Court Opinion

ID: 3174675
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-02-05 09:13:31.426424+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T09:20:04.286356
License: Public Domain

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                         OF TEXAS
                                         NO. WR-84,446-01

                       EX PARTE DAVID EARL HICKMAN, Applicant

                  ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
                   CAUSE NO. 25472 IN THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT
                              FROM HUNT COUNTY

        Per curiam.

                                              ORDER

        Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

        Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because counsel did not advise applicant

that a conviction required non-accomplice witness testimony when there was none. Applicant has

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are

needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial

court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond
                                                                                                      2

to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out

in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its

personal recollection. Id.

       If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

        The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. Should the trial court find that counsel erred in advising

Applicant, it shall make specific findings addressing whether, but for counsel’s errors, Applicant

would have insisted on a trial. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

       This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 3, 2016
Do not publish