Court Opinion

ID: 6073847
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-13 17:23:55.113952+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:52:59.080227
License: Public Domain

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated September 26, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish, as a matter of law, its entitlement to the return of its downpayment. Issues of fact exist, inter alia, as to whether the plaintiff was aware of and had assented to, the no-cancellation term (see, Williams v Dover Home Improvement, 276 AD2d 626; Gniewek v Consolidated Edison Co., 271 AD2d 643).
The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.