Court Opinion

ID: 997479
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 16:57:23.39191+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:35.044836
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 98-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

SAMUEL AUGUSTUS STEWART,

                                             Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-95-63, CA-97-749-R)

Submitted:   December 17, 1998            Decided:   January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Augustus Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Samuel Augustus Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998).    We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court.   See United States v. Stewart, No.

CR-95-63; CA-97-749-R (W.D. Va. May 5, 1998).    We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

                                                        DISMISSED

                                2