Court Opinion

ID: 624931
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2012-03-08 20:22:41+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T17:51:09.116985
License: Public Domain

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
 

  Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 

  PER CURIAM:
 

  Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court’s order affirming the clerk’s order taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
  
   See Kant v. Cohen,
  
  No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. filed July 11, 2011; entered July 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
 

   AFFIRMED.