Court Opinion

ID: 3202373
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-05-11 07:03:14.997929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:33.974567
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                       ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  May 02, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1533. THE CITY OF BYRON, GEORGIA et al. v. THE CITY OF
    WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA.

      The City of Warner Robins, Georgia (“Warner Robins”) filed suit against the
City of Byron, Georgia and several other defendants seeking inter alia mandamus
relief requiring the City of Byron to comply with an inter-governmental agreement
regarding the provision of wastewater services. Warner Robins moved for summary
judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. The defendants seek to appeal this
ruling.
      Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction
over all cases involving extraordinary remedies, including mandamus. See Ga. Const.
of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen, 280 Ga. 264 (626 SE2d 83)
(2006) (“‘[C]ases involving the grant or denial of mandamus are within the exclusive
jurisdiction of [the Supreme] Court without regard to the underlying subject matter
or the legal issues raised.’”) Here, although the trial court did not employ the word
“mandamus,” its order granting summary judgment could be construed as one
granting mandamus relief. See, e. g., CCC Builders, Inc. v. City Council of Augusta,
237 Ga. 589, 591 (229 SE2d 349) (1976) (a municipality may be compelled to
perform contractual duties either through an action for mandamus relief or a claim for
specific performance); Forest City Gun Club v. Chatham County., 280 Ga. App. 219,
220 (633 SE2d 623) (2006) (orders are construed according to substance rather than
nomenclature).
      Because it appears this case may involve the grant of mandamus relief, it is
hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. See Saxton v. Coastal
Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996) (Supreme Court has the
ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction).

                                       Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                                                            05/02/2016
                                              Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                              I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                       the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                              Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                       hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                       , Clerk.