Court Opinion

ID: 9366519
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-26 21:00:52.98387+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:52.986071
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2148      Doc: 10         Filed: 01/25/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-2148

        In re: ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN, a/k/a Dizz-e, a/k/a Javon,

                            Petitioner.

                   On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1)

        Submitted: January 6, 2023                                        Decided: January 25, 2023

        Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Roberto Antoine Darden, Petitioner Pro Se. Dee Mullarkey Sterling, Assistant United
        States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News,
        Virginia, for Respondent.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2148      Doc: 10         Filed: 01/25/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Roberto Antoine Darden petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

        court has unduly delayed acting on his motions to compel, to unseal, and for disclosure of

        grand jury materials. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act.

        Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court ruled on Darden’s

        motions by order entered January 5, 2023. Accordingly, because the district court has

        recently decided Darden’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense

        with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

        materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                              PETITION DENIED

                                                     2