Court Opinion

ID: 9366257
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-26 15:05:05.462749+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:51.244320
License: Public Domain

Case: 22-40200      Document: 00516447860         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/25/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                  No. 22-40200                           August 25, 2022
                                Summary Calendar                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Humberto Cabrera,
                                                           Defendant—Appellant.

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:21-CR-747-2

   Before Jolly, Jones, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto
   Cabrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cabrera’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time
   response is GRANTED, and we have considered his response. The record

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 22-40200      Document: 00516447860          Page: 2    Date Filed: 08/25/2022

                                    No. 22-40200

   is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cabrera’s
   claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider
   the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,
   739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Cabrera’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Cabrera’s motion
   for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United
   States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The motion to seal
   the pro se response and the related motion is GRANTED.

                                          2