Court Opinion

ID: 8529156
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-23 10:59:24.01616+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:51:43.354441
License: Public Domain

Mr. Justice Wole
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a case where the appellee began a summary proceeding on August 9, 1921, to recover a mortgage debt. The auction sale took place and the debtor seeks to annul the proceedings. The mortgage, it was maintained, matured by reason of the non-payment of interest, but the debtor insisted that he did not owe any interest. The court decided against him.
The public auction of the mortgaged premises took place on November 3, 1921. In May of that year the creditor had presented to the debtor a current account for a much greater amount than the interest, but the instalments of interest were included in the current account. A suit for this amount was begun, but was suspended-by a bankruptcy adjudication and order.
On July 27, 1921, the appellant filed in the District Court of the United States a petition in bankruptcy. .Scheduled in the debts filed by the bankrupt was the account presented by the creditor in May and which included the interest due. Subsequently there was a- composition accepted *39by the creditors of the bankrupt, but in the composition proceedings the appellee did not intervene.
The composition settlement was for 15 per cent of the debts and it is a fact that the mortgage creditor ultimately accepted 15 per cent of the whole submitted May account. The complainant maintains that this payment and acceptance discharged the whole debt due. The composition offer was confirmed however on December 3, 1921. At that time the auction sale was a completely consummated transaction, having taken place on November 3, 1921. The schedules in the bankruptcy case, being a voluntary one, were prepared by the bankrupt and the record makes it highly probable that when creditor Centeno accepted the check in the composition he did not realize that it was for the whole claim presented in May, including the interest on the mortgage. It was conceded at the hearing that the payment- in composition to Centeno was made after the mortgage sale was consummated.
In any event, at no time until the conclusion of the mortgage proceeding had the creditor taken any step to accept payment and none had actually been made. So that the District Court’of Humacao had complete jurisdiction and authority to proceed to auction and sell the mortgaged property. The fact that the creditor in the bankruptcy proceeding actually received 15 per cent of the interest due on the mortgage would entitle the appellant to recover the same in a suit for that which was not due (lo indebido), but nothing done after the sale could have a retroactive effect.
Moreover, the mortgage contract provided that the whole mortgage should mature if the debtor failed to pay three months’ interest. Such a default was made and the mortgage became due. We might’ question, without deciding, whether the payment of the interest subsequently could annul the whole mortgage proceeding.
The judgment appealed from must be affirmed.-