Court Opinion

ID: 9828057
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 18:03:16.75681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:09:49.010766
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing.
The questions presented in the motion for rehearing have been reconsidered, but we find no reason for not adhering to the rulings heretofore made. We correct the statement in our former opinion to the effect that the ease of Allen v. Brunner, 33 Tex. Civ. App. 128, 75 S. W. 821, did not involve any question of priority of liens. The thought intended to be expressed was that, while each party asserted a lien, the appellant did not controvert the fact that a landlord’s lien was superior to an attachment lien, but contended that the landlord in that case had no lien.
Motion overruled.