Court Opinion

ID: 6768574
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-21 00:40:33.913902+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:02:42.584239
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.