Court Opinion

ID: 2863957
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-05 23:55:31.770681+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T11:34:45.608850
License: Public Domain

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00727-CR

Peter Torres, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-00-035, HONORABLE DON B. MORGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Peter Louis Torres pleaded guilty to engaging in organized criminal
activity.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 71.02(a)(1) (West Supp 2001).  The district court adjudged
appellant guilty and assessed punishment at incarceration in a state jail for two years and a $1000
fine.  There was no plea bargain.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised
of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

				                                                                                   

				Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed:   June 14, 2001

Do Not Publish