Court Opinion

ID: 2538754
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 10:15:24.299972+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:35:25.185604
License: Public Domain

352 S.W.3d 679 (2011)
Jeremy L. GOODSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96118.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
November 15, 2011.
Matthew Ward, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Goodson (Movant) appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).