Court Opinion

ID: 991207
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 23:33:19.799691+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:33.388572
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 96-7238

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MARGARET F. SPENCER,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-94-75)

Submitted:   December 19, 1996            Decided:   January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Margaret F. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. David Glenn Barger, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her

motion for early termination of probation. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Spencer, No. CR-94-75 (E.D. Va. Nov. 28,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2