Court Opinion

ID: 2653176
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2014-02-13 01:02:37.724948+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:28:48.399405
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

                                       Docket No. 41016

STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )      2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 372
                                                 )
       Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )      Filed: February 12, 2014
                                                 )
v.                                               )      Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                 )
TERRY JO NORRIS,                                 )      THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                 )      OPINION AND SHALL NOT
       Defendant-Appellant.                      )      BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                 )

       Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
       Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler, District Judge.

       Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of thirty years, with a minimum
       period of confinement of seven years, for robbery, affirmed.

       Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy
       Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

       Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
       General, Boise, for respondent.
                 ________________________________________________

                         Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
                                  and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
       Terry Jo Norris pled guilty to robbery.       Idaho Code § 18-6501.     The district court
sentenced Norris to a unified term of thirty years, with a minimum period of confinement of
seven years. Norris appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an
excessive sentence.
       Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

                                                1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
       Therefore, Norris’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

                                                   2