Court Opinion

ID: 1004992
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:49:44.951361+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:17.893867
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ELIZABETH PAZ ELM,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-94-60, CA-00-650-3)

Submitted:   July 20, 2001                 Decided:   August 1, 2001

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Paz Elm, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Elizabeth Paz Elm seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court.   See United States v. Elm, Nos. CR-94-60; CA-

00-650-3 (W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 8, 2001; entered Jan. 9, 2001).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2