Court Opinion

ID: 685925
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 03:33:22+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:26.391365
License: Public Domain

43 F.3d 1466
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Sidney A. HENRY, Plaintiff Appellant,v.CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA;  Debra Jones Hill, Witness forState;  Marilyn A. Sallee;  Roberta P. Boyle,Commonwealth Attorney;  Karl Morrisette,Detective, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6713.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted November 17, 1994.Decided December 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.  Robert G. Doumar, District Judge.  (CA-92-26-2)
Sidney A. Henry, Appellant Pro Se.  Stuart E. Katz, Nancy Bennett Cherry, City Attorney's Office, Portsmouth, VA;  Sterling Harrisbe Weaver, Sr., Portsmouth, VA;  Mark Douglas Stiles, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, VA, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Henry v. City of Portsmouth, No. CA-92-26-2 (E.D. Va.  May 13, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED