Court Opinion

ID: 5128894
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-11-23 20:00:24.899654+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:09.821626
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                      No. 21-7158

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA,

                    Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1)

Submitted: October 28, 2021                                 Decided: November 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 12

motions in his ongoing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,

545-46 (1949). The order Nabaya seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Nabaya’s motions to correct his

sentence and for immediate release, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

also deny Nabaya’s motion and supplemental motion to amend his certificate of interested

persons. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

                                                                               DISMISSED

                                             2