Court Opinion

ID: 9950960
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-15 14:00:40.47103+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:35:39.749425
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 24-10322   Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 03/15/2024   Page: 1 of 2

                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                  In the
               United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                         ____________________

                               No. 24-10322
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                         ____________________

      THE STATE OF GEORGIA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
      versus
      BRIAN-SCOTT NETTLES,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                         ____________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Georgia
                   D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cv-00266-RWS
                         ____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-10322    Document: 7-1     Date Filed: 03/15/2024    Page: 2 of 2

      2                     Opinion of the Court                24-10322

      Before JILL PRYOR, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
      PER CURIAM:
              This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
      tion. Brian-Scott Nettles, proceeding pro se, appeals from the dis-
      trict court’s order remanding to state court a case in which he was
      charged with various state criminal offenses. We lack jurisdiction
      to review the remand order because it was based on the district
      court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
      § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96
      (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Hu-
      mana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
             No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
      with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
      other applicable rules.