Court Opinion

ID: 568214
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:13+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:48.344582
License: Public Domain

944 F.2d 902
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.el A. NAVA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.L.W. HUFFMAN, Warden, L.W. Jarvis, Assistant Warden, MajorArmentrout, Chief of Security, Mark R. Davis,Assistant Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7650.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.Decided Sept. 13, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.  (CA-90-655-R)
Joel A. Nava, appellant pro se.
William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

1
Joel A. Nava appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.   Nava v. Huffman, CA-90-655-R (W.D.Va. July 8, 1991).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.