Court Opinion

ID: 1009278
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:53:36.226186+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:15:16.729810
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 02-7430

WAYMARE BILLUPS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; ERNEST SUTTON,

                                             Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-628-5-BO)

Submitted:   December 16, 2002         Decided:     December 20, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waymare Billups, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Waymare Billups appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).    We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.    See Billups v. Beck, No. CA-02-628-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 12, 2002).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                           AFFIRMED

                                  2