Court Opinion

ID: 819943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-02-08 00:10:17.432395+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:03:01.557229
License: Public Domain

Case: 12-20184       Document: 00512138295         Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/07/2013

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 7, 2013
                                     No. 12-20184
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DIDERICO LOPEZ GONZALEZ, also known as Socrates Lopez, also known as
Diderico Lopez-Gonzalez, also known as Diderico Lopez-Gonzales, also known
as Socrates Gonzales Lopez, also known as Diderico Lopez Gonzales, also known
as Dederico Lopez Gonzales, also known as Socrates Lopez Gonzales,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-828-1

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Diderico Lopez
Gonzalez (Lopez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-20184    Document: 00512138295    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/07/2013

                                No. 12-20184

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2