Court Opinion

ID: 3592187
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:40:33.342844+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:57:41.652545
License: Public Domain

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was evidence with respect to the condition of this highway for several months prior to the accident, from which the jurors might find neglect on the part of the commissioner of highways in failing to keep the sluiceway at this point in good order and that such neglect caused a more serious defect in the highway in the winter following, than would have occurred otherwise. If the defect complained of could be attributable, solely, to those conditions which usually supervene in the winter season, as the result of atmospheric changes *Page 560 
and of the effect of travel upon accumulations of snow and ice, we should be disinclined to hold that the commissioner of highways was chargeable with culpable neglect.
CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ., concur; VANN, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.