Court Opinion

ID: 4399863
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-05-23 15:44:18.519047+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:19.131819
License: Public Domain

05/23/2019
                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
                               AT KNOXVILLE
                                         May 9, 2019 Session

            STACY RENEE CARTER v. ANTONIO ELMORE CARTER

                       Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County
                         No. E-26064 Tammy M. Harrington, Judge

                                   No. E2019-00655-COA-R3-CV

This is an appeal from a final order in the parties’ divorce proceeding entered on April
18, 2017. The Notice of Appeal, filed with the Appellate Court Clerk on April 16, 2019,
was accompanied by a motion seeking leave to file it late, presumably pursuant to certain
provisions in Rule 4(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because the
Notice of Appeal was not timely filed, and because there is no authority in Rule 4(a) for a
waiver of the timely filing of a Notice of Appeal in a civil case, we do not have
jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

                   Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., AND JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J.

Antonio Elmore Carter, Knoxville, Tennessee, appellant, pro se.

Stacy Renee Carter, Maryville, Tennessee, appellee, pro se.

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION1

      Pursuant to the requirements of Rule 13(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate
Procedure, we reviewed the Notice of Appeal and accompanying documents submitted
       1
           Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:

                  This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case,
                  may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by
                  memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no
                  precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it
                  shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be
                  published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any
                  unrelated case.
by the appellant, Antonio Elmore Carter, at the outset of this proceeding to determine
whether the Court had jurisdiction to consider this appeal. The arguments presented by
the appellant in support of his motion seeking leave to file the Notice of Appeal late
appear to pertain more to the issues he anticipates raising on appeal, rather than to why
his Notice of Appeal was filed almost two years after entry of the judgment on appeal.

       In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must “be filed with the clerk of the
appellate court within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). “The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is
mandatory and jurisdictional in civil cases.” Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn.
2004). While Rule 4(a) contains language indicating that a notice of appeal “is not
jurisdictional” in a criminal case such that “the timely filing of such document may be
waived in the interest of justice,” Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a), these provisions have no
applicability in a civil appeal. If a notice of appeal is not filed in a civil case in a timely
fashion from the date of entry of the final judgment, we are not at liberty to waive the
procedural defect and must dismiss the appeal. See Arfken & Assocs., P.A. v. Simpson
Bridge Co., Inc., 85 S.W.3d 789, 791 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002); Am. Steinwinter Investor
Group v. Am. Steinwinter, Inc., 964 S.W.2d 569, 571 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997); Jefferson v.
Pneumo Services Corp., 699 S.W.2d 181, 184 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985).

      As such, the appellant’s motion seeking leave to file his Notice of Appeal late is
denied and this appeal is dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Antonio
Elmore Carter, for which execution may issue if necessary.2

                                                                                  PER CURIAM

        2
         We note that the appellant failed to pay any of the court costs associated with this appeal at the
time he filed the Notice of Appeal, and that an order was entered on May 8, 2019, directing him to pay
these costs or face dismissal of the appeal based upon his non-payment. The dismissal of this appeal for
the reasons articulated in this opinion does not relieve the appellant from his obligation to pay all court
costs associated with this proceeding.
                                                     2