Court Opinion

ID: 1014474
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 21:17:27.074777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:42:47.310962
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
 

  Boyce Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying in part his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See United States v. Coleman,
  
  No. CR-95-75 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED