Court Opinion

ID: 2879750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 05:33:40.918436+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:55.036567
License: Public Domain

i          i       i                                                               i     i      i

                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                        No. 04-09-00625-CR

                                        Pedrito ESQUIVEL,
                                              Appellant

                                                   v.

                                        The STATE of Texas,
                                              Appellee

                     From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                  Trial Court No. 2009-CR-1664
                              Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
                  Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009

DISMISSED

           Appellant Pedrito Esquivel pleaded nolo contendere to indecency with a child by contact

pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea-bargain, appellant signed a separate

“Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is

a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2).

Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain
                                                                                       04-09-00625-CR

agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P.

25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right

of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

        The court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within

thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.

ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written

response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the

record and counsel’s notice, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State,

154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record

to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX .

R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

                                                       PER CURIAM

Do not publish

                                                 -2-