Court Opinion

ID: 686857
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:37:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:41:32.856233
License: Public Domain

45 F.3d 425NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Norman Allen AYERS, Plaintiff Appellant,v.William SMITH;  Tyrone Haines, Deceased, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-7137.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  November 17, 1994Decided:  December 22, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  M. J. Garbis, District Judge.  (CA-94-2234-MJG)
Norman Allen Ayers, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Ayers v. Smith, No. CA-94-2234-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED