Court Opinion

ID: 1011118
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:22:13.96865+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:40:46.253621
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 03-1520

FELICIA PFOUTS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-02-16-1)

Submitted:   July 10, 2003                 Decided:    July 15, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felicia Pfouts, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Felicia Pfouts appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.   We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court.    See Pfouts v. North Carolina

Central Univ., No. CA-02-16-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                2