Court Opinion

ID: 5842582
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 23:34:39.913642+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:43:49.206983
License: Public Domain

The motion court correctly determined that neither Real Property Law § 234 nor the plain terms of the lease provided for recovery of attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of an administrative application before the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (see e.g. Matter of Chessin v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 100 AD2d 297, 305-306 [1984]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.