Court Opinion

ID: 5501202
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 02:59:46.890394+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:33:56.179456
License: Public Domain

Barnard, P. J.
The plaintiff is an assignee of a claim for goods sold by J. H. & N. H. Martin to the defendant." He procured a summons from a justice of the peace returnable on the 5th of January, 1891. At the return-day the plaintiff did not appear, but sent word that he desired an adjournment until some later period. The defendant appeared by counsel, and asked to dismiss the proceedings, because the plaintiff had failed to appear. This application was denied, and the case was adjourned, “on motion of thecourt,” until the 12th of January, 1891, at which day the plaintiff proved his case, and took judgment. The defendant failed to appear. The complaint was not put in until the adjourned day. The.practice is settled upon the point presented. The statute requires that the plaintiff shall appear within the hour after the return-hour. The issue is then to be joined. Code, § 2934. The adjournment may be had after issue joined, either upon the application of the plaintiff or of the defendant, or upon the motion of the justice himself. When the justice adjourns the case without an issue, he loses jurisdiction of the action, even if the plaintiff appear and ask an adjournment to obtain counsel. Duel v. Sykes, 13 N. Y. Supp. 166. If there be no appearance, judgment must be given for defendant. Code, § 3013. Wilcox v. Clement, 4 Denio, 160. In this case there was no appearance, and no issue, and no refusal of defendant to plead, because there was "no complaint put in. The justice, therefore, lost jurisdiction of the case, and the judgment of the county court should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.