Court Opinion

ID: 5130965
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-02 17:02:34.203626+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:53.264971
License: Public Domain

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
  UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
                  AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

                                     IN THE
              ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
                                 DIVISION ONE

                      STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

                                         v.

                          JOSE TERRAZAS, Petitioner.

                          No. 1 CA-CR 21-0350 PRPC
                               FILED 12-2-2021

     Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
                         Nos. CR2005-034221-001
                               CR2006-127957-001
                               CR2007-171066-001
                   The Honorable Timothy J. Ryan, Judge

                   REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

                                    COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
By Amanda M. Parker
Counsel for Respondent

Jose Terrazas, Florence
Petitioner
                            STATE v. TERRAZAS
                            Decision of the Court

                       MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins and Judge
Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1             Petitioner Jose Luis Terrazas seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is
petitioner’s second successive petition.

¶2             Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is
petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by
denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz.
537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of
establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3            We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.

¶4            We grant review and deny relief.

                           AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
                           FILED: AA

                                         2