Court Opinion

ID: 8435143
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 11:29:35.375785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:41.751911
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM**
Shuchao Deng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination. Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1199 (9th Cir.2004). We grant the petition and remand.
Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. The IJ’s credibility determination was based on minor inconsistencies between Deng’s testimony and two documents, which the IJ had excluded from the record. The IJ’s finding that Deng’s testimony was inconsistent with the police summons, regarding the manner of her summons, is not supported by substantial evidence because Deng was not afforded an opportunity to explain the perceived inconsistency. See id. at 1200. Furthermore, the inconsistency between Deng’s testimony and the medical document is minor and cannot be viewed as an attempt to enhance Deng’s claim of persecution. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1164, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2004).
We grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA to address the merits of Deng’s claim. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.