Court Opinion

ID: 9865948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-25 23:51:53.897929+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:08:11.521691
License: Public Domain

THOMPSON, J.
The sole question presented in this case is whether the tax imposed by Act No. 4 of the Legislature at its extra session in 1928 is a property or a license tax.
In the case of the Fleischmann Co. v. Conway (No. 29808 on the docket of this court), 122 So. 845,1 we held, in an opinion this day handed down, that the tax was not a property tax but a license tax.
For the reasons assigned in that case the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

 Ante, p. 547.