Court Opinion

ID: 3063588
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-14 21:15:41.942296+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:32.792656
License: Public Domain

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              APR 10, 2009
                               No. 08-16297                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 02-00122-CR-T-24-EAJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

RONALD RAY LANGDON,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                               (April 10, 2009)

Before BIRCH, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Ray Langdon, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

district court’s order denying Langdon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

                                          2