Court Opinion

ID: 7806810
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-07 06:11:39.227129+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:30:18.264371
License: Public Domain

In The
              Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                   No. 06-22-00032-CR

         JARED STEVEN LAWSON, Appellant

                            V.

           THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

          On Appeal from the 6th District Court
                Lamar County, Texas
                Trial Court No. 29014

      Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.
                                           ORDER

       Our review of Appellant’s brief in this matter indicates that it contains un-redacted

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with

the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R.

APP. P. 9.10(b). Sensitive data includes “the name of any person who was a minor at the time

the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The Appellant’s brief includes the real

names of child victims mentioned during trial.

       “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or

character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been

redacted.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d). To protect the identity of the child victims, we hereby strike

the Appellant’s brief and order that it be redacted in accordance with Section 9.10 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. We further order that Appellant’s properly redacted brief be

refiled on or before September 9, 2022.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                            BY THE COURT

Date: September 2, 2022

                                                 2