Court Opinion

ID: 9388045
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-19 18:02:45.804466+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:17.118083
License: Public Domain

Filed 4/19/23 P. v. Ayobi CA3
                                           NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

                IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                     (Sacramento)
                                                            ----

 THE PEOPLE,

                    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                                  C096935

           v.                                                                      (Super. Ct. No. 12F00488)

 SHAJIA AYOBI,

                    Defendant and Appellant.

         Defendant Shajia Ayobi appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for
resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable
issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo) and requesting we
exercise our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.
         On February 1, 2023, we notified defendant: 1) counsel had filed a brief
indicating no arguable issues had been identified; 2) as a case arising from an order

1 Defendant filed his petition under Penal Code former section 1170.95. Effective
June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered Penal Code former section 1170.95 to
section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.)

                                                             1
denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent
review of the record; and 3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo,
defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument
he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we did not receive
a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned.
More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant.
       We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
(Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
                                      DISPOSITION
       The appeal is dismissed.

                                                    /S/
                                                 MAURO, Acting P. J.

We concur:

    /S/
KRAUSE, J.

    /S/
MESIWALA, J.

                                             2