Court Opinion

ID: 1042025
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-09-25 17:52:26.233021+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:30.663570
License: Public Domain

Filed 9/24/13 Zirdung v. Tapia CA1/2
                      NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                       FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

                                                  DIVISION TWO

FRED ZIRDUNG,
         Plaintiff and Appellant,
                                                                     A138898
v.
JAKE ANTHONY TAPIA,                                                  (San Francisco City & County
                                                                     Super. Ct. No. CGC-12-525297)
         Defendant and Respondent.

                                                 BACKGROUND
         On October 9, 2012, plaintiff Fred Zirdung filed a complaint against defendant
Jake Tapia for damages allegedly arising out of an automobile versus scooter accident in
which the two parties were involved. Tapia did not timely respond, and on December 6,
2012, Zirdung filed a request for entry of his default. The clerk entered Tapia’s default
on December 10, 2012. No default judgment was entered.
         On February 28, 2013, Tapia filed a motion to set aside the default. On April 3,
2013, the court heard the motion, granting it and setting aside Tapia’s default. Tapia
answered the complaint that same day.
         On June 3, 2013, Zirdung filed a notice of appeal, confirming that he is appealing
from an “Order Setting Aside Default.” He cited no statutory authorization for the
appeal, as the form requested. On his civil case information statement, he represented
that he was appealing from “an order of judgment under Code. Civ. Proc.,
§ 904.1(a)(3)-(13).” He further represented that the judgment appealed from disposed of
all causes of action.

                                                             1
      On August 7, 2013, Tapia filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that no appeal lies
from an order granting a motion to set aside a default. Zirdung has not opposed the
motion.
                                     DISCUSSION
      As a general rule, an appeal may be taken from the final judgment entered in a
case. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(1).) Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1,
subdivisions (3) through (13) identify interlocutory orders from which appeal may also be
taken. An order granting a motion to set aside a default is not one of the enumerated
orders. Case law further confirms that such an order is nonappeable: “Established
California decisional law provides that no appeal lies from an order granting a motion to
vacate a default upon which no default judgment has been entered. (Leo v. Dunlap
(1968) 260 Cal.App.2d 24, 25; cf. Winter v. Rice (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 679, 682 [order
denying motion to vacate clerk’s entry of default].) Also, Code of Civil Procedure
section 904.1, which contains a lengthy list of appealable orders and judgments, does not
allow an appeal to be taken from an order granting a defendant’s default relief motion.”
(Veliscescu v. Pauna (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1521, 1522.)
      As confirmed by the foregoing, the order granting Tapia’s motion to set aside the
default is nonappealable.

                                            2
                                     DISPOSITION
       Tapia’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Zirdung’s appeal is dismissed.
Tapia shall recover his costs on appeal.

                                                _________________________
                                                Richman, J.

We concur:

_________________________
Kline, P.J.

_________________________
Brick, J.*

*
 Judge of the Alameda County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

                                            3