Court Opinion

ID: 9551632
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:56:33.218634+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:24:18.734779
License: Public Domain

SLOAN, J.,
dissenting.
The trial court was right. This case cannot be distinguished from the majority opinion in Jarvis et ux v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 1961, 227 Or 508, 363 P2d 740, or Blohm et al v. Glens Falls Ins. Co., 1962, 231 Or 410, 373 P2d 412, or Isenhart v. General Casualty Co., 1962, 233 Or 49, 377 P2d 26. It should be affirmed.