Court Opinion

ID: 8445145
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-04 21:31:21.901678+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:54.125463
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Patricia Lee Greenway seeks to appeal from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting the motions to dismiss filed by four of the seven Defendants named in her amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Greenway seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.