Court Opinion

ID: 9832052
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 21:34:38.495305+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:41.540153
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
We have again considered the question presented and discussed on original hearing, and think that, whatever force should be ascribed to the authorities cited in behalf of appellant on his motion for rehearing, we must adhere to the conclusions originally announced, particularly in view of the opinion of our Court of Criminal Appeals in the case of Ex parte Bradshaw, 70 Tex. Cr. R. 166, 159 S. W. 259, construing an ordinance very similar to the one attacked in this case.
[6] In answer to the suggestion that wa certify the question involved to the Supreme Court for its determination, we will add that it has been the ordinary practice of this court, in cases in which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction upon a writ of error, to decline to certify. See Day v. Mercer, 175 S. W. 764.
It is accordingly ordered that the motion for rehearing be overruled.