Court Opinion

ID: 8145606
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:22:43.878181+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:34.148064
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the *585act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat: 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 150 U. S. 85, 88; Erie R. R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46, 51.
Mr. William Grant, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. A. P. Cutten and Mr. Carl I. Wheat, with whom Mr. Hugh Gordon and Mr. Wm. B. Bosley were on the brief, for defendants in error.