Court Opinion

ID: 9556488
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-17 15:07:26.884834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:01:34.703128
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
                                                 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
                                                       AUGUST 17, 2023
                                                  STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                   IN THE SUPREME COURT
                   STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

                                 2023 ND 162

In the Matter of the Application for
Disciplinary Action Against Mark J.
Pilch, a member of the the Bar of
the State of North Dakota
      ----------
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court
of the State of North Dakota,                    Petitioner
      v.
Mark J. Pilch,                                  Respondent

                                 No. 20230152

Application for disciplinary action.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Per Curiam.
                        Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
                               No. 20230152

Per Curiam

[¶1] The Supreme Court has before it a report from a hearing panel of the
disciplinary board recommending Mark J. Pilch be suspended from the practice
of law in North Dakota and pay $250 in costs and expenses of the disciplinary
proceeding. We adopt the hearing panel’s findings and recommended
sanctions, and order suspension.

[¶2] Pilch was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on April 29, 2019.
Pilch’s license was suspended October 31, 2022, for failing to comply with
continuing education reporting requirements. He did not pay a license fee for
2023, and is not licensed at this time. Pilch practiced law at Pilch Law Firm in
Fargo, North Dakota.

[¶3] On November 4, 2022, Pilch was served with a summons and petition for
discipline. Pilch failed to answer the petition and Disciplinary Counsel moved
for default. Pilch is in default and the charges in the amended petition for
discipline are deemed admitted under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 3.1(E)(2).

[¶4] On May 25, 2023, the hearing panel filed default findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendations for discipline. The hearing panel
found Pilch was contacted to represent a client in a small claims court case.
Pilch was unprepared for the representation, failed to be prompt in his
representation, failed to inform the client of decisions to be made, failed to
notify the client of the termination of his services, and failed to return the
client’s property and papers.

[¶5] The hearing panel concluded Pilch’s conduct violated N.D.R.Prof.
Conduct 1.1, Competence, by being unprepared for the representation,
specifically unprepared to conduct trial on July 21, 2021, and failed to
understand the legal doctrines and procedures underlying small claims court
actions; 1.2(a), Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between
Client and Lawyer, by failing to inform the client of the settlement offer; 1.3,
Diligence, by failing to be prompt in his general representation and failing to

                                       1
appear for trial on time; 1.4, Communication, by failing to inform the client of
the decisions that needed to be made within the matter, failing to comply with
reasonable requests for information, failing to consult with his client regarding
means of representation, and generally failing to keep the client informed; and
1.16, Declining or Terminating Representation, by failing to notify the client of
the termination of services and failing to return the client’s property and
papers.

[¶6] The hearing panel considered the appropriate sanction under the North
Dakota Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, and concluded suspension
was the appropriate sanction. Pilch engaged in a pattern of neglect with regard
to his time management and filing the case, arrived late to trial, failed to
prepare exhibits, and failed to properly terminate the representation and
return client property. Pilch was generally unprepared to conduct
representation and failed to understand relevant doctrine, generally
communicated poorly with the client throughout representation, failed to
explain pertinent financial information regarding his services, and failed to
explain elements of the judgment in the case.

[¶7] On May 25, 2023, this matter was referred to this Court under N.D.R.
Lawyer Discipl. 3.1(F)(2). The hearing panel’s report was served on Pilch and
disciplinary counsel on May 25, 2023, and forwarded to the Supreme Court.
Objections were due within 20 days of service of the report. No objections were
received, and the matter was submitted to the Court for consideration.

[¶8] IT IS ORDERED that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
recommendations by the hearing panel are accepted.

[¶9] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mark J. Pilch is SUSPENDED from
the practice of law for one year, effective immediately.

[¶10] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pilch pay the costs and expenses of
these disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $250, payable to the Secretary
of the Disciplinary Board, 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 180, Bismarck,
North Dakota 58505-0530, within 30 days of entry of judgment.

                                       2
[¶11] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for any amounts already paid by the
North Dakota Client Protection Fund on Pilch’s behalf, he make restitution
within 90 days of entry of the judgment in this matter. For any amounts
relating to this matter paid in the future by the North Dakota Client Protection
Fund, Pilch make restitution to the Fund within 90 days of receiving notice
payment was made.

[¶12] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pilch comply with N.D.R. Lawyer
Discipl. 6.3 regarding notice.

[¶13] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
      Daniel J. Crothers
      Lisa Fair McEvers
      Jerod E. Tufte
      Douglas A. Bahr

                                       3