Court Opinion

ID: 2931343
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 01:08:17.865912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:54:39.399624
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 12, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 12, 2005.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-04-00759-CR
____________
 
NATERAM SINGH,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the
183rd District Court
Harris County,
Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
868,711
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O
P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to driving while intoxicated
and was placed on probation, which the trial court subsequently revoked.  On July 28, 2004, the trial court sentenced
appellant to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 
Appellant filed a written notice of appeal.  

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine
the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has
been filed.
We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without
merit.  Further, we find no reversible
error in the record.  A discussion of the
brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum
Opinion filed May 12, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices
Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).