Court Opinion

ID: 8593374
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 15:56:42.780007+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:54:42.981387
License: Public Domain

On April 16, 1965, the court rendered an opinion, 170 Ct. Cl. 408, 344 F. 2d 333, together with findings of fact, hold*1176ing that plaintiffs were entitled to recover, with the amount of recovery reserved for further proceedings. On October 12, 1965, the court adopted the recommendation of the trial commissioner, including a stipulation of the parties filed October 4,1965, and entered judgment for plaintiffs as shown below:
Plaintiff Amount
Abbott, Proctor & Paine--- $2, 666.32
Bacbe & Co---10, 715.37
Blair & Co., Incorporated--- 2, 316.29
Courts & Co--- 2, 795.28
Dean Witter & Co--- 7,149.63
Dreyfus & Co--- 697. 05
duPont, Francis I. & Co--- 11, 945.17
Eastman Dillon, Union Securities & Co--- 3,349.20
Ctoodbody & Co--- 7,273. 55
Harris, Upbam & Co--- 6, 775.65
Hogle, J. A. & Co--- 3,031. 01
Hutton, E. F. & Co--- 7, 862.11
"Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated--- 21, 609.14
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis--- 6, 932. 52
Reynolds & Co--- 6, 625.28
Shearson, Hamm.ill & Co--- 5,257. 32
Thomson & McKinnon--- 6, 710.61
Walston & Co., Inc--- 9, 534.09
White, Weld & Co--- 2,484.62