Court Opinion

ID: 996053
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:45:44.612924+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:01.750972
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 98-6571

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

REGINALD HENRY BOLT, a/k/a Reginald Holt Bolt;
a/k/a Saquan,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-89-249, CA-97-393-2)

Submitted:   July 30, 1998                 Decided:   August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Henry Bolt, Appellant Pro Se.        David Bernard Smith,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Bolt, Nos. CR-89-249; CA-97-393-2 (M.D.N.C.

Apr. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2