Court Opinion

ID: 2942542
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 23:34:44.876136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:58:15.350714
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                        OF TEXAS
                         NOS. AP-76,082, AP-76,083 & AP-76,084

                       EX PARTE RICARDO FALCON Applicant

              ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
                CAUSE NOS. 04-53106-V; 04-53108-V & 04-53109-V
                        IN THE 292 ND DISTRICT COURT
                          FROM DALLAS COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                         OPINION

       Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty without a plea

agreement, was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment for each cause.

The Fifth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeals for lack of jurisdiction. Falcon v. State, Cause

Nos. 05-05-1184; 05-05-1185 & 05-05-1186-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas, delivered September 22, 2005).
                                                                                                        2

        Applicant contends that his sentences are illegal because he was not present when his

sentence was pronounced.

        Sentence must be pronounced in the defendant’s presence. U.S. CONST . amend. IV; XIV.

The record indicates that Applicant was not present when the trial court pronounced sentence against

him. The State and the trial court agree that Applicant was not present and that his due process

rights were violated by the trial court sentencing Applicant in absentia. Applicant is entitled to relief.

        Relief is granted. The sentences in Cause Nos. 04-53106-V; 04-53108-V & 04-53109-V in

the 292nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the

custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County to have sentence pronounced in his presence. Applicant’s

other grounds are dismissed.

        Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: January 28, 2009
Do Not Publish