Court Opinion

ID: 3562870
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:13:01.394689+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:01.955785
License: Public Domain

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry. We have considered the allowance of counsel fee made by the vice-chancellor, and find nothing in the record to indicate that it was excessive. We therefore conclude it should not be disturbed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 292