Court Opinion

ID: 4920456
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-22 00:16:59.604178+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:02.506497
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
Appellee brought a bill for divorce against appellant, alleging three statutory grounds, viz., desertion, extreme cruelty and habitual indulgence in violent and ungovernable temper. The defendant wife asked for alimony and by answer denied the charges against her. Voluminous testimony' was taken.' The chancellor granted a divorce to the husband and awarded four of the children to him, decreeing also an allowance of thirty dollars per month to the wife for the support of the other two children committed to her care and custody. Alimony was denied. The defendant wife appealed and contends here that the decree is erroneous in granting the divorce on the testimony, and in refusing alimony.
*52There is substantial evidence warranting a decree of divorce. Upon the authority of Carlton v. Carlton, 78 Fla. 252, 83 South. Bep. 87,. the decree granting the divorce is affirmed; and the decree as to an allowance to the appellant for the support of two children committed to her care is also affirmed. But the decree denying alimony is reversed and the matter of appropriate provision for the support of the appellant is reserved to the lower court for proper action should the circumstances of the case warrant it.
It is so ordered.
Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.
Ellis, J., dissents.