Court Opinion

ID: 1003882
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-04 18:33:08.358083+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:30:21.222653
License: Public Domain

PER CURIAM.
 

  James A. Pauling appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
  
   See Pauling v. South Carolina,
  
  No. CA-00-2412-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   DISMISSED.