Court Opinion

ID: 5976731
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 07:58:26.641151+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:48:44.723246
License: Public Domain

Appeal from an order of the Orleans County Court (James P Punch, J.), entered May 8, 2012. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Although “[a] sex offender facing risk level classification under SORA has a right to . . . effective assistance of counsel” (People v Willingham, 101 AD3d 979, 979 [2012]), we conclude that, viewing the evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case in totality and as of the time of representation, defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see People v Young, 108 AD3d 1232, 1232 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 853 [2013], rearg denied 22 NY3d 1036 [2013]; see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defense counsel erred in failing to object to the admission in evidence of the document at issue, we conclude that the case summary alone is sufficient to support County Court’s determination with respect to the risk factor at issue (see Young, 108 AD3d at 1232; People v Guzman, 96 AD3d 1441, 1441-1442 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 812 [2012]).
Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.