Court Opinion

ID: 9584377
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 22:47:28.750297+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:07:40.194779
License: Public Domain

Petition for Rehearing
Before Lusk, Chief Justice, and Brand, Belt*, Rossman and Hay, Justices.
Petition denied.
BRAND, J.
The appellant seeks a rehearing and in support thereof says:
“Appellant respectfully contends that error was made in the following language (Opinion p. 11) ‘ The defendant is entitled to have the decree of the eir*616cuit court enforced forthwith, and in full,’ - - - and - ' - - ‘ The circuit court retains jurisdiction to. act if, after enforcement of the. decree there should be a material change of conditions to the detriment of the child’.”
Our intention was to make it clear that the decree of the circuit court was to be carried out forthwith and without any intervening litigation. The decree which we affirmed speaks as of its date, and determines the right of custody as of that date. The circuit court retains jurisdiction as in other cases, to consider applications based on alleged change of conditions material to the welfare of the child and subsequent to the decree. It was not the intention of this court to impose any different or unusual limitation upon that jurisdiction. The other assignments of error have been considered and are without merit. The petition is denied.