Court Opinion

ID: 995728
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:41:20.663781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:30.933441
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-6661

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

BRYANT LAMAR ALEXANDER,

                                            Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief
District Judge. (CR-95-178-V, CA-98-42-V-3)

Submitted:   July 2, 1998                  Decided:   July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Lamar Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Alexander, Nos. CR-95-178-V; CA-98-42-V-3

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                2