Court Opinion

ID: 5438138
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-08 17:57:32.479142+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:31:55.042226
License: Public Domain

By the Court:
It is clear that as against the McLaughlin mortgage Mrs. Hart had the right to insist that the outside lands included *640in that mortgage should he exhausted before resorting to the homestead tract. In this view these outside lands constituted, to the extent of their value, a security provided against the possible sacrifice of her homestead to pay McLaughlin’s debt. This security, for obvious reasons, could not be impaired to her injury without her consent. The debts are owing by her husband, and the liens of the junior mortgagees upon the outside lands were created by him alone and without her consent, and to hold that these latter mortgagees may, for their own benefit, compel a sale of the homestead to satisfy the McLaughlin mortgage, would be in .effect to create a lien in favor of the junior mortgagees upon the homestead of Mrs. Hart without her consent.
Decree affirmed; remittitur forthwith.