Court Opinion

ID: 8377994
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-24 18:41:29.301698+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:46:37.090530
License: Public Domain

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-106, inter alia, to invalidate certain absentee ballots cast in a primary election held on September 10, 2013, for the nomination of the Working Families Party as its candidate for the public office of Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Clarkstown, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 24, 2013, which, after a hearing, in effect, granted the motion of the respondent Wayne T. Ballard to dismiss the petition, and dismissed the petition and the proceeding.Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.The Supreme Court properly, in effect, granted the motion of the respondent Wayne T. Ballard to dismiss the petition. The allegations in the petition in support of the claim of fraud were not sufficiently specific (see CPLR 3016 [b]; Matter of Robinson v Edwards, 54 AD3d 682, 683 [2008]; Matter of Graham v Umane, 254 AD2d 359, 359 [1998]), and the petition failed to allege that the absentee ballot applications at issue did not comply with Election Law § 8-400 (3) (c) (i) (see Matter of Cohen v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections, 83 AD3d 1063 [2011]). Thus, the respondents did not receive adequate notice of the allegations supporting the petition.In any event, at the hearing the petitioner failed to submit any evidence to substantiate his claim that the collection of absentee ballots by the respondent Wayne T. Ballard was permeated by fraud (see generally Matter of Kolb v Casella, 270 AD2d 964, 965 [2000]). Moreover, the absentee ballot application forms provided by the Rockland County Board of Elections and completed by voters sufficiently complied with the requirements of Election Law § 8-400 (see Election Law § 8-400 [10]; see also Matter of Stewart v Chautauqua County Bd. of Elections, 14 NY3d 139, 150-151 [2010]; Matter of Panio v Sunderland, 4 NY3d 123, 127-128 [2005]). Chambers, J.P., Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.