Court Opinion

ID: 1008482
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:41:01.392636+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:40.586937
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-6475

STEVEN M. JOHNSON,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION,

                                                Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
01-3573)

Submitted:   August 29, 2002              Decided:   September 5, 2002

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.    John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Steven M. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint and

denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.   See Johnson v. Md. Div. of Corr., No. CA-01-3573 (D. Md.

Mar. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2