Court Opinion

ID: 1008389
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:39:33.078266+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:13:06.084196
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                               No. 02-6587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus

JAMES PAIGE, a/k/a Ness,

                                                Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-90-236, CA-01-1255-A)

Submitted:   August 15, 2002                 Decided:   August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Paige, Appellant Pro Se.    Michael R. Smythers, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     James Paige seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).   We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error.   Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.     See

United States v. Paige, Nos. CR-90-236; CA-01-1255-A (E.D. Va. Feb.

11, 2002).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                         DISMISSED

                                 2