Court Opinion

ID: 2963236
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:07:49.160442+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:19:02.566185
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT                                 ____________________        No. 94-2030                                     UNITED STATES,                                      Appellee,                                          v.                               RADAMES CABRERA MEDINA,                                Defendant, Appellant.                                 ____________________                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO                   [Hon. Gilberto Gierbolini, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________                                 ____________________                                        Before                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________                           Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
                                            ______________                                 ____________________            Maria H. Sandoval on brief for appellant.
            _________________            Guillermo Gil, United  States Attorney, Warren Vazquez,  Assistant
            _____________                           ______________        United States Attorney, and Jos  A. Quiles-Espinosa, Senior Litigation
                                    _______________________        Counsel, on brief for appellee.                                 ____________________                                    April 14, 1995                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.   We reject  appellant's arguments  and
                      __________            affirm  the judgment below  for the reasons  stated in United
                                                                   ______            States v. Rodriguez, 26  F.3d 4, 7-8 (1st Cir.  1994); United
            ______    _________                                    ______            States v. Troncoso, 23  F.3d 612, 615 (1st Cir.  1994), cert.
            ______    ________                                      _____            denied, 115  S.Ct. 912  (1995); and  United States  v. Perez-
            ______                               _____________     ______            Torres,  15 F.3d 403, 407 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct.
            ______                                ____________            125 (1994).                      Affirmed.
                      ________                                         -2-