Court Opinion

ID: 9550021
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 18:27:53.838747+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:21:12.103387
License: Public Domain

JACKSON, Judge
(concurring specially):
I conclude that the articulable objective facts known to Deputy Wooten when he seized Hansen did not support a reasonable suspicion that Hansen was engaged in criminal activity. Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of Hansen’s motion to suppress the evidence found in her pack was clearly erroneous. State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 942 (Utah App.1988); accord State v. Mendoza, 748 P.2d 181 (Utah 1987); State v. Ashe, 745 P.2d 1255 (Utah 1987).