Court Opinion

ID: 4917453
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-22 00:11:49.734766+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:13:55.449579
License: Public Domain

Whitfield, C. J.
The appellants seek by bill in equity brought in the Circuit Court for Santa Eosa County to have a deed conveying 80 acres of land to the appellant Ona Prior reformed so as to cover 108 acres of land in accordance with an alleged parol agreement made before the execution of the deed of conveyance. The answer specifically denies the equities set up in the bill of complaint. Testimony was taken and a decree rendered for the defendants from which an appeal was taken by the complainants.
The execution of a deed conveying real estate is an act of importance that is presumed to have been done with deliberation and care; and where it is sought to have such a conveyance reformed so as to comply with a parol agreement alleged to have been made with reference to the conveyance before its execution, the proof of the parol agreement should at least be full, clear and convincing. Geter v. Simmons, 57 Fla. 423, 49 South. Rep. 131; Jacobs v. Parodi, 50 Fla. 541, 39 South Rep. 833; *512Knight & Co. v. Turner Cypress Co., 55 Fla. 690, 45 South. Rep. 1016.
In this case the testimony as to the alleged parol agreement that one hundred and eight acres of land would be conveyed when in fact the conveyance covered only eighty acres, is conflicting and is not so full, clear and convincing in favor of reformation as to warrant this court in holding that the chancellor erred in decreeing against reformation.
The decree is affirmed.
Shackleford and Cockrell, JJ., concur.
Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.