Court Opinion

ID: 8354354
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-18 00:03:26.266587+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:45:54.329676
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

This court will not substitute its judgment on questions of fact for that of the commission. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 156 Ohio St., 282, 102 N. E. (2d), 246.

Order affirmed.

Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taft, JJ., concur.
Weygandt, C. J., not participating.