Court Opinion

ID: 2803455
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-26 20:15:23.207189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:50:24.824837
License: Public Domain

ORDER
  

  PER CURIAM.
 

  AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:
 

  Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial judge’s decision precluding the Commonwealth from referencing [Respondent’s] pre-arrest failure to inquire as to the welfare of the victims, specifically the [Respondent’s] spontaneous, self-initiated contact with police, that was not in response to any police questioning, after he arrived at the arson scene of his own volition?