Court Opinion

ID: 9398192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-30 16:08:16.177578+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:19:31.639907
License: Public Domain

People v Blanco (2023 NY Slip Op 02851)

People v Blanco

2023 NY Slip Op 02851

Decided on May 30, 2023

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: May 30, 2023

Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, JJ. 

Ind. No. 1928/94 Appeal No. 335 Case No. 2016-1358 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
vJose Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Elliott R. Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find any overassessment of points, and the alleged mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his family situation, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by egregiousness of the underlying offense,
which indicates a danger that a reoffense would cause a high degree of harm.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 30, 2023