Court Opinion

ID: 9534436
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:39:41.151122+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:37.558918
License: Public Domain

HASELTON, J.,
concurring.
I join in the reasoning and holding of the lead opinion. Although I agree that plaintiff is entitled to the relief she seeks on appeal, I write separately to condemn the gratuitously disparaging comments about the trial judge that appear throughout plaintiffs brief.
In Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt, 137 Or App 572, 576, 905 P2d 1177 (1995), we were constrained to make a similar observation about the substance and tenor of an attorney’s argument. It is necessary to do so again for the second time in less than six months. That is twice too often.