Court Opinion

ID: 4061210
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-09-29 20:03:57.716268+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:32:04.658300
License: Public Domain

RECE|VED IN

Dr.. Alex Melvin Wade, Jr.

Paralegal Specialist ` CQURT OF CR!MINAL
Mark W. Stiles - APPEALS
3060 FM 3514 NO.
Beamnont, Texas 77705-7638 ‘/ 06 2015
No. wR-65,555-20
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Abe! q
UF TEXAS

AUSTIN, mds

x

ln Re: ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR. , § District Court No.:

Relator , § 1.222385-D
§ In the 185th ludic.ial District Court
§§ Harris County, Texas

RE'LA'I‘OR AJ_-EX-l"E`-I_-VIN WADE, J`R, , SUPPHME'.NT 'l"HE RE`.CORD
IN 'JI‘.M:'FP.ROCEEDING .,

'IC" 'lHF_. HI\II‘AH_E.JLSI`ICES T SAD CUE’.'[`:
Pelator Alex kelvin Wade, Jr., in the above entitled captioned caused , filed on
()ctober 26t , 2015 in this Court mentioned Order'Designating Issue (ODI) filed

in the 185th .Iudicial Distric_:t Court on March llth, 2014.

 

-Referenc.e made to the pleading is relevant to the non~c:o_n`§§ ij_nfc~ie issue
made as to the Couri;'_s C].er\.< failure to transmit the 'ODI to this Court once
signed by the Trial Court Judger, in this Case the Honorable Susan Brown.

Relator Alex Melvin {~?ade, Jr. ,»:x.'attaches a copy of the State's Moti.-;)n to Disignate
Issue and a copy of the proposed Order Designating Issue filed in the 185th
District Courr, that “was not transmitted to this Couri-§//S_'ne“/sgl”g#;}e_,;ir_by;:$usan:=»
'\.:.)/'

g 'e/ppe;iatm“€“ lzé"‘“* ~~
(see, Exhibit ,"A{_' & _','B" attach _er.e.to'\/,l .m“___

   
   
   

  

   
  
  

_ . ~_ex Melvin I~]ade, Jr.
_ar legal Specialist
`Mavl: W. Stiles

3060 FM 3514

Beamnon_t:, Texas 7`./`,705-,7638

CERTIFICATE OF SERVI-’_`£--
l, Dr. Alex Meivin wade, lr., pro se herein hereby certify aqtrue
and correct copy of the foreging sumhplemental proceeding has this 3rd
day of November 2015 been served upon the §§fice of the Honorable Devon Anderson
District Attorney, Harrisd County, Texas and the Honorable Chris Daniel,
Clerk of the Harris Connty, Texas District Court;j}£®l Franklin, 3rd

Floor, and the 6th Floor, District Attorneyfs 0 a

     

3rd day of November 2015.

 

am m PAGE @1

Z:W/)W/. gene

` 13/14/2@15 1.‘3:54

 

Cause No._ 12223 85~D

m .EX PARTE_ _ ~ § iN'IHEiSSTH DISTRICT coURT

OF

ALEX MELVIN WADE, Jié,, t '
Applicam § HARRIS coUN'rY, TEXAS

sTATE’s stencel MQUESTING-nnszennsmn-amsst@-

The State of Texas, by and through its Assistant District Attomey for Ham's
County, requests that this C6iu't, pursuant to TEX._ _CODE CRIM PROC. art. 11. 07,
§B(d), designate that the following issue needs to be resolved in the instant
proceeding 6 y

1 .Whether the applicant is actually innocent in the primary-case;
2.' ,,Whether the applicant received ineffective assistance of counsel in the
4 'Primary ease l

3 _Whether the evidence Was insufiicient to convict the applicant in the primary

-.-._...,.-__..__-. .. -.._ -»... . __ _,_,,__ __ ,_ _ _' _ _
"‘ l- ~ -_.__
..

,case;
, 4. Whether the State committed a Bredy violation` m the primary case; and

5 Whether the State allowed perjured evidence and false testimony in the

primary case .y'
RE._A'TOR EXHIBIT "A" .

 

PAGE 84

 

18/14/2@15 19:54

 

.*`?

Service has been accomplished by mailing a true and correct copy of the
foregoing instrument to the following address: `
Alex Melvin Wade, Jr.
#1624189 - Stiles Unit

3060 FM 351-.4
Beaumont, TX 77705

sIGNED this 11‘h day of March, 2014.

    

y
[~'~"" Andre\@g.d{
Assistant dstrict Attomey

Harris County, Texas
1201 Franklin, Suite 600
I-Iouston, Texas 77002
(713) 755-6657

Texas Bar I.D. #24048100

Prepared by:
Emily Patton

 

 

 

M F'AGE 32

   

- 13)"14»"2@15 192 54

Cause No. 12223 85-D

EX PARTE § 1N THa 185TH Disrmcr count
OF
ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., _
Applicant § HARRIS COUNTY, 'IEXAS
STA'll`E’S PROPOSED ORDER DESIGNATING ISS`UE
""“`“Having"réviewed`the applicants petition for Wn“t oi" habeas coi'pus, the _Court
finds that the following issue needs to be resolved in the instant proceeding:
1. Whether the applicant is actually innocent in the primary case;
2. Whether the applicant received ineffective assistance of counsel in the
primary case;
3. Whether the evidence was insufficient to convict the applicant in the primary
case;
4. Whether the State committed a Brady violation in the primaiy case; and

5. Whether the State allowed perjured evidence and false testimony in the

._' '---_.\..- --... :-' ---- 4
....-...._. »`_ ..

primary case.
Therefore, pursuant to Article 11.07, §3(d), this Court will resolve the

above-cited issues and then enter findings of fact.

RFT.._ATOR EXHIBI.T "B"

 

l@/l4f2815 19: 54

/
, \\

   

_M ' PAGE as

/ . ' rhe clerk sr the court is onl)EREn NoT to emma at this time any
/ documents in the above-styled case to the Court of Crirninal Appeals until further
order by this Coutt.

lBy the following signaturc, the Court adopts the
State’s Proposed Order Designating Issue in Cause No. 12_22385-D.

 

SIGNED onthe - day 6?~"- w h ' 16 n _"2`5`1_4: """" ' "

 

 

PRESIDING JUDGE

'- _-. _..

' ~-¢-- ~..-- -~-\nv~ -,W.,,_-._.. _` .

 

Case 4:11-cv-03514' roument 45-15 Filed »in TXSD on 08/29/12 \Page 1 of 51

 

Ot»/©»» aech -c/@

{ cAusE #1222385
185'" JunlclAL ols'rmc'r couR'r
ALEx wADE

` vs.
me s'rATE oF TExAs
VoLuME l
1sr couR'r oF APFEALS
y

 

 

cal '\1
,»~. ¢=~»
511 75 '
s s
se a
m ` c;\;;.
311 °’ "=r~
mg -° bc?
“ `D
Oc.~ Z': ~
Qr‘~ `O;?:
<:r- -_l` rn
100 ' ]':-
-~ic -~ t