Court Opinion

ID: 1021463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 23:06:52.169745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:06.786520
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Wardell Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order denying Jones’ motion for termination of garnishment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   United States v. Jones,
  
  No. 3:04-cr-00019-RLW-AL (E.D. Va. June 13, 2006). Jones’ motions for summary judgment and injunction are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.