Court Opinion

ID: 8069244
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 11:16:05.516041+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:38:13.914922
License: Public Domain

MacLEAN, J.
That “the decision of the trial justice was contrary to the evidence, and the weight of the evidence,” is'principally the point upon which the plaintiff rests its appeal from the determination in favor of the defendant in an accident case, in which the veracity of the witnesses for their respective sides was passed upon by the learned trial justice, who, as he aptly says, reached the conclusion that the evidence preponderated in favor of the defendant, not in regard to the quantity of the testimony, nor the number of witnesses, but in reference to the quality of the evidence; adding that no one who heard the testimony of the only witness called for the defendant, and observed his demeanor on the stand, could doubt the man’s veracity, while, on the other hand, the testimony of most of the witnesses for the plaintiff was given in a halting and unsatisfactory manner, and did not appeal to the intelligence of .the court. The judgment should be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.