Court Opinion

ID: 9815822
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 02:27:25.22103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:35.091023
License: Public Domain

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
No. 3544. Decided May 19, 1943.
BY THE COURT:
We have before us a motion for rehearing and for a reconsideration of the court’s order heretofore made. There is also a request for oral hearing of the motion. Counsel has not been careful in following Rule XI providing for rehearing. Under such rule no motion can be made for rehearing. Applications for rehearing must be made in accordance with the rule. No argument of the cause on such application will be permitted. The “motion” of counsel simply reiterates the objections he has heretofore made to *637the judgment rendered by the court. This court had passed upon, all those questions, as appears in the opinion.
Application for rehearing denied, and request for oral hearing, likewise denied.
BARNES, P. J., HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ., concur.