Court Opinion

ID: 9962519
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-04-23 20:09:44.694566+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:18:59.977832
License: Public Domain

Bissesar v Time Warner Cable
               2024 NY Slip Op 31369(U)
                     April 19, 2024
           Supreme Court, New York County
        Docket Number: Index No. 161363/2017
                 Judge: James G. Clynes
Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
 Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York
 State and local government sources, including the New
  York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.
 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official
                       publication.
                                                                                                                                   INDEX NO. 161363/2017
 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198                                                                                                         RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

                                     SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
                                               NEW YORK COUNTY
           PRESENT:                HON. JAMES G. CL YNES                                                       PART                             22M
                                                                                                 Justice
           ---- ----- ---------- ------ --- --- ------ --- --- ------ --- ------------------------ -----X      INDEX l'iO.         161363/2017
            CHANDRADAI BISSESAR,
                                                                                                                                   05/02/2023,
                                                         Plaintiff,                                            MOTION DATE         06/05/2023

                                                     - V -
                                                                                                               MOTION SEQ. NO.       005 006

            TIME WARNER CABLE, DONOVAN E. CREARY, NARINE
            BISSESAR, STACY BISSESAR                                                                              DECISION+ ORDER ON
                                                                                                                        MOTION
                                                          Defendants.

           ---- ------- ----------------- --- ------ --- --- ----------------- ------------- --- -----X

           The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84,
           85, 86. 87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 93, 108,109,110, 111, 112, 113, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125
           were read on this motion to/for                                                                  JUDGMENT - SUMMARY

           The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 006) 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100,
           IOI, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 126, 127
           were read on this motion to/for                                                                  JUDGMENT - SUMMARY

                      Upon the foregoing documents and following oral argument, the motion by Defendants

          Narine Bissesar and Stacy Bissesar (Bissesar Defendants) for summary judgment on the issue of

           liability and dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint and all cross-claims and in the event a complete

          dismissal is not granted, dismissing Plaintiffs Verified Complaint against the Bissesar Defendants

           wherein the cross-claims of Time Warner Entertainment, L.P. and Donovan Creary are converted

           to a third-party action (Motion Sequence #5) and the motion by Plaintiff. Chandradai Bissesar, for

           summary judgment on the issue of liability against Defendants Time Warner Entertainment, Co.

           L.P., and Donovan E. Creary and striking Defendants Time Warner Entertainment, Co. L.P., and

           Donovan E. Creary's Second and Eighth Affirmative Defenses (Motion Sequence #6) are

           consolidated for decision and decided as follows:

                      Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a January 6, 20 I 7

           motor vehicle accident between a vehicle owned by Defendant Narine Bissesar and operated by

            161363/2017 BISSESAR, CIUNDRADAI vs. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT                                                         Page I of5
            Motion No. 005 006

[* 1]                                                                               1 of 5
        .-·r,"" ....... ~---'"'·   .----: ... -
                                                                                                                   INDEX NO. 161363/2017
  NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198                                                                                      RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

                     Defendant Stacy Bissesar within which Plaintiff was a passenger and a vehicle owned by

                     Defendant Time Warner Cable and operated by Defendant Creary.

                     Motion Sequence #5

                                   The Bissesar Defendants contend that Defendant Stacy Bissesar is not liable for the subject

                    accident or Plaintiffs injuries and that she is entitled to the protections of the emergency doctrine.

                     In support of their motion, the Bissesar Defendants rely on an uncertified police report, the

                    examination before trial (EBT) testimony of Plaintiff, Stacy Bissesar, and Defendant Creary, and

                    a Time Warner Cable Auto Incident Report.

                                   Plaintiff testified that she was a front seat passenger in a vehicle owned by her husband,

                    Defendant Narine Bissesar, and operated by her daughter Defendant Stacy Bissesar, traveling in

                    the left lane on Jamaica Avenue, going about 20-25 mph, wearing her seatbelt, she was looking

                    straight, did not see the Time Warner Cable (TWC) vehicle in front of her vehicle before the

                    accident, the TWC vehicle was in the right lane, her vehicle was moving at the time of impact,

                    when the TWC vehicle struck the right passenger side of her vehicle from the mirror to the

                    bumper.

                                   Defendant Stacy Bissesar testified that she was driving fully in the left lane going less than

                    25 mph, the TWC truck was in the right Jane, and he cut off in front of her trying to get into the

                    left lane, the side towards the front of the TWC vehicle was slightly in the left lane, her vehicle

                    was stopped at time of impact, the driver's back side of the TWC truck hit the front passenger's

                    side of her vehicle. Defendant Stacy Bissesar further testified that she saw the vehicle for the first

                    time when the accident occurred.

                                   Defendant Creary testified that he was working as a foreman for Spectrum/TWC, he made

                    a U-tum into the right lane, looked in his side view mirror, and changed lanes to go into the left

                    lane, going under 25 mph, did not see the other car that was involved in the collision, felt an impact

                    but no portion of his vehicle was in the right lane, his vehicle was straight in the left lane and he

                        161363/2017 BISSESAR, CHANDRADAI vs. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT                             Page 2 ors
                        Motion No. 005 006

[* 2]                                                                     2 of 5
                                                                                                 INDEX NO. 161363/2017
 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198                                                                     RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

          had fully completed his lane change before the accident happened. He further testified that after

          he felt the impact, he put his foot on the brake.

                  The TWC Accident Report by Defendant Creary states the following: "I was heading west

          on Jamaica Ave between 190th and 191 st Streets when I attempted to merge from the middle lane

          into the left lane when the truck I was driving was hit on the driver's side of the bumper."

                  Plaintiff has no opposition to the Bissesar Defendants' motion as it pertains to Defendant

          Time Warner Cable and Defendant Creary (Time Warner Defendants) being fully at fault for the

          collision. However, if the Bissesar Defendants' motion is denied, Plaintiff opposes their request

          to convert the claims into a third-party action. Plaintiff contends that this request has no basis in

          law, and the Bissesar Defendants provide no case law for this proposition. Plaintiff contends that

          as a passenger, Plaintiff may recover against either vehicle depending on fault that a jury may

          apportion. Therefore, in the event that the Time Warner Defendants are not found fully at fault,

          then, Plaintiff contends, the Bissesar Defendants should remain as defendants in this case and

          Plaintiff will be able to recover against either party, as per apportionment of fault by a jury, and

          joint and several liability rules.

                  The Time Warner Defendants oppose the Bissesar Defendants' motion contending that

          there are issues of fact and different versions of how the event occurred. The Time Warner

          Defendants refer to the police report, the EBT testimony of Plaintiff, Defendant Stacy Bissesar,

          and Defendant Creary, the TWC Auto Incident Report, and a photograph of the Bissesar vehicle.

                  A party moving for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to

          judgment as a matter of law, through admissible evidence eliminating all material issues of fact

          (CPLR 3212; Shaw v Looking Glass Assoc. LP, 8 AD3d 100, 102 [1st Dept 2004]). The party

          opposing the motion, on the other hand, must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form

          sufficient to require a trial of a material question of fact.

                  Here, the conflicting accounts of the accident set forth by the parties raise issues of fact

          sufficient to preclude summary judgment on the issue of liability in favor of the Bissesar

           161363/2017 BJSSESAR, CHANDRADAI \'S. TIME WARNER ENTERTAIN\1ENT                      Page 3 ors
           Motion No. 005 006

[* 3]                                                       3 of 5
                                                                                                 INDEX NO. 161363/2017
 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198                                                                     RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

           Defendants (Ramos v Rojas 37 A.D.3d 29 I, 292 [1st Dep 't 2007]). The Court has considered the

           Bissesar Defendants' remaining argwnents and finds them unavailing.

                   Motion Sequence #6

                   Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the Time Warner

           Defendants and striking their Second (culpable conduct) and Eighth Affirmative Defenses

           (Plaintiffs failure to use and wear a seatbelt) is granted in part.

                   Plaintiff relies on the EBT testimony of Plaintiff~ Defendant Stacy Bissesar, and Defendant

           Creary, the Time Warner Accident Report, and color photographs of the vehicles.

                   The Time Warner Defendants oppose Plaintiffs motion contending that questions of fact

          exist as to the cause of the subject accident.

                   The Bissesar Defendants support Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against the

          Time Warner Defendants contending that the evidence demonstrates that the vehicle operated by

           Defendant Creary and owned by Defendant Time Warner side swiped the vehicle operated by

           Defendant Stacy Bissesar at the time of the loss.

                   In reply, Plaintiff contends that the Time Warner Defendants feign an issue of fact, and

           that Defendant Creary·s testimony contradicts his statements in the Time Warner Accident Report.

                   Here, Plaintiff has established her lack of culpable conduct as an innocent passenger, which

          entitles her to summary judgment under CPLR 3212 (g) ( Oluwatayo v Dulinayan, 142 AD3d 113,

           120 [1st Dept 2016]). Plaintiff has also established, through her testimony, that she was wearing

           a seatbelt at the time of the accident.

                   However, Plaintiff has not established entitlement to summary judgment on liability

          against any Defendant because of the conflicting and unresolved facts concerning the accident and

           which vehicle was responsible for the accident (Id). Therefore, Plaintiffs motion is granted only

          to the extent that Plaintiff is an innocent passenger pursuant to CPLR 3212 (g) and the Time

            lf,1363/2017 BISSESAR, CIIANDRADAI vs. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINME~                      Page 4 of5
            Motion No. 005 006

[* 4]                                                      4 of 5
                                                                                                             INDEX NO. 161363/2017

 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198                                                                                RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

           Warner Defendants' Second (culpable conduct) and Eighth (Plaintiffs failure to use and wear a

           seatbelt) Affirmative Defenses are stricken.

                   Accordingly, it is

                   ORDERED that the motion by Defendants Narine Bissesar and Stacy Bissesar for

           summary judgment on the issue of liability (Motion Sequence #5) is DENIED; and it is further

                   ORDERED that the motion by Plaintiff for summary judgment on the issue of liability is                    \

           granted to the extent of finding no culpable conduct by Plaintiff on the issue of liability and

           dismissing Defendants Time Warner Entertainment, Co. L.P., and Donovan E. Creary's Second

           and Eighth Affirmative Defenses as against Plaintiff; and it is further

                   ORDERED that Defendants Time Warner Entertainment, Co. L.P., and Donovan E.

           Creary's Second and Eighth Affirmative Defenses are dismissed; and it is further

                   ORDERED that within 30 days of entry, Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Decision and

           Order upon Defendants with Notice of Entry.

                   This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.

                   4/19/2024
                     DATE                                                              JA.1\ttS' G: CL YNES, J.S.C.

                                      ~
            CHECK ONE:                    CASE DISPOSED                       NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

                                          GR.\'.\TED       □ 0E:\IED          GRA;-,;TED I'\ PART          □ OTHER
            APPLICATION:                  SETTLE ORDER                        SLB:'lllT ORDER

            CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:         INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASS!Gl'\        FIDL:CIARY APPOINTMENT       □ REFERENCE

            1613(,3/2017 BISSESAR, CHANDRADAI ,,s. TIME WAR:"iER ENTERTAIN:\IE!'ff                            Page 5 ofS
            Motion No. 00~ 006

[* 5]                                                          5 of 5