Court Opinion

ID: 9878660
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-27 17:30:58.191049+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:47:39.130064
License: Public Domain

Hoffman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part
  

   {¶ 56} I concur in the majority's analysis and rejection of Appellant's arguments challenging the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction and Appellee's standing. I further concur in the majority's analysis and decision the trial court abused its discretion in applying the doctrine of laches to this matter.
   
    1
   

   {¶ 57} I respectfully dissent, in part, from the majority's final disposition. I would remand the matter to the trial court to determine whether Appellant was in contempt of court with regard to the STRS payment. I would enter a final judgment finding Appellant in contempt with regard to the $37,500 bank account and remand the matter to the trial court to determine the appropriate sanction.
  

    I find the majority's citation to
    
     State ex rel. Doran v. Preble Cty. Bd of Commers.
    
    ,
    
     2013-Ohio-3579
    
    ,
    
     995 N.E.2d 239
    
    , unnecessary.