Court Opinion

ID: 4216824
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-11-01 15:01:58.698253+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:42:11.311361
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

   DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC,
                Appellant

                           v.

             UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.,
                      Appellee
               ______________________

                      2016-1813
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
01252.
                 ______________________

              Decided: November 1, 2017
               ______________________

    LEI MEI, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC, argued
for appellant.   Also represented by LAURENCE M.
SANDELL.

    MICHAEL KIKLIS, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neu-
stadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also
represented by LISA MANDRUSIAK, CHRISTOPHER RICCIUTI;
JONATHAN RUDOLPH KOMINEK STROUD, Unified Patents
Inc., Washington, DC.
                ______________________
2   DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY   v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.

      Before MOORE, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
     Dragon Intellectual Property appeals the Patent Trial
and Appeal Board’s determination that claims 1, 2, 7, 8,
10, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 are invalid.
Our decision today in a related case, Dragon Intellectual
Property, LLC v. DISH Network LLC et al., Nos. 2016-
2468, -2492, affirms the Board’s determination that
claims 1–4, 7–10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent are inva-
lid. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
                DISMISSED AS MOOT
                         COSTS
    No costs.