Court Opinion

ID: 9703311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-25 23:51:58.325381+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:14:13.585598
License: Public Domain

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J.
(dissenting). I dissent from that part of the decision relating to comparative negligence. See Reiter v. Dyken, 95 Wis.2d 461, 290 N.W.2d 510 (1980) (Abrahamson, J., dissenting).
I am authorized to-state that Justice Roland B. Day joins in this dissent.
The following memorandum was filed June 27, 1980:
PER CURIAM
(on motion for reconsideration). Upon motions for reconsideration, the mandate is modified to read:
The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed in part, reversed in part and cause remanded for a new trial on the issues of liability and damages as to excavations 32, 40 and 47 consistent with this opinion.