Court Opinion

ID: 6337325
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-05-03 15:02:00.888199+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:25:06.785741
License: Public Domain

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
 UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
                 AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

                                    IN THE
             ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
                                DIVISION ONE

                     STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

                                        v.

                 JON ANTHONY SCHWEDER, Petitioner.

                         No. 1 CA-CR 22-0054 PRPC
                              FILED 5-3-2022

     Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Navajo County
                         No. S0900CR20090633
                 The Honorable Melinda K. Hardy, Judge

                  REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

                                   COUNSEL

Navajo County Attorney’s Office, Holbrook
By Michael R. Shumway
Counsel for Respondent

Jon Anthony Schweder, Florence
Petitioner
                            STATE v. SCHWEDER
                             Decision of the Court

                       MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge
Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1             Petitioner Jon Anthony Schweder seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is
petitioner’s first petition.

¶2             Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to
show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition
for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011)
(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3            We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.

¶4            We grant review and deny relief.

                           AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
                           FILED: AA

                                          2