Court Opinion

ID: 52101
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2010-04-26 01:12:09+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:44:13.825707
License: Public Domain

United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit
                                                                           F I L E D
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                              August 21, 2007
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                Clerk
                                  No. 07-10260
                               Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

NATHANIEL JEREMY SALAZAR

                                              Defendant-Appellant

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 6:06-CR-27-8

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
      The attorney appointed to represent Nathaniel Jeremy Salazar has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salazar has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Salazar’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

      *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.