Court Opinion

ID: 9458961
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 21:06:34.185179+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:35:57.815854
License: Public Domain

BELL, Circuit Judge
(specially concurring) :
I concur in the result of this case and in the principle which it sets out that is applicable to hair style regulations at *665the college level, a principle different from that applying below the college level. See Karr v. Schmidt, 5 Cir., 1972, 460 F.2d 609 (En banc). A legislative judgment of the kind involved here is inescapable for the court, given civil rights jurisdiction, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, the inability to require exhaustion of state remedies, Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961), and the class action rule, Rule 23, F.R. Civ.Procedure.