Court Opinion

ID: 7357463
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-26 04:54:31.029484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:20:29.436089
License: Public Domain

SHEARN, J.
Judgment for plaintiff, rendered by the court without a jury, for $246, in an action for conversion.
[1] Appellant borrowed $400 from one Marburger, giving him a promissory note, payable four months after date, for $425, and delivering to him as collateral security a warehouse receipt for certain fur-lined coats. Thereafter $125 was paid on account, and a new note for $325 was executed and delivered. No other consideration than the $400 was received by appellant for the two notes, each of which was therefore usurious.
[2] On January 12, 1912, Marburger sold to plaintiff 30 of the fur-lined coats, which were in a warehouse under a nonnegotiable receipt, and gave him three orders on the warehousemen for the delivery of the fur-lined coats to him, in lots of 10 each. Twenty of the coats had been delivered to the plaintiff without notice to the appellant, when on or about January 12, 1912, appellant’s agent went to Marburger to make a payment on the note for $325, which was then overdue. On that day appellant was informed by Marburger that he had sold the coats, whereupon appellant notified the warehouse-men and claimed title to the coats. The warehousemen refused to deliver to the plaintiff the balance of the coats, and an action against them for conversion was begun. Appellant was thereafter made a party to the action on motion of the warehousemen.
The transaction between the appellant and Marburger was void for usury. Marburger never obtained title to the fur-lined coats, and was therefore never in a position to pass title to the plaintiff. Two judgments were entered, one indorsed on the papers on January 19, 1914, and the subsequent one, which in effect amended the original judgment, on January 24, 1914.
Accordingly the judgment of January 19, 1914, as amended by the judgment of January 24, 1914, is reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed upon the merits, with costs, as to the defendant Lowenthal, and judgment affirmed as to the defendant Revillon Fréres, without costs. All concur.