Court Opinion

ID: 2962511
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 20:58:38.379182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:09:41.601714
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          March 21, 1994        [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ___________________          No. 93-1627                                                AMERICA MAZA,                                Plaintiff, Appellant,                                          v.                   SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.,                                Defendants, Appellees.                                  __________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]                                             ___________________                                 ___________________                                        Before                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,                                         ___________                         Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.                                              ______________                                 ___________________               America Maza on brief pro se.               ____________                                  __________________                                  __________________                      Per  Curiam.        We  affirm  the   dismissal  of                      ___________            appellant's  pro se complaint  substantially for  the reasons                         ___ __            stated in the district court's  memorandum and order of April            26, 1993.  Appellant's claims against the Secretary of Health            and Human Services  are time-barred under 42  U.S.C.   405(g)            and  the  applicable regulations.    20  C.F.R.     416.1455,            .1481.  See also    416.1405, .1421.  There is no  indication                    ___ ____            that  the Secretary found that good reasons exist to allow an            extention of time  for a  late filing for  judicial review.              See    416.1482, .1411.  Otherwise, the complaint suggests no            ___            cognizable federal cause of action.                      Affirmed.                      _________                                         -3-