Court Opinion

ID: 8422349
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-03 22:33:55.428303+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:48:25.832073
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Lewis Pullen, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for electronic monitoring/home incarceration, denying his motion for personal recognizance bond pending appeal, and denying his motion for reconsideration for electronic monitoring/home confinement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pullen, No. CR-01-133 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2003; Sept. 26, 2003; Nov. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED