Court Opinion

ID: 9681952
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 08:01:58.906431+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:36.024472
License: Public Domain

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the result which affirms the conviction and reverses in part the fixing of sentence. However, I must respectfully disagree with that part of the opinion which relates to an analysis of double jeopardy and the so-called criminal impulse. As I have stated in my dissents in Walden v. Commonwealth, Ky., 805 S.W.2d 102 (1991) and Ingram v. Commonwealth, Ky., 801 S.W.2d 321 (1990), I believe the majority has misconceived the application of Grady v. Corbin and has confused multiple punishment with successive punishment in those cases.