Court Opinion

ID: 9829900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 19:42:52.736813+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:08.568363
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellants, by an able motion for rehearing, claim that we erred in our original disposition of this case. We have again considered all of the assignments of error of appellants and believe they are all without merit.
By argument, appellants complain that Mrs. Johnson, the mother of the child, was not allowed, by the trial court, to visit the child. The only question before the trial court and this court was the permanent custody of the child, and our affirmance of the decree of the trial court is, of course, without prejudice to appellants’ right to apply to the trial court, or any other district court having jurisdiction, asking for the right to visit the child at such reasonable times as the trial court may determine.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.