Court Opinion

ID: 5759822
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:12:35.855403+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:31.108630
License: Public Domain

Order entered on June 23, 1966, on motion to stay arbitration, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by striking out all ordering paragraphs and ordering in lieu thereof that the arbitration proceed in accord with the notice served, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant. Special Term found that respondent was entitled to proceed to arbitration but found fault with the demand for arbitration. The court then directed that a new notice be served, provided for the service of an answer by appellant, and stayed proceedings in two actions instituted by appellant. The arbitration was sought in regard to transactions in a corporation, of which the parties are stockholders, pursuant to a stockholders’ agreement providing for arbitration. The actions concern another corporation and a partnership in which the parties have interests, but there are no applicable agreements to arbitrate the disputes which may arise between the parties in regard to these entities. As a consequence, respondent could not be compelled to arbitrate in regard to them, nor could it be made a condition to her right to arbitrate the dispute as to which there was an agreement. This being so, there is no occasion for staying the actions instituted. Nor are there any grounds for requiring the service of papers in the nature of pleadings in an arbitration proceeding other than those provided by statute or by the agreement to arbitrate. Motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal dismissed, without costs, having become academic by virtue of 'the decision of this court, decided herewith. Concur —Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.