Court Opinion

ID: 4423261
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-07 00:00:17.705336+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:48.038347
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-11477      Document: 00515066117         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/06/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 18-11477
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                   August 6, 2019
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                   Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

URIEL MENDOZA SANDOVAL,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:17-CR-235-1

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Uriel Mendoza
Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza Sandoval has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11477    Document: 00515066117     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/06/2019

                                 No. 18-11477

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2