Court Opinion

ID: 8152415
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:35:17.657183+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:35.869110
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U. S. 359, 363; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79. (2) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 81 ; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157, 160; Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73. (3) Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251, 254, 255; Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 525; Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Illinois, 298 U. S. 155, 158.