Court Opinion

ID: 8294507
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-10-17 10:58:57.153828+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:43:58.653201
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
In this condemnation action, both petitioner and respondent filed motions in limine to exclude certain evidence from the proceedings. The trial judge granted respondent’s motion and denied petitioner’s motion. Petitioner appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. S.C. Dep’t of Transp. v. McDonald’s Corp., Op. No.2006-UP-237 (S.C. Ct.App. filed May 9, 2006). Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from' the decision of the Court of Appeals. We grant the petition, dispense with further briefing, vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and dismiss the appeal.
*92A motion in limine is generally not considered a final order on the admissibility of evidence and, for that reason, is not immediately appealable. See, e.g. State v. Floyd, 295 S.C. 518, 369 S.E.2d 842 (1988). Because the appeal should have been dismissed, the Court of Appeals erred in addressing the merits of the appeal. Accordingly, we vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals and dismiss the appeal as the order on the motions in limine is not immediately appealable.
VACATED AND DISMISSED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.