Court Opinion

ID: 9881812
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-04 00:00:33.083307+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:25:16.203482
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10191         Document: 00516918110             Page: 1      Date Filed: 10/03/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10191
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                October 3, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Randy Steven Hanes,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:19-CR-206-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Willett, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Randy Steven Hanes has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Hanes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
   and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10191    Document: 00516918110         Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/03/2023

                                 No. 23-10191

   counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                      2