Court Opinion

ID: 9558529
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 17:11:30.819551+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:22.060982
License: Public Domain

LEE, J.,
concurring.
I concur because the county failed to prove that defendant’s "mobile home” is a "trailer house.” We erred in Clackamas County v. Ague, 27 Or App 515, 556 P2d 1386 (1976), Sup Ct review denied (1977), when we equated "mobile home” with "trailer house”— to that extent Ague and its progeny should be modified. Technological evolution requires an appropriate definition of "mobile home.” I agree with the dissent that the issue of vagueness should not be raised.