Court Opinion

ID: 9369378
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-08 17:02:40.533019+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:14.681239
License: Public Domain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

    PHOEBE CLARK,1                             §
                                               §   No. 6, 2023
          Petitioner Below,                    §
          Appellant,                           §   Court Below—Family Court
                                               §   of the State of Delaware
          v.                                   §
                                               §   File No. CS17-02841
    BELLA COOK,                                §   Petition No. 22-24835
                                               §
          Respondent Below,                    §
          Appellee.                            §

                               Submitted: January 17, 2023
                                Decided: February 7, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

                                            ORDER

         After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to

the Court that:

         (1)    On January 6, 2023, the petitioner below-appellant, Phoebe Clark, filed

this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order, dated December 13, 2022,

denying her motion to rescind a protection from abuse order. The Senior Court Clerk

issued a notice directing Clark to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a

Family Court Commissioner’s order.

1
    The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
       (2)    In her response to the notice to show cause, Clark challenges the

issuance of the underlying protection from abuse order that was entered by default

in October 2019. She does not address this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain

an appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.

       (3)    Under 10 Del. C. § 915(d) and Family Court Civil Rules 53.1(a), a

party’s right to appeal from a Commissioner’s order is to a judge of the Family

Court.2 This Court lacks jurisdiction to lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal

directly from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.3 This appeal must therefore be

dismissed.

       NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

                                           BY THE COURT:

                                           /s/ Karen L. Valihura
                                           Justice

2
   10 Del. C. § 915(d)(1), (2) (governing appeals from final and interim orders issued by
commissioners); Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 53.1(a) (“An interim or final order of a commissioner may be
appealed to a judge of the [Family] Court....”).
3
  See, e.g., Wilson v. Div. of Child Support Servs./Ridgeway, 2021 WL 5028375, at *1 (Del. Oct.
28, 2021) (dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner’s order for lack of jurisdiction);
Wright v. DCSE, 2009 WL 1847743, at *1 (Del. June 29, 2009) (same).
                                              2