Court Opinion

ID: 567564
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:13:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:12:03.496282
License: Public Domain

943 F.2d 58
NOTICE:  Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties.  See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Charles Chapman THAMER, II, Petitioner-Appellant,v.John NEIGHBORS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-4051.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Sept. 4, 1991.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
Before McKAY, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
EBEL, Circuit Judge.

1
After examining the briefs, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.   See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  10th Cir.R. 34.1.9.   Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.

2
There is no allegation that the defendant was required to proceed to trial in his prison uniform,1 and in the absence of any such allegation, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the District Court's Order of February 28, 1991, including the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate filed January 31, 1991.

*
 This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.   10th Cir.R. 36.3

1
 As best as can be determined from the record, his complaint is that he was required to appear in prison garb at the preliminary hearing