Court Opinion

ID: 1012159
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:40:14.946551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:02.386204
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 03-7627

PETE SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad,

                                             Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-709-5-BO)

Submitted:   December 11, 2003           Decided:   December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Pete Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000).   We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Smith v. Dewalt, No. CA-03-709-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2003).   We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2