Court Opinion

ID: 9678590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 06:24:55.838119+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:05.982134
License: Public Domain

ON REHEARING
In then motion for rehearing, General Motors and Carter-Wood Motor Company complain because we state that the summary judgment as to “plaintiffs’ claims” is affirmed in part and reversed in part. They point out that only Thomas Ray Brewer, individually and as representative for the class members, has appealed. In using the term “plaintiffs’ ” we were referring to Brewer and the potential class members he represents. Our judgment applies only to Brewer and those potential class members as plaintiffs, and of course does not apply to the other originally named class representatives who did not appeal.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.