Court Opinion

ID: 7509959
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 04:37:58.357692+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:23:23.903173
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his conviction for sale or delivery of cannabis raising as his sole point on appeal the trial court’s alleged error in refusing to instruct the jury on the maximum and minimum penalties as required by Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), rehearing denied February 27, 1981. Appellant’s argument is clearly frivolous since the jury was instructed as required by Tascano, supra. (T-843-846). AFFIRMED.
SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.