Court Opinion

ID: 4237902
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2018-01-19 22:00:26.960434+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:30:23.067773
License: Public Domain

NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JAN 19 2018
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    16-30008

                Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00008-WFN

 v.
                                                MEMORANDUM*
DEANDRE DERRICK MEIGHAN,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Eastern District of Washington
                 Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before:      REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

      Deandre Derrick Meighan appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 100-month concurrent sentences imposed following his guilty-plea

convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a

controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meighan’s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided Meighan the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

         Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

         Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

         AFFIRMED.

                                          2                                   16-30008