Court Opinion

ID: 3568674
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:18:09.510168+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:40:54.330043
License: Public Domain

I vote to reverse because the case of Bergin v. Ganley,107 N.J.L. 243, does not apply to the instant case, because there was no suit pending in the Supreme Court, within the reasoning of that case, when judgment was entered in the District Court action.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.
For reversal — DONGES, J. 1.