Court Opinion

ID: 3896779
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:29:04.866325+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:24:49.984401
License: Public Domain

Honorable E. Bruce Curry District Attorney 521 Earl Garrett Street Kerrville, Texas 78028
Re: Whether a county may lease the right to cross county right-of-way to a pipeline company
Dear Mr. Curry:
You inform us that the Gillespie County Commissioners Court has established a policy whereby a pipeline company is required to obtain a permit from the court before running pipelines under public roads or highways located within the county. Your letter also indicates that the county's policy includes provisions whereby the county may lease such right-of-way crossings to a pipeline company in order to receive annual payments. In that regard, you ask whether a county has the authority to lease such right-of-way crossings to a common carrier subject to chapter 111 of the Natural Resources Code.
The legislature, having declared pipeline companies to be common carriers, has granted them the right to lay pipelines "along, across, or under" public roads or highways. See Nat.Res. Code §§ 111.020(a), 111.002. A county commissioners court has been granted the limited authority to approve and establish guidelines to regulate these pipelines. See Nat.Res. Code § 111.020(b)(4). Section 111.020(b)(4) provides that:
  (b) The right to run a pipeline or telegraph or telephone line along, across, or over a public road or highway may be exercised only on condition that:
    (4) no pipes or pipelines are laid parallel with and on a public highway closer than 15 feet from the improved section of the highway except with the approval and under the direction of the commissioners court of the county in which the public highway is located. (Emphasis added).
Thus, the Gillespie County Commissioners Court may require the pipeline company to obtain a permit which is reasonably related to carrying out the authority explicitly granted in section 111.020(b)(4). See Tex. Const. art. V, § 18; Canales v. Laughlin,214 S.W.2d 451, 453 (Tex. 1948). Section 111.020(c) requires the common carrier to compensate the "county or road district" for any damage done to the public road or highway. See Nat.Res. Code § 111.020(c). We believe that these provisions do not grant the county commissioners court the additional authority to lease right-of-way crossings to a common carrier pipeline company.
Moreover, common carriers are regulated exclusively by the Texas Railroad Commission under chapter 111 of the Natural Resource Code. See Nat.Res. Code, s 111.001 et seq. Section 111.020(d) expressly provides that a common carrier, in order to acquire the right of constructing pipelines along, across, or under public roads and highways must consent to be regulated by chapter 111. Such consent is "in consideration of the rights acquired." This language directly implies that the exchange of rights to construct for the power of the state to regulate is both mutual and exclusive, and no other power is conferred on the county to lease or convey the realty in question. Nat.Res. Code § 111.020(d). Thus, article 1577, V.T.C.S., which establishes a procedure whereby a county commissioners court may lease county owned real estate, does not apply to common carrier pipelines. See V.T.C.S. art. 1577 (establishes procedures for public auction).
 SUMMARY
Section 111.020(b)(4) does not authorize a county commissioners court to lease right-of-way crossings to pipeline companies, which are common carriers subject to chapter 111 of the Texas Natural Resource Code.
Very truly yours,
  Jim Mattox Attorney General of Texas
  Jack Hightower First Assistant Attorney General
  Mary Keller Executive Assistant Attorney General
  Robert Gray Special Assistant Attorney General
  Rick Gilpin Chairman, Opinion Committee
  Prepared by Tony Guillory Assistant Attorney General