Court Opinion

ID: 9552323
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 19:08:46.540605+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:26:07.615370
License: Public Domain

SCHWAB, C. J.,
concurring.
I wish to note that by concurring in the majority opinion I do not wish to be recorded as implying that the arrest on the outstanding warrant was improper or that the fruits of a search incident to a lawful arrest should always be suppressed if the initial stop was unlawful. Despite State v. Crossen, 21 Or App 835, 536 P2d 1263, Sup Ct review denied (1975), I think the contrary result can arguably be supported. I concur here solely because the state seeks to justify the search and the resulting seizure of the weapon solely on the basis that the stop was proper and not on the basis of the fruits of a search incidental to a lawful arrest.