Court Opinion

ID: 4467204
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-12-23 22:00:30.41575+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:04:28.600101
License: Public Domain

Case: 18-12490    Date Filed: 12/23/2019   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-12490
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20082-RNS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

OBERTO JEAN,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 23, 2019)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-12490    Date Filed: 12/23/2019   Page: 2 of 2

      Michelle P. Smith, appointed counsel for Oberto Jean in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Jean’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

                                         2