Court Opinion

ID: 3561939
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:12:13.589512+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:01.584874
License: Public Domain

This was a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.
A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree entered in the Court of Chancery should be affirmed.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 271