Court Opinion

ID: 2933265
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-15 02:40:20.428662+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:52.119333
License: Public Domain

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5, 2007

Affirmed
and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5, 2007.
 
In The
 
Fourteenth Court of
Appeals
____________
 
NO. 14-06-00897-CR
____________
 
CHARLES SAMUEL BARBAR,
Appellant
 
V.
 
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 

 
On Appeal from the 248th District
Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No.
647429
 

 
M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N
This
appeal is from the trial court=s order of August 19, 2006, denying appellant=s request for DNA testing in cause
number 647429.  
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in
which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy
of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right
to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, more
than sixty days have elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have
carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in
the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence
of the state.
Accordingly,
the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
 
PER CURIAM
 
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 5,
2007.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Fowler, and
Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P.
47.2(b).