Court Opinion

ID: 1004855
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:47:47.256853+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:15.756411
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 01-6597

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DWIGHT SPEARS, a/k/a Whitney,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-92-53)

Submitted:   July 12, 2001                 Decided:   July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Dwight Spears appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582.      We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Spears, No. CR-92-53 (W.D.N.C.

Dec. 18, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2