Court Opinion

ID: 7169581
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 16:24:59.233895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:15:40.717597
License: Public Domain

MONROE, C. J.
The questions presented in this case being the same as those considered in the case bearing the same title and the number 21196 (68 South. 834),1 this day decided, the reasons assigned in that case are adopted for the purposes of this; and it is adjudged and decreed that the rule herein issued be discharged, the demand of the relator rejected, and this proceeding dismissed.
PROVOSTY and O’NIELL, JJ., dissent in the refusal of the court to grant a rehearing.

Ante, p. 478.