Court Opinion

ID: 3007165
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-06 00:00:43.868284+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:16.410024
License: Public Domain

Case: 15-40080      Document: 00513218975         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/05/2015

           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 15-40080                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                          October 5, 2015
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANDRA QUINTINA CHINO-LAZARO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 5:14-CR-27

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sandra Quintina
Chino-Lazaro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chino-Lazaro has not filed a timely
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-40080   Document: 00513218975    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/05/2015

                               No. 15-40080

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
All other outstanding motions are DENIED.

                                     2