Court Opinion

ID: 9372611
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-02-21 22:11:35.403252+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:16:36.546977
License: Public Domain

[Cite as State v. Rivkind, 2023-Ohio-514.]

                 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
                            ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
                                 PORTAGE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,                                    CASE NO. 2023-P-0004
CITY OF KENT,

                 Plaintiff-Appellee,              Criminal Appeal from the
                                                  Municipal Court, Kent Division
        - vs -

DANA BETH RIVKIND,                                Trial Court No. 2018 CRB 00215 K

                 Defendant-Appellant.

                                         MEMORANDUM
                                           OPINION

                                     Decided: February 21, 2023
                                     Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Hope L. Jones, The City of Kent, Ohio Law Director, 320 South Depeyster Street, Kent,
OH 44240 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Michael H. Shaut, Shaut Law, 20600 Chagrin Boulevard, Suite 470, Shaker Heights, OH
44122 (For Defendant-Appellant).

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.

        {¶1}     On January 24, 2023, appellant, Dana Beth Rivkind, through counsel, filed

a notice of appeal from the following Portage County Municipal Court, Kent Division,

entries: 1) a September 25, 2018 sentencing entry; 2) an April 26, 2022 entry denying

appellant’s motion to vacate; 3) an October 13, 2022 entry denying appellant’s motions

to withdraw her guilty plea, petition for post-conviction relief, and motion for

reconsideration; and 4) a December 29, 2022 entry denying appellant’s motion for

reconsideration.
       {¶2}   As to the December 29, 2022 entry, a trial court cannot reconsider a valid

final appealable order in a criminal case. State v. Cozzone, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2017-

G-0141, 2018-Ohio-2249, ¶34. See also State v. Clark, 3d Dist. Logan No. 8-18-10,

2018-Ohio-4168, ¶12. A motion for reconsideration of a trial court’s final judgment is a

nullity. Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 67 Ohio St.2d, 378, 379 (1981).

       {¶3}   The trial court’s September 25, 2018, April 26, 2022, and October 13, 2022

entries were all final orders which were not timely appealed. Thus, the appeal time in

App.R. 4(A) has run to appeal those entries.

       {¶4}   Further, because motions for reconsideration are a nullity, the December

29, 2022 entry denying appellant’s motion is not subject to appeal.

       {¶5}   Appeal dismissed.

JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.

                                            2

Case No. 2023-P-0004