Court Opinion

ID: 9824968
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 11:49:41.298226+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:06:08.874941
License: Public Domain

SAMFORD, J.
 The evidence for the state relative to the offense charged is:
“The defendant struck at Noah Pace with a stick * * * each time he was on the outside of my picket fence and I was on the inside, out of his reach.”
And again:
“When defendant hit at Noah Pace with á stick he was not standing close enough to hit him; in fact Noah was out of reach of him and that is why he did not hit him.”
An assault is an intentional attempt to strike, within striking distance, which fails of its intended effect either by preventive interference or by misadventure. Lane v. State, 85 Ala. 11, 4 So. 730. The defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence - should have been granted. . .
' The foregoing being .decisive of this appeal, other questions presented are not decided.
The evidence for the state showing as it does that no crime has been committed, -it could serve no good purpose to remand this *106cause. An order therefore will here be entered discharging the defendant.
Reversed and rendered.