Court Opinion

ID: 9824446
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 10:46:07.184294+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:39:45.648190
License: Public Domain

KNOLL, Justice,
concurring.
| ¶While I agree with the majority’s holdings regarding the choice-of-pharmacy issue, mutual consent, and the imposition of penalties and attorney fees, I find its discussion and interpretation of La. R.S. 23:1203 and 23:1034.2 unnecessary. Rather I would review the penalties and attorney fees issue strictly from a La. R.S. 23:1142 context and find the record evidence reveals LUBA lacked an objective reason for failing to pay the statutorily mandated $750 owed per patient. For this reason, I respectfully concur.