Court Opinion

ID: 9833269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 22:34:25.688269+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:44:01.068271
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.
[2] The attack on the constitutionality of the act of April 2,1917 (General Laws, p. 388, [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, art. 1903]) amending article 1903, Revised Statutes 1911, seems to be without merit. See Womack v. Gardner, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 367, 30 S. W. 589; Womack v. Garner (Tex. Sup.) 31 S. W. 358; Gunter v. Tex. Land & Mortg. Co., 82 Tex. 498, 17 S. W. 840 ; 25 R. C. L. 871.
The court is still of the opinion the question as to the meaning of the act was correctly determined, and therefore think the mo,tion should be overruled.