Court Opinion

ID: 9776180
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 19:21:41.675291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:32:35.279951
License: Public Domain

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellee has filed a petition to rehear relative to that portion of the lower court’s order that said, “Plaintiffs visitation privileges with the minor child shall not be coerced or forced by anyone against the minor child’s wishes.” Since this court’s opinion or order did not specifically reverse that part of the lower court’s order, the appellee seeks a clarification. It is the appellee’s position that a reversal of that portion of the order would require her to commit an assault and battery on her own child.
We reject the appellee’s alarmist position, but we accept the invitation to clarify this court’s judgment. It is therefore ordered as follows:
(1) This court’s judgment is herby amended to specifically reverse that part of the lower court’s order that says, “Plaintiffs visitation privileges with the minor child shall not be coerced or forced by anyone against the minor child’s wishes.”
(2) This court’s judgment is further amended to specifically state that the *710means of effectuating the mandate of this court are left to the discretion of the trial court.
Tax the costs relative to the petition to rehear to the appellee.
/s/ Ben H. Cantrell Ben H. Cantrell, Judge
/s/ William B. Cain William B. Cain, Judge
/s/ Henry F. Todd Henry F. Todd, Judge