Court Opinion

ID: 9369579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-09 14:01:40.607395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:16.110827
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6504      Doc: 12         Filed: 02/07/2023     Pg: 1 of 2

                                             UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                               No. 22-6504

        JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.,

                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

                      v.

        JEFFREY DEAN PATANE, Physician Assistant (PA), in individual capacity; KEISHA
        W. O’KEEFE, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), in individual capacity; TAMARA L.
        ALLEN, Registered Nurse (RN), in individual capacity,

                             Defendants - Appellees.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
        Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00048-MR)

        Submitted: November 14, 2022                                      Decided: February 7, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        James Anthony Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Adam Moyers, BATTEN LEE, PLLC,
        Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6504      Doc: 12        Filed: 02/07/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               James Anthony Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment

        dismissing his complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no

        reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Barnett v. Patane, No. 1:19-cv-00048-MR

        (W.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED

                                                    2