Court Opinion

ID: 5284629
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2022-01-07 04:25:30.193407+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:28:33.176132
License: Public Domain

ORDER
PER CURIAM
Terrell Johnson (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because the court accepted his guilty pleas, found him to be a persistent drug offender, and sentenced him without having an information or indictment in its file.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).