Court Opinion

ID: 9889590
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-10-10 19:01:28.194363+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:58.731916
License: Public Domain

USCA11 Case: 22-10721    Document: 44-1     Date Filed: 10/10/2023   Page: 1 of 2

                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 22-10721
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       RICHARD BRIAN SOSEBEE,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Georgia
                    D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00039-MLB-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10721      Document: 44-1     Date Filed: 10/10/2023     Page: 2 of 2

       2                      Opinion of the Court                 22-10721

       Before WILSON, LUCK, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
              Christopher Twyman, appointed counsel for Richard Sose-
       bee in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur-
       ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
       Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
       of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
       merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
       of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
       motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sosebee’s convictions and
       sentences are AFFIRMED.