Court Opinion

ID: 7630128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 18:19:38.81625+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:25:12.061984
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The duty to maintain Terminal No. 6 in the Port of Miami does not fall upon Seaes-cape. Metropolitan Dade County owns, cleans, inspects and maintains Terminal No. 6. Moreover, Port of Miami employees inspect, repair, maintain, and clean the terminal. Accordingly, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Seaescape. See Air Canada v. Smith, 357 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); see generally, Corrales v. Spieler, 588 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.