Court Opinion

ID: 746092
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 22:07:05+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:35:26.683259
License: Public Domain

124 F.3d 218
97 CJ C.A.R. 1727
NOTICE:  Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties.  See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Angelo DeHERRERA, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-2122.(D.Ct.No. CR-95-330-JC)
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 26, 1997.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

1
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

2
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  10th Cir.  R. 34.1.9.  The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

3
This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing defendant DeHerrera to a term of imprisonment of 135 months after a plea agreement in which defendant pled guilty to Count V of a superseding indictment, which charged him with accessory after the fact to a carjacking resulting in death.  The district court imposed the sentence within the applicable Sentencing Guideline range and refused to depart downward after a request for a downward departure by the United States.

4
Defendant DeHerrera appeals arguing that the district court should have granted a downward departure based upon U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 arguing that the district judge should have granted defendant the downward departure because of his mitigating role in the underlying offense.  The record makes clear that the district judge knew that he had the power to grant a downward departure.  Downward departures from applicable Sentencing Guideline ranges are left to the sound discretion of the trial court.  It is well settled law in this circuit that absent a misunderstanding on the sentencing judge's part, illegality, or an incorrect application of the guidelines, we will not review the denial of a downward departure.  United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478, 1481 (10th Cir.1990).  We DISMISS this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

*
 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.  This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;  nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.  R. 36.3