Court Opinion

ID: 676725
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 01:21:15+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:53.228528
License: Public Domain

33 F.3d 53
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Sharon Renee MABLE, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6647.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 1994.Decided August 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.  (CR-91-250-HM, CA-94-170-HM)
Sharon Renee Mable, appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Mable, Nos.  CR-91-250-HM;  CA-94-170-HM (D. Md. May 6, 1994).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED