Court Opinion

ID: 9407068
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-07-05 19:09:21.564341+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:20:35.063980
License: Public Domain

STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE       OF   LOUISIANA                                                               NO.   2023        KW    0380

VERSUS

JAMES       EARL                                                                            JULY         5,     2023

In    Re:          James       Earl,      applying   for   supervisory writs,   22nd
                   Judicial          District Court,  Parish of Washington, No.  11-
                   CR4- 112566.

BEFORE:            LANIER,         HESTER,       AND    MILLER,       JJ.

        WRIT       DENIED      ON     THE      SHOWING        MADE.       Relator        failed          to     include
a     file -stamped            copy         of     the        application             for      postconviction

relief,          the     applicable              district          court'     s     ruling,          the        State' s
response,          if any,         the     bill    of    information,              the    commitment             order,
pertinent          district          court       minutes,          and    any      other       portion          of    the
district         court        record       that        might       support         the    claims          raised        in
the     writ       application.             Therefore,             this       court      cannot          adequately
review the ruling at                     issue herein.              Supplementation                 of    this writ
application             and/ or       an       application          for       rehearing          will           not     be
considered.              See       Uniform        Rules       of    Louisiana            Courts          of     Appeal,
Rules       2- 18. 7 &     4- 9.          In     the    event      relator         elects       to       file     a   new

application            with    this        court,       he may do so without                    the        necessity
of obtaining  a                return          date.     Any future filing                     on     this        issue
should include                 the       entire        contents          of       this    application,                the
missing items noted above,                        and a copy of this ruling.

                                                        WIL
                                                        CHH
                                                        SMM

OURT        OF APPEAL,         FIRST       CIRCUIT

                               k

              UTY      CLERK OF       COURT
                 FOR     THE    COURT