Court Opinion

ID: 4081648
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-10-07 23:28:12.181634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:34:57.289790
License: Public Domain

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
             Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1124
CA 14-02060
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF GAIL MURTAUGH, INDIVIDUALLY
AND DOING BUSINESS AS CROSBY HILL AUTO RECYCLING,
RICHARD R. MURTAUGH AND MURTAUGH RECYCLING CORP.,
PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

                      V                                             ORDER

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSERVATION AND DENISE M. SHEEHAN, COMMISSIONER,
RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
(APPEAL NO. 1.)

BRICKWEDDE LAW FIRM, SYRACUSE (KEVIN C. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR
PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATHLEEN M. ARNOLD OF
COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

     Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County
(Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 22, 2014 in a proceeding
pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, among other things, denied
petitioners’ cross motion to dismiss the counterclaims.

     It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed
without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d
985, 985).

Entered:    December 23, 2015                   Frances E. Cafarell
                                                Clerk of the Court