Court Opinion

ID: 9383270
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-03-30 01:02:34.284649+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:15:51.470743
License: Public Domain

Filed 3/29/23 P. v. Harrison CA1/3

                  NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or
ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

          IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                                DIVISION THREE

 THE PEOPLE,                                                            A165898
             Plaintiff and Respondent,
 v.                                                                     (Contra Costa County Super. Ct.
 PETER SCOTT HARRISON,                                                  No. 5000808303)
             Defendant and Appellant.

                                       MEMORANDUM OPINION
         Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the trial court recalled Peter Scott
Harrison’s sentence and resentenced him under former Penal Code section
1171.1 (now § 1172.75).1 Harrison appealed. His appointed counsel filed
a brief raising no issues and requesting this court conduct an independent
review of the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Harrison was
apprised of his right to file a supplemental brief but he has not filed

       We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to the
         1

California Standards of Judicial Administration, section 8.1. Undesignated
statutory references are to the Penal Code.

                                                               1
anything. We have independently reviewed the record for arguable issues.
Having found none, we affirm.
      In 2009, Harrison pled no contest to voluntary manslaughter and, as
relevant here, admitted serving five prior prison terms (§ 667.5, former
subd. (b)). The trial court imposed a stipulated sentence of 17 years in state
prison, which included mandatory one-year enhancements for each prison
prior. It ordered Harrison to pay a restitution fine and a court security fee,
and it imposed and suspended a parole revocation fine.
      In July 2022 — and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation — the trial
court recalled the sentence and resentenced Harrison pursuant to section
1172.75. It struck the five one-year enhancements imposed under section
667.5, former subdivision (b) and reduced his sentence to 12 years. The
court, however, rejected defense counsel’s request to dismiss the “fines and
fees still attached to the case.” Harrison appealed.
      We have examined the record and conclude there are no arguable
issues. (People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, 233; People v. Wende,
supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
                                DISPOSITION
      The judgment is affirmed.

                                       2
                                _________________________
                                Rodríguez, J.

WE CONCUR:

_________________________
Tucher, P. J.

_________________________
Fujisaki, J.

A165898

                            3