Court Opinion

ID: 1006637
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:14:08.759102+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:59.335817
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7737

JAMES D. RICH,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DOTSON,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-658)

Submitted:   February 5, 2002          Decided:     February 13, 2002

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Rich, Appellant Pro Se.    Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James D. Rich seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Rich v. Dotson, No. CA-00-658

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2001).   We deny Rich’s motion for appointment

of counsel and his motion to compel.   We also deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis.    We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2