Court Opinion

ID: 3596565
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:43:48.661025+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:16:01.857813
License: Public Domain

The decedent died on the 17th of December, 1894, a resident of Lakewood, New Jersey, leaving a will by which he gave substantially all of his estate to certain nieces and their children. His will was admitted to probate in the *Page 36 
city of New York on the 5th of April, 1895. His personal property, valued at $239,931.14, consisted of stocks and bonds of foreign and domestic corporations, mortgages upon lands in this state, and moneys deposited in banks in this state. All of the securities, with some unimportant exceptions, were habitually kept by the decedent in a safe deposit vault in this state, in charge of an agent in this state. The stocks of foreign corporations were excluded by the appraiser, while the bonds of foreign corporations were included by him. The decision of the surrogate, sustaining the appraisal, was affirmed by the Appellate Division upon the same grounds as in the Whiting
case. There is no distinction between the two cases, except that in the latter it did not appear whether the foreign bonds were registered or coupon, while in the case in hand there were both kinds. I think that the decision of this case is governed by the rules laid down in the Whiting and Houdayer cases, and that further discussion of the subject is unnecessary.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.