Court Opinion

ID: 3607656
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:52:42.095079+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:15:34.806835
License: Public Domain

Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants' motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American TobaccoCo., 296 N.Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach  Moore, Inc.,239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action, nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.
The order should be affirmed, with costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.
LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur; CONWAY, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed, etc.