Court Opinion

ID: 8466981
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 09:54:20.767922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:14.165890
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Eustach appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eustach, No. 4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.