Court Opinion

ID: 9937246
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-09 19:01:00.547204+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:30.735668
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-40416         Document: 00517061064             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/09/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                      ____________                                     FILED
                                                                                February 9, 2024
                                       No. 23-40416                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                     Summary Calendar                                  Clerk
                                     ____________

   United States of America,

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Ashley Renee Cagle,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                           for the Eastern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 4:22-CR-126-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Ashley Renee Cagle has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Cagle has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
   developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cagle’s claims of ineffective

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-40416        Document: 00517061064       Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/09/2024

                                   No. 23-40416

   assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without
   prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841
   (5th Cir. 2014).
          We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
   record reflected therein, as well as Cagle’s response. We concur with
   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2