Court Opinion

ID: 2889552
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 20:21:05.507398+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:31:45.650214
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-00-0490-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JANUARY 8, 2003

______________________________

MARK ANTHONY BERNAL, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 743691; HONORABLE BRIAN RAINS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. (1)
MEMORANDUM OPINION (2)
	Pursuant to a plea bargain for aggravated sexual assault of a child, appellant was
granted deferred adjudication and placed on community supervision for ten years.  Upon
the State's motion to proceed with an adjudication of guilt, appellant plead true to the
allegations and the trial court adjudicated him guilty and sentenced him to ten years
confinement and a $500 fine.  By two points of error, appellant asserts the trial court
committed reversible error in assessing a ten-year sentence because it was not
proportional to the offense committed and violated his federal and state rights against cruel
and unusual punishment.
	We hold that appellant did not preserve his complaints for appellate review. 
Although article 42.12, section 5(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure permits an
appeal from assessment of punishment after an adjudication of guilt, it is still necessary
to object at the time punishment is assessed to preserve the complaint.  See Tex. R. App.
P. 33.1(a)(1)(A); see also Hardeman v. State, 1 S.W.3d 689, 690 (Tex.Cr.App. 1999). 
Appellant did not object to the court's assessment of a ten-year sentence.  Thus, his
complaint is waived.  Appellant's points of error are overruled.
	Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
							Per Curiam
Do not publish.
1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.
2. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.