Court Opinion

ID: 9578087
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:41:22.810515+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:22:36.491497
License: Public Domain

Carr, J.
(dissenting). I am not in accord with the proposed holding that plaintiffs’ appeal should be dismissed summarily for failure to properly comply with provisions of present Court Rules relating to the contents of briefs and appendices. On behalf of appellants, counsel have filed 3 separate briefs, each with an appendix. Apparently an attempt has been made in good faith to comply with the requirements specified in Rules No 67 and 68.
If a majority of the members of this Court consider that the briefs and appendices filed on behalf •of appellant are not satisfactory, opportunity should *655be afforded counsel to file a brief and appendix that will remedy present deficiencies. To that end the-case should be continued to the June term for decision, and counsel allowed such reasonable time as the-Court may by order prescribe for filing of the required brief and appendix. The action was one to-recover damages for personal injuries, and plaintiffs should not be deprived of the right of appeal to this Court.
Kelly, J., concurred with Carr, J.