Court Opinion

ID: 996573
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:52:51.717409+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:23.932535
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-7745

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

KEVIN TYRONE BALDWIN,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-238-A, CA-96-1642-A)

Submitted:   September 30, 1998           Decided:   October 13, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Tryone Baldwin, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Kevin Tyrone Baldwin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Baldwin, Nos. CR-90-238-A;

CA-96-1642-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2