Court Opinion

ID: 6336107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-04-28 18:00:25.444845+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:07.403757
License: Public Domain

Case: 21-20641     Document: 00516298807         Page: 1     Date Filed: 04/28/2022

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                                                                       FILED
                                                                   April 28, 2022
                                  No. 21-20641
                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
                                Summary Calendar                       Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Raymond Guzman,

                                                         Defendant—Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:18-CR-738-1

   Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond
   Guzman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
   632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guzman has not filed a response. We have

          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-20641    Document: 00516298807          Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/28/2022

                                  No. 21-20641

   reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
   therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.

                                       2