Court Opinion

ID: 3074493
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 01:02:28.626359+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:39:32.466140
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-15-00032-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

GUMARO ROSALES AND VELMA ROSALES
AND ALL OCCUPANTS,                                                      Appellants,

                                          v.

GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC,                           Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the County Court at Law
                 of San Patricio County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria
                   Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      Appellants, Gumaro Rosales and Velma Rosales and all occupants, filed an

appeal from a judgment rendered against them in favor of appellee, Green Tree Servicing

LLC. On February 5, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's

record in the above cause was originally due on January 20, 2015, and that the deputy
district clerk, Alicia Cantu, had notified this Court that appellants failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.            The Clerk of this Court notified

appellants of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellants were advised that, if the defect

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would

be dismissed for want of prosecution.

       On February 5, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that they were

delinquent in remitting a $195.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants

that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from

the date of receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

       Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notices and have failed to pay the

filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

                                                   PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
26th day of February, 2015.

                                               2