Court Opinion

ID: 4437324
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-09-11 19:07:14.811447+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:00:15.669222
License: Public Domain

People v Nikac (2019 NY Slip Op 06514)

People v Nikac

2019 NY Slip Op 06514

Decided on September 11, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 11, 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-07071	
 (Ind. No. 279N/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
vDijela Nikac, appellant.

Stacy Eves, Rockville Centre, NY, for appellant.
Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Kevin C. King and John B. Latella of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Helene F. Gugerty, J.), rendered June 9, 2017, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the motion of Stacy Eves for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and she is directed to turn over all papers in her possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,
ORDERED that Patrick Megaro, 626 RXR Plaza, 6th Floor, West Tower, Uniondale, New York, 11556, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 16, 2018, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file one original and five duplicate hard copies, and one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[a][4]; [c][1]).
An attorney's motion to be relieved pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), should be accompanied by a brief " reciting the underlying facts and highlighting anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal'" (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 256, quoting People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833, 833). As this Court has explained, "counsel must, at a minimum, draw the Court's attention to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, applications, or motions; and [*2]identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 258).
Here, the brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v California was deficient because it merely discussed three issues the defendant sought to raise without any reference to relevant legal authority, and failed to independently analyze whether any potential appellate issues arose from the pretrial, plea, or sentencing proceedings or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v Randolph, 156 AD3d 818; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 256; People v Barger, 72 AD3d 696, 697; People v Henry, 143 AD2d 277, 278). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled her obligations under Anders v California, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v Sedita, 113 AD3d 638, 640; People v McNair, 110 AD3d 742, 743; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 258).
CHAMBERS, J.P., LASALLE, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court