Court Opinion

ID: 1004596
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:43:27.284182+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:35:33.962734
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  Natalya Tamara Hampel and Joseph Hampel appeal the district court’s order summarily dismissing their complaint alleging that defendants acted under color of federal law to deprive the Hampels of their constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   Hampel v. United States,
  
  No. CA-01-124-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.