Court Opinion

ID: 9534864
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 04:43:14.561879+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:32:50.064971
License: Public Domain

CAVANAUGH, Judge,
concurring:
I join in the majority decision, but write to express my disagreement with the per curiam order of this court which *36quashed the cross-appeals of Troyer and Deere. These parties are asserting cross-appeals, not appeals, and could be duly aggrieved in the event a new trial is awarded by this or any other court with appropriate jurisdiction.
Moreover, the timeliness of the cross-appeals has not been raised by the parties and the extent to which the cross-appeals may be said to have been untimely was based upon a conjectural analysis which was not subjected to an opportunity for adversarial consideration by the parties to this case.