Court Opinion

ID: 1008504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 19:41:14.623077+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:14:41.085422
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Stuart Hill and Vicki Hill appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders finding that the claim of the Maryland Consumer Protection Division is nondischargeable and dismissing the Hills’ counterclaims. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   In re: Hill,
  
  No. CA-01-692-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.