Court Opinion

ID: 9669755
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 03:09:00.142535+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:16:00.125253
License: Public Domain

Taylor, J.
(concurring). I concur with the majority’s opinion and write to indicate that affirmance of the trial court’s order was also appropriate on the basis that the restrictions in the deeds for the lots (including lot 12) were in the nature of negative reciprocal easements. See, e.g., Webb v Smith (After Remand), 204 Mich App 564, 572-573; 516 NW2d 124 (1994); Parcells v Burton, 20 Mich App 457, 460-461; 174 NW2d 151 (1969).