Court Opinion

ID: 4874526
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-08-26 03:05:08.969117+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:12:26.257883
License: Public Domain

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification

PER CURIAM.
Defendant files a motion for clarification and rehearing after this Court per curiam affirmed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
We grant his motion and withdraw the previous opinion. Upon reconsideration of the record, we find that Defendant’s August 23, 2010 motion for postconviction relief was untimely. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to this 2004 plea. See Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.