Court Opinion

ID: 6340940
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-16 07:19:25.735919+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:49:15.906291
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                          OF TEXAS
                                       NO. WR-93,001-02

               EX PARTE JEFFREY DWAYNE BLANKENSHIP, Applicant

                 ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                  CAUSE NO. 4839-C IN THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM JACK COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                            ORDER

        Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 55 years’ imprisonment.

Applicant was then offered a new plea deal, the judgment was set aside, and he pled guilty to robbery

and was sentenced to 55 years’ imprisonment. Applicant’s appeal to the Second Court of Appeals

was dismissed. Blankenship v. State, No. 02-19-00069-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 5, 2020)

(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.

art. 11.07.

        Applicant contends, among other things, that appellate counsel was ineffective because

appellate counsel did not inform him that by accepting the plea bargain his appeal would be
                                                                                                       2

dismissed. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Smith v. Robbins, 528

U.S. 259 (2000); Ex parte Miller, 330 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s

claim. Appellate counsel’s response should include what he told Applicant regarding his appeal, and

the benefit of the new plea deal. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate

counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make

specific findings as to whether appellate counsel told Applicant his appeal would be dismissed if he

accepted the plea bargain. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
                      3

Filed: MAY 11, 2022
Do not publish