Court Opinion

ID: 7778464
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:07:40.593511+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:10.080212
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Although the trial court erred in relying on the clerk’s docket as part of the record, Clark v. State, 851 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA *7062003), the summary denial of the appellant’s postconviction motion is affirmed because the motion is facially insufficient. State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur.