Court Opinion

ID: 1001953
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:03:15.242974+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:17:43.116051
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                             No. 00-6618

THURMAN ODELL BLANKS,

                                           Petitioner - Appellant,

          versus

MICHAEL T. W. BELL,

                                            Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-545-5-BO)

Submitted:   June 15, 2000                 Decided:   June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Odell Blanks, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Thurman Odell Blanks seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).    We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.   According-

ly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

substantially on the reasoning of the district court.    See Blanks

v. Bell, No. CA-99-545-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2000); see also

Williams v. Taylor, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 1519 (2000).   We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                  2