Court Opinion

ID: 8824019
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-11-26 15:41:52.205422+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:04:43.479698
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
On a verdict finding the plaintiff in error (herein referred to as the defendant) guilty on counts 3 and 5 of the indictment the court sentenced him to pay a fine of $100 and all costs, and to be confined in the Hinds county jail at Jackson, Miss., for the period of 90 days from the date of the sentence. The third count charged that the defendant, at a time and place stated, “did knowingly and unlawfully possess intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided.” The fifth count charged that, at a time and place stated, the defendant “did knowingly, unlawfully, and feloniously have and possess property designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors intended for use in violation of the National Prohibition Act, to wit, an apparatus for distilling intoxicating liquors, contrary to the form of the statute,” etc.
The assignments of error are based upon the action of the court in overruling a motion to exclude all the evidence offered in behalf of the government, and in refusing a requested, instruction to the jury to find for the defendant. We are of opinion that the direct and circumstantial evidence adduced supported a verdict of guilty on the two counts mentioned, and that there was no error in the rulings complained of. The record does not indicate that, prior to the commission of the offenses of which the defendant was found guilty, he had been guilty of either of those offenses. On his first conviction of those offenses, he was not subject to be punished by imprisonment. National Prohibition Act, §§ 25, 29, 41 Stat. 305.
*178The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The sentence imposed is vacated, and.the cause is remanded, to the end that the defendant be sentenced as authorized by law.