Court Opinion

ID: 8451351
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:30:01.274241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.893622
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.