Court Opinion

ID: 542588
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:05:47+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:16.142566
License: Public Domain

904 F.2d 700Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.Herbert Clyde LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,andJames S. Snowden, Jr.;  Winston N. Disney;  William Lee;Timothy T. Costley;  James Brightful;  TrennardFinney;  Robert Harbaugh, Plaintiffs,v.John ARMCOST, Commissioner;  Jeff Griffith, Commissioner;Julia Gouge, Commissioner;  Grover N. Sensabaugh, Sheriff;John W. Stultz, Warden;  William Thomas, Assistant Warden;Alva Baker, Doctor;  Debbie Sherffey, CPL;  John Lilly,Private, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7775.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  May 7, 1990.Decided:  May 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge.  (C/A No. 87-1724-PN).
Herbert Clyde Lynch, appellant pro se.
Paul T. Cuzmanes, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

1
Herbert Clyde Lynch appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  Lynch v. Armcost, CA-89-1724-PN (D.Md. Aug. 9, 1989).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED