Court Opinion

ID: 9830447
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 20:13:20.234986+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:43:22.701176
License: Public Domain

On Rehearing.
The motions of appellant and appellee for rehearing are overruled.
 We are asked to affirm the judgment as to.those parties who did not join in the appeal. W. H. Ketehum was the appellant from a judgment in favor of appellee, Boggs, and the reversal only affects those two and those parties to the suit who were interested in the issues in litigation between them.
Defendant Peck filed a cross-bill and made others parties to the action and raised different issues from those between Ketehum and Boggs, upon which judgment was rendered, and which are separate and distinct and in no way dependent one upon the other. So this court was not called upon to act on that part of the judgment relating to Peck and those whom he made parties, as there was no appeal from that part of the judgment. We have no jurisdiction of the matter to dispose of the others, but left it to stand as rendered.