Court Opinion

ID: 5545409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-10 18:57:56.409029+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:34:54.647092
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
The appellant has not made out a good case for the reversal of this order. It appears to us that the criticism of the general term of the city court upon this affidavit is justifiable. It contains assertions of the falsity of the representations made by the defendant; but they are evidently based upon information only,.and the sources of- the information are not given, nor any. reason why better proof is not offered. Where, in a civil action, the plaintiff desires, so to speak, to enforce his claim at the outset by arrest and imprisonment of the defendant,—in other words, to have execution before obtaining judgment,—it is not too much to ask him to present such evidence as alone would be receivable upon the trial of the action to justify an ordinary judgment for money. Such has been the practice in this court, and we are glad to see that the city court is alive to the propriety of enforcing the same rule. We think that the decision of the city court is not only correct, but quite wholesome in its tendency. The order is affirmed, with costs.