Court Opinion

ID: 5757149
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-12 17:08:19.349068+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:41:26.877993
License: Public Domain

-Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and determination of Zoning Board of Appeals of Rochester annulled. Memorandum: Petitioners appeal from Special Term’s order confirming a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals granting intervenors a variance for construction of a commercial building in an area zoned residential. Intervenor Amico purchased the property in 1960, boarded it up and never occupied it. The issue involved here is the intervenors’ claim of hardship. There is completely absent from this record any proof that the premises in question could not yield a reasonable return if used in conformity with the existing zoning regulations, or that the intervenors’ problem is due to unique circumstances, and that the proposed use for which the variance is sought would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood (Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N. Y. 71, 76; Matter of Gerling v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 6 A D 2d 247, 251). Upon the proof presented at the hearing the action of the Zoning Board of Appeals was arbitrary and capricious and it was error for Special Term to have confirmed that determination. (Appeal from'order of Monroe Special Term confirming determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Rochester and dismissing the petition on the merits.)
Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, J-J.