Court Opinion

ID: 5561352
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 00:51:11.801538+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:29.149370
License: Public Domain

Jackson, Chief Justice.
[At the term when a case was tried, a motion for new trial was made. The judge made the rule nisi returnable in vacation, approved the grounds and handed the motion to the clerk, but it was not marked filed. At the time appointed, counsel for respondent appeared and announced that he waived the failure to serve him with a copy or with notice of the time for hearing. Counsel for the movant objected to the hearing, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, it not appearing that any order or consent was had fixing the hearing in vacation, and the motion and rule nisi not appearing to have been filed. The judge stated that he had approved the motion and brief of evidence; and handed them to the clerk during the term, and that, if it did not so appear, it was the fault of the latter. Movant’s counsel still insisted on his objection to the hearing. Counsel for respondent then moved to dismiss the motion for new trial and rule nisi, on the ground that they had never been filed in office. The judge sustained the motion, and movant excepted.]