Court Opinion

ID: 4585852
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2020-11-12 21:06:20.086971+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:47:52.275043
License: Public Domain

People v Suazo (2020 NY Slip Op 06460)

People v Suazo

2020 NY Slip Op 06460

Decided on November 12, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: November 12, 2020

Before: Gische, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Kennedy, JJ. 

Ind No. 550/17, 1273/15, 1974/16 Appeal No. 12344 Case No. 2018-04358 

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 
vBladimir Suazo, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert Myers of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (April A. Newbauer, J.), rendered December 19, 2017,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: November 12, 2020
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.