Court Opinion

ID: 5913059
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 04:00:02.980484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:46:05.889371
License: Public Domain

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
*550Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Upon our review of the court’s charge as a whole, we conclude that the jury was properly instructed about the rules to be applied in arriving at its verdict, and the alleged errors do not warrant reversal of the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, cert denied 459 US 847; People v Quinones, 123 AD2d 793, lv denied 69 NY2d 749).
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence (see, CPL 330.30 [3]). The evidence proffered by the defendant in support of the motion is not of such character as to create the probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him (see, People v Zambrana, 142 AD2d 744).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.