Court Opinion

ID: 5259452
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 18:38:18.359114+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:03.471523
License: Public Domain

Pee Ctjeiam :
So much of this order as granted to the defendant the right to a bill of particulars from the plaintiffs of the consideration of the instrument sued upon must be reversed for the reason that the consideration of the instrument is not made an issue by the pleadings. Where the action is upon a negotiable instrument, in order to raise the issue of want of consideration the defendant must allege affirmatively that the instrument was without consideration. (See Abrahamson v. Steele, 176 App. Div. 865.) Not being able to question the consideration the defendant is not entitled to a bill of particulars in respect thereof.
The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — Claeke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Geeenbaum, JJ.
Order, so far as appealed from, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for bill of particulars of consideration denied.