Court Opinion

ID: 9375238
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-25 21:00:46.441245+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:57.067694
License: Public Domain

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7148      Doc: 15         Filed: 02/24/2023    Pg: 1 of 2

                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                                              No. 22-7148

        FRANKIE LEE MCGEE,

                            Petitioner - Appellant,

                     v.

        WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

                            Respondent - Appellee.

        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:21-cv-02777-RMG)

        Submitted: February 21, 2023                                 Decided: February 24, 2023

        Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

        Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

        Frankie Lee McGee, Appellant Pro Se.

        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7148      Doc: 15         Filed: 02/24/2023     Pg: 2 of 2

        PER CURIAM:

               Frankie Lee McGee seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report recommending

        that relief on McGee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition be denied. This court may exercise

        jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and

        collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

        Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The decision McGee seeks to appeal is neither a final

        order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

        appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                      DISMISSED

                                                    2