Court Opinion

ID: 9709443
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-26 03:47:58.891009+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T18:22:48.952656
License: Public Domain

GARRARD, Judge,
concurring in result.
I coneur with parts II and III of the majority opinion. I disagree with majority analysis in part I and footnote 4. The defendant made no objection to the questions asked by the prosecutor about Officer House's background. When defense counsel finally interposed an objection, there was no question pending before the witness. Thus, no potential error was preserved for appeal, and that is the end of it. Indeed, it seems likely to me that counsel interposed the objection simply to raise the flag and deter the state from pursuing the subject any further. In this he succeeded.
Accordingly, reached. I coneur in the result