Court Opinion

ID: 9912888
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-12-25 08:09:32.283806+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:05:26.687487
License: Public Domain

In the
                   Court of Appeals
           Second Appellate District of Texas
                    at Fort Worth
                ___________________________
                     No. 02-23-00417-CV
                ___________________________

JEFF CRAWFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A J. CRAWFORD AGENCY;
  BLANDON BATTLES; ALISHA WILLIAMS; AND DEJONG ROBLOW,
                        Appellants

                                V.

          GRATEFUL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellee

             On Appeal from the 352nd District Court
                     Tarrant County, Texas
                 Trial Court No. 352-331577-22

              Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
                Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
                           MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Appellants Jeff Crawford, Individually and d/b/a J. Crawford Agency, Blandon

Battles,1 Alisha Williams, and Dejong Roblow attempt to appeal from a final

judgment entered against them on July 19, 2023. Appellants filed a timely motion for

new trial, then filed their notice of appeal on October 31, 2023.

       Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the date the

judgment is signed, but certain post-judgment motions can extend that deadline to

ninety days. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a) (“[T]he notice of appeal must be filed within

90 days after the judgment is signed if any party files . . . a motion for new trial[ or] a

motion to modify the judgment[.]”); see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b (stating that filing a

motion for new trial or motion to modify extends the trial court’s plenary power). An

appellate court may grant an additional fifteen-day extension of time to file the notice

of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex.

1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); see also Tex. R. App. P.

10.5(b) (motion requirements). Thus, in a typical civil case, a party who wishes to

appeal could take as long as 105 days from the date the judgment is signed to file a

notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3; Poard v. Webb, No. 02-22-00262-CV,

       1
        Appellants’ notice of appeal appears to be defective because all claims between
Appellee Grateful Development, LLC and Blandon Battles were severed from the
underlying case on January 23, 2023. We notified Appellants of the defect and
instructed them to file an amended notice of appeal that accurately lists the names of
each party filing the notice on or before November 17, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.1(d), (e), (g), 37.1. Appellants did not file an amended notice of appeal.

                                            2
2022 WL 3464863, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2022, no pet.) (per curiam)

(mem. op.); see also Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677 (citing former Rule 41(a)(2) of appellate

rules and holding motion for extension of time may be implied); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d

at 617 (citing former Rule 41(a)(2) and holding motion for extension of time is

necessarily implied when appellant, acting in good faith, files a document attempting

to perfect appeal beyond time allowed by appellate rules but within fifteen-day period

in which appellant would be entitled to move to extend filing deadline).

      Because Appellants timely filed a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was

due no later than October 17, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a); see also Tex. R. Civ. P.

329b(a) (“A motion for new trial . . . shall be filed prior to or within thirty days after

the judgment or other order complained of is signed.”). Appellants filed their notice

of appeal on October 31, 2023, within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule

26.3. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. Thus, a motion for

extension of time is necessarily implied. See Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677; Verburgt, 959

S.W.2d at 617. But Appellants were still required to provide a reasonable explanation

for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677;

Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. It is not enough to simply file a notice of appeal. 2 See

Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617.

      2
       On October 31, 2023, Appellants filed in the trial court, “Defendants Motion
to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal.” A trial court does not have the authority to
extend the notice-of-appeal deadline. N. Cent. Baptist Hosp. v. Chavez, No. 04-20-
00590-CV, 2021 WL 983351, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 17, 2021, no pet.)

                                            3
       We notified Appellants of our jurisdictional concern and instructed them to file

a response providing a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in

a timely manner. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 26.3(b). We warned Appellants that if

they did not file the response by November 17, 2023, we could dismiss this appeal for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellants did not file a response.

      Because Appellants did not provide a reasonable explanation for the failure to

file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also Jones, 976 S.W.2d at 677; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 615.

                                                       Per Curiam

Delivered: December 21, 2023

(mem. op.); Satterthwaite v. First Bank, No. 02-20-00182-CV, 2020 WL 4359400, at *1
(Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 30, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.); see Tex. R. App. P. 26.3(b)
(requiring that the motion to extend be filed in the appellate court). Notwithstanding
the express language of Rule 26.3, Appellants’ motion does not provide a reasonable
explanation—or any explanation—for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely
manner.

                                            4