Court Opinion

ID: 8458220
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 05:02:23.967136+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:06.229127
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamar Luster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Luster, No. 2:03-cr-00288-1, 2008 WL 4821300 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 4, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.