Court Opinion

ID: 9686303
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 15:40:55.506594+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:18:17.461122
License: Public Domain

SACKETT, Judge
(specially concurring).
I concur specially. I concur with the trial court’s decision to award Gary primary physical custody. The evidence shows he is the superior parent.
*70I find, as does the majority, the issue of whether the trial court incorrectly failed to continue the trial, precluding Tamera from presenting additional evidence, was not preserved for review. Tamera failed to make any record at the trial level concerning the additional testimony she now claims she should have been permitted to introduce.
While it could be argued our responsibility to protect the child’s interest demands a remand, the evidence showing Gary to be the superior parent is so strong that on this record I do not find it necessary.