Court Opinion

ID: 9633985
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-22 12:10:51.373938+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:08:46.677871
License: Public Domain

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
Concurring and Dissenting.— I concur in the judgment. I also agree with the reasoning of the plurality opinion, except for that contained in part II, respecting the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code section 66000 et seq. I agree with Justice Kennard there is no need for us to construe the act in order to decide this case. (Cone, and dis. opn. of Kennard, J., ante, at p. 903.) Accordingly, I would decline to do so.
The petition of appellant Richard K. Ehrlich for a rehearing was denied April 11, 1996. Kennard, J., and Baxter, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.