Court Opinion

ID: 8756800
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 11:49:23.541564+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:17.864335
License: Public Domain

PLATT, District Judge.
The merchandise in question consists of caviar, the roe of the sturgeon. It was assessed for duty by the collector of customs under paragraph 258 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G, 30 Stat. 171 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1650], as “fish, in tin packages.” The importers protested against said classification and assessment, and claimed the merchandise to be properly dutiable, under the provisions of section 6 of said act (30 Stat. 205 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693]), as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The board of general appraisers overruled the protest of the importers, holding the merchandise to be dutiable, either directly or by similitude, as fish, under said paragraph 258 and section 7, 30 Stat. 205 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693].
I do not agree with the board of appraisers on the proposition that this caviar is fish, but think, under the similitude clause, that, since it is so near fish in quality, texture, and the use to which it may be” applied (especially the use), that provision should control.
The decision of the board is therefore affirmed.