Court Opinion

ID: 2761248
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-12-16 19:01:26.709751+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T10:40:33.517378
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-40289      Document: 00512871386         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/16/2014

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 14-40289
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        December 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ENRIQUE LEIVA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:07-CR-564-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Carlos
Enrique Leiva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Leiva has filed a response and moves
for the appointment of new counsel. Although Leiva’s response raises claims
of ineffective assistance of counsel, those claims were not presented before the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40289      Document: 00512871386    Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/16/2014

                                  No. 14-40289

district court. We therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to
Leiva’s ability to raise the claims on collateral review. See United States v.
Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Leiva’s response.      We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, Leiva’s pro se motion for the appointment of new counsel is
DENIED, the FPD’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                        2