Court Opinion

ID: 9941198
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 01:01:33.348697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:20.618669
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-60121        Document: 00517065614             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/15/2024

             United States Court of Appeals
                  for the Fifth Circuit
                                    ____________                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                       Fifth Circuit

                                      No. 23-60121                                   FILED
                                                                              February 15, 2024
                                    ____________
                                                                                Lyle W. Cayce
   Sumrall Capital, L.L.C.,                                                          Clerk

                                                                     Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                            versus

   Sanford Miller,

                                                                 Defendant—Appellant,

                                            versus

   U-Save Holdings, Incorporated; Trace Residential
   Properties, L.L.C.; Thomas P. McDonnell, III,

                                        Counter-Defendants—Appellees.
                     ______________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Mississippi
                              USDC No. 3:20-CV-784
                    ______________________________

   Before Smith, Graves, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *

         _____________________
         *
             This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-60121     Document: 00517065614          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/15/2024

                                   No. 23-60121

         This court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the
   record and the applicable law. Having done so, the judgment is
   AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons stated by the district court in its
   detailed and well-reasoned order.

                                        2