Court Opinion

ID: 9388301
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-04-20 16:00:50.869541+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:18:19.628288
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 22-2734
                        ___________________________

                             United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                           v.

                                  Jason Woodring

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
                                   ____________

                             Submitted: April 17, 2023
                               Filed: April 20, 2023
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Federal prisoner Jason Woodring appeals the district court’s 1 order granting
the government’s motion for $1,000.87 from Woodring’s inmate trust account to be

      1
       The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
applied to his restitution obligations. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
this court affirms.

       Contrary to Woodring’s contention on appeal, the district court properly
considered evidence showing that he had received multiple stimulus payments,
including a $1,200 economic impact payment in December 2020. This court
declines to consider arguments that Woodring raises for the first time on appeal.
See Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. v. Wall St. Equity Grp., Inc., 809 F.3d 1018, 1022 (8th
Cir. 2016) (appellate court ordinarily does not consider argument raised for first time
on appeal).

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________

                                         -2-