Court Opinion

ID: 5586631
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:55:26.031216+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:36:16.434113
License: Public Domain

Russell, C. J.
I concur in the judgment of reversal and in the several rulings of the majority of the court, except the 4th, 7th, and 9th headnotes. In my opinion the mental condition of the maker of any instrument may be best illustrated by extending the examination for the longest possible time, because a condition once existing is presumed to continue. I dissent from the 7th and 9th headnotes, for the same reasons that constrained me to dissent in the case of Dyar v. Dyar, 161 Ga. (supra).