Court Opinion

ID: 1008107
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:35:32.117739+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:26.083725
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 02-6858

MOSES TONKLLIE TOLBERT,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

                                              Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
02-36-JFM)

Submitted:   July 18, 2002                 Decided:    July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Moses Tonkllie Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio,
United States Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Moses Tonkllie Tolbert appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition.    We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.   See Tolbert v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-36-JFM (D. Md.

Apr. 16, 2002).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2