Court Opinion

ID: 3069355
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 00:08:51.385264+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:49.880955
License: Public Domain

In The

                                Court of Appeals
                    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
                           ____________________
                              NO. 09-14-00545-CV
                           ____________________

                      CHARLES RAY MASON, Appellant

                                         V.

                            TINA D. ROAN, Appellee
_______________________________________________________            ______________

                    On Appeal from the 411th District Court
                             Polk County, Texas
                         Trial Cause No. CIV23935
________________________________________________________             _____________

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

      On December 16, 2014, Charles Ray Mason filed a notice of appeal. On

December 17, 2014, we notified Mason that the time for perfecting an appeal ran

from the date of the trial court’s order dismissing the suit for want of prosecution,

and we questioned our jurisdiction. Mason filed a reply to our letter in which he

alleges that the trial court signed an order dismissing the case for want of

prosecution on December 9, 2011. Mason stated in “Plaintiff’s Verified Motion to

Reinstate” which was filed on or about October 28, 2014, that he first received

                                         1
notice that the case had been dismissed in October 2014. On December 5, 2014,

the trial court signed an order denying Mason’s motion to reinstate. Mason argues

that this Court has jurisdiction to hear his appeal because he contends he timely

filed his notice of appeal after the December 5, 2014 order denying his motion to

reinstate. We disagree.

      The time for filing a notice of appeal runs from the date of the dismissal

order, not the date the trial court rules on a motion to reinstate. Hartford Ins. Grp.

v. Perez, No. 05-11-00195-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4460, at *2 (Tex. App.—

Dallas June 13, 2011, no pet.); Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Houston, 988
S.W.2d 437, 438 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied). Mason failed

to perfect an appeal by filing a notice of appeal within the time permitted for either

a regular or a restricted appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. We dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction.

      APPEAL DISMISSED.

                                              ________________________________
                                                      LEANNE JOHNSON
                                                           Justice

Submitted on January 21, 2015
Opinion Delivered January 22, 2015

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
                                          2