Court Opinion

ID: 4386504
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2019-04-11 18:06:23.360573+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T15:03:29.472014
License: Public Domain

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

                                         ATLANTA,____________________
                                                  April 04, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1639. GALE E. CHAMBERS v. ROYALTY, LLC et al.

      Royalty, LLC filed a dispossessory action in state court against Gale E.
Chambers. On January 15, 2019, the state court entered judgment in favor of Royalty.
Chambers then filed a “Complaint and Request for Injunction,” which the trial court
denied on February 7, 2019. Chambers filed a notice of appeal on February 14, 2019.
We lack jurisdiction.
      Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order
sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The underlying subject matter of an
appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate
procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The
underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. Under OCGA § 44-7-56,
appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within seven days of the date the
judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523
(521 SE2d 456) (1999). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an
absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Id. at 523. As Chamber’s
notice of appeal was filed 30 days after entry of the trial court’s order, it is untimely.
      The fact that Chambers filed a “Complaint and Request for Injunction” does
not alter this result. “[T]here is no magic in the nomenclature used. Under our rules,
pleadings are judged by their function and not the name used.” Masters v. Clark, 269
Ga. App. 537, 538 (604 SE2d 556) (2004) (punctuation omitted). In her filing,
Chambers argued that the hearing notice was sent to the wrong address and that
Royalty was not the true owner of the property. In substance, this filing constitutes
either a motion for reconsideration or a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60
(d). In either event, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal.
      An order denying a motion for reconsideration is not directly appealable, and
the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for filing an appeal. See Bell v.
Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga.
App. 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). To the extent the filing may be considered a motion
to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), Chambers was required to file an application
for discretionary appeal in order to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Accordingly,
this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                        Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
                                               Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
                                                                         04/04/2019
                                               I certify that the above is a true extract from
                                        the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
                                               Witness my signature and the seal of said court
                                        hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

                                                                                        , Clerk.