Court Opinion

ID: 2879502
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-07 05:10:56.371206+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:43:25.412124
License: Public Domain

i          i       i                                                                       i       i       i

                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                            No. 04-08-00242-CR

                                        Jonathan Lawrence KAHL,
                                                Appellant

                                                       v.

                                           The STATE of Texas,
                                                 Appellee

                       From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
                                   Trial Court No. 2008-CR-2099W
                                Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting:           Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
                   Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
                   Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 25, 2008

DISMISSED

           The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule

25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the

right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, on May 7, 2008, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right
                                                                                      04-08-00242-CR

of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

       On May 7, 2008, appellant’s appellate counsel notified this court that appellant does not have

the right to appeal in this case. In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel

that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

                                          PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

                                                 -2-