Court Opinion

ID: 652941
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-16 06:31:17+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:59:50.436201
License: Public Domain

5 F.3d 177
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Paul KAPLANSKY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-3744.
United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 29, 1993.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge;  and KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc.  Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.