Court Opinion

ID: 9681120
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-24 07:44:13.663624+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:19.277253
License: Public Domain

MILLER, J.,
concurs with the following note:
To reiterate, with emphasis, what we said in Ex parte Crispin, 777 S.W.2d 103 (Tex.Cr.App., 1989) (Plurality Opinion):
“The scholarly remarks of our brother Clinton, in his concurring opinion, concerning the criteria of cognizability of habeas corpus claims in state courts will doubtless be revisited when the issue is squarely before the court.”
At 105. Because the issue is not before us at this time, I join the majority opinion.
TEAGUE, J., dissents.