Court Opinion

ID: 8652550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 21:06:21.428266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:56:35.784324
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Paul Yongo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to quash the clerk’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for an enlargement of time to respond to Yongo’s interrogatories. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Yongo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.