Court Opinion

ID: 4147249
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-02-22 15:05:45.965273+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:27.427609
License: Public Domain

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                     MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                            IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                            OF FLORIDA

                                            SECOND DISTRICT

LEONARD EDWARDS,                   )
                                   )
           Appellant,              )
                                   )
v.                                 )              Case No. 2D15-5724
                                   )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
                                   )
           Appellee.               )
___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 22, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court
for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber,
Judge.

PER CURIAM.

             Leonard Edwards appeals the order summarily denying his motion for

postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2). We

reverse and remand for resentencing.

             A jury convicted Edwards of rape in 1972, and the trial court sentenced

him to life imprisonment. Edwards alleged in his sworn rule 3.850 motion that because

he was sixteen years old when he committed his crime, his life sentence is illegal under

Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and Horsley v. State, 160 So. 3d 393 (Fla.
2015). Relying on McPherson v. State, 138 So. 3d 1201, 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), and

Atwell v. State, 128 So. 3d 167, 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), the postconviction court

denied the motion because Edwards' life sentence did not exclude the possibility of

parole. Both of those cases held that Miller was inapplicable to juveniles who were

sentenced to life in prison with parole eligibility after a term of years.

              While this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court quashed

Atwell, holding that "Florida's existing parole system, as set forth by statute, does not

provide for individualized consideration of Atwell's juvenile status at the time of the

murder, as required by Miller, and that his sentence, which is virtually indistinguishable

from a sentence of life without parole, is therefore unconstitutional." Atwell v. State, 197
So. 3d 1040, 1041 (Fla. 2016). The court held that juveniles sentenced to life with the

possibility of parole are entitled to resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082,

921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2016). Id. at 1042-1043 (citing Horsley v.

State, 160 So. 3d 393, 395 (Fla. 2015)). See also McPherson v. State, 41 Fla. L.

Weekly S578 (Fla. Oct. 28, 2016) (quashing this court's decision, with instructions to

remand to the trial court for resentencing). Following Atwell, this court recently held that

a juvenile who was sentenced to life imprisonment with parole eligibility after twenty-five

years was entitled to be resentenced under sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402,

Florida Statutes. See Landy v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D2555 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18,

2016).

              Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Edwards' motion and remand

for resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402,

Florida Statutes.

                                             -2-
 
          Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

                                   -3-