Court Opinion

ID: 9575392
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-21 21:13:31.159376+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T12:48:10.102748
License: Public Domain

LOUIS J. CECI, J.
{concurring). I write a concurrence to my majority opinion solely to point out an error made by Justice Abrahamson in her dissent. The dissent erroneously states, "[UJnder the test set forth in Bachowski, the injunction upon which the conviction is based is invalid." Dissenting opinion at pages 395-396. The opinion of this court points out that the injunction was issued only after the issuing court was "presented with an adequate explanation of the type of conduct sought to be enjoined." Majority opinion at page 394. This was sufficient for constitutional purposes.
I am authorized to state that JUSTICES ROLAND B. DAY, DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and WILLIAM A. BABLITCH joins this concurring opinion.