Court Opinion

ID: 6537491
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-19 22:12:56.193061+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:55:42.369665
License: Public Domain

By the Court, Dickinson, J. The only question presented for our consideration, is, as to the effect of the demurrer, no defect or imperfection in the pleadings being set out. The plaintiff below certainly does set out facts sufficient to entitle him to a recovery upon the writing obligatory for $595. Therefore, as the defendants omitted to specify in their demurrer in what respect the declaration is defective or insufficient, the Circuit Court rightly overruled it. Davis vs. Gibson, 2 Ark. R. 115. The plaintiffs in error, however, relied upon their demurrer, and the Circuit Court was only authorized to give judgment in accordance with the breach in the declaration, which is confined exclusively to the debt demanded in the' declaration, and contains no averment of the nonpayment of the interest; consequently, as there was a special contract to pay at a certain rate of interest, the allegation in the breach must be governed by the nature of the stipulation, and be co-extensive with it. There being an entire omission of any breach as to the interest, the judgment of the Circuit Court is clearly erroneous, having been given for more than the pleadings warranted. Judgment reversed.