Court Opinion

ID: 1575136
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 06:49:29.163014+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:13:13.165475
License: Public Domain

308 S.W.3d 306 (2010)
Kevin HARMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93461.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 20, 2010.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
*307 Chris Koster, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Prior report: 273 S.W.3d 584.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Harman (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).