Court Opinion

ID: 8076882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 12:42:40.350337+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:16.510505
License: Public Domain

DOWLING, J.
Plaintiff contracted with defendant to supply and put in place the glass for certain showcases which defendant was installing under a contract with the city of New York The work has been completed, and all of the contract price paid, except the amount sued for. Defendant asserts a counterclaim in such amount for damages done to the woodwork of the cases by plaintiff's employés while putting in the glass.
*13It is established that all the woodwork had been installed, painted, and finished when the glass was put in; that- in putting in the glass plaintiff’s employes chipped the mahogany woodwork of the sides of the cases, chipped the glass, and ground the fragments^ of it into the painted bottoms of the cases by walking over it, refusing to use the paper furnished by defendant to protect the cases. The plaintiff was notified of the damage done, but refused to repair the same, and the work was done at a cost of $123.95. Upon these facts defendant was entitled to recover the amount of his counterclaim. It is no sufficient answer to say that the amount of damage done was slight in comparison with the total amount of work performed.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.