Court Opinion

ID: 72166
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 07:27:40+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:29.441058
License: Public Domain

Case: 09-10570        Document: 00511068355              Page: 1       Date Filed: 04/01/2010

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                                        April 1, 2010

                                             No. 09-10570                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                           Clerk

BOBBY DON COOK,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellant
v.

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; TOM WILDER, District Clerk of Tarrant
County, Texas

                                                          Defendants-Appellees

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  Consolidated w/No. 09-10571

PETER HINOJOSA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellant
v.

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; TOM WILDER, District Clerk of Tarrant
County, Texas

                                                          Defendants-Appellees

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas-Fort Worth Division
                                No. 4:08-CV-00316-A

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BENAVIDES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   Case: 09-10570       Document: 00511068355          Page: 2    Date Filed: 04/01/2010

                         No. 09-10570, cons. w/No. 09-10571

PER CURIAM:*
       The court has carefully considered these consolidated cases in light of the
briefs, oral argument and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we
find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm essentially for the reasons
stated by the district court.
                                                                              AFFIRMED.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

                                              2