Court Opinion

ID: 547096
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:07:02+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:11:51.095815
License: Public Domain

912 F.2d 463Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Richard Steven MAULICK, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Larry W. HUFFMAN, Warden, Mary Sue Terry, Attorney Generalof Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6804.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 17, 1990.Decided Aug. 31, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge.  (CA-88-442-R)
Richard Steven Maulick, appellant pro se.
Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Richard Steven Maulick seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.  Maulick v. Huffman, CA-88-442-R (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2
DISMISSED.