Court Opinion

ID: 4689759
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-25 16:01:10.135045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:57.523402
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                      United States Court of Appeals
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          Tenth Circuit

                             FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                           May 25, 2021
                         _________________________________
                                                                         Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                             Clerk of Court
JEMAL DAVID RAWLINGS,

      Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.                                                          No. 20-7041
                                               (D.C. No. 6:18-CV-00389-RAW-KEW)
COMMISSIONER, SSA,                                          (E.D. Okla.)

      Defendant - Appellee.
                      _________________________________

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                         _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
                  _________________________________

      This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion for Vacatur and Remand

to the District Court. Upon consideration, the joint motion is granted. The district

court’s judgment is vacated, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings

consistent with the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Carr v. Saul, 141 S. Ct.

1352 (2021).

      The mandate shall issue forthwith.

                                            Entered for the Court

                                            Per Curiam

      *
         This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.