Court Opinion

ID: 7597627
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 06:55:27.510311+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:24:45.286248
License: Public Domain

CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would “adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case.” See Perez v. Unger, 571 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.