Court Opinion

ID: 9533609
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:33:08.019425+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:29:05.873751
License: Public Domain

WUEST, Chief Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur with the majority’s disposition of Issues II and III. I do not agree that the trial court’s alimony award constituted an abuse of discretion. See Gibson v. Gibson, 437 N.W.2d 170 (S.D.1989); Hautala v. Hautala, 417 N.W.2d 879 (S.D.1988); Tate v. Tate, 394 N.W.2d 309 (S.D.1986); Temple v. Temple, 365 N.W.2d 561 (S.D. 1985).