Court Opinion

ID: 2964905
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:32:49.271088+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:37.001880
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

        No. 96-2376

                                  STEVEN A. GRAHAM,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                      MAINE COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
                                            ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________

                                 ____________________

            Steven A. Graham on brief pro se.
            ________________
            Robert  F. Hanson,  Christopher C.  Taintor and  Norman, Hanson  &
            _________________   _______________________      _________________
        DeTroy on brief for appellees Bert Beverly, M.D. and Rock Welch.
        ______
            Andrew  Ketterer,   Attorney  General,  Linda  Conti  and  Francis
            ________________                        ____________       _______
        Ackerman,  Assistant Attorney Generals, on brief for appellees Lehman,
        ________
        Merrill, Lorenz and Farrington.

                                 ____________________

                                  September 5, 1997
                                 ____________________

                 Per  Curiam.  We  have reviewed the  parties' briefs and
                 ___________

            the record on appeal.   We affirm the amended judgment of the

            district court, dated  October 29, 1996, essentially  for the

            reasons   stated   in  the   magistrate-judge's   recommended

            decision, dated September 30, 1996.

                 Affirmed.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                 _________

                                         -2-