Court Opinion

ID: 9955315
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-28 09:15:42.703834+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:15:29.972316
License: Public Domain

In The
                              Court of Appeals
                     Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

                                   No. 07-23-00222-CR

                       CHRISTIAN ANGEL ZUBIA, APPELLANT

                                            V.

                          THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

                          On Appeal from the 222nd District Court
                                 Deaf Smith County, Texas
             Trial Court No. CR-2022I-141, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding

                                    March 27, 2024
                   ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
                Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

      Christian Angel Zubia appealed his conviction for murder and sentence. His brief

was originally due January 17, 2024, but we granted his retained counsel, Charles

Blevins, an extension to February 16, 2024. Counsel filed no brief on behalf of appellant.

By letter dated February 26, 2024, we admonished Blevins that the failure to file a brief

by March 7 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial

court for further proceedings. In response, counsel filed a “Letter of Intent to Dismiss

Appeal” on March 7, 2024 and represented therein that appellant intended to file a motion
to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. To date, however, we have received neither a motion

to dismiss nor an appellant’s brief.

       Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

determine the following:

       (1)    whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

       (2)    whether appellant is indigent;

       (3)    why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on appellant’s behalf;

       (4)    whether appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

       (5)    whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
              counsel;

       (6)    whether new counsel should be appointed; and

       (7)    if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date on which the
              appellant’s brief will be filed.

       The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 26, 2024.

If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new

counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of

any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

                                               2
       Should appellant’s counsel file either a brief or a motion to voluntarily dismiss the

appeal before April 12, 2024, he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the

filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

       It is so ordered.

                                                          Per Curiam

Do not publish.

                                              3