Court Opinion

ID: 6336932
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-02 14:13:11.956781+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:21:58.833330
License: Public Domain

FILED
                                                                                May 02, 2022
                                                                                08:25 AM(CT)
                                                                             TENNESSEE COURT OF
                                                                            WORKERS' COMPENSATION
                                                                                   CLAIMS

      TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
        IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
                       AT MURFREESBORO

 SCOTT WILSON,                               ) Docket No. 2021-05-0344
         Employee,                           )
 v.                                          )
                                             )
 AMERICAN PAPER & TWINE CO.,                 ) State File No. 18268-2020
        Employer,                            )
 And                                         )
                                             )
 ACCIDENT FUND GENERAL INS. CO.,             ) Judge Dale Tipps
             Insurance Carrier.              )

             EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS

       The Court held an Expedited Hearing on April 27, 2022, to determine whether Mr.
Wilson is entitled to additional medical treatment, specifically treatment for his carpal
tunnel/cubital tunnel syndrome. The Court finds that Mr. Wilson is likely to prove this
condition is a natural consequence of his compensable shoulder injury. Therefore, the
Court holds that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.

                                    History of Claim

       The parties agreed that Mr. Wilson suffered a compensable left-shoulder injury on
January 14, 2020. American Paper provided medical benefits, including rotator cuff repair
surgery by Dr. Joseph Wieck.

        Mr. Wilson testified that after the surgery, he had severe numbness and tingling in
his left hand, something that he had not experienced before. He reported the problem to
Dr. Wieck at his two-week appointment, and the doctor told him it was probably caused
by inflammation from the surgery and that it should resolve.

      About six weeks after surgery, while Mr. Wilson was still on light duty, he had a
workplace fall on June 24. He returned to Dr. Wieck, who found no new injury. Mr.
Wilson told him again about the hand numbness, and Dr. Wieck said those symptoms
would probably improve after he started physical therapy. When the problem persisted for
another three months, Dr. Wieck ordered an EMG test.

       Dr. Wieck then left his medical practice, and Dr. Joseph Shaffer assumed Mr.
Wilson’s care. Dr. Shaffer reviewed the EMG results and diagnosed carpal tunnel
syndrome but said that “this would not be attributed to his work injury.” He then placed
Mr. Wilson at maximum medical improvement, assigned an impairment rating, and
released him with no restrictions.

       As Mr. Wilson’s symptoms persisted, American Paper provided a panel of hand
specialists for a second opinion, from which he selected Dr. Paul Abbey. Dr. Abbey
examined Mr. Wilson and diagnosed both carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndrome in the
left arm. His treatment note says, “I believe that the carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel are
UNRELATED to work. They are a result of his prior rotator cuff surgery.” (Emphasis in
original).

        American Paper then sent a questionnaire to Dr. Abbey that said Mr. Wilson was
“being evaluated for numbness in his left wrist/hand after an incident on 6/24/20 when he
stepped off a trailer and fell approximately 5 feet.” It then asked whether the hand and
wrist symptoms were causally related to that work injury. Dr. Abbey checked the response
that said, “I do not believe that [these] symptoms are causally related to work and this is a
personal, pre-existing condition.”

       Dr. Abbey gave a deposition and answered questions about the cause of Mr.
Wilson’s carpal/cubital tunnel symptoms. He said he had often seen patients who had this
condition after shoulder surgery and that Mr. Wilson’s surgery was a contributing factor in
this case. However, he was not able to say that the rotator cuff surgery was greater than
fifty percent responsible for this condition. He also confirmed that Mr. Wilson was a
candidate for carpal tunnel release surgery and possibly cubital tunnel surgery.

       At the conclusion of the hearing, Mr. Wilson requested medical treatment for his
carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome. American Paper contended that he was not entitled to this
treatment because he presented no medical proof that his employment was the primary
cause of these conditions.

                           Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

       For the Court to grant Mr. Wilson’s requests, he must prove he is likely to prevail
at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v.
Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar.
27, 2015).
        American Paper did not contest the compensability of the shoulder injury but
contended that Mr. Wilson is not entitled to treatment for his carpal/cubital tunnel
syndrome, which he claimed is the result of his shoulder surgery. Thus, the specific
questions before the Court are: 1) what standard is used in cases where an employee alleges
an injury that flows from the primary compensable injury; and 2) whether Mr. Wilson is
likely to meet that standard.

       American Paper relied on the standard in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-
102(14), which requires Mr. Wilson to show that his alleged injuries arose primarily out of
and in the course and scope of his employment. This includes the requirement that he must
show, “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that [the incident] contributed more than
fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . disablement or need for medical treatment,
considering all causes.” Because Dr. Abbey was unable to say that the rotator cuff surgery
was greater than fifty percent responsible for the carpal tunnel syndrome, American Paper
maintains that Mr. Wilson has not met his burden of proving compensability of that
condition. However, this is not the correct analysis.

        The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board recently addressed this question in
Braden v. Mohawk Indus. Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 11 (Mar. 1, 2022).
In a lengthy exploration of the “direct and natural consequences rule,” the Board reiterated
its previous holding that “[w]hen the primary injury is shown to have arisen out of and in
the course of employment, every natural consequence that flows from the injury likewise
arises out of the employment. Therefore, all the medical consequences and sequelae that
flow from the primary injury are compensable.” It concluded that an employee need not
prove that the secondary injury was primarily caused by the work injury. Id. at *11.

       Applying this standard to Mr. Wilson’s claim, the Court is faced with two medical
opinions. The first comes from Dr. Shaffer, who said that the carpel tunnel syndrome
“would not be attributed to his work injury.” Again, however, the issue is not whether the
carpal tunnel syndrome is attributable to the work injury but whether it is a natural
consequence of it. Dr. Shaffer’s opinion does not answer this question.

       This leaves the opinion of Dr. Abbey. Although he was unable to identify Mr.
Wilson’s shoulder surgery as the primary cause of his carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome, his
treatment note said that these conditions were “a result of his prior rotator cuff surgery.”
He reiterated this opinion in his deposition when he said the shoulder surgery was a
contributing factor to the carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome.1

       Dr. Abbey’s unrebutted opinion is sufficient to establish that Mr. Wilson’s
carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome is a natural consequence of his injury. Therefore, the Court

1
 The Court disregards Dr. Abbey’s response to the questionnaire because it asked the wrong question –
whether the later workplace fall in June was the cause of Mr. Wilson’s hand and wrist conditions.
finds that he is likely to prove entitlement to treatment for these conditions.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

   1. American Paper shall continue to provide medical benefits, including treatment with
      Dr. Abbey for Mr. Wilson’s carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome.

   2. A status hearing will take place on July 13, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. The
      parties must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025 to participate. Failure
      to call might result in a determination of issues without your participation.

   3. Unless an interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
      with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
      of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The
      Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by
      email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day
      after entry of this Order. Failure to submit confirmation within seven business days
      may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding
      compliance, contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at
      WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

       ENTERED May 2, 2022.

                                    _____________________________________
                                    Judge Dale Tipps
                                    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
                                       APPENDIX

Exhibits:
   1. Mr. Wilson’s affidavit
   2. Transcript of Dr. Paul Abbey’s deposition
   3. Medical records attached to American Paper’s Exhibit List

Technical record:
   1. Petition for Benefit Determination
   2. Dispute Certification Notice
   3. Request for Expedited Hearing
   4. Employer’s Pre-Hearing Brief
   5. Employer’s Witness List
   6. Employer’s Exhibit List

                           CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on May
2, 2022.

  Name                     Certified   Fax     Email   Service sent to:
                            Mail
  Scott Wilson,               X                  X     227 Peebles Drive
  Employee                                             Smyrna, TN 37167
                                                       swilson@aptcommerce.com
  Gordon Aulgur,                                 X     gordon.aulgur@afgroup.com
  Employer’s Attorney                                  cc: susan.block@afgroup.com

                                           ______________________________________
                                           PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
                                           wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
                           Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

     If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

   1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
      Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the
      date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
      serve a copy upon all parties.

   2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
      calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
      any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
      alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
      website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
      completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
      result in dismissal of the appeal.

   3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
      from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
      the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
      it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
      Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
      parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
      the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
      Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
      Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
      concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
      a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

   4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
      business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
      party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
      days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
      statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
      expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
      the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
      argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
                                              NOTICE OF APPEAL
                                      Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
                                        www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
                                        wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

                                                                                  Docket No.: ________________________

                                                                                  State File No.: ______________________

                                                                                  Date of Injury: _____________________

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employee

         v.

         ___________________________________________________________________________
         Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
                         [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties
Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
Email: __________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                           * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
Email: _________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
                              * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

                                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

                                                           ______________________________________________
                                                            [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082