Court Opinion

ID: 9915439
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-05 16:01:03.142986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:14:45.228386
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-11493    Document: 36-1     Date Filed: 01/05/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 23-11493
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       KIRK MICHAEL LOHR,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                 D.C. Docket No. 6:22-cr-00097-CEM-LHP-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11493      Document: 36-1      Date Filed: 01/05/2024     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                  23-11493

       Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, and ROSENBAUM and GRANT,
       Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to
       the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See
       United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sen-
       tence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and
       voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir.
       2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by comments
       the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry,
       399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal
       includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal
       issues or even blatant error).