Court Opinion

ID: 155393
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-08-14 04:15:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:27.508833
License: Public Domain

F I L E D
                                                                   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                           Tenth Circuit
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                           OCT 9 1997
                             FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                      PATRICK FISHER
                                                                               Clerk

    JOHN MORGAN,

                Petitioner-Appellant,

    v.                                                    No. 96-5243
                                                   (D.C. No. 96-CV-748-BU)
    TULSA COUNTY, Oklahoma,                               (N.D. Okla.)

                Respondent-Appellee.

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY, McKAY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

         After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

*
      This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
      Petitioner filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking habeas corpus

relief. Petitioner was convicted in Oklahoma state court after a retrial; another

trial on separate charges was scheduled for January, 1997. The district court

dismissed the habeas action, without prejudice, because petitioner had not

exhausted his available state remedies by presenting his claims to the Oklahoma

Court of Criminal Appeals. We AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal without

prejudice. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 731 (1991). The application

for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the portion of the district court’s

order of September 5, 1996, ordering partial payment of fees is VACATED. 1

                                                     Entered for the Court

                                                     Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
                                                     Circuit Judge

1
      This court held in United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737, 743 (10th Cir.
1997), that the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915,
does not apply to habeas actions. We, therefore, vacate that portion of the district
court’s order that ordered partial fee payment in accordance with the amended
§ 1915.

                                         -2-