Court Opinion

ID: 9352694
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-09 14:00:43.121333+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:57:44.597129
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-12296    Document: 40-1     Date Filed: 01/09/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 21-12296
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
       versus
       JAMES GORDON HILL,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 3:07-cr-00275-TJC-MCR-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12296     Document: 40-1      Date Filed: 01/09/2023    Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                21-12296

       Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for James Gordon Hill in
       this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to An-
       ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
       the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hill’s supervised release
       revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.