Court Opinion

ID: 1005786
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:01:19.453984+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:56.093607
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

CAMILLE FORD,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-94-163, CA-98-1206-2)

Submitted:   October 18, 2001             Decided:   October 29, 2001

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Camille Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Ford, Nos. 94-163; CA-98-1206-2 (E.D.

Va. filed June 16, 2001; entered June 18, 2001).   We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2