Court Opinion

ID: 9893311
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-26 16:11:59.672899+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:02:12.840637
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan, 2023-Ohio-3890.]

                               COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

                             EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE EX REL., DANIEL WEAVER,                          :

                 Relator,                                      No. 113194
                                                       :
                 v.
                                                       :
JUDGE BRENDAN SHEEHAN
ADMINISTRATIVE/PRESIDING
JUDGE,                                                 :

                 Respondent.                           :

                                JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

                 JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
                 DATED: October 20, 2023

                                          Writ of Procedendo
                                          Motion No. 568555
                                          Order No. 568668

                                            Appearances:

                 Deanna Robertson, for relator.

                 Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
                 Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting
                 Attorney, for respondent.

EMANUELLA D. GROVES, J.:

                   Daniel Weaver, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of

procedendo. Weaver seeks an order from this court that compels Judge Brendan
Sheehan, the respondent, to render a ruling with regard to an application for

expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction, filed November 6, 2020, in State

v. Weaver, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-20-654316-A. Judge Sheehan has filed a motion

for summary judgment that is granted.

              Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of judgment

entry, journalized October 12, 2023, which demonstrates that Judge Sheehan has

granted Weaver’s application for expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction in

CR-20-654316-A.     Relief is unwarranted because the request for a writ of

procedendo is moot. Procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has

already been performed. State ex rel. Ames v. Pokorny, 164 Ohio St.3d 538, 2021-

Ohio-2070, 173 N.E.3d 1208; Thompson v. Donnelly, 155 Ohio St.3d 184, 2018-

Ohio-4073, 119 N.E.3d 1292; State ex rel. S.Y.C. v. Floyd, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.

109602, 2020-Ohio-5189. See also State ex rel. Williams v. Croce, 153 Ohio St.3d

348, 2018-Ohio-2703, 106 N.E.3d 55; State ex rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court

of Common Pleas, 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013-Ohio-1911, 989 N.E.2d 49; State ex rel.

Fontanella v. Kontos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220.

              Writ denied.

________________________
EMANUELLA D. GROVES, JUDGE

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and
MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR