Court Opinion

ID: 3558018
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2016-07-05 23:08:49.937742+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:49:00.174631
License: Public Domain

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 15.
 For reversal — None. *Page 222