Court Opinion

ID: 1008635
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:43:21.901789+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:47.052799
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Luther C. Edmonds appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to
   
   *713
   
  reconsider prior orders dismissing his civil action and imposing sanctions against him. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Edmonds v. Grissom,
  
  No. CA-98-488 (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.