Court Opinion

ID: 50154
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 00:47:20+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:04.691019
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                     May 2, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 06-51199
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MONICO SOLIS-RODRIGUEZ,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:06-CR-239-ALL
                        --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Monico Solis-

Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-

Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense.    The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.