Court Opinion

ID: 4941873
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-24 09:15:55.386285+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:14:56.147775
License: Public Domain

IN THE
                                   TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

                                            No. 10-20-00269-CV

                           IN THE INTEREST OF KRH-B, A CHILD

                                     From the 220th District Court
                                       Hamilton County, Texas
                                       Trial Court No. FM06819

                                      ABATEMENT ORDER

           The reporter’s record in this proceeding has not been filed.

           The Court had enlisted the aid of the trial court 1 as required by the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure to secure the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). We informed the

trial court that we believed a court reporter was not present to take reporter's notes but

that an audio recording was made of the hearing which resulted in the order establishing

a parent-child relationship being appealed. We asked the trial court to use whatever

resources the court had at its disposal to cause a transcription of the audio recording to

be made in a timely manner and filed with the Tenth Court of Appeals.

1
    All references to the trial court are to the Title IV-D associate trial court judge.
        In response, the trial court advised this Court that “[t]he audio recording of the

August 20, 2019, hearing is available,” but that it had neither the resources nor ability to

transcribe it. The trial court asked to be advised “as to the preferred method to get the

recording [to this Court].”

        The rules of appellate procedure provide for both stenographic and electronic

recording of court proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(a)(1), (2). But when an electronic

recording is made as it was in this proceeding, certain other procedures must be followed

to ensure an appellate record can be presented to the Court of Appeals. For example,

        If the proceedings were electronically recorded, the reporter's record
        consists of certified copies of all tapes or other audio-storage devices on
        which the proceedings were recorded, any of the exhibits that the parties to
        the appeal designate, and certified copies of the logs prepared by the court
        recorder under Rule 13.2.

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(a)(2). However, the appellate court is not required to review any part

of the electronic recording. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.5(b). Rule 13 provides for additional

duties for the court recorder, such as:

        (a) ensure that the recording system functions properly throughout the
            proceeding and that a complete, clear, and transcribable recording is
            made;

        (b) make a detailed, legible log of all proceedings being recorded, showing:

                (1) the number and style of the case before the court;
                (2) the name of each person speaking;
                (3) the event being recorded such as the voir dire, the opening
                statement, direct and cross-examinations, and bench conferences;
                (4) each exhibit offered, admitted, or excluded;
                (5) the time of day of each event; and
                (6) the index number on the recording device showing where each
                event is recorded;

In the Interest of KRH-B                                                               Page 2
        (c) after a proceeding ends, file with the clerk the original log;

        (d) have the original recording stored to ensure that it is preserved and is
            accessible; and

        (e) ensure that no one gains access to the original recording without the
            court's written order.

TEX. R. APP. P. 13.2. If a party to the proceeding is indigent, as appellant is in this appeal,

Rule 38.5(d) requires the court recorder, in this case, the trial court, to “transcribe or have

transcribed those portions of the recording that the party designates and must file the

transcription as that party's appendix, along with all exhibits.” TEX. R. APP. P. 38.5(d).

        The inability of this Court to obtain a proper record might require a summary

reversal and retrial of any judgment or order which relies upon the events that transpired

at this hearing and any subsequent ruling or judgment that resulted from that hearing or

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

        Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED so that the trial court has the jurisdiction to

conduct any hearings or issue any orders necessary so that it may comply with the above-

mentioned rules and, within 45 days from the date of this ORDER,:

        1. prepare and file with this Court certified copies of all tapes or other

            audio-storage devices on which the proceedings were recorded;

        2. prepare and file with this Court any of the exhibits that the parties to the

            appeal designate;

        3. prepare and file with this Court certified copies of the logs required

            under Rule 13.2; and

In the Interest of KRH-B                                                                  Page 3
        4. transcribe, or have transcribed, and file with this Court the recorded

            proceeding as the appellant’s appendix.

                                         PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,
       Justice Johnson, and
       Justice Smith
Appeal abated
Order issued and filed September 21, 2021
[RWR]

In the Interest of KRH-B                                                            Page 4