Court Opinion

ID: 8156481
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-09-09 20:42:27.713354+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:39:36.878869
License: Public Domain

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, *550340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.
Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.