Court Opinion

ID: 9853741
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-24 05:53:22.441371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:03.690231
License: Public Domain

MAUGHAN, Justice
(concurring in result):
In the result, I concur. However, I disagree with the statement making the question of domicil one of fact alone, and thus attempting to preclude this Court from substituting its judgment for that of the trial court.
Domicil is a question of law. At best, it can only be a mixed question of law and fact. Had the trial court misapplied the law of domicil we could certainly substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. See Am.Jur.2d, Domicil, Sec. 101.