Court Opinion

ID: 4164061
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2017-04-27 19:04:23.981895+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T07:46:31.848762
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Alexander Otis Mathews appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration of its order reclassifying Matthews’ complaint as an attorney misconduct disciplinary complaint and denying his misconduct claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   Matthews v. Faulconer,
  
  No. 1:15-cv-00448-LO-MSN (E.D. Va., filed Nov. 14 & entered Nov. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED