Court Opinion

ID: 2903580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 20:30:37.940116+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:33.264627
License: Public Domain

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:  MANUEL AMAYA
(BANUELOS)
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
§
 
 § 

No. 08-09-00178-CR

Appeal from the

168th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#46092-168-3) 

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

	Pending before the Court is the State's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 
Appellant, Manuel Amaya (Banuelos) seeks to appeal the trial court's June 18, 2009 order
recommending to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that his application for an Article 11.07
writ of habeas corpus be denied.  Appellant is currently incarcerated for an aggravated assault
conviction for which he was sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment.  Although Appellant asserts it
was not filed as such, his application for writ of habeas corpus challenges his final felony
conviction, and is therefore subject to the procedures established by Article 11.07 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure.  See Solomon v. State, 39 S.W.3d 704, 706 (Tex.App.--Corpus
Christi 2001, no pet.).
	Article 11.07 establishes the procedures for a post-conviction application for writ of
habeas corpus in a non-capital felony case.  See Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon
Supp. 2008).  The only courts referred to in Article 11.07 are the convicting court and the Court
of Criminal Appeals.  In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001,
orig. proceeding).  The Article prescribes no role for the court of appeals.  See id.  This Court has
no jurisdiction over post conviction habeas corpus proceedings under Article 11.07.  See Ater v.
Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991)(orig. proceeding). 
Accordingly, we grant the State's motion and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
	Also pending before the Court, is Appellant's motion for supplementation of the record. 
As we have concluded we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal, Appellant's motion is denied.

August 12, 2009
						DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Rivera, J. (Not Participating)

(Do Not Publish)