Court Opinion

ID: 2923988
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-11 03:54:43.586326+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:56:26.175436
License: Public Domain

NUMBER13-06-597-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________  ___ 

GUILLERMO VEGA, JR.,	Appellant,

v.

SUSANNA VEGA,	Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________ 

On appeal from the 93rd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
_________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

	Appellant, GUILLERMO VEGA, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered
by the   93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4678-98-B. 
The clerk's record was filed on November 21, 2006.  No reporter's record was filed.
Appellant's brief was due on December 21, 2006.  To date, no appellate brief has
been received.
	When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court
may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably
explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure
to timely file a brief.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
	On April 27, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject
to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  Appellant was given ten days to
explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief.  To date, no
response has been received.
	The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file,
appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's
failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of
prosecution.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

									PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 28th day of June, 2007.