Court Opinion

ID: 3666315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:16:15.896804+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:20:10.601397
License: Public Domain

According to the agreed statement of facts, the plaintiffs were owners of retention title contracts on certain personal property from the defendants Wilkins  Son, which were executed, registered and indexed in the proper registry in the county of Polk and State of Florida. Subsequent to such registrations in the State of Florida the defendants Westbrook etal. caused to be issued attachments against the said personal property in the county of Harnett and State of North Carolina to collect certain debts due them by the defendants Wilkins  Son.
This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to have the liens of the retention title contracts registered in the State of Florida declared superior to the liens of the attachments subsequently issued in the State of North Carolina. The Superior Court held with the plaintiffs and entered judgment accordingly, from which the defendants Westbrook et al. appealed, assigning error.
The sole question presented is: Are the liens of title retention contracts on personal property duly executed, registered and indexed in the State of Florida superior to the liens of attachments subsequently issued against the same personal property in the State of North Carolina? The answer is in the affirmative.
The general rule of comity, in the absence of a modifying statute, protects the lien of a retention title contract or chattel mortgage on personal property duly registered and indexed in the State wherein it was executed and the property was then located, after the removal thereof to another state without registration in the latter state. Applewhite Co. v.Etheridge, 210 N.C. 433, 187 S.E. 588, 5 R. C. L., at p. 987, Conflict of Laws, Chattel Mortgages, par. 68.
The judgment of the Superior Court is
Affirmed. *Page 329