Court Opinion

ID: 7421291
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-29 02:42:31.279045+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:22:20.665257
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *254there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied
: The attorney for the respondent Raymond .S. Czernis is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.