Court Opinion

ID: 2798192
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-05-02 05:01:56.487697+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:11:58.678755
License: Public Domain

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                      OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                              No. 14-410V
                                          Filed: April 8, 2015
                                         (Not to be published)

*************************
JOHN CIPRUS,                            *
                                        *
                    Petitioner,         *      Stipulation; Flu; Bell’s Palsy
      v.                                *
                                        *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *
                                        *
                    Respondent.         *
****************************
Edward M. Kraus, Esq., Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL for petitioner.
Lisa Watts, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

                               DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Gowen, Special Master:

       On May 13, 2014, John Ciprus (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner
alleged that as a result of receiving a flu vaccine on October 17, 2012, he suffered from
Bell’s Palsy. Stipulation ¶ 2, 4, filed Apr. 8, 2015. Further, petitioner alleged that he
experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Id. at ¶ 4.

        On April 8, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine
caused petitioner’s alleged Bell’s palsy, or any other injury, and further denies that
petitioner’s current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. Id. at ¶ 6.
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified
as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days
within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or
similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine
Rule 18(b).

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34
(2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to
42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

           (a) A lump sum of $200,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
               petitioner, John Ciprus. This amount represents compensation for
               all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

      The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the
terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                               s/ Thomas L. Gowen
                                               Thomas L. Gowen
                                               Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.