Court Opinion

ID: 3664162
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:14:44.028044+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:34.100316
License: Public Domain

The record proper was filed in this Court at the first term after the trial below and a certiorari asked for, as the case had not been settled by the judge. This was the proper course, and if the appellant was not in laches, the certiorari would issue. Owens v. Phelps, 91 N.C. 253; Pittmanv. Kimberly, 92 N.C. 562. In such case, as the trial judge (his HonorJudge Graves) has since died, a new trial would be ordered. S. v. Parks,107 N.C. 821; Brendle v. Reese, 115 N.C. 552. But in the present case the appellant does not negative laches. It appears that after the disagreement about settling the case, the appellant did not immediately request the judge to settle the case as required by section 550 of The Code, but delayed for several weeks to do so. This forfeits his claim to acertiorari for the reasons given in Simmons v. Andrews, 106 N.C. 201. An inspection of the record shows no errors of which the appellant can complain, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
Cited: McGowan v. Harris, 120 N.C. 140.