Court Opinion

ID: 6569252
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-20 19:22:33.006112+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:56:51.084265
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Whitford
delivered the opinion. of the court.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint. Upon the election of plaintiff in error not to plead over, the case was dismissed, and she brings it here for review.
The plaintiff claimed the right of homestead to certain property. Plaintiff in error brought this action against Felkey and the First National' Bank of Otis, to annul a trust deed executed by her, and a trustee’s deed, in virtue of her alleged claim of a homestead to the property involved. The complaint alleged that “a homestead entry was made of record on or about the 15th day of January, A. D. 1918, and was made in substantial compliance with the laws of the State of Colorado, and has ever since been and is now the homestead arid place of residence of Susie K. Crawford and L. L. Crawford, her husband.”
Section 5925, Compiled Laws, provides: “To entitle any person to the benefit of this act, he shall cause the word ‘homestead’ to be entered in the margin of his record title to the same, which marginal entry, shall be signed by the owner making such entry and attested by the clerk and recorder of the county in which the premises in question are situated, together with the date and time of day on which the said marginal entry is so made.”
The allegation of the complaint of a homestead entry was a mere conclusion of law. To entitle one to the benefit of a homestead, it must appear, by proper averments *446in the complaint, that he caused the word “homestead” to be entered in the margin of his or her record title, and that it was signed by the owner and attested by the clerk and recorder.
To acquire a homestead right, the statutory steps must be taken by the person seeking its protection.
The complaint was fatally defective as it did not show a compliance with the statute. Goodwin v. Colorado Mortgage Co., 110 U. S. 1, 3 Sup. Ct. 473, 28 L. Ed. 47.
The determination of this point makes it unnecessary to consider other points discussed by counsel.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Teller and Mr. Justice Denison concur.