Court Opinion

ID: 8604713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 02:15:46.376848+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:14.734054
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Harold Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. *485§ 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Ledford, No. l:06-cv-00152 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2006, June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.