Court Opinion

ID: 3122221
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:20:49.275483+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:14.035007
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00344-CV

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

                        THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                           CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

                   IN RE: ROLANDO CASTRO
____________________________________________________________

               On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
____________________________________________________________

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza
                        Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

         On June 29, 2010, relator, Rolando Castro, filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

On July 7, 2010, the Court requested that the real party in interest, Transmontaigne, Inc.,

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Relator has now filed a motion to

dismiss this original proceeding. According to the motion to dismiss, the parties have

compromised and settled their differences.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and relator’s motion to dismiss

this original proceeding, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

         1
         See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2.8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay h and d ow n a n o pinion b ut is
not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).
this original proceeding is DISMISSED without reference to the merits thereof. Pending

motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                    PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
7th day of September, 2010.

                                           2