Court Opinion

ID: 8607367
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 04:30:38.349748+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:17.474505
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
James Franklin McClelland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClelland v. Harris, No. 5:05-cv-00273, 2006 WL 3240751 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.