Court Opinion

ID: 8173206
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 21:28:28.181591+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:49.467360
License: Public Domain

OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,143.24 and an attorney’s fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.
The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion which it could not say was clearly erroneous. [6 V.I. 352.]
We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of thé District Court.