Court Opinion

ID: 7417359
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:38:02.136801+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:17.269366
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 1, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.