Court Opinion

ID: 9393404
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-05-10 06:08:27.46167+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:53.158103
License: Public Domain

DENIED and Opinion Filed May 8, 2023

                                   S  In The
                            Court of Appeals
                     Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
                               No. 05-23-00393-CV

           IN RE LARRY M. WOLFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND
            DENISE L. WOLFORD, INDIVIDUALLY, Relators

           Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court
                            Dallas County, Texas
                     Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06038

                        MEMORANDUM OPINION
               Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia
                            Opinion by Justice Garcia
      Before the Court is relators’ April 28, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus

wherein relators challenge the trial court’s denial of relators’ rule 91a motion to

dismiss.

      Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
      Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

                                         /Dennise Garcia/
                                         DENNISE GARCIA
                                         JUSTICE

230393f.p05

                                      –2–