Court Opinion

ID: 3105409
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-10-16 05:46:33.768241+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:55:02.090989
License: Public Domain

NUMBER 13-10-00652-CV

                            COURT OF APPEALS

                  THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                     CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

BERNARDO LOZANO, ET AL.,                                                    Appellants,

                                           v.

TRANSIT MIX CONCRETE & MATERIALS COMPANY,            Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

              On Appeal from the 107th District Court
                   of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION
     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

      This cause is before the Court on appellee’s motions to dismiss the appeal.

Appellants, Bernardo Lozano, et. al., filed a notice of appeal from a judgment entered by

the 107th District Court of Cameron County in cause number 2007-05-2660-A.            On

March 14, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's record in the

above cause was originally due on December 28, 2010, and that the deputy district clerk,
Monica Uribe, had notified this Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for

payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants of this defect so

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3, 42.3(b),(c).   Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within

ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

       Appellants have failed to respond to this Court=s notice.        The Court hereby

GRANTS appellee’s motions to dismiss. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

                                                 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
19th day of May, 2011.

                                             2