Court Opinion

ID: 9890935
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-16 21:00:54.164646+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:50:02.621062
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 23-13107   Document: 9-1     Date Filed: 10/16/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                 In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                              No. 23-13107
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      CRAIG CUNNINGHAM,
                                                    Plaintiﬀ-Appellant,
      versus
      YAKIM JORDAN,
      MJ MINISTRIES SPREADING THE GOSPEL, INC.,
      MJ MINISTRIES, LLC,
      STEVEN SLEDGE,
      AARON JORDAN, et al.,

                                                Defendants-Appellees.

                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13107     Document: 9-1     Date Filed: 10/16/2023     Page: 2 of 2

      2                      Opinion of the Court                23-13107

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Georgia
                    D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-01419-WMR
                          ____________________

      Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, AND LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Craig Cunningham, proceeding pro se, appeals from the dis-
      trict court’s order denying his motion for subpoenas and its order
      granting ten defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The or-
      ders are not final and appealable, however, because the district
      court has not resolved the rights and liabilities of MJ Ministries,
      LLC and did not certify the orders for immediate appeal. See 28
      U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Acheron Cap., Ltd. v.
      Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022); Supreme Fuels Trading
      FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.