Court Opinion

ID: 9820079
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 06:51:36.872308+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:38:36.197281
License: Public Domain

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:
Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 And 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 2 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Dennis and Graves), and 13 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Higgin-son, and Costa).