Court Opinion

ID: 9920580
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-01-18 23:43:32.923256+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:24:30.395205
License: Public Domain

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered February 16, 2001, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the conviction is unpreserved for appel*378late review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.