As the parties stipulated to a factual basis for the plea, we only briefly recite the
facts supporting Groves’s conviction:
       On January 7, 2019, Groves reported to the police that he had sexually molested
three separate victims. During the course of an investigation, Groves’s spouse told a
sheriff’s deputy that Groves had previously admitted to fondling one of the victims and
on another occasion, Groves had admitted to orally copulating one of the victims. When
Groves was voluntarily interviewed by a sheriff’s deputy, he admitted to molesting three
separate victims on 10 different occasions, to orally copulating one of the victims, and to
tricking one of the victims into orally copulating him.
                                       DISCUSSION
       After independent review of the record, we find that no reasonably arguable
factual or legal issues exist.
                                      DISPOSITION
       The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

                                              3.