Court Opinion

ID: 4886948
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2021-09-02 23:44:31.685219+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:05:52.897384
License: Public Domain

After stating the facts,
Mr. Justice "Wheeler
delivered the opinion of the court.
Many of the grounds embraced in the motion in arrest have no relevancy to anything which appears in the record. Those which have relate only to the indictment and judgment, and in our opinion are not well taken.
No prescribed form of words is necessary in order that the prosecution be “ carried on in the name and by the authority of the republic of Texas.” It is enough that the prosecution is conducted by the proper law officer, acting under the authority and conducting the prosecution in the name of the government. Nor is it necessary to state in terms in the indictment that the offense was committed within the jurisdiction of the district court. The jurisdiction of that court is general, and if the offense is charged to have been committed in the proper county, that is a sufficient averment that it is within the jurisdiction of the court. Though in an indictment for a statutory offense the statute must be strictly pursued, yet it is not necessary to employ the exact words of the statute, unless the words used are the technical words which constitute the specific offense. “ It is not, in general, necessary in an indictment for a statutable offense to follow the exact *158wording of a statute; it is sufficient if tbe offense be set forth with substantial accuracy and certainty to a reasonable intendment.” United States v. Bachelder, 2 Gall. 15.
Many "of the objections urged seem mere assumptions of fact, either wholly unsupported or disproved by the record, and do not seem to require more particular notice.
The indictment pursues the statute strictly, and is deemed to possess the requisite certainty and legal sufficiency in every respect. And the judgment, though informal, is believed to be sufficiently certain, and to afford a legal foundation on which to rest the execution of the sentence of the law.
It is incumbent on the party seeking to reverse a judgment to bring up the case in such a manner as to present the particular points decided, of which he complains, in order that if error exist it may be seen and corrected. And if he fails to do so, he must suffer the consequences of his own IdcJlGS,
We are of opinion that the judgment be affirmed and the case remanded for further proceedings.