Court Opinion

ID: 1012713
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 20:49:12.162647+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:39:14.696543
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Ronald I. Nance appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Postal Service on his employment discrimination complaint. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. The doctrine of res judicata bars the only claim Nance advances on appeal—a claim of Rehabilitation Act discrimination. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Nance v. Potter,
  
  No. CA-01-1083-1, 225 F.Supp.2d 638 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED