Court Opinion

ID: 8455219
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 03:26:41.264503+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:03.253066
License: Public Domain

*79Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Eugene Webb appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Deboo, No. 2:09-cv-00107-JPB-JES, 2012 WL 1067971 (N.D W.Va. Mar. 29 & May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.