Court Opinion

ID: 3101035
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:08:32.99891+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:18:28.027361
License: Public Domain

.

                                       IN THE
                               TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                        No. 10-10-00035-CR

                       IN RE LORENZA LEON BLAYLOCK, JR.

                                       Original Proceeding

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

        Lorenza Leon Blaylock, Jr. a Texas inmate, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling

the judge1 of the 87th District Court of Freestone County, to vacate his judgment of

conviction on grounds that the District Attorney had neither taken nor filed his oaths of

office; thus, Blaylock maintains that the judgment is void. See TEX. CONST. ART. V, § 21;

see also TEX. CONST. ART. XVI, § 1. We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.2

1        Blaylock names the Honorable Horace Dickson Black, Jr. as judge of the 87th Judicial District
Court of Freestone County. Judge Black presided over Blaylock’s trial, but retired from the 77th Judicial
District Court of Freestone and Limestone Counties. The Honorable Deborah Oakes Evans is the current
elected judge of the 87th Judicial District Court.

2       Blaylock’s appendix does not comply with Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.3 and 52.7. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7. Nevertheless, we will apply Rule of Appellate Procedure
2 and disregard this deficiency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
        A writ of habeas corpus is the “exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony

convictions.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte

Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, orig. proceeding); TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Appellate courts lack jurisdiction over

such writs. See Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at 261; see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.

11.07(3)(a), (b); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (Vernon 2005). Although such an

application must be filed with the trial court, the writ, which issues by operation of law,

“must be made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals.” Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at

261 (quoting TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07(3)).

        Blaylock’s petition for writ of mandamus essentially seeks habeas corpus relief.

See Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at 261; see also In re Bruno, No. 10-07-00397-CR, 2008 Tex.

App. LEXIS 506, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Waco Jan. 23, 2008, orig. proceeding) (not

designated for publication).    Because we lack jurisdiction to grant such relief, we

dismiss Blaylock’s petition for writ of mandamus and all pending motions in this

proceeding for want of jurisdiction. See Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at 261; see also Bruno,

2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 506, at *1-2.

                                                        FELIPE REYNA
                                                        Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray
       Justice Reyna, and
       Justice Davis
Writ dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed March 3, 2010
[OT06]

In re Blaylock                                                                       Page 2