Court Opinion

ID: 9383147
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-29 18:00:50.227968+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:17:43.913974
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-12484    Document: 26-1     Date Filed: 03/29/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-12484
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       RANDY JONES,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                  D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00288-WFJ-SPF-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12484     Document: 26-1      Date Filed: 03/29/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       22-12484               Opinion of the Court                        2

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Michelle Yard, appointed counsel for Randy Jones in this
       direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
       v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
       entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
       of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
       entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
       to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s convictions and sentences
       are AFFIRMED.