Court Opinion

ID: 662839
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 07:20:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:01:45.830120
License: Public Domain

16 F.3d 413NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Joseph L. LAFORNEY, Defendant Appellant.
No. 936932.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 1994.Decided Jan. 31, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.  W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
Joseph L. Laforney, appellant Pro Se.
Douglas McCullough, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Laforney, No. NCR-90-15-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 1993).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
AFFIRMED.