Court Opinion

ID: 996018
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:45:24.728845+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:43.616565
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 97-7451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DAVID ANTIONNE SMITH,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-91-443, CA-97-840-AM)

Submitted:   August 11, 1998                 Decided:   August 27, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Antionne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reinke, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-91-7451; CA-97-840-AM (E.D.

Va. Sept. 17, 1997). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           DISMISSED

                                2