Court Opinion

ID: 8464017
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-05 08:11:27.501177+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:49:11.956889
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Sims appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sims, No. 7:02-cr-00248-GRA-13, 2009 WL 24233 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 We consider Sims’ notice of appeal to have been timely filed. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).