Court Opinion

ID: 998171
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 17:07:13.459373+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:18:18.254838
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6761

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MR. OWENS,

                                             Defendant - Appellee.

                            No. 98-6762

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

JOHNNIE WATKINS,

                                             Defendant - Appellee.

                            No. 98-6913

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,
          versus

MR. OWENS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

                              No. 98-6920

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MR. OWENS,

                                               Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
97-3334-DKC, CA-97-3335-DKC)

Submitted:   March 11, 1999                 Decided:   March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762 dismissed and Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920
affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, David Phelps Kennedy,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

                                   2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

     Albert Curtis Mills appeals various district court orders in

two 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) actions.   We have reviewed

the records and the district court’s opinions and find no revers-

ible error.   We dismiss the appeals in Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762,

because Mills seeks to appeal non-existent orders. In Nos. 98-6913

and 98-6920, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.     See

Mills v. Owens; Mills v. Watkins, Nos. CA-97-3334-DKC; CA-97-3335-

DKC (D. Md. June 4 & 5, 1998).    We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                 Nos. 98-6761/98-6762 - DISMISSED

                                 Nos. 98-6913/98-6920 - AFFIRMED

                                   3