Court Opinion

ID: 2691492
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-08-01 21:05:19.547912+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:57:02.384740
License: Public Domain

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1238, 2010-Ohio-4679.]

                        DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KRAEMER.
                     [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer,
                       126 Ohio St. 3d 1238, 2010-Ohio-4679.]
 (No. 2009-2336 — Submitted August 26, 2010 — Decided September 2, 2010.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                 __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, Bradley M. Kraemer, Attorney
Registration No. 0070329, last known business address in Hamilton, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 21, 2010,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of two years with one year stayed and with credit for one year of
respondent’s interim suspension, finds that respondent has substantially complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the
practice of law in the state of Ohio upon the conditions that he continue to
participate in mental health counseling and complete a two-year period of
probation monitored by relator. If respondent fails to meet these conditions, the
stay will be lifted, and he will serve the remaining one year as an actual
suspension from the practice of law.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this
order, relator shall file with the Clerk of this court the name of the attorney who
will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is
further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary period, relator shall
file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent complied
with the terms of the probation.
                             SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

       {¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period
respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R.
V(9). It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated until
(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance
with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders
issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government
of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating
that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court
orders that the probation be terminated.
       {¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the
costs of publication.
       {¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer, 126 Ohio
St.3d 163, 2010-Ohio-3300, 931 N.E.2d 571.
       BROWN,      C.J.,   and   PFEIFER,       LUNDBERG   STRATTON,     O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
                            ______________________

                                            2