Court Opinion

ID: 6836596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-07-23 20:06:39.893356+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T16:04:43.384292
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
An application for rehearing calls attention to some errors in fact-recitals of the opinion; these errors should be corrected.
Mrs. Dowling’s residence was in the nearest town, some three miles from the distillery. The defendants’ motion for a new trial because of the reporter’s death was overruled, upon the ground that the writ of error had issued, and the trial court had lost jurisdiction to grant a new trial. The offer of the trial judge to prepare and submit a bill of exceptions was made by him in connection with the denial of defendants’ later motion to certify to this court the fact of the loss of the stenographer’s notes as a substitute for an ordinary bill of exceptions. These corrections do not change the substance of things nor affect the result. The jurisdiction Of the District Court to settle a bill of exceptions continued, .in spite of the writ of error, until after the time at which the specified offer by the judge was made.
Defendants are perhaps right in saying that their motion for a new trial on this ground should be heard and decided on its merits in one court or the other, and we see no obstacle to entertaining it, as they have now presented it, as a motion in this court which we may hear as reasonably aneilliary to our appellate jurisdiction invoked by the writ of error. The motion being thus before us, we deny it, for the reasons stated in our opinion.
The rehearing application is denied.