Court Opinion

ID: 5199353
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-06 15:49:06.446178+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:27:10.422391
License: Public Domain

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All. concurred, except P. and Nash, J., who dissented and voted for reversal on the ground that the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses that the locomotive was subjected to frequent and thorough inspection by competent inspectors is uncontradicted, and that there should have been a dismissal of the complaint upon this ground. (Smith v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 164 N. Y. 491 ; Biddiscomb v. Cameron, 35 App. Div. 561 ; affd., 161 N. Y. 637.)