Court Opinion

ID: 2963799
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2015-09-21 21:15:18.886798+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:02:00.788987
License: Public Domain

USCA1 Opinion

	

          November 14, 1995
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                           
                                 ____________________

        No. 95-1380 

                                  JAMES McLAUGHLIN,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                     UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
                                          ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            James McLaughlin on brief pro se.
            ________________
            Jay  P.  McCloskey,  United  States  Attorney,  Frank  W.  Hunger,
            __________________                              _________________
        Assistant Attorney General,  Marleigh D. Dover and Jennifer Hay Zacks,
                                     _________________     __________________
        Attorneys, Appellate Staff, Civil  Division, Department of Justice, on
        brief for appellees.

                                 ____________________

                                 ____________________

                      Per Curiam.  We  have carefully reviewed the record
                      __________

            and  the  briefs of  the  parties  and  summarily affirm  the

            judgment of  the district  court for essentially  the reasons

            stated in  the recommended decision of  the magistrate judge.

            The  district court  adopted the  reasoning of  this decision

            when it  dismissed appellant's complaint, and  we, too, think

            that reasoning is persuasive.  Appellant's motion for summary

            disposition is therefore denied.

                      Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
                      ________   ___

                                         -3-