Court Opinion

ID: 4691337
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-05-29 00:00:27.167422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:07.754901
License: Public Domain

Case: 19-20562     Document: 00515880552         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/28/2021

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        May 28, 2021
                                  No. 19-20562                         Lyle W. Cayce
                               Conference Calendar                          Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Mauricio Garcia-Salinas,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:17-CR-255-2

   Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Mauricio Garcia-Salinas has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Salinas has not filed a response. We have reviewed

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 19-20562     Document: 00515880552          Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/28/2021

                                   No. 19-20562

   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
   concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
   issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
   withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
   herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42. 2.

                                        2