Court Opinion

ID: 1004285
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:38:53.903851+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:09:42.441317
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 00-7720

STEPHAN D. BROOKS,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

R. G. BRUENING; JACK KNIGHT; CITY COUNTY GOV-
ERNMENT OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-10-3-MU2)

Submitted:   April 27, 2001                   Decided:   May 3, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephan D. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Stephan D. Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.   We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court.    See Brooks v. Buening, No. CA-00-10-3-MU2

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2000).   We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                          AFFIRMED

                                 2