Court Opinion

ID: 180836
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-12-10 16:42:06+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:27:25.635602
License: Public Domain

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

                   INTAMIN, LTD.,
                   Plaintiff-Appellant,

                            v.

       MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
              Defendant-Appellee.
             ____________________

                       2010-1003
                 ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge
Gary A. Feess.
                 ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

   TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los
Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

   JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear,
LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee.
With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S.
CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L.
ROSS.
                 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and
GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2010             /s/ Jan Horbaly
      Date                        Jan Horbaly
                                   Clerk