Court Opinion

ID: 693763
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 05:21:03+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:25:26.796387
License: Public Domain

52 F.3d 321NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stevie LOCKLEAR, Petitioner--Appellant,v.Randy LEE, Respondent--Appellee.
No. 94-6687.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  March 28, 1995Decided:  April 18, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.  James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.  (CA-94-65)
Stevie Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.  Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Locklear v. Lee, No. CA-94-65 (E.D.N.C. June 1, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED