Court Opinion

ID: 9941188
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2024-02-16 01:01:23.192533+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:46:20.352971
License: Public Domain

Case: 23-10738         Document: 00517065483             Page: 1      Date Filed: 02/15/2024

              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit
                                      ____________
                                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                       No. 23-10738
                                     Summary Calendar                                  FILED
                                     ____________                               February 15, 2024
                                                                                  Lyle W. Cayce
   United States of America,                                                           Clerk

                                                                       Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                             versus

   Dmarcus Eugene Taylor,

                                               Defendant—Appellant.
                      ______________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Northern District of Texas
                                USDC No. 4:23-CR-64-1
                      ______________________________

   Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam: *
          The attorney appointed to represent Dmarcus Eugene Taylor has
   moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
   v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
   (5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

         _____________________
          *
              This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 23-10738     Document: 00517065483          Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/15/2024

                                   No. 23-10738

   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

                                        2