Court Opinion

ID: 9363056
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-01-13 17:02:48.034194+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:28.230317
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    SHAWN D. DANIELS,                           §
                                                §   No. 287, 2022
           Defendant Below,                     §
           Appellant,                           §
                                                §   Court Below–Superior Court
           v.                                   §   of the State of Delaware
                                                §
    STATE OF DELAWARE,                          §
                                                §   Cr. ID No. 1509003025 (N)
           Appellee.                            §

                               Submitted: November 7, 2022
                               Decided:   January 12, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.

                                            ORDER

         After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment below should

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior Court’s July

13, 2022 order clarifying its January 31, 2022 order and denying the appellant’s

motion for reargument.1 The appellant is not serving an illegal sentence.

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm be

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.

                                       BY THE COURT:
                                       /s/ Gary F. Traynor
                                       Justice

1
    State v. Daniels, 2022 WL 2733509 (Del. Super. Ct. July 13, 2022).