Court Opinion

ID: 4029262
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-08-29 07:28:19.474391+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:48:17.700171
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 25 2016.

                                     In The

                    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

                              NO. 14-15-00592-CR

                    TYLER ALLEN PROCTOR, Appellant

                                       V.
                      THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                   On Appeal from the 405th District Court
                          Galveston County, Texas
                      Trial Court Cause No. 14CR1850

                 MEMORANDUM                     OPINION

      Appellant Tyler Allen Proctor appeals his conviction for possession of a
controlled substance with intent to deliver. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a
brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The
brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by
presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are
no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

      A copy of counsel’s brief and the record were delivered to appellant.
Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se
response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As
of this date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

      We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief
or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

      Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

                                       PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

                                         2