Court Opinion

ID: 2895906
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-08 00:03:06.783576+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:33.452658
License: Public Domain

NO. 07-06-0449-CV

                              IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                      AT AMARILLO

                                         PANEL D

                                  MARCH 20, 2007
                          ______________________________

                         IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.C., A CHILD
                        _________________________________

             FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

               NO. 2006-535,777; HONORABLE BILL SOWDER, JUDGE
                       _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Kassandra Ellen Cantrell perfected this restricted appeal from an order naming her

and appellees Barbara Sue Adams and Nolan G. Adams joint managing conservators of

Cantrell’s son, E.A.C. Among other rights, the order gave the Adams the exclusive right

to designate E.A.C.’s residence. It also ordered Cantrell to make support payments.

Cantrell executed a waiver of service, and she was not served and did not receive notice

of or participate in any hearing in the case.

       The order also terminated the parental rights of E.A.C.’s presumed father, Jefferson

Alan Nalley, on the basis of his execution of an unrevoked or irrevocable affidavit of

relinquishment. Nalley has not appealed the trial court’s order.
       Cantrell’s brief has been filed, presenting her contentions the trial court’s order must

be reversed because her waiver of service was executed before the Adams filed suit and

because the order was signed before her answer date. Appellees have not yet filed a brief.

Cantrell and appellees now have filed a joint motion asking that we reverse the trial court’s

order and remand the cause.

       We agree the face of the record reflects Cantrell waived service of process by an

instrument executed before suit was brought against her, contrary to statute. See Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 30.001 (Vernon 1997) (proscribing pre-suit waivers of process).

See also Tex. R. Civ. P. 119 (providing for waiver of service “after suit is brought”). The

pre-suit waiver Cantrell signed did not give the court personal jurisdiction over her. Deen

v. Kirk, 508 S.W.2d 70, 71 (Tex. 1974) (orig. proceeding).

       Given this state of the record, we sustain Cantrell’s first issue on appeal. We affirm

that part of the trial court’s order that terminated the parent-child relationship between

Jefferson Alan Nalley and E.A.C. We sever all other claims asserted in this cause, reverse

the trial court’s order except insofar as it terminated the parent-child relationship between

Jefferson Alan Nalley and E.A.C., and remand the cause to the trial court.

                                                   James T. Campbell
                                                       Justice

                                              2