Court Opinion

ID: 9832220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:43:11.353343+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:44.326175
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
We have given careful consideration to appellees’ motion for a rehearing and still adhere to the views expressed in the original opinion.
In support of the views therein expressed that plaintiff is a creditor, and by *363virtue of the use to which the money received from it was applied, is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the depositors and creditors proving their claims, we cite the following authorities: Andrew, State Superintendent of Banking, v. Bevington State Bank, 206 Iowa 869, 221 N.W. 668; Chase v. Hall, 9 Cir., 30 F.2d 195; Hays v. Wilkinson, 10 Cir., 72 F.2d 201; Smith v. Reconstruction Finance Corp’n, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 833.
The motion is overruled.