Court Opinion

ID: 8435061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 11:21:29.911699+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:41.683286
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Ricky Donnell Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Hamilton, No. CA-03-741-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED