Court Opinion

ID: 9680289
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:28:29.204745+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:17:27.513526
License: Public Domain

On Motion for Rehearing
In our original opinion we stated that four of the children, Gustave Frederick Kuehn, Erna Edna Kuehn Tanner, Lilly Mabel Kuehn Pipkin, and Peter Julius Kuehn filed the instant suit to enforce the deed of their parents and for a partition of the property. We correct our statement. There were in fact five children and we, in the hereinabove designation, inadvertently left out the name of one of the said children, to-wit: SAMUEL CLAUDE KUEHN.
We further stated that “The judgment of the trial court, insofar as it divests any of the eight surviving brothers or sisters of Anna Kallina Kuehn of an undivided one-eighth fee interest in surface tract No. 9 and an undivided one-eighth fee interest in that mineral estate previously conveyed to Frances Kallina Kuehn by the source deed, must be reversed.” We also correct this statement in that the individual designated in such sentence is correctly named' Frances Kallina Kuehn. The sentence will now read “ * * * eight surviving brothers or sisters of Frances Kallina Kuehn of an undivided one-eighth * *
Appellees’ motion for rehearing is overruled.