Court Opinion

ID: 662265
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:18:14+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:24.950299
License: Public Domain

15 F.3d 1093NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Martin MIRANDA-SUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-10400.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 4, 1994.*Decided Jan. 12, 1994.

Before:  REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM**

2
Martin Miranda-Suarez appeals his 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326(a).  Pursuant to  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Miranda-Suarez's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review.  Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Our independent review of the record pursuant to  Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.  Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  9th Cir.R. 34-4

**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3