Court Opinion

ID: 9826115
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 15:22:25.173832+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:41:51.054026
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Eraser:
I concur in the result merely. I think under the case of Ex parte McCall, 68 S. C., 489; 47 S. E., 974, the location of a monument, like the location of a cemetery, may be removed when the location, on account of its surroundings, is no longer a suitable place for that purpose. I think the showing here is ample, that *109the present location has become unsuitable, and therefore the location should be changed.
Mr. Justice Watts concurs, as well as in the final opinion of Mr. Justice Marion.