Court Opinion

ID: 22084
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-25 07:51:46+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:30.565875
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                              FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                               _____________________

                                    No. 00-40253
                                  Summary Calendar
                               _____________________

      RAIMUND PUZONIA,

                                                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                         versus

      ESSILOR OF AMERICA,

                                                       Defendant-Appellee.

          _______________________________________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court for
                           the Eastern District of Texas
                            (USDC No. 4:99-CV-164)
          _______________________________________________________
                               September 28, 2000

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

      *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
      Appellant Raimund Puzonia agues that the replacement of his penile

prosthesis was a medical necessity and therefore covered under the Essilor of

America, Inc. medical plan. We agree with the district court that the record shows

that the costs of replacement were “charges in connection with the treatment of

sexual dysfunction” and were therefore excluded from coverage.

      AFFIRMED.