Court Opinion

ID: 626607
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-04-03 19:40:33+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:27:20.699208
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 11-7625

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

DARYL ANDRE FULLER,

                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.   Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1)

Submitted:   March 29, 2012                 Decided:   April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl Andre Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.    Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Daryl Andre Fuller appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).     We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.         United States v. Fuller, No. 7:98-cr-

00076-HMH-1   (D.S.C.   Nov.    16,   2011).   We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                AFFIRMED

                                      2