Court Opinion

ID: 9654663
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-23 18:46:37.066216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:12.334071
License: Public Domain

*873ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR TRANSFER
PER CURIAM:
By his pro se post opinion motion the defendant seeks a rehearing or transfer because the court’s opinion did not address issues allegedly raised by his pro se brief. It did not need to do so for the simple reason the pro se brief raised no issue worthy of observation.
His point that the issues dealt with in the opinion included issues of due process of law protected by the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States is so vague it states nothing. His second point is that the trial impermissibly subjected him to double jeopardy. Each of the seven counts involved a separate and distinct violation of the law. It requires no citation of authority to make it obvious the seven convictions did not constitute double jeopardy. The motion for rehearing or transfer is denied.
All concur.