Court Opinion

ID: 4324362
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-10-25 14:39:58.856922+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:24:29.846452
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-18-00490-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JULIO CESAR RAMIREZ,                                                        Appellant,

                                           v.

JAIME CRISTOBAL RAMIREZ,                            Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the 445th District Court
                  of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                       MEMORANDUM OPINION
   Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa
             Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

      Appellant, Julio Cesar Ramirez attempted to perfect an appeal from an order

signed on May 11, 2018, in cause no. 2014-DCL-3821-I. Upon review of the documents

before the Court, it appeared that there was no final, appealable judgment dated May 11,

2018. On September 10, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P.
37.1, 42.3.   Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice.

       The Cameron County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no judgment was

entered on May 11, 2018. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have

jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute.

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

       The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.     Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c).

                                                                 NORA L. LONGORIA
                                                                 Justice

Delivered and filed the
25th day of October, 2018.

                                              2