Court Opinion

ID: 993595
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:10:05.119291+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:54.989501
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-6977

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

AMOS HENRY JORDAN,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CR-93-2-BO, CA-95-18-4-BO)

Submitted:   November 6, 1997          Decided:     November 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Henry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-93-2-BO;
CA-95-18-4-BO (E.D.N.C. May 28, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2