Court Opinion

ID: 47724
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 23:28:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:43.629230
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-41134
                        Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHANE RAY DOESCHER,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                     USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Shane Ray Doescher has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).   Doescher has

responded to counsel’s motion, moving for leave to file a

“controlling supplemental amendment.”   Doescher has also moved

this court to reconsider its previous without-prejudice denial of

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and he has filed two motions for

the appointment of counsel.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 05-41134
                                -2-

     Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Doescher’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.   All other

motions are DENIED.