Court Opinion

ID: 3129273
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 16:18:49.420484+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:42:30.316649
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                             No. 04-10-00754-CV

      IN RE Trust Created Under the Last Will and Testament of Leslie Duncan MAURER

                           From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas
                                     Trial Court No. 2009-PC-3521
                            Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
                  Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
                  Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 29, 2010

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

           On July 6, 2010, the trial court signed a final judgment in this case. On July 23, 2010,

appellant filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, the notice

of appeal was due to be filed on October 4, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). And, a motion for

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 19, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.3. However, appellant did not file its notice of appeal until October 20, 2010. Similarly,

appellant did not file a motion for extension of time until October 20, 2010. 1

1
  In its motion to extend time, appellant clearly states that the notice of appeal and the motion to extend time were
filed on October 20, 2010. Likewise, the certificate of service on both the notice of appeal and motion to extend time
indicate that the notice of appeal and motion to extend time were forwarded to opposing counsel on October 20,
2010.
                                                                                  04-10-00754-CV

       A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the

period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no

longer invoke the appellate court=s jurisdiction.” Id.

       Because appellant’s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal was untimely filed,

we denied appellant’s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal on November 10, 2010.

And, because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed late and was not filed within the fifteen-day

grace period provided by Rule 26.3, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by November

29, 2010 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not

respond. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                   PER CURIAM

                                                 -2-