Court Opinion

ID: 5571579
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-11 01:13:33.650915+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:35:46.425156
License: Public Domain

Fish, J.
The bill of exceptions in the present case presents hut a single question, viz., whether a solicitor-general having in his hands at the spring term of a superior court, after paying all insolvent costs due to himself and the other officers of court, a balance of a fund arising from fines and forfeitures, is required to pay such balance into the treasury of the county, or may retain it in his hands until the following fall term. The judge of the court below held the former of the two alternatives to be the law, and, in our opinion, erredin so deciding. ThePenal Code, § 798, enumerates the *196special duties of solicitors-general, and in paragraph 7 provides that-they shall collect all moneys arising from fines and forfeited recognizances, etc., and at the fall term of each court, every year, shall settle with the county treasurer and pay over to him all money s-due him, according to law, after a fair and full settlement. Nowhere else does the law prescribe the time when the solicitor must make a settlement, and it would therefore seem that this section definitely expresses the legislative intent upon the subject. Of course a solicitor-general may, if he sees fit, settle with the treasurer at-each term of court; but if, on the other hand, he should choose to-retain in his hands until the fall term each year the moneys collected by him by virtue of his office, there is no legal way to compel him to do otherwise.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little- and Lewis, JJ., absent.