Court Opinion

ID: 3662007
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-06 06:13:14.692148+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:39:17.396868
License: Public Domain

This is an appeal from the order of the court      (286) below, dissolving the restraining order. The order is as follows: "It is ordered by the court, without finding facts, but as a matter of law, that the restraining order be dissolved, at the cost of the plaintiff, to be taxed by the clerk." The action was brought by the holder of a tax deed, who had also bought at a sale under a deed of trust, in which he was cestuique trust. He appears to be in possession, and brings this action to "quiet his title to the land and determine the adverse claims of the defendants." "Wherefore, he asks that defendant be restrained from selling under the deed of trust, and for such other relief as the plaintiff is entitled to in the premises." It is thus seen that a perpetual injunction is the principal relief sought, and in fact the only relief specifically asked.
A sale of real property nearly always threatens irreparable damage, and especially a forced sale, for cash, at public auction. Material issues *Page 228 
are raised in the pleading, and as no facts have been found, either by the court or a jury, we are of opinion that the injunction should be continued to the final hearing. Capehart v. Biggs, 77 N.C. 261; Purnell v. Vaughan,ib., 268; Lowe v. Comrs., 70 N.C. 532; Bridgers v. Morris, 90 N.C. 32;Heilig v. Stokes, 63 N.C. 612; Jarman v. Saunders, 64 N.C. 367; Howesv. Mauney, 67 N.C. 218; Dockery v. French, 69 N.C. 308; Harrison v.Bray, 92 N.C. 488; Durham v. R. R., 104 N.C. 261; Clark's Code, sec. 333, p. 393 et seq. The action appears to have been brought in good faith, to determine substantial matters of difference, and yet "in despite of the action now pending, the defendants seek to cut the `gordian knot' by a sale of the land under the power in the mortgage deed. This cannot be allowed." The injunction should be continued to the hearing, and the judgment of the court below is
Reversed.
Cited: Puryear v. Sanford, 124 N.C. 282; Smith v. Parker, 131 N.C. 472;Marion v. Bank, 133 N.C. 785; Zeiger v. Stephenson, 153 N.C. 530.
(287)