Court Opinion

ID: 6763836
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:34:23.141184+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:40.033064
License: Public Domain

On Petition for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward A. Heffernan.
The court coming now to consider its order of April 3, 1991, suspending respondent, Edward A. Heffernan, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that Edward A. Heffernan be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 260, 569 N.E.2d 1027.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.