Court Opinion

ID: 7490255
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:08:53.416093+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:07.056453
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
ADKINS, J., dissents with an opinion, with which SUNDBERG, J., concurs.