Court Opinion

ID: 9462814
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-04 22:51:12.188777+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:37:48.290072
License: Public Domain

*237CLARK, Circuit Judge:
I concur in the result reached in Part I of Judge Ainsworth’s dissent. In my view, the attachment of the electronic signal device to this vehicle was not a search. The capture of its signal was not an unreasonable seizure proscribed by the Fourth Amendment. I would reverse without reaching any issue of standing to challenge this procedure- — Parts II and IV. I concur without reservation in the remainder of the dissent. See United States v. Frazier, 8 Cir., 1976, 538 F.2d 1322, decided July 16, 1976, concurring opinion of Ross, J., at 1325.