Court Opinion

ID: 746009
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-17 22:05:57+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:37.300844
License: Public Domain

124 F.3d 214
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rogelio LOPEZ-SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-30018.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 1997.**Decided Sept. 12, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-95-00091-6-HJF;  Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding.
Before:  HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

1
MEMORANDUM*

2
Rogelio Lopez-Soto appeals his sentence for his guilty plea conviction to distribution of cocaine and unlawful entry in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1).  Lopez's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.  Because our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for review, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of counsel to withdraw.

**
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.  See Fed.  R.App. P. 34(a);  9th Cir.  R. 34-4

*
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.  R. 36-3