Court Opinion

ID: 2734269
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-09-18 20:00:38.148286+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:26:48.094927
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-1336          Document: 50           Page: 1       Filed: 09/18/2014

               NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

    United States Court of Appeals
        for the Federal Circuit
                        ______________________

               CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC,
                     Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                        v.

  DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., FORTY NINERS
   FOOTBALL COMPANY, LLC, HELLY HANSON
      (U.S.) INC., LEVI STRAUSS & CO., NFL
    ENTERPRISES LLC, SPANX, INC., AND MLB
              ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P.,
                Defendants-Appellees,

                                      AND

                      THE FINISH LINE, INC.,
                         Defendant-Appellee.
                       ______________________

 2014-1336, -1338, -1341, -1342, -1343, -1344, -1345, -1346
                 ______________________

      Appeals from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:12-cv-00674-LED,
 6:12-cv-00675-LED, 6:12-cv-00945-LED, 6:12-cv-00947-
 LED, 6:12-cv-00948-LED, 6:12-cv-00949-LED, 6:12-cv-
 00950-LED, 6:12-cv-00951-LED, Chief Judge Leonard
 Davis.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

               CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC,
Case: 14-1336      Document: 50     Page: 2    Filed: 09/18/2014

 2 CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.

                      Plaintiff-Appellant,

                               v.

                     TORY BURCH LLC,
                      Defendant-Appellee.
                    ______________________

                          2014-1340
                    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
 Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:12-cv-00868-LED, Chief
 Judge Leonard Davis.
                    ______________________
                           ORDER
    Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to dis-
 miss 2014-1340,
       IT IS ORDERED THAT:
       (1) The motion is granted. 2014-1340 is dismissed.
       (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2014-1340.
     (3) The revised official caption for 2014-1336, et al. is
 reflected above.
                                      FOR THE COURT

                                       /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                       Daniel E. O’Toole
                                       Clerk of Court
 s26
 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (for 2014-1340 only):
 September 18, 2014