Court Opinion

ID: 9559749
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:35:03.53164+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:37.634616
License: Public Domain

KEETON, Justice
(dissenting).
The question for determination in this matter is not the negligence of the respondent company, but whether or not the deceased Mrs. Stowers was guilty of contributory negligence.
According to the undisputed facts, she was asked by the driver of the car whether there was a train approaching, and after looking advised that the way was clear. The driver of the car then drove ahead and ran into a passing train that could have been only a short distance away when Mrs. Stowers looked up and down the track.
By her actions she not only placed herself in danger, but the other occupants of the car as well. Her contributory negligence caused her death.
If she looked and did not see she should not have advised the driver that all was clear and, in effect, directed the car to proceed.
A railroad track is in itself a sign of danger, and those entering upon a track where a train is likely to be must look and listen, and stop if necessary, for their own protection. A violation of this duty is negligence.
Hence I do not concur in the majority opinion, and am of the opinion that the judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be affirmed.