Court Opinion

ID: 1006462
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:11:53.446168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:46.153312
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 01-7738

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

ERIC CREIGHTON SAMPSON,

                                              Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. William L. Osteen, District
Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-95-31-3, CA-99-127-3)

Submitted:   January 17, 2002             Decided:   January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Creighton Sampson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Eric Creighton Sampson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).   We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Sampson, Nos. CR-95-31-3;

CA-99-127-3 (W.D.N.C. filed July 25, 2001; entered July 27, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          DISMISSED

                                 2