Court Opinion

ID: 994004
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:16:24.460243+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:37.196922
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6913

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

STACY NEVIN APPLE, a/k/a Satchel Pomme, a/k/a
Stacey Apple,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.   Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CR-88-174-H, CA-97-1183-H)

Submitted:   October 21, 1997             Decided:   January 22, 1998

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy Nevin Apple, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Apple, Nos. CR-88-174-H; CA-97-1183-H (D.
Md. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2