Court Opinion

ID: 3659552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:11:37.194145+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:22:26.392075
License: Public Domain

The defendants were convicted and appealed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of Chief Justice Faircloth, and in the report of another case against same parties at this term. (See S. v.Bynum et al., ante, 749.) *Page 516 
The defendants are indicted in the ordinary form for stealing money and one pocketknife from the person of W.W. Harris, and were convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for seven years. The evidence showed that said Harris and B. E. Barbee were asleep at night by a camp fire when defendants assaulted and took from each one his separate money at the same time. The defendants excepted the judgment of seven years confinement as a violation of the act of 1895, ch. 285, and relied on the plea of autrefoisconvict. The record relied upon for the latter plea failed to support it, as it showed an offense against another man, i. e., B. E. Barbee, committed at the same time. S. v. Nash, 86 N.C. 650. The first exception is disposed of in the other case at this term against the same parties; also the bill in this case charges the offense against the person under section 2 of the act.
No error.