Court Opinion

ID: 656387
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:52:50+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:51.345318
License: Public Domain

8 F.3d 818
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Warren L. HOLDERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Preston OLDHAM;  Clarence Wallace;  Susan Frye, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6844.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  October 5, 1993.Decided:  October 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.  Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.  (CA-93-363)
Warren L. Holderman, Appellant Pro Se.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Holderman v. Oldham, No. CA-93-363 (M.D.N.C. July 20, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED