Court Opinion

ID: 8625071
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-24 12:56:46.873208+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:55:37.069567
License: Public Domain

MEMORANDUM **
Raul Medina-Guillen appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence imposed for misdemeanor assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1).
*201Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Medina-Guillen’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.