Court Opinion

ID: 3540502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 22:51:57.860013+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:38:25.282726
License: Public Domain

Dear Secretary Carnahan:
This opinion letter responds to your request dated February 9, 2006, for our review under Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition, submitted by Ron Calzone and Missouri Citizens for Property Rights, to amend Article VI, Section 21 of the Constitution of Missouri, relating to eminent domain.
We approve the petition as to form. But Section 116.332 gives the Secretary of State final authority to approve or reject the petition. Therefore, our approval of the form of the petition does not preclude you from rejecting the petition.
Because our review of the petition is simply for the purpose of determining sufficiency as to form, the fact that we do not reject the petition is not to be construed as a determination that the petition is sufficient as to substance. Likewise, because our review is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or of the objectives of its proponents, or the expression of any view respecting the adequacy or inadequacy of the petition generally.
Very truly yours,
                                   JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Attorney General
Attached is Missouri Attorney General Opinion Letter No. 73-2006 issued on February 21, 2006. For purposes of indexing, we are summarizing the opinion as follows:
  Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition to amend Article VI, Section 21 of the Constitution of Missouri, relating to eminent domain.
We are indexing the opinion under the heading: Initiative Petition Initiatives