Court Opinion

ID: 1004751
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:45:54.443329+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:08:14.787988
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-6142

JERRY D. DWIGGINS,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

WILLIAM D. ANDERSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH
CAROLINA,

                                          Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-243-1)

Submitted:   June 5, 2001                  Decided:   June 28, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry D. Dwiggins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Jerry D. Dwiggins seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Dwiggins v. Anderson, No. CA-00-243-1 (M.D.N.C.

Dec. 19 & 27, 2000).    We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2