Court Opinion

ID: 9576862
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:29:26.394144+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:19:39.784416
License: Public Domain

Calhoun, Judge,
concurring:
• While I éarnestly but respectfully challenge the soundness of the decision embodied in the Court’s opinion in this case, .1 concur merely because I feel such decision is controlled by State ex rel. Vandal v. Adams, 145 W. Va. 566, 115 S. E. 2d 489, though I am of the opinion that the decision in that case was totally lacking in precedent for its justification. The reasons for my disagreement were stated in my dissenting opinion in the Vandal case, and my subsequent .concurring opinion in State ex rel. Reed v. Boles, 148 W. Va. 770, 137 S. E. 2d 246.