Court Opinion

ID: 3122223
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 14:20:51.722782+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:17:14.076971
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00344-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
 
IN RE: ROLANDO CASTRO
____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

	On June 29, 2010, relator, Rolando Castro, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. 
On July 7, 2010, the Court requested that the real party in interest, Transmontaigne, Inc.,
file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus.  Relator has now filed a motion to
dismiss this original proceeding.  According to the motion to dismiss, the parties have
compromised and settled their differences.  
	The Court, having considered the documents on file and relator's motion to dismiss
this original proceeding, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Accordingly,
this original proceeding is DISMISSED without reference to the merits thereof.  Pending
motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.
	IT IS SO ORDERED.		
								PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 
7th day of September, 2010.  

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is
not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).