Court Opinion

ID: 8754109
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 11:38:56.006847+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:08.403035
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
This is a suit for a balance due for work done upon a naphtha launch belonging to Eopez, defendant in the court below, and appellant here, and for materials furnished in the course of the work. The total alleged cost of the material, work, etc., was $1,693. Payments on account and credits amounted to $803. The balance claimed was $889.61. The defendant claims that it was agreed and understood that the work was not to cost more than $1,000; that it was not good work; that the payments made, added to the amounts paid out, subsequent to the return of the boat by Collier, to have work done which should have been done by Collier, leave nothing due to libelant. There was a decree in favor of the libelant for $604.67, from which this appeal is taken.
*105The case presents simple questions of fact. The evidence is conflicting. Several witnesses testified for libelant, and proved up his case. They were contradicted by several witnesses produced by defendant to prove up his case. The testimony was all taken in presence of the trial judge, who thus had an opportunity to see the witnesses and observe their demeanor while testifying; and, on the evidence, we are not able to say that he reached an erroneous conclusion.
The decree appealed from is affirmed.