Court Opinion

ID: 9386789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-13 17:01:04.634815+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:08.539350
License: Public Domain

U NITED S TATES A IR F ORCE
              C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES                               )       No. ACM 40291
          Appellee                          )
                                            )
                 v.                         )
                                            )       ORDER
Triston D. JOHNSON                          )
Airman First Class (E-3)                    )
U.S. Air Force                              )
             Appellant                      )       Panel 2

   On 10 March 2022, Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial at
Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, of one specification of possessing child
pornography in violation on Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice
(UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934.1 The military judge sentenced Appellant to a dishon-
orable discharge, confinement for 14 months, forfeiture of all pay and allow-
ances, and reduction to the grade of E-1.
    On 4 April 2023, Appellant’s counsel submitted a Consent Motion to Exam-
ine Sealed Materials, requesting permission for appellate counsel for the Ap-
pellant and the Government to examine Prosecution Exhibits 11–13, 18–19, 21
and 23.
   Upon this court’s review of the record, we discovered Prosecution Exhibits
11–23 missing.2 Consequently, the record of trial in Appellant’s case is to be
returned to the Chief Trial Judge, Air Force Trial Judiciary, for correction un-
der Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1112(d). As the record is being returned,
we find Appellant’s motion to examine sealed material to be moot. However,
Appellant may again file a motion to view sealed materials after the case has
been redocketed with this court.
    Accordingly, it is by the court on this 11th day of April, 2023,
ORDERED:
    The record of trial in Appellant’s case is returned to the Chief Trial Judge,
Air Force Trial Judiciary, for correction under R.C.M. 1112(d) to account for
Prosecution Exhibits 11–23, and any other portion of the record that is

1 All references in this order to the UCMJ and Rules for Courts-Martial are to the
Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.).
2 The court notes that Preliminary Hearing Officer (PHO) Exhibit 13 is also absent

from the record of trial.
                  United States v. Johnson, No. ACM 40291

determined to be missing or defective hereafter, after consultation with the
parties. See Article 66(g), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(g); R.C.M. 1112(d)(2)–(3).
Thereafter, the record of trial will be returned to this court for completion of
its appellate review under Article 66(d), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(d).
    The record of trial will be returned to the court not later than 9 May 2023.
If the record cannot be returned to the court by that date, the Government will
inform the court in writing not later than 2 May 2023 of the status of the
Government’s compliance with this order.
It is further ordered:
   Appellant’s Consent Motion to Examine Sealed Material is MOOT.

                    FOR THE COURT

                    CAROL K. JOYCE
                    Clerk of the Court

                                       2