Court Opinion

ID: 9525921
Source: CourtListenerOpinion
Date Created: 2023-08-07 03:09:28.913831+00
Date Added: 2024-06-11T13:17:24.481842
License: Public Domain

BAKER, Judge,
concurring in result.
I join with the majority only because I believe that, viewed in the .light most favorable to the prevailing party below, the evidence supports the trial court’s decision; therefore, I cannot say that its decision was plainly wrong. If the trial court had held on this same evidence that husband had become voluntarily underemployed, I believe that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to wife, we would have found evidence to support that decision and we could not have said that it was plainly wrong or that an abuse of discretion had been shown.
In matters of this nature, with this kind of evidence, generally, the decision of the trial court that views the witnesses must be upheld.