Court Opinion

ID: 4102175
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-11-23 21:11:08.616371+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:34:30.972090
License: Public Domain

Markowits v Friedman (2016 NY Slip Op 07933)

Markowits v Friedman

2016 NY Slip Op 07933

Decided on November 23, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 23, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2015-04111
 (Index No. 502667/13)

[*1]Sara Markowits, et al., appellants, 
vBarry Friedman, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.

Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY (Joseph Covello and Kenneth L. Gartner of counsel), for appellants.
Morrison Cohen LLP, New York, NY (Y. David Scharf and Kristin T. Roy of counsel), for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated March 12, 2015, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Barry Friedman and Rachel Friedman which was, in effect, to direct the plaintiff Alexander Markowits to notify the arbitrator, by March 19, 2015, of dates available to appear for an arbitration during the weeks of April 16, 2015, or April 24, 2015.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, and so much of the order as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Barry Friedman and Rachel Friedman which was, in effect, to direct the plaintiff Alexander Markowits to notify the arbitrator, by March 19, 2015, of dates available to appear for an arbitration during the weeks of April 16, 2015, or April 24, 2015, is vacated.
In an order dated June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court granted, in part, a motion of various defendants to compel arbitration (see Markowits v Friedman, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2014-08193; decided herewith]). The order appealed from here, in relevant part, in effect, granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Barry Friedman and Rachel Friedman (hereinafter together the Friedmans) which was, in effect, to direct the plaintiff Alexander Markowits to notify the arbitrator, by March 19, 2015, of dates available to appear for an arbitration during the weeks of April 16, 2015, or April 24, 2015. Since the order expired by its own terms during the pendency of this appeal, the appeal has been rendered academic (see Matter of Maurice M. [Norton], 138 AD3d 1119; Matter of Congregation Ahavas Moische, Inc. v Katzoff, 134 AD3d 933).
"While it is the general policy of New York courts to simply dismiss an appeal which has been rendered academic, vacatur of an order or judgment on appeal may be an appropriate exercise of discretion where necessary  in order to prevent a judgment which is unreviewable for mootness from spawning any legal consequences or precedent'" (Mannino v Wells Fargo Home [*2]Mtge., Inc., 120 AD3d 638, 639, quoting Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 718; see Matter of Adirondack Moose Riv. Comm. v Board of Black Riv. Regulating Dist., 301 NY 219; E-Z Eating 41 Corp. v H.E. Newport L.L.C., 84 AD3d 401; Funderburke v New York State Dept. of Civ. Serv., 49 AD3d 809). Here, the plaintiffs are correct that the Supreme Court lacked the authority to direct Alexander Markowits to participate in the arbitration, since the order compelling arbitration merely precludes Alexander Markowits from proceeding in the action (see CPLR 7506[b], [c]; Marillo v Shearson Hayden Stone, 159 AD2d 1012). Further, the subject portion of the order could spawn adverse legal consequences for Markowits should the defendants seek to hold him in contempt for failing to comply with it. Accordingly, we vacate so much of the order as granted that branch of the Friedmans' motion which was, in effect, to direct Alexander Markowits to notify the arbitrator, by March 19, 2015, of dates available to appear for an arbitration during the weeks of April 16, 2015, or April 24, 2015.
BALKIN, J.P., HALL, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court