Court Opinion

ID: 8450936
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 01:17:10.746949+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:59.504131
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM:
Eric L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 5:01-cr-00004-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.