Court Opinion

ID: 575789
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:15:21+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:23.702116
License: Public Domain

953 F.2d 687
293 U.S.App.D.C. 291
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Michael E. DUVALL, Appellant,v.Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, et al.
No. 91-5102.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 30, 1992.Rehearing Denied March 6, 1992.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER
PER CURIAM

1
Upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel, the motion for summary affirmance and the response to the court's July 15, 1991 order to show cause, it is

2
ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged.   It is

3
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied.   Appointment of counsel in a civil action is exceptional and is wholly unwarranted when appellant has not demonstrated any likelihood of success on the merits.   See D.C.Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 39 (1987).   It is

4
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum filed January 14, 1991.   The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action.   See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.19887) (per curiam);   Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.)  (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

5
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.   See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.