Court Opinion

ID: 4382053
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-03-29 00:00:18.828191+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:29:47.870833
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-10949      Document: 00514893142         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/28/2019

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                                                            March 28, 2019
                                    No. 18-10949
                                 Conference Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NYKEES EARL CAMPBELL, also known as #1, also known as NaNa, also
known as Ny-Nizzle,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:17-CR-567-1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Nykees Earl Campbell has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Campbell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-10949    Document: 00514893142    Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/28/2019

                                No. 18-10949

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

                                      2