Court Opinion

ID: 4464015
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-13 08:10:36.586613+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:33.386683
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
                         FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

                                           ORDER

Appellate case name:         Henry Rangel v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number:       01-18-00273-CR

Trial court case number:     CR13465

Trial court:                 355th District Court of Hood County1

        Appointed counsel, Lukas A. Lawrence, moved to withdraw from this appeal and
filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
744 (1967). Based on our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is an
arguable issue that counsel has not raised, namely the use of appellant’s prior conviction
for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, which is currently a state jail felony, to enhance
the sentencing range.
        When an appellate court determines that arguable grounds for appeal exist, we
“must abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court with orders to appoint other
counsel to present those and any other grounds that might support the appeal.” Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). When we “identify issues that counsel
on appeal should have addressed but did not, we need not be able to say with certainty that
those issues have merit; we need only say that the issues warrant further development by
counsel on appeal.” Wilson v. State, 366 S.W.3d 335, 337 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
2012, published order of abatement). Further, we must allow counsel that filed the Anders
brief to withdraw from the case. Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511.
       Accordingly, we strike appellate counsel’s Anders brief and grant counsel’s motion
to withdraw. Cf. Williams v. State, 976 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1998,
order) (striking counsel’s brief and removing him from the appeal); Marsh v. State, 959
S.W.2d 224, 226 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, order), disp. on merits, No. 05-92-00482-CR,

1      Pursuant to its docket equalization powers, the Texas Supreme Court transferred this
       appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas to this Court. See TEX.
       GOV’T CODE § 73.001; Misc. Docket No. 18-9049 (Tex. Mar. 27, 2018).
1998 WL 234202 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 12, 1998, no pet.) (same). Appointed counsel
shall immediately send the required notice and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of
this Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c).
       We further abate this appeal and remand the cause for the trial court to appoint
new appellate counsel.2 The trial court is ordered to inform this Court in writing of the
identity of new counsel and the date of appointment within 30 days of the date of this
order. Counsel’s brief will be due 30 days after the trial court makes its appointment.
This appeal will be reinstated after the notice of appointment is received by this Court.
      It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:    /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
                      Acting individually         Acting for the Court

Date: __December 12, 2019____

2     New appellate counsel should investigate the record and file a new brief for appellant.
      Counsel’s brief may either present an argument on the merits or a proper Anders brief and
      motion to withdraw, as determined by counsel after a conscientious examination of the
      record.

                                              2