Court Opinion

ID: 1789547
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-10-30 07:27:01.776073+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:39:22.044769
License: Public Domain

294 S.W.3d 138 (2009)
Willie HAMILTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92163.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
October 13, 2009.
Alexandra Johnson, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Prior report: 227 S.W.3d 529.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Willie Hamilton appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15[1] motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Hamilton argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. We find the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
NOTES
[1]  All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2009).