Court Opinion

ID: 9789605
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-31 01:39:05.603097+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:37:23.477491
License: Public Domain

DOOLIN, Justice,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I concur with that portion of the majority opinion which holds federal legislation has pre-empted appellant’s rights, requiring him to bring claims of anti-trust violations of interstate character in federal court. I dissent to that portion of opinion which does not allow appellant to amend his petition to comport with an action brought under state law, 79 O.S. 1971 § 1 et seq. Federal pre-emption of the field is not total. *1152The possibility of an action under state law is still present. Appellant was denied the opportunity to amend in order to plead such an action.
I am authorized to state that Chief Justice HODGES and Justice BARNES concur with the views expressed herein.