Court Opinion

ID: 8212890
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-10 00:13:27.745785+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:42:14.204292
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                        NO. WR-90,121-02

                        EX PARTE ANTONIO CHIMNEY, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                 CAUSE NO. 22-9640-W2 IN THE 12TH DISTRICT COURT
                             FROM MADISON COUNTY

       Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

       Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Tenth Court

of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Chimney v. State, 6 S.W.3d 681 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999).

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

       Applicant contends that he is actually innocent and that trial counsel was ineffective because

he failed to investigate and present evidence of an alternate shooter. As part of the record in writ

number 90,121-01, which this Court dismissed as non-compliant in 2019, Applicant provided an

affidavit from Roshaan Perry stating that he was the person who shot the victims in this case and that

Applicant did not have a gun on the night of the incident. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true,
                                                                                                       2

might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim.

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, considering

the totality of the circumstances, the common-law doctrine of laches bars equitable relief in this case.

Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court shall also make findings

of fact and conclusions of law as to whether there is new evidence sufficient to show that Applicant

is actually innocent of this offense and whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and

Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
                          3

Filed: OCTOBER 05, 2022
Do not publish