Court Opinion

ID: 1007587
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:27:38.078172+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:10.541999
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Oran T. Davis and Regina Davis appeal the district court’s order granting three separate motions to dismiss filed by the Defendants and dismissing their civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac
   
   *948
   
  eordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Davis v. Meredith,
  
  No. CA-01-452-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2001; entered Dec. 19, 2001). We deny as moot the Davises’ motion to remand the case, or in the alternative, to place the case in abeyance pending disposition of their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.