Court Opinion

ID: 8268577
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-16 19:17:09.769888+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:26.879626
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.
In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents.
The decree should be affirmed.
*404For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.
For reversal — None.