Court Opinion

ID: 5134451
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-12-13 20:01:10.456234+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:23:44.033401
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 21-11541      Date Filed: 12/13/2021   Page: 1 of 4

                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                            In the
         United States Court of Appeals
                 For the Eleventh Circuit

                   ____________________

                         No. 21-11541
                   Non-Argument Calendar
                   ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENNIE L. GILES,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                   ____________________

          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Northern District of Florida
           D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00442-LC-EMT-1
                   ____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11541          Date Filed: 12/13/2021      Page: 2 of 4

2                       Opinion of the Court                   21-11541

Before: WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and
ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
       Bennie Giles, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of
his motion for a further reduction of his sentence based on the
amendment to section 924(c) in the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.
No. 115-391, § 403(a), 132 Stat. 5194, 5221–22. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c). The United States moves for summary affirmance and to
stay the briefing schedule. We grant the motion for summary affir-
mance and deny as moot the motion to stay the briefing schedule.
       In 2006, Giles pleaded guilty to three counts of carjacking,
18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 2119, two counts of Hobbs Act robbery, id. §§ 2,
1951, and five counts of using and carrying a firearm during and in
relation to his crimes of violence, id. §§ 2, 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). He faced
statutory mandatory sentencing ranges of ten years to life impris-
onment for one firearm offense, id. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii), and of 25
years to life imprisonment for his four additional firearm offenses,
with each sentence running consecutively to each other and to his
other sentences, id. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), (c)(1)(C)(i), (c)(1)(D)(ii); see
United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2324 n.1 (2019). As a career
offender, Giles had an advisory guideline range of 1,471 to 1,508
months of imprisonment. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(c).
     The district court sentenced Giles to 720 months of impris-
onment. The district court imposed concurrent sentences of 60
USCA11 Case: 21-11541         Date Filed: 12/13/2021     Page: 3 of 4

21-11541                Opinion of the Court                         3

months for each of Giles’s carjacking and Hobbs Act robbery
crimes. Based on Giles’s substantial assistance to the government,
the district court departed downward by half from the low end of
his statutory mandatory minimum sentences for his firearm of-
fenses. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)(1). The district court imposed a
sentence of 60 months for the first of Giles’s firearm offenses and a
sentence of 150 months of imprisonment for each of his four addi-
tional firearm offenses, and ordered that the sentences run consec-
utively to each other and to his other sentences.
        In 2020, Giles moved for compassionate release and for a
sentence reduction based on the amendment to section 924(c) in
section 403(a), 132 Stat. at 5221–22. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). He ar-
gued that the amendment, which eliminated a mandatory consec-
utive sentence for “second or subsequent [firearm] conviction[s]”
in a single prosecution, 132 Stat. at 5221–22, and that his rehabilita-
tion in prison warranted a reduction of his sentence and his imme-
diate release. The United States opposed Giles’s motions on the
grounds that the amendment did not apply retroactively, id.
§ 403(b), 132 Stat. at 5222, or constitute an extraordinary and com-
pelling reason to reduce his sentence under the policy statements
in section 1B1.13 of the Sentencing Guidelines.
      The district court reduced Giles’s sentence by 180 months
based on the compassionate relief statute and denied further relief.
The district court denied Giles relief under the First Step Act be-
cause the amendment did not apply retroactively. Nevertheless,
the district court decided that the amendment constituted an
USCA11 Case: 21-11541        Date Filed: 12/13/2021     Page: 4 of 4

4                      Opinion of the Court                21-11541

extraordinary and compelling reason to grant Giles relief under the
“catch-all” provision of section 1B1.13.
        Summary affirmance is appropriate because Giles’s “appeal
is frivolous.” See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158,
1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The district court could not further reduce
Giles’s sentence because it lacked authority to reduce his sentence
at all. The amendment to section 924(c) applies only “if a sentence
for the offense has not been imposed as of such date of enactment.”
132 Stat. at 5222. That amendment was inapplicable to Giles be-
cause he was sentenced more than a decade before its enactment.
See United States v. Puentes, 803 F.3d 597, 605-06 (11th Cir. 2015)
(stating a district court may modify a defendant’s sentence “only
when authorized by a statute or rule”). And while Giles’s appeal
was pending, we held in United States v. Bryant, 996 F.3d 1243,
1247–48 (11th Cir. 2021), that the policy statement in section
1B1.13 governs a motion for compassionate release and that a dis-
trict court cannot “develop ‘other reasons’ that might justify a re-
duction in a defendant’s sentence.” So, the district court erred by
reducing Giles’s sentence. See id. at 1262. But we do not disturb
Giles’s sentence because the United States admits it “did not appeal
the district court’s order and cannot challenge it here.”
       Because the position of the United States is clearly right re-
garding the outcome of this appeal, we GRANT its motion to sum-
marily affirm and DENY AS MOOT the accompanying motion to
stay the briefing schedule.