Court Opinion

ID: 594108
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2011-08-23 10:20:52+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T14:57:21.690014
License: Public Domain

978 F.2d 1257
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Emilio H. PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6646.
United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.
Submitted:  September 14, 1992Decided:  October 19, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.  J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.  (CR-89-46-JFM, CA-92-958-JFM)
Emilio H. Perez, Appellant Pro Se.
John Vincent Geise, Office of The United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

1
Emilio H. Perez appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. S 2255 (1988).  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.  United States v. Perez, Nos.  CR-89-46-JFM, CA-92-958-JFM (D. Md. June 9, 1992).  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED