Court Opinion

ID: 8763896
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 12:17:27.885504+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:01:44.363885
License: Public Domain

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
I dissent. In my opinion there was an express warranty as to the condition of dryness, as well as to the quality, of the lumber, and the defendant was not precluded by accepting the lumber, after an opportunity to discover that it did not comply with the warranty, from recovering by way of recoupment the damages resulting from the breach. See Bagley v. Cleveland Rolling Mill Co., 22 Blatchf. 342, 21 Fed. 159, and Zabriskie v. C. V. R. R. Co., 131 N. Y. 72, 29 N. E. 1006.