Court Opinion

ID: 7778054
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-30 21:06:43.941228+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:28:09.608015
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bolender v. State, 658 So.2d 82 (Fla.1995); Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). As this court did in Alexander, we certify the same question of great public importance:
ARE ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ABOUT THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT’S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION COGNIZABLE AS AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM?
Affirmed; question certified.
WHATLEY, STRINGER, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.