Court Opinion

ID: 2971900
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-22 16:41:43.897918+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:15:20.438101
License: Public Domain

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
                              File Name: 05a0130n.06
                              Filed: February 16, 2005

                                                 Case No. 03-6514

                                UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                     FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

 FEDEX CORPORATION; FEDERAL                                      )
 EXPRESS CORPORATION, and                                        )
 Subsidiaries,                                                   )
                                                                 )        ON APPEAL FROM THE
             Plaintiffs-Appellees,                               )        UNITED STATES DISTRICT
                                                                 )        COURT FOR THE WESTERN
                    v.                                           )        DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
                                                                 )
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                       )
                                                                 )
             Defendant-Appellant.                                )
                                                                 )
 _______________________________________                         )

BEFORE: NELSON and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; COLLIER*, District Judge.

         ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals the district court’s

order granting judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees FedEx Corp. and subsidiaries (“FedEx”)

for overpayment of taxes in the amount of $66,474,287.10 plus interest thereon. FedEx, a common

carrier, paid $70,000,000 in taxes and accrued interest pursuant to an Internal Revenue Service

determination that it was required to capitalize, rather than currently deduct, expenses attributable

to off-wing maintenance of its jet aircraft engines and auxiliary power units incurred during tax

years 1993 and 1994. To perform this maintenance, technicians would remove the engine from the

aircraft, clean it, and make minor repairs. Finding that the maintenance performed on the engines

and auxiliary power units constituted incidental repairs that did not appreciably prolong the life of

         *
         The Honorable Curtis L. Collier, district judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Tennessee, sitting by designation.
the aircraft, the district court held that FedEx was entitled to deduct such maintenance costs that

were incurred during tax years 1993 through 1994 and entered a judgment compensating FedEx for

its overpayment of taxes.

        After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs and counsels’

arguments, we are convinced that the district court did not err. We cannot improve upon the district

court’s opinion, which carefully and correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised, and

clearly articulates the reasons underlying its decision. Issuance of a full written opinion by this court

would therefore serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s

opinion, we AFFIRM.

                                                   2