Court Opinion

ID: 9372128
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-17 21:02:25.490472+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:33.269802
License: Public Domain

Filed 2/17/23 P. v. Wilson CA1/2
Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court
                  NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or
ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

         IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                     FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                   DIVISION TWO

 THE PEOPLE,
             Plaintiff and Respondent,
                                                                        A161420
 v.
 ALPHONSO RAY WILSON JR.,                                               (Solano County
                                                                         Super. Ct. No. VCR187924)
             Defendant and Appellant.

         On December 21, 2022, the Supreme Court transferred this matter to
this court with instructions to vacate our decision and reconsider the cause in
light of People v. Strong (2022) 13 Cal.5th 698.1 The opinion issued by this
court on March 28, 2022, is hereby vacated. Having reconsidered the appeal
in light of Strong, we conclude that appellant has adequately pleaded a prima
facie case for resentencing relief under Penal Code section 1172.6 and that
nothing in the record of conviction conclusively refutes the pleaded
allegations. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying
appellant’s resentencing petition. The trial court is directed to issue an order

        As stated in our order filed January 24, 2023, this court learned of the
         1

order transferring this matter to this court on January 24, 2023. On that
date we immediately issued an order giving the parties an opportunity to
submit a supplemental brief pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule
8.200(b). The time has passed for the parties to file supplemental briefs.
(See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.200(b)(1).) No briefs were filed.

                                                               1
to show cause under section 1172.6, subdivision (c), and to proceed with a
hearing under section 1172.6, subdivision (d).

                                           _________________________
                                           Miller, J.

WE CONCUR:

_________________________
Richman, Acting P.J.

_________________________
Markman, J.*

A161420, People v. Wilson

      Judge of the Alameda Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice
      *

pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

                                       2