Court Opinion

ID: 4428398
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-08-20 19:06:06.502965+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:50:48.839132
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
                                 APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
     This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this
               opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

                                                           SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
                                                           APPELLATE DIVISION
                                                           DOCKET NO. A-3505-17T1

GEORGE RICE,

          Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

     Respondent-Respondent.
______________________________

                    Submitted May 7, 2019 – Decided June 4, 2019

                    Before Judges Hoffman and Geiger.

                    On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the Public
                    Employees' Retirement System, Department of the
                    Treasury, PERS No. 2-1282190.

                    George Rice, appellant pro se.

                    Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for
                    respondent (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney
                    General, of counsel; Thomas R. Hower, Deputy
                    Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM
      Appellant George Rice appeals from a final agency decision of respondent

Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS Board),

denying his request to purchase service credit from September 20, 1986 to April

30, 2005. We affirm.

      Appellant was hired by Cumberland County on October 11, 1983 as a

temporary employee. He was continuously employed by the County in various

temporary positions at least partially funded pursuant to the Job Training

Partnership Act (JTPA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1501 to 1792b, and its successor

program, the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2801 to 2945,

until the County passed a resolution, effective May 1, 2005, which converted

appellant to a regular County employee. Appellant then became a member of

the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS).

      On May 10, 2010, appellant submitted an application with the Division of

Pensions and Benefits (the Division) to purchase service credit for October 11,

1983 through April 30, 2005. The Division informed appellant he was only

eligible to purchase service credit for his temporary employment from the time

of his original employment in 1983 until the enactment of L. 1986, c. 109, which

became effective September 19, 1986. Chapter 109 provided:

                  A temporary employee who is employed under
            the [JTPA] shall not be eligible for [PERS] membership

                                                                         A-3505-17T1
                                       2
            . . . . Membership for temporary employees employed
            under the [JTPA] who are in the system on the effective
            date of this 1986 amendatory act shall be terminated,
            and affected employees shall receive a refund of their
            accumulated deductions as of the date of
            commencement of employment in a [JTPA] program.
            Such refund of contributions shall serve as a waiver of
            all benefits payable to the employee, to his dependent
            or dependents, or to any of his beneficiaries under the
            retirement system.

            [Ibid.]

Chapter 109, codified at N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(h), was subsequently amended to

bar membership of temporary employees employed under the WIA. L. 2007, c.

92.

      The PERS Board affirmed the determination of the Division, and voted to

deny appellant's request to purchase service credit for the period from September

20, 1986 through April 30, 2005. The PERS Board also affirmed the Division's

decision to allow appellant to purchase service credit for the period from

October 11, 1983 through September 19, 1986.

      Appellant appealed the PERS Board's decision and the matter was

transferred to the Office of Administrative Law as a contested case.          The

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) affirmed the PERS Board's decision. The ALJ

found appellant's request to purchase service credit for the period from

September 20, 1986 through April 30, 2005 was barred by N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(h)

                                                                          A-3505-17T1
                                        3
and our decision in Lewis v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement

System, 366 N.J. Super. 411 (App. Div. 2004). The PERS Board voted to adopt

the ALJ's decision with minor factual modifications.

      Notwithstanding N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(h) and our decision in Lewis,

appellant argues his request to purchase service credit is authorized by N.J.S.A.

43:15A-7(b), which provides, in relevant part, that any "temporary employee

with at least one year's continuous service" is a PERS member. We disagree.

      Judicial "review of administrative agency action is limited.              'An

administrative agency's final quasi-judicial decision will be sustained unless

there is a clear showing that it is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or that

it lacks fair support in the record.'" Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's

Ret. Sys., 206 N.J. 14, 27 (2011) (quoting In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27-28

(2007)). We "afford substantial deference to an agency's interpretation of a

statute that the agency is charged with enforcing." Richardson v. Bd. of Trs.,

Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 192 N.J. 189, 196 (2007) (citing R & R Mktg.,

LLC v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 (1999)). "Such deference has

been specifically extended to state agencies that administer pension statutes,"

because "a state agency brings experience and specialized knowledge to its task

of administering and regulating a legislative enactment within its field of

                                                                            A-3505-17T1
                                         4
expertise." Piatt v. Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 443 N.J. Super. 80, 99 (App.

Div. 2015) (quoting In re Election Law Enf't Comm'n Advisory Op. No. 01-

2008, 201 N.J. 254, 262 (2010)).

        In Lewis, we confronted the interplay between N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(b) and

N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(h) and concluded "the PERS Board correctly interpreted and

applied subsections (b) and (h) of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7 by recognizing the

supremacy of the latter." 366 N.J. Super. at 420.      Lewis was continually

employed by Salem County in various temporary positions pursuant to the JTPA

and its precursor, the Comprehensive Employment Training Act, 29 U.S.C.A.

§§ 801 to 999, from 1974 until the County passed a resolution in 1993, which

made his position permanent. Id. at 414. After Lewis retired, he applied to

"purchase prior service credit to augment his pension." Ibid. Although the

PERS Board allowed Lewis "to purchase credit for his temporary employment

from the time of his original employment in 1974 until the enactment of

subsection (h) in 1986," ibid. n.3, it "prohibited the purchase of additional

service credit for the period between September 19, 1986 and April 1, 1993 ,"

ibid.

        The PERS Board based its decision on N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(h). Ibid. Lewis

argued his right to purchase prior service credit was governed by N.J.S.A.

                                                                        A-3505-17T1
                                       5
43:15A-7(b). Id. at 415. This court "carefully considered the language and

purposes" of subsections (b) and (h), including comments made by then-

Governor Kean when he returned the original version of Chapter 109 to the

Legislature unsigned, 1 and held "the broader class of employees contained in

subsection (b) was intended to be limited by the more specific, narrower subset

of employees described in subsection (h)." Id. at 415, 420.

      We see no reason to depart from our decision in Lewis. We conclude that

the PERS Board correctly interpreted and applied subsections (b) and (h) of

N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7 in determining appellant could not purchase service credit

during the period his temporary positions were at least partially funded under

the JTPA or WIA.

      Appellant's arguments lack sufficient merit to warrant further discussion.

R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

      Affirmed.

1
  We noted Governor Kean refused to sign the original version of Chapter 109,
which allowed JTPA employees the option of PERS membership. Id. at 419 n.6.
We found it significant that the final version of Chapter 109 signed into law
contained a blanket exclusion on PERS membership for JTPA employees. Id.
at 419.
                                                                         A-3505-17T1
                                       6