Court Opinion

ID: 4270019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-04-26 00:00:22.604169+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:51:15.333435
License: Public Domain

Case: 17-10989      Document: 00514445747         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/25/2018

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 17-10989                            April 25, 2018
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS CORTEZ ZENDEJAS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:16-CR-15-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Cortez
Zendejas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cortez Zendejas has filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein, as well as Cortez Zendejas’s response.              We agree with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10989      Document: 00514445747   Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/25/2018

                                 No. 17-10989

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                       2