Court Opinion

ID: 993825
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 00:13:30.252241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:55.426354
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-2097

DENNIS M. ROACH,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

WARREN BURKHART,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-96-2755-8-13AK)

Submitted:   December 11, 1997         Decided:     December 23, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis M. Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Alan Norton, BALLENGER,
FEDDER, CAIN & NORTON, Seneca, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Roach v. Burkhart, No. CA-96-2755-8-13AK (D.S.C.
July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                2