Court Opinion

ID: 9543899
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 16:50:17.278951+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:11:25.642929
License: Public Domain

OPINION ON REHEARING
HOFFMAN, J.
On rehearing respondent-appellant Kenneth Deahl correctly notes that the previous opinion on this matter mistakenly stated that, pursuant to a motion to correct errors, the trial court altered the valuation of one transfer and included an additional $3,525.00 in the estate's assets. Instead the court altered the valuation of the transfer but concluded that the entire value of the asset should be excluded from the estate's assets thereby reducing the assets "by $3,800.00 plus interest." The petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied.
GARRARD, P.J., and SULLIVAN, J., concur.