Court Opinion

ID: 7526709
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 05:03:51.12748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:38.642853
License: Public Domain

MILLS, Judge.
Schaeffer appeals Commission action establishing his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.
Whether credit is given for time on parole is within the Commission’s discretion. Section 947.21, Florida Statutes (1981); Coleman v. Wainwright, 323 So.2d 581 (Fla.1975).
The Commission correctly aggregated Schaeffer’s times after including a point for a parole revocation in his second commitment, Nord v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 417 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Schaeffer’s ex post facto argument is controlled by our opinions in Lopez v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.