Court Opinion

ID: 6946019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-24 01:25:42.494386+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:07:54.936781
License: Public Domain

Smith, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: This was a proceeding under the attachment laws against the plaintiff in error as a non-resident debtor. Several objections have been urged against the regularity of the proceedings in the Circuit Court. Without noticing any other than that relating to the insufficiency of the attachment bond, it will be apparent that the objection urged against the bond must prevail. The recital in the condition of the bond is essentially defective in that portion of it which attempts to describe the attachment, and the return of it. It describes no Court from which it has been issued, nor to which it is to be returned, nor the term to which it is made returnable. It is consequently so wholly uncertain that it may be well doubted whether an action could ever be maintained on it, in case of a breach of its condition. The proceedings, however, being ex parte and in rem, and the judgment being by default because of no appearance by the defendants, the rule which requires a strict conformity to the statute modes of proceeding, must prevail. The judgment is reversed with costs. Judgment reversed.