Court Opinion

ID: 7477457
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 03:50:37.324554+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:56.158279
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
As to appellant’s attack upon the constitutionality of F.S. 39.02(5) (c), we affirm on authority of Johnson v. State, Sup.Ct. Fla.1974, 314 So.2d 573 and Davis v. State, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1974, 297 So.2d 289.
Appellant’s second point is an attack upon the taped confession. We find that point to be without merit, finding that the authorities substantially met the require*249ments of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 469, 470, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
Affirmed.
BOYER, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.
RAWLS, J., dissents.