Court Opinion

ID: 3801750
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 07:43:58.20244+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:22:31.999376
License: Public Domain

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Texas county of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 90 days. *Page 329 
Defendant complains that the court erred in giving the following instruction:
"You are further instructed that the court has permitted certain testimony to go before you introduced by the state for the purpose of impeaching the evidence of the defendant, and in this connection you are instructed that such evidence may be considered by you for the purpose of determining the credibility of the defendant as a witness, but such testimony is no evidence whatever of the defendant's guilt."
This court has uniformly held that it is reversible error for the trial court to single out the accused and instruct upon the credibility of his evidence. Mitchell v. State,2 Okla. Crim. 442, 101 P. 1100; Clark v. State, 4 Okla. Crim. 368,111 P. 659; Heacock v. State, 4 Okla. Crim. 606, 112 P. 949; Peck v. State, 5 Okla. Crim. 104, 113 P. 200; Smith v. State,5 Okla. Crim. 67, 113 P. 204; Williams v. State, 53 Okla. Crim. 285,10 P.2d 731.
Because of the error of the court in giving the instruction complained of, the cause is reversed and remanded.
EDWARDS, J., concurs. DAVENPORT, P. J., absent, not participating.