Court Opinion

ID: 2864329
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-06 00:01:24.346553+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:08.594323
License: Public Domain

<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" link="#0000ff" vlink="#551a8b" alink="#ff0000" bgcolor="#c0c0c0">

<p><font size="+1"><strong><center>TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN</strong></font></center>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><hr align="center" width="26%">

<strong><center>NO. 03-0<a name="1">0</a>-00<a name="2">756</a>-CV</center>
</strong>

<p><hr align="center" width="26%">

<strong><center><a name="3">Edward C. Nix</a>, Appellant</center>
</strong>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><strong><center>v.</center>
</strong>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><strong><center><a name="4">The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania</a>, Appellee</center>
</strong>

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p><strong><hr size="3">

<center>FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF <a name="5">TRAVIS</a> COUNTY, <a name="6">261ST</a> JUDICIAL DISTRICT</center>
</strong>

<p><strong><center>NO. <a name="7">97-01105</a>, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON<a name="8"></a>, JUDGE PRESIDING </center>
</strong>

<p><strong><hr size="3">

</strong><strong>PER CURIAM</strong>

<p><strong>	</strong>Because appellant Edward C. Nix and appellee The Insurance Company of the
State of Pennsylvania have settled all matters in controversy, they filed an agreed motion to
dismiss this appeal.  Because they want the district court to enter an agreed judgment, we reverse
the judgment and remand the cause to the district court for entry of judgment consistent with the
parties' agreement.

<br wp="br1"><br wp="br2">
<p>Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

<p>Reversed and Remanded

<p>Filed:   February 28, 2001

<p>Do Not Publish
</body>
</html>