Court Opinion

ID: 3008943
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-09 00:00:47.631603+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:28.233004
License: Public Domain

Case: 14-50679      Document: 00513225291         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/08/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                    No. 14-50679
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                          October 8, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FIDEL MAR REBOLLAR-GOMEZ, also known as Fidel Gomez Rebollar, also
known as Juan Manuel Lopez, also known as Fidel Gomez, also known as
Jose Ramirez Delgado, also known as Jose Rebollar-Mondragon, also known
as Fidelmar Rebollar-Gomez,
                                        Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:12-CR-198-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Fidel Mar Rebollar-Gomez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011).    Rebollar-Gomez has not filed a response.              We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-50679    Document: 00513225291    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/08/2015

                                No. 14-50679

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2