Court Opinion

ID: 2899498
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-09 00:07:52.397677+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:54:45.472313
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-08-0475-CR

                             IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                        PANEL D

                                   APRIL 14, 2009
                          ______________________________

                                  JOSEPH G. NUNEZ,

                                                                      Appellant

                                            V.

                                THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                      Appellees
                          ______________________________

            FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

              NO. 2007-415790; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING
                       _______________________________

                           ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                         _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

       Appellant Joseph G. Nunez appeals from his conviction for the offense of capital

murder. On March 6, 2009, the clerk’s record was filed. The reporter’s record was due on

March 5, 2009. On March 13, 2009, this Court notified the reporter by letter that the record

had not been filed and to advise the Court of the status of the record on or before March

23, 2009. On March 24, 2009, the reporter filed a motion for extension of time to file the
record, which was granted to April 6, 2009. On April 8, 2009, the reporter filed a second

extension motion requesting until June 8, 2009, to file the record.

       Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court

of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine:

              when the reporter’s record can reasonably be transcribed into
              written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay
              the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of
              depriving the appellant of their right to appeal.

       The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing, if any.       Additionally, the district court shall then file the

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this

court on or before May 14, 2009. Should further time be needed by the trial court to

perform these tasks, then same must be requested before May 14, 2009.

       It is so ordered.

                                                  Per Curiam

Do not publish.