Court Opinion

ID: 3661945
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:13:12.150198+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:17.035438
License: Public Domain

In the judgment of Stacy, J. August Term, 1917, Duplin Superior Court, it was adjudged that "the defendant, J. H. Graves, who now unlawfully and wrongfully obstructs said alley-way, proceed and he is hereby commanded and directed to remove said building from said alley-way, and he is hereby given until 1 May, 1918, to remove the same, and open said alley-way, and this cause is retained for further orders, and the assessment of the plaintiff's damages incurred to be inquired of by a jury."
In response to a rule to show cause why he should not be attached for failing to obey said order, the defendant says that he has cut an opening in his building 12 feet wide and 12 feet high, and avers that this is a full compliance with the order of the court.
We do not think that what the plaintiff has done is in any sense a compliance with the judgment. He has merely opened a pathway through the first story of the building and left the second story intact, extending across the alley-way. It is manifest that this is not a compliance with the judgment of the court.
Affirmed. *Page 135