Court Opinion

ID: 3894932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 09:26:31.146464+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:51:50.547150
License: Public Domain

The defendant was a partner in the late firm of Adam Shepherd  Co. The ground of this action was a note in these words: "Due James Russell three hundred and two dollars, being in part of a note settled this day, given by James Robertson to Stephen Hopkins, dated 4th of March, 1802; the above account being principal in part, and interest up to this day." Signed, "Robert Drake, for Adam Shepherd  Co., February 1, 1806."
The note having been proved by the subscribing witness, Drake was offered as a witness, and, upon being objected to, OVERTON, J., said he was not a *Page 456 
competent witness to prove his own agency as against one of the firm. Jones, the defendant, and James Robertson, were acknowledged to be partners of that firm. An agency may be proved by parol, and though Drake, if an agent, might prove his agency in demands of the company against others, he was inclined to think the rule did not apply in a case situated as the present.1
It was then proved that he was the agent of the concern in settling the books and all other business respecting the iron-works copartnership.
The defendant's counsel then contended that it appeared from the face of the note to be a private debt of Robertson's that was settled, and that Drake had exceeded his authority. Drake proved the copartnership had been dissolved previously to the giving of the note. That Robertson who had been one of the partners wrote to him to settle it. It was insisted that the letter should be produced.
1 9 Ves. Jr. 250; 2 Johns. 577; Sch.  Lef. 31; 2 Johns. 189; 2 Dall. 246; 2 Mass. l06; 1 Caines, 167.