Court Opinion

ID: 3111469
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 06:55:59.896331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:52:21.971654
License: Public Domain

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 29, 2013.

                                        S  In The
                                     Court of Appeals
                              Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

                                     No. 05-12-01332-CV

                         MIKE JABARY, Appellant
                                  V.
      CITY OF ALLEN AND PETER SMITH, ESQ., CITY ATTORNEY, Appellees

                      On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court
                                   Collin County, Texas
                           Trial Court Cause No. 219-827-2011

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION
                       Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers
                                Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

       This appeal has been pending since September 28, 2012. On November 29, 2012, the

district court clerk informed the Court that the clerk’s record, which was overdue, had not been

filed because payment had not yet been received. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1, 35.3(a). On March 6,

2013, after the trial court sustained two contests to appellant’s affidavit of inability to pay

appellate costs, we ordered appellant to pay, within ten days of the date of the order, the trial

court clerk’s fee for preparation of the record. See Uranga v. Tex. Workforce Comm’n, 319
S.W.3d 787, 791 (Tex. App.–El Paso 2010, no pet.) (appellant bears burden of bringing forward

appellate record). We cautioned appellant that failure to comply would result in the appeal being

dismissed without further notice. See id. 37.3(b). Appellant responded by filing a “notice of

clerk’s refusal of payment” and “motion to require clerk to file clerk’s record.” He asserts in
both that by letter dated February 5, 2013, the district clerk informed him that the “breakdown of

the costs” for the clerk’s record was as follows:

       Clerk’s Record: 8517 pages @ $1.50 per page totaling: $12,775.90
       Paper copy of Record: 8517 pages @ $.25 per page totaling: $2,129.25
       And/or CD copy of Record: $20.00.

Construing the letter to mean he could choose from any of the three “formats,” appellant

requested a “CD copy” of the record and tendered a check to the clerk on March 12, 2013 in the

amount of $20. The district clerk, however, returned the check to appellant, explaining in a letter

dated March 14, 2013 that “if the Clerk’s Record is not paid for and prepared for filing with the

Fifth Court of Appeals, there is no CD copy available to produce.” Appellant contends the clerk

cannot “chang[e her] mind on what [she] want[s] to charge” for the record and “should be held to

[her] agreement.” Appellant requests we order the clerk to “deliver the record on appeal to this

Court’s Clerk for filing and award [appellant] attorney’s fees.” Appellees respond, asserting the

clerk’s letter setting forth the schedule of costs “plainly state[s] . . . there is but one way to have

the ‘Clerk’s Record’ filed . . . – by paying the $1.50 per page fee.”

       Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a) provides that the clerk “is responsible for

preparing, certifying, and timely filing the clerk’s record if: . . . (2) the party responsible for

paying for the preparation of the clerk’s record has paid the clerk’s fee, has made satisfactory

arrangements with the clerk to pay the fee, or is entitled to appeal without paying the fee.” See

TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a). Pursuant to Texas Supreme Court order and our local rules, the clerk

may file either a paper record or an electronic record submitted to the Texas Appeals

Management and E-filing System web portal. See id. app. C; 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R.

11.2(9).

       Although appellant argues the clerk’s schedule of costs reflects he could choose to have a

CD copy of the record filed, the supreme court order and our local rules do not allow for the

record to be filed in that format. See TEX. R. APP. P. app. C; 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R.
                                                 –2–
11.2(9). Additionally, any confusion that may have been created by the clerk’s February 5th

letter was clarified by the clerk when she stated in her second letter to appellant that the $20

would secure a CD copy of the record once the record had been “paid for and prepared for

filing.” Appellant has had more than a month since then to pay or make arrangements to pay the

required fee but has failed to do so, and nothing in either his “notice of clerk’s refusal of

payment” or “motion to require clerk to file clerk’s record” reflects his intent to do so.

       We DENY appellant’s motion to order the clerk to file the CD copy of the record and for

attorney’s fees. Because the record has not been filed as a result of appellant’s failure to pay for

the record, and appellant has been given a reasonable opportunity to pay or make arrangements

to pay, we DISMISS the appeal. See id. 37.3(b).

                                                      /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
                                                      ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
                                                      JUSTICE

121332F.P05

                                                –3–
                                        S
                               Court of Appeals
                        Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                                       JUDGMENT

MIKE JABARY, Appellant                                 On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District
                                                       Court, Collin County, Texas
No. 05-12-01332-CV         V.                          Trial Court Cause No. 219-827-2011.
                                                       Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers.
CITY OF ALLEN AND PETER SMITH,                         Justices Moseley and Bridges participating.
ESQ., CITY ATTORNEY, Appellees

        In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the we DISMISS the appeal.
        We ORDER that appellees City of Allen and Peter Smith, Esq., City Attorney recover
their costs of this appeal from appellant MIKE JABARY.

Judgment entered this 29th day of April, 2013.

                                                       /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
                                                       ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
                                                       JUSTICE

                                                 –4–