Court Opinion

ID: 9815752
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-09-01 02:23:44.271048+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:03:27.336553
License: Public Domain

Kline, J.,
dissenting in part.
{¶ 14} I respectfully dissent as to the fourth assignment of error.
{¶ 15} The majority finds this alleged error moot. However, I disagree because if the state failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove an element of the offense, then double jeopardy would prevent a retrial.
{¶ 16} Therefore, I would address the alleged error and find Beebe’s argument lacks merit. Consequently, I would overrule Beebe’s fourth assignment of error.
{¶ 17} Thus, I dissent in part.