Court Opinion

ID: 8672389
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-25 00:11:37.330979+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:21.729350
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
John Edward Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United, States v. Jackson, No. 5:05-cr00016-gec-bwc, 2008 WL 1901705 (W.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.