Court Opinion

ID: 1003972
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:34:19.190367+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:29.625752
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7497

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

DANIEL RAYMOND LUTZ,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting
by designation. (CR-95-293, CA-99-3663-HNM)

Submitted:   March 22, 2001                 Decided:   March 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Lutz, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Andrew Clayton
White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Daniel Lutz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).    We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.   See United States v. Lutz, Nos. CR-95-293; CA-99-3663-HNM

(D. Md. Oct. 3, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2