Court Opinion

ID: 9720316
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 08:25:58.417946+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:24:15.911987
License: Public Domain

GARRARD, Judge,
concurring.
I concur in part III and concur in result to parts I and II. Concerning the pension, the court determined that the husband’s interest in the pension accumulated before October 26, 1990 should be awarded to him. No specific value was assigned to that award. The court had earlier found that the value of the pension accumulated during the marriage was $14,708. It then awarded husband’s pension to him at that value, and included that value in the value of the total assets to which the court applied its 60% computation. I am unable to determine from the findings or the record how the court arrived at this figure if, as it stated, it awarded the husband the amount of pension accumulated before October 26, 1990. I agree the court on remand must set forth its valuations so that its order may be subject to review.