Court Opinion

ID: 7931680
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-08 23:05:06.581731+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:33:22.381376
License: Public Domain

Per curiam.
Bill for divorce. The defendant interposed a plea that he was never married to the complainant. The court, on hearing upon this plea, overruled it, and gave defendant leave to answer within twenty days. Without waiting for the expiration of the twenty days defendant appealed, and complainant moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order overruling the p^lea was not a final order.
The defendant undoubtedly had a right, within twenty days, to elect to abide by his plea, or to answer, under the permission given him. Had he waited till the expiration of the twenty days without answering, and then appealed, we should have had no doubt of his right to take that course. And we are inclined to hold that when he appeals within the twenty days, he thereby elects 'to stand by his plea, and not to accept the permission given him to answer; and in this view the appeal may be saved.
Motion denied, without costs.