Court Opinion

ID: 32835
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 18:58:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:36.147029
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                     October 22, 2003

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                              No. 02-20373
                          Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD ARTHUR MCCLURE,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-01-CR-702-1
                      --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Richard Arthur McClure has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).       McClure has

filed a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.