Court Opinion

ID: 9779550
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-29 23:08:29.976075+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:33:32.581887
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10212         Document: 00516877024             Page: 1      Date Filed: 08/29/2023

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10212
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                                August 29, 2023
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Luis Humberto Rodriguez,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                               USDC No. 3:19-CR-652-1
                      ______________________________

   Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Humberto
   Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
   with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
   F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. We have reviewed
   counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as

          _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10212    Document: 00516877024          Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/29/2023

                                  No. 23-10212

   well as Rodriguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
   appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
   counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
   from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
   5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                       2