Court Opinion

ID: 9743300
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 21:30:31.007811+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:24:40.461158
License: Public Domain

*453Sievers, Judge,
concurring.
While I believe that the majority opinion completely sets forth the applicable law and reaches the right result, I wish to make it clear that I hold to my view expressed in my concurrence in State v. Ybarra, 9 Neb. App. 230, 609 N.W.2d 696 (2000), that price tags prove “retail value” which is sufficient proof of value in a theft case. But, a specific amount need not be proved here, and thus the evidence is sufficient.
Irwin, Chief Judge, joins in this concurrence.