Court Opinion

ID: 505918
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 09:54:56+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:55:39.500646
License: Public Domain

846 F.2d 586
1988 A.M.C. 2704
SEAWINDS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NEDLLOYD LINES, B.V.;  Royal Nedlloyd Group, N.V.;  KNSMLines, B.V.;  American President Companies, Ltd.;  AmericanPresident Lines, Ltd. Sea-Land Corporation;  Sea-LandService, Inc.;  Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 A/S;  A/SDampskibsselskabet Svendborg;  A.P. Moller-Maersk Line;Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft;  Intercontinental Transport(ICT) B.V., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-2363.
United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 14, 1988.Decided May 16, 1988.

Thomas R. Fahrner, Michele C. Jackson, Michael R. Hudson (Furth, Fahrner, Bluemle & Mason), San Francisco, Cal., for Seawinds, Ltd.
M. Laurence Popofsky, Peter A. Wald, Andrea G. Asaro (Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe) and Charles S. Donovan (Walsh, Donovan, Lindh & Keech), San Francisco, Cal., for Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., Royal Nedlloyd Group, N.V. and KNSM Lines, B.V.
William I. Edlund, Walter R. Allan, John F. McLean (Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro), San Francisco, Cal., for American President Companies, Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.
Terry M. Gordon (Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter), San Francisco, Cal., and Robert S. Zuckerman, for Sea-Land Service, Inc.
Stanley O. Sher, Marc J. Fink, Kelly A. Knight (Dow, Lohnes & Albertson), Washington, D.C., and Gary S. Anderson (Farella, Braun & Martel), San Francisco, Cal., for A.P. Moller-Maersk Line, Hapag-Lloyd A.G., Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 A/S and A/S Dampskibsselskabet Svenborg.
Nathan Lane III, Ralph M. Pais, James B. Nebel (Graham & James), San Francisco, Cal., for Intercontinental Transport (ICT) B.V.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion.   See Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 80 B.R. 181 (N.D.Cal.1987).