Court Opinion

ID: 6510236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 18:21:43.128213+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:54:51.324976
License: Public Domain

MANNING, J.
This was an action at law, brought by appellee, Glenn, to recover possession, from appellants, of a parcel of land. Plaintiff claimed title by an instrument in writing, purporting to be a mortgage of the property, to secure payment of a note of the mortgagor, one Bobertson, for borrowed money. But the instrument was not attested by any subset ibing witness, nor was the execution of it acknowledged by the mortgagor. It was, therefore, according to the statute, not effectual to transfer the legal title to the mortgagee. Though evidence of the contract which the parties to it made, and available in a court of chancery, if Robertson was owner of the land, the writing did not operate to convey the land so as to enable the plaintiff to maintain an action to recover it in a court of law. — Code of 1876, § 2145 ; Hendon v. White, 52 Ala. 597; Harrison v. Simons, 55 Ala. 510.
The judgment of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and the cause be remanded.