Court Opinion

ID: 2172290
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 08:31:37.674189+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:26:07.324962
License: Public Domain

292 S.W.3d 590 (2009)
Michael D. VEHLEWALD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91899.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
September 15, 2009.
*591 Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Christopher Koster, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Vehlewald appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).