Court Opinion

ID: 7427175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:49:13.797084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:25.409025
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petitions for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 1, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petitions for cer-tiorari are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.