Court Opinion

ID: 2963563
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:12:06.055099+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:10:20.591495
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          July 21, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1625

                                    UNITED STATES,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                               REX W. CUNNINGHAM, JR.,

                                Defendant, Appellant.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                 [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            Barbara J. Sweeney and Jack F. St. Clair on brief for appellant.
            __________________     _________________
            Donald K.  Stern, United States  Attorney, and  Todd E.  Newhouse,
            ________________                                _________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per  Curiam.    This  is an appeal from a pre-trial
                      ___________

            detention order.   We  have independently reviewed  the facts

            and the record, while giving deference to the findings of the

            magistrate  judge and  district court.  See United  States v.
                                                    ___ ______________

            O'Brien,  895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir. 1990).  For essentially
            _______

            the reasons  stated in the magistrate  judge's Memorandum and

            Order, dated May 10, 1995, we affirm the detention order.

                 Affirmed.
                 ________