Court Opinion

ID: 1006963
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:18:48.396024+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:52.880583
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 01-7604

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

MICHAEL LORENZO MORRIS,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-94-46, CA-99-772-7)

Submitted:   March 14, 2002                 Decided:   March 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Michael Sacks, SACKS & SACKS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appel-
lant. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Michael Lorenzo Morris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.     Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Morris, Nos. CR-94-46; CA-99-

772-7 (W.D. Va. July 16, 2001).       We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                  2