Court Opinion

ID: 3557342
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:08:06.430331+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:00.050269
License: Public Domain

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Where a co-maker places his signature upon a note at a place other than the place where a small loan business is being conducted that circumstance does not void the instrument under chapter 62 of Pamph. L. 1932. N.J.Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, § 35-22.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 253