Court Opinion

ID: 7499485
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:22:03.297013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:14.737186
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The revocation of appellants’ probation is affirmed, but we remand for deletion of the finding that appellant Brooks violated the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision from the order revoking his probation. Appellant Brooks did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.