Court Opinion

ID: 988920
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2013-07-03 22:59:29.558426+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:34:39.080642
License: Public Domain

UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

                              No. 95-2872

LUTHER RUTHER,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

         versus

STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief
District Judge. (CA-95-1165-A)

Submitted:   March 21, 1996                 Decided:   April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Ruther v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. CA-95-1165-A (E.D.
Va. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

                                                        AFFIRMED

                                2