Court Opinion

ID: 5650975
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 23:00:34.85087+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:38:34.937053
License: Public Domain

CRAIG, J.
This action having been decided in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles, an appeal was taken to the superior court, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs thereafter appealed to this court from said judgments.  The respondents moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that under the provisions of section 4b, article VI, of the Constitution, effective August 14, 1929, the superior court became the tribunal’ of final jurisdiction in such cases. However the appeal last mentioned was perfected prior to said date, hence the motion is without foundation. (Harris v. Moore, 102 Cal. App. 413 [283 Pac. 76]; Jones v. Summers, 105 Cal. App. 51 [286 Pac. 1093]; Berg v. Traeger, *740210 Cal. 323 [292 Pac. 495]; D. Q. Service Corp. v. Securities Loan & D. Co., 210 Cal. 327 [292 Pac. 497].)
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Works, P. J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.