Court Opinion

ID: 9953647
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-03-22 16:08:26.761113+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T08:02:42.878899
License: Public Domain

ZIA I

STATE OF LOUISIANA                                                                  NO.    2024       KW   0150

VERSUS

ABRAHAM         HOPKINS
                                                                                    MARCH        22,       2024

In   Re:          Abraham       Hopkins,                         for
                                                   applying              supervisory             writs,          19th
                  Judicial          District          Court,    Parish        of    East        Baton      Rouge,
                  No.    01- 11- 0101.

BEFORE:          MCCLENDON,              HESTER,     AND MILLER,        JJ.

        WRIT          DENIED        ON     THE       SHOWING     MADE.             Relator        failed           to
include:         the application for postconviction relief,                                     the    district
court'     s
                 ruling        denying            the     application              for     postconviction
relief,          pertinent           district           court    minutes,            and        the     State' s
answer,          if     any,        the        commissioner' s         report,            and     any        other
portions         of     the    district           court       record     that       might       support           the
claims         raised    in    the       writ     application.           Supplementation                of       this
writ
        application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be
considered.             See     Uniform          Rules    of    Louisiana           Courts       of     Appeal,
Rules      2- 18. 7 &     4-   9.         In   the    event     relator       elects       to    file        a   new
application            with    this       court,
                                                      he may do        so    without
of
                                                                                            the necessity
   obtaining a                return       date.         Any    future       filing        on    this        issue
should include                the        entire      contents     of        this     application,                the
missing items noted above,                       and a copy of this ruling.

                                                        PMC
                                                        CHH
                                                        SMM

OURT OF APPEAL,               FIRST CIRCUIT

                Y CLERK OF COURT
                FOR THE COURT