Court Opinion

ID: 9414278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-01 23:49:48.920084+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:54.578424
License: Public Domain

ORDER ON REHEARING
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion in this case is modified by replacing the following sentence, found at 343 F.3d 719, 731:
“We decline to resolve the ambiguity on appeal and, instead, remand for the parties to present extrinsic evidence supporting their interpretations of the agreement.”
with this:
“Regardless whether the clause is technically ambiguous, there are factual issues surrounding its application. These matters must be explored more fully.”
Further, in Footnote 10, the introductory clause, “In addition to the ambiguous contract language” is struck.
Otherwise, the opinion remains unchanged.
The petition for rehearing is, except to the foregoing extent, DENIED. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED, no member of the court having requested a poll.